TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ayywumao Archive

View 0 posts and 463 comments by ayywumao on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Ah, so discussing factually is whining.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 02:08 PM
1

It structurally favours women. It's the same bullshit painted in a favourable light. Unless she actually makes a point to be the one to invite on every second date, it's just sham reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/19 01:56 PM
1

Yet, it is entirely predictable that a person too ignorant to actually check what it is they are commenting on, would also think that their anecdote means shit, versus objective data.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 03:38 PM
1

I read the whole thread. He is right, you are wrong. It is entirely predictable that a person that didn't even bother to read the article, then thinks their anecdotal evidence is equal to other people's studies. The rest is just sour grapes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/19 08:03 AM
1

It's like people misusing the word 'honestly' "honestly (insert positive thing about themselves" yeah, technically it's a correct sentence. Only idiots think that's reasonable though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 04:54 PM
1

non sequitur
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 04:43 PM
1

Except he clearly used his own agency to enact the change. The genetics were useless before he got fit, and even less attractive people benefit from fitness. So you focusing on the part that cannot be influenced, while ignoring the extremely beneficial part that can be influenced, just makes you sound like you prefer to hide behind 'facts'.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 08:40 AM
1

You've got weird priorities if you think "real men eat meat" is one of the most impactful aspects of 'toxic masculinity'. What OP is asking what social standards and norm women enforce and encourage by their behaviours, not what they do that damages themselves personally. That many reply focus on what they do that hurts themselves, personally.. well, it's not exactly surprising and fits right into what I said concerning institutionalized hypoagency.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 08:35 AM
1

you're ignoring the whole part where 'toxic masculinity damages men the most' is just a cover argument, because the real idea is 'toxic masculinity is bad for women'. Why should people not focus on the real relevant part then? So, modern feminism, that tries to place the blame any imbalance among the genders on evil men, while taking no accountability for women's behaviours. That's institutionalized hypoagency.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 07:40 AM
1

yeah, and when they are the main enforcers of it, why is it called the patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 07:33 AM
1

you're old. get over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 07:41 PM
1

Ah, the good old no true scotsman.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 07:31 PM
1

Have you actually addressed my point?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 07:17 PM
1

of course not. but you have no credible argument to claim it's not the rate of fuckwomen is low in the base population, but rather the userbase here doesn't know of their existence. Occam's razor tells you it's the first.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 07:06 PM
1

True. However there is no data to prove a bias. so just assuming it is just poor form.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 06:52 PM
1

Reddit is one of the most visited sites in the US. The whole reddit consists of lonely nerds thing has died years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 05:52 PM
1

Maybe the lack of examples is indicative of the underlying variable?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 05:41 PM
1

Just another in an array of unimaginative arguments of the same sort that have been really common on this sub recently. Do they really think they‘ve stumbled on some truth or insight?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 05:40 PM
1

Great. So what?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 02:39 PM
1

It does not. Women who eat more than they need to because they are on birth control are gaining weight because they are eating more than they need to.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 02:39 PM
1

No, estrogen does not make people fat. Eating more calories than needed makes people fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 01:30 PM
1

The whole point of these threads that eating a healthy diet is 'starving yourself'. Once that claim goes by unchallenged, these women can then 'justifiably' claim that men's preferences are literal violence against women. Hamstering is all it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 01:29 PM
1

I love it when some numbnuts woman on here thinks she had a stroke of genius in just mirroring arguments, as if that somehow carries any meaning. Men are more varied than women. Fact. There are more genius men than among women, and there are more shitheads than among women. AMALT is far less likely than AWALT for that very fact alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/19 01:49 PM
1

So you‘re not saying it‘s not true, you‘re just saying he makes it seem like it‘s not true by making it a mantra.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/19 06:15 AM
1

A stoic attitude is commendable and advantageous. Recognizing that the playing field is steep is not incorrect, however. When Tinder (ie. cross strata communication) enables women to access the top men and vice verse, then that makes it harder for everyone else. Pointing that out is not whining, it's just an observation. Note, I didn't complain about those guys. Most were likeable dudes, and they can't be blamed for taking the women that throw themselves at them. Nonetheless, if every women can …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 02:21 PM
1

who has ever gotten sex for just existing? Chad thundercock with his trustfund that can pull dozens of women a month just by repping on social media. I didn't think it was this way until I spent a year abroad in a Tier 1 city surrounded by rich expats.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/19 01:52 PM
1

I mean just because you fail at reading comprehension, and didn't realize that what he was doing was describing a situation he deplores, not one he envisions, that doesn't mean he can't keep his story straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/19 08:10 AM
1

IF YOU WERENT SUCH A WEAK PUSSY MAYBE THEY WOULD LOVE YOU also it's your fault
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/19 11:29 AM
1

Clarify is a big word for your bogus bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 08:40 PM
1

Well, thanks for joining this conversation without input
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 03:58 PM
1

I don’t know of any women lecturing men on what they should find attractive lalalala I can't hear you I don't know anybody who doesn't know anybody that...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 03:44 PM
1

What's with half the people in this thread, that can't type a damn sentence not littered with typos?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/19 02:09 PM
1

Why are you here?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/19 07:06 AM
1

If she can’t adapt her views to match her capability, yeah, she and everyone else is better off with her alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 09:26 PM
1

Why should they exactly? Seems accurately assessing reality is in fact rather healthy. The definition of healthy is not "most apt to just play nice"/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 06:51 AM
1

1/3
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 06:46 AM
0

Its sad that she's ugly, but she's better off alone and single than with someone she does not desire. pfft complete lack of responsibility towards oneself in shaping one's own desires to reflect reality. If you want to be happy you owe it to yourself to change your attitude to allow you to live the life you actually can live, rather than the one you desire. Stubborn.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 06:41 AM
1

Drinking age is 16 where I'm from, therefore it's not creepy at all. Just trying to point out the strange litmus.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 06:25 AM
2

Like the 5% of truth in there is that mediocre women are generally more sexually valuable than mediocre men. But that's like "No duh, biology will tell you that". This is indeed the point, and it is massively important. 80% of people are sorta average.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/19 09:47 PM
4

The main character, the one women are supposed to relate with, rejects Gaston, again, and again. The character men are supposed to relate with, is a literal incel, waiting for his pixie - to rescue him.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/19 09:01 PM
2

Even if this is sarcasm this grinds my gears. I judge films by how plausible they are. Most films don't have the 'magic' or 'art' factor to justify implausibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/19 05:48 PM
0

What a stupid attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/19 09:13 AM
1

Right and if you refuse to engage what people are saying, and instead quip back based on some physical interpretation of a metaphor, you can choose to do that and hide at home.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 07:58 AM
1

Metaphorically you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 08:02 PM
1

No communication is also a form of communication. Capitalist mechanisms also exist in communist systems. Evolution is happening regardless of belief. A game you're refusing to participate in is still a game that is in progress, and that you may even be losing without ever having acknowledged it's existence. Whatever behaviour you may choose to title 'not playing a game' is still just a strategy in that game.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 07:56 PM
1

It's not a game. Yes it is. But I'm not playing it. Not playing is still playing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 01:36 PM
1

It's not an opt in/opt out game.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/19 07:21 AM
1

No that's not what I said. Goodbye.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 01:56 PM
2

Dude wat instead of trying to project something listen to what he's saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 11:53 AM
1

Sure, but that's neither what I said, what he said, nor what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 11:44 AM
1

Ah, yes, the high bar of 'graduating'.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 11:25 AM
1

full of people fucking around and partying and drinking and doing drugs Yeah, and those are the people fucking around, not working hard at a demanding degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 10:41 AM
8

That being successful is more about being dominant than about being nice. That the mothers gripes with men shouldn't constrain the child in his development to be the man he can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 10:37 AM
6

You guys also think it means people are saying masculinty is toxic. Because some people do say that. This has been discussed ad nauseum, so why not just drop the act?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 10:33 AM
5

Actually I am doing that right now. I tried being fun, it wasn't good. Now I prefer to actively not be fun, and it allows me to succeed where it matters most. I'm not good at the meta game of balancing 'appearing fun' and 'getting the important shit done'.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 10:31 AM
7

Top minds.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 10:26 AM
1

Hard facts filtered through the lens of a biased observer.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 05:22 AM
1

Nah I didn't. The text was nothing more than picking and choosing what studies suited the writers goals. Qualitative science isn't science.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 05:40 PM
1

I am happy to help. Wouldn't want people to think you're an idiot that doesn't understand the difference between a quantitative study and a qualitative assessment that amounts to opinion now, wouldn't we.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 10:29 AM
1

You could say that, but how does that relate to anything concerning how alcohol chemically acts in the brain?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 08:51 PM
1

To tell you how dumb that expectation is.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 02:33 PM
1

Yet it's always situational.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 02:32 PM
1

So not a study then.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 02:32 PM
1

You are correct. But don't expect the kind of minds who populate this forum to understand what you're saying. They're incapable. I bow down to your genius. Apart from that, that's not a study, you fucking moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 05:12 AM
0

It's so funny. People string up these grand theories, and then they can't even keep the different camps apart. Speaking of thesaurus: Maybe go read a book.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 05:05 AM
1

Are you saying that because you had to look up effeminate?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 05:00 AM
1

It's purely situational. Situational hypergamy is a redundant way of saying hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 04:57 AM
1

Not worth my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 04:54 AM
1

U a right genius mate. Go and gene on.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 04:54 AM
1

Do you think I have a library of lookmatches saved somewhere or what?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/19 04:01 PM
1

And your definition of equality has nothing to do with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/19 07:57 AM
1

Your shoehorning your definition of equality into the definition of SMW and RMW. It doesn't fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/19 07:47 AM
1

Doubbbbbbt it. When has this ever been true for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/19 07:41 AM
1

Except that's not relevant, because they are still competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 10:06 PM
1

You took opposing views in two consecutive comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 10:05 PM
1

No, I just mean that you're more about contradicting people than having a consistent view yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 10:34 AM
1

nice math
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 05:42 AM
1

IOIs A basic tenet of communication is that the addressee is part of the message. If the addressee can't understand the message, is it really communication?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 05:36 AM
1

You're a right contrarian aren't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 05:30 AM
1

Unless I missed something in health class women aren't born age 12.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 09:14 PM
1

Instead your kid has to compete with the older children of other men. Great condition for survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 09:12 PM
1

The idea that this is somehow a superior mating strategy is total bullshit though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 09:07 PM
3

Imagine not having a functioning immune system. This meme was made by Can Eat Peanuts Crew.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 09:05 PM
5

such as good hip to waist ratio, looking at the current east asian beauty standard, I'm inclined to doubt that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 09:02 PM
4

Yeah, short hair is mostly a remnant of roman culture, readopted at various times by Westerners, and finally spread world wide as the dominant fashion by modern western armies.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 08:53 PM
1

That's bunk. Social media is not in any shape of form a reflection of 'true desire' or 'true self'. It's just a newer meta of smoke and mirrors, that doesn't make it truer than previous forms of the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 08:51 PM
1

I disagree with your notion that complaining about things is invalid. Information exchange doesn't suddenly stop existing, just because it's something you don't seem worthy of attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 07:27 PM
2

I assure you I have a pleasant odor.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 07:26 PM
1

probably not worth it, as I can already smell what you're getting at.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 06:58 PM
1

Nice try
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 06:51 PM
1

Fat single mothers want hot dudes who will be devoted to them. And boy do they cry about that not working out.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 06:46 PM
1

most they can have there =/= what is there
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 06:49 AM
1

frigid cunt
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 06:42 AM
1

LOL, men bitching all women at Tinder are uggos. What, when, where, who?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 06:27 AM
1

Oh, man, got me there. Didn't even notice.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 09:12 AM
1

No, I actually just am a smart jerk.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 09:10 AM
1

No, I'm here to type.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 09:07 AM
1

that can be seen in my first paragraph. Yes, that does not make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 09:06 AM
1

I honestly think that would change after the first few casual hookups. Your need for validation goes down because it's being fulfilled, but also because you realize it's not all that important in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 06:00 AM
1

You should not act like you making an argument for something makes it materialize as fact. Just cut the bullshit attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 05:54 AM
1

that can be seen in my first paragraph. That's not how that works. Your words aren't something that 'can be seen', as if you saying it somehow makes it an observable fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 05:20 AM
5

Good for you, but you are not a statistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 05:03 AM
1

Yeah, if you ignore the fact that hd hardcore porn is a massive success, I guess that seems like a reasonable question.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 04:56 AM
1

Dude your arguments are so disingenuous it's amazing. Such an annoyingly dishonest way of arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 04:08 AM
1

In a vacuum this is true. In reality I know my confidence is up when I know I look good, and it's down when I know I look like a hobo.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 03:33 AM
2

SMV is not a clear upgrade to RMV. Fuckboi may never be able to settle down into a proper relationship until he develops his RMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 07:46 PM
1

how?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 06:45 PM
1

never seen that claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/19 06:20 PM
1

Sorry, can't hear you mumbling over there on the fringe. You can't even spell sphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/19 08:24 AM
1

No, really, TWO whole documentaries? That must be the mainstreamiest mainstream that ever streamed the mains. Get real.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 09:16 PM
1

Well they wouldn't wouldn't they.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 01:52 PM
1

He says while ignoring the glaring fact that the statistic in the OP proves that things are in fact worse now.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 07:21 AM
10

So if men outweigh women in a given field, then it's sexism, but when the table flips withing a very short time span, accompanied by observable changes in how boys perform in the education system, then it's anything but sexism. Gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 06:53 AM
1

How could something as fringe as red pill affect population trends in such a massive way. Yeah, that doesn't even deserve a question mark.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 06:49 AM
1

Nice non sequitur.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 04:52 PM
1

You did, but it still makes no sense to assume something untrue to get a better view of reality, when it doesn't actually help get a better grasp of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 04:47 PM
1

Pretending untrue things are true is not practical.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 03:04 PM
1

The part where it's not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 02:46 PM
1

Why would it apply to people looking behind the curtain?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 09:43 AM
1

Seems like they could make a "killing" in that environment. Unless of course, not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 03:55 PM
2

What people narrate for themselves and what their hormones demand of them aren't always the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 09:03 AM
4

Your argument doesn't lend itself to the conclusion. Men aren't a collective, the individuals still have the same biological imperative, regardless of system. So pointing out that more men get laid through monogamy doesn't contradict the fact that it's still the individual desire to go out and try for more. Either way, the idea that monogamy is gods grace to save men from the peril of alpha domination isn't all too accurate in itself, considering that harems can only be held with the social cohe…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 08:54 AM
2

It's a stale meme of a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 08:49 AM
1

Never seen something like that here, and I've been here for a decade. As I said. Different bubbles.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 09:41 PM
0

if women overall would think of sexual pleasure as something both partners need to work on vs something SHE has to GET as an emergent property of the man, then yes, they would be taking responsibility for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 09:17 PM
1

halle berry ,angelina jolieand Jennifer aniston are constantly ridiculed by people online for failing to keep a man Where the fuck are you even seeing these people mentioned. You and I must be in vastly different bubbles.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 09:12 PM
1

I'm just saying it's the man who loses more in such "marriage". k, and I'm saying that's not necessarily the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 09:06 PM
1

But I brought them up...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:05 PM
1

You realize that a marriage where the man has license to bed other women as long as he doesn't skimp out on caring for the family falls under than umbrella?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 02:07 PM
1

Evidently not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 12:18 PM
1

ut how many men wouldn’t even give the light of day if she was upfront about it? so what? So there’s some justification for it lol no? her lot sucks, but it's hers.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/03/19 09:21 AM
1

Maybe they shouldn't seek to marry men they don't desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 08:23 AM
1

No, that's just a stupid power fantasy. I think reducing alimony to a mechanically short term stopgap, as opposed to a life long lifeline, changing laws surrounding proof of paternity, making access to the children more equitable, etc. would help a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 08:05 AM
1

For one, open marriages are a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 07:39 AM
1

Only because people were shamed into marriage back in the day. Today stricter marriage laws would be beneficial. It would increase the meaning of marriage, but in a context where people don't marry as often anyways. Why would I get legally married today? All loss, no gain.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 07:33 AM
1

He's just being factual. Horrific or not. You're basically accosting him for just telling the truth, when it's surely the truth you don't like?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 07:31 AM
5

Women are only riding the CC because the alternative- Not riding the CC? I think you forgot to ascribe agency to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 07:27 AM
2

Jokes on them, I'm just acting retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 07:26 AM
3

by my definition, any man that cheats is low status. no. status is an aggregate value, and isn't "things i don't like are low status"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 07:23 AM
2

Oh man, guess he made a point about particle physics, because after all, you can't have sex without employing the particles in his body. You're a smart cookie.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 02:13 PM
1

That doesn't make what he said about anatomy. He didn't say anything about the structural composition of anybody's body.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 12:56 PM
1

no trust me, I really don't have any introspection!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 09:02 PM
1

God your logic sucks asss
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 11:02 PM
0

I like how some people here try what you are trying. The stats don't lie, and just mirroring RP rhetoric isn't enough to make it true.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 11:00 PM
2

Oh, and is a meta-study by the American Psychological Association (APA) good enough for you? https://www.apa.org/monitor/2011/11/sex-differences Bit late to feel snarky about having proof, don't ya think? I thought I made this very clear Wasn't clear to me. Cheers.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 10:44 PM
1

I don't think you have a factual claim here. That's a very anecdotal way of arguing, and I don't see it as confirmation for the assumption that men externalize their feelings. In fact, internet fora are, to me at least, indicative of the very fact that men don't externalize their feelings enough, not until they come out in a very ugly manner. Either way, without some real stats, this conversation won't convince me one way or another.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 10:29 PM
1

That love happens after the filtering that happens before she ever had a chance to fall in love with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 08:15 PM
1

I wasn't criticizing, I was just pointing out, that seeing this is natural and absolute is notable in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 08:14 PM
1

The way you worded it, it almost seems like you think that not comparing yourself to all the women near you is a weird concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 06:46 PM
3

I don't see how that study relates to what you are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 06:44 PM
1

because men externalize wut
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 06:43 PM
1

So love isn't blind. Unless you're saying league is only looks, not everything included in status.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 06:42 PM
5

I'm not surprised the only place with higher neuroticism in women than the west is the middle east.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 06:41 PM
1

I really find this amusing. It's insightful on the one hand, but also funny on the other, in how you think it's so unthinkable that you wouldn't be comparing yourself to women irrelevant to your life. As a guy, I'm more interested on whether I can match the attractiveness of women, because it's a measure of my odds. I really don't care about what some chads are up to, I really don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 06:33 PM
1

almost daily. yeah... almost
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 08:05 AM
1

Very long run means the effects they have on the population even after they've died. The life of the average person is financially a net positive for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/19 08:41 PM
1

This kills your argument because you don't understand what very long run means.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/19 09:19 AM
0

Asks question, get's answer. muh irony and by your reasoning, no
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 05:16 PM
1

You are not compelled to have children nor is an individual responsible for the failure of the race. How am I confused about this? I didn't say anything that implies confusion about this. People should uphold their civic responsibilities, and I am not up for a philosophical debate about what that means. Those people don't owe it to the future to have kids now, especially when, until recently, there were far fewer of us populating the Earth. The very long run is irrelevant, we are talking about t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 04:30 PM
0

eople without kids pay more in taxes Not in a way that offsets not having kids. Have you never actually filed your own taxes before? I can't eye-roll any harder without dislodging my eyeballs. What have I said that isn't constructive? case in point Have you never actually filed your own taxes before? They don't exist, so it's a nonissue. ???????? Their nonexistence is the whole fucking issue. You didn't address the fact that some people have can't have kids. Can you get any more irrelevant? The …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 04:08 PM
1

Well if you want to go down that road then why are my taxes helping to pay for schools when I don't have any children? Because it's in society's interest to force you to. Working childless people pay a lot more into the system than they get out of it. Except for the critical part, where they don't provide any future payers. Pay you back for what? The taxes you have to pay because it's your duty? I'm not sure how not providing future tax payers somehow means you get to demand money from society.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 03:40 PM
1

No concession made, Don Quixote.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 03:38 PM
1

No it doesn't. He added no kids that will add to the pot. What a gross mentality to have. The only thing gross here is your inability to have a constructive discussion. Everyone pays taxes. Not the children people didn't have. Thereby reducing the size of the pot. While still taking from the pot when old.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 03:36 PM
2

As I said, the issue is that the system abstracts away the direct correlation of having children and having someone to take care of you when you're old. That you don't mention parents doing all the things you do, and the children paying taxes into the system that enables medicare just goes to show.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 03:19 PM
1

There is also an ethical concern. If someone works for 40+ years, are they not entitled to a pension after paying taxes for that long? In a system that relies on future generations to exist to work, shouldn't they do their part in ensuring the future existence of the system? No kids = no future system.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 03:17 PM
0

No they're not. Your taxes go in the pot regardless of me having kids. You not having kids means there will be less going into the pot in the next generation. but i accept it, you are arguing feelings instead of reals.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 03:16 PM
2

Lol, because 50 years of me paying taxes doesn't count, right? Compared to people who pay taxes and have children that will pay taxes? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 02:30 PM
-1

Well, in a vacuum I don't either. But don't come running to me, when you need care and can't afford it. Don't want kids? Fine, but don't expect mine to pay the taxes to support your old ass. If having children increasingly becomes a lifestyle choice instead of the absolute norm, we as a society need to change some assumptions about how to run society. People are weirded out by the Chinese way, where taking care of the parents in old age is responsibility of the children, because there is some so…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 01:41 PM
3

you know it's true because it's in the dailymail
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/19 09:22 AM
2

unless she is genuinely an outlier, which I highly doubt. wat Also, a 28-year-old should not be around a 19-year-old, no matter how "legal" that is. watwat
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 08:42 AM
1

to be 18 no we don't. not in most places anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 08:30 AM
1

“letting women define femininity.” back to the play area now, hush hush
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 09:15 AM
3

I will absolutely not be bound by 95% of laws and legislation of moden nation states kek
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 09:05 AM
0

yawn. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=red+pill+hypergamy
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 07:17 PM
1

I'll take that as a yes to my question because I CLEARLY hit a nerve. nice comeback dummy NONE OF YOU are explaining the difference. . Reference back to the dictionary . ironic i'll give you a hint: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=red+pill+hypergamy Welcome to the current millennium
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 07:14 PM
1

Don't expect me to care whether or not you care. And the information is available, so the only one not putting effort here is you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 07:12 PM
2

You cant expect people to understand you when you do a piss poor job explaining it! Yes you can. The onus on informing yourself is on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 08:28 AM
3

Are you guys trying to sound smart? At least we don't sound dumb as fuck unlike you. RP has been around for a decade or more, if you don't understand the definition of the words they are using in the way they are using them, then that's because you are not informed. That you think (or rather pretend to, because it is easier to argue against) what they describe is the exact equivalent of 'gold digging' just shows your lack of mental faculty. Misunderstanding an argument, then misconstruing, then …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 08:23 AM
1

no
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 08:15 AM
2

Why can't you just be informed about the topic you want to discuss?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 08:08 AM
1

Monogamy you dunce. lmao. why do you think the religious institution of marriage exists? Exactly to counteract monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 08:07 AM
3

Especially when the proofs are contradicting each other in different thread segments.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 08:06 AM
4

But that is not what hypergamy describes. The behaviours are decidedly not equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 07:54 AM
1

Guys just want the same deal women get out of sexual liberation. Unrealistic, but not really immoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 07:51 AM
2

People bleeding out get really thirsty.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/19 10:23 AM
9

That sure seems like a lot of words to basically agree with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 07:53 PM
1

What a cunticle you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/19 03:42 PM
10

It’s caused me problems in the past and I know longer wish to partake. So my point stands. Grow a pair, lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/19 06:43 PM
4

(as do men). how so? i have spent almost none of the past 15 years single. being bisexual Did you maybe leave out an inconvenient truth?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 10:05 PM
2

(x) doubt
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 10:52 AM
1

Are you saying Fox News is leftist propaganda?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/12/18 01:27 AM
2

He's asking for compassion, not a paycheck.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/12/18 12:31 AM
2

Which he only cares about because it's not him.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 10:10 PM
1

You're evading my point. Yes, he is attempting to shame you for your behaviour, which is not hooking up with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 09:58 PM
2

So you agree it's not actual disapproval of your behaviour, rather than just jealousy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 07:54 PM
2

You having english as a second language is no excuse for the amount of typos in your comment that make it absolutely unreadable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 02:29 PM
1

The only embarrassing thing here is your persona.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 01:50 PM
1

you're going to make six figures by throwing out random words that don't mean what you think they mean? Cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 12:57 PM
1

it would help if your point actually made sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 11:39 AM
3

being called a slut as a basic insult because someone is upset at you is not what slut shaming is. otherwise there would be a lot of asshole shaming on this world. I don't think people have strong opinions on the assholes of other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 11:38 AM
0

lmao. i doub't you're a pharmacist. It's impossible to interpret from this, what you think a strawman is, but this is not it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 11:35 AM
1

So it's not a problem then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 11:13 AM
1

Yeah, he would be affected by your inability to act like an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 02:24 AM
1

Yep, and that would be on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 02:08 AM
0

9
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 10:26 AM
1

Learn to deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 10:24 AM
0

Gotta love these backwards expectation. Reminds me of the rule "you shouldn't date a friends ex." Really, the most important relationship a person can have in their life should take the backseat to your expectations of what their friendship to you entails? Maybe you're a bit self absorbed, if you think your stupid assumptions are more important than others happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 10:24 AM
1

If it's not scientific it's not anymore reliable than a horoscope. If you claim it is more accurate, prove it. If you can't well tough luck. if you can, congratulations, you did some science.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/18 12:30 AM
1

You do you man.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 06:21 PM
1

sure thing buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 06:20 PM
1

yeah, that's true character. lmbob
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 11:52 AM
3

not even anthros can take themselves seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 11:45 AM
3

So you agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 10:23 PM
1

if you say so
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 10:20 PM
1

Well that seems overly simplistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/18 08:46 AM
1

Seems like you're using contradicting arguments. You said modern technology made bravery superfluous, but despite this, you're apparently able to tell who was braver despite the use of modern technology.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/18 03:58 PM
2

The existence of these people kind of proves them right in their own way, concerning imminent threat of upheaval. It's something that both the right and left should not forget. Introduce too drastic changes to society in a fast manner, and you provoke malcontents into action. Whether it's xenophobes provoked by sudden increases in immigration, or the poor and mistreated provoked by worse labour conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/18 11:08 AM
1

So? They used modern weapons, you said it yourself, they change everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 09:55 PM
1

The South had by far the hardiest men, and if the war had been fought with spears and war-axes, they'd certainly have defeated the North. Source needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 03:45 PM
3

It creates a learning opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 04:09 PM
1

Just lowering myself to your standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 10:19 AM
-2

Empty words devoid of meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 10:05 AM
5

She was clearly not receptive of that joke either.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 09:38 PM
12

Well no shit, that's not really the problem is it? The problem is the standard of behaviour they selectively hold the men to, and whether they actually uphold them in their behaviour as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 09:36 PM
2

Well, words have meanings. Either rape is traumatic or not, either it leaves marks or not. He is implying it does not, therefor he automatically is implying they are not traumatic. Not my fault, he chose his rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 10:40 PM
2

Read again until you understand. The answer depends on whether or not you claim to have a coherent argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 10:35 PM
2

Well, trauma, per definition leaves a lasting mark, so, it depends, if you think your statement makes logical sense, then yes, you would have to also agree that rape is not traumatic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 09:32 PM
2

Are you saying rape is not a traumatic event?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 09:15 PM
1

It be like it do!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 11:35 AM
1

/r/badhistory
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/18 02:50 PM
1

yes
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/18 11:33 PM
1

Right, and I don't see why he shouldn't be able to find a short boring slim educated and fit woman. If he can find them in Poland then he's right, the market is bad in NL.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/18 02:09 PM
1

Bullshit There is range in terms of who can get what, and there is range in terms of equivalence. If a fit educated man can't find a fit educated woman, then that's a problem. If all women were fat and all men were athletes, then yes, a relative 10 would still get a relative 10, but on an absolute scale that 10 is shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/18 01:41 PM
1

Now imagine retiring with a person that wasn't a fat slob their whole life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/18 01:38 PM
1

acts like they are so below doctors. What is it with people on this site obsessing about acting like there is no hierarchy. Puting 'so' in there makes it a completely meaningless statement, but no, nurses are in fact below doctors. In educating, pay, and social status.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/18 05:44 PM
1

Why would that make trp better suited for it's ends?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/18 09:20 AM
1

However, simply being able to afford the transgressions is not sexy. So you're saying having money is sexy, not being able to spend it. ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/18 02:33 PM
4

Yet here you guys are, freely voicing your objection among many others. The other side has a voice? It must be the territorium of the other side!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 07:36 AM
0

By using absolutes and bad definitions, they eroded public comprehension of the issues being discussed I think they made it very clear what was being discussed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/18 07:33 AM
1

Are you really going to be happier if you cannot ever afford anything apart from necessities?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 03:55 PM
1

an programmer then. 79k. Not even six figures. just double though
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 03:44 PM
1

Doesn't change anything about what he said
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/18 07:45 AM
2

No you aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/18 07:44 AM
2

I know at least one guy. He does weights and calisthenics. Crazy chest circumference and damn lean. Definitely not on gear, but also no extreme definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/18 06:50 PM
1

Right guys who post on Twitter about that already are sample biased for idiocy
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/18 06:41 PM
1

Not true
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/18 06:34 PM
1

Do women really think men are so retarded to not see the difference between a face that has foundation and a normal face? You know men have faces too right?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/18 06:29 PM
1

jesus fucking christ you have the memory of a flea
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 11:04 PM
1

I don't need to. It's already defined, and since you clearly didn't understand my demonstration using set logic there is no point pretending you will make any progress.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 09:32 PM
1

You have not asked a question that demonstrates you understood the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 09:16 PM
1

And you thinking your question has any relevance is funny, considering I just told you why the premise of your question is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 08:08 PM
1

I speak at least 2 more languages than you do. And I understand basic logic in all of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 07:51 PM
1

I think you need to take Logic 101. A={B,C}, i am talking about A, and pointing out how B is possible is not good enough when C is not possible. You need B and C for A.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 06:23 PM
1

right, and you don't get to define which definition others are using, and therefore it is wrong to claim that you can have a harem, if you cannot have one that functions in the way that is meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 05:47 PM
1

harems contained multiple wives of men. Not always but often. If you can't have multiple wives you can't have the full function of a harem.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 05:42 PM
1

that spouse is bestowed with many legal and financial benefits by the state, You're ignoring the pivotal point here. Which is that those things aren't just some side issue, but one of the main issues of marriage. And your continued bad history concerning the cultural institutions doesn't change that. There were certain cultural expectations tied to marriage even in harems, that cannot be enforced in the system we use today. Hugh Hefner also can afford an attorney to set up complex contracts to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 02:36 PM
1

Did you just not understand what i wrote or did you choose to ignore it in favour of making an easier argument possible? I am not, in any way, relying for my own argument on the quote I posted. The harems existed in societies where a legal framework didn't even exist in that sense. Instead of socially enforced rules we rely on legal ones instead today, it is irrelevant that they didn't have laws like that then, because we do today, and those very laws do not allow for harems in any way similar t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 01:44 PM
1

True, but you have to see it in the context i sent it. The way I used the word is according to a normal usage of it. Then the other poster decided that he could arbitrarily restrict the word to a specific meaning, upon which I replied with a quote that showed that at the very least his restrictive definition is incorrect. I didn't post that quote as a way to claim I was using it in that way. I was attacking his argument rather than supporting mine. If you look up the word 'harem' you will find t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 12:55 PM
2

That makes literally no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 10:43 AM
1

Because they are more subjective than the others.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 10:41 AM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 09:25 PM
1

No and neither is that a witty thing to ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 09:02 PM
1

Tell me more about how you know the real meaning i had in mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 09:01 PM
0

(in former times) the separate part of a Muslim household reserved for wives, concubines, and female servants. SAD
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 12:50 PM
1

harem TLDR you don't know what harem means.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 12:38 PM
1

The fact that there are laws against having multiple wives, and in countries where these laws don't exist, men have multiple wives, shows you are full of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 12:03 PM
1

what restrictions against harems? he just can't legally marry them
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 10:46 AM
-2

Stop living in fantasy land. Who's talking about war?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 10:45 AM
1

Okay well you do have a point - it is true that men's behavior helped foster women to be like this. That's some "original sin" type bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 10:44 AM
1

Clearly
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 04:22 PM
1

Reaching new intellectual heights are we?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 04:02 PM
1

lmao, no. but nice argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 03:22 PM
1

Right back attcha. Where is your proof, that prostitution, a behaviour observed among most if not all cultures and several animal species, where is your proof, that this is not something that happened before whatever arbitrary pont in time you chose?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 03:12 PM
1

uuuh, i hate to blow your mind, but i would probably have a positive win rate on all of those. Can you tell with 100% certainty everytime? of course not. Can you be correct more often than if they were indistinguishable? of fucking course you can.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 02:53 PM
2

It's also not not true because you think it is ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 02:12 PM
1

Was that an attempt at a sentence?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 10:37 AM
0

Except he said dont be yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 09:46 AM
1

Actually yes
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 09:41 AM
1

It's unnecessarily wordy, but it is intelligible.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 04:18 PM
1

Hes asking why bitches be hatin
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 03:48 PM
1

Define the word child
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 07:21 AM
3

If you wanted to describe gender trends, you'd be correct in taking these trends into account. Seems pretty meaningful to me. Not everything has to be about individual expression.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 10:58 AM
1

Few people deny that there's a difference in averages, but that the variation within a gender is great enough to render that mostly meaningless. The study isn't, but youre overvlown conclusion is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 09:28 AM
5

If there is a naturally occurring phenomenon that leads a societal meme such as the age gap, then you would also not be able to test for these things in isolation. So as is, your explanation requires more complex processes and as such requires more proof. It is not reasonable to assume the more complicated answer is the correct one. Your brother is not as similar to you genetically as you think. First: the supposed small difference in genetic expression between genders is a meaningless statement…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 08:20 AM
1

That's a handwaving
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 08:14 AM
2

The standards don't change enough from individual to individual to allow for that to make sense. If it's a standard, then it's something most people would find good, otherwise it would just be a preference. If most women have a standard that excludes most men, then no, that is in fact not realistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/18 10:21 AM
2

So your comment came after /u/midnight2196 but for some reason it ignores his.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/18 09:06 PM
1

Thats kind of irrelevant. We are all individuals. There are just as many men surrounding a man than there are men surrounding a woman. How often have you been the victim of random unprompted violent assault? I have been four times. In the last 3 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/18 07:00 AM
1

sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/18 05:46 PM
1

Zeitgeist
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/18 07:27 AM
1

What do you expect from someone who's username is modelled after one of the dumbest conspiracy videos on the net.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/18 11:10 PM
1

Women go home with him everyday everywhere, because none of this is visibible.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/18 11:08 PM
1

I know
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/18 05:33 PM
1

Stop pointing out factors that make my argument seem oversimplified! niaeh!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/18 03:24 PM
1

Not sure if sarcasm, or just a lack of understanding of what class means.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 08:10 PM
1

Why do rich people have money, even though poor people don't approve?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 08:05 PM
2

speaking of cringe, that's something I do when people reply with some general attempt at wit, instead of responding to a good argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 08:03 PM
2

Your post also assumes that the women were conscious of the strategy being performed on her, and you willingly misinterpreted what he said as to mean: she likes it being done to her, rather than the far more logical case being: the behaviour works.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 07:51 PM
1

Understand RP ideas "Know of" is the only necessary and verifiable standard that should be relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/18 11:23 AM
1

Sexless marriages aren't really something you see in people's 20s a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/18 12:00 PM
1

Yeah, but it's not like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/18 12:43 PM
1

Yeah and they are dishonest with themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/18 10:54 AM
1

willing to reach. I mean if you're not willing to be honest to yourself, then you most certainly can't be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/18 10:03 AM
1

You're just repeating the point, that if she didn't know it, it's not dishonesty. I disagree. When you say to a person,"hey be honest". You don't mean, just double down on your beliefs. We mean, reflect, and go deeper. If you don't know what you're into, then you aren't honest enough with yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/18 09:28 AM
0

If you can't be honest with yourself, you can't be honest with others.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/18 09:18 AM
1

honest is she though? is she being honest with herself?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/18 09:17 AM
2

The definition of the word middle class isn't set in stone, it's rather a wishy washy term. You guys already made your points very clear, and bickering over the question of whether or not the middle class had maids at that time will not be productive considering it just hinges on the definition of middle class you are thinking off.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/18 12:08 AM
1

Leaves it up to the question of what middle class is, and because it's a shaky definition you guys should probably just leave it at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 11:59 PM
1

I have said it before, and I'll say it again. If you can't be honest with yourself, you can't be honest with others. So, yeah, she was dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 10:47 PM
1

What do your two sentences have to do with each othter?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 08:25 PM
1

You didn't address the point about his wife not being honest about her preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/18 08:12 PM
1

When I say people aren't honest to themselves, I am talking about these things people aren't conscious off, because they don't reflect on this exact dichotomy between action and reason. I didn't mean dishonest in the way of a conscious lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 01:44 PM
1

oh, in that case, i don't think they are related.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 08:19 AM
1

That's a mean thing to make fun about. So is male baldness, but female hair loss is culturally even worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 01:04 AM
2

Men have a general preference for women of a certain age no matter their age.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 01:01 AM
1

You just don't understand, mom! This is who I am. It's nuanced!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 12:59 AM
1

those men are fashion hobbyists, they're trying to look stylish (to each other and to people who "get it"). so no they don't look good (to normal people).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 12:57 AM
1

I'd more say: Self reporting vs blackbox If there was a redpill theory for women targeting men, then it would be the same way. Self reporting is unreliable, because people aren't even honest to themselves, how can they be honest to others.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 12:51 AM
1

Copout
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/18 09:20 AM
5

I think socializing with men should be step one, and then the lifting and team sports as step two, and shortly after talking with women more. First is to break the social retardation trap, second is to build a strong mind and body, the third to refine a blunt character.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 04:04 PM
1

With that weight you could both be buff or chubby. So well have to take your word for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/18 05:44 AM
1

5cm <= 5cm+
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/18 03:02 PM
2

Why would you want a person that has a flawed psyche? Now, I have my flaws myself, of course, more than many probably, but I like people despite flaws, not because of them. You are speaking out in preference though, so the bar for justifying it should be higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/18 02:57 PM
1

It's the very definition of what people mean when they say they don't want drama.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/18 02:55 PM
4

Because it's running circles, it's digging a hole and filling it up again, it's carrying dead weight. It may feel like it's exciting to you, but it's not, it's the most boring thing I could imagine. What is exciting about tracking down the well trodden path of dysfunctional relationships? There's nothing exciting about people who can't make their mind up about what they want. You know what's exciting? Space rockets.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/18 02:54 PM
5

Wow. Reading this, even though I knew people like this existed, I think reading this will help me be at ease in the future. This is everything I want to avoid in life, and knowing that's exactly what some people want just makes it easier to be more decisive in not vying for the grass on the other side.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/18 02:24 PM
1

It can be pretty gross how random women will tell you they want mixed babies, or will touch your hair, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 02:15 PM
1

Mind PM me a list of top certifications to get? Thanks for the effort in advance.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 08:24 AM
1

Well, that's their pejorative.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 08:18 AM
1

Clearly you've never been a foreign man in Asia.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 07:13 AM
1

Sure but when it's a white scot who does it's something else. I see the pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 11:42 PM
1

It's not the same because the sexes are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 06:20 PM
1

How to differentiate?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 06:07 PM
2

"it's different because it affects me" reasoning strikes again
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 06:06 PM
2

Asking for a proper reasoning however is not. Just saying it's my right to be offended does not mean that I then have a good reason to care.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 05:48 PM
0

Feel free to educate the masses.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 05:43 PM
2

It means deceiving people is unethical.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 05:13 AM
1

Well the ball is in your park, so do what you will.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 04:34 AM
2

No it's a thought concept that is clearly understood as how he means it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 04:30 AM
1

You not understanding me and me not making sense are not the same, sorry. What's it you're having trouble understanding? I laid out the difference between atheism and satanism in how it relates to the main stream christian ideology, as an analogy to how incels and RPs relate to the BP mainstream. Also, to try to put a label such as statism on something such as incel is just ridiculous, they are a bunch of contradictory nutjobs, there is no real ideology there. Some advocate for state distributed…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 04:28 AM
1

What? Non sequitur not processed. The analogy does not rely on those belief structures to be common, and atheism is a common belief structure, lmao, what are you on about?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 04:15 AM
1

Atheists believe Christianity is a lie, and thus discover a new way of thinking about everything ie. they discover the actual rules to the world and life are different than what they were taught. Satanists are just reeeing and can't figure out how to actually progress from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 04:09 AM
1

No that's not what anybody said, that's just what you read into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 04:05 AM
2

The logic being, you are recognizing the rules of the game so you start playing by them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 03:56 AM
1

Yes and RP and Incel are different like Atheism and Satanism.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 03:54 AM
2

Yes because clearly men aren't able to tell the difference between handicapped and fatigued women tripping and stumbling into them to normal flirting interactions by women. Clearly it is the men who are dense here...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 03:54 AM
1

So Bluepill and Redpill are couched in the same belief structure?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 03:43 AM
2

That is a very ridiculous scenarios as well. All those women falling into guys arms because of DOMS.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 03:42 AM
2

so fundamentally different, got it
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 03:41 AM
3

And how common is that mate?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 03:07 AM
1

incel is not rp though
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/18 03:06 AM
2

This was the best sales pitch for RP I've ever seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 05:09 PM
1

But you have not made any arguments yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 05:05 PM
0

Isn't bluepill the statism of dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 04:59 PM
6

There you go guys, if a woman brushes up against your arm often, don't take it as sign of interest, she might just be disabled!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 04:55 PM
1

chicken egg dilemma
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 12:42 AM
1

Imagine being a cheese pizza enthusiast.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/18 12:10 AM
1

did he though
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 07:14 AM
1

Did too
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 07:14 AM
3

You are disputing the fact that religion is good at promising a better afterlife, yeah, makes no sense, but yeah. It's not like religion is really good at finding new members among the poor and down troddent, and manages to convince them to do idiotic things. nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 07:03 AM
1

You did not. Yes is did.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 06:52 AM
1

It's a fact, so his personal disposition really does not come into that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 06:50 AM
1

You're probably the type of person that get's upset at the use of "adult language", putting form over function. You not liking the form of the argument does really not matter at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 06:46 AM
1

Attacking someone is a shit argument, Also, what a total load of shit. Attacking someone's argument, which I very much did, is a perfectly good argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 06:44 AM
1

Attacking someone is a shit argument Well..
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 06:41 AM
1

Then I pitty you. Like just admit you were being snarky.... The tone of an arugment does not implicate whether it is an argument or not. There is nothing to admit, because my comment being snarky does not mean that it wasn't also an argument. I pitty the people who have to argue with you then, because there is some severe communication breakdown holding you back.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 06:36 AM
1

The tone of an arugment does not implicate whether it is an argument or not. Oh, I see, you want to pretend that making a snarky comment that very clearly implies a specific complaint, is not in fact making that complaint, because you didn't undersand it. That is funny. Have fun not wanting to undersand implications. Have fun pretending that implications are not a valid and abundant tool used everyday by everyone in every context of communication.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 06:30 AM
1

I don't think your reading comprehension is abyssmal, i think you are refusing to see the argument I am making. because you don't want to accept it as an argument. Calls into question what an argument is to you. How is what exactly an argument? And an argument concerning what? I made an argument concerning the quality of his claim. That is how it is an argument. In that it is. There is no further breakdown of explanation possible here, which is why I point towards you to make an effort in unders…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 06:25 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/8h9u42/isnt_the_use_of_the_word_toxic_masculinity/dyiy91e/?st=jgufjcwv&sh=1671fe87
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 06:22 AM
1

Pretend all you want. It's you running away from reading and trying to understand. If you don't understand that claims made without support is invalid, and then don't understand that saying that is an arugment that undermindes those claims, then that is very much an issue on your side of the comprehension divide, not on mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 06:16 AM
1

I explained my argument. Your inability to comprehend is not my battle to fight. Goodbye.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 06:13 AM
2

What I said in the first comment implies what I said in the second. If you don't see how straight up criticism of how a person comes to their beliefs is an argument concerning the validity of those beliefs, I don't know what to tell you. Anyways, right back at ya, how is what you are saying an argument? My point is completely obvious, and your question is completely redundant.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 06:06 AM
5

How is just throwing out random numbers, qualifying them with 'i believe', based on nothing but willy nilly personal bias an argument? ergo, i didn't realize this was church and beliefs matter. Now, 99% of discussion here is not proven with studies or whatever, but this guy is using language that implies he is making science based statements, all the while not basing his statements on science. He even puts the carriage in front of the horse by saying science might sway his opinion, instead of lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 04:52 AM
3

Didn't realize this was church
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 03:10 AM
2

RP can mean roleplay in different contexts.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 12:50 PM
3

Dude, last weekend I visited a friend in another city in the hopes of sex, which turned out well, but the whole trip and weekend activities with her cost me more than I ever paid for a pro.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 03:54 AM
4

Let's just realize she is also using the modern newspeak definition of rape where just getting drunk with a chick and then seducing her is rape if she might regret it later.
/r/PussyPass03/05/18 10:51 AM
7

Normal for crazy fads.
/r/MGTOW17/03/18 03:45 PM
1

People who act like personal preferences cant possibly be argued for or against irk me. Lack of Introspection.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 03:54 AM
0

Your view is really only a statement. There is no actually view to discuss.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/18 01:08 PM
2

You don't know that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/18 03:35 PM
3

I think you missed the mark a bit in the last sentences. Average men back then couldn't match top men back then, but because of early marriage and monogamy the women had to take the man they could get. If everyone is single, all women can have the best men for a night or two.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 04:35 PM
1

Professional one on one meetings were the business partner in question is opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 06:26 AM
1

Friendships aren't all that great anyway. They are nice, but ending one because a higher stakes game didn't play out is hardly a big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/18 06:29 AM
0

Because women want sex from different men. Why do you claim to know things about cars when you are not a car?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/18 06:21 AM
1

Unfortunately I am not a lawyer and cannot list you all the legally set terms of a marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 05:50 AM
1

The marriage license is merely licensing the states acknowledgement of the contract of marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 04:45 AM
1

I don't see what you are actually saying. Yes, it has changed. And that's one of the reasons the old contract doesn't work that well anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 03:26 AM
2

nope, still sounds insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 03:23 AM
1

There's no contract? What do you call an agreement between two people that has legal consequences?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 03:15 AM
1

Depends on what you mean by care. But yeah, networking is important.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 03:08 AM
1

Not how airport names work.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 05:24 PM
1

Do you think other men care that a woman has a high value husband? NO. Do other men care that a woman is a good hostess? NO. Do other men care that a woman has a network of other high value women? NO. Completely wrong. They just care about these things for fundamentally different reasons. All these things change how the man sees his relationship to that woman, and what value she has to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 05:18 PM
1

Yeah, I know. I'm only able to give this perspective because I don't feel myself weighed down by such thoughts as much anymore. Cool of you to be so supportive though. Didn't actually want to imply I was an incel in my first post, because I am not, but mentally I was very close for a long time, and still have a lot of negative thought patterns.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 05:05 PM
1

I was joking because you meant to say blame increased sex trafficking on legalised prostitution
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 04:55 PM
1

blame legalised prostitution on increased sex trafficking. Well only after it is legalized.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 04:25 PM
2

I'm not actually an incel, but I am not wildly succesful either. Depressed more likely. Anyways, I think the problem is that when there are years or decades of no success, every chance seems like it might be the one and only. Which leads to more desperation and self sabotage, making it selffulfilling prophecy. Like with depression in general it's a hard cycle to get out off, especially when no one is there to encourage you, but even then.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 04:19 PM
1

That's possible, but that's kind of like asking why someone is acting retarded even though they aren't. "Maybe they want people to think they have downs syndrome." Yeah, maybe...I'm not in their head, but I know how it looks. Also, if he wants that why is he going on a first date? Buy a prostitute.....well rent a prostitute. I don't think that is equivalent to wanting to live out a fantasy of 'just sex on my terms'.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 03:37 PM
2

Because if you are stuck in incel mentality, you feel you are not good enough for the world. And when you try to better yourself, there are phases where you feel better, but the fear of peaking and reversing is real. So the fear of not being good enough continues, even if possible successes are on the horizon. What if I finally manage to seduce a woman for her to then reject my sexual abilities? When you have been hiding from the world for so long, you don't want your first attempts at going out…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 03:31 PM
1

I'm not saying he can't be sexual in his bedroom, but he might want to do it in a way that isn't cringe worthy. Again with the quality assesment that has nothing to do with the question of whether it is wrong in concept. Maybe he just wanted simple sex, and thought he could get it. Maybe he wanted to have a very direct sexual encounter, and not be suave. It doesn't matter. Lewdness is not when you initiate sex in a direct manner, in a place and time when sex is usually initiated in whatever mann…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 03:10 PM
2

Lewd means being sexually offensive. Unless you are sayin Aziz shouldn't be sexual in his own bedroom, then it seems you are merely criticising his supposed lack of finesse. If your own bedroom isn't the place to be sexually open, I don't know what place is.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 02:39 PM
4

She wanted to be romantically seduced, and when that didn't happen, she got upset.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 12:17 PM
1

you're inviting a douche nozzle to act like a douche. I don't see what is douchey about wanting to hook up and making that clear. He didn't lewdly come onto her or anything. You're slutshaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 12:16 PM
5

That's on her not on him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/18 11:52 AM
3

It says charged...
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/18 12:50 PM
1

Source.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/18 12:38 PM
16

Basic Chinese bitch is called Green Tea Bitch in Chinese. No joke.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/18 12:32 PM
1

|<.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/18 05:56 AM
1

Oh yeah I have that holding conversation definitely. 250+ matches, but can't keep up the interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 05:46 PM
1

Oh damn
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/17 05:07 PM
97

Because its important to clear his image.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/17 12:40 PM
1

No it wasnt. She was obviously very kinky, she just didnt want actually say what she liked.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 04:49 AM
1

Tips fedora
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/17 04:48 AM
3

Is that why your smile is gone?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/17 02:24 PM
3

What'samatter you stopped smiling :)
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/17 01:51 PM
1

I'm not the person you had your little rage issue with. I'm just a third party looking in from the outside.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/17 01:34 PM
1

nerdrage combined with forced wanting to seem condescending fake friendly smileys are pretty universal.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/17 01:12 PM
1

Ooh, i can really feel the embarassed anger you felt as you typed these last few posts.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/17 05:51 AM
8

Had a girl once ask me what I liked. I was a bit stumped and stupidly answerd, uuuh regular sex? Well she said she found that boring and liked a bit more kinky, and when upon further prodding she revealed: But not hitting or slapping, and no slapping on the ass either, and don't touch my ass I don't like that, also I don't like blowjobs. At that point I was just wondering, is it so hard to say what you do in fact like? I did not initiate sex.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/17 05:48 AM
54

Yeah his outfits aren't even on fleek. smh I do not find how I dress to be very important and look down on people who do Yeah, well I bet you do not even dress well! Got 'em!
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/17 05:27 AM
1

Which is why I said I didn't want to argue your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:46 AM
1

Cheating only implies that the person speaking thinks it's not permissible.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 01:49 AM
0

Not that I really want to argue this point You are seriously unimaginative. Ever heard of open relationships? Unless you are prescribing your morals on them, I don't see how you get to call people in these relationships illoyal, for doing things they communally agreed on.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 01:30 AM
0

Not that I really want to argue this point, but it's not hard conflict. Loyalty doesn't automatically mean fidelity, in that sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 12:20 PM
2

He was using himself as a confirmation of the concept, that males, barring other factors, would in fact mate with most of their female aquaintances.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 12:13 PM
2

All the time. Ooh, moms have the toughest job in the world, bleurgh. You never hear, wow poor him, he has to work so hard, you always hear, wow poor her, he's always at work, never at home to help out, take care of the kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 12:09 PM
2

Why are you talking about dignity, when he is talking about facts? How is him stating that every man has these feelings a matter of dignity? Your comment amounts to: Don't mention this reality, because bla.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 12:03 PM
4

No he's comparing the logic, which you obviously lack.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 11:58 AM
2

If they take it as 'go away' then where's the problem? They obviously had it on their mind then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 11:57 AM
1

Normie is a meme name for normal people, a normie meme is a meme only average boring people find funny. Usually it's a meme that's already long dead. Things like Harlem Shake, was a meme for a week maybe, was a normie meme for years after. My brother probably has never heard or read 'normie meme', but he implicitly alluded to the concept by complaining about some kids in his school dabbing like no tomorrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 02:59 PM
0

I just wanted to mention that my fifteen year old brother has complained about how dumb teenage meme culture is. (specifically about dabbing and it's apparent evolutions) Just found it amusing that a fifteen year old would complain about normie memes without knowing of the concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 01:30 PM
3

Sorry, didn't realize we were discussing legality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 01:27 PM
2

Toxic mothers will be the one stamping down hardest.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 01:21 PM
1

Women reward aggressive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 01:12 PM
3

It's not hard data when the data is gathered by asking people their opinions. It doesn't show anything about actual behaviour. So, soft data.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 12:56 PM
1

Because the illusion doesn't hold up.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 12:47 PM
4

But she is hardly dateable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 12:38 PM
8

Argument ad absurdum.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 12:32 PM
1

Define hate speech.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 12:31 PM
1

What a stupid fucking point to make. Realy. Such a childish piece of logic. I don't like X. Here is why: ....+ OOOOh why are you talking about X so much? Ooooooh. Genius tier logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 12:28 PM
4

supply ... chains.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 09:54 PM
3

Maybe you're not the intended audience.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 09:29 AM
1

Having eyebrows?
/r/PussyPass16/08/17 09:54 AM
1

Ah, I now understand. This is purely attraction based though, right? Not general standing?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:12 PM
1

of course women ended up with less desirable guys, but that's not how it was determined in the paper. This is the step that I'm missing. The paper says... what? That they date beneath them? By what metric. rating or ranking?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 12:25 PM
1

His claim: Women view men as less attractive. (as seen by 80% being below average) Your response: Women actually are more likely to date beneath them. But this concept of 'beneath' them equates to the first claim exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:12 AM
1

So then the study doesn't actually contradict his claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 06:59 AM
1

That's not a normal distribution though. Unless you are saying the categories are extremely weirdly chosen.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 06:17 AM
11

In these patriarchal societies, women's sexuality was more oppressed than that of men. Why? We know for sure, men did it because they were able, and because it benefitted men Swing and miss. Stable societies are able to survive. Sexual repression is needed to reduce conflict due to competition within society. If monogamy is enforced on a social level, it reduces the amount of risk through competition. Making women a commodity that can only be accessed through playing by the rules forces men to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 06:06 AM
1

That doesn't answer the question. Desireability in terms of a ranking, or a score based on interaction? Is it a list, or a distribution?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 05:49 AM
2

Yes, but his correction didn't make the point clearer, it obscured it.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 05:43 PM
-3

Pretty clear you didn't see my point.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 01:03 PM
1

No the point was if they want to see a film about women in WW2 then why don't (those) women make a film about women in WW2.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 10:45 AM
1

Only thing I have issues with.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/17 09:36 AM
22

secondary sexual organs. now laugh.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/17 10:30 PM
9

Well I think something is wrong with you. You're saying a, as we now definitely know, without a doubt, innocent kid deserved to be in jail because they touched the breasts of a person four years their minor. That's fucked up.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/17 01:11 AM
2

I'm a man and keep the seat down, because I clean my own toilet and don't want to touch my own piss more than necessary. Meaning I sit down while peeing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/17 11:35 AM
1

It's still not skilled labour by any definition of the word. You're reaching hard.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 02:34 PM
1

I am referring to your apparent claim that women earn less in the same jobs due to gender discrimination not due to negotiation problems. That's quite the claim and would require quite the proof.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 12:11 PM
1

DAE wonder why?? This does not allow you to jump to a conclusion. Supply and demand is a much better explanation.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 10:47 AM
1

I'd like to see a source for your claim as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 10:46 AM
11

You don't quite seem to understand the difference between academic positions and industry.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:51 AM
2

Lol wat?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter