TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

drok007 Archive

View 52 posts and 8,788 comments by drok007 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
64

Discussiondrok007/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 06:36 PM
62

CMVdrok007/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 05:12 PM
43

Red Pill Theorydrok007/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 06:41 PM
25

Debatedrok007/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 10:29 PM
23

Red Pill Theorydrok007/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 07:35 AM
21

Question for RedPilldrok007/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 04:32 PM
20

Debatedrok007/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 12:10 PM
16

drok007/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:14 PM
13

Discussiondrok007/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 03:21 PM
13

Debatedrok007/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 06:12 AM
12

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/14 08:51 AM
10

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/14 04:07 AM
10

Question for BluePilldrok007/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 04:15 PM
9

Discussiondrok007/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 03:15 AM
9

Question for Womendrok007/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 01:43 AM
9

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/14 11:50 AM
9

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/14 01:43 AM
9

Discussiondrok007/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/14 09:05 PM
7

CMVdrok007/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 04:22 PM
7

Question for BluePilldrok007/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/15 02:56 AM
7

Debatedrok007/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 02:52 AM
7

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/14 12:14 AM
7

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/14 12:07 AM
7

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/14 04:09 PM
7

Discussiondrok007/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 06:29 PM
6

Debatedrok007/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/17 03:12 PM
6

CMVdrok007/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 11:11 PM
6

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/14 05:17 AM
6

Question For Bluepilldrok007/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 09:01 PM
6

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/14 05:44 PM
5

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/14 03:11 AM
5

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/14 06:12 AM
5

Discussiondrok007/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/16 06:08 PM
4

Question for BluePilldrok007/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/16 11:20 PM
4

Discussiondrok007/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 01:14 AM
4

Discussiondrok007/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 03:59 PM
4

Debatedrok007/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/14 12:47 AM
4

Discussiondrok007/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/14 03:38 AM
3

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/16 02:05 AM
3

Question for BluePilldrok007/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/16 10:54 PM
3

Debatedrok007/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/16 04:44 PM
3

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 06:30 AM
2

Debatedrok007/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/14 05:12 PM
2

Discussiondrok007/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 03:16 AM
2

Question for Purgersdrok007/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:21 AM
2

Discussiondrok007/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/14 03:28 AM
2

Discussiondrok007/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 01:02 AM
1

Q4Alldrok007/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/15 05:35 AM
1

Question for BluePilldrok007/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/16 07:16 PM
1

drok007/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 03:39 PM
0

CMVdrok007/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:25 PM
0

Discussiondrok007/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 11:12 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 8,788 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think it doesn’t allow people to experience the qualities in a partner they need to right off the bat that allows the best connections to form. People’s presence matters a lot more than just the pics and text. I think you mentioned somewhere that the pictures with friends are performative, and I agree, but all the pictures are performative, not just with friends, because the whole thing is a flawed method.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/26 02:59 AM
1

Your second paragraph in the OP seemed to imply that they cannot do those things in any meaningful capacity. However, it would still be viewed as a red flag if they do not have friends that they do any of their hobbies with. Friend groups are social proof that you are a human worth dealing with, that other people can deal with, and really, it should be how you meet people, as it becomes self-selecting for your tribe, class, and values. I know everyone is on the online dating stupidity now, but t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/26 02:40 AM
2

It sounds like you feel like it is not red flag, and you would like it to be your preference. But it is generally a red flag, and not a good thing for most people. Anti-social behavior is considered a disorder in humans, as being social has and does help the advancement of humanity. Assuming it wasn’t an indication of a bad thing, it still winds up being an actual bad thing most of the time. Most partners don’t want the pressure every social interaction being conducted through them, and it will …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/26 02:24 AM
3

There is nothing more blue pill than listening to women speak their nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 06:47 PM
-1

Yeah because they are all gay and gay people have a lot of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 04:31 PM
2

Red pill has always been correct, this would be a good personality. It’s the looks part that’s more irrelevant. The guy himself doesn’t have all those gay black piller model traits they say are necessary. If he didn’t kill a CEO, he would just be an in shape guy no one would give a second thought about.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:10 PM
1

It’s likely a good personality, you are just incorrect like you are about looks, because of blue pill morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:03 PM
-1

It’s usually black pillers/incels come off as insane people who can’t get laid simply because they are wrong. While looks can matter, in the case of incels, looks do not matter, it’s just their scapegoat to cope and be incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 12:02 PM
1

I mean it is disagreement, it’s just shallow and often nonsense. Looks, game, personality is all irrelevant when it comes to what the pills are as ideologies. It’s the simple “I’m struggling” take, not the academic take about what it means philosophically. But if you go down that path, you will never get the understanding of why the pills are what they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 10:52 PM
-1

Debate threads require people to disagree with you, however, their understanding is reductive and shallow as evidenced. I’ve been here for 10 years, I could have a Ph.D. In this nonsense by now. I’ll add further, that blue/black pill is more of a religion/ideology, so naturally they will be defensive of it. They view their beliefs as truth, not just what they prefer. It’s the same way a theistic person would feel if you start talking about God as a concept you use in a belief system as opposed t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 02:02 PM
1

I did a long post on it here: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/c0gK219yps
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 01:49 PM
1

Women: No Some Yes Yes Yes No Men: Yes Yes, when young No I don’t believe this exists generally speaking, so I guess no. Yes Yes I’m not a black pill dipshit who is wrong about women, looks, and reality. I am also not blue pill who is wrong about women, morality, and reality. Black pill and blue pill are the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 01:35 PM
–

Talking looksmatch which is just collectivist looks morality, the way they talk about how women go for chad. it’s like when red pill talked about tingles, but that related more to behavior. now it’s just strictly looks of male models which are largely homosexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 12:09 AM
1

You can bury your head in the sand all you want, looks will never be true
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 08:45 PM
1

Cause looks don’t matter
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 08:44 PM
1

Black pill refutation actually, looks don’t matter. You just want them to with your black pill looks morality, even though they don’t matter in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 08:44 PM
–

They don’t claim it directly, they claim it with their beliefs from their ideology. Like the focus on looks, the way black pill men describe women’s attraction, is as if the women were men. Its not as if they say “women have male sexuality”, they just talk about women as if they did have male sexuality. And I agree with you that there is a lot of information that is needed to describe the pills, however, you still choose the more irrelevant ones to describe them. The biggest ones would be blue/b…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 04:09 PM
–

Black pill believes women have spontaneous male sexuality. the way they talk about women liking male looks is the way a man describes a woman, not the way women describe men, men and women are different. Black pillers tend to prove that looks don’t matter everyday, at least the way black pillers think they do. As much as black pillers say women prove black pill by existing. Black pillers prove black pill is incorrect by existing as well. You need to look into and learn what concepts define ideol…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 03:16 PM
-1

Black pill essentially is blue pill epistemologically and it entirely in common blue pill. There are just minor things that change. Black pill has looks collectivism vs blue pills altruistic collectivism. So it’s just more non-red pill nonsense, looks don’t actually matter like black pill thinks they do, looks are just black pills morality. Also black and pill both top from the bottom, where the ugliest/most oppressed is the most moral/enlightened. They both ignore catallaxy and heuristics, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 01:30 PM
5

Sometimes they do, I didn’t say all, I said it was an example. Do you need an autistic clarification of it? My stance: the number of misogynist incels who want women in cages is somewhere significantly greater in percentage than the average male population who want women in cages but less than or equal to 99.999%.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 06:05 PM
3

I mean you can make all sorts of conclusions about it. Anyone who has talked to incels or read what incels have said believes it. Just because a few incels want to play the anti-epistemological game of “how can you truly know anything at all?” doesn’t mean it isn’t true and that anyone who isn’t an incel already believes it. Hell even many incels freely acknowledge they are misogynists and incels are misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 05:30 PM
2

Significantly higher than the average male population for sure. However, many more believe stuff that is less extreme while still sufficiently misogynist and in the same vein. Much of it is by compilation as well as they may not outright say it. It seems weird to challenge this exceedingly obvious trend, even though I have used a facetious example that is still easy enough to find examples of.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 05:06 PM
4

Then why do they say they do?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 04:42 PM
4

I don’t really agree with the character of the people at IT, but they’ve done a good job of cataloging black pillers saying stupid shit like that, here is an example since you seem to need it: https://np.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/s/fCXSBAtK9B Even the ones that don’t outright say it have sentiments that are similar. Some may not have put it together that they would need it to fit their desires for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 04:42 PM
9

Well, I guess they don’t all believe that but it’s not an uncommon sentiment especially when compiling all their beliefs together.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 03:27 PM
11

I would say it’s possible. The black pillers and incels here seem to hate women for anything they do, like when they partner with good Chadly men they hate them for having standards, and when they partner with weak pathetic men, they hate them for taking advantage of those men. They seem to want to just put women in the breeding cages regardless, and not let them have any control over their own lives. They seem to hate to see women having fun. I would say this is misogyny as they hate them for e…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 01:55 PM
2

Yeah, you basically get through 36.8% of your window and take the next thing that’s as good as what you’ve had previously.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 11:11 PM
1

Besides finishing up most milestones regarding education and getting into career, I think many people subconsciously use the 1/e strategy in finding a mate. It seems like it’s around the appropriate window for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 06:39 PM
6

What you describe is RP, the issue is that influencers who reach a wide audience and are considered “red pill” are not necessarily RP. Additionally, most of the “red pillers” here are actually black pill. Black pill is a form of blue pill, as they were blue pillers who choked on the red pill, spat it back up, and remained blue pill with even stupider beliefs replacing altruism for looks, and men being defective women to women being defective men. So it depends on how you define concepts, through…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 10:48 AM
1

Sorry to disappoint but no.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 01:14 PM
4

Because women are the regard gender, you shouldn’t be listening to them. You will only hear stupid shit. They are pretty to look at, but maddening to listen to, so you just don’t do it. Ignore their wants, complaints, invalidate their feelings, don’t take them seriously, whatever you have to. In addition, you should be ignoring every other moron who is paying attention to them too. Maybe, maybe, maybe if a woman proves herself worthy, you can indulge her occasionally, like if you are married to …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 05:16 PM
2

Because rage porn gets engagement and therefore money. I don’t see any of the nonsense black pillers show unless I go search it out in online spaces. Women have been saying stupid shit for millennia, no reason to start believing them now.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 05:06 PM
6

Black pill is peddling bullshit from specific women being curated by algorithms that are trolling the men addicted to their rage porn. Number #1 rule of red pill is not to listen to women, black pill is just blue pill nonsense that forgot that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 04:58 PM
4

My wife is a SAHM, but this pros and cons list if I can even assume that’s what it is is odd. Many of the items don’t make sense or are wrong. It can be difficult if you don’t like the lifestyle, if you finding homemaking and child rearing awful then yeah, you could say it’s hard for you. But actually doing things laundry and dishwashing is not difficult with washing machines and dishwashers it’s at best tedious and mundane. Child rearing is probably the actual hard one on there potentially, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 02:14 PM
1

Men who want to be chosen for their looks exclusively are just men who want to be women. It’s cryptotranny ideation. Most men do not feel this way, it’s just weird black pillers online jealous of women. They aren’t taken seriously by normal people.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:02 PM
1

That’s not what reactionary means, that would be the definition of spontaneous. And it just doesn’t really happen for women. The looks don’t really matter, most people are average anyway, and get laid with the same amount of ease unless they learn game. Needing to do it through looks is just a morality, but not reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 03:05 PM
1

No, men and women have opposite sexuality, they are opposite sexes. Women have reactive sexuality while men’s is spontaneous. Things would be a lot different if this weren’t the case. Only men and rare exceptions are spontaneously visually stimulated, if you believe otherwise, it is just a morality that is detached from reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 01:03 PM
1

No it’s an exception of situations. Regardless of what women do, although I suspect even within the same woman there is variance, as it’s more about tingles and her mood. Women do not have male sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 12:39 PM
1

This is the exception to the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 12:11 PM
1

I don’t know, an average amount of effort? We threw parties, girls would show up. Men rate women more highly in looks because men care about looks, women don’t. So they just rate most men low because it’s not something they care about.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 01:22 AM
1

I have never known ugly guys to have issues in my social circles, people got laid or had girlfriends all the time. Some girls were hooked for a bit, some moved on. Most of the women were more attractive than me, some crazy hot, mostly average, a few were meh and a few fatties but any port in a storm. The whole looks nonsense thing that black pill espouses seems to be the exception to the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 10:09 PM
1

They do pick men who are masculine. Looks don’t really matter. It’s blue pill to believe men and women are the same. I don’t have ignore anything, I lived in reality and got laid a bunch as an ugly man. It’s just not something women really care about.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 12:43 PM
1

Because black pill is your religion, and looks are your morality. Looks matter to you, it is blue pill in the same way blue pill is about altruism which many people also do not care about. In reality looks don’t matter that much, they have an effect but it’s not that big of a deal. At least for women judging men, looks do matter for women to be successful in dating. But men and women are different and do not have the same sexuality, unless you are further blue pilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 12:25 PM
1

Yeah, then if all black pillers are banned looks could maybe be discussed meaningfully. Until then black pillers are here being wrong about looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 11:57 AM
6

It was a response to The New Religion that was Atheism+ and the rest of the proto-wokeness that split from atheism in the late 00s and early 10s. RP was a continuation of the nihilism of atheism separated from the religiousity of atheism+ and other places like SRS and the rest of the fempire combined with PUA aspects from things like The Game written by Neil Strauss. I mean the blue pill subreddit itself was similar to an offshoot of the fempire, which was really an extension of SA goons. Additi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 08:27 PM
2

Yeah if the energy discussed was always chakras and crystals and other dumb bullshit. Maybe this sub should actually just ban all black pillers, red and blue pill didn’t need to discuss looks for over a decade until the moron brigade arrived.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 11:05 PM
2

This just proves looks don’t matter, all those men get laid and get relationships anyway. Black pill is some stupid shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 12:22 PM
1

It’s still their morality, it has nothing to do with wants, even most religions morality does not line up with wants, it’s usually at odds to control things. The issue with black pillers is that it simply leads to nonsense. The looks innate attraction trigger isn’t a meaningful thing, at best it’s an exception to the rule, similar to how blue pill operates with their beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 03:22 PM
1

I don’t think extremism matters, anything can be extreme. Black pill does not focus on nature, it is male solipsism similar to how blue pill comes from female solipsism. They may try and dress it up is whatever language to help them cope, but it still tends to be a morality first belief system. It’s why they are so mad and confused at women, because they want looks to be the end all be all, like it often is for men’s preferences and their spontaneous sexuality and when it isn’t for women and the…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 03:14 PM
0

It’s not even that physical appearance trumps everything in reality, it’s that looks and looks collectivism are part of black pill morality, which is why it’s such a focus. This is a parallel to blue pill altruistic collectivism. Only red pill tends to follow egoist individualism.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 03:02 PM
1

I’ve been saying it for over a decade and it’s always wound up being correct. I should have a Ph.D. In pillology by this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:52 PM
1

It’s just shallow nonsense divorced from ideological categorization. And red pill is an ideology. If you want to adhere to a thoughtless definition you will be wrong about it and your OP will continue to fall short due to a lack of understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:51 PM
0

this post describes how blue and black pill are epistemologically similar. I don’t believe in the shallow descriptions people use. Ideologically black pill is similar to blue pill, because it’s just the same people who returned to that style of thinking. It’s why the covert narcissism matches for blue and black as well more so than red pill. Red pill is much more concerned with understanding the catallaxy of sexual dynamics and fitting into that, enjoying the decline as it were, understanding th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:48 PM
3

Then they aren’t red pill, they are black pill. Black pillers choked on the red pill, spat it up, and remained blue pill but gross and covered in vomit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:27 PM
3

Blue pill and black pill do, but not black pill and red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:25 PM
4

These traits all sound like things exhibited by black pill not red pill. Except maybe condescending and superior as well as denying and dismissing others feelings, those are fairly red pill. Black pill is a form of blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 02:17 PM
2

Yes, that’s what the red pill is about. The black/blue pillers (they are the same thing) here are morons.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 04:52 PM
1

It’s not axiomatic, that’s not what it means, it’s probably not even common among most. There may be a common definition among feminists, but it doesn’t categorically define feminism without it, as an incorrect concept of equality wouldn’t be feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 12:29 AM
1

It’s axiomatic. Evidence is for things like “is turning off a good way to overcome LMR being used for plausible deniability?”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:52 PM
1

Evidence couldn’t play into it. If red pillers choose to view woman as defective men, they wouldn’t be red pill. It would just be blue pillers claiming to be red pill and spouting blue pill. Black pill being primarily concerned with looks makes sense, looks ARE their morality, regardless of how much it matters to normal people.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 11:17 PM
1

Red pill is egoist individualism as opposed to blue pill’s altruist collectivism (and black pill’s lookist collectivism, black pill is blue pill). And red pill is also the assumption that the sexes are sexually different, blue pill tends to treat men like defective women with a more fundamental belief that they are the same, and black pill treats women like defective men with a fundamental belief that they are the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 09:44 PM
1

It does. You gave a definition, but it wasn’t really categorical. There is a certain shallowness to concepts many people use that don’t really get to the critical thought of the ideology. What is equality to a feminist, and why is that equality? That will define feminism categorically.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 09:30 PM
1

I mean it’s a concise way to present it yes, but conceptually there is a lot more implicit womanism to it. What equality means and how it’s achieved or how you know it’s achieved becomes defined by feminism itself as an ideology. The rationale for that is even more fundamental.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 09:14 PM
1

The first bullet is not correct, the pills are defined by their objective conceptual and categorical definitions of it, it should be neither the stated mission nor people’s experience with it. The other stuff is a sad display of men returning to blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 12:32 PM
–

I believe that was women working in tandem with conservatives to accomplish that. COCW
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:24 PM
0

No, across the sex. The sexes are different. It’s the conceptual definition. This is how you categorize blue pill and red pill. You don’t need an example, if you make HNU claims you are being blue pill, if you do the opposite you are red pill. It’s axiomatic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 01:24 PM
0

Blue pill is an enforcement of collectivist altruism and belief in human neurological uniformity through sexual sameness. This is the opposite of the red pill which believes in egoist individualism and a default to the sexes being different.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 12:57 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/4eSbKm4PQ8 this is the first one where I looked at it, but I believe they are all similar. Edit: here was another political compass https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/EZPMizquY8 Many surveys have been done throughout the years.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 06:30 PM
0

Red pill defines what red pill is, and that is anti-collectivist and assumption of sexual dissimilarity. If you are not this, you are blue pill. Black pill is included in that. Because of what red pill is, blue pill winds up being a more narrow ideological framework. This is seen in the surveys. Black pill can best be described as blue pillers who choked on the red pill, spat it up and remained blue pill because of cognitive affinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 06:24 PM
-2

They both use a collectivist moral framework, where blue pills is altruistic and black pills is lookist. This often has them both topping from the bottom regarding enlightenment status. With blue pillers it being the most oppressed and with black pill it being the ugliest and most incel. They both also treat their issues as societal problems because of this. Further, they both tend to favor studies over catallaxy and heuristics epistemologically. It leads them both to a belief of sexual sameness…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 04:41 PM
-2

Same as in my above comment, black pill is blue pill, it’s the same epistemology.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 03:54 PM
-7

Black pill is blue pill. It’s the same epistemology.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 03:53 PM
–

No that’s black pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 01:41 AM
0

There hasn’t been anything red pill on this sub for the past few years probably. It’s all just black pill now. Most of black pillers questions and confusion are answered by the red pill, but they are too busy being blue pill to care.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 05:27 PM
1

Except many of the women claim he was in their DMs complaining that he was in some kind of dead bedroom with his gf/fiancé no matter how much blue pill lovey-dovey nonsense he tried. I don’t know if I would take that as the pinnacle of successful autistic partnering.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 12:45 PM
1

Looks matter for women and gay men, not straight men. If you believe they do, it is one of the main issues why you can’t get a woman. People who believe they do and encourage others to think so are part of a cultural psyop to destroy relations and are either extremely naive or active enemy agents.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 02:50 PM
0

Don’t need to read their reddit history to know they are neurotic, annoying, and lame. Looks don’t matter for most of the cases. Believing looks matter in the way they say is more detrimental than the looks themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 01:54 PM
-1

I don’t think the issue is that “looks matter, but not as much as you say”. It’s that you are clearly talking to a deranged person, and it is very apparent from their personality and attitude that that is why they fail. It would be more apt to say “looks are not your issue, and do not apply in the case you are presenting.” Most people are average in looks (including the people bleating about looks all the time) and do fine, clearly crazy people do not do fine. At least this type of crazy is not …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 10:34 PM
0

Not for the lowest dregs who lack understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 10:18 PM
2

If someone thinks that it’s being communicated ineffectively in those cases, then all their issues are on them. The majority of people understand how it works, it’s on the underperforming to bridge the gap, not bringing everything and everyone down to the lowest common denominator.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 10:17 PM
7

I think this is likely, but if you are trying to look at it objectively from a perspective of “social harm”, I think they both fall in this category. And even if women like social media more, men still use it a lot, much more than women use porn. So I think social media would have a worse and larger effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 02:44 PM
12

Yeah social media is pretty terrible. I am pretty much the same way, I don’t care for it. But the people who do wrap themselves up in its bullshit. The only way I’ve seen it used that seems positive is to stay connected to family. You see a lot of talk about people being anti-porn, but anyone who is anti-porn, should be even more anti-social media than they are anti-porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 01:39 PM
6

It’s not a guarantee, it’s to not be as much of a loser. There are a lot of guys with friends who don’t have women, that’s not the point. There is a stronger correlation between the guys who don’t have friends not having women though. The sentiment often comes with the fact that those men who don’t want friends and just want a woman are doing it to get a sex hole + emotional tampon. This is not attractive to women and they can sense it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/24 01:31 PM
1

I imagine a blue piller would say black pill makes sense, because they have similar epistemology.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 03:06 AM
1

No they are confused, otherwise what they say would make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 03:04 AM
1

No, they believe they are the same spontaneous sexuality and are confused why don’t fuck the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 03:03 AM
1

Irrelevant detail, they both still think the sexes are the same and are confused by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:52 AM
1

No, black pill believes the blue pill lies, and red pill doesn’t believe society is against them that’s why they enjoy the decline, only black and blue pill believe that society is against them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:48 AM
1

They don’t, they believe opposite things.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:44 AM
1

No the blue pill and black pill confusion over reality that red pill lacks. It’s not an oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:37 AM
1

Yes, but other people’s confusion doesn’t mean they are oppressing them, that’s just a blue and black pill belief.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:14 AM
1

This is not what red pill believes, just black and blue pill on various things.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 01:55 AM
1

No, that’s black and blue thinking society is against them for various things. Red pill believes in catallaxy. It’s like you are trying to argue fascism and communism aren’t both oppressive regimes to a classical liberal. Blue pill and black pill are fascism and communism, two sides of an authoritarian coin and enemies of each other ironically enough, probably why black and blue pill have some internal disputes, red pill is different and just cares about liberty and individualism.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 01:41 AM
1

Most people are wrong, regardless. Most people can’t do calculus either, it doesn’t make them correct about higher math because they can’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 01:00 AM
1

Simple people, not correct people who are educated on epistemology.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 12:57 AM
2

Well, it’s your problem, I don’t care because I’m not lumped in with them, it’s proven to be epistemologically incorrect. My views on women don’t matter that much, there are plenty of blue pill women that have become my friends, and even agree with me now. I’ve watched this evolve for over a decade, I don’t think you have the skill set to correctly categorize it. You use very meaningless shallow understandings of the ideologies. I imagine that contributes to your confusion about it in general. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 12:51 AM
1

Not my problem, I am red pill. Even blue pillers now care about black pill loneliness.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 12:28 AM
1

Freedom of sex is just an internal blue pill struggle. That’s something for you collectivists to figure out. Red pill does not care about collectivism, and leaves success up to the individual in all aspects. Black pill is collectivist and so is blue pill, that’s why they are the same, red is not and is the opposite. Individualism is why the red pill is the red pill. Blue pill is a just a battery in the machine, red pill wakes up and does their own thing in light of the truth. Both blue pill and …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 12:24 AM
1

Blue pillers believe society is unfair and oppressive to many, black pill is similar in this regard because it is blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 11:51 PM
1

Those are details, they don’t matter, it’s still collectivism. Collectivism is mainstream, so it’s still mainstream thinking. The epistemological categorization is what matters for ideology, and these are ideologies. Plastic surgery matters about as much as the red pill view on baked beans.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 11:29 PM
1

Doesn’t matter, it uses mainstream thinking to further its cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 11:20 PM
1

Yes, well black pill is and black pill is blue pill. Collectivism is mainstream.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 11:17 PM
1

Blue pill isn’t necessarily communist, but they are certainly more likely to be, or closer to it and more sympathetic to it than red pill. Every survey has shown this to be try. Black pill really just advocates for sexual socialism because they are also blue pill. Red pill does neither. There are no gymnastics here, it’s simple epistemological categorization, which I am not sure you are capable of. This isn’t exclusive to you however, many blue red and black pill are wrong. I think the biggest t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 11:01 PM
1

It’s blue pill because it’s looks collectivist, red pill isn’t collectivist. They are confused about reality given that they think women are men, much the same way the rest of blue pill is confused about reality because they think men are women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 10:47 PM
1

Looks are blue pill/black pill only because they are the same thing, red pill doesn’t really care. Blue and black both care about morality as well, since they are both concerned with nice guys, red pill is not. Red pill does agree with being social, blue pill and black pill are both pro-introvert and more similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 09:49 PM
1

No, lol. Red pill does not believe looks like that matter. Red pill says to lift to be masculine and be able to be strong. Turning it into looks was blue pill/black pill nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 01:08 PM
1

Misogyny isn’t mainstream. Blue pill and black pill have closer views on looks than red pill does. Red pill would say looks that can’t be helped aren’t even worth discussing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 05:56 PM
1

Ugly people do date, but looks for women definitely have a lot more value culturally. This is mainstream, nearly everyone believes this, blue pill is actually in the minority in this. Sexism doesn’t have to be incentivized or condoned for it to be common, it’s that good.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 04:52 PM
1

Absolutist isn’t relevant. Sexism is pretty mainstream though, it’s why feminists are all assmad. Misogyny less so, but it’s not entirely gone, and it’s been on the rise now anyway. That’s why they are mad about the kids all following people like Andrew Tate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 04:24 PM
11

That’s not how market’s work, you improve until you get what you want. If you aren’t getting what you want then you aren’t good enough. Anyway, most guys out there are doing fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 01:48 AM
1

I’m not, aspects of pink pill are mainstream though, just like aspects of red pill are popular.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 01:38 AM
1

No, I’ve been seeing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 01:31 AM
1

I’ve always seen it
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 01:14 AM
1

To everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 12:21 AM
1

They are
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 11:29 PM
1

Because they have all the pro-feminine values: anti-aggression and violence, safetyism, anti-sex work, anti-porn, anti-hierarchy. They still believe in sex differences though, so there is that, but they are pro-feminine about it. There is actually a fundamental collectivism about it in the pro-feminine sense, but it’s not brainless like blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 11:05 PM
1

It’s not nessecarily pro-woman, it’s pro-feminine in values. That’s why it ties in with radfem.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 10:58 PM
1

That’s because men value looks and men aren’t women. So it pairs with red pill. Being feminine has nothing to with it, they still have to be pro-feminine.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 10:31 PM
1

It’s fact that they are pro-feminine, that’s what defines pink pill. I never said the latter, you made that up in your head like a lot of the beliefs about what the pills are apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 10:24 PM
1

They do, they are pro-feminine values in society. Just like red pill is pro-masculine. FDS doesn’t really matter. Pink pill would actually be more like red pill. Black pill is still blue pill though, you haven’t shown otherwise yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 10:22 PM
1

I would say it’s closer to OG radfem pink pill, not FDS, I don’t know what vindicta is
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 09:13 PM
5

Blue pill is for a small subset of demographics (wealthier and whiter) that do not value things like masculinity, red pill is for everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 12:52 PM
1

And blue pill
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 03:59 AM
1

It is, it’s usually just that blue pill women who are bitter call themselves blue pill. And blue pill men who are bitter call themselves black pill. Red pill is just people who aren’t bitter and are comfortable with the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 12:18 AM
1

Red pillers more just enjoy the decline, only black/blue need relationships. But both black and blue pill get bitter about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 09:07 PM
1

Not so much, it’s more a blue pill thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 09:00 PM
1

Yet black pillers often say they just want a relationship because they are blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 08:43 PM
1

No, only black pill and blue pill is bitter and resentful. Red pill is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 08:25 PM
1

Only to blue pillers, not to red pill. To red pill it is just nice and the good way forward. Black pill doesn’t like the red pill either and finds it anger inducing, because black pill is blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 08:19 PM
1

Yeah duh, anger phase is blue pill lol. Stage 5 of Kubler-Ross is acceptance. That is red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 08:15 PM
1

No, red pillers aren’t resentful of it. They just adopt a new successful sexual strategy. That’s why red pill says “enjoy the decline”, as in don’t worry about being nice. The ones who are resentful are just the black pill LARPing as red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 07:58 PM
1

They don’t have to say it, they would probably deny it even. But it’s pretty clear that’s what they think because they don’t understand women, and impart the male psyche onto them as it’s the only framework they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 07:55 PM
1

Misogyny and misandry are the same because they are both collectivist. Black pillers believe women are men, that’s why they are frustrated and confused by the fact that the amount of sex isn’t equal. It’s all just more of the same kinds of collectivist thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 07:49 PM
4

I’m not sure you know what the cognate is, or perhaps what a cognate is? Because everything you said is entirely irrelevant to my point about what would correspond to an apt cognate. In fact, I agree with everything you said after your inane first two sentences. It supports my argument even more lol. So thanks I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 02:29 PM
3

Poor analogy without an apt cognate, laying down in traffic has a pretty apparent reason why you don’t do it and will be explicitly stated. Women coming from their collectivist groupthink don’t really have rationale, it’s just what they and their friends thought. Often times because they wanted to fit in and didn’t care enough to challenge it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:27 PM
0

She was probably less independent when she was trying to blend in with collectivist groupthink.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:23 PM
1

Black pill female nature is fundamentally the same as blue pill. In that they think women are the same as men. Red pill and black pill both believe society is misandrist but for different reasons, black pill believes it is misandrist in the same way blue pill believes it’s misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 12:36 PM
2

There were parts of red pill that don’t focus on improvement, it doesn’t have to be self help. Technically black pill should fit there, but it’s still banned because it’s incorrect and blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 02:16 AM
1

Yeah, but they still aren’t what you say. Last I heard red pill had banned black pill discussion, probably because it’s blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 02:13 AM
7

I imagine there is alcohol in them in that video lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 09:44 PM
34

Some are probably racist and don’t like to see white girls dancing to that kind of music, some are probably bitter, jealous and have no idea what Greek life is like. It’s pretty hard to defend seeing some girls dancing together as an issue. If anything is an issue is that’s that they all have those Stanley cups which is unnecessary because Yeti already exists and is superior. The Stanley Cup is for hockey champions only.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 07:25 PM
6

I don’t think it’s predicated on spending money on them, I have had plenty of women buy things for me and pay for me. I would not be friends with a woman who I just had to bankroll.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 02:10 PM
5

Yes, the warm approach definitely works best. Cold approaching does require you to leave your comfort zone, and this actually a very important thing to do for yourself and attempt sometimes. Not just in dating but in life, expanding your comfort zone by constantly leaving it. That’s the difference between Chad and the shy loser, Chad makes other people’s personal space his comfort zone lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 02:07 PM
3

I’ve had plenty do this, but you have to set expectations. Female friendships are different than male friendships, blue pillers who say otherwise are trippin. Also, having them tell their friends to date you is weird way to phrase it, it’s more like you get an introduction and set you up with a chance and often times it is an easy layup, you make it sound like a mandate. The most common way this happens I would say is if it’s a girl who your friend is dating or hooking up with. They will bring t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 02:02 PM
35

The “traditional” way would be having friends or acquaintances and being introduced. This would probably bring the best success. However, in person and random is still better than online because online all you get are pictures which mean nothing. In person you get a sense of a persons vibe and charisma.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 11:59 AM
2

I am degenerate so the women in my life don’t have to be. 😌
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 12:35 AM
1

That’s just one persons view, trying to keep the grift going. Again Fe LCD.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 08:49 AM
1

That’s Fe LCD analysis, not how ideologies are categorized. It’s also not how red pill and blue pill are defined, so you don’t know what they mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 08:15 AM
1

PUA is neither blue pill nor red pill. It is not an ideology. It can be applied to blue or red pill. Red pill is not simply about getting laid, if you believe that, then you don’t understand red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 12:16 AM
1

No, getting sex would be PUA. RP is an ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 09:53 PM
1

It’s about a successful sexual strategy, of which getting sex is a part. Sexual strategy is a strategy of the sex i.e. male. The world isn’t hostile because female nature, it is hostile because of the current state of civilization, which is in part influenced matriarchal values and feminine ideology. The things that remain consistent and can be leveraged are female nature, of which various red pill techniques will provide success. Not in these words, much of this is populist opinion, it is not m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 07:37 PM
1

That is not what you said it was though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 06:25 PM
1

It wasn’t. I guess you are admitting you don’t know what red pill is, therefore you don’t know what blue pill is, which explains why you can’t understand that black pill is blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:56 PM
1

That’s not what you said, nor is it correct without context, try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:41 PM
–

Red pill men on this sub go back to blue pill all the time, that’s what black pill is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:24 PM
–

It means I don’t need to have a duty to all Women to be a good person TM. I guess I don’t really care if I am or not. I’m good to the women in my life and that’s what counts. The rest don’t matter, since they don’t matter they can do porn or work at strip clubs or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 01:06 AM
–

I would say it’s unethical not to do that, I’m not a collectivist. My Dunbar’s number certainly does not include all women. And I think that’s true of most people. The number of women in my life where I would “believe women” and start killing people I can count on my fingers. The rest can kick rocks and do porn, idgaf.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 12:54 AM
1

The one I quoted 8 comments up.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 12:53 AM
–

I disagree with this, it completely neglects ingroup/outgroup. If I was a barbarian raider, and I killed all the men in a village and I could have my way with the women who are now slaves, they would not be in the same class as the women in my family, who would be protected from this. Obviously, we don’t have to go this extreme, but ingroup/outgroup still applies for sex workers vs. family and friends. I guess you could say it’s a rare NAWALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 12:50 AM
1

Not the bullshit one you are trying to slip in.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 07:29 AM
1

I’ve read that although you are likely missing context, not the other stuff you are making up.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 03:28 AM
1

Which handbook?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 03:23 AM
1

That is not the same as: It’s very simple, red pill is for men looking to attract fickle, shallow, selfish women for sex. Blue pill is for everyone else
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 03:14 AM
1

That’s a simple explanation of it for sure, but not a correct one.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 02:31 AM
0

SMV is about sex, not relationships. And no one said anything about mature but you, but what the sexes lust after certainly are different. If you think looks is less mature than what women lust after that’s your own anti-male bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 02:02 AM
4

I agree, looksmatch is really a nonsense term. It is not really a reality, but a morality of certain types on this sub. Lookism seems to come from men not understanding that women aren’t men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 01:22 AM
–

Why are you listening to women? Why are all the men here blue pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 12:17 AM
1

Yes, but it doesn’t have to follow every possible thing that is mainstream either in regard to dating. It’s still a specific set of beliefs that encompasses blue pill and this has been shown to you. A large portion of red pill came from famous black comedians. This is generally mainstream stuff. Is red pill mainstream now too? Your understanding of it isn’t really coherent.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:14 PM
1

Yeah, but they probably do it to correctly. Where you seem to not have a good understanding of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:03 PM
1

I do, but it doesn’t mean you can autistically ascribe it to everything. It has limitations.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:02 PM
1

That wasn’t in the matrix. Very little about men’s sexual needs in the matrix. It was mostly about evil robots and virtual reality that they contained people in. Did you even watch the movie?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:58 PM
1

Well we’ve already determined that trad con is irrelevant, and that destroyed the point that you brought up. But it does range from mainstream to niche, it’s not “not mainstream” because you don’t like it. I mean at this point you are just continuing to try and say “blue pill is things I like therefore it is mainstream, and red pill is things I don’t like and isn’t”. And that’s a very weak useless categorization which is why it is largely wrong. It not the result of someone who is taking a prope…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:48 PM
1

It isn’t, but trumps base isn’t trad con either. Trad con is blue pill cuck values, Biden types, Lincoln project nonsense. Trump had extra marital affairs with porn stars, nothing trad con about that. He’s pure red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:39 PM
–

It’s not weird or mysterious. How is everyone so blue pilled now?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:25 PM
1

Sorry, incorrect again. There are red pill women and communities around them as well. Even further, many women voted for Trump. I think 45% of college educated? Giving up is irrelevant to mainstream. None of the facts line up for you, none of the analogies line up for you, I’m assuming the only thing you have is your feelings on the matter and you don’t like the idea of it, which unfortunately doesn’t make your argument true or correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 06:17 PM
1

And “not red pill” is more narrow view than red pill. Black pillers would be like Cypher, they took the red pill then decide to go back to blue pill because they are more comfortable there.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:31 PM
1

Unfortunately, you are still just incorrect about what blue pill is. I detail it some here: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/752yjf/comment/do358z6/ Blue pill on Trump: https://np.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/5dddcb/i_stated_that_trump_made_sexist_and_racist/ https://np.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/5dkkbm/going_back_to_my_other_reddit_account_closing/ https://np.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/5c04mx/sodonald_trump_won_my_thoughts/ https://np.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:03 PM
1

It doesn’t, but that doesn’t mean Trump wasn’t red pill. Enough of the country saw that and decided that’s who they wanted elected.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:07 PM
1

I have seriously doubts about blue pill being a majority where red pill needs to be kept secret. Any of those delusions ended when we elected a red pill president in 2016. Blue pill is mainstream because it’s controlled by the elites, and enforced by strivers. Blue pill isn’t mainstream because 10 wolves and 1 lamb are deciding what to have for dinner. Beliefs like that aren’t grounded in reality and sound more like a coping mechanism for blue pillers who need to be part of the enlightened.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:04 PM
1

Incels accept mainstream thinking and societal collectivism, that’s what makes them blue pill. That’swhy they use it to those ends. Misogyny is pretty much irrelevant, anyone can be misogynist. It doesn’t define the pills.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 03:45 PM
1

Yes, and that’s fundamentally incorrect. Since these are ideologies, they require epistemological categorization.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 02:49 PM
1

Unfortunately for your argument, that’s not how mainstream is defined, nor would specifics matter for whether it’s mainstream or not, since fundamentally that morality comes from mainstream thinking. A mangled Fe colloquialism doesn’t matter for epistemological categorization.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 02:17 PM
1

They do, that’s why they push for government interventions.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 08:02 PM
1

I’m glad more people are catching on to black pill just being a new form of blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 07:34 PM
1

It’s not all mainstream beliefs. Its beliefs like: men and women are the same, and collectivist altruism is the all important morality. Which all blue pillers, MRA, and incels have in common, this is why black pill is just a form of blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 07:31 PM
1

No I did not, you either misread or don’t understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 07:27 PM
1

I don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 07:06 PM
1

It would, fascism and communism are both collectivism, but only one is tolerated on Reddit as well. Which is another common aspect of blue and black pill, they are both collectivist. Being undesirable is probably why many of them fall back into the blue pill collectivist folds, you see the same with MRAs and all of the incel type groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 05:50 PM
1

They weren’t forced to and they didn’t, or they would be red pill. Instead they choked, spit it back up, and remained blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 05:35 PM
1

I don’t think red pill believes most of that is female nature as much as often the current state of women. RP believes everyone is selfish and should act accordingly. RP are ok with assholes, black and blue pills are the ones who hold on to the “nice guy” trope. Black and blue pill are still the same in that they want to be loved for themselves which is a non-reality. Red pill recognizes the actionable reality. So really it’s still black and blue pill that conceptualize everything the same, blac…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 04:40 PM
1

Only passively, and it’s generally the more obvious stuff that doesn’t need to be discussed/debated. It’s not like there are millions of people waiting for a new place to talk about this. It’s only a very small minority of terminally online folks who want to say stuff that is more deranged.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:23 PM
1

I don’t think dating is without some novel issues in this current era, but I don’t believe there are “so many black pillers”. There are virtually none in the grand scheme of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:08 PM
1

You act like this hasn’t already been tried several times and failed. If it was possible, it would likely already exist, and honestly, the mods would probably allow it here. It’s not like this is some respectable subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:04 PM
1

I doubt the type of people who want that are capable of enforcing those types of rules. Legacy internet is over, Reddit is about to IPO. The reason so many black pillers congregate here is because they are terminally online and have no other place to go. They refuse to even go outside and try and put context into their insane beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 03:00 PM
–

Yeah, maybe not. But it will be inhabited with nothing but black pill dipshits that no one will want to debate. Discussing looks in dating generally ranges from “duh” to “brain dead”. Then since it’s nothing but a black pill sub at that point, it will become increasingly moronic and the content will become the stuff that gets you banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:56 PM
1

They are still blue pill they are just wrong. Black/blue pill is often wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 11:25 AM
2

Yes, but they are still blue pill, not red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:38 AM
1

Yes red pill was around first, but black pillers are just blue pillers who saw red pill and rejected it and remained blue pill, based on their blue pill ideals.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:42 AM
1

No it’s a black pill creation, which makes it a blue pill creation. Red pill doesn’t believe in Chad either or care to talk about him and men the way blue/black pillers do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:34 AM
1

Well black pill is very concerned with Chad and what he does, because black pill is blue pill. They cannot get over Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:32 AM
–

The first sentence is mostly irrelevant, since most people are. Except hypergamous, that’s more true of women, men are polygynous. The second sentence is true, and a difference between red and black.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:13 AM
–

It’s part of their confusion, because they have looks morality.they think “women just have a higher bar” and urge them to go to their looksmatch. It’s still blue pill lookist collectivism though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:25 AM
–

No their view of women is the opposite of red pill, and more in line with blue pill. Blue pill believes men are women, black pill believes women are men, red pill believes men and women are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:29 PM
–

No, black pill is subset of blue pill. Epistemologically it is much more like blue pill thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 01:23 PM
8

I would say it’s more consistent in quality and quantity. Married sex isn’t going to be new, but it’s rarely going to be bad like when you fumble around because you don’t know each other or are too drunk. Or at least one bad performance won’t preclude having sex again like it might in casual. Also, you don’t have dry spells, this is speaking as a man obviously. Marriage isn’t really about sex, so if you are asking what is the point in that regard it’s kind of a nonsense question. Getting married…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 04:26 PM
0

Which is why you are suffering from incorrectness. You have a bunch of assumptions that are incorrect, and they have led you to incorrect conclusions, and now you feel bad about being wrong. Doesn’t have to be that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 08:33 PM
3

I mean generally people should stick to their scene as it’s where they have the most clout and are in their element. I think your charisma is severely dampened when you aren’t. But it’s funny that you bring up that example. I played D&D and dated two cheerleading captains, so cross pollination does happen as well, but it’s a bit more rare. But if you are hanging out enough that those connections can happen, I don’t see why not.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 03:00 PM
2

I would say this is bad advice. I’m more inclined to believe opposites attract, all those shy introverted women or whatever temperament ultimately do wind up with men who are fun and have charisma at some point. If you want success as a man that is what you should aim to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 02:54 PM
5

The problem is you don’t understand women, you mention a bunch of bullshit that you think should matter and it doesn’t, because women aren’t men. You literally just have to be fun and fun to be around, and you will attract women. Being boring is the death sentence. Pretty much everything else is irrelevant. Didn’t red pill used to talk about the tingles? Is that gone now because none of you know anything anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 12:34 PM
2

Yeah, they definitely don’t have the context to interpret what people are saying. I think the biggest thing for them would just be getting some male friends, and if they have them, get them outside of whatever insular circle they are in now. I mean even friends won’t hand hold them through the process but no one will, you have to discover it on your own. Friends can at least give some good tips and sometimes be a model to emulate when they are successful. Being fun has to be one of the most impo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 05:16 AM
2

I feel like you might be a bit more equipped to give advice from what I’ve seen honestly. But women generally still give terrible advice, I see it all the time. The men here are now regarded, I can’t dispute that. However, they still aren’t listening to successful men, it’s some combination of “listening to what women say” (they believe this is candid and then somehow correct) which is another no-no, and listening to random grifters.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 08:46 PM
-2

Well you are definitely correct about 1, getting information there would be dumb and moronic. However, information from 2 and 3 is probably correct. It sounds like you had to listen to women to arrive at those conclusions which is the incorrect thing to do. The number 1 way to not understand women is to listen to women, although it might be tied with listening to black pillers. The best case is to have men in your life who are successful, and discuss it with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/24 02:29 PM
2

I’ve been around. The subreddit is weird now, I used to spend my time keeping women and blue pillers in check, and I come back and its all men and black pillers who are wrong now, and there is barely any actual red pill. Only Reddit could make me agree with women. What have you been up to?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 08:52 PM
3

This true of everyone on PPD, especially black pill/incel types, yet here we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 06:38 PM
3

Many such cases of yin and yang between the sexes, even the stuff where it’s the same, it’s still different because the sexes conceptualize it differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 06:05 PM
3

I mean to me, it is what it is, I don’t think there needs to be a solution, or I guess I should say there isn’t really a problem without a solution already. If a fling or STR gets an abortion, or has had one, this is not a problem for me. If my wife chose to have an abortion, it’s probably an issue. I mean even there, there are extenuating circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 03:16 PM
9

That’s not relevant to the point, please say on topic. The title of the OP is about LTRing/marrying women in general. This happens across all age ranges. A baby with an incompatible woman can ruin your life at any point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 03:10 PM
6

I mean you followed it sequentially onto another topic (I.e. moving the goalpost), that is correct. I don’t think a lot of men with FTO are willing to be tied down to a STR because of a baby. It ruins his life with 18 years of CS and any other responsibilities. You asking your question and changing the topic completely sidesteps this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 03:04 PM
15

Follow this exchange, it was actually you who moved the goalposts by asking why a woman would fuck a guy who wouldn’t stick around, when the topic of discussion was the man’s perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 02:54 PM
1

Well a lot of it is about intersexual dynamics that come from a positive masculine identity. Women are a pretty big part of the world. Although there is plenty of it that I’ve seen that isn’t about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 02:42 AM
1

Nah, that doesn’t follow. First of all, PUA was about getting laid, TRP was about enjoying life through finding a positive masculine identity. Many men already have a positive masculine identity so TRP for advice would be pointless for them, in the same way, you don’t need to take medicine if you aren’t sick. Many men are already red pill. Many men don’t need to talk about it or care to. Some don’t need it but are interested in how it works. You have a Procrustean requirement for this still.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 02:33 AM
1

I’d like to see this data, but I don’t think there is anything showing RPers haven’t had success for a decade. Consider they had success at the time a decade ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 02:14 AM
1

Yeah, that’s just delusional sorry. People do plenty of things for free that require effort because they enjoy it. Watching a video or reading an article or post for free is so far removed from that even.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 02:08 AM
1

Nah, the money still doesn’t matter no matter how many times you bring it up. Almost no one is paying for it, it’s irrelevant. They are just believe and talking about things. If you don’t have another way to address it, I’m just going to assume you don’t actually have argument against it except this made up argument you pretend has to matter. I bet if you asked with Q4RP, virtually no one would say they have paid for red pill advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 02:00 AM
1

No, you just can’t over the money. Money is irrelevant and in your case circular logic. You say red pill grifters just want to make money and because they can’t make money it’s not popular enough, however, there are red pill podcasters and influencers with millions of subscribers. Some of them get demonetized even, so making money on it is harder. Even still, it’s not like non-red pill/mainstream dating advice makes money either. That is also grift, so the logic fails there as well. That’s becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 01:50 AM
1

I guess my point is that it already was mainstream before PUA and TRP even so it doesn’t make sense. Not every person is interested in discussing it in a wide network. Most guys just talk with their bros in a more casual way. There are actually more mainstream red pill influencers with podcasts and all that kind of shit now than I would even expect. But that’s all because there is money involved. This seems to be a point you are unable to move past. Not everything is about the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 10:44 PM
1

Everything on the internet. Nothing is “stuck” here. That’s just not in line with the reality of how the world works.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 10:33 PM
1

It’s not stuck on a message board, just this one version of it is located here. Also, not everyone is interested in discussing it. But if you are going to discuss it you might as well be correct, which red pill is.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 10:28 PM
1

Yet it still works? Unless being successful is a self own. It’s A TAKE I guess, but a weird one. I would say the existence of the stroppy blue pilled woman is not some metric by which to judge female diversity. It’s an extremely reddit thing and/or UMC white and asian. What becomes apparent is that red pill is much more widely believed, stripped of the autism and LCD. In fact, red pill winds up being much more diverse in ideology and demographics than blue pill. To me it seems blue pill requires…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 10:07 PM
1

Why would it be different? Women are AWALT. The details are in the analysis.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 09:39 PM
1

They did? They had a term for that, they called it a field report.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 09:27 PM
1

Reality is not that black and white, you can do both.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 09:13 PM
1

If you are already doing all that why would it matter if you talk about it too?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 09:11 PM
1

Because not everything requires action. There are plenty of studies where you discuss the theoretical and don’t need to do anything. Generally, it’s where the new ideas to try come from. It got pretty autistic with TRP after a while, but there was a period where the theory and discussion was interesting. This is like any interest, if you collect something, should you not also talk about the collection? If you play a sport, should you not also talk about that sport? If you have a car, should you …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:58 PM
1

You don’t have to need red pill to talk about it. I never needed it, it was just interesting to see people discuss it in a frank manner. It explained the success I had previously which I hadn’t really thought about because no one discussed it. I mean even back in 2016 blue pill lost their shit when Trump became president calling him a red piller president. I don’t think he was reading TRP the forum though. It’s based on a set of ideals and worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 08:00 PM
1

You don’t know if they’ve made changes in their personal life. The internet is filled with people talking about everything everywhere, I don’t see why they can’t just do it because they enjoy the discourse?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 07:48 PM
1

Yeah but most of it is not the grift. There are grifters everywhere in everything I agree, including TRP. But you are talking about it as if it’s exclusively a grift.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 06:38 PM
1

The world just isn’t that Fe. Art exists, hobbies exist, people talk about things that interest them for no other reason. If you don’t understand that you have an unfortunate naive and shallow view.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 06:02 PM
1

It didn’t plagiarize it, it evolved from it. Both PUA and TRP were parts of the manosphere, along with MRA. Different goals and topics.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 04:03 PM
1

53 is solidly gen-x though. I totally believe that gen-x are a part of TRP, the matrix was peak gen-x. I don’t think any of these people were trying to write books right away either. You put enough time and effort into something, why not try and make some money if there is a market? But I’m not going to pretend a bunch of dudes discussing things and comparing notes online is a grift. Most red pillers have never spent a dime, many even believed it before they started reading it (termed as red pil…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 03:44 PM
1

It was Gen-X and millennials, no one was paying for anything, it was just people posting in blogs. Boomers didn’t even know how to use the internet yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 03:15 PM
2

When red pill started it was defined by men who were experienced and successful putting information they had learned together, so I don’t think your description of it is possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 01:50 PM
1

Well when anal week started like a decade ago, there were no incels. Everyone was having sex. Occasionally, a forever alone would show up but that was few and far between. Red pillers were rapists, at least that’s what blue pill said. They couldn’t be rapists if they weren’t having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 01:45 PM
3

Yeah but I assume they were having sex then at least. But maybe not considering all the hypothetical paternity testing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 01:39 PM
5

I remember anal week. That was back when the participants in this subreddit actually had sex though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 01:11 PM
–

Not like gay men, they get horny for a lot of things, and can simply based on looks like most men. You need charisma to make women horny, they don’t get horny for anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 05:11 PM
2

Men are not women, and women are not men. To get what you want you would have to become gay or trans. Believing otherwise is blue pill stupidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 01:55 PM
6

And when you get overtaken there goes your feminism lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 04:00 AM
7

Yet even then feminists aligned with trads and fought against conscription for women when there was actually a lot of support for it, which is why to this day women aren’t taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 04:00 AM
9

Heuristics and putting people in boxes is a pretty common thing humans do in general. It comes from certain thought processes. It’s also not necessarily a bad thing. Not everything needs to be supremely unique. It is another type of person that pushes that type of thought process as well and can’t see the forest for the trees.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 03:04 PM
1

Nah, not female friends. Most people are just friends with them to meet more of their female friends or if it turns into something else. They aren’t really just keeping female friends around for the sake of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 12:51 PM
3

I’m a millenial. Interesting that things have changed like that, at least with my generation people went out more while single, and then not as much once in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 01:22 AM
1

Just go to party’s and bars and get drunk and hook up, why does everything have to be some cold approach? Friends are fine to try and date, that’s the point when they are the opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 01:06 AM
1

I don’t believe the people on this subreddit are well suited to ideological classification. Many people can only comprehend extremely surface level understanding of concepts, or they are basing it entirely on feelings and what they like or don’t like. Or even worse they assume it’s whatever the lowest common denominator of people who claim that type say.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 09:17 PM
1

They are collectivist, anti-catallaxy and anti-heuristic, believe in sexual neurological uniformity, and top from the bottom as far as moral superiority. The antithesis of these 4 things are what make red pill red pill, so not doing them would make them blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 08:02 PM
1

Black pill is part of blue pill. They are more similar to each other than red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 07:10 PM
1

I mean you don’t hear about it. If a woman acts up you can just call her a Karen or whatever else you want to use.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 07:08 PM
1

What can they do? Could donglegate or elevatorgate happen? I don’t think so, no one cares about their nonsense anymore. Trans leaped them on oppression, especially since a lot of them were former men who probably got caught up in 2010 womens nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 02:06 AM
4

It doesn’t seem like they have, if anything, they were cowed by trans.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 01:59 AM
1

Nah, black and blue pill are concerned with studies and driving irrelevant statistics to apply to individuals, they always have been. Looks money status is black pill stupidity. Status is technically important but that was red pill beforehand, and black pill doesn’t apply it correctly. Money and looks are irrelevant focuses, and more of a moral thing for black pill. Red pill and black overlap on terminology because they were both part of the manosphere, but they are conceptually opposites as bla…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 01:31 AM
-6

No, it’s much closer to blue pill, and not just in the blue pill is anything that isn’t red pill sort of way: -black/blue pill is anti-catallaxy, and pro-studies -black/blue pill are both collectivist, one being altruist the other lookist -black/blue pill both top from the bottom, with their biggest failures being the most morally enlightened -black/blue pill both believe the sexes sexuality are the same with blue pill believing men are women, and with black pill believing women are men -Red pil…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 12:56 AM
7

That’s because black pill is the new blue pill. They are epistemologically similar. Also, all the feral women/feminists of the 2010 era have calmed down a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 12:16 AM
1

Outliers have always been blue pill nonsense though. This is another reason black pill is clearly just blue pill. A minority of people who don’t even really exist within the group of people discussing it aren’t relevant. There are other ways to slay anyway, that is the whole point of RP. That should be what should be discussed, not whining about what a minority of people can do in an above average way.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 03:21 PM
1

It’s not a meaningful metric, most people aren’t cretins or models. Most people are average and looks aren’t the issue. Even most black pillers/incels look fine, they are just autistic or have some stupid garbage they’ve bought into that is self-sabotaging.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 03:02 PM
1

Losing weight isn’t looks, it’s a change in character about respect for yourself. Being in shape is being a doer, and exhibiting masculine performance. I agree that that is helpful, but it’s not black pill lookism which is genetic idiocy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 02:54 PM
0

Nah I am just reality pilled. Black pillers are so wrong about looks and female nature that they can’t get laid or gfs because it, simply because they are wrong. It’s an extraordinary return to blue pill for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 02:10 PM
2

Maybe? But from an objective statistical perspective, I wonder if that many people are more stressed or just stressed about different things. I mean I don’t know the answer, doctors are still trying to figure it out too because they say diet and obesity and level of exercise only accounts for a part of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 01:50 AM
2

Interesting, I didn’t know that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 01:29 AM
4

No, they say even accounting for lifestyle and diet etc. something else is going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 01:23 AM
4

Colon cancer actually is on the rise, people’s asses are getting blown out younger and younger and they are moving up the screening age because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 01:22 AM
0

No, looks don’t even matter. The only way to overcome autism is to stop being autistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/24 03:51 PM
–

Thot daughter gets you grandkids, basement dwelling neckbeard son means you have to keep your guns extra locked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 07:28 PM
15

Autism is the true black pill. The looks stupidity that they bleat about is nonsense. I suspect most autistic men will struggle greatly unless they can overcome it somehow.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/23 06:06 PM
7

That’s a lot of words, but that answer is yes you need to drink, with rare exceptions. I could see some straight edge weirdo fetish community that has munches or something, but you mostly need to drink and party to hookup.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 02:02 AM
4

Red pill is detailed in the subreddit wiki and in TRP but essentially belief in the sexes being different more than similar, and individualist morality. Blue pill is not that, so the sexes being the same, more collectivist morality. Black pill is banned here, but being not red pill, it is blue pill. Blue pill proper tends to believe men are more like women, where black pill believes women are like men. Blue pill proper tends to be collectivist altruism, black pill is collectivist lookism.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 01:36 AM
4

This sounds true of a lot of the men here, however, it’s not red pill, it’s black/blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 01:02 AM
–

Yes and no, while it is important to find your niche and someone who is compatible, there are universals, like you need to learn to escalate. You can meet all the women you want, but if you don’t escalate or know how, you will always wind up in the friend zone. Also, a lot of people are boring, part of it needs to be finding a way to stand out a bit. I realize many of the people on this sub believe being boring is the morally correct thing to do, but that’s why they fail so much. This is another…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 02:30 PM
–

Yes, it’s probably the biggest issue these people have (along with the neuroticism that comes with it). It’s not that they are simply introverted and shy, it’s that there is a moralism about it. You aren’t entitled to being shy and introverted, if that ruins your success you need to change it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 04:35 PM
7

Yeah, this was red pill 101. I feel like no one even knows what the pills are anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 03:36 AM
3

I actually don’t think these guys are interested in sex, or they would do what it takes to have sex. Instead, they have a narrow set of criteria where the sex needs to happen to them because it needs to happen in a specific way, because it actually is about the validation and not the sex itself. The guys being referred to aren’t most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 10:40 PM
4

Dolly was once that age too, I don’t think current age is relevant in this regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 11:38 PM
14

I’d say it’s the opposite, if you looking to your peers that’s a problem because they should be your peers, not your role models. She’s lived a successful life, that’s worth something. Thinking you need to act like an 80 year old is completely missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 07:42 PM
8

I’m a nice guy, I like to give options. But yeah, they are on opposite ends of types of women. I feel like a Camille is more of the masculine, critical thinker, academic, willing to stand up for their issues type, and Dolly is the feminine, charming, artist, philanthropist type.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 06:13 PM
14

Dolly Parton or Camille Paglia depending on the type of woman you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/23 05:54 PM
–

If anyone disagrees with this, they are a fascist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 03:59 AM
1

I really understand what the low status men expect or want regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 08:13 PM
7

Well it’s a step up from having women do it I guess, but men still aren’t going to give a shit and willingly stop hooking up with women to make the market more charitable to low status men. The only ones who can fix it are low status men, by increasing their status.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 07:29 PM
2

You are still dreaming, time to wake up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 09:57 PM
2

You are still dreaming, time to wake up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 09:56 PM
2

You are still dreaming, time to wake up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 09:56 PM
1

You are still dreaming, time to wake up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 09:55 PM
1

You are still dreaming, time to wake up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 09:55 PM
2

My toddler could give a better description of a real man, you are a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 09:53 PM
1

Nope, you are still dreaming. Time to wake up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 09:50 PM
1

Losers agree with you, because you are a loser like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 09:49 PM
2

Not everyone, plenty of men are normal, you are not, you are the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 09:47 PM
1

Your friends are moron incels like yourself, none of you will succeed until you fix your whiny shit attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 09:45 PM
1

Being a whiny dipshit doesn’t make you a leader 🤣🤣🤣 maybe you’d have a career in comedy, but it would be one of those sad incel comics.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 09:39 PM
1

The players aren’t bitches like the you and the rest of the soft bois. That’s why it’s over for you. This is academic to me, I don’t have a problem. You all are worse than women, that’s your real problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 09:31 PM
0

Again, I don’t care about either. I don’t have some bitchy morality about this. I don’t even care that incels want to abuse women, but it makes sense that women want to avoid them because of it. It’s not good for incels to keep their stupid worldview if they want to be successful. Shyness and introversion are all garbage. Being soft is garbage. Be dominant and aggressive. Many such cases of soft intro shy garbage turning into weak FOMO and blowing everything up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 04:24 PM
0

Idgaf players or incels. Incels are whiny bitches though and that’s why they fail, I’ll punch in any direction. Players still have a sexism of familiarity rather than a misogyny of ignorance. Can’t blame players for failing though when they succeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 03:59 PM
1

Yes, the abusers are the people they know, if incels got a whiff, they would become the abusers that women know. That’s why they are smart to keep them away. The fact that that tells you I don’t know any real players tells me you don’t know any real players.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 03:39 PM
3

Nah, inexperienced guys are one step away from becoming abusers, many such cases of them freaking out with their FOMO. Guys that succeed don’t hate women like that, they don’t care about “woman’s empathy”, and “n-count/being a slut”, or any of the other inane things that the inexperienced want to impose on women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 01:53 PM
2

No, but I guess I’ll continue to let you flounder with your miserably uncharitable interpretations until you can muster something relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 04:11 AM
3

There is no oppression, you made that up, if anything it’s freedom from oppression. Nice try though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 04:01 AM
3

I reject that description. Prejudice alone isn’t worth misogyny. Otherwise nothing could be sexist without being misogynist and the terms have lost meaning. There is a difference whether people like it or not, incels are correct in noticing something that Chads do, but they are not correct in thinking it’s the same. If it was the same, incels wouldn’t have the problems they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 03:55 AM
3

Because it’s not about hating women or wanting to punish them or oppress them for the sake of it, it’s simple chauvinism. If you want to water down words so that you can pearl clutch at anything then you will lose all nuance and understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 03:43 AM
7

I can call the sky red if the sun is setting and the sky is red, because it is. It’s still sexism not misogyny, and it would be asinine to conflate the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 03:35 AM
2

Nah, sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 03:31 AM
3

Just dealing with all their annoying woman bullshit, getting hysterical, nagging, sometimes getting creepy/stalky/possessive. It’s not hating them for being women and thinking they need to be forced into the breeding pens, it’s more like not being able to take them seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 03:28 AM
3

I’d say the Chads that are successful with women have the sexism of familiarity, while incels have the misogyny of the ignorance. Incel misogyny is much much worse and more moronic than Chad sexism. One of the main differences is that they very much don’t care about n-count like incels do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 03:10 AM
4

Sure, I guess that’s true. I wasn’t thinking about paying options, and if you have that kind of discretionary income.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 04:04 AM
7

Yeah, it’s not unreasonable when you have a lot going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 03:59 AM
17

Once a week is fine if that’s what you want, I’m saying it’s still more sex than you would have if single.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 03:57 AM
52

This assumes you have to be a statistic. It’s your life, if you aren’t getting the sex you want in a relationship, you can leave. That being said, even if sex slowed to something like once a week, that’s probably still more sex than most men while single. You would have to go to really dead bedroom situations to be at the level of some AFC single guy. I feel like that’s more of a minority though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 02:04 AM
–

Yes it is. Tradcons are about being tradcon, red pill is about masculinity an as identity for men leading to sexual success.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 12:37 AM
–

No that’s black pill, red pill is about masculinity, but it’s rarely talked about here anymore because everyone is a dipshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 12:31 AM
1

So you don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 04:31 PM
1

The positive existential proclamation bears the burden of proof, prove that they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 03:42 PM
1

Except they aren’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 02:24 PM
1

Why would women as a group be held accountable? Men as a group aren’t even held accountable. Why would any group be held accountable? Individuals are held accountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 12:35 PM
1

Nah, it’s almost irrelevant, with status someone is holding the door wide open for you already.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/23 03:42 AM
1

It’s not the money, it’s the success, you don’t have to be rich if you have a different measure of success. I would say status is king in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 06:17 PM
1

Sure, I’m just saying that if a woman is with you for your looks, you are a pet and that is near cuck mentality. If anything, it’s a worse life.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 03:31 PM
1

You aren’t the you that is your looks, you are your success.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 03:25 PM
1

Your personal preferences are what subjective is, that’s why they are being invalidated, because that is the only response you can make to a subjective preference you disagree with. Objective statements would be about things outside of you, and are therefore falsifiable.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 08:21 PM
2

I mean all the surveys have shown red pillers have more diverse political opinions, and blue pillers have a very narrow set of political opinions. FWIW, I believe RP is more diverse racially as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 04:34 AM
–

You could literally watch real housewives or some other stupid bullshit to find out. Almost no one does the thing you are asking, why would you ask it on some podunk subreddit? Seems like a dumb thing to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 01:58 PM
–

Most women work, even SAHM often worked before kids. SAHW is exceedingly rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 01:54 PM
2

Mostly blue pillers calling red pillers rapists, demanding studies, saying red pill was immoral, and snark, and red pill calling blue pill dumb, naive, and unaware of how a lot of world works, and trying to make red pill more palatable. But at the end of the day it was two groups of people were successful and interacted with the opposite sex. I believe blue pill was more UMC and white, with Asian women, red pill was more diverse. The biggest points of debate were men and women being different or…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 06:33 PM
1

Before black pill, incels, and people bleating about looks showed up. Also, before the daily thread existed.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 04:37 PM
1

Nah, black pill is definitely blue pill. They are pretty much the same except for the looks stupidity that black pill injects.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 03:35 PM
3

I don’t give a shit about you and your loser opinions. You came out here looking like moron and continue to prove it to everyone. You can’t be helped.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 12:53 PM
–

Nothing is intellectual about your post dipshit, you sound like a loser who doesn’t understand people. Wit is what counts when you are trying to meet women and get laid, your lack of it is why you don’t get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 12:39 PM
3

Yes, I think most of the men on this sub who say all the weird shit suffer from the misogyny of naivety vs. the sexism of familiarity that Chad has. Which is why they are constantly confused about how Chad can be how he is but they get chided when they screech about their insanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 12:00 PM
0

No, boring personalities are also bad. There is a reason they don’t succeed as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:52 AM
4

No, shyness is bad, this is why you don’t understand personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:48 AM
3

If you were intelligent, you wouldn’t be this confused about a pretty common topic that only you and maybe 5 other autists on this sub don’t understand. Intelligence from the perspective of personality is about verbal wit, that is how it’s expressed and intuited in real life with real people. Not whatever stupidity you are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:45 AM
3

It’s more that you have time to focus on it. You are just in school and fucking around. You have time to settle down if you want kids, so not as much pressure. You don’t have to take it as seriously like a marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 03:43 PM
9

Being so worried about risk is neurotic and keeps you destined to failure. People who drink socially are better people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 01:13 PM
1

I’d say it is a majority, and it is a reasonable topic of discussion on the sub. If you don’t want to be on a sub that has that, then you shouldn’t be on PPD. I don’t think OP has concerns, they don’t reflect on her life or problems. Unless you think every topic of discussion can only be whining, in which case you very much should leave as you would never be able to debate or analyze or critique anything since it’s all just whining.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 05:36 AM
1

Who cares if they aren’t the entire interaction? They are a multitude of the interaction and specifically what the post is about. Saying anything else is a red herring.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 05:22 AM
1

But that’s not who OP is talking about, and the ones who OP is talking about are numerous. Why would you deflect and just change the subject in a response?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 05:10 AM
1

Because they aren’t, it’s not a new claim, it specifically what the OP is saying, you just ignored it for some reason and pretending like the people she is addressing are a bastion of logic and rationality. They are mad they can’t whine about their failure, or they are mad they get called creepy autistic pedophiles, or they want women to accept their insane choices. Or even worse, the women listen to incels like they matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 05:00 AM
1

Not really, it’s more of a toddler choice, they still aren’t investigating arguments. Your point still falls flat.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 01:20 AM
3

In a way, I agree that it’s much more than PUA, and it’s about actually becoming a [masculine] man as who you are. The idea is that you would naturally do things ascribed as PUA if you were RP if that was your goal. However, with the understanding of reality you have from being RP, you may not necessarily choose to go that route and go down a different path such as MGTOW or married RP. I just don’t think PUA 2.0 is apt.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 01:15 AM
1

Well PUA was supposed to tricks to the game, red pill is understanding how reality really is in regard to women, sex, and relationships. This makes it a whole ideology and lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 01:05 AM
1

Yet they are hyperventilating and hysterical.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 12:27 AM
1

That doesn’t mean they are “investigating arguments” like you said, that means they are being hyperventilating, hysterical messes. And “woe-is-me” is against the subreddit rules technically, so it shouldn’t be here.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 06:45 PM
3

What does them being adults have to do with the price of tea in China?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 06:37 PM
2

Describing what they do as “investigating arguments” is charitable to the point of absurdity. These people are hyperventilating, hysterical messes over what a small minority of weirdos are claiming about their gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 06:19 PM
1

Yeah, it literally says it in the description, discussion about sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men. Sexual strategy, strategy of the sex, I.e. male. Male strategy. Not just dating or whatever bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 06:50 PM
–

It’s exactly what the red pill is about, you are just naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 06:34 PM
3

Black pill is the blue pill that red pillers return to when they can’t deal with the red pill. They go back to believing the sexes are the same, they go back to moralism, they go back to disregard for catallaxy and a need for inhuman evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/23 02:13 AM
1

Well Forrest didn’t, but if you are an average man, and you don’t get to choose that, well then you aren’t average.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 06:18 PM
1

I mean I guess? I don’t really care to make a character assessment of a fictional sexual abuse victim. I’m just saying normal men don’t have to deal with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 06:15 PM
2

No, they make it about however you choose to find success in masculinity. It doesn’t have to be dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 05:05 PM
2

Saying it’s about dating is as wrong as saying it’s about long term relationships. It’s about sexual success as a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 05:03 PM
62

Because RPers are mostly kids trying to get laid. They can’t even comprehend having children.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/23 12:48 PM
135

TBF he is was also a bit retarded. My suggestion would be: if you have the capability to not be retarded, then don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 07:43 PM
0

If a woman cares about politics at all she’s for the streets. Lol @ different.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 02:08 PM
0

Were you trying to be dumb? I didn’t say black people invented the word. They have been using the word in modern culture and that is how it entered the manospherian lexicon.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 03:46 AM
7

“Females” comes from black culture in America, much of original RP was from black comedians. Foids, short for femoids, is incel slang. Although, I kind of like to use moids and foids personally tongue-in-cheek.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 01:58 AM
1

There are plenty of women to go around, most men aren’t catty and trying to intentionally sabotage your chances. On the other hand, women are like that. Women are competing against other women, and would probably rather have you simp for them than get in a relationship and fuck off. Additionally, women say stupid shit all the time and have no clue what’s going on. Even if they wanted to help you they wouldn’t be able to give good advice. Really, you shouldn’t need that much advice all the time a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 03:02 AM
8

female women lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 10:35 PM
1

I just told you. They only messaged hot women. What’s not clear about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 03:55 PM
1

Total numbers don’t matter, men have to message anyway just like they have to make a move in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 01:47 PM
1

If by grand portion you still mean a minority then yes. The numbers are pumped up by LGBTQ, which is another minority group. I mean I find people meeting online to be a bit dweeby, but ultimately it doesn’t matter. The important bit is the statistics from it are generally irrelevant to how most humans meet, and the findings tend to reflect the catallaxy you would expect.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 05:43 AM
1

Bizarre. If I go to a party, I talk to a bunch of people. Bar is a little different, but I’ll still talk to people. Anyway, OLD still isn’t indicative of practically anything. Need to experience things in person for it to be realistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 05:04 AM
1

In ways you wouldn’t normally interact. It would be like going to a bar or a party but no one is allowed to speak, you can only communicate by writing things on paper or typing in text, only it’s actually more severe than that even.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 04:55 AM
1

It’s an extremely filtered subset that is almost anti-optimally fascilitated.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 04:14 AM
1

“Both sexes eat, drink, sleep, and breathe, they are exactly the same bro.” No, the two different sexes have different, complementary sexualities. Catallaxy doesn’t disappear because you feel like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 04:10 AM
1

And it showed appearance doesn’t matter, because the women were still talking to a variety of the men. It was the men who didn’t message the ugly girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 04:07 AM
1

Because it’s severely divorced from reality of dating and what actually attracts the opposite sex. OLD is a good indicator of LGBTQ and that’s about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 04:06 AM
4

It’s not a fallacy, most people are not misanthropes. If they are, then they don’t need a woman either. They can live in the woods and be a hermit, who cares?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 04:03 AM
7

It depends how you define debate. Some simply see it as sharpening your claws against your enemies. In that case, this is probably the best place on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/23 11:08 PM
1

Women are nag and complain all the time, that’s why you ignore and just don’t listen to them. It doesn’t mean they are right. Everyone who complains is bad, if you encourage men to do it, you are just having them sink down to a shitty woman level and that’s terrible, it will just further them being ignored as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 08:40 PM
1

The ones who complain aren’t men, that’s for sure. Children aren’t respected, they can be cared for while young, but at some point they need to grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 08:32 PM
1

The ones who talk about it all the time are always by definition. If you don’t get that, then you just don’t understand and have warped morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 08:59 AM
1

No, you are working from circular logic assuming they are good people worthy of empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 12:41 AM
5

I will say in their defense, when you are not getting any it becomes a problem, and if you never get any, I imagine it can drive you a bit crazy. Similar things happen when you don’t have other various needs met. Like if you are getting choked out, oxygen matters big time, really quick. The rest of the time no one gives a shit about oxygen and just focuses on other things. It’s their extended rationale, that’s it’s somehow not their fault that women aren’t picking them is where it all breaks dow…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/23 12:16 AM
1

That’s not the point, because it’s mostly not true. You all just don’t see how those men are bad people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 11:44 AM
1

It’s an obvious part of the definition, I would even say whether they actually get laid or not has less to no relevance. No one would call them incel if they just didn’t get laid and never talked about it or had delusional ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 01:03 AM
1

Well it’s part of the definition. If someone doesn’t complain about not being able to get laid, and doesn’t make up a bunch of nonsense about women and reality, there would be no reason to call them an incel. Incels don’t exist in a vacuum.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 12:56 AM
2

How? Eventually there will be a group where they are successful and who the vibe with.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 11:32 PM
1

But if they aren’t talking about not being able to get laid and they are chill then it doesn’t matter. If they aren’t complaining then everything is copacetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 10:49 PM
1

No, I mean it would be part of the definition. Incel has taken over every meaning of virgins or men who struggle and who complain about it and don’t improve themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 10:47 PM
2

I feel like a guy who plays too many sports and a woman shits on him for being a loser who could never get with her because of it, sounds like some kind of comedy skit where it’s a bizarro world and there would be one actor responding appropriately and being increasingly frustrated by the scene unfolding.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 05:05 PM
1

I probably wouldn’t characterize them in regard to their inability to get laid. Why do I need to comment on it at all? If they are constantly bringing it up, I would tell them to lose weight. If they are disabled, there has to be some way for disabled people to meet each other, but it wouldn’t be on me to figure that all out for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 03:24 PM
3

That might not be so far off, especially as men discover themselves and get into their groove. That’s really what a lot of it is, as men age they get better with women and things even out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 01:24 PM
15

Yeah, it’s a confirmation bias, they are just believing something that isn’t true. Unless you are saying 80/20 isn’t any kind of fact, but just a feeling. In which case, ok I guess? But feelings should always be invalidated unless they are children.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 12:47 PM
0

Then they are in the wrong circle, unless they are the successful ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 12:40 PM
43

80/20 isn’t an experience, it would be a statistic if it were true. If 1 single man cannot get laid, it’s not 80/20, if his friends cannot get laid, it’s still not 80/20.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 12:31 PM
0

I don’t understand the relevance here, if you say things incels say, you liable to be called an incel. It is used because of the character connotations: if you are constantly whining about hating sluts and n-count it is uncouth and bad character, you can have your preferences but constantly needing to verbalize it will get you labeled, if you tell someone they would do or allow something for chad it is tedious and invalidating and often delusional, it’s just inserting your hobby horse, if you co…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 01:07 AM
0

They may have bad character sad sack tendencies that prevent their success, even if they aren’t saying they want to put women in cages or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/23 12:19 AM
1

It doesn’t necessarily, but it still might. All you are iterating is that you don’t think you deserved it, but you still might have. We can start an AITI. I’ll start: INFO.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 11:33 PM
-2

I don’t know the details, maybe you said something dumb? Not every name calling falls from the sky.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 10:58 PM
6

Well I guess it’s kind reverse golden rule? If I have to insult someone, I insult them the way they don’t want to be insulted, not the way I don’t want to be insulted. Like if you call me an incel, I’m going to lol. Further none of this happens in a vacuum, incel is concise and topical to the discussion where it’s used. If a programmer fucks up some code, I don’t call him an incel for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 10:48 PM
13

I would say incel has a larger connotation than simply “man who can’t get laid or get a woman”. Incels are generally delusional about dating, women, and often reality in general. They have bad character and it affects them more than any other trait that they may think is an issue. The above listed issues are more the problem than them not being able to get laid, which is simply a symptom of their character and behavior and that is what is being judged.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/23 10:29 PM
1

If only you could get some yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/23 04:21 AM
–

It actually was a place to discuss red pill and blue pill before a bunch of loser dipshits showed up and ruined it because they don’t actually fucking date or talk to the opposite sex, so yeah, I’ll continue talking shit, and they can continue to get no bitches. Have fun with dry dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/23 04:17 AM
–

This is not an advice subreddit, it’s in the rules. Are you illiterate? Learn to read, it may help you be less of a loser, that is my one piece of advice I’m willing to give.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/23 04:10 AM
0

Imagine being here and down, fucking pathetic. Go do something with your life, rather than whine on reddit boards.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/23 03:57 AM
3

Why would it help anyone? It’s not a self-help subreddit, people come here to dunk on losers and idiots. If you can’t compartmentalize that this place is a small minority of weirdos then I don’t know what to tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/23 02:52 AM
1

That’s not true though, even men who succeed have failed in the past as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 02:55 PM
1

There are whole industries and professions devoted to figuring out people. I don’t think it’s unknowable but I wouldn’t say it’s simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 02:54 PM
1

But then why are all these non-ugly people saying it applies to them? It’s just not correct. If they aren’t correct about that, why would we trust them to be correct about other things related to it?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 02:45 PM
1

They are in this case, I haven’t seen any evidence that research is necessary or correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 02:44 PM
2

In that case I would think they just wouldn’t want to associate with women at all, truly go monk mode MGTOW and live out in the woods, if it’s that bad. Having zero positive or even neutral experiences seems pretty extreme.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 02:43 PM
2

I don’t think those people ever learn why they fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 01:43 PM
2

Looks can be an issue for some, but whenever I see pictures of men who are struggling, I can tell the issue is not looks 95% of the time at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 01:42 PM
2

I guess I’m not big on validation of feelings, I’m probably morally opposed it honestly. What I would say is “just figure it out” and “you want cheat codes/hate women” are also garbage responses. What I find odd is that there are people who essentially say “there are some cheat codes” and it’s offered freely, they don’t care about attitudes toward women either and don’t admonish for that. But when presented with this, the men who do not succeed reject it as employing those techniques would “make…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 01:39 PM
2

It sounded like what you were implying, otherwise I don’t see the relevance of a virgin disaster to Chad ubermensch pipeline.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 01:32 PM
3

Well I don’t think women are correct usually. I agree with the saying “I wouldn’t ask a fish how to catch fish, I’d ask a fisherman.” As far as purely successful men, that seems rare and I would I say it’s less useful than the man who has both failed and succeeded. As far as the men who only fail, I think there is more to it than just considering their point of view. The world exists in a constant state of catallaxy, and there are failing points of view. Everything is part of the system, and not…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 01:29 PM
3

Well I don’t think men are largely complete failures or utter studs in general. Most men have some failures and a few successes, some people take a little longer to find their groove as well. I think the benefit in this type of thinking is the men who succeed (at least sometimes) can take their successes and help distill the good part to have more success in the future. The black and white, chad or incel thinking is another non-reality that I see constantly brought up.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 01:02 PM
5

It seems to have evolved or gotten worse. I do remember this somewhat in the past, but at least the things that were parroted were somewhat correct. What I hear now here is just a black pill fever dream.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 12:49 PM
12

I agree actually, you need someone who has both failed and succeeded. I think they will have the best view. My post and issue I see, is that it’s the ones who never succeed that think they are the most correct. This is what I find bizarre.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 12:37 PM
2

I don’t believe they can do so well, you don’t get full stories with other people. Not until they both fail and succeed themselves in enough instances do I think they can make a good comparison with others successes and failures.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 12:34 PM
2

The anxiety and hyper focus is why he fails though, he’s not being correct when he comes up with reasons. Sales are happening regardless, in terrible markets even.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 12:31 PM
–

Yeah it’s pretty frustrating considering black pill is closer to blue pill than red pill even.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 12:32 AM
6

It’s not that you can never be emotional, it’s that you can’t be like the men on this subreddit who cry when a woman says some man somewhere is ugly or she got crept on once. If the word misandry is in your vocabulary, you are too sensitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 11:29 PM
6

I’d raise them to be the next socioeconomic class up from what I was.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 11:02 PM
0

No, thats black pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 10:53 PM
1

Black pill stupidity is blue pill. You didn’t call anything out, you just looked dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 10:52 PM
1

The pathetic people are the men on this sub who are losers and can’t get laid and are boring/no fun. You blue pillers are ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 03:49 PM
1

I don’t need to, I have a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 03:47 PM
1

You can’t drink without being an alcoholic then you already have failure.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/23 03:47 PM
1

You don’t have to be an alcoholic or junkie to not be a loser. Choosing to be a loser doesn’t help anyone succeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 04:57 PM
1

It’s fueled human sexuality for millennia, choosing not to is just ignoring reality and choosing to fail. If you want to fail, it’s fine to not drink, it doesn’t matter then.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 04:55 PM
1

Not autistically
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 12:11 AM
1

I do think there are some, but it is the blue pill stance. I still think most men don’t want the type of woman who would hate and ban risky activities. But maybe this is another point that would mean black pill is actually just a form of blue pill if that is what they do want.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 12:10 AM
1

Yeah, but being neurotic about good health still makes someone a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/23 12:06 AM
14

Also a large portion of people who meet online are LGBTQ.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 10:15 PM
1

I don’t have to cope, unlike you and the rest of the people bleating about looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 10:04 PM
1

Yeah, I mean that’s the point. Those people are more successful though. You can avoid all that and remain unsuccessful, but it’s stupid to complain about it at that point, it was the path that they chose.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 09:59 PM
1

I’m not saying drinking makes you better, I’m saying not drinking or partying makes you worse. Neurotic people in thread are freaking out because they are scared to have a drink and think Chad doesn’t have to party. Chad IS a party.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 09:57 PM
0

I mean this forum is majority losers with no friends, no women, and no understanding of people, speaking about normal things tends to throw them in a tizzy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 09:55 PM
1

I agree there is more well around aspect to this, but I’ve seen posts lately where men are afraid to have a drink at a party, and have reiterated it in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 09:54 PM
1

Yeah, I mean they need to work on the timid personality more than anything else. They don’t have to basejumping, plenty of other things to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 09:52 PM
1

Sounds like it if you are still about
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 09:51 PM
1

You don’t need to do anything, you can fail any way you want to. Most people aren’t afraid to have a drink, like humans have been doing for millennia.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 09:50 PM
1

Not about me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 09:48 PM
1

You haven’t been with any women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 09:48 PM
1

Well then you can tell them to suffer and not be successful. That’s the other option, I guess they would prefer to be unsuccessful, they shouldn’t complain then.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 05:12 PM
1

Nah, I’m average, I just understand women, you don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 05:08 PM
0

It has almost everything to do with it, this is academic to me, I am successful, you all struggle, continue to be wrong if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 05:04 PM
1

In your headspace maybe, not here on planet earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 05:03 PM
-1

You sound like an unfun loser who can’t perform normal human interactions or get a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 05:02 PM
-1

Yes the boring unfun losers who can’t find a woman are the arbiters of coolness. You all are a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 05:01 PM
2

But he does anyway because he likes it, and that’s why people like him.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 05:00 PM
1

No, someone is not ontologically interesting. They can choose to do things that are interesting to people, or be boring and afraid. You don’t have to be a drunk or addict to party socially and find success.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:59 PM
-1

This is how attraction works, if you don’t understand that, it’s why you are unsuccessful.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:57 PM
1

I did in another comment already someone in this thread. They make it their core identity and character, their schedule, their diet, their interest in conversation. It should be a minor healthy habit to support other things in your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:57 PM
-2

It would be better than bleating about looks on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:55 PM
0

It’s near essential, and it’s the path to success on easy mode. Rejecting it out of fear is a character issue that causes failure in men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:55 PM
0

Yeah, that’s a separate argument though. Maybe I’ll make another post on it one day to illuminate things for the unsuccessful here.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:54 PM
1

Yeah, I agree it’s not feminist. I don’t care for feminist ideology, it harms men’s chances to listen to it. As far as faking what you aren’t, I feel there is a multitude of things you can do that are fun and interesting, someone chooses to reject all of them because of fear of injury, well it’s the fear that’s a problem. In some kind of traditional society, they would never be considered a man and worthy of a woman. I don’t think biology of attraction has changed since then.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:53 PM
1

It’s why I approve of the Hock.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:50 PM
1

I think many men ultimately do want the type of woman who are attracted to that. They blank out the means of getting there though. I do think there is a type of person not into this, and they are largely blue pill and it’s actually a smaller minority of people. Most men do activities throughout their life that bring some risk of injuries to have fun. In the end, they wind up better off from a male sexual success standpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:50 PM
1

Lifting is fine, but being a loser is not, stop being a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:46 PM
1

If you want to be a loser, fine, you just won’t be successful. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:44 PM
1

At least you recognize you have a useless woman opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:32 PM
0

It does and it always will. Character isn’t being a church boy, outlaws have no problem getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:31 PM
1

It’s good advice, telling people to worry about it is bad advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:29 PM
2

I mean it does, life isn’t like the D.A.R.E. stupidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:28 PM
4

Chad does act a certain way that’s what makes him Chad, the thing you are describing doesn’t exist on this planet. It’s a modern day boogeyman designed to exploit incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:27 PM
0

Chad IS attention seeking behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:32 PM
0

Nah, Chad is just an alpha male personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:32 PM
2

Mostly relationships start by meeting people at events. There is often drinking involved. If you can’t be human, you won’t succeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:31 PM
1

Why is your weight bouncing around so much? That’s ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:25 PM
1

They do make a man interesting, maybe because your preferences as a dommy mommy or whatever you want to prohibit it, but that’s largely not what men want either.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:23 PM
3

Why are you listening to women? Women say stupid shit all the time. Red Pill 101
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:21 PM
1

Better off than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:20 PM
0

Yes, they fail because they don’t find it fun. It’s linked to women by catallaxy. I don’t believe in the pick me shit, it’s bad character to worry about and contributes to being a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:20 PM
3

It’s the entire focus of their character, everything revolves around it, schedule, meal macros, all they talk about.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:17 PM
0

I don’t really see men taking risks consistently and failing. That is the path to success for men. Complaining and venting is annoying, that’s for children, even when women do it, it’s because of the “women are children” thing. Why would people want to tolerate that?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:14 PM
5

It’s about the mindset though, not the specific activity. I think the activities can help somewhat, but it’s mostly going to be the mentality that gets you there.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:11 PM
3

I agree, but this is why I brought up fun activities in and of themselves like team sports, motorcycle riding. Hell, they can become a volunteer firefighter, fun and more noble. None of the men who do and enjoy these sorts of things seem to have issues like the men here describe.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:09 PM
1

Yes, status is fairly important. Probably the biggest indicator of sexual success.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:39 PM
2

I guess if you are blue pill and want to find your one true love, you can meet through church or something. I feel like that isn’t a good path to success but it is a separate life script, alternative even now.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:36 PM
2

Chad does all those things too, or he isn’t Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:31 PM
2

Well risk should still be fun in and of itself. That’s the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:30 PM
1

They are irrelevant in how the people here describe them. And it’s not really worth discussing, it’s already a banned topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:30 PM
1

Yeah but you don’t have to do it autistically, it should be a minor thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:28 PM
3

I literally mentioned not war and things that are fun. Use some reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:28 PM
2

Well not whatever, don’t be a loser with loser interests. But looks are irrelevant that is correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:19 PM
3

Well I’m a man, so I’m not going to imagine all that gay shit you brought up, because it’s irrelevant and gay and a cope. War is still non-issue for western men. I agree women don’t know what they want, but neither do you. It seems like most men on this subreddit don’t anymore either. I mean if you truly hate risk that much, and don’t think women are worth it, you don’t deserve women, leave it to the real men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:13 PM
3

Believing looks matter is a cope because you are scared.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:07 PM
-2

Therapy is horseshit, it’s always been about being fun and interesting and not a loser. Lifting autistically is a boring activity.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:07 PM
-5

Therapy is horseshit, it’s always been about being fun and interesting and not a loser. Lifting autistically is a boring activity.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:07 PM
0

The risk averse here refuse to drink and party. But regardless it’s the viewing risk as a problem that is the issue. I’m talking about fun things even.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:05 PM
-1

Plenty of men’s rugby leagues, they play past 50 year olds. Don’t be a wuss.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:02 PM
4

I feel this is a more extreme form of what I am saying. They want women to take even the lowest level approach risk from them because of fear of rejection. I was trying to be a little charitable and assume some are actually trying at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:57 PM
-5

Don’t need to be extro to ride a motorcycle and be fun and interesting. I do think introversion is a moral evil and a separate issue however. One should strive to mitigate any introversion they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:53 PM
5

It is if you want to get laid and not be a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:51 PM
–

Because it is lol, why the hell do you people listen to stupid fucking women all the time? Red Pill 101 is don’t listen to women, any failure of this is your own fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/23 10:39 PM
2

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 06:03 PM
1

Inb4 a bunch of reeeing dipshit incels are upset women don’t include looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 04:55 PM
1

Well this fits more into what I am saying, the negation still properly scopes an aspect. You respect your grandma, above average human, definition 1. You do not respect religious customs or conservative political ideals, definition 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/23 12:30 AM
1

It’s not respecting a person to respect a custom. You are just twisting words around, even the dictionaries don’t align with what you are saying and you linked it to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 12:46 AM
1

There is only one definition of respect with regard to a person, and both myself and the dictionary stated it. The second definition is not with regard to how you respect a person, it’s respecting a rule, or norm, or aspect. So you are not using the word correctly. Is English not your first language? I understand there is a slight amount of nuance here that I imagine can be lost on foreigners.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 09:02 PM
1

No, you would that if you were indecent, respect has nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 06:41 PM
1

Not really. If I go over someone’s house and I respect their wish that no one wears shoes on their carpet, that’s not respecting them, that’s respecting the rule, norm, culture, or maybe even the carpet. It is nothing to do with respecting them as a person. I don’t have to tell the dictionaries, only you are using it incorrectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 06:37 PM
2

Honestly, it’s more of a check box.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 06:31 PM
1

1 is how you respect a person, 2 is how you respect an aspect or norm. So 1 is how I correctly used it, 2 is how you used it as a misnomer.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 06:30 PM
5

Respect is something you have for above average people, not just anyone. You can have common decency for anyone, but respect is earned.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 01:43 PM
2

It doesn’t say “woman” in it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 01:41 PM
1

I never said it wasn’t a choice, I said it is possible to create a generalization from them through induction, you initially said you couldn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 12:54 PM
6

No, because those women were already paired off, they were having some man’s baby. Men killed before they could find a partner means the pairing differential is altered.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 02:57 AM
5

Well even without mass war, there was still much more violence where men were killed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 02:55 AM
2

You just said you can’t, I’m confused. You can use anecdotes to make generalizations through induction, that is what I am saying. Inductions were never a guarantee, but guarantees don’t matter, just a heuristic is helpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 02:51 AM
1

Well you can through induction.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 12:35 AM
40

No, none of this tracks. Many childfree people are in relationships with other baby haters, they have partners. So this wouldn’t cause an issue of someone not having a partner. Also, many men were killed in war in recent history, the fact that men aren’t dying as much is leading to a surplus of men that women don’t want.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 12:24 AM
1

Can’t change your view, this is correct. In the past blue pill was constantly beat down because of their futile need for studies. Now men who can’t get laid and complain about OLD are carrying that torch just as uselessly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 12:20 AM
0

Chad is only a personality type.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/23 02:52 AM
1

Oh you are one of those. I’m proud to make weapons for Israel to able to defend themselves when needed at least. Unlike the scumbags digging up water pipes wrecking their own water supply to make bombs and missiles to blow up civilians.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 05:46 PM
1

You should be humiliated, you got wrecked in this exchange.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 05:42 PM
2

I agree it’s important for women and gay men, but it’s not something straight men have to worry about. Women and gay men have known looks matter for millennia though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 03:08 PM
1

From the guy whose post makes it clear he doesn’t understand what any age groups are like.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 01:32 PM
1

Next to you, it looks like am 1 zillion IQ.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 01:28 PM
1

Well really it’s more your anecdotes are worthless, and I agree I don’t know why you brought it up. But really it’s your views entirely that are worthless at this point, not being able to confront being BTFO because of them is actually an issue for you though. USA is the greatest, there is no doubt about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 01:27 PM
1

So you are just admitting to being pathetically blue pill then. I just can’t stop being right.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 01:10 PM
1

Jesus you are dumb. challenge me on my life get told your wrong whine about anecdotes You’re an absolute fucking joke, this is why you can’t get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 01:06 PM
3

I know you would agree with feminists, this looks nonsense is blue pill. It’s just deranged and divorced from reality as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 01:04 PM
0

Nah, not like men, thinking men and women are the same and visual like that is blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:59 PM
2

Nah, I was broke, and homeless for a bit too. But some women even let me stay with them. Keep coping though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:39 PM
3

First google biology and culture, and maybe you will have activated enough brain cells to have a conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:38 PM
4

I am ugly, but I still got laid bunch because looks don’t matter. Unfortunately for you, being a delusional twat will never workout.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:35 PM
0

Nebulous mutable ideas are more important than the nonsense you believe. If these looks morons understood that, then wouldn’t have the problems they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:33 PM
1

Looks don’t matter, thinking that looks matter does matter and makes you fail though, so there is that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:31 PM
1

It’s hilarious that black pillers are actually reverting to “actually we do need to be told to shower”. The minimum amount of good character needed to take care of yourself trying to be used as a shoe to so can start saying jaw again.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:30 PM
1

Because morons took it over as everyone became more terminally online. If you want to be successful be masculine, if you want to continue to be a loser whine about looks. Someone who takes care of themselves is an indication of good character and personality. Constantly complaining about jaws and height makes you a dope.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:27 PM
-2

How does this follow? Just because of a bunch of dipshits are wrong about how much looks matter, doesn’t mean it’s a Just World.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:47 AM
-5

Looks don’t matter for red pill, red pill is just pro-masculinity. Looks being everything is a darker, more r-slurred pill that is banned because it’s so wrong and useless to debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:35 AM
2

people self censoring From your mouth to God’s ear. 🙏
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 12:32 AM
54

I mean TBF someone can have higher n count/sleep around a bunch and also have a high standard. I would say this actually is normally the case, hence all the angst you see. Sluts can sleep with a lot of dudes, just not losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 11:10 PM
8

It’s probably a bunch of losers using it that way. The point of “tingles” originally is that the female sex drive is reactive and inspired, and lusty vibes need to be created, not spontaneous and looks based like black pilled dipshits believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 09:49 PM
–

Human Resources, the group that handles workplace harassment issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 09:33 PM
1

Looks don’t matter, 99.99% of the people complaining about it look fine or have potential and don’t take care of themselves. 100% of the time their personality is atrocious dog shit. So again to reiterate: the common theme among men who can’t get laid isn’t that they are ugly but that they have terrible personalities.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 09:25 PM
3

Believing this definition matters is having a bad personality, I guess it’s truly AIDS and attacks any ability for you to have sexual success.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 09:42 PM
4

None of this autism changes what normal people colloquially call personality. None of this alleviates you from the terrible nature of a personality that lacks being fun and interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 09:40 PM
6

It’s an excuse to party, get together with friends and have a good time. If you can’t learn to enjoy that then yes, your personality is bad and a problem. Most people are only watching sports some of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 09:38 PM
2

Ok, I’ve seen you make this claim several times now, are you foreign or is English not your first language? Because you seem to have it backwards, being a goody goody church boy is not a good personality, it’s just becoming more moral, which is arguably a bad personality since everyone hates the morally righteous.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 08:38 PM
7

Improving personality is becoming more fun and interesting. Not whatever you just described. If anything your description of personality is like “calling a car’s tires an engine”.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 08:35 PM
2

It’s all part of having a fun and interesting personality. The people on this sub are r-slurred about what they think is attractive. Even in this thread there are a bunch of dopes bleating about looks nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 08:29 PM
-1

Looks don’t even matter, so this post is kind of nonsensical. If you have chemistry you aren’t being settled for, if she was with you only for looks you would be being settled for, you would just be a gay Instagram prop.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/23 04:43 PM
19

All pill cucks in shambles at PPD’s return.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 12:37 AM
4

They start to say it doesn’t count unless it’s a very specific type of relationship with a specific type of woman. Like she needs to be a 10/10 woman who doesn’t work, but is also insanely rich and doesn’t want a relationship but simply wants to be your fuck buddy or FWB, and if you can’t get that then it doesn’t count. Nothing grounded in reality though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 01:12 AM
2

80/20 was always one of the more incelly retardations. Now that black pill has broken off and consolidated the garbage, I would assume there would be less of it. Red pill was always more for AFCs.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 03:11 AM
3

Why, this seems like something red pill would agree with?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 07:28 PM
1

No, you believe in negotiating attraction. Words aren’t necessary either, although they are often used. Only the asocial looks nonsense is peddling sigma shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 06:01 PM
1

Nah, this is retard sigma shit. Looks are not the issue, never have been, never will be. I’m ugly, get laid all the time. Autists just want to seethe about having to be good looking while remaining autistic. It’s not going to happen sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 05:29 PM
1

I don’t, you do. Editing your looks is a part of a negotiation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 05:10 PM
1

No, you can’t negotiate attraction, you are blue pill if you believe that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 04:51 PM
4

Yeah, I honestly liked the red/blue debates better. Blue pillers felt like a more respectable opposition. Black pillers bleating about looks all the time when they have never experienced life and only have information from things online is kind of dumb. They are barely worth it to acknowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:54 AM
3

I’m still around occasionally. I don’t know if any of the other old people are still around.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 01:49 AM
-1

I was ugly and successful, it didn’t negatively affect me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 01:01 PM
-3

Nah, looks don’t matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 12:21 PM
1

I didn’t come to that conclusion, I said red pill is a wider ideological space. Blue pill is mostly MC to UMC white people who are radlibs and require that conformity, red pill ranges from liberal to conservative, LC to UC, and have a much more diverse demographic set as far as minorities go. The surveys are linked in my other comments and are on the PPD sidebar.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 11:39 PM
1

Yes and since red pill includes them while blue pill does not, they wind up being more diverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 01:45 PM
56

Don’t use online dating, it’s just about the stupidest thing I’ve seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/22 06:18 PM
1

actually here is a link to where I’ve addressed this before
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 11:30 PM
1

I literally just said radlib, it’s wholly concerned with that. It’s why they hate red pill, it’s why they had a meltdown when Trump got elected, it’s why they support and are linked with every other radlib thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 11:25 PM
3

Nothing in his comment contradicts what I said. Blue pillers are nothing but narrow minded radlibs. Red pill also contains people who are not narrow minded radlibs, but includes liberals themselves, like the user you linked to. Edit: On a separate note, something he is wrong about is that he said incel/black pill is red pill. It’s not, it’s blue pill but r-slurred.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 11:13 PM
-1

You join social circles for socializing, not for women. The whole means to an end thing is r-slurred.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 11:08 PM
4

Red pill is more diverse in demographics (lower class and more minorities) and has wider ideology. Blue pill is essentially a single ideology (yes, “not-red pill” is a more narrow view than red pill itself). You can check the surveys and see it for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 10:02 PM
0

It’s actually not that hard, I’ve moved every few years all over the country (post 25) and I’ve made new friends each time. If you think it’s insurmountable, then it’s still a you problem, and likely why you will continue to fail with women. Looks don’t matter, your social skills are trash.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/22 09:54 PM
2

Nah, looks don’t matter. Ogres are out there crushing it. Status > personality >> height >> money >> looks. Believing anything else is delusion and c0p3. Don’t give them an inch. Unless you are talking about women, looks do matter for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 12:32 AM
1

No, I definitely like to go out and do stuff a lot. But this subreddit definitely leans towards people that don’t have friends and would rather be terminally online shut ins that barely tolerate even talking to their partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 06:53 PM
1

Female sex drives don’t care about reality, masculinity still reigns supreme.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 10:33 PM
1

Those aren’t looks, looks is just facial gayness.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 10:31 PM
1

No, it makes you more confident because you are less of a useless weakling. Looks don't matter except for gay men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 05:22 PM
1

Your whole post is claiming the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 04:53 PM
2

it doesn't matter what I think or what they think about their bodies. They can have body dysmorphia if they want. It's just not what is effective, because it's not what matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 04:26 PM
1

Because it’s not about looks? You keep talking about looks and it was never about looks, looks don’t matter. You go to the gym to have confidence in yourself that you aren’t a weak bitch, you don’t need to autistically grind into some superhuman looking thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 04:05 PM
3

Going to the gym wasn't about looks, it was about masculinity. You are still stuck on the looks stupidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 03:42 PM
1

Nah, that’s a waste of time and money, and is ultimately cucked, and possibly r-slurred.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 03:56 PM
1

Yeah reality is the best source, it’s weird if y’all don’t live there.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 06:07 AM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 11:46 AM
1

What causes the psychological damage? Anime for sure. If you force them to stop watching anime and shame them for it, it will help. My source? Reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 01:28 PM
1

They don’t really abide by individualism from a sexual perspective, they do more along other lines
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 03:15 AM
1

I would revoke women’s cold approaching license if they had one.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 10:49 PM
0

It’s not just that it’s unexpected, it’s odd and undesirable to have women approach and try and game you. Better to just be receptive as a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 10:46 PM
8

That's because blue pillers never wanted to cede any ground to red pillers, but they actually agree with red pill since it's just reality but said in a sexist way. It took black pill existing for them to start to do so however. They still try to make fun of red pillers, and don't have any qualms about going after looks, since crying sexism is a tired trope and no one really cares anymore. They used to call red pillers rapists more, but that has stopped because red pill doesn't even debate LMR an…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 02:32 AM
1

Because the women like her are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 12:30 AM
2

Not sensual at all, just has gross vibes in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 12:22 AM
2

Taylor Swift is bad at sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 12:14 AM
1

It’s in the post. Looks don’t matter. Blue pill and black pill are pretty much identical. The only difference is that black pill focused on r-slurred looks nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 04:18 PM
1

Not it’s not how red pill describes itself. People don’t matter and are largely stupid, I’m talking about the concepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 04:16 PM
1

No, looks and sexism don’t matter. Black pill and blue pill are identical on fundemental concepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 12:47 PM
1

No, it’s similar to blue pill and not the red pill. Well similar to blue pill, but more incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 09:59 PM
0

The only time I’ve heard of them losing friends and family was when the blue pill cult was told to excommunicate them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 09:58 PM
1

And why did that happen? Because hysterical blue pillers whipped themselves into a frenzy about it? This is just a new phase of regressives, like in the old-timers who thought rock and roll and D&D was leading to devil worshipping. Only now it’s with meme politics and the liberal blue pill types are The Man now.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 09:30 PM
2

Happens all the time, if you’re the kind of man who is fun to be around. Relaxed and at ease in his own skin, with reasonable or better yet no expectations beyond have a good time. is a woman. FTFY, most people don’t live in bizarroland like y’all.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 08:57 PM
1

No having a mental breakdown is being unable to function, live your life, go to work, etc. memeing conspiracy theories with your friends and having a good time with it is chill.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 08:18 PM
1

Yeah, but they are having fun with it, not having mental breakdowns.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 07:53 PM
1

Actually, after that happened I befriended her. She most certainly was a woman, plenty of the other people on this subreddit, both men and women, know her as well. She was attractive and had zero self awareness, and she too thought blue pill was simply just making fun red pillers, but she learned the hard way that that was absolutely not true. She’s married and has a couple kids now anyway, many people abandon the blue pill nonsense and get on with their lives. If anything is cult-like, it’s the…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 07:51 PM
1

Red pill can be about a lot of topics, but red pill on this subreddit refers specifically to dating. Within the sexual red pill, a lot of red pill came from black comedians too, I’m aware of the history. None of this is about the foundational concepts though which is where blue pill and black pill are the same. The looks nonsense is a manifestation or expression of it, but has nothing to do with the foundation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 07:32 PM
1

I don’t think it’s that much different, a lot of normal people are fucking dumb. Even the trans nonsense that I thought was a minority is fairly pervasive. Again, you aren’t looking at concepts, random statements don’t matter, even less than looks. All of those statements come from the same fundamental beliefs still though, which only makes my argument stronger.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 06:21 PM
1

Are you claiming blue pill ironically banned another blue piller for her politics? That’s the most brain dead thing I’ve heard all day, and you have tough competition from the black pillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 06:11 PM
0

UMC white liberal is mainstream, and it’s part of the dominant social force. It is just not the only one. Red Pill doesn’t need to pin anything. They can actively reject it and go for a different more red pill class. They still need to frame it and know what blue pill is, and it is easily definable, much to blue pill’s protests.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 05:47 PM
1

Legally, you might be able to, depending on the circumstances. Maybe, the one who was killed needed to die though, plenty of people who needed to die were killed, why would I be blaming the killer’s success in that case? Didn’t you just link me to an article which referenced The Executioner, who was charged with (the task of legally) killing Nazis?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 04:52 PM
1

No, you can’t. People are legally killed all the time, like in war. However, if you murder someone, then you can be legally charged with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 04:39 PM
1

Isn’t it the other way around? Like let’s say I accidentally elbow someone and hurt them, but I didn’t mean to. I would say “my bad” and assume it’s my fault. However, if someone pisses me off and want to deck them, and successful connect my fist with their mouth, then I have succeeded in hitting them. You can’t blame someone for a success. You can only blame the person who did not want to get punched for being punched, as they did not succeed in not being punched. Now, if you mean legally, ther…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 04:36 PM
-1

Blue pillers tend to be overwhelmingly white UMC liberals, I know you are not (at least white UMC). They do share beliefs on similarity between the sexes. Blue pillers also hate putting people into boxes and categorizing them. Further, their morality is very much against selecting for the self over categorized outgroups. There is also often shared belief about a true self, and placing high value on identity. These are all fundamental beliefs that lead to a lot of similarities.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 04:14 PM
2

https://reddit.com/r/Drama/comments/5e5tdd/a_blue_pill_user_gets_featured_in_srd_for_having/ She actually got posted to nice guys as well, and demanded it be taken down there too. Her name was blocked in the post, so she essentially outed herself, which makes it kind of funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 03:49 PM
0

Because blue pill requires an ideological consistency, if it didn’t, then it wouldn’t. Blue pillers are less diverse in almost every area, ideological beliefs, demographics, even the PPD surveys show this. Yes, this is the same person.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 03:49 PM
2

Whether it’s legit or not doesn’t matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 03:45 PM
1

Nah, EmilyCharland blew up that blue pill lie years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 03:41 PM
2

Again, being “not red pill” is often a more narrow ideology than red pill itself. Blue pillers are very unified and similar in their thinking. In fact, black pill was the first new difference seen to blue pill in a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 03:38 PM
1

That article also says some psychiatrists said they had issues and the one that said they didn’t was in no way definitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 03:31 PM
2

That article says they found the nazi were mentally ill for various reasons, just they didn’t have one common criminally insane trait. Which yeah, makes sense, they were mentally ill, there just isn’t some specific nazi gene that caused it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:56 PM
1

Are you talking about the political nazis, or just like the German people? The political nazis were mentally ill, they even made examples of their own people and did all kinds of mentally ill shit. The German soldiers were likely following orders a lot of the time. But soldiers at war doesn’t really support misogyny/hatred being the prime cause. Soldiers fight because they are proud of and support their country, otherwise you could just say it about every nation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:31 PM
1

They were mentally ill, but they did hate Jews.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:25 PM
2

Not what red pill is, try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:22 PM
2

I think mental illness causes murderers, misogyny is just an expression, but it could be any group.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:14 PM
2

Just say you don’t know what the word means, it’s fine. No one cares about your identity nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 12:58 PM
1

It is true. I don’t care about misogyny, sexism, or misandry, concern with them is all nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 12:54 PM
2

I think both sexes view each other as secondary, the feminine perspective just does it implicitly and indirectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 12:49 PM
3

Sure, many men do that. I think the sexes desires are somewhat adversarial, but it’s a healthy competition that keeps humanity going. Because the sexes are not the same, there are no optimal solutions (think Thomas Sowell’s unconstrained vision), only best practices that form through compromises.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 12:44 PM
1

It might not be so bad then, I’d have to see what sort of constraints were made around it though. I feel attraction tends to be more action based for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 12:17 PM
2

No, red pill believes in sex differences and individualism, if you are blue pill because you are NOT red pill, then you believe in sex sameness and collectivism, and it’s the only place left to go. It is exclusive and exhaustive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 12:09 PM
2

Just because you don’t understand philosophy doesn’t mean it can’t be done. Like I said, some people are just not capable. Misogyny doesn’t really matter. Your understanding of red pill is extremely wrong. I can’t tell if you can’t understand it intellectually or you can’t handle it emotionally or both. This sounds like you are coping because you need justice and require doom and gloom for them. The blue pill (and now black pill) has always done this, because they need it to make sense of their …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 11:52 AM
2

Your synopsis misses the concepts about what red pill and blue pill (and therefore black pill) are. Red pill is just the belief the sexes are different combine with an individualist moral philosophy, blue and black are the opposite of that, sex sameness and collectivism. Black pill just also erroneously focuses on looks, but it’s just a form of blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 11:33 AM
3

I don’t think think black pillers are nihilist. I think they believe looks/genetics are the reason for existence. Unironically Zoolander.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 11:29 AM
1

It’s not about blaming women, it’s about taking looks as a focus and applying it to blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 11:28 AM
1

I don’t care about the people, I care about the concepts. However, I don’t think speed dating speaks much about people meeting organically, it’s almost as bad as OLD.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 10:55 AM
2

Not with any regularity like men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 10:51 AM
3

Sure, I think they can, but I feel it’s a minority of women. Black pillers try to hyperfocus on this group to support their view.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 10:48 AM
2

It doesn’t matter how blue pill describes itself, it matters what blue pill is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 10:43 AM
1

Red pill isn’t clinging to anything, it was always there in some form. There is nothing scary about black pill, it just seems wrong and not connected with or describing reality at all. As far as listening to women, there was no red pill that advised that. They advised only listening to other men who were successful with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 03:05 AM
3

No, they often have mental illnesses, and take pride in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 02:10 AM
1

Nah, black pill is similar to blue pill and feminism really in its collectivist tendencies. Red pill bloomed at the peak of when feminism was r-slurred though, after feminism waned, red pill did somewhat too.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 02:09 AM
1

Blue pillers don’t believe every thing is fine, they often have mental illnesses. There are a multitude of similarities.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 02:06 AM
1

Nah, it’s possible to put different beliefs into different boxes. Philosophers have been doing this for millennia. Not everyone chooses to be willfully ignorant all their life, some simply aren’t capable. Doesn’t mean the rest of us have to be. As far as buying things, I haven’t spent any money, and I enjoy my time debating. I don’t have to run around getting pissed off that people have beliefs different from me like y’all.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 02:05 AM
1

Right, I’m not saying blue pill believes in looks but that black pill took blue pill and made it about looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:56 AM
1

You could always be a lesbian I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:48 AM
1

No, I still disagree. I don’t think black pillers are nihilistic, they believe genetics and looks are pretty much the reason for existence, literally lookist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:48 AM
3

I’m speaking American. Back when I was younger, there used to be a term guys would use when they talked about trying to get with women, it was called “chasing tail”. As for “persuasion”, I never used that word.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:39 AM
1

Most men don’t have that level of disgust.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:34 AM
3

An insignificant minority, but plenty probably try and tell themselves otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:34 AM
2

Same shit. Do you think I mean literally chasing women around with a club?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:32 AM
5

Yeah but I’m not talking about lesbians and bisexuals, they don’t matter to intersexual dating. Well I guess bisexuals can, but it’s still weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:31 AM
2

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:29 AM
3

They don’t dislike simps, they use simps, but the solution is to just not be a simp. Women tend to still like masculine interest in my experience though, and that doesn’t require being a simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:27 AM
1

No, you did two different things. You described imperatives for blue pill, and then made epistemic statements for black pill. Black pill believes you should be a good person by dating your looksmatch as well. Blue pill also understands the reality that some people are assholes. They are still conceptually similar here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:25 AM
3

It’s not about being won over, it’s about being chased and being made to feel sexy by men that are interested. Women who are not like that are a smaller minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:19 AM
-1

No, genetics don’t really matter. You can go to a Walmart and see that is simply not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:18 AM
0

Black pill is as antithetical to red pill as blue pill is, because black and blue are so similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:17 AM
2

I’m talking about the people who can read or know about red pill ideas even not on the internet and disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:15 AM
3

I’m not buying anything, it is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:03 AM
5

Reactive as opposed to spontaneous. For example, men will see pictures of women and disembodied genetalia and pop boners for it, that is spontaneous. Women on the other hand tend not to do that, and become hot for men that are chasing them and trying to win them over, that is reactive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:02 AM
1

Red pill did not start as advice, it started as truth about the sexes. Black pill abandoned the truth and does not have a connection with reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 01:00 AM
0

Red pill does battle black pill now, but that is only because black pill is blue pill. Otherwise, it would have become some kind of ally within the manosphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 12:58 AM
0

The looks were never really discussed by red pill, it was about masculinity. A portion of that happens to be aesthetic, but it was not a large focus.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 12:57 AM
7

That’s kind of a stupid conception. If a red piller makes fun of red pillers, then he/she is a blue piller too? Anyone with more than a few brain cells can see that blue pillers have consistent beliefs other than “laughing at red pillers”.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 11:22 PM
1

Yeah, I think both sexes can improve with charisma/charm and character and style improvements.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 11:03 PM
4

Black pillers seem to believe the reason for existence is looks. Almost like Zoolander or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 10:59 PM
1

Usually not. TBP was having full mental breakdowns on the regular.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 10:56 PM
-3

Even what you just said is in line with my post. Black pills think looks (genetics) are everything, as if most women spontaneously respond to that, when they don’t. That would be a blue pill belief that men and women are the same, because it is something men do. Edit: to respond to your edit, no red pill does not think that women are as looks based as men, that’s black pill nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 10:52 PM
6

Blue pillers like to say that, but time and again, it’s been shown that blue pillers have similar beliefs, and it is often a tighter ideology than red pill itself. It wasn’t like people in opposition to the red pill were wandering around without a thought before they came here. They had thoughts, and those thoughts were similar, so we categorize them blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 10:45 PM
3

It’s the other way around, personality, presence and charisma impact how people perceive how you look.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 04:58 AM
0

Nah looks don’t matter. Personality, presence, and charisma do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 11:47 PM
2

I am below average and I slayed. Most dudes who don’t get any, don’t do anything but still look decent.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 11:24 PM
1

You don’t have to be though, makes it much more important.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 11:21 PM
2

Nah, the looks don’t really matter. Plenty of ugly dudes do fine, they just go out and have good game.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 11:17 PM
2

Game is much more important than looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 11:02 PM
2

Nah, game is much more important than genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 11:00 PM
1

I’m confused. You’re telling me that the early denizens of PPD actually knew each other? Over Reddit? I find that hard to believe It’s definitely how it is, I’ve been a part of this community for like 8 or 9 years. That’s PPD specifically, not even red pill. Many blue pill women like red pill men. I don’t know what to tell you. to the exclusion of everything else I didn’t say this. Y’all accuse random women over the Internet that you don’t know of lying when they tell you about their thoughts an…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 05:19 AM
1

The women you’re speaking to on here are not the same women whose actions don’t go along with what women say on here. Yeah, but many are. Things are different now, but I had known many of these people for years, we are connected on social media, voice and video chatted. Many people have even met in person. I’m fully aware that some women are stupid and shallow, but if you ask me a question, I’m going to answer from my perspective, not theirs. I can’t explain or justify the stupidity or shallowne…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 02:17 AM
1

Well I’m not super interested in women bad. And 4 years ago, the discourse was still much more RP focused than this r-slurred black pill shit. Even autism hadn’t gotten as big as it is now. The point wasn’t that women would be bad for picking the sexists, we just know it’s true. I am pro-sexism, even a Chad’s Rights Activist. I hate the way the losers here hate on him and the women who like him. Women picking autism is just some heavy virtue signaling, which is what the post highlighted for many…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 11:34 PM
2

There was only 1 question that needed to be asked of women, and I already asked it over 4 years ago. The responses told you everything you needed to know about how women answer questions here. https://reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/7j77ao/q4women_if_you_had_to_choose_one_would_you_rather/ If questions about shortness bother you enough to make a post about it, you might be too sensitive for PPD though. When this subreddit started 8 or 9 years ago, you couldn’t get through a single convers…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 08:03 PM
1

I’m alright, these fucking retards didn’t bring in my floor so now I have to carry it all in.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 07:09 PM
1

No, it’s status > personality > height >> money >> looks. Money and looks pretty much don’t matter at all, but looks even less than money.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:15 PM
1

It’s weird that you don’t think people go out to meet people. I don’t know what planet black pillers are from, but it’s not Earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:10 PM
2

Cope. They could do that at home if they wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:08 PM
1

Nah, I get laid, you don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:05 AM
1

Cope about cope harder. You are failing, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:40 AM
1

No, just truth. Sorry, you are the clown world.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:30 AM
1

Lol, damn you are pathetic, and your failure is the real cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:29 AM
1

You have the beliefs of a clown, that why no one takes you seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:09 AM
1

You will never succeed while coping like you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:07 AM
-1

It’s the truth, Chad was only ever an alpha male personality. Belief otherwise is just single digit IQ shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:06 AM
2

It’s an inaccurate model, most men don’t wind up permanently alone. Obsessing over looks is for shit for brains.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:05 AM
1

Nah. You should go outside more.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:13 AM
1

Not a burn, just the truth. You are insane, and that’s why you can’t get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:12 AM
1

Nah, regular or cute women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:10 AM
1

Nah, but you are retarded as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:09 AM
1

You are delusional, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:09 AM
-1

Chad is only Chad because of his personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:08 AM
1

Nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:26 AM
1

I mean both of those guys are kind of insane, you don’t need to look like either to get a girl or get laid. I don’t know why people think they deserve a certain type of person either. Depends on the amount of work you put in.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:25 AM
1

Gym doesn’t really seem to be looks, because when you tell black pillers to hit the gym, they start whining about jaws and shit that doesn’t matter. So “looks” is just everything that does not matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:50 AM
1

Yeah but going to the gym isn’t looks, it’s part of frame and personality. But either way, plenty of average girls out there, better to select for compatibility than strictly looks in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:41 AM
1

Frame definitely helps, but most men can ogremaxx no problem. The people who struggle are never even that bad looking, it’s all cope for mentalcels.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:14 AM
1

Yeah, I mean I don’t care about red pill that much. But it’s still better than black pill. No black pillers call out their own stupidity, or it wouldn’t be an issue, or exist in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:08 AM
1

Looks only matter for gay men. If you are trying to have sex with Chad, worrying about looks makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:06 AM
1

I literally don’t care about any of that. But anything is better than black pill at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 01:22 AM
2

Neither am I, I only ever found the pill stuff because people were being correct, until the black pillers showed up and spread their feces and failure on everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 12:39 AM
0

Neither am I, just pointing out that you are a clown.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 12:36 AM
1

You don’t know what being a man is lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 12:31 AM
0

Nah, that’s for losers like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 12:25 AM
0

That’s because you got more retarded as this thread went on. Your brain is rotting like your genitals because you use neither.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 12:23 AM
3

Anger is better than any of your retard shit. That’s why I get laid and you don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 12:16 AM
4

Stoicism is for weak, boring ass bitches.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 12:10 AM
2

Field Report: I went out and wasn’t a fucking idiot black piller obsessed with looks, had fun, and got laid. The End.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 12:04 AM
6

If that means: gets laid and is not a moron like you, then yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 11:56 PM
0

I’m sure that’s why they go out to bars and clubs and parties and meet people every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 11:26 PM
-1

Leave their comfort zone and become men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 11:25 PM
2

Tinder is cope. Go outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 11:24 PM
1

Y’all are still too retarded to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 07:50 PM
-2

I don’t need to tell myself shit, I’m fine. It’s you all who are pathetic and only losing ground.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 06:50 AM
-1

Imagine actually believing all that clown shit and still not being able to get laid lol. Black pill is just regressing into retardation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 06:38 AM
-5

no, black pill is clown shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 11:11 PM
1

Nah, it’s not.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 06:16 PM
3

You are correct, no one ever talks about it in a meaningful way. They use it to cope and shift responsibility so they can continue to have a retard personality and jack off to anime.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 06:16 PM
5

35M, ENTJ, was originally RP when I found it like 9 years ago, not because I was looking for help but just people were being correct in an increasingly retarded world. This was shortly after atheism+ split, elevatorgate, donglegate, the guy with the tacky bowling shirt landed the robot on the asteroid and a host of other white people nonsense. The latest incarnation of RP is much more LCD, so now I am more drokpilled than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 11:35 PM
2

Looksmaxxing is not red pill. That’s black pill retardation that seeped in.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 03:01 PM
1

Rarely need it anymore. I could see it for covering the hotel cost without a paper trail, but I wouldn’t go to seedy places carrying extra cash like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:13 PM
1

Why did you have money on you at all if you were planning to salt?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 05:00 PM
1

Well in that case the girl would have 0.092 dpf, which is significantly higher than a 0.001 dpf from before she went on a bender. I do agree we need another metric, however, this is where the slut mass that leads to slut impact might come into play. Since her dpf has been increasing and rather rapidly, there is something of note going on that could point to a larger issue. And you don’t need to scale it all the way to 100 dudes here. Slut impact is going to provide that clue much sooner. I still…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 05:54 PM
2

Slut velocity and slut impact: Slut velocity is measured in dicks per fuck, which you still want low, much lower than 1 dpf. So for instance if you have a woman that has sex with 1 man 500 times because they are dating, and she has only had sex with him. That’s 0.002 dpf, N count 1. If another woman had 2 ONS with 2 different guys and 2 short flings with 2 other guys 4 times each, that’s 0.4 dpf, n-count 4. Now if you take the original example and the woman has 3 more relationships where she has…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 12:31 PM
8

“bunch of men” some having sexlessness in their name Lol, it’s one person and he gets dunked on regularly for it. Ironically, the guy isn’t even incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 01:07 AM
1

Shaving your beard or changing your major shouldn’t be done. But as a man, you should be getting rid of any cats. They are garbage creatures and you don’t need a woman to tell you to get rid of it. Owning a cat means you have the kind of personality that is going to prevent you from getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 01:16 PM
2

It’s not a challenge, women are straight dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 01:00 PM
1

You make a mistake in assuming debating here is about changing the other person’s mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 02:40 AM
2

Some people enjoy being angry. I know I do, and a few others here do as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 02:39 AM
2

Well that’s true.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/21 12:23 AM
14

I think hot women can get access just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/21 12:17 PM
1

Not like the lowest tier men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 03:24 AM
3

Exactly, my initial statement was just a correction to OP on what women’s actual advantages are. While they struggle more to push past the ceiling, they also don’t fall as easily through the floor. I understand why things are the way they are, and they make sense to me. I’m not upset with it or interested in changing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/21 03:20 AM
6

I’m not complaining, work on your reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 05:46 PM
8

No one has to do anything, I’m telling you what’s happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 05:20 PM
1

Well systemically, protecting damsels in distress still has its pros. I don’t think the solution is just to shit on everyone. The people you are thinking of as irreplaceable aren’t weak, they are at the very top, which is exactly the point. It’s the floor that is elevated for women. Most homeless people are men for instance. You can want what you want, I don’t really care, women still have an elevated floor.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 05:18 PM
16

Well men compete, so this probably won’t happen. It would have to come from women and they don’t do it either. I’m not really talking in shoulds though. Systemically, there are still pros to it. I just think it’s weird to say the notable female advantage in life is “easy sex”.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 03:48 PM
45

The privilege isn’t that women have an easier time finding sex, it’s that they have inherent value and soft power. If a woman does nothing, she can still be desirable and not expendable. Also, she can influence people from a position of weakness with soft power (e.g. damsel in distress). Weak men are seen as beyond useless and ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 01:59 PM
6

I am S E E T H I N G.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/21 01:40 PM
2

What was it like? Awesome and fun Do you think it helped you when it came to having casual sex if you were in to that sort of thing? I don’t know how you would do it any other way. Any regrets? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/21 11:12 AM
2

Delta awarded
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 10:00 PM
11

sluts bad >:(
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 09:11 PM
41

I’m married and I never had to use the garbage that is OLD.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/20 07:50 PM
4

People who believe this is equivalent to horoscopes are kind of dumb and ironically always get categorized as a specific type when they take it lol. Almost like the theory is onto something.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/20 03:35 PM
2

No one believes the gender wars are new. This post is nothing but boomer cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/20 01:01 AM
5

No, I’m fine with what it is as far as formal debate level. I could do with less incels and black pillers but that is a separate problem. I liked it more when they were a minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 05:25 AM
54

As someone who has been here since the sub started, it has never been quality discussion. PPD has always been ratchet. Why would that change now all of a sudden at 63k subscribers, with an insane amount of people who don't even really understand the initial red/blue dichotomy?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 02:27 AM
11

A lot of people do care. It becomes increasing weird to have single opposite sex friends when in a relationship, and will be a red flag for many. Even single same sex friends can be a strain. Most married couples are friends with other couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/20 06:40 PM
1

I think I missed the zoom thing, I might do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/20 08:15 PM
1

Yeah, I don’t think they need to settle for, I think it can just be a good match up, despite what a lot of people here say.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/20 05:27 AM
2

No one selects for n count, but those high n count women might settle down with a low n count man, and that is fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/20 01:41 PM
6

I have literally no clue what you are talking about. I can’t even pick something out and ask you to clarify because I don’t understand any of it. I don’t even understand the title.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 02:40 AM
1

N-count 11 huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 12:34 AM
1

Nah, I am starting a new campaign. Only high n-count and low n-count people get together now, opposites attract. No n-count matching.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/20 12:32 AM
4

I am a higher n-count man, 40-50. I don't think a woman has ever asked, or it's ever been an issue. I've shared the information. My wife is low n-count, I don't remember what she said but it was 5 or less, but I didn't select for it. I don't have any issues due to this. I would say say actually high n-count people should get with low n-count people because opposites attract. There is a lot of n-count match non-sense out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/20 10:20 PM
0

They think that is decent. Doesn’t change that worrying about the collective is blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 03:36 AM
1

Worrying about being a “decent human being” is to be blue pill. So no, it’s impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/20 02:52 AM
1

I mean RP has its origins in black comedians and successful black men. I would say this post is nothing new to people familiar with RP history. RP is just all of that codified for autists.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 06:15 PM
1

I doubt it, it’s not going to be pro-incel or anything it will be shitting on incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 12:30 PM
3

You realize that is a woman right? You don’t seem to have very good intuition. Maybe you should be listening to every word she says, but here you are ignoring your own dumb advice. 🤣😂
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 01:29 PM
2

Yeah that’s fine, the mainstream media will get sick of them too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 01:22 PM
1

That’s fine if it returns to the way it was.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 04:18 AM
2

Yeah, I find it weird that OP is naive enough to not only say listen to women, but then to specifically list groups of women with niche beliefs and some sort of trauma.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 03:49 AM
1

Opposite of what you said is what is actually true in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 03:23 AM
1

I was successful with women and stubborn. Listening to women is one of the worst things you can do as a man, it will make you unhappy and it will make them unhappy. Especially, FDS and feminist types that are less in tune with human nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 03:04 AM
1

OP is full of shit but take it from someone who spent few years on incel subs I was hoping a few people would at least show up to prove my post right lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 04:53 AM
1

So do all men follow TRP advice, or just Chads?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 03:29 AM
1

Who said anything about good? I wouldn't be trying to monetize any of this, but if you already are, I guess you gotta do what you gotta do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 02:56 AM
1

I’ve seen blue pillers that look like pieces of shit, and do alright. I think average women respond to red pill better sure. But, I think it works on certain types of women, or with certain men doing it it might be their best shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 10:53 PM
1

What the right way to remove the veil from the truth is.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 10:51 PM
3

You don’t think BPers can have any success being BP? I don’t think it’s likely a lot of times, but it works for a good portion.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 10:43 PM
2

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 10:42 PM
5

Probably because they want money and that’s the new market.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 10:18 PM
4

Yeah you can have peers in a hierarchy, those are generally who your friends are. Sometimes you take on a mentoring role or a mentee role as well though, and in that case there is a hierarchy. Also, generally people you compete against are who you try to rise above and put below you in a conflict.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 10:01 PM
1

I mean there is something to said about having male companionship in and of itself because women can be a bunch of cunts. But doubly so, because having other male friends, especially ones who are fun, puts you in a better standing with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 09:46 PM
3

These are just very narrow topics that don't cover a lot of anything. It would serve for like, one or two posts. Yet it served for hundreds and hundreds of posts, the mods even made a post flair for it... Women don't really care about what "successful" male behavior looks like except to avoid it bc your "successful" is our "red flag." Again, women can have their opinion and discuss it so you are proving my point. It's a debate about what it is. Issue is they don't differ a lot. The issue is they…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 09:31 PM
3

RP is about men and women, women are discussed. Women are part of the discussion here. That is encompassed by the topics I made.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 09:02 PM
8

I agree, a lot of has to do with male hierarchy. I will say some men do want to help other men who want to be helped, men have been forming alliances and hierarchies for millenia. However, they do not want to help men who cannot be helped and that is what you have in incels and their mentality. I think the weirdest thing about the incels now that I’ve talked to, is that they also have no friends. They don’t care about male companionship. They are entirely focused on women rejecting them, without…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 08:39 PM
1

It was time to come out of retirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 08:20 PM
8

What you described as the "old conversation" in the body and in the bullet points sounds so dull you could record it and use it as psychological torture on war criminals Well you all can find a new place to discuss whatever it is you want to then. Why would anyone besides a small handful of men care about any of this Y'all are determined to drive all female presence away Women have been here arguing since the beginning, you are nothing new and nothing special.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 08:08 PM
9

Well, I personally, being RP leaning, think more are successful while RP. However, I don't think BP is completely incorrect, there are plenty of people who live that lifestyle and have it work for them, but I believe it's less mainstream than originally stated. The OLD point is interesting, it may have opened a door to more lookist type of view. I think the losers in that arena should steer clear however, and try and be successful in other venues. Discussion about it would need to be appropriate…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 08:03 PM
2

It's comments like this that inspired me to write the post. I addressed this point near the end of the post, where I say none of that is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 07:55 PM
8

Yeah, I agree with that. Even back in the day, the MGTOW were a bit divided in how they were treated with the men who were older and divorced vs. the 16 yo kid who has sworn off women forever already.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 07:47 PM
1

Well, it wasn't incel history as much as PPD history, and how it was viewed from the perspective of people here. But yeah, I remember puahate.com and all of that too.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 07:43 PM
6

I guess the difference I am trying to get at is a bit different. RP and BP have lodged a lot of those complaints against each other over the years, but RP and BP don't want each other removed from PPD entirely, that would ruin the fun. However, they both actually want black pill reduced/gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 07:23 PM
8

Like, part of me feels sympathy for in5els. As they are the outcast males and males do not have a "team man" like women do. I get that. I could even understand some supporting arguments for them, just not made by them. I think incel content would be allowed occasionally if incels weren't making it. It often used to happen that way when incels first cropped up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 07:16 PM
16

I think their subs getting banned also had something to do with why they came here to proselytize, but I just want to explain why even a place that discusses gender issues would want to reject it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 07:13 PM
4

When you talked about what doesn't work, it immediately went to looks which is part of the issue. Looks were never an interesting part of the discussion to pretty much anyone. That's why the focus was on game. The insidious 80/20 was another thing that cropped up, that didn't have truth to it the way black pillers described. The there is sort of a motte and bailey that happens with things the 80/20 might be realistic about, and things it definitely is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 07:02 PM
2

Most of the people who have been here a while have been through all the original ideas. It’s kind of hard unless you are trying to an analysis of a gender wars current event. Incels idee fixe allow them to endlessly hammer the same topic forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/20 02:23 PM
1

Why would you want to be with a woman you can’t impress? Sounds miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 04:43 PM
12

Aren’t men polygynous, not hypogamous? Of course loser men are going to complain about being left out or used. However, men aren’t being “hypogamous” by choice, It’s just the easiest way to be with women. Good women can still be successful and stay out of your way, just a lot of women are retards and compete with their men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 03:32 AM
3

Prostitution seems even farther removed then, why can’t people just do what they want? Where does this crazy morality come from?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 03:15 AM
11

Why do the criteria for sleeping with someone and dating them have to be the same? They can just be different and not hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 02:43 AM
0

I’ve said this well before having a daughter. I still don’t know about believe women, but I will believe my daughter.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 02:02 PM
1

Yes, I am intentionally hilarious, I agree. But that doesn’t help your problem of missing your true peak. Actually, I don’t really care about the late bloomers on the subs who don’t become true adults until they are 45 or whatever retardation. It doesn’t change the fact, the peak is in the 20s and everyone else is just coping with the FOMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:53 PM
1

It comes with having peaked better.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:19 PM
1

Yeah, that means the top was cut off, you miss the true peak and artificially peak later.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:17 PM
1

Then you’ve cut off the top of your peak.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:14 PM
0

Plenty of money in your 20s and no one to spend it on but yourself. I mean it’s not take much worse in your 30s but it is a decline, especially if you actually enjoyed your 20s and didn’t just keep everything in its packaging. Definitely less responsibility in your 20s compared to 30s, and you have more power because you aren’t constrained by all the responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:28 AM
0

30s is more constrained, and more stressful if anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:25 AM
2

Yeah, I definitely agree with all of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:24 AM
6

What’s exhibit A? They can use TRP, it might not be optimal for tradcon women, but I’d wager it is probably better than what they were doing previously. I mean if you want that tradcon, you can just go to church.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 02:00 AM
1

I think that’s a disease keeping people down, doesn’t need to be that way though. Society is fucking young people up.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:56 AM
10

You have to get women to like you before you can get married. TRP helps get women to like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:52 AM
1

Yeah, I was secure and I didn’t stress, and I didn’t have to be old to do it. If you did that in your 20s too you would have peaked higher. But really, I don’t care about you, you don’t change humanity as a species.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:46 AM
2

It just means you miss the highest high and have an artificial peak later.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:26 AM
2

Nah, I’m going to enjoy all of it, 20s is still the peak though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:25 AM
2

Sucks to be you then?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 01:21 AM
1

20s is peak youthful vitality, independence, and lack of responsibility
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 12:55 AM
0

Nah, definitely the peak, it’s just a slow decline after that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 12:47 AM
6

Yeah I mean late 20s is still 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 12:46 AM
1

20s is clearly the peak, but it doesn’t have to go downhill fast after that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 12:43 AM
3

I never used condoms unless I was forced, because I didn’t like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/20 03:28 AM
0

Depends how you define many, if you mean most, then no.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 01:51 PM
1

They want guys pining over them and one winning, they don’t want passive acceptance and sharing. Not in this universe anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 01:50 PM
0

Oh, we can conceptualize a world like that, it’s just not this world, with this world’s women. It’s some other alternate bizarro universe.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 03:49 AM
12

They are by definition, impossible to most women, because they wouldn’t like the type of man who would just be in a harem to begin with, making this whole thing unideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 03:47 AM
3

Doubt it, unless you are talking about some odd minority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 03:28 AM
35

Women don’t tend to want that in my experience. They want men competing with other men for them, not just being ok with sharing. Usually the fantasy is some kind of love triangle, not some passive acceptance.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 12:34 AM
1

Not want to, most people can imagine being something else and decide if they would like that or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/20 11:45 PM
4

You can become a tranny if you want to, I’m better off being a man though. I had none of the issues or lack of rights that you all complain about.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 08:18 PM
3

Well many of them do regret it, but they still believe it at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 06:49 PM
3

Yeah, most people don’t want to be the other sex either, but some people are still doing it, and this is a big reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 06:44 PM
2

One being the other what?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 06:42 PM
3

It’s a huge part of the current zeitgeist. Men have trouble with women, so they think it’s easy to be a hot chick, so they try and become that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 05:02 PM
8

I would stay a man. This line of thinking is the crypto-tranny AGP pipeline.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 04:51 PM
1

It’s still a sexual compromise, the people with the most freedoms at the very top have harems, or hop around hypergamously. They only use marriage as a tool to preserve wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 01:39 PM
10

Alpha/Beta is a just a quick and dirty way to get a set of traits that are useful for certain goals. I don’t think your post refutes that. Also I think monogamy is a compromise, not an ideal state for either sex. As far as intelligence goes, it’s the same as it’s always been IMO, the traits that women select for showing wit and capability are still what is used, panties don’t get moist talking about algorithms and physics.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 12:03 AM
1

It’s response to you saying different things are the same thing when they aren’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 05:55 PM
1

No, it’s called an analog. They are different because they are criticized for doing different things, and the different things have different names.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 05:54 PM
3

No pickmes are just pickmes. Simps are just simps.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 02:10 PM
7

They usually undervalue themselves, either way, that’s still a pickme when it’s a woman, not a simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 05:18 AM
25

Women aren’t simps, they are pickmes, and this isn’t something men criticize because it benefits them. Just like women don’t care about simps. It’s not a double standard because men and women are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/20 05:10 AM
3

I didn’t make a post, I’m assuming this is a miscomment?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 09:11 PM
9

Right, but it doesn’t help for the men. They are still going to hear all that. That’s why the advice is: don’t listen to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 09:08 PM
12

Actually, the issue is listening to women in general. Women complain everywhere, even in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 09:04 PM
3

I don't know, why is everyone paying for streaming services now when we used to pirate shit for free? Why is everyone paying for bottled water?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/20 04:44 PM
1

Nothing in the comment you just made follows from what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 01:09 AM
2

That’s just repeating the second condition I stated, so it is in fact the reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 06:31 PM
1

I doubt they would be able to handle staying with them through the disgust in the first place, but I guess I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 06:29 PM
2

How? Not everyone can find what they want, or want to be ultimately unhappy because their partner has imperfections. What you are saying is essentially encouraging incels types to continue being picky and always be lonely and never happy, so I definitely do not agree with that, they are annoying enough as it is and don’t need encouragement.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 05:01 PM
3

It’s a hot take, I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 01:29 PM
2

I don’t know, that depends on the individual and the item. It doesn’t mean that isn’t what they most desire, even if they settle for something else. Even a person of means may choose to be savvy and settle for other reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 01:26 PM
0

Do you think I am surprised, or that I even care what women want? The fraction of a sentence you quoted was a response I made to someone else using an assumption they made.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 01:23 PM
3

Probably, but a new German product would still be preferred to a used German one in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 10:24 AM
5

If hypergamy can’t be stopped, she can still leave him for someone better regardless of n count.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/20 03:10 AM
54

I mean it’s probably a mix of both. If women are objects, you are going to want a shiny new object, not a used object. If women have stupid annoying brains of their own, you aren’t going to want them to make comparisons to you if you aren’t the greatest.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 08:51 PM
1

I guess I agree, why not? The phrasing just sounds weird to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 04:53 PM
1

Those don’t seem like exclusive options. You could sequentially hop from dick to dick and then lie about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 04:50 PM
2

I still don’t understand the difference between linearly and deliberately here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 04:36 PM
1

Well liberal feminists believe degrading sex is empowering so that is fun. And a lot of women lose their convictions for partners. So I guess I’m fine with hooking up and dating them. Mate value probably depends mostly on other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 03:45 AM
1

It’s not the same cognate when men have casual sex. Generally, men who simp are the ones who are seen as chumps not valuing themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/20 01:57 AM
2

Is this a blog post or a debate topic?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 08:28 PM
1

That the access to porn and prostitutes affects men similarly. If you think men have changed with the access to porn, women have changed similarly with access to social media. I don’t care if it causes a problem for anyone, I’m not them or their parents. I’m just saying it’s caused them to change in a similar enabling/indulgent way.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 05:56 PM
7

It sounds like you have just tried to redefine alpha as a selfish introvert and that betas need to be less extro and more intro to be selfish. I mean that’s false, if they want to be more successful, they need to be more extro and selfishness is not really correlated with extroversion/introversion.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 04:18 PM
1

I took a break from PPD for over a year, but I’ve been in the community for about 8 years. None of this lookist insanity has ever been RP. Even with RP lifting, you lift so that you aren’t a faggot, not so that you become a faggot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 01:46 PM
1

Nah, black pill says looks matter. Red pill is just game and sexism. You are clearly black pill/blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 01:33 PM
1

So you are just spouting black pill nonsense then, not red pill at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 01:26 PM
2

I’m saying ugly people are irrelevant and if you are talking about them you are missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 01:16 PM
2

Looks are not relevant to the point, it’s just black pill shoehorning their idee fixe in.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 01:14 PM
0

9-1 and then I would say break up with them, but I’d probably just ghost cause she terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 12:53 PM
1

I guess I’ve always just chose to live my life in the >90% so accepting it isn’t an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 12:49 PM
2

And this is about being an introvert, only the non-RP black pillers keep coming in here and saying it’s about looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 12:34 PM
2

Because it never has been, that’s just black pill retardation. Most people are average, not ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 12:33 PM
1

If you are seeing them all the time, then you are tripping.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 12:32 PM
1

It’s not the same, it’s still amplified. It would be like comparing porn to hookers, and saying the same thing, but that’s just as retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 12:30 PM
1

Maybe looks matter. Just not in this case. Introversion matters more.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 04:13 AM
0

It is though, looks aren’t even the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 04:12 AM
1

No way, most intros are average. I rarely see ugly intro people.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 04:11 AM
2

But given that they are both averagely physically attractive like most people, extros don’t have the issue, intros do.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 01:58 AM
2

More red pill than most people here will ever be.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 01:46 AM
2

Not blue pill, worrying about looks is black pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 01:46 AM
0

No the introness is unattractive, they aren’t physically unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 01:45 AM
5

It’s more the other way around, getting followers and likes makes her unhappy with average men who she is actually a match for.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 06:55 PM
1

I’ll have to meet her before I can make my judgement on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 02:21 PM
1

First, it’s risk averse. Are you saying that dudes aren’t getting married and we won’t have firefighters as men become more risk averse? I mean, that isn’t a point that supports your view, it’s a corollary if what you say is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 02:19 PM
2

She could just be annoying, plenty of women are annoying.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 02:13 PM
2

People say this, but it sounds more like lip service and idealism.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 01:52 PM
3

I’m not really RP like that, but people kept changing my flair and I don’t care anymore. I don’t think looks matter that much. Average extro gets laid easily, average intro struggles or is incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 01:47 PM
4

They are unattractive, but not physically unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 01:43 PM
2

I don’t know how they were born however it’s not really relevant, it’s the introversion that’s unattractive. Maybe they can CBT themselves into extro, I don’t know. But they are being increasingly enabled currently.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 01:34 PM
6

It’s the same thing, socially retarded people are unattractive. They don’t even need to be ugly and most aren’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 01:32 PM
5

I agree, and dudes find all the extro stacies attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 01:31 PM
6

No. Being an introvert is unattractive. People like extros more.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 01:30 PM
5

It’s the other way around, introverts are unattractive because they are introverts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 01:26 PM
11

I think it’s more that people are increasingly able to indulge in being introverts due to technology. Extros will be fine, intros will continue to struggle more.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/20 01:20 PM
1

And here is a a piece about Stanton, who was one of the icons in all of this: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/09/28/elizabeth-cady-stanton An abolitionist more out of political convenience than conviction, she not only abandoned the movement for black male suffrage after the Civil War to focus on white women’s suffrage There are plenty of examples of how she did this. This is one of the people you mentioned, she is not some no name side figure. Edit: I’m sure not all were this way, and e…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 01:08 PM
0

Nah looks don’t matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 12:57 PM
1

It seems more part of a boogeyman to BPers, then an actual critique of sexism in black culture. They didn’t even know where it came from, I think most actually attributed it to some sci-Fi show or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 12:56 PM
1

I’m not sure what views need to be changed here. These are facts. It’s odd that you would try and pretend like it didn’t happen, where as most tend to say the ideology is different now and more intersectional.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 03:36 AM
1

I’m using words that BP uses. You trying to change the argument doesn’t change their elitist racism.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 03:25 AM
1

It’s not a joke. The mods change my flair on me. I haven’t touched it in a long time.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 03:24 AM
3

This sounds like a whitewashed version of history. There are plenty of examples of the racism of the suffragettes. And the founder of planned parenthood Margaret Sanger, wrote a book called “women and the new race”, she was a eugenicist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 01:27 AM
2

If you think that everyone who uses that term are misogynist losers and validate you beliefs because you think the people are of a certain identity worthy of disdain, then your criticism is the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 01:15 AM
1

I believe racial posts are banned here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 01:11 AM
1

Probably changed against my will, without my consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/20 01:10 AM
1

I agree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 11:35 PM
3

I don’t know about black women generally, but black feminists sure. However, feminism is a white peopleism. It was started as suffragettes so that white women could counter the black vote, and they started planned parenthood to help control the black population. But allowing feminism to exist is just another evidence of prosperity. The fact that there are black feminists is a good sign for them. Although, I’m not sure it’s as widespread as it is for white people. White women are at a near hyster…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 11:13 PM
5

Another example would be the whole concept of treating people like individuals because they can be completely self-actualized when freed from natural constraints due to prosperity. And then normalizing that while looking down on people who fall into more gendered or less unique roles. This is a cultural view even if some individuals make it. Sometimes BPers will counter with “people can have gender roles if they want to”, but that there shows the disconnect, there is no “if you want to”. That’s …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 08:23 PM
4

It’s called an example. There are plenty of others, but from the sounds of it, listing them would be a waste of time on your ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 07:56 PM
3

I did in another comment. But basically a lot of RP in the beginning came from black culture/comedians. As for the enjoy the decline part, I am married and starting a family, so I’m not as interested in the bachelor life of spinning plates forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 07:45 PM
9

As far as bettering yourself physically, yeah it takes money but both sides tend to agree that that is an improvement. What I mean is more that a lot of RPisms in the beginning came from black comedians. I actually enjoyed it then. I remember BPers used to get so mad that RPers called women “females”, and attributed it to them being loser nerd autists who were being scientific and misogynist (and oddly enough saying RPers were a bunch of white racists). In reality, that term came from black cult…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 07:43 PM
14

Yes, it’s just elitist white peopleism, thinking they are better than poor people and brown people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 07:25 PM
19

I am not white enough to be blue pill, but red pill is too autistic and enjoy the decline.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 07:08 PM
2

I’m not sure if there is an instinct for it though. There is a “I will be rationale and do this, despite my instincts”.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 07:06 PM
2

Marriage is a construct, a guy can have multiple wives, a guy can have a wife and a harem and it not be considering cheating if he indulges. In fact the ones with the most power and freedom to do what they want do that sort of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 06:37 PM
3

That doesn’t mean monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 06:34 PM
1

The last word
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 06:33 PM
2

Do you know what instinctively means? You used the word.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 06:32 PM
1

The last word
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 06:31 PM
2

They don’t instinctively do it in mass.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 06:30 PM
1

Typical woman...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 06:29 PM
4

How do you make the stretch from “no sluts” to monogamous commitment? The men who have the power to, have harems and as many women as they can horde.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 06:23 PM
1

Then show me you are capable of insight, because so far you have been unable to.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 06:13 PM
2

I got a STEM degree from a liberal arts college and I make bank now, and I got laid like tile while I was there. You don’t need to go to an Institute of technology to get a STEM degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 03:57 PM
2

Large liberal arts and state colleges tend to be good. For a lot of them the city/town forms about the college, but yeah I imagine it would be different if it is in the middle of a metropolitan city center.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 03:41 PM
4

What? If you go to college, you can bang all the hot, young coeds you want. The older men can’t compete because they aren’t there. Why waste time getting with old hags?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 01:52 PM
1

It does, but unfortunately, it will still be lost on you it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 12:48 PM
1

There is no Christian RP, that’s just a bunch of faggot LARPers. This is what I mean. Blue pill is cryptochristianity if not outright Christian.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 06:02 AM
5

shamefur dispray
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 05:17 AM
1

That’s a retarded take on what RP is, maybe you should try and learn more first. My wife is fine, but she feels bad for you and your ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 04:13 AM
1

I’ve had quite a few partners, never wanted to fuck my mom. Regardless, I’m married now and RP generalizations still hold. I don’t know much about FDS but I’m sure it works for them too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 02:58 AM
1

Not if you are trying to have sex with them, then they are all the same. Unless you are trying to have sex with your mom, that’s not shit I’m into.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/20 02:54 AM
1

No, I wouldn’t try and game my mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 10:57 PM
1

Wrong. There are not enough variations to matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 10:48 PM
6

Most people aren't individuals. They are more like a hivemind than anything else. It's a feature, not a bug.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/20 12:16 AM
1

So put yourself in the 20 at the time. Life doesn’t hand out participation trophies, everything is a competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 12:26 PM
2

They might not get a gf or married or anything, it’s still on them to change it if they want to. I think most of the ones who can’t get a sniff don’t want to do what it takes to fix it anyway. I don’t really care about female incels or whatever either, I’m not “society”.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 02:32 AM
1

Good, how have you been?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 12:40 AM
20

Somewhere between 2 and 4. Not really a big deal if some dudes can’t get laid, but I doubt some are willing to make the changes necessary to fix it. It’s on them if they want to fix it though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 12:30 AM
3

I mean according to the law it’s abuse, and I probably wouldn’t take it lightly personally, but people get mad, even women, so I understand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/20 01:25 AM
3

Yeah, I wouldn’t be super concerned if she tried to hit me. But even if you upped the ante, I’d probably take like a non-fatal gunshot or stabbing over cheating. This is for marriage though, not bf/gf.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/20 01:17 AM
1

Cheating is worse, I’d rather have her hit me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/20 01:12 AM
2

Chads are still having more children that survive to have more children. Betas do not, they just get cucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/20 05:43 PM
1

I don’t think it’s super common outside of lower class. However, many here are lower class. And even if it’s uncommon, it’s still an unpleasant thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/20 06:52 PM
12

I was here since about 7 years ago, it was mostly BPers telling RPers they were rapists and that RP wasn’t science. Last Minute Resistance (LMR) and the fact that RP wasn’t in a scientific journal was most of the discussion. BP always claimed to not have a position, just “not RP”. However, that was de facto not correct. Also at the very beginning not all the current RP theory was there, like I remember when “anger stage” post first happened, so in a way there was new discussion happening because…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/20 03:02 PM
2

I would clone myself and with my clone army fight someone else’s clone army. Turn off pain if you need to. FPS IRL
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/20 06:14 PM
5

Blowjob, serving someone and not doing something for mutual pleasure is more intimate.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/20 08:20 PM
1

I was thinking that would be cool, he’d probably still jump out though.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 10:26 PM
1

I didn’t realize I was even getting mentions. I’ll take you for a ride, although Tank is salty no mention.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 09:57 PM
1

Too late, I’m only sharing my coconuts with my island crew.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 09:43 PM
2

Eating people is for the winter when you can’t find food. I don’t acknowledge islands that aren’t tropical.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 09:01 PM
4

We are going to THRIVE.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 08:58 PM
1

Nah, rape is fine. Especially chill rape, it’s pretty chill.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/18 04:46 PM
1

Nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/18 02:32 PM
1

It’s times where you have sex but the girl forgot to say no or something. It’s not that bad, they will remember next time, maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/18 12:16 AM
1

My flair was permabanned while king dipshit was in charge, i have been granted access again since the new leadership with stipulations.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 08:55 PM
5

I noticed, and I sprayed upvotes your direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 08:41 PM
0

Female solipsism.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/18 12:55 AM
3

Yeah garbage mod, play wit dem titties for me bb.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/18 12:04 PM
4

Shut up slut, no one asked you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/18 11:58 AM
1

Because you mods lie and make shit up like when I was banned for “reporting a bunch of comments.”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 09:34 PM
6

Yes, make me mod, I will delete it for you incompetent woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 09:09 PM
8

This subreddit is still garbage, delete it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 07:44 PM
1

I raped her and by law in my country she had to marry me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 06:37 PM
3

They don’t, male responses tend get them banned or it’s deleted in the women’s favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/18 07:52 PM
5

this is my new favorite post ever
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/18 10:32 PM
2

They met on the pic swapping thread I believe. So non-lookists BTFO. I wouldn’t have said their views aligned before they met, but they certainly get along now.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/18 01:26 PM
2

I know one too, and I thought it would be the same. But they never shut up about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/18 01:18 PM
3

if you think a prominent feminist who wrote an essay making reasoned arguments with feminist premises (which others have done as well) is analogous to saying “pizza is feminism” on Twitter you may be ODing on pomo.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/18 04:03 PM
1

Yeah like some sort of rotation. I agree with that too.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/18 05:50 PM
1

Yeah, that I would agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/18 01:06 AM
2

80 patients all at the same time on a spaceship with 1 doctor? You must want to kill women and children. It might actually be worse for the colony then 20/80 without pre-pregnancies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/18 10:49 PM
1

But even still there is a discrepancy, it was shown in other studies from meat space. So it's not like it's wrong in a sexual free market.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/18 09:45 PM
2

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/18 09:29 PM
3

You are going to send 80 pregnant women on a spaceship? I feel like you would want to be staggering the pregnancies so they can function and help. It seems like having 20 men taking care of 80 pregnant women would not work out that well especially if they aren't all doctors.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/18 09:28 PM
5

Except for the lost genetic diversity on the male side. Just make rules and mandate a 1 to 1 pairing like the patriarchy originally intended.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/18 08:58 PM
1

Send her to prison if she can’t pay for it herself, maybe they can have some sort of labor camp with all the other women who decided to do that and they can help each other. That or she can get an abortion. Her body, her decision, her responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/18 04:34 AM
1

I’m saying she shouldn’t be allowed to choose something that puts her on that path.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/18 04:25 AM
1

Or the woman, it sounds like she shouldn’t have a choice in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/18 04:11 AM
1

If they were both the same page the kid wouldn't be happening anyway. The problem is if you ask the man "do you consent to being a father?" he says no, and if you ask the woman "do you consent to being a mother?", she is having the baby and forcing him to pay for it without his consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/18 12:19 AM
0

Why does it matter whether it's her body? The money is the man's and it's coercion all the same for the same purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/18 12:06 AM
0

I’m not concerned with the legality, just the moral aspect.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/18 11:38 PM
-1

Do you blame women for sexual assault? It's their fault if they wind up at a man's house alone and drunk, they knew the possibility of sex could happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/18 11:13 PM
5

You understand RP less than terpers understand feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 01:45 PM
1

I never said that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 01:11 AM
11

I too like to think of Redpillville as a meth zone.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 12:13 AM
3

Not all women have vaginas shitlord.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/18 03:27 PM
1

Nick Foles is a Thundercock.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/18 05:20 AM
1

Probably when a competing subreddit was formed that can't be mentioned on here or the comments get removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 04:41 PM
1

Apparently everything is a PPD post again these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 04:34 PM
1

Wtf did you wait so long dummy?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/18 09:07 PM
7

This isn’t specific enough, the man shouldn’t be a main character important to the plot or her survival. She should save him just because. Actually it doesn’t even need to be a woman doing it, just bros saving bros.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/18 07:37 PM
2

Doesn’t make being a soyboy any less disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/18 06:48 PM
8

The amount of butthurt and sensitivity one must have to call this post EXTREMELY BIASED is hilarious. Let alone to say so on a debate subreddit. The cherry on top was that you quoted the content of the memo as evidence of bias, when it wasn't even made by OP. This just shows you have absolutely no clue what the fuck you are talking about lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 09:48 PM
7

Yet its still better than all your statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 09:40 PM
8

Your head is so far up your ass, I don't think you know what an unbiased opinion is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 09:34 PM
2

Yeah, fag mods keep deleting my flair. They don’t have time to mod the sub because they “do it for free”. Yet they have time to constantly micromanage my flair.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 06:00 PM
1

Are you supposed to read that thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 04:36 PM
1

I apologize on behalf of Team Red for not bringing you the gina tingles you so desire. I will take corrective action immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 04:34 PM
4

Yeah its true, I wish they would toughen up. It's a bad look. God damn where is all that A&A and amused mastery when it's needed?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 04:23 PM
1

Many BPers are too dumb to understand what is going on, but they feel themselves being beaten on an emotional level, so they get angry and fling shit regardless of whether it makes sense in an effort to stop it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 04:06 PM
1

That's the soundness of the argument. A logical argument can still be unsound.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 05:04 AM
2

hyper isn't red, ppd_frameenforcer is
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/18 02:27 PM
0

Some are for sure, but overall it's still probably more normal than TBP. It's like TBP looks at TRP and goes "hold my beer...". Only with something much less normal than beer.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 10:32 PM
2

You will probably find many of them are white people on some kind of medication.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 10:25 PM
1

I believe the gold plated shitter was actually liberal fake news, it was actually a hotel he stayed at in some other country.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/18 11:54 PM
2

It's the pats again though now.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/18 02:39 AM
3

Go after all women. No need to limit to any specific type.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/18 02:56 AM
1

When real reds keep it real here, the mods just delete your comments and ban you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/18 02:35 AM
4

I would say taking someone else's feelings in to account by attempting to let them down gently is the exact opposite of Solipsism. Not really. Some people are better off having people be blunt and would prefer that. Assuming they want you to be considerate and feminine towards them because that's what you would like is an aspect of solipsism.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 11:11 PM
0

We can take it back. Takes the piss out of any word.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/18 02:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter