TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

aquaticbub Archive

View 2 posts and 285 comments by aquaticbub on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Not to mention you can't eat nearly enough to grow on amphetamines
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 02:15 AM
2

Calvin and Hobbes right? Such good content for growing minds
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 02:14 AM
3

I mean... Technically women's selection is one of the primary drivers of evolutionary change in humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/17 09:07 AM
1

I would say "genuine love", the kind everyone so desperately seems to crave, is a very mutual respect and understanding. We are all using different definitions of love simply because we lack a spectrum for romance, and like to group them all under "love". However to me, if I have to choose one definition, is not going to include any sort of disrespect. Mother's do respect their children, to their level of understanding. And I do respect my dog, to it's level of understanding. But if I were in a …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 02:19 AM
1

Or multiple uses of the word and each one being a different form of love.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 09:09 AM
4

Love is, in part, composed of respect
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 08:10 AM
8

Cognitive dissonance at it's finest.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 01:52 AM
1

Since when is "the Law" the ultimate decider of human morality and decision making lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/17 11:09 PM
2

That saddens me. I credit much of my growing perspective in early adulthood to trying acid/mescaline/shrooms. They have such great potential, especially for those dealing with mental roadblocks
/r/TheRedPill07/09/17 05:05 PM
1

They're not meant to be done heavily... Dropping a tab or two of cid or taking an eighth of shrooms once very few months can really refresh a stagnant mind
/r/TheRedPill07/09/17 05:03 PM
3

Agreed on any drug. Most people should wait until at least 18 if not 21 to experiment with anything psychoactive
/r/TheRedPill07/09/17 05:02 PM
1

To deny psychadelics and their potential is kind of close minded
/r/TheRedPill07/09/17 08:08 AM
2

Thats... already how satire works?
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:16 PM
1

You're outrageously ignorant, or very naive. You will continue to go nowhere until you agree on the definitions. Basic common sense. How do you think we get there? Reformation, reformation, reformation. Red and blue will mix forever until an unidentifiable shade of purple emerges. Discussing definitions is the entire purpose of this subreddit. The entire purpose of philosophy. You think people should just up and quit when they disagree about certain definitions? No, we explain our position in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 12:14 AM
1

Personally I agree with the majority of the previous definitions. Regardless, I am not the one claiming they do not fit. You are saying truth is impossible to find. I am claiming that it is the search for truth that begets true information, not the truth itself. How can we come to a "general consesus" without the "general"? If we want to see how useless your conversation is to this topic, imagine the following: OP: x is black, y is white You: not everyone has the same definitions of black and wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 09:55 PM
1

And yet you refuse to even attempt to come to a general consensus? "Truth does not exist" is a cop out. Your inability to even commit to your own definitions is very telling of your stance
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 05:27 PM
1

I lurk here all the time. I see the discrepancies. And yet everyone who is unwilling to add anything but a comment about their opposition being wrong is not helping us further our own understanding. You see, no one is looking to win... or at least, not anyone seeking truth. We want to learn. And to say that you don't care to explain why you consider his definitions wrong is adding nothing of substance. I see a few people at least attempting to discern a difference
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 05:14 AM
3

Can you not discuss in good fashion? Common discourse involves sharing your definition and why, in opposition to a definition you may not agree with. Instead of merely dismissing his term and saying it is not yours, maybe give us an idea of what you think the definitions should be. If you can't add anything to the discussion what's the point of replying?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 05:05 AM
1

You're kind of projecting that he was even using that tone with you to begin with. Is everything that you deem pretentious and nonphilosophical automatically such?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 12:48 AM
1

To an extent they are gold diggers still. I'm not villainizing gold digging at all, it's a viable strategy and serves certain couples well. But I am saying that this action, whether or not you consider it gold digging, is responsible in part for the wage gap. It is because of these domestic oriented women choosing to renounce income that it exists, not to anyone's particular detriment. But to claim the gap is real and needs to be amended, while saying that "feminine women" relying on a man's pay…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:57 PM
1

No, I never said any of that. I don't understand the need to put words in my mouth. Never did I have it out for "feminine women". I believe all women who want to live on a man's pay check for their entire lives, especially without children, are gold diggers. Those with children are understandable, to an extent. Once the children no longer need upkeep, the mother should start working to provide a dual income
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:42 PM
1

If you don't have the money and can't get contraceptives, but don't want a baby, it's time to try anal ;) or become a nun. Regarding the 100k as "getting by", it's just an example of the premise in action. Sure, we can say they're not actually gold diggers until they hit a certain sum of money. But the action and premise are the same: a woman living on a man's paycheck. This is my definition of a gold digger..
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:27 PM
1

Contraceptives are not as expensive as a baby lmao. Good luck ever convincing me that you're saving money by not using birth control... and it's not about being rich. It's about easy money. For every 200k salary gold digger there is a woman as half as attractive digging for someone with 100k to save her. Gold diggers gonna dig.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:20 PM
3

Agreed 100%. It must be taken into account or the child and woman will both suffer.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:13 PM
1

Lol 250k? Try 100k. Gold digging doesn't need much gold to still be gold digging. It's all relative. A woman from poor origins will see an easy man making 150k as a huge meal ticket. So plenty of men are taken advantage of by gold diggers. Where did they get the child? If it was rape, understandable. Anything else could've been prevented through contraceptives or held off until marriage, when it's safer to actually have a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:12 PM
2

Good for you. But the concept was that "women get pregnant more often, therefore work less and make less." My rebuttal was "Then don't have a kid and spend more time working." You may be an outlier, but are in no way relevant to the topic of Women earning less due to pregnancy
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:03 PM
1

Do you have a statistic for the first claim? I find it hard to analyze the ratio of gold digging whores ;) as well for the second part. How is it that we are sure single mothers are a product of a divorce? Many women choose to remain pregnant without a dual income household to begin with. They are single mothers on welfare that never had the opportunity to divorce (or at least never attempted marriage)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 06:00 PM
1

So if you want a family find a partner? You're providing problems that are solved by either: Having a nuclear family (oh god no!) Not getting pregnant Why is having a breadwinner being a man such a big deal? If you choose to have a baby, you're choosing not to work. By choosing not to work, you better have a damn good backup plan (like, oh I don't know, a spouse?) Even lesbian couples would most likely only have one of them be pregnant while the other makes the money. Having a child sounds like …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 04:55 PM
1

What is the ratio of fuccbois to gold diggers? And do fuccbois get married, with near guarantee of a huge payout on divorce?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 04:50 PM
1

Exactly, and it's easier than STEM. So women choose gold digging, which does NOTHING to the "wage gap" mind you. If gold digging and spousal income was added to the wages, I guarantee there would be no gap. In fact, if divorce settlements were added, I'd like to see the displacement of income that is given to women "post-wages"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 04:48 PM
2

Pregnancy should still be regarded as a choice. If you are willing to bear a child and succumb payment from a regular job for 9+ months to do so, it is under no duress. The key here is to ensure women are educated enough to understand that making this choice impacts their careers and futures, and it shouldn't be taken lightly. It should be recommended that they don't have a child until one of the following: You can support it on savings alone You are a dual income household Maternity leave is pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 04:41 PM
3

I agree men's thirst generates the demand, but women bring the supply. It's easier to sell your pussy than to work in STEM. Don't go making it sound like men want gold digging wives. That's like saying drug addicts want expensive drugs. They want the product, but some of them (rich suckers) only know how to get it with money. As for being a manwhore, sign me up!!! The moment an attractive 40+ woman wants herself a young stud and is willing to pay, I will quit my day job.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 04:34 PM
4

So. The wage gap is to blame for the cause of gold diggers, because it is easier than working? Rather than to blame the gold diggers themselves for choosing the easier path (involving men no less)? The gold digging and lack of women in STEM is what's causing your supposed wage gap, not the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 04:27 PM
10

Why does the (so called) "wage gap" encourage gold digging for women, but not an increase in STEM
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/17 04:11 PM
1

And yet you haven't offered a single refutation. All you've said is that us was arguable, because you have chosen to argue about it. Does that sound logical? It can be applied nearly universally.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 09:54 PM
3

Honestly, I followed the red pill for awhile and I agree with his definition. I was low social and emotional intelligence, and definitely slightly narcissistic because of it. But it wasn't healthy. Post- TRP I can say I have a healthy self confidence, understand my flaws, how to better myself, and how to better take care of myself in regards to "mating". To say that being self aware of one's own social insecurities is "decimating" is a bit insulting. I had a particularly rough high school period…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 05:14 PM
2

When I think about it, it's almost like art. You can't describe it except through your own words because its definition is a direct representation of its effects on you and your interpretation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 05:07 PM
7

With this logic, gravity is arguable. Don't believe me? Well, you're wrong. I'm arguing about it right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/17 03:41 PM
1

People dislike being grouped. If men ever claim to know what a woman is like, they cry out. If women claim to know what men are like, it's the same. Many can no agree that the opposite sex may know more about them than they like
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 09:50 PM
1

The acceptance of differences allows us to define them. That seems to be the purpose of these threads and forums correct? The only debate seems to be conflicting definitions of man and woman based on preconceived notions we all hold so dear
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 09:31 PM
1

How is it that you understand these women aren't aware, and need help, yet there can't be a group of young men lost and unaware who need equal help?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 07:56 PM
1

Exactly. So to dispute it is meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 07:49 PM
8

Put excellently. Men are inferior at being women, women inferior at being men. Makes sense. Over glorification of the male role has led to "not being manly" = inferior
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 11:47 PM
1

There is no way to EVER prove she isn't lying, that's the problem... it's a heuristic. Easier to assume +2 N because of the saturation of women claiming -2 N or such
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/17 05:05 PM
1

Possibly more incentive to lower their N than raise it or be honest
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/17 04:45 PM
–

Then here I stand questioning.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 10:38 PM
–

To be worshiped without question? I am disheartened. What happened to skepticism. To questioning. The idea that there is no One Truth so that you must search to find many truths. Why is it so important to have a final say?
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 09:49 PM
3

You seem to be projecting subjective experience pretty heavily. You may have been more susceptible to sudden leaps in logic while others gradually learn the system fluidly. There's no way to tell of a "one size fits all" method of eureka.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 09:33 PM
–

You may be down voted for philosophy but I agree wholeheartedly. The Red Pill is a small niche, a grouping of methodologies and heuristics designed for maximizing sexual power (and more currently, RMV/SMV in general). This may work under the current framework but it is no way an indicator of the reality we are taking place in. It only works better than the system before it. What happens when we find the next "Red Pill", a step backwards from this one?
/r/TheRedPill24/02/17 09:30 PM
9

LOL. "You're not willing to be penetrated (by the same sex mind you), while these women are. Stop making excuses." Do you realize how ignorant this is to heterosexuals? How do you know that it doesn't make them extremely uncomfortable. A hetero woman fucks men. She can fuck some of them for money. A hetero man fucks women. He has to get fucked by a man, not have sex with the gender he is drawn to sexually? The original argument, of wanting to be able to have sex with older women as a young man f…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 05:51 AM
4

If it's being used as a platform for politics, you really want to give it full credibility? Loom where politics has led regarding public opinion and leaking stories in your benefit. He's just being healthily skeptical
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/17 07:43 PM
3

Over excitement at the chance of meeting women/getting sex. This also could just mean a very long dry spell.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 03:54 PM
2

Neo was a heretic. You see these posts as heretical, and their preacher a group of "misguided" posters on the internet. But when the prophet "returns back to life" it's hard to say he doesn't have a better understanding than you assume. Basically they're saying that these posts are a Torah of sorts. They're accounts of evidence to the contrary of "blue pill ideology".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/17 06:29 PM
1

Insightful, and agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/17 02:48 AM
1

Do you mean that in a positive, negative, or neutral sense? I definitely find the concepts to be internalized within me and that I can no longer blind myself from them, even if I wanted to. However I welcome truth with open arms.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/17 06:29 PM
1

See I have the history, however I have changed definitively. I don't view women the same anymore, I see them as equal beings with different hardware that behave similar, yet differently in specific circumstances. No opinion on flings vs. LTRs, only that they're different and fulfill different needs. TRP didn't make me hate women, it made me respect them as a whole, while understanding that I don't have to automatically respect each individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/17 11:51 PM
0

Try L-sits, hollow bodies, handstands, pullups, dips. Pushups are bullshit bodyweight exercises. A chest dip is 100x better and you can add extra weight more easily when you inevitably plateau after a week
/r/TheRedPill24/01/17 10:48 PM
5

Pushups on your back under a barbell
/r/TheRedPill24/01/17 10:24 PM
2

I agree this is fucking poppycocks. And I don't use that word lightly. This comes into TRP fetishes for dark triad shit. It's useful, yes, but honest intelligence will always outshine the facade. A good mix of intelligence and some manipulative traits leads to maximum results, but it's all primarily high intelligence leading to a superior male to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/17 01:06 AM
4

When did you state "the vast majority of traits are beta"? I initially agreed with your post, but under the premise of a more 50/50 alpha:beta. A major beta with a little alpha will be stomped out instantly. Only a good healthy mix can survive imo
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 06:25 PM
9

Nothing? Its merely a perception. Something to be aware of.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/17 06:17 PM
1

The idea is that, with a woman who desires you, its not assault. Its "desiring and being desired". I imagine they don't grope randoms butts, at least not without a reasonable amount of obvious signs
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/17 07:15 AM
1

Woah there were not talking about dark triads, just alphas in general
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 04:32 PM
5

This right here. "Real men can complete an sl1 play through - with no summons."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/16 12:21 AM
0

Superbly well-put.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/16 12:50 AM
0

They don't understand that this is one route many red pillers were forced to take: having a single mother. The vicious cycle repeats.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/16 12:49 AM
4

Dumping someone before they dump you/not dating someone who will obviously dump you/not care about being dumped?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/16 04:02 PM
1

And are these people met in real life or through the internet? As well as, is this just an external interpretation of them? I know a lot of red pillers these days have it out for MGTOW
/r/TheRedPill08/12/16 04:41 AM
8

The irony is that they're constructing their own Matrix. That they can "win". Hilariously enough that is a movie theory, that Neo merely entered a new Matrix designed to mimic him being a superhero chosen one. What they fail to realize is that they've never stepped off that treadmill.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/16 10:17 PM
1

TRP gets a lot of hate for doing a necessary evil. No one has the guts to tell these bloop kids that they're doing it wrong, or even notice themselves. I used to be die-hard TRP until I started going my own way, but I really can't see them in the negative light so many "ex-redpillers" say they do. In reality, the best color to be is purple (or really none). But you NEED red along with blue to get purple. I still see the mega-alpha reds as unsatisfied wholly, however hard they try and deny it. Bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 07:25 PM
2

Your story may as well be "become an outlier, date outliers"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 06:44 PM
2

Precisely my point. The answer is nothing. You lean your own way, the name can be used if it helps you identify your values but you are never your pill
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 02:11 AM
2

Just as I can run around claiming I'm from any place or carry any identifying characteristic, it doesn't make it so. Ever thought that someone could read TRP without considering themselves of a collectivist ideal? I guess that's purple pill, but I still read TRP frequently. Its like covering all grounds politically. You gotta see everything and understand what truly works and what is fat to be cut off.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/16 12:59 AM
1

People have been asking for the right ethical system since the dawn of time
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 07:51 PM
5

I will now run around proclaiming how alpha I am for being blue pill. Must make me a bloop
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/16 06:47 PM
1

I still have yet to see evidence myself that dread is abusive and objectifying. As for respect for women, it is no different than respect for men. Earned through trust, good deeds, and a pure relationship based on merit. The only people with problems respecting women most likely have equal problems respecting anyone at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 10:45 PM
1

And what makes it different from that used by TRPrs? I'm confused when it goes from non misogyny to misogyny
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 10:42 PM
1

Your addition makes it better, but I think you opened a new door. What is TRP dread game in the context of non-trp dread game? Simply by the fact that it's used by red pillers?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 09:03 PM
1

I don't think we're making any progress here. Im not of the mind that information can be inherently disrespectful. Actions in themselves taken with certain premises, sure. You're claiming TRP is inherently biased towards women merely because it is sexual strategy aimed at women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 09:02 PM
1

Your premise should just be boiled down to "male sexual strategy is misogyny"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 08:48 PM
1

You're still just stating it's misogyny without proof. Here you've listed dread game as on the side bar, objectionable, and misogynistic. Yet all my counter points to refute it as misogynistic, you've countered merely by claiming that it is. You've given no proof nor argument, just saying "well it is misogyny!"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 08:37 PM
1

Just because its in the sidebar doesn't mean it was invented by TRP, thats laughable. Lifting is in the sidebar. Trp never invented, merely advised. You're trying to narrow down the available topics of discussion until only misogynistic topics are left. Essentially trying to beg the question. How does its place on the sidebar make it misogynistic? You can't claim that by being used in TRP it is misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 08:13 PM
1

Is dread game dehumanizing? I'd like a explanation of that. And as for applying "trp concepts to non trp", I'm trying to explain dread game is not a fundamentally trp concept. It's always been present and merely been named by trp, in order to identify it. Do you truly believe TRP invented dread game? That humans have not been using negotiation tactics and social awareness in relationships since the dawn of civilization? You so badly want dread game to be instrumentally targeted at women. In real…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 07:45 PM
1

You haven't pointed out how its objectively targeted at women specifically. Essentially, you're saying that it's misogyny, but not why it's prejudice towards women. Let's assume TRP is for gay men. They advise to use dread game on male partners. Is it now misandry? I'm not attempting to argue if its abuse or not (personally I don't think its abuse because it never forces anyone into anything) Merely that it's not misogyny simply because you notice that men use it on women. Yes, abuse is abuse re…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 07:25 PM
1

There is no advice from trp for women because it is a male oriented sub. In fact, I'd go as far as to say dread game was adopted by trp from the modern woman's arsenal of relationship manipulation. A lot of trp is just things they've picked up from women, reverse engineered. I'm making the claim that "dread game" is a universal experience for both genders. Trp merely gives it a name so that men can be aware, as well as understand how and why it works. To you, this is misogyny. That's like saying…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 06:58 PM
1

So dread game applied by a man to a woman is misogyny? Then a woman to a man misandry?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 06:14 PM
1

While your response is valid in many ways, I fail to see any point of dread that is actually misogynistic. Seeing as it applies equally to both genders (and of the personal belief that it is NOT tailored to work on women, merely weaponized by TRP, therefore it's going to be used on women frequently), both sexes are just as easily influenced by the external factors dread places on them. In fact, women use dread all the time without knowing. People dread their friends without knowing. Perhaps not …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 05:38 PM
2

Dread game
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 08:15 AM
2

Okay? Go ahead and ignore my responses so you can keep being blind. I'm not even fully red, I just understand their concepts better than you clearly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 03:49 AM
2

Blue pill thinking (for a male, at least) is the culturally indoctrinated way of thinking in current modern society that leads the average man to think trucks = sedans (simplified but you understand I hope). The idea that both sexes are the same, and that all differences experienced by the sexes (whether it be from the opposite or the same sexes) are entirely socially constructed and serve no actual purpose to society. Through this, behavior is warped into aligning with this narrative, in an att…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 12:06 AM
3

That just seems like a fundamentally wrong interpretation of red pill ideas. Essentially, red pillers see men and women as different. Now, a lot of a TRP likes to use this is an excuse to say men are better, but that's only because they are men. Of course they're going to root for their own team. Same reason women talk shit about men together. The funny thing is that trp does not view women as inferior. They merely have a role they are best suited for. Feminism and blue pill ideals dislike that …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 11:13 PM
3

Have you ever considered that maybe, just maybe this list is actually what they USED to believe. And that they took the opposite and sewed it together to form TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 10:40 PM
3

In red pill idea, blue thinking is actually misogynistic as well. Treating women special doesn't allow them to actualize their full potential and is pretty negative in a very subconscious way. The idea that we're all equally special and good at the same things is much more toxic than acknowledging the differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 10:33 PM
1

Wrong, misogyny is the prejudice towards women, as misandry is the prejudice towards men. If all women/men ARE like that, it is both prejudicial and factual
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 06:27 PM
2

Woah, don't tag me in there. I disagree with them wholeheartedly. I think the fire and passion from chasing a dream to change yourself or humanity, not for the goal of having sex, is more powerful than any sex drive could be. It takes a strong man with the discipline of steel to truly change his nature through sheer willpower.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 06:15 AM
2

The reason people don't leave and instead use dread is because they'd prefer not to have wasted their time on this woman and want to at least attempt to continue the relationship. If youre beyond the help of dread game then yea, you do leave. As for dread game not involving communication, I'd say everyone has a different version of dread. Telling a woman that you're wanted by other attractive women (whether overtly or covertly) have the same effects, one is just more tactful than the other. Both…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/16 06:26 PM
1

I can agree to a point. I think an entire foot is a bit much, as average women are 5'6ish in my area. Most women I've met feel small around anyone 6' (that has good posture!!) so long as they aren't grossly under or overweight. That means about half a foot is a clear advantage. Height is important but it's really just a trait that will get your foot in the door, only 6'6+ monsters can rely solely on height. The key is being taller than the rest, not just freakishly tall. You're right about muscl…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/16 06:06 PM
1

You're saying soft dread is manipulation, however isn't it being completely honest? It's the passive way of saying "Look babe, I still have plenty of game left. If you don't want it, this other girl right here is gonna get some of it." The hard dread would be to basically say that overtly to her face. And its not manipulation, it's the truth. We really are willing to dump her if shes being difficult. Should we lie and say we won't next when she's being hard to handle? Soft dread is a good answer…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/16 05:13 PM
1

Honestly anything above 6ft is a big game changer. Women just love to hear that 6 out of your mouth when they ask your height, not to mention you have way better spotting capabilities when you're above 90% of people's heads.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/16 04:56 PM
2

In the OP comment this is stated as a rare but devastating occurrence.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/16 12:32 AM
2

I think its because a lot of red pillers (including TRP) view MGTOW as a cop-out. Instead of "Manning up" and going head on into the danger, they choose to "avoid it". It's actually quite shaming to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 07:29 PM
3

The gap between MGTOW and TRP is becoming increasingly smaller. TRP seems to just be MGTOW with the caveat that gaming women is a better method of achieving satisfaction than to ignore women altogether. In reality, one seeks to leave the marketplace, and the other seeks to internalize the methodology and run the marketplace. Both solutions to the same problem: a corrupt market
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 06:07 PM
2

Point to me where TRP condones excessive masturbation, drug use and mindless consumption. Also point to me where they say it's feminism's fault for their shortcomings? There is no blame, only awareness of the effects feminism has on the modern social structure. The main idea of TRP is that we fail only due to our own inadequacies and misconceptions. Succeeding is merely a byproduct of ones own self-awareness of the role they play for society. As for not giving up pron and gaming, TRP would gladl…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 01:43 AM
1

Don't you think the majority of TRP would agree on giving up those things? That those are exactly what make being a feminized man in the West so easy?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/16 01:19 AM
2

I believe in this context attraction refers to sexual and not mental. Otherwise "unattractive people date unattractive people" could mean the 10/10 borderline personality nutcase is unattractive (her personality) and is dating a wonderful 5/10 man whos just such a good person that she doesn't care he's overweight and cant run a mile (also unattractive)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/16 09:52 PM
2

Agreed. It's the false idea that they can get these men to commit that ruin their expectations when they end up as just another fleshlight
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/16 04:42 PM
3

If you're able to find a woman who will stick with you forever, then of course protect her to the death. However, seeing as that's majorly lacking, the idea of being a protector to an unfaithful recipient is less than appealing
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/16 04:35 PM
3

No, they should be happy about being desired at all. Merely indifferent and aware that it's often for providership.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/16 04:26 PM
1

As you..use amused mastery too? Where are you going with this
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/16 02:35 PM
27

Ding ding. It's not even shittiness they're buying into. They're seeing the sexual culture for what it is and deciding that to acknowledge is better than to ignore.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 02:50 AM
3

So the world must be divided into red and blue. (Everything that isn't red is blue.) Assuming you were to fall into either camp, there are definitely "red people" that do not know what red pill is. Yet they are red. Do they ascribe to /r/TRP ideology? Perhaps not. Does this make them blue? I'd argue that no, it doesn't. Same goes for blue. There ARE a group of blue pillers clinging to a specific ideal and are becoming increasingly collective. Thats why they have their own subreddit. And yet ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 09:24 PM
1

I think this is just attractive to anyones ego in general. Both men and women fall into this trap as it validates a lot of worth when you are "the one" for someone
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/16 08:23 PM
1

Golden child in what way?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 10:51 PM
2

Psychology is obviously much more complex than one or the other... it's a blend of events and patterns spawning from these events, within the physically unique medium of someone's brain. Gonna go completely deterministic here but I'm sure these brains also come with similar premade structures expressed genetically that influence personality and actions equally. These come together to make a person, and while they're always changing at least slightly, they're usually following some sort of patter…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 10:50 PM
1

It's almost like a virus. Mother's who were treated certain ways often raise their children in similar fashion, with males being subconsciously turned into betas. I find this much more common in divorced households with narcissistic mother figures who really take it upon themselves to correct their children's behavior in order to fit their own narrative. These betas find women similar to their mother and begin the cycle over again.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/16 07:57 PM
6

So you're giving absolutely 0 credit the to male in regards to who initiated?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/16 03:47 AM
19

More so in the sense that, if you allow yourself to be cucked but it isn't your kink, you're clearly doing something wrong in your relationship. The idea is that a man who is in control of his life either: A) will leave a woman who cheats on him Or B) is high value enough that the women he commits to won't cuckold him Neither of those situations ends in you being a cuck. The only way is if you allow yourself to be walked upon. AKA "wow that guy has no spine in the relationship, what a cuck" insi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/16 12:58 AM
1

I had a hard time making that story into any sense haha. And your advice doesn't really follow. Its not our business to let someone know who and what you saw? If I saw my friends gf in the supermarket, I'd be all "Hey I saw Sarah at Safeway the other day!" By changing that scenario to "Hey I saw Sarah at the club the other night!" It becomes too 'none of my business' to mention just because it may affect their relationship based on Sarah's actions?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/16 04:13 PM
1

See I feel it would just pass over me, I would be aware and understand the circumstances but I'm unsure how I would feel emotionally. I don't remember the last time I was sad for someone else unless I really try and feel it, but it certainly doesn't come naturally
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 07:05 AM
3

This is a sad portrayal of psychopathy. It is not wholly characterized by unnecessary violence. In fact most psychopaths are probably nonviolent until provoked so as to not stand out...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 07:03 AM
3

What is the difference between apathy and lack of empathy? To elaborate, as an example if my mother or father died I'm not sure I would be sad. I would be more worried about the repercussions of the event and it's effect on me. Their death would be meaningful, but I'm not entirely sure it would make me feel anything... Another example is when my mother and grandma both had cancer. I didn't feel any worry or sadness. My grandma is the sweetest being in existence and spoils me to no end. Yet I can…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 03:30 AM
3

The boredom thing struck home for me. Not to be "edgy" but I personally believe I have some psychopathic tendencies (narcissism, manipulation, lack of empathy for most if not all). The traits don't show up to anyone very significantly but you spend time with me and you'll notice when I slip up. However what you said about boredom makes the most sense to me. Everything is just so dull, it's hard not to get fucked up and look for something to jump off every day. People's lives bore me, my family l…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/16 09:50 PM
1

Um, what? The question "what do you think are good uses for women?" sounds pretty loaded every time I ask it. Same as "what do you think are good uses for black people?" Sure I can answer, and probably answer in some form of "correctness", yet to do so would be to bring myself down to a position where I'm fabricating uses for a specific subsect of the population based entirely on gender or race. Pretty sure that's blatant discrimination.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/16 02:54 PM
1

No, it's criticizing the problem with your question. "Deflecting" a loaded question is necessary because to answer it would be wrong to begin with. I'm merely trying to point out, with my own variation of your question "what are the uses for women", that the question is inherently flawed. Like "do your parents know you're gay?" can't be answered logically without ruining your position to begin with. Ask a valid question and I will respond with an equally valid answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 11:22 PM
4

Haha what a loaded piece of shit question. How about you lemme know what "the uses for men are?"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/16 07:49 PM
1

Mhm I really do. Big Macs can be delicious when I'm drunk as fuck and need a quick tasty treat. But when I wanna dress up and feel good I like to take some friends out to Ruth's and order a delicious, tender, juicy steak. That leaves a nice taste in my mouth that I won't regret in the morning.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/16 05:01 PM
2

Or, the time it takes to get Ruth's isn't worth the wait sometimes. If McDonald's is open at 2am and I want easy food, guess where I'm going? Doesn't mean I don't prefer Ruth's food, but it also doesn't mean I can't appreciate the tasty Big Mac that still equally satisfies my hunger in a cheaper and more convenient way.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 08:48 PM
3

No its just more convenient than spending effort on Ruth's. Just like a 6 vs 8, 6s are easier but it doesn't make them of "higher value" than the 8s
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 07:22 PM
2

No that's the discrepancy. It's a double standard. The woman puts in "low effort" because she doesn't have to have good SMV to get the higher SMV man. A guy trying to get a girl above him will always have to use massive effort to increase his SMV (if only temporarily) just to climb the ladder.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/16 07:20 PM
0

Yes plenty of attractive men above their own SMV, or at least their self-interpreted SMV
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 07:01 PM
10

The joke is that women like her still won't fuck those men. They're so low SMV and confidence that they cannot even fuck the DTF uglies.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/16 06:49 PM
14

It may be more indicative to hear from the tall and short men. Take into account that women probably wouldn't want to be seen as shallow enough to admit height as a deciding factor of attraction, while men of different stature have firsthand experience with their ability to get women. Same as asking "do women like men who lift", you get more straight answers and less tiptoeing from the ones experiencing the increase in women's attention (men), not the ones dishing it out (women).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 03:51 PM
1

You need to take into account the fact that "true alphas" in a vacuum would have multiple children with multiple women, and probably be protective of their entire "troop." Physical traits and attraction get you the multiple children/women, while resources and status help much more with keeping one's social circle intact and healthy. Its a combination, not to say one plays any larger role than the other. On top of that, this "true alpha" would have betas cleaning up the mess for him. Makes a lack…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 02:37 PM
1

And yet we have the ability to classify mental disorders that multiple people have? Is schizophrenia not a real thing because there's no way people can have the same mental things? Multiple people follow very specific patterns that are inherent in human nature. For the same reason I can say all humans get hungry if they don't eat. We are talking about fundamentals, not unique personality. In which the case is that, yes, many if not all people are bound to these patterns.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 04:11 PM
1

All men have testosterone. But according to you they're all different because "that's how life works"? What does that even mean
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 03:18 PM
6

That is exactly the question. By defining what "like" means in this situation, we can determine what you mean and what TRP means. If its not the same like, you're not talking about the same AWALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 02:50 PM
4

See, the problem arises when we acknowledge that "rational thought" is still entirely driven by perception. Regardless of if they can think through reasoning, when they base these thoughts on separate preconceptions, their "rational thought process" is entirely founded on biases they are unaware of. The same goes for men, it is merely a product of being a mind limited to ones own perception. The claim If you are like TRP and go for young and easily impressed insecure women that are too immature …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 07:36 PM
3

Who said to call them an idiot? All your method does is alleviate negative feelings that happen after the event. If that's your goal, then go ahead and react that way. But if you want to help prevent the event, then teaching mitigation of risk factors is infinitely more beneficial. Sure, go ahead and see if their feelings are hurt. When a program comes around trying to teach muggers not to mug, I'm sure people will be willing to walk down dark alley ways at night right?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/16 09:50 PM
3

And yet you'd be right to call them out if it was an obvious mistake. Only an idiot takes the dark alley at night and blames the mugger. Someone who had more caution could avoid it, so a conversation on safety and how to spot danger would probably help the victim from further situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/16 04:53 PM
2

If someone walks down a dark alley at night and gets mugged, why focus on letting them know that its a bad idea? The mugger is the bad guy here! Let's start a campaign to teach people not to mug.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/16 02:14 AM
12

And yet one could argue that it's not even the betas fault. A man whose reality conforms him to a beta lifestyle may not know there is anything but
/r/TheRedPill13/03/16 05:53 PM
1

But you can get food elsewhere... so you clearly don't need to get it yourself. That's your entire argument in a nutshell. You're saying that regardless of wants or needs, the fact that a man has gone without sex for his entire life means we are entitled when we think we need it. So to you, because plenty of people go without food, you are entitled to think you need to provide for yourself. Clearly someone else did it, so I'll compare it to you just as you've compared all men to the Knights Temp…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/16 05:33 PM
9

Buddhist monks give up on finding their own meals and rely purely on psalms. Clearly people dont need to find their own food if they try hard enough. Getting your own food is completely entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 05:13 PM
1

Self perception is a huge liability for correct data though. We need a factual basis for the "sexual energy" spectrum, and the most prevelant is to watch behavior and associate key patterns with feminine/masculine. Red pills typically associate AWALT with feminine behaviors
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 01:08 AM
2

I'd say men tend to be between the 70-90 range of masculinity with outliers in both. Same for women and femininity. Evironmental causes can sway ones disposition to act masculine or feminine. I don't think either sex is 100% masculine or feminine, but they have developed biological tendencies towards the more beneficial sexual energy. It's why masculinity compliments femininity
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 10:34 PM
2

No, I would say they have a unique case that allows them to be feminine while being attracted to women. There are definitely masculine women and feminine men. I would also argue that lack of physical competitiveness is a feminine trait, not a requirement of being a female however. Females tend to femininity and males to masculinity
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 10:27 PM
2

I would say less to do with experience and more to do with drive. We can bond over common male drive, like wanting to have sex with women, physical competitiveness, etc only because we share male nature. Only because AMALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 08:17 PM
4

Well you are a part of AMALT. You don't have a choice. The fact that we share so much of our brains just from being male means we fall into AMALT. The idea of it being a negative is hilarious. It's just a category. Just like AHALT would include things humans have in common, and for some sort of alien race, AHALT would be used to cautiously remind them that humans are emotional, social, etc. People don't like the idea of a deterministic universe in which their behavior can be predicted and unders…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 05:53 PM
6

The problem here is that if there really IS a biological difference between men and women, and if this plays a part in behavior, then it becomes immediately more useful. As for the "racist" science done by white supremacists, we've learned race plays very little part in behavior when accounting for cultural differences. However the difference between sexes seems to exist independently of culture in many ways, making it not entirely analogous to the racism described above.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 05:43 PM
3

Well AHALT exists, it's just different from AWALT. Just like I'm sure someone can create a useful version of AMALT (all men). But for men, the most useful term in discussing sexual strategy with WOMEN is AWALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 05:39 PM
10

haha like all those people coming out to attack the radical feminists right? Oh wait... You say he's ruining reputation, but that means you're aware that he isn't an actual representation of the true TRP. So then he isn't really ruining reputation. If you actually believed him to be a good sample of TRP then possibly there would be a problem. However the fact that people can so clearly separate the real TRP from idiots like this shows that people know TRP isn't this misogynistic, and this violen…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 09:15 PM
2

Just curious, how does being a MGTOW make you a weirdo misfit? And who said they are bred in TRP?
/r/TheRedPill06/12/15 08:02 AM
1

You addressed the redpill's main content as "Every metric they use to define themselves as "men" revolves around their relation to women." However, if you look at fitness, I could say "Every metric they use to define themselves as "fit" in /r/fitness is around their relation with fitness/health etc." You see the problem here? Any subreddit that has a specific premise will of course relate in terms that are in line with said premise. You don't go on fitness without relating everything to fitness,…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/15 11:24 PM
4

The countless elipses make this sound so drawn out, where are the periods man?
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 03:01 AM
47

What do you think doctors do with their stethoscope
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 01:35 PM
6

So if BP had more votes, that would be bias too? It can't be that more people agree with one side than the other, it has to be some unfair reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 10:33 PM
0

In TRP theory, you'd be wrong saying Its misogynistic to justify it saying that it's ok because women don't mind as long as they have your commitment. But they can't cheat because they're the gatekeepers of sex. You view it as wrong, but TRP just says that's the way it is. And then develop something around it. It's not misogynistic if you're there's no hate or prejudice. You're assuming that what they generalize is false, so that they're just making shit up to be misogynist. But to TRP, it is ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 05:32 PM
1

So now TRP is misanthropist as well, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 05:27 PM
2

Misogyny is ingrained hatred, or prejudice towards women. How can it be misogynist if the framework for TRP is set by women's nature? Is nature misogynist? It's not like TRP was just created. It is a systemized implementation of human flaws and errors, and what TRP uses when pertaining to women, you seem to find misogynist. That doesn't even make sense with the true meaning of the word. Like I said, then it's also misandrist and misanthropist, because TRP says basically everyone is worthless at …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 05:03 PM
3

What you do is more on the lines of describing what YOU think women men are like, generalizing the whole gender based solely on it Let's teach men not to rape, it's the patriarchy's fault, etc. For a moment let's imagine 1,000 guys all start coming across the same generalizations in their life about other men. They realize, holy shit, these generalizations work, and are applicable, reproducible, and effective. They include the 1,000 who discover these generalizations, as well as all the other me…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 04:44 PM
2

decent human being If your priority is to fulfill a sexual need, wouldn't it be completely logical to prioritize it instead of trying to fill someone else's notion of a "decent human being," whatever the fuck that means at any given moment
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 04:26 PM
2

Thus is a good point. I've been seeing more and more "Will to Power" speeches however and I tend to agree with them, from a pragmatic standpoint
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 07:00 PM
0

Yes but the concept is the same. the majority of TRP is like minded morality, as actions generally follow a specific moral guideline of the person causing them. Many actions fall neutral, but the things TRP sees on TBP and vise versa do not match up. TBP happens to be a wider group of people, and so it seems as the "normal" way to be. But really they are just differing perspectives, neither better or worse, so the arguing is really just persuading to see why "ours is better than yours"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 05:03 PM
1

I hope she gets this. If she doesn't then there's no point in explaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 04:41 PM
1

You're limiting your definition of the word "popular", probably due to the way you learned to use the word. If you don't see popularity, then you're most likely not being social. And I doubt that, you said you have a group of friends. I can guarantee you there's some sort of social dynamic in your group of friends, regardless of how close knit you are. They probably have friends that you don't, and vice versa? Then they have potential to be popular in the real sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 11:25 PM
1

You just made a very contradictory person. The only people I can think of who would be like that are people who were cool in high school and think by being loud people will like you and think you're funny or dominating he conversation.. But everybody hates that guy. So I don't know If everyone hates them, they're not popular. Their popularity isn't necessarily defined by them. I'd say it's more defined by the people who perceive him to be popular. In a sense, a person becomes popular when people…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 10:30 PM
1

Well good for you, but ignoring it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Being popular isn't a judgment, it's more of a quality. For example, if you see a blue car, it is not judging it to call it blue. It is perceiving it. To call someone popular is merely to perceive their popularity. Now, to act upon said popularity would be a judgement. To assume other qualities based upon the previous is an assumption. Just because you don't label things does not mean they are exempt from the qualities you are not…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 09:59 PM
1

In your world, what would you call it when one man has many good friends, is invited out frequently, and is generally liked by the people around him? Now, what would you call a man with little to no friends, nothing special about him, and isn't invited places often by basically anyone? Where I'm from, we call the first man popular, charismatic, and connected even. The second one we call unpopular, alone, disconnected. What do you call them in your world?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 09:45 PM
1

First of all, what's this "Adult World"? You mean to say the world actually changes when you magically become an adult? Popularity exists as a human trait. Everything you see in high school does not just disappear. Popularity exists, cliques still very much exist, everything stays the same, you just get older and gain more insight into what you used to view as popularity. It's still there, you just view it differently. They're facets of being a social creature. This "Adult World" is still full o…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 09:37 PM
1

I've read the front page. I don't think I generalized it wrong You just proved to me that you haven't got a clue. Again, loudest idiots. That's advice that you're following. You're the kind of person that equates lifting with being a dick. It sounds like you're very bitter for some reason towards TRP. What makes GLO an idiot? What makes these people so stupid? If it is only by the basis of your claim, I have little reason to give you any more merit over TRP. If anything, your demeanor comes off …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 04:23 AM
1

You really think that all TRP is like GLO don't you?... It's much more diverse than that. It's literally just tons of different men. And you so quick to generalize all of it shows me how little you actually read into all of it. You probably just graze posts and don't go through all the comments, see the differences in opinion on some matters. All of your "self based statistics" you've said are only comparing you to a beefed up caricature of how you see TRP. It's not just full of muscle heads, it…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 04:13 AM
1

And they're cutting their potential short by taking that path. This is literally just your opinion. Not to say you are wrong or right. You need logical reasoning though. Something more convincing, because obviously it isn't working by just telling people they're making the wrong choice, when to them, it so clearly seems right. They'll need evidence, just as they needed evidence to begin thinking Red Pill to begin with. You just need more conclusive evidence than that which they've already found …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 03:29 AM
1

There's no point in discussing GLO, he's just one guy doing his thing and it's working for him. As for this: Except it's not brought any clarity. It's a flawed methodology and sours your outlook on life. That's another matter of perception, no? If TRPers see the methodology working, and they're not souring because of it (although you claim it so definitely does), then it has brought clarity. Just because you can't see it does not mean it isn't there. To TRP, you haven't seen the clarity change, …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 02:16 AM
1

I personally dislike GLO. Too "in your face" for my taste. But alas, it's only a matter of perception, and a lot of TRPers seem to like him. That's why he stays. I think he gains a lot of his backing from people still in the anger phase, and with that being the majority of new users, he generates a lot of traffic. It'll crash like every other similar movement. And? Does this stop movements from starting, because they know they will perish? The only way to begin is through action, inaction would …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 01:37 AM
2

The fat men are the feminized ones. That's the whole point. Obesity has risen along with the emasculation of the western man. It's just one mark along many of self control and discipline.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 11:14 PM
1

But that is all of reality... To what extent can something be original? I can say nothing is truly unique in that it all comes back to one point. It's only when we use our reference of perception that we can see the usefulness of TRP. In the sense of the perception of the modern man, TRP attempts to unveil a portion of truth by using those equations posted earlier. The equations work, and the ones supported by TRP are done so because they have a different packaging to appeal to the type of men w…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 09:20 PM
1

Agreed. But then that is not a TRP equation, it's something you've created yourself that happens to get the same answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 09:14 PM
1

That's not equivalent to "Only lift." Again, refer to my equation analogy. w+x+y=z If, w= lifting and, z= [what you want] You must lift to get z, however w!=z Do not "Only lift," but do lift if you want to achieve z
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 09:09 PM
2

No, but I'll blame the dog if he continues to do it against the advice One method of getting the dog to stop is beating it. That's the TRP method. Or you could train the dog. Both produce the same results. One is a bit harsher than the other. First of all, your decision to take advice or not stems from your perspective, which is, again, built by those around us, not ourselves. The dogs ability to stop peeing must rely on your ability to adequately give the dog an environment in which peeing outs…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 09:01 PM
8

should have learned as children This is pathetic. You don't blame the untrained dog for peeing on the rug. You blame the owner who didn't potty train it. How can you expect anyone to "should have" learned something? Obese children "should have" learned that eating poorly without exercise makes them obese, and yet with all this societal conditioning and terrible parenting, they're still fat as fuck. The whole point is that society (our parents, peers, influences) isn't teaching men the way it use…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 07:27 PM
3

See, there's nothing wrong with women doing it either. Blues never realize: there is no "unfairness." Men understand that it works on men, and that it works on women. TRP helps employ it as a tactic for your advantage, and allows you to prevent it from happening to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 03:03 AM
2

The key is determining the motivation behind the sexual desire. This determines the true reason a person riders the carousel. Red pill often finds the motivation to be vastly different between men and women, as their perceptions of sex and relationships vary. It's why being a slut as a woman can mean something differently than being a slut as a man. They stem from different beginnings. If you've ever known a slutty woman and a slutty man, you can easily identify differences that are clearly ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 01:29 AM
1

But see, it's not that way. It's like this: I have personal preference not to date CC riders. Regardless of that reason (I'm sure you can think of a few), it's my preference. It seems lots of guys agree with that, so ultimately, to them (and myself) dating a CC rider is not something we would want to do. Now, for being a Pussy Carousel (?) rider, does that make the women not prefer to be with me? In my personal experience, no it doesn't. Seems a lot of guys agree with this too, so ultimately, be…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 01:14 AM
4

that's counter productive: CC riders will be much more likely to cheat/seek sex elsewhere, as they are proven to be cock riders in their nature. Liking sex does not mean you're a CC rider. Riding the CC means you're a CC rider.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 01:08 AM
4

Honestly, it was never really a straight conversion. It was more like, I began browsing, and found it interesting and useful. I gradually increased the amount I lurked, until I subscribed. By then, I had begun to internalize the new behaviors, and better understand the concepts at a hands on level in real life. Through this I believe I started on the steps that TRP considers extremely common when beginning to swallow the pill. Every day I get a little more red. I just see so many blue/red exampl…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 04:06 PM
1

Exactly. Only those who fear the truth getting out or don't understand it attempt to keep it silent. No one likes disrupting the status quo.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 05:29 AM
10

one could say it adds to later discussions by halting the amount of useless commenters
/r/TheRedPill05/07/15 10:23 PM
2

There's no way TRP is necessary, but the idea is that for the people who can't do it on their own, it is one of the only nukes that can help you change with very obvious, fast results (as opposed to only learning through trial and error) There are plenty of all-naturals, but in the western world, society pushes a much more feminized narrative for both men and women, and RP helps you wake up from that false programming (if you haven't already begun to)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 06:50 PM
24

I'll answer in case he doesn't. I believe both sexes have equal opportunity to be logical and rational. However, I believe emotion often clouds logical and rational decisions, and women are more prone to having emotion play a part in decision making. Simply a difference in sex. The potential to be logical is an inherent thing. It's merely the ability to determine the rational over the irrational by using logic. The idea that women are less logical is not because they lack the ability to be logic…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/15 12:46 AM
2

Literally anyone can post on TRP and quite frequently they do. There is some MRA-esque butthurt now and then, but it's usually confined to a few MGTOW who would rather complain than work at being awesome. with this line of reasoning, one could argue all of TRP is random shit from a bunch of different people. You have to look at what sticks and what doesn't. A pattern I see from many posters is anti-feminist, and to ignore that is just ridiculous. Perhaps we just see different posts. We (collecti…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 10:38 PM
0

To each their own
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 09:21 PM
3

Then what is the basis for a "true" moral? What is a truly genuine moral, that is 100% original? They don't even exist beyond subjective human creation
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 09:10 PM
1

I'll ask, why do you see this as inaccurate? Many posts I read on TRP see the feminist movement as a very pro-woman movement, that has left it's roots and gone way too far in modern society. It is one of, if not the main cause of the political correct world we live in today, and only seeks to further it's own interests. Basically a giant sexual strategy that has become unbalanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 09:04 PM
1

The idealized view of the religion is that it's supposed help people and the world as a whole. Yet, this is just the idealized version. What it really is (the truth of it) is what I said originally: a way for people to get into heaven. In reality, religion gave a good excuse for people to fear being bad and love being good. They didn't want to burn, so they were good. Still comes back to selfishness. Just because the end result is "everyone is morally good" doesn't make it any more genuine. The …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 07:12 PM
2

All this is a misunderstanding because they don't have the ability to see the "self" as fluid. They believe it is a solid foundation. If you are mean, you are just permanently mean, until suddenly you're nice. But it's always changing, there is no point where it switches from "fake" to "genuine". It's a progression. AKA learning.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 06:50 PM
7

There's a reason "Fake it til you make it" is so helpful. If everyone was just "who they are" then dicks would always be dicks and awkward people would be awkward. If the awkward guy wants to start to be more socially aware, he may start by "faking" a more outgoing personality, testing the water so to speak. He finds he understands it better when he tries it out. In your case, he's faking. Now imagine he gets so good at it that it becomes second nature. He's learned this new facet of his persona…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 06:47 PM
3

Here-in lies the problem. By this method, TRP is not bad. It all comes back to the individual. We can use the bible as a good example. Following the moral code of christianity is supposed to get you into heaven, right? Then being moral for the sake of going to heaven is manipulation. Unless you are "naturally moral", you're just parroting a moral code made by someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 06:39 PM
0

Exactly. The guide isn't for how to interact with women, as ridiculous as it sounds. That's what PUA is about. Red pill as about changing yourself to the you that more naturally attracts women. You have to internalize it for it to work as it's supposed to. You're not directly learning how to interact with women. You're learning how not to be, and how to be the "you" that actualizes the goals you want. Success with women is a large after effect of that, however, because women are attracted to a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 06:34 PM
6

Not this shit again. You're thinking "feminist" as in that feminist you know, or yourself, or countless other people who stand behind the brand without actually knowing 100% about it. TRP talks about the brand itself, and its power grabbing mentality in modern society. And that's why they see men who have the beliefs of TRP as the problem: it runs counter to the feminist narrative and must be assimilated. Like any other pro-male space.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 04:03 PM
6

TRP sees feminism (the movement) as the source of the problem. Feminists seem to see men (the gender) as the source of the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 03:30 PM
1

That's up for you to decide in your own relationships, not me. Idk why you constantly attempt to bait a response that you can use to your advantage, you're terrible at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 03:10 PM
1

But that's not the only thing we call slut. Slut also means what I said earlier, being a purely sexual person with no other reasons for relationship. You're just disappointed that you aren't able to flip this argument over with that logic. The reason is that your logic is emotional, you're saying you don't like being called a slut for doing slut things. If I did slut things, I deserve to be called a slut. If I really liked doing slutty things, why would I not wanna represent being a slut? It's w…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 05:09 AM
2

that's not even relevant. My question was that, if these women were thinking of TRP, as you said, then they are attracted to people whose whole personality is "created" by all of TRP. It says so in the context of the post. If we're going by that logic, then they're attracted to the same people you're calling bigots.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 10:30 PM
3

but in the context, their "whole personality" is shaped off of TRP, so if they were attracted to them in the first place, they're attracted to TRP's ideals. If that's the case, either they enjoy what they say they don't, or TRP isn't bad in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 10:27 PM
1

And what am I supposed to do with a man other than enjoying his dick? That's for you to decide. If all you enjoy is dick, then sure, that's all there is for you. But language is decided as a collective, because all of us have to use it. As a collective, we agreed that people who focus on sex only are called sluts. I don't understand why we are sluts for doing that. EDIT: I'll make a proof for understanding: [If] People who only use each other for sex are sluts (male or female. You can say womani…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 10:08 PM
8

So they are attracted to a man who used TRP, then are mad that they've been "tricked" into being attracted to something they so vehemently opposed to be attracted to?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 10:02 PM
10

Life is truly absurd. Nihilism really gets the best of everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 09:35 PM
1

That's not rational. But you're using a completely irrelevant argument. I'm saying, by definition, your action (using a man only for his penis) is an action of a slut. Same if a man did it to a woman. Therefore, it's only rational to deduce you're being a slut. You dislike being called a slut, so you (in your head) think that instead of not doing slutty things, that we should change the definition of slut. But, by doing so, you ruin the meaning of the word. Imagine I'm fat. Now, I go around sayi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 07:47 PM
1

Um, what? Okay, so if I act like a dick, people will call me a dick. "But why do I have to change my behavior (not act like a dick) to not be called a dick?" Your logic is awful... You want immunity from a definition that you are actively trying to fit. It's simply irrational.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 04:46 PM
1

it's just how a slut is defined. You're the one assuming a negative connotation. Same thing as a man wanting only women for their vaginas will be a man-slut. Only difference is, men don't care if they're called man-sluts. Women seem to care if they're sluts. Instead of changing behavior, they attempt to redefine "slut" so that they can have their cake and eat it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 03:54 PM
0

Then you will be called a slut, as that's a slut line of thinking. Wasn't the original problem that you didn't want to be called a slut just for "liking a man's dick"? Well, if that's the only reason, you're gonna be called a slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 04:14 AM
0

let alone a fucker who I only want for his dick. who I only want for his dick. only want for his dick. HUGE fucking difference than "liking his dick". You're trying to flip this argument and you're tripping over yourself. Earlier you only wanted him for his dick, now you're going on the defensive saying "I should like his dick right? What's wrong with that? Don't attack me blah blah blah." Bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 03:55 AM
2

Quoting something does little to prove that you actually understand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 03:58 AM
8

As much as this sub says "language doesn't matter", holy shit, I get a headache trying to read abbreviated essays. It's like they're trying to get a point across, but they're not willing to put in the effort to make it actually readable for anyone else.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/15 09:58 PM
4

Obvious when you've seen it, such as red pill philosophy once you've taken the pill. Remember, some people still need swallowing.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/15 07:46 PM
-1

beyond that, what is stopping you from being a dick, even if you just want to be? There is no objective reason for anyone to act any specific manner. There are subjective reasons (not killing randomly for the betterment of society), but deep down, there is no foundation for the basis of what these people believe to be a consistent morality. The funny thing is that they will rationalize anything they do that is inconsistent with their "objective moral foundation" with false reasoning, which leads…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 07:15 PM
-1

again, like I posted yesterday. These people really have no clue what an "objective truth" is. They think that "don't be a dick" just is default. They never ask why they do things, or where the influence for their actions come from. They merely listen and follow. Their morals stem from subjective indoctrination from the beginning of their lives, and they seem to take it as default. I really see why "The Red Pill" has it's name-sake: these people can't see outside their own warped reality and que…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 07:10 PM
2

a personal choice not to date sluts. Is it bad to set your own standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 11:44 PM
1

Regardless of your claim, it is still subjective to human health as a whole. As well as "every other TRPer", that still may not include the next 50, 100, or 100,000 you ask. Morality, regardless of what anyone thinks it ought to be, will always be subjective until the finding of a metaphysical foundation for humans is discovered. There's no way out of it; for example, if morality is a purely evolutionary trait, then anyone who doesn't follow it is either a) a broken human being or b) has evolved…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 05:32 PM
3

You're basically asking people to follow a code of morals that was created for them, not by them, correct? What is this moral code founded on? Who decides what is moral and immoral? In the case of greasy, his argument is that only you can decide what is moral or immoral, because ultimately the only person responsible for your actions is you. Now, if you think there are objective morals that apply to every human being no matter what, then I'd like to hear the basis on that, and a reason that ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 01:26 AM
2

these people can't seem to understand that there is no objective basis for morals, unless there is a god or higher being who sets them. Without a foundation for morals, it's every man for himself. They don't seem to get that...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 01:24 AM
0

Do you think sex for women happens in a vacuum? Most women don't go to bars/ clubs by themselves, their friends see them hooking up with men and going home with them. I have a couple of friends who do hook up with the kind of women who have casual sex, and by and large these girls don't do it under cloak and dagger and in isolation from the rest of society. It would take a hell of a lot of effort to hide sluttery these days, and given that, like I said, sluts aren't really looked down on that mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 04:25 AM
1

All of which is relevant for women who sleep around a lot, but not for women who don't, which, from what I see, is most women, which leads again to the problem of AWALT addressing only female outliers and not the majority of women. which is always going to come back to women not wanting to be seen as sleeping around a lot. that's when hamstering comes in, as a way to rationalize why they aren't sleeping around (it was just a blowjob, didn't count cuz we only made out, etc.) I agree, which is why…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 03:23 AM
1

People, male, female, alpha, whatever, don't date below their 'SMV' generally. 5s generally date 5s, and 10s generally date 10s. I do not believe that the whims of attractive men dictate the straight dating market more than those of attractive women. I still may be misinterpreting "date". Do you mean fuck? Or a relationship? More often than not, an 8 male will fuck a 6 female because why not? However an 8 female will not fuck a 6 male, because they can fuck an 8-9 male. However, they cannot get …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 02:41 AM
2

Did you want anything more than a few flings? If not, no problem. If so, then there are areas to be worked on, clearly.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 02:09 AM
2

Most of the girls I know date guys at a similar level to them date And here is the difference. TRP doesn't say "do not date", but advises against LTRs because of AWALT. So, more often than not, you will see people matching up being of equal SMV. The reason you don't see them dating Alphas, is because an Alpha won't date someone below their SMV, or necessarily date anyone at all (unless by date, you mean see occasionally). might have had one or two one night stands in their whole lives up until t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 01:34 AM
1

I guess it comes down to a difference in how we interpret where these commonalities come from, and what they are specifically. The fundamental idea of AWALT, as I'm sure you've heard, is to treat every gun as loaded, so as to reduce the number of accidents. Regardless of what you and I agree on as AWALT/AMALT, you can agree this is a beneficial strategy when dealing with a group that shares common traits present in all members, especially when those traits are deemed as negative. I will try and …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 01:07 AM
3

I caught it as satire, but I still thought we were attempting debate. However I do think it was a clever way of spinning AWALT, although it kind of misconstrues it's true intentions. It leads me to believe you have a misunderstanding of AWALT. I also think there is an AMALT for women, it just isn't the way you said it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 12:30 AM
1

You've misinterpreted the concept of AWALT/AMALT and aren't even attempting to have a conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 12:11 AM
4

And on top of that, when has "Be yourself! Be a nice guy!" been pushed by large groups of men? If you want advice on how to get women as a man, do you listen to women? Or do you listen to men who have gone through the experience you are wishing to achieve?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 11:29 PM
1

inclusive enough Why do we have to define something in order to include people? The definition (if able to give one, however difficult it is to define) sets the rule of inclusion, not the other way around. We don't define masculinity to make it fair. Masculinity is a thing, and some have it while some don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/15 11:26 PM
2

The sooner men realize this, the faster they get to working on that steel and perfecting their blade (or whatever we are metaphorically building. Could be a fucking fork for all that matters)
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 05:23 AM
13

I came to a similar conclusion a few weeks back: The only thing that can make you stronger is pain. Without overcoming hardship, you will never know how to deal with it when it hits you in the face. The lack of true pain and suffering causes many potentially great men to fall hard in the face of adversity. In a world where people are told "it's okay to be last place" and "at least you tried", those values take root at such an early age that they never get comfortable with being uncomfortable. An…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 11:51 PM
3

Philosophy is a must. It is what separates the followers from the thinkers. Start on anything really. I liked a lot of Nietzsche and his view on Active Nihilism. Nothing matters, so seize the day because you can, basically. Anything on Stoicism will be pushed in this sub, for obvious reasons. Outcome independence and learning to make best of what you can are a huge part of it. After that, just google some philosophies, go to a subreddit, just binge on some reading and open up to any and all poss…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 09:14 PM
12

Biceps + triceps are actually good if they have a nice ratio. They're ornaments on your frame, they like a spoiler or some shit. Just to accent.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 08:26 PM
1

I suspect, again, that the less testosterone a person has on average, the more prone to lying they are. I don't see how this has much to do with it. Testosterone may make you less likely to fear facing the consequences of actions, therefore more prone to not covering up your mistakes with lies. However lying can be a very useful tool and isn't always a "bad" thing.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 08:50 PM
3

I 100% agree. It's possible that there isn't even "psychopathy" and sociopathy", just many, many different combinations of disorders that manifest in similar ways, giving the illusion of dichotomy
/r/TheRedPill13/06/15 05:09 PM
3

Correct, sociopaths most likely don't feel empathy at all, while conversely psychopaths have control over when they feel it. The stereotype of psychopath = sociopath is very common in modern culture, but we've discovered that neither are as simple as they seem. Both seem to be multiple disorders that culminate in what we call "psychopathy" or "sociopathy". They're both characterized by anti-social personality disorder, each with their own amalgam of other disorders and quirks. https://www.psycho…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/15 04:52 PM
17

I managed to beat cancer, so it can't be THAT dangerous
/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 03:36 PM
2

This reminds me of myself around a year ago. It will progress as long as you let YOURSELF let go of that anger. Let it turn into something useful. Instead of planning revenge, just think, "Fuck 'em" and move on. If you plan on getting revenge every time a woman screws you or your friends over, you're gonna be one busy man.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 04:02 PM
6

...then they obviously don't understand that lifting doesn't really consume that much time. In the time they finish their episode of America's Got Talent or some shit, you spent your time wisely, at the gym.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 02:45 AM
7

maybe one day the skepticism will wear off
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:23 PM
12

Eh, it's more like he's pointing out that while the girls may claim to have been raped, they also may assume regret = rape. We have no idea if the defendant is guilty or not, but the point he made is a good one. We have to account for all variables
/r/MensRights08/04/15 06:07 AM
5

truths exist independently of your desire for them to be true or untrue. aka "the red pill"
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 09:17 PM
0

Football is like Gladiator Sport of the modern era. However it is still a human construct, and the achievements are just as made up as videogame ones.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 01:20 AM
3

Is it not possible to be both a gamer and athlete? I personally enjoy lifting and exercise, but still like coming home to an hour or two of gaming instead of mindless TV. At least this way I can hone my reaction time and critical thinking skills
/r/TheRedPill01/03/15 05:44 PM
2

It's basically a "coming of age" movie, it can make some people question a lot in their lives
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 07:03 PM
3

Most intelligent guys are genetic dead ends with pathetic, weak seed. I'm genuinely curious what makes you say this? I have seen little evidence that correlates high intelligence with bad genetics.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/15 01:34 AM
6

begin to take pictures with them in the background, then delete them and say "shit all those fatties got in the way"
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 03:16 AM
17

This movie was more amazing than I anticipated. Some of the absurdity just can't be found anywhere else
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/14 10:58 PM
1

The hunter/gatherer comparison was actually a pretty fresh analogy to me, I forgot how intelligent Chapelle can be using only comedy
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 07:35 PM
122

Exactly! If she wanted to get physical help, why didn't she try herself? Oh wait right, that's not her job as a woman, she's there to scream and bitch. Better call the men!
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/14 01:39 AM
320

I love the expected white-knighting, and then the crying. "Not ONE MAN will defend this woman?!" LMAO Then the bitch behind the camera trying to make it seem like Wal-Mart is just full of "Men who beat on a woman"
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/14 01:20 AM
1

Okay, where did abuse come in? And once again, you use hate like you know what it means. I dont think you know what that words means. When looking at the KKK (I'll use this as a point because you mentioned them first) what are their main points? "Whites are better, Colored people are worse." Now when looking at TRP, what are their main points? It's not "Hate and abuse women" it's "Beat the current social system by bettering yourself, learning sexual strategy, and taking advantage of systems in p…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:25 AM
1

Yes you should ignore it. It does 20x better without ignorant statements like yours. However it does generate more viewers... Hmmm weird how a "women hating" subreddit can generate so many new viewers every time someone bashes it. Oh wait, it's because a lot of it makes sense. If you're bashing entire subreddits off of things a few people say (some of which are clearly trolls or people purposefully undermining the true core tenants of redpill which do not advocate hate for women), this subreddit…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:16 AM
3

Very well put. I'll have to save this!
/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:43 PM
1

Dude. Stop equating commentary to action. The KKK acted. They killed blacks, tore up towns, rampaged, campaigned actively against color. They said they HATED colored people. Like fervent hate. Now here youre saying that the KKK = Red Pill. Lmao. Are you a dude? Ever been dumped by a girl? Maybe a few? then you get that period of time where you and your friends are just like "Man fuck girls who needs them." Red Pill is a group of those guys, coming together and saying we should find a better way …
/r/MensRights12/11/14 09:26 PM
1

I didn't know that sub was only a few hundred people. Because it's not. That amount in those comments are slightly angry, slightly comical. If you were a part of the sub, you would understand the commentary and banter. The sub regularly discusses and like to point out that there is no hate for women. It's merely a recognition of a social pattern, And The Red Pill is meant to beat that pattern and make it work in your favor. It's fighting fire with fire. Then rumors of women-hate and racism get s…
/r/MensRights12/11/14 08:45 PM
1

They including all redpillers right? But don't generalize, right? This is way worse than the stickers you see of a man bowing to a women, or "Girls are better than Boys" kind of stickers, right? Both sexes talk shit, feminism isn't exactly squeaky clean when it comes to man-hating. Yet I do not call all feminists man haters. I see comments in all-female subreddits about men being worthless, and women ruling the world much better, etc. etc. But I don't let it get to me because they're just trolls…
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:04 PM
1

give me a source where Red Pill is shown to actively hate women and from a post above me: The negativity you hear about TRP is generally no different than the negativity you hear about numerous other "men's groups", or groups that grate against the Feminist ideological grain. GamerGate is a good example. A few trolls send threats to Feminists and suddenly everyone thinks GamerGate is inherently misogynistic.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 04:02 AM
4

I'm happy that nowadays people can actually reference redpill without seething anger, while being reasonable. Progress!
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:35 PM
0

damn she sure hit the wall
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:02 AM
19

That face is one for the record books of pants-shitting
/r/TheRedPill02/11/14 04:07 AM
1

You win the Internet argument I forfeit, I'm gonna go outside
/r/MensRights02/08/14 07:29 AM
2

Wat I was just pointing out what he said lol you're pretty hostile, does this hit close to home or something?
/r/MensRights02/08/14 06:10 AM
3

It proves his point because showing that matriarchal societies do not exist, could in fact be because his point that "Women can't lead a society" and that's why you or anyone else can't find any recent matriarchal societies, because theoretically by his standard they do not function to the same strength as a patriarchal society
/r/MensRights01/08/14 10:56 PM
1

I kept reading wondering when it would end, but I'd say worth the read although incredibly long lol
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 05:02 AM
9

I think he meant manipulative not just educated. Women aren't dumb they just rely on feelies but will do anything to get those good tingles so they act borderline psychopathic
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 08:10 AM
1

So you are willing to watch this video and doubt he has mental illness? And that someone can kill due to mental illness and not as often due to misogyny? Psychopaths make up the majority of those kills and I guarantee they all had just as ridiculous reasons as misogyny, but it was always due to the mental illness. This is a joke.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:19 PM
1

Maybe if misogyny didn't start because of his mental issues, but I'm proposing that his misogyny is due to illness and not it's own thing
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:07 PM
1

Agreed more would help, but it is pretty clear mental illness is at play. It's in line with other mentally ill killers and is nowhere near similar to average everyday men who may feel bitter towards women
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:11 PM
2

I'd say he doesn't commit the crime in either situation, but people are blaming misogyny. Misogyny, if it is present, is a result of the mental illness and not the other way around. Therefore the key culprit is the mental illness itself. Yet I see tons of posts and stories and blogs stating that this man is a perfect example of why men rule society. No one seems to be standing up for the fight against mental instability though.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:56 PM
0

much like a guy with tourettes yelling "Nigger! Fucking cocksucking nigger!" can be called racist, yes. I will agree you can post the name on it and idiots will follow. But you have to look at the real reason these things are being said/done. And that is mental illness.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:49 PM
2

Sorry, I'm angered by how often people won't take into account how much biology affects things like this. You seem pretty reasonable, but your statement seemed very ridiculous, because I fail to see any reason misogyny should even be brought up after seeing this man is clearly mentally ill. It's hard to blame something as the cause when it isn't the cause at all, unless you have a big enough movement and enough force to convince people otherwise. I truly believe this is all a result of mental il…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:42 PM
3

hahaha, yes because mental illness is not a tier above social issues. If something is BIOLOGICALLY wrong with their brain, you're going to blame someone for skewing BIOLOGICAL evidence against something caused by SOCIAL issues? There's a reason you can plead insanity, but not misogynist. Mental illness gives rise to many other problems, like this guys psychopathy. However I don't believe there is one case where being a misogynist has lead to someone gaining a certifiable mental illness. It doesn…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:30 PM
-2

Isn't misogyny more of a direct, chosen path to go down? People with tourettes that shout nigger aren't racist, they can't help it. It's a pattern in there brain that's fucked up, this guy most likely had a mental illness that made him seem misogynist, but it was not because of misogyny, it was because of mental illness. Saying he was misogynist and blaming culture/misogyny is just skewing facts to look good as an agenda against "the patriarchy".
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:15 PM
2

It's easier to skew something for your cause than to admit it has nothing to do with it
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:13 PM
3

As does mental illness, which could easily be masked by what people want to point out as misogyny. If he had gotten an exam and been told to be severely psychotic, would it still be misogyny to blame? Or the mental illness
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:02 PM
20

Gotta love the white knights rushing to defend some of those women in there. Reddit is seriously getting retarded when it comes to feminist ideals and putting women on pedestals, instead of acknowledging the inequalities and taking advantage by trying to educate themselves, the men jump ship and try and give women power over themselves, wtf?
/r/TheRedPill14/04/14 05:31 AM
3

I don't think he means sociopathic in a bad sense. Sociopaths are actually the most logical people by definition. Just like what he said above, Sociopaths do not abide by how things "should" work in society, they instead manipulate others to their own will because that is how it "does" work.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 05:32 AM
13

Why do they need justification for liking a show with a "horrible" protagonist? I'm so confused why they even asked that question... "Reddit why do a lot of people like this? I've been told not to like this. Why do I like this?"
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 04:19 AM
40

By check it I thought you meant privilege hahaha
/r/MensRights24/02/14 07:59 AM
5

I would imagine the whole answer is to simply not think that way. It's a sexual game, for you to try and get ahead. You wouldn't want anyone fucking your sister, but that doesn't stop you from getting laid right? Simply put, they're not your damn sister. Also, would a true Dark Triad alpha really care about this shit?
/r/TheRedPill26/01/14 05:19 PM
3

exactly. feminists cannot claim gender equality and then go around putting 'women's rights or bust' on everything
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:31 PM
3

don't worry, you're in the right on this one
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter