TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

_name_of_the_user_ Archive

View 20 posts and 1,213 comments by _name_of_the_user_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
255

Misandry_name_of_the_user_/r/AntiFeminists28/12/22 09:36 PM
182

Health_name_of_the_user_/r/MensRights09/08/25 02:55 AM
170

General_name_of_the_user_/r/MensRights21/12/23 08:05 PM
130

_name_of_the_user_/r/AntiFeminists13/12/21 09:32 AM
81

social media_name_of_the_user_/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/22 02:39 AM
54

social media_name_of_the_user_/r/EverydayMisandry21/09/22 01:23 AM
52

social media_name_of_the_user_/r/EverydayMisandry15/06/24 09:25 PM
52

Discussion_name_of_the_user_/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 06:06 PM
46

social media_name_of_the_user_/r/EverydayMisandry06/10/22 01:54 PM
46

social media_name_of_the_user_/r/EverydayMisandry26/11/22 02:30 AM
36

Anti-Feminism_name_of_the_user_/r/AntiFeminists27/12/22 02:07 PM
28

Meme_name_of_the_user_/r/AntiFeminists17/11/22 07:43 PM
25

social media_name_of_the_user_/r/EverydayMisandry23/12/24 09:31 PM
24

Feminism Caused This_name_of_the_user_/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 06:07 PM
23

social media_name_of_the_user_/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/22 12:57 PM
20

social media_name_of_the_user_/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/22 09:35 PM
18

social media_name_of_the_user_/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/24 01:19 PM
10

resource_name_of_the_user_/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/22 05:18 PM
6

social media_name_of_the_user_/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/24 01:11 PM
5

_name_of_the_user_/r/AntiFeminists27/10/21 01:19 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,213 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

So what? Again, your statement doesn't preclude outliers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 12:41 PM
-2

No, I didn't miss it. I commented on it. The supply of single progressive masculine men is low. The supply masculine progressive men, which includes those already in a relationship, is not low. At least according to the dude in the video.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 07:04 PM
5

My disagreement with the video goes beyond that, but you summed up that aspect of it, and why I also disagree with it, perfectly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 11:46 AM
21

Its propaganda to pull people to his side. Its a grift, just not a conservative grift as we're used to seeing bring pointed out. He starts with some points that will make his target audience feel seen. Then he misrepresents the loneliness epidemic in an effort to victim blame men who are suffering and support feminism. Then he goes back to points that will make his target audience feel good about themselves. The purpose is to get people to nod along without thinking too deeply about what he's sa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 11:44 AM
2

No, you don’t get to decide the masculine expression that individual men, or men as a whole, choose to show. Did you respond to wrong person? I made no attempts to decide anything. I said masculine and progressive are two separate things that may or may not coincide.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 11:36 AM
2

It's not. They're two different descriptors of a person that may or may not coincide.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 10:57 AM
-5

You're misunderstanding. As much as I don't like his message it serves no-one to misrepresent it. I don't think you're doing it maliciously, as I said, misunderstanding. He's not saying single progressive masculine men are everywhere. He's only saying progressive masculine men are everywhere. The fact that those men are taken doesn't change what/who they are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 10:55 AM
41

Oh look! Another online talking head who masquerades as progressive while also misrepresenting men's suffering and using it to hurt men instead of supporting men. The loneliness epidemic is about loss of third spaces and the ability to participate in them that afforded men the opportunity for companionship/friendship. That isn't limited to non-progressive men and it isn't about dating. This is exactly the kind of propaganda I hate. He surrounds his vile bull shit in a message that seeks to speak…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 10:50 AM
-1

There's two reason people hate incels. 1) Incels often say negative things about women. Those range from fairly mild and true things to outright lies and hatred. And everything in between. 2) People hate it when someone is Kean to a woman. There's a very common plot device, to make the audience hate the vsd guy the writers show him hitting or being mean to a woman. Instant character development, that's the bad guy and the audience hates him. When you combine those two things you get society hati…
/r/MensRights16/07/26 01:11 AM
26

Neither. The argument is that body shaming is bad. Shaming someone for their weight, breast size, penis size, hair line, etc. is all body shaking and all of it is bad. There doesn't need to be an equivalent. Now go put your strawman away. You can play with it again later.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:00 AM
7

Given that men still hold the majority of leadership positions, I want to highlight how positive and progressive men are in general. We moved from feudalism to capitalism. We went from no one voting to everyond voting. We've gained immense worker protections. Most of the west has ensured women have abortion right. And on and on. Way too many people focus on the worst of men in positions of power and think that represents all men. While men in positions of power aren't representative of men as a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 05:59 PM
8

Easier to get a job, That's a common belief that used to be true, but is no longer. https://www.queermajority.com/essays-all/success-men-now-face-more-hiring-discrimination easier to make friends, This is also not true, and I've never heard anyone say it is. https://www.americansurveycenter.org/why-mens-social-circles-are-shrinking/ more physically able (stronger, taller, etc), This is a double edged sword. Yes, you're more capable when you're within your limits, but you're much less likely to b…
/r/MensRights28/06/26 02:44 AM
7

You have to remember, when a woman is murdered it's because she's a woman and is otherwise innocent. When a man is murdered it's because he deserves it, not because of his sex and he's certainly not innocent. Something something, the patriarchy hurts men too. Something something, women are more valuable and more important, but I'm trying desperately to find a way to convey that without saying it directly because then I'll admit I think men are sub human and disposable. 🙄 Honest to fuck that's ho…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 02:20 PM
27

"Villains who twirl their mustaches are easy to spot. Those who clothe themselves in good deeds are well camouflaged." Picard, TNG,. Drumhead https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-gXI0yH1AA
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 02:02 PM
5

I have a problem with traditional gender roles being enforced, I have no problem with them being chosen.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 04:54 PM
24

The number of men who are MRAs isn't far off. What's your point? Women aren't the enemy. Traditional gender roles and feminists are the enemy.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 10:45 AM
15

Because feminism is a supremacy movement. Trying to advocate for men is a direct action against their movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/26 09:11 AM
11

it's astonishing how quickly they tell on themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/26 09:05 AM
21

https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment A couple more to add to your already excellent collection.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/06/26 11:41 PM
1

Yes please. Why the fuck is that acceptable?
/r/MensRights22/06/26 02:15 PM
23

Basically, they want a Stepford Husband. Does that about sum up what you're saying?
/r/MensRights21/06/26 02:47 PM
8

Misandry often isn't about direct acts, it's about neglect and apathy. It's systemic and structural ways that society doesn't give two shits about men. How many times have you heard people complain that women weren't allowed to work in certain industries? I can't imagine another situation where that could possibly be framed as a negative for women instead of a negative for men. Women weren't allowed to work in those industries because it was too dangerous. But no one gave a shit if men got hurt.…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/06/26 10:40 AM
25

That's so fucking depressing. :(
/r/MensRights16/06/26 10:46 AM
1

Thank you, op. I needed that.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/26 03:13 PM
2

I have PTSD after a career in the military. I've never paid a dime for therapy, the military is still paying for it even though I've been out for 3 years. It still took me over a decade and over half a dozen therapies before I finally found one I connect with. I cannot imagine trying pay for that out of pocket. It's about $230 CAD an hour here. Unless you've got a fantastic work plan, that's completely inaccessible to most people.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/26 03:13 PM
2

Given the fact that feminism is what built all the structural bigotry that undermines men’s basic rights in the first place That is not even close to being true. Society was incredibly sexist, to both sexes, LONG before feminism existed. That sexism was a double edged sword for both sexes. It protected women from failure while also preventing them from success. It reduces class mobility, up or down, for women. For men it increased class mobility, again up or down. That is why there's both more m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/26 11:00 PM
20

Men's liberation (menslib) is a men's movement that only frames men's issues through a feminist lens which ignores any actual causes of men's issues and blames individuals or only men for them. It results in a lot of "patriarch hurts men too", "men need to support men better" and "you should learn to cry more". It's a hate group masquerading as men's rights group.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 02:54 PM
10

🤦‍♂️ I'll see myself out
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 10:37 PM
20

The group who pushes for language standards to prevent sexism in language should be able to come up with non sexist terms. If they don't it's not because they can't. It's because they've chosen not to. They are the experts. They can't claim ignorance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 09:21 PM
10

No, they're not. Female gaze is when media objectifies men for women's entertainment. Just like male gaze is women being objectified for men's entertainment. Don't soften their hypocrisy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 09:20 PM
40

You're expecting consistency from hypocrites. It's not going to happen. Feminists claim to be for gender equality but constantly frame anything good as feminine, and anything bad as masculine. They're hypocrites, they're liers, and they're objectively wrong about most of their talking points.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 01:17 PM
3

It's a pattern of negative reactions to men voicing their feelings or having needs. It's not often a huge sweeping one time punishment, it's just a subtle continuous apathy for men. It's in the language. You see news stories about disasters and see headlines like 100 killed, 50 of them women. It's in our movies. Every bad guy in the vast majority of media being men. It's in academic research. There are hundreds of studies that show men are victims of domestic violence at equal rates to women but…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 10:33 AM
18

That's not how any of this works.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 11:05 PM
27

Wait. Wait. Wait. Are you saying gay men are... men? Woah. That's profound! /s Agreed, we should be celebrating and supporting each other, not competing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 02:51 PM
8

Judge: When you saw that piece of equipment about to fall, whu didn't you tell her she was in danger? Defendant: It's a felony to interrupt in the workplace and she wouldn't stop talking.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 08:43 PM
11

The problem is two fold, one the predatory fees, as was mentioned. And two, the chat bots are literally addictive. They are harming men, this is a topic that we should be discussing and doing what we can to help others.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 07:29 PM
20

Are you talking about women being harmed by the porn industry, or women being harmed by watching porn?
/r/MensRights26/05/26 07:25 PM
5

It is misandrist, that's obvious and this isn't an argument against that. It is also misogynistic. It's done because of belief that women are inherently at a disadvantage, which isn't viewing women equally. This can be a helpful aspect to point out to feminists.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 08:21 PM
1

Seems your answer isn't very constructive, just FUD spreading. Thats odd, that's what I think of your comment. And what I pointed out with my comment, just in much more detail. I don't think you're here as a good faith actor. Your comment is worded exactly as a propaganda peice pulling people towards an alt right position. But to address your response, my comment was very constructive. I pointed out in detail all of the problems I saw in your comment. Which leads me to wondering why you're takin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/26 02:25 PM
2

Reading this I'm reminded of a scene in the movie The Last Castle. The warden wants to punish the prisoners by inciting them into a fight so he can then order the injuring or killing of an inmate. All he does is tell his head guard to only put out one basketball the next day. That's it. That scarcity, especially in an already tense and deprived situation, is enough to cause the fight as two opposing groups want to play ball. Humans are easily manipulated in this way. For better or worse, we're a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/26 02:04 PM
1

This has the feel of something that has just enough truth to keep someone reading and feeling seen, but not enough truth to be considered overall factual in the broader sense. It feels like propaganda. It's very simple. For example, you round up all the women, put them in rich men's harrems, then promise the celibate men 40 virgins in heaven, if they die in a holy war. Like this. Sure, that matches my understanding of Muslim culture and religion. But I know next to nothing about Muslim culture a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/26 01:47 PM
6

Back when the third wave of feminism (also known as feminazism) came about, one of the first things that they did was invent an idea that there was a mass conspiracy to keep women oppressed and men in power. "The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." Declaration of Sentiments - 1848. The conspiracy that men ruled over women, and oppressed women to advantage m…
/r/MensRights17/05/26 01:24 PM
54

Why sex? Why not something like eye colour? I'd bet the majority of rapists and murderers all have brown hair and brown eyes. Why aren't they saying brown eyed people are trash? They answer is, because they weren't taught to fear, and thus hate, people based in eye color. They were taught to hate men. I just wish we could get through to them and get them to see what they're doing. It's so fucking obvious to anyone not trapped in their echo chamber.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 09:31 AM
2

Driving tired to the point of impairment is illegal. It's driving impaired. Driving under the influence of drugs, (legal or otherwise) is also illegal if they impair your ability to drive. How is saying she was impaired by having given birth recently a defense and not an admission of guilt? What the actual fuck.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 08:28 PM
1

No. Being a bigot is wrong. Painting half of society with one brush because of the actions of a few is not ok. It's not ok when women do it to men. And it's not ok when men do it to women. Bigotry is wrong, stop excusing it.
/r/MensRights04/05/26 09:21 PM
2

That could be one reason why some guys don't like this post. But it's certainly not my reason for not liking this post. Not being a bigot isn't praise worthy, it's literally the bare minimum.
/r/MensRights04/05/26 08:56 PM
4

Everything you've written looks like some high school kid looking to find the misogynists who will agree with your false statements about men being smarter and better than women. Hating men is bigotry. If you're a reformed bigot, well ok. But how about instead of begging for a pat on the back, for crossing a bar that's burried in the ground, you just grow up and stop pretending not being a bigot is noteworthy.
/r/MensRights04/05/26 08:53 PM
4

I think it's very important to add the following when discussing this with someone who's very likely to have been fully indoctrinated into feminism. When MRA's discuss anti feminism it is not anti women and it is not anti progress and equality for women. Feminism is an ideology that claims to be for gender equality. But that is a false claim. MRAs are not against equality, we're against feminism because we don't think it is possible to reach equality within feminist ideology. I would be happy to…
/r/MensRights02/05/26 02:09 AM
9

Then why are you here? Isn't there enough material demonizing men already? Why would you set out to further dehumanize us?
/r/MensRights01/05/26 11:51 PM
7

Who are the main online figures, influencers, podcasts, or channels you follow? I haven't seen any that are sane in a long time. Karen Straugn was by far my favorite when she was putting out new material. Do terms like “red pill,” “manosphere,” “men’s rights,” or “traditional masculinity” feel accurate to you? Why or why not? Red pill used to be used for the men's rights movement, but the old subreddit for pick up artists co-opted it and ruined it. Men's rights is good. I hate the negative conno…
/r/MensRights01/05/26 11:13 PM
50

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment Here's one of my favorites. It's a great read and it's a meta study from an expert in the field.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 08:30 PM
3

I love it that one talked about being part of 4th wave feminism and yet she doesn't recognize the nihilism and bleak outlook that women have who are just a few years younger than her. Honey, I'd bet dollars to donuts you were online posting shit about how scary and dangerous men are if not still doing it.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 09:59 AM
2

ELI5?
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/26 09:11 PM
10

Women have always received more empathy than men. Feminists capitalized on that and increased it, but they didn't create it. Men have much steeper and longer hill to climb in creating that empathy from nothing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 07:57 PM
15

I mean, the answer to your question is actually very easy. Cognitive dissonance. For centuries society has fed people the line that men have it better than women. Couple that with the way society sees men as hyperagents and women as hypoagents and you get a society that believes men either don't have problems, or if they do those problems are of their own making. And women do have problems, and because men control all, men are responsible for women's problems. So, for society to acknowledge men'…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 07:47 PM
4

Here's my take. If men are biologically the best of the best and should be drafted in times of need to fulfill their gender roles to go to war, then women should be drafted to keep up the population of men as that is their gender role and they are the best at it. Women would be abducted away from their loved ones, their children, their families, their careers, everything they've ever known. They would then be placed in birthing units. They'd be put through a rigorous basic training to make sure …
/r/MensRights15/04/26 07:31 PM
4

And when they try to claim 200 studies isn't enough, send them this link. https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/ "The world's largest domestic violence research data base, 5,000+ pages, including more than 4,000 peer-reviewed studies."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 08:53 AM
13

Yes, there is a rather large campaign of support for murdered and missing indigenous women and girls.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 09:56 AM
11

Well the people advocating for indigenous women are themselves indigenous women, because truthfully no one else is fighting for them.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 09:52 AM
14

That is not true at all.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 09:47 AM
3

Nice. You've got a whole bale of strawmen arguments in that post. Well done.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 01:06 AM
49

So, would you be ok with men organizing a men's rights group to march and protest for issues like this? Let's call it a men's rights advocacy group.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/26 10:15 AM
-4

one of the primary roles of third spaces was to meet others for dating No they aren't. Where are you getting this definition? What I've come to realize however is that it's exhausting and between work, the gym (staying on my physical health), upkeep of my home, being there for my parents, saving money, and just the daily life activities of being an adult in 2026, I barely have energy to show up consitently to be able to build that friendship. Exactly. Men don't have the time, money, and energy t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 05:31 PM
2

Alright, cool. The MLE is still about men being lonely due to social isolation
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 04:56 PM
0

Ok, so all of that proves my point that the male loneliness epidemic is about men losing third spaces. There are a host of reasons, I mentioned the main one, but you're right that the take over of male spaces by feminists is also a part of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 03:18 PM
1

What I'm on about is stopping this continually trend of twisting every men's issue to be about women no matter how separated it is from women. The male loneliness epidemic is about men not being able to maintain friendships and relationships due to lack of third spaces. That's what it is. It's not about dating. Men dating is a separate issue, stop conflating them, you're just giving feminists ammo to use against us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 02:58 PM
4

Why do you think male third spaces don’t exist? Because men don't have the time, money, and energy to participate in them anymore. It's not women causing this, it's unchecked capitalism draining men of every second, cent, and ounce of energy they have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 02:54 PM
26

The idea of male privilege is so easy to debunk. Get them to compare white people and people of colour, then get them to compare men and women in the same metrics. The only way they can pretend to see men as privileged is because they gatekeep the conversation to a very small number of metrics that don't have any effect on average men or women.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 10:36 AM
67

Can we please stop allowing feminists to make everything about women. The male loneliness epidemic has nothing, or at least exceedingly little, to do with dating. The male loneliness epidemic is about men losing third spaces and friendships.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 09:10 AM
20

I hate the sexism and misogony of the manosphere but I absolutely want to protect vulnerable men because they are my fellow human beings in dire need. The manosphere is too abstract and doesn't have nearly enough definition to make a claim it is sexist and misogynistic. Many MRAs/equalitarians are not sexist or misogynistic. We want equality. We don't think feminism is the way to get it, but that does not mean we're against women having equal rights/opportunities/responsibilities. The problem th…
/r/MensRights07/04/26 07:51 PM
-1

The outcomes matter vastly more than the conjecture. The republicans are actively destroying the American economy and getting rich in the process. In a sake world I wouldn't vote for democrats because there would be a viable option. This isn't a sane world, and the option isn't viable.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 02:12 PM
19

Almost invariably those misandrists have been inundated with the message that it's a man's world. They've seen repeated statistics about the numbers of male and female CEOs, politicians, and the rich. From that they conclude that men run the world for men and any women who make it to those positions got there against the wishes of men. The counter to this is fairly simple. Ask them if they think white people are privileged over PoC in their country, and if so, what metrics prove that. Then ask t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/26 10:41 AM
8

Exactly. For many seeing those comments is just normal every day life and they don't think about it. When you show how bigoted those comments are it, those reading the exchange might stop to think and learn.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 11:03 AM
3

How did you come to that conclusion?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 11:00 AM
12

Erin Pizzey started the first domestic violence shelter. It was in the UK and it was only for women. Huge kudos to her for starting such a needed program. Through her own observations and research she realized the women she was taking in were often just as violent to her husbands and kids as their husbands were. So she tried to expand the program to serve men as well. She ended up fleeing the UK after getting death threats to her and her family from feminists who didn't like the idea of recogniz…
/r/MensRights27/03/26 11:48 PM
13

What? You don't dream about your first sexual encounter with someone twice your age? Clearly you're not a real man. /s
/r/MensRights27/03/26 11:38 PM
1

So how is Jesus portrayed in the churches near you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/26 01:56 PM
7

Because otherwise they'd just be making another "The Red Pill Documentary" and they wouldn't get the money this film will make them.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 01:12 AM
1

So, what you're saying is words have power and we should choose words that mean what we want them to mean? Things like journeyperson instead of journeyman, or fire fighter instead of fireman?
/r/MensRights17/03/26 10:38 AM
9

This, exactly. It has nothing to do with romantic relationships and everything to do with men being isolated. Terminally online women couldn't fathom that not being about them. 🙄
/r/EverydayMisandry02/03/26 11:51 AM
0

The majority of the users are center.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/26 12:20 PM
4

1) /r/Canada (where you took those screenshots) is center. The left wing sub would be /r/onguardforthee, which was formed because they view /r/canada as too right wing. 2) Every comment in that thread is supporting men. Many doubt the system, but they're supporting men and hoping this program works. So, I must ask, what's the point of your post? There was no misandry in the comment thread.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/26 10:41 AM
3

what do I have to do with any of this? Men set beauty standards and all other societal expectations by ruling over media such as movies. Women are demure and essentially objects who wouldn't possibly make a decision for themselves. So it's men who cause women to find tall men with babies attractive. And all men are complicit in this. Don't you see, it's always men's fault. /S
/r/MensRights22/02/26 12:47 PM
10

Unmarried women have out earned unmarried men in American cities for close to two decades now. And not by insignificant amounts. This is largely driven by pro female hiring practices that are meant to right historical wrongs and by the greater numbers of women earning degrees. It's not until, as you noted, couples have children that men start to out earn women. To say that's caused by sexist stereotypes against women is ridiculous. 1) Women have the greater number of choices. Those being to work…
/r/MensRights22/02/26 09:03 AM
30

The CDC's reports on sexual violence, when including the numbers for made to penetrate, showed even rates of men and women being raped and being rapists. Of course they obfuscated those numbers as best they could and then changed their study practices to further obfuscate them afterwards.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/02/26 11:26 AM
-5

You said "they need push back" and I just wasn't sure what you meant. It could have been just as simple as that, but it could have been saying that the way to push back against them was by voting republican. Glad to see it wasn't voting for trump.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/26 11:24 AM
-9

Are you saying that as a justification for voting for trump?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/26 02:08 AM
1

I never understood the idea that LPS would put the burden on the state. We shouldn't be supporting women choosing to have children they can't afford. If my wife and I can't feed and clothe our kids we'd lose the kids due to neglect. Why would a single mother be immune to those charges? Especially when she made the decision to have the child at a time when the zygote was still viable for abortion? In all reality it comes from the sexist idea that women aren't capable and men are. Ie. women aren't…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/26 11:29 AM
2

I'd make the time frame for men begin when the woman informs him about the pregnancy, and have it only last 4-5 weeks. That gives women plenty of time to realize they're pregnant if they weren't expecting it. And it prevents women withholding the information as a loophole. But otherwise, legal paternal surrender is essential to an egalitarian society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/26 11:13 PM
1

It walls be interesting to learn about safe havens Is that a typo?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/26 11:11 PM
1

The opposite of woke is bigoted. Trump is bigoted because he's tried to take away women's rights, and succeeded in 10 states.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 08:28 PM
1

How could I delete your comment? Jfc, get help dude.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 07:49 PM
1

Hey - tell us all how that word WOKE is somehow NOT a dog whistle for Democrats. It's a dog whistle for republicans. It's republicans who lose their mind over the word woke. You, for example. Do your BEST to make WOKE sound as good as it can be ... with actual EXAMPLES. Lmao, you're really upset about this word aren't you? Do you have nightmares about being chased by a giant "WOKE"? Woke just means do unto others as you would have them do unto you. That's it. It's just a more succinct way to say…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 06:56 PM
12

There are many male feminists and many women who aren't feminists. Criticizing feminism is not criticizing women. But you're right that women aren't above criticism and aren't flawless. It's just that women and feminism aren't the same thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 10:31 PM
31

I blocked a kick aimed at my nuts with my shinone time. She screamed and limped around for a while trying to claim I was the bad guy. 🙄
/r/MensRights06/01/26 02:52 AM
7

The Narcissist Prayer “That didn’t happen.” “And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.” “And if it was, that’s not a big deal.” “And if it is, that’s not my fault.” “And if it was, I didn’t mean it.” “And if I did, you deserved it.”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 07:02 PM
1

The link doesn't go to a pod cast. Again, educate yourself before you continue talking out of your ass.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 01:38 AM
1

it’s about not putting yourself in that situation to begin with. Your belief that men always have the choice is wrong. That's what my link proves. But enjoy your ignorance.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 12:31 AM
1

No. Many guys want to have kids but want to wait until they're in a position to do it properly. Vasectomy is only a solution once you've decided you'll never want more kids.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 04:53 PM
1

I’m a lot more concerned about a woman aborting my child while I have no say. Why? Aren't men who are being exploited a concern to you? And what do you suggest we do to "fix" women aborting your child while you have no say? Either way, we have the ability to make choices that prevent us from being in these situations. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support You should educate yourself.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 04:50 PM
15

It's not liberal vs conservative, it's an attitude towards men that's existed for centuries. It's simply a society thing. Society needed to be forced into accepting women stepping outside of their traditional gender roles, but we've never had that push for men. When it comes to men stepping outside of their traditional gender roles liberals are just as backwards as conservatives. They want men working to provide for the family and if they're not, they're deadbeats and contemptible. I said that t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/25 02:40 PM
10

I'm a 33 year old Muslim and i never got made to feel guilty or told to leave anywhere for being a Muslim, never got threated like a dangerous animal. And I'm out a lot at air ports. Not sure where you guys get into these kind of situations or if that might be a country specific phenomena. Do you think that would've be ok to post in a discussion between Muslim people tired of being suspected of being terrorists after 9/11? What is so hard about a certain degree of decency to make other humans fe…
/r/MensRights23/12/25 03:45 AM
1

Why? Biology creates the different standard. OK, so women shouldn't be in combat roles, shouldn't be allowed to be firefighters, etc.? Biology creates a different standard, right? Restricting women's rights regarding healthcare isn't how you should be approaching the topic. I didn't advocate for restricting women's health care, I showed that we shouldn't restrict men's rights and if we are, we should also restrict women's. Abject poverty? I said this in the reply. So your take is that women aren…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 11:32 PM
1

But that's less about men and more about the child at least from what I can tell for the most part. If forcing men to be parents is better for the child then abortion should also be illegal. So should safe haven sites, emergency contraceptives, and adoption. Pick one standard for men and women and stick with it. You simply don't punish the child for the decisions of the parents. Why would it be a punishment for the child to not be raised by a father who wasn't ready, or didn't want them? In a pe…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 09:00 PM
1

The tradcons in my state are pushing for paternity testing which is hardly anti men. Agreed, that's a good thing. Also nobody is seriously pushing religion in schools legislatively even if they talk it, Yes, they are. The freedom from religious foundation has been very busy lately. and trans folks have the same rights as me so not seeing any big deal with that. When trad cons are actively trying to change that, it is a big deal. Progressives do not want me to live as I see fit, they want me to l…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 08:44 PM
1

Ask even the most progressive feminist if men should have the ability to choose not to be a father post conception? I guarantee they say no. They want women to have that choice, but not men. Almost invariably they say the child is entitled to the fathers financial support.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 08:32 PM
1

Everyone pushes their point of view. You may not like the tradcon point of view but they are not trying to create laws like the democrats to force their point of view. Anti abortion laws, pushes for anti trans laws, bringing religion back to public schools, etc. etc. would like a word or two. The goals of progressives is to let people live however they want and not be subjected to persecution for it. The goal of conservatives is to control other people's lives to try to make everyone like them. …
/r/MensRights22/12/25 05:13 PM
1

Exactly that. Trad cons and feminists have very similar goals for men, keep them working and give them as little choice in their lives as possible.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 05:07 PM
2

I agree with you.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/25 11:12 PM
2

Dude, I'm not the person you were responding to above. I've been supporting you throughout this thread. The definition I shared centers men. Men who cum that fast aren't getting the satisfaction they need from sex. It has nothing to do with women's satisfaction as that can come from multiple methods. I doubt I'll ever be okay with it until women are considered to have "delayed ejaculation" for their natural difficulties orgasming. From the link and what I was hoping you'd see: "Female Sexual Int…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/25 11:11 PM
2

https://www.veterans.gc.ca/en/mental-and-physical-health/mental-health-and-wellness/compensation-illness-or-injury/disability-benefits/entitlement-eligibility-guidelines/az-index/sexual-dysfunction There is recognition for female sexual disfunction. It might not exist in public discourse, but there is clinical definitions, research, discussions, treatments, etc. There's also a definition of premature ejaculation that doesn't center women. "Premature (Early) Ejaculation means persistent or recurr…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/25 10:50 PM
2

Correcting vocabulary you didn’t understand doesn’t make your position stronger. If you want to debate definitions, do it honestly. If not, stop pretending semantics are the answer. I did it honestly. And correctly. You're trying to claim oppression when that's not what's happening at all. Oppression is what was done to slaves. Women have never been oppressed. Calling every disagreement a “confession” is just a lazy dodge. Lmao, once again you don't understand the words being used. Should I lowe…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/25 10:36 PM
3

No one said women aren’t responsible for their own pleasure. Is the orgasm gap caused by men not knowing enough about women's bodies or did you not say men are responsible for women's orgasms? It's one or the other. Claiming men understand female sexuality just fine is contradicted by reality. If they did, the orgasm gap wouldn’t exist. Oh, wow, there it is again. Being asked not to center sex entirely on male ejaculation isn’t oppression. Your argument is just false symmetry and defensiveness. …
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/25 06:40 PM
3

Why are men responsible for their own satisfaction and responsible for their partner's satisfaction, but women aren't even responsible their own? Why aren't women to blame if women can't enjoy sex if men are to blame if men can't enjoy sex? Also, your cop out that "Many men don’t understand female anatomy and physiology" is the worst cope in history. Men do understand women just fine, a similar amount to what women understand of men. Women just listen to bull shit like you wrote and learn that t…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/25 03:49 PM
5

mental fatigue of always having to be on My wife and I did week on week off night time feedings to make sure we could catch up on sleep. Aside from that being a stay at home parent was easy for both of us. I have no idea what "always having to be on" means here. They're kids, beyond two they spend plenty of time playing solo, co playing with a sibling or friend, or playing with their sibling or friend. When they're young there's also nap time. If this level of 'being switched on" is too much the…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 03:24 PM
1

I spent three months as a stay at home parent when my kids young. One was 9 months when I started, the other two and a half. I did everything, cooking, cleaning, laundry, budgeting, shopping, I took them at least three times a week to social activities like parks or indoor playgrounds. I was so bored I bought a used car and rebuilt it to sell. I'm now a stay at home parent again as I've medically released from the military and I'm unable to work. My kids are both in high school. Again, I'm doing…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 03:17 PM
9

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment Read the second part of that study. It's astonishing how much effort goes into hiding the reality. Here's a second meta study to back up the first in case 200 studies all showing parity isn't enough evidence. This one has 1700. https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/25 03:01 PM
-7

Yup, it's not different than republicans using antifa as an insult or to mean a terrorist group. Being anti fascist isn't an insult nor is it a bad thing. But they've lost understanding of what the word means. Feminists seem to believe incel means misogynist and don't understand what it actually means. What's funny is if you point out the anti male aspects of "toxic masculinity" they'll defend the term as an academic term. But with incel they claim innocence.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 08:30 PM
1

I meant "It makes me wonder why misogyny is being called out consistently" Thank for noticing so I could correct it.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 10:38 AM
13

It's just the latest move to keep the money flowing to the feminist movement by framing men as bad and violent. They don't care about stopping the harm to women and girls, if they did they'd be opening men's domestic violence shelters and support systems. Prior to the 70s wen killed their husbands almost as often as men killed their wives. That changed at the same time that women's domestic violence shelters started opening. We have decades of research showing domes violence happens at the same …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/25 05:12 PM
9

It makes me wonder why misogyny is being called out consistently (ie. The UK saying they're going to make anti misogyny a school initiative) but misandry isn't called out at all.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 01:52 PM
18

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment Start on page "339".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 10:37 PM
29

Feminists have lobbied against equal shared parenting, for men having curfews, against women going to prison, against men's shelters, against men's support groups, against men having equal bodily autonomy, against men having equal parental rights, against men having equal access to education... It might not pass the power level required to call it oppression, but feminism is certainly against men and men having equal rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 04:03 PM
6

Novel, isn't it. Yet the information is decades old. This is one of the biggest reasons I'm anti feminist. By controlling and gatekeeping the conversation to exclude male victims and female perpetrators feminists are causing countless men and children to stay in abusive relationships and homes, countless men to be forced into fatherhood and countless children to be raised by fathers who weren't ready and/or willing. And they're causing the deaths of many women by way of men acting in desperation…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/25 01:30 AM
16

Men and women used to kill their spouses at even rates. That changed in the 70s when the rates of women killing their spouses started dropping much faster. Do you know what also happened in the 70s? Women's domestic violence shelters started opening. We also have hundreds of studies that show men and women abuse each other at similar rates and for similar reasons. If you want to reduce the number of men killing women, it's not that hard of a concept, give men more domestic violence support. Help…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 10:50 AM
6

https://nypost.com/2018/10/04/academic-journal-accepts-feminist-mein-kampf/ Yeah, I'm not surprised.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/25 05:59 PM
2

And the reality is the way he's being assumed responsible, and the way a woman would be assumed not responsible, are both wrong. In both instances people should investigate, but remain neutral until sufficient evidence either way is available. It's the classic hyperagency for men and hypoagency for women.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 05:14 PM
6

Hypothermia could easily account for all of that. People get stupid in a hurry when their core temperature falls even a little. The point is, we don't know enough about his knowledge level and what state he was in when he was found to make any judgement.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 05:12 PM
1

Did he have enough training to pull off a trip like that? Or was he only slightly more experienced than her and almost died himself? There's a difference between negligence, which is knowing and not acting, and not knowing.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 05:08 PM
4

It could also just be gross stupidity. He was more experienced than her, but what does that mean? Was he a trained and certified mountaineering guide? Or an idiot who watched a couple of videos and thought that was sufficient? Or somewhere in between? From here we don't know. I do know that hypothermia could easily explain most of that list, and the rest could easily be explained by over confidence and a lack of knowledge.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 05:04 PM
5

I honestly have no idea. Bots? Maybe feminists?
/r/MensRights01/12/25 06:44 PM
28

Same. I'm left leaning because I agree with the core tenets, equal opportunity, fair wages, safe work places, etc. But there are a fuck ton of people who claim to be left leaning that do not in anyway believe in those core tenets and are in fact extremely hypocritical.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 10:00 PM
5

Call them out. These people invariably identify as left wing, so use left wing phrases and reasoning. Call the bigots. Call them supremacists. Call them radicalized. Tell them to leave their echo chamber. Tell them to touch grass. Tell them to talk to men in real life. It's all true. Those people are no less radicalized than men who hate women.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/25 11:44 PM
2

First feminists and now here as well??? The male loneliness epidemic is about lost friendships, lost third spaces to develop and maintain friendships, and lost disposable income to attend events with friends. Being an incel or having a hard time finding a romantic relationship sucks, and is related, but it's not the most important part of the male loneliness epidemic.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 05:22 PM
13

Do you know when men got the right to vote in your country?
/r/MensRights22/11/25 02:19 AM
1

Yes, I said that.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 02:08 PM
1

Plenty of women pay their fair share, and that is actually improving. You're right about the system being set up to allow women to avoid accountability, but that's a problem with the system, not women. Just as many women take advantage of their privilege as men would if it was available to us. Don't blame women, blame a society (men and women) who refuse to force women to be accountable when they are able and refuse to give men grace when they are not able.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 10:42 AM
13

https://stayathomemum.com.au/news-opinion/true-crime/10-real-stories-of-babies-switched-at-birth/ When a mother is forced to raise someone else's child it's treated as the betrayal that it is. When men are forced to raise someone else's child people tell them they should be happy to be a parent no matter whose child it is.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 12:59 AM
20

This fucking drives me insane. Why would someone else need to pay? Why are women incapable of being accountable for their own decisions? I know what you're saying is correct, but it shouldn't be. I have absolutely nothing against single mothers who can afford to be a single mother. But I do have a problem with people choosing to put themselves and their children in harms way of being poor and homeless because they think they can extort someone else to pay for it. Women have every opportunity pos…
/r/MensRights16/11/25 12:51 AM
7

That's as short sighted as saying homosexuality isn't inherent. Just because you are not masculine doesn't mean other men aren't inherently masculine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 08:42 PM
10

Yup. And in keeping with that there's vastly less research into the affects of such violence vs physical violence, especially in domestic violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 07:10 PM
10

There's nothing wrong with that as it's stated. But your other comment claiming masculinity is inherently toxic shows you don't understand the difference between a chosen action and an immutable characteristic. Trying to force men to not be masculine is analogous to conversion therapy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 07:06 PM
11

No, it isn't. But your bigotry is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 07:03 PM
29

isn't that what microagressions are? That's exactly what they're doing. Yet they choose to ignore the consequences of their language choices and the damage it does over time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 05:26 PM
15

1) Why is a penis the defining characteristic of these people who all don't like you? Why not hair color, or being left vs right handed? Or any other random and meaningless characteristics? 2) When I'm having a bad time and thinking everyone doesn't like me, it's because I'm having a bad day and I'm cranky. If "most men don't like [you] by default" you should probably look inwards. If that large of a group all thinks you're not likeable, chances are you're not likeable or you're doing something …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 05:24 PM
34

1) Women use figures of authority (police, the justice system, HR, politicians, etc.) to bully and harm men frequently. Just because they use a proxy doesn't make them any less culpable for the harm they cause. 2) Stop talking about the perpetrators in an effort to silence the victims. You're only doing exactly what the OOP is saying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 05:00 PM
31

https://brenebrown.com/articles/2018/05/17/dehumanizing-always-starts-with-language/ This is a great article on dehumanization. It's one of the many tactics feminists use against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/25 04:54 PM
24

Here's another example. https://www.cbc.ca/radio/unreserved/tradition-authenticity-and-the-fight-for-indigenous-identity-1.3281731/are-we-ignoring-missing-and-murdered-indigenous-men-1.3284322 Canadian indigenous men make up 71% of those murdered yet there's outcry only for "murdered and missing women and girls.". That 29% deserves to be recognized for their suffering. But so does the other 71%.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 01:31 PM
2

Good question. Where is it?
/r/MensRights08/11/25 01:49 PM
-1

Trump got the surviving hostages, all men, out of Hamas captivity after 2 years. He wasn't even sworn in. Lmao Kamala put men, mostly black men, in jail for minor drug offences and kept them in jail to use them for prison labor. Trump has threatened how many countries? And on a larger scale, two months ago a deranged leftist murdered an innocent man in front of his wife and children, and other leftists celebrated it. What does tyag have to do with this discussion? Do you think no rightist has ev…
/r/MensRights08/11/25 02:59 AM
-3

Kackling Who gives a shit if you don't like her laugh Kommunist You clearly have no idea what that even means. Misandrist As if trump gave two shits about you either. Is that all you used to compare them? An incorrect definition of a word you don't like, a laugh you don't like, and they both don't like the same group of people that have been disliked and discriminated against for centuries. You didn't even consider things like the economy, workers rights, healthcare, inflation, deportations, tar…
/r/MensRights07/11/25 09:23 PM
-7

He's absolutely not the best of the available options. Harris would have been vastly better than trump. Out of a bad and a worst option, you choose the worst. No, the democrats don't understand, but neither do you. Thinking trump is in any way suitable or better makes me wonder if you used an iron to get the last of the wrinkles out of your brain.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 07:00 PM
7

Yes they would. What do you think the last ~200 years of feminism has been about?
/r/MensRights07/11/25 11:31 AM
1

In what ways do conservatives demonstrate that they care about men's rights?
/r/MensRights07/11/25 11:29 AM
3

Both can be true. The democrats have turned to shit because they kowtow to billionaires. The republicans are shit because many of them are billionaires. The orange man isn't just bad, he's absolutely fucking terrible. I understand not wanting to vote for most democrats, but wanting to vote for trump is even more insane.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 11:23 AM
19

If, as fully able person, clearly communicating your needs and wants is too much emotional labour maybe you don't deserve the other person in your life. We aren't mind readers. We can get lucky sometimes by making assumptions based on body language and such, but that's only luck. People on the spectrum have an even harder time at reading body language successfully. Acting like people should be able to read your mind to understand your thoughts is childish. Basically, use your words like a big gi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 01:38 PM
13

Just a bit of a tangent, I hate the phrase "primary care giver". "Who's your child's primary care giver, your wife and yourself?" Neither. We both equally care for the kids. The fact that one needs to do that primarily through providing for them from some distance and the other does it primarily through interacting with them directly does not in any way mean one parent cares more than the other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 11:06 AM
-1

Your response is hilarious. You're using the idea that "well, they might be getting more opportunities for a successful and fulfilling life, but at least the degrees they're choosing don't fit what I expect a successful and fulfilling life to include so it doesn't matter to me" as copium.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/11/25 10:20 AM
3

Then you'd get hit with the foreign student fees. Better to self identify as pre op trans woman, lesbian, African Canadian.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 09:47 PM
4

Exactly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 05:49 PM
8

So? All squares are rectangles, not all rectangles are squares. Even if all people who have been radicalized have mental health issues that doesn't mean all people with mental health issues are radicalized. What you're saying is the type of bull shit that radicalized feminists use to justify misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 05:32 PM
23

Those posters have been radicalized. Being neurodivergent and not leaving the house have little to do with it. One of those is an immutable characteristic and the other isn't an indication of anything. Just say they've been radicalized by online hate groups. It's no different than any other type of radicalization other than the fact that radical feminism isnt frowned upon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 10:31 AM
20

Or they negatively compare you to other men. You're just like your father, or so and so would have done better. It all falls under the same umbrella of manipulation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 10:24 AM
5

Jfc that's infuriating to read. The laws are blatantly sexist and discriminatory yet they stick their heads in the sand and hide behind their motte and bailey so they don't have to confront their cognitive dissonance. It never cesses to amaze me how people can be so apathetic to men when all we're asking for is the same treatment and rights women receive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 02:19 AM
8

The problem is, what's been explained to you and what you're parroting, is a fallacy. The legal system was not set up to protect children, it was set up to protect women. That is why women have all of the choices and all of the decision making power, with only as much responsibility as the woman's choices to accept. The idea that these laws were set up to protect children is laughable. Is it protecting children when women abort? Is it protecting children when women leave babies at safe haven sit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 08:25 PM
10

Yup, I've been saying the same for years now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 01:28 PM
23

the simple reality that the child is the one whose rights are being protected over the man. Not the woman's. So to fix this, it isn't a man vs woman thing, it's about what you then do to ensure the child has a healthy childhood with robust financial support. This is such a cop out. And it's utter crap. 1) It's an ad hoc argument. If we follow your logic then abortion is murder, and safe haven sites are abandonment. LPS would happen before a child is born, just like abortion. If you want to consi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 01:27 PM
10

but in reality a social norm has changed and women won’t admit that (probably because it hasn’t changed for everyone). I agree with everything until what's in the parenthesis. Feminists refuse to admit it changed because that would demonstrate they have the power to influence social norms. If they admit to having that power their whole dogma of powerlessness would crumble. Remember, women's greatest strength is their facade of weakness, and men's greatest weakness is their facade of strength.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/25 02:00 PM
0

Why bring this up? It was one ass hole, it's well known to anyone in this community that it happened. He was fired IIRC. That is not the normal experience vets have when they contact VAC.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/25 10:03 PM
4

I got what you were saying. I wasn't offended. I just wanted to answer your rhetorical question because there was more to the story. But your original point stands and doesn't need to be removed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/25 06:08 PM
23

Lazy dead beats. How dare they die.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/25 05:03 PM
10

I'm a vet with PTSD, my family gets coverage for mental health from veterans affairs Canada. Not that I support the idea that my family had it worse than I did. I'm just adding that some countries do take that toll seriously as it is a toll and a potential source of trauma.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/25 05:02 PM
5

You should read some history and see how free women were when they were forced to have children against their will, What was forcing them to have children against their will? Was it the legal system? Or medical technology? Or both? Something else? they were dying giving birth This was due to medical technology. Before modern medicine women died in child birth at about the same rate that men died in combat. That wasn't about hating or oppressing women, it was a lack of knowledge and technology. a…
/r/MensRights08/10/25 11:32 AM
2

PMC Frontlines has some good ideas, like organizing this protest which I applaude them for. But they are extremely hard lined about labels. I disagree with many of their stances. For example, I think it's useless to call you a member of a hate movement. The only thing it's going to do is put you on the defensive and make you turn away from this group. He is correct that feminism isn't about equality and never was. Feminism has always been about women and the idea that women need to be brought up…
/r/MensRights08/10/25 11:20 AM
2

I don't see measuring outcomes and comparing men to women based on those outcomes as an ad hoc argument at all. If anything, staying the sex of those in office or who could vote is the ad hoc. Or, as I said, a motte and bailey. In any other comparison of two groups of people the metrics used are outcomes. Are black people worse off in America than white people? Well, let's examine things like poverty and homelessness, life span, discretionary spending, victimization from crime rates, victimizati…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/25 12:04 PM
2

Women got prohibition passed well before they had any "representation" in government. I think the argument about the sex of those holding government offices is a motte and bailey. The measured outcome is what we should be focused on, and as you said, women and men had more or less the same quality of life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 07:44 PM
2

Agreed! And it's debatable if they were oppressed in the past. Clearly compared to today they were doing much worse. But compared to men of the same time frame I'd say both men and women were equally repressed, but men weren't oppressing women in the past.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 06:15 PM
5

Equality, not accountability, but I get the gist and agree. Privilege is by definition invisible to the holder and yet these types of people who talk about privilege refuse any and all attempts to make their privilege known to them. Their hypocrisy is mind blowing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 05:29 PM
30

Because misandry is so common and supported that misandrists often have never been questioned on their bigotry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 03:11 AM
8

If you haven't, please watch her documentary. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7MkSpJk5tM
/r/MensRights27/09/25 11:09 AM
11

I find it fucking shocking that feminists have been using that rhetoric for decades. MRAs have been pointing out how damaging it is, but the vast majority didn't believe us. Now, right wing politics is doing the same and making good on their promises to 'round up the brown people who are stealing everyone's jobs' and everyone on the left - my own political side - is acting shocked like they have no idea how this could possibly happen.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 09:22 PM
0

That's fair, to a point. Feminism is very diverse. But which people labeling themselves as feminist are the ones with lobbying power, and are influencing people? Many of them are the aforementioned radical feminists. And who gets excommunicated from the feminist movement? The ones that try to stand up for men as well. I'm sorry if this offends you, but I judge the feminist movement on the actions of its leaders/the most influential. The national organization for women lobbied against equal share…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 03:22 AM
0

So what specifically don't you agree with in my comments here?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 02:19 AM
1

Btw, if the basis of a conclusion is wrong, then the conclusion is wrong. Everything he's saying starts from the basis that women hate men. Which is not true. Therefore, everything he's saying is wrong. There might be bits and pieces that happen to be accurate but combining those tiny bits and pieces with other false information does not lead to a correction conclusion. All he's doing is radicalizing people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 01:36 AM
0

Did you reply to the wrong comment?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 01:28 AM
3

Also, using "woke" the way you are is an incredibly obvious right wing dog whistle. If anything, why are you in this subreddit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/25 09:38 PM
3

That really depends on your definition of "woke" which is nebulous at best. To me woke just means socially aware, which should include being aware of the suffering men go through.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/25 06:12 PM
2

As I said above "Framing women as an enemy has no place here or in the men's rights movement."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 06:58 PM
0

And Wikipedia defines it as "Woke is an adjective derived from African-American English used since the 1930s or earlier to refer to awareness of racial prejudice and discrimination, often in the construction stay woke. The term acquired political connotations by the 1970s and gained further popularity in the 2010s with the hashtag #staywoke. Over time, woke came to be used to refer to a broader awareness of social inequalities such as sexism and denial of LGBTQ rights. Woke has also been used as…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 03:35 PM
1

What's wrong with woke?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 03:25 PM
5

I've already answered that. Yes, he is wrong. No, he is not right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 03:23 PM
5

No, he's not. Framing women as an enemy has no place here or in the men's rights movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 02:17 AM
65

I got a few minutes into the linked video, and a few minutes into his video on Norah Vincent. That's enough for me. How many times is he going to say things like 'women have always hated men'. Which is an outright lie. Women aren't the enemy that this guy is trying to convince you they are. Feminism is an enemy of men, but by no means is feminism the only or even main enemy of men's equality. The main enemy is society's blind spot for men's suffering and women's privileges. Feminism works by cap…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/25 09:34 PM
8

Yeah, old people, people with toddlers/infants, a pregnant woman, someone with a disability... I'll give my seat up for someone that needs it. But just being a woman does not qualify as needing it.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 10:35 PM
2

That's probably the majority of it.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 10:31 PM
1

You cannot be mad at the society men created for treating men as superior to women. This is such a fucking cop-out. It's also hugely misogynistic. Women are just as responsible for society as men are.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 10:22 PM
1

But my entire point is that this sub is supposed to be abt men’s rights, but I just see it as an outlet for spewing hatred a lot of the time, despite agreeing with some of it. Like back to OPs question it was abt if we’d survive in an apocalyptic situation basically, but if you read the comments & try to put yourself in a woman’s shoes, you can see how it comes of as kinda fucked up but more importantly just hatred. A lot of these threads aren’t like that but this one is. One more time for the k…
/r/MensRights01/09/25 10:19 PM
2

What does emotional intelligence have to do with any of this? Honestly, the fact that the most crucial aspect of this you can think of being emotional intelligence is pretty telling. Do you have any idea what's involved in running a power grid with various power stations? How about an oil refinery? I sure don't. But I can tell you it took about 6 years of training and experience to get my boiler operator certification in the Canadian Navy. (Similar to a civilian 3rd class power engineer.) And th…
/r/MensRights01/09/25 07:02 PM
1

Modern left isn't that full of identity politics. You're right that there's too much of it, but I'd still rather vote left than right.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 06:43 PM
2

Ok, what's a male nationalist?
/r/MensRights23/08/25 03:08 PM
1

Then why did you post that?
/r/MensRights23/08/25 02:02 PM
-7

When boys and men don't feel at home in, or directly oppressed to, general social gatherings: school, workplace, local communities, mainstream society etc. they tend to dissociate, find an outsider group with mainly other men in it and were they make up their own value systems. The male loneliness epidemic would seem to suggest you have no fucking clue what you're talking about. Women are different. They don't form outsider groups. Yes they do. Statistically women have larger friend groups than …
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:34 PM
0

Just a guess, but they'd probably reject the idea as it's based too heavily on assumptions of both men and women. Plenty of women go against the grain, plenty of men don't.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:17 PM
2

And Christian Nationalists are who you think we should be styling ourselves after?
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:16 PM
4

Voting is cucked? What the actual fuck, dude? And voting left is retarded? Left wing politics has given us literally everything good in society. Without left wing politics we'd still be in a feudal system.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:13 PM
2

It's from a member of a known terrorist group. I'm not sure why this kind of thing is surprising from them.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 07:15 PM
1

Why are you browsing the web without uBlock Origin?
/r/MensRights18/08/25 07:27 PM
1

Right. These entitled idiots will find anything to complain about. I've also seen feminists complain about the lack of medical research on pregnant women. The ethical issues around experimenting on pregnant women, combined with the limited number of pregnant women and even fewer who would be willing to risk birth defects, makes that research next to impossible. Yet feminists still think that represents systemic sexism. 🤦
/r/MensRights12/08/25 09:46 AM
5

Yup. Like almost everything from feminists it relies on a combination of twisted facts, things that aren't actually comparisons but sound like it, and gatekeeping the metrics used in the conversation. It's just a grift.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 05:09 PM
9

Why is "ignoring" the dollars spent ridiculous. Because the vast majority of these diseases are affecting people in their 50s and up. If there was the kind of age disparity you're talking (10 vs. 70) about I'd be inclined to agree, but there isn't. Because the dollars spent per person with a disease is a very important factor to consider when comparing how much is spent per person with a disease. I don't understand what exactly is being debunked here? Are you trying to say that the measure is un…
/r/MensRights09/08/25 08:28 AM
11

/u/hotcaptures
/r/MensRights09/08/25 02:58 AM
4

“Only 10 states are forcing girls to have babies and killing more women! No biggie!” That’s what you sound like. I stated a fact instead of allowing your hyperbole to continue. You're the one that added the "no biggie". Downplaying women dying preventable deaths is crazy. Workplace deaths are preventable, you choose your job. But downplaying men dying preventable deaths isn't crazy? Education attainment isn't some conspiracy against men. They’re choosing not to go. So biases in marking, biases i…
/r/MensRights08/08/25 05:10 PM
1

What about them?
/r/MensRights07/08/25 12:34 PM
8

Let me rephrase then. So you don’t think there are any examples like I’m talking about? No, because lying to a child for years to entice them to love someone who isn't their father, knowing it could all come crumbling down at any moment and the one who will pay the price is the child, is abusive. A parent who would play with and abuse their child's emotions like that doesn't deserve to have children.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 02:57 AM
11

Lying to a child for years to entice them toove someone who isn't their father, knowing it could all come crumbling down at any moment and the one who will pay the price is the child, is abusive. A parent who would play and abuse their child's emotions like that doesn't deserve to have children.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 01:14 AM
6

I think you can. Paternity fraud harms the children too.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 10:42 PM
9

I'd argue a mother who engages in paternity fraud is definitionally a terrible mother and should lose her children.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 10:20 PM
6

The most privileged? Yes, by many metrics. Where have you been? On planet earth. You? 10 year old girls are being forced to have babies, which they will likely die or experience extreme health conditions with. Maternal morality is rising because republicans decided to ban abortion, which kills women AND infants (not fetuses- infants.) 10 of 50 states have bans on abortion. Meaning 80% of states don't have bans on abortion. No states give men the option to not be a parent post intercourse even if…
/r/MensRights06/08/25 10:16 PM
7

Forcing a child on the "real father", who likely didn't consent to being a father in the first place, doesn't seem like the best way forward either.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 08:16 PM
20

A person's sex doesn't determine their politics.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 08:14 PM
19

This is exactly the kind of rights issue the left should be pushing to end. Bravo Mexico
/r/MensRights06/08/25 08:12 PM
2

https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/ Always has been.
/r/MensRights02/08/25 06:12 PM
0

Honestly, I glad it was rejected. I just wish men received the same concern and empathy as women; the tea app and similar platforms should have never existed either.
/r/MensRights02/08/25 05:55 PM
19

This is exactly it. With the loss of third spaces for men there is no opportunity to connect with people. It'd not about dating/sex/women. It's about the fact that we are a social species and men have lost their ability to make and maintain social connections. This isn't caused by feminism either. Some of it is attributable to feminism, but it's mostly about class warfare/wealth inequality/stagnant wages and the fact that now two people need to work to maintain a house which means there's less t…
/r/MensRights02/08/25 05:51 PM
16

That, but un-ironically. Feminists are bombarded with news stories about women being raped, and murdered, and harassed... When you hear statistics like "a woman is killed every two days in Canada" its got to be terrifying. If they said roughly 1 in one hundred thousand woman is killed in Canada every year, of all external causes, it's vastly less terrifying. But they're susceptible to the same kinds of fear mongering and propaganda as everyone else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 08:37 PM
-3

You sound exactly like the uncle Tom's that go on to twox and other places like that and say misandrist bull shit. No, we're better than that. There's plenty of people of both sexes who are abusive, and many more who aren't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 08:25 PM
27

It's a few things. IMO at least. 1) The feminist movement is highly fractured. 2) The influencial feminist, those with the budget and power to lobby government have consistently lobbied for policies that are not aimed at equality but female supremacy. 3) The feminists with an audience need to continue to make money off their audience so they need to continue to find new made up reasons to be angry. All told, they don't have any centralized vision for the future or goals. They're just angry for m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 04:50 PM
64

Feminists believe men are powerful and in control of all that happens to them and around them. From what I've seen they honestly believe misogyny only exists because non-misogynistic men allow it to. All of the talk in the bathroom at the bar about who Todd is going to rape tonight, all of the talk in the locker room at the gym about who Kevin is going to harass at work next week, non-misogynistic listen to it but never speak up. Or that's what feminists think happens. It's baffling the shit the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 02:26 PM
2

Great article, thank you for sharing it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 04:11 PM
6

Ever hear of Legal Paternal Surrender? Legal Paternal Surrender is a proposal that would allow men to opt out of parenthood before the child is born. Men would be given a time frame, say 4 weeks, after they're informed of the pregnancy to file an LPS with whatever authority would be necessary. If they do so it would alleviate the man of all parental rights and responsibilities to that pregnancy. And should allow the woman to make her own decisions about abortion if the fathers decision will impa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 12:21 PM
11

It is a big deal. Yet there's not a country in the world that has any way for men to prevent themselves from being forced into parenthood. Women have several ways to prevent themselves from being forced into parenthood. Taking away abortion is bringing women and men closer to being equal, not farther. If, like me, you believe losing that right is a negative then we should be pointing out that the system as it stands/stood is sexist and should be fixed so everyone has equal rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 03:03 AM
8

No dude, what you're describing is called hypervigilance. It's a symptom of anxiety or PTSD. Mature and responsible people don't spend that much of their time and energy trying to control something they can't control, namely other people's feelings.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 07:31 PM
32

If I'm afraid of gay people, is it their responsibility to make me feel safe? Or is it my responsibility to not be homophobic?
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:02 PM
28

That's a nice phrase, but it's meaningless without context. What is a meaningful contribution to the safety of one's environment?
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:00 PM
8

Everyone has insecurities, it's a natural part of life. The expectation that men are strong and confident, and don't have or display insecurities is toxic gender norms. Calling someone out for toxic behaviour is fine. Calling someone out for being insecure is akin to body shaming.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 10:54 AM
1

We exist. I'm now a full time stay at home father/retired from the military. My wife has another 10 years to go until she can draw her pension as a teacher. She's also given a lot for her career, she's working in her third masters now. She's not making doctor money, but she makes about double the average salary for our area. Add my pension on top of that, and me doing what I can to stretch our money, we're living a pretty good life. With all of that, I'm pretty happy with filling the role of hom…
/r/MensRights28/06/25 12:24 PM
2

Well, then that's your narrow view of things, not mine or many other people's view.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/06/25 08:58 PM
40

Why is being insecure an insult only for men. When a woman is feeling insecure people will try to support her. But when a man is feeling insecure people belittle him. It's absurd that calling men insecure is even an insult to anyone other than the person calling men that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 08:00 PM
3

You can also not have a career and make a worthy contribution to a family.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/06/25 01:27 PM
6

And this is what you think a traditional marriage is? You don't think keeping a home and raising children is contributing?
/r/EverydayMisandry26/06/25 11:35 PM
1

Yup, this is fucking abhorrent.
/r/MensRights19/06/25 03:09 PM
141

If you click the link to the Stanford study one of the headings is "How men’s loneliness affects women". Just, fucking wow. Men are hurting, but that doesn't matter, let's look at how that's affecting women. 🙄
/r/MensRights17/06/25 01:07 PM
1

Askmen isn't as feminist as you're making it out to be. Lots of MRAs over there too.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 10:40 PM
-4

You'll get mostly one type of answer here. But this isn't a good sample size for all men. /r/ask men will have more perspectives, all equally valid.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 08:02 PM
2

Is that all you get out of a relationship with a man? Things get fixed, things get paid for, and he can lift things for you? That's not a relationship, that's just a transaction of sex for money and/or labour. I get a lot of intangibles from my wife, she's my best friend, and my life partner. She's always in my corner and I'm in hers. It's those intangibles that are the reason I'm in a relationship. Just being in the room with her makes my day better.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 07:53 PM
14

https://www.vice.com/en/article/is-reducing-the-male-population-by-90-percent-the-solution-to-all-our-problems/
/r/MensRights04/06/25 11:31 AM
1

https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/
/r/MensRights29/05/25 06:20 PM
1

What issue did I dodge?
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:59 AM
2

Cool. Meanwhile the laws here were made decades ago, thankfully.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 01:54 AM
2

Is that uncertainty supposed to be a good thing? Personally I prefer to not have basic human rights, like health care, not be uncertain. Thankfully I don't live in a third world country.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 10:05 PM
1

Stop using words you don't understand.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 10:00 PM
2

Because allowing a far right wing party to take power is worse.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 04:24 PM
4

That theory didn't work out too well for Americans. Thankfully other countries have learned from their mistake.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 12:49 PM
1

"smaller government" means less regulations and fewer workers rights. Unions and work place safety are inherently a left wing concept.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 12:27 PM
4

The problem with that is also losing workers rights, health care (if you had it to begin with), fair taxes, benefits for those in need, etc. Voting for the party that is trying to end wokism is going to hurt men more than wokism.
/r/MensRights26/05/25 10:26 AM
10

Most? Which ones aren't?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/05/25 11:17 AM
7

Even the definitions these studies use are absurd. Mowing the lawn is often listed as leisure, ffs. No, its just more relaxing than most of the rest of the work most men do, so it ends up being a highlight in their week.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/05/25 01:01 AM
-2

I agree that the left is ignoring men. But that doesn't make the right a better choice. The right is actively hurting everyone. The left is simply ignoring men, but trying to make things better everywhere else. I'd rather vote for that than vote for a party whose main goal seems to be to leave everyone penniless and homeless.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/04/25 09:52 AM
21

The men's sheds movement was a wonderful thing for men. A place to learn and connect with other men. I went to my local one a few times but ultimately found that being about 30 or more years younger than everyone else there made it hard for them and me to connect. Having women there is going to further reduce men's opportunities to connect with and support each other. At what point do we say enough is enough. Build your own fucking thing and stop destroying every chance we have to create friends…
/r/MensRights25/04/25 07:50 PM
1

Ah, I misunderstood your comment. All good. On the topic of benevolent sexism, I've always hated that term. It's just a way to manipulate a situation so that women are always the victim. In this case, if someone would hold the door open for a woman but not for a man, that's not benevolent sexism against women, that's just sexism against men.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 02:04 PM
0

Holding the door for someone in no way suggests anything of that sort. That was an assumption the feminist made, not something OP's actions implied. We cannot predict let alone control another person's thoughts or feelings. The assumption that a man is responsible for a woman's feelings and thoughts though, the assumption that you're making, is toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 01:51 PM
2

I was pushing a double stroller with my toddler and infant through a door one time and wasn't able to hold the door open for anyone behind me. An old woman cursed me out for my "lack of manners" because I didn't hold the door for her. Some people will just find anything to be offended about. It happens. Not often thankfully, but it does.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 01:47 PM
0

Do female feminists have some sort of warning sign? Maybe a hate with a logo to identify them as raging ass holes? Or are we just supposed to assume who's the female feminist and who isn't? 1) I'm not a fan of assuming anyone's gender. 2) There are even less indicators of who is a feminist and who isn't.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 01:44 PM
0

Feminists being so easily offended, that someone holding a door for them sends them into a rage, is the only thing that's pathetic here. Well, and you defending their pointless rage.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 01:42 PM
0

What's the point of not slamming a door in someone's face? Is that really your question?
/r/MensRights21/04/25 01:40 PM
1

And women can't?
/r/MensRights21/04/25 01:38 PM
3

Only if he wouldn't hold the door for a man. As a normal human being I hold the door for anyone behind me. It's not sexism of any sort, it's simply common courtesy.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 01:34 PM
28

Most women have no idea what incel means. They just think it means misogynist. Like right wingers thinking antifa is just the far left and making fun of people who are against fascism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 02:41 PM
2

It's you who's splitting hairs. Populist is a right wing political movement. The left is also fighting in this class war.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 01:32 AM
1

And you're wrong. There would be no culture war without the rich force feeding us a media diet of culture war constantly.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 09:39 AM
4

I see you're missing the point entirely. The class war is the rich vs the poor. What you're talking about is just another in a long list of distractions from the class war.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 10:09 PM
2

And who do you see as "the Establishment"?
/r/MensRights05/04/25 09:33 PM
14

We're all being taught to fear each other. White men are being taught to fear brown immigrants. Brown immigrants are being taught to fear white people. Women are being taught to fear men. Christians are being taught to fear and LGBTQ. Republicans are being taught to fear Democrates. Democrates are being taught to fear Republicans. MRAs are taught to fear feminists. The more we fight with each other the less we can fight the class war that is being waged upon us.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 01:56 PM
5

https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/ https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/ The world's largest domestic violence research data base, 2,657 pages, with summaries of 1700 peer-reviewed studies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/25 03:59 PM
3

The Red Pill Documentary is available on YouTube
/r/MensRights30/03/25 11:01 PM
3

Imagine if the government came out with new work place safety laws that made the workplace safer for white people, but allowed black people to be exposed to emotional trauma, being physically maimed, or even being killed. No one would say it's discrimination against white people because the government doesn't respect white people. Just like no one said it was discrimination against slave owners that slaves were "allowed to work themselves to death".
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/25 03:52 PM
24

IIRC In Canada employment insurance gives the first 55% of your pay while on parental leave. At the time I was in the Navy. The Canadian military tops members up to 90% of their base pay. It was fantastic. It was the best time of my life. Without that, though, almost no one would be able to take parental leave.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 10:48 PM
1

Do you have a link to that statistic?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/25 01:22 PM
31

I've yet to see a feminist accuse MRAs of something when the feminist wasn't doing that exact thing.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/02/25 10:01 PM
2

I think the biggest issues with how feminism sees it is that they interpret it as control = only privilege, a perception of greater agency = only privilege, and a perception of greater competence = only privilege, without considering how all of those things are double edged swords. Oh, I fully agree that my above wasn't the only failing in feminist thinking, and the fact they ignore women's privilege and men's plight is the largest failing in their thinking. I didn't intend to say their gatekeep…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 03:39 PM
2

Hmm, that's a really interesting question. Let me start by saying I'm not a fan of the anecdotal phrasing of your response, but if taken as an example of what is ubiquitous in society I think it works as a solid argument. As a response though I think you're a little off the mark. Close, but missing a bit. Women have always had more power and control over their lives than most people give them credit for, and men have always had less. That's what created both sexism and the women's rights movemen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 01:45 PM
1

After another look, you're right, you did/do understand that it's about perception not reality as was evident in another comment further down and in the op. What I was thinking about is this comment: my feminist sister will say we grew up in a patriarchal family where my dad held all the power, and my mom was essentially an indentured slave People with more agency have more power, right? Not necessarily all the power, but more. but my traditional mom and dad would say thats not true at all, and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 11:17 AM
1

I read you post on this. You did a decent job of explaining it initially, but reading your replies to comments you don't seem to understand it. Alao, the comments highlighted an aspect of it that is both essential to understanding its affects and not explained in the OP. Malagency bias isn't about the level of agency people actually gave, it's about the level of agency they are perceived to have. Men have just as much or as little control over their personal choices as women do. But we precieve …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 10:53 AM
9

https://menarehuman.com/citations/ Np, I should have included this as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 09:56 AM
19

https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-misogyny-myth
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/25 06:15 PM
3

https://www.psypost.org/feminine-advantage-in-harm-perception-obscures-male-victimization/ If you haven't seen this you might enjoy it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 03:01 AM
13

You're probably right. I'm just so tired of seeing masculinity talked about as if it's a choice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/25 10:51 PM
6

I was busy earlier and didn't really give this a proper answer. Let me try again. Most people define masculinity and femininity based on personality traits. But none of those have ever made sense to me. For example: Many will claim men are aggressive and women are passive. But both of those are wrong. A woman who was good at her traditional role (good meaning able/capable, not a value judgement of the role or the woman) was often very assertive even sometimes aggressive within her domain. A moth…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/25 10:22 PM
1

No, I haven't. I'll take a look though, thanks for the recommendation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/25 08:01 PM
2

No, I honestly can't. I've struggled with trying to define masculinity and femininity several times for these conversations. Nothing I can come up with doesn't seem trite and reductionist even to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/25 07:58 PM
-41

What the fuck does that even mean?
/r/MensRights26/01/25 06:03 PM
10

And you missed what I'm saying. Putting on a dress may change how others view me, it doesn't change who I am. You should read the book "Self Made Man" by Norah Vincent. She talks about trying to adopt masculine traits when she's a feminine person. Sufficed to say it causes her a great deal of internal turmoil and mental health issues. You can't change who you are at the core of things, which is what I was talking about. Race, sexual orientation, masculinity/femininity, none of these things are c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/25 04:34 PM
46

Why do people talk so endlessly about their theories on masculinity as if it was a condition? We don't choose to be masculine or feminine anymore than we choose to be gay or straight. Striving to be more or less masculine is just conversion therapy with a new name and with all of the same terrible outcomes. Stop talking about masculinity as if it's a choice, and especially stop talking about masculinity as if it's a disease or a pathology. So much of feminist theory speaks about men "practicing …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/25 11:41 AM
5

Here's the original post. What the actual fuck? Small disclaimer: I (39, female) am not a pdf and I do not condone pdfs in any way. Regarding hebephilia, I am on a personal level strongy averse to the very idea but the fact is that living in Germany, I don't have the right to tell kids older than 13 who they're allowed to fall in love and have sex with. I actually think that if a 14 year old girl is having sex with an 80 year old dude, I dunno, it just feels off, you know? But I don't make the l…
/r/MensRights12/01/25 04:43 PM
2

We need an emotion positivity movement for men much like women's body positivity movement. We need men willing to accept the social stigma and backlash of showing emotions. We need men and women willing to accept those emotions and to see them as strong and attractive, not weak and ugly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/25 11:52 AM
8

I don't normally advocate for the death penalty, but this is beyond redemption. We need her and anyone like her out of the gene pool.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 01:41 PM
1

That's close to being acceptable, but you know what they say, close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. That's still too old to be making out with a 15 year old.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 08:55 PM
1

And if it isn't, it damn well should be.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 08:50 PM
8

why do you go to work? why do man do so many hours? Because that's how men provide for their families. In general, when men become parents they increase their hours at work because that's how they provide for their families. And women decrease their hours at work because having the time and flexibility needed for caregiving is how women provide for their families. if men stop beeing the provider, women get true freedom of choice. because they provide for them selves and are not depending on a ma…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 08:14 PM
10

Actions speak louder than words. If that was the case feminists would be advocating for Legal Paternal Surrender. Instead they vehemently fight against the idea and thus push for men to continue to be seen as nothing more than their traditional gender role of being a provider. Even just the measuring sticks feminists use shows their true colors. If feminists wanted equality they'd recognize the gender pay gap as women having a greater freedom of choice and instead of blaming men for women not ma…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 01:41 PM
15

Show me some feminist activists who work for equality. Please. Every feminist I know of who advocates for men's issues is ostracized by feminists. Karen Decrow, Cassie Jaye, Warren Farrell, Christina Marie Hoff Sommers, Erin Pizzey... Show me feminists who fight for Legal Paternal Surrender so men can't be forced into their traditional gender role at the threat of prison if they're not willing or able. Show me feminists who fight for more men in university. Show me feminists who fight for more m…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 01:28 PM
5

Oh look! A feminist projecting their own utter lack of moral fiber onto men. Make it make sense for me. She says men have no empathy, indicating that's bad. Then she demonstrates that she has no empathy. And she thinks she has the moral high ground?
/r/EverydayMisandry06/01/25 01:55 AM
25

i dont know evil and robotic as a form of dehumanizing men. because there are a lot of evil women out there. or do you mean dictators and people like that? Feminists. Feminists call me evil.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 11:30 PM
14

society in general is used to dehumanize and sexualize women. most of the time devaluating them. That's true. But society also used to dehumanize and treat men as success objects. And it still does. Feminism and the women's rights movement has been great for ending that for women, but instead of doing the same for men it's made things harder for men. nobody shall be treated that way. nor men nor women. I wish.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 11:28 PM
1

Ok, so why don't we set up a system where divorced women who are receiving alimony will be required - drafted if you will - to cook and clean for other women's ex husbands? That way they wouldn't need to see their own ex but they would still be contributing to those who had to suffer enslavement in the work force at the hands of their ex wives. Yes I know this is utterly and absolutely ridiculous. My point is that it's no less ridiculous than alimony.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/25 03:20 PM
16

On a similar but different topic. We leave space for women who lose or never had employable skills when they get divorced. Husbands are ordered to pay alimony to compensate those women. Ok, fine, so be it. But why don't we leave space for men who lose or never had home making skills? Home making is work, right? Homemaking is hard and complicated, right? It takes years to develop all of those skills, the contacts, the knowledge, etc. Yet we call men who don't maintain those skills deaf beats and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/25 01:33 AM
2

https://brenebrown.com/articles/2018/05/17/dehumanizing-always-starts-with-language/ That sort of language is dehumanization. They do it so they can paint men, and those who seek equality for men, as less than human so others won't care about our cause.
/r/Male_Studies31/12/24 04:03 PM
5

Well, like I said, it's the only way I can explain the power disparity feminists claim exists between men and women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/24 09:46 PM
2

I'm not going to look for examples. The way you wrote that it would be all too easy to "no true scottsman" and examples I could offer. But I'll offer this: How else could anyone explain the conclusions they come to?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/24 08:19 PM
6

I think this goes well beyond women's inability to hear what we don't say. Gender roles have forced us to have less empathy for men, so even when we do clearly communicate what we're experiencing people are less apt to hear it than when women do the same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/24 08:12 PM
11

I've worked trades my whole life. And she's well aware of that fact, we've been together for 25 years, married for 20. I worked as an automotive mechanic for 7 years. Joined the Navy and worked as an industrial mechanic for 12 years. Changed trades to work on weapons systems for another 12 years. Then I got out and took a job as an industrial mechanic as a civvie. But you're probably right, despite all of that she probably doesn't really understand how dangerous that work was. She's seen the ste…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/24 06:06 PM
28

Excellent post. I'm glad to see perspectives like yours here. I'd just like to comment on one aspect of what you wrote. There's also the issue with gender norms in general. Parts of feminism pushes against gender norms, but as we know from trans folk, some people benefit from gender affirming behaviour. But without gender, is there normsgender affirming behaviour? Forcing people into gender norms is bad, but the gender norms themselves may not be -- there's some balance there that hasn't been fi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/24 12:17 PM
4

ELI5?
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/24 07:01 PM
16

Stay at home dad here. I did all of the Christmas shopping. Everything was from us. My wife works hard for the money she earns and I work hard to make sure it goes as far as possible and to keep the family and house running smoothly. And we both rock at what we do. This bull shit of minimizing the men's contributions is just more female supremacy from feminists. I read a thread recently where several women were saying going to work is a break from being a stay at home parent. They're delusional.…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/24 01:14 AM
5

Men have no reproduction rights. If a husband and wife gave a baby they both consented to and wanted, and she decides she doesn't want to allow him access to the child he doesn't have access. If he tries to fight for visitation rights or partial custody it takes Herculean efforts and money to just get what women get as a matter of course. Outside of a handful of states that have made abortion illegal, western society has made every conceivable way for women to not be forced into parenthood avail…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/24 10:20 AM
4

A boy can dream, right?
/r/MensRights24/12/24 06:07 PM
7

I agree with the policy change. I don't agree that men should be responsible for fixing this by giving up the opportunity to go to the gym of their choosing. If anything it should be the other women in the gym that are telling the "influencers" to shut it down.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 10:36 AM
5

This is from Karen Decrow, former president of the National Organization for Women. A feminist if there ever was one, but the rare feminist who believed in equality not female supremacy. One aspect of equality between women and men is economics. Anatomy has determined that only women have the right to choose natural parenthood. The courts have properly determined that a man should neither be able to force a woman to have an abortion nor to prevent her from having one, should she so choose. Justi…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/12/24 09:57 PM
3

Yup. Barely more than a year per victim. It should be longer, but it's way better than I expected.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 09:12 AM
3

I'd argue the best interest of the child is not served by a rapist and pedophile having full access to the child.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 09:08 AM
14

so really it's 23 victims that are suffering because of HER actions. The infant is another victim in this.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 09:03 AM
5

It's literally my favorite flavour of ice cream.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/12/24 11:06 AM
40

This. So much, this. There's a ridiculous amount of propaganda pushing women to be extremists. Most of it is masquerading as left wing and/or feminist talking points. The cognitive dissonance of these people has got to be off the charts though. They hate bigotry only to use their politics to justify their own bigotry.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 07:54 PM
9

I mostly agree, but I think we're coming at this from different perspectives. Of course if someone initiated a confrontation with my wife or any of my loved ones I'd do what I can to support them. My issue is with the idea that my SO can initiate the confrontation and by doing so force me into a confrontation on her behalf. That would put me at risk of injury, jail time, possibly even death. She can't make that choice for me, and if she tried, I'd leave her in a heartbeat for being manipulative …
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/24 04:16 PM
24

My body, my choice. I'm not going to put myself at risk of injury and jail time because you choose to do something stupid. The entitlement of these women is simply astounding. And to think, in the past women could expect their husband to defend them from their own stupidity. And feminists called that men owning women. 🙄
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/24 02:29 AM
14

It should be your choice though, not someone else's.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/24 02:27 AM
3

The logical end of feminism. I'm honestly shocked it doesn't happen more often.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 12:03 AM
23

Meanwhile #killallmen was trending for how long?
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/24 01:59 AM
4

https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/ https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/ https://home.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/htdocs/assault.htm https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment There's tons of research showing men are victims just as much as women.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 11:40 PM
2

I like this a lot. So many people read "false accusation" and assume we mean an actual victim. Rapists should be buried under the prison. But malicious false accusers are a vastly different person than a rape victim.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 01:23 AM
16

What an epic piece of shit. Holy fuck
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/24 12:41 AM
13

How is "your body, my choice" any worse than #killallmen? Or really, even as bad? A rape, while horrible of course, lasts a few moments. Death is forever. I'm pretty sure I'd rather be raped than killed.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/11/24 01:27 PM
9

So now you've crossed the line from being naive about abuse to victim blaming.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 06:35 PM
25

It's called financial abuse for a reason. Part of it is feeling trapped, even if you're not. An abuser will tear down your sense of self, take away your social support network, withhold information, etc. etc. Thank you're lucky stars you don't already know the answer to those questions.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 05:45 PM
25

Or don't have control over what she spends.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 04:32 PM
8

Thanks. Microsoft SwiftKey recently "upgraded" its autocorrect. It's fucking terrible. Like whole words and sometimes even phrases will just disappear. It changes words to things no where near what I meant. And it still can't figure a word if every letter is correct except one vowel. 🤦 If I didn't like the layout so much I'd change. I've looked at several other keyboards but even with this terrible autocorrect it's still better. :/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/24 10:08 PM
29

Using strength as a measure of who can hurt whom more is absolutely ridiculous. Weapons, restraints, and sleep can all equalize strength exceedingly well. For example, pourring a kettle of boiling water over someone while their asleep takes next to no strength at all and can cause third degree burns. (watched an interview with a guy who's wife did that to him.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/24 04:28 PM
25

It's the kind of thinking that comes from listening to any media from the past few decades. Women are absolutely convinced that men can and do control everything around them. Even when there's a mountain of evidence to show otherwise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/24 04:17 PM
5

You make good money that someone else spends.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 10:41 AM
7

Patriarchy hurts men too. /s Such a reductionist and thought stopped saying.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/24 11:59 PM
2

Is the left's ideologically driven point of view any more or less illogical than the religious right's ideologically driven point of view?
/r/MensRights20/11/24 10:14 AM
8

You should have asked if it thinks a doodle should have been posted for IWD. I tried walking it down the same path you did but it gave me different answers.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 02:46 AM
6

In 1674 a women's group in the UK wrote a petition to have coffee houses shut down because men were gathering without women. The idea that men gathering without women is somehow harmful to women has existed for a very long time. It's a form of control, imo. Much like not allowing workers to discuss pay it prevents them from learning how they're being exploited.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 10:46 PM
8

Same shit as the other two. I already reported a bunch of posts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/24 01:58 AM
9

Fair enough. In my defense, I've never seen or heard of any of those people prior to this. Also, I'd happily join ranks with anyone who sees things like that. I don't really care what their chosen label is. I care what their politics are and so far, that dude seeks spot on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/24 07:30 PM
20

He did a surprisingly good job. And honestly, I want to thank the hosts for actually bring in people who are well educated and well spoken instead of grifters and claiming they represent the men's rights movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/24 11:57 AM
6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/24 11:42 AM
5

Yeah, there's some disgusting people out there. I reported as many as I could stomach
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 09:18 AM
27

Child porn centered around genital mutilation. As a CSA survivor it was pretty fucking triggering.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 02:54 AM
2

Bad bot
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 02:18 AM
12

/r/ricfetish2 JFC, more child porn on reddit. :(
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 02:17 AM
2

Not only are we only useful for resources, people will demean and belittle us if we're unable to meet their demands. Or just take away professional licenses and even put us in prison if we can't earn enough for their liking. People think we have an endless capacity to earn money and the only reason we wouldn't earn more is because we're lazy. Can't afford to pay child support and pay for heat? Fuck you lazy bastard, pay up and go work more hours. What if I don't want to work more? What if I'm al…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 11:51 AM
9

Our Deepest Fear By Marianne Williamson Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness That most frightens us. We ask ourselves Who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented, fabulous? Actually, who are you not to be? You are a child of God. Your playing small Does not serve the world. There's nothing enlightened about shrinking So that other people won't feel insecure around you. We are all meant to shine…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/24 02:59 PM
0

I fully believe shit like this and several other trends in posting I've seen since the election are psy ops. Be it China, Russia, or an internal agency, its just driving more hatred and divide among Americans. The posts in ULPT about getting people deported were about the worst I've seen. But there's also people (or "people") celebrating others going bankrupt. The party of empathy and lifting everyone together is losing its roots.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/24 06:43 PM
9

Jesus. I don't think I've ever seen someone huffing their own farts harder.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/24 05:58 PM
10

(to any feminists who want to screenshot this and claim this is my fantasy, it absolutely is not my fantasy. I think this would be a horrific and terrible thing to do to someone. I just wish you would understand that it's also horrific and terrible to force men to sign up for a war draft.) Not only that, but just like men they would be taken away from their homes, their families, their friends, their careers, everything, to be shipped off to some remote training center where they'll be put throu…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:04 PM
5

My response is always - We also haven't had a genocide in many years. Should we just legalize genocide?
/r/MensRights07/11/24 11:50 AM
3

Fair points. I certainly wouldn't claim I follow him or think he's the best of us or anything. But I still think he's right in that video.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 10:22 AM
7

Oh, yeah. The illness in question is whatever illness defenders of MGM come up with as "proof" that mutilating infants is somehow better for them. STIs such as AIDS are some of the most common ones mentioned IIRC. He said an illness is killing hundreds of infants in the US each year and additionally he accuses people of falsely stating that circumcising babies protects them from this rare illness. No, he's making fun of people who try to justify MGM by saying it protects against illness when in …
/r/MensRights03/11/24 09:36 AM
5

Circumcision/MGM. It's right there in the parent comment.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 02:53 AM
1

It makes as much sense as advocating for MGM
/r/MensRights03/11/24 01:51 AM
3

That's really fascinating. Thank you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/24 09:27 AM
3

That seems contrary to everything I've seen about how women in the US vote. Do you have a source for that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/24 10:03 PM
21

Because over a century and a half of PR along with a built in gamma bias has taught them that feminism is the force for all that is good and men are the enemy. I wonder if there's anyway out of this blind obedience to feminism beyond men being out in gas chambers and concentration camps like the Nazis did their enemies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/24 08:14 PM
2

And as a group, they have only supported a democrat over a republican TWICE since 1952 ELI5 please?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/24 08:07 PM
31

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9K6owAjIFP0 Paul Elam on sexism against men and how entrenched it is in our society. If the democrats want to appeal to men maybe stop treating men like Hitler treated the Jews prior to the gas chambers and concentration camps. I still firmly believe in left wing politics, I just wish those in power on the left would apply their politics on equality to themselves and stop being so fucking bigoted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/24 10:27 PM
9

I can't wait for this to be blamed on incels.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 05:08 PM
5

30 percent of 354,000 men who took paternity tests in 2003 were not the biological father of the tested child. That doesn't translate to 30% of all children. There's certainly going to be a large bias in that VS society as a whole due to the fact that those with reason to believe they aren't the father will be much more likely to be tested. Still, that's a disgusting amount of paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 06:20 PM
5

Link?
/r/MensRights29/10/24 10:13 AM
5

Don't forget dehumanizing efforts
/r/MensRights29/10/24 03:02 AM
17

Parental rights, including the right to choose not to be a parent. Bodily autonomy, including the right to not have our genitals mutilated against our wishes and the right to not be forced to provide labour and possibly die for the government. The right to equal publicly funded programs. Etc
/r/MensRights29/10/24 02:57 AM
8

Throw in a side dish of older age DV being mostly women as well. IIRC as couples age and men become weaker as they deteriorate faster women beat them more often.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 04:39 PM
19

How about we stop asking women to define who and what we are. Positive Masculinity is me. And you. And my sons. And your father. Etc. Etc. It's all of us. /r/menaregood
/r/EverydayMisandry26/10/24 08:06 PM
6

Grandpa = man, not woman
/r/EverydayMisandry25/10/24 07:47 PM
1

My post has long been deleted. But here's the article https://www.cbc.ca/radio/unreserved/tradition-authenticity-and-the-fight-for-indigenous-identity-1.3281731/are-we-ignoring-missing-and-murdered-indigenous-men-1.3284322
/r/EverydayMisandry24/10/24 12:32 PM
-1

No, it's not.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 09:57 PM
3

I know. I just want any fence sitters to see that they can't answer the questions.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 05:32 PM
2

Incite a riot and attempted insurrection of the US capital in an effort to deny the electoral process and overthrow a democratically elected government.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 05:29 PM
17

What the actual fuck is that? Is that really an ad her campaign put out? Edit: OK, no, it's not an ad from her campaign. Just more right wing propaganda.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 12:45 PM
15

You really think the religious right is going to give men fathers rights? Or end the draft? Or give even half a thought to MGM? If you're looking to men's rights issues for how to vote in this election you're just simply screwed. Neither candidate cares about men's rights. But at least the left cares about things like workplace safety, jobs, the economy, health care, police reform, etc. etc.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 12:44 PM
1

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/02/03/fact-check-capitol-riot-2018-kavanaugh-protests-meme-lacks-context/4343790001/ Really? That tired old chestnut? Those situations are not at all comparable.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 12:40 PM
-6

It’s wild on a sub that supports men’s rights, there would be people who support candidates that actively want to remove men’s rights and push men further down 1) What rights has Harris claimed to want to take away? 2) What ways will Harris push men down? 3) How will trump do better in either of those fronts?
/r/MensRights21/10/24 12:26 PM
-14

Ok Putin might be worse. Then again trump has said he wants to be a dictator so I'm not sure about that.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 10:57 AM
8

The 6th of January just evaporate from your mind?
/r/MensRights21/10/24 10:56 AM
-5

Do you think trump is any more aware of this than she is? Personally, I severely doubt he is.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 10:54 AM
2

How did you come across this year and a third old post?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/24 08:05 AM
48

I'm pretty sure there was nothing new about the white feather campaign aside from the object itself. Men have been manipulated into going to war for millenia.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 10:26 AM
16

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_feather
/r/MensRights15/10/24 10:25 AM
-1

So the other guy is trying to turn her into a door mat by manipulating her into submitting, and you're turning yourself into a door mat by adapting your behaviour to her every whim? Good lord the two of you need to go touch some grass.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 12:19 PM
-2

Im not a soy infused cuck so im not concerned with how it may sound to you or make you feel. Lmao, ok. Have you met vvomen? Yup, many. Their entire existence thrives on deception and manipulation. Bigotry isn't helping you not look like an abuser. From their clothes and make up to how they look you dead in your eyes and tell you they like nice guys who bring them flowers on the first date. More of the same. Have you ever met a woman? Or is this just crap you saw in a tik tok from some other lose…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 10:01 AM
-1

Them saying they want to control her perceptions of them has nothing to do with my assumptions, and everything to do with the saying they want to control someone else.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 09:53 AM
-2

control her entire perception of you, so that she FEELS you are the best man she can get at ALL times. Make that not sound like abuse.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 07:04 AM
19

Stop trying to "make" a woman happy. First step is to marry a woman who has her own life and hobbies so she's not relying on you to be her whole world. That's how you know she's in it for you and not what you can give her.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 11:42 PM
-1

You're describing abuse. Fuck right off with that.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 11:40 PM
24

Don't forget child support payment calculations which are horrendously flawed.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 11:39 PM
4

Fair enough. I agree with that. Feminists and the left are very quick to circle the wagons whenever there's even a remote perception of a threat to a woman, whereas men are left to fend for themselves even when a real threat is presently hurting him. That empathy gap is our biggest hurdle. Until we can fix that we're not going to make any headway.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/24 02:20 AM
1

So you're just going to throw your vote away? This is exactly how the Cons are going to win with like 40% of the vote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/24 01:58 AM
3

I didn't say you weren't. You asked a question, I just gave my answer
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/24 01:57 AM
0

Also Canadian. I'd love to vote NDP But I feel like I need to vote strategically to keep the Cons out of office. If we had ranked ballots I'd absolutely go for NDP first, Liberal second. But I'm afraid of splitting my vote and the NDP isn't polling nearly high enough from what I've seen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/24 09:00 PM
-1

Why? Harris/Walz looks like an actually good choice for once to my limited Canadian viewpoint.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/24 08:57 PM
0

No, they just love sending them to war to die to make rich people richer. No thanks. Between the choices I'd rather the woman that spit on me while I was marching in a parade, than the government that sent me to war.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/24 08:56 PM
2

So which party do you vote for in your country?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/24 08:46 PM
12

Idk how much of this could or should be done at the federal level. I feel like some of these are more of a state/county level thing. Though there are some I disagree with. I'm not American, your state VS federal laws is a mystery to me. Legal paternal surrender I think a legal parental surrender that is equal for both sexes is understandable, but if this is referring to financial abortions, then I disagree. I think the wellbeing of the child should be prioritized and both parents must contribute…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/24 05:24 PM
20

At a federal level: Legal paternal surrender Eliminating or making equal the draft Getting rid of child support and replacing it with equal shared parenting Making illegal all sexist policies in any organization, from gyms to universities/ scholarships Making women only domestic violence shelters illegal Making gendered hiring illegal or putting gendered hiring/policies in places to bring more diversity to places that are woman dominated. Bringing in more men to places like schools, daycares, st…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/24 02:18 PM
91

There's more to left wing politics than gender politics. Social safety nets, systems level thinking, health care, environment, job creation, economics, education, workers rights, capital gains taxes, voting reform... These are all things I care about and the left does better than the right. On gender issues the left is no worse than the right, just in different ways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/24 01:42 PM
12

Is the assumption, that all MRAs are conservative, ubiquitous here? I've never noticed that. But I have noticed plenty of left leaning MRAs over on /r/mensrights. Plenty of right leaning as well but they aren't exclusively right leaning. I'd estimate its roughly evenly split.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 02:16 AM
8

Why are you assuming MRA = conservative? There are plenty of lift leaning MRAs. Myself included. As for rigid gender roles you're not going to find someone who's cis yet follows traditional gender roles less than I do. I'm a stay at home father with a wife who works full time. I also took her name when we got married. Call out the religious conservatives all you want, their ideology is based in traditional gender norms just like feminists are. But to blanket call all MRAs conservatives is wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/24 01:47 AM
32

It's almost like men aren't afraid of commitment, they're afraid of a lack of commitment from their partner.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 01:12 AM
3

In an effort to expand this conversation let's discuss a few issues to see if we're on the same page. Do you believe women should be able to prevent themselves from being forced into parenthood?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 08:32 AM
10

Why do you call yourself a feminist?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 02:10 AM
21

Karen Straughn had some pretty interesting ideas on evolutionary psychology. To paraphrase, women needed to be alive to keep young children alive, but men didn't need to be alive. From an evolutionary standpoint it makes sense that we needed a lower empathy for men in order to send men out to take on the bear/opposing tribe/whatever. It stands to reason there's an evolutionary component to fear of crime. It doesn't excuse the way feminists use that greater empathy as a weapon to deny men opportu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/24 07:55 PM
10

I can't wait to hear from feminists about how this is aCtUaLlY misogyny because it's being done by people who think women can't handle prison, or some shit.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 11:08 AM
21

Thank you for the cptsd link, I didn't know that existed. I left, or got banned I honestly can't remember, from /r/cptsd after seeing all of the misandry and speaking up about it a few times. It turned into a cesspool of misandry masquerading as benevolent misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/24 12:57 AM
18

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx8SMZeyXUw It's staggering, shameful even, how badly the APA treats dealing with men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/24 12:55 AM
5

Unfortunately, everyone sees men as disposable, not just women. That's why most people believe it should be men who go to defend the family from an intruder or a wild animal. Why men should be the only ones drafted for war. Why men don't get protection from abusive relationships. Why men have less homeless shelters per capita. Why raped boys still need to pay child support to their rapists. Etc. Etc. Unfortunately it's not just women who see men this way, it's the majority of society.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/09/24 12:56 PM
10

It's because they see it as normal for men to be hurt or murdered. But it's abnormal for women to be hurt or murdered.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/09/24 11:24 PM
1

I took a look at your comments in this thread, and those replying to you, and I'm honestly appalled at the pro choice people's utter lack of ability to formulate a response to a simple question of "what is your belief on this matter". If a person can't communicate their beliefs, why are they stating them? It's ridiculous. I have no idea why they're all avoiding the question so badly, but please understand those people do not represent the totality of the pro choice. Not even close. I one of your…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 04:50 PM
5

I go with when the fetus begins to respond to stimuli. That's around 20 weeks. Before then elective abortions should be legal. After that point it should be restricted to medically necessary only. The definition of medically necessarily should be between the patient and her doctor. (edit to add, I live in a country where doctors and judges, for example, are valued for their professionalism. Their political opinions aren't a part of their professional decision making. The fact that's not a realit…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 03:59 PM
3

And here I thought diversity was important.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/09/24 12:40 AM
28

If the man doesn't want to pay child support then the man can fight for 50/50 child custody 1) You're entirely missing the point. Men aren't relentless earning machines, some men don't have the money/time/effort/whatever to put into being a parent. Be that via paying child support or having custody. Men need Legal Paternal Surrender for the same reasons women need elective abortion. 2) 50/50 custody should mean no child support is paid, but that is often not the case. 3) bur most men don't want …
/r/MensRights18/09/24 11:48 AM
0

Read it again. They're being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 11:38 AM
21

again, im not saying that it never happens that men are falsely accused and are victims, but im saying that its very uncommon. Who gives a shit how common or uncommon it is? It needs to be punished severely. Sending someone to prison is worse than rape, and often includes rape as well. Rape is a traumatic event that lasts a few minutes. Prison is a traumatic event that lasts years. We as a society understand that purposely traumatizing someone for a few minutes is so wrong that it justifies year…
/r/MensRights17/09/24 09:05 AM
12

of course this would be mentioned as an "ah hah! caught you!" moment against all women accusing men of sexual assault, Point to where that was said but you forget the countless amount of real victims. No we didn't. Don't assume do you know how unlikely the chance of a false sexual assault allegation is? Higher than zero. its not even a good revenge idea as almost all assaulters get off with a slap on the wrist or less. And this is based on what exactly?
/r/MensRights17/09/24 08:56 AM
5

Go ahead and share a link.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/09/24 01:59 PM
39

Jesus fucking christ. Sure, abusive bastards exist. But I have never in my life seen men not only excuse extremely violent abuse, but to congratulate it and blame the victim for it. Fucking hell those women need to be locked up and the key thrown away.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/09/24 11:19 AM
2

When it's legal to mutilate the genitals of infant boys, but not legal to mutilate the genitals of infant girls, that sends a very clear message of who a society cares about and who it does not care about.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 01:16 AM
10

The biggest problem with feminism is the fact that they see men and women in the oppressor/oppressed dichotomy. And they see men's rights advocates as wanting to flip that dichotomy instead of erasing it. Men and women have never been in an oppressor/oppressed relationship, it's always been give and take. PoC and white people have had a clear oppressor/oppressed relationship with slavery. Poor and rich have a similar relationship. But men were never a class above or below women, we were treated …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/24 07:31 PM
5

Some admins will take action, some won't. It's really hit or miss. But still worth reporting.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/09/24 01:21 AM
10

I know.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 02:18 PM
6

Meh, I actually like a few of her songs. I'd even go so far as to say she's alright as a singer. It's almost like we're all different people who have different tastes and it doesn't mean anything.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 02:02 PM
34

They are valid. For directing her therapy. Not for dictating policy.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 01:58 PM
11

What kind of buss shit logic are they trying to force down their readers throats? No reproductive risks? If a woman is raped and gets pregnant she can end the pregnancy. Hell, she can take a plan b pill the next day. Not fun but very little risk. If a man is raped and she gets pregnant his life is drastically changed against his will.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/08/24 09:35 PM
-14

They're still right in this instance. 🤷 Edit, I can't respond below when someone above has blocked me. So I'll add my reply here. It is better to be feared than loved. I'd rather be loved than feared. There's a hell of a long way between not being feared and being "weak, shame-faced pushovers who seek to exert zero leverage on the society". Leaders lead by respect, not fear. Being assertive, not aggressive nor a pushover, is how people communicate when they're not weak.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 02:05 AM
130

Men burnt out, women most affected
/r/MensRights31/08/24 02:02 AM
8

I got banned from there for posting a cbc article showing native men being the primary victims of the natives disappearing. Lovely subreddit
/r/EverydayMisandry26/08/24 07:55 PM
7

And admins
/r/EverydayMisandry26/08/24 07:35 PM
2

Does the major charge go to the drug dealer or the buyer?
/r/MensRights26/08/24 07:24 PM
49

Don't forget the emotional labour. Booking a doctor's appointment to renew a prescription is a lot of emotional labour.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 12:49 PM
43

Equality feels like oppression to the privileged
/r/MensRights26/08/24 12:47 PM
5

What memo would that be?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/24 09:09 PM
50

"women are the primary victims of war"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/24 01:06 PM
1

If op is saying "involuntary fear isn't discrimination" I agree with that. Involuntary fear isn't discrimination. It is prejudice based in stereotyping though, and justifying it is wrong. But if they're tacking on "...and that justifying auto banning men for the crime of male gentials". Then i don't. I don't think they're saying that.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 07:12 AM
9

No, he isn't. He's saying now that it's been proven the accused is innocent, which was a bigger up hill battle for a black man than it would have been for a white man, now he can say the accuser accused him due to race. Thus playing the race card against the gender card.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/08/24 09:55 PM
0

Stay prehistoric
/r/MensRights22/08/24 11:03 PM
-1

Lmao. Nice try to justify bigotry
/r/MensRights22/08/24 10:52 PM
1

I disagree. I have no more in common with Trump as I do Biden, or any a racist, or anyone else that also happens to have a penis. Judging men ahead of time will color any interaction and lead to confirmation bias finding reasons to judge men even when they don't exist. The same is true for any immutable characteristics. Yes, being unbiased is hard. But we'll never get there if we don't challenge biases and we should never excuse it.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 09:24 PM
11

Stop trying to justify bigotry.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 01:48 PM
3

Lol at the stress comparison. I used to maintain and control a 25,000 hp/1.1 million lbft steam plant on a sea going gas station holding millions of gallons of fuel. I had a watch of people under me, operating and maintaining the plant. 600 psi, at 800 °F can kill a person in a hurry. Or if something went wrong we could collide with one of the ships we were fueling. Lots of opportunities for people to die, all on my shoulders. That was early in my career, the responsibilities only got bigger fro…
/r/MensRights22/08/24 01:46 PM
54

As a woman with a history of experiencing sexual harassment from some men, I understand being a bit weary at first when you meet someone you don’t know, I’ll admit it sucks but it’s become survival for us. If I said "As a white person with a history of experiencing being mugged by some black men, I understand being a bit weary at first when you meet someone you don’t know, I’ll admit it sucks but it’s become survival for us." would you find that understandable? Or how about "As a man with a hist…
/r/MensRights22/08/24 10:54 AM
11

The problems with feminism start all the way back in the very beginning. As you mentioned, men and women weren't treated equally. This I totally agree with. Also, women were treated badly, which I also totally agree with. The issue is that feminists did not and still do not agree that men were also treated badly, but they certainly were. A few examples to help paint the picture. Women needed to jump through some hoops to leave a marriage, but when they did they left it free and clear. Men could …
/r/MensRights22/08/24 10:48 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/13numk1/the_male_housework_list_or_honey_do_list_the/ This is an excellent post on this topic
/r/MensRights21/08/24 11:17 PM
5

6+ hours of doing almost nothing. It takes a couple of minutes to load a washer, transfer from the washer to the dryer, take clothes out of the dryer, and fold and put away the load. Maybe 30 minutes total if you're slow at folding and have a ton of small items.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 11:11 PM
2

There's more to why those studies are wrong than just those two reasons. Generally those studies list full time work as anything more than 35 hours per week. Often men work longer hours. Another is that men often commute longer distances. Which takes up more time. A third is that women often over estimate the time they spend on chores, and under estimate the time men spend on those chores. En also under estimate the time they spend on chores so even if asking for self reported data from both sex…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 10:55 PM
15

The difference is the message given to men and women. Men are taught they need to adapt to the modern world. Women are taught the modern world needs to adapt to them. I fully agree, without social constructs pushing things one way or another, men and women are mostly similar and you'd have a similar rate of people along with and against historical norms. But with these social constructs pushing things the way they are for hundreds of years (the woman's movent has existed since the 1800s) people …
/r/MensRights21/08/24 04:47 PM
2

👁‍🗨 💋 👁‍🗨 Ca; anyone translate that into gen X for me? Why is the mouth between the eyes? Why do the eyes look like speech bubbles? Why is the mouth turned like it's going in for a kiss? confused by these young wipper snappers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/24 12:50 PM
10

When my youngest was about 9 months I took 3 months of parental leave and my wife went back to work. After a month with a toddler and an infant I was so bored I strated buying used cars to fix up and resell. The kids were well socialized, clean and fed. All meals were made by me. All cleaning was done. Laundry was done daily. Etc. I still had spare time to fill during nap time.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 10:07 AM
14

Where in western society are any of those legal?
/r/MensRights13/08/24 11:04 AM
1

Respond with 👋👋👋👋
/r/MensRights10/08/24 10:03 AM
15

Yes. Allowing women to control if a man becomes a parent or not, with no input from him, is allowing extortion.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 01:32 PM
29

Literally always. Women have always been more valued than men.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 02:23 AM
4

The left has an analog of Tate, it's /r/menslib. Just as useless and pointless. Just as much of a grift.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 03:51 PM
3

Why is this here? The article is garbage. Right from the start small handful of elite men are in nearly complete control of society No, they're not. The voting public still has a lot of influence and women make up roughly half of the voting public. Feminists can't do anything without first excusing women from any and all responsibility for their roles and influence in society. Women are just as responsible for this mess as men are. Until feminists are willing to admit that we can't move forward.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/24 03:46 PM
6

Women have to carry the baby so yes her body that dies in childbirth potential, her job to raise it since men often walk away, her lifelong poverty. Only if she decides to keep it. Or are you trying to say women aren't capable of making decisions about their own life? They absolutely cannot choose to put the child up for adoption against the fathers will…the the father can take that child. OK. Either way the mother has an option if she isn't able/ready/willing to be a parent. Do men even ask? If…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 01:57 AM
1

Yup, I saw that shit show too.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 01:39 AM
2

Great job tracking that down Who's Hoffmann?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/24 10:00 PM
2

A reasonable elective abortion time line is 20 weeks of pregnancy. That's about when the fetus is starting to respond to stimuli, and what I would consider alive. There is reasonable room for debate on this timeline but for the sake of conversation I think that's a safe place to start. It can take some time for a mother to realize she's pregnant, and it can take some time to get into the doctor to get the abortion if that's what she chooses. So, men should have 5 weeks, ¼ of the timeline, starti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/24 06:28 PM
8

No one is saying keep it n your pants…use a rubber if you don’t want kids. OK. So same goes for women, right? You don't need elective abortions, use birth control if you don't want kids? Why should it all fall on us? With power comes responsibility. Welcome to adulthood. Male birth control will be available in a few years. Will men take it? Unlikely. With sexist women like you defending your present ability to extort men, you're God damn right they will. Not that it'll be enough when not even th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/24 06:27 PM
4

In keeping with any feminist who tries to offer correction to the bad directions the movement is going, she was ostracized from the movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/24 04:57 PM
2

Honestly, that's still too long. The guy should have 5 weeks after he's informed of the pregnancy. That will give the mother time to both realize she's pregnant, and get an abortion if she so desires, before the fetus is viable. Now, I say after he's informed because we need to ensure the mother can't just hide the pregnancy until its too late and still extort money of someone. That said, I don't think I've ever seen a proposal for LPS that didn't include something similar to ensure a father can…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/24 11:27 AM
21

There's a lot of that on /r/science. The last one I saw was about autism. Women feel, there's no criteria for women, etc. etc. Anything to find a way to make it about them and avoid admitting any possible chance that men might have an issue that needs more attention than simply "men need to open up more and be like women".
/r/MensRights28/07/24 09:07 AM
14

Legal Paternal Surrender was first publicly discussed (to the best of my knowledge) by Karen Decrow, a feminist activist and former president of the National Organization for Women, the largest women's rights group in the world. She said "One aspect of equality between women and men is economics. Anatomy has determined that only women have the right to choose natural parenthood. The courts have properly determined that a man should neither be able to force a woman to have an abortion nor to prev…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/24 01:36 AM
19

I always heard it was painless. I had my doubts, but I was not at all prepared for how horrible that was. How a doctor, who's taken an oath to do no harm, could preform that procedure...
/r/MensRights17/07/24 03:03 AM
2

Very well said. You might want to check out /r/leftwingmaleadvocates
/r/MensRights13/07/24 04:54 PM
6

It's the modern day version of watching gladiators kill each other. No thanks
/r/MensRights13/07/24 10:48 AM
9

I don't see the right treating sexual assault of men any more seriously than the left.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 10:45 AM
23

I had to explain to my wife what incel means and where it came from. She used it in a sentence to describe someone being misogynistic, but used it only to mean misogynistic and not what it actually means. She had no idea it was short for involuntarily celibate. And even then it didn't really click for her that this doesn't describe someone as bad until I explained her brother, who is kind and gentle and overall a pretty decent guy, is likely an incel. He's never had a girlfriend or really any lu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/24 11:24 AM
9

Even if I believed her statistic, that's roughly 0.0014% of the world's population of women. Can we just get a grip on reality? Yes, clearly that's still too much and we should be trying to reduce. But is that rate really enough to treat all men as criminals? Why men? What percent of those perpetrators are bald? Or have blond hair? Or grew eyes? Or a mole on their left cheek? Ffs blaming this shit on gender is stupid, as if a gender determines one's choices. And if it does, should we be drawing …
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/24 11:02 AM
1

No they aren't. If you include sciences like biology women are the majority there too. That's why on average unmarried women make more than unmarried men.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 01:47 AM
3

But for men in the West, who are they afraid of? Women, and men acting on women's behalf. What prevents them from speaking up? Fear Is it other men or women? Both Isn’t freedom of speech protected? Only as long as you don't offend those in power. How did it get to this point, and who is behind it? The west has always privileged women over men. Even in the days of slavery female slaves were more protected from physical harm than slave owning men were. Why can't men openly express their expectatio…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 01:07 AM
8

Stop mansplaining the patriarchy!
/r/MensRights05/07/24 08:07 PM
13

Oh no no, you see, it wouldn't be genocide. Men would be reduced to 10% of the population by selective birth/abortion so there wouldn't be a need for outward violence. See, no genocide. /s in case it wasn't obvious I'm mocking the sex supremacist ass holes who agree with that separatist bull shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/24 05:43 PM
7

It never ceases to amazing when feminists complain that it wasn't considered rape for a husband to rape his wife, which has rightfully been fixed, but they ignore this completely like its just natural for women raping men to legal.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/06/24 03:19 PM
1

Egalitarian
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/24 01:51 AM
1

What are the popular and original meanings?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/24 01:49 AM
1

Women in many countries still can’t vote or own their own property. OK, what does that have to do with feminism and the policies it advocates for in western societies? Feminism isn’t bad it’s the idea that individual men are responsible for patriarchy. I love how in the same sentence you say feminism isn't bad and then highlight how it is. 1) there is no patriarchy, there's classism. By naming it after men and blaming men, for the results of classism, you're enabling the classists. 2) Women are …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/24 08:59 PM
3

You really think traditional Christian values are going to fix this? The majority of what feminists push on men is based in traditional Christian values. What we need is a progressive push for men to have modern rights and responsibilities to match what women have, not a regressive push to put women back into ancient gender roles that don't suit today's society. Equal shared parenting instead of child support, equal treatment in courts, equal medical research spending, equal access to parental r…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 10:43 AM
2

A movie is even worse. I've never understood that cliche
/r/MensRights27/06/24 09:30 AM
1

A woman that respects and supports him. Pretty well the same characteristics of a man that women want to date.
/r/MensRights27/06/24 09:28 AM
8

Don't mistake criticism of feminism for criticism of women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 11:24 PM
3

No one should be subjected to the horrors of war against their will. Ever. But if anyone is going to be, then anyone in charge of sending them should also be eligible for the same treatment. So yes, I do agree that anyone of voting age should be included in selective service IF there is going to get a selective service. The much better option is ending it, but again, that'll never happen with the system as it is.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 07:39 PM
7

With half of the population satisfied with only men being drafted and anothet quarter at least also thinking that's right we'll never get anywhere in trying to end selective service. The only way forward is to get everyone involved in the advocacy, and that means starting from a place of it effecting everyone equally. Playing to people's empathy for men will NOT work. On top of that, the present system allows women to exploit men by voting to send men to a war women will never be required to fig…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 07:23 PM
27

Even the fact that the most heinous insults you can throw at someone are about violence against women shows that society cares deeply about women and isn't misogynistic.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/06/24 11:36 AM
2

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Uncle%20Tom
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 08:54 AM
5

I agree with your principles, but I don't see how we could ever overcome the power of that hive mind. If you've got any thoughts on the subject I'd love to read rhem
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 01:48 AM
7

I call them uncle Tom. I think it captures the essence of the of who they are much better than just male feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 01:44 AM
3

Yup, anytime you try to point out how feminism is harmful, they always put women in front of it like a meat shield. "you're hurting women." "you hate women."... No, I hate feminism as it's hurting women and men. But they can't hear you now, all they hear is "you're hurting women"
/r/MensRights19/06/24 06:54 PM
14

Every single time they resort to the Narcissist's Prayer: That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 07:29 AM
3

As feminists often say, the "dark digits" must be very high. I've never seen that phrase before and google isn't helping. Can you explain? In today's world, is there any metric where women actually have it way worse? None that matter unless you're a supremacist. All the metrics I know show that men are the silent victims: in school, university, and crime. Exactly. Feminists will claim it matter that the majority of people who hold political office are men. Meanwhile 1) a person's sex doesn't det…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/24 10:35 AM
2

I fully agree that misogyny is not the answer to misandry. Though it amazes me how often treating women the same way men are treated is called misogyny. One thing I saw another poster write recently was (IIRC) "Men protect their feelings the same way women protect their bodies" and that really hit home. It explains a lot of the misogyny and misandry. IT DOESN'T EXCUSE THE MISOGYNY OR MISANDRY, but it explains where it comes from. You talked about MGTOW and the misogyny in that group, most of tha…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/06/24 09:50 AM
7

Why do you judge men as a group based on the actions of a very small few who have power? There are orders of magnitude more men in positions of powerlessness than who are powerful, so why not judge the group - if you do need to judge the group - by the majority? Furthermore, why do you seem to be implying women would be better if they were in those positions of power? Do you think women are inherently better leaders than men?
/r/MensRights18/06/24 01:50 AM
6

"The Narcissist's Prayer That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it." You're on step 4
/r/MensRights18/06/24 01:38 AM
50

Followed closely by: "Men did it to themselves. The patriarchy hurts men too." Ever realized how closely their bs matches with The Narcissist's Prayer That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 01:32 AM
15

Women are much more likely than men to be murdered by their intimate partners, It used to be even. That chanted when women's domestic violence shelters started opening. to seek medical care for injuries resulting from physical or sexual assaults, Physical abuse isn't the only kind and gatekeeping the many other forms is disgusting. and to lose access to housing as a result of IPV ? Men are much more likely to be in jail and homeless. I'm going to take a stab in the dark and guess many of the men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/24 09:01 PM
18

With the number of women who face no consequences for IPV how many children are growing up with abusive mothers? How many boys are learning to abuse from their mothers? How many of those boys who learn abuse from their mother grow up to be abusers? If you want to stop women from being abused it's time to stop women from teaching their children to abuse. As much as I hate that we need to frame helping abused boys in a way that will help women to get any support at all, at this point I'll take it …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/24 12:57 PM
1

babygirl, Did you just try to insult me by using toxic gender norms about girls being weak as an insult? Dude. Do better. you can't even see a thread where a young woman says something sketchy happened to her without defending the offending male involved. One more time, where did I defend him? there is nothing rational about you. Source, please. hence why i try to get you the fuck out of most threads where you try to spread this bullshit and put forward false narratives. Please stop following me…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/06/24 12:15 AM
1

No, take your women blaming Saying men and women are equal is not blaming women. Try again. r women's shelters are already overflowing and our domestic abuse stats get worse every day. It was half a century ago that research started coming out that showed men and women abuse and are abused at even rates, yet we have one domestic abuse shelter for men in this whole country. Yeah, domestic violence shelters are over flowing, we need way more. But right now it's men who are being under served by th…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/06/24 12:10 AM
1

Oh, dude, there's no desperation here. It's very easy to get you to put your bias on display. I have no issue with her watching out for herself and I have no idea what mental gymnastics you're going through to make that assumption. I have an issue with her bias against men and for women. Gamma bias as its called. https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/gamma-bias-new-theory Or the women are wonderful effect. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect She should have been equally wary…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/06/24 12:04 AM
2

Could that bias be because men are the most likely gender to be found guilty of human trafficking? Yes, it very likely is part of it. But considering that using women to approach is exceedingly common, I'm going to chalk that disparity in verdicts up to more systemic bias of the exact nature that I'm calling out. Women aren't the innocent flowers you seem to believe they are, and men aren't the brutes you seem to think they are. We're much more equal than that. Or are we ignoring the obvious to …
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/24 11:45 PM
1

Or could it simply be that the girls not paying for themselves was in and of itself sketchy Wait, so now you're victim blaming? I'm very confused. Which "girls" (none of them are girls but whatever) are you referring to there? and an older woman paying would have been odd too? Good, I'm glad you're finally seeing things without your bias. Reach more to demonize women for recognizing sketchy tactics in a bar. Where did I demonize women? Calling out a single person for having bias against men and …
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/24 11:40 PM
1

Yes, there is a difference. The difference is that you see one as a threat and one as ok, despite both having the same goal in mind.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/24 11:32 PM
1

1) What does the climate of human trafficking have to do with anything? My post is about the OOP displaying bias against men. 2) Please link to where I said something misogynistic. I'll wait.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/24 11:31 PM
1

1) what context did I cut? The whole post is there. 2) What did I say that's misogynistic?
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/24 10:43 PM
9

They assumed they were safe despite the exceedingly obvious trafficking tactics because those tactics were coming from women. They couldn't even fathom women being bad. But when they realized a man was involved they were willing to see him as bad and started to recognize the situation. It's subtle, but it's a good example of how those women associate men with bad and women with good.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/24 09:26 AM
23

Yup, this shows both ends of the spectrum, misandry and women are wonderful. The scary thing is if the trafficers see that post and change up their tactics based on what they learn.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/06/24 11:19 PM
9

That's the whole OP. Below that was comments.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/06/24 10:37 PM
21

I improved my mental health by retiring. It's glorious. I've literally never been this happy, and calm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/24 07:31 AM
2

It is true. It was required. The fact that those old roles are no longer required is the main reason we're here, to fight for change.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:46 PM
1

Yes we do. In general, men get respect but not empathy, and women get empathy but not respect. https://a voice 4 men dot com/mega-featured/it-all-balances-out/
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:44 PM
2

"men are less valuable because in the unlikely event that there are 100 people left on Earth then one man could impregnate all the women,"... "we evolved to value female life over male life." These two are true though. And without understanding these mechanisms we will never get people to see how gynocentric the world is and we will never get people to see how much traditional gender roles and present day expectations of men alike both dehumanize men. Until we do that, we will never get equality…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:38 PM
16

Always has been.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/24 11:33 AM
21

It's worse than that. These feminists are actively protecting abusers. This is putting people, including many children, directly in harms way. These feminists are culpable and should be treated at such.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/24 11:30 AM
6

Does this mean the present narrative is an attack on men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/24 11:27 AM
2

You are wrong. Depression will hit each person differently.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 03:12 PM
1

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=PPD+men&t=fpas&ia=web
/r/MensRights06/06/24 11:21 AM
10

Men can and do get PPD. That said, I 100% agree she should be checked out by a mental health professional. The people trying to support the mom here aren't wrong. The people who wouldn't support a father in the same situation though, those are the ass holes that should be tossed off a cliff. This is one of many places where women have it better than men. The goal should be to bring men up to women, not being women down to men.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 11:16 AM
4

Do you typically resort to this type of vague unintelligible comments?
/r/MensRights03/06/24 10:28 PM
4

Anything specific, or are you just incompetent across the board?
/r/MensRights03/06/24 08:28 PM
1

Someone should repost it and see how it goes. My account is banned otherwise I would.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/24 11:51 AM
44

I spent 3 months as a stay at home father with an infant and a toddler while my wife was working. The house was spotless, all meals were made from scratch, the kids were very well looked after with outings to socialize, etc. etc. I was so bored I started working on cars during nap time. Being a stay at home parent 200 years ago, doing laundry on a wash board, hand washing every dish, skinning and gutting rabbits or whatever for meals... sure that would be a similar work load to what most men do …
/r/MensRights01/06/24 03:11 PM
14

They established the rights of women to enjoy the profits of their labour, to control real and personal property, to be parties to lawsuits and contracts, and to execute wills on their own behalf. Women were discriminated against. But, you can't discriminate against one sex without discriminating against the other. That's part of the problem with feminists, you keep trying to only look at how things were bad for women and ignore how they were bad for men or how they were good for women. By in ac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 02:22 AM
20

I don't think laws "just happened" to exist where women couldn't vote or own property. I would be interested in any sincere explanation about how such power imbalances "just happen to be" for centuries. Sure. The explanation is that you're wrong. Women owned property. Women had a similar chance to own property as second sons, and many women increased that chance by marrying older men who would die and leave the property to the woman. And woman could vote in municipal elections, just like men cou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/24 11:02 PM
20

Good lord... The only reason women weren't enlisted in the draft is because women were seen as "useless" in the military. No, one reason women weren't drafted is because they weren't as strong as men. When battle meant working every man to his absolute limit, and those limits being beyond what a women's are most of the time, women at that time would have been a hindrance in the army. Another reason, and a vastly more important one, is that you could repopulate with a bunch of women and only a ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/24 10:41 PM
41

Their argument depends on seeing women as useless and not a part of society, while seeing men as all controlling. (Hypoagents vs. hyperagents). Women very much were a part of society and are today, and men aren't all powerful God's. The way to dispute it is to highlight how misogynistic they're being.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/24 08:55 PM
3

The very fact that feminists call people misogynistic in an effort to shut them down shows that our society takes misogyny seriously. The fact that misandry isn't taken seriously proves it is accepted by the majority and is therefore vastly more systemic.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/05/24 10:57 AM
52

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/secretary-of-state-launches-dedicated-strategy-to-break-the-cycle-of-female-offending They're already working on fixing this inequality. By making it vastly worse.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 09:47 PM
10

I haven't seen it mentioned yet. It's because they see men as more powerful than they are. A.k.a. Hyperagency. They think men are these all powerful beings who control not just themselves but the environment around them. If bad men exist, they exist because the good men allow them to. Women see themselves as hypoagents. Meaning being controlled by everyone and everything around themselves. The whole things is rooted in classic gender norms and sexism.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 07:43 AM
26

Men fought alongside of women every step of the way for women's rights. This is the thanks we get for that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 10:03 PM
1

I call the uncle Tom.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/05/24 09:54 PM
7

Yup, there's two groups of feminists in my mind. The coffee shop feminists who hear the slogans and read the headlines about how feminism is for equality and agree with that and end their thinking there. Those feminists I have no issues with, they want equality they're just uneducated. Then there's the feminists who hold power and actively lobby against men's rights and supports. Things like those that had a homeless shelter for men in NYC turned into a homeless shelter for women despite women a…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 08:47 AM
28

And more interested in helping women than protecting children. That's what gets me the most. Ok, I can believe these feminists hate men and ignore all of the credible studies that show IPV is equal in both victims and perpetrators for both sexes because of that hatred. Fine. I don't accept it, but I understand it is the present situation. But to go so far as to defend and excuse women who abuse their children... That... That is what boils my blood. How many children have been forced to live with…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 01:53 AM
1

At no time in recorded history has it ever been safer to be a man than a woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 08:44 AM
2

I don't want to speculate. I sure as fuck hope they don't turn to violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 08:39 AM
1

I don't think they're talking about yoga pants. It's not that shallow, Lol
/r/MensRights13/05/24 02:20 AM
11

If a man wears clothes as revealing as you're talking about and a woman sees him, he'd be charged with sexual harassment. If a woman wears clothes as revealing as you're talking about and a man sees her, he'd still be charged with sexual harassment. Basically, it all boils down to women and women's sexuality are seen as pure and innocent, while men and men's sexuality are seen as impure and violating.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:22 PM
8

That has nothing to do with socialism and/or capitalism. None of what you just said makes any sense other than to enrage a very specific group of well below average intelligence people.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 07:59 AM
7

Is it actually true women could not work, No. There's records of women being masters in trade guilds as far back as they are records. Women were limited from certain jobs to protect them from the hazards of those jobs, or to prevent birth defects from the chemicals involved. This is hardly sexism against women. And in very rare circumstances women weren't allowed to work. This wasn't for decades and centuries, it was for very localized, very finite amounts of time and it was because women didn't…
/r/MensRights09/05/24 11:27 PM
22

If I ever divorce, I'm pretty well diving into MGTOW. I couldn't imagine trying to date in this climate.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:23 PM
9

The interests of both sexes are diametrically opposed, They're not though. For every job that women were restricted from, men were exposed to it. For every time women are forced into caregivers roles, men are forced into provider roles. Every right women didn't have, was a responsibility men did have. All of these things are two sides of one coin. If feminists can't see that and won't fight for equality for all, they're only making things worse.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:20 PM
10

You're not alone.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:15 PM
3

I have a question I hate to ask, and honestly, I'm afraid to ask because it feels like I'm downplaying. But I've got to ask it with the level of dehumanization of men that's happening now. To anyone that feels this is out of turn, you have my utmost respect for what you've been through, please understand that. I need to have a talk with my boys about sexism and misandry in today's world. For any of the black/brown dudes here, how did you have the talk with your kids about racism in a way that is…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:09 PM
21

Thank you for the support. If I may, I highly recommend you watch the documentary "The Red Pill Movie", it's free on YouTube. And despite the very polarizing title is actually a very well done documentary. The film maker, Cassie Jaye, is an award winning feminist documentarian. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7MkSpJk5tM
/r/EverydayMisandry05/05/24 11:27 AM
3

I don't stay away from bears by running away. I stay away from bears by not going where they are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 03:54 PM
2

I think I'd rather not tempt fate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 02:39 PM
26

90%+ of you guys believe that attacking feminism is the most important thing for the men's rights movement. I mean, feminism is the largest source of hatred and dehumanization against men today. - At least in most countries. Ukraine's draft would clearly take priority if we're talking about that area. - Why wouldn't ending that be the top priority?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 09:18 AM
34

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/201811/the-5-steps-dehumanization They're halfway through the list. And there's been more than a few calls for things like cerfews for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 09:07 AM
13

So your take is that men should bottle up their feelings and man up about being dehumanized?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 08:54 AM
2

Black bear, I'd rather see than any person. Black bears are skittish, easy. What about a mother black bear?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 08:31 AM
12

Women not wanting men to gather for leisure is far from new. The Women's Petition Against Coffee Representing to Publick Consideration the Grand Inconveniencies accruing to their Sex from the Excessive Use of that drying, Enfeebling Liquor. Presented to the Right Honorable the Keepers of the Liberty of Venus. By a Well-willer London, Printed 1674. https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Women%27s_Petition_against_Coffee
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 08:28 AM
6

I saw a link on here to a Karen Straughan video.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 01:33 AM
12

I mean, yes. Do Jews not hate Nazis? Do blacks not hate KKK? Of course people are going to hate those who hold to an ideology that hates those people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/24 11:53 PM
2

🥇
/r/MensRights14/04/24 11:28 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=196XCAXfqrI
/r/MensRights14/04/24 04:31 PM
34

Taps mic, steps onto soap box 1) Per capita, of those ordered to pay child support, more women fail to do so than men. 2) With no legal paternal surrender, men have no option to avoid parental responsibilities even if they're raped. How many of those men ordered to pay child support never chose to be a parent in the first place? 3) Child support rates are set vastly higher than they need to be making child support a wealth transfer from men to women. This is not news to any father paying child s…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 04:27 PM
1

Same thing
/r/MensRights14/04/24 09:42 AM
6

I do blame women for men's problems. No less than I blame men for men's problems, and no more either. But even that is seen as misogynistic by people who believe women are incapable of participating in and influencing society. I also mostly only go to women for emotional reasons. Well, one woman. That's because my spouse is a woman and my spouse is the person I confide in and trust the most. I really don't see a problem with any of that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 12:15 AM
14

The right does that with money. The left does it with immutable characteristics. 🤷
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 11:37 AM
5

Within the feminist framework men should have no reason to be angry. With this much privilege our lives should be a fairy tale and if they're not a fairy tale it's either because we're too lazy, we're too stupid to recognize our own privilege, or we just hate women. Of course it's all bullshit. But that's the thought process. If you want to understand a feminist, just forget that anything bad ever happens to men, and forget that anything good ever happens to women.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 02:30 PM
1

It’s painful to know so many men think feminism is about hating men or women’s rights are something that oppose men’s rights. The first step to fixing that is for feminists to stop hating men and to stop opposing men's rights.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 10:04 AM
3

I think this is not true, but I’m certain it is not true *if you have lots of money”. So you know more about what men go through than men do? 🙄
/r/MensRights24/03/24 09:58 AM
0

I answered your questions exactly. If you don't like the answer that's something you're going to have to deal with.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 12:45 AM
1

Why do you think I wrote that? This Yeah it would be a lot better if more men faced this fate. What am I responding to? This The sad part is that the Russian men can leave Russia. It's just Ukrainian men who can't leave Ukraine.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 12:16 AM
2

"misandry doesn't kill" ass holes
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:56 PM
0

Because you wrote the following. Yeah it would be a lot better if more men faced this fate. Wishing men be kidnapped and tortured to death makes you a fuck of a lot worse than a retarded moron.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:55 PM
3

There's nothing invaliding here. Using the example of women being raped as a benchmark for one of the worst things that can happen is the exact opposite of invaliding.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:51 PM
2

Rape, as terrible as it is, only lasts a few minutes. That poor guy is going to be controlled, forced to do things against his will, and treated like a meat shield for the rest of his too short life.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:48 PM
6

So your take is women are weak wilting flowers in need of protection? And my penis make me stab proof? Do you even hear yourself? Why do you think it's ok to be sexist?
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:36 PM
18

The rare occasion I wish reddit gold still existed. 🥇
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:32 PM
10

And I applaud you calling them out. I do it to, frequently. Those that believe their particular brand of bigotry is the correct brand of bigotry and that makes it ok to be biased against people based on immutable characteristics are the most vile people on the planet. That's literally the thought process that brought us the Nazis.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/24 09:58 PM
12

China calls itself a Republic. Hooters calls itself a family restaurant. The Nazis called themselves socialists... Just because someone's claims to be left doesn't mean they are. Actions speak louder than words and anyone who actually wants equality, as is a core belief of the left, will have empathy for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/24 09:12 PM
5

You're 100% on the money. The only reason I didn't highlight those issues is because people already see men as little more than beasts of burden to send to the slaughter house of war with little regard of how those men feel. People aren't ready to see men as fully human, and therefore aren't ready to consider men's feelings when it comes to the type of work we do.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 10:59 AM
12

Exactly. Imagine the uproar if a federal government decided military drafts were no longer needed, the country was safe enough and it was time to divert money from the defence budget to something more pressing. Imagine if that more pressing issue was national day care, and because there wasn't enough day care workers already, all women 18-45 would be required to sign up for a day care draft. If they were called they'd be forced to move somewhere else in the country and to take care of other peop…
/r/MensRights22/03/24 01:18 AM
23

One of the subs claims to be for helping men too /r/menslib? I'll just assume it's that trash pile
/r/MensRights22/03/24 12:33 AM
17

Only 12,908 conscripted soldiers, disparagingly known as zombies, were sent to fight abroad. This was a tiny number compared with the hundreds of thousands of Canadian volunteers https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/conscription If it was such a small number then why force anyone to go? Forcing people to die literally the worst deaths possible, as far away from their loved ones as possible, should be considered a war crime and conscription should be the top discussion point of all h…
/r/MensRights22/03/24 12:29 AM
9

You're liable for CS even if you're raped and she is convicted of raping you.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 01:49 AM
3

I like to use this kind of thinking against feminists. If everything can be twisted into misogyny then I'll either show how what they're saying is misogynistic, or I'll turn it around to show how it's misandric. Always a good time.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 04:58 PM
9

I love this response. It identifies the sexist who thinks women are useless and have no influence on society. If you weren't so gullible as to believe the shit you spew I'd have pity for you. But unfortunately, you're allowing others to use your lack of critical thinking skills to turn you into a pawn, a sexist, and a hate monger.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 08:51 PM
62

Followed by "women weren't allowed to fight"
/r/MensRights19/03/24 08:44 PM
26

Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 08:44 PM
10

This should be considered worse than rape. Yet people walk around as if it's nothing, or worse, act like he is in the wrong.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 08:39 PM
3

study the origins with the suffrage movement etc. The suffergettes were terrorists. Plain and simple. Their bombing and arson campaign is more than enough to prove that. The suffragists on the other hand were advocating for everyone to have the vote because at the time most men and most women couldn't vote. You should learn the history of your own movement No world leaders are women. Don't judge people based on immutable characteristics, that's bigotry. A person's genitals don't determine their …
/r/MensRights16/03/24 06:08 PM
6

This is it. I don't think the women's rights movement was in intended to be a movement of hate, the authors of the movement just didn't realize that's what they were creating. They saw the world through the eyes of women, seeing the worst parts for women and the best parts for men, and took that as ubiquitous. If that's how you see the world, where all men are powerful and all women are powerless, then feminism makes sense. The reality though, is that power is situational. The POTUS is powerful …
/r/MensRights16/03/24 01:36 PM
8

It was 1848. The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. Even then they painted men as psychopaths who actively step over those they love the most. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Sentiments
/r/MensRights16/03/24 12:50 PM
6

barred girls from education beyond sixth grade, from employment outside the home, and from most public spaces, including parks and hair salons. I love how this leaves out what the men are going through. If I had to choose between that or what the men there are going through I think I'd rather that.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 08:09 PM
9

Maybe the do. Think about it. 300 years seems about right for men to finally get up to where women are.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 07:46 PM
15

Aren't they also the same organization that says men and women having the same life span is unequal?
/r/MensRights13/03/24 07:44 PM
5

That's exactly why the phrase "toxic masculinity" is a terrible phrase. It's academic definition and its intuitive definition are worlds apart. "Man flu" has nothing to do with masculinity. The expectation of men to be stoic and just suck it up and deal with whatever is hurting them is a part of toxic gender rolls, or "toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights03/03/24 02:20 AM
20

In general men get sicker for a short amount of time than women when they contract the same illness. Instead of having empathy for men, and understanding that men's immune systems work differently, this is used to disparage men as somehow lesser than. In short, men aren't even allowed to be sick by societal standards.
/r/MensRights02/03/24 02:24 PM
49

Calling a life threatening illness man flu is toxic masculinity. But, a MUCH more appropriate phase would be internalized misandry. It was a man saying those things to another man. Toxic gender norms and internalized misandry were the causes for that.
/r/MensRights02/03/24 02:20 PM
6

But, if the fathers would just cough up tens of thousands of dollars to fight the custody battle, they might be able to have something more than "visitation rights". Clearly it's men's fault. Men are monsters who don't love the kids. /s
/r/MensRights29/02/24 11:38 PM
9

I took parental leave for 3 months when my second was still an infant and my first was barely a toddler. It was by far the best, happiest, and easiest 3 months of my life. It's been 12 years and I still miss it. Anyone that says doing that is harder than working either hates being a parent or has a very easy "job".
/r/MensRights29/02/24 11:35 PM
13

cope. 1) I hate this phrase. It's the internet version of the 16 year old driving his mom's econobox, racing ahead of a sports car that was just puttering down the road, and turning on their 4 ways to show they won the race. If you unironicly tell some one to "cope", you look like a massive twat. 2) They are coping. Clearly. They're enjoying their life. The fact that you're enjoying your life doesn't change that fact in the least. Once again, you look like a massive twat. What's funny is I agree…
/r/MensRights29/02/24 11:27 PM
9

But, but... The members of Parliament are almost all men. Surely men are receiving some unseen benefit from that? If women were in charge they'd make it better for women, so men must also be the same. I wish I was joking. Sadly this is the exact shit I've seen from many feminists.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 11:10 PM
4

thousands of years of disrespect and oppression Is the disrespect and oppression in the room with us? Can you point to it?
/r/EverydayMisandry16/02/24 12:06 AM
5

I know. It just fun to watch them compete in the Olympics version of the mental gymnastics
/r/MensRights11/02/24 07:20 PM
3

Men aren't seen as human. We've been dehumanized for so long that most people see men as some form wild animal who others are forced to live with. We could strike out at any moment and for the most unknown reason. When feminists say they like/respect men, they like/respect us in the same way I like/respect coyotes.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:39 PM
10

If you want to fix the issue of men not being willing and/or able to pay child support, maybe give men the opportunity to choose if they become parents or not. If men had the opportunity to say no to parenthood before they got to that point, women would be better informed and could end a pregnancy before they got to the point where they need to extort someone else to pay for their decisions. But no, they don't see men as human beings, they see us as endless earning machines undeserving of parent…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:25 PM
6

Wow. TIL
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:21 PM
46

You should watch this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=196XCAXfqrI A good friend of mine was left with so little of his income that he had to move back in with his parents to afford the payments. He's one of the kindest people you'll ever meet, her biggest complaint when they divorced was citing a time he spent an hour cleaning the microwave. He already had no debt, only utilities. He drove one of the most fuel efficient vehicles on the road here. Has I addictions or anything like that. His life…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:19 PM
35

How many of those fathers never consented to fatherhood in the first place? How many of those fathers can't afford those payments?
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:09 PM
12

Why is this good?
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:08 PM
6

I think that 90% is massively low. But yes, it is there body and their choice. I full agree with what you're saying.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:06 PM
37

Talks? Safe haven sites have existed for decades.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:05 PM
54

It is sensible. As long as you're a sexist, toxic, mouth breathing, human sized stack of shit who believes me are endless earning machines and only don't pay because they're evil and want women and their children to suffer. To anyone with at least two brain cells floating around in their head that connect only once every few years, yeah, this isn't sensible.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:04 PM
1

This should be considered a violation of basic human rights and treated no different than any other type of slavery/death camps.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/24 02:03 AM
2

They also forget that men were treated just as bad as women throughout history. Yes, women were trusted like shit, but we need to stop ignoring the rest of the story, so were men.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/02/24 12:25 AM
1

Sure, being mistreated by a handful of men in your life may make you a misandrist Don't give them the room to think that's ok. Ever. Bigotry is bigotry, it should never be excused. Let's not forget that misandry stems from the patriarchy There is no patriarchy. Women perpetuate gender norms just as much as men do. There's toxic gender norms, sure. But calling it patriarchy is false. I like what you're saying overall. You just sound like you're still coming out of the fog (fear obligation, and gu…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/02/24 12:23 AM
1

Just remember that men's rights doesn't need to be palatable to feminists either. Fuck them and their supremacy movement.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/02/24 12:13 AM
3

I'd vote for that.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/02/24 12:07 AM
6

Where are all the gender equality advocates? In here, fighting for equality. Are male lives and health less valuable? To most people, especially feminists, yes. Feminism is a movement fr supremacy, not equality. Even a brief look at their history will tell you that. If so, then it turns out that men are oppressed and women are privileged and not vice versa. Throughout history, no. Men and women were pretty equally repressed. Women died in childbirth at a similar rate to men in combat before mode…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/02/24 12:05 AM
3

If you've ever been to the two way range you'd never talk like this. No one who doesn't want to be there should be there. Even if they survive physically the damage to their minds is not something that should be forced on anyone. You sound like the type of kid that wore his tags to the bars in St. Jean and will still wear his basic tshirt out in public after after he gets to his first unit. Or a POG who likes to play infantry. Enjoy your SQ, hopefully those instructors do a better job than your …
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/24 11:29 PM
1

Decade? "The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. " -Declaration of Sentiments, 1848 They've always seen men as little more than psychopaths.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 10:59 AM
1

Jesus, yeah. Though I'll admit, I actively avoid movies with him in it because I find him WAY too full of himself and self congratulatory in just about everything he does. I might actually enjoy watching him bow and scrap for a while.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 03:12 PM
48

Excellent point! They should be glad he got a nomination, it means their movie is getting awards. But the fact that a man is getting awards is bad to them. It's almost like they're movement is more about supremacy than equality.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:30 PM
4

A few points. 1) only one woman in those pics called the actor by name instead of by character, while everyone called the actress and director by name. They don't see Ryan Gosling as a person, just a character. They don't care about him because it's a supremacist movement, not an equality movement. 2) According to their ideology it should be considered much more brave for Ryan Gosling to play Ken than for Margot Robbie to play Barbie. Shouldn't they want him to be awarded for being an "ally" and…
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:12 PM
3

Thanks!
/r/MensRights26/01/24 08:18 PM
8

Men now discriminated against, equality reached. good, now how can we push this even farther? -Feminists
/r/MensRights26/01/24 08:14 PM
3

I would love to see that study. Any chance you can find a link?
/r/MensRights26/01/24 08:06 PM
5

Thanks, corrected.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 01:37 PM
4

How sexist do you need to be to take the stance that nominations for your choose movie aren't enough, they need to be for the right sex? "We're not sexist, we just don't like seeing men win."
/r/MensRights25/01/24 10:00 AM
1

Let us know how it goes.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 09:58 AM
3

I wouldn't have known the Oscars happened if it wasn't for this. Now this bring me joy. They assume the director and lead actress didn't win get nominated because of misogyny instead of assuming others did a better job. It just highlights how much their ideology is based in emotions instead of fact.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 09:21 AM
3

Who gives a shit about being sad. It's not about emotion, or shouldn't be. It's about science. I believe the parts of the article that are backed by science. I don't believe the parts of the article that are based in sparing women negative emotions with no scientific backing.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 08:10 PM
7

I discouraged her from doing it. Thankfully that was enough. That was also the last time I talked to her. If it's of any help, she's so poor and pathetic she's either homeless, fucking someone for a place to stay, or dead. I'm honestly not sure which it is. Any of those situations is more than she deserves, though. I just pity anyone willing to shack up with her.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 06:15 PM
31

When my mother was leaving her 5th husband she tried to convince me she has a right to go after half the money he had put away for his grand daughter's university. It was then that I lost every single ounce of respect I had left for her.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 01:48 PM
34

Probably has more to do with single women making more than single men, which is mainly due to the disparity in educational attainment.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 01:46 PM
4

"women would be better leaders because they're women." It's just supremacy, plan and simple.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 11:03 PM
2

What is "caring violence of the state"?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 08:19 PM
3

But I could see common law creep in, based on assuming any financial support constitutes a signed contract ie a meeting of the minds etc. Is it legal, or should it be legal, for a husband (common law or otherwise) to force his wife to become a parent? If not, then there is no reason a wife should be able to force her husband to become a parent. Treat both parties exactly the same. Just like any apple for orange transaction. What do you suggest? One should be able to read the governing law and no…
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:40 PM
2

How would making legal paternal surrender (LPS) legal end abortions? It would have the opposite effect as more women would terminate their pregnancy when they knew they won't be able to extort half a large portion of the costs of raising a child from someone else.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:37 PM
6

Clinton cheated on his wife too, he was still a great president. What happens in someone's personal life often has very little to do with their professional life.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:35 PM
3

Fucking hell, man. I'm so sorry that shit happened to you. It's legalized extortion. I can't even imagine how that would feel.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:32 PM
28

It 1000% is that significant. Imagine, boys who are raped won't be forced to pay money to his rapest. Men who are stealthed won't need to pay money to their rapist. Men who can't afford to be a parent won't be forced to live in squalor. Men who are child free won't be forced to have a child against his will. This is absolutely ground breaking.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 08:58 PM
3

"The Patriarchy" is nothing more than a dehumanizing conspiracy theory very similar to that of Antisemitic theories. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitic_trope Just take a stroll through the Nazi's theories on Jewish people and religion. Compare how abused those theories are to feminist theories on men.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 06:52 PM
10

(your sarcasm is well understood and appreciated) The only real surprise is that it took so long.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 05:58 PM
1

why was it illegal to abuse women and evan women who were slaves? Because men were expected to protect women. Women were viewed as more important to the survival of the community, and they were because of how infrequently women can have a baby compared to how frequently men can help impregnate a woman. Women needed to be protected, so men were the receivers and dispensers of violence when it needed to happen. If a woman was caught breaking the law, it was her husband would be punished. If someon…
/r/MensRights29/12/23 10:58 AM
1

damn i see, sounds like being a women during that time wasn't as unprivileged as most people seem to think it was. They really weren't. And men weren't as privileged as many people have been lead to believe. For example, all adults in England during the 18th century were able to vote in regional elections. Only land owners were allowed to vote in federal elections. Women had a similar chance to become a land owner as a second son, making it rare for women to be land owners but far from impossibl…
/r/MensRights27/12/23 11:26 AM
65

The most privileged group in history. Very low risk, very low responsibility, every opportunity possible.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 12:03 PM
1

I don't fear women, I fear the justice system they can commandeer to hurt me at will. I'm married now and in all honesty it's good. But I'd be absolutely terrified to take that risk again if we ever divorced.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 03:18 AM
32

I was raised by a single mother who demonized men and professed feminist ideologies. Then I watched Karen Straughan's "Those privileged blue bundles of joy" and it was eye opening. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sAomeiTOKI Feminists measure women's situations by comparing women's worst aspects to men's best aspects. It amounts to supremacy.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 02:06 PM
1

why did they want full custody Like anyone, they wanted access to their children. But instead of fighting for equal custody they fought for women only custody. and why did men use to get full custody? Men used to get full custody because rights weren't seen as something that was inherent to a person, a right was a tool to ensure someone could carry out their responsibilities. Men were the only ones who had the legal responsibility to provide for their children. If a woman worked, and they could …
/r/MensRights23/12/23 05:29 PM
1

what rare circumstances would that be? Proven abuse. Not simply an accusation, it has to have a reasonable level proof. There might be other cases where it would not be good to leave a child with a parent but that's what comes to mind initially.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 05:22 PM
2

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tender_years_doctrine Essentially, women wanted full custody instead of men getting full custody. So they got it. As an aside, that happened decades before women got the right to vote.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 03:41 PM
2

The history, until the tender years doctrine was passed the person with the responsibility to pay for the child got the right to the child. The women's advocacy groups fought to separate that right from the responsibility so women could have the right leaving men with the responsibility. The present situation is that child support payments are both too high (1) for what they are, and shouldn't exist in the first place (2). (1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=196XCAXfqrI (2) instead of child supp…
/r/MensRights23/12/23 01:04 PM
1

The tender years doctrine was in the mid 1800.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 12:52 PM
15

Why? The whole thing against him started with him saying (paraphrasing) dead naming/using the wrong pronouns should not be a criminal offence. And it shouldn't. Someone's desire to not be offended should never trump someone else's right to freedom of speech. That's fascism. That's how we end up with people in prison for speaking out against injustice and government corruption. He saw the writing on the wall and read it aloud. That's it, that's the worst thing he's done. At least that I'm aware o…
/r/MensRights23/12/23 12:12 PM
1

Star Trek has always pushed the boundaries to the progressive side. TOS having a black woman on the bridge. VOY having a woman captain. Taking on issues like race, sexuality, and gender norms. As our overton window shifts TOS has become somewhat backwards, and TNG/DS9/VOY are now seen as center. But both were far left when they came out. SNW and Discovery are no different. Pushing the overton window to the left. And I'm here for it.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 10:49 AM
1

I'd rank them TNG, SNW, ENT, VOY, Picard, (Honourable mention to The Orville), DS9, TOS.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................…
/r/MensRights21/12/23 11:41 PM
17

This is literally our tax dollars at work. Jesus. That hits hard. :(
/r/MensRights21/12/23 09:52 PM
29

Yes! Such wonderful and nuanced characters. As much as I hate measuring a mans "manliness" , Picard to me is one of the pinicles of what it is to be a man. Certainly not the only, but that's also a large part of the point. He is true to himself at all turns, embracing his flaws and not making himself small to make others feel better, but also never making others feel small. Laforge is another favourite role model of mine. A wonderfully fair leader in his own right, despite seeming to have never …
/r/MensRights21/12/23 08:38 PM
0

I've never actually seen DS9. Worth watching? I'm one of the rare few that didn't like it. Too much was focused on religion and in a utopian world there should be no place for religion.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 08:23 PM
52

For the moment. :/
/r/MensRights21/12/23 07:51 PM
5

Don't argue with feminists to change their mind, you never will. Argue with them to show how morally bankrupt and hypocritical they are for whoever is reading the debate.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 12:50 AM
1

"Yes, thank you for proving that men as a whole don't gain from the tiny few who lord power over others." I don’t understand why they randomly pull out this card. They say that men are hurt, killed and abused more than other men, as if the victim is at fault. They do it because women gain power by being seen as hypoagents who aren't capable of yielding power. You're emphasizing men's victim hood in an effort to paint men as humans. This reduces women's strangle hold on the victim narrative. In o…
/r/MensRights17/12/23 12:40 AM
3

I don't understand why some feminists are fascinated with playing the victim card all the time. It has to do with how women gain power. Women derive their power from empathy, not respect. So for women the less they're seen as having agency, the more people empathize with them, the more power they gain. It's why feminists use wesponized incompetence/helplessness pretty well constantly in their debates. "Women need safe haven sites because we live in a system that makes women second class citizens…
/r/MensRights16/12/23 03:42 AM
14

1) The discussion is on legal requirements to step in. There should not be a legal requirement for people to stop a crime they have no involvement in. What you or I would do personally has no bearing on what the law requires us to do. By all means if I saw a person assaulting someone I'd step in and help, as I have done in the past. But to require someone else to do the same is ridiculous. We have no idea what might be going on in their life, what risks they may be taking in the moment, what hid…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:57 PM
2

The whole "blog post" is just them saying "we're not going to come right out and say you can legally extort men with our product, but here's the laws on the subject that don't expressly say you can't. Good luck ladies. Oh, and by the way, it's your body and your choice if you extort as many men as you want."
/r/MensRights13/12/23 01:41 PM
2

Tje last thing I can remember men banding together on was the vote. That took roughly 400 years, several thousand deaths and then a world war.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 06:17 PM
6

Here's a scenario to consider. Let's say the president of the US came out and said we no long need a the draft. The professional military has made it clear they are sufficient and we no long ler need a draft or men to sign up for selectice service. Yay Next up, we want to create a national day care service to ensure all children have the option for free daycare. Also Yay But, we don't know if we have enough day care workers to staff all of the new centers that will be opening. So we need every w…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 04:03 PM
8

On one hand, there's the question of a man's right to decide where and how his genetic material is used. On the other, there's the woman's autonomy over her body and reproductive choices. What the actual fuck‽ 1) No, women's reproductive choices don't have any fucking thing to do with this. Why do we still need to explain consent to women? 2) The implications go a fuck of a lot further than just what our genetic material is being used for. When you're on the hook for 18+ years of payments you ac…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 03:38 PM
4

I'd love to see the reactions if someone made that. You could show someone poking a hole in a condom with a tack and the tag line would be as you said "you don’t need her permission". Then watch the world rightfully blow up.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 01:32 PM
2

I'm not sure what the whole situation is but from what I know I would say there's no need insert it into the conversation that bluntly. Just voice your opinion on issues if they come up and let your egalitarian stance speak for itself.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 12:40 PM
7

Terribly sorry, autocorrect turned aren't into are. I've edited the offending word, try again. If you still can't understand, let me know and I'll try to explain it in more simplistic terms.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 11:48 PM
22

Men's lib is a cesspool of feminist lies and gas lighting. Nothing is allowed there if it doesn't support the feminist narrative, even if that's directly harming the supposed target audience of the sub.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 10:22 PM
15

The downvotes aren't because we believe it's ok to post about wanting to see someone raped, the downvotes are coming because the other poster is defending ignorance and demanding people control the actions of others. They're contributing to the problem and victim blaming those who are good people who can't control what someone else's posts.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 10:21 PM
18

So how do you feel about MRAs who say similar things about feminists? The loudest feminists call for genocide of men, curfews for men, allowing women who murder men to go free, quotas to force men out of higher education, sexist laws that allow men to be removed from their family and home with no due process, refusing men parental rights, and many more. If you believe those that speak the loudest represent the group, and anyone in said group should either control others (who they have no control…
/r/MensRights27/11/23 10:17 PM
1

by your logic women should be able to say no sex without condoms Yes, I do believe women should have the ability to refuse to consent to sex. If a woman's consent to sex requires her partner to juggle while singing the alphabet backwards, then that's her condition to consent. It does not matter what the reason is. Her partner has the choice to abide by it or not have sex. Are you really surprised that I believe women should be able to not consent to sex?? And you don't think that's reasonable???…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 09:49 PM
0

Knowing each other’s location… Ummm safety reasons duh! Good cover for your controlling behaviour. Also you are saying there doesn’t need to be cheating for suspicion, well go ahead and be suspicious of a faithful partner see how well that goes for you. Not all women are so controlling that they wouldn't let their SO be sure. But your assertion that they will is really kind of curious. At the same time, Women should require condoms or weekly STD testing l as well to ensure no STD’s from their hu…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 07:39 PM
3

A trusting and transparent relationship as in being faithful? Trusting as in trusting your partner when they tell you they need that. Transparent as in being willing to be transparent about things not worrying about them want to look and be sure. If you're so faithful why are you worried? In order for there to be suspicion of paternity there would have to be cheating on my part. No there doesn't. That's the point of suspicious. And doesn't even have to be suspicion, it's just a faint bit of doub…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 03:43 PM
3

I'm hoping you got the point I was making, I did, yes. I feel like you've come in to debunk what I was saying No, sorry. I was late, I was getting to bed, and typing quickly. I should have a taken more time to clarity. Yes, that's exactly what I was trying to do. I meant that to be in addition to your point not to detract from it. Those are all very common feminist talking points and all of them are wrong. So on top of what you said, which was right, we can also attack their lies and misrepresen…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 08:52 AM
3

Or that the highest rate of IPV among heterosexual relationships is when men grow old and weak, often due to working blue collar jobs that tear apart their bodies, and their wives start beating them.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 02:43 AM
4

Dude tanked his career for Jada. He was laughing along with the joke until he looked over at her, that's when he sprang into action.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 02:36 AM
14

Weren't allowed to vote, Women were allowed to vote in municipal elections, but not federal elections, just like men. Universal suffrage happened for men after WW1, and for women roughly 10 years later. That's it. An eye blink of time on the historical scale. Not only that, but men had to pay for their right to vote by being willing to be drafted. Women have had no such expectations, they got the vote for a much better deal. And, men died by the thousands fighting to get the vote. The suffergett…
/r/MensRights19/11/23 02:26 AM
8

Men don't have the in group bias, and women don't have the out group bias, to make it work. That's why women had such an easy fight and men such a hard one.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 02:17 AM
9

I expect to have a two-way trusting and transparent relationship No you don't. You've already said you're not willing to be transparent with your partner. You want them to be transparent with you and them to have blind faith in you. If you actually wanted trust and transparency you'd encourage your partner to put aside any fears by getting the test.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 02:11 AM
4

Exactly. Many people pull their mask off after a baby is born, I'd have no problem with a partner who wanted the same level of due diligence.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 02:02 AM
12

What a closed minded, idiotic reply. Trust but verify. Becoming a parent is the largest financial and time investment most of us will ever make. Being 100% sure instead of just 99% is worth the cost, especially when you consider the costs, to the man and even more importantly to the child, if you're wrong. The only thing your take does is protect abusers, it accomplishes nothing good.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 01:59 AM
2

Also don't cohabitate. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/no-home-or-kids-together-but-couple-still-spouses-appeal-court-rules Still not enough
/r/MensRights19/11/23 01:50 AM
19

The expectation is that we'll be the ones receiving and committing violence on behalf of those who are deemed too innocent for those tasks.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 01:51 PM
1

I understand history You clearly don't, which is why is asked you to explain what you think you know of it so I can help you learn the reality. I disregard emotion fueled defensive opinions even if they're from men, Cool. Not sure why you brought that up. in other words you won't get any validation for your bias from me. Ah, you think I'm getting emotional. Got it. So, now that is behind us, can you answer my previous question? I didn't implicate that all men throughout history were phosphoric, …
/r/MensRights30/10/23 07:28 PM
1

I'm not sure what's so funny Your complete lack of understanding of the history of men's and women's rights. Edit to add: also your self flagellation is funny to me. I just wish you'd contain it to yourself instead of implicating all men throughout history as psychopathic narcissists who would happily see their mothers, sisters, daughters... all of the women in their lives whom they loved and cherished, treated as slaves or worse. Luckily that's not what happened and your assertion that it is is…
/r/MensRights29/10/23 04:45 PM
1

Men are seen as hyperagents and women are seen as hypoagents. Feminists advocate for this as much if not more than conservatives do.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 03:32 PM
7

Lmao
/r/MensRights28/10/23 03:25 PM
6

Women are historically somewhat of an opressed class. Men in general oppressed themselves by putting themselves on the forefront of everything because they wanted to be in controll of women. You're gonna need to back those up with some studies or history that shows it.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 03:24 PM
26

Because we actually have an up hill climb. When women "won" the right to vote there had been a history of decades of majority of MPs agreeing they should have it. It was stopped above the parliamentary level. But it goes to show that most people have supported women for centuries. Meanwhile, no one gives two flying fucks about men. Without empathy for us and our cause there will be no change.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 03:22 PM
2

That's been their m.o. since the very beginning. The Tender Years Doctrine wasn't about gender equality, it was about getting women rights while leaving men with responsibilities. The Declaration of Sentiments wasn't about gender equality, it was about blaming men for all of the worlds problems. The suffergettes weren't about gender equality, they wanted the vote for white middle class and up women only. (and they used terrorist tactics to try to get it, putting in a bombing and arson campaign t…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 02:52 PM
3

How many families can afford that? Please for fuck sake think before you post. You just want men to cut their hours back? And then what? Watch as their family starves because they can no longer afford to eat? And what of the greater implications of this? Men contribute the lions share of the taxes to society. Women overall take more tax money from society than they contribute. What's going to happen when men reduce their economic productivity to the point of women's?
/r/MensRights24/10/23 08:14 PM
5

How many families can afford that? Please for fuck sake think before you post. You just want men to cut their hours back? And then what? Watch as their family starves because they can no longer afford to eat? And what of the greater implications of this? Men contribute the lions share of the taxes to society. Women overall take more tax money from society than they contribute. What's going to happen when men reduce their economic productivity to the point of women's?
/r/MensRights24/10/23 08:14 PM
2

So jobs women are drawn to due to their gender are seen as less valuable and there fir paid less? No. Those jobs are seen as having more applicants and therefore employers can pay less. Isn’t that exactly what the prime minister if Iceland said? It may be, but it's still mouth breather level of thinking. Are those jobs actually less important? Less important? This doesn't play into it at all. If it did professional athletes would be making snow plow driver money and snow plow drivers would be ma…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 08:09 PM
6

You're asking the wrong questions. Right. But WHY choose lower paying jobs? Because they can. Why not choose the lower stress/less labour intensive/more hours/etc. work? If I offered you a job for 50,000 or 100,000? What would you take? If I didn't have to work, neither. Who the fuck wants to work? If I had to work, but only a little, I'd choose the $50k if it gave me a better work life balance. What are the factors that make women choose 50? Make? No. Allow? What are the factors that ALLOW wome…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 08:01 PM
2

It has been studied. At length. Women are free to make the choices that bring them fulfillment and flexibility. Men are still restricted into provider roles that put more stress on their bodies, minds, and emotional well-being. The only way this is ever going to be fixed is by forcing women to give up their flexibility and fulfillment, to they take on the same level of responsibility to provide as men. People can yell, and shout, and call men demeaning names until they're blue in the face to try…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 07:43 PM
8

IT’s conclusion was that there was no gap … for childless women. Which just further highlights the female supremacy aspect of feminism. There is a gap for childless women compared to childless men. The last time I looked it was 10%. Not that men were making 10% more, but that women are making 10% more. Where's the uproar about that? I can tell you where it is, lying in a gutter right beside the uproar over the education gap that's wider today than when title IX was introduced, but again, in the …
/r/MensRights24/10/23 07:22 PM
9

It's because women's work is valued less than men's. Clearly every single business owner still believes women don't work as much and that's why the don't do what you said. /s
/r/MensRights24/10/23 06:34 PM
9

I know a dude that was arrested for domestic abuse while he was still bleeding from the stab wounds his wife gave him, and she was completely untouched. He ran outside to try to get away from her and so the neighbourhood would see he wasn't being aggressive towards her. It didn't matter. He still spent the night in jail and his boss had to pick him up the next morning from jail. Our justice system is very rigged against men.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 11:13 PM
19

Enough dehumanizing can push a person to some pretty extremes. I severely doubt most men are going to go out and start killing. But don't be surprised if more guys turn to MGTOW or other such things if the constant dehumanization doesn't let up.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 10:57 PM
6

The HR Rep at my work creeps me right the fuck out. She's made several passes at me that fly just under the radar and all I do is stone wall her every time. The first time I spoke about my wife by name the HR Rep was visibly crest fallen, and yet she's still done the arm touch or try to engage me in almost inappropriate conversations. I'm still new enough at this spot that if she wanted to she could fire me at a moments notice. The last fucking thing I need. Yet there she is, doing what would ea…
/r/MensRights15/10/23 10:46 PM
8

Taking week long turns for night time feedings was the best decision we made for the early days of bringing our little ones home. So many couples we know did day on day off, it's not long enough to recover from the lose of sleep nor long enough to develop a routine with the little ones. A week worked so well for us. If you guys have the ability, I very highly recommend it. I will have to keep an eye on his moods as well as mine after the birth. You sound like a terrific person. I hope all goes w…
/r/MensRights15/10/23 10:28 PM
4

Knowing your needs are dead last doesn't help either. It makes sense, mom just went through the trauma of giving birth, and the baby is brand new. But it's still a hard place to be when you also need some support. That's one more reason I love my wife. After our kids were born I took a month off and she took maternity leave. For that first month we did a week on and a week off for night time feedings. It was her idea and it was amazing. It gave me a chance to bond with them in that intimate and …
/r/MensRights15/10/23 10:22 PM
24

"because women are forced by sexist expectations to take in the burden of not working." feminists probably
/r/MensRights10/10/23 12:20 AM
5

That's not how any of this works. We have subsidized daycare here, it's $10/day for parents. The government pays the rest of the cost to the day care who runs their business as they had before the subsidies. There isn't government agents running the daycares, it's the same people it was before.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 12:17 AM
6

The amount of sexism, racism, and just general judgement based on profiling from the left is astounding for a political ideology founded on an idea of equal opportunities and equality.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 01:37 PM
14

I've been a mod before. Nope, they can't see shit beyond what a normal user can see.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 11:29 PM
22

The parents should have first right of refusal, they shouldn't be forced into being parents either. Agreed with the rest though
/r/MensRights05/10/23 12:32 AM
2

Shit, I didn't know that. :(
/r/Male_Studies10/08/23 12:28 AM
3

"30 years", the study is 13 years old now. I'm not saying you shouldn't have posted it, I'm highlighting that nothing has changed for the better and it's now 40+ years of denying gender symmetry in intimate partner violence.
/r/Male_Studies09/08/23 10:51 PM
2

Patriarchy No. Feminists can't even define what they mean by this. It's nonsense. Just a catch all to blame all problems on men. Rape Culture Yes. But it's not what feminists think it is. No one sane believes it's ok or funny to rape women. It's highly regarded as the most heinous crime. Raping men though, that gets made fun of in kids cartoons with joke about "don't drop the soap" in prison. Male Domination/Dominance Another catch all. Systemic/Institutionalized Misogyny Yes, but for every form…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/23 07:55 PM
62

Proof?
/r/MensRights18/06/23 11:18 AM
1

All good. I'm just as happy to not associate with the bigots on a sub that bans people for wanting equality.
/r/MensRights17/06/23 01:36 AM
1

🙄 I hate bigots like that. Edit, I'm banned as well.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 11:08 PM
1

Exactly! It's a bullying tactic.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 07:58 PM
4

And everyone of those things is men's fault in the eyes of feminism
/r/MensRights14/06/23 10:04 PM
4

Just call them Uncle Toms and leave them be.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 08:36 AM
10

The rates of intimate partner homicide used to be basically even, then women's shelters opened and the rate of women killing their partners dropped much faster than the reverse. If you want to reduce the number of men killing their partners, give men an option and assistance to leave abusive relationships. Similar for the statistics that state the number caused of death in pregnant women is intimate partner homicide. If you want to reduce that rate let's try giving men an option to not be trappe…
/r/MensRights03/06/23 05:45 PM
21

So, patriarchy theory says that men as a group are creating laws that put themselves in a better position compared to women. Okay, makes sense. Gonna have to stop you there, champ. Name a law in western society, and show it actually existed, that put men in a better position compared to women. Or even better, considering many claim men oppress women, show a systemic set of laws from a western country that put men in a better place than women. And please, ensure you're not comparing women of what…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/23 09:04 PM
40

There it is. I'm antifeminist, not because I think women are inferior, but precisely because I think women and men are equal and should be treated as such. Feminism is a hate group who dehumanizes men in order to gain power for women and the leaders of the cult. What's worse, IMO, feminism has done more to harm men and women than it's done to help women. The vast majority of the good feminism claims to have done would have been done without feminists. Instead though they dehumanize men, work to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/23 08:57 PM
24

the kids i often given to the primary caretaker, which is mainly women because men 90% of divorces are handled outside of court and are accepted by both parties. Which is it? Did they both decide and accept their settlement deal or did they not? Why is it men's fault for men's situation and men's fault for women's situation? It's almost like you believe women are so helpless they can't even defend themselves. That's pretty sexist. men are choosing not to fight for their kids Why do men need to f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/23 06:10 AM
32

Salaries are extremely comparable Women earn, last I checked, 10% more than men if they've never been a parent. Not exactly "extremely comparable", unfortunately. before becoming a mother and taking time off or pausing a career. After childbirth mother's incomes go down vs other women, and men's incomes go up vs other men. The problem is that the pressure/choices exist on both sides in equal and opposite directions. We can't fix this by only focusing on women's sides of it. It's very much the mo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/23 04:59 AM
8

The depth of the bond that develops between men should not be understated. That, IMO, is something most feminists don't realize. When we do develop a bond with someone it's typically for life, even if we lose touch, if we find each other again the bond isn't diminished over time. The issue, if there is one, is we don't typically develop a lot of these bonds because we're very careful with who we trust to that level. So on the outside it looks like we don't have as many friends. From this side th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/23 10:52 PM
40

Seems very similar to revenge porn where the goal is to tarnish the person's image. Both are disgusting
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/23 11:18 PM
27

It means the author believes men are incapable of the empathy required to consult the public.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 06:50 PM
13

Trickle down equality.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 11:34 PM
5

Exactly. Women's comfort is not more important than men's right to due process.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 10:11 AM
7

I wish the reddit admins would read this and take it to heart. I recently got a 7 day ban for "harassment" for calling out a bigot who happened to be a woman who is prejudiced against men. Bigotry is bigotry, I don't care what flavour it takes on, I'm going to call it out.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 06:59 PM
22

Yup, the hierarchy goes Women's rights > women's comfort > men's rights > men's comfort. And feminists have done nothing to fix that, only widen the gap.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 10:21 AM
1

I wasn't being a cunt, ya cunt. I was helping you understand why I knew it was sarcasm. If I was being a cunt I would have just downvoted and moved on
/r/MensRights08/04/23 03:20 PM
0

People would be free to make their own decisions, there would be no gendered laws, and we would all have equal responsibilities and equal access to exercise our rights. For the most part people in western society already have freedom to make their own decisions. But things like gendered scholarships for universities would either require an opposite gender or the gendered aspects would need to be removed. Title IX should be for everyone. Also any state funded supports such as domestic violence sh…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 04:31 PM
2

Just wow. :(
/r/EverydayMisandry07/04/23 02:15 PM
1

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=%2FS
/r/MensRights07/04/23 11:45 AM
1

So you've lost all faith in a certain group of people based solely on an immutable characteristic... And you think you're the righteous one? "bigot noun big·​ot ˈbi-gət Synonyms of bigot : a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance"
/r/MensRights06/04/23 10:40 AM
1

You seem to be coming into this with the expectation that the men's rights movement is the polar opposite of feminism. Feminism teaches that men are oppressors and women are victims. So the obvious conclusion many feminists seem to form is that MRAs must feel that women are oppressors and men are victims. Feminists then, somewhat reasonably I'll admit, look at the ways women are disadvantaged and conclude that MRAs must therefore be pushing to further that divide. But the initial premise is wher…
/r/MensRights06/04/23 10:23 AM
3

What they also completely ignore is how it infantilizes women. The whole argument hinges on seeing women as incapable of being accountable for their own decisions. Either women can't be trusted to keep the best interests of the child in mind and will have the child even when the mother isn't able/ready for motherhood, or the mother is capable of caring for the child on her own and society won't believe her and insists she needs help. The cognitive dissonance of feminists who defend this is baffl…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 09:56 PM
2

And they can just obfuscate those male victims anyway. It's easy enough to claim x number of women something something and never make a comparison. The goal is to use the power of the empathy gap to it's fullest extent. Men's suffering, logic, accuracy, cognitive dissonance, equality, non of it matters. All they care about is thier victim status and what they can get for it.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 09:29 PM
4

arguing with today's feminists is a HUGE waste of time I never expect to change their mind, my goal is to show the audience how absurd and supremacist feminist talking points are. Normally if you just keep replying they'll do the hard work for you. It typically doesn't take more than a few replies before the full on hatred is exposed.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 09:18 PM
1

Because by calling you a misogynist, something that is highly disliked by most of society, they expect you to be shamed into being in the defensive. What many don't realize is that their assumption of the accusations power is proof that society is in fact not misogynistic which you can often use to further tear apart their terrible ideology.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 09:13 PM
5

But we need to believe women, they would never lie. Men though, they lie all the time. #equality /s
/r/EverydayMisandry22/03/23 04:19 PM
1

You think feminism is government driven?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/23 08:38 AM
22

Had a woman try to kick me in the nuts one time. I blocked her with my shin. She hurt her foot and cried foul as if I was the perpetrator. Fuck I hate people like that.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 01:29 AM
15

Here's a thought for you, why use the earnings gap as a measurement of equality? You know what I'd rather have more than a high paying high stress job? The lack of need of a high paying high stress job. Stress leads to reduced lifespan, lower quality of life, worse health outcomes, suicide in some cases, and many other things. What do men have more of than women? All of those things. What does increased time with family, flexible hours, and reduced stress lead to? A feeling of fulfillment, bette…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/23 03:45 PM
5

In which part of this process do incels choose to be incels as you indicated in your post above?
/r/MensRights19/03/23 01:26 PM
2

Prim on the subject of incels. She covered it pretty well imo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdPe8OkWmt4
/r/MensRights19/03/23 12:22 PM
2

Can you define "incel" in your own words?
/r/MensRights19/03/23 12:19 PM
1

There are no statistics that show women attempt more. That's pure fiction. Every article and opinion pieces just links to another article or opinion piece. As for toxic masculinity, women are as much responsible for that as men are. Many feminists use that to frame it as men's fault but to say women aren't also responsible for toxic masculinity is sexist as it treats women as hypoagents or child like. On top of that, IIRC there are studies that show men do reach out for help prior to suicide. Ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/23 11:06 AM
11

Myself, I love it when someone tells me what my opinion and personal experiences are. It always makes me feel heard and appreciated. /s
/r/MensRights13/03/23 02:14 AM
2

Yet so many people find that math incredibly difficult to the point that asking them to understand it is like asking them to argue the theory of relativity with Einstein. It's baffling.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 08:58 PM
3

Barely making ends meet =/= being a loser. But otherwise I agree
/r/MensRights08/03/23 11:04 AM
1

I feel I need to explain where I'm coming from. Local family courts have the policy of maintaining the quality of life of the children after the divorce. That means that while the two parents are now supporting two homes, the home the children are primarily living in needs to be similar in value and content to the pre-divorce home. As the mother typically gets the majority of custody, that means the fathers income is stripped to the bare bones with a similar share going to his ex and kids after …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/23 09:51 PM
1

Yes, in a way. It's a particular type of it. A reserved and distant type that might not actually please the recipient. Can you see that it is built on a foundation of not burdening others as a means of pleasing them? Whether you believe it or not has little bearing on reality. As long as society perceives women to be the primary caregiver, who will the school ring when the kid is sick? I agree with what you've said, but women typically doing those tasks doesn't mean they're doing more. It only m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/23 08:19 PM
1

I'm not sure how to respond to all of that. I'm not even sure if I should respond. I guess I'll just say this. I hope you can find your happiness, whatever that may be. If you have any other questions I'd be happy to answer as I can.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/23 08:00 PM
2

I think that there are a few possible reasons to explain away why married women initiate divorces at about 3 times the rate of men... a: men are expected to be stoic, and thus put up with unsatisfying marriages that they really should leave d: women are conditioned to be people pleasers. But after spending a decade being responsible for and exercising authority over their children, women can often 'find their voice' and start saying no to things that their younger selves would have gone along wi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/23 01:28 PM
9

My favorite thing to point out to misandrists is their use of misogyny as a shaming tool works because people feel shame at the idea of being perceived as misogynistic. But being called a misandrist meets no such reaction. That is because no one gives a shit about men but they do care about women. They prove their own lies.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/23 04:32 PM
8

"Threatened"? That's a strawman. Try again.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 06:58 PM
0

I ask them for a study that shows women attempt more often. I ask for that because they don't exist. Every article and opinion piece just sources another article or opinion piece, they never come back to a study as a source.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 06:59 PM
2

Hey, sorry for the delayed response. ... means I do have to scrutinize some...I do this with ALL information I'm presented with, as everyone should. Agreed! I really am grateful for what you've written, and I appreciate the time you've taken out of your day to write it. Thanks This is a very interesting side to things I haven't heard before. Yeah, feminists have sent death threats to those that try to expose this type of information. I'm not surprised it isn't readily known, unfortunately. Most …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/23 05:04 PM
10

I understand some people seeing this may have their vices with women; I don't think you'll find many here that hate women. Many of us are anti-feminists, but that in now way means we are anti-women. You're safe here, and I think I can speak for most of the users when I say we appreciate your questions. As for a chronological account of men's issues, I don't know of any. You'd have to start with the history of humanity, and remove radical feminism's twisting of it. Ideas like men owned women as p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/23 01:08 PM
2

Let professionals determine if the accused is claiming they're trans truthfully or not. I didn't think that needed to be spelled out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/23 11:58 AM
3

Take things on a case by case basis.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 11:54 PM
2

Yes, I can see your comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 04:24 PM
5

Absolutely. But what do we do about people who have traumas? Simply pretend they don’t exist? This isn't a game where someone is going to be traumatized and it's just a matter of shifting that trauma to whomever you're most comfortable being on the receiving end. We can have men's and women's safe spaces without the bigotry that all men are violent rapey bastards. That doesn't mean pretending trauma doesn't exist, it means not traumatizing others. Because that’s what such narrative is proposing.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 02:42 PM
6

What's false about it? Judging people based on immutable characteristics or other such things is bigotry and shouldn't be tolerated. I'm sick of hearing this shit as if it's ok to shit on men and we should just take it. Just because I was born with a dick doesn't make me literally the lowest form of life on earth (a rapest)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 02:06 PM
18

I’m not against the existence of shelters for cis women only. That’s where I differ from this sub, as my impression is that the general consensus here is that there should be no segregation in ANY shelter. I think you're misreading the room. IPV is suffered by men and women at basically equal numbers, and is committed by men and women in basically equal numbers, and for basically the same reasons. Our point is that everyone should have equal supports. If that comes in the form of shelters open t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 02:02 PM
13

but we all know what that actually looks like. Trickle down equality. It doesn't work in economics either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 01:42 PM
11

You're derailing. In the chain of; the problem doesn't exist prove it, ok if it exists it's not that bad, and ok if it is that bad it's men's fault, you're on step one. The rest of us have seen the NOW lobbyists fighting against fathers rights, the feminists fighting against men's shelters, the feminists protesting men discussing issues, the Title IX cases going unanswered despite clear violations, the stripping of rights to due process, etc. etc. Go find your own surveys. We've done the reading…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 01:40 PM
9

excluding trans women is that those women are fleeing domestic violence, Do you know what being trans means? Its not inter-personal violence, I'll give you that hint. therefore having people who used to be male in a space that's supposed to be safe could very much be cause for stress for those women victims of DV. Restating an argument based on a fabrication as if it had any merit at all isn't helping anyone or anything. And, the idea that it's ok to pain all men as dangerous because of the acti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 01:31 PM
2

I can understand women being very uncomfortable with the idea of trans-women in refuges/shelters, we've had an issue of a trans-woman convicted rapist being sent to a female prison over here. I can understand Nazis being very uncomfortable with the idea of Jews in refuges/shelters, we've had an issue of a Jew convicted rapist being sent to a Nazi prison over here. I can understand Whites being very uncomfortable with the idea of Blacks in refuges/shelters, we've had an issue of a Black convicted…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 01:25 PM
2

IF I became aware of it (doubtful as I know nothing about what's happening so far) I'd be upset.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/23 10:29 AM
1

The problem is it wouldn't be men vs women, it'd be men vs feminists. IMO there's probably enough uncle Tom's (male feminists) that the "men" in this scenario would have a hard fight.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/23 01:54 AM
10

The only things I know about this dude come from headlines and memes. And I only know that from scrolling past them. I know nothing of substance about him or the case (is there a case?) against him. If he's guilty or innocent makes zero difference to me, as long as due process is up held and justice and served.
/r/AntiFeminists21/02/23 12:55 AM
1

They have legal paternal surrender to give men an option to exercise their parental rights?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:26 AM
6

Can you name a single country that adheres to the basic principles of equality?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 06:02 AM
3

Sexism through policies that discriminate against men. Title IX dictates that all school policies and activities should be equal between the sexes yet last time I counted there's an order of magnitude more scholarships available to women then to men and more women attending and graduating university at all levels. In fact there's a larger disparity now than when title IX was first introduced. Yet the extreme left continues to push for more women in university. Thousands of studies have concluded…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 04:34 PM
6

So any other seeing the posts will see how unreasonable their points are, I assume.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/23 12:36 PM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7MkSpJk5tM It might be time to watch some Cassie Jaye. Welcome to the world of loving both sexes. :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/23 09:50 PM
1

You should probably do some more research on your chosen lable. It's not as innocent as you seem to think.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/23 01:17 PM
3

There is nothing legitimately anti-feminist on this sub The post you're commenting in is about feminists fear mongering about IPV being a gendered crime, treating supports like a zero sum game, erasing female abusers and male & children victims. There have been thousands of studies showing that IPV is perpetuated by men and women at very similar rates. The CDC even shows that women instigate more often than men, and that lesbian relationships have the highest prevalence of IPV. Yet we're trying …
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/23 04:54 PM
1

Ok, sure. So let's try to rank what society seems to care about, in order of what importance to society. Women Children Racism The economy/inflation Wealth inequality Climate change Local sports teams Bing watching the latest fad show What they're going to wear tomorrow Making their grocery list Men So yeah, sure. Men are in the list. We're just so far down that trickle down economics will be realized before trickle down gender equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/23 09:09 PM
5

I've never read/watched a single thing Tate has said. Do the users here actually pay attention to him?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/23 01:51 PM
1

What are your thoughts on temporary quotas and such to help get a group past generations of systemic that caused inequalities? Locally there is a Black Business Initiative to help encourage black people to open more businesses as that has previously been an underrepresented group in business ownership. There's also programs to help Aboriginals learn marketable skills to help them out of poverty. In the US Title IX when it was first introduced to encourage more women into university. And so on. D…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/23 01:13 PM
1

How is that Marxist? I fully agree it's inaccurate, but Marxist? Wasn't Marx about class war?
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 10:20 AM
1

I think birth control needs to be the top of that list. But yeah, it was never men preventing women from working, in fact women have always been in the workforce, just in smaller numbers and protected from the most dangerous jobs. What prevented women from "working" was the work load of running a home.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 10:17 AM
1

God doesn't exist. But I did report you nonetheless.
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 12:59 PM
1

So you're trying to make pedophilia a partisan issue and to lump a horrific crime in with something you don't like to make the crime not that bad to huh? Anything else you do to justify your crimes?
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 12:58 PM
1

1) This has absolutely nothing to do with feminism. 2) Transgender and pedophilia aren't the same thing and lumping them together is exactly what you're claiming the left is doing. 3) Making pedophilia a political issue instead of a bipartisan issue is the twisted thing, and again, you're doing exactly what you claim The Left TM is doing. 4) Raping a minor, be they a toddler or a teenager, is disgusting. Yes it gets more disgusting the younger they are but attempting to justify statutory rape as…
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 12:07 PM
3

No. Why would I?
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/23 06:37 PM
4

It's a lot more than unity, men help them as well. It's the empathy gap where both sexes have more empathy for women than for men.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/23 12:49 AM
10

Because the ones that say those things are too narcissistic to think of anyone but themselves and therefore when someone complains that dating is hard all they hear is "dating me is hard". Of course from that point all they can think about is people feeling entitled to them not realizing how entitled it is to think anyone wants someone so self centered.
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/23 11:41 PM
3

Solid point and I'm glad you made it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/23 08:10 PM
4

I do want to emphasize that these points need to be heard and if he's getting traction I tip my hat to him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/23 12:59 PM
7

On one hand the points this guys is making need to be said again and again. But everything I've heard him say is just recycled Dr. Warren Farrell points.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/23 01:20 AM
4

Upper left is Delores Umbridge. (sp?) She's evil incarnate. For someone that looks like she'd bake the most delicious cookies ever she's actually a wonderfully well written villain and the actress played her perfectly. I honestly don't know who would be worse to spend time with, her for the two feminists. Both would spend every second trying to get you to hate yourself so much you'd kill yourself. No idea about the Bella either.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/23 11:29 PM
1

Source? (seriously, I've never heard that before and I'd like to know more.)
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/23 07:36 PM
5

Good question. I was staunchly feminist growing up. Much like another poster I grew up with a single mother who demonized men and spouted feminist dogma. She paraded boyfriend after boyfriend through my childhood each one more abusive than the last. Looking back I realized she was orchestrating a lot of the abuse. She wasn't a victim she made me believe but the main abuser hiding behind proxies. Also like the other poster I joined the military early on, 18 for me. That was after she kicked me ou…
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/23 05:10 PM
1

That's bull shit. It's just more taking accountability from women and putting it on men. She is far and away the most responsible for her action. The other guys are responsible for their part in her cheating. And the husband is a victim who deserves a wife that doesn't cheat.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/23 11:56 AM
2

theres now 300 comments I wish you luck. :) feminism cannot be properly discussed while excluding racial issues I disagree. Sexism and racism are vastly different animals. Feminism's appropriating of the oppression caused by racial issues as similar to sexism is at best disguided and at worst a calculated move to use the power of the empathy gap to further advantage women over men. Racism exists because people invaded, enslaved, and oppressed another race/group of people. Sexism exists because b…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 06:04 PM
3

If you put a "\" in front of the # it'll show up as a hashtag instead of being seen as markup code for make everything huge by reddit.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 04:20 PM
7

Exceedingly well put!
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 02:57 PM
6

Very well put. I'll add this, when title IX was introduced in the US the disparity in education attainment was lower than it is now, but in the other direction. Yet, as you observed, there's no outcry to help men and boys.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 02:54 PM
5

I'm not OP but I'll give these a shot. Why is the nuclear family ideal? You should take a look at Dr. Warren Farrell's work and the issues fatherlessness contributes to. I'd highly recommend his book "The Boy Crisis". Not having both parents actively involved in the kids life is very detrimental. Not everyone wants to get married, including men. Whats wrong with no-fault divorce laws in your opinion? No fault divorce in combination with family courts biases and how child support is calculated ha…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 02:43 PM
5

I greatly appreciate that you're taking the time to hear us out. I wish more feminists would be open minded and seek other opinions. I myself was a feminist before I realized how damaging the ideology is. Feminism is about "equality" only when looking a very small number of metrics and vehemently and violently denying the existence of any other metrics. The ones that are ignored are anything that shows women's privileges and men's disadvantages. The ones feminism will acknowledge are the ones th…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 01:13 PM
3

I've yet to find something that's sexist that isn't sexist to both sexes at the same time. It might be "benevolent" sexism to one and often what's considered benevolent changes over time - for example keeping women away from certain jobs was done originally to help them by protecting them from harm, now its considered malevolent because its restrictive, and it was sexist to men by subjecting them to those dangers and treating them as disposable - but sexism is always sexist to both sexes. This i…
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 12:14 PM
1

Thanks
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/23 08:37 PM
1

I'm asking you
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/23 08:24 PM
1

what's the difference between casual and fashionable? You can't be both ? Strawman much?
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/23 10:44 AM
1

What privilege(s) do white cis gendered males have over white vis gendered females?
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/23 10:42 AM
2

R Diabla would like to take that challenge.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/23 02:15 AM
3

Feminism. It's built upon hatred and dehumanizing of men, female supremacy, and propaganda.
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/23 02:14 PM
3

Nevermind the recent Andrew Tate accusation, where the "victim" has now spoken out multiple times, saying that she does not want the allegations, he did not deserve to be arrested, and the video in question was a bedroom roleplay. Do you have a source. I know next to nothing about this case
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/23 01:48 PM
2

I'm so sorry. I know some of that pain (shitty feminist mother) but to have a good dad die like that on top of her is something I can't even imagine. Good for you for getting back to the gym. That's incredible. If you don't mind, I'm steeling his line about you being an upgrade. My oldest is like a clone of me but I want him to do better in life than I have. I really like that line as a motivational tool. Your dad seems like an awesome guy. :'|
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/23 06:18 PM
8

I'm reminded of the boy who cried wolf. The fact that men complain about pain a lot less often so when they do its taken more seriously could explain the differences in care these women are seeing. And they eluded to that in the article but brushed right past it as if it wouldn't factor in. The woman in the article saying she was at a 12 on a scale of 1 to 10... Come on. If you're at a 10 you wouldn't be able to speak, you'd either be passed out or screaming. She was being histrionic. Of course …
/r/AntiFeminists09/01/23 12:54 AM
25

And if you call out that cognitive dissonance you get either "Women don't have the power to change things, men need to do that on their own." (Which is sexist against women.) Which isn't true women are half of society and do have influence and power over decisions and policy. Or you get "women made all of their changes in their own, men need to make their changes on their own." Which is also false as men helped women all along this journey of feminism. Or you get gaslighting about trickle down e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/23 03:52 PM
54

Perhaps these people think that men don’t have the same insecurities as women? Perhaps they deserve it? Perhaps they just don’t care? What exactly am I missing here? Men have been so dehumanized that women and society at large don't think men experience pain as much as women do even in the same circumstances. There are countless studies that show the gender empathy gap, this is just one of them. https://www.reddit.com/r/Male_Studies/comments/104utrl/are_female_stalkers_more_violent_than_male/ An…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/23 03:39 PM
4

Oh no! Anyway.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/01/23 02:46 PM
1

Agreed!
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/23 01:56 PM
1

the core discussion of feminism was always around how men needed to make improvements to their behavior. Only, they just never had any discussions on what changes women needed to do to their behavior. And there was more than a handful of changes that needed to be made, believe me. I wholeheartedly agree with this. I don't think individuals making personal choices should be shamed for those choices though.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/23 01:20 PM
1

Lots to unpack here so I'll take things point by point and expand/answer as I can for myself. Where do you draw the line? The label "feminist" matters none, what matters is the actions and beliefs. If a person is for equality and labels themselves feminist they're good in my book. Maybe a little mislead but that's a different topic. On the other hand if a person says they're for equality but will ignore all of the structural and systemic issues men face then they're a supremacist piece of shit i…
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/23 01:07 PM
3

For holding her for 3 weeks.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/23 11:47 AM
13

Equality is equality, women in Iran and anywhere else should be free to express themselves, seek education, etc. While this is off topic for the subreddit, we should also be for equality which is what those protests in Iran are about.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/23 11:47 AM
2

Cptsdmemes is terrible for sexism as well.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/23 11:38 AM
16

Was the "/s" necessary? Have you read feminist texts? Seen the Council for Women and Girls that has no counter for men. There's NOW. The Duluth model is the result of feminists organizating to discriminate against men... And then there's that book "how to destroy a man". They're out and proud of their discrimination and they are organized about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/23 11:15 AM
2

LMFAO Weren't you just telling another woman how to live her life? Can you sing another song? This projection is getting old. Also, not everything is about you. You don't represent all women.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 03:56 PM
1

So statistics are cherry picked if you don't like them, but completely valid even if they come from an obviously biased source.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 03:39 PM
2

No it's not. :)
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 02:47 PM
2

Yes. Scientific study is a very good way to learn. Maybe you should try it.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 02:46 PM
10

All feminists want is for men to pull their weight as much as we do, Men already do more on average. Men work more hours per week, and more years per lifetime while also dying younger. and to have the ability to leave and support ourselves as easily as he can. So you're in favor of getting rid of alimony and child support and replacing them with 50:50 custody and actual accountability?
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 02:12 AM
8

easy access to them or *even know about them, can afford them, know they need them, can get a ride to the store, know how to use them perfectly, remember to use them, Yes accountability and responsibility is difficult. But I think women are capable of it, they are equal to men after all. And finally, none of that is nearly as affective as using a condom + pulling out :) Lmao, yes it is. Vastly more effective when women can legally force something upon men against their consent.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 12:46 AM
6

In some states. Not all. And women still have access to medically necessary abortion as well as having control of contraceptives, emergency contraceptives, abortion pills, safe haven sites and adoption. So it's not like women lost their ability to exercise their parental rights.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 12:35 AM
0

you can not tell someone else what to do with their body. Agreed! So you support LPS then?
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 12:32 AM
5

Which rights are being infringed upon?
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 12:27 AM
1

Great response. Very detailed and reasonable. Except the part where you didn't address the majority of the issue. You know, the part where women can legally force men to pay for things the man didn't consent to.
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 12:26 AM
1

Who said otherwise?
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 12:22 AM
1

Awesome! It's great that everyone is happy then.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/23 11:23 PM
-1

Why? Marital rape exists. Consent to marriage is not consent to sex and it isn't consent to being a parent.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/23 10:56 PM
6

Pulling out is not a viable form of contraceptive. Men's only option is condoms, but that is not even remotely enough and women can see if the man is wearing in and refuse sex if he isn't. So condoms isn't a form of contraceptive that men solely control either. Women have raped boys, gone to jail, got out, and still sued for child support. The pedophile shouldn't have access to her kids at all yet she managed to get out of jail after raping a minor and still sued him for custody. Women have sper…
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/23 10:53 PM
6

When you engage in those conversations remember the audience is vastly larger than just the person you're talking to. Many others are likely reading. That's who you're trying to reach. Speak to the audience, not the person that's already gone. Its some weird fetishization of misery I call it fear mongering. But this works as well.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/23 10:39 PM
1

People need to recognize that as bad as rape is, spending 10 weeks in jail is worse. Far worse.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/23 10:32 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/ r /antifeminists/comments/zxls0w/gold_diggers_r_us/j2113bb/
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/23 02:48 PM
3

Thanks. It took hours to come up with something so witty. Lmao
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/23 01:03 AM
2

you can't have your own career or earn your own money There was extremely limited times in history when women were not allowed to work. To the point of being negligible to the conversation of overall history of gender roles. I've read records of women being masters in trade guilds as far back as the 1300s. Do you really believe these are equally unfair? Yes. Legally married women could work, any money she made was hers and hers alone. Any taxes owed on her income was for her husband to pay. Men …
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 10:10 PM
2

Good points and lots to unpack. There is still some sexism towards women, although it is all social/cultural and is not upheld in law. I believe this to be true for the part in all western countries. What's left of sexism towards women (and is still there) is the result of what I call societal inertia and will by and large disappear as people age out of the work force, politics, etc. But, I would argue it's more unfair to me, because we are both working but only one of us gets money for our work…
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 05:34 PM
2

Thank you for a respectful reply. No problem. And thank you for the same. I'm happy to answer anything and everything you have to ask, where I'm capable of answering. For the record, I'm not American either, I'm Canadian. But most people here are American and the issues translate to Canada well enough that for these discussions I typically just go with US information. I'm not going to go near the whole "legal paternal surrender" argument, all I can really say on that is that a country where abor…
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 03:27 PM
2

Which is the same as how so many anti-feminists and MRA's genuinely don't understand what feminism is about A fair amount of us, myself included, started out as feminists. But we saw how things are vs how they're portrayed, did some research into the history, looked critically at the movement and state of society, and realized we felt like we had the wool pulled over our eyes by feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 02:17 PM
4

I've been on this sub a long time and see so much shaming of women, Report and downvote those, I do. I'm against feminism, I'm not against women. all this nonsense about feminists being obese with blue hair etc, all the nonsense about them ending up single and bitter with cats, as if there's anything wrong with having cats, Those are childish takes and I call those out as well, or just down vote if they've already been called out. all the tradcon nonsense about men and women having roles they sh…
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 02:14 PM
3

I'm responding to "they" in your comment.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 01:21 PM
5

Very much so
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 01:20 PM
8

And yet even that isn't enough for men to not become legally parents.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 01:20 PM
7

I leave room for these people being simply misinformed. The propaganda machine that is the feminist echo chamber is very real. A lot of feminists genuinely don't realize what we're about or why. They think that incels hate women yet somehow want women and feel entitled to women. They think MRAs and antifeminists are against women's rights. Hell, there's even an / r / againstmensright subreddit that they think is in response to / r / mensrights. A lot of them actually believe those are the opposi…
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 12:40 PM
2

Where did you find this?
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 12:32 PM
4

It's the result of a lifetime of being told they're oppressed from a fear mongering ideology that has grown into an institution.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 11:35 AM
25

Men have zero reproductive rights, so I don't see how that's a barrier only women face.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 04:50 AM
2

I also got banned from there. TooBiased is the most apt description of her I've seen yet. She's a sexist piece of shit
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 10:21 PM
10

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=diabla Spanish for she devil.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 10:09 PM
2

Yup, that's exactly what they are
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 10:00 PM
4

And they say we're the hostile ones.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 06:58 PM
13

Lmao. Reading what he was saying last week he was only here to recruit people into feminism if they hadn't fully realized how toxic it is. It took some time but I was able to pry my eyes from the back of my head after they rolled too far.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 06:14 PM
8

That or and they lose all arguments...
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 04:42 PM
2

Edit: Sorry guys but I have to clamp down. Admins are on my arse again Very understandable. I certainly took no offense.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 02:52 PM
4

That's bigotry. Get that shit out of here.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 02:51 PM
2

Diabla, it's at the top of the pic
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 02:20 PM
3

That is sometimes true, but it still doesn't make them opposites. It's very possible to have sex without paying money for it and to obtain money without providing sex in exchange. Of course! But also sometimes men manipulate women for money and sometimes women manipulate men for sex. And people manipulate others for a variety of other things too. Thinking that men want sex while women want money and that each can exchange with the other for what they want is too binary and simplistic. I was goin…
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 12:19 PM
4

False. Feminists don't promote or defend this. That's good to see. Unfortunately your opinion doesn't represent everyone's, but it is good to see nonetheless. Money and sex are not opposites. Men and women have been exchanging money for sex for millennia. Sometimes men manipulate women for sex. Sometimes women manipulate men for money. It's disgusting, but it's equal opportunity to both sexes. What I don't understand is the people that call the men that are manipulated simps or other derogatory …
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 11:47 AM
9

It is misandry.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 11:33 AM
5

Infinity. It's open source and can be found on f-droid.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 11:20 AM
5

I strongly recommend you do. I reported a few posts, which is apparently the best way.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/22 04:26 AM
15

R Diabla
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 04:22 AM
12

Nah, mate. I didn't go to war with my wife last night. That's a terrible outlook to have.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 03:01 AM
14

Sex is war Well that's disgusting
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 02:34 AM
23

No, I had only heard about it today. I could've gone the rest of my life without seeing that.
/r/AntiFeminists29/12/22 12:05 AM
40

Feminism's dehumanization of men through demonization, apex fallacy, distorting studies to falsely make it seem men are violent, etc. etc. makes subs and topics like that more palatable to the masses. This had lead to a plethora of misandry and hatred toward men. The screen shot is just a recent example.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/22 09:51 PM
-3

Trad con bs. No thanks.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/22 09:20 PM
5

Re: point 1) She is a psychologist, so that makes sense. Re: point 2) Can you give a brief synopsis before I go down the rabbit hole?
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/22 04:36 PM
7

Wholeheartedly agreed. In fact I said a few times in my now removed comment that empathy for both men and women isn't mutually exclusive.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/22 04:01 PM
8

That sub is an echo chamber of hate. At least one of the mods also mods 4th wave women and a few other hate subs. Just a pathetic circlejerk of hatred.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/22 02:12 PM
2

For the record, I'd report that post if it wasn't clearly satire as well. The amount of heinous generalizations the OOP made about men is disgusting and so would that post if it was intended to be real. That said, change every female gendered term and pronoun to feminist and you'd have a mountain of truth.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/22 11:48 AM
9

Blatant misogyny, lol. An anti sexism subreddit promoting sexism is just amazing in the most predictable and pathetic way possible.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/22 11:37 AM
26

Annnnnd, I'm banned. Calling out someone for being sexist in an anti sexism subreddit... Stay classy feminists.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/22 04:51 AM
7

Then why did you respond to it with insults if you don't know what it says? Or, did you read it, realize it goes against your preconceived narrative and couldn't refute it, so you resorted to insults and projections instead? Also, that's a wall of text? What are you, 12?
/r/AntiFeminists26/12/22 03:35 PM
1

I took a look at your post history to get an idea of why you're here. The first post I camcto was this. https://www.reddit.com/ /AskFeminists/comments/vpv1wk/us_feminist_antifeminist_influence/ I'm curious, why do you think anti-feminism means pro-life and feminism means pro choice? There are many pro life feminists and many pro choice anti-feminists. Anti-feminism isn't about being against women's rights, it's about being for equality for ALL. Not just some one sided view of equality where you …
/r/AntiFeminists26/12/22 12:26 PM
1

Or the fact she didn't mention employment anywhere in her list.
/r/AntiFeminists26/12/22 12:03 PM
2

This is it exactly. They lack self esteem and need other esteem to feel good about themselves. It's a red flag, but how red is open for interpretation. I'd say there's still a chance to communicate and get things back on track, but not always.
/r/AntiFeminists26/12/22 11:55 AM
14

As I said "The system was extremely unfair. But it was equally unfair to both sexes, if that makes sense." Nothing you said is wrong, but it's once again only focusing on the advantages men had and the disadvantages women had. Women were treated like children, no argument. They were also protected like children. Men were treated like adults, and had zero protections. Like children, they could be beaten, Could they? Because coveture laws say they couldn't be beaten. Minor physical corrections wer…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/22 11:35 AM
23

it hardly seems fair for them to use historical maltreatment Were women actually mistreated? We always hear about the advantages men had and the disadvantages women had, but what about the opposites. For example, once married women had the right to be provided for by their husband until he died. She literally owned him as a beast of burden if you want to use the feminist analogy of men owning women as chattel. Women could commit crimes and their husbands would be punished for it. The same for ab…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/22 10:44 PM
3

In addition to the comment I made about dehumanization, to add additional fuel to the fire you're lighting I'd suggest the other guy look at in group bias vs out group bias. Women have a much stronger in group bias then men. And an in group bias is likely required to develop in a group in order to get them to see "the others" as the out group.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/22 10:28 PM
4

unless (and maybe i should) i start collecting statements by both racists and feminists so they can be compared side by side. /r/menkampf
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/22 10:24 PM
7

many well meaning people who buy into feminism due to it being the most visible "gender equality movement" Feminism campaigns to the left/equality, but it goveners to the right/supremacy. Which type of feminist you're dealing with is always a gamble. But to be honest, I've yet to find one willing to support something like LPS to give men an equal chance to exercise their parental rights. So I'm not fully convinced any are actually for equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/22 10:18 PM
7

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/201811/the-5-steps-dehumanization They're on step three maybe four, depending on what you're looking at, of dehumanizing men. The analogy to the Nazi dehumanization of Jewish people is apt. Clearly the death toll numbers don't scale but causing hatred through propaganda certainly does.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/22 10:14 PM
4

I got banned from there for saying hating men is sexist and shouldn't be promoted/tolerated. But that's par for the course at this point.
/r/AntiFeminists25/12/22 01:43 PM
1

I saw this posted a couple of days ago and thought it needed it's own post. I originally saw it here: https://www.reddit dot com slash r slash antifeminists/comments/zqtlvq/why_do_women_have_a_greater_chance_of_getting/j0zvk86/ Please give credit to OP for sharing it.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 06:09 PM
3

Don't demonize women.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 04:46 PM
27

How about instead of tearing him down for mistakes he's shown he's aware he made, we congratulate him on bettering himself and attempting to fix those mistakes. No his prior actions aren't a shining beckon of how we should assert boundaries and self care, but he got there in the end and that takes a huge amount of determination when you're coming from that far behind.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 04:29 PM
1

Part 3 The reason I don't say feminist is because those misguided women that Im6 talking about generally are not feminists. They are appropriators and a*holes cloaking themselves in a veneer of something they do not understand. If they did they wouldn't abuse these tenets for foul reasons. This is my biggest issue with this sub, the wholesale conflation of what I'd call feminism appropriating radical misandrists, or FARMs with normal women doing normal feminisim. Here's the thing. Anyone can cal…
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 12:53 PM
1

Part 2 Proven rape or proven false accusations, then sure throw the damn book at them and drag them through the town square. Agreed. But also at the end of the day false rape accusations are exceedingly rare compared to rape and the amount of people who get away with it all the time. There have been studies that place false rape accusations any where from a fraction of a percent of rape accusations all the way up to 50%. All with decently well founded research methods. But the number of cases is…
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 12:44 PM
1

I am aware that it is run by feminists. I'm one of them.... It would be illuminating if you could provide an example of what you mean because I honestly don't see it. I'm not wasting my time trying to convince you of you're own bias. If you're a moderator of that subreddit and aren't aware of the posts you remove and users you ban than there's nothing I can do about it. As for the comparison to horseshoe theory. Well, I am also at a loss here. If a post or comment posted to menslib doesn't suppo…
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 12:15 PM
1

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0jdhMZ8EV58QA7no5eij6rrma1uyqpgahGGmycS15kV4QGiHxuQx9m6u57xEkViESl&id=143732828978842&eav=AfYVG0lYrjXV2LWuXvQE4J83qBASFpaRfUOPVIn6x0U16dP6DxJQoWxxwh_MQTUaotA&paipv=0&_rdr The bill that would mandate shared custody, forcing women to be responsible for half of thier children's financial needs and men to be responsible for half their children's care needs was lobbied against by NOW. As for why they did that, because it's in keeping with feminism's ca…
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 04:00 AM
2

Yes you do. It's right here. This is a joke right? The only reason the MRM exists is because there are men who saw their privilege slip away due to the advancement of feminism and didn't like it. They reacted to women being equal by claiming "we are the ones who are really oppressed". The MRM is the literal embodiment of the saying "to the privileged, equality feels like oppression". Zero empathy for men's issues and dehumanizing them for standing up and asking for help.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 03:50 AM
1

You need to go back and reread everything you said about what I said. I read it. I wrote it after all. I can't tell you what your issue is because it's a bannable phrase around here. My issue is you mis-characterizing what I said. Right from the start you either misunderstood or purposely twisted what I said. And it wasn't a complicated post for someone so seemingly well educated. I've been clear and concise the whole time. When it take asking you three and four times to clarify yourself I think…
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 02:51 AM
1

Despite the friction in our other conversation we are surprisingly similarly aligned in our political thinking. What I don't quote assume I agree with with. I would have to disagree that the generic left has abandon the idea of men's liberation. There's even a sub for that, arrrr slash MensLib. They do a pretty good job of tackling our issues without all the hang ups and anger that I see in other more, canonically "manosphere" aligned communities. Menslib is a feminist sub run by feminists that …
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 11:18 AM
2

Which way do you lean politically and why? Left. The goal of the left is to decrease inequality and bring the majority up. The goal of the right is to maintain the status quo or often times to be regressive. (see private vice public health care for an example) While I understand that change can be bad if not implemented properly, I can't fathom why not wanting to move forward from this present hell scape could ever be considered a good thing. Do you also feel that women have skewed society to th…
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 10:45 AM
2

Lmao, did he have a stroke?
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 10:12 AM
1

Thank you for finally making your point. My position is she wants to be treated fairly and as human... and so do you. That was your version of the point. Same. As. Hers. The difference is no one is treating her unfairly in this situation, meanwhile she has made bigoted remarks against men. And this is like the third time you have deliberately tried to miss my point. Don't assume my motives. You didn't clearly explain yourself until the 4th time. Even now I have a hard time seeing how you made th…
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 10:07 AM
1

Go learn what ad hominem ad hominem hŏm′ə-nĕm″, -nəm adjective Attacking a person's character or motivations rather than a position or argument. I'll not debate somebody that doesn't understand basic debate and logic vocab. 1) I didn't ask you to debate with me, you responded to my comment. 2) If a person doesn't have an education in such topics does that doesn't detract from their points. In fact your stance here would be a violation of good faith debate and another ad hominem. 3) It's you that…
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 03:32 AM
1

Me - "Why do feminists need to make everything a gendered issue and judge all men the same instead of seeing us as humans?" Also me - "I called her and feminists out for treating men as less than human." You - "Uhh, no you didn't." I've very confused. And how is she treating men as less than human? By painting all men as complicit with Musk's actions That's a reach and a half. No it isn't. And I didn't say men, I said a lot of men, AND that this is probably what she is getting at, So there's a f…
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 02:27 AM
1

I called her and feminists out for treating men as less than human. How does that indicate that men see women as less than human?
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 09:31 PM
1

Wow! :'|
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 06:25 PM
1

Musk has been eviscerated in social media for that and many other things. There's literally multiple social media pages dedicated to tracking his jet in real time to show how hypocritical he is about environmental issues.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 11:32 AM
3

Yes.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 11:28 AM
2

Can you imagine if employers could pay women less? Women would be hired over men every time.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 11:27 AM
3

Wasn't it the early 80s? Making it 40 years now?
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 11:25 AM
6

hoping one man reads it, and thinks, “wait a minute, we do run everything.” https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Apex_fallacy https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Council_on_Women_and_Girls 1) The fact that a few men hold the highest positions of power does not mean all men have power. That's an extremely limited and biased view. 2) The men in power don't tend to support men and men's issues, in fact they are generally more inclined to support women and …
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 10:49 AM
2

Pointing out the rates at which women are dying is not “shifting the goal posts,” it’s pointing out your hypocrisy. It shifted the discussion from the much larger issue of IPV to intimate partner homicide. As the latter happens vastly less often and has very different pathology it was a goal post shift. This comment will be deleted imminently but you need to recognize the rate at which you are murdering us and we are not fighting back. I need to recognize the rate that I am murdering? I'm well a…
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 10:29 AM
2

Me? No. But I'm not a moderator and don't make those decisions. The other user was a disingenuous troll who refused to learn though, so I can see why the decision was made to remove their comments.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 10:24 AM
3

Yes. The police can't predict crime. This isn't the Minority Report. But when a crime has been commited and a guy is bloody with wounds he'll still be arrested as the perpetrator. That is blatant discrimination.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 10:20 AM
6

Not just the right to bodily autonomy, Women in the developed world have the right to bodily autonomy. The question around abortion is if the fetus also has that right or not and how to implement if they do. but the right to pursue our careers, uninhibited by men fighting us every step. You also have this right and if you see it being violated I strongly suggest you take action. What about male bodily autonomy though? FGM is rightly illegal, but MGM is legal. And what about men's parental rights…
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 10:17 AM
6

What is this sub? A place to highlight and discuss the terrible actions of feminism. Men murder and rape women every few minutes Men are murdered more often and raped just as often if made to penetrate is included. for no reason and There's always a reason. I don't mean '"because of how s/he dressed" or something stupid. I mean there is going to be a pathology for the injuries that lead the perpetrator to that state of mind where they're so broken they commit heinous acts of violence. Denying th…
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 10:04 AM
4

The suffergists were the group of men and women that fought for all to have the vote. The suffergettes were a terrorist group that used bombings to attempt to get only women the vote and are theorized to be responsible for the delay as authorities didn't want to bow to a terrorist group. Feminism grew from the suffergette movement. Feminism isn't the reason women can vote.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 01:31 AM
6

So women are unable to make their own choices? How sexist are you?
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 12:36 AM
7

Do you actually know anything about the bs you're spouting? Men and women are raped at similar rates. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/men-ipvsvandstalking.html https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062022/
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 12:34 AM
7

You think women are believed abut rape? You know how much feminism it takes for any woman ever to be believed about rape and it’s stil a minority of the time. Yet still more often than men. You’re literally listing a bunch of ways men get out and get to experience the world, the good and the bad, Oh my God, seriously? Dying is a good thing to you? because women are kept at home to be hidden from everything. Source? Who's stopping women from getting out of the home? Lol you’re so brainwashed it’s…
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/22 12:13 AM
5

Your actions speak for you. You've been shown that men are as likely to be abused as women yet you still won't show them compassion. Your goal is to replace those at the top not bring up those at the bottom. And that's just you.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 11:39 PM
2

Another leftist antifeminist here.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 11:26 PM
6

Why is that the yard stick to measure women's value compared to men? Why not suicide rates? Or average life span? Or medical research spending? Or homelessness rates? Or deaths due to violent crime? Or prison sentencing for the same crime? Or education attainment? Or combat deaths? Or work place deaths? Or parental rights? Or voting rights? Or DV shelter rates? Or rape support rates? Or the number of scholarships available? Or discrimination in highering quotas? Or discrimination in family court…
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 11:12 PM
8

Did you even read the study I posted? What’s wrong with hating equality for women? Gee, let me think about that one. Feminism is an ideology built around female supremacy. I don't hate equality for women, I advocate for it, I hate supremacists. So I ask you again, why is it wrong to hate feminism? How can you argue that men are just as much victims when 1) I’ve never met or heard of a single one and Given your dismissal of male victims does that really surprise you? 2) they can overpower women 9…
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 11:01 PM
2

Source?
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:32 PM
8

Women, however, are killed by their male partners at a rate around 10x that of men by women. You're shifting the goal posts - which isn't surprising - but I'll play along. Here's a thought, do you know the rates used to be almost even, but since domestic violence shelters for women started opening the rates of dropped steadily. So even if you can't get past the idea of helping men for men's sake, maybe you could at least see the value in helping male victims of IPV to give them a means to escape…
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:31 PM
6

If a man did that he'd be punished accordingly. Since it was a woman, and feminism has exploited the empathy gap to make women appear even more the perpetual victims and men the perpetual vitcimizer than society already saw them as, she's gotten away with it.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:06 PM
3

Why not equality for everyone? And what even is equality for women? How do you make someone equal without making both equal. Or, if you recognize that, what are women going to give up in order to achieve equality?
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 10:01 PM
12

“Men who have become victims of DV are often ignored”- as are women. Men are just as likely to be victims of IPV, yet you're ignoring the evidence for that. Thank you for proving the point that male victims are ignored more than female victims I have never seen feminists say bad things about male DV, actually I’ve seen quite a lot of awareness grow around it. Feminists ran Erin Pizzey out of her home COUNTRY for trying to get the word out that women are just as violent as men. They escalated to …
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 09:49 PM
4

Yup. And they completely ignore the part where women owned men for the rest of the man's life whereas a woman could end things with a divorce.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 01:36 PM
3

"Men owned women for centuries, it's time they paid the price for their wrong doings."
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 01:15 PM
2

Thank you. And yes, I agree thanks goes to OP for being open minded and asking questions.
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/22 07:49 PM
6

Don't demonize half the population, if you do you're no better than feminists.
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/22 02:12 PM
1

Still not a good take
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/22 02:11 PM
5

Ugh... I knew this conversation would come up here. It's a difficult conversation to introduce because there's a lot of heated feelings around it. I really, really disagree with this. An abortion can be extremely traumatic - at the end of the day, you're ending a potential life - and she shouldn't have to live with that just because he doesn't want a child. Absolutely no one should be able to force a woman to have an abortion or to not have an abortion. That is not what legal paternal surrender …
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/22 12:41 PM
4

I really like this take. I hate that in order to make the point to well you need to break marriage down into an economic contract, but it does work well as a means of explaining the point. I'd also like to add that this view of women 'deserving' alimony after a divorce is a very traditional view that has persisted for centuries, despite feminism. My hypothesis on why it's lasted this long is that its a benefit to women and therefore feminism wants to keep it. But alimony does by and large treat …
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/22 11:54 AM
4

Keeping a roof over your head and food on the table isn't all it takes to be a good husband. What if he's emotionally neglectful? I just want to point out that similar things can be said about women and both would be true. And I only want to add that to bring things back to the center where both men and women can be good or bad or indifferent. 80% of men getting hit with divorces may not be "horrible", but they may not be that great either. Again, those women could be not that great either. In t…
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/22 11:33 AM
5

This guy does not represent all of us. That's some black pill bull shit. There's some some truth sprinkled in, but all of that cheating shit which is the majority of what he wrote is not how I see the world. That guy needs to get outside and talk to some real people.
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/22 11:18 AM
7

Please note that while the members of this subreddit are united in a disdain of feminism as an ideology, we aren't a monolith of ideas on all things gender. Situations like your parents are always tough. In an idealized world your mother would be able to get back into the work force. It shouldn't be up to your father to fund two homes on one income, that's absurd. But I would agree he should support her for a time while she's looking for a job. Maybe that takes the course of her staying in the h…
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/22 11:12 AM
-1

This is trash content. One's as bad as the other.
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/22 10:37 AM
8

There's a subreddit r mankampf
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 03:57 PM
6

I see this shit daily on reddit
/r/AntiFeminists17/12/22 12:56 PM
1

How self centered do you need to be to think 'I have a problem therefore yours doesn't exist'? Why is it so hard for these sexist to understand we both have problems?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/22 03:39 AM
2

same job position and same previous experience That doesn't cover all of the variables. Productivity, hours worked, secondary duties, willingness to commute/travel, risk aversion, requirements for flexible hours... Are all variables that likely also factor in. I make the distinction between clear and unclear, because the unclear pay gap only compares the overall salaries between the sexes, which is definitely not reliable at all. The above said, I really appreciate that you're being critical abo…
/r/AntiFeminists16/12/22 02:22 PM
1

The sort method's available to me are hot, new, rising, top, and controversial. And there aren't pinned posts in any of those. The rest is just you projecting. Once again, I've been nothing but civil here Edit, I just looked at your profile. Are you a fucking lawyer?! And the best argument you can come up with is 'go find the evidence against yourself' followed by anger and attempts at shaming when that fails? This is some of the funniest shit I've seen in a long time. Seriously, thanks for the …
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 07:13 PM
1

There is a ribbon of best of posts that displays at the top of the app version I am using, ? LMAO OK. Again, can you link to something. Not everyone is using the same app. a concept apparently too complicated for you to grasp. It's kinda of impossible to know what I don't know. I've used a few apps for reddit, I've never seen a best of section at the top. But your language is a perfect example of what I’m referencing, asshole You're serious right now aren't you? I'm trying to see what you're tal…
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 06:01 PM
3

The reason there's more women "raped" is because the term "rape" definitionally removes cases of women raping men. If you include women raping men (made to penetrate) the rates are ~even. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4062022/ https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/men-ipvsvandstalking.html
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 01:52 PM
4

Sexual assault, rape, The rates of SA are even between the sexes if the stats include made to penetrate. This isn't new information. And it's illegal. Not sure why you think this is a gender issue more than a people issue. gender pay gap Doesn't exist and would be illegal if it did. and heavy periods Reaching much? Society can't change your biology unless you're willing to undergo surgery to remove the organs responsible for the heavy period.
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 09:56 AM
2

I have no idea what you're referring to. "best of" isn't a sort method. The only comment permanently displayed at the top of this post says "Seems like NotHowGirlsWork is brogading and mass flagging. For the record, I don't give a fuck. Stop getting triggered, your holy whinyness". If you can't find an example just say so, otherwise provide a link.
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 07:46 AM
1

I don't understand the hatred from the LGBTQ+ community towards ace, but I do appreciate your efforts to educate and end that discrimination. (came into your comment history after seeing you post in antifeminism expecting to see another troll. Was pleasantly surprised to see these comments. I reported the other guy for bigotry.)
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 01:38 AM
1

Link?
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 01:18 AM
2

Do posts like that exist on reddit? And not get taken down?
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 01:15 AM
11

If you take it a couple of steps further it's actually consistent. Feminists hate men, therefore demeaning men is fine.
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 01:01 AM
2

There are no pinned posts.
/r/AntiFeminists15/12/22 12:15 AM
0

Women didn't have advantages at that point, not societally or legally. I disagree. Lets look at coveture law. Under coveture women had the right to the fruits of her husbands labour in perpetuity. It didn't matter if she worked or not, it didn't matter if he divorced her, it didn't even matter if she was abusive to him, she had a right to be provided for until he died. Furthermore, if a woman choose to divorce her husband she had a right to return to her father's home and provision. Also, men we…
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 05:46 PM
0

men are killed by other men. not sure what your point is there. First off, that's victim blaming. Secondly, what difference does it make who does the killing? Men are being targeted vastly more often. “1 in 6-7 and 1-4 women will be a victim of domestic abuse in their lifetimes. 26% of reported domestic abuse events were against men.” literally every single study i found on google says you’re wrong. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender…
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 05:33 PM
0

You're still only talking about bringing women up where men had advantages. Where has feminism attempted to bring men up where women have advantages?
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 05:01 PM
2

I disagree on the waste of time aspect. There's always the hope that in a space like this others will see how ridiculous and sexist they are and it might open their eyes a little. But yeah other than that everything you said is spot on.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 04:59 PM
2

there is overwhelming evidence that sub absolutely hates women. Citation needed
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 04:32 PM
0

Kk
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 11:18 AM
1

I was supporting your point, not disagreeing with it.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 10:32 AM
2

women are significantly more likely to be killed simply by walking in the street (for being women), more likely to be sex trafficked, more likely to be domestically abused, more likely to be killed for their sex, etc. None of that shows an inequality in rights. Rape, sex trafficking, IPV and murder are all illegal. Men are murdered about 4 times more often than women. The rates of IPV are even and that fact has been shown over and over again for about 40 years. As far as I know women and girls d…
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 10:00 AM
2

Why would you only put your name on the deed? If one person works to raise the capital for the materials and the other works to raise the building they both worked to make the home, they should both own it. The same argument you made could be made against men in traditional marriages. If he works and she's a sahm and they get divorced, she put in all of the work and therefore, according to your argument, he shouldn't have any access to his children. Similarly, she's going to do all of the work t…
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 09:41 AM
1

the actual point of feminism and the ideology behind it is equality for men and women. Can you demonstrate that? Feminists expected men to make changes so women could gain the benefits the traditional ways gave to men. But what benefits did feminism expect women to share with men?
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 09:23 AM
2

You didn't list any of the privileges women had during the first wave...?
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 09:19 AM
1

Just the difference in stage of life would make that relationship untenable. The older one has likely settled into a groove in their life. They're on top of most things having climbed the learning curves and are setting their sights higher. That could be retirement planning maybe a career more, etc. The younger one is at the beginning of their life full of wonder and feeling things out. The older person watching the younger person climb all of those learning curves would probably feel more like …
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 09:13 AM
4

1) OP is making false statements. Warning to OP, making false statements about others is similar to slander. 2) OP is unsuccessful in pointing out contradictions in anti-feminism because they are uneducated in what anti-feminism is. There's no irony. OP thinks being anti-feminist is being against women having equal rights. That shows OP doesn't understand. I started off by warning them their misinformed opinion and prejudice could lead to negative reactions. Then explained why they have been uns…
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 08:58 AM
2

Slander is spoken. slanderous adjective Given or disposed to slander, What they typed is akin to slander, it indicates that they are disoped to slander. You’re not convincing anyone that you have anything to flex... Didn't think I'd need to break it down further but here we are. OP is uneducated in what anti-feminism is and is not. Which is why they are unsuccessful in pointing out contradictions.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 08:35 AM
1

Did I use big words and logic? Did your education leave to ill prepared to use the scientific method?
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 12:05 AM
2

Still projecting? Run out of other insults? I'm still waiting for you to make even a half hearted attempt to defend.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 12:02 AM
2

Your article is an opinion piece on a research paper that shows a correlation between anti-feminism and dark triad in self reported individuals. Three hundred and forty-three participants completed self-report measures of the Dark Triad and feminist attitudes. Meaning the researchers didn't study anti-feminists overall, they cherry picked dark triad individuals. This shows us absolutely nothing relevant to what we were discussing above or to anti-feminism at large. Try again. This time with rese…
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 11:58 PM
2

Lmao. You're projecting.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 11:52 PM
1

1) don't make false claims about others. It's slanderous. 2) you're unsuccessful because you're uneducated.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 11:46 PM
2

You stopped when I refuted your points and you couldn't defend.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 11:44 PM
2

How's that working out for you? So far all I'm seeing is you failing miserably.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 10:47 PM
2

Just more time wasting while you try to think up an actual way to refute my above points. And now you're trying to shame me for proper research. Typical feminist.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 10:46 PM
3

Why are you here then?
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 10:39 PM
2

Vetting others research is a part of science and the scientific method. It would be illogical and unreasonable to just accept everything at face value. You've made no attempt to refute what I've said above and it's very evident that you are unable to.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 10:31 PM
2

Done? You haven't even started. Let's recap this conversation so far You - women do the majority of household work and get paid less for the same work at work Me - The wage gap is a myth that's been debunked and the studies on household chores don't account for sufficient variables to make any claims from You - hur dur you don't believe in science Repeat ad nauseam. So, can you use logic and reason? Can you show a study that takes into account sufficient variables to show women do more work over…
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 08:48 PM
1

😬 this sounds just like those who said there was a microchip in the vaccine That's an ad hominem. Try again. I’m gonna have to call it with this “argument”. You can’t use logic and reason with those who cherry pick what they want to believe, and ignore the vast majority of science. At one time the vast majority of science said the earth was the centre of the universe. Scientific method includes updating your model when presented with new information. I started out as a feminist, but learned that…
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 08:25 PM
1

They're both from the same person talking about the bias in research around gender issues.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 06:21 PM
3

Science is real. Research, though, can be heavily biased and every study I've seen that shows what you're saying has been heavily biased. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233717660_Thirty_Years_of_Denying_the_Evidence_on_Gender_Symmetry_in_Partner_Violence_Implications_for_Prevention_and_Treatment https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cb4YbJQ9mXs
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 06:05 PM
3

Yes there are a plethora of biased studies.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 04:09 PM
2

Lol, that's exactly what I'm doing. Although I do 85% of the cooking, she does one meal a week. Our division of labour is something we discuss frequently to make sure each other feels cared for and that it's an even split. Edit, I just looked at your post history, you're 17-18 years old. Honey, why don't you sit this one out. The adults are talking right now.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 09:39 AM
4

I think the issue is that household chores were always seen as women's work, but now that most women work in paid jobs it's unfair when her male partner still considers it as the woman's work. The ridiculous part of this is that it gets fuck tons of media attention to the point that most people believe it's true. But what doesn't get media attention? Think for a second. What about this topic doesn't get media attention? Men's work. Traditional/stereotypical men work doesn't get mentioned in any …
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 02:00 AM
11

Because being a mother is the hardest job in the world. Can't you see, getting the kids ready to go to school, packing their lunches and then doing a load of dishes in the 7 hours the kids are gone is the hardest job ever. Way worse than driving a truck for 12 hours straight, or slooping tar around a road in sweltering heat, or working the oil fields in northern Alberta for three weeks straight of 12 hour days... Oh yeah, I forgot the eMoTiOnAl LaBoUr. FML. Like men don't also have stress in the…
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 01:48 AM
5

A myth. There is no wage gap, that's illegal. There is a small earnings gap when taking averages but when you drill down into hours worked, productivity, willingness to commute, etc., etc., etc., there is no overall earnings gap. Though, due to the number of women versus men graduating university single women in their thirty living in cities make (last I checked) 9% more than the male counterparts. And the only study I've seen on household chores that actually includes the stereotypical male cho…
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 01:41 AM
1

My post wasn't intended to say they were completely wrong, only that they weren't telling the whole story.
/r/Male_Studies11/12/22 01:57 AM
1

That's not entirely true. IIRC external ejaculation became a thing in porn when the AIDS scare caused the porn industry to need a way to make men's orgasms less risky to the actresses.
/r/Male_Studies10/12/22 11:39 PM
1

:( ok
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/22 09:45 AM
7

Feminists need women to be seen as the victim in order to maintain their strangle hold on the empathy gap in order for feminism to be seen as a force for good.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/22 05:33 PM
7

Hopefully it's ok to post a direct link to this subreddit, but let me know if it's not allowed and I'll repost.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/22 12:58 PM
4

Np
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/22 12:54 PM
19

"Being raped is a million times worse than being falsely accused of rape." False accusations have killed innocent people. Short of that is the ostracising which can be extremely damaging to a person's mental and financial health, and ultimately thier physical health. Being raped is bad, no question at all. But to say it's a million times worse than something that can cause depression so severe it leads to suicide just shows the OOP is sexist, they clearly have no sympathy for men's suffering and…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/22 03:07 AM
17

Way to go, you managed to completely misunderstand my point. I never said women don't have any influence on society Women didn't have any way to actually influence society in a significant way up until the 70's or so, ??? https://duckduckgo.com/?q=contradiction+definition&t=fpas&ia=definition but we are talking about men's issues, which historically, were caused by men. You're wrong. Historically men's issues were caused by men and women, as in, by society. Just like women's issues were caused b…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/22 07:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter