TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

coachbradb Archive

View 5 posts and 210 comments by coachbradb on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Thanks for the info. Really not looking for solutions though. I am going to accept it but our relationship will change. I was awarded our mobile home in the divorce. I moved and let her live in it. She put it in her name. All I have to do, I called an asked, is go to the DMV with the divorce papers and apply for the title. They will give it to and I am going to sell the mobile home. She will have to move and I will tell her that this makes up for the lost child support. My other option is to pre…
/r/MensRights15/08/20 01:20 AM
1

Kansas is strange. They have an equation.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 08:14 PM
1

I am thinking about calling her on this. I might call her and tell her I am bringing the kids over and she can keep them full time. That it is cheaper for me to pay her 55 a month than to keep the kids. She will not take them. She does not want them.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 08:14 PM
57

Perhaps I will tell the story of the divorce. In that case the only good thing was in fact the female judge. She told my wife to sit down and shut up. It was actually my attorney and her office that were the problem.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 03:58 AM
18

Nope. Already contacted a lawyer.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 03:54 AM
15

This is what I am going to do. I do not make much money, that is the problem. I have MS and only make about 300 a week as a full time sub. That means a month off around Christmas and 3 months in the summer. The judge figured my wages at 500 a week for 12 months.
/r/MensRights12/08/20 11:35 PM
-1

HAHAHAA. still proving my point. Thanks so much. Sorry you hate your parents so much.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 07:36 PM
-5

Insanely attacking someone for what is best put in a medical sub proves my point. You pointing out a typing error also proves my point.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 06:32 PM
-1

No, the responses i got is what proves these people are insane. I have even had people in here say that their parents should be in prison for having it done. Also I do not tend to be nice to insane one issue idiots who destroy a place for people to get information about mens rights with their insane rants about a perfectly fine medical procedure.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 06:31 PM
-2

Nope. falls under parents rights and medical. Again guys thanks for confirming the insanity
/r/MensRights19/10/19 06:29 PM
-1

Thanks for confriming it.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 06:28 PM
-27

Except the mayo clinic says differently. But you keep being insane ta ta. Supposed to be a mens rights page not a OMG circumcision page. Bet you support parents giving hormones to kids for gender reassignment. Wont be able to read your reply as I will be blocking you and I have already left the sub. Really wish there was a real mens right sub out there, not one for loons like you.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 02:51 PM
-28

Thanks for proving my pint. Ta ta.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 02:50 PM
-46

I had forgotten why I left this sub a few years back. Now I remember. Insane anti-circ idiots.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 02:06 PM
37

Single dad here. They dont exist. Even when I went to the public defenders office to help with my divorce the walls were covered with posters telling women to turn in bad men. Everytime I cam in for a meeting the secretary would treat me like an abuser until she found out I was a client. The lawyer told me that she really had never helped a man before and didnt know how to do it. Been raising my kids by myself since they were 5 and 2. No help from any group.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 02:19 PM
1

Mayo Clinic and APA have stated that very real health benefits exist but not so great as to make it universal like vaccinations. If it were more common in Africa the AIDS rates would most likely be cut in half. But thats ok. As long as you get to sit in a coffee shop and bitch about your parents.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 01:40 PM
1

According to healthcare groups and experts it is.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:43 AM
-1

I have. They are drowned out by the anti-circ Nazis. But its ok. I am now just using this thread to put fanatics on ignore so I never have to run across any post they ever make. Perhaps they should change the name of the sub so people do not accidentally come to it thinking it is a sub about men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 12:58 AM
-2

Perhaps you should discuss mens rights on a mens rights page. Guess we could talk about video games too.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 10:19 PM
-5

Equivocating nonsense. Yes strapping a 13 year old girl down to an old dirty table and cutting up her genitals with a rusty knife is exactly the same as a doctor preforming a medical procedure that has clearly defined health benefits. There is no discrimination here. The you cant see this obvious fact, then fine. The rational people will leave to a mens rights sub that talks about mens rights.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 10:08 PM
-4

Your discussion two different things. Tata.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 09:56 PM
-5

Not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 09:53 PM
-6

Its a healthcare issue and parenting. Has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 09:53 PM
-5

Like to discuss mens rights on the mens rights page. Not healthcare options.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 09:52 PM
3

Why does she assume that this weapon was built only by men? We have many women scientist, had a woman Sec of State, I am sure that some of the people identified as one of the mythical 200 genders. She is actually saying that women are not smart enough and do not have enough free will to work in weapons development
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:11 PM
1

The benefits are so minuscule they're essentially meaningless, and hardly any of them apply to children Top world medical scientist disagree. and it is utterly preposterous to suggest parents should have the right to decide. It's not their penis. Its not their tonsils. It's totally unnecessary Neither is removing tonsils. and if the boy grows up to believe a fraction of a percent here and there in benefit is worth losing the most sensitive part of his penis over, Seems everything is about sex wi…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 03:09 PM
0

HAHA. So sorry that I have posted the studies done by these organizations a 100 times and people like you refuse to do your own research. I have provided evidence and cited them many times. Perhaps you should get off the conspircy sites and do a little digging. They really are not hard to find. Here let me help you.l Open browser>go to google>type Mayo clinic circumcision into search box>hit enter>click on the site. No one is required to provide the same links and the same citations to every sin…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:45 PM
1

Of course, the "freedom of religion argument" At no point have I made this argument. I base my argument, that it should be left up to doctors and parents, on studies done by the Mayo clinic, World Health Organization and the American Pediatric Association. You know, well known medical and scientific organizations. I at no point have advocated cutting any child. In fact my son was not cut. There is no correlation between MGM, what you idiots like to call it and the medical procedure of circumcisi…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:23 PM
-1

WOW! Everyday on here people like you make me lose more faith in humanity. So to you... Scientific studies have nothing to do with science. Love this statement. There is very little to almost no argument within the medical/scientific community that health benefits exist for getting circumcised. You see how I didn't use the biased, conspiracy theory, ignorant term MGM. You are no different than when people refuse to call illegal immigrants or Islamic terrorist by what they are. We are talking abo…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:34 PM
-2

Hmm. Same exact argument anti-vaxers make. You are in good company. Both groups are anti-science.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:25 PM
0

Your statement is completely false.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:24 PM
0

Yes. The Mayo clinic, WHO and APA all think that their are health benefits.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:23 PM
1

Sounding like a broken record here but perhaps you should do some research at the Mayo clinic, World health organization and the APA. But do not let science get in the way of your narrative.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:20 PM
-1

Funny how all European authorities, plus Aus, NZ and Canada seem to disagree. Actually they dont. Some courts have made rulings about older children but very few rulings about new born children. t's almost as if cultures that practise genital mutilation tend to find reasons to defend it. Yes cultures that practice(spelled that for you) throat mutilation(removing tonsils) seem to find reasons to defend it. Yep, like not getting AIDS.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:29 PM
-1

Every developed nation outside of 'Murica thinks the practice is barbaric and should be outlawed No. I guess it's ok for you to ignore all non-American science. W.H.O. Yep that is American science. Also circumcision is legal in almost every country. There have been rulings by some courts, only a few, that having it done to older children is wrong and these rulings do not include new born babies. Also the rulings only include "cosmetic" circumcision. Since circumcision has been proven to have lon…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:27 PM
1

I feel for you. I tell you what. I will go through your post history and find 28 post you have made and upvote them :)
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:51 PM
-2

My son was born in China, I lived there for 6 years and my wife is Chinese, and they really dont do it over there. They do have a booming business for teens and adults getting it done now though. He is 10 now and I would not have it done now. I do believe 100% though that this should be left up to the parents and doctors. The evidence is clear that there are health benefits to this procedure. I tend to agree with the findings of the Mayo clinic and APA, I know this sounds like a broken record bu…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:50 PM
1

even -28 is a small group. Yes, my inbox went on fire too. Sometimes I use this to weed out the insane people. Not shy about using the block button.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:43 PM
1

Thank you. :) have a great day.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:42 PM
-5

The AIDS one was based on fraudulent evidence. No The ones for bacterial infections exist but you can treat those without any permanent harm being done. So can tonsillitis but you support taking them out. you are not even consistent in your insanity. permanent measure such as circumcision is no longer necessary and harmful. See Mayo clinic, WHO, and APA. Also good job on ignoring doing it at a later date Its not germane to the argument. We are talking about parents making a decision to have a pr…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:05 PM
3

I think that debate was settled a while ago but if you have sufficiently strong counter arguments or evidence go for it. As I have stated before I direct you to the Mayo clinic, WHO, and the APA. So yes the debate has been settled a while ago. Settled with science. If you believe in one then you cannot believe in the other since one fundamentally precludes the other. Actually you can have a third opinion that is it should be left up to the doctors and the parents. But that would go against your …
/r/MensRights22/03/17 04:02 PM
2

Yes, all male babies should be protected from unnecessary medical procedures just like all other human beings and you in all your medical training get to be the one who decides that is necessary. Not the parents nor the doctors. Tradition or the desires of the parents should not detriment that persons health or right to bodily integrity. I agree. That is why I follow the recommendations of trained doctors and scientist at the Mayo clinic, WHO and the APA instead of some guy on the internet who s…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:59 PM
-4

(lets say there was extremely strong evidence it prevented STD transmission in adolescents not that there is) Already exists. See Mayo Clinic, WHO, APA.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:56 PM
-1

If vaccines are shown to do harm then they shouldn't be administered. They are. There is always a small percentage who are harmed. The argument is that it is for the greater good. Perhaps you should pick up a science book. The whole autism thing is based on a faulty study. Never mentioned this once. But you should look up the stats. My son almost died from a reaction to a vaccine but I still advocate getting vaccines. Keep trying with you straw mans. You should probably look this up too. I will …
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:56 PM
2

This is so funny to read. How you present him with logic and he just throws it out the window in support of his new chosen religion. The Cult of the Foreskin. I like that and hope you allow me to use it in the future.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:50 PM
0

No irony is lost. Said the guy who the irony is lost on. You just seem to not understand the difference between an action and an opinion. So you are saying that this guy personally went out and performed a circumcision? NO YOU IDIOT. He stated that some people have different opinions. You do not understand the difference. It's not really a cult. Its real close. I would call it Fascist though. That is a better definition. If you want to legalize bodily harm If you want to give parents the choice …
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:49 PM
0

I'm not rationalizing an opinion. Yes you are. This is exactly what you are doing by definition. You don't understand the difference between an opinion and an action No. He seems to understand it perfectly. It is you who is having problems with this. An opinion has no physical manifestation. The opinion is if the physical manifestation should happen, not happen or having no care if it happens either way. As a teacher you would be failing in my logic class. We could probably both agree that peopl…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:46 PM
0

Spot on.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:40 PM
-1

You're either for mutilating babies or you're not. This is an idiotic statement. How about I turn it around. You're either for protecting male babies from all kinds of medical problems or you're not. Base your opinion on facts and not hyperbole and you will get a better reaction. Sure if your opinion is that you think you have a right to mutilate a baby that is fine by me but then people should be allowed to use your logic on you. I wish you would start using logic instead of fallacies. That wou…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:40 PM
2

To which I triggered Men's Rights. Sorry but you triggered a very very small faction of Men's Rights. If you look you have only been downvoted 6 or 7 times. That is about the extent of this group. The mass majority of the people in this forum keep the subject on men's rights and not on this. You are spot on calling this SJWish and cultish.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:37 PM
-2

The one this cartoon illustrates perfectly. It does not. The Mayo Clinic and the APA have been cited a 100 times on this issue in this forum. You purposely ignore those findings and create a strawman argument to back up your position. If your position is strong and based in science then you would not be making up strawman arguments.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:35 PM
-2

WOW. Your logic here fails. The opinion is not the action. The opinion is if the action should be allowed.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:34 PM
2

This is very common. You must be militant anti-circ or they think you should be in jail. I often wonder what this is really about. What else did these parents do to these guys to make them hate them so much. The Mayo Clinic and the APA both have listed the health benefits of having this done but said that the benefits are not so great as that it should be made universal. This is the exact same opinion I have. It is a good idea to have it done but it should be up to each parent after being given …
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:33 PM
0

"lady"?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 12:30 AM
0

Veganism isn't a gender thing, circumcision is. Actually no. It is a health thing. Its illegal in every civilized country to make even the smallest pinprick of a baby girl's genitals And yet if is forced upon them in many many countries with no health benefits attached to it. This is a gender issue. less destructive than circumcision Not destructive it is constructive as the child's health over its life will be better. Ask the Mayo clinic. cutting a baby boy's dick up is completely legal. So are…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 07:17 PM
1

Circumcision is unethical because it permanently alters the penis and has a negative impact on sex and sexual pleasure. And the Mayo clinic and other top doctors and research centers say that is has health benefits. So sexual pleasure out weighs the benefits of helping to stop spread disease. Perhaps you should look up the word ethical and while your at it the word selfish. Because they have done no study on the long term effects. Except they have. If you talk to just about any doctor outside th…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 02:28 PM
1

HAHAHA ok lets look at this. Ross Anderson is a far left guy who writes for far left blogs and magazines. 2. Since 2012, Aeon has established itself as a unique digital magazine, publishing some of the most profound and provocative thinking on the web. We ask the big questions and find the freshest, most original answers, provided by leading thinkers on science, philosophy, society and the arts. That is except the APA and the Mayo clinic. The actual people who deal with this science. >University…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:44 PM
-1

THE MAYO CLINIC and the American Pediatrics Associations. Two groups that deal with facts on the ground vs a group that deals possibilities, theories and so forth. In fact none of the links he provided actually deal with the heal benefits of circumcision. They deal with the loss of feeling in the penis. Not even part of the discussion. So you can go with a bunch of guys who sit in a office behind computers and post things on the internet and I will trust a the best doctors in the world and the g…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:05 AM
-4

WOW. You are so brain washed I am not sure how you make it through the day. Health benefits. Mayo Clinic and American Pediatrics trump all of those bias quasi-sources you have posted. The National Center for Biotechnology Information. Yep they are so much better than the Mayo Clinic but you know the Mayo Clinic is making billions from circumcision. We are done discussing this because I just do not have debates with misinformed zealots. You are exactly like the the no vaccine crown. Sorry you hat…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:38 AM
1

I laid my argument out pretty well in my first post. you are the one who needed to come back with counters. Not me. Sorry you dont understand how this works. I did however source a lot of information in another reply to another person spreading false narratives. You can go read those if you like. Almost universal acceptance in the medical community about the health benefits of this. it's allowing people to make their own choices because it is a cosmetic choice. This is the false narrative if you…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:13 AM
-6

So may one enquire, do you believe that Female Genital Mutilation is a Human Rights Issue Whilst Male Genital Mutilation is not? I do. They can not be compared. Period. I am sure you will try but they are not the same thing. If you believe they are not Equivalent Human Rights issues, please explain why exactly! One has health benefits and is done for that reason. The other is done for the purpose of subjugating a person. Should not have to explain this. I also wonder, if across the majority of t…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:11 AM
1

The same could be said of female circumcision Ahh just like a wrote. Equivocating the two. They are not in common at all. you're endorsing on helpless male babies. I am not. Perhaps you should go back and read my post. My argument is that this is not a mens rights issue. It is a health issue and I do not care either way. Just like I dont care if you are a vegan. But being a vegan is just as much a men's rights issue as this is. Bodily integrity is a human right true or false? For me to answer th…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 12:31 AM
0

The predictable arguments.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 12:27 AM
-13

I think it is funny that some people on the mensrights sub think that everyone is just supposed to accept that circumcision is a men's rights issue. It is not even close to the same thing as female circumcision and we should stop equivocating the two. There is proven medical research that shows the health benefits of getting circumcised. Now I want to make it very clear that if you choose not to have your child circumcised I have zero problem with it. My suggestion is that if you dont like it yo…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 09:34 PM
1

Hmm I wonder why I am single :)
/r/MensRights18/02/17 10:27 PM
18

Lets turn this around.... Its different because women choose to put themselves in violent situations. What would be the reaction if I anyone made this statement after some woman who was dressed like a poll dancer got drunk at a frat party and then claimed the next day she was raped. Oh wait... I dont have to guess. Just look at the Duke Lacross team and a 1000 other situations that played out exactly like it. The real difference here is that men are expected to take responsibility for their own …
/r/MensRights18/02/17 04:37 PM
1

Its in the divorce decree.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 01:26 PM
3

Pretending everything you dont like or want to do is a microaggression is a macroaggression.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 02:54 PM
2

It is probably possible, but what if she turns on the crocodile tears in the court room. Not if we get the same judge. The last time we were there the judge kicked her out of the courtroom.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 02:24 PM
1

Works out nice for single moms but it is shit for single dads.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 01:55 PM
6

HAHAH sorry. Read it again and I can see how it would. He, as in the guy she was hanging out with.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 01:58 PM
95

Mine actually told me he was gay. When I finally caught them I found out she was sleeping with 7 different guys. She got mad at me and actually said that if I would let her bring the guys over to our house for sex that she wouldnt leave me. I replied. Not going to leave me? You dont get to stay. So now it is just me and my two wonderful kids. And yes they are mine.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:04 PM
7

Wow, Emotional abuse is so funny.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 04:03 PM
7

Been asking this question for years.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 01:52 PM
2

I also get the "Oh Grandpa has his little helpers today" I am 50 with a 7 year old and a 10 year old. That one doesnt bother me as much though.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 12:10 AM
2

I have the same thoughts on this. Their mother does not see them so if I were to go out with someone I would not get to be with them.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 07:20 AM
9

This all entered my mind because of the walmart thing and that I have my first date in 4 years. I was thinking that it must be harder for single dads to date since they have to pay either way. When my wife left and emptied the bank accounts, as I was a stay at home dad, I had not choice but to get a public lawyer to ensure that I received the kid. Every time I went to the office to meet with this lawyer the clerk out front would ask me the name of the woman who was filing the divorce against me.…
/r/MensRights26/11/16 04:03 AM
1

I realized that :)
/r/MensRights09/08/16 01:56 PM
1

I only typed that because the sex was not apparent from the name. "it" might have been better. But I was always taught that if you do not know the gender than type he/she. He/she had a writing style that was very feminine in nature though.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 10:57 PM
1

he/she wanted to bait us to so they could get to the point that we should join the women's movement. That if we truly believed in equal rights than we would be standing arm in arm with the very women who claim we are all rapist. His/her main point was that we just do not understand what feminism is. If we did we would accept it as the proper course. Of course they do this using the book definition of feminism not what feminism really is. Not my first rodeo with these types. I knew from the very …
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:40 PM
5

I thought feminism was about man hating Modern feminism is just that. but academically it's not. Only by definition. If you actually see what is being taught academically it is about man hating. From my studies it hasn't been about blame and punishment or that men are bad people. Then you are not reading their current lesson plans nor their academic writings. I would just like to be heard out if this is the general consensus about what feminism research is? I dont think you do. I think there is …
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:04 PM
6

I think you might purposely trying to bait people on this sub. Your question depends on how you define feminism. If you use the inaccurate academic definition than it is pro-feminism as it is about equal rights for everyone and no one should be discriminated against because of their sex. However, the academic definition of feminism is not the reality of feminism. Modern feminism and what is taught in colleges have little to no resemblance at all to the fight for equal treatment under the law. Th…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 06:44 PM
9

Agree. This guy broke company rules and posted private security photos. I would have fired him too.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 04:05 AM
1

I just occurred to me today at work. Letting her know is the best thing I can do. Much better than one night in jail, a fine from the judge and getting to see the kids the next day.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 01:27 AM
2

She has dropped her insurance so I am getting Medicaid for the kids. I have found miles for smiles which will do their dental for free. So all is good. I have also came up with a great plan for her not to see the kids anymore without me breaking the divorce decree. She now has a warrant for her arrest. She lives in Kansas and I live in Missouri. She would have to come and pick up the kids in Missouri. If I inform her of the warrant and tell her I will call the police on her if I see her in Misso…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 01:20 AM
3

They put out a warrant for her arrest and the officer advise that the next time she comes to pick the kids up to call them. She lives across the border in Kansas.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 12:24 PM
2

Yes that is on the record too.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 12:23 PM
7

The officer called me back a little while ago. Said he needed to ask me some more questions but it was going to be strange. Said he had a list that he was required to ask me but they were all geared for women. I let him ask me them and then at the end he said he is now supposed to offer me the number of a councilor to talk to but that they only had numbers to councilors for women :) I didn't need a councilor.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:50 AM
20

Way back on my first marriage in 1991 I was playing with my wife. We were throwing rolled up news paper at each other. I guess we were a little loud and the neighbors swore they heard her say "stop hitting me." When the police came we kind of laughed about it until they coffed me and took me to jail. They then spent a few hours trying to convince her she was really being abused. The eventually let me out when she convinced them, the next day, that nothing happened. Another story and this one rea…
/r/MensRights15/07/16 02:14 AM
7

Whats bad is this does not happen very often. But I can tell by looking at her when she is have an episode. I could tell when she walked up the sidewalk. Been a few years since she was physical though. Thanks bro.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 02:09 AM
8

I have.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 02:08 AM
2

Yes. They. The ones who use their sex to get extra rights.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 01:29 AM
1

I will not amend my comment. Anyone with a working brain can tell that it was meant to mock the very people who do this kind of thing. The comment causes no harm to anyone and I am going to ask you to act more like a man on the mens rights sub.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 01:13 AM
7

You are probably right.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 10:50 PM
6

That was a joke. Dear lord.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 06:47 PM
13

So we are not about stopping sex discrimination against men? I was serious about getting a lawyer. The rest was just a joke. Posting a picture of it in reddit will not get anything changed.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 05:44 PM
49

Get a lawyer. Thats what they would do. Tell them it triggered you and now you have PTSD.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 04:45 PM
8

Love it when people use the technical definition for feminist instead of the what feminism and feminist really are. There are no feminist groups in the real world that are fighting for equal rights. Not one. Not by their words, actions or what they are taught in school.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 12:38 AM
-1

Wow. You can say volumes with just a picture.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 04:48 PM
1

Yes by population the actual number will be that more white males are in college than black males or Hispanic males. But that is not the point that is being made. The point being made is who is represented proportionately. Does the college campus reflect society. It does not. Black males are over represented and white males are under represented. Period. There is no argument. Without additional data (population size) this data does not allow you to predict demographics of any university. But we …
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:26 PM
-1

You are a complete idiot. Here is your argument. "I dont like the facts so I am going to call you a racist" Men's Rights is about expanding compassion for all men not race baiting white men so they become contemptuous of other races of men. Get with the program. Two things wrong with what you stated here. Men's rights has nothing to do with expanding compassion. It has to do with protecting men's rights. ALL MEN'S RIGHTS. State that a specific group of men are being ignored is not race baiting. …
/r/MensRights27/05/16 06:33 AM
1

Actually I do. The first part of statistics is making sure you are using one that reflects the information you are trying to find. The OP wants to find out if White males are under represented. First thing you need to do is find out how many white males are eligible compared to other groups, such as eligible black males or eligible white females. Taking every single white person and finding out if they are going to college and comparing it to every single other group to see if they are going to …
/r/MensRights27/05/16 06:18 AM
-2

Actually my degree is in avionics systems technology. Not useless at all. Next time maybe you shouldn't throw wild accusations around like that I always believe random guys on reddit. Also this sub isn't about white privilege. This thread is not about white privilege. It is about white male privilege or the myth of it. Since white males are in fact men and this is about men's rights it is on subject to talk about white men's rights. It's about men's rights. Many of which are men who are white an…
/r/MensRights27/05/16 04:59 AM
-3

Please dont be an idiot.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:08 AM
2

But it is inaccurate. The stat should be those eligible for college. When this is added in the numbers for white males goes way down. Black men are about 7 percent of the population and have about a 50% graduation rate. So double that number for the representation of black males. Same goes for Hispanics.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:07 AM
1

It has been supplied. You just dont like it so you are, like most leftist, going to just ignore it and pretend it does not exist. Just going to save some time now and put you on ignore.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:05 AM
-2

You are the one who does not understand. I have tried to explain it to you but you are such a pretentious ass that it is impossible to get past your inadequate education or perhaps your brain washing.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:04 AM
2

He did. His entire point was to state this without stating it so he could come back and be an ass.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:04 AM
2

Your entire post was to try and prove that point. Probably because you are not understanding the original argument. The argument was that white males are the MOST underrepresented. This has been proven over and over in this thread. Perhaps you can go back and start reading from the beginning again. As a group white males who are eligible for college are grossly underrepresented at rates higher than any other group.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:03 AM
3

Do you even reading comprehension. Black males are about 7 percent of the population but and a much lower number when it comes to graduating HS and being eligible for college. So the fact that 33.9 percent are black shows that they are in fact over represented in these statistics. Same goes for Hispanics. When tempered with graduation rates and eligibility is is clear that white males are the group that is at the bottom. Was a nice try monkeying around with the stats to try and prove your inane …
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:00 AM
5

But you must compare that number to only white males. What The argument is that WHITE MALES are under represented. Much less than 47 percent of law schools are populated by white males.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 12:52 AM
0

WOW! Just wow. It proves exactly he point he was trying to prove. Since the argument is white privilege. Sorry about your liberal arts degree in something useless.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 12:50 AM
3

Me too. Hold a door for anyone.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 03:03 AM
4

I always feel strange shaking hands with a woman. Dont know why.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 03:02 AM
27

As long as you put them on a high enough pedestal to look up their dress. Edit: cant take credit for this. It was Steve Martin.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 03:00 AM
2

I have noticed over the past few years that women do not know how to let a man open the door for them. Ladies, if you rush right up to the door we cant get there ahead of you. If you want a door opened for you than position yourself correctly. I realize I set that last sentence up for a joke
/r/MensRights26/02/16 02:59 AM
-1

Nope. He is trying to hijack the thread and make it about his pet little agenda. Until this idiot made this comment |Cool, I'll be sure to cut off my daughter's labias. Edit: How about according to morality? It was a civil and intelligent discussion about feminism and what is considers systemic. At this point I attacked him for what he was the TROLL. You do not feed trolls you put them on ignore. This is not about opposing views this is about an idiot who used an idiot argument, TWICE to advance…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 03:22 AM
1

I am good with regular math. Can do fractions in my head if I have to. But once it gets into algebra I am gone. No chance at all. Being dyslexic causes letters to get exchanged and < > these are impossible to keep straight. Funny thing is. As a history teacher and world traveler I have not once had to use any algebra. Glad I took the class though.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 10:20 PM
-5

no idea what you have written. I told you I put you on ignore. I claimed you are an idiot. This proves it.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:59 PM
-7

You are an idiot. Not sure how you even figured out how to work a computer. There is science that backs up male circumcision. Many adult males are going to get it done today. There is no science that backs up cutting off labias. Since asking you to do research would be a waste of time and there is no way for me to force you to take your meds, I am going to put you on ignore. Stupid debates are for stupid people.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:55 PM
-6

mutilation Opinion not fact. pressing medical need Perhaps you should actually look into this. often done purely for aesthetic reasons. So? So you are also against getting ears piercing until your 18? Many cultures do many things for aesthetic reasons. You are arguments are inane and as always I put people like you on ignore.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:53 PM
1

Thanks for the input. I understand what you mean. Have a great day.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:52 PM
-6

Something done routinely, chopping off useful and enervated skin, usually for purely aesthetic reasons is a neutral or good? What if they chopped off your nose? Ignorant argument. Shows you do not have an open mind and it is a waste of time to even talk with you. So going to just go ahead and put you on ignore.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:51 PM
-5

Not according to science.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:50 PM
2

Have a masters in History and a B.A. in political science. Did great at those. Math? Not so much.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:48 PM
-9

I understand what you are saying but I am looking at it as we are talking about a systemic bad. If I see circumcision as neutral or good than it I am not perceiving it as a something that needs to change. It is easy to say that men not getting custody of their kids equally is bad. It is not as easy to say baby boys being circumcised is bad. And please I am begging you lets not get in an argument about if it it is good or bad. Tons of opinions on both sides of this and there is no clear conclusio…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:23 PM
0

I am very lucky. I got my kids and my ex only sees them once a month for a day. She has some issues....
/r/MensRights22/02/16 05:09 PM
2

Last class I took in college was algebra. I am dyslexic and have adhd, so math was a real problem. I took a class that 50% was homework and 10% was class attendance. Got 100% on the homework and 100% on the class attendance. Just good enough on exams to eek out that D. D = Diploma.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 05:07 PM
-9

Personally I think your argument would be better if the circumcision part were left out but otherwise you are spot on.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 05:06 PM
1

Dear god. People like this exist.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 05:04 PM
2

She did do pretty good on the National Anthem though. If she would just stick to singing.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 12:48 AM
4

With her music.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 05:59 PM
14

What is wrong with these people. So if someone says they were raped we just convict? We have laws for a reason.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 03:05 PM
0

Like I said. "HE" is absolutely correct.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:54 PM
2

And he is absolutely correct.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 12:41 AM
3

This would be funny if it wasnt spot on true.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:01 PM
7

I taught my boys to behave. Teach your daughter not to cry rape because he wouldn't go out with her.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:45 AM
4

They used to call this penis envy.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 10:22 PM
2

You're describing a justice system that does not currently exist, It does not exist because of people like you who want to give different groups different rights that are weighted by where they fall on the "victim" scale. and you continue to ignore my point regarding unprocessed rape kits. I have not. I have addressed it. Go back and read again. Unprocessed rape kits mean nothing. They have no statistical meaning at all. Everyone of them could be a rape, everyone one of them could be a false rap…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:02 AM
2

Do you not think there's some sort of epidemic of false reporting No I do not. Just like I do not think there is an epidemic of rapes. Numbers show that. Do you not think that there's no real problem with rape prosecution in our country? I do not. Except that prosecutes will take cases to trial for rape with less evidence than they would with other crimes. But I see no big problem either way. Rapes that have evidence get convictions. I will quote you here: "I also do not think we have a nation w…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 01:18 AM
2

You have consistently dismissed the testimony of women as being less than credible Not once. I have advocated that the testimony of a women be equal in stature to that of a man. The same, equal. No different. described policies designed to allow women (and men) to report safely and to a sympathetic audience as unjust. Describing policies that take away civil rights. Like facing your accuser, not being held in jail for years without evidence. sympathetic audience Police should not be sympathetic …
/r/MensRights10/12/15 01:16 AM
2

Still using that word victim before a trial has happened.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 01:02 AM
2

Yep. Fuck people who want everyone treated equally under the law. They are the worst. Your second paragraph is too long to quote but what you are saying actually does happen in a theft or any other case that is brought in. Those exact type of questions are asked. Funny you didnt know this. Or maybe you did. Let me pose this to you though. If I went into the police station and said that you personally robbed me and then the police came to interview you. They would ask you questions and look for e…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 12:56 AM
2

Please show where I said they were all liars. Oh you cant. I have asked for the accused and the accuser to be treated equally in the justice system. Since we are going to use a strawman I guess you are against them being treated equally under the justice system.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 12:44 AM
3

As always. the guy who is for real equal rights is out of his mind to the far left crowed. Special rights for the protected classes. White males? Fuck them.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 10:36 PM
3

No, rape victims, male and female, deserve greater attention and social awareness given the nature of their accusations and the alleged violence done to them. Not for an accusation. They deserve no better or worse treatment for an accusation of rape. After a conviction perhaps but not for an accusation. This attention and awareness is to promote a complete and just trial with a verdict on the merits of evidence presented. If you give someone special attention because of their accusation you have…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 10:24 PM
5

In comment to your answers. This is what you are writing now but you are talking about the trial. You have advocated that the women should be believed before the trial even without evidence. This is what I am talking about. Putting a man in jail for years while he waits for a trial and having his name put on trial in the media while the woman is kept secrete. So what you answered here is correct but not what you have advocated. You have aggressively said the opposite. That not only should women …
/r/MensRights09/12/15 10:23 PM
2

The point of highlight past injustice is to demonstrate that the legal community is now aware of how the system was unjust and are taking steps to rectify it when possible. Making it unjust for others is not rectifying it. Treat everyone equally. No one is "privileged" by their prior racial or gendered victimization According to what you wrote they are. Women deserve special rights now because they were treated poorly in the past. hey are instead, as you advocate, treated equally before the law …
/r/MensRights09/12/15 10:03 PM
2

especially in light of centuries of regressive and horribly biased prosecutions So punish people now for crimes of the past. Sounds familiar. which were alternately misogynistic, racist, and misandryist Ahh, there are the words we were all waiting for. Now you have revealed yourself. everything from automatically taking a white woman's word for rape when the accused was black Ok. Now just like all good liberals you have put a rating system in for entomology. So a black man is a more protected cl…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 09:45 PM
3

You've made no attempt to engage with what I'm saying in an intellectually honest way I have no intention in engaging your unintelligent garble that is based in feelings instead of well thought out logic. Thought I made it clear that I have no respect for your thoughts on this as they take away the civil rights of those accused. Did you even know that you are anti-civil rights? Bet you didnt. You've drawn illicit and misleading inferences from my post and are now creating straw men throughout it…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 09:29 PM
2

I didn't say that at all You absolutely advocated it. We must take special care for these cases was what you claimed. I said that they should receive a larger measure of societal solicitude and appreciation for the unique difficulties in reporting the crime. Special rights. How can you say this is not a special right. This is even before a conviction. Before we even know if the person is telling the truth. This does not privilege the victim over the accused Special rights not afforded to other v…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 09:19 PM
10

It's frustrating that this happens Especially when there is no proof it happens. but I have a really hard time blaming the victims when we have a history of favoring men and shaming women in these situations. Yep, you always see the woman's face drug through he media dont you. You also always see those who lie about it go to jail. Oh wait, that's in bizarro world. That may not be the case everywhere, but we do still see it happen[1] . The fact that you use "Think Progress" as a source for anythi…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 09:07 PM
7

Completely disagree. Rape victims should not be given special rights as we are all supposed to be protected equally under the law. If you are going to show the accused's face than you should have to show the accusers face. No preferential treatment should be given out because of "feelings" there is very little, if anything, more dehumanizing and less dignified than being raped Being accused of it when you did not do it comes to mind. Especially when your face is drug through the media and the ac…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 09:05 PM
7

I said what I meant. There is very little room for interpretation. My comments are directed to the use of lightning as an example. No one asked to be hit by lighting but many people make it a lot easier for lightning to hit them. Lightning will follow the least difficult path. If you make yourself the least difficult path than you should not be surprised when you are hit. Once we find out this path we put up precautions to divert the lightning but then we also educate the person who was being st…
/r/MensRights09/12/15 09:01 PM
6

Well that part was a given.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:56 PM
1

This of course assumes that all reported rape cases are true and beyond question.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 06:17 PM
10

Well if they stand under a tree with a golf club during a lightning storm, forever.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 06:16 PM
-2

actually it wasnt. In English we read this to mean that their is a wage gap and it is the fault of the women that it exist. While I agree with the sentiment of the meme it actually agrees that a gap exist. No wage gap exist.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:01 AM
10

Many real scientist would disagree. However, major in what ever you want. Just dont bitch when you are working at a low paying job. Using you as a catch all and not you specifically.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:26 AM
1

Do they still give you the stink-eye when they take your order at the fast food restaurant?
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:25 AM
-3

This is even funnier since there is no wage gap.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:24 AM
1

Because she was the founder. She is currently a poster girl for feminist. I am not sure I follow you. This is the first line of the post... MS feminist and founder of PP. This is just who she is. If it was written MS feminist and then nothing else than someone would not know who she is. Just some random feminist at a KKK rally. Let me give you an example. This is Sir Edmond Hillary, outdoor enthusiast. This is Sir Edmond Hillary, outdoor enthusiast and first person to climb Mt. Everest. I do not…
/r/MensRights21/10/15 01:52 AM
2

You are mixing issues. Planned Parenthood(PP) is one of many groups that provides abortions and not support PP or pointing out that it was founded on racist principles has nothing to do with a person support or nonsupport of abortion. I believe the point here is to show that a hero of the feminist movement was a big racist, as many were. As for MRA's support for PP, each man would have his own ideas on the issue and there is no stance on it either way. It is a different issue.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 01:42 AM
1

with the real stats.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:08 PM
1

I am sorry overlords. Please do not punish me again :)
/r/MensRights05/09/15 06:54 PM
1

Seems so.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 06:53 PM
7

Sorry. White male. The most evil thing on the planet and denied all rights or the ability to defend themselves.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 01:00 PM
6

Male is the new black :)
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:54 PM
14

Let see. Is that not profiling? Middle age white male talking to a 12 year old. Must be a child molester. Or perhaps he needed to know where the grocery store was.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:52 PM
-1

Dont trigger me.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 06:31 PM
-1

Which questions are we not allowed to ask? Oh shit did I just ask a question? Crap! did I do it again? I think I will just leave now if that is ok? I give up. :)
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:27 PM
0

Good info. Thanks
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:26 PM
8

I think you misunderstand what I was saying. I think every single thing this guy in this video said is true. Women feel entitled. They expect to be treated in a way that they are not willing to treat men. These women on this video are the extreme of an ideology that does in fact permeate what is being taught to all women. My point was that the media is causing the problem and causing women to believe this tripe. Like unequal pay. A lie that has been debunked over and over. Like an imaginary war …
/r/MensRights19/08/15 05:09 AM
20

The worst part is that so very few women actually believe in this shit but the media represents it as mainstream and common.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 12:53 AM
2

Probably a good idea to do both. You know some people have mental problems that make it impossible to teach them not to do bad things. Added to this we should teach our young women that regret is not rape. My daughter is learning to respect herself, respect others, treat other like she would like to be treated and how to protect herself from those who are not taught the same or not capable of doing the same. Guess what I teach me son? The exact same thing.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 11:59 PM
0

NP. Like I said. These people will pretend they dont understand what you are trying to say and will be purposely obtuse. It is a tactic they use often.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:57 PM
0

I think you misunderstood. I was on your side and I was talking about their ideology. I was saying that I understood what you were trying to say with the funny picture and the person who was pretending not to understand had an agenda.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:42 AM
-1

Give up. These kinds of people are so deep into their ideology that nothing can deter them. Best to just ignore them. I understood your point and anyone without some agenda would.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:50 AM
1

I know. This would be a good thing.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 01:44 PM
9

It is very hard to sue a school. He looked into it. That is the problem though. A school can pretty much kick you out for anything they want. No proof is needed. It was a private school and your enrollment can be canceled at anytime. He was not even there for the hearing. So when he returned and presented his evidence, passport and phone msg, it was too late. He had been kicked out. The rules of the school where that tribunal decisions were final and no appeals were allowed. Once a student was k…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:28 AM
11

I had a friend kicked out of college for a reported rape. At the time his "ex-girlfriend" reported it he had been out of the country on an exchange program for almost a year. He was not even in the country at the time she reported that he raped her. He even had a voice msg on his phone where she threatened to get him kicked out. None of this matter.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:16 AM
1

It happens slowly. You dont even realize it. Like the frog in the boiling water analogy.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:30 AM
8

EDIT: please do not take the following as an insult to you as it is not intended to be so. I am passionate about this issue though. This might not be popular, but I don't think it's bad to spend more time addressing violence from men in the media, because statistically it happens more often than violence from women And this kind of add is what makes you believe this. It is not true. http://www.saveservices.org/2012/02/cdc-study-more-men-than-women-victims-of-partner-abuse/ You are exactly what t…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:12 AM
21

No it does not. Women and men who both do X get paid the same. Men who do X and women who do Y get paid differently.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 11:18 PM
56

They do not want equal pay. They already have it. This is to set up a political narrative to get other concessions and fire up base voting groups.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 11:17 PM
113

I think the argument can even go farther. If a woman is not responsible for her decisions when she has had to much to drink (sex) than citizens should not be responsible for deciding to drive once they are drunk. Sober Sober = not rape Sober drunk = rape Drunk drunk = not rape
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:24 AM
1

You would have to have an honest media report about the truth of the myth of the wage gap. Not going to happen. It goes against their narrative. Sad really that they cause so many women to feel as if they are being mistreated. Can not be good for their self-esteem. So I guess the media has a war on women.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:57 PM
-1

Pathetic. Get help.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 10:11 PM
0

Sorry meant pro-choice. Name the health benefits that mean that it is better to get it done from a young age, without consent, that from an older age with consent. You already know the answer to this. If not than you are just a troll who knows nothing of the issue. So either do some research or stfu.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 09:59 PM
-1

And I am not "militant" on the issue Your comments show otherwise. is one of many issues on which I have strong beliefs Militant ones that which is irrational, misinformed, and at odds with what is just. Irrational = subjective Misinformed = not true. Volumes of medical journals and studies talk about circ being a good thing. Just = subjective. If you were to research the matter you would learn that medical benefits are either non-existent or greatly exaggerated. I have studied the matter and yo…
/r/MensRights21/06/15 06:47 PM
-4

So I guess you would be ok with labeling a pro-choice person as being pro-murder. You militant anti-circ guys are pathetic. Sorry you hate your mommy and daddy but circ has all kinds of great medical benefits. That's just a fact. Perhaps some counseling with mom and dad would help you. Edit: pro-choice
/r/MensRights21/06/15 06:24 PM
1

Then we can reform or dismantle Title IX Amen
/r/MensRights03/06/15 01:33 AM
2

Virginity as a concept is a natural extension of biology. Almost all creatures try to ensure that their genetic code is passed on. Thus many strategies evolved to ensure that only one genetic code was passed on. One that evolved in humans was the concept of virginity. If no other man had deposited sperm inside the female than the male was ensured the all offspring was his. As for the female side of things. They evolved to look for certain clues as to if the males sperm would create viable offspr…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 10:22 PM
1

That is a very well done poster.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:19 PM
4

This is how all arguments should end. Next time include a picture though.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 03:03 AM
5

I thought feminist already had bad haircuts?
/r/MensRights28/11/14 09:47 PM
2

Exactly. Basicly we are told do what the women says at all times.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 02:41 AM
4

Just wow. So the following would get me kicked of school. I do not want to have sex with you because I am angry with you and I do not feel like being intimate or close to you tonight. Only a stupid person would kiss my best friend with me standing there. (she keeps trying) I yell: NO MEANS NO. I dont care about your feelings for me right now you kissed my friend and I do not approve of that kind of thing. If you thought I would be ok with it you are crazy. I do not want to cuddle and I do not ca…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 10:46 PM
0

Spanking is poor parenting Opinion. but it doesn't mean a child will end up violent This was the the other persons argument. Not mine. Mine is that the mass majority of kids who are spanked will not grow up violent. It's probably the laziest form of parenting Again you are stating opinion. Fear and violence is how things are done? Of course not. A million years of human history would disagree.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 03:13 AM
1

Wow. Someone has an agenda. If your theory held true all people who were spanked would be violent. The mass majority of them are not. Your theory is busted. Sorry you had a bad childhood but not everyone had crappy parents like you. Bet you blame them for everything. No need to reply as I do not feel like having a 3rd grade argument with someone who thinks like a 3rd grader. I will be putting you on my ignore list so I never have to see any tripe posted by you again. Watch, you will probable sti…
/r/MensRights03/08/14 12:36 AM
9

A wave is whatever the current far left woman's movement says it is. They have strayed so far from what feminism is and should be that they have to describe their beliefs as waves. In fact they are not feminist at all and should not be using the term.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 11:27 PM
4

I will take feminism more seriously when the current women who pretend they are feminist stop calling themselves a word that does not define what they really are. A true feminist believes in equal rights for all sexes and that neither women nor men are inherently evil or need to need to be punished. To say that you someone's writing is amateur because they do not cite the person you want them to cite is childish. NA NA NA I wont listen to you because... You have to regurgitate whatever fad study…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 11:26 PM
1

Still waiting for you to prove me wrong. Citations? Sources? Anything other than the hate you spewed out? No. I didn't think so. Have to punish those evil men for forcing those poor girls to get pregnant. Ok. So that was strike one. Two more chances to give me some sources.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:24 PM
0

stop engaging in emotional hyperbole This would be you in a nut shell. At any rate, there's nothing wrong with considering the actual consequences to any given action - in this case it would result in the necessity for more government support of either single mothers or children given up for adoption, which in the end would mean we'd all be paying more anyway. So, externalizing risk and privatizing reward. Citations needed of studies done on this. You have absolutely no proof of this. In fact a …
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:15 PM
0

So basically your argument is that men should have no rights at all. If you have to retool the welfare system than do it. Protect everyone's rights not just one group. It could actually cause less single mothers. A study would have to be done. Faced with the knowledge that they will never get child support from the father they might decide to go ahead and have the abortion. Why the fuck not? It should be as prohibitively expensive as abortion is for some women. Because you either believe in equa…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:07 PM
1

I have stated this idea before. The only difference I would put in is that it should be for half the price of an abortion.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:04 PM
1

My wife worked up until the day she gave birth.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:03 PM
1

I think it's unreasonable to allow somebody WHO KNEW ABOUT THE PREGNANCY to bail on it at that late date Unless they are a woman?
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:03 PM
2

I have advocated this for years.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:01 PM
3

Correct. A friend of mine was kicked out of school because a former girlfriend accused him of rape. She had dates and everything. Only problem was that the entire time she said this was going on he was in Germany with his national guard unit. He had papers, pictures and testimony to prove it. Did not matter. She said it so it must have happened. He was kicked out and had a very hard time getting into another school. The girl? She did the same thing to two other guys and finally dropped out.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter