It seems like it is the men who cannot get laid or get a relationship that think they are the most knowledgeable about women. This is a bizarre blue pillism where they believe those on the bottom should have superiority similar to how those who are the most oppressed are considered the most moral. This seems obviously backwards from reality anyway, where the men who fail, fail precisely because they don’t understand women or how the world works.

They tend to perform another blue pillism in needing sources and studies to justify their beliefs. However the studies are less relevant as to why individuals succeed to or do not succeed than anecdata, which often highlights the multivariate nature of human interaction.

Most people would not trust a salesman who cannot make sales to be correct about how to sell. When pressed on the issue, if the poor performing salesman provided economic data to explain why he is bad at sales, it would continue to look dumb as it still doesn’t explain why he never made a sale (while he continues to state that he knows everything about sales of course).

So why would we trust the poor performing salesman on why he is correct about sales? Similarly why would we believe the men who can’t get women on what it takes to get women, especially when their reasoning flies in the face of what is seen as correct by most, especially the ones who are successful? It seems the ones who fail are the ones who aren’t aware and/or coping.