TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aetheralloy Archive

View 25 posts and 6,452 comments by aetheralloy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
255

aetheralloy/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:46 AM
71

aetheralloy/r/MensRights26/03/11 10:48 PM
50

aetheralloy/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:27 PM
48

aetheralloy/r/MensRights24/04/12 01:53 AM
31

aetheralloy/r/MensRights06/12/11 06:26 AM
23

aetheralloy/r/MensRights13/04/11 12:39 PM
23

aetheralloy/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:00 AM
23

aetheralloy/r/MensRights29/03/11 05:59 AM
17

aetheralloy/r/MensRights29/12/11 09:53 PM
11

aetheralloy/r/MensRights01/04/11 05:58 AM
11

aetheralloy/r/MensRights23/03/11 09:17 AM
10

aetheralloy/r/MensRights23/12/11 05:03 PM
6

aetheralloy/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:12 PM
5

aetheralloy/r/MensRights15/04/11 01:55 PM
5

aetheralloy/r/MensRights11/03/11 06:34 PM
5

aetheralloy/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:33 AM
5

aetheralloy/r/MensRights08/03/11 02:19 AM
4

aetheralloy/r/MensRights19/01/11 02:49 AM
3

aetheralloy/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:01 PM
1

aetheralloy/r/MensRights26/11/11 01:58 AM
0

aetheralloy/r/MensRights25/04/12 03:49 AM
0

aetheralloy/r/MensRights10/04/11 02:22 AM
0

aetheralloy/r/MensRights22/03/11 10:18 PM
0

aetheralloy/r/MensRights17/03/12 09:15 PM
0

aetheralloy/r/MensRights30/12/11 11:27 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 6,452 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It's a step in the right direction and showing signs of how men's rights really has been purposefully suppressed and attacked by many aspects of feminism. Perhaps in a couple more years we'll finally be able to speak about these issues without feminists outright attacking us. ... til then...
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:05 AM
-1

The ones are the left are men. The ones on the right are boys. Just look at the age difference. Kids do stupid things, then once they realize women get tired of it - they grow up. Being a shock-jock "alternative" teenager works right about until college is over, then they become a running joke.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 07:14 PM
-1

lol That's your response? That's your showing of feminism being willing to sacrifice in the interests of overall equality? Get the fuck out of here with that inane irrelevant crap, man.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 04:21 PM
2

This person is a feminist, and they shouldn't have to feel guilty for the actions of feminist groups Guilty? Fuck guilt. They should be aware of the actions though.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 04:20 PM
-2

Uh huh. Just what exactly have you done? Feminists claim that shit, but haven't actually done a damn thing. Also - "for the rights all of creatures that I share this earth with" sounds pretty fucking hokey, like bullshit. I get the feeling you're about to vomit up some line about how fighting the patriarchy helps men too.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 09:25 AM
1

Sorry but that's all horse-shit. Feminists are not interested in a compromise with men in the interests of overall equality. Not once in any situation ever has feminism been willing to sacrifice anything in the interests of overall equality - not EVER. It is always more for women, in every circumstance. Even getting them to accept fundamentals like that there can be sexism against men is a near impossible task.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 01:50 AM
3

You seem to be operating under the flawed assumption that feminists had not already attacked us.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 01:38 AM
16

How this all works: Women complain about how men have it better. Pretends to be men, find it ridiculously humiliating trying to interact with women who are incredibly dismissive of them. "Sensitive" falls flat. Men pretend to be women online, are absolutely giggly in awe with how well-treated they are and how everything is given to them on a silver platter. Women complain about having to slave at home while men get to enjoy going to work. They try switching. Men are absolutely giggly in awe with…
/r/MensRights31/05/12 12:40 AM
8

"Women behaving badly don't real"
/r/MensRights30/05/12 11:05 PM
-4

Horse-shit. I also see in your post history advocating jezebel.com? WTF There's a constant pressure from people like you that for MRA's to be "legitimate", we have to cowtow and behave as feminists deign to allow us to - that we have to surrender to the very forces trying to marginalize men. Fuck that.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 07:45 PM
1

Wow you sure are goddamn hateful. As for mra's being anti-feminist, perhaps you should educate yourself more on why before coming here and ranting your bile-filled posts.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 07:42 PM
3

tl;dr "FEMINISM ISN'T ABOUT HATING MEN YOU GODDAMN FUCKING MALES! WHERE THE FUCKING FUCK DID YOU SHITLORDS GET THE IDEA THAT FEMINISM WASN'T BITTER MEN-HATERS?"
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:28 PM
2

This is the same Aerik who constantly propagandizes for radical feminism, killing men, and stripping them of rights. Class act, that one.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:23 PM
3

You are talking but didn't even read the fucking link. Instead you're just pushing your own fucked up feminist agenda. THAT is why you are a feminist fool. READ THE LINK.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:21 AM
5

Exactly. It is a human rights and drug war issue - NOT a "war on women" issue. Massively more men die than woman in it, yet you try to portray it like it's "femicide"? What. The. Fuck. You are just a feminist fool.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 11:07 PM
22

How it works: 99 men are killed - "Whatever. It's a drug war". and 1 woman is killed - "IT'S A WAR ON WOMEN"
/r/MensRights28/05/12 03:18 PM
3

WTF did I just read.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 02:36 PM
5

It is because of the perception that a woman alone chose to be, but a man alone couldn't get a woman.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 05:18 PM
12

You know when you hear about how government wants its citizens to live in fear - fear of crime, fear of terrorists, fear of losing security? That fear is a powerful tool, and the more you can make the citizenry afraid and paranoid - the more you can control them. It isn't even a rational thing. It's like how people are afraid of sharks but drive everyday to work - nevermind that vastly more people die in car accidents. Guess who the most ripe targets for that fear culture are? Target them, get t…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 05:13 PM
1

I think it definitely needs to include women molesting boys, particularly getting pregnant by them. It also needs to include when women have plied men with alcohol. It also needs to include when men and women have sex but the man didn't enthusiastically say "yes"
/r/MensRights25/05/12 05:03 PM
6

No such thing. I've worked in software for two decades. The only reason female programmers aren't hired is if they are completely incompetent. The industry is desperate for female programmers and sexism against women programmers isn't tolerated. Nerds don't like racism or sexism at work - for obvious reasons. Programming is one of the most pure meritocracies you'll find. Programming isn't a clockpuncher job though, it's a lifestyle. The women I know who are lifestyle programmers are perfectly go…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 02:32 PM
-2

I don't know how to put this nicely, but if she was stupid enough to get $300,000 into debt before graduating, then she's too stupid to get out of it. Unless she can find a chump.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 12:31 AM
2

Impossible, feminists say this isn't a problem and it doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:18 PM
9

That's because it isn't really about money or success. A man who makes a ton of money but doesn't marry and have children, is to women - useless. This is really about trying to shame men into being providers.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 06:37 PM
15

Most men think of those women as "awesome" and highly prize them. Anyway, the "playing video games is horrible!" thing is stupid. It's how I got into programming and now that's how I make more money than the person who wrote that article. Porn, well that's just the age old complaint about not being able to control men via the pussy cartel.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:33 PM
38

How it works: If men do it to women, it's sexism. If women do it to men, it's fine men can handle it.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:31 PM
4

That description from slate reads like "Feminists seeking to prove rape culture come up with hilariously flawed test, achieved initial desired result."
/r/MensRights24/05/12 09:17 AM
7

This is why I generally like 2xc. She assaulted him - physically attacked him. All that other stuff where he was a cliche of a jerk was just her making cover. The commenters called her on that and pointed out she assaulted him, that physical violence isn't justified. The op in that thread has issues and I can see her doing the same thing in a domestic violence situation, because he "said something mean" She was lucky, if a guy hit a girl in front of others like that - not only would he have been…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 09:09 AM
10

Meanwhile all the women on facebook, texting, and farmville are curing cancer.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:20 AM
18

/r/mensrights is gay-friendly and gay-rights-friendly. The only people who claim otherwise are stereotyping anti-mra's.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:35 PM
2

Eventually they got tired of being put off and made trouble till they earned their rights. There's a lesson there for MRA's. What you said is also what we should point out whenever feminists try to whataboutthemenz-shame.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 03:36 AM
40

Another spin on what's ours is hers and what's hers is hers.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:05 AM
6

Transphobic feminist? So what she really means is "fuck everyone else. women-born-women come first in everything."
/r/MensRights22/05/12 09:25 PM
5

Oh, well your friend is ignorant.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:33 PM
3

Your friend doesn't believe false rape accusations are real? Like... she doesn't believe that ever happens?
/r/MensRights22/05/12 10:05 AM
1

"You folks" rolls eyes
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:53 PM
6

You're just spewing bullshit now.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 06:39 PM
6

Yes. I agree that blatant lying propaganda is a problem. You should attack the blatantly lying propaganda instead of us. If you can't see how the below is openly misrepresentative horse-shit, then it's because you don't want to: er than joining us in our anti-sexism agenda, these men are attempting to fight back against vagina-wielding harpies by reasserting their masculinity in a way that is not only misogynistic but also deeply conservative. Fighting sexism means fighting it in all its forms i…
/r/MensRights21/05/12 06:31 PM
9

It was fitting for a blatant troll like your's. You should get down on your knees thanking me for even replying to that crap you posted.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 02:35 PM
14

Other than all of it?
/r/MensRights21/05/12 02:13 PM
0

"Sit perfectly still and quiet for 10 hours a day for the first 18 years of your life" "Why aren't boys succeeding!" "Why do so many people have sedentary lifestyles???"
/r/MensRights21/05/12 11:10 AM
1

How it works: If women are behind - it's because men are oppressing them. If women are ahead - it's because of their inherent biological superiority. If men are behind - it's because they are lazy. If men are ahead - it's because they are privileged.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 11:08 AM
2

Behind every man who kills himself, is a woman, and a horde of women encouraging it and laughing about it.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 10:57 AM
75

In before a feminist comes in here and says that doesn't represent all feminists... instead of going there and saying it.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 10:32 AM
36

Situation: Two people went out drinking and had sex. Feminists: "It was rape! I mean he raped her, not her him!"
/r/MensRights20/05/12 02:52 PM
8

Problem: Girls outpacing boys. Solution: Give girls more advantage!
/r/MensRights20/05/12 02:50 PM
3

Aww you're cute. Naively stupid and gullible... but cute. The movie I referenced, 2011 A Separation is not some Hollywood bullshit! Educate yourself. Do you read what you write?
/r/MensRights20/05/12 01:25 PM
2

I'm saying that most of the things you need a spouse for have disappeared. It doesn't mean it isn't a "real" relationship if you have have a machine wash dishes instead of a spouse. Furthermore, when you say "If your spouse is not your ego partner, not your psychologist and emotional best friend "... jesus fucking christ... You've been sold some hollywood bullshit. That crap was only ever marketing hype. That's half the problem today - the hollywood fantasy of the perfect true-love-happily-ever-…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 01:14 PM
7

Freedom seems the wrong word. She gets "freedom" by forcing him into child support,alimony, and entitlement to half of everything. Why wouldn't she get divorced? It's a golden ticket. As for robots... it is all ready that way. Modern appliances make short work of housework. I have "robotic" dishwasher, clothes washing and drying, vacuum, coffee/breakfast maker. You see a lot of modern moms using nannies, tv, the school system, daycare - as proxy mothers. Who needs a spouse anymore for anything b…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 12:54 PM
5

Ask them about the pressure to initially marry, abuse and expectations during the marriage, how things were split in the divorce, and what their view on marriage is now after being divorced. Finally ask them if there's anything they'd say to young men thinking about getting married.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 09:03 AM
5

It's worse for guys actually... A woman only has to be attractive. A man has to be both attractive and wealthy. Women are physically objectified. However men are both physically and financially objectified, although if he goes to more extreme on one - he doesn't have to as much on the other.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 08:29 PM
4

Both religions, feminism, and political correctness all try to control people with shame. Shame on men for being sexual creatures. Shame on men for not being women. Shame on men for things that happened 100 years ago. There is really not much difference between how religion, feminism, and political correctness operate. They are all ivory towers trying to tell the plebes how to behave and using shame as their weapon.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 04:08 PM
1

You're being intentionally obtuse here: Women : Can wear skirts or pants. Men : Can only wear pants. That's anti-male sexism, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 07:50 AM
2

speaking as a rich man, you're crazy
/r/MensRights19/05/12 07:00 AM
7

What business do lesbians have demanding inclusion to a male safe space?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:40 PM
3

True.. feminists take any attack or rebuttal to feminism as misogyny and more proof of how important and needed they are. You could point at for instance... Have a discussion about How it is reverse racism to have feminists protesting a men's center meant to balance out the woman's center - and you'd have feminists calling the discussion about that misogyny
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:14 PM
5

When talking about Jezebel, using the term "harpy" is being kind.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:00 PM
5

Jezebel is the 4chan of feminism. Just accept that they are hateful bitter harpies and avoid it.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:47 PM
5

Don't forget their mainstay : shifting definitions
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:27 PM
6

I don't get it. Feminists say this doesn't happen. The indian government says women have no motive to lie about rape. Posters come here and tell me recording others is wrong. The only possible conclusion is that article cannot exist.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 02:59 PM
3

No, because everyone knows black people are more violent. It's part of their DNA and it's time what white people stopped letting black people have a pass on it. We need to protect white people from the one-sided abuse from black people. Everyone knows white people hardly ever attack black people. I hope everyone who read that paragraph became offended and realizes how fucked up it is that you'd accept it if we replaced "black" with "male" and "white" with "women"
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:41 PM
3

So... now if he becomes abusive after, then he can sue her for driving him to it? Since he was fine before?
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:39 PM
0

Far more common than any fraud by alleged victim... I wish I could ask him "citation needed"
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:35 PM
10

Clearly they can and did. http://www.ehow.com/facts_6884118_statute-limitations-establish-paternity.html
/r/MensRights17/05/12 05:58 PM
12

In the U.S., that's pretty much how it works. If he's quick to contest the claim he might avoid it. If he misses the 30-day deadline he's screwed, even if he later proves he isn't. The very wealthy, with far more money for lawyers, have more protection against it. Most men don't though.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 05:29 PM
11

You're STILL missing the point here. HE has to prove he isn't. SHE doesn't have to do anything but accuse. That's not any better. It's actually worse.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 05:20 PM
5

How is it fair that the man can't prove he isn't without dna evidence? ... and can't get a paternity test without permission. The legal system is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty - the onus should never be on the accused to prove themselves innocent. It should be on the accusers to provide proof.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 05:14 PM
2

Repeating this information so you know where the SPLC is getting their "information" from (hint, it's /r/shitredditsays) http://www.reddit.com/r/antisrs/comments/srf2a/a_voice_for_men_blog_outs_srs_and_littletiger_as/ Specifically these shots: http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/srs-screen-1.jpg http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/srs-screen-2.jpg http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/srs-screen-3.jpg
/r/MensRights17/05/12 11:31 AM
8

Yes. http://www.reddit.com/r/antisrs/comments/srf2a/a_voice_for_men_blog_outs_srs_and_littletiger_as/ Specifically these shots: http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/srs-screen-1.jpg http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/srs-screen-2.jpg http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/srs-screen-3.jpg
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:07 PM
3

In other news, it seems that Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, and Larry Ellison are all about to father an absolutely massive amount of Irish children once the new legislation goes active.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:57 PM
10

...because there are people at SRS who evidently work in the same building and push them to.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:08 PM
15

The notion of unidirectional sexism or racism is one of the great intellectual failures of political correctness.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 12:26 PM
7

It is a victory because it puts a stop to a type of sexism against boys that was only 'ever brought up' because of the attitude that it's okay to be sexist against boys but not girls.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 04:12 AM
2

What misogyny? College guys are idiots too.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 11:20 PM
2

I think it ignores the massive issue of feminists who claim one thing yet do another. I don't really care how many times they say they believe in equality if they go right out and work against it, because "women used to have it worse"
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:04 PM
4

Not in the U.S. though.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:03 PM
9

No to be the downer here, but as gay marriage is still a major issue where many/most gay people cannot even get married, I think it's a bit strange to be talking about gay divorce rates. We simply don't have the data.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 04:56 PM
2

The difference there is "creepy" in that context means "psycho". "creepy" in a guy context means "unwanted sexual advances"
/r/MensRights15/05/12 03:48 PM
2

I call women, particularly on reddit, "asshole" all the time. It's how you insult them directly without it being gendered. Then they can't play the "misogynist!" card to derail. They have to accept that I'm literally treating them just like a man. They aren't a bitch. They are an asshole.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 03:47 PM
3

That. Men will be called creeps but not sluts. Women will be called sluts but not creeps. This is all due to women being the gatekeepers of sex - the ones with the power. If she doesn't like the man's advances, he's a creep. Similarly women consider other women who "give it away" too freely to be sluts. It is important to remember here that most slut-shaming comes from women, not from men.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 03:46 PM
7

The belief that a very few men at the top nullifies the majority and legions of men at the very bottom - is known as "the apex fallacy" There's a reason every time feminists want to rail on about how men have it better - they pick presidents, actors, ceo's, and kings.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 02:04 PM
-9

College girls are idiots. That's why they need college.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 02:03 PM
44

ladies don't complain ROFLMAO
/r/MensRights14/05/12 08:22 PM
31

Decoded: Men can still be charged higher for auto-insurance. Men will be charged more for health insurance so that women can be charged less.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 07:24 PM
25

In before a feminist rage-posts about how women, no matter the counter-evidence, always have it harder.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 03:23 PM
4

Guess you didn't hear about that woman using okcupid to get free meals every night.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 09:11 PM
1

Womanists are black women who are, in a traditional communal sense, concerned very much with both black women and black men. What the fuck is the deal with making these names with woman/femini in the name then claiming they are for both? Call me skeptical, but I get the distinct feeling "womanism" doesn't actually do jack shit for black men at all.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 07:16 PM
7

The best part is the pause at the end when they try to make it about the 'wage gap' and scream "... but we only use that money, we don't earn it!" and they stop for a second while they have to reformulate their argument because they looked even worse there for a moment.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:19 PM
53

"Feminism is a movement for men too! We just don't want men around because they want their issues addressed."
/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:12 PM
6

I had a feeling I'd see the /r/shitredditsays cult in their post history.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:49 PM
94

How it works: All-Male is an "old boys club" and must be destroyed in the name of equality. All-Female is a "safe space" and must be protected in the name of equality.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:25 PM
2

You know that happens with other crimes too, right? Cops assuming somebody is guilty (often "they're black" -> "they're guilty") or a DA looking to win some big cases. Most of them are from forced confessions by really young guys. You're right and that's a great analogy. Men really are treated like a minority by the system, given substandard justice and used as a way to pander to the majority's lynch mobs.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:23 PM
5

It is insanely high. It's sort of amusing, in a darkly morose kind of way, all the innocent men that are being proven innocent using DNA evidence that wasn't available at the time of their convictions.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:06 PM
6

That is how it works though. She accuses, and unless he can prove himself innocent - he's fucked... or even if he can, he's still fucked in the court of opinion. ... and please recording sex is not instantly "making pornography" anymore than taking a 3 second clip on your iPhone is "making a blockbuster movie"
/r/MensRights11/05/12 03:44 PM
8

lol look at this tool. No sorry, but when you've got a "guilty unless proven innocent" situation pushed by feminists - then it's totally morally fine to take precautions to be able to prove innocence. ..especially when it has been shown women will lie about being raped and video evidence is one of the few ways of reliably proving innocence.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 03:19 PM
27

This is why you see the dominance in media of anti-male sexism, pro-woman propaganda, "dumb dad" advertising, and the endless escalation of bullshit consumerism to purchase utterly useless products.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:34 PM
2

Mundy isn’t the first to notice that women are outpacing men in educational attainment and, in some instances, earnings. Sort of like how if you shoot someone in the leg, you can outrun them.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:45 AM
37

It's actually a great book for being a warning to every dumbass who thinks they can invent utopia out of thin air.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 10:46 PM
14

It's possible things are different in the rl-sphere. However the whole "women live in constant fear of being raped" is sort of like me trying to say "I live in constant fear of a black guy robbing me". It's projection, bigotry, and a paranoia culture - not reason.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 07:20 PM
12

Nope. The only hassle at all was being constantly hit on and having to deflect it, and that was more just of it being a timewaster than anything else. It was pretty much the best of all worlds. Total freedom, allowed to do any role, given free stuff, plenty of attention. Sure there were a few assholes, but less assholes that you have to deal with than as a guy.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:48 PM
22

Yeah I've heard the "benevolent sexism" argument before. It's crap. It's the popular rich spoiled girl saying how hard her life is being rich and popular.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:29 PM
-3

That's because feminists have pushed for a nanny state.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:27 PM
30

Neither. I've done it. It was fucking amazing. I kept it purely online, but it was hilariously different. Women just have no idea how much better they have it. Call it transphobic if you like, but I'm not at all surprised that MtF is vastly more common than FtM.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:17 PM
6

More studies in transgendered issues. MtFs are much, much more common than FtMs. This article (and the earlier comment here about pretending to be a woman online) seems to be a strong clue why. MtFs seem drawn in by gender privilege while FtMs seem pushed away by losing it. Gay guys gain power by becoming FtMs, gay women have it easier by being butch instead of becoming MtFs. Err, could you re-read that? I think you reversed a few things, made some typos.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:01 PM
20

The same as from a child being told "when you can act like an adult, you will get treated like an adult"
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:59 PM
18

Well that "how it works" writes itself: He goes on "sex tourism" She goes on "romance vacations" If "How Stella Got Her Groove Back" was an older man picking up an underage girl - there would have been outrage and Whoopie would have been called a pedophile... but... Pussy Pass.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 05:57 PM
110

She was quickly reminded that in this arena, it's women who have the power, she said. How it works seems to be: Woman tries to be a guy - finds out guys are actually supportive and friendly with each other. Turns out women don't really want an overly sensitive guy and it's ridiculously demeaning to be a guy trying to talk to a strange woman. Guys try being women online - finds out it's amazingly awesome. Free gold, gear, attention, special treatment. Turns out you are handed everything on a plat…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 03:26 AM
3

SRS flips votes. -53 means +53
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:15 AM
9

Yeah don't link to SRS here, they are just clueless idiotic trolls with raging victim complexes - they desperately *NEED to be offended. SRS is what the world would be like if we have oppression olympics all day, every day. Post to ANTISRS instead, and just assume anything posted by an SRS member is because they are retarded.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:14 AM
2

This is why colleges need MRA organizations, so that someone is there to protest stereotyping sexist hate groups like the feminists at UCLA.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 08:45 PM
8

Just go over there, smile and go "Don't worry, I'd never hurt you - I'm your real father, no matter what she ever says!" Then look at the mother and say "if you are going to lie about me, I'm going to lie about me." Or, more realistically, just give the mother a death glare and then roll your eyes.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 08:43 PM
9

Clearly benevolent sexism!
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:11 PM
4

Just another example of feminism's invade and-take-over approach. The next step is they'll try to ban mra's entirely. They've done it with /r/anarchism, with /r/lgbt, now with /r/oney. They are trying it in plenty of other reddits too.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:02 PM
27

The first response is sensible. The response to that response is just ignorant, and "womanism"... please. The final response just shows them as incapable of seeing their own hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 04:30 PM
106

If you marry someone, remember not to cuckold them! If you have consensual sex with someone not your boyfriend, remember not to cry rape! If you get upset, remember not to abuse your husband! If you want child custody, remember not to lie about being abused!
/r/MensRights09/05/12 05:20 AM
7

How it works: If he's nice and she doesn't like him - he was only trying to get into her panties. If he's nice and she does like him - he's the sort of person worth having sex with.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:55 AM
-2

No, because the n-word is noteworthy for being the single ultimate bad word. When it comes to women/feminists though - there are entire post limits of unacceptable words. Every word it seems they can call offensive. The issue here is women who just want to be victims, who seek to be offended. They'll always find a way.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 12:12 AM
17

Yep, that's exactly how I felt when I first stumbled across this reddit. I always thought this line was perfectly fitting to someone a moment before stumbling across this reddit: "I know exactly what you mean. Let me tell you why you're here. You're here because you know something. What you know you can't explain. But you feel it. You've felt it your entire life. That there's something wrong with the world. You don't know what it is but it's there, like a splinter in your mind driving you mad. I…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 09:28 PM
6

You already see that with all the "where are all the men?" and "men are just video game playing boys now" type complaining articles. If a game is completely one-sided and unfair against you - you just don't play it or you weigh the risks/rewards and call it gambling. Men have looked at marriage and the playing-the-male-game and said "fuck this, the odds of winning blackjack and roulette are better, and the penalties for losing are astronomically higher" So many don't play unless they are suckere…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 09:24 PM
8

Yeah that's how it works - Feminism is somehow inclusive of everyone and a movement for men too, but is also a safe space for women away from men.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:03 PM
7

This comment from /r/feminism about it is telling, and really shows why mra's have categorically rejected feminism and call bullshit when they claim it is an equality movement for both genders: Anybody who comes into a subreddit named "Feminism" to talk about what they don't like about feminism and how it should be renamed to include men is going to get downvotes.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 05:50 PM
-1

Jeez are you still here pissing and moaning?
/r/MensRights08/05/12 04:57 PM
-1

How is talking about non-working men unrelated to the thread topic? .. and if I didn't say "all women", then go fuck yourself for acting like I did.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 01:35 AM
-3

Oh please. I never said "all women" We are talking about trends.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 01:21 AM
3

Let me repeat it since you seem to want to shift the goalposts: You asked: "Where is the pattern that one group is losing and the other gaining? " I posted: Here it is!
/r/MensRights08/05/12 12:36 AM
2

Even in heavily urbanized areas there is a far greater stigma against non-working child-reading men than there is against women. We've even pointed out the new "driving while black" is "male with child" when it comes to pedophilia hysteria.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 12:17 AM
5

Are you .. serious? Please at least fucking read the article before commenting in a thread about it. Here, I'll even highlight part of it for you
/r/MensRights08/05/12 12:09 AM
0

So... what reddit linked to this post here? I can tell from all the trolls and downvoting that somewhere did.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 11:53 PM
3

In short - because circumcision is a men's rights topic. Or as I tend to put it... "slicing up baby dicks then selling it to Oprah for women's face cream is definitely an MRA isue."
/r/MensRights07/05/12 10:22 PM
4

Where to begin? With how it relates to shifts in jobs? Women continue to gain while men continue to lose? How it relates to hiring quotas? How it relates to job discrimination, the supposed wage gap, the notion of the patriarchy and all that?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:59 PM
8

It should untrue, I agree. However in our current societal and legal system, it is true.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:55 PM
-1

I don't expect bigots to apologize. I fully expect you to keep rationalizing your anti-male attitude before continuing on to trolling. You're a cliche, a repeating pattern. There's not a unique aspect to any of this or you.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:02 PM
8

What you meant to say, I'm sure, is "Hi all, I don't post here much and don't understand how this relates to MR topics? Could you please explain?" What you said was just eye-roll worthy.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:43 PM
6

XY working is a responsibility, XX working is a choice.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:41 PM
-1

Nah, it's awesome how you came into a men's rights reddit telling men that their rights don't matter. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:58 PM
0

I keep feeling like this has to be a hoax. It's too good to be true.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:59 AM
5

You don't really see black people in the KKK. Yet you do see female mra's. At least the other posters there saw through that poster's bile.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:54 AM
2

That's because of places like SRS going to other places in reddit and trying to seed propaganda like "Oh /r/mensrights is just women hating misogynists who want the right to rape freely"
/r/MensRights07/05/12 01:22 AM
4

Major concerns: Divorce imbalance Child custody imbalance Prison imbalance Education imbalance Suicide imbalance Lifespan imbalance Societal imbalance ... and the major one - That men aren't even really allowed to discuss these issues or get momentum to solve them without being harshly criticized.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 01:21 AM
2

In fairness, all men are ultimate evil, worse than hitler and satan combined. Only through the power of positive holistic feminine energy can the world be saved from the patriarchal alien overlords that for some reason hate women, also freedom, also the american way of life.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 01:20 AM
3

Who cares what some idiot blogger says? They are just another ignorant hysterical dumbass.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 01:17 AM
2

if some1 even mentions /r/mensrights they get downvoted. SRS has massive presence/brigades in AskReddit.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:17 PM
7

I dont think you understood what the op was asking.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:42 PM
6

"All humans are equal, but some are more equal than others!"
/r/MensRights06/05/12 12:14 PM
22

How it works: Boy says self-affirming lyrics "I'm sexy and I know it" - SUSPENDED. Girl says sexist anti-male lyrics "Who rules the world? Girls rule!" - encouraged.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 12:13 PM
30

You're confused. It is only partially about him being able to "protect her" It is mostly about him showing dominance over other men. That's the real fucked up irony here. Dominance = status, and status is what she wants. It's simple. Women want men who control other men and women, then to control that man, so then by proxy they have status and power over everyone.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 09:52 AM
2

What I'm saying is.. was it really a man that was raped? Or was it someone born a woman who had not yet transitioned to male? Or was it someone born a man who was raped as a woman? It is an extremely minority case.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 07:33 AM
3

The thing is, you say XY but XY is a chromosomal designation, not a gender designation.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 07:02 AM
9

I am transgendered, pre-operative. I was closeted at the time of the rape. XY to XX rape. Sort of had to reach for that one, didn't you? So when you say "male".. Then comes the propaganda: The problem has gotten worse with some rather idiotic men poisoning the waters, trying to make what happened to me out to be an epidemic equal to the rape of XX women. and Be able to, when appropriate, discuss what happened to me and reduce my risk as much as possible of being lumped in with those who hijack t…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 06:42 AM
7

According to SRS all rape accusations by a male are false.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 06:06 AM
2

Interesting. It's a sponsored link yet right on target.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 04:58 AM
16

Yes, society does love to sell products by using fantasy.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 12:47 AM
-1

Most feminists are women.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 11:48 PM
13

Fucking Jezebel... Love how the very first comment is someone calling people that claim domestic violence liars. Men are clearly never abused, it's just them lying! Jezebel, the mainstream misandrist shithole half-blog .. This is the insanity we are facing as MRA's - feminist's response when absolute proof of female on male domestic violence is shown. No, we cannot treat them with the same measuring stick b/c men and women hold positions of vastly differing privilege and marginalization, which m…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 10:44 PM
29

Perhaps she's making a statement that in terms of perception, people think men have more rights than they do. That or she's an idiot.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 05:21 AM
14

Smart. That teacher is thinking about his job security in a profession utterly dominated by women, by talking about how his utter domination of boys under women is because of how boys are privileged, because men let women go first. Cognitive dissonance? How else do you think he got hired and survives in that profession!
/r/MensRights05/05/12 05:15 AM
7

Only very specific ones, not general birth control. That's a red herring. Regardless that was not goofy's argument.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:41 AM
2

I get it. You're sexist and think it's funny to make fun of men. Fuck off, bigot.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:58 AM
6

Yawn. When some fucker who has never posted in this reddit comes here waving the "look at the other person who is winning!"... I just roll my eyes. You are no MRA. You've never even posted here before. I'm just laughing at you trying to hide it, coward.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:52 AM
9

lol hi sockpuppet.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:38 AM
6

That's nice.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:26 AM
6

You're really really reaching now, to the point where it's best we drop this conversation.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:23 AM
5

Third, viagra is an aid to allow people to have sex. So is the pill. Third, viagra is an aid to allow people to have sex. So is porn. Third, viagra is an aid to allow people to have sex. So are sex toys. Third, viagra is an aid to allow people to have sex. So are prostitutes. Third, viagra is an aid to allow people to have sex. So are date rape drugs. Your argument is deeply DEEPLY flawed. Viagra treats a medical condition. Birth control does not. Saying both are aids for sex is utterly complete…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:20 AM
6

literally showing you the higher road rolleyes Save your smugness and projection. You aren't taking a high road, you're being condescending, patronizing, and obtuse.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:14 AM
6

It's cheaper to provide addicts with drugs too. How is it fair though? One is treatment for a medical condition, the other is a choice. The desire for birth control is not to treat a medical condition. Viagra is. How is it fair that men have to accept the responsibility if they have sex but women get choice - the right to abortions.. or to have him on the hook for child support? Men are constantly told "if you have sex, you accept the consequences" - why do women not have to? Furthermore, why sh…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:09 AM
5

Only if drug treatment, nicotine patches, vasectomies, paternity tests, prostrate cancer/checks/research, male birth control, cold medicine, chicken soup, ear piercings, dental work, and breast/penis enlargement are.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 03:06 AM
4

You're a woman, you're telling us to simply accept sexist jokes against men - is pretty fucked up. Please don't come here until you can respect the issues discussed.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 02:54 AM
8

lol thanks for concern trolling
/r/MensRights05/05/12 02:39 AM
6

Pointing out feminist hypocrisy does not hurt our movement.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 02:29 AM
5

It isn't really strawmanning, though. For example, this one: Falsely accusing a man of rape is a great way of raising his consciousness comes from: "Comins argues that men who are unjustly accused can sometimes gain from the experience. 'They have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration. 'How do I see women?' 'If I didn't violate her, could I have?' 'Do I have the potential to do to her what they sa…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 12:08 AM
6

It is pointing out the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 12:04 AM
3

Probably to A, clearly the system is designed to make sure they never fail. So if something goes wrong, I'm pretty sure A will get handheld out of the problems while B would have to fend for themselves.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 12:00 AM
2

zing
/r/MensRights04/05/12 11:59 PM
1

Upvote because: I was going to post it, but. I suspected someone else already had, so. I clicked and found it. Then I upvoted them instead.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 11:52 PM
1

Men have similar problems, not to do with appearance. No. Your claim is ludicrous, and I don't know why you keep pushing your sexist bias about that. You're just wrong about it. How can you possibly think men don't have similar problems with appearance? It's just so wrong I stagger to understand how you became so wrong.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 11:39 PM
15

Considering that women, for a long time, have been treated better the more attractive they are Why did you put "women" in that sentence instead of "people" It is the EXACT same situation for men. Men get better treatment if they are more attractive, do better in business, and are overall better received/perceived. There's nothing sexist in any of that. It is the exact same for both genders.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 01:26 PM
1

Fuck off troll provocateur.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 10:31 AM
-7

LMAO no.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 08:10 AM
36

Celda has a point. It is erroneous to assume the person holding the gun is male. It is not erroneous to assume a male is more likely to be shot.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 08:05 AM
2

That's because women control the vote and control the issues. MOST INEFFECTIVE PATRIARCHY EVER
/r/MensRights04/05/12 02:59 AM
19

It's ironic, really: People claim 2XC is mostly men. People claim OneY is mostly women.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 01:12 AM
2

The divorce industry has destroyed it. Divorce is just a symptom of institutional feminism's influence.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 01:01 AM
2

Anyone who can't see through the transparently political republican vs democrat propaganda of the term "war on women" is just completely clueless to the american "political process" and excessively vulnerable to hysteria.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 12:37 AM
2

They are taught, because all children have the tendency to hit unless you teach them not to. If you don't teach them not to, because many girls aren't - then they'll do it.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 12:27 AM
3

I've been increasingly coming to the belief that "feminism" means nothing without a qualifying word in front of it. "Institutional feminism" means something. "Radical feminism" means something. Feminism on it's own? It's like saying "stuff" or "things". It's meaningless.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 12:23 AM
4

SRS is /r/shitredditsays. Imagine the most over the top "politically correct" judgmental hypocrites gone wild you can think of, then turn that up to 11, add in rampant banning and hysterical psychosis - and that's SRS. They have a habit of coming here to attack us. They quite literally interfere with men fighting for their rights - and fight against us on issues like this one.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 12:17 AM
7

I forget the fallacy name for that. It's the same as "it's common knowledge that heavier things fall faster" and "it's common knowledge the world is flat"
/r/MensRights04/05/12 12:11 AM
8

Hrmm... a real world example of reddit attacking rape culture? Eat that, SRS. You didn't do shit to help and you fight against us.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:51 PM
2

The Patriarchy isn't real, but that doesn't stop feminists from ranting hysterically and loudly about it either.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:38 PM
4

Yeah I'm not denying there's rampant anti-male sexism. I'm just saying it's possible she in particular is an asshole.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:32 AM
3

Sure, and it quite likely was sexism. However it's also possible she's just an asshole (note how I say that instead of "bitch") who would have been just as pissy towards her daughter playing with a woman too.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 03:32 AM
6

It's possible she was just an asshole.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:37 AM
2

This is not what I subscribe to /r/MensRights/ for. I come here to educate and inform myself. Not for rhetoric and antagonism. JFC nobody made you read the article.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:34 AM
5

You should work in a movie theatre... ...you really have a knack for projecting a lot.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 02:32 AM
11

thinking that violence against men empowers women Yep, that's exactly how they rationalize and justify it.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 08:13 PM
2

Yep. That's concern troll behavior alright. Never posted here before yesterday - but suddenly an "expert" Accuses us of misogyny. Uses strawmen. Openly insults when told to stop concern trolling and projecting.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:59 PM
3

Well, see for yourself. Look over their post history. They are playing the "I'm a real MRA and you are all misogynists" card. Note also they didn't even post to /r/mensrights before yesterday, yet suddenly are an expert?
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:51 PM
0

fyi, leprendun is a concern troll
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:49 PM
3

After reading more of his posts and looking through his post history - I'm actually quite certain he is concern trolling on purpose.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:46 PM
2

Alright, then I'm going to consider it my duty here to out that you are openly misrepresenting /r/mensrights in an organized concern troll.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:42 PM
3

I think both ideas are worthy goals, but we can do it without labeling all women (even all feminists) as "evil bitches"- You need to stop concern trolling with that line. You are continually, repeatedly - posting as if we label all women as evil bitches. We don't and you need to stop with that misrepresentation.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:27 PM
8

I think leprendun, even if not aware of it - is concern trolling and projecting. Sure there's dislike of feminists here, but it's because they are feminists not because they are women. It's the same as how we like girlwriteswhat, a female mra... but we tend not to like male feminists.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 07:26 PM
2

Understandable. Work and real life come first and it's easy for these discussions to eat up massive amount of time. Thanks for the discussion and good luck with your workload.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 11:02 AM
16

Original: "A lot of people are very upset by it, but I think if a man was secure he wasn't a rapist, he wouldn't be threatened by this list," Ms. Lane said" Re-gendered: "A lot of people are very upset by it, but I think if a woman was secure she wasn't a pedophile, she wouldn't be threatened by this list," Mr. Lane said" Re-raced: "A lot of people are very upset by it, but I think if a black person was secure they weren't a crack dealer, they wouldn't be threatened by this list," Ms. Lane, a wh…
/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:16 AM
5

I have a counter proposal that we use these two: Institutional feminism - The current mainstream women's lobbying organization that also controls education. Radical feminism - The "cut their dicks off" male-hating marxist feminism.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 04:40 PM
2

You have to understand that political correctness is really code for never saying anything interesting ever.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 05:23 AM
29

tl;dr Shit nobody says. Shit nobody says. Shit nobody says. Shit nobody says. Hysterically blatant strawman.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 05:11 AM
16

Feminism as it has been mapped out - is hostile territory to men. Every point on the feminism map is designed to be anti-male yet beyond criticism. First they'll say that feminism is about equal rights. If you try to bring up equality for men though - they'll first claim to support it, then do nothing. If you try to get something done - they'll tell you to be quiet and not do a "whataboutthemenz". If you somehow finally manage to get them to admit if they are about equal rights then equality mus…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:51 AM
5

Three topics here - projecting, hypocrisy, and context. I'll address each in turn. Projecting : You are projecting because you are ascribing your own opinions onto me. For one I had not criticized Mitchellonfire. You assumed, you -projected- that I was. You did it a second time by assuming that because I commented here that I had a problem with the comments. That's okay (because I do), but because they were not appropriate to that context. I'll address that when we get to context. Hypocrisy - th…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:03 AM
47

Frankly I increasingly don't think the term 'feminist' actually means anything. Everytime you criticize it, you are told "It's too large to define. You can't generalize." However if you don't embrace it, you are an entire encyclopedia's worth of evil.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 08:58 PM
9

So you were just a troll and a liar. Got it.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 07:21 PM
0

Again you are projecting. Ignorant implies uninformed, uneducated. Quite the contrary - I was a feminist for years. I'm intimately familiar with feminism. You see there's the public front feminism uses, the claims, the propaganda - and then there's what feminism actually does, the doublethink, and the cognitive dissonance. You are free of course to say I'm stereotyping. You are free to say I'm wrong - but ignorant is the wrong term.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 07:01 PM
10

So you were just a troll and a liar. Got it.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:45 PM
14

We don't want people advocating rape here. We don't want drama queens going "That's it! I'm going home!" who then don't. Just fuck off and go away already. You said you were leaving. So leave.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:21 PM
14

Okay. GTFO then. Stop posting and just leave.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:13 PM
18

Get the fuck out, asshole. No means no.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 05:48 PM
5

You (and feminists) seem to have this notion that we are just dying to hear a feminist's opinion here, as if we didn't have plenty coming here to shout it.. that we are somehow motivated to get more feminists here, as if we really wanted more feminists around. We aren't. We don't. The thing we really don't care to have more of - is feminists coming here to tell us what to do. We don't want more feminists who think they are going to "school those mra's" Come here as a feminist looking for insight…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 05:46 PM
0

You are projecting quite a bit here. At what point did I criticize them?
/r/MensRights30/04/12 05:26 PM
3

PUA's / PUA bloggers advocating unprotected sex. What? Going to need some citations/references for that, because it makes no objective sense. It's exactly like saying "yeah, you know I advocate getting AIDS. "
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:16 PM
24

Wow, it's like a living breathing example of "feminism is only about equality when it helps women"
/r/MensRights30/04/12 12:11 PM
12

Funny, because I feel exactly about feminism as Mitchellonfire claims to about us. I was one for years, then wised up when I realized they systematically hate men and could no longer handle the cognitive dissonance when they claimed not to yet in every instance would move against men.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 11:22 PM
6

It's interesting because it seems to imply with 'reclaim feminism' that the previous stereotypes were true: i.e. That feminists are lesbians That feminists don't wear makeup That feminists are somewhat anti-sex That feminists hate men and work against men's rights So the poster maker seems to be saying that they aren't just stereotypes, that to reclaim feminism (i.e. created post-post-post-feminism or whatever) - that feminists should be embraced for being sexual, feminine, pro-sex, and pro-men'…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 09:50 PM
-1

I bet in your head you think that was awesome. .. and I don't want to shatter your adorable little dreams. So I'm going to make this post. You make one more post... and really try now! Really make something special in reply to it so you can feel validated! Go on now! Do your best! I BELIEVE IN YOU.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:51 AM
0

Awwwwww :) You keep on trying lil trooper! Don't ever let anyone tell you that you can't!
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:47 AM
2

/pat You're cute.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:44 AM
0

Yawn. Didn't you already admit you weren't a sociologist or psychologist? Sorry, didn't mean to add to your growing stack of hypocrisy or anything... Don't worry though. I'll be around to out you for what you are from now on.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:40 AM
-1

Yawn. Just fuck off next time and I won't have to out you as a hypocritical concern troll. Seriously. It's not hard. Even you could probably just fuck off. Hey, at least you admitted you were wrong. That is something. Of course now you are still trying to act like I was wrong - which is wanky and still just being a douchebag hypocritical concern troll... but hey... I don't expect you to learn to fuck off right away.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:37 AM
-1

Wow, your post was the worst "Yeah you got me dead to rights. There's no possible way to spin it now. So yeah, I'm a hypocritical concern troll" admission ever. Next time just fuck off, shithole. I don't have time for concern trolls and I'm going to be a complete asshole to you on principle for doing it.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:34 AM
0

My favorite part of your hypocrisy was when you said: " We're not angry with women" Yes, the staggering majority of subscribers to this subreddit are. I suppose you'll present a survey, petition or census that was performed on this subreddit right? Right! Sure you will.. SURE. Lol. You're so bad at this. So easily outed as a concern troll. So easily shown to be a hypocrite. Run along now. Run on home.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:26 AM
15

Fair enough, but this was in the context of privileges Why is there a women's day but not a men's day... "because every day is men's day" Why is there a women's center but not a men's center... "because everywhere else is a men's center." Why is there a women's reserved hour at the gym but not a men's reserved hour... "because every other time is a men's hour" Why is there a lady's night at the bar but not a men's night... "because every other night is men's right" It is used to ignore special p…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:21 AM
2

Fuck off concern troll - imgur You're just upset I outed you for the anti-MRA you are.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:14 AM
2

Fuck off concern troll - imgur
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:11 AM
2

Awww... Look it's a concern troll doing the cliche whining and bitching when they demanded an example and got it. Booooooooooooring.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:06 AM
1

Not going to lie. Didn't read that. You lost. Have some dignity.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 10:01 AM
7

Sorry, but I demonstrated. Glarfugus said "demonstrably false in every facet" - and I proved them wrong, that it is NOT demonstrably false in EVERY facet. So... You lose. No shifting the goalposts! Have a nice night!
/r/MensRights29/04/12 09:53 AM
9

Demonstrated
/r/MensRights29/04/12 09:48 AM
11

Fuck off concern troll - imgur don't be mad, outing anti-MRA trolls is what I do It's simple - instead of asking feminists, who aren't going to self-report the truth. Look at what they do
/r/MensRights29/04/12 09:42 AM
1

They are going to try to get you banned. It's that simple. You don't need to be dealing with her on it. You need to talk to the administration about it directly. She'll misrepresent you. You need the "equal opportunity for sanctioned groups" protection from the administration. Also, if you go to their meeting they are going to try to bully and shame you.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:47 AM
15

Sorry but it is demonstrably true. Is it true for every single feminist? Perhaps not. Yet it is true for the dominant majority.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 06:59 AM
2

Wikipedia is generally feminist controlled. Even the article on misandry has a feminist spin.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 10:08 PM
6

Not me. I am a billionaire with an IQ of 204, a 14.1 inch penis, and I'm posting from my batmobile.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 09:36 AM
5

You aren't going to hear the truth from feminists by asking them. You have to observe what they actually do.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 09:04 AM
2

Same crap as always - women are about half of the DV abusers but the article is all "women who suffered"
/r/MensRights27/04/12 07:07 PM
0

/pat
/r/MensRights27/04/12 05:31 PM
0

Yep. Once a concern troll is outed, they resort to just trolling. We have had previous discussions though, on the account you are using right now even too. Just fuck off now. You are no MRA. You're just another troll and your desperate grabs to try to deny it are just sad.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 05:27 PM
0

Don't feel bad. I'm great at spotting concern trolls. Mainly it's because I can speed-read people's post histories, compare that to how old their account is, and then remember the context of conversations I've had with them before. You're outed.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 05:16 PM
0

No you aren't. You're full of shit and a concern troll.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 04:58 PM
1

lol throw out more buzzwords then go back to /r/shitredditsays or /r/feminisms
/r/MensRights27/04/12 04:41 PM
1

The rhetoric was meant to illustrate a point you so lovingly brushed right over and right into more assumptions. Perhaps you are confusing an example with rhetoric. Also really? you think the media doesn't target white creepy looking men? .. okay.. rolls eyes You can't just say "oh it isn't the media's fault, because the media just reflects what they've gathered from the media!" Somebody in that process, actually EVERYONE in that process is inserting their own bias and framing in each link in th…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 04:19 PM
1

So who is to blame for the framing a report of news gathered from the media which is framing a report of news gathered from the media which is framing a report of news gathered from the media which is framing a report of news gathered from the media which is framing a report of news gathered from the media which is framing a report of news gathered from the media which is framing a report of news gathered from the media which is framing a report of news gathered from the media which is framing a…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 01:30 PM
6

How it works: If a couple drink and have sex, he's a rapist. DISAGREEING IS RAPE CULTURE!!!!!! Systemic outright threatening of men with rape. Men are privileged?
/r/MensRights27/04/12 11:18 AM
3

Uhm... First you said "Not really mainstream media's fault. " Then you said "Or in some cases some popular TV shows like criminal minds or law and order SVU where this is a common theme" Just how do you define mainstream media?
/r/MensRights27/04/12 12:47 AM
7

Section 11's executive director, Ed Cinelli, told MyFoxNY, "As a sport, it's a girls sport. " The "how it works" for that one writes itself.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 05:26 PM
2

The fuck? I said right off it had nothing to do with PUA - you just kept trying to turn it that direction, because of your own mental crusade against it.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 04:01 PM
2

Now who is angry and biased? I already said I didn't really agree with PUA. Yet you decided to go off on some rant about PUA itself. I said to look at the root causes behind why it grew - to look at the dating game itself... and you just spammed some more crap about PUA itself. Get the fuck over it. This isn't about PUA. Whatever stick you have up your ass about PUA isn't really relevant here. It's about the dynamics of dating in modern times. That's the real topic here.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 03:49 PM
2

Still waiting for you to get out of here... to be done. Get the fuck out? We don't want you here? Leave?
/r/MensRights26/04/12 03:33 PM
3

Oh please. You come at me with "You are angry and biased" then play the "you're negging me!" card? Get the fuck out of here. You were never interested in a real discussion. You even ignored the on-topic points I'd just made in order to go all crybaby. Run along little man.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 03:30 PM
2

Yawn. "Tone arguments" are wanky. I'm not angry - I'm dismissive! Learn the difference. PUA, while not something I really agree with - is a response to the opposite side of the game. It is a reaction to the already existing oppressive and damaging game played from the opposite side to PUA's. PUA's are simply trying to be competitive in that new game. If you want to actually do something about it - address why PUA's arose in the first place. Address why and how the game changed in the first place…
/r/MensRights26/04/12 03:16 PM
0

Illiterate dumbfuck
/r/MensRights26/04/12 03:12 PM
0

Illiterate dumbfuck
/r/MensRights26/04/12 02:35 PM
0

Illiterate dumbfuck
/r/MensRights26/04/12 02:08 PM
3

You're absolutely right. They aren't exactly the same.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:27 PM
0

Illiterate dumbfuck
/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:26 PM
2

Oh. I sort of ignored the first half of that, it reeked of feminist hysteria whether you meant it to or not. So I focused on the second half "turning dating into a zero-sum and very self-destructive game." which seemed to imply it was not already a zero-sum and very self-destructive game.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 04:45 AM
2

Who said anything about PUA?
/r/MensRights26/04/12 04:27 AM
9

It's a dick move, like saying "hey man, maybe it was partly your fault you were mugged when you went to the inner city at night then started slapping street kids with your fat wallet and calling them lazy <expletives>"
/r/MensRights26/04/12 04:23 AM
0

Illiterate dumbfuck.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 04:15 AM
4

Between now and when men weren't supposed to know the games women play.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 04:10 AM
1

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee…
/r/MensRights26/04/12 04:09 AM
0

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee…
/r/MensRights26/04/12 04:04 AM
0

lol desperation. it's cute
/r/MensRights26/04/12 03:50 AM
1

Ahm... the only difference is now men aren't such easy targets.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 02:37 AM
-2

Half-illiterate dumbfuck troll. You lack reading comprehension and memory of your own posts. I don't really care what inventions an idiot like you tries to fling out to deflect from your dumbassery.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 11:07 PM
-2

Half-illiterate dumbfuck
/r/MensRights25/04/12 10:40 PM
-1

I don't have to answer how. You said it yourself that you were. How fucking stupid are you?
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:57 PM
2

Oh good fucking lord. Still on with this shit? There's no proof a pink pony didn't ride in singing 'Showtunes' - but THERE'S NO FUCKING EVIDENCE ONE DID EITHER and there's A FUCKTON OF EVIDENCE IT DIDN'T.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:40 PM
1

Also, I'd still like to hear your opinion on my bias. This will be the third time you've refused to respond to my question, an action I would expect only from a coward. If you refuse to respond again, I'm going to have no option but to assume that you are one. I already responded to that. Your utter lack of reading comprehension is turning you into a ranting idiot. Scroll back you dumb fuck. Honestly, I think this most likely true. BUT WE DON'T FUCKING KNOW. Look. I gave FOUR examples to show it…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:22 PM
1

Jesus fucking christ on a stick. HERE ARE THE FUCKING QUOTES. Learn to fucking read goddamnit. “I don’t think it’s the intention of men (to cause discomfort),” Russell said. “Just because it’s male-dominated, it (the rec) becomes more intimidating.” "Female students were quick to respond to criticism of their designated weight-room hour, with nearly a dozen voicing concerns about the intimidation of working out in a room full of adult males." "“I wasn’t even that out of shape, but I shriveled at…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:03 PM
2

Alright, if some guy harasses them, ban him from the gym. Punish the individuals responsible, not the entire gender. This part I agree with. What I don't agree with is how the women IF YOU READ THE FULL FUCKING ACTUAL ARTICLE AND NOT JUST THE FIRST THREE PARAGRAPHS - is that they are using the claim of harassment to cover for their own body-issues.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:49 PM
3

It never said they were harassed. It was very specifically vague that it was just a feeling - that they were "A number of students came to her before the creation of the female-exclusive period to voice their concerns about feeling intimidated and harassed by the larger male population." Your bias, if you'd just read the goddamn link, is that you were already anti-mra before coming here.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:28 PM
4

It is clear to me you can't read. You didn't read the whole article where they show that it's not about harassment - it's about their body consciousness. Then you didn't read the link I provided either or it would be brutally obvious how you are biased. So fuck off or learn to read.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:20 PM
2

Hey, you're the fuckface who came in here throwing out "For fucks sakes you stupid twits." in your first line. You're just another asshole troll. Don't pretend to be anything but that.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:19 PM
1

Did you read the article? Oh nevermind. Your bias is bleeding out
/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:09 PM
2

lol umad?
/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:02 PM
1

They aren't really being harassed though - that's just the leverage they are using to get special-privilege time.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 06:39 PM
9

Look at it in this light if you want to see the truth of the situation: "We got a lot of feedback from white people that they feel intimidated in those spaces by black people, and so they chose not to work out in there. We’re hearing that a lot of people are changing their work and school schedules (around) that time period." ... "I wasn’t even that out of shape, but I shriveled at the thought of black people watching me work out and judging my level of fitness. The (white people’s) hour is esse…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:54 PM
3

"cannot "be themselves""... well there goes the entire makeup, fashion, hair care, and other industries.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 11:44 AM
2

You created an account just to post that? Fail.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 11:43 AM
2

I actually think I'd have enjoyed a movie with her and the whole backstory/etc. I think a lot of guys would too. Most movies with women as the lead though don't seem to do well. Also I'd be concerned that feminists would have severely criticized it for being too sexy (ironically).
/r/MensRights25/04/12 10:08 AM
2

I'm saying it doesn't follow the comics. The avengers were never at any point an all-male team. As far as I can tell they always had at least 2 if not more women.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 10:00 AM
1

That's just shoddy implementation though. It could have been done much better, no doubt. I'm just pointing out that an all-male avengers team would be strange.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 09:56 AM
5

Whedon is technically accurate, and right. The avengers had a LOT of women - scarlet witch, the wasp, moondragon, mantis, hellcat, ms. marvel, tigra, she-hulk, mockingbird, firebird, invisible woman, sersi, crystal, spider-woman, firestar... It was not (and never was) an all-male team. Besides come on - I'm bi but I know a lot of you are straight guys. Don't you want some women in there?
/r/MensRights25/04/12 09:50 AM
5

Come on now. We all know the different between flirting and being offensive. It's simple. Be handsome, fit, and rich. Don't be not handsome, not fit, or not rich. You could be genuine and show that you are a caring individual. Connect with her on a sincere emotional level. Treat her like an equal and appeal to her intelligent side with intellectual conversion that shows you respect her as a person. Wait. Full stop. You failed. See you were only doing it to manipulate her and get sex. You asshole…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 09:09 AM
13

It's going to sound cliche, but every day you are alive and with a roof over your head puts you ahead of billions of other people. I'm not saying that to dismiss your troubles... only to remind you that with life comes hope.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:55 AM
15

So should you get a special hour at the gym's prime time too?
/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:03 AM
59

It's telling that the way women pushed for and got this was by saying they were "feeling intimidated and harassed by the larger male population." then when you look at why it's "I wasn’t even that out of shape, but I shriveled at the thought of people watching me work out and judging my level of fitness." In other words... Woman feels body-conscious = lies about harassment/intimidation in order to use equipment alone. Nevermind all the GUYS who feel self-conscious too.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 06:54 AM
7

Damn. I forgot to include that part. We almost certainly will.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:19 AM
43

... and the backpedaling begins. That's how feminists do things. First come at you with smiles, then attack attack attack. If you fight back - attack HARDER. Then if they see themselves starting to lose - then it's smiles and shifting the blame.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 12:53 AM
2

You are out of your depth here. First you don't know qwestion's history like I do. Two I know you've posted to SRS. Three their "demanding to know when they were trolling" was just more trolling. ... and finally their comment and account is deleted. You'll see them again though. That's qwestion's pattern - delete their account constantly and create a new one.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 05:07 PM
1

Yawn... and now you are meta-trolling. Go back to playing the "I'm suicidal with ptsd and need special hand-holding while I go trolling other reddits" card. You had better luck with that.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 04:13 PM
1

What's going to be awesome is in a few months when some kid has to stand before a college tribunal falsely accused of rape... and neither he nor the tribunal will know it's the same "unnamed woman"
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:48 PM
1

You know qwestions, if you are going to keep playing the "oh woe is me I'm suicidal" victim-card.. you really shouldn't be going to other reddits trolling. I realize you are just another SRS troll, but it's really particularly hypocritical of you to.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 03:20 PM
5

I'm saying that nebulousness is taken advantage of - as people tend to do. Sure, sometimes it's not blatant manipulation.. but sometimes it's subtle manipulation. Sometimes it's entitlement.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 11:12 AM
6

NOW is known as just a women's lobbying organization. NOW claiming to be feminist is just propaganda - political maneuvering.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 10:26 AM
1

That's because of the same reason that when female teachers rape their students, they get a wrist-slap "for being in love" It isn't that women don't do it - it's that women get away with it.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 09:37 AM
69

Feminism is in decline for a few reasons: It's no longer new or alternative - it's mainstream, no longer cool and edgy. It has become the system - not something that fights it. It works against equality - it's a women's lobbying organization not an egalitarian movement. It's restrictive - like a religion, it offers shame and constricted dogma, not freedom. It's not really sexy - men prefer easy-going happy sexy girls to nitpicking "sex positive activists" It's divided in two - is it angry milita…
/r/MensRights24/04/12 09:23 AM
23

Awesome topic. It needs to be shown that it doesn't matter if the man is strong (Deion Sanders being a clear example). It needs to be shown that because of the one-sided laws a strong man is just as vulnerable if not more to domestic violence - because he can't fight back.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 08:48 AM
8

armamr, -23 comment karma, 16 days old Fuck off SRS slime.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 07:54 AM
2

hahahaha lol fuck off SRS shithead
/r/MensRights24/04/12 02:21 AM
3

I see you don't like your own logic turned back at you. Stop being a hypocrite - realize that "more men go to college than ever" can still be unfair to men. OH. No wonder you're a bigoted shithead - you're from SRS.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 02:05 AM
3

By your logic - women are more likely to have jobs than ever in the past - so why are we still giving them special treatment? Make more money than ever in the past - so why care about a wage gap? Less likely to be raped - so why make it easier to find innocents guilty? You're clearly and obviously ignoring the relative and being hypocritical - basing your arguments on it always favoring women.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 02:00 AM
3

Your argument breaks down when you realize college is the key to higher employment.. and women both outnumber men in college but get more support/scholarships... and then those women get the higher paying jobs. How it works: When men outnumber women somewhere women want - then there needs to be "equality" When women outnumber men somewhere men want - then "it's not a zero sum game"
/r/MensRights24/04/12 01:31 AM
16

That's just feminist thought patterns. Equality means women always gain greater than or equal to men. If they gain greater, it shows how women are superior to men.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 06:01 AM
3

Mr W said he now suspected it may have been Miss N’s plan all along to have a child with a wealthy man from whom she could claim child support over the next 18 years ... At least he learned from the experience... I guess.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 10:04 PM
12

The study was vested in the outcome. So they counted as rape many people who didn't feel they had been raped. Have you ever been touched by a woman without giving permission? Congratulations you've been sexually victimized. Have you ever had sex after drinking or drugs? Congratulations, you've been sexually victimized. Have you ever felt any pressure either personally or socially to have sex? Congratulations, you've been sexually victimized. ... and by the feminist transitive property of "sexual…
/r/MensRights22/04/12 09:58 PM
6

I thoroughly debunked this feminist nonsense before: when it was this link They put This minifig as an example of sexism. However that minifig is part of the current series 6 ( preview it here) of which ALSO include these two: Skater girl - “Who cares what anybody thinks? I skate for me!” Lady liberty - "Lady Liberty protects against oppression of all kinds." Do they show those? No, because it doesn't fit their drummed up false narrative. Well that's okay, maybe the previous two series were wors…
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:52 AM
8

lawl
/r/MensRights22/04/12 06:56 AM
14

Evidently you do because SRS and trolls have to run these disinformation campaigns. Clearly SRS is afraid of the truth, but reddit already knew that.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 05:58 AM
10

Oh. Both trolling and stupid.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 01:59 AM
7

Did you actually read those links?
/r/MensRights22/04/12 01:04 AM
13

Not sure if trolling or stupid.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 11:38 PM
2

I pointed out that phenomena here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/rwjcv/the_this_has_nothing_to_do_with_mens_rights/ For some reason it's almost always people who don''t post here much.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 06:53 AM
1

You tell me. Should you date someone that doesn't think you should have rights? That said, don't ever discuss the following on a first date: money, sex, religion, politics, gender.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 11:48 PM
2

Wow you don't get more blatantly "false equivalency" than that.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 07:22 AM
6

If you read the article - it makes it clear why false claims of rape (not just false accusations) are just as bad as false accusations.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 07:14 AM
4

Why not just do what women do here - find out how the percentage of men who have had sex then count them as having been raped.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 02:28 AM
2

You're not the brightest bulb in the blown-out bulb store are you?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 01:50 AM
4

Most people can read. Learn to.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 01:46 AM
4

This comment is kind of brilliant: We over corrected for whatever male bias we had, treating women as if they are truly minorities, ignoring the ways that they are not like racial minorities (that is, they aren't actually numerically inferior, don't suffer from generational discrimination, aren't seen as inherently unattractive by non women, etc).
/r/MensRights19/04/12 01:34 AM
3

Your reading comprehension is terrible. I already explained I supported outing what they were doing but not outing the people themselves. Nothing changed. You are just not really reading.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 08:07 PM
7

Bull crap FUCKING READ THIS - it can't state more plainly that I was against the doxxing. I was for showing what those quite literally anti-male misandrist feminists were doing but NOT giving out their private information. Read the links, it's all there for anyone with basic reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 06:39 PM
5

Link to the thread please. I know it's SRS M.O. to quote out of context. However I was very clearly opposed to releasing private information and EXTREMELY opposed to violence. Here's the links you are trying to hide: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/nleln/agent_orange_files_released/c3a0jaw http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/nleln/agent_orange_files_released/c3a1hen http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/nleln/agent_orange_files_released/c3a2ebo http://www.reddit.com/r/M…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 05:59 PM
7

The doxxing stuff is what we didn't allow. There were still threads discussing the issue itself.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 05:56 PM
10

After all the blackvisions stuff I wanted to make sure it wasn't just another SRS op somehow that it was sent to me - but I decided best to just release it and let people draw their own conclusions.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 05:54 PM
9

No. That's completely backwards horseshit. If you can find links from that fiasco you'll see I was (and am) very opposed to giving out private info like that.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 05:30 PM
5

Perhaps. I remember speaking out against the agentorange thing and being downvoted and flamed to hell by people I'd never heard of here - all claiming to be "real mra's. It's the only time I've seen /r/mensrights respond that way to my posts - and to this day I think it was really another group here in force, trying to make it seem like we supported it.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:28 AM
9

Yes, but you can't really be certain that it wasn't just a pretense - or that HP wasn't in on it. It wasn't like all of SRS knew about the eschatology trolls beforehand either.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:20 AM
15

Does it? They are already running double-sided campaigns. It's really impossible to say when they are pretending and when they actually are.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:15 AM
33

Yep, evidently the whole thing was at their urging using insider connections - then spun. It was just another SRS op from the start. I've been warned about littletiger's duplicity before - not to trust the ingratiating innocent face they put on. It gets even more interesting with the implication that SRS was behind the agentorange doxxing stuff too (that they made it look like we were going to release private info). If that's true, then they set up a situation to frame us, then contacted the SPL…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:03 AM
16

I went ahead and added imgur links to them.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 07:46 AM
91

I was sent this anonymously and had been keeping it just as a message, but perhaps now is the time to release it: http://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/comments/nfirb/rmensrights_annouces_their_plan_to_release_the/c38q2qu/ : imgur link http://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/comments/qo05r/meta_in_recognition_of_rmensrights_being_declared/c3z2uhu : imgur link http://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/comments/qo05r/meta_in_recognition_of_rmensrights_being_declared/c3z2tmf : imgur link If the links …
/r/MensRights18/04/12 07:01 AM
1

Sure kid. Whatever helps your denial.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 06:56 AM
1

No worries. Good discussion.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:57 PM
1

Ah I see. An issue with different definitions then. I'm using the wikipedia version which is "A sucker bet is a term used to describe a gambling wager in which your expected return is significantly lower than your wager(s)" In other words, the price for losing vs the benefits of "winning"
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:42 PM
1

Marriage becomes less of a sucker bet (though not necessarily less dangerous if you do get caught in a bad one, as you point out) if the divorce rate is actually less. I'm curious what rate you consider not a sucker's bet? Russian Roulette is generally played with a six-shooter. There's only a 1 in 6 chance of "losing" on each pull - vastly better odds than even a 25% divorce rate. Yet most people would consider that an unwise game to play. Considering the penalties and life-destroying that divo…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:21 PM
1

you might as well just resort to trolling now, it's all you've got left. I see you took it to heart.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:17 PM
1

No look again at what you referenced where it says ", the United States government began reporting the divorced rate based on the number of divorces per 1000 members of the US population" - that's not talking about the number of marriages that end in divorce. It is talking about the number of divorces out of 1000 people. There is no value there to include the number of marriages, so it's the divorced rate not the divorce rate. To calculate the divorce rate you would need data that gave the numbe…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:07 PM
1

It has been pointed out that divorce rate is highly tied to education and wealth. So for many people they look around and see a rate higher than 50% - a lot of their friends & family getting divorced. For other people they look around and see a rate much lower than 50% - and think most people don't get divorced. Google isn't much help here as there's conflicting opinions and data. One can find enough sources to argue their case either way. Anecdotal evidence can vary widely yet be true, dependin…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:53 PM
1

The problem with that is that most of those divorces are not those marriages. Those divorces are from marriages from last year, or five years ago, or ten, or twenty-five. And the marriage rate might have been very different then. You're comparing apples to oranges. No. If we are talking about the divorce rate - it is entirely and precisely accurate. 50% is the rough rate even if it won't remain the same. Largely because fewer people are getting married in the first place, but it is completely fa…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:35 PM
10

Agreed. /r/LGBT is an SRS-controlled anti-male feminist reddit run by mods the gay community hates. Use /r/ainbow - /r/LGBT is a grim parody of what LGBT is about.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:01 PM
1

Look, I realize you are an anti-MRA and a troll, but try to have some basic logic. The number of people who are or have been divorced is not the same data as the rate of divorce. People can be divorced multiple times - the percentage of divorced people is always going to be lower than the divorce rate. Many people never marry, and so don't really factor into the divorce rate, although they do skew the numbers in terms of total percentage of population who divorce but AGAIN that is NOT the percen…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 09:44 PM
1

1) The divorce rate is NOT 50%. It's much much lower. That link is confusing the divorced rate from the divorce rate.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:54 PM
1

Ironically, feminists also condition young girls to think that if he wants to marry you, he only wants to use you - because "marriage is slavery"
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:52 PM
43

How it works: If it's women only - it's a "safe space" If it's men only - it's a "sexist boy's club"
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:21 PM
2

MRAs out on the street? We are lucky to even talk here on the internet without a thousand feminists and hysterical "omg u want women in the kitchen" trolls descending.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:54 PM
5

I don't exactly see feminists exactly out on the streets protesting that they aren't drafted.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:27 PM
1

I doubt it. "completely student-run" generally means under guidance of a school official, using school property. true "completely student run" tends to get banned.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:34 AM
7

Yes, let's export genital mutilation. That seems intelligent.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:31 AM
2

So really, I see that if you really trust and love the person if it makes them happy marry them. That was the exact part I was going to quote. Nearly everyone thinks they love and trust the person, yet 50% of them get divorced. Loving and trusting them - of course, you shouldn't get married if you don't.. but it sure as HELL isn't going to save you. Things change.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:16 AM
3

Saying there's nothing wrong with marriage is like saying flying is absolutely harmless. It's true - because landing is the dangerous part and divorce is the dangerous part.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 06:15 AM
3

Violence is amusing, sorry but it is. That sort of transcends gender in the same way that violently blowing up a brick building is amusing. The issue is that if it is gendered violence, then it becomes spiteful - and that's different. That said, people in college are still children in many ways - overall it's probably better to be understanding. She's learning, you are learning, it gets a lot more complicated as you go through college, graduate, then enter the real world... and then gets even mo…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:52 AM
14

You bastard! How dare you use capslock without a trigger warning for people who are sensitive to shouting!
/r/MensRights16/04/12 08:54 PM
4

Conflicted: In one sense, she was growing drugs in her house, stealing electricity, EVERYBODY is under financial pressure, nearly stole the plotline of "Weeds" - and ultimately got a slap on the wrist simply for being fail at it. On the other hand, this is weed we are talking about, the only drug that's dangerous precisely because it's so harmless. Perhaps there is a double-standard, but I just don't find myself upset at someone getting a slap on the wrist for it.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 08:01 PM
8

The men got to die a quick death while women were left alone and impoverished. This is the mentality we are dealing with when it comes to feminists. The poor alone, impoverished ALIVE women...
/r/MensRights16/04/12 07:16 PM
4

Oh go back to /r/games where you can pretend you aren't living a sad little sexless life crying yourself to sleep after you jerk off to the hope that if you just suck up and beg a little more you might finally get a woman to pity fuck you. Don't be mad. Be glad someone finally gave you the truth.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 11:14 AM
0

Well... get the fuck out already then? Nobody is making you stay here.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:25 AM
7

Heh "one girl"... that's not such an anomaly.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:20 AM
6

It's because the titanic sank on April 14-15, 1912. So it's the the 100th "anniversary" and everybody is obsessed about it.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 05:27 AM
5

I removed it, but your bringing up one single movie as a counter was so ridiculous I said it out of reflex.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:53 PM
17

A lot of people try to say we are misogynists or overly-paranoid for thinking women do that... but they do.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:50 PM
2

All you did there was cherry-pick one movie. That's not even remotely a counter to my statement. Tell you what though - want a Bechdel test for men? It must be a romance movie that: Isn't two men competing for one woman. Both men aren't alphas in their respective areas. Doesn't put all the burden on the male to pursue, enlighten himself, and woo her at the end with an emotional plea because she's so amazing.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:45 PM
3

There has been much progress in reducing prison rape Could you link to that data? I'm not asking in a "no you're wrong prove it sense!"... just that I'd like to see that data and it would be useful.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:23 PM
2

It does when selective enforcement (which is based on gender) comes into the picture.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:19 PM
23

Don't trust what you read on that paper. Go talk to the lawyer tomorrow and explain the situation to them. We can't really give legal advice here (since we are not lawyers) - it's best to talk to a local expert/lawyer. Bear in mind too that if she's trying to get you on the hook for this - she's going to be desperate and try anything she can. She's going to be in "it doesn't matter who, but someone has to pay for my child" mode - and that's dangerous.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:15 PM
1

What? There are plenty of movies of women doing business with other women and plotting murders together.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:13 PM
16

Yep, get a lawyer now. The cost is far less than the cost of being on the hook. Don't wait. Do it immediately - that paperwork has a 30 day until you are screwed deadline.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:10 PM
4

It is impossible to tell the difference between a male-hating rabit SRS feminist and someone sarcastically pretending to be them.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 09:27 PM
5

First off - be sure you understand the difference between a false rape claim (no one was raped) and a false rape accusation (the wrong person is accused). However this is like trying to ask about illegal drug use - the people involved aren't going to be forthcoming about information. All we really know is that false rape claims that are found out are less than rape claims made. We also know though that some successful prosecutions were made against people later proven to be innocent by DNA evide…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 09:25 PM
4

Politically, Jo Wood has to believe they are true. If she doesn't, her center wouldn't receive the same funding, she'd be attacked for "blaming the victim", etc. In her heart of hearts she probably knows it's bullshit, but what can she do?
/r/MensRights15/04/12 08:51 PM
16

This is a discussion board and we are talking in generalizations about the dating arena. You are being downvoted for just whining and flaming rather than making an actual counter-argument about the general case.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 08:46 PM
2

Agreed. GWW is totally legit in my view. I was talking about the OP.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 05:11 AM
4

They try to use "reactionary" as the attack to say we are responding to having lost our male privilege. We never had that though. Most all of us here grew up in a feminist society where women already had the upper hand. We aren't reactionary to having lost some advantage - because none of us ever did. None of us ever remember a time when men had the advantage. We just weren't alive then, if such a time did ever exist. We are reactionary to feminism's failure to promote real equality.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 02:49 AM
53

The lesson: DO NOT DO 'DIY' SPERM DONATION
/r/MensRights15/04/12 01:36 AM
26

How it works: If it hurts women - it's patriarchy, because men are all rapists. If it hurts men - it's patriarchy, because patriarchy hurts men too. If it helps women - it's patriarchy, because benevolent sexism. If it helps men - it's clear proof of patriarchy!
/r/MensRights15/04/12 01:27 AM
8

The harsh truth feminists need to face is that the men's rights movement grew because of feminism's failure as an equality movement and philosophical decline into a purely women's lobbying organization. Feminists had the chance to avoid that - but got greedy.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 01:14 AM
2

Yeah. I don't always do that, but I've been in a few situations where I was pretty sure the person was trying to lay a trap. So I'd make sure to quote their post in my reply so they couldn't edit it, sometimes try to remind them that feminists are the enemy not women, and respond in a way that if an outside party saw it even if they stretched and reached they couldn't spin it in a bad light. Of course you never hear these "mra exposers" post saying "I did an experiment and they turned out to be …
/r/MensRights15/04/12 12:55 AM
11

Why is a 4 day old account telling us what we should talk about?
/r/MensRights15/04/12 12:51 AM
3

The simple paradox: If women can do the things men can - then women can physically brutalize a man just as men can a woman. If women can't do the things men can - then equality isn't really an achievable goal. To try and have it both ways - is just feminist hypocrisy. Either women should be treated as equals even when that means women are held responsible or they shouldn't.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 10:19 PM
9

Evidently men in jail don't get raped ever either. It's pretty clear lesthistles1 is just talking out their ass.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 10:15 PM
9

My father raised me in the "you never ever ever ever EVER hit women" mindset. You walk away or at worst hold them so they can't do harm to themselves or others. However my mother was raised in the "smack them if they misbehave" mindset. So for some odd years I'd be hit, usually in the face, if I she got upset at me for whatever reason. About when I was a teenager I got tired of being hit, so one day as she was doing it in a row - I told her to stop. Then I told her I'd hit her back... after the …
/r/MensRights14/04/12 10:02 PM
16

Isn't it obvious? Girls aren't scared - because they have a choice here. Boys are scared - because they have no power at all. She can abort or put up for adoption, he simply has to go along with her choice.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 09:40 PM
3

Increasingly the term "feminist" doesn't really seem to mean anything.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:49 AM
2

So you want women to have the right to interrupt discussions here, but you don't want it safe for men to talk in women's reddits. rolls eyes
/r/MensRights14/04/12 01:56 AM
8

Eh, we get accused of everything they can project that we are. If you were to believe them, then we'd be all for killing and raping and abusing and hurting and basically serving satan and hitler.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 12:10 AM
3

I don't think so - I think it's the same eschatology troll... but I am frankly getting tired of this suicide-thing myself. It's gotten to the level of meta-meta-meta-meta-meta-trolling and nobody can really know what's going on anymore... and the legitimate possibility of a third-party trying to play us against srs could be true. So, although I'm sure I'll get shit over it - I'm going to remove the thread from /r/antisrs in a few minutes.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 11:35 PM
5

Indeed - and consider what they wrote here: Ultimately, I'm hoping someone sends death threats my way. ... I love the hate that is directed my way. I want to see how much of it I can generate. That's why I'm trying to get white supremacists to freak out. Source
/r/MensRights13/04/12 08:31 PM
6

You're a liar. You've done it repeatedly and shown you will do it just to manipulate. So your claims of truth mean absolutely fucking zero.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 08:28 PM
8

Sure you are. You lie, then you lie more, and now you expect us to believe ANYTHING you say? I think you were the sister of black visions troll too... and no matter what you say, as everyone knows you are a liar - no one will believe you saying otherwise.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 08:28 PM
8

I don't think that it should be so us vs them Have you ever been to /r/feminism or /r/feminisms? It IS us vs them. They are openly hostile attacking us.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 06:36 PM
6

and being a victim is the best thing someone can be, and people often compete to see who is the biggest victim. I actually had a morbid sci-fi idea based on that concept. Basically (in the not-too-distant future...) the idea is that whoever can claim the greatest victimhood has the most power to get their way. Think if "oppression olympics" were codified into law, where people competed to have their status seen as more inferior, because inferiority was what gave you power over others. Insane? Lo…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 06:34 PM
5

When feminists say mra's should just be feminists, we should just link to all the feminists making it clear mra's aren't welcome there.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 06:23 PM
1

You started assuming first with your "you don't know what's going on... I know what's going on!!!" rantings.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 06:13 PM
1

femisogynist - we need to start using that term
/r/MensRights13/04/12 06:05 PM
30

Put simply: Women being able to serve in combat is a choice - so they want it. Women being eligible for the draft is a responsibility - they don't want that.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 06:03 PM
4

The feminist philosophy here is simple: It's her child when she wants control over it. It's your child when she wants control over you.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:33 AM
9

You have a habit of coming here to attack the MRM and say "this doesn't belong here!" You didn't post here before a month ago and all your posts here seem to be atttacks: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/s2ify/feminists_want_all_of_the_opportunities_but_none/c4ak00l http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/r6cy3/woman_goes_crazy_in_class_hits_a_guy_without/c43b2h1 http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/r17li/some_definitions_taken_from_the_feminist/c422sbh
/r/MensRights12/04/12 09:08 PM
2

If you are going to draw a line on this, draw it on where it starts. Otherwise you can just say "well, second generation is still kind of okay... make it illegal for third generation!... or make it illegal for fourth generation!" By your own argument it's not as "rapidly as assumed" - just how many generations before problems manifest? No, the sensible thing is to make the act that causes the problem itself illegal, not at some arbitrary point of excessive genetic abomination.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 07:24 PM
1

Rapid enough that it becomes a major problem within a couple generations.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:39 PM
1

You can't separate sexual relationship from having children. They have sex, they conceive - now what? Kill the baby?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:38 PM
3

I've never encountered a well reasoned argument as to why incest should be illegal Inbreeding causes genetic degradation.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:54 AM
10

slamdog: -100 comment karma, redditor 16 days
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:52 AM
13

verygood: 40 link karma, -69 comment karma, redditor THREE YEARS Post on your main you coward. Your projection and trying to paint us as you want to see us is bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:50 AM
4

I kind of disagree. He's clearly kind of .. stupid. This is the type of thing that if you let them go on long enough, they'll start to do really dumb stuff. Then after, whenever anybody brings up the eye-rolling "stomach-punching' argument - we can just point to all the other stupid shit the same person did.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:16 AM
6

They've posted to SRS before. There's been a bunch of stuff on ANTISRS with SRSrs saying "prove it's us!" and even the blogger saying "no I'm not SRS!" to the point where it's pretty obvious they want to be able to do this shit without SRS being called on it.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:14 AM
3

It's hard to say if that's real or not. In the original thread, they claimed not to be the person... but I'm skeptical and think there's a good chance they still are. In the original thread I didn't really buy that they were an ally, more of a feminist who just thought they were... i.e. one of the still idealistic ones who don't realize what they are getting into. They didn't really have much to say, but avoided being agitating for the most part. Now they edited that original thread - but seem m…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:08 AM
6

Uh, if your dad is opposed to gay people being married - then he should love gay people getting divorced!
/r/MensRights12/04/12 10:32 AM
4

When the law treats a race or gender differently - it's hard to really say if that race/gender is truly more criminally oriented or not.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 01:56 AM
1

I guess you are right, but men are becoming more submissive towards women, i find this a disturbing trend. we should really be on equal ground no? In general yes, although I think the more important aspect is that both should have a choice. Women should be able to be submissive if they choose to, and men should be able to as well. Right now we are in a world that seems to think everyone should be dominant.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 12:34 AM
3

That's the political approach: Bemoan the wage gap to your constituents to get re-elected. Knowing the wage gap is just bullshit, do nothing about it.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 12:30 AM
1

I know its unfortunate we were under the femnazi boot, my mother left my father when i was one because she felt that a baby was too much work, she left him with a mountain of her schooling debt, and at just 20, he raised me. he raised me to believe that one day men can be equal to women, and they get away with shit like that. People only get away with what you let them get away with. Human nature often tends towards the selfish. It isn't really a problem of gender biology, it is a problem of set…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 12:26 AM
3

All i can say is, I miss the 50's where a man is the head of the house and calls the shots. Back in those days, you could just back hand her smoke a cigarette, drink your 30 year old scotch, and get on with your fucking life. jonnysan, if you were a married man like that in the 1950, that would make you around about 80 right now. I seriously doubt you are that. We weren't raised in a world like you describe. What you describe is a television fantasy anyway. The people of this generation have bee…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 12:15 AM
1

I think it would be easier forward if you threw off the dead weight.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 11:09 PM
4

You seem very vested in your mindset, which I understand. However let me explain with an analogy - although I'm sure you'll try to pick holes in what is just an analogy. Sometimes if a person's leg is infected you can heal the leg and save it. Othertimes, say it is cancerous, crawling with maggots, and gangrene has set in - you cut the leg off to save the patient. That is what egalitarians must do - they must cut feminism off, because although there is still some healthy flesh - the rest has bec…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:49 PM
1

I doubt it. This is the type of thing selective-enforcement became a term from. Let me know when we see men win these things against women.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:47 PM
10

...but the MAJORITY do. I can fill up a wall of text of all the things wrong the majority of feminists either support or take a blind eye to. When you try to claim you don't - who cares? You're still going along with an organization where the majority of the members are doing all that evil stuff you claim to reject. You aren't going to reclaim the word 'feminism' until you manage to distance feminism as a whole from those things.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:23 PM
7

Why does everyone insist on the theory of limited goods? ... because feminists do? because we live in the real world, which has limited goods? When feminists say there's a need for hiring quotas, affirmative action, a wage-gap, etc - it is because they are insisting on a theory of limited goods.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:03 PM
3

Why was it necessary to post that on a throwaway account?
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:00 PM
14

How it works: Minorities sent to jail in greater numbers : Pretty blatant example of racism in the system. Males send to jail in greater numbers : Men clearly commit a lot more crimes!
/r/MensRights11/04/12 07:58 PM
8

Feminism doesn't help men unless it helps women first and will never sacrifice any female advantage so that men might gain in the interests of overall equality - There has never been an exception to that. You don't get to decide that anti-male misandrists aren't feminists. They say they are and they wrap themselves in the same lingo & organization, with plenty of support. They ARE feminists, you just don't like that aspect of feminism. Even YOU, who claim to be a "good" feminist who really cares…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 07:51 PM
3

We know that there are MORE at least... also that false accusations would be more likely because they know there would have to be permission. Regardless Im pointing out correlation not causation.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 07:15 PM
3

Case examples? We already have examples of women making false rape accusations in the real world, that are only proven by strange methods like having video recorded the sex. "It will mean that judgments that a person is guilty of sexual harassment will be easier to achieve." - is blatant propaganda. Even worse is how they hid the equivalent statement "It will mean that judgments that an innocent person is guilty of RAPE will be more common." There's a reason we have a court system as we do - wit…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:28 PM
5

Especially the rad-fem marxist-communist version of feminism.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:16 PM
5

"All men are enemies. All animals are comrades." "No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?" "Besides, in those days they had been slaves and now they were free, and that made all the difference, as Squealer did not fail to point out." and in the end... "No question now, what had happened to the face…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:08 PM
4

How often have we seen this with false rape accusations: showed police a video he had taken of their sex act on his cell phone. (followed by) and she admitted it was all a lie. I did a little casual research to compare 2-party recording laws and forcible rape statistics: Forcible rape by state 1 California: 9,212 2 Texas: 8,372 3 Florida: 6,475 4 Michigan: 5,269 5 Ohio: 4,548 6 Illinois: 4,078 7 Pennsylvania: 3,401 8 New York: 3,169 9 Washington: 2,746 States with 2-party recording laws (both ha…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:03 PM
5

Every day, "Animal Farm" becomes more relevant to discussions about feminism.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:55 PM
8

Two possibilities here: Women tend to actually tolerate pain better or Women tend to overstate the pain they are in
/r/MensRights11/04/12 05:48 PM
3

You sound like the type of people who act like america is the rape-culture women-oppressing capital of the world, too. However.. We do know what's going on on the ground in India - and it's not the simplistic patriarchy oppressing all the poor women picture you'd like to paint. There's a reason for the massively growing men's rights movement there too. Go on, read that - it's about dowries in India.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 11:46 AM
5

The Peak could not find any instances of similar support groups on any university campuses in Canada. That's so depressing.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 10:53 AM
7

There was another thread here about that article - with people speaking out against it.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:30 AM
26

Thoughtcrime. You can't prove where someone was really looking or why. You can't prove what someone is thinking or why. Yet leave it up to feminists to claim it as a right to tell you.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 12:39 AM
5

Well, I hope you know and understand the imbalance there. There is not equality when it comes to that. A woman can wail on a guy and generally speaking he'll go to jail if police come. If he so much as pokes her with his pinky he's in DEEEEEEP shit. Women are generally free to abuse men.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 11:14 PM
-5

Sadly your dad was right to. He'd never win and he'd be called an accomplice for your brother fighting back. Yeah though, that's a "whataboutthemenz" dismissal. Remember it each and every time you hear a feminist claim to be about equality for men too.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 09:26 PM
15

That's called a "whataboutthemenz dismissal" Basically feminists claim to support equality for both genders, but if you actually bring up any male issues they go "stop doing whataboutthemenz! There are bigger problems women face! Once those bigger problems are solved we'll worry about men!" It is how feminists without batting an eye claim to support men while ignoring every single last male concern - perpetually and repeatedly.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 08:48 PM
20

$6000 in restitution is a slap on the wrist. Ask someone what they'd rather have - a year in jail or to pay $6000.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 08:44 PM
10

I disagreed with it publicly here. It was one of the few times I think most of /r/mensrights and I disagree strongly on something. If someone wants to out themselves publicly (like Paul Elam or Rebecca Watson) - that's fine. For those who don't though, they should keep their privacy and discussions should just be in the mental arena.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 08:42 PM
3

Bad, is what kind.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 12:19 PM
1

Sometimes putting in blanks lets you see the truth of things more clearly. Under this law, no evidence has to be produced by the woman alleging _______ and the police can arrest him immediately. ___ depends on the discretion of the judge and he is considered guilty until he can prove his innocence. The law is deliberately draconian. One of the great evils of society is women being _____ even though _____ has been outlawed for more than five decades. It is sad that the only hope for change is thi…
/r/MensRights10/04/12 12:07 PM
10

Is SRS a feminist subreddit, and the pro-actively banned me? Yes. Not just a feminist subreddit though - a rad-fem's troll haven reddit.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 11:49 AM
6

Dude at the end is awesome. Puts everybody to shame. I'd have liked to see what would have happened if the girl had been all "I'm going to go get some coffee" and how the guys would have responded.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:57 AM
18

Exactly what I saw right off too. "I don't want to paint that author as a hypocritical bitch pretending she's not about to blatantly stereotype, but that author is a hypocritical bitch pretending she's not blatantly stereotyping." Surely she won't get upset I said that... because I did say I didn't want to paint her that way in a blatant stereotype.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 04:58 AM
6

I've had my disagreements with Paul Elam in the past. He goes and posts elsewhere form here so I don't go there and attack him. However I don't approve of his writing. So the question here is one of terminology. If there are divisions within the men's rights movement, which is healthy as it shows we are growing - we should have ways to describe and distinguish them.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 04:23 AM
4

Google's "define:feminism" says: The hatred of men by women: "her feminism is just poorly disguised misandry".... which, like Google often is - is dead on accurate and relevant Rad-fems try to say it doesn't exist so they won't be culpable when they commit it, which they will. That's what's going on with it. That's all. That's it.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 02:53 AM
2

There's some truth to that. Not all women want such, but many do want the male gaze, they do want to feel submissive, they do want to feel like a sexual object. SOME PEOPLE. SOME DO - hold your damn flaming abstract feminist reader that probably downvoted tripuck too. I'm not saying all women. I can hear you readying to reply with the 'how dare you' flames. For those women, life can be pretty tough actually. They get plenty of scorn from women for it, and they've been raised in a feminist societ…
/r/MensRights10/04/12 01:33 AM
1

There are some places that thinks walking around wearing a klansman outfit and waving 100 dollar bills around shouting "kill all minorities" alone at night - means you deserve to be attacked! Can you imagine! That's just free speech! Nobody deserves to be attacked!
/r/MensRights10/04/12 01:27 AM
2

It's because they want to be able to say "Oh gods look at all the men who simply can't take their eyes of my incredibly gorgeous self. I certainly don't want such attention and my clothes are irrelevant. It's just haarrrrrrrd being so beautiful and pretty that men can't help but stare. They really should pass a law to make them stop because I certainly don't want all that attention, no....""
/r/MensRights10/04/12 01:24 AM
4

Simply correct them while linking to where they were corrected, then link to showing they already knew it was inaccurate - point out they are intentionally seeding disinformation to try and deceive readers. Neutral readers don't like being intentionally mislead. i.e. "Hi as you already know that's inaccurate and it's very intellectually dishonest of you to continue trying to mislead people. Have some respect for the reader - try to get them reliable information so they can judge for themselves b…
/r/MensRights10/04/12 01:13 AM
3

Despite not all cases resulting in successful prosecution There's something very wrong when people have to apologize that not all accusations end in successful prosecution. Some may not immediately see why it's wrong, and that's WHY it is so very very wrong.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 12:16 AM
8

I've been around long enough to know there are exceptions. Even though I'm 95% of the time staunchly anti-feminist, it is because I believe that most feminists are anti-male and see feminism as a women's lobbying organization that will give them ever more power, and that we've already long passed the point where women had equality, now it's just more and more privilege for women. However that still leaves 5% who aren't.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 11:16 PM
7

"Disarm cops. Arm gender supremacy movement." "Disarm cops. Arm racial supremacy movement." Yeah it sounds bad however you try to spin it.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 11:09 PM
7

How it works: Your gender is irrelevant! Choose to be whatever you like! If you chose male though, you're a shitlord asshole at blame for all the world's woes.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 10:10 PM
18

So basically "Other guys are wrong, listen to me because I'm one of the types of guys you should sleep with."
/r/MensRights09/04/12 09:45 PM
1

Did you read the article ignatius? It isn't about "veterans need help", it is about women veterans and special centers just for female veterans. There aren't (as far as I know) special centers just for male veterans. These are combat veterans too. It is probably far to say that both genders may have suffered some serious shit and both genders may have been sexually assaulted.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 12:53 PM
7

My advice is just appreciate him, feel lucky, and forget all this gender warfare nonsense - to go have a happy life together where you both treat each other with all the best you can give.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 12:17 PM
2

I just think it's an interesting topic... something more complex and nuanced than the usual articles. Male homeless veterans are clearly a huge issue that doesn't receive much attention, female homeless veterans are an issue as well... but proportionally do they deserve special attention? Particularly if that takes away from attention to male veterans? There are many special considerations - veterans of other racists, or sexual orientation, wounded vs non-wounded... is gender important? I don't …
/r/MensRights09/04/12 12:14 PM
3

Wow, I like the part where she almost took some responsibility for it.. right before blaming everyone else but her. To her it's all "bad luck" and "men's laziness" and "other slutty women" She just doesn't get it. She's incapable of seeing how any of it is really her fault. The closest she got was briefly mentioning that one of her boyfriends she wasn't ready to commit to.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 11:28 AM
10

“you play, you pay’’ How that works: Men: “you play, you pay’’ Women: “you play, he pays’’
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:25 AM
7

I'm not going to call her that. She's just another feminist with delusions who needs to play the victim.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:08 PM
2

Sorry, didn't mean to imply that you were saying it... and yes that's a common belief. It goes right along with a lot of other stereotypes
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:06 PM
40

bi-phobia There's no evidence to support it. It is nice and insulting to hear that I'm "really" gay though. That's not condescending and ignorant as all fuck. As for the rest, let's just reduce it down: "You want a man that has no female friends for you to compete with, makes a ton of money, will see you as a superior, will support only your children no one else's, and all their attention is on you.. but not so much it makes them seem clingy or less than a true alpha male!"
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:00 PM
7

Rebecca Watson? You mean the delusional feminist who thinks a conversation in an elevator is attempted rape? Yeah she hates us for not supporting her "I'm so incredibly attractive and nearly raped" self-indulgent made-up victim complex. I think she's tried posting here and got laughed right out of the reddit. So now she's got a vendetta against us.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 10:46 PM
66

So... SRS posts fake article to try and make it seem the MR is okay with punching a woman in the stomach who trying to cuckold him - MASSIVE MEDIA OUTRAGE AGAINST MRM! Mainstream media posts 'hilarious' article about a home invasion followed by sexual violence against men, full of puns and brutal attacks - given a pass by SRS, what's the big deal! So what is this regendered? An ex-boyfriend home-invades a woman's home, takes pliers to her clitoral hood, then uses a powerdrill on her ovaries, fol…
/r/MensRights08/04/12 09:35 PM
2

The term "feminist" is pretty much meaningless if the two extremes are in direct opposition.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 07:16 PM
7

Aren't we discussing and not ignoring SRS right now? Yeah, they aren't capable of actual discussion. We all know that. However they don't always come here waving the SRS flag. There's a lot of hidden trolls on alts and sockpuppets who may or may not be from SRS too.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 07:15 PM
5

Yep, women have the extreme advantage there - if a surrogate is used, the surrogate has all the rights. If a sperm donor is used, the woman has all the rights.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 05:41 AM
7

Yeah but men are like... privileged, so it doesn't count if they are gang-raped in massive numbers!
/r/MensRights07/04/12 11:26 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 10:46 PM
126

This is like where the feminist academics who say it's good for people to go through being falsely accused, so they understand what the consequences are like if they actually did something. Which is exactly like saying it's good for women to be raped, so that they understand the dangers of being raped.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 10:30 PM
17

The theory is that you are leveraging wealth against women, forcing them into giving up their child in return for money. So it is treated similar to arguments against prostitution - that women can't make money off their uterus except within the established marriage framework which is designed to screw men over.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 10:13 PM
1

It still doesn't matter unless you can have paternity tests done. Otherwise she'll just fuck some random guy then say you are the father and you're hooked for child support since you can't prove otherwise without a paternity test. ... which is why the real battle is there. Feminists aren't going to lobby for truth there. They don't want mandatory paternity tests.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 09:25 PM
1

I'm not really interested in discussions with a woman coming here trying to tell men to be less active about fighting for men's rights. It reeks of conflict of interest and the same kind of entitled control-freak behavior that we are trying to fight in the first place.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 09:15 PM
1

Probably the same reason women come here and try to tell a men's rights reddit how to act?
/r/MensRights07/04/12 03:20 PM
24

Punch a woman: Not okay. Punch a man: Okay. That's what Jezebel and SRS evidently call equality.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 08:40 AM
4

9-day old concern troll, and I'm going to point that out to people when I see you concern trolling here.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 04:00 AM
1

I'm not playing this game with you anymore. You're outed.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 03:55 AM
0

You aren't an MRA because you've admitted to it.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 03:48 AM
3

Does that mean that you, aetheralloy had to be a feminist for possibly years before you're allowed to criticise them in a fair manner? Actually I was for years, tyvm. I'm saying though that I don't care to hear your rationalizations for coming here as a concern troll. You aren't an MRA. You're a concern troll.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 03:41 AM
7

I've got nothing against the mens rights movement I repeat. You aren't an MRA. I don't care to hear your rationalizations for coming here as a concern troll. You aren't an MRA. You're a concern troll.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 03:41 AM
24

I'm bisexual. So, yeah - it's because of their own prejudices and bigotry.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 02:36 AM
3

You didn't claim it. I am. Why is it you all fit into this same cliche - I look through your post histories and it's the same story every time. You barely posted here before this week, all your posts are attacking mra posts and giving passes to women. It's all "how is this mensrights" and excuses for feminists and women. You don't actually say anything yourself except to attack mra's. You're all new accounts or new to the reddit. What's with that? What IS that? That's not being an MRA. That's be…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 02:27 AM
0

Troll is a term with various meanings. You wrote this however: I do argue with MRAs, not deny that (no way that I can). I wouldn't say I'm here to argue with MRAs. So, alright - you aren't an MRA and you argue with us. You claim you aren't here to argue with us. Yet you do. Perhaps you get lost in the crowd of people who are here just to argue and troll. It can be very hard to tell who is just arguing with us and who is just arguing with us.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 01:56 AM
2

I think you should consider taking a step back and lurk for a while - read some of the articles that come through here. Don't post for a while, just read.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 01:38 AM
2

So in short You have nothing to contribute except attacks. You only see the women's side of things. You didn't post up until you your few that were purely to attack. You rolls eyes claim to have founded a men's rights chapter at your university.. but conveniently can't confirm. Let me make this simple - what parts of men's rights do you agree with?
/r/MensRights07/04/12 01:27 AM
4

We've seen plenty of other reddits (anarchism & srs) try to do sabotage operations here before.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 01:23 AM
1

You're still dodging the question. You're still just trying to argue your points and not answer and you aren't actually arguing any men's rights - you're purely arguing for women. I'm asking why all your posts here are attacks on what's posted here. You are indistinguishable from a concern troll. Honestly I think you're full of shit when you claim to be an MRA. All your posts are feminist-oriented and against what's posted here. All of your arguments are based on arguing the woman's side. It's t…
/r/MensRights07/04/12 01:17 AM
1

That's still a dodge of the real question. Why is your opening post here an attack on what's posted here? Why are all your posts after attacks on mra posts? I don't see a single pro-mra post from you at all. If you were really involved you'd have probably posted other things here first. So why the first is an attack?
/r/MensRights07/04/12 01:00 AM
1

Uhm, alright except how do we believe you? You're claiming a bunch of stuff but there's no proof of any of it - and your opening posts here were to dictate what belonged in this reddit. How do we know you aren't just another troll here to disrupt?
/r/MensRights07/04/12 12:55 AM
3

Pretty much "male sexism against women is bad, but female sexism against men can't exist therefore it's fine!" is their argument.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 11:57 PM
4

Please stop trying to troll me doch_doch.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 10:33 PM
1

Please stop trying to troll me doch_doch.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 10:29 PM
0

Please stop trying to troll me doch_doch.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 10:29 PM
3

On a personal note to aetheralloy: There are generally two ways to deal with you. Ignore you, or have ridiculous arguments with you because you have little to say and actually just plain dislike women. You think feminist trolls come to downvote you, but you're wrong. It's the regulars here that do that because you make everyone else look bad. You embarrass everyone truly interested in gender equality. It's only the new people that try to have a dialogue with you and it always ends up ugly. I vot…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 10:16 PM
-1

Why are you jumping in here?
/r/MensRights06/04/12 10:15 PM
0

I think you are posting more sincerely and genuine than most and I wasn't directing the question at people like you who were asking it wanting an actual answer. I will say though, that posting only to argue with mra's isn't really helpful. To really help out you need to post topics, argue with non-mra's (and there are plenty that come here). There is sort of "what would you say you do here?" aspect to it all. If you only lurk except to argue with mra's - then you aren't contributing, you are dis…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:28 PM
6

What you are looking at there is feminist's current state without how it got there. You are seeing that they changed the language without the path of how it got there. There is no way a logical person can believe that in the U.S. a father has "the authority over women, children, and property". No one who has witnessed a divorce can possibly believe that. So feminists shifted the definition from "patriarchal" to "The Patriarchy" because they were losing the debates. So now "The Patriarchy" is som…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:14 PM
-1

Perhaps we could get a sidebar/FAQ about it? It would be helpful to just link to that and avoid all the repetition and derailing. I mean sure it is TOPIC #1 in our FAQ - http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/71ues/faq1_why_did_you_post_this_what_does_a_crazy_evil/ ... but for some reason the people coming here to tell us what we should and shouldn't post don't read the FAQ first.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:02 PM
12

This is known as "framing the debate". In game theory it is setting up the game so that you win no matter how it is played. For instance if a feminist can frame the debate as "Does the patriarchy hurt men or women more?", then they win - because you've been reigned into a debate that already presupposes patriarchy exists. Unless you reframe the debate, you'll always be on the defensive because they can work from the base that patriarchy does exist. They'll control the terms of the rest of the de…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:59 PM
2

I do ignatius, or at least I used to. They aren't really asking though, they are trying to tell. If you explain, they just argue. They aren't sincere in asking. It's more like concern trolling.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:42 PM
-1

Except I don't think they are genuine in asking. They aren't really asking people to explain. They are making a statement as a question then refuting anyone who does try to explain. What they are really saying is "This doesn't belong in this reddit I've never been to before and don't understand, yet am going to claim I know all about it and argue with the members who have been here a while."
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:41 PM
0

I mean if you search their post history they generally haven't posted to /r/mensrights before that day.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:33 PM
1

I'm slightly confused. Are you saying that frequent posters to MR are not taken seriously when they point out that something isn't MRs related but non-frequent poster are still taken seriously? No. I'm saying that it isn't just confirmation bias when I look at people saying "why is this in mensrights" and they are people who haven't posted there before that day. I don't really see MRA's asking that question. It's always somebody new. Clearly not everything belongs here - but even when known MRA'…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:20 PM
89

Throw it on the pile of false rape accusations that feminists and SRS say don't happen.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 07:00 PM
3

Hi! You are a candidate to explain The "This has nothing to do with Men's Rights!" phenomena from non-MRA's.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:02 PM
1

Hi! You are a candidate to explain The "This has nothing to do with Men's Rights!" phenomena from non-MRA's.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:02 PM
2

Hi! You are a candidate to explain The "This has nothing to do with Men's Rights!" phenomena from non-MRA's.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:01 PM
2

You can cry as a man, but then you are beta-zoned. That's really what this all comes down to. There's all kinds of things you can do as a man now, but to do them marks you as something other than a "real" man. You'll get friendzoned, devalued as a mate, looked down on by other men, etc. Crying is one of those things men have learned can be very manipulative too. It's a sincere cry and you cry maybe once a year? Then it means something. You cry everytime something slightly possibly minorly upsett…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:55 PM
12

I think it is part of an organized campaign. Hell even this thread was downvoted for.. what? It seems some people outside of /r/mensrights don't want us to discuss this. In some cases it is blatant trolls and sockpuppets. In other cases it seems random. It's just strange to have all these people wander in and suddenly act like they are mra's stating that something shouldn't be posted here - and when the known mra's explain why it is, they argue about it.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:47 PM
2

I try to put a lot of meaning into minimal words, maybe.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 10:20 AM
6

Feminism.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:47 AM
6

Captain Obvious you're a true hero.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:17 AM
13

Unfortunately no. That really is the batshit belief status quo at places like /srs and /anarchism
/r/MensRights06/04/12 08:08 AM
2

I like this comment from there: At first I thought the gender swap in your post was asinine. Then I read some of the replies you got. I still don't really understand why you swapped the genders at first, but it has resulted in a pretty eye-opening social experiment on the hive mind. It just proves that reddit is not nearly as resistant to preconceived notions and presumption nor as open-minded about gender dynamics as we like to think we are.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:36 AM
20

Learn to call women like that "asshole". If you call a woman a bitch, it's gendered and she's taught that no matter what the situation - her correct response is to lash out aat you, probably physically - and she'll always be backed up by everyone for it. So say "hey asshole! Stop being lazy!". Treat her laziness with contempt, just like you would a man. ... because frankly friends & feminists - that IS equality.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:54 AM
7

The facts: Wives file for divorce more from husbands than husbands file for divorce from wives. Lesbians file for divorce more than gay men do. It doesn't require a degree in statistics to conclude that women are more prone to divorce. The question here is why. The fact that they are is indisputable.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 01:27 AM
2

I don't see that at all. I think you are projecting. They are simply stating what is and wondering why that's such a radical concept to accept.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:14 PM
5

Sure. I'm not saying it is genetic. I'm saying it is systemic sexist policy against men. Which is ironic, because according to certain groups (/feminisms and /srs) it is impossible to have systemic sexism against men. Yet there it is, in hard data and inarguable to anyone with half a brain.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:07 PM
5

The feminist cognitive dissonance is finally exploding. On the one side they are trying to say "marriage is slavery for women".. and on the other side "men are children who don't want to marry!" Well.. if it were actually slavery and not essentially free cash for women - they wouldn't be clamoring and pressuring men to marry and men would be happy to have a slave, right? Except men aren't... because men are starting to know better.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:04 PM
5

Independent and assertive are great traits in the work world. Not so great for marriage. "gender-aware" is a meaningless term.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 09:20 PM
17

Did your account get hacked? There's blatant data, across the board - and without exception - that women initiate divorce more than men. That's not a case of "both have to put forth effort", it's a clear gender difference. We can argue all day about why women initiate more than men, but it's absolutely ludicrous to act like they don't.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 09:12 PM
4

Patriarchy is just the conspiracy theory feminists come up with when smoking pot. Take any group, get them high and talking - and they'll inevitably come up with a grand conspiracy made up of whoever isn't in the room.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 08:55 PM
8

It's like the "patriarchy" switched sides.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 08:15 PM
11

I swear reddit has never heard of "safe/sane/consensual" or safewords.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 08:12 PM
2

This is the lazy way of doing it. They aren't challenging gender roles, all they did was swap the child models.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 08:05 PM
1

I think it's fascinating because it's a paradox of their own creation. Affirmative action doesn't come into it. Nobody is forcing them to do anything. They just have two completely arbitrary traditions opposed to each other. They can do whatever they want, really... but they still have to end up breaking one of the traditions. I'm just curious to see what they do.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 08:03 PM
5

That's because feminism is one-way equality. If it helps women, they are for equality. If it helps women and helps men, they are for equality. If it just helps men, they don't give a fucking shit. If it hurts men, then it helps women, and they are for it... you know, for equality.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:46 PM
7

Regendered to the mothers of girls who were statuatory raped: You girls are just mad you didn't get to have sex with older men when you were teenagers. I did and they were some of the best experiences of my young life. I realize there is a double standard here too but the venom and invective you women use to demonize these men is just plain crazy. Find another way to get this point across.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:44 PM
1

Derp. A woman trying to dictate what matters to men's rights. Fucking seriously?
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:39 PM
7

You again, sitting downvoted to -13. There is no us here. You aren't an MRA. You're a concern troll and I'm going to keep calling you on it.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:39 PM
5

They aren't really that great for sportfucking. entitled + golden uterus complex = no effort in bed.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:33 PM
2

Oh horseshit. Everybody thinks their statements are "clearly true" and their non-mra opinion here should be valued! It's like you think you are some special snowflake and we've nobody else like you coming here smugly sure of themselves and how wrong we are. You're a cliche. You're just too new to see it. You're just concern trolling and I repeat - you aren't an MRA.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 08:11 AM
3

I think you are too new here to understand the response. You just see a reddit, you don't see the other context. You don't see the other groups like /r/shitredditsays, /r/feminisms, /r/anarchism, etc that come here harassing. This is not a closed reddit, we don't ban people for disagreement. It's a warzone. Even among MRA's there's wild disagreement. We don't need more people who aren't even mra's coming here just to argue with us. We've plenty of that.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 08:04 AM
-1

No thanks. We get enough trolls here I'm not interested in engaging yet another.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:43 AM
4

I'm saying you are not an MRA. You are just someone here to argue with MRA's.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:29 AM
8

Interesting, I see the term "reproductive coercion" being used there. We should remember that term.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:07 AM
2

Disagreed. Also after looking through your (7 day) post history, I think you are just concern trolling. We didn't start the oppression olympics game, but if feminists want to play it - then we want accuracy in it. They insist constantly that women have it worse and use it to justify all kinds of double-standards and sexism (and even dispute that sexism can exist against men). That's what we are fighting against.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:01 AM
21

Yep. It's hard and harsh to hear - but this is really about relative value. When women have high value, they are extremely picky because they can be. So even if the guy was everything she was asking for then, she left him. Most divorces are initiated by women, and most breakups are too. The smart women invest in one guy, and don't play the feminism games of "why should I..." with him. Instead they bond with their mate. This woman? I get the feeling she's simply past her prime, low market value l…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 11:42 PM
6

How it works: Single guy : "OMG Playing video games is a sign of his immaturity and unwillingness to commit!" Married guy with children : "OMG Playing video games is a sign of his unwillingness to go outside!" Replace "video games" with "books", "beer", "television", or "sports" - and it's the same argument.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:03 PM
12

Over at ANTISRS we are seeing that this is part of a propaganda campaign that SRS is doing to try and paint us as censoring/banning. That's one thing SRS greatly fears - that increasingly people see SRS as heavy-handed over the top banning and censoring... yet our supposedly bad little reddit is so openly embracing of REAL debate and free speech. So, as SRS does, rather than actually fix their ways - they just go trolling and running smear campaigns.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:43 PM
3

This isn't an MR issue Why is this ALWAYS said by people who haven't posted to this reddit before the day they post it?
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:08 PM
5

Sometimes I really don't know how feminists can keep the cognitive dissonance going without their heads exploding. "Girls beating out boys as cooperative tendencies helps them excel!" "Girls doing worse in school because of bias towards helping boys"
/r/MensRights04/04/12 06:04 AM
2

History has context, those that don't study it lack wisdom and are doomed to repeat it. History changes too. It was quite revealing to find out that Eniac was not the first computer, that turing's enigma codebreaker was.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:53 AM
2

Not you. I mean that's originally what a computer was - a person who computed. It was an accounting/secretarial type job and mostly women. The original meaning of "computer" isn't a machine, it's a person doing the task of computation. So naturally as computers became integrated, women were often the ones running them, to help with computations. Once actual "computing" became less of a thing, software development became a different branch of using computers. That branch was more engineering orie…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:44 AM
7

You said it not me!
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:20 AM
16

There are far fewer actual women haters than trolls pretending to be using false flag tactics. There are far fewer of those too than the legions of people just here to try and stop men from fighting for rights.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 11:59 PM
3

They frame it in terms of what they desire in a man even if only subconsciously. Then they rage that such a man has power over them and demand that power.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 10:40 PM
8

So it's wrong to tell people to be careful but it's fine to stereotpye a entire gender. Got it. Thanks for clarifying.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 10:35 PM
4

Agreed, but it's the results nonetheless.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 10:19 PM
18

Damn, now if only feminists knew as much about domestic violence as domestic violence experts.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 09:58 PM
12

Interestingly, casey also put up the feminism results here: http://i.imgur.com/20JpR.png Also here is the one for Shitredditsays: http://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/comments/nzipz/meta_srs_survey_results/ It turns out that yes SRS is mostly white males.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 08:36 PM
10

Exactly. This isn't actually about stopping rape - it's about painting all men as rapists.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 07:59 PM
4

A great way to understand female privilege is to play one online. All it takes is learning the basic "not interested" defense and then it's staggering how much privilege you have. There's a reason men play women online but women don't really play men. There's a reason most transsexuals are MtF not FtM.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 06:52 PM
5

So do I and my opinion is that you should go back to /r/Subredditdrama where being a shitface "so what" troll is encouraged.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 06:23 PM
35

"Tell women not to cuckold and gold-dig" Downvoted? Of course - if you treat women like women treat men, if you assume them to be liars/thieves/rapists - it's highly offensive. So to everyone downvoting this post, I hope you think for a moment how offensive it is to say "Tell men not to rape", you hypocritical bigots.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 06:16 PM
11

"So what?" - are you 12? Of course we know marketing does that stuff. You aren't brilliant for repeating that. The discussion is about the repercussions of that. If these topics don't interest you - then get out. If they do, then discuss them. Nobody cares to hear your "so what?" handwaving.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 06:15 PM
10

You spend too much time in /r/SubredditDrama. Okay, so you don't get how marketing based on gender is tied to gender discussions. That's fine, but that's your problem, not our's.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 05:48 PM
2

It doesn't require the assumption - it responds to it. If men didn't hold the advantage before - they certainly don't now. If men and women were equal before - then women are gaining the advantage because they've been gaining faster. If women have the advantage now - then it's ridiculous to say men to.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 05:15 PM
14

This topic continues to raise the question: If women are constantly gaining the advantage - at what point do they have the advantage and you can no longer pretend that men do? It must happen at some point - so when? What are the measures of that and have we already reached them?
/r/MensRights03/04/12 04:49 PM
5

So basically this is bone thrown to the police to expand their power of intimidation. Since they can arrest you for virtually anything, the police get to use the "do what I say or we'll do the latex glove snap and sodomize you" to enforce compliance.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 06:59 AM
2

You're going to have to provide more than anecdotal evidence of people on a singular internet forum doing this to justify the statement. No. I'm not. Here we accept that as fact. If you want to disprove it, go ahead. This is /r/mensrights and I'm not going to try and convince you of anything, particularly when I know you don't want to be convinced of it. We link articles here every day with such examples. Look at what the National Organization of Women does. Look at /r/feminism and /r/feminisms.…
/r/MensRights03/04/12 05:37 AM
2

I do remember hearing how computer science used to have a lot more women. I think perhaps the shift was when it went from secretarial type duties to actual programming. Now the people who were programmers are just clerks basically. It always was a somewhat cushy indoor job. At work I see the women tending to group in the business/accounting/marketing sections, and the men in the technical sections. Not entirely of course, but that's the trend.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 04:15 AM
10

As for being banned from SRS, I don't equate SRS and feminists. See, you don't get that right. If a group calls themselves feminists - YOU don't get to say "nah, feminists are good people, those aren't feminists." They are STILL feminists and they STILL oppose men's rights. Your vested interests and dogma in saying otherwise don't change that fact. There's plenty of examples of feminists opposing men's rights. It's lame for you to just handwave them away with "oh but those aren't true feminists"…
/r/MensRights03/04/12 12:20 AM
1

Still not entirely sure. If someone strives to excel, then they generally won't be representative of the whole. Are you saying that because of economic hardship, that Indian women use programming as a path out? I'd agree with that, but damn is that condemning of the luxurious lives white women lead.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 11:57 PM
1

Wow. I didn't know SRS even knew how to use the word maturity. Good show! You fine trolling invading downvote brigading fascist hypocrites are learning!
/r/MensRights02/04/12 11:51 PM
11

It is not espoused by actual feminists. No True Scotsman. Maybe a dash of NAFALT - "Not All Feminists Are Like That" I see PLENTY of feminists fighting against men's rights. They come here every day even. I personally don't see most feminists out there fighting against Men's Rights, Really? You were banned from SRS. Just how long do you think you'll last at SRSDiscussion if you try to talk about men's rights?
/r/MensRights02/04/12 11:48 PM
2

100011011000111000011111010101011101001110011110100011100101
/r/MensRights02/04/12 11:41 PM
1

No worries. I'm great at spotting douchebag trolls. I'm sure I'll be downvoting you again in the future, sockpuppet sir!
/r/MensRights02/04/12 11:41 PM
3

BEEP BOOP FEMINIST SRS BOT LACKS READING COMPREHENSION. PLEASE INSTALL BRAIN BEEEOOP.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 11:34 PM
16

Feminists fight against men's rights. That isn't irrelevant.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 11:33 PM
1

I'm not entirely sure what you were trying to say there, there are a few different ways to take it.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 11:19 PM
1

Yep, I did downvote you. Actually I'm just downvoting you now because of all your whining about it though. Also because I think you're kind of a douchebag and a pretty lame troll. Okay. So that's it for replies from me. Make your last one and call it a day. I'll just be downvoting you regularly from now on. Have a good one!
/r/MensRights02/04/12 11:18 PM
1

StephenMurphySr : -95 karma now That alone is enough to consider you a troll. Karma doesn't mean much except to say "hey, that person is or isn't a troll." ... and you sir - are a troll.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 10:59 PM
3

I have though, because I've met a lot of computer people in my time. The thing is though - they were almost all asian, indian, hispanic, russian, etc. Besides, I'm a rockstar programmer but I don't consider myself a hardware person. Sure I can build a computer from parts, but that's not really the same thing. There's plenty of female mechanical/electrical engineers.. but again.. they tend not to be white girls. Software and hardware are ultimately very different worlds. There is certainly a soci…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 10:56 PM
2

The white girls were, sure. Not the other cultures though. You seem to be acting like there aren't any bookworm girls, nerdy girls, video game girls, etc - and there certainly are. You just probably wouldn't see them as part of your clique because, well.. they are elsewhere being introverted! Probably not a lot of people did see them doing such things... but come on, anybody who went to high school knows there were plenty of socially isolated girls (mostly by other girls) Later in college and th…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 10:29 PM
11

Once the theory of “patriarchy” and “rape culture” took root in mainstream feminist discussions, the very real problems of men and boys got forgotten. Bingo.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 09:30 PM
4

Yep. This entire issue is that white girls aren't willing to put forth the effort. We can debate all day about why, but the fact is that girls of other races are willing to put forth the effort and are accepted as peers - but white girls don't put forth that effort. It's all on them. You can't blame sexism for this one.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 07:39 PM
14

This is a primarily a CULTURAL not a GENDER issue. I work in software development, and here's my take on it: Female programmers are perfectly good programmers. However I have seen virtually no white female programmers. There is a definite stigma among that culture against women being programmers. Female programmers of asian and middle-eastern descent though, are quite common. The problem here, to be blunt - is that white girls consider it shameful, but only white girls.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 05:26 PM
3

I've been saying for a while that psychology was heavily fouled by feminism, originating in the academic sphere. This is just more evidence.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 10:36 AM
-1

I despise feminism because of this statement I see nearly everyone either use or support: "We live in a patriarchy so these two acts are not equivalent." that they use to dismiss all the bigoted anti-male acts that are out there. Until feminism as a whole actively opposes such hateful double-standards towards men - feminism is the enemy.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 10:16 AM
15

Yep that was a big eye-opening shocker to me too, because the media spins it like lesbians and gay men are just best pals who spend all their time together making hip jokes. The truth is, no.. lesbians and gay men don't really get along. Working together for gay rights, sure. Actually spend much time around each other, NO.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 10:12 PM
19

Hell even gay guys are often not allowed in the lesbian bar.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 10:05 PM
31

I also have gay friends who have told me that a lot of women like to get touchy-feely at gay bars. Confirmed. I think they have some attitude that it doesn't matter because 1) we are guys and "guys can take it" or 2) because it's a gay bar and the gay patrons (I'm bi, not gay) wouldn't respond sexually then it's fine because it's just "joking about" Consider though how it would be if a straight guy went to a lesbian bar and was getting touchy-feely with the women there? He'd get his ass kicked, …
/r/MensRights01/04/12 09:58 PM
3

You're an anomaly, an aberration. I'm referring to feminism in general on reddit. You are not such a thing.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 12:27 PM
4

Ah you aren't a feminist. Nevermind then, I'm not really concerned about your opinion about it then.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 11:59 AM
10

Within the context of discussion here - reddit - I'm not extrapolating. I'm stating fact. I'm sorry that you refuse to see the vast ugly side of feminism.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 11:26 AM
14

Says who? You? We get a constant stream of feminists. What gives you the right to claim your single opinion trounces so many?
/r/MensRights01/04/12 11:08 AM
23

No. I keep hearing that defense, but it's bullshit. For two years I've watched feminists coming here. What you think is a subset is the majority.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 10:43 AM
1

Doesn't seem like giving women increasingly less accountability would help.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 09:34 AM
27

Look at the context of what was written. It's talking about an actual topic - specifically how feminism dismisses ALL men's concerns with "whataboutthemenz" and the usual "men have such patriarchy privilege that WAAAHH if they complain" dismissals. That IS the problem with feminism - it's not just sometimes slow to address men's issues. It is actively hostile to them.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 09:21 AM
8

Well this is a great example of how it sometimes IS a zero-sum game.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 07:18 AM
2

Women don't have accountability. That's the primary issue here. She did it because she knows there aren't consequences to doing it.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:51 PM
7

No. Reverse the genders and you'd not have seen everyone just smiling and laughing while he freely beat her up in front of witnesses. Sorry - but no.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:50 PM
1

The men were in conflict. In one sense they probably wanted to help someone who was clearly being abused. In the other sense they know women have the power.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:48 PM
2

The hell is wrong with you? We are talking about how women can in front of witnesses get away with openly physically abusing men and he's screwed if he defends himself and he's humiliated if he doesn't. Then you come out with this line about "caring for children"? That has FUCK ALL to do with the thread's subject.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:47 PM
3

she knows she can get away with it. She can sort of get away with it. If she wails on him for ten minutes brutally - she might get in trouble. If he hits her back even once though, she's off the hook. She knows that and is trying to get him too - because then he's screwed. That's 'feminist equality'
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:38 PM
5

No. I'm bisexual and an ardent MRA. Gay men don't always come out and say it (ha, get it?) because they understand blowback (killing myself here..) but they aren't oblivious to the privileges women have in society.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:27 PM
4

What would you consider qualifying as a second class citizen? Shorter life span? Different treatment by the police? Reduced job opportunities?
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:20 PM
6

Botched, but could have been much worse. My mother said she regretted it. It was done for religious reasons and although I don't remember it she said the screaming got to her. I don't know what life would have been like otherwise. Would a girl who had her clitoris cut off know as well? She'd just think it normal sensation. Straight guys don't really look at other guy's cocks. So that's kind of a non-issue for them.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:16 PM
3

This is just the "turn it all up to 11" approach by feminists. You see waitressing is the "force women into subservience industry" Renaissance art depicting nude women was a "commercial rape industry" because at the time power structures could not have made her give true consent. Male gynecologists are in the "commercial violation industry" because as they are not women they are exploiting them. The template is simple: Take normal A and horrible B. Write A is a "commercial B industry"
/r/MensRights31/03/12 09:00 PM
-3

... and you just keep on going. Please take your victim-card playing and tone arguments elsewhere.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 02:07 AM
-4

It's very pejorative for you to dismiss me that way, one might say "rude." I'm not here to pander to a one-day old account repeating already debunked feminist dogma for the 100th time. It is incredibly rude of you to jump into it halfway. You jumped into someone else's conversation and when asked to leave you immediately started trying to play the emotionally wounded victim. This was a discussion between myself and Comeseibella. Get out. You haven't earned the right to interrupt us. You are bein…
/r/MensRights31/03/12 01:47 AM
3

Hiring quotas are legitimate because women have a different experience with education than men do. Yes. They vastly outnumber men in college and graduate in far greater numbers. Please stay out of this discussion.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:55 AM
4

I really respect everything that you have to say, and it's really encouraging me to think - which is great. Thank you. Uhm, okay. Great I guess. I'm not really big on needing approval or respect, but hey if it helps you in some manner and you prefer all the social graces present here then I suppose that's all good. Peggy McIntosh writes about White Privilege, and defines privilege as not something one should have to give up but rather, something that should be inherent for everyone. I don't have…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:21 PM
5

How it works: When men network with men: It's a "good ole boy network" and bad. When men network with women: It's a sign of how things are improving. When women network with men: It's a sign of the patriarchy. When women network with women: It's supporting your sisters and the very best thing in the entire world.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 10:16 PM
12

you must have had some really awful encounters with people who identify as feminists. Yes, every day here - and they refer to themselves as feminists too. This is what they are like - openly defending blatant double-standards against men, all the while claiming sexism against men cannot exist. I am completely serious about that. They claim it can't exist because sexism is only institutional power exercised against a group. To them it is literally impossible to be bigoted against men because we a…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 10:03 PM
34

No. We don't pretend to be a woman's movement.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 09:43 PM
24

Simple: Feminism is a woman's lobbying organization that only wears the facade of equality to get support.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 09:14 PM
14

You're wrong. It's a depressingly accurate summary of modern feminism. I'm sorry if you disagree with these, but they are representative of much of feminism and feminists don't seem to fight against them - so please don't think a "not all feminists are like that" argument is going to convince anyone. MRA's do not ally with feminists for quite a few reasons: Feminists have made it clear that feminism is a "safe space" for women where men are only barely tolerated. Men are told repeatedly not to b…
/r/MensRights30/03/12 09:12 PM
3

You've got to be trolling. Nobody is that fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:29 PM
2

Yeah, if women become the breadwinners and men stay at home and raise the children, then that whole "what about the person who sacrifices their career to raise the children" argument will vanish. Feminism is simply a political lobbying group for women. That's all.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:26 PM
17

As feminism doesn't actually do anything to help men unless it first helps womem, they are separate areas. You can be both up until certain issues come into conflict and then you'll have to resolve which one to support and which to oppose. So you can be, you just can't always be. It's like being both a skeptic and a christian. On many issues you might be able to be the same, but eventually you're going to have conflicting issues.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:22 PM
5

Not to be a naysayer here, because I'm not big on the emasculation of men, but... Anyone who has actually done a serious sweat in a sweat lodge knows it isn't some idle wussy thing. People can die doing that if they aren't careful.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 03:11 AM
1

That's a terrible article. Furthermore I kept expecting a description of "Marriage 3.0" that never came.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 08:12 PM
6

I think the virgin thing is different because of the procreation issues. A young virgin male doesn't have much status in the herd and his sperm isn't really much different from an older male. So go with the older one with herd ranking, it's better for your child. A young female's status is irrelevant, but a younger female is going to be a better breeder than an older female. So go with the younger female, it's better for your child. That's if you go evo-psych about it. You can also go simplistic…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:33 PM
4

A male who hasn't been able to have sex doesn't have sufficient power over woman. (Power in the sexual attractiveness sense)
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:16 PM
1

Yeah pretty much. Feminism has no specific meaning unless attacked, then it stands for everything good and right in the world and you are a bigot for attacking it. If feminism has to defend though, then it means "a diversity of opinions"
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:02 PM
11

I think those reasons are over-simplified. Like most humans, I think the truth is closer to "people want power over people who have power over people."
/r/MensRights29/03/12 05:58 PM
3

Yeah, we all got them at the "oppress all women" meeting. You might have missed them if you only went to the "make girls lack self-confidence" meeting
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:41 PM
1

I was leaving it opened ended enough to try to get some kind of response beyond a hollow "oh sure, we support..." Any response, really. It never came.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:39 AM
3

Aww come on. My post was: What exactly does that mean when you say you "support" mens rights? I mean other than saying so, what do you actually do? That isn't unclear. It's asking for the feminist to quantify and qualify - it is pretty clear I'm asking for them to back it up.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 05:23 AM
2

I'm saying I've constantly heard the term "feminists support equality for men too" - except they don't, not even once. Ask a feminist when ever in any circumstances EVER they've been willing to lose some privilege/advantage for women so that men might gain - in the interests of overall equality. There just isn't such a thing. No matter how many times I ask the question, the best they can ever come up with is "well, when it helped women too...."
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:48 AM
6

Not really no. If feminists were that diverse, there'd be no point in even using the term.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 03:39 AM
9

Aww is the poor wittle feminist upset that I pointed out how weak your post was? You aren't in a place that coddles the pathetic shit that passes for proof like you are used to in your feminist echo chamber. So go on. Make one more post after this and show how utterly clueless you are. Make it a good one! Then go ask your mom to wipe your ass. dahmc. 1 link karma, -20 comment karma Yeah. You're some badass!
/r/MensRights29/03/12 03:12 AM
13

Yawn. Like you're the first dumbass feminist coming here throwing out a single statistic as if it were some fucking golden magical sword. I'm just tired of such shitty opponents. You bore me. It's not even worth decimating your arguments anymore. Stay in school and try again later.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:38 AM
16

I swear you feminists just get stupider by the minute. One day I'd like you to send one with some sense here rather then the complete idiots like you. I'd like a real debate, not this retarded (as in the mentally disadvantaged) babbling people like you bring.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 02:04 AM
22

Yeah cuz the top 0.000001% of men are completely indicative of what the other 99.999999% of the others go through! All men everywhere are always the 1%!
/r/MensRights29/03/12 01:58 AM
4

Let me make this clear. I consider SRS posters to be trolls who only come here to disrupt. You're hypocrites, assholes, and liars. Your mods are ban-happy and you have no interest in actual debate. Your "discussion reddit" is a joke where you ban any dissent. So then you go to other reddits to shit all over them and try to make as big a scene as you can. So no - I won't play your troll games. Fuck off SRS troll.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 01:06 AM
1

lol fuck off SRS troll.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:48 AM
4

lol fuck off SRS troll.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:30 AM
11

The military really is a tough one for feminists isn't it? They want women to be able to serve in combat! Strong powerful women! ... uh... but women shouldn't be drafted, because.. war is bad and stuff. Women suffer the most in wars! ... uh... because men die a lot in them and women lose their husbands and sons... Soldiers sure are the image of strong, determined, and powerful... just like we want women to be! .. uh... except not men though, because that's bad... Feminism's cognitive dissonance …
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:15 AM
28

I think that author still missing a major point. Men are put in front of a brick wall and told "get to the other side - don't be lazy!" Women are put on conveyor belt people-movers and told "you don't have to stand on it. you can walk the opposite direction - do whatever you like!" The author is missing that boys are intentionally hobbled and crippled by the almost entirely female dominated pro-girl's educational system. By the time they reached legal age they've spent most of their lives in it …
/r/MensRights29/03/12 12:06 AM
2

I have no idea what you are talking about. I've been posting here for two years and haven't seen the least bit of censorship of mra's. I'm openly an asshole to people I think deserve it and I've never supported banning even misandrists. The only bans I support are for spamming, open trolling (not disagreements), and the cp stuff. This is an open forum. Let people act like idiots and the readers know what idiots are. Out the trolls. Out the SRS saboteurs. Out the false-flag raisers. We win by tru…
/r/MensRights28/03/12 08:22 PM
2

I'm very anti-banning. I only sort of support it for blatant spammers and trolls. If someone is just concern trolling or too stupid to understand why a post was made here - then we just out them as the troll or idiot they are and move on. It isn't a bad thing to grind them into the dirt - to show readers what they are.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 08:09 PM
2

Not going to lie. I didn't read all that crap. You've already shown yourself to be oblivious and even your attempt at linking to other posts failed utterly. So I'm just going to assume you repeated the same crap you did before, still aren't getting it - and are probably storming off in a huffy rage knowing you lost this round but your fragile poor little ego is too weak to admit it. Here's an idea though - next time just keep your mouth shut if you are too stupid to understand why a link was pos…
/r/MensRights28/03/12 08:06 PM
-5

Moms, feminists, and women - don't change their minds easily. All you can really do is just avoid them for a while until they start to get lonely and realize that they have to try to get along with other people too.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 07:59 PM
2

Hahaha lol you're so reaching it's awesome in a pat you on the head kind of way. Not a one of those is a "why is this in men's rights?" post. That's just you. That's all YOU. Now run on home little guy. Big people are talking.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 07:57 PM
3

Hey keep kidding yourself. Notice how you're the only person in this thread who just doesn't get it though? Nah, probably not. Thick-headed idiots like you never do. Just keep telling yourself you are a special snowflake.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 07:41 PM
2

lol Keep trying kid. Your ignorance and obliviousness is sort of fun to watch.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 07:24 PM
2

If you don't see how discussing double-standards is related to men's rights, then don't blame others for your failure. Just stay away and don't post until you figure it out.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 07:17 PM
1

Oh look a shithead projecting their own misogyny onto others. Are you an SRS sockpuppet? Or are you just stupid as fuck all on your own?
/r/MensRights28/03/12 07:10 PM
2

Would you switch places with her?
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:58 PM
2

That shit is like saying cleaning out your car makes living easier and decreases stress levels. Yeah, maybe - but don't pretend it's a fucking career to clean out your car.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:10 PM
6

"Why is this in men's rights?" == the new troll's cry.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:05 PM
22

So you're admitting that feminism is a women's lobbying organization NOT an equality movement?
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:04 PM
9

What exactly does that mean when you say you "support" mens rights? I mean other than saying so, what do you actually do?
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:03 PM
2

Troll force... ASSEMBLE!
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:50 AM
3

Troll force... ASSEMBLE!
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:50 AM
1

You're clearly new. So very new in fact that your very first post was to crudely demand answers! I'm going to wait until you have 1000 karma before I even consider replying to you. Until then, you must listen.. and learn... and educate yourself! Only then will you be ready to ask that question and possibly be able to receive the answer! Go forth child! Quest for that karma and return here for your reward when you are done! Your journey begins.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:38 AM
1

Oh poor you? You decided to "SOURCE PLEASE" troll me first. I gave you (cleanly and politely) the source you requested. Then you decided to play all your games with it. So don't pretend you are some poor damsel in distress going "oh I don't want to argue." YOU started arguing. YOU demanded references. YOU haven't made any references of your own. YOU are the one who started and perpetuated all of this. Are you so used to having people just put up with your crap that you don't see that? Or are you…
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:52 AM
1

The only thing you've proven is that you are utterly incapable of doing research, basic reading comprehension, or even google usage. You're just trolling here. I keep giving you everything you ask for and you just keep playing the "oh golly gee I'm useless" card. You meanwhile haven't posted a single link or actual counter-argument other than complaining you aren't being coddled while attacking people giving you the very references you demand with such entitlement.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:40 AM
1

The heck is wrong with you? First you ask for a source, I get you one. Then you say that's just wikipedia and there's no reference - so I get you the reference, from wikipedia. Then you say you can't find the article... and I found it in all of 30 seconds with two simple searches - http://aler.oxfordjournals.org/content/2/1/126.abstract?sid=a28a156c-33ad-4e3e-8fba-724a25ac9559 You need to stop asking people to cite sources if you are going to be purposely ineffective. I really think you are just…
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:36 AM
1

Are you high? It was reference 69 - ^ Brinig, Margaret; Douglas W. Allen (2000). "These Boots Are Made for Walking: Why Most Divorce Filers are Women". American Law and Economics Review 2 (1): 126–129.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:14 AM
6

Trololololooooooooool
/r/MensRights28/03/12 03:23 AM
-4

I decided not to insult cunts by calling you one.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 03:22 AM
5

I gave a reference. Don't like it? Get your own or fuck off.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 02:54 AM
4

StephenMurphySr - 4 hours old, -41 comment karma. All their posts were to /mensrights. All their posts were idiotic. All their posts were stupid misportraying of gender issues. 99.8% chance of SRS sockpuppet. What's the matter? You scared to post on your actual account? Awwww.... that's cute!
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:55 AM
40

Don't worry. When you group up you stop caring so much about seeming "normal" You'll get there.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:54 AM
3

There is some variation among states, and the numbers have also varied over time, with about 60% of filings by women in most of the 19th century, and over 70% by women in some states just after no-fault divorce was introduced, according to the paper. Evidence is given that among college-educated couples, the percentages of divorces initiated by women is approximately 90%. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:49 AM
7

Awww. You're a cute lil bigot.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:47 AM
26

I'm going to have to disagree with you there. Passively reading a pulpy romance novel is a lot more like porn watching than someone playing a puzzle-solving game, builder game (minecraft), or even tactics game.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 12:01 AM
13

I guess they had to leave off the uncomfortable truth. "It's not him. It's YOU." Let's not forget that women initiate 3/4ths of the divorces. Commitment-phobic indeed.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:24 PM
8

You are confusing downvoting stupid trolly shit with dissenting opinion. It's clear your entire agenda here is to attack the MRM instead of discuss the issue. I wonder if you know that and are just trolling - or if you really think somewhere in your smug entitled brain that you aren't.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:17 PM
3

In fairness, if people were to just "be themselves", they'd never improve.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:14 PM
13

I'm talking about sex and gender issues. You're the one clearly with an anti-mra agenda. Perhaps you need to take a step back, re-examine your personal vendetta - then rejoin the discussion when you are able to talk about the issue itself instead of derailing with snide little attacks against the MRM.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:05 PM
21

Probably because it's actually a hard question and not easily answered with a fluff piece of tripe like that article. If she'd tried to answer it - she'd either have to face the real issues the article rose rather than the simplistic repetition of the played out "amazing woman vs lazy man" narrative she was just latching onto. That or everyone would call horse-shit on her when she tried to say that it hadn't.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 09:28 PM
39

"Learn to google, dipshit" That's rich. You demand a citation, but when people ask you for one, your response is "google, dipshit" Well, to your request for citation then... "google, dipshit!"
/r/MensRights27/03/12 08:24 PM
4

It's depressing how a simple "the accused should have rights" statement is so shockingly different from the norm.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 07:34 PM
48

Yeah, nice spin with "Women, especially minority women, are pursuing higher education at much greater rates than men." See, women are in the majority because they "pursue higher education". yet if men are in the lead somewhere it's because of a systematic oppression of women to keep them out.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 07:03 PM
23

the perils of taller women and dating? Citation please.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 07:01 PM
3

So if a woman gets thrown out of her house, all she has to do is scream into the phone and the cops will come kill him for her. Good to know.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 06:39 PM
8

I found the article a bit slanted because it was "ezine4males" So I dug up some other articles about it. It is interesting to see how everyone spins it differently - although it is obvious she's having problems overall. http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-03-26/gillard-party-support-slumps-to-near-record-low-poll-shows http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/queenslands-labor-party-in-crisis/story-fn7x8me2-1226309747283 http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/elections/julia-gillar…
/r/MensRights27/03/12 06:37 PM
6

I love how from one side men are told they are excessively macho and never admit when they are hurt and that's why we die earlier.. then on the other hand we are told we are just hypochondriacs.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 05:26 PM
71

Has women’s success come at the expense of men? I’m not about to argue that. Oh, well thanks for dodging the real question.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 05:21 PM
28

This is why no amount of male domination will ever be enough, why no level of control or privilege or female submission will ever satisfy us. We can put you under a burqa, we can force you out of the workplace -- it won't matter. In the end the author reveals themselves as just another feminist ideologue.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 04:39 PM
4

Yeah, GEE. 2 posts ever? Where ever did I get the impression that you were an SRSr and are just outright lying about 2 posts ever? Wait.. I know! http://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/comments/qa9zc/on_dating_have_you_tried_using_a_cheat_code_that/c3wke9h http://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/comments/r5tg6/sedditor_flat_out_admits_to_raping_a_high_school/c434qin http://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/comments/r5tg6/sedditor_flat_out_admits_to_raping_a_high_school/c43axz4 http://www.reddit.com…
/r/MensRights26/03/12 11:13 PM
5

Coming from an SRS member I have to laugh at that. How is thing over in your 'ben'-happy land anyway? Still getting rid of all those nasty dissenters by copious bannings?
/r/MensRights26/03/12 10:52 PM
12

That's an interesting way of admitting that being cultured isn't challenging but being a scientist is.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 10:21 PM
6

I was about to keep debating this, but then I recognized the stink of an argumentative troll and checked your post history. Discussion with you is useless.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 05:25 PM
6

So what's your point here - you think guys going through puberty is a fucking breeze?
/r/MensRights26/03/12 04:37 PM
9

What's sad is I can kind of sympathize. My ludicrous over the top sarcasm is actually exactly what many feminists sound like.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 04:36 PM
17

She was raped though and for her healing to begin someone had to be sent to prison! Why are you so focused on the innocent guy who had to spend 17 years in prison? Don't you get that he was helping her? Why do you hate women so much! Stop with the "what about the menz!"
/r/MensRights26/03/12 08:32 AM
5

Wow... first he was fucked by feminists and patriarchy.. then he was fucked by patriarchy... then he was fucked by feminists and patriarchy!
/r/MensRights26/03/12 08:30 AM
4

Well obviously how it works is that men turn to drugs because they are lazy slacker evil bastard criminals with supportive wives who treat them awesomely.. but women turn to drugs because they are poor victims just trying to cope with how horrible their husband is and the patriarchy that oppresses her! So now the patriarchy is going to treat her extra special, because somehow that means it's privilege for men sinc... No. Just no. No sane person can possibly believe that shit. Feminism is a fucki…
/r/MensRights26/03/12 07:51 AM
10

I just mean that it's depressing when you think about it... because it means a lot of time has passed since then and things have become even worse.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 07:22 AM
3

I suppose there is truth in that. I can't really think of a bigger insult or shame than to be called an SRS poster.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 06:49 AM
0

Your line of trying to cut down on the adversarial nature of things already fell apart? That was quick.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 06:39 AM
13

Yeah, the thing where democrats are trying to frame things like VAWA as "If you don't support this bill then you are misogynists who hate women" - that doesn't exactly endear me to left-wing politics either.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 06:35 AM
4

Interesting. You know who else is vehemently pushing that view? One guess...
/r/MensRights26/03/12 06:33 AM
2

No it doesn't. Saying something "sucks" means it removes the good of something, not that it's related to oral intercourse. It's like saying "that sucks <the fun out of>"
/r/MensRights26/03/12 06:26 AM
4

NALALT "Not all leftists are like that" Which is ironic, because I'm not really political. What I see is conservatives shitting all over everybody and liberals shitting all over men to hand everything over to women. Which is worse? Well they both suck (in the "removes good" sense not the leftist politically-incorrect assumption about oral and phalluses sense!), but I'm going to go with leftists, because frankly - at least the conservatives are being gender blind.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 06:15 AM
9

Sort of depressing how the news about how much advantage women/girls have tends to be old news.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 05:56 AM
28

Don't you know anything we say that isn't feminist-friendly is misogyny? Science is either progressive or misogynistic, depending on politics.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 05:36 AM
55

So much for that feminist narrative of "women's self-confidence is crushed at an early age."
/r/MensRights26/03/12 04:57 AM
22

Yeah I can see how the propaganda will play out on that already "Why do women get so much more support when homeless?" "Well they aren't abusing drugs as much as men." "How do you know?" "Because our drug testing of men shows many homeless men abuse drugs!" "Do you test the women?" "No, that'd be sexist."
/r/MensRights26/03/12 03:58 AM
6

Misogynists in the men’s and fathers’ rights movements have developed a set of Really? Just had to throw that in there right off huh? Couldn't let the facts stand on their own?
/r/MensRights26/03/12 03:02 AM
8

I think that author is ignoring the most salient and relevant point: PUA is for men who couldn't get women. MensRights is for men who did.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 01:31 AM
2

I haven't seen it, but I get the marketing hype around it is obnoxious.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 01:12 AM
21

That means fuck-all. It's the same shitty excuse for women not being eligible for the draft. "Nobody should... but we'll exempt women anyway" is a lame cop-out that ignores that if you want to fix a shitty law, then apply it equally and often.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 01:07 AM
-4

I'm not a trans ally. I'm a men's ally. Women have plenty of supporters and groups already. If they were FtM we'd be more supportive. We aren't a group fighting for women's privilege though. There's a massive overpowering infrastructure doing that already.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 11:34 PM
2

Alright SRS. Am I allowed to find her attractive, or is that being sexist? Why the hypocrisy here though? When we say "women should be drafted too", we get told it doesn't matter because we should end wars. So why is it when it's a beauty pageant, we aren't hearing "this doesn't matter because we should end beauty pageants?"... aren't they just more objectification of the type the politically correct rage against?
/r/MensRights25/03/12 11:28 PM
3

It's the natural evolution of scuzzy politics. "You oppose this new bill that gets rid of due process? You must be a misogynist that hates innocent women!" "You oppose the DMCA? You must want to steal food from baby's mouths!" "You think the order to militarize all civilian homes is excessive? Why do you hate freedom?"
/r/MensRights25/03/12 11:25 PM
2

Clearly, men are violent because they hate women and want to make their grandmothers, mothers, wives, daughters, nieces, and aunts into abused slaves. What else could it be! Come on - that author was legit!
/r/MensRights25/03/12 10:04 PM
1

"Plenty" is a weasel word. 10 out of 10 million can be "plenty" Feminism as a majority works against the rights of women to work in prostitution and pornography.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 09:38 PM
15

1 - First look at: A man that hits a woman is not a man. A woman that hits a man is not a woman. 2 - Now add "back" to both. A man that hits a woman back is not a man. A woman that hits a man back is not a woman. Notice how subtly it changes from 1 and 2 and the reactions that would induce.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 05:18 AM
1

Well... then.. Get the fuck out?
/r/MensRights25/03/12 05:14 AM
1

You've got some serious issues, you know that? Go get some help. We can try a discussion later.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 04:38 AM
1

Did you really just invoke Godwin's Law? Oh GTFO kid.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 04:19 AM
0

Anti-women crusaders? Nice attempt to mis-frame the argument there chum. I think the correct analogy is "The wage gap is much like the theory of intelligent design. They want it to be true and rather than use actual science and statistics, they just repeat it on faith."
/r/MensRights25/03/12 03:51 AM
3

Hmm, on that topic I don't know the answer - how the evidence was allowed it if it wasn't legal to record. Obviously better to get in trouble for recording than be unable to prove innocence, but still..
/r/MensRights25/03/12 03:12 AM
9

We've seen plenty of articles where the only thing that saved the guy from ten years of being raped in prison was a bit of video evidence showing that her accusation was a fabrication. Sorry women, but it is simply prudent and wise to record this stuff.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 01:47 AM
2

SRS are trolls. That's their mission. Here we just out them, downvote them, and move on. That's what you do with trolls.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 12:47 AM
16

Isn't that what is already happening? As men opt-out of marriage... as they increasingly say "noooo..." to being cuckolded, spermjacked, and manipulated into impregnation... as they turn to porn as being more satisfying emotionally and physically than actual women have become.. as they decide that if women need men like fish need a bicycle, then men need women like a bank needs a bank robber - aren't men jacking up the price of sperm? Make no mistake though, it isn't really about the sperm. It i…
/r/MensRights25/03/12 12:26 AM
4

Yeah, it's amusing to watch their doublespeak there. "It isn't a zero sum game, but women need more advantages to balance things out"
/r/MensRights24/03/12 11:57 PM
0

Women-Not paid as much as men, even if as good, Less opportunities in politics and business, etc... This is a thoroughly debunked piece of feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 11:54 PM
3

Oh don't worry, I'm sure since feminism is "about helping men too", they'll be along any moment to speak out against this physical objectification of men. Any day now... yep...
/r/MensRights24/03/12 10:56 PM
17

Amazing isn't it? To help this kid get over feminist indoctrination you'd have to apply the same techniques used to deprogram a cult member. That's not really coincidence.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 10:29 PM
6

The most patronizing self-indulgent type of "man up" is when women do it.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 08:50 AM
3

Just because some of you don't get it. This has to do with men's rights for the same reason articles about women raping men do - it serves as examples of how wrong it is when people try to claim women don't rape and women don't molest children.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 07:24 AM
13

They want wikipedia made more feminist? That's sort of like pouring a lake into a swimming pool.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 04:40 AM
5

Could you explain there? It seems like blatant sexual discrimination against men. So if you object to our view of that - could you explain what the yardstick is? Why the context is different?
/r/MensRights24/03/12 01:33 AM
5

How it works: Oh! It's just whoever asks first is the one who should pay. ... but men should really be the ones asking first. Women like to be pursued!
/r/MensRights24/03/12 12:15 AM
16

This is exactly why articles about women falsely claiming rape are relevant to men's rights. If feminists stopped with the ludicrous assertions that women don't falsely claim rape - then those articles would become irrelevant.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 11:08 PM
6

How it works: Hurts women : "This issue affects us ALL!!! We're in this together!" Hurts men : "Shut up and stop with the whataboutthemenz"
/r/MensRights23/03/12 09:43 AM
2

Alright. I'm trying to do a new thing where I give people a chance to explain before I just tell them they are wrong. What are these spaces women were required to be at that men weren't allowed at?
/r/MensRights23/03/12 03:50 AM
16

Womankind welcomes work in mobilising men and boys towards gender equality – yet much of the focus so far has been around addressing men’s violent behaviour and promoting change in their personal relationships. Evaluation of such programmes targeting men too often relies on self-reporting, rather than also consulting with women about the changes in men’s behaviour. Someone doesn't get it.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 02:24 AM
3

http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3ofi9o/
/r/MensRights23/03/12 12:27 AM
8

So if a woman buys a guy a drink - she's a rapist? Got it. I'll remember that.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 10:47 PM
11

Well, sort of. Women always had women-only spaces. What they wanted was access to everywhere while still keeping women-only spaces.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 10:38 PM
7

Can you imagine the same from China? "It's social and cultural tradition to kill abnormal children. We are just making it official now."
/r/MensRights22/03/12 08:29 PM
23

That is a strange argument from them. "This isn't discrimination except for the discrimination we've had before and we are perpetuating in new areas."
/r/MensRights22/03/12 05:05 PM
1

So you are trying to claim you are a black male in /r/mensrights who thinks women have it worse. This is the part where I start to get skeptical of your claims and reasons for being here.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 04:21 AM
3

Your people? Are you not male?
/r/MensRights22/03/12 04:10 AM
3

Step 1. Make some colleges do it. Step 2. Make all colleges do it. Step 3. Make some states do it. Step 4. Make all states do it. That's their agenda.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 03:39 AM
2

I'm sorry, and I don't mean this as an ad hominem. I mean it simply as it is - you're too dumb to talk to. You just lack basic cognitive reasoning.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 02:42 AM
3

Just little things like life span, incarceration, violent deaths, welfare, and child custody.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 12:23 AM
3

Except black men have it worse than black women.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 12:03 AM
3

Who has it worse? A black man or a black woman? Realize that racism can't be what makes one have it worse than the other.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 09:39 PM
5

2X really is pretty level-headed and a good reminder that feminism is our enemy not women. Sure, there's a lot of self-interest if women want alimony fixed because they are going to be affected by it, but... There's no better way to fix a bad law than to apply it equally and fully.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 05:27 PM
9

In some areas, that is known as "talking points"
/r/MensRights21/03/12 09:58 AM
1

Well yeah. Wired isn't in Seattle, there is no ninth circuit court, Seattle has Microsoft instead, and San Francisco has a lot more hippies while Seattle has a lot more hipsters.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 05:08 AM
4

You've definitely confused stereotyping and describing.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 04:43 AM
8

Stereotype? I've spent time in San Francisco. It isn't a stereotype anymore than Seattle having a lot of rain, starbucks, and Microsoft folk is.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 04:31 AM
2

Well something you should know about me is that I don't think the MRM will ever find legitimacy, but it doesn't have to. If we are the ones who push things. If we expand the range of what men are allowed to talk about and want addressed, then we make it so the average everyday man who might never have anything to do with the MRM is more normalized. Feminists do the same, it is the entire point of radical feminism. It lets the less radical feminists seem almost downright sane when they say misand…
/r/MensRights21/03/12 03:41 AM
7

Men were never attracted to "opinionated" women. That was a hollywood myth. Neither gender wants an asshole as a mate. People should have opinions, but being opinionated is a vice not a virtue. Guys want what they always wanted - a loyal sweet mate. We generally don't need or want a "provider". We want someone we can give to and not get screwed over by, not have our favorite flower turn into a poisonous thorn. Men will adapt to one-sided alimony. Men will adapt to rampant and rising divorce. Men…
/r/MensRights21/03/12 12:15 AM
8

You mean the link that is sitting at 0?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 11:33 PM
25

Not only that but we weighed in on the issue and made a specific exception to our generally ridiculously open free speech policy here - to explicitly ban not just CP but even nambla-type advocacy. To imply as that author did is to just intentionally misrepresent. It's bad journalism, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 11:33 PM
0

Do you read your own posts? Or do you just write them and ignore your own advice?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 11:15 PM
7

Of course, like any site that thrives on pseudonymity, Reddit attracts its share of the sick and the deluded. There’s a subreddit, MensRights, “for people who believe that men are currently being disadvantaged by society," ... probably because Wired is basically just an Apple shill run by San Francisco liberals who have been raised in surroundings so utterly feminist that when I say "ninth circuit court", everybody giggles a little bit.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 10:50 PM
1

I gave reasons too, and you ignored them. So don't go thinking you took the high road, chum. Just what the fuck are you doing in this thread anyway if you don't find it relevant? Get out? Go post in threads you do think are relevant instead of arguing about how little this one matters?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 09:18 PM
2

Look. I cited the reasons. I cited the faq. You don't want to admit you're wrong. I get that. Being anti-feminist has nothing to do with it. You just don't want to admit that your initial rant was off-base. THAT is why you refuse to see how it is related. It is clear that many mra's here DO see how it relates. You don't? That's fine. Get the fuck out of the thread then. You don't need to be here then.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 09:02 PM
7

Alright, it's clear you are being intentionally obtuse here and no amount of evidence or logic will help you understand. Let's just drop it then.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:46 PM
4

Hey no need to cry over it ;) "I'll post whatever I damn well please!"
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:35 PM
8

Please read the FAQ - specifically Section 1.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:34 PM
3

Of course not. These people posting "why is this here" aren't even mra's.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:31 PM
2

Right back at you bro. Please see Section 1 of the FAQ
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:31 PM
6

You really don't get it, do you?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:30 PM
4

He's slut shaming.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:08 PM
3

Okay, you still don't get it and increasingly I see that you don't want to. It is relevant to men's rights though even if you don't understand why.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:07 PM
0

As a bit of general advice: if you are in a strange place where you are kind of out of your depth, then it's better to ask questions first and speak second. A meme for you.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 08:06 PM
11

Consider what would have happened if there was a DNA database that traced it to that man's sperm too. You think she would have come forward with "the truth"? You think he'd have been given a fair trial? You think even if he were exonerated later, his reputation as a murdering rapist wouldn't linger? This is absolutely related to men's rights.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:51 PM
2

Done
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:47 PM
2

We agree there.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:42 PM
2

You don't see the connection, that's fine. A lot of us do though. So don't presume to think that your ignorance and inability to see patterns applies to the entire reddit. It is a clear case of a woman using anti-male bias and rape hysteria to try to cover up her crimes. It is the same as blaming crimes on "a large black male" because it's just easy to throw people off the scent that way. Then men get made to look like rapists, she'd get a free pass (if not caught), and the "rape statistics" are…
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:41 PM
-5

I'm always amazed by you people who never post here except on the rare occasion when you come here to act like you have any clue what discussions here are about or why certain stories are linked. Don't say "this isn't mensrights material" if you aren't really a poster here.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:37 PM
11

Not really. If you saw a white person commit a crime and then try to blame it on "a tall black man" did it... you'd think that was kind of racist right? So if you saw a woman murder someone and then try to blame it on "a rapist male"... I'd hope you'd think that was kind of sexist.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:35 PM
5

Like this
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:34 PM
4

What is this "this is not a" crap from you? That's your first post here ever. You don't speak for us. Why is it in men's rights? Do you really want to know instead of going on a rant? To fight against the narrative that women don't do this - that women don't lie about rape, that women don't frame people for rape. You're new here. I get that. You should listen and learn before trying to tell us what is and isn't relevant. Read some of the criticisms we get - there really are people out there who …
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:29 PM
7

Get an air conditioner. The problem isn't the dress code it's your HVAC unit.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:26 PM
2

Yes
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:02 PM
4

Ask a black guy what he'd have done if a white guy had done similar. That's basically how you get advice on dealing with women these days.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 05:26 PM
5

I like that top rated comment. Whenever someone says "I'm a lawyer" and then proceeds to explain some legal stuff to you - I always look for "This is not intended as legal advice" to be included. If it isn't there, I know it's fake.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:20 AM
2

Except I don't really go to feminist reddits. They come here, looking for a fight. They want to be upset.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 01:26 AM
10

Hey don't go insulting apes by comparing them to SRS.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 01:02 AM
5

The problem is when we try to (like here) we get: Attacked for being "misogynists" Told we should just be feminists... ??? Shamed for complaining ("man up!") If we try to work with women, our concerns are dismissed as doing "whataboutthemenz" So we gave up on trying to work with women on men's issues. They don't care and there's a limit to how much society can address at once. At some point it is fair to say "look, women have been getting the lion's share. We'd at least like some scraps"
/r/MensRights20/03/12 12:54 AM
2

Ignoring it is a big part of it, but not all of it. For example - if insurance pays for women's birth control, that cost is picked up by both genders. If single mothers receive tax breaks, and special programs - both genders still pay for that. Whenever you give special treatment to women paid for by taxes/society/insurance/etc - men are paying for half (or more) of that cost. Another example is all the activism about breast cancer even though right now prostate cancer is a far bigger threat. At…
/r/MensRights20/03/12 12:49 AM
2

Well sure, but I'm going to call bullshit on it because it's propaganda not truth. Perhaps when I see feminists fighting religious oppression for both genders (where are the feminists that oppose male genital mutilation?) I'll give them some credit. Until then they are just throwing men to the wolves to get their piece.. and it's why we need a men's rights movement - because feminism isn't helping us and often actively works against us.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 12:42 AM
5

I'm actual pro-abortion, myself. Yet I recognize that it is still a wildly polarizing debate. It isn't as simple as saying "if you oppose abortion then you are oppressing women". Only the pro-abortion side says that. The anti-abortion side says "if you support abortion then you are killing baby girls". It's all just rhetoric and I don't buy it as a "war on women" I do agree though that the religious situation is completely out of control. You see it with birth control, you see it with circumcisi…
/r/MensRights20/03/12 12:37 AM
16

Really? When religion says the use of birth control/abortion is wrong - it's a war on women and one side is pure evil? When religion says male infant genital mutilation is fine - it's religious freedom and men are just whining? Is that how that works? The abortion debate is not even remotely resolved. Trying to frame the issue as evil patriarchy vs oppressed women is just, to be blunt, lame. The contraceptive debate is whether insurance should pay for it.. and why should it? Why shouldn't people…
/r/MensRights20/03/12 12:03 AM
11

Well we've been trying to get mandatory paternity testing of children - particularly when the claim is made that a certain man is the father. Yet that gets called a "war on women" by prominent feminists. So don't pretend the two things aren't related. Also stop trying to conflate the abortion debate into a one-sided "it is oppression against women" thing. It is vastly more complex than that. Trying to say that "side <x> is right and side <y> is an evil oppressor." is advocating one side of it. M…
/r/MensRights19/03/12 11:57 PM
5

I agree that there is a war on civil liberties. No argument there. It isn't a war on women though, it is a war on the 99%.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 11:23 PM
12

One does have to ask. If there is a War on Women, what right should they get that they don't already have? ... none really. If not a right, what law treats women worse? ... none really. If not a law, then perhaps women are dying before men? ... nope Then what? What exactly is expected to stop this "war"? There just isn't a right women are missing. There just isn't a law missing. There just isn't women dying in greater numbers or quicker than men! What war?
/r/MensRights19/03/12 11:11 PM
6

Did you read the article? It is directly related to divorce issues. If she's been taking the money (say by buying items then selling them to generate cash either for drugs or to stash somewhere) - and they get a divorce, then he's on the hook for both the debt and alimony. So the issue of a wife (since divorce is such a gendered issue) racking up massive bills right before a potential divorce is very much related to men's rights.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 11:01 PM
6

I'm always amazed when women say things that would get them banned from /SRS for being anti-women.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:42 PM
28

Feminists try to paint MRA's as throwbacks - people who want to get back the power they lost... which simply shows how oblivious feminists have become. We never had that "power". We've never known such a world. All we've known is being raised in a K12 school system that favored girls and treated us like criminals. If we were luckier than most (and statistically rarer than girls) we went to college and saw the anti-male bias absolutely explode further. We dated and saw who women really went for a…
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:36 AM
2

I always just sort of accepted that the world as we know it is always ending. There's always some new world coming along and what we were used to and comfortable with was going away.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:22 AM
1

Not from /SRS - then you got it! See: http://www.usatoday.com/money/workplace/2010-09-01-single-women_N.htm
/r/MensRights19/03/12 08:11 AM
2

I think to say "not that's not MGTOW" you need to define it a bit further. Rejecting women -as a lifestyle- seems pretty MGTOW.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 04:19 AM
2

Dear /SRS troll. I know you don't really want the answer to that question and even if it were explained utterly and completely to you - you'd still refuse to see it. I could explain how if a man said such things - he'd be called misogynistic. Except it was a woman who wrote the article. I could explain how it relates to hypergamy and how that's related to men's rights too. I know though you consider terms like hypergamy and misandry as offensive to your /SRS sensibilities though. I could point o…
/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:47 PM
15

In fairness, girls were involved and so the right thing to do is to kill everyone but the women and sort it out later.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 09:51 PM
10

We see that type of "equality" applied here a lot and it's becoming a problem. How it works is: Women see an area where men have a perceived advantage. They lobby and get a law passed saying women have to be equally represented there. They do not make it so men have to be equally represented there. So then you get situations like I mentioned where in U.S. metropolitan areas women out-earn men. You also get situations like where women out-number men in college and graduation too. Equality would b…
/r/MensRights18/03/12 09:44 PM
9

that doesn't mean you can get outraged at people being paid the same, regardless of gender. You can if it isn't bidirectional. Is there a guarantee that men will be paid the same too? Remember - in U.S. metropolitan areas - women out-earn men.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 09:32 PM
5

Oh right, because women everywhere are totally fine with men who have long hair, massive beards, and hair all over. ... but if it's women... then suddenly it's "a form of oppression based on a beauty norm and controlling the female body"
/r/MensRights18/03/12 09:28 PM
3

I hope people get the "hot adult teacher" irony in your post.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 09:17 AM
1

If you want to nitpick, then two negatives is a positive. More importantly though there was no negative in Newspeak at all. It was only double plus and good/ungood.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 04:38 AM
2

Of course.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 10:39 PM
11

I'm curious, because there's no one except the extreme radical feminists who would try to claim there aren't radical anti-male feminist groups and sites out there. Has the SPLC ever spoken out against openly anti-male radical feminism anywhere ever? There's been plenty examples of radical feminists advocating gendercide, murder, mutilation - it seems exactly the sort of thing the SPLC should be giving "warnings" out about right?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 08:34 PM
0

I dont need to do shit for obvious troll alt accounts.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 04:38 AM
5

I'm anti-violence too. That doesn't mean I'm a pacifist. I just believe that a great way to get someone to stop hitting you is to hit them back and have them realize you aren't defenseless.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:25 AM
2

sorry but I don't play no true scotsman with troll accounts.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:17 AM
4

number1dilbertfan: 1 link karma, 0 comment karma, redditor for 8 minutes
/r/MensRights17/03/12 03:03 AM
2

Yeah I get it. If she's beating the crap out of him, eh... whatever... why hold her accountable, why fix the DV laws... .. but if he should dare to hit her, that's basically satan and hitler.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 02:49 AM
8

Feminists refer to this as cougaring. They use the usual argument - it isn't the same because women molesting boys doesn't come from a "abuse of power" position (nevermind that it's often female teachers) but men molesting girls is patriarchy and all that jazz so it's worse.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 02:02 AM
8

Well, consider what you want from her too. Surely you have reasons as well to consider marrying or having children? The problem is even if you do, when you look at the fact she can simply get pregnant, divorce you, and be entitled to the alimony and child support - locking you out of involvement with your own children if she wants/by moving elsewhere... then even if your motivation is having children and you'd ask nothing else of her - it's still an unwise move on your part to pursue it. In MRA …
/r/MensRights17/03/12 12:59 AM
18

You are worried about being financially and socially objectified. Women don't want to be sexually objectified (all the time) right? They want to be respected for who they are as a person and a unique individual? Well, no guy wants to feel like a woman is only after him because she wants a baby-support system. He wants her to want him for him. So ask yourself that - are they interested in you or in the lifestyle and child they want?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 12:38 AM
7

You're... advocating that people who are suffering from domestic violence abuse should just take it? That's pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 12:26 AM
2

Good stuff and good work.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 10:04 PM
5

i.e... "Why do we say men have privilege?" ".. because our tenured female professor in the women's studies class said so without restraint or opposition at our college paid for by the alimony/child support from a man whose ex-wife divorced him and raised her as a single mother with our taxes giving special assistance said so, and the women in metropolitan areas who now make more than men agreed! Also the media who targets women because they control 80% of buying power said so as well! Only an ea…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 09:33 PM
22

Basically, yeah that's the hypocrisy there. "Let's play oppression olympics! .. wait you are winning the arguments. Don't play oppression olympics! OPRESSION OLYMPICS ARE BAD!"
/r/MensRights16/03/12 08:26 PM
12

Hmm, do you have a link to that? It sounds like one of those pseudo-science arbitrary pulled-out-of-ass things than any sort of real research.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:47 PM
33

This is why feminists will refuse to quantify privilege. If there was an actual measure, some metric to use - not only would it be shown that women actually have more privilege... but feminist dogma would put into an even more precarious position. Women are gaining ever more power. So how much more power would there need to be before even someone who thought women needed more power would say "okay now it's even" or "okay women have more power now" Feminists can't allow that possibility to happen…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:12 PM
80

How it works: If women call men out on bad behavior - that's "fighting patriarchy" If men call women out on bad behavior - that's misogyny.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:07 PM
9

I think he communicated it extremely effectively. It was very clear why he said what he did and that it was because of her own actions. The worst thing he did was to treat her exactly as she treated him. The issue isn't communication - she understood completely, I'm sure. What you are talking about is how she should have the right to be an asshole without being treated the same way. Remember the golden rule here. This is all kindergarden 101 stuff - negative reinforcement for bad behavior.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:04 PM
9

Why do you assume that she'd see it as an MRA thing? Did you see her saying "no thanks" as her promoting feminism? I doubt it. This is just an example of how we give women a pass on bad behavior and how they continue that bad behavior unless you show them what they are doing and why it's wrong.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:39 PM
3

Just posting to say I appreciate these videos from Girlwriteswhat. I always have, but I know it probably helps to keep getting positive feedback. So even though it's probably redundant - just wanted to post and say thanks.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:35 PM
4

I'm sorry... what? I didn't call anyone a cunt and there was no chatroom. I don't use irc or the like. Are you confusing me with someone else?
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:28 PM
9

That link is to everything I posted.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 10:20 AM
2

No, they are concepts no more real than a unicorn or karma.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 08:35 AM
8

Being an MRA is much like growing up not believing in God, in the middle of America's baptist bible belt. You know the seething raw murderous hatred that the "true believers" will send at you if you dare to question the dogma "everybody knows". Why if you don't believe Jesus Christ died for your sins, then you're just a damn idiot who needs to read the bible. That's exactly how it feels being an MRA and having feminists trying to tell me about patriarchy and how I have to read their propaganda (…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:32 AM
48

That's just someone saying "man up" and "be the bigger person" Which is a lame way of saying "she shouldn't have to face consequences for what she did."
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:22 AM
17

I have noticed that lesbians tend to not get along with gay men and vice-versa. It's the media who acts like there's some big happy joy luck club there. There is a bit of solidarity when it comes to fighting for equal rights (or at least there was, /r/LGBT is a great example of how to destroy that solidarity) - but my question was: Who has more privilege - a gay man or a straight woman? Any sincere gay, bisexual, or transsexual person wouldn't shy from that question - they know the answer throug…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:18 AM
3

I opposed the leaks - loudly, so... I have no idea what you are trying to say there.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 07:07 AM
7

Yeah. I see that now. I was confused. My mistake.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:43 AM
11

Edited: Sorry I misunderstood. I'm a bit on edge seeing how scarily corrupted feminists have become when they try to control/censor lgbt discussions and ensure they are pro-women and anti-male.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:35 AM
18

Alright, I think I will. I'd also like to point out that at no time did I use the word "misandry" in my posts. This is just extremist mods trying to censor the lgbt community. Fascinating read, since I said nothing transphobic at all either. I was clearly and utterly without question banned for not towing the "women have it horrible and men live lives of splendor" narrative she's trying to push.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:26 AM
54

WE aren't like this (we the lgbt community) The bigoted mod is.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:05 AM
68

This is the "banworthy" type of stuff I was posting Note that /r/lgbt was upvoting my comments. They agreed with it, but the anti-male mods did not.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:54 AM
3

I'd appreciate an explanation for the downvotes. It's because we know that sentence is full of shit.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 12:11 AM
2

I was opposed to releasing the information and got plenty of attacks from people here for opposing it. However I've also heard rumors the entire thing was a setup - that there never was any real information and it was all a hoax to make us look bad. That's not confirmed though.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:32 PM
13

How it works: If you defend feminism - then you tell people "not all feminists are like that" and "feminism varies too much to be categorized" If you attack feminism - then you get told "mra's are just misogynists" and "feminism is a very specific thing that only a bigot would disagree with" It isn't much different from attacking a religion - if you attack it, you must surely work for whatever version of satan/evil they have. To attack the implementation people have made of the concept, you are …
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:18 PM
12

My mental image of /SRS is the same as of the old ladies going to stand outside the sex toy store to protest it. They want, they need to find something to be offended by.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:25 PM
4

What the fuck did I just read? That was one of the most badly written nonsensical rambling pieces of incoherent tripe I've seen on the internet yet.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:23 PM
1

Can we please stop focusing on subreddit posting history? No. /SRS trolls need to be outed and all legitimacy denied to them. They don't get to play the "but you have to respond to me" card. They are trolls. They get treated like trolls - not people. If and when they learn not to be trolls, then perhaps we can treat them like adults.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:08 PM
1

FGM doesn't completely destroy the ability - you are clearly no medical worker. As for yourself, how do you know how much you lost? You never had a chance to compare.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:06 PM
5

I suppose that's where they get the statistic. Sure, I suppose if you kill babies by giving them herpes as you slice up their penises.. then YES they are less likely to contract aids. Welcome to feminism's version of science.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 05:51 AM
1

Who imagines what happens in everyday life?
/r/MensRights14/03/12 05:23 AM
0

Well it's clear she's either being intentionally obtuse or she's just an idiot. I suppose there is also the potential for both to be true, too.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 03:41 AM
25

Think of all the NAACP could accomplish if they just embraced the KKK! Think of all the jews could accomplish if they just embraced anti-semitism! Think of all the MRM could accomplish if we just embraced feminism's work to make men second-class citizens! Wow! It's great that he pointed out that if we simply caved into and cooperated with the very people out to legislate and dominate us into servile complacency as second class citizens - we could get a lot accomplished! Also nice misrepresentati…
/r/MensRights13/03/12 11:10 PM
0

I do need to be rude if you are intentionally being obtuse here. What you quoted is the very tail end, describing why it is relevant to this reddit - that's all. The main description, the thread title itself - and the point of the entire thread is the debate between PUA and feminists. So either you are just plain clueless (sorry if you find that rude, but it's true) or you are intentionally trying to shift the debate.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 08:05 PM
-1

Ah, I see. I didn't realize you lacked the reading comprehension to read the thread title.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 07:59 PM
0

This isn't about the MRM It is about feminism being hypocritical.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 07:52 PM
4

Feminist organizations are associated with that. The difference is feminism promotes "catching a man" by reproductive and financial enslavement. PUA's just want to get laid. Feminists want to get paid. It is no coincidence that feminism tends to oppose mandatory paternity tests and sane child custody/alimony.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 07:34 PM
7

How it should work : Feminists call out actual misogyny. How it does work: Feminists call any loss of power misogyny.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 07:33 PM
0

No. Fuck /SRS. They deserve nothing.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 06:41 PM
12

No I don't. You're an SRS troll and you deny us the ability to post in your forums. You have no legitimacy here. So fuck off /SRS troll.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 06:34 PM
0

SRS posters don't deserve real responses. They are only here to troll. So yes I absolutely dismiss anything an /SRS poster says here as nothing but trolling.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 06:33 PM
16

Fuck off /SRS troll.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 05:54 PM
8

Feminism: Staunchly opposed to free speech. Pushes for worse penalties for the gender they aren't. Considers 'innocent until proven guilty' a hinderance. Dominates our educational system with one-sided propaganda. Calls anyone who resists a hate group. Way to go feminists. Why wouldn't we like you?
/r/MensRights13/03/12 09:30 AM
2

No, you're just another idiot who latched onto a bit of information without any real understanding of it and tried to use it to prop up your faulty logic. I say idiot not as an insult, but a descriptor of a common mistake. So please don't take offense as I mean it in the general "you don't know what you are doing" sense. That's bad science and you are definitely no neuroscientist.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 04:24 AM
9

It's depressing... much like watching uncritical religious types manipulated by religion, so too is watching how easily marketers use a corrupted feminism and female entitlement to manipulate them. Free? Empowered? Sure, if you buy brand <x>, ladies.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 04:14 AM
37

"All of this," the initial campaign, the full-on response, is targeted at moms No shit. We all know marketers try to sell products to smug female customers by making the men look like idiots. DOGS know it. It's just insulting for them to act like we didn't know that's what they were doing - that they weren't intentionally trying to make men look like idiots who needed a good diaper and a "REAL" mom to save them.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 03:46 AM
4

... but that would be hypocritical of them! Surely they wouldn't do that...
/r/MensRights13/03/12 02:47 AM
4

It's bad science and you are no neuroscientist.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 01:17 AM
2

As I said - pseudoscience junk. That's all you are saying.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 01:11 AM
3

Wow look at King Bigot here. Why do you assume she's not trans? Why are you so cissprivileged in your thinking? You think just because she said she gave birth she can't be trans? A trans woman IS a woman you fucking bigot! Why do you assume she's feminist? It was never said. You've got some serious hate towards feminists! Holy crap you are transphobic as hell, but what else would one expected from someone so cisprivileged.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 12:29 AM
6

That's the same ridiculous pseudo-science that says video games lead to violent behavior.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 12:26 AM
8

Hire your own person to come in with "an anonymous donation of chocolate, only for the men"
/r/MensRights12/03/12 10:34 PM
2

It doesn't really matter. If she's going to falsely accuse him, he's already screwed. She'd just claim there was other things not shown on his video.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 10:33 PM
5

I'm not here to insult. I'm here to out SRS trolls and promote equal rights for men.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:50 PM
6

Your writing is atrocious, kid. Not that I expect much from an SRS poster. Stay in school.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:26 PM
11

They are right. There isn't anything he can do. She has all the power and he has none. That's what feminists somehow call "a patriarchy"
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:23 PM
5

No. You're an SRS troll and don't deserve anything from me. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:13 PM
6

Just doing my duty outing SRS trolls who are in other reddits harassing and trolling threads. It's nice to have these links for when SRS people try to claim they aren't.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:59 PM
5

Fuck off SRS troll.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:46 PM
1

Oh, FFS - get a grip here, munky. The issue is the millions of people dying from cancer - not this single 16 person issue. We should be concerned about real issues right? Why focus on minor details when there's something bigger going on! We should always and only focus on the absolute maximum thing ever! That's the fucking tragedy - that millions of people are dying. That's all.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:08 PM
2

You are missing the point. Even if it only happens 10% of the time - that's millions of people it happens to. If marriage were your disney-perfect ideal they wouldn't be getting divorced in the first place, now would they?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:32 AM
15

How it works: If women say "Men, stop raping!" and mra's get upset because they know most men don't rape, then they are supporting rapists - because some men are rapists. If men say "Women, stop gold-digging!" then feminists call that sexist and misogynistic, its somehow different - even though some women are gold-diggers? This is the kind of thing feminists and women don't want to see is offensive to men though. They are vested in not accepting the hypocrisy of it.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 01:57 AM
0

Well, this is /r/mensrights so I can only direct you to the sidebar and faq. I don't really feel like rehashing something you are just going to argue with anyway.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 01:48 AM
11

He acknowledges he must begin saving money for an apartment, but he resents being judged by his inability to purchase property. He would rather have a woman love him for his charm than for the roof he puts over her head. Feminists, when we say "men are financially objectified" - that is what we mean.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 01:18 AM
2

Well, preaching to the choir there. I consider myself an egalitarian. I support equality between the sexes. Feminism doesn't seem to be pushing that direction though, they want advantages over men.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 12:59 AM
3

Yes, the term they use is "benevolent sexism". It is how they spin something that is so obviously blatantly female privilege that it can't be denied existing - into yet another claim of victimhood.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 12:33 AM
1

That's exactly the issue we are discussing here. Couple gets married, has a child... suddenly she decides she's going to stop working. If he objects, if he "flees" - she gets custody of the child, child payments, and LIFETIME ALIMONY (see thread title). That's the problem - that's the issue. With the current legal system she's got all the power. ALL of it.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 12:01 AM
1

Yes you can. When it comes to reproductive rights and the ability to say "I'm staying home with the kids, you have to work" - she has all the power. What is he going to do? He can't say no and force her to work. Then he's being all "domineering and abusive" He just has to take it. He has no other option.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 10:39 PM
2

Joint decision? You mean where she says "I'm not going to work" and he just has to accept it?
/r/MensRights11/03/12 10:37 PM
2

Actually it is worse than that. It smarms the implication that a woman's worth is so much more than a man's - that she's essentially priceless and that no amount of money could be enough.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 10:36 PM
4

Like calling men on reddit sexist by defining sexism as something men can do to women but women can't do to men.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 10:34 PM
3

"MEN AREN'T ON AVERAGE STRONGER THAN WOMEN? DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ENABLER!"
/r/MensRights11/03/12 10:23 PM
5

Apparently much of the women in our culture don't think men actually feel it. I can't fathom the fantasyland someone must live in to think men have no idea what it's like to have someone they love break up with them.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 10:06 PM
10

Yeah, if sex is what you want - you're better off not getting married.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 10:02 PM
4

"No. Unless your life's in danger, you do NOT hit a woman, even if she's wailing on you. Not cool." I bet that gay guy who was beaten all to hell by the three lesbians is just all about that rule of chivalry these days.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 09:50 PM
1

If you think that's a game. You've really got some issues. So go ahead, make the next post and make it the last. Rant on, rave on, make the brilliant "there I told him" post you know you want to.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 08:24 PM
0

o... kay...
/r/MensRights11/03/12 11:57 AM
0

Step away from the computer. You are just ranting now, your typing is getting bad, so is your punctuation - all signs that you are getting too emotionally unraveled to continue this. Let's argue another time when it would be more fair. I don't like kicking people when they are down.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 10:08 AM
1

Nice ad hominems Mr. Hypocrite. I'm sorry you are still incapable of realizing that your opinion is the minority opinion here and that you've resorted to the same things you rage about others supposedly doing. I think you need a time out, kid.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 10:01 AM
1

I just want you to actually read the sidebar before you claim your opinion about /r/mensrights is more valid than the sidebar's. It isn't my fault if you are incapable of that. That's not an ad hominem, it's a simple statement of fact.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 09:45 AM
-1

I'm just skeptical you see. A 2 year old account with 700 karma? I've gotten more than that from a single post.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 08:37 AM
14

...but... but... people say women have it worse?
/r/MensRights11/03/12 08:00 AM
2

Interesting that the goodmenproject is going on the defensive here. Maybe they are starting to realize what's really at stake and what's really going on? Perhaps they realize they are next?
/r/MensRights11/03/12 06:00 AM
7

HOW DARE YOU MAKE A JOKE REGARDING WOMYN'S RIGHTS AND FEMINISM'S GLORIOUS STRUGGLE FOR FREEDOM FROM THE OPPRESSIVE PENISOCRACY. YOU HORRIBLE HATE PERSON THAT HATES ALL THE UNHATING GOOD PEOPLE OF THE WORLD.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 03:43 AM
7

fuckduck sounds like just another srs troll trying to make us look bad. Never posed here before an hour ago? Check. Saying ridiculous things that would make us look bad? Check. Suddenly making threads about /MR and /SRS? Check! This all smells like hokum to me.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 02:29 AM
-1

No you haven't. Go on, actually read it.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:29 PM
-1

I realize you have difficulties with it, but perhaps you should keep on trying. The sidebar is over there to the right. Ask your parents for help reading it.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:54 PM
0

You didn't read it. Go read it. It's right there. Hint look for the word "feminism" - in the side bar. You can do it.. Come on.. give it a try.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:43 PM
7

That kid who was climbing and obviously fell and hurt himself was sort of ironically amusing. It is pretty clear from the photo there was no "police brutality" it was just him being stupid. As for the rest - feminism is rape obsessed, and for good reason. It is their hammer, their wedge topic, their religion.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:36 PM
-1

Reading is hard, huh?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:28 PM
-1

You haven't read the side bar. Quit lying.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:12 PM
-4

Does nobody read the fucking sidebar? READ the fucking sidebar.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:24 PM
-7

I'm serious. I'd like actual discussion here and not just some nitwit like you who can't read trailing on my every word like a little parasite. If you just want to troll my posts then I'll treat you like one. As it is you've not only said nothing worth saying, but you failed to even read my post properly and instead went on some rant about something you've clearly had as a stick up your ass instead. Also HINT: Read the fucking sidebar before you start claiming YOU represent the views here. Now g…
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:44 AM
-4

Please don't ever post in reply to my posts again. You're an idiot, you lack reading comprehension, and all you say is noise.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:40 AM
2

The hell is your problem? Of course it is or I wouldn't be saying so. What are you even posting that type of trite response for?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:36 AM
6

I'm not here to try and tell you how to define it. I'm telling you how most mra's define it and how feminism operates in practice.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:24 AM
7

wtf is with your username btw?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:48 AM
4

"Female-born" Oh.. so.. they are transphobic while trying to get the SPLC to do their dirty work?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:41 AM
4

Exactly. The very notion of it is satire.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:36 AM
9

Wow goooooons... hyperbole much?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:42 AM
19

We define feminist as "female supremacist" - i.e. people trying not to gain equal rights for either gender but superior rights for women. So by that definition we oppose it because we want equal rights for both genders. Yes we realize there are many kinds of feminists, all of them calling themselves feminist. It is silly to begrudge us the ability to call certain portions of feminism as "feminists" in the same way. There is no single definition of feminist, so we use the definition we wish just …
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:37 AM
1

It's a ridiculous nitpicking that ignores the two were intertwined issues. You're just looking for something to whine about.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:33 AM
0

Thats your argument? Next time just stay quiet please.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:55 PM
-2

Nice sockpuppet
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:57 AM
0

You ... do realize you just agreed with what I said right?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:57 AM
-2

Nice retort kid
/r/MensRights08/03/12 10:46 PM
3

Yet another, yeah. I'm so sick of hearing "not all feminists are like that" when most are and so many entrenched ones in positions of power and influence are. Who exactly isn't like that? The silent ones? The ones who come here to argue with us and tell us they are the magic unicorn of perfection?
/r/MensRights08/03/12 07:31 AM
14

Yes, that's why if you get back grades at Vassar you should claim a teacher raped you - because you are experiencing academic intimidation and don't give a hoot about the teacher.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 07:25 AM
0

Fuck off SRS poster
/r/MensRights08/03/12 02:49 AM
0

Frankly my dear I dont really care what an SRA troll says.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 01:36 AM
13

If feminist logic applied to men - You were raped.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:38 PM
1

There you go with the "tone" argument again. You're an /SRS poster - of multiple SRS reddits. You're a fuckwit hypocrite, a badgering troll. You aren't some random person wandering in here. You're an anti-mra feminist SRS troll. I've reviewed your post history - so don't try to play the innocent naive newbie card. There's no anger, just spite towards you and /SRS. You become an SRS poster and you're a piece of shit with no legitimacy here or right to respect. It's that simple. So fuck off. We ne…
/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:01 PM
1

Sorry, but you post to /SRS as you have and you lose all legitimacy here. So fuck off troll. You're a worthless piece of shit and we won't miss you. We don't care to hear your shaming. We don't care to hear your "but you are supposed to be better than us!" hypocrisy. We don't care to hear you trying to attack us for what you did first. It's fucking disgusting how you treat people like crap then whine that they have to treat you better. So take back some of what YOU and /SRS are dishing out. Just…
/r/MensRights07/03/12 09:48 PM
22

The solution here is simple: The man should demand an 'engagement watch' of equal value
/r/MensRights07/03/12 07:18 PM
6

You post to /SRS. You have NO right to tell people how to talk to each other. You're just a hypocrite who tries to shame other posters too If we were to "reciprocate" - to treat you as /SRS treats others, I'd be telling you to go fuck yourself in a dozen different ways right now, making fun of you in whatever I thought would get to you and hurt you most, and ABSOLUTELY be calling you an idiot and that you were just plain wrong. So take your "tone" arguments and shove them up your ass.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 07:09 PM
4

Good stuff Eeph. Should keep posters more honest and "certain reddits" from being unable to pull that scam again.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 06:53 PM
1

I suppose it depends which definition of intelligence you are using.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 05:44 AM
1

It is just the media hyping the news - playing on society's view that a woman dying is vastly more dramatic than a man dying.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 12:31 AM
4

I think she's right. The best way to organize a team is a mix. That works both with all-male teams and with all-female teams. The problem is an all-male team gets affirmative action applied to it and women forced in... but an all-female team is given a pass.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 12:18 AM
2

It is insidious that way.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 12:00 AM
1

Video was removed. This subject is dead because no one else can see and comment on it now.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 11:00 PM
31

any suggestion that corporate affairs teams made up of only women may not be taken as seriously as a male team was “offensive - to females and males”. That's feminist logic for you. Mixed men and women = Most flexible and healthy. All men = offensive and horrible, sexist and exclusionary. All women = JUST AS GOOD AS MIXED Here's the irony - the woman in the article makes perfect sense: "“Our view is that an all-female environment is bad, and an all-male environment is bad,” Ms Conway said. “You …
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:38 PM
-5

Except that feminists actually do discuss women's issues, Are you on drugs? Who anywhere, ever - says otherwise? ... As for this... I know of very, very few feminists who could be classified as "man-haters." That is because you don't want to see it. We see it all over the place because we aren't vested in ignoring it.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:18 PM
1

Remember too here - the reason the voting age was lowered to 18 was so that boys could be drafted earlier (drafting goes from 21 to 18, voting goes from 21 to 18) Voting was supposed to be a reward for being willing to defend your country. By that rationale, women who still can't be drafted don't really deserve to vote. Until then it's just a free privilege and entitlement they haven't earned.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:17 PM
5

Bwahahahahahaha. Oh man. Keep posting. I love it when you idiots keep talking and just showing you ridiculous you are.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 10:33 AM
7

Hahahahaha oh god you're too fucking stupid to even try to explain it to. Get some sleep and read what you wrote in the morning.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 10:21 AM
2

You can be pretty sure anytime someone quotes Rosen that it's going to be a rationalization of women's advantages and excuses for how the men in their lives deserve to be treated like second class citizens because of mistaken views about things nearly a century ago.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 10:13 AM
9

Dude. If you don't know what power is, then just shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 10:09 AM
15

Nah dude, just horse-shit spilling out of your mouth as you linger in denial about power and trying to use semantics that don't even work either.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:57 AM
14

I'm sorry but here's what I stop talking to you. You're clearly too stupid and too vested in your dogma as women being victims to talk to.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:51 AM
16

I don't think you understand the word "empowerment" Hint: It is based on the word "power"
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:28 AM
15

I'm sorry to burst your feminist-patriarchy-ranting, but NO. Women have generally been the ones who controlled sex, not men.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 09:15 AM
2

Why do you assume you are one of the "good" feminists? What exactly is your stance? I'd question why you think feminism needs to still exist at all. Women earn more, spend more, live longer, usually get custody, usually get alimony, live hyperprotected lives, can destroy men with nothing but one consequence-free accussation, outnumber men in college and graduate more, control voting, dont have to fight in wars, have all the reproductive choice, and even the hat of most-victimishiness. Just WHAT …
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:19 PM
6

It's simple. The feminists who aren't like that stay silent about the ones who are. So the ones who are win and take over - and we have to fight them.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:06 PM
32

Good article for the most part. I'd object to saying men were "slackers" as though we had some responsibility to marry and support women though. We don't have that responsibility - and women (not feminists, unfortunately) are starting to slowly realize that the flip side to the feminist mantra "women need men like a fish needs a bicycle" is "men need women like a bank needs a bank robber." Not the feminists of reddit of course, who are still young enough to think the world stays as it is in your…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:50 AM
11

I'd invite her to talk over coffee, although she might misinterpret me. Are you serious? She'll probably accuse you of being a terrorist out to rape her entire family.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 02:35 AM
35

Wow, she really didn't like us calling her out on her having a rape fantasy on an elevator did she? Turn about: "Feminism pretends to be about women's issues... they're really about shitting on men and rape fantasies. It isn't pretty."
/r/MensRights05/03/12 02:32 AM
0

I stopped reading after this line: I'm very much interesting in what masculinity means in a feminist context That really means "I'm feminist indoctrinated which means I'm generally, literally, opposed to men's rights."
/r/MensRights04/03/12 11:06 PM
2

Accusations of being incredibly angry. Accusations of hating other things (as though we were homophobic, or anti-liberal, or anti-some-race, or anti-poor, etc) Being told to "be the bigger man" in an argument. Accusations of "just being ignorant of what feminism really is"
/r/MensRights04/03/12 10:49 PM
2

Working with feminists is NOT an option. How can you work with the very people who are attacking you?
/r/MensRights04/03/12 10:46 PM
-2

EVERYTHING
/r/MensRights04/03/12 10:35 PM
5

She would "divorce him as a loser", then go find a man wealthier than her.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 08:24 AM
2

How it works: You are sexist if you think men are generally stronger than woman. You are sexist if you don't think men are generally stronger than woman. It all depends on if you are discussing women being entitled to the same job, or if you are discussing men being immediately ruled against in a dispute. That's it. That's all. It's all to give her maximum privilege and him minimum.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 08:09 AM
5

What? You don't trust women to be the arbitrators of what's fair for men?
/r/MensRights04/03/12 08:04 AM
8

It's said. Marketing has told women what they are supposed to be. Women then decide that's what men should be, because they believe women superior. So ultimately we have men being made to dress and act like how marketing has told women to be. That's what happens when women control 80% of the buying power though. If there is a patriarchy, it sure sucks at being a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 07:58 AM
1

Fair enough. Welcome to /r/mensrights then.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:42 AM
5

And this is the real point - men are not. According to the same research, men are getting happier and, moreover, are even happier as they get older. Remember - these are the same men who are increasingly avoiding women and giving up on marriage. Correlation.. causation..? Who can say for sure, but it seems obvious the men know what's up.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:39 AM
1

My only beef with the transgendered people who come here is that they are like dry-drunks. They decide to transition, then suddenly they become the most radical extremist man-hating pro-women feminists out there. I can only assume it is some kind of buy-legitimacy thing.. or distance from being male. It's annoying as hell though, because it's so over the top. They end up far more radical and militant than feminists who were born women.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:23 AM
3

Does it help any to know we don't care if you are transexual. That we only care if you are an MRA, feminism, or neutral? I mean seriously. We just don't care except for how it relates to gaining equal rights for men.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:13 AM
9

Feminist logic: "The earth is flat because round is patriarchal."
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:11 AM
17

Did you know that without <x> every day the human body dies? Yet women can go without <x> for an entire week!
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:08 AM
29

Holy crap feminism makes up some ridiculous propaganda. In other news, feminism cures cancer and will solve all our energy problems and lead us into glorious future of people's republic. Also remember that this person is the one supposedly behind the science of that statement.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:04 AM
10

Agreed. We often get people here telling us to "tone it down", not to speak out against feminists... that maybe if we were more passive we'd do better. Fuck that. We didn't grow because of standing down. We grew because people saw what was going on and realized others were speaking out about it - fighting. I do think virtually every last one of the pro-violence and "pro-rape" posters are simply feminist trolls and /srs false flag raisers. This is not a reddit that advocates violence though and I…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:15 AM
12

How it works is feminists act like the patriarchy is some kind of boy's club that helps men... then turn around and say the patriarchy hurts men too. You can be pretty confident though that when a feminist says "the patriarchy" she's about to go on a ridiculous anti-male rant.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 01:53 AM
2

... but the Transfolk of Reddit say that there's nothing wrong with deceiving someone about your physical gender. Oh wait sorry, she wasn't deceiving - she's "really a man". Okay, so sentence 'him' like you would a man. Quadruple the penalties and put him into a male prison and left alone to be treated as child molesters are in prison. Go go equality!
/r/MensRights04/03/12 12:18 AM
7

It isn't irrelevant that it is always women arguing for why mandatory paternity testing shouldn't happen, and why you don't really ever (minus the feminist drones) men ever say that it shouldn't. That writer isn't making real arguments - she's protecting agency, seeking to preserve the right to deceive.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 12:51 PM
4

Uhm.. the problem has nothing to do with conservative/traditionalist approaches. It has to do with not giving legal and social incentives to wives to screw husbands over, take all their money and the kids.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 06:47 AM
5

I see my "how it works" style has been instructive.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 06:33 AM
1

Somewhere down in the stack of comments in one of those threads I came across this: . It just so happens that most feminists are women, and surprise surprise, people tend to only advocate for themselves. So, in brief, MRM is a splinter group off of third-wave feminism that advocates for men's rights in our society. A very interesting idea.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 09:29 AM
3

lol Nancy Grace.. the hysterical mud-slinging bitter twisted fanatic? She'd have been perfect as Roger Dascombe from V for Vendetta Well feminists, let's have some justice here - let's treat him exactly like how female teachers who "fall in love with" their male students are.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 06:13 AM
15

A man, near a child? Replacing a mother? HOW DARE HE.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 01:22 AM
1

Actually one has pretty much fought tooth and nail against science and modernization, computers were mostly invented by a gay man who fought the nazis... and the other is just what happens when you take away reason and accountability.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 01:16 AM
8

I was banned from /r/anarchism for referring to one of the mods in the gender-neutral term "they" There is no way to win it. If you play they attack you for using the wrong term. If you don't play they attack you for being gendered.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 12:19 AM
1

I think in this case he was referring to appeasement and how it doesn't work. Feminists want appeasement, but much like <x> it's never enough. They always want more - until they start to do some real evil with it. Sure they could have compared it to something other than <x>, references to <x> can be kind of lame - but do you know a better example of the perils of appeasement off hand?
/r/MensRights02/03/12 12:09 AM
1

There's really not a lot of difference in the end. They both tend towards being anti-sex, they are both based on dogma, they both try to set up their own flawed educational systems, they both exalt women as virtuous and men as scum, they both are intolerant of dissent... and they both have a few members who really try to do the right thing but are vastly outnumbered by the zealous fanatics on a crusade. I do love how I get downvoted for saying so, too. Feminists RAGE at the thought they might al…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 09:54 PM
3

I think at the very less it would be reckless endangerment.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 08:15 PM
11

Don't worry about it. Feminists don't really debate. It's like worrying about a religious fanatic's opinion.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 05:47 PM
1

Oh, well go fuck yourself you hypocritical ass then.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 05:41 PM
2

They didn't "drop the ball", it was intentional and on purpose.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 09:01 AM
1

Nah. I wish I had though. I'd totally claim credit if I did.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 06:40 AM
11

A man needs a woman like a bank needs a robber Eloquence. The comment is doing it right.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 11:05 PM
2

Yeppers
/r/MensRights29/02/12 01:45 AM
3

Because you can prove the international feminist anti-male agenda exists.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 01:24 AM
5

That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying feminists use universities as propaganda factories to churn out massive volumes, precisely so they can dominate forums like wikipedia.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 01:05 AM
1

The article writer knows that men die earlier than women, although doesn't go into why. The assumption is just that dad will be dead while mom lives on long after.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:50 PM
19

Don't you get it? This is why feminists took over university departments to churn out endless ranting biased papers. It is so people can cite those papers to seem legitimate. It is so this very situation would happen - where the "male privilege" page is left alone because of all the links to feminist propaganda but the "female" privilege page isn't allowed because departments devoted to men's rights aren't allowed (and are actually fought viciously against by supposed gender egalitarians)
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:46 PM
3

This entire thing feels like something /SRS did to try and paint us in a certain way. If not, it's still ridiculous to try and make this about anything except circumcision itself.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 07:10 PM
1

Not really. The apology is solely for saying "good riddance" to someone dying. She's apologizing for that, not for all the other stupid shit.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 05:58 PM
5

Why are you posting on an obvious alt account?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:54 AM
5

Yes, we should really be getting our facts & opinions about male circumcision from a BIGOTED FEMALE ANTI-MALE HOMIDICIDAL LESBIAN (completely accurate, read the article)
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:18 AM
3

littletigerwatch : 575 link karma, -1 comment karma We don't want this here. We certainly don't want "anti-zionism" here.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:16 AM
7

If feminists aren't willing to condemn this person, then I'm not buying it when feminists say they "aren't all like that". ... because they are, when they stay silent.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:04 AM
3

That's a lot of rationalizing of a few people's D/s bdsm kinks. That or some really stupid idiots.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 03:57 AM
16

How it works: Equal representation: When men lag behind, it is because they are lazy and women are better. When women lag behind, it is because men are oppressing them. Drinking & Dating: When a woman is more drunk than a man then have sex : The man is a rapist. When a man and a woman get equally drunk then have sex : The man is a rapist. When a man is more drunk than a woman then have sex: The man should commit. Men around children: It's shameful how men don't fulfill their duties as fathers an…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 12:14 AM
1

We aren't arguing. You are trying to conflate this to be about generalities and I'm pointing out it is about specifics. There's nothing more to say to you. There was nothing really to start with. Present your data. All you have is claims and tangents.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:08 PM
7

The fuck? What tangent are you going off on? Who cares? What matters is if a specific female and a specific male can do the job. I'd rather my sister be there doing the job than a male who was less capable.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:01 PM
3

My sister takes weight-gain bulk-up stuff and works out (I guarantee) more than you or I do. She's ripped and could easily carry the 200lb male on her shoulder. ... and I say all this as an MRA poster of over two years.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 11:57 AM
5

I think you watch too many movies of the heroic rescue by a lone firefighter tossing a person over their shoulder and running through a burning building.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 11:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter