TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dependency_injector Archive

View 6 posts and 1,569 comments by dependency_injector on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,569 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You mean, for not revealing they're trans?
/r/MensRights27/07/26 06:07 AM
1

"Buying a discounted item"
/r/MensRights27/07/26 06:05 AM
32

I guess, the women who "choose the bear" are cannibals?
/r/EverydayMisandry24/07/26 10:53 AM
87

Beastiality and cannibalism
/r/EverydayMisandry24/07/26 06:15 AM
10

She needs a place to keep others safe from her
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 07:25 AM
5

No, I'm taking about Jesus. There is also a fun theory that he and his mother were lizards, because lizards are most well known for asexual reproduction
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/26 04:42 AM
6

Hi. Im science and I never said that But the Bible says otherwise! Though I don't think it counts as women's asexual reproduction anyway since the child was male.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/26 04:30 AM
12

Isn't it wrong to use "men" and "females" in the same sentence?
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/26 06:51 PM
1

I disagree, the god of feminism is actually men (aka "the patriarchy"): It is responsible for creating the world as we know it. No matter how hard you try, you cannot destroy it. It can't be located or measured - but once you let it into your heart, you'll find its influence everywhere. It has some plan (to give men privileges over women), but more than often it acts like it's the opposite. Everything happens according to its will.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 07:06 AM
1

Sure, but that's not the part I disagree with. I disagree with the part where you said that sexist conscription is better than equal conscription.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 04:56 AM
1

Instead of "extending" it to women, you can just conscript the same number of people indiscriminately. I don't think the whole military of a country can adapt to twice as many conscripts very fast anyway. And if it could, more soldiers would mean stronger military, which means fewer victims.
/r/MensRights18/07/26 03:49 PM
1

Please correct me if I'm wrong. I get your position as "no conscription > sexist conscription > equal conscription", because you literally said Including women in it only make it worse. And I disagree with this, I would say "no conscription > equal conscription > sexist conscription"
/r/MensRights18/07/26 10:42 AM
1

Including women into conscription doesn't only make it worse, it makes it less sexist too.
/r/MensRights18/07/26 06:22 AM
7

In Israel, women serve in the army BUT they serve 2 years instead of 3, and they can't be forced into combat roles (they can choose to) I've also heard women serve in South Korea, but I'm not sure how it really works there
/r/MensRights16/07/26 03:44 PM
9

Women don't normally "give themselves up" to men, it's usually dating, partnership or marriage
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/26 02:19 PM
0

The differentiation is meaningless as no woman, feminist or not, cares about mens' issues or would help address this injustice I disagree, there are multiple examples of women who do that. Casey Jaye, Erin Pizzey, Karen Straughan.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 06:25 AM
5

I'm 60 kg and I downvoted
/r/MensRights15/07/26 06:06 AM
-2

The op is taking about feminists, not women
/r/MensRights15/07/26 05:18 AM
9

I don't see how expanding the problem to women can help us It would bring our society closer to gender equality, but I guess it's not something feminism cares about.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 05:16 AM
5

I grew up in Russia and I was taught by my mom to let women come through the door first. Except exiting the bus, when I am supposed to go first and offer her my hand to hold. Maybe I should feel bad about it, but it used to impress girls back in the day.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 05:31 PM
11

Of course not, you did it collectively with other people. You said "by us", not "by me"
/r/MensRights13/07/26 08:37 AM
14

it's the rules and expectation that have been set by us Why did you set those rules and expectations?
/r/MensRights13/07/26 05:09 AM
4

Being a woman isn't a disability. Parking spots for pregnant women make some sense though, they might need more space to fully open the door.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/07/26 03:09 PM
6

Check out Scandinavian countries, I think they look good in comparison to others
/r/MensRights10/07/26 09:04 PM
10

The phrase "men systemically rape" is wrong at least on two levels. First, it implies the existence of some "system of men", that has shared goals and acts as a whole, like a beehive - as opposed to considering every man a unique human that has his own goals and acts as an individual. Second, it implies the existence of "systemic rape", even though in any civilized society rape is rightfully considered a serious crime and is seriously punished.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 07:39 PM
3

In my experience, typically they wouldn't even agree to call a male victim "victim"
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/26 06:37 PM
3

Feminists always see rape the way the victim sees it. If the victim isn't male
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/26 03:59 PM
33

You dodged a bullet
/r/EverydayMisandry07/07/26 06:33 PM
7

They get into teaching because they want to be closer to minors
/r/MensRights05/07/26 03:28 PM
3

I was thinking about an attack on one's fertility
/r/MensRights05/07/26 06:41 AM
24

Same as I feel about mocking a woman for being punched in the stomach
/r/MensRights04/07/26 08:36 PM
11

I have some questions about this: If you read any feminist theory book written by a person with some basic qualification to write said book, you will never find phrases like "men are dangerous", "not all man but always a man", "I would choose the bear" written in it. First, can you provide an example of such book? Second, since feminists are different, they certainly have different opinions. The same author can be considered qualified to write a theory book by one feminist, and completely unqual…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 08:52 PM
6

more sexist and more likely to enforce traditional gender roles Being sexist towards women and enforcing traditional gender roles on women is literally, by definition, misogyny.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 08:22 PM
13

Double standards are bad, but double standards are good
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 04:38 AM
9

A white person is a descendant of (mostly) white people. They inherit from white people, they were raised by white people, like their parents and grandparents. It doesn't work the same with sexes, every man and woman is a descendant of 50% men and 50% women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 04:36 AM
15

I'm sorry it happened to you. Don't judge yourself, especially about something that wasn't your fault. It left scars, for sure, and you need a man that will help you take care of them.
/r/RedPillWomen24/06/26 11:39 AM
11

Comparing groups of people to wild animals is dehumanizing. It's generally considered evil, but if you're fine with feminism, you must be fine with making an exception.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 06:04 AM
5

The real show begins when you ask them for examples of regular, non-toxic masculinity
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/26 06:22 AM
10

Those are my thoughts. Yes, you are describing something that exist only in your head
/r/MensRights20/06/26 08:05 AM
7

Sure, this is one example: I don't doubt many women (and most men) would object to the idea of a "rapist being raped in prison", but that's a far cry from wanting to defend female rapists and denigrating male victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 07:13 AM
5

I respectfully disagree. Killing someone in self-defence is possible, unlike rape or torture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 07:11 AM
12

I guess MRA is a wider term, that includes LWMA as well.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 05:43 AM
5

No, I guess it means the same
/r/EverydayMisandry10/06/26 04:21 AM
11

I think you mean "victims of 80 percent of violent crime"
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/26 08:36 PM
29

In some countries, men have a right to lift heavier loads as a job. But it's more the employer's right to hire a man for such a job.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 12:50 PM
7

They didn't
/r/MensRights01/06/26 04:58 AM
60

Yes, in Ukraine
/r/MensRights01/06/26 04:50 AM
4

Everything anyone says before "but" can be ignored. That's literally what "but" means.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/26 09:13 AM
5

Then everyone who is tolerant to conscription/draft, is tolerant to misogyny
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/26 07:05 AM
3

They used to be in Ancient Greece
/r/EverydayMisandry23/05/26 06:20 AM
17

Being cautious based on lived experiences is also normal. Getting therapy to fix it is also normal
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:24 AM
19

Because having positive views of humans is normal human behavior
/r/MensRights21/05/26 05:02 AM
10

Whenever someone empties the garbage container next to your house, it's always a man. Not all men, but always a man
/r/EverydayMisandry18/05/26 04:41 AM
12

Because some of them want me dead and others don't see any issue in it
/r/EverydayMisandry14/05/26 06:21 PM
-2

No, I mean our society is basically built on Christian values
/r/EverydayMisandry13/05/26 07:22 PM
-1

Also democracy and Christianity
/r/EverydayMisandry13/05/26 09:24 AM
13

No, you also have to be a first class citizen, and your victim has to be a second class citizen
/r/MensRights13/05/26 02:23 AM
-4

I'm sympathetic towards cats and dogs, but I don't consider them equal to humans.
/r/MensRights04/05/26 04:25 AM
2

most feminist now-a-days dont hate men, demonize marriage, romance and family Also they don't have names, or don't call themselves feminists, or don't exist.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 03:07 PM
1

Pro: it's against violence. Con: it's not for everyone
/r/MensRights01/05/26 05:29 AM
11

The author is certainly either a feminist or an idiot
/r/EverydayMisandry27/04/26 07:41 PM
17

Erin Patria Margaret Pizzey CBE (/ˈpɪtsi/;[2] born 19 February 1939) is a British men's rights activist and novelist Isn't it ironic that an old school feminist is known as a men's rights activist?
/r/MensRights27/04/26 09:53 AM
22

In your opinion, who is the best example of an old school feminist helping men?
/r/MensRights27/04/26 04:02 AM
2

That's a great question. "Privileged treatment" implies there is some group that isn't treated equally to others, while "equal rights" implies there is no such group. That's exactly why the phrase "equal rights for women" is nonsense, just like "privileged treatment for everyone"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 12:49 PM
3

So when you wrote the core of feminism is equal rights and opportunity Was it your honest mistake to add for women after that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 11:12 AM
4

"Equal rights and opportunities for women" is nonsense. The rights and opportunities can't be equal if they aren't for everyone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 10:13 AM
1

You could say "you talk 99% about Ewoks or feminists" and that would be equally correct
/r/MensRights25/04/26 08:15 AM
1

That sounds suspiciously good. Are there any feminists like you who aren't anonymous?
/r/MensRights25/04/26 08:09 AM
2

That's egalitarianism, I guess
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:51 AM
4

It's not ok to tell a woman what she should be
/r/MensRights24/04/26 01:34 PM
18

There are 2 more words in the sub name
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 08:02 PM
7

Since he wasn't elected to speak for all men, this is what he should have said: I'm so done with myself just in general. I have so much to answer for, and I haven't even begun to address it. I (either at birth or as a child/teen/adult) need to submit a DNA sample, which is then kept in a registry. When a sexual assault takes place, any DNA evidence left behind can be directly tracked and identified, and charges be laid. I need to have a reversible vasectomy performed on myself once I become a te…
/r/MensRights19/04/26 06:25 AM
91

"The Patriarchy"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 05:40 PM
3

Because manicure is expensive
/r/MensRights30/03/26 11:01 AM
7

That would make sense if women were born from 2 female parents
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/26 06:45 AM
3

Ну да, конечно
/r/EverydayMisandry22/03/26 08:56 PM
4

That's why I only date married women. Well, a married woman. A woman married to me.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 08:26 PM
14

The patriarchy shat in our pants!
/r/MensRights13/03/26 06:34 AM
6

They are as correct as Russian TV when they say "Opposing putin is russophobia, extremism and terrorism"
/r/MensRights12/03/26 05:53 AM
2

Not necessarily though, opposing egalitarianism can also be misandry, transphobia, homophobia, racism etc.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 05:30 AM
0

Simple low-effort well-known semi-humorous tricks seem to work on them unexpectedly well
/r/MensRights03/03/26 08:47 PM
27

Comparing a train car women use to prevent assault to a train car white people use to prevent assault could be a good exercise for your mind
/r/MensRights01/03/26 10:08 PM
35

Sure, the seats in the back of the bus are equally comfortable and you get to the destination equally fast
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:41 PM
3

Option 1 is a small army and no slavery involved, option 2 is a big army of slaves taken by force
/r/MensRights17/02/26 07:18 PM
6

Not all Muslims but always a Muslim
/r/MensRights07/02/26 07:09 AM
16

Not gonna lie, I was expecting her to say "but" or "however" at some point - and I'm really glad she didn't
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/26 06:02 AM
8

I guess it really hurts feelings to be taken from your family and sent to die in a war
/r/MensRights27/01/26 05:38 PM
1

Many Russian conscripts are tortured until they sign the contract. There has even been a case when an officer executed a conscript who denied to sign, in front of other conscripts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 01:47 PM
1

I'm pretty sure many people have been put in prisons for SA. If the laws don't work, they all are actually innocent, right?
/r/EverydayMisandry26/01/26 04:30 PM
42

If that was true, and at the same time men were the "ruling class", why would there be laws protecting children from SA?
/r/EverydayMisandry26/01/26 07:36 AM
14

If I'm Jewish, should I date a Nazi?
/r/EverydayMisandry26/01/26 04:47 AM
9

Are you saying women are as fit to be CEOs as fish are fit to climb trees? I'm not at all a feminist, but that sounds really wrong.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 08:53 AM
1

there are some feminists out there who really are pro men and anti misandry When they say that, I ask for the names of the feminists they consider the most pro men and anti misandry
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/26 07:30 AM
9

If you just want to have fun, copy and paste her message, but replace "women" with "white people" and "men" with "black people"
/r/MensRights19/01/26 04:29 PM
18

Shame? Men put rapists in prison
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 02:13 PM
23

Isn't it basically MGTOW?
/r/MensRights13/01/26 05:58 PM
1

Psychologically identical people don't exist, everyone is unique
/r/MensRights11/01/26 06:57 AM
2

Disturbed - Reason to Fight
/r/MensRights11/01/26 06:14 AM
2

Same as with a woman in the same situation - it's none of my business. It doesn't mean I can't not want to marry them.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 10:49 AM
2

"The Red Pill" was made by Cassie Jaye. At large, feminists have a problem with that, MRAs don't.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 05:12 PM
8

Because otherwise they won't be able to blame me for actions of some man I never met
/r/EverydayMisandry06/01/26 01:56 PM
2

The idea of men being inherently violent is completely antithetical to most forms of feminism The "most forms of feminism" you're talking about is something like 5 people. And I'm being very optimistic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/25 06:37 AM
10

when a man says that he’s trying to make the conversation about him Ironically it's the opposite. By saying "all men" they have made the conversation about him. By saying "I've never done it", he is trying to make the conversation NOT about him.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 05:53 AM
12

And anyone who says "not all feminists" is only trying to shift the focus
/r/MensRights30/12/25 05:28 AM
95

I think the correct term is victimblaming.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 02:08 PM
16

How about all young men organize and collectively boycot conscription or go on a general strike? That's impossible because there is no such thing as "all young men" that can do something "collectively"
/r/MensRights28/12/25 12:32 PM
25

That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it. The Narcissist's Prayer (by Dayna Craig)
/r/EverydayMisandry24/12/25 06:03 AM
2

No, when they say "men as a group" or act like "men as a group" is a thing, it's obvious that they mean "all men"
/r/MensRights22/12/25 05:46 AM
5

Now I'm almost sure you are that girl. Not only you have tried to downplay her/your crime - now you got angry and defensive and wrote 3 paragraphs of insults, without actually addressing my theory.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 05:50 AM
1

I think I got it. You are the girl from the post.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 05:03 AM
10

I wonder how many times she said "I love men, they are so special" unironically
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 05:53 AM
3

a morally justified means to that goal As for me, this is enough to consider them evil by default, until proven otherwise. Variations of this line were used by pretty much every hate movement in history.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 10:04 AM
26

You mean Jews r/menKampf
/r/EverydayMisandry14/12/25 05:20 AM
3

Wholesome plot twist: they are married and work from home
/r/EverydayMisandry12/12/25 07:07 AM
5

I can answer the second question. She did it to make her list look longer.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/12/25 06:13 PM
28

That's what the post says, women are supposed to treat men just like men treat women. Of course they mean exclusion from military slavery, protection from genital mutilation, building shelters for victims of domestic violence etc... Right?
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/25 05:28 PM
28

Where do I sign up to the matriarchy? I do want to be free from conscription
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/25 02:49 PM
26

A beautiful feminist? Lol
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/25 06:09 AM
5

That's what I mean. Feminists don't really want to do anything about male only military - though it's an hierarchical structure of armed men, acting as one, doing physical labor and having guns. If feminists did care about "patriarchy" or "toxic masculinity", they would fight male-only conscription and draft because it "excludes women" from military service - but they don't.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 03:39 AM
-8

There is nothing more patriarchal or "toxically masculine" than the military. Turning away from draft and conscription is basically betrayal of everything feminists claim they stand for.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 07:06 PM
17

They don't want anything because they're dead
/r/MensRights02/12/25 06:59 PM
34

It implies 2 false things: Anyone who criticizes feminism feels emasculated The only possible source of manhood is oppressing women Your comment adds another false implication: The only possible reason anyone can disagree with this specific post is because they have a problem with "fighting oppressing women"
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/25 04:33 PM
6

Not being able to cook is a weird flex for anyone, man or woman. It's not rocket science, just following the instructions
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/25 05:37 AM
3

Both ideologies are designed to wage an eternal war against an unbeatable enemy (capitalism/patriarchy). Both promise that once they end the eternal war and beat their unbeatable enemy, everyone will live in heaven. Until they do (which is impossible by definition), their every immoral action can be justified by their noble goal.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 06:09 AM
1

If she decides to have an abortion, you need to provide support. "my choice - your consequences"
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:48 AM
1

Or simply your sperm, your consequences No, the "my choice" part is extremely important here. Without it someone could understand it as "Your sperm, your choice, your consequences", like your original comment
/r/MensRights12/11/25 08:51 AM
2

Then your original comment should be "Your sperm, my choice, your consequences"
/r/MensRights12/11/25 07:47 AM
1

No, I think the choice to give birth or to get an abortion should be made by the woman
/r/MensRights12/11/25 07:14 AM
0

Russia
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 12:52 PM
-4

My country will never fully recover from decades of socialism and marxism
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 12:00 PM
24

Let's hope no one gets touched by you
/r/MensRights08/11/25 02:33 PM
7

You can if the whole group is completely fine with being represented by extremists
/r/MensRights06/11/25 07:42 AM
24

Military slavery
/r/MensRights01/11/25 10:32 PM
48

I wonder if she would still complain if more women than men participated in the team
/r/MensRights29/10/25 05:45 AM
-6

I see. But the metaphor still means the same, right? Like, someone with big female balls is supposed to be brave and assertive, and someone with small female balls is supposed to be a whiny loser? I'm just asking to make sure I understand the metaphor correctly.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/25 11:19 AM
-16

Did you just associate having testicles with bravery? That's quite misogynistic.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/25 10:18 AM
72

She should have made it on her forehead for everyone's sake.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/25 07:09 AM
11

Next time they will read that when a woman is pregnant, the biological sex of the child is already determined
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/25 01:16 AM
6

Yes, exactly 2 people per pregnancy, no more, no less - provided it was consensual
/r/MensRights21/10/25 04:53 PM
4

No, I'm not specifying any gender, it works for both men and women equally: you make your choice about your body - and you get consequences
/r/MensRights21/10/25 04:47 PM
11

I don't see any contradictions, but honestly I'm not sure what you mean
/r/MensRights21/10/25 07:11 AM
17

No, I'm not saying that
/r/MensRights21/10/25 06:30 AM
75

Your body - your choice - your consequences
/r/MensRights21/10/25 05:25 AM
6

Men live longer Where?
/r/MensRights20/10/25 05:05 AM
23

Men are living longer Where?
/r/MensRights19/10/25 07:19 PM
3

As a married man I laugh when someone calls me incel. I mean, it's literally the opposite
/r/MensRights17/10/25 05:25 PM
11

Is "The Future Is White" racist?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/10/25 06:19 AM
2

Not all feminists are misandrists, I guess. There are also feminists who justify misandry, feminists who are fine with misandry, feminists who never expressed their opinion on misandry and of course, feminists who deny the existence of misandry.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 06:46 AM
3

Misandry and feminism are different So are People's Democratic Republic and totalitarian regime
/r/MensRights30/09/25 05:37 AM
4

"People's Democratic Republic" and "Totalitarian regime" are two different things. North Korea is a People's Democratic Republic, so it can't be a totalitarian regime. Right?
/r/MensRights27/09/25 03:36 AM
6

No, I meant that: Why the men in this group gotta be such pussies about so much shit?
/r/MensRights21/09/25 06:41 AM
6

You are a man in this group. A good therapist can help you understand the reason you are like that.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 05:26 AM
14

Anyone who refers to their child as "it" shouldn't be allowed anywhere near any children
/r/EverydayMisandry21/09/25 04:54 AM
15

It's just as funny as "You drive pretty well for a woman" or "You are quite educated for a black guy"
/r/MensRights21/09/25 04:49 AM
35

Feminism = misandry
/r/MensRights21/09/25 02:16 AM
1

Sommers was a second wave feminist Why did you say "was"? Did she stop calling herself a feminist? Because otherwise, here is what I think: Sommers said feminism was becoming a male hate movement Sommers keeps calling herself a feminist If both are true, it means that Sommers knowingly considers herself a member of a potentially male hate movement
/r/MensRights19/09/25 07:04 AM
1

No, feminists who defend men don't exist - at least there is no reason to think they exist. However, you can (try to) give me a reason to question my opinion by answering these questions: Who is Sommers, do they call themselves a feminist, and what is their greatest achievement in defending men in the last 5 years?
/r/MensRights19/09/25 05:19 AM
2

I know about feminism and feminists enough to not believe you without a proof. To prove that feminists who defend men exist, you can start with their names - then I'll ask you what they have achieved in the last 5 years to defend men, but first the names.
/r/MensRights19/09/25 04:39 AM
1

They don't exist
/r/MensRights18/09/25 08:39 PM
7

I can, except in that scenario he gets his tattoo against his will, and his participation in the society is limited
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/25 05:28 AM
12

Their only source is "it suddenly occurred to me"
/r/EverydayMisandry23/08/25 06:45 AM
14

If that's true, listening to her advice seems a bit irrational to me
/r/MensRights19/08/25 10:46 PM
7

In your opinion, what were the most effective actions taken by feminists in last 5 years in order to fix one of the following issues: Male genital mutilation (circumcision) Male-only military slavery (draft, conscription) False accusations of sexual crimes? Please provide this data: The names of the feminists involved Links to news articles about these exact actions, or at least to posts in their social media to prove the involvement of these exact feminists Measurable results of the actions
/r/MensRights19/08/25 11:12 AM
1

Doing what? Complaining and blaming women. You literally said you do it
/r/MensRights19/08/25 05:28 AM
1

We complain and blame women for these things Why do you keep doing it? Can't you just stop?
/r/MensRights18/08/25 05:16 PM
10

Maybe you are missing the point of feminism
/r/MensRights18/08/25 04:43 PM
66

Because according to feminism, women are naturally unable to make their own decisions, let alone take any responsibility
/r/MensRights18/08/25 01:59 PM
5

Sounds like prostitution
/r/MensRights18/08/25 08:46 AM
5

And with the cat that got adopted by a guy, the stress of being in a new home is probably part of it as well. This guy cats
/r/EverydayMisandry18/08/25 07:43 AM
1

What exactly do you mean? That she doesn't believe in women's social, political, and economic rights, especially (but not necessarily) with regard to equality of the sexes? Or that she argues that legal and social restrictions on females must not be removed in order to bring about equality of both sexes in all aspects of public and private life?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/08/25 06:21 AM
13

Then perhaps you can give even the slightest scrap of evidence for these people ever facing even a little backlash from other feminists over shit like this? I've never seen anything like that, personally. certainly never to these people's actual faces, I think the closest I've seen was some lukewarm statement like, "okay, so what she's saying isn't good or alright, but she's a victim of trauma who is clearly just venting! You can't call someone out for saying sexist shit while venting! Not if th…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/08/25 08:27 PM
3

I looked for "feminism definition" in DuckDuckGo, and got this: Belief in or advocacy of women's social, political, and economic rights, especially with regard to equality of the sexes. The movement organized around this belief. A social theory or political movement arguing that legal and social restrictions on females must be removed in order to bring about equality of both sexes in all aspects of public and private life. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition An…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/08/25 08:01 PM
1

Oh yeah when I meet with my male friends we only talk about our precious semen and masturbation
/r/EverydayMisandry16/08/25 02:56 PM
44

But they aren't real feminists! Real feminism is absolutely about equality! Real feminists call out these impostors all the time! You just see a vocal minority! Real feminists are the silent majority! They are so silent nobody even knows their names, but they are doing a lot of important work! It just goes unnoticed by literally everyone, including the real feminists themselves, because those stupid radicals get all the attention! /s
/r/EverydayMisandry16/08/25 01:27 PM
4

What did HIM) do to them?
/r/EverydayMisandry15/08/25 07:46 AM
2

I think it was misandryFreeFemAllies, but I'm not entirely sure. I'm entirely sure her name was Christina though
/r/EverydayMisandry15/08/25 06:11 AM
2

It may be interesting for a psychiatrist
/r/MensRights15/08/25 05:55 AM
-2

Why would anyone pierce their baby's ears? Their reasoning must be even more stupid than the reasoning of people who would mutilate their baby's genitals
/r/MensRights13/08/25 07:03 PM
6

Women don't know what to evaluate women only know how to be reactionary Misogyny is not allowed here
/r/MensRights10/08/25 05:04 AM
24

My wife told me that too
/r/MensRights09/08/25 04:29 AM
13

First time?
/r/MensRights07/08/25 08:17 PM
14

I would say "the idea of comparing certain groups of people to wild animals is completely evil"
/r/MensRights05/08/25 01:23 PM
8

Not all feminists hate men Of course not all of them, only the ones who have names and exist in the real world
/r/MensRights03/08/25 04:22 AM
4

Who also shouldn't be taken seriously: Anonymous feminists Feminists who don't openly call out misandrists Feminists who only call out misandrists "as a whole", without specifying their names Feminists who say "Radfem aren't real feminists" to anyone who doesn't call themselves a radical feminist Feminists who promote ignoring misandry or "not taking it seriously"
/r/MensRights01/08/25 05:06 AM
9

When they say "autistic men" they mean "CEOs of high tech companies"
/r/MensRights26/07/25 08:10 PM
13

Of course, I want to be sure my driver won't try to falsely accuse me
/r/MensRights23/07/25 06:31 PM
3

They can remain silent for any reason, however I think it's safe to assume any feminist agrees with the radical ones, unless proven otherwise. Publicly calling out specific radical feminists by name could be such proof. Calling out radical feminism as a whole cannot.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 04:45 PM
9

I'm pretty sure slavery isn't a requirement for safety, it's the opposite
/r/MensRights21/07/25 02:47 PM
9

Oh I thought you were equating radical islamists with gay Turkish men, like "They (radical islamists) don't think we (non-muslims) deserve same rights as them, so we (non-muslims) should not care about them (gay Turkish men unrelated to radical islamists)". Sorry, my bad.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 11:01 AM
-18

How many radical islamists are known to be gay?
/r/MensRights21/07/25 10:42 AM
-27

I don't think there is any significant overlap between gay men and radical islamists
/r/MensRights21/07/25 10:38 AM
101

They shouldn't. Forced military service shouldn't exist in the first place
/r/MensRights21/07/25 10:36 AM
4

The lack of criticism of radical feminism. According to a popular artificial intelligence: Fewer than 2–3% of well-known feminists explicitly critique radical feminists by name. Perhaps 10–15% critique radical feminist ideology without naming names. The rest — over 80% — remain silent or avoid open confrontation with radical feminism, even when they disagree with it privately or ideologically.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 09:10 AM
6

The phrase itself is not misandrist, but I would call it a red flag. The people who use it will often cherry pick jobs like CEOs or ministers, completely ignoring jobs like garbage truck drivers. Even though there are significantly more garbage truck drivers than ministers and CEOs combined, and "male domination" in garbage truck driving is much more serious. I mean no offense to garbage truck drivers (sorry if it's not the correct term). They totally rock, and our world would be a really horrib…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/07/25 08:44 PM
16

That interview is one of the best from Jordan Peterson. Also the interview with Cathy "Are you saying..?" Newman, it was hilarious
/r/EverydayMisandry19/07/25 07:06 AM
21

What do I need it for exactly? To be a person who has a right to decide how their body looks
/r/MensRights16/07/25 07:32 PM
25

It's quite reasonable to blame the people who made the decision to mutilate someone's body
/r/MensRights16/07/25 07:21 PM
8

Male oppressors deserve to be hated and if you’re not oppressing anyone you’re not being hated? It looks like you think that people who don't deserve to be hated are not being hated. If you don't think so, can you rephrase it to mean what you actually think?
/r/MensRights12/07/25 09:44 AM
1

Oh, you were being sarcastic, I see now
/r/MensRights05/07/25 12:39 PM
7

Of course, ultimately you cannot blame women for what modern feminism is today. You can only blame men that let this happen. Why do you think that OP blames women? I don't see anything like that in the post
/r/MensRights05/07/25 12:34 PM
15

I don't think men are into her
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/25 05:40 PM
1

Sorry for the confusion, I was being sarcastic
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/25 10:39 AM
1

Another possible explanation: everyone who says they are a kangaroo is either a bear in disguise, or a bear apologist
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/25 05:05 AM
6

Also, if an innocent man is jailed, he won't be there to save a woman from a rapist
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/25 09:19 PM
3

Radical feminist: "I hate men" "Good"/"real" feminist: "I don't hate men" "Moderate"/regular feminist: "I don't hate men, but I'm going to act like I do"
/r/MensRights01/07/25 05:53 AM
8

No, why would we? Millions of men and women in power (leaders), such as Catherine the Great are responsible for wars.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 01:47 PM
6

Leaders like Catherine The Great
/r/MensRights30/06/25 07:47 AM
0

I would say it's a form of homophobia, because it implies there is something wrong with being gay - or at least, it can be understood that way.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 07:01 AM
3

"Who set up that system" It pretty much covers every sentence in the prayer: Men don't experience X. And if they do, it's not as bad as women experiencing X. And if it is as bad, men have the power and support to deal with it. And if they don't, it's not women doing X to men. And if they do, it's just a natural response to "oppression".
/r/MensRights26/06/25 06:40 AM
26

lf you ask a feminist about their relation to men's issues, you will hear a remix of the Narcissist Prayer: That didn't happen. And if it did, it wasn't that bad. And if it was, that's not a big deal. And if it is, that's not my fault. And if it was, I didn't mean it. And if I did, you deserved it.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 05:58 AM
2

It's a choice a person... or a bear Not exactly, it's a choice between a "person with certain immutable characteristics" or a bear. Saying "people are animals" is fine by me, but not "black people/Jews/women/men are animals"
/r/MensRights19/06/25 05:45 AM
6

I think the correct response is something like: "Comparing certain groups of people to animals (or inanimate objects) is called dehumanizing, and it's considered immoral by many people including myself "
/r/MensRights19/06/25 05:05 AM
7

Some women being attracted to some men is a biological flaw. I mean their parents
/r/EverydayMisandry12/06/25 08:41 PM
5

Nah thanks I'm more of a Cartoon Network guy
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/25 12:30 PM
8

It could be an honest question. Maybe she is confused because her feelings contradict her moral principles
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/25 07:08 AM
4

I can only imagine them calling it differently like "oppression", "toxic masculinity", "male domination" etc.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 08:44 AM
11

Radical feminists are generally just feminists who believe in the feminist theory of patriarchy. Are there feminists who don't believe in the theory of patriarchy?
/r/MensRights07/06/25 07:08 AM
5

If they say "men and women should be equal by law, so..." - they are egalitarian If they say "men and women should be equal by law, but..." - they are feminist
/r/RedPillWomen05/06/25 05:49 AM
31

I don't see any difference
/r/MensRights29/05/25 06:42 AM
58

You did say the stereotype about men being violent was statistically true, it is right in the post
/r/MensRights29/05/25 04:14 AM
16

Genital mutilation. If it happens, the doctor should lose their license and go to prison. The parents should go to prison as well, and when they are out, they shouldn't be allowed anywhere near their victim. Conscription. It shouldn't exist at all, because it is literally slavery. The military should be professional and consensual. Financial abortion should be a thing
/r/MensRights29/05/25 03:36 AM
30

Their solution in the end? You mean, their Final Solution?
/r/EverydayMisandry27/05/25 05:26 AM
15

Like paranoia + narcissism?
/r/MensRights26/05/25 05:57 PM
26

Oh I have some options! Toxic masculinity. If men weren't so toxically masculine, she would care about male victims. The patriarchy hurts men too. Which means male victims are responsible for the abuse they suffered. A man or a boy can't be a victim of abuse. In this case, she intended to use "retribution", "justice" or "consequences", but forgot to change the word. /S
/r/EverydayMisandry26/05/25 07:00 AM
15

Men's issues are caused by "the patriarchy" Feminists don't want men's issues to be fixed So, feminists are basically on "the patriarchy's" side
/r/MensRights25/05/25 05:05 AM
15

If one hooded woman had not stabbed 16 people, they would not have been stabbed too
/r/MensRights24/05/25 05:11 AM
43

"The patriarchy" bans them to patronize women/s
/r/EverydayMisandry16/05/25 06:25 AM
5

Regular feminists say they pursue equal rights as well. I am looking for something that an egalitarian feminist might do, but a regular one would consider it misogyny or anti-feminism. Here are some examples. Let's say an MRA group is planning to protest male genital mutilation. A regular feminist would never do any of these: Publicly spread the information about the event in a positive way. For example, repost the information about the protest time and location from the MRA group in a social ne…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 07:32 AM
5

I don't see how their actions are different from the actions of regular feminists. What makes them egalitarian?
/r/MensRights13/05/25 05:25 AM
7

Can you tell something more concrete about egalitarian feminists? What are the names of the most famous, most influential or your favorite ones? What do you think are their greatest achievements? Not something abstract like "fighting" or "advocating", I mean actions that were planned, executed and had some measurable results.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:37 AM
7

Do you know who wrote this? it was entirely men's fault that only men get conscripted
/r/MensRights12/05/25 05:07 AM
11

Serious allegations were made, which I successfully defended against It can (and will) be understood as "I did it but avoided the punishment"
/r/MensRights09/05/25 04:33 AM
13

you should listen carefully to anyone who says they are a victim. Unless they say they are a victim of false allegations?
/r/MensRights09/05/25 04:18 AM
1

This post has a link to a video of a woman complaining about exactly that
/r/MensRights08/05/25 03:42 AM
13

She can get as many "creeps" to boost her confidence on OF, and they will even pay her for it. But then it will be consensual for her and safe for the men, which I guess isn't what she wants.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 08:24 AM
1

Yes, because "patriarchy" is technically a God
/r/MensRights07/05/25 04:37 AM
1

How can something be both liberal and pro-fem? In liberalism, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. In feminism, there is only one opinion, and anyone who doesn't agree with it is a public enemy.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 05:56 AM
4

I disagree! Every man is born by a man and a woman (biologically). So, saying "who set that system up" is more like blaming a kid who is half German and half Jewish for WW2. And the person who blames the kid is also half German and half Jewish.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 09:40 AM
4

Ironically, the downvotes prove your point, you mentioned studies favouring men and the reaction was indeed negative
/r/EverydayMisandry03/05/25 04:42 PM
4

Agree, otherwise there is a high risk to end up saying something like "Male-only conscription is a result of misogyny, so to stop it we need to kneecap men"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/25 09:05 AM
5

In theory, it can be anything. In practice, it always means each and every man
/r/EverydayMisandry30/04/25 06:58 PM
3

So... should she be something special or follow the template?
/r/EverydayMisandry30/04/25 03:12 PM
3

Sorry I think I wasn't clear, I had no intention to call Casey Jaye a horrible person. She is honest, open minded, she can acknowledge her own mistakes and she is really committed to her goals, it's enough for me to say she has a good personality. Good people like her sometimes call themselves feminists - I don't judge, it's their choice - but I guess effectively their beliefs are better described as egalitarian.
/r/MensRights30/04/25 09:46 AM
8

Cassie Jaye stopped calling herself a feminist when she made the film, I think. Erin Pizzey can be another example
/r/MensRights30/04/25 04:50 AM
10

Not impressed, try being more creative
/r/MensRights29/04/25 08:42 PM
20

If there were at least some feminists who aren't horrible people, everyone in this sub would know their names
/r/MensRights29/04/25 08:28 PM
9

Yes, I was raised and educated by a woman, and she intentionally did a terrible job
/r/EverydayMisandry29/04/25 04:59 PM
12

Wasn't 4b all about not having a bf or a husband?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/04/25 05:09 AM
3

Not sure about girls, but wives must certainly do
/r/EverydayMisandry27/04/25 04:38 PM
6

This is really unexpected
/r/EverydayMisandry24/04/25 03:39 PM
9

It's short for TwoXtraChromosomes
/r/EverydayMisandry23/04/25 05:20 PM
5

As I said, If they agree for a moment that men can be victims too, without saying "but" afterwards, their whole world will collapse. And here is an example: anyone can be a victim, but
/r/MensRights21/04/25 04:25 AM
11

Because feminism is based on the assumption that men are always violent and women are always victims. If they agree for a moment that men can be victims too, without saying "but" afterwards, their whole world will collapse.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 04:31 PM
6

From a certain point of view, it can be 100% because every trans person has experienced living both as a man and as a woman, just in different order.
/r/MensRights19/04/25 05:08 AM
6

countries in past If it's in past, it doesn't exist
/r/MensRights18/04/25 11:13 AM
13

You don't understand, it's different! /s
/r/MensRights17/04/25 08:20 PM
15

Sounds like victim blaming
/r/MensRights17/04/25 12:00 PM
8

The same pattern exists in Russian propaganda. "We defeated the Nazis back in 1945, which means now everyone we fight against is a Nazi"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/25 02:33 PM
1

"Rapists don't get punished", it means everyone who has been punished for rape is actually innocent
/r/EverydayMisandry15/04/25 06:09 AM
13

Why couldn't they look at someone else's crotch, their own crotch, or - that might sound a bit wild - not look at anyone's crotch at all?
/r/MensRights12/04/25 07:32 PM
72

I hope he will enjoy his "male privilege"
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/25 03:55 PM
22

When I saw the picture I thought it was kinda sweet, but then I saw the comments
/r/EverydayMisandry06/04/25 06:59 PM
2

I have an example. "The Patriarchy" expects women to show more skin because it values women only as sexual objects and wants to stare at their cleavage. At the same time, "the patriarchy" expects women to dress modestly - because it values women only as sexual objects and wants to stare at their cleavage and blame the women for showing it. So, basically, any choice of clothes is at the same time: Free choice of any woman Result of "patriarchal" brainwashing Empowering women Oppressing women Like…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 07:21 AM
2

Isn't the word "female" used correctly here? No doubt it's wrong to use "female" as a noun instead of "woman", but in this case it describes an opinion, not a person.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/25 07:22 AM
46

That's one of the rules of feminism: any number can be rounded up to 100% or down to 0%, depending on the point they are trying to make. If 95% of violent people are men, it gets rounded to 100% If 95% of victims of violence are men, it gets rounded to 0%
/r/MensRights30/03/25 07:00 PM
35

So, another person was a victim of a different illegal safety, not the false accuser?
/r/MensRights27/03/25 04:57 PM
46

What makes you think she was a victim?
/r/MensRights27/03/25 04:52 PM
3

You shouldn't apologize for the actions of other people just because they share some characteristics with you
/r/MensRights25/03/25 09:32 AM
6

It's more than there are humans on Earth
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/25 06:15 PM
9

If it's misogyny, why don't feminists do anything about it? The military is a hierarchical structure where the vast majority of members are men, and it openly excludes women. Is there anything more "patriarchal" than that? Do they actually fight misogyny and "patriarchy"? Looks to me that they just invent excuses not to.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/25 03:40 PM
8

Or like Russian women sending their sons and husbands to fight in a war without a goal for money
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/25 03:21 PM
6

Then he shouldn't extend his personal experiences and feelings on all men
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/25 01:44 PM
11

Basically, if she says it's ok to call me a potential rapist and I agree - I confirm that I'm a potential rapist. If I disagree - I'm raging because I can't comprehend the truth, which also confirms I'm a potential rapist.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/25 11:57 AM
9

It makes sense if they eat snakes
/r/MensRights23/03/25 08:20 PM
4

It is a bad definition. The first point implies connection between masculinity, antifeminism and misogyny. The other two points are too vague and subjective because anything can be "associated" with anything.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 11:42 AM
2

Some characters are meant to be ugly
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/25 09:03 PM
1

There is so much wrong with it. First of all, comparing groups of people to wild animals is straight evil. However, even if every second man was a maniac, the choice would be between certain death and 50% chance to survive - so choosing the bear is obviously not an optimal choice. And having said that, claiming that most women would choose the bear is basically saying "most women can't make an optimal choice in a hypothetical situation", which I would call quite sexist.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/25 02:51 PM
12

I think it's funny that it means "the patriarchy" will be happy with your choice of clothes no matter how modest or revealing it is. Which is one of the things feminists (supposedly) want
/r/MensRights18/03/25 09:21 AM
7

Isn't it both? I get it as both "men don't know how to wash clothes" and "women are supposed to do housekeeping" I would say the same about a car manual that explains how to change a wheel and says in the end "Or call your boyfriend, he knows what to do"
/r/EverydayMisandry18/03/25 06:41 AM
24

Feminists are divided on this issue Not necessarily! Just yesterday I saw this: Showing skin and covering skin are both patriarchal expectations
/r/MensRights18/03/25 06:34 AM
1

They are being really disrespectful to victims of actual rape by comparing it to "being manipulated into having sex"
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/25 11:09 PM
1

If we only focus on these groups, it's diluting the effort against actual systematic problems for men. Sure, let's focus on the non-hateful groups and their efforts against "actual" men's problems. Oh wait, they don't exist
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/25 06:26 PM
4

"A hole is a hole" could be the phrase that helped her lose virginity
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/25 05:49 PM
3

Male genital mutilation (usually called circumcision), military slavery (usually called conscription)
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/25 06:34 AM
11

Comparing certain groups of people to animals is a bad thing in the first place
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/25 09:55 AM
11

"I want men and women to be equal" That's not exactly the phrase feminists say. Instead they say "I want men and women to be equal, BUT..."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 06:35 AM
1

It's sarcasm, right?
/r/MensRights12/03/25 05:30 AM
6

Almost 96 000 men died fighting a criminal war. You don't see it everywhere.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 04:08 PM
6

Why would anyone try to farm karma in this sub?
/r/MensRights04/03/25 08:55 PM
3

"Hopefully if that ever happens, it happens in a mental hospital in a room with soft walls"
/r/EverydayMisandry01/03/25 05:53 AM
5

Nothing is more systemic than law. And the law in modern western countries often allows enslaving specifically men (conscription) and mutilating specifically male genitals.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/02/25 09:08 PM
1

<image>
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/25 06:32 AM
1

I'm not a feminist so I don't tell men or women how to choose their partners
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/25 08:45 PM
5

Sometimes they do, but it sounds like "I'm sorry you are so fragile, I didn't know I had to babysit you"
/r/MensRights15/02/25 09:39 PM
21

The first comment implies at least 2 things: Women pregnant with boys should be put in prison until they give birth. After they give birth, their child should be taken from them.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/02/25 07:53 AM
14

That's March 8, International Women's Day
/r/MensRights14/02/25 08:05 AM
15

It basically means "You are a bad woman because I disagree with your opinion - and I disagree with your opinion because you are a bad woman". Looks misogynistic to me.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 09:24 AM
6

Women in the IDF do get special treatment though. Female conscripts serve 2 years instead of 3, and it's easier for a woman to legally dodge the conscription.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 08:04 AM
12

If you have to be on guard 24/7, you should take it up with your therapist
/r/EverydayMisandry08/02/25 09:25 PM
10

Sarcasm: You see, she didn't get basic education because of the patriarchy. You just don't realize your male privilege of knowing that men and women are in fact the same species.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/02/25 08:42 AM
13

Egalitarian is a word
/r/MensRights06/02/25 08:56 AM
3

Maybe they were thinking about prisons, not hotels?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/02/25 06:36 PM
4

If the first picture is POV, does it mean she is on her knees?
/r/MensRights03/02/25 08:24 AM
29

Erin Pizzey, she was also banned from the women's shelter she started
/r/EverydayMisandry03/02/25 08:22 AM
12

She is missing the point. Basically all her questions are like "Oh you're saying the Sun is real? How can you explain the fact that I see the Moon almost every night?"
/r/EverydayMisandry23/01/25 04:05 PM
18

It crashed because the driver was applauding her
/r/EverydayMisandry21/01/25 05:21 PM
47

r/MenKampf
/r/EverydayMisandry21/01/25 03:09 PM
8

If feminists had anything to do with gender equality, they wouldn't reinforce and spread gender stereotypes, like "women don't hurt men"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/25 02:31 PM
16

In most countries it is completely legal to mutilate newborn boy's genitals and have a party about it. Attempting the same with a newborn girl will result in a prison sentence.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 08:50 AM
4

Because they want men to have the right to have emotions And how do you know they aren't lying about it?
/r/MensRights19/01/25 05:13 AM
6

For example, some intersectional feminists believe "patriarchy" hurts men too and deserve help They say it, how do you know they aren't lying?
/r/MensRights19/01/25 05:04 AM
8

Would they defend, let's say, Margarita Simonyan? For those who don't know, she is one of the most influential Russian propagandists, the head of "Russia Today".
/r/EverydayMisandry18/01/25 01:39 PM
1

it is believe all women. to me it's believe victims You have sexually abused me. It means, I'm a victim. Do you believe me?
/r/MensRights18/01/25 07:40 AM
1

it's not believe all women, it's believe all victims It's literally "believe all women", why would you lie about such an obvious thing?
/r/MensRights18/01/25 07:20 AM
1

If it was 1000x more likely, and 1/1000000 of cases resulted in arrests - it would still contradict the presumption of innocence
/r/MensRights18/01/25 06:44 AM
1

The "Believe all women" thing that breaks the principle of presumption of innocence for men only. There are also no men's or women's issues caused by "the patriarchy", because "the patriarchy" doesn't exist
/r/MensRights18/01/25 06:25 AM
3

Communists in the USSR opposed sexism in a way. They referred to men and women by a gender-neutral word "comrade" (товарищ). They also had men-only conscription, and gay men were outlawed, but that's the best example I can think of. And they are where they belong - in history books.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 07:36 AM
2

So, 5 names of real feminists, that's really a lot. Susan B Anthony (who wasn't a feminist at all, according to Wikipedia), Amy Peohler, Tina Fey, Liz Plank, Jane Fonda. I'm going to read about the other 4, can you recommend looking into something specific about each of them? What did they say or do that made you say "now this is real feminism, a fake feminist would never say or do it"?
/r/MensRights16/01/25 10:11 PM
2

Wow, that's interesting! Can you give me a couple of names of those "real feminists"? I'll look them up and see if they are indeed real
/r/MensRights16/01/25 08:57 PM
56

There are examples of feminists causing additional issues for men, and actively opposing solving the existing issues. (see r/ToxicFeminismIsToxic) If all men's issues are caused by "the patriarchy", and some of them are caused by feminism, should we consider feminism a part of "the patriarchy"? I bet their next point will be "but but they aren't real feminists". In this case I always ask them for names of the "real" feminists so I can look them up and see how wrong I was. Of course I have never …
/r/MensRights16/01/25 07:58 AM
37

Removing newborn's fingernails is worse than removing their toenails. Does it mean removing newborn's toenails should be allowed?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/25 06:21 AM
123

Male college enrollment drops - misogyny! Male college enrollment grows - misogyny! Male college enrollment doesn't change - misogyny!
/r/EverydayMisandry13/01/25 12:15 PM
1

So, there is no data about female on male rape because we don't need it. And we don't need it because the data we have doesn't include the data about female on male rape. Perfect feminist logic.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/01/25 07:49 AM
114

Conscripted men should be counted as slaves
/r/MensRights12/01/25 04:05 PM
2

LED aesthetics are badass and manly as fuck. Exactly! I guess most people who mod cars and build PCs are men, and LEDs are widely used in both
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 07:16 AM
6

Erection, or any other sign of arousal doesn't mean consent. Erection can happen randomly, it can be caused by some medications or by touching the man's erogenous zones - with or without his consent. It's not as easy for women to rape as it is for men to rape It's much easier for women to get away with rape. If there's boys out here upset they were sexually assaulted, break up with her and find someone who's better Don't you think the predator should be put in prison?
/r/MensRights12/01/25 06:42 AM
6

So on average, compared to male students, female students are 10% more likely to have sex without asking their partner for verbal consent
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:07 PM
39

I don't get it, what is "feminine" about this room? And even if there is something feminine, why is it a bad thing?
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/25 04:59 PM
8

"That's why if I walk at night and see a woman walking in front of me, I cross the road. I don't want to get pepper sprayed or shot by a mentally unstable person who thinks I'm a danger. Of course, mentally stable women exist too, but I'm not taking any chances."
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/25 09:38 AM
4

To make sure they exist in the real world, not just in your imagination
/r/EverydayMisandry06/01/25 06:25 AM
6

Why won't you give their names? Are they hiding from regular feminists?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/01/25 02:44 PM
9

Women are completely fine. I would consider a feminist-free community though.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:39 AM
10

Can you give a specific example? I mean, full names I can look up to see how chill they are
/r/EverydayMisandry05/01/25 07:01 AM
6

Do chill feminists have names?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/01/25 06:34 AM
3

Для того, чтобы писать на своём родном языке?
/r/MensRights04/01/25 12:45 PM
4

Women are the majority of voters, it looks reasonable to focus on them
/r/EverydayMisandry04/01/25 06:37 AM
19

Нет, я здесь один
/r/MensRights04/01/25 06:32 AM
6

The "majority" doesn't speak up against extremism. I thought it means there is also a "minority" that does speak up. If it was true, it wouldn't be a problem to give at least some examples. I guess what he actually meant is "the minority of feminists are extremists, and the majority doesn't do anything about them"
/r/MensRights02/01/25 10:09 PM
6

The majority is silent with this stuff Does it mean there is some minority of feminists who do speak against extremist practices in feminism? If that minority exists, this sub should know their names.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 09:48 PM
7

For a feminist, man = predator, woman = victim. So, when a feminist says We should treat victims better than we treat predators, it practically means We should treat women better than we treat men. Anything that contradicts man = predator or woman = victim. "Not all men" contradicts the man = predator part. A feminist can formally agree with "not all men", but they will actively refuse to actually take it into consideration. Because if they do, We should treat victims better than we treat predat…
/r/MensRights30/12/24 01:20 PM
6

She just assumes why people commit suicide because the victims can't tell it for themselves
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/24 04:15 AM
2

We work to dismantle the toxic gender stereotypes we have engrained in us. I can't not ask, what do feminists do to dismantle the stereotype about men being rapists?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/24 06:27 AM
1

Yes, and the government of Chechnya was involved
/r/MensRights08/12/24 08:55 AM
1

About that homosexuals are being hunted by gangs. By the government, but in Russia it's really hard to tell the difference
/r/MensRights08/12/24 08:46 AM
1

What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights07/12/24 09:05 PM
59

It's sexual aggression to flirt with someone who doesn't like you
/r/MensRights06/12/24 09:07 PM
4

He should be banned from teaching. I won't be surprised if the reason he wants to shame boys so hard is rooted in some sort of fetish
/r/MensRights04/12/24 06:35 AM
11

Yes, we don't choose our genders, but we choose what we say and what we do.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 03:22 PM
6

r/MenKampf
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/24 08:36 AM
1

He knows better what he's at fault of
/r/EverydayMisandry25/11/24 04:11 PM
13

Just ask him what he thinks about "man vs bear". If he says it's rational to choose a bear over him, he is dangerous. Otherwise, he is safe.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/11/24 05:42 AM
24

<image>
/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/24 04:41 PM
20

Does it mean that after 90 days she will be allowed near children again?
/r/MensRights19/11/24 06:49 AM
34

You can see a lot of this already happening in Russia. Most men who join the army are working men. Some of them go voluntarily for money and loot. Some are drafted because they don't have enough money to leave the country or bribe the officer. Not to mention that some go because they believe propaganda. As a result, the number of issues with plumbing, transport, garbage collection, heating and other "male-dominated areas" grows every day.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 11:59 AM
13

She should move to Russia
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 08:44 PM
16

When it comes to anything more real than comments on Reddit, "toxic masculinity", "patriarchy", "rape culture", "male domination" and a bunch of other feminist buzzwords suddenly mean the same - "all men". I remember seeing a feminist article that was captioned like "Feminists don't hate men, but if we did, we would behave exactly the same". Like, the same actions they explain by fighting "toxic masculinity", can be also explained by hating men. And the only way to know what someone's intentions…
/r/MensRights15/11/24 06:04 PM
11

There is something wrong with invading another country. There is something wrong with killing other people. There is something wrong with committing war crimes. That's not what you said earlier, let me remind you: He could have fled the country. He could have hid in the country. He could have fled from his unit and surrendered. He could have surrendered at the earliest opportunity.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/11/24 08:00 AM
9

There are always options. He could have fled the country. He could have hid in the country. He could have fled from his unit and surrendered. He could have surrendered at the earliest opportunity. I think you said you didn't want to victim blame earlier? There are always options. She could have taken another route. She could have dressed modestly. She could have learned self-defense. She could carry a gun.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/11/24 07:23 AM
9

Whatever he did to avoid being drafted worked, until that girl was disgusted by his height
/r/EverydayMisandry14/11/24 06:53 AM
10

Like not being so disgustingly short?
/r/EverydayMisandry14/11/24 06:24 AM
11

What happens if he doesn't "go to Ukraine", but "gets sent to Ukraine by force because some girl snitched on him"?
/r/EverydayMisandry14/11/24 05:31 AM
7

Feminists would be fighting themselves if they tried to abolish men's gender roles such as rapists, murderers and dictators
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/24 03:52 PM
4

It can be easily confirmed if your opponent provides this data (with evidence) What are the names of the people or organizations responsible for ending the draft? Have those people and organizations claimed they were feminists? Have they actually ended the draft, or do men still have to be registered?
/r/MensRights13/11/24 06:38 AM
3

Prison, that's what will happen
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/24 05:51 AM
1

Your body, your choice, your responsibility
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/24 03:33 PM
43

In democracies, most people who "let men control countries" are women
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/24 05:37 PM
73

"Rejects the idea that men are intrinsically emotionless, violent or sexist" "To believe that men can change" Does it make sense to them?
/r/EverydayMisandry24/10/24 03:50 PM
53

1 - Do you believe if yours views on men’s rights were achieved, women and men would be happier? Egalitarian men and women would be happier, others probably wouldn't. 2 - Do you believe in feminism, and do you understand the different “types” of feminism? I am sure feminism exists, there is no need to "believe" in it. The types of feminism I understand are: Radical, they openly say they hate men and act accordingly. Regular, they say they don't hate men but act like they do. Real, they say they …
/r/MensRights13/10/24 04:42 AM
5

Because if they stop thinking that, they won't be able to justify misandry
/r/MensRights08/10/24 05:28 AM
38

No need to worry, the money won't reach any civilians, men or women. All the money will be taken by what's left of ham-ass
/r/MensRights06/10/24 05:26 AM
3

Then I think he is enjoying it
/r/MensRights29/09/24 07:15 AM
1

Nah I think she is enjoying it
/r/MensRights29/09/24 05:08 AM
17

I haven't yet heard about anything feminists did that made the lives of men less miserable. So, they are either useless or lying about fighting for men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 09:28 AM
7

Feminists' world is built on an axiom that men are a monolith, a hive mind - and obviously an evil one. Every man is the same, he is programmed to behave in a certain way, and at the same time he can change not only his own programming, but also the programming of every other man in the world. The programming tells collective men to brainwash individual women to behave in certain ways. The reason is extremely valuable "male privilege". Valuable enough to sacrifice some part of collective men to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/24 08:57 AM
10

"Women are as capable as men", but at the same time "Women require special assistance" "Gender stereotypes are wrong", but "Men are rapists and oppressors"
/r/MensRights20/09/24 05:43 AM
10

Check their sources. How many authors from the list are related to men's rights? I skimmed it, and I am almost sure the answer is 0. And if that's true, what exactly were they researching?
/r/MensRights18/09/24 04:18 PM
9

the woman has decided to be a single mother just because the guy didn't want the baby. Next time keep your vagina in your pants.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 08:05 AM
17

Part of being a big boy is understanding sex has the potential to create a child Is it also a part of being a big girl?
/r/MensRights18/09/24 05:50 AM
16

she doesn't want the baby she has to go through an abortion which is mentaly and physically hard. Or not have sex so in both choices women are automatically accountable for their decision If the decision is to have sex
/r/MensRights18/09/24 05:36 AM
11

it makes sense to knee cap men to prevent them from impregnating half the town and ...knee cap women to prevent them from getting pregnant... leaving behind 85% of the new generation to become criminals. Without that addition it looks like you lied when you wrote this: Both should be held accountable
/r/MensRights18/09/24 05:34 AM
5

It is a loaded term. It implies that the only reason for the imbalance is related to "males" and their implied natural urge/desire/ability/etc to "dominate". A neutral term could be something like "gender-imbalanced" (not married to it), so it only states the fact, not the reasons. When someone wants to fix one of those things, the difference is very important. The only and obvious way to fix something "male-dominated" is to disadvantage men until it is fixed. I can guess the logic here is backw…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/09/24 08:01 AM
3

You can't not be wrong if you say 3 different things that contradict each other. It is logically impossible
/r/EverydayMisandry17/09/24 06:45 AM
6

You wrote 3 comments, saying that you were: Trying to tell us guys that we shouldn't be like everyone else. Telling yourself how to speak and to process thoughts. Just sharing your opinion. Which one is true?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/09/24 06:02 AM
4

Of course you can, why did you choose to do it in a public place though?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/09/24 05:43 AM
11

We can use gender-neutral terms, like "physical jobs", "high risk positions", "high responsibility positions" or "positions with unlimited work hours".
/r/EverydayMisandry17/09/24 03:39 AM
1

Here is the mistake in their argument. They start with The one who laughs is a man The victim is a man And make a conclusion like this The victim is responsible for being laughed at I would ask them to explain the logic between those two and have fun. Their logic can only be consistent with an assumption like "all men are a hive mind", "all men can affect other men's decisions", "men are less human than women", "feminism was never about equality" etc. The fun part starts when they do whatever th…
/r/MensRights15/09/24 07:25 AM
9

I grew up without a father and my mother always favored my older sister. When I was 11, my 13 year old sister started acting weird, yelling at our mother and talking back. So, mother said "Ok, that's just her age, she can't control her emotions". For me hearing it was really scary. I realized I'm going to lose control over my emotions in a couple of years, but unlike my sister, I will be held fully responsible for it. It wasn't a guess, I had already known that I didn't deserve the same empathy …
/r/MensRights14/09/24 06:27 AM
16

Fun fact: a feminist would call such a person "amoral" too, but because of the "egalitarian" part
/r/EverydayMisandry12/09/24 12:25 PM
49

Technically if someone thinks both statements are true, they are egalitarian rape apologist
/r/EverydayMisandry12/09/24 05:09 AM
22

We do this horrible thing that hurts everyone - exist
/r/EverydayMisandry12/09/24 05:00 AM
3

All these words just mean "men". "I hate men so I fight men" sounds hateful, but "I hate rape culture so I fight patriarchy" sounds noble. That's the only reason these words exist.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 09:15 AM
9

Right, abusive mothers shouldn't be legally allowed anywhere around any kids
/r/MensRights09/09/24 09:11 AM
31

One day they will see men as people, but not today
/r/EverydayMisandry09/09/24 08:14 AM
-13

Men will fuck anything but also men hold impossible standards for women
/r/MensRights06/09/24 07:30 PM
21

Feminism has existed for more than 100 years. If feminism is "for men too", any feminist should be able to answer these questions: What are the names of feminists known for helping men? How are they related to feminism? What actions did they take to help men? What result did they expect from those actions? What was the actual result?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/24 10:03 AM
1

The same as "toxic masculinity" or "patriarchy" - something terrible in theory, men in practice
/r/MensRights05/09/24 07:28 AM
2

At some point, I think it was 2012, I got a letter from the government. It said that I must surrender myself to slavery or they will put me in prison - just because I'm male. To keep my freedom I had to spend a month in a mental hospital and bribe the conscription officer. Since then the situation has changed a lot - now military slavery has become much more dangerous and amoral, since it includes committing war crimes in Ukraine and being rightfully shot by their army for that. Fortunately, I l…
/r/MensRights05/09/24 05:44 AM
1

I know what you mean when you say practice. I'm just saying that their actions show that their intentions are noy as such. They make it very clear that they have no ill intent So we can agree that in theory "they have no ill intent", while in practice "I know what you mean" what confuses me is your reasoning and adamant framing of feminism as a hate group, when that is not at all what I have observed not participated in Well, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck - it…
/r/MensRights04/09/24 08:46 AM
2

Yes, that's exactly how dehumanization works. In theory (what they mean), feminists fight "patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity". In practice (what they do) they fight men.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 05:08 PM
3

Feminist literature is exactly the "theory" I was referring to
/r/MensRights03/09/24 01:52 PM
1

Oh I see, it is a misunderstanding. People are obviously different, and I don't mean we should try to "equalize" them. I guess it's called "equity", and it's an utopian idea. I mean, every person should have equal opportunities - and decide for themselves if and how they are going to use them.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 07:42 AM
4

That's in theory, in practice "patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity" mean "men". That's how dehumanization works.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 06:11 AM
1

I always thought that equality is basically the same "live and let live" - "exercise your rights without violating the rights of others"
/r/MensRights03/09/24 06:00 AM
24

Obi-Wan Kenobi
/r/MensRights29/08/24 03:39 PM
0

Why do you ask me? I didn't say anything like that
/r/MensRights29/08/24 04:20 AM
0

Yeah, how is any of this related to my words?
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:06 PM
0

Yes, if someone punched you in the face, they violated it
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:35 AM
1

What is the opposite of REAL feminism? Is it FAKE feminism, IMAGINARY feminism or INTEGER feminism?
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:25 AM
3

As a pastafarian, I believe that woman = person and man = person, so I'll change your questions a bit just to show how I understand them. 1: do you not think feminism is needed as a voice for the people in countries where they currently don’t have any rights, such as Afghanistan? If no what do you suggest to help these people? If I had a solution for this problem, I would get the Nobel prize for it. But I don't think a supremacy movement like feminism can help the problem. 2: do you feel upset o…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 03:10 PM
4

means giving women the same rights men have Too bad there is no right that men have and women don't
/r/MensRights27/08/24 11:42 AM
12

At the same time a 19 years old person is a "minor"
/r/MensRights27/08/24 08:18 AM
20

Why are women preferred to be gynaecologists? Huh, my wife prefers male gynecologists. According to her, they are more careful. I didn't think her opinion was unpopular until now.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 08:18 AM
11

not all men but poisoned m&ms Comparing certain groups of humans to animals or inanimate objects is called dehumanizing, and it can't be justified no matter how precise and neutral their statistics are.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 08:28 AM
63

They do! Once a feminist told me "Only 5% of rape accusations are false", I responded with something like "1 in 20 is still a high probability", and they said "Where did you get 1 in 20?"
/r/MensRights22/08/24 06:30 AM
24

Why does it sound familiar? Ах да, вспомнил. Ah yes, I remember
/r/MensRights19/08/24 02:02 PM
9

"... And if we don't want to separate people, we need to fight the patriarchy together, by separating people"
/r/MensRights14/08/24 08:05 AM
38

Logically it means that all her friends are imaginary
/r/EverydayMisandry11/08/24 11:06 AM
64

It's not a false statement for someone who doesn't perceive men as people
/r/MensRights11/08/24 05:48 AM
162

So everyone who expects men to be violent criminals, is a misogynist.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 08:17 AM
2

I'm honestly considering rebranding myself as a "gender equality activist" or something similar at this point I think it's called "egalitarian", and I think it's a good idea
/r/MensRights30/07/24 05:52 AM
3

There is a sub, r/ToxicFeminismIsToxic Every post includes the person's name, their relation to feminism and their toxic action.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 02:47 AM
2

Let me guess, is it the natural color of the material on the first picture?
/r/MensRights29/07/24 05:58 PM
4

True, but my point is - a feminist won't answer this question. They will tell you so much about their experience with misandry in feminism, but will refuse to mention even one name.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 06:13 PM
-1

"Can you tell me a name of a popular feminist that you consider a misandrist?"
/r/MensRights28/07/24 03:20 PM
6

Sure, some victims of MGM lose the ability to have sex at all, which means they can't get STDs
/r/MensRights28/07/24 05:23 AM
9

More realistic scenario: married men who have ED will be legally punished.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 11:06 AM
17

People used to say "not all Muslims but always a Muslim" about terrorists
/r/EverydayMisandry19/07/24 05:02 AM
8

Boners can also be caused by touching. One friend of mine gets them from sleeping naked. Another my friend takes ADHD pills that can cause priapism from time to time.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 06:51 AM
3

I wonder how the wife felt when her mother said that becoming a parent is "something not serious" to her
/r/MensRights16/07/24 07:04 AM
29

Many people get married when they are pretty young and don't have anything expensive enough to care about
/r/MensRights10/07/24 07:13 AM
55

They use words like "too many" and "enough" because the actual numbers would look pathetic.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/24 08:15 AM
8

And a man killed Hitler. Wait...
/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/24 05:50 AM
19

My sarcasm detector fails me again. The font, the glitter, the picture of a cat and butterflies - it's too stereotypical to be posted with a serious face
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/24 03:43 PM
4

Right. If I claim that the chess game was invented in 20th century, it can be falsified by evidence that it existed before 20th century. But then I can say "The evidence was planted by someone who is really good at hiding", which is a new claim that can't be falsified.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:43 AM
15

Conspiracy theory logic. If something can be explained by the conspiracy, it proves the existence of the conspiracy. If something contradicts the existence of the conspiracy, it proves that the conspiracy works hard to remain hidden. Also, either people who don't believe in the conspiracy knowingly work for it - or they are brainwashed to work for the conspiracy unknowingly. Which also proves its existence. The difference between a conspiracy theory and a scientific theory was described by Karl …
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:21 AM
0

Theoretically, no one should have to prove consent, it should work the other way around. Presumption of innocence exists for a reason. Unfortunately, feminism is incompatible with presumption of innocence and other liberal practices.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 04:51 AM
-6

No, it shouldn't be mandatory. But if the test wasn't done, the child's birth certificate should say "father is unknown".
/r/MensRights03/07/24 04:21 AM
7

Are those incels in the same room with you?
/r/MensRights02/07/24 03:45 AM
1

Exodus 7:3-4 But I will harden Pharaoh’s heart, and though I multiply my signs and wonders in Egypt, 4 he will not listen to you. Then I will lay my hand on Egypt and with mighty acts of judgment I will bring out my divisions, my people the Israelites.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/24 07:47 AM
18

God is a woman Since God created cancer, earthquakes and Hitler, isn't it misogyny?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/24 05:14 AM
197

Because he is dumb
/r/MensRights30/06/24 02:38 PM
1

I selected the most important words in most of their arguments. are probably skewed that might be true I can feel sure far less likely chances are. my odds relatively low much less will probably not be are mostly odds are chances are chances are typically relatively cheap chances are relatively small is usually called the ordinary language led primarily most major Most major chances are chances are chances are virtually all exist, but are rarer In general I probably suffer incredibly unlikely ge…
/r/MensRights30/06/24 07:18 AM
8

It is a dehumanizing term just like "toxic masculinity". Something misandrists tell themselves so they can sleep at night: "We aren't fighting men, we are fighting the patriarchy, it can't hurt innocent men. They don't understand it but they will thank us one day. We have to fight the patriarchy until they understand"
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/24 01:15 PM
17

Seeing women as weak and incapable of violence (or pretty much anything) is the base principle of feminism.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 01:00 PM
9

Cutting a leg is completely different from cutting an arm. Does it mean cutting legs is fine?
/r/MensRights19/06/24 05:29 AM
2

Honestly, even on social media, just saying stuff like « maybe we shouldn't do that » would be a high gesture in my opinion The best we can count on is victim blaming like "the patriarchy hurts men too, and the only way to fight it is hurting men until all of them die the patriarchy falls"
/r/MensRights18/06/24 01:30 PM
30

And if it wasn't, that's their own fault
/r/EverydayMisandry18/06/24 06:13 AM
3

The moment I'll see feminists calling out those who protest against men's shelters, or diminishing men's issues, I'll think about it. Publicly calling out the regular feminists (as opposed to the "real" ones), with names and examples of their crimes, no less.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 06:03 AM
4

Let me quote Karen Straughan: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just "no true Scotsman". That's delusiona…
/r/MensRights18/06/24 05:42 AM
25

I think it's called "correctional rape"
/r/EverydayMisandry18/06/24 05:30 AM
8

I know for a fact that at least one woman is literally my therapist. Checkmate.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/06/24 05:13 AM
0

If you get advances and you reject them, there's a chance that you will be accused of sexual harrasment. But if you accept them, you won't be accused of anything, right? ...right?
/r/MensRights16/06/24 07:26 AM
6

Because joining the military is not only killing but also being killed. That's against the plan.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 07:33 PM
7

Of course, you will get all the support from the "real" feminists, that's something around 0 people on your side. You will probably get death threats from the regular ones though.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 06:48 PM
2

You don't talk about the boxing gym
/r/MensRights13/06/24 05:01 AM
11

He weighed up the suffering that women go through due to society and compared it to the suffering that me and other men go through and found this number
/r/MensRights12/06/24 12:39 PM
3

Yes, exactly. If she decides she doesn't want to test her child, the child's birth certificate should say "Father: unknown" so no one would have to pay child support.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:56 AM
2

I mean, if the mother disagrees to test her child
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:38 AM
4

Obviously, the mother should be able to refuse to take the test. It should be interpreted as "the father is unknown" so her husband won't have to take any responsibility for a child that isn't his.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:02 AM
10

Right, it should be avoidable - but refusing to do the test should be interpreted as "the father is not the mother's husband". Like a driver is considered drunk when they refuse to be tested.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:32 AM
-20

Being able to develop a new human body inside your own body is a superpower, no less
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:00 AM
4

To any supremacy movement
/r/MensRights07/06/24 05:35 PM
8

"It was also black" - "That's irrelevant!"
/r/MensRights07/06/24 12:13 PM
6

Additionally, any man that thinks that choosing a bear over him is reasonable, knows exactly what he has done to deserve it. Otherwise it wouldn't be "reasonable". Another point, anyone who says that most women choose bears over men, is a misogynist, because they believe that most women are unable to think rationally.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 06:21 AM
20

I got a letter from the government. Basically it said: You are a man, so you must come to the conscription office and surrender yourself into slavery, or we will put you into prison. So I had to spend a couple of weeks in a mental hospital to prove that I'm not going to be a good slave.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/06/24 02:52 AM
9

Gay people and people with autism too
/r/EverydayMisandry03/06/24 04:53 PM
4

I never said I disagreed with OP, boom, mic drop. OP is saying that opposing the X from "so you're saying X" makes you sound like you defend X. "No, that's not what I'm saying" only points out the fact that you haven't said anything about X
/r/MensRights30/05/24 01:46 PM
4

Ukrainian prison might be safer and more comfortable than Russia. If he gets a Russian passport, they can draft him. If he continues to walk around with an Ukrainian passport, it's not much better.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 12:23 PM
271

Being her son would be a torture anyway
/r/MensRights30/05/24 12:14 PM
34

"No, I'm not saying that" is the right response to "So you're saying (something you never said)" Have you seen Jordan Peterson's interview to Cathy Newman? It is a great illustration for this.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 04:47 AM
20

Don't worry, friend, as a straight guy I will lower the standards from within the patriarchy so you could meet them and by and large you will mostly benefit from it as all of us do. At least I will raise the question on the next biannual patriarchy all-hands meeting.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/05/24 03:47 PM
6

It is literally written in laws, how can anything be more systemic than that?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/05/24 03:51 PM
14

Even if it was true, it is impossible to go from "by other men" to "by themselves" without doublethink.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 06:20 AM
6

According to the same book, gay people must be killed
/r/MensRights28/05/24 03:15 AM
5

Because feminism is a cult of masculinity. Gods Men built this world, Gods men rule it, and only Gods men can change it.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 06:42 AM
28

Yeah, next week they'll be installing penis-shaped drinking fountains
/r/MensRights23/05/24 08:26 AM
31

But then my patriarchy membership will be cancelled and I will lose my male privilege forever!
/r/MensRights23/05/24 08:06 AM
81

Now they have special seats in public transport for people with certain genetic traits. Great job.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 06:47 AM
4

Sounds like communism. Everyone has to play their role to pursue a noble goal. Refusing to "play the role" and sacrifice one's personality, health and life for the Noble Goal makes them a "public enemy". There is a catch though: a Noble Goal, be it communism, peak civilization or dismantling "the patriarchy" can only be pursued, never reached. Like in one of my favorite (anti)Soviet jokes: "Communism is right behind the horizon. And the horizon is an imaginary line that moves further from you as…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 06:07 AM
8

Why would we want to see systemic misandry reach its peak?
/r/MensRights23/05/24 04:41 AM
6

I would say yes, because it's always been this way for males since the dawn of civilization and truly even before that.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 04:37 AM
3

You can be accused of sending something inappropriate when you're alone.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 01:59 PM
3

Every person has a moral compass, it's just every compass points to a different place, and sometimes people don't follow it
/r/MensRights22/05/24 01:57 PM
1

"Comrade" is gender-neutral, they should use it
/r/MensRights22/05/24 04:38 AM
9

Only if I have to choose between her and a bear
/r/MensRights21/05/24 01:50 PM
14

violence and discrimination against men will be systemic Like, one day it will be completely legal to mutilate boys' genitals? Or at some point, men will be taken by force to fight in wars?
/r/MensRights19/05/24 03:59 AM
5

any worker has the right to refuse to work under the right kind of circumstances. That's true for every job. The worker has a right to decide they don't want to work there anymore and leave.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 01:43 PM
9

It's not that different from the "I'm not racist, but..." talk. "Everything before 'but' is horseshit", as Eddard Stark used to say
/r/MensRights18/05/24 11:49 AM
43

I hope they feel safe in the forest, with all those bears around
/r/MensRights15/05/24 07:07 PM
12

Yes, and being sexist is the reason
/r/MensRights15/05/24 12:59 PM
4

Of course less civilians will be lost if half of them are forced to become combatants.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/24 11:46 AM
10

What am I supposed to do if I walk at night and see a woman that walks towards me? Raise my hands, identify myself and explain why I'm here? Run away? Maybe, I should not be allowed outside when it's dark without another woman's supervision? Can't blame people for having phobias, but no one can deal with their phobias for them.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/05/24 08:40 AM
1

What did the woman answer to "man or bear"? If she thinks men are more dangerous than bears, she has all the motivation to "preemptively" kill me in my sleep. And there is nothing I can do to change her opinion. Protecting myself from a bear would be easier because bears are less intelligent than humans.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 03:51 AM
23

A woman, but only if there is a camera that records everything inside the car. Otherwise I walk.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 04:53 AM
3

It's the same as saying "real feminists are against MGM". As opposed to regular feminists who aren't.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 05:30 AM
3

The earthlings who think it's stupid are part of the problem
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:52 AM
25

And men are responsible for society
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/24 01:20 PM
40

Literally 0 women died on Venus in centuries. It must be the safest place in the world.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 01:01 PM
8

Just feminists fighting for women's reproductive rights, I guess.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/05/24 12:50 PM
3

How much research is needed to find truth in feminism?
/r/MensRights07/05/24 05:13 AM
5

I want every existing law to be written in a way when it doesn't mention sex or gender, directly or indirectly. It's not really a law if it doesn't work in half of cases. Indiscriminately banning genital mutilation is the first candidate for that, if you ask me. It should also be illegal to enslave all people and put them into grave danger in miserable conditions. Meaning, conscription and draft. The number of laws that still mention sex or gender is a metric that shows how close we are to victo…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 08:53 PM
16

I have never seen a bear outside a cage. And I grew up in Russia.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:33 PM
40

Of course not, only the patriarchy makes these choices. So, if it's a boy, he is naturally a part of the patriarchy and so he is responsible for its choice. The chances are high that the patriarchy will force his mother to abuse him. Well, the patriarchy hurts men too. /s because I wouldn't be surprised if a feminist wrote something like this with a serious face
/r/EverydayMisandry06/05/24 03:59 PM
2

If you are Bear Grylls, I'll choose to stay in the forest with you
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:20 AM
17

Congratulations on the transition, you were a man just a month ago according to your posts
/r/EverydayMisandry05/05/24 04:37 AM
7

Even if it is true, it means that 2 in 3 women are not attacked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 07:07 PM
2

If one person understood something after reading those posts, it was worth it
/r/MensRights03/05/24 01:07 PM
83

How many women have been saved by a boat full of bears?
/r/MensRights03/05/24 07:36 AM
4

Who will believe you when it's time to go back home and you come alone?
/r/MensRights03/05/24 06:25 AM
1

Yes we are, other Barry. Yes we are.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 06:23 AM
16

The "bear" option is a box with 10 pieces of shit. They just love eating shit, so 1 in 10 isn't good enough
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 04:51 AM
10

Also it's not that bad because any boy wants to be molested, even if he says he doesn't.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/05/24 02:44 PM
15

...and all men need to apologize for it
/r/EverydayMisandry02/05/24 02:40 PM
3

Feminists: misandry isn't real Also feminists: They have to be subdued with laws and like ferocious animals have to CONSTANTLY be taught and told not to hurt other people.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/05/24 12:08 PM
2

Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. He is 2.3 meters tall. Ewoks are much less civilized than an average human. Now can you see why Chewbacca lives on Endor?
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:34 AM
37

I mean it as a man. If I stayed in the forest with a woman, and she attacked me, I wouldn't have any choice but to stay in the forest forever: either dead if I don't fight back, or alive but hiding from the police if I do.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 10:03 AM
89

"If a bear attacks me, I will be allowed to protect myself"
/r/MensRights02/05/24 09:55 AM
41

You are correct, it is gaslighting. There is nothing you can do to change their opinion. You either agree that men are naturally dangerous or disagree, which will be taken as "naturally dangerous man in denial". Either way, they want you to be ashamed of being a man so you would look for a way to be "an ally" until you "redeem" yourself. Here is the catch: Your "crime" is being the same gender as a psychopath that your opponent once met or heard about. You can't be redeemed because you continue …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 08:15 AM
5

the reason so many women and men included choose the bear is because they have personal experiences with untrustworthy humans I just don’t understand why anyone wouldn’t understand the immense fear of being raped or tortured… Personal experiences and fears can make someone prejudiced, I don't have any doubt about that. It does explain why they say hateful things, but it doesn't make it acceptable.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 12:55 PM
1

The same downsides are the same as with cutting healthy skin from any other part of a child's body. It is painful, pointless, dangerous and traumatizing.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 12:46 PM
7

Let me be more specific: you don't know if the bear is hungry, and you don't know if the woman is a horny d$$e with a 12 inch strap and knifes strapped to both thighs You only know that the bear is a bear, and the woman is a woman. What would you choose?
/r/MensRights01/05/24 12:23 PM
10

Women can do the same too. Not all of them, but some. Would you choose a bear or a woman?
/r/MensRights01/05/24 12:04 PM
13

That's how censorship begins. You just call it something else, punish people for disagreeing and respond "that's different!" to anyone who points it out. For example, in Russia, censorship started as "protecting children from information that can hurt them" or something like that. At first, it was about suicide cults, then child molesters, soon enough "gay propaganda" was added to the list, and so on. Officially censorship is still banned right in the Constitution. But "that's different, anyone …
/r/MensRights01/05/24 07:37 AM
13

That answers my question
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:27 PM
15

So, you think that most women say and do sexist things without actually being sexist?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 06:54 PM
21

Women who wouldnt feel safe around an "average man" are sexist. Do you really think that most women are sexist?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 06:20 PM
24

The question doesn't specifically say that the man in question is a psychopath. I assumed it was about an average man, why did you assume otherwise?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 05:44 PM
-6

The movie is good, but the story of making it is much better.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 09:40 AM
28

A bear won't help me to build a shelter, find a water source and food.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 09:32 AM
3

Russia
/r/MensRights25/04/24 11:26 AM
29

"And if she had the superior chromosome combination, the patriarchy forced her to do that"
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/24 06:16 AM
21

"Kill all men" in action
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/24 05:50 AM
9

Where I'm from, men usually pay to avoid being in the military
/r/MensRights25/04/24 05:48 AM
8

The store is literally called "feminist trash"
/r/EverydayMisandry22/04/24 05:06 AM
4

Lizard people. Anyone in a "position of power" is a lizard person, male or female. Anyone in a "position of power" who is proven to be human is brainwashed by the lizard people and doesn't act on their own will. Anyone who denies the existence of lizard people is a lizard person, works for the lizard people or is brainwashed by the lizard people. They are going to use similar arguments to prove that the answer is "men", so you can have a lot of fun with it.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 03:19 PM
13

Feminism is defined by fighting for women's rights, not by reaching equality, equity, a matriarchy or killing all men. They need the fight to continue forever, because as self-proclaimed equality fighters, they can justify any hate they spread. If one day a feminist said "women are not oppressed anymore", they would face a serious dilemma. One option would be accepting that "now it is time to start fixing men's issues". Another option would be confirming that they never wanted equality in the fi…
/r/MensRights17/04/24 04:41 PM
32

Yes, I am really bothered by victim blaming and other forms of narcissistic behaviors.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 06:40 AM
2

No, Cathy Newman, I'm not saying it. I'm saying men are different.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 04:52 AM
24

But you know how men are. Yes, I know. Men are different. They Some men will pay for OF or other porn sites while simultaneously other men are denigrating the type of women who create that same content. They Some men love to watch those women but at the same time other men won't ever marry a women who has done those things even if she isn't actively doing it anymore.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 04:15 PM
35

"Trash" isn't a gendered insult, why is she so angry?
/r/EverydayMisandry10/04/24 10:09 AM
1

Don't forget that at the same time it's for equality, and good for men too!
/r/MensRights10/04/24 09:45 AM
1

Sort of, but it would sound offensive, so they use terms like "toxic masculinity" and "internalized misogyny" instead
/r/MensRights09/04/24 01:21 PM
41

Not everyone, only women
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/24 09:40 AM
3

Internalised misogyny seems to place the blame back on men, and doesn’t really highlight feminine or female character traits in and of themselves . According to feminism, all "feminine traits" are just the expectations of "the misogynistic patriarchy" (="all men") which get unconsciously "internalized" by women. So, if a man behaves in a certain way, it's his choice, or his nature, or actions of other men (="all men"="this specific man"). And if a woman behaves in a certain way, it can't be her …
/r/MensRights09/04/24 06:51 AM
6

When women do the same things, it is called "internalized misogyny", another needlessly gendered term.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 03:23 AM
26

Misandrists in the government did try to take my bodily autonomy. I had to spend almost a month in the mental hospital and bribe the conscription officer to keep it.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/04/24 09:46 AM
4

Being a woman isn't a choice, being a feminist is.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 02:51 AM
6

The correct term is male genital mutilation. Everyone who does it to a child should go to prison.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:48 AM
9

Great, now we need articles "Why it's not ok to say 'Kill All Jews'", "Why it's not ok to say 'Kill All Gays'" and "Why it's not ok to say 'Kill All Black People'"
/r/MensRights04/04/24 09:34 AM
8

Catherine the Great fits too
/r/MensRights03/04/24 02:24 PM
17

In other words, "all the knowledge I need is already inside my head, and no matter what I see with my own eyes, my opinion won't change"
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/24 11:49 AM
10

But do you know how men win piano competitions? They use their privilege to force women to win violin competitions.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/24 06:40 AM
4

When I learned to play, the vast majority of teachers and students in the music school were women and girls. Only accordion and bayan (same thing with different keyboard) were "male-dominated", those things are really heavy.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 12:15 PM
6

I'll play some slow piano music to make crying more comfortable
/r/MensRights02/04/24 12:03 PM
4

Yes. A real man doesn't fall for such primitive manipulations
/r/MensRights01/04/24 03:41 PM
2

It is a loaded feminist term that means "following gender stereotypes" for men, just like "internalized misogyny" for women. Both terms assume why someone follows said stereotypes. For men, it is either their nature, or other men's fault. At the same time, women can only follow gender stereotypes if they experienced so much misogyny they internalized it. Basically, it's like "their sinister spies" vs "our honored scouts".
/r/MensRights01/04/24 03:06 PM
15

Yes, I agree, it is not the only reason feminism grew into a conspiracy theory. I think another important reason is that feminism is defined by fighting, not by reaching any measurable goal. Ask any feminist, what should happen so they will say "ok, we won, our fight is over, let's go home", there can be no answer to that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/24 01:49 PM
55

Probably because women are wonderful
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/24 05:46 AM
4

Because if they married a man who makes less than them, they would lose the status of "oppressed victims". And without that status, they would be responsible for their own words and actions, just like men.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 07:13 AM
0

Yes, it is misogyny to generalize women
/r/EverydayMisandry18/03/24 07:37 AM
27

If saying "men should have human rights" is considered hate, it may be true
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/24 06:55 PM
12

Well, if I'm drafted and killed at a war, no woman will sleep with me, that's true
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/24 12:01 PM
5

And North Korea is a Democratic People's Republic
/r/MensRights15/03/24 08:33 PM
3

I'm a pastafarian, which means I believe that every man is a person and every woman is a person. My thoughts about any text that mentions "men as a group" or "women as a group" are the same: heresy.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 11:26 AM
2

As an alternative, any Russian man is entitled to a free one-way trip to Ukraine
/r/MensRights11/03/24 06:00 AM
2

"Jewish people"
/r/MensRights10/03/24 04:28 PM
6

And if a man does not express them, that's because of "toxic masculinity"
/r/MensRights10/03/24 06:43 AM
5

without toxic masculinity and the patriarchy men wouldn't suffer from these problems. Why is(n't) that true? It is true, if by both "toxic masculinity" and "patriarchy" you mean "men". Without men, men wouldn't suffer, makes sense.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 06:14 AM
7

It's because of the people who believe that women are ultimately inferior to men, so they use their political and social power to advocate for such injustices to show the women their place. In one word, feminists.
/r/MensRights03/03/24 11:58 AM
11

I think that companies should base their hiring and promotion strategies on the professional qualities of the candidates, not their gender.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 11:08 AM
8

Logical thinking means making conclusions from data. Feminist thinking means yelling at any data that doesn't lead to the conclusion they need.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 08:09 AM
4

All these expectations are inside your head. A good therapist can help you to get rid of them and put an end to "the patriarchy"
/r/MensRights28/02/24 08:22 PM
6

r/unexpectedCommunism
/r/MensRights28/02/24 08:18 PM
18

Be careful, don't damage your privilege!
/r/MensRights28/02/24 08:12 PM
1

It is basically the same. Patriarchy means men, and testosterone means men.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 09:46 PM
1

It makes sense if they mean a meeting room in a big company that has hiring quotas for women.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:02 PM
3

r/MenKampf content
/r/MensRights26/02/24 06:35 PM
4

Catherine the Great is men
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/24 04:23 PM
3

Having the status of "oppressed" grants all kinds of privileges and can be used as an excuse for any cruelty. They have negative motivation to ask questions.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 08:24 PM
24

The whole world too. It's also true for any country and any city.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 07:04 PM
24

There are fewer men than women, it means men are a minority
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:56 PM
22

No...
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:37 PM
9

Exactly. There can be no other reason to remove skin from a child's body.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:36 PM
2

Men's and women's legal rights should be equal, by that I mean that any law should not include any reference to the citizen's gender.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:32 AM
4

because some people are too stupid to analyze data correctly and asume gender x is oppressed based on distorted data I'm not sure I understand correctly, do you mean "equality feminists" call themselves feminists because they are too stupid to see the contradiction?
/r/MensRights21/02/24 08:44 AM
7

If it's about equality, why is it called feminism?
/r/MensRights21/02/24 08:32 AM
5

It's one of the least important problems in Russia
/r/MensRights17/02/24 12:10 PM
2

You know "real Nazis"? They fought for equality between Jews and Aryans, never killed anyone and were generally good people. Unfortunately, the vast majority of Nazis were "unreal", so any information about the "real" Nazis is buried under tons of evidence of the "unreal" ones' crimes. Real feminists are something like that.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 11:21 AM
1

Real Feminists fight for equality and equity. Equality and equity are mutually exclusive
/r/MensRights15/02/24 09:08 AM
17

And it sounds like she had sex with someone else in the boy's bed
/r/MensRights14/02/24 03:11 PM
1

If you listen to them carefully, you can come up with a question that they won't be able to answer without admitting their bigotry. Better make it a "yes/no" question, and make sure you only base it on what they said. When you ask that question, they will start spinning like a snake in a frying pan trying to avoid answering it. Their responses will be completely unrelated to what was asked, and that's how you know you are on the right path. Then it's important to remember the question, and to ke…
/r/MensRights14/02/24 06:00 AM
3

In Russian, "выцыганивать" (цыган = gypsy) means "to annoy someone until they agree with you just to shut you up"
/r/MensRights13/02/24 04:55 PM
17

And not just to a woman, but to a man, and to a child too.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 11:11 AM
13

"The patriarchy" is built for men, so women are forced to play by the same rules. They rape men to prove their masculinity too, but it's different because they actually hate doing it. And if they don't hate it, it's because "the patriarchy" made them believe it is fine. And also, women never rape men, only in the dreams of incels like you. /s
/r/MensRights13/02/24 07:57 AM
12

Are you sure it is physically possible to be "enough" for him?
/r/RedPillWomen12/02/24 05:30 PM
11

You are basically saying that women make worse slaves than men, so male-only slavery is fine. Have you ever considered that slavery isn't fine at all?
/r/MensRights12/02/24 07:08 AM
1

I don’t understand the need to mention why one part is worse than the other Why do you do it then?
/r/MensRights12/02/24 06:14 AM
0

No, you're still missing all the important parts: Are you 100% supportive of this? Is this kind of sex work is empowering for all invovled? Is this good sir doing good things for women? Is he trying to help?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 04:46 PM
1

You are talking about something completely different. A male prostitute is paid by a man to deflower his daughter. Same as in the post, but with reversed genders. Do you think he is doing a good thing?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 03:41 PM
7

I never said anything about them not being rare
/r/MensRights11/02/24 03:35 PM
2

Go ahead then, say it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 03:32 PM
13

Like, any life threatening situation?
/r/MensRights11/02/24 03:31 PM
28

Still better than being dead
/r/MensRights11/02/24 02:06 PM
3

I'm sure that any parent that arranged their child's deflowering by an older stranger, believes they did something good. Or any parent that arranged a correctional rape for their homosexual child. Or any parent that forced their child to marry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 12:47 PM
2

You're talking about girls and a male prostitute, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 11:20 AM
1

You misspelled narcissism
/r/MensRights11/02/24 10:57 AM
3

Of course not, it would be as terrible if it was a thing. I'm more concerned about the children, it must be seriously traumatizing for them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 10:51 AM
2

The irrational suspicion that any man might be going to attack a woman - based on nothing but the fact that he has the same gender as some other person.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 10:37 AM
7

2) Some men do kill women. It's rare, but it's enough that they need to be concerned. Can you give the exact number? And then an example of something "rare but enough to be concerned" that women do.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 10:02 AM
5

You missed the important part: I think this lady is doung good things for men, the greater relstionship between men and women are not her fault, but at least she is trying to help. If it was a male prostitute who got paid by fathers to deflower their daughters, would you say something like this about him? I think this good sir is doung good things for women, the greater relstionship between men and women are not his fault, but at least he is trying to help.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 09:59 AM
9

Now say the same about a male prostitute that gets paid for deflowering girls by their fathers
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 06:30 AM
4

Literally: The act or state of holding unreasonable preconceived judgments or convictions. An adverse judgment or opinion formed unfairly or without knowledge of the facts. Irrational suspicion or hatred of a particular social group, such as a race or the adherents of a religion.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 06:28 AM
7

The problem is exactly the same as if fathers were bringing their daughters to be deflowered by a male prostitute.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/24 06:26 AM
5

So, it's prejudice
/r/MensRights11/02/24 05:15 AM
11

As soon as someone manages to change the past
/r/MensRights06/02/24 03:09 PM
3

It gets posted here a lot, and I'm totally fine with it
/r/MensRights01/01/24 08:44 AM
3

I love the last one. She knows exactly what feminism looks like from the outside. She understands that her behavior isn't different from hating men. "It walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, flies like a duck and swims like a duck. It must be a penguin."
/r/MensRights01/01/24 08:42 AM
9

Israel. Men serve 3 years, women serve 2, married women don't have to serve at all. There are other smaller differences, none of them favors men.
/r/MensRights01/01/24 07:39 AM
3

I know about BPD symptoms more than I ever wanted
/r/MensRights28/12/23 05:42 PM
12

I think a man can also become a feminist if he was abused until he started to hate himself for being a man.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 07:20 AM
27

When did it become acceptable to shame adult consenting people for having relationships?
/r/MensRights26/12/23 02:49 PM
2

I'm not a native speaker, and it happens to me sometimes. Narcissist: I can't do anything wrong because I'm naturally such a good person. Feminist: Feminists can't do anything wrong because feminism is good.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 08:02 AM
7

Of course not! A narcissist thinks they personally can't be wrong or unjust. Feminists think that they can't be wrong or unjust as a group. Checkmate! /s
/r/MensRights26/12/23 07:19 AM
20

Legal equality certainly can exist, if all gendered laws are rewritten to be non-gendered.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 08:04 AM
1

Yes. Soon after I was hired, she became a team leader in a team of 5 or 6, including me. In a year of her management it was just her and another girl. I went to another company, others moved to other teams inside the same company.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 08:55 PM
3

What if I'm a fan of a women's football team?
/r/MensRights20/12/23 03:32 PM
1

Why won't they tell it to their husbands? Why did they choose to marry men who don't meet their expectations? Why won't they get a divorce if their family life is so unhappy?
/r/MensRights17/12/23 04:48 PM
11

According to feminism, women are unable to make their own decisions, because every woman's decision is made under the oppression of "the patriarchy" aka men - otherwise, women would do exactly what feminists expect them to do.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 08:01 PM
31

Is "prophylaxis of HIV" necessary for a "healthy newborn"?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:14 AM
1

It's one of the patriarchal conspiracies, men want more women to do the same job for 0.7 of a man's salary /s Seriously, maybe they think that women naturally can't compete with men when they are given the same opportunities. Or maybe they are just unhappy that women don't try hard enough to meet someone's expectations.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 08:59 AM
0

You can't start with observation and come to the conclusion that TM is structural. You can only start with the axiom "TM is structural, TF is not" and come to the conclusion that every injustice you observe is a result of structural TM. It's a classic logical fallacy: If A results in B, and B is useful for me, A must be true.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/12/23 07:39 AM
29

They don't know what "minority" means. They'll probably say that women are a minority in comparison to men too.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/12/23 08:43 AM
7

I'm glad they didn't scroll far enough to see my comments in Hebrew
/r/MensRights03/12/23 07:53 AM
11

We had a long conversation, so they ran out of arguments and resorted to stalking my comment history.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 07:01 AM
13

I got called a "Russian dog" by a feminist once
/r/MensRights03/12/23 06:35 AM
1

In democracy, a candidate wins if the majority of the population votes for them. Most voters are women. So, building the political program around women is a working strategy to win the election. If it was legal and socially acceptable to build the program around white people, the politicians would do it too.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 06:27 AM
0

How do you "risk women" as a tribal society, when they literally don't have anywhere to go? You treat them exactly like men: send them to hunt, explore, build, do the heavy building, protect etc. It results in more women dying and your tribe slowly becomes history. What motivates you to treat them well, if they're weak and defenseless? Instincts.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 03:48 PM
1

If a tribe risked women as much as it risked men, it naturally couldn't reproduce as fast as others. As I said, women are the bottleneck from this perspective. Losing a woman affected the reproduction rate of the tribe much more than losing a man. So, the ones who valued women's lives more than men's lives survived and reproduced.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 10:19 PM
4

I think it's homophobic. A man is a man, straight, gay or trans.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/23 11:52 AM
5

It is indeed a general pattern known as "Women are wonderful" effect.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 11:46 AM
1

Natural selection. Tribes that didn't treat women better than men couldn't reproduce as quickly as ones that did. Because biological women are the bottleneck of reproduction: 20 men and 10 women won't reproduce as quickly as 10 men and 20 women.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 11:45 AM
1

Is she standing right behind me?
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:45 AM
2

If I'm hungry, I would definitely rather have a potato than a plane ticket. If I need to travel, buying a potato won't help me. If I want someone else to do my chores, I hire a professional. If I love a woman and want to spend my life with her, I marry her.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 06:50 PM
4

So, they're equal when I'm hungry and not equal when I want to travel?
/r/MensRights28/11/23 06:45 PM
4

Potatoes are cheaper than plane tickets, does it equate them together?
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:14 PM
8

Why do you think that? If that was true, I would choose the cheaper and more reliable option.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:01 PM
29

As a married man, hiring a housekeeper to come once a week, ordering food from restaurants and having paid sex seems a lot cheaper than marrying.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 12:00 PM
10

I tried, but this cannot be reversed without lying: We make up most of the suicides, we make up most of the homicide victims, we make up most of the homeless, we make up most of the lower class jobs, we are graduating college at a lower rate than women.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 08:54 AM
58

Being left or right isn't what everyone agrees on here. We agree that men should have human rights
/r/MensRights21/11/23 11:31 AM
7

If all women are nice, she is not a woman
/r/MensRights20/11/23 06:25 AM
3

Adventure time
/r/MensRights20/11/23 06:09 AM
6

I think it's called egalitarianism
/r/MensRights20/11/23 06:05 AM
2

So, democracy is not patriarchy?
/r/MensRights19/11/23 01:39 PM
2

Yeah I keep forgetting that a person with average intelligence is smarter than half of the population
/r/MensRights19/11/23 07:54 AM
1

It's already morning in Israel, and Google logo is the regular one
/r/MensRights19/11/23 06:35 AM
5

So, patriarchy = democracy?
/r/MensRights19/11/23 05:14 AM
3

I hope that most people vote for the candidate they trust, not for men or for women
/r/MensRights19/11/23 05:09 AM
8

Because they don't have any legitimate logical arguments, only whataboutism, name-calling etc.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 08:38 AM
4

"Women are wonderful" effect. Both men and women tend to empathize with women more than with men.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 06:48 AM
24

It's a mistake to think they actually want men to meet any standards. They want men to constantly feel they naturally cannot be good enough, so it will be easier to manipulate them.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 06:29 AM
14

r/menKampf
/r/MensRights14/11/23 04:34 AM
5

To replace the no-no words
/r/MensRights13/11/23 07:17 PM
152

I've never been in a group where saying "Man I hate women" was considered normal. And I grew up in a place where "Man I hate (gay men) and (black people)" was fine.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 09:01 AM
1

Have you noticed that "the patriarchy" now means just "men" and not "rich (risky, lucky) men"?
/r/MensRights13/11/23 08:44 AM
1

Then a feminist would probably say something like "For a woman, every day in the patriarchy is a risk! The patriarchy can kill and rape her anytime without any consequences. A man's risk is to not become extremely rich, a woman's risk is to die! You can't compare it!"
/r/MensRights13/11/23 08:26 AM
1

It can be done in a number of ways. Gaslighting: you're a horrible person if you don't see why they don't matter. Victim blaming: they failed even though "the patriarchy" gave them all the privilege, so it's their own fault they couldn't make it. True Scotsman: they aren't true men. True men are risky and rich.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 05:55 AM
1

Yeah, but then you ask them how to define "rich men" and "being risky". "Rich men" will mean "all men", and "being risky" will mean "being a man".
/r/MensRights12/11/23 09:26 AM
2

Does she at least post evidence that her claim was registered by the police? Yes - I wouldn't take sides until it's resolved. No - Most likely she is lying.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 07:36 AM
7

It would be if women weren't so wonderful
/r/MensRights12/11/23 06:47 AM
9

"Patriarchy" can't have a definition. A functional definition would make it possible to find "the patriarchy" and destroy it for good. And even the theoretical possibility of a victory would be a huge problem for feminism, just like with other similar ideologies. Being able to find and identify the enemy would mean that their attacks should be targeted only at something that satisfies the definition. Otherwise, anything or anyone can be called "the enemy", making it "legitimate targets". Being a…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 06:43 AM
3

Making men and women legally equal will only benefit men.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 05:28 AM
141

Repeatedly asking us to open up and when we finally do, respond with "not like that" or "it's not that bad"
/r/MensRights09/11/23 05:11 AM
7

Playing as a man is competitive gaming. You get a lot more quests, they are much harder and can kill your character for good. Either you complete them and end up as a strong character with lots of XP and gold - or you're demoted to an NPC no one cares about (if your character survives and you don't ragequit the game earlier). So, as a result, only the strong male characters stay in the game. That's why some gamers think that there is a "male privilege" in the game.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 07:13 AM
2

There is no male-led system (because modern western societies are led by democratically elected leaders regardless of their gender) that oppresses women either (because every enforced sexist law in modern western societies treats women better than men). It doesn't stop feminists from fighting it though.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 06:17 AM
5

To this day, I have never seen an example of a legal right that men have and women don't in modern western societies. But I have seen examples of the opposite. I mean, published and enforced laws that literally say "in the same situation, a man gets A, and a woman gets B" - I've never seen an example where B is worse than A. You are welcome to try to find it. Otherwise, by your definition, modern feminists have to fight against "female privilege", "gynocentric society" and "systemic misandry".
/r/MensRights07/11/23 08:27 AM
4

No, it would mean you want men to have the same human rights as women, but at the same time you want women to have more human rights than men.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 06:22 AM
5

I just don't think in such categories. A woman is a person, a man is a person, and so it would be unproductive to generalize "men" and "women" as "oppressors" and "victims" or the other way around.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:16 AM
31

No, it says "gender stereotypes"
/r/MensRights03/11/23 10:49 AM
37

If by masculine you mean traumatized, yes
/r/MensRights03/11/23 09:07 AM
3

And yes men are privileged, it’s ignorant to say otherwise So you're saying, all men are the same?
/r/MensRights30/10/23 09:03 AM
8

Only if you are successful, I guess
/r/MensRights26/10/23 11:03 AM
5

Calls to violence against men are legal. Enforced military service. Genital mutilation. Not necessarily in this order
/r/MensRights26/10/23 06:25 AM
1

Isn't that just prostitution with extra steps?
/r/MensRights18/10/23 07:47 AM
8

I don't think borders stay open for someone who is drafted
/r/MensRights17/10/23 06:06 AM
10

THERE IS NO DRAFT IMPLEMENTED DURING THE TIME OF THIS POST No draft implemented in the US... I have 2 citizenships and both countries have active drafts right now. Here in Israel, my chances to be drafted are quite low since I'm not as young, not as healthy and I haven't served as a conscript. Women who served as conscripts are more likely to get drafted than me. I think I can still be drafted to work outside the battlefield (jobnik). In Russia, I would have already been sent to fertilize Ukrain…
/r/MensRights15/10/23 07:41 AM
23

That's exactly the problem
/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:53 PM
1

Thanks! Looks like they didn't share the CVs themselves, the companies they contacted, the messages they received from them - just the results. If they published it, there would be a way to verify the data with the companies. It's unethical to run experiments on unsuspecting people, so obviously the companies they called consented to it and won't cause any trouble for the authors. Without it, we only have to unconditionally believe their word.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 09:59 AM
14

I don't see anything that can be analyzed. Where is the study itself, with data and calculations?
/r/MensRights08/10/23 05:57 AM
8

No, treating people of different demographics differently is the total opposite of egalitarianism, short-term or long-term. You wouldn't "inevitably" come to this conclusion if you considered helping disadvantaged individuals and not "members of demographics".
/r/MensRights06/10/23 12:56 PM
1

Happy C-day!
/r/MensRights05/10/23 09:36 AM
1

the system of governance by high-ranking officials in Orthodox Christianity Correct, as far as I know there is a whole hierarchy of patriarchies in Orthodox Christianity, and their leaders are called "patriarchs". One of the patriarchs is Patriarch Kirill of Moscow, aka Sergey Gundyayev. He is responsible for pretty much every crime "The Patriarchy" would commit, including starting wars. So, if by "patriarchy" feminists mean the Moscow Patriarchy, it exists, its leader is evil, and it does brain…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 09:35 AM
1

How would you define the sysem in this scenario? Is everything else reversed too? Are women dying more, is it legal to mutilate female baby genitals, are women taken by force to serve in the military? Can I destroy any woman's life by saying she raped me without any evidence? If I cry in public, do people around me try to help me or do they turn away in disgust? If I talk about men's issues, what reaction do I get - "you go boy" or "misogynistic incel"? Are male supremacy ideologies supported on…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 06:04 AM
1

If that's "the patriarchy", it certainly exists - even though not everyone feels it. It prioritizes men over women, it affects the decisions people make, and ironically, it's the exact thing feminists should deal with if they want equality.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 02:21 PM
3

Also, marriage isn't a patriarchy because it's voluntary. When I got married, both me and the bride had to say "yes" to a very specific question about consent, and sign an official document in front of a representative of the government and witnesses from both our families. Living in a patriarchy, on the other hand, is not a choice, and can't be avoided by simply saying "no".
/r/MensRights04/10/23 01:51 PM
1

More like "capitalism" was portrayed in Soviet propaganda. It's evil and everyone under its influence is suffering, even though they look happy. Those people unknowingly become pawns in the hands of Capitalism and blindly follow its evil goal - destroying the Motherland.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 09:38 AM
2

Sexism is discrimination of people by sex or gender. That's not something feminists want to destroy.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 09:29 AM
2

That social construct would be gone as soon as feminists stop openly following it and acting like everyone else secretly wants to follow it too. Which is why they hate that question.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 09:21 AM
3

But what exactly is it?
/r/MensRights04/10/23 08:09 AM
3

Ask one feminist a thousand times, and you still won't get the same answer twice.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 07:41 AM
2

More like a submissive one lol
/r/MensRights04/10/23 07:40 AM
2

On average, women spend more money than men, even though on average they are paid less. For a business owner, it means focusing on female customers is beneficial in most cases.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 07:29 AM
3

It's easy to believe in bullshit if the evidence against it never makes it to you, and you only see evidence (even if it is falsified evidence) in favor of it. It really is. I grew up in Russia, I would know. It's especially easy when any opposition is portrayed as evil, insane or corrupt ("don't listen to these crazy MRAs"). And I love stories like yours. Doing what you did requires courage, confidence and intelligence.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 07:02 AM
4

This is perfect. It's a privilege so it makes your life easier. At the same time it's so hidden it doesn't affect your life in any way.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 04:33 AM
42

I'm male, white, straight, Jewish and I grew up in Russia. I'm the reason for all the suffering in the world.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 08:25 AM
28

the vigilance women have to keep in order to not be murdered. You mean, the irrational vigilance some women and men have to keep in order to not feel like they are going to be murdered.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 09:17 AM
22

Let's say Alice accuses Bob, and we want to determine if her accusations are true or false. If Alice has evidence that Bob has indeed raped her, we can conclude that Bob is guilty, which means the accusation is true. If Bob has an alibi, we can conclude that Bob is innocent, and the accusation is false. It gets more complicated if Alice doesn't have evidence and Bob doesn't have an alibi. In this "he said - she said" case, we can't objectively say if Alice's accusations are true or false: Alice …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 06:58 AM
3

Homelessness is male-dominated
/r/MensRights28/09/23 08:56 AM
5

Ask them for specific numbers, how many men and women are hurt yearly because of misandry/misogyny, and how many are hurt for nonsexist reasons. Then get ready to see some mental gymnastics performance (and no numbers other than 99% and 1%). My prediction, they're going to tell you how men control everything, so anything bad that happens to a man is a result of his actions/doesn't actually happen/isn't that bad/is collateral damage/any other narcissistic rhetoric. Unlike women, whose actions don…
/r/MensRights27/09/23 06:32 AM
43

The teacher too
/r/MensRights24/09/23 04:49 AM
7

I don't even care if I see a man dating another man who is 30 years older
/r/MensRights23/09/23 06:05 AM
4

function doesPatriarchyExist() { return doesPatriarchyExist() || !doesPatriarchyExist(); }
/r/MensRights21/09/23 04:50 PM
48

Their thought process (I won't call it logic) works like that: The patriarchy is known for being unjust to women. Women sometimes face injustices. Therefore, the patriarchy exists. It is the same existential fallacy as this: Zeus is known for making lightnings. Lightnings sometimes hit Earth. Therefore, Zeus exists.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 10:34 AM
3

Same story, really. If you disagree with a feminist, they call you an incel misogynist. If you disagree with a putinist, they call you a traitor and a Nazi supporter.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 09:57 AM
7

You must be the winner of the Feminist Politeness Tournament
/r/MensRights20/09/23 02:23 PM
11

I always wonder what method they use to determine if an accusation is true or false without evidence. No one knows though, it's probably some feminist secret protected by NDA. If it wasn't a secret, this method could be used in courts, completely fixing the false accusations issue. Jk, I know they just pull the numbers from their noses.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 07:36 AM
8

"Toxic masculinity" is a loaded term. It means following gender stereotypes if you're a man. If you're a woman, it's called "internalized misogyny" instead. It can only make sense for someone who has real motivation to make it make sense. Like legal privileges, a chance to have sex with a feminist (ugh), not taking responsibly for one's own life, avoiding some sort of punishment, the feeling of righteousness, the desire to hurt people without consequences, etc. Negotiation with one's own conscio…
/r/MensRights19/09/23 07:51 AM
12

My mom blamed me for having "issues" after years of abuse. She was the abuser.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 12:54 AM
4

Where I'm from, if you are accused of rape and get to prison, you are almost guaranteed to be raped by your cellmates.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 02:57 PM
5

It depends on your definition of "men". If by "men" you mean "adult human males", the phrase "men hold all the power" doesn't make any sense. To make it make sense, you have to define "men" as "a tiny minority of men and women who make decisions in the government". Then you have to forget about the change, and continue with your life believing that "adult human males hold all the power".
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:58 AM
3

Politicians want more votes, businesses want more money. Women vote more than men, and make the majority of financial decisions.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 04:23 AM
3

The patriarchy in those women's heads controls them, so any decision they make isn't actually theirs /s
/r/MensRights16/09/23 06:56 AM
11

No I don't think so. There are egalitarians who call themselves "real" feminists for some reason. However, they are mostly a myth because they have never achieved anything more than comments on Reddit, without being criticized by regular feminists.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:53 PM
4

Yes, using public transit can be a good idea, it reduces traffic and saves fuel.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:39 PM
60

She depends on the public transportation network. To be completely independent she has to walk.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 03:39 AM
10

Self-burn
/r/MensRights15/09/23 03:29 AM
2

You could open the laws of your country and start reading. Write down every law that works differently for men and women. Then count how many laws privilege men and women.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:39 AM
28

Radical feminists don't hide the nature of their ideology. They openly say that men should have fewer human rights than women. Regular ones believe they are paladins of equality, so any harm they do is "for the greater good". Though no one knows how close we are to the greater good and when it is going to happen. Just like communism in USSR propaganda. There are also "real" feminists, who are basically egalitarians. If they are popular enough to have a Wikipedia page, you will find "anti-feminis…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 05:39 PM
2

Right? He supposedly sacrificed his friends, just because he wanted to be tortured by Ukrainians
/r/MensRights12/09/23 07:09 AM
12

We can have standards, but only if they are double
/r/MensRights12/09/23 05:52 AM
-1

Shocking news, a Russian soldier stole a helicopter and surrendered it to Ukraine because he wanted to be tortured: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/24/europe/russian-pilot-defection-helicopter-intl/index.html
/r/MensRights12/09/23 05:41 AM
2

If empathy is wrong then yes, you are in the wrong indeed.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 04:30 AM
11

What does "DV lessons" mean? Is it some Australian concept or are they explicitly saying they teach domestic violence?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/23 05:16 AM
9

It is going to sound stupid and maybe even offensive for your friend, but Invisible telepathic unicorns. They exist, but can't be found with any modern technology. They are known for their hatred for women, and they also have telepathic powers. But at the same time they are not very smart, so men suffer from their actions too. Everything she can present as evidence of a "patriarchy", will also be evidence of the invisible unicorns: Why are 10 richest people men? Invisible telepathic unicorns bra…
/r/MensRights02/09/23 08:19 PM
1

I didn't mean it was a bad thing. It is a win-win.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 07:25 PM
1

More attention to men's mental health would result in more clients bringing their money to the company. It's in their own interest.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 03:12 PM
6

Why would you want to intellectually challenge feminists, they're already intellectually challenged
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/23 06:41 PM
3

"Yes" what? Is it jail, fine, death sentence or something else? And since men have this right, they can legally abort their child at any period, right?
/r/MensRights31/08/23 06:32 AM
4

If that's true, what legal punishment do women get for visiting a gynecologist? Jail? Fine? Death sentence?
/r/MensRights31/08/23 06:15 AM
3

The OP's question was different: What right(s) men have that women doesn't have (in the west)? which right men have, that women doesn't have, in the west? Help me find rights that men have, I want to make a list of the so call "more rights" that men have.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 05:48 AM
3

I think you were going to reply to a different comment
/r/MensRights31/08/23 05:13 AM
14

Right to one’s own body. Nope. It's completely legal to mutilate male genitals, no one gets punished for it.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 05:07 AM
2

Is Russia "the west"? Because there men have a right for free transportation to Ukraine where they can become war criminals and die for putin.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 03:02 AM
4

The "real" feminists can be only found on Reddit. As soon as a feminist has a real name, some money and some political power, they instantly become a "fake" one.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 06:50 PM
12

Yeah those Nazis weren't the real ones
/r/MensRights30/08/23 04:40 PM
10

It's not appropriation, because men are a minority and they can't "appropriate" the majority's "culture". It's "cultural assimilation" if any. More importantly, there is no "male" or "female" culture. It's related to origins, not gender.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 05:21 AM
-1

First of all, there are biological differences. Women can't gain muscle mass as quickly as men. Women have special hygienic needs. Most importantly, women have to sacrifice more than a man to become a parent. Being pregnant, giving birth and breastfeeding doesn't look easy to me. Legally, I think in some places women aren't allowed to take jobs that require lifting weights more than 10 kg. Other than that, I've never seen a law that gives women any disadvantage. Socially, I think the attention (…
/r/MensRights29/08/23 08:18 AM
1

Sure, I could use a good laugh
/r/MensRights27/08/23 05:24 AM
5

And if there is no easy solution, it's not that big of a problem. And if it is a big problem, women have it worse. And if they don't, men are doing it to themselves. And if they aren't, they did something to deserve it. And if they didn't, it's justified. I've heard it too many times
/r/MensRights26/08/23 07:00 AM
2

Unfortunately it is common enough in Russia
/r/MensRights26/08/23 06:53 AM
3

And if you want to avoid conscription, you can just cut the skin on your arm, show the scars to the medical commission, stay in a mental hospital for a month and walk away a free man. Those "men's issues" always have easy solutions, don't they?
/r/MensRights26/08/23 06:02 AM
9

I wouldn't recommend that sub. Maybe it's just me, but I had some terrible experience with it.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 04:32 AM
14

What's the difference between "oligarchy" and "patriarchy"?
/r/MensRights25/08/23 06:01 AM
75

Because single women don't have anyone to cheat on
/r/MensRights25/08/23 05:55 AM
6

[The stereotype that women are passive and therefore cannot possibly be the violent one in a relationship] is a stereotype feminists literally are fighting against. I have only seen feminists fighting for this specific stereotype, never against it. you would side with feminists who want to remove this inequality and give fair treatment to both? No. If feminists do want to remove this inequality, they are terrible at doing it. I wouldn't like to side with incompetent people.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 06:06 AM
10

Great post! If you need an idea for a similar one, you could do Umberto Eco's "Ur-fascism".
/r/MensRights23/08/23 04:40 AM
16

Outside the US, most people can't legally own a gun. The situation must be significantly different there, right?.. Right?
/r/MensRights21/08/23 06:16 PM
1

As I said, if you want to successfully gaslight me, you have to be able to seriously punish me. It has to be a choice between "keep thinking logically" or "face the consequences". And it has to be inevitable. Of course you can try to keep "punishing" me with insulting comments, but I'm sure it's just a waste of time. If you still want to continue, but you're out of inspiration, the best/worst insult from a feminist that I've seen so far was "Russian dog", good luck!
/r/MensRights18/08/23 09:59 AM
3

I don't believe it. Formally speaking, it is impossible to prove that something does not exist, see Russell's teapot. And I have never seen any proof that the patriarchy exists in reality. Such a proof would include the names of the members and some documents showing that they intentionally did something that advantages men and/or discriminates against women. Ask them to prove that the "advantages" and "privileges" are not caused by invisible telepathic pink unicorns. Just like the patriarchy, t…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:10 AM
19

Since now, "the normal demographic of suicide" is my favorite euphemism for "men"
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:58 PM
3

And there are a lot of them on this site. Не может быть!
/r/MensRights17/08/23 03:27 PM
93

Every 5th suicide is a woman!
/r/MensRights17/08/23 03:11 PM
1

I see you changed your strategy from "being upset" to "gaslighting". If you want it to be successful, you have to be able to seriously punish me for not believing. Much more seriously than writing an insulting comment on Reddit. So, what are you going to do to me if I don't believe you?
/r/MensRights17/08/23 03:06 PM
1

Why wouldn't I? Both feminism and kkk segregate people by an immutable attribute, both focus on improving the life of the majority, and the most powerful members of both are responsible for discrimination of the minority. You being upset isn't a reason to abandon logic.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 06:02 AM
1

Do you use this same logic with race? Yes I do. Following the same logic, I don't think there is a way to be in kkk and tell how good and non-racist they are because "the ones responsible for the hate crimes aren't real kkk"
/r/MensRights16/08/23 01:48 PM
2

It's my turn to post this: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just "no true Scotsman". That's delusional s…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:21 AM
30

From my experience, this idea is mostly used to try to make men responsible for women's choices. Why don't 95+% of men work as garbage truck drivers (a fair and important job)? Because they chose different jobs. Why don't 99+% of women work as garbage truck drivers? Because they were excluded by men! The latter can only be true if every woman applied to the job, didn't get it specifically because of her gender, tried to sew the company for discrimination and failed. Good news, it can be proven b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/23 06:05 AM
7

If such a law existed, it would probably protect newborns as well, making MGM illegal.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 07:14 PM
10

Like playing chess with a pigeon. It will drop all the figures (wrong word?), shit on the board and fly away to tell its buddies that it won.
/r/AntiFeminists14/08/23 05:59 AM
11

Sadly, having a “male only” stall would be seen as sexist. Make the urinal stall unisex, problem solved.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 05:55 AM
17

"My son had a botched circumcision and died when he was 10 days old. But the surgery was done by a man, so it's fine."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/23 09:58 AM
2

Why don't you want him to know it for sure?
/r/MensRights10/08/23 06:17 AM
5

I want to see people involved in genital mutilation in prison, the doctors and the parents
/r/MensRights08/08/23 05:47 PM
2

Just like my mom said: "It's good that the people who hurt you the most were the people who loved you"
/r/MensRights08/08/23 06:08 AM
1

I have seen a post saying it's the women's fault for being raped for dressing a certain way. Just in case you are not lying, can you give me the link to that post, so I'll report it to the mods?
/r/MensRights08/08/23 05:52 AM
12

Because sexism against men isn't punished
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:29 AM
1

I used to work with a recently promoted female team leader. She believed that anyone who doesn't yell at people or objects, doesn't work hard enough. By that criterion, she was the most hardworking employee of the company. She also had a favorite joke: when someone tried to ask her a question, she used to interrupt them with "No", laugh and say "Just kidding, go on". 5 months after she got the position, she was the only member of her team: everyone else left either for a different company or for…
/r/MensRights06/08/23 09:02 AM
19

Feminists don't hate men. But it wouldn't matter if we did. Lol. "We don't hate men. Nothing in our behavior would be different if we did, but we don't"
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:36 AM
1

They said that men are always more powerful than women and always seen as leaders, I asked them if it's also true for a homeless man vs. female Prime Minister (New Zealand had one at the moment), they said yes. They also said a newborn boy has control over his mother, lol.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 06:21 AM
1

It was about a year ago
/r/MensRights06/08/23 05:38 AM
2

If she isn't happy with me, maybe she shouldn't be my wife. That's a way to ensure my wife is happy.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 09:48 AM
2

That a homeless man is privileged over a female prime minister because he's seen as a leader and she's not
/r/MensRights04/08/23 05:57 AM
3

Wikipedia: Feminism is a range of socio-political movements and ideologies that aim to define and establish the political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes. Just a note, the list of the equalities they supposedly "aim to establish" doesn't contain "legal equality", or "equality before the law". I sarcastically wonder why. Feminism holds the position that societies prioritize the male point of view and that women are treated unjustly in these societies. They "hold the position…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 06:52 AM
1

Demand safer working conditions. More safety equipment and procedures. More oversight. Unionize. Help protect men working Demand equal hiring practices As soon as you do one of these, feminists will tell you how wrong it is and how it hurts women.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 08:07 AM
1

No. It's wrong to criticize people for being trans, it's out of your control. Though it's ok to criticize people for their choices - like building a patriarchy and benefiting from it.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 07:10 AM
22

The question was So where exactly are those male privileges I have been promised?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 07:30 AM
2

There is a difference, I think. If he wasn't a jerk, it could be seen as "decent men can be abused too".
/r/MensRights31/07/23 05:26 AM
21

compare circumcision to cutting your fingernails There is a saying in Russian "сравнить хуй с пальцем", "compare a dick to a finger". It means comparing two incomparable things because they have a shared attribute. Now I know people do that literally.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:33 AM
28

They don't have nerve endings as well.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:27 AM
9

This and this scenes in "The Office" show an abusive girlfriend too.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:18 AM
1

In "The Office", Michael had an abusive relationship with Jan.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 03:56 AM
30

Blaming women for the patriachy (that men created and benefited from) Finally, we found the man who created and benefited from "the patriarchy". Why did you do this? What benefits did you get? How can you defend feminism if you are responsible for the "oppression" they fight against?
/r/MensRights29/07/23 05:10 AM
11

As soon as they destroy "the patriarchy", that won't be a problem anymore. Until then, please suffer in silence and let the professionals take care of you.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:14 PM
3

I came to that conclusion too. No one except feminists would benefit from "the patriarchy" if it existed.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:07 PM
1

Same argument. What genders have to do with stereotypes? It's not an argument, it's a question. There are many stereotypes related to people of certain genders, I mentioned a couple of examples. Would one of the males become a female? Would one of the females become a male? No to both. My question was "Do you think obediently following those stereotypes is a way to fight them?"
/r/MensRights26/07/23 06:57 AM
3

This post explains it really well
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:35 PM
0

I don't think genders have anything to do with responsibilities. They have a lot to do with stereotypes though, like "women must cook" or "men must protect".
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:30 PM
2

You don't make sense. The "responsibilities and duties" you're talking about are gender stereotypes. Do you think obediently following those stereotypes is a way to fight them?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 06:14 AM
6

According to Torah, gay people must be killed Do you think putting people in jail for killing gay people is antisemitism?
/r/MensRights23/07/23 09:19 AM
1

Feminists claim they advocate for men's rights too, but haven't done anything helpful in the last 100 years. Victim blaming, gaslighting and fighting windmills "the patriarchy" is not helpful. So, no, I don't believe feminism advocates for men's rights, just like I don't believe North Korea is a people's democratic republic.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 03:26 AM
31

It's beautiful. I've looked at this for five hours now
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:43 PM
2

I doubt she can give you something more than sex. If that's what you want and the price is fine, go for it.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 06:37 AM
15

What can be more systemic than discriminatory laws?
/r/MensRights18/07/23 05:56 AM
3

Are most Jewish people greedy? Are most women narcissists? Are most Muslims terrorists? Are most black people robbers?
/r/MensRights18/07/23 05:28 AM
8

In countries where conscription is a thing, conscripts don't have a right to move freely, to choose where they live, where they work, what they eat and so on. And if you're drafted, you lose all those rights and freedoms, and in addition, the right to live and to have your health protected (I've heard being shot at and seeing people die isn't very healthy). And by that I mean, you will be legally punished for trying to protect those rights.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 05:23 AM
3

Oh I know that one. I mentioned my trigger there once (being accused of something I haven't done), and multiple people immediately responded to me with... False accusations. Literally, they were telling me I must have r-d someone if I'm afraid of being falsely accused, after being told that it is overwhelmingly painful and scary for me.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 04:47 AM
1

The woman is talking to her mother, saying she is scared and she doesn't understand what is happening.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 10:05 PM
1

Also please point out which fallacies I am relying on here. Sure, let's start. First of all, if I said "These facts are a proof of a matriarchy in modern western societiy", I would be guilty of cherry picking. And, as you can see, I haven't said that. If I cherry picked other facts, I could "prove" in the same way that there is a secret lizard government, a patriarchy, a masson conspiracy, or that our universe was created by Flying Spaghetti Monster. And this is where you used it: I am sure most…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 11:50 AM
1

Literally this sub and almost every post in it, is about feminism and why its bad. This sub is literally about men's rights, you can read it in its description. Even though yes, feminism is as bad as any other ideology that segregates people by some attribute they didn't choose. It is fair to say all women, because they all had 0 choice in the matter. Just like men. The difference is women couldn't choose to get killed, while men can't choose to stay alive. My OP said it would be different. It d…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 06:41 AM
2

So you cannot possibly say this stuff is feminsts fault. Right? You see that right?? I've never said it was feminists' fault. you can not pin this on women. I believe every man and every woman is a unique human being, so I would never hold all women responsible for something some women do. What I said was: living in a matriarchy wouldn't be any different from living in modern western society. Why haven't you said anything about this? (Other than your whole comment that illustrates it): And most …
/r/MensRights05/07/23 05:51 AM
3

"As soon as communism is built, everything will be just fine. It's already on the doorstep, you just have to wait. Everything will be free, everything will be fun, you won't probably have to die at all." Yegor Letov - "Everything goes according to the plan" (Егор Летов - "Всё идёт по плану"), translated by me.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 05:20 AM
56

It means "treat women like they are human, and treat men like they are less than human"
/r/MensRights01/07/23 12:19 PM
6

I think they do it unconsciously, because it's easier to see oneself as a helpless victim, being controlled from outside and not being able to change anything - than to take responsibility over their own lives.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:58 AM
1

I can't agree with it, what do you think about these definitions from Wikipedia? Specifically the highlighted parts - I would say that's the fundamental difference between egalitarianism and feminism. Egalitarianism (from French égal 'equal'), or equalitarianism, is a school of thought within political philosophy that builds on the concept of social equality, prioritizing it for all people. Egalitarian doctrines are generally characterized by the idea that all humans are equal in fundamental wor…
/r/MensRights29/06/23 05:19 AM
2

When women have a problem, it's society's fault ... and men should take responsibility
/r/MensRights25/06/23 10:27 AM
3

Now imagine, how different the world would look if the world was a matriarchy. Would the world be different? Probably, it would be a world where women's lives, health and wellbeing are considered more important than men's. On a sinking ship, women would be saved first, along with children. In case of war, men would be forced to risk their lives and health to protect women. Vast majority of injuries and deaths in a dangerous workplace would be men. Genital mutilation of newborn girls would be con…
/r/MensRights25/06/23 09:54 AM
2

I'm an equality feminist. All feminists I met said they were for equality too. But at the same time they believe that modern society is built to oppress women and minorities (except men). From the article, quick search of the names you mentioned and your own comments I understood that: Equality feminists don't believe in "the patriarchy", "rape culture", "oppression of women", "toxic masculinity", "internalized misogyny" etc. Because of 1, equality feminists don't believe they have any reason to…
/r/MensRights25/06/23 08:03 AM
1

You forgot the first part of the definition Understandable, let's take a step back. Male supremacy is: a hateful ideology rooted in the belief of the innate superiority of cisgender men and their right to subjugate women, gays, trans men, and nonbinary people. That's the definition of male supremacy. That's not how I view all men, then I would be a misandrynist. I guess you mean you don't view all men as male supremacists, but that's not what I was saying. I mean, all explanations of feminism I …
/r/MensRights24/06/23 07:06 AM
2

the innate superiority of cisgender men and their right to subjugate women, gays, trans men, and nonbinary people. From my experience, this is exactly what feminists believe in. Meaning, feminism cannot make logical sense for someone who doesn't believe in male superiority. Of course, it's not necessarily true, but personally I haven't yet heard an explanation of feminism that wasn't based on the belief you're talking about.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 06:18 PM
5

I have yet to hear a single feminist even discuss the possibility of "Toxic Femininity" (Because apparently it doesn't exist or something...) They call it "internalized misogyny", and it says a lot.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 05:55 PM
2

It also implies that men are so incompetent that they can design infrastructure, create technology like computers, cell phones etc design and build skyscrapers but somehow we simply can not design nor implement a system which benefits men at the detriment of women? And at the same time, men are competent enough to build a system that doesn't leave any measurable trace and hasn't been defeated after more than 100 years of feminists fighting it.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 05:48 PM
7

Because of the loaded working title of your research, I guess. With a title like that, it looks like you aren't going to do actual research, because you believe you already know the conclusion. If the title was neutral ("Gendered Villanisation in Western Media" or something), you'd get less downvotes. Changing the name would also help you in being objective psychologically.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 06:11 AM
2

As a pacifist Russian, I've totally heard similar rhetoric from my war-supporting compatriots: "Anyone who is against the 'special military operation' (war) is a public enemy who hates their motherland or is brainwashed by NATO/US/Ukrainians".
/r/MensRights15/06/23 09:27 AM
1

Switching definitions. When they say "men", it can mean "adult male humans", "men and women in the government", "men and women who committed violent crimes", "men and women who are perceived as leaders", "men and women who hate women" and so on. Eventually, since they call all these different groups of people the same name they assume it's the same, so any adult male human is a violent sexist who controls the world.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:17 AM
0

One, I personally have not seen any femenist fight against gender neutral rape/DV laws. Have you heard about "believe all women"? Feminist fighting FOR women specific laws, does not mean they are fighting AGAINST gender nuetral. Fighting for "more gender-specific laws" means fighting against "less gender-specific laws".
/r/MensRights10/06/23 05:22 AM
7

So, you used to catch more STDs before the surgery?
/r/MensRights06/06/23 03:57 AM
30

"we fight for men's liberation from patriarchy too, so there is no need for a male rights movement" Feminism and similar ideologies are about fighting for the sake of fighting, not about winning or reaching any actual goals. Because while they are "fighting", any harm they do is justified in their heads. A Soviet joke: Communism is at the horizon. And horizon is an imaginary line that moves further from us when we move closer to it. To keep the fight going - and the harm justified - the "enemy" …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/23 05:55 AM
9

So, her friends gaslighted her
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/23 11:33 AM
8

"Nice guys" expect some sort of reward for helping others, good men help others just because it's a right thing to do.
/r/MenSupportMen18/05/23 05:47 AM
6

When men help each other, the response is usually "Not like that!"
/r/MensRights22/04/23 05:12 AM
1

she allegedly claims she has CPTSD from sexual abuse committed by me. I think I missed that initially, sorry. I thought she claims she already had CPTSD before she met you. Then she had sex with you to deal with random flashbacks. Later, as I thought, you unintentionally did something that triggered her so hard she switched to survival mode, associated you with her abuser from the past and hasn't still switched back. If she means you are actually the person who traumatized her, then I don't thin…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 02:21 PM
1

Thanks for the kind words, I'll try to explain it better. A dog that has been electrocuted (traumatized) after hearing a bell (trigger) for some time, it will eventually start to stress out (flashback) even if the bell isn't followed by electrocution, because it still expects to be electrocuted. From my experience, being eventually electrocuted after hearing the bell feels like the expected damage is already done, so there is no need to stress out anymore, it's not going to happen again for some…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 06:22 AM
5

As someone who was diagnosed with CPTSD, I think she may really have it. A glance is enough to cause a flashback for me if I'm already stressed, it does depend on the context though. Her desire to have sex makes sense too. If that's what she learned to expect after the trigger, having sex may make her feel like the thing she feared has finally happened and there's nothing to fear for now. Anyway, CPTSD doesn't excuse falsely accusing someone of a violent crime. It's not our fault we got traumati…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 04:38 PM
4

In reality I don’t fully disagree he just has such extreme views I argue the opposite because I disagree and don’t know how to argue from my own neutral perspective so I repeat things I’ve heard my friends say. It looks like your position is based on emotions and not logic. It's a natural thing and all humans behave like this, but it won't help you find any common ground with your partner. As far as I understand the mechanism of it, from your perspective you know that women are always getting it…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:49 AM
7

Hospitals, where newborn boys have their genitals mutilated, and the person who performs the surgery doesn't end up in prison. Military. Even in Israel, where women are conscripted too, they legally serve less time in less dangerous positions - and it's much easier for women to avoid being conscripted. Streets. Even though men are the vast majority of homeless people, the vast majority of shelters are for women.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 07:08 AM
6

Their idea of "harmonious relationship" is being "sufficiently antagonistic and distrustful", do I understand it right?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/04/23 04:57 AM
6

I have talked to some feminists and some Russian people who believe in propaganda, and I think I saw some similarities in their thought process. They don't try to challenge their own opinions. They try to justify the harm that is done by their ideology. Their enemy doesn't have a face. It's a group of people, "each one of them is also the victim but there's always some collateral damage". They claim they are following a beautiful goal, and it justifies pretty much everything for them. I guess, a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/23 12:18 PM
2

Miserable, thanks for asking. I can't find any reason to tolerate the suffering. I don't have any healthy ways to deal with the stress, and when the unhealthy mechanism kicks in, it makes me know that the only "healthy" way is being ready to suffer at any moment to save myself and close ones.
/r/MenSupportMen04/04/23 06:24 PM
1

Since I got married and immigrated (about 10 years ago), my mom started to bring up grandchildren in every conversation. I never understood why she did it, because my whole life I believed that children only make the parents' lives miserable. This January, I had a full scale posttraumatic flashback, which made me realize how abusive she was as a mother. She virtually stopped talking to me after I told her about the suffering she brought. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 06:19 AM
1

I don't think it's fine to generalize like that. I think my wife isn't abusive, though to be fair I'm sort of conditioned to not see abuse when I'm the target
/r/MensRights27/03/23 02:09 PM
15

"We need affirmative action because women were oppressed historically in the past". So, the goal won't be reached until humanity discovers time travel and changes the history.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 07:47 AM
1

When I read this: Misogyny is typically an unconscious hatred that men form early in life, often as a result of a trauma involving a female figure they trusted. An abusive or negligent mother, sister, teacher, or girlfriend can plant a seed deep down in their brain’s subcortical matter. I thought "am I unconsciously a misogynist?" But reading the checklist describing the total opposite of me was such a relief. It's nice to be validated.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 07:21 AM
1

Nothing, unless you think you haven't raped me
/r/MensRights25/03/23 02:22 PM
10

I believe men and women should be having a dialogue and not constantly fighting with eachother, there's no reason to be "at war", it's silly and nothing will get better from that. Agree so much. We are humans in the first place, and we should support each other instead of arguing who has it worse. I'm sure there are men you care about in your life, and it is a good enough reason for you to be in this sub.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 09:43 PM
1

Does your family know what you have done? Your colleagues? The police?
/r/MensRights23/03/23 05:48 PM
11

You have been holding me in your basement and using me as a sex slave for 10 years. I don't have any evidence, but it doesn't mean it's a false allegation. You need proof that I fabricated my claim, but it won't necessarily mean you haven't done it.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 07:34 AM
3

Advocating for equality is easier. Instead of saying "I support gay/straight rights", you can say "I support everyone's freedom to have sexual/romantic preferences". Instead of "I support men's/women's rights" - "I support equal rights for men and women".
/r/MensRights22/03/23 09:27 AM
3

I wish women (men too) knew that every man and every woman is a unique person with their own personality and experience. Most arguments feminists use contradict this simple fact. A homeless man doesn't benefit from being the same gender as his president. Dying in a war started by a man isn't less painful. Another important thing I wish people knew: men and women are not enemies.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 08:52 AM
3

Thank you for your support, and for pulling others out of misery
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/23 01:25 PM
5

That's a weird way of saying "it doesn't exist"
/r/MensRights16/03/23 12:43 PM
5

It's quite long, where exactly is the objective statistics about false accusations?
/r/MensRights16/03/23 12:39 PM
7

Have you found more sources of nonexistent data?
/r/MensRights16/03/23 12:15 PM
11

The closest we can get to an official figure for the number of false rape allegations is how many people were prosecuted for perverting the course of justice or wasting police time after making a rape claim. Undoubtedly, there will be other cases of false allegations being made where there was not enough evidence to bring a prosecution of wasting police time or perverting the course of justice. But we don’t have data to quantify this. Yep, the article literally confirms my point.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:59 AM
14

As far as I understand, objective statistics regarding false accusations can't exist at all. It is just logically impossible. But I might be wrong, can you explain how you got the data?
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:45 AM
12

How do you think she would benefit if it happened to her father, brother, husband, boyfriend, or any other man she cares about?
/r/MensRights16/03/23 09:31 AM
6

People attack you because they are assholes, it is not your fault. No matter how you look, you aren't "worthless", and you don't have to prove your worth to anyone. A weak person wouldn't have survived all this, and still stay brave enough to talk about it.
/r/MenSupportMen16/03/23 06:59 AM
4

You're actually making me feel better, thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/23 07:30 PM
2

curious of this sexist cunt's response if that mistake were made by a woman "Males forced a woman to work a minimum wage job, and even though she was so oppressed and scared, she did only one tiny mistake. Obviously, a filthy male wouldn't agree to work there, and even if one would leave his castle full of underage sex slaves to try working once in his life - he would use all the power he got as a minimum wage worker to keep oppression going." /s
/r/MensRights15/03/23 12:42 PM
3

Thanks for the validation. I am afraid that I will be completely defenseless if someone falsely accuses me. If it happens, the only hope for me is to be lucky enough to just lose my job and reputation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/23 08:51 AM
8

It's pretty natural for people with CPTSD to believe in weird things, and learning to distinguish between reality and illusion is important for us to function in society. Supporting "all men are bad" narrative does not only hurt men, it also stops women from getting healed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/23 07:23 AM
3

Thank you for your support! I know I shouldn't worry too much about pretty much anything, and I know I shouldn't care that much about other people's opinions. I'm working on it with a therapist. The people who attacked me, I can't call them anything, that's true. I think I didn't even put any blame on them in the post. But anyway, idiots or not, int that sub I'll only get the total opposite of support, and caring about myself comes first.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/23 03:46 PM
9

It was a bad joke, I don't really think supporting men means hating women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/23 12:10 PM
3

For the record, I have never been accused of anything worse than speeding. Anyway, thank you for your kind words. It really means a lot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/23 12:04 PM
11

Thanks, it looks really nice! I have a weird feeling about it being men-only, but logically it must be a working solution. I joined, hopefully it won't turn me into a woman hater or something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/23 11:46 AM
-4

As far as I know, Northern European countries have the most egalitarian laws. Check out Sweden and Finland
/r/MensRights13/03/23 06:15 PM
11

if your brain is working pretty much everything [contradicts the feminist narrative]. But if one's brain doesn't work, almost everything can be explained as patriarchal oppression ("men haven't really helped her, they just forced her to say they did"). Also, anything can be claimed to be irrelevant ("yes, some men helped her, but every other man didn't - and that's the real problem").
/r/MensRights12/03/23 05:53 AM
2

I started getting therapy when I was 28. I didn't do it earlier because I was sure that everyone feels the same way I do, but they are much better at overcoming and/or hiding it. Turned out not everyone has ADHD, not everyone has suicidal thoughts, and not everyone has to work hard to be accepted as a part of society. I think getting therapy is one of the best decisions I made in my life. I don't think calling my issue "toxic masculinity" is correct. I think "child neglect" is a) less abstract a…
/r/MensRights08/03/23 06:42 PM
-2

And then the taxes are spent on everyone... In some capacity
/r/MensRights08/03/23 05:24 PM
1

Yeah, sure
/r/MensRights26/02/23 01:52 PM
1

if russians are really destroying trains then they're much less obedient than any westerner I'm pretty sure there are more reasons Europeans don't destroy trains: A destroyed Russian military train means less casualties, a destroyed train with weapons for Ukraine means more casualties. Most people believe that less casualties is better. In democratic countries, citizens aren't punished for disagreeing with putin, so his supporters are a small minority. People who support the war don't have to hi…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 01:03 PM
1

War, repressions, isolation, imperialism, economical disaster, that kind of things
/r/MensRights26/02/23 12:00 PM
1

I see you are not familiar with Vladimir Soloviev (Владимир Соловьев) and Olga Skabeyeva (Ольга Скабеева)
/r/MensRights26/02/23 08:17 AM
2

No problem, I'm not a native speaker so I make such mistakes sometimes
/r/MensRights26/02/23 08:05 AM
1

No, I'm saying Russia is becoming the Soviet Union again
/r/MensRights26/02/23 05:37 AM
4

Then what do you think is the reason they are forced to stay?
/r/MensRights25/02/23 04:26 PM
33

Sorry, I see I wasn't clear. I meant, the joke portraits women as violent and unreasonable, which is pretty lame for that exact reason.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 02:54 PM
4

Russia is an authoritarian country This is true, and I believe it's the most important factor that makes people behave like that. You don't have to go to war as an Ukrainian I'm pretty sure it's not true. Draftable men aren't allowed to leave their home region so they can be mobilized any time.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 02:47 PM
24

The joke, it assumes women can't be reasoned with, and it's better to agree with them than to face the consequences of disagreeing
/r/MensRights25/02/23 02:33 PM
45

It also shows portraits women as violent and unreasonable (Edit: ambiguity)
/r/MensRights25/02/23 02:05 PM
2

As a Russian, I think the Soviet union was the biggest curse we got. And we're moving in that direction again, very fast.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 01:42 PM
6

They are literally brainwashed. The Russian propaganda demonizes Ukrainians and "the West", and whoever disagrees with it is punished. For example, yesterday more than 50 people were detained for displaying empathy to Ukrainians killed in the war. So it works like some sort of Stockholm syndrome: they know they are being abused, but doing anything about it is punishable, so they swallow any propaganda's take to shut up their conscience and self-preservation instinct. I'm quite interested in this…
/r/MensRights25/02/23 01:35 PM
1

I mean, same crimes should be punished equally, without taking in consideration genders of the criminal and the victim.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 02:21 PM
1

Remove all gendered laws on Earth. Genital mutilation is either legal or not. Healthy young people are either conscripted or not. Smart kids get grants, stupid kids don't.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 11:21 AM
3

It's logically impossible to prove that something doesn't exist (see Russell's teapot). So instead, you could try to make your opponents prove it does exist. But first, you should come to a strong definition of "the patriarchy" - otherwise it will change every time your opponent opens their mouth. How many people are members of the patriarchy? How many were there 20 years ago? What are their names? Is it designed to benefit men? How did it benefit men in last 20 years? Does it have any political…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:55 AM
1

Blaming the victim. Does being abused by another man feel better than being abused by a woman? I would ask them what they mean by "toxic masculinity". Then I would enough questions to track where does this "toxic masculinity" come from (or enough questions to be called an incel). I think eventually the answer will be something like "other men are responsible for it" - which is victim blaming again. Most "points" like that assume that men are a monolith, or a hive mind, and every man is responsib…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 06:55 AM
2

I don't see anything rude in your comments, you make perfect sense
/r/MensRights12/02/23 06:32 AM
1

I might be wrong, my opinion isn't based on dating experience. I have been having favorable time with one woman for more than 10 years.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 06:27 AM
1

"i love to be mean to men" I think they mean being dominant in bed. No problem with that, if it's consensual.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 06:11 AM
2

I explain things in simple words to show my line of thought, so it is easier for my opponent to see my mistake if there is one.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 06:04 AM
1

"Down with the sickness" by Disturbed is my favourite
/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:53 AM
1

Double standards. If a man acts immature, it's his own fault. If a woman acts immature, it's because "the patriarchy" brainwashed her, so it's not her fault.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:21 AM
6

Conscription. In most countries, specifically men are required by law to serve in the military for some time. It basically means you have to follow someone else's orders about 24/7 in an unhealthy and dangerous environment against your will, just for being male. Genital mutilation, aka performing an unnecessary traumatic surgery on newborn's genitals that results in significant sensitivity loss. It's illegal if the newborn is female, but for males it is not only tolerated, but often encouraged. …
/r/MensRights04/02/23 03:03 PM
1

Your comment a good illustration for what I said
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 07:51 PM
1

Please think about your response to empathy when you feel safe
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 10:05 AM
1

I'm sorry it happened to you, you had a traumatizing childhood. Don't take it wrong, but mother's presence doesn't necessarily equal happy childhood. Even if she only means good.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 09:09 AM
2

You are very angry. Child's love to their parents is one of the most basic human instincts, and it's completely natural to be protective in your position. It's important to remember that this instinct can significantly affect one's judgement though
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 08:30 AM
1

It's understandable if you feel that way, and it's understandable if you want to justify this behavior. I'm not saying it's good, but it's understandable.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 08:20 AM
1

It's ok to feel that way. Deciding to get therapy requires courage and strength. Your denial is understandable, try thinking about it when you feel safe.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 08:11 AM
1

I'm still not a therapist. I'm not qualified to help you, and I wouldn't do it for free if I was
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 06:16 AM
1

I'm not a therapist
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 05:34 AM
3

Unfortunately, it's not as easy as it could look. Our people were punished for speaking up for generations. They are afraid. They don't want to support the war. They want to find any excuse not to oppose it. Propaganda works surprisingly well, if it's combined with repressions. I hope it makes sense. I'm not saying it's a right thing to do, fear is not an excuse for supporting war crimes I'm really sorry for all the death and suffering that happens under the Russian flag. And I'm sorry I didn't …
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 05:08 PM
3

Some moms get more love than they deserve
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 11:18 AM
2

Calling me an asshole isn't abusive, right? I'm not your mother maybe ASK for their intentions instead of assuming, you genius. I'm not your therapist
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 11:09 AM
0

Making children feel highly overrated is abuse. Intended or not, as a joke or with a serious face
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 11:08 AM
4

Yes, there are plenty of assholes who think it's funny. 680 people agreed that she is "impressive" They think making fun of children while abusing them excuses the abuser. I'm not sure what their intentions are, probably they have experience of abusing someone and it helps them to cope with guilt - or the other way around, they were abused by someone they love, and they want to find excuses for their abusers.
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 10:53 AM
1

No, you guess wrong. If you feel guilty for abusing someone, try to tell them you're sorry instead of convincing yourself that you haven't done anything wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 10:40 AM
2

I hope there is someone to help you. Virtualhug.gif
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 08:40 AM
2

I strongly recommend you getting therapy and developing healthier coping mechanisms than this
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 05:55 AM
0

The fact that people normalize and encourage child abuse is the worst part
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 09:04 PM
6

It's very important to not base your self image on their opinion
/r/MensRights21/01/23 05:37 PM
4

I saw it in Fuck you in particular
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 05:27 PM
3

What do you mean "act like mothers"? Like, give birth to children?
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 05:25 PM
6

It can be seen as brigading attempt, I'm not sure it's allowed by the sub rules
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 05:12 PM
6

You know who else isn't abusive? Your mom. It's a joke too.
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 04:17 PM
9

Do you think I should have written "abusive and funny"?
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 04:13 PM
11

Thank you for your support. Everyone gets hurt in some way, I hope we will be healed once.
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 03:33 PM
26

I wish I had to imagine it
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 03:20 PM
19

Maybe, that's probably the reason 680 people agreed that she is "impressive". Perfectly natural reaction to a bad joke.
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 02:42 PM
10

You guys never met a Russian mother JK, any mother can be good or bad
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 02:13 PM
10

I don't know the context for neither case. I don't even know who Bill Burr is. Did he mean his daughters when he said that? Anyway, it doesn't matter if it was a joke or not. Making your children feel "overrated" affects them a lot. We don't know what exactly happened there. I'm quite sensitive on this topic, so yes, maybe I am overreacting.
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 02:11 PM
14

Spoilers!
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 01:29 PM
20

It's probably because men's mental health is a joke
/r/AntiFeminists21/01/23 01:25 PM
11

You shouldn't be sorry for something that isn't your fault. Thanks for your empathy, it means a lot.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 12:16 PM
20

men started all wars I love this one because it's both false (queens started more wars per monarch than kings) and immoral (blaming the victim)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/23 10:24 AM
2

It can't be done without violence, so no
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/23 11:15 AM
133

Also: Using makeup and plastic surgery is forced on women by men. If you find a natural looking woman hotter, you're dangerous.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/23 04:52 PM
5

The second link is in Hebrew, I'm talking about paragraph 36א: זיכוי לאשה (תיקון מס' 108) תשנ"ו-1996 36א. בחישוב המס של אשה תובא בחשבון 1/2 נקודת זיכוי. Upd: It means, when paying the income tax, a woman legally pays 1410 shekels per year less, compared to a man if other conditions (children, disabilities, repatriation status etc.) are equal. The first one is in English. You can see how many times it is different for men and women, and who is privileged in each case (>! It's women !<)
/r/MensRights12/01/23 04:54 AM
9

I mean, it's literally written in the law. Here in Israel, it's at least in IDF service law and Income taxation law.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 04:38 AM
45

ps. privilege is often invisible to those who have it. if you are male, it will take deliberate effort to understand what male privilege is. just like if you are white, ablebodied, rich etc. So, male privilege is invisible (as in unmeasurable) but existing, and female privilege is visible but it doesn't exist - right?
/r/MensRights11/01/23 04:09 AM
7

How many men and women are killed in each of these countries per year/month/day? How many boys and girls have their genitals mutilated without consent? How many die from suicide?
/r/MensRights28/12/22 09:18 AM
5

No, there is definitely plenty of areas where women are treated worse. Any examples?
/r/MensRights28/12/22 08:24 AM
2

That's how conspiracy theories work. The theorist "knows" they're right, so everyone who doesn't agree with them must be a part of the conspiracy.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/22 06:20 AM
1

"you should see my tits for just $0.99 per month"
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 08:48 AM
8

I grew up in a country with male-only conscription-based army, and I've heard hundreds of times that service is the only way to "become a man".
/r/MensRights17/12/22 06:11 PM
2

Nah, feminism is discriminatory by design
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 12:02 PM
2

What exactly has feminism done that helped men with the issues you mentioned?
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:52 PM
9

"Oleg, Oleg, blyat, I told you, Oleg, blyat, don't provoke her, Oleg, walk away, walk away, walk away"
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/22 06:04 AM
3

The guy's name is Oleg
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/22 06:02 AM
4

Approximately
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/22 03:46 PM
4

Did they mention exactly how many people think like that? Do such people exist outside their head?
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 06:38 AM
2

If right questions are asked, they eventually come to conclusion that the victim deserves it for being born male (or call their opponent an incel and leave). Same goes for conscription, suicide, homelessness etc, but MGM is the best example - it's about literal newborn babies who haven't even had a chance to do something right or wrong in their life.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 08:20 AM
10

I don't believe a newborn baby can perform an unnecessary surgery on their own genitalia, and I don't believe that being killed by a man feels better than being killed by a woman
/r/MensRights04/12/22 11:13 AM
5

Yeah, trying to replace one's mother isn't probably going to work, but they make it look like terror is the only other option
/r/AntiFeminists03/12/22 11:23 AM
5

r/technicallythetruth
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/22 07:02 AM
9

There are (probably) more Queen fans than Iron Maiden fans, because their music is different
/r/AntiFeminists02/12/22 11:44 AM
4

I think your question is legitimate, and it doesn't deserve to be downvoted, no matter who you are and what you believe.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 07:55 AM
16

I don't discriminate, feminist men are just as bad as feminist women.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 07:17 PM
1

She should stop dating leopards and switch to humans.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 02:05 PM
6

If we're talking about a man and a woman with same education, experience, confidence, physical and mental health state, working same hours on the same position in the same company - it's probably unfair to pay one of them less.
/r/AntiFeminists23/11/22 09:26 AM
51

Isn't it misogyny to be unhappy with decisions women make in their lives?
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/22 03:45 PM
3

It always feels good when a feminist admits that their only motivation is hating men.
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/22 06:30 AM
2

Sorry for the misunderstanding and have the best day!
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/22 10:00 AM
2

I'm pretty sure I'd get more protective if a woman was slapped too, and I believe it's because women are wonderful. Though I think it would be wise to look at her reaction to understand if it was a friendly slap or an assault before getting violent. Maybe I’m missing some outlier information that changes the situation, sure, but I’ll make judgement now and allow new information to change my mind later. This makes you really different from regular modern feminists. If you agree that gender is not…
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/22 09:51 AM
2

That's exactly what I'm talking about. Instead of asking if the slapper and the slapped are married, or if the slapper has any authority over the slapped, or if they are close friends and such a behavior is ok for them - you choose to not see anything other than genders.
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/22 08:27 AM
2

I don't agree that genders are inherently different - instead I would say individuals are different, and one's gender is just one of thousands of factors that define their personality and experience, and not even a relevant one in most cases. For example, education, age, health state, place of birth, work experience are much more relevant factors to consider when comparing the salaries of two individuals working in the same positions.
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/22 07:25 AM
–

Submitted. Are you going to publish the results?
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/22 07:05 AM
2

Feminism is defined by prioritizing women over men. If equality was its purpose, feminists would fight themselves.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/22 04:59 AM
25

Literally 1984 Not figuratively
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 06:59 PM
1

You weren't even making much sense for a feminist. I wish I could talk about "toxic masculinity" with you, but I have questions about the topic, and I need them answered. I can't even know if it exists if I don't know what it is. I'll leave you here with your topic, until I get my answers from some other feminist. Who knows, maybe it will happen?
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 06:53 PM
1

I understand everything you say, but it isn't related to any of my questions. The only thing that looked like a honest try to answer my question was revoked because "you didn't technically say prejudice". I'm not capable of discussing anything with an opponent that refuses to answer my questions.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 06:28 PM
1

I don't know your points, and I tried to understand them. I have asked you 5 questions, and you haven't answered even one. Well, you have, but you misunderstood it (why - was I not explicit enough? did I use wrong tense? was the question too long? too many technical terms? does it sound awkward for a native speaker?), so I have zero information about your points.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 06:04 PM
1

Did you read my questions before answering them?
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 05:31 PM
1

I'm just trying to understand what you meant, because honestly "prejudice based on data" doesn't make more sense to me than "defensive invasion" or "triangular sphere". I'm not a native English speaker, so I checked if I understand what prejudice means correctly: The act or state of holding unreasonable preconceived judgments or convictions. An adverse judgment or opinion formed unfairly or without knowledge of the facts. Irrational suspicion or hatred of a particular social group, such as a rac…
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 04:54 PM
1

Yes please, but I would ask for examples of prejudice against other groups - people of certain races, sexual preferences, religious beliefs, place of birth - that is based on data.
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 04:15 PM
1

Could you explain it a little more? I always thought that prejudice is based on stereotypes, not objective data about the victim - do I misunderstand the word? Are there any other examples of such prejudice based on data?
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 04:07 PM
6

So, it's basically prejudice
/r/AntiFeminists16/11/22 06:37 AM
12

Just go there and be professional. They can write whatever they can, but the actual money you'll make for the company is supposed to be much more important to them.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 04:12 PM
7

Vast majority of recruiters I've worked with were women too. If we're not biased (and we could check some statistics to be sure, LinkedIn looks like a good place to look) - then most people responsible for the gender ratio at the workplace are women. It doesn't mean anything to me - "HR is HR, candidate is candidate, rejection is rejection", no matter what gender they are. But feminists tend to actively not care if you are the same gender as the person who hurts you, so I guess after seeing the …
/r/MensRights15/11/22 01:39 PM
6

I think it's actually called "against men's rights"
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 01:05 PM
5

Russian women can be drafted as medics or nurses if they have medical education. Russian men can be drafted as cannon fodder if they have enough arms to hold a rifle.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 04:58 AM
16

It's a translation mistake, the children were having daytime nap ("sleep hour"): Дети спали, был сончас.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 04:27 AM
11

When you finish your laughing, could you provide the numbers for each of the factors you mentioned, so I can laugh too?
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/22 06:37 PM
4

But is it irrational to believe something that you have always been taught, and has been an enforced idea in every aspect of your life since you were a child? 100% yes. It's natural, understandable, damaging and unfair, but it's irrational, because it doesn't represent the real world. Don't get it wrong, I'm not saying it's not important and I'm not blaming anyone for having childhood trauma. It's not their fault they have it, and I imagine that being afraid of every second person on Earth must …
/r/MensRights13/11/22 06:50 AM
-1

Due to the differences in men and women, women definitely experience, higher instances of fear for their lives, as they look to protect their young children for example against potential men who are definitely stronger than them. It's still irrational fear, and therapist is still the exact person who can help to fix it. What is the nuance?
/r/MensRights13/11/22 04:31 AM
77

Anyone who irrationally fears for their lives, should see a therapist. It can't be fixed otherwise.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 05:46 PM
9

When a woman lives with her mother, it's not her fault. "The patriarchy" didn't let her get education and find a well-paying job, and it makes her mother suffer too. Show some empathy. When a man lives with his mother, it is his fault. He had the advantage of being the same gender as 3 most successful people, but he chose to oppress his mother instead of showing some empathy to her. /s obviously
/r/MensRights12/11/22 09:00 AM
1

In case you eventually decide to answer, here is another "one": Has feminism achieved any results in dismantling the patriarchy at all? How many people involved in oppressing women have been exposed and punished for their crimes, and how many are still free? What techniques can be used to estimate these numbers?
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/22 08:42 AM
1

I'd like to take this one, real feminists usually can't answer my questions: There are way too few women in fields like engineering and law, which is a problem. How many women haven't become engineers because of the patriarchy, and how many by their own will? Would you say the problem is solved if random women were forced to become engineers or lawyers at gunpoint until the gender ratio is good enough?
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/22 06:20 AM
5

Unless you're into pegging
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/22 05:34 AM
1

Thanks for your corrections, I really appreciate them. Technically Patriarchy is not an entity (like God) it is a system. Yes, and religions assume some sort of system too. Christianity is a complex system with a set of rules, but there is no way to objectively see them work. The common thing is that the whole system only makes sense to someone who believes that it makes sense. You are right that Patriarchy cannot be physically found (like God) [but there are many examples of women being treated…
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/22 10:34 AM
3

What examples from history can you name, when some groups of people were considered unfairly privileged just for having some attribute they never chose, and it ended well? The goal of feminism is presumably a society that treats men and women equally, but feminism itself assumes that men and women aren't equal. Does it mean that every feminist in a society is an obstacle to achieving feminism's goal - or that feminism's goal isn't equality? If any man is more privileged than any woman "by defini…
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/22 10:34 PM
12

Exactly. Feminists believe that: There is a super powerful entity ("the patriarchy") that controls everything in the world. It can't be found using any scientific methods, including the most advanced technology and the most complex calculations. Behaving in a certain way may affect the Entity's decisions. However, no effect of this behavior is guaranteed. The Entity will never stop existing.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/22 05:10 AM
33

Why are most comments deleted in the original post?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/22 06:35 PM
1

If they really fight for it, there has to be some documented evidence, that answers some of these questions: What actions were taken? Who did it - and how are they related to feminism? What was the plan? What effect was expected? What actually happened? Normally, the best way to get evidence that supports someone's claim is to ask them. But we're talking about feminists here, so you're probably will only get answers like "it's just everywhere", "just google it" or some unrelated news article. At…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 12:23 PM
3

To not be considered second class citizens, we should unite with people who consider us second class citizens. Makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 11:21 AM
4

In the end, the guy's friend says "Blyat, Oleg, I told you not to provoke her... Just go away", or something like this.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/22 04:49 AM
10

Women do end up at top level positions if they really fight for it - just like men, but with better chances. If instead of fighting they blame "the patriarchy", they end up in circlejerk feminist communities.
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/22 07:52 AM
3

I think you should ask him all these questions. Be prepared that you won't like some of his answers, accepting them is the best thing you can do. As the other guys said, if you care about him enough to post your questions here, you're probably already fine.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 08:58 AM
22

What has she done to the cats? Each of them lost 2 lives
/r/AntiFeminists04/10/22 12:38 PM
2

Religion
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/22 04:18 PM
13

As a married man, yes, I'm being called incel amusingly often.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 05:47 AM
16

I see him as staff
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 05:30 AM
30

Imagine how many feminists would claim they were raped by a voice assistant
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 05:28 AM
0

If we're talking about the subs themselves, and not the subscribers, I think comparing their rules is the most objective criteria we can research. In Men's Rights sub, both misogyny and misandry are prohibited, and an explanation is provided. In feminism sub, misogyny is prohibited, and opposing or questioning feminism is explicitly prohibited too. If we're talking about the subscribers, there is a catch 22: being a feminist implies holding (yesall)men responsible for any kind of sexism, if not …
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/22 05:07 AM
0

If she knows she's been brainwashed, she should get therapy as soon as possible and fix it. Until then, she knowingly works for "the patriarchy" and promotes "toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights01/10/22 04:51 AM
1

But a man can have sex with another man
/r/AntiFeminists30/09/22 05:06 AM
2

So, men's right to not be murdered is as protected as women's right to not be underpaid. Basically what I said.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/22 05:55 AM
-1

That's why it's a bad analogy?
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/22 01:09 PM
1

I don't know, something like "Criticizing something should start with understanding how it works"?
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/22 09:25 AM
2

Slowly and gently
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/22 09:05 AM
1

Of course it doesn't happen every time. Some victims choose not to call the police, thus helping the criminal to stay free and commit more crimes. Sometimes there is no evidence of a crime. Sometimes the court can be bribed.
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/22 06:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter