TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_malat Archive

View 5 posts and 195 comments by _malat on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Barely literate.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 03:56 PM
118

More feminist "collateral damage." I hope this piece of shit "teacher" is proud of himself. How many people in the West have never had sex while under the influence? According to feminism, almost the entire population is made up of rapists.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 03:17 PM
1

The right was right about feminism. That's about it. This was basically dumb luck.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 03:10 PM
4

Um, you're aware that the Nazis went after socialists and trade unionists FIRST, right? "Fascism is the merger of state and corporate power." - Mussolini The ignorance of basic history by right-wingers is pretty frightening.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 03:04 PM
3

"Study" quotes rape apologist Koss and the "1 in 5" false stat. Just more anti-male propaganda.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 02:27 PM
4

As opposed to "the right".
/r/MensRights08/01/15 07:37 PM
1

Why? Is America worse? Certainly it isn't better.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 07:36 PM
1

Are you you aware of reports on casualties regarding destruction of the electrical system of Iraq? US Generals certainly were. Educate yourself.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 05:33 PM
1

She was only trying to have a man kidnapped, locked up, possibly raped, undoubtedly beaten, for decades. What's the big deal? Besides these incidents are *cough rare.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 02:49 PM
4

A classic example of projection.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 02:47 PM
2

I wouldn't worry about it. Men will make sure you're maximally comfortable, as they always do. Now that women are whining about this "problem" it will be quickly solved. Even as men continue to die in the gutter.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 02:44 PM
2

Silly man. That would prevent the entire point of the exercise -- namely whining. All the time. If everything were to be exactly changed according to feminist wishes they would still whine. All the time. And demand things went back to the way they were previously. There is no winning with feminists. The only logical solution is to ignore them.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 02:40 PM
0

Studies show that the vast majority of "Islamic terrorists" -- in excess of 95% -- are motivated by occupation, not religion. So yeah, you and OP have much to learn. The US has bombed about 13 different countries dominated by Muslims since 1990. If China was bombing and occupying the US, and some of you fought back, ya'll would be "terrorists." Think about that.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 01:49 PM
-1

Don't be such a whiny little pussy.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 05:24 PM
-11

Just 'cause you're a manjina with tiny balls doesn't mean the rest of us don't need room. Sorry clown.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 05:16 PM
2

Cheers David. You're awesome.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 11:19 AM
4

Vice is about as anarchist as Mussolini.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 09:23 AM
8

There are many, many folks on the left that embrace non-feminism. Surely these numbers will increase as feminism becomes more and more powerful and more and more authoritarian. It doesn't surprise me that r/communism has been overrun by feminists, but the mods for r/anarchism are dropping the ball. I would very much like to see a far-left anti-feminist website to compete with A Voice for Men (which tilts heavily toward right-libertarianism/conservatism). Would create it myself but am too busy at…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 09:20 AM
17

Crowe is pretty badass. That South Park episode wasn't for nothing. The fact that he is one of like...what...one in 10,000 actors to speak out against circumcision makes him gold in my book.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 09:09 AM
2

Great post. The goal of feminism is to torture men. Everything else is incidental.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 10:36 PM
9

She had it coming.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 12:07 PM
5

Great piece: "Everything is set to a female-to-male ratio, ignoring gaps indicated by a male-to-female ratio."
/r/MensRights05/01/15 12:04 PM
12

Feminists argue that women are essentially like children, and cannot be held responsible for their actions, especially while intoxicated; at the same time, feminists argue that women should have equal rights to men. These two beliefs are not compatible. Pick one.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 10:09 AM
3

Horrifying.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 09:59 AM
22

So according to one of the feminists linked, nerds are “the most useless and deficient individuals in society." I wonder if this delightful woman has ever stopped and considered exactly which group of people made "women's lib" possible in the first place? You know, the people who invented things like birth control pills, condoms, safe abortion, time-saving devices in the home etc. etc. Oh My God, most of them were nerds! It is quite telling that nerds, despite having disproportionately favourabl…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 09:54 PM
1

Watch the video Einstein. Or don't you accept video footage as evidence? Watch it: hopefully you will learn something. Incidentally, poor people were heavily involved in Occupy. As well as rich twits. Hence the conflict. The important point to recognize is that Occupy was still growing, even internationally, when the FEDS brought down the hammer. If you're not concerned about civil liberties for people you disagree with, you're a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 03:17 AM
17

"Do you renounce Satan [the patriarchy] and all his wicked ways!?" Perhaps the feminists should throw Cuoco in a lake and see if she floats. If she emerges from the water wearing a "This is what a feminist looks like!" T-shirt made by a woman in Bangladesh paid 60 cents an hour then she is good to go, and can be welcomed into the church -- er -- "Sisterhood."
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:59 AM
1

Occupy Wall Street received near-universal negative coverage in the dominant media. The NY Times didn't even report on it for the first several weeks. Despite this, polls demonstrated that the movement had solid majority support amongst Americans. It was not for lack of support that the movement failed. Lack of nerve, perhaps, since anyone who cared to look could easily find youtube videos of police brutalizing peaceful protesters. It is now known that the police were actually dropping off drunk…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 11:05 PM
-1

It is laughable to compare GamerGate to Occupy Wall Street. Occupy Wall Street was taking on the most powerful interests in society. They were targeted by DHS, FBI and local PD's, many of which actually worked in conjunction with the major banks to disrupt the movement. Claims that "social justice warriors" and "anarchists" (anarchists actually began the movement) were responsible for the its downfall have no basis in reality. The evictions, which used maximum sub-lethal force, were coordinated …
/r/MensRights02/01/15 08:50 PM
2

Why in the Hell am I being downvoted!? Tell ya what, male downvoters, sit with your legs together for the next several months, especially if you take transit. I certainly do not have elephantine balls, they seem pretty normal, but if some alleged man comes on here and claims that he feels no discomfort when he sits with his legs parallel for an extended length of time, I call bullshit. What conclusion should I reach other than "he has tiny balls." ? I'm trying to be generous here, not assuming h…
/r/MensRights01/01/15 01:54 AM
-1

No offense buddy but you might just have really small balls. I find it VERY uncomfortable, even painful, to sit with my legs parallel for any length of time.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 09:53 PM
4

Yes, please continue making these awesome videos. I personally know many men whose opinions on gender and feminism have been turned upside down just by watching a few of your vids. Keep up the great work!
/r/MensRights31/12/14 09:28 PM
1

This is a different article. Much better imo. It doesn't criticize but celebrates masculinity.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 08:37 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44ojS4UNn8I
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:42 AM
5

Great analysis. The methodology involved these sorts of studies is very often deeply flawed. I'm reminded of a study that purported to prove that dogs are more intelligent than cats. Now, I have no problem with such an idea, but the study itself was completely ridiculous. The "scientist" demonstrated that dogs are much better at pulling on strings to acquire food, and therefore concluded that cats have little or no understanding of cause and effect. The problem, as any cat owner cat tell you, is…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 01:45 AM
9

Damn. I was hoping to see Karen legitimately shitfaced.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 03:53 AM
1

I just did a search of this subreddit for "Rogan" and came up with the following: "She might be too smart for me. I'll have to double up on me alpha brains…But yeah, I would love to talk to that woman on the podcast. She's smart as fuck." So what's the deal here? Is the big tough UFC guy Joe Rogan too chicken to have lil' ole Karen Straughan on his show? ;)
/r/MensRights19/12/14 12:26 AM
3

Don't listen to Rogan but am vaguely aware of him. Fans should email him and ask if he has the balls to invite Karen Straughan on his show and defend his views.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 10:19 PM
49

It makes a perverted sort of sense. Insecure young women are concocting sexual assault/rape narratives in order to (a) garner sympathy and attention and (b) inflate, in the minds of their peers, their alleged desirability to the opposite sex. This is the natural end-result of feminist victimhood culture. I suspect that real rape victims are not in the habit of celebrating their victimization. They suffered real trauma. More and more women seem to be virtually bragging about these alleged experie…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 10:53 AM
7

It's called androcide and is extremely common in war. The logic is pretty simple -- boys soon become teenagers/men and teenage boys/men are effective fighters. Alexander did in Tyre. The US did in Fallujah.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 05:46 AM
36

Read the first two pages of comments and they all condemned the piece for its appalling bigotry. A few posters even suggested that it may be time to start pursuing hate speech charges against feminists. Frankly I'm surprised this hasn't happened yet in countries like the UK. The Guardian can't seem to go a week without publishing openly misandrist articles.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 03:26 AM
-7

So, yeah, you're a Republican or libertarian or something? Congratulations. What do you want a hat? Yours is a profoundly idiotic response.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 11:36 PM
-6

This woman "Jackie" not only deserves to be named and shamed but should be subject to criminal prosecution. That the mods of even the "Men's rights" sub-reddit feel it necessary to "protect the wimenz!" on this score demonstrates, yet again, that we live in a profoundly gynocentric culture. Protect the wimenz. Sacrifice the men.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 08:51 PM
2

"[Feminism]is the most socially destructive movement perhaps in the history of the world — and I mean that in the scientific sense," he emphasizes. "Every single culture, every single nation that’s adopted feminism [as a dominant philosophy] is now dying out. Feminism means death."
/r/MensRights05/12/14 02:15 PM
0

Okay. Well I don't support "hate speech" laws on principle. And men are used to this garbage. But when some hideous skank is given a national platform to demonize little boys who can't defend themselves there should be some push back. Where are all the goddamn "real feminists" speaking out against this blatant misandry? Where are all the "mother bears?" At the very least people should write the fucking advertisers of the T. Star.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 11:21 AM
2

"guys you love it." I very much doubt that. Men and woman are very different in their motivations. When asked, by far the most important component of a relationship for men is "respect." If young men want to do this sort of thing -- great, provided the man is properly compensated. But will countries pass laws penalizing women for buying sex? I doubt that. And therein lies the problem. As always, the double standard rears its ugly head.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 09:40 AM
2

Canadians love men and women both. Our politicians are another matter entirely....
/r/MensRights02/12/14 09:30 AM
3

Canada has hate speech laws. Why is this disgusting freak allowed to continue spewing her hate against men and boys?
/r/MensRights02/12/14 09:28 AM
0

wrong thread...
/r/MensRights02/12/14 05:48 AM
6

"The macho chat disturbs me. Any woman who walks in front of the van is assessed as to whether she would “get it” or not. The men I work with would be appalled if I accused them of misogyny or sexism – they love their wives and girlfriends dearly – but they refuse to acknowledge that their “harmless banter” normalises the sexual objectification of women." For a supposed "leftist" rag like the Guardian this is appallingly elitist tripe. I would be surprised if this was actually written by a manua…
/r/MensRights30/11/14 01:59 PM
0

If it's fair for a CEO to make a thousand times that of a worker, then indeed right wing "libertarians" treat everyone equally ;)
/r/MensRights30/11/14 11:25 AM
7

The good slave project.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 09:51 AM
6

She's certainly batshit crazy.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 08:55 AM
42

"I hate that I can be made to feel this way, from annoyance at being wrenched out my thoughts and into alert mode." Muh feelz! Muh feeeelz! Protect me patriarchal state from the patriarchy! Newsflash snowflake: men feel annoyed all the time, and yes, even threatened. We suck it up and deal with it. Daddy patriarchy cannot protect you from every minor annoyance in life. You can have equality, or you can have special safety snowflake privileges, but you cannot have both. Or can you? For a time, pe…
/r/MensRights30/11/14 04:58 AM
36

Who gives a shit? There are much more important things to focus on, such as teaching boys about their patriarchal privilege and telling them not to rape. Also, some boys have a habit of playing games like "cops and robbers" etc., which encourages toxic masculinity. The real victims here are the female teachers, who bravely risk sexual assault every day just being in the presence of these little monsters. In all seriousness, we'd probably be better off just scrapping grades entirely and coming up…
/r/MensRights29/11/14 09:07 AM
17

Awesome. Johnny B. Good ;)
/r/MensRights28/11/14 05:08 PM
12

This is almost unbelievable. An explicitly anti-feminist film refashioned as a feminist epic. Why should I be surprised? "Feminism" is whatever a particular female feelz about a particular event at X moment in time. There is Zero logical consistency.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 04:30 PM
2

lol
/r/MensRights28/11/14 04:24 PM
40

I disagree. Most (non coffee shop) feminists have bad haircuts as is. And bad dye jobs to boot.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 02:45 PM
2

Doesn't Canada have hate speech laws? Couldn't this qualify?
/r/MensRights28/11/14 12:36 PM
107

Barbers are going about this the wrong way. They should go ahead and cut feminist's hair -- just really, really badly.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 12:27 PM
1

Love Karen but I would caution her not to get too carried away with Steven Pinker, whom she discusses at length on the program. Though I agree with some of Pinker's observations, his book "Better Angels" has been effectively debunked, most notably by the anthropologist R. Brian Ferguson: http://www.ncas.rutgers.edu/sites/fasn/files/Pinker's%20List%20-%20Exaggerating%20Prehistoric%20War%20Mortality%20(2013).pdf Simply put, the archeological record does not at all support Pinker's thesis -- it sho…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 04:04 AM
3

Rosa Luxembourg refereed to first wave feminists as parasites of parasites.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 02:22 AM
4

It's telling that this post has been down-voted to hell. And people wonder why MRA's are compared to white supremacists! There is clear, unambiguous, statistically verified evidence that black males are overwhelmingly subject to violence by the state. Males in general are subject to violence by the state -- in fact the sexual divide is even bigger than the racial divide -- but some people would prefer to embrace a black/white/libertarian narrative than deal with reality. Shame on you.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 06:41 AM
2

Great piece by Esmay.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 07:13 AM
2

Keep dreaming :)
/r/MensRights25/11/14 07:00 AM
0

I'll stop now, as there is no point in continuing. If you're not willing to at least acknowledge an alternate point of view, what is the point?
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:23 AM
0

I read your first paragraph. You're simply wrong. Read a recent anthropology book, text book even, and by recent I mean in the last 100 years. The opinions of anthropologists haven't changed, except for a few arguing that war was common vs. war was extremely rare. You shouldn't view me as an adversary, I've simply read a lot on this topic.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:20 AM
0

"Islamic groups" commit atrocities, indeed. What about Christian groups, or Jewish groups, or Hindu groups, or Buddhist groups. Or non-religious groups. Or simply people with too much power -- which causes about nine-tenths of the atrocities in our world. Why are you so concerned about Islam? And have you noticed that the Pentagon's strategic goals are perfectly in line with your hatred of Islam?
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:14 AM
1

Stop it with the "Jew behind every Olive tree" stuff. I'm not the one condemning religious people to eternal atheist hell fire. I'm simply illustrating a point. You were right though re: criticism of all religions, apologies, I overlooked your previous post. You know as well as I that Dawkins and other nu-atheists/bigots spend about 100x time more attacking Islam than Judaism or animism or Hinduism etc. It's all very convenient. Not because people are engaging in a conspiracy (though many are), …
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:08 AM
0

The Pinkerton Detective Agency had a close relationship with the Department of Justice. America has one of the most violent labor histories out of all modern nations. Whenever private mercenaries failed, the state would call in the National Guard or some other force in order to prevent working people from achieving a living wage. And you don't think workers had a right to defend themselves? Exhibit A: The Ludlow massacre. What in the world made you think that a politician or a robber baron was "…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 04:45 AM
0

Actually, anarchists completely reject right wing propertyism aka libertarianism. The "libertarian" movement was founded by millionaires. Capital can be just as oppressive as the state.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 04:36 AM
0

Virtually all anthropologists are in agreement that we have traditionally lived in egalitarian societies, ie highly anarchistic. Not "pure anarchy," since there is no such thing, but anarchistic. Notice that there is a difference between hunter-gatherer bands and stationary chiefdoms -- chiefdoms evolved fairly recently (though were still highly egalitarian compared to statist societies, which were invariably based on slavery) Hunter-gatherer bands had no place for institutional hierarchy, the p…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 04:31 AM
0

There were 4 year year old children working in coal mines when Emma Goldman made her statements regarding violence. It is madness to think that the state should be able to engage in violence against starving people while those same starving people should not be able to engage in violence against their oppressors? Do you not believe in self defence? Or is your religion the state?
/r/MensRights25/11/14 04:04 AM
1

Anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron. Indeed the first use of the term "libertarian" in the US referred to anarchists, as a way of distinguishing them from Marxists. Libertarianism is a reactionary philosophy born from fear of any sort of common ownership. Individualist anarchists like Benjamin Tucker rejected capitalism but embraced markets, so there is certainly room for compromise, but the dictatorship of capital is a non-starter. There were completely privatized towns in late 19th Century Ameri…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 04:01 AM
1

"Minarchism is very similar." There are definitely similarities, and some small "a" anarchists even speak fondly of "Republican" town hall assemblies such as existed before the Constitutional Convention, wherein "that lesser class of men" (ie workers) were afforded a voice in decision making. Certainly preferable to the plutocracy that resulted. Many of the anti-federalists were quite anarchistic in sentiment. However a better analogy in terms of anarchism would be that of the Iroquois federatio…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 03:56 AM
0

Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights25/11/14 03:43 AM
0

This "non practical" form of social organization was the way we survived for 99.9% of our history. I really wish they would teach anthropology in high-school.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 03:25 AM
-6

The woman is a neocon propaganda tool. WikiLeaks documents, entitled, “CIA Red Cell Special Memorandum: Afghanistan: Sustaining West European Support for the NATO-led Mission-Why Counting on Apathy Might Not Be Enough”. “Appeals by President Obama and Afghan Women Might Gain Traction”: "Afghan women could serve as ideal messengers in humanizing the ISAF role in combating the Taliban because of women’s ability to speak personally and credibly about their experiences under the Taliban, their aspir…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 03:17 AM
1

As opposed to the benign history of Christianity (*cough multiple genocides), or indeed the secular imperialism of "liberal democracies."
/r/MensRights25/11/14 03:09 AM
0

"Christian" nations have killed immeasurably more people than "Islamic" nations. That's just a fact of history. Indeed if we take into account structural violence imposed by US-dominanted groups like the IMF and World Bank we're talking about hundreds of millions of easily preventable deaths. Islamic violence is a drop in the bucket, and in any case, radical Islamists have continually been funded by CIA (and even the Israeli Mossad) in order to divide and conquer the Middle East, with predictabl…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 03:08 AM
2

Do you speak the same way about Jews? Have you read the Talmud? Some pretty crazy shit in the there, far more bizarre than anything in the Koran. No? You don't? Of course not. Because you're being strung along by the military industrial complex.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 03:01 AM
0

I was referring to the Muslim Brotherhood and Nasser. Learn your history.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 02:59 AM
5

Will the group allow criticism of feminism and patriarchy theory? Exploration of false statistics? Female privilege? The demonization of men and boys? Legal issues that privilege women? The problem with a lot of "men's groups" set up by feminists (male or female) is that men are portrayed as somehow malicious or deficient and therefore in need of "correcting". Masculinity is "toxic" whereas femininity is the imagined ideal. It is also assumed that the best way for men to address their problems i…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 02:32 AM
0

It's called "cause and effect." Pretty simple stuff.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:10 AM
4

They tried to "modernize." In Egypt, in Iran, in Afghanistan, across the region. The US and Britain responded by overthrowing these governments and funding previously marginal extremist sects.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:09 AM
1

Islam is no more barbaric than any of the other Abrahamic faiths. You're simply a bigot. Ironically, the rise of radical Islam is directly traceable to US intervention. Islamic extremists were supported by the West (this continues, incidentally) as a means of combating Arab secular nationalism, which in turn threatened profits for US and British corporations. This was explicitly outlined by John Foster Dulles, and Brzezinski wasn't exactly shy about it either. Indeed the most backwards Islamic r…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 04:38 AM
-4

I'm certainly not applauding. Anti-Muslim bigotry is a useful tool to provide ideological justification for Western (and Israeli) imperial ambitions in the Middle East. Feminists are useful idiots in this respect.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 03:59 AM
-3

Well done skippy! Now please count 1, 3, 3. Patriarchy! Leftists!
/r/MensRights20/11/14 06:30 AM
1

Nevermind.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:02 AM
2

Just starting to listen now... What's up with the voice modifier? Is discussing men's issues really that controversial? Apparently it is...
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:00 AM
0

The commies are coming! Leftists! Socialists! Anarchists! Ho-hum. More drivel from reactionaries. It would shock these ideologues to learn that the woman who first transcribed Marx to English in the US was kicked out of first wave feminism; that anarchists like Emma Goldman and unions like the IWW repudiated the Suffragists; and that Mother Jones referred to feminists as the wives of plutocrats. But that won't do. We have to force people into our little boxes so we can continue with useless part…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:35 AM
3

Interesting. I just posted this an another thread: "So now we have several potential reasons why men tend to spread their legs while sitting: (1) cylindrical thighs (2) desire not to crush balls (3) in crammed public transport, it may be the most efficient use of space ie far from being "aggressive" it is as an attempt to make others more comfortable (4) men are expressing "micro-aggressions" against women because patriarchy." You've added a fifth: males are attempting to express dominance over …
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:12 AM
4

"How about we spend our time talking about how we can raise women out of poverty and trafficking in third world countries?" Why just women? Honestly, I think it's time for feminism to go. It's just creating division where none is necessary. Women, girls and boys tend to be trafficked for sexual purposes, men for labour purposes. It's all human trafficking and it's all horrific. As for the West lifting the third world out of poverty, one of the most effective means of doing so would be for Wester…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:59 AM
7

You're exactly right. I never even thought of it that way even though I have done this myself. So now we have several potential reasons why men tend to spread their legs while sitting: (1) cylindrical thighs (2) desire not to crush balls (3) in crammed public transport, it may the most efficient use of space ie far from being "aggressive" it is as an attempt to make others more comfortable (4) men are expressing "micro-aggressions" against women because patriarchy. Guess which one of these theor…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:47 AM
2

I don't think men are in the habit of climbing onto other people's seats and sitting on their laps while on public transit. If you're talking about some boorish clown who spreads his legs like a woman at the gynaecologist when there are other people seated next to him, then sure, but I took public transit twice a day for several years and never once encountered this. I don't doubt it happens occasionally (though it isn't nearly as inconvenient as a woman putting shopping bags on the seat next to…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:21 AM
1

Great point. As for "lending credence" to the dictionary definition of feminism, I added brackets to avoid exactly that.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:00 AM
2

Yet another example of feminists being utterly clueless about the male experience and misattributing perfectly normal and healthy behaviour to malice and aggression. All they had to do was ask a man why we sit as we do -- we don't want to crush our nuts. If feminists continue to be indulged by the state with everything they ask for (they call this a "patriarchy" lmao), it's only a matter of time before virtually every male behaviour will be demonized or even rendered illegal. This is truly Twili…
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:58 AM
-11

Delete
/r/MensRights18/11/14 10:53 AM
2

Marx was not a feminist. The term hadn't even been invented yet. In fact there's a whole slew of feminist literature attacking Marx. Feminism has actually severely weakened class struggle because it has replaced the fundamental issue of class with gender. It's simple divide and conquer. Under feminism, a male coal minor is "privileged" compared to a female CEO. Instead of people struggling against the ruling class, men and women are encouraged to fight against each other. This is a bit of a wet …
/r/MensRights18/11/14 10:27 AM
48

Best post in the comments: "Holy hell, I didn't think it was possible to make Mark Zuckerberg sympathetic, but you just did it with your clueless nonsense and wild allegations. Congratulations." Out of ALL the things we could be criticizing Zuckerberg for, we settle on gray T-shirts? Feminism has officially gone insane.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 04:08 AM
30

'Fashion is a form of ugliness so intolerable that we have to alter it every six months.' -- Oscar Wilde
/r/MensRights17/11/14 02:11 AM
9

Um, shouldn't the cop be the one being sued? For sexual assault?
/r/MensRights16/11/14 10:45 AM
3

Even the man-hater Amanda Marcotte is apologizing for feminist hysteria over the T-shirt. You might want to just stop posting on these threads in order to save yourself embarrassment.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 10:44 AM
1

This is a classic example of the echo-chamber. Read the comments. Everyone is quite convinced that the MRM is comprised of backward misogynist assholes. Sigh.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 11:39 PM
10

I'm a leftist. I'm not opposed to the Time magazine poll. In fact I voted for feminism.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 04:53 PM
8

I stayed out of the Ray Rice threads because I thought he used, shall we say, excessive force, in response to his girlfriend's abuse. This case is different. The young lady verbally harassed the guy for several minutes, made fun of his speech impediment, and hit him in the head with her purse. He was stuck in the train and had nowhere to go. He didn't cold cock her. She didn't suffer any injuries. She had it coming.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:03 PM
1

Sorry, meant "Michael Collins." :) Altered the post. Seriously it's worth a look.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 08:26 AM
3

Michael Parenti's "Imperialism 101" is a good place to start w/respect imperialism and slavery. Where did you think the word "slave" came from? It comes from Slav, ie Slavic people. European monarchs and plutocrats engaged in intra-European imperialism and slavery for a long, long time before they started to venture outwards. Moreover, virtually every kingdom in history has engaged in slavery. As noted by anthropologists like R. Brian Ferguson, the very first states in history were slave states,…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 06:35 AM
3

Truly excellent. Should be sent to coffee shop feminists with sons everywhere.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 05:37 AM
2

"men were the only people to hold power. White, land holding men." You are essentially minimizing this man's experience for something that happened hundreds of years ago. This is why feminism is so toxic. Equally important, you have absolutely no understanding of history, let alone power dynamics. Women have always had the social power, as the original feminists openly acknowledged. Now you have both social and political power, and continue to think you are somehow "oppressed." Go ahead and stud…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 05:34 AM
15

Precisely. The Occupy movement created a slogan about the "99%." It was useful as a rhetorical device, but the cold hard stats are even more disturbing. Some mathematician -- I forget who (it's covered in the documentary "Lifting the Veil") made an analogy: the average person has a set of building blocks about 5 feet tall (their wealth); doctors, lawyers etc. have a set of building blocks about 15 or 20 feet tall; then there's the super rich, about 0.01 percent of the population. Their wealth is…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 05:01 AM
19

You nailed it. In fact if you look at the stats it's more like 0.01 percent of the population.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 01:39 AM
1

Excellent piece.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:52 PM
2

I have a proposal that would make approximately as much sense as the new "guilty until proven innocent" laws demanded by feminists: dunking. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunking Ordeal by water was associated with the witch hunts of the 16th and 17th centuries: an accused who sank was considered innocent, while floating indicated witchcraft. These tests came to be part of what is known as the Salem Witch Trials. Some argued that witches floated because they had renounced baptism when entering th…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:24 PM
5

OP is right to draw attention to the issue. One of the biggest problems with the feminist movement is that it is completely schizophrenic. There is really no overriding set of principles or beliefs except, "how do you, as a woman, feel about x at this particular moment in time?" combined with "And how are men to blame?" Thus: some feminists are allegedly "pro-sex," while some want to see prostitution and pornography and basically any expression of male sexuality banned. Some feminists think it i…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 09:12 PM
9

You missed the best part: "While the complainant said she was upset with the events of March 22, she did not initially consider the encounter to be an instance of sexual misconduct. A few days later, however, the complainant was surprised when her friends said the respondent’s actions constituted rape because her level of intoxication rendered her unable to give consent."
/r/MensRights08/11/14 11:17 PM
65

Little boys are merely rapists in waiting. They should be aborted before they can harm the better sex. Now, I'm guessing many here will call my statement hyperbole, but take a look around the radfem websites. If it is true, as many feminists suggest, that "male" attributes are the cause of all war and misery in life, then why not eliminate the cause of all war and misery? Namely males? It's actually not surprising that some feminists take this idea to its endpoint. Feminists who argue that men s…
/r/MensRights07/11/14 02:21 AM
1

What are you daft? Men belong in prison, not women. Men are dangerous, violent sex beasts, whereas women are kind, nurturing mother-figures. Just ask Gertrude Baniszewski.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 02:05 AM
0

Do you support the idea of the state forcing people into service of plutocrats? In case you didn't realize, our "wars" have nothing whatsoever to do with freedom and democracy. I support including women in mandatory service to the state, because that would quickly eliminate it. Daddy's little darling forced to fight in wars? You better believe that shit would be nipped in the bud.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 01:46 AM
32

You know the feminist movement is in trouble when people can't tell whether their propaganda is satire or an earnest message. After viewing the logos at the end I'm pretty sure this is NOT, in fact, satire. The idea here is apparently to show that "consent is sexy." What it actually shows is one of the most awkward simulated sex scenes ever caught on camera.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:03 PM
3

Feminism has managed to glom on to a whole slew of legitimate civil rights groups. The idea is "shared oppression," or if you like, "intersectionality." The problem is that, unlike gays, or blacks, or workers trying to form a union, women have always had distinct privileges in society. So it doesn't really work. If you go back and read the radfems from the 60's and 70's there was quite a bit of anti-gay hatred (ironically, much of this came from lesbians). Some of it is so hateful it would raise…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:43 PM
2

This is appalling.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:57 AM
2

I can sorta see your point, but I think people underestimate how abusive relationships can grow out of control. When you consider that highly intelligent people can be brainwashed by cults, or that the likes of Patty Hearst became a bank robber for the SLA after a few weeks in a closet, I think a little compassion is in order. This is especially true for males, who have little to no recourse when dealing with an abusive spouse. Keep in mind that many men end up in jail when they report abuse, th…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:35 PM
7

I become deeply upset when I see the phrase "trigger warning" used on websites. Can someone please create a trigger warning for trigger warnings?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:53 PM
11

Feminists are abusing boys en masse.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:46 AM
3

You're an extremely sick person. Seek help.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:44 AM
2

I think these kinds of posts are useful insofar as they reveal the hypocrisy of feminists. I would much rather have my balls cupped than be punched in the face, and I said as much in my post. For women it's obviously different, because they face different issues. But if feminists insist on portraying males as sex beast pedophiles, then why not hold up a mirror?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:11 AM
1

Do you have a source for her husband's net worth? If true that would make this one of most offensive articles ever written. I realize that being offensive is Valenti's schtick, but to argue that men should be paid LESS when she is a billionaire is right up there with the most elitist rants in history.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:49 AM
1

Not these days, but back when I was a teen/early 20-year-old I repeatedly had my ass slapped, nipples pinched, and on three different occasions my sac cupped. All out of the blue by girls I wasn't interested in. To be honest it didn't bother me much -- I was more concerned with the possibility of getting in fights with other males. Which hurts. A lot. A couple of things that do bother me in retrospect (at the time I was too young and stupid to even realize what was going on) -- when my T-ball co…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 11:58 PM
5

This is literally the solution. Right there.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:34 AM
8

Superb article. Hopefully this will get more up-votes. A few excerpts: It takes an extraordinary amount of privilege to even begin to make this mistake. Don’t believe me? Go explain to a child soldier in Africa, or a woman being stoned to death in the Middle East that you feel persecuted when someone says hi to you in public. Let me know what they say. -- If you want to see oppression, go find one of the black men sitting on a stoop and have him walk around in her neighborhood for ten hours with…
/r/MensRights03/11/14 11:10 PM
2

Suck it up snowflake. There are people with real problems in the world.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:55 PM
3

"That, of course, is not to say that white men don’t have their own predatory nature—one that is expressed in ways unique to their privilege." Yes, of course, because all men have a "predatory nature" and "white men" are a borg like collective with equal amounts of "privilege." There was a time when this sort of hate speech was limited to the fringes of radical feminism. Today it is saturating the mainstream. An enterprising MRA in a country with hate speech laws (like Canada) should consider us…
/r/MensRights03/11/14 07:55 PM
5

Chappelle is MRA all the way. Also a brilliant comedian.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 03:05 AM
2

Stop embarrassing yourself. Shut up. And listen.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:28 AM
2

You're happy, you little shit.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:27 AM
2

Dude is getting positively hammered in the comments. Though no shortage of white nights as per usual.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:17 AM
1

He actually did, in one reply. I'm too lazy to go back and find the passage.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:22 PM
2

Wow. That was a monumental smackdown by Bowspearer. Nice to see such arguments coming from a leftist/egalitarian perspective as well. It's also a somewhat frustrating read, because it demonstrates how difficult it is to get ideologues to change their minds, even when presented with compelling evidence. They are so emotionally invested in their particular word-view that they seem incapable of acknowledging error.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:21 PM
12

In 3 hours this guy gets substantially more "harassment" than the woman in the other video, who had to spend ten hours walking around the poorest neighbourhoods to get two minutes of footage.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:08 PM
10

The Princess and the Pea In times past it was considered uppity, if not downright seditious, for poor people to look their betters in the eye. Certainly they were not supposed to speak to said betters before being spoken to. There are quite a few horror stories from maids and butlers in modern-day celebrity households involving punishment or dismissal if the servant dared look their employer in the eye. "A cat may look upon a king," but not a servant. With "stare rape" and "Good morning = sexual…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:10 PM
0

Pretty low for the Onion, but I still chuckled a couple of times -- for the opposite reasons of the denizens of 2X.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 09:38 PM
1

Yay, more bashing of leftists and conflating leftists with liberal capitalists (and indeed, conservative capitalists) who in fact use social issues to divide the people. The important thing to stress here is the left/right dichotomy is as simplistic as patriarchy theory. In case anyone hasn't noticed, Democrats and Republicans are basically interchangeable except for hot -button social issues that don't affect the bottom line. In fact, if you look at the second half of the 20th C, Democrats were…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 09:05 PM
-2

"Libertarians" are best called "propertyists." They care about property above all else.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 04:51 PM
3

You're quite correct. But you contradict yourself. The link isn't "tenuous."
/r/MensRights26/10/14 10:18 PM
2

"Prof. Alan Dershowitz -- a titan of the criminal bar --" You mean the plagiarist who thinks torture is awesome and that Israel has the most moral army in the world? OJ Simpson guy? Yeah, might wanna avoid referencing the Dersh in future drafts. He is rightly considered a monumental douche amongst the majority; it's unfortunate that he penned his name to the righteous Harvard manifesto.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 01:42 PM
24

He's a man with feelings -- KILL HIM!
/r/MensRights22/10/14 11:32 AM
15

I doubt most people here care much about F-bombs, or relatedly, a nipple on a television show. The most disturbing factor is clearly that the young girl repeats bogus statistics. This video could even be considered a form of child abuse. It's not even about left or right, it's about basic human decency; the people who made this video have none.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:27 AM
2

It is absurd to describe the Democrat Party as "leftist." Historically the Democrats have been at the forefront of attacking leftist radicals, largely as a means of proving their bona fides to the corporate interests that control both parties.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:52 AM
12

Another once noble institution falls to feminism. In case the feminists lurking here haven't figured it out yet, men bend over backwards to please women. Patriarchy theory is bunk. Time to start using your immense power for good rather than evil. Males and females should not be at war. We should be helping one another.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:11 AM
1

Pretty remarkable comment section there.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 06:23 AM
1

Thanks, interesting...
/r/MensRights14/10/14 05:33 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 04:17 AM
0

Someone posted a reading list from a "gender studies" course at a Canadian University a few weeks ago. There were hundreds of books on feminism, several dozen on LGBT people, and about 7 on "Masculinity." Though I can't remember the titles, I'm gonna take a wild guess and suggest that Warren Farrel's work was not part of the curriculum, whereas "toxic masculinity" was probably covered in depth. I'm not sure there is an easy way to alter these profoundly sexist and bigoted gender studies programs…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 01:24 AM
1

Appalling sexism against men and boys.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 06:49 AM
4

No is no. Yes is yes. No is yes. Yes is no. Maybe is yes. Maybe is no. Maybe is maybe. No is yes is no is yes is maybe is yes/no/maybe fucking rapist. Where's my mattress?
/r/MensRights05/10/14 07:15 AM
8

I can practically smell the privilege wafting off all those miners, pest controllers, drywall installers, plumbers, roofers, etc. etc. Wait, that's not privilege...It's blood, sweat and tears. I'd like to see feminists organize a "Thank a man!" day. Instead of whining about stare-rape on the subway they could write letters of thanks to men for providing them with a roof over their heads, indoor plumbing, electricity and other luxuries they apparently take for granted. I'm dead serious. If you're…
/r/MensRights04/10/14 09:45 PM
10

Laci Green can go fuck herself. Anyone who attempts to censor the net is a douche. Nuff said.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 12:39 AM
-1

time to lick your wounds and go home kid. You lost. Badly.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 12:32 AM
2

No.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:54 PM
6

It's really simple. Feminists should launch a counter-campaign on pedophilia, stressing that women are just as likely to be abusers as men. Therefore men are not raving pedophilic sex beasts, men love children in the RIGHT way, and are great teachers. Yes, this will happen :( She for he?
/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:47 PM
-3

Hey, throw us a bone motherfucker. Surely you're aware of pussypass?
/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:39 PM
3

There's nothing wrong with being a "left-winger." Only in the the USA is this considered an insult. Something to keep in mind. It has nothing to do with feminism. Feminism sinks its fangs into anything that crosses its path, left or right. We should be working together rather than dividing ourselves according to these outdated and simplistic political models.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 03:12 AM
8

How long before it becomes a crime to look a woman in the eye? If these snowflakes are so delicate they should just stay indoors like the Bubble boy.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 05:26 PM
6

Are you nuts? The female equivalent would need an encyclopaedia.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 12:57 PM
1

The unfortunate aspect of the Honey Badger radio show is that the hosts are constantly attacking "leftists." This effectively marginalizes about half of the potential audience. AVFM is basically the same way. If the goal is to promote right wing libertarianism and Milton Friedman, these groups should go ahead and say it. I decided to stop listening after last week's program, which amounted to an hour long attack against imaginary "leftists." I think it would be worthwhile for the badgers to lear…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 10:49 AM
1

The comments are even worse than the article. Those horrible men! If only society could do away with men, children could live in peace. "Comments are pre-moderated." We know what that means.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 10:24 AM
45

Females have always enjoyed social power. The vast, vast majority of social power.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 02:25 PM
1

Yeah well, police suck. http://www.amazon.ca/Our-Enemies-Blue-America-Revised/dp/0896087719
/r/MensRights29/09/14 12:44 PM
4

Marcotte is actually hilarious. The trick is to read her material as satire.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 11:24 AM
2

Excellent post.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 11:17 AM
-4

I find you sickening. Just wanted you to know that.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 11:05 AM
2

Don't let the door hit you, "Infanticide Aquifer." *Shiver.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 10:41 AM
2

what about the fine young cannibals?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 11:00 PM
1

The Democrats are a far right wing political party.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 03:00 PM
3

Emma likes Alpha jocks. Her speech is hypocritical bullshit. Next.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 01:55 PM
9

"You're lucky we stopped that too because your post has me convinced you'd be locked up right next to them." This from the guy who wrote: I say just kill the kid and forget him. Death penalty all day. You're in great company: (New York) - Only three countries - Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Sudan - are known to have executed an individual since the beginning of 2009 for a crime committed before age 18, Human Rights Watch said today. "Countries around the world have banned this barbaric punishment for …
/r/MensRights24/09/14 07:22 AM
4

"ineffective." Depends on what your goal is. Most people commit several crimes a day without even realizing it. So if the goal was to kill everyone in the society then execution for crime would be an excellent course of action. In terms of deterring violent crime, however, it doesn't work.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 06:50 AM
7

Get out of here with your "logic" and "facts." Science is a tool of the devil!
/r/MensRights24/09/14 06:41 AM
9

America is the only country in the world to sentence youth to die in prison without any hope of release, and today about 2,500 people in the U.S. are serving life without parole sentences for crimes they committed when they were juveniles.4 There are many more in prison who did crimes when they were under 18 years old, serving what amounts to life sentences—given 60- or 70-year sentences which guarantee they will die behind bars. This completely cruel and unjust situation exists even though the …
/r/MensRights24/09/14 06:38 AM
9

If people were actually interested in preventing crime and murder they would not advocate primitive punishment models, they would stress rehabilitation and look at what actually causes crime. However that would deny us the pleasure of burning the witch/child and licking our lips in satisfaction over our perceived moral superiority. It's bloodlust, nothing more.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 06:28 AM
10

Only a profoundly sick society treats 13 year old children as "adults." Even if he killed 1000 people it would not change the fact that he was still a kid. His brain wasn't anywhere near fully developed. This is barbarism on par with the old mental institutions where they would lock people up in animal cages. Amnesty International and many other human rights groups have strongly condemned the practice. In a culture that celebrates violence, especially military violence, it's hardly surprising th…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 06:17 AM
1

Damn.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:45 AM
3

If you're not on a list you're doing something wrong.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:06 PM
3

Call it a joke if you must, but I have just registered this sour puss in the patriarchy data base at NSA headquarters. Right next to Kate Moss and other morose females. Even now there are horny male agents monitoring her and encouraging her to smile at every opportunity. Woe betide she who doesn't obey the smiley-faced directives of the patriarchy!
/r/MensRights19/09/14 11:07 AM
15

Don't forget "micro-aggressions" like a man not crossing his legs on the subway after a hard day's work. He should cross those legs and crush his balls.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 10:06 AM
27

Falsely accusing someone of rape is one of the most heinous crimes imaginable. It seems highly unlikely that any government anywhere will pass a law demanding that a false accuser receive equal jail time to a real rapist -- even though being accused of rape essentially ruins one's life. However, I don't think it's unreasonable to demand that if a false accuser is proven beyond reasonable doubt to have lied, that such a person receive at least HALF the punishment of the crime in question. That wo…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 09:35 AM
7

I'm looking in vain for a comment button. I notice that more and more online "news" sources are disallowing comments. Wouldn't want the rubes pointing out errors in the source material. The FemEmpire seems to be particularly susceptible to this de facto censorship practice. Laurie Penny's recent article "'we're winning!" ended with "No comments. Deal." A voice from on high, profoundly privileged. Meanwhile, feminist websites flat-out delete any contrary opinion under the guise of "safe spaces." …
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:12 AM
1

Okay, so I've had lots of down-votes so far...would be happy to debate :)
/r/MensRights11/09/14 11:42 PM
1

My Side of the Mountain
/r/MensRights11/09/14 01:49 AM
7

Wow. This should surely be on the front page of R/feminism. Just kidding :)
/r/MensRights10/09/14 01:36 AM
2

Mostly agree. Wouldn't be surprised. But studies like (female-in-group-bias) X only "measure" people living under certain circumstances. Not "human nature" itself.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 10:14 PM
11

Just in case some of you folks didn't bother reading the essay, here is a choice quote: "...radical feminists actually reduce women to nothing but helpless, cringing near-vegetables, passive victims of male contempt and coercion. This profoundly insults women in a way which the worst patriarchal ideologies — the Jewish notion of woman as a source of pollution, for instance, or the Christian nightmare of woman as temptress and uncontrollable sexual nature-force — fell short of. They defamed woman…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 08:22 PM
1

Cheers.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 07:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter