TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dicaparly Archive

View 3 posts and 218 comments by dicaparly on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So we should try to shut down this legislation because it doesn't go far enough for you? That's what I don't get. What is wrong with something that bans a harmful practice? That it isn't perfect? If it matters so much, and you want to change people's opinions, maybe you should go and advocate for your cause instead of advocating against something because it isn't your cause.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 10:09 PM
1

How dense are you? Again, X does not mean Y. Genital mutilation is wrong. Whether its done to boys or girls. (I know reading comprehension is difficult). If there are policies that seek to ban the practice, they should be supported. It doesn't matter whether it is targeted at one gender or both. Its because of comments like yours that nobody wants to support MRAs because you act like a feminist who is willing to shut something down simply because it doesn't help "your side".
/r/MensRights02/12/18 10:07 PM
4

Not supporting FGM vans because they arent gender neutral is a pretty stupid reason. Advocate for gender neutral bans, or advocate for MGM bans, but saying "I refuse to support banning FGM" is going to make you look like a piece of shit, no matter what comes after that phrase. Even though your reason is a perfectly valid one. Any genital mutilation is bad, and any amount of legislation to protect children, regardless of which children, from a harmful practice should be welcomed and supported.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 05:55 PM
12

first link is a list of scholarships, most having other requirements such as native American or war veteran. second is a forum discussion on that same site that i didnt read, and this was the third. Oh the fucking irony. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/mvxd4n/why-are-there-still-male-only-scholarships-in-canada&ved=2ahUKEwiHqfP3ofjeAhUI7IMKHVfiBr0QFjACegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw0qxUjM_6SaFZ_Su5IgXeaC&ampcf=1
/r/MensRights28/11/18 11:45 PM
1

don't worry, it just means that's one less recruiter you have to listen to when the job fair comes to town
/r/MensRights28/11/18 11:41 PM
2

The same way you open your legs and let a slob like Weinstein have his way with you. Coerced sex acts are still sexual assault. If we hold the standard for men, then it also applies to women.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 12:01 PM
12

Sure, but we still take allegations seriously and treat them as if they could be true. The NYPD failed to do that, and this man was treated the way that these same people accuse us of treating women like Ford or Sulcowatsherface. This story just exposes the double standard (yet again) of how we treat possible sexual assault against women vs men. If it turns out to be a false allegation, then we hold him to the same standard we hold women (that is, the court will probably give him a slap on the w…
/r/MensRights28/11/18 11:59 AM
4

The shirts, which are sold in conjunction with Fawcett Society (whose slogan is "Working for women's rights since 1886") Clearly.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 11:50 AM
3

I can't think of anything he's said that I disagree with. Except for how he seems to revel in YouTube drama despite his insistence that he hates it.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 11:47 PM
1

It was probably around... 2014-2015? He first started YouTube with gamergate, then talked about the whole "race and statistics" thing and some other stuff, and then moved to brexit/mainstream politics. I remember it distinctly because one of his first videos I saw, he spent a whole segment of the video talking about why he thinks the n-word shouldn't be taboo.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 02:57 PM
6

His earliest videos had a lot of content about race, but he began focusing on the more mainstream political content during the brexit debate.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 09:35 PM
1

The only one that fits me is the alt right part, fortunately.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:30 PM
4

Sure, I'll add another random accusation to the list. I'm now a racist misogynist homophobe islamophobe Nazi fascist sexist white supremacist bigot mra. Am I missing anything?
/r/MensRights16/11/18 02:40 PM
1

At least droids can maintain their integrity. Apparently, that's a talent the Jedi never figured out
/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:33 PM
4

And then doubled down on the comment a few days later.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 11:38 PM
1

In general, couples that stay together longer tend to have more stable marriages. There are always individual cases that break that assumption, but those aren't the average cases. But don't get me wrong, I'm very happy for you that you are in a happy and successful relationship. Congrats on that!
/r/MensRights24/10/18 10:56 PM
-1

I'm curious to know why you got married because based only on this comment and having no context or knowing anything about you, it sounds like you don't fully trust your spouse, and that your relationship wasn't the most stable. If that's not true, then forgive me for making that assumption, but I hope you can see how I came to that conclusion.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 10:54 PM
10

I agree on the second part. Alimony and child support are two areas of law that need serious reform. The concepts are based in very old ways of thinking and haven't been reconsidered as our society evolved. I don't think alimony should exist at all, and child support needs to be viewed on an individual case basis, where the facts of each case are investigated and an equitable arrangement is put together that benefits everybody involved.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 07:38 PM
44

Problem is, people lie. Just ask my ex. Finding the right woman to marry is something that takes time. You need to actually know the person you're with. Maybe if people stopped running off to get hitched after 3 or 4 months, this wouldn't be so common. And if people were honest and open with their partners, bothered to live together first, and act like they take the relationship and the decision seriously, they wouldn't get fucked over. And yeah, sometimes people change. Sometimes a woman is fin…
/r/MensRights24/10/18 04:24 PM
21

Because pussy pass.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 06:31 PM
48

She was raised by her mom. Unless there's something about abuse going on there, which could have an effect on the victim. But I didn't read the article, so I have no idea if that's the case.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 09:41 AM
1

Wait, you mean I'm not allowed to do that until I have kids? No wonder all my neighbors stare at me weird...
/r/MensRights15/10/18 03:45 PM
-7

When did /r/mensrights become another MGTOW page? I thought this sub was for discussing actual issues. No wonder so many conservatives are writing the movement off.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 05:00 PM
28

Let's take a story I'm familiar with: guy and girl went through a nasty breakup, they had a kid. Both were cheating. Dad decided he didn't want to get the kids involved in the mess, so mom told the kid her side of the story. Kid hates dad, calls mom's new boyfriend dad, and dad is completely cut off from kid. His own family hates him because they think he's a deadbeat, but he just let's then think that instead of giving away her secrets because he's that kind of person. So he suffers the disdain…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 01:50 AM
13

You go to jail for failure to pay, then you get further in debt, causing you to end up back in jail constantly. Unless you somehow manage to find the only judge in the country that would be willing to say "fuck that shit". But that guy died a few decades ago.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 03:01 AM
1

I didn't mean to say it was a problem, just that it's interesting to me that they timed it so well. I fully support Atlassian, and this statement they made, and I have no issue with it as marketing tactic or policy. Observations aren't always criticisms.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 01:18 PM
5

They are, which is why I was happy when they stayed silent. Their software is stable, the interfaces are beautiful, and they are just enjoyable platforms all around.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 10:22 PM
44

I don't get this. Atlassian stayed out of the SJW craze. When GitHub pulled the "diversity" card, several developers jumped to BitBucket (an atlassian product) because they were laying low on it. It looks like they decided that now is a good time to go public with their position, knowing that the overall political scene is ripe for exploiting. I'm happy to see this statement from them, and it reinforces my belief that the company is grounded in a strong HR ideology, but I think the timing is con…
/r/MensRights05/10/18 01:06 PM
14

"if a few innocent men have to go to jail to lock up rapists, that's a price I'm willing to pay" - said by a woman. If that wasn't the clearest admission of modern feminist thought, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 03:34 AM
8

Shit, Reddit downvotes and tries to prove you wrong even when you provide sources. I have a comment with a couple hundred downvotes because I said that dump trucks hauling gravel can't control their load like enclosed trucks, and a dozen or so comments essentially saying "I don't care, that's not an excuse, I know more than dump truck drivers because I drive a car". And this is the most sanitary example I can give.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:14 PM
3

Yeah, or at least for the cheapest insurance to not cost 50%+ of my monthly income and still have a $10k deductible before it even kicks in because that's the "crisis" insurance.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 11:33 PM
14

They'll find something. Probably the surname of the author was the same surname used by some German dude in 1933, therefore the author is a fascist Nazi and the study is invalid. Or something.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 01:51 AM
3

At Amazon, they have "affinity groups" which are private groups of employees with specific traits (women, blacks, Muslims, transgender etc.) And each affinity group has access to special resources not available to other employees, including career coaching, mentorships, advancement opportunities, and other directly career-related advantages. There are three groups that have been denied affinity groups: men, Christians, and white people. Because the company believes that these groups don't need a…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:39 PM
-1

She has to follow certain rules pertaining to ownership. But for her to sit there and claim that a dog has no rights is not only wrong, but it's grossly immoral. Several times, she says something disgusting about pets that has nothing to do with the questions in the case. Her personal views on pets (which she shares on occasion on the show) is sickening.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 03:22 PM
3

She used to be a sitting judge, but her TV show isn't an actual courtroom. It's an arbitration court that the parties agree to have their case heard by her, and her decision is binding. Part of the deal of coming on the show is that all cases in civil court have to be dropped by both parties.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 03:17 PM
0

She's great about true gender equality, but just wait until she opens her mouth on animals. Any time a pet is involved, she talks about it as a piece of property, not a living animal. Or any time a business transaction is involved. She hates business owners and almost never let's them provide documentation to support themselves. She often doesnt allow anything that would be useful in solving a case including police statements, witness statements, or other similar documents unless they support wh…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 09:34 AM
4

Advertising products to "rich white families" doesn't mean someone is right wing. It means someone advertises to a particular demographic. The content of NYT opinions, the attitudes and character of their editors, and the selective coverage of events in their news segments skew heavily towards a progressive ideology. Would you call Jeff Bezos or any of the silicon valley leaders like Bill Gates or Tom Zuckerberg "right wing"? After all, they are predominantly white heterosexual men with families…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 04:18 AM
1

And I bet that 100 if those statues aren't even humans at all.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 01:23 PM
12

They don't have to, his wife does it for them. I love his comedy, and used to listen to his podcast every week. But he started having his wife on regularly and she is a pretty irritating feminist who is everything he makes fun of in his jokes. And he completely stops being funny whenever she's around.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 12:55 AM
8

If owning a camper van is being homeless, then living in the sleeper cab of a truck with less space than a shithole apartment bathroom must be... I don't even know.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 09:08 PM
0

Having watched her show a lot, I can only agree on this when it comes to gender roles. She doesn't take shit from anybody when it comes to these issues, but i cant stand the way she refers to animals, especially dogs, and how she blatantly ignores contracts and business agreements.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 11:52 PM
11

Pandora, Amazon Music, Google Play Music, Apple Music... But so far Pandora is the only company that hasn't completely caved to progressive nuts. Although I do enjoy Amazon Music as a Prime member because it gives me more control over my music and their library is big enough for me to find what I like to listen to. And they haven't gone and removed artists simply because they aren't politically correct.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 02:48 PM
5

Sexual crimes have been getting special treatment for decades to the point that, up until recently, false accusers of sexual crimes didn't have to worry about facing punishment for their actions. The reasoning was that prosecuting false accusers somehow would have a chilling effect on actual victims
/r/MensRights08/05/18 08:14 PM
15

No, he made a (admittedly rude and honestly inapproriate) move to kiss the girl on the shoulder. Katy Perry manipulated a guy and tricked him into a full-on kiss against his will after he explicitely said he didnt want her to. What this guy did was stupid and inappropriate. What she did was much closer to sexual assault (although i still dont want to call it that, because i dont feel that its as serious as groping or similar.)
/r/MensRights18/03/18 01:18 PM
4

Same here, but i find that the kind of people (not just women, but people in general) with enough sense to not pick fights they cant win are the same kind of people who... dont pick fights they cant win. Every woman i talk to who sees these videos cannot fathom the stupidity of it. Same with guys who see the videos of tiny bullies picking on kids three times their size. It takes a special kind of stupid to do that.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 02:10 PM
2

There is a surrender of paternal rights, which is essentially this. But you have to go to family court, well-known for biased judges, and you need information about the child and mother that, in some cases, you cant obtain. Especially if you are paying child support with no custody or visitation rights, and you dont get to know the address the child is living. And you still need to prove to the judge that its somehow in the best interest of the child for you to not be forced to pay 2/3rds of you…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 04:30 PM
5

Equal opportunity serial killer
/r/MensRights07/02/18 04:27 PM
6

A paoer on an economics and business concept. Professor says you arent allowed to use business sources because they dont fit her narrative. Do your research - but only use sources I approve for you, and nothing else.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:32 PM
6

I think that comment may be an ezample of "explains, but does not excuse". It doesnt indicate that the idea was good, only that the idea was there.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:28 PM
13

No, the assault was when he inhabited the same room as the poor, helpless victim. Calling her a thot was the hate crime part.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 12:17 AM
58

No, theyll double down and use the lawsuit as a tactic to get more money from blindfolded idiots who will see the issue as an evil man trying to get rid of DV shelters.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 04:19 PM
1

Net neutrality came under heavy attack several times during the Obama administration (and probably GW Bush, but i wasnt really paying attention back then), so to claim that this current attempt to remove it is somehow the fault of Trump is, at best, misinformed.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:27 PM
1

Exactly what these three guys were trying to say.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 03:17 PM
15

I feel that almost every time one of these "apologies" comes out, its just a PR firm trying to control tge situation.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 03:29 PM
1

Not true. A truck driver was charged with sexual harassment and put on the most severe sex registry for taking a piss behind his truck in a parking lot. Nobody saw him, except for a camera on a lightpole.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 09:47 AM
12

Unemployed ex-journalist Savanmah Seymour in 5... 4... 3...
/r/MensRights23/10/17 11:04 AM
2

Because theres never been a case where a woman was fine until after the baby was born... 6 years into the relationship.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:34 PM
10

And sometimes, all the way to another country 3,000 miles away
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:32 PM
3

There are "malls" in big cities like New York and LA that have grocery stores (i delivered to a kroger in manhattan that was in a mall once), but they arent what 95% of americans consider a mall so much as a bunch of stores stacked on top of each other.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:32 PM
2

Every city ived lived in has multiple malls. Ive only ever gone to maybe one or two stores at any of them, and all those stores are either closing or went bankrupt years ago.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 03:30 PM
9

I don't know about the first claim, but there are specific debts that are immune from bankruptcy. I don't know about court orders, but federal student loans can't be forgiven in bankruptcy. And there are a few others as well.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 03:37 PM
2

I was actually surprised at how fast it was getting downvoted. I expected people would be able to discern the sarcasm, but sometimes I forget that comments like that are not uncommon on reddit.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:24 PM
12

I'm sarcastic, of course! If someone actually believed that bullshit, I doubt they'd be on this subreddit very long.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:51 PM
24

Yeah, but the only job their fragile male ego can handle is latrine cleaner, so they'll just be posted there. Damn, people, do I really need the /s?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 02:53 PM
1

She's currently being charged with murder and involuntary manslaughter. So it's very likely that she could get away with murder on a much lesser charge. This happened near where I live, and the prosecutor has a tendency to bring multiple charges, hoping that he can get a conviction on one of them, even if itsnt the one he wants.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 05:54 AM
2

Clearly youve never been to a walmart in the deep south during pollen season
/r/MensRights06/06/17 04:33 PM
30

These women think that periods should be public and exposed everywhere with blood running down the streets like midieval shit-water. Anything less is a clear sign of the patriarchal oppression of the woman race or something.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 03:16 AM
58

The only difference between her as a judge before the show and now is that she isnt a "judge" so much as an "arbitrator" now. She still has her license and certifications, and her experience as a judge.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:25 PM
2

Soldiers and Vets protect oir way of life, and doing so often costs them more than anyone wants to give up. I would never compare what we do to the sacrifice they make. At the same time, our role is different. Our military protects our way of life, but us truckers and sailors and train engineers ensure that everyone has a society to live in. Without us, there would be no society to protect, and without our military, it would be one not worth upholding.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 06:32 AM
11

Get one with truck drivers for those of us over the road. 99% of us are men, we are often literally knee deep in mud and shit, we bleed on the job and just keep rolling. We have some of the highest mortality rates because almost snythung that goes wrong in our field is potentially fatal. We run this nation, and keep this society rolling. Every single piece of food and product you see in stores was on a truck at some point. Without us, hospitaks woukd shut down within a day. Without us, thousands…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:38 PM
4

Because this shit started in places like tumblr. Its this infantile, petty bullshit that gave the ideology its platform and led to the new wave rising in politics and academia. Without this petty, stupid shit, academics would still be batshit crazy, but it would be confined to their cult and not be this massive movement of thousand upon thousands of angry, loud, bitchy tiddlers marching through the streets.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:34 PM
8

Yes. Yes, they would (well, technically, they would show up to investigate, and chat for a bit). And when it tirns out nothing is going on, they'll likely apologize and leave. And depending on the circunstances, the caller may or may not be charged with a crime for their false report.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 10:34 PM
45

There are women, but they stay on the ground in thick raincoats holding signs. I live in an area with a lot of emergency work going on after a string of tornadoes, and theres one crew that has two women. I havd never seen them do anything other than hold stop signs to control traffic. If you ever wanted to know what a "diversity hire" looks like, that is it.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 08:04 PM
23

No its not. A university campus is not your property, its not your space. You have no rights to ownership or control of it.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 07:30 PM
2

Go to work, do your job, and be proud of yourself? It doesnt matter if other people give a fuck about your work, you should be proud of what you do and what you accomplish every day. Thats whu men wont do this shit, because we go to work, do our job, feel pride in our efforts, then enjoy our time off. Theres not enough hours in the day to act lime a little bitch because people dont fawn over us.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 06:13 PM
6

As far as I know, being a communist isn't illegal. Mandating overt gender discrimination normally is. Whether this is an exemption or, not, I don't know. But it shouldn't be.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 12:40 AM
4

Same here. I live in cincy but I might have to go all the way to Chicago just to see it. Maybe if there's enough interest, we could pull something together here or in Columbus?
/r/MensRights16/12/16 08:54 PM
11

No, some woman would accuse them of harassment, the person would get beat by white knights then arrested, and the pharmacy would start a GoFundMe campaign to "end gender violence."
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:29 PM
20

The owner of the pharmacy admits that what she is doing is illegal under New York law. Second to last paragraph.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:27 PM
7

Her statement "... Men shouldn't dismiss women's fears about rape" is the key. When trump made his analogy, he was tapping into the fear of Islamic terrorists using the refugee crisis as a gateway into the country. Whereas feminists are going on about the fear about rape that is perpetuated by a constant barrage of false statistics to make the issue seem more severe than it is. The hypocrisy went so far over her head that it wasn't just a "whoosh" but a fucking spaceship level "whoosh"
/r/MensRights22/09/16 05:44 PM
1

National Geographic has been around since the 1800s but its format and content have changed massively since then. Its not a difficult stretch to assume that a 100 year old magazine is going to be vastly different today than it was in the past.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 04:43 PM
21

The tourist is guilty," the witness said. "He was rude, and all she asked for was a tip." Yeah, keep telling yourself that.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 08:45 PM
3

The original reaction was mostly just "really? Why?" But the producers of the movie seized on that and started shouting "Sexist!" because they clearly anticipated this. Then the debate just devolved lower and lower until it became obvious the movie was produced the way it was to be a feminist statement, with no regard to respecting the original, and the critics just gave up on trying to be fair and respectful of the production.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:28 PM
-2

OP posted this: Yup. But look at this. If you're a man who accidentally shoots a woman, even if she's not killed or seriously injured, you still go to prison. Or this man who accidentally shot his son while trying to fend off a home invasion and got 4 years. Or this teenager who got 4.5 years in prison for accidentally shooting his friend. Or this teenage boy who got 3 years for accidentally shooting his friend. Or this man who accidentally shot and killed a teenage girl with a gun and now has t…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:12 PM
5

I love how its 3 or 4 years fpr killing a man, but over 10 years if the victim is a woman. Equality!
/r/MensRights08/01/16 11:11 PM
1

I know. Thats my point. Its a pathetic double standard. My name can be published, my life destroyed, and my career ruined because some idiot had a wet dream about me, and even if i could sue for defamation, it wont change anything. But even though she outright lied, the police covered it up, and all the evidence is in plain sight, she gets to walk away without a scratch.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 06:03 AM
6

Did nobody notice how the article mentions the men by their full names, but it censors the accusers name?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 09:32 AM
3

There is no plot to minority report.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:50 PM
1

Unfortunately, a LOT of pople see Salon and HuffPo as the most reliable news source because obviously its either Fox and CNN and MSNBC corporate anti-humanity mainstream news or "alternative" savior-of-the-world crap. And journalists just keep dividing further. I feel bad for the few truly neutral journalists who are reaigned to dying local newspapers.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 06:57 AM
1

I know the accused editor personally (Aiola) and I'm trying to get her response to this to see what she says. I have a feeling that this author is taking something out of context because I also looked at his twitter feed and can find no tweet he sent with a list of articles/statistics like he claims. That may just be due to my lack of experience with twitter, but it concerns me nonetheless.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 01:40 PM
1

High quality clickbait article, you mean.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 10:12 AM
25

structural issues which have led to the mental and physical breakdown of all the sabbatical officers”. Wow. Accused of bullying her fellow staff, and amidst all the resignation, does so AGAIN while saying that the investigation will exonerate her. Her resignation shouldn't be the end of this.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:59 AM
1

You wish. Fair is only fair if the non-white non-cis non-hetero non-male crowd has an advantage.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:15 AM
1

To pre-empt criticism and set the stage. They want people to know what the rhetoric is that they are countering.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 07:47 AM
4

The way I think of emotional labor goes as follows: there are certain jobs where it’s a requirement, where there is no training provided, and where there’s a positive bias towards certain people – women – doing it. It’s also the kind of work that is denigrated by society at large.” Lets play "would you rather" for a bit. Would you rather be a secretary or a "waste management specialist"? A police officer or a waitress? A carpenter or a store clerk? A dockworker or a concierge? Im so angry right …
/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:47 AM
1

This is actually a decent resource for people who are burning themselves out. The highlighted part is more stupid than narcissistic.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:12 AM
1

Honestly there are a lot of adults who need this sometimes. Plenty of people get stressed with their dsily lives and get burned out, so something like this would be a good little reminder that you are more important than your job. Hell, reading through this made me realize how overworked I am, so its not a lost cause. I dont really see a problem with the highlighted item other than it being a stupid way to raise your self-esteem. Instead of taking a photo and expecting people to praise you, mayb…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:11 AM
2

I know. All i really said was that it was funny that its the Daily Beast arguing against clickbait.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 10:16 PM
4

This article was all about the downfall of internet media, and it was completely and unarguably right. Amazingly, it came from The Daily Beast.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 09:56 PM
2

If I remember correctly, it was Argentina.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 11:51 AM
4

Id like to point out one single problem with your arguments. Carrying mace, or any weapon is a reasonable thing for many people regardless of gender, if they live in an area that is known for having crime. If someone feels that the possibility of being a victim of crime is real, then there is nothing wrong with having something to protect themselves, or at least give them a feeling of security. The problem comes with the underlying ideology of some women that every man who gets near them is a ra…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 08:55 AM
4

Which is the original point of the name. It's sad that it became an extension of the PUA movement. The term really is fitting, given the correct context as opposed to the degenerate redneck trash that populates the subreddit.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 11:36 AM
1

Absolutely not. And I never said we did.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 10:51 PM
1

A common criticism of all religions is they support suppression of women and so on. For example, feminists argue that since women cannot hold leadership roles in the Catholic church, that is mysoginistic. Also the idea that a wife is subservient to her husband, a woman cannot initiate a divorce against her husband, a rape victim must marry her rapist, and so on. Even though modern day people around the world reject these ideas, they are still present in the holy books and often in church doctrin…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 10:51 PM
3

No it doesnt, but context does help us to understand the situation and make informed decisions and/or commentary.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 04:54 AM
13

From the last protest, it was simply protests against the Catholic church for its mysoginistic traditions. But these people think what they are doing is somehow justified.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:06 AM
5

The sexism in this article is infuriating. There is solid useful advice on negotiating that has nothing to do with gender, yet somehow it only applies to women, and further, women who arent rich.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 09:03 AM
1

I can only assume your comment is related to your username. I actually wanna see more.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:15 AM
8

Probably because you are so far out of the loop, but not everyone is American or cares about our government, so I think you are fine. Although if you are American, you really should be laying attention because this shit is important.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:14 AM
15

Its also how you can explicitely say something is a womans problem. "The gender pay gap is a woman problem" "rape is a woman problem" "breast cancer is a woman problem" "reproductive healthcare is a woman problem" even though this overlooks how none of that is true. Gender pay gap is a lie, men get raped, men can get breast cancer, and men are 50% of the requirement for reproduction, meaning we also need reproductive care. But mens problems? "mass incarceration is a man problem" no, because a lo…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:12 AM
7

Whens the release date and who can I contact to talk to about being boots on the ground for local promotion of the film? Where I live there is a huge focus on boys and men right now and I would like to use that momentum to really push MRAs into the focus of the media. Having a documentary that evokes a reaction will really do that and I would love to be a part of it.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:38 AM
6

/#feminismsofragile they need to resort to cheap attacks because they have no substantive arguments. Can we make this a thing?
/r/MensRights01/10/15 10:37 AM
-1

No, but the people in control may decide to make changes that adversely affect the call center. Thats what I meant by collateral damage.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:11 AM
21

Something to keep in mind is that the operations and call center have no control over the marketing. Its great that they provide the appropriate service, and if that is consistent (as in it wasnt simply that you were lucky and got the only calp center employee who cares) then it shows a huge failure in one specific division. Fpcus your efforts on the division responsible. Avoid collateral damage to the operations people who really do their jobs right.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:46 AM
3

I wont be surprised if this has the opposite effect and breaks down the fight for net neutrality. Im almost liable to come up with some conspiracy that this whole thing is actually a ploy by anti-neutrality groups coughverizoncoughattcough to garner support for their cause without supporting them. Way too many people are fooled by this stupidity for us to succeed. Im terrified to think that all the effort put into protecting our freedom is going to go to waste because all the people putting that…
/r/MensRights27/09/15 03:08 PM
12

I actually recently "recovered" a memory from middle school. Two girls tried to rape me once during 6th grade. I got away because they knew when I started threatening to fight back that I would do it, and hurt them. But I never said anything because everyone, even the school administration had... negative views of me, and this would have made it worse.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 07:08 PM
3

I cant read the article because the site keeps fucking up on mobile. these people need to stop being so fucking stupid with their mobile sites and just let us read the damn articles in peace.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 04:28 PM
2

It may be a joke but its dressed as a news headline (granted, in a cukture magazine instead of a news site) which makes it hard to see it as such. And knowing Vice and the other sites like it, I bet you its 100% serious.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 01:23 PM
2

Devils advocate says that many jurisdictions classify verbal altercations as assault, but still...
/r/MensRights20/09/15 05:07 PM
1

Most cameras dont capture audio, which allegedly was the "aggressive" behavior, so they would be useless.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:46 AM
2

From the article, he was just doing his job. The rules say you cant do something, it is my job (Im a security officer myself) to make sure those rules arent broken. He followed his instructions. Told them they couldnt access an area he controlled access to, but did not try to enforce anything - he never made a demand of them. And also from the article, it said his aggression was simply his tone of voice. At MOST his punishment should be a write-up, assuming they are telling the truth. It terrifi…
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:44 AM
4

Every single comment of hers is the same self-contradicting doublespeak. This is either a highly skilled troll or someone who I would nornally say needs serious psychiatric help, except that shes so far gone, it wont be of any use.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:00 AM
12

Unfortunately, not really. Have there been any cases of a false accusatipn victim successfully being awarded damages/restitution because of the accusation? Has a victim gone to court and been allowed to conplete his education after being expelled over Title IX? Has an accuser ever been punished similar to the victim of the accusation? And yet plenty of people have tried. There was a link a few weeks ago about a lawyer who specializes in these cases and she said that all the victim can do is give…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 07:17 AM
7

Elliot has the right to pursue a civil claim and I believe (not sure) he can use the verdict and transcripts of his criminal case as evidence. The problem is the likelihood of him winning. The judge will probably take one look at the case and deny his claim because they'll be supporters of the "poor, innocent victims he abused so horribly with his mean, mean words on Twitter."
/r/MensRights13/09/15 10:57 AM
2

Its actually a well done interview for a change. He tries to stretch it at some points, claiming this case is similar to some of the anti-gay discrimination cases, but other than easily-identifiable and filterable bias, its a good piece.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 10:48 AM
12

And more importantly, he needs to be awarded damages and reparations for this whole affair. Losing everything and falling into debt over 100k because of a tweet is the real crime being committed here. Its like telling you that you should get life in prison for calling someone a bitch on the street... after she trashed your car.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 10:40 AM
5

Which is the same with any encyclopedia. Encyclopedia Brittanica isnt going to have an accurate depiction of the ongoing Syrian Civil War any more than Wikipedia will. Encyclopedias and other reference sources are not supposed to be one-stop-shop information outlets, they are references to be used in conjunction with other sources.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 01:34 AM
0

Did you overlook the fact that you can still be detained without charge? They can hold a suspect for up to 24 hours in some places for no reason, and almost always there is no recourse because it wasnt an arrest. Its better to give an alibi or just state the truth in cases like this rather than act like a dick and refuse to cooperate even when doing so would make the problem go away.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:29 AM
3

They can arrest you for refusing to comply. Its called obstruction of justice/investigation/etc. Also, they have the right to detain you without charge for up to 24 hours if there is reasonable suspicion you commited a crime. So if you have an actual reason to do what you were doing that in no way could be construed as illegal (in this case, being on-site at a location because its your fucking job) then theres no reason to refuse to cooperate with the police.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:27 AM
19

I think the difference is that in Korea, they are more aware of reality in regards to how most violent crime and sexual crime is perpetrated by close relations rather than at random. Here in the (West) we willfully blind ourselves to that idea and let the media fool us into thinking that sexual crimes are always perpetrated by strangers because its too uncomfortable to admit that your mother or brother or w/e is molesting you, and that it isn't some isolated one-time thing.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:24 AM
1

A followup is that the clinician still has the right to institute their own requirements above the legal ones, so a lawsuit against the clinic or doctor would still be valid. But op would have to find a judge that understands that sexual discrimination also includes discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:16 PM
1

What good would a lawsuit against the state do? This doctor is a private citizen with a private enterprise. How does the government even factor into this?
/r/MensRights05/09/15 07:56 AM
2

Not to mention this lpgic would extend to allowing men to finally have the right to decide whether to carry a pregnancy to term.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 07:54 AM
8

(On mobile, so cant use quotes) The whole article complains about a man using this anti-discrimination act to allow men into women-only groups, but in one paragraph supports use of the act to force wome into "San Diego boys clubs." That one sentence was where i gave up because the hypocracy was so blatant i just couldnt keep reading.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 10:09 AM
2

And dont forget how its never the person who had the sex that claims rape, its always her friends that tell her after the fact. Which is another issue nobody mentions. I guess this is part of slut-shaming that a woman's friends are so desperate to not be associated with a woman who has casual sex that they will manipulate her into accusing her partner of rape even when she acknowledges consent, and the only person in the entire case that gets hurt is the falsely accused. No punishment for the ac…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 01:14 AM
7

She has no grounds here. I can't read minds, and neither can you. If a woman (or man) consents to something verbally, or they indicate consent through body language, how is their partner supposed to know they actually don't consent. "What they feel" is meaningless when "what they say/do" is something else entirely, considering there's no way of knowing what goes on in someone's head when it's nodding up and down, and she's already naked on the bed with a smile on her face. If you don't want sex,…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 07:41 PM
2

It's a bit more complex, and not easily generalized. The appropriate system would use alimony or support as punitive or supplementary systems. Punitive against men who do something wrong, or supplementary when a man agreed to the obligations of parenthood then later decides to rescind his agreement. My dad was a deadbeat, for example. He was violent, abusive, and wasted his money on drugs. Child support was more of a punishment against him for his abuse and his abandonment of us. On the other ha…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 12:30 AM
2

*if only all networks were as tough on everybody as they were on the GOP that one time during the debate.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:53 PM
6

I'm not sure who you refer to, but the only people who say you "must" be okay with it is radfem assholes. Personally, I have had period sex with my fiance plenty of times, but we have a relationship that allows for that to be something I'm comfortable with. I wasn't willing to do it under any circumstances for the first few years of this relationship, so it's not like I want blood on my dick. If you aren't up to it, then you aren't up to it, you definitely are the majority there. Most men are no…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:37 PM
6

That explains why the university even let the program get past the initial discussion stage, then. I knew there was a catch.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 03:03 AM
2

Not detailed, I know thats unreasonable. But I would say one solution would be to put a page on his site dedicated to his broadcasts that lists a summary of whatever he talked about, and link the sources there. Since most of his sources are other websites (I don't criticize that), just a simple summary like: "In this segment of this episode we talked about the issue of California's Green Party and their sick portrayal of men - source: link to the original image" And I advocate the same for many …
/r/MensRights08/08/15 01:43 AM
0

I saw the evidence, and I do listen to his show. I don't listen to him every day, true, nutbas much as I can. Most ofbthe time when I hear him cite sources, he says something like "my contact in the department of defense" or "a report released that ill link to later" and I'm never able to find the link. An unnamed source isn't a reliable source, and the same rule applies to other media. If the story or quote comes from an anonymous source, I consider it as a possibility, but not a strong one. An…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 05:28 PM
1

Its an InfoWars article, so the facts are almost assuredly fabricated. I don't dispute the photo, I dispute the facts in the article that aren't clear in the photo, especially since Jones never actually gives sources. I could go on for several pages about this site and its owner, but I hope you already know enough to understand what I am saying. As for the actual content of the photo, I find it very hard to believe it to be real and not some photoshopped image designed to create outrage. Unfortu…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 07:46 AM
1

Me neither. Who knew that NOT being doxxed would make me feel bad.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 05:14 AM
11

I don't. It isn't any different than the existing standard. If black people began practicing mass hatred against white people, how does that make them better than the post-abolition-era south? Leaders like MLK had the right idea: do not embrace hatred and violence, champion your cause through peaceful protest, civil disobedience, and passive resistance. In terms of social class, what benefit do we get if the working class were to just practice mass hatred against the upper classes? Sure, the wor…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:57 PM
12

Her reaction in the broadcast is amazing. She actually stops her interview to start a fight over this damn meme on her own program. She should be the one being fired for dropping her professionalism and starting a conflict with the poor guy. Plus, he wasn't even the person responsible for the whole mess, she came after him and started harassing him about his opinion with absolutely no provocation. To make it even worse, somebody actually went on a witch hunt against this man for the express purp…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:22 PM
3

There's research that shows women are more likely to be the aggressor in non-reciprocal IPV. There is a link somewhere around this subreddit that links to that, but I don't have time right now to find it. It said something like 60% of non-reciprocal violence is committed by women - but it includes same-sex partner relationships as well, so the data may be slightly skewed.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:04 PM
0

It sounded like a group of women laughing, but in the clip of the applause, it was a good mix of people. So maybe the laughter was a select group of people?
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:02 PM
1

I agree with you there, I just wanted to point out that many social welfare programs catch all sorts of people. Its sad that these programs have become a way to attack a single race. It feels like a brilliant way to get rid of them. Make one side hate the prpgrams because they prop up welfare queens (code word for black women), and make the other side hate the programs because they promote the rhetoric of the first. Meanwhile, those of us on these programs are silenced and told our voices dont c…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:22 PM
1

I don't know what FRL has to do with minorities. When I was in school, I was on that program and I'm white. FRL is not a racial issue, it's a socio-economic issue. Yes, black families tend to be worse off on average in that regard, but the 'why' behind that is deeper than the color of their skin. In my community, we had a pretty level field in terms of that because a lot of students were 'white trash' kids from backwater families, and in the suburb I lived in we had a healthy mix of races, I don…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:21 AM
14

Not even that. I'm 21, a father, and can't find any work because almost nobody is hiring and I don't qualify for the positions that are, so I'm trying to start my own contracting business. According to the Small Business Administration (sba.gov), I qualify for a whopping 0 government grants for small businesses because I am not a woman, nor am I a native american, nor am I a minority race. So while my girlfriend could qualify for $5,000 - $10,000 (not sure the exact number) for her vagina, I hav…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:15 AM
1

Sorry im late. I wanted to say that her industry isnt the only one. Yes, in general, its bullshit. A hard job is always going to pay more. But in certain industries (entertainment, hospitality, just two specific examples i can support) there is a wage gap. There are several reasons, and several thing we can do to fix them, but we shouldnt just throw a blanket denial and say the issue doesnt exist at all. Id like to make a point that a lot of people claim the wage gap is due to women not being in…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:25 PM
3

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/12/05/sony_pictures_hack_reveals_gender_pay_gap_at_the_entertainment_company_and.html Not every gender pay gap is fake. And before you go downvoting me and throwing me out of the conversation for providing a fact, know that I am an MRA and support the MRA arguments, but we need to stick to facts and actual problems or we just turn into what we are trying to fight against.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 02:00 PM
1

Not about the military, but about the media using women in ads. I work in the media. We use women in ads because women are the MARKET WE TARGET. No advertiser is going to target men because we dont have spending power: the vast majority of men only go shopping for specific items and domt browse. Ads dont work on them. On the other hand, women go to the store and spend their time browsing the merchandise and usually buying something they didnt plan. So marketing is gynocentric because of this. Wh…
/r/MensRights14/11/14 03:12 AM
7

Could someone summarize this? I dont understand whats going on here.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 06:25 PM
4

In your opinion, would it make more sense to make the rule apply to anyone, instead of being exclusive to a specific gender? I understand that the rule protects the men from potential problems, but why not just make it a stamdard rule, instead of singling out men? In the same vein, do you not think that having this exlusive rule actually perpetuates the very stereotype we want to see changed? And if it does, how does keeping it in its current exclusive form have any long term benefit to men in s…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 05:10 AM
4

I really like the not-so-subtle symbolism of the axe dug into the head.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 11:00 PM
3

I had the fortune of being denied entry to national guard due to a disability, but still had to sign up for selective service. So my leg is a hinderance that prevents me from serving on a search and rescue crew, but its not a problem if they want to send me to some oil filled desert to kill civilians over some stupid grudge? Huh.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 05:56 PM
2

I feel so honored to have a troll respond to a post I made. Im getting reddit famous!
/r/MensRights19/07/14 04:07 AM
6

And yet has half as many likes as the most sexist comment in the photo (3k to 6k). Oh wait, its not sexist if the victim is a man.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 02:26 PM
2

If I remember correctly, the US department of justice has statistics that show women to be more likely to be the aggressor in non-reciprocal domestic violence claims.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 07:53 PM
10

me too! my fathers day gift came y'all days early: I became a father!
/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:53 PM
2

no, ive been a part of everything. she just doesnt know how to asset herself, and the nurse on that shift was blocking me. the new shift nurses all gave me unrestricted access to her unless she was being actively cared for, and I was present for the birth. there were complications, and they gave me even more unrestricted access, but I had to leave because I couldnt do anything at the time and needed to sleep. everyone is fine now and im going back tomorrow to finalize everything
/r/MensRights14/06/14 03:19 AM
1

are they required to inform her if that release? as far as I know, we were never given any information about an option like that
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:31 PM
1

the doctor made sure I was there and everything was done as she directed at his office. check my posts, im about to post a photo of them
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:58 PM
5

they finally called me in when her contractions got worse and she started getting... angry. nothing like an angry woman having labor pains.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:45 PM
5

they had a shift change and the nurse this shift isn't giving me problems
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:40 AM
1

I just want to be sure (above all that he stays healthy and safe and happy, of course) that he grows up with a healthy relationship with both me and my love (were not married yet)
/r/MensRights13/06/14 09:30 AM
1

I'm allergic to tobacco
/r/MensRights13/06/14 09:28 AM
1

im so excited but at the same time scared shitless and confused. not just about whats going on right now (ive been exhausted and on the verge of tears for hours) but I dont know if I can bond properly. my dad was... not a good dad. I dont have any role models
/r/MensRights13/06/14 09:09 AM
3

I'll be sure to ask to see the policy in writing. I didn't think of that.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:55 AM
3

I don't even know if a doctor is present. I only saw nurses whenever I went in, the only doctor I ever saw on the ward was ours, and that was only when he was handling a patient. but right now, its 5 in the morning and she's likely asleep. I'll try again later when its a better time for her.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:46 AM
2

some of these things I agree with (I would love to have a daughter who enjoys carpentry and other similar activities, and im a man who loves to cook, and I actually dont mind cleaning/being a stay-at-home dad. oops, did I break a gender role there?) but I find so much wrong with this article. why is any of this feminist? how is treating your children the same regardless of gender being feminist? why is that not just being a parent? if my son likes to play with cooking set toys, then I let him! I…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:34 AM
1

That's why I'm asking which alternative system you would prefer. My comment on democracy is that all the systems have their own problems, its just a matter of finding the one with the best chance of reflecting the will of the people.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 08:25 PM
1

Do you think the European voting system is better? I'm not being condescending, I want to know what people think is a good alternative. for me, any other system is better than ours. I can't remember who this quote is attributed to but it is said that democracy is the worst form of government, except that all the others have been tried.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 07:44 PM
1

Doesn't matter. I doubt whoever opposes her would be any better. Personally, I vote for whoever shows the most promise, and has the best track record. But oh well.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 05:49 PM
10

I like putting it into context, but the context doesn't make it any better. It actually makes it worse. Domestic violence affects men too, men are also displaced as refugees, etc. Women aren't the only ones who face these problems. My mom was a domestic violence victim, but so was I. I was also the victim of violence perpetrated by women, at school. Guess who got punished and who got rewarded for standing up for themselves?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:58 PM
6

This has been happening for a long time, and its the fault of the last several presidents. Race, gender, party affiliation, none of that matters because they all had a hand in putting us where we are today, not to mention that it wasn't the president alone who made this, it was also congress and the supreme court. It doesn't really matter who we put in office because in the end, we'll only end up the losers. I had a lot of hope for Obama, and I thought he would finally fix some (not all, not man…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:55 PM
3

That's generally a good idea for any article you want to discuss. This one only takes about two minutes to read, though.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 12:14 PM
43

Bombarding her like that doesn't do much. You should put some space between each question to give time (or at least the illusion of it) for the candidate/intern/volunteer to respond. Doing this just irritates everyone and destroys any validity you have.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 06:43 PM
1

Ok. Now I think I understand. This whole thing is a mess.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:40 PM
1

The first part I know, and 4chan being involved explains a lot. But this new development confuses me. Is this twitter post supposed to be some kind of blacklist or whitelist?
/r/MensRights16/12/13 05:56 PM
1

Could you or someone explain to me what is going on? I read the article that started all this, and I am a programmer myself so I understand (sort of) what the article said. But I just ignored it once a github project started. Whats the gist (sorry, no pun intended) of this whole thing?
/r/MensRights15/12/13 07:49 PM
2

I guess I'm fortunate then. I'm with my girlfriend and go with her to every appointment (were on 14 weeks). The doctor we go to explicitly makes sure I'm paying attention tk what he tells her and makes sure that both of us are on the same level before we leave. And when he went to the hospital, I was given security clearance to the ER while she was inside, even though were unmarried. It seems that where I live, doctors seem to be very serious about maintaining relationships. I just hope we never…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 02:54 PM
5

Legitimate curiosity. Are you a university student? While there are "good" feminists, there are also "good" republicans/democrats (depending on which side you're on). The problem is the exceptionally loud crowd of radicals. The ones who say things like to murder every baby boy to empower baby girls and other ridiculous shit like that. Nobody steps in to say that this rhetoric goes too far, and so these people feel that they have authority. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 02:08 PM
1

I just think that if someone deliberately disobeys a justified order from the court, they should be held accountanle for their actions.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:28 PM
1

What about people who run from the law, not showing up for a court date or parole, etc. Should those crimes involve jail time as well? Violent crime isn't the only kind that is harmful. Although he did commit plenty kf that and got away with it, but I figured that bit is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:17 PM
-1

Honestly, in my dads case, yes. He would jump from job to job and house to house to not pay, and he spent all of his earnings on drugs and alcohol instead. I don't know any other stories like mine, but the trouble he made my mom and family go through definitely is worth jail time.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:11 PM
0

In the interest of fairness, hiw many of those can we assume are based in fact (my dad was a deadbeat who did everything possible to not pay child support, we can assume at least some of these cases are legitimate)
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:54 PM
5

I only read the duluth model so far and I don't know if I can get through the whole list. What gets me is that the "research" that proves such a one sided system is completely inaccurate. So people who follow it are less likely to abuse than people who don't follow any other program? No shit. What about other programs? Are abusers who seek treatment for underlying causes (such as alcoholism and drug addiction, in the case of my dad) more likely to repeat offenses or less likely than those who ge…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:15 AM
2

There's still quality journalism around, but its hard to find. Local news sites/papers/stations have some really good people. In puerto rico, we have some really bad journalism, but we also have Eneid Route-Gomez, Julio Saniel, and others like them. They are not well known because they don't generate eye-catching headlines.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 07:47 PM
0

That was probably what it came out as, but is most definitely not what I intended. If you look through my post history (which you probably have), you'll realize how bad I am at conveying the idea I have. I'm very bad at communicating what I mean and I apologize for any distress or insult it may have caused. I think I clarified my intentions, but as usual, I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:18 PM
3

When did I accuse anybody of doing anything? Again, I was just saying that he's not alone and its not exclusive to men. Sometimes people who have been hurt forget that they aren't alone and other people have been through the same pain. I'm actually supporting him by reminding him that he's not alone, while at the same time reminding this community that some things are gender neutral, because often we get so caught up in trying to vilify half the population of the world that we forget or willfull…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:35 PM
1

I can't say either way, all I meant was that I know women who have then same perspective that you do, regardless.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:07 PM
11

Just to keep in in perspective - women could say the same thing about men. I personally don't see my relationship going bad, but I know women who say exactly what you just said, only with the genders reversed. I'm not putting you down or anything like that, just adding some perspective.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:43 PM
1

This has to be parody. There is no way in hell any person can read that and actually find any of it to be serious.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:16 AM
0

I honestly don't care either way.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:46 AM
2

I thought they already did that with spray-on tans?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:06 AM
4

I think your reading too much into this. Its a positive message, for once, and somehow its a subtle sexist tyrade?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 11:43 PM
2

When did this conversation get to corruption?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 04:57 AM
2

If he took bribes, I was not aware of that. And I never said that it was a bigger ethical issue than corruption, I said it was an ethical issue.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 02:26 AM
2

What does that have to do with the personal attacks on the man, degrading him in the way they did? Couldn't they have made just as much an impact by saying he was some kind of annoying political activist or something similar? ... Actually, probably not. But I still would like an answer to my first question: whatever his motive, how does attacking and degrading him prove their point?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:54 AM
-15

And shaking their hand, or giving them a hug (a common form of introduction in many cultures) isn't getting in their personal space? And what about if she has perfume on that you can smell a mile away (maybe her own damn fragrance line that some cosmetics company shoved into our faces for weeks), does smelling her still require getting "in her personal space." The fact that you still can't understand this says two things. 1) You very clearly missed the point of the post, or you're just a troll 2…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:51 AM
1

I was referring to the kind of "internet feminism" that we see so often now. I know that there are feminists who would fall in very well here, pursuing equal rights. Sadly, the "modern" feminist movement as a whole is not so well-intentioned.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:55 AM
2

Strangely enough, these feminists claim that the idea of women as homemakers and child-rearers is a degrading image perpetuated by the "patriarchy," and yet they perpetuate it themselves when it serves their ends.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:22 AM
1

I find it ironic that the person has the last name Koch, but that's not important. What is important is how this post pretty much says exactly what that best-of post was talking about. I'm sure we all have read that post by now, but I don't have a link, sorry.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:19 AM
1

I read this totally different. The article is basically calling people to attack the wife for playing the political game. I agree that when someone disgraces themselves like this, they need to grow up and face the consequences head-on. And yeah, the author mentions the term "male politicians" which can be construed as a sexist phrase. But that's the only sexist phrase here. So what is the problem? That politicians can get away with shit like this and come back even stronger. That we can let some…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 01:00 AM
2

The sad part is that there are women like my mom who were much more effective at accomplishing the military's goals. She was an expert marksman with every weapon she handled, and she was physically more capable than all of the men in her unit. The whole mess and the bullshit with the sexual harassment is, in my opinion, an example of the brass not giving a flying fuck about their obligations to the soldiers underneath them. Its a distraction, but I don't see it as the fault of women, I see it as…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:15 PM
1

What I've seen through history was really just the application of the "women serve men" or at least on the face of it. Maybe that's just because of revisionism. That's why I was a feminist male for a while until I realized just how messed up the system is today (in my opinion, again, its mostly the application of our laws and codes)
/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:32 PM
2

You assume that modern religious institutions treat women equally. One thing I'll give to the feminists: religion hasn't changed. And it won't.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:30 AM
10

We know. In my case, I had to back off then come back later to analyze the poster. It hit be like a motherfucking freight train at first. And this is at an air base? I can't imagine how the men on base react to this. Thinking about a man being called to duty and on his way to briefing, gets slapped in the face with this, what's he gonna be thinking about when he should be paying attention to details that determine whether he lives or dies? I don't know anything about Scott, but my parents were b…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:28 AM
6

We love having women here just as much as we love having men here. In fact, many strong MRM supporters are women. As long as you allow argument and disagreement and carry on discussion instead of bashing, you'll be fine. If you don't believe that women are MRM supporters, ask many of us here. My fiancé in particular is a strong supporter of the movement, because she's seen firsthand how the issues we discuss affect how she is treated compared to how I'm treated. I'd go on but I gotta go
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:03 PM
11

The rationalwiki is full of sarcasm, this article borders between their serious articles and their sarcastic ones. Parts of it treat the issue with clarity, other sections of the article (like this one) use sarcasm, at least in part. Keep in mind that not everyone who identifies as an MRA has these: when you hear a feminist blogger talk about MRAs, those who have these are what they're usually talking about. It apparently did not cross their minds not to lump the ones who do not have these chara…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:49 PM
2

I disagree with you on two points. 1) The first argument, in my opinion, is not sexism, its just selfishness. It's the same logic that says self-defense means killing them before they kill you. You don't need to go to such extremes, but I'm not gonna argue that topic because it's not relevant here 2) I disagree with you on when life begins, but again, not relevant to this discussion. What I do agree is that there is clear and obvious sexism in that conversation. Not in the original comment you r…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:24 PM
0

As much as I see this in real life (that who a woman becomes interested in is directly related to his income), the chart is very difficult to interpret in context. For example, it could be data from a dating website, and people's criteria for who they choose to interact with on a dating website is often vastly different than who they would interact with on the street. Imagine that you see a woman on the street who looks nice, but is not really pretty, unless you had another reason to talk to her…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 01:37 AM
7

These kinds of things just really piss me off. Not only does it cause damage to the man involved (I'm sure most of the people there automatically declared you guilty on the spot, which doesn't help you at all, even if the girl was reprimanded properly), it fosters the whole "false rape" culture. That, in turn, hurts women who actually do get raped, since the resources often get diverted away from those cases (plenty of cases in particular I can give you where a woman was raped, and ignored, beca…
/r/MensRights09/07/13 02:04 PM
5

My mom was like that. She cheated on my dad, then demanded a divorce because he was an alcoholic/physically abusive (he was, not just to her, but to me as well), but when he brought up her indiscretions to try and preserve his rights to see us, she turned it around and claimed he cheated on her. The court decided all fault was on him, and she was (essentially) a perfect example of a parent. He ended up getting addicted to all sorts of drugs after that, fell into depression, and died homeless (he…
/r/MensRights30/06/13 05:19 PM
2

The sad part is she probably justifies her actions because of him. My mom is like that, she complains about how all men are deadbeats and the whole "kids don't need dads, moms do everything anyway" to me, and I'm planning on having a child of my own in the next few years... I'm a guy, so you can imagine how this whole thing makes me feel; I am afraid of living around other people, or having my family get involved in anything because I know that I'll just be the go-to scapegoat for anything that …
/r/MensRights30/06/13 05:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter