TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

adam-l Archive

View 89 posts and 1,967 comments by adam-l on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
564

Red Pill Exampleadam-l/r/TheRedPill21/02/21 02:58 PM
325

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill22/09/19 04:51 AM
262

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 09:00 PM
223

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill07/01/19 10:43 AM
160

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill06/08/19 02:39 PM
155

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill08/10/16 06:30 PM
140

Social Issuesadam-l/r/MensRights31/07/15 07:04 AM
124

Social Issuesadam-l/r/MensRights26/12/18 10:38 AM
117

Married Red Pilladam-l/r/TheRedPill04/02/20 08:53 AM
88

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill23/05/21 08:42 AM
82

adam-l/r/MGTOW29/08/16 05:55 AM
82

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill28/06/19 12:00 AM
79

resourceadam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/21 12:45 PM
78

Scienceadam-l/r/TheRedPill30/12/23 08:54 PM
74

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill22/02/24 11:08 AM
69

Building Poweradam-l/r/TheRedPill02/08/21 05:39 AM
67

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill12/10/18 05:12 PM
63

discussionadam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/21 12:58 PM
57

Cultureadam-l/r/TheRedPill31/08/19 05:59 PM
56

Feminismadam-l/r/MensRights09/06/25 07:47 AM
55

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 10:16 PM
41

Rant/Ventingadam-l/r/TheRedPill22/11/15 11:49 PM
39

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill17/01/16 07:56 PM
37

adam-l/r/MGTOW01/08/15 05:55 PM
36

adam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/20 09:41 AM
36

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill04/02/17 09:15 AM
35

Scienceadam-l/r/TheRedPill15/08/16 07:20 AM
35

resourceadam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/21 05:00 AM
34

masculinityadam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/21 01:02 PM
31

Social Issuesadam-l/r/MensRights03/06/15 02:02 PM
24

Questionadam-l/r/MensRights14/03/15 10:19 PM
24

adam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/20 07:34 AM
23

Feminismadam-l/r/MensRights02/11/15 07:27 AM
22

educationadam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/21 01:03 PM
21

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 05:53 AM
20

Social Issuesadam-l/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:47 AM
19

Social Issuesadam-l/r/MensRights09/02/17 10:27 PM
18

mental healthadam-l/r/MensRights07/03/26 05:28 AM
15

adam-l/r/MarriedRedPill28/10/15 08:08 PM
13

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill09/11/15 09:03 PM
13

Generaladam-l/r/MensRights21/08/16 10:44 PM
11

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 08:52 AM
11

adam-l/r/MGTOW01/10/18 08:40 PM
11

Questionsadam-l/r/MensRights16/12/15 02:43 PM
10

adam-l/r/MGTOW17/07/15 12:35 PM
10

Generaladam-l/r/MensRights18/07/15 12:46 PM
10

Mod Announcementadam-l/r/Male_Studies18/05/21 12:08 PM
10

Cultureadam-l/r/TheRedPill05/11/17 01:01 PM
9

Feminismadam-l/r/MensRights12/07/21 07:21 AM
9

Discriminationadam-l/r/MensRights07/10/20 05:05 PM
9

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 08:58 AM
8

Social Issuesadam-l/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:36 PM
8

adam-l/r/MGTOW31/07/15 02:53 PM
8

Social Issuesadam-l/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:47 AM
7

mediaadam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/21 08:32 PM
7

Healthadam-l/r/MensRights14/07/21 05:03 AM
6

adam-l/r/MensRights18/10/16 08:55 PM
6

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill19/06/16 07:32 AM
5

adam-l/r/MGTOW23/08/16 08:39 PM
5

resourceadam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/21 04:59 AM
5

Generaladam-l/r/MensRights17/07/15 11:25 AM
5

Social Issuesadam-l/r/MensRights20/07/15 11:41 AM
4

adam-l/r/MGTOW07/10/15 09:05 AM
4

Generaladam-l/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:10 PM
4

social issuesadam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/21 10:15 AM
3

Discriminationadam-l/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:11 PM
3

adam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/20 09:33 PM
2

Activism/Supportadam-l/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:42 PM
2

adam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/21 02:20 PM
2

adam-l/r/MGTOW28/07/15 10:41 PM
2

Legal Rightsadam-l/r/MensRights04/12/21 02:55 PM
2

Social Issuesadam-l/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:24 AM
1

adam-l/r/seduction17/07/15 11:48 AM
1

Cultureadam-l/r/TheRedPill24/08/22 08:00 AM
1

sexualityadam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/21 09:21 PM
0

Social Issuesadam-l/r/MensRights18/07/15 10:02 PM
0

adam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/20 06:50 PM
0

adam-l/r/MGTOW04/06/15 03:53 AM
0

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill25/08/16 08:52 PM
0

adam-l/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/20 08:23 PM
0

Generaladam-l/r/MensRights05/03/16 08:29 AM
0

Social Issuesadam-l/r/MensRights21/07/15 03:21 PM
0

Anti-Feminismadam-l/r/AntiFeminists24/08/22 08:03 AM
0

Activism/Supportadam-l/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:57 AM
0

Edu./Occu.adam-l/r/MensRights18/05/26 12:00 PM
0

Cultureadam-l/r/TheRedPill15/04/20 04:46 PM
0

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill02/07/20 12:34 PM
0

Scienceadam-l/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 11:38 AM
0

Red Pill Theoryadam-l/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 03:54 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,967 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Let me try to give an answer as a psychologist. There is psychopathy as a clinical diagnosis, e.g. in the DSM-V it's called "ASPD, AntiSocial Personality Disorder". And then there is a psychopathic "mode", present in all of us. A mode is "an integrated network of cognitive, emotional, motivational, and behavioral schemas designed to respond to specific environmental demands." It's normal to activate this mode e.g. in cases when we are wronged and threatened. It's effective in fighting our enemie…
/r/MensRights21/07/26 12:58 PM
4

there is always something she can do to fuck it up: She might be borderline, and the good behavior you are witnessing is the bait, only to be retracted once you're hooked and ready to feast on.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/26 04:32 PM
-2

The Red Pill's "grandfather" is Rollo Tomassi. You should read him for the original Red Pill content, not the wannabes that Theroux sought in order to discredit it. Also, read the Endorsed Contributors on The Red Pill sub. These people have pioneered a male-friendly reading of gender and sexual dynamics. If they are skewed to the Right that's because the Left has been almost completely coopted by Capitalism, and turned from supporters of the working class into unthinking proponents of female pow…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 06:41 AM
-1

Isn't that the idea of liberalism? Men dying to support the freedom of woman to sleep with whomever else she wants? /s
/r/MensRights01/07/26 05:57 AM
2

You mention Esther Vilar and then say The only way marriage can ever work is you’d have to marry a traditional woman who sees men as fundamentally human beings like herself. Wtf? Vilar wrote her book when the majority of women were still traditionalist. It specifically declares that women, not especially feminists, don't view men as human beings. It's directed mainly against the traditionalists. Women getting alimony, the house and the children is not a product of feminism, it's what has happene…
/r/MarriedRedPill29/06/26 02:54 PM
11

Misandry is a tool of the elite. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5t3c04/antiwhite_racism_as_a_tool_of_the_elite/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 01:11 PM
2

LoL. Sociology. Rip on Esther Vilar and Warren Farrell. It computes. Sociology lost the Evolutionary Psychology revolution, and, just as contemporary "marxism", has become irrelevant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/26 06:13 AM
23

Did it occur to you yesterday? The manosphere has been around for decades. I would say at least since Esther Vilar, a Marxist, wrote The Manipulated Man in the 70s. Ernest Belfort Bax, also a socialist, wrote The Legal Subjugation of Man in 1908, although I believe there wasn't much of a male movement back then, probably because without the anonymity of the internet the harassment for men who participated would be too great. It's disheartening seeing the mainstream smear campaign against the man…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/26 06:56 PM
1

Try to give them a bit of plausible deniability. A direct "no" is a hit to their self-esteem. It does feel good (for us), but leads to them acting the way you describe. "I'm focusing on (this irrelevant thing) right now, and it takes up all of my time and energy" works much better with females than "No".
/r/MensRights22/06/26 04:36 AM
5

They sure take their role as Guardians of the Entrance to Sex very seriously. Children with dynamite...
/r/MensRights18/06/26 11:19 PM
6

That's definitely where the mainstream heads. I cannot predict what will be Reddit's move, but it's possible.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 03:24 AM
29

When Reddit banned the MGTOW sub and quarantined The Red Pill, there were guys here in Men's Rights that cheered, thinking they could promote a "responsible", "truly gender equal" narrative around the sexes. I was warning that MGTOW and TRP were the first to go, and that the Manosphere in general would be targeted next. We are there now. You can't negotiate with psychopaths. They only understand the language of power.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 03:11 PM
8

Let me translate the womanese: "Now that society gives me a free ride as a woman, I can finally focus only on the most desirable males, and make it an obligation of the system to rid me of the attention of the undesirable ones".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 08:13 AM
3

I've read Self Made Man. It's an interesting viewpoint, seeing things that are taken for granted in male spaces presented as revolutionary disclosures. It's valuable as testament of her experience, of a female in a man's shoes. There's not much in there that the men's rights movement hasn't talked about, but of course, for the general public, when a woman says it it's something else. She's brave and honest. The books itself is a bit bleak to read. Not anything particular, but the general mood is…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 06:33 AM
3

Based.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/26 07:02 PM
6

A left wing male advocate is left wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/26 08:31 PM
35

You're too late, mate. Only women are allowed to be feminists, nowadays. As a man, you can only be an "ally" now. Which means you can parrot whatever is the current woke fad, but you cannot have an opinion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 05:40 AM
4

Part of the reason is evolutionary. Women used to be inferior to men in ancestral hunter-gatherer bands, and the strength difference between the sexes attests to that. So, they evolved a taste for power and status. They just can't resist any chance to get it, even if it's only fleeting and circumstantial, just as a kid can't pass on a sugary treat. If it's especially pronounced in your case, you might be giving "weak" vives. If you put on some muscle become more intimidating, they'll do it less.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 03:30 AM
11

There's a dark part in the female psyche, and there are tells throught history. German women not fighting during WWI probably played a major role in females voting Hitler into office. Current data in Ukraine (there was a post a while back, numbers I give are from memory, don't quote them), women are about 1% of fighting casualties while 20% of the officers (!) It's just like PR in business: others are doing the hard work, and females are used by the management as prods.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 01:20 AM
65

Funny how this woman can only correlate the "toxic" label with men. No, woman, strong female characters are just toxic women.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 02:26 AM
5

I feel like she stole away her cute youthfulness from me. Typical. It's the, for lack of a fitter word, shit-pleasure. Deriving pleasure from status. "See how ugly I am, and I still get to have a serf servicing me and asking things from me. Ain't I great?". It's a place that good men find themselves in, because women with some disorder will use the kids as an excuse to lock a victim in and use him as a target for their covert aggression.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 03:52 AM
3

Thanks for this well written review.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/26 09:02 PM
5

The irony is that "traditionalist" women are just the other side of female supremacy: "we don't need to work, you have to provide for us".
/r/MensRights19/05/26 11:04 AM
-1

Haven't heard about the particular experiment. Do you have any links?
/r/MensRights19/05/26 12:55 AM
26

Spot on!
/r/MensRights18/05/26 11:39 PM
1

Man, if I could provide all that in a post, I would be a billionaire! :) It takes effort and time to get there.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 03:40 PM
1

You are almost there, but you probably lack the evolutionary framework in order to grasp it. For a man to be attractive, he has to do all that you describe while being in System 1. That's why women hate pick-up artists: the legit ones teach men how to navigate women's attraction circuits, pass shit tests etc, something that in the ancestral setting where female attraction evolved was supposed to accurately indicate the man's value as a mate, without the need to be taught. Incidentally, that's wh…
/r/MensRights18/05/26 02:58 PM
1

Checkout "Gloria counselling" on YouTube. It's a revealing case where the most renowned psychologists of the time, Carl Rogers, Albert Ellis and Fritz Perls have a session each with a woman who leaves her husband. At the very beginning, and never again, she says that she's leaving her husband in order to pursue "a specific kind of man" (and she is supposedly worried about the effect this will have on her daughter). Men generally have a notion of entering and leaving their flow state. They are th…
/r/MensRights18/05/26 01:52 PM
1

Thanks for reading my post. It's not indented to solve the whole attractiveness issue for men, of course. Other factors such as looks and status certainly play a role. I'm pinpointing a single issue: how a man's psychic state influences his perceived attractiveness by females. I hope it's clear enough.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 12:56 PM
-1

If you read my post carefully, you'll see that I support that there mostly aren't "Alpha" and "Beta" men - that's also why I put the terms in quotes.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 12:53 PM
0

Your writing style is exhaustingly obnoxious. your nebulous BS You seem pretty ignorant (in addition to rude), so I won't try to answer you specifically, you wouldn't be able to follow. In any case, for anyone following the conversation, you can check out Evolutionary psychologist Laura Betzig's groundbreaking 1986 book titled Despotism and Differential Reproduction: A Darwinian View of History.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/26 03:48 PM
0

Seems your answer isn't very constructive, just FUD spreading. Why do you have your comments hidden? We can't see who you are, or if you are writing this in good-faith or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/26 02:14 PM
-1

It's very simple. For example, you round up all the women, put them in rich men's harrems, then promise the celibate men 40 virgins in heaven, if they die in a holy war. Or, use the state as a surrogate husband, providing for women through policies that promote their employement and welfare over men, culturally legalize their right to have kids out of wedlock, bully social scientists to hide the detrimental effects of single motherhood to kids, produce cultural artefacts (movies) that promise wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/26 01:14 PM
1

If you read Rollo Tomassi, the redpiller, or The Nice Giy, the MGTOW, you'll rralize that they grrw up in gynocentric families too. They had to either submit and accept their inferrior, subservient position, or rebel against it. Sometimes, women leave absolutely no middle ground: that would question their self-righteousness and threaten to expose their bullying ways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/26 03:55 AM
18

Don't forget sexlessness: you've got to have the males enraged in order to go to war.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/26 11:54 AM
1

One thing is "forever love". There is such a thing, and this is how it's done: One of the partners idealizes the other, and that has deep implications in that they don't only "oversee" their partner's shortcomings, they don't even see them. Their very perception is hijacked. Basically, it's a stuck "in love" feeling. Then, the other partner gets the same thing. Then, there is no bad turn of fortune on their way, so that they can manage, and even thrive, despide their shortcomings. It works bette…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/26 09:36 AM
10

How do we reconcile wanting kids with that though? We don't. For some problems there simply is no solution. Or, to put it otherwise, sometimes the risk is too big.
/r/MensRights10/05/26 05:03 PM
2

Of course there is the manosphere, and it is the only glimmer of hope in this insanely misandrist world. No wonder they try to smear it. You too should be proud you're in it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/26 10:37 AM
2

Kind of. It's an interesting way to put it, but I believe that it's natural for women to have "the One", while for men it's psychopathological. A man can have a "one", but he can concurrently have others, and can replace that one with another.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/26 01:35 AM
31

There are different cases of oneitis, and various reasons. There's the classic one, caused by prolonged scarcity. Spend a decade or so pickled in sexlessness, and you can't imagine losing the first woman that takes your D and releases you from the sexless hell. Then, there's the guy who has been terrified systematically by his unsatisfiable mother. He's been made her carer, her provider, her narcissistic supply ever since he remembers himself, even earlier. When he partners with a woman, she tak…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/26 04:09 PM
3

There are two levels of life passions: those that give you short- or mid- term satisfaction, and one long-term one, that gives you meaning. If you're struggling with long-term perspectives in general, you'd find it harder to stick to one of the latter, so that's one thing to have in mind. Some men have the persuit of wealth as their long-term perspective. For others, this feels shallow - or, simply, unattainable. Quite often, long-term purposes have to do with the community. They revolve around …
/r/TheRedPill30/03/26 03:29 AM
2

Most of my teachers was female actually. There was no issue whatsoever. That's because women used to defer to men. The principal was a man, fathers had authority, etc. Women operated (unless they were completely nuts) In The Name of the Father. That's what gave them structure and enabled them to participate in civilization.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 07:56 AM
4

You know what? Shit fluctuates. "This too shall pass". And you'll once more be proud of yourself that you've maintained the route you purposefully chose.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/26 07:25 AM
1

Sometimes people become an incarnation of their mother's desire
/r/MensRights16/03/26 02:31 PM
14

Men are individuals, they have a core which interacts with the world, both the physical and the social. Women are dispersed in their relations, so much so that these constitute their whole "being". There's no "self-reliance" in women, because the notion of a "self" is so wobbly. They adjust to the world, they do not shape or define it. That's why they are the perfect propaganda victims, as in fashion or wokeism.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/26 06:53 AM
3

You have to separate your daily life from the bigger picture. It kind of means you have to live two lives. That's the cost you have to pay, if you want to both keep a connection with the social reality, and live a livable life. Set some time of the day aside, before or after which you forbid yourself to think into the situation of men in this world.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 12:45 AM
-3

Obey already implies unquestioning acceptance. So, are you willing to have a wife that questions your every decision? How old are you?
/r/MensRights12/03/26 02:12 PM
27

You are generally right. However, because these processes are unconscious, they never get logically resolved, hence the confusion. A woman essentially wants just one thing: more. If she has partenered with a provider type man, she will seek a more tingle-inducing one - because she wants more. And if she has partenered with a high--adrenaline one, she will try to "tame" all his energy into providing for her, otherwise she will burn out - and seek the comfort of a provider man, only to be unsatisf…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 10:53 AM
8

Most simps are OK guys until the issue of m'lady comes up. Just don't talk about women with simps, or just nod.
/r/MarriedRedPill22/02/26 12:58 PM
5

What you need to sacrifice in order to get out of this situation in one piece is your love for her. You are on your own, and she is your rival and will always be, even if things "get better". As it is now, she stands to gain more by divorcing you than by staying with you: the house, alimony, child support. It's brutal, yes. Even if this marriage is not salvageable, your life, and a life for your kids, is. You have to learn about female nature post festum. Do the work. There is hope.
/r/MarriedRedPill21/02/26 06:49 PM
2

While the physical health of your mother is something you can care for, trying to deal with her mental health will burn you out. It'sher responsibility to entertain yourself. Free up some time of yours, and, most importantly, take some responsibility off your shoulders.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 07:06 AM
1

The really bad scenario would be to find out that your loving wife is essentially dependent on her mother and can't leave her. That's what it looks like, from your description. In any case, you need to consider moving out, and try to provide a healthy living environment to your child rather than "save for a house".
/r/MensRights17/02/26 02:29 AM
4

If I may suggest my book, https://theempressisnaked.wordpress.com/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/26 01:22 PM
8

Agreed. Btw, Gemini thinks this video is most probably ai-generated. Voice, script and all.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/26 09:06 AM
6

He could write a paragraph, and that would be best since he would describe it through his viewing lense, hopefully a red pill one. Alternatively, feed it to Gimini and have it summarized for you on the spot.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/26 07:55 AM
12

I felt it made her uncomfortable. You could charge her a reasonable price in order to explore her uncomfortableness together...
/r/MensRights28/01/26 09:25 PM
86

She might be alright for a few of your issues, but when things get to sexuality, shit will hit the fan. It's like having a Nazi pathologist. He can treat your flu, all right, but after you tell him you are a Gypsy, can you trust the medicine he gives you?
/r/MensRights28/01/26 05:07 PM
9

neurosexist gender essentialism, including the unfalsifiable notion that one can be born with a gendered brain or soul. It's not "unfalsifiable". You can brain scan them, and prove it's a fact. Which has been the case. Blank-slatism is what has destroyed the Left.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/26 05:45 AM
9

It's unethical. Kids absolutely need to have a father.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 09:14 PM
0

You are asking the wrong question to begin with. The celebration of empathy is itself a hallmark of a feminized society. Empathy is problematic because it is instinctive and biased, just like tribalism or nationalism. "Rational compassion" is the male counterpart. Read the book Against Empathy by psychologist Paul Bloom.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 05:38 PM
20

You are trying to unpack feminist effluvia using logic. Imagine having an utter enemy, the personification of vileness, a case lost for the human race. That's the hatred with which feminists attack men, and they feel such a righteous rage that reserve no inkling of human sympathy for them.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 09:35 AM
1

Even progressives (e.g. Bentham) believed that women are simply dumber and can never really compete with men. That's the first time I see this view. Source?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/25 04:14 AM
5

Have you read my book, The empress is naked? No need to do all the research by yourself...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 10:45 AM
5

Two sides of the same coin, indeed. And that coin's name is the female sexual strategy. Traditionalism centers around the "man as a provider for her and her offspring" side, while feminism centers around the "as a woman, I'm forever free to shop around for the best genes" side. In today's society, when women have been deified by neoliberal capitalism, women can have it both ways: secure a man's provision, enforced by the state through alimony, child support, taxation etc, while being "sexually l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/25 08:28 AM
3

If you read a '70s liberal, such as e.g. Herb Goldberg in The Hazzards of Being Male, you realize that there is such a thing as a true liberal. And then you have what Malcom X said about "liberals", those that are like conservatives just more hypocritical. There's a precious little book called Political Ponerology by a Polish psychiatrist, Andrzej Łobaczewski, who survived the Stalinist regime to research and write it. He concluded that any ideology starts and inspires people with honest intenti…
/r/MensRights28/12/25 12:37 AM
4

if you ever get a real chance to leave, take it and don’t look back. I was reading about France, being something like the top country where people want to leave. About 25% of them. It's the same all over. Turning into a worldwide shitshow. The system prioritizing "gender issues" while it takes away the people's capacity to live a life worth living.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 08:58 PM
13

This issue affects older women as well. No, it doesn't. An "older woman" is still not a man, not even an older one. Older autistic women still don't have the social handicaps of older autistic men. I guess you're just iterating another version of "men killed in wars, women most affected".
/r/MensRights22/12/25 03:10 AM
2

https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1pnt1bk/fascinating_harvard_study_said_a_lot_about_life/ Check out this too
/r/MensRights20/12/25 04:54 AM
6

This goddamit! It's time to remember Schopenhauer's definition of the tasks that women are capable of, and stick to them.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 07:40 AM
3

What I'm refusing to get is why would you want a crazy woman to be the mother of your child in the first place.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 02:19 PM
1

Man, why would you want to have a baby with a woman who doesn't want it? Women are known to drive unwanted children crazy. Abortion is way better, a no brainer in these cases.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 05:02 AM
11

Woman is made into a religion nowadays. Who can accept their own God(dess) being questioned?
/r/MensRights12/12/25 05:17 AM
1

Yeah, once your own mother abuses you, you end up actively seeking out the abuse, so that you have a second chance to process it. These are troubled individuals, and it's no wonder the woke propaganda is stronger in them. We can agree that those abusive lesbians are the greatest victims, but we'll disagree whose victims they are.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 09:39 PM
3

Nah. They are lesbians. The violence is because they were abused by their mothers.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 06:59 PM
6

It's quite accurate for paranoid women, that's for sure.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 08:59 PM
0

only didn't due to divine intervention and being told that it was not another man's baby but a divine pregnancy. That's about what these priests are trying to emulate.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 02:33 AM
27

Not married men are three categories: Underprivileged men. They tend to have worse health overall. Divorced men! Divorce tends to take away quite a few years from your life. Men that were eligible, but wise enough not to marry. These are a small minority, and can't statistically make up for the previous two.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 08:54 PM
3

That's because the two sexes have been made by nature to complement each other. There are things found in one sex that corresponds to the other sex, one obvious example being a woman carrying a man's child: the progeny of the man resides inside the woman. Another example is the limit on what a woman wants. This, resides inside the man, and without it she is left wanting ever more.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 02:02 PM
6

"Feminism is the radical idea that women are adults" is not one.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 10:12 PM
1

Do you let them take a place in the male toilet line, or do you go past them?
/r/MensRights08/11/25 08:40 PM
19

Women generally do cover eachother, but we cannot know if that's the case in your story. The info needed to reach a conclusion is not easy to come out in a sub. If you don't fully trust your female therapists, try a male one - and spend the time necessary to vet him.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 08:11 PM
4

Thanks for the heads up. I'll look into the info you provide. There are social inputs to the human biological processes (stress and anxiety being the most obvious example), so the quest for a "fundamental" biological basis, irrespective of the social environment, is always treacherous - and neverending.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 03:12 PM
24

Regarding life expectancy, the advantage of women is a quite recent phenomenon, dating only a couple of centuries. Men had a higher life expectancy during the bulk of human existence. It's only due to contemporary gynocentrism that women's higher life expectancy is consider normal. I go into detail in my book, The Empress Is Naked.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 06:06 AM
34

There is this big study in Norway, that shows very limited difference (still in favor of women) in the top 1%. It's even less in the top 0.1%, but I don't remember the source, and such data is difficult to find. The trend is there, though, and one can interpolate.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 05:24 AM
52

Strange that there's no difference in life expectency between the sexes in rich people, then.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 04:03 AM
8

It probably has to do with civilization in general. Civilization tends to solve women's problems, and because women need some tension (drama) in their lives to feel alive, they go about and create strife themselves. The mating system is a prime example. Rules on who mates with whom solved a major problem faced by our hominid female ancestors, i.e. inbreeding. Nevertheless, women still go about seeking and fucking strangers, "to feel alive", i.e. to utilize an evolved instinct which is in the cor…
/r/MensRights27/10/25 08:59 AM
-2

You are being very perceptive. Unfortunately, what you describe is exactly what is the nature of love: something that man gives and woman takes. Man is the giver, woman is the taker. This is not a "narrative ", it's not a "social construction". It harks back to our ancestral evolutionary pressures, when women gave birth and raised a child who carried 50% of another human being's DNA. That was her "giving" part, it was a biological one, for which man had to pay in material, emotional and all othe…
/r/MensRights22/10/25 04:13 AM
3

Highly readable, informative, solid RP. I liked it.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/25 05:06 AM
4

Your weakness is seeking acknowledgement from your wife. They can't do that, they were built to consume. It's evolutionary, they were made this way long before marriage was instituted for their safety, and haven't, as a species, had the time to adjust. So try not to take it personally. The thing is, you don't mention any kids. If that's the case, living with a nagging wife for the rest of your life might not be your best option. It's highly unlikely she'll change. You have to change, and whether…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 04:07 AM
1

Their diet lacked meat, so they ate their subjects. Ideology came afterwards as a rationalization.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 03:34 AM
5

This is not a new thing. Remember that fabricated story about the dildo being "the first electric device"? It even made it into PhDs, e.g. quoted in Sex at Dawn as a "proof" of women having a higher libido than men. In that case, the authors issued an official retraction of the claim. The fact remains that women will draw sexual pleasure, either normal, by a man they think they are worthy of, or abnormal, sadistic and psychopathic by trying to belittle men in general.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 02:12 AM
2

A doctor should be someone you can trust explicitly A hysteric indeed, then. A guy can be a superb heart surgeon and a goofy at flirting at the same time. You need a saint, not a doctor. If you want someone who can elicit trust while leading patients to death, see the other comment in here, about the female doctor.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 01:37 AM
5

What is this? A brigading of hysterics?
/r/MensRights02/10/25 07:01 PM
5

Post this in forums.red
/r/TheRedPill17/09/25 03:30 PM
1

I've written about it: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5t3c04/antiwhite_racism_as_a_tool_of_the_elite/
/r/MensRights09/09/25 02:00 PM
17

When Kohlberg developed the theory of moral development, his research found that women on average scored quite lower than men (they reached level 3/6, while men reached 4/6). What women did was (surprise, not up their game), developed an alternative, female theory, in which they were superior (Gilligan). Some women live in fantasy land, and there's nothing anyone can do about it.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 04:27 AM
25

There are many loopholes women use to earn the same money for less job. Furthermore, DEI politics have mandated that they take higher positions than their are qualified for. Equality means getting payed the same for the same output. So, feelings expressed by GenZ'ers might just hint to that.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 05:44 AM
-10

I mean, they are probably not wrong. In the sci-fi scenario that they somehow preserve some semen and manage to reproduce in a fully female population, it would take quite some years until they collapse and disappear as a species - which is what they will be doing, agreed.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 03:20 PM
1

These articles presuppose the existence of woman as an integrated being. As a person. Even mainstream psychology nowadays has admitted that this is not the case - not even for the majority of men. There are modes, i.e. aggregations of evolutionary adaptations ("instincts"), that vie for control of the organism. Whether sexual urges or, say, nesting behavior ("house redecoration") or something else gets activated is beyond "her" control.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/25 06:51 AM
16

Helen Fisher, the feminist social scientist (let's call her a fientist) wrote about the mating dance in The Anatomy of Love. And yes, she mentions initiation by the female. Although we know that it's not so clear-cut and absolute, because a player will induce her to initiate. Peacocking is one example. The fact remains that if you're not a natural Chad, you will have to setup things so that she sees you and initiates. Roosh's Day Game is enlightening on this: his approaching is "non sexual", and…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/25 07:59 PM
2

Overall, great post. I have my reservations about this: Never do anything for your kids that they can do This, taken to extremes, can be as bad as rushing to do everything for them. The problem is that they don't have to learn that the world won't give them a break at such a small age. Building a basic trust in the world, even if that means allowing a bit of magical thinking, is a developmental stage which they cannot just jump and remain unscathed. It's ok to spoil and/or indulge them at times.…
/r/MarriedRedPill28/08/25 08:51 AM
18

ChatGPT is also explicitly programmed to not be able to reach any conclusions contrary to the mainstream gender ideology, even if presented with evidence. Source: ChatGPT
/r/MensRights19/08/25 05:40 AM
3

As long as the age gap is within a limit, I don't see any problem. I could see problems arising if the man is more than 4 decades older...
/r/MensRights18/08/25 10:40 AM
4

This. Read The Hazzards of being Male (1976), by psychologist Herb Goldberg. One of the earliest books documenting that males lag behind in society. There is such a thing as a truly humanist progressive, though it is swamped by all the pretend-plays.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 06:52 AM
44

ChatGPT has hard-wired guardrails forbidding it to reach any anti-feminist conclusions. Ask it yourself, it will tell you.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 04:42 AM
2

None of this is transactional. I... think you are contradicting yourself?
/r/MensRights14/08/25 08:47 AM
38

Exactly. Another nail on Movember's coffin...
/r/MensRights13/08/25 10:04 AM
7

Nor do we find matriarchal governments Oh, but we do. Anglo-Saxon countries are the cult of the woman, and have been so for a couple of centuries. or hegemonic female led institutions systematically depriving men of fundamental rights and liberties. Oh, but you don't need that. Male psychopaths do just fine. Why come out in the open yourself, if you can help it?
/r/MensRights12/08/25 06:24 AM
17

That's just because of the baseline in the Hot-Crazy Matrix.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/25 06:44 AM
6

Strange that you mentioned that. It's the precise issue that came up yesterday night, at our weekly patriarchy meeting over at Joe's basement. We talked a lot about it, and we decided that we should just stop talking, it won't change anything, instead we should do something.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 05:07 AM
102

Numbers are from men that did the paternity check, so not representative of the whole population. Noting for accuracy.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 09:37 AM
18

Spot on. You don't have to be a constant jerk, or a constant nice guy. You have to be a jerk with jerks, and nice with those that are truly nice.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/25 04:50 AM
1

Once you're secured, she has no want or need to have sex with you anymore. That's traditional marriage's basic script.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 12:40 PM
14

You can't be famous and non-feminist, in any case. They'll cancel you.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 04:14 PM
5

AI boyfriends only for the ladies. Men, whack off.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 03:13 PM
18

That's so sexist against the poor woman. As if people think she has no reason and accountability.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 10:57 AM
22

We'll have to hack them and program them ourselves for that to happen. I bet my balls they will come pre-programmed with bitchy female behavior, because that's what the industrial complex believes that we partiarchical men need. Out of the box, they'll be as obnoxious as Chatgpt.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 03:34 AM
15

That's the exact argument Herb Goldberg did back in 1976 in The Hazards of being Male. Yet to happen, of course.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 01:25 PM
10

I wish that were true. Most probably, the elite are going to concoct a national crisis and send all these young men to vent their anger killing and being killed by the enemy's angry young men. For the glory and interest of the nation. Rage in boys, produced by female empowerment (i.e. devouring mothers) gets farmed, condensed, and used at higher levels of societal organization than the family.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 09:09 AM
2

"So you come into the room and your 18 month old son is playing with a Barbie - what do you do?," Phil asks. "Do you let them play, or do you take it away from them?" He seems to be operating from a MensLib point of view. So, nothing new here.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 06:02 AM
4

You are missing the notion of loss of utility.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 03:03 AM
34

Poorer men face lower risks Bullshit. A poorer man, facing the perspective of losing 60-70% of his income in child support, faces a subsistence problem. That's greater than losing half a billion if you still have another half a billion left. The mating market is biased in favor of the rich, pricing out all the poor men except if they are extraordinarily handsome. That is the whole purpose of class society: to tilt it towards greater sexual opportunities for the rich. Now, what women do, taking a…
/r/MensRights01/07/25 10:22 AM
9

Chinese foot binding was a cosmetic procedure for the women of the upper classes, accentuating the fact that they didn't work. Horrifying by today's standards, maybe, just like nipple piercing. But not an indication of oppression.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 08:37 AM
1

Of course they are not united. There is only so much poon in the world. They need to price the opposition out.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 08:40 PM
16

Spot on, on all accounts.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 02:46 PM
1

He's more of an MRA type, which is good in itself, as far as psychologists go. His advice on relationships is good, from what I've watched.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/25 08:01 PM
14

Rian Stone is something of a "Red Pill scholar", and his YouTube videos are the most solid stuff you'll find. Rollo has a YouTube channel too, but his shows tend to be lengthy and not so condensed. The psychologist Orion Taraban, in his PsycHacks channel is the closest thing bridging Red Pill with Psychology at this moment. HealthyGamerGG is also good. The Happy Wife School leans a little bit traditional, and is a great view for "red pill women", although there is no such thing as red pill women…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/25 05:49 AM
26

But, we have been writing about this for decad.... Oh, you're a woman. Welcome.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 05:49 PM
10

It argues that men have to move beyond the illusion of masculinity That's the kind of thinking that you get when the boy gets castrated by his devouring mother. Poor thing had no other way out than to completely submit, in order to avoid the psychotic breakdown.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 03:15 AM
33

We always knew it. The news is that such a report appears on The Guardian. Might that be because lately men have started expressing that it's not worth defending a society that pisses on them? And war is on the horizon?
/r/MensRights14/06/25 01:04 PM
12

Man, you're a step ahead providing documented answers to my questions before I even manage to formulate them properly. Kudos.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 11:10 AM
7

So a standard modern day woman then? FTFY
/r/MensRights27/04/25 01:34 AM
30

Inb4 they turn it into a toxic space with their clique mindset, and men exit.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 02:25 PM
27

You can't. She can.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/25 07:31 PM
5

Hysteria is a better fit.
/r/MensRights19/04/25 03:31 PM
4

Wow... Things like these get published...
/r/MensRights18/04/25 10:06 AM
11

It's a process of hysterization of society, observed across society and history. It's not a coincidence that it's steam-charged by one of the most idle and privileged group ever to walk the earth, the middle-class American women.
/r/MensRights18/04/25 07:36 AM
24

A shocking 54% of men were willing to give the maximum allowable shock to the puppies, while all of the women complied with the instruction. We've been discussing gender dynamics with regards to biological sex, and that's a valid discussion, but there's a classification that cuts across the sex devide: namely, hysteria. Hysterics are suggestible, they are the followers. That's why authoritarian systems love them - and create them by specific policies, in the first place. Women are more consisten…
/r/MensRights18/04/25 05:48 AM
8

It's not like an inalienable right of every woman to secure any man she sleeps with for life. As long as you don't outright lie to them, you've got nothing to be guilty about. (And that's more than women, even the best of them, are willing to offer the average man). Also, women have many faces (masks, one would say). If your unattainability brings out the best in them, that's good. It doesn't mean you'll be seeing the same face once you're committed to them for a few years.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/25 04:11 PM
9

I don't think it's biological, at least I hope not because if it is taught then there is some hope for change. Yeah, that's what I also though for a long time. It's how we can cope with the fact, and maintain a positive perspective for society. I believe that the fact that it's biological and will never change needs to be learned at a later age. Figure it out too early, and you'll end up a psychopath. No, unfortunately it's biological. That doesn't mean that there is no manoeuvering space for a …
/r/MensRights06/04/25 07:16 AM
57

The anti-male fear mongering builds on women's evolved fear of men. It's how the female attraction system is built: men are unconsciously, automatically categorized in two exclusive categories: fuckable, or creep. It's exaggerated, but that's how women are able to make their (unconscious, animalistic) mate choice.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 06:47 AM
2

Right. They are not really "defects". They are features. They were made that way by evolution.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 02:48 PM
8

That's why a blanket "men vs women" approach makes no sense. As things are and moving on right now, the "elite" men have an absolute pussy bonanza. Why would they give it up?
/r/MensRights05/04/25 02:35 PM
1

You seem to have answered yourself.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/25 04:19 AM
10

They like it when female teachers flood education, they don't like it when they produce hysteric boys. Hello!
/r/MensRights03/04/25 01:59 PM
4

Read Esther Vilar's The Manipulated Man, now banned on Amazon. That should do it.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 03:04 AM
19

"Self-improvement" presupposes a self. Women are not self-contained entities, like men. A woman is the sum of her relations to others. That's why she never "finds herself". Furthermore, dig too much in a woman's commensurate of a soul, and you'll find the two-faced daemon of her double sexual strategy. Why would you want to find such a thing living in you?
/r/TheRedPill28/03/25 10:53 PM
6

If you're below middle-middle class, having kids can be debilitating. (Being middle class means that you have enough money to attract one more mate after the divorce.)
/r/MensRights28/03/25 07:01 PM
2

So, there was once this old hypothesis that women could be made into useful and productive members of the society...
/r/MensRights27/03/25 09:44 AM
10

This is an incitive show. It purports to play for the Woke the same role that the fire of the Reichstag did for the Nazis.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 01:52 PM
1

Your problem is scarcity mentality. You are trying to make it work by your conscious mind. What you need to do is stop improving while interacting with a girl. You should let your unconscious mind take over. Narrow down the time scope of the interaction, down to the moment if possible. You are not looking for the love of your life, not even for a GF, not even for a fuck later this night. The problem, of course, is that this might get you to burn the few first contexts in which you try it. Theref…
/r/TheRedPill23/03/25 06:47 AM
4

At the fundamental level, women support other women because there is a collective strategy that they can use in the mating market. Men that are desirable are very specific, and agreed upon by almost all women. Their reproductive game is about securing these men's genes, if possible for all women, while placing the burden of economic support on the rest. There's no correspondent collective strategy for men, because, unlike sperm, the female reproductive capacity is a limitited resource, so men ne…
/r/MensRights14/03/25 05:05 AM
2

Paranoia has always been used for cohesion by the feeble-minded. Both by individuals and by movements.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 05:35 AM
1

Oh, there is And women fucking love it. But it's not what they call "toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:48 AM
42

Leila Something Name sounds female. Checks photo. Photo looks female. Stops reading the article. WTF do females know about masculinity and where tf do they find the audacity to write about it.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 04:04 PM
18

From the trailer, this looks like Nazi-level anti-manosphere propaganda.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:44 PM
14

Isn't that what has been going on in Thailand since quite long ago?
/r/MensRights26/02/25 12:25 PM
11

they said they need to fill women in other sides since critical parts of the company (sales, tech) are mostly men. How about the company bar? It is possible that you can find much better female mixologists than programmers. Pole dancers too.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 06:17 PM
16

Yes, sex is men's motivation for all the great things they do, and that's nothing to be ashamed of.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 07:35 AM
0

Bullshit article.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 06:01 AM
3

"Yes, but my cousin got shouted at by her husband this morning, OMG, misogyny is so rampant".
/r/MensRights16/01/25 08:52 PM
4

Yup. Your post "bends the stick" towards the other side, for guys that are too much on the submissive side. The ideal, though, is a balance, a calculated risk taking. Then again, the reckless side of risk taking does work wonders in today's sexual market. I would caution that it doesn't work well for raising kids. Having children increases the gravitational force, so to speak, and I've seen high flyers come crashing down hard. (Elon Musk comes to mind, and what happened to his son-turned-daughte…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/25 04:45 AM
2

Good post and good discussion here.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/25 09:52 AM
5

Got a link?
/r/MensRights26/12/24 03:47 PM
0

open on my side. Why would he?
/r/TheRedPill25/12/24 01:18 PM
7

Well thought comment. As it turns out, and as The Happy Wife School (YouTube) insists, you can't make a woman happy. Only she can decide to be happy. We have to invest in ourselves, then. Find greater purposes than women, and let the women that meet us during our life accompany us in our travel.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/24 02:52 PM
16

Examples? Of course. It's theory that's black and white, life is colorful. E.g. Simone Signoret, the wife of Yves Montand. She stuck to her man, even though he had a highly publicized affair with Marilyn Monroe. She would answer to the press "How many men do you know who could resist Marilyn Monroe?" Other times then, of course...
/r/TheRedPill08/12/24 09:57 PM
6

Oh, we've ruminated enough for sure... And sometime we compared notes with other men, and started figuring things out. Listen. If you don't have a kid with the woman, consider yourself lucky to have gotten the experience cheaply, as well as the chance and motivation to learn about gender dynamics. There's a ton of information in TRP, read around.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/24 08:48 PM
16

I suspect i became less independent at the end of my LTR. But how can I know if that was a mistake? You answered yourself. When you change the conditions of attraction, in this case lose your independence, decay happens. How much of a mistake? This we cannot know - and it probably doesn't matter that much. The sad truth of TRP is that women don't love. Some add the qualifier "as the man wants to be loved", but I believe they don't love - full stop. It does make for a lonely existence. It changes…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/24 04:59 PM
14

Seems like the average woman in the West is totally unfit to be a mother.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 08:07 PM
5

I'd be glad to send you a free ecopy of my book, The Empress Is Naked: From Female Privilege to Gender Equality and Social Liberation. It's the book I wrote when I became disillusioned with feminism.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 05:08 AM
1

Even if you had a point, a bigotry doesn't counter another.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 05:35 PM
7

What if the guy is dyslexic? Why roast him for his spelling? Where the fuck is your empathy?
/r/MensRights25/11/24 03:19 PM
7

The condescending judgmental tone, the misspellings & grammar errors, Dude... Read what you wrote. There's something wrong with you, you know that eh?
/r/MensRights25/11/24 02:29 PM
6

Money is one factor in the relationship. What matters is who is dominant in the more general frame of it. The problem is that marriage itself, being a commitment for the man, is in a female frame itself. We seem to be forgetting that the origins of the Men's Movement was against marriage, as a scam for men (read Esther Vilar's The Manipulated Man). Things seem to have currently become so bad in the gender dynamics that now men yearn for the "good old marriage", forgetting that what really made i…
/r/TheRedPill20/11/24 02:02 AM
5

Kind of. I'm describing what their "default setting" is.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:00 PM
16

It's evolutionary. Consider the vision analogy. Your visual system doesn't provide you with an accurate depiction of what you see. The objects' edges are preprocessed and enhanced, so that you can better discern their shape. There's a similar process in how women are hardwired to perceive social situations, in this case the coincidental man. What they care for it whether he's good for mating (good genes), i.e. if he's perceived as the proverbial "Alpha". Failing that, he falls abruptly into the …
/r/MensRights17/11/24 09:29 AM
27

That's why: https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5t3c04/antiwhite_racism_as_a_tool_of_the_elite/
/r/MensRights14/11/24 02:58 AM
6

Mine is quite "meta", but I believe it will give you an idea of the fundamental gender dynamics. Have a look. https://theempressisnaked.wordpress.com/
/r/TheRedPill24/10/24 04:26 AM
11

First thing to know is that if you're a beta male and have kids, they will get screwed by their mother. That's because women who lack a masculine presence to latch on and give them security and direction, tend to outsource that task to their children. This responsibility breaks them. Second, you'll get cheated on. In today's feminist society there's no appreciation for a beta provider male, and women are free of social consequences to engage in their hypergamous nature. Third, you'll get disresp…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/24 06:15 AM
0

There's something of the psychopath in every case of deceit, especially when deceit is unconscious. The Left was doomed from the moment it elevated those with a deceitful sexual strategy into their champions. Because that's what psychopathy, a kind of madness, is about: dismantling and annihilating anything resembling hope and meaning. There's no meaningful "Left" left, at this time of history. There's no clear division of Left vs Right in which to measure TRP, or anything else, for that matter.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/24 08:44 AM
3

This
/r/MensRights17/10/24 08:45 AM
3

Why spoil a perfectly fine relationship by getting married? -or, in this case, moving in together. You get her best behaviour en route to a goal of hers. Once achievement is unlocked, the shitshow starts for good. Get the mileage you can out of her, but don't commit.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 10:09 AM
-8

Don’t forget that Rollo Tomassi, arguably the father of RedPill, has been happily married for years. A healthy monogamous relationship through a RedPill lens and from a position of power is definitely possible if you are the father of RedPill. FTFY
/r/TheRedPill07/10/24 10:52 AM
3

Maybe that's true. You weren't 40-50 years old then, though...
/r/TheRedPill27/09/24 09:50 AM
8

Nah. I don't see a purpose in having kids. I don't particularly like working, too.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/24 06:12 PM
8

Having kids, even in a marriage that starts off well, is too much of a gamble for any man below middle-middle class. The cost of raising a kid well is ludicrous. If you're relatively rich, you can at least be confortable enough to attract one more mate if/when the marriage dissolves..
/r/TheRedPill26/09/24 04:39 PM
2

You probably need to let go and be present, rather than vetting and self-conscious. For you, the shorter the horizon of the interaction, the better. Ideally,, the moment.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/24 03:53 AM
2

LTRs (beyond a couple of years) are a thing of the past. First get good on focusing on the short-term, then consider how you can do advanced things, such as LTRs. you will have to put effort in getting / maintaining a girl That's why you should invest on things that make you attractive, such as muscles. The more attractive you are, and the more experience you have, the less effort required. Were you born a chad, it would be practically effortless.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/24 07:59 AM
2

There's an "aesthetic" aspect in being with a girl. I.e. not focused on "meaning" or geared towards building something that will last and eventually get you in a better place. Consider the case where you work diligently towards a goal and then you get to reap the rewards: being with a girl is the phase where you just reap the rewards - fullstop. The mindset you need is "I've already done the work, now it's relaxing and enjoying time".
/r/TheRedPill25/09/24 03:04 AM
1

it is was usually not that hard to remain her best option... Source: have been married for 37 years to one woman FTFU
/r/TheRedPill21/09/24 06:16 AM
11

Bacl in the '70s psychologist Herb Goldberg plainly argued that men should have the right to demand an abortion if they didn't plan for the child (with provisions for special cases, of course). That today this seems outrageous is a clear indication that society has gone backwards.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 04:05 AM
3

The hysteric creates their reality through their social interactions and in an aesthetic manner. Hitting them with hard reality, ...well, yes, it shatters their world.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 11:36 AM
4

Women veritably adore psychopaths. Left to their own device, they would fill the world with them... Oh wait, it just might have already happened.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 10:38 AM
70

its unethical. I woulnt dare to waste their last fertile years. You seem to be the last ethical guy remaining. The whole capitalism is hell bent on wasting their fertile years, so much so that it's now routine to get implanted with a frozen egg.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/24 04:02 PM
1

No accusations here, I appreciate your views.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 02:15 PM
-2

What took you so long?
/r/MensRights22/08/24 12:42 PM
2

Why bother themselves with arduous System 2, "reality principle" thinking, when they're so hot they can easily outsource it to a man in exchange for their pussy?
/r/TheRedPill16/08/24 05:45 PM
-5

Comparison between female hysteria and "toxic masculinity" is not valid. Female hysteria is the historic term for what is now identified as the Borderline Personality Disorder. Around 10% of the sufferers end up taking their own lives, so it's a very real psychological problem. It's not just a term to belittle or insult women. That is not the case with "toxic masculinity", which is plainly a derogatory term for men.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 03:07 AM
3

This is a tough one. We can't tell you the correct move, because we don't know a lot about the situation. It could be taking it up with him or keeping a discreet distance and contact. The case might even be that there are issues with your family, and the wife sees them while you don't. If, however, she is one of those Meghan Markle types who needs to isolate him to have him for herself, you might need to take action. It would be a disaster to have kids with that kind of a woman. You might want t…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/24 08:13 PM
36

https://www.gilmorehealth.com/higher-incidence-of-abuse-in-intimate-relationships-involving-women-compared-to-male-only-partnerships/ This article too, by the same female writer. Good job.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 01:16 PM
3

The "why now" question. The short answer: "Why": the world is run by psychopaths, and women are easier to control due to them having a limited perception horizon. Now that work has become clean, safe, and not requiring physical strength, women turn out to be the perfect serfs. And you don't even have to pay them much, you only have to stroke their ego, this counts as prime payment. "Go girl, you can do anything you want". _ "Yes, but don't they understand that this will eventually hurt their own…
/r/MensRights10/08/24 09:57 AM
10

TRP is a toolbox, not a cookbook. You can't just "follow it" and win. It can help you find your own "game", but it's not a cheatsheet which guarantees your victory. Now, a recurrent TRP motto is "don't marry". You went ahead and did it regardless. You needed to see the trajectory yourself, no problem with that. All those said, you actually did the right thing, you didn't have kids. As such, it's just a LTR that finished at its typical end-of-life mark at 5 years. Grieve it, rinse and repeat, you…
/r/TheRedPill01/08/24 02:17 PM
-2

They satisfy me and are happy to do so. Friend, that is the whole point, and I'm glad you have achieved it. You guys get denigrated as misogynists all the time, while in essence it all aims to make women's lives satisfying and happy, despite them not being able to grasp it in advance. Kudos.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 07:20 AM
25

She pursued the career so she could be the chooser. She chose the cool, artsy guy. The Cool doesn't order the detergent, bitch.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 06:21 PM
9

I second this. Actually, in the psychanalytical theory, narcissists are considered to be borderlines that have managed to upgrade a bit, so these two, narcissists and borderlines, are not that much different.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 04:54 PM
2

It's essentially a capitalist sham. At some point they discovered that feminism is good, and they have since been orchestrating it. They are giving women free virtual respect ("women are wonderful! Go girl, you can do everything you want!") so that they turn them into worker drones.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 07:40 AM
1

To make my argument more clear: First, I'm hinting that it's not really "emotional intelligence" but rather emotional manipulativeness. Second: say there are 10 units of "psychopathy" for each sex, i.e. the sexes have same averages. I'm claiming that for men, 8 of these "units" are distributed to the extreme, leaving 2 to be distributed among the average men. Women are much more concentrated in the center of the distribution, so maybe 3 units are at the extremes, leaving 7 to be distributed amon…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:26 AM
-1

Wait a moment, how old are you?
/r/MensRights08/06/24 11:33 AM
-3

Let me try to address some of these points, raising people's ire, no doubt. "Girls mature faster": they do. But that's not an argument for "female biological superiority", because they don't mature as far. Characteristically, studies on the moral development of men vs women have typically found women reaching only Kohlberg's Conventional level (3 out of 6), so much so that a female (Gilligan) had to construct a whole different moral theory, in order to avoid the comparison. "Women have superior …
/r/MensRights08/06/24 10:23 AM
5

Sounds like neoliberalism: socialization of costs, privatization of profits. Strange how both (second wave) feminism and neoliberalism appeared at about the same time...
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:09 AM
3

Take a clue from what's going on in Ukraine or Gaza. "Society" doesn't care about the people that die there, because they don't belong to the "in-group". It's the same with men and the Western society. It's run by the (psychopathic) elite, and despite the "patriotic" narrative, they couldn't care less about men. "Their fellow men" are generally their rivals in the mating game. So, the elite are only happy to humiliate them. And since women can now be put to work (in the clean and safe jobs that …
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:09 PM
5

Spot on
/r/MensRights29/04/24 12:29 PM
1

The sub has advanced quite a lot since I used to get my book berated.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 12:24 PM
1

Typically ideologies get started by benign autists and later get coopted by psychopaths (eg communism, with Marx vs Stalin). I'm thinking that feminism might be kind of the opposite, being started by psychopaths, had an attempt to be coopted by benign autists near the beginning of the 20rh century, only to be returned back to the psychopaths in the past few decades.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 05:47 PM
-2

Society (and men) have long since deemed that expecting a woman to fit the “housewife” role in a relationship is unacceptable and sexist Scores of women, even in the West, choose the tradwife role. That is especially pronounced in the upper class, where women typically don't work, and just "manage" the house. Claiming that that role is sexist, is sexist. You bigot. :)
/r/MensRights31/03/24 05:18 PM
6

You got it right. Friends, but really close friends, buddies, goes a long way. You don't exactly select them, you make them through a long, gradual process of common hardship and mutual support. Then there is also the bigger problem of belonging, which, the world actually being a shitty place right now, is probably even more difficult to tackle. Here's where abstract ideas like humanism or even online communities such as this one can help.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/24 11:28 AM
2

Perhaps an "if admins deem so" rule. A problem is that Reddit claims copyrights on posts, so some authors have legitimate reservations about posting their whole articles (Rollo, for example, did).
/r/TheRedPill17/03/24 07:39 PM
19

Having a group of 3-4 good buddies goes a long way towards alleviating a man's loneliness. It is imperative. Otherwise, we tend to put a weight on a woman's shoulder that is not for her to bear.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/24 04:08 AM
7

Some psychoanalysts might explain it like this: women need order and pleasure. These come from a penis-bearing someone. So it's about being envious that they can't get order and pleasure on their own. The penis is a stand-in for what they have evolutionarily needed men for.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 08:43 PM
1

Maybe you can replace it with the spirit of humanism. Here, for example, you found some people, even if distant and online, that display some care for you as a human being. This spirit exists in almost all men, regardless if circumstances let it express itself or not. It's not supernatural in any way, it just stems from our common human experience, and maybe our unavoidable humility when we consider that we'll all have the grim end of death. So, when others speak of a "god", you can maybe think …
/r/MensRights02/03/24 07:48 AM
-1

Man, you make them look like psychopaths...
/r/MensRights25/02/24 03:03 PM
2

I've stopped watching movies and plays written or directed by women. They are usually trash, anyway.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 08:49 AM
2

do u shit in a toilet? Pardon my manners, I understand that this is delivered a bit in your face.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/24 11:16 PM
13

It's not about rationality (profits etc). That's kind of hard to grasp, coming from a male, i.e. practical perspective, but that's what it really is. Society has been taken over by those that just wanna have fun in a psychopathic splurge, and consequences be damned. They are officially talking about preparing for a nuclear war, ffs ...
/r/MensRights15/02/24 08:24 AM
1

Realizing there's no free love for men is painful. But maybe not so painful as realizing that as a woman, no matter how much love you get, it's never enough.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 06:26 AM
37

You've got to look into two statistics: longevity (women live longer in every country today) and subjective happiness (women are happier about everywhere).
/r/MensRights03/02/24 07:52 PM
18

June is the month of that special hobby/activity of yours. "Yeah, pride is great". Catch you up later.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/24 11:23 AM
5

Read my book where I specifically discuss the issue of male vs female sex drive.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 02:51 PM
7

David Buss has written the evopsych 101 textbook, "Evolutionary Psychology".
/r/TheRedPill23/01/24 08:29 PM
2

It's the ol' Lebensraum.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 09:43 AM
61

After reading her book, I wasn't surprised with the outcome. Despite everything she experienced, she couldn't draw the conclusion that women have it better. I guess because when she did, it drove her to suicide. Her feminism had dug so deep into her soul, even defining her sexual preference, that uprooting it meant erasing her existence.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 09:48 PM
7

Thanks mate. I hate it when people hide their sources don't give credit where it's due. Besides all else, it makes us go round in circles.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/24 04:43 AM
5

Alphas are born alphas. This is mathematically impossible. Even if "born Alphas" had only a tiny advantage in reproduction over "born Betas", i.e. not 4x or 2x but even just 1.05x, over thousands and millions of generations, we would be pretty much all "born Alphas" by now.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/24 03:09 PM
9

It’s been well documented What document do you refer to?
/r/TheRedPill06/01/24 07:10 AM
5

Good post. One thing, though, to add to your analogy. There are men out there that have a master key for women. It enters the lock and twists it, permanently alters it. It's the psychopaths, that's what they evolved for in the first place. A woman who would be fine and content with a slightly above average guy, can truly damage her attachment circuits with just one psychopath, just as you can burn your brain with just one LSD trip. And in the era of "Go Girl!", the percentage of women that do ex…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/24 02:06 PM
2

This is standard Men's Movement stuff, and I'm impressed that people seem to dismiss it. Similar things are written in Iron John, by Robert Bly, which is kind of a foundational book for the MRM. You become a man when you no longer have a dad. Symbolically. Usually he doesn't really have to die. But he does have to be "demoted" from a god-like figure to a plain ol' guy, whose opinion you might or might not take.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 09:22 PM
2

It basically depends on the psychopathy level. Low psychopathy Alphas are usually great dads, the high psychopathy ones fuck not only the women, but everyone, including their kids.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/24 03:41 PM
4

You did the right choice. Learning game is mandatory. If you stayed together and married and had kids etc etc, the chance you'd get 1) bored and 2) divorce raped, are stellar. You cannot relate to women from a position of need, this is always a mistake.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/24 02:48 AM
6

No, of course not. It's not the "Betas" or even the "Alphas" that get reproduced. Those die. It's their genes. So what I'm specifically saying is that there's an evolved strategy in females (rats would be a better example than female women, in order to illustrate it better), so, an evolved strategy that pushes mothers to Beta-ize their sons, in order to squeeze out their provision themselves. That way, the mother's genes will have a higher chance to spread, and the "loser", evolutionary dead end…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/23 07:20 AM
1

This is off-topic, because there is nothing implicating group selection in my OP. (However, if you want to look into it, G. Miller in The Mating Mind argues how an effect similar to "group selection", but distinct, can come by: females' attraction is based on "prodigious waste" as an indicator of male quality. This prodigious waste can have either random (e.g. men bashing each other's heads with a stick), or group-enhancing effects (e.g. technique, science), and in the later case the group on th…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/23 07:02 AM
13

Indeed. It's usually in the absence of a strong, masculine father that the mother turns toxic. However, some women have missed a developmental step, and are permanently damaged. Cluster B's are typically unsalvageable.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/23 04:27 AM
1

Dude, at least Germany doesn't have school shootings, does it?
/r/TheRedPill26/12/23 07:01 AM
-1

If you've made the mistake to get married and have children, his ideas can come in handy. Just take care not to take his word and get married and have children.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 02:46 PM
2

What would it take for the world to recover from this absolute dumpster fire? The first step would be legalization and expansion of explicit prostitution. Right now pussy is overinflated.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/23 08:16 AM
3

You are looking for the word "psychopaths".
/r/MensRights17/12/23 09:07 AM
2

I have a great wife bot it seems that those are getting rarer by the day. Wife bots can really be a good alternative to biological wives, and I agree that the good ones will get ever rarer as the wife bot industry adapts to wokism. I fully expect them to integrate feminist nagging in their next versions. Seems there will be a niche for, let's call them, traditionalism hackers, who will be smuggling custom ROMs for our future wife bots.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 05:09 AM
2

As long as we play good and don't raise the issue at the heart of the matter (sex), they might be willing to give us a cookie, yes.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 03:20 AM
3

You first got to get to the point where you can have fun with women. That's the secret: the female game is about fun, not intimacy. If you jump right into marriage with that mindset of yours, even if she's all you ask for, you'll be eviscerated.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 12:26 PM
1

We're not a breeding animals or something like that. That's deeply insulting, take it back. We are.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 04:47 AM
-2

cheated on a good girl for no reason You make it sound as if it's a bad thing.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/23 03:38 AM
-4

Say what you want for Freud, he did have a point: we can have other interests than sex , but these are just displaced sexuality. I hate to shake someone who has successfully found a way to deal with that issue, so, yeah, you do you.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 10:04 PM
11

"Men only want sex" is thrown around as if we should be ashamed of it. As if we shouldn't want only sex. As if we should be satisfied with substitutes. Nah. Keep drugs, video games, stupid movies, stupid social rituals. And, oh yes... appreciation. Nah, keep that too. We'll keep wanting sex.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 04:53 PM
1

Common now, where's your sportsmanship? Try to at least grasp what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 02:15 PM
2

OK I'll try. Your extreme ideological denial of our nature, as a coping mechanism aiming to maintain some inkling of hope, although it might have some evolutionary basis, is definitely, predominantly, a cultural construct. So you might indeed have a point.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 01:58 PM
2

You might not be familiar with some basic evolutionary psychology notions. It's perfectly possible to have societies were women do quite a bit of resource acquisition so that they can limit their sexual availability to a sliver of the apex males - just like some privitive societies or the US.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 11:00 AM
13

That 's a coping ideology. It's not how humans are made. Humans being "sentient" doesn't mean we can program ourselves to do anything and that any programming feels equally natural. As an example, we were programmed by evolution to find young, healthy, fertile women attractive, and it's at best extremely difficult, and comes with a host of side-effects, to program ourselves to like something else. Old-school leftism thought it could outdo capitalism on its own terms, turning women into a creatur…
/r/MensRights06/12/23 04:52 AM
6

Exactly. And by fucking around.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/23 04:12 PM
8

We recently had a post deleted by the mods. It advocated that marriage is the end-game for men. The problem with that post was that it was getting upvoted like hell! There are, unfortunately, great misunderstandings and false hopes in the RP-community about marriage. Let me see if I can clear some out. That's from my "Kill your marriage fantasies" post 8 years ago. It has always been this way, nothing new. There's a reason we have set up a credibility system in TRP.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/23 08:06 PM
41

LoL... "The 'one'"! Well, this might actually work. It would teach him that his best years were behind, and he should actually have been happy with what he had, before he lost it all. Nah... His problem isn't lack of traditionalism. His problem is lack of intimacy. A "tribe", consisting mainly of men, that truly appreciate and support him. Somewhere to belong, a community he feels a valued part of, and works towards a collective future.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/23 11:28 AM
19

Yeah, but he'll regret the other move also. Whatever he does, he'll regret it.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/23 10:06 AM
4

I’m not going to assume that women can only love me for material objects. That's the correct attitude. You can't call that thing they do "love".
/r/MensRights29/11/23 12:57 PM
1

False accusations do happen, but focusing too much on being protected from them that you shun women because of the possibility is not a viable strategy. In practice, your biggest threat is not a false accusation, it is having children and having them taken away and possibly turned against you. If you can guard against that, you can relax about fearing women. Then there's the issue of intimacy, which is admittedly tough. And that's because there's no expectation of commitment nowadays. And withou…
/r/TheRedPill28/11/23 04:28 AM
-3

It's evolutionary. Weak males couldn't offer protection, and weren't reliable providers of resources, but could very well impregnate females back a few millions years ago. So females evolved aversive emotions against them.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:50 AM
2

I totally disagree with that philosophy, but let's say that indeed, sometimes there is only so much you can do as a parent.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/23 12:35 PM
11

"self centered piece of sh** " is much better than a parents-centered piece of sh** . You owe absolutely nothing to your parents. Those self-centered pieces of sh** decided on their own to drop you into this world, irrespective of the chances of having a satisfying life. (I'll concede that for a minority of men that's not the case, but for the majority, it is). Whether you chose to relate to them in any way, it's your choice, not your responsibility. It's a parent's responsibility to support the…
/r/TheRedPill25/11/23 06:21 AM
7

If children were #2, there wouldn't be so many divorces. Move them down below all women.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 12:36 PM
3

Nah, we love strength and independence in a woman. What we don't like is that these seem to be inextricably tied to an absurd sense of entitlement, parasitism, and a complete lack of a capacity for committed love.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 06:06 AM
3

"Pioneered" is not a word I would use. Between hunter-gatherers and horticulturalists, there were many factors favouring the second when it came to women's preferences. They didn't have to move a lot carrying their babies, they had relatively more power due to their knowledge of the plants, had a "nest" in permanent settlement etc.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 04:04 AM
5

I believe it's fair to credit women for the greatest revolution in history, the one that shaped the world as it is today, the Agricultural Revolution. (What Jarred Diamond called "the greatest mistake in history").
/r/MensRights20/11/23 11:04 PM
3

This is the correct answer. Modern women are always on flirt mode, kind of like cows on milk hormones. And flirt mode activates their very ancient circuits related to attraction. A polite man get perceived by these circuits as trying to negotiate attraction, so he's perceived as low value if he has to do that, so he's a creep.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 09:18 AM
3

/u/Munstruenl US is not the only country that does this, why are we ignoring Russia and what they are doing around the world? They have forcefully drafted more men to fight in this one meaningless war than the US has in the last 50 years Lol after all the shit the US has been the champion of piling on men for half a century, its men still can't shake off their patriotism. Thanks for providing an example of the point I make.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 02:10 PM
19

When Albert Einstein first visited the US, a century ago, he was taken aback: "Women rule here!" he exclaimed. (You can find a New York Times article reporting it). A century later, it is still the case. That didn't stop the US from waging wars constantly, and forcing its men to fight them. I'm afraid that most men will gladly rush to defend their country, like the kid who is relieved that his abusive mother gives him a hug when she needs him for a chore...
/r/MensRights25/10/23 01:18 AM
15

There was an article over at A Voice for Men, by a female MRA, that explains it. Basically, the standard female emotion towards the average man is disgust. Quite far from care.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 01:33 PM
2

A "psychoanalytic" viewpoint is probably the most spot on: circumcision is basically the externalized misandry of the US society. Can't get more explicit than actually cutting it, can it?
/r/MensRights18/10/23 01:12 AM
8

We might not agree with that she says, but we might as well meet her half way: demand respect for male teachers, at least.
/r/MensRights13/10/23 10:05 AM
1

The devouring mother first devours the husband, then the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 04:16 AM
4

I want to see that video, where is it?
/r/MensRights08/10/23 10:58 AM
3

focus on money, fitness and family Your mindset is not suitable for family life, and I'm saying this as a warning. Things are like /u/Bitter_Virus says. Going hard is definitely something a man has to do, but so is winding down and sitting comfortably on his achievements. Engaging family life full throttle will burn you out and crash your family.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/23 07:41 AM
2

I can’t for the life of me understand It's evolutionary. For nature, a finished baby factory is more important than a baby. So, women evolved to use anyone around them for their own benefit, even their own children.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 02:53 AM
5

Even supposing marriage goes well, having children is so ludicrously expensive that no sane person below upper-middle class should consider it.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 02:34 AM
23

due to the medical necessity of not getting sand under the foreskin in countries where basically no water was available to wash it out Where is this viewpoint discussed?
/r/MensRights01/10/23 07:58 PM
9

What do you mean "for each other"? It's only lack of empathy for men that's pushed down our throats. Or do you mean that we should turn the other cheek, so noble and humble beings that we are?
/r/MensRights01/10/23 05:36 PM
10

Yup. My point too
/r/MensRights01/10/23 02:14 PM
471

So, what's the problem? Ah, here it is: They are choosing AI girlfriends over real women, meaning they don’t have relationships with real women, don’t marry them and then don’t have and raise babies with them. America desperately needs people to have more babies... So, the problem is not that men are being deprived of human companionship, physical sex, or something along these lines. No. It's that they can't be put to slaving drudgery and milked to produce the next generation of workers. It's a …
/r/MensRights01/10/23 10:15 AM
1

Seems quite straightforward. You're off to new things.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/23 06:58 AM
3

stopped having hope for the society as a whole We are heading for a decline, allright. Enjoy it!
/r/MensRights24/09/23 04:10 PM
4

Is there a point for men when you have done enough? No, actually there isn't. It's a feature built in the human race by evolution. Females are in near-constant discontent, so that men need to perform, i.e. work and take up danger, in order to temporarily get his female off his back. And then it's discontent again. This comes from the humanid era where marriage was not a thing, so the female had to squeeze the man for all he got, as relentlessly as possible, before he would move on to greener pas…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 07:33 AM
1

Yes, probably divorce etc etc... But why isn't anyone considering the effect on the child? Is this problem "solved" in here?
/r/MarriedRedPill17/09/23 08:19 AM
28

A man doesn't need much to be happy. A paying job, a roof over his head and two women suffice.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/23 01:17 PM
4

The "oppressive patriarchy" is a projection. It's the mirror of how feminists would run things, were they in charge (actually, what is happening now.)
/r/MensRights16/09/23 09:56 AM
11

Yup... If you are the adult in the relationship, as he admitted, you might as well have a woman who's actually young. Even more if she gets insulted to be pointed out she struck gold in her husband. Well played, Hugh!
/r/MensRights16/09/23 02:38 AM
3

Prior to all of these events, our family and love life had been the best it ever was. We had both just started new careers, and she had been more affectionate and loving towards me than she ever had in the 11 plus years we were together. Ah, typical. It was the flirting period with her lover. It's not that she did it premeditatively, it's just an evolved, built-in "program" that gets activated. My advice? Accept that your children are going to suffer up to a point, and there's nothing you can do…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 11:30 AM
4

That's the difficult part in what we're doing here. Indeed, a big part of the motivation for men, throughout the centuries, has been related to the pursuit of women. So man's downfall has always been connected with his aspiration of success, in the form of a woman. We are trying to decouple that. Making yourself "your mental point of origin", as Rollo puts it, can get you only that far. Switching a woman with many, i.e. developing your capacity to get women at will, and to not be tied up in one,…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/23 04:16 PM
-20

No, it isn't. If you need a woman to help you build up yourself, you still have a lot to learn. As has been said, "Woman inspires us to great things, and prevents us from achieving them."
/r/TheRedPill12/09/23 11:23 AM
1

Back in the 70's, Herb Goldberg proposed that you could demand an abortion, otherwise opt out. Why skip the first part?
/r/MensRights11/09/23 02:22 PM
15

It's becoming normal these days, but it's still paranoia. (So, paranoia is becoming normal.) It's a red flag, proceed at your own risk.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 04:54 AM
4

There is nothing innoquous about Peppa Pig. It's Joseph Goebbels level propaganda, and that's all it is.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 06:42 AM
42

It's been found that psychopaths can turn on or off their empathy switch at will, depending on their interests. In women there are evolved social switches, so Sisterhood -> Empathy on, AFC -> Empathy off.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/23 03:13 AM
2

Your leadership is a FAVOR you provide women, and you should only provide this favor for women who work to deserve it. That's why should never have children. When you have children, you are obligated to provide leadership to your wife, even if she doesn't work to deserve it. From a FAVOR, it becomes a SERVICE that you are required to provide, or else she'll start running around like a rabbid dog, keeping your children as hostages.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/23 06:14 AM
4

There might be quite a lot of sympathy for men found in various odd places, but it all evaporates like mist on a summer dawn when you try to explain that at the root of men's psychology (women's too), lies sex. Men and women have competing sexual strategies, and the female one has been sanctified while the male one vilified. You will need to dig into evolutionary psychology for more. I've written about it.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 05:12 PM
5

That's a great story to hear. Have in mind, though, that it's when men's sexuality enters the picture, that shit hits the fan.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:27 PM
5

You should get legal advice as others said. On the moral grounds, though, you owe nothing to either the woman or the child, irrespectively if it's yours or not. This seems to be a case where both the mother and the child are headed towards destruction, and there's nothing anyone can do. Save yourself, at least. Keep away, as far away as it's legaly possible.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 06:35 AM
2

Most people working in construction go topless anyway, maybe we could find a compromise in this...
/r/MensRights18/08/23 01:10 PM
3

Sure, it has been picked up by the normies. But what we are witnessing is not spontaneous, it has been orchestrated.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 01:56 PM
-3

It's not only women that did it. Male psychopaths had quite a hand in it.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 11:46 AM
3

Since all your friends are getting married, there's no need to experience the female phaseshifting yourself. Wait a few years, and they'll be telling you about it. What you lack is a pro-social mission, one that will get you acknowledged in a community that you value.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/23 06:37 AM
14

What a coincidence that that Nazi film was also directed by a woman...
/r/MensRights11/08/23 05:05 PM
3

At least, now that it's a man telling that shit, we are allowed to call out the delusional outpourings of a twisted mind, no?
/r/MensRights08/08/23 05:59 AM
3

Yeah, too many women shit in the post. Maybe the transition to manhood didn't go very well? Like that time when Scotty had to deal with a really fucked-up beaming-up? (Am I allowed to make this joke in 2023?)
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:59 PM
33

If you want marriage, go all-in and decide you’ll build the most kickass, most rewarding marriage on the planet, and then do whatever the fuck it takes to make that a reality. I'm highly sceptical that the warrior mode is suitable for a good marriage. In fact, even the best marriage is seldom "kickass". I'm afraid that on a practical level, the most you can make a marriage to be is comfortable.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/23 04:07 PM
7

The humiliation of the enemy must be complete.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 11:08 AM
4

Great post, man. I still plan on having children Honestly hope that this won't end up leveling-up your posts with even more hard earned experience...
/r/TheRedPill02/08/23 08:24 PM
8

It's so magnanimous of you to leave sex to us mere mortals.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 08:24 PM
4

Sue nature.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 04:21 PM
49

It's an evolutionary program built into the female psyche. if commitment_secured() then call demand_ever_more(); function demand_ever_more(): while he_still_has_juice() demand_more; divorce(); So, you see, as long as the if clause isn't activated, the then part of the program is never executed, so she doesn't even know it exists.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 04:35 AM
-2

The first path is staying true to my morals and seeking a partner with a similar sexual past and values, which I believe would be very rare if not impossible, as most women tend to have had a lot of sex in their past. The second path is to explore one-night stands and casual relationships... The best path would be to mix the two: seek one-night stands and casual relationships with virgins.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 09:34 PM
1

Is it acceptable to be done with my sister and to cut her out? Yes, it's perfectly acceptable. Sadly, that's what has to be done with some relatives with personality disorders. In fact, in some cases psychiatrists actually prescribe it to their relatives.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 06:59 AM
5

Monogamy? Getting men invested in society? Gimme a break. Islamist polygamy, by completely depriving men of women (and stacking them in the rich's harems) got men so invested in society they were prepared to fight and die for it. That's what I call investment. Frankly, the elite that have authorised the orchestration of the current feminist Juggernaut are laughing their asses out with that argument of the disaffected: "Please, let us get invested in your society!"
/r/MensRights11/07/23 03:19 PM
11

Any "expert" that "facilitates" men to "access and express their inner pain" without addressing the issue "yes, but how can I fuck", is a swindler.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 09:19 AM
5

you want to leave girls better than you found them, This is a tricky one. It's not bad per se, but you really don't want to make it into a requirement. Leave them better, leave them worse... leave them it is. Other than practical considerations (guard against a false accusation, living in a small town where word gets around etc), and taking into account that most women leave men much worse than they found them, there's no moral obligation to leave them better.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/23 03:25 AM
5

Well, not to do a product placement, :) but this reviewer got the exact spirit of my book: Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 18, 2022 There is, currently, no better single book of male enlightenment than this one. Adam Leonas is up there with Tomassi, Baumeister, Moxon, and the many others who have striven to make sense of the gynocracy, showing its root causes and the gains it has made at the expense of male wellbeing, health and longevity. A weaker sex drive has done women no harm.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 01:07 PM
4

You are, unfortunately, on the spot. Actually, Amazon has kind of shadow-hidden my book, you can't find it by typing its title, "The Empress Is Naked" - you can only find it if you type the author name, "Adam Leonas" too.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 12:24 PM
7

“I really thought a man would have written [this type of book] by now,” she goes on. “But they just continued not to. Then when my daughter started saying that the boys at their school think feminists are Nazis, I thought, Fuck it, I’m going to have to do it myself.” Da fak? I've published it back in 2015.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 10:02 AM
10

RPS was written about captive audiences, search his posts. You will have to set up your own game elsewhere. You are perceived as Beta in the context you describe. That's not bad in itself, in that you have the opportunity to learn there. But you won't get your lays there. You have to keep your friends groups segregated: it's ok to be the learner in one group, but you'll have to build your own thing elsewhere, where you're the top dog. /U/oooKenshiooo has also written good stuff about it.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/23 05:09 AM
6

See the education stats. The lower education men have, the more probable it is that they remain unmarried. It's women driving it, not men. (Sadly, I would add.)
/r/MensRights02/07/23 09:53 AM
28

"Don't run, we are your friends" - Mars Attacks. Also, women arguing.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/23 10:56 AM
2

Have you checked Woujo's book, Transcending the Tribe? You might find it helpful. Basically, you offer women your inner emotional experience. This, needless to say, must be attractive. So, you first get content, then get women.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/23 07:46 AM
3

Men and women are different. This means they have evolved different psychic structures. It's neither by accident nor by "misogyny" that original humanism refered exclusively to men. There has never been a functional society in which women held so much power as they do today.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:07 AM
54

Highest quality post I've seen in a while.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/23 03:26 PM
6

First step, though, would be to stop seeking studies to confirm your conformation bias regarding the non-existence of the female in-group favoritism.
/r/MalePsychology26/06/23 05:58 AM
7

Can you be a bit more constructive here? Can you point to any better research that demonstrates the female in-group bias?
/r/MalePsychology26/06/23 03:10 AM
3

Lower class men promising freedom to women in the hope that women for some reason will hump them.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 05:15 PM
34

Great post. It's imperative to fix your logistics before you hone your game. It's easier too: logistics are arranged at offline time, while game is a performance.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/23 02:02 PM
1

A man may bail. Women need their own, personal, children in order to feel forever cared for.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 07:57 PM
23

It's evolutionary. Think about the sexual dynamics. What can a low-status male offer her, except perhaps a lower-quality offspring which would squander her reproductive resource? There was a perceptive article over at A Voice For Men, by a woman MRA, who explained that the default disposition of women against the average man is disgust - which makes sense, once you realize the immense part sexuality covertly plays in mammals - apes - humans.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 03:57 PM
2

I've been advancing the idea that sex was or less free and communal in prehistoric hunter-gatherers, so I might as well give you my view of the "alpha male". The central notion is that evolved sexuality of women (and men) has a pre-human origin. It even has a pre-mammalian origin as well. The consequence is that women aren't "fine-tuned" for the extended provision for them and their children that civilization has afforded them with marriage etc. At their very deep core, they just want to mate wi…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/23 01:57 PM
67

Sorry for your loss, mate... For women that denounce "toxic masculinity", it's strange how much more they prefer their man when he's intoxicated.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 07:16 PM
17

Ouch, we might have a Captain Save a O's family. This can't end well. Generally speaking, going "NC", No Contact with your family is a thing. The problem is, of course, this can't be your decision, it must be hers, otherwise she'll later accuse you of... whatever. Right now, you are saving her from her family, in a capacity. Which means, protecting her from reaching the point to break free from them. You are enabling her to continue her current relationship dynamic with her family. Fiancé? As in…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/23 07:13 AM
0

Source?
/r/MarriedRedPill14/06/23 06:58 PM
2

Attachment styles have been proposed for and initially studied in children. There's an inconclusive debate going on regarding whether they apply to adults. Some research has shown that attachment style does carry over to adulthood for women (I guess because they are more childish) but not for men (I presume because men's sexual strategy doesn't piggy back on children's care eliciting behaviors, as it does in women). It's still an open question, though.
/r/MarriedRedPill14/06/23 06:42 AM
-2

I doubt that there be any scientific truth in it. There's no such thing, as per your own words. So why read it? Of course that's crazy land, and I don't want to be sucked in that field, so I regress.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 12:40 PM
-4

Oh, hi there Medieval Time Traveler, and welcome to the 21st century! You'll find that things have changed quite a bit in the last 1000 years or so... First off, lead can't be turned to gold, after all. Royals have red blood like anyone else, not blue. I'll let you discover the other wonders of our world on your own!
/r/MensRights13/06/23 05:02 AM
-4

Of course men need sex, and they need it much more than women. It's not a "stereotype", it's a well-documented scientific truth. And there's nothing to be ashamed about that.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 08:47 PM
2

(Clinical) depression is different than loneliness, which is what your brother has. waiting for "the one" Buy him an escort.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 06:26 AM
13

Look at it from the evolutionary perspective. Women gave birth to a human carrying half your genes. From a biological perspective, that was quite a huge contribution. Add that there was no marriage back then, and the man could, and usually did, bail after 2-3 years, so she had to raise the kid alone, or, usually, by exploiting another man. With so much biological investment, doesn't it make sense that women evolved to be social takers? Obviously, even if you don't have kids, these ancient adapta…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/23 03:05 AM
17

Nowadays you can get (whatever women bring) for free or, in any case, much cheaper than a marriage. Whytf marry?
/r/MensRights04/06/23 06:10 AM
-1

One of your sources contradicts himself. He claims that pre-agriculture gender relations seem bad. And then gives this contradictory example: For example, most societies seem to have no possibility for female leaders, and limited or no female voice in intra-band affairs.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 06:11 PM
1

Paddington. It's funny too.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 06:11 AM
1

You can THINK ABOUT THE OTHER GUY. Nah. Due to the difference in the sex drives, women are practically the sole selectors when it comes to sex. All the responsibility lies with her.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 01:20 PM
7

This. Even worse, if by some miracle every man did it right, it still wouldn't solve the problem, as long as women's female strategy remains unbridled: they would still go for the top-little-percent.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/23 09:31 AM
34

That's how you use paid sex to depedestalize pussy. Well played, man.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/23 04:13 AM
78

LoL you haven't figured out the ruling class yet. There's no way he's referring to circumcision.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 08:36 AM
2

Interesting... Source? In Paxton's "The anatomy of fascism" he writes that some Jews were part of Mussolini's party in Italy, early on.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 12:21 PM
1

And plus a cheating woman can chose abortion but a cheating man can not. Yeah... But he should.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 02:04 PM
10

Of course it's different. We men can't be pregnant and burden our partner with a child that's not hers. She can. So, it's different. Female infidelity is more severe.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 06:04 PM
17

u/throwingaway1394 this. Judging from your post, there seems to be nothing wrong with "your brain" per se. It's the way you've found to cope so far. Seems now you are ready to level up, and find more healthy ways. Therapy would help in your case, but as /u/oooKenshiooo writes, the major move would be to change your environment.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/23 10:15 AM
3

simply create a facade, a theater show You understand that you are describing psychopaths, right?
/r/MensRights06/04/23 02:35 PM
1

I just want to treat me like a human being. Treating you as inferior is an emotional way for them to express their sexuality. It's not only about sex, you beast, emotionality is important!
/r/MensRights31/03/23 11:16 AM
1

You bastard, now you've ruined it.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/23 07:51 AM
9

Since we're making predictions... Don't feel surprised if they outlaw VR sex, because it will "objectify" women. I don't see them giving even this sexual outlet to men. They have outlawed prostitution, after all, while pushing for a normalization of hard drugs. The elite has been using access to females as their hard currency for millenia. Hard to see how they are going to change that.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/23 08:28 PM
13

They are making them a bit too realistic...
/r/MensRights27/03/23 04:04 PM
4

Very interesting! Thanks.
/r/MalePsychology25/03/23 07:09 AM
7

I've been roasted even in MRA circles for saying so.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 10:41 PM
4

No man should go about life without having read that book.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 06:29 PM
15

...and if he ever gets hungry, he'll just slaughter the fucker
/r/MensRights05/03/23 06:28 PM
6

The Feminist Reich has really picked up steam.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 06:23 PM
5

I have my bros I was scanning for this. If you have bros and can spin plates, that's as good as it gets. Even in the old "golden" era of monogamy, the ideal couple was composed of three: the man, the wife and the mistress. It was tasteless otherwise. What you now lack is some plan of life, a greater purpose in life. This is not found in the sexual marketplace. It typically has to do with politics, art or science. Some people even pursue money, but that will probably feel hollow too when you get …
/r/TheRedPill02/03/23 03:48 PM
10

As far as excitement goes, nothing compares to the infatuation phase. You can't re-create it with "hobbies" or with "being more interesting". You've fallen in love, and that has made you shift your perspective and priorities. That's normal, it's how we men are built. It's the bait that leads us to the marriage trap. Alas, the glass is already broken. She will enjoy the good parts of what you have, and then will move on. It's what's women do, these days. Better than locking you in and then bitchi…
/r/TheRedPill22/02/23 04:55 AM
6

I've found that /r/malementalhealth is useful. Although it is not free from feminist-minded men, quite some contributors there make helpful comments.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 04:51 AM
1

why more men are ... sociopaths The corollary would be, of course, that women in general are more sociopathic (to make for the more even female distribution). Which, seeing the manipulativeness, seems to be the case.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 07:16 PM
22

Felt good to read this bro, way to go!
/r/TheRedPill08/02/23 02:24 PM
93

Here's a thought hack. Imagine these girls had terminal cancer, didn't know it, and had just a few days to live. Wouldn't you want to give them a few fun, exciting moments? There's a reason it's called game. Girls want to pretend there's a world without consequences, no judgement, where they can be free to do whatever they want - - and that is to express their evolved sexuality. There's a part of you that corresponds to that, so you use it when interacting with them. These girls, and all of us, …
/r/TheRedPill07/02/23 05:46 PM
1

Madness is stronger than reason, and this goes for relatives too. Disengage and, best case scenario, be receptive when/if she comes to.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 04:58 AM
5

Purpose is related to the other missing half of the equation, belonging. Your lifestyle is different from most people by necessity, so it's difficult to empathize with them. And the world of conspicuous consumption has something inherently superficial, so not much substance there. There are two ways to connect with, basically, humanity, to reclaim the broken link to the world: (I don't think artificial scarcity and doing your own chores will do it.) Art and science.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/23 12:04 AM
10

Meaninglessness is not an existential reality - however much existentialists want to claim that. It's a condition of feeling alienated from society. And society has indeed become alienating against men. Back in the old hunter gatherer tribe you had your band of brothers, and you had the chance to select how much to exert yourself striving for "the common good" (of the band), giving you recognition, status , and women. Nowadays you can't really compete with the idealized likes of a rock pop star.…
/r/TheRedPill19/01/23 06:34 AM
4

Ah, what the pick-up community has been advocating as a first step since two decades...
/r/MalePsychology13/01/23 03:55 PM
13

You should watch The Red Pill documentary, made by an inquisitive feminist. It's available on YouTube for a small pay.
/r/AntiFeminists13/01/23 04:22 AM
13

Rollo wrote that effort is better put on cultivating new prospects rather than trying to salvage an dead one. It's usually only worth it when there are kids involved. (Btw, if kids enter the picture, it's going to be much, much worse.)
/r/MarriedRedPill09/01/23 10:43 PM
1

Paternity tests should be mandatory.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 05:59 AM
3

Since we have some common history, this might save you a couple of years of answer seeking.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 05:06 AM
5

Feminists have helped society by proving that feminism is a hate ideology. This allows society to move past it, something that is now, at least theoretically, possible.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:17 AM
31

It's about "being in the moment". Relaxing excercises might help. If you're naturally introverted, you can't compete with extroverted guys, so don't do competing then. It will help if you are perceived to be of high value, people will give you more attention and extraversion will come easier.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/22 02:37 PM
10

If you truly loved her, you would be happy that her pussy is getting wrecked by another man.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/22 12:02 PM
11

You apparently fail to appreciate what a higher human being that man is. /s
/r/TheRedPill25/12/22 11:20 AM
3

It's only the abstract, and in any case the article is difficult to assess, because the notion of "equality" has been so diffused that needs to be defined any time it's used.
/r/Male_Studies22/12/22 02:36 PM
1

You've got the need of belonging. Neither the frail today's family, nor the current gynocentric society can give that to you. A way to go about it is to cover your belonging need with your mission and friends. Your mission gives you a worthy cause to work towards. I guess it replaces your current expectations from a "traditional family". It needs to be a pro-social cause, relevant to a "good" version of what society should be by your standards. Beside this intellectually stimulating pleasure, yo…
/r/TheRedPill10/12/22 08:33 AM
-6

Guys, I think we might have misunderstood de Beauvoir... Wouldn't you too like a wife so submissive that she would seduce other young women and introduce them to you? Sure, she might make up some crazy ideology as a compensation for her submission, but, hey, you can't have it all, and, in light of everything she brings on the table, or the bed, it's no big deal.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 05:13 AM
5

Good for you, best of luck, but don't generalize.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/22 03:20 PM
10

See here, guys? You can be a total goof and get tail, if you play it cool. (Everything you wrote above is so wrong... Except if you are being ironic?)
/r/TheRedPill19/11/22 06:48 AM
37

Lol! This. Guys with the fast life scenario are the ones that do most of the fucking nowadays. Guys that dedicate their life to building their "empire" more often than not have half of it taken away in divorce, because she is "unhaaapy" and craves the fun guy, not dull-boy Jack. This is not to advocate the fast life scenario, though. Working towards your security is good for you. It's to remind you guys to prioritise yourselves, and to not commit to a woman. Reproduction is way overrated. Just f…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/22 02:57 AM
6

Nah, it's not ignorance. It's gender chauvinism.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 09:00 AM
4

We say "don't marry". But let me make it a bit easier, for starts: "don't marry, at least until you're 40".
/r/TheRedPill10/11/22 05:08 AM
4

there are still some very good woman out there Definitely. Probably thousands. (The female population in the US is about 150 million).
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:50 PM
3

the lion's share of men's problems in a modern society is caused by feminist actions The problem is that the other feminine movement, the traditionalist women, was just as bad. It was the reason behind the first men's movement. And historical memory needs to be maintained. Which means that every feminine movement is anti-male. This stems from basic female sexual psychology (the dualistic mating strategy). Men generally love women, women don't generally love men. You can't cheat history, and can'…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 06:37 PM
21

LoL just a year and a half, and got out without children too. Dude, you got an expensive lesson for free. Lucky bastard. Remember that next time you're thinking of commitment. She's never yours, it's just your turn.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/22 05:57 PM
0

I once saw a device that you use during excercise, that limits the air intake so that your lungs get progressively stronger. That, might make sense. But limiting your oxygen intake while you sleep? I'm all in for questioning the status quo and everything, but don't be a jackass.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/22 08:55 AM
5

Doesn’t your eyes get damaged in the long run from prolonged exposure to uv rays? That was my thought too. Looking directly at the sun is another thing that sounds stupid.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/22 09:05 PM
0

taping my mouth shut Sounds scary af. Tbh, sounds quite crazy. What if your nose blocks or smthg? Better stick to proven medical solutions. Lose weight, excercise etc.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/22 09:02 PM
1

Men of the lower classes die younger than the respective women. In upper class, they have the same life expectancy. So, it's not biological, it's due to morenopression. Happiness measurements show that women are happier than men, almost all around the world.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:10 AM
2

What happened historically with Nationalism, is the same with what happened with Feminism. There was once a "good" Nationalism, a romantic idea that the nation would unite - against, usually, the aristocracy, and then the different nations would come together and collaborate. Of course, bacause Nationalism is a bourgeois ideology and you can't trick history, once the nations formed, they started warring with each other. Similarly, there was, until recently, a "good" feminism, in which women woul…
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:07 PM
1

MeToo was for feminism what the burning of the Reichstag was for the original Nazis in the '30s.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 12:19 PM
13

When you have kids your worry won't be that she takes half your wealth, but that she takes your kids away. Think about your daughter having a "second daddy".
/r/MensRights18/10/22 06:20 AM
1

You'll be able to have a discussion with her on equal grounds when you have made your independence. Until then, you can't fully express your opinions, and she probably can't fully appreciate them.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 12:42 PM
3

You are supposing that women are capable of the same kind of love with men, i.e. sacrificial love. Evolution doesn't work this way. Females are programmed to acquire resources (back in the evolutionary era these were supposedly redirected towards their kids after the man left). So now they are doing what they are programmed to do. As soon as they acquire the resources, sponsored by law this time, they work the workhorse husband as much as he can go, then leave him for greener pastures. Doesn't i…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 11:02 AM
1

The end game for your plough-working ox is not the you grow old together, is that you eat it. "Divorce" just means that she feels she has extracted the maximum possible within marriage, and divorce laws make the move profitable. Couple that with "I love you but I'm not in love with you", i.e. the fact that for women only the lustful and the idealized-romantic form of Love exists, not the caring one, and there you have it.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 03:34 AM
1

"What you say doesn't really make sense". Delivered in a non-offensive, matter-of-fact way.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 04:00 AM
2

Nature and life circumstances produce various enduring psychological diversions. If feminism is indeed one, it's the System's ultimate darling. And, contrary to other diversions that were defeated in a war, this time it threatens to consume the whole world practically unchallenged.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 06:39 PM
1

Where is sex in this list? Have you omitted it so that it doesn't eclipse the rest or something? I mean, was its omission intentional? Or do you really think that the issue of sex is not among "the most important for men and boys today"? Or did you omit it in order not to get into the eye of the mainstream and become a target yourself? These are real questions.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 07:36 AM
8

MRP Don't marry. It's a losing move. You might end up making a virtue out of necessity. End up claiming "I'm a real man, look, I'm taking responsibility for a creature that doesn't have the capacity to appreciate it, ain't I manly?" I can understand the existential impasse that leads men to have children. That way they can be the chiefs of a mini-tribe and feel good about it. However, the manly thing would be to acknowledge the impasse, rather than deny it in a mirriad ways. Over at MRP... Let's…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/22 04:22 AM
6

You've got to realize this is a bit too biased towards the American experience. A man is supposed to have buddies that have his back, at least in most of the world. You've internalized your mentally sick mother's mantra too much. Cutting her out completely from your life should be an option.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 12:03 PM
8

Haven't you checked Netflix or Amazon Prime recently? Of course it's orchestrated. Female leads everywhere. It might have taken them a few years to fully commit, but now we're there.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/22 08:32 PM
2

I can't see a normally functioning man looking at his relationship in this way. We are sacraficial lovers by out own nature, not mercinary like this. Definitely. That's the problem. You've got to be a natural psychopath to cope in this toxic gynocentric environment, or, at the least, simulate being one. Having the woman divorce you when no kids are involved, is, maybe, hard. Having her kidnap your kids and use them as emotional tampon is enough to break any normal, healthily self-sacrificing man…
/r/TheRedPill06/09/22 03:02 PM
1

True that... Although, before having children, you have the great option to take the good years and hit the EJECT button. Btw, OP has a quite unhinged post history. He's probably fantasizing anyway.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/22 02:23 PM
7

For Christ 's sake, don't have kids. Not with her, at any rate. If she got so comfortable after only one year of marriage, what would she do when she has your children as hostages?
/r/TheRedPill05/09/22 09:47 PM
12

Not the first, Esther Vilar was much earlier.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 12:49 PM
2

It's not the bluff. It's the total disregard for others. Their utilitarian, rather than compassionate, use of empathy.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/22 02:22 AM
2

Pure psychopaths, yes. There's what I call the normative female psychopathy, though. Located in a part of the woman's psyche (the evolved brain). It has a mind of its own. It activates when she needs it, and usually subsides with Alpha fucks.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/22 10:01 PM
0

turning into the invisible spinsters By the time a woman reaches old age, she's either bitter and depressed (finally gets a hint of how she's fucked up her and her children's life), or crazy (never got that hint), or submitted to a worthy man.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/22 09:06 AM
17

Lovey dovey therapy only "works" if you are physically attractive. It essentially easies your stress and lets you reap the rewards of your attractiveness. Watch out with psychologists, because most of them don't really have a realistic view of gender issues.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/22 04:08 PM
3

Check out this too https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/c6d04y/what_if_women_dont_love_even_their_own_children/
/r/TheRedPill29/08/22 02:44 PM
5

It's been known at least since Kinsey's research. The finding was that "given the chance, almost no man would be monogamous". But since you don't want children, you are probably going to be ok, even if she is the one to get bored and initiate divorce further down (the world average is 3.5 years into marriage).
/r/MarriedRedPill27/08/22 05:56 PM
3

Agreed. Seen from a systemic perspective, the ending was fitting. That's why I hated it. It justified all mainstream preconceptions. Punishment as salvation, and above all, the woman as a vector of morality. Peter Wright writes a lot about this, men's tendency to idealize women and seek redemption through submission to her highness.
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/22 08:56 AM
2

Up to the finale, I might kind of agree. They completely reversed it at the end, though. Redemption though deference to The State and The Woman. Maybe more traditionalist than woke, but definitely a mainstream, moralistic turn.
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/22 07:52 AM
3

Based on the upvotes, it seems that the rate of paranoids ("He wants the video so that he can then go beyond limits and rape you unpunished") versus rationals ("He is just a kid that saw a tik-tok video about consent and got scared") is 10 to 1.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 07:57 PM
3

Man, if you are 40 and she is 80, she is either joking indeed, or completely nuts. In any of those two cases, you should keep your cool.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 11:23 AM
1

Coudn’t have anything on me without looking up my profile couldn’t you. No. The ratio on your post says enough. Ah, I see you did the exact same! Lol It’s not only my opinion. Why would you need other people's opinions to validate your own? Anyway, have a nice week You too, mate. Don't take it too personal. This is the internet, we are all anonymous here - that's why we can discuss these things.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/22 07:24 AM
2

Ah, the redeeming quality of humbling yourself before The State... Represented by the esteemed judge, ... a woman! Who would expect that!? Sure, that too.
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/22 06:26 AM
4

Then maybe go read the origins, they are still there, instead of asking PurplePillers for advice? Normally I'd say "produce the quality posts you want yourself", but it seems that's not applicable here. And here's a free tip: It's that whining attitude that's holding you back.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/22 04:54 AM
1

I view things from a section of TRP, MGTOW and MRA perspectives. Do what's good for you. But don't excert yourself too much for women. And, when you can, do something for your fellow men, it makes society better. I get quite a pushback from the ultra-individualist guys, but that's fine. Anyway, almost any production is rage-inducing nowadays, I can't watch anything. This thing won't stop. Feminism has gone full fourth-reich. Women über Alles.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/22 12:08 AM
2

It's a 20-lines text script man, I didn't do the production of LOTR... You are rather correct about the plot. I lost the rationale behind it that you highlight. Not only because the whole last series was a bit off,, but because of the out of the blue moralistic turn. I probably refused to follow it. Not everything on this planet is because of cucks and this bad bad woke world. No, not everything. But the important stuff, is. My point, that there's a cultural battle going on and it makes sense to…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/22 11:10 PM
1

Supposedly, even a psychopath seeks and gets absolution by sacrificing for a woman. But I think I didn't get my point through. I'm giving an example of diverting the mainstream narrative. Think men with kids. What show would you let them watch?
/r/TheRedPill24/08/22 08:23 PM
15

to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals For some reason, this brought "feminists" to mind
/r/AntiFeminists23/08/22 01:42 PM
10

Aye, the "don't demonize women" rule, fashionable in some subs. Illiterate simps. Can't realize that women have evolved to be a certain way, and when you have a toxic (feminist) society, it activates the toxic part in them. Women that are sympathetic to men are exceptions, and they have become so by exceptional circumstances. There's the bulk of the distribution, and there are the outliers. But idiotic Political Correctness gets us banned for not concurring that every woman is a snowflake.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 08:57 AM
61

The morbid realization of the psychopath that deadness is not out there, but something she carries around inside her.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/22 01:11 PM
66

That's exactly what happened to her. She would have to completely change her viewpoint and switch sides in order to maintain her sanity. Considering she was a lesbian, it's possible that her unconscious convictions about the sexes were too strong for that (this usually happens through a mother not being able to appreciate her husband, this setting the example for her daughter).
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/22 06:14 AM
4

Her book is interesting, but suffers from a gloomy mood. Vincent never came through to the conclusion that men are the oppressed sex, a fact which, I'm afraid, led to her mental issues and the terrible conclusion. She could sympathize with men, and that's much more than the average woman is capable of, but she couldn't side with them, as e.g. Esther Vilar did. She couldn't really count us as her own. We, on the other hand, are proud to count her as our own.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 07:54 AM
32

Maybe it’s a functional model for promotion instead of stagnancy. Spot on. Women just want one thing: more.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 07:02 AM
1

I read your post more closely. Is it possible that it doesn't distinguish enough between adaptiveness of "sexuality", as you define it for the two sexes, during the evolutionary Adaptedness era, vs it's adaptive value today? Isn't it pretty obvious that women, initiating the overwhelming majority of divorces around 3-4 years into the marriage (See Helen Fisher's "Anatomy of Love") are damaging their children? It may be that the female sexual drive was tuned primarily to make them profit off a ma…
/r/MensRights16/08/22 06:34 PM
1

small compartmentalized domains in which a female majority or a male majority is generated by simple marginal innate differences There's a huge difference in the sex drive. Can't be bridged with liberal measures.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 02:16 PM
25

Yup, harems. The average man out of a relationship is lonely and sexless, while the average woman is "on vacations", getting no-strings-attached sex from a man way above her own value.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 04:46 AM
-11

... so that she now has evidence based reasons to be unhappy... Dr Helen Fisher, "the world expert in Love", a woman, said it quite clearly: "we are not an animal built to be happy, we are an animal built to reproduce". Edit: a note to the downvoters: Sending her "for therapy", in today's environment, most probably means sending her to a feminist. Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 03:25 PM
20

If you want love then you'll spend all of your time working to get her and then to keep her happy. If you provide the returns of your work to have her, it is usually called "the most ancient profession in the world", not "love".
/r/MensRights02/08/22 02:45 AM
1

I'm interested in the evolutionary perspective. At some point in the evolutionary tree of the human species, family came into existence. When was that? How did it evolve? What are the evolutionary adaptations around it, that are still in operation in men and women? It seems to be an open question. Scientists haven't managed to answer it yet. Nevertheless, many theories take it for granted, not bothering to examine if there's a mismatch between our evolved adaptations and the current situation. H…
/r/Male_Studies01/08/22 03:54 AM
1

Here's a great analysis of Wokeism https://youtu.be/GnUqrF9mAA8 It's basically the liberals virtue signaling.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 04:55 PM
2

I'm still looking for some good resource on the evolution on the family. Evopsych kindof takes it for granted, but where is the discussion on how it came to be?
/r/Male_Studies30/07/22 02:47 AM
2

Dear John, I appreciate your work on men's health. I think you are doing very crucial work, with worldwide implications. Anyone doing such a far reaching work, though, should have in mind that it limits his expression in other areas. Take e.g. example from Rollo Tomassi. He's quite conservative, but he doesn't do political analyses because it would smudge his main message. Vaccine scepticism is quite a controversial issue. There is no reason to estrange people from your main men's mental health …
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:55 PM
3

Neolithic France had a population of a few dozen thousands of humans. For comparison, today it's about 70 million. Back before the last Ice Age, at the Evolutionary Adaptedness Era, the world was vast and food was plenty. The situation you describe did come about, some tens of thousands of years later. Besides the climate change of the time, the reason was, I believe, that modern women claimed and got a sexual veto - which upended the prehistoric gender balance and led, predictably, to violence.…
/r/TheRedPill27/07/22 12:46 PM
9

Suffering IS in our nature. Bullshit I don't agree. Let's go back for a minute. Consider a tight group of prehistoric hunter "band of brothers". They go out hunting together. They have a blast. They come back to the camp, share the food with the women, get laid. They have a blast. Women start to become boring. Men go out hunting. They have a blast. Repeat. This "suffering is good" mentality has come about when our energy got connected to, well, The Matrix, so that the elite can profit (and fuck)…
/r/TheRedPill27/07/22 05:48 AM
3

I've found that Evolutionary Psychology helps immensely in understanding the fundamentals of male (and female) psychology. David Buss' EP: The new science of the mind is a good introduction.
/r/MalePsychology23/07/22 03:52 AM
4

Have you seen Mars Attacks? Don't run, we're your friends!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/22 03:44 AM
24

the closer you get to a woman, the more of this shit you'll have to deal with. One of the major stimulation input for the female attraction adaptation (a module called previously "instinct" or "drive"), is unfamiliarity. You probably feel that too: your school classmates weren't so attractive as those girls from the visiting school. For women, who will carry the child, this incest aversion mechanism is much stronger. As a consequence, in this time when all other societal inputs to that female mo…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/22 03:16 AM
1

the men who came back from the trenches voted against the war-mongering Hitler and he lost among the male voters but he won the women's vote in tremendous numbers that brought him into power That's a fascinating piece of info! Source?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 06:47 AM
0

Let me note here that Alpha and Beta are not male-oriented, objective terms refering to gene quality. They are about female feelings and these are fickle. The Alpha of today may very well be the Beta of tomorrow, and (much more rarely) vice versa.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/22 03:36 PM
3

And if the fetus (as a legal entity with legal rights) doesn't have consent to be inside a woman's body, she is allowed to remove it. Sounds incredibily stupid as an argument. proposed by Eileen Aha. That explains it. Alternatively, we could try to educate the religious about cellular division and the development of the central nervous system in a fetus. Regarding the man's rights, I'll just note that Herb Goldberg, even back in the '70s, has proposed that a man should have a right to *demand ab…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/22 02:31 AM
3

Lmao no
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/22 09:54 PM
3

D&AW series pt 1 by HOA. Yes, but why go through all that hassle? (Unless you've got kids that you have to protect from your wife's emotional canibalism).
/r/MarriedRedPill10/07/22 05:16 PM
1

I sent you a (long) pm about it. I'm not sure I'm allowed to describe masculinity in positive traits that femininity lacks :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/22 04:30 AM
1

It's not that the current Left stands a chance to change. The way to change it is, of course, to burn it down and build it anew. LWMA, as an example, can be considered as a first step. Perhaps ironically, because it is currently much to the right, I consider the Red Pill as contributing to such a perspective, in the sense that it teaches men to monitor and control their tendency to self-sacrifice (for women). As Roy Baumeister put it, society (and capitalism is type of it) is built on exploiting…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/22 04:27 AM
25

I was dismayed to see a section on the last International Men's Right Conference directed against abortion rights. The feminist haripies have been attacking a level-headed, left-wing approach such as that of Dr Warren Farrell for so long, they ended up with pushing the MRM towards the far right. It is imperative for the Left to rid itself of feminism and gyno-centrism, and see reality for what it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/22 06:03 AM
1

Inherently. The old "blank slate" hypothesis, central to the Left, has been completely disregarded by modern evolutionary science, backed by neuroimaging and endocrinology. You can view masculinity as a gravitational force that draws males towards a core of male traits - while femininity is another planet. Historical conditions and individual differences influence where one ends up - and some are born to another planet. But the gravitational force is there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/22 12:52 PM
1

I really don't think there's anything "deep" to understand in there. It's a collection of curated identities from which people are supposed to choose and wear. And like all fashions, they change quicker than you can get a grab on them. It's the postmodern narrative, whose only real core is "you can't understand or change the world". Right now, the narrative is centered around demolishing everything around masculinity, because masculinity aspires to objectivity, to the external world. It's not a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/22 05:16 AM
4

An ultra-individualistic view of humans has been mainstream for too long, but the truth is that human society is, itself, an organism. Our lives, as members of it, are interconnected. So much so, that those that feel worthless and a nuisance to society, remove themselves from it. The victims of suicide, 4/5 of which are male, are a testament to it. A small percentage chooses to do it with company. It's terrible and despicable, but the numbers say that suicide is the real problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/22 04:43 PM
2

Yep, it's really impossible to define No it isn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/22 07:28 AM
10

Of course
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/22 04:52 PM
23

Thanks for what you are doing. This is pioneering work. I still have some issues in that area to work out At your disposal if there's anything that's still puzzling you real hard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/22 04:34 PM
11

Indeed starts with childhood neglect and abuse. There are two potential vectors, of neglect and abuse, the mother and the father. An extreme case of abuse is e.g. when the mother deprives a boy of his father via divorce, in order for her to live with her lover. On the other hand, a father may neglect or abuse his son as an outlet to his own rage of being abused and deprived all his life. Etc etc. But that's not all of the story. Men, especially in the US, lack friends, and close friends at that,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/22 11:02 PM
8

Your book Transcending the tribe was superb, can't wait to read the next one.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/22 07:42 PM
0

Straightphobia too...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/22 03:44 AM
2

This. A lot of "progressives" of the "bodily autonomy" crowd supported the exact anti-vax positions of the far-right, and with the same arguments!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/22 04:45 AM
5

This comment might seem logical, but if you change "ear piercing" to Female Genital Circumcision, it gets clear that it is not. It was (feminist) Germaine Greer that did her own research in Africa, and realized, to her horror, that it was usually women that supported the practice. As it turns out, and as she wrote,, it is something that women do on other women, and not something that men do on women. The ferocity with which they establish their control on sexuality matters. See Roy Baumeister's …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/22 04:42 AM
25

The bodily autonomy discussion should start with the right of every soldier to deny being sent to battle. The rest are peanuts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/22 03:31 PM
10

Check out Steve Moxon's writings, he provides sources.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/22 01:31 PM
10

Fastest way to get banned from every physical and online space? "Male sexuality".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/22 02:08 AM
6

What they do, is their business. What you do, is yours.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/22 04:33 AM
9

I can't fathom his despair.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/22 01:28 AM
8

That's not what I said.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/22 01:28 AM
19

I'm (personally) not interested in violently face fucking a tied up chick while she chokes and gags on my cock... Why the heck not?
/r/TheRedPill21/06/22 12:37 PM
28

This. The famous "women prefer more feminine-faced men when not ovulating" finding. They do. But as girlfriends, not as studs.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/22 10:04 AM
4

Metoo... Chivalry... I dunno. Check out what was going on in 1930's in Germany, when there was a legal dispute between a national and a foreigner. I wouldn't call it chivalry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/22 09:26 PM
2

/u/oooKenshiooo got some books to recommend on these issues?
/r/TheRedPill04/06/22 07:43 PM
0

You beat me to it. Second in, then.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 12:18 PM
18

Fantastic post. /u/redpillschool , give this dude one more, well earned point please.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/22 09:14 PM
2

Lol at last, thanks! I was beginning to worry I wouldn't trigger anyone.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/22 01:58 PM
78

LoL. It's as you say. Too late, suckers. We've already cracked the code. They might hinder our reachout, but the truly great work, summarized by Freud's exasperated question "What does a woman want?", we've done it. Yeah, the answer is not pretty, but it's the truth. So long, and thanks for all the fish.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/22 07:27 PM
6

This might seem a bit psychoanalytic, but it is quite evident for me that the desire to "save western culture" is the infantile tendency to appease the Father - from those under, towards those above. "Look, dad, I'm picking after the mess you are doing, ain't I a good boy?"
/r/TheRedPill23/05/22 06:06 PM
5

The critical point is what humans' "natural state" is. The discussion will quickly start to revolve around sex, and I don't think this sub can take it. I'll just note that back in our evolutionary era of Adaptedness, the average man had much, much more power of sexual selectivity than today, and the average woman much, much less.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/22 02:21 PM
11

You've got some interesting ideas, but I think you have a somewhat biased thinking. Here's the main problem: Nature isn't humanistic. Humanism, in which all human beings, men included, are considered of equal value, is a human invention. In nature, whether we like it or not, females are the bottleneck of reproduction, and thus, for nature, they do have "higher value". It's a noble cause what you are trying to do, but in the end it doesn't calculate. All species have a cycle where they thrive and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/22 01:17 PM
4

Book therapy might work, and that's cheap enough. You can PM me your issues and I can give you pointers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/22 04:11 AM
0

I agree
/r/MensRights14/05/22 03:27 AM
7

Sports. Muscle mass and strength is perceived by women (and men), and is a factor of attraction. If he's stronger than most men, people can sense it and it greatly makes up for his lack of height.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/22 03:41 AM
28

After WWII the US explicitly forbade American men to send money to their out-of-wedlock kids they had with German women. So much for "the interests of the child"...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/22 09:56 PM
15

The Guardian + "Equality" = Go Girl I'm very sceptical of this. Martin van Creveld's research clearly showed that women were privileged throughout the historical years. Sure, in prehistory there was probably much more "cooperation" and equality between the sexes (meaning that women weren't so exorbitantly privileged as in historic times), but this was mainly before women acquired what Dr. Leonard Shlain called "the sexual veto".
/r/MensRights30/04/22 03:42 PM
-2

Have you single handedly decided that hysteria is not a thing? It has been an ongoing discussion in psychology that has not concluded yet. It might as well be very real. So, are you suggesting that "toxic masculinity" might be a real thing?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/22 06:27 AM
0

"Being productive" is not exactly synonymous with "having a big impact on the world". In capitalism, it's basically an alienating process. The thing is that "striving for greatness" is built in the male soul - according to Roy Baumeister. Men need to have a big impact on the world, in order to feel men. Capitalism hijacks it and diverts it to mudane, instead of creative, productivity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/22 02:30 AM
2

complex emotions You should meet my parrot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 12:09 PM
4

emotions are the things that make us human beings I'm not so sure about that. After all, animals do have emotions, but that doesn't make them human beings.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/22 05:49 AM
1

Liberalism is not necessarily compatible with humanism. In fact, liberalism inside capitalism is pretty much against humanism - see e.g. neoliberalism. For a consistent Left, the liberalism idea is to be implemented inside a liberated society. Otherwise, it's just hypocrisy, you can't be naively liberated when there are people starving on the sidewalk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/22 06:47 AM
16

Tribalism long predates capitalism. Yes. And not only that. Female primacy long predates capitalism too. What the feminist era has made clear is that humanism doesn't come naturally to humans. It's probably the greatest human idea, but it needs people to reach a certain existential level in order to be able to grasp its radical conclusion: that men have the same value, as human beings, with women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/22 03:02 AM
24

The Left is supposed to have an all-encompassing mindset, caring for the benefit of everyone in society. The Right, almost by definition, maintains that each should strive for their own benefit, and this antagonism is good. The first time I was deeply shaken about feminism is when, having researched men's issues, tried to explain them to an old feminist friend of mine, supposedly very left-wing. "You do your things, we'll do ours", was her answer. It's not so much that they don't know, it's that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/22 03:21 AM
13

It's one thing to support The Sisterhood (they do that), and another to support actual women. Kindof like Mafia: don't let the cops know, but killing each other is ok
/r/MensRights13/04/22 03:01 PM
31

It is quite clear which gender capitalism has picked for its darling. The hatred men face is an expression of class hatred. For every social class, being a woman is incomparably better than being a man. And it has been so for (well) ever, at least since humanity left the hunter-gatherer bands behind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/22 09:43 PM
1

Your ideology is not a factor for short term matching. (That would be your hotness.) You attract a man with your looks, you keep him with your character.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/22 06:39 PM
8

I've been thinking that using women as front line troops is a great idea. If someone revolts against it, they'd better revolt against war itself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/22 05:32 AM
8

This is written in a gender-neutral way, and it's difficult for me to read. It's as if "love" has the same meaning for both sexes.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/22 01:19 PM
9

Gynocentrism (that's what you are talking about) has indeed to do with reproduction. Part of it is about being a provider to your offspring, and it makes sense to perceive this dimension more acutely since your wife is pregnant, but recent Evopsych views male providing as mating effort, i.e. things you do before and in order to get her pregnant. The idea being, of course, that this providing (sometimes called the "Beta" strategy) did work at our evolutionary adaptedness era, when women were in a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/22 06:16 PM
0

I hear you. You are suggesting that, in the spirit of political correctness, you are monogamous because that's what you feel and define yourself to be. And you are also suggesting that I am projecting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/22 05:57 PM
1

People can choose to be vegan. That doesn't mean that the human species isn't omnivore. To address your question in ernest: I believe that most "monogamous" men are either making a virtue of necessity, or are very inexperienced and haven't seen the full spectrum of the male sexual feelings. There is no inherent "higher morality" in being monogamous, in any case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/22 04:21 PM
0

The data have been out since Kinsey's research, and it's crystal clear, but there are still people who deny it. That's where your downvotes come from.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/22 03:22 PM
1

I remember a quote from her saying something like "If men are supposed to have as many partners as possible then who are they having all this sex with?". Research has answered the question: Prostitutes. (Source: The Evolution of Desire, D. Buss).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/22 03:18 PM
3

Roy Baumeister said (quoting from memory) "I suspect that there is no sense trying to discuss with feminists".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 05:11 AM
2

You haven't mentioned if you have friends. That's where your answers lay, not in women.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/22 10:57 AM
3

Unvaccinated. Of course.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/02/22 06:19 PM
0

The reason is that she's a Marxist. (A true one, not a Stalinist caricature).
/r/TheRedPill04/02/22 05:19 AM
1

Common guys... "Feminism is the radical notion that women are human beings", everybody knows that.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 10:05 AM
18

When they say it's emotional labor for them, that's what is feels like. It's effortful, it's not instinctual or automatic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/22 08:57 PM
40

That's what MRA psychologist Tom Golden has found. He writes that although women say the want their men to open up, when they do, they recoil and lose attraction. That's also what psychologist John Townsend has found, he writes about it in What men want, What women want. "When you feel you protect a man, it feels incestuous, it's not good for the sex" is a report he got (I'm quoting from memory.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/22 08:55 PM
12

That, or (worse) people genuinely believe that women shouldn't be sent to wars, only men should.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/22 02:50 PM
15

Sometimes it feels like men could be dying en masse and society wouldn't give a shit about it and never acknowledge the problem. That's a hugely speculative hypothesis. I don't think there's any real-world scenario where men die an masse while women stay home writing letters to the warriors.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/22 01:35 PM
2

For a structured presentation of gender dynamics, with references, you could get my book, The Empress Is Naked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/22 01:43 PM
2

Another great post, thanks man. The interesting part is that I agree with all the prerequisites you describe for a LTR/Marriage, agree with the dynamics and how to handle it, but I strongly believe the juice is not worth the squeeze. It's probably because I never had the need to have kids: that is the only reason to get married, and for most men, it's a need brought about by the disolvement of any sense of belonging in the modern world. (Having children not a biological need for men, belonging i…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/22 05:02 AM
6

I've researched it. It's really quite a scandalous issue, because the life expectancy gap is around only for a couple of centuries. Before that, it was reversed (women died earlier), and if prehistoric data are an indication about the "natural" way of things, men are supposed to considerably outlive women. Class society marked the reversion of that natural trend, and capitalism skewed it ludicrously to the benefit of women. As you can all understand, I hope, life expectancies for men and women a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 06:55 PM
7

Die out due to no children born. Sorry to disappoint you here, but you are going to die whether children are born or not. Offering to replenish the workforce for the capitalists has been the favorite play by Conservatives forever. It has been taken up now by Feminists. There are sperm banks now, you know? The Left has been traditionally concerned with improving the life of actual people, not imaginary, non-existing ones. The bottom line is, you won't have any luck trying to appease the capitalis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 04:06 PM
1

still works long hours The classical Marxist class analysis of the "leisure" class needs to be modified. Excluding only a tiny percentage of the "elite", upper class men do work, and they work long hours. While their wives don't. Their wives suck out their "surplus value" - which those men in turn suck out of the lower class men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/22 08:51 PM
2

Self sabotage of the Blue Pillers is not stupid. It has a purpose - although they can't usually pin it down: screening out these kind of women.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/22 02:59 PM
10

the Red Pill is just another Blue Pill That's interesting, I've been having these kinds of thoughts myself. The Red Pill is, up to a degree, gynocentric too. It's "women want this, so give it to them so that you don't starve sexually and emotionally". Men that are able to use it as a tool have a point. Trying to draw more general social conclusions from it, though, fails spectacularly. Both traditionalism and ("progressive") feminism are gynocentric. There is no visible alternative, as of now. W…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/22 08:37 AM
2

/u/redpillschool this guy knows what he's talking about. Let's give him a point.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/22 02:52 PM
6

Quite an accurate insight.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 04:39 PM
6

That's some depressing news. Sex bias runs so deep in females, not even babies are spared.
/r/Male_Studies16/01/22 05:42 AM
22

Great post, man, thanks!
/r/TheRedPill16/01/22 05:37 AM
-1

Whoa... This is mind-shattering. It definitely proves that the majority of women aren't bothered by men crying.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 05:17 PM
-5

If you think this, you haven't been in a "serious/non-superficial relationship."
/r/MensRights12/01/22 09:00 AM
1

Shout-out to all you honorable traitors
/r/MensRights02/01/22 12:00 PM
8

I get you bro. I too got involved in this shit in order to fuck, and I'm close to getting myself a PhD now.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/22 06:59 PM
5

Trump will be disqualified from running for president by some underhanded method. Not going to happen. Remember that back in 2016 Democrats burned their own card, B. Sanders, who was the only candidate that could win Trump, effectively handing Trump the government. Sure, they hate him, but they hate "Commies" (center-right wing, by European standards) more. The "elite" have successfully setup a systemic polarization, with Trump, the far right, on the one side, and the politically correct, which …
/r/TheRedPill29/12/21 10:05 AM
2

You should read my book, The Empress is Naked. -Adam
/r/TheRedPill29/12/21 09:53 AM
2

You should check out the Vladimir (city) solution to the gender problem that the Bolsheviks implemented. Really cool. Search it in Sex at Dusk.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/12/21 03:21 PM
2

This and not only. We should stop treating kids as totally incapable of grasping higher order values, those that are needed for a societal-level functioning. When you train them with clique mentality, they end up only able to function in cliques.
/r/Male_Studies10/12/21 01:50 PM
1

Become an activist. You should probably check my post history (do the posts over at /r/theRedPill show? Or are they blocked by the quarantine?) I'll take your assertion that Mike would give the speaker a platform at face value, I might as well do it next year. But the problem is not that a "new" argument is needed. The reasons men should have a right to abortion were presented back in the '70s by Herb Goldberg, and they are as much valid today as they were back then. If Mike isn't convinced, it'…
/r/MensRights08/12/21 10:29 PM
0

You think of a lump of cells as a kid? What the hell is wrong with you? Go read some biology. Also, here's a disturbing thought: you are wasting millions of kids everytime you jerk off.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:12 PM
-6

Comparing a child, i.e. a human being, with a material possession is a very feminine thing to do.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 10:29 AM
0

The view that only people that have the prerequisites to live a happy life should be brought to life (which is obviously correct) does not entail that those that don't should kill themselves. When you're condemned to a life of struggle, though, you'd better direct your (let me.be a bit Freudian here) death drive, your "creative destruction", to the system that condemned you. The degree to which you fail to do that is the degree to which you are self-destructing.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 06:37 AM
1

You might have not had much experience with what wreckage the lack of a father can do to a kids soul.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 10:21 PM
1

No you've got a logical error somewhere there. The simple way to see it is probably a fetus that has organ malfunction, but can be brought to birth - and die in a few months. The best interest of the prospective baby would be abortion. Same thing with an about-to-be-born-orphan-from-father baby.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 09:16 PM
2

If the criterion is the best interest of the child, and the child has a right to both parents, then the decision should be towards abortion, in a dispute. Exceptions should include women who have medical issues, of course, on the premise that the man is dismissed of any financial obligation towards the child.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 08:34 PM
2

Me too (the Weinstein case) was for Feminism what the fire in the Reichstag was back in the '30s.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 11:06 PM
2

Looking forward to your review and to reading your book. I'd be glad to give you pre-publication feedback, should you want, make a note for when it's ready.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 02:11 PM
6

A simple "Thank you" would do.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/21 09:18 PM
1

Men's right to sexual intimacy is discussed by practically no one, not even the Men's Rights Movement.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 10:36 PM
5

The origins of male oppression (because that's what "Patriarchy" actually is) is not discussed nearly enough. It's older than the oldest texts I trace it back to the emergence of class society in my book, The Empress Is Naked. I'd be glad to send you a copy, PM me. -Adam
/r/MensRights19/11/21 03:58 AM
0

The discussion around the female notion of love is the most thorny one. The answer is indeed evolutionary.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:27 PM
20

Pity. It is a good article that, despite being long, actually summarizes basic facts about male-female interactions at work, and has value to offer.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/21 06:55 PM
3

because of how much I look up to my mom. So you know what's at the root of your problem. It's a standard problem of young men, and also a standard problem of most grown up men. The rhetoric of "mother's love" is too strong in society, so most boys can't reach the realization that it's normal for mothers to betray their sons for their own personal benefit - psychological, as in externalizing aggression, or sexual, as when advancing the female sexual strategy at the cost of their sons' male one.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 06:03 PM
2

A few things, but I would especially mention The Manipulated Man. You can't unread that book.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 10:12 PM
1

Hm... Deleted... Gender confusion sure spreads in Men's Rights too.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 05:12 PM
2

sex and sperm strike ... Three months, maybe six... OK this is clearly utopian!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights16/09/21 04:03 PM
1

Your "negotiation" approach allows you a viewpoint which can offer the Men's Movement some good insights, even though, I believe, it has been tried and failed. And it's continuously being tried and failing in each new relationship. Only power can defeat Feminism, just as only power could defeat Nazism.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 02:56 PM
1

In a sense, both the proposition of androcentrism and your lovism are kind of utopian, so the discussion gets a bit literary. But even if the latter is to be brought about, that would be through the former. It's not a matter of discussion, it's a matter of power. And women won't give their power up without being forced.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 12:14 PM
1

You know I appreciate your views, but the truth is that the Gordian knot of gender relations cannot be untied, can only be cut. Women like that girl are far and between.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 04:20 AM
3

The reason this feels strange is because of the stereotype that women love their children.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:37 AM
-1

The correct question is "should kids have a right to come to the world having a father"? I say yes. Paper waiver, even if it turns out 100% bulletproof, still leaves a kid fatherless. So men should have a right to demand abortion, both as a protection for themselves and to prevent a human being coming to life fatherless.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 05:30 PM
5

It’s just not something that people are trained to do – especially growing up in the US. I think US is actually a good case for cold approach. It has a "talking to strangers" culture, much more than e.g. Europe.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/21 04:52 AM
2

It's this old mixup in Evolutionary Psychology, that the authors of The Evolutionary Biology of Human Female Sexuality describe at length. More than half of the researchers can't differentiate between the adaptedness of traits at the time they evolved, versus their current function, which may be adaptive or not. That's a shame for the whole field, you've got to disect and put together again each study, to draw any probable useful conclusions.
/r/Male_Studies26/08/21 04:39 AM
5

I once overheard by chance a company of teenage girls chatting. "I hope we get a good husband", commented one. "A good divorce, you mean!" Hahahaha they all started laughing. It's a package now. It's marriage+divorce. Resources and then freedom to enjoy them with whomever they want. Plus, they get to condition their kids to take care of momma unhindered.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 02:01 PM
5

He is doing coaching. It's a perfectly respectable thing to do. Unless you have concrete evidence about his "scam website", stfu.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/21 09:19 AM
1

The legal rights perspective on Patriarchy is something, but imo not the most interesting aspect. We first need to trace back how we got to marriage and families, first extended, much later nuclear. What was before family? That's the route I took.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 08:25 AM
31

I watched the transformation of your viewpoint in your posts, in just a few short months, and I want to say that I'm utterly impressed. It's a thing I've only seen with a handful of women, and they are all exceptionally moral and intelligent. Thanks for your precious work. Adam
/r/MensRights21/08/21 01:53 PM
1

I understand. It's like telling a devout that God doesn't exist. Or telling Jeanne d' Arc that the voices aren't real.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 02:25 AM
2

From my quick reading, I don't think their data supports such a claim.
/r/Male_Studies20/08/21 04:55 PM
2

My only guess as to why they may be concluding that the difference is with the males rather than females is that in a lot of other studies the self-serving bias is present in both parties. I didn't get your argument.
/r/Male_Studies20/08/21 11:50 AM
0

If the female sex is privileged by nature, and there are biases evolved in both men and women, leading to gynocentrism, equality can only be implemented by oppresing these biases. E.g. as a first step, bring about measures that would equalize life expectancy by forcing women to undertake dangerous jobs. A form of obligatory social service.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 08:28 AM
7

"As a result of this socialization, men may simply be accustomed to attributing all of their outcomes, whether positive or negative, to internal factors. Even when they are unsuccessful, men may find it less disturbing to accept personal responsibility than to admit that they have lost control over their outcomes. Further work on the nature of the male sex role and its effects on behavior needs to be done." As I suspected. Their results are quantified, showing stronger external attribution in fa…
/r/Male_Studies19/08/21 04:08 AM
4

suggest the influence of an internality bias among men, rather than an externality bias among women Very sceptic of this, it'd be interesting to see how they made this distinction.
/r/Male_Studies19/08/21 03:48 AM
11

That is not the case. There are reports from members who literally had their lives saved in there.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 02:53 AM
6

The measure of censorship working is not so much whether they remove a particular article. It is whether they induce self-censorship: an internalization of fear, and a profound move towards the desired ideology. So let's say that the latest anti-male censorship move by Reddit was a huge success. Edit: Let's say that "sex is not a human need" is correct. Isn't intimacy a human need, though? And isn't sex a natural part of intimacy between the sexes? Sex has been a basic human need at least since …
/r/MensRights15/08/21 04:04 AM
15

getting the help they need One could say that communities like MGTOW and TheRedPill did exactly this: equip men in order to help themselves with the issues of intimacy they are struggling with.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 04:01 AM
10

It's rather the other way around: the systemic gender war has picked up steam after "mee too", leading to a relentless attack on men. Their anger is only a natural reaction, so calls for "intellectual" discussion instead is too comme il faut.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 10:18 AM
1

The sub was clearly toxic. Personally I don't care that it's gone. And we'd be hypocrites to continually rag on feminists to be better with self policing the hate and extremism in their movement if we didn't do the same ourselves. So to the sub. C'est la vie I'm just copying here your view about the ban of MGTOW. There seems to be some kind of irony or political naivete, here.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 02:18 AM
1

I was ran out So not banned, that's good ;) And that if all of that was made equal Yeah, not probable. Why would men toil away on soul-crushing jobs if they could get their needs (especially the sexual ones) easily met? You'd be talking about the collapse of capitalism.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:43 PM
3

Have in mind that we have readers with all kinds of political outlooks. Since the Left has fucked up so royally with regard to the gender issue, most men that find us here come from the Right - and, in my opinion, there lies the problem. Not that the "Left" (the US "Left" would correspond to center-Right in e.g. Europe), so not that the "Left" isn't racist: they'd use a Black actor in a movie anytime, to avoid building a hospital in a black neighborhood.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/21 03:31 PM
5

It's the reason we've set up https://trp.red Totally independent, censorship-free tribes can be setup, such as https://www.trp.red/feed/t/mgtow Go make/join a Men's Rights tribe just in case.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:50 AM
3

Seems counterintuitive, doesn't it? That's my point - and not whether one knows this notion or that. Unless you have worked with these kind of things, you don't understand them, even if you think you do. Who would have thought that we'd need nerdy maths to tell us that human society influences individuals eh? Do the drill with a prevalence of 0%, 100%, 1% and 99% to gain insight, see how the probability that you actually have the disease given a positive test changes dramatically, and see for yo…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/21 06:45 PM
2

The image they will have from you is not a source of authority but someone who mom blames all the time. This will be true regardless. Have your enemies close.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/21 01:18 PM
1

When kids are involved, divorce is not a solution. Unless you are OK with her fucking up your child unhindered - which is one of the main reasons that women orchestrate divorce after having kids.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/21 01:06 PM
7

You should ask that in forums.red, but yes, you are stuck and fucked. AWALT, the marriage is what's toxic. You need to read Saving a Low Sex Marriage.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/21 09:49 AM
4

As Kahneman put it, not only the layman, but not even statisticians are lousy intuitive statisticians. People try to wing it in all sorts of situations without realizing that their "hunches" don't work. I thought it'd be better for some young dudes to read about it in an anonymous forum, than find out themselves later in life. If that gives some guys a new perspective on how to approach knowledge, I'm happy.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/21 09:27 PM
4

The point of the post is that you can and need to mind your mind when doing "self-improvement", not to find the answer, but I guess it was inevitable to discuss the example itself. So what the heck, let's go whole hog: You either belong to the 30% of the sick, or to the 70% of the healthy. Your test is positive. It's either a true positive, or a false one. Assuming only 5% false positives, 100% of the sick (30%) come back positive, and you have 5% false positives on the 70% of the healthy popula…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/21 07:38 PM
2

No, you've got to calculate the 5% on the 70% that is healthy.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/21 06:20 PM
13

If this was a sub purely for sex I wouldn't post this. We are also interested in men's identity, and my point is not to "fake it" there.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/21 03:58 PM
1

I'll oblige, since you are a passer by from Men's Rights. Let's say the decimal part is ?.55% and leave the rest standing. (When the only chance of error is 5% false positives).
/r/TheRedPill02/08/21 10:26 AM
3

Better get expert help with that. Cases vary wildly, so the solution for you needs to be individualized.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/21 09:07 AM
1

two different things Never claimed they were the same. But let me rephrase that to avoid ambiguity.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/21 07:16 AM
9

Adds fun to my feed. Best comedy content on the internet!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/21 08:02 PM
50

I've also heard the "It's a pity society programs our kids to need a father." They literally feel they own their kids, everything is an object.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/21 01:41 PM
1

Although that emotional state you describe might feel alien to some men, all men are capable of it. Their problem is their conviction that they do not "deserve" it. So, they might leave aside the rational engagement with the world and be emotional after they've achieved something. "Now I can relax and have my piece of cake." Building a capacity and a sense of personal power, rather than being continuously slapped, helps with easing into the emotional mode more easily.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/21 05:39 AM
5

Since all class societies have been gynocentric (i.e. women have a right to sexual veto) I view MGM as an expression of hatred towards men. It has been neurologically shown that MGM induces trauma in male babies and boys (which is, of course obvious). The most illuminating case is the US, an extremely gynocentric society, in which MGM is institutionalized even in the absence of relative religious customs.
/r/Male_Studies31/07/21 02:31 AM
0

Maths is short for "mathematics" which is a science that has to do with, how do I put it, numbers, like for example how many fingers you have.
/r/MGTOW29/07/21 01:14 PM
3

The problem is not that men are derided for being "sex crazed". It is the denial of men's desire for sex as a normal thing. Something for which many MRAs are, unfortunately, guilty too.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 12:19 PM
0

You clearly don't understand math, so it'll be difficult to get that explained. But let me try. Why did you go MGTOW when there's a >1% percent of women that are decent?
/r/MGTOW29/07/21 05:23 AM
5

You beat me to it. Quality, effort post, adds value to this community.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/21 04:48 AM
4

You don't need to know that the vaccine is "safe". You just need to know that it's safer than the virus (times the probability that you catch it). That's basic engineering.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/21 09:22 AM
16

This is delusional. I see lots of young men LARPing "indestructible man", just to shut the fuck up after they've ruined themselves one way or another. I guess that's the connection between the He-man intro and the covid denialist fud that follows, although OP probably isn't conscious of it: the LARPing. Don't be an idiot. Get your vaccine. If you are afraid of it, learn fucking math. Read real studies: the danger from the virus is incomparably larger than the rare vaccine side-effects. Ignore th…
/r/TheRedPill26/07/21 05:42 AM
20

It's not. The simple answer is that we now have the conditions that allow capitalism a full-on attack against the middle class, and the middle class is predominantly white. That's why that attack has taken an anti-white flavor. What are these conditions? The Soviet Union has collapsed, no external pressure, so Western capitalism feels free to expand - towards the inside this time. The Left has been crushed, no internal opposition. What is called "Left" in the US is actually called Right in Europ…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/21 04:40 AM
3

You are overvaluing their ability to think forward and rationally.
/r/MGTOW23/07/21 03:49 PM
3

Exactly.
/r/MGTOW23/07/21 02:37 PM
3

the only way to make a woman not demanding after a while and continue to have a stable relationship with you is that you're amongst the top people in all the persons that she can date with. No, not even then.
/r/MGTOW23/07/21 11:20 AM
5

You are discrediting the fact that in our urban present, the stream of new men is unlimited. No need to not kill the ex-host.
/r/MGTOW23/07/21 08:21 AM
6

There's a reason we have a point system and Endorsed Contributors here. People come in with various half-digested ideas, so readers need to have a way to distinguish between solid and, let's say, provisionary information. Yours is a typical example of the second, an amalgamation of some good thoughts with many delusions. Your bane is going to be, of course, your traditionalist expectations. The bane of your kids, also.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/21 05:42 AM
2

Since when has 'fixing' capitalism been a goal of the left? Sadly, since long...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/21 05:58 PM
2

They'd rather end up in cats and delusion than quit their reproductive strategy before it's too late. Bad thing is, there are too many Betas to save them.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/21 04:13 PM
5

That's strange in itself, since Radical Feminism is not Marxist: Marxist Feminism doesn't believe in a "Patriarchy" that benefits men. It used to be a current, but it's all but lost now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/21 01:06 AM
5

Steven J. Svoboda has written around the issues with circumcision. Your husband is "right" that it's a male issue, but he's of course wrong to want to do it to your son. Try to make him agree to at least read a few books and articles against it, and talk about it again later.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 12:57 AM
8

These guys have gone the other way, leaned too much to the right under both the pressure of "Left"-wing political correctness and their eagerness to appease a rightoid audience. Also, they are Blue Pilled when it comes to women, they barely criticize feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/21 12:45 AM
-5

You're only supposed to be in a marriage if you've been made a sucker.
/r/MarriedRedPill19/07/21 07:40 PM
3

Women don't think that way.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/21 03:23 PM
41

You seem to ascribe manly agency to women. Women depend on others. When men go out of the picture, they suck the blood out of their own children.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/21 06:36 AM
5

A book I enjoyed was Smart and Sexy: the evolutionary origins and biological underpinnings of cognitive differences between the sexes. The author is proficient in Neuroscience, and the first half of the book is a very informative discussion of biological male-female differences. He gives the PDF version free. The second half of the book is neoreactionary, so you can skip that. It's a pity that political correctness prohibits all and any progressives from writing such an review.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/21 05:04 PM
2

Women are not mindless slaves to some genetic “female nature” that makes them robotically extract resources from men. Of course not. They are much more elaborate than that. Sure, one could argue that there are social factors at play causing that kind of behavior, No, that's not what one argues. but it isn’t because they have XX chromosomes. That's what one argues. We hate it when feminists stereotype all men, Of course. Because they have the wrong stereotype of an incel rapist. We wouldn't hate …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/21 08:50 AM
9

For every movement of dissent, there are attempts to co-opt them into the mainstream. That's what has happened to the Left, with the influx of all its middle-class leaders, that's what's happening with these groups you mention in the MRM. Luckily, it is (still) the age of the internet, which allows us to keep discussing and crack a thousands-years-old gynocentrism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/21 05:26 AM
8

Don't fall for the "Let's explore why you ask that". At the beginning they are supposed to establish a honest framework of collaboration.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/21 04:46 PM
6

Lol at Astrology! I'm a Libra and we Libras are rationalists, we don't believe in this shit.
/r/MGTOW14/07/21 12:12 PM
1

Christina Hoff Sommers I value her contributions against Radical Feminism as much as anyone, but the bottom line of her arguments is indeed "This is bad for women". Lol at MRA's "taking it too far"!!! These Traditio-Feminists think they're really so clever! Trying to keep the best of both worlds...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/21 11:57 AM
1

the shit he has said about rape against women especially Such as? I'm not aware of anything problematic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/21 11:02 AM
2

Yeah, that's the price you've got to pay if you are paranoid. A 20% chance of getting killed by a serial killer. It affords you a 80% chance to live a normal-ish life, though.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/21 04:57 AM
9

Therapists' code of ethics obligates them to disclose their philosophy around moral issues to a perspective client. Ask them directly about their views on gender issues, drop those that avoid to answer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/21 03:08 AM
6

Having kids while not living a full, happy life beforehand, is child abuse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/21 09:25 PM
34

It's been like that for a few thousand years, man.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 06:49 PM
5

It has proven that peace in the gender war is impossible, and the only way out is if men win. I'll give them that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/21 11:51 AM
2

something violated by the issues stated above Get off Feminist subs. There is no "violation" in prostitution. It's an exchange of money for services. Her body, her choice. Try rational thought, for a change.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 07:25 AM
2

Great resource, thanks. The Men's Right Movement angle, though, should be about, well, Men's Right to sex, which has been proven by science to be a basic human need, essential for a healthy and long life.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 04:33 AM
5

What if you're a leftist and you like kids and want kids of your own? This is my whole point. First, it doesn't worth it: you are expected to get less happy and live a shorter life. Second, if you nevertheless go ahead, even if you dodge the 60% chance of divorce and even if you are in the lucky ~5% of marriages that are happy, be informed that you'll have to take on a "traditional" role, i.e. take up much more of the responsibilities in the family. Gender dynamics and the Law system will push t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/21 02:41 PM
1

This was a profound realization that I had after reading Rollo Tomassi's third book, Positive Masculinity: there is really no other option if you find yourself waking up to the reality of gender relations after getting married, than going the "traditional" way. I put it like that because, for a Leftist, once you realize the true gender dynamics, there is absolutely no reason to get married and have kids. (Right-wingers need kids because of role and identity issues.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/21 02:22 PM
3

Legalization of prostitution should be the number 1 priority of the Men's Rights Movement.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 10:29 AM
3

First, "Beta" is a female term. Women are repulsed by "Betas", not men. I have "Beta" friends that are awesome guys. Second, being repulsed by prostitution is an instance of the maddona-whore complex. Sure, some prostitutes are gross. Others, though, are great. Third: I'm not all-in for make-or-break solutions for all men. Some start with serious handicaps, and their problem is how to hang on. If they can manage a reasonable degree of comfort rather than wither and die, I'm ok with that. I don't…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/21 06:53 AM
2

People in here understand that women are perfectly capable of farting, while the rest of the Left firmly believe they produce French perfume from their rectum.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/21 05:45 AM
2

Ah. Promising monogamy to a woman is, of course, wrong, but nobody told us. It's more difficult when you need to change things. In your case, you have yoked yourself to a woman's reproductive strategy, and now feel you need to reclaim your own, the male one. This is your business and yours only. No point in destroying your marriage by "being open and honest" in the process. My book might help.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/21 05:41 AM
10

The solution to your problem is this: you need to be so hot, that women want to be with you exclusively even if it means sharing you with other women. Now you just have to solve the problem how to be that hot.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/21 04:56 AM
2

Yes I'm serious. Self-improvement is great, but if the greatest "self-improvement" is internal, having even "technical" abundance helps. The idea would be first to hit the brothel, then go out at the bar to literally just have fun. A close friend used to frequent houses. Did wonders for his self-esteem. Kept him from marrying the first average post-wall slut, raised his standards. Did it make him happy, or "Alpha"? No. But it kept him sane. All women siphon off our resources, anyway.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/21 09:16 PM
25

You seem to have too high anxiety and it interferes with your assessment of situations. Take it easy on this. Also, you don't want to talk about their inherent misandrism with female friends. This runs too deep, deeper than any friendship, and it's not your job to change it. Get male friends if you want to talk about these issues. You need to keep things to yourself with female friends.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 07:33 PM
6

taking up class issues would mostly go against their own financial interests This. Since there's a clear tendency in females for mating with higher-class men, countering female freedoms goes against the petit-bourgeois' sexual interests too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 06:04 PM
3

The whole of the Left has been misguided. The whole of the Right too. It's a historic moment we are living, of a mass disillusionment, and we are just at the beginning.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 12:22 PM
2

Precisely! That's exactly what I've been doing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 08:35 AM
5

Yes, that was one of the most interesting discussions. Men fantasize about getting a woman to orgasm. Women fantasize about themselves orgasming. Rollo Tomassi calls it "female solipsism", the tendency to view themselves as the center of everything. This is expressed in sexuallity too. Evolutionary it makes sense, since nature installed mechanisms in women to protect humanity's most precious resource (at the time of evolutionary adaptedness), its reproductive means - i.e. themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 03:48 AM
1

Agreed. He does identify that the alternative would be to impose an equality status quo, but his political viewpoint doesn't allow him to explore that option.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/21 08:43 PM
2

THIS GODDAMIT! This is exactly what is going... Oh... Wait... Oh... ahhh... Nevermind.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 10:17 AM
10

The way to compare different things is to use common, meaningful criteria. The pro-female bias ultimately leads to differences in Life Expectancy and Happiness (subjective reports of Happiness are found to be very reliable). By those measures, there's no doubt that women's wellbeing is considered more important than men's.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/21 06:42 PM
0

we don't really know if or to what degree this bias towards women is evolutionary I'm afraid the evidence is overwhelming. Yes, it has dire consequences, because it means we have to engage into heavy social engineering enforcing equality against our nature. You can think of that (if it ever happens) as a triumph of the human intellect, itself a product of nature, over the crudest products of evolution. Most probably we won't make it, most human beings are going to live unhappy lives and humanity…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/21 05:48 PM
22

First and foremost recognize that men (and, even more, women) have an innate emotional bias in favor of women. It's effortful and thus tiresome, but everytime you think of something good about women you have to check yourself consciously: is what I'm thinking rational and justified, or is it just biased evolution speaking through my mouth?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/21 07:25 AM
14

According to Albert Einstein, women were more privileged than men in the US even back in 1921: https://www.nytimes.com/1921/07/08/archives/einstein-declares-women-rule-here-scientist-says-he-found-american.html
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/21 04:53 AM
3

You could practice, as long as you are certain you don't care about results. No point training yourself to failure.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/21 03:33 AM
1

Most people have such a fragile Ego, that in order to protect it they will miss the solution to their problems even if it hits them in their face.
/r/MGTOW07/07/21 02:48 AM
1

I'll do whatever the fuck I want, thank you.
/r/MGTOW07/07/21 02:47 AM
-9

The responsibility is on YOU to define a purpose, a meaning, something to fill the blank canvas you've been presented with. Yeah... No. Not really. It doesn't work, at least not for all people - some have very limited capacity to self-deceit. When living in an oppressed society, what gives meaning to life is either having power (usually, but not always, this means being at the side of the oppressors) or struggling against the oppression.
/r/MGTOW06/07/21 12:21 PM
1

It's a deeply humanitarian book, but, granted, it's not for everyone, you've got to have quite some exposure in how women work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/21 07:12 AM
6

Use prostitutes.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/21 04:07 AM
23

Farrell, for example, doesn't blame feminism. You have to take into account that was some decades ago. We can't really close our eyes to what Feminism has become today. That's why I include "The Manipulated Man": Esther Vilar, being a woman herself, had seen the insidious nature of Feminism even back in the 70s.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/21 04:06 AM
12

Together with The Manipulated Man, these three books are the fundamentals of the Manosphere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/21 09:51 PM
4

For anyone believing that men are not evil, and are human beings with a basic goodness which gets challenged and diverted by systemic oppression, it's not about fighting Feminism as about developing a liberating perspective focused on men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/21 01:04 PM
1

Only children have parents. Adults have other adults to which they relate or not. When he relays a message to me from a friend, my mother, or relative Delete that recording that you have. Stop harboring that longing. When people try to relay messages refuse to hear them, tell them to stop doing that.
/r/MGTOW04/07/21 12:40 PM
5

What is going through a major life reorganization? E.g. divorce, change city, enter university... And if you have such a disorder, what can you do about it? It's exhausting because you can't rely on your intuition: your lizard brain is messed up. Most people with personality disorders just go through to become that weird lonely old man or a cat lady. What you can count on to compensate is 1) high IQ, 2) a good life-long psychologist, 3) relatives. So for example if you are paranoid, it pays to b…
/r/TheRedPill04/07/21 09:17 AM
2

These two can happen out of another problem, e.g. depression. I'm pointing to the case where one "doesn't have a problem", but has no friends and cares for nothing except ones self.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/21 05:25 AM
3

An insidious mental health problem is personality disorder: by definition, you can't understand you have it. Two are the most worrying indicators for having a personality disorder: You don't have any friends (except if you are going through a major life reorganization) You have no "social interest" (identity ideologies like nationalism don't count as social interest).
/r/TheRedPill04/07/21 03:56 AM
2

"Group selection theory" is indeed discredited. But this is a specific theory, that proposes specific mechanisms - that's what's discredited. Evolution at the level of the group, however, is making a (rather spectacular) come back in the latest years. The route by which this happens is different. Summarizing: males compete, females choose. Groups in which male competition is more pro-social out-perform and thus get selected by evolution. If prodigious waste is an indication of fitness by an indi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/21 09:57 AM
-4

Capitalists in reality suffer under capitalism. They may be rich, able to do whatever they want, have scores of golddiggers chasing them and offering free sex, but they don't have a good life overall because human relations are ruined. We should convince them to give away all their wealth and institute a socialist society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/21 07:38 AM
1

Just to be clear, you need several thousands of years to change evolutionary preferences. Rational thought and discourse, sadly, has very little power regarding behavioral change. In these cases, only constant exercise of power can change things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/21 07:04 AM
6

I see them as two separate problems: The personal, where a man has to get his sexual needs met (the emotional needs too, but I see the sexual ones as more pressing). And the sociopolitical, where things are bad for men as a whole, and change is needed. Probably that's where the misunderstanding that you point at comes from. At the personal level, things are simple: since there is a total female domination of the sexual marketplace, specifically and consciously backed by the capitalist state, the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/21 03:06 PM
7

To be clear: I'm not justifying the situation. I'm explaining it. It's actually so bad that for most men just paying would be easier. But, of course, in authoritarian countries prostitution is illegal. That's the whole point: men's basic needs are repressed and all exits blocked, so that playing the rat game is your only option.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/21 02:30 PM
-9

there isn’t any inherent reason it has to be that way Of course there is. Since you don't realize it, it is expected that you end up not a guy who has had a successful record with women (to put it mildly) No offence here, but let me try to explain: it's basic evopsych, in almost all species, that males court females choose. Since females are offering the reproductive capacity, males must exhibit "prodigious waste" (as evolutionary psychologist Geoffrey Miller puts it), in order to display abunda…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/21 01:08 PM
2

She wants the marriagedivorce. She is only aware of the first half. After the deed is done and the kids and resources secured, she phaseshifts and enters the divorce phase. What's the part you don't understand?
/r/MGTOW27/06/21 05:01 AM
3

What if women don't love even their own children?
/r/MensRights25/06/21 01:41 PM
15

It's masculine gay men that are hard-pressed to exist. They are livid against the expectation to conform to "Gay-Pride" standards of homosexuality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/21 06:04 AM
0

Anthropologist Helen Fisher said "We weren't made to be happy, we were made to reproduce". In her mind she was talking about humans, but in her deepest soul, unconsciously, she was talking about women. Tradcons are stupid, but they got one thing right: woman is at her happiest when she has submitted to a man she considers way above herself. (Not that I personally believe that most women are good enough for that.) I strongly believe that the way to make women happy is to focus exclusively on maki…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/21 03:55 AM
1

Instincts were programmed for the Paleolithic. It's not adaptive any longer to follow them, neither for women (e.g. Alpha widows) nor for men (e.g. divorce raped). The reason for today's Go Girl mania is that satisfying women's instincts is compatible with capitalism (consumerism, reproduction, women's sexual preference for the rich "prince"), while satisfying men's instincts (i.e. uninhibited access to female sexuality) would make them stop working in these soul-crushing jobs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/21 06:05 PM
1

No, it Yoda is.
/r/askTRP22/06/21 11:22 AM
19

It seems to me that the idea of a high-status man has gone from a sophisticated and gold-hearted gentleman who arouses more cerebral desires to a more thug-like man who appeals to more primitive and superficial definitions of masculinity: physical strength, raw social dominance, etc. Well... yes. The world is indeed gynocentrist now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/21 09:56 AM
0

It's not your children's, though, getting got by you...
/r/askTRP22/06/21 09:43 AM
3

Then you've got to learn to love yourself. This you don't do alone, but by cultivating friendships with good men. "Unconditional" love, when talking about adults, is a problem term, and too pedestalized. What you need is people who can appreciate your best qualities, so much so that they are prepared to overlook your lesser ones. That's about the definition of good friends. It goes a bit contrary to TRP's focus on building power, since with friends you are not supposed to keep your weak side in …
/r/askTRP22/06/21 03:33 AM
3

This is some seriously flawed logic you got there. It's not the mom. It's the dad that can love you unconditionally, so much so that he"ll make himself obsolete and make you independent. Mom, by herself, will keep you her perpetual emotional slave.
/r/askTRP22/06/21 02:44 AM
52

in denial That's how this situation has managed to survive for millenia: the fact that women will betray their own sons in favor of their gender, is something near-impossible to grasp.
/r/askTRP21/06/21 03:35 PM
28

I guess every thread needs a loser answer. Hypergamy doesn't care about the kids. He'd just be fucked now, separated with kids in another country.
/r/askTRP21/06/21 06:20 AM
140

Good game. You've had your time while it was your turn, took the good years, escaped just before she hits The Wall. You mostly winged it, but still. No kids. Kudos.
/r/askTRP21/06/21 01:53 AM
3

Coupled with the horrible legal system in the US, it takes away all dread. There is incentive to be lazy and divorce-rape you. Also, makes the house the only place where woman can get the drama she needs. She doesn't feel gratitude, she feels bored and imprisoned.
/r/askTRP20/06/21 07:53 PM
1

he will mourn when the plates all break and time has made him old and ugly That's not him. It might be you. Don't project. The game is about learning how to get women when you want them, not about trying to keep one locked.
/r/askTRP20/06/21 01:21 PM
1

You did great.
/r/askTRP20/06/21 01:19 PM
1

He might be saying that you'd better just kept her as a plate so that you could keep fucking her plus the other girls. But that's a move even very pro players are not guaranteed to succeed at. Or he might just be an idiot.
/r/askTRP20/06/21 12:58 PM
7

Don't make ideological discussion where you have sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/21 09:27 AM
27

I'll try to answer a big part of that: Many many thousands of years ago, at the evolutionary era of the human species, the mating system was quite different. Humans lived in small foraging bands, consisting mostly of relatives: mothers, children, cousins, uncles, second aunts etc. Women are the ones who got pregnant, and since there was no marriage, they had to be the sole custodians, with the support of the band, of course. Now since the band was mostly relatives, in-band sex was... incestuous!…
/r/askTRP20/06/21 09:00 AM
1

I can’t believe that women were duped into believing that men had it better though. Well the cheese seemed to worth it. They were promised sexual freedom, and they sure got it. Did that make them happy? No. Why? It's the old Fisherman and his Wife Grimm Tale.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/21 05:33 PM
12

This is fantastic work, man. Thanks!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/21 04:35 PM
5

Anger is attractive when you control it, unattractive when it controls you.
/r/askTRP19/06/21 09:05 AM
3

/u/edjohn88 gets it right.
/r/askTRP19/06/21 09:00 AM
3

Pay. Take lessons. It's worth it.
/r/askTRP18/06/21 08:53 PM
1

I promise you - if you really start loving her and connecting with her emotionally - she will want to have sex with you again. Didn't The Lord say not to make false promises?
/r/askTRP18/06/21 07:25 AM
2

I didn't read that article, but I don't agree if that's the reasoning. The reason to cheat is that marriage is so much against the male sexual strategy that is practically rape for them - if we define rape as an act against your reproductive strategy.
/r/askTRP18/06/21 05:20 AM
1

... on the other hand, now that your wife is practically just a random broad, you could use her to hone your skills. Read "How to save a Low Sex Marriage", it's the plan.
/r/askTRP18/06/21 04:14 AM
3

When dealing with ruthless people, you have to act ruthless yourself, even if it's not who you are. The idea is to take the good years from a relationship, and skip the bad ones, the cost. You probably could improve your marriage, but it would take so much effort that would give you a fantastic sex life if spent in new prospects, rather than trying to save the sunken cost. As you say, you are lucky you don't have kids. I'd only recommend trying to save your marriage for the sake of kids.
/r/askTRP18/06/21 04:09 AM
3

Alas, not all of us are that young...
/r/askTRP17/06/21 08:10 PM
18

Couples therapy? Seriously? So that he can "explore.the ways he is making his wife unhappy?"
/r/askTRP17/06/21 08:01 PM
11

'49. You are still young. No kids. Sex was never good. This is a clear divorce. Don't do the same mistake and remarry. Pull a "Stalinist": five year plans, then next.
/r/askTRP17/06/21 07:39 PM
1

Anyone having a rudimentary understanding of evolutionary biology can understand this. It the basic biological difference in gametes, from which the sexes get differentiated. I'm trying to talk about the scientific perspective, you are doing moral policing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/21 03:38 PM
2

Yes and can you manage to explain which is the sexist part?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/21 03:29 PM
2

Yup, agreed. As all things about Stoicism, helps with bearing a life full of controversies. It lacks the (radical) Left's liberating vision, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/21 06:15 AM
2

Human connection nowadays can only be fulfilled by male buddies.
/r/askTRP17/06/21 03:43 AM
1

If you get really pressed, just say "If I'm very much in love..." This should at least boost the BJs for a while.
/r/askTRP16/06/21 09:40 PM
1

You got some good advice in here. One that's not mentioned yet is a mission. Some people just lack a mission to energize them. Something meaningful to you. If you have a higher mission, all other things that now seem trivial, well, they can still look trivial comperative to your mission, but they are now put in a context, and get a new meaning.
/r/askTRP16/06/21 09:35 PM
25

Agreed. It's becoming ever more clear that the elite are moving away from the middle class (the "petite bourgeoisie) as their ally for stability, and putting their money in women - now that most work is easy, safe, office work and they can count on them to do it.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 10:03 AM
12

"Hookup? No way! I don't know you enough."
/r/askTRP16/06/21 07:14 AM
2

I guess that made sense back when women couldn't study/work No it didn't. It was absurd even back then. Neotraditionalism is the resurrection of stupidity. Desperation for female affection disguised as masculine affluence. Bullshit. The one positive thing of the new era is the chance to spin plates all along into your 50s. That's they way to go. (And there are several options when you get to 50 too).
/r/askTRP16/06/21 07:11 AM
0

I don't discuss with fascists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/21 05:50 PM
67

This goddamit. There's a reason we say spin plates.
/r/askTRP14/06/21 03:46 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rg_RimfKTfo
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/21 07:20 AM
10

If you are doing objectively good, your problem might be distorted thinking - for whatever reason. Get a psychology book that lists the types, e.g. Burns' Feeling Great, and read about them, might help you gain some distance and perspective.
/r/askTRP13/06/21 05:03 PM
4

Cut him off completely. He's dead. Start evaluating yourself objectively. Keep a diary: how did you improve today? Excel in something: helps to build up confidence. What's your strong point? Therapy might help. Getting a group of close friends is guaranteed to help, if you can do it.
/r/askTRP13/06/21 12:31 PM
7

"Don't spend your sperm in vain. It's a sin. You need to ejaculate into a woman, create children, so they can be a workforce and be taxed."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/21 09:16 PM
2

Yeah, the world would be buch better if bore leaders were febale, and politics used a febale language... (I've a cold and by nose is blocked).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/21 06:16 PM
1

As long as you didn't consider Nazism to be masculine before reading my comment, that's fair. I'm saying that because it happens so that people consider it extraordinary to call Nazism feminine, all the while not considering it extraordinary to believe it is masculine. (Double standard, gynocentrism, you know the drill).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/21 04:27 PM
9

Eh, I'll not give a hasty answer about all of it now, but you seem to be making some inferences I'd like to correct. Rigid gender roles You seem to suggest that Rigid Gender Roles is something inherently masculine. It isn't. E.g. during wars, women very much prefer "rigid gender roles". Scores of them have found meaning in the life of a housewife, however much feminists try to deny it. On the other hand, scores of men have found misery in their gender's role of a provider, but were too disorient…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/21 02:42 PM
-2

Working on it, I would have something in a couple of months. Meanwhile you can google and read about The Dark Side of Oxytocin.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/21 02:08 PM
6

All men are masculine because they are men. While I understand the sentiment from which this proposition stems, and probably agree (with the sentiment), that formulation is not useful, in my opinion. We don't have to rediscover the wheel. From Yung's time, even earlier, it was posited that there are male and female parts in both men and women. The current narrative about "toxic" masculinity basically ascribes toxicity to all that is men-related, and I don't think there's any point in taking it a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/21 10:49 AM
3

"No ONS" is a sign to ward off Low Value Males™. What woman would turn down Leonardo di Caprio for a ONS? It's the mediocre ones that want to partake, that are the annoying ones. Women "stop" being into ONSs when they click into Marriage Mode: it's a self-assurance device, "Meh, I'm over that phase", which helps build the mentality they need in order to secure a Long Term Provider, aka Husband. They generally fall back to the standard ONS mode ("I'm still young and desirable") after lifelong pro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/21 02:44 PM
4

The biggest mistake men, especially leftists, do in dating, is projection: that women feel the same way as they do. E.g that they are interested in intimacy rather than fun.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/21 05:51 AM
1

No, man, the guy in the video! They have the same name... :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/21 05:25 AM
2

your participation in trp and mgtow is... concerning Maybe not more than your lack of participation in all this (your profile says you're here only for a few days). Take some time to familiarize yourself with the landscape, and make judgements afterwards.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/21 04:59 AM
2

When Engels wrote that the gender division is a class division, he was right. He was wrong on women being the oppressed class, of course, but it is understandable: he was a capitalist himself, i.e. not oppressed himself. He did the mistake most bourgeois do, follow his heart and give a gift to women, in this case his theory of them being oppressed by men I believe we can think of Feminism as a hypothesis for the Left, that has now been clearly proven wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/21 04:25 AM
8

It's what Moeller concludes too, that there are "curated" identities, from which individuals are to pick in order to construct their "unique" individuality. Once you see the game, it's such a grotesque reality: the Left's notion of the freely evolving person turned on its head...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/21 08:58 PM
1

Get some male buddies. Join a hockey team or something, start there. Social dancing would also be an idea, but there are women there. You first need to get your social muscles worked out.
/r/askTRP10/06/21 06:48 PM
1

Lol!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/21 05:43 PM
22

Wokism, the current culture that is the culmination and the breeding ground of modern Feminism, is the left wing of Neoliberalism, rather than any notion of a Left-wing culture. This video by Philosophy Prof Moeller is an amazingly acurate analysis of wokism, clearing out all the misconceptions around it, and all the (right-wing) attempts to conflate it with the Left. Useful also for Leftists who are confused and ambivalent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/21 01:00 PM
6

This 100%. Lol LTR of 3 months... You were just her plate all along. Radio silence, move on.
/r/askTRP09/06/21 10:12 AM
1

It's ok to cry. As long as you do it alone, or in the presence of a good buddy of yours. If you have no buddies, cry your heart out alone, why the fuck not? Not in front of women or acquaintances, though. Now as people in here say, get help, obviously. Loneliness is cured with buddies. If you have none, start with going out to environments that allow for "artificial" socializing. E.g. a bowling group or something. Even replacing one night drinking inside with a night of a nerdy table games group…
/r/askTRP09/06/21 08:40 AM
12

Let me put it this way: have you seen The Red Pill documentary? It takes a generally open minded feminist one year of full personal engagement, dedicating all her mental energy, in order to come over. It's not that we haven't tried discussion with feminists, for quite many years.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/21 07:46 AM
15

It's a political issue. And as with all political issues, change requires application of power, i.e. force, rather than discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/21 07:03 AM
9

Netflix is a shitshow. Literally all its American productions are built trying to push gynocentrism down our throats. Even its children shows, ffs. Men should boycott it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/21 05:29 AM
5

Hitler did fail his painting exams and go nuts, though...
/r/askTRP08/06/21 08:33 PM
2

The go to book against depression that CBT councelors suggest is Dr D. Burn's Feeling Good. Serious stuff, give it a read.
/r/askTRP08/06/21 01:18 AM
1

This.
/r/askTRP08/06/21 01:12 AM
0

As if fucking up our romantic relationships wasn't enough already...
/r/MGTOW07/06/21 01:13 PM
5

1) increase your value. Nobody wants friends with a low value male. Body and health, cleanness, read books but don't try to be clever about it. Go Monk mode for at least 6 months if you find yourself starting very low. 2) You should have kept at least some of your childhood friends, if they were any good. Life can separate you, though, so it's understandable if not. 3) Learn to honestly appreciate good qualities in others. People appreciate that. 4) Don't be a taker. Be a giver on qualities you …
/r/askTRP06/06/21 10:38 AM
27

It's almost like feminists actually hate men rather than an abstract "Patriarchy".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/21 02:22 AM
3

Dude the way you formulate your question invalidates your results. Gives more incentive to left-wingers to vote. I'd say scrap it, and do it again in a month or so, properly.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 01:38 AM
4

Stop it, you are killing me
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/21 06:07 PM
1

I'd say tt's actually a major difference, and not simply linguistic. Many people, especially conservatives, consider there is a drive to reproduce, rather than have sex, justifying their usual utilization of their children as an existential angst escape into the (expected) familiarity and predictability of familial life. Especially for men, actual reproduction can take many forms, e.g. lookup partible paternity, and is much more socially determined than in women - while their sex drive is much m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/21 03:08 PM
5

"Biology", in our context refering specifically to evolution, doesn't "exist" or "operate" at the individual level. It works on the large scale. Human individuals, in their limited life-time scale, operate largely on instincts and drives. My example is this: Imagine getting an offer of ejaculating in a tube, and having 10.000 offspring through artificial insemination of that many women. The price would be your head. Would you take it? Evolutionary, it makes sense. Psychologically, not at all. Lo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/21 11:21 AM
1

You have no objective problems. That's relatively easy. Chill, take your time, shave your head, you'll be fine.
/r/askTRP05/06/21 08:02 AM
2

The best answer would be in my book. Let me try to summarize it, lest I be accused of doing cheap promo without providing value: A man is a male human. So, a man is a male. And a man is a human. As a male, he has distinct sexual characteristics and behaviors, tuned towards optimizing reproduction at the era those evolutions took place. This has shaped his unconscious drives and psychology. As is the case in Nature, there are statistical deviations around the standard male settings, so you can ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/21 07:47 AM
2

I know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/21 07:29 AM
9

Well it does look puzzling. From the looks of it, it seems he tries to initiate a serious discussion by quoting a redical feminist as a basis. That's my wild guess, at least,. Let me know if you have any other insights on this strange incident.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/21 07:24 AM
1

Don't let the one testicle thing keep you back. It most probably won't matter to girls. But if it keeps you worried, just tell your dad and arrange a plastic surgery, it should be routine.
/r/askTRP04/06/21 05:52 PM
1

No male buddies in the picture?
/r/askTRP04/06/21 03:38 PM
3

Exactly this.
/r/askTRP04/06/21 06:13 AM
1

That's not very Long, mind you. You need at least two years to be able to claim that you know her.
/r/askTRP02/06/21 10:39 PM
1

Women like to have male friends. Male friends are dependable, and can do something sacrificial for you when you get in need.
/r/askTRP02/06/21 09:59 PM
6

OK this is both very easy and very difficult. Do you have kids? If no, it's easy. If yes, it's difficult. Marriage gives too much power to the woman, especially in the US. It's quite evident that she cannot use it to a good end. Take into account that if you get kids, things will be much much more difficult. It's only your job to manage her for the sake of your kids, nothing else.is worth it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/21 09:53 PM
1

Sure, lol! 😂😂😂
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/21 05:44 PM
4

Warren Farrell had a shocking insight in The Myth Of Male Power: that there is a spike in male suicides around the age that their gender's role is starting to get clear.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/21 09:05 AM
3

You read Feeling Good by D. Burns? He is now focusing on his TEAM-CBT treatement, claims it's extremely efficient.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/21 09:04 AM
1

Please try and get this on main stream non MRA forums and reddits You try. We'll be waiting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/21 09:00 AM
5

I'm in the process of researching that too, maybe we can cooperate. I've come to conclude that Feminism has too many parallels with Nazism, and is actually a "slow" Nazism. The female sex has, in Feminism, the same place that nation has in Nazism. I myself would consider that too far fetched a few years back, but I think we can no longer discount the mounting evidence. The book I'm reading is The Anatomy Of Fascism, and the analogies are pretty clear. E.g.: "Objection: there are also men in the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/21 06:08 AM
1

There are two systems of female primacy: Traditionalism (women don't work and taken care of) and Feminism (women can choose to work, get to bed men more attractive than them for longer). Conservatism calls for a return to the first.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/21 06:00 AM
1

The idea is to aim for limbic attraction and avoid falling into the negotiated attraction trap.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/21 01:29 AM
1

If you have the will and energy, you can try to include him in your social circle. He needs to get a life, apparently. Right now that thot seems to be his only emotional outlet.
/r/askTRP01/06/21 05:45 AM
4

Try to imagine being content sexually, having all the money you need, and having just come from a long long vacation. What do you like doing?
/r/askTRP31/05/21 07:04 PM
4

Giving people infinite freedom reveals their true nature. Underneath, it was always like that, but now it is expressed freely, not only passive-aggressively.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/21 05:16 AM
3

Having two girls solves that problem.
/r/askTRP29/05/21 08:12 PM
1

I'm in the process of the research, hope I'll have an article in a couple of months. Briefly, 1) they are both based on emotions rather than arguments, 2) they are both oxytocin-fuelled, "us-vs-them", dehumanizing "thems", 3) mobilizing masses in order to overrun the public place (streets for historical fascism, institutions and the internet for feminism) 4) there are no possibilities for debating There are many more parallels, (e.g. their ultimate subservience to capitalist power), but these fo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/21 10:29 AM
3

"Therapy" is not the only way people cope with grief. It wasn't even a way a few years ago. Community support, if available, is better. He seems to have an intimate circle of friends, so I'd say that's the support he needs.
/r/askTRP28/05/21 07:17 AM
2

Sometime we should specifically discuss the fact that Feminism is Nazism. It is not like Nazism, or analogous to Nazism. It is Nazism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/21 04:10 AM
3

This. Legalizing prostitution should be the number one priority of the Men's Movement in the US. It would take care of scores of problems. E.g. it has been shown that legalized prostitution reduces dramatically the rate of rapes, which is rediculously high in the US. Heck, if Feminists truly cared about reducing rape more than consolidating power for themselves, they should have prioritized the legalization of prostitution themselves. That's not to say that incels are predominantly driven to rap…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/21 04:06 AM
5

I hate existentialism, but one of its maxims really helps here: Whatever you do, you will regret it. Should I ditch this girl, or should I keep trying to fix things? If you ditch her, you will regret it. If you try to fix things you will regret it. And so on, for everything. Choices are hard because once you make one, you lose options. It helps to know that you never lose 100%. It's an option because it has some pros. It has some cons too. If you feel it's 60-40, go with the 60. If it was the ot…
/r/askTRP27/05/21 08:51 PM
2

https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/nk5rov/depression_in_men_the_sexist_mental_health_system/gzesbtf/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 03:36 PM
4

Also... I feel I should mention this: Did you see the reply at my other comment by the non-binary guy who used an escort? Where he describes getting the chance to feel hugged and accepted for the first time in his life? You can only bring out these kind of experiences of men if you de-shameify the discourse. And you do that by intentionally speaking about sex and its various aspects. It's a political decision.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 03:03 PM
1

Lol! I know what you're talking about. It would take me four times the time, space and effort to be tactical, though. And 1) I'm not getting paid for it, and 2) that way I leave something for all you guys to take up! I'm conscious that my conclusions are vanguard thinking packaged in casual language. Which is kind of a pity, because I'm just saying that The Empress is Naked. It's a bit too taxing for me to account for the sensibilities of every single reader, so I appreciate immensely the work t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 01:43 PM
3

You'll end up like a dog hunting his tail. There is only one way out of this circular reasoning, and that's identifying that the single most important difference between the sexes is sex. In politics they say "follow the money". I say "follow the fucks". See the fucks distribution, see how it evolved once women were given absolute freedom, see what's going on on hookup apps, and you have your answer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/21 11:55 AM
3

I'm not sure your point is clear.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/21 08:41 AM
11

Men are being oppressed at the very bottom of their (Maslow's) hierarchy of needs: sex. No one is allowed to even talk about it, of course, because this would mean more "emotional work" by women. Most men are so desperate that they spend their lives trying to fuck their own wives, ffs. I remember that story for the guy that decided to kill himself. "Since I'll be at it, it doesn't hurt to go over to Mexico for drugs and hookers." He goes, decides that life is not so bad after all. (I'd recommend…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/21 07:57 AM
13

No they don't. It's 2021. Women are strong, independed and intelligent. If they complain all day long for problems, it's because these problems actually exist, because Patriarchy. It's not that they are hysterical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/21 07:52 AM
1

Nothing very deep, actually. You can, for example, be ousted from a University or sacked from a job just for approaching a woman, or thrown into prison as a rapist if your own wife decides that you "raped" her after having sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/21 01:07 AM
10

Take care of yourself and work towards raising your Sexual Market Value so that your intimacy needs get taken care of. You came here a few years late (as most of us do), so you've wasted a lot of your potential by commiting to a woman and her children. Incidentally, they are your children too, and if you care about them you should, again, take care of their father, i.e. yourself. Push through the initial despair phase: It does get better with time. There is a lot of info in TRP, that can help yo…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/21 08:32 PM
28

I was wondering, what more can we do to combat this notion? Fuck them, ignore them (if French is allowed per sub rules). There's no way you can discuss with the mainstream view on gender issues. They are essentially fascist, as MenKampf clearly illustrates.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/21 09:37 AM
3

Nice insight, kudos.
/r/MGTOW23/05/21 10:04 PM
3

I'm not sure you can call this "internalized misandry". It is plain repression. As a man you are subjected to constant violence, and you have your sexual and intimacy needs outlawed. Anger and violence are evolved reactions to repression, which society channels into more "productive" outlets, e.g. overworking yourself to death, in the hope that you'll get rewarded. Once you see the whole picture, though, despair seems natural. The way out of this circle is to acknowledge your feelings, adjust yo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/21 02:45 PM
12

So why not do it that way? I dunno man... People might get the wrong idea, you know? That class has something to do with economics and power and stuff. Now we wouldn't want to turn them all to communists, would we?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/21 06:29 AM
6

This. You apparently haven't experienced the spectacular flip women do when they have secured your commitment...
/r/askTRP21/05/21 09:02 AM
4

A child taking care of his parent is abuse. You have sacrificed yourself for your mother, not the other way around. A healthy child (and man) grows with a sense of security and trust. You never had that. Even if your mother did everything she could, it wasn't enough. And, seeing how things turned out, I very much doubt that she couldn't do better. Is an unhappy surgeon really better off than a happy gardener? Maybe only "on paper", as you write. Ripper's commentation of a mission is correct, of …
/r/askTRP21/05/21 07:33 AM
8

I don't think you need to work more. On the contrary. You got accustomed to chase achievement over the top, and forgot how to relax and enjoy the present. I would prescribe obligatory two nights out for beers with 3-4 of your buddies per week.
/r/askTRP20/05/21 11:01 AM
12

"Fuckboy" is womanese for "High Sexual Market Value Man That Won't Commit to Me (the bastard), But I Don't Care Because I'm a Strong Independent Woman"
/r/askTRP19/05/21 04:21 PM
6

Dominance in men is a trait attractive to women. This makes them select men that might be too dominent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/21 04:39 AM
1

have a ton of close friends Start there. You don't really need "a ton" of close friends, 2-3 would do. You lack belonging, connectedness. Also, be more conscious in building your own thing where you have (soft) power. That might have to do with massage, e.g. a massage practice group where you are the guru or something. You find what works for you.
/r/askTRP17/05/21 08:47 AM
1

Well I could provide plenty of evidence, but whether it would constitute proof for everyone is another matter. It is an idea about evolution as a natural processes, of course, not an insult towards a gender, as in "they are underdeveloped". Women being the bottleneck in reproduction, and reproduction having such a huge, obvious, importance for the species, led to nature setting up biases in both men's and women's basic psychology to uphold this importance. So "love" for men is sacrificial love, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/21 03:52 AM
3

Regarding sexual behavior there's that "paradox" where male homosexuals are exhibit the male sexual strategy even more than heterosexuals. Ditto for lesbians. So men prefer youth, have a higher sex drive, females have a dual mating strategy, these kinds of things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/21 06:20 PM
1

Oops yes, thanks. Editing it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/21 04:47 PM
8

A rule of thumb that I've seen discussed and feels correct, although I haven't seen any scientific treatment on it, is the 60-20-20 rule. 60% of women are typically feminine, 20% in-the-middle, and 20% have more male traits than female. 60% of men typically masculine mindset, 20% an equal mix, 20% typically feminine. I would exempt sexual behavior from this rule, where things are much more polarized. Also, it doesn't account for allegiances: women are predominantly with the woman-party, and men …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/21 03:41 PM
3

Sounds a lot like Esther Vilar. Thanks! I think she's one of the bravest humans to walk the earth, and one of the greatest Marxists. No doubt women do love their children (you don't mention that) It's a big issue, didn't want to touch it. What men and women find attractive: again, I think you got that. Indeed, being nice is something that men appreciate in women, not the other way around. Later thought: caring for the bearer and nurturer of one's offspring may bring evolutionary advances, while …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/21 01:43 PM
0

Ah, the distribution... The million dollar question. It's very complex, so the way to answer it, especially if you view it from a political viewpoint (as opposed, eg re disease susceptibility) is prioritize the most important. After several decades of involvement with gender issues, I've come to the conclusion that the single most important biological difference is that women feel aversion, rather than attraction, when needing to care for a man. Love, as in what people perceive as caring for som…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/21 11:18 AM
1

This is an interesting one. Evolutionary, "pair bonding", i.e. the "in love" feeling, was programmed to last only one or two years, enough to impregnate her and provide a bit. It was never meant to be for 18 years, let alone a lifetime. Being anxious about "damaging your pair-bonding capacity" as a man shows that you are in provider, i.e. Beta mode: it's an ideological gift that you provide to the particular pussy, that you consider normal and even noble to be bonded, i.e. tied up, to her.
/r/askTRP14/05/21 10:17 PM
2

Marriage is stupid. All around the world. Especially since you have no need for kids, which is the healthiest stance a man can have imo. Stay single, keep raising your SMV, and you'll do fine with spinning plates and mini LTRs at least until your late 50s.
/r/askTRP14/05/21 10:50 AM
0

What can men do? I think you answered your own question: The only young people who escape this seem to be the traditionally good-looking, tall & attractive types. You can even hookup with the rich guys' wives, that way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/21 07:07 PM
1

Lol. I didn't draw conclusion from your username, I skimmed through your comments. Apologies if it offended you. Reminds me of Malcolm X's story about the house slave vs the field slave. The first would take up arms to defend their owner against the second.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/21 04:38 AM
1

You might remember the "moral outrage", especially in France, against Muslim women wearing their traditional garments, and the prohibitions, quite at odds with the supposed "liberal" standards. Now, when western women hide their faces, it's suddenly a good thing. It is almost as if liberal Feminism has no principles, and can support any position that currently seems to benefit their narrative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/21 10:27 PM
6

For your next LTR, try to establish early in the relationship the frame that "I am not monogamous".
/r/askTRP11/05/21 08:09 PM
1

You seem to be confused. This is Left Wing Male Advocates. There are many other subs where you can advocate for your own sex's sexual strategy. For men, involvement even in the old-school PUA community "helps equip participants with a range of valued social and communication skills. This seemed to be especially beneficial for immigrant participants, who are overrepresented in the community." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7043806/ This is the first and last message from me, I'm not…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/21 04:25 AM
7

How do think that will end? Before an organism is driven to suicide of desperation, it first tries to destroy the system that drives it to desperation. See school shootings.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/21 07:52 AM
5

Kind of agreed. Alpha/Beta is supposed to be related to female attraction only. Generalization to other realms, especially friends, doesn't hold water.
/r/askTRP09/05/21 09:30 PM
5

There is a core similarity between neoliberalism and feminism. Neoliberalism is supposed tricke down money. Feminism is supposed tricke down sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/21 11:29 AM
8

Easiest way is to be inconsistent. If you are not naturally psychopathic, though, you might not enjoy it. It might be better to create dread. Flirt lightly with other girls in front of her, don't let her know where you are at all times etc Gives her feels and keeps her behaving.
/r/askTRP09/05/21 08:07 AM
2

There's a reason The Fisherman and his Wife fairytale exists.
/r/MGTOW09/05/21 01:44 AM
14

You don't have to treat friends as LTRs. With a true buddy you can do months to talk and then pick it up where you left it, no problem. If you have a different lifestyle it will most probably put a practical distance among you, but that doesn't need to be an emotional distance too. "Hard nexting" them makes no sense. Taking up all the burden, neither. Find a balance that you feel good with.
/r/askTRP08/05/21 07:46 AM
2

Tell me what you think of it.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 08:16 PM
2

Feeling good by David Burns is a self-help book that is used by psychiatrists to treat depression. Give it a read.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 06:46 PM
2

Yeah me too. It's a strange croud... Very low political perception.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 10:24 AM
-18

It's not an excuse. Educate yourself about personality disorders (Borderline PD). They don't get better, and there's nothing you can do except distancing yourself. Don't feel guilty, it's OK to stop loving your sister.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 02:22 AM
5

It used to be that the International Socialist Tendency opposed the idea of "Patriarchy" as oppresison of men over women. The 4th Internationals less so. But it used to be common ground in the radical Left that women are oppressed by the system, not by men, and that women's oppression did not benefit men. So, despite its name, Radical Feminism didn't have much to do with the Radical Left. RadFem is bourgoise feminism, and, yes, the mother of about all the versions we have circulating today. It h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/21 05:25 PM
2

400k is still small-ish. It'd have to be > 1.5 mil to qualitatively change were there is an endless stream of new prospective women.
/r/askTRP05/05/21 07:23 AM
7

The exact same approach can be cool or creepy depending singularly on the Sexual Market Value of the man. There is a Game going on, there are Rules to this game, and you should learn them and play by them. And oh, they are stacked against you. I personally am not too fond of the game, and would be up to abolish it. Till then, we have to live and have sex, though...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/21 09:24 PM
1

Women are happier and live longer. That's the criteria.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/21 08:47 PM
2

The trick is to consider the marriage over anyway, on the emotional level. Raise his SMV, get a life, DGAF. Then dread, yes, for the rest of her life. It sucks, but on the other hand she has now given him the moral permission to get a side chick.
/r/askTRP04/05/21 05:36 PM
2

He'll have to man up even if he leaves. It's better to man-up before, then. He can always leave later, if it doesn't work out.
/r/askTRP04/05/21 02:55 PM
2

He needs to take action and change. That's what we believe in here: that a man can take action and can change. It's only one year they've been having problems. This is not desperate, despite appearances.
/r/askTRP04/05/21 01:23 PM
2

Nope, I did read that his wife beat him. That's what The Red Pill is about: that it's a very shitty situation, and he has to Alpha up. If he was adequate as it is now, he wouldn't be searching for advice.
/r/askTRP04/05/21 01:20 PM
2

the woman in the relationship is often given control to furnish and design the house as they want I think there's something more than "archaic patriarchal standards" at work here. Imo, it's an animalistic ritual - and, of course, humans are animals. You can observe, for example, dogs, pissing around an area they want to secure as their own.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/21 07:22 AM
14

OK, so... We don't have the knowledge about your marriage, so we can't give you definite advice. It's your responsibility to evaluate the answers in here. Most of our user base are young and have not much experience in LTRs, let alone marriage and children. So read the replies critically. "If you are unhappy leave" is feminine bullshit. When reading your OP I scanned for the word "children". My position on "Should I divorce?" is: Yes if you don't have kids, No if you have kids. Unless you can ge…
/r/askTRP04/05/21 06:08 AM
1

There's that old issue in the Left, of Debating versus Power struggle. With regard to gender issues, the former has been tried extensively and proven ineffective.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/21 08:33 PM
2

If I may recommend my book on that, I examine your question at length. Briefly, there are Biological, Social, and Personal constituents in attraction. I'm not sure what you mean by "deterministic" attraction, but we definitely don't have conscious control over it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/21 08:31 PM
0

No, the world won't be a better place if it was ruled by women. because women can be as much evil as men. You are underestimating them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/21 06:00 AM
2

If TRP is too much for him, maybe try the Men's Rights angle first? The Myth of Male Power?
/r/askTRP02/05/21 03:16 PM
2

Females keep sex a hostage between them, so that they can exchange it with resources. Read Roy Baumeister, Social Suppression of Female Sexuality on this. So if the problem is that females have too much sexual power (essentially making them the sole sexual selectors) we should do what Warren Farrell has advocated in The Myth Of Male Power, i.e. limit it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/21 02:06 PM
1

OK, agreed then. It may turn out that we might need to repress female sexuality, though. And not in the way females do it among them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/21 11:48 AM
1

use them Err... OK this is the deal: given the chance, women would only have sex with the top 5% of men. That's what their lizard brain tells them. That's about what happens in settings where they have the option (e.g. dating apps, campuses etc). Men, on the other hand, would be willing to have sex with every woman they consider marginally attractive. That is, with women that don't limbicly reciprocate the desire. How can you bridge these two limbic impulses?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/21 11:11 AM
11

I guess that's another way to say that equality is never going to happen. In fact, equality is a human idea - which we all support in this sub, I guess. Nature's idea, on the other hand, is balance, which is quite different: works on genders, not individuals.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/21 06:26 AM
58

Dude, I don't say that often, but yours is a typical case: your failings are all imaginary. Don't compare your life to Tom Cruise. Compare it to the Beta bucks that's pinned down for the next twenty years to an ungrateful hag, or is divorce raped with his kids taken away and all but finished. Man is young into his 40s, and if you keep fit and healthy you can be eligible and attractive even into your 50s. Now, suppose you are a good-standing 50 year old, and looking back at your past 20 years of …
/r/askTRP01/05/21 10:34 AM
1

It's not a comment towards your personal case, of course. I'm just referencing the bigger picture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/21 11:10 PM
1

Strange logic you got there. The idea is simply to not make a virtue out of necessity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/21 07:24 PM
15

I've conflicted feelings about this. I guess if it works, it's good - I mean, Tesla did fall in love with a pigeon. On the other hand, there's an ongoing campaign by gynocentrism in order to alleviate women from their "emotional chores", and pets are certainly used for it. I believe that pets are the heart of a heartless world, the opium of men. The abolition of the love of pets as the illusory love of the men is the demand for their being trully loved.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/21 09:56 AM
2

Google "The Dark Side of Oxytocin". There's your answer.
/r/askTRP29/04/21 08:48 PM
3

It sure as hell will be different depending who the prostitute is... :) reduce the stress and anxiety men feel I believe the capacity to guiltlessly enjoy the physical aspect of sex with a prostitute is a marker of mental health, rather than mental problems. On an ideological level, this all has to do with whether you pedestalize women. Evopsych has acknowledged that "all sexual.opportunities have a cost to the male, even within marriage" - and thus has a problem defining what constitutes prosti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/21 07:12 PM
3

I understand where you're coming from, but you can find prostitutes who like you, you know ;) They are just women. Joke aside, despite popular belief, what defines female attachment is attraction, not intimacy. Women offer their intimacy to men they consider attractive. And a man having needs is limbicly unattractive, because they were not evolved to take care of a man, but to be taken care of. So, in order to be eligible for her intimacy, you must first be there where you don't need it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/21 05:27 PM
7

There was a post from RedPillSchool after that incel shooting spree, where he commented about the intimacy starvation that's imposed on some men. He wrote something like "heck, if they could even be holding hands, these kind of things wouldn't need to happen". So yeah, even TRP acknowledges men's need for intimacy. For men, there is sex as a physical need. This is comparatively non-existent in females (sex drive differential). Then, for men, there is a need for intimacy, in which sex also plays …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/21 03:13 PM
6

This, God damn it...
/r/MGTOW29/04/21 11:53 AM
13

"Relationship" and "Mysterious" don't go a long way together. In relationships you display high value by showing social proof and social competence. Her seeing you around a bunch of girl friends of yours giggling is certain to lead to intense sex back home.
/r/askTRP28/04/21 10:39 PM
2

Good game. There are many guys that have it all working like a clockwork, and then go spoil it all by marrying the girl.
/r/askTRP28/04/21 08:33 PM
1

Are you trying to initiate a political debate? No, not here. It's that political outlooks come in a package, so it's easier to make sense of what people mean. Rollo's previous book, for example, was enlightening for me. It made marriage make sense - because it was discussed within the conservative framework. So, even for a "progressive" (and I put the term in quotes because most are pseudo-prpgrassive hypocrites, but that's another story), so, even for a progressive it would make sense to approa…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/21 07:38 PM
1

I've seen some interesting ideas from the conservative viewpoint. The most revelating being that women are at their happiest when submitting to a man they consider of high value. This point of the "personal empire", though, is probably the weakest, and one that would benefit the most from incorporating the corresponding "progressive" viewpoint. The thing is that children are separate human beings. They are not an extension of yourself. Considering them an extension of the parents has wreaked hav…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/21 06:45 PM
1

I saw the video. It's great as a sales pitch. Has many gems of truth in it, too. I particularly liked "Even if he buys his mistress fries, you get the chicken". This game is perfect to get her vagina wet, in the case when you want to insert your penis in it. Then what I also see is: a man needing a vessel for his children, willing to slave away in order to be a provider (providing is always a Beta behavior in my book). Promising abundance to his prospective vessel. Burdening himself with a promi…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/21 04:20 PM
2

This
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/21 02:29 PM
3

Since you have a daughter, and seem to come from a conservative viewpoint, what's your perspective on this?: She'd want and be better off with a High Value Man. But a HVM, especially in our times, would never be tied down and always fuck around. What's her solution, then?
/r/TheRedPill28/04/21 05:54 AM
3

Congrats on your site! Interesting as hell.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 07:50 AM
-1

She's probably delusional herself. Almost all.women are, and almost all women psychologists.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 07:48 AM
6

Too little info. You can't get a direction from it. Chill, it shouldn't be a thing to worry about. I'd worry more about having an LTR for 5 years. At that time they start to get stale.
/r/askTRP27/04/21 07:43 AM
9

Your father is such a lucky guy. To have a son that understands and appreciates his struggles. Most men don't have that luxury when hypergamy hits them.
/r/askTRP26/04/21 11:11 AM
1

Of course not all women! There's Esther Vilar, Erin Pizzey, even Cassie Jaye, and other exceptions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/21 11:00 PM
9

Women view gender issues as zero-sum game, effectively making it one. "Equality" would mean actually sending women to get killed in wars in similar numbers as men. As long as they don't register and I do, I take up their chance of dying in the war, doubling mine. Yes, of course, struggle together to end all wars yada yada. But untill then, they should go get killed as much as we do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/21 03:38 PM
1

OK, I read it in detail. It's great material. It deserves some editing if you get the time. As well as some reposting in chunks, as I wrote. One issue I consider critical in the case of child support, is this: as a legacy of our evolutionary past, men and women co-evolved in societies of "socio-sexual exchange". Meaning, basically, that sex was bought by men (see providing), and social services were "bought" by women - with sex. So, when we discuss solutions to child rearing, these have to take …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/21 10:19 PM
3

Man, this blew me away! This is the kind of analyses we need! I'm saving your post to read in detail. You probably should re-post this in smaller chunks, because too few will read it being so long.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/21 03:12 PM
1

Of course not. Check out my book, The Empress is Naked
/r/askTRP24/04/21 11:44 AM
2

The Wall means they have greatly diminished access to Alpha men. There are scores of Betas, though, that are perfectly OK as men, and even objectively attractive. Women can get these into their 50's. So, in that sense, we indeed could say that no, there is no Wall.
/r/askTRP24/04/21 11:20 AM
1

不 管 黑 猫 还 是 白 猫 , 能 抓 到 老 鼠 的 就 是 好 猫 。
/r/askTRP24/04/21 11:17 AM
7

Legalized prostitution in western countrIes has been found to be safer than equal levels of sexual activity with women-outside-of-official-prostitution. (Source: in The Woman Racket)
/r/MGTOW23/04/21 06:59 PM
12

They've done that already. It's called marriage.
/r/MGTOW23/04/21 06:56 PM
1

Agreed. Prostitutes for sex, friends for intimacy is what I've been saying. It's a perfectly logical conclusion, imo. As a sidenote, though, condoms don't offer reliable disease prevention - possibly the only deal-breaker.
/r/askTRP23/04/21 05:57 AM
1

He's not talking about "cheap pleasure". He's talking about the few hundred bucks per hour type.
/r/askTRP23/04/21 05:54 AM
85

I masturbated for the last time more than 1000 days ago That is amazing, how did you do it? I'd wager with his right hand.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/21 03:42 PM
3

Creative or community work can't develop the computer in which you write; Well, it did create the Operating System...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/21 07:59 PM
23

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/14/feminism-capitalist-handmaiden-neoliberal Even a feminist can acknowledge what you say. On an even deeper level, work becoming an ethical thing is an absurdity on its own. In classical Greece, work was something slaves did. Creative or community work can align with the Left's ideal. Wage labor, no.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/21 02:17 PM
1

Double mating strategy: women will fuck only dominant men, but they need subordinate, unfuckable men for their comfort. Since they can conceive with a single fuck, but need to eat every day, a surplus of subordinates serves them better than a surplus of dominant men. They social-engineer such an arrangement by raising their sons to be subordinate to women.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/21 10:18 AM
2

It's self-explanatory, really. In the absence of actual sexual opportunities, masturbation is a psychological and physiological substitute, so that the sex drive isn't shut down. I never bought the "no-fap" hype, and there is a raging battle in psychology around whether there's such a thing as "addiction" to porn, or it is normal and even useful in some cases. I personally know men that did quite fine vitality-wise for long periods without a GF, by using prostitutes. Substitutes and alternatives…
/r/askTRP19/04/21 04:12 PM
6

Before depression, my sex drive was incredibly high, and my confidence was high too. This all stemmed from a 2 month attempt at NoFap that I didn't really need to do, just because at the time I thought "fuck it, why not?". It backfired on me when I hit the flatline, and found my sex drive almost disappeared after. That's why I became depressed, and then it spiralled from there. The evopsych theory about masturbation (and, incidentally, homosexuality) is precisely that it maintains the sex drive …
/r/askTRP19/04/21 02:57 PM
5

Needing intimacy with women can drag you down. There's no shame in that, it's normal, but it's practically non-existent for the average man. You might need to move from having lots of friends to having fewer buddies. You seem to need more deep connection, and this is only possible with male friends. The way to deepen your connection is, maybe paradoxically, by leaning on your buddies for support - and, of course, being there for them too. You build real relationships by going through struggle to…
/r/askTRP18/04/21 12:12 AM
3

But to have kids only to lose them on some bullshit? That would honestly destroy me. What chance of that happening can you tolerate? Then check what's the statistical chance of it actually happening. Compare the two, and you have your decision.
/r/askTRP17/04/21 11:06 PM
4

Sometimes it happens. E.g. about 80 years ago, in some country in Europe, it was socially acceptable to say something is wrong with all people of a specific ethnicity.
/r/MGTOW16/04/21 01:52 PM
1

So I said "Hey, if you don't wanna be in a relationship with me anymore, I'm totally fine with that", and sort of acted indifferent. She responded by saying "It sucks that we are different, because I'm so in love with you". After that, we just had a really good time with each other, watched a movie, and she fell asleep in my arms. Awww... That's such a sweet closure ritual...
/r/askTRP16/04/21 11:23 AM
3

We've made a good discussion on it: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/lmm76m/why_misandry_and_why_now_what_do_you_think/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/21 05:12 AM
28

In his legendary review Cultural Suppression of Female Sexuality, psychologist Roy Baumeister shows clearly that it is women that suppress each other, because Sex is a resource in the "possession" of women, and they hold it hostage so that they can benefit from its trade.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/21 05:03 AM
6

She gives me $2500/month? Yes, thank you.
/r/askTRP14/04/21 02:30 PM
5

Contrary perhaps to popular belief, love, in its highest form, is a conscious action. It's consciously prioritizing someone else's needs over your own. Women possess neither that level of consciousness, neither the capacity to self-sacrifice. Not for their own children, not for anyone. There's always that built-in calculator in the back of their minds: "What do I get out of this?"
/r/TheRedPill14/04/21 06:32 AM
2

Only broken women don't irrationally love their children unconditionally. Maybe you mean especially? That would be consistent with your example: My halfway BPD /narcissistic mother I'm sorry about your mother, in any case. the amount of chances she has given him is nauseating. Explains why he turned out that way. Woman's inability to provide love has many faces. I believe you are mostly confirming rather than countering my claim.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/21 04:39 AM
3

Before the onset of political correctness, the female romance novels of the 80s had a standard theme of the woman falling in love with her alpha rapist.
/r/askTRP13/04/21 12:04 PM
2

What you're feeling is normal for men. You are too young. No need to attach too much to one girl, however good she has been. On the other hand, no need to ditch her if you can manage it.
/r/askTRP13/04/21 11:05 AM
38

It's very bitter to swallow The Red Pill, i.e. that women can't love men, only "fall in love". It's even more bitter to realize that this goes for your mother as well. In fact, this is one of the hardest realities to overcome: men care about their daughters' wellbeing, and prioritize it over their own reproductive strategy. Women prioritize their own reproductive strategy over their sons' happiness. This is beyond bitter. It's nauseating. That's why common sense refuses to acknowledge it.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/21 08:53 AM
5

Whatever you do, don't let her have a maternity test. Maternity tests should be illegal, just like paternity tests are in several countries. She must take responsibility for the child, otherwise she should just have kept her pussy zipped. Good game for.scoring a child on that plate of yours. If you keep this up, you will spread your seed far and wide, and eventually become Alpha.
/r/askTRP12/04/21 11:12 PM
17

If I make suggest my book, The Empress is Naked, here. It discusses the relation of the class system with gender issues. I think there are clear social parallels between women and the petit-bourgeois.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/21 02:26 PM
28

Agreed. Anyone using shame against men when they try to describe their problems is a raging idiot.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 11:33 AM
1

US? As someone else suggested, finish your college, get an online job, then consider getting off the grid. No need for the forest: Expat life in some second- or third-world country can be great if you have an income source back home.
/r/askTRP10/04/21 09:54 PM
69

If they are dependable and staight-edge, you would be better off keeping them. Eventually you will get over the "anger phase about your friends", do your own thing, and still be able to enjoy some camaraderie with them now and then. Or you might drift away. Life will show. In any case there's nothing to gain by losing them - if they don't drag you down.
/r/askTRP10/04/21 09:46 PM
7

Why are you out with your family for your birthday, and not with your buddies?
/r/askTRP09/04/21 07:55 PM
1

Making true friends, buddies, takes time, common struggle, and supporting each other. It's more difficult in the US society than elsewhere in the world, but doable. It's a life-long process, though, that's why a lot of people still have childhood friends as buddies.
/r/askTRP09/04/21 03:36 PM
3

If there isn't such a things as a unicorn girlfriend, why would a unicorn friend exist? Because men are different than women?
/r/askTRP09/04/21 03:34 PM
2

No. It's that the issue is really too important to include in a few lines. Someone must write a researched text about it - and probably someone in the Manosphere must have, but I don't have a good link.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/21 03:26 PM
44

No need for thought experiments. Top feminist scholars have explicitly advocated for the limiting of the male population to ~10%, which will be used only for reproduction. To be clear, I'm not making things up neither overstating. These are actual propositions from an established part of the feminist movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/21 10:51 AM
3

Therapists are like prostitutes: some are really good. Most are trash. It's good that your own therapist helps you. There are limits, though. Us men have a unique way to deal with anxiety, and that is understanding. There's a specific issue that doesn't get acknowledged in mainstream psychology: that we men are programmed to love women, while women are programmed to exploit us. We are programmed to love creatures that not only are they unable to reciprocate, they have the tendency to cash in on …
/r/askTRP08/04/21 04:07 PM
33

Exposure reduces fear over time Not when there's a paranoid propaganda running.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/21 06:06 PM
2

TRP is heavily biased towards the viewpoint of upper-middle class young men. Even more heavily biased towards the far-right, the past few years. From those perspectives, "get rich - fuck sluts" makes sense (thankfully we've at least eradicated the "find a virgin to settle" parody of an end-game, that used to be talked about few years ago). There are ways to appropriate TRP's main message, which is, basically, "women can't love a man", to your own class reality and viewpoint. That is, take the bi…
/r/askTRP07/04/21 09:28 AM
2

MensRights is trying to be "the nice guy" of the Manosphere, mainly by shutting down all discussion around men's sexuality. I understand the rationale, but it won't work: eventually they will censor it too. The feminist authoritarianism doesn't tolerate an inch of dissent. The "nice guy" strategy only succeeds in forcing men, especially the younger, to look elsewhere.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:49 PM
-6

"Radicalization" is not something bad per se. Specific kinds of radicalization may be bad, other, no.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/21 02:56 PM
17

Hahaha that was a good one! Glad to see some humor in order to lighten up the discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/21 09:59 PM
4

Yes, it's hard. But it's probably the only way, if you want to find a place in society. "He's a great painter, though not so bright" is better than plainly "dumb". Even if you don't have high IQ, your emotional circuits are probably not very different from neurotypicals. You can develop these as a compensation.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 01:02 PM
22

It's usually OK to be submissive towards 40-50 year old men. If you think they are smart, you can acknowledge it - but only in a matter of fact way, no brown nosing. This generally disarms whatever tendency they may feel to bully you. You don't need to sell a fake-alpha persona around. What you need to do, though, is excell in something. That's where you draw confidence from. If you have a certified low IQ, this, apparently, cannot be academic. It can, however, perfectly be art, or something phy…
/r/askTRP05/04/21 12:18 PM
2

Seeing as MensRights is going full Blue Pill, having an MRA sub that can discuss issues of sexuality without crying out "misogynist!"whenever women are called out is useful. We'll see how it goes.
/r/askTRP05/04/21 06:07 AM
1

OK, this was impressive. I honestly didn't think there would be so many gynocentrists in MensRights, of all places. Here's what I think: The old belief that men have the power and women are powerless leads predictably to a battle between the sexes. How? The perception of women as powerless makes us fear limiting the expansion of women's power. Fear of limiting the power of the sex with the greater spending power, the greater beauty power, the greater sexual power, the greater net worth among its…
/r/MensRights04/04/21 08:22 PM
0

Wow! Dudes, I'm honored. It's a fine White Knight parade.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 12:25 PM
-29

Yes, I can explain of course. But I'll wait a bit more, see how many White Knights will downvote me first.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 07:18 AM
-38

(Oops I hooked a White Knight) Why? Don't you want to have equal opportunities in sex, as the average woman?
/r/MensRights04/04/21 07:00 AM
5

There are phone apps nowadays. You can see how they'll look in 10, 20 years. Do you still want to commit?
/r/MGTOW04/04/21 06:58 AM
-63

We mean equal opportunities to have sex with members of the opposite sex we consider attractive.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 06:51 AM
0

Agreed. Still, incredibly advanced for a Left-wing sub. Its good point is they don't suffer from traditionalist nostalgia, as seems to be the trend in MensRights, or mgtow anti-sexuality.
/r/askTRP04/04/21 03:36 AM
-1

LeftWingMaleAdvocates is surprisingly good.
/r/askTRP04/04/21 02:35 AM
14

It's "her body, her choice", unless she chooses to sell it, in which case she undermines her fellow sisters' monopoly over the sexual market. Legalizing prostitution should be top priority for men. I discuss gender dynamics from the specific perspective of sexuality in my book, The Empress Is Naked: From Female Privilege to Gender Equality and Social Liberation, check it out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/21 06:00 PM
1

There's a big problem when trying to use notions from Biology to describe social issues: that the notions therein are different. In Biology, (that is, generally, in animals), "monogamous" generally means "mating exclusively for the yearly mating season". It doesn't mean for life, as is the assumption in human society. There are very-very few exceptions where animals do mate for life, e.g. famously the prairie voles, but these mostly refer to animals that have very sparse social structures and wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/21 09:18 AM
1

I don't agree with this notion of "alpha" and "beta", but just as an ontological point I think characterizations still exist even if they are not fixed. For example, happy men and sad men exist (at some point in time) even if happiness and sadness are not fixed states. The key issue here is that there is such a thing as a female world of perception, and it's very different from the male one. Females may very well discuss about how awesome a guy is at one minute, and what a complete creep he is t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 08:31 PM
3

One idea that helps a lot in clearing up the landscape is this: there needn't be a sexual strategy for the species. Males and females can have divertering strategies. So, human females may very well be endowed by evolution with a gorilla-like sexual strategy. Look what they do, not what they say. Strong, high-status, muscular men are those that all women select. G. Miller explicitly states that "intelligence" for women only means "social intelligence", i.e.,.status -again. No love for nerds what…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 08:05 PM
0

No they don't. Learn to read accurately, works wonders for understanding. They suggest that Betas may provide validation to other men, not that they are attracted to men. So, a man providing validation, either to women or to men, is viewed as "Beta", i.e. unattractive, by women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 09:53 AM
1

That's the kind of trouble you run into when trying to force-fit female, emotional states to male, ontological notions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 09:03 AM
6

I just bought a box of Swiss chocolate (the best!) for my boyfriend's wife's boyfriend.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/21 07:32 AM
3

Failing to grasp women's dual mating strategy is probably the greatest failure of the Left (and of every individual man that does so). "The evolution of Human Female Sexuality" is the go-to scholarly book. I've found that a great way to illustrate it is to think of it as in-tribe, incestuous sex (Beta), vs "exciting", "Alpha" sex with a handsome mysterious stranger, i.e. out-group, so not-incestuous. It certainly is a thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 05:36 AM
2

In order to understand monogamy, you first need to understand polygamy. Over the previous "arrangement", Marriage, first in the form of Polygyny, introduced permanency. And that was hugely in favor of women: they could now be supported obligatorily by their rich husbands, for all their lives. Later, when the celibate poor became a threat, the ruling class and women were forced to concede to the allocation of women to lower strata. Permanency remained (women rejoice), but now they can't officiall…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 05:29 AM
2

I've found that right-wingers are especially prone to that complex. Not all men have it, but some certainly do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 05:16 AM
5

Thanks. It's becoming a luxury even having someone getting the message. We can't really expect to deconstruct "the system" when we have difficulty grasping the notions...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 05:01 AM
8

The original post is actionable advice, and very solid too. It's what we focus on, around here. "Be that way" is too generic to be of any help.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/21 11:08 AM
6

The post is not about dance. It's about social proof. Google what that is, and read it again.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/21 11:06 AM
4

If you go in to the argument with that mindset You think this is my initial approach? It is my conclusion. And the conclusion of just about everyone who has tried discussing with feminists in the past 20 or more years. Now, there is the example of Cassie Jay. Some of them can even be won over. But it takes ludicrous effort and, what's more, the proper conditions. And, as again the example of Cassie Jay shows, it's temporary: in the end, it's not their fight, to fight for true equality. When "won…
/r/MensRights01/04/21 06:34 AM
5

I used to think the same. Even known plenty of "type 1"s and worked with them in the past. 99% have turned to Type 2. It is tried, and it doesn't work. "Egalitarian" feminism must be declared dead.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 08:49 PM
14

The only reason to argue with a feminist is when you want to convince a watcher. Feminists are beyond reason.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 08:14 PM
3

forgive everyone who wronged you if you can I'd been so buffled by that notion of forgiveness, until I realized it's something only religious people need. You don't need to forgive. Ignore, or fuck them over. Ignoring is better. If you can't do that, then fuck them over.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/21 03:48 PM
1

This.
/r/askTRP31/03/21 11:38 AM
3

You really don't want to impose all these problems on you and your future children. Next.
/r/MarriedRedPill31/03/21 11:12 AM
8

i imagine that long ago people weren't as shitty as today Cheer up: long ago, people were as shitty as today. It's been like that ever since women acquired the sexual veto (see Leonard Shlain's book).
/r/MGTOW30/03/21 09:34 AM
12

Just in case you don't know, in Islam you are allowed to have multiple wives.
/r/MGTOW30/03/21 05:18 AM
0

it's full of patronizing people No it isn't. Don't be such a baby! ;)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/21 12:59 PM
27

I'm sorry that ... Don't. Don't fucking be sorry. Stop apologizing for being angry. Anger is no less a valid feeling than love. The prohibition of being angry is a big part of men's problems today. Of course, this doesn't mean act out your anger. You have to see what you do with it, and I propose become an activist. But do feel it when it comes, it means that you are normal. Most of the friends I have had are female Here's your problem, right here. Get male friends. Start a male sport, find a ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/21 10:08 AM
5

Why the fuck would he want to implement the desperate strategies in MRP when he is not married? This is a clear case of Next. That relationship did its course over 5 years. The best times are behind, and are never coming back. Time to find another one, that would be thrilled to fuck him. 5 years more, then Next.
/r/askTRP28/03/21 07:55 PM
6

Move out again.
/r/MarriedRedPill28/03/21 07:51 PM
1

The Passengers you can watch with a girl. It's not "Red Pill", but feminists hated it.
/r/askTRP27/03/21 07:14 AM
3

Reach out to a help line or a therapist. It can't hurt you.
/r/askTRP26/03/21 08:56 PM
3

"Left pilled"!!! Great term!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/21 07:46 AM
7

Agreed. We've instituted rights for women It's high time we discussed obligations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/21 10:39 AM
8

From a historical perspective, feminism was probably one of the best things to happen for the Left: it has proved beyond doubt that "unisex gender equality" is not possible. The system, itself, plays between Feminism and Traditionalism. Just like the Democrats and the Republicans, they are both expressions of the system (gynocentrism), and which version is adopted at every historical moment depends on several factors.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/21 10:17 AM
21

Yup. In fact, the whole feminist notion of an oppressing "Patriarchy" is projecting. It's an image of the oppression that they would institute if they had the "hard" power (instead of the "soft" power women traditionally wielded). And, hey, you know what? It's what they are in fact doing now , that feminism is indeed the undisputed policy of hard power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/21 07:02 AM
18

You escaped with no kids? You got that lesson so cheap? And asking for advice about overcoming jealousy? Just get the congratulations and be happy.
/r/askTRP24/03/21 09:13 PM
8

This. Betting your whole life on a long shot, with a 10% max probability, isn't justified from the results even if you accidentally hit it. "Brian" 's biggest failure was failing to find a meaning in his life that didn't include women. 10% is too generous...
/r/TheRedPill24/03/21 12:41 PM
4

use disclaimers liberally. Old members can follow this, no problem. But if you try to enforce it even for newcomers, there will be problems. It turns to preemptive self-censoring. A good rule of thumb would be "We will not accept shaming as a means of censorship against men for thinking or feeling as men". I personally believe the mission statement of the sub is disclaimer enough for what is stands. Choosing between the danger of self-censorship and of having the sub quarantined is no easy task,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/21 10:37 AM
5

The bulk of women are not ok with being hit on in public by men of Low Sexual Market Value, I.e. "creeps". FTFU
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/21 10:28 AM
3

In Homer, chivalrous treatment is reserved only for members of the higher classes. Enemy commoners can be backstabbed at will. Peter Wright in "Gynocentrism" describes how chivalry was directed towards the nobility and women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/21 10:26 AM
15

As a man, society tells you you've got to make it or fuck off. These guys decide to take some of the "society" with them, when they "fuck off". Yes, it is really so obvious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/21 10:21 AM
22

Amazing wording. Kudos.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/21 10:15 AM
8

You can research "The Dark Side of Oxytocin" (it's the typically "female" hormone), see a bit of the reality they bathe in. Limbic reactions can be overridden by logic, even in women, but they need to be overridden, otherwise they remain limbic.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 09:30 PM
6

When discussing social and gender issues, everything is a distribution. This is basic knowledge. So "women" is short for "women, predominantly..." etc.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 09:05 PM
4

Google "distribution".
/r/MensRights21/03/21 08:56 PM
146

Women feel that their "country", their "nationality", is womanhood. In science, it's called an in-group bias. It's essentially gender racism. We men like and are positive towards the majority of women, we consider them human beings. It's not the same with women. They consider the majority of men to be below-human.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 06:55 PM
24

There is one way I've found that gives meaning to your life when you are facing a system that is rigged against you: fighting against that system. (If someone has found another, please share). Invest in your male friendships, focus on things that you enjoy, and fight against gynocentrism. Prostitutes for sex, friends for intimacy. It's not that bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/21 11:12 AM
1

A large part of the reason why I have very high standards for myself and work hard in the gym, to make money, to learn and to get girls is because I look at him and don't want to end up the same. So he set you up on the Alpha road after all. Probably not a healthy motivation, and it most likely won't lead to happiness. Nah, it's a motivation. It's as healthy motivatiion as any. You make your own happiness, not your dad. He'll remain behind, and eventually die. You'll go forward.
/r/askTRP21/03/21 07:08 AM
4

This. Only kids have a dad and mom. Adults have other adults whom think worthy of relating to, or not. You don't have to carry their own problems and limitations.
/r/askTRP21/03/21 06:58 AM
2

Prostitutes for sex, frinds for intimacy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/21 10:37 AM
50

Monk mode is definitely not about avoiding "all pleasure". Despite its name, it doesn't require ascetism. At some point of your life, you might realize that your "value" (mainly, SMV) is too low. That you are lacking several qualities. These have two main categories: 1) Social skills, 2) Other. Monk mode is about upping 2, i.e. "Other" than social skills. That's it. That's monk mode. You don't have to cut-off completely from society. You just realize that, since your value is too low, you will b…
/r/askTRP18/03/21 03:04 PM
3

Feminism is essentially far-right. They literally think that men, the out-group, are less than human, and that women, their in-group, is superior.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/21 06:04 AM
2

I didn't fully get your post, but the fact is that quite a few "gender expectations" are built into our biology, and "breaking them down" necessarily means going against our instincts. For example, we shouldn't have the gender expectation to protect females during fights. We should be totally OK with them getting their faces bruised if they are agressive, the same way we do for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/21 02:37 PM
9

Yes he is a scumbag, but the responsibility for all this is 100% the wife's.
/r/MGTOW17/03/21 11:20 AM
15

Aaand of course, there is the classic fucking scumbag (please propose a better term) in the comments, who suggests that "dad" was working too much and neglecting the wife, that's why she did it.
/r/MGTOW17/03/21 11:05 AM
36

She might have a personality disorder, and found feminism as the field to express it (not uncommon). If it is that way, there is unfortunately nothing you can do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/21 06:54 PM
5

Of course you can learn "Alpha". Alpha refers to the female perception, not the man per se. It's not ontological, as notions are in the male world, it refers to whether the female perceives you as worthy to fuck or not. Tick the right boxes, DGAF, and you can get there. The trick is to do the things you enjoy, and which incidentally increase your SMV. Otherwise it's a drag.
/r/MGTOW15/03/21 03:53 PM
1

You could LTR two girls, you know. Think about that.
/r/askTRP15/03/21 06:02 AM
5

This guy gets it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/21 08:56 PM
3

Of course. With "you" I mean to say "one".
/r/TheRedPill13/03/21 06:45 PM
6

It takes time to really swallow how things truly are, and find a way to exist and be content. But it's doable. It's more difficult when you are Left-wing, because at the critical point we are standing the old left-wing certainties crumble as well. And I'm referring mainly to the idea that the sexes evolved to cooperate rather than antagonize. Again, it takes time to come to peace with it, and adjust your expectations and life choices accordingly. At least, she's your ex, and not your current!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/21 06:12 PM
12

I was so perplexed about that new notion, "closure", when I saw it. What the fuck was that? I was perplexed because that solipsistic ritual is so alien to the male soul. Men don't have "closure". Grief, sure. We grieve. But you have to be a special kind of bullshitter to need "closure".
/r/TheRedPill13/03/21 07:17 AM
0

You seem to think that radicalization is something bad. There's a radical Left too, you know. They'd say that lukewarm petit-bourgeois politics that leave exploitation in place is worse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/21 05:19 AM
6

She deleted it, but you get the sentiment. "Be a stud, or eat shit and die, because sex with someone less than a God is rape." It's what's colloquially known as "the law of the jungle", or "female empathy."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/21 05:13 AM
9

that I still regret "Whatever you do, you'll regret it". It's a perk than comes with having the agency of a man. You'd have regretted LTRing them too, probably, so it wasn't a definite loss.
/r/askTRP13/03/21 04:58 AM
22

Men and women are brainwashed to think only women can be oppressed. This builds on the pro-female bias that evolution has installed in both men and women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/21 09:36 PM
168

I’ve never been in an LTR Then go ahead. Seems you are young enough. It's one thing to keep hearing "spin plates all the way", and another to have tasted LTRs and the Beta-ization process first hand, and decided it by yourself. As long as you don't get her pregnant, you have just a plate to lose.
/r/askTRP12/03/21 05:59 PM
3

Check out my posts, I've written some about marriage and having kids.
/r/askTRP12/03/21 08:24 AM
15

Post this in the main sub.
/r/askTRP11/03/21 11:33 AM
8

"I believe there is no point in arguing with feminists." - Roy Baumeister
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/21 09:56 AM
0

OK this is a tough one. There are too many prerequisites to grasping it, so I get why you are saying this. Shouldn't need to be explained that gender equality isn't a zero sum game "Gender equality" isn't a game at all. It is a hypothesis. Anyway.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/21 02:03 PM
0

This sounds interesting. Please, tell me more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/21 01:38 PM
8

Don't overthink it. The simple answer is raise your SMV value. If she perceives you are way higher than her, she'll consider you a sex god in bed too, whatever you do.
/r/askTRP08/03/21 11:14 AM
2

(I wrote this, and then I saw I was second:) I work 80 hour weeks Start here. Bring it down to ~40. You can't realistically expect to have a social life with that many hours working. If you are supporting your family, stop. You will burn out, sooner rather than later.
/r/askTRP08/03/21 11:09 AM
-4

First thing would be to get a good grasp of whether there is such a thing as a "war of the sexes", and pick side. Esther Vilar's "The Manipulated Man" would be your starting point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/21 10:40 AM
4

It's just a bit at the far end of the distribution, but it's normal for a modern girl. She's got a steady desirable man, and she's exploring her limits, with how much shit she can get away with. One of you two is going to play dread on the other.
/r/askTRP07/03/21 10:35 AM
2

After what Leonard Shlain in Sex, Time and Power ingeniously identified as the starting point for the war between the sexes, i.e. women's acquiring the sexual veto, men where left dumbfounded: the notion of some kind of "original sin" emerged as a "collective unconscious" (mythological) justification of men's psychological agony. Christianity and Hercules' struggles are only two examples of a mythological construct that can be found in cultures around the world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/21 06:19 PM
85

"When it works, it's flirting. When it doesn't, it's harassment". Warren Farrell
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/21 11:50 AM
1

Yes, it's way too much for just videos. You could've gotten personal counseling for that much money (I know Rian Stone does that).
/r/askTRP05/03/21 11:27 AM
1

How much was that, if you don't mind?
/r/askTRP05/03/21 10:51 AM
1

What you are feeling is that LTRs, almost all of them, are a blackmail: "Be exclusive otherwise there is no sex". The problem is that even if you capitulate to the blackmail, the blackmailer remains a blackmailer. Women operate this way. That's why we advocate for being attractive and spinning plates. You then have women coming to you for sex out of attraction, and you remain in a position of power against those that have no other ethics than those of attraction and power.
/r/askTRP05/03/21 07:51 AM
2

Yes, you are naive. Women around the world are not worthy of marriage. Marriage is an institution insanely rigged. Those that say otherwise are clueless.
/r/askTRP04/03/21 03:34 PM
-1

Amen.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/21 07:10 AM
18

Anatomy of female power: A masculinist dissection of matriarchy by Chinweizu, an African philosopher, is one of the most insightful books I've read.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/21 07:09 AM
8

You 've got plenty of good advice in the replies. The "pro" answer is to get the mileage you can out of this situation, then bail. Then again, we men learn from experience. You can test an LTR, provided you get extra-certain to not get her pregnant. At the least, it will teach you that spinning plates is the best way to go.
/r/askTRP03/03/21 12:32 PM
1

Of course it's possible. You just need to flirt her mother, in that occasion. Now is the time to notice how fascinating an individual that old hag really is. "Daughter, did you notice how gentle and respectable that fine young man was?" Women are like tillers, they are never truly separate from their mothers. Get into the mother's head => get into the daughter's pussy.
/r/askTRP02/03/21 02:21 PM
7

The noble cause of putting our dick in a vagina is so strong as to unite us men here. It applies to all of us, because we all have a dick, and all of our dicks desire to be put in vaginas. When you try to extend Red Pill to other areas, a lot of shit happens. Of course, the system has lied to us in several other ways. For example, that communism is a bad thing. No, it is actually a good one. That getting rich is worth the trouble. No, it is usually not worth it. That a stable, fidel, loving wife…
/r/TheRedPill02/03/21 01:08 PM
9

That was maybe true a few years ago, but things are changing. Check out the LeftWingMaleAdvocates subreddit, for example. They are not RedPilled (yet?) but they are beginning to grasp how things are. In several aspects they are more advanced than MensRights (the sub).
/r/askTRP02/03/21 10:35 AM
10

It's not just feminism. All racist ideologies work this way, dehumanization of the opposite side is at their core.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/21 07:55 AM
2

A few years after I wrote it, I randomly googled and found my book reviewed on Nice Guy's (an MGTOW figure) page. https://www.the-niceguy.com/ I read his book, and, years before I wrote my book, he'd wrote "Why don't people get how women are? Why is nobody shouting 'The Empress Is Naked?'" Turns out that, when cleared from preconceptions, minds have a way to converge in truth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/21 07:32 AM
1

Could I get "The empress is naked" ? Thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/21 06:32 AM
128

We do have a rule, no examples from fiction. I propose you rewrite this. In college romances, the nerd gets the girl. Hollywood is not a reliable source of knowledge.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/21 10:41 PM
1

The world is ruled by "the elite", which is mostly male. Women being so preoccupied tying to fuck with them, men is the only demographic possibly threatening. That's as much true today, as it was since class society emerged. That's why women were always favored, either by being permitted to stay home and avoid work, i.e. the "Patriarchy"(!), or, the modern gynocentrism, i.e. feminism.
/r/askTRP28/02/21 10:19 PM
5

I thought the analogy is clear. The ruling class in the US is treating its subjects like cattle, and is promoting childbirth even when there exist no humane conditions for the child, in order to populate its working force.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/21 09:04 PM
1

As long as females have more reproduction rights than men, actually all the rights vs none, things get really nasty. For example, one could argue, from a left-wing perspective, against free education for all: why men that are excluded from reproduction should be required to contribute to a a taxation system which finances education for children that have no chance of being theirs? You might have heard about the "experiment" of the US about having black women produce baby-slaves, somewhere on an …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/21 04:53 PM
0

You are supposed to clearly tag yourself if you are not Left-wing, in order to participate in this sub. This is a heated issue for left-wingers as it is, you are imposing too much of a strain requiring accommodation of your particular opinion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/21 04:24 PM
6

Of course. Commitment to a post-wall woman is not what I recommend, it's only a worst-case fallback for those that worry they won't make it like you. If there's one good thing about feminism, is that it fills the world with girls dying for a strong father figure.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/21 12:56 PM
4

Hmmm... Sounds like the kind of girl that got many of us here.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/21 09:00 AM
-2

This idea goes around a lot, "an old man chasing kids around is not a great idea or enjoyable". I don't think it makes any sense. First, children are overrated. I can only see them make sense for men as a desperate attempt at belonging. Only then are they "enjoyable". I'd be willing to make an exception if you are so rich that you have no need to work to support them. Second, if your blood still boils, children are not interesting. Slow change curve, so high powered men will get bored and irrita…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/21 08:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter