TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

crazy89 Archive

View 81 posts and 99 comments by crazy89 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
687

crazy89/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:49 AM
216

crazy89/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:51 PM
161

Red Pill Examplecrazy89/r/TheRedPill05/08/13 09:32 AM
152

crazy89/r/MensRights03/02/13 09:20 PM
137

crazy89/r/MensRights24/03/13 10:46 AM
114

crazy89/r/MensRights12/09/12 01:12 PM
109

crazy89/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:23 AM
93

crazy89/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:46 PM
79

crazy89/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:36 AM
77

crazy89/r/MensRights18/09/12 02:57 PM
61

crazy89/r/MensRights07/01/13 10:45 PM
57

crazy89/r/MensRights26/12/12 06:41 PM
55

crazy89/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:47 PM
54

crazy89/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:06 PM
52

crazy89/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:21 PM
49

crazy89/r/MensRights24/04/13 11:24 PM
47

crazy89/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:59 PM
46

crazy89/r/MensRights17/09/12 06:10 PM
46

crazy89/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:49 PM
45

Blue Pill Examplecrazy89/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 08:35 PM
44

crazy89/r/MensRights17/06/13 08:51 PM
43

crazy89/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:51 PM
43

crazy89/r/MensRights10/09/12 02:27 PM
41

crazy89/r/MensRights10/08/12 03:26 PM
36

crazy89/r/MensRights22/09/12 01:00 PM
34

crazy89/r/TheRedPill20/10/14 06:59 PM
34

crazy89/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:44 PM
34

crazy89/r/MensRights25/12/12 12:45 AM
33

crazy89/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:27 PM
33

crazy89/r/MensRights14/09/12 09:11 PM
32

crazy89/r/MensRights22/03/13 09:35 AM
29

crazy89/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:52 AM
28

crazy89/r/MensRights26/08/12 04:01 PM
22

crazy89/r/MensRights22/12/12 04:29 AM
22

crazy89/r/MensRights02/08/13 12:59 PM
21

Blue Pill Examplecrazy89/r/TheRedPill01/11/13 07:04 AM
21

Red Pill Theorycrazy89/r/TheRedPill08/04/13 08:14 PM
20

crazy89/r/MensRights17/09/12 06:24 PM
19

crazy89/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:05 PM
19

crazy89/r/MensRights26/02/13 04:13 AM
18

crazy89/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:13 AM
17

crazy89/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:21 PM
16

crazy89/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:08 PM
16

crazy89/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:22 PM
15

crazy89/r/TheRedPill21/10/14 01:25 PM
15

crazy89/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:38 AM
15

Off Topiccrazy89/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 10:14 AM
15

crazy89/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:05 AM
14

crazy89/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:14 PM
13

crazy89/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:21 PM
13

crazy89/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:40 AM
13

crazy89/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:32 PM
13

crazy89/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:07 PM
12

crazy89/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:19 AM
11

crazy89/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:33 PM
11

crazy89/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:16 PM
11

crazy89/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:22 AM
11

crazy89/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:02 PM
10

crazy89/r/MensRights08/11/13 01:02 PM
9

crazy89/r/MensRights02/04/13 11:12 PM
8

crazy89/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:59 PM
8

Red Pill Examplecrazy89/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 10:03 AM
8

Red Pill Theorycrazy89/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 01:45 PM
6

Red Pill Examplecrazy89/r/TheRedPill12/04/13 11:02 AM
6

crazy89/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 07:15 PM
5

crazy89/r/MensRights14/05/13 02:06 PM
5

crazy89/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:41 AM
4

crazy89/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 12:37 AM
4

crazy89/r/MensRights15/08/13 04:59 AM
3

crazy89/r/MensRights05/10/12 06:40 PM
3

crazy89/r/TheRedPill25/03/13 12:04 PM
3

crazy89/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:15 PM
3

crazy89/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 03:45 PM
2

crazy89/r/MensRights20/06/13 01:00 AM
1

crazy89/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:17 AM
1

crazy89/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:39 PM
1

crazy89/r/TheRedPill27/09/13 03:01 PM
0

crazy89/r/MensRights07/08/12 01:27 PM
0

crazy89/r/MensRights14/11/12 12:28 AM
0

crazy89/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 11:35 AM
0

crazy89/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:30 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

FTR: Homeschooler here. This is a gross overgeneralization. It's not that you don't have a point; homeschooled kids do tend to be more introverted and less outgoing. They also tend to be much better writers and readers than their counterparts. I would say that the primary effect of homeschooling is that the kids tend to adhere much more closely to the culture and beliefs of their parents because their parents tend to be so much more closely involved with raising their kids than other parents (no…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 04:01 PM
2

You do know what 'satire' means right?
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 08:57 PM
3

I have no problem with villainizing whole organizations until they are willing to back the fuck off. They're the ones choosing to step into shit; we shouldn't feel bad about telling them that they smell like it. It's an easy fix for them. We just have to give them an incentive to do it.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/14 04:42 PM
1

Agreed, which is why I don't frame this as a "we need to organize and do something!" kind of issue. I'm just suggesting steps that individuals can take that will push back against and hopefully mitigate some of the ubiquitous anti-male hostility we see. Yes, Red Pill philosophy is primarily about mastery of self, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't also be interested in preventing a cultural takeover by anti-male forces that create impossible-to-navigate "yes means yes" laws and that criminalizes…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/14 04:38 PM
1

I don't disagree with the gist of your comment. Women do the majority of the spending, and corporations coddle them accordingly. Same with politics. You always hear about the "women's vote", but never about the men's, in part because women tend to vote in larger numbers. That being said, it's not a yes or no question ("Will it work or not?"). It's a question of whether it will have an effect. The Intel situation is a case in point. Corporations are extremely sensitive to criticism. They respond …
/r/TheRedPill21/10/14 04:31 PM
1

Sorry about that. Must have missed it.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/14 07:15 PM
1

New plan: Travel to Belgium with my handy tape recorder, go to various feminist events, and BLACK KNIGHT THE SHIT OUT OF THIS BITCH.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/14 11:57 AM
2

Fair point. I didn't catch that in the article. But even with that adjustment, the numbers still obviously don't come close to the claim.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 08:38 PM
50

Some "Does this make my ass look fat?" responses that I occasionally use: "Of course dear." "Wow. You'd better be careful about sitting down. I don't want you to break one of my chairs." "It's ok. I like a nice badonkadonk." "Stop talking and finish getting ready woman. We're going to be late." For "Is this/that girl prettier than me?", I usually go with the following: "Maybe. You think I should add her to my harem?" "I won't really know for sure until I see her naked. Let me get back to you." "…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 05:09 AM
2

Masturbation can also lead to lower T levels. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12659241?dopt=Abstract; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11760788?ordinalpos=16&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
/r/TheRedPill22/08/13 10:18 AM
2

Fair enough. #2 occurred to me as well as a major problem with the law--you shouldn't be stripped of parental rights without a criminal trial, though I was mainly focusing on #1.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 08:21 PM
12

"The bachelor's very capacity to avoid marriage is no more than a proof of his relative freedom from the ordinary sentimentalism of his sex, in other words, of his greater approximation to the clearheadedness of the enemy sex. He is able to defeat the enterprise of women because he brings to the business an equipment almost comparable to their own." - H.L. Mencken "If you are afraid of loneliness, don't marry." - Chekhov
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 10:05 AM
1

Pray tell, which venues are so pure where only honesty and integrity reign? Which venues are these where perception and style have no sway over persuasion? If you find these bastions of truth-seeking, please inform the rest of us so that we may seek them out. Your problem is that you mistake dishonesty for optimizing the perceptual value of your position. If you're cooking food that looks like shit, but tastes good, fewer people will eat it than if it both looks and tastes good. But making your …
/r/MensRights27/07/13 12:33 PM
2

The essence of successful debate is confidence and presence. Gain a mastery of the facts as much as possible, but at a certain point, it's just about controlling the stage. Disarm your opponents with humor if possible (does anyone remember anything about Reagan's debate with Mondale other than Reagan's joke about using age against his opponent?). Sidestep on issues that you don't know about, shifting the debate to issues you do know about. So when a feminist tells you "men do X" and "women suffe…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:09 AM
0

Bill Burr reminds us of a major part of the reason white women (and white people in general) don't age as well: Caucasians don't know about lotion. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryA4PNdzj-U
/r/TheRedPill25/07/13 12:12 AM
1

She doesn't have to pursue child support for you to be on the hook. If she ever files for any state subsidies, food stamps, etc., the state will automatically pursue child support "on her behalf", though the real reason is that they receive 1) a cut, and 2) federal subsidization proportional to however many child support orders they enforce.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 10:18 AM
10

I don't know; I think that the MRM can be the gateway to the RP for a lot of men.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 10:47 PM
2

Oooookay. Buhbye now. Make sure you take your meds so the nurses don't have to come have the orderlies strap you down again.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 11:32 PM
3

You're kidding right? Now anything relating to oil manufacturing is inherently suspect? We're not even talking about oil production mind you, just manufacturing using oil. You do realize that most manufacturing involves oil, right? That includes all plastics and most energy use in manufacturing. So computers, cars, bottled water, hairbrushes, appliances, pill bottles, tupperware, iPhones, etc. In fact, you're going to have a really hard time coming up with industries that don't use significant a…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:15 PM
2

Quite, but rationalization isn't problematic if it's supported by reality. There's a reason that most feminists aren't very attractive. Or rather, there's a reason that unattractive women are far more likely to be feminists than attractive women. It's all about position and incentives. The best way for attractive women to get what they want (material security) is by way of a man. Those men are likely to be unavailable to unattractive women to the same degree, so the best way for unattractive wom…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/13 10:03 PM
3

That doesn't even come close to being persuasive. I actually know quite a bit about both the Kochs and Heritage. Koch Industries is involved in a number of areas, mostly manufacturing in polymers, petrochemicals and the like (e.g. Styrofoam cups). Nothing dubious there. The Kochs have donated a great deal of money to various libertarian and conservative leaning organizations and projects, including the well-reputed Cato Institute, the Federalist Society, the Reason Foundation, the Institute for …
/r/MensRights13/04/13 09:44 PM
45

If you like Dutton's book, you should give him a positive review on Amazon to counteract some of the ideological criticism that's lowered its rating. Please note that I'm not encouraging an artificial inflation of the book. You should only give it 4-5 stars if 1) you've actually read it, and 2) you think that it merits those stars.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 01:25 PM
7

Even assuming that where they get their money from is relevant, what is wrong with money from the Kochs or Heritage?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 12:24 PM
1

Do not, do not, do not marry a lawyer. Law turns people into nasty, selfish, arrogant people.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:58 PM
1

Hence the need to master the system. It's an uphill battle, but if you can make the superiors as terrified of you as they are of teh wimminz (e.g. with the threat of a lawsuit), you can make some progress. The trick is finding a balance to where you can do that kind of thing without risking your career. Repeated complaints might be one way, though you risk making yourself "that guy" at work. If you are good at psychological manipulation, you can get one of these 'ladies' to make a public ass of …
/r/MensRights25/03/13 05:58 PM
1

I think this is one of those cases where the writer who writes the story isn't the one who writes the headline because the story itself isn't nearly as one-sided as the headline.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:41 PM
1

Yeah, and "she decided" they would live off his income. In New Jersey. Like that's never going to come back to bite him.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:52 PM
2

How about "men are awesome because all of the above, but the videos are pretty cool"?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:37 PM
1

Why would you ask questions of a know-nothing amateur journalist who distorted her research in order to get the results she wanted? Oh wait, you can ask her about that.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:24 PM
5

Keep up the good work.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 04:02 AM
5

Obviously, but we're talking about tendencies, not a general theory of accident causation. Testosterone has a few effects that make men slightly more likely to engage in behavior involving physical risk. For example, testosterone reduces unconscious fear (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15939408). It also releases in such a way as to be a better pain reducer than estrogen (http://pain.about.com/od/research/f/men_vs_women.htm). If you feel less fear and less pain in any given situation, you're…
/r/MensRights11/01/13 08:59 PM
7

True, but it's not so simple. "Nearly 16 percent of male HR professionals expressed an anti-male bias where 0.5 percent of women demonstrated an anti-female bias." Female bias may be much worse, but men aren't exactly doing each other many favors here either.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 08:27 PM
2

One risk would be that prosecutors and/or police officers would falsify evidence to guarantee a conviction, but there's already an incentive for that (conviction rates), and I don't really think there's much more danger you could add, given that prosecutors already have a pretty strong incentive to convict. Another risk might be a man and a woman cooperating to commit fraud on the court. E.g., she could bring claim, later recant, and he could collect the money, or she could bring the claim, and …
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:31 AM
9

Technically no. False rape accusations = mistakes OR fraudulent rape accusations. The former is simply inclusive of the latter. The problem is that many news reports and even legal references use "false rape accusation" to refer to intentionally fraudulent accusations, which muddies the waters. And no, we shouldn't fry a person for a mistake, but think of this in the criminal context. If you intentionally kill someone, it's murder. If you accidentally kill them, it's involuntary manslaughter if …
/r/MensRights08/01/13 02:56 AM
7

My other suggestion (equal parenting) should take care of child support issues, but absent that, child support should be statutorily capped at (e.g.) 20% of a person's current income, which the burden resting on the state to demonstrate that a person actually has the ability to pay without being forced into the poorhouse.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 03:25 AM
3

Most laws are already purportedly neutral when it comes to child custody. It's the practice that's discriminatory. In lieu of changing that, I think the best solution is to have a strong presumption in favor of shared custody with equal time, only allowing a shift from that in cases where one parent or the other is clearly unfit or incapable of being an effective parent (e.g. is in a psychiatric institution). That way, judges and related individuals wouldn't have the discretion to act on their b…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 03:21 AM
1

He may be able to file a collateral attack against the conviction on the grounds of inadequate assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, (1984). As with most collateral attacks on a conviction, it doesn't stand a very high likelihood of success. But it is a shot, and if your friend can satisfy the two-part test in Strickland, he can get the no contest plea thrown out and gain the opportunity to plead not guilty: A convicted defendant's claim tha…
/r/MensRights28/12/12 11:18 AM
0

You're way overreading this. Maybe you've got an ax to grind, but this article doesn't support what you suggest. Nowhere is it suggested that "girls are wholesome innocent obedient and docile creatures who can't possibly do anything wrong". Nowhere is it suggested that "males are naturally violent savage beasts in need of being tamed". But yes, children aren't angels, and human nature doesn't always cause us to behave in a manner befitting civilization, but that's nowhere near the same thing as …
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:48 AM
27

At least the comments in the article are uplifting.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:31 AM
10

Congress? You mean the ones who passed the VAWA that ignored violence against men?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:08 AM
1

You seem to be ignoring my argument, and then you turn around and make the insulting claim that I think mens rights is about "giving men the right to oppress women". That's completely false. I'm saying that pushing the standards of to the least common denominator of who happens to be offended by something harms men and male social relations. Women happen to express offense at a lot more things than men do (and people listen to their complaints more), so they tend to gain advantage at the expense…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:44 PM
-1

Now you're creating a straw man. Dickheads should get criticism. Telling a joke that makes someone uncomfortable is not being a dickhead. Failing to modify our customs and morals to whatever makes women the most comfortable is not being a dickhead. It's not "nude calendars", it's anything that might "objectify women". You can be a white knight all you want, but if you fail to understand how furthering the feminine priority to all areas of life is "feminization" and undermines men's well-being, c…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:09 PM
0

Are you an idiot? Welsh has emphasized the need to stop sexual assaults and harassment in the workplace since coming to office in August, and he told Air Force Times he had received multiple complaints about images, jokes and comments that made women and some men uncomfortable. The complaints indicated that many women felt they had to “go along to get along” with offensive images and comments if they wanted to steer clear of trouble. "In my view, all this stuff is connected. If we’re going to ge…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:50 PM
4

First, this is not a crazy question. It may still seem like science fiction to some folks, but the technological advancement is real. And second, your comment is a bit silly. You'd just be buying into feminist BS to believe it. No one's talking about genocide anymore than we would talk about killing off blacksmiths with the advent of modern metallurgy or killing off horses because we have cars. We're not talking about getting rid of anyone; we're only talking about breaking a monopoly. It's the …
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:35 AM
5

That's what makes ectogenesis so promising from a public policy perspective. It likely confers long term legal and social advantages to men, but it confers short term advantages of comfort and "happiness" to women. Given how women are making choices in society today, I have little doubt that they'll run towards it if it means avoiding the pain of childbirth, regardless of the long term implications for their social positions. I also doubt that the left will be able to sustain any moral argument …
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:30 AM
1

You could talk to a lawyer about putting together a lawsuit claiming, among other things, unlawful discrimination and possibly breach of contract (if you can find some provision in your rental--I assume it's rental--agreement that might apply).
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:37 PM
8

Just tell the truth as it stands, and people will come to their own judgments. Stories are an essential part of that, not just studies and statistics, because people won't fully appreciate the horror of what can and does occur without seeing such things as they actually happen from the perspective of a victim. People forget data. Stories stick with them. It doesn't come off as hating women unless that's what your preconceived notion of these stories assumes. It may be about hating this particula…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 08:00 AM
4

Four points: First, read this article: http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/family-courts/lessons-from-a-mens-divorce-seminar/. It goes into greater depth of the rest of my points. Second, approach this situation as if it is a war, with an excess of caution and overpreparation. For example, don't call her, don't contact her. If the opportunity arises, don't be alone with her. Put together a list of everything bad she's ever done (preferably with documentation), especially with regards to her …
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:22 PM
10

I'd only offer two points of caution in making this comparison. First, "due to time already served, Tahir could be released in September next year." The judge may well have simply wanted Tahir to serve additional time beyond her sentencing, thereby giving him a longer sentence than she otherwise would. Second, the article about Tahir does not indicate whether he pleaded guilty, as Jian Chen did. Pleading guilty almost invariably gets you a shorter sentence than you would otherwise receive, and i…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 12:05 AM
2

Congratulations.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:24 PM
1

My instinct, like a lot of other folks is to react with a resounding "Screw you bitch." However, I think you'd be wasting an opportunity in doing so. You should take the chance to engage in an effective debate. A few preliminaries: 1) Never lose your cool. You are always rational; any passion you exhibit is purely passion on behalf of male victims and not against your boss or feminists in general. 2) Be prepared with a strategy. This mainly means compiling a list of issues to use to demonstrate …
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:30 PM
8

Eh, I don't think this is a big deal. I mean, the guy may reasonably expect regular sex from a (potential) wife, but you don't just blurt that out on the third date unless you already know she's comfortable having that conversation. Some folks might think it a little premature. That said, this tidbit is nice: No romance, no friendship, no getting to know one another, no interest in my needs or desires -- it was all about him. I do so hope that she realizes that he could say the exact same thing …
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:39 PM
1

Right. That's why I posted the text, so you all wouldn't have to go searching through the page to find it.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:52 PM
5

But at least there are some judges who are permitting the use of expert testimony on PAS. http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2012/09/11/news/doc504fbf3ce9916764634059.txt?viewmode=fullstory
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:23 AM
0

Men are more at risk for long term damage from child abuse. Ergo, we have even more reason to stop telling little boys to "man up" when they suffer. Mainly, this is about the irony of our inclination to protect girls more than we protect boys when it seems as if the boys are being hit the hardest.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:54 PM
3

Since you both live in Colorado, that state's laws will govern any divorce. Colorado is not a community property state, but it is a marital property state, which is quite similar. Essentially, any property acquired by you during the marriage that is not explicitly set aside for one person will generally be treated as jointly owned. So that should include, for example, the SUV. Here are the things you have going for you: 1) You haven't been married long (3 years), which means she can't claim that…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:43 PM
-4

Didn't say there weren't. Doesn't change the fact that the study indicates that men are hurt worse in the long term by child abuse.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:16 PM
18

Response 5: Honey, if I were gay, I'd be all over you. Response 6: I DO like to think of myself as a pretty cheerful fellow. Response 7: No no no, you're confusing "gay" with "has standards". Response 8: Yes, why? Response 9: No, but if I were, I'd point out why that dress with those shoes is a DISASTER. Response 10: Oh shit, I'm sorry, I thought YOU were a dude. My bad. Response 11: Yeah, and that's why I fucked your daddy last night.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 11:01 PM
3

Or, in summary, DON'T GET MARRIED. It's too damn difficult and expensive to set all of this up and then to try and navigate your way out of it all. All it takes is one biased judge or idiot lawyer (and there are a lot of both of these), and you're fucked no matter how much you prepare.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 02:29 PM
3

Some states are better than others, especially when you acquire the bulk of your property before the actual marriage. So in community property states, you get to keep the property that meets two criteria: 1) you originally brought it into the marriage, and 2) the property doesn't become "commingled". Here are a couple of pieces summarizing the differences: http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/marriage-property-ownership-who-owns-what-29841.html; http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/pf/20060322a1.a…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 02:28 PM
1

For "whom". Shit. Seriously people. We're not a bunch of fucking barbarians. This is not 'nam. There are rules.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:45 AM
5

The problem with your suggestion is that moving to another state won't make a difference as far as divorce laws are concerned. The governing law for divorces is in the state in which you both last cohabited, which means that no matter where you move to before you divorce (unless your wife moves with you), the laws of the state where she remained, in this case California, would apply no matter what.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:19 AM
2

One nice thing about Virginia: no common law marriage, period. They're pretty vicious on child support though.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:15 AM
14

You may want to prepare a slander suit against her. Don't file, but if it looks like she's serious, make sure she knows that you're prepared to file a lawsuit that will bankrupt her in order to protect your reputation.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 09:25 PM
4

It's extremely doubtful that anything that happened from when you were 7 or 8 would ever come back to bite you from a legal perspective. Even if you were of age, the statute of limitations on rape is typically around 5 years or so. Now, if your cousin is a vindictive bitch, she might be able to create social/employment problems by leveling false or misleading accusations.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 09:15 PM
5

You're fighting an uphill battle against three separate forces. First, the media, culture, and academia all portray women's issues as the only important issues, women as the only ones who truly suffer, and men as the culprits who are the cause of these problems. This conception has been so thoroughly grounded in our society that overcoming it will probably take more than a few dissenting voices to get individuals to listen. Second, we teach men, almost from the point of birth, not to complain ab…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 08:53 PM
2

Yeah, that would be a fairly big concern if there were no standards for submissions. We don't want to become evil to beat evil. Hence the term "proven" in parenthesis and the caveat that the list needs to be "properly managed".
/r/MensRights14/09/12 11:27 PM
1

That's deemed to be a part of the crime itself. The instigator is something called a "principal in the third degree". Independently, you'd also be able to convict on the conspiracy to commit murder. I don't defend false accusers (believe me I don't), but I do believe that many women who make those kind of accusations don't think about the consequences of their decisions. It's substantially different to do something terrible to a person that happens to result in violence being committed against t…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 09:36 PM
-1

1) That's a pretty damn broad definition of violence then. How about we just call it "doing wrong" or "harming others". 2) You're still only talking about one subset of the hypothetical, resulting in "social or employment problems" isn't getting someone thrown in jail, and there are a great many legal problems that don't involve getting someone thrown in jail.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 07:01 PM
1

Or that may just be my upbringing in a feminist culture speaking.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:51 PM
-1

I think part of what he's talking about is self-defense, and he never mentioned violence.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:49 PM
2

When you say "would you do the same", I assume you're referring to making some sort of a false accusation against her. I don't like to tell lies, so the answer is that I wouldn't make any false accusations. However, I might construct my own mental reality in which I convinced myself that she did something horrible, and then accuse her based on that. I'd be telling the "truth", my truth anyway.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:40 PM
0

Only on the parallel universe that is Slate.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 06:02 PM
2

I think you're reading too much into this. The desire to become powerful, popular, or wealthy isn't a selfish or greedy ambition. It's a natural desire based on survival instincts that have evolved over millions of years. The man with more power and position could protect and promote his family and community much better than those without, so it would be natural to develop an instinct to pursue those things. Women complemented that role by serving as the nurturers and carers of the family being …
/r/MensRights14/09/12 01:44 PM
1

It's clear where the future of male employment must lie: military conquest.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 11:40 PM
1

Don't argue, mock. And man, there are so many good lines I can think of for this. Here are a few just off the top of my head: "Yeah girls! That's right! Embrace that slut! (Incidentally, my number is 909-555-6829.)" "Could you bring out the pretty ones please?" "If you can walk straight this morning, then you're not REAL sluts." "Let's hear it for women's rights! . . . the right to get into the kitchen and make me a damn sandwich."
/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:01 PM
2

You can contact the EEOC. It's certainly a lot harder for you, but there are cases where white males have succeeded in discrimination claims. The context of the situation (all women + the statement about training being plainly untrue) helps your case. The biggest problem I think you'll have is that you haven't presented any actual evidence of discrimination. If you could give testimony (sign an affidavit) about any particular statements that were made by senior folks implying misandry, that woul…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:10 PM
3

Be exceedingly careful. She may be cooperative now, but flip on a dime later. I'd recommend seeing a lawyer (discretely), but in any case, you should take a few simple steps to hedge against future risks. Get an agreement in writing quickly. Keep careful records (with proof) of any violations of that agreement, minor or otherwise. Do the same with any misconduct on her part, major or minor, whether it's any act of violence or verbal threats or adultery or even fudging on a tax return. Be very ca…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 06:16 PM
1

I think this describes much of the same mentality. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJRzBpFjJS8
/r/MensRights12/09/12 04:11 PM
2

Have you already gone through the courts? Do you have a legal custody agreement?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 02:52 PM
1

Fair enough, but he's not wrong here. Richard Lynn, a well respected IQ expert and Professor Emeritus of Psychology at the University of Ulster, makes the same basic argument: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1274952/Men-ARE-brainy-women-says-scientist-Professor-Richard-Lynn.html?ITO=1490&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:%20dailymail/femail%20%28Femail%20%20Mail%20Online This piece, discussing the separate issue of the Flynn effect, lays out the whole argument, in…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:10 PM
13

Could you create one to downvote those entries?
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:07 PM
8

This seems like a pretty straightforward example of victim blaming.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:04 PM
22

The United States has diplomatic relations but no extradition treaties with the following countries, which are listed in alphabetical order: Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, the Central African Republic, Chad, China, the Union of the Comoros, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Cote d' Ivoire, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Jord…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:09 AM
12

Men don't gloat for the same reason the Yankees don't gloat when they win the World Series. They're just meeting an expectation, not surpassing one.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:53 PM
7

I know; the piece discusses that possibility. That last paragraph was mainly tongue-in-cheek.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:00 PM
2

If you want to have a little fun with her, just say "Shhhhhh! I'm trying to enjoy the view."
/r/MensRights10/09/12 02:31 PM
41

Three points. First, Flynn's research has been greatly exaggerated; he himself has said that it has been misconstrued. He argues that there are no significant cognitive differences between men and women; the fact that the women in his study do fractionally better than the men is because women "are also more focused in the testing room just as they are more focused in the classroom. So my conclusion is the sexes on the Raven's is probably dead equal for cognitive factors and there is a very sligh…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 02:12 PM
1

Just posing a hypothetical here, but what if you took steps on your own? What if you contracted a PI in Peru to track down your ex-wife and kids, then hopped on a plane there, picked up your kids, and brought them back home? You wouldn't tell her; you could wait until she left for work, then you'd go in and take your kids, hop back on a plane and fly to the U.S. What could she do then? Come back to the States? She broke the parental agreement, and you'd have broken no U.S. laws. I'm not suggesti…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 02:29 PM
5

FactCheck.org with the Annenberg Center was all over Obama for this lie a few months back. http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-77-cent-exaggeration/
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:20 AM
1

It depends on what you want. If you genuinely think that the child might be yours, and you want to become involved, your best option is to approach her. The downside of this is that you're likely to be on the hook for support. If you don't care about whether the child is yours and you don't want to get involved, then keep your head down. Don't approach her, don't give her a reason to come after you for support. Make yourself as inaccessible to her as possible. If it were convenient (and it doesn…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:59 PM
5

Alimony is unrelated to children. There's child support for that.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:24 AM
2

Don't be obtuse. It's not a "just following orders" defense. It's a "she didn't do anything wrong" defense. Secretaries of State represent the interests of the nation to the rest of the world. It's more like being somebody's lawyer or accountant. Or do you think that lawyers who represent murderers are also culpable for murder?
/r/MensRights21/08/12 05:30 PM
1

Under practically every criminal code, the girl could be convicted of conspiracy to commit murder given these facts, which carries the same sentence as murder. Whether or not they'll prosecute her is a different question.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:17 PM
-1

History implies that it is true, and there are well documented differences between men and women in terms of drive towards socialization and social acceptance as well as the standard deviation for IQ and other measures of success.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:50 PM
1

No one said that here, but the article argued that men are more natural leaders by virtue of women's tendency to follow whatever zeitgeist happens to be dominant at the time. Ergo, men are more likely to have those "natural leadership skills", which require the sort of risk-taking and social separation to which women are ordinarily averse.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:22 PM
-2

If you don't get the difference between oppressing and leading, then you should definitely not try to be a leader.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:44 PM
3

That reminds me of this story. Turns out Jack the Ripper may have been a woman. http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/archive/world-old/was-lizzie-williams-jack-the-ripper/story-e6frev00-1226351464408
/r/MensRights06/08/12 05:41 PM
1

At least there's a link to it on Drudge.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter