TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dicipres Archive

View 118 posts and 135 comments by dicipres on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
366

dicipres/r/MensRights07/06/12 07:40 PM
315

dicipres/r/MensRights20/07/12 10:18 PM
116

dicipres/r/MensRights07/05/12 11:18 PM
66

dicipres/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:36 PM
66

dicipres/r/MensRights13/07/12 08:53 PM
46

dicipres/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:25 PM
42

dicipres/r/MensRights12/06/12 12:32 AM
38

dicipres/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:52 AM
32

dicipres/r/MensRights02/04/13 12:20 PM
29

dicipres/r/TheRedPill07/03/13 03:42 PM
25

dicipres/r/MensRights21/03/12 09:34 PM
24

dicipres/r/MensRights13/06/12 10:16 PM
22

dicipres/r/TheRedPill03/03/13 06:24 PM
21

dicipres/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:10 PM
21

Red Pill Theorydicipres/r/TheRedPill16/08/13 06:58 AM
21

Red Pill Theorydicipres/r/TheRedPill31/08/13 05:35 PM
20

dicipres/r/MensRights01/06/12 09:12 PM
17

dicipres/r/MensRights05/04/12 05:20 PM
16

dicipres/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:05 PM
16

Red Pill Theorydicipres/r/TheRedPill19/04/13 07:52 AM
14

Red Pill Theorydicipres/r/TheRedPill25/04/13 07:18 AM
14

Red Pill Theorydicipres/r/TheRedPill04/08/13 08:31 AM
14

dicipres/r/MensRights31/05/12 04:59 PM
13

dicipres/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:40 PM
13

dicipres/r/MensRights29/06/12 11:26 PM
12

dicipres/r/MensRights01/05/12 04:44 PM
12

dicipres/r/MensRights06/06/12 09:25 PM
11

dicipres/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:09 PM
11

Off Topicdicipres/r/TheRedPill17/03/13 07:53 PM
11

dicipres/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:07 AM
10

dicipres/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:02 PM
10

dicipres/r/MensRights06/06/12 07:46 PM
10

dicipres/r/MensRights04/06/13 10:29 AM
10

dicipres/r/MensRights05/06/12 07:26 PM
9

dicipres/r/MensRights04/06/12 08:30 PM
9

dicipres/r/MensRights05/04/12 09:31 PM
8

dicipres/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:17 AM
8

dicipres/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:11 PM
8

dicipres/r/MensRights05/06/12 09:46 PM
7

dicipres/r/MensRights03/09/12 08:20 AM
7

Red Pill Theorydicipres/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 07:48 AM
7

dicipres/r/MensRights29/06/12 04:53 PM
6

dicipres/r/MensRights24/04/12 09:57 PM
6

dicipres/r/MensRights31/05/12 08:35 PM
6

dicipres/r/MensRights18/11/12 06:17 AM
6

dicipres/r/MensRights23/03/12 08:59 PM
6

dicipres/r/MensRights23/04/12 08:21 PM
6

dicipres/r/MensRights23/03/12 04:48 AM
6

dicipres/r/MensRights23/03/12 12:11 AM
6

dicipres/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:42 PM
6

dicipres/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:38 PM
6

dicipres/r/MensRights03/04/12 10:01 PM
5

dicipres/r/MensRights13/04/12 10:19 PM
5

dicipres/r/MensRights31/05/12 11:46 PM
5

Red Pill Theorydicipres/r/TheRedPill16/05/13 06:02 PM
5

dicipres/r/MensRights05/04/12 05:37 PM
5

dicipres/r/MensRights19/04/12 06:00 PM
5

dicipres/r/MensRights05/07/12 10:01 PM
5

Red Pill Theorydicipres/r/TheRedPill20/06/13 07:03 PM
5

dicipres/r/MensRights14/04/12 04:53 PM
4

dicipres/r/MensRights07/05/12 10:35 PM
4

dicipres/r/MensRights14/06/12 05:28 PM
4

dicipres/r/MensRights06/06/12 12:12 AM
4

dicipres/r/MensRights25/04/12 06:15 PM
4

dicipres/r/MensRights25/06/12 05:31 PM
3

Red Pill Theorydicipres/r/TheRedPill08/06/13 03:21 PM
3

dicipres/r/MensRights13/04/12 05:37 AM
3

dicipres/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 08:50 AM
3

dicipres/r/MensRights30/05/12 06:01 PM
3

dicipres/r/MensRights22/03/12 09:08 PM
3

dicipres/r/MensRights28/10/12 06:42 AM
3

dicipres/r/MensRights05/06/12 06:34 PM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:00 PM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights16/05/12 06:41 PM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:33 PM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights04/05/12 11:32 PM
2

dicipres/r/TheRedPill09/02/13 05:00 PM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:20 PM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights16/10/12 07:28 AM
2

dicipres/r/TheRedPill14/01/13 09:38 AM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:01 PM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:39 AM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights07/05/12 10:07 PM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights05/04/12 04:54 PM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights14/06/12 11:49 PM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:28 PM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights30/03/12 04:13 PM
2

dicipres/r/MensRights05/06/12 06:48 PM
1

dicipres/r/MensRights29/03/12 07:14 PM
1

dicipres/r/seduction30/04/12 06:21 PM
1

dicipres/r/MensRights13/04/12 05:54 PM
1

dicipres/r/MensRights13/04/12 05:35 PM
1

dicipres/r/TheRedPill07/01/13 10:26 AM
1

Blue Pill Exampledicipres/r/TheRedPill24/09/13 07:32 AM
1

dicipres/r/MensRights31/05/12 05:57 PM
1

dicipres/r/MensRights07/05/12 10:32 PM
1

dicipres/r/MensRights09/04/13 10:45 AM
1

dicipres/r/MensRights03/04/12 11:45 PM
1

dicipres/r/MensRights03/04/12 09:38 PM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights25/03/12 11:28 PM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights02/04/12 07:28 PM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:40 PM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:15 AM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:25 PM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:21 PM
0

dicipres/r/TheRedPill18/03/13 12:54 PM
0

dicipres/r/TheRedPill07/02/13 11:31 AM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights15/05/12 09:24 PM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:24 PM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:54 AM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:19 AM
0

Red Pill Theorydicipres/r/TheRedPill04/06/13 06:30 AM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:13 PM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:46 PM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights13/06/12 10:19 PM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:41 PM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights22/03/12 12:03 AM
0

dicipres/r/MensRights03/04/12 07:50 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Well there is a difference between school (which is based on public funds and controlled by politics to get an "optimal" result) and private business. Actually, we shouldn't really care about non-regulated or non-publicly financed activities of private businesses. As long as they don't write laws on how a business should run they should be able to manage their company like they wish. In the end they act to maximize profits and any "gender\race-politics" will just undermine profits since it will …
/r/TheRedPill16/09/13 06:29 AM
1

I don't hate anybody, or even identify with my 'ethnic group'. These ideas are just observations, not tool to facilitate nationalism. You should be able to think freely, even if it is painful.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/13 05:18 AM
0

"end badly for you. I will endeavor to make it so."? is that an internet threat? are you planing to hit me through the computer screen? how will it end badly exactly? I'm simply saying that humans feel more empathy to what reminds them of themselves. With or without "biological race," people who are genetically similar will tend to be physically similar and will tend to have more empathy for each other. I'm not saying it is "good" but only that this tendency exists. believe it or not, I don't ha…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 10:28 AM
0

Well, do explain how life have an innate value... "you sound like a nazi" isn't actually an argument
/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 08:05 AM
1

Thank you for your comment. I agree with that and this why I used "reproductive success" and not intercourse. Perhaps I'll make it more clear it in a future version.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/13 11:05 AM
-6

Thank you for your comment. I used these numbers as an illustration, as I did in other places in the text. I'll emphasize it or change the numbers in the future version to avoid confusion. I did not compared anybody to chimpanzees. If you wish to discredit the text keep to what is actually written. btw, the comparison to chimpanzees (with 96% similarity) is interesting since it points at another direction: humans tend to have more empathy to animals more similar to themselves, which cab be viewe…
/r/TheRedPill01/09/13 11:01 AM
1

I'll correct it. Thanks for the comments.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/13 10:30 AM
5

So what? his suicide does not make him less brilliant.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 05:58 AM
7

If it is not clear, this it satire. (Or the writer is actually insane.)
/r/TheRedPill18/03/13 08:24 AM
3

It is true that changes in birth control significantly affect reproduction, however, our biology changes much more slowly compared to our genes, and thus our emotional responses are determined by what was biologically true for much of human evolution, not the current state (the last few decades). E.g., if our emotions/genes would have been adapted to include the effects of birth control men would have no desire to ONS with condoms/pay for sex with prostitutes/porn/etc. In any case, thanks for th…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/13 06:15 AM
3

"When I see religion, I see Natural Law" is very true, the religious out-reproduce the atheists throughout the world. The atheists are smart enough to understand god is a lie, but not smart enough to understand why they were lied to and compete against religions. Maybe a red-pill society can do it.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/13 12:11 PM
14

Did anyone made a copy of this article? Look at the following quote: "The thing is, if I treat them as mutants, what’s stopping us from killing them? Empathy? Fear? Fear of hurting ourselves, or that it will destroy our soul to do so, because being violent to someone means cutting yourself from emotions, therefore being more dead inside? Would it be bad to kill them all? " I would inform the SPLC if I didn't knew it is a waste of time.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:05 AM
2

The lack of upvotes to this comment is a crime.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/13 11:56 AM
4

This is not r\feminism. We don't need to be inclusive and 'nice.' This should be a reddit to masculine hetro males (or at least non-fag males). Also, I don't think anything observed by a person should be taken too seriously. It might be just a projection of his suicidal sexuality. I hope this reddit will become a place for masculine men, written by masculine men, where everybody else is excluded (as it once was the case in similar 'clubs'). The manosphere should not utilize modern morality as a …
/r/TheRedPill16/01/13 12:50 PM
2

In Israel you can get jailed for several years for doing a paternity test...
/r/MensRights05/11/12 11:59 AM
1

Well, this is an interesting point. The message for young men is that gender-equality comes with a heavy price. If men will truly play by feminist rules and moral values, and refuse to have dominance or social status over women, their sexuality will be destroyed (just like communism destroys the economy for equality). Another point is that men should be aspire to have either swagger (dominant behavior) or prestige (higher social status\money) in order to fulfill their sexuality. BTW, The relatio…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 06:15 AM
-3

lots of name calling, no rebuttal...
/r/MensRights28/10/12 11:31 AM
-1

Masculine men have, by the definition I use here, more testosterone. Men with more testosterone are more dominant (which is supported by studies cited). Masculinity is innately related to dominance. "will happily ruin things for each other by depriving others of resources through their competition and pushing each other down hierarchies."- irrelevant to what I said.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 10:44 AM
2

How so? Traditionalism is "time tested" and you would expect to be adapted to biological nature
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:47 AM
6

I think you need to understand that the manosphere is not the MRM. Read Jack Donovan's latest post... http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/2012/09/long-live-the-manosphere/
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:46 AM
2

Well... feminists and humanists believe that "Biological differences are just as susceptible to social manipulation after the fact as any other aspect of human life" with the exception of being gay, that's the only innate immutable thing that's allowed to be biologically defined. The more general definition is that feminist believe in feminism like a religion. Also, have some respect to Roissy. The most influential writer in the manosphere deserves more that a "stupid article" and an argument wh…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:40 AM
6

For an adorable kitten life is easy
/r/MensRights05/09/12 06:36 AM
1

Hail grammar!
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:27 PM
3

If feminists want oxygen to achieve a feminist goal, than yes it is a tool of feminism.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 03:00 PM
0

"Why do you get to call this person 'feminist scum'?" Since I don't need your approval, I'll "get to say" whatever I want. And frankly, my level of alienation is such that I much prefer to go to prison with my head held high than act civil to feminists. "Civility is a virtue, fucking practice it." Only a really witty man or a full retard can write such a wonderfully ironic statement... You seem to be the latter.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 02:59 PM
2

If a group wants something to achieve a goal, this something is a tool of the group.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 01:13 PM
-3

I find it really amazing that feminist scum like yourself, while technically intelligent and always with good grammar..., you never ever truly question your own ideology. I'll try to start from the beginning since you in my eyes represent almost a caricature of the modern world. Everything we do and feel starts and ends in reproduction. Our feelings are created by our genes to reproduce the genes. There is nothing more, even if this is a sad realization. Your morals, humanism and equality is fak…
/r/MensRights03/09/12 12:47 PM
2

sad but true...
/r/MensRights13/07/12 09:23 PM
10

Another post on the coming extension of title IX to STEM
/r/MensRights13/07/12 09:10 PM
3

Read the post... he did
/r/MensRights11/07/12 06:02 PM
10

Dear feminist scum, what is wrong with men getting paid more? what is wrong with more men CEOs... why the president is fighting against it, but support the reverse situations. Feminism shamelessly acts to eliminate any male space and male institutions and celebrate the destruction of masculinity (e.g. the most direct version of this can be seen in the Bobbit case). Men must fight back.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 03:25 PM
11

Wow, just wow... the hypocrisy is amazing
/r/MensRights11/07/12 03:20 PM
4

I have two kids that I love deeply. I will give as much as I want and directly to them. I will not give another person control over my money and I will not respect any decision by family courts. Enough talking and talking it is time for men to truly rebel.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 01:30 AM
6

They will never stop... I commit to rot in prison than ever pay a single cent in alimony, forced child support or any other feminist invention. This is my resistance. I will stop working and live in the street (like my father after his divorce), but never give them a single cent.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 12:22 AM
1

In many ways, feminism is about identifying with your gender like a nationalist identify with his tribe... our rights, the number of our CEO compares to the ones who are not us... Maybe the sons are just like there mothers, only with regard to their own sex. BTW, I'm also a son of a feminist with burning hatred to anything feminist...
/r/MensRights25/06/12 04:50 PM
-2

lolozzlozzlz, gotta go, take care and don't kill yourself you little suicidal retard.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:56 PM
-2

Hang on, just hang on, it will be better http://www.reddit.com/r/SuicideWatchForRetards/
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:51 PM
-2

Stop crying! you're making me feel bad.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:42 PM
-2

I'm just joking around...
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:39 PM
0

You should understand that text (and especially short text) is problematic in giving "air of comic exaggeration." Regarding your attempt at being funny: keep your day job... " how should I distinguish?"... If I don't link to my blog how am I promoting my blog? This brings me back to my previous question regarding you being retarded. Did you ever had your IQ tested? maybe you are actually in fact retarded. I'm not trying to offend you, I'm actually completely serious. Get tested! if you get early…
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:28 PM
3

Yes, you should learn to understand what is "self-promoting" of blogs and what is simply posting to reddit. (this is regarding your original comment of "And for the tenth time in the last fourteen days... Is the traffic to your blog really so bad?")
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:20 PM
5

You are welcome to downvote if you think it is not interesting or a repost... meanwhile the post got more upvotes than downvotes so I guess some people find it relevant/interesting.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:13 PM
5

are you retarded or are you stupid-baiting? this is a link to salon...
/r/MensRights04/06/12 10:05 PM
1

Well, this was obvious from the beginning... I link it to show who we are dealing with.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 11:47 PM
-4

First, gender roles helped maintain societies for ages. Feminists are the enemy, nothing else. Never compromise.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 05:09 PM
1

I had the same plans (my own father went to prison, lost his shop and was homeless for a while after the divorce). But if you do this, you basically let feminists prevent you from having a family and let them control you life. It's like running away from a problem.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:04 PM
1

Yes it did. "sexual differentiation" thus is biological and not a social construct... i.e. Gender is not a social construct
/r/MensRights10/05/12 09:04 PM
2

These are complicated problems as it is, and they are also infected by politics and political correctness...
/r/MensRights08/05/12 05:18 PM
1

Read what I wrote please. I claim there is a difference in the way government and society view things when women are on top (no rights are violated...) and when men are on top (if men get more money than there is discrimination)
/r/MensRights08/05/12 04:13 PM
8

Difference in outcomes does not prove discrimination.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 04:08 PM
7

If women's lack of motivation to get into high paying jons is considered a problem by the government (e.g. http://www.aauw.org/stem/), so should men's lack of ambition be a "problem" Or you can just not try to engineer society at all. However, feminists like yourself claim discrimination and required AA when women have less and talk about merit and "so what" when women have more.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 11:05 PM
2

I hate both democrats and republicans, each for difference reasons. But this means I'm not voting for Obama.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 04:40 PM
3

http://dicipres.wordpress.com/2012/05/01/evidence-of-marriage-strike/
/r/MensRights01/05/12 05:13 PM
-1

Not everybody have to be nice all the time...
/r/MensRights25/04/12 09:48 PM
-1

Well, I deleted the part about "truth," since I thought it is too strong of a word to use here. The post simply states that forming a long-term bond with a short-term person can increase the risk that the relationship will fail. I just wrote that in the most offensive way possible, in order to get under as many people skins as possible and for fun...
/r/MensRights25/04/12 09:34 PM
-2

No.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:52 PM
1

The mother can decide how much money she invest in the children, she gets all the control. She can decide to get the child support and buy herself shoes. However, the man get no say, he must pay by law. If a man wants to give his children money, thats great. But he shouldn't be forced to do it by child support law when the wife is free to do as she please with her (and his) money. Women can be despicable and men can be despicable. But only men face the full weight of the law. Child support is a …
/r/MensRights25/04/12 06:10 PM
3

Child support is a feminist invention. If she can afford to raise the kids then she shouldn't divorced or let the father raise them. Child support make men into slaves.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 04:54 PM
-2

I will say whatever I want about yours or any other culture. You gave no argument, so I don't have actually anything to reply to. You just curse and write nonsensical BS. This is like arguing a retarded schizophrenic NOW member with a Tourette syndrome, after lobotomy. I can almost hear you pronouncing the "Do NOT tell ME what the fuck" out loud and it is hilarious.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 05:42 PM
1

see http://omnipitron.com/ a black MRM talking about problems feminism created in the black society. Accusations of racism should be well founded and not used to obtain leverage in discussion. Feminism empowered black women, without a similar initiative to empowering of black men, thus making black men unable to get the social status required to form strong bonds with their women (google hypergamy). Feminism supported sexual promiscuity, fought slut shaming and thus diminished the effect of sex …
/r/MensRights24/04/12 04:37 PM
1

It's like white power with the exception of being politically correct.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 08:59 AM
1

"in genetic" should be "is genetic"
/r/MensRights19/04/12 02:42 AM
8

I hope he already got tenure...
/r/MensRights19/04/12 12:09 AM
-3

Please don't link to manboobz, its lowers the IQ and hurts your eyes.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:55 PM
1

Thank you for a well written and in depth reply. I disagree with some of your arguments. First, "well- ovulating women report being attracted to men they perceive as sensitive and feminine" is not true see "Ovulating women favour dominant men's smell" http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050704/full/news050704-6.html as well as many other peer-reviewed articles. "I don't think eroding is quite the right word for what's happening to societal norms" did you read eat pray love or any other modern divorc…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 04:10 PM
1

I did not claim that people are consciously motivated by genetic interests, only that they act due to both inner genetic reasons (eg attraction triggers) and due to societal influence (social norms and laws). Since social norms are eroding people will act mainly based on inner genetic reasons (of which they are not consciously aware) Thanks for the correction of the typo.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 06:13 AM
1

Well, in any model you try to include the essential mechanisms so you can describe the most important processes clearly. In my opinion getting the best genes and raising the children are main motivations in mating and mate selection. What do you think is missing? What should I have added?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:57 PM
1

I don't like patriarchy 2.0, but I guess that "A rose by any other name ..." The vast majority of the work was is about humans.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 04:47 AM
0

Again, there are always exceptions, but the statistics claim the typical case is different.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 04:49 PM
0

There are always exceptions, but the statistics claim the typical case is different. BTW, I never heard a woman apologize and taking responsibility for breaking up a family and hurting her kids, somehow this is always blamed on the man, always excuses.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 04:48 PM
0

Well, defining patriarchy as the most horrible thing is one of feminism main tenets. Patriarchy literary means the father is the leader of the family. Since in the black communities women are the head of the households (72% of children are out of wedlock/most are raised without a father/etc.) and men pay them money without any say in the raising of their children, the term matriarchy is appropriate. Calling it patriarchy 2.0 is buckling to feminism. Regarding hyper-masculinity, this is a very in…
/r/MensRights14/04/12 04:38 PM
0

"where either party overpowers the other do not last long" well, while in the extreme cases you might be right, look at the following statistics From an article entitled THE EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY AND ECONOMICS OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR AND INFIDELITY by Donald Cox, Department of Economics Boston College: "cheating women are more likely than cheating men to have an affair with someone better educated than their current spouse." and from http://onlinedatingpost.com/archives/2010/02/sextistics-your-sex-sta…
/r/MensRights14/04/12 04:27 PM
1

Great idea actually.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 01:27 PM
-3

I agree that there always are exceptions, but from looking at the data your case is not typical. In most cases the children are better if the family stays intact. Also, as you said, you might be damaged in a similar way if your parents did divorce. I know it will offend you, but I'll say it anyway. I also think that men 'should' be the head of the household. Not because it is right or moral, but because I believe families work better this way. Feminism and women sexuality are in conflict since w…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 11:36 PM
1

That's an interesting example, since adopted children often seek their biological parent, even tough their have no connection to them beside the biological connection. Biology matters.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 07:10 PM
2

BTW, your wife doesn't need to even know.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 05:17 PM
1

All the upvotes. Finally a free man who is not afraid to offend.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:55 PM
3

" immature man child with a medieval mindset" These are not arguments, just name calling.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:54 PM
3

Yes it is. DNA is what makes a father. It is the basic definition of fatherhood. Uncle or other family members can act to guide a young person, that does not make them fathers. You think you are a moral person, but you are just weak and let society to manipulate you. I'm sure that you will get a pat on your back, a good little dog who roll other to please others. DNA makes a father, being a weak sucker makes a cuckold.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:52 PM
2

Preventing millions of men from being cuckolded is much more important than your excuses. People are tested every time they go in airports and definitely when getting born, before parental relations are established, a small noninvasive test can be made. You are nothing but another feminist wanting to be able to cuckold your spouse with immunity.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:47 PM
1

There is only one father, by adding another "father" you marginalize and undermine your real father.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:41 PM
1

I knew it will pisses you off. I'm sorry for that. But I am sick of the marginalization of fathers. "I will take them on as my own children" means you will act as a father. Fatherhood does not end when a man is kicked out of his house. The mother can decide to replace her husband but she cannot replace her children father at will. BTW, personally I have a "stepdad" which I hate and that thought he has jurisdiction over me just because he married my mother, so I do have some experience.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:42 AM
-3

The kids have father/s, you cannot just proclaim yourself a father and replace their real dad. You are just the guy doing their mom.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:45 PM
2

No good solution, all routes are extremely painful.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:43 PM
3

My condolences Sandy
/r/MensRights12/04/12 06:20 PM
7

Feminism is a bad name to a movement which both genders are supposed to support. It is sexist by definition.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 07:11 PM
2

I just cited statistics. If you have a better explanation I would be happy to hear your "basic comprehension of cultural issues."
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:35 PM
7

It is related to the risk men have to be exposed to a biased family courts. So it is related, although indirectly.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:33 PM
1

Who said anything about hating women? you sound like a feminist blaming every unconformable argument with accusations of misogyny. I said cause, not blame/fault. Since women initiate more divorce regardless of the gender of the person they are married to, it is logical to postulate that women cause more divorces.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:13 PM
1

"how does that statistical correlation apply to the individual" - well it don't. I didn't claimed "Sarah" is more probable to cause divorce compared with "John." I did claimed that statistical correlation exists which suggests that women initiate divorce more than twice compared to men, regardless of the gender of the person they married and thus it is reasonable to postulate that women cause more divorce than men (highly offensive, I know, but that does not make it untrue). BtW: The limitations…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:00 PM
2

I hope the government research was made by people smart enough to account for this, (but you can't be sure of that can you...)
/r/MensRights06/04/12 04:57 PM
1

This is, basically, my data: 1. Straight women file for divorce at twice the rate of straight men 2. Gay women file for divorce at twice the rate of gay men My conclusion is that women cause more divorce. Why is that not logical? If divorce was due to the horrible behavior of men, why gay women divorce more than gay men? And yes, I agree that other factors may be relevant, however, you never have all of the picture and we always base our conclusions on the evidence at hand. The conclusion may be…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:53 PM
7

Why do you think it is "misogynistic", we just cited statistics.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:51 PM
3

Again, I agree that children, income, wealth should be accounted for. But we don't have that data, so, as of now, we can only postulate based on the information available. If you find more data I'll be happy to reconsider my position.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:47 PM
10

From the government source I gave and you didn't bother to read "Civil partnership dissolutions by sex The number of dissolutions granted varies by sex. Of all dissolutions granted in England and Wales up to the end of 2010, 62 per cent have been to female couples despite only 44 per cent of formations being to female couples. The proportion of dissolutions to female couples differs by year. In 2007, 70 per cent of dissolutions granted were to female couples whereas in 2010 this was only 60 per …
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:11 PM
3

http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/population-trends-rd/population-trends/no--145--autumn-2011/ard-pt145-civil-partnerships.pdf
/r/MensRights05/04/12 10:19 PM
15

Women can kick the husband from the house at their whim and keep control of the children and most of his money. Go to hell troll.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 09:47 PM
6

This wasn't arguing. You didn't answer any of my points or presented new information. This was you blaming me of "Confirmation bias" and than said that discussion "can't be done." BTW, this is also written here to make it clear that not all MR members are afraid of offending others. BTW2, I'm not a traditionalist.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 08:26 PM
7

If you can find data that I ignored (due to my "Confirmation bias"), I'll be happy to take that into account as well. The only person ignoring data because it doesn't fit his view of the world is you.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 08:15 PM
10

ignatiusloyola man, You should join the politically correct thought police and make us all say nice things all the time so nobody will be ever offended. There are statistic correlations, gay men divorce less than gay women, straight women initiate divorce more than twice compared with straight men. These two statistic correlations make it is reasonable to postulate that women cause divorce more than men. Offensive, you bet, but it is a reasonable description of reality. http://dicipres.wordpress…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 08:05 PM
3

-550 karma will a mod please ban this troll
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:15 PM
1

Troll, get lost.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:08 PM
2

The fact that something is posted in MR can be used to say its untrustworthy since it is from the respective "Brady Campaign." If you think she is writing BS, that's fine. But it should be based on the article itself, not your personal opinion of the website reputation.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:07 PM
5

You're attacking the platform, not the message. Everything posted on MR in general can be written off by similar arguments.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 07:53 PM
3

OK, never watching American Dad again...
/r/MensRights02/04/12 07:50 PM
1

if "salaried jobs are usually performance based" and women are getting less, maybe they are doing less. Anyway, the statement "salaried jobs are usually performance based" is unfounded and you give no support to such ridiculous statement. Most jobs pay by the hour. You won, women are making more, why aren't you happy?
/r/MensRights26/03/12 01:30 AM
1

How is this upvoted?
/r/MensRights25/03/12 05:45 AM
0

Great post. I wonder who the hell is downvoting this.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 05:44 AM
2

social movements always claim to do "good." We should judge a social movement for its actions, not statements. If feminism was about equality it would have been called equalism. Feminism is the organization of one gender to attack the other. Edit: This is why I am not a "maninist."
/r/MensRights23/03/12 07:06 AM
3

Feminism is not about equal rights. Feminism is discrimination. http://dicipres.wordpress.com/2012/02/14/equal-not-indentical/
/r/MensRights23/03/12 06:45 AM
1

The point I am trying to make is that if men don't want to marry\LTR a promiscuous woman does not make them primitive bigots... men can choose what women they want and similarly, women can choose if they prefer a man with low or high number of sexual partners. Generally, it seems from the data that people with low numbers, of both genders, are preferable for long term relationship.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 06:43 AM
2

Well they married them, so I don't think it is the case (but go figure, statistics only give correlations, not reasons). BTW, I saw another study that found that for every additional sexual partner women are 4% less likely to report being satisfied in their marriage (and for men it was 5%). I will try to find the link... I am an anti-feminist, not a maninist. Equal rights to all, but no social engineering.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 06:37 AM
1

This is relevant http://www.hookingupsmart.com/2012/01/06/hookinguprealities/the-sexual-double-standard-cuts-both-ways/
/r/MensRights23/03/12 05:16 AM
2

This post is much more relevant than 50% of the posts in MR which are 'a bitch killed some dude/did something bad' posts. read my point below, while not totally MR, it has some intersection with MR.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 04:43 AM
2

This post is much more relevant than 50% of the posts in MR which are 'a bitch killed some dude/did something bad' posts. JustBeAManAboutIt is an excellent new blogger who seems very intelligent and sharp and he do talk about MR in his posts. The fact that he focuses on game does not makes him irrelevant. I know that there are allot of PUA/game idiots, but that shouldn't tarnish the entire group, just like the fact that MR has quite a few idiots shouldn't tarnish MR. BTW, you are by far the most…
/r/MensRights23/03/12 04:38 AM
-1

This is also related to MR since: feminists frown about men as primitive when they don't want to marry a woman with a high number of sexual partners. Well, as seen in the link above this primitive male intuition is reasonable (and also in http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x/abstract)
/r/MensRights23/03/12 12:14 AM
1

Keep posting married_woman_plus_k, thanks.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 11:56 PM
1

Calculated per hour, there is no significant gap. Also, the fact that different groups have different results does not prove discrimination.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 11:22 PM
3

ignatiusloyola, I do not seek your approval. There is a voting system to decide if this is relevant or not, and this is definitely not spam or white noise.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 11:19 PM
2

This link is a men's issue showing how feminism can be criticized from a game perspective. There are allot of interesting discussions in the Game sphere which are relevant to MR. I urge you to be sympathetic to game/PUA. Yes, you will be ridiculed due to this, but MR and Game are both expressions of male frustration.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 11:13 PM
10

Troll, get banned.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 10:02 PM
1

Great Idea
/r/MensRights21/03/12 06:58 PM
1

That's true, context can change this, one way or the other. But we don't really know what the context is in this case.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 04:31 PM
1

Deleted.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 09:14 PM
4

The father can save for college fund for the kid by himself. Child support today is a feminist tool used to reduce the power of men and transfer it to women. Every penny that is spend from child support should be documented.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:39 PM
2

Well, you don't really know for sure. That's evidence indicating wrongdoing, not proving but still justify to investigate it further.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:36 PM
1

We are outside of the politically correct box, and there are allot of "bad" people outside this box. http://dicipres.wordpress.com/2012/02/29/outside-of-the-politically-correct-box/
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:51 PM
1

Who will decide what is lie and what is truth? who will watch the watchmen?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:18 AM
2

You absolutely right. She is now added.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:16 AM
0

Why is this getting downvoted?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:04 AM
3

First, the reason the want him down is the slut. Secondly, people have different view of truth/lies. Maybe he actually believes what he says. Who will decide what is truth? people have different ideas of truth and nobody should be forced to shut up. Feminists like you are the biggest hypocrites on earth. I think you spread lies, maybe the government should take away your internet access?
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:51 AM
3

Paul Elam, John the Other, Glenn Sacks, Darlock, W.F. Price, Ferdinand Bardamu, as well as Roosh and Roissy (although both from a game perspective). Edit: see my post http://dicipres.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/tell-everybody/ and the comments for more
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:37 AM
2

BTW 1, what do you think about quotes for women CEOs? or every other feminist initiative? BTW 2, I read somewhere that poor boys are failing significantly more than poor girls, but rich boys do just as well as rich girls. I will try to find the source and link it...
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:54 AM
3

At my university (and at every other top 10 university) women get preferential treatment which forces 50% representation. Half of the women in the top STEM universities are there due to affirmative action. You don't want affirmative action? great (I agree with you) cancel all the affirmative action programs. You agree with affirmative action? than give it to everybody.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:29 AM
1

Great Work Jeremiah, keep posting man.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter