TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

da1inchpunch Archive

View 70 posts and 392 comments by da1inchpunch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
346

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights14/01/13 03:27 AM
273

da1inchpunch/r/MGTOW15/03/17 08:23 PM
243

Discriminationda1inchpunch/r/MensRights15/10/15 07:43 PM
206

Newsda1inchpunch/r/MensRights14/04/15 09:03 AM
178

Generalda1inchpunch/r/MensRights16/08/15 01:19 AM
127

Feminismda1inchpunch/r/MensRights23/01/17 02:10 AM
118

Social Issuesda1inchpunch/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:45 AM
110

Feminismda1inchpunch/r/MensRights16/01/15 10:26 PM
79

Storyda1inchpunch/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:09 AM
69

WBBda1inchpunch/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:09 AM
68

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights19/01/17 02:28 PM
66

WBBda1inchpunch/r/MensRights05/04/15 07:30 PM
56

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:57 AM
53

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights06/07/15 05:03 AM
49

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights07/12/14 09:24 AM
48

Clickbait Titleda1inchpunch/r/MensRights23/02/15 11:10 PM
44

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights08/10/14 08:56 PM
42

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights10/03/17 01:41 AM
40

Social Issuesda1inchpunch/r/MensRights27/09/15 10:06 AM
38

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights02/11/14 02:19 AM
31

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights29/01/16 02:21 AM
29

Feminismda1inchpunch/r/MensRights14/08/15 07:22 AM
29

Social Issuesda1inchpunch/r/MensRights07/09/15 10:27 AM
29

Feminismda1inchpunch/r/MensRights10/05/15 10:26 PM
28

Feminismda1inchpunch/r/MensRights10/12/15 08:51 PM
23

Discriminationda1inchpunch/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:19 PM
23

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights29/01/17 03:17 AM
22

Social Issuesda1inchpunch/r/MensRights13/12/15 03:05 AM
21

da1inchpunch/r/PussyPass23/02/17 11:02 AM
17

Misleading Titleda1inchpunch/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:16 AM
15

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:04 AM
15

Questionda1inchpunch/r/MensRights15/07/14 09:51 PM
14

da1inchpunch/r/PussyPass04/11/16 07:13 AM
14

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights12/03/17 07:53 AM
13

Generalda1inchpunch/r/MensRights01/06/15 09:53 AM
12

Social Issuesda1inchpunch/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:00 AM
10

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights09/04/15 05:19 AM
10

Feminismda1inchpunch/r/MensRights29/10/15 06:32 AM
10

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:46 PM
9

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights28/01/17 02:20 AM
9

Generalda1inchpunch/r/MensRights29/10/15 11:38 PM
8

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:15 AM
8

Feminismda1inchpunch/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:45 AM
7

Feminismda1inchpunch/r/MensRights24/10/15 07:21 AM
6

Fathers/Custodyda1inchpunch/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:57 AM
5

Questionda1inchpunch/r/MensRights14/09/14 08:25 AM
5

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:50 PM
4

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights28/01/17 04:14 AM
4

Feminismda1inchpunch/r/MensRights10/04/15 10:53 PM
4

Clickbait Linkda1inchpunch/r/MensRights12/03/15 06:39 AM
4

Questionda1inchpunch/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:40 PM
4

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights26/01/17 03:28 AM
3

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights18/04/15 08:36 PM
3

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights30/01/16 12:12 AM
2

Newsda1inchpunch/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:11 AM
2

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:58 PM
1

da1inchpunch/r/MGTOW12/03/17 07:53 AM
1

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:22 PM
0

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights11/11/15 09:36 PM
0

Social Issuesda1inchpunch/r/MensRights28/09/15 07:43 AM
0

Dramada1inchpunch/r/MGTOW08/12/15 12:59 PM
0

Feminismda1inchpunch/r/MensRights28/01/15 12:33 AM
0

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights27/01/17 04:30 AM
0

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:28 AM
0

Crosspostda1inchpunch/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:11 PM
0

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:01 PM
0

Anti-MRAda1inchpunch/r/MensRights24/06/14 07:49 AM
0

Blogs/Videoda1inchpunch/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:06 AM
0

da1inchpunch/r/MensRights26/12/14 07:55 AM
0

Newsda1inchpunch/r/MensRights07/11/14 08:20 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You see one inch punch and your first thought is of a small dick. If that is where your mind goes then...
/r/MGTOW20/06/17 10:41 PM
1

No, you do. Don't project your dishonesty onto others.
/r/MGTOW20/06/17 10:39 PM
-6

You lie to people you don't care about. People you do care about you speak truth to. Unless you are just a cunt. In which case...is that your admission? That only people who are important to you are the ones you lie to? Your loved ones must be so very proud of you.
/r/MGTOW20/06/17 12:11 PM
2

Yet...
/r/MGTOW13/06/17 12:14 AM
2

Mos def. If she were a man she would be a champion. This is one stereotype I will be happy to see disappear. I wish I was getting as much as she seems to be.
/r/MGTOW06/06/17 04:32 AM
1

It has not changed much in Australia and it has been legal here for some time. In the eastern states.
/r/MGTOW26/03/17 08:48 PM
1

You do know it was a joke, right?
/r/MGTOW16/03/17 04:11 PM
2

It is a desperate cry for help. I should have turned it into a gif where I use Morse code to blink out : I am being held hostage by a mean bitch with a delusional ideology. Send Help!
/r/MGTOW16/03/17 03:23 PM
2

Then he'll be clear.
/r/MGTOW16/03/17 03:12 PM
3

Dr Linklater says we should be paying more attention to this disparity, and the effects that gender and colonialism have on young indigenous women, whom she says experience "double oppression". So now double oppression is now a thing because a feminist academic said it.
/r/MGTOW14/03/17 09:21 PM
1

yes.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 08:23 PM
11

Totally staged.
/r/PussyPass21/02/17 08:12 PM
1

To be strictly accurate, she is on trial, which is the opposite of getting a pass because of her gender. The outcome of the trial is not relevant until it happens.
/r/PussyPass09/02/17 04:22 AM
11

DO you even understand what pussy-pass means? She is not getting away with this. She is on trial for it.
/r/PussyPass08/02/17 09:27 PM
7

found this case where a man gets five years. However in this case he did punch the guy he glassed after he was unconscious so that probably explains the length of the sentence. But even a shorter one would likely have been custodial as well. But in this one we can see that yet another woman in 2014 got a two year suspended custodial sentence for glassing a guy and her lawyer used this excuse to mitigate “Thomas had been diagnosed with an emotionally unstable personality disorder and had struggle…
/r/PussyPass26/01/17 11:18 AM
2

And because they have a bunch of aging, narcissistic celebrities that are well-past their prime, desperately trying to stay relevant by acting as the podium voices for the people. No one fucking asked them too.
/r/PussyPass23/01/17 10:45 AM
4

Yeah, I wanna say that this is a white baby but it is a little hard to tell. Maybe Asian? In which case he'd be even more privileged than A white one.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 05:20 AM
2

My mistake. In Australia they only make the minimum.
/r/PussyPass22/01/17 09:33 PM
4

No, they probably got paid minimum wage.
/r/PussyPass22/01/17 08:48 PM
-6

still slave wqages
/r/PussyPass22/01/17 08:47 PM
7

Littering for a protest is still littering. Once you start breaking laws and causing a mess or public nuisance, you lose the high ground and your protest ends up in the gutter along with those signs.
/r/PussyPass22/01/17 08:47 PM
108

Millions of women march around US cites in protest that they are being oppressed by a misogynist president. No one gets is there way or causes violence or makes any attempt to stop or silence them in any way. Instead they are given the world stage on which they stand tall and bitch about their oppression. Because the "Patriarchy" won't give them a voice or take them seriously. And then expect their oppressors to follow along behind and quietly clean up the piles of shit they leave in their wake.…
/r/PussyPass22/01/17 08:43 PM
1

Lol.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 10:25 PM
16

Women are so used to being placed on a pedestal that equality feels like oppression. This sentence is the most concise expression of the problem with modern women today that have ever read.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 08:26 PM
48

If it had been her dad hitting her he never would have gotten bail.
/r/PussyPass18/01/17 09:41 PM
8

What a tremendous claim to fame. Something to share with the grand-kids, I'm sure.
/r/PussyPass22/11/16 08:02 PM
26

There are far fewer women in prison than men to start with — women make up just 7 percent of the prison population. This means that these women are disproportionately affected by a system designed for men. I love how they work with the precise opposite of reality and don't even notice they do it.
/r/PussyPass12/11/16 04:22 AM
3

I am slightly ashamed to say that this woman is from my home city. I am usually very proud of my city and it's people for the way we live in peace and behave as a metro populace, but with this grinning cunt walking free...
/r/PussyPass15/08/16 07:20 PM
9

Yes, but did the dog give consent and then withdraw it after the fact?
/r/PussyPass12/08/16 04:28 AM
49

This is not a pussy pass. She is being charged with it and it is being taken seriously and she has been named and photographed publicly. OP why do you believe she is getting away with anything?
/r/PussyPass12/08/16 04:28 AM
1

And? So what if it comes from the bronze age? Either she speaks truth and sense or she doesn't. Did you think you were being clever by pointing that out? Go on, do something clever again.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 09:26 AM
1

And in Australia we were decades ahead of everyone else
/r/MensRights29/01/16 10:39 PM
0

No you are.
/r/MGTOW07/01/16 05:06 PM
0

you are delusional by thinking something involving a name of a group of people who are all doing relatively the same thing is some how not a movement for some pathological fear of being named as someone in a movement. Fun.
/r/MGTOW06/01/16 03:54 AM
0

yes you are
/r/MGTOW25/12/15 12:12 AM
0

you don't understand what a movement is then. it s not a lie you fool, just an opinion, but you are so adamant that you are not a movement, clearly demonstrating that you are
/r/MGTOW20/12/15 03:17 AM
1

Of course you were blocked. You took away one of her toys.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 09:01 PM
2

That would ave had a much greater impact if you had refrained from using the abusive retort in brackets for some of them. Just let the stupidity of some of these statements stand, they don't need a commentary or addendum.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 07:37 PM
1

You are a bunch of people united under a banner. Definition: Movement. deal with it sir. it isn't cancer, just a label.
/r/MGTOW12/12/15 07:26 PM
1

I never said it was something to change the world. i said it is a movement. And it is. If you want to assign something to me to hate me for you need to try harder. I am no more an MRA than I am a feminist. I am at most an egalitarian. You are the only one here who seems to need to defend yourself as though you are being attacked. Calling MTGOW a movement is not an attack or an insult. it is merely an accurate descriptor. I think maybe you are just too sensitive about it. You are imagining critic…
/r/MGTOW10/12/15 01:20 AM
1

you are a movement, this is not a bad thing. Accept it.
/r/MGTOW09/12/15 12:26 PM
2

This is not a men's rights issue. People can get away from male LEO's as well.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 10:32 PM
1

neither. both premises are flawed and have no reality to them. Women are not victimized en-masse exclusively by men or otherwise.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:59 PM
1

Actually it is. it shouldn't be,but it certainly is that now. It is not yet as far out crazy as Feminism has become but we are stumbling headlong down that same hill. Feminism had sanity and right and facts on it's side once upon a time too.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:29 PM
1

well i have been dealing with pitchforks my whole life. Why should now be any different?
/r/MGTOW08/12/15 07:27 PM
1

no. but try again.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:27 PM
-3

MGTOW is not a fucking movement, it's a state of mind. Lol but I'll tell you a little secret: it's just not out in the open. You think you stumbled onto something profound? That aint a secret son, it has been obvious since day one.
/r/MGTOW08/12/15 07:22 PM
-6

You don't believe that celebrating a more convenient way of killing your unborn child has nothing to do with your male rights?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 09:45 PM
-2

Calling bullshit.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:50 PM
1

well punned
/r/MensRights26/10/15 07:19 AM
1

I love the poetry.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 11:34 AM
0

Cis is the new N-word
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:07 AM
9

This is in England
/r/MensRights16/10/15 02:45 AM
31

And she is played as the easily led victim who never really posed a threat. What a load of shit. If anything she was the kind of fool who would be convinced to strap on a bomb but the court thinks she is relatively harmless. Pussy pass wins again.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 09:33 PM
1

you can't stop being wrong. You contradicted yourself then call me stupid because I caught you out. fuck you. There is everything contradictory in what you said you doubling-down fool. go dump your massive insecurities about your own manhood onto someone who cares.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 06:46 PM
2

So you have now gone for inherently violent to a capacity for violence. Can't even keep your own argument straight. I have no shame, and you have n idea what I am or think or how I behave. your massive ego has clearly created some fantastic reality where this is somehow all about you. You really think this has anything to do with your personal emotional choices. It is a natural imperative. It has nothing to do with your masculinity or mine. Being capable of violence is vast difference from inher…
/r/MensRights15/10/15 01:55 PM
1

maybe they are jumping the skark
/r/MensRights15/10/15 08:16 AM
0

But here's the problem: violence is inherent to maleness. It's just a fact of life. no, it isn't. It may be a fact of your life, but not anyone else's by default.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 06:55 AM
2

Actually, yes. Actually no, Violence is a HUMAN value.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 06:53 AM
1

There is no humanity without a brain. Being of a certain shape doesn't give any rights Says you, not any law. you just make shit up as you go along don't you? stop trying to redefine the truth to justify murdering inconvenient children
/r/MensRights29/09/15 09:28 PM
2

I respectfully disagree. I see it as very much a men's rights issue. This creates a method of aborting a child without seeking a face to face with a doctor or psychologist and the father has even less power to do anything about saving the child when it is this much easier for a woman to abort it. I respectfully disagree. I see it as very much a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 11:32 AM
-2

Men are not claiming rights on your body, for the love of God pay attention! They are claiming rights on the individual life growing inside of you, and it is only a collection of cells for a short time. It is a living human- shaped being well within the first trimester, so stop misrepresenting the truth and get this through your head; Men don't want to control your bodies, they only want to have a say in whether or not their child inside of your body is killed or gets to live. That life inside a…
/r/MensRights28/09/15 08:55 AM
-2

and those are our children you are murdering. Stop ignoring that to be selfish. If you don't want to go through pregnancy then use protection or closer your legs. If you fall pregnant in this day and age it is almost certainly something that YOU could have avoided and now you want to murder an unborn child because you got too drunk to remember to take a morning after pill. Or whatever. Men have rights as fathers too. here is the thing. WE are not talking about women's bodies. We are talking abou…
/r/MensRights28/09/15 08:04 AM
1

stereotypes exist for a reason
/r/MensRights07/09/15 01:06 PM
4

Your mistake is in assuming,for no good reason, that this is even closely relevant to the topic in the video. It is about the title. perfectly titled. That is all it is about. It does not ignore anything or any part of an issue, it simply deals with how women manipulate men. Accurately. None of what you said is relevant to that. It is you creating an argument where there is none to be had.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 12:05 PM
2

very unlikely
/r/MensRights05/09/15 11:17 PM
3

This is so fucking wrong. Some guy asked a girl for directions and then leaves. How the holy fuck is this a criminal incident? You can't even ask directions from a child in public without being assumed to be a pedo or kidnapper? If this was a woman it would not even be a thing. If you read this statement from the NSW police, you'll notice it was not the child who was concerned by the man but an unrelated woman who witnessed nothing bad happen and decided to make an issue out of nothing because o…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 11:04 PM
0

Warning: paywall
/r/MensRights18/08/15 12:59 AM
3

disagree, I like chivalry,when it is deserved. It must be earned, not assumed. It is just a show of respect and kindness.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 03:16 AM
15

she got abortions for them all. So her body may be fine as long as she didn't have to carry past the 1st trimester.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 03:15 AM
4

Naomi Wolf sure loves the sound of her own voice
/r/MensRights14/08/15 07:50 AM
1

I swear to God that the title originally read dead beat dads. they have changed it. I'm not kidding. and there was a reference to dead beat dads in the first paragraph. They edited that too.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 08:36 AM
2

rape hysteria is a main talking point for feminist and in that narrative men can't be victims. Stories like this shoot that bullshit down. It is important. If a woman gets gang raped like that, you'll hear about it in the other side of the world for weeks. It happens to a man, and no one is reporting it the next day even in his own city. That is a men's rights issue if ever there was one.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:09 PM
2

No, men raping men is a gender issue in regards to how feminist movements and mouth pieces have said that rape is a female only problem and men get ignored and marginalized. This is just a post to keep an eye on so we can see how it will be reported or not reported. Does that clear it up for you?
/r/MensRights03/08/15 09:21 PM
2

Not interesting enough to be sensationalized. Probably.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 07:55 PM
6

excellent point.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 01:32 AM
3

women are paid as much as men.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 07:34 PM
1

I forgot you existed.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 09:47 PM
1

My whole premise is that globally many do. No your premise was US based and used to justify your sexual desire for young teenagers(Children to the rest of civilized society) and globally many do not. And ou definition is clearly that the age of consent is for when an adult can have sex with a child. Most of those lower age consent laws are specifically for when both parties are not legally adults. It is not so you can fuck children. By far the vast majority don't have it that low and you know th…
/r/MensRights17/06/15 01:55 AM
1

no, you're wrong, none have it below sixteen which was your whole premise. How? seriously? fuck you!
/r/MensRights16/06/15 09:46 PM
1

you are still justifying being a pedophile. Nowhere in the US is the age of consent lower than sixteen you clown. Never said it was. You do realize that other countries have states like Mexico, right? except for that time when you said most states and countries have the age of consent between 14-16. yeah, except for that time.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 09:30 PM
0

Listen here you cunt, you actually just tried to justify being a pedophile, and yes you said "most states and countries" And I proved you wrong. Most states and countries average over 16 fro the age of consent. I said most states and countries have it at 14-16. If you look at the map you'll notice that that the vast majority of those countries/states are in blue(13-16), including the US. Very few are in the green(17-18), so I am right. :) No you are not. Your sources, which you haven't bothered …
/r/MensRights16/06/15 01:32 AM
1

yes, general information. The specifics are in the link I gave you, which are not on Wikipedia. Wikipedia has contradictory numbers. You really didn't read your own sources did you?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 01:18 AM
1

And try a real source. Fucking Wikipedia! You expect to be taken seriously?
/r/MensRights15/06/15 10:53 PM
1

You are a twat and you still don't know what you are talking about. where is this 14-16 you are claiming? You need to read you second source more carefully as it proves you wrong and me right. Your claim was that most states put the age of consent between 14-16 and then read you 3rd source as it does the same thing. You lazt uneducated fuckwad who can't even do better than a quick google search and a wiki copy/paste. What you also completely fail to recognize or admit is that being able to conse…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 10:42 PM
1

You are living in a delusion. The age of consent in most states or countries is 18. 14-16 are children you pedo.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 10:10 PM
1

See that right there, that is you hamstering why it's not his fault NO. It is me stating reality. You NEED to think beyond your little TRP catch phrases and mantras like Hampstering because they limit your ability to think . They are your current box that you can't think beyond. So you are a fence sitter, not going to make the call either way, why am I not surprised. So where does your righteousness come from? Proven here with your fundamentally binary viewpoit. Brelief in a God or metaphysics i…
/r/askTRP09/06/15 12:40 AM
0

Let me guess, religious background look for an excuse to blame women for all your troubles? agnostic. Strike one. Whatever bro, get over yourself and FYI all the shit that has happened to you with women, totally your fault. Blaming a woman for cheating in front of her boyfriend is not having a problem with women. I am not thinking about any of the women I have met in my lifetime, but you clearly seem to associate this story to the women you know and project that stupid childish shit back onto me…
/r/askTRP02/06/15 12:46 PM
1

it makes no sense to you because you lack the wisdom I mentioned before. The solution for you is black and white, direct and aggressive. certainty. Life is grey and complicated in even the smallest and insignificant ways. If you had a mature wisdom, you would know this. You do not know this.
/r/askTRP02/06/15 10:58 AM
1

and you have demonstrated that you lack that mature wisdom. everyone, no matter how small, has a part in everything that occurs to them. It is not about blame, it is about owning your part, whatever that is and no matter how small. throwing the entirety of the blame onto the woman is pointless as this man dated this woman who was likely cheating on him for some period of time and he failed to see it. He has a part to be responsible for.
/r/askTRP02/06/15 10:15 AM
1

Standard bullshit comments and apologetic men in the article's comment section. Nothing new here.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 10:02 AM
1

NP. You are welcome.
/r/askTRP02/06/15 07:43 AM
2

But now I have this girl asking me to do it. I don't like anyone telling me how I need to groom myself, You said it yourself. She is not telling you to do it, she is ASKING you. Do it or don't. Stop whining, be a man!
/r/askTRP02/06/15 07:42 AM
1

That is not and has never been true. Sure, inhibitions are lowered when drunk, but that does not make someone more honest or more real. It just makes them drunk. Nothing more.
/r/askTRP02/06/15 07:33 AM
0

She emancipated you in front of a stranger, and all you want to do is figure out ways to forgive her. Do you even know what emancipation means? It means to free something or someone. Perhaps you meant emasculation ( to figuratively cut the balls off of a man)?
/r/askTRP02/06/15 07:31 AM
1

But I don't want to believe that! :( And she knows this, that is why she did what she did, she knows you are blinded to the reality of what she is. She gets away with it because you don't want to believe. There are 4 billion women in this world and most of them are loyal and loving. Go out and find one of them and leave this bitch in your dust.
/r/askTRP02/06/15 07:25 AM
1

recognizing your own part in everything that goes on in your life is a great sign of mature wisdom, however others do righteously deserve to be blamed in most circumstances. This,I believe, is such a case. This woman needs to show some respect and loyalty.
/r/askTRP02/06/15 07:19 AM
1

Here is an idea; next time you are with her in public or whatever, flirt with another woman and give her your digits in front of her. Gauge her reaction. You already have your ammo loaded and ready to fire.
/r/askTRP02/06/15 07:16 AM
1

Ask her straight up what her intentions and thoughts were at the time. If you have been dating for half a year then you know how to tell when she is lying by now. Make it open an honest. if she makes it or tries to make it anything less, she is cheating on you or is planning to. She has never given me a reason to doubt her fidelity or our relationship Well clearly she just did. that is why you are here now.
/r/askTRP02/06/15 07:13 AM
4

that just described the underlying motivation behind 99% of straight women.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:50 PM
2

They will just redefine rape to exclude those people. Rhetoric is easy when you have the self proclaimed authority to rewrite the dictionary.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:47 PM
1

So the TL;DR of this article is a stupid woman believed some ridiculous things from a con artist and now she wants a law that stops people from exploiting her willful stupidity because she can't grow up and take responsibility for HER mistakes. This is basically a victim creation bill. If it becomes law then it will create imaginary victims of mainly women and real persecuted victims of mostly men.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:44 PM
4

I told her I wasn't interested in continuing a conversation that began with the implied threat of assault, and attempted to walk away Translation: I said Fuck off bitch!
/r/MensRights25/05/15 09:58 PM
3

In Australia the police can do that. they chose not to.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:29 AM
1

So Jezebel actually dd some journalism. Fuck me!
/r/MensRights23/05/15 09:56 PM
1

don't be a cunt. Pretty simple.
/r/askTRP20/05/15 05:12 AM
1

You can still comment on the post.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 09:56 PM
3

http://snewsi.com/id/15214326346/Bloodstained-Men-take-over-Fountain-Square-to-protest-circumcision
/r/MensRights19/05/15 09:11 PM
1

proof?
/r/MensRights19/05/15 09:02 PM
1

sense*
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:54 PM
2

yeah, that really happened too.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:53 PM
5

fuck that feminist echo chamber
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:47 PM
2

because rape comes with an identifying accusation, reporting a stolen car most likely does not. When you accuse someone of a rape or any crime that person needs to be considered innocent until proven guilty. if the police immediately believe the accusation then their constitutional rights are being violated. Presumptive innocence is a right.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:10 PM
6

From the guardian article Now we always believe the victim in the first instance. Sometimes, when investigating, we can prove that the victim has lied or misunderstood or whatever. But we start off by believing them.”
/r/MensRights17/05/15 10:06 PM
2

Nobody thinks calling a woman a cunt is misogynist. plenty of people do.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:28 PM
2

they sound like standard programmed responses that she gave you.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:26 PM
2

See you next Tuesday cunt!
/r/MensRights16/05/15 10:55 AM
5

An Australian calling their mate a "good cunt" You mean "sick cunt" Aussie here. I agree with everything else you said and you are welcome. I love the word too. It is nearly all purpose like shit and fuck.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 10:24 PM
7

The TL;DR is, I get upset so everyone else should change their behavior to suit my inability to control my emotions and lack of maturity.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:20 PM
0

She has a legitimate gripe even is she is blaming the myth of rape culture. She should be blaming the school admin.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:11 PM
0

sexism is about thinking of a gender in prejudicial ways or ignorance of a gender or generalizations about a gender in exactly the same way racism is expressed, but for a race instead of a gender. the principle is the same and sexism is expressed in many ways.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 09:16 AM
0

sexism isn't just about discrimination.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 06:07 AM
-4

no it isn't.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 01:20 AM
-2

equal sexism is still sexism. It was wrong to put those images on buses. Not horribly wrong as the feminists like to exaggerate it into, but not good either.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:30 PM
-8

It is a weak but predictable response from feminists but the do have a point. This kind of objectification goes on too much and on buses? Yong kids ride on those. They advertisers should ave put much more thought into this. I know, Whiny feminists - blah blah. but they have a point this time.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 09:27 PM
-6

I posted the legal, dictionary, and medical definitions for the word so you have not read shit. Fuck you, you pedo-enabler. Don't insult me because you are too lazy and self absorbed to read. Do your fucking work.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 09:13 PM
-5

so you did not read my two other sources then? And the dictionary is the definition handbook so it is a good source. All of my sources came from he first page of a google search so look them up yourself you lazy clown. Pedophiles fuck children, stop defending them and protecting them you enabler.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:26 PM
-7

It seems to me that you have been sexually abused, and you are projecting your ignorance and hate without understanding. Wrong. so all of your assumptions based on this are also wrong. too bad. it looked like an interesting paragraph.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 11:27 AM
-9

read my comments and see what you ignored. if you are going to argue against them, you should try reading them first.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 09:33 AM
-9

engages in sexual acts with a prepubescent child of the same or opposite sex. Excuse me?I did what now? prove myself right? Is that what i did? The Or is not relevant as someone who has strong urges to fuck children WILL fuck them eventually as surely as an addict WILL use drugs eventually. This is an addiction. The video is a source for that. A pedophile is someone who fucks children in the here and now, or eventually. What retarded idea of a planet do you live on where some sick fuck with powe…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 09:32 AM
-6

so you ignore the rest of that source that states it requires tow aspects to diagnose pedophilia, one of which being having had a sexual act with a child. or was that too much truth for you to handle that you chose to ignore it and pretend it was not written right below aqt you just quoted? call me out for cherry picking! fuck you.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:23 AM
-9

Ah! So ignore a source that makes me right for one that makes you right-You think. I gave you the diagnostic, legal, and dictionary definitions. you give me one PDF. Good for you. Now do your research properly.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:23 AM
-11

yes, it does. that is one of the requirements for that specific diagnoses. learn before you speak.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:25 AM
-7

Wikipedia is user edited and not remotely reliable as a source of accurate information. try actual medical, legal, and dictionary definitions. Also I said molester not abuser. semanitcs is not a point or argument.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:25 AM
-8

We can also see that you skipped over the Wiki articule You claim my source was unreliable then you say I jumped over the wiki? Wikipedia is now the most reliable source? What planet are you from? Here is another surce that speaks of the legal definition. http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/P/Pedophile.aspx So how ignorant do i appear when i am the only one offering evidence? unless your evidence is somehow invisible? No? i guess it does not exist then. easy to criticize evidence when you hav…
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:21 AM
-13

phile you are correct. I made a mistake. But pedophile does mean child fucker.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:44 AM
-6

I am sorry if you can't deal with your desire to have sex with children, but a pedophile is a plain expression of the English language and you don't get to be a better person by trying to redefine it. Pedophiles fuck children. If you don't you are not a pedophile. But a child abuser may just hit a child, not necessarily have sex with them. Abuse is variable, sex with children is not. I am sorry if plain English is too complicated for you. Try Google yourself loser.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:43 AM
-8

A pedophile is someone who has sex with children, not just someone who is attracted to them. Pedo = child phile = sex. it is not rocket science and you are clearly trying to excuse your attraction to children.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 03:41 AM
-6

can't be bothered. Sorry. wait til you have more time and watch it again. it is near the middle.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 02:16 AM
-13

no. we cannot. they are the same.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 02:15 AM
-4

I really liked her anecdote about her conversation with Germaine Greer. It really demonstrates the level of pure disdain and vilification that exists in the minds of the moist prominent and respected feminists.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 11:58 PM
1

She is probably planning a run in politics.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 09:14 PM
2

There never has been any real difference.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 07:22 AM
1

His point
/r/MensRights14/04/15 09:30 PM
2

A new chew toy for the sub. Notice they disabled the comments for this video but others in the series allow comments. It's almost like they knew there would be a mountain of discourse that they desperately wanted to avoid having to address.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 10:53 PM
2

Tell Hillary Clinton that.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 10:41 PM
3

This is not for debunking that argument but they may help you in the future: 1. From an early age the opposite sex will be instructed never to hit me but I may not be given the same instructions. However, should I strike males I can expect not to be hit back and any social penalties that occur from my actions will actually fall on the male. 2. If I’m not smart, but pretty, I can marry and achieve the social and financial level of my husband without ever working. 3. I can produce offspring. A sta…
/r/MensRights10/04/15 08:40 PM
1

so flag it then
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:58 PM
1

Some people need to here it. If someone is full of shit and not willing to open their mind, they are not worth investing yourself in. You must be true to yourself. If being amicable means letting sexist nonsense pass and staying quite when you are hurt by it then fuck amicable. Be true to yourself. If she is worth it, she will see that you are and respect that. If she has no respect for you as you speak your truth, then SHE HAS NO RESPECT FOR YOU. It is really simple though, for a coounter agrum…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:07 PM
-1

By saying bullshit as often s possible.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:20 PM
8

It is only more of the same. Unfortunately there still exist a large number of men who do nothing to help a progressive men's rights movement. They hold us all back. The reality is that the loudest, and so most exposed opinions, come from the dumbest of people. Moderates, as most of us are, speak with quite reason and patience. But if the loudest voices in any argument are the ones that most people hear, and are also the dumbest voices, then it is forgivable to think that MRA's are all as bad as…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 10:20 PM
0

The law says different things in different places but all laws in the western world(To the best of my knowledge) agree that 15 is too young. In the past centuries there was no such thing as adolescence, children worked and labored. Children were married and had children of their own. not all, of course, but many. Adolescene is a modern concept. But I think we can agree that adults should not have sex with less that fully developed human beings. Full physical development can come at different tim…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:51 PM
0

You should go back to fucking your sister.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:43 PM
0

Yes, as a teen is not capable of making an informed adult choice so the teen is coerced by the adult. Coercion is force.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:07 PM
-4

If you are going to superficially insult and harshly judge a person based entirely on their head wear just to fulfill your need to feel slightly less pathetic and weak than you really are, then the least amount of decency you can muster is to not be ignorant of what you are insulting. But I suppose ti is too much to ask that people know what they are talking about when they puke out their random hate and self righteous attitude onto strangers.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 09:10 PM
-1

You should go back to fucking your sister.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 08:40 PM
-5

Not mad, just throwing shit at a troll. It may look the same but from the troll perspective, everything is about you.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 08:39 PM
0

No, you just defended a pedophile.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 08:37 PM
0

but really it is about the width of the rim
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:27 AM
-5

google it.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:27 AM
-2

Why do you assume that I am mad? Pointing out someone else's random stupidity does not mean I am mad. if you are going to ridicule someone or something, know what it is you are talking about first.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 10:26 AM
79

Of course she just rants up to him and slaps him like it is the most acceptable thing in the world. Bitch deserves to go to jail for that.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 09:14 AM
19

Those were trilbies, not fedora's.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 09:13 AM
0

Did you just defend a pedophile's actions because the child might have wanted it? Did you really just do that?
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:18 PM
1

Yes you are a troll who just dropped in on a joking conversation to insult a perfect stranger on the internet without provocation. So, for the record, eat a dick!
/r/MensRights20/03/15 12:29 AM
1

Instead, you group all feminists into one mistaken category. No, I don't. That is quite an assumption though. Feminism and gender equality go hand in hand. You really did stumble into the wrong sub didn't you? I have no harsh feelings toward anyone and then you come across as a repugnant ass. You're not scum because you're a man, you're scum because your comment thread makes you look like a repugnant asshole. but I have no harsh feelings toward anyone Lies and hypocrisy! You are a consummate fem…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 12:26 AM
1

Not everything I say is hateful or degrading toward women. You have no qualification for that lie. I talk about radfems in this post. You can't stand a man having an opinion so I must be scum to you. And you with your stupid and adolescent username showing you as a pothead. Anytime women get criticized it must be men hating and oppressing them rather than the women deserving criticism. I don't hate women, I love women. I hate stupidity from any gender. In this case, that is female stupidity. tom…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:53 PM
1

And you are an anonymous and irrelevant pothead troll. I hope you are proud.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:24 PM
-1

You are fucked in the head if you think sex with a fifteen year old is not abuse. Stop talking to me now you fucking pseudo-pedo
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:23 PM
1

So you expect me to take you seriously by doing the same thing? I gusee you didn't even read the post. Or you did and you agree with this steaming turd? Either way, fuck you! Spread you abuse onto someone else you lackluster troll.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:22 PM
0

Reproduction was what your body craved. Social constructs have made you translate that primal urge into fucking. It is not that. Anyone can have sex or reproduce at that age, that doesn't mean that they have the mental or emotional capacity for the reality of their circumstances. When you and I were fifteen, we could very easily fuck, though, if you were like me you never got the chance to, but we had no idea what consequences would have come about as a result of an affair with an adult Teacher/…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 08:53 PM
2

Just splice me off a new thread. I don't need the whole hog.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 08:43 PM
0

And when you were fifteen you were not able to fully understand the consequences of your actions and using the "They would be tried as an adult" excuse does not work. That just means that the law is wrong to treat them as adults, not that they should always be treated as an adult. Get your priorities straight my friend.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 07:24 PM
2

No I just upvoted you. Wait..I think we might be stuck in a loop.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 07:06 PM
0

A child cannot consent.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 07:04 PM
3

The woman will be out in 8 or 9
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:07 AM
2

Here is an article debunking it pretty well
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:06 AM
16

And it is about time some judge took a stand. In court Grant noted that there's often a double-standard in society about sex abuse cases, but maintained that, "Fifteen is 15. He’s still a boy figuring out the ways in the world. If this was a male teacher who had been involved with a 15-year-old female there would be people here hanging from the ceiling trying to get every drop of blood," Grant said. "But because it is a woman, there seems to be a winking about what happened." I love this judge s…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:16 AM
2

Well I was alive and aware five hours ago. I was just a baby forty years ago and Ill wager so were you or not even born. The things of that time are not relevant to today. The things of today are all that is relevant. That kind of past belongs where it is instead of brought up and rehashed as some reason to vilify and discriminate. And that is what feminist do these days. They bring up the inequality of the previous generations and try to make it as though this shit happens today. It does not. T…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:49 AM
4

lots of things happened 40 years ago. We don't live in that time any more. Arguments based in that time have no relevance now.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:54 PM
19

Guys have given us no choice but to be self-sufficient and self- reliant. This is a complaint?!?!? It is something to be happy about for the love of whatever twisted God you believe in!
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:05 PM
7

Jesus-titty-fucking-Christ! They are going after our smiles now? They can't stand the idea of a happy man.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 04:24 AM
2

Full of lies.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 11:08 AM
3

She is a one sided apologist. Maybe she should read something modern and then she would have a relevant opinion.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 05:35 PM
3

Feminist hypocrisy knows no generational limits. Bullshit is bullshit in any generation.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 05:20 PM
0

Downvoted for being an ass anyway.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 10:12 PM
1

a diarrhea of useless precious little snowflakes who can't think for themselves. all diagnosed with ADHD
/r/MensRights24/02/15 08:29 PM
1

That is not true. This story is only crafted to look that way. reading the ABC stories in the past is proof enough of that.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:37 AM
0

It is not irrelevant if the OP is lying about herself and lying to the people commenting. That is very relevant.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 07:56 PM
1

You should have posted it as the woman that you are, not the man you are pretending to be.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:58 AM
-6

OP is a woman and she is obvious.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:58 AM
1

I think it will be all over the next time a Kardashian flashes something or some douche celeb gets a baby bump. This is not important to them, they just don't have anything real to fill their lives with yet so they fill it with the readily available bullshit at hand.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:54 AM
1

No one is claiming it says exclusively. I posted the links to show that the definition is not what the Tumblrina say it is, so what exactly is your argument?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:35 AM
4

Sexism Racism
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:10 AM
1

Your sub, your choice, but here is some reality for you. Twitter names are no more names than reddit names are names. So check your logic on that. Sarkeesian is a men's rights antithesis. She stands up as a figure head for the very things that men are vilified for and she makes a living from that. How in the holy Hell is this not a men's rights issue? Her very existence and public voice is a men's rights issue. I have no idea how your logic worked on this post but it sounds like female logic to …
/r/MensRights28/01/15 01:39 AM
2

19,340 down 790 up That is 1 up vote to every 24 1/2 down votes. The People have spoken bitch! 95% of the people say "Fuck you!"
/r/MensRights17/01/15 11:54 AM
2

It is always good to remind anyone who may be on the fence about what she is like. Keep showing the ridiculous aspect to who and what she is. Keep her exposed, or she will get to speak retarded lies and commit fraud with no one to call her out.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 11:47 AM
2

Free Hat! Free Hat! Free Hat!
/r/MensRights10/01/15 11:36 PM
0

So where is the proof of a false accusation? I see an accusation and a denial. How do we know this is a false accusation?
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:59 PM
0

Surprisingly insightful and well written article for a Tea Party "journalist"
/r/MensRights03/01/15 05:23 AM
-1

Leave a comment on their page. Tell this hack of a journalist what she needs to hear.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 09:52 AM
1

That's not me saying there are black people clothes. That's me asking for pictures of them, No, it isn't Because I bet I can find pictures of white people wearing them too. It is you stating that you can find the pics, you didn't ask for anything. I'm willing to point out that "black people clothes" don't exist by supplying pictures of people of other races wearing them. How can people of other races be wearing Black people clothes if those clothes don't exist? You would just show me picture of …
/r/MensRights06/12/14 11:02 AM
1

So what are black people clothes? Because I bet I can find pictures of white people wearing them too. No, I am not illiterate. Are you retarded or just immensely forgetful?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 08:36 PM
0

Yeah, they are called wiggers. And how can you say there are not black people clothes and then say that you see white people wearing them? Wearing what? The very thing you say does not exist?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 08:21 PM
0

Bullshit there isn't.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 08:17 PM
1

So compare matching t-shirts or jeans or boots. I agree about the underwear though. Same problem here.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:33 AM
1

When was the last time you bought a woman clothes?
/r/MensRights04/12/14 12:10 PM
2

Women do not buy more clothing than men. They have broader options. Their clothes cost more so it seems like they buy more. OK, as an average women probably do buy more clothes than men, that is a fair point, but it is way out of proportion with what I see in target and other department stores.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 09:19 AM
-1

There really is no response I can make that won't get down-voted.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 09:16 AM
0

Ok then, here is some more SRS bullshit for you. Target now caters mostly to white people and only has black people clothes in the back. But that is not racist to cater one particular group over anther in a private store.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:34 AM
17

If you want proof of the misandry, or if not misandry then, femalecentric reality of Target Australia, you only need walk into a store anywhere in OZ to see two thirds of the display floors are taken up with women's clothing or accessories. Less than a quarter is for menswear.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 06:50 PM
1

It's not like we don't have EB games in OZ. I think we'll be fine.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 06:46 PM
0

Fuck Target. They are just over-priced Kmart.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 06:45 PM
1

That is why she needs to be punched.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:32 PM
2

and child rapers too.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:23 AM
2

This comment from the article made me want to seek out this woman and punch her. So sad.That man that she was with has serious issues, you get her pregnant then leave her to deal with it all, no wonder she did that. Poor woman, but she should of contacted people for help not kill everyone. She was mental and hormonal thats what happens when you Dont treat a woman how she is suppose to be treated.Shit happens
/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:21 AM
1

That is so funny I forgot to laugh.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:45 PM
2

Hey OP, by saying Femisogynists did you mean misandrists or did you mean women who hate women?
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:21 PM
1

I don't know. Why don't you scan the news headlines for the last fifty years and get back to me?
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:41 PM
0

The article is not biased. The OP says it is. That is the problem.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 01:05 AM
-2

OP you are wrong and reading too much from this. They say an "alleged false rape accusation." At no point does this article say anything about her being an alleged rape victim but in the title. And guess what? She was an alleged rape victim. She alleged to have been raped, perhaps falsely but she did make the allegation so the title is accurate. You just invented that. This article is not biased.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 09:44 PM
-1

More like "How to be the gay friend."
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:19 PM
-1

Because it fits with the normal level of why we hate feminism crap that usually gets posted on this sub. If the mods have no problem with it, why is what you think valid?
/r/MensRights07/11/14 10:35 AM
-2

Just a disclaimer Clem ford is an Australian, so when she say's don't vote liberal, she is not talking about voting for liberal politicians. She is talking about the Liberal party in Australia which is extremely conservative and retarded. Just saying
/r/MensRights07/11/14 09:38 AM
0

Amazing, for all your equality garb, you produce an article that "teaches" men how to pick up women. If someone else had written this article you would condemn them for portraying the ideal that relationships occur when a man wants to pick up and not that there actually may be some attraction from a woman to a man - stranger things have happened. Furthermore how is voting liberal a measure of a mans respect for his girlfriend/wife/daughters etc. What you write ridiculous throw away lines like th…
/r/MensRights07/11/14 09:35 AM
-1

I just feel like she copied and pasted some of the text from somewhere else. It seems very familiar to me. I was thinking plagiarism.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 09:31 AM
-1

Make me. And she doesn't hate men, she just like hitting men. There is a difference.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 08:45 AM
-2

Just wondering if anyone else recognizes certain passages from this article. I think I have read it before in some form or at least parts of it verbatim. This is Clem Ford again and the article is dated today. I am sure I have seen some of the text before.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 08:22 AM
1

Me.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:19 AM
-4

Look in the formatting help to learn how to post a link that is not a mile long.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 09:21 PM
3

Ha!
/r/MensRights02/11/14 12:51 PM
1

You sound much like him.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 12:50 PM
2

My mistake. Still. It needs exposure, so no harm done.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:19 AM
9

The byline says: By cracked staff. Way to keep your misandry anonymous.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 09:03 PM
1

Oh, wake up.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:12 AM
2

Someone puts a gun in your face, you have a choice too. Do what they say or get shot. It is a choice.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 09:18 PM
5

AS opposed to the open wound look of a vagina
/r/MensRights13/10/14 09:17 PM
0

This is matriarchy
/r/MensRights13/10/14 09:15 PM
6

See how many of the procedures pictured were being performed by women?
/r/MensRights13/10/14 09:14 PM
5

That linked to a post that has no relevance to this argument. Stay on topic or pay closer attention to what the topic is.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 12:38 PM
11

The cop should have been providing tips to the woman on not accusing random men of being pedophiles and thereby...escalating the situation. The responsibility to make peace was not on the man. It was his responsibility to stand up and say "fuck off!" Condemning the cop giving such advice makes you the problem It makes the cop the problem and still you for trying to make this alright. Stop being an apologist. The woman was wrong and the cop was wrong. When you know what is right, you don't get to…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 10:53 AM
2

way to quote Rand. Not many people can find much use for her words today.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 09:34 AM
23

No, he should stand up to it and to people like you who accept it and are a part of the problem. It is vital that we as men resist such bullshit every time and everywhere. Wrong is wrong and screw convenience.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 09:28 AM
1

No, she needs to go fuck herself and so do those mall cops.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 09:25 AM
0

a satirical deconstruction
/r/MensRights09/10/14 01:35 AM
16

I am not stating anything. I just posted someone else's satirical video.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 09:43 PM
13

Yeah, and?
/r/MensRights08/10/14 09:16 PM
2

http://np.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/2hrhuu/serious_men_of_reddit_what_things_happen_to_you/
/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:09 AM
1

control of the patriarchy
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:43 PM
-1

...Said the guy who is still going.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 12:07 AM
-1

blither Blather, genius. And cool story bro.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 11:50 PM
1

cool story bro
/r/MensRights27/09/14 10:35 PM
1

Indeed it is. You're a great demonstration of this. Ohh! flipped it. How very sophisticated of you. Must have taken all of ten hours to think that one up. I didn't make an argument you cretin. I know. Have you ever heard of OBVIOUS SARCASM? That's what it looks like. FYI. I'm not so optimistic about that Because you still don't understand when someone is using sarcasm. You are not smart enough to follow a simple exchange and get it right, so why would you expect me to give two and a half fucks a…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 11:41 AM
-1

Still throwing a tanty? Said the child who cant make a point or comment without insulting and then bitching like a three year old about getting insulted back. Predictable that you project YOUR childish behaviour onto me and call it my tanty. You are too laughable and pathetic to be angry with. I want to give you a sweet and pat you on the head like an adorable snot faced toddler.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 11:37 AM
-1

You picked the fight douchenozzle. Not me. Then blame me for responding to your insult. The words are written right there above you. If you don't like being insulted, don't insult people. Most children can figure this out. Beyond your abilities I guess.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 05:32 AM
-1

Yeah, like i am soooo concerned what you think of my intellect. Find something better to do with your time than start unnecessary punch-ups, fool. Aww, you said exactly what I wanted to say. Dickhead, you called me stupid and then claim I am starting a punch up? Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 02:35 AM
2

Sophistication is hard to come by these days. What a well rounded argument you just made. I hope to be as smart and wise as you some day.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:03 PM
1

It is common usage. my clarification was so you didn't think I was insulting you.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 07:53 PM
0

Don't be patronizing just because you have no argument to make. Speak like a grown up or shut up.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:44 PM
0

It is not a mistake. Language changes and you have not kept up with it. Common usage makes it legitimate. That is how language works. Your lack of understanding is ripe. Learn about something before you repeat it. I bet you get pissed off when you hear Americans say erb instead of herb, and when people don't use an before a noun that starts with an H. You are a grammar Nazi without the knowledge needed to be any good at it. Sorry pal, but I am a professional writer with a degree in communication…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:42 PM
0

Or, on the other hand, the one holding onto with reality, yep. Language does not conform to your needs. It is dynamic and defined by common usage. Your usage is UNcommon. You just imagined it was. You don't get to make up rules for slang words that, by definition, don't have rules of usage. Just recognize that words get used in ways you find uncomfortable because of your invented preconceptions of how things should be, and learn to deal. This whole argument is a load of wank and you know it.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 11:48 AM
-4

If you think this pile of shit is intelligent content then there is no hope for you
/r/MensRights26/09/14 11:44 AM
1

Yes it is fine. A wank is a self indulgent splooge. Using wank as a derogatory noun is saying it is just some mental splooge or a verbal splooge. The grammar is fine. let it go. If it doesn't make sense to you, then the problem is not with the usage of the word, the problem is with your ability to understand.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 09:04 AM
1

It is called hyperbole. And it is not over the line. I am clearly not advocating it.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:53 AM
-4

And I feel it needs to be pointed out and stomped on when this minor tabloid-level crap gets posted. We need to try to be better than that, or we only become what feminists stereotype us as: Little whiny men with no real issues to talk about.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:41 AM
3

Australian guy wondering why you don't see it as a proper use? Wank is a noun, verb, and adjective. In this context it is the same as saying a total load of shit. Being British doesn't give you expertise on the English language, usage and style. And we Aussies use the word more than Brits do now days. It is ours now. Mwuhahahaha!
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:36 AM
-6

Gettin real
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:28 AM
3

In Australia it is five years before defacto status.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:27 AM
1

yes, he could
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:26 AM
3

If you ever wonder why SOME women end up dumped in a shallow forest grave...
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:26 AM
-2

Message to the OP: This post is a total wank. And you should know better. There are real things to be outraged at and real issues to deal with. this is absurdity masquerading as validity. Post something useful or stay quite and let the grown-ups speak.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 08:06 AM
4

He is trying to get laid.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 10:51 PM
2

he laughably unironic idolization of Tyler Durden and the adoption of the old-fashioned “rugged” fedora, with approximately the style of a drunk chimpanzee, says about as much The noose
/r/MensRights25/09/14 10:34 PM
2

the comments on the article tore it apart.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:13 AM
2

tl;dr Whiny subscriber is whiny
/r/MensRights03/09/14 09:51 PM
0

Yeah, I almost fell into that trap during the argument.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:43 AM
9

I do not encourage you to cheat on you boyfriends. But if you do decide to do that, here are a couple of handy tips that will help you do that without getting in trouble. She actually wrote this. I do not encourage you to cheat, but I really do, and here is how you can do it.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 12:49 AM
0

oh. sorry
/r/MensRights03/09/14 12:26 AM
1

I did not need to be reminded.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 11:22 PM
1

Oh, boo!
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:22 PM
1

don't think of them as human beings Sure, if he cheats, get rid of him and move on. he owes this both nothing. Alimony is supposed to be for supporting one partner who cannot support themselves. Usually because of children in the home. This woman admits to earning 60k p/y She does not need more money and she wants the house as well.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 11:31 PM
0

tl;dr Blonde Tina Fey says something stupid. Hmm, did anyone not see that coming?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 10:36 PM
0

No, we don't. None of that is happening here.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:48 AM
0

fuck this self hating apologist.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:47 AM
1

How about, Teach women that most men are not rapists.?
/r/MensRights27/08/14 11:37 PM
0

Don't waste your time and energy showing this for the shit it is. It is some fat girl bitching in a text. fuck her and move on. Don't give her bullshit any weight.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 11:33 PM
2

It is a joke; laugh at it or ignore it. Don't go looking for something to complain about.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 06:01 AM
1

Oh, ok Mr defense attorney. Your witness then.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 08:47 PM
0

they still give it to men.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:10 AM
1

she posted a response letter in pastebin
/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:10 AM
7

we also see it from his actions and tweets and her responses and a whole bunch of other things that maybe you are not aware of or are ignoring.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:08 AM
9

seems like the witch hunting is going on at anyone who wants to discuss the issue of this woman.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:06 AM
4

Every SINGLE point she makes is based on something from at least 50 years ago. So fucking what if women had it bad in the 60's. We fucking know this. It was years before most women alive today were born. It does not exist any more. No example she gave meant anything and it was all decades old nonsense with no relevance to today. The reality of how little choice women had only a century ago is nevertheless absent in contemporary manifestations of anti-feminism, such as “Women Against Feminism.” I…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 01:55 AM
0

I cannot argue with you. Logic has no effect on you. I'm outie
/r/MensRights18/08/14 05:05 AM
1

Yeah, I like that
/r/MensRights18/08/14 05:04 AM
0

'Women weren't subjugated and kept in the home so men could keep them down?! Preposterous!' I don't believe that. I just think the guy I have been arguing with os a twat who thinks that misogyny never happened. Hatred of women is overt and subtle. Keeping women in roles we establish for them is a form of disrespect, mild hatred, and fear of losing power. That fear breeds hatred and disrespect. and has done throughout human history. BY the way. Apologies I am sorry for ripping into you before. Do…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:49 AM
0

It's one possible result, yes. The argument, though, is whether or not women's gender role was a form of subjugation, and if it was, whether or not that was due to misogyny Yes. so if it was, though we disagree, subjugation, then it has to be by misogyny. It is perfect logic. Subjugation is born of hatred, Hatred of women is misogyny. subjugation of women is misogyny. QED my cunt friend. There is no escaping it. The argument here is whether or not women were subjugated, and it is not open for de…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:41 AM
-1

I have some beliefs that I have examined and considered and it doesn't matter where they come from. Being an MRA does not make me right in every MRA standpoint I have. I have an open mind and I SEE the arguments and points of women. Sometimes they are right. Sometimes we are right. The arrogance you have to tell me to ponder this some more is flamboyant. I have lived in this world as a man for 40 years. I have lived with and grown up with women and girls and I am educated and literate. I can mak…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:30 AM
0

subjugation is a result of hatred Einstein. SO yo think it comes about because of love? Just my opinion, but if you consider yourself an MRA, I think you're a pretty shitty one. I might not be the arbiter of who is a "good MRA" or "bad MRA", but I have a right to my opinion. My opinion is that you are a cunt who doesn't know much. I might be wrong, but I have a right to an opinion. You did not address how many women died(or were brutalized and intimidated) while fighting for their right to vote …
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:22 AM
-1

It's ridiculous to think, as feminists claim, that the majority of men have exercised hatred of women throughout history. He implies I am a feminist by attacking my argument as a feminist claim. FYI I am a hetro man, absolutely NOT feminist, and an MRA. That is the very definition of relevant. The rest was a return of insult to him. How does it feel to be so completely wrong?
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:14 AM
-1

Misogyny is not specifically just hatred of women, it is a subjugation of women. The keeping them in the home was part of it. It forced them into roles that men chose for them. They lacked choice and freedoms because of what you term compassion. Tell me, How many women suffragettes dies protesting against your male compassion? That's a stupid, revisionist view of history That is a meaningless phrase spoken most often by people who never bothered to finish a degree but still think they can convin…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:11 AM
-9

yes.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 07:43 AM
-7

Yes, that, and suspicion of men. But not this: It was empathy not misogyny that kept women from having careers. Total bullshit
/r/MensRights16/08/14 11:02 PM
-2

not with the vid recording it
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:28 PM
-21

He doesn't need to fight back or hit her to defend himself here.this is just a girl being a cunt. He could subdue her or at least use his strength to get her off of him. he filmed it this way so he could make a statement. He is right to make the statement, but his is set up.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 03:32 AM
1

Classic feminazi tactic. Not sophisticated. Kinda obvious and only idiots are taken in by such things. Like I said, not sophisticated.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:48 AM
1

feminazi's are not that sophisticated. You are over thinking this.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:36 AM
4

If your enemy leaves ammunition lying around, use it. That is smart.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:18 AM
2

Now we know how to effectively shut down any feminist or anti male FB page we want. Thanks, feminist at sea.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:17 AM
1

Everyone knows men with short hair are naturally rebellious and over-opinionated. We don’t want that, we want men who are easily controlled. I couldn't make it past this. first two sentences.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 11:23 PM
2

Doubling down nc863id? I think you need to learn the meaning of that phrase. He admits that there is a bias and then goes on to explain his perspective of that bias. Correctly as well. There is no part of his argument and counter points where he is doubling down on any position. This implies that he is blinded to facts and sticks to his position in the face of overwhelming evidence, like a cop who realizes he has screwed up in full view of the public. All he did was agree a little and disagree a…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 05:42 AM
2

That is the most honest discussion of three misogynists. Nothing more. I don't think and act that way.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:43 AM
2

Criticism of the WAF movement be feminists is the Matriarchy in action.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:37 AM
2

the creator
/r/MensRights30/07/14 12:56 PM
1

This is an relatively unbiased story about discrimination. Some news agencies are getting it right. The report also found when it came to discrimination, it did not make a difference whether the boss was female or male. Very telling facts. Also; What we do know is that men's workforce participation rate is about 12 per cent above women's,
/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:29 AM
1

prawns!
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:39 PM
4

whatever the fuck that is supposed to mean.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 01:39 AM
4

They don't say Hooah in the Australian Army. That is a US thing. Unless you were actually misspelling whore!
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:43 PM
8

Jaque Lambie is a bogan troll who got elected. From her wiki page: Lambie enlisted in the Australian Army in 1989,[3] spending over ten years specialising in transport management and military policing.[4] She achieved the rank of corporal but at one point was charged and reduced in rank after assaulting a fellow soldier while intoxicated. This is who she is.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 07:13 PM
2

Women can't consent...didn't you know?
/r/MensRights16/07/14 10:09 PM
1

Put it in the side bar: If you got banned from /r/feminism, join the fucking club! That is their default position so don't bitch about it!
/r/MensRights16/07/14 04:27 AM
1

The entire shop was covered in large pictures of confident and attractive thirty-something women and one man, who was a handsome, middle-aged, grey haired man in a lab coat with a reassuring and completely non-threatening smile. My question can be extended to that as well. How much gender saturation do we accept and just ignore? If we are about equality in rights and social identity, then what is our responsibility in this? We can't just say "Because Feminism!", that is childish argument, and th…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 04:09 AM
1

It should count now. That is the point. If it matters when someone complains, then it matters to begin with. How we think is how we act. If we ignore this example, then we ignore its reality and its effect on us and women. The way we think matters.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 10:16 PM
16

This is an underlying issue that is never addressed and it is a fundamental way of seeing ourselves. I think it is a larger issue.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 10:14 PM
4

Cassandra Kennedy, from Longview, Washington, will not be charged as prosecutors fear it could stop others from reporting sexual assaults. How very feminist this argument is. There is not enough "Fuck that stupid fat-bitch-prosecutor" in the world to make this feel better.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 09:48 PM
1

And the "weak" argument come from the woman who keeps interrupting Carly as she tries to answer her bullshit
/r/MensRights08/07/14 02:59 AM
2

I assume that is sarcasm then.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 08:03 AM
1

cool story bro
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:18 AM
1

You still don't get it do you? I have every right to ask for a clarification on someone else's comment. Lots of questions are asked in /r/feminism and those users don't get banned. I got banned bcause while actually trying to learn and understand something about feminism, my ignorance showed in my question and exposed me as male. Then I get banned for having a cock. Nothing more. no breach of the rules or etiquette. That, is sexist hate. The epitome of paranoid misandry and you are defending it.…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 02:44 AM
1

How many times do you need to hear something before the information makes it into your grey matter? You are arguing against me doing something that I have said many times now, I never did. It is called reading comprehension. Try it sometime. Maybe before you respond. That would be good. When you are wrong, why can't you simply learn to shut the fuck up and BE wrong. I did nothing to violate anything written in their sidebar. <----------------------------------------------------------------------…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 11:17 PM
1

PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT I WRITE PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I asked a clarifying question about a comment on a post. Jesus H fucking Christ how hard is it for you to understand that? Someone commented on a post and I asked them what they meant? Doing so exposed me as male and I got banned. Why is this so difficult for you to get? I did not break the rules of that sub. How many fucking ways do you need to hear that before you comprehend it? For fuck sake learn to read before you argue.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 10:40 PM
1

/r/feminism is a hate group. It is retarded to avoid that fact and attack me for pointing it out. You didn't read what I wrote. I did nothing to argue against the narrative. I was asking a clarifying question and got banned for having dick, not for being one. That is a hate group, so stop supporting it. If we want to complain here then we will, because the people that desreve our complaints are wilfully and arrogantly deaf to them
/r/MensRights02/07/14 10:29 PM
1

No, /r/feminism is just a man hate group. The fact that any opinion that does not support the narrative of that sub gets a person banned or ridiculed is proof of that. It was not wrong to ask a question of someone who made a comment on a post. It is the norm for every other sub on reddit, so /r/feminism has no excuse for that kind of behaviour. I did not go there to ask a question, I went there to take part in a discussion and got banned for having the audacity to be a man. I didn't even questio…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 08:40 PM
5

So questions are not allowed in /r/feminism? Well of course not. Can't dare question the doctrine.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 01:20 PM
11

Well, first, sarcasm thick arguments will never convince anybody of anything. But it would not have mattered if you were respectful and charming. /r/feminism banned me for asking a question about something. I asked for clarification to better understand another comment and I got banned from commenting. They are mortally afraid of dissenting information. If ever there were a close-minded group...
/r/MensRights02/07/14 07:36 AM
2

That is a pro choice argument dude.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 09:24 AM
1

found on from the frontpage of /r/feminism
/r/MensRights24/06/14 07:49 AM
4

Notice all of the stats for ptsd and depression but all that mattered was the DV stat and it said involved in DV not the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:54 PM
9

Because a life is worth more in Australia I guess.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 07:31 PM
1

What if you aint an American
/r/MensRights18/06/14 06:08 AM
1

non-female of reptilian decent?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:54 AM
1

Lizard person!
/r/MensRights17/06/14 10:44 PM
0

Your title is misleading and you know it. They have yet to be charged because inquiries are ongoing. That does not mean they get to walk.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 11:29 PM
4

TIL Wil Wheaton is a pussy whipped twat burger who can't think for himself. I can just imagine his wife pissing poison into his ear about this shit.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:04 PM
1

That concept is beyond his ability to comprehend. His name says it better than I can.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:04 PM
0

story link? It sounds made up.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 11:52 PM
4

I wasn't talking about you, the OP. I was talking about the poster of the original text. No one can actually be that retarded so I assumed it was bullshit disguised as an opinion. I worded it poorly and gave you the impression that I meant you. I did not. I am sorry for being confusing.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 11:17 PM
6

So, who wrote this and where did it come from? I think this is a troll looking for upvotes.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 09:33 PM
2

What does a real woman do?
/r/MensRights22/02/14 08:17 PM
2

Title doesn't match the link
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:11 PM
3

Sounds made up. I'm calling bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 08:16 PM
1

LOL! "Legitimating"
/r/MensRights04/02/14 06:30 AM
2

Nah. "We perv at the beach", or on a bus, or whatever. It is a catchall term to describe looking at someone with sexual interest. then it can be also used in the pejorative. "That guy is a total perv!" But then why is a guy a perv but a woman doing the same thing is not?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:35 PM
3

This article gave me testicular cancer.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 10:51 PM
2

The grammar Nazi says (Man's needs an apostrophe. It is not 'mans') That being said. Welcome to the dark side. Take a seat, put your feet up.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 12:34 AM
1

Well it aint no fucking stimulant
/r/MensRights11/01/14 12:57 AM
1

Yes it is. Time to face your own demons I guess. Addiction can be to anything that allows you to escape or hide from responsibility and reality. It does not need to be a highly addictive substance. The mind is addicted more than the body ever can be. This is why people go back to their drug of choice, even meth and heroin, long after they have detoxed from it. They need to hide. It is a mental and emotional thing. And weed keeps people depressed.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:26 PM
2

Whose skirt was he trying to get up with this shit?
/r/MensRights22/11/13 10:20 PM
1

Skinny latte's and frappacinos would have to be involved in some fashion.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 10:37 PM
1

They wouldn't need to; men know what they want. They go in, fill their shopping lists and get out. Ten minutes max. Only women seem to have a biological imperative that causes them to fuck around in a store, even if they have a list.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 10:36 PM
1

Yeah, coz Cracked was always voraciously well researched and reported. Pity there is no way to type sarcastically.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:53 PM
0

This guy is obviously homophobic. Calling gay men queers is not the most offensive thing he could have written but he sure demonstrated his need for distance from them. As for the rest of the shit; I fart in your general direction.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:51 PM
1

I don't think you dated that girl to begin with. Calling bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 11:24 AM
2

could be. Could also be the other way. If you have a hard time believing it then tell me who you think should have been appointed instead of these men and why they are more qualified.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 11:14 AM
4

you just answered your own question.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 08:38 AM
16

People don't get elected into the ministry, they are appointed by the elected leader. And yes. There is only one woman good enough for the positions that were available. By good enough I meant better than every other minister at the specific field. The men chosen were chosen for there experience and ability to do their jobs well. They are better at it than the available women. Or so Tony Abbot thinks. I have no idea if this is true but this is his thinking.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 08:33 AM
2

fair enough
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:53 AM
-26

I think he is doing it himself and getting attention for it. I mean come on; Just look at the videos and tell me this guy is not an attention whore.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:35 AM
1

If I did read a book on language, which I have, then I would find out that language has rules and structure. When those rules are broken, what you say is wrong. Just saying it a lot does not make it right. If you had read a book on basic grammar you would know this but I guess it is too much to expect from you. Beowulf was not written in English so I don't know why you used that as an example. Middle English is not the origin of the English language, only one of them and more than a thousand yea…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 10:25 AM
0

no they are not. Maths is British, Australian, New Zealand. Math is North American. That is why there is a squiggly line underneath math when I type it. Because it is not an actual word even though millions of Americans say it. They also pronounce Herb as Erb for some occult reason but common usage does not make it right. It just makes a lot of people wrong.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 09:13 AM
-1

the AUS dollar is over 90 cents US so you really did your maths wrong. By the way, it is MATHS not math. If you live in Australia
/r/MensRights18/08/13 09:18 PM
1

or a good one
/r/MensRights18/08/13 09:16 PM
1

This one is quite good.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 09:16 PM
2

Why is this not in r/cringe?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 09:12 PM
1

What concrete facts do you have to suggests that it is truth? You get arrogant defending his story but it is just that, a story. He offers no proof. You don't know it is true but you are arguing for it so you believed it and you don't want to feel foolish for believing a lie so you argue with me. I said it was a lie because I believe it is. I have my reasons and my basis for it which I explained to the OP. Pay attention fool. So insults are the flavour of the day rather than an actual argument o…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 04:53 AM
0

well next time I come on this sub I will just make up some retarded sob story to get attention and all of the tards here will believe me. What is sad is that you accept bullshit without question and attack those that do question. I guess all fucktards sound the same to me so sorry mistaking you for the fucktard that preceded you.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 04:01 AM
-2

And you are dishonest. If you were telling the truth you would have ripped me apart by now for calling you a liar but your behaviour is inconsistent with someone who is wrongly accused of lying. You tell your story but offer no proof, which is very convenient for you I suppose. Most people who post stories have the good sense to prove their claims. So yes, you actually do have to prove yourself here.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:00 AM
-3

I was trying to but you commented and then commented again. You stay out of my comments and I will call bullshit whenever I see it so try harder next time. If you can clearly remember that night and the events from before and after and during with clarity then you could not possibly have been so wasted that you could not have fought back. You had the ability to search for you wallet and have a coherent conversation at the time so you would have been able to push her off or over power her but you…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 11:03 PM
-6

No, what I am saying is that you made up a story and posted it on here. You are lying and this story is bullshit. None of it happened. It was a fantasy from the start. That is what I am saying. Do you get it now?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 10:43 PM
-9

the fact that it reads like a teenagers fiction with you as the victim who can't control his situation. You are obviously lying. The rest of group just don't want to look at it.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 10:10 PM
-20

A well crafted fiction. You should submit it to playboy. This is a sub for men who don't make things up for attention.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:41 PM
2

You would need to provide proof of female rape cases too, I would think.(Links) Just offering an opinion will not be enough. You need to prove that there is a broader definition and give them unequivocal evidence. Even do I don't like your chances of getting anything to change here. I hope you do but reality is what it is. Try this and this this
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:47 AM
12

Websters do it tooAnd here
/r/MensRights02/08/13 11:27 PM
1

can you imagine if you did?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:04 AM
7

He should have yelled "Lying Cunt!" right back into her face.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:00 AM
3

They can also stand to wait in line like fucking grown ups.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:56 AM
4

If you post that on /r/feminism you will get banned. I tried something similar once. Just the truth in a little sign. The mods did not like the truth.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 10:06 PM
-8

Are you able to prove this? Your description sounds far less emotional than one would expect from a parent who has just lost a child. If it is true then I am sorry for your loss but can you prove it please? I don't want to call "troll" but this is not an opinion post, it is a story and you need to offer proof.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:54 PM
16

that is why I didn't post it there
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:23 PM
7

Wow guys. Some people need to learn how to laugh. It is a harmless joke. Enjoy it. I have seen a whole lot more anti female post on this sub. this is just good humor.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 10:24 AM
7

the Grammar police says that "male" is an adjective, not a noun.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:58 AM
3

Yeah, you and the rest of the internet community
/r/MensRights07/01/13 11:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter