TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

YtBlue Archive

View 60 posts and 2,839 comments by YtBlue on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
118

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 03:07 AM
90

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 07:35 AM
90

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 01:31 PM
85

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 10:02 PM
79

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:09 PM
71

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 01:31 AM
66

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 09:16 PM
66

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:20 PM
65

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 01:21 AM
59

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 03:46 AM
59

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 03:35 PM
52

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 09:30 PM
37

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 06:42 AM
28

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 07:44 PM
25

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 06:53 AM
19

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:23 PM
19

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/20 05:52 PM
19

DiscussionYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/23 04:04 AM
16

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:14 PM
15

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 03:14 PM
13

DiscussionYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 04:19 AM
11

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:38 PM
10

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 01:46 AM
8

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 06:50 AM
6

YtBlue/r/askTRP04/03/20 01:51 PM
5

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 02:49 PM
5

YtBlue/r/askTRP04/09/20 04:57 PM
4

Question For WomenYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/20 03:59 AM
4

YtBlue/r/askTRP15/12/18 02:39 AM
4

YtBlue/r/askTRP24/11/19 06:01 AM
3

YtBlue/r/askTRP12/09/19 06:03 PM
3

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 02:37 AM
3

YtBlue/r/askTRP07/11/19 03:38 PM
3

YtBlue/r/askTRP14/10/20 07:31 AM
2

Inner Game YtBlue/r/seduction10/02/26 05:11 PM
2

YtBlue/r/askTRP10/06/20 10:27 AM
2

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 03:40 AM
2

YtBlue/r/askTRP17/10/20 12:12 AM
2

YtBlue/r/askTRP30/10/20 04:39 PM
1

YtBlue/r/askTRP04/09/20 04:55 PM
1

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/20 12:53 PM
1

Question For WomenYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 09:40 AM
1

YtBlue/r/askTRP02/09/20 12:05 PM
1

YtBlue/r/askTRP17/10/20 04:08 PM
1

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 04:06 PM
1

YtBlue/r/askTRP15/12/20 06:58 AM
0

YtBlue/r/askTRP03/03/20 11:25 PM
0

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:09 PM
0

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/23 01:32 PM
0

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:33 AM
0

YtBlue/r/askTRP21/02/20 04:04 PM
0

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 02:10 PM
0

YtBlue/r/askTRP26/09/18 10:22 AM
0

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:06 AM
0

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 06:20 PM
0

YtBlue/r/askTRP25/11/19 11:05 PM
0

DebateYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 03:43 PM
0

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 06:56 AM
0

Question For WomenYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 05:24 PM
0

CMVYtBlue/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/21 06:07 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,839 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

He's 100% correct
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 03:23 PM
1

Well are you dating not for a selfish ideal? Dont think this was thought through. In terms of a selfless ideal, men give up far more.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 11:17 PM
12

Yes the common trope told by society. Most Red Pill men do believe that men as a default are pigs and etc. However it leaves it out because its not need in harping on what already has been ingrained in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 11:09 PM
–

No, it doesnt matter. One day men will learn to demand things instead of asking. If they say no move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 11:05 PM
1

Strength/Power, at its core, is the ability to change surroundings and create safety. Which has broad categories
/r/seduction10/02/26 07:12 PM
1

Instead of saying why economic theory doesn't apply. You run to things that have no basis. Again you have no coherent theory just hate the idea because it exposes things you dont like
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 02:30 AM
1

Give a reason. Don't make a claim and not elaborate
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 09:06 PM
2

Im not saying a solution. Its just to acknowledge theres consequences
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 03:56 PM
-7

If someone has a choice of 1 item another has a choice of 20 items. If the person with 20 chooses wrong its worse than the one with 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 03:52 PM
3

Didnt say it was a problem. Its the consequences
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 03:06 PM
3

When did I say this. Where did I insinuate this. This is simply projection, hurt because it makes you understand your own flaw
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 03:05 PM
-3

when did I say its terrible. They do not date the same way men do
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 02:34 PM
-10

When did I say its bad. The conclusion is women are the cause of good or bad dating practices since they control the market
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 02:33 PM
2

This doesnt deny the prompt but insinuated, "Hey idc get better"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:29 PM
3

Physical attractiveness is not everything in woman's attraction and personality and actions drive a lot of attraction as well. For example confidence. Confidence is given to those who do some action repeatedly. They obtain successes and failures and stop caring. In dating to this, it takes experience, which is the basis of a player.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:25 PM
-10

Doesn't add to the discussion at all
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:24 PM
-8

This does not contribute to the prompt at all
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:20 PM
0

You can have confidence without ever trying, or try a million times and have less confidence than a man who's only tried a handful of times Theres no way you believe this. Unless delusional a fresh basketball player isnt gonna be confident in a NBA game. If you give women what they want, they will reward you. It's just that what they want might be the opposite of what they say, and it's usually up to the man to figure it out. Again if women want a player and you give them that. They'll reward yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:15 AM
-3

Better role models for women who tell them the truth. Not clickbait material and fake history that leads women to the same incel mindset they hate men for
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:11 AM
1

You’re assuming that the men are perfect sellers every time and that the women just can’t see that they’re great No im saying the things that make men great for relationships women do not like. For example shy men show they do not talk to many women. While confident men show theyre more than likely a player.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:08 AM
0

Simply do not get it. Every woman is seen as inherently valuable due to her ability to produce kids. The point is going over your head
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:06 AM
-5

If women are the cause of dating problems, then they are also the cause of dating benefits. Yes exactly. Not arguing that. When dating is good its mainly women's actions correcting the market. Women set the terms and men follow them. The cause of dating problems is either women's inability to communicate the terms Not an inability but not knowing the consequences of their terms. A confident man is most likely a player. Just because confidence comes from repeated tries successes and exposure. Whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:05 AM
3

Your not getting it. Every woman is considered that Ferrari and doesnt need to inherently sell herself to any heavy degree at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:02 AM
1

Well as i've said here before the failure of men to sell themselves is their problem to figure out. And with this statement, you just conceded to my point. Whether men fail to sell themselves isnt the point. Its whether most men are mainly in the seller position or buyer position
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:01 AM
1

No how the interactions go determine whether your the buyer or seller. In most situations the man is doing the approach so he becomes the seller.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:00 AM
-2

Walk into a Ferrari dealership. The cars look beautiful, enticing with a promise of luxury and looking rich. But see if any of those sellers come running to sell you a car. They will not unless your in the top % of men. Same concept with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 06:58 AM
5

Its not back to square one as your trying to place men into the buy position but no men have that except rich and powerful men. Aka the top percentile men the red pill talks about.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 06:56 AM
-6

No women entice men to approach them but dont need to sell themselves. Men jump hoops to be liked. Needing so many different traits, looks and many other things women dont need to do. Women just need to look good.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 06:53 AM
-5

No, naturally men have to sell themselves to women. Raising your standards does nothing if nobody is going for. Women have the privilege of at least getting some interaction when they raise standards. Although they may not keep that person. No women cause other women dating issues mainly as well
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 06:47 AM
10

The correct answer is many women are "dating" the same men in this age bracket.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 06:18 AM
2

No its not dimoprhism they just look for in data but things that imply you being above
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 05:51 PM
2

Maybe in your definition. But it leans more in subservience and automatically treating yourself as better.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 07:28 PM
0

Again trying sugarcoat this but literally just shows your delusion
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 07:13 PM
1

no an RP tenant is to treat your girl as #2. Same as im saying. Is not about leader and follower dynamic
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 07:10 PM
2

No men dated based on beauty and motherhood typically. Women date based on power. Its blank statements that generally allow insight to a categories actions
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 05:23 PM
2

So categories have shared traits. Humans like food, there maybe preferences but at the end of the day everybody eats. Varying degrees and so forth but there is always a shared premise between categories
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 05:13 PM
1

abuse: treat (a person or an animal) with cruelty or violence, especially regularly or repeatedly. -Oxford dictionary Now I'm assuming your socially literate. Your boss treats you as lesser. He is the boss, you are the employee. Is that abuse as well? Maybe you arent socially adept and can understand that you can treat someone as lesser but not abuse them. So im putting that notion forward
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 05:10 PM
1

Is that the majority? Yes or no
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 02:06 PM
2

Women telling they'd rather or only date men above themselves. Or there bare minimum for dating is stupid ideals like 6 figures
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:37 PM
0

No homogamy lumps rich into a class of things like 200+, while absolutely ignoring theres levels. Woman may make 200k but the man absolutely makes more.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:36 PM
0

Statistically untrue
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:35 PM
4

Just cause you say no doesn't erase the mountain of evidence we have for it
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 11:17 AM
-4

Where did I say abuse. You guys really have poor reading comprehension skills
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 11:17 AM
-1

Men care about looks but she doesn't have to look better than him in relation. Most relationships in general the woman doesn't look better than the man. Just women and simps give extra points to the woman
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 02:56 AM
-1

No women want hot attractive strong men in relationships. They have to settle most the time though
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 02:42 AM
1

Hypergamy most of the time is in terms of social class and money but it can be for other things as well
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 02:24 AM
1

Your telling people to google it when you have never read the redpill sidebar.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 02:24 AM
1

That's what a family oriented man does. A family can be two people
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 02:14 AM
0

You are nowhere near the looks level. To never see one attractive guy. This lets me know that ur opinion should be taken lightly as introspection isnt quite there
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 01:50 AM
6

Plenty do not
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 01:49 AM
3

The type of women men pursue show what theyre looking for. Men who are bachelors, look for the sexy type. Men who are family oriented, look for the family type.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:50 AM
2

Please refer to where I said badly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:49 AM
10

Men either become bachelors and get as many kids as possible or find one suitable woman and invest in her. These two guys act very different and are very obvious
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:28 AM
2

Yes it is foolish. Your not getting the point. A lot of moral attractiveness is subjectivity at the expense of you
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:27 AM
-6

Core tenant of red pill. You are not red pill then. Its in the sidebar. Its like claiming your Christian and not believing in christ
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:24 AM
35

Women make up more than half of the U.S. population, and control or influence 85% of consumer spending -Forbes 2019
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:23 AM
3

Disingenuously leaving out the rest. Complain because women do not have to. While theyre expected
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:19 AM
-2

Men here are expected to embody traditional gender roles. Women are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:14 AM
2

For example morally its seen as wrong to manipulate others. Even if they manipulate you. Moral logic like that only harms you. These ideas help because it keeps a theoretical framework to increase you and your partner staying together
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:13 AM
0

I am a teacher. I am not superior to my students. I am just older and more educated and experienced than they are. cant make it up...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:59 PM
-1

No women in general dont achieve as much. Especially when you get to a certain level. Frankly because you dont have to
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:59 PM
4

They want equal or above and typically dont want to go below. Your purposely leaving out the rest
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:58 PM
2

Your logic is crazy. Women do something, men are the problem
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:57 PM
4

You can be delusional all you want. But if women say they want more than, taller than. It denotes a common definition
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:54 PM
2

A teacher is superior to a student. A doctor is superior to the patient. Socially we practice this already. There's absolutes and non absolutes. But tell women that. They're mating choice reflects it
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:53 PM
4

Then thats on you. Many men would trade being morally attractive for sexual attractiveness. Morals are Subjective and most the time is celebrated even at your expense
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:52 PM
1

yes. if you read previously I answered thoroughly
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:50 PM
-10

In simplistic terms, your #1, shes #2
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:48 PM
2

Every woman ive had has been inferior in most aspects. I and most men do not care
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:46 PM
0

Hypergamy isnt conjecture, the rest is. However its conjecture that has basis in hypergamy. Based on what? hypergamy
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:45 PM
1

Men do not care if they are "inferior". Hypergamy has never changed. Its base definition is women's propensity to date/marry up and across.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:44 PM
–

Gender came from the Latin "genus," meaning birth/family/nation. Not generation. please look uo the 14c etymology. The first iteration. Gender isn't even real. It's a bunch of stereotypes. Even then, do you think atoms have genders? Protons, neutrons and electrons? Quarks? What gender is energy? Do different forms of energy have different genders? Is kinetic energy female or male? Yes they do. Male and female are nomenclature for positive and negative. Give and receive
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 02:29 PM
0

Simply because you dont understand what gender is doesn't mean it exists. Gender comes from the word generation. Or to create. Everything thats created follows the law of positive and negative(male and female). Therefore for creation to exist, gender must exist
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 05:35 PM
–

Tell that to most women. Wanting a partner who makes more, is not an equal partnership. Wanting a partner whose "above you" is inherently not equal. You have so many opinions for men but not a lot for women who perpetuate these sexist ideals
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 07:10 PM
–

By definition "less important; subordinate". Again please understand before you make a claim
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 02:50 AM
1

No one is subservient to anyone else, and no one should be treated as subservient to anyone else. In any context. Then you dont understand the definition of subservient. You are subservient to your boss, and a lot more.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 04:32 PM
1

That's the ex... you just agreed with me
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 01:56 PM
0

That is your opinion. Again it holds no validity
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 01:51 PM
1

Im on it for the fun of it. More assumptions. You cannot tell someone what fitness is for them. At the top it is anything but health oriented
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 01:50 PM
4

That's literally what this post is. Each common denominator is how I treated each individual woman. Poorly she stayed. Very well she left
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 09:37 AM
2

Exactly actually telling me just because someone gets paid more that theyre better
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 09:36 AM
0

Many men do. Those men typically get broken up with
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 05:45 AM
1

People thought the world being round was crazy. Look how stupid all of them looked. Its crazy to you, however your truth doesn't have to be the truth. Most the time, rhe truth of the majority is false
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 05:26 AM
0

lmao sure men do that. Recently I remembered girlfriend day got her a gift celebrated. Doesn't matter about that. Empty platitudes and you look to blame others and not look at a majority of women's actions
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 05:25 AM
1

You should treat people well because they're people. End of the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 05:21 AM
2

Whatever world your living in let me see. Even rich and famous men get cheated on. If it was self evident then wouldn't be the case
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 05:19 AM
1

Not entirely simping but treating her very well. Paying for everything. Being very caring. Texting too fast. These things sounds innocent, however small stuff like this adds up to her perception about you
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 04:55 AM
0

please read. Reading comprehension is bad. As I never said that
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 04:53 AM
0

You just acted like all these guys are A class actors. Its very easy to pick the abusers from non abusers. If it takes you a few months to spot real red flags. Stop dating
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 04:52 AM
-1

Then you have no idea of fitness. There's attainable, and then theres not attainable. I went to the gym consistently for 5 years before. Yet again more assumptions
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 04:51 AM
2

She and the rest dont understand that. This isnt karma. This is some gotcha moment for her for someone she probably liked deeply and they ended things
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 04:50 AM
2

assumptions. When did I say I worship capitalism
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 04:49 AM
1

never did and your just grasping at straws
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 04:47 AM
1

What's wrong with that? Plenty of your favorite celebrities are the same
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 11:21 PM
-1

Sure if you wanna put yourself into the same camp shes in. It says a lot about you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 11:20 PM
3

Well all ive been given are anecdotal experiences for someone whose "normal". How is their opinions more valid than mine?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 11:19 PM
1

All of these are assumptions. Im basing off of experiences and correcting as I go
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 11:14 PM
3

Not one single engineer ive seen has similar background or life experiences. I dont know where your getting that from. We have engineers who come from poverty, some from riches. Some with good homes, some with bad homes. A job says nothing but "I chose this path and worked for it".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:59 PM
4

No it doesn't. Im currently an engineer with a GP business. I make way more than the average. Even more than what most people consider rich. Even then im no better and not any better than someone poor. So definitely dont say that. Its a slap in the face to all the poor homeless men id see who'd give their left foot and society treats them like shit
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:51 PM
-1

You need to make peace because he's still on your mind. That tells me all I need to know. This is years after too. The fact you have no retrospective skills to see that is appaling
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:48 PM
-4

Equal partnership. However equal partnership is not what women want. Especially attractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:45 PM
-1

If you cant comprehend what I meant in the last comment. Then I cannot help you and this conversation will never be understood
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:44 PM
–

Currently the only real socially accepted places is the bar. However I say to approach whenever and wherever you want. That's what I do. Walmart, mall, bar, classes. Doesn't matter. At the end of the day your the only one whose gonna be alone at night, not anyone else
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:43 PM
5

She meant hiding that your doing it on purpose. Not the action itself
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:41 PM
-2

I never made a contract. As I could care less. So no its not about that. Nor was I pushover. Im literally a roided up 6 foot man. I neither fit the bill of a nice guy or attitude wise. I just chose to cognitively choose to treat my women very well.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:41 PM
2

Which statistics show that women leave men for being nice to them? This is the point in your post, so it seems strange that you're avoiding showing any evidence. Im not its a questions thats readily apparent through other stats. For example, no matter what profession you are. There a good people and bad people. However regardless if your a good person or not. A lower paying profession or even lesser status job dramatically increases divorce chances. A good paying job lessens the chance of divorc…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:39 PM
-1

My ex? He had nothing but a long slow slope to the grave, miserable and fat and ultimately alone. I laid white roses on his grave and told him I won. I had. This says all. Visiting an exs grave years after you split. Apparently, he was horrible at that. He's dead, free and your still mentally tied to him. Who really won?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:29 PM
1

It isnt about being a bad guy but framing it into "the woman is here to serve me" not the other way around
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:16 PM
6

I could keep the 5 i treated bad, but I left them all as I couldn't take it. As a child I dreamed of doing everything for my woman. A Disney fairytale somewhat. I strived hard. However experience says to do otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:15 PM
2

No as a job doesn't define you as a person. Men know that. Women do not
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:14 PM
0

Style is a reflection of mindset. I can tell you only stick to certain people.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:11 PM
3

That doesn't explain why most men are not marrying women far below them in terms of wealth. That's a question of economics most men and women are at the bottom. However marriages last when the husband makes more
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:11 PM
6

Currently no the last girl I treated very well and she left. This is after 10 relationships I experimented with. 5 I treated well. 5 I treated bad. Same thing happened in all
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:08 PM
0

Great reply and contribution!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 10:06 PM
-1

Alternative girls is not just looks. Country girls are not just looks. This lets me know that you only talk to a narrow group of people. Country girl values and alternative girl values are typically totally different. Even the personality between a heavier girl and a skinnier girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:53 PM
7

I treated some of the girlfriends I had very well. Those always left with excuses. The ones I didnt treat well. Still want me and have good things to say
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:52 PM
4

I never did. As I do think by definition, it is sexist. However experience told me otherwise .
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:51 PM
1

Let's use some retrospection skills and think. The majority of people are not A class actors. Red flags are apparent. So either those traits attracted them in the first place, or this is just an excuse to justify falling out of love
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:50 PM
-1

Im open to every woman. I've dated alt, fat, country, every race and almost every kind of woman. It has been purely consistent across all
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:49 PM
4

You give an anecdote, perfectly fine. I give an anecdote, "your talking out ur ass". Nice!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:46 PM
5

Its not an "ability". Just a framework change. There is no acting involved
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:46 PM
1

Yes I agree a spectrum exists. No Mr Nice Guy explained the dichotomy of men. Nice gets you nowhere. Being selfish(asshole) does. As a man if you fall nobody will be there to help. Look at homeless men vs homeless women. In competition, which is the crux of making money, the selfish one wins out. Power accrual same thing. Problem is power is what attracts women
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:45 PM
2

This is entirely a woman thing. Not a person thing. So to some degree women work that way. Just like men are hornier
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:43 PM
-1

Criticism is appreciated.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:42 PM
2

Due to marriage statistics, very common. Men could care less if you work at McDonald's or a CEO. We marry the same because at large women your age demand to be above or at least on par
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:41 PM
3

Your not some special class of people who can detect when people are hiding intentions. Let's be realistic
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:40 PM
4

All the guys I know that didnt. Never had a woman to begin with
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:38 PM
2

Not about being a dick but she's subservient to you. Even "High value men" Don't understand this. No matter how much you have. If you keep treating her very well. She'll leave too
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:38 PM
-5

You dont say it. You just do it. But yes saying this consciously would turn any woman off
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:37 PM
-3

Not purely sexual. To even be with a woman, most the time sexual attraction should come first. If not your friends/roommates
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 09:19 PM
–

This statement doesn't line up with the fact you tried to state a wrong fact before out of feelings. Then reply on top of that
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 06:46 PM
–

Gay divorce rates are the lowest. It was already high before red pill. So its safe to assume it isnt redpill
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 01:48 PM
1

And I don't know what can possibly close that gender empathy gap Hurt is the greatest teacher. That's why the redpill is necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 01:24 AM
1

Sadly when you have something thats far left on the spectrum, you need something on the far right to balance. Either I would be.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 12:49 AM
1

Agree fully
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 10:19 PM
1

I should have clarified. The redpill texts, for the most part, doesn't go to far. However the people who subscribe to it do. AWALT( All women are like that) is extreme to people who dont know the basis. Meaning every woman has the capacity to but may not do so. However topics like this always have people who take it to the extreme
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 09:10 PM
0

These arent tricks but roles not given because of society but because thats what people like
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 02:01 AM
0

Again, an inability to see our lives are different. Men do these things, however men most of the time do the heavy lifting(burden of performance).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 11:03 PM
3

You think RP is bad. Proceed to say I never found an attractive man or Chad thats RP. Implying that attractive men cannot be bad. Even if your saying that this is what you've seen personally, it still begs to question why would you say that, knowing that attractive people can be bad too.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 11:00 PM
7

So women just like men can point out the obvious flaws in the opposite. When it comes to advice, you have to know the small details that go into being that thing(man/woman). That can only be done well by someone of the same perspective(not always but the majority). So the red pill really just calls out the problem but doesn't really work when it tries to tell women what they should do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 10:38 PM
3

Yep thats the problem. That comment applies to you and you'd understand it with some introspective skills
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 10:34 PM
1

That's not a mistake. Just because you provide doesn't mean your beta. Beta is a submissive state. For example a man can be alpha and still provide. That state of weakness is what causes you to be placed in a box. Non threatening, non sexual
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 10:17 PM
5

I've never seen an attractive or Chad man be RP This statement says a lot about you. "Attractive people are never bad people"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 10:05 PM
0

It literally has a bunch of reading texts. That is the basis. What are you talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 09:13 PM
1

Read the red pill sidebar
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 09:05 PM
0

No the redpill started from a reddit forum. There is a fundamental text associated with it. The red pill idea has a consensus but some people may say whatever they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 09:03 PM
1

Alpha = dominance/desire and Beta = provision/provider, as in AF/BB. I think you fundamentally do not recognize what dominance is. Its a form of strength. So not a common misrepresentation, just you not understanding what the definition entails. If im in a dominant position, im always in a stronger position.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 09:01 PM
1

People can have their own opinions. However I can tell you never read the red pill book and just listen to what you hear. There is a definite consensus on the red pill. With other denominations of it. There's also a central idea with other denominations branching off of that
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 08:32 PM
1

I agree. Red pill can go too far. In the middle is best. Howevee the redpill is necessary for the experience of a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 08:25 PM
5

Fair isn't the argument. I cannot tell how someone should interpret fair in any context when its based on their own feelings. Items sure, feelings? No
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 08:11 PM
1

If half of American people vote for a redpill ideology. With more than half of men voting that way. What are you talking about. That is a clear indication of culture
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 08:07 PM
4

You need to be a rich, strong, dominant 6’3 Chad to get bitches” From this statement alone I can see you've never read the redpill. For reference the fundamental gist of redpill is that there are Alpha and Betas. Strong and Weak. You do not have to be a 6'3 Chad to get women but most men are given advice to appear Weak. Women do not prefer weaker but not all want a super strong man. Its relative and on a spectrum
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 08:05 PM
9

That's you personally and for me as well. I dont hate women in the slightest. However even if the truths ugly ill speak it. However some men get angry. Its bound to happen. You or I have no right to tell how someone should react to being lied to.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 08:02 PM
0

exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:58 PM
1

Culture and voting patterns say otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:54 PM
3

I've never been lonely for the time I've been red pill. Most RP men ive seen have not been the dweeb and losers. All this is, is bias to fit your own narrative
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:50 PM
14

Yours is the most well thought out response imo. If a red pill was about sharing what worked, what not, discussing approaches/results and how to achieve what men want - i would have no issue with it. There is nothing wrong in advice of becoming better version of yourself, putting effort in looks, go to gym, become less scared of approaching and more confident, get your shit together and so on That's exactly how the redpill started. Early 2009 and onward from forums like SoSuave and other PUA for…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:48 PM
4

Believing in Christ is what make Christianity, Christianity. Its literally in the name.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:45 PM
4

Sure you can say whatever. However the redpill and its ideologies have gotten me farther in my relationships and experiences as a man
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:44 PM
-2

Sure whatever you wanna believe
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:42 PM
2

No it wasnt.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:41 PM
3

Then theyre not redpill. Thats like taking Christianity, saying they dont believe in Christ. It fundamentally changes the concept
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:41 PM
1

Then why was Andrew Tate so wildly popular and liked by men. Why is trumps talking points red pill coated and thats our dominating culture for men? I think your just living in a world thats untrue
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:39 PM
2

Metaphors must not be a thing anymore. Its just a reference point. A good basketball player learns the fundamentals from others. I just used something natural as its a better one to one comparison
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:39 PM
2

So your statement only makes sense if The Red Pill was the prior mainstream advice. The red pill was born FROM the women centric advice given to men. The red pill was the advice born from terrible advice
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:36 PM
7

There is a book on the subreddit. You havent done enough research
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:35 PM
0

Then explain why red pill content is so popular? The most searched man of our decade, was an outward red pill advocate
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:34 PM
2

Anybody can say or interpret whatever. If you havent taken the time to read the red pill. Then your taking other people's bias. If you guys were dating, you wouldn't be here making posts like this one. More assumptions? Frankly everybody looks for places to vent their frustrations or grievances. Women do as well all the time. However when men do it, they cant be getting none? Is that the correct logic
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:33 PM
0

Most men do. Nobody says it, but Andrew Tate, Trump, and many men like this are famous for a reason today
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:30 PM
3

Life is all about experiences. Your experiences shape the advice you give. Women fundamentally do not to through the same experience that a man goes through. Overlap for sure but not enough. Most women are incapable to actually give good advice because they do not live as a man
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:29 PM
4

Anything not women centric is called misogyny. So again same problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:28 PM
-1

Nobody said that
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:27 PM
6

If that was the case, logically, there'd be no market for red pill. However redpill is very mainstream for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:26 PM
2

You cant claim "You guys" without knowing our lives individually. Your making big claims that frankly you'll never be able to prove.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:26 PM
5

No, most people dont like the red pill because its not women centric. But male centric.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:25 PM
-4

A hunter isnt born a good hunter. He's taught the fundamentals from others. Most men do not have a teacher. The RedPill was born from the SoSuave community and other PUA forums where men who did not have a teacher looked for guidance
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:23 PM
–

I dont use online dating. Also currently have a long term girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 09:07 PM
1

I totally agree. A lot of them are
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 12:02 AM
0

You hear women bad and didnt hear the part where I said men do hypocritical things as well. Please understand the inner bias you have
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 04:40 AM
1

Um this prefix doesn't apply for this word.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:33 PM
2

Hypocritical(adjective): characterized by behavior that contradicts what one claims to believe or feel : characterized by hypocrisy
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:33 PM
0

Then every person in existence is a good person. Not a very smart definition
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:31 PM
2

omen arent the issue, other men are. Crazy confirmation bias. Yet you call mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:31 PM
-2

Same thing has happened to men yet nobody put a name to it. Still same logic applies
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 09:08 AM
-2

One society great. Many others weren't like that
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 08:48 AM
-12

No just because women had troubles doesn't mean society wasnt women centric. In every society the women were to survive over the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 08:35 AM
–

You only understand the dictionary definition of words I hope u can reread this and hear how crazy this sounds
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 08:33 AM
0

You already lost when you claimed a slur isnt that and the definition said it was. Now your doing this
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 08:21 AM
4

I hate to tell you but this isnt a fantasy world. Men go to war to fight off other men. A lot of times women are the ones pushing for it. Slavery? A lot of white women pushed to keep slaves. Just because you dont send people directly doesn't mean you dont play a role.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:55 AM
-7

Yes not denying women had bad things they had to be subjected to. But whats worse. Being taken care of at home with a man your parents vetting that loves you a family. Or having all of that, but your property of the state and your likely to die at anytime because of it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:54 AM
3

This is very telling of how you treat people. If im a straight male and like to be thought of as such. Someone spreading rumors im gay IS defamation
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:46 AM
2

Already read. Selectively picking parts of history and not taking everything into account. Not once does it address how women dont have to go to war. Most of the major duties were given to men regardless if they wanted to or not
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:43 AM
0

Depends on how you define "good people"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:40 AM
-2

Not jokes specific mainstream platforms to talk about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:40 AM
2

Now your pulling out stuff I never said
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:38 AM
5

From Oxford definition a slur(noun): an insinuation or allegation about someone that is likely to insult them or damage their reputation. So either your right or the dictionarys wrong. Which one is it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:36 AM
3

When I look it up it. It acts as if that mantra comes from the titanic. You cant be serious. Its not a myth just because the titanic men didnt get off the boat.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:34 AM
1

That's the whole point of the post... and its flying over your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:29 AM
-3

Within communities and only recently. However, TV and anything mainstream, men have never had a paltform to talk about women. Since we have online forums and videos men have a space to talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:28 AM
1

You just said dating isnt about going out with someone to find out if you like them. To make your argument make sense. You had to throw out common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:26 AM
-3

In what times has the average women not been treated as special in society? For most societies. Women and children first then the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:25 AM
2

Left leaning women say it as well. Just because you belong to some political party doesn't devoid you of the action
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:24 AM
-7

Everything you said is 100% correct. I made this post just to show the hypocrisy women do. Because everything i did here women do and its socially accepted to do so. The point is to show the large hypocrisy done to men. Until recently( red pill movement) this was only done by women. Magazines and things of that nature always sought to placate women. As well as talk shows on TV.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:23 AM
–

Sure if thats what you feel like you should label me. I pointed out behaviors, you pointed out to name calling. Whose the angry one here? Even so I can use the same logic women use. "If theres a bad 10 in a mix of a 100 women, were not gonna take the chance to find out"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:20 AM
-2

Just a word salad and I cant believe you said dating isnt going out with people to see if you like them. Its like your trying to win an argument by acting as if it doesn't exist
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:18 AM
-7

Its always has. Early on in history. Most people farmed so men and women worked at home. For a short period of time before the industrial revolution, all the hard jobs only men could do. Throughout most history women got to stay at home while men saw their brothers, and fellow friends get hurt in war from many things. Even today men have to be in selective services while women do not
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:16 AM
–

The fact you're responding says otherwise. Id love for a debate and not name calling.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:12 AM
2

Yes however maybe this is wrong but I genuinely believe titles and subtitles carry shared experiences and beliefs. For example if I go to athletes i can guarantee most but not all believe in practicing. How to practice may vary from each subdivision(basketball,football, etc) but the notion still stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:11 AM
1

Anyone you dont take seriously you dont respond to. Why? Because its not serious to you. However you responded with nothing but name calling. By actions, it seems like you care a lot
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:10 AM
–

In what fashion did i say I hate women. I pointed out things women do. Never once said theyre stupid or any of the sort. I believe women are smart and have the capacity to do well. Just have been coddled by society for too long
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:08 AM
-5

I appreciate your story. Mine has been equal. However one anecdote isnt a great representation for a debate
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:07 AM
–

Incel means involuntary celibate. I am not. I am also not misogynistic. This is criticism and I guess you dont like
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 07:05 AM
3

Or you could use the common sense answer. Past behavior is a great predictor of future behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 06:36 AM
1

Don't think so. Anything mental doesn't have to be based in reality. Nobody sees reality for what it is. If so the world would look way differently
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 06:42 AM
1

The term "player" comes by knowing the rules of the game. So everybody who knows the rules are inadvertently players. Just depends on what definition you use. The original definition of player or what everybody else say now
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 05:51 AM
2

Some do some dont.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 05:12 AM
8

Conservative women are too. You just give them a pass. Just look at Tomi Lahren
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 04:30 AM
2

Some settle, but sometimes it doesn't matter if they're on paper on equal footing. It only matters if she views her man as above her. Which isnt based on reality all the time
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 04:27 AM
1

Higher income men more likely to marry and have children. Higher income men more likely to remarry. Richer men more likely to stay married. Wealth increasing chances of dates compared to a poorer man. Heightism and its effect on perceived partner Outlook and much more
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 04:25 AM
1

Marriage and relationships. Women tend to marry/pair with those they deem on equal or higher footing
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 08:39 PM
1

From stats and behavioral trends. Women want to date their level and above(power). Its purely mental based as the guy doesn't actually have to be "on her level". Women picked based on perceived levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 07:26 PM
3

Women's sexuality starts from mentality. Power/Strength attracts women. Each Women has their prioritized preference. Eg. Smarter men, richer men etc. However power brings out the worse in people. So Women end up dating shitty men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 06:40 PM
27

Nope. Women are already very good at spotting the men who'd be good for them. They're just not attracted. Just like men they think with one head not the other
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 10:05 AM
7

Most people are ugly, most are too delusional to recognize. So how are you attracted to your partner? Get the premise?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 11:40 PM
2

Well if most people are looking for ducks and your a snake, doesn't matter that you're "different". The fact of the matter is women prefer strength and that will continue despite women complaining about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 08:19 AM
4

Yes just like I have a duty to protect and provide, not with random though. I dont know what this prompt is trying to prove though
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 09:01 PM
6

Well, there are actual studies that assert this same claim. Women have a stronger in group bias and typically are more social than men. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 07:51 PM
–

Its simple -OP Then proceeds to list a metric ton of requirements, few also being person to person specific
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 10:29 PM
–

It could include marriages with a partner on their 2nd or 3rd marriages but those people's divorce rates would be tracked separately. That's the core of the problem. It would affect the first married partners statistics and future outlook as well. But regardless, it's irrelevant, if your numbers are accurate, the total divorce rate should encompass higher rates during some periods of marriage vs lower rates elsewhere. Very relevant because if time spent accounts for a huge drop-off. The yearly r…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 06:03 PM
–

I'm thinking you have an input error or 15 years is too short of a time interval Arbitrary cut off because we do not have studies that sccount for time spent. It is not a flat dice roll percentage. E.g a steady 2.28%. As years increase its safe to assume the chance of divorce lowers. That being said the stat you want to track if you care about this is what % of first marriages end in divorce. That way you aren't considering serial divorcers. Still not considering serial divorces because we dont …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 05:08 PM
1

The divorce rate is calculated based on the total number of people per 1000 per year. Based on either dice roll statistics or not account for serial daters/divorcers.It is not a accurate representation but I cannot teach mathematically concepts so you may believe whatever
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 01:54 PM
1

However that 25% is based on flawed mathematics on purpose. They calculate it like a flat percentage instead of correcting it with different variables(time spent, impulsively, class). When you account for a good person, of u hold up your end of the bargain, divorce rates are much lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 01:44 PM
1

Serious resources determined by who? Well established by who? Remember every organization has an agenda and its rarely the truth. That is the purpose of any educational agenda
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:29 PM
1

The problem is there is a subsection of the population. Maybe 1/10 etc (there isnt a number but we know theyre around), Who are serial daters/divorcees. You include them in the population with normal and you get a skewed average. Tac that on with a flat percentage for a number of years you get a crazy high number
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 01:39 AM
0

Please look through the comments. I run through a simple calculation they use. Its based on set premises. E.g one year is 3%. They dont care to put variables in it but treat it as a flat percentage. Similar to how you calculate a dice roll
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 01:14 AM
1

its lower than 30% way lower. Read please. They are predicted it based on a dice roll. E.G always a same %. However marriage is not equal every year. It is multivariable.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 01:12 AM
0

They want their cake and eat it to. Men and women. Nobody takes loss that well where they can drop you so quickly. Evolution doesn't happen through that. It happens through female selection
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:53 AM
0

The source is doing the math. Look at the references and replicate it mathematically. Multiple sources to find. I even listed in comments
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:51 AM
1

Do you understand projections with no flat percentages are inherently false? They even stated this premise in a round about way. The projections in Table 11, then, reflect only current rates of marital transitions which are assumed not to change for the peri- od under examination — this is one of the basic assumptions of this type of life table. In other words, the pro- jections in this report only reflect what will occur in the future if mar- riage and divorce patterns remain constant over time…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:51 AM
1

Yes it is please look at how the math is done. Its in a comment below
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 11:50 PM
2

And i see the opposite. I also dont come from higher income families.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 09:08 PM
0

However your still at base an animal with the same instincts. Humans get attached very easily and don't wanna lose anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 08:59 PM
1

The steps for math is under a comment. But 22.8/1000. Find the percentage. Find the chance of success. Account for the years. The problem with that metric is it does not account for time spent and other variables. Because a flat rate of 2.28% implies a sort of dice role stat. Which is untrue
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 08:22 PM
1

the total of married women in the span of a year Its a rate come on.... 22.8/1000. You can extrapolate to the population. You understand what a rate is right? the total of women married for life We're trying to find the chance of divorce at certain points in life. E.g a year together, 5, 10 etc. Your point is moot. the adjusted numbers were Read it's described. Im just starting to think stats and math concepts your not getting from the paper
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 08:13 PM
0

Yes but people dont just leave. Especially after a long time spent. That is unnatural behavior. A 40%-51% divorce rate goes against natural behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 08:10 PM
2

If you understand what a GP does. I make far more currently than any Underwater pipeline job. However my risk is wayyy larger as im handling loans 2 million minimum
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 07:52 PM
2

Even so loss is a heavy fear embedded into people. When people gain something(a wife/husband) it is unnatural to get rid of it quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 07:50 PM
2

So there are some people who are serial daters/divorces and such. Those people are the contextualized shitty people. If everyone leaves you, then what does that say about the person?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 07:48 PM
2

Your kidding me the first sentence. "The adjusted divorce rate in the U.S. peaked in 1979 at 22.6 divorces per 1,000 married women ". It a comparison between divorces per 1000 women in that year
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 07:46 PM
1

using math you can conceptually push any narrative you want? l Yes for example. Studies with higher rates. Let's say theres 1 murder in a white community. 10 in a black community. If present as this it doesn't seem so bad. However if i say blacks commit crimes 10x more. That is how you factually but falsely tell the wrong story with math
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 06:30 PM
2

Well percentages work like this. A 4 sided die is 25% to land on each side. For simplicity it will always be 25%, no matter the trials. Marriage and most stats are multivariable not following the fundamentals prior. The first couple years may be volatile up to a point but as time goes on the flat percentage may be something as low as 1%
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 06:28 PM
2

No its based on for every 1000 married 22.8 divorced. Which part is confusing
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 06:25 PM
3

Depends on many factors. Divorce and its problems is not a flat rate its multivariable. So using your example lets say the job pays well 400k and is multivariable. After a certain amount of years the year by year risk would considerably drop off. On top of that accounting for skill,carelessness and other factors, your flat percentage becomes something so ludicrously small that id personally take in a heartbeat. What people fail to realize is risk is relative. Relative risk means it can be consid…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:07 PM
2

Not im using their stats. Smart enough to replicate it, and I see the mathematical infallacies they use to push propoganda. Most people are terrible at math and just spout whatever they hear. I gave you the steps to see yourself and you havent tried
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:00 PM
0

Didnt even run the numbers just talking without being able to mathematically reproduce. You fundamentally do not understand. I cannot compete with dunning kruger. You got it
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:58 PM
2

Im an Electrical Engineer but currently do GP business cause I need money
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:54 PM
0

Your not getting it at all. I accounted for a lifetime using the worse possible metric. What part are you not getting?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:52 PM
0

The math accounts for years using THE BIGGEST year in divorces. Read it I accounted for years. I took the worse case scenario. Broke it down mathematically to show you the clear bias. This doesn't take in to account those the point in year where things drop off considerably due to(time spent). So even the number i accounted for its at least half that of what I calculated https://www.bgsu.edu/ncfmr/resources/data/family-profiles/loo-divorce-rate-US-geographic-variation-2022-fp-23-24.html
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:47 PM
6

nope untrue mathematically. Im not guessing and look under one of the comments I took you through the steps of the math
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:44 PM
1

Crude takes into account just the total population by the marriages in that year. Look it up. That's a terrible ass way to do a stat. Take two unrelated topics and make a stat
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:44 PM
-1

Not at all taking from their stats. 22.8 rate in 1978. (22.8/1000)*100 is 2.28%. Subtract one by 2.28% and thats the chance you stay together is that number. So to find chance of failure you now take this number and raise it to the power of 15(accounts for years). That's just using the highest number with NO external variables. Add external variables back and you have considerably lower number.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:42 PM
1

No, the divorce rate isnt high for everyone. The divorce rate is high for shitty people. They include those shitty people, who keep marrying making shitty decisions with normal people who throw off the numbers for regular people. The reason why the number plays out like that is because they're including CHILDREN and and other subsets of the population(teenagers) who dont get married. Combine that with an aging population (with those fuckups) you get a way higher number than advertised.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:39 PM
3

Top paying doctors(surgeons/ER doctors/plastic surgery) I see with hotter wives and cheat more. So I mean your anecdotal evidence means very little. On top of that Jeff Bezos is a serial cheater so terrible example
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 05:38 PM
3

You're telling me that I don't know what my profession can make? A GP in the community should be clearing 300k a year working 4 days week. That sets the stage for everyone else. Let's argue rare professions and use that as a basis for argument. Smart plan. Lol power. This isn't a movie or video game. You think owning a 5 bedroom house with a nice car and going on 2 nice trips per year gives you power? You just dont live in reality. Comfort is a form of power as power is the only thing that can o…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 05:28 PM
3

A 7 figure or high 6 figure income isn't uncommon in medicine, or high end dentistry or any reasonably successful business owner. You have to be kidding me. The vast amount of workers in medicine do not make a high 6 figure income. Most pool below 500k. Doctors as a profession is even rare to begin with. Same with dentistry and the average business owner doesn't even make it past 150k. Average is 100k. With most pooling below because of the nature of averages. End of the day, you cannot buy attr…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 07:09 AM
4

Try 10 times more than 100k+ as far as income goes. highly doubt this sounds like LARP When I frequent nice restaurants and 5 star hotels and 1st class cabins on the plane, I often find the men are a bit better looking honestly. Then your either not going to nice places or your just bsing. The highest paid individuals are typically older, not the 20-28 year olds. Anyone who thinks older people are more attractive than younger is delusional
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 06:31 AM
3

Women dont expect a normal job. Most women while young and hot, have ridiculous requirements. 100k+
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 06:11 AM
–

This is ragebait and yall fall for this. It probably isnt even a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 07:25 AM
2

Your just typing stuff up to sound smart at this point. Please look up the definition of what you type then come back
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 03:15 PM
1

What do you think sexual attractiveness is?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:58 PM
2

Very thought-out response!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:57 PM
0

When have I ever said that. Just taking whatever you wanna hear and run with it
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:56 PM
-1

And you did nothing but agree to the prompt..
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:55 PM
-4

Just like there are weak men and strong women. However trends happen for a reason and for argument sake you always argue in the majority not the minority
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 06:50 AM
-6

are they actually men or women cosplaying as men on an account?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 06:24 AM
-8

Men are very logic driven, so this could be the case. Men stick to definitions and are rigid in doing so. When a woman says, "Be attractive," she may mean be sexually attractive but a man doesn't hear it that way
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 05:53 AM
2

Definitely can agree with this
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 05:52 AM
2

No that isnt what im saying. Be sexually attractive before attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 05:50 AM
-4

They are not gonna use logic to talk. Its just emotions to hide their own innate "non-mainstream" preferences
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 04:37 AM
2

These are general specific terms but what your stating still falls into the argument. Each womans finds traits dominant and put men into different categories. But in general for women those traits are not the same
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 04:18 AM
2

Yes it's a great video showing this concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 04:16 AM
2

They'll say a guy is ugly then see his lambo and want to fvk him. Use him*
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 04:08 AM
-1

I can agree with this. Your take is nuanced, and im not saying your wrong. Im just making things simplistic so normal unaware people can get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 04:07 AM
1

Every trait you listed can fall under general attractiveness and it differs from women to women For simplicitysake a confrontational person is not "attractive". That personality trait does not draw people towards you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 04:05 AM
1

ncreasingly, so are women just false. a woman whether she is shy or not will be approached.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 03:58 AM
3

yes, because society teaches the opposite. This whole sub is based on this premise
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 03:55 AM
-1

Very different. For women, a sexually attractive woman is approachable. A sexually attractive man is not necessarily approachable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 03:35 AM
0

You guys fail to see your saying aggression is always bad. You guys aren't understanding context matters. In many cases, aggression is beneficial. If she wants to play that card then I can say nice is bad, because your always giving something up for someone else. The fact of the matter is she said confrontational behavior does turn on her. Its just contextual.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 03:33 AM
1

Definitely not.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 03:31 AM
2

Labels create shared experiences. Men will have different experiences than women. Even then, the subgroups of each will have different experiences. However, as a male, we all have shared experiences and can make polarizing statements based on those shared experiences
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 03:09 AM
0

Aggression is not a good trait and will always end up turned towards you at some point. I’ll pass So your saying aggression is not a good trait in one sentence I don’t want a man who deals with anything (outside someone literally being violently assaulted) aggressively. Then, admitting to aggression being a good trait contextually? We're literally back to square one with the logic
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 03:03 AM
-4

confrontational: tending to deal with situations in an aggressive way; hostile or argumentative -Oxford dictionary. Now, Where does it say you have to start it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:55 AM
-10

Most men do not get that. Your on a sub like this which is why your aware. For the general public, the generic advice is be nice, understanding, friendly and things like that
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:53 AM
-2

So you refute my statement by stating you like a man who is confrontational and Its just context dependant? You see where you're proving the statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:46 AM
2

This goes for both ways and even in-between genders. There's always one party putting in more than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:24 AM
–

There's physical signs. If I got women in bed, I'd think I'd be socially calibrated to tell the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:22 AM
–

It's more like women lie. I've had women shake and push me off multiple times. Then tell me they didn't orgasm
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 01:33 AM
1

Sure women just love "personality". Niceness or kindness doesn't ensure protection, doesn't ensure anything substantial. Power itself does. You can have power without kindness and kind people general have very minimal power.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 08:21 PM
1

Dominance and Submission are the basis of sexuality. If a girl does not feel below you mentally(submissive) there will be no attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:45 AM
1

Well, girls, especially college-aged women look down on girls who go on Tinder or any dating app. It's seen as desperate like you can't get attention irl
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:43 AM
2

Yet I don't. At the end of the day, your not trying to get women so you can't exactly say what gets them or not
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 11:42 PM
1

Nobody says this outright. However it is common behavior. It takes a certain Emotional and Social IQ to detect.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 07:25 AM
7

Yea no. Voting is not a basic human right. It's a societal conditioned "right". Many would not jump at a chance to throw their life away so they could put a paper in a ballet. Or get a loan when they're husband's were obligated to.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 07:23 AM
1

Okay well if you can't scroll down read a link of the fact. Then I'll leave you to cry on your own
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 06:05 AM
1

read chat. maybe take a trip to google. very easy to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 06:03 AM
0

Nothing can be asserted without evidence. The fact you tried to throw that out there to sound smart is crazy. All it is is your feelings got hurt so you went to attack. Just keep it moving and cry
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 06:01 AM
0

Very good addition to a debate post! Very non emotional and logical
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 05:59 AM
-3

Those are all traits of dominance or in species displays of dominance. Not to look good. Studies show higher testosterone doesn't make someone more attractive but does increase their perceived dominance.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 05:41 AM
1

Less confrontational, agreeable. Picture the things that make women attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:01 AM
5

Never seen that. Most women are unaware men still have to do selective services
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:00 AM
1

exactly. Even in the real world people will virtue signal you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:59 AM
3

TLDR of your post is basically why are men different while agreeing with my premise?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:05 AM
1

Im not kind at all. Never implied I was
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:04 AM
4

Im not complaining just explaining a fact so another man can see. Learn and not have to go through life experience to learn
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:04 AM
1

I cannot list every example or this post would be too long
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:03 AM
0

More than yourself is the basis of dominance and submission. Or in laymens terms above and below. Power dynamics. Very simple concept
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:02 AM
1

Read comments or look up on google
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:02 AM
7

No but I have never heard of a woman who helped fought against it
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:01 AM
12

So first a few logical facts. Women have never been oppressed. This idea of that is false. Mens privileges were given on the basis of war. Loans, Cars and etc. Even so today men are only afforded those on that basis. Its illegal if every man doesn't sign up for the selective service(draft). While women are exempt. The R word is also relatively low so this idea that men as a whole are dangerous is false. Also catcalled is also deemed sexual assault in studies and that's a ridiculous notion. Unedu…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:28 AM
1

I've went from sitting at home wondering if somethings wrong. To having a bodycount of 50. That's excessive however I had a few inherent issues within myself that needed to be fixed. I got that way by understanding what women in general won't admit to what they like. I never look weak in front of any woman. Only a certain type of weakness
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:19 AM
1

Its in the chat and if you have the willingness to search it's there as well
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:17 AM
3

I have a girlfriend and two other girls I stopped seeing for her
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:57 AM
0

complaining is weak behavior. Weak men don't get anything
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:55 AM
2

they'll never admit. Most people want to feel good about themselves. So they deny evidence and facts
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:54 AM
1

Sure whatever makes you sleep better
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:52 AM
1

Agreed but rather get it then not at all
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:50 AM
0

Immature is name calling. My perspective is data driven. Yours is emotional driven
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:49 AM
0

I've interacted with all kinds of women. This applies to most
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:49 AM
0

No but my posts will be constantly deleted for the slightest comment. But PPD will keep others
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:48 AM
0

I've only mostly lived in college towns. It's bigger here with more attractive people. But it's also prevalent in smaller places
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:06 AM
0

Im saying the common denominator is a power dynamic
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:05 AM
-3

Sexual success correlates to dominance while attractiveness in most studies is shaky
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 12:02 AM
1

https://ifstudies.org/blog/better-educated-women-still-prefer-higher-earning-husbands Here's one if you care you can look up more
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:37 PM
1

https://ifstudies.org/blog/better-educated-women-still-prefer-higher-earning-husbands I just literally googled and found this. Theres a lot of literature on it. Plenty.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:36 PM
0

Money, social class, intelligence and much more. There's tons of amazing literature on it
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:28 PM
1

Not just money. Social class and much more. Money is just one single factor. Power is a multivariable factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:28 PM
1

Marriage statistics. Women rarely marry below, only above. The ones who do the chance of divorce is higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:25 PM
2

For a population of 349million with a 95% confidence interval you need about 385 subjects.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:23 PM
2

I based it off of 349 million. For the US population. However this is a worldwide phenomenon and you can do the same for those. Free confidence calculator apps online you can verify
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:19 PM
0

Women marry up not down. Women date up not down. Whether that's physically something or mentally.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:18 PM
2

Okay! So tell me how my statement is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:18 PM
0

Its not a think. There is hard physically statistical proof for this statement. Women marry up not down. Women date up not down. Whether they its a physical aspect or mental aspect
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:17 PM
-2

Grow up is a personal attack. It adds nothing to the discussion
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:16 PM
-4

Yes women in general are fatter as well. Your acting as if women stayed the same. Men are the ones declining. Both equally. So the idea is the same
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:15 PM
3

So what you don't understand is that you don't need to survey millions of women to get a good idea. Can get close to a 99% confidence interval off a few 1000 to get a good idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:14 PM
2

Sure I'll mainsplain! More than implies more than you. Which means what?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:11 PM
0

Nope multiple times the guy was shorter, skinnier, bummier. Overall a bad match. However the guy who treated her right(attractive) was left for someone who treated her worse. It happens whether the girl is mentally ill or not
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:10 PM
1

Kindness in general is unattractive. Women care about looks yes but not to the extent of how a man's attracted to looks
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:09 PM
1

Thanks for your comment!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:08 PM
0

They say they want however statistically that's not what they choose. Consistently date for power dynamics. Essentially " more than"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:08 PM
-2

Well statistic wise shows women value power and looking at a general statement women normally all say. Women only marry up across all metrics and women always say things like taller than makes more money etc. All examples of power dynamics
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:07 PM
-1

Society acts as if. Didn't say I believe so. Please, no personal attacks. Gonna watch as PPD mods pick and choose and not remove ur comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:06 PM
0

Well stats say otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:05 PM
1

Do you really think nature selected women to want money? Logically doesn't make sense
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:04 PM
2

Socially you can't tell whose performative and who isn't. It's mostly mental gymnastics people used to justify not liking them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:04 PM
-8

If that was the case, human nature would have selected men to have that. However testosterone (what nature selected for) increases dominance
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:03 PM
1

That is an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:02 PM
5

Based off data and women's mouth. Women prefer taller than, makes more than, social status more than. They marry only those who do this. So it's a generalization based on quantifiable stats
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:01 PM
1

For you. Not the experience of most men
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:00 PM
-1

It does. I've seen attractive men who are nice get nothing or cheated on many times.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:00 PM
-2

Outdated stereotypes that are somehow backed by data. Women marry above not below.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:00 PM
0

Most romance books are based on that model and women say that in their preferences. Taller than, makes more money than etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:59 PM
-1

I did make it simplistic. However I agree to an extent. I sincerely believe most women would rather be with a abusive strong man. Than a caring weak man.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:58 PM
2

chivalry us a form of kindness. No I'm saying if your kind in general it sets you back.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:57 PM
12

Women are the ones who statistically only date those on same social class or someone higher, more money, taller and etc. Women date through power dynamics men do not
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:56 PM
1

I mean they're synonyms for a reason. You can't just adjust each to fit your narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:55 PM
1

Taller than, makes more money than and all the things women want relate to power dynamics
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:55 PM
6

All men still statistic wise are doing better than women. The average man is still better than the average woman. Even accounting for women getting more degrees
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 09:20 PM
–

This is about western ideals
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 09:10 PM
2

100% of the time and it always bites me in the ass. Women will sleep with you however your not rewarded with honesty. Actually lose a lot who would otherwise want me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 12:54 AM
3

Hips, feminine face, and breast's of varying sizes. All things to assert womanhood
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 06:42 PM
-1

More than* "mods this is not contentless rhetoric stop removing when people are personally attacking and you guys leave it up" More than means power dynamic traits
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 06:37 PM
2

way younger
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 06:35 PM
2

Men don't like those supermodels. Women do. Men fall for a specific type
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 06:35 PM
2

Not the normal. Statistically speaking. Women say they don't like that
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:36 PM
0

Women choose for these traits. Again
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:36 PM
0

Yes because a few women did it means the whole did. Let's look at small offshoot tribes and call that a majority of what women did
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:35 PM
1

All followed feminine ideals. Every single one. I have yet to see a culture where they like women with no hips and etc to signal sexual reproduction
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:31 PM
2

Men and women have a role. Yet women will denounce there's and call it different
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:30 PM
–

NUH UH -alwayright0
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:29 PM
0

Pornography can essentially "teach" men what is desirable for the appearance of female genitals. This can result in men finding substantial public hair on women gross, even though it grows naturally, and even though it was typically considered sexy decades ago. Most men will not care if a woman comes with some. I have never heard of a man who liked a woman before but then she took off her pants and he said "ew hair" and left. That made me laugh just thinking
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:19 PM
–

I don't think you understand what arguing in good faith means
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:17 PM
1

Women don't physically create violence, but emotionally. If a woman is scared of X. Men go fight off X
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:15 PM
1

Does that actually happen for other short men? No even if your attractive facially, being short is seen as irreversible
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:14 PM
1

This planet. Women have just as much vitriol to outsiders and topics they dont like . Then cause a bunch of emotional turmoil then turn to the men to do the dirty work.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:06 PM
1

Yes let's pick special parts of history and instances. Your not arguing in good faith. Women are just as racist, have just as much vitriol as men. However the men are the ones capable and do the dirty work for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:06 PM
2

You understand that a man may say yes go fight but women are the ones yelling for war as well. Civil War in US? Women didn't think blacks as people. Called for war. Arabs with twin towers? Women calling for their men to go kill Arabs. Men have always did the dirty work so it's easy to place blame all on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:04 PM
0

is incorrect because the size difference already occurred PRIOR TO HUMANS, are you understanding this or not??? Our ancestors choice this. Understand? Then when homosapiens emerged we kept that. It's that smaller males get killed off by predators or competing males, leaving the bigger males as the ones who can stick around and mate. only for some. humans did not develop this way. hence our bigger brains. Even in chimpanzees (and other animal species), females DO mate with smaller males. It's jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:02 PM
0

Yes let's look at two personal books and take that as the whole. I understand ancient Rome did like to sculpt bigger body types. But they ultimately still follow feminine ideals. Male preference has always followed a rigid basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:57 PM
0

women and men
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:53 PM
1

women and men
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:53 PM
2

Women and men. Men get the blame but let's look at recent events. Women were also right next to men yelling at Arabs calling for war. Women right next to the men wanted to keep their slaves for their lifestyle and asked for war.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:52 PM
–

Historical systems caused nature I'm just gonna leave this here. This is all anyone needs to see. This isn't logical at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:49 PM
-5

Because drum roll please..... women select for it. Appmorpous trait just means new. That does not prove what you think it does
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:49 PM
-2

Yes let's use powerful short men to show women like short men and power isn't a necessary component. You just logical don't create good arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:44 PM
0

Historical systems do not outweigh nature. The fact you believe men have that power shows hypocrisy that you believe men have more power than they do
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:43 PM
0

So you cannot teach things that are inherent to humans. For example, I cannot teach you not to breathe. I cannot teach you how to think and behave like a man. It can be replicated but you will never be a perfect copy. Biology/nature does that. TLDR: Nature decides innate sexual and necessary physical functions, and nobody can change that. They can only use what you have and persuade you along with that original though process.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:42 PM
2

Agreed. It has its positives and negatives
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:38 PM
2

Comment doesn't follow any logical sense. She believes that men have the power to change HER innate preferences. Preferences nature gave her. I don't think you understand what she's implying.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:37 PM
1

No I blame women who ask for something. Then take no accountability for their choices and actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:34 PM
-4

Additionally, males are not held to a "standard" of being taller than women. They just ARE taller than women. It's a sexually dimorphic trait, Its sad I have to tell you what creates sexual dimoprhism. Let's give you a small gist. Women choose certain traits to have sex with, they become the dominant force over time. So yes it was a conscious choice created by women over many 1000s of years. Based off the need for power dynamics
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:33 PM
0

You actually are. If more women were like you patriarchy would fall
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:29 PM
1

I've seen plenty of men love big women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:29 PM
4

Most reasonable paragraph I've seen. Everyone plays a part.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:28 PM
2

There's no coherent logical reasoning to these paragraph. I cannot give a reasonable reply. You think men, made you like this? Not nature. Even within this paragraph your subconsciously admitting you view men as a power dynamic. Like they have this all knowing power to make women a certain way
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:28 PM
3

You understand women also fight in the army don't you? A small percentage and we had to lower requirements to get them in. The thing is, this us against them mentally is stupid. Get your head out of wherever it is, This post is just calling out a fact. If you feel it's us vs them then it's on you. However what we're not gonna do is blame men for it when women have more to do with it then they own up to
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:25 PM
2

Past modern tools women couldn't go to a nice office job and support herself. Supporting yourself meant hard grueling physically labor and hunting large game. Things women cannot do alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:23 PM
–

Yet u probably still look for power dynamics statistically
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:19 PM
2

No be open to. Just like men are open to. Men don't say things like. Her ass needs to be fatter than mine. Or she needs to be X than me. The only time we do is shorter in height because we know women think less of us first off.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:16 PM
0

Studies have consistently known that most people date within their pre-existing socio-economic sphere. Which makes sense, since the people we spend the most time with (and thus have a higher chance of falling for someone) are our contemporaries. No people choose to hang out with who they want. We interact daily but people choose to sit in cliques? Why because women push for this behavior. I mean... most men ARE taller than women and already make more than womne. It would take more work for a wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:14 PM
-7

but it’s an inherited system of power from a time when only men were legal individuals in the eyes of the law/society. That’s historical fact In which historical time are we talking? Last time I checked Men in general have always been disposable. Cannon fodder for the women children and a small percent of powerful men. ou’re using modern dating techniques to validate your claim that women created the patriarchy? You understand women's preferences haven't changed. This want for a power dynamic is…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:11 PM
3

No it is not. Even within white culture. Men kept women at home as a privilege because they didn't want them to face the harshness of life. Mens life span especially through European history has always been vastly shorter compared to a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:06 PM
3

Tallness is not a redeeming quality. Money for a lavish lifestyle is not redeeming. I'm not giving any impression I just dislike those who complain about their own choices
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:05 PM
2

Actually strengthens. Most marriages the man is taller, the man makes more money, same social status or higher. Also as a roided up person this a lie. Most normal people don't know what roids look like. Some examples are Michael B Jordan, Chris Hemsworths, Tate brothers, Chris Evans, Jonathan Majors, Zac Efron, Idris Elbis, Terry Crews, Henry Cavill, Jason Mamoa(off and on). So many more
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:04 PM
1

What you seem to not understand is that the world isn't nice. Your able to safely work and study due to men fighting in war. You understand that right? If there was a place with no men, women would soon learn how horrible the world can be
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:01 PM
0

Please refrain from emotional replies. Where did I say they reject me?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 03:51 PM
-4

Yep you guys are why women struggle and you don't even know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 03:50 PM
–

Mhm trying to backtrack. Women are there own worse enemies.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 03:47 PM
-4

You just reduced many women as having a sad life. So much for women empowerment
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 03:37 PM
2

but it made it easier
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 12:42 AM
7

A scientific concept isn't real lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 12:10 AM
1

Yes words mean nothing. Data means everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 08:01 PM
0

Not scapegoating women. Women have largely been the problem. Those and simps. Pain is the first step to a solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 08:01 PM
1

If the overwhelming tone of red pill spaces today is blame, obsession, and victimhood, then that is the lived reality of the ideology not whatever ideal version people still cling to. You understand it's a process? Anybody told something entirely different from what they're used to will lash out. Those who don't care typically don't post. They've moved on. Just because you see the emotional few online doesn't mean there aren't countless others who benefit It’s like watching a movement evolve, ro…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 07:07 PM
1

No the redpill is an idea made by an agreed upon culture. Defined earlier which is shown where redpill came from(reddit forum/sosuave etc). Just because other people take it and misconstrue it, doesn't make that version the truth. It's the equivalent of changing a defined word in the dictionary
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 06:19 PM
1

Content is content. Whatever makes people click going to be successful. Therefore people make them. The original website and ebook is out there. You're going to try and convince me otherwise, but we see the truth. What your doing is choosing to only see what you want. Regardless of what the original content is about
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 03:47 PM
1

So you took one post. The people who are more likely to post are mad btw, then came to the conclusion that those few are all of red pill? The whole premise of redpill is to work on yourself and not chase girls as power/value is king
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 03:17 PM
-1

Women are not fearful around men. For example I fear snakes. Would I go to a snake enclosure? No. Yet women love to go to the club around not just regular men but drunk men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 02:31 PM
1

Would you say two incomes is normally better than one? Same concept
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 06:42 AM
–

So a subsection of men and most women. Women know these men aren't shit but will still run to them
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 03:55 AM
–

Yes so a couple women go to 1 man. They're not aware but that's normally how it goes. So statistically men are less happy and women are "fine".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 03:48 AM
–

Situations are more likely to happen depending on the gender. I have never met a woman truly single. There is always something there, whether there's emotional or sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 03:31 AM
–

Single does not mean alone. Single for women equals a man just no title. Single for men means actually alone. Get it?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 03:14 AM
–

At my high school, I noticed something very interesting. You can't assert a claim with this little data. Especially saying "my highschool"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 02:53 AM
3

Just because there's an industry(money to be made) doesn't mean they aren't also villanized. Same as guys getting prostitues.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 01:41 AM
–

Most virgins do not want to be virgins(from the male perspective). Having sex at least once makes people feel worthy. Being a virgin and not getting any causes a whole host of mental issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 05:12 PM
5

Well you don't represent the majority. Women show a preference for taller than, makes more money than, confidence and etc. All power dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 03:34 PM
5

No, because whether men lash out or not, women will keep their innate preferences. Its just course correction. We've went so far into helping women, nature is starting to course correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 03:24 PM
3

Men=fall in love with looks. Women=fall in love with power. Both are just as superficial but pan out different
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 03:14 PM
5

Many men are just angry because women and society have lied about what they like and what they are. You're just seeing groups of men lash out. However, most do not truly feel this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 03:13 PM
3

Social media has made the barrier of entry for all things higher. If you've seen 6'8 a lot. 6'2 becomes nothing special, despite being rare. For example, real natural gym physique are rarely appreciated now. People gravitate towards the inhuman tiny waist or big bbl and etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 03:08 PM
–

Its not a direct attack on you. It's a discussion on flaws in your assessment. It comes from a place of "I experience so it must be true". When all data points to your statement being false.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 08:02 AM
–

In the WEST. Where every opportunity is literally handed to them, they have access to do whatever they want to do given some hard work. Sometimes it’s truly difficult to take westerners seriously omg. Hard work does not equal success and trends point toward no home ownership and the west has the worse social mobility of most countries. You literally applied it to me talking about my experiences “working a job for a day for free.” And it’s not for free, we are “paid” by our employer to go volunte…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 07:56 AM
–

Your experience is not validity for the whole. Very egocentric to think my general statement has to directly apply to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 07:29 AM
–

Men make more money in most marriages and incur most of the debt. Despite women being more educated. You say men aren't expected to be breadwinners, but data says otherwise. In addition most of the life saving care, inventions and other things were invented by men. All to save others. Women however never want to take responsibility for a society in which they help create. I don't think you see the privilege in being able to work in a low paying job or do a job for a day for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 07:13 AM
–

Women working does not= care. First most non profit are social jobs which women inherently work more in. Second non profits pay lower and as men are expected to be the breadwinner, will naturally not be able to work these jobs. Thirdly teachers don't get paid enough and men will not be able to work those jobs do to society standards. Also led? These are mainly led by men staffed by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 07:06 AM
2

I can't possibly cover every facet of being selfish. With every descriptive word/emotions there's positives and negatives. I came in giving the audience the benefit of the doubt being educated in that fact
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 07:11 PM
1

This isn't an incel mindset but very prevalent with younger generations. Its a spectrum, but being nice gets you nothing except leftovers typically.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 07:07 PM
1

selfish doesn't have to mean irresponsible and careless but can be. Selfishness manifests itself in different ways to your detriment or benefit. I think it's kind of self implied. Same with like any other word.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 07:06 PM
2

I identify asshole as selfish. In my opinion, selfishness is the prerequisite to competence and maximum value.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 10:13 PM
2

I don't need to report back if I've been doing it for years
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:44 AM
1

Good job not all thugs, criminals or gangsters get girls
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:01 AM
1

commie crap I'll leave this here and we'll leave this conversation here
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:00 AM
1

For attractiveness not sexual attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 11:38 PM
2

Do you understand Microsoft and Apples whole gameplay was to undercut competition. Funding to make sure better competitive phones never hit the market(Huawei) and much more were implemented.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:53 PM
2

I don't think you live in reality. Walmart, Target, Food lion, and many more did exactly what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:18 PM
1

Assholes can be nice because its beneficial in that timeframe. Its a pick and choose scenario. However when it comes down to a you vs them scenario, it's always gonna be you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:26 PM
1

Yes to dominate a market in sales you must undercut all competition and try and buy low sell high. Economics 101. The point being is an asshole isn't an asshole to everybody as selfishness benefits him and others that associate with him
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:22 PM
1

Majority of people are crappy in some fashion. Most people do what's best for them. Nothing wrong with it but does create situations where you become crappy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:21 PM
2

You just said that most people who are nice get run over, I apologize i should have prefaced that this was a male centric post and the contents apply to men. Obviously you do think these women are highly value to men. sorry I misspoke. I meant if women want to climb the social ladder they can't be the nice women that men want. But if we go with your view, you believe the choice for women is essentially between either offering yourself up to be looked down on and get walked on My advice for women…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:19 PM
2

Women who want to climb the social ladder are typically not good people. So yes if a woman wants personal power the same advice applies. However for dating, power is not attractive to men. I don't believe anybody is above or below me. I just do things that work. Do you think most men treat women who are gentle and feminine and kind worse than you treat women who are assholes? Wouldn't say most men but some definitely do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 04:53 PM
2

can you define an asshole without being selfish? Even a jerk? If you can't seperate the two then they are the same or a core trait
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 04:50 PM
3

Its been very hard to. But I believe as a man gets older he desires something entirely different than just sex. So he can be
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 04:16 PM
1

I have no studies to back this but I believe women/children are responsible for creating strong behavior in men. Nobody wants to be strong all the time because it's a burden. Society in general dictates your behavior to a degree. So it's really no different than what your doing
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 04:06 PM
1

A man's job is to adapt. Men use conscious decisions to improve their situations. This can be good for both casual or monogamy, depending on where you choose to fall on the spectrum
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:59 PM
1

Women choose better than. Patriarchy is men in higher positions. If women want men in higher positions and men fit that bill. That means women selected for a trait, got it, and now mad at the outcome
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:57 PM
1

It says everything about you that you believe that being nice is the same as being weak. In the post nowhere, did i say I believe niceness is weak. I said others tend to view you as weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:57 PM
1

nice doesn't mean weak, hope this helps I agree however many people take it that way
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:56 PM
2

I think your the one with the teenage experience. This world is always led by some of the worst individuals historically and that continues to today. Those with the "biggest hearts" never lead
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:55 PM
1

It reflects every success story. As selfishness(asshole) is a prerequisite to any above average goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:54 PM
1

No you didn't read. I said being an asshole(selfish) is a prerequisite to power.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:53 PM
1

never set treat others badly. In other comments I define asshole and every other word I used.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:51 PM
5

Power is the ability to change a circumstance. I say asshole is at a basic definition, selfishness. So selfishness is the prerequisite to all above average actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:40 PM
1

Of course the ones who disagree will comment. Reddit or online is not a great place to prove or test this theory
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:38 PM
0

An asshole can't be defined without being selfish. That's a defining trait of all assholes. Not all assholes are rude but some are. Not all assholes are nice but some are. They're all selfish though
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:36 AM
0

The benefit is that you get women. Do the opposite and your back to same drawing board. Alone. Its nice to think you can break the rules but mother nature has rules laid out and either you follow or not get whatever u want
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:12 AM
3

In no study does for the purpose of sex and initial attraction does nice align. Its the worse approach as most men quickly find out
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:03 AM
3

No an asshole doesn't have to "treat everyone like shit". For example. If you decide to go play basketball instead of your friends birthday. What kind of behavior is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:02 AM
1

All of those traits have to be developed. Success is relative. Funny is relative. Charisma is relative. Do you know what sets you apart and give you the ability to learn and be above others? You guessed it. Selfishness. You have to practice and put your needs before others.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 07:00 AM
2

Well of course if you add your own definitions to it then no. You can't have any of that without focusing on yourself. Which is what? You guessed it selfish
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 06:58 AM
7

What kind of world do you live in. Musk is the least from compotent but was put in his position because his father stole from others and had a blood diamond mine. Trump and many other rich families are only in their positions due to selfish reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 06:57 AM
0

Not all over the map with nomenclature. I have said time and time again asshole(selfish) are the same and not rude. Assholes can be rude but that is not the defining feature. You can be rude and it's just called being rude. An asshole can not be an asshole without selfish behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 06:55 AM
2

If we’re all trying to get ass, which often are, being nice among a competing field of incapable men works too well in the current climate to ever risk not obtaining casual sex by abiding by what this post promot In this statement your acting as if nice sets you apart. Denoting that it's rare behavior. It is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 06:53 AM
1

I'm arguing that assholes get things because they are assholes. As selfishness is the bare minimum for every above average goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 06:05 AM
1

Yes but isn't social status and everything u said afterwards a form of power?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 05:55 AM
1

Every man is nice. Your acting as if nice sets you apart, when that's 95% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 05:54 AM
1

There's a reason why higher management positions they're never nice. Nice gets you where ur at. An asshole gets the management position. More than likely
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 05:52 AM
2

Putting your needs first is by definition an asshole and definitely selfish.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 05:50 AM
1

I agree however I'm giving two extremes so people can see and choose where they want to be on the spectrum. You can only choose which side when your aware of both sides of the spectrum. This is why I talk in absolutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 05:49 AM
3

An asshole(selfishness) is a prerequisite to power. Power is a competition and in any competition those who want it more than others win out.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 05:48 AM
-1

Being selfish(asshole)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 05:47 AM
0

a cunt and a asshole is very different. A cunt is just being rude. An asshole is selfish behavior. Things like putting yourself first. Prioritize your needs and etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 05:47 AM
1

It is the baseline prerequisite to get power since power is a competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 05:46 AM
4

Again I said sexual attractiveness. Sexual success is largely been correlated with dominance
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 04:37 AM
2

I'm defining two poles so people can find where they want to be on the spectrum. For example like being hot and cold. However in dating most people don't know so they can't really choose what to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 04:37 AM
-1

That depends on your definition of healthy. If you want to be rich then that balance leans more to selfishness. Rich or success is in relation to others. Having more than others. Which means leaning more toward an extreme
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 04:34 AM
2

I appreciate your opinion! I just follow what most women actually like. You may be different but statistically, power is rewarded
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 04:10 AM
-2

You can however it takes a lot of social nuance that isn't applicable for everyone. Especially starting off. In general it's way harder when you can default to an easier solution
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:54 AM
1

Its exactly how I'm presenting it. As I start off saying power is shown in different ways. Its from the mental standpoint of that particular woman
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:43 AM
-1

Great studies! I just wish the studies previously accounted if women already found them powerful and confident when thinking of the nice man.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:42 AM
3

The only issue I have with those studies is when women put down they like niceness. Do they envision the man already being powerful? It's one of the core things every study looks over
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:41 AM
4

Power is a competition. In a competition those who do anything to win, win. Those who do not lose. Asshole or selfishness is the bare minimum to win in a competitive environment. Confidence is a side effect but you see many powerful people who are not. Look at Elon musk who fakes things to be liked. However powerful people are always selfish. Only in rare circumstances are they not
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:39 AM
3

Right I'm no longer sitting at home wondering if somethings wrong with me. But now that I'm doing well every feminist/woman hates I give this advice. Although my girlfriend is very happy. Nothing better than really understanding the opposite sex and being able to give them what they truly want.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:20 AM
3

you aren't naturally an asshole you'll just end up demoralizing yourself. Would be true if you identify with a personality. However, personalities are fluid and not static. You're personality is just a conscious choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:18 AM
0

Focusing on your self is the literal defining trait of an asshole. Just because you like it and try and rebrand it doesn't make it different. If my friends wanna go out and I don't care I wanna do what I want. That is by definition what?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:16 AM
0

Strength is whatever the woman mentally prefers. Does not have to be a standard model.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:14 AM
–

They are not, and I have a nice girlfriend who loves me. Previously I would have not gotten one with the terrible advice people try and give. No where did I say I want a high body count. That's what you assume. Never did I say women are a commodity. That's again what you assume
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:59 AM
6

Women never want just an equal. They ask for a partner with more than. So now you have statistics where in most couples the man makes more. The man more than likely has a similar or higher education and much more.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:57 AM
–

Very well, which is why I'm posting this so other struggling men can learn.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:53 AM
5

What women says i like my man weaker than me. I like my man shorter than me. I like my man to make less money than me. It's normally the opposite. So yes it's true
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:52 AM
13

The most successful men are selfish(asshole) by default. To work on your craft means to prioritize your needs over all others. How do you think most actors got so good. Athletes, entertainers and everyone women love?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:52 AM
–

That's fine. Some people have mentalities that only want them to see flowers and nice things. However power is the only thing that ensures safety.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:50 AM
0

Well power is held to those who want it. Which means striving for it. Those who are selfish(assholes) succeed way more than those who are nice. So it's basically straightforward
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:49 AM
1

An asshole at its core is just someone who is selfish. Which isn't bad in itself. I think people associate it with being rude which is not the case at all
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:48 AM
4

Well then why do most studies show dominance to be correlated with sexual success and not looks?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:47 AM
3

Not everything but putting your needs before others.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:46 AM
2

One attracts more in general. An asshole has a choice of both. Selfishness(asshole) is a prerequisite to success
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:46 AM
2

I mean experience is great but selfish is literally a prerequisite to success or rich. Rich means to have excess of and success means you have to prioritize yourself. Each selfish traits(asshole).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:44 AM
8

Not necessarily. Seen plenty of times where taller girls get their girls taken. I'm one of those "taller" guys whose girl got taken as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:43 AM
2

Yes your correct loud mouth dominant women does turn men off relationship wise not sexually. For women it turns you off completely. However your general take is how majority of women think. Thanks for your honest input. Assholes and the preference for also is on a spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:42 AM
6

That would make sense if all women didn't have a general preference. The general preference of more than which represents a power dynamic. Good girls and bad girls like the same things.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:40 AM
5

I'd believe you if stats and experience said otherwise. Rich by definition, means to be selfish. Success in general leans towards selfishness(assholes). Not only this niceness never correlates to sexual experience but dominance does.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 02:39 AM
4

No, every man knows he wants a hot woman. We embraced we were a POS because women and society told us we were. In some ways we are. However, society told us an entirely different view of women that was very wrong. Red Pill was the outrage that followed. The problem was we were always the fault and women never at fault. Men die at war? What will the women do. Less men going to college? Where will the women find eligible men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 01:42 AM
–

Please provide something useful. That sentence speaks volumes. Can't argue in good faith, so resort to "touch grass" insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 01:40 AM
-4

Sorry to say but this isn't true for most people. Most people who are nice get ran over. Precisely because people believe they are beneath them. The etymology of nice literally means ignorant/stupid for that simple reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 01:38 AM
2

Agreed. I'd argue it's better to be fat but good socially then the opposite. To an extent
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 01:22 AM
2

Its clear-cut guidelines, though sometimes overly rigid, reduce the room for moral ambiguity. While the blue pill system offers nuance and depth, it also requires a level of self-scrutiny that many find challenging to maintain consistently. I don't know where your getting this from. Blue pill was all about "Just being yourself" so idk where this depth is coming from. Red Pill doesn't scrutinize however gives a toolbox to navigate social situations. What you do is up to you. Now, many of them ind…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 12:53 AM
1

Money doesn’t buy happiness” is what I’m saying her This thinking needs to stop. Every day I'm sad I get to hop in my dream car or maybe take a trip to my favorite place with no worries. Do you really think that's not better than getting by or having just enough. They’re not into you for you, they’re into the material stuff you can bring Can say the same thing for looks, can say the same thing for a "personality". What if they like you for being strong then one day your not? its cope for the sim…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 12:44 AM
1

In general terms, power is what makes a man attractive. What age do you think you'll be physically decent with the most power?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 12:36 AM
-1

Pretty simple. Men who want long term relationships=care about how you dress. Men who want short term= don't care. How you dress is how you want to be marketed.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 03:21 AM
1

what I’ve seen red pill people focus on looks and status, and blue pill people focus on personality and interests. Then you fundamentally don't understand Redpill at all or bluepill for that matter. People are not jaded or sad because of the game. They're just mad the rules to the game were false in the beginning. One of those rules being "just be yourself"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 03:19 AM
0

No woman unless they're doing something like karate. Will ever have your same idiotic views. In any MMA or fighting circle, PEDs are rampant with Testosterone use and other steroids. So you'd know about the tiny bit of how hormones affect you and your fighting ability.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 01:23 AM
1

Alright Mrs hewoman. If you wanna operate in fantasy land then this conversation is done already.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 11:58 PM
1

Yes despite what you think violence will always be there. Even if only women. Look at lesbian couples who report the highest Domestic violence rate. You may be capable of violence but nowhere near an average man. Even if he's 5'6 and your 6'2
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 08:59 PM
-2

Women choose not to date men on horrible standards. That is not choosing better. For example, if you want loyalty? Don't ask for confidence. Confidence comes from repeated actions(dating a lot).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 08:04 AM
3

Without men, there would be no society. Whether you understand it or not, America and western freedom is due to widespread genocide and violence. Violence in general is the only thing that ensures safety for a group of people. Women alone are not capable of the violence necessary to protect or hold a society.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 08:00 AM
1

You don't know whose dating behind closed doors. You can only assume. Two male friends who hangout a lot could be gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 10:13 PM
3

That's your friend group. Sounds like a special type. A lot of people who you think are straight and swear by it aren't. They never tell their parents friends or anybody
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 08:41 PM
-3

Sure create your own definitions to fit narratives. A friend does not have to be a "best friend"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 06:59 PM
-3

Your whole argument is predicated on "ifs" and many times being gay is vilified so nobody ever comes out and says "yea I'm gay". That's the minority. Your acting as if being bi and gay is socially accepted when it's largely not. You keep that double life private
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 06:24 PM
1

Are you normally socially adjusted? Where did I say I personally fail? My friends we typically keep private life private and just enjoy each other's company. Unless they need to vent.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 05:44 PM
0

Please stop using the term patriarchy it's a term people use to devoid themselves of any personal responsibility. However, yes, most women think this way, and you can can prove it with your own social experiment. Ask women in person do they think most men who approach them want to have sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 05:42 PM
8

I don't think you ask people their sexuality. That's not a question in a normal friendship
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 05:39 PM
1

So no I see what your getting at. However I don't subscribe to normal religion. Both men and women are horrible differently but equally. I don't know why you guys are arguing that women are angels and men are these evil demons solely
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 12:07 AM
-2

Well, women's social perks are contingent on them being an image. Women are protected because they're seen as pure and helpless, switch that then what's the point of giving her those special privileges for free. We apply the same rhetoric for men in other areas. For example, "Why should I help him, he's a man" and etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 02:42 AM
2

i don't think that's necessarily true. Men don't deal with emotional things like that with other Men. It's normally parents and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 01:51 AM
7

I agree as well. Most male violence does come from prior emotional violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 01:47 AM
–

Again if the IQ isn't there. You'll never understand
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 01:18 AM
–

again, what? what are you trying to say here? Are you drunk? If the IQ isn't there I cant explain it to you. If this is true, then you should be content catering to the whims of women. How do you feel about that? How I feel has no bearing on how nature created me. I'm glad to be male and there's a good reason why nature encoded it in most men. It's necessary. the feminist movement shed light on the severity of SA. Don't kid yourself. Without feminists you would never be able to speak about this …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 01:16 AM
3

Its a common thing in law enforcement. If the husband comes up missing or boyfriend. They go to the girlfriend or wife. Not because they did it but because they normally know who did it and are involved. People have trends and that's facts. This isn't based off how I feel or view others through feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 12:52 AM
6

You don't care about male victims of sexual assault if the only time you think of them is to use their experiences as a weapon. Its disgusting and you all need to stop with this bullshit. Well Red Pill is one of the 1st movements to even shed light on the topic. Previously those men were shunned and told to man up, or men cant be r worded. Let's play devils advocate and say we are using their experience. It still did more than any woman has ever done for men's plight. Expectations, meaning cultu…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 12:50 AM
1

Women are typically emotionally violent, men physically. However, emotional violence is harder to quantify. In my experience and many males experience, a woman is sometimes involved in a crime but due to no laws about emotional abuse it's never reported.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 12:42 AM
4

I think women are more emotionally violent. Men physically. However you can get vice versa too
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 12:33 AM
5

It's objectively true that all the worst criminals are men. True, however, reported crime doesn't equal total crime. Most women dont do crime they manipulate their man to do so. Even in everyday life, I see more women who are empathetic than men This refers to your inability to see men's role. Also empathy isn't something shown but given. Men are stereotypically more likely to do something for the person and not placate someone with blank emotions. "how exactly did women harm you?". Most of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 12:12 AM
20

I think you have the wrong idea about TRP. The whole premise is that Men KNEW they were monsters and constantly reminded of it. However, men who subscribe to TRP ideology were told women are good, especially in comparison to men. They are outraged to find out women are just as bad or even worse than men sometimes
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 11:33 PM
5

Canada isn't that much different from the US. Just colder
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 09:56 PM
1

Not gonna read a dissertation, so I'm gonna go off the last two paragraphs as your premise. This SMV narrative sounds nice to those who don't put themselves out. The reality is for sex at least, You can get rejected by 3s and still pull 8s.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 09:54 PM
3

Nobody is good for the sake of being good. If you believe that, then your experience is limited, and you're incredibly naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 10:28 PM
4

Kamala, slept her way to the top? Laughs about putting innocent people in jail. Taylor swift who never can have a stable relationship and always blames everyone but herself. AOC is okay. Oprah if being selfish billionaire is okay then fine. If showing your nudes is okay in movies than online then Anne is fine I guess. Same with Ashley Judd and Emma Watson. Cooking with Kya has done none. She just does what she likes and cooks food
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 09:39 PM
3

What clean the house, close you legs and look presentable. And don't act aggressive. Other than that it wasn't much
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 08:31 AM
2

Well, people here and especially women , don't tell you the difference between being attractive and sexually attractive. They're the same for a woman. However opposite for a man. Beauty=/Partners for a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 07:43 PM
1

Oh combining both sure but cold has many benefits even outside of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 03:50 PM
-3

I still cold approach. All this is, is cope. Living on a college campus, i went from a virgin. To 4-8 different girls a semester. You don't have to be "chad". You just have to meet the looks requirement and be there at the right time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 02:18 PM
3

If you base your actions about what others say about you(which your implying), then he's already proved his point.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 01:27 AM
–

During sex I can do whatever I want normally. Porn isn't the cause. It's just when someone tries to be nice and it fails multiple times, they look for other ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 03:19 PM
2

IQ is learned behavior. Typically, people who are enveloped in academics. Women won't go lower in anything they find important(strong). So of course this is the result.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 12:13 AM
10

and women are always worried about what men should do with their bodies for them. No need to harbor hate when both parties do a version of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/24 02:44 AM
1

It is gonna work. How can you claim something you never tried? Judging by my last statement, this is a self esteem issue and not you "knowing" anything
/r/seduction19/07/24 05:12 PM
2

Women feel as though someone isn't doing there part. So they throw it on anything they can. However the real reason is they no longer see their husband in a certain light. Therefore, it leads to feelings of unequal unexchange. Even if the man did cook, clean etc. It would never fix the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 08:48 PM
0

It's not, most people don't know themselves let alone the real reason for divorces. The real reason is apparent. See the lesbian vs gay divorce rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 08:42 PM
–

Your saying things like paid time off for pregnancy. Which would be a feature only women get. Which is in turn sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 10:51 PM
–

(flexible hours instead of 9-5, community childcare, shared parenting where its not just women picking up kids during work hours). that would mean extra things for women again. They don't accommodate men. It would be sexist to accommodate women actually. Then you'd be treating women different based on their sex. Which is actually sexism if women have less access to the resources of a community, and men have more access... that's sexism So if a man works more than a woman and now has more resourc…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 10:41 PM
1

Go to clubs, care little for the opposites genders preference and words, remember most girls will not be down that night or week, get in the gym. Do those things and you can
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 03:32 AM
9

She can't is the problem. Women complain about dating for that very reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 05:07 PM
0

And trp was the one that came up with the 80/20 rule initially. With the goal to be in the top 20% via self improvement. People FROM trp is the difference. Nothing works for everyone. So if I tell someone advice to wash there ass to not stink? It doesn't apply to everyone? Let's be real here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:27 PM
19

Difference between healthy competition and competing with unrealistic standards
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:19 PM
1

Then you fundamentally misunderstand what TRP is. TRP works for every man, as last time I recall the sidebar never had 80/20% jargon. The core tenant of TRP was alpha(power) was the main thing that mattered
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:18 PM
1

No, something could be easy to do yet risky. For example sky diving. Then the opposite can occur, for example higher level mathematics.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:14 PM
2

It's not purely genetics and looks. TRP isn't the black pill. For TRP it was mainly stated to be actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:01 PM
2

No everybody has that. With the advent of social media, you need to look like you have excess of wealth. Trips all the time, nice card, happy family w money etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:00 PM
1

more risk does not mean harder. It's the definitions you don't get
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 03:58 PM
6

never said 23 but at 30 you have responsibilities which shifts women's thinking
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 07:01 AM
13

The prerequisite past 30 to be a cool guy is to have money. Beta bux doesn't mean not cool. It means someone who is weak. It's not people aren't saying cool people don't matter but the standard of cool changes when everyone in your age demographic has financial responsibilities
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:40 AM
1

status is relative and back then women thought every men had status above them. So not necessarily
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 08:52 PM
0

Not only. Monogamy is only created through male enforcement. When women become the majority. That enforcement isn't there because there isn't enough men to enforce it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 08:13 PM
-1

Monopolize assets and therefore women and the place that carried the most men would inherently have the advantage. If they are bad men then say goodbye to any autonomy women could have. Having other men deter that opportunity. Also a quote from a book "For his first book, “Date-onomics,” Birger studied this phenomenon in the perfect control setting: college campuses. He found that when there are more women than men on campus, students’ dating behavior is oriented more toward hookup culture and l…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 07:06 PM
2

Women have a need to claim a man she deems powerful. It calms and completes their innate emotions
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 06:17 PM
0

Women vastly underestimate what a few men can do to a lot of women
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 06:15 PM
1

Gives too much power to men. What keeps men in line is other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 05:55 PM
1

whatever makes you believe your flawed belief.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 04:58 PM
1

Failing in general is negative. No need to hamster wheel it out. It can be positive. However, most don't believe it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:50 PM
3

Really so you think red pill men and women who hate men do so because they never had bad experiences around the opposite sex? Let's be realistic now
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:46 PM
0

By definition, option B is a hoe by description. A literally says inexperienced. Just cause your insecure does not mean you have sex. You have sex because you want to and can use any excuse in the book to cover it. Which is normally I'm insecure. Fact of the matter is everybody is insecure, however normal people won't use that as an excuse to have sex with everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:44 PM
8

Whose more likely to have baggage from past relationships. Young or old?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:41 PM
-2

Ones a maybe which is A. One is a guarantee which is B. Reason is, is confidence is obtained through doing the action over and over. If she's confident, guess what that means? That's just by definition
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:39 PM
2

failed relationships is the main one. But the normal life issues that could lead someone to hate on the opposite gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:33 PM
-2

High n without a hoe mindset. The first is gonna mess up your life sooner or later. The second although not perfect, a man can trust. However that is very rare to find a high n count women who isn't a hoe.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:27 PM
0

That is a very reasonable and logical decision. Seems like you're the rarer woman. However most women don't care as much. As long as you fulfill the idea in their head
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:24 PM
-5

being a hoe is a mindset, not necessarily body count. However the two are normally correlated
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:23 PM
-3

A. B means experience and by definition that means a hoe. Nobody wants that
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:14 PM
32

good answer but your gonna get responses of "it's not the same." Then proceed to list some evolutionary trait, that can still be applied to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:12 PM
17

With age comes baggage. Men don't like baggage. However, that's not to say some 18 year olds have more baggage than the 30-year-olds. It is rarer though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:10 PM
6

actually does. Similar to a bull when you castrate it, it becomes docile and never competes. Men compete because of the need for sex. So it translates
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 04:34 AM
8

Yes, more like women can sense power dynamics. That's why they complain about it so much because subconsciously it's apart of their everyday life
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 12:17 AM
1

Whats the core tenant of redpill then if you know it so well?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 04:20 AM
0

never said raw strength. Beating does not mean your hands. However it looks like you make up a story to believe what you want. With that in mind sure go ahead
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 04:19 AM
1

No because we beat monkeys with weapons. Power is the only thing respected in this world
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 04:15 AM
1

Then you haven't been around for much around the manosphere if that's what you think
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 04:14 AM
1

Manosphere is stereotyped to be heavily racist with white men leasing it
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 03:50 AM
1

Despite reality being documented showing me to be true. That I linked below. You still hold on to a false narrative because you "feel" it to be true. Who here is really driven by emotion and is illogical?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 05:24 AM
0

Naive? A large portion of the human experience is to produce and move their lineage on. You are downplaying the privileges woman had and increasing their disadvantages. Women now and forever always have agency because a woman is innately more valuable than a man
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 05:13 AM
0

no they generally did not. Men in all points in history have had it worse. Especially in white cultures. Most men didn't reproduce and many died in wars. Wars that were constantly fought for resources and a better life
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 05:06 AM
-1

Scroll down and see it's document history. Your rewriting history to act like all men suppressed women. If we did then that means we will continue to do so. Sorry to tell you women couldn't do a thing abt it
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 04:17 AM
0

Your notion that women aren't just as violent is from the belief woman are wonderful. Women know physically they can't compete with men so they do not go to war. Like other species if the women are more powerful they become just as violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 03:39 PM
1

Did you not see the laws that were created so men would want to go to war? Most men originally couldn't vote just like women. The only reason we got exempt is because of war. However women never went. You can also see thay with the continuation of laws today. All women can vote and be exempt from selective service. While ALL men have to be in selective service to vote
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 03:38 PM
0

Then read up on history. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription_in_the_United_States
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 02:58 PM
1

https://wisvetsmuseum.com/suffrage-through-service-how-military-service-expanded-voting-rights/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription_in_the_United_States
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 02:31 PM
1

I'll copy and paste the quote here to let you reread SLOWLY. Make sure to not gloss over any words. "It means as you increase testosterone those men prefer to be in higher dominant positions"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 01:59 PM
0

Reading comprehension at an all time low
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 01:48 PM
4

beating people up isn't power. it's just defaulting to basic means to get what you want in the short term. People with actual power don't need to come to blows Getting what u want is the definition of power. The ability to change circumstances to what you want. However no matter how much sense I talk to you. You want to believe your a victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 01:48 PM
0

you really just have a warped view of history. You think Men just go off to die because daddy government said so? If so then that's max delusion
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 01:47 PM
1

At first it was that. Then they let white men vote if they participated in war. The only people who truly have a fight against inequality is those dealing with race most the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 01:46 PM
0

I said selective service which is the draft with extra steps. This is in America. Also most govts have something similar. In everyone, women are exempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 01:43 PM
-1

no it does not. It means as you increase testosterone those men prefer to be in higher dominant positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 01:41 PM
-2

Didn't say there should or shouldn't however nature is that way. However you think somehow since your human, your exempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 06:25 AM
-2

Nobody has a "right" to anything. Yes power means everything. You wanna see what beating and real subjugation is? Go to some countries in the middle east. You wouldn't have a computer right now let alone be allowed to talk back to a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:59 AM
0

so the men who continue to go to war for women and children's protection died for who then? Your fantasy of men brutalized women is based on a fairytale. If yours was true, you'd still be brutalized because physically women's "liberation" was given to women by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:58 AM
-8

No man is afraid of a woman voting. If men wanted they could beat women into submission by pure force alone. However that's not in our nature so it never happens. Just because you see a few posters doesn't mean anything. We also see this id true with the law today. Every woman is exempt from selective service(the draft w extra steps) however a man has to be in it or he cannot vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:11 AM
-3

If you consider dominance subjugating others then yes. There's a clear trend between testosterone and dominance
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 01:47 AM
0

No masculinity would be masculine things/experiences that is universal to men. Women have never walked in men shoes to decide
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 11:41 PM
-10

They are which is why women were treated with different rules. This idea women were more suppressed than men is false. Men fought to protect women, even those that weren't there's. Place laws to protect women(women couldn't vote because they didn't want women to participate in war) and much more. Men throughout history have always held shittier lives on average
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 11:36 PM
-2

I mean testosterone, the thing that makes a man a man. If you increase it, he tends to prefer to be more dominant in hierarchies. Especially in family dynamics. So are we gonna believe nature or you
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 11:34 PM
1

Little to none. Take out male hormones his desire becomes so low like a woman's. Give him testosterone injections, it's all he thinks about
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 10:01 PM
16

People do cost benefit analysis. If the benefit outweighs their perceived cost, they'll do it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:02 PM
2

College aged. Your not gonna see the benefits of the gym fully till 2-3 years. Also girls will approach less but like you more if that makes sense. Go to a club and see the difference in how you're treated
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:49 PM
1

Yea but he said Chris Hemsworth is natural. Which is just a lie to sell $.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:47 PM
2

Normally people think steroids are Ronnie Coleman. But the rock, Chris Hemsworth, Michael B Jordan and the rest are just natural bodies with a good diet and trainer
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:44 AM
3

I don't know if you saw, but I'm agreeing with you... I think your looking to far into it, so much so you think I was arguing w you
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:43 AM
3

What you said is almost just as crazy as what I said. You just started and think results happen this fast. It doesn't do anything because you simply don't have much muscle to begin with
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:14 AM
4

This right here. Man went to the gym 3 months and think he's got as much muscle as Chris Hemsworth. Then think he can talk on this subject
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:38 AM
2

Sure women don't care, but every conventially attractive man always has lots of muscle. Surely isn't correlated. Must be the personality
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:37 AM
3

Studies show women may not trust you but there's almost nothing that's "too much". Unless your on 4+ grams of gear
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:36 AM
10

it's highly unlikely unless .0001%. People overestimate a lot of the times and think weight gain= muscle just cause they stepped foot in a gym
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:35 AM
3

toned muscles. So I put on 20 lbs in a few months You didn't put 20lbs of muscle on in a few months. Try going to the gym for 3-5 years then say it. As a steroid user and long term gym goer, the gym makes a lot of difference. Especially in the quality of women(lookswise)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:34 AM
1

If that's what you got from it, then great
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 10:10 PM
1

Broaden your vocabulary. Just because someone or something is at fault doesn't mean I hate them. However I will hold them accountable if it's the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 03:36 PM
0

You can turn it around however you like but what are we discussing right now. Go to a sports reddit if u want to talk about something else
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 10:47 PM
1

does, if this is even true for most schools which it isn't. This is only for select schools.Then it's just correction for the previous sexist practices for many years
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:34 PM
0

Comes to a dating discussion thread, suprised they're debating dating. Smart take!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:31 PM
0

2)Rare exceptions do not disprove the law. So most men still didn't choose. Parents did. You think White women were treated like blacks. No that I'd false history. Most men don't have power. Yet you choose to cherry pick egregious rare cases to support your theory
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 03:40 PM
0

People will do and say anything to believe their own bs and women are no different. But your correct
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 02:45 AM
-1

read the comments and find instead of 50 people asking for the same thing over and over
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 12:40 AM
-1

where did I say I struggle? Again reading comprehension is key!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 12:39 AM
2

deflect? She said affirmative action now helps men. Affirmative action isn't around.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 12:31 AM
1

Anybody can look up the recent gender divide with college. They can say anything, but despite that, the ratio is still largely women. So it's no point to respond something that I've responded to multiple times
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 12:28 AM
0

Look up the definition of whine. But I'm glad you can somehow talk for people who get laid. With a statement that isn't general and has no connections
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 12:27 AM
-2

Don't have to. Don't want to. Doesn't mean i don't know how it works. Again find it or prove me otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 12:25 AM
2

women were literal chattel for much of western history and most men were cannon fodder? Your point? This month is only the 50th anniversary of women being able to get bank accounts and credit cards in their own names, in the US. That means that your grandmothers, or your great-grandmothers at the most, could not be financially independent. So I guess women like Hetty Green didn't exist
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 12:11 AM
3

Affirmative action now favors men in most college Wow when did they bring back affirmative action?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 12:09 AM
0

if you can understand simple supply and demand. Then I'm glad you can't. Simple topics you can't contribute on anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 12:08 AM
-1

The only people whining is you guys. I'm saying factual information and you guys are whining for various reasons about it. Again addressing issues isn't whining
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 12:07 AM
-2

Great one college, one frat! Most be all there is too it. Although there isn't specific data on it. You can look up the schools with a heavy Greek life, their acceptance rates, graduation rates, and what those people graduate for. You'll see what I'm talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:30 PM
3

Liberated from what exactly. You can't be liberated if you were never in bondage. This false history is a big reason why women's happiness decreased
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:24 PM
-5

I'll say in slow terms for you. If I said dumb thing. You'd send proof and not ask for my sources. Because you know it's dumb. Yet you don't. I.E the sky is purple
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:16 PM
-5

Wrong use of dodging accountability. Besides, nobody can list evidence to the contrary saying I'm wrong. If what I was saying was so wrong like, the sky is blue, I'd have a host of people not asking for sources but proving me wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:15 PM
-3

Yet there was no increase in minority men. Only women. Population increased but minorities did not benefit. Please read the other comments before posting what's already been addressed
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:14 PM
0

I literally said in a comment above unless your in a special school like MIT. Then you go ahead and list that special school I said. Read kid read
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:13 PM
-4

I've had people who debated me saying that's not real water, to justify their beliefs. So no people do. Just like your trying to justify your belief to easy Google information. For example if I actually said something stupid you'd send so much proof and not ask for proof on mine. Yet you don't because you really don't have any
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:12 PM
2

Since men initially need women more than the opposite in todays time. Simple economics of supply and demand Do you have evidence that affirmative action is the reason that men are not going to college? Did not say affirmative action is the reason men are not going to college. I said affirmative action is a large reason for the increase in women at colleges
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:11 PM
0

For example, humans are by nature selfish. Most people who ask things like, how's X? Typically they are doing so to see where you place and they place on a social scale. Which you'll primarily see it with small talk within individuals with a past.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:09 PM
2

e men who did go to college by saying they are weirdos and “r word” who won’t graduate Did I say that, or is that what i said most women say. Please use reading comprehension. . I don’t want to finance a dude who plays video games all day and has zero ambition, or a single independent thought in his head.” Most marriages, men make more. This simple take is not how women operate. They want more which mostly equates to a higher status degree. Or are you just mad at educated people? And you want so…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:05 PM
-9

Alright type in Google, slide your mouse to the search bar, click and type
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:02 PM
-1

No but if I assert the water is h2o and you ask for source on simple easy Google info. Then it shows your disingenuous from the start.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:01 PM
1

Being bs and pleasant are not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 10:00 PM
-2

Sure, but I still think we should differentiate between these two. Who's at fault is often different to who's responsible (or who has to deal with this outcome). Can't make up our own definitions.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:59 PM
-6

Source? look up stats and what affirmative action is. It was for protected class citizens to join college. No real increase in any other protected class group besides women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:58 PM
0

Oh brother one trip to Google. The definition of fault is "responsibility for an accident or misfortune". I'm not getting anything wrong you just don't know the definition of a fault
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:41 PM
2

Unless your in MIT. No most frats have an excess of business majors and easy degrees. Some are in law and the etc but they aren't the norm. Out of my freshman class of 200 engineers. 30 were in a frat. Most changed majors and about 4 graduated. One of those 4 being me
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:38 PM
5

If you think the countless interactions of people who genuinely don't care for you and act as if they do bs. Then maybe you have life lessons that you need to learn. Most people go out of the way with a fake personality to appease others, following fake social laws to appease others as well. As a result most people are not happy with themselves and others
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:35 PM
3

Yes, but to what degree will always be different. For example, the poor person who was dealt a bad hand in life not being rich. Is it his fault, yes, but the degree is different. Now take a born rich man with a good hand in life. If he becomes poor is the degree of fault the same? See the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:34 PM
4

Never was socially awkward. Quite the opposite. If I don't say so, then don't assume so. Most social interactions are bs primarily driven by women and men trying to accommodate these women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:32 PM
-3

In most frats. Most never complete a STEM degree. Frats carry too much responsibility for anyone to ever complete most STEM degrees. Of course for business which is the most oversatured money grab degree
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:30 PM
-11

If you need a source to easily Googled information. The discussion your trying to have is disingenuous from the start
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:28 PM
-2

Affirmative action is pretty much gone and there were no set standards on who got in because of it and who didn't. So the only way to see what caused a change was to see the year it changed and what had happened during that time. AA lowered the accepted male rate and increased the female rate. Particularly white females. AA didn't benefit any minority and especially not white men because they aren't considered a protective class
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:27 PM
2

Did they think that there were infinite good jobs and resources? This is what western media and companies told them to drive inflation and lower wages for all.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:25 PM
0

Men are responsible for our own problems, and women are responsible for her problems. Yet typically men take on both. So I somewhat agree
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:24 PM
1

Even within a frat, those guys typically go for lesser degrees. Party and come up short after. So women won't go for them after college. Also frats have hierarchies, and if your not in a top frat it's better to be alone. However frats are the opposite of so called good guys by women, and most call them r words and weirdos yet most women still go
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:22 PM
1

Men still hold most the higher positions. However the common mam never held any power. So that never changed
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 08:04 PM
0

Patriarchy is dead, time for men to adapt I don't think you know the definitions of words you use.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 07:43 PM
1

From my perspective. To lose has no value. Normal is another word for failure. Mediocrity for a male is a death sentence. And I’m not even talking about the male to female dynamics rn. I’m talking all dynamics. Then you have no idea the criteria to win. Losing carries all the value because of the lessons within them. Mediocre people are Mediocre because frankly they're scared to lose over and over.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 09:18 PM
1

no and I didn't say he was
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 06:39 PM
1

Stop over exaggerating. If you go the club there's times when guys get out of line. Slap your girls ass etc. It's your job to defend her and she'll look at you to do so
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 05:49 PM
-1

Law enforcement is equal. If a man doesn’t feel safe he needs to call the police. It is not. Law and court will side with the woman. If a woman wants to she can literally say he hit me with no proof and he's gone to jail. If they’re not in danger then men need to just ignore those women and go do their own thing. I don’t understand why men try to deal with crazy women. They will not get anything positive out of that interaction so it’s a waste of time. Tell that to Jonathan Majors, Johnny Depp, …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 04:47 PM
2

I've seen many women do crazy things. Especially when they know they can. Women are not morally better. It's just in the face of men you know you can't overpower us so you don't. Anyway it's a highly naive take to say people will not be in some capacity violent. Regardless you can't use that excuse because the things men say. Indirectly affect us and the children
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 03:59 PM
-5

Is your girlfriend supposed to stay in the house under lock and key 24/7? That strikes you as “logical”? Please point to where I suggested this. Entirely emotional response. Relationships are a privilege. There are certain places a man shouldn't go(club, strip club etc) and places women shouldn't go. Again, if you’re that insecure that you need to be that controlling and dictatorial, you have deeper issues of your own to fix. If you think boundaries are this. Then the only person who needs fixin…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 03:58 PM
-3

If rational takes are insecure, then yes. What is a group of women going to do against alcohol filled men? Is alcohol around attractive individuals conducive to long-term healthy relationships? Feelings aside when you ask logical questions, not emotional ones. The decisions clearly show this is a very bad decision
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 03:53 PM
-5

Not really. For the club one. It's on the boyfriend to protect the woman. If she's out drawing attention to herself. A man is more likely having to defend her. Which puts him in danger as well
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 03:51 PM
-2

I think you're justifying behavior because it's happening to you. A club or bar for that matter, is a certain environment with a certain set of rules. By willingly going your adhering to those rules. Which nobody whose sane would do while in a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 03:48 PM
54

Women really only want what's best for them. Don't ever ask a woman for male dating advice and expectations
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/24 03:27 PM
6

Listening to this will have you a virgin lmao. Spark is the opposite of comfort. Dominance, which is proven to determine high male body counts is the antithesis to comfort. That anxious feeling she has when meeting you or doing something IS the spark.
/r/seduction20/03/24 01:19 AM
2

Citation needed Gender, Health Behavior, and Intimate Relationships: Lesbian, Gay, and Straight Contexts
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 10:27 PM
2

This is factually incorrect "Average age was 45 years for straight respondents, and 49 and 43 years for gay and lesbian respondents respectively. The average relationship duration for straight couples was 17 years, 21 years for gay couples, and 14 years for the lesbian couples" In most studies lesbians divorce more and leave quicker. While gay men have the longest. So yes I've "open my eyes" to statistical evidence and what I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 10:14 PM
-2

Yes, also by luck, most of my roommates have been gay. Typically the only time I see longevity is gay relationships( two men).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 10:05 PM
-7

Didn't say they don't exist. But if somethings the majority then I'd should see it more than not. Or at least once.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 09:19 PM
-2

I've never seen a long-term old lesbian couple. So I think that answers it
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 07:42 PM
5

On the face of it on paper, I would say yes. How are you gonna acknowledge your wrong. But when it actually comes down to sealing the deal, I have seen and experienced myself a very different result. Then use your own empirical data to try and hamster wheel the truth away?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 01:20 AM
2

Depends on what you mean by love. Originally love didn't mean a feeling or what people describe today. Which is just attachment and lust.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 05:52 PM
1

Not a belief. It is a statistical fact. For example, a lot of Men say they look at personality first, which is scientifically false. For most men that's a bullshit statement and should not be taken seriously. Should I take their word for it? Or provable science?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:17 AM
-1

Again you can say whatever. Doesn't mean it happens in practice. Statistically, all men DO the same but don't SAY the same thing. Humans are animals unless you wanna throw away science and any credibility you have
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 07:13 AM
8

When talking about social situations and dynamics. We talk about the general population. Not the special kids in the corner. It's disingenuous and doesn't help anybody 9/10
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:27 AM
-4

That's like asking why do I think all giraffes are similar, or all tigers. It's a really dumb statement to make to say otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:21 AM
7

You can’t make a general statement as if it’s fact if there are exceptions to the rule Read this sentence and see how crazy you sound. A general statement does not include exceptions because it's a........ "general" statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 06:20 AM
7

exactly everyone on reddit wants to be that special snowflake.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 05:48 AM
1

Two bullshitters bullshitting together. Men only friendzone if she's ugly, he hit, or he can't get her and is trying. Women friendzone for male boyfriend benefits without sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 05:10 AM
4

insane or stupid to achieve that. Now you get why most girls only complain about "bad guys" and typically smart guys never do well. Those are the guys they only see. You have to be somewhat insane or just point blank stupid to achieve it. Or a clear cut answer that smart guys can push themselves to. Also just to clarify by any I mean social/dating situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 12:29 AM
1

They say it helps but not needed. That is a mantra that people who weren't around or get TRP say. However TRP does not discredit and say those things will not work or help.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 10:51 PM
6

From Redpill sidebar "You don't matter that much. Sorry, but if the fate of the world rested on your shoulders we'd all be fucked. You're reading how-to guides about becoming ok with yourself. So really you don't matter that fucking much. And that's fine! That's preferable. It takes pressure off your shoulders. You can walk into a bar and tell a girl that you're a martian whose pants will explode at midnight unless an earth girl removes them with her teeth. Guess what? No one will care! Tomorrow…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 10:14 PM
4

Not what RP says at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 09:59 PM
1

A person who has been repeatedly rejected simply can’t display confidence at will because their brain won’t let them. Put your hand on a hot stove one time and try touching it with the same confidence a second time. The only way to increase confidence is to have repeated success, which unfortunately only gets more difficult with repeated failure. Problem is you believe confidence to only hinge on success. When confidence is an indifference to any outcome. Which redpill calls "outcome dependence"…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 09:55 PM
2

Sometimes I think most men are functional and women are crazy. But every now and then I see posts like this that make me wanna apologize.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 09:39 PM
1

To an extent yes your correct. Everyone loves opportunistically. The flaw is believing Men want to manipulate. However cars and social media have made it where it might be necessary for a good relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 09:16 PM
-1

Physically not mentally. Let's clarify first
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 06:22 PM
2

Women are not better than men socially. Women just have better first impressions since their a woman. They're allowed to interject in most social settings. Where a man is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 04:23 AM
3

Men dismiss it because when you try it, it doesn't work. If equal housework=sex and no headache. Trust me, there wouldn't be any problem. Women just need something to displace their own feelings on why they don't feel the relationship spark anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 06:31 PM
1

You would have grown those inches down the road. I didn't grow for years and at 19-22 grew 6 inches. HGH does not grow you past predetermined height provided you had no conditions beforehand. Yes I've been on steroids and this stuff for awhile. So I do know what I'm talking about https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/78129#1
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 08:37 AM
1

Generally speaking, yes, provided you mentally check that box for them. Nature made it to where women will attach themselves to a strong man.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 08:34 AM
1

HGH doesn't grow you taller than predetermined height. Steroids do work, and do get women but are harmful, if you don't know what your doing. A gram of anabolic is pretty safe provided you know what your doing but also can be pretty detrimental if you don't. Plus most people don't like needles.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 08:32 AM
4

First love, yes its true. Most people here are talking about first attachment, which is different from love.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 07:04 PM
2

Do they really believe their own narrative that they were so callow or drunk that they had no concept of what was going on? Yes because people in general believe that women are pure and devoid of the bad actions males do. To maintain that idea, each women has to make stories seperate from reality to affirm it. why lie to to yourself like that? Nature doesn't select for what's morally right but to achieve a desired objective. To further humans. Women's choices of who to have sex with is actually …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 06:43 AM
7

Sex just happens for the girl because how she views the story. She views it not from what she did but what you did. Which is why women always blame the man. However I've done it a decent bit now in college and each time I planned it. For the male it never "just happens".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 06:03 AM
–

You can't say "men of TRP" in your post and then tell about people who are not TRP. I get what you're saying it's just wrong. For example if I say in feminist but hate women and don't follow their ideals you can't say I'm a feminist
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 04:21 PM
–

There was a sidebar and website that defined TRP. You could maybe look before arguing something. You have no idea of the central idea and you're trying to argue it
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 04:04 PM
1

You can self identity with TRP but if you don't believe in what TRP says, then you are not Red Pill. You have to argue the doctrine not the individual people
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 03:44 PM
1

Redpill said it was a cumulative process and even said status was king not looks
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 02:55 PM
–

Justification is in the eye of the beholder. So cheating can be justified just not in your opinion. If we're arguing actual semantics.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 07:40 AM
25

If a man can consistently bed 9s. He's not a 7. Your trying to apply the same rules of women to men. Women are choosier with casual sex partners and rarely ever date down in marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 07:14 AM
2

Ask for a divorce and the man gets the short end of the stick? All of your advice sounds good, for women. For men it's terrible
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 07:12 AM
1

The red pill doesn't think this at all. Says this word for word. What it does say however that women choose bad partners because of the traits they look for
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 07:10 AM
0

Women don't need to be successful for a nice life. Men do. For women it's optional most of the time not mandatory. Also yes a man who is successful needed aggression to go out there and take what was his. Many men fight and never tell women about it. Yet women think it just comes to Men naturally. I'm not necessarily a woman so I cant speak for a unified woman experience. Therefore I cannot properly define feminity.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 06:00 PM
1

Masculinity is traits every man has to do to survive and do well, it's universal. Confidence, perseverance, aggression. Feminity is traits every woman has to do to survive and do well. Basically a universal male experience of a particular thing makes it masculine and same concept applies for feminity
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:42 PM
5

Surely you have the social nuance to see how chivalry defined as "courteous behavior" may be interpreted as simp or nice guy behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:00 AM
5

That same media also depicted these men doing chivalrous things. Things that put the woman first and is still somewhat supplicating to the woman. Which in today's time is a fast track to get you labeled as, a great boyfriend just not for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 11:44 PM
5

Stop being stupid and read the rest of the paragraph kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 11:36 PM
5

No the status quo is that men should be nice, treat women respect, other nice qualities before all that. That's what's told and most people learn through experience that is bs. Red pill is just a shortcut without having to go through the heartbreak
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 11:29 PM
4

Obviously rage baiting. It's so unknown about what men actually have to do, most don't know that it's gotten as bad as it is. For example every male considered conventially attractive today(celebrity wise) is on steroids. Many always say Women have it bad but at least we know and can't identify BBLs. Men can't even identify what's natural and what's the needle anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 11:10 PM
–

Happiness depends on a few things. Mostly for women, it's measured by her past relationships. Every man can't be it all, and one man will always do something better. Her current man will always be compared to the other men in the past. Women normally get the grass is greener mentality when the slightest inconvenience comes up and leaves. All because mentally she's playing the comparison game
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 05:12 PM
2

Yes, easy to test yourself. Go out ask people do you believe is there a "one and only" person for you
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 04:44 PM
–

Once someone has had an idea ingrained in them for years. It's hard to even see the wrong in your mindset, let alone change quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 12:25 AM
4

Because women give it up for someone whose extremely attractive yet hold out for anything lukewarm. There is a gray area you know. Most men are average and struggle, yet most women are average and don't struggle. You get my point
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:57 PM
8

No, it can't. Red pillers love to claim that they have stats to back up their ideology, but they don't. I've asked. 60% of women indicate that they are looking for a man over 6 feet tall in their search filters. However, that number drops steeply as the height of men lowers. 30% of women want to date men who are 5'11" and only 15% of women are willing to date men who are 5'8" or shorter. -Bumble survey. A majority (54%) of women with a degree say they would be less likely to date someone without…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:55 PM
3

If I was bisexual or gay then sure but you get the premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:47 PM
11

Blue Pill does heavily downplay looks and money, and if a man struggles blames his personality instead of the shallowness of women. Which can be statistically shown. The only way you can believe blue Pill ideology is if you don't look at stats in the West. Most people believe in the blue Pill and that's exactly why the divorce rate is so high. Women claim to know love yet lesbian divorce rate is like 73%.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:22 PM
5

You're not dating till it's agreed upon. You are just friends looking for more on the first date. If I ask a male friend to go somewhere, am I paying for his dinner when I ask him to hang out?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:16 PM
-1

You can literally wear a suit and tell women your a fortune 500 CEO and woman will believe you. Let's be real here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:02 PM
9

Women want equal partnership, yet come into a relationship dynamic and not making it equal. If women don't want an equal relationship dynamic, then sure do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 07:00 PM
7

Your making an assertion that the blue Pill, which is comprised of multiple ideas, is not lying, however only addressing a few of those ideas? Do you not see where the problem is?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:55 PM
15

The blue Pill was the Disney fantasy. The blue Pill is a term coined to described what the masses feel love to be. Which is what you see media and many people believe how love works. The red pill was the supposed more "truthful" side of the coin
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:48 PM
9

If they do say this I disagree with it. I am primarily defending the idea I discuss in the post. You can't make a blanket post title like "The Blue Pill didn't lie to you" and not defend all their ideas. Maybe the blue Pill was being semi truthful in some ideas, but in others, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:47 PM
6

Women have comparatively lower libido levels. Which allows them to be pickier. Men have comparatively higher, which makes them thirsty for it. Just simple economics from that point
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:38 PM
28

Blue Pill promised an idea that women were morally better people innately and that cheating and settling for less than was a primarily male driven thing. The Bluepill fantasy was that you were her one and only, and since she chose you, you were special, attractive and above her other suitors. Also promised that women love you for you. Which is just a lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 06:36 PM
6

No we claim women do too. Yet women say things like body count doesn't matter. Also say that short-term flings affect women more. Which they do statistically typically.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 04:24 PM
2

Red Pill- Women are attracted to strength(Alpha), and society discards weak men(Beta). Nobody really cares for you but for what you can provide. Everybody is like that(AWALT) but doesn't mean all will do it because of specific conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 12:49 AM
1

We're talking about women here. Not men. What applies for men does not apply for women
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 10:21 PM
4

doesn't refute my point and yours is still refuted. You still have to have it. Yet you can have it and not be with her is entirely possible
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 07:59 PM
4

Then why are most marriages based on the premise of better than. They have all the things I listed. Of course you could check those boxes and still not be together but those boxes still normally have to be checked today
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 07:23 PM
5

Statistically most marriages the man is taller, higher income, higher education. That's provable and common knowledge. So no it's what women say and mean
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 05:58 PM
2

Levels is an idea that you have certain preferences based on a perceived want from your own value. Stop trying to make every woman's needs to be virtuous and pure yet men are demonized
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 05:18 PM
1

Even women don't believe this bs. Most won't date a man who makes less money, is shorter, less intelligent and much more. Simply because women think it's beneath them
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 05:05 PM
2

Alright I see we're just gonna be dense. In every culture prostitutes wore more revealing clothing for the time. However I see you just want to be right.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 01:29 AM
2

That attire back in the day was mainly used for women looking to sell their body. Respectable women never want to be associated with prostitutes. So why would a normal sane woman want to wear the same clothes a prostitute wears? It's like a business woman wanting to look like a bum
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 12:32 AM
2

missed the point entirely. If I come out dressed like a fireman but I'm really a police officer. Should I get offended if people think I'm a fireman?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 12:06 AM
2

I'm on steroids big to the point where I'm seen regardless of what I put on. With that being said If I come out in a whore outfit. I still expect to he called a whore like most men. Yet most women come out like a whore an expect to be treated as a lady.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 11:46 PM
–

Plenty cases of rich white men being taken to the cleaners or arrested just off the words of a white woman. So although they are privilege, women sit far above.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 05:24 AM
–

Not getting fucked over isn't specific. People would ask how if you just say " not fucked over" because it's too broad.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 05:44 AM
–

"sexy women" and "classy women" get different perks. Every woman falls under classy until shown otherwise. It's not opposite just whatever you want to be treated as. Sex object? Never liked for you? But make lots of money and get cheated on by rich men. Be sexy. Classy? Maybe not have or make as much. But loved for her
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 05:43 AM
–

Yes paternity test wasn't a thing a long time ago. The only way you knew for sure if it was your kid is by the woman's actions or purity. It's ingrained not something consciously thought of
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 04:47 AM
–

Men watch as women get select benefits under the guise of innocence and being more "pure" than men. Once that is gone you lose the perks of a woman and get the same treatment other men get. Men always down other men for things that are easy and we don't do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 03:28 AM
–

No, because a woman gets her perks in society based on the idea of innocence and purity. Take that away and men feel as though she doesn't deserve it. Similar to how weak men are not thought of as men and discarded
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 03:26 AM
–

It's biological. As testosterone increases mate guarding and aversion to promiscuous confident women rises. Confident within the confines of I'm comfortable because I do this all the time. It is not a minority and all normal men share the same thought. However there are some who don't and the weird ones who say they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 03:24 AM
2

Men's problem are worse but to the point where it's integrated in society. For example most of the conventially attractive men take steroids. However beauty is not what propels a species. It's power, which, in my definition, is the ability to change your surroundings. Which is what women look for. They make themselves pretty to attract power. However, power is the hypergamous end goal and beauty is use to associate with it. A cute man has no use in the wild. A strong man does.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/24 10:20 PM
2

I’ve never heard a woman say they want a man smarter than them. I think you’re flattering yourself with something y let's not be dense. You've never heard " I want a man on my education levels or higher".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 07:58 PM
2

Yet statisticslly I'm right. You can feel or believe whatever you want. However the facts are facts
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 07:49 PM
2

Ok, I disagree because he specifically brought up dimorphic traits in the first place. It’s illogical to decide masculine biological traits are proof of superiority. some but that was only half. Reading comprehension is key. Smarter is not sexually dimorphic. Nor is more money.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 07:48 PM
2

no man says I want something better than me. However the short thing is true because of how women view them
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 07:07 PM
1

Even when your wrong, you argue just to argue. At this point everyone can see exactly what I'm saying. I need to say no more
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 05:03 PM
-2

And men want women who are better than them in other aspects: thinner, prettier, bigger breasts and wider hips, younger and healthier, gentler, more nurturing, more generous, more agreeable, better cook, better homemaker, better cleaner, more social… No men don't say " I have B cups let me get a woman with more than me". We just want boobs. Or another example is if we're thin we don't say, " I want a women thinner than me". Do you not see how Men have wants yet women want innate power dynamics?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:47 PM
0

The correct term is retrospective. Retrospective by Oxford languages , "looking back on or dealing with past events or situations." If women looked back at their past actions. What I'm saying would be apparent. However most women think they're never at fault. Nice try though
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:44 PM
–

Agreed. If you ask a woman for her preferences, typically it's more than. I.E taller, smarter, better salary. Aka a power dynamic. However women aren't very retrospective, so most here will disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 04:14 PM
1

TRP says the how all the time. However if you don't get it then I can see why. In layman's terms. Alpha is considered strength or power. Women love that and search for it. They are sexuality attracted to that. Irregardless of the other traits you have.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 02:30 PM
3

Again with blanket statements you can't back. It's obvious this is an act
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 04:49 PM
5

The fact you take your experiences and blankly associate it with all. Tells me all I need to know. In studies. Kindness predicts what women say they'd rather have and choose. However when asking men they're body count, those who are more aggressive, dominant, disagreeable report higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 04:27 PM
12

And most people in general especially woman have no idea what attracts them. What attracts them is a lot of the times different than what they think and say.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 06:15 AM
6

Women complaining about power dynamics, then looking for an innate power dynamic in their relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 09:56 PM
1

Dominance, Aggression and all those toxic traits predict sexual success not Attractiveness. These studies asked men's body count and those kind of men consistently scored higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 04:24 PM
2

In my opinion false. There's a good reason as people mature, the less people they keep around them. Especially they call "friends". Maybe acquaintances not friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:11 PM
0

The patriarchy is created by women. Simple logic that follows. Most women want more than. Men met that demand. Now women are surprised most men are better than?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 07:20 PM
3

She values 1 more. Will probably end up being with him if he changes a few things. Guy 2 is just more safe and tolerated.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 05:16 AM
1

I find that "good dick" isn't really a thing. It's more of a mental thing. I'd put it down one week and she wouldn't be feel it. But the next girl would love it. The girls who loved it tended to just like me more.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 10:50 PM
1

Yes despite what people say men and separately women are a monolith to a degree. Men are typically physically violent, women emotionally violent. Men's physical violence has been curbed over the last few years though. Which is why we dont see it as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 04:58 PM
1

Every woman does to an extent. Just like every man cares about sex to an extent
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 01:37 AM
1

There is an answer. Power is that general trend. Exude power in some way or another. Show it and you get women
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 12:17 AM
1

Not absolute rule as every rule has exceptions
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 06:40 PM
2

Of course there are always outlier women. You got lucky! I'm glad to hear your doing better though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 06:30 PM
1

It's word semantics. Attractiveness can mean sexually attractive, but it does not mean one in the same. If not you couldn't add sexually to the front of attractive. For example a long sword is a sword. Long is used as a descriptor because there's different types of swords. You have short swords too. Sword is just used to define a certain class or specification. If that makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 05:28 PM
1

Attractive means people like being around you. Or you attract others to you. Not necessarily meaning they want to have sex with you. Traits and looks that represent this are co-operative, agreeable, nice, disarming looks(estrogen promotes this). However sexual attractiveness with men have been shown to consistently be linked to dominance,aggression, and consequently power. Aggression is not fun to be around. Dominant behavior makes other submissive or feel weaker than. Which depending on context…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 05:20 PM
1

For women they cannot. For men they can. Dominance and aggression aren't really attractive or fun to be around. Yet through research is consistently found to have more sexual partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 05:03 PM
2

If women were obsessed with height, then short men would have been bred out centuries ago. But certain countries are tall and certain countries are short no short women keep the height average.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 02:36 PM
2

Not quite being tall is attractive because it makes us feel safer and that you’d be more likely to protect us if shit hit the fan. Repelling other men isn’t the concern you feel safe because he can protect you or aka repel men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 02:34 PM
1

Yes I've listed and these men are very macho. Almost all conventially attractive celebs are on steroids. Which is the definition of hyper masculine
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 02:33 PM
3

Mike Tyson was a small heavyweight….thanks for proving my point. He was at most 5’9-5’10 and 210-215ish Do you know how large that is? A 215 5'10 male lean is very very rare. Impossible without steroids and about 1% of the population if that. Every male is intimidated by size. Mike intimidated everyone around him not due to height but sheer size and attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 04:07 AM
1

He has very large legs. He doesnt have calves but any man at that height will not have. It's largely genetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 04:05 AM
5

Not really. These men are putting their trust in you. And respect your opinion. So they go against their instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 04:04 AM
2

The rock has always been huge though. Even younger. Younger him was still on steroids. Just less so
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 04:03 AM
4

Sexual Attractiveness arguably comes first, though, for most women early on
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 04:00 AM
2

Hard for some people to believe but this is the relationship dynamic she likes. Even though she complains about it, she ultimately likes it
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 01:17 AM
11

Exactly and this carries over to other things in life like you stated.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 12:58 AM
3

Delusional or not it doesn't matter. Money is not universal. As some women could care less for money. No woman wants an unconfident man.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 12:56 AM
0

definitely not. Guy is 6'3/6'4. To be that big he is every bit of 225lbs. Normally now that's at his lean weight
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 12:55 AM
2

Even in the criminal world. People target those smaller than them. In sports bigger people are seen as more threatening and even though they're scared fighters push through that. Look at Mike Tyson, Overeem, TRT Belfort and many more.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 12:53 AM
2

If you categorize a guy as nice only. It's not a good look.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 12:51 AM
-1

I'm saying seeing someone with muscles puts everyone in a state of fear so exactly that. It's hard to really retrospectively look at until your in certain situations near those people. Same with height to a certain extent.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 12:35 AM
6

Yet they are disagreeable and everything you said opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:49 PM
4

He wrote a song and people listened because people listen to what they like. He didn't change people's opinions with a song.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:48 PM
-1

I agree but intimidation comes from fear of what that person can do. Which I think is important to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:35 PM
0

Bigger butts were always attractive too. Which shape matters more though. Although back in the day some racism was at play. So we can't really look at that
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:34 PM
5

Is that why disagreeable men have more partners, why they're given higher positions and etc?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:33 PM
6

He has been on steroids for a majority of his life is my point. So he always been above naturally big
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:32 PM
5

I've seen the opposite. The taller and bigger the man. The more wary they are of them
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:32 PM
5

Exactly the conclusion I've came to.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:18 PM
3

Your not getting what im saying. A quick example is this. Depending on one's diet determines what they're body does. Insulin while high tells you to store body fat in the stomach and sides of stomach, neck, etc. Areas that are unattractive. While also significantly lowering hormone levels. Healthy women eating a correct diet as they gain weight store weight in boobs, hips, and the ass. Which men can see. Although everyone's bone structure is different. How fat deposits around the body is very ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:16 PM
4

Most women think Men are scary just because their smaller than men. Which validates what I'm saying further. Men also feel intimidated by bigger men. Intimidated due to fear of what that man can do. Everyone feels that way. The only people who don't are those already bigger than the normal population
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:10 PM
5

The guy on the reacher has been on steroids the first season. He just took less than now. However, he is very big now, and he still will do way better than average,below average, or even above average males.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:08 PM
4

Actually, yes, but they follow a trend that a man can detect. 1/3rd of the population is also pre-diabetic, so not healthy. So a woman stops storing fat in certain areas, and it goes to other areas to signify being unhealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:07 PM
4

Yes, it does make sense. Reflection of hormones and consequently health.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:01 PM
3

Women because that's why we ask them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 11:00 PM
2

Not when you have to twist a statement to create a narrative to support something. Your here just to win a argument that you know is incorrect. Which is why you tried to use a play on words and logical fallacies to form some kind of statement
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:59 PM
1

Your making absurd statements but, women do give serial killers, drug dealers, convicts, and other fuck ups more attention than regular everyday law abiding men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:56 PM
16

Confidence is a universal form of power. Power is ultimately what women care for
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:55 PM
0

Sometimes out of laziness, but the majority of dating advice does not tell them this.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:54 PM
1

It's not but if you go to one side of the coin. You should expect certain types of results.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:53 PM
2

Either you misunderstood completely or willingly not getting the point so I'll give an example. Woman meets 2 men at a bar. Man 1 and 2 are both very confident. However shee attracted to 1 and not to 2. So she views 1 as confident and 2 as arrogant. Because in her eyes, this ugly man must be compensating.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:50 PM
8

Yes bigger humans are scary. Muscles make you more scary as well. Aggression is scary as well. They are both not necessarily traits that attract others. Although sexually attractive if that makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:48 PM
1

sorry I typed it wrong. Meant to say won't not want. Early on in their life if they're not sexually attractive women skip over them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:44 PM
2

You should tell men that first though don't you think? Then men wouldn't have to ask again
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:43 PM
4

Depends what you mean by big and shredded. Chris Hemsworth is like 6'3 230lbs shredded women love it. Even the rock whose 6'2 250lbs shredded. Both on steroids and women love them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:43 PM
1

Tell me the difference between confidence and arrogance. Now Tell me the difference between aggression and leading. It's hard to draw a line and both are basically one another. Just depends on the viewpoint
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:41 PM
5

I agree. I'm on steroids and been so for awhile. Was told women don't like that. I've seen completely otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:33 PM
5

I agree with basically all your premise
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:32 PM
6

because it's disingenuous. They want get a relationship or sex without being sexually attractive too early on
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:29 PM
5

The only thing tall represents is being bigger. Which means being able to defend. Muscle as well. I think your misunderstanding on purpose
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:28 PM
8

Why are we making crazy statements like these. We know generally what I mean
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 10:27 PM
2

Women shame other women who sleep around almost the same as men in the West. However, humans in general do things that benefit them. Women want a free pass for their own mess ups. So every woman plays along with a woman shouldn't be judged by her body count.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 03:54 PM
4

I don't know if that's entirely true. I've had ONS sober with 7+/10. At the same time, being rejected by girls much uglier.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/24 04:04 AM
1

The same and cold approach isn't weird. Do you thinking see a random person, complimenting their car or clothes as weird? If not then that's cold approach. What about asking for directions? That's cold approach as well
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 08:59 PM
1

Its Women's choice. Just by the data, In every country where women have it great. Birth rates drastically drop.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 08:57 PM
2

You don't have to have sex with them. You just need to see the experience and how each individual acts. Although you are gonna have a lot tougher time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 04:39 PM
–

Psychopaths love power. What woman love most too. So of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 09:07 AM
10

For me, I followed three rules. Rule one, Girls like power/strength. Whether the guy is good or bad. Think of what practically makes you look weak. Do the opposite. Rule two. Every girl isn't open, even if you're exceptionally hot. Go through a lot, find one who's available. If she's open it doesn't matter what you say. Just talk about her. Rule three. Always be leading to what you wanna do. If your not leading a situation she either doesn't like you or she's using you/set up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 12:54 AM
0

I do, but that's an important distinction to know. Because then you'd know the others aren't so bad. Sugar is proven to be one of the leading causes of death. Not Coke, weed or the other stuff. Even though they do and can be quicker
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 06:50 PM
20

None at all. I'm autistic a little and I struggled early. Mainly because the early advice given was garbage. Autistic people need factual logical advice and a premise to follow. Mainstream advice gives bs feels advice that's not good for them
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 06:22 PM
2

But they're just poor. No extra things like that was said. Poor countries have more children too. Regardless of how attractive the men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 06:20 PM
1

https://www.jstor.org/stable/40375955 And the other ones are studies about criminals who are low income.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 06:07 PM
1

Poor men report having more partners, more wives, more children. So I don't know if that's necessarily true
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 06:00 PM
34

Problem is people don't view intelligence correctly. Just because someone does dumb things online, doesn't mean they're stupid. Smart people understand that really stupid actions get views. So they replicate that
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 05:55 PM
1

Very comfortable as everybody does drugs. You take caffeine? That's a drug. What about sugar? That's also a drug.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 05:47 PM
10

It exists but women and simpy men aren't gonna admit. It's always your fault as they think everything in the relationship is on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 05:46 PM
1

a random philosophical idea has no basis. The reason why I say you look it up is because it generally gives me an idea where your head is. If you can't go on Google, type three words. Then you're just looking to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 04:45 AM
1

If you're not going to put in the work then don't make the claims. What are you talking about. I make the claim you disprove that claim. Dominance is not the opposite of kindness. You can be dominant and kind. That's not how most studies see it or people generally. People consistently rate more dominant face as less trustworthy, colder, and less kindm
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 12:37 AM
1

Look up dominance and sexual partners. No person in history with power has ever been nice. convicts get more kidd etc. Am I gonna go searching for all those studied no but it's easy for you to search the first sentence
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 05:08 PM
2

Not small most studies confirm it. But 100s of women is enough experience to generalize. Power is the only thing that provides safety
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 11:47 PM
3

Kindness is not even what makes a man attractive to most women
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 10:36 PM
1

I'm referring to women not accepting themselves being their own worse enemy in dating. If they accepted themselves they'd find most of their issues leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 10:34 PM
4

Doesn't encourage self hatred but when you've been lied to by that same gender. You'll initially be upset correct? There's nothing wrong with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 10:32 PM
6

disingenuous because most people mean, "your terrible to be around" which actually has no bearing on if you can get a girl or not. Plenty of terrible men who can have women
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 07:53 PM
1

It's bad if taken at face value. But the reason why most women pick terribly and are so vain is because they won't accept themselves. Picking out small flaws like "my eyelashes are too small" and then judge others also for small flaws. So accepting yourself does have validity for women. Not for men because that's fundamentally not our problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 07:14 PM
3

especially since you realize a lot of the numbers you get are from women who want you to go away and leave them alone. on any given day that same woman who got bothered would have loved for me to come up to her another day. However maybe she had a bad day or etc. it's about timing and having the emotional capacity to recognize it. Majority of sane women love to be approached. If your happiness hinges on making people uncomfortable, it's time for an evaluation. No you fundamentally don't live in …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 07:11 PM
2

you’re fine with putting women in uncomfortable situations, tells me everything I need to know Being emotionally intelligent means knowing you can't appease everybody. For every person I make comfortable there's somewhat else I make uncomfortable. But you haven't gotten that far in your journey and that's fine. I'm not going to compromise my happiness because a few women don't like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 06:13 PM
5

I don't think they're giving bad advice, I think they're taking on the problems that are concretely solvable and men aren't really asking them to solve the concrete issues (I know, what an ironic twist). This is from my experience actually trying to work with the sort of "failing" men who can't seem to get it right They're giving bad advice because all women have to do is the bare minimum and get dates. They think they can apply it to men and get the same results. Don't fix anything but make it …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 04:53 PM
3

They mean well most the time. Yet they don't have any experience with being the aggressor. It's like asking a mouse how to be a lion
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 04:49 PM
4

A lot of girls will give numbers just for you to go away. So there's that. No man that approaches in public are low EQ as the emotional fortitude is something most can't ever hope to achieve. As you do it, you also have the emotional intelligence to understand most women aren't available at a particular time. You just need to scan through and find the available women. It's really telling that you denote a whole group but have never seen every person in said group
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 04:48 PM
3

Online dating and meeting people in real life is very different. Also to find someone you have to search. Your advice is just feel good platitudes that isn't helpful at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 09:00 AM
8

A half truth is just as much a lie as a full blown lie. They'll both lead you on the wrong track you need a complete view. To go on the right track. It makes perfect sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 08:27 AM
4

No I'm just saying from what you said. This is generally through experience today.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 08:25 AM
7

Generally about 3/10 give a phone number. Out of 6 who give number, generally get a date or sex with two. And where I'm at I'm heavily disadvantaged. The reason why women complain about shitty men. Is because the shitty men are the only ones approaching. I thought it was waste of time, till I tried it. One thing I've learned that after doing this. Pretty much every woman thought I got around or had a lot of women, when generally at the start I had none. No woman gave me straight up compliments b…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 08:23 AM
7

Red pill advice I've seen seems pretty illogical as a solution for all men. I've seen some advice that suggests all men should be millionaires or all men should be upper class. Sorry, kids - you've all apparently skipped your basic education in economics and politics. Shit doesn't work like that and you're fighting an uphill battle to make the impossible a reality Just because you misunderstood red pill doesn't mean it's illogical. Red pill in essence tells men that women want men. And what they…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 07:40 AM
3

Experience and it's the culture right now. For this argument a culture is created because most people are operating within that framework. So ironically Twitter, YouTube, Instagram to an extent are showing a truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 07:37 AM
1

Anyone who wants to increase productivity for a man whose under paying you good luck. Feelings have little to do with whether you act or not. Unless your not a well adjusted adult
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 07:36 AM
9

Most women do not think like you. This is not from a tweet but experience talking to over 100s of women. Not date necessarily
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 07:06 AM
1

Not an adult. You think adults wanna go to work everyday? You know how many times you don't feel like it but do it anyway because it allows you to live in a way you want?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 07:04 AM
0

okay? feel however you want. If you want a outcome in life you do whats necessary despite how you feel. I want a nice body but I feel like not going to the gym or exercising. You think I can get that by not going because I "feel" some way?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 06:41 AM
9

Let me correct. Women have lots of good options that they pass over or they don't choose correctly. By just logic. The more chances you have, the more likely to hit something good. Who has a better chance of finding a good person. The one with one person interested or 20?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 06:27 AM
7

a maxim means a general truth. your not helping your case
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 06:25 AM
8

I don't think you have a point. You can make anyone, someone. The more people you have the better you can make an informed decision and even have the opportunity to get someone that fits.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 06:03 AM
5

Generally agree. Women are more violent emotionally/mentally. Men are more violent physically. Men normally fight when upset. Women wreck mentals.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 06:00 AM
8

Then you lose. There's generally one way to success and you can't do whatever you feel like if you want a certain situation. For example a rule to success is to be okay with risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:55 AM
1

talking to all 4 billion women on the planet increase your chance of “getting” a woman? Probably. end it here. Men are looking for options. Again every man should read this and understand why I said don't listen to people like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:36 AM
4

Rejection is what seperate those who have success and those who don't. Those who are scared never take any action. Rejection is never time wasted as the memories, skills, and generally now new chances of success rise with every Rejection. For example those who aren't afraid of loss take risks. The more risks you take, the more likely you hit it big.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:35 AM
16

they're letting you know. advice is something to better your situation. Or like knowledge that's passed on. Yours is more like she just passed you off to someone
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:33 AM
–

Much different experience and in many ways easier. Privilege is invisible to those who have it a lot of the times.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:30 AM
7

Not even relationship. Because how you got her, is generally how you have to keep treating her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:27 AM
2

Not necessarily because despite what people think. It was they're environment and what they were given. So they genuinely have a better understanding than most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:26 AM
24

That's not advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:24 AM
4

The fact that you don't understand how your not answering is bad. Answer yes or no. The more women I talk to, the more women I potentially get? It's a yes or no question that you know the answer to.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:23 AM
3

Not even answering my question. This is a clear example of why I said don't ask women. Just defaulted to asking if it's better for men to do whatever. To well women want X y and z
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:17 AM
5

agreed. The default advice for that man by women will be his personality must be bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:15 AM
5

Cold approach is not just walking in a mall. Cold approach in general means walking up to someone without ever meeting them. Its a normal term. For example seeing a man with a nice car. Coming up to him, complimenting it, and asking what he did for it. That is also Cold approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:13 AM
6

Is that statement wrong? It's common sense talk to more women, potentially get more. Yet most women will tell you not to approach a lot of women
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:08 AM
7

What are you trying to say. I'm equalizing by saying women already lie a lot. Statistics show. So let's even the playing field and allow men. Men are the only who are expected to "be the bigger man" and etc. Not lie and so forth
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:06 AM
6

Exactly somewhat. They're coming from a point of view of already thinking they're attracted to the guy and generally are wrong or don't know exactly what made that particular guy attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:04 AM
5

You didn't get the whole point. It's the POV of what's beneficial for them. Which is most of the time the opposite of what gets a man success
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:03 AM
0

Yes because those men typically have gotten advice from women or have a feminine centric viewpoint
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:02 AM
4

I don’t like it but I can handle it fine. I think it’s a bad idea because cold approachers look like desperate fools and women make fun of them when they leave. Most cold approachers are pretending to be outgoing and gregarious when they are not and it’s a real fish-out-of-water moment. really isn't cold approach was normal before technology. There was not word for it. Just called being social or a player. The more like-minded who share some common interests and values he talks to, the more wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:01 AM
5

generally yea I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 04:58 AM
1

It's uniquely bad because its a pov from inside. Which is highly subjective. For example skinny women thinking they're fat
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 04:58 AM
13

They're perspective is incomplete because experience yourself vs someone else experiencing you is different. If that makes sense
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 04:56 AM
7

Then everything is a game in life with that mindset. Cause everything has rules you need to follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 04:55 AM
1

That isn't the main focus of argument. It's what they were taught and how it actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 04:23 AM
9

Yes it hurts someone but someone also gains. Women hurt men all the time, example being with divorces. Yet marriage culture is continually pushed. Why is it only a problem when women are hurting?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 04:22 AM
0

I don't know but I find women lie a lot. Especially when they leave their man. In my past women would clearly have an orgasm but once were no longer together she acts as if she didn't. Is it that actually true and they tested it? Or is it what women say. They never test it just go off what women say.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 09:43 AM
1

You gotta be bored, but I'm bored too but anyway. Women don't want it from random men. They want it from a man they know and deem "strong." Most the time, if your not strong to them. You're just gonna be kept around as a friend for her to use. Doesn't really lower value because the men she doesn't deem as men don't even really register.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 05:29 PM
-1

No Redpill is fundamentally understanding women want a man whose powerful/ in control. First and foremost. So, inadvertently, these men do things to imitate or have that. Big difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 06:10 PM
1

There is no right words to make a girl do that. Either they do want to or don't after you get them comfortable
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/23 03:54 PM
1

Still not a moral standpoint. It just feels that way to a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 05:48 AM
1

No it is not. No, no sane man wants sex from a woman who doesn't really want sex as it feels like the r word.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 05:27 AM
1

Men want sex with a woman that wants to have sex with them. Contrary to belief it is just sex, but sex with a woman who wants you is what men really want. As how a man measures how good the sex is, is how much she wants him and shows.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 02:31 AM
1

Lying can also help you. If your a good liar it's gonna help more than harm. This idea that a lie won't help is just false
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 11:05 PM
1

Critical thinking skills can't tell you whether someone is lying or not. I can say I love you for 3 months and not. Anyway do you know what critical thinking skills are?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:58 PM
1

There is a right way to approach that situation. Lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:57 PM
1

Karma isn't a thing in that way. In that case America wouldn't be profitable, and those who were slaves in America would be doing well. Is that happening? Okay don't bring up make believe karma
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:56 PM
0

Can't argue with someone who doesn't even make sense to themselves. Anyway this isn't a moral argument, but what is better for that individual man.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:56 PM
1

Your both using each other's body. She's using your $ for her meal. Stop acting like sex is a one way street.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 07:49 PM
1

Again a normal woman does not want to be hit and quit. Finding women like those are finding crazies and a rare rare woman. Again this isn't a moral argument as i don't care for people's subjective morals. It's an argument of which is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 07:48 PM
1

Same as what some women have been doing. Yet it's perfectly fine. If I say something like lying about body count is okay because of how people judge you. Most of you would be for it! Just because it benefits you
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 07:37 PM
1

So women have this innate lie detector test? Sign me up!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 07:35 PM
1

Somebody didn't get the joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 07:34 PM
2

Exactly basic social skills when you think about it. But these people are trying to argue against basic social skills so women can have better options again.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 06:33 PM
1

Sex and the woman wanting to sleep with you. Many women will want to sleep with you but since you said all I want is sex. You get none. Although that's truth at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 06:05 PM
1

Being initially interested for free food and in general things. Body count, their initial reason for liking(sometimes they just want your money), and much more. Yet it's fine when a woman uses you. However if a man uses a woman and lies its just so bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 06:04 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 05:49 PM
1

Then we all must be that, and your just the only normal person. Good for you! Must be hard being a special snowflake
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 05:48 PM
1

Not the same. Plus why are you so upset when women lie to men all the time. So no men should lie to women as well. Equality
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 05:47 PM
0

Normal people don't lie about this shit, only edgy kids and actual incels think this way*. so I'm guessing all college kids are this way. Going to 3 major schools this is about true.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 04:51 PM
1

Low conscience is not seeing that in every situation, someone is losing and someone is gaining. On a rudimentary level.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 04:50 PM
1

It's a fact. There isn't anywhere historically where the good honest man wins.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 04:49 PM
1

They choose a lie anyway rather than the truth. When given the opportunity they choose bad anyway. So why not let the man who doesn't get it, get some
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 04:48 PM
1

Family is, but that doesn't count. I'm too young. I do make more than people my age though
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 04:47 PM
0

Direct communication makes life, relationships, and interactions with people so much easier. Harder. Nobody wants to be friends much less date the guy who's brutally honest. Some do but it's rare and not worth the effort. Women lie all the time and they typically do better socially. Only when it comes to men do we expect them to be this honest virtuous beings.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:48 PM
1

you asked about a conscience. I replied that everyone does. Please read and stop getting angry cause you aren't thinking straight
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:46 PM
2

low value? Honesty and niceness get you to be poor. Lying gets you money. Which is low value? Stop listening to morals and look out at the world for what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:45 PM
1

Everyone does. However, if one gets you alone more than not just so you can feel like your good. Then your on another level of stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:27 PM
1

Your lying if you see a girl and say "oh wow I bet her personality is nice let me go talk to her". I won't even reply back if we're gonna lie that big
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:23 PM
1

if it does work, which it does sometimes all the time* fixed it. , you’re still a liar and a piece of shit a liar and a piece of shit that gets women. This is about the man and his happiness. Not everybody else
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:22 PM
–

actually he can argue that to a degree. As dating app trends and asking women themselves tell on themselves. Most find most men below average. Which just doesn't make any sense. Women generally are way more picky and superficial over more things than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 04:41 AM
3

You're just throwing a word around and don't know what it means. Learn what the word means then come back to real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 04:27 AM
–

You don't even know what game is. Game is essentially lying too. Let me guess your a woman whose never had to or a man whose lost? Which one
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 04:20 AM
6

Repercussions aren't as bad as you think. Honesty carries more risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:33 AM
2

Nobody wants that. Paying for it defeats the purpose for most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:33 AM
3

No problem because nobody is this pure innocent being. Explaining a unicorn essentially to prove your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:26 AM
0

Being polite and "doing the right thing" will have you homeless.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:25 AM
2

Exactly. Even if a woman wants to have sex with you. Saying all I want is sex doesn't give her that mental opportunity. When their sex drive is heavily mentally tied not giving her that chance is bad
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:24 AM
1

I've done that over 3 years in college. 100s of times. From experience your wrong and LARPing online
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 02:23 AM
3

Yes they already do
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 01:24 AM
2

read again I said yes multiple times because they already do and it's already accepted today
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 01:24 AM
-2

Getting to know someone is essentially lying. Whether autistic or not but I know most women think the same. Hence the "why did he act like he liked me and ghost."
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 01:23 AM
4

Most divorces are set on money. Marriage is about love not monetary investments at least thats whats told to men. Marriage is the premise of love but most women divorce when money is gone. Which shows it wasn't love but the money or what she could get from him.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 01:02 AM
0

No because It happens all the time. Immaturity is believing that doing good nets you good. When history and experience teaches you otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 01:00 AM
-4

No. Get therapy
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:45 AM
6

If that's what you think so be it. Most women have to lie to keep a man. Now would you say that to a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:45 AM
2

If you see the result of your honesty as a punishment you weren’t being honest because you’re an honest person, you were being honest because you no a punishment is a punishment. there's no need to hamster wheel it around. If I continue to get slapped for my honesty that is a punishment. Anyone is going to change if they're getting punished for being them. If not that person is by definition insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:34 AM
–

Thing is, women do this and stats to prove. Divorce rate, women initiating breakups the most, women only choosing to date men who make more despite saying they don't care. Women saying they don't care for height, yet continue to be the biggest heightists. Women saying they're for body positivity yet harshly judge themselves and other woman way more than men(when's the last time you heard a man say her eyelashes are short) and much much more. Just please don’t ever have children. No child deserve…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:31 AM
2

Might be a joke to you. But it'll turn out way better than you think
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:28 AM
-1

Being truthful hurts you in the long run. No woman likes the truth. However a lie feels much better where most women like to live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:23 AM
2

Whyy are you just blanketly assuming all women make lower income?? Statistically they do
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:22 AM
3

It was an example stop being willfully dense.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:18 AM
7

No problem at all because women already do. Way more than men. Drinks at clubs, marrying for money etc and claiming love. Much more except we just allow them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:18 AM
6

Men can't get divorced if unhappy. No matter how hard you fight the kids will get ruled to the mom. The family income was his income. Since her income was lower. She doesn't need it. I see your the type to live in delusion to accept your own values.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:17 AM
2

No the barrier is higher due to seeing more of what's out there. Once you see 6'6. 6' isn't tall anymore. Whether you lie or not doesn't raise the bar for anybody.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:09 AM
6

Then you fundamentally never been one or seen one besides online. You have to act interested in a woman. Unless alcohol is involved. Then that goes out the window.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:06 AM
5

Lol, people love politicians and celebrities because they make them feel good, not because they’re truthful Now you finally get it. This is why lies are better. Most people are mediocre, you want to hear that? No most women want to be special. Your fundamentally misunderstanding why they are liked. It is because they are a liar
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:03 AM
1

Never said that. I said initially men want sex. Any man is lying if he saw a woman across the room and said "wow I bet her personality is amazing". In a serious way. Men see the body or face and get interested in the sex part and the rest come. But conveying that first part to women will leave them upset and a one way ticket to rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:01 AM
0

I've never been friendzoned. As a 220lb man on certain substances. People, especially women, assume me to be a certain way. So either I'm having sex with them or were not friends at all. However dealing with them it's quite obvious honesty does nothing but get you punished.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:59 PM
3

Women invest far less. For example, who gets custody? Who takes most the family income? Who typically gets placed on child support. Who typically has to pay more in relationships? A measure of relationship success is how happy a woman is comparative to her man. If her man is happier, higher chance of divorce. If not the reverse. The only thing women invest more in is child rearing and child birth. In every other facet in life, men invest much much more.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:58 PM
1

Nobody is rationalizing. My point is lying is better for a man and it is point blank. There is no need to rationalize a truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:54 PM
0

Then why do people continue to love the people who lie the most. For example, politicians, most celebrities, people who tell them they're the greatest thing ever and etc? Lying gives way more than honesty ever will. if we're honest with ourselves. Most are average and not worth much because of actions. Would you rather someone tell you that or lie about how your an amazing snowflake? Most women would rather be that amazing snowflake.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:53 PM
-1

Not personally but I'd be a fool to not learn from others around me. This isn't a one off thing but happens a lot. Way more than it's told.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:52 PM
5

I'm speaking for the men who continue to face that. Years in a marriage where a woman essentially was planning her exit. Divorce is high with most men losing all they have. Including halting their mental advancement for the kids and family. Yet nobody, especially people like you, care about that. Lying to someone, creating a home, giving fake love just to take that away from them is far far more emotionally damaging then a guy lying for sex and you two consentually have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:51 PM
5

I've literally been D1 on steroids with abs lean. A woman unless something is wrong with her. Will not just sleep with you if you tell her I just want sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:48 PM
2

You can do both. Premise still applies but I'm also not doing this in a club where it will work because alcohol is involved. A normal would who is sober will not take a random offer for sex. Unless she knows you or something is wrong mentally
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:47 PM
0

Of course you swap between both honesty and dishonesty. However we do tend to lean in either direction more. People who are more dishonest. Which is what I'm talking about will do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:42 PM
0

Call me old fashioned but I believe lying has a corrosive effect on your self image. If that was the case, politics wouldn't be a contest of whose the better liar. Politicians lie to sound good but not one has done the real things they promise. Those people are loved way more than you and me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:41 PM
3

This idea that you can self improve to a point where women will throw away their instincts is just false. No woman wants to sleep with a man she thinks is gonna leave her. Or at least she can't control.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:39 PM
4

So you don't think years of emotional investment. Years of your life wasted. Years of your money, mental advancement gone. Isn't worse or at least on par with someone lying about a relationship and both consenting to sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:37 PM
1

I agree with this statement 100%. The problem is. Most women fundamentally don't want the truth. So you have to lead with a lie most the time. Most men just initially want sex. Express that and most men would not be with those women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:33 PM
1

I've tried and this is a lie unless alcohol is involved. No normal woman is gonna give it up to a guy who tells her he only wants her for sex. Even if you are attractive. Now maybe rich famous and attractive is different but that's. .0001 % of the population
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:32 PM
1

You don't. Most women know pretty quickly if they'll have sex with you. If the opportunity arises. However you can turn a woman off. Honesty is unfortunately one of them
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:29 PM
-1

If a man is being honest. All he wants initially from a woman is sex. if he's honest he'll convey that. That's a one way pass to not getting sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:28 PM
3

That would be the case. But we have studies irrespective of what he looks like where women give their thoughts on the connotation nice. So it's not necessarily disinterest in the person themselves but word along with the person which is a huge difference
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:27 PM
4

Women lie all the time for what they want. They act like they love you for $. Or attention and much more. Attention is the same as access to your body. Both are being used.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:26 PM
5

You can improve all you want but if you start off honest like. All I want is sex. Most women will turn you down
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:25 PM
0

Extinct. As the protection women get afforded today, and in the past, is largely because of male sex drive
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 02:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter