TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

builtbro Archive

View 21 posts and 259 comments by builtbro on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
444

builtbro/r/MensRights05/08/12 02:43 AM
337

builtbro/r/MensRights06/10/12 06:58 AM
137

builtbro/r/MensRights17/08/12 10:08 AM
83

builtbro/r/MensRights30/09/12 12:25 PM
73

builtbro/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:36 PM
65

builtbro/r/MensRights28/09/12 06:19 PM
41

builtbro/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:05 AM
38

builtbro/r/MensRights23/08/12 10:11 AM
37

builtbro/r/MensRights14/09/12 03:32 AM
35

builtbro/r/MensRights28/09/12 07:26 AM
32

builtbro/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:31 PM
23

builtbro/r/MensRights16/09/12 01:25 PM
21

builtbro/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:16 AM
15

builtbro/r/MensRights13/08/12 12:58 AM
15

builtbro/r/MensRights01/09/12 05:57 PM
8

builtbro/r/MensRights09/08/12 06:39 PM
5

builtbro/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:34 AM
4

builtbro/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:09 AM
2

builtbro/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:48 AM
1

builtbro/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:55 AM
0

builtbro/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:09 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Is it known, definitively, that VA was exposed as a result of his own careless stupidity with personal information, rather than someone divulging his IP, as was being reported on other stories about him? I suspect the former merely as it's more likely but have never seen evidence either way.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 10:46 PM
19

TIL the word "privacy" now means whatever feminists want it to mean in order to best suit their ideology's goals.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 10:32 PM
14

It isn't "bitching" to complain about links to stories in one of the trashiest and most duplicitous tabloid rags on the planet and ask for either a link to a more reputable source or a secondary source. It's prudent. This is a publication that hypes fear over HPV vaccines and was integral in stoking the Andrew Wakefield fueled fires of unfounded fear over the MMR vaccine that lead to measles rates in the UK skyrocketing over the last decade. Not to mention their notorious perpetual pedophile pan…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 10:13 PM
18

Even though I'm a gay dude, I was planning on going out tonight to rape a few women walking home alone, you know, because I'm a man and we do that for the lulz sometimes. Thank god I saw this before going out. Thanks to FSU, now I know better and definitely won't be raping anyone tonight.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:01 AM
2

PZ Morons left sanity behind long ago. Even Sam Harris wrote a piece calling him out as the douchebag troll that he is after he got sick of his bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:54 AM
5

The porn. Oh the glorious glorious loads of porn. That's why I use it anyway.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:40 AM
3

Lol. aka, how to be crazy neurotic bitch about sex.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:33 AM
4

Ya think we can do this without calling each other niggers and faggots? We're not on xbox live here and most of us left junior high a long time ago.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:08 AM
29

Honestly what the fuck is Karen wasting her time on Reddit, a blog, and youtube for exactly? SHE NEEDS TO WRITE A BOOK. She's easily one of the most intelligent commentators in her area and must have book deals constantly being thrown at her. Do have any idea how big a seller a book she wrote would end up being? It would be fucking huge. We're talking like, Camille Paglia Vamps and Tramps huge, at least. It's not like she'd even have to pad the content either; the youtube material alone that she…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 02:44 AM
12

Christ, he's fuckin' stunning.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 09:30 AM
11

I can't see how this could even be remotely related to men's rights.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 08:56 AM
1

That made me happy.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 10:45 AM
0

Should a man who destroys another's sight in a violent attack have his own eyes surgically removed as punishment? I don't want to live in that world.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:18 AM
1

Seems like a bit of a dummy. The female bitch equivalent of a male PUA douche. I wonder how many of the "bad boys" she's so eager to moisten her panties over have greater than double digit IQs. Not too many I'd guess. The reason women marry "dorks" as she derisively puts it, is because high intelligence in males often equates to fiduciary stability and at the extreme end, even high political power. Advantageous characteristics to have in terms of long term familial reproductive success. Anyway, …
/r/MensRights10/10/12 09:34 AM
2

Are you serious right now? I mean are you fucking kidding me, or are you actually making the argument that forced abortion exists anywhere within the universe of sane ethical debate? I'm asking honestly. We're genuinely encroaching on "whether slavery can be moral" territory here. This is obscene. Bodily integrity of a person of either sex isn't magically up for debate because they've committed a crime. This should not need explaining.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:56 PM
3

B cannot be up for debate. The idea that one person can potentially force another to undergo an extremely invasive medical procedure is repugnant on the face of it.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:34 PM
1

Well, A is wrong, B is right.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 09:17 AM
1

Think of how much easier it is for you to make this argument as a girl than it is for me in the same situation as a guy. I have the added "why do you care so much about our baby's penis!?" insinuations/suspicions of creepyness to deal with. Of course, it's not that at all, obviously. It's that I KNOW personally of the problems it can cause and don't want him to suffer the same totally unnecessary issues. I still don't know how I'm going to bring up the topic before she's due in a couple months. …
/r/MensRights09/10/12 04:20 AM
6

*K
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:35 AM
9

I'm actually not really worried about it anymore. The Secular Coalition isn't really part of the skeptic community, they're mostly atheist oriented. They're welcome to vitiate their movement with the bigotries of feminism all they want for all I care. Skepticism is what's important to me. I really was worried a while ago that they would totally infect the skeptic community and ruin it, but in the last 6 months they've gone so full retard with their constant hyperbolic hysterics and atheism + gar…
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:19 AM
139

"Gender doesn't exist! It's just, like, a social construct!" "OMG get that perverted man out of here! This is a bio-wymyin only safe space!" I'll take feminist fucktarded phrases for $800, Alex. E: and "bio-women"? Seriously? That's some funny shit.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 12:02 AM
1

Naomi Wolf is a fucking retard and a misandric bigot. All the recent horseshit directed at straight men saying "oh noes, so much porn use among men is giving them unrealistic expectations and leaving women unsatisfied!" is moronic, pop-psych claptrap that's merely the newest way society and feminists have hit upon to make straight men feel ashamed and doubt filled about their sexuality. Stop buying into this pseudoscientific bullshit. Do you have any fucking idea how much porn gay men watch? Wel…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 09:48 AM
8

Swype allows me to type vastly more efficiently and quickly than I ever could by pecking out each individual letter. It's much more important to me that I can express my thoughts cogently and efficiently than it is that I express them with flawless spelling and immaculate grammar. Clarity and accuracy of language are important, but the expression of ideas and logical argument, moreso.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 12:03 PM
8

Lol, wow. Uh, I'm fully aware of the difference between "loose" and "lose". And while we may indeed live in an era where clear English communication is more important than ever, we also live in an era where we thumb our thoughts into a 4 inch square that attempts to "automatically correct" the spelling of words, sometimes wrongly, or speak our thoughts into a machine that transcribes our voice, usually not understanding homophones. Sometimes I catch the errors my machine helpers make, sometimes …
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:41 AM
75

Deierederirdre's totally right, first think of the hundred thousand dollars you will loose paying child support to a lying bitch that cheated on you and a child that isn't yours, then spend the extra cash on the Cadillac of DNA sequence tests to be absolutely sure.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 04:45 AM
3

I'm not holding my breath, lol. Mainstream America likes shaved, waxed, primped, coiffed, plain, non-threatening, swimmer's build 22 year olds. I, otoh, like REAL. What are your reasons?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 12:59 AM
1

I know, I'm that 15%.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 12:38 AM
5

Eh. Do women still like that waxed to oblivion baby dolphin look? I thought it went out years ago, but it's filmed in California I guess. I need some fur. I'll start watching tpir when they start hiring guys like this.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 11:19 PM
6

Go flick yourself off to this kind of delusional victim cult shit somewhere else.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:08 PM
4

You mean that narrative that exists almost nowhere outside of Riyadh and feminists' fevered imaginations? That one?
/r/MensRights06/10/12 03:43 PM
9

Maybe if you read the details.... You don't get to randomly kill people who wronged you in some way who knows how long ago. That's called vigilantism and we kind of have laws against it for good reason. If these women did what they did out of actual self-defense, they wouldn't be in prison at all.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 03:12 PM
3

Are you fucking drunk?
/r/MensRights06/10/12 03:01 PM
20

It seems to me like you're the lamest troll this sub has ever seen.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:43 AM
80

Naturally the entire comment section is top to bottom misandry and robotic, unquestioning acceptance of the women's justifications for murder. Never mind the fact that if the killings they committed actually HAD truly been in self defense they likely wouldn't even be in jail at all right now. No matter, it's only men who are dead, so the hearsay testimony of their female murderers today is sufficient to convict them from beyond the grave. Funny how NPR and the like never run sob stories on the p…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:11 AM
5

Fuck you, you don't anything about their personal life.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:37 PM
0

Your posting history indicates you are in serious need of a life.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:47 AM
1

I intended it to be disparaging. He's making the claim that 90% of rapes are unreported, I'm saying that figure is laughable and invented without the slightest bit of rigor or objective evidence to support it.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 11:46 AM
-7

brave level: SO
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:12 PM
2

I see no egregious errors of grammar or syntax in my writing. I suspect it is rather your need for monosyllabic phrasing that is behind your petty sniping.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 10:27 PM
2

I see no egregious errors of grammar or syntax in my writing. I suspect it is rather your need for monosyllabic phrasing that is behind your petty sniping.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 10:25 PM
3

"gender analysis" is a bullshit field just like the post-structural, critical, semiotic, whateverthefuck made up horseshit that academic feminism came out of is. You have no idea how to think properly and have spent your academic career filling your head with subjective political bullshit that has no basis in reality and makes you look like a fucking retard when you actually need to engage people in the real world. Bye.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:20 PM
-4

I'll have a venti hazelnut double cappuccino light foam and no cinnamon, please. ;p
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:14 PM
0

You're throwing so much myside bias at me it's fucking scary. It's understandable, you're a feminist; everything's scary to you.....honey. :) Location accounting for a nearly 2x rape reporting disparity between the UK and US, yeah, that's reaaal likely. You're like the fundamentalist Christian that frantically waves an old rotten piece of wood around claiming it's a piece of the Ark. "It's for realz guise! You can't prove me wrong! Yur gonna go to hell if you don't believe!" Lol. If you actually…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:56 PM
2

It's as much my "job" to explain away the "evidence" for Jesus' purported burial site as it is to explain the disparity in the sort of shit statistics you're putting faith in. YOU'RE the one making the extraordinary claim, honey. The onus is on YOU to bring the goods in a commensurately extraordinary way to support that claim. Of course, you're from the humanities aren't you, so all of this burden of proof, and evidence of falsifiability, and assessment of objectivity, and blinding of study para…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:34 PM
14

And here's another source claiming the unreported rape rate is about fifty percent. Pretty big difference there wouldn't you say? 50%, 90%, you know, it's almost exactly the sort of enormous disparity you'd expect to see if someone were just pulling random numbers out of their ass because the ascertainment of reliable numbers on such a thing is practically impossible. Funny, that.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:07 PM
6

Bad ideas must be fought with good ideas, hate speech must be fought with calls to tolerance, prejudice must be countered with reason. I will never, ever, trust anyone else to decide for me what ideas I may or may not consider, what books I can and cannot read, or what things I am allowed or disallowed to say. The censorious impulse is a powerful one and present in all of us to one degree or another. Yet if we wish to claim to live by the tenets of liberty and freedom of conscience, we must each…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:49 PM
2

Haha, you're MASSIVELY deluded if you think the origins of the MRM owe anything but thanks for comic relief to feminist "theory". You do indeed epitomize the kind of utterly divorced from reality feminist who knows literally nothing about how to question their own blindly accepted dogmas and prejudices though. Typical, for someone invested in a self-indulgent hateful ideology built on casuistry and duplicitous fear mongering.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 01:44 PM
2

Interesting, had no idea there was a national database of such things.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 01:38 PM
8

It sure as shit didn't start in the pseudointellectual halls of "critical theory". That you place the various humanities departments vitiated by said solipsistic pursuits within the realm of "intellectualism", says vastly more about your unfamiliarity with how to think skeptically and rationally than it does about any purported anti-intellectualism on my part. Better luck next time in your ad-hom attacks though hon.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 01:24 PM
8

You so secksy rightsbot. You come back to my place, we have secksy good time. You know you want it baby.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 12:32 PM
5

Lol, you refer to critical analysis as if it were a legitimate area of study, haha, that's adorable. Please fuck back off to your various circleflick feminist subreddits.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:51 AM
1

I see
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:33 AM
6

I don't know why this has no votes. It's a pretty important topic and I was just about to post a link to it myself until I saw it already here. Basically a man was raped to death and now is being laughed at for it. :/
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:28 AM
3

Calm down reddit, I'm joking, Jesus. The post is fawning and completely content-less, I don't actually think it's Elam but come on, if you're going to make a post like this at least make it somewhat more substantive.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:23 AM
-6

Nice try, Paul Elam.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:42 AM
1

Well I disagree completely with your last paragraph as I find him completely uninteresting and borderline conspiratorial, but I'll grant your other objections re traditionalism etc. I muddled that part of my post. Barbarossaa isn't a traditionalist but IS religious as Chapin, who IS traditionalist, and that RmRE guy is seemingly neither but nonetheless wacky.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:39 AM
6

So you're presumably a member of that private sub? I've wanted to see what goes on there for some time, eg. how many members / posts / the type of discussion etc. I think you can quite clearly see from my history that I'm not a troll, can I get an invite?
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:35 AM
4

"they never condemn general society, they always focus on feminists, who out of all groups are probably the best at wanting to strip down gender roles placed on both men and women." Bwahhhaa, wow, hey are you the new act on Thursdays at the Laugh Factory on West 43rd.? You certainly should be. It's interesting how feminists such as yourself invariably go out of your way to interpret terms in the most uncharitable way possible. "Sexual gatekeepers? They must just want to RAPE us!". If I were resp…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 12:36 AM
10

This is pitch perfect and should have many more upvotes. I have had my disagreements with AVfM and JtO individually, but on this topic they, and specifically John, have been wholly in the right; and as a gay dude, I very much appreciate the continued support. /r/mensrights is essentially totally on the right page with respect to this issue largely due, I suspect, to the younger average age of users and very large atheist contingent. Outside of places like this, there are still the occasional big…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:44 PM
5

It's supposed to be blood, but, you know, it's blue so it's filled with whimsy and vim and totally cool!
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:55 PM
2

Barely so, my memory of it is mostly overshadowed by the reams of screeching feminist outrage that accompanied it. And that's my main point here, not that I want to see this kind of thing shut down because "oh my god won't someone think of the children??!", rather I want people to notice the spittle flecked radfem tirades that this sort of video is met with when it's a man committing the violence (never mind that West doesn't actually appear to commit any violence in that video), and when it's a…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:53 PM
8

#whiteflourprivilege / #carbonormativity
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:23 PM
28

Just a follow on really, from her other garbage like I hate boys, whose refrains of "all men are dogs", "boys suck, make me sick, inflated egos, little dicks, use them up, spit them out", and "we would all be happy all be glad, if sweet mama nature never had, all these dirty little boys", etc. etc. But remember, it's only rap artist's misogyny that's truly evil and hateful, and all this sort of nonsense about hating men is all imaginary and not a problem even if it might exist. Incidentally, any…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 08:53 PM
3

Probably. I confess to having a cavalier attitude about such uncouth, dark humor. It tends to creep in when one has contemplated such things themselves in times of great bleakness.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:45 PM
8

If you replaced "women" with "feminists" I could agree with you, as it is however, I cannot. There are many highly intelligent women who don't stand for sexist bigotry of any kind. I know a few personally.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:39 PM
4

Thought this was gonna be a suicide note, lol.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:44 AM
18

The point is that SHE controls monetary matters totally and gives him an allowance.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:42 AM
21

SuicideBanana concern trolling for David Futrelle, sooooooo surprising. Lol
/r/MensRights27/09/12 08:28 PM
1

Are you?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:35 AM
7

This is an obscenity. I always wondered why GWW, JtO, NurdyDancing, typhonblue, etc. are all Canadian and there seems to be so much more going on there than in the US with respect to the MRM. I am slowly beginning to understand now the more I read about things like this in Ontario.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 08:18 PM
7

You're being sardonic, but it seems to me an entirely reasonable question. The latest attacker at York is named Mohammed Hadian. If you immigrate from a culture where this sort of thing apparently borders on being practically de rigueur, it seems fully within the realm of possibility that such an act wouldn't be perceived by the perpetrator as being all together out of the ordinary, or at least not likely to be punished as being such. Obviously that kind of ignorance doesn't excuse the crime, bu…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:37 PM
1

If you read sites like towleroad and see this news on a regular basis, yeah, I think constantly is not too strong a word to use at all. http://newsrescue.com/lesbian-college-student-alexandra-pennel-faked-anti-gay-notes-that-sparked-anti-hate-rally/#axzz27aprPyyQ
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:16 PM
0

Dr. Novella is pretty much my favorite skeptic going right now. I hold him in extremely high esteem. He's the brain of the show, his brothers are the comic relief, Evan is pretty good too, Watson brings that irritating, bitter, jaded special something to the show that it just wouldn't be the same without. Oh, wait, I mean it would be vastly better without.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:46 PM
1

I return to the thoughts of Mr. Fry often when I think of this topic. Also, It is impolite at best to comment on, but I cannot avoid noticing that even though gay men outnumber lesbians by a considerable margin, who is it that you constantly read about faking hate-crime attacks in the paper? Exactly.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 09:32 AM
4

No. That was her years ago. She wasn't getting enough attention. this is her now. http://www.change.org/petitions/skeptic-s-guide-to-the-universe-remove-rebecca-watson-from-the-show
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:06 AM
59

Rebbeca Watson: so incredibly desperate to be trolled for Skepchick sympathy tears that she actually takes time to respond to "manhood academy" spam. Watson is beyond pathetic, she's into full on histrionic personality disorder at this point.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:19 AM
32

Verily, this does indeed anger me a great deal. Feminist logic: "My body, my choice!! Except when it's men's bodies, and then that's my choice too, obviously." "Well actually circumcision happens because of patriarchy! More feminism will obviously mean less circumcision, but you whiny MRA babies just can't accept THAT!" "Shut up about your little boo-boos you pathetic fringe "intactivists"! Women are suffering, it's time to just cut it out! HAHAHAAA! Uncut "men" look gross anyway!" "Women's bodi…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:15 AM
1

well, this is the biased version, but it's pretty close to what actually happened. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1mLHdTsmPc
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:52 AM
2

I'd say that pretty much covers it.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:21 AM
7

Yup. I remember reading the EXACT same post and thinking precisely the same thing. That was the day I stopped visiting Pharyngula permanently. Here's the post in question. It's beyond disgusting, and when I first began to realize just how insidious feminist ideology could be. It was also the fisrt time I had ever seen the word "mansplaining". A term so mindblowingly ironically idiotic it still baffles me that feminists apparently use it with nary a single thought of how stupid and hypocritical i…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 11:23 PM
8

I am here because I value a cold, dispassionate, rational scientific worldview above nearly all else, and as a result I am a Skeptic. I gave feminist ideology a multi-year long benefit of the doubt, when I frequented "Skepchick", a website run by Rebecca "stop sexualizing me by asking me out for coffee" Watson, which I had thought would have a better chance than any other of wedding feminism to rational skepticism if such a thing were indeed possible, and weeding out at least some of obvious the…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 10:30 PM
8

This is like asking "so what's up with that whole Christianity thing, what's that all about?". At this point there have been literally hundreds of thousands of blog posts about Elevatorgate and the one year later PZ/Thunderf00t incident that touched off the fascist "Atheism plus" movement we're now seeing. I honestly wouldn't even know where to begin explaining the whole thing to someone coming into it completely new, it's such an enormous clusterfuck. It's the reason I'm here too. Start searchi…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 10:01 PM
74

That first one is the single best example of feminist neuroticism about sexuality that I have ever seen anywhere. It's perfect. "Let's dress up as slutty as possible and march down main street to draw attention to our cause!".... "Oh my god, why are you looking at me and filming me with your cameras?! Stop objectifying us! Creeps! Male gaze! Rape enabler!" These retards are literally out of their fucking minds. If any srsers or Futrelles or the like are reading this, do yourself and everyone aro…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 02:41 AM
20

You know this isn't about the tshirts right? It's going to be a movie for kids based on a book whose description is the following: "Girls, here it is—everything you need to know about boys: 1. Boys come from the Stupid Factory. 2. Boys are pretty much smelly and useless. 3. It is possible to have fun with boys, however..... 4. If you decide to keep a boyfriend, he will need to be housebroken. With a South Park-for-girls edgy freshness, artist and entrepreneur (David & Goliath clothing) Todd Harr…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 02:30 AM
9

I didn't even know it was a "book" too. This is outrageously fucking disgusting. Read the description at amazon. This is going to be a movie that literally vilifies young boys and endorses violence against them. Fucking hell, sometimes I wish I never started questioning feminism and society's myriad blind bigotries. http://www.amazon.com/Boys-Stupid-Throw-Rocks-Them/dp/0761135936
/r/MensRights23/09/12 02:13 AM
0

Please upvote this. I really want to read about this kind of news but the Daily Mail is highly disreputable. I cannot trust what I read there.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 12:20 AM
7

I cannot possibly see it ever happening. Feminists simply have no control over what guys do together sexually, thank fuck. It actually seems to be quite irritating to them that this is the case.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 03:55 PM
42

This is what radical feminists have wanted for a very long time. All heterosexual sex is by default rape of a woman unless he's asking her to tick off checkboxes on a list of sex acts every 8 seconds throughout the process. "Oops! Looks like you forgot to check off section 4 subsection j: 'after passing the point of no return, receive clear consent to initiate ejaculatory contractions in the perenium', you're a rapist!". This is fucking psychotic. It treats women like inanimate, brainless coma v…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 10:14 AM
6

You visit boingboing? Lol. I haven't been there in YEARS between the mediawhoring, unbelievably smug, ultra PC Xeni Jardin and the self-righteous, holier than thou fascist faggot moderator you see in the comments, there hasn't been any room for reason or dissent from the visitors there in ages. And yes, I, a gay dude, did just describe that intolerable asshole douchebag using the word faggot.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 07:37 AM
3

So they're the same mods?
/r/MensRights17/09/12 10:22 AM
1

Oops that title was supposed to have a "the". Oh well.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:35 AM
3

Dude's hot, I don't blame 'em. I'd objectify dat ass all night long.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 01:40 AM
-1

With respect, I think you're falling into the trap of perpetuating self-pitying feminist victim culture. It's the kind of "it's not the individual with a mental disorder who has a problem that needs solving, it's our Sick Sad World that made him/her that way.", "Look at all these school shootings nowadays, it's those movies and video games what done it!", "Jessica was raped in broad daylight in a parking lot the other day; well that's the perverted pornography culture we live in now!", "Did you …
/r/MensRights17/09/12 01:14 AM
2

(sorry, had to delete previous reply below, I accidentally posted with the wrong account) Yeah, that won't work. I appreciate the feedback, but I need to keep the atmosphere light, even joking if possible. I'm aware of the grave nature of the topic and the obscenity of having to discuss such a thing in a lighthearted way, but in my family there's simply no way I'm going to earnestly talk about something like 'the personal suffering my penis being cut has caused me'. It would be so utterly bizarr…
/r/MensRights16/09/12 07:01 PM
2

Hey it's not my fault it's fucked up. We don't openly talk about private or deeply personal travails in my family. It's considered unseemly. Lots of families are like that.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 06:59 PM
3

(sorry, had to delete the previous reply below, realized I was posting with wrong account) They're not religious, so at least those arguments are out of the way. It's probably going to be more an argument against the "well, it's just something you have to do, right?" type.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 06:57 PM
2

Yeah it's probably going to have go something along the lines of "sooooo, you're having a boy huh?! Have you had 'the discussion' yet? 'Cause you're not doing THAT, are you??". And then if they say they are I'm not really sure how to respond. I'm thoroughly aware of all the arguments against it, it's just framing the discussion in such a way as to not make everyone think "god I hope a black hole opens up in the floor and swallows all of us whole right now because this is literally the most unfuc…
/r/MensRights16/09/12 06:54 PM
1

None of the people involved in starting Atheism Pus are from SA. It's all coming out of FTB.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 12:39 PM
15

Wow, "udder", scathingly rapier wit there.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 01:21 AM
4

almost?
/r/MensRights14/09/12 05:26 AM
1

It's just a troll account.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 05:26 PM
2

I doubt it'll take a minute. I largely ignore it because it's beyond my general area of interest. I don't feel sufficiently qualified on the subject to justify taking a very hardened view of one school of thought vs another and investing a lot of effort in defending it. In broad terms I lean left while having certain libertarian sympathies; and while I think some government controls are necessary and justified, I also suspect that people like the occupiers make fools of themselves when they atte…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 08:26 AM
16

I reject patriarchy "theory" for the same simple reason I reject critical theory, post-structuralism, women's studies, urban semiotic interpretation, neo-trans-normative queer theory, environmental Marxist constructionism, and any other social "science" garbage that endlessly gushes out of humanities departments that you might wish to name. It's all the same unfalsifiable, subjective opinion masquerading as objective fact horseshit. Scientists doing real science who KNOW what Popperian falsifiab…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:27 AM
6

Circumcision mutilates a boy's penis and prevents him from using its natural function during sex, hypothetical pre-implantation genetic manipulation of a zygote to correct congenital genetic disease has no comparison to this. The child's bodily integrity has not been violated. Worries about genetic modification to genes purported to be involved in emotional propensity have always been overblown to me. They would clearly be an ethical violation to any bioethics board considering the permission of…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:34 PM
12

Well did you report it to the event organizer or take pictures or video of what was going on? I am now reminded in dramatic ways on a daily basis of how incredibly powerful the invention of the CCD and internet connected cell phone is to expose injustice and transform society. Use it! If you see something shitty going on, take out your phone and make a record of it. Who would believe the incredibly awful story of that guy being framed for rape by his landlord if not for that shocking video we al…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:17 PM
5

I'm gay, it's fucktarded; much like the sub it was posted in. This was recently posted here with a lot of good comments on why it's dumb/fake but I can't find it.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:43 PM
3

First in vivo experiments of a novel small molecule where human trials haven't begun yet = 10 years to market....at LEAST.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:50 PM
0

Is KM GWW?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:44 PM
8

I think the only thing I could ever think of if I were Obama trying to work in the oval office would be "I wonder if Clinton blew his load on that table, what about the couch? Jesus, is anything in this room safe? The Jefferson bust, that has to be ok. Oh for fucks', what's this yellow crust on here! God fucking damn it.".
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:31 AM
6

Worldnews is an utter shitpit of unthinking dogmatic zombies who downvote anything straying from the freshman college kid reddit party line. There is zero possibility of enlightened discussion there. Anything containing the obnoxious term "'MURICA!" or variants thereof, anything at all anti-capitalist, anything anti-Israel, anything for outlawing firearm ownership, etc., etc., etc. gets a thousand upvotes and hundred sub-post "omg! ur so rite!" circle jerk following it. I'm a liberal, atheist, g…
/r/MensRights06/09/12 07:52 AM
2

:/ a lot of us didn't
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:32 AM
12

OMG, check your privilege! Stop mansplaining! Lol. The originator of the retarded A+ movement just rage quit the internet in an explosion of crocodile tears about how she "just can't take it anymore" or some bullshit. Meanwhile, the A Pus forums are deeply entrenched in debate about such weighty issues as to what they should replace "GLBT" with, because that obviously reinforces the tyranny of (gay) men being prioritized over lesbians and trans people and all the patriarchal implications that th…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 07:37 AM
3

I prefer my 'accidental' misspelling above.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 01:52 AM
3

Oh Jesus, calm down, I don't want "primitive justice" it's just a dumb offhand comment of frustration.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 02:45 PM
22

Excellent commentary. Starts off a little slow with a somewhat convoluted point, but by the second half is absolutely spot on. Many of us who arrived at our atheism via the route of scientific skepticism (eg. Sagan, Randi, et. al.) saw the current schism coming a long time ago when it was clear that a shitload of "new" atheists coming on board several years back either knew or cared fuck all about the central importance evidence plays in the acceptance or rejection of a belief. And instead, they…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 10:06 AM
21

Jesus fucking Christ, as if it isn't enough that we cannot seemingly go more than 2 weeks without hearing of another of these disgusting cases, we'll now of course be treated to an endless parade of idiotic, simpering headlines either making light of the matter implicitly or outright making fun of the guy directly. It fucking disgusts me whenever I read about one of these cases. To amputate a man's penis, especially a younger man, is to destroy his life utterly. He will never enjoy sex with anyo…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 09:18 AM
14

Oh how I have desperately hoped and patiently waited for something like Atheism Pus for over a year now since elevatorgate. I'm elated the dooshparade of retards from ftb and skepchick have splintered off into their own shitpit of hyper-politically correct dogmatic assholes. Now if only they can promise to stay the fuck away from Randi and my beloved JREF and get Watson aborted off the Skeptic's Guide like a mongoloid fetus, then we could truly rejoice in the great '12 purging of the radfem reta…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 08:46 AM
7

(caveat: Daily Fail) I'll defend its being here instead of wtf; alright, it's not up there with false rape accusation, but it's certainly part of society's demonization and shaming of male sexuality. The guy is facing a potential jail sentence for what is AT BEST a VERY minor faux pas. And shit, this was the guy's first move after 5 MONTHS of dating!? In the gay dude world, if you're not down for at least an hj or a beej after the first date, you're done. Do not expect another date, do not expec…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 12:19 AM
7

Apples oranges much? Dude's facing jail time.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 12:06 AM
3

The same government that finally got around to admitting men are even capable of being raped this year, right?
/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:17 PM
3

Stopped visiting cnn's website years ago when they trashed their entire science staff to focus on more politics. Every time I see a link to one of their shitty articles, it looks even more likely that I made right decision.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:00 PM
29

She didn't know he was recording video, she thought he had called 911.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 06:31 PM
9

Yes, Johnson openly called people niggers, Nixon is on tape making fag jokes and HW Bush called atheists unpatriotic non-citizens, but Obama is far worse than anyone who's come before and literally Hitler.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:21 PM
1

It's true, unfortunately we do get infected with HIV sometimes. Not as often as straight people do though. :/
/r/MensRights02/09/12 11:39 AM
20

They ignore gay porn because they think that's ok. And also because it would destroy their arguments. It would TOTALLY destroy their arguments. Do people know how much gay dudes love porn? Because we fuckin LOVE it. I've never met a dude who even bothered to lie about how much he liked watching porn. And where is this supposed sinister, evil connection between porn, objectification, and things like spousal abuse? Well, shock, it's nonexistent of course. In 2007 1,600 women and 700 men were murde…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 12:27 AM
2

1 in 4 people still think you can get HIV by sharing a fuckin glass of water. There seems to be a consistent subset of the population that's totally unaffected by any efforts at education. I put it down to abysmal scientific illiteracy more than anything. I don't have HIV but it looks like it must be an easy decision to make some effort to hide it in your everyday life when you do. http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/HIV-AIDS-Public-Learning-Curve.jpg
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:51 PM
8

That's a a Zazzle page, anyone who knows how to upload an image on the internet can make one. Additionally, I think those were obviously made in response to the boys/rocks original. It's a little different when the shit's made by a major retailer and distributor. It's not something to totally apeshit over, but I think it's a mistake to dismiss this kind of trash as "just clothes".
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:12 PM
11

Precisely. My question to the op would be why they're even posting in that total shithole at all. It's run by radfem lunatics. All the sane people left ages ago. If op is a guy, he should check out /gaybros.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 06:12 PM
3

Meanwhile, what do you get in the men's section? http://www.davidandgoliathtees.com/men/ad-hd-mens-tee.html and this http://www.davidandgoliathtees.com/men/he-is-gay-mens-preprinted-tee.html Great.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 06:03 PM
4

This us the most parsimonious explanation and I therefore agree with it. However I disagree that other members of the group should be excessively admonished for taking it at face value after seeing the unbelievably disgusting things that recently came out of "radfem hub".
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:17 PM
2

It's astonishing how closely your written rebuttals exactly mirrored my own thoughts as I was reading the article. Thanks for doing the heavy lifting.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 10:45 AM
18

Be careful of citing that Jane Elliot stuff. Watch a few more documentaries on her besides the ones sanctioned by her and it very quickly becomes clear that she is a seriously nasty individual who has merely found a socially accepted way to hector and demonize people in an extremely bigoted way. I do not like her one bit and I find her assumptions about society to be grossly jaundiced at best. She's a mean spirited fascist who'd fit right in at SRS.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:13 PM
7

I'm gay and I hate "heteronormative". It's so stupid, THE ENTIRE WORLD is heteronormative. It's not going to change and that's fine because it's not a problem. If someone sees me wearing a ring on my finger (not that I have one on there), assumes I have a wife and I have to correct them and say I have a husband, who gives a shit? It's not a big deal, there's no inherent bigotry involved. But ask the SRSers of the gay world, AKA "queer theory" majors, and it's the fucking end of the world and evi…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 05:52 PM
23

I think she's just trying to be accurate, man. I admit that I've become suspicious about such neologistic terms as well, given how obnoxiously fond many feminist circles have become of them, but that in and of itself doesn't necessarily negate their utility or impugn their legitimacy. The terms she used actually do have real meaning, and unlike other terms such as the ever annoying "heteronormative", or "cis-privileged" (barf), they don't carry with them any intrinsic bigotry or onerous dogma. T…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 10:32 AM
6

I see. Though it doesn't seem too likely that someone of such sparkling intelligence as this guy's sister, who doesn't see a double standard in the first place, would grasp that sort of didactic facetiousness.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:47 PM
6

Thank you. I don't click on NYT articles anymore after that piece they ran essentially calling for the extermination of men.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:27 PM
6

Wat...
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:21 PM
1

I take your point, as I have made a similar one several times here and use of such terms is indeed likely to be counterproductive. But the idea that "bitch" is even in the same universe of hate as "nigger" is absurd. "Cunt", maybe.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:01 PM
0

The woman is Asian.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 05:24 PM
2

It seems like they're going for some kind of insanity plea, but doesn't that require the beliefs of the perpetrator to be of such that they thought they, or others were in some kind of danger to (in their mind) "warrant" their actions? Anyway, why does this shit seem so much more prevalent in East Asian societies? If you look at a list of recorded cases they're highly overrepresented.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:40 AM
2

I see what you did there.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:26 AM
11

I think it's awesome. Many of us in the skeptic community have been waiting for these fascist radfem lunatics to fracture off into their own asylum for over a year now. Hopefully they'll fuck off and leave the rest of us sane actual skeptics alone.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 06:59 PM
1

Saw it coming a miiiiiile away when the first "episode" was posted.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 09:05 AM
33

Um guys, what's the problem? The investigating officers said it was probably a result of the medication she was on. My anti-misogyny anti-rape orientation class says if a woman is under the influence of drugs or alcohol that any crimes committed while a man is present are automatically his fault. I bet this sick woman-hating fuck was actually trying to rape HER and then kill himself to frame her for his murder post-mortem. Fucking men and their psychotic privilege obsessed rape culture!
/r/MensRights28/08/12 05:21 AM
6

I DID present rational points. Points you obviously are choosing to ignore. Shibal nom.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:51 AM
6

I honestly can't tell if you're just a troll or merely a braying halfwit, but the fact that you claim to find it "strange" that men's rights advocates are trying to take away what you consider as your "right" to grossly violate the bodily integrity of your children indicates to me that you have either not spent more than a few seconds seriously contemplating the ethical implications surrounding cosmetic infant circumcision, or you are willfully blind to the matter as a consequence of unwillingne…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:32 AM
6

That was the last article I will ever read in the New York Times. I've seen several things like this from them in the recent past, but this was so utterly disgusting I really cannot ever give them the business of my clicks and ad-views again. Ever. The comments lauding the writer's opinions are so fucking infuriating as to nearly be beyond belief. If this is what the Times sees fit to publish in its op-ed pages and seemingly endorse with its "editor approved" comments, if this how they see me an…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:03 AM
4

Is the woman unable to do the same? Dat female hypoagency. You're a troll.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 07:21 PM
1

Pardon? I'm fairly sure the citizens of Australia, South Africa and the majority of South America are doing quite well enjoying the fruits of modern civilization.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 03:13 AM
5

Reposting this here, since this appears to have been the first post of the story to the sub. I think I'm done with the Times. Permanently. I almost never read op-eds but this was one of the most disgusting things I have ever read out of that operation. It's a shame too, because they're the paper of record and their science coverage is second to none. The heavily upvoted comments are so outrageously sick and bigoted I don't want to have anything to do with a publication whose readership is that h…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:18 AM
3

This is just silly. Crime in the US has been on a consistent decline for the last 2 centuries. It's the lowest now since it was in the 50s; the lowest it's ever been. It's still falling even now despite the highly reported shooting sprees of late. See Stephen Pinker's work here. Frankly, I don't really look forward to the kind of Mad Max style dystopian future you're fantasizing about merely for the sake of a hypothetically higher fitness men would have in it. I like my modern civilization, cutt…
/r/MensRights26/08/12 12:09 AM
1

I think I'm done with the Times. Permanently. I almost never read op-eds but this was one of the most disgusting things I have ever read out of that operation. It's a shame too, because they're the paper of record and their science coverage is second to none. The heavily upvoted comments are so outrageously sick and bigoted I don't want to have anything to do with a publication whose readership is that hateful and misandric. I almost can't believe what I just read. I am completely disgusted and …
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:41 PM
15

Not simple female fun. Empowering and inspirational recapturing of wymyns agency from the fascist phallocentric patriarchy! I've been meaning to write an extended piece about so called sexual objectification from the point of view of a gay male for a while now for this sub, but haven't gotten around to it yet. Maybe I'll do it now.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:14 PM
6

Should've had less of Juila Gillard nattering on and more about the organization though. Someone should look into doing something like this in the US.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:34 PM
19

I'm aware, yes, and I think they were brilliant. It's obvious to any average person of reasonable intelligence who's seen a billboard in the last decade what those posters were referencing, and there aren't any plausible (mis)interpretations of that message that could be construed as being misogynistic. It's intent was perfectly clear. The new poster on the other hand even I had to think about for a minute before recognizing that it was referencing statistics of DV and not some kind of commentar…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:21 AM
130

I'm gay and this is the correct answer. Andrew Sullivan is a 'tard and his analogy is a load of old rancid horse cum. It totally ignores the fact that gay men are hit on by each other all the time and definitely not always by someone we have a particular interest in fucking. And wouldn't you know it (shock!), we don't react with revulsion and quivering terror! I know, baffling! Usually we just say "no thanks" like any other sane person and go about our business. This bullshit somehow manages to …
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:51 AM
55

I'm disappointed to see this kind of invidious response to what is at best a relatively minor tactical disagreement. It's unfortunate.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:26 AM
13

C'mon man, you know that's not what we're saying. I'll speak for myself, it's certainly not what I'M saying. Be confrontational, be provocative, be a shit-stirrer, by all means. I endorse those tactics and recognize their utility. But do it intelligently and with purpose. The posters you put up in Vancouver were pitch-perfect. Totally incapable of being misconstrued by reasonable people and yet still producing a rabid tirade of outrage among local radfem nuts. Fantastic. This poster in Australia…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:21 AM
48

You beat me to the punch. This is the sort of thing coming out of AVfM and Paul Elam that absolutely baffles me and causes me to very circumspect about that site's motives. I was asked to write a piece for them recently and turned it down in part because of nonsense like this and other similar things I see coming out of that operation. You CANNOT POSSBLY be so naive as to think that a flyer with the nothing but the words "domestic violence, women are half the problem” and a link to a website, is…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 11:24 PM
1

I'm really rather tired of seeing this repulsively anti-gay lunatic's spam everywhere I go on reddit and youtube. I was about to do a post asking if anyone knew who was really behind it, but found this post instead. It would be nice to know if it's just a really persistent deranged wacko, or a troll operation. I'm leaning toward the former. It almost reminds me of the David Mabus nut the skeptic community recently had to deal with.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 11:04 PM
0

I'm someone who's WAY too willing to give the benefit of the doubt, and so having known what this site was about in the past I still gave it a chance and read the article. Yup, it's the same old garbage the Obedient Mangina Project has been pumping out since its inception; which, if memory serves, was originally funded by Ms. Magazine. That alone should tell you everything you need to know about it. The section trying to argue that it isn't different for men and women in bars and that women actu…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 10:22 PM
1

He does have a certain bearish thing going on. Good timing in his act. I'd defo hit it.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:11 PM
2

Fuck Julia Gillard. She's the only prominent atheist I've ever heard claim to be anti-gay marriage. Craven bitch.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 10:44 AM
12

Sorry this is in multiple parts. Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xu4zjJ4PzM8 Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx7mMMYek7E I think this is relevant in this sub for two reasons. One, I've always thought the arguments feminists use against the legalization of prostitution were total paternalistic bullshit, and that women should have the right to do whatever the fuck they want with their bodies so long as it's not harming anyone else, including selling sex. And two, that men who are eit…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 10:36 AM
37

Except that wasn't enough for them, of course. He calls himself a monster and the reply to that post was "how dare you compare your 'suffering' of being a monster to this poor woman's fear of you!!". These people are beyond mere everyday lunatic feminist dogma, they're fucking sick, man.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 06:19 PM
5

I'm a gay dude. If I had a guy who tried to drag me to this kind of shit, I'd drop that fuck like a sack of dirt. The more I read MR, the more I feel sorry for straight guys for having to constantly put up with this kind of shit and all the other "chivalry" crap.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 06:37 PM
-2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ahBIrjQ0oE
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:54 AM
13

This is one of the first serious cracks in the wall that I saw when I self identified as a feminist. I used to post at Skepchick frequently because I thought "if feminism is capable of being done rationally at all, it's going to be here", and I started noticing strange things when the topic of rape came up. Then one day another user posted a reply to a story that went something along the lines of "This is bullshit that women are forced to relive their torment just to ensure their rapist is convi…
/r/MensRights19/08/12 11:27 AM
1

Seconded.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:41 PM
1

This made me sad to read. Have you seen a doctor or endocrinologist about potential problems? It's entirety possible you may need testosterone supplementation if your body's normal level is very low. Do you lift at all?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:27 PM
3

rrrright, but that's not really the point I was making. I was trying to illustrate, using the example of alcohol, how (at least certain types) feminists fixate on traditionally male-associated activities and demonize and blame them for all manner of social ills. Others had the video game thing covered already, so I figured I'd chime in on this. It may not be a sentiment expressed by feminists today, but the underlying misandric and irrational censorious aspects of the ideology remain. If you hav…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:49 PM
1

Not a fan of that wacky spamming site at all. Frankly, most of the stuff on there is so dumb I wouldn't be surprised to see it revealed at some point as a SRS/feminist troll operation.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:33 PM
2

This is might be my favorite comment out of the 150 so far. It's exactly what I meant.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 07:56 PM
2

"Foolish Men is a new collaboration made up of Leeds based artists..." NOPE.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 07:33 PM
5

It was in very large part feminists who sucessfully organized to outlaw alcohol last century. Of course that resulted in abject disaster, instantly creating a black market of organized crime that would kill hundreds before people finally came to their senses and prohibition was repealed in the '30s.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:51 PM
2

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:31 PM
9

Oh man, I love watching two guys beat the shit out of each other on MMA too! I grew up being told all that kind of stuff was bad and that I shouldn't like it. Then I discovered I was gay and all the other gay guys I knew didn't like it either....but I soon discovered I didn't like any of the boring shit gay men were "supposed to" like, and I really love MMA. I can see why boxing is called the sweet science now. It's awesome and primal and satisfies something deep in the psyche, and I especially …
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:20 PM
25

Cannot upvote enough. I absolutely loathe the feminist newspeak bullshit like "trigger warnings". If you're so fucked in the head that you can't even read text descriptions of events on a screen without having a psychotic break, you do not belong on the internet. Frankly you don't even belong in the real world, you belong in a psych ward. Please don't just ape the inkhorn terms of feminists without thinking first, the overwhelming majority of them are just dumb.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 09:34 AM
0

So she should serve jail time because even though it was consensual sex with another adult she "could've" fucked someone even younger. Wow. Flawlessly logical argument there. Someone better come arrest me and throw me in the clink immediately then because last night when I was cooking some steak up on the grill it totally "could've" been my dog that I was actually roasting alive! Who's to say that next time it won't be the neighbor's new baby! Get real, dude.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:50 PM
2

Nope, just the ones who continuously regurgitate feminist dogmas repackaged with a thin veneer of "actually this is good for men too" in simpering and cynical attempt to garner unwitting assent from MRAs. You're transparent as glass, dearie.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:49 PM
2

Miss the point much? The relevant quote from the very article you link being "She is the second woman since World War II to receive the nation's third-highest combat medal.". Even in the modern West where women are given the opportunity to seve in combat positions, it borders on the the imbecilic to suggest that men aren't the extreme, overwhelming majority of people who fight and die in war. If you're interested in trolling for feminism you should at least put some effort into making it somewha…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:22 PM
2

That's fine, I'm just giving a heads up as to what's going on with that account around here.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:02 PM
0

I don't deny that it's a serious ethical breach for professors to fuck their students. The teacher undoubtedly deserves to be fired, I just don't think the law should have anything to say about it, in the same way that that I think cheating rings should be expelled from a school but there's certainly no need for criminal prosecution in those cases.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:59 PM
3

She's also a troll account.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:52 PM
1

Me either. I've only ever heard the snoozefest that is women's hour. Shit's duller than "Sailing By". I got a PM from someone who appears to be on "the inside" though, and he says he has access to all the episodes going back 2 years. So maybe I can upload to youtube when he gets them.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:53 PM
1

I guess there are always going to be people out there who think we just don't have enough phenomenally stupid laws on the books already and we need MORE!
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:47 PM
13

I was about to post the same thing. If the students involved here really are all over 18, the idea of this woman serving 20 years in jail for what amounts to consensual sex with adults is beyond outrageous. This is an ethical violation, not a criminal matter. By all means fire the teacher, that's certainly warranted. But jail time simply because it was between a student and teacher? What the fuck? Are we going to start sending the adult-ed night class teachers to jail if they have a one off fuck…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:04 AM
0

Troll account. Downvoted.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:14 PM
3

I just found it a really disturbing story and reaction that so many would think it so hilarious that a man would have his penis severely physically injured because of an involuntary, natural physiological reaction. And then that he "deserved it" because he had a girlfriend already? It made me angry. I guess few others feel similarly.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:38 PM
0

I'm not talking about those things, you're shifting goal posts. I'm talking about pain, which is inherently subjective and shows your original claim to be moronic.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:30 PM
0

Is a hangnail worse than an amputated finger? Pain is subjective and some microsurgery can always reattach that digit. Don't be ridiculous.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:16 AM
2

Where is the whole video?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:22 PM
7

For anyone going into this not knowing what it's about, this is a crushingly tragic story. It will haunt you for some time and your day will be significantly shittier for it. That said, it is extremely important. It essentially decimates the feminist / sociologist dogma of gender merely being a product of environment and "a performance" as they so often vapidly proclaim. A family was utterly and permanently devastated, and two people are dead because of a dumb, totally unnecessary procedure.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 09:11 AM
1

Your lack of imagination in the project of envisioning positive directions for a particular comment is neither my problem nor interest. Further, I find your comparison of my statement to others' clumsy analogies tendentious and absurd. I feel no compunction to the feminist impulse of hypersensitive eggshell tip-toeing when discussions of rape are the topic at hand. I stand by my original comments.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:54 AM
13

How have they not been sued yet? This case would be perfectly straightforward in the US as sex discrimination.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 02:46 AM
6

A scene from the imbecillic movie "Swordfish", which, if it weren't for a man being violently raped in an extremely disturbing fashion, would merely be another unremarkable idiotic depiction of "computer hacking" that Hollywood inexplicably continues to cynically shit out as "entertainment". I found this scene particularly unsettling. Imagine someone pointing a gun at your head and forcing you to comply with a sex act demanded by a woman. How would that not fuck you up psychologically for the re…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 01:48 AM
0

On my phone w/<2min battery left. Look at tf00t's blog and pz's shithole at ftblogs to get the whole story.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 11:47 AM
0

The backstory is so deep on this bullshit now I can't reasonably expect anyone who hasn't been following it to know what the shit's going on at all anymore. It's fucking exasperating. Now thunderf00t's being sued for publishing "private" emails from a listserv or some shit. Who the fuck knows. I don't even care what the Watson/Myers Taliban are doing any more, just stay out of my JREF and TAM.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 11:15 AM
5

That was the single most poorly written piece of shit that I have ever read on a mainstream news website. Ever. A 10 year old could write more coherently.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 12:49 AM
2

An entire sub filled with people proving my point for me. That place is loony.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 06:38 PM
3

It's ambiguous. If he's an older man and this happened in the 60s or something, or perhaps if it happened outside the US more recently, I can see it happening. But if it supposedly happened more recently, it's just unthinkable to me a hospital in the West could commit such a gross ethical violation. The prospect of lawsuit alone would be terrifying to them. I'm going to post a message on the site asking him to do an ama here.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 07:13 AM
4

That's why I'm suspicious of the story's truth. I'd like to see some verification from the man it happened to. It's practically inconceivable to me that a doctor could do such a thing without the patient's consent.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 02:18 AM
2

You fucking sicko rape apologist! How dare you suggest questioning wymynns ways of knowing should ever be necessary! You think this shit's insane? This same woman recently went on Amanda Marcunt's podcast (and I use that slur completely advisedly, as this is the disgusting bitch who despite the complete exoneration of the Duke lax team, and the confession of the woman accusing them of rape that she made up the entire goddamn thing, continues to demonize the men on the team as rapists on her shit…
/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:32 PM
6

It was considered, the authors report they are unable to account for such a large disparity even taking into account under-reporting by females. I dismiss the supposition that propensity toward masturbation is in any important or meaningful way significantly decoupled from necessity. Any male will tell you simply as a matter of common knowledge that the drive to take care of business on a regular basis is extremely powerful and not at all easily ignored. The grotesque psychological damage ravage…
/r/MensRights10/08/12 09:19 PM
4

I take as reference the paper by Pinkerton, Bogart, Cecil, and Abramson, which finds 98% of college age men reporting that they have ever masturbated. Only 44% of females report the same. Similarly, men reported masturbating on average 12 times per month. The average number for women? Less than 5 times. Masturbation is simply a necessary part of being an adolescent male, but is not nearly as important for females.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 08:30 PM
14

My understanding is that the diagnosis of hysteria is considered pseudoscientific, and that the habit of visiting the doctor who would basically finger his patients was merely done because it felt really good. In an era of chaste Victorianism, what better way to get women to absolve themselves of the guilt of masturbation than to medicalize the procedure in a kind of folie a deux where the doctor gets paid for his "services" and the woman gets a nice afternoon orgasm? Not masturbating doesn't ac…
/r/MensRights10/08/12 06:06 PM
27

I never considered the asymmetry in this case. Masturbation is perceived as "empowering" and "liberating" for women, and still retains a residue of shame and embarassment for men. Men, incidentally, of whom the necessity of masturbation is essentially requisite and unquestionably far greater than in women.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 03:35 PM
17

I'm genuinely frightened by the amount of anger this evoked in me. So much so that I'd actually like to see a verification of its veracity, perhaps an ama type interview or something. Isn't consent from the boy required in patients of a sufficient age to decide on elective surgery themselves? It is impossible to comprehend how gross a betrayal of the parent-child relationship is in a case like this. I would suggest a case may be made for a crime like this being worse than rape.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 03:23 PM
2

I agree with your take on the matter. I've read a few of that guy's articles and seen some of his videos, and to be perfectly honest, I find him to be a bigoted lunatic.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 09:47 AM
3

I find this sort of contorted rationalizaton from MRAs like the guy who wrote that article to be the absolute height of cynical misanthropy. If you've convinced yourself of the acceptability to not even bother calling the cops if you see someone being raped, you're quite frankly fucked in the head and not someone I would ever want to know in real life. This guy is the equivalent of radical lesbian sepratists who demonize men and divorce themselves from society as a consequence of their decision …
/r/MensRights10/08/12 09:45 AM
1

As I say, I certainly don't expect anyone to watch all of it. Just mostly a heads up for former fans of this guy, as he used to be quite popular on youtube.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 12:31 AM
1

He's 23
/r/MensRights09/08/12 09:30 PM
1

He deleted his old account. He actually used to be very interesting and reasonable, and had quite a large following.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 07:07 PM
5

Does anyone else remember Nick from his former channel a few years ago before he started his pomo philosophy degree, when he was a reasonable, level-headed youtube atheist? This is what he's allowed himself to become. I don't expect you to bother watching the whole thing, I just thought it was a good example of what a philosophy/women's studies type indoctrination (one cannot reasonably call it an education) does to a formerly thinking mind. It is quite literally a religion that can make men hat…
/r/MensRights09/08/12 06:46 PM
1

I am afraid I again disagree with your argument in total. The last sentence of your response is precisely what I am saying. You don't and shouldn't have control over images taken of you publicly unless you can prove demonstrable harm via their being used to misrepresent you. I'm not going to do a long response here, rather I'm going to collect my thoughts about the thing and make a self post, where the conversation may continue.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 09:13 AM
3

Ah, I see what you're saying. However, I also reject the narrative in its entirety. I'll grant that my analogy was imperfect, in that swimsuit issue models intend their pictures for that purpose, while those merely engaged in sport do not. Though this is inconsequential in my view. The idea that you can or should control the interpretation of pictures taken of you publicly, to me, is an absurdity. The whole idea that it's acceptable for men to sexualize or objectify a picture of a female body in…
/r/MensRights08/08/12 08:01 PM
11

I wish I had a million upvotes for this. I learned very quickly that if you're a gay dude who happenes to be conventionally masculine and who actually likes his masculinity (the horror!), feminists want to have nothing whatsoever to do with you and will treat you with just as much contempt and disdain as they do a masculine straight guy. They've cultivated a sexist ideology that devalues and denigrates manhood.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 06:24 PM
17

I don't really have any problem with this. It is objectifying men, but that isn't really a cause of harm in and of itself in the same way that men's magazines "swimsuit issues" or whatever do the same with women. I really only have a problem with it when they start shaming men's bodies by mocking dick size or something like that. That's shitty. Simply admiring or ogling pictures of sexually attractive men or women is harmless. Of course, if this were a gallery of tits in a men's magazine the rea…
/r/MensRights08/08/12 05:56 PM
5

Creepy SRS poster alert
/r/MensRights08/08/12 05:48 PM
2

Thi-s is the di-anne Rh-ee-m show, we-ll be ta-aking your ca-alls, tweets, fa-ce-bo-ok me-sa-a-ges and pho-one calls af-ter the bre-a-ak.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 08:03 AM
5

...wat. Please explain to me how advocating for the right of boys to retain bodily integrity over the preservation of a part of their anatomy that is intrinsically and exclusively male can have anything to do with being "incredibly feminine". I don't understand why guys are often so eager to surrender some particular uncommon activity or experience had by men to the wastelands of femininity. Masculinity is wider, deeper, and better than that.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 07:49 AM
3

I think it's an awesomely chosen name. Having a foreskin makes fapping significantly easier and men should not be made to feel ashamed about the necessity of masturbation by anyone. It's like taking a piss or scratching an itch, it's harmless, in our nature, and we need to do it.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 07:37 AM
1

Wait a minute! I thought real psychics didn't exist! lol. That's precisely what's going to happen. Then watson will of course parlay that into untold number of hits to her site where she'll stoke the outrage with denunciations of his white, cis-heterosexist, rich, old, anglo-saxon male privilege. Heh. We should start a countdown clock.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 03:14 AM
8

Seconded
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:09 AM
36

Haha, can-fap. Cool. I like it. Every time I'm with an uncut guy I feel a kind of envy, and sometimes, maybe even a little bit of shame. My dick doesn't work right because it was mutilated when I was an infant. That's the truth of the matter, isn't it? I hate self-pitying victim culture and so it's difficult for me to use that word, "mutilated". Somehow I still think it's too inflammatory or hyperbolic, but that's what happened. I don't resent it, what's done is done long ago and it would be stu…
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:08 AM
4

Jesus fuckin' CHRIST, is this right?! I read that same line in the original post and had the same "citation please" thought as the reply above because it seemed way high to me. Is it possible this is an inflated figure somehow? Do we have a secondary source on this? That's such an outrageous number I think I need to doubly verify it preferably through a disinterested third party. E1: ok it looks like that study is pretty old, from the 70s but a newer study still comes up with a number over a hun…
/r/MensRights06/08/12 09:29 AM
1

Can I see that thread? It's entirely possible that maybe I'm listening too closely, but to me, it seems increasingly as though with every new episode of the SGU she's gone from being a normal, if banal, member of the group, to being barely tolerated and even outright resented at times. I really think Steve is getting sick of her shit.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 01:21 AM
2

I agree with most of this and while I'm not totally on board with all her points for many of the reasons already pointed out by others below, overall I was very pleasantly surprised by the rationality and candor of the video. I've been a long time subscriber of hers and have always had a lot or respect for her skeptical and deep thinking ability, so after the recent couple videos she put up I was really thinking this latest one would be a train wreck of radfem bullshit and I would have to conseq…
/r/MensRights06/08/12 12:49 AM
1

I'm sorry I missed this conversation last week. I endorse your view 100% and seeing some blatantly anti-gay replies to it makes me disappointed that a certain segment of the MRM still doesn't get it. I think they're thoroughly in the minority in reddit/mr though.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 08:49 PM
3

Fair points. I'm only in my early 30s so I'm definitely not of the era of the show, and have only seen clips. It may also be notable that virtually all references to the show ever mentioned in the current era talk about how shocking and awful it is that it was acceptable for a joke to be made of a man threatening to beat his wife back then. That's the main focus of everyone's attention and memory of it now;everything else is lost as apparently unimportant details, but the trope of the "dumb man/…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 08:28 PM
2

The person linked to in that blog is DEFINITELY not a scientist. In fact, there were no scientists at all on the panel in the video. They sure do like to pretend though.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:34 PM
21

Obviously. I mean, of course it is. Newton's Principia Mathematica is a "rape manual" doncha know. Or at least that's what postmodern feminist Sandra Harding would tell you.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 10:03 AM
7

Try openly saying anything slightly less than obsequiously fawning about Skepchick on any of the related posts at r skeptic and see where that gets you. Hint: you're going to have to go to the bottom of the page. http://www.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/xj9dp/skepchicks_jamila_bey_owns_antigay_bigots_on/
/r/MensRights05/08/12 09:52 AM
9

I think if any of these guys are going to denounce this sort of stupidity, it's going to be Dawkins. He does not suffer fools gladly and I was shocked at how quickly he shut up and stopped defending himself after he was attacked as a "rape enabler" after elevatorgate. I have a sneaking suspicion (well, hope, anyway) that his next book may be focused on such issues. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=IzNwjfbVt-U#t=268s
/r/MensRights05/08/12 09:42 AM
19

Ugh, you're gonna make me watch it again?!? You sick bastard! lol. Most of the stuff I'm talking about happens within 5-10 minutes of the time where I started the video. But to be more precise, here's several of the worst few: http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=UUupX3k88Z1cRYCDuCPrmxlg&feature=player_detailpage&v=v5uvPhZ29fs#t=2154s http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=UUupX3k88Z1cRYCDuCPrmxlg&feature=player_detailpage&v=v5uvPhZ29fs#t=2200s http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=UUupX3k88Z1cRYCDuCPrmxlg&…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 04:45 AM
24

I can't stand her on the SGU. The other guys seem like normal, cool guys you'd have fun hanging out with, and then whenever Rebecca opens her mouth it's always to say something nauseatingly jaded, dripping with condescension, and smugly sanctimonious. No wonder her husband divorced her after like a year. Lol. What a mistake that was of him to propose to her at TAM. She's insufferable.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 03:24 AM
52

I was a regular of the Skepchick site around two years ago, and while there was the occasional bit of anti-male, academic feminist nonsense expressed there, it generally wasn't awful and I was willing to excuse it as I still identified as a feminist at the time. Then, elevatorgate happened. I can't really summarize it adequately because there are literally tens of thousands of blog posts on it at this point. Suffice it to say, Rebecca Watson was asked out for coffee while on an elevator, took it…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 03:19 AM
64

I started the video of this "skepchicon" conference around the middle where some of the nastiest parts can be seen within a few minutes, but rest assured if you can make it through the whole thing there are many other disgusting misandric pearls of rancid jizzdom awaiting the viewer throughout. This is what Skepchick and "Freethought blogs" are doing to the skeptic / atheist movement. I know I can't be the only skeptic in here and so I wonder what you guys think of this situation. Is it hopeless…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 02:53 AM
7

It's amazing how the pendulum of public opinion on what is an acceptable form of humor can swing so wildly from one extreme to the other in just a few decades.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 02:21 AM
1

Cool man, thanks.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 01:53 AM
1

The overwhelming majority of guys and male couples that I've been with have open relationships and a healthy understanding of the VERY high likelihood of their dude wanting to play around with other guys from time to time. I have a very dim view of gay guys who demand monogomy in their relationships and then act shocked and devastated when they find out their guy stopped off for a handjob with a hot man they happened to be jogging through the park with on the way home. It's juvenile, it's stupid…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 11:32 PM
1

Go scurry back to r/conservative, asshole.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 10:40 PM
7

I know Eve Ensler is a fucking disgusting misandric bigot because I can feel it deep in the base of my big fat cock. Lol. God she's absolutely vile. Look up one of her speeches on yt that she gave to a TED conference in India recently. It's literally so insanely deranged and filed with hate for men that it's indistinguishable from some kind of wacky self-parody. Of course, full standing ovation from the audience of mostly men at the end of it, natch. Mindbending. We need some kind of equivalent …
/r/MensRights04/08/12 10:22 PM
19

For me, as a gay dude, one of the most important parts, if not THE most important part of the project of gay rights, is hopefully the eventual total destigmatization of homosexual sex. In other words, I'm in this thing in big part for my straight brothers too. After all, there are many more of you than there are of us. This is very closely aligned to MR in my view. I never want to read about another high school football player blowing his brains out because he was suspected (not even proven) to …
/r/MensRights04/08/12 09:20 PM
1

Troll much?
/r/MensRights04/08/12 08:34 PM
8

...says Mr. Cockpuncher. Lol
/r/MensRights04/08/12 08:28 PM
4

....wat. That was incomprehensible, sorry. It seemed like you were trying to ask a question of gay dudes sympathetic to the MRM, and as one I'm certainly willing to give that a shot, but I honestly cannot make heads or tails at all of wtf you're trying to say dude.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 08:19 PM
1

Oh come on, don't be so defensive, no one's saying you're "not a man". You're being needlessly deliberately tendentious. I specifically noted that I'm not mean or nasty to feminine guys at all If they proposition me. Not wanting to fuck you isn't equivalent to discrimination or "stigmatization", despite what the person replying earlier seems to think. It's like trying to claim I'm a misogynist because I said I like dudes and don't want to fuck women.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 08:00 PM
2

Hard to say. You have a lot of videos and I was watching many of them. I think one of them had something to do with that 'million mom' group of whiny babies but I don't remember. Anyway, it doesn't really matter. It's not like I'd want to see them deleted or anything. They're irrelevant so long as I know where you stand on the issue.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 06:17 AM
7

Precisely. And Re the thing about amount of sex, it always struck me as amazing that feminists still try to vomit out their party line at every opportunity that "there are no real differences between men and women with regard to sexual desire.". Fuckin' really?! Seriously? Look at the differences in the number of lesbian vs. gay bars, look at the local m4m vs. w4w sections in in your local craigslist, better yet show me a lesbian bathhouse or a lesbian equivalent to a glory hole. Lol. They don't…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 04:18 PM
12

It's scary how accurate this is, lol. http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=1927 But yea, it's nice because there's no bullshit head games about sex when you're with a dude. No neurotic ulterior motive shit. I'm a dude, I know what my buddy needs and how often he needs it, I give my dude what he needs, he does the same for me. Done.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 03:56 PM
13

PZ lost me some time ago for his shitty sanctimonious dogmatism. A big, BIG disappointment for me was last year when Bad Astronomer Phil Plait fully signed on to Skepchick's point of view during elevatorgate and pointed his readers to a disgusting little feminist screed called "Schrodinger's rapist", which, if you haven't had the repugnant displeasure of having read it yet, essentially exhorts the reader to view all men as potential rapists. Sick shit that if you replaced gender with race, would…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 10:38 AM
2

Watching radical feminism in the form of Skepchick slowly wriggle it's fetid tendrils of irrationality and sexism into the skeptic community over the past year. It's infecting my most cherished worldviews of enlightenment rationality and scientifically skeptical ideology with its bigotry, and I hate it for that.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 09:55 AM
13

Bro-love fistbump* Yea man, that JREF thing really fucked me off. DJ's an awesome guy and it made me so angry to see him being demonized by her, PZ Myers, Greta Christina, and their dogmatic radfem ilk. Anyway, I don't wanna be presumptuous, but have you ever gotten shit from feminists or other gay dudes because you either are a normally masculine guy yourself, or expressed disinterest in relationships with femme guys? Man that irritates me. I'm a dude who likes dudes. I'm not going to be mean o…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 09:40 AM
3

It's cool to hear you say this. I subbed to your yt channel (if this is the same dude, which I assume it is) a few days ago and the comments on one of the older vids were really shitty, with 'fags-this' and 'queers-that' type stuff that was disappointing to see. I assumed it was just general youtube bullshit that you didn't condone, but couldn't find anything explicitly stating so in your commentary. It appears to me that sometimes certain segments of the MRM, typically the reaaally old guys, ca…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 09:15 AM
46

Hey dudes. Gonna hijack your top post 'cause it makes me happy to see this here and I think reddit pretty much gets this issue right. I'm a gay bro and I just made my first comment a couple days ago here. It's my first comment on any MR board of any kind and I'm newly identifying with the cause. For a very long time, even as a conventionally masculine gay dude, I bought the party line on feminism/patriarchy, etc., but as a long time skeptic, I could no longer ignore the cracks in the wall. Recen…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 08:52 AM
2

I was just going to post this. I really hope gww's being sarcastic. I think she is, but as a skeptic, seeing this kind of thing always worries me.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:34 AM
2

You fucking sick misogynistic piece of dogshit! When a disgusting, creepy man like you sexualizes and objectifies a woman by commenting on her appearance you're using your white, heteroprivileged, cis-normative male gaze to demean her body and degrade her personhood. You fucking rape-culture enabling sexist neckbeard! When a woman sexually objectifies a man she's taking control of her sexuality in an empowering way that should be congratulated because she's brave enough to smash the oppressor's …
/r/MensRights02/08/12 10:09 AM
15

I'm a gay dude. Do you know how much we "objectify" each other in the world of gay men? We consume HUGE amounts of porn, check out other dudes constantly, make nightclubs into meat markets like you've never even imagined before, hire tricks at a phenomenally high rate and built places called bathouses where you can go to fuck someone in total anonymity without, if you so choose, saying a single word the entire time. I mean for fucks sake we invented the goddamn glory hole, a thing that literally…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter