TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

desbest Archive

View 7 posts and 183 comments by desbest on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Has anyone noticed how of all the photos they could have chosen of the woman, they chose the most male-centric one? I wonder why they chose that photo. I can't imagine why! Dark background and high exposure (of the camera lens settings) Smiling Relaxed eyes Transfixed gaze Wearing makeup (foundation and eyeliner) Close-up shot (her face takes up the entire height of the photo) Direct light source is directly pointed at her face (to accentuate her from the background) Shoulders arched forwards (t…
/r/MensRights06/08/22 01:11 PM
2

They don't need to kill lesbian women (like they do gay men) in sharia law countries because they can just do corrective rape to convert them into changing into a heterosexual woman.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 11:21 AM
4

Feminists in the UK introduced a law called the Violent Offending Disclosure Scheme and the Sex Offenders Disclosure Scheme. Feminists claimed this new law would help prevent domestic violence, domestic abuse and sex crime by letting women know who the dangerous and potentially risky men are before they enter a relationship with them. It was put in when self declared feminist Theresa May was prime minister. They are nicknamed Claire's Law and Megan's Law. Before in the UK a person would need to …
/r/MensRights09/04/22 07:25 PM
1

The contradictions in feminism are astounding One Women should be allowed to breastfeed in public like on public transport and restaurants. Breasts are natural and are not reproductive organs. It's just like school teachers policing girls dress attire. Men insert a sexual context into the most innocent situations. Stop sexualising women's bodies. Look at me on Tiktok showing cleavage with my boobs out while twerking to sexual songs like Nicki Minaj Anaconda or Cardi B WAP while doing the ahageo …
/r/MensRights14/03/22 03:22 PM
1

gab and poal.co
/r/MensRights26/02/22 01:41 AM
19

That's because pharmaceutical drugs were invented in World War Two and millions of men were going to die anyway, so why not use them for drug trials?
/r/MensRights25/10/21 02:57 PM
1

Let's put it this way. An 18 year old woman cannot talk to strangers online on video using Omegle or Chat Roulette without some man doing indecent exposure to show his dick. However an 18 year old black man can talk to strangers (including white women) on video using Omegle or Chat Roulette without having to worry about experiencing racist language, violence, and theft associated behaviours like stalking, threats, doxxing and hacking.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 12:55 PM
1

Because there's a thing called "male entitlement" where if a woman rejects a sexual or romantic preposition from a man, that the man is likely to become abusive towards her. That abuse could be verbal, phycological, physical, sexual, financial, cyberbullying, trolling, stalking etc. I expect someone to say that those crime statistics that feminists quote, that they only happen to a starkly small percentage of women, so they're not representative of the typical female experience (if not then stat…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:05 PM
3

Crown Prosecution Service. When a british person is arrested it is the CPS who decides if they should be charged with a crime.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 04:50 AM
8

He only got cleared because he taught at Eton and had a prestigious education. His social status and connections helped him.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:39 PM
2

Gab stopped using mastodon because the protocol that powered the fediverse maston uses, ActivityPub, it doesn't scale. Gab has millions of users and ActivityPub was breaking their website causing speed, hacking, downtime and performance problems. He explains why on video here. The open source contributions when Gab was open source ended up getting implemented in Soapbox which is an interface for Pleroma.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 01:06 AM
2

"reddit has become very monetised" Women control the majority of spending decisions worldwide. Also 3/4 or 75% of all purchases are made by women. Why would a company cater to everyone or men, if they can cater to women and get 300% more profits? That's a huge leap in profits.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 12:58 AM
2

Ruqqus isn't a freedom of speech website. They do censor even if they provide more free reign than reddit. The only difference is that reddit's moderation rules is honest and the line is clear so everyone knows what you can and can't say, but Ruqqus lies and blurs the line so not only is it hard to know what can't be said, you can also be punished for things that in the spirit and the letter of the rules don't actually break the rules. There are multiple allegations of Ruqqus censorship online. …
/r/MensRights05/08/21 12:35 AM
1

Disillusioned by the reality you've been fooled into believing was REAL So someone somewhere is teaching the general public what "the definitive reality" is. What is the definitive reality taught by? The dominant culture. Who makes up the dominant culture? The mainstream media, Hollywood, the schools, academia and the government. So how can you be red pill if you're sprouting the talking points of the dominant culture? If you was doing that, then you wouldn't be rejecting and providing counter-a…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 06:54 PM
1

Women can’t be red pill because you can’t be the counter-culture and the dominant culture at the same time. To be red pill by definition you have to be heretical and an iconoclast. Content that is women’s interest gets published, promoted and praised, while men’s interest is overlooked, ignored, demoted and deplatformed.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 02:46 PM
1

So when a rape allegation happens, feminists, feminist media, feminist charities, documentaries, charities getting scriptwriters to remove false rape allegations from tv dramas, universities and schools say tell everyone especially men to "always believe women and trust women because false rape allegations are really rare like 0.1% or 1-3%", but when a man contacts a male domestic abuse helpline the charity is instructed to not believe all men at face value that claim they are domestic abuse vic…
/r/MensRights12/07/21 01:05 AM
2

court psychologist male abuse helpline You shouldn't expect a psychologist and charity helpline to fully understand the law. When they told you that you can't use covert audio recordings in court as evidence the person is wrong and is either lying, naive, misled or ignorant. Most people who work for charities or offer free legal advice are low paid, badly educated, lacking reading and writing skills and badly trained, so it's common they often fail to understand the law and make fundamental mist…
/r/MensRights12/07/21 12:54 AM
1

You'd be surprised about the sex-negative feminists who want to ban consensual sexually suggestive imagery, like glamour modelling, for example Page 3, lads mags, F1 grid girls, booth babes at gaming and anime conferences.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 05:19 PM
1

Feminists believe that all consensual sex between men and women is rape, because women would not consent to sex with men, if men didn't pressure, seduce and manipulate women into doing it.
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/21 02:51 PM
1

Because she's an INFLUENCER aka an entertainer. Whether that's a model, sex worker, twitch streamer or political commentator, so she's using manufactured controversy over a petty and trivial issue most people wouldn't bat an eyelid at, such as "consensual sex between two adults with one being a celebrity that it's predatory", as a publicity stunt to boost her INFLUENCER career.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/21 04:35 PM
1

The Guardian is a feminist newspaper. You shouldn't be surprised. Because The Guardian is also bipolar as they contradict themselves countless times in lots of articles, they do sometimes have articles on MRA issues, even if not expressed from a gynocentric perspective, but it's RARE, but at least then they can claim they're balanced because they covered the other side.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/21 02:02 PM
3

In India it's legally classed as rape for a man to have consensual sex with a woman on the basis that he promised to marry her, and then refuse to fulfill his promise of marrying her. That's how rape by fraud works in India. I'm sure you can imagine the potential for abuse this law causes and has caused.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/21 01:55 PM
6

Regarding the dating market, women don't just compete themselves "FOR men" to get desirable men, they also have inter-personal competition where women compete with EACH OTHER to eliminate their same-sex (female) competition. Only women do this, men don't. Women are always responsible for the majority of slut shaming, policing what other women wear, denying men consensual sexual outlets like porn, prostitution, mail order brides and sexualised imagery in the media which also eliminate their femal…
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/21 01:47 PM
2

Yes. They also banned the words incel, cuck and virgin. https://www.theverge.com/2020/12/16/22179256/twitch-bans-simp-virgin-incel-new-sexual-harassment-policy
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:04 AM
4

Because of #metoo expanding the definition of sexual harassment compared to 15 years ago to absurd and excessive levels, and feminism which aims to remove women's accountability for their actions which then gives women higher relative power than men, the following things will happen once Tinder gets a "social credit" score. This is a #metoo moment goldmine! It'll also grow the manosphere by making men more aware of how feminism really works instead of just listening to the feminist mainstream me…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/21 12:54 AM
2

Girls are social creatures who not only want to follow the crowd of what's hip and trendy "woke progressive liberal issues that corporations use in their adverts", they also want to be a unique and rebel against society (like their parents, media, school teachers and church) to express their individuality. Also it's harder to debate politics with women because men think logically and women think emotionally. As women get more emotionally involved and are more sensitive, empathetic and neurotic t…
/r/askTRP16/03/21 04:53 PM
1

I did not deny that women go on dates with men using Tinder. When I made my generalisation, I was talking figuratively, not literally. I was also not talking in absolutes. You interpreted what I said to mean "all women" to then say "not all women are like that" because "lots of men have dates with women thanks to tinder". Of course I never meant all women, I meant a significant amount. I do acknowledge that men have had dates (and even relationships) with women thanks to Tinder. I am not disputi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/21 01:47 AM
1

I only commented on this thread because it appeared in my feed on the reddit home page. I'm not a regular reader of this subreddit. Your assumption is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/21 01:15 AM
2

It's the 2020's not the 1990s or 1980s. We have online video streaming, broadband, millions of ebooks to download, social networks and millions of blogs and forums online. Technology has advanced far enough for there to be enough information on the internet, for men to know "what not to do".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/21 01:11 AM
1

I think we live in a different country.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 12:55 PM
1

A man communicating with a woman after being told to stop speaking to her isn't sexual harassment, it's stalking. It's a stalking crime, not a sex crime. Stalking is outside the scope of my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 12:51 PM
1

Because you are saying you'll only be offended if the action continues after you ask the person to stop. This implies that men have a free pass to do it and they can hope you'll allow it by not asking them to stop. So you'll allow it if you find the man is attractive. This is not representative of most women, as most women would be offended the first time it happens with a person, unlike you. It's also illegal the first time it happens, repeating it after being asked to stop doesn't make it any …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 12:40 PM
1

I would be offended by unwelcome touching. So you're only offended if they don't stop when asked? You would be encouraging men to do it. That's a sex crime and men can get a criminal record for touching a woman without their consent. In the UK a man got a criminal record as a sex offender because he cold approached a woman and touched her arm and waist, even though it was brief and a light tap. Most women would be offended by this. I now think your opinions are not representative of most women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 12:34 PM
-1

But if you consider the #metoo version of sexual harassment, where the definition has been expanded compared to 15 years ago Staring at someone Catcalling or cold approaching in countries where it's legal Using pet names like baby, dear or honey Giving a woman a compliment that is not a veiled chat up line Sending someone these emojis 😍😻💋😘🥰 And more Only women would be offended by this, men wouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 12:20 PM
1

I didn't say all women do this, but a significant amount do.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 12:12 PM
2

Your trolling attempt failed.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 04:44 AM
5

Because they want attention and male validation. They have no intention of dating anyone. Also the best way for a man to upset a woman without getting arrested is to sexually harass her. Women know sexual harassment is less severe for men and they'd probably enjoy it. So for a woman the best way she can upset a man is to breadcrumb him, be a cocktease and waste his time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 04:22 AM
3

I think you're wrong, because you have failed to consider that women tend to be more flexible than men in regards to changing their standards. When a man relies on looks on choosing women, he judges each woman on its own merits. But women don't judge men entirely on their own merits. Women's standards fluctuate unlike men's. Women tend to have gain lower or higher standards based on environmental factors. And I'm talking about staying in the same country. Women do not judge a man's attractivenes…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/21 12:03 AM
2

A lot of non-sexual behaviour stems from sexual behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/21 03:20 PM
1

Promiscuity is good as I love having sex with multiple women because it feels good. I'm part of the polyamory community. And I have a fetish for having sex with multiple women and every single woman I find attractive, which is over 90% of women. I have a high sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 02:26 PM
2

Another point not previously mentioned, male privilege isn't real, female privilege is real. And men are the disposable sex as women have more agency than men in society, which manifests itself in lots of different scenarios. So men value women more than women value men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/21 10:56 PM
6

Once it becomes widely apparent that most women are not going to get their high tier Chads, they will set their sights on Baby Chads and other low tier alphas, eventually moving on to high tier betas, and so forth. Those men on the other hand, now flooded with a kind of attention not known before, will become increasingly alert and will opt to wait, rather than buy in. I disagree with your thread. No they won't. Women won't settle or lower their standards because of the shortage of high value me…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/21 03:47 PM
1

Yes I know women find rape traumatic, but I was talking about consensual sex. You've not explained why women don't enjoy consensual sex, you just conflated it with rape and women getting pregnant without their consent. You mis-read my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/21 01:13 PM
1

What does abortion have to do with whether you enjoy sex? What does the threat of rape have to do with never being able to enjoy sex? Women still can enjoy sex if they consent. You've not explained why casual sex is degrading, not pleasurable and not validating to women. You've made zero arguments, just assertions.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 09:41 PM
1

This is just another way of women saying that they don't find most men attractive so their easy access to sex doesn't matter to them because they rarely find anyone worth having sex with. But still women's easy access to sex is STILL a privilege no matter how much you deny it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/21 06:27 PM
2

"Women have a right to..." Who is saying they don't? Nobody is saying that women should have sex with men they don't feel attracted to, to lower their standards, or that there should be state sanctioned girlfriends. You'd be hard pressed to find someone who is pro-rape. When feminists complain about male privilege like men dominating STEM fields, I'm sure they're not saying that men should be banned from STEM. Men and women's issues in society stem from lack of agency and social bias, rather tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 04:32 PM
3

But if men were in the same situation as women, they wouldn't be behaving the same as women. Women have higher standards than men and they want less sexual partners than men and they hate being catcalled or cold approached due to feminism. Also sex is physical for men but mental for women. Women don't have sex unless they are seduced psychologically, feeling tingles or chemistry. Men would be having more sexual partners, enjoying being catcalled or cold approached, dating people of lower standar…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 02:12 AM
2

I wouldn't trust the opinions of the "rate my looks" subreddits at face value. Some give people a false sense of self-worth by giving people inflated ratings in order to make everyone feel good, even if a person isn't attractive. And some of them are run by incels who give women harsher ratings to reduce their self-esteem and mating potential. And people who give high ratings to attractive women have their comments removed and they are banned from the subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/21 08:03 PM
0

Looksmatch is an oxymoron because ugly and plain/average looking women tend to date men who are much more attractive than them, whereas the threshold of attractiveness needed for a man to date a woman of equal attraction is much higher. When you factor in people choosing who to date based on social status, the disparity increases. If you put 100 men and 100 women in a room assuming we have a balanced sample size, women will have more suitors, higher quality suitors, and a much easier effort to e…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/21 07:46 PM
2

You sound like a privilege denialist. There is lots of anecdotal, social experiment, surveys and group statistics that can prove me correct. Also if you're an attractive woman you can match with 90+% of men on Tinder, but attractive men don't match with 90+% of women. http://archive.is/LtJS8 https://archive.is/rJK8c
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/21 06:47 AM
8

Women have higher standards than men, which makes it harder for men to enter relationships than it is for women. So obviously women will have more agency in dating to be able to extract more utility from a relationship or suitor, as they're in a bargaining position.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 09:27 PM
5

Because women are solipsists when it comes to intergender dynamics and seduction. Women expect the same things that they do to attract and be more appealing to men, to also work for men as well. They fail to see the other person's perspective, because they have never had to take the social role of initiating, so they have no reference point from their own lives that they can draw from and compare with. Another thing to consider, sex is physical for men and mental for women. For a woman to have s…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 09:24 PM
1

Does the "I was forced to commit crime" defence actually work in a court of law in the UK? Can any suspected criminal claim to be a victim of modern slavery to avoid going to prison and being punished?
/r/MensRights18/12/20 12:52 AM
1

It should be common knowledge that once a man ends a relationship with a woman, he can NEVER resume it with her again. Sex is physical for men and emotional for women. Women don't have sex unless they feel chemistry. You killed the chemistry permanently by breaking up with her, so now she feels you don't love her any more.
/r/askMRP16/11/20 01:11 AM
1

She's not interested
/r/askTRP15/11/20 01:53 AM
9

Only women and feminists say that men should show emotions to women. Never take advice on how to seduce women from women, as they fail to understand the hard work involved in building and maintaining attraction and women are solipsistic when it comes to intergender dynamics because they think gender is a social construct so they assume that men like the same things they like. Only get advice from men.
/r/askTRP15/11/20 01:50 AM
-7

It looks like she's been reading too many red pill blogs and forums. Women are game savvy as they like to learn how men think. So it looks like she's doing "dread game" that she read off the red pill websites. Her behaviour is the exact same behaviour this forum encourages men to do, to strengthen a relationship. Just relax. She's trying to make you jealous and all this will blow over.
/r/askTRP14/11/20 05:36 AM
2

Women don't use dating websites to get sex, they use them for attention and male validation. A woman's phone has notifications all day every day like Las Vegas while a man's phone has little activity in it. Why should a woman rely on Tinder, if her phone is giving her so much attention elsewhere? Women don't need to use dating websites to have sex, as women tend to have larger social circles than men, due to their higher empathy, higher social skills, being cold approached more, being invited to…
/r/askTRP14/11/20 12:49 AM
1

It looks like she's been reading too many red pill blogs and forums. Women are game savvy as they like to know how men think. So it looks like she's doing "dread game" that she read off the red pill websites. Her behaviour is the exact same behaviour this forum encourages men to do, to strengthen a relationship. Just relax. She's trying to make you jealous and all this will blow over.
/r/askTRP08/11/20 03:06 AM
-1

He's a lucky boy, I wish that was me. It's obvious he enjoyed it. By the way, rape and sexual harassment is more traumatic for women than it is for men, so there's only a victim if a man has sex with an underage girl. Especially as guys can't say no to sex.
/r/PussyPass25/10/20 10:00 PM
-1

Women don't need to rape because it's much easier for them to get sex than men.
/r/PussyPass25/10/20 09:49 PM
1

Mastodon, GNU Social, Pleroma are for microblogging, not forums.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/20 06:45 PM
14

What's the difference between forums.red and trp.red? Why do we need two different websites?
/r/TheRedPill21/08/20 03:26 AM
-3

Therapy is a waste of time and money
/r/askTRP19/07/20 09:43 AM
3

Every time a woman complains about men rejecting her or not being able to find commitment, the men she tries to get with are only high value alpha males. Those women don't consider beta males. She could have a relationship if her standards weren't so high. If a woman is always rejected, it's because she's only focusing on high value alpha males and she doesn't want to consider beta males. But if a man is always rejected, no women will consider him and he's an incel. Men being rejected by women a…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/07/20 04:15 PM
-4

Feminism is needed in sharia law countries, not western countries.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 03:42 PM
2

4chan isn't anti establishment. When Gamergate happened everyone who talked about it was banned so all their users moved to 8chan. 8chan supported freedom of speech so much they got banned by Cloudflare.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/20 02:18 PM
11

Just another case of a woman using her pussy to get a man's money but in a long term relationship.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/07/20 11:28 PM
4

If a man is single, it's fate, if a woman is single it's by choice.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/20 09:35 PM
-4

I'm a nice person. There's nothing wrong with my comment or what I do.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 06:40 PM
0

I know. I mean that females can't be incels because men have lower standards and women have higher standards.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 06:35 PM
1

In theory innocent until proven guilty is supposed to exist, but that doesn't apply to sex crime and domestic violence. When it comes to rape, a woman can claim a man raped or sexually assaulted her without evidence, and the man can go to prison based on her word. There's lots of cases like this.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 06:02 PM
-84

Females cannot be incels
/r/MensRights11/07/20 05:38 PM
0

I bet it’s only sexual harassment if the stuff in the video happens to a woman. A man wouldn’t complain if that attractive woman did it to him.
/r/PussyPass07/03/20 01:44 PM
6

The BBC also has lots of documentaries about male suicide
/r/MensRights26/03/18 04:51 PM
39

Yeah it's a good campaign, but the causes of male suicide are not properly explained. When will there be a campaign exposing that men are the disposable sex?
/r/MensRights26/03/18 04:39 PM
2

Have you ever felt cheated out of thing because you are a man? Women are not held accountable for their actions to the same extent that men are - in all aspects of life. This negatively affects men in a multitude of ways. Too many to mention. People are generally more friendly and nice to you when you're a woman. This benefits women in many ways and negatively affects men in many ways. Too many to mention. Women can put on a sad or upset face and blatantly LIE, and the person on the receiving en…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 08:03 PM
3

Court sentences are 37-60% longer than men than they are for women for the same crime [two] [three], and drunk drivers who kill women get longer sentences than drunk drivers who kill men (National Bureau of Economic Research at Harvard University, April 2000). In 2010, British judges were ordered to treat female criminals more leniently in comparison to males. A man who bit part of someone's ear got sentenced to prison, whereas a woman who did the same thing got probation. The same result happen…
/r/MensRights16/11/17 06:53 PM
6

The media controls what people think. The media is gynocentric.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 03:11 AM
8

Most men in feminist anglocentric western countries believe in male privilege and that women are second class citizens.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 02:16 AM
3

Also antibiotics fed to animals which move up the food chain which are responsible for girls starting puberty earlier and men becoming more feminine.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/17 06:12 PM
4

I never once doubted you. Stop being paranoid.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/17 05:20 PM
16

If we never had to provide evidence for any social phenomenon, anyone could make any claim and demand anyone to believe it without merit. Feminists would be able to say we live in a patriarchy and rape culture and demand others believe it without providing a shred of evidence. I found a source now. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2016/07/15/this-tool-gender-swapped-the-voices-of-tech-job-candidates-heres-what-happened/
/r/TheRedPill30/07/17 03:12 PM
8

Can I see the source of this telephone study?
/r/TheRedPill30/07/17 11:20 AM
1

Prenups are worthless. Judges can make them void.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 11:26 AM
0

Create an account on http://photofeeler.com to see how attractive you are. Your photos will not be accessible to a google search. Keep in mind that all voting systems are unreliable (which is why the votes are manipulated by AI) so take the results with a grain of salt.
/r/askTRP16/07/17 09:01 PM
3

She doesn't like you, she just likes male validation.
/r/askTRP16/07/17 07:13 PM
1

We are living in a culture war. Women always try to join then subvert male red pill spaces and change them into feminist blue pill spaces. Women want men to be effeminate so they can exert power and control over them. As Katie Hopkins says, feminists don't really want equality as they wouldn't like to be treat as equals.
/r/askTRP16/07/17 07:10 PM
1

I'm going to remember that quote for future reference.
/r/askTRP16/07/17 07:07 PM
4

The best cure for no pussy is new pussy.
/r/askTRP16/07/17 07:05 PM
0

In western countries there are double the amount of women on dating websites than men.
/r/askTRP16/07/17 07:05 PM
3

The immediate cause of the change was feminism.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/17 10:04 AM
1

First you have to understand what marriage is. Marriage is a price control on women. Marriage and monogamy was invented by men to ration women amongst males, because when women opt out of monogamy, they prefer to SHARE the same alpha male than to choose someone who is single. Women opting out of monogamy is destructive for society, but not when men do it. In the olden days before marriage was invented, 17 women reproduced for every man despite there being an equal amount of men and women. The ma…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/17 10:01 AM
3

No I mean you think you've fucked up when you haven't.
/r/askTRP10/07/17 04:12 AM
2

Your definition of fuck up and my definition of fuck up are completely different.
/r/askTRP10/07/17 03:55 AM
1

I didn't make this thread to whine. What does whining solve? Nothing! What's the point of that? It just makes people more depressed. I just wanted to know if the woman was lying or not, especially as the mating strategies of men and women are incompatible.
/r/askTRP10/07/17 02:51 AM
2

She wants to see if you'll apologise. Stand your ground and don't apologise.
/r/askTRP10/07/17 02:30 AM
3

If a woman isn't attracted to you in the first 5 minutes, she'll never be attracted to you. Learn to read social cues and body language. Don't worry about stuttering or getting nervous unless it makes you have nothing to say. Someone did a Tinder experiment as an attractive male where they told the women they had autism asking if that's okay, and all the women said it was okay, just because he was attractive.
/r/askTRP10/07/17 02:24 AM
1

I understand that sexualised light skinned women in the media sells, particularly music, but asians are seen as more attractive than light skinned black people, even today. What you fail to realise is that there is a small percentage of black people who are actually attractive, which is not the case for asian or white people. People say "you're attractive for a black girl", but nobody ever says "you're attractive for an asian girl" or "you're attractive for a black girl". The light skinned black…
/r/askTRP10/07/17 02:23 AM
2

She's trying to reverse the power dynamic. Don't let her dominate you. Women hold all the power in relationships because they have pussy, so if you pass the shit test and show you have dominance, she'll be more attracted to you.
/r/askTRP10/07/17 02:19 AM
1

Because they are pussywhipped.
/r/askTRP10/07/17 02:17 AM
1

The media promotes light skinned black women way more than asians not because they are seen as more attractive, but instead because black people are viewed as more oppressed than asian people, so putting black people in the media in a positive light is a form of social engineering designed to positively influence the way we view black people and hopefully eliminate racism, like the #OscarsSoWhite hashtag, Black History Month and affirmative action. Black people are higher on the "oppression scal…
/r/askTRP10/07/17 02:14 AM
0

That's not true. Asian women are second to white women, not light skin black women.
/r/askTRP10/07/17 02:07 AM
0

It's not white supremacist nonsense. It's a fact. If you don't believe that some races are considered to be more attractive than others by society, then you're naive. The thing is that if someone envies someone, they usually keep the knowledge of their envy to themselves. Black women are at the bottom of the hierarchy for race attractiveness. All black women envy white women. Pharrell caused controversy for only putting white women on his album cover as black women complained that he should have…
/r/askTRP09/07/17 10:38 PM
-1

I agree that she can't get over being black. All black women envy white women wish they were white. Do you believe that beauty standards are to some extent created by the environment? Do you believe that a person can be more or less attractive depending on what country they travel to?
/r/askTRP09/07/17 08:52 PM
6

This would never of happened if you were a woman filming your child in the park.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 09:26 PM
6

You should press charges and sue.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 09:25 PM
2

According to the article the only "evidence" she did anything illegal was a 17 year old's statement. There is no evidence. If she gets found guilty over her smiling, then it's a travesty of justice.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 10:36 PM
7

Because males can't be raped as they always enjoy it. Because female sexuality is good and male sexuality is bad.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 10:31 PM
0

No it hasn't. I read plenty of news articles that do not refer to women sexing up underage males as pedophiels. You said women. The key word here is women. My article that this thread links to, specifically says that rape, sexual assault and paedophilia is treated differently when men do it than when women do it, and is written in the news differently when men do it than when women do it. This does not mean the meaning of the word paedophile has stayed the same. The meaning of the word paedophil…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 11:39 PM
0

The meaning of the word paedophile has CHANGED!!! That's what it NOW means!!!
/r/MensRights13/02/17 10:33 PM
1

Are you saddened that people sexually attracted to pubescent underage girls are being given the same label as those attracted to prepubescent girls? Does it bother you that someone sexually attracted to a 17 year old is put into the same category as someone attracted to a 7 year old? Does this bother you, considering most teenage girls nowadays look like adults? Look at this image. http://imgur.com/a/iFmsA One of the girls here is an adult, and one is underage? Can you spot which is the child? W…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 08:21 PM
1

The meanings of words change over time. The word gay used to mean happy, now it means homosexual. You should not have a problem with the word paedophile, changing its meaning to mean under 18 instead of prepubescent. I was only using the word in the way that it is commonly used today, so there would be no confusion in what I meant.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 07:32 PM
2

How can a question be moving the goalposts? Read my comment again. I never made any assertion or claim in my question. I just asked you a simple question. I'll try a different approach? What do you think a paedophile is?
/r/MensRights13/02/17 05:22 PM
1

California law does say that someone who has sex with a 17 year old in California is a paedophile. Under the California Labor Code, "minor" is defined as any person under the age of 18 years required to attend school under the provisions of the Education Code, and any person under age six. https://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/DLSE-CL.htm
/r/MensRights13/02/17 05:17 PM
2

Are you suggesting that even though the oxford dictionary says someone who is attracted to children is a paedophile, and that California law says that someone who is 17 year old is a child; that we as people, should not say they are a paedophile?
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:59 PM
3

When I was in school there was a female teacher who had sex with underage students, and everyone knew about it, even the staff, and nobody snitched on her. In fact everyone saw it as a good thing as having sex with attractive female teachers is every boy's dream.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:55 PM
2

So what do you suppose a man who who has sex with a 17 year old inside california is called? Not a pedophile?
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:41 PM
2

http://www.ageofconsent.com/california.htm
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:31 PM
2

I see what you're trying to say? How can British law say a 17 year old can consent to sex, yet they're treated as a child not an adult when put into police custody? How can mumsnet view 17 year olds as children, if they can legally consent to sex in Britain? So according to you and these people in concert, fucking a totally legal 17 year old due to attraction is a pedophile behavior. I did not say that. I said that under the LAW it is pedophile behaviour. My article does not state whether any pa…
/r/MensRights13/02/17 03:58 PM
2

I meant as the law defines it, so we can observe the difference of attitudes when men who illegally have sex with underage children, and women who illegally have sex with underage children. My article does not say that men who have sex with 16 year old or 15 year old girls are bad people doing bad things. Exactly when is child established in age? I don't even know myself. In Britain, age of criminal responsibility starts at 10, so you can argue that a 10 year old can consent to sex, if they can …
/r/MensRights13/02/17 03:53 PM
2

I meant as the law defines it, so we can observe the difference in attitudes of men who illegally have sex with underage children, and women who illegally have sex with underage children.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 03:51 PM
2

Last time I checked, women can be punished under the law for underage sex, not just men. Females get exposed and shamed for being attracted to underage pubescent people, not just men. http://lookism.net/Thread-FEMALE-PEDOPHILES-exposed-on-Tinder
/r/MensRights09/02/17 10:40 AM
3

You're forgetting that women can be sexually attracted to underage pubescent people too. It works both ways.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 10:05 AM
1

Here's the source https://redpillpushers.wordpress.com/2014/02/23/my-favorite-manosphere-post-this-week-2-23-14/
/r/MensRights09/02/17 10:02 AM
2

I'm sure I said it clearly.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 09:58 AM
5

It shows that twitter supports feminism.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 11:04 PM
5

It is unclear how much influence she has.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 10:47 PM
4

Twitter implied there's more bans to come.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 10:22 PM
1

are there any male privileges that we should be working against The problem with eradicating privilege, is that it does not come from an institution. It doesn't come from the schools, the media, or the legal system etc, so to try to find out the source of what is CAUSING the privilege, is very difficult. How do we make women not discouraged from entering STEM? How do we make men and women have equal sentences for crimes? That's not something I have the ideas to solve, as there is no person or pl…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 09:23 PM
1

The only controversy I see here is where it says Men can stop rape instead of You can stop rape.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 09:18 PM
-2

Message me with your email address if you want a http://gab.ai invite
/r/MensRights08/02/17 09:17 PM
17

Twitter isn't trying to stop free speech? I guess that's why feminists such as Anita Sarkeesian of Feminist Frequency is in charge of moderating Twitter.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 08:06 PM
5

So banning the account is good??? People moan about nothing??? I think everyone who SURFS the internet knows by now that Apple, Google and Facebook censor stuff. Is censoring good or bad? Most people would say bad.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 07:42 PM
3

Log everything, use video evidence, buy CCTV cameras for your home.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 07:21 PM
3

Physical Strength You're right! Men can beat up men too, but women can also beat up women. However women can beat up men but men cannot beat up women. You don't understand anything I tell you. Verbal Strength Both cases were NOT controversial. I've searched "jessica valenti male tears" into Google, and none of the top 10 links criticise her for wearing that t-shirt, some even defend her. Sexual Strength The fact of the matter is, if you got a hundred 40 year old men, and a hundred 40 year old wo…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:57 PM
2

being a man is not a disadvantage, otherwise the richest people on Earth would not be men You're equating the 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000001% of men who are millionaires, with men in general. Most men are not elites. Most men are disadvantaged compared to women. That's what feminists do, they see that the politicians, CEOs and STEM workers are men, and conclude from that, that male privilege exists, when in fact the majority of men are disadvantaged. They conflate a few exceptions and a…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:55 PM
2

What is the potential or power for me to become a very very rich man? 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000001%
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:46 PM
5

More people are anti-feminist than are a feminist.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:15 PM
3

Are you a woman? Physical Strength There is a stigma against men hitting women. CAN'T USE Verbal Strength When Jessica Valenti wears a "I bathe in male tears t-shirt, there is no controversy". When Donald Trump calls Rosie O'Donnell fat, there is controversy. CAN'T USE Sexual Strength There is no perhaps. Women are the choosers. A woman in their 30s has more sexual choice than a man in their 30s. CAN'T USE Economic strength It's obvious what it means. Social strength Men are the disposable sex. …
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:47 PM
2

Are we talking about men in general, or the stark minority who are millionaires?
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:44 PM
4

Voat asked their users for donations after their traffic spiked. If Voat had more money, they would be able to expand and handle higher traffic.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:38 PM
2

A woman gets $300 a day for selling positive pregnancy tests on craigslist.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:20 PM
2

Also the amount of women working is increasing and the amount of men working is decreasing.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:13 PM
3

Women earn more than men when you compare single childless not married men to single childless not married women, and women control the majority of the spending decisions worldwide.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:01 PM
1

Earning potential.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 04:53 PM
50

If this continues and they wipe out all the anti-feminists, it will be twitter's downfall and gab's benefit.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 02:35 PM
2

I forgot to add to my article that the Mirror called a female paedophile, glamorous. http://archive.is/YZiW7 If it was a man, he would not be called the same thing, so people DO treat paedophilia different if a man or woman is doing it. I went to a school where a female teacher had sex with underage male students, all the staff knew about it and none reported her as it was seen as every boy's dream.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 01:33 PM
2

I agree with the second half.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 01:06 PM
2

You're arguing with me over semantics. According to the Oxford dictionary, being attracted to a 15 year old or pubescent underage person is a paedophile. http://imgur.com/oq2VPLR
/r/MensRights08/02/17 12:52 PM
9

Being disposable Having to earn my masculinity
/r/MensRights08/02/17 11:16 AM
13

Sexual power. Women have more choice and control in relationships.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 11:12 AM
6

This is satire.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 10:07 AM
4

Of course feminism bans people who dissent. You can't justify the need for feminism sufficently, as feminism isn't based on proper logic or reasoning.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 09:33 AM
2

Sounds like something a SJW would do. Your idea isn't going to help those websites lose money. It won't make a dent. It's like how Sleeping Giant is trying to make Breitbart lose money by telling their advertisers how Breitbart apparently has hate speech. Yes Kellogg has boycotted Breitbart, but they have hundreds of millions of visitors, so they can always make money.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 07:47 PM
2

So basically you want to remove advertising revenue from websites you think are anti-male. Your idea isn't going to make a dent in their profits.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 07:31 PM
1

It hasn't been passed, and I really don't see it passing a vote. Yes means yes passed. Rape by fraud passed.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 06:07 PM
3

I found a bug. When browsing the sections from the top bar on the screen, "the red pill network" does not link to trp.red
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 03:12 AM
1

What framework did you use?
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 03:02 AM
1

I think the feminist won. Having 100 sexual partners whilst single doesn't mean you'll cheat whilst in a relationship.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 12:10 AM
1

The top 20% will use the app if the top 20% women are on the app.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 11:12 PM
1

What alpha male in the top 20% of men (the men she wants) are going to want to date a 31 year old (the woman who made the app)?
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 10:52 PM
1

I would agree. She also said there would be no NHS in 10 years due to the growing population. They're already having to build new schools and unemployment is too high. Back in the 90s, anyone could get a job in 1 week or sometimes 1 day.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/14 04:21 AM
1

She said on Twitter that there'd be no NHS in 20 years so she's against that, so maybe she wants to abolish income tax like what Ron Paul wants to do.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 08:17 AM
2

You cannot make that shit up.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 01:26 AM
3

I read on the internet that she doesn't believe in the minimum wage, that her business does does zero hour contracts, and that all her employees are self employed so she can pay them below the minimum wage.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 10:23 PM
1

If you think that being nice and romantic helps you get women, read this. Read this. http://thoughtcatalog.com/eskil-svitjod/2014/05/do-you-want-to-fuck-women-then-dont-just-be-yourself/
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 06:49 PM
2

Here's some more information behind the psychology of women preferring alpha male and maybe dark triad traits compared to beta male traits. http://www.riseofsigma.com/2014/01/the-female-imperative-dna-bad-boys.html
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 06:28 PM
4

Alpha males are men who have a selection of multiple women they can choose from. Beta males are men who don't have a selection of multiple women they can choose from, and they have to take whatever comes, like waiting for an apple to fall from a tree because you don't have a ladder to climb up it. I'm sure you know what Tinder is. It allows men and women to swipe "accept" and "reject" at various human faces of the opposite sex and if both parties choose accept, there is a match. Then they can in…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 06:19 PM
2

I use my Attract, Scare, Pivot, Pager Prompt, Pathway method of interacting with others, men and women, and it always works as it's manipulative and genuine (too long to explain here). You might get a jolt of adrenaline when interacting with women, and adrenaline makes you do risks and do stupid things, like take risks in the war that can leave you amputated, so always regulate your actions. You don't want to hit a mistake buffer and feel gutted about it. When getting girl's phone numbers and th…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 05:58 PM
2

That depends what you mean by kindness, alpha male kindness, or beta male kindness. It goes like this. Are you treating this woman nice or kind because she has a vagina and you wouldn't treat a man the same way if they were doing the same exact things? ------------> If the answer is yes, forget what you was planning on doing and try something else. ------------> If the answer is no, go ahead and do it. Women will never admit this as they don't want beta males to fake being alpha so they can't de…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 05:46 PM
1

So you're saying that there's no group of men who has a pick of multiple women like alpha males? Nonsense! Stop trolling. https://web.archive.org/web/20110807080602/http://www.halfsigma.com/2007/01/alpha_beta_and_.html
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 05:30 PM
2

It's called doing the complete opposite of what every other man is doing to women. Not giving her loads of Facebook likes, approval, kindness, etc, so it differentiates you. Just don't be mean for too long.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 05:28 PM
4

Men should never ask women advice on how to attract women, as they always end up with the man they say they don't want.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 05:22 PM
-3

Stop trolling. How hard is it to stick a dick in a hole? Jesus Christ!
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 05:16 PM
3

I think I know why. Third Wave Feminism asks for legal, social and structural changes for women, and they pressure companies, the media, education and the government to advocate for their cause. They even have to resort to newspeak to change Lara Croft's breasts in video games, "objectification" and "male gaze" to get them smaller. However, they have NO help for women on an individual level other than to go to a SlutWallk and hold a placard (or doxx). The Red Pill does away with all that, and fo…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 05:14 PM
2

MTGOW is hated by women, as the less men opting out of sex and relationships, the lower the price of sex, and the less power women will have, sexually, socially and more. The fact that MTGOW rids women of creepy and undesirable guys is nothing in comparison to the loss of power women will have if that movement grows. The reason why the price of sex is so high and is the highest priced service per hour on the planet, is because men have made it a necessity, just like food and housing. Jewellery, …
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 09:25 AM
2

Women settle. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2507043/Almost-THIRD-married-women-say-havent-Mr-Right.html Men marry for sex and settle too. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2104921/A-men-admit-marry-woman-NOT-love-with.html
/r/askTRP12/08/14 02:51 PM
3

The woman who runs this, Laura Bates is a misandrist. I never saw it at first, but now I do. Firstly the website is called "Everyday sexism" but the header of the site says it only allows sexism women face, not sexism men face. If that's not misandrist, I don't know what is. The only purpose of the site is to "raise awareness" when it's really about "villanising men". The site is not progressive. There is no ideas for change, no blueprints, no plans. She has a column in The Guardian where she li…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 10:09 PM
1

I found the RedditLog in my history, but I cannot find the TheRedPill discussion of this link.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 05:25 PM
1

You didn't do anything wrong. That's women's entitlement culture for you, replying to you because she wants to but not giving you the respect to say she's leaving. She's probably done this for one of two reasons. She saw her inbox was full of sexual advances and objectification, so she became disillusioned with online dating. She is using online dating not to date but for validation to boost her ego. Tinder is causing this mentality.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 08:15 AM
3

This is proof of why women don't like nice guys. Betas get no love.
/r/RedPillWomen04/03/14 07:39 PM
2

Marriage is a form of prostitution, as women get to have sex with men for money, so they don't have to go to work for the rest of their lives.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 10:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter