TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aloneinlove Archive

View 5 posts and 350 comments by aloneinlove on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I always thought TRP was about adapting to the realities of this world and getting it to bend to your will. It says nothing about freedom.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 08:14 AM
2

Medicinal gum has been legal since 2004 thanks to a FTA with the U.S. who pushed for it.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 04:31 AM
12

I'm Singaporean and it's shocking to see claims of racism being made against people who argue for sensible immigration policies. I'm referring to UKIP in particular but I understand this issue has surfaced all over Europe. Thankfully we don't have much of that feminist leftist nonsense here so I've never heard of such a ridiculous argument until reddit. We are a first world country so we naturally have issues with immigration, but it's usually characterised as a jobs/ overpopulation/ identity is…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 04:21 AM
3

I definitely agree that Singapore guys are red pill in general. My brother became redpill while serving NS, it's amazing what having a group of male friends in a disciplined environment can do to you. He started lifting (been for years now) and he takes no shits from anyone. He's constantly looking to improve himself career wise. Funnily I've served too but I'm still beta after casually reading TRP for a year, while my bro has never even heard of the term redpill.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 04:10 AM
9

They say they stand up against bigotry, but their brand of rad fem is at its core very sexist towards men. They have repeatedly shown themselves to be hypocrites, so for your sane mind just stay away from them.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 04:02 AM
9

I have been in the army. Fuck you.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:23 AM
2

Again, conveniently missing the crux of my point. The fact is the girl lied about her age and there is a precedent of the man being convicted despite that. It's not a case of a 10 year old not giving consent, it's a fucking 17 year old who looks like she's in her 20s. Had this happen to you you would be rightfully pissed off also. How are you supposed to know her age, when she can even use fake IDs to fool you? How about you answer that before we continue? Are you saying that if an underage boy …
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:43 AM
2

I LOVE how feminists like you complain about laws that don't favour women, then suddenly act like the law is extremely valid using it as a moral compass when it's used against men. How about you stop being a fucking hypocrite and view the case from BOTH sides instead of ONLY looking at it from the point of a woman? The fact is the girl lied about her age and there is a precedent of the man being convicted despite that. It's not a case of a 10 year old not giving consent, it's a fucking 17 year o…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 03:56 AM
2

Yeah how about the mainstream feminist groups that actually have a dominant position in society become egalitarian first, then we'll talk.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 05:14 PM
2

Feminists like her think that because women are oppressed it gives them the right to say anything. We're victims, we should have superior rights to men. Oh and feminism is all about equality.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 05:16 AM
4

The common feminist argument against increasing severity of punishment of false accusations is that it prevents rape victims from coming forward to report the crime. Some groups even outright want the removal of punishment against false rape accusers. This argument can be easily debunked by the fact that only cases where the accuser has conclusively been proven to have lied about the whole thing will get punished. Evidence.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 05:11 AM
3

Time to get a new friend!
/r/MensRights02/02/12 10:14 AM
0

I believe knowing about the issues is important because it keeps you informed about the current state of affairs. Mensrights is not all angry men, there are women here who have their husbands/boyfriends/uncles/children screwed over by the system. And there are gender egalitarians who are here because they find the issues faced by men equally valid to issues faced by women. Where else can you get news about mens rights getting trampled on and people actually defending men? You can skip the commen…
/r/MensRights01/02/12 05:32 AM
1

To be fair I'm certain this is written by a teenage girl, or a woman who needs to grow up. Either case it's safe to say no sane woman believes that. Also if you change the title to Girlfriends/Wives really appreciates it if their man sometimes: and remove number 3 I find it's acceptable.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 05:26 AM
1

That's way too high level of a trolling, I can't see that much credit given to them. Maybe there's at least two clear tiers of people amongst the demographic of SRS? One is the mods who are just attention seeking trolls from SA while their actions have unintentionally attracted another group of people who religiously believe in political correctness and will do anything to defend the cult. If this is true then the brainwashed group has got to be the saddest people I've seen. But again this theor…
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:10 AM
5

I don't care what politics they subscribe to, but preaching their flawed feminist views to us and insulting us is something I will not tolerate.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 12:31 AM
10

Thing is I refuse to believe they are just trolling. They truly believe in the shit they are saying, using trolling or circlejerking to excuse their behaviour. Why do you think they needed SRSDiscussion and other subreddits? It's to discuss matters from the feminist point of view. There's no way they will go that far if it's just trolling.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 11:25 PM
4

This is related to mens rights?
/r/MensRights30/01/12 09:09 PM
12

I want to, and have been trying to for quite a while now. The problem is some feminists downright refuse to see the MRA viewpoint and are just here solely to preach their already well known viewpoints. It's starting to get really tiring. I'm honestly depressed seeing MRAs get called falsely accused of being misogynists and getting undeserved insults all the time.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 06:35 AM
3

Because all MRAs want to kill black people or women eh? I think your perception of the MRM is too skewed from spending so much time on SRS. You think that way of MRAs because the SRS hivemind tells you that. You are nothing more than a brainwashed pion. On the other hand the rest of reddit thinks SRS is full of hatred and crazy bigots, that's kinda consistent if you ask me.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 12:47 PM
1

I'm starting to get sick of all these petty fighting instigated by SRS. Is there a place I can discuss gender egalitarianism without the cacophony of these battles that serves absolutely no purpose.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 05:28 AM
0

I'm sure they'll spin it as "we are just doing this to show how racist reddit is blah blah". This is how low some people will go.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 02:57 AM
2

Eh Sophonax is a mod on r/KillWhitey. I think it's safe to say there's something wrong with her mental state.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 02:49 AM
2

I think it's more like: people don't agree with feminism, they must be sexist! I also love how srs swoops in and acts like a shining beacon of light for women online. We agree with you, come circlejerk with us where we can all agree with each other! There are egalitarians, certain sections of feminists and MRAs that want MRM and feminism to work together, but groups like SRS are designed to prevent that. They use mob mentality to shut down discussion and bully people who don't agree with them. I…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 10:52 PM
3

I think we need a consensus on what all MRAs here think of feminism as there's a clear difference in opinion amongst members. When I first came here the first thing I saw was this subreddit is created entirely opposed to feminism. I didn't necessarily agree with that, but I saw some of the issues men are facing and I agree entirely that men need a movement to correct some of the inequality feminism has created in today's world. What exactly are these issues we have with feminism? Why are we oppo…
/r/MensRights26/01/12 12:03 PM
6

If a girl tells you to stop just do as she says and ask her what's wrong. If you can't get any clear answer then pick up your stuff and leave.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 11:34 AM
11

Sophonax is a lost cause. She just trolls this subreddit with tons of false accusations and make up stories whenever she tries to debate but loses. I didn't read what she said, it's probably just more bitching that no one gives a shit about.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 05:09 AM
1

I'd like to think we have better things to do then mimicking them.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 04:51 AM
2

The reason why it's so is because most of the MRAs had limited information on the case. They did not see the update which provided clear details on the case. That's why I said its a misunderstanding and I reject the notion that it is representative of the MRM unlike what SRS likes to believe.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 04:35 AM
2

To be fair I don't think both Whispers and hardwarequestion saw this post. They were basing their arguments on limited information provided by AppleGods in an earlier post. This is clear if you look at the arguments posted by them in this thread.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 02:28 AM
13

I understand that, but we really should put this right. AppleGods was raped and it's a horrible thing. We said some horrible things to her in the other thread.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 02:17 AM
8

ATTENTION: This looks like it's a huge misunderstanding Read this: http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/ourzc/if_a_child_conceived_by_rape_is_a_blessing_from/c3kjerf This was submitted 8 hours ago but hardwarequestions and Whisper appears to not have seen this and based their arguments on what they initially saw (14 hours ago). SRS on the other hand probably saw that post already and argued their position based on that. It is clear AppleGods had been raped. Seems like a huge misunderstanding…
/r/MensRights26/01/12 02:13 AM
0

They often get called trolls and circlejerks that somehow excuses their behaviour. I'm not going to give them that leeway because it's not true that they are just trolling. They are really serious in the things they do.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 01:56 AM
3

They don't look to be trolling in this case. It's obvious they are very serious about rape issues, their thread on their own subreddit had 160 comments within 3 hours. They truly believe in the shit they say.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 01:43 AM
1

QwestionEveryPost's post received 8 upvotes within 1 hour while hardwarequestions's post was at -4 within 47 minutes.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 01:19 AM
1

No one is okay with paedophilia, that's a big claim to say and you need to back up your claims. I don't claim to understand how statutory rape victims go through, so do you have any links that backup your point that consensual sex between a teenager and an adult will "fuck people up and lead them to suicide"?
/r/MensRights25/01/12 10:13 PM
2

The more I read the replies to my question the more confused I get. I wish to clarify some things. Were you sexually assaulted or was it consensual like this case? Because I simply fail to see how consensual sex will lead to psychological damage and nightmares. I'm not claiming to know how you feel, but it requires a leap of faith of me to believe that. What do you mean by MRA judge? Nowhere in the article does it state that, and what has this sentencing got to do with the MRM?
/r/MensRights25/01/12 10:10 PM
-1

She said she son had recurring nightmares and psychological damage as a result of the sexual encounter at Starr's home in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Please educate me on this: Why would he have psychological damage if the acts were consensual?
/r/MensRights25/01/12 12:54 PM
35

We choose to commit crimes more often, we choose to apply for more dangerous jobs, we choose not to accept help when it's there, we make bad choices. That's not discrimination. Hey, I chose to be born male and serve mandatory national service for 2 years in Singapore. American men chose to have welfare denied to them if they don't signed up for selective service. Fathers choose not to take care of their children because the courts award custody to women most of the time. Men choose to get vilifi…
/r/MensRights24/01/12 08:53 PM
21

Why is she entitled to his money in the first place when she is clearly capable of supporting herself? He got the custody, she should be paying him child support instead. Sounds like the family laws are fucked up in Australia.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 11:10 AM
9

I see this thread has been run through by the srs brigade train.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 09:02 AM
5

It would help if you link to specific speeches and books by mainstream feminists and point out their inconsistencies. Making one sided sweeping statements like these doesn't help anyone and alienates women who identify as feminists.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 07:51 AM
1

Growing up I've always been in classes with equal number of guys and girls do I simply have no idea what it's like to have a majority of one gender in classes, I'd imagine it must bring about some form of stress (sexual tension) to be in a gender minority especially in puberty age. On the flip side, there's the possibility the attention the minority gender gets is positive. In both cases they are bound to get attention and I can sort of see the motive behind the segregated classes. That said, sh…
/r/MensRights24/01/12 12:21 AM
7

I think they are partially trying to play the reverse sexism "to show how sexist reddit is" card. Most of the time it just makes them look bad because reddit isn't inherently sexist and people see through their bullshit. I also believe they are a bunch of attention seekers who create a false sense of superiority for themselves by acting as the authority for political correctness. They are nothing but self serving people who are desperately seeking internet fame to validate their sense of self wo…
/r/MensRights23/01/12 05:16 PM
6

My god. He had 4 children and lost them in various ways. I can't imagine the pain he must have felt.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 04:56 PM
1

Actually I think they are smarter than that. However their logical thinking stops when people disagree with them, and so they need that circlejerk to reinforce the idea that they are right and cannot ever in the history of time be wrong.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 04:51 PM
2

Their latest excuse for trolling is THE INTERNET IS MISOGYNIST AND DOESN'T PROVIDE A SAFE HEAVEN FOR FEMINISTS TO HAVE DISCUSSIONS SO WE HAVE TO TROLL PEOPLE UNTIL THEY STOP DISAGREEING WITH US!!!
/r/MensRights23/01/12 04:48 PM
1

I'm pretty sure they have actually artificially inflated their subscriber count in order to make it seem like they have a much larger subscriber base than reality. I remember it was like 266k subscriber the last time I was there and was shocked, then I realised they added 26 in front of the actual number using CSS.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 04:47 PM
2

You have got to be specific here. In science classes dominated by guys, girls can't deal with the attention? Or they were looked down upon? Expected to do better or worse? The feminists who commented on this article take this "intimidation by boys" as fact, so I would love an input from a female perspective.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 04:34 PM
9

It's like their minds stop working when certain key words are mentioned and then start spewing out arguments from their politically correct feminist classes. Or just blah blah patriarchy blah blah women are oppressed so we deserve special rights... How dare you call me out on wanting special rights! You misogynist pig! To go one further, some feminists can just make up "facts" on the spot. (Cue Jenna Myers Karvunidis.) I was having an argument with a feminist today on the issue of teachers havin…
/r/MensRights23/01/12 09:30 AM
2

So you're saying many male teachers are regularly having sex with under aged students at your high school, which you knew about 5-10 years ago, reported it but nothing was ever done about it by the law enforcement, prosecutors, parents etc. I can see what you are doing now, you're just trolling again. I offered you an olive branch and here you are wasting both our time.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 02:26 AM
2

You said 5-10 years ago, I was just under the impression this is a continual thing because you said you were a feminist not just in name and you stood up and said things about it. If true, that's awesome. I'd just wanted to see the other side of the story and you failed to provide it. I would say I remain unconvinced by the lack of evidence. Or perhaps you have links to feminist articles online that discuss this?
/r/MensRights23/01/12 02:04 AM
1

Also, where I come from many men are not punished in the same way, even as teachers, for diddling minors. If anything, THEY KEEP THEIR JOBS UNLIKE THIS WOMAN. 5-10 years ago ...
/r/MensRights23/01/12 01:58 AM
1

Whaaat? I'm asking you to back up your claims about you saying male teachers are not punished for similar crimes this female teacher did where you live.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 01:52 AM
1

I would like to see you back your claims up: where you come from, the links of the incidents mentioned.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 01:41 AM
2

Like I said, if you aren't here to debate just get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 01:21 AM
3

I see your point. I don't agree with your long post though. Pregnancy is something nearly 100% of women and exactly 0% of men have. When you talk about behavioural impetus, it varies wildly even between people of the same sex itself. Some men have more sex drive than other men, some are homosexuals, some are asexuals. That is difficult to govern and the laws should be gender neutral in this case.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 08:03 AM
7

Well since you are too dumb to see my point, I'll spell it out for ya. There is nothing hypocritical about thinking it's natural for men to be attracted to 16-year olds and statutory rape is a joke, while at the same time also pointing out inequality in punishment that favour women in this case. Your original post was trying to point out hypocrisy in MRAs, that we have double standards but I simply fail to see how it is. I repeat, we are merely pointing out inequality in laws in this case, and n…
/r/MensRights22/01/12 07:40 AM
6

Again, you failed to directly address what you felt was wrong with my reply and continued to make statements on MRAs that have nothing to do with the topic at hand. You are exactly the kind of feminist that most women hate to associate with. I have replied to your original post, and yet to receive any rebuttal on that. Address that directly and we'll talk.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 07:18 AM
3

I choose to believe in order to be for equality, everyone should be subjected to the same laws. Not special rights for certain "underprivileged groups". That'll be unequal and privilege.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 07:13 AM
3

Your precious subreddit mods ban anyone who disagrees with them. That's Something really Awful. Are you SRS about making that statement? EDIT: And for the record, I don't believe the mods here ban people for having different opinions. They only ban trolls who are here to shut down discussion and call people names, and even that is rarely enforced.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 07:08 AM
3

Says the coward who hides behind a new account. It's hypocrisy yet again.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 07:01 AM
3

Yes continue to vaguely allude to some problem without directly addressing it. Like I haven't heard that one before. Speak to the point, or get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 06:50 AM
5

We point out inequality in punishments that favour women. I don't see how that's hypocrisy. In fact that's the same thing feminists have been doing for decades, which is essentially pot calling the kettle black.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 06:38 AM
8

LOL! I'm arguing that point because I RESPECT women, and I don't treat them like weaklings who need the law to help them. By treating women as universal victims YOU are the one who is a misogynist, because you look down on women. Oh the irony!
/r/MensRights22/01/12 06:28 AM
4

I'm a 16-year old girl and I'm weak and can't make my own decisions regarding sex, so it's RAPE!!!! By the way, 16 years old is the age of consent in most countries around the world. You have a fucked up view about rape if you think having consensual sex with a 16 year old is rape.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 05:39 AM
7

I can't agree more. However what you are saying is pretty much extremely hard to achieve, because oppression doesn't just come from gender roles. It can originate from differences in wealth, class and power such that it makes gender oppression trivial. You need dedicated studies that factor out these forms of oppression and only focus on gender studies (which by the way, I haven't seen any form of fair study based on both genders). Who's going to conduct these studies on an unbiased basis? Also …
/r/MensRights21/01/12 09:07 PM
4

How can there be cooperation when both sides don't agree with each other on a basic level. Nearly all feminists believe in the patriarchy while nearly all MRAs don't. Try resolving that, then there might be progress.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 06:32 PM
9

You talk as if most of them can be reasoned with. Just like how they call female MRAs misogynists, they'll slap the same label on the author of this article.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 02:36 PM
3

I also don't see how you can make the conclusion that false rape accusations are nowhere as high as the MRM made it to be based on the percentage of rape conviction in Wales. All we are saying is we want due process for men accused of rape. Only convict if you are 100% sure. When you look at reports of men being falsely accused of rape and then exonerated years later, they all share the same problem: they are in jail because there wasn't any due process for them, it's all based on what the 'vict…
/r/MensRights21/01/12 02:08 AM
1

It's the classic statement of 'only my brand of feminism is right. Other feminists are wrong and do not represent feminism.'
/r/MensRights21/01/12 01:58 AM
2

Bear in mind that the seminar is one sided on purpose, focusing only about the presumption of guilt of men being accused of rape.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 01:55 AM
2

We should just start calling people who trivialize false rape accusations 'rape supporters'. That is essentially what they are saying right? It's okay for a few men to be jailed in a prison where there is a real rape culture and there is a high chance they are going to be raped.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 01:28 AM
1

That is exactly why modern feminism is so hypocritical. This is a perfect example of them thinking they can achieve equality between the sexes by focusing solely on women's issues. She went to the seminar with an obviously biased mindset and it's no surprise that she thought of everything only from her point of view and personal experience.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 01:17 AM
12

Don't you know that feminists understand men completely? We are rapists, hate women, are blind to privilege, violent, always abuse our superior strength, biologically deficient, emotionally dead and just intellectually inferior to women. Clearly, they also perfectly understand how society works, since they like to scream in our faces that we live in a rape culture and patriarchy where women are oppressed. If you think about it, nearly all those things fit the definition of a college frat boy, an…
/r/MensRights20/01/12 05:42 PM
1

I'll like to see a feminist tell me straight to the face that's equality and feminism is therefore about equality for both sexes.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 06:51 AM
-1

Don't cry rape if you willingly come onto me initiating sex please, especially if we are both drunk. Because you feminists only want me to be punished for it and not women who do the exact same thing. THAT's a clear case of you wanting privilege, and you still have the audacity to claim you want equality?
/r/MensRights20/01/12 06:37 AM
3

Not if she get caught by her rich boyfriend who she really wants to marry. She'll then cry rape and your ass will be in prison.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 06:31 AM
2

And IDs can be faked too, you are still guilty of the crime because the laws says so.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 06:30 AM
7

Fake IDs? It's still statutory rape even if the girl lied to you about her age.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 06:28 AM
7

I believe we should be more specific when referring to feminism. Are we referring to modern feminism, that uses dated ideology to whine and get superior treatment for women? Or the old feminism movement of the 70s to 90s where women actually demanded real equality and achieved success. Then there is also the feminism movement in countries where women are REALLY oppressed. This is very different from feminism in the US nowadays where feminists take the idea of "oppression" for granted and use it …
/r/MensRights19/01/12 09:37 AM
8

r/feminismS has more subscribers and more accurately reflects the feminist POV. Try posting there and see what happens.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 09:14 AM
8

The key difference is we are people on the internet who don't each other personally. That's why I made that statement. If I knew the OP personally I wouldn't be so quick to take sides.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 11:06 AM
7

I would rather believe him than dismiss his problems on the off chance he's lying. If that's what the feminist trolls are doing, then it's really too bad for them because they really aren't achieving anything. If anything it'll just get more supporters for the MRM.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 10:22 AM
5

Let's reverse the sex forced to join selective service and see if you'll make the same statement.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 12:23 PM
2

It's politically incorrect to be against feminism, that's why it's so hard to get people to think critically about these issues. All you need to do to discredit a MRA these days is just call them misogynists and people will just believe that. If you think about it, isn't that exactly what SRS have been doing? Playing the politically correct game while targeting r/mr all the time calling us names?
/r/MensRights15/01/12 11:20 PM
6

If you didn't realise by now, their premise is to defend women at all cost. It's not about real feminism or politically correctness, they just want to act like victims and so they can use it as an excuse for their own failures in real life. Society is misogynistic, that explains why I couldn't get a job! Why didn't I get into that science program in college? Because science faculties only accept men! I get paid less than my male colleagues, but I'm a woman and I have a right to work less and sti…
/r/MensRights15/01/12 10:30 AM
9

Mind giving examples of what the speaker said are examples of sexual harassment?
/r/MensRights14/01/12 06:59 AM
9

In public schools if someone touch your balls and you hit him back, you are the one going to get suspended or kicked out. Fucked up system is fucked up.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 06:57 AM
9

I thought they were just seen as universal victims, and this has nothing to do with maturity.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 06:55 AM
6

Stay classy, badasssss.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 04:15 PM
3

Actually that's a SRS troll account. They are trying to make us look bad so they can quote it and say all MRAs behave like that.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 10:35 AM
12

It's funny because feminists love to say the radical fems exist only on the Internet and the usual Not all feminist are like that. Then you point out real feminists are demanding change in laws and they still won't shut up and admit they are wrong. It's feminists like these that are really deluded.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 10:04 AM
5

If that's what you think MRAs think of women, then I've got news for you - you're fucking deluded.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 04:35 AM
-1

I agree that he presented a false image of MRAs, but he did concede the MRM is a proper movement that deserves attention, just like many feminist issues. What he suggest is we stop taking sides and look at the big picture, which is gender roles that is killing society. The feminists need to stop using patriarchy as an excuse for more rights and the MRM needs to stop opposing the entire premise feminism itself (or allow themselves to be seen as such) but to work together with feminists to iron ou…
/r/MensRights30/12/11 07:25 AM
-1

Still he has some valid points which deserve attention. I wish there is more discussion of that here but it seems very few people have commented so far.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 04:23 AM
1

Call them out on it.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:29 PM
-1

Strawman.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 12:12 PM
3

That is a pretty abstract statement. Can you provide some examples so I can understand better?
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:25 AM
11

Yup hide behind the shield of "humour" while continually professing your hatred of "cis white males" at every opportunity. You think that excuses your behaviour but it just makes you look hypocritical. Oh and I wouldn't go as far to classify you as a feminist. You are just another soulless moron from r/shitredditsays who think you deserve attention because you are a "victim".
/r/MensRights28/12/11 03:56 AM
1

You need to chill. What do Jews have got to do with race? As far as I'm concerned it's two separate issues.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 01:07 AM
3

I was up with you until you mentioned "Jewish monopolized media".
/r/MensRights28/12/11 12:54 AM
16

This is actually a good point. Reddit prides itself on being civil. Most rude posts get downvoted and subsequently dismissed even if they have a very valid point.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 12:22 AM
3

I sometimes wonder if they are intentionally trolling people in order to get attention for themselves to fulfil their emptiness that they face in the real world. Perhaps the mods are just trolls afterall.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 12:18 AM
4

If the patriarchy is real, why would it disadvantage men at all... I've heard feminists argue that the patriarchy hurts men too. After watching the video, I find that there seems to be a dissonance in understanding of the word patriarchy that feminists love to use and theamazingatheist's view of that word. Can someone explain to me why is there a difference? What exactly do the feminists mean when they refer to the patriarchy? Or is it just another vague term they use to justify their present mo…
/r/MensRights28/12/11 12:09 AM
4

Someone must have forgotten to take her schizophrenia pills again.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 11:59 PM
13

All attacks I've seen against r/mensrights have been ad hominem (particularly srs vendetta against our mod AnnArchist), strawman (MRAs opposes feminism, they must all hate women) or just general hivemind ignorance where some guy will say r/MR is misogynist and everyone goes along with it without knowing what the MRM is about. Sad to say, the most prominent one is probably the continual personal attack on AnnArchist's character.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 11:57 PM
11

Ad hominem To attack the person not the argument: "We should increase taxes", "Don't listen to him, he only showers once a week". Source: Handy guide of common logical fallacies.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 11:25 PM
1

Any links to what the mainstream feminists are up to?
/r/MensRights14/12/11 02:40 PM
1

Exactly, just like how some Christians view Atheists. Traitors.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 02:34 PM
3

I get my sources from SRS, they are the authority on truth and they are never wrong.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 02:09 PM
1

Here comes srs logic, vaguely allude to the idea that they are superior using sarcasm, without engaging in real debate. Yes ma'am, you are always right, we should all switch our brains with feminism speak because feminists are clearly superior. Then like a dog who bite and wouldn't let go, continue to insist you are right because of that false sense of superiority. You guys aren't achieving anything other than to get angry over small issues to validate your own beliefs. Surely you can't deny tha…
/r/MensRights12/12/11 05:20 AM
3

Pretty sure they are serious. Look how dedicated they are when you disagree with them. They'll follow you to the ends of the earth in order to prove themselves right and have the last word in any argument. Contrast with r/circlejerk, what happens in that subreddit stays in that subreddit.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 03:36 PM
2

Ignore them bro. Really the best way to deal with them is how you deal with the Westboro Baptist Church bigots - ignore them. You'll be happier.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 03:34 PM
3

Don't get fooled by SRS. They all use politically correctness to act superior to other people and they will never admit they are wrong. Ever. They use this false sense of self proclaimed superiority to judge other people and further their own agendas of man hating. They always say they see "misogyny all over the place", but it's more likely that they see the world through their rose-tinted glasses and made that conclusion. They go around looking for the tiniest bit of misogyny or racism and conc…
/r/MensRights11/12/11 03:28 PM
1

I thought she said in her apology that a whole new world was opened to her about the MRM and she understands what men are going through. Now it's all "obscure mens rights group" who have the audacity to call her out on bigotry and we're just overreacting to a "poor mother's fear of her daughter being molested by men".
/r/MensRights30/11/11 01:11 PM
4

They'll be the biggest hypocrites if they were to, but I wouldn't be surprised.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 12:39 PM
2

Fuck the downvotes, I agree with you.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 12:21 PM
1

They are hypocrites.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 12:18 PM
2

or NAWALT or not all feminists are like that. If everyone use that argument, feminism wouldn't even exist.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:19 PM
3

Notice she didn't bother to reply. There's your answer, she's a feminist troll who feels the need to validate her own twisted beliefs by trolling r/MR.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:18 PM
1

Next time tell her a woman's duty is to make her bf a sandwich and stay in the kitchen instead of going to school dance.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:16 PM
1

So many feminist trolls in this thread.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 01:30 PM
8

So you are saying it's okay when feminists posts facts about men, but when MRAs posts facts about women it's wrong and sexist? Well this ties in with the SRS line - whenever you say something about wome- SEXIST MISOGYNIST NECKBEARD PIGS! But when SRS says something sexist against men it's okay because MEN DESERVE IT PRIVILEGE PATRIARCHY MISOGYNIST RAPISTS BIOLOGICALLY INFERIOR VIOLENT MEN CAN STOP RAPE ALL WOMEN ARE VICTIMS.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 12:55 PM
3

She seems to acknowledge that it happens, but implied that it's a minority. In any case it's hard to tell what her stand on most issues are, because she often use scepticism to dismiss most MRA claims rather than come up with statistics to prove herself right.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 08:44 PM
1

Yea we both have no evidence as to who is right whatsoever. You can stand behind the defence "I didn't say that" all day, but it just doesn't prove you right at all when you said you don't think men getting screwed over by false rape allegations is true. However, hardwarequestions made a great point, which is even one man getting falsely accused of rape is too many. It might not justify the "overdrammatic" false rape culture you were so interested in discussing with Sigi1, but in the current cli…
/r/MensRights01/11/11 08:39 PM
2

It is implied here: http://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/comments/lu4me/oh_look_mras_making_rape_apologia_comments_in/c2w6ss9
/r/MensRights01/11/11 08:12 PM
4

Okay I should have been more precise in the thread title. She contests that such allegations destroying a man's life is in the minority. Really how often does this happen?
/r/MensRights01/11/11 08:04 PM
10

Yes, it's true that false rape allegations almost certainly destroy the life of the falsely accused Yes we have seen plenty of evidence on it here. How often does it happen though? It might just be a small percentage.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 08:00 PM
4

No I actually think she has a point. It might be true that we get a confirmation bias based on the fact that we frequently browse this subreddit. The question is how often do men get away unscathed without losing his job, reputation, family ties, etc when they get falsely accused of rape? It is important to answer this question and I think it's not an easy one to answer.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:54 PM
5

If by "everything" you meant your last point about confirmation bias, I'd give you that. It's presumptuous of you to assume I didn't keep that in mind.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:45 PM
7

Woah stalking me now. I'm flattered :)
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:30 PM
4

There are a few factors as to why I think it's too far detached from being a men's right issue. 1) These people are targeted not only because they are men, it's mainly because they are political figures. Everyone knows that, no one gives a shit about whether or not he's a man. When people hear such news, they always think of these powerful, rich men who indulge in politics. Naturally they don't associate such issues with themselves and think it won't happen to them. 2) Rich people tend to get aw…
/r/MensRights31/10/11 03:14 PM
3

Because women are oppressed in today's society earning lower wages while working equal hours and working the same dangerous jobs as men, getting the shitty end of the deal in DV, child custody, divorce cases, only 43% of women are getting into universities, more men managers in America. They also have to listen to men making jokes about them, since women NEVER EVER make jokes about cutting a man's penis off and never joke about men's dong being too small. Compelling reasons as to why in this pat…
/r/MensRights31/10/11 02:32 PM
1

The feminists love to attach lots of meanings to certain words and phrases designed to shame men. That's why we are constantly in debate with them over the meanings of rape culture or misogynists. They should really narrow down the words they used against us if they want us to take them seriously. Likewise, we should reduce the usage of misandrist and separate them into sexism, real misandry or just wilful ignorance of MR issues.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 02:07 PM
5

Why even give people like him attention? Don't give him page views, it's exactly what he wants us to do.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 01:59 PM
1

lol we're discussing China and you dragged India into it somehow. It's like discussing human rights in America and then dragging NK into it and complaining everyone isn't getting basic human rights treatment in the US because NK isn't getting any also. If you want to feel superior to us, at least use some proper logic. Edit: I love you!
/r/MensRights31/10/11 01:55 PM
-1

I love you!
/r/MensRights31/10/11 01:50 PM
2

Yup this has more to do with politics than men's rights.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 01:48 PM
8

Is this some fringe feminist group or a huge one? Did the article specify any specific industry they feel women are getting less pay? What sparked this movement? Do you have any stats (from Nina Smith) to back up the fact that women are getting paid more or less equitably if they chose the same job and worked the same hours?
/r/MensRights31/10/11 01:21 PM
5

Wouldn't they risk a lawsuit or something? (I am talking out of my ass here.) The Nordic countries are fiercely infamous for their feminist zeitgeist, wouldn't be surprised if there's some law that allows women to sue their employers for firing them based on their gender.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 01:00 PM
5

Good luck looking for a wife there. Due to the one child policy the ratio of men to women is 1.47:1.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 11:47 PM
1

Actually you are the sexist one. You can't see past your own sexism against men, and you think you are always right. It's called hypocrisy and you are absolutely blind to it.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 10:48 PM
3

Are you actually thinking when you posted that? There are women who abused the system the feminists have lobbied, that's why more and more men are getting wary of committing themselves to marriage. That is also exactly the reason why the MRM exists. Do you know that? Of course not. You are just here to troll, to prove yourself morally superior to us completely ignoring what we are saying and focusing your ire on the posts that you feel are misogynistic. What do you think that will achieve? NOTHI…
/r/MensRights30/10/11 03:26 AM
8

He's being sarcastic because that's what feminists love to scream at us.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 09:59 PM
4

Obviously Hugo is right, he's a PROFESSOR ffs. Professors can't be wrong can they? Professors are smart people and so they obviously know more than some blogger named Kyle. I know 3 neckbeards named Kyle (one is spelt Carl, mind) and they all can't seem to get a girlfriend, ever wonder WHY? Hahaha dumbo MRAs. You dumbos are just angry that women are smarter than men because there is equality today and more women are getting into universities with their own abilities. You should just shut up and …
/r/MensRights29/10/11 11:20 AM
-6

I think adding that the guy stopped after the woman repeatedly said no would have drawn you less ire from feminists. They assume the guy is going to continue and therefore scream RRRAAPEE.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 10:57 AM
5

It's satire. Originally I find him offensive, but now I just laugh when reading his posts just like I laugh when watching Colbert.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 10:51 AM
4

Hey now, how can you call her 12 to 16 year old intellectually? That's insulting to 12 year olds!
/r/MensRights29/10/11 09:44 AM
3

A man is a rape supporter if he promotes that women as a class are happier or more fulfiled if they have children. Amazing Atheist: Hey baby I was thinking you know, maybe we could have some kids. A son or daughter running around the house might be good, you know. I really like to be a daddy, I feel like our relationship is at that level. YOU FUCKING RAPIST! LOL
/r/MensRights28/10/11 10:43 PM
2

He definitely reads reddit. I've just finished watching 10 of his videos and he mentioned he debated some guy on the OWS issue on IAMA.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 09:36 PM
6

Hey get the fuck out if you have nothing to contribute. This man is in trouble and here you are nitpicking his grammar? Fuck you.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 09:22 PM
4

the Women's centre would spew at as many things as possible at the journalist to get as many things to stick as possible. If the genders were reversed, with men doing that, they would be labelled as misogynists immediately and publicly shamed. It's high time people take responsibility for what they say, especially when they are a woman's support group who represents women and feminism.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:43 PM
6

Slutwalk is actually a great campaign, but this woman managed to fuck it up by making it about her and totally throwing the slutwalk ideals out of the window.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:38 PM
9

I doubt you'll make her understand. There's a whole group of people supporting her - Dalhousie Women's Centre. On their front page (So much "logic" here, it's gold): We, the below signed, are writing to you in protest of the editorial written on October 7th, 2011, entitled “Smile, you’re at a protest.” As students, and members of the Dalhousie community, we are truly outraged at your publication which directly participates in victim blaming, and frankly, ignorant journalism. We find it is unethi…
/r/MensRights28/10/11 03:45 PM
1

They'll just cry NAWALT and all the radical feminists are just a small proportion of real feminism AND they turn around to make sexist judgement on all men by rehashing feminist logic.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 01:06 PM
3

Perhaps not as harsh as the OP suggested, but the current system is too lenient. We need to show them that these women who were conclusively proven to have falsely accused men of rape should not be tolerated and receive a heavy punishment because of how it hurts the male suspect and other real rape victims.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:24 AM
4

Is the case still ongoing? If she was found to have falsely accused you she'll most likely have to go to jail. Make sure you prove that she lied and sue her until she gets the maximum punishment under the law.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:16 AM
1

If the article didn't explicitly state that Jones had falsely accused another man for rape, I would have thought she stepped on someone's cat or something.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 12:05 AM
3

Actually the author is a man, who happens to be a professor in gender studies.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 07:18 PM
3

But not all women act like that do isn't it? It's feminism that campaigned for these unfair laws that allowed some women to take advantage. It's feminism's fault that shaped the social sphere too. Our target should be feminism, especially those who hold a position of power to spread misandry and lies. What I think should be done is to get women to not support the feminist movement blindly and start calling out their sexism, false logic and bogus statistics. There are women who have already start…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 03:21 PM
6

Another 1 week old account? This seems to be a common tactic of r/SRS, having multiple accounts so it'll seem like many people support your views AND you're afraid of getting downvoted. Dare to share your main account? Oh and btw, at least r/feminisms and r/mensrights are focused on learning about gender issues in the real world. You guys from r/SRS are just a bunch of people getting angry over things that was said on reddit. Kinda sad in my opinion. Also, you guys try to be politically correct …
/r/MensRights27/10/11 02:12 PM
2

I really think it would be more accurate to change the "women" to "feminists". It is important we stop confusing between the 2 groups, it's just giving the anti-MRAs more fuel to marginalise us. Otherwise, I agree with your concept when applied to feminism.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:14 AM
4

Until you stop equating opposing feminism as hating women.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:53 AM
5

This woman gets it.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 07:40 AM
5

This system unfairly makes women dependent on employers —and often on men and their employers—for our very survival. I honestly laughed out loud at this. These feminists are seriously deluded, they must be high when they wrote it. I believe the demands for "high quality education.. blah" is just a smokescreen to promote their feminist agenda. Not going to fall for their trap.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 07:36 AM
35

Oh the hypocrisy. For years feminists wanted equality by forcing laws to favour them, now they are complaining that men are getting special treatment for admission to colleges. It's all about women getting ahead at the expense of men. Also it's hilariously pathetic that men are again blamed for not being good enough so women have to compete with other women for the "small pool good men". Must be so tiring to compete because women have to marry up no matter what! Feminism spent years fighting aga…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:33 AM
6

Nah. You just see the inequality at the top 1% (only 16% women in House of Representatives or something) then you use that to believe women are still oppressed. Ignoring the fact that women are getting ahead in so many ways today. Also if you think it's a waste of time, don't come here. Saying you know these things but refusing to back yourself up is incredibly insulting and just proves you are here to look for a fight.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:15 AM
5

How is any of this damaging to men's rights? It was a discussion of the definition of patriarchy, and you subtly turned it into another topic so you can win the argument. Nice.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:02 AM
8

You reject all those because you FEEL you are 100% right. That's essentially what it is.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 05:55 AM
8

Here's what I don't get. Americans learn in school that violence is never allowed, even if the bully continues to harass you you are not allowed to fight back, if not you'll face a lengthy suspension. Then you have these women who are getting acquitted of their murders because their spouse bullied them. I think society needs to take a real look at the disconnect between the two.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 04:32 PM
1

You win the argument. Congrats and bye.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:19 PM
1

Wouldn't it be fairer to say that strict gender roles are brutally enforced on both men and women, and by men and women in the Middle East? And it still exists in America where men are often told to man up (you know the usual). I think I get your point.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:09 PM
1

And you were the one who threw insults around in the first place I might add: No offense but your lack-of-arguments and assertion that "No you're just wrong and I don't have to prove how" make you sound like a privileged white middle-class straight cis male who thinks he is oppressed because he's looked negatively on when he calls women 'cunts'. In other words, offense taken. It is more complex than that, but you apparently don't understand how it works. He called you out for being a name caller…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:06 PM
1

Calling someone all sorts of names (racist, homophobic, sexist, hateful nice guy) without a factual basis after having your ass handed to you sounds like a meltdown to me. You know you can't win, so you resort to name calling and ad hominem to validate yourself and make you feel better.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 12:52 PM
1

Please be wise enough to see that MRA is a worthy cause and is only hindered by the poor choices of Paul Elam. Seems to me you are only following up because you care about your name being on the register and his actions somehow hinders the MRM. If anything, I'm now more sure of the fact that your apology is just a smokescreen to fend us off and not actually acknowledging what a bigot you are.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 11:01 AM
2

How about the Middle Eastern countries? There is a huge oppression of women there. I do however am not in a position to say whether the same has happened in Western cultures, as I have not seen evidence of it.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 10:13 AM
2

What's your cause? Egalitarianism?
/r/MensRights26/10/11 10:08 AM
2

Always hilarious to see a dumbass do a complete meltdown.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 10:02 AM
3

If you really do, then go ahead and call us out. I was under the presumption that you don't care about mens rights, judging from my past interaction with people from SRS. I apologise.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 11:28 PM
3

It's sad, but please stay and call them out. I have called out misogyny in here before, and many others have been downvoted. Others just have a very low level of understanding of women or just don't treat women's rights as important. That's why it's important that you call us out when we act misogynistic, so we can improve.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 11:12 PM
1

Like I said, it's understandable given that most of us have been hurt whether it is by the unfair custody laws or DV laws that favour women. It would be daft to overlook this when browsing this subreddit. I agree that some of their hatred is directed unfairly towards women, but you have to understand. I reiterate, if you have no interests in mens rights issues, don't bother coming here. I'm not going over to your subreddit and nit pick every single comment that I don't like either.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 11:05 PM
2

Do you even open the links? 2 of the links you provided, the misogynistic comments are heavily downvoted. Not even worth getting angry about. The one about the slut shaming, I'd agree it's pretty despicable. However, you have to look at the most upvoted comment: I'm so goddamn sick of slutshaming. Obviously this post is fake, but can we please quit channeling all of our creative energy into embarrassing women for doing the same sort of shit we do? The slut/stud doublestandard is a little backwar…
/r/MensRights25/10/11 11:00 PM
2

Also, do you know what mens rights is about? If you don't and have no wish to do so, just leave us alone. You can go get angry at other people, we don't need people trying to prod us into saying something negative about women just so you can get angry and feel morally superior. In case you are wondering, openly misogynistic posts are often downvoted on r/mensrights. We can't claim to be completely free of them, but it's understandable given that most of us have been hurt whether it is by the unf…
/r/MensRights25/10/11 10:50 PM
2

XXX says something slightly negative about women. SRS: #$#(&$ MUST HATE ALL THE MENZ. (insert sarcastic comment about men) Basically that's what your subreddit is all about. Change the women to blacks or other minorities if you think I'm generalising by saying it's only about women. Ours is not and is actually based more on defending mens rights issues that occur in the real world. Not based on solely getting butthurt about some random comment on the internet. That's not to say we don't get angr…
/r/MensRights25/10/11 10:39 PM
2

http://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/ Code Gray.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 10:17 PM
0

Had this been a female victim, you would be up in arms about how that men rapist is a pedophile and all sorts of bullshit. When are you ever going to apply the same standards you apply on men to women? I guess never.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 12:04 PM
0

I agree with you. Just curious, what's your opinion on the age limit of teachers having sex with students? I don't get why there should be a special age limit (18 years old) in schools.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 11:58 AM
-1

It might not be rape. At the end of the article it says they had sex twice, sounds more likely to be consensual. You might still be right though. I agree that it's absolutely ridiculous he's already ordered to pay $50 a month despite the rape case not concluding. Even if the custody is given to the woman, the government should be paying the money until he graduates and gets a job. I can't tell if it's the justice system failing or simply the laws are fucked.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 11:56 AM
3

Girlwriteswhat and rantgrrl are regular contributors. You can't say we don't welcome women.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 09:33 AM
2

Typical SRS' logic. One guy saying something = all men said it. Crazy bitches.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 09:32 AM
0

Yea and the world's population is still increasing, doesn't look like we are dying out anytime soon. If anything, we are probably gonna kill ourselves with overpopulation. Seems like that's what you want ain't it?
/r/MensRights25/10/11 09:13 AM
-1

There are many ways for people to contribute to mankind where future generations can benefit. I'm sure you can understand that. Having kids is just one way.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 10:30 AM
1

Is there a huge potential benefit to mankind to increase the population, given the global trend of population explosion in developing countries? The earth's resources are being used up rapidly, I think the potential damage they will cost far outweighs the benefits. If you are talking about the relationship of the economy and the aging population where lesser young people of working age are now supporting more elderly people, that's down to the shit economic system which is based on spending futu…
/r/MensRights24/10/11 10:12 AM
-1

I laughed. Honestly. Ignoring the fact that the world population has been increasing exponentially, ignoring the fact that it's your family's personal choice to have kids and pretending like having kids is for some sort of grandiose agenda. Yea those families who decide to have kids totally did it for mankind! compared to someone who does not help keep the human race alive There are more than one way to contribute to humankind! Having kids is just one of them. Having more kids than you can affor…
/r/MensRights24/10/11 09:59 AM
1

You nailed it. They also tend to use sarcasm as a way to express hatred of men because they won't have to explain much, which prevents themselves from getting called out easily. If they do get called out, they'll just say we should man up and be able to take a joke, since we (all) do it too (which is bullshit). Can't imagine such deluded people exist and in droves too, judging by the subscription rate of SRS.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 09:40 AM
6

I only made that statement because the article was about women demanding "mummy salary", hence I addressed it to the women who agree that they are entitled to that. If you can only choose between having a successful career and having kids, then pick one and be content with it. I'm not under the impression that that meant all women cannot both have a successful career and raise a kid. I'm at a loss as to why people would think I meant that. I wasn't referring to all women here. All I was saying i…
/r/MensRights23/10/11 08:06 PM
-4

If you can only choose Looks like you need glasses.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 07:20 PM
1

I have nothing more to say to people with prejudices against me and will not accept that maybe they themselves are wrong.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 04:03 PM
-7

Yes because saying something against women = hate women. Fuck off. It's this mentality that pisses me off. You want to appear fair but you assume the worst of MRAs before we even speak. In my country, women get 4 months maternity leave while men get 2 days. ALSO, in most countries women simply get more time off, which is natural. For those where men get more, it's only because their employers are allowed to pay them less salary during the period. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parental_leave Got a…
/r/MensRights23/10/11 03:34 PM
-3

YOU shut the fuck up. Did you take into account the difference in paternity leave duration? Go fuck off if you just want to dismiss my points by focusing on little details that you can't even get right. Also, give me a reply on my first point, if not go find something else to hate on r/SRS, you'll belong there.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 03:23 PM
-7

Women, it's your choice to get married and have kids. If you can only choose between having a successful career and having kids, then pick one and be content with it. You are already given paid maternity leave in most first world countries for a choice you made at the expense of your employers and colleagues, so don't expect more things to be handed to you on a plate.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:47 AM
3

Do you think we should just scrap the title of MRA and just call ourselves egalitarians? The author seems to think so: So, I’m not sure that the feminist movement needs men or women at this point. I think its ideology is due for being replaced with something a bit more gender-realist, something that acknowledges that there are differences between the sexes and that the women actually like it that way aren’t brainwashed. Moving towards an egalitarian society seems to be the next logical step for …
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:39 AM
4

The court found that "most of the women were psychologically unstable" and Skoglund had "taken advantage of the women's poor psychological states and longing for human contact". We should really stop slapping these labels on women when they make mistakes, it's sexism and don't excuse them from their mistakes at all.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:01 AM
3

May I know where you're from? Why were you required to sign "that paper" which would require you to be enlisted if the draft were to be reinstated?
/r/MensRights22/10/11 09:28 PM
1

I concur. Not sure if war pictures are a recent trend in r/MR, but most of them serve little purpose other than to evoke pure emotion and blind hatred towards feminism and sometimes women while (more importantly) providing little to no specific issue for us to discuss (the picture itself may cover a wide range of issues). Which war does the picture reference? Are we discussing drafts? There are many countries with drafts, some are mandatory and some are only activated during war times, which cou…
/r/MensRights22/10/11 07:06 PM
1

I have no problem with the mastermind receiving a heavier punishment, but not when I also read that "the women were in poor mental states and have desire for human contact". That excuse might work for 1 woman, but 43 women all having the same mental problem? Clearly sexism against women has worked in their favour here.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 06:49 PM
1

Kid, labelling someone as misogynist is a huge thing. Free speech is great but you can't just go around calling people that indiscriminately then saying "hehe just a joke". You'll understand when you grow up.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 09:21 AM
3

Please do browse this subreddit from time to time, you will find that mens' rights issues are legitimate and not based on hatred towards women. Being against certain facets of feminism does not mean we hate women, I think it's important to say this because a lot of feminists on reddit seems to think we do. There have been occasions where I've seen misogyny in this subreddit, mostly due to anger at some of the issues that victimise men, but they are usually called out and downvoted. All we want i…
/r/MensRights20/10/11 09:08 AM
14

"It has become a kind of religion that you can't criticise because then you become a traitor to the great cause, which I am not. This is why feminists hate the MRM, why they think they are always right and why they allow themselves to be so openly obnoxious and hypocritical. If we show ourselves to be seen as even remotely against feminism, we are automatically labelled as oppressors of women who don't want equality for women when in fact sometimes, it's really these feminists themselves who wan…
/r/MensRights20/10/11 08:38 AM
2

I'm so going to start quoting codes when replying to feminist speak.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 07:53 AM
2

Your fear is not based on truth, but unwarranted sexism from feminist lies. The author made up statistics from thin air (99% rape came from men) and this fear mongering made you afraid. It's easy to believe her because that's what society believes too.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 07:51 AM
2

That's fair enough.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 11:56 AM
1

What do you think of this case?
/r/MensRights18/10/11 11:17 AM
17

Dude I'm a yellow skinned Asian guy and I didn't notice any racism here. If this subreddit was really about White Supremacy I would have abandoned it long ago.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:19 PM
1

Wait so you are saying having female characteristics is weak? Cos that's what a "fag" has. Are you looking down on women?
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:13 PM
2

If this was a man, his daughter would be with CS services now while his ass will be sitting in jail.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 11:30 AM
6

We hold a mirror in front of them and they still simply refuse to see how pathetic they are. To them, it's all about winning the argument at all cost, having the last word which they think gives them the win or just twisting the argument with straw men arguments all the time. I'm fucking sick of them, their twisted sense of moral justice they think they rightfully possess based on the fact they they are "victims" to act like the douche bags they are.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 11:25 AM
1

Overuse of sarcasm just makes you look stupid. Try posting real arguments, if not don't post at all.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 11:18 AM
2

I'm not surprised. Just look at how much at Scandinavian model wife of Tiger Woods got from the divorce ($750 million). She did absolutely nothing to earn that amount of money. It's things like these that encourage vanity from women. Dress pretty, put lots of makeup that completely changes your face, maintain your body then find a rich husband. If you feel like you want out, just get divorced and still get alimony and custody of the kids (which TW's wife did).
/r/MensRights16/10/11 10:49 AM
10

This is the conclusion I was hoping she would make (It's the exact same article submitted a few days ago): http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/l88z1/all_the_single_ladies/c2qlop6 Posted by godlessaltruist I think that's the key point the author is missing. When she was younger, she lived in abundance, and she took this for granted. Men lined up at her door, and she assumed they always would. She didn't recognize that eventually the balance would shift in favor of the men, and that the am…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:51 PM
20

That's a pretty long article to state that she has high standards and she doesn't want to stay single but is resigned to do so.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 04:20 PM
1

The statement itself is a very broad statement. I can have other reasons for not listening to a woman other than the fact that she's a woman. The author explains it very well in fact, talking about those reasons, but she concluded it poorly by saying these reasons are why not listening to a woman is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:35 AM
3

FeministMath is obviously being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 04:02 AM
4

Please fuck off. This is not a thread for you retards to rain on!
/r/MensRights15/10/11 03:03 AM
4

To be honest a protection order would not have stopped this woman. She has already decided to kill the duo.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 02:52 AM
3

That's interesting. Can you do an AMA? There was recently one XY woman who did an AMA, but I doubt many would have heard of a XX guy.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 03:40 PM
19

Not only that, I name every single drug beforehand and get her to sign a legally binding contract specifying her consent to engage in volunteering sexual intercourse with me. It's all part of the new foreplay procedures in the manual written by the great and always right feminist Aerik.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 02:43 PM
3

I've quickly browsed through onetimer's history, she seems to be a feminist and right wing evangelical christian who is particularly intolerant of homosexuals and transsexuals. She also continues to allege that we hate women. Little wonder why her overall comment karma is negative.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 02:19 PM
3

Don't they find it ironic? Feminists say men and MRAs are all evil monsters who resort to violence, but look at who's the one threatening violence. Each and every day, I find something a little more crazy about these radical feminists. "Thanks in advance" sounds like something a psychopath would say.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 01:54 PM
6

It's hilarious really... I made a post yesterday about how they label all MR activists based on individual posts made by certain MRAs, then one feminist from SRS made a huge post denying it. Then now they come in and prove me right! Apparently to them the views of "4_christ" is representative of the whole of MRM. I don't understand this cognitive dissonance, how they can say one thing yesterday then take another position the next day. Sadly, this is just the tip of the iceberg.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 01:44 PM
1

Your presence and continued interest in mens rights issues will be valuable to us. One day we will force change, nothing can stop truth. As long as we continue to do what we believe in, we will have nothing to lose, unlike those feminists who will at the end of their lives die knowing they have been living a lie.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 12:13 PM
18

This is just more evidence that feminism is a religion and no longer about asking for equal rights for women. They remind me so much of scientologists, resorting to completely bogus statistics and universal lies as their version of "dynatics" and their bullying tactics of attempting to attack the character of whoever is saying the truth (ad hominem attacks)
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:52 AM
0

Ignore those with the trolls tag, they aren't here to learn anything, they are here to prove us wrong. No matter what you say, they will never accept it.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:22 AM
6

Don't reply to the crazy trolls, they will never learn to keep their mouth shut and will never ever think they are wrong. Ignoring them is the best way for now, we can visit them in a mental institution years later and laugh at them then.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 06:06 AM
4

No need to apologise, you raise a valid point. Some people are just too god damned sensitive. I'm Asian and I see lots of Asian discriminatory jokes on reddit but I don't give a damn about it.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:58 AM
3

The husband will have to pay her legal fees too. Don't believe me? It's documented.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:26 PM
3

You can put 2 and 2 together and conclude some form of sex act involving a dildo or finger is used. That is not the important part however. The offender did not disclose the fact that she was actually a woman, which is the same as a trans woman not disclosing her status as a transsexual. In both cases the sexuality of the "offender" did matter to the "victims". Go ahead and prove me wrong, I'm very open to criticism as I'm still learning. I don't want to lose out in that just because of some bia…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:09 PM
3

Since you are so insistent on using this whole trans debate to judge r/MR, have you seen this? The feminists are strangely silent on this one: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-11428560
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:51 PM
1

Unfortunately, I'm not retarded or crazy, so I won't trust you.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:35 PM
1

You guys are trying to use it to prove your not all homophobic/transphobic assholes(which isn't working). See? Already trying to make us look bad.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:28 PM
2

I think those guys are just a bunch of assholes. I've played high school basketball with girls before and when guys accidentally knocked down girls we offer them a hand and make out, then get on with the game. Might have been because I came from a better school though, I don't know.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:13 PM
13

I'm inclined to agree with the rest of the article except this: Because this is a statement of fact: Not listening to women is a misogynist act. That statement by itself implies anybody who doesn't listen to a woman is a misogynist, no matter what reason one may have for not doing so. That simply isn't true unless the only reason a person doesn't want to listen to a woman is because on her gender. Basically, it's a pretty broad statement to make.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 01:46 PM
5

Actually the downvote brigade is just an effect of their existence. Their raison d'etre is simply just to get angry so they can feel self validated. Always putting themselves on a higher moral ground, failing to see that we are all in fact on the same ground. They're the pot, we're the kettle. Why do I say that? Because we aren't perfect too. There are misogynists in this subreddit, just like there are misandrists in SRS and we should call them out when we see them. That said, I choose to believ…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 01:26 PM
1

YES we should! Really they are like the Westboro cultists, ignoring them is the best way to deal with them.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 12:17 PM
8

I think both sides should cool down, and no one banned. Sex is a big thing for both transsexuals and men, that is why we are all so agitated. What we need to do is cool down and try to see each other's points. There is no point in getting so angry and trying to prove your point, in the end both sides end up not listening to each other and we all lose. It's also interesting amidst all these, the feminist cupcakes took their opportunity to chime in and make us look bad so they can gain support fro…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 12:15 PM
2

That's true, but SRS themselves are in no position to tell us we are wrong when they themselves break redditquette on daily basis by linking to posts by other redditors then proceed to mass downvote them. They insist they don't downvote and go as far as to warn people not to downvote on their sidebar, but it's just a smokescreen for their reddiquette breaking actions.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 11:50 AM
8

People from SRS are such huge hypocrites. They complain about others being bigots and sexists, but when it comes to themselves they fail to see that they are also bigots and sexists. When you beat them at an argument, they refuse to admit they are wrong and retreat to their own subreddit for sanctuary and everyone will agree with them so they feel right, become rejuvented and find some other posts to get angry at. They also refuse to admit they are a downvote brigade, when it's so obvious they a…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 11:34 AM
0

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-11428560
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:15 AM
3

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-11428560 Tell those victims that. If not you just have to admit you have double standards.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:14 AM
1

Feminists, are you going to tell those victims to their face that they are bigots? Go on. You believe it so strongly, go ahead. What, you aren't going to? No way! What's that? (me leaning in with hands behind my ear) Because the victims are women? Oh you!
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:59 AM
1

FYI, lower number of hours worked, working jobs that give less wages are some of the reasons why women earn less. These are widely quoted reasons and statistics backed up by research.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:43 AM
2

Looks like the r/againstmenrights and r/SRS downvote train passing through again.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:38 AM
2

There are women who try http://niamhgriffin.blogspot.com/2011/09/can-men-and-women-play-on-same-football.html Not really professional sports here, but over the years I've seen 1 or 2 articles about women wanting to play in professional men's soccer, since we are talking about gender and sports here I'd just thought it might be an interesting topic.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 01:45 PM
11

Oh come on, can you please read what you say before you post? You can share your hatred for women somewhere else, here is not the place for it. Unless you are being sarcastic, for which you forgot your /s tag. I doubt it though, I've seen you post like this quite a few times already.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 01:21 PM
4

I know this article is about high school sports, but what do you guys think of women who want to compete in professional men's sports? I'm not really a fan of women competing in professional men's sports. By doing so they are taking away another man's spot in the team or in single player sports like tennis their chances of making the major tournaments, it's not fair that these women get extra chances such that if they fail to play up to standard in men's sports, they'll always have something to …
/r/MensRights12/10/11 01:18 PM
4

There is no evidence that she lied, they simply couldn't prove it. Everyone knows that she did lie, but the justice system requires absolute proof in order to convict. Although a strange parallel can be drawn from the fact that it was her word which was much effective against his initially and could have been if not for the security cameras at the airport. In this case no hard evidence of Gonzalez having committed rape but he was nearly sentenced for it. That is the unfairness of the system, but…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 06:48 AM
4

Evidence as to why we cannot allow such bogus laws to be passed: http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/27/local/la-me-accused-20110628
/r/MensRights11/10/11 10:23 PM
0

More evidence that people like you don't want equality. Instead of whining about the failures of men, it's time for women of today to start taking responsibility.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 10:06 PM
7

Ignore them, going against people like them is just a waste of time. Just delete your OKC profile if you are uncomfortable with these stalkers.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 09:59 PM
2

Interesting that you are so accepting of my arguments unlike what was said about you by some of the people here. I admit I did align your position with some of the other feminist trolls in here, which is why I made that statement. I apologize for that and look forward to future discussions with you. With regards to rape culture, I don't think most of us here support that. Some of us do but I assure you I would call them out if I see it.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 04:49 PM
10

I dunno man, she seems to have given up on marriage towards the end of the article, having written so much about older single women.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 04:36 PM
8

Nicely sums up the idea that feminism today is not about asking for more social and legislative rights for women, it's all about control over men. They fail to see the irony of asking men to "get married" or "put down the iPhones on the train and read a book" when they go around asking men not to tell them what to do! Ladies who think this way, I respect your decision to get a proper education and not get married, so don't tell me what to do too.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 01:01 PM
6

I've said this earlier today and I'll say it again. The problem I have with the feminist's definition of rape culture is the idea that making sexist jokes and objectifying women leads to rape. It simply isn't true. Rapists rape not because people are making sexist jokes or objectifying women. Rapists rape because they are rapists and they want to exert control over their victims sexually. Note that I used the word victims and not women, because women can be rapists and men can be victims too. Th…
/r/MensRights11/10/11 12:44 PM
1

It's not a denial, it's your constant inaccurate attribution of problems to the "patriarchy" that is the problem. Blaming patriarchy for everything that goes wrong. The problem I have with the feminist's definition of rape culture is the idea that making sexist jokes and objectifying women leads to rape. It simply isn't true. Rapists rape not because people are making sexist jokes or objectifying women. Rapists rape because they are rapists and they want to exert control over women sexually.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 05:07 AM
5

You are making the assumption having women as "leaders of the pack" will solve the problem. This is a class issue and NOT a patriarchal issue. These men are seen as useless and society won't help them.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 04:53 AM
2

It's YOU who need to stop focusing on every little thing that is remotely negative and hating everyone just based on that little part. IT's extremely damaging to your mental health to do that, trust me I've been there before.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 04:14 AM
1

If having kids really carry such a high weight, how about every women forced to have a quota of at least 1 kid to make up for men dying for them? That would be entirely fair right?
/r/MensRights10/10/11 01:14 PM
2

I think they are mistaking easy for dumb. These girls act dumb, thinking it makes them more desirable but it actually just makes them look easy to get instead. Guys naturally flock to easier to get girls.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 12:38 PM
1

It's sad that the author goes off on a tangent on attacking women for being sluts, I do not agree with that. He has some unique perspective the MRM but focusing an entire section on calling females sluts really just pushes people away.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 12:20 PM
3

I don't doubt there are misogynists in this subreddit but your actions are not the way to solve the problem. Also, you are not just trolling a single person, you are trolling everyone including sensible posters like girlwriteswhat (who is female btw and would have the natural incentive to want equal rights for women too). Do you think you are really helping us to "see the light"? Stop focusing only on the negative aspects of MRM and engage in discussions with the proper, intelligent posters. The…
/r/MensRights10/10/11 12:16 PM
2

That's kinda sad. Next time you happen to encounter incidents where you have given up your seat and the lady gets offended, just make a loud sarcastic remark "Common courtesy is dead and women killed it."
/r/MensRights10/10/11 12:12 PM
4

Nope. It's women who selfishly don't want to volunteer to take the place of men, and hence they are the ones directly responsible for men dying in wars. It's the matriarchy at work! Men are the victims here and it's up to women to stop men from dying. Women are evil and must be stopped. They are weaker and so they think it's okay for them to escape from national service, resulting in more men dying. Women are at fault for everything! PS: In case you guys don't know, I was being sarcastic and pos…
/r/MensRights10/10/11 12:01 PM
5

Is this the kind of argument you feminists can come up with? Try harder if you want to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 10:57 PM
52

As a guy who had to serve 2 years of national service when my female counterparts go off to university, this hits close to home. The worst thing is when people start using females giving birth as a national valuable resource as an excuse for them not having to serve. Makes me rage. The only country that forces both males and females to serve is Israel, AFAIK.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 10:50 PM
1

>Actually, it’s not, but we’re in a bad time. The angry lynch mob who would have hunted witches in the past has learned the trick of passive aggression. Instead of calling you a witch, they claim you’re intolerant of witches. Their goal is to tear down those who rise above and humble them. >The feminist movement is part of this, as are various other victim movements. They are those who destroy civilizations. Under the guise of doing things “for the good of humanity,” they’re selfish, because the…
/r/MensRights09/10/11 06:53 PM
15

Honestly, do you guys get that often? I'm a guy from a first world country in Asia and don't see such behaviour. The worst is they don't acknowledge me when I hold doors open for women. (I hold for everyone.)
/r/MensRights09/10/11 05:47 PM
1

It's the dailymail. It's a well known tabloid that sells sensationalism. Everyone in the UK knows it.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 11:20 AM
6

“The law treats men and women as being equal when it is obvious that in these matters, the men are the stronger ones.” How about a woman getting a guy inebriated then forcibly giving him a blowjob? That's rape too. Strength means fuck all here. It's simply a myth that women cannot rape and strength is the end all be all of rape.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 10:12 AM
0

Trolololololol lololololooololol La di da! Wait did someone speak?
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:33 PM
1

It has little to do with men rights and is more of a decision made by a private business. If they want to let girls in so be it. It's unfair (and illegal), but will you feel validated when they get an infraction and everyone becomes unhappy? It's not like them getting attention from police is going to help your chances of getting into the bar. Just let it go and wait for your turn. Shit's unfair, but there are better times to take action.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:22 PM
9

I understand their point but their name literally means "against women rights". It's an unfair concept towards women and doesn't really belong in the MRM. If we continue to associate with them it might scare people away. By the way, r/againstmenrights, your name is fucking pathetic.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:12 PM
5

No. It's not up to men to stop rape. It's up to rapists to stop rape. Not all men are rapists. Because by saying "it's up to men to stop rape", these feminists are implying all men are rapists, and from that twisted logic they are saying it's up to ALL men to stop rape, which is very sexist as it assumes ALL men are potential rapists. A female can be a rapist too.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:04 PM
1

Strictly speaking that IS sexist against men. No seats were reserved or men but seats were reserved for women at the expense of men. Honestly I wouldn't read too much into this. India is a fucking corrupt country and their issues have little to do with feminism and MRM in developed countries.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 02:48 PM
7

I couldn't read this article at all. Too much sexism and double standards for me to digest. I guess it's an article aimed at women so it's none of my business.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 02:42 PM
2

It's tied to the statement preceding that, which is these feminist assume ALL men are potential rapists. That is a sexist view as not all men are rapists. You aren't wrong, it is certainly up to a potential rapist to not commit rape, but I was actually pointing out the sexism involved in the statement that it is up to men to stop rape.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 08:56 AM
6

Now, it's true I've never seen this phrase before so perhaps that really is the intended meaning. I very much doubt it though. You think feminists -- women-are-just-as-strong-as-men feminists -- are going to be propagating that the big strong men swoop in to save the poor, delicate lady? I don't think that's what the phrase means. The phrase attempts to put blame on all men being potential rapists, and it's up to men to control themselves so they don't commit rape. That's what I think the femini…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 05:30 AM
3

Well all we know is her son and daughter appeared to back up her statement. There were "millions of violent outbursts that were happening everyday" and he was "violent, unpredictable and always armed". "Violent outbursts" can mean being extremely fierce and "abuse" can refer to emotional abuse, which is not an excuse for murder. He's also a police officer, of course he's always armed. All these are extremely vague terms which may or may not be grounds for acquittal. If you were to force me to ch…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 05:24 AM
1

That's not the point. The point is the laws and justice system are so favourable to women to the point they can be exploited this way. That's why it's so important to have more gender equality in laws. There has to be an acknowledgement that there are bad people from both genders, not just men.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 03:34 PM
2

Funny because that's exactly how feminism works, by shouting and getting their followers to cry victim every single time a potential opportunity occurs (which is every single time a bad thing happens to a woman).
/r/MensRights04/10/11 03:29 PM
25

Can anyone explain to me why the woman wouldn't receive the same punishment as the man if he was convicted of the "crimes" if it was proven beyond a shadow of the doubt that she lied? I understand that that isn't the case because it discourages real rape victims to come forward. However, there is a difference between lying and merely lack of evidence to convict the man. If she was found to have directly lied about the rape and kidnapping, then I believe she should be registered as a sex offender…
/r/MensRights03/10/11 03:06 PM
2

What do you mean by busted down? Did you mean he was punished for being raped?
/r/MensRights03/10/11 11:23 AM
1

RTFA, she has been convicted and imprisoned since 1991! Please do not make blanket statements accusing us for being biased when it's clear you didn't even bother to read the article. In this case you are the one who jumped to the defense of this mentally sick woman and convicted murderer supporting her release. WTF is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights03/10/11 11:16 AM
2

Reading your comments will reveal to me a whole new world of conspiratorial inanity and insanity, the likes of which is not seen anywhere else except r/amr.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 10:57 PM
3

Sure anti feminist conspiracy. Because anyone who dare to speak out against feminism is equated as opposing all women right? That's the vibe you give out and that is not what we are doing. Stop thinking you women or feminists are always right. You are not. That goes to all the anti men rights people out there. Learn to differentiate and not play the victim every time someone speaks out against you.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 10:56 AM
3

I can't believe someone can be so fucking retarded that he can post this kind of shit. You trying to say that homeless man looking for scraps in bins is more privileged than Michelle Obama? Seriously go say it to anyone you know, I bet you wouldn't dare unless the gang you hang out with is as retarded as you.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 10:51 AM
10

I didn't notice any homophobic stuff in here. If they are they should be called out and downvoted. The LGBTs already have their own special group and even their own subreddit, I don't see the point of having their issues covered here. If the issue concerns men in general then yes they should be posted here, whether or not the man in question is a homosexual. However if the issue is specifically about gays then submitting it to r/lgbt would be more appropriate as they will be able to understand a…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:54 PM
2

Link to the article.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:09 PM
9

So it's okay now for women to start kicking men in the balls just because they feel like it and get away scott free? I'm never ever going to New Zealand.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:14 AM
1

Fuck me, I completely misread your post. Sorry :(
/r/MensRights29/09/11 04:20 PM
2

I accidentally knifed that guy, opps! Just an accident guys! See how dumb your statement is? Even if it's an accident charges should be pressed against her for serious assault. EDIT: Please ignore and downvote my post.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 03:29 PM
9

She should definitely be charged based on the fact that she tried to seriously injure another person. The justice system has failed in NZ.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 10:25 AM
3

Nah she's not a feminist. She's a sexist bigot who thinks she represents ferminism. True feminism has long been beat down by people like her.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 09:54 AM
1

It's not that they want you to reassure them that you aren't mad at them. It's them wanting to play white knight and getting on your good side to show how good they themselves are.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 06:56 PM
1

I see your point, but I also think the OP's rant is valid because she has personally seen men who use feminist idealism to control girls. They implant false ideas in a woman's mind in order to instil a siege mentality, which is very unhealthy when one keeps thinking of herself as a victim when they are actually not. The true goal of (pure) feminism and the MRM is equal rights for everyone and such people represent the antithesis of that. They should be rightly called out and shamed. It has littl…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 06:42 PM
4

Women wonder why men didn't wanna let them vote. Look how easily manipulated they are. All i have to do is point and say those people are the source of all your problems, and they just build up an attack machine and go to war without even fuckin thinking about it for themselves, because I through some mysterious penis power have justified their anger. They just accept the false premise and the bogus statistics and engage. Woah calm down! Breathe in and relax! Okay. Not all women are easily manip…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 06:29 PM
9

Besides being a totally, totally unfair law, with this being a STATE fund (I could care less if this was a private fund), I can totally foresee men using their wives to make such loans. Not only is this going to reward useless women for being useless (those who go bankrupt and fail to repay the loan), married men are going to have access to it too. Are there any links to this?
/r/MensRights24/09/11 09:47 AM
4

A man speaks. Feminists: THAT'S SEXIST!
/r/MensRights22/09/11 09:54 AM
2

Instead you say "we better hide that guy from the world at large so nobody can criticize us!" It's hypocritical of you to call us that, the fact is that you can still comment in this subreddit while we cannot do so in your pathetic little subreddits. You are also completely ignoring the fact that men are getting the short end of the stick in terms of law here, such as men getting screwed over by custody laws because the feminist laws assume women to be better than men even if there's evidence su…
/r/MensRights22/09/11 09:44 AM
5

Anyone who post there with an inkling of supporting men rights will be banned. They know their beliefs don't have much truth to them so the only thing they can do is silence people. For the record, I was banned too.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 09:18 AM
7

I'm sure there's totally not enough breast cancer coverage in the media already that these feminists are butthurt over men getting a little attention for prostate cancer. These fucking feminists want equality to the point they can sacrifice the health of men just so they can been seen as equal. FUCK OFF AND DIE. Everyone knows what breast cancer is already with your frequent pink whatever campaigns so what's wrong with letting these health groups promote awareness about prostate cancer? If you s…
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:31 PM
3

I have no knowledge of prison culture, but why don't they just separate all inmates so that such things don't happen, for example put them in solitary confinement? It's like they are knowingly allowing these fights and rapes to go on without caring about it.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:22 PM
1

Screams of double standard to me. Your wife want equal rights yet still want chivalry from men. Basically, she wants the best of both worlds. You should get her to read this opinion piece by girlwriteswhat. Get her to understand that there has to be and already has been a change in gender role of today's men as a result of the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:17 PM
-8

I agree, it's double think behavior. They may not necessarily believe that we don't hate women, but they suddenly believe we do (hate women) when it comes to us opposing certain feminist issues. It's an annoying and convenient lapse of thinking that years of feminist teachings have imprinted in their minds so they are incapable of thinking on their own when it comes to men rights issues that clash with theirs. That's why women who join on board the MRM train (rantgrrl and girlwriteswhat) are so …
/r/MensRights21/09/11 05:08 AM
-9

I don't agree with certain things the OP said and you need to understand that he is not representative of the MRM. The problem I have with the feminists on reddit is their devotedness to be against men rights to the point of creating a subreddit just for that in addition to their frequent trolling of our subreddit with nonsense. They also refuse to accept our points when proper facts and arguments are presented to them, frequently relying on name calling and denial of having said something when …
/r/MensRights21/09/11 02:46 AM
-28

The crazy feminist brigade here don't see it that way though. Us having a criticism of feminism = we hate women and don't want equal rights for them. I can't see anything else that could explain their behavior.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 01:57 AM
1

This coming from someone on their eternal period? HA!
/r/MensRights21/09/11 01:42 AM
4

This is making me rage. I'm sure the court would rule in your favour eventually if she's unable to provide any evidence. Did you keep the messages that she sent? The conversation history will be the key, from reading what you said it would be important evidence to paint her as a desperate teenager who has continually harassed you. Make sure to have backups in case the website deletes your profile. Also once you get acquitted sue the fuck out of her and the state for the damages caused + lawyer f…
/r/MensRights20/09/11 08:14 AM
5

You are correct in the purest sense of the word. Misandry means hatred of males and circumcision of males have nothing to do with that. What we should be looking at is sexism, which says it's okay to circumcise males and not females. Both are disgusting and should be stopped without the consent of the victim.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 07:31 AM
8

Most of the feminist arguments against MR issues I have seen so far are as follows: first blame everything on male privilege and patriarchy = ALL MALES BENEFIT AND ALL FEMALES SUFFER. Then when proper facts and counter arguments are presented to them, they start name calling and blame men for downvoting them or "mansplaining". When driven into a corner because they realised they have been living on lies from the feminist propaganda machine, they start denying everything they said and blaming MRA…
/r/MensRights18/09/11 05:38 PM
3

And you just got quoted on r/againstmenrights. Knowing that they are fighting a losing battle to win MRA on logic, they are just focusing on taking things out of context and getting angry over it, hilarious. In this case they get angry because "you have the gall to call a woman to get in the kitchen!". BITCHES READ THE FULL SENTENCE!
/r/MensRights17/09/11 04:24 PM
2

they try to beat us back into our traditional gender roles with shaming and cheap pop psychology. Can you expand on that?
/r/MensRights17/09/11 08:48 AM
2

Link? (I'm genuinely interested in how the majority of feminists think about trans people.)
/r/MensRights15/09/11 07:49 PM
1

I'm happy for you :)
/r/MensRights15/09/11 07:47 PM
1

I'm a little sceptical. It's easy to say people are transphobes (the author of the blog in this post certainly is one) but is it really true?
/r/MensRights15/09/11 07:44 PM
8

It's extremely sexist, which is ironic and hypocritical because the basis of feminism is to remove sexism. Not only are these feminists looking down on trans people, they are attempting to marginalise them so the world can continue to focus on feminist issues (as if there is a real need to do so in most first world countries nowadays). I find this extremely disgusting. I don't think most feminists are like that, but those who are should be called out and shamed.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 07:43 PM
10

I completely agree with you, I probably just worded my original sentence weirdly. (English is not my first language). What I meant to say was if what you said is true then that means the law is interpreted by the judicial system as saying all women are better than men, which is sexist against men.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 01:09 PM
14

Because a woman is inherently better than a man ain't it? That's what the judicial system is implying if what you said comes true.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 12:58 PM
3

This is an old case but holy shit!
/r/MensRights12/09/11 06:19 PM
4

Redditor for 4 days -580 comment karma. Reported.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 12:10 PM
8

He said: "On the night, like everyone else, I thought he was a decent guy. I thought this is all great. Then, 24 hours later... not so great. So it's decent behaviour to assault a man.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 01:39 AM
1

I pick egalitarianism!
/r/MensRights08/09/11 07:52 AM
2

If you believe you have a point, it's better to back it up with examples, preferably personal ones that you have experienced. You just sound so cynical here.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 11:51 AM
-1

It's not really realistic though. It's already taxing enough for the companies to have to pay for maternity leave. Women should not be paid maternity leave in the first place. It is extremely unfair for men to have to work while women can happily decide to have kids while getting paid fully for not doing any work.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 10:26 AM
5

For every woman who takes paid maternity leave, another man working the same job should receive the same amount of paid leave too. How's that for fairness?
/r/MensRights05/09/11 03:29 PM
48

Feminism likes to focus everything on women. Even false rape accusations--they claim the real victims are actual rape victims who feel pressured not to accuse. Now, are those also victims? Yes, false accusations make life hell for everyone. But no, the real victims are the real victims, the men who were falsely accused. And that often gets lost when people bother to pay attention to false claims. It's that kind of attitude that makes me promote egalitarian. (And yes, I know, not all feminists ar…
/r/MensRights05/09/11 02:59 PM
1

So do you think there should be continual segregation between men and women sports? Should they be merged so women can compete on the same stage as men?
/r/MensRights04/09/11 08:06 AM
1

I think deltaNEIN is working with VitaDog or they are the same person. Both are probably from r/againstmenrights.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 12:38 PM
10

Deep down they all believe that's how r/menrights think. I almost pity them.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 10:22 AM
9

children are not men's responsibility I know you are being sarcastic, but I find you despicable for implying all men think this way. Just because you saw one post on reddit saying that doesn't mean every single men on earth think this way. That is also why you should do away with r/againstmenrights, it's pointless attacking individual posts in this subreddit (which is catered to men for you info) treating it as the way all men think.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 01:33 PM
2

Pseudo rich people who want to keep their old lifestyle despite the change in their financial situation. Or just people like Cryer's wife who gets the government to forcefully extract money from her ex husband.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 11:43 AM
6

Just downvote trolls like those and move on. Letting them sprout nonsense here and showing them how they are wrong is more satisfying than merely banning them. What I don't understand is this. According to this x-post, the wife has 4% custody and is getting 2% CS payments as a result. Why is she not paying CS for the 96% custody that Cryer has? She might not have an income but that is hardly grounds for not paying CS. Also, how is the court "protecting the child's best interests" by forcing Crye…
/r/MensRights02/09/11 01:38 AM
4

The club's female supporter group, The Eagles Angels, yesterday rallied behind the former grand final forward with spokeswoman Wendy Harmer saying she had heard a lot worse said about women in rugby league circles. "Zorba is a very nice man and he says lots of complimentary things to women," she said. "He also notices if you have had your hair done or if you have a nice outfit. Anyone who's offended by that is really out of touch." I'm glad that there are still sensible women like this.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 04:38 PM
8

Instead of quoting random posts on r/menrights, the r/againstmenrights people should just respond to bullshit said by feminists like these. If they actually support these pathetic statements then they really are retarded.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 04:25 PM
2

Thankfully, the top few posts all denounce this idea, downvote brigades serve no purpose. Thanks for the link anyway, didn't know that it could be done.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 04:46 AM
4

You haven't explained how people can downvote in spite of the fact that there is no downvote button It's ironic that you say we spend more time in your subreddit when the whole point of r/againstmenrights is because of your unhappiness of r/menrights. All your posts are just snippets of posts by individuals who happen to post in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 03:59 AM
-1

How is it that their own mods get downvotes in a subreddit where downvotes are banned? It's at -3 for both Aerik's posts.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 02:29 AM
3

but ladies, please, don't tell me you want to be treated like men. They go into a pissy fit when they get treated like men, but they complain when they get treated like women.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 01:05 AM
3

That puts this into perspective. The r/againstmenrights females hate men because they feel like a man but they find that they don't get the same treatment as men. They have nowhere else to direct their hate towards, so they focus their time on sniping at r/menrights.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 12:59 AM
8

So they are lesbians who want equal rights with top 1% of men (while in the process of shitting on everyone else)? Braces for cross hair aimed at my balls
/r/MensRights31/08/11 03:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter