TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

foresthill Archive

View 23 posts and 218 comments by foresthill on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
778

foresthill/r/MensRights24/05/12 01:00 PM
493

foresthill/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:39 PM
244

foresthill/r/MensRights28/02/12 02:34 PM
239

foresthill/r/MensRights26/10/11 01:44 PM
171

foresthill/r/MensRights10/11/11 04:10 PM
85

foresthill/r/MensRights17/02/12 04:41 AM
52

foresthill/r/MensRights09/06/12 06:24 AM
41

foresthill/r/MensRights14/12/11 04:32 AM
33

foresthill/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:25 AM
32

foresthill/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:30 PM
28

foresthill/r/MensRights07/08/12 03:52 AM
28

foresthill/r/MensRights08/02/12 12:48 AM
12

foresthill/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:23 PM
12

foresthill/r/MensRights15/05/12 03:25 AM
8

foresthill/r/MensRights23/03/12 05:42 PM
7

foresthill/r/MensRights27/06/11 06:27 PM
5

foresthill/r/MensRights27/06/11 06:08 PM
4

foresthill/r/MensRights13/01/12 08:29 PM
3

foresthill/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:04 PM
3

foresthill/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:23 PM
2

foresthill/r/MensRights10/02/12 12:54 AM
1

foresthill/r/MensRights12/05/12 02:17 AM
1

foresthill/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:04 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Not to mention drunk men.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 12:52 AM
12

You made an error in your instructions. 3. Then select "I Couldn't find the page or information I wanted." Should read: 3. Then select "The results included a page that was irrelevant." The original doesn't bring you to the pop-up you described.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 12:51 AM
1

Cool, thanks.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:37 PM
2

Top post on /r/Askreddit right now: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/xhwt8/i_just_saw_a_woman_accuse_a_man_of_being_a/
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:31 PM
1

What's it like being a father? Major pros, major cons?
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:19 PM
-1

They are both out of earshot/he lost his voice.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 06:01 PM
2

We are both right. It's the same article, but the link address is different. That's why the original didn't show up when I searched before posting.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:41 PM
0

I don't think so. Link to other post?
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:12 PM
2

Devil's advocate: A police officer sees a murder in progress and chases the suspect down an alley. The suspect passes through a cloud of fog in the alley. When the officer reaches the end of the alley he looks left and sees a white man briskly walking away. He looks right and sees a black man briskly walking away. He can only head in one direction. Logically, keeping in mind what you just told us about statistics, which direction should he head in? Edit: Two replies, neither get to the point of …
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:37 PM
22

There was a post a few months ago about a guy who wore a kilt to a party. He said that a lot of girls came up to him and actually lifted it up to peak underneath. Haha, all in good fun, right? Now imagine the genders reversed.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:45 PM
4

In your workplace would the women also be able to put pictures up? The problem is that in my office there is a double standard.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:02 PM
8

Even if this OP is fake, my coworker has a similar setup (if not worse). It's just 1 huge poster of a topless, oiled up, MMA fighter. It totally wouldn't fly in my office if I had a girl in a bikini poster in my office, but somehow she gets a pass.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:39 PM
-1

Contact Information Email: [email protected] Office Phone: 250.721.8353 Lounge Phone: 250.472.4557 Mailing Address: Box 3035, University of Victoria, Lekwungen Territory, Victoria BC, V8W 3P3
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:35 PM
0

I didn't say it wasn't a good response, it's not a response at all. I asked you a question that you didn't answer and you didn't comment on anything discussed. Instead of just claiming that my argument has no substance why don't you actually invalidate it or at least point out which parts you disagree with and why?
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:57 PM
0

That's not even a response.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:15 PM
0

You're right, there is a fine line between encouraging violence/free speech. Fortunately, legal systems all over the world have been discussing what the appropriate judgement call should be in such circumstances. Their conclusions have been compiled into what is called "the law". I believe what most people here are arguing is simply that "the law" should be used as reddit's deciding line as well.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:11 PM
-1

A private, free site is not censoring your free speech just b/c it doesn't want to host your bullshit. I didn't say it was. What part of: I'm not saying that your legal freedom as a citizen is infringed did you not understand? I merely think that the freedom within the site is decreased. If Nintendo changed Super Mario Bros. so that the character Mario could no longer jump, that would be a restriction of the players freedom in the vertical direction. It's not an infringement on their legal right…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:30 PM
1

No, that's just them asking to change their ads. In this incidence they are not asking them to change ads, they are asking them to change what users can do on a website where people are currently able to post whatever they want (within the law). When I type this comment to you, I am working within the freedom that reddit currently provides. If somebody petitions reddit to not allow the use of certain words, phrases, etc. (within the law) on the website, they would be petitioning for the reductio…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:21 PM
7

How is it anti-freedom for a private person (or group of people) to petition a company to change its practices? Because what they are petitioning for is the restriction of freedom.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:36 AM
22

"Girls, don't put make-up on while driving or the Sheriff might have to pound your ass back at the station!" - This message paid for by U.S. tax dollars. To be fair, putting make-up on while driving isn't cool, right?
/r/MensRights05/07/12 12:33 AM
2

Not to mention in Canada I pay more for car insurance for the simple fact that I'm a man. Either allow insurance companies to include gender in quotes, or don't. It seems the current situation is that companies can only include gender in insurance quotes if it results in a better outcome for women.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 03:44 AM
18

TROLL ALERT
/r/MensRights30/06/12 03:33 AM
4

I meant funny as in highly absurd, not funny as in "HaHa."
/r/MensRights26/06/12 11:15 PM
30

"Therefore, the big question is: are these baby boxes upholding women's rights, and has the mother of that child consented to the baby being placed in the baby box?" Funny how they don't ask "has the father of that child consented to the baby being placed in the baby box?" when it's mothers leaving them.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 01:45 PM
11

Yeah, anything less than $150,000,000.00 would be a dick move.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 04:51 PM
9

"77 cents on the dollar for doing the same work". Are you fucking kidding me?? How can they blatantly lie like that?
/r/MensRights22/06/12 12:32 AM
1

"The present study confirms what earlier studies have shown: that the death penalty is imposed on women relatively infrequently and that it is disproportionately imposed for the killing of women. Thus, the death penalty in California appears to be applied in accordance with stereotypes about women’s innate abilities, their roles in society, and their capacity for violence. Far from being gender neutral, the California death penalty seems to allow prejudices and stereotypes about violence and gen…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 02:09 PM
7

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parental_child_abduction
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:59 AM
43

He's making a mockery of how women are treated, not how they actually are.
/r/MensRights10/06/12 08:15 PM
8

Second top commenter is a woman!
/r/MensRights09/06/12 07:06 PM
1

Contact them here.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 06:19 PM
7

Another gem from their website: http://i.imgur.com/ygy5j.png This is not a women's health store. This is Canada's largest drug store.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 06:52 AM
2

Holy shit, get this comment to the top!
/r/MensRights09/06/12 05:08 AM
4

Canada. We're 6.5% of Reddit!
/r/MensRights09/06/12 04:54 AM
3

Should they make as many female-fitted jerseys as they do male ones for the sake of equality? The difference is that, as a man, I can still buy the female-fitted jersey. But, as a man, I can't get free drinks at that bar. By all means, sell make-up products that are designed for different skin colours. But don't have "whites only" restaurants. There's a difference between designing a product intended for a specific demographic and outright restricting products for specific demographics. Overall …
/r/MensRights09/06/12 12:01 AM
1

Newspeak
/r/MensRights07/06/12 12:24 AM
17

Some statistics with sources: US workplace fatalities: 92% male vs. 8% female. US prison population: 93.5% male vs. 6.5% female. US homeless population: 74% male vs. 26% female. US Iraq war fatalities: 97.7% male vs. 2.3% female. US homicide victims: 75% male vs. 25% female. The explicitly sexist Combat Exclusion Policy of the US Military. The explicitly sexist Conscription Policy of the US Military.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 08:40 PM
5

Go fuck yourself you piece of shit.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 05:51 PM
8

Because the men's rights movement is treated as a hate group unworthy of serious consideration.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 05:48 PM
5

Troll.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 05:46 PM
23

Religious institutions cut off part of penis with no anesthetic or consent = Perfectly acceptable. Religious institutions refuse to fund birth control = WAR AGAINST WOMEN!!! What world do we live in???
/r/MensRights06/06/12 02:18 AM
2

people who evaluate these things understand the idea of controlling for other variables. Then why do they continually highlight the 77 cent ratio, which doesn't control for other variables?
/r/MensRights05/06/12 10:37 PM
42

Revised version.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:16 PM
39

They said it's unfair without even saying what the reasons for it are! Today in the NBA, there are 4 black people for every 1 white person. Where is the Obama pamphlet declaring how "unfair" this is? (sarcasm)
/r/MensRights04/06/12 06:00 PM
2

It's evidence of the fact that some women in Amsterdam promote the idea that there's an increased problem with sexual slavery when prostitution is legalised. The truth of their statements and their motivations have yet to be determined. FTFY
/r/MensRights01/06/12 09:31 PM
6

Workers in Amsterdam recently staged a demonstration to point out the huge sexual slavery problem. A demonstration is not evidence of anything. If you want to be taken seriously you need to actually present some kind of supporting argument, not just the fact that some people made a demonstration. The idea that legalising prostitution somehow increases the number of sex slaves has yet to be shown. Certainly forced prostitution occurs in legal brothels, but that is not a result of their legalisati…
/r/MensRights01/06/12 09:20 PM
9

Yes, if by valid you mean stupid.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 07:06 PM
7

...listen, I think this is a stupid concept. Making prostitution illegal puts the entire industry into the hands of underground criminal organizations and completely isolates it from any regulation and inspection (i.e. the ideal conditions for forced labour).
/r/MensRights01/06/12 06:26 PM
2

If you watch the uncut video it looks a lot more reasonable. The woman in black was clearly resisting arrest and then the woman in pink comes in and tries to physically stop the cop from arresting the woman in black.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:02 PM
0

The problem is is that you aren't showing problems that ARE similar. Similar in that they are both legitimate problems. I wasn't going to try and make exact mirrors, I just wanted to show that both sides have problems. And then you make two statements at the end that came from where? The "man the fuck up" is usually said from other guys in my experience. This is from my own experience. Yeah, a lot of the times it is men saying "man the fuck up" but it doesn't matter that they are men. The proble…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:00 PM
2

If she dies before she pays it off I believe you take on the debt. This was a concern for a couple I know. They were thinking about marriage but then decided against it when the man (with debt) got cancer. The debt can go nowhere (if unmarried), or it can go to her (if married). No brainier.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 03:08 AM
3

I wasn't trying to show that one gender has it worse than the other. I was trying to show that the problems are similar but the support in society for solving each is different. Men's rights issues are often ignored if not outright denounced.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 02:40 AM
6

Individually, yeah, do whatever you've got to do to get through your problems. But, social movements can actually cause change. My image represents the message of the MRM, not just individual guys complaining.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 02:31 AM
1

Do you understand the difference between something having good factors, and something being recommended? Ex. Cutting off your legs has shown to statistically reduce sprained ankles. Does this mean it is recommended?
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:36 AM
1

It's only recommended in an HIV epidemic. That is not what we're talking about.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 10:09 PM
0

True.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:58 PM
-1

Nice.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:31 PM
1

I wasn't trying to make a comparison between each point. Some of them just happened to turn out that way. The government not banning something that should be banned (harm by omission) is similarly wrong to the government doing something that it should not (harm by commission).
/r/MensRights24/05/12 06:48 PM
2

Hold it right there. "WHO/UNAIDS recommendations emphasize that male circumcision should be considered an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence." Do you think that describes the people we're talking about? We're talking about developed countries without epidemics.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 06:43 PM
6

it is used to treat health issues. Please cite one health organization which recommends using circumcision to treat a health issue. But I also understand the religious background of it and understand why it happens. Is it the Government's role to put an end to this? I don't think so. The fact that it has a religious background somehow makes it immune from the law? I guess we should have female circumcision, stoning of adulterers, and we should execute gay people. Totally outside of the governmen…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:58 PM
8

there's also evidence to suggest that it has many health benefits Cutting off your legs decreases your chance of getting a sprained ankle. Shall I grab my saw? The fact that it has some benefits does not mean it's right. It's not even recommended as a medical procedure. Don't you think it's a little strange that you would be charged with child abuse if you cut off any other part of your newborn baby's body, but somehow this highly sensitive, functional part of his penis is totally up for the sli…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:25 PM
8

Circumcision should be outlawed by the government. Just like cutting off any other part of your newborn son.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:09 PM
3

My parents told me that they circumcised me because "everybody else was doing it." Societal pressure is a huge factor in everybody's decisions, including parents.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:07 PM
0

Are you circumcised? The link that you posted says that the data is not sufficient to recommend it. Just because there are benefits doesn't mean it's right. Example: If you cut your legs off there is a reduced risk of sprained ankles. Shall I get my hacksaw?
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:06 PM
4

Selling drugs, robbery, extortion, fraud, etc. Crime where money is involved.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 04:56 PM
6

I think the main argument is that women who do the same amount of work don't get paid the same wages for the same job. That would be an argument...if it were true. It's not. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwogDPh-Sow
/r/MensRights24/05/12 04:38 PM
2

like it or not, men tend to commit more violent and sexual crimes. Like it or not, women don't do an equal amount of work and therefore don't get paid the same. When I've brought this up with feminists they claim that society should put programs in place to specially encourage/propel women into higher paying roles to make the totals equal. I.e. Affirmative action. I don't see the same ideas brought forward for specially reducing the causes that lead men to jail and homelessness. I think the idea…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:50 PM
136

Okay, okay. Revision 2: http://i.imgur.com/WGqnE.jpg
/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:41 PM
29

Yeah, but it's still a problem even if it is their own gender. Gender rights aren't about 1 gender vs. another gender. It's about 1 gender vs. society's treatment of them.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:53 PM
11

I wasn't trying to show that one gender has the more difficult lot. I was trying to show that the problems are similar but the support for solving each is different.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:43 PM
0

Yeah, sorry. It was just something I whipped up in 10 minutes, there's a ton of ways it could be improved.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:27 PM
108

Good point. Edit: I've made a revised version based on your comment: http://i.imgur.com/p2v9J.jpg
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:06 PM
97

Sources: US workplace fatalities: 92% male vs. 8% female. US prison population: 93.5% male vs. 6.5% female. US homeless population: 74% male vs. 26% female. US Iraq war fatalities: 97.7% male vs. 2.3% female. US homicide victims: 75% male vs. 25% female.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 01:52 PM
2

Men's magazines (GQ, Men's Health, etc.) are full of photo-shopped, good looking, ripped guys. Women complain that they have to meet unattainable standards set by the media and people like you think it doesn't happen to men as well. It's so ingrained in your psyche that you can't see it when it's right in your face. 41 million people saw this ad on Youtube alone and it became a media sensation. Did you stop for a second and think about how god damn much this advertisement tells men that their bo…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 12:31 AM
1

Chanel advert win I'd love to see the reaction to this being posted on /r/funny. So hilarious, right? /s
/r/MensRights24/05/12 12:30 AM
20

That's impossible, there's no such thing as sexism against men!
/r/MensRights22/05/12 02:31 AM
1

I actually knew both of those things and you clearly missed the point of me linking them and my comm. I'm making fun of them back. Their satire and hate of advice is shown to be idiotic when you use it in the context of pickpockets. Nobody thinks tips for avoiding pickpockets are stupid/useless and nobody thinks they should instead be targeted towards pickpockets themselves.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 04:44 AM
2

So basically anything that is about the subreddit itself cannot be presented to the subreddit itself. Sounds like a good system!
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:47 PM
7

no one's castrating their sons. People do this to their own daughters. FGM is not castration. And these "procedures" aren't in some nice sterilized doctors office. That is a result of the illegality.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 04:01 PM
2

There's only 158 subscribers there...
/r/MensRights19/05/12 03:33 PM
2

Have you ever heard of affirmative action? Have you ever heard of gender quotas?
/r/MensRights19/05/12 03:30 PM
2

Invite lurkers to participate and subscribe.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:10 AM
2

Create memes that promote the MRM or highlight MR issues.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:06 AM
2

Submit Men's Rights related posts to other subsreddits.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:05 AM
0

Do nothing.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:04 AM
1

Im gonna guess that women get verbally harassed more in the street. That's one that I've heard a lot of complaining about and it seems legit. Though that hardly adds up to the ultra-victim status that they claim.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:57 AM
2

The problem is that the distinction is not always made. Affirmative action policies are often defended by calls to "equality."
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:54 AM
8

Top tips to end pickpocketing: Don't put your hands in other peoples' pockets. When you see money in somebody's pocket, don't touch it. If somebody asks you for directions, don't steal what's in their pockets. http://www.ebony.com/news-views/stop-telling-women-how-to-not-get-raped http://www.happyplace.com/11433/poster-explains-how-to-not-rape
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:41 AM
19

This was the top post in /r/twoxchromosomes just last week. The title was something like "so true."
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:03 AM
2

What's the problem with it though? It doesn't accuse all black people of being robbers.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 08:32 PM
2

"Don't tell us not to go to the ghetto. Tell black people not to rob us!" Do you have the same comment for this sign?
/r/MensRights10/05/12 08:22 PM
1

The OP implied that you are at risk of home invasion if you are known to be unarmed: "all a home invader has to do...to find out who is armed."
/r/MensRights09/05/12 12:53 AM
1

OP implied that being unarmed makes you more likely to have your home invaded. I refuted that by saying that Canadians don't have higher rates of home invasion, even though they are unarmed. (Ergo, being armed or not has nothing to with level of home invasions.) You said that being armed or not has nothing to with level of home invasions. Ergo, you and I have the same point.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 12:19 AM
1

That is exactly my point.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 08:55 PM
2

That is exactly my point.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 08:55 PM
3

The entire country of Canada is unarmed. Surprisingly, very few home invasions.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 03:20 PM
-1

How do you feel about citizens with nuclear weapons?
/r/MensRights26/03/12 03:23 PM
4

Is it so hard to say "I help weak people more"? The problem with generalizing based on gender, aside from it being unnecessary, is that it establishes a status quo which is easily abused. If a woman wants something moved at my office the status quo is "call a guy." Surely this is necessary some of the time, but all too often the women are just passing off their work onto the men because they can. Once a week I get called to bring a roll of paper downstairs for a girl who is perfectly able to do …
/r/MensRights25/03/12 06:59 PM
12

This just in from the guy you didn't help because of his gender: "Fuck you."
/r/MensRights25/03/12 03:54 PM
4

Exactly. It is disparate treatment to base car insurance rates on gender.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 08:44 PM
5

If statistics show that black people steal from their employers more often, am I justified in not hiring a black person on the basis that they are black?
/r/MensRights21/03/12 03:12 PM
-3

The text at the bottom says "Don't be THAT guy." A better way to imagine it would be to think about a sign against theft that said "Don't be THAT black person." That would clearly be racism. This is clearly sexism.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 01:13 AM
28

"White girl killed friend then claimed it was a tall black male who did it." You bet your ass that post would be on a Black Rights subreddit.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 09:09 PM
31

That is just fucking bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 04:46 PM
1

It's not a matter of which check is used to pay for which items. It's a matter of if the amount that is spent on the child is equal to the child support payments. If the amount that is spent on the child is less than the child support payments then there will be extra money for this girl to buy Coach shoes. This seems to be what happened here. It wasn't like she was saying "Oh, here's the child support payment, now I can go buy those shoes I was meaning to buy before." It seemed more like she wa…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:20 PM
0

Honestly I can't tell what this women is doing legally wrong? Can also be interpreted as Honestly it doesn't seem like this woman has done something legally wrong. in this context. That statement would clearly attract downvotes from people who believe she did do something legally wrong. I wouldn't have said anything, but he was complaining about the downvotes on the basis of his innocent 'question' while ignoring the implication he made with his statement (i.e. it doesn't look like she's done so…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:12 PM
2

Okay. The illegal thing is spending child support payments on personal items. Cleared up? This image doesn't prove that, but it's grounds for further investigation.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:49 PM
2

I CANNOT believe I am getting downvoted for asking a question. You got downvoted for a statement. Then you tried to complain by saying you merely asked a question. You didn't. Me pointing that out is not pedantic. Edit: typo
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:29 PM
0

It doesn't explicitly prove anything, but it is a sign that there should be further investigation. If you see somebody smash the glass of a car (not a crime), you damn sure better call the cops. It could turn out the guy was smashing his own glass, but you wouldn't have been wrong to inform the police.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:05 PM
-1

Honestly I can't tell what this women is doing legally wrong? Putting a question mark on a statement doesn't make it a question.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 05:02 PM
4

Yes. So? Misandric adverts aren't bad because they are bad for the actor. CPearson is claiming that porn is bad because it is bad for the actors.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:39 PM
3

Breakdowns happen at all jobs.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:31 PM
5

Last time I checked porn actors aren't slaves. If you ban porn actors from doing something that they want to do, isn't that degrading? "You can't do the thing you want to do, you're too stupid to pick what's right!"
/r/MensRights16/03/12 02:07 PM
15

Imagine this: Brenda makes $3,000 a month on her own. A judge decides that the parents should spend $1,000 per month, combined, on the child. Therefore, the husband must give $500 per month for his share of the child support. Brenda would have $2,500 ($3,000 - $500) of disposable income for herself. Brenda skimps on the child and ends up only spending $500 on the child that month. Brenda now has $3,000 of disposable income for herself, meaning that she has essentially stolen $500 from her child …
/r/MensRights16/03/12 01:59 PM
1

"You don't think I understand how insurance works?" Nope. Hence my explanation. "Where did I indicate that I didn't understand that insurance is based on statistics?" I didn't see an answer to this question in your explanation. If you say the people who avoid accidents getting "fucked" by having to pay for others, then you are implicitly challenging the concept of insurance, whether you realized it or not. No, this is not what I'm saying is getting "fucked." What is getting "fucked" is when you …
/r/MensRights16/03/12 01:29 PM
2

Yes, and you missed the title of the post. All the other fields were filled out the same.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 01:04 PM
2

You don't think I understand how insurance works? Where did I indicate that I didn't understand that insurance is based on statistics? Did you ignore my entire comment? Did you not see where I said "you may statistically be right", or do you just like to try to discredit the person you're responding to before you make your argument? to say that insurance companies cannot group policy holders is to say they have to charge everyone the same price When did I say that everybody should be charged the…
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:52 AM
6

Explain why it's not okay to discriminate based on race when statistically supported, but it is okay to discriminate based on gender when statistically supported.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:04 PM
5

have long been able This means nothing. Though to be honest it sort of makes sense to charge girls less. They do drive a whole lot safer. Age also makes a lot of difference when you look at the numbers. Though to be honest it sort of makes sense to not hire black people as cashiers. They do steal from their employers a whole lot more. It makes a difference when you look at the numbers.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:03 PM
14

So because it is good for business, it should be legal? If it could statistically be shown that more men rape children than women, would a school be justified in not hiring you based on being a man? If it could statistically be shown that black people are more likely to steal from their employers, would an employer be justified in not hiring a person as a cashier, based on him being black? I thought Martin Luther King Jr. cleared up that issue once and for all. Don't judge people by the groups t…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:39 AM
7

The point is that the prices are different, not that the prices are high.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 02:36 AM
3

She does say that, as do the other women. It's a well known thing, and the status quo is that it's the women's only chocolate in the office. It's there every week and lasts about a day or two. My office is right outside the reception so it's hard to ignore.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 02:55 AM
1

The receptionist says "those are only for the women" with a stern look. I've taken them before, but it's usually not worth it to make a scene.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 02:54 AM
6

Oh yea, that's a good way to simplify what I'm saying to the point that it's not even recognizable. My question was about the receptionist and if she would be in the wrong by saying "these are only for the women" once he's not even there anymore. Obviously the guy didn't buy me chocolate, and I'm not complaining about that at all. I'm talking about once the chocolates are in the office, how should the office deal with them? Not a single person has even attempted to answer my question. Edit: To g…
/r/MensRights13/03/12 01:01 AM
4

I'm not saying it's traumatizing, it's just shitty. I would forget about it but the guy comes in like once a week and then there's a box of chocolates at the front desk for the rest of the day...but I can't have any because I have a penis. Feels like a whites only water fountain.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:07 PM
14

This is a caricature of Brad Pitt. This is Brad Pitt. It would be a fallacy to point at the caricature and then make fun of the real Brad for having a ludicrously pointy jaw. After all, his real jaw looks good. However, the point of the caricature is merely to draw attention to the particular attribute of the subject. The viewer can make a judgement on how they feel about the subject once it has been brought to their attention. This cartoon merely brings the issue to attention, it doesn't full o…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 07:18 PM
6

Imagine two books titled: White People Acting Stupid Black People Are Stupid See the difference now?
/r/MensRights07/03/12 04:51 AM
1

It was on company property. It wouldn't be appropriate to say to the black people at the company "We're having a whites only party upstairs, after work. You're not invited because you're black." Maybe you should have joined the conversation when it was active, rather than bring it up months later because you made an incorrect RES tag and now want to argue the validity of the entire post. Regardless, go eat your own shit from a bowl made out of your mothers chest cavity and with a spoon made out …
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:03 AM
4

This is the god damn fucking email. Go fuck yourself, you stupid fucking fuck.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 01:14 AM
4

Sounds like you're useless at information gathering. privately went out together for shopping or whatever They had a party inside the office. didn't invite the boys They sent the boys an email to tell them that they were not allowed to go to the party inside the office because of their gender. I am the only guy in my position at the company (imagine a male nurse), so it resulted in everybody else in my position having a party while I was excluded because of my gender. Do you have any idea how mu…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 02:03 PM
2

How does PZ Myers give skeptics a bad name?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 11:37 PM
5

This feminist took it literally, as did the feminist who showed me the cartoon. The artist may have meant it satirically, but this view is held by at least some feminists.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:03 PM
0

This feminist took it literally.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:45 PM
5

No, it was a reddit comment, but that's a good example of a feminist using it in a serious context. Good find.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:46 PM
1

Here
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:05 PM
2

I'm not saying the article is right. I'm merely showing that tidux's comment is a bit out of context and doesn't show the author's reasons for their statement. It's easy to paint somebody with the appearance of an ulterior motive when you omit their stated reasoning. Example: gasoline car company: "I realize that oil is a finite resource and we will eventually convert to sustainable forms. But for the time being gasoline cars are still economically viable for most consumers and so this year we w…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:00 PM
1

Ok... Woman lies about birth control, a new human is created, man pays a shit ton of money. Man lies about birth control, nothing happens. HUGE FUCKING DIFFERENCE. Better?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 05:34 PM
16

I don't have the link anymore, but a feminist included this in her comment. She was using it in a serious way.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 04:19 PM
43

This frame says "Boys don't cry." They must not realize how that is actually sexist against boys.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 03:53 PM
10

You excluded the previous line: three in 10 young men ages 25 to 34 had stopped looking for work before the recession hit.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 03:41 PM
0

Not sure, saw it in a comment in /r/feminism.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 03:38 PM
1

Woman lies about birth control, a new human is created. Man lies about birth control, nothing happens. HUGE FUCKING DIFFERENCE.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 03:31 PM
3

I think it's a good post, as satire. It highlights that we shouldn't start dividing up who can comment on moral issues based on which group they're in. You either have a moral argument or you don't, your gender is irrelevant. Should Western countries stop giving aid to Africa because they aren't African and should have no comment on Africa?
/r/MensRights27/02/12 10:29 PM
3

I think it's just a play on another post which said something like "No men have any right to be involved with issues such as abortion and female contraceptives because they only affect women." This is just a push back on that idea.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 10:14 PM
17

Don't apologize so fast, the Wikipedia article says that both spellings are correct.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:41 PM
8

problems of both genders Some people argue that there are no male problems, or they aren't nearly as important as female problems and so they should be ignored.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 11:27 PM
2

What place? Canada? Canada is one of the safest countries in the world.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 10:06 PM
2

It's still sexism against men, even if it's deployed by men. Would it be okay for a black advertiser to consistently make black people look moronic compared to white people in advertising directed at white people? No, that would not be acceptable.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 08:22 PM
8

In those commercials women are portrayed as sexy, not as moronic.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 03:36 PM
4

Yesterday a front page post on TwoX was about a girl who got her ass touched by a guy in a club. The top voted comment was that she, and all girls in similar situations, should kick the man in his balls, twice.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 04:51 AM
9

When has a minor been charged with raping their teacher for having consensual (albeit under-age) sex? I'm all for the men's rights movement, but we don't need to make stuff up.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:29 PM
2

There was an ad for a small time hair salon that depicted a woman who had a black eye and a man giving her a necklace, implying that she had been beaten and he was trying to make it up to her. A feminist blogger wrote an article about it and even set up a fund directing money to a women's shelter and the YWCA. I emailed her asking if she was going to write an article about the superbowl ad, since it had a more blatant case of domestic violence (actually showing the act itself) and it was viewed …
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:33 PM
1

I didn't claim that McDonald's does that, I was giving a hypothetical situation which would be morally wrong.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:46 PM
3

According to the arrest records for 2009, 55% of people arrested for robbery were black. Black people constitute less than 13% of the US population.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 10:05 PM
2

Well I don't think that is actually a fact though, but you're welcome to try and find out if it is.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 08:43 PM
4

Does that actually matter though? If studies show that a particular racial group is statistically more likely to steal, would it be okay if McDonald's put on their website that their official policy is to not hire people of that racial group as cashiers? Anti-discrimination is not about proving that groups are actually the same. It's about freeing the individual from the generalization of the group (even if true) and giving each person a chance to be themselves.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 08:36 PM
5

The original post which brought this to our attention. Big Brothers/Big Sisters FAQ.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:24 PM
3

Very interesting analysis.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 02:12 PM
18

Sorry if that was confusing, I meant that's it's a perfect example of a double standard. People usually feel that a woman is justified doing the slapping, but they would never side with the guy in the video. Personally I think people should slap less in general, but in the cases where slapping is appropriate it should be gender blind.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:24 AM
2

The release was about the Gender Indicators publication that was released today. The publication documents all different areas of gender statistics. The official release of this publication only mentions the part about underemployment, which shows that women are more underemployed than men. Why did they chose this part, and this part only, to discuss when releasing the whole publication?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:03 AM
9

Gotta love the part at 1:20 where the girl touches the guy's ass and the guy slaps her and calls her an asshole.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 12:49 AM
5

How is this a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 12:05 AM
8

Actually, if you read the article it says the girls were cut because the team is moving to a new league which doesn't allow girls. He didn't cut the brother because he is actually allowed to play in the new league.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:30 AM
1

You could elaborate on why you feel that way. You know, reasoning.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:22 AM
4

Yea, I was kind of expecting you to elaborate on why "fuck dat shit".
/r/MensRights30/01/12 11:46 PM
1

Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights30/01/12 11:40 PM
42

Upvote this post to get this addressed by some women.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 11:37 PM
8

The point is a public figure should be more careful with their choice of words, considering people do kill their spouses for cheating.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 11:16 PM
10

No, it is, just only when it's a female victim.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 08:20 PM
10

This article actually portrays her as the victim. They say that the fallout has lead to abuse on her and they make no mention of her threat of falsely accusing the man.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 02:19 PM
58

What you don't understand is that she has been falsely accused many times by men in the past. When you put her actions in context she is actually the victim in this case. Edit: Sarcasm, people. Sarcasm.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 10:03 PM
1

I'm still waiting on your response to this. I feel like you missed the point of my post and your arguments don't address what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 09:01 PM
2

It was actually said by a man.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 07:59 PM
3

War movies show more men dying because more men fight in wars. The murder mystery features a misogynist killer. That doesn't make the movie itself misogynistic. The longest yard shows more men attacked because it's a men's football team. What excuse is there to justify the gender ratio in this case?
/r/MensRights14/01/12 01:21 AM
1

Nononono... you don't understand sexism. It's not wrong for a police officer to pull over a black person. It is wrong for a police officer to be pulling over black people 94% of the time. This would be evidence of discrimination since black people are not responsible for 94% of traffic offences. In those commercials a man is attacked 94% of the time. Is this because men are more deserving of office discipline? Is this because men are more acceptable targets for violence? You'll notice all of the…
/r/MensRights13/01/12 11:59 PM
0

Links to all 5 episodes.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 08:30 PM
-3

http://i.imgur.com/j849z.jpg "And while our cerebral cortexes know that childbirth should be a "choice" "agreed upon" by both partners, somewhere deep in our mammalian nether-regions (especially the female ones), there is a drive to create life. That drive can be chaotic, unspoken, even not entirely conscious—and it certainly isn't always up to Aristotelian standards of discourse. But guess what? Without it, Aristotle wouldn't have existed, and neither would any of us." http://www.7x7.com/love-s…
/r/MensRights28/11/11 06:45 PM
1

So, in Germany, would it be okay if you sent an email to all of your Jewish co-workers explicitly telling them that they are not invited to your own private party because they are Jewish? Nobody is saying that people can't organize these parties in their spare time, you're allowed to be sexist/racist/homophobic in your private life. We're saying you shouldn't broadcast your personal discriminatory feelings to those who you are discriminating against. I'm not saying anything here is illegal, I'm …
/r/MensRights11/11/11 04:10 PM
2

The prior at least implies racism while the latter doesn't necessarily imply sexism. Why? Because you said so? Free association must mean absolute free association. Nobody's saying to ban sexism. Nobody's saying to ban racism. People are saying it's not socially acceptable to tell your coworkers that you are racist/sexist against them.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 03:04 AM
2

Ok, so you admit this would be totally cool if they said "we're having a whites only night"?
/r/MensRights11/11/11 02:48 AM
3

Thank you. You've explained my exact reasoning for this post. As I stated elsewhere, you may find it interesting that I am the only male in my role at the company. This means that all of the people in my role will be going out together, except me because of my penis. If a guys night out were held it would be with men in other roles at the company who I don't relate with as much.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 02:40 AM
3

I'm the only guy in my position at the company, the other men are in different roles. That means that I spend most of my time interacting with, and relating to, the women who have the same role as I do. So basically all of the people that I work with are going out together except for me because of my penis.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 02:31 AM
3

So you've never put something out there on Reddit for all to see wink wink that was a condemnation of something that somebody said?
/r/MensRights11/11/11 12:05 AM
1

A company event, meaning it pertains to the people in the company, not that it's formulated by management.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 10:40 PM
9

It's not sponsored by management but it's within the company. The only people that email was sent to was all the men of the company. No girls were even on it. It was just a "you can't come" email. If it had nothing to do with the company that email never would have been sent. I'm not saying the company is sexist, I'm saying that woman is.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 10:15 PM
6

Maybe I don't want black people along at all of my gatherings. Maybe I'm a little racist. But that doesn't mean I should announce to the black people at my office that they are not invited to my whites only party. These women are a little sexist. Fine, maybe we all are. But that shouldn't be broadcast across the company emails reminding us of how we stereotype against eachother. Maybe I like fashion and Sex and the City, but I'm not even allowed into the discussion because my gender stereotypes …
/r/MensRights10/11/11 10:06 PM
2

Kind of like when you make a post about not liking something that somebody said? Kind of like that? Are you familiar with that kind of thing? Do you know what I'm saying? Am I getting through to you? Edit: spelling
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:59 PM
14

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_Santa
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:31 PM
1

Sexism is not hatred of the other sex or a removal of their rights. It is: attitudes or behavior based on traditional stereotypes of sexual roles. The role of the women is to share gifts and build relationships while the role of the guys is to go fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:26 PM
8

So telling people that the only reason they weren't invited to an event is that they have a penis between their legs is not sexism?
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:01 PM
49

I just feel that if we had a guys only company event there would be an uproar.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 04:50 PM
0

She was talking about her upcoming wedding. :'(
/r/MensRights01/11/11 03:31 PM
9

On CBC radio they had a female film critic who said "I didn't know if I'd like to see this movie since Ryan Gosling doesn't show his abs." This was said on the air as if it was professional commentary, with a small chuckle from the male host. Imagine the roles were reversed with a male reviewer: "I didn't know if I'd like to see this movie since Natalie Portman doesn't show her body." How would a female host react? Would that air on CBC radio? Edit: Karen Gordon: ...narrated by Ryan Reynolds, it…
/r/MensRights01/11/11 03:02 PM
1

It's a slip up on the part of the film creators, not a theme of their movie. As I said in another post, had they said " you would hit a white person!?" even if the film had nothing to do with racism that would be totally wrong and worth pointing out. We're just not at the level where we see this as that wrong, even though it is. As for what we are supposed to do with this information, I believe the answer is: get mad. This in particular isn't going to start a revolution on its own. But, it will …
/r/MensRights29/10/11 11:55 AM
1

Anti-sexism...it's kind of the point of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 05:52 AM
2

In the 2nd last sentence of the trailer they propagate the sexist idea that 1 sex in particular should be protected from violence.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:04 PM
2

I believe the onus is on you to prove that assumption wrong.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:27 PM
5

http://i.imgur.com/6I8J9.png
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:34 PM
4

The desire is the disorder, not the inclination to act on it. Where is the evidence to show that the inclination to act on it is any different?
/r/MensRights27/10/11 07:49 PM
5

What evidence suggests that there are many more people who fancy the idea of having all the money in a bank who absolutely DO NOT rob banks, and never would? This despite the extremely powerful greedy urges they feel, and their ability to excuse their potential robberies.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:10 PM
8

This event is from Canada, but our societies definitely overlap.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 04:36 PM
36

It says she thought he was reaching for a gun, not that there was actually a gun present. The daughter who was in the car during the incident had this to say: “My mom, I don’t know why she was carrying a knife,” the girl said; “she pulled it out and – this is the truth — she, she stabbed my daddy right here,” she said, slapping the side of her neck. “And blood came out.” “I love him with all my heart and my mom, too, but I wonder why she did that.” Do you think that if it was an actual violent s…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 04:20 PM
0

Can I cut off my son's finger tips?
/r/MensRights04/10/11 04:37 PM
1

LOL. Sorry, that made me laugh. You think prices in the U.S. are actually cheaper than in most places? BAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Look here from this article. Every country below 100% has less expensive prices than the U.S.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 08:01 PM
0

Bob: You should play the lottery, most people win! Tom: Really? 50% of people win? Bob: I didn't really mean 50% literally. Tom: The truth is the vast majority of people lose the lottery. Your argument is invalid, I should not play the loterry. Testicle: YOUR ARGUMENT WAS BASED ON A FLAW IN HIS TYPING. LOL
/r/MensRights21/08/11 03:12 PM
1

Yet another lie of a fact from SweetKage.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 05:23 AM
1

And now we come full circle. My original comment was to SweetKage, the guy who doesn't want to work as hard as everybody else. Your Poverty in the USA article defined poverty as lacking a "socially acceptable amount of money."
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:52 AM
1

You made a conclusion based on a false premise. The truth is that the vast majority of Americans are employed. Your argument is invalid.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 12:03 AM
0

Seriously? You think that logically follows from what I said?
/r/MensRights20/08/11 11:19 PM
0

Not free, but a lot cheaper. Prices would have to go down or else nothing would get sold. Prices are tied to how much money people have to spend.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 09:41 PM
-1

most of us are out of work. Really, US unemployment hit 50%? I refuse to argue with somebody who has no inclination to factual authenticity.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 09:38 PM
2

But it's American society that drives those prices up. When everybody works hard and makes a lot of money, the price of things increases.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 07:54 PM
2

I don't see what this has to do with men's rights. Seems more like a human rights/poverty issue.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 02:59 PM
1

Exactly the point of my post. I'm not trying to point out the lack of justification for the slap itself, I'm talking about the double standard. Imagine 3 guys slapping a girl, for any reason, on TV.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 12:35 PM
2

Imagine the roles reversed...
/r/MensRights27/06/11 06:09 PM
1

When I was picking out a card at the store today a considerable percentage of them were a bit unappreciative of fathers. One said "Do you know why Father's Day is in June? Because about a month after Mother's Day somebody thought 'Wait a minute...'" Another said "Dear Dad, I'll always remember the things you tell me. Of course I'll never listen to them, agree with them, or do them...but I'll remember them."
/r/MensRights19/06/11 11:01 PM
10

"...due to social double standards, reports are rarely taken seriously, if made at all." The data is unattainable. Then there is female on female rape. Then there are teachers who take advantage of children who cannot legally consent. It doesn't really matter what the stats are, just that these things do happen.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 05:17 PM
9

You are only to blame when you break a rule. If you do something risky, but you are within your own personal freedoms, you're not to blame. If you go hiking in deer country, that's totally cool! If a hunter shoots you while you're out there, it's not your fault, but you could have lowered your risk by not partaking in that activity. Nobody is going to come out and say 'He never should have been hiking! It's his fault because he was hiking!' Everybody has the right to hike. Everybody has the righ…
/r/MensRights10/06/11 03:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter