TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

alphadawg94 Archive

View 5 posts and 130 comments by alphadawg94 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

I think high n count is more a precursor to problems than the problem itself. If a chick is cool and loyal despite being a hoe what’s the difference. It’s more the symptoms of high n count that need to be adressed
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/22 07:50 AM
2

Googled and said Christian mingle has 58% women 🧐
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 05:41 AM
2

Interesting take, women are the product and men are the buyers. That’s how they make money. I wonder what an app catering to women would look like
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 05:38 AM
5

All women are the hottest shit ever and are “only” attracted to the top men, despite 45% of Americans being married.. coincidentally the swipe percentage for men
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 05:20 AM
5

Well they’re clearly not with a 45% right swipe rate. Makes the 5% rate for women look even more abysmal when you consider that the majority of those swipes are fat chicks 🤦‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 05:15 AM
11

It’s like saying, yea there’s plenty of food go check the trash can, there’s a 5% chance something will be in there
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 05:10 AM
14

45% is about correct if men swiped on women as good looking as them or better while disqualifying a few outliers. In contrast I think women swipe right I think ~5% of the time. DQing the morbidly obese does not make it equal. Single moms still get swiped on and banged if they’re hot just maybe not preferable
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 05:07 AM
2

Oh I didn’t realize you were a woman. This makes more sense now. We are talking about different things, you’re trying to tell me how I ought to date, I’m talking about what I look for in a serious GF. Are you saying you have an issue with my green flags? I approach dates very open to the experience and my decision on whether or not I want an LTR is very much based on how things go in the early stages of dating. I don’t see any reason to change that approach. I’ve never “looked” for a gf I just d…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 04:21 AM
3

I’d establish it mutually but as a woman she should raise the topic and I’d expect to observe her apparent monogamy prior to her asking. I’d assume we’d be naturally trending toward monogamy rather than eagerly sleeping around and then putting a hard stop on it. 5y current
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 04:07 AM
2

We’re talking about two different things. I approach dates open to everything and have had tinder dates go many different ways. I’m talking about what I see as green flags for a girl friend. Offers to pay, enthusiastic for sex with me, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 03:58 AM
3

Someone I’m exclusive with, dated for a few months, with the idea of progressing through the stages of a relationship towards marriage. Some would call it a serious girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 03:55 AM
2

I’m saying I want her to offer, and if she doesn’t it’s a problem. I’m aware some women think that way but not my concern because I don’t do that. I’m not sure what we’re getting at here
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 03:49 AM
2

I don’t see where you’re coming from, I’m just describing my vetting process and what I look for
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 03:35 AM
3

I don’t expect anything or drop hints. I’ll take the lay from a date and I’ll vet her if she’s LTR material based on everything else. My mentality is once we’re fucking the ball is basically in my court and I can just decide if she’s a good fit to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 03:27 AM
15

True women have first world problems compared to men who are by default starving to death unless they get their shit together.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 03:19 AM
4

Good I have a gf from OLD and I had great experiences from OLD prior
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 03:16 AM
2

There’s absolutely a difference between girls who throw pussy around and girls who I can take seriously. Some girls will hit you up ready to come over and fuck before even going out, flakey, always going out etc. I have no delusions that she’s currently for the streets. Other girls you take out once or twice, you hit it off you have sex and build from there. Girls also have different body counts by huge margins. I take no stock in whether a girl says she wants short or long term, long term is ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 03:15 AM
4

We’re talking about LTR prospects here, I’m talking about a good sign for a woman I’d take seriously. If she asks for the checks it’s a problem. If the bill comes and she says let me get half out of courtesy it’s a good thing. I’ll tel her no.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 03:07 AM
4

I generally agree, but I would add to the analogy that the cars the women are interested are in high demand and only sold to the most qualified buyers. She can’t test drive all she wants, but she’s gotta pass the credit check and have good insurance if she want to own.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 03:04 AM
5

That just isn’t my experience. Has she before? Yea I would bet on it. Is she being ridden like the town bike currently? Not necessarily. She’s doesn’t have to be celibate either when we meet, when I was active on OLD I had a couple girls every week so I understand if she’s got something going on. That said, I think you can get a clear picture of where she stands based on her eagerness to see you and your schedule with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 03:01 AM
3

Meeting people through friends is cool too, IMO it’s just vastly limited when you can literally match with thousands of people online with no added ties to worry about.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:55 AM
3

I pay, I just appreciate the gesture. Speaks to the woman’s desire to contribute and be a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:51 AM
4

Am I though? There’s tons of chicks on the apps who are getting out of LTRs, just started using the app, etc. who are not career whores and are quality prospects. Not looking for a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:48 AM
3

No I’ve never seriously dated a virgin and I’m not even that interested in that. I think I’m an attractive guy who can act right around women. Ideally I’m one of a few guys she’s slept with, if she’s been around that’s not necessarily the end of the world. I’m more interested in her dating life right now and moving forward than her past.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:42 AM
1

The last paragraph gives more context. A lot of this doesn’t apply as heavily to some looks-matched dude you meet at the grocery store who doesn’t get out there as much
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:37 AM
3

Not really, just offer half the bill and have sex if it feels right. If chemistry isn’t there, then moving on no big deal. The assumption and reason for online dating spin as that in OLD women are dealing with statistically speaking the most in demand guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:36 AM
6

Depends how convincing you are IMO, if you have a real substantive conversation about it and you’re being honest, I think a decently intelligent guy should be able to tell. If you’re lying and just say “haha I’m a virgin, moving on” then yea he’s not stupid enough to believe you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:33 AM
5

I want a woman who’s comfortable sleeping with me based on attraction and chemistry on the first or second date. I’d like to think that she’s selective about who she meets and fucks but acts quickly with me. Not a woman who hits me up explicitly for sex, although I wouldn’t rule that one out completely, I’d just have to be pretty compelled.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:29 AM
4

No I like to pick the girl up. The point is doing her part which IMO is a prerequisite for a good relationship. Also no I appreciate women who are comfortable with their sexuality. Ideally I’d like to have the impression that they want to have sex with me specifically because of attraction and chemistry not that they’re just throwing pussy around. I think both can be achieved on the first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:25 AM
5

Kind of. I think a lot of women intentionally withhold. Others may not be interested which is their prerogative, but my point is if the guys in demand he’s getting it somewhere and a relationship thats already at that stage is likely going to take priority.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:21 AM
4

Not exactly, I’m interested in a partner who wants to have sex with me not one who’s “giving” sex. Also I always pay the bill, it’s just immature not to offer IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:18 AM
5

If I had to take a stab at it, I’d say make him feel special. And qualify him a lot prior to doing it. Say you don’t sleep around without saying it. “I’ve been on a few “dates” off the app but no one’s really gotten anywhere.” Or just casually mention you haven’t seen anyone in a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 02:16 AM
0

I’m not seeing why you think it’s circular. It just checks out. There’s an assumption in there that the rate of divorce initiation is influenced by women desiring men of higher status, sure. My argument is just that the divorce initiation rate coupled with women being status seekers points to hypergamy. I don’t see a stronger argument to be made against it. If we assume that people don’t initiate divorces to “trade down” and women initiate more divorces, than we’d have to also assume they’re mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 08:30 PM
-1

I’d agree that both men and women trade up for the right circumstances, but “hypergamy” is a separate reason for a woman to trade up based on her biological imperatives. Stats are in favor of women somehow finding more reasons to trade up, so it’s not crazy to say women’s hypergamous nature plays a role.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:31 PM
4

It’s 100% true, it’s just that in the woman’s eyes, shared experience contributes to the value of the man. Also there are psychological factors other than hypergamy at play, that doesn’t mean hypergamy doesn’t exist. Idk why women try to argue against hypergamy being real rather than just owning it. Given the right circumstances of course they will trade up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 05:31 PM
3

The lack of mathematical acuity in this thread is astounding. The only possible reason is incorrect reporting or small sample size
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 12:57 AM
0

….. but the guy you’re having sex with is also having sex with the same person 10 times. And the girls I’m having sex with are having sex with a unique person when they have sex with me. Each time a straight man has a unique partner a straight woman has a unique partner. Every time a man has sex outside a relationship, a woman has sex outside a relationship. Take a small group of ten men and ten women for simplicity. If they’re all only fucking each other it’s literally impossible to create a sc…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 12:34 AM
0

If we’re talking straight sex, every time a man has sex a woman has sex. The averages have to be exactly the same. The only way this could not be the case is if we include gay sex or people are lying, or they have too small a sample size.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 05:18 PM
3

Lmao I was interested in reading a unique perspective and then you told us all to fuck guys. Great job
/r/TheRedPill10/08/22 02:14 AM
4

Woah
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 04:08 PM
2

For men, not have a penis. Try fucking with no penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 07:45 AM
1

Get good at literally anything. How’re you gonna make 50k and be fat?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 10:49 PM
2

I don’t think it would be incredibly popular, but if even 1/10 fathers would opt for it, it’s enough to alter the dating market
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/22 08:03 AM
0

I generally agree with your first two paragraphs. My idea is not based on the idea that you should dull your emotions intentionally, but rather that by building foundations that lead to true confidence you naturally build an immunity to the negative feelings of rejection. I wrote a more in depth elaboration on my point in my response to FFTzzz. Curious what your thoughts are there and if you think it gives better context in relation to your third paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 11:59 PM
0

I hear your point about not approaching someone you hold no appreciation for. But have there not been times when a person appears to you positively at first, but then displays things that change your opinion on them over time? Hyperbolic, but say you tap a woman on the shoulder and when she turns to face you, she’s missing half her face and shows clear signs of mental illness, simultaneously she tells you to fuck off. You’d probably feel a little shook, but not rejected. If you agree, following …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 11:28 PM
1

Respectfully, I’d push back on that. While there are some general traits all women like, I think we could agree that women do have different types right? Girls like different builds, races, hairstyles etc. In that sense women do search for compatibility. Women also have preferences in terms of political and ideological leanings, personality fitment, etc. if you’re pursuing a life and goals you can be proud of, based in reality not blind confidence, there’s certainly a subset of women who will fi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 10:57 PM
0

Interesting study. But the study does acknowledge a spectrum of pain from social rejection, mentioning that dislike of a stranger doesn’t elicit the same response as rejection by a romantic partner. To me this shows that our familiarity and personal opinion of the rejector influences or feelings. Following that logic, couldn’t we imagine a person who’s rejection would actually make you happy? Anyone you hold in such low esteem? If so, I’d ask this, why would you hold someone rejecting you in a r…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 10:37 PM
1

Every individuals judgement is subjective. I would argue that objectively your value is determined by the judgement of those you actually choose to engage with. As long as there are more people for you to engage with who will find you valuable, an individuals opinion is of no consequence unless you’re forced to interact with them. I know you only read one sentence, but in the last paragraph I mention I’m not talking about self delusion, meaning I believe your own personal judgement should have s…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 10:20 PM
1

The idea is not that everyone is compatible, but rather that a lack of compatibility should not be a painful experience if you’re proud of what you bring to the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 09:43 PM
2

From a strategic standpoint, sex is an investment for women. They will backwards rationalize that they like you after good sex, even if they’re wasn’t much there. Sex also releases chemicals that make you both feel good and more bonded. So you should have sex early and often. That being said if you’re not interested then you’re not interested, no reason to put yourself through something you don’t want. However it might be harder to find someone on your page. I would shoot for the middle, and be …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 09:09 AM
1

I assume you mean can*? If by “get” you mean “provide a blowjob to” than sure. That’s not how women measure dating success though
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 03:04 AM
3

I’m not making any point other than that it’s an undesirable trait they’ll be judged for. The girl above me said it wasn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 11:46 PM
6

Can she settle? Sure. Whoever she wants? No, and guys will absolutely judge her past. Also so long was she partying? Either way she’s older now.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 09:49 PM
2

Somewhat agree, an AF could also be better in every way but refuse to commit. Also an “only fuckable” could be hot as hell but have some other problem that makes her impossible to marry. I see your point though, a lot of times BBs are highly successful guys who essentially get the male equivalent treatment of a fat vapid whore.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 09:14 PM
3

As a pragmatic strategy on a micro scale sure. This is more a post about a facet of the dating economy. If this post was about economic factors influencing the price of food, you’re basically saying “just go to the store, buy food and eat it”
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 09:10 PM
14

Solid example I’d say
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 09:01 PM
2

But by who and on what terms? Hoes aren’t blacklisted but it’s a mark against for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 09:00 PM
3

You say that like it’s untrue. You’re saying a man should be happy with a lite version of his woman’s sexuality in exchange for “king” treatment. Which is what? Making an alright dinner?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 08:58 PM
3

I agree with you, I’m using “alpha women” as the opposite side of the Alpha fucks beta bucks equation. I define alpha women in the post as desirable women
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 07:38 PM
1

Yes. Men are dick salesmen. Women have the luxury of critiquing their approach. Sales people, by nature are going to put a few people off. Even if buyers are approaching the salesperson hoping to close a deal, inevitably there will be people unsatisfied with the process and put off. You can’t make everyone happy. Also for a man to create attraction, he has to differentiate himself. A man who is differentiated will naturally have people who like and dislike that differentiation. Those who dislike…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 06:29 PM
1

Women get mad that men want to date in a way that opposes their biological imperative. Meaning, guys who want to sleep around/not commit to them. If the guy is attractive, they call him a “player” “asshole” etc. If he’s unattractive he’s a “creep” “loser” “incel.” Women rarely have an issue with a guy who wants to follow female biological imperative by providing resources, committing, and “playing by the rules.” Unattractive guys like this are praised as good men, even if women find them repulsi…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 06:12 PM
1

Every time a woman sees a man looking at her, she is also looking at him. Harassment vs flirting can be subjective though, and given that women are biological selectors, their interpretation will lean towards harassment more so than men’s on average
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 09:03 PM
1

No one said I don’t see a difference. Just because there is a difference doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be a legal option. And it doesn’t mean it wouldn’t have an effect on dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:03 PM
1

Why do you need a marriage contract to do that? I get tradition and social norms, but in a practical sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 10:37 AM
1

Why would you think women bring so little to the table that they can’t compete? Not costing a man money and having frequent sex within the relationship would automatically make a woman more competitive than a hooker... unless of course she becomes so insufferable that he’d prefer to pay than keep her around.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 10:18 AM
3

Yes. I make 6x+ what my GF makes. She’s gonna see some of that money somehow unless I’m living on 1/6 of my income. Also 50 bucks a week is 2600 a year. The average married man transfers significantly more wealth than this to his wife each year.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 10:09 AM
1

No way, this fly’s in the face of the 80/20 rule. Also here’s the math. Women swipe right 14% of the time on average. So let’s say we have 100 women and they’re swiping on 100 men. The total number of right swipes by women will be 1400. If we distribute those among the 100 men, each man will have an average of 14 likes. So the average match rate for a man would be 1.4/10. Obviously some men will receive a higher percentage of those 1400 likes sent out by the women, but the average will stay the …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 08:26 AM
1

The idea isn’t for it to be a threat to women but an option for men. It’s not that women will be “scared” men will buy a prostitute but rather that a man wouldn’t have to accept a deal he views as inferior to the market price for sex. Women who are offering an inferior deal would have to improve or be priced out.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:52 AM
1

Yup, cheaper than dinner.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:12 AM
-1

1) Agree, this is just supply and demand and that will dictate the price. I would argue legalization-> normalization-> more supply-> price reduction. If unattractive or low income men remain priced out, so be it, but it’s undeniable that someone would be providing and someone would be using. Regardless of the price, there will be a price, and men would be able to weigh the price against what they’re currently getting. 2) Some people will afford more and some will afford less. Personally 200 buck…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 05:29 AM
2

I mean maybe not cheaper than just entrees at chili’s, really depends on where you go and what you order. And that’s without considering the time commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 04:47 AM
1

It would absolutely change things. Women won’t be able to offer a deal to men which is inferior to the market price for sex and companionship. People will say, “it’s legal in some places already and it’s no different.” This is correct but misguided. The problem isn’t just legality but also accessibility, acceptability, and an improved experience. Online dating was considered obscure before swipe based apps, now it’s commonplace, I think the same thing would happen with a “hookr” app. Once it’s l…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 04:30 AM
1

Yea, play to your strengths. Be better to talk too, contribute more money, be better in bed, bring all the things that you’ve developed over the years to the relationship. Also don’t let the negatives of aging effect you as greatly. Stay in great shape, don’t become disagreeable, stay adventurous. Men don’t trade for younger girls for arbitrary numbers, they trade for younger girls because older women tend to let themselves become less desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 05:42 PM
1

Simple, just keep earning more of his time. Be agreeable, be easy to spend time with and give the dude what he wants. She can make him prefer to spend time with her rather than someone “on his level.” Do this long enough and eventually he will be spending all his time with her and want to keep her in his life. Many guys may value physical attractiveness above all. But plenty of guys will overlook a couple points of attractiveness to have the type of relationship he wants. For example a more aver…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 11:26 PM
2

This is gonna be based on city and gender ratio. Bay Area? Women are punching up. When I went to Boulder it was all men punching up, by more than 2 points for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 06:43 PM
1

5’4? That’s a bottom 5% man. Even so personal care goes a long way. Let’s say the guys 5’7. Still short put ide say can still be a solid 8 if they’re jacked and well groomed.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 01:54 AM
1

Disagree about your opinion on men. Show me a 4/10 who’s JACKED and well groomed
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 03:34 PM
5

Women have the illusion that “making a guy wait” will make him more likely to commit. The silliness of this is that they would not make the most desirable guys wait, the only ones they make wait are the ones they think will actually wait around(less options/lower value). To protect their ego women will say that the ones they want the most and want a relationship with have to wait, but the reality is many of the men they would not make wait are the most attractive to them, they just don’t think t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 08:01 PM
0

What if you can’t come to an agreement? Who decides?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 07:51 PM
15

Read the whole thing and then got to the end and it’s England, Phew. Sucks for you guys.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/21 02:44 AM
0

Yea I’m good with it. I’ll watch gangbang porn with my GF, who gives a fuck. I’m not so puritanical to believe she couldn’t be attracted to other men or have fantasies. Now talking to other men or allowing them to flirt with her? That’s a hard no. She has to show me respect, not pretend she doesn’t have hormones.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/21 05:06 PM
1

Date a lot of people. You’ll find there are a lot of things you want/don’t want that you aren’t even aware of yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/21 11:24 PM
25

TRP’s objective is not to teach men to reproduce. Your biology does not know the difference between sex for reproduction and sex for fun. TRP uses principles of reproductive success to explain what will “work” with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/21 11:16 PM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 02:09 AM
1

Guys want to have sex without a condom and not use birth control, and they do not want to support a child they don’t want. There’s nothing wrong with that. Where’s the issue? Support should be required based on the involvement in the child’s life, not based on involvement in the child’s production. Parenthood is a privilege to be paid for, not an unfortunate expenditure. If you don’t want to pay, don’t and leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 01:41 AM
0

They derive their laws from the Quran, but do not adhere to the morality of the Quran. It’s not the same thing. Many Muslims disagree with how terrorists apply Quran’s message. Not all interpretations are equal. Is Taliban rule really what you’d want for yourself or loved ones? If not, why champion Osama?
/r/TheRedPill16/08/21 07:22 PM
0

Terrorists do not adhere to morality of the Quran. Lol please tell me this is a troll.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/21 06:57 PM
5

You mean the literal top dog in Al-Qaeda? Western equivalent would have much larger harem and not live like pigs in their own shit. Taliban and other terrorists are dirty child fuckers. Even if you over look their morality, which you shouldn’t, they’re still losers.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/21 06:26 PM
1

If you guys are talking about mean and don’t choose the same number for men and women then you both deserve to lose the bet. Mathematically it has to be the same for both men and women, every time a man gets laid a woman gets laid (Heterosexual obviously) Show me a data set of men and women who can only sleep with each other and have a different mean n count. I’ll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 08:02 PM
1

Although it sounds like the relationship may have played out slightly differently than you portrayed, I see your point. I think there is tendency to refer to the “best” man/woman and basically mean the most loving friend. When it comes to romantic relationships there are tons of other factors which can make someone best and we tend to discount the ones which would make someone attracted to an Amber Heard type. IMO TRP sees this as the truth and addresses the best practices to deal with it while …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/21 05:39 PM
2

There would still be a vibrant market. It would just improve the quality of the service. Regardless of how much male-to-female casual sex there is, people are always going to be willing to pay to get a little bit more than what they’re already getting, and someone will be willing to do it if people are going to pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 08:12 AM
1

I don’t mean enthusiastic during sex, I mean enthusiastic about having it in the first place. If a girl would rather make extra sure of my commitment than rip my pants off then I’d rather find the someone else who prefers the latter. Can’t date someone who needs the stars to align to bang.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 04:45 AM
1

Because you say things like “men are bad” and “men hate women”
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 12:32 AM
1

Oh you hate men. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 12:12 AM
1

I agree that their is nothing wrong with waiting. But I do have a problem with people putting out and then getting mad when they don’t get a second date. If a woman is staunchly against sex for the first three months for example, that’s good to know upfront so they can be weeded out in favor of someone who would be more enthusiastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 12:11 AM
1

Personally I like going on dates, but to each their own. It sure would be interesting seeing what legal prostitution would do to the price of a blowjob.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 12:06 AM
1

Aw you, making generalizations and wanting things to be unnecessarily difficult :(
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 12:04 AM
1

To be clear, I’m not against having one person to fuck consistently. My point is that having sex once doesn’t entitle one to more sex or a relationship and people have no right to be mad if they “gave it up” and it didn’t go anywhere. You’re not owed anything because you put out. But by all means I’m for people waiting so they can be weeded out by people looking for a partner who’s enthusiastic about sex
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/21 12:00 AM
2

The point isn’t that you’re not allowed to take your time, it’s that an arbitrary rule is pointless. Abstaining beyond your natural desire to abstain. But by all means take you’re time if you’re not ready, rather than putting out just to keep someone around. That way people can make an informed decision about dating you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 11:50 PM
1

All of you’re assumptions about me are vastly incorrect an baseless. You sound like a legitimate crazy person and are definitely the one between the two of us that will need help. Try lightening up a little bit and maybe you won’t need as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 05:46 PM
1

A lot of the women I’m interested in are college/early career aged and couldn’t reasonably afford my current lifestyle. So if I start dating one of those girls I’ll usually just end up paying. Theoretically sure I could only date girls who will go Dutch, but generally they’re going to be a bit older than me, if I can find them at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 03:40 PM
1

This is quality. Thank you
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 02:51 PM
11

Thanks for this response, now I can put a name on it. Would be nice if we had certain services legalized to make things more efficient.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 03:08 AM
0

Agreed, fuck stigma. Do what’s right for you. I respect a woman who doesn’t care about what other people think of her
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 02:57 AM
2

Right women do not coerce men into paying, so men should not feel shortchanged if they choose to buy a woman a meal and nothing comes of it. But men like to have sex with women who like to have sex. If a woman has sex that she doesn’t want to have because she’s afraid of losing the relationship that’s on her. She’s trading sex for the prospect of continuing the relationship, but the man is having sex because he wants to have sex. That’s on her. My point is, do the thing because you want to do it…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 02:53 AM
9

I’ve had girls have orgasms on one nighters, and heard plenty of stories of girls having orgasms the first time, from the girls. So I guess we have different experiences. No point arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 02:38 AM
12

Crazier to think no women are having them on a first date though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 02:26 AM
1

I like and mostly agree with your perspective man. I would say that guys can use things they would enjoy to get laid rather than only doing things to get laid. For example maybe you don’t want to buy a fancy dinner, but love drinking or going on hikes and you just bring the girl you’re into along for the ride. Unless they don’t have any crossover hobbies with most girls I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 02:24 AM
9

I strongly disagree with the premise. Plenty of personal experience where the first time was a lot more fun for the woman than it was for me. Also there are plenty of women who love one night stands. Do they skew towards favoring men? Perhaps, but women have the agency to make that decision on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 02:18 AM
1

Interesting, I would be interested to hear why
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 02:07 AM
8

“You take out the trash and I’ll do the dishes” is a reasonable compromise to make in perpetuity for example. But “I’ll buy you dinner for a blowjob” is probably not the best compromise to make often.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 01:50 AM
10

Right. Although it’s not my preference to wait, there’s nothing wrong with it per se. My point in regard to your response is just that if a woman chooses to have sex, it ought to be assumed that she’s accepted that risk for the sake of sex itself without an obligation to a certain kind of relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 01:47 AM
11

Personally I don’t think sex is one of those times for compromise and an upfront contract, should generally be gone with two enthusiastic parties. But that being said, prostitution ought to be legal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 01:33 AM
6

I would argue that if you don’t want to converse with the girl over dinner for the sake of it then you shouldn’t do it at all. If she gives the impression that she’s not interested or using you then don’t take her out again. As for the car trouble etc. I would say while I would appreciate some help if my car broke down, I wouldn’t necessarily think poorly of someone if they didn’t help. And if they did help It would be rude of them to expect some form of compensation if they didn’t mention it up…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 01:27 AM
1

I’d say all in terms of expecting reciprocation not agreed upon. I’m tempted to say all in general but I’m sure there’s an example of one we need.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 01:08 AM
1

It’s not that I have a problem with women who are uncomfortable having sex to quickly, just that I admire a woman who is more comfortable having sex quickly. IMO if someone gets “used for sex” did they really want to have sex at all? Or are they using sex as a means to an end? Kind of like how if you buy someone dinner and it doesn’t go anywhere after that, you didn’t get “used for dinner”, if you didn’t want to buy dinner independent of the outcome then you shouldn’t have done it in the first p…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/21 12:24 AM
1

Agree with you. The practical advice of FDS is not nearly as robust as the advice on TRP in my opinion. The main issue with FDS is this entitlement mindset that women’s sexuality has a positive value and men’s sexuality has zero value. Under the FDS model if a relationship goes poorly it’s the mans fault, a woman existing is enough. Under the TRP model it’s a GIVEN that unless a man does certain things the relationship will tank (fucking her right, leading, etc.) This places the burden of respon…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 11:33 PM
2

It’s a clear and obvious distinction based on the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 10:14 PM
3

Excellent point. Still agree with OP because I respect a woman who likes to have sex. But taking it slow with a virgin is way different than taking it slow with the village whore who just feels you should jump through a hoop for whatever reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 10:11 PM
2

OP said he respected women less after a drawn out courtship process. This would imply he didn’t rape them. Stop baiting a rape conversation, it’s counter productive to the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 10:03 PM
2

This thread, and my comment are about consensual sex. Not sure where you’re going with this. I’m saying if there’s not a reasonable chance you want to bang someone, then you shouldn’t date. That doesn’t mean if you don’t fuck you deserve to be raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 09:49 PM
1

Agreed, but so is someone who has an insufferable amount of arbitrary boundaries
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 09:35 PM
3

What’s wrong with you wanting his dick and him feeling good about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 09:33 PM
3

.... yes? Is that a serious question?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 09:28 PM
1

Fully agree, sex is just a fun activity for all to enjoy, and if you don’t want to have sex, why bother dating. Women who think sex is a bargaining chip are just pricing themselves out of the market for guys who have actual options. You’re right, it only leads to more negotiations down the line. I have huge respect for women who have sex when they want to and don’t let others tell them when it’s appropriate to do so. Can’t respect someone who lets other people tell her what she’s allowed to do w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 09:16 PM
1

Yea I read it. I think they have a right not to be bothered by losers tbh. People should be self aware of their own value. We both know they’ll give the time of day to the right person and not be bothered. If people only had positive interactions with strangers then the issue wouldn’t exist to begin with. That being said if they’re cunty to the average well intentioned joe then that’s on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 08:17 AM
1

It’s just a matter of who it is. I’ll gladly talk to a hot chick on the street and be annoyed by a homeless person. Women feel the same way, we know they wouldn’t mind having their day interrupted by a celebrity. I think it’s fair, if you have nothing to offer, leave people alone. If you’re getting dates, you’re not the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 08:09 AM
2

The answer SHOULD be obvious and it’s funny no one is saying it. Theoretically a woman who follows FDS tenants would not sleep around, have developed hobbies, career, take care of herself, and be “self sufficient”. Personally, I value all of those things in a woman. If a woman truly embodies all of those things she MIGHT be able to get a true HVM to wait three months for sex.(Personally I find the rule ridiculous, if you can’t discern intentions and “value” of your partner after a couple of date…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/21 06:57 AM
21

I think you’re correct when it come to a lot of the concepts and basically all of the jargon, but some concepts I believe are female appropriate. For example my LTR had some issues with feeling like she was enough for other people and overvaluing people who treat her poorly(male and female). We had a good conversation about how people treating her certain ways basically “hijack’s her psychology” into overvaluing them. I think it really helped her and we’re better off because of it. Sure you don’…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/21 05:22 AM
2

Solid post man, great food for thought. Do you think this idea strays from conventional Red Pill theory? My take has always been that this community really distinguishes the difference between hookup/plate/LTR quality women. I don’t think the AF/BB concept is to scorn women and say men aren’t like that, but rather provide a framework for how things work so we can take advantage.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/21 07:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter