TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

contractor808 Archive

View 26 posts and 1,797 comments by contractor808 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
200

Activism/Supportcontractor808/r/MensRights02/11/17 04:36 PM
127

Discriminationcontractor808/r/MensRights10/04/17 07:50 PM
59

Social Issuescontractor808/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:00 PM
53

Activism/Supportcontractor808/r/MensRights16/03/17 06:21 PM
34

Edu./Occu.contractor808/r/MensRights29/05/17 05:07 PM
31

contractor808/r/MensRights03/03/17 02:51 PM
29

contractor808/r/MensRights20/01/17 02:18 AM
27

Activism/Supportcontractor808/r/MensRights21/12/16 05:48 PM
24

Activism/Supportcontractor808/r/MensRights19/12/16 09:23 PM
23

contractor808/r/MensRights12/02/17 03:30 PM
22

Intactivismcontractor808/r/MensRights16/08/17 12:55 AM
22

Social Issuescontractor808/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:31 PM
21

Legal Rightscontractor808/r/MensRights03/08/17 01:30 AM
15

contractor808/r/MensRights22/02/17 04:06 PM
14

contractor808/r/MensRights01/01/17 07:24 PM
14

Edu./Occu.contractor808/r/MensRights18/01/17 01:19 AM
11

Edu./Occu.contractor808/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:50 PM
10

contractor808/r/MensRights26/01/17 01:02 AM
9

contractor808/r/MensRights18/01/17 12:26 AM
6

Activism/Supportcontractor808/r/MensRights24/12/16 02:03 AM
6

Generalcontractor808/r/MensRights31/07/17 05:11 AM
4

contractor808/r/MensRights07/02/17 04:49 AM
4

contractor808/r/MensRights25/10/16 11:02 PM
3

contractor808/r/MensRights05/12/16 11:17 PM
1

Activism/Supportcontractor808/r/MensRights14/04/17 04:47 AM
1

Activism/Supportcontractor808/r/MensRights07/03/17 06:22 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,797 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

LOL
/r/MensRights15/05/18 05:24 AM
1

Once we are poor again like third world countries (the ultimate goal of the globalist Left) we will be like Bangladesh and India where almost half of IT grads are women. A good number of those are just for advertising/raising social status in the marriage market. They do not intend to actually use those degrees.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 05:23 AM
4

Every woman who applies for federal student aid and is accepted did so without having to sign up for the draft. Limited placements are being given to women who leave the profession. Negative social effects aside, it's not an economically prudent way to use resources especially when women take taxpayer money to study degrees that do not provide a net financial return even if they stay in the field (gender studies, cultural anthropology, racial studies, etc)
/r/MensRights15/05/18 05:20 AM
3

Indeed. The simple disparity in interest will affect only a minority of women if there is bans/etc regarding sex bots.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 05:17 AM
1

Depends. You agree to their terms of use when opening an account.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 05:13 AM
1

Females have re-established a sexual dynamic via education and birth control that strongly favors their reproductive strategies again after centuries of repression. Repression is a bit of a misrepresentation. It's not like it was only women who were suppressing sexual tendencies. The promotion of chastity was linked with a highly controlled courtship, which much more explicitly locked certain groups/races/classes of men out of the dating market. Not to mention there were enormous practical consi…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 05:12 AM
2

A lot of men don't like prostitutes because they know they're having sex for money. Men want to be loved just like any other human being. On the contrary, men enjoy prostitutes because they provide intimacy. Many are happy to run the clock for a conversation.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 05:00 AM
3

In fact, I believe it is the deviation from Traditional Conservatism which enables feminism. How would you explain the fact that Feminism began and flourished over a hundred years ago when society was very much more traditionally conservative and religiously conservative? The quoted author, Bax, was writing on this topic since the late 1800s and was not the first to notice the influence of Feminism.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 04:53 AM
2

Good point. Dives and fake fouls are already standard. Adding that nonsense on top would be an easy way to manipulate matches and opposing team rosters.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:57 PM
2

Good talk overall. Some of the more blue pill parts are overshadowed by the very frank discussion on certain topics.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:54 PM
2

Thank you. It always irks me when people say how things were so different "back in the day."
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:52 PM
9

This will only lead to more men learning to never date a feminist. *women, they don't have to be feminist to take advantage of such a law.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:50 PM
7

If you think this won't lead to problems, then you are extremely naive. The boy scouts do cool stuff because boys do cool stuff. The girl scouts didn't because the girls and their parents didn't push hard enough to do cool stuff. Those same families will now come over to the scouts. Now, the scouts will have a group of boys doing cool stuff, and a group of girls trying to do cool stuff with the lames from girl scouts complaining the whole time. Inevitably, the "cool" girls in the will conflict w…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:48 PM
2

There will be a jury re-trial. It's not over and done with.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:41 PM
5

She was charged with "aggravated sexual assault", not statutory rape. And it could have been 24 years, but the terms were ordered served concurrently.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:41 PM
5

Idaho and Georgia don't legally recognize women as rapists due to definitions of rape in those states. This case is more of an add-on.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:35 PM
3

Quite a few, but it also depends on what those specific phrases mean in each jurisdiction. "Joint custody by default" may not be as simple as written in law. In Florida, they tried to pass "default presumption of shared custody" which means that the starting point for negotiation is equal access.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:34 PM
1

We?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 08:27 PM
1

That's a very ignorant comment. Groups do exist, they are active. However, in contrast with "women's groups" (aka ideologically motivated feminists), there isn't large scale social and political support for men's issues at this time. Look into the "protests" at Warren Farrell's speaking event in Canada for an example of how men's issues are received (poorly), what punishment there was (none), and what pushback there was from society at large (none). And that's just from Warren who is by all acco…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:43 PM
3

One a pill is taken, it can't be "un-taken". Condoms can be removed by either party during the act.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:37 PM
3

One must admit they were shopping for a denial.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:37 PM
21

Front page titles mention feminism 3 times out of 27. One references a declared feminist stepping down from head of prosecutions, which is a really good thing considering she presided over numerous frivolous and damaging rape prosecutions.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:35 PM
10

It's pretty important when NOW lobbies against shared parenting and alimony reform. Not something that can be ignored.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:25 PM
12

Although known for some time, it's good to see they didn't just abandon the research after previous results.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 04:11 PM
2

This is good news of course, but it's only one of many more steps to go. There's easily months/years left in this case so nothing has really changed at this point.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 04:00 PM
3

No idea really. Given that registration is required for federal student aid/employment, it's not as simple as just draft related matters.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 03:58 PM
1

If you search the Health and Human Services data, bio fathers are less likely than boyfriends/girlfriends.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 06:00 AM
1

Wouldn't that explanation suggest a person is more prone to harm/kill a child by just being in proximity? That's a very dim view of human morality.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 05:58 AM
1

Now Cornton Vale, which is seen as outdated and unfit for its purpose, is to be demolished and a new prison built on it site with room for 80 of Scotland's more dangerous women who are seen as presenting a danger to the public and need to be held in more secure conditions. Ms Hotchkiss said its name would be changed as too many "bad images and bad experiences" were linked with it. I wonder what in the hell it is they're trying to cover up. If it isn't abuse of inmates, it's the inmate data itsel…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 10:58 PM
4

I don't think it does really, but these kinds of posts are upvote bait and there's about 170k subscribers.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 10:54 PM
2

Because some of them are, all of them are that's how this goes right? You would have a point if the leaders, founders, and lobby organizations were Nazis. They are not. However, in feminist history, the major leaders and organizations were, and are, deeply anit-male and often violent (as I described in my previous comment). Susan Brownmiller, Andrea Dworkin, and Elizabeth Candy Stanton were all extremely hateful toward men. The National Organization of Women, The League of Women Voters, and The …
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:14 PM
2

Immutable means "cannot be changed". That will change the context of what you read. Second, the premise is that women are selfish (as stated by the original posters you say you've seen). Therefore, in support of that idea, I presented evidence that very, very few women are publicly supportive of men's issues, demonstrate to support the issues, or are politically active to change those issues. Conversely, they are very active in supporting their own issues, even when those "issues" result in disc…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:10 PM
0

Honestly, she did a very nice thing to let him have sex with her even if she wasn't into it. A lot of women find, as Betina Arndt has said in her dating/sex counseling, that starting sex often gets them in the mood after it's happening and both people can enjoy themselves. Unfortunately, she had to be shitty and call it a "violation"
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:06 PM
31

Try contacting: Mike at j4mb (Justice For Men And Boys) https://j4mb.org.uk/ https://www.fathers-4-justice.org/ Julia Smart: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5201583/barrister-reveals-how-she-sifted-through-40000-texts-until-she-found-gold-dust-4am-message-that-cleared-student-of-rape/ Mark Bagshaw: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/man-falsely-accused-of-sexually-assaulting-actress-feels-like-he-has-undergone-mental-torture-a6867366.html
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:02 PM
13

The right not to pay for a child conceived via rape.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:57 PM
1

Feminism didn't give women that. Industrial/technological/medical development did. And who were the scientists that created those innovations...?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:56 PM
2

Ehhhh it's not that simple. Many things that are currently in favor of women will definitely seem like removing rights when fixed. Alimony reductions, child support changes, fairness in divorce law, will get huge pushback for the "poor women." Integrating/eliminating government sponsored women-only programs, grants, business loans, etc. will all seem like women are losing something. Even if it's a move toward a more equal society legally, it will for sure be framed as an "attack on women."
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:54 PM
2

Feminism is a movement to empower women. Does it empower women to uphold permanent alimony or only give child custody to women? The National Organization of Women seems to think so. How much did the bombings carried out by the suffragettes empower women? Does it empower women to hide male victims of DV and rape in order to skew public policy away from helping those victims?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:48 PM
4

It's okay to call out toxic feminism since it absolutely does exist Were you aware the suffragettes were literal terrorists who bombed churches, businesses, and the homes of politicians? If not, perhaps you should consider that feminism is much more toxic than you think and has been for over 100 years.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:44 PM
7

Well, I'll be the devil's advocate since people take any criticism of women as "hateful." Do women or do they not abuse laws designed to advantage them over men? In child support/alimony? In child custody? In domestic abuse charges? In government aid/loans/grants? In education law (Title IX)? Why hasn't there been any women's protests, marches, or public movements to reduce discrimination of men? Where is the pushback from women against other women? How many women's marches have occurred demandi…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:36 PM
1

You are correct that many of the issues are preexisting and in some ways inherent to human culture broadly speaking. The MRM does understand this as a natural phenomenon to an extent and not just as a feminist invention. It is discussed as the concept "gynocentrism." If you mean to say that a tiny, tiny percent of men have certain jobs contradicts the vast majority of men not doing that great relative to women, then I think you're incorrect. Almost nobody, regardless of sex, are Nobel winners. A…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:23 PM
6

Tucker also interviewed Ivanka Trump regarding her Women in STEM garbage and brought up similar points. I wonder if that was a precursor to this series.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:17 PM
5

lol we beat the_donald! We should be very proud of ourselves given how much people hate that sub. What a dumb "study."
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:13 PM
3

The concept of "Men's Death Day" is also circulating once in a while to illustrate the gap between men and women's workplace deaths.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 10:10 PM
2

I wonder if you technically count as being impoverished at that point based on whatever screwy guidelines they could think up.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 10:11 PM
2

Also the fact that most right-wing politicians do not have a spine to stand up for themselves so they will get bullied into things. Couldn't agree more.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 10:09 PM
2

The economy seems to be doing relatively well though. GDP growth is higher than expected (or said to be possible at all by certain people). Even after the horror on metal tariffs things seem to be going back to what they were.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 10:09 PM
1

Trump is extreme even compared to the Tea Party. In what ways? I'm not aware of "extreme" republicans who would offer DACA amnesty or bring up increases in gun control. He's basically done either what Reagan did (such as with taxes, regulations) or exactly what he said he'd do during the campaign.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 10:06 PM
1

I would point you to the "It's Okay To Be White" posters. A very reasonable statement in its own context is interpreted as any number of bigotries and the overreaction does a whole lot to discredit the people pulling their hair out over a poster.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 10:03 PM
0

As a someone who voted for Bernie in the primary, there's no chance. He's been bought out a long time ago, and now that his wife is under investigation and he had to pay his election fines he's done for.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:58 PM
0

lol what is this a Captain Planet cartoon?
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:56 PM
1

Conservatism is always open to converts ;)
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:55 PM
1

I wouldn't rate the success of multiculturalism based on entertainment. That's an extremely shallow measure of progress compared to crime, welfare usage, or the effect on civil rights laws. And the former is certainly suffering in Canada (and the US) due to the influence of cultural relativism and being "tolerant."
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:53 PM
3

I don't think they would. The rhetoric of early feminists was just as anti-male as it is today.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:49 PM
2

the US political party that most openly supports Feminism has the majority of the female vote, despite the self-reporting rate of being Feminist below 20%. what women's march exists to support the rights of men? To end alimony? To change child custody laws? Logically speaking, how could such wide-reaching laws and regulation be passed without the notice and, at minimum tacit, support of women? if white knights and "soyboys" will always be there to enable them, why would women ever stop taking mo…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:49 PM
1

no professor likes her You say that like it's a bad thing.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:44 PM
1

Depends on what you want out of education and whether you think the federal government has a role.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:42 PM
11

Good for Germany. Too bad the same can't be said for Canada.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:41 PM
1

The article doesn't say why people are going after him. I would suggest it's because he has the "wrong" politics and thanked America in his speech.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:40 PM
1

First photo is a bikini pic. Of course.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:46 PM
2

I think hitbox.tv still runs. (Nvm that domain redirects to smashcast now)
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:57 AM
3

Twitch is open to a wide age range and many are too young. If they were older they'd probably do that, or more likely pay cam girls.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:56 AM
1

Another school had issues with this and had to make changes. Sorry I can't remember, but perhaps College Fix has an article on it.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:54 AM
2

MRAs haven't actually done anything that can be remotely deemed 'violent' especially from a legal standpoint. Not to other people anyhow. There was that guy that lit himself on fire.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 08:01 PM
1

Whatever it once was, the SPLC is now just a propaganda outfit for the identitarian wing of the Democratic Party. An article was written on this topic: A Demagogic Bully
/r/MensRights26/02/18 08:00 PM
3

It is an attack on their religious freedom. It's just that we don't think they should have that freedom to perform genital cutting on infants. And they do make that argument in terms of FGM but those aren't magnified in the same way by the media. MGM is socially accepted in many places, but FGM is more like an uncomfortable truth for certain people and it gets buried.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:45 PM
12

That article is from last September. At least pull something more recent like Ivanka's interview with Tucker Carlson about BS women in STEM stuff.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:37 PM
1

That's a very cursory analysis of the subject. For example: In this phase...much of the movement's energy was focused on passing the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution guaranteeing social equality regardless of sex. That's not entirely true. Labor Feminists and Traditional Conservative women were directly opposed to and eventually defeated the ERA because it removed special protections for women. Ever since, the ERA has been either forgotten entirely by "women's groups" or watered down b…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:31 PM
1

Warren Ferrell was formerly a board member of New York's National Organization for Women. Nobody has good enough credentials. They blacklisted him decades ago and he's at the very least highly associated with the MRM.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 05:22 PM
17

Ms. Steal Yo Man
/r/MensRights30/01/18 07:10 PM
9

Poaching is a good choice of words.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 07:10 PM
10

an accusation is enough. That's kind of the problem...
/r/MensRights30/01/18 07:07 PM
1

Covertly? They made a spectacle of allowing girls in their organization...
/r/MensRights28/01/18 02:33 PM
0

Depends. The UK bans disclosure of complainants names like in the Mark Pearson case. Anything on his accuser was published abroad.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 02:26 PM
0

Germany prosecutes people for wrong think on social media. You picked a bad example of a trustworthy state.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 02:24 PM
1

They'll never run out of tax money.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 02:13 PM
1

Looking at pictures is a poor substitute for real life situations or even measuring a person's state of mind.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 02:11 PM
3

Fucking lol
/r/MensRights28/01/18 02:05 PM
4

Not a surprise. This is the same jurisdiction that allowed catcalling to be reported as a hate crime.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 01:54 PM
5

You don't understand what the word fair means.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 01:53 PM
11

People too triggered by Trump to celebrate a sitting US president saying he isn't a Feminist... it's a big deal people.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 01:45 PM
1

I think it may be a case of schadenfreude if the person in question "champions women" then gets shit on in court. Like an anti-gay politician being caught sucking dicks or a pro-islam campaigner being attacked by terrorists.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 04:42 PM
1

What are the user demos of Spotify? Could be simple pandering.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 04:32 PM
8

To be clear, you're presenting a choice between a person with and without proper hygiene. That's entirely separate from intact or not. Might as well ask if you'd rather go down on a normal smelling vagina or one that smells of rotten meat.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 04:25 PM
1

They are organizations and have websites. I was able to contact the person running J4MB directly easily via email.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 04:46 PM
0

Congratulations, you've figured out Peterson. He's not so enlightened as people make him out to be. You should hear the backwards stuff he says about porn.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 03:51 AM
2

Contact Justice for Men and Boys (J4MB) or Fathers4Justice. Maybe they can forward you to someone who can help.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 03:48 AM
1

You should be able to file for adjustments, but that costs money and you have to have a reason deemed "good enough" I would think.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 03:46 AM
1

Good news is those shows will crash and burn since their headed by crooks and losers.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 03:43 AM
1

Depends on the subject really.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 03:40 AM
1

Public art is a convenient way of paying friends with taxpayer money. They're fucking crooks.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:46 PM
1

They do, but change their mind. NHS is having GP shortages and specialist shortages because women docs aren't meeting demand on hours worked or programs of study while employed. Then drop out the workforce to have kids/after getting pregnant. The earnings gap exists for a reason. Women don't have to work if they make particular choices and aren't rated on wealth. So the vast majority don't focus on career. It's unnecessary.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:39 PM
0

Come now, outside of his interview formats he references his material. It not hard to check on.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 08:04 PM
1

I have only heard of one small group of women deliberately formed to reform alimony and numerous to retain it. Where have you gotten this idea that women are at the forefront? Look at the scenario in Florida where three women's lobby groups fought reform multiple years in a row. (NOW, League of Women Voters, a Jewish women's group)
/r/MensRights09/01/18 07:56 PM
1

You say that, but I also remember reading that worker protection started after textile mill fires and related incidents aka women dieing at work. Previous to that there had been mine disasters with little response.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 05:17 PM
1

Phillips is a well known Feminist troll, to put it nicely, so OP probably relished the chance to further publicize her bad behaviors.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 05:11 PM
2

Look up teen sexting cases or teen "child pornography" cases. That should put you on the right path.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 05:03 PM
92

Yup!
/r/MensRights09/01/18 04:45 PM
4

Title IX is being reformed.
/r/MensRights06/01/18 05:16 PM
1

You exaggerate. The article says he only texted one other person.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:28 PM
1

I like AVFM and Paul Elam. They're the crustier side the MRM needs in order to turn heads and wake up the guys on their 5th marriage.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:20 PM
6

Yes, the League of Women Voters is a political group. They lobbied alongside NOW to defeat shared parenting/alimony reform legislation. The donation is just for PR to try and make them seem better.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:12 PM
7

Depends on how the scouts are classified. Private organizations have different rules than a comedy club that provides public accommodation. In terms of viewpoint, I wouldn't care either way as long as it's not paid for via taxes.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:09 PM
0

You don't pay attention. Look at African conflicts and conflicts in eastern Europe. Large scale ethnic cleansing of men. It has happened.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:06 PM
1

https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/research-projects-and-surveys/miscellaneous/15-year-study/chap4.pdf
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:05 PM
7

Happened in Australia already with these spaces, hopefully it isn't repeated. Seems it's gotten to a level by which its established, but who knows.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:02 PM
25

Look at the sources posted there and in the comments and decide for yourself.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 05:59 PM
7

Free education subsidizes worthless programs of study like Gender Studies.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 05:59 PM
33

It seems it depends on what you think the purpose of school is. Compliance and punctuality are not academic subjects. They are things that should be taught by parents, and I suppose some people believe that the school is the proper place to raise children rather than educate them.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 05:57 PM
1

Is 2.5 years a standard sentence for murder?
/r/MensRights23/12/17 05:07 PM
1

Narcissism. Crying works for them to get things done. They can't imagine what it's like for men.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 05:04 PM
2

Can you go a single comment without blaming the "right wing" or capitalism?
/r/MensRights23/12/17 05:01 PM
2

Immigrant is a race neutral term. They replied that immigrants will likely not be on BC or come from cultures that do not take part in family planning.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 04:55 PM
7

It's very convenient that any money put into the hands of a mother can be justified as "for the children" despite literally zero accountability on how it's spent.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 04:27 PM
1

If you make the money, you should have it in your account.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 01:55 AM
3

It's not the college's responsibility to handle sexual assault in the first place. Students who went to admins thinking it would do something are dumb. That's what the flipping police are for. You don't want to be near some one? File a restraining order. Everything needed already exists with established protections.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 01:48 AM
1

Too long enough holy crap.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:57 PM
1

I think you read the title in reverse. The MoJ is not banning sexual history evidence from the defense under current guidelines.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:56 PM
1

The Mine Safety and Health Administration has asked for public comments on whether standards "could be improved or made more effective or less burdensome by accommodating advances in technology, innovative techniques, or less costly methods." "Because of the carcinogenic health risk to miners from exposure to diesel exhaust, MSHA is requesting information on approaches that would improve control of diesel particulate matter and diesel exhaust," the agency said. Hardly a "threat".
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:53 PM
1

For argument sake, what's the difference between systematic horrible racism and systematic horrible sexism? Which atrocities performed upon Jews has not at some point been done to a group of exclusively men?
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:19 AM
1

It's decipherable language, but still translates to bollocks.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:06 AM
2

Please stop giving her attention. Just let her fade away for heaven's sake.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:05 AM
3

As I understand many, if not all, use CS debt as a full reimbursement for prior welfare spending.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 07:02 AM
2

If disparate outcomes were reliant on racism, ethnic women would have incarceration rates similar in relative severity to ethnic men, and ethnic women would have significantly worse sentencing outcomes that white, which isn't the case. Evidence of racial disparity is primarily present in minority men in drug cases. Evidence of sex disparity is present almost across the board.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 06:56 AM
3

Lol you'd have a hell of a time reading about consent in video games/vr
/r/MensRights14/12/17 06:48 AM
8

Happened in CA to a DJ as well.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 06:46 AM
2

Jade Hatt didn't even after appeal.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 06:44 AM
1

And doctors are held responsible in what way?
/r/MensRights14/12/17 06:32 AM
8

Capable, yes, as statistically likely, no. Fathers are among the lowest reported perps of child maltreatment per annual health and human services data.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 06:31 AM
2

Look up Dr Donald Dutton speech to Canadian Senate
/r/MensRights14/12/17 06:24 AM
2

This post in and of itself isn't a reason, but it's mildly entertaining.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 10:21 PM
1

Could be a lark, but telling someone to destroy a recording is well within the lunacy of these people.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 10:19 PM
1

If this is a broad statement, not all-inclusive, what of those women who do not lose attractiveness over time? If you know I'm speaking in generalities, then why try to pick exceptions to the trend to try and discredit what I'm saying? Just because there are a few couples where the man is shorter doesn't legitimize that as a trend. And there aren't any women who don't lose attractiveness over time. Youth is valued in women, and it shows in their appearance. That's why cosmetic surgery in women i…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 10:16 PM
1

But when you compare white women to black women, the same is true. Black women have it better than men but worse than white women. Do you have a source on that? A ten-year US Sentencing Commission study found that white/black/hispanic women had very close outcomes, with hispanics above whites slightly iirc They went as far as to state that the racial effects were almost entirely born by men, and largely exclusive to drug offenses.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:39 AM
10

The bots themselves, perhaps not, but the collective temper tantrum from certain groups of women will have an impact. And I expect it will backfire on them greatly.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:37 AM
0

I thought it was Einstein and when he said it everyone clapped?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:33 AM
6

Do you oppose the idea of a young person, male or female, spending the first ~30 years of their life on self-development? If you consider the topic in terms of how attractiveness between the sexes works, then it depends on which sex. Broadly speaking, women lose attractiveness over time while men gain it. In a "sexual marketplace" context, it's in a woman's best interest to use that time-limited resource to snag an older man. Then the later years can be spent on schooling etc once not just the k…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:31 AM
1

Infanticide law defines the offender as a woman, similar to rape laws in many places specifying that the offender is a man. Under such definitions, a male could not be tried for infanticide or a woman for rape.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:19 AM
1

Seems that way. All the women had to do to get alcohol banned was sit in front of bars or cry a lot apparently.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:21 AM
1

Whether you like it or no, T_D is highly populated and hates Feminism. I just wish it were less gynocentric broadly, but it's an improvement I guess.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:18 AM
1

Feminists have bombed domestic targets several times. You can probably find a list of terroristic acts on this sub.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:15 AM
3

No kidding. Enablers of this nonsense are just as bad. Just say No!
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:13 AM
2

Yep. Not the only example either.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:08 AM
1

Are sexual favors consensually given in exchange for career harrasment? Both benefit, but it seems only one takes the blame.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:53 PM
2

Men were too "back in the day" as is typical of historical traditional society.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:49 PM
1

Only if you towel her off when you're done. Of course not you dolt.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:47 PM
1

Yes! Uh, I mean nein!
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:44 PM
1

It's sex biased law.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:41 PM
0

Yes it is their fault and if you want to plea insanity, there are already avenues for that. You're supporting a class of crime that can only be applied to one group. There's no way of treating men leniently when your argument rests on pregnancy hormones. There's no other practical solution other than the abolition of infanticide as a distinct offense.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:34 PM
0

Testosterone doesn't work that way. In experimental conditions, the introduction of testosterone had less of an effect that the thought of being given testosterone.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:27 PM
2

Make sure your friend is in the mindset to fight back. A lot of men get demolished because they refuse to use evidence in their favor or to hold the mother accountable. Sounds like your friend let her abuses pass and gave her an easy time in court by not bringing evidence. He will get trampled if he doesn't stand up for himself.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 08:57 PM
11

Lol at your title. Honestly you mostly won't until it affects them, as with most people. That's why anti-alimony women are often second wives or anti-title ix women had sons in college. Appealing to their love for their male family members or relatives is pretty much the best way. Appealing to an idea of fairness is a much weaker approach.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:59 PM
3

I don't get why anyone thinks going after incels will have any kind of positive results. As though trying to intimidate or shame people will all of a sudden make them better at attracting a partner.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:49 PM
2

Small point, but removal of affirmative action for women is a better solution than propping up men to an inflated position.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:44 PM
6

There's a traditionalist link between Feminism and conservatives, but they don't run Feminist policies as often as left leaning groups. Don't forget that Feminism's target demo is young single women who is also the target demo of, for example, the Democratic party based on voting trends.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:40 PM
4

You listed many potentially useful groups. Why ignore any of them? Just because they don't say MRA group doesn't mean they aren't helping men.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:36 PM
9

Did you just sticky this yourself or was there a discussion before hand? This is closer to political advocacy than men's rights.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:34 PM
5

And Wheeler worked for Comcast. What about him?
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:32 PM
4

Best interest of the child is a lie. Courts have held that minor victims of sex crime are still liable for child support. It's a mess of flimsy contradictions.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 12:37 AM
3

Extortion.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 12:32 AM
2

People are against because sex education is implemented as value based, not fact based. Which is to say the instructor may assign moral values to the curriculum which is entirely outside the scope of what they should be doing. There's a difference between teaching the biological/legal realities and cheerleading for a certain sexual liberation/puritan viewpoint. I would not trust the education system to be impartial regardless of whether I agree with sex Ed.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 12:30 AM
1

Voting right isn't synonymous with voting "for hardship" (and great job with the biased emotional wording).
/r/MensRights29/11/17 12:25 AM
2

Even if he did have a father, doesn't mean it would be any better. Could be fed a steady diet of "the woman's always right" chivalry rubbish which I would say is even worse. It would be the difference between running from a lion and trying to stay one with a fork after covering yourself is zebra blood.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 12:16 AM
1

Yes, suicide rates increase at ages in which divorce is most likely (around the 30's).
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:58 PM
0

You're right, I remember there was a big anti-alimony/anti-child support women's march the other day. /s
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:56 PM
1

Sounds like bullshit, including the alleged anti-Semitism. A cartoon is not a hate crime. This seems more like govt empowering lunatics given the laundry list of "activist" groups with oh so virtuous names. Can someone tell me why the paper needed to publish the address of the new paper as well? Hmm, I wonder. That was entirely irrelevant to the story.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:44 PM
2

The fuck?
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:39 PM
1

I'm surprised it is such a recent development.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:36 PM
3

Why is this a sticky? The tie to men's issues is only tangentially suggested in the OP. This is just people arguing politics.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:34 PM
0

Creeper shot is oversensitive, dare I say feminine, terminology. Your picture can be taken in public without your consent and not liking what people say about the photo isn't a crime in and of itself. They have to point to an actual crime being committed here to take action against the site, for example using it for monetary gain.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:47 PM
2

Luckily the US doesn't have infanticide laws specifically, but as for sentencing that doesn't necessarily mean anything.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:42 PM
3

I said "trump supporter" not Trump, and you keep combining "far right" with conservative politics in general. Former Bernie voters didn't become far right by virtue of voting Republican.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:07 PM
2

Trump supporter and far right aren't the same thing. You're doing what Feminists do when they conflate MRM/MGTOW/TRP. You need to reform your question to remove your own political bias because you're not going to get the whole picture on media slander and guilt by association.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:42 PM
1

"Trapped" is too vague a term. You're better off looking at false paternity broadly speaking rather than the types of false paternity resulting from any variety unethical or criminal behavior specifically because those individual stats are hard to find if they exist at all. Even jurisdictions that have actual paternity fraud statutes won't capture the whole picture.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:18 PM
5

It's a sick way of bragging.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 05:18 AM
2

The typical lies on DV in the article, but good news nonetheless.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 05:15 AM
15

One guy posting links about Jewish MGM is the face of intactivism? Just because you're butthurt about Reddit comments doesn't mean you are now an authority on intactivism.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 05:08 AM
1

The proposed guidelines for diagnosing are incredibly vague...
/r/MensRights23/11/17 05:02 AM
0

Omg it has 7 upvotes! The traction!
/r/MensRights23/11/17 04:58 AM
2

Perhaps contact NCFM or other MRAs/MRA groups to see if they can help or provide contacts in your area. Also don't be afraid to contact "normal" civil rights groups as they'd also like to have former LEOs as advocates.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 04:51 AM
1

Supposedly it includes touching of the thighs and such things which is a bit worse..
/r/MensRights22/11/17 02:19 PM
8

On one hand, the company is completely right that it has no legal power to punish customers. That is entirely on the men to engage with law enforcement and, as usual, they don't want to report anything. So it's another example of men being their own worst enemy once again. On the other hand, the company is painting a big, expensive target on its back by not refusing service to those customers or wrongfully terminating workers. Perhaps someone can pursue a lawsuit to change things for the better …
/r/MensRights22/11/17 02:16 PM
13

Wasn't he assaulted by a woman in an elevator with footage shared to the public? Seems like he should have learned something about sexism from that incident.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 02:05 PM
3

Suffice to say that the perpetrator is now in prison, and the school has been hauled over the coals at the royal commission, which i gave evidence at. That's good, hope you're doing well personally.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:07 PM
6

I suppose. Attractive people generally do better regardless of sex, although I won't deny that there may be more advantage for women in terms of material gain.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:06 PM
10

You'd have more of a point if the child wasn't going to be raised in a two parent household. Single parent adoption/surrogacy/etc is another can of worms.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:03 PM
-2

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:02 PM
10

Why trust a government that has so hugely messed up healthcare to provide universal care? Generally speaking, one group of voters think the current admin are racist nazi Russian puppets, and the other thinks the last admin were deeply corrupt muslim brotherhood stooges. In either case, why would someone trust that government to provide universal care?
/r/MensRights18/11/17 07:57 PM
1

Is that so? I remember looking through state laws and only seeing that with GA and ID
/r/MensRights13/11/17 07:06 AM
1

I'm not aware of information that disproves the concept of hypergamy.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 06:53 AM
7

If you'd ask some of these guys, they'd say women in the workplace at all was a mistake. Like that guy who was fired because a woman eavesdropped on his conversation and heard him make a "dongle" joke to his friend at a tech conference.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 06:17 AM
2

Do you live in the real world and interact with people? Would you consider it okay for your co-workers to just proposition you with sexual acts? The workplace is a very common place for future spouses to meet, both as customers and coworkers. Not to mention the number of people who were already partners who then work together.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 06:14 AM
7

But still reports it 20 years later anonymously "to protect her family's privacy". Sounds like typical self-hating regret from a starry eyed groupie.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 06:11 AM
11

Do many women enjoy watching men jack off? ...yes? Women like penises. Is this news to you?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 06:09 AM
2

Shaking a baby isn't a minor offense though...
/r/MensRights10/11/17 06:06 AM
1

Except that knowing a baby is male changes the treatment it gets.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 06:05 AM
1

Evidence would say it's not reasonable to rule out bias. There are many studies that provide clear evidence of bias against men and toward women. For example, see A Time Trend Study of Swedish Male and Female Homicide Offenders from 1990 to 2010. (pg8) A reference study reported 63% of female filicide offenders received hospital-order or non-custodial sentences, whereas only 10% of male filicide offenders received the same sentencing. The authors reported a higher percentage of non-jail sentenci…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 06:02 AM
5

See also 6oodfella's video
/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:04 PM
10

Be always vigilant of this nonsense in US government. Even the non-PC Trump admin has hangers on pushing feminist bullshit. Ivanka is one such person who has consistently done so. Tucker: I've got three daughters so I--and a son--so I'm paying attention to the numbers on this and it seems like in this country, anyway, that the crisis is among boys, not girls. Girls graduate from college at much higher numbers, they die from drug OD's at much lower rates...same with suicide. The majority of manag…
/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:01 PM
2

I'm aware. What I'm saying is that any increases or modifications to FGM law should be expected to carry into MGM law. If you are in favor of such modifications in regard to FGM law, you can take this as a silver lining in regard to future legislation.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:00 PM
1

Very interesting.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:40 AM
4

Perhaps you should consider this good news. It's an inadvertent precedent for the inevitable MGM legislation.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:27 AM
1

That's more a "cutting off the nose to spite the face" kind of situation. Rather the goal is to defeat the "anti-MAGA" policies and pass the wanted bill than shut it down completely right away. Waiting to see the end result doesn't preclude Trump from vetoing the bill.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:18 AM
1

Men have custody ~15% of the time based on US Census data. This isn't a coincidence. OP is doing well to share their experience with other fathers. Feel free to repost in places you judge useful.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 06:53 PM
1

If you read the materials you would know convincing also includes use of force and sabotage of the condom.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 06:44 PM
2

Quite good I look forward to viewing the debate.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 06:32 PM
1

I would suggest factors of lifestyle. Suicide, homelessness, drug abuse, and hazardous work increase the rate of death for men. Lack of healthcare/healthcare funding further exacerbates the issue. Social issues stemming from these problems (crime > violence) also increase the mortality rate.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 04:53 PM
1

If you at least said "single women" then you'd have a stronger argument backed by a body of research.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 04:51 PM
1

That Uni worker was brought in for tweeting "kill all men"
/r/MensRights02/11/17 04:48 PM
2

useful work and protection of women If you look at occupational breakdowns there's really no arguing against this. Men are the vast majority of security and infrastructure employees.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 04:47 PM
2

If the title is a question, the answer is almost certainly "No." and here is no exception. The only way this could happen is if women do the approaching, which is fantastical thinking.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 04:45 PM
4

Pretty much. It's a combination of the standard SJW hysteria regarding men and the self-satisfaction "anti-SJWs" of various flavors watching the former eat their own.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 04:43 PM
1

No problem. I have a lot of information because I've been active in the forum for a couple of years and save every interesting link I come across. I've only done minor local activism and donated to organizations that are more prominent.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 04:40 PM
1

Still a paltry number, but there's one in Batesville as well. http://nofamilyviolence.webs.com/services
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:41 PM
3

Racial differences in sentencing were quite close in women according the the US Sentencing Commission pg 122 Figure 4.4 displays the results of separate analyses for males and females in each group. The white and black bars show that it is male Black and Hispanic offenders who have greater odds of imprisonment than White males. Female Black and Hispanic offenders actually have somewhat lower odds of imprisonment than their White counterparts. While the benefit of having dependents or attending c…
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:22 PM
15

If this FGM is deemed legal, then the feminists will go totally apeshit and they are a formidable force when they get angry. No they wont. They didn't when the charges were first brought. Cultural relativism and intersectionalism won't let them cause a big stink because it's related to Islam. Take for example how Linda Sarsour is lauded as a Muslim feminist while promoting Sharia, while Ayan Hirsi Ali is demonized as an anti-muslim extremist for criticizing Islam and the cutting of her own body.…
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:15 PM
2

Misdemeanor in my state.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:09 PM
2

Hermesmann v. Seyer : was a precedent-setting Kansas, United States case in which Colleen Hermesmann successfully argued that a woman is entitled to sue the father of her child for child support even if conception occurred as a result of a criminal act committed by the woman. See also S.F. v. STATE EX REL. T.M. India: Martyrs of Marriage: Brought on the statute in 1983 to protect married women from violence within marital home, section 498A of Indian Penal Code, also known as the anti dowry law …
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:07 PM
1

Taking more in taxes from men to give to women is your solution to alimony and child support? Women would not be paying into ubi funding at nearly the same rate.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 04:29 PM
1

They already did in one UK county, remember? It can be reported as a hate crime.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 03:54 PM
1

Speculation
/r/MensRights21/10/17 03:47 PM
1

...no. rape is sex. Don't be hysterical.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 03:39 PM
1

I think that was one of the best segments.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 02:09 PM
8

...no? What?
/r/MensRights21/10/17 02:03 PM
3

Probably related to deaths at Benghazi and destabilizing Libya.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 02:01 PM
1

Kipnis gets the interviews and not the original victim in her story or any of the men who went through the system. Why is that...?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:37 AM
2

What an embarrassment. He can't help himself, can he?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:35 AM
1

He's a salty bastard and knows what he did. I laughed, but not everyone appreciates black humor. I don't have any reason to think he actually hates gays or something having seen tons of his videos.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:31 AM
6

So what?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:25 AM
1

Narrow your focus. Domestic violence is well researched for example. Look into Dr Donald Dutton, Dr Strauss, and Erin Pizzey.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:23 PM
2

Sure won't harm it.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:21 PM
1

It's always amusing how unaware people are when prison is discussed in terms of race when it's not black women who are being incarcerated at such high rates
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:19 PM
1

I would like to know what caused the CPS to become involved in the first place...
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:17 PM
1

HIV technically
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:04 PM
1

Shouldn't have picked a barrister for an unlawful arrest.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:02 PM
1

Thanks for the info
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:00 PM
1

Slightly. Depends on where the cut is. If it's on the center line where the scrotum is divided it would be more noticeable. I'm not sure a person could spot it unless they know what to look for.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 05:47 AM
3

Boo hoo goodness gracious. Vince Foster would like a word.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 05:44 AM
2

How do you prove it was deliberately removed? There's only two people there.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 04:15 AM
18

Have fun when you're old and no one pays attention.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 03:55 AM
3

So inconsistent. Jade Hatt didn't get a day after appeal for leniency
/r/MensRights07/10/17 03:54 AM
1

GA Code 16-6-1 specifically defines rape as be perpetrated by a male with his penis against a female, and has mandatory rape charges if the victim is a female below a certain age.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 04:29 PM
1

It's also right wing in that it's undemocratic That doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 04:27 PM
1

Also circumvented Congress with DACA, repeatedly allowed previously deported aliens to return with lax border enforcement, and allowed "sanctuary" jurisdictions without push-back.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 04:26 PM
5

Jordan "Porn is evil and MGTOW are weasels" Peterson
/r/MensRights02/10/17 07:58 PM
1

Open borders is right wing? I think you'd be more accurate in stating there isn't a conservative party as the rino types are running the show atm. This is to say both parties are left leaning globalists, but one is more left and openly racist and sexist.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 08:02 PM
1

If men are treated more harshly in "progressive" society dating back hundreds of years, why would it be different elsewhere? Which society is immune to the concept of disposable males?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:49 PM
1

Honor violence is of any form as long as it fulfills the punishment. Vitriol throwing is only one method. There's also stoning, caning, whipping, beating, flame, etc
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:47 PM
1

The Lighthouse Project may be interested.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:40 PM
1

Why a stadium? Aren't there more cost effective options?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:38 PM
1

No, Turner did not rape, the victim said he should not be jailed, both were extremely drunk with the victim taking part in drinking before even attending the party. It was mutually consensual drunken behavior. The female probation officer recommended the sentence as well.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:31 PM
2

She's full of shit obviously. I'm only aware of one shelter for trafficked boys being created by Florida Dream Center. Haven't gotten an update on it in a while.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:24 PM
3

And she's appealing to protect her parental rights. What a fuck.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:20 PM
1

Many times more women were given non-prison custodial sentencing than men for child murder in...Sweden I believe with the numbers at 60% vs 10% over multiple years examined.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:15 PM
2

I know right. Just paid their way into a useless degree while pretending it increases their value to actual professionals.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:12 PM
1

Both would be factually true.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:08 PM
2

Any footage of their meetings?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:05 PM
6

I'm confused. Do you suggest having one's penis cut doesn't cause horrendous pain?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:03 PM
3

If they are in the US they are likely cut or cut their kids.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:01 PM
1

No idea, I would recommend patience as the new rules are under consideration.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 06:52 PM
3

American Circumcision the documentary was completed this year.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:47 PM
4

Kind of. Despite every effort by feminism at large, people like Sommers, Paglia, Jaye, etc still pop up now and again.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:31 PM
0

I can't believe he stopped her after getting stabbed. Seems this wouldn't have been the first time she's gone off.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:28 PM
2

Like that one guy who almost lost his eye when a broad hit him with a high heel shoe and bloodied him.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:26 PM
1

Phillip Davies MP pointed out that if men were treated similarly to women in the UK justice system, something like 5 out of 6 men wouldn't be in jail.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:24 PM
3

Yes, yes, yes/no. US gov just pledged $200 million to for more women/diversity in STEM bs.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:20 PM
2

Similar sentences is a bit of fishy wording. Women can't be charged with rape in GA, so I'm curious was offense a woman was charged with in order to get that sentence or if they are even referring to charges against a women in the first place.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:16 PM
14

Mark Pearson's Crowdfunder for legal action against the prosecution
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:14 PM
11

Mark Pearson's Crowdfunder for legal action against the prosecution
/r/MensRights26/09/17 03:13 PM
1

Yes, but I'd rather they do both. Repealing suffrage isn't possible due to women having a majority of votes anyway, even if all men voted in favor.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:10 PM
1

Lol not that I'm aware
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:05 PM
2

Perhaps "school choice" and a competitive, rather than collectivist, approach to education would attract men who can earn on merit.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:59 PM
1

Ayyy lmao
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:46 PM
2

That would suck for any actual wra. The distinction is useful to separate the crazy from the good.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:42 PM
1

Why accept the premise at face value that the population must continue to grow, and further that immigration must be used to cover any shortfall?
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:39 PM
1

Good that they included other cases in the article to illustrate the trend.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:34 PM
1

Archive cnn
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:30 PM
12

Ah Cathy that explains it.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:27 PM
4

You are deranged if you think pr would change the minds of those lunatics. Also, you sure as hell post a lot in a sub to be saying "you guys". If you don't like it get bent and go somewhere else instead of concern trolling about pr and how we're perceived by political ideologues.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:23 PM
5

Which system oppresses women?
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:16 PM
2

Wrong. Brock Turner wasn't even charged with rape, let alone convicted. You bought the lies wholesale.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:15 PM
1

It won't be taken over unless you're spineless, in which case you're the wrong person to start the group. Stop worrying about name calling and bullshit smears. Run the group and keep it on track or don't bother.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 02:12 PM
2

Good for them! Seems CAFE is really growing.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 06:54 PM
2

Likely her own fault for lack of communication or inability to turn off the voice in her head as Bettina Arndt would say.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 06:51 PM
1

Rip disability payments
/r/MensRights11/09/17 06:45 PM
1

Yeah sure tax-paid tampons while everyone sits around waiting for male dv shelters. Let's green light every petty request to grow the size of government because it's just oh so reasonable. It's not like grown ass women can plan for their periods. They're so dumb, poor, and irresponsible the government should mandate sanitation products under threat of law and therefore state violence.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 06:41 PM
2

I would look into legal cases by the national coalition for men and the activities of CAFE. Check out the speakers at every ICMI as well as they are often involved in various events, lobbying efforts, etc Further, note that not everyone who advocates for men's rights is an MRA so there are positive development that aren't under the umbrella so to speak.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 06:26 PM
1

In California, yes.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 06:13 PM
5

Spam post about someone literally called "pettythrowaway"
/r/MensRights11/09/17 06:11 PM
1

Written by Emily Yoffe
/r/MensRights10/09/17 02:37 PM
1

Not sure if that one incident is the cause. I can say in the US that 911 has created an entire industry of crappy security guards who have you take off your shoes to check them for bombs.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 02:27 PM
1

I would assume it depends on the state, but I think there's only restrictions on government property like courthouses or schools in a lot of cases. In my state you can carry on college campuses if you have all your paperwork sorted.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 02:22 PM
1

It's happened before. Rasmea Odeh did it as a member of a Palestinian military group. Two people died.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 02:20 PM
128

It doesn't even make sense. Having compassion for someone is different than wanting to have sex with them. If anything, it would make a guy more apprehensive to make any kind of intimate advances.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 02:14 PM
5

That's an odd thing to sue for. However, I don't begrudge them for deciding on home schooling if they consider the education department to be promoting values other than those related to academics.
/r/MensRights10/09/17 02:11 PM
1

There's no we in this case. If MGTOW is for you, that's your choice. But be honest with the reason why you may stop and don't just blame external factors.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:55 PM
1

Condom or vasectomy/store sperm are your only options. Also be aware of cohabitation laws that will marry you by default.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:53 PM
2

Woman not girl. One is a responsible adult.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:51 PM
1

Where's the father? Who's in charge of the child now?
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:48 PM
2

I wouldn't be sure there's a difference other than how long it takes to kill oneself via substance abuse. Self medication and suicide have similar root causes and are often co-morbid.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:33 PM
1

Not likely, but the sex ratio in suicides is similar in all but a few countries in which women suicide more.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:29 PM
1

You say people, but men are 3/4 of suicides. Why aren't women killing themselves as much if it's only a reflection of safety? Further consider that men are less safe than women in terms of crime victimization.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:27 PM
1

Just like original sin--- I mean toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:25 PM
1

Also suicide is top 3 starting at the ripe old age of 10-14, so in aggregate it may be greater.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:18 PM
1

Under 50. The list is all males including things like Alzheimer's.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:16 PM
1

Considering 70% of suicides are male I wouldn't be surprised, particularly in safe developed countries.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:15 PM
1

Red = truth about men's current lot in life, gender politics in general, blue = living in gynocentric society none the wiser
/r/MensRights09/09/17 01:07 PM
2

I would expect a greater backlash from average people who cut their child or grown men who are cut. Religious Jews and Muslims would also not receive it well in many cases.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:11 PM
1

Ncfm, save services, and I think FIRE (who are not an MRA group)
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:09 PM
3

Contact the foundation for Individual Rights in Education. They may have input and seem to be interested in campus outreach. thefire.org
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:07 PM
2

Four men out of 103 indicates increased demand?
/r/MensRights08/09/17 11:05 PM
37

He is at least aware of false accusations.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 10:59 PM
1

I think there are testing exceptions for things like rare diseases where the person can only access experimental treatment. I would think parents who want to give their baby a chance at life would be just as compelling an argument.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 07:40 AM
1

It's related in the sense that it's typical to think of a mass shooter as male and highly publicized when it occurs, often with the same toxic masculinity talking points.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 07:20 AM
2

Look up "saying goodbye to crazy" on YouTube. Also, having the will to fight and not be a doormat is a huge part of getting through this situation.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 07:12 AM
1

This whole mess is the tolerable solution for Dems. Just announcing the intention to change it is intolerable for them, so I don't know what kind of compromise you're expecting.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 07:10 AM
1

Because progress is being made. The powers that be have lost the stranglehold on information. What rights we have left in the US are still sufficient to push back.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 07:01 AM
1

Try the database of lawsuits at titleixforall.com (aka boys and men in Education)
/r/MensRights08/09/17 06:52 AM
7

It's a joke.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 06:37 AM
6

If you haven't already, Earnest Belfort Bax published writings on this topic in the early 1900s.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 06:34 AM
8

People were doubtful of The Red Pill as well. If anything, I would expect a very negative response that would further publicize the movie.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:47 AM
1

In that case I'm genuinely curious on why you think men and not women are drafted. Simply put, because women don't want to be drafted. Hundreds of thousands of women marched in DC at the beginning of the year for any variety of causes. Excluding de-segregating the draft. Feminist orgs don't sue to integrate. Politicians don't want to upset female voters. Women got theirs for free and they don't want to give it up or don't care enough to change it. Gynocentric men don't want to hurt the poor wimm…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 06:15 PM
2

It's an issue of biology in a significant way, or the concept of masculinity as a "performance" in that the status of a man is linked to his ability to get resources in one way or another. In the case of women, there is a distinct time in which she has her first period and is officially a woman. The only thing that compares in men is loss of virginity, but even that doesn't solidify a status as a man.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 06:05 PM
1

and will have a black mark on their careers for years. Is there some kind of "permanent record" or is that just BS like in grade school?
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:59 PM
3

lol first time I've heard that one.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:56 PM
1

Focusing on crying doesn't address the issues regarding the imposition of stoicism on men nor the double standard of calling for, then denigrating, "sensitive" men.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:54 PM
1

Unfortunately has an audio delay, but otherwise fine.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:50 PM
3

Good. The lack of comments and notice combined with unlawful enforcement made this whole thing a massive power grab by the feds.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:25 PM
3

She already has spoken with mra groups and more or less suspended a large number of title ix enforcement proceedings.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:23 PM
1

Why? Are they segregated or are you making assumptions?
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:20 PM
2

Lel
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:15 PM
1

Society already treats Women like that...
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:14 PM
1

I believe the department of Justice Statistics keeps a record of such cases in annual reports. In those records, female staff were 90% of alleged staff sexual misconduct offenders while being 40% of total staff.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:10 PM
1

Any place that is highly undeveloped is generally more equal overall aka shitty for everyone.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 06:53 PM
1

It's nice when the public good intersects with making a profit. Hopefully they won't need to promote their services for too long and can move on after making a tidy sum. After all, the taxpayers are often footing the bill for these lawsuits.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 06:22 PM
1

It's illegal to discriminate based on sex, just as it's illegal to steal my car. Whether the thief is prosecuted or not doesn't have any bearing on whether it was an illegal act. The difference here is that it takes mountains of money to bring a case against the government vs a car thief. And funding is lacking just as much as the public will to see the law changed.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 06:18 PM
1

Your point was that white men are almost exclusively depicted as heroes. Now you are arguing that they aren't, but it's okay because it fits reality. Why is it that "reality" includes movies like Atomic Blonde and Charlie's Angels but not an Arnold/Bond/Gerard Butler/Jason Statham/Wesley Snipes/Liam Neeson/etc/etc movie where the male protagonist guns down, knifes to death, explodes, or otherwise maims innumerable women? And Wonder Woman did not do that. All the amazons were heroic figures who l…
/r/MensRights30/08/17 06:11 PM
2

What... What kind of films and TV shows are you watching?? White men are almost exclusively protrayed as heroes... Have you forgotten the innumerable goons who serve no other purpose but to be shot to death within seconds on appearing on screen? I struggle to think of a movie in which the opposing force is made up of nothing but expendable female goons who die in ever more violent and elaborate scenarios.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:24 AM
1

I'm not aware of information specifically regarding molestors, only murder of children and crime sentencing in general. What I would be wary of are the definitions used in any sources you reference. Many areas do not charge women with the same sex crimes as they do men. And not just in the sense they are given an easier time in court, but also they literally cannot be charged with the same crimes due to the definitions used in the laws.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:13 AM
1

Well that's a positive development, thank you for sharing. For those who aren't aware, KC Johnson also coauthored "Rape Frenzy on Campus" and other works detailing the injustices regarding campus "courts" and due process violations.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:04 AM
1

Not as expensive as you think considering you can just convert all the men's rooms to unisex first.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 03:58 AM
1

Yes, I've already parked my preferred usernames on those sites. I'll have to look into bitchute again as I wasn't sure if it was functional for all users yet. Using alternative search engines or switching from google mail/products may also be a good idea.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 03:55 AM
2

You could I suppose. It matters more what "feminist" actually entails in terms of belief system rather than adopting the label. If you agreed with the positions of the men's rights advocates, then that would put you at odds with what "establishment feminism" in academia, politics, and media believe and advocate. I think the majority of the loudest and most influential feminists, and their supporters, would have a bigger problem with you calling yourself a feminist that many MRAs would. Cassie Ja…
/r/MensRights30/08/17 03:51 AM
1

The government sends mail to remind people and it's part of accessing many government services (ID, drivers license, financial aid applications, etc). The mailing part is extraordinarily ineffective though as people often don't update their address.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 03:44 AM
7

Legal action and legislation officially, social awareness unofficially. As another commenter stated, the FGM case being brought in the midwest will do much to inform the future of the legality of nonconsenual genital cutting. In addition, expect any case relating to this issue to be taken to the supreme court as religion is involved and both muslims and jews will fight very hard to preserve the practice.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 03:41 AM
31

Circumcision related deaths are undercounted due to issues with death reporting. Deaths caused by genital cutting are often attributed to the direct cause of death, such as blood loss or infection, rather than the cutting of the genitals.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 03:35 AM
2

Likely yes due to the violation of the right to equal protection under the law as FGM is illegal federally. The case hasn't been brought yet.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 03:34 AM
2

One of the most simple and narrow arguments is that a man raped by a woman should be able to abdicate responsibility if they choose. As it stands they are legally liable and courts have ruled the state has a greater interest in securing payment than protecting minors from sex abuse.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 02:42 PM
5

Reminds me of the guy who was falsely convicted of rape after being seen in a dream.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 11:35 PM
8

Diffrerence is people like Brownmiller and Dworkin are lauded feminist icons. This guys isn't the equivalent.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 11:29 PM
6

I thought it would be of interest to compare/contrast an article promoting female genital cutting to those that promote male genital cutting.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 12:56 AM
1

Also of interest from the article. Hollis Public Schools settled a separate lawsuit with the victim and his family in July that accused the school district of covering up the crime. The district agreed to pay $125,000 to the family.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 01:26 PM
6

That's what I was thinking. Depressing.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 01:17 PM
1

It in the form of a speech rather than a round table/AA type deal, so perhaps that's easier?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 01:13 PM
1

A few things to note: This happened in Thailand, not the US (although I'm not sure it would have made a difference). There were points of success and points of (massive) failure. The family alerted authorities and the CPS "wanted to seize the child". The police and the father did not press the issue. CPS are going to "speak with the family to ensure it was safe for the baby to return home."
/r/MensRights15/08/17 01:11 PM
1

Statistically speaking, infant males have the highest abuse and mortality rates. It's only until late adolescence that the abuse stats flip. Link
/r/MensRights15/08/17 01:05 PM
20

What the fuck...
/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:24 PM
1

I was making a dig at the complete lack of awareness from Vice in writing a slander article targeting mostly black men while also being an outfit promoting the typical privileged identity politics rubbish. They did something that would be excoriated as racist if someone else had done it.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:20 PM
1

I'm not well informed enough on the passage of Title IX to comment on whether it was actually designed to do so. However, in the case of the current violations, I think it's a twisted path to establish the kangaroo courts rather than a direct reading of Title IX.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:15 PM
1

They probably could, but it's not going to happen at this point given that article is over a year old.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:14 PM
3

Word's like woke are linked to the KKK. "Woke" started with black activists. It was used facetiously by opponents, not just KKK types, and is now used ubiquitously and still often sarcastically.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 03:12 PM
2

I agree that MRAs should be more visible, but I also think you're being naive in thinking that exposure alone would improve the image of the MRM given that most exposure takes the form of gotcha interviews by strongly opposed pundits, misquotes/lies/slander from hostile press, or dishonest grandstanding from political figures. Such opposition is largely why the MRM has a bad reputation rather than due to the advocacy of the MRM. The movement is still in the grass roots stage rather than the mass…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 06:29 AM
2

They picked a comment in a thread to typify a sub with 150k readers. The horror. Why didn't they pick the thread with 401 upvotes that link to an Indian domestic violence hotline? Or the sticky asking women what they think of the female victimhood narrative? Or any of the many female MRAs who are lauded in the movment?
/r/MensRights14/08/17 06:19 AM
2

I would like you to tell me what right wing extremism is and what about MGTOW is right wing extremism.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 06:14 AM
1

However, some of your rhetoric can seem quite a bit close to their's at times. Such as?
/r/MensRights14/08/17 06:12 AM
1

Well, one sticky ATM is about the Google Memo which, in part, addresses workplace discrimination against men. There's another post about false accusations, one help thread regarding divorce, one help thread about paternity rights, two social posts on MGM, and one other with information about a DV help line for Indian men. If you're new, you can post a thread asking for more information or search topics in the search bar. There are many years of posts to reference. You can also filter posts by fl…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 06:10 AM
2

It's interesting to see leftist identity politics groups clash with rightist identity politics groups. I can't believe they didn't see this coming.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 06:03 AM
1

Equating men's rights with white supremacy is the same as equating women's rights with white supremacy. Funnily enough this has probably already happened due to internationalist and the push against "white feminism."
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:41 AM
1

Is there much to talk about in games anymore? There's the CoD black female soldiers thing and The Last Night twitter deal but that's pretty small potatoes.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:39 AM
1

I'm not sure honestly. It seems that at this point it's the Republicans that are the issue. While the Democrats are running an ideological inquisition the Rep Uniparty is propping up them up. There really isn't an actual conservative party in government. Ideally the Dems will collapse (from eating themselves most likely) and the Reps will split into center left and conservatives. But that's probably asking for a miracle.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:35 AM
1

And you also have prominent liberal legal scholars like Alan Dershowitz being called a bigot for being opposed to the Mueller special counsel as though it addresses the legal arguments being made.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:26 AM
4

Not the only one. Many of the most popular MRAs are women (Karen Straughan, Allison Tieman, Hannah Wallen, Janice Fiamengo, Diana Davidson, Erin Pizzey). Then you also have women who are supportive but don't use the label (Christina Hoff Sommers, Camile Paglia, Anne Cools, Cassy Jaye)
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:21 AM
1

It's part truth, part conspiracy. For example, there is evidence that people like Bob Creamer paid agitators to start fights at Trump rallies during the election. I'm not sure that there's a NEW WORLD ORDER, but there are enough individual acts of politically-motivated malfeasance that it gives the appearance of a coordinated whole.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:16 AM
1

They would reference mass shooters instead like the guy from...Sweden I think?
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:12 AM
1

Feminists could have been your natural allies, instead you've turned them into enemies. I'd like to get into a bit of history here. Elizabeth Candy Stanton was one of the most prominent "women's rights activists" during the 1800s. She is quoted in an 1868 speech as follows: "I urge a sixteenth amendment, because 'manhood suffrage,' or a man's government, is civil, religious, and social disorganization. The male element is a destructive force, stern, selfish, aggrandizing, loving war, violence, c…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:10 AM
2

That won't work. They know the stats on custody and incarceration rates. No way they'll give up their child supoort/alimony and court privilege (think of the children and poor women!). There are people who don't even think women jails should exist because women "aren't suited for jail." You might have a propaganda victory with "normies" though.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:02 AM
1

I'll agree with you that this sub can feel more like an antifeminism sub than a mensrights sub at times. Those things are very different (whilst members are likely to crossover a lot!). I'm curious to know how those are different given feminists are roadblocks to legal change or directly responsible for anti-male laws. One cannot ignore feminism and still make headway in advocating for men at the legal level.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 04:55 AM
1

That's not true at all. Warren Farrell is one of the most soft spoken people you'll ever see and his activism has been swept under the rug for decades, even with his credentials as a NOW board member. In contrast, Paul Elam has been stirring shit for years and it resulted in an award winning documentary being made about the MRM. Dropping belligerence is no more useful than dropping soft speaking. Frankly, some people need to be spoken to belligerently because they're assholes who need to be stoo…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 04:53 AM
2

Reading the anger and use of words like "SJW" "Woke" while moaning about feminism or "the left" gives off that vibe. The only way to change this is if The Left were to actually cooperate with men's issues topics. For example, a bill was proposed in GA to improve (restore) due process rights for men on college campuses in response to gross violations by the last Department of Education Office for Civil Rights. Every single no vote was Democrat.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 04:47 AM
1

It would help this sub and that MRA's in general to fight against such ideology popping up in the group. The pursuit of ideological purity is a self-defeating, bottomless pit of persecution that latches onto every more minor disagreements as grounds for ostracism. Whether you like them or not, "red pillers" and "alt right" (both vague and pejorative terms) do have valid points and at the very least are worth interacting with in order to understand what they actually think and perhaps more import…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 04:41 AM
6

Have you ever wondered why it's okay for women to use all sorts of sex toys, robots, attachments, and thingamajigs but if men buy a fleshlight or something their shamed? Why is it that sex dolls for men need legislation but women are free to do as they please? What is to be gained by making sure men can only (legally) have sex with another human (woman) rather than being able to take care of it themselves in whatever manner they choose?
/r/MensRights14/08/17 04:31 AM
4

a man can choose not to be with a woman who does not bring anything to the table. If only they availed themselves of that choice more often...
/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:07 AM
2

They should have said "other people's money" to be more accurate in this context.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:06 AM
3

You're oversimplifying. I would point to the incentive of the State to force men to repay welfare costs and generally keep women off the dole under threat of incarceration. Why would a woman need to be married or otherwise faithful to a man if the state will step in to make him give her money?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:05 AM
8

You joke, but the NFL "rapey report" compiled by Vice was mostly black men, and most were never even accused of a rape let alone convicted of such a crime. And no one batted an eye.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 01:59 AM
6

lol that's my thought as well. Who was under the impression it was meant to help men in any way?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 01:57 AM
1

I wouldn't be surprised. The govt has been promoting female quotas since 2012.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 01:54 AM
1

What, off the top of my head?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 12:38 AM
3

You're kidding yourself if you think feminists will go nuts over legal FGM. In fact, a lot of states don't have anti-FGM legislation and I'm not aware of feminist campaigns to enact them. They've barely made a fuss as it is in part due to intersectional pecking orders. I've read more on this case from niche places like jihadwatch than secondhand Huffpost/Salon/Jezebel/etc. To be sure, there will be some media attention (especially if it can be pinned on the Trump admin), but it will die down rat…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:40 AM
1

Not everyone agrees access to a medical professional's labor is a right.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:30 AM
1

You're making stuff up. The actual quote is from the defense attorney in general terms: "Legislators have taken the teacher portion out of the equation," Stephen R. Allred, Defense Attorney with Zabriskie Law Firm told 2News. "I don't consider this a loophole. These 16 and 17 year olds do have a choice, and they have chosen to engage in this." You say: The fact that they claimed that "16 and 17 year olds can choose this" means that the supposed victim CHOSE to have sex, ergo it wasn't actually r…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:24 AM
1

I'm quite pleased for such a well written and reasonable memo is associated with the MRM, even if it really only has a secondary association by citing...facts.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:11 PM
1

For a primary source dating to 1908 see The Legal Subjection of Men or The Fraud of Feminism dating to 1913. There is much information on family law, property law, and marital liability.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 06:57 PM
1

(I heard the real life Rosie quit her job after a very short time as a factory worker...)
/r/MensRights08/08/17 06:48 PM
3

TLDW: The Alberta PD is not taking seriously alleged sexual abuse, false accusations, and stalking. They refuse to create documentation of such complaints or investigate the matter. The complainant, with help from an officer in another jurisdiction, compiled a case file that is still not being taken seriously by Alberta PD. In the interim, another false complaint has been filed against the complainant. The complainant, in concert with The Lighthouse Project, is seeking help to fund legal action …
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:54 PM
1

If the claims of police misconduct are true, this seems like another hysteria grown from a valid complaint unfortunately.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:49 PM
3

Perhaps she'll receive a Woman Of Courage Award for "enduring harassment" after her trial and join the honored company of Mattress Girl.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:45 PM
1

Develop better skills, personality, or very simply lower one's standards.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:41 PM
1

As I understand, this is only for federal student aid. Have they sought other methods of financial aid at the moment?
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:40 PM
2

Fuck if I know, she's in a facility for "troubled youth." She might be pretty messed up to begin with. That's the whole point here why it was a bad thing for Scott to do.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 01:31 AM
1

The most obvious way of asserting such things is a practice called "conspicuous consumption," or spending money in ways in which people will notice your spending of money. Manner of dress and location/price of the bar are such kinds of things, as are expensive cars, clothes, etc. Downside is that it's a costly way of working on the "front end" of attraction rather than the intimacy part. As far as plastic surgery, it's up to you whether it's worth it of course. I would suggest, however, that unl…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 01:29 AM
13

Uh oh we've got a wrong-thinker. Good luck to whoever wrote that. If his bosses have their head on straight they'd give them a promotion.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 01:09 AM
1

An investigation began after what police described as “love letters” were found in the juvenile’s room at the facility, where Scott had been a teacher since October of 2015. Scott referred to the victim as “her girlfriend” in the letters and detailed some areas of their relationship.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 02:21 PM
3

Men's attractiveness is based in part on how successful they are in whatever endeavors they undertake. In general terms, this is measured in wealth, independence, and social influence rather than age and beauty.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 02:20 PM
10

What a flippin' lunatic she is...
/r/MensRights05/08/17 04:12 AM
2

The proposed rule document states a deadline of August 21.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 04:10 AM
4

Eh, you play the hand you're dealt. Lucky for men, you can achieve your way out of a bad hand.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 04:07 AM
3

Good luck, man. Let us know how things go.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 04:05 AM
2

Is that so? Could you refer to a source?
/r/MensRights04/08/17 05:25 PM
0

I don't think the way to deal with the unequal results in cases involving female vs. male teachers is to start hammering females with tough sentences. At present, very little, if anything at all, will change until women feel the effects. That's why you see articles lamenting the rising female prison population despite 90%+ male inmates. That's why you see articles lamenting increasing female suicide rates despite 70%+ male victims. It's a cynical approach, but there's no denying the effectivenes…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 05:23 PM
4

You are confused. The letters were written by the teacher calling the student her "girlfriend", not the student, who, by the way, was attending a "a school for traumatized youth", which is to say a particularly vulnerable population.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 05:00 PM
1

This also happened some time ago with a female gym teacher/female student reported as a "sex romp"
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:09 PM
3

A bit more than that, actually: In addition to the electronic home monitoring, Scott was given five years of consecutive sex offender probation and ordered not to have any contact with the student. She will also undergo an evaluation by the state Sexual Offenders Assessment Board to determine whether she meets the criteria for a sexually violent predator, which may trigger another hearing. What really surprises me is that she got 3 months with a female victim.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:06 PM
2

Great talk. If anyone is new here, he ran into issues a year or two ago with Australia's premier domestic violence racketeers, White Ribbon Australia, for making comments counter to their narrative. I would suggest sending Dr. Ahmed a supportive email as he definitely reads his emails and replied to my message back when things were still heated.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:03 PM
1

To think that she could have been arrested and convicted under Florida law for statutory rape is astounding and really defeats the purpose of statutory rape laws. Honestly, you'd be in more danger of being charged with rape than she would. That's part of the larger problem here: a lack of accountability for females and the double standards when a young male vs a young female engages in sexual contact with a legal adult.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:00 PM
3

Why do they need this and will it solve the problem as described? Such female STEM initiatives have largely been a failure.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:56 PM
4

The Green Corn Rebellion is one I thought of, but I don't know how it really compares to MLK riots and such.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:52 PM
2

I don't mean to suggest you shouldn't like being a man or be comfortable in your own skin. My point is ff you were better informed on the issues men face you wouldn't list "lazy clothes day" as a valid struggle for comparison. I would ask you: what rights do men have that women do not? In the mean time, I'll list some of the issues men face and avoid the more fuzzy social issues, although I find them just as important: There is no sanction for male infant genital cutting, which is a violation of…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:50 PM
21

This is whitewashing a lot of what these "waves" actually did, or sometimes more importantly, didn't do. The first wave included literal terrorists, were counter productive in securing female suffrage, and either pushed or condoned seriously lopsided laws. Some of the most anti-male rape hysteria feminists are in the second wave and solidified so many ant-male domestic violence and rape myths. And the third is just the icing on the cake combining them all. If it weren't for critical statements o…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:16 PM
12

I'm not sure that you're fully aware of the issues at hand...
/r/MensRights04/08/17 12:19 AM
3

Are you telling me men weren't interested in classic films like Vin Diesel's "The Pacifier"?
/r/MensRights04/08/17 12:07 AM
2

Extremely poor judgement and deeply selfish, but I'm not sure that rapist is the proper term unless the special ed students in question were genuinely of limited capacity. Special ed can refer to many types of students, not all of which need a great deal of assistance.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 12:03 AM
2

I'm not sure her relationship skills has much to do with her legal skills. And the only way to find out if they're worth listening to is to listen and decide for yourself.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 11:57 PM
1

Not solely responsible if that's what you mean. Partially, yes, alongside women. Looking throughout history, you'll see that in many cases if women ask, they shall receive. That's part of why we have so many lopsided laws. Men are content to give at their, or other men's, expense. If anything, men should be less accommodating so as to bring things into a state of legal equality rather than roll over and say "yes, dear" to every demand.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 02:52 PM
3

I don't disagree entirely, but do think the fact that pregnancy can occur really twists things up. What kind of life is it to be a father to a 28 year old's child at 16?
/r/MensRights03/08/17 02:49 PM
2

Good I think, but seems a bit new to the area of men's issues.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 02:41 PM
2

I haven't heard of that. Doesn't make much sense.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 03:34 AM
1

Men and women within the constraints of biological necessity. I find the idea quite odd to think that men only evolved some sort of love or kindness for women and children within the past few decades or that women weren't able to exert influence on men to change/implement policy.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 03:33 AM
1

I think you're falling into the same trap though to think men established the society and put themselves in seats of power without women's consent. But for sure men are also too often their own enemies in regard to solving these kinds of issues.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 12:47 AM
1

My guess is that you'd have a better chance looking up the rates of conviction for perjury/public mischief/misuse of police resources/etc, but even then you'd have to limit your scope to cases pertaining to rape/sexual battery to have even a semi-accurate count.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 12:46 AM
1

Think she'll try the Jade Hatt defense? "Your honor, she is just immature for her age."
/r/MensRights03/08/17 12:39 AM
3

Why would they need an excuse?
/r/MensRights03/08/17 12:37 AM
11

Perhaps you should focus on getting mental healthcare rather than pursuing legal remedy at this moment as the claims are from quite some time ago. If you have health insurance that covers counseling, find a provider in your area/network that specializes in sexual victimization trauma. And do not be afraid to switch providers if you are not being helped adequately or taken seriously. Another option is to seek aid from services dedicated to sexual abuse victims, although the effectiveness may depe…
/r/MensRights01/08/17 01:22 PM
2

Unlike those first wave feminists who after getting the right to vote demanded the right to defend it. What do you mean by this? If you mean opening combat roles, then yes, even if that decision is controversial. If you mean working against the Selective Service, then I'd say they only put up token resistance or protected it. "Labor feminists" lobbied against the ERA for example. And with shared parenting, groups like NOW have consistently, and for many decades, lobbied against shared parenting.…
/r/MensRights01/08/17 01:13 PM
1

Source? The most prominent serial rapist theory used on campuses was disproven due to sample bias and misuse of unrelated data.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 01:51 PM
2

I know right? It's like replacing characters in 50 Shades of Grey. Just make your own thing ffs
/r/MensRights31/07/17 01:44 PM
52

Women shouldn't be able to hold any job they "want," they should be able to hold any job they are qualified for.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 01:32 PM
1

He's much less orange now actually.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 01:01 PM
3

Traditionalist and Feminist views are more alike than different. Women good, men bad.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 12:56 PM
1

I would ask via the sidebar link
/r/MensRights30/07/17 12:54 PM
1

Thanks for the book reference.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 03:39 AM
1

I was going to say the same thing. So often "girl" is used when "woman" is appropriate. Somehow calling someone a woman has become a pejorative.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 03:37 AM
2

There are currently two cases in progress, one of which is being pursued by the National Coalition for Men. Marc Angelucci, a lawyer at NCFM gave a talk at ICMI'17 regarding the group's activism and touched on the lawsuit. You can view the appeals court hearing from 2015 on the Ninth Circuit YouTube channel. The case is still in litigation. Alternatively, the US govt is set to establish a commission to review sex segregation of the selective service (among other aspects of the SSS), but they are…
/r/MensRights28/07/17 03:34 AM
1

You've attributed an argument to me that I haven't made by turning a question into a statement that assumes my position. ("So you think X?" Rather than "Do you think X?") My point is that enough women do not care to abolish infanticide laws to create a movement to do so. Just as not enough women care to abolish permanent alimony or reform the child support system. Same as with most men who are not educated on the topics, but they do not have an incentive to keep the status quo as do so many wome…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:14 PM
2

I would say they are either in progress or out of his hands for the most part. A lot of this has to go through the dysfunctional House and Senate which have taken months to argue about what they postured to do for years.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:05 PM
1

It's a basic part of human attraction. It's no different than height preference. The vast majority of women date men taller than them (not necessarily tall) just as the vast majority prefer a man who is more successful (not necessarily the most successful). Equal or better educational level is also of importance. With men, the vast majority look for women with a hip-waist ratio around 0.7 and neotenous features, which carry between cultures and races. As I said, generally speaking. And in regard…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 04:02 PM
1

I think that info is anonymous in proceedings for the most part. Maybe titleixforall.com has info
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:33 PM
2

Indeed. It has happened in the west and progressing further and further in places like India.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:31 PM
1

Headline space is a factor. Have you read "Effacing the Male"? It's an article on coverage of the Kosovo war that very well illustrates the point being made by the poster.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:28 PM
1

Good to see information from other countries.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:22 PM
2

It's likely based partially on the recorded evidence that cutting puts the child in extreme distress that alters brain chemistry for a prolonged period.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:17 PM
51

It's tough being the only person out there good on her.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:05 PM
1

You are right that the tables do not state what is claimed. They are only rates of death and do not address perpetrator or circumstance. However, the latest report on Child Maltreatment from the Department of Health and Human Services states that 31.4% of all child fatalities were attributed to a woman compared to 20.7% of those attributed to males. (pg 61 using single perps with stated sex) Mother alone (26.7%) account for more perps than the combined single actor males. The total ratio is stat…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 02:20 PM
1

If you're going to be pedantic, then half way to being dead. How's that? Not young, that's for sure.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:10 PM
0

I know this is a little unfair, but I have to ask where are the women's march to end infanticide laws?
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:08 PM
2

Noticing that the justice system is biased doesn't make someone sexist.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:00 PM
2

Look up interviews on Paul Elam YouTube like Zander Keig
/r/MensRights24/07/17 12:39 PM
6

Hard to protest every hospital in the US. Bloodstained Men do protest pediatric conventions though.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 12:36 PM
1

Even if it were a real sub, the idea that women would need a safe space to trash men is laughable. They can do so with impunity.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 12:34 PM
2

Could be. Perhaps the author and subject wanted to commiserate as well.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 05:08 PM
6

Depends on what you mean when you say "woman with a good job." Generally speaking, women are not career focused and those that art will almost certainly be looking to partner with a career focused man who also makes more than her. A poor woman wants a man with a job, a well-off woman wants a man with a high paying job, and a rich woman wants a CEO. At each step, the pool of "acceptable" men shrinks and shrinks.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 05:01 PM
2

It means crude jokes at another person's expense don't need to be dog piled by white knights looking for good boy points. This is the comment section for an article about the entitlement of older women who can't find a "good" man now that they're past their prime. You're going to find some blue material.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 04:51 PM
1

Yep I get that bit. The sheepishness in saying "40 isn't that old" is what gets me.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 04:43 PM
1

People live to 80-90 at most (years less for men). 40 is halfway in between that and much closer to menopause than to a youthful start. Not elderly, but without a doubt still old. No amount of "Ya Ya Sisterhood Traveling Pants Getting Her Groove Back" films and tantrums from post-middle age women will change that.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 04:42 PM
5

I think at the very least the trans experience is illuminating philosophically in regards to society and sex roles. Ally is an ideologically poisoned term though so I'm not sure if I should take that at face value.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 01:12 PM
21

Descriptions of common deceit isn't woman hating. Oversensitive.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 12:59 PM
2

That's half dead what are you on about?
/r/MensRights23/07/17 12:57 PM
1

Ethics aside, that assumes the "right" people are going to take up the incentives. Seems like a policy doomed to fail from the start.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 11:40 PM
1

Depends on state law. I don't know if every state has that stipulation, and even if it had the judge/plea could have made it a misdemeanor in the end.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 11:38 PM
1

I don't want to be a downer, but if we're being specific here a single new shelter is profiled [http://www.familyplace.org/]
/r/MensRights21/07/17 11:37 PM
5

Aside from the very dubious legality, this statement stuck out: This is not sterilization. The female implants last up to three years and men can have vasectomies reversed. These procedures are free of charge to any inmate who wants it. Vasectomies are not guaranteed to be reversed successfully. Their express purpose is for permanent sterilization. Furthermore, even if they had a perfect reversal rate, is the government going to pay for the reversal of the procedure it covered in the first place…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 11:34 PM
2

I wouldn't worry about it. Just be aware in the future if there's any grab-ass/gossip interfering with your ability to work. Good news is it seems multiple people knew it happened so it should be harder to lie about if, heaven forbid, it comes to that.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 11:27 PM
1

Not sure about bang for the buck, but here's a few. Also consider donating to homeless shelters, suicide prevention services, substance abuse services, or veterans services (after doing research on the groups in questions, especially ones pertaining to veterans). Groups helping those with prostate, testicular, lung, or bladder cancer will also likely help a large portion of men if that's what you're interested in. Canadian Association for Equality: http://equalitycanada.com/ || Well-known and ac…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 11:22 PM
1

No, that's what you want to hear. I haven't even typed the word "pedo", so try not to oversimplify what I'm saying to justify being indignant. I explained why people would say that Biden is a creep and that there is more actual proof of misconduct for Biden than Cosby. There is no footage or any other physical evidence that Cosby has done anything. Anyone can watch the footage of Biden.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 07:19 PM
2

If you want to lie about my stated position, so be it.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 07:19 PM
1

http://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/research-projects-and-surveys/miscellaneous/15-year-study/chap4.pdf To elaborate, as I posted from my phone earlier (also note in the document that the discussion on sex disparities is hardly a page long and apologetic to female offenders): Odds of imprisonment are greater in drug offenses for minorities more than other kinds of crime. This peaks at 40% for Hispanic offenders. Males have an over 100% greater odd of imprisonmen…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 07:17 PM
2

I don't think that's true it's based on political affiliation, or at least not a primary factor. The videos of Biden are genuinely creepy, and the discomfort of the subject was clearly visible in at least one sample. In some respects it's more justified with Biden as there is physical evidence. What's different is the alleged victim(s) hasn't sought remedy for harassment. With Cosby, the allegations literally cannot be proven with physical evidence due to the historic nature of the claims. As I …
/r/MensRights19/07/17 06:59 PM
7

What's the sex ratio for the bladder and esophagus cancers?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 12:08 AM
2

Yes, insults are off-topic, but I'm also not surprised you'd catch heat for promoting Biden. The obvious reason is the well-known footage of him, but he was also highly active in the "It's On Us" (It's on Men) campaign that pretty much demonized men as sex predators on campus. I wouldn't take it personally. You have to expect those kinds of comments in that case. Same as defending the trial against Cosby, or even more justifiably the hysteria around Brock Turner when his 15 minutes of hate was s…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 12:06 AM
1

That's the rub, there is no acceptable level of defense for so many people.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:13 PM
3

The film was number one on multiple storefronts for a time. Financially I would hope it's a success at least.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:10 PM
1

Yes it has, Devos has already greatly reduced enforcement of spurious Title IX claims.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 07:59 PM
1

Investigations are already down from the previous administration. It's the policies that need changing now, not the practice day to day.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 07:57 PM
1

The US Sentencing Commission found that racial effects generally only exist for men and that minority women were sentenced more lightly than white women by a small margin. It's much more likely that men are getting the short end of the stick rather than race being a discriminatory factor. The trends weren't consistent enough to prove racial discrimination. Further, this is just describing the outcomes of convicted criminals, not who or why a person is a criminal. As OP said, groups that commit m…
/r/MensRights18/07/17 07:39 PM
5

I'm not aware of that having happened in the MRM community. Given that false accusations are a major topic in said community, I would assume making unfounded claims is frowned upon.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 04:15 PM
1

Micromanaging prude.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 02:46 PM
5

Yeah we had all the rights for a long time You're mistaken on that. For a quite obvious but often ignored example, women have had the right to vote since 1920 without any obligation to the state. They also gained the right to vote at 18 instead of 21 due to young men being drafted into the Vietnam War. Another example would be men's responsibility to pay a woman's debts, false promise of marriage laws, and the lack of putative fatherhood rights until the 1970s. You should read "The Fraud of Femi…
/r/MensRights13/07/17 03:45 PM
1

I don't think that's true. Hasn't California codified the Affirmative Consent standard as law on campus grounds?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 03:40 PM
1

Yes, but still I think a lot of people's response is to go "Yeesh, that's rough." and try to avoid even thinking about circumcision harm. I was the first person to post a comment on the thread when it had already gotten to the front page. So people were upvoting but weren't participating.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 03:34 PM
1

I know what sensational title is going to spread in the media now. She didn't even use the word rape and specifically said a lot of accusations don't allege a rape occurred.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 01:46 PM
2

lol I know right? Fucking licking a stranger?
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:34 AM
15

I don't mean to discourage you, but you may have trouble getting responses on a post like this. It's a very uncomfortable topic, and many other people are not as open to discuss issues they have had with their circumcision. That being said, it would be more helpful for everyone if that were not the case. I would try also posting in /r/Intactivists/, /r/Foregen/, and/or /r/foreskin_restoration/ if you still haven't gotten any responses and you are looking for support or more information. There ma…
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:32 AM
8

Indeed. Several sources, including the SPLC and ThinkProgress, are strongly partisan outlets. The SPLC in particular has thrown credibility to the wind in order to provide timely denouncements of Democratic party opponents.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:21 AM
9

lol what a trash heap of an article but quite good news overall! I'm genuinely surprised to learn of this and hope it is true. Fingers crossed SAVE, NCFM, and FACE all have productive meetings. Wasn't FACE involved in the recent push to pass due process legislation in GA?
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:15 AM
3

Hey, good news. Thanks mods.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:08 AM
1

More or less.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:41 AM
1

Not allowed. There's a lawsuit pending on this matter in addition to the NCFM one.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:39 AM
1

Yes you are correct on Turner. A non-rape pickled in booze.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:35 AM
2

The Lighthouse Project is making progress on aiding individual men and developing support services. You can find it on patreon. Titleixforall.com maintains a lawsuit database that is often used by defense lawyers. CAFE provides support services to men. Florida Dream Center is working on a home for trafficked boys. Supporting one or more would be a good start.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:33 AM
1

Lives with a close relative? They make it sound like everyone is a neck beard. In my case both of my younger brothers rent a house with me while they go to school. That would be three young men in those stats but wouldn't quite suit the narrative.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:28 AM
3

Lol might be racist or sexist.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:22 AM
1

Kid's YouTube channel is linked in the comments. Probably some info there.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:18 AM
1

Eh it's a common phrase. Speaks more to a lack of imagination in coming up with insults.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:16 AM
3

Hard to say it's betraying women when they are complicit in what's going on. They are getting exactly what they either asked for or didn't fight to prevent.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:10 AM
20

Good for them to do the research.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 06:06 AM
1

At face value, some women are bitter they have to have responsibility. The male pill is their way of getting back at men. Like those idiotic stunts where men wear heels or shave their legs. That's why there were "Boo hoo poor men" articles when the medical trials ended.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 03:48 PM
1

I forgot to mention: contact the organization CAFE. They may help you find more info. They were also organizing legal advice workshops.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 03:36 PM
3

Thanks for compiling the data.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 06:58 AM
2

There's always money to be made dangling a carrot in front of eager men.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 06:57 AM
2

Yes, but infanticide laws aren't gendered in regard to victim as I understand.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 06:48 AM
1

Depends on the area. US had taxes on the uninsured.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 06:39 PM
7

Ask a lawyer. Always. It changes based on country, state, and myriad other factors...including the competence of your lawyer. Especially that. For example some states still have lifetime payment of alimony.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 06:33 PM
1

Yeah, I'm not familiar enough with the case law on this topic for CA. Perhaps someone can provide info on this.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 06:30 PM
3

Dr. Tanveer Ahmed talk on Male Suicide via ICMI 2017 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9dasGfxIkHY
/r/MensRights08/07/17 06:28 PM
12

Women rate higher than minors on the victim scale.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 05:01 PM
2

Pretty funny.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:40 PM
7

No law mandating anesthesia in the US I'm aware of. There are laws that mandate anesthesia for animals though...
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:38 PM
3

Yes. It's run by the state and staffed from journalism programs.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 04:33 PM
2

Nothing is to be done aside from promoting posts that are more than click farms. Take a moment to read through the comments of popular posts if you have the time and inform people who bumbled in.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 03:11 AM
1

Not sure about wonderful, but not as bad is some ways that's true.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:48 AM
2

Yahoo owns Tumblr.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:46 AM
18

Best guess is changes in methodology. Seems odd that the rate would drop 6/1000 in one year, then again a year apart. For example, Violent Crime doesn't include murder (can't survey a dead person) which is 80% male victims last I remember (footnote 'a'). This means that the totals will have been lower since at least the 2013 survey. I'm curious to know if there are other changes or reporting definitions that would further affect the data.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 01:39 AM
1

Yes, they will more likely have an easier time, but I think you're downplaying how much preference women get. The current prison population is 93% male. There just aren't enough pretty young white girls to account for the difference. The US Sentencing Commission found that the greatest predictor of being imprisoned was being male, not a person's race. It states: Female Black and Hispanic offenders actually have somewhat lower odds of imprisonment than their White counterparts. While the benefit …
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:16 AM
5

The majority of those who are imprisoned over CS debt are impoverished. The government is asking for money that did not exist, and due to incarceration will never exist. Due to the various means the govt has to take property, assets, paychecks, etc, the automatic enforcement methods are generally only effective at getting payments from those making 40k or more a year. Further compounding the issue is a lack of incentive by the govt to revise support mandates, lack of legal representation for the…
/r/MensRights06/07/17 01:30 AM
2

lol I guess that's true, isn't it?
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:25 PM
7

I don't know enough about Anthony, but the suffragettes as a movement were not interested in equality and did not accomplish equal voting rights for women but extra voting rights for women. You have been misled about the history of the Suffragettes. Their Declaration of Sentiments directly accuse men of oppressing women as tyrants, gave speeches noting the "civilizing effect" of women on warmonger men, opposed voting rights for blacks (see Ida B. Wells), did not fight for women to have the same …
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:21 PM
3

New users, reposters, etc
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:11 PM
2

The former. Every single time a problem affects women, people start caring. Have you seen articles on lamenting the amount of student debt women are collecting while ignoring the fact they are the majority of the students? Look up the research article "Effacing the Male" regarding news coverage of the Kosovo War. In fact, there is precedent. The reason false promise of marriage was dropped as a crime is because it was argued a woman's virginity should not be a property right. NOT because men wer…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:11 PM
5

What makes you say that?
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:06 PM
3

Yeah, fatherhood by marriage is true etc, but I don't see the title material either.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 08:12 PM
2

Pretty crazy isn't it? A split vote on protecting due process rights...
/r/MensRights02/07/17 02:59 PM
1

Thank you for the information. It is against the US constitution as well, but is only acknowledged as a possible argument in an ongoing lawsuit by NCFM against the Selective Service System. Good luck to the Dutch. Maybe, but saying that women should not have the right to vote because they cannot be conscripted, whereas until now the majority of politicians is and has been male and they did not change the issue of women not being drafted, seems lewd to me. While I have no issue being an MRA, then…
/r/MensRights02/07/17 02:56 PM
1

Not bad at all.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 02:16 PM
7

An improvement on indefinite incarceration. Interesting that there's no program included to get mother's/custodial parents to develop parental or financial responsibility as well.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 02:12 PM
2

I get that. Why should the govt tax to create this system? And is justification for it being gender neutral a central point of the system or a side effect of pushing for more benefits for women?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 02:07 PM
1

Would a person rather work at a job for 8 hours a day or spend 8 hours with their children whom they love dearly? Would the men who died at work or mothers working part-time to pay bills rather stay home instead?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 05:04 AM
3

These dudes get around, damn.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:58 AM
3

She is a black woman allegedly beat by three officers unlawfully. Lawyers all over the country would commit murder to take that case if she voluntarily decided to forego the settlement. She made poor choices unfortunately.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:51 AM
1

There's things like unconstitutional prior restraints on speech (National Security Letter) and there's agreement to not speak after the fact (settlement terms). The latter is fully legal.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:49 AM
1

Case of grandparents cutting child has publicity.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:44 AM
1

Hypergamy aka "Where have the good men gone?"
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:41 AM
1

The term is hypergamy.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:41 AM
1

Politics or lawyers, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:39 AM
1

FB helped condemn a guy to death for blasphemy by reporting him to the govt. They are sick.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:37 AM
1

Lol I promise to make water wet!
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:30 AM
1

Could you send me a link to the passage of the bill? I'm having issues finding a source that confirms the bill has passed, only ones from 2016 saying it will happen. This is something that has happened in the US when we had a bill pass on integration that was replaced to only create a committee to do "research" on the topic for three years. While I approve of the defense minister integrating registration, I still believe that a popular vote among women would not have gotten the same result. And …
/r/MensRights02/07/17 04:03 AM
2

What's the justification for govt leave? Isn't that up to the employer and employee? Seems like a push solely for women and men are added to avoid legal liability.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:50 AM
1

GA tried to legislate a mandate on police reporting but I don't think it's passed.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:49 AM
21

Not sure. Are there stories on BuzzFeed about leaving your dick hard and leaking? Never been to the site.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:47 AM
3

It's possible, but they would have to be functionally anonymous afterwards. Not aware of any stories.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:46 AM
1

Who made that argument?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:43 AM
3

Hm he has a rather charitable theory on why FGM was legislated separately. A reasonable theory that nonetheless describes a callous way of thinking.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:33 AM
2

No refunds!
/r/MensRights02/07/17 03:21 AM
9

In January, a panel of college presidents said they would uphold the Obama-era guidance even if Trump’s OCR overturned it. I'm so sick of these losers.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:46 PM
1

They aren't voting to integrate the selective service, nor have they done so for 100 years. So that wouldn't change. What would change is the establishment of voting rights based on the expectation of service to the country. We can have the whole female suffrage discussion again and see how many women really want the vote if it means registering. If it's anything like the original discussion, it won't be a clean vote "yes".
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:40 PM
3

If you want to talk caricatures, why sensationalize what I said? I didn't say it was evil. I gave you an accurate description of the opposite of feminism based on previous activism, laws, and cultural impact. Whether it is accepted is irrelevant. (which fewer and fewer people accept it every day) The fact that a bad idea is accepted doesn't mean that idea is itself acceptable. They have not had their terrible history and terrible ideas exposed to a great enough extent. And this will not happen i…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:34 PM
1

It was a comment on faithfulness to the tribe in relation to in-group bias of women compared to men.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:18 PM
1

I want to be clear: I do not oppose women's suffrage as a principle. I oppose women's suffrage as it is implemented. So yes, the fact that women don't register means women shouldn't vote, whether I want them to vote or not. I would prefer that selective service is abolished or integrated. But until that happens (which will take at minimum another 3 years) they maintain a special status as citizens with no obligation to the state granted by default at age 18. And might I also point out that the v…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 06:26 PM
8

I would like you to produce an actual argument rather than just "See what I mean!" The MRM has not produced discriminatory laws or damaging cultural narratives in pursuit of a supremacist goal in which one sex is responsible for the evils of the world. It cannot be referred to, therefore, as the other side of the coin to feminism. Women's rights would be the flip side of the coin to the MRM, not the ideology of feminism. The whole reason laws like the Violence Against Women Act, the Istanbul Con…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 06:12 PM
1

https://www.sss.gov/Registration/Who-Must-Register/Men-With-Disabilities If your son is not confined to an institution or homebound (completely bed bound), he is required to register. Depending on the condition of the young man, while he would not be able to serve in the military in a crisis, it does not exempt him from the Selective Service registration requirement. Even though this may not seem to make any sense, the facts are neither the Military Selective Service Act nor the Presidential pro…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:58 PM
4

I think it's doing better every day. CAFE just raised $80k for a new men's center this year. As such organizations grow, so to will the message, and so to will the network of those with the talents to help. Spreading the facts and message will do more than you think. My state just tried to change the definition of rape this year to include victims of women. Perhaps next year it will go through.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:17 PM
3

I haven't watched any of that material, but it's quite clear that women like women and men like women. I don't see reciprocity on a grand scale. There's no way things like the White Feather Campaign could exist if women cared about men the same way men do about women.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:11 PM
4

You mean voting rights without the obligation to register for Selective Service...? In 1868 at the Women's Suffrage Convention in Washington, D.C., Elizabeth Cady Stanton, at age 52, gave a powerful speech which begins as such: "I urge a sixteenth amendment, because 'manhood suffrage,' or a man's government, is civil, religious, and social disorganization. The male element is a destructive force, stern, selfish, aggrandizing, loving war, violence, conquest, acquisition, breeding in the material …
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:07 PM
6

Complaining about feminism and what needs to change are often the same thing. It's quite hard to discuss the Violence Against Women Act or Duluth Model without discussing feminism.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:03 PM
7

Ironically, I think it is women who are most likely to truly care about all men. The same way they'll care about whales, and chicken, and the environment. I laughed at first, then was sad because wales and chicken rate higher than sons :( When we try to make the Men's Rights Movement emotional, we gravitate towards hate. And it really shows on the front page of /r/MensRights I don't doubt that there is some hate somewhere, but be cognizant of conflating anger, the emotion broadly, with hate, tha…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:00 PM
4

all the MRA needs to do is continually insist that "The MRM is not opposed to feminism. They are two sides of the same coin." The other side of the same coin is male supremacism, not men's rights activism. Furthermore, that's a straight up lie and makes it seem as though the MRM endorses, for example, the consistent attacks by NOW on shared parenting and alimony reform. It's GOOD to be counter to feminists because they have a clear history of misdeeds. Point them out at every chance and they'll …
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:54 PM
1

You state "women shouldnt vote because xyz" but fail to state the reasons provided. There's at least one good reason in the US women should not have the same voting rights as men: Selective Service registration. Furthermore, it should also be a point to examine the voting trends of women and how that has impacted governance. If those trends and impacts are contrary to a person's view of effective governance, then they would have a valid reason to oppose women's suffrage. Whether you agree with i…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:49 PM
7

I think the establishment of councils to serve particular demographics is inappropriate to begin with. If the women's council is cut, it will be the removal (hopefully) of another feminist outpost in government. As the point of establishing the men's council was to contest the influence of the women's (feminist's) council, I don't have any issue with dropping the topic. I think relying on councils to get anything done is much less effective that pursuing the issues on an individual and distribut…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:34 PM
13

Traditional perks such as: The Draft alimony/child support without custody (Custody of Children Act) same judicial and enforcement biases against men (research how many men vs women were hanged to death, for example) false promise of marriage as a crime (was changed because virginity was ruled as invalid for property rights, not because men were being jailed) lack of parental rights for unwed men (until 1970 in the US) steady deterioration of family law to favor women Every perk of traditionalis…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:19 PM
15

Apparently not given the state of men's rights today. Seems as though they're largely either cowed into deferring to women or happily white knight for social brownie points.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:11 PM
1

In regard to gays, yes. In regard to female rapists, as a side effect. If you look at the "It's On Us" campaign to get the FBI UCR definition changed to remove the force requirement, you'll see it's entirely focused on men as rapists.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:09 PM
1

Why did the last US census report that over 80% of custodial parents are women then?
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:04 PM
1

You have just described the current issues with the family law as it stands, except instead of starting with the idea that both parents should have contact, the presumption is that the mother should have full custody by default. Why is it okay to allow official or unofficial preference in favor of mothers but not okay to start with the idea that both parents should get shared custody and going from there?
/r/MensRights21/06/17 12:27 AM
2

This type of post is made every year...
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:27 PM
1

Ah but you don't understand that phrase the same (traditional) way. Making a man uphold responsibility to woman and child IS family first to some people. Just as disarmament of all civilians is pro-safety, or government hiring quotas is pro-equality. Also do know that Scott's daughter was in the process of divorce, and both R and D approved the bill. You make a valid point, but this particular instance speaks more to Scott's motives than the parties.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:24 AM
1

I would say it is due to lumping historical events with the prominent advocates and what they advocated.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:15 AM
1

As I understand, the ERA was promoted by former suffragists (not suffragettes). It was opposed by traditionalist/conservative groups lead by schlafly, as well as labor feminists who did not want to undo the priveledges granted to working women.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:09 AM
1

Cdc Ncvs? Or maybe the CDC partner violence survey actually.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 02:59 AM
3

No, it was a rebuttable presumption in Florida as a starting point. Not a default ruling. You should also research bulletins from NOW dating to the 1990s in which they explicitly stated opposition to shared parenting. This has been a consistent point of opposition for many years.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 02:53 AM
9

Get Bob to create an account on titleixforall.com and browse similar cases. For the site and its database to Bob's lawyer.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 02:42 AM
1

Then they should pursue a civil, not criminal case. Like the family of OJs alleged victim.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 02:39 AM
0

Iirc California changed (removed) the statute of limitations on these kinds of cases...last year?
/r/MensRights18/06/17 02:37 AM
0

They only asked 20? Sounds more like they found 20 gay guys than a representative sample. Honestly, kissing?
/r/MensRights16/06/17 02:00 PM
1

Touched where though? Need to see the reporting standards.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:47 AM
1

The country in which both sexes have it bad will likely be more equal, but thats at extreme poverty by Western standards.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:45 AM
1

Sweden held a false rape case against Assange for many years.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:43 AM
1

In which EU countries do the defense field testimonies that a) the woman was too horny to say no b) the child rapist didn't understand the word no (multiple cases) c) the adolescent rape victim was harrassed at school by the rapist and relatives with little intervention? Which country had parents arrested while trying to rescue their daughter from rape gangs? Or arresting rape victims for disorderly conduct to avoid being racist?
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:42 AM
1

Titleixforall.com (formerly men and boys in education)
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:34 AM
1

Can someone explain the part on instructing the jury? Sounds like special pleading, but I don't know the rules on juries and such.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:33 AM
2

But how it plays....
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:29 AM
2

Since when would notch associate with the likes of her? He's been based for years now...
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:28 AM
1

Same state that passed mandatory minimums for sex assault over non-rape Brock Turner. Sure won't help with the incarceration rate.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:23 AM
1

Is Dr Oz, Dr Phil, Maury, Jerry Springer, etc counted as fake news? Are telenovelas known for being loved by those with discriminating tastes?
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:12 AM
1

Separatists seem to have largely vanished from Feminism, although perhaps they're taking refuge in LGBT.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:08 AM
1

Hypocrisy almost certainly.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:55 AM
1

Never thought a woman would lie in GA...?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:53 AM
1

Look up Earnest Belfort Bax. There were critics of Feminism in the late 1800s
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:10 AM
1

Cynical: would people pay more or less attention to over incarceration if women were 90% of inmates? Can a demographic easily ignore problems it has little danger of facing?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:06 AM
2

I'm surprised they were worse to Cassie, in part due to her association with Elam.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:50 AM
1

They threw the whole book at him. Racist, sexist, hates the disabled, etc.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:41 AM
3

Lol amazing last words there from Cassie
/r/MensRights11/06/17 03:42 PM
3

Feminists take the MRM more seriously? Doesn't seem like a good use of time.
/r/MensRights03/06/17 01:28 PM
1

Martyrs of Marriage for an Indian perspective
/r/MensRights03/06/17 01:15 PM
1

Sounds like a mess. Of course she wants to be friends again. She can't fix her own house.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 02:41 PM
4

Nz has a special offense for assault against a woman iirc
/r/MensRights02/06/17 02:36 PM
14

Well...if we're being honest it's how she harmed her own relationship.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 02:22 PM
1

Yeah, and then when the point about domestic terrorists is mentioned it's always about abortion center bombings and no mention the Weather Underground bombers or Black Panther murders.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:48 PM
2

Well, supporting Hamas could be called anti-semitism, but I don't think supporting Palestine is unless you're saying that all the jews need to be evicted or something. But I am not that well versed on the scenario with Israel so maybe I am wrong I'm not rock solid on the issue either. The main issue is that there are actual terrorists who are being welcomed into the US left, and have been for a while. Rasmea Odeh is one of the most recent and was responsible for a grocery store bombing. I have n…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 02:50 AM
1

Well, the anti-semitism from the left is due in part to supporting Palestine/Hamas and generally ignoring the anti-jew intolerance coming from muslim countries. In the context of identity politics, muslims are one of the top tier victim groups which means jews (and women, and gays, and christians) don't get consideration when they are wronged by muslims.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 02:14 AM
3

Depends. Globally, no. Christianity doesn't promote male genital cutting. However, in the US, the idea that masturbation should be curbed may have come from Christianity and that was the justification of mgm in early days. In the US it is not done for religious reasons unless someone is Jewish or Muslim.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 02:02 AM
4

lawyer-turned-software developer ...What? Perfect example of some busybody coming in to impose their opinion on everyone else.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 06:37 PM
1

No, not really. But if you value equality then they are, because gender roles by definition segregate the sexes, and discriminate. Segregation is not bad in and of itself. If the sexes self-segregate through gender roles, so be it. In fact, men could do with more segregation these days as every group they form is inevitable co-opted or abolished. They don't generally have their own spaces to be men and among men outside of certain workplaces. Discrimination is a fuzzy word, so I don't know your …
/r/MensRights31/05/17 03:56 PM
1

Text of the Proposed Bill SB 145 Credit where it's due, all the Senators involved in drafting the bill were Democrats. One of those was Amari Fennoy, a junior at Spelman who said she was shocked to find out about Georgia’s definition of rape. She heard about it, she said, when she learned of a male student who had been sexually violated but could not file a rape charge. The separate laws may indicate that these are not equal offenses, Fennoy said. “It says that a woman’s violation is more import…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:00 AM
1

Your post is bizarre because it seems like you are someone who supports equality, and who also supports gender roles. These are two antithetical mindsets, you can't have both. I disagree, with the only caveat that in today's legal structure traditional roles are unequal. Otherwise, people are free to divide their time and energy as they see fit. In which case, most of the time the man will work and the woman will care for children. This is what traditional roles are. Gender roles aren't inherent…
/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:54 AM
5

Are there any articles/press releases/court documents? Also, are they reinstated pending the court decision or have they been acquitted?
/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:55 AM
2

Has anyone noticed that the proceeds go to Planned Parenthood? This is a political event in disguise...
/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:44 AM
6

Perhaps they got a bit brave and decided to go after a mother for a change.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 08:55 PM
3

It's a reasonable question for me. I don't mind answering. New people may wonder the same thing.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 08:49 PM
6

Perpetrator was easily able to just push both cops to the ground and resist arrest. If physical standards were higher for female cops (which means equal to men) then perhaps the encounter would not have been so one-sided and put not just the cops and citizens in danger, but also the perpetrator in danger. If physical strength can't subdue a perp, what is left other than taser or, even worse, firearms? It only took one guy with a good choke hold to diffuse the situation, yet multiple guys came in…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 07:48 PM
1

No problem, still a shit situation for the guy. Just wanted to clarify since people often don't read the articles.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 11:50 PM
1

I find it hard to believe she is moderate, at least in the same sense as what a moderate passes for in other religions. Relative to most muslims she may be, but not by the standards of the US. Partly due to her (multiple, consistent) public comments and endorsements, such as Rasmea Yousef Odeh the convicted bomber. She stated that Muhammad was "a human rights activist, a racial justice activist, an environmental justice activist...he was an animal rights activist. He was a feminist in his own ri…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 11:49 PM
1

Wasn't it Texas where frats were being vandalized and slandered to the point of instigating a stabbing death this year?
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:30 PM
1

Lol you won dude. They didn't have an argument so their only option was to try and keep you from talking again. Good for you.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:28 PM
2

Justin from Canada is a sad joke.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:18 PM
1

Lol too dangerous
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:16 PM
1

FYI the swedish prosecutor brought charges against assange rather than the two women going for them
/r/MensRights28/05/17 08:07 PM
10

To answer the question, no, not necessarily.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:58 PM
16

Third time in a year if it passes. They already removed the statute of limitations and introduced mandatory minimums last year.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:55 PM
2

Sarsour is one. She spoke at CUNY and the pussy March early this year.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:47 PM
1

Title is literally correct, but may be misconstrued as him getting $75 as compensation. It's not. His full compensation is contingent on annulling his conviction.
/r/MensRights28/05/17 07:41 PM
1

Not really. The "dark side" of the MRM are internet posters while the "dark side" of feminism lobbies against shared parenting law and attacks cathedrals (and their peaceful defenders) on a yearly schedule. Big difference.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:54 PM
1

Ask a lawyer in your area. It varies from state to state, both in the Common Law Marriage aspect and the "acting as the father" aspect.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 04:46 PM
1

Do it anyways, to anyone not just women. The response will vary and it's easier to shrug off when an uninteresting stranger doesn't respond.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:47 PM
1

It's funny to see the very small numbers of 2-5 star ratings, then the jump at 1 star.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:40 PM
1

Didn't a govt prosecutor actually torture men by like cutting their skin and stuff? I remember an article on that some time ago...
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:33 PM
1

Good luck to you! I hope there will be a write up or video.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:30 PM
1

No problem, presenting a reason in favor of the sticky.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:29 PM
2

Still in progress I suppose, probably takes a long time to sue the government.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:28 PM
1

lol that's what I was thinking. MRAs at PrideFest? That takes a bit of courage. Cross your fingers people don't start blowing farts at the event staff to get Rocky Mountain MRA kicked off the roster.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 12:20 AM
3

Part of creating a community of activists is promoting in-person meetings and networking. Shaking hands, planning, and commiserating face to face isn't something to ignore. If someone wants to spend their money to promote such a practice, or even simply to meet HBR in person, it's their business to do so.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 12:18 AM
2

Ncfm filed suit a year or so ago, without the support of Now or any others.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 08:25 PM
2

New Zealand has a crime of assault against a female iirc
/r/MensRights20/05/17 08:14 PM
3

Oh please.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:28 PM
3

It's within the gender as a social construct/leftist power grab umbrella. So tangentially related I guess.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:03 PM
2

Yes, the answer to this observation is "So what?" given the clear sources of the difference.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:57 PM
1

We have been able as a society to mitigate many other antisocial evolutionary/natural behavior. Hopefully the same will happen here with increased awareness.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:49 PM
9

Infighting is inevitable and hopefully leads to introspection.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:33 PM
1

I've probably learned more just by reading the comments when various topics pop up. There are some people here who are great references on certain topics. If you post a specific question you'll likely get several comments with various references to historical accounts, research, or informative articles. Hannah Wallen has a great blog on the topic of men's issues and has posted many, many articles/blogs of interest on her twitter account as well. What are some big time statistics that you can thr…
/r/MensRights12/05/17 08:16 PM
2

2011
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:43 PM
20

No they weren't. There's cases from well before 2011, including one from 2007, a full 4 years prior. A date range search on google shows many examples previous to 2011. 2010: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sexting-leads-to-child-porn-charges-for-teens/ "Take a photograph of yourself or somebody else nude and send it to somebody else, you've committed the crime," said Perry County District Attorney Charles Chenot, who has prosecuted two sexting cases involving a total of 10 minors in the past year. …
/r/MensRights09/05/17 08:42 PM
1

Ah thanks.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 03:21 AM
3

As far as sales, not that I'm aware. The only data I know is from the Kickstarter which needed $97k for post-production, eventually gaining $211,260 when the campaign ended. Based on updates from the KS, that money (at least up to the 175k mark) was spent on production. So sales would have to be over 200k for the film to be making money as filming costs/etc had already been accrued before the Kickstarter was opened.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 01:37 AM
3

Why ignore the new people coming up and organizations like CAFE? NCFM is still around as well, although I haven't heard any updates on their Selective Service case recently.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 01:24 AM
10

I'm guessing some vague lie, that makes them a victim - like "it promotes rape" or "it promotes violence against women, the worst kind of violence". Am I close? That's pretty much it, yeah. It's the strategy #1 with just about everything.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 01:22 AM
7

Run time is part of it. She had a lot of material to cover on the issues already, which is why important topics like circumcision only had a few moments in the film.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 01:20 AM
3

I'm not entirely sure what's going on in this story. Neither parent gets custody, but they should be getting damages due to the CPS mistakes?
/r/MensRights09/05/17 01:18 AM
1

... people would believe that??? Hysterics turned up to 11, shit...
/r/MensRights08/05/17 12:00 AM
1

Well, this sub gained over 10k subs over the past year so that's something.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 11:30 PM
8

No, it's a reference to the Matrix (Blue Pill vs Red Pill). The doc explains the title, and also goes through the differences between MRA, MGTOW, TRP/Pick up Artist (the "Manosphere").
/r/MensRights07/05/17 06:41 PM
6

Yeah, someone told me they didn't like how a Snickers tastes anymore and stopped buying Snickers. What a loser!
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:59 PM
30

It's a documentary. Does a good job at portraying men's issues. It's a great first entry for to get an understanding of the issues.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:58 PM
9

Documentary, good job at portraying men's issues. It's a great first entry for "normies" to get an understanding of many of the issues. Only complaint is that it doesn't go too much in depth on any one issue, but as a survey it addresses almost all of them.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:55 PM
2

Yeah, I thought she was funny at first but there hasn't been much to differentiate her from other people in the "slutty female comic" genre. Gets boring.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:53 PM
1

Why? Because it refutes the tale of the noble suffragette.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 12:05 AM
1

She talks about MRA/MGTOW/PUA in the film.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 11:53 PM
1

That's not entirely true. There are some bad things like pandering to women business owners, but there's also good things like cutting off funding for the global women's office or whatever its called this past week. In addition, various policies can have a positive knock-on effect for men in particular although I wouldn't lump those into him being pro-MRA or supporting men's issues.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 11:48 PM
2

Your first post said that the poster was about women's reproductive rights. Such rights, generally in the context of abortion, do not exist in a vacuum. As such, the next user commented (a bit to the side of the issue) that women have a right to force men into parenthood. When asked to clarify, I commented that this is true, even to the extent that a woman can rape a man or male minor and he will still be accountable for child support (and reimbursement of state welfare awarded to the mother). T…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:18 PM
3

Is this similar or different to the reproductive options available to men and male minors?
/r/MensRights05/05/17 05:55 PM
1

If only it were just bitching.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 05:54 PM
1

I don't think they are barred anymore, or at least they are implementing an integration plan at the moment. This is why NCFM was able to bring suit against the Selective Service for sex-segregation a year or so ago.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 05:51 PM
3

(men can't choose, male rape victims can't choose, male minors can't choose...)
/r/MensRights05/05/17 05:49 PM
2

Women vote for male politicians. Women are split on abortion. There was a pro-life march right after the pussy march this year comparable in size.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 05:46 PM
1

Rip human rights in that case lol
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:48 AM
1

Like Champs in the AUS military...
/r/MensRights04/05/17 07:21 PM
2

This is a real position in feminist discourse, not a one off. Why Gay Men Don't Need Feminism Part 1: Challenging Assumptions Part 2: The Takeover Here is an excerpt from a speech he gave at the 4th Gay Academic Union Conference in the city of New York back in 1976: I remember a number of such [disruptions] in the early days of the Gay Liberation Front, in the fall of 1969. Women we had never seen before would come in and deliver tirades against the GLF men; they would say that not only were gay…
/r/MensRights04/05/17 04:17 PM
1

Well heck I wouldn't worry then.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 08:28 PM
2

Because it is systemic. It's literally the result of government intervention in college policy. The Dear Colleague Letter from the Federal Department of Education Office for Civil Rights threatened the funding of colleges if they didn't pursue more cases, and legal standards be damned. In addition, the letter itself may have been issued illegally because it did not pass through comment and notice procedure while still making policy proscriptions to colleges.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 07:00 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/68xjn2/a_guy_was_unconcious_and_a_girl_unzipped_his/dh2hbix/
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:56 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/68xjn2/a_guy_was_unconcious_and_a_girl_unzipped_his/dh2hbix/
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:56 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/68xjn2/a_guy_was_unconcious_and_a_girl_unzipped_his/dh2hbix/
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:56 PM
1

Now if I would have been able to consent I would have said yes, but the option was out of my hands. Does this constitute rape? I don't mean to be alarmist, but it really depends on how reasonable the police are if she decided to file a complaint. What if I would have gotten her pregnant, what kind of ramifications then? All the ramifications basically. There's no such thing as parental abdication for men. Even if she hid the kid from you for years, she could show up and claim both back pay child…
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:56 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/68xjn2/a_guy_was_unconcious_and_a_girl_unzipped_his/dh2hbix/
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:53 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/68xjn2/a_guy_was_unconcious_and_a_girl_unzipped_his/dh2hbix/
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:52 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/68xjn2/a_guy_was_unconcious_and_a_girl_unzipped_his/dh2hbix/
/r/MensRights03/05/17 06:50 PM
1

The point is to stop discriminating based on sex (wherever possible and feasible), so it doesn't matter if someone is trans or not as ideally the law wouldn't make that distinction to begin with.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 08:55 PM
7

Routine infant circumcision to be specific. There is a medical case if say phimosis treatments aren't effective, but to do it as a default isn't appropriate.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 01:35 AM
3

There's also the option of creating a slit in the foreskin to open it rather than complete removal.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 01:23 AM
2

Those already have funding. To what level must that be increased? Birth control is widely available as it is.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 06:44 PM
4

What amount of government intervention would be required to control the birthrate of free people?
/r/MensRights28/04/17 03:05 PM
1

The affirmatives are regarding wars and that's about it (and the worth of conscripts is also under question). Unless you want to argue the "benefits" under current law and not the merits of those laws. (If you register you get student aid vs why do you have to register for student aid but women don't)
/r/MensRights27/04/17 03:21 PM
1

There was also his opposition to the Istanbul Convention, and rightly so.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 03:11 PM
4

http://arclaw.org/sites/default/files/svoboda-adler-van-howe-circumcision-unethical-unlawful-ethical-legal-issues-pediatrics-journal-law-medicine-ethics-summer-2016.pdf
/r/MensRights27/04/17 03:06 PM
7

There's valid points on why WEP could lose, but the whole thing is spinning a narrative about Davies. His attempts to derail legislation to protect victims of domestic violence, We know about the tripe that is the Istanbul Convention. It's sexist and damaging to victims and offenders that seek help. his views that employers should be able to pay disabled people less, There's legitimate arguments as to why disabled should be allowed to seek lower pay, and legitimate arguments against. and what so…
/r/MensRights27/04/17 02:53 PM
3

I would enjoy that. However, you'd have to really really publicize the patreon for this to work. Part of doing so could include having him as a guest on various youtube talk shows such as Dave Rubin, Steven Molyneux, etc who have a wide reach and are willing to speak on these topics. I mention this publicity because, despite Warren's popularity, this community is rather tight with its wallet as demonstrated by previous fundraising efforts. It would be good to broaden reach if funding is required…
/r/MensRights27/04/17 02:44 PM
3

I would debate should be as it seems the entire offense is sending inappropriate text messages to a minor. 5 years in jail, registration, and treatment is more than enough punishment for such a thing.
/r/MensRights27/04/17 02:37 PM
2

Are there any groups that provide representation to abused minors in your area? Have you contacted any lawyers?
/r/MensRights27/04/17 02:33 PM
3

Hovater further testified that approximately two months later he had had a conversation with T.M. in which she told him that she had had sex with S.F. while he was passed out and that it had "saved her a trip to the sperm bank." S.F. presented testimony from two other witnesses who testified that they had heard T.M. brag about having sex with S.F. while he was passed out. Well that's fucked. http://al.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.19961122_0042048.AL.htm/qx
/r/MensRights27/04/17 02:24 PM
2

http://honeybadgerbrigade.com/ http://www.womenagainstpaternityfraud.org/ http://arclaw.org/ -- pursue anti-MGM/FGM policy http://www.floridadreamcenter.org/ -- opening a shelter for trafficked boys http://nofamilyviolence.webs.com/services -- run a men's shelter http://www.titleixforall.com/ -- Title IX lawsuit database
/r/MensRights27/04/17 02:19 PM
2

Good luck to him. It would be a shame if a literal quota hire shrew like Phillips were re-elected.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 11:03 PM
9

I don't know to what extent he signed anything. In the case of Dear Colleague, Biden would not have had to sign anything as those "recommendations" were published directly by the federal Dept of Education Office for Civil Rights. Which was potentially illegal given the impact of the letter and their bypassing of notice and comment requirements for regulations.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 05:23 PM
3

I believe Hannity is also under some kind of scrutiny for similar claims now. Some are saying it's a concerted effort to target people, which is in part corroborated by Media Matters emails praising their efforts at targeting O'Reilly's advertisers etc.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 03:35 PM
13

Yes, the World Economic Forum report on inequality is total bunk. It only records men doing better as inequality and ignores aspects in which women do better.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 03:28 PM
15

So rich coming from this creepy bastard...
/r/MensRights24/04/17 03:25 PM
2

I was the only one who fought the instructors on basically every point, afterwards a lot of people thought the whole thing was bullshit Good on you dude.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 03:20 PM
12

The uncertain origin of "suppressed memories" is well known, in part due to the satanism/child abuse hysteria in the 90s during which children were convinced of memories that were falsehoods.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 03:17 PM
9

I understand you may be passionate and angry, but saying things like "cuck", " stupid bitch", and being a sexist asshole hurts our movement. "I understand, but don't do it because I and imaginary people don't like it." Well then you don't understand then do you? Otherwise you wouldn't tell people with legitimate reasons to be angry to not be angry. It's not up to you how people express themselves. Furthermore, "cuck" isn't sexist. You're inclusion of that word as being triggering for you most li…
/r/MensRights24/04/17 03:13 PM
2

I disagree in many ways, but at a basic level that's an impractical idea due to voting demographics.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 03:04 AM
1

Look up: 1838 Custody of Children Act Suffragette Bombings Feminist Opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment Mary Koss, 1 in 5, and the justification for erosion of due process rights for male students National Organization for Women lobbying against shared custody/alimony reform in Florida within the past two years.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 03:01 AM
4

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3363227/New-trial-ordered-Denver-man-imprisoned-28-years.html He was only released decades later due to someone writing him a confession letter.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 07:18 PM
2

There's something going on with that guy, enough material for at least a psychology conference, or maybe two. lol I've watched a lot of his videos, and that really did jump out at me. I'm like, hold up, I have a lot of questions now.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 03:56 AM
90

This is like condemning someone for something someone they are associated with did in a dream. Uh, that actually happened. Clarence Moses-El was convicted of a rape based in part on testimony that the victim saw him in a dream. Luckily he was exonerated many years later.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 03:47 AM
1

A bit late to change course, but good points overall.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 03:43 AM
9

Which mainstream left parties are not interested in identity politics?
/r/MensRights19/04/17 05:42 PM
1

Just to pick on the title, what health benefits does signing a contract confer that cohabitation does not?
/r/MensRights16/04/17 06:53 PM
2

Doubtful. Who will care for infrastructure?
/r/MensRights16/04/17 06:48 PM
5

If you can find that in the source footage it stands. That isn't a fox affiliated channel or video.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 06:35 PM
3

Explain #1, #2 is hyperbole.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 06:30 PM
1

To my family, yes. It went fine. Got my dad and stepmom to see The Red Pill in DC.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 06:28 PM
1

This author has a body of work on this topic it seems.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 06:23 PM
1

Personally, it wouldn't care about how I'm perceived in such conversations as you will never give them enough qualifiers to make them comfortable. And in fact, what you're saying should make them uncomfortable, otherwise you'd be agreeing.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 05:49 PM
1

Come now, I'm pro those things as well but that's not what this place is.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 05:40 PM
2

Feminist violence? What a surprise!
/r/MensRights16/04/17 05:34 PM
5

Silver lining is perhaps this can strengthen legal avenues of challenging mgm
/r/MensRights16/04/17 05:18 PM
2

Okay Rico Suave sure it is.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 05:16 PM
9

To be fair, not all of them were actually convicted of an offense. Seems like part hypocrisy, part sjw eating their own.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 11:47 PM
2

They hid the data by labelling it "made to penetrate". The CDC summaries and press releases only reference rape, which only means people raped by men. The CDC isn't good on this topic.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 11:38 PM
2

Same as UK and US (Georgia and Idaho)
/r/MensRights14/04/17 11:34 PM
4

Yes it is possible. Manual stimulation of the vagina/clitoris or just clitoris can occur during a rape. Similarly, some men orgasm from anal penetration rather than masturbation. I don't think rape only involves a single sex act in most cases.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 11:19 PM
3

The campaign, headed in part by Biden, focused entirely on removing the "forcible" part of the rape definition and including gay men. The possibility of men raped by women being included was an accident born of the way the UCR definition was written. Without FBI confirmation, one wouldn't be able to tell if men were included.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 11:15 PM
2

Testimony stated there was some tissue removal, likely the hood.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 02:07 PM
28

Wtf
/r/MensRights14/04/17 02:05 PM
2

Feminism is about gynocentrism run amok, not political ideology. Not political? What is the patriarchy if not western capitalism? They don't have anything to say about other infamous patriarchal cultures. Why do feminist groups support all the leftist political stances like "immigrant rights" and "anti-islamophobia"? It's political. Also, I don't remember Bax writing about the working class etc in "The Fraud of Feminism" nor are socialist politics the core of the MRM. In contrast, feminism has w…
/r/MensRights13/04/17 09:35 PM
5

Not at all. That being said, it's good to be cautious in certain situations like private work meetings, around drunk women, etc. Staying away from drama queens is different from running from women.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 09:25 PM
5

lol that's good i suppose, but also reminds me of the sensational "Baby Fight Club" story from...last year?
/r/MensRights12/04/17 09:02 PM
11

More likely serious traditionalists.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 08:57 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHcQ_gx5bbk
/r/MensRights10/04/17 08:20 PM
6

The reported rates, as stated by the CDC I believe, were highest among lesbian and bisexual women. Gays were the lowest.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 08:19 PM
1

Good catch. Bunching statistics can be an obvious tell for obscuring data.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 08:17 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHcQ_gx5bbk
/r/MensRights10/04/17 08:14 PM
6

Perhaps they should have said that the narrative surrounding deadbeats is a myth. Of course they do exist, but the fact of the matter is most deadbeats would never, ever, EVER have been able to pay in the first place. That's why their called "turnips" by child support workers ("You can't squeeze blood from a turnip.") If the parents had stayed together, the whole family would still be on government welfare. The father hasn't left because he's running to a private island. He was poor before the b…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 08:02 PM
3

Because people don't stand up for what are viewed as social outcasts.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 07:52 PM
2

I think you're correct. Progressive and liberal refer to the same groups, but the terms are used by different people in a lot of cases. I should have said progressive instead of liberal in that context.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 06:18 PM
7

There's a lot of things to address here. First, the MRM is most definitely a response to feminism. There's no getting around it or sugar coating it. Nor should you. NOW has opposed shared parenting for decades and feminist policies like the Custody of Children Act were made to harm men back in the late 1800s. Feminism is not good, and it has to be countered. Second, what is "liberal feminism"? "Liberals" in the US are not "liberal" in the actual sense of the word. It's a marketing term just like…
/r/MensRights08/04/17 09:38 PM
5

Pretty sure bars can't ban pregnant women from drinking in all areas.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 08:58 PM
9

Yeah, pretty much. If you want an example of why feminism is not the right movment for improving human rights, look to India. They have a serious issue with feminist policies there.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 08:55 PM
1

The PM must be racist then. /s
/r/MensRights05/04/17 07:55 PM
1

Contact CALM (campaign against living miserably) or the Mankind Initiative. They may have info for you.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 06:45 PM
2

Read the comments mate.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 06:17 PM
1

What are the nonreport rates for other crimes and the circumstances of nonreport rapes? Rapes include drunk sex, which a person may not report. This is different from conscious, forced sex. It's important not to make the same classification mistakes as Mary Koss.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 07:35 AM
1

Alcohol definitely does not help. It's easy pickings​ for both legitimate and illegitimate sex abuse claims. As far as manners are concerned, people are being taught manners. The problem is it's manners as dictated by the above greivance industry, supported by PC authoritarians.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 07:25 AM
1

Only men can be charged with rape. Statute 16-6-1 I believe. Specifically references use of a penis on a female.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 07:18 AM
3

Why is this in MR?
/r/MensRights02/04/17 07:14 AM
1

No I had to do it myself.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 07:13 AM
1

Ideally there wouldn't be, but i think the nature of men leads to more and tougher competition among them. Just a higher interest in chess by men will increase the pool of talent. It may be that having a women's league is necessary both due to low numbers of women chess players at a competitive level, and a lower level of competence in that pool of players. Technically we could desegregate all sports, but that would lead to men replacing women at all levels. It's a similar situation in some ways…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 07:08 AM
3

To your ego perhaps. There isn't an unkind word that hasn't already been said about men's issues.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:15 PM
5

I know what Github is. Doesn't change the fact they charge 10k to service schools. It's part of the larger grievance industry running on campuses that includes all the new Title IX investigators and sexual assault awareness seminars etc There is no way this program would exist and be able to charge money in an environment that wasn't in the grips of a rape hysteria.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:14 PM
6

Wrong. HB 51 is a creation of and supported by Reps
/r/MensRights01/04/17 12:11 PM
1

I don't think that's prosecuted in all of the united states actually. I think in Mormon(?) areas mostly.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:13 AM
15

For a fee, schools can implement Callisto, which enables students to create a free account. ...Callisto, which launched in 2015, is being used by seven colleges, which each pay a setup fee of $5,000 to $10,000 plus an annual subscription. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:07 AM
84

I'll remain highly skeptical of anything regarding this topic. The incentives for pandering and remaining on course are too great at the moment.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:02 AM
25

Yes, a public statement by a sitting President that may be good news for an overlooked civil rights movement is something to be maligned.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:00 AM
6

You chose a poor example for reasonable feminism. Analytic feminism is, at its core, still feminism: a pseudo-scientific ideology based on patriarchy theory and further on Marxist identity politics. Analytic feminists are philosophers who believe that both philosophy and feminism are well served by using some of the concepts, theories, and methods of analytic philosophy modified by feminist values and insights. This is one of many examples of feminism trying to creep its way into other disciplin…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 10:33 PM
6

No I don't believe so, nor did OP say that was what should be done. They stated that's what often happens, which is true and overlooked. It's part of the reason services for female offenders do not exist. They are not recognized as contributing to the situation.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:34 PM
2

I don't know the child deductions in the UK, so I can't speak to that, nor would I expect that to account for the whole difference, nor did I state it did. It was an example of differing tax burdens/returns.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:34 PM
6

Big enough would mean bigger than the law enforcement system that locks up bleeding men or bigger than the family court system that enables false accusations.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:22 PM
8

Has no one aggressively been in your personal space or said the most vile things about you/people you love? What a naive thing to say. You're moral enlightenment doesn't change the reality of OP's comment.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:20 PM
4

According to The Australian, the new project will cost taxpayers $3.4million AUS ($2.6million US). Awful.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:18 PM
5

No, it doesn't reduce the amount paid. I was pointing out women get more from the government for each dollar paid relative to men. Although generally only custodial parents can claim children on their taxes, which is close to 80% women. Granted that's a result of poor policy rather than a goal of poor policy, I would say. I would also like to know what forms of alimony, retirement garnishing, disability garnishing, child support, etc are taxed and which aren't as women are also the majority of c…
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:12 PM
1

Wow, that's quite good. I do wonder though, if Gov. Deal was opposed to the last bill, what's keeping him from vetoing this one? Side note, 5 Calls is definitely a left-leaning advocacy site. I can't access the numbers of representatives without clicking on one of their preset initiatives and SB 71 is not one of those. The Senate Members List and your list of senators are a more comprehensive reference.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 04:51 PM
9

Tax breaks I'm not sure as I'm in the US, but women-only initiatives and programs, yes.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 04:48 PM
2

WIGTOW is the only way!
/r/MensRights28/03/17 04:53 PM
5

At least they summarized what MGTOW is pretty well.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:12 PM
9

http://archive.is/Qnghy archive of the site in question, including the schedule and confession event.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 08:24 PM
2

I don't know 100% either way, nor may it be measurable. But is it generally men or women that are genocided during conflicts? Is it generally gays or lesbians that are murdered for their sexual orientation? What is the balance between having less responsibility or having more obligation? Can men be punished for the transgressions of women "under their care"?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 08:17 PM
1

The men's rights movement in general needs a total tone overhaul if it's going to be taken seriously. Get bent. If you think that's what's keeping it from being mainstream you're terribly misinformed.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 08:11 PM
2

This is the third attempt in Florida, last one Gov. Scott vetoed.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:18 PM
1

Because men are less likely to hit women, so the percent of non-reciprocal violence is lower.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 04:09 PM
2

Good news! Thanks for the information.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 04:40 AM
2

I've come to understand why people are against public schooling/for "school choice" in the past year or so. What the fuck?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 04:37 AM
9

In the US? It depends. Technically, the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting standard is gender neutral (although possibly for the benefit of gay men rather than men in general). State by state, the statutes are different, but most have gender neutral state law on the matter. Georgia/Idaho do not.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 04:31 AM
1

Because very little of the MRM has anything to do with promoting the left-leaning policies, and in many ways those policies stand in opposition to MRM goals. That being said, not supporting, say, the Democratic/Labour platform doesn't necessarily mean someone is conservative or right-leaning. I suppose it's like saying an anti-feminist isn't necessarily an MRA.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 02:12 AM
1

It's a political agenda because they're advertising it as water for women rather than clean water for underdeveloped regions. Is it true or false that promoting something as helping or harming women is politically expedient?
/r/MensRights19/03/17 06:56 PM
1

I'm not aware of this specifically, but there are "rape shield laws" that limits the evidence that can be brought in such cases.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 06:34 PM
14

Cultural relativism is a sickness.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 09:30 PM
1

Specifically in other people is debatable as the extent of crossover and collateral damage from halting bans is hard to measure. However jewish groups definitely have lobbied to keep mgm legal, at least in the interest of their own "religious freedom." Good news is there are some jewish groups pushing for the end of mgm in their religion and many who are culturally jewish and don't cut.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 09:28 PM
3

It's not THE JEWS, but it is indeed jewish groups that campaign on behalf of MGM. A referendum was halted in California by a Jewish group alongside the ACLU, and the german high courts specifically created religious exceptions (jewish) in their ruling that mgm was illegal. In addition, there was a post here within the last week iirc that mohels who suck the penis of cut babies wouldn't be banned, just the ones that have herpes due to jewish pressure.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 09:22 PM
10

Donating to clean water initiatives is a better use of money than buying a pack of Stella. It's not an important campaign, it's political opportunism masquerading as empathy.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 09:17 PM
0

It seems you don't read much to begin with anyways.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 09:14 PM
3

Come on.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:58 AM
1

Holy editorialized title Batman!
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:58 AM
1

RUSSIA
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:57 AM
1

Are there any other articles on the topic? I'm getting the "read more" page
/r/MensRights18/03/17 02:38 AM
1

Yes it is. Have you not payed attention to which political groups promote feminism (Democrats, Labor, "Socialist Utopia Sweden", etc) or its origins in Marxist politics? That Women's Day was literally a Communist invention? That anarchists, anti-capitalists, and anti-western thought is celebrated in feminist circles? As for money, they don't keep all the money to themselves. That's why they have the tacit support of so many women instead of those same women turning on corrupt family courts. The …
/r/MensRights17/03/17 02:29 PM
4

That's a whole lot of over simplification mixed with some wrong Like what?
/r/MensRights16/03/17 11:41 PM
1

Thanks for the update on the status. I've been checking the HB51 page for updates. Do you happen to know when the vote will be held? Are the columns mislabeled? I see phone numbers under support level and emails under district phone. Nvm the floating columns are the proper labels.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 11:29 PM
16

race-baiting Say what now?
/r/MensRights16/03/17 11:22 PM
8

Reminds me of cases referenced in The Fraud of Feminism. (vitriol-throwing, or vitriolage, is synonymous with acid attack) Let us now take the crime of violent assault with attempt to do bodily injury. The following cases will serve as illustrative examples:—From The News of the World, 9th May 1909: A nurse in Belfast sued her lost swain for breach of promise. She obtained £100 damages although it was admitted by her counsel that she had thrown vitriol over the defendant, thereby injuring him, a…
/r/MensRights16/03/17 11:20 PM
-3

I don't know about this post supporting that claim, but feminism is definitely on the authoritarian left side of things just as communism is. Gender quotas, massive redistribution of wealth, oppressed/oppressor dichotomy, etc
/r/MensRights16/03/17 08:46 PM
4

Just a heads up for anyone that uses amazon smile. Check the list of eligible charities for groups that help men and boys. In this case, Florida Dream Center is opening a center to benefit boys who are victims of sex trafficking.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 06:22 PM
3

The term "underrepresented" assumes that there must be parity in the first place.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 06:16 PM
3

That is interesting on names. For example, stereotypical African American names arent (Laqueesha) seen as professional as other names, kind of like Cletus or Bubba. I wonder why they didn't use Jane and John. Pretty standard.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 01:49 PM
3

Pretty sure she's the one who says we'd be living in grass huts without men.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 01:36 PM
1

"Toxic masculinity is one of the ways in which Patriarchy is harmful to men. It refers to the socially-constructed attitudes that describe the masculine gender role as violent, unemotional, sexually aggressive, and so forth." The definition says "socially-constructed" which is a perfect example of the obsession with culture as the determining factor in behavior. Violence, stoicism, and sexual aggression are positive adaptive behaviors given not just our society, but human biology. To state that …
/r/MensRights15/03/17 01:08 AM
3

Someone posted a panel discussion on the topic here recently. I would recommend viewing it as it has people on the panel who are very sympathetic, if not outright supporters, of men's issues. There's just enough pro toxic masculinity topics to keep it interesting.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 01:04 AM
1

My point is that "we, as men," get to think for ourselves as individuals and don't need a representative to instruct us how to behave. And discriminating against men isn't ending gender discrimination. It's not the job of the government to enforce quotas in public (or private) sector jobs. No matter if it's teaching, fire fighting, or paper pushing. Interest and ability are suitable measures for employment, not demographics. There's no such thing as equally capable candidates by the fact that pe…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 12:59 AM
13

But where will women meet their future college-educated husbands???
/r/MensRights15/03/17 12:41 AM
5

Reading the AMA's of men on reddit, and testimonials in general, will often include the topic of being "invisible" in daily life. I would say most men do not get smiles, hellos, comments, or praise, when in public. It's like how older women tell younger women they'll miss being flirted with.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:08 PM
2

We, as men, should not get pissed, because a reform is favorable to women in certain work fields, and to be honest in this case, rightfully so. What a gentlemen. I'm glad you're here to let us men know how we should act.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:51 AM
3

actually had one thought the army should make 75lb rounds weigh less than 75lbs. LOL the lack of understanding in that idea is incredible
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:45 AM
3

Interesting case, thank you for the link.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:42 AM
3

Diversity is code for less men, less whites, or both depending on the circumstance (PC folk even do it to themselves, see "intersectionalism"). In their world view, any place where men or whites are disproportionately represented (in this case firefighting) it must be a result of discrimination. Therefore, pushing more "minorities" like women into such places is righting a wrong and must inevitably be tackled by government mandate.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:40 AM
5

Do you not think your conclusion of feminist wanting cushy air conditioned jobs,l and wanting their name in lights seem a little drastic? Not OP, but I wouldn't say it's drastic. If you look across the western world, you'll notice that government programs and mandated quotas are for women in business/politics/STEM, not in ditch digging/boiler making/sewage work.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:28 AM
4

Honestly? They value equality of outcome, not opportunity. It's "benevolent authoritarianism" in which it is the job of the government to enforce their vision of an egalitarian utopia.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:22 AM
6

...have they spoken to a lawyer? This is very strange behavior on their part and reckless to have children sleeping with strangers like that. Make sure to keep records of communication corroborating your claims, especially so the police/lawyer can review them.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:48 PM
5

It's like a real life version of the feminist bookstore from Portlandia.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:46 PM
5

I believe the ACLU is sponsoring "resistance workshops" for those who oppose Trump. I don't expect their politics to align on this issue in a productive way. You would be better served giving your attention to FIRE.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:44 PM
3

NOW has campaigned against shared parenting and alimony reform for decades. They did it last year in Florida alongside the League of Women Voters.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:56 AM
7

Wow they are really active lately eh? I'll have to see if they'll be in my area at some point.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:53 AM
3

Lol this is unexpected
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:51 AM
12

Boko Haram kidnapped girls? = #bring back our girls Biko Haram burns boys? = Silence
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:46 AM
1

Don't forget the difference​ between the suffragettes and suffragists.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:41 AM
3

Women could vote earlier and in varying capacities (widow, state, national) in places like the Western territories, in some cases decades earlier.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 01:40 AM
1

I didn't make a claim on numbers. There are comparable forms of MGM/FGM. That's not disputable. And the ethical issues are identical. It's a question of bodily autonomy. Invasiveness is a medical question, not ethical. A single intrusion upon the person is a violation. The question it all boils down to is "Does a parent have the right to perform cosmetic surgery upon an infant that reduces or removes healthy body tissue?" MGM also has its roots in controlling male sexuality. It was originally pr…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 07:38 PM
1

It offends you. It's not inherently offensive. The juxtaposition implies that feminist concerns are hypocritical or somehow invalid because of men's problems. No, you're over generalizing. It's hypocritical to advocate for "my body, my choice" but not "his body, his choice." This isn't about men's issues broadly, just the specific scenario in which a person doesn't afford an infant rights to its own body. In addition, feminism doesn't own women, nor does it own reproductive rights for women. Acc…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 07:27 PM
1

I understand that and wish they would take a closer look at the history of feminism. It isn't just a history of egalitarian acts and it's most lauded and politically powerful advocates (ex Susan Brownmiller, Andrea Dworkin) aren't upholding the idea that it's an equality movement.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 07:23 PM
1

Then why make a point of mentioning feminists if they do nothing in support? If they are "literally the ones" arguing against MGM then I would expect at least a press release lauding the Bloodstained Men. No such small effort exists.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 07:19 PM
1

Yes, these things are true. If we are to be fair historically, this was not as an unpopular way of thinking as it is today (racism). However, what strikes me the most about this fact is that it stands in stark contrast to the myth that suffragettes were heroic egalitarians.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 07:16 PM
6

Woman. That's a woman.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:46 PM
4

If you would like a copy of this report, kindly make a financial contribution to our cause on this site. I appreciate the sentiment, but what's the deal here? How does someone expect to get more people on board if they have to pay to see what positions are being promoted?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:44 PM
2

I am increasingly happy to live in the United States, despite its flaws.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:41 PM
4

Not sure if you're /s but there are many forms of FGM, with some less invasive than MGM and other that are comparable. The ethical issues are also identical.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:20 AM
8

why this sub considers its self the antithesis to women's rights It doesn't. You've missed the point of the comic. It highlights the irony in not wanting someone to make a choice for the woman's body but accept a choice on behalf of the infant's body. promote this almost anti feminist culture when in reality the two groups have mutual goals Not almost anti-feminist. Explicitly anit-feminist. There's no cooperating with a movement that deliberately harm's men and boy's rights. For example, NOW an…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:17 AM
1

Depends on location and demographic, but generally at least half.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:11 AM
7

Elizabeth Candy Stanton, one of the OG feminist suffragettes, gave an entire speech about how men were violent, brutish, cruel, and uncivilized and needed women's civilizing influence. Man hating is one of the few consistencies of feminism.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:10 AM
33

Very true. This is the same problem with FGM in cultures where it is practiced. Village matriarchs are often the ones who perform the procedure and almost all the justifications for MGM you will hear for FGM. It's one of the reasons tackling this issue is so hard because people take it very personally.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:07 AM
15

Then why is it groups like Bloodstained Men that actually appear to protest and not the National Organization for Women or the League of Women Voters?
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:06 AM
2

The US is developed and does this in large numbers. Developed countries like Germany and the UK don't prosecute people who do it to children and carve out religious exceptions.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:04 AM
8

Have you seen a doctor? There are creams, stretching exercises, and partial circumcisions that can help with that.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:01 AM
1

Boys who are circumcised are subject to the same conditions. There aren't boys-only genital cutting wards in the middle east/africa.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 11:59 PM
3

Yes, it's legal. Google death by herpes and circumcision.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 11:57 PM
1

Mike Buchanan runs Justice for Men and Boys. Drop him a line and see if he can connect you to local groups or keep abreast of opportunities in the UK to participate. https://j4mb.org.uk/about-mike-buchanan/
/r/MensRights11/03/17 11:01 PM
1

My mind is well and truly boggled by this situation. If you're managers don't set this right, you'll have weigh your options (media, lawyer, new job). Did you get a response from NCFM?
/r/MensRights10/03/17 07:06 PM
1

Ah. I don't think you'll find much disagreement then. What people, particularly here, have issue with is the concept of there either being no biological basis in gender (blank slate/women and men are identical) or the abuse of trans issues to promote authoritarian policies (hate speech codes, trans as a state of mind).
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:56 PM
0

The reason I ask is that it changes the nature of the punishment. If he did not enjoy the attention, then the admins are 1) lying and 2) discriminating based on his sex 3) enters some very dicey moral territory on the issue of men's immoral sexuality. If he did enjoy the attention, then 1) they were not lying 2) both students were punished for participating in a sexual act on school grounds and 3) it an issue of sexual propriety generally rather than of a particular sex. The female student was p…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:53 PM
1

Why do you ask? Is there a particular reason? Your question is kind of vague.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 04:48 PM
10

"It's okay! I'm discriminating, but only by a little!"
/r/MensRights10/03/17 04:44 PM
1

So did he actually like it or was that their justification for punishing him? That's a pretty important distinction.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 04:41 PM
8

It would be a horror show, if only for the fact that so many competent leaders would leave the country to the wolves.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 04:33 PM
19

Yes, statistically, infant boys are more likely to be killed in the first year of life. However, to say its always sons is an exaggeration.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 04:30 PM
4

Look up the phrase "feminist edit-a-thon"
/r/MensRights10/03/17 04:24 PM
7

Elizabeth Candy Stanton: "I urge a sixteenth amendment, because 'manhood suffrage,' or a man's government, is civil, religious, and social disorganization. The male element is a destructive force, stern, selfish, aggrandizing, loving war, violence, conquest, acquisition, breeding in the material and moral world alike discord, disorder, disease, and death. See what a record of blood and cruelty the pages of history reveal! Through what slavery, slaughter, and sacrifice, through what inquisitions …
/r/MensRights10/03/17 04:23 PM
1

Did a second or third feminism pop up from the primordial ooze separate from the influence of its predecessors?
/r/MensRights10/03/17 04:19 PM
5

I'm sure there's both, but lazy/unmotivated people existed many years ago when the gap wasn't so great. Part of the issue is we're seeing the results of policies implemented years ago that discourages boys in grade school, not just the obvious anti-male discrimination we see today such as Title IX abuse.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 11:14 PM
2

The number of men willing to do dirty work is growing because they are going to college less I would think. I don't know what you're getting at.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 11:12 PM
2

If it's the ranking I'm thinking of, it's all BS. They don't count women doing better than men as inequality, so the whole premise is false to begin with.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 11:08 PM
1

Thanks for the info, glad to have helped out.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 12:43 AM
2

Hm, not that I'm worried about misuse, but I do wonder then what will happen to the funds gathered for that purpose.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 09:07 PM
1

Cowardice.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 12:57 PM
18

Dude, these kind of people hold literal editathons where they sit in a room and change wiki pages to suit their politics
/r/MensRights08/03/17 12:50 PM
8

No, just one day is not going to do that much harm. Societies have survived a day without electricity or running water before. In Iceland certain second sector fields were so female-dominated that they had to cease too, still no major harm, only huge inconvenience. Many industries had to shut down, they did experience financial harm too. Even though nursing was female-dominated, still nobody died that day for this reason either. They survived because there were other areas that did have electric…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 11:20 PM
4

Yeah, where were the Amazonian Natives and Cayman Islanders???
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:56 PM
5

Thanks for the link. If anyone was ever were under any illusion that the Women's March/Women's Strike were anything but a Trojan horse for far left political ideas then I suggest your read their About page. Also note that there are reprints in Spanish and Arabic on the site, fitting in well with declared open borders/"immigrants rights" positions (comments and emphasis added): International Women’s Strike US Platform The International Women’s Strike on March 8th, 2017 is an international day of …
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:41 PM
10

As a woman (not a feminist), I actually support this event, though. This isn't some new radical idea - Iceland has done this one. Everybody survived. That's the point that a lot of people are making though. Society would suffer severe damage if men did the same, even for just a day. Just picking one occupation from the following (policemen, EMTs, judges, sewage workers, IT professionals) would cause great physical harm, but also great financial harm. In addition, women do generally work "cozy fr…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 06:40 PM
3

"The personal is political."
/r/MensRights07/03/17 06:26 PM
1

Question 30: (Optional) Please provide any additional information that you felt was excluded from the Chairwoman’s Survey. Include topics relating to men's issues you would like addressed as your answer to the final question, such as forming a White House Council on Men and Boys (http://whitehouseboysmen.org/)
/r/MensRights07/03/17 06:23 PM
1

Question 30: (Optional) Please provide any additional information that you felt was excluded from the Chairwoman’s Survey. Include topics relating to men's issues you would like addressed as your answer to the final question, such as forming a White House Council on Men and Boys (http://whitehouseboysmen.org/)
/r/MensRights07/03/17 06:20 PM
3

Yeah not what I wanted to hear either. A message was left with Senator Tillery as well as a request for an email response, so I'll update again if they respond.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:26 PM
1

pro tem judges Interesting, I haven't heard of this term before.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:20 PM
6

What are the actual percentages though? So far as I'm aware the number of Muslims living in Western nations is relatively small. Is there reason to believe there is going to be a huge uptick in the numbers? That's the thing though, numbers is only part of the situation. There's about 0.9% Muslims, or around 3 million people in the US. However, we still have the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR, Ellison, "Clock Boy", useful idiots etc pushing the boundaries of our legal system and society. The power of n…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 04:16 PM
3

Holy shit, if it's not the misandrist laws and judges, it's the corrupt greedy ones. Are there other examples of this other than this article?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 03:22 PM
6

And the false claims — both on campus and off — are much more prevalent than the media would have you believe. A 2012 Urban Institute report found that of 227 men convicted of rape, 15 percent of them could be eliminated by DNA evidence alone. A study of 351 cases in a Southeastern police department found that 17 percent of the allegations were fabricated and another 66 percent were uncertain. I would very much like to see these sources.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 03:18 PM
6

We are living in interesting times because it doesn't appear plausible that the nuclear armed west can be conquered by a patriarchy, unless the most alarmist predictions about Islam are true. The work of the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR, as well as that of guilty leftists shouting Islamophobia, demonstrates a real danger of Islamists upending Western democracy. Swedish officials wear Hijabs to government meetings, Canada passes anti-Islamophobia bills, Trudeau applauds a sex-segregated congregati…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 03:11 PM
1

Jewish Circumcision Resource Center Like the American cultural practice of circumcision, Jewish circumcision (bris or brit milah) is dependent on the acceptance of cultural myths. Of all the myths that Jews believe about circumcision, the one that is paramount is the belief that all Jews circumcise. With this belief, we put ourselves under tremendous pressure to conform.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:44 PM
4

http://www.wnd.com/2017/01/womens-march-speakera-kidnapper-murderer/ The organizers of the Women's March allowed a convicted kidnapper, torturer, and murderer to speak at their march. Same march was also organized by a proponent of Sharia law.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:41 PM
1

I gotchu fam: book text online
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:24 PM
1

Try contacting the National Coalition for Men as well. They are currently pursuing a case against the government to desegregate or abolish the Selective Service. They may be able to provide further advice or support. They have both email and phone contact information listed.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:21 PM
1

Say what now?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:15 PM
2

For instance, I haven't had to register for the draft for a few decades, yet I am still voting. You only have to register once at 18 to receive the legal benefits, and they don't ask people over (or at?) 26 to register. The only thing you're supposed to do is update them when you change address, which isn't really enforced as far as I know. But if you provide a change of address to the government as needed to keep proper records/billing address/etc, you should be easy to find anyhow.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:13 PM
3

Bax was also involved with "The Legal Subjugation of Men"
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:09 PM
5

Find the movie on the following platforms: Amazon iTunes Vudu Netflix DVD I assume more are to be announced once the movie is released, as well as if the movie becomes in greater demand.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:06 PM
8

Yes, I'm interested to see what happens with that one.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:01 PM
3

You could purchase one of her other films or make extra effort to promote the film on social media.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:00 PM
9

Can confirm, OP is a figgit and also hitler.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:59 PM
16

For now at least. Once it has broader availability, look for that number to change.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:59 PM
67

And yet they have no problem having a woman that tortured and murder a gay man and a convicted terrorist as speakers at their events. She did torture the guy, but the victim was not confirmed to be gay. The statements about him being gay come from an accomplice who joked about forcefully sodomizing the victim, not the speaker in question.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:57 PM
4

Hopefully the demand will be great enough on other platforms to get Netflix to make it available online as well.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:55 PM
3

I left a message for Senator Harbison and McKoon, speaking breifly with the former's aid. McKoon's aid said she was just keeping a tally.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:50 PM
2

Abrasive language, but not a false statement. If someone can be cowed with shaming language then they aren't a resilient person.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:28 PM
3

This would allow them to pursue their dreams of living abroad, raising a family, and doing so comfortably. They needed each other for this though. One to make the money, the other to manage the household. Why does a joint decision made for the benefit of both require compensation from one to another? Why doesn't your mom have to give something to compensate the hours of work your dad did instead? Your dad, I assume, didn't get to hang out with his family at work. What about his time lost being w…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:25 PM
0

In this case, the stay at home person, should be awarded money for years a numbers of years until the person can have the same education and work opportunities as the working person. Where does that end? A Master's degree? A Doctorate? Decades of work experience in a particular field? How about an NFL contract? Do you really expect one person to finance years and years of another person's life with no guarantee they will even make proper use of that time? A year to find a job and a place to live…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:18 PM
3

It will often be followed by wall of text :p
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:21 PM
1

Keep us posted on what happens. I think many people are interested to see where this goes.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:20 PM
2

pinheads lol one of my favorite insults
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:40 PM
1

Unlikely, but let's hope the woman makes a change in her life and stops getting plastered, at least not alone.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:39 PM
2

The authors of this article co-wrote "The Campus Rape Frenzy: The Campus Rape Frenzy: The Attack on Due Process at America's Universities". Check it out.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:25 PM
3

There's the case of "Rose" if I remember correctly. Only regret sex accusation from a man that was investigated I believe.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:23 PM
3

Nah, live you life as you wish. Best change to make would be don't get wasted or engage with women who drank alcohol. Widespread alcohol abuse is a big part of how these issues manifest.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:22 PM
-1

None of which are absolute or permanent, to be fair. "Un-life" is permanent and absolute.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:18 PM
1

It lead to where we are now, which is to say a growing awareness of men's issues and feminist lies as well as the establishment of official men's groups. And in combination with growing hysterics, lies, and violence by leftist/feminist groups, I think the tide will continue to turn as opponents sabotage their own arguments. I'm quite happy to be the reasonable, peaceful foil to those kind of erratic, braindead mobs.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:14 PM
1

Yes, people, but I referred to men as the context is men striking to prove how they do the majority of vital work.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:08 PM
2

My rep is a democrat, and while the vote was ultimately a Nay, the conversation was good. They didn't seem particularly vehement in their position. In addition, I was able to to provide counter arguments to the stock lines they heard from the opposition (abuser in classes with victims, etc). Gives me reason to think there's room for change in at least one case.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:07 PM
3

Thanks for the update. I'll have to make some phone calls tomorrow!
/r/MensRights05/03/17 05:03 PM
8

"alter", "remove" or even "endanger" would be way better choice of word. You're talking about a group called "Bloodstained Men". They don't tip toe around the issue. They are protesting genital cutting of babies, but they should soften their language? That's a bit odd.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 10:32 PM
3

pyrrhic victory Perfect term for the situation.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 10:28 PM
7

No, it's not self-defeating, it's a realistic appraisal of the situation. There are smarter ways to do things than leave your job (that pays the bills) to march. You can reach more people standing next to a highway on the weekend for less effort and money and you don't have to jeopardize your income. (a couple hundred cars in a few hours easy) And if you think passion is what's lacking between feminist lobbying and mra lobbying, then you're not paying attention to what's been going on. There are…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 10:26 PM
14

I don't have any suggestions. I was pointing out that even if they wanted to march, the consequences would be to great for a lot of guys to do so. The lack of policeman or energy workers would be devastating, perhaps enough so to overshadow the purpose of the march in the first place.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 05:29 PM
3

If you can't argue the points because it all boils down to Patriarchy, then you need to understand what that word means to begin with. Calling the patriarchy men is a misunderstanding. The Patriarchy refers to Western, capitalist democracy rather than the male sex itself, which is to say The Patriarchy is the power structure that has been created to support our modern society. What feminists argue against isn't just men, but our systems of governance and commerce that allow our society to functi…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 05:19 PM
10

They have a habit of shooting themselves in the foot. They're too dedicated to their bullshit to learn any better. I look forward to every one of these marches now because it shows normal people how absurd the feminists/far left are.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 05:05 PM
47

Guys who have vital jobs generally don't think its okay to put others in actual danger to make a political statement.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 05:02 PM
14

It removes a normal part of the penis making function abnormal. The moving foreskin is non-existent.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 12:55 PM
1

I really have no idea how I became interested in men's issues. I probably saw some youtube video and followed a link here. Once I found this sub I did a ton of reading on the issues and now I am just trying to keep up to date on what's going on. I've been pretty fortunate to have avoided serious things like domestic violence or family courts.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 04:26 AM
1

Yes, I saw this. Disappointing. I'll definitely keep it in mind next election.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 04:07 AM
1

It means Georgia is one step closer to passing legislation limiting the ability of college admins to expel or otherwise punish (male) students via college tribunals that ignore due process protections. Full Bill Details
/r/MensRights04/03/17 04:06 AM
1

The bill passed in the House. So next is the Senate?
/r/MensRights03/03/17 02:53 PM
4

GA HB51: Full Text and Info
/r/MensRights03/03/17 02:51 PM
2

Good luck! I hope to see footage of the talk after it has ended.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:02 AM
1

Infamous even lol who knows this place exists in the first place?
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:00 AM
2

As well as a Maoist, no?
/r/MensRights01/03/17 05:59 AM
1

But why?
/r/MensRights28/02/17 02:16 PM
5

Did he murder her in her sleep?
/r/MensRights28/02/17 02:16 PM
2

Amazing! There should be a new sticky to update people.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 01:15 AM
1

flick him My dad used to do that to my younger brother. He can't fucking stand it if someone does that to him. It's not a small thing to have that done to you over and over.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 07:02 PM
3

You may be able to learn more from an ICMI 16 presentation by Tim Hammond which includes information from the Global Survey of Circumcision Harm.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 06:58 PM
1

Identical twins are not the basis for lawmaking for the general public. Twins share many biological markers that we still use to accurately determine a person's identity. Just because twins can confound these methods doesn't invalidate the methods. Even so, the scenario doesn't stand to reason. An identical twin will not behave the same way or know the same things as the other. If someone can't tell the difference in behavior or knowledge through interaction, then that's another layer of unlikel…
/r/MensRights27/02/17 06:47 PM
1

What country are you in?
/r/MensRights27/02/17 12:43 PM
3

C'mon your just kicking the beehive.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 12:32 PM
6

They did at Amherst.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 12:30 PM
6

Part of the issue is access to legal counsel. A lot of the guys who are declared fathers or get jailed for CS non-payments are too broke to pay or in jail/just out of jail (often for CS non-payment in the first place). Many don't know they can appeal such rulings in the first place and there's no "father's advocates" groups like there are for women in situations of alleged domestic violence, for example. And with CS in particular, there is a much lower incentive to annul or reduce payments becau…
/r/MensRights26/02/17 09:47 PM
12

Feminism is a trojan horse for other political movements. If they were sincere on vagina issues, they wouldn't have allowed Sarsour be involved with the first march after advocating sharia law for example. As long as someone speaks the proper anti-western/capitalist language, they have free reign to participate. Luckily, the "fellow kids", or rather "fellow feminists", approach can only go so far before the general populace take notice as is already happening.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 03:22 PM
2

It just goes to show how detached they are from normal people and how subservient they are to the influence of particular political movements rather than the aims of equal rights.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 03:15 PM
6

LOL
/r/MensRights26/02/17 03:14 PM
36

Something to look out for guys, a bit of good news: Runestad says those DNA tests should make a difference. He heard the story of Carnell Alexander on WXYZ, and decided to take action. He says this year he hopes to pass legislation that would protect men from being forced to pay for another man’s children. Plus women and process servers who lie should face legal consequences. ... Runestad has written five bills that he says will protect both men and children from such fraud. He says he plans to …
/r/MensRights26/02/17 03:09 PM
8

Well I would say chivalrous traditionalists would be a better group to specify than conservatives broadly, but I understand you're point.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 02:14 PM
2

To be fair, being anti-feminist isn't necessarily pro-mra. Even if they ignore men's issues but reduce the influence of feminism in government it will be a gain overall. They don't have to endorse or cooperate with mra's in any capacity.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 02:13 PM
8

Goodness gracious the quotes in this article are surreal. Gender diversity expert Professor Robert Wood introduced the latest politically correct inanity, “unconscious bias”, and criticised the predominance of “Anglo-Saxon males” and the “banter culture” of the Army. And they're coming after the bantz too. What a complete and utter lack of understanding for how men make friends and shoot the shit together.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 04:44 AM
5

Related: In sweden at least, they are much, much more likely to avoid jail for such murders. source We report that 24% of the female offenders had child victims, whereas the same is true for only 5% of the male offenders. Those rates correspond well with fi ndings from a study by Flynn and co-workers (2011; 23% and 4%, respectively). They also reported that 63% of the female fi licide offenders in their study had received hospital-order or non-custodial sentences, whereas such sanctions only wer…
/r/MensRights26/02/17 04:35 AM
3

You mean one involved in government? It must be admitted those are few and far between.
/r/MensRights26/02/17 04:31 AM
2

haha well Erhardt put a stop to that didn't he? Glad to see someone who keeps order regarding these controversial issues. Are the materials submitted to the legislature available on the Families Advocating for Campus Equality website or some other location?
/r/MensRights25/02/17 09:41 PM
1

I have some family who just bought tickets. I look forward to hearing about their experience.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 09:25 PM
3

I'm poking fun at the phrase "real men" is all.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 07:10 PM
8

Quick update: I was able to speak with Rep. Buckner. I can't say that she is either for or against the bill, but she's definitely aware of the situation on campuses and of how false accusations can harm someone from personal experience. She said she'll keep what I had to say in mind given that the situation may change by the time she's able to get a hold of it on friday.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 06:56 PM
3

Well, keep an archive of all your correspondence and don't talk to police without a lawyer if it comes to that. Otherwise I wouldn't get involved any more. Keeping distance is probably a good idea. And seriously, be careful with the booze. It's a whole lot more trouble than its worth, especially in these kinds of situations. See a counselor that isn't affiliated with the school if you're still having problems later down the line. Part of the danger in false accusations are the mental effects on …
/r/MensRights25/02/17 06:34 PM
3

For women as mothers, however, the UBI opens up the possibility of a hitherto unseen equality that includes freedom from dependence on a male wage. And who pays all the taxes that would fund UBI? The moms at home getting the benefits?
/r/MensRights25/02/17 06:23 PM
4

You should write a post about this stuff, if for no other reason to have a public record of it.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 06:23 PM
13

The radicals are the ones in charge.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 06:15 PM
-1

This is the same kind of argument as the "husbands are more dangerous than terrorists" article a week or two back...
/r/MensRights25/02/17 06:14 PM
3

"Real Men"
/r/MensRights25/02/17 06:13 PM
9

Two things. Yes, women will likely be shuffled into easier/less dangerous jobs in the event of a draft. And if the situation is so dire as to require a draft, this is the best solution. Equality does not jive on the battlefield. Only effectiveness. If more able men can be mustered by pulling them off driving trucks, then so be it if it means the survival of a society or way of life. Second, probably has exceptions is not the same as does have exceptions. If you have a source for these failings, …
/r/MensRights25/02/17 01:00 AM
6

lol well I can't actually tell who this is marketed toward, a man or a woman. I think it's funny it exists, but wouldn't be chuffed to be given it as a gift.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 12:56 AM
4

Great work thank you! Will I be able to make calls to them on the weekend, or will that have to happen early Monday? (c) This Code section shall not supersede federal statutes or properly promulgated federal regulations to the contrary but shall apply in the case of federal guidance letters and other expressions of opinion regarding policies by federal agencies. I find this rather funny in that the OCR's defense has been that their letter was "just guidance" and now, as such, this bill can overr…
/r/MensRights25/02/17 12:49 AM
1

Because the saying is that "A broken clock is right twice a day." I don't think it's fair to discount a statement outright based on the source, particularly if there are legitimate arguments to be made in opposition. Smearing or exposing wrong doing doesn't attack the individual argument, just the source of that argument. It doesn't answer whether an individual position is right or wrong. For example, I think the SPLC is an overtly politicized group as it has labeled non-hate groups as such in o…
/r/MensRights25/02/17 12:42 AM
3

Thanks, I mean the article. It's terribly biased.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:30 PM
1

Huh I thought this was a dv ad.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 10:23 PM
6

Who wrote this garbage?
/r/MensRights24/02/17 09:42 PM
6

Thank you for the information, but I don't find this to be a compelling reason to discount their position on this issue if that's what you mean to do.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 04:51 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights24/02/17 02:14 PM
1

Ah, she doesn't often as far as I know.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 02:13 PM
1

This should be recorded automatically to the government website. Just have to track it down.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 01:52 PM
2

And what would they gain? The lawyer's costs would probably be more than any civil penalty.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 02:35 AM
1

If a person pretended to be the husband of a woman to have sex with her, I'm sure you'd agree that is an obvious rape, but perhaps not warranting the same punishment as a violent rape. If I pretended to be a Muslim and had sex with a devout Muslim woman, that would perhaps be rape too but it's less obvious. I wouldn't agree that's an obvious rape. I think there's been too much blurring of what rape is and what counts as a "rape-rape". At what point will we hold someone accountable for what is a …
/r/MensRights23/02/17 11:38 PM
1

She also uses the pseudonym Janet Bloomfield
/r/MensRights23/02/17 11:33 PM
1

A lack of corroborating evidence, refusal of victims to cooperate, and government misconduct are ways that a conviction would not be made. That's why people are proclaimed "not guilty" rather than "innocent". Sometimes a person cannot factually be known to be innocent, just that the evidence is not great enough to say, within a certain standard of doubt, that they are guilty.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 11:32 PM
2

I agree that women behaving badly posts aren't useful until a sentence is passed. However, it must be noted that there are more women behaving badly than men's issues bills being submitted. However, political action does get attention when it occurs, such as the recent challenges by MP Davies and GA HB51. I only wish the engagement was as good by the broader reddit audience as many of the "popular" posts here. As an aside, pussypass doesn't exist anymore actually. It's been co-opted by one or mo…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:20 PM
1

I think it's worth separating "liberal" from "regressive/progressive" and "conservative" from "traditionalist". A person can be liberal without subscribing to identity politics and a person can be conservative without buying into chivalric/religious dogma. So your comparison of feminist/conservative would be better suited as feminist/traditionalist as conservative is too broad a label and the use of men as tools of service is common between them.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:14 PM
1

The first example of someone with some name recognition would be Judgy Bitch, but she toes the line between provocation and fact in a way that makes it hard to condemn or support her position.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:07 PM
3

It matters why someone is saying women shouldn't have the right to vote. If it's because "women are dumb/overemotional" then it's not a good argument because it can be discredited. If it's because women don't have equal obligation to the state (Selective Service restrictions), then it is a good argument based in fact that can be remedied (abolish or desegregate the Selective Service). As a separate line of discussion, it's also worth examining the voting trends of men and women over their lifeti…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:01 PM
3

Much of anti-muslim sentiment isn't actually against muslims necessarily, but a reaction to the hypocrisy of calling the West (white/secular) a rape culture while ignoring sex abuse by foreign individuals (generally "brown"/muslim, ex. Rotheram, New Years Celebration Sex Abuses). It's galling to see Swedish govt officials wear the hijab to be "modest" while calling their countrymen sexists. Sometimes, "But what about these guys?" becomes "These fucking guys..."
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:54 PM
1

You won't find agreement broadly as there isn't an "MRA platform" aside from the issues directly relating to men's rights. The vast majority will want alimony reform. There isn't a consensus on abortion, immigration, healthcare, etc. The MRM isn't a political party. There will be disagreements.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:47 PM
4

Mark Pearson's accuser gave testimony from behind a curtain I believe.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:40 PM
6

I'm astounded by how many degenerates are lauded as iconic/influential feminists. And they still do it, decades later like having a convicted torturer/murderer speak at the Women's March. Seriously, it cannot be that hard to find a woman who was hard done by the law who was given lesser charges...
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:38 PM
2

Okay but how is that rape and not reckless endangerment? You're putting no condom on the same level as forced sex.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:22 PM
1

I'm not worried by that at the moment. For example the outcomes of single mother households is a very nurture centric argument.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:18 PM
1

women for alimony reform exists at least
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:15 PM
1

Warren was a board member of NOW in New York iirc
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:12 PM
2

Moderate Feminists only believe rape culture but not wage gap?
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:07 PM
3

Taylor House for Men is a domestic violence shelter for men. If you donate make sure to leave a note allocating your donation for this purpose. Florida Dream Center are in the process of establishing a center for boys who are victims of sex trafficking. Foundation for Individual Rights in Education have pursued the current issues with campus "courts", Title IX abuse, and due process violations against male students. National Coalition for Men I think is the oldest men's issues group in the US. T…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 09:52 PM
2

I knew sitting alone would be the only time it was possible, but I would sit there and try to actually cry, to let it out, decompress. It wouldn’t work. So I would vacate the area, go to somewhere no one could hear me and I would scream at the top of my lungs, I’d punch trees or run as fast as I could until I puked. It helped for a long time.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 04:07 PM
1

Anyone know which recommendations were accepted?
/r/MensRights22/02/17 04:05 AM
1

In what country do you live?
/r/MensRights22/02/17 04:02 AM
1

Gays == homosexual men
/r/MensRights22/02/17 04:01 AM
2

Will this be recorded as well?
/r/MensRights22/02/17 03:59 AM
3

Because the bill also entails forcing private companies to subsidize women specifically. Plus, levying a new tax on large companies doesn't even ensure it will provide for people who actually need it aka it will be providing to people who by definition already have jobs. And a tax credit on something that amounts to $2500 in a lifetime? If someone is that poor, they wouldn't even pay taxes to begin with. Aside from stipulations on homelessness and prison, it's a "gib me dat" bill meant to show t…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 03:57 AM
1

According to her, this bill already has 21 co-sponsors, all of them Democrats, including Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL).
/r/MensRights22/02/17 03:48 AM
1

I laughed more than I should have at this.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 03:43 AM
8

Duh, who needs friends or hobbies? A man cave will suit any man just fine! Just as long as the door locks from the outside.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 03:42 AM
3

So...Is gay a choice or biological? They aren't very consistent on that it seems.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 12:11 AM
3

I'm curious what similarities this has to the abolition of false promise as a crime. The justification was that the father couldn't have property rights to the daughters chastity.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 12:06 AM
3

She was paid more relative to screen time compared with the male costars.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 05:33 PM
1

Neonatal circumcision is considered safe when done by an experienced practitioner. Untrue. Acceptable by the standards is not the same as safe. Early complications include chordee, misplacement of the urethral opening, necrosis of the glans, and amputation of the glans. Late complications include cysts, permanent suture marks, inadequate skin removal, penile adhesions (skin bridges), phimosis, buried penis (penis retracts into the body), urethrocutaneous fistulae, inflammation, and narrowed uret…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:53 AM
2

Now remember that that applies to first world idiots screaming about "mutilation" just as much as it applies to third world idiots screaming "tradition". No it doesn't. The medical "benefits" of any routine infant genital cutting have been thoroughly discredited. For example, 61 asymptomatic boys would have to get their genitals cut to prevent a single treatable case of urinary tract infection. Also, HIV studies conducted in Africa were both not applicable to developed nations due to population …
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:25 AM
1

Almost a century of female suffrage with no obligation is tacit support for sex segregation of the SS. No feminist groups supported the National Coalition for Men suit re the SS.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 02:00 AM
2

Yes that is correct. Women in societies with normalized genital cutting commonly hold those beliefs, just like men in the US. It's one of the many parallels between the practices.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:57 AM
2

The further west, the more voting rights women had. Women could vote in varying capacities decades before 1920, and men didn't have suffrage until mid-late 1800s. On top of it all, women got the vote and no obligation. A century later they still don't. Yay equality.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:54 AM
1

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:50 AM
1

It's not just the draft, but selective service broadly. SS is tied to voting rights. Men must register, women do not. SS is also required for federal student aid and employment.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:42 AM
9

What else would you call a 30% criminal sentencing discount?
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:37 AM
8

Can we start with male rape victims not being forced into parenthood?
/r/MensRights20/02/17 01:36 AM
2

Very straight forward presentation. The only thing I found lacking was not having an example of the "barbells" aka homeless, suicide, dirty/dangerous jobs etc. Otherwise explains the points simply.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 05:42 PM
1

Posting from mobile? I don't see those glyphs in my browser, gives me an error glyph.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 04:26 PM
1

No sources on CDC bias you mean? The rape vs made to penetrate thing is one of the most well known examples.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 04:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter