TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

fengpi Archive

View 8 posts and 9,359 comments by fengpi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 9,359 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Most predators are men, and it is proven. It doesn't mean that all men are predatory. Women understand this, we don't fear every man we come across. This reasonable sentiment of yours is not common enough, unfortunately. You asked a fair question: What rights? You deserve a fair answer (sorry for the delay, I have RL to deal with)... when someone is accused of a crime, they ought to have a presumption of innocence. This is a fundamental principle of jurisprudence. If I accuse you of murdering so…
/r/MensRights11/05/24 02:05 PM
6

Additionally, if you recall the endless haranguing about "rape culture," when men think they have to make the first move, that's supposedly a factor which opens the door to all kinds of abusive and fearful behavior. Oddly, we now see that ladies seem to prefer this ingredient of rape culture.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 01:52 PM
2

"I am a feminist, but only to a certain extent." Only to the extent that you find it personally convenient, of course. Me, I'm a vegetarian but I eat meat whenever I feel like it.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 05:19 AM
4

Earlier today, I was thinking about how dumb the reactions are to this hypothetical question. Many people fail to gauge risks correctly. It's a routine feature of human cognition. There are people who are afraid to get onto aircraft but will not hesitate to get into a car. Statistically speaking, you are far more likely to die in a car. Sharks are scary to most people, but the number of people who are killed by sharks each year is miniscule. In contrast, hippos kill more people than sharks each …
/r/MensRights07/05/24 09:53 AM
19

There are multiple problems with the idea. And you'll note that the 'pink tax' runs against another portion of their schtick: That society-wide misogyny means that all things feminine are *valued less* while all things masculine are *valued more.* If I were to make a statement like that in a feminist space, I don't think anybody would contradict me. But it would also follow that a "masculine" product would need to fetch a premium price compared to its pink equivalent. In fact, to have a pink equ…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 03:03 AM
1

I don't really know enough about the situation to criticize the point that you're making.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 10:56 PM
5

Some of the root assumptions are just weird. In this worldview, the basic impetus that drives people is "power" (however defined). And "acquiring power" is apparently THE most important thing. It determines EVERY bloody other aspect of human relations. And one sex is completely brilliant at acquiring power, but the other sex is pathetically hopeless at it. Really? Is ANY of that remotely true? They took the tenets of Marxism, crossed-out "capitalist" and wrote "men", crossed-out "labor" and wrot…
/r/MensRights07/03/24 01:56 PM
6

Look, you don't deserve any abuse for what you wrote here. But here's the thing... ...the philosophical background from which these theories came is not exactly settled science. It is a product of certain (fashionable) intellectual currents that existed in certain places and times. Rather revealingly, the first women's studies departments-- the academic wing of the feminist movement-- came out of literary studies departments instead of any sort of sociology or political science departments. The …
/r/MensRights07/03/24 07:41 AM
3

Yeah, that's funny. But (for me) there's one glaring omission: the woman in that video seems to work some kind of job, but it's never mentioned anywhere that she's been sharing any of the expenses in the household. That's a critical question, because if you're not helping with the mutual expenses and not willing to do housework, then you're just a squatter. Given the fact that she can pack up and move out so quickly suggests that her name isn't on the utilities or the housing document.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 12:32 PM
1

Sorry, what do you mean that "they" insist on stereotypical gender roles? Trans people?
/r/MensRights05/03/24 12:25 PM
23

*Why are we sitting in a home with electricity then?* Because feminists don't know (or particularly care) where electricity come from. Or running water. But they *do* know why their garbage bag disappears from the curbside once a week: Magic, invisible elves.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 12:23 AM
130

There were some women working on the Manhattan project, but as the author concedes the movie is called 'Oppenheimer', so it's unsurprising that it focuses on the man and most of the other big players. Or, to give another example, "Citizen Kane" doesn't focus on how Susan is such a totally awesome opera singer.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 08:19 AM
116

And the thing is that Oppenheimer is not different to most films. Because most films are anti-women. ...there it is, the stupidest thing I've seen all week. Because if you're going to say that "most films are anti-women", you will also need to say equally nonsensical things like "most books are anti-women", "most theatrical productions are anti-women," "most music is anti-women" and "most of real life is anti-women." No. But you can and should expect such a film to accurately and fairly represen…
/r/MensRights09/01/24 07:33 AM
1

Absolutely. Social media is cancer.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 11:09 PM
-3

Russia is winning. Israel is doing crimes. Trump is being jailed. The first two sound lousy, but that third one sounds like wonderful news. ;)
/r/MensRights16/11/23 11:00 PM
1

You're going to throw-away your dental floss now, right? Because you'd be a hypocrite if you didn't.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 03:55 AM
11

That study was from 2008, which was 15 years ago. More recent information can be had. The CDC and the Guttmacher Institute, for instance, have a lot of items. There are no scientific studies proving that kids who get sexual education at school have less teen pregnancies than kids who don't have any sexual education at all. Shockingly, I don't think a scientific study is really necessary to close the book on that question. Nor do I necessarily need a German rocket engineer to present me with a Ph…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 12:28 PM
47

I like how they can't legally forbid men from showing-up, so they have to order men to comply with women's wishes. Thus, they must pretend to comply with the law while ignoring it. It really is revealing how so much of women's fist-pumping, self-congratulating activism could not exist without a giant helping of obliging male gallantry. "Yes yes, girl-power. May I take your coat, madam?"
/r/MensRights06/10/23 12:39 AM
4

if I didn't know how to approach and date and have sex without it being rape, then I'd be better off just raping someone and going to prison. That is beyond screwy. How does approaching someone make them a rapist?
/r/MensRights20/09/23 07:13 AM
1

Narcissists are very hard to work with. It takes years before they're willing to concede that they might-- MIGHT-- have a problem. Other people aren't really people to them. Other people are things that exist to follow orders and not talk back.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 03:59 AM
2

Here's the funny thing: when I meet a feminist from a country like Pakistan or Kenya, I typically get along with them really well. It's the ones in the industrialized countries who tend to be nutcases.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 03:58 AM
2

I prefer to shorten it to: "the difference between Radfems and Modfems is a disagreement over men being irredeemably evil or just redeemably evil."
/r/MensRights18/09/23 03:54 AM
53

This woman sounds like she has a legitimate personality disorder and needs psychiatric help. This might be a good starting point, but I am not a professional. The fact that she calls herself a feminist is not surprising. It is a political ideology which perfectly suits female narcissists, a scholarly-looking "the world is crazy, not me" reassurance.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 03:44 AM
9

Where are these alternatives? Constant apology. Self-flagellation. Bowing & begging forgiveness from your moral betters. 200 delicious varieties of shame. And crying. Lots and lots and lots of goddamned crying while being simultaneously mocked for the crying. And the mocking will be from the very same people who'd encouraged you to start crying in the first place. Because, despite all the "it's OK for men to cry!" jawboning, they find it uncontrollably disgusting. What emotionally-healthy male w…
/r/MensRights28/07/23 12:47 PM
1

It goes against the objectives of study. You can figure out what those are.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 07:38 AM
3

They blinded me with science! Political science!
/r/MensRights16/05/23 07:35 AM
47

Isn’t history just facts that happened? If there's one thing I have learned, it's that you need to be careful when defining the word "history" and it's a lot more than "facts that happened." I will quote the British academic Arthur Marwick's definition, because I think it's comprehensive: “The bodies of knowledge about the past produced by historians, together with everything that is involved in the production, communication of, and teaching about that knowledge.” (2001) So it's not just about w…
/r/MensRights15/05/23 09:35 AM
25

The lying, mainly. The non-stop lying and tendentious conclusion-reaching. The bad ethics, the dishonesty by omission, the tendency to argue like greasy defense attorneys. The Duke rape hoax of 2006 very sharply exposed the illiberal presumption of guilt which exists at the very core of feminism. The movement's idea of jurisprudence is a recipe for injustice. They all complain that the way rape cases are tried is wholly inadequate, so I asked "what would a feminist-approved rape trial look like?…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 10:29 PM
163

They were badly disappointed. Since the world is rife with misogyny coming from men and men alone-- as everybody knows-- the study was flawed insofar that it didn't support the pre-expected conclusion. The statement "We are not pointing at women and saying they are misogynists" really does give the game away, doesn't it. To my eyes, the defensiveness suggests an intent.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 03:00 AM
2

I saw the trailer and had no desire to see the film. I can't judge what I haven't seen, but a few items that give me a dim view of the notion: So the chick goes-out, pretends to be drunk, and that's her way to entrap and confront seemingly-docile rapists who are lurking around every corner. Dozens of times. So what's the logical takeaway from that? You can protect yourself from rapists by being in a group, not getting blind stinking drunk and otherwise being street-smart? NO, no no... ...rapists…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:29 AM
137

"We don't want the research to be seen as vilifying women. That goes against objectives of study. We are not pointing at women and saying they are misogynists," Crook said. Oh thank God for that! What do you suppose the reaction would be if the results were as lopsided as a feminist might expect? Crook also believes that campaigns designed to encourage gender equality should address both men and women, not just men. They already do, chum. Men: "STOP BEING FUCKING MISOGYNISTS!" Women: "Accuse men…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:09 AM
4

It's an especially senseless and grotesque case. It's shocking and upsetting, even by today's standards.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 09:23 AM
4

White lady privilege.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 09:22 AM
0

First of all, even if you hadn't considered suicide, it's always healthy to talk things over with someone who is qualified to help you. This next bit is probably going to come-off sounding pretty useless and insipid, but I'm going to say it anyway. At some point in the future, you're going to get a different perspective and remember the people around you at age 15. And you'll be amazed by how incredibly idiotic they are going to sound in your memory. Because they were. Sometimes, the most popula…
/r/MensRights22/03/23 01:20 PM
5

Well some standards must be had. I met a rich Saudi dude (in a bar with a girl on each arm) who claimed to be a virgin because none of the women he'd screwed had been Saudi.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 01:35 AM
24

She's 16, still a kid. Some girls grow out of it. The ones that don't, turn into feminists. If it makes you feel better, I had a similarly bizarre argument around that age. I think it was in April, 1992-- MTV's 'Spring Break' had a thing taking place at some resort at Lake Havasu. I happened to be watching it and they had two swimsuit contests. One was for women, and it was immediately followed by one for men where they had these beefcake-looking dudes strutting around. There might've been a com…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 01:29 AM
5

I hear you. The feminist misunderstandings are often systemic because they start from faulty presuppositions and rely upon lazy assumptions. If men and women receive different earnings "for the same job", it must be due to dark and sinister forces and not because they tend to do "the same job" in significantly different ways. If boys and girls play with different toys, it's because "they are given" different toys and not because they have any tendencies towards preferences of their own. And so o…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 01:18 AM
14

Their view has a great deal to do with the ideological roots of feminism. The line of thinking goes back to Engels and (before him) Rousseau. Humans are born a blank slate and turn-out a certain way by socialization. Scientific evidence doesn't matter: to claim that an inequality is "natural" is to justify inequality. Such women sense their own sex drive, see a different form of sex drive in men, and conclude that the difference is made-up by something dark and sinister.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 12:17 AM
12

And the big feminist organizations nonetheless doubled-down and continued to back an obvious and malicious liar.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 11:46 AM
7

I saw a very edifying youtube video about the accusations against Manson made by people into the kind of kink where they like being tied up and whipped and so on. I know nothing about that lifestyle, so I was looking to educate myself about why they were suspicious about the accusations. I guess Manson had been accused of tying someone up and torturing them; the accuser made all kinds of claims of injury, but didn't mention nerve damage. According to the folks who were speaking about it, that se…
/r/MensRights25/02/23 11:44 AM
7

Here's what you do: You point-out an instance where there's a university department or field with a lack of men. Speech therapy or elementary education, for instance. Then, you advocate affirmative action for men. That's when the feminists squeal like stuck piggies about the discrimination, even though it's simply a consistent application of their own logic to areas they don't wish to acknowledge. They understand perfectly well it's a form of discrimination, but in their value system it's unfair…
/r/MensRights08/11/22 12:21 AM
2

I tend to assume most think that they are lying for the greater good, but some things about that don't add up to me so who the hell knows. "Noble lies," Plato called them. Contradictions don't matter if the cause is served. There is no such thing as a male or a female brain, except transgender folks absolutely possess such brains in the wrong bodies. Take your pick.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 02:00 PM
3

There are multiple factors and you have mentioned a major one, yes. The Sears Roebuck corporation, back when they existed, underwent a major investigation from a US government agency in the 1980s to determine why their female sales managers were making less than their male sales managers. It took about 2 years. They determined that the main cause was that male and female salespeople gravitate towards risky commission-based or less risky non-commission-based sales positions. So I guess the soluti…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:46 PM
2

Feminism is making the assertion that a skilled machinist with 20 years of experience should be paid the same as a freshly-hired machinist who joined the firm yesterday. They're both doing "the same work" after all!
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:29 PM
78

Personally, I would have said: "since there is so much evidence showing that the feminist 'wage gap' is not primarily caused by discrimination, those who continue to push the story are doing so out of mendacity rather than because of a good faith error."
/r/MensRights29/10/22 01:26 PM
33

I think she's basically saying that empirical evidence is unnecessary when feminism is so good.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 12:47 PM
26

"Gender studies" is an academic program to produce politically-programmed cadres. You can't get a degree in that subject if you believe that abortion is murder, for instance. You are correct that econometrics and economic studies going back many years (including a meta-analysis of the Dept of Labor, which had the inconvenient document removed from their website back in 2009) have shown the wage gap to be a function of the various choices and trade-offs that women make (among them: having babies,…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 12:41 PM
39

I came to this realization after going on a date with a conventionally unattractive but very nice woman who identifies strongly as a radical feminist, and while we were hanging out and casually watching TV she told me several times how she hates men, while simultaneously actively seeking my sexual and emotional attention She doesn't really see you as a man. She thinks you're a woman with a penis. Until you disappoint her in some way, and then you're just as bad as the rest.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 01:23 AM
13

I mean "skills deficits?" Like what? I had an ex-girlfriend once who couldn't read a road map, balance a checkbook, hold-down a job or handle the minor, day-to-day problems that pop-up in a regular week. She couldn't do "adulting," if that's a word. This article would have made her feel much better about herself.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 11:29 PM
2

I don't think you really get the point. How is your use of "patriarchy" different from "stuff about I don't like about society"? the black and white fallacy. Offering examples of something as an illustration is not a fallacy. And if you're judging ancient Rome by some kind of modern, progressive moral standard, then you're demanding far too much from the past.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 11:03 PM
22

I think the way that feminists use the term "patriarchy" is useless. It basically means "stuff about I don't like about society." I know that's not how they define it, but they use it in so many different contexts to mean so many different things that their definition basically means nothing. So I were to take 4 different kinds of families in different societies: a Roman Republic family, a contemporary Korean family, a Victorian-era English family and a 1650s Iroquois family, there are many thin…
/r/MensRights17/10/22 12:17 PM
39

you just let it happen I felt the same way after reading Constance Wu's rape story. A dude she was dating, she went up into his apartment. They were making out, he's like: "let's have sex," she said "no." Then he went to get a condom, he came back, and they had sex. And that was a rape because she said "no". There was no force, no threats and she could have said "no" again, but she didn't. Presumably her clothes vanished off of her body and she was superglued to the couch. She didn't realize she…
/r/MensRights09/10/22 11:24 PM
2

The least she could do was clean your place and have fresh, hot food ready for you, every morning and evening. "Sexism!!11!"
/r/MensRights27/09/22 07:13 AM
8

I knew she needed time to get a job and I gave her a grace period of several months before turning-up the pressure. Not having a job sucks and pestering someone about being unemployed certainly doesn't help, so i kept my mouth shut during what I'd assumed would be a very temporary period. I offered job-hunting assistance and I pointed out job openings to her when I saw them, but she didn't want those jobs. I did kick her out eventually. At that point, she went around telling everyone that I was …
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:49 PM
89

The concept of "emotional labor" was coined by a sociologist, Arlie Hochschild, who created it to define the sort of work that comes with low-level customer-facing jobs. People who have to put on a false front for the sake of providing good customer service, for instance. Feminists saw the idea, and basically began using it for their own bullshit reasons. Dr. Hochschild disagrees with how they use it, if I understand correctly. I will say that my ex-girlfriend would have adored the concept of "e…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 12:01 PM
26

They want your labor and money. But you and your concerns? Hahahahahahahaha...
/r/MensRights22/08/22 08:33 AM
6

"I'm not a pumpkin, I play the flute."
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:28 AM
251

Feminists: "NO UTERUS, NO OPINION! NO UTERUS, NO OPINION! NO UTERUS, NO OPINION! NO UTERUS, NO OPINION! NO UTERUS, NO OPINION! NO UTERUS, NO OPINION! NO UTERUS, NO OPINION!" Men: ... Feminists: WHY ARE YOU SO QUIET?!??!! Men: Because you told us to shut up for fifty goddamned years, you silly cows. Feminists: SHUT UP!!!!!!
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:27 AM
10

women are objects pushed around by men Except when a woman accomplishes something positive, then it's 100% her own doing and men played no role. Children. These people have the minds of children.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:35 AM
10

Bigotry requires organized enforcement This is opinion, not fact. She has no problem with calling individuals bigots.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:33 AM
1

They basically have no sense of personal responsibility for what they do and they get angry when they are punished by their poor life choices before lashing out at their peers who reviewed and made themselves worthy of their high marks. Perhaps you should talk to their parents. Have you considered that maybe this is a job for the parents rather than for yourself?
/r/MensRights17/06/22 07:37 AM
1

Since you're so good at listening to them, what would they rather be doing?
/r/MensRights16/06/22 10:11 AM
6

Because you don't know who I am, I am going to have mention that I have 2 masters' degrees (one is in education) and I have been teaching college classes for about 15+ years now. I have read through this, and I have reached 2 conclusions: First, I think you lack a fuller perspective to make judgements and second, you don't particularly wish to listen to what your male classmates have to say. Furthermore, you have gathered a bulletproof collection of excuses for not listening to them. If someone …
/r/MensRights15/06/22 12:01 PM
1

As long as you understand the limitations. I agree with your point-- it's obvious that people judge women's actions more charitably-- I just don't think that an implicit bias test is very reliable.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 12:11 AM
5

I'll suggest a possible answer: A false accusation is a potent stealth weapon to be used sparingly. To admit that the weapon exists would be to reduce its effectiveness. To say "yes, I could lie about being raped, but I'm not lying about it on this occasion" would not be a good strategy. On some level, they know it's possible to lie. That's why it needs to be denied so vigorously.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 12:08 AM
0

You should probably ask the people who use them rather than simply assume that the use of an instrument therefore proves the instrument's quality. If the researchers were honest, they will admit that they can't say whether the test measures someone who acts under the influence of stereotypes or whether it simply measures that person's awareness of the stereotypes.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 11:35 AM
1

No response, eh? No surprises there. There rarely are.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 10:25 PM
3

In my senior year, my high school participated in the first "Take your daughters to work day," an event conceived by the Ms. Foundation, which was (and still is) an explicitly feminist organization. My school was a private (mostly white) prep school which could, by no stretch of the imagination, be considered disadvantaged. The event, as they originally conceived it, was that girls (and only girls) would get a day off from school. The day was later changed a few years later, due to outside lobby…
/r/MensRights01/06/22 08:35 AM
2

How do you plan on measuring the increase? In numbers of incidents per year or incident rate per 100,000 people? If you were to examine the latter figure, I don't know if you could even say there's been an increase.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 09:22 AM
2

i’m considering conducting my final dissertation on the topic of incels and how online hate groups have lead to an increase in misogynistic crimes. If you think "incels" and "online hate group" are interchangeable, that's a bit muddled. Additionally, since "hate crimes" have existed before the Internet for many decades, I think you'd be hard-pressed to say that online groups lead to such crimes.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:35 AM
6

Either take a remedial writing class or ask someone to proofread your stuff. This is like something taken out of the Church of the SubGenius.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 08:34 AM
1

No women in my life has ever been a golddigger, That's because they don't instinctively see you as a meal-ticket. Of course you have never personally experienced it! Did you know that brushing something off as a "stereotype" doesn't therefore mean that it never actually happens?
/r/MensRights22/03/22 05:03 AM
1

It's not a stereotype, it's personal experience. Don't you dare tell me that the stuff that happens to me doesn't happen. Maybe that stereotype exists for a reason. Then women like you pop-up and try to say it's completely false. At this point, I don't know if you're trying to fool me or fool yourself.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 10:49 PM
1

And that is all we women ask of them. That, and lots of men's money.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 08:39 AM
6

I don't understand either, but based on the similarities of these cases I think some inferences can be drawn. One of the striking similarities about these cases which appear in the media is that these women are all in their late 20s or their 30s, and they are conventionally attractive (a lot of commentary notices this.) Sometimes, not always, they are married. They are not a very random cross-section of womanhood, in other words. I don't know about the profiles of the victims, but I would assume…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 01:08 AM
4

I remember some publicized study from years ago-- perhaps well over 2 decades ago-- which said that patients would interrupt the speaking of female doctors more often than male doctors. This was naturally interpreted as "patients don't respect female doctors!!!!" A follow-up study, not as well publicized, looked at why and said that the major factor was that people were more comfortable asking questions to female doctors. Which actually sounds rather positive. It didn't get as much attention as …
/r/MensRights11/02/22 03:58 AM
1

I can appreciate the good-faith sentiment which lies behind the item that you wrote-- yes, good on you-- but over many years I have seen FAR too much lying and dishonest, bad faith argumentation from Team Feminism that I cannot forget it. Basically, Team Feminism believes that disseminating disinformation is OK to serve the greater cause. Just as Big Oil lies about climate change and Big Tobacco lies about lung cancer, feminism has taken wholeheartedly to that example. Except they lie about half…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 02:09 AM
3

You think. Maybe you should confirm with a little research? What percentage of single mothers? To raise an obvious question: since the cause of pregnancy is well known, since medical science has provided a variety of contraception options (most of which are only for women to use) and since safe abortion via vacuum curettage has long been a legal right (a few very recent state laws notwithstanding), and it IS possible to give a child up for adoption, there are MANY things a responsible woman can …
/r/MensRights06/01/22 01:20 PM
2

You, son, also did slavery back in ancient Athens. Remember that??
/r/MensRights30/11/21 09:54 AM
1

She doesn't want equality now. It's not smiley-faces and sweet-tasting anymore so she don't want it!
/r/MensRights30/11/21 09:53 AM
1

I grow weary of your sub-moronic 9-year old's antics. Also, I hope you don't choke to death on your Halloween candy, kiddo.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 09:40 AM
23

Haha, "I demand equality until I have to sacrifice something!" haha... you lot are SO goddamned predictable it's beyond pathetic, hahahaa... Lemme guess: You were also the kind of child who'd demand to be included in adult board-games and then, after allowed entry, you'd demand that the rules be changed so you couldn't lose? Hahaa...
/r/MensRights29/11/21 07:22 AM
2

All I can say is that if this law had been in existence back when I broke up with my ex, she would have been in an extremely retaliative mood. She also had the ability to tell incredible lies and vehemently believe in her own lies. She absolutely would have seen this law as an excellent vengeance weapon.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 09:27 AM
1

So, you have no interest in the jury selection item? It wasn't something that matters to you? I figured as much.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 08:32 AM
1

You seemed rather surprised to see that there wasn't a solid wall of harsh disapproval about legalizing sex work in this sub, that's why. As if you'd expected to see the absolute worst reactions possible. Did you read the sentences before the one which triggered you? Or was that stuff wholly uninteresting? I thought it was rather germane to the topic you'd brought up.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 10:06 PM
1

I think you'll find that it is women who are often disproportionately opposed to legalizing sex work. If you talk to a defense lawyer who has defended a client on trial for paying for sex, I think they might refer to that when it comes to jury selection. The old church ladies are the ones who are likeliest to vote "guilty." And during World War II, there was a group of women in the US who organized to write letters to the War Department, urging them to keep their (drafted) sons and brothers and …
/r/MensRights22/09/21 10:49 AM
1

I'm not entirely sure whether or not America is a rape culture, but I actually am leaning more towards thinking it is. I'd like to know why. I would argue that the notion of "rape culture" as it gets used today is preposterous. The term originally came from a description of life for men within prisons, then feminists co-opted the term and used it to describe the fact that mainstream society doesn't share the feminists' unhealthy fixation with rape. Do miscarriages of justice occur? Of course, be…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 11:18 AM
12

Two hundred fifty or so years ago, NO ONE had a right to vote. Use your brain, for fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 10:40 AM
1

So if you factor in all of the unreported rape and sexual assaults And don't forget to factor in the imagined ones.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 07:20 AM
6

I think surrogate motherhood is such an awkward topic because it presents a contradictory situation which is too hard to handle: a woman signs a contract (which feminists think women are free to do), but the feminists also think that not even a contract should waive a woman's abortion option. They don't want to come out and say "we think a woman should not be able to sign a kind of contract" or say "we think a woman should be able to drop out of a contract at will." because they want both to be …
/r/MensRights15/06/21 12:40 PM
5

Oh, that kind of thing is par for the course. Additionally, the radical feminists cannot really confront the fact that violent women exist. They tie themselves into knots making rationalizations.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 12:32 PM
5

Toxic Masculinity I'm going to ask a question about this term to which I have never received an adequate answer: Once you remove the toxic portions of masculinity, are there any traits remaining that aren't gender-neutral?
/r/MensRights11/06/21 08:11 AM
1

Sit down for this, young man-- ready? People sometimes lie about sex. Yes, it's shocking. Yes, this goes-against everything you learned in your Gender Ed 101 textbook but it's true. Now that does not mean that all people lie about sex all the time, no, but if there is a topic that people are not always 100% perfectly frank about... sex is that topic. Is your mind blown? Take a few deep breaths, your head will stop spinning in a second. I know you're fresh-faced and dewey-eyed with your handy, ea…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 01:02 AM
1

They do, try talking to them. It works until it doesn't!
/r/MensRights28/03/21 11:59 PM
1

What, you're referring to this item? Or perhaps this item? The history of computers is certainly amazing.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 05:36 AM
1

Or simply: "Not all feminists hate men, but all man-haters are feminists."
/r/MensRights13/03/21 03:32 AM
1

A month later, this moron's ideas about the Soviet experience in WWII are still memorably idiotic. She is so bone-deep, brainlessly ignorant, it is a painful brand of stupid to encounter. I didn't say anything about it because some statements are just so embarrassingly beneath dumb, that they are impossible to reply to in human language. I shouldn't have reread this thread.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 03:16 AM
3

By the way-- I never meant to imply that you were incapable of building a house-- that would be a sexist idea. I just meant to imply that you're too damn lazy to learn how to build a house or, once you learned how, too damn lazy to actually do any of the work. Cheers!
/r/MensRights15/02/21 08:48 AM
2

Oh yes, you'd have no trouble doing all of that building stuff once you got machines to do everything for you. And once you got more machines to run those machines, you won't even have to get sweaty and you can sit in a chair eating ice cream all day. Right on, sister! I had a girlfriend like you once: Really big, puffed-up rhetoric about how awesome women are and SO much smarter than men they are. But when a fuse blew or the toilet backed-up or an 'on' switch failed to work or a tire went flat,…
/r/MensRights13/02/21 11:57 PM
4

It's great that you clearly know how to build your own house. LOL. That aside, I do recall reading about a lesbian-only commune in the Pacific Northwest in the 70s which existed uncontaminated by men's presence-- with private property being private property and all. Men's presence was unneeded there... until something had to be installed, constructed or repaired, and then the evil patriarchy was suddenly called in. I guess it would be rude to draw any larger, poignant conclusions from that exper…
/r/MensRights13/02/21 06:07 AM
22

I think you don't really know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 06:00 AM
14

Of course not! Where's the sweet sweet female victimhood in that?? /s
/r/MensRights11/01/21 05:56 AM
23

So let us say that a woman shoots 1 man and 1 woman... that proves she hates women? You are aware that violence can have more than "hate" as a motive, right? People could use violence for a variety of reasons. Jealousy. A desire for revenge. An urge to steal. Etc. Right about now, you are probably starting to realize that your hasty statement earlier is not entirely accurate in addition to being unsupported. But perhaps pride is preventing you from admitting a mistake.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 04:56 AM
28

So you categorize a sociopath who is violent against humans as specifically violent against women. At best, that seems like a mischaracterization.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 04:38 AM
27

So a dude shoots 2 men and beats 1 woman-- does that mean he hates women?
/r/MensRights11/01/21 04:20 AM
18

You don't think violence should be contextualized? This is a uni-dimensional view of human behavior that you are offering.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 04:16 AM
20

Prove that men who beat women don’t like women? Do they beat anyone else, or only women?
/r/MensRights11/01/21 04:14 AM
37

I am SO glad that you prefaced your statement with "as a woman." That adds an extreme level of extra value to whatever it is that you say next. Bravery, too! How brave you must be, as a woman! ATTENTION EVERYONE: A WOMAN HAS SPOKEN!! Treat it with the utmost reverence and awe!!
/r/MensRights11/01/21 04:02 AM
1

Well, these terms came out of academia I'm fairly sure that this is backwards in this case. The term "toxic masculinity" was an instance of a term originating online and being adopted by feminist academia. Even if this is not true, there is a habit within feminist spaces to use and mis-use academic terms for the sake of disingenuous argumentation. Regardless, that's the term that was chosen, so we are kind of stuck with it. Any comment on the lack of enthusiasm for "toxic femininity"? Whenever i…
/r/MensRights18/11/20 02:29 PM
1

I'm not using your exact words, no, but you're echoing the same basic idea: that gender is arbitrary socialization. Of course clothing can be changed: I can think of a number of cultures in which men wear items which look similar to skirts (thobes in the Arab world, lavalava in Polynesia, kilts in Scotland) and nobody argues that there's a gene for clothing. However, the notion that a woman's role in society might have a lot to do with the care of children does not obviously seem to be an arbitr…
/r/MensRights18/11/20 02:16 PM
1

All right, so your idea is that people (regardless of genetic makeup) are born the same, and it is arbitrary socialization which sets them onto different gendered paths. I would love it if you could adduce some proof to support this supposition. Otherwise, I can dismiss your position without proof.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 10:02 AM
3

The male gender construct says that men are "strong", but in real life not all men are strong. Gender says men are a certain way, but on reality that doesn't match up, which is why the concept is flawed. So your analysis amounts to a circumloquacious version of "stereotypes can be wrong." That's hardly a new or original idea. Did you know that a great many of the thoughtful people on earth are already well aware that stereotypes can be wrong?
/r/MensRights10/11/20 12:58 PM
3

"men are physically strong" So you're saying physical strength is something that can't be associated with women? Ever seen the Olympics? Did you know women can even play sports in high school nowadays? There are plenty of female athletes. And since you believe all gender is harmful, it doesn't make sense to call something "toxic masculinity" then. Not unless you're also enthusiastic about the term "toxic femininity," but that term doesn't come very easily to you now, does it? I know it barely ge…
/r/MensRights10/11/20 09:54 AM
2

We're in the same time zone.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 09:51 AM
10

The problem is that the people who love using the term "toxic masculinity" want to have it both ways: claim that there is no positive part of masculinity which women do not possess (masculinity doesn't exist), but the toxic bits are pretty much only possessed by men, (so it's OK to call it masculinity because masculinity is real now).
/r/MensRights09/11/20 11:21 PM
3

You'll notice that the dude isn't replying.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 11:20 PM
8

obviously men can act however they want Is this so obvious? I can name a bunch of men who were punished or even killed for their beliefs throughout history.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 09:58 AM
26

I was wondering what everyone here thinks of feminism. I think it's a fundamentally dishonest movement, and it's paradigm of analysis is not only broken, but useless for men. For women, it's largely a bunch of self-serving rhetoric, slimy special pleading, feel-good pandering and convenient "having it both ways" argumentation. I can absolutely understand its popularity among women who possess the minds of adolescents and who want to have their cake and eat it too. For women who wish to live as r…
/r/MensRights09/11/20 09:41 AM
2

There is also the fact that teenage Mary Shelley had no experience publishing literature but her husband, Percy Bysshe Shelley, absolutely did. It seems to me that turning her little home-made story into an actual published work might've required a teeny little bit of help, which her husband gallantly denied giving. Interestingly, Mary Shelley never wrote anything else like Frankenstein later in her life.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 12:40 AM
2

Here's a fun bit of trivia about "The Mask You Live In"... The film is about how damaging and terrible it is for men to be macho and alpha. The film's executive producer is named Maria Shriver. Who (until 2011) was married to a man named Arnold Schwarzenegger. Go look up her name. Right? So apparently she had no problem with loving and marrying a dude who was a Mr. Olympia, movie star and California governor. Obviously, she didn't believe in the movie's message herself, did she? She literally ma…
/r/MensRights08/09/20 02:06 PM
1

Let me try again... At the beginning, I asked: are there any non-toxic masculine traits that women do not possess... and you said "no." There are no innate male traits. Okay? You said that, so it's all right. Okay... so non-toxic masculinity is... a woman. Right? That's just the inverse expression. Is that simple enough? I don't see why you needed to argue that point. We've come full circle. Really, dude-- I'm trying to meet you halfway. I'm not a cannibal, honest. It's like you're disagreeing w…
/r/MensRights06/09/20 10:02 AM
1

When did I say that masculinity doesn’t exist? You’re pulling that out of nowhere. I don’t think that a lot of masculinity is innate, but it clearly exists. Isn't it just a mirage, though? It is the name given to certain traits which both women and men possess and there's nothing male about it, yeah? Blue isn't a masculine color, it's just a color. You said it's like money: it ceases to mean anything when people decide it's just paper and the paper is what really exists; the representation of va…
/r/MensRights05/09/20 11:37 PM
1

So it would be more appropriate to call it “toxic personhood enforced on women” and “toxic personhood enforced on men” because there’s a difference that needs to be recognised. Except you don't say those things. You didn't begin with those terms, your teachers don't use those terms and no one you know uses those terms. So it makes me wonder why you and other like-minded people insist on using a term that you admit to not be a good term. You don't say "toxic behaviors," but you insist on saying "…
/r/MensRights05/09/20 01:09 AM
1

Is it incorrect for someone to take your "toxic masculinity" arguments and come-away with the conclusion that women are better, more evolved people? It would be a logical and intuitive conclusion to reach, after all. I didn’t mention women once in my reply You said "there are no traits that only men have that women universally do not possess, obviously," And I quoted you. So you DID mention women in your reply. See? And now we're both here talking about this, so let's stop beating around the bus…
/r/MensRights04/09/20 10:46 PM
1

Well there are no traits that only men have that women universally do not possess, obviously Ahh, here we go- So the positive aspects of masculinity are possessed by women in healthy amounts-- so that stuff is not really "masculinity" then, just personhood. Yeah? Why even call it "masculinity" if women possess it in a healthy balance? It's just personhood that we're talking about, right? It sounds a bit awkward to say that women possess all of the positive, healthy, non-toxic traits of masculini…
/r/MensRights03/09/20 11:25 PM
1

Ok, but that doesn't address my question. Once you remove the toxic, objectionable parts of masculinity-- what is left-over that isn't gender neutral? Or, to rephrase it, is there any non-toxic "masculine" trait that women do not also possess?
/r/MensRights02/09/20 10:45 PM
3

They support shared parenting the same way I support a charity I don't give any money to.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 02:38 AM
1

Question for you: If one were to remove the toxic bits from masculinity, what is left-over that isn't a gender-neutral characteristic? I've never gotten a clear answer to this question.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 01:53 AM
4

When you ask feminists to describe what is left of masculinity when you remove the toxic bits, they can only name gender-neutral characteristics. In other words: there is no masculinity, only toxic masculinity. Masculinity is toxic, every other trait is gender-neutral. There is no room for the idea that there is a specifically masculine trait that isn't toxic.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 11:39 AM
6

Although maybe it makes sense for women to be on guard movement-wise for that sort of thing That's virtually hate speech in some quarters. I wouldn't repeat that on a college campus. I mean, look, it is correct that women are subjected to sexual violence far more frequently than men. That is also the only category of violence that women are subjected to more than men. That's probably the reason you keep hearing about it. And if you consider "forced to penetrate" as a kind of analogous sexual ass…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 05:57 AM
1

Well, I don't certainly know anyone who condones inappropriate physical harassment. Sexual assault is definitely a problem that quite a few women have faced and continue to face. What's the value in condemning something that is already universally condemned by pretty much everyone? Do we need to double-super-duper condemn it here online or something? Maybe I could shake my fist and rip my robes in anger? Would that help you out?
/r/MensRights07/04/20 05:46 AM
1

One time, I was in a bar talking to someone. He'd recently visited a local business. By coincidence, I had acquired a small stake in that business. Since I'd had a bit to drink, I chuckled and said a bit loudly "You know, I happen to own 3% of that company!" He and I had a good laugh. Immediately after, the two women nearby-- who hadn't so much as acknowledged my presence until then-- suddenly wanted to have a drink with me. And I wasn't really in the mood to talk to them. Was this not an exampl…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 05:20 AM
7

What is the difference between objectifying someone and admiring someone? I've never gotten a straight answer to that question. The feminist answer is some variation of "when a man objectifies a woman, there's something evil and impure going on in his mind." Okay, and how do you know the content of someone else's mind? The feminist just knows. Only she can tell you what's really going on in your mind. You're not qualified to say what's in your mind. At this point, you start to suspect that "obje…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 05:05 AM
4

No, you need to be respectable. Or, I dunno, maybe try the same argument while dressing like a circus clown? Or while dumping a bucket of shit over your own head? The argument should still hold true in either case. Attempt it yourself babe, and let me know what you think.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 01:12 PM
1

I'm looking through your lens - why don't you try to view the world through mine? I honestly think I've already been required to look through that lens more times than I can count.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 01:16 AM
1

Yeah, but I think the situation brings into perspective that ultimately, one's quality of life is important as well, and focusing solely on wages misses a great deal of information. I know rich people whom I wouldn't trade places with. I know people in high-prestige careers who have really nice houses, but they're never at home because they're working all the time. What good is having a lot of money if you never get to enjoy it and you die early from a heart attack?
/r/MensRights07/03/20 11:51 PM
3

I think it would help if I gave an illustration which is a bit less abstract: my aunt and uncle have been married for about 30 years; they're both working-class people. My uncle was a mover, my aunt worked in a mail room; they decided they didn't want kids. Years of being a mover did a real number on my uncle's back. About ten years ago, he started to be in constant back pain. And I'm not talking about dull aches, I'm talking debilitating pain from his spinal discs, making movement difficult and…
/r/MensRights07/03/20 05:53 AM
2

it's a fix both The only time I ever hear feminists say "fix both" is in response to assholes like me who force the acknowledgement that there is, in fact, another perspective to be heard.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 05:32 AM
2

I'm pointing out with this statement that more women will do something. Not that they're wrong, but this accounts for some of the difference. Sure, there are multiple factors at work. So that means that you need to control for the multiple factors. The studies which do control for multiple factors (comparing men and women with similar levels of education, work experience, consecutive years in the workplace, childlessness, etc) reduces the wage gap to nearly zero. Are there things that women are …
/r/MensRights07/03/20 01:51 AM
4

That's true. But, why? Could it be that a good part of women are expected to also clean and do housework and chores more often? How much of that accounts for the difference? I would say one of the biggest factors has to do with the fact that one sex has babies and the other doesn't. In this day and age, having babies is a choice so women are opting to walk on that path. And options have a price, whether the option is exercised or not. Sometimes-- sit down, this might shock you-- spending time wi…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 06:52 AM
1

It was always understood to have been a wartime measure and not a permanent one; it was also sexist to have drafted only men in the first place. That being said: Obviously, there was a mix of employment arrangements so it isn't really accurate to say they were either "forced out" or "left," it was a mix. I will also mention that having a bunch of jobless, demobilized soldiers going onto the streets wouldn't have been a good thing either (some people predicted that the end of the war would be fol…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 09:53 AM
2

Thanks for posting this.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 10:45 PM
2

There is such a thing as too much complexity; keeping it simple does have its virtues.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 06:45 AM
1

Do you need the "who taught them the behavior" step? Since both answers lead to the same place, there's no choice. Instead of "beyond bad" maybe the word "egregious" would be better? And I think "She learned it from men" makes more sense than "some people do bad things".
/r/MensRights07/02/20 04:34 AM
1

Thanks. I learned a lesson or two, though.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:51 PM
7

Oh yeah. I once had a head-spinning dialogue with this one feminist who seemed to be stricken with a form of light Down Syndrome; she was all insistent that we find "common ground" and have a good faith dialogue, and find areas of common interest. She spent the entire goddamned conversation trying to goad me into organizing a bunch of men to go attack Roosh V. That should be my top priority in life. As soon as I strayed to something of more relevance to myself, she'd bring it right back to how a…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:38 AM
29

A lot of you won't listen regardless of what words we use. At best, you'll give us 15 seconds before insisting the conversation go back to "What Men Can Do For Me", where all attention properly belongs.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 12:12 AM
3

Honestly the ongoing inability of them to address the elephant in the room is almost funny in its way. I think it is what anthropologists call "ritual avoidance" or, to use the Polynesian term, taboo. Certain things are too sacred to say or even think.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 06:02 AM
3

They're responding to genuine risks to their livelihood and career. Are they supposed to take it passively? Yes. They are supposed to act as if they are not targets in a shooting gallery, even as the ladies brandish and brag about the rifles which they have been issued. They are to carry on normally, ignoring any bullets whizzing by their ears.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 06:01 AM
5

Roxane Gay tweeted Oh, she managed to temporarily set aside the giant bucket of hash browns smothered with sausage gravy and caramel sauce, did she?
/r/MensRights17/01/20 03:37 AM
1

They also want other women to enter STEM fields. Math is hard, after all.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 12:45 AM
2

Christ, how is a person supposed to talk to women? "P-p-p-p-please, m-m-m-m-iss? C-c-c-can y-y-you t-t-t-ttake your f-f-f-f-finger outta my eye p-p-p-p-please?? N-n-no? ...... okay......"
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:11 PM
5

You don't want to help her with the kids? If they're not my kids also, then not really. I owe the single moms of the world NOTHING.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 06:19 AM
2

This is an oddly worried-seeming op-ed piece. When this chick gets her first boytoy-bot, she'll complain about the lack of realistic foreplay. Just you watch.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 02:08 AM
2

There was a Russian TV commentator who referred to this movie as a "lesbian revenge fantasy."
/r/MensRights15/12/19 01:42 AM
1

Until government policy changes, you are certainly allowed to donate your money to any free-abortion charity that you wish and you can set a good example for everyone else to follow. Go right ahead. No one is stopping you.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 06:14 AM
22

You’re crying over paying for her $25 dinner Not as bad as getting butthurt over the sheer madness of being asked to pay for what you've eaten.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 12:20 AM
1

It's more understandable when you realize that "Affordable" = "Free"
/r/MensRights10/12/19 06:00 AM
4

If she wants mo' money, she could always mo' my lawn....
/r/MensRights04/12/19 02:21 AM
1

I'd have accidentally broken her finger while admiring it.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 02:02 AM
1

I take it that you hadn't planted that seed.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:55 AM
3

Was this the one where the chick claimed she was raped on a pile of broken glass?
/r/MensRights13/11/19 05:06 AM
1

Ok. That's a decent answer. What would have made the female characters human, then? Having them knee the dude in the balls?
/r/MensRights09/11/19 11:37 PM
1

So you are clearly aware of why anyone would be less than 100% enthusiastic about the #MeToo thing, in which it is considered an unalloyed act of brilliance and progress to point fingers without evidence.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 05:07 AM
2

Long story short: a Duke U lacrosse team had a house party and hired strippers. One of the strippers showed up either drunk or high, locked herself in the bathroom, made a mess and was basically paid to leave prematurely. She got picked up by police and was sent to a hospital, she overheard a discussion about whether or not she needed to be sent to a mental ward and then, on the spot, said claimed she had been raped at the party. At that point, the matter was turned into a sexual assault reporti…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:54 AM
13

They hang out at that bar in Mos Eisley spaceport.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:07 AM
1

I only wish you'd caught me when I wasn't so busy. Are you familiar with the 2006 Duke University Lacrosse Rape hoax? That incident, better than anything else in my lifetime, exposed the illiberal dishonesty at the core of the movement.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 02:55 AM
11

i took said that the most important part of the movement was questioning everything and being critical...apparently not the case. For them "critical thinking" means "finding ways to reach feminist-approved conclusions." And the conclusions are always known beforehand. I remember reading some article written by a self-described "feminist mom" about how her boy watched girls in his school getting away with bad behavior with no punishment, and he reached the (obviously crazy) conclusion that teache…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 01:50 AM
3

If you wanted to do an art project, I've long had some ideas for cartoons. Like a person standing on top of a giant pile of faceless bloody corpses, scanning the horizon with a telescope, saying: "Oh no, is that a woman in danger??"
/r/MensRights08/11/19 01:49 AM
3

I've come to the conclusion that feminism is itself based in envy and resentment It appeals to women's prejudices and it provides a set of political theories to rationalize the prejudices. You end up with a mishmash of contradictions where the conclusions are always going to be the same regardless of whatever evidence you put out. Women live longer than men? Women are oppressed. Women are less likely to die in the workplace? Women are oppressed. Women get lighter punishments for the same crimes?…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 01:46 AM
1

“John included an image of a dumbbell in his painting, thats a symbol for toxic masculinity!!” Golly, and women are never allowed to use dumbbells... Has feminism damaged your or caused you guilt or anything similar? YES. I could sit here for an hour and explain why, but it usually does no good because few people listen without screaming insults at you. I've seen so many feminists lie shamelessly throughout my life, that I habitually can't take them seriously about anything. Let's just say, for …
/r/MensRights08/11/19 01:31 AM
2

You are reading way to into this It's because I don't understand why, in a conversation with two humans, the one who starts it is a human and the other isn't. But only in dating situations and apparently not in any other conversational situation.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 12:11 AM
1

Thanks for taking the time to write that. And honestly, I kind of see the appeal to arranged marriages? I can see some wisdom in it but it wouldn't appeal to me. Marriages, in some cultures, are a very big deal. One time, when I was traveling in an Arab country, the guesthouse owner invited me to an engagement party. I went there (sexes were separated into different venues) and it was a large gathering with dozens of people to announce the father announcing his acceptance of the future son-in-la…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 04:06 AM
2

Because growing up, I saw women on tv immediately say yes, to any guy, like they had no will of their own. There are lots of examples of programs where women will punch or knee a dude in the balls for asking her out. You never noticed those? When two people don't know each other, somebody has to start things or else they can't talk to each other. But let's not think about the "asking on a date" situation, here: I mean imagine two people who are simply talking for the first time at a professional…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 03:11 AM
2

"I'm the bearded lady! What are you? One of the freaks??"
/r/MensRights06/11/19 03:08 AM
10

They expect their feminist male allies to pay for the movie tickets.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 12:48 AM
5

Hell, the US kills Al Qaeda's #2 man a couple times a year. I think that's the #3. The latest one is a hairy chap by the name of sheikh Waeel-i Koyoti. He used to smuggle rockets from the ACME mail-order corporation.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 12:43 AM
8

made me feel like a thing not a person, if I was asked out. Why would it make you feel that way? People usually don't talk to things, you know. They usually talk to a person. Have you ever tried talking to a table or a rock or a tree? It's not very fun.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 12:39 AM
1

Wasn't there a video where she was demonstrating this, and the dude sitting in the chair is like "this hurts" and she professes to care "ooh, I don't want it to hurt..." Yes you do want it to hurt, you disingenuous herpes sore. You want to humiliate and crush testicles. That's the point. That's the purpose. Why else would you make an ugly chair that nobody would voluntarily sit in?
/r/MensRights05/11/19 12:37 AM
6

Why does "female independence" seem to mean "not fucking"?
/r/MensRights01/11/19 10:38 PM
4

No no, see, those are good fun. Toys. Not at all like robots, those might cause you to go out and rape women. Somehow. Which is what pornography does.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 10:37 PM
7

But those are different because blah dee blah blah.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 10:36 PM
8

Depends, if you identify as a female asexual, you can do whatever. If not, you are advised to jump into the nearest wood-chipper or car compactor. Oh, and do the responsible thing: hand-over your bank account first.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 05:00 AM
1

Additionally, there is also the not-insignificant fact that the Y chromosome contains the genes for sperm production and not merely penises. Proteins on the Y chromosome also get expressed in testes and prostates.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 04:59 AM
31

Giving into sexual urges that everyone has. No no, only all women, hot men and same sex couples can correctly be sexual. Everyone else is a sicko unevolved perv.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 01:48 AM
12

It's cool, she was under a trance the whole time.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 12:07 AM
1

A fundamental mismatch between what available men in the United States can offer $$$ And what available women in the United States are willing to accept. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$...
/r/MensRights31/10/19 07:49 AM
2

Well, look, I don't want to nit-pick too many aspects of your historical perspective but the whole notion of romantic love being a basis for marriage is relatively recent, starting in Europe in the 1600s. For much of human history, parents were heavily involved in creating couples and marriages were basically a land or property transaction-- often the largest transfer of property that one would see in their lifetime. Among elites, marriages were sometimes made to guarantee political agreements; …
/r/MensRights29/10/19 11:46 AM
2

Thanks for taking the time to write back. I shared the story not because it was the most negative story I had about meeting people online (believe me, I could've recalled far worse instances) but I mentioned it because it felt so typical and banal despite it also being kind of weird. This was the regular kind of weirdness and flakiness that I kept dealing with. I'm glad she didn't end up wasting more of my time, frankly. There were women who were far worse that I'm not going to talk about. Today…
/r/MensRights29/10/19 01:57 AM
3

Girlfriends buying you dinner Stop pretending this happens more than once or twice per lifetime.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 12:19 PM
1

So did I address your questions?
/r/MensRights28/10/19 09:57 AM
1

Trump is to men's rights what Lyle Lanley is to selling quality monorails.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 06:44 AM
1

I will say that male and female candidates have different advantages and disadvantages working for them. All things being equal, female candidates of Clintons' generation are never forced to explain why they weren't fighting in Vietnam (Hillary was a Congressional staffer during the tail end of the Vietnam years.) And for all the fulminating about women politicians being criticized for their looks, it is not as if male politicians don't ever get criticized based on their looks either. About 8 ye…
/r/MensRights28/10/19 01:10 AM
1

Hahaha...
/r/MensRights26/10/19 09:42 AM
3

if I've been talking to a dude for 30 minutes and he's like, hey let's meet up, I dunno... that does make me feel a little leery? That's a natural thing to think, but I heavily summarized our interactions there. It wasn't 30 minutes. In reality, we had been corresponding back and forth fairly regularly for well over a week up until that point; it had been light and friendly and I thought we'd had enough things in common that I was willing to take a chance with her. I didn't attempt to invite her…
/r/MensRights26/10/19 07:50 AM
2

but never say anything. What was the point? Getting him to waste time pursuing her. Again, a lot of the women just want attention and don't actually want to meet anyone. A long time ago on Yahoo personals (before there were pictures on the profiles), I met this woman and we had a back and forth that, after the typical friendly introduction banter to get her interested in talking, went like this: Her: Wow, you're really smart and interesting and polite and funny and you really seem like a great g…
/r/MensRights26/10/19 02:32 AM
9

And the men who I am talking about are good men. That's basically irrelevant to women's attraction. In online dating, it's all looks. Really, a lot of women aren't using dating sites in the way they were intended to be used. The intention was for people to meet other people. Instead, we have a goddamned circus where the bottom 50% of the men get virtually 0% of the messages and the top 1% of the men apparently get mobbed. A lot of women on these services just want to feel the validation of seein…
/r/MensRights25/10/19 06:11 AM
4

Basically. You're acting entitled if you say she isn't entitled to free shit. You're savagely forcing ideas on her. Raping her with your words. Murdering her with your eyeballs. Now you owe her big time so pay up. She's an idiot. Ladies-- I know you lurk here-- what do you think of the cultural milieu which celebrates and encourages this kind of attitude? Any idiot woman is 100% in the right, even when she's barking mad?
/r/MensRights24/10/19 04:36 AM
2

This person doesn't know what the word "entitled" means while applying her nonsense personal definition to everybody except herself. She's an irrational attack machine, the kind of drunk woman who thinks she can assault cops at will. Everyone else exists to service her whim. Because everyone else is "entitled," whatever the hell that means. So you give her the money which accidentally happens to be in your wallet, because it rightly belongs to her, you entitled grabby bastard you. Everything she…
/r/MensRights24/10/19 04:35 AM
1

Yes. And that will be the case until men have built utopia for them. So roll up your sleeves and start pouring concrete so that one day your date will finally help out when the check arrives.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 03:58 AM
1

Hit on OH DEAR GOD NO, NOT THAT, HOW DID SHE EVER SURVIVE THE HORROR?!?!?!?!
/r/MensRights21/10/19 06:18 AM
20

I don't know about the tastes of sex-bot connoisseurs, but I definitely think that if I were to own such a device, I would really love to have a sex-bot which lacked a vaginal opening but featured a 4-hour lecture about the role of female cigarette-roller unions in the Catalonian anarcho-syndicalist uprisings of the Spanish Civil War. The lecture would be on infinite loop with no "off" switch, at a high volume, with a halting synthetic voice that was nasal and reminiscent of a 1980s experimental…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 11:54 PM
12

"You sure sound CUNTfused."
/r/MensRights16/10/19 07:21 AM
2

Hahaha, what the fuck is this pathetic nonsense? Yes, Teh Paytreeurkee really really cares if you spend your old age in a never-visited apartment. That TRULY matters to the evil overlords. And whatever you do, aging feminists: don't overdose on sleeping pills. The patriarchy simply hates it when you do something naughty and empowering like that!
/r/MensRights16/10/19 03:47 AM
6

Sounds as if someone is pissed that the movie didn't set off a spate of incel terrorist incidents.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 12:59 PM
12

But, it became an "us vs them" argument telling men to be less fucking competitive as opposed to, you know, telling women to be more competitive. Why should women have to change when they're already perfect? Stupid men, hogging all the money by working harder. Next, you'll claim that an evil man having more work experience is a valid reason to not hire a semi-literate vagina-haver who has experience having a vagina. What, you'd rather hire someone who can do the job than someone who can visually…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 12:57 PM
10

So if men weren't so eager to pay the whole fucking thing, "Golly, so many women would happily forgo free dinners, if only vile sexist oppressive men weren't savagely preventing them from doing so!"
/r/MensRights10/10/19 12:34 AM
16

That's because men are so lazy, they take their position for granted, and they don't care who pays. Which is why they need to make more money. And, like, men are lazy because they don't do enough catcalling either, and they should stop. And, also, women only get 79 rapes for every 100 rapes they earn... I'll start again. Following women's incoherent complaints is a full time job in of itself, I tell you.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 05:50 AM
7

Hahaha.... delicioso. Is there a rule that the ladies get to keep rolling the dice until they get the number they want? Jail is for men only, I assume? It wouldn't be a proper feminist game unless men got time in jail while the women got counseling.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 05:31 AM
2

Hey, doll, if you truly don't want to be burdened with kids... then, uh, don't have kids? Just a thought. If you choose to be burdened, that's on you.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 04:27 AM
1

If there is but one man left, patriarchy would still exist. In fact, it would exist worse than ever and we have to kill that last man. And then spend a few decades killing-off any women laboring under patriarchy's residual false consciousness until only a few women are left. And then they can happily eat ice cream and cake until the electricity permanently goes-off 1 week later.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 02:10 AM
4

I want people to understand that patriarchy is not men,” she caveated. Oh of course not. Let's kill men, though. To target patriarchy. This woman needs Thorazine and plenty of it.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 02:07 AM
5

Absolutely! It's wrong for money-obsessed men to deny equal money to women who don't care about money! Fair is fair! Equality! Turtle poop! Square pegs! Ishkabibble!
/r/MensRights05/10/19 02:39 AM
3

It's the attenuation of the 3rd wave, dumber and more demanding. What do they do? They demand "Whatever princess wants RIGHT NOW, damn it."
/r/MensRights05/10/19 02:22 AM
5

Feminists "We want equality for men and women" Also feminists "Let's kill men!" You see a problem there? They want equal numbers of men and women killed, is what they mean. Probably. Maybe. Or, I dunno, maybe I don't know how to do feminism good enough?
/r/MensRights05/10/19 02:20 AM
12

It lasts until their water stops flowing, their garbage isn't picked up, their lights don't come on, etc. Oh no no no. In feminist fantasy-world, that shit just takes care of itself! When a storm blows-down a power-line, it just hops right back up there and keeps working. Water line bursts in the street? same thing. Garbage goes out onto the pavement and vanishes. Forever and ever.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 02:17 AM
2

...? This reads like fiction.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 04:51 AM
15

So the "benevolent sexist" men are hard-core misogynists, I see. No better than "malevolently sexist" men. All teh menhz iz misogynists. Tsk.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 05:08 AM
5

Kill the bastard! There is never any excuse for a man to not do X upon a woman's command!!1!!
/r/MensRights30/09/19 06:07 AM
2

The reply I've gotten is that objectification can only really happen when a man looks at a woman and finds her attractive, and that can only be sinister and harmful, though the nature of the harm is never really anything more than creating discomfort, which naturally progresses into full-on genocide. It can't happen any other way, only when sexiness and eyeballs are involved. A woman doing the same to men is good clean fun, though. No harm is done when that happens. It's why I can't take the con…
/r/MensRights29/09/19 01:41 AM
6

I don't care how much money a millionaire has. $3 million, $5 million, $7.2 million... it's no object at all.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 01:40 PM
2

I hope no one ever steals a penny from her. That'd be way worse than happening across a man who joked about rape in an empty room once. Not me he says as he returns his library book 2 days late. Not me he says as he ties his shoelaces too long so the ends get muddy. Not me he says as he inconsiderately takes the last Fudgsicle from the freezer. Not me he says as he squeezes the toothpaste tube from the middle. Not me he says as he holds the door open because he thinks it's polite. Not me he says…
/r/MensRights27/09/19 05:18 AM
6

I don't get this incoherent swirl of random complaints. Are these dudes out there- these imagined demons- are they mistreating women straight and directly to their faces, or are there no women actually present in the room when the mistreatment is being dished out? If it's the latter and no harm is being inflicted against anyone then, uh... what harm is being done exactly? Are people not entitled to the privacy of their own thoughts? She certainly feels entitled to her own private thoughts, I wou…
/r/MensRights27/09/19 04:49 AM
22

I don't know about you, but whenever I see a well-heeled professional woman, I just drop my caveman club and run screaming for the hills. "She has so much stability! NOOOOO!"
/r/MensRights27/09/19 04:26 AM
20

Whatever makes men into the biggest idiots and blame-absorbers is the correct lane.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 04:24 AM
21

It's not the money! Oh no no. Perish the thought. It's about men's ambition. Or them being hard working. Or even- dare I say it?- having a good network of contacts in an industry! Yeah, such traits are really really lovable and sexy in a partner. But it's certainly not about the filthy money. Because, if it were- and it's not- that would make wives into a special brand of whores and it would be rude to suggest that marriage is a kind of elaborate sex-for-food swap. Female chimpanzees? Sure, they…
/r/MensRights27/09/19 03:49 AM
2

I've never understood the charge of objectification; it always seemed like a bogus concept to me. What's the difference between "objectifying" someone and "admiring" someone? I've never gotten a straight answer. The "objectifier" is ugly, and the "admirer" is handsome, I guess. The answer seems to boil down to what is happening inside the beholder's mind, which only a trained feminist can deduce via her telepathic powers. When you walk past someone without looking at them, are you not treating t…
/r/MensRights27/09/19 01:16 AM
10

"Keyword: proven" You mean the accusation of an anonymous, weepy woman isn't all the proof you need to get a conviction?? YOU MONSTER!! Rape culture!!! Misogyny!!!
/r/MensRights26/09/19 05:56 AM
4

Of course you can post. You will need thick skin. We all do.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 06:22 AM
2

Because men need to be taught a lesson. And only a woman can set those stupid Neanderthals straight about what "equality" means and why men should also pay for women's stuff and it's important for men to fulfill their traditional duties but it's toxic for them to fulfill their traditional duties.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 01:32 AM
11

"Fragility." Yes, because it's men who totally demand speech codes, safe-spaces and that bouncers protect them from unwanted fuckin' eyeballs.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 11:30 PM
8

if there were no group whose purpose was to defend the rights of women If only there were a group which was dedicated to policing society. A specially-trained group of men and women who would police others and keep public order. Yes, and perhaps these so-called "police men" and "police women" might wear uniforms and be given law enforcement powers to make sure that we could have safety on the streets. If only there were such people. Ahh, to dream a crazy dream....
/r/MensRights23/09/19 06:19 AM
6

they just only care about women's issues And lie their asses off when necessary. It's a noble lie, so they're not the bad kind of liars, though.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 06:16 AM
6

Star Lines CEO: "The Titanic passengers were stunned by the once-in-a-lifetime experience."
/r/MensRights19/09/19 07:05 AM
12

The happiest women I know are all married stay at home Mother's (I know them through Church). Because they're deluded by patriarchy and don't know any better! The unhappiest women I know are all single, childless, career girls. Because they are more fully aware of what a patriarchal society we live in! Do I win a Popsicle?
/r/MensRights19/09/19 07:02 AM
1

I bet she'd hate being asked about the Scottsboro Boys. Her type tends to have a headachey little meltdown about that. If this woman is to be believed, being accused of rape is a net benefit to the individual.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 07:00 AM
2

Indeed. Until the early 1990s, they used to deny that there was similar levels of violence within lesbian couples as well; that went against all the theories. Today, they deny having ever denied it now that it is now undeniable. Turns out they were openly writing about it in the era in which there were no articles about it at all.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 05:27 AM
1

Also I'm a Christian lol Yes, again, the wrong kind of feminist. I think we've adequately gone over that.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 05:23 AM
20

And I hate you for it. And I had my favourite examples, Yes, your marginal and superficial examples. Wow, hairstyles can change? Clothing can change?? Damn, that can only mean that girls can conceivably have penises and ball sacks!
/r/MensRights19/09/19 05:22 AM
6

Well according to them it was because I was saying things that didnt agree with their information they want spread. Right. I reiterate: wrong kind of feminist. I'm sympathetic to your point of view. Feminists are totally OK with hijabs. But if there was some kind of Christian pro-modesty movement which tried to restrict how women dressed, they'd scream all about the misogyny of it all. They have some very odd... blind spots which deserve the label 'hypocritical.' Certain types of female oppressi…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 06:44 AM
14

I got banned even though I am a feminist. Ahh but you were the wrong kind of feminist, making you no better than a fuckin' man, maaaan.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:14 AM
7

In the early 1990s, I distinctly remember having at least two (female) literature teachers who seemed to have a real problem with boys. They also treated female students with a great deal more politeness. Naturally, it was useless to say anything about this; I do think people noticed, however. For the second teacher, I wrote a satirical item which I anonymously pinned on the school bulletin board; "suggestions" for students. Among other things, I suggested that if male students wanted to do well…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:20 AM
6

but you don't go jogging through the Kruger Park. Really, now? Isn't this a kind of victim blaming? Shouldn't someone be teaching the lions not to savor the taste of supple human flesh? Isn't it every person's right to go jogging through Kruger Park wearing nothing but a skirt made of sausages and honey-cured bacon? What human-hating, human-oppressing bastard wishes to rob people of their all-important right to cross-country run through a nature preserve after painting themselves in pork gravy?!…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 05:50 AM
9

According to Israeli ultra-nationalists, any Jew who criticizes Israeli policy is a self-hating Jew. It's a term of abuse. If you don't dance to the feminist tune, you're mentally unwell.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 02:54 AM
1

What I say is so obviously sarcastic that it would feel a bit redundant to include that. If I get the occasional downvote, it comes with the territory.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 03:24 AM
613

She might have added that some women want the comforts of society which men have built, but don't see much value in the men who built it.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 03:22 AM
1

She didn't do it and it's your fault she did.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 08:55 AM
3

If they have too dreamboaty an actor, it might create sympathy. I guess the way you'd compensate for that is have the rape be super duper extra brutal, and then put some ugly make up on him afterwards. Maybe have the whole film be in black and white with harsh lighting after the rape scene, too. Make it look like Schindler's List. The victim needs to look extra victimy. There was an episode of Medium, the TV series, where they had a character who was a rapist released from jail. He served his ti…
/r/MensRights13/09/19 03:30 AM
3

Let's be honest: Brock Turner gets so much attention because he ticks all the right boxes bandied about by the Raep Kulchur Kult: innocent-looking white boys from good families are the biggest rapists of them all. They look so fucking innocent, you just wanna rip their goddamned hair out, one handful after the other until they're bleeding from their bald scalps. Steubenville almost fit the bill, but the town was too poor and working-class. Cosby was a bit too black. The Duke Lacrosse team was, u…
/r/MensRights13/09/19 01:30 AM
17

Now that women have Fought So Hard For Equality But It Still Isn't Here, there's a lotttta disappointed lil' ladies out there bemoaning the lack of rich, superior CEO dudes who'll pamper them like courtesans. Shed a tear for their sad sad plight. Women Just Can't Win. They Just Can't Win. They Just Can't Win. Oh no. They Just Can't Win. Always getting the short end of every stick. Always dealt the worst cards. Always holding the empty bag. Just Can't Win. Nope. Darn. Darnie darn darn. Better go …
/r/MensRights13/09/19 01:19 AM
20

Aahaahahahahaha, does it really say that? Haahahaahahaha... Jesus god almighty. There is fantasy and there is high fantasy and there is, well, that.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 01:14 AM
1

If a friend asks me out for dinner, I don't expect them to pay for me. Yes, but that's a friend though. This is a heterosexual date with a female woman lady girl of the opposite sex with Double-X chromosomes. There are only 3 proper ways to go in that case: Is the asker male? If yes, they pay for everything. Is the asker non-female? If yes, they pay for everything. Is the non-asker non-male? Go to 1 or 2. Any other arrangement would be an abomination and the universe itself would split open in a…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 01:37 PM
3

Look, I don't know the details about the situation, but it is possible that he judged the evening, said to himself "nah, this isn't going to work out, I don't see a future with her." And he cut his losses. He obviously wasn't expecting a second date. Seriously. People don't seem to get this: He wasn't expecting a second date with that chick. There would be no "next time you can get your half of the check, Miss Respectable Strong Corporate Superwoman Ugogirl" opportunity. You can talk about how g…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 01:26 PM
8

I'm also not in the US, dunno if that's why. That's probably why. A lot of US women think men ought to throw money at them all the time. It's also sexist for a man to earn more money than a woman, so the modern US gal wants equal pay and the money in your wallet. That's all she wants, simple! I've dated women from the former Soviet states and they absolutely do expect men to pay for everything too. But the difference is that they don't call you a sexist pig every 7 seconds so it's a lot less hyp…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 12:34 PM
3

It's a place for you, I'm glad to hear your perspective. There's not a lot of detail but in the story above, she wasn't into him and he probably picked up on that. That's fine, it's her prerogative to not be into him. And? He wasn't into being chivalrous, that is also his prerogative. If he has no chance of a second date, if he read her properly, realized "okay, this is not gonna work out," I don't see the problem in him cutting his losses. If there's no chance of a relationship, if there's not …
/r/MensRights11/09/19 12:25 PM
3

I mean, am I the only one who thinks that bringing someone to your place doesn't necessarily mean to have sex? This is correct. It could mean making out. It could mean more intimate conversation in a private setting. It can mean any number of private activities, and there is the hint of sex regardless. And so on. But to the feminist it can only mean: "YOU GONNA GET RAAAAAPED, MUWAHAHAHA!" Or let's go out on a limb here and let our imaginations go completely hog wild. Let's say they went back to …
/r/MensRights11/09/19 06:39 AM
7

Sure, the guy was petty. But not many people died as a result. I really do have trouble working up your level of disgust, though. I'm afraid I don't date, sparky; I've been married for a decade and a half but I do get a sick kick out of seeing the single ladies huff and puff about the nightmare of paying for an appetizer.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 03:41 AM
5

I ask my mates out to the bar and such all the time but never once did they assume I'm going to pay for them unless we discus it beforehand. Yes, but they're men though! Men pay for stuff! It is the order of things! So it is written in the ancient scrolls!
/r/MensRights11/09/19 03:28 AM
8

Dating is not a place to seek revenge against womankind. Nope, it's a place to pay for a woman's coconut shrimp and margaritas. Certainly not to start relationships. I don't know who created this "you ask, you pay" rule you keep citing. It's hardly a goddamned law. If you were to go on a date in Hong Kong with a Chinese woman, it'd be standard for her to pay half no matter who asked who. That's standard in that culture. It's hardly an outrageous imposition.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 03:24 AM
11

it was retaliation Something about turnabout and fair play, blah blah. 'How do you know who asked the other out in that case? Maybe she asked him out?' blah blah. Sorry, I'll get back in line: How dare men not give their money away upon a woman's request. Women should expect to get stuff for free upon demand all the time. Dirty pool for not following the old-timey rules which a woman rejects for herself! Dirty pool! What one does not do is to play gender games on a date. Nope, that's for the wom…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 02:45 AM
14

In a fully-feminist board game, the female players would be allowed to keep rolling the dice until a double-six came up. "But don't worry, if men play their cards right, they can make more money too." But wouldn't that be horribly sexist, though? If men were allowed to win, that would only reinforce patriarchy or whatever fucka-ma-deelybob it is. But no worries -- mainstays such as jail, luxury taxes and chance cards are still included. Taxes and jail- for men! Chance cards- for women! But only …
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:32 PM
6

Despite all the consequences, men are still adapting to this new work environment and yet women are still complaining about it when they themselves created this atmosphere. "BECAUSE THEY STILL DON'T HAVE EQUALITY, WHATEVER THAT IS SUPPOSED TO MEAN!!!! REEEEEE!!!!!"
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:51 AM
2

am victim to “internalized misogyny” In other situations, that kind of thing usually gets called "disagreement." Feminism has plenty of other terms for disagreement, too: "backlash," "not getting it," "intellectual harassment"...
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:34 AM
1

Well, yeah, I'm not thinking about toddlers in adult bodies. You're right.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 03:26 AM
5

That assumption would work out for the younger generations, I imagine. A decent point and that did enter my mind. It is way too common for someone to be hardworking while barely making ends meet. But that's not the kind of man women are envisioning when they spin their little "have it all" fantasies. An ambitious, educated, hardworking career-oriented man holding an empty cardboard box is worth the cardboard box to such women. As the article says.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:44 AM
5

If the gal loves money, it only makes perfect sense!
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:31 AM
17

We should be grateful for this honesty. Usually they try to hide "high income" under words like "education" or "hard-working" or "ambitious" or "career-oriented" and bemoan the lack of educated, hard-working, ambitious, career-oriented men. Yes yes, the money is but an irrelevance. Because an educated, ambitious, hard-working, career-oriented man might also be a penniless man, or so we might intuitively assume!
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:27 AM
4

for them not to be a fucking psycho "MISOGYNIST!"
/r/MensRights06/09/19 12:59 PM
17

Literally cause and effect in play here... you can't ask for men to give up wages and jobs, then turn around and expect them to be rich enough to pay for you as well... Ohh yes, that's exactly what they expect. "Earn as much as a man, except my husband will be fuckin' rich." That's their Holy Grail.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 10:19 AM
16

YOU'RE NOT ENTITLED TO PRIVATE LUNCHES, TWIT.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 08:02 AM
192

Golly, but I thought women weren't into dudes with money? That's slanderous, suggesting that a lot of women are materialistic.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 02:38 AM
6

No. By the female-approved definition, 'sexism' doesn't include anything a woman does.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 11:13 PM
13

"sir are you not embarrassed??!" I've read this a few times and I don't know what this twat's insult is supposed to mean. It makes sense only to herself.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 07:35 AM
3

Well, throwing "small dick" at someone isn't exactly a taboo act within the feminist milieu.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 11:44 PM
1

Ahh, those were heady days. I would've had my stoning arm all warmed-up, too.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 06:29 AM
2

You're right about that. Sadly. Good job keeping your hands on the steering wheel.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 01:52 AM
4

If boys are equally forbidden to wear bras on the outside of their bare-midriff mini-tees which say FCUK ME and micro-shorts which have JUICY emblazoned across the bum, I don't see the problem.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 01:50 AM
56

Thanks, feminism!
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:03 PM
3

Heh. In a similar vein, it is often impolitic to note that the original Barbie doll had a more "realistic" body type. Mattel modified it and made it "unrealistic" in response to girls' play preferences and, shock horror, they demanded the curvier doll. But to hear people talking about it, it was a plot by evil toy tycoons to give girls a poor body image.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 11:37 AM
2

but I don't think there's any evidence of a more explicit quid-pro-quo. Short of a signed confession, I don't know how'd you'd get that.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 11:28 AM
3

Sometimes I think these people can't really tell the difference between entertainment and real life. Entertainment is what people watch for enjoyment, to escape real life. No one in their right mind watches Superman and tries to fly by jumping off a building. I loved watching Loony Tunes, yet I don't go-around dropping pianos full of dynamite on people's heads for some reason. The reason why entertainment is interesting is that it isn't real life. If we were thrilled by real life, we'd just go a…
/r/MensRights31/08/19 02:39 AM
1

No, but the laws of physics had better change. They'd better change, dammit!
/r/MensRights31/08/19 02:35 AM
2

You didn't get the message that the men were going to oppress you and keep you out, huh? Don't worry, the feminists are on hand to explain how you totally couldn't do what you ended up doing.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 02:34 AM
1

Yeah, people could die if standards were lowered!
/r/MensRights31/08/19 02:32 AM
2

Pah, like you really need to know anything about concrete in order to put up a good dam. P'shaw! Just slap some bullshit together, that's what men do when they're not pinching secretaries' asses all day and watching money drop out of the sky. There's one kind of dam for men and another kind of dam for women, and the women's kind will be a trillion times better once they spend 40 minutes drawing up a blueprint. And the patriarchy hasn't allowed them to do draw-up such a blueprint up until now bec…
/r/MensRights31/08/19 02:27 AM
2

Well, the short term gains of "doing women a special little favor, hee hee" looks more important to some. Your concern about sending all the wrong messages is but a small price to pay as far as they are concerned. As long as the treats can be grabbed right now and lots of shiny gifties can be handed out to the right clique, never mind what happens 2 weeks down the road.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 02:25 AM
2

The hope that everything will somehow work out when toxic males have been removed from the profession does not convince me. That seems to be the most obvious solution for every gender problem in the workplace, though. You can't have mehnz annoyingly succeeding if there ain't no mehnz around! (taps noggin)
/r/MensRights31/08/19 02:20 AM
1

They're handing-out a hand-up to the right people! Men (sneer, spit!) already get everything for free, they get all the handouts already due to their infinite Male Privilege Toybox, so women have to get everything for free. It wouldn't be fair and equal otherwise.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 02:17 AM
3

Exactly. You're either supposed to applaud it and hail its outcome, or politely pretend that there can be no downsides. You must either praise it or play dumb about it, there is no other acceptable reaction. This is what happens when you regard jobs and degrees as gifts rather than functions and "qualifications" as a euphemism for "favoring men.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 02:14 AM
6

It sure must take a lot of intelligence to point out that a white character is, in fact, white. They must all be geniuses.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:59 AM
1

I don't think that's necessarily the case; some clear instances of hate crimes were pretty much what you described. The whole point of federal or state hate crimes was because sometimes local police weren't doing their jobs when it came to certain types of murders. If you haven't you should see the film Mississippi Burning for a good cinematic illustration. Gene Hackman plays a real badass in that one.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:53 AM
3

I dunno. When Suicide Squad came out, some people were debating whether Harley Quinn is a feminist role model. The fact that she isn't a role model, she's both a psychotic sadist and a victim of Joker's abuse seemed to be lost.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:50 AM
2

The Wikipedia entry should be considered a bit suspect; it has been a major target of tireless feminist revisionism. If that's your primary source, I suggest you broaden the search a bit. A lot of mainstream media reporting was quite lazy, taking the gaming media's self-interested perspective at face value. Ever see the Kurosawa film Rashomon in which every participant in the fight tells a different version of what happened and they all had their own reason to lie? It's like that.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:26 AM
3

I'm fairly certain the accusation wasn't a false one. She was sleeping with a journalist who offered positive reviews of her mediocre work in his publication in exchange for sexual favors. A lot of the "gaming journalists" are poorly paid and cut corners in how they work, so it's not hard to believe.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:25 AM
1

I hope those paintings were thrown into wood chippers! It would send the wrong message if they were simply hung elsewhere.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 03:48 AM
1

"What is up with the dude wall?" Yeah, why the hell would anyone have their picture on a wall? Crazy! Maybe we should spray paint naked boobs on the pictures so that everyone will feel more comfortable?
/r/MensRights30/08/19 03:45 AM
17

Well, see, the way my sick mind works is: if people call you a monster, and they keep calling you a monster no matter what you say or do, then you might as well start acting like one. Then, at least you'll deserve it and perhaps you can gain a bit of notoriety instead of having it be a bum rap. It's a slight variation. If the choice is being feared as a bona-fide monster or being forced to constantly apologize for doing monstrous shit you didn't do, one seems preferable.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 03:39 AM
13

Oh she "heard" it, did she? Well, that must make it officially true.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 03:37 AM
1

♫♩♪ "Don't care, got mine, la la la..." ♪♫♩
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:38 PM
1

She claims to have an imaginary penis and that it is a girl's penis. Let that sink in. This is what happens when you give a young woman gigantic amounts of money and no one ever says anything like "you're an idiot" to her.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 11:10 AM
3

Well, everyone knows that 11 year old boys are ninjas.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 06:37 AM
3

Yes but did they WIN, though? That's what matters. Women getting their sinecures and their junkets and their trophies and their easy promotions. They deserve half of the seats at the table that they didn't lift a finger to build and half of the yummy cake that they didn't bake. That's the truly important thing, every other consideration can go to hell.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 06:03 AM
13

How monumentally pathetic would you feel knowing that you got into accepted into a programme, through a system used to help persons with disadvantages and illnesses?!? "Don't care, got mine."
/r/MensRights29/08/19 04:36 AM
3

Oh, but of course. You're using their knife at them. You're not supposed to do that. That's THEIR knife, only they can use it. It's almost like a black man wanting to use a white man's bathroom, ha ha ha, isn't that idea horrible and silly. I mean, really, when they describe what "toxic masculinity" means, it's partially sort of a banality: too much of anything can bad for you? Going to extremes can create problems? Oh, wow, brilliant. That idea totally isn't thousands of years old, is it? "Too …
/r/MensRights29/08/19 04:28 AM
2

Like a boss. "That's gold, Jerry! GOLD!"
/r/MensRights29/08/19 03:02 AM
1

anybody based on a single one of their beliefs is a surefire way of closing your mind. How open minded. How do you feel about Scientologists?
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:59 AM
3

It appears that in academic studies... One thing to note: the term didn't seem to originate among academic feminists. It seems to have originated from online groups and became picked-up by academic feminists, rather than the other way around. It is as if "academic feminists" just vacuum-up whatever sounds good and arrange analysis around a prefab conclusion, which is the exact opposite of the rest of scholarship. In any other analytical field, try that without getting an F. And, when you ask the…
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:48 AM
3

She's already taking some, but it's the wrong kind. So that's 2 categories of brain problems already. If you were to open up that skull, you'd only find a bunch of sparking wires, marshmallow fluff and a dead Mexican fruit-bat.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:43 AM
3

Here's some advice chum: when a women tells you she's a feminist, you should believe her and start looking for the exit. You don't want to find out how much hyper-insanity she is truly capable of.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:40 AM
2

This chick sounds completely, widely insufferable. But that has nothing to do with it. She's a simple person really: all she wants is 350% of everything a man can give.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:38 AM
3

Man-hating and dick-riding: the contradictory values of that camp. Always fuck whoever you like, but never like whoever you fuck!
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:35 AM
3

Is this the one who flies to Dubai hotels and gets $20,000 a day so Kurdish businessmen can piss on her and watch her thrust cucumbers up her own butt? It's not my thing, but whatever floats her boat. The self-proclaimed feminist said, “Women have a lot of disadvantages in society, so let us have some fairness when it comes to money. Don’t make us split things.” Wow, spoken like a true feminist indeed! She's right you know. It's not fair that a billionaire has acquired a billion dollars by magic…
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:25 AM
3

Wow, how did those dudes get murdered?
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:24 AM
12

Are you saying their tofu-powered physiques aren't mighty? Surely, they could throw-up barricades of lightweight furniture on the streets in a jiffy. Turning-over cars might be asking a bit much, I admit.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:52 AM
5

A lady-wang is a female wiener. We usually call that a clitoris, genius. I’m a diva in only the most ridiculous ways — such as wanting to be pushed around in an adult baby stroller. Wow, she sounds like a real grown-up. But no pacifier, though? Think outside the box, darling. Don't be afraid to think big.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:46 AM
1

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 06:16 AM
2

Yes. Men have spent all eternity forcing women to stay in the kitchen, and men are evil bastards for having never allowed them in the kitchen. We've always been at war with EastAsia and despite being at war with EurAsia the chocolate rations are 5 grams, an increase from last week's 15 grams.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 11:13 PM
5

I never understand why women complain about doing the bare basics at home. It's far too burdensome and it's outrageous to expect a woman to fulfill any kind of traditional role. Meanwhile, working 60 hours a week under a lousy boss who doesn't care if you're sick is liberation, which is why husbands are lazy bastards for wanting to take Sundays off. If your home alone all day with supposedly nothing to do, how can you not be doing this stuff? Even by accident. Oh, that's easy! Just let stuff pil…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 11:06 PM
2

I don't think you can steal either of those things. The term is normally "cultural borrowing" or "cultural syncretism." Until the brilliant term "cultural appropriation" came along, and then it became racist to eat chalupas and watch foreign films. Or something. It's so hard to keep track.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 11:04 PM
3

Women also, traditionally, had to dip candles to make lightning before that glorious lore was silenced by dastardly patriarchal whale oil lamps and dastardly-ier patriarchal electricity. If she wishes to return to that fabulous past, she'd better roll up her sleeves and get to work already. 60 hours of dipping strings into smelly tallow will get you 6 months of lighting! Chop chop! Make it snappy!
/r/MensRights18/08/19 10:59 PM
3

Well, I'm obviously not referring to the behavior of medieval knights, just what gets called that in the current day. And when I talk about going to a barbershop, I don't mean I expect to get a good bloodletting out of certain arteries to balance my humors. Rather, I plan on getting my hair cut.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 05:18 AM
5

Well, whatevs. One of the funny discontinuities of the original article was the extent to which the strippers were offended by being labelled "prostitutes." They were very very adamant that no sex was traded for money and what a dastardly insult it is to suggest that there was some sort of unsavory prostitution going on. Because drugging people and stealing their money and shaking your ass in a seedy bar is good, clean fun but to use the word "prostitute"??? Calumny! Slander! Fie! Fie!!! Punchin…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 04:35 AM
8

No argument from me, I'm simply trying to anticipate the Hollywood story that's going to produced for the big screen. As you can see in the trailer, the men are going to be assholes who work in finance. They're going to be the real thieves, you see. They're the real criminals who sorely deserve punishment. By vigilantes who flash their titties and steal money For The Downtrodden Single Moms.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 04:22 AM
10

If you read the article that the movie is supposedly based upon, it is really a neutral report of, basically, strippers who lie their asses off, drug unsuspecting people and steal shit. And, importantly, how they jumped through elaborate hoops of rationalizations and self-delusions to do it with a clean conscience. I think it's notable that they weren't exactly smart about their scams; they seemed to lack discipline and it was just a bunch of short-term cash grabbing from, say, well-to-do doctor…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 04:12 AM
14

Heh. Some years ago, a female acquaintance on campus asked me to escort her to her car one night. I refused because, frankly, I was at the beginning stage of rebelling against chivalry. I told her that she shouldn't live her life in fear. Needless to say, she wasn't happy about my "asshole" response and went-off on a resentful little jag about men don't know how it feels to be under threat, etc etc. I rather enjoyed watching her huff and puff. Yes, I'm a mean asshole for not being her unpaid val…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 03:55 AM
2

I noticed something like that a very long time ago. They wish for rape to simultaneously include things like unenthusiastic sex, or being pressured into sex after one sip of vodka, but also have that be treated as the most serious kind of assault. The insanity gets revealed when you look at the dividing line between sex and rape: Brownmiller says that rape is a crime of violence in which the penis is just the choice of weapon-- this is foundational to the feminist view of rape-- but when a coupl…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 01:44 AM
1

Heh. Reminds me of one episode of Dobie Gillis where his beatnik friend, Krebs, announced something like: "I'm gonna go travel the world! I wanna see all the great cities: London! Paris! Duluth!"
/r/MensRights18/08/19 01:29 AM
0

Are you prejudiced against the other 764 genders? Why aren't you mentioning them, you binary-ist fascist?
/r/MensRights17/08/19 01:20 PM
6

We want them to be free to express their full range of emotions without fear of being ridiculed. LIAR. Go drink out of your fuckin' MALE TEARS mug.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 10:29 PM
2

"And if a female criminal doesn't get arrested at all, it means that police don't respect her accomplishments in criminality, making her the biggest possible victim in the multiverse!111!!!11"
/r/MensRights15/08/19 12:22 AM
14

Well, look: fighting on behalf of women is a laudable pro-equality activity, the finest thing since sliced bread. Fighting on behalf of men, though, is a heinous atrocity which requires its mutant disease-bearers to be killed with fire and wiped from the face of the earth. By the way, the comic artist screwed up: the clueless misogynist dude needs to be wearing a Klan hood and burning a cross; perhaps eating a plate of poop as well.
/r/MensRights15/08/19 12:16 AM
2

It should be very easy to compete with a doll. Aren't feminists brilliant conversationalists, awesome in bed, perfectly reasonable, wonderful partners, etc etc? I keep hearing they're perfect human beings.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 10:49 PM
1

I like to think that people are intelligent enough to figure it out based on careful reading.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 10:45 PM
1

I am sarcastically repeating the feminist point of view, yes.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 02:33 AM
98

Unfair. One of those women has a Sicilian ancestor, so there's some African blood in her. Pfft. As if a room with 100% white girls isn't totally diverse already. Look, they even hired an Asian chick in the back! Math is tough. Seriously, what more diversity do you realistically expect from that crew?
/r/MensRights11/08/19 02:29 AM
6

Enlighten us, in that case.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 11:38 AM
1

I was quoting an actual argument I have seen feminists use. They are opposed to the recording of sexual encounters. Additionally, a number of states outlaw revenge porn and even in the absence of such laws I am 100% certain that I wouldn't use a recording for that purpose. It's the kind of thing that I would never think about doing because, frankly, I figure her brand of revenge-revenge porn could be worse. By the time you counter-retaliate with your revenge-revenge-revenge porn, the law of decr…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 03:27 AM
23

Oh, of course. Reporting a dude for sexual harassment should result in instant punishment, no questions asked. In fact a woman should be able to do it anonymously, on a postcard, against anyone she wants. Anything less would dissuade victims from coming forward and reporting more men. For lesbian bosses accused of sexual harassment, on the other hand, certain procedures must be followed to sort-out what really happened. Misunderstandings and miscommunications and ambiguities can be rife after al…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 01:38 AM
1

I'm having a bit of coffee, my bare feet are petting the dog's back fuzz and I'm chuckling at you while waiting for the wife to get ready before we head out for a drive. Which one of us needs to relax and take a break?
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:11 AM
0

You sound like a moral titan, SketchyPornDude. Do you publish a monthly newsletter that I could subscribe to?
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:02 AM
2

there's no other option for men except to video record themselves to the last until one of the two leaves the place as there is no way for a man to prove the consent. "No. That could be used for revenge porn. Men should not be allowed to gather proof and just admit full guilt instead."
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:51 PM
2

"That's different."
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:51 PM
0

She sounds scared. Hee!
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:47 PM
1

In a narrow, technical sense you are correct that it is not in the Bill of Rights, but a popular consensus began to develop during the 18th and 19th century that education is a right, because you can't have a very good citizenry or society if people can't read, do math and so on. Benjamin Rush, one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, certainly argued it is a right but it was left up to states and localities to figure out; in the Northwest Ordinance (1787), new towns were required …
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:42 PM
5

One of the replies was from Abe Froman? The Sausage King of Chicago?
/r/MensRights05/08/19 12:36 PM
8

More like: Is there anything that isn't wrong with her?
/r/MensRights05/08/19 12:33 PM
1

Haha, I'd have flashed her a big grin, given a thumbs up sign and splayed my legs all the way out until my inner thighs felt like they were on fire. "Look at me! I'm toxically masculicious! Now I'll go man gaze with my sexist man-eyes while man-eating a manwich with my sexist man-teeth." Then, I like to watch the veins bulge and throb in their foreheads. ;)
/r/MensRights05/08/19 12:28 PM
3

No one argues whether they can, but for some reason these ingratiating "smart" pencilnecks haven't grasped that it's inherently lousy and heavy work, sometimes exposed to bad weather and physical injury, and it isn't entirely crazy for someone to not want to do it. Instead, they seem to think that there are millions of women out there who are totally smitten with the idea of running a steam roller over hot asphalt under the August sun, but the eeeeeevil cackling men won't allow them to submit a …
/r/MensRights04/08/19 09:15 AM
3

I heard an astronomer discovered that two bits of chocolate-covered popcorn were trapped in her gravity well and were orbiting around her. They were tentatively designated Porko A and Porko B but their unstable paths might cause them to gradually impact somewhere around her mouth.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 09:06 AM
2

Weird. According to all the feminism dogma she believes in, it should have been. It's society. It failed her by not delivering her Utopia on her Android phone. Yet again, society has failed her. She's owed Utopia, dammit. Just like how all men live in Utopia, she deserves that too so hand it over. You men are all evilly hiding all the Utopia stuff in your closets, right next to your giant Male Privilege toyboxes.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 12:23 PM
1

The way she wants power, she seems to think men have power in dating and women don't. Yes. Because men have to make the first moves and they have to spend all the money and basically do everything-- little insignificant stuff like that-- and society delivers men "power" which is nonetheless not fairly earned. But when she has to do something like send "hi" on an app, its sooo haaa-aaaa-aaaard and having this "power" doesn't seem to please her very much at all because society hasn't given her ful…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 12:15 PM
2

How do you respond to just "hi"? Are you supposed to say something clever and witty, like an actual pick up line the way you'd need to, exactly as if you were making the first move? Basically it's the same old shit, with women needing to choose who gets to do all the shit-work, it sounds like.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 12:09 PM
1

She's a strong modern woman, Hear Her Roar, but she does love wearing a bustle, petticoat and bedgown in a Victorian parlor when she's off-duty and offline.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 06:08 AM
18

No, she's willing to do some work... until it gets burdensome and the Strong Empowered Woman feels like having a Big Strong Man carry her around and pay for everything. In a feminist-approved way, of course! She's no hypocrite, after all. Just because she CAN do everything a man can do doesn't mean that she should HAVE to do everything a man can do. That's his job! She CAN pay for her half of dinner, but she shouldn't NEED to! It's her OPTION, not her OBLIGATION, see. Her OPTION. Her CHOICE. And…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 05:43 AM
6

There is a lot of projection in this article. She starts off saying how great the idea is, but how uncomfortable it is for her to live up to the grand idea, and men are the ones who are messing it all up for her anyway. Any negative reactions she got were probably reactions to her flaky judgyness. I remember, about maybe 10 years back, this one woman wrote a circulated list called something like "what the perfect feminist boyfriend would do." And one of the items on the list was "he doesn't hold…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 05:35 AM
12

I learned the hard way that despite our feminist advances, many men are still not comfortable waiting to be asked out. Funny. Up until that sentence it all sounded as if you weren't comfortable playing the male role because it was too troublesome for you do to everything in the way that men are supposed to. Which is "power" when it's men doing it. It's "power" when men run the show, but now you're running the show and its too burdensome for you, despite you being empowered and ready to rule the …
/r/MensRights02/08/19 04:55 AM
6

Motorized dildos are still great, in contrast.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 01:12 AM
2

I thought I was the only one who remembered that movie.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:47 PM
1

If you actually do win new customers, it could possibly be a winning strategy. No, don't you see? By losing all of their customers, they're going to capture the biggest market share! Crazy like a fox!
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:46 PM
1

Nobody ever claimed that brokers are correct 100% of the time.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:44 PM
11

She won because she was paid. I hope she's smart enough to leave that victory out of the project portfolio she'll want to show to future clients. She isn't smart enough to do that, but I can certainly hope.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:59 PM
14

Hey, you gotta turn every defeat into a victory, turn that frown into a smile. You fall in the mud? Now you're wearing a new brown suit, friend! The customers who were alienated? Those were bad customers, good riddance to that rubbish. Gillette didn't want their filthy, dirty, backwards patriarchal money anyway. That's not the future. No no, the future is capturing the all-important "low testosterone/singular testicle" demographic. Some of them even have a few facial hairs! The marketing researc…
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:44 PM
45

What I find so incredible about the creator of that ad campaign is that she brags about "the message" that she was spreading. How important it was for her to "spread the message," that was her giant win. That was her big accomplishment. Not "promote the brand I was hired to promote," not "increase my client's sales" or anything greedy or corporate like that, but to spread an unrelated message that had fuck all to do with shaving and, apparently, insulted part of the intended audience. Okay miss,…
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:39 PM
46

Aaaahaahaahaaa... pathetic boss thinks fewer sales means more sales, losing is the path to coming in first. Aaaahaahaahaaahaaa... Yes yes, it wasn't a fuck-up, it was all part of a brilliant rope-a-dope strategy where you attain victory by falling on your face. "We meant to do that!" Haahaa... "See? I'm bleeding from a thousand wounds-- that means I won!"
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:31 PM
2

I think I might've worded it confusingly the first time around.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:18 PM
3

In a different part of her brain, yes, she believes that. She believes both, when needed. It is a hallmark of the ideological fanatic, Orwell's doublethink in action. The Marxist in her believes that employers always hire exploit their workers while the feminist in her also believes that employers discriminate if they're unwilling to exploit hire women as workers. The result is that she absolutely demands that capitalists start exploiting women workers immediately because it's unfair to not expl…
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:10 PM
4

Not to mention the tiny number of Belgians who were required to run slave labor camps across the giant Congo basin. The vast Aztec and Inca Empires would be similarly pleased to hear that they weren't smashed and enslaved by a few hundred armored conquistadores using horses and gunpowder.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:05 PM
3

You're using facts and logic. Those are useless whenever a feminist is spouting-off her memorized slogans.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:01 PM
3

there's no fucking way a minority can systematically oppress a majority. Apartheid South Africa called. They said "oh yes we fucking can, ya moron."
/r/MensRights01/08/19 11:58 AM
17

P&G’s shares rose nearly 5% to a record high of $121.76 on Tuesday, My broker suggested yesterday that I sell. And I did, that stock's P/E ratio is pretty damn out of whack and the stock price was up something like 25% from the beginning of the year. You buy low and you sell high; it was pretty damn high yesterday. Edit: My wording was probably confusing. It was $91/share in January; Yahoo finance has the info.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 08:32 AM
1

he fell into arrears after the court increased his payments to $3,242 per month in 2013 when it was learned that he had a higher income than reported. Dammit, the ex-wife totally deserved way more than that! Every cent he made is what she rightfully needed! And the lesson here is: After you divorce, go into the underground economy and operate on a cash and/or barter-only basis. The ex-wife is going to demand her rightful cut of whatever it is you're doing, you walking ATM you, so why not do it a…
/r/MensRights31/07/19 08:46 AM
6

I remember when Katie's book came out in the early 90s. Feminist reviewers closed ranks to attack her every which way. She was basically the devil.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 04:41 AM
1

cultural appropriation Oh, that's my favorite kind of nonsense. In other spheres, it gets called "cultural borrowing" or "cultural syncretism" or even "learning from other cultures." Which is what successful cultures do, as I write these words using an alphabet which I appropriated from the Romans, who appropriated it from the Cumaen Greeks, who appropriated it from the Phoenicians. Sometimes, I still wonder if it's racist for me to eat a burrito or if it's racist for me to not eat a burrito.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 02:26 AM
10

I've seen utterly bewildering feminist arguments which say that the wedding ring is, symbolically, victimizing the woman who wears it. Because it implies such and such a meaning which far, faaaar outweighs whatever thousands of dollars a man might've been obligated to spend. Of course, it's so obvious that non-tangible symbolism inflicts a far larger victimization upon the woman who doesn't even need to accept it if she doesn't want to, can't you see how that works? Naturally, if you were to ask…
/r/MensRights27/07/19 10:09 AM
4

Why is the female Thor white? Shouldn't she be a POC?
/r/MensRights27/07/19 03:06 AM
2

Well, yes, humiliating people is the point. Forcing people to sit in ways which crushes their genitals is the point. This is why feminists scream that you're lying when you say that men sit that way to avoid crushing their testicles: they want to force you to do exactly that.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 03:05 AM
1

Are you making this up? I don't see how "yes means yes" means what you're saying she says it does.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 07:52 AM
2

Hating patriarchy is the theory. Punishing the nearest man is the practice.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 01:28 AM
2

If that was his point, he went about making it in a needlessly destructive and self-promoting way.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:33 PM
9

Women can't be rapists, silly. It's in the textbook.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 09:19 PM
259

See that? He was born a rapist. Every man's a rapist, he just hasn't been accused yet.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 12:01 PM
3

I'm looking forward to seeing how this goes.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 01:42 AM
1

She started her schtick well before #MeToo; it's only gotten more shrill.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 09:28 AM
2

I can't see that an environment where men are offered that important benefit and women aren't, is a good thing. What Sandberg is agitating for is something that goes beyond wishing to rectify that sort of situation. For a long time now, she has basically been saying that men in positions of leadership ought to prioritize promoting women because this is something that she believes women are owed by men and men ought to do it because it is immoral and unfair for them to not prioritize this. That's…
/r/MensRights22/07/19 07:36 AM
1

Well, I don't know if this woman is explicitly calling this a feminist project.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 06:00 AM
3

Maybe someone can clue me in as to why the women's chair forces women to spread? Is the creator OK with other women spreading into her personal space? I know what her game is, I'd just like to see someone say it in a way that doesn't use the words that I'd choose.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 05:59 AM
11

That does sound like their brand of fake "equality," yes.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 01:28 AM
1

Where do they find the time to watch TV?
/r/MensRights22/07/19 12:16 AM
1

Is that why women watch more daytime TV than any other demographic?
/r/MensRights22/07/19 12:02 AM
3

Sandberg is demanding something above and beyond women merely being managed. She wants men to work extra hard to elevate women into positions of leadership. Rather a different expectation. She thinks this because she thinks that men, as a group, collectively owe women something. And, no, you're not entitled to that special dispensation. You ought to get managed the same as everyone else.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 09:56 PM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 08:08 AM
18

if you hug somebody and somebody ELSE is offended by the hug which doesn’t affect them, YOU can get fired Why, that makes perfect sense. Also, if you're driving your car down the street, and a pedestrian thinks there should be a STOP sign on the corner, you should get a ticket for not stopping at the imaginary sign.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 03:14 AM
5

Heh. Guns don't kill people. People do, with guns!
/r/MensRights21/07/19 03:10 AM
18

Something makes me think that she isn't all that smart on this topic. One problem in mentoring programs is: there isn't an awful lot of benefit for the mentors. Maybe a little benefit, but it's not much. This is why mentors are often given incentives. But our friend Shoyl here doesn't seem to talk about incentives for male mentors, she just points fingers and hollers names at them. Or maybe she does acknowledge the position that the mentors are in somewhere in her writings, but I'm not going to …
/r/MensRights21/07/19 02:04 AM
25

The more I see this woman's hectoring, the more nauseating it looks. Just see this laughable little whine: “If they are reluctant even to meet one-on-one with women, there’s no way women can get an equal shot at proving themselves.” Too fucking bad, isn't it? You wanna go have a good cry? Maybe yell "misogyny" a bit more? That's always worked really well until now, why not keep it up? “Senior men right now are nine times more hesitant to travel with a woman and six times more likely to hesitate …
/r/MensRights21/07/19 01:42 AM
30

They don't get this. They cannot demand to have only profitable interactions, they cannot realistically demand to have workplaces which are only easy and comfortable and convenient, they cannot demand that only handsome, rich men can look at them in public, they cannot demand that women be outfitted with little hidden nukes while also demanding that men act as if the little nukes are irrelevant. If you wanna wave your little gun around, go ahead, but it's a bit moronic to be shocked when people …
/r/MensRights21/07/19 01:40 AM
66

“It’s not enough to not harass us, you need to not ignore us, either.” You are not entitled to our attention.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 01:08 AM
1

Prison labor, after the abolition of slavery in the US south, was a substitute for slavery. Chain gangs were a thing. Someone who grew up in a town with a prison (Attica in NY, I think) told me about how it was common to see teams of dudes in orange jumpsuits doing yardwork or picking up trash on the side of the road under the watchful eye of a warden (conditions in Attica were bad, in '71 the prisoners forcefully rebelled and took over that facility in a nationally-covered incident; the full st…
/r/MensRights20/07/19 02:03 AM
24

Voluntary workplace death: The latest craze! Go die in a refinery fire today! You'll love it!
/r/MensRights19/07/19 11:02 AM
4

And she likes to put her feet up.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 04:43 AM
1

You should probably spend that time learning to write better.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 04:07 AM
1

You said "no" in response to "You don't see a problem with the message of saying that men shouldn't be masculine because it's toxic to be a man." You don't see a problem. Exactly. You don't. Thanks for confirming my point there. Oh wait-- were you simply being a sloppy writer again? It's so hard to tell with you.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 04:04 AM
1

If used to say that all men are toxic. I don't think that statement would bother you at all.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 04:01 AM
1

Hahaa, good. It's "I know you are but what am I?" now. Wonderful. Simply wonderful. Hahaa..
/r/MensRights19/07/19 03:59 AM
1

No? Oh, so you don't see a problem with it. Which is what I said at the start.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 03:57 AM
1

Until this post you had no reason to assume I personally in any participated &/or encouraged &/or liked the shaming of men for crying. Just a hunch. You seem like the performative bullshit type of feminist.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 03:56 AM
1

Nah, I just enjoy watching you sputter. I think it's gonna be my new hobby from now on.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 03:54 AM
1

Oh, and do you approve of the message that it's toxic to be a man? I know you didn't say it, but you don't see a problem with it? Yeah? Am I right?
/r/MensRights19/07/19 03:53 AM
1

But is it toxic to tell men to not be masculine?
/r/MensRights19/07/19 03:52 AM
1

hypocrisy You don't know what that word means, I don't think ;)
/r/MensRights19/07/19 03:51 AM
1

Lacked the discipline to keep up in school, did you? Go on, you can admit it.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 03:50 AM
1

is called nuance Not the way you've been using those words. I don't think you understand some of the big words that you use. Nope. Well, you sure as hell can't write very well. If you write the way you speak, you speak like an idiot. And it probably shows in real life. Is that why people act "toxic" towards you, do you think? Yes, I read that. You don't like my condescending attitude. Condescension is a normal reaction to idiocy, though. If a lot of people act condescending towards you, maybe yo…
/r/MensRights19/07/19 03:42 AM
1

Instead, men shouldn't be masculine because it's toxic to be a man. It sounds like you're being pretty toxic yourself, what with your prescriptive ideas of how men should and should not act. But you DO approve of that message, yes? You didn't say it but you approve of it. Yes? Of course you do. You think men shouldn't be masculine because it's toxic to be a man. There's no way you can avoid that idea because you have been dancing around it all of this time and you can't think of an argument agai…
/r/MensRights19/07/19 03:36 AM
1

So what do you think of those "male tears" mugs that are for sale on certain feminist websites? Funny, yeah? Really funny? It's really pathetic and disgusting when men cry, isn't it? Isn't it odd that for all the posturing about "it's okay for men to cry" you still find the idea cringe-inducing on a gut level? Almost as if Team Feminism is just a pack of hypocrites.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 12:01 AM
1

It's close enough to what you believe. But I didn't fill up my statement with unnecessary filler, flab and unneeded padding as you so often do in what resembles an attempt to sound more intelligent and authoritative than you really are. That's probably how you wrote your college papers, though. But you're a poor writer, aren't you? You struggled with essays for a long time? Your teachers might have mentioned that to you on a few occasions, yeah? Does that sound familiar to you when I say you're …
/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:11 PM
1

Can you? I bet you can't. Am I wrong? Go ahead, when would that term be hate speech? You can't come up with anything, can you? If you can't, then I think you shouldn't have objected when I said you think the term cannot be used as hate speech in any context. Unlike "toxic femininity" which could be easily used as hate speech, according to you. I'm surely correct about this, but you simply don't like hearing it from me. If you can't produce an answer, then how is it a baseless claim when I say yo…
/r/MensRights18/07/19 01:43 PM
1

So telling men not to be masculine is ok-- because it's toxic to be a man. That's a healthy message, yeah? You surely approve of that message.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 01:41 PM
1

I'm glad we agree on pretty much everything! How wonderful. Boy, men sure are evil fuckers aren't they.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 01:36 PM
3

I needed that, haahaa....
/r/MensRights18/07/19 08:48 AM
4

Sure, we can put a female-identifying cisgendered human on the moon, but what about the other 1,754 genders?
/r/MensRights18/07/19 07:58 AM
6

That is harsh. He and I are just having a discussion.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 07:40 AM
7

She wrote it? Oh, of course. She knows all about space exploration. She's practically an expert, I bet. She saw the whole Star Wars series.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 07:39 AM
2

It depends on how long a view you want to take. I will say that spaceflight is a lot less experimental now. Space tourism is a thing. See, when you said "civilian" my memory failed to jog properly. But you're right. Also, Sally Ride came before. And Valentina Tereshkova, as a media ploy (Russia didn't have another female cosmonaut until the 90s).
/r/MensRights18/07/19 07:32 AM
2

Let's see if I can guess a few more things that you'd agree with? Just to recap: "There is no masculinity without toxicity, just gender-neutral stuff." BAM! I scored a direct hit there, yeah? You're nodding along with me now, I assume? Oh good. I feel like we're close friends. We know each other's thoughts. Or: "One major difference between men and women is that men are toxic." Oh, I bet you agree with that one! Did I hit the nail on the head? Do I get a thumbs up? I bet I do. Oh you totally agr…
/r/MensRights18/07/19 07:31 AM
1

No need to dilute what you really believe. Don't be afraid. I didn't say "all men are toxic" I said "there is no masculinity, only toxins." You can say it, it's what you really think. No need to beat around the bush about it.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 03:49 AM
1

You probably can't conceive of a way in which it would be hate speech when you use it.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 03:48 AM
1

Remove "toxins" from masculinity and there's basically nothing left. Yeah? Just neutral stuff.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 03:47 AM
3

Oh, knock off this obfuscation. You-- not "society"-- think there is no masculinity except for the toxic kind. Once you remove the toxic bits, you (not "society") think there is nothing but gender neutral stuff left over. Masculinity is toxicity and there's no masculinity left when you take out the toxic parts. "There is no masculinity, only toxins." That's a far more succinct way of putting it. There is no need to bother with all this rubbish about what "society" says or put in useless gibberis…
/r/MensRights18/07/19 03:08 AM
1

But "toxic masculinity" cannot be used as hate speech in any context, though. Right? It's always OK to use that term, yes? Nothing hateful about it? You can throw it around and it's never ever hateful.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:46 AM
2

Ahh, there we go: there is no masculinity apart from the toxic kind. There we go. I knew that was the core of your beliefs. Maybe you should say that directly, straight up front, instead of piling-on all this useless verbal flab. There is no masculinity, only toxins. Say it loud and proud, chum.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:37 AM
1

"in more'r'less equal amounts" you said. You had to screw-up the writing. Because you can't say it without trying to mess it up in some way, hahaaa... you are hilarious. You are SO goddamned funny.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:33 AM
1

So they are not responsible, SOCIETY is responsible. SOCIETY does it. Impersonal SOCIETY. Genderless SOCIETY. Women are but society's puppets, yes? Society speaks through women but women play no role in that. Yes? Right? Women play no role, it's SOCIETY which plays the role. You say it's the fault of "society" to avoid saying women have any fault. You twist and squirm to avoid saying that. You're so hilariously predictable, haahaa...
/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:29 AM
2

Oh, Christa McAuliffe. Yes, civilian. Ok. That was the 80s, I'm talking early space exploration.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:11 AM
9

Wasn't the first civilian we tried shooting into space a woman? Not that I am aware. But there isn't really an acknowledgement that space exploration in its early days was dangerous and that people died in astronaut training. Yuri Gagarin almost died during reentry. If women had been used as astronauts early on, and one of them died (like Gus Grissom or the nameless Soviet technicians who died in covered-up rocket explosions), we'd hear the complaint that female life was unimportant.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 02:01 AM
1

You think it's impossible?
/r/MensRights18/07/19 01:56 AM
1

I've never seen such people That's too bad. That's really too bad. I have. Feminists in good standing who'd call men fucking crybabies for expressing their emotions. Men and their disgusting crybaby emotions. You'd probably manage to fit right in with them, though. You'd find a way to nod right along with them, I think. You'd forgive them for that behavior pretty quickly. They're progressive, you know! They're the most fair-minded people on earth!
/r/MensRights18/07/19 01:49 AM
2

And non toxic masculinity, though? Are there any non-toxic forms of masculinity that aren't gender-neutral? I bet you can't think of any. What, "strength"? Women can't be strong too? "Confidence"? Women can't be confident also? C'mon, you're supposed to be the expert! You're supposed to know this stuff way better than me!
/r/MensRights18/07/19 12:20 AM
2

This is what this drooling schmendrick clearly believes. YES. Even when he repeats the sentence, he has to throw-in unneeded apostrophes to be all jokey and ironic because his brain won't accept it.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 12:18 AM
2

Yes. Did you throw up in your mouth as you typed that? Did you feel pain? It was a truly unpleasant thing to think, wasn't it? I'm sorry I use more accurate terms like society & culture, does it offend you that I don't always explicitly call out women for creating it? They're also vague, meaningless terms-- not more accurate-- if you use them in the way that you do. As anyone who ever actually studies "society" and "culture" would know. And you clearly don't. You're using "society" as a way to a…
/r/MensRights18/07/19 12:08 AM
1

That was your statement, not mine. It was YOU who thinks that "toxic femininity" can be hate speech, but "toxic masculinity" is a term which is fine for all contexts. Yeah? Right?
/r/MensRights18/07/19 12:07 AM
2

But confidence, strength and outgoingness can also appear in women without being "masculinity," yes? Those are gender neutral traits, are they not? So there really are no "masculine" traits when you've removed the toxic bits. Right?
/r/MensRights18/07/19 12:05 AM
1

Now that I've goaded you into it, and you ironize the statement with apostrophes because your brain still won't accept it. Even when you repeat my words, you have to be jokey about it because your brain won't let you say them unironically. There's a chunk of your brain which refuses to say that sentence without trying to laugh it off.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 12:04 AM
1

Right WOMEN play no role in toxic masculinity, despite being half of this "SOCIETY" which causes it. And I find that brain dysfunction of yours to be risible.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 12:03 AM
1

So women's demands are actually SOCIETY'S demands. That is how you responded to that argument. Women don't help to create toxic masculinity, SOCIETY does. Do you have trouble saying "men help to create toxic masculinity?" No, certainly not. And yet, your mind struggles to parse "women help to create toxic masculinity." It's gibberish. It's gobbledygook to you. You can't bear to repeat that idea. Isn't that interesting? You bend over backwards to avoid thinking that forbidden idea. And, no, I'm n…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:38 PM
1

Yes, you responded by saying that women's demands on men are actually SOCIETY'S demands on men. So "society" makes toxic masculinity. You cannot say "women help to create toxic masculinity." You cannot say it. And I find that hilarious. Utterly, utterly hilarious that your brain just won't allow you to think in that way.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:20 PM
1

I think you really can't say it. I think your brain really really won't allow you to say it. Hah.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:16 PM
6

Okay, so you know "toxic masculinity." What do you call the tiny remainder of masculinity when you remove the toxic bits? "Non-toxic masculinity"? And what's left of masculinity after you've removed the toxic parts? Is there anything in the non-toxic masculinity that isn't also present in femininity? Because, if I may be so bold as to state my predictions: your non-toxic masculinity will be gender neutral. Am I right? Am I correct? That the non-toxic masculinity is not really "masculinity" in yo…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:05 PM
1

I'm starting to think I should use the term toxic femininity. Isn't that hate speech in certain contexts, though? Be careful with that.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:57 PM
2

How about boys raised by single moms? Do they ever pick up toxic masculinity from their moms? ...oops. Did you get a headache now? I just think it's funny that you can't say "women and men are both responisble for toxic masculinity." You can't say it. It's against your religion.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:54 PM
2

Maybe I enjoy getting under the skin of a louse? But you're right, it has become too easy to whack this blithering muppet.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 07:21 AM
3

Hey, I'm gonna bet that you can't say "women and men each bear equal responsibility for disseminating toxic masculinity." That sentence makes you cringe, doesn't it? Hah. That sentence truly bugs you, yes? I hope it annoys the hell out of you. The fact that your brain just won't accept that sentence. That wicked and sinful sentence? Your brain just struggles and wriggles to not accept it. It's soo goddamned annoying, that sentence? Makes you want to sneer in ridicule, yeah?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 06:45 AM
1

Men and women totally start with the same brain, except women are way smarter. And then they get raised differently and that causes the toxic masculamanatee to burrow inside men's brains! And women's totally smarter brains become morally superior, too! Who is responsible? Why men are! And society! Men and society! Society and men! Those are the culprits! Women are present-- they're burdened with raising their evil sons-- but they're nothing but ghostly 3-inch beings with zero impact on how that …
/r/MensRights17/07/19 06:30 AM
2

He's not gonna watch that stuff, are you crazy?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 06:21 AM
2

You're making just as much sense as our very concerned friend.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 06:14 AM
5

So what do you think about the feminists who like to call men "crybabies" and mock men for not being toxically stoic in the face of pain? Did "men" make the feminists do that? Did "toxic masculinity" make the feminists spread toxic masculinity? Or was it "society" pushing feminists around like passive, blameless puppets and talking through their passive, blameless mouths?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 06:05 AM
1

Heh. I just find it funny that you are incapable of saying "men and women create toxic masculinity." Instead you have to say "society." "Society" does it. Heh. Society. Yeah yeah. Tell me more about how "men" create it, and tell me how "society" creates it. And yet you ritually avoid saying something like "men and women create toxic masculinity." You are incapable of stringing those words together. Because it's misogynistic to say that women are half of society, Haahaa....
/r/MensRights17/07/19 05:18 AM
1

Yes it's "society" not "women". NEVER "women" but "society." Oh, but "men"? You can say that one. "Men" or "society." Never "men and women," but "men" or "society" create toxic masculinity. Never "women create half of toxic masculinity," never "men and women create toxic masculinity." You don't think, you regurgitate.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 04:50 AM
3

Of course, it can be hate speech, but "toxic masculinity" is just a neutral sociological term and men are stupid jerks for objecting to it! Right? That sounds just about right for you.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 04:47 AM
4

you've been nothing but a fucking asshole Tsk tsk! That's your toxic masculinity talking! See, there is a telling verbal tic that your type has: It's fine to say that men are the ones responsible for creating toxic masculinity, but as soon as anyone suggests that women might share more than zero percent of that responsibility, you change gears and say it's "society." It's society. Men and society. Never "women are half of society." For some reason, you can't say "women are half responsible for t…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 04:35 AM
6

Because just about all of mens' problems on a societal level trace (often very directly) back to toxic masculinity. I see! Fascinating. Oh my that's profound. And you reached this hard but factual conclusion from the opinioneering of your Gender Studies 101 textbook, no doubt. Most of the ones that can be said to be a result of womens' demands on men could also be said to be a result of society's demands on men, Ohh, society. I see! Hmm. Society does that. Ohh, Fascinating. That explains it. My …
/r/MensRights17/07/19 04:04 AM
2

I thought you wanted to have a discussion, eh? So what do you think? Should "toxic femininity" be considered hate speech? Some feminists certainly think so.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:46 AM
1

How can we talk about the term if you're not prepared to have a fixed meaning for the term?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:45 AM
1

Don't you get it? Toxic masculinity is the masculine stuff that's toxic! He can't make it any more succinct than that. He's the expert, you know!
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:30 AM
1

What portion of that is a direct result of female demands upon men, do you estimate? Zero percent?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:27 AM
1

The definition that you gave him isn't as precise as the one you gave me. The one you've giving him is a poorly-worded tautology. Toxic masculinity is the masculinity that's toxic. Bravo. Well done. Sorry- considered toxic. Considered by who? A passive voice construction is intended to obscure meaning, which is why you're using it here.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:19 AM
1

So they did do so as a result of toxic masculinity? But but but I thought women weren't socialized to act that way?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:18 AM
1

That's not entirely what you told me before. How can you ask us about our thoughts on a term if you are going to change the term's meaning for different people? "Considered to be toxic." Okay, what gets "considered" toxic varies from person to person, dunnit? So it's a subjective judgment. What's toxic for Jill isn't toxic in Jane's opinion.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:13 AM
2

Yeah, I was fairly aware from the get-go.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:51 AM
4

Hey, here's an interesting factoid: Karen Straughan was once going to give a talk at a college campus about "toxic femininity" a few years back and the feminist group on campus tried to kill the event because they said it was "hate speech." That's kind of an interesting reaction, innit? Your thoughts??
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:50 AM
3

Ahh, finally some candor. That would have been an excellent way to start things off. Because when you start off the way that you did, it gives the impression that you think we're just evil morons who badly need your corrections. Why must we use a concept that we find to be fatally flawed? We don't really think that it's a good term to use. Here's a great question for discussion: which parts of the eeevil "toxic masculinity" social construct are a direct result of women's demands upon men? None o…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:36 AM
3

Yeah-- Men expressing their feelings is men being fucking crybabies. Worse than toxically stoic. Wanna know where I get the phrase "fucking crybabies" from? From the feminist blogosphere. The same one which uses "toxic masculinity."
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:33 AM
2

I'd like to know what you know, in that case.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:32 AM
1

You agree that when a human without a penis acts a certain way, they didn't do so as a result of toxic masculinity. You, after all, know what social constructs they're being influenced by, and they're not being influenced by the toxically masculine construct. OK. So... maybe the teacher raped the kiddies out of loneliness instead?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:28 AM
6

You'll forgive me for getting the impression that you're being disingenuous with this statement.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:24 AM
1

So if a human with a penis acts a certain way, it's "toxic masculinity" but if a human without a penis acts in the same way, it ought to be regarded very differently. Perhaps even regarded as a good thing.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:22 AM
2

When people struggle with emotional issues because of stuff like "real men don't cry" it apparently has nothing to do with gender. I thought you were asking him for his thoughts? It looks to me as if you're trying to sarcastically correct his incorrect thoughts.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:11 AM
2

Shame on you! Surely this person isn't like that at all. Heavens to Betsy!
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:03 AM
1

I'm not certain that is the definition. Is it an inherent feature?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:00 AM
5

Ask "Can toxic masculinity appear in women?" and they will agree that it can. The behavior isn't inherent to men, according to them. Yet, when convenient, they act as if it is inherent.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:53 AM
3

There are only 3 apostrophes. And they're superfluous. As you bloody well knew at the time of typing them. What do you mean by that? What do I mean by that? I think it's pretty clear what I mean. What do you not comprehend?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:44 AM
7

Why not give it a try yourself? Asking them to describe non-toxic masculinity, I mean. I'd hate to deny you the opportunity to learn from your own experience.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:39 AM
7

I'm not sure what those excessive apostrophes are supposed to be about, but whatever. My thoughts? When you ask the people who love using that phrase (it came out of online discussions among the rank-and-file feminists and got adopted by feminist intellectuals rather than the other way around) to describe how they would envision non-toxic masculinity, they basically end up describing women. Or, at the very least, the "toxic" aspects of masculinity are those which are not subordinate to women's n…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:24 AM
4

You're using logic and reason. Stop it immediately or I shall be forced to take measures.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 10:25 PM
2

Stop demanding that realism intrude upon their victim-fetish fantasy world.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 08:41 AM
3

Thanks for the laugh. Upvoted. "Feminism is just* for equality† for everybody‡!" *There's a lot more to it than that †Excepting the most desirable fruits of traditional womanhood and the negative externalities dumped onto men. ‡Does not include everybody.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 08:33 AM
30

Feminism does include men. As baddies, yes. Feminism is obsessed with including men in their worldview as baddies. That's their primary role: baddie. Foil to all that is good and righteous. Everything else is ancillary to that.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 08:28 AM
1

You're still not good enough for her because your eyes aren't the right shade. Yours are cloudy cerulean, but her future man's eyes absolutely must be murky azure. She'll settle for nothing less!
/r/MensRights16/07/19 02:44 AM
15

One keeps rejecting guys over their voice being too high. At least she's aware of what's truly important in a partner.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 02:39 AM
13

That sounds just about par for the course. Have you ever asked her what percentage of men are over 6'5? And from that pool, what percentage are going to have high-paying jobs? And is she aware that a high-paying job often does not allow a fellow to spend a lot of time with his kids while mommy plays iPad games and drinks appletinis by the pool all day long? The numbers are not in her favor. And even if they were in her favor, what makes her deserving of a living god? Because that's what she's de…
/r/MensRights16/07/19 02:16 AM
11

Okay, so seek a partnership with the kind of man who is willing to share your traditional chores. Oh, wait, you think those men are un-manly.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 12:59 AM
10

Feminism tells them to fuck lots of men and to dislike men for fucking them too much. You can't have an enemy if you don't let them do what you condemn them for.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 12:06 AM
8

(b) keeping the money flowing through the system so it gets its cut. Exactly. No mailing your checks to the mom directly, that doesn't count as proper child support. Mail it to the department, they skim their percentage and they pass on the remainder. Oh, and your kid doesn't have the right to benefit from the money.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 12:04 AM
7

I understand this. When I'm very hungry, I flip it and tell people I don't want to eat. When I'm sick, I flip it and tell people I'm feeling healthy. Why do other people not understand this perfectly reasonable thought process? Stupid other people. When I say "I want a job" I mean "I don't want a job" you fools. Why don't you know how to communicate properly?
/r/MensRights16/07/19 12:00 AM
11

Ironically, in the last three panels, it reminds me of how women goad men into carrying heavy stuff all the time,
/r/MensRights15/07/19 11:51 PM
5

That little bit about grammatical gender- my understanding of linguistics is that it's an empty semantic category which often distinguishes between sentient and nonsentient nouns. As for pronouns, I've studied languages which use gender neutral pronouns and I really didn't see any big change or advantage to that, apart from simply not conveying the information to determine whether someone is male or female. Why conveying less information in a sentence would be a better linguistic construction is…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:59 AM
10

Give every woman the ability to destroy a man's career with accusations that are impossible to disprove, then wring your hands about the shortage of male mentors who are misogynists for not stupidly opening themselves to false charges. Demonize men who open doors for you, then complain that men aren't opening doors for you because they're lazy. Complain that dudes are sexist creep-os for looking at the cleavage you've got from your push-up bra and that you've painstakingly highlighted with darke…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 03:55 AM
7

No, everything women do is men's fault. Except for the really really good accomplishments, those are 100% women's responsibility! That's the only kind of responsibility she'll ever claim for women! She's terrified of any other kind.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 01:44 AM
8

Taking all responsibility away from women You do a pretty great job of that all on your own. You think they're slaves or something. You have effectively stripped every scintilla of responsibility from women with that mentality. Everything that they do or have ever done was only done under duress, you think-- except for the good accomplishments, which are 100% all women's own full doing and they deserve total and full credit for them. Like the child who demands ice cream without eating any spinac…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 01:24 AM
6

He's just the loaf who sits around all day, At his full time job. The lazy bastard.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 01:22 AM
5

Gee, if feminists are so offended by the benevolent sexism of excluding women from conscription, they could always militate against Selective Service and the idea that women make poor solders. They can start any day now.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 01:20 AM
3

I sometimes wonder why such women aren't considered accessories, when part of the appeal of being married to a mobster is that he's out doing badass illegal things. If a family member was out whacking people or fencing stolen goods and I knew all about it, I sure as hell am not innocent by pleading ignorance.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 01:16 AM
7

Complain about the lack of women in STEM on the way to your Underwater Women's Basket-Weaving Sudies classes.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 01:08 AM
6

She made it sound as if she couldn't get away from him.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 07:34 AM
4

Was he supposed to be happy or indifferent? He was supposed to be overjoyed. Every mundane thing that a woman decides to do, you're supposed to applaud her until the bones in your wrists shatter.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 07:32 AM
29

I came aware of this the hard way. Long story short: In grad school, the woman I was dating swapped homework for certain classes that we had in common. She did some of my homework and I did some of hers. There was this one professor for whom I wrote both papers-- basically the same content-- and my girlfriend ended up with a higher grade each time. I would get a B+ and she would get an A- or I'd get a B and she'd get a B+. I even threw a few intentional grammar mistakes into her papers, it didn'…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 03:51 AM
15

That's a very kind sentiment, I think a lot of readers here will appreciate it.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 03:48 AM
5

I'm glad someone else can enjoy it as well ;)
/r/MensRights14/07/19 03:29 AM
7

She had the power to end this at any time. She had no power! She was naught but a helpless tiny dust-bunny whirling around in the unstoppable vortex of his relentless industrial-strength leaf-blower!
/r/MensRights14/07/19 03:15 AM
8

Hey, how much do you wanna bet that she lived with him rent-free the whole time? It's a curious detail about the relationship which isn't mentioned anywhere in her sob-story. And before you twist that into "it doesn't justify him being a douche" NO it surely doesn't, but I just find that detail to be an interesting omission.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 03:11 AM
10

why not take it out and use another form of birth control? HEY HER BODY HER CHOICE. Are you suggesting that choices can have both positive and negative consequences? You rape apologist you. She says he never talked to her about not wanting to have sex, did she try to tell him why? Did she talk to him about a more accommodating schedule to have sex. Or was it all on him to "figure this out"? Just when I think you couldn't sink any lower, you start suggesting that she could do something to avoid b…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:55 AM
14

It sounds like a dysfunctional relationship, but it doesn't sound to me like she was raped. It's not so difficult to catch my drift, really. And it's not "defensiveness" you're seeing from me, it's just the sort of response that a human makes when they encounter a laughable, ridiculous, overwrought claim. It's mockery, not "defensiveness." The dude described in this woman's sob-story sounds like a douche, but he doesn't exactly sound like a rapist. Women often give their boyfriends the pouty sil…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:28 AM
1

So this vile monster manipulated someone into having sex with him. Not "force," manipulate. That counts as a rape in your book, does it? How about insincerely sweet-talking someone into sex? Is that a rape aslo? It results in someone feeling lied-to and that's kind of hurtful.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:16 AM
14

He would give her the silent treatment if she said no, thus making her feel guilty Wow, that sounds exactly like pointing a gun at her head! I wonder what this monster was offering her that made her feel it was worthwhile to keep the rape-filled relationship going.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:08 AM
25

Basically, anything can be rape if a woman calls it that. This is the idea they stick to, no matter what. Unfortunately, this also runs the risk of diluting the meaning. If rape includes "unenthusiastic sex after a glass of wine" it doesn't really sound so bad.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 11:06 PM
5

Hey, Megan is allowed to showcase her swear-laced bawdy facsimile of toxic masculinity. As a butch lesbian, it's stickin' it to patriarchy or subverting the paradigm or reclaiming something or other.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 01:46 AM
9

It is you who doesn't understand the simple truth: VAGINA MONEY. See? MONEY VAGINA NOW. VAGINA MONEY NOW, VAGINA. MONEY VAGINA NOW MONEY. MONEY VAGINA MONEY, LOTS OF MONEY VAGINA. also: MONEY VAGINA. I can't make it any simpler than that.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 07:44 AM
173

Just out of curiosity, has anyone seen the argument that since the women's teams are just as good as (or even superior to) the men's teams, the women's teams ought to therefore start playing the men's teams? You'd think that would be the next logical thing they'd want to argue in favor of. Unless they are aware, on some level, that they aren't entirely comparable.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 03:55 AM
2

Great. She designed a useless thing that looks ugly and no one will use but it makes a statement. GIRL POWER! WHOOT! Next up, she'll design a 759-pound chunk of irregularly shaped nickel which has razor-sharp edges that make it too dangerous for anyone to touch. As a statement. Impractical? You bet! But what a statement!
/r/MensRights11/07/19 01:06 AM
2

He lost more than half his friends and found out just how much "power" he had relative to the female claim. Oh, don't you worry. He'll fail to learn the relevant lesson, no matter how long it takes.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 12:13 AM
4

Feminists believe that clothing can send messages-- hence T-shirts with slogans on them-- but not sexual messages. It's fragmented thinking and motivated reasoning, yes, but that's what their ideology demands.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 06:00 AM
134

Silly boy. Women can't be sexist. It's in their rule book.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 05:58 AM
4

I recall my reaction to this was very similar. In the 1950s, there was a survey circulated around American businesses which asked: What was the most productivity-enhancing change from the past? #1 answer? Cooled air. Throughout the south and southwest, the top complaint used to be it was too hot to work in the summer. That's how historically ignorant these arguments are. If you're cold, darling? Put on a cardigan. Act like the fucking man you claim to be equal to.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 03:19 AM
3

No no you're using math, a tool of the patriarchy. It's unfair that women get 18.1% of gate, it needs to be 150% and it's the fault of men for paying attention to stupid details. "MONEY ME, ME MONEY NOW."
/r/MensRights08/07/19 12:46 AM
2

No, see "it's the same job." If a woman plays for 5 minutes, it's the same as a man playing for 3 hours. It's why 1 single banana should cost the same as 9 bananas. They're the same fruit, you know. Just because there are 9 bananas, why should you irrationally pay more for them? That's discrimination against individual bananas.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 12:40 AM
14

That's not flirting, that's hooking.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 01:23 AM
1

Bit of trivia: Central Florida used to have the worst blackout record in the US back in the 1970s and 80s. The reason is because it has a 12-month growing season and the constant growth of foliage would interfere with the power lines (big tropical birds shitting on the lines was another story; that was a big problem down around Key West). As a result, crews have to drive around and trim back foliage every day of the year (according to painstakingly compiled agronomy maps since not all plants gro…
/r/MensRights05/07/19 01:04 AM
5

when cooking began to become more mainstream Jesus fucking Christ, it's a daily activity in every household. How can you get more "mainstream" than that? You know what used to be female work? Making household clothing. Spinning your own thread went the way of the dodo because of the industrial revolution, does she have a problem with that as well? Was that men usurping women's position in textiles? How about dipping candles? 60 hours of dipping strings into smelly tallow would get you 6 months o…
/r/MensRights04/07/19 11:58 PM
1

Yup. And I was terribly offended when I saw that the male baby wasn't made to wear a pink dress and play with dolls in every single panel.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 11:54 PM
22

But of course. She appeared in cosmetic surgery ads as the "before" picture.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 12:38 AM
2

I really hope she didn't use The Man's electricity, gasoline, running water or flush toilets. She should have only used female-built telecommunications networks, female-built telephones, female-built air conditioning and everything else, too. I wonder if she uses female-developed mathematics to count how many book copies she produced on her female-developed industrial printing with the female-developed book-binding, delivered in female-developed trucks to female-built bookshops, in female-produc…
/r/MensRights04/07/19 12:19 AM
3

Thanks. Hey, did you know that all analogies are imperfect?
/r/MensRights04/07/19 12:12 AM
3

How about a power in which women can point a finger at a man, say a few magic words, and get him fired? Wow, wouldn't that be cool?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 04:56 AM
15

See, women like this don't know where electricity comes from. They honestly, truly believe that utility networks will last perpetually, without maintenance, through good weather and bad. All they must do is sit back and enjoy life, all merrily eating their cakes and ice cream, until a thunderstorm rolls in, knocks the power grid offline, then the all-female repair crew will appear and... uh, the all-female repair crew will.. uh... they will... uh... the... surely there is one of those at the pow…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 04:46 AM
7

You mean "magic." That stuff works by "magic."
/r/MensRights03/07/19 04:35 AM
9

I agree. In fact, we should also get rid of the organisms who keep giving birth to these darned men as well. No sense in letting the baby factories walk around, posing a male-production risk.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 04:23 AM
2

Well, I think it's notable that the women do not really need to make an effort to become "dominant." Sounds kind of lazy to me, really.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:56 AM
3

Yes, but what kind of feminist? There are just SO many kinds! So many varieties! So many flavors! Which feminism are you talking about? Which one? Which one? Golly, or perhaps you're one of those Fake Feminists who make the Real Feminists look like dippy hypocrites? God knows, there are thousands of those Fake Feminists going around spoiling the good name of feminism- perhaps you should prove you're not one of those first?
/r/MensRights02/07/19 08:00 AM
2

That's because an accusation is proof. It is all the proof you need.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 01:47 AM
3

Exactly. Denying being a rapist is exactly what a rapist would do.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 01:46 AM
1

Say, I wonder if she's one of those women who would sleep around then sue her BF for child support?? It's better to speculate whether she isn't one of those.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 11:55 PM
4

Hey, it's not a lie if you believe it! Her rape was real to her and that matters more than any patriarchal "evidence" that shows it was made up.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 11:52 PM
4

scrutinising her credit card Yeah, a dude should just pay for it without seeing it. Her privacy is her own, so is his money and don't you forget it you cheap bastards. Mary Crooks is aptly named, however.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 11:49 PM
3

Did they put urinal stalls and men's shaving supplies in the women's bathrooms too?
/r/MensRights28/06/19 12:10 AM
9

Absolutely. It's sexist for a woman to pay for the stuff she buys.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 11:01 AM
12

What? You mean you can't have your cake and eat it too? Taking one road means you can't take the other road? Actions have consequences? Options involve costs whether the option is exercised or not? Pffft, you're either thinking like a real misogynist naysaying sexist... or a grown up.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:29 AM
32

"Anyone" means "any woman."
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:15 AM
42

Oh no, college is sexist! Also: We need even more women in college!
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:14 AM
1

Orcs. She deserves fucking orcs.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:29 AM
18

He did what I told him to do! The fucking bastard! Kill him! Fry him! ...FFS, these chicks and their nonsensical hyperinsane complaints are truly getting on my nerves. As you'd expect, the advice is that the man should change. He should follow orders but read her mind. You have every right to ask that you two coordinate big decisions, not because you want to dictate his choices (or vice versa), but because you want to act as a team. Right. "You're a team so he should do what you say." The dude i…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:28 AM
5

So she still expects him to put his life on the line for her. She wants the knight in shining armor but she wants to call him by a completely different name. No no, don't be silly. No knight in armor for her. Instead, she wants the samurai in a lacquered steel cuirass or a Mameluke in a scaled hauberk vest or a vityaz in chain mail and spiked bogatyrka helmet, but certainly not a knight in shining armor!
/r/MensRights25/06/19 01:48 AM
7

“I know! These guys won’t leave me alone! They keep begging to take me to dinner.” What disgusting bastards! UGH! Kill them all. Bastards.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 01:18 AM
2

Hey, it doesn't matter if she doesn't pay her own bills as long as she calls herself independent loudly enough. That's all that matters! There are no differences between concrete and words, between steel and feel, between thoughts and deeds, between spirit and flesh, between action and wishes! You're totally a feminist, even as you expect your boyfriend to take a bullet for Your Highness.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 01:14 AM
4

"Yes, I'm a feminist and I should do whatever I want, but I also believe in getting the fruits of traditional womanhood as if I were a 19th century lady in a bustle and petticoat!" Wanting it both ways, wanting the cake and eating it too, working both sides of the street, demanding everything while delivering nothing- it's the modern woman's way! The only way a woman like this can get the best of both worlds is if her male partner gets the shit end of every stick.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 12:52 AM
4

It'll be an all-woman mission control, obviously. We can't have a single man contaminating any portion of this important mission. Except for the rocket, the feminist-designed ones kept blowing-up on the launchpad due to sexism.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:24 AM
5

You wouldn't believe how annoyed some of them get when I point this out. But you'll still find the occasional sophist who'll say with a straight face that, YES, indeed, only praise can be generalized to the non-generalizable feminism. At this point, their guff is laid bare.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 06:34 AM
19

Yes, but who could these astro-grrls blame for stuff? Certainly not themselves. They'd need at least one man around to scream at when the going gets tough.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 06:14 AM
29

But men should pay alimony until they're put 6 feet down in the cold, cold ground and then for several years thereafter. No, seriously, this is good to see.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:06 AM
7

Don't help women if they're not in your family. Seriously, they gave-up any claim to chivalry a long time ago. Men are scum, women don't need no fuckin' man's help, women can lift their own goddamned bags. You GO girl.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:49 AM
11

Try this: Generalized praise about feminism does not need to be limited to a teeny subgroup. It applies to the whole. If feminism can be praised as a whole, it can be criticized as a whole. This normally doesn't stop them from doing their bullshit dodge, but it does trip them up.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:13 AM
5

Well done. I was in college when the "how schools shortchange girls" study came out and it didn't seem to comport to the reality that I knew. Then, not long after, Newsweek magazine had this grand 4-week series "WAR ON WOMEN," about all the violence which women have to suffer through every day. Today, at least there is SOME kind of pushback. It used to be 1%, now it's maybe 2%.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 12:46 AM
10

which I personally helped to debunk. I'd love to know more. Seriously, you can't just tease me like that.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:54 PM
5

It crossed my mind. But if the dude was black, she wouldn't admit it due to her progressive self-image. She'd make him out to be some kind of red-headed Viking or something. Complete with war-axe and horned helmet.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 08:40 AM
7

"Did he look like a Muslim?" "No, that would be bigotry!"
/r/MensRights23/06/19 08:28 AM
5

The level of "concern" is irrelevant to any actual threat. Elderly people may feel more at risk of violence, but that does not support the notion that the elderly are more at risk of violence. Some people are scared of flying on planes but they are unafraid to ride in cars, but that does not mean cars are far less dangerous to ride in than planes. People are frequently afraid of the wrong things. We often fear vivid, cognitively available images and that distorts people's judgments of risk all t…
/r/MensRights23/06/19 03:31 AM
6

A popular phrase by the novelist Margaret Atwood, Hill said, sums up this dilemma perfectly: "Men are afraid women will laugh at them," Atwood famously wrote, "and women are afraid men will kill them. It's an unsupportable opinion and a particularly pathetic one.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 02:13 AM
1

Obvious schizophrenics are obvious.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:21 PM
1

Haha, yeah-- "group stalking." Completely indistinguishable from paranoid schizophrenia.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:20 PM
2

Hey miss, why can't you break the ice, you strong independent woman?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:19 PM
1

Oh no, we have to destroy computer science because it's sexist! All True Feminists must throw their computers into the trash so that a trash man can take it away!
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:15 PM
3

But but the feminists speak for all women!!11!!
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:13 PM
2

Some jobs used to be reserved for women in the 1800s. Schoolteachers and midwives, for instance. Yeah, my mom used to say that when credit cards first came out in the 60s, her husband had to co-sign the application. And this was supposedly sexist paternalism, but she didn't mention that it was because her husband was legally on the hook to help pay the bill. So if dad was on the hook to help pay the bill, why shouldn't he have co-signed the form? Ahh, mom, you delightfully selective storyteller.…
/r/MensRights22/06/19 10:32 PM
3

No, but women must!
/r/MensRights22/06/19 10:26 PM
3

But who will write jokes about period blood and how men stupidly fail to pick their socks off the floor??
/r/MensRights22/06/19 10:24 PM
2

Truths are frequently unpopular.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 06:24 AM
12

Agreed, and this is something that doesn't get the attention it deserves. Being male makes you disposable and being black intensifies it to an insane level.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 03:09 AM
4

She even got more pissed when all I said was "bye" and didn't give a shit at all. Hahaa, delectable.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 01:34 AM
1

Mehnz, you scheming devilish masterminds and your endless infernal secret machinations! Curse you! Currrrrrse youuuuuuuu!
/r/MensRights21/06/19 12:42 AM
25

No no, when they said they wanted "equality," it meant they only wanted the good parts. When desired, the fruits of traditional womanhood in patriarchy are an absolute must!
/r/MensRights20/06/19 03:56 AM
1

It sounds like you know what you're doing.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:45 AM
3

See you should judge them based on their work. And if her work isn't up to snuff, you have to ignore the work and appreciate the diversity she brings. After all, the men can easily pick up any slack and gallantly keep it to themselves.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:12 AM
5

That's really what gets me. They demand quotas and then they demand that you either 1. pretend there isn't a quota or 2. love the quota. You either love it or pretend it's not there. You're not supposed to notice the quota in any other way. Merit? Hah! That's just code for "favoring white mehnz," you sexist racist you. Once you accept that "having a vagina" is the only relevant qualification for anything, the rest follows naturally.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:00 AM
13

Saskia Schuster said she realised last year that "an awful lot of my comedy entertainment shows are made up of all-male writing teams". Boo hiss! Women shouldn't be excluded because they are no different from men! She said: "Too often the writing room is not sensitively run. It can be aggressive and slightly bullying." Yay! Women should be included because they are very different from men! She said female writers struggle because: It is difficult to compete for jobs with men who have more writin…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:25 AM
10

No mystery at all. They're proud sluts when it comes to their own sex lives, harsh and censorious puritans for men's sex lives. "Sex for me, not for thee" should be one of their mottos, alongside "We don't hate men even though they're evil fuckers" and "Ask me about my presumptions of male guilt."
/r/MensRights17/06/19 10:13 PM
41

I hope they didn't mention anything about our kitten barbecues. Those are supposed to be a secret.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 05:37 AM
13

It's not fair and equal if it isn't strictly about women.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 01:34 AM
10

Didn't you hear? It's not "equality" if it doesn't benefit women only.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 01:04 AM
2

Okay, and if Aisha Hinds and Zhang Ziyi had died to save mere men (p'tui!), that would have been less sexist? So when women die, that's sexist, and when women don't die, that's also sexist. Okay. All right. Great analysis, honey. Fabulous. Wonderful. Well done. Why hasn't this genius been given a Nobel Prize for Complaining yet?
/r/MensRights16/06/19 08:39 AM
1

If you stuck her in a room with 100 men, she'd probably gravitate to the worst one and start flirting with him.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 02:52 AM
16

Well, see, when a woman wants a thing she simply must have it and it's immoral to deny her the thing. Men need to shut up, man up, keep the stiff upper lip, nose to the grindstone, grow a pair, etc etc.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 02:26 AM
24

Also, he savagely manipulated her by apologizing. She just kept going back to that master manipulator, who cleverly manipulated her via apologies. What a puppeteer! To manipulate by apologizing?
/r/MensRights14/06/19 02:23 AM
39

That's just for men. Women can grab whatever they want on a man's body, tee hee.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 01:46 AM
12

I don't know about you, but my biggest problem is having too much privilege. I can't walk down the street without people handing me whiskey and cigars and offering me CEO jobs. Sheesh, can't I just get to the store to get a simple tin of free caviar?
/r/MensRights14/06/19 01:13 AM
5

Demand everything, offer nothing. It's the modern woman's way!
/r/MensRights13/06/19 11:59 PM
1

Performance is no excuse when they're "doing the same job." It's the same job so pay them the same! "Yes, but do they have the same productivity? Working the same consecutive number of years in the-" "THEY'RE DOING THE SAME JOB!!!!1!!"
/r/MensRights13/06/19 08:04 AM
1

That's not how it works. See, if men's teams beat women's teams it doesn't count. If a woman team beats a men's team, it means women are just as good or even better than men. It only goes one way, and the reporting on the women's team needs to be full of lies if it's necessary to maintain the desired illusion. I recall some headlines a few years back which blared WOMAN WINS BOSTON MARATHON, without mentioning that the women's race got a 25 minute head start and, by the way, it was actually the w…
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:58 AM
1

isn't able to understand how this works. She's trying to gin-up notice for herself among voters, not make sense.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:57 AM
2

the US will not have a national soccer program for much longer as they will go bankrupt. "See? The patriarchy won't accept equality! It would rather destroy everything than treat women fairly!" or whatever hogwash adequately expresses the lunacy.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:55 AM
4

They start mumbling and kicking pebbles when you ask them what their solution is. Require people to watch certain games, surely? For every 1 hour of men's soccer, they have to watch 1 hour of women's soccer and spend the same amount of money on merch and so on. They have no solutions, except for complaining. Complaining is the point.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:49 AM
4

The men should give half of their money to the women. That's the only fair solution. In fact, the men shouldn't get a single penny and all of their money should go to the women because of 10 zillion years of penisocratical dominification or testiculopression or soccermansplaining or sexyism-doohiclular mancentrism or whatever it's called. It doesn't matter- money, give it now.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:45 AM
2

At least equally? But hold on-- are you suggesting it's ok for them to earn more for some reason? Well, gol-lee! I thought earning more for doing "the same work" was wrong? I thought it was unfair for that to happen. I mean, there's no good justification for that happening when it's men earning more, yes? So why should things be different the other way around? "Equality" is like a one-way socket wrench, right? Crank it in one direction only to tighten that nut, but never untighten it.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:42 AM
3

I don't think she really has a plan. The money will simply come from somewhere. How about you, young man? You look like you have money to spare.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 07:31 AM
1

Ohh, don't stab the women. Don't stab them! Gee, thanks for clearing that up Paul. What would I do without you?
/r/MensRights13/06/19 12:49 AM
4

We should be happy in our servitude.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 12:47 PM
160

Yeah, crazy idea-- hey, shall we count the audience size? No? Aww, why not? Sounds like we should sue the audience for discrimination, then.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 12:46 PM
5

Between the feminists who say "men are bastards for mansplaining" and the feminists who say "men are bastards for not mansplaining," the combo just looks like goddamned multiple personality disorder. And you're a misogynist for getting annoyed by having people simultaneously condemn you for talking and condemn you for shutting up.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 07:26 AM
7

Not if this brilliant woman has her say. "Mentor women or else, you cowardly bastards. Ignore the interpersonal nukes that they're brandishing, how dare you have self-preservation instincts!"
/r/MensRights12/06/19 07:24 AM
8

To be honest, a mentor doesn't have a lot of reasons to bother having a protege. The protege benefits from gaining experience and a network of contacts through the mentor; the mentor might gain from having a protege's fresh perspectives but there's not much else. That is why organizations with mentoring programs have to make it a requirement for the mentor, perhaps offering incentives for them to take part. It is a very unequal relationship. Sandberg, this Genius Businesswoman (but I repeat myse…
/r/MensRights12/06/19 06:06 AM
5

is because so many women are making FALSE accusations against men in the workplace. No, those are a myth. Like the Loch Ness monster or the non-abusive man.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 05:58 AM
6

If there were women in positions of power, they would harass or abuse no one because they provide perfect justice as long as the person they're judging is sympathetic or cute.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 05:58 AM
13

Hold her breath until she turns blue, I hope. Oh God, I hope it's that.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 05:56 AM
18

Okay, then we'll just go out for a beer together. Or perhaps a golf game. Maybe a movie. No no no. Not allowed. You can only provide professional assistance to women, nothing else. That's got to be your whole life now. It's either that, or have no contact with anyone at all. You will help women or you are allowed to do nothing! This is a perfectly reasonable demand that all men must follow!!
/r/MensRights12/06/19 03:23 AM
12

You need to fill out the application before you're allowed to take a leak. Also, you're not allowed to talk to male co-workers while you're in there, because that's unfairly withholding work-related business from women and they need that to get ahead. Simply getting you fired for trumped-up charges isn't enough, see. They need to take credit for your ideas as well.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 02:13 AM
1

So which sex has the higher absentee rate, Nick? Surely men? No? It's the other one? Oh but that's not their doing, is it? It's the fault of everyone else who doesn't take that time off. The main reason women are more likely to call-in sick is because they're afraid of getting raped on the bus, probably. What is it about working for someone else that makes white men so angry? Nat Turner might have a few ideas. As might Fredrick Douglass and Toussaint L'Ouverture and-- wait, those dudes weren't w…
/r/MensRights12/06/19 02:09 AM
1

Men aren't allowed to choose their own friends? FFS, except for being mindlessly happy slaves, what are men allowed to do on their own?
/r/MensRights12/06/19 01:56 AM
1

Something I just noticed: I've been seeing the Central Park 5 being covered more and more by progressive media outlets. Probably because Trump was involved in hyping the case back in the '80s. Women never lie about rape, except when you can get some political hay out of it.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 01:33 AM
16

How are women supposed to win if men are allowed to do vile things like defend themselves? It should be like in real life, when a strong independent woman slaps the cheek of a foul-talking cad without the cad responding; also, there needs to be an army of chivalrous White Knights to defend the poor helpless maiden's honor in case the cad doesn't voluntarily restrain himself.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 12:06 AM
18

Hey, Strong Independent Wimin don't need no mansplainer giving them so-called MENtoring. Hah! Who needs a man when you've got grrl pwrrrr?
/r/MensRights09/06/19 11:52 PM
3

No duties at all, your generosity is mandatory. You are owed nothing. It's the Strong Independent Womyn's Way! Now pay for her goddamned coconut shrimp.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 10:14 AM
1

Frankly, it's racist that this woman hasn't read enough Melanesian authors from the highlands of New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. In fact, I would suggest that it would be racist for her to read in any writing system out of the Indo-European language group. Sorry my colonialist darling, but you'd better learn Cuneiform or Mayan script if you wanna avoid that racist trap.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 11:37 PM
6

Pah, stupid mehnz. You're doing all the wrong things. You are supposed to admit your guilt, weep with humiliating contrition and quietly walk into the nearby complementary suicide/corpse-incineration booth. After you start inventing such a booth. See? You're behind schedule already, you lazy jerks!
/r/MensRights07/06/19 04:19 AM
22

"Women's violence against men doesn't happen, and it's hilarious."
/r/MensRights07/06/19 03:02 AM
13

How do you know the race and sex of an author? Do you have to research the author before reading their book? Absolutely. Athol Fugard? The anti-apartheid South African author? She can't read him. Even though he's genuinely African, he ain't dark enough.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 12:00 AM
64

FTA: It also occurred to me that the majority of books that I was exposed to in school as the real “literary” works were by white men. ...and if you grew up in China, most of the literary works foundational to that culture would be written by Chinese people. Your mind, did I just blow it? Is your jaw on the floor? Are you seeing through the 5th dimension now? Do you need to sit down to stop the room from spinning?
/r/MensRights06/06/19 10:24 PM
3

From the vice article: I mean, if you can't dismantle patriarchy, you may as well stick a heel through its foot. So patriarchy = men. I do love how this slips-out when speaking flippantly or off the cuff but strenuously denied when launching into tirades about how much such-and-such a feminist wants to "destroy patriarchy".
/r/MensRights06/06/19 08:06 AM
10

That's half of feminist jurisprudence boiled into one sentence. Well done.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 07:50 AM
8

A Vice article, you say? Surely, they didn't skimp on details when it came to MGTOW's notorious kitten barbecues.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 07:32 AM
45

Oh no, women might not be able to lie with impunity sometimes. Damn you patriarchy!
/r/MensRights06/06/19 02:30 AM
3

My god, that woman is made of nothing but Grade A Cringe.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 12:27 AM
1

a few people aren't representative of the whole. And yet they fit in to the group so very well... It's that trope of "find the woman that terrifies you." I have never heard this statement before in my entire life. Are "tropes" just being made-up on the spot now? Fear is actually a reasonable response to something that can endanger you. A healthy self-protective instinct isn't to be sneered at, and you wouldn't believe the number of women who try to manipulate men by calling them cowards.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 12:11 AM
16

She didn't realize she was raped until after she wasn't offered the part she was auditioning for.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 12:19 AM
1

I'd like to believe this. I really would.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 01:42 PM
14

It's interesting that she doesn't brag about anything so uncouth and venal as selling more units as an accomplishment. And if the result of her ads is fewer units sold, she will reply that it is toxic masculinity that is hurting sales and it must be done away with by another round of ads. The drop in sales is, in fact, proof that the ads are effective and working.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 01:41 PM
4

She's taught them what scum men are, and the world is richer and woker for it. You're welcome, you ingrate.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 08:01 AM
4

There ain't quite no kind of stupid like Feminist Stupid. Also: "Man-hating? What man-hating? I don't see any so-called 'man-hating'..." Edit: I guess part of me can't help but note how gleefully and effortlessly this chick puts-on the airs and stylings of a self-righteous bigot. Woke people are tin-pot dictators, minus the army.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 06:54 AM
8

Maybe it's just me, but I think adults in positions of responsibility should be held to a higher standard than rank and file kids coming in off the street.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 12:32 AM
7

That topic is incredibly relevant, yes. Really, I suspect that part of the obsession with racism which exists within feminism is to distract everyone from the extent to which white girls are cashing-in on various institutions' anti-discrimination efforts. When a white girl goes up against a black man, one of them is absolutely more disposable than the other.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 10:12 AM
2

....dafuq?
/r/MensRights02/06/19 09:37 AM
11

That third one really is a stretch. But do you know who stigmatizes married women with children? Women like this one. That's why she left it off the list: that's her job.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 12:08 AM
4

I know a dude on the street who'd love to play a few honest rounds of 3-card monte with you. It's only $5 per game, but bring plenty more.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 07:18 AM
1

they compromise their values and come across as hypocrites. Oh, and no feminists would ever do that.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 07:15 AM
14

If a girl did this to a guy, she would be an asshole. You must not go out much. If you ever decide to see a nightspot for a cold, tall glass of 2% milk, you'll discover that it's probably happening at the next table and that such assholes are simply having a typical girls' night out.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:39 AM
7

I don't know how you can enjoy a meal while hoping someone else is going to take the bill. Eh, you'd understand if you weren't a dude. I'm sure you could find a way to enjoy it if you used your imagination.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:38 AM
46

Damn, you left a smoking crater.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:36 AM
9

If it was one of my non-drinking days, probably. My non-drinking days include Arbor Day and February 29th.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 02:28 AM
1

It was in the context of her talking about teaching towards the female student, so that she'll "turn to the guy next to her." She certainly wasn't thinking about teaching to the male thing in the room as an aim. Yes, it could have been a poor word choice, but I really came-away with the impression that she wasn't particularly concerned about the dude's reactions to her teaching.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 10:22 PM
36

.......
/r/MensRights31/05/19 10:19 PM
5

Hee. Julie Burchill doesn't seem to realize that Raab is referring to the likes of her when he said "obnoxious bigots." Yes yes, he's talking about the wholly fictional, non-existent feminists who espouse ideas suspiciously similar to those of Julie Burchill.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 08:48 AM
4

I remember some Gender Studies professor who made a similar slip. She said "one of my students will turn to the guy next to her," and then I thought "okay, so who is 'the guy next to' the student if not another student?" And it really kind of suggested that she only regarded her female students as being the genuine students and the other doofuses in the class are just ambulatory paperweights or something.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 08:45 AM
14

About the wikipedia thing: the people commenting on that gender disparity were truly working hard to find ways to blame that on men. I had to give them an A for effort. They really couldn't think of how it was possible, other than to posit that too many men made the atmosphere poisonous or something. Apart from that, they just weren't able to coherently explain how a platform which is open to everyone, in which one can keep one's sex a secret, how that is persecuting women somehow. But they abso…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 08:40 AM
10

And not one of them even brought up the idea of making tampons free and abortion pills available over the counter for a penny a pound. What a bunch of inconsiderate jerks.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:06 AM
2

OR, there's the fabulous appearance of Laurey Penny on a panel where David Stakey demolishes her There's another youtube vid in which Mark Crispin Miller makes Laurie feel like a dimwit for pointing out he was a fuckin' white man and therefore a racist misogynist. Her response was to have a snit and write a screed where she points out that the fuckin' white man is indeed a fuckin' white man, so HAH! Critically, she never attempts to rebut what he actually said.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 03:18 AM
4

These women have such gigantic holes in their knowledge-base, it's not funny. Melded with their desperate motivated reasoning, deadly allergic imperative to avoid logic and the smug moral self-satisfaction that they feel, it's a potent skull-filling narcotic.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 11:02 PM
7

But of course! Women should be proud of their genitals! They're not demonic weapons of rape akin to the disssssgusting penis about which no one should ever speak. Penis.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 11:00 PM
11

These women love using penises as an insult. That's how you know they're real grrrl geniuses. Ada Lovelace, apparently, was the first programmer, because Charles Babbage didn't know how to use the machine he conceived, designed and built. Hah! Stupid dunce-cap wearing idiot. It should've been called the Lovelace Analytical Engine. Fucking patriarchy, always stealing women's ideas. The next thing you know, people will claim that men originally used to wear high heels when everyone knows that men …
/r/MensRights29/05/19 10:49 PM
3

I know. There were no male musicians or songwriters or composers before Liverpool disgorged its evil mop-topped demons. Did you know a woman invented fire? One minute later, men probably burned her at the stake and took all the credit because that's how they do.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 10:47 PM
1

People tend to treat loved ones differently from strangers. Yes, I do things for my wife that I wouldn't do for a random stranger and there have been past occasions in which I have rescued a female acquaintance or two from minor perils. I really can't say what percentage was a visceral compulsion and what percentage was simply doing what seemed like the right thing according to upbringing, but I suspect it was way more of the latter than the former. Pathological caveman behavior, surely.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 09:51 PM
5

It goes back to 'A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle". It created a division between the sexes. Wait wait, you're saying that feminism told men to fuck off?? And the men responded by.... fucking off??!! You misogynist. Sure, feminism told men to fuck-off, but men are evil bastards for listening to them! Fuck off! Also: Men never listen! What evil bastards men are for not listening to what feminism tells them to do! They should just fuck right off! Also also: Feminism didn't kill chiv…
/r/MensRights29/05/19 10:38 AM
3

Next week, she'll discover the latest terroristic patriarchal ploy: Marmalade jars that won't open! BOO! They're way more insidious than the patriarchally non-opening pickle jars that she discovered last week! And even more nefarious than the stuck fast patriarchal ketchup bottle she discovered the previous month! And more vile than the patriarchal jammed shut chocolate pudding pak of late 2018! Is there no end to these sneaky, oppressive machinations??
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:29 AM
6

I was being facetious.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:19 AM
6

BUT BUT BUT A REAL MAAN WOULD HAPPILY JUMP ON THAT GRENADE!!!1111! YOU NEED TO GO DOWN WITH THE SINKING SHIP, YOU UNGALLANT SWINE!!!1!!!
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:09 AM
7

Why bother raising children properly? How needlessly troublesome that is for parents. You can simply let 'em roam around wild in the field.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:05 AM
12

I think it's an obligation which is, oftentimes, imposed upon me. And, unsurprisingly, I resent the kinds of situations where there's a heavy box to be lifted and the ladies turn to me and say "Well...?" as if I'm supposed to tip my hat and hop right to it. It's not biological in origin, it gets beaten into boys' skulls as they grow up. There might've been a point in time where a fellow would get a certain appreciation for doing that kind of thing-- the appreciation made it tolerable-- but a lot…
/r/MensRights29/05/19 05:31 AM
3

Well. I guess it's finally high time for me to knock it off. But I still get to keep 'em chained up in my torture-basement full of power tools and surgical implements. She didn't mention anything was wrong about that so I guess that stuff is still OK.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 01:46 AM
2

teach women to say no when they don't want sex. But but but it's a man's responsibility to know when a "yes" is going to mean "no" 2 months later!!!11!!! This is a totally reasonable demand!!11!!
/r/MensRights29/05/19 12:22 AM
2

Let me guess: Women are but hapless but adorable victims. Now let me read it... yeah, that sums it up. And it goes without saying who the ultimate, perennial villains are.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 11:50 PM
11

But she used no less important a source than Tumblr for her raw material. Tumblr! Wowwww....
/r/MensRights28/05/19 11:48 PM
5

I likes cheezkakes. So now teh menz own all of teh cheezkakes!1! Ha ha ha ha ha!1!1!1!!eleven!!!
/r/MensRights28/05/19 11:46 PM
1

You'll notice that I'm not saying that people shouldn't do what they like.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 10:03 PM
3

In case she hasn't made it clear, she doesn't particularly like males very much and doesn't see much value in their existence.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 05:34 AM
13

Because it would require women to actually do something within their courtship and we can't possibly allow their free meal/free entertainment/free everything giftapalooza gravy train to be lessened even one degree.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 04:25 AM
3

I don't care for the superhero movie genre and I will be thankful when the trend finally ceases to make money.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 03:06 AM
0

I might've misunderstood your meaning, yes, but I don't feel the need to walk-back anything my 40+ year old ass might've said. And I also do think that the Boomer disdain for Gen X and Millennials is misplaced, considering it'll be our generation choosing (and staffing) their retirement homes. And if we don't really care about solving the roach and rat infestations they're tormented by, c'est la vie.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 02:59 AM
4

Golly, they sound full of hate. Oh, but that can't be true because that might reflect badly upon them and they're good, progressive people Who Just Want Equality For Everyone. Except the demonic scumbags with penises who need infinite punishment.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:57 AM
15

Can destitute people really be thought of as having consented to any kind of work if they need the money badly enough? Let's ask a Bangladeshi ship-breaker what he thin- oh, we don't care about him.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:55 AM
8

Why the downvotes for this post? It's a question we like answering.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 12:43 AM
5

chronological snobbery Yup. "People in the past were stupid."
/r/MensRights28/05/19 12:41 AM
4

I don't think I was promised the world. In the early 90s, it became pretty damn clear to me that there'd be no Social Security after the Boomers wrecked it. I saved and invested accordingly. I also taught older people how to use the Internet while they called me a slacker for, I dunno, not getting lifetime employment at General Electric with a high school degree at age 19.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 12:39 AM
3

Well the author is compensating for that fiasco by inculcating perfect politeness in boys. Or else. See, girls need to be rude and destructive and boys need to sit still and be quiet or else we'll activate their Electric Pain Collar. For equality. And its fun, too!
/r/MensRights28/05/19 12:32 AM
21

Rather conveniently, unattractive men are also hard-core misogynists, with the bar for "misogyny" being far lower and offenses being less easily forgiven than for literally anybody else on the planet. You can tell just by looking at them. Thanks, Miss Political Lesbian Who Thinks Men Are Icky!
/r/MensRights28/05/19 12:22 AM
2

I once had a feminist argue, with a suspicious level of passion, that doctor's orders about not drinking while pregnant were misogynistsic attempts to control women. Because, really no one knows how much alcohol is unsafe and in the absence of that information, erring on the side of caution is malevolent. Obviously, of course, it couldn't be motivated by something as silly as health, could it? For all this hooplah about abortion being "between a woman and her doctor," they sure as hell don't pay…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 11:42 PM
2

Well, we tend to not listen when unreasonable people demand that we uncritically swallow self-evident nonsense. I.e.: "If you are accused of a crime against a woman, you should go straight to jail and not allowed due process, for that would further traumatize your accuser." The only reasonable response is "No way," and that response gets you called "rape-loving scum." No human should listen to that.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 11:38 PM
9

Here's a serious question, and perhaps you can confirm or deny this because you've clearly gone through it on the inside. I have encountered a number of feminists who seem to think that they possess a type of intellectual superpower that they can use to win any argument with a man-- in fact, utterly invalidate everything he says-- simply by saying that he is a man and that everything he could therefore say is beneath worthlessness. And that amounts to an all-purpose nuclear victory and damning n…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 06:15 AM
2

"That's right, a GIRL wants to play football! Got a problem with that?" "No problem Lisa, we've got 2 girls on the team already."
/r/MensRights27/05/19 02:43 AM
15

I did some research on fetal alcohol syndrome once and I uncovered a news report from the late 80s... the Albany chapter of NOW was protesting a local regulation about putting up warning signs in bars directed at pregnant women. That was sexist, see, if you weren't also going to have signs warning men about the effects of alcohol on sperm (and feminists totally care about men's sperm, you know!). You came-away with the distinct impression that they thought pregnant women ought to go party as muc…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 01:15 AM
7

honestly, I was really starting to live in fear of men perpetrating random acts of violence against me at any moment. It definitely has a restricting effect on one's own life, so the point is clear. One of my largest problems with feminist ideology is its presumption of guilt upon one sex only. I have yet to see anyone attempt to tell me that I am wrong in that characterization.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 12:36 AM
22

He'll still be allowed to drop dudes off the side of a clock tower or shoot them in the back though, right?
/r/MensRights27/05/19 12:01 AM
23

Offensive =/= Untrue.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 09:55 PM
1

The dissonance is terrifying When an overindulged child demands all the toys and freaks-out when some other kid gets a toy, we wouldn't call that dissonance. What's more, a lot of feminists have the funny idea that "helping" women involves swaddling them in bubble-wrap as protection from the world's dangers until they turn blue from suffocation, and then they blame men for that.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 09:51 PM
8

I asked a girl what their ideal dick size is and they said 11 inches. Haahaahaahaaa.... does this chick know what numbers are? She certainly doesn't know what an inch is.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 09:57 AM
3

The truth is women who talk this way are too dumb to know what an average is, much less what the average dick is.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 09:54 AM
9

"He raped me! He said he was Norwegian! But I later found out he only lived in Norway for most of his life but he actually carries a Danish passport!"
/r/MensRights26/05/19 05:06 AM
3

she said I was an embarrassment. How? I'd have thrown the beer on her. And then she would accuse me of raping her because grrl pwr.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 11:32 PM
11

That is the mentality, yes. The Redstocking Manifesto was similarly honest. "In fighting for our liberation we will always take the side of women against their oppressors. We will not ask what is "revolutionary" or "reformist," only what is good for women." So if, say, torturing men is judged as something "good for women," they would be pro-torture until the stance was no longer "good for women" anymore.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 11:29 PM
9

It's very simple: Every man is unfit for every woman. Except the hunky celebrity multimillionaires; they're the only ones.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 12:39 PM
2

But but but- that's half the fun!
/r/MensRights25/05/19 08:22 AM
26

Why do I not exactly trust the article's headline and treatment of the topic?
/r/MensRights25/05/19 08:08 AM
12

Wow, why it's almost as if women possess within them a means of reproduction that men do not and that nature itself is a little bit sexist! And since I am not a hypocrite: I demand to be impregnated! So that I can run-off to have it aborted. Hah! That'll show the patriarchy that they can't control who can and can't have children by arbitrarily owning a womb. Just because some (probably male) doctor called my birth-gonads "testicles" doesn't mean they aren't actually a pair of freaky-deaky ovarie…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 08:37 AM
34

You have the right to shut up and listen to 2 different feminists screaming contradictory nonsense into each ear.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:36 AM
35

Women and men should be treated equally. There's your problem, chum. Feminism means you shut up, take orders and smilingly nod when they scream obscenities at you.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:54 AM
2

"Oh look, a male voiced product! As if we need yet another maaayaaan being a know-it-all, pfffft! I don't wanna listen to that, I wanna listen to a voice that sounds more like my best girlfriend, etc etc etc"
/r/MensRights24/05/19 12:29 AM
12

Fine, heat up the offices. In 2 weeks, the headlines will blare "SWEATY MEN SMELL BAD EEEEYEW!" To have the office "too cold" means you can put on a sweater and maybe not show-off your all-important goddamned legs and cleavage so much. To have it too hot means you have no recourse. To adjust it too cold is the least bad compromise because you chicks absolutely will start complaining about the steamy gym locker room smell that will inevitably result from your preferred comfy-womfy Caribbean beach…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 12:23 AM
3

I think you know the answer to that. "My AI has a male voice! It's because of misogyny like this that there aren't more women scientists! Rahrahrahpatriarchyrahrah etc etc etc!"
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:00 PM
1

Yes, you can find a small handful of women who care, but finding exceptions to a rule doesn't mean I cannot speak about the general rule.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:52 PM
9

as men we owe responsibility Haahaahahaahaahaaa.... phew. Do you wanna know how much women care about your well-being? Diddly-squat. That's how much. Zero. Bupkis. Zilch. Hичего. 没什么.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 01:43 PM
3

THIS. This is why I am rather content to see them drown in misery. This is why I have no fucks to give. The only proper response to this hyper-insanity is indifference.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:24 PM
7

I'm tempted to think she is just cynically pandering to get women's vote, I don't think you're wrong. She is promising something for nothing. "Vote for me, you'll get higher pay without working harder, longer or differently." Something for nothing is what she's promising.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 11:48 AM
1

I was thinking the same thing a few days ago.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 11:47 AM
12

Silly menz. "Sexism" is only for wimminz to scream 217 times a day. Won't you ever learn??
/r/MensRights22/05/19 06:52 AM
11

No, men's complements are covert insults. Men's insults are insults too. Everything a man says is highly offensive, you know, so you should react accordingly. Vigilance!
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:30 AM
3

I see such a man every time I look in the mirror, yo. Giggity!
/r/MensRights21/05/19 11:53 PM
1

How much do you want to bet that this laughable ball of projection thinks every man hates her because she's so brilliantly magnificent?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 11:50 PM
1

"You're no different from every other woman on the planet." That's a complement? Oooh, and when a dude says you're pretty? He's saying he thinks every other woman is ugly. Yeah. Every complement is but a sneaky insult directed against every other woman in the world. "You're smart" = "every woman except you is dumb."
/r/MensRights21/05/19 11:48 PM
1

Many reviews for 50 Shades of Grey call Christian Grey the perfect man. $ho¢king.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 10:26 PM
1

"Men are disgusting jerks and they won't commit/buy me drinks."
/r/MensRights21/05/19 10:24 PM
13

"Where is masculinity headed? Let's ask the lesbian, genderfluid and MTFTM experts! Coincidentally, they all loathe those evil fuckers." the global nonprofit ManKind Project says it has close to 10,000 members in 21 nations, is ethnically and socioeconomically diverse and aims to draw men of all ages How wonderful. It doesn't matter your creed, color, orientation or anything else. We're all united in joy at the fact that menz are fucking goddamned evil no matter what they say, think or do. Healt…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 11:07 AM
2

She-peating, though, is but a misogynist construct, dating back to the days of blah-dee-blah-dee-blah. Blah blah blah, blah-dee-blah! Furthermore, blah-dee-blah-dee-blah! In fact, blah-blah-bargle-yargle-bargle! Additionally, burgh-murgha-blurgh-rhubarb-watermelon! Chessmatch, MRA-tard! HAH! Do you ever get tired of losing arguments to me?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 10:14 AM
2

That... haha... the absurdity is multiplying and stacking up to the roof, isn't it.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 10:13 AM
4

Blind to it? I disagree. I simply rationalize it. The chick was wearing a short skirt, so that's why I only gave her 73 out of the 100 rapes that she earned.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:57 AM
4

As "why they like it"? You mean don't assume stuff? Get to know someone before you judge them? Don't assume that a person owning a dick necessarily has the mind of a stupid bone-breaking thug? Huh. Genius. Pure genius.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:48 AM
10

I honesty think that Breaking Bad was one of my favorite TV series, but not because I want to be Walter White, for Pete's sake.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:42 AM
4

I am fairly certain that most fans of Rick & Morty do not regard Rick Sanchez as someone to be emulated. Or maybe I'm wrong. When Suicide Squad came out, there were people arguing that goddamned Harley Quinn is some kind of role model when she's both a victim of the Joker and his willing accomplice, neither of which are particularly desirable things to be.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:40 AM
14

Someone is lying. Obviously the smartphone software was programmed by the patriarchy to simulate a woman lying about being raped because women cannot lie about such things!
/r/MensRights21/05/19 04:54 AM
1

the State legislator who proposed the Alabama Bill (Terri Collins) and the governor who signed the Alabama Bill (Kay Ivey) are both women. And they will ignore you and yell louder.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 01:02 AM
1

People will use it an a sign of men oppressing women. Okay, so after you provide free abortion upon demand, they'll continue complaining about everything else on planet earth as a sign of oppression. Zippers, for instance. Air conditioning. Canned beans. Barometric pressure. The English language. And so on. Seriously, that isn't an argument.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 01:01 AM
9

I'm not into superhero movies generally, but it's apparently sexist for me to dislike this particular one as well.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 11:54 PM
1

She's promising women "something for nothing." Every politician who vows to get tough on the Weidg Giap is promising women that they'll get more pay without working more or working longer or working differently. Something for nothing, babe. Can't go wrong offering that.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 10:19 PM
2

I don't watch the show, but the femmies sure do seem triggered.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 10:13 PM
1

WHARRRRRGARRRRRRRRRRRBLL!!!1!
/r/MensRights20/05/19 10:12 PM
2

In 1985, some unknown person fired a gunshot at his window.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:57 PM
1

I only noticed it the other day.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:56 PM
48

"We don't need no mansplainers! No womb, no opinion! Rah rah grrl pwr! We-- wait wait, hold on- don't leave! We need you to speak up! We need your mentoring! Your support! You yellow bastards! See? I always knew men were no good!"
/r/MensRights20/05/19 12:53 PM
6

I honestly don't think this rises to the sophistication of communism. It's just crude gender-based tribalism. They absolutely believe that it's fine to pay men less than woman. They fucking celebrate whenever that happens.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 12:49 PM
4

This really seems like pandering to me, yes. A big enough chunk of the voters really do think that discrimination is causing the pay differential and she seems to be saying if if two people work "the same job," differences in experience or productivity are not valid reasons for paying them differently. There is absolutely no way that can work, not unless you think someone with 20 years experience is just as valuable as a newbie.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 11:42 AM
19

The U.S. senator from California says $180 billion would be generated over 10 years, with fines decreasing over time as companies strengthen their equal pay practices. I don't think that will work, Kamala. Even if you take the position that "job titles, experience and performance" are irrelevant to determining pay, which is what you will be forced to argue. Oh, and you'll forbid companies from asking about prior pay. That'll go over well. Sure why not forbid companies from asking employees about…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 10:46 AM
50

And what if another feminist says something different? Then you have to say both at the same time! Pffft, stupid man. That kind of thing comes so naturally to women.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:54 AM
12

cutting off women’s access to mentoring and access to senior-level managers is just another form of discrimination and sexism. You hear that, male bosses? You OWE women advancement. You have no choice in the matter. You MUST inhabit the same hotel room as your female underling or you're a misogynist. The next thing you know, you're a misogynist for not hiring a dumb blonde with big tits. Companies need to address this to help women feel confident and comfortable at work, You must install tanning…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:33 AM
22

Oh, she knows. She knows. She is deliberately avoiding the nut of the issue with her smarmy "I dunno." Yeah, those stoopid menz and their stoopid overreactions. They are just impossible to figure out! Gosh, what's going on? Golly gee willikers! ...The Russians deny the existence of their secret stealth missiles, also. The surprise is gone if you admit that you have them. "What missiles, comrade? I don't know what crazy missiles you're talking about!"
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:29 AM
211

Not if you're merely repeating what a feminist tells you to say! If a woman wants your opinion on this matter, she'll yell it at you.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:28 AM
152

Or Justice Blackmun who wrote the Roe v Wade decision. He had no gender, see. And (relatedly) he was the only supreme court justice to have gotten an assassination attempt, but never mind that. It's not even on his Wikipedia page, because who cares.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:22 AM
13

Basically, this. "No uterus, no opinion!!!11!1!!" You can't appease these people. After you give them the Sudetenland, they demand Memel. After they get Memel, they start whining about Danzig.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:21 AM
1

I certainly enjoy fiction and it feels peevish to mock Harry Potter fans or whatever, but that really isn't my preferred genre.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 07:05 AM
5

I'd really like to know why these people aren't interested in learning about real history. The Ottoman and Byzantine Empires? The Vikings? The Germanic wars with Rome? The wars of the Diadochi? The Golden Horde vs the Russian principalities? The Mayans and the Tang dynasty and the Abbasid Caliphate and the Carthaginians and everything else? That stuff is absolutely fascinating.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:18 AM
16

But of course. In fact, it's sexist to NOT deny men education. Gotta make those little monsters pay dearly for having rape-tools between their legs. The vile sneaky bastards. Future oppressors. Future villains. Grrrr! Grrr, I say!
/r/MensRights20/05/19 04:00 AM
3

Of course it's about the patriarchy. Also about the patriarchy: highway tolls, Estonian grammar textbooks, FDA drug trials, artistic glass-blowing, the 2017 World Judo Championships held in Budapest and pico de gallo.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 03:45 AM
4

"But the DEFINITION of feminism is equality" And when you appeal to that, they say the dictionary definition is inadequate. "It's only a small handful of people using the feminist label" And yet they fit in so very well...
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:46 AM
14

Its rampant intellectual dishonesty, hypocrisy, double-standards, illiberal tendencies and presumptions of guilt. And now comes the reply "But but but it's all about equality though!" If only it was about equality, you innocent child.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 01:58 AM
6

The male feminists are allowed to get angry on behalf of women and use their toxic masculinity against other men. That shit is useful once in a while!
/r/MensRights20/05/19 12:01 AM
10

One thing that doesn't get remarked upon much: Feminism fetishizes anger. Anger, in the feminist realm, has a clarifying, cleansing power. "Anger is a tool," as Valenti once said. Cuz you make great decisions when you're angry!
/r/MensRights19/05/19 11:50 PM
7

In fact, men are abusers for even having emotions. A non-controlling man should be stoic and silent in the face of his wife's always-correct rage.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 11:46 PM
3

"If men cause 100% of pregnancies, they can logically take custody of the children and discard the mothers." Now watch her argue against that notion.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:48 AM
5

This article amounts to one of the dumbest piles of drivel I have seen in a very long time. It is beneath mockery.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:45 AM
2

There are multiple factors that go in determining pay. Let's say you have an experienced machinist who has worked for 20 years and then a newly hired machinist comes on board. They're working "the same job" but it would be justifiable to not pay them the same.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:43 AM
31

Yes yes, men aren't mansplaining enough to women because of #MeToo. Women don't need no stinkin' man, but no man should deny women the fruits of their knowledge and labor. No man should speak about abortion, but men need to speak-up and join the fight. The innumerable high-voltage wires seem to be crossing and sparking lately. B'zzt!
/r/MensRights18/05/19 12:33 AM
30

Women need to put themselves first and men need to put women first, sacrificing everything if it must be so. There needs to be total UNITY on this point.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 12:31 AM
58

any man who doesn't want to have work dinners with a woman should also not have work dinners with a man. Yes, it's but a simple little matter! Men should just chuck "freedom of association" into the dustbin of history, right alongside "presumption of innocence," "due process," and "the right to say something unobsequious in the presence of a lady." Sandberg says it and men must meekly obey, for she knows what's best: men cannot choose their own friends as long as a woman is in the room and she s…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 12:04 AM
167

How can movements where men are targeted by potentially false sexual harassment accusations provide an "overwhelmingly positive" impact on the workplace when most male managers are too scared to risk their jobs to help women anymore? Because the benefits (to women) outweigh the costs (to men). That's what matters. The demand seems to be that not only are women allowed to fire at will, but men ought to stand still and not be moving targets. Preferably with big stupid smiles on their faces. The in…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 12:00 AM
39

But not harassing women isn’t enough. No. You have to go beat up a dude if a lady snaps her fingers and tells you to do so.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 11:58 PM
84

But women don't need any mentoring at all, especially from men. Because, you know, they're better than men. That's what the media says for decades. Yup. Now, all of a sudden, it seems they need male sponsorship. Golly. That's not what the grrl pwr types bragged about year after year. They bring their mysterious "women's way of knowing" stuff into the world, an ineffable quality that men simply cannot provide because they're primitive screwheads.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 11:56 PM
1

Haven't read the article, but my prediction: "Chivalry is bad cuz it suggests women are feeble and men only do it to lord their power over us but, atee hee hee, I still like having heavy stuff lifted for me."
/r/MensRights17/05/19 11:06 PM
11

Preceded by the phrase "I'd be crazy to say..."
/r/MensRights17/05/19 10:23 AM
6

In fact, she thinks men ought to have their penises cut-off regardless of their political affiliation.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 08:43 AM
1

This sounds very much in line with stated beliefs, yes.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 04:32 AM
3

I've read Dworkin before. I couldn't escape the impression that she was obviously mentally ill. As for this bit, about her supposed rape in a hotel: Her vivid description of being drugged and raped in Paris is profoundly upsetting to read, and one’s sadness for her only deepens when we learn that this incident was widely dismissed as fantasy, even by her own supporters. Yeah, because it wasn't believable. Not even her psychiatrist believed her, if we read the story. Rather tellingly, that suppos…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 04:16 AM
2

To mollify women's groups on campus, any crazy thing is possible. Men deserve infinite punishment when an accusation is made. I've never had anyone adequately explain to me: what would a feminist-approved rape trial look like? I know how it would end every time-- the verdict would be guaranteed beforehand (though, a lesbian-on-lesbian trial would surely cause real confusion)-- but I just wonder how it would look. Would the defendant wear a dunce cap? Would the defense attorney have duct tape ove…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 01:50 AM
2

Once, Karen Straughan tried to give a talk at a college about "toxic femininity" and the campus women's groups had the talk cancelled because such a topic would be "hate speech." So that's how the subject is treated when it's women on the receiving end.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:54 PM
9

The behavior that gets your face slapped is the same behavior that gets you laid. Men who get their faces slapped a lot also get laid a lot. Instead, they tell you to avoid getting your face slapped. Following that advice guarantees that you can't get laid. The same people will also swear up and down that nothing gets a woman hotter than a dude wearing an apron while pushing a vacuum cleaner.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:09 AM
1

Well modern marriage is (ideally) very much about love. For a long time historically, marriage was very much a business decision and the transfer of property was often the biggest transaction one would see in their lifetimes. Your family had one piece of land, the neighbor had another piece of land, so if you get the kids married, that's a bigger piece of land. In India, it's still very much related to business. In Romeo and Juilet? Remember, they can't be together because the Capulets are havin…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 05:34 AM
1

It ain't gonna be re-genderized.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 11:57 AM
1

Oh hell no. Not any of the films that women like should get remade. Grease? Oh no.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 09:42 AM
6

Oh yeah? Well I say you cannot have a proper World War II movie without a totally diverse cast in which Hitler, Montgomery, Eisenhower, the entire Wehrmacht and British Army are played by obese bisexual Latinas with physical disabilities so bad, they must tool around in whirring motorized wheelchairs and obtain their sustenance from drip bags and tubes up their noses. A shining entertainment future awaits us!
/r/MensRights15/05/19 06:22 AM
0

Grade-A nutbar. Hey, talk about how much you love porn. It triggers him ;)
/r/MensRights15/05/19 12:03 AM
1

Tee hee!
/r/MensRights15/05/19 12:02 AM
1

Boy oh boy, do I love PORN. Wanna hear all about my collection of PORN?? I know how you just love hearing about people's PORR-ORRRRN.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 09:54 PM
12

But but but THAT'S ABUSE!!1
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:32 AM
9

It's been tried in the past, the feminists refused. They don't want men to partner with them, they demand that men sit in the back of the bus, follow feminism's Holy Commands and be quietly obedient. There are no equal partnerships with them, everything needs to be done in their self-serving way. The last two times I tried engaging a feminist in finding common ground, the first one started-off demanding that I go fight the men she told me to go fight and the second one started-off trying to goad…
/r/MensRights13/05/19 06:05 AM
9

Ooh, somebody got pumped & dumped. Tee hee!
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:04 AM
53

At least you're honest about it.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:45 PM
1

Is she being sexually harassed by a strawman? No, she's being sexually harassed by any man who possesses two eyes. The hotties excepted, they're allowed a free grope or two.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 04:33 AM
9

Chicks like these just love to pretend that there is a clear difference between flirting and harassment when there is incredible overlap between the two. And only a woman can decide what it is. A great deal of harassment and flirting is the same behavior with the key factor being the dude's looks. This needs to be denied up and down.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 11:19 PM
5

I dunno, babe- maybe the rules ain't so clear-cut? For instance, only you can decide what is and isn't a tire and only you can decide what is and isn't eating and you're mighty selective in the way you apply your decisions. So we could very well have a situation where an ugly dude is holding a donut (not eating it) and you could have him booked for eating a tire; meanwhile the office stud could chow down on Hankook steel-belted radials and you'd be OK with that. Not to mention, babe, that you yo…
/r/MensRights11/05/19 11:16 PM
5

Actually, that's a rather popular opinion among women. She's totally part of the crowd.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 07:36 AM
2

Begging for the patriarchy's filthy patriarchal money.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 09:59 PM
1

If they want your opinion, they'll scream it at you.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 09:55 PM
2

FFS, why do feminists act as if absolutely nobody ever comprehends what "consent" means and they need to be reminded 46 times a day?
/r/MensRights10/05/19 09:54 PM
15

Yup. And they'd better hold the door open, take their coats and refrain from salty language. Gallantry is very important when you're dealing with a modern slut-goddess who slams tequila shots while getting her septum pierced.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 03:03 AM
8

Non-male? Huh, well I identify as a raspberry-flavored catbeing. Who's to say I'm not? Meow!
/r/MensRights10/05/19 03:02 AM
7

I certainly agree, but team feminism has been pretty adamant that men have no business having opinions about the topic. The only way to comply is to be indifferent.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:48 AM
2

I wonder why so many young men and not getting marriage and raising families. Because they're too lazy to do courtship. See, it used to be that men were too lazy once they got married while the hardworking wife was a perfect angel, but now young dudes are so degenerate they became too lazy to even try to get married. Meanwhile the single ladies are still hardworking, perfect angels.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 11:58 PM
10

2016: Men not showing emotions is toxic masculinity! 2017: Men are needy whiners for showing emotions! 2018: Men not crying is toxic masculinity! It's OK to cry! 2019: Stop crying, you motherfucking man-babies #MaleTears 2020: Real men need to talk about their feelings! I hate it when men won't open up! #StoicBastards 2021: Stupid men won't stop blabbing about their feelings! I hate it when men open up! #AnnoyingBastards 2022: Men won't pay for my dinner because they're cheap assholes. Open up y…
/r/MensRights09/05/19 11:53 PM
12

I've yet to see a feminist offer a distinction between "admiration" and "objectification" which didn't involve the dude being unattractive. I honestly don't think there is a difference apart from the fellow's looks and I have no reason to think otherwise.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 11:58 AM
6

....WHAT?!
/r/MensRights09/05/19 10:34 AM
1

I thought harassment had to be repeated? Unless he's ugly. Ugly dudes should bow their heads and know their proper place. He's not "just" talking to you. He's raping you with his date-asking. Date-ask raping, it's called. The latest atrocity to be unleashed upon womynkind. Is there no end to the fiendish fiendery and the vile vilery?
/r/MensRights09/05/19 07:04 AM
43

Oh no, this will have a chilling effect on deflecting one's unexplained pregnancy.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 05:44 AM
3

How does the government "sexualise" women? Is there mandatory federally-issued lingerie? Is a certain amount of pole dancing required by law? I thought sex-ed in schools was supposed to be vital for women's reproductive whatevers? What on earth is that supposed to be about?
/r/MensRights09/05/19 04:34 AM
7

And common sense tells us that electing a woman as president would deal a smashing symbolic blow to the patriarchy. Presumably, he'd be OK with having Kellyanne Conway being the next POTUS. With VP being Sarah Palin again.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:37 PM
105

She heard that we barbecue cute puppies. It's absolute nonsense, of course. We barbecue cute kitties, not puppies. How hard is that to understand?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 11:38 AM
29

Yeah, but you're gonna need thick skin. Some of us use barbaric, coarse language like "heck" and "golly gosh darn." And we don't return our library books on time. Me, I drop my candy bar wrappers onto sidewalks with a grand cackle of "Hah! Littering! Look at me!" And when we drink chamomile tea, some of us don't even extend our pinkies. We're in total, vulgar rebellion against everything which is good and holy, yo.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 11:35 AM
1

It made me laugh, tho.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 11:56 PM
33

The list doesn't seem to possess any purpose beyond broadcasting generalized contempt. That's how you know it's a message from a bona fide love-goddess: advertised contempt is foremost on her mind.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:38 AM
532

If they come after you, all you need to do is hold up your Patriarchy Member Card and cackle "Male Privilege!" like the evil South African diplomat at the end of Lethal Weapon 2. Then Murtaugh shoots you. In all seriousness, I share your outrage at the institutionalized unfairness.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:29 AM
13

Just remember: Chicks be incoherent, yo.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 03:32 AM
4

Alas her sexual preference is NO and chocolate is better than filthy sex with gross disgusting men, so it's moot. Do you sense her inner love-goddess yet? Such a woman loves everyone and doesn't seem like a hateful douche.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 03:10 AM
243

A love goddess whose sexual preference is NO and who prefers chocolate to sex. Next up: the illiterate reading teacher who prefers burning books.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 02:11 AM
3

Yeah, I've noticed that there is some hostility between branches over doctrinal hair-splitting. Sharing a common hatred is a powerful glue, however.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 12:35 AM
3

some judge will probably see fit to give that person half your shit I don't think that is the underlying reason; to have contempt for a loser overrides any court-related concerns. But maybe that issue is a garnish, like parsley atop the meat and potatoes.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 09:54 PM
4

It seems like it's the slights on feminism that are upsetting you. No, I think he'd be cool with us bullying male feminists. They're expendable pawns, 2nd class folk, mainly useful as meat-shields or court jesters. To go after the truly important feminists with vaginas is quite different.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:57 PM
9

The exploitation of women in Hollywood, where directors were forcing actresses to sleep with them You'll notice that such behavior is universally condemned, not just by feminists. You're on the side of law enforcement as well. Hey, I'm opposed to mass-murderers! Do I get a shout-out for that?
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:54 PM
72

The media usually blames men for being intimidated by powerful women. No, powerful women simply have contempt for low-status men. It really is just that basic. When you're a millionaire woman, there aren't very many multi-millionaire men in the dating pool, so "there are no good men" out there, because anyone beneath you is, ipso facto, not a good man. Women's rejections sometimes have a heavy dose of projection in them. "I don't date short men because short men are insecure about their height,"…
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:46 PM
6

OMG, did you just say that ALL Muslims are terrorists and that ALL feminists hate men? OMG! OHMG! O. MAH. GAH!!!1!!!! (Yes, I'm being facetious; this is precisely the level of stupidity that is inevitably going to pop up).
/r/MensRights06/05/19 12:57 PM
16

Because it is better for equality to be reached when both sides can voice their concerns, and all problems can be solved That's why I'm not a feminist. They're hostile to the notion of one side having a voice. Not their own side, of course.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 12:53 PM
12

Down the drain? All right! We're takin' things to the next level! WHOOT!
/r/MensRights06/05/19 12:39 PM
2

It's a pythonesque joke, sir.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 11:20 AM
1

Upvote for the Python reference. I'll kill you last, friend.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 09:52 AM
1

No no, they just want men who are "at the top of their field!" They want men who are "successful!" They want men who are "career-oriented!" Not "rich," that would be a venal, gold-digging thing to want. I puked a bit in my mouth just then.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 09:51 AM
5

20 years ago, this would have been too far-fetched for MAD Magazine.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 09:49 AM
5

I'm sure that feminists everywhere will drop their opposition to the Pence rule, now that she has explained the necessity for it. No, it's totally rational when women keep away from men. It's never right for a man to be like that. It's completely immoral for a man like Pence to not dine with female interns. In fact, Pence should be required to have private dinners with female interns on a regular basis so that they can benefit from... yanno, whatever he can do for them. Pence doesn't need to ben…
/r/MensRights06/05/19 06:10 AM
2

One women quoted in the press release reflected that a job was a sign that a man was involved in something, which could indicate a desire for a partner who is active and purposeful, rather than one who would take on the traditional role of the sole breadwinner. Ahhahahaha... Yeah, yeah. Also, they love "ambition" in a man. Ambition is a total aphrodisiac. It drives the ladies wild. "Hey, baby. Check out my giant, throbbing enthusiasm for being productive. Smokin' hot, innit?"
/r/MensRights06/05/19 06:03 AM
5

She does, but she only orgasms from spite.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 05:36 AM
1

I haven't used /s in years.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:55 AM
15

Heh. I had a girlfriend who, before moving in with me, said "I'll totally get a job and help pay for things! I wanna work and earn my own money! I totally totally do!" 8 months later, it was: "I've changed my mind, I wanna be a full time mom. You gotta support me from now on, cuz that's your job." What can you say except, "Get the hell out"? It was a 180 degree reversal and she really did think I had to happily swallow it no matter what.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:43 AM
28

Because of misogyny! There can be no other reason!
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:20 AM
14

No, Erica. It's perfectly standard boilerplate, regular issue, coin of the realm, daily routine, the major export. Hypocrisy, lies, double standards and insults are their 4 major food groups with a big bowl of smug for dessert. Men in a field = BAD. Woman in a field = GOOD. 100% white chicks = diversity. Yay ovaries, boo testicles. Up is down, hot is cold, Joanie is Chachi.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:11 AM
1

Oh no, it's sexist to punish a woman. /s
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:08 AM
7

Next time, there will be an article all about how men don't care about their partner's pleasure because they're selfish turds.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 12:49 AM
4

There are some women out there who pride themselves on being good in bed or giving good blowjobs or whatever. I don't see any men ever writing peevish, snide, snotty articles about how egotistical and wrong it is for a woman to like being good at pleasing her partner.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 12:39 AM
3

Yeah, they think women work twice as hard. Women work twice as hard for half the pay!11!!11 For proof they cite... they, uh, cite... uh, they cite... they... uh... hmuh muh muh... ... sorry, I gotta go take the brownies out of the oven.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 08:05 AM
14

I think you might be confusing a small group with a large group Yeah, he shouldn't generalize criticism about feminism. But generalized praise about feminism is 100% fine, yes?
/r/MensRights05/05/19 07:44 AM
10

So they should get to work on closing the modelling gender pay gap. It's OK, bro. Menhz are getting the shit end of the stick so it's cool.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 07:42 AM
20

I thought looks weren't supposed to matter, miss plus-sized body-poz?
/r/MensRights05/05/19 07:39 AM
3

One thing that I find really toxic about the whole "privilege" argument is its obvious moral endorsement of treating certain categories of people badly. For instance, it logically follows that white privilege could be nullified by having the police shoot white people more often than they currently do. No one suggests that out loud, but that seems to be an implication. The endpoint of the "privilege" argument really is a certain kind of discrimination. And even if that isn't the intended endpoint…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 07:39 AM
1

Oh, stop it. I'm goddamned hideous. I like scaring the children.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 07:24 AM
1

He was a smart dude, no doubt about that.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 07:22 AM
3

And get their hands dirty? Oh no, they demand that men should cut their own balls off. With a smile.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 12:36 PM
2

I don't agree with everything he says, but he's capable of grabbing a young leftist's wrist and pummeling the kid in the face with the kid's own fist.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 11:00 AM
2

This was a good find. It's way too goddamned easy for a rich woman to portray herself as oppressed.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 10:45 AM
5

Being an old time eastern-bloc European who grew up under fuggin' Marshal Tito, he doesn't exactly understand the intricacies of today's young, hip, green-haired, quadruple nose-ring, "use my preferred pronouns," "rape culture stole my body" leftist set. You can even date co-workers in his culture without getting fired (gasp!) so it's a totally different universe. The the reason why #Metoo and political correctness don't touch hard economic issues is because that stuff is hard! It might actually…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 10:15 AM
3

“I was referring to men who rape women or men who think it’s funny to graffiti and vandalise a woman’s memorial after she’s been raped and murdered, that of course, sir, is not all men, I’m talking about the men who behave like that,” Hanson-Young replied." Ah, so she thinks there are five or six exceptions out there. Mincing gay men, for instance. And Muslims. But not the Bosnian Muslims, they're kind of pale.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 10:13 AM
5

No no, see-- women are so oppressed and men have such a giant surplus of stuff in their gigantic Mael Privluj toyboxes that emptying-out the whole toybox into women's deserving hands is but a fraction of what the poor little darlings are owed. 10 million years of eeeevil patriarchal oppression sure does comes in handy sometimes. Hee! Women need Infinity Free Stuff to be equal! So you'd better write a big-ass check today.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:13 AM
3

you are the ideological deviant and Prof. Walters is one of the 'respectable' people. She's an intellectual giant because her vagina is chock full o' wisdom! AHEM. Zero-sum game. No no no, "zero-sum games" are bad and her intentions are pure, therefore she's not into those. She's just recognizing it has to be 50-50 and men have to give up half their stuff-- they don't deserve it cuz they get free stuff for having penises, like the free drinks men get in nightclubs-- so women can run off with fre…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 05:51 AM
4

They could refuse to give interviews to news organizations that have practiced gender discrimination in their coverage of the campaigns According to you, all media is like that. Gender and racial equity are not zero-sum games: Which is why men have to give up half their stuff and do more stuff for women while women drink piña coladas poolside. It's all about equality, atee hee hee!
/r/MensRights01/05/19 05:48 AM
72

"Man hating? What man hating? I certainly don't see any man hating..."
/r/MensRights01/05/19 01:26 AM
1

The only way she could possibly make them sound worse is by making a detailed description of the crayon art adorning the living room walls.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 01:25 AM
2

She makes it sound like a pretty valid choice. I don't see a problem here. It's almost as if she'd leave her kids behind too, if she could.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 01:24 AM
5

"Ron Swanson" is the name of a fictional, comically manly-man character from some TV show. It's a funny character, but I imagine this "journalist" chose it for a reason.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 01:15 AM
4

"ronswanson," eh? Sounds like a person who really respects men and totally doesn't see them as meatheaded boobs.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 11:51 PM
1

But if I came here and laughed at men being raped and falsely accused of rape it would be a different story Not really, that's basically the standard reaction. We are used to it, you melty snowflake. You don't know what a joke is. That's who you are. That's how malfunctioning your mind is. You don't know what a joke is. You can't tell the difference between someone who is being unserious and someone who is being serious. You, whoever you are, have a broken brain. Or, to put it in words you can u…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 01:45 PM
2

People were laughing but the boys were serious If they were so serious, why were people laughing? It was a joke. Got it? It was a joke. It was not meant seriously. And people make jokes about alllll kinds of topics, you know. There are jokes about crime. There are jokes about religion. There are jokes about every topic you can imagine. And they are not meant to be taken seriously, you incoherent idiot. You write like a person who is too stupid to tie their own shoelaces and who is too crazy to t…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 07:40 AM
2

So this fool in your class, the one who remarked that the girl owed her rescuer her virginity... did people chuckle at that remark as if it was a joke? Like it was a jest or a witticism? Like, something not meant to be taken seriously? Because that's how it sounds to me. People probably didn't react by nodding their heads with reverent agreement, I imagine.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 05:57 AM
2

Today, I went around asking 50 random dudes "Do you feel entitled to women's bodies?" and 100% of them said "no." If that's not more valid a method than overhearing a single moron cracking a joke in your class, then what is? And have you sought professional help yet? You really need it.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 11:38 PM
24

“The only thing this has taught me is that men are gross and they don’t deserve opinions and I categorically do not want to f*** them.” Ahh, she sounds absolutely qualified for the post. The only thing she's missing are quotes from Julius Streicher with "Yiddish" replaced by "mansplaining." “as director of Gender Relations, I would want to make sure that we have discussions about how to relate to other genders on campus in ways that don’t make people feel alienated or hurt or sad or scared,” Jus…
/r/MensRights29/04/19 07:25 AM
1

Basically, if you feel that you're being mocked, you're allowed to machine-gun comic artists and Jewish supermarkets. Only if you say the Shahada first! They're magic words! And, like, it's Islamophobic to suggest there's anything wrong with that but of course they're gonna kill you if you mock them, so watch your mouth.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 11:15 PM
2

Christina: "...so there's a double-standard there." Audience: "Booooooooooooo!" Moderator: "Do you have anything to add, Roxanne?" Roxanne: (Farts loud and juicy) Audience: "YAYYYYYYYY!!!"
/r/MensRights28/04/19 11:12 PM
3

I said "nutcase," not "nut." And you, "james," are making the exact same kinds of writing mistakes that the nutcase is making. Seek professional help.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 01:04 AM
2

Nope, I don't know anyone who thinks that they are entitled to women's bodies. And this is what you are. You complete nutcase you. Seek professional help.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 12:57 AM
3

I don't know anybody who thinks that they are. On the other hand, I know plenty of women who think they're entitled to men's assistance, money, labor, etc etc etc. So you might wanna look in the mirror before throwing your snark around.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 12:01 AM
15

What do you think about toxic waste?
/r/MensRights26/04/19 09:32 AM
2

Asking a feminist about it isn't going to yield an honest answer. The ideology sees male/female relations as a form of oppressor/oppressed dynamic. That's its starting point and everything else flows from that. The ideology isn't conducive to love or trust. They'd argue, for instance, that you cannot have a mutually agreed-upon division of labor because every agreement would be suspect due to the inherent oppression of the dynamic.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 03:10 AM
2

There's nothing particularly crazy about working-out a mutually agreed-upon division of labor. This isn't rocket science. I'm not a stranger to cleaning up, I've done my own laundry since I was twelve. A feminist-designed relationship is based upon resentment, one-sided blame and chronic offense-taking. I don't see how that's a great idea.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 01:40 AM
2

All I can say is that were I to offer a relationship to a woman in which she'd work full time while I stayed at home and vacuumed once in a while, I don't think she'd be very enthusiastic about taking that deal. I'd be a "lazy bum" for acting in the traditional female role. Obviously, that is because men are so oppressive. There can be no other reason.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 12:59 AM
4

Personally, I'm fine with it. How do women feel about the notion of needing to financially support a husband who would take the traditional female role? Well, a lot of them absolutely hate that idea. Why don't you go ask them? Maybe you could note it down and write a little paper about how it's men's fault? The more creatively you blame men for it, the better!
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:51 PM
1

"Thank god you're here, Captain Diabetic with your sidekick Donut Devourer!"
/r/MensRights25/04/19 09:57 PM
1

they don't respect a man's right to spend his money where he chooses to. Nope. "You're not entitled to customers" seems rather fitting for this lot.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 09:53 PM
7

Oh, goody. This sounds like it'll be really productive. Ever heard of the 2006 Duke Lacrosse rape hoax? The behavior of high-profile feminists in the media throughout the entirety of that case illustrated that feminist jurisprudence is opposed to due process for individuals accused of sexual assault. It was a very instructive thing on display for anyone who was paying attention. So that's my primary objection right there: Feminist jurisprudence presumes guilt. Full stop. Feminist jurisprudence l…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 08:05 AM
6

including fat superheros. I thought X-Men already had The Blob? Granted, Roxanne Gay has yet to develop superpowers, but she certainly has multiple signs of being a mutation.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 07:20 AM
2

The place got a hilariously lousy review from a guy on Tripadvisor.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 03:56 AM
2

You know what is really funny about that photograph of the stage? Let's say you didn't know who was who and I were to ask you "Guess which one of those people in the picture is the radical feminist lunatic?" You'd probably be able to answer the question correctly on the first try.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 01:06 AM
2

"That's because society forces us to wear push up bras! See the oppression of patriarchy, comrades?!?!"
/r/MensRights25/04/19 01:02 AM
9

Rule #3 respect goes both ways,” Narrator: "Not in this shop, however."
/r/MensRights25/04/19 12:56 AM
8

So they called men cowards for not manning-up and getting gouged like gallant cannon fodder. As insults go, that's a pretty traditionalist, White Feather Campaign appeal to patriarchal gender roles. How easy it is for a feminist lady to dress up in the oppressive petticoat, bustle and bodice when convenient.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 12:53 AM
17

So you're calling the feminist a liar!? HOW DARE YOU!??!!
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:45 AM
8

"Don't teach people to lock their doors when they leave the house. Teach burglars not to burgle." - No one in their right mind.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:50 AM
3

Desh says that prices were higher than usual because of Gay’s large fee Also, they had to pay for the extra lumber to reinforce the stage and the 2.5 tonnes of M&Ms and 54 gallons of maple syrup she eats for breakfast every day. It requires an industrial-sized blending vat to prepare, too. “Surely we can have a class that shows young men how not to victimize,” Gay responded, eliciting raucous cheers. A minute later, she reiterated that idea: “Really, all of these problems could be solved by men …
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:55 AM
11

Nah, it's cool. Just identify as a 12 foot tall Malaysian woman. Only a bigot would tell you you're not.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 07:22 AM
4

"You're not entitled to men's assistance."
/r/MensRights23/04/19 03:04 AM
4

It's striking how often a feminist resembles a sociopath with a thin excuse.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 01:26 AM
4

Clearly the biological male enjoying zimself was the real problem. He was contaminated by his disgusting maleness. The taint can never wash off, no matter how many layers of skin he is forced to scrub-away in the decontamination shower with strong brushes and weak acid.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 01:22 AM
5

It saddens me to see how a place I thought was inclusive and progressive could turn out to be as radical and rejecting of diversity as most places are. Nope, it was a feminist place. Sorry.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 01:19 AM
10

When convenient, they'll sneer at that, too.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 12:22 AM
35

Oh good. They dislike traditional masculinity, except for the self-sacrifice where you foolishly put your life and money on the line to stand-up for the weak little ladies. That traditional stuff can stick around. Also positive masculinity: buying diamonds and fur coats for lady psychiatrists.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 12:15 AM
1

Nonsense. 100% white girls is diverse enough. The one in the back even has a suntan, so there's the melanin.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 04:22 AM
21

She seemed to think that looking up his records was her being a cute lil' stinker, a tee hee hee. "All's fair when you're a scorned bitch!" She had no idea how it made her look to people outside her little UGoGrrrl circlejerk.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 01:00 AM
47

So a woman who is hostile and resentful towards men is hostile and resentful that a man wasn't interested in putting-up with her hostility and resentment. Oh no, destroy that dude. What an evil, stupid, weakling serial killer terrorist loser supervillain he must be.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 12:17 AM
5

I remember reading a statistical study from the late 80s suggesting very persuasively that there was a de facto cap on Asian student admissions at certain U of California schools. The belief was that if you didn't penalize Asian students in that system, they would crowd-out all the other groups. And when voters removed racially-based admission criteria in the late 1990s, Asian acceptance rates soared for those schools in the next few years. Almost as if stopping discrimination means you stop dis…
/r/MensRights19/04/19 10:20 AM
3

Hey, a hundred years ago? That remarkably vivacious-looking 135 year old couldn't vote! I must say I'm impressed that her body hasn't collapsed into a pile of dust yet. Somehow, despite being denied the ballot, she's found the secret to immortality.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 10:11 AM
7

your paycheck might somehow be smaller than a maayaaaan that does the same job If you do "the same job" for 8 hours a day vs his 10 hours a day-- and you take long lunch breaks for your all-vital yoga time-- I guess that's a mere technicality with no bearing on your pay or promotions. "Somehow" the paychecks are different. Must be discrimination. Fuckin' patriarchy, (p'tui!)
/r/MensRights19/04/19 10:07 AM
4

If so, that is quite rare. The “what causes rapes?" sign, IS the sentiment that I normally see in the "rape culture" narrative: that women never report regretted sex as rape, that alcohol plays no role in clumsy drunken hookups therefore women can never be faulted for drinking 9 vodka shots and rendering themselves vulnerable, that the fault is 100% on "rapists" (ie: men by default) etc etc. The context could be plausibly read in precisely the opposite fashion.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 09:19 AM
8

The sex is caused by men inserting their pee-pees into women, and the women are silent and unmoving, like 9-toed sloths hooked on barbituates. All sex is rape, in other words. There is no two ways about it. In all seriousness, this loony-tunes chick can go gargle a bunch of thumbtacks and paint thinner.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 05:19 AM
37

Maybe a certain percentage of women are bullshitting about being raped? Because that's a distinct possibility. Unless she is suggesting here that pretty much every man is a rapist but bullshits about not being one. And I do think she is implying that very heavily.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 03:23 AM
6

What if you have a very stupid woman who pleasures herself all alone in a room with a turkey baster full of cum kept in a fridge? Is the sperm donor still the cause of the dumb chick's unwanted pregnancy?
/r/MensRights19/04/19 03:21 AM
4

Presumably, the author also thinks that fathers own the fetuses within women's tummies and he should therefore compel a woman to give birth? She should be consistent. If she's against abortion for the woman but for ascribing guilt to the man, she should also ascribe ownership to the man for the child (indeed, she would do that for the sake of imputing child support). And ownership over the woman's body for the duration of the pregnancy (at least), meaning he has every right to control what she e…
/r/MensRights19/04/19 02:28 AM
14

"Hey Asian doods, take one for the team! Thanx a lot luv u buhbye aheeheehee!" Sincerely, White girls.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 02:03 AM
8

I couldn't watch more than 40 seconds. Seriously, you sat through half an hour of this numpty's babbling?
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:49 AM
3

So she's been raped without being raped. Second-Hand Rape. I can assume that this woman was either conceived as a result of a rape-- for there can be no other way a penis can enter a vagina-- or conceived in a test tube, which is the only kind of non-rape-conceived embryo there is.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:46 AM
6

Why on earth would she name these men and try to get the internet to “do some detective work” and go after them? Because everyone online just lives to follow her orders. She's too busy masterminding her Grrl Genius ideas to actually do the hard work of Feminist Utopia-Building. Imagining the Utopia is what she does, it's up to the rest of us to start pouring the concrete and reforming our behavior according to her diktat.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:42 AM
1

It's not real or scientific, yet it's presented as fact. It's an opinion, asserted without proof; it always seemed highly dubious to me.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 01:57 AM
5

Are airplane seats designed for men? I've never heard a man saying after a long flight "wow, that seat was just perfect for my frame." Christ almighty, condoms don't even fit every man perfectly the same.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 01:52 AM
9

The feminists like to pretend that crying fixes problems for men. No, it does not. Performative crying might work for women, it does not for men. To not know this? My god.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 05:02 AM
14

"It's okay to cry" LIAR Of all the lies the feminists peddle, that's among the most irritating.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 03:31 AM
2

the entirety of the University woman's studies programs The pro-sex feminists disagree, mainly so that they can feel brave and wonderful about their fucking. Men, though, are safe to slut-shame and accuse of perversion.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 02:19 AM
1

So that's what I want to be when I grow up-- a bad train man! Or, failing that, a bad man on a train.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 01:37 AM
8

Yes, but since women cannot consent to sex within the confines of paytreeurckee, all children are conceived through rape, surely?
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:48 PM
13

"Don't point your eyes at women if you're below average-looking! Ah-durr!"
/r/MensRights15/04/19 09:16 AM
3

Why am I single and childless? Who cares what you have to say? Let's go ask the lesbian experts on masculinity and see their lengthy opinions about why you're useless scum....
/r/MensRights15/04/19 03:47 AM
4

"No, it's all very simple! Just don't fuck someone who is passed out! Why is that so very very hard for you mehnz to comprehend???!"
/r/MensRights15/04/19 12:22 AM
75

Look, feminists don't understand science. Their attitude towards science is like their attitude towards sports: they see it as territory to be won, and you win by getting attention. And the attention doesn't need to be earned, credit just needs to be attributed. They don't see the point of sports, but they absolutely love to see women getting medals. The corollary is that if you cannot win territory, you can at least deny it to the enemy. If a woman can't get all of the credit for something, men…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 11:16 PM
24

I think it's time for Holly to explain why she's raped so many men. I assume she didn't ask them for enthusiastic consent every single time? Hmm?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 10:37 AM
4

The only black hole that feminists really care about is the one between the female scientist's legs.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 04:58 AM
8

Well, now it's turned to "online racists trashing poor victim supergenius white girl." Before the end of the month, she'll outshine Einstein escaping Nazi Germany.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:11 AM
15

The shirt got more attention than the goddamned comet landing. Thanks, feminists!
/r/MensRights12/04/19 12:25 AM
18

So empowered, yet such a victim... shes wins by losing and loses by winning.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 11:57 PM
13

Yeah, I kind of noticed the hyping of this woman. Anyone with a mind can see that this was a global project and she was involved with one part of a project involving many people. As she herself has said. She was absolutely not the mastermind of the whole thing. There are enough people in the media who badly wish to push-back upon a supposed "bias against women in STEM" to the extent that they will seek-out a female in STEM and automatically prop her up on a booster-seat and go whole hog biased i…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 11:53 PM
15

"the people denying you the reward for your hard-earned work, solely because you're a man, are your actual friends." Creepy. I, too, have found it a bit ghoulish the way that feminists sometimes insist that they are men's true friends because they believe that men can be far better people than the pieces of shit they currently are. They have the cure for your disgusting toxicity, see, and they know what's best for you. With friends like those, you don't need enemies.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 05:32 AM
18

That's precisely the wrong place to ask for help. They very badly want men to fail. It's like the three little pigs asking the local wolf pack for advice.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 03:51 AM
5

Just because she feels free to throw herself at athletes doesn't mean that athletes can do the same to her. I mean, sheesh, the ladies have a sacred right to flash titties. It doesn't give men the right to look.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:58 AM
3

You seem worth reading. Do you publish a monthly newsletter?
/r/MensRights08/04/19 01:37 PM
26

This chick is the stupid equivalent of Einstein. She deserves a Stupid Nobel Prize for Dumbfuckery.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:32 AM
2

"The patriarchy made them do it!"
/r/MensRights06/04/19 01:20 PM
601

Teach women not to murder their children!!11!!!! Women need to be taught how not to kill their kids!!111!!! Fight child-murder culture!!1111!!! Etc! Etc!
/r/MensRights06/04/19 12:24 AM
1

There are a great many feminist-authored books saying as much. They certainly don't go-around on their missionary crusade of converting womankind because they assume that normal people are all already feminist.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 10:46 PM
3

Whatever she is citing is missing a lot of factors, undoubtedly.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 12:49 PM
58

If women are making less, it’s really because of their choices.'” Why is that such an outrageous notion? But about a third of the pay gap is “unexplained.” Oh, it MUST be discrimination then! Open and shut! There can be no other factors involved. Women were more likely to cite unconscious bias and sexism, while men were more likely to say it was because women work fewer hours than men and are “generally in careers that don’t pay as much.” With "unconscious bias" conveniently being impossible to …
/r/MensRights04/04/19 09:16 AM
4

The only time I ever hear anyone say "they were asking for it" nowadays, it is feminists trying to be cute lil' sarcastic snarkies, a tee hee hee.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 09:12 AM
2

They get free food, free rent, free clothing etc. Doesn't count! DOESN'T COUNT!!! DOESN'T COUNT WARRRGRRBL!!!11!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights04/04/19 02:14 AM
2

just acknowledges that it exists. And it doesn't acknowledge all the other stuff which exists alongside it. A one-sided acknowledgement is a lie by ommission.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 02:13 AM
6

Housewives are just people who do work take risk of injury but don't get paid. When I was living on my own, I put laundry in the dryer too. So where's my paycheck? I also drove my girlfriend around a lot, don't I deserve to get paid for being her chauffeur as well? (Sounds kind of stupid when a man makes that kind of demand, doesn't it?)
/r/MensRights04/04/19 02:10 AM
3

People don't consider my hobbies to be work either. I break a real sweat watching baseball on the idiot-box and eating Cool Ranch Doritos, don't I deserve to be compensated for that?
/r/MensRights04/04/19 02:08 AM
2

Those men have women at home doing housework and child rearing. Even the single men living alone have women at home doing that for them? Damn, mehnz must be genius-level slavemasters!
/r/MensRights04/04/19 02:07 AM
43

"Normal person"? But I thought one of the main pillars of feminism is that normal people are sexist with feminists being the enlightened few.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 02:03 AM
2

I enjoy those noodle-like appendages.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 12:46 AM
1

It does if you're a grrrl! A tee hee hee!
/r/MensRights03/04/19 10:48 PM
6

So this will teach me how to be an angry white man? Awesome, I'm in!
/r/MensRights03/04/19 10:47 PM
7

This crude propaganda is truly wearisome. Do you "take into consideration" that women at City might not be working in exactly the same way as the men working the same job? You own a business and you employ a machinist with 20 years of experience but due to a large and sudden rush order, you need to hire a brand new machinist to help out. Do you have to pay them the same, even though they're "doing the same job"? Are the differences irrelevant? I really get tired of the boring, stale thought-term…
/r/MensRights03/04/19 01:04 AM
3

I've never read anything you've ever written. Unless there are boobz involved.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 10:38 AM
8

This dude is a true nutcase. Do not make me read his nonsense again, man.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 10:35 AM
14

It's not equality when men emerge with a boon. Don't be silly. Boons are for women only.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 11:15 AM
96

It wasn't obviously a joke. It came out before April 1st.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 10:47 AM
8

I wouldn't leave a gerbil with our darling Clementine.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 03:01 AM
2

They will not gonna stop this insanity until some people will actually get hurt... sadly. Oh, you watch, those will be acceptable losses and this'll continue despite people dying needlessly.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 10:45 PM
2

Made me think of that very tall dude on the Simpsons driving the tiny car. "Do you find something comical about my appearance?"
/r/MensRights31/03/19 10:44 PM
9

Yeah. No darkness. No shadows. Uh, maybe sharp corners could be removed from all buildings so that women don't poke themselves in the eye or "feel threatened by sharp corners" or whatever. The city should be less pointy all around. Make every building a geodesic dome! Ooh, and light the sky by an artificial sun so that there's no darkness. Instead of making buildings out of steel and concrete, which are cold, unyielding, permanent and so very male materials (boo!), we should instead build skyscr…
/r/MensRights31/03/19 04:20 AM
11

not allowing for the fact that a woman or child might be smaller and less able to tolerate wind. Okay, so let's use 9 year old children as the default and make it so that grown-ups can't fit through any doors. At least it wouldn't be sexist if grown women and men both have to cram themselves into an elevator half the size of a fridge. It's equally inconvenient for both sexes, so it's fair. with the boys colonizing the space as they got bigger. What the fuck does this even mean?? They surely don'…
/r/MensRights31/03/19 03:30 AM
1

height increasing surgery(it does exist)=breast enlargement A chick with a boob job can walk fairly quickly afterwards. The leg-lengthening surgery makes it so you can't walk for months, and that is part of the reason that it is truly rare. That equal sign doesn't seem exactly apropos.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 02:16 AM
2

Height supremacists.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 01:41 PM
3

There's just not enough 6-ft multimillionaire/surfer-boy/astronaut/Congressional Medal of Honor recipients with honey-brown hair, the chin of Val Kilmer and an apartment overlooking Central Park to go around.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 01:40 PM
9

Well, you're gonna have a lot of disappointed ladies if there are too many 5'10" shorties out there. Which is the actual average height, by the way, sorry you 6'2"+ fetishists, even though that is an absolute must-have for the woman of today.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 10:02 AM
1

If you can find a woman who wants that deal, just let me know. I won't hold my breath, though. My sister divorced her husband after she started to out-earn him and he decided to start acting a bit like a wife. That's when he became a "lazy bum" in her eyes for acting like a wife. I just find that interesting, that when a man starts acting a teeeeny little bit like a wife, he's a lazy bum and is suddenly not a good partner. Being a "lazy bum" is a wife's job, I guess. Men didn't make that rule, w…
/r/MensRights30/03/19 01:39 AM
2

Would you like a man who didn't do those things? Seriously, you go and work full time, pay all the bills and take respsonsibility for both of us. Me? I'll stay at home, straighten-up occasionally and stick bread in the toaster for you most mornings. Sound good?
/r/MensRights29/03/19 11:41 PM
1

I'm not floored, to be feminist is to openly embrace double-standards. Rationalized double-standards. Just say "the patriarchy made me do it" and your every indiscretion, crime or bout of assholery is justified.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 11:07 PM
5

You mean her career wasn't ended?? You mean the person saying these words is an ignoramus or a liar or both?
/r/MensRights29/03/19 10:58 PM
3

That's it. An open and shut case of flat-out misogyny!11!! /s
/r/MensRights29/03/19 10:57 PM
4

(The suits cost about $12 million each and take a lot of time to construct). Cheap-ass patriarchy doesn't want to spend the money. Well I say that no price should be too high!
/r/MensRights29/03/19 10:55 PM
1

This is how the patriarchy prevents rape victims from getting justice!!11!! /s obv
/r/MensRights29/03/19 10:18 PM
11

the compelling, age appropriate argument that girls and boys are equal, plain and simple. And yet it's not so simple when you get down to specifics, like why girls are allowed to slap or perhaps unwantedly kiss boys for fun but never the other way around. The whole "girls are special" behavior you evince during the daytime doesn't really square with the message you wish to impart at storytime.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 03:48 AM
1

In the first case, the people populating the pool of clauses would be the lawyers. This is the thing I don't entirely get. A typical will doesn't need to be elaborate. Notarizing items is just a routine, rote task that busy offices cut corners on doing all the time. In a law office, it's pretty common for someone to need something notarized in a hurry, so they run down the hall and find some secretary who can stamp it, and the secretary won't read the thing or even remember doing it 5 months lat…
/r/MensRights26/03/19 04:28 AM
1

Interesting analysis. I've always imagined that a great deal of legal work could be automated. Basic contracts and wills aren't that hard to draw-up, for instance. Notarization? If the point is to witness a document being signed to deter fraud, why can't a notarization kiosk be created which notes an ID and recognizes your face and videos you signing the document before it stamps it? Furthermore, a human notary could potentially have a conflict of interest, if you misidentify the signatory you c…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 11:38 PM
6

You are correct. The fear seems to be that if a difference in sex drive were acknowledged, it would be telling women that they have a pathetic libido. And since that's insulting, it cannot be said. We must, instead, push lady-flattering myths, and any nonsense will do. For instance, we all have to pretend that women are total hornballs, but sexism is what stops them from going ahead and fucking every cock they see. Oh, and men are disgusting perverts for even saying the word "sex," but women are…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:56 PM
1

How hard is it to just NOT RAPE PEOPLE? Well, if you're determined to change your mind well after you've had consensual sex and call that a "rape", then it's going to be impossible for someone to not rape you. It's your choice really! If you really want, every consented-to sex act that you've ever enjoyed in your life can, with a bit of historical revision, be a terrible rape that you've suffered. Just say the word and POOF, your every sexual experience is now a rape! Tee hee! Isn't this thought…
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:40 AM
3

Not even consent is consent enough for these farkwads.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 10:35 AM
1

Heh. I felt like I'd be beating a dead horse.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 12:02 AM
36

Exculpating evidence might expose the phoniness of a claim, and since everybody knows that phony claims cannot exist, the procedure needs to be organized around the phoniness of a phony claim never being exposed. So a text showing consent is but a "short skirt," the damsel being blamed for giving consent. It's all very convoluted, this simplicity.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 01:07 AM
15

Absolutely. The ladies get to go and party. Traditional duties? Oh, men need to uphold those. Sanctity of holy marriage and all that.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 11:32 PM
4

Fuck for virginity! Pave the environment!
/r/MensRights23/03/19 11:07 PM
26

Marriage benefits men and not women Stopped reading there, LOL... I love how men's improved lifespan in marriage is a sign of benefiting from the situation, but men's lower comparative lifespan within "patriarchy" means goddamned nothing.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 11:04 PM
1

You're addressing the wrong people by posting this here.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 11:02 PM
3

In practice, consent is whatever a woman says that it is, Jordan. A hot, handsome enough celebrity hunk can grab a woman from behind, say "I'm gonna fuck you, bitch" and he can ravish the hell out of her at a party, without her saying absolutely anything, and that's considered A-OK, consent given, because she decided she'd given consent in that instance. And the next week, an ugly dude can make a clumsy pass at her and that's an attempted rape, because she decided it was so. And then, she can ch…
/r/MensRights23/03/19 01:13 AM
3

I look forward to the inevitable "it's perfectly healthy and natural for a boy to saw-off his own dick" comic.
/r/MensRights23/03/19 01:01 AM
3

It's appreciated. The past year has been a whirlwind of work.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 02:48 AM
4

“whining about being a success object” simply means "men don't like their jobs," Hanisch wrote No. That's not what it means. It has to do with women's valuing of men for their income and little else. To not understand this is to not know how to read. It would be like me saying "all of this whining about being a 'sex object' is just women having low libidos" which would open the inevitable floodgates about me "not getting it." So, yes Hanisch, you "don't get it."
/r/MensRights20/03/19 01:45 AM
6

Men without kids and nagging wives get to do that even moreso, methinks.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 06:56 AM
1

This person has a broken brain. A lot of languages have slang for sexual body parts as well. Gift her a fucking anatomy book or a multilingual slang book something.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 06:13 AM
6

I love how some women seem to think that they're just so gosh darned cute by accusing people of raping them and lying to police. "A tee hee hee! I got someone jailed! A tee hee hee! I am soo clever! A tee hee hee!"
/r/MensRights13/03/19 11:02 PM
9

Nor do either of you get to tell me what to do. Funny how that works, huh? If you act like a child, you get treated like one. Not very funny at all, actually.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 11:30 AM
9

Failed gif insert, so sue me. Regardless, I think you've had enough Internet for one day and should step away from the computer.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:40 AM
8

....whatever. The old "pick your battles" adage means nothing nowadays.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:37 AM
14

This individual deserves a presumption of good faith. Ease off, man. Lordy.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:28 AM
42

I feel that it has poisoned the relationship between the sexes, I feel the same way. It doesn't matter how well you look-after the women in your life, you get sneered at and called a total asshole anyway. All right, I shouldn't bother and I'm subhuman scum regardless of what I say or do. Thanks, ladies.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 09:46 AM
1

I think you've basically described things realistically. You are expected to fall into line, provided that your way of being gay serves women. You are expected to let loud bachelorette parties run wild on your dance floor. In fact, I think that gay men are in a slow process of being demoted within the pyramid. as the absurd diversity quota will probably reserve a few plumb spots for some effeminate white gay guy, but nearly as much. I don't see how it would be possible to have such a quota, unle…
/r/MensRights13/03/19 01:01 AM
7

Let me know when a sperm can gestate into a fully-formed human. Then, you'd be doing something beyond trolling. Oh, also, let me know when women are to be held financially liable for men's ejaculations.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 12:44 AM
3

This is what's called being hoist by one's own petard. You made this sort of lawfare acceptable. But but but that's women's sword! It's dirty pool for men to pick-up women's sword and use it! Ungallant! Unchivalrous! Underhanded! It's just so goddamned filthy when men go ahead and just do what women do.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:39 PM
3

How can "rhetoric" be used to "punish" women? Ohh, I see, the complaint is that MRAs are going to court to enforce equality to "punish women." So actual equal treatment before the law-- to treat women as a man-- "punishes" women. That's the truthful complaint. especially in certain fields, like science, tech, engineering, and math. Any fields outside of those? No? Ohh, no wait, to ask that would show that women dominate every non-STEM field. Can't mention that. If a feminist didn't lie by omissi…
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:29 PM
40

It'll be simple, the usual strategy: "He's a man with money, my vag wants man's money. If my vag wants man's money, my vag needs man's money, so give me man's money. Money." It's practically the law, really.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:39 AM
15

What a message to send: The robot doesn't matter as much as the crotches of the team building it. Just bring your kid sister next time. It doesn't matter if she's 3 years old, you can say she's a child robotics prodigy, the robot was actually all her idea because you're a bunch of stupid boys, and you'll get extra points. They love that shit, they lap it up. And if the robot doesn't work? It's the boys' faults for not implementing the toddler's flawless, ahead-of-its-time design.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:47 PM
15

They're correct. That kind of violence is far different and way worse than if it were plain vanilla violence directed against you. What, you think that violence can't be justified when a woman is inflicting it? HAAHAHAAHAAHAA...
/r/MensRights11/03/19 09:57 AM
1

And yet, you wholly believe such a person will refuse to invest capital in a firm while they stand a chance to make a buck.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 03:43 AM
1

In theory, yes. In practice, not as often as you'd imagine. Being a white girl seems to increase one's white privilege. The loud obsession with racism is a good camouflage for what's going on underneath. The white girl's demand is that white men be pushed-out and the jobs be given to "women and POC" in that order, with "women" by default being white. As soon as they are given some tiny little position of authority, they instantly start using it to play favorites.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 09:48 PM
1

I think he's saying that white people are so racist that they will refrain from oppressing Nigerians. In order to gaslight the other POC and keep them confused, perhaps. Whitey is very clever, but also weirdly stupid.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 09:39 PM
1

White men don't mind selling to POC to make money. But they're crazy evil racists! Of course they WOULD mind selling to POC! They'd surely prefer to deny goods to POC! That would maintain white power and help keep POC under the boot heel. If you don't sell food to POC, they starve. Cut off the water and electricity to a POC's house, they can't live. This is what white people do, yes? That's the only thing they do. This is how white supremacy works, surely: oppress people at the expense of moneym…
/r/MensRights10/03/19 09:35 PM
1

Hey, she did talk about that, uh, paper from Hotshot Consulters Company. That's totally good enough. See? grrl pwr.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 09:30 PM
1

If you are a women and want more women at amazon, fucking work there instead of bitching about it. NO. Men need to make it happen! Women are too busy writing articles about how it's sexist to not give them more money.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 09:28 PM
1

Haha, this. This is obviously the overriding concern. "Golly, these evil capitalist fatcats would suuure make a lot more money if they gave $100,000 bonuses to people who look like meeee because that would, uh, help shareholder value. Stupid sexist bigwigs don't know how to corporation. I should totally be in charge."
/r/MensRights10/03/19 09:27 PM
1

and you’re not representing your worker base, So the composition of a company's workforce does not reflect the composition of its workforce. Makes sense.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 09:24 PM
1

Because when the competition comes down to a white woman and a black man, the white woman usually wins. Her vagina doesn't exactly perfectly cancel-out her white privilege, if I am forced to use the terminology.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 09:16 PM
2

And she's the one to help. She really really cares about Amazon's stock price! Instead of being worth $800 billion, with a little bit of Grrl Pwr and some melanin, it could be worth- uh- $800 gazillion-zillion-billion!
/r/MensRights10/03/19 09:15 PM
4

So what you're saying is that if a white man owns a store, he will only sell goods to other white men and ignore other customers? Yes? That's the most likely conclusion from your statement. Because people who lend capital to create new businesses tend to think in a similar way. I'm very curious about this ironclad assumption that a white dude will do absolutely nothing in his life except for discriminating against people and he cannot do anything besides that. Is this a great assumption to make?…
/r/MensRights10/03/19 09:20 AM
41

Redecorating is what she's calling for. Right? Human redecorating. Not "building". Not "founding." Not "creating something new." No, redecorating with humans. Gotta have the right colors and hairstyles and groins or it just isn't right. It's really a very simple thing. You don't need to know anything about anything. You don't need to know how to read a financial statement, how a supply chain works, how a database cross-references customer data, nothing at all. You don't need to know fucking anyt…
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:53 AM
20

Let's be honest: these chicks do not give a shit about improving how a corporation performs. They think corporations are destroying the planet, the shareholders are fatcats and the capitalist system is exploitative. "Oh yes, Bigtime Consulting Inc said that companies with diverse workforces are run better! They return more shareholder value!" Nah, she doesn't give a shit about shareholder value or efficiency, it's an obviously-insincere argument. "This is the male argument!" She thinks "I must m…
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:39 AM
135

For all the advances Amazon has made, it still can’t seem to figure out diversity. I love how a young, hip, fresh out of school, white-as-Antarctica journalist chick can sit in her office, sip her butterscotch ristretto and tell everyone way more successful than herself exactly what their problem is and the only possible solution is her deeply heartfelt wish: a corporation which runs on Social Justice in lieu of goods or services and makes lots and lots of money by employing Brazilians, Bolivian…
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:23 AM
1

Again, google isn't sure why people with less qualifications are starting higher. Huh. Must be evil men and their evil discrimination, then. It's the only possible explanation for everything that goes wrong anywhere. Sears Roebuck (back when they were a company) in the early 80s underwent a very thorough federal government investigation as to why men were coming-away with higher paychecks despite the company trying very hard to pay women fairly. What they discovered is that men tended to take th…
/r/MensRights10/03/19 04:05 AM
1

See? Perfect justice. Just what I meant.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 11:01 PM
9

20% of complainants, said that they did not know why they filed a false allegation "I dunno! I was bored, I guess? I like attention!" ...how do you repair holes in walls? And why does my fist hurt?
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter