TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dcb720 Archive

View 3 posts and 78 comments by dcb720 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

It's a dumb statement, sure Not if your goal is victory instead of truth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/21 12:04 AM
1

If I told Sally, “You’re using femlogic” then I would be acting like a sexist jerk invalidating her. It would be all on me. Sally didn’t do anything wrong. I would be the jackass. What if the result of her femlogic is to tell people not to get vaccinated? Then shes's doing something bad. Interesting how Sally gets a pass right away but a man doesn't and any men offended at a gendered slur have their feelings invalidated but you're just okay with that.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 12:26 AM
1

You don't have to care about condescending people but what about all the men who are hit by your gendered slur and don't deserve it? Or do think it'd be okay if I started using "femlogic" to descibe women making decisions based on fellings instead of facts? You don't see how such a phrase is just offensive in general even if it could genuinely apply to some?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 07:55 PM
1

Or maybe we just use "condescending" for both because inventing more gendered slurs only hurts people more than it helps. It alienates more potential allies than it attacks enemies. Plus "mansplain" implies a sexist motive. What if I explain things to both men and women because I am just generally pompous instead of sexist? No, it's just a jerky word to use.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:15 PM
10

I don’t understand how “mansplaining” is a problem phrase Imagine if when a woman reasoned incorrectly it was described as "femlogic." Bad, right? We don't need a gendered slur for that. We don't need to indict all women or imply it's a predominantly female trait. I get condescension from women fairly often, but I don't call it femsplaining because I'm not a sexist jerk.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 04:28 AM
2

Actual old fashioned women aren't on Tinder.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/06/21 01:34 AM
1

My dad was a pretty lousy dad. I, on the other hand, am an awesome one. But I don't want to be too self-serving!
/r/MensRights27/06/13 04:16 AM
2

Lots of peole think abortion is wrong without being fundamentalists. There are even feminist groups against abortion.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:02 PM
1

That's called the 2 wrongs make a right fallacy.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:36 PM
1

Legal != right
/r/MensRights13/06/13 06:35 AM
-3

My original statement applies to both sexes.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 06:23 AM
-12

Sex causes children. Just don't have sex. Or, just kill or abandon the baby. Whichever seems most reasonable.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 04:18 AM
1

Man, that sucks. I don't have any fixit advice but I feel for you. At least write to your kids often even if they don't get the letters until they're grown up more.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:01 AM
6

Because parents that don't parent is a bad thing.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:12 PM
2

He doesn't even call them. Maybe he isn't a deadbeat, as that phrase is related to financial matters, but he's no one I'd want to defend.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:47 PM
5

I think the same standards should apply, and I do think she should go to jail. I am not in favor of overturning consent laws.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 09:29 PM
2

I know a woman who has been with one loser guy after another. I don't think all guys are losers. Just her guys. I myself have seen a pattern in the women that have pursued me. They were all screwed up in similar ways. I ended up with a woman whom I had to pursue instead, and she is different. (Still screwed up, but in a different way.) At least they were all faithful. (Here come the replies of "you just didn't catch them.")
/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:23 AM
-3

Maybe there's nothing wrong with women as a class, but your ability to pick one is screwed up. Your conclusion (stay alone) would be the same, without being generalising about billions of people based on personal experience with a few. Edit: weird. I wrote this but thought I hit cancel instead of post.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 02:59 PM
4

Next you'll tell me people that preach tolerance are intolerant!
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:46 AM
0

I know catholics are against divorce, but do they insist people live together if there is violence? People can move out and remain married, but separated, and chaste.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:42 AM
1

How about we decriminalize it, but also decriminalize the father beating the tar out of the perpetrator?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 04:17 AM
2

Last week I spent 36 hours with my daughter. How can a man live with 6.5?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:40 AM
23

My wife isn't a feminist, but sometimes she makes comments about Mommies when she is able to do stuff for our daughter better than I am. I don't keep score about all the stuff that I do better than her though, so I asked to stop doing that, because it was offensive. Seriously, if she makes our daughter's hair all pretty, while I just do a boring ponytail, it's "That's why girls need mommies." But if our daughter wants to play in the mud, and only I will let her explore nature that way, I don't p…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:09 PM
1

This would seem like satire if I hadn't witnessed it happen before. It's a crazy world.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 09:28 PM
2

Indeed, they figure you must be lying, no one could possibly believe that, it's just your smokescreen for trying to control people! It's just so odd because the pro-life people I know don't have any problem seeing things from the other side, but pro-choice people can't even wrap their heads around the pro-life point of view and follow it logically. That should be a sign of pretty severe cognitive bias, but of course the same bias prevents people from noticing this.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 05:32 PM
1

Props to you for courageously stating your opinions. This group hates pro-lifers, perhaps because fewer babies = fewer men on the hook for child support = more men able to have indiscriminate sex, which is seen as a positive for men's rights... Men's rights has some screwed up ideas just like feminism does.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 05:27 PM
1

Okay, do it then.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 06:30 PM
1

My android phone doesn't display link URLs. I don't know the URL until after I click. If it was a pdf, it downloads the file. All I was saying is that the bot announcing the preceding link was a pdf actually had reasoning behind its existence. I too have a degree in computer science by the way. I just don't think its a trivial change to the UI to display URLs before visiting them on a phone.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:52 PM
1

I agree, but I also doubt either you or I know how to make them so.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:29 AM
3

The link works, but to people on mobile devices, it isn't clear it's a link to a pdf instead of a normal page.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:40 PM
2

"Oh, I get it. I just think it's evil."
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:22 PM
14

It was assault though.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 07:03 AM
2

I wonder what would have happened if she had simply asked for help.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:30 AM
-3

I don't know any fundies. Is using the biblical definition of things something only fundies do?
/r/MensRights15/09/12 09:14 PM
-4

Pro-life women are in the same boat.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 09:13 PM
-10

what needs to be done... is the law needs to give men rights to say if they want to be a father or not... That's called deciding whether or not to have sex.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 08:38 PM
29

Yes, that is wrong.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 08:36 PM
-2

Except murder is not defined as "intentional killing of something," legally or otherwise, except by you.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:12 PM
0

Because if I believe a fetus is a person, I should be in favor of killing him/her anyway, because it would benefit others? That is an utterly moronic argument to make. You do realize that there are people against abortion because they think it is immoral to kill a human organism? Or have you bought into the idea that all anti-abortionists just love to control women and their bodies? Because that's the kind of demonization of men I expect from feminists.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:11 PM
2

I could just be projecting. All the people I have ever heard say something like that, have said it in response to the idea that circumcision wasn't necessarily okay... they replied with it as though it was relevant, which of course, it isn't.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:31 PM
6

It's not that she has a preference. It's that the way people say that implies that their preference is a valid reason for circumcising baby boys without their consent. I'm sure there are many men who prefer partners with tattoos or genital piercings, for example. But if people started doing that to little girls, there would be a proper outcry. How about genital electrolysis as a baby? To make sure no pesky pubic hair ever grows there, since so many men these days prefer their partners shaved? So…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:25 PM
2

Why don't they move the child and not the adult? If it was me, I'd sure make a big deal about it. I'd be tempted to say, "Okay, but if I have to change seats, please make it next to an attractive single lady."
/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:58 PM
2

Prison officials responded, "We don't have a problem with rape."
/r/MensRights11/05/12 12:04 AM
2

It was the question I was responding to...
/r/MensRights07/05/12 02:46 AM
32

Here's what you do. Get yourself a backpack with cartoon characters on it, that match your child's gender. That is your diaper bag, snack bag, change of clothes bag, whatever. Next, constantly interact with your child, point at things and explain them to him. Play games with him. Show him affection. Focus on your child. Don't worry about people thinking bad thoughts. You won't even know if they are, because other people don't exist. You are with your child, who is your whole world. No one else m…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 08:07 AM
4

I have Tinker Bell shoelaces, T-shirts, backpack... and I collect the toys and other merchandise. I'm sure some people I know don't approve but no one says anything... I just have an aura of "I don't care what you think AND you'll get an earful if you so much as try.". I have gotten lots of compliments from women though. They seem to find it attractive that I am so confident in my masculinity that I can buck social expectations. (Of course, I am married so this does little for me.)
/r/MensRights05/05/12 06:22 AM
3

So what form of restitution is her repentance taking? Will she be financially compensating her father for the 9 years of his life she stole? Will she be writing essays or giving speeches on how false rape claims harm people? The government won't do anything to her. She waited long enough that they couldn't if they wanted to (which they don't...) If she imposes nothing on herself either... then you're right, she isn't trying to get away with her crimes, she ALREADY GOT AWAY with them. But that is…
/r/MensRights03/04/12 04:38 PM
0

Or something. Repentance is not about still trying to get away with one's crimes.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 04:23 PM
5

If she was 11, and she broke someone's kneecaps with a baseball bat, so that they never could walk again their entire lives, and got away with it, but finally confessed at age 30... the prosecutor could do nothing. Statute of limitations and she was a child at the time of the crime. I agree that society doesn't care about a man accused of rape. That is horrible. But it's not the ONLY thing at play here in the girl getting away with it.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 04:22 PM
1

Mens' rights, for me, has NOTHING to do with tearing down women.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 08:23 PM
4

Some men feel a real need for marriage. They'd rather get the benefits of marriage and take their chances on the downsides. That's not wrong of them, if not being married is sure to make them unhappy. The all-or-nothing approach may be good for you, but it's hardly a solution for many men.
/r/MensRights18/11/08 10:05 PM
5

I have no doubts about my own wife, so this isn't personal. But people have the same thoughts about pre-nups (if you don't trust her, why marry her?)... I think that's nonsensical. Obviously you have faith your wife will be faithful, but many things can happen 10, 20, 30 years later. The government used to protect everyone; they stopped doing that.
/r/MensRights18/11/08 10:03 PM
7

Many men have a desire for marriage, and just never getting married because the current laws are unfavourable is not a great solution. We should want to change the laws and perceptions. In addition, many marriages do work just fine and the wife never cheats or accuses the husband of wrongdoing. Why shouldn't a man want to marry, but also want to take whatever precautions he can (since we haven't yet changed the law back to being reasonable)?
/r/MensRights18/11/08 07:37 PM
2

Well do you have any ideas or should we all wring our hands continuously about how unfair it is?
/r/MensRights18/11/08 07:34 PM
2

Well with online banking I update all my accounts when I pay bills. So I'd sure notice if it decreased.
/r/MensRights18/11/08 07:20 PM
9

The Men's Rights reddit is full of stories of women falsely accusing their husbands of abuse or infidelity. In our society men are presumed guilty until proven innocent. Now when a man marries, he probably trusts his wife, and let's say that she starts out trustworthy. However, at some point this changes. Their relationship deteriorates, and the woman decides she doesn't love him any more and wants out. She makes up lies to get what she wants. Now, the existence of pre-nuptial agreements is a re…
/r/MensRights18/11/08 05:55 PM
4

So... where was he during all this? I'm not blaming the victim, it's her fault... but how did she do this for 2 years? Just like you shouldn't go walking alone in a bad neighborhood because of muggers (though muggers are to blame for their crimes), you shouldn't let your spouse have absolute control over the finances with no reporting or accountability.
/r/MensRights18/11/08 05:41 PM
1

I'm torn between curiosity about what you even think my sentiment is, and the desire not encourage more of your drivel. That people with your communication skills even exist makes me weep.
/r/MensRights04/11/08 04:55 PM
0

I am amazed that this sort of reply got upvotes. I don't care about people downvoting my post (I figure they must be idiots who didn't understand it), but upvoting this kind of keyboard diarrhea just boggles the mind.
/r/MensRights03/11/08 05:37 PM
2

That's a classic "two wrongs make a right" fallacy. For instance, women get off easy on murder sometimes, but I don't want to let murderers go to be more "fair." That's not being more fair, it's being more consistent -- and placing a higher value on consistency than on actual fairness. What we need to do is make sure women who commit heinous crimes are properly punished AS WELL, not make sure men get lighter sentences to make up for it.
/r/MensRights31/10/08 11:29 PM
2

I'm okay with that.
/r/MensRights31/10/08 09:42 PM
-1

I'm fine not to kill 'em, as long as we don't let 'em out, either.
/r/MensRights31/10/08 09:41 PM
0

I think you misunderstood both the submission title and my post.
/r/MensRights31/10/08 09:14 PM
0

10 years for 1st degree rape? That's ludicrous. I'm talking about the grab-someone-in-the-park or break-into-someones-house kind of rape, not the (still bad!) she-was-drunk-and-I-thought-she-wanted-it kind. People that will do that, one of the most heinous crimes imaginable, do not ever need to be in society again. Ever. We also need to crack down on prison rape. Even assuming everyone in prison is guilty and violent, I don't want anyone to be raped, even other rapists. I don't get how this can …
/r/MensRights31/10/08 09:12 PM
-2

What if those ten rapists commit more rapes? How many rapes does it take before it's better for the one innocent man to be imprisoned? Would you say "it is better for all rapists to escape punishment than for one innocent man to be imprisoned for a rape he did not commit"? Easy to do, just make rape legal. And murder while you're at it, and anything else where there exists even the possibility of a wrongful conviction... I believe we should punish people when their guilt has been established bey…
/r/MensRights31/10/08 07:04 PM
6

I read that whole article and it doesn't mention the most obvious thing of all: sex. Guys like breasts. They really, really do. Talking about breast cancer means corporations and advertisers can talk about breasts and cloak it in a medical context. That's why there will never be a product that donates to colon cancer. That doesn't interest people. Funding cancer research matters, but it's not fun, and advertisers wouldn't get a boost. Talking about breast cancer = talking about breasts, without …
/r/MensRights22/10/08 09:02 PM
1

How? Don't clubs already discriminate on who they let in? I don't go to clubs, but on tv they have a line of people waiting and a guy that allows them in or rejects them based on their attire and how cool they are... unattractive girls are not a protected classification legally, like discrimination based on race or sex, for example.
/r/MensRights01/10/08 03:52 PM
1

What does "red tees" mean?
/r/MensRights30/09/08 06:34 PM
1

I had no doubt. I understand the motive to do this. And likely many guys are fine with subsidizing women, because they want them in there. But let's look at the concept itself: Suppose you were going to the movies, and women got in for 1/2 price. Unfair, right? And you'd have a problem with it, because you just want to see a film and don't care how many women are in there. With a club, you want the women in there, and that desire overrides your offense at what is still the same fundamental unfai…
/r/MensRights30/09/08 04:19 PM
8

It's true, no one cares. Even I don't. My knee-jerk society-conditioned response goes something like this: men are supposed to be manly, and be able to take a bit of pain and adversity, and if you take the coward's way out, who needed you anyway? Not saying I actually think that, but that's pretty much what society conditions us to think.
/r/MensRights17/09/08 05:55 PM
4

At first I thought smbc stood for the webcomic Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal. Either way, the answer is no.
/r/MensRights08/09/08 11:35 PM
-9

Sperm donors are people who plan to abandon their children. It's certainly wrong to renege on an agreement to let them do it, but that doesn't mean I feel sorry for the donor. They shouldn't have entered into that agreement in the first place. And by the way, the "fixed that for you" thing people do here on reddit is incredibly obnoxious. No offense.
/r/MensRights12/08/08 06:09 PM
-9

I don't feel sorry for sperm donors. Just don't create children you don't plan on raising.
/r/MensRights12/08/08 03:34 PM
2

This is one of the most disgusting things I've ever heard of. I've met several members of the Winkler family and I feel so awful for the grandparents of those kids, forced to hand them over to their son's murderer. She shot her husband in the back with a shotgun. His last words were "Why?" She yanked out the phone so he couldn't call for help and left him to bleed to death. It turned out later she had screwed up the family finances. She then blamed it all on him. Even if everything she said was …
/r/MensRights06/08/08 06:36 PM
1

"physical abuse" sounds like he beat her. There is zero evidence that that happened. In fact most of what she said happened, only she said happened, and after she killed him.
/r/MensRights06/08/08 06:31 PM
1

All men should read this.
/r/MensRights18/07/08 12:00 AM
0

Preach it, brother!
/r/MensRights18/07/08 12:00 AM
4

I bet she wouldn't have had to serve time at all if she hadn't got caught lying about what happened. Ask Mary Winkler. She admitted shooting her husband in the back, but said he was kind of a pompous blowhard so that made it okay. She got a wrist slap and was turned loose.
/r/MensRights11/06/08 09:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter