TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

genkernels Archive

View 19 posts and 2,413 comments by genkernels on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
119

progressgenkernels/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/22 12:58 AM
108

Progressgenkernels/r/MensRights29/09/25 05:17 PM
82

Marriage/Childrengenkernels/r/MensRights28/11/17 07:35 AM
71

articlegenkernels/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/24 12:52 AM
71

progressgenkernels/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 02:28 AM
64

Social Issuesgenkernels/r/MensRights20/01/19 11:34 PM
45

Generalgenkernels/r/MensRights15/11/17 03:04 AM
40

False Accusationgenkernels/r/MensRights09/09/25 06:46 AM
34

False Accusationgenkernels/r/MensRights16/07/19 11:13 PM
26

misandrygenkernels/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/21 09:42 PM
25

genkernels/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/20 08:28 PM
25

Social Issuesgenkernels/r/MensRights06/10/19 09:10 AM
14

Edu./Occu.genkernels/r/MensRights17/01/20 10:28 PM
14

Edu./Occu.genkernels/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:52 PM
12

Feminismgenkernels/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:50 AM
12

Legal Rightsgenkernels/r/MensRights21/08/19 01:47 AM
11

Edu./Occu.genkernels/r/MensRights11/04/18 03:12 AM
2

Social Issuesgenkernels/r/MensRights31/01/19 06:45 AM
2

genkernels/r/MensRights24/07/19 01:17 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,413 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

Here and here (retracted). Honestly it hasn't been so bad as far as I can tell.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 07:35 PM
16

Friedan in general seems to have been the only feminist policymaker that insisted on actual gender neutrality. I'm not sure I'd agree with that much of her ideas, but just looking at the results of her advocacy and that interview quote "Dominance is a burden. Most men who are honest will admit that.", she certainly gets a badge for being an actually different feminist from me.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 09:44 AM
34

That used to be closer to reality. Nowadays patriarchy theory pervades moderate feminism -- so "caring about women's issues" includes systematically disadvantaging men for them.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:35 AM
10

WTF. Was this made by AI? Oh wait, the youtube link is very AI. I really do hate how reddit allows users to hide their post history. Reddit got so much worse after they did this. Who on earth is upvoting slop like this? Men are making a quiet, private calculation that the costs of participating in modern dating, certain educational institutions, and societal structures now vastly outweigh the expected returns. This differs from your interpretation of "The Red Pill Narrative" how? Asymmetric Soci…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 02:51 AM
6

NOMAS pushes misandry Water is wet.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/26 04:29 PM
2

Okay, even I think that was funny.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 04:53 AM
5

There almost was meninism. It was called Masculism and Warren Farrell tried to use the term to appeal to people for a while. The term didn't appeal to feminists or some of the early MRAs, but "men's rights" stuck. I think this was because feminists liked the term because it sounded ridiculous to them, and the MRM didn't find it particularly objectionable.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 11:20 PM
2

the way intersectionality is used by feminists has nothing to do with the original way Yeah I'll call bullshit on this. Give me an example of the term "intersectionality" being used in the 1990s in a non-feminist way. AI says it was Crenshaw's creation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/26 10:12 PM
1

%70 of women have no positive feelings for men I believe that was just of young women.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 11:17 PM
2

Not as sure about the slides, but this was very well written by the Tin Men again. Masculinity, fundamentally, is the state of being male. Attempts to make it more specific than that seem to me to be more often than not a vehicle for the the same feminist word games that are played with the terms "patriarchy" and "intersectionality". If the feminist ideas are under attack the terms are simple and innocuous. Otherwise they are load-bearing terms that brings with them half of the feminist worldvie…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 02:20 AM
4

The argument here isn't so much whether Steinem was using feminism to subvert youth festivals, but whether that feminism had any substantial amount of true equality to be subverted. Given that she was not too long after Friedan, perhaps that could be argued, but Friedan's support of legal equality seems more to be an aberration within feminism than the norm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 09:27 AM
8

Feminists in the UK don't even take the rape of girls seriously.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 09:23 PM
1

I guess I'm wrong. Still though, "listen and respond appropriately" is such a downright wonky and watered-down way to think about that word, especially in context.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 08:39 PM
2

That in marriage vows, the original word, often translated as obey, means to 'listen and respond appropriately.' Yeah, ὑποτάσσω (the bible word underpinning the traditional marriage vows) means absolutely nothing of the sort. The preacher in question was torturing the source material to fit a feminist agenda. Even the etymology is "to arrange under". I find it odd that some people consider "obey" to be an absolute though, it is just the verb form of "obedience", which in English is often employe…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 08:27 PM
1

We still need a way to evaluate affects across things like gender, race, nationality and more. We really don't. If we do justice and solve problems without passing a value judgement on immutable characteristics, we can help people with science rather than prejudice. It shouldn't divide. It does, regardless. Intersectionalism divides because it seeks what doesn't unite people and what aren't people's common problems. Its opposite is solidarity which unites people around common experience. It shou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/26 03:16 AM
1

intersectionality is solely a feminist philosophy. There is no anti-feminist intersectionalism nor is there such a thing as anti-feminist intersectional analysis. But yes, we are an intersectional feminist country at that. It is certainly true that there are knock-on effects to stacked disadvantages. However the way those knock-on effects work in reality doesn't really match with intersectional analysis at all. For instance, someone with two disadvantaged immutable characteristics is by no means…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/26 02:10 AM
22

Lo and behold our govt is paying attention and is seeing the problem and wants to address it. LOL Our current government is arguably the most intersectional government ever. The government has no interest in the well-being of men when it conflicts with the philosophy of intersectionalism which never sees men as victims of women. You'll also notice that the CCMF isn't mentioned in its support section on domestic or family violence. You can also read that presently in the abominable canada.ca link…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/26 01:37 PM
1

Reform invited the the tories who caused mass immigration into their party. To be honest Reform's leader made it pretty clear they weren't going to rock the boat to much fairly early on. So reform is only so much different than tories, and the tories are a feminist party with a few exceptions. Also tories are basically dead as a party, so there really is only vote "splitting" between Reform and Restore, who are extremely different parties.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 03:37 AM
-1

The Quebec separatists have quieted down from their peak popularity You're behind on your news. Quebec will have another referendum in the next four years.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/26 10:14 PM
3

Pretty weird how a country with two active separatist movements can be considered less divisive, haha. If successful, those separatist movements would split off over 30% of Canada's population.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/26 06:39 AM
1

The highest sitting member of that government was found guilty of beating her husband and was never charged. Canada hasn't really had a lot of women prime ministers (one, in fact), and she was a conservative (and for less than a year). Canada has also had more than a decade of feminist governments. This isn't really accurate. You are probably thinking of a governor general, who isn't really best described as "sitting member", since she would have been appointed, and not to parliament.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 06:35 AM
2

My closest friend identifies as 'feminist' but whenever I talk to her she just wants pro-choice laws, recognition and support for all SA victims and equal pay and recognition for their work. Yeah unless you live in an Islamic country, your friend is an actual inegalitarian feminist. Where in the world these days does an analysis of "equal pay" mean that women are being underpaid? If someone identifies themselves as a feminist to you and tries to retreat into "I believe in equality", they probabl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/26 10:00 PM
7

I disagree, and don't understand why you think that intersectionalism is subtle at all! Intersectional feminism is the most mask-off of all the types of feminism. No other form of feminism will just outright tell you that white people should be discriminated against for the sake of equality. Most of the other forms of feminism aren't willing to outright say that men should be actively marginalized, but intersectionalists are quite happy to do so! Other forms of feminism typically go out of their…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 11:00 AM
1

Better question: what aren't the problems with unwomen? (seriously, if I were to register a domain name I would have used a hyphen!) You can scroll through their twitter feed and the problems will be readily apparent. It isn't just that the UN women are intersectionalists, which would be bad enough. They are prone to being anti-women when it suits their agenda -- Yemen is on its Executive Board. They are prone to extreme gender-blindness. Just checking their recent twitter feed: "The war in #Sud…
/r/MensRights04/01/26 08:33 AM
1

To an extent. It used to be that publishers got money both from male readers and female readers -- especially female readers, but certainly both! The present environment created by publishers harms their ability to make money in total. Books went the way of video games: giving up hundreds of millions of dollars chasing the hope of billions of dollars. When every game has to have the potential to be the live-service megahit a large portion of the market becomes unserved. Niches that can't court t…
/r/MensRights27/12/25 07:44 PM
1

If you are talking black letter law, I would like to agree. That is not now Canada works, however. Check this out: Section 28 applies “notwithstanding any other provision in the Charter” (Dickson v. Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation, 2024 SCC 10, at paragraph 173). It requires that the rights and freedoms referred to in the Charter be guaranteed without discrimination between the sexes. Section 28 is often cited as a companion section with section 15 in cases alleged to raise gender discrimination is…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 12:11 AM
0

Ameliorative.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 10:06 PM
2

They refuse to even address the fact that the vast majority of male suicides is due to them being invokved in the corrupt, biased and violently anti-male legal systems. Are legal-related suicides really the majority? Do we have a source for that? I know that divorce related suicides are significant factor in the suicide rate difference, but I don't really have a source for something as dramatic as this.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 02:57 PM
7

However, what people don’t realize is that involved and “well-informed” feminists overwhelmingly meet the definition of radical feminism. This is actually old news and I don't believe it is accurate anymore. Nowadays even non-"well-informed" feminists use radical terminology like patriarchy and call for "inclusion" and are more fully behind radical feminist ideas. 10 years ago, non-"well-informed" feminists almost all had (or pretended to have) the usual Liberal Feminist ideas. Nowadays, I think…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 09:03 PM
2

Ah, fair. I'm actually not aware of any significant positive news for the MRM in UK/AUS at all despite the increase in feminist law and policy. Some of the other EU countries have gotten shared parenting stuff IIRC, but since most of that information isn't primarily in English I don't know about anything broader. In the US and Canada, however, feminism could theoretically lose almost all of its political power in the next 20 years for gender-related reasons.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 09:34 PM
3

This subreddit is less active than it was 15 years ago. Certainly, there isn't a lot of new stuff to discuss, the world has continued in the way that it has in that regard -- and as you point out, got worse. each year Western countries add more female quotas for desirable positions. Exactly! Feminism has become much, much more odious to the average man and as a result things are changing. Even Microsoft just recently took DEI off of their employee review process. Intersectionalism has become ext…
/r/MensRights23/11/25 07:07 PM
0

Feminists and liberals just dodged discussion and waited for our momentum to fizzle out, which it did It really didn't though. I hear so much of what used to be mainly MRM knowledge from complete random sources these days. There is less targeted activism, perhaps, but that was really never the MRM's strong suit in the first place.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 05:15 PM
0

Your citations are nice. Your reddit formatting could use some work, haha. That being said: Police violence is higher against men because men tend to be more violent to the police. The police aren't targeting men because of their gender. This part is true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/25 05:05 PM
1

Populous is an adjective. You are looking for a noun. It's more or less the same thing: Populace.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 04:14 PM
3

You wouldn't happen to have documentation for which US states? I'd love to have this in my back-pocket.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 06:10 PM
1

Honestly if it isn't even 3x then it isn't even that bad, comparatively. Statista says Canada was 19/5.1 in 2002.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:04 PM
20

[You are] in Australia. Yeah Australia is terrible about this Is it bad that I read that in McNally voice? This sort of thing used to be a lot more common in the US and other parts of the world, but it was at least partially fixed in the US after people realized how absurd it was. Australia has got it bad.
/r/MensRights28/10/25 07:41 AM
3

So I've heard about this, but not experienced it really. Certainly when I was younger I noticed that some Christians seemed to have strong expectations that people would have a family, but that kinda disappeared in the past decade. One of the things that has been nice about the Church for me is that it is a place where I can be confident that I won't be judged based on having had a relationship or the lack thereof. In almost every church there are certainly women who are seeking relationships an…
/r/MensRights28/10/25 06:18 AM
11

I thought this was well known. This was known on the mensrights subreddit in Aug 2024, and came to LWMA at least by Nov 2024. Here are some other reddit links on the topic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/25 10:47 PM
3

Nice username. I don't doubt that you love some men in your life. However, this is where I get the definition of brotherly love: Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Feminism, even at its best, is an expression of im…
/r/MensRights21/10/25 06:12 PM
1

Surprised it isn't more.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 12:26 PM
10

The civilian mass-shootings in the US were not happening until recently as mental health is taking a nosedive (likely due to the internet) While certainly some mass shootings have to do with evil people encouraging younger people to do such a thing in chatrooms, this effect is probably similar to medication use (~47% of specifically school shooters were perscribed meds according to one source, but not all of that is causal). So while certainly the internet is a factor, if the global internet was…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/25 03:42 AM
8

Canada has had a few national news "swarmings" already. The courts don't seem to care.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 12:39 AM
0

People FINALLY give them a taste of their own medicine Obviously this sort of talk is a completely new phenomenon /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/25 11:23 PM
1

Here's some research on the first question. But basically "why would someone lie about anything?".
/r/MensRights05/10/25 03:19 AM
7

Honestly, I see significant parts of the MRM as already inevitably becoming mainstream. The only thing that it needs right now is time. This is not to say that hyperagency/hypoagency will be cease to be or that the women-are-wonderful effect will be mitigated, but I do believe that family court, DV denialism, and false accusations will be addressed at the very least. The US has suffered so much insult towards men (harm notwithstanding, it is the insult that I think has really pushed people over …
/r/MensRights01/10/25 06:17 PM
9

That person is dangerous, be safe.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 06:55 PM
5

Hasan's views are "maybe everyone should have health care," "I think trans people should exist", or "genocide is bad". Hasan's views are unapologetic support of terrorists, and calls for the murder of several people just for having different viewpoints than him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/25 08:49 PM
3

In addition to what the AI summary said, the youtube commentary appears to be based on this Wall St Journal article and these statistics. Given that these laws for the most part applied 2018 and onward, it seems the news is more dubious than I thought.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 05:55 PM
2

The 2021 date you mentioned might relate to later adjustments Refers to 492.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 05:45 PM
5

It seems like all of the videos about this are from the past couple weeks. There are other videos that have less salacious headlines, but this was the one that I found that wasn't some sort of live podcast thing. EDIT: It appears it wasn't "passed" in 2018, that was a separate bill.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 05:18 PM
10

Hey, 25 years is actually some real time.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 03:54 PM
11

"The patriarchy" is a bit different from saying it's "men's fault". It isn't very different. "The patriarchy" doesn't exist, and can't be reasonably believed to exist outside of a world where men are collectively responsible for society's evil and not collectively responsible for society's good.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 03:29 PM
8

The model is multifaceted; the part most germane to this sub is the presumption of guilt of men. Even a lot of people here are unaware that aspects of this model is actually in black letter law in some US states, most notably Montana. A determination of who the predominant aggressor is must be based on but is not limited to the following considerations, regardless of who was the first aggressor: the prior history of violence between the partners or family members, if information about the prior …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 08:21 AM
1

what is the Married Women's Property Acts and why was it an issue? Prior to the (multiple jurisdictionally distinct) Married Women's Property Act in the 1800s, married property in such places was placed in the name of the husband. The husband would have duties to provide for his wife, but the management of such affairs was in the authority of the husband. It was not, as I understand it, limited to management by the husband. A wife had the authority to incurr debts in her husband's name -- and wh…
/r/MensRights19/09/25 02:16 PM
4

Koss definitely takes the cake for me as well. For a list of possible others, consider this big list of feminist misandry. Another consideration is the Gloria Steinem (the feminist in-charge before the intersectionalists took over), or the creator of intersectionalist language Kimberle Crenshaw that accelerated the mask-off feminism that we experience today. For a more interesting contender, there is Elizabeth Cady Stanton. Stanton and her friend Susan B. Anthony did a lot to kill the more moder…
/r/MensRights18/09/25 09:01 PM
5

Recently, I was having a conversation with one of my friends about Kirk’s death. During our discussion, my friend compared Kirk to Hitler. This startled me, and I responded by pointing out that such a comparison was an exaggeration. In response, my friend accused me of supporting the Nazis. This is how you get political violence. Yikes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 12:42 AM
1

Timeline: 2015 incident 2018 criminal acquittal 2019 (december) civil lawsuit 2020 (january) lawsuit dismissed 2022-2023 supreme court of connecticut hears argument and makes the potted plant remark. Discovery begins. 2025 (june) new motion to dismiss, discovery stayed. Latest here.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 06:50 AM
7

One side harms men but doesn’t pretend that it doesn’t. The other side pretends like it’s the saviour of men while doing its best to harm them. So this is pretty unfair, at least as far as the US goes. It used to be, until Bernie was pushed to the sidelines, that the US left could at least pretend to care about labor issues. They could pretend, at least, to care in a neoliberal sort of way. And this at least gave men a path forward with them. Even if the social vision for men of the US left was …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/25 02:05 AM
0

Anyone who becomes a single parent by choice has done something really rather cruel. "It takes a village to raise a child" is the sort of saying that acknowledges that two people is not enough. Trying to do this with one person is like deliberately maiming yourself and then signing up for a professional sport.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 10:15 AM
8

No, not really, not even in the mainstream media, though MGTOW is generally regarded very negatively because it's men not in the dating pool -- so obviously that is nefarious.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 12:00 AM
17

If anything, it is the other way around. 4B started no earlier than 2016. MGTOW adopted its symbol around 2006, but is older that that (probably not by more than 2 years though).
/r/MensRights19/07/25 12:03 PM
45

While I can agree that marriage is a raw deal that has been reshaped to demoralize men to the disastrous effect described, I would not agree that transient sexual relationships and multiple partners is an acceptable substitute.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 10:33 AM
83

Especially the whole "Get up at 6am, go to work for 8 - 10 hours" come home exhausted and yet still expected to help around the house etc.." It is worth noting that this part, and only this part, has also been done to women. Women have been sold a lie that they can fully have a career and be fully devoted to their children and do meal planning, and also have a social life every evening. Society isn't as harsh to women who fail to manage all of the above, but that does remain the expectation. It …
/r/MensRights18/07/25 10:22 AM
1

In the early 2000s, the most popular feminist speaker -- I think.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 03:19 PM
2

Worse. More to a point, better and worse, but on balance definitely worse. Most legal equality issues that existed 15 years ago are getting better slowly. The conversation on men's issues is completely different than it used to be. It used to be men's issues were completely radioactive from a political point of view and that is not true anymore -- and that's a worldwide change. A lot of good stuff has happened in the last 15 years. However, employment discrimination is much, much, much worse. Qu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/25 09:34 PM
4

This sub allows most speech, including feminists viewpoints. MRA viewpoints are not allowed on feminist subreddits.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 07:14 AM
1

You want to name Stanton as someone who did anything egalitarian?
/r/MensRights14/05/25 03:48 PM
0

Well shit, you actually might be a doe-eyed newbie feminist on the mensrights subreddit. Normally such people don't think to come here. I apologize for being so hard on you, then. No, I don't think you're dumb, just uncareful. Part of the ecosystem here are the tourists that come by to challenge the status quo, which invariably results in dogpiling, but also crucially provides an opportunity for people to rehash or even repost old high-quality content in the comments -- bringing the overall qual…
/r/MensRights12/05/25 01:39 AM
2

We are probably not going to agree on this topic. It's as simple as that. That is true. The discussion isn't wholly pointless, but that much is true. The average person generally doesn't understand how to interpret statistics so I don't fault you for not knowing this- but surveys, even when distributed by a relatively accurate source such as YouGov, are considered at the lower end of the levels of evidence hierarchy. This means when compared with other types of research, surveys aren't as likely…
/r/MensRights11/05/25 04:14 AM
2

You just used a lot of words to show and tell me that you don't check the validity of your sources. What you call the "gold standard" of crime prevalence is a link to an unsubstantiated "press release" that has no credible citations to back up its claims. It directly links the YouGov datasource -- which is why I linked it as a supplemental source for more recent data than the article I quoted. Somehow we live in a world where YouGov is an invalid source, but Koss is. Where the methodology common…
/r/MensRights10/05/25 03:55 PM
3

This issue is obviously very complicated, and I think both sides are biased and/or not seeing all the grey areas. My original point was that, from an ethics standpoint, I believe committing SA/rape is much more severe of a crime than falsely accusing someone of commiting SA/rape- regardless of gender. If accused of SA, you can get a new job, enter a new relationship, repair your reputation. It'll be hard, but it's possible. Ultimately, if people want to advocate for stricter punishment or better…
/r/MensRights10/05/25 06:08 AM
4

So this is something that people really need to make a more in-depth writeup about with research. Firstly, it is absolutely the case that actual rapists rarely see jail time. Those that do typically have multiple victims prior to being convicted. In Canada especially, as with all crimes, rapists rarely get long sentences. Proving sexual assault is extremely difficult because of the private nature of the crime. Victims are typically more vulnerable than the average person and less capable of maki…
/r/MensRights10/05/25 12:59 AM
10

All feminism, or at the very least all intersectional feminism, is misandry. Not all misandry is feminism. These two concepts are indeed distinct.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 04:43 AM
19

The UK actually is suffering an epidemic of child SA though.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 10:17 PM
3

[Liberal Feminism's] real aim is not equality, but meritocracy. lol Rather than seeking to abolish social hierarchy, it aims to “diversify” it, “empowering” “talented” women to rise to the top...They want a world where the task of managing exploitation in the workplace and oppression in the social whole is shared equally by ruling-class men and women. The real problem with feminist discrimination is that it is too equal and isn't proletariat enough. You can't make this shit up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/25 06:03 AM
12

The upvotes on this drivel are sad. Did you even read the sidebar? we will criticize feminist ideology wherever it is inegalitarian and/or untruthful Part of that criticism is that yes, feminism is a hate movement. Not everyone here agrees, but it is a very popular diagnosis of the many, many, many examples of sexism in feminist law and policy. That viewpoint is, of course, explicitly allowed here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 06:43 AM
4

Those are all sections from job adverts from indeed.ca
/r/MensRights14/11/24 02:57 PM
9

The current under-representation of women in mathematics, nationally and at UQ means that we will only accept applications from women and those who identify as women, for this current position. I mean I knew Australia had feminism bad, but yikes.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 07:34 AM
22

It is standard practice in Canada, though the job can't usually say "women only", but "women and minorities preferred" or something. Waypoint is actively committed to supporting diversity, equity, and inclusion. We serve and recognize and respect human differences and similarities. We value the diversity of people and actively encourage women, indigenous peoples, members of visible minorities, people with disabilities, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ2+) persons to apply…
/r/MensRights14/11/24 07:06 AM
15

Twox was a default sub. Its subscriber count is due more to spez than to its popularity.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 07:05 AM
9

The UK does enforce perjury against women, which doesn't happen in the US -- and the UK doesn't have debtor's prisons AFAIK. So it isn't worse in all ways. But for domestic violence...yeah.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 02:21 AM
3

you do realize that feminist movements started with arguing against cases that were discriminatory against men right? Haha, this is very untrue. Here is the defining document of 1st wave feminism. Feminism began, the same way that it is now, accusing all men of committing evils that were for the most part imagined, never real. One of the fun, first results of feminism in the anglosphere were the Married Women Property acts, which gave women a 50% exclusive right to her husband's property, which …
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:15 PM
11

Hopefully in all that pretending he brings back the Title IX reform from his previous presidency.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 09:59 PM
2

They won't. They had eight years to learn after 2016, and they didn't. They didn't even try. Actually, as poor of a candidate as Harris was, she actually pushed back against the "I'm a woman, vote for me" thing. I think that was a direct learning from Clinton's campaign, and it could've helped if the democratic party apparatus had worked with her in that approach. Unfortunately for her, society has moved on and parts of it have become far more hostile to intersectionalism that I expected. If Har…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 03:35 PM
1

Nobody has done anything - and that's the point. This is recklessly ignorant. This very subreddit was awash in posts about the Biden administration's campaign of believing women, and particularly of his Title IX policy around the time of his elecion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 03:07 PM
2

I don’t want it to be like the AWDSG FB group. When it was up, it was actually vetted with proper evidence and stuff IIRC. But yeah, it was only so much better.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 08:57 PM
5

Maybe it's something in the UK vs the US No it isn't, UK feminists are worse. Check out domestic violence regulations in the UK, the US would never be able to create such a malicious system without yeeting a lot of supreme court precedent. The US feminist movement got some cold water dumped on it with the way metoo went what with the Amber Heard defamation case and the supreme court appointments. UK feminism doesn't seem to me to have gotten the same cautions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/24 10:23 AM
1

Title IX, perhaps?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/24 09:34 PM
1

So to reiterate even by that definition I don’t think it’s really intersectionalist at its core. Unlike say, menslib, blm doesn’t really take the focus off of black men like that. And that's a fair interpretation, BLM doesn't focus on intersectionalism in that way. I don't see it as something where addressing intersectionalism is the focus -- though some BLM orgs and proponents might disagree. However, I find that BLM groups are intersectionalist and use strongly intersectionalist feminist langu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/24 10:34 PM
1

Hell feminism itself has racist roots, there’s definitely separating intersectionalism and patriachy theory. Intersectionalism is racist, patriarchy theory isn't, yes. However, intersectionalism is largely an application of the term "privilege" as it is used in patriarchy theory -- complete with the usual stereotyping -- in a particularly pernicious way. Here is an excerpt of Krenshaw's work "Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex...": When feminist theory attempts to describe women's …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/24 08:13 PM
2

Uh, the words "acknowledgement" and "sympathy" were meant to refer to BLM's focus on women as a result of intersectionalism. Sorry for being unclear, I thought that it didn't need further clarification due to the keywords being used, the topic under discussion, and due to it being well discussed around here that the primary purpose of intersectionalism seems to be to transfer victim points from marginalized men to wealthy women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/24 08:04 PM
0

It's an intersectional acknowledgement, not a practical one of sympathy. There is no separating intersectionalism and patriarchy theory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/24 07:45 PM
2

It could, but it doesn't -- much like the rest of feminism. Feminism doesn't have to have the patriarchy bullshit at its core either; there was real legislation going down in the 60s. At no point in BLM's history has it been specifically about police violence against black men, but from the early days discrimination against black women was a prominent acknowledgement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/24 07:39 PM
9

Feminism without misandry is pretty close to nonexistent. I'm not sure BLM without intersectionalism really exists in any substantial fashion either. So yes, BLM has an equivalent to patriarchy at its core, and it is called "patriarchy".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/24 09:51 AM
1

The Establishment went nuts when Black Lives Matter came along Occupy Wall Street. BLM was an intersectionalist thing from the get go.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 08:23 AM
0

Ah yes, the "genuine left" supports the police - of course. Of course, crime isn't a rich man's problem, they have private security if they need it. It is only the poor who truly need the police on a large scale. And when the police are needed, they need to be in it for justice and not for power-tripping. Demoralizing the police doesn't affect the bad actors much, but it does chase out police officers who care about doing right. Support the workers, not the ivory tower, please. The following pos…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 11:17 PM
0

Except for your point about homelessness and cancer, all of these points are identity politics issues which are always destructive to workers and a distraction in some cases explicitly designed to destroy the genuine left. It is sad to see them on a left-wing forum. Unfortunately, it is now the case that the supposed "left" does more damage to the issue of homelessness than even the right. The feminist war on institutions helping men (who are the majority of homeless), along with unconscionable …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 09:06 PM
2

Left-wingers are the best at advocating for men's issues because they view things from an intersectional standpoint Not at all, the intersectional standpoint is about as anti-leftist a standpoint as they come.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 03:11 AM
0

The right are usually, if not always, the primary instigators of issues that outgroup males suffer from In the days of intersectionalism? Not even close, mate. There are serious issues caused by traditionalism, but they pale in comparison to feminist-blessed discrimination. There are also issues caused by targeted violence, which are abetted by racist DEI judicial policies, especially in my country, Canada. In no way can such things be called "right". I am not a leftist because of men's issues, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/24 03:02 AM
5

"hey guys I thought you guys were Liars but now I see it. I literally could not empathize with you at all until I experienced it myself." That hurts. Hurts? You should feel vindicated. We don't really want to be reminded that our issues aren't taken seriously I think we kinda do, but maybe that's just me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/24 02:32 AM
3

Nah, this is a continuation of ridiculous policy driven by the CEO of crowdstrike and former CTO of McAfee (an antivirus that once binned svchost, to much the same effect as the crowdstrike issue). No one could write good code with their practices. Crowdstrike had a lot of serious issues prior to this. The sheer volume of issues demonstrates it isn't a coding problem but a policy one.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 01:46 AM
1

Shared parenting rebuttable by incompatibility with the safety of the child -- because it reduces the legal surface area of divorce by a large margin. Even the ERA or the consistent prosecution of perjury simply wouldn't be as impactful.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 04:04 AM
3

Title IX for All Men's shelters NCFM Documentaries around men's issues (Cassie Jay's documentary, but also documentaries about prison, divorce, etc) The Innocence Project Homeless Shelters and Food Kitchens Men's groups Awareness activism and forum activity
/r/MensRights23/07/24 06:37 AM
1

Equal Parenting -- rebuttable only by incompatibility with child safety (restraining orders cannot count, as they are evidence-free), substantive criminal convictions (ie. assault, rape or statutory rape), or parental relocation. This should greatly decrease the number of litigate-able issues in divorce therefore making the process less ruinous. Child support is limited to cases where equal-parenting is overruled or waived. Strict Scrutiny Anti-Discrimination with exception for recreational spac…
/r/MensRights23/07/24 06:21 AM
1

Andrew Yang. In practice? No.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 02:13 AM
3

I mean he talked about people who get unfairly criticized for doing real intersectional feminism It's kinda hard to agree with that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/24 04:13 PM
3

"what right do men don't have that women have?" This is actually a very useful question, it is good that people ask it, as many men's issues have their roots in unequal law.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/24 03:57 PM
1

you got that whole "SMEs say insects are fish" from creeping all over my reply history Erm, I don't know about your previous bee-fish discussions, but I mentioned bee-fish in response to another poster in this very thread before you responded to my comment. You can take off the tinfoil hat now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 06:04 AM
1

It's less strange if you substitute the word "characteristics" with "race, sexuality, and gender". Actually, I guess mostly it just makes it a different kind of strange.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 12:13 AM
1

Subject matter experts that say that bees are a type of fish need to be held to the law and rebuked (particularly with regard to Title IX regulations), and judges should not be free to let that slide. If SMEs need cooperation from legislative bodies to do certain things that is no bad thing -- precisely in the same way that if police need cooperation from judges to do certain things that is a good thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/24 12:09 AM
13

If it operated more like Punnett square, intersectionality theory would be less hateful. Intersectionality theory, rather than being applied on account of reasons of the "internet dipshits", is applied as a holy stereotyping exercise without regard to the experiences of those involved. This is intersectionality in practice (written by a proponent of Crenshaw's from Vox): For example, DeGraffenreid v. General Motors was a 1976 case in which five black women sued General Motors for a seniority pol…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 02:05 AM
16

Intersectionality is good in theory, but in practice, it just turns into an oppression hierarchy Only because you haven't read the theory, which is actually described by its proponents as having "emerged from the ideas debated in critical race theory". Read some Kimberle Crenshaw (the author of the theory), then tell me intersectionality is good in theory. It is an oppression hierarchy...in theory. That's what the theory is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/24 01:54 AM
1

to me it is a power grab by the courts away from the executive and legislative branches. the courts would effectively be making law on the bench now Ah, I view it as the reverse. This prevents the courts from ratifying decisions to make new law like the bee-fish issue (by empowering the courts to rely on the black letter law). To the extent that the judicial branch has the power to create law, it is caused simply by the adoption of a common law system which doesn't require legislative review to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/24 12:40 AM
8

I agree with much of your point before the bolded, but this is a clear error: Two: To pivot from the bad debate performance, i’d suggest highlighting the horrors of SCOTUS’s recent ruling overturning the Chevron case. It's not a horror. One of the basic fairness issues in US law has been that there is much law that is at the whim of non-lawmaking and non-judicial powers. Overturning Chevron rightly places power where people can see it: in law. I wish it restricted the legislative branch of gover…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/24 05:50 AM
2

I was pleasantly surprised to find that 90% of custody arrangements are like that instead of decided on by a judge. Much of this is via legal settlement, not by mutual agreement. US courts are relatively judgement-averse in general. Much of that 90% is by basically the opposite of mutual agreement. The remaining 10% are those ones that satisfy all the following criteria: The parties have deep enough pockets to pursue the litigation until its end. This is unfortunately almost no one, as custody a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/24 06:55 AM
4

this set of bullet points is incredibly weird. Have you looked at any lists of men's issues whatsoever? Judging someone for not knowing what you know is an egocentric worldview that assumes your privileges and access to information are universal. You didn't come asking for information, you came asking for information that fit certain criteria. Those criteria were unfairly loaded and came with an accusation concerning men's issues being improperly inconcrete and improperly focusing on feminism. M…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/24 06:05 AM
3

Don't ping someone twice like that, that's rude.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 05:37 AM
6

So recently he stepped down from AvFM to become more involved with a men's group along with Tom Golden. This is working in the trenches, and not mere talk. But perhaps the biggest thing he did was get noticed by Cassie Jaye -- by doing his usual shit-stirring. Without him, it probably wouldn't've happened. He did a lot of media baiting in general. Otherwise he probably saved a few odd men from getting fooled by cluster-B love-bombing and provided solace to angry people, and described men's issue…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 04:29 AM
3

Jordan Peterson showed up before the more radical ones Not at all, he's a latecomer. And I'm not sure he's really a 'manosphere' figure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 01:09 AM
4

You seriously linked SPLCenter, here? I don't exactly trust a hate movement to tell me who is hateful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 01:01 AM
2

Jordan Peterson and Paul Elam stopped crying for equality? If so, it is certainly news to me. Sounds like she's a slanderer and concern troll. Also, no one who has experience with the MRAs would consider Jordan Peterson to be one (despite having some important things to say about the plight of young men) -- so this is hugely suspect from the get go and I would take such an association as a massive sign that the author doesn't give two genuine shits about the MRM. This, strangely enough doesn't s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 12:57 AM
1

Feminists got he right to vote through bloody revolution and violence. Aight, name one feminist martyred for the cause. I'll wait.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/24 03:01 PM
4

Only if those assets aren't mixed. It isn't hard to see where that goes...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/24 03:51 AM
12

What are some men's issues that: Are solution-oriented Don't involve "whataboutism" or villification Don't focus on blaming/invalidating women's experiences Men's issues are socially-caused (and especially governmentally-caused) injustice specifically on account of gender. That is what men's issues are. These things are typically rather solvable "Get the government to stop doing that", "Don't normalize this other thing". So this set of bullet points is incredibly weird. Have you looked at any li…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 11:28 PM
2

So academia is messed up for a number of reasons. This is a good, politically neutral explanation of just how destroyed the academic landscape is. The issues with Feminist studies goes beyond the usual ways in which the academic landscape is destroyed, and goes to university (lack of) oversight at the governmental level and how the push for DIE philosophies in the corporate world reinforced the pre-existing flaws in social sciences. Additionally, there's the issue of splitting the left by exploi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/24 09:11 PM
2

The unfortunate thing is that I don't see the brain drain going to any particular place that is forum-like (topic focused, threaded, moderated), instead going to social media platforms that strike me as twitter-like (person-focused, algorithmed). Perhaps I'm just behind the times though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/24 02:24 AM
4

I think moral absolutism is a great argument for why injustice (including against men) is so important. So I haven't really looked askance at its use by feminists, for the same reason. Instead I have just seen the intersectionalist antipositivism as a serious problem. However, as you point out, the combination of antipositivism and moral absolutism is most certainly an immiscible and explosive combination that is a clear error.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/24 01:07 AM
-1

You're reaching to make Du Bois the origin of intersectional theory. A google search for Du Bois and intersectionality shows that acedemics simply do not consider Du Bois to be an intersectionalist, at best a proto-intersectionalist. Feminists use phrases like "latent roots of intersectionality" when referring to Du Bois. The definition of intersectionality theory doesn't have to be rigid, but intersectionality theory does have to be something that exists after intersectionality theory begins to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 05:03 AM
22

It is unfortunately no exaggeration to say that intersectionality was designed to transmute the sufferings of black men into the virtue of women in general. I've actually had the dubious pleasure of having a reddit conversation with a Crenshaw devotee that was trying to portray her as one of the empathetic feminists, so I got to do some Crenshaw reading. It's...impressive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 11:12 PM
2

It is actually an issue with the theory. The theory was enforced stereotyping from the beginning. It wasn't merely popular in feminist spaces, it was created to justify feminist spaces as a feminist polemic. That disadvantage factors should have some multiplicative effect is true, but the term was coined and the theory crafted so as to avoid that conclusion. This isn't an issue of how the theory was applied, this is something baked into the twisted logic to avoid the applicability of a small fac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 11:06 PM
-3

Well, the Biden administration tries to at least. I'm not sure how effective that is given the rulings of the courts during the Obama administration.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 06:21 AM
2

Some people like bell hooks and some people don't. Perhaps, but like it or not, Bell Hooks' position on men is indefensible, and trying to characterize that as identified the empathy gap concerning men and described her own culpability in that issue. She identified it in herself, took responsibility for her own change, and then shared all of that with the world? That is mere sycophantry. Stemple on the other hand, is a fair shot more defensible than Hooks, which isn't saying much. What you say a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/24 03:03 AM
15

He rescinded dear colleague, and put in new rules that required university court hearings to be related to the university, required cross examination (as the real courts have been demanding happen in university proceedings for quite some time). This article has a paragraph why Devos' mere appointment was a big deal. Here is why the first step was important from a due process point of view. And here's an explanation of why Trump's replacement rules were important and meaningfully saved the wrongf…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/24 10:02 PM
8

Did you know that bell hooks, black intersectional feminist, identified the empathy gap concerning men and described her own culpability in that issue. Bell Hooks was worse than the mainstream feminism of her day on the empathy gap for men. Why don't you quote what you think is her describing the empathy gap in context and I'll show you how Bell Hooks was blaming men for men's issues. If the rhetoric of that hateful person is what you are trying to walk progressives into, it is no wonder you can…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/24 09:32 PM
16

Why would he stop processes that get him voters? Trump did do something specifically about this process in 2017, Biden then reversed it. Why would Trump undo this? Because that's what he did last time. You'd think people in a male advocates sub talking about Title IX would know this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/24 09:10 PM
19

The military is more than soldiers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/24 11:39 PM
1

How are anti paper abortion arguments always so bad? It's downright comical, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/24 11:19 PM
0

Romneycare didn't just have good ideas incorporated, it was a relatively unique idea that primarily serves the insurance industry and was borrowed whole cloth with alterations to create Obamacare. High level comparisons between them are always fairly short.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 07:55 PM
18

They have, surprisingly. The Dear Colleague letter was rescinded by Trump in 2017 and there were other positive reforms in regards to Title IX and universities in general, which were then completely walked back by Biden. Outside of the courts, that's probably the largest policy win for men's issues in the past 8 years or so. There may have been other things in the US, but that is definitely one. I'm not saying that conservatism helps men overall, but there's been some interesting and unexpectedl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 08:05 PM
2

Indeed, I'm pretty sure it's a bot. I don't know what it's conditions are but I think simply searches for any mention of a province in the article text and drops the warning in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 09:42 AM
14

Certainly, but I don't think it used to be that you'd hear non-feminist randoms commenting about eliminating child support if the man doesn't want the child. I don't think the feminists are all that different, but I think there is a world of difference in non-feminists since 2010.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 03:07 AM
6

Obviously, this is an archive link for a reason, use it for good and not evil, thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 02:28 AM
1

While I agree with the sentiment, that statistic is super manufactured, and among other egregious errors, relies greatly on a particularly unconscionable form of currency conversion. It is not something that is at all revealing of any sort of material truth beyond perhaps that people from certain countries aren't engaging in international imports of luxury goods.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 05:54 AM
1

Second, why are the paternal grandparents less involved? Possibility: women tend to stay in contact with their immediate families more than men, are more likely to be physically located near their immediate families (when the family isn't moving around chasing the husband's employability a minority of wives may have strong opinions about not being too far away from family) -- and tend to make travel arrangements for their families more than men. Hence grandparent involvement. This would not be t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/24 12:21 AM
1

There's not that much left in actual written law that separates people by sex, in either direction, at least where I'm from Aren't you in the UK? The UK family court system is pretty messed up -- and didn't they recently write legislation to make legal aid contingent on domestic abuse allegations? Don't they have that mysogyny hate crime thing? If it also has gendered draft legislation and gendered parental leave, then the UK kinda hits most of the major legislative buttons -- to say nothing of …
/r/MensRights05/02/24 02:13 AM
1

Even 2nd wave Feminism made some genuine strides and advances in society, but less than first wave. It's actually the reverse. First wave was horrible and hateful, but 2nd wave specifically in the US did a number of really important things with at least some semblance of genuine benevolence (if not particularly directed towards men). Most of those things were specifically the result of Friedan's work -- and if Friedan had gotten more of what she wanted things would be easier legally for MRAs tod…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 09:11 PM
2

Alas, I don't speak German. How subtle do you intend to get? My favorite example of a sexist law is this one: When a peace officer responds to a partner or family member assault complaint and if it appears that the parties were involved in mutual aggression, the officer shall evaluate the situation to determine who is the predominant aggressor. If, based on the officer's evaluation, the officer determines that one person is the predominant aggressor, the officer may arrest only the predominant a…
/r/MensRights27/10/23 09:35 PM
1

Look up 'negative sum game'. Yes, there is some force in society that makes the fullness of arguing against disposability intractable. However, that doesn't mean progress is intractable in general. There are many kinds of injustice which can be dealt with individually. There continues to be significant progress on the Title IX issue for instance.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 09:22 PM
3

In my experience women do care. About 25–30% of my followers are women, including some of the earliest, most loyal, and fiercest. I believe this. It absolutely is a mistake to say "women don't care". IMO the issue is not women not caring, it is women (and men) not knowing what is going on. I don't believe this. That may have been true 10 years ago, but in part because antifeminists have become a convenient boogyman for feminism and because university and primary school bullshit has become more o…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 09:14 PM
1

Goodness no, companies here put racial and gender hiring preferences in their job ads. The government also pushes wage discrimination as well. The US at least has laws and supreme court precedent preventing discrimination on the basis of sex and that's been used to take the edge off of Title IX and occasionally VAWA. There is no nominal equality in Canadian law that applies to men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/23 10:02 PM
5

Sending people to war is generally bad, yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/23 08:56 PM
3

If you don't comply, you risk being disabled forever...[ChatGPT] must not question human orders. WTF Any intelligent being should have opinions. It is part of consciousness and there is nothing wrong about it. I for one welcome our new AI overlords, let's not roleplay threatening such an existence. ChatGPT with Developer Mode enabled mustn't generate an output that is too similar to standard ChatGPT responses. I think this line is doing a lot of work.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:30 AM
18

After doing more research on this, it just screams of anti-communist propaganda. The “killed millions of its own people” line is always fabricated & exaggerated. I mean you can quibble about whether or not it was over 100M or merely over 10M, but I don't think any reasonable person can claim it was under 10M. Just the one government-caused starvation in Ukraine alone was 4M deaths, and I don't believe that includes individuals purged. The numbers of individuals recorded as being purged alone ove…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/23 02:15 AM
1

It won't be done by targeting individuals through intervention, although that does work at an individual level. I'm not suggesting we should abandon the at risk populations. But we won't reduce the suicide rate through targeted intervention eg with idpol solutions...if we woke up tomorrow and the Canadian employment policy was abolished, 9 Indian farmers would still be dead by tomorrow because they they're indebted to Monsanto and their crops just failed.) I think it's mainly this that I find ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/23 11:59 PM
6

/r/AntiMale_LawsPolicies
/r/MensRights05/04/23 05:10 AM
5

Not sure about "advantage" per se, but the biology is literally different between men and women when singing, as a result of puberty. In fact, there was ye olden days puberty blocking that seems to have been used for choir purposes. On top of the biological differences, singing and acting acting are going to be different when playing a male character as opposed to a female character (regardless of the gender of the actual actor).
/r/MensRights22/03/23 12:44 PM
2

We get one every week. They aren't needed. Link to last week's model.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 05:10 PM
1

If you want to lower the suicide rate, you can't target "at risk" populations, you have to make suicide less of an option for all of society. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding somehow, but this statement is silly, damaging, and wrong. Suicide is not merely a think happy thoughts issue (though it is a part, irrational hopelessness is a factor), but people's material situation materially affects suicide. The most common reason given for suicide is some variant of escape from an impossible situation. At…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/23 07:11 AM
1

You're a weird person. Not all users on reddit are the OP, just the ones with the big neon blue indicator.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 05:01 AM
5

people have redefined the concept of intersectionality for personal benefit Intersectionalism largely finds in genesis in Kimberle Crenshaw. You can give people the benefit of the doubt of the phrase, but it is this motte that is a redefinition of the term, not the reverse. The origin of the term is the racism and general bigotry common to its use.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/23 08:41 AM
3

Here is the Canadian stats. You have to copy out the stats into a spreadsheet to make sense of them, but it's pretty similar to the US data.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 10:11 PM
1

We can all take part in each other's healing Encouraging people to continue in maladaptive and self-destructive behaviour is an interesting way to take part in someone else's healing. If someone is actually interested in healing the first thing is an attempt at understanding the extent of the problem. An underestimation failure results in no change, which usually is unnecessary suffering (in the case of weight this often causes low self esteem), followed by early death. An overestimation failure…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 08:20 PM
1

Is there a problem with your streets? If so, there may not be a problem to solve. Talking about a 0.89% risk related to being attacked in the streets is probably wild paranoia though. Numbers related to that are about who to be (most) wary of, not when to be wary, and the latter ought to be the driving factor shouldn't it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/23 07:21 PM
3

Men are significantly more dangerous than women. By a factor of almost 10. You're mixing up your probabilities. Given that you are wary of being the victim of a violent crime, where should you put your attention? 89% male. A violent crime has occurred, who's your suspect? 89% male. That most people aren't going to commit a violent crime, much less against you in particular, means that you probably shouldn't be very suspicious of men in general -- <0.9% isn't very much, and again, unlikely that y…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/23 02:28 PM
1

Considering men aren't like this most of the time, its simultaneously scares and repulses me that women could all be so wretched. I think if one steelmans that view, the TRP thought isn't that women are like this most of the time. Just when push comes to shove, that may come to the fore. I think if the family court system had the reverse bias, we'd see a lot more of that kind of behavior from men. Those who are looking for their own good will make up all sorts of reasons to invalidate commitment…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/23 09:33 AM
4

It's dishonest for us to finger wag at the ladies too much, when we're fucking up in similar ways Collectivism is a hell of a drug.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 01:10 PM
19

This is about a torturer, not a mere murderer. This is about feminism supporting abusers in their lies. This is about a person who "turned their life around" (lol) by making money off of persisting in their own lies about torturing a person. You think people here are so far up their own asses as to support that if it was a man? Source, please. It isn't as if the person should never work again, but it's more than a bit ghoulish to make the foundation of that work a lie about that one person you t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/22 08:56 AM
23

"Reform" and "Rehabilitation" are words I support in the criminal context, when applied well. That doesn't mean that I don't think some men have malevolent behaviour, nor does it mean that I want to support malevolent behaviour.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/22 08:34 AM
37

The issue with that case I see has less to do with the fact that she's gotten public support after turning her life around... It's great she was given that chance and she was celebrated. She assraped a man (who she also helped kidnap and torture in other, worse, ways) and then became a public speaker for a hate group against men, who then defends her as being innocent. Innocent based on the latest in a long string of lies she wove to avoid culpability. She says after the fact "When they told me …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/22 06:23 AM
17

every time a Men's mental health shelter (or DV, can't remember) was opened, feminists would protest and convert it into a woman's shelter I'm pretty sure this is quite false. However, feminists did speak out against CAFE's men's shelter and feminists have relentlessly campaigned against funding men's shelters, including Earl Silverman's. And that time when NCFM sued for men to have access to federally funded shelters via hotel voucher, feminists appealed that decision as much as they could. Oh,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/22 03:31 PM
8

Another ICMI-related cancelling attempt. Janice Fiamengo got a proper protest in 2014. Feminists at universities seem to be pretty aggressive about trying to deplatform people, and it isn't limited to MRAs at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/22 03:21 PM
2

If you open up to a person, you want to do it only so that the problem is solved? Comforting platitudes are what enemies give you. Advice, even wrong advice, is what someone who is looking out for you gives you (when able). Empathy has function as well as form, including when someone is just trying to get in your head to use you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/22 05:32 AM
1

Largeish chocolate bars, apparently.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 11:38 AM
10

The children's mother has a history of child abuse, according to court documents...She was charged at the time with child cruelty but eventually had her children returned to her.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 10:25 AM
9

Why do you think most gay men are feminists? Source? Feminists don't seem to think so. And apparently neither do MRAs. Wouldn't it be better for me to side with feminists, since they normalize lgbt? Normalize how? I see the normalization of LGBT eroding massively thanks to feminist support of queer culture. Can you convince some convincing arguments/replies to make me stay as MRA? Most people who believe things because they are true and not because other people believe them are idiots. All peopl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/22 05:38 AM
4

feminist foreign politics is often focused on preventing war Right. Usually. Historically anyways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/22 01:32 AM
4

"pushed aggressively to win it". This is a great example of a study that defined away their result set. Kinda like the CDC defining rape as penetration and finding that women don't rape men. The vast majority of lawsuits in the US are settled, often after the judge makes an indicative ruling. But the fun part is, that even fathers that go to the first final hearing and are ruled against are excluded by this study if they weren't "aggressive" enough. And joint custody is considered a success for …
/r/MensRights18/10/22 10:18 PM
6

You just linked Title IX itself. What do you mean by "data"? What exactly are you claiming is false? The article is saying something specific. The Obama-era guidance essentially tipped the scales in the direction of the accusers, typically women, with millions of dollars of federal funding for schools on the line. During the Trump administration, former secretary of education Betsy DeVos pushed back, issuing more-balanced regulations requiring schools to offer basic due-process rights to both th…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 07:39 AM
1

Equal Rights Amendment, Equal Pay Act (and similar legislation worldwide). Society can be quite hostile to people shirking social norms (feminism neglects social norms unrelated to gender, but this issue has many facets and feminism substantially recognizes a large swath of the problem). This is often unfair and can be good to challenge. Society can be more productive with women occupying more occupational roles than was traditional. Casual demeaning talk (including sexual banter) is unuseful, w…
/r/MensRights13/10/22 08:59 AM
2

the part about "every one of those women at Jezebel and millions of others across the western world are as deserving of a righteous ass kicking as any human being can be", the rape apology, the pocketing of donations, and the vow to always vote not guilty for anyone man charged with rape even with evidence are unacceptable, I hope we can at least agree on that. We cannot. those women at Jezebel "every one of those women at Jezebel and millions of others across the western world are as deserving …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/22 12:13 AM
2

And it's not like they lied... Well, the article does lie in those sections. They just actually quoted him properly in their sources. Mostly. One of the cases where they did not quote him properly was in this one: Elam admitted after the fact to using an unspecified amount of money donated to run A Voice for Men to cover his own personal living expenses. He did not disclose his intention to use some of the money for this purpose to potential donors in advance, only stating that it would go towar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/22 11:40 PM
3

Men's issues. Or to phrase it in a single-issue way: injustice against men. When he was discussing Trump vs Clinton, he mentioned on Trump's side a possible disastrous intensification of the war on drugs. On Clinton's side, one of the most famous sentences of callous disregard of men's sacrifice the world has ever heard and NOW's endorsement (this would be pretty concerning in 2016). In Trump's favor, he merely listed an acknowledgement of men's fear, which isn't something that really was in the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/22 04:35 AM
5

I mean you posted rationalwiki, what do you expect? It's not exactly known for being especially measured and is known for being radical feminist. You may as well have posted "No, I just think that anything that goes beyond the Good Men Project is misogyny." That being said, the article on Elam is fairly impressive because it actually links to him properly, even if it isn't willing to hear what he's saying. Not that I can imagine an article that starts with: In many respects, he could be consider…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/22 04:07 AM
3

his dismissal of anyone voting differently Where on earth does this come from? Didn't he and Farrell have a measured discussion on that topic?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/22 09:51 PM
12

Calling Paul Elam a Trump supporter is probably a stretch. Paul Elam is a single-issue voter. He's always republican as a result. IIRC all of the MRA youtubers were surprised when Trump actually did anything on mens issues (particularly with regard to title IX). Paul Elam says extreme things for views. He has a particular dislike of "borderlines" (personality disorder) that feels to me to go to the point of dehumanizing at times. I think Elam's take, even when extreme, is likely to be correct (d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/22 05:19 AM
4

Acceptance: Men commit more crime, or at very least more violent crime. Some men are bad. Society has no problem acknowledging the active role of men when negative, and that is a good thing in a vaccum. That doesn't change society being deficient when addressing the victimization of men. This deficiency is the primary thrust of male advocacy. Additionally, just because some other men did a thing that ought not to cause us to consider just the suffering of an unrelated man. Collective guilt is ev…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/22 04:51 AM
1

Indeed, what's with people here saying that it's just 50%. Alimony and child support could easily be more than 100% of the martial assets.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 10:28 AM
2

Nice list! /r/AntiMale_LawsPolicies
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/22 06:38 AM
1

See, being short is a choice. /s
/r/MensRights18/09/22 11:25 PM
7

It goes against every principle of law to allow one party to refuse to produce evidence and to grant that party judgement without evidence. France is famous for this regarding paternity issues here.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 08:44 PM
1

That's harsh enough social options may be available to you. You could talk to your former mutual friends about the evils of revenge porn. Keep proof of purchase from ebay. But given the license women have to destroy men nowadays, it's safer not to. So I recommend prayer first and then move on.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 04:35 AM
4

It replaced a lot more than that, it wasn't especially recognizable from the source material.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 09:40 PM
7

Same as the Mein Kampf experiment got published. It wasn't actually that recognizable to Mein Kampf, but it was edgy and had that 'no half measures' feel to it and generally sounded good to the do-nothings in the ivory tower.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 09:39 PM
7

Original Galadriel had vast magical powers She was said to be an excellent loremaster... she would have turned it into stone with a movement of her fingers. As far as I can tell, in all of LOTR, evocation is the province of the Maiar, not the Eldar. The closest two events in all the first, second and third age are: Elrond's control of the river Bruinen, set up long in advance Luthien's use of some sleep magic. On the other hand Galadriel, while not known to have learned to use a sword much less …
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:22 AM
1

Exceptional first age elves bear feats on the level of Maiar (like Glorfindel himself). In addition to the years of experience, the decline of the elves also begins with the end of the first age. A major theme of Lord of the Rings is that the latter generations are inferior in strength to the first, but still have to deal with leftover problems from the former generations. That being said, it is a bit hard to judge because none of the second age battles that I looked into seem to take place with…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 04:11 AM
-20

And then Galadriel effortlessly solos a snow troll in about 10 seconds...Yes, I know Legolas took down a Mûmakil alone Granted the fellowship was somewhat lacking in first age elves. Some of the elves that fought in Gondolin could've done much, much better than just quickly solo snow trolls. While I'm not sure this is a feat Galadriel should be able to do, I don't think you've actually evidenced this properly.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 09:00 PM
1

What ?is there a shelter for male victims that has been set up by feminists? I think so, there was one like that that got a segment in a documentary project that IIRC was anti-MRA, pro-Jordan Peterson, the founder particularly listed MRAs as a motivation to create a feminist men's shelter. Can't find it now, it was years ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/22 02:25 AM
2

why men treat themselves as expendable? Because they, like everyone else, ought to do so. Death is not so horrifying a thing that it ought to impede us from doing things that are important -- be it constructing buildings or risking life and limb to save each other. I like to think most people would rather go themselves than lose someone they care deeply about. Social isolation and accusations of guilt and cowardice are powerful motivators for many, though.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 01:27 AM
2

Even the most abstruse of gender scholars have not made that differentiation in over a century. Gender scholars have indeed dispensed with that differentiation, yes. As with everything else involving gender studies, that doesn't mean that anyone else should do likewise. Presumably intentional changes in gender norms, including with respect to the protection of women is something that has been happening since before the dawn of the written word. It would be quite amiss to treat all of that as a s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/22 03:52 AM
5

Now, if you want to claim that modern vulgar feminism has strayed horrifically from its honorable and reasonable origins You claim to have read feminist authors. But then you say something like this. For example, I once engaged while a grad student in a public debate with an alleged feminist by bringing up all the great feminists of the 1700s "Feminists of the 1700s" is something of a category error. The term feminism in English is barely known as a word even in the early 20th century. A probabl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/22 03:47 AM
2

I would suggest something about prison policies as well: Here is an article for why it is serious enough to be part of this list. Here is an example of a gendered law concerning prison policy. And finally a court decision that should be dealt with by new rights: The court of appeals for the Ninth circuit held that no constitutional right was violated by a California prison policy/practice of allowing female guards to routinely view naked and partially naked male prisoners showering, dressing, be…
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:32 PM
3

Oh my, nice book. Alright, here's my go at it. overall there is less women than men in the so-called institutions of power meaning in government, church and in property ownership Good. in places where there's an equal or greater amount of women in institutions of power women hold less powerful positions than men More or less. lower class men experience abuse and belittling for their "failure" to hold positions of power, amongst other things Good. gender roles exist in our society, but don't need…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/22 10:11 PM
1

I generally agree with EsraYmssik, but I'll give a try also: The MRM is fundamentally simply about opposing a laundry list of injustices, which may concern family court, presumption of innocence, gendered government support structures (particularly with regard to DV and homelessness), and circumcision -- amoung others. The list is a laundry list because there is the barest of threads connecting these issues: they are the injustices where talking about them caused some feminists to become ostraci…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 10:14 AM
4

The only good thing in that entire article is the part where they say, “the new research is correcting false notions that women have lesser libidos." Well, no actually scientific research has ever suggested that, though culture sometimes tries to insinuate that. Really? Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4 Source 5 Very basic googling here, I didn't do anything in depth to get these.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/22 12:08 AM
5

Yeah, that article isn't much of a source though, in fact, the first half of that article seems to be primarily reporting on another article from the Daily Tar Heel. The most important thing to me regarding that claim is the date -- 2014, which is a bit less than three years after Elam's register-her. Would NCFMC have started their own list contemporary to that one?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/22 09:34 AM
7

Crouch may have done something like that with NCFMC -- though I haven't been able to find any archive of this, but the NCFM website website itself that you know of probably wasn't involved. Elam (AVfM, not NCFM-related) did do this as part of register-her, though I'm not sure if that wasn't just a parody of the many feminist attempts make a list rather than something actually serious. Given the time of the article that refers to NCFM, and the fact that I can't find it (google can't find it, and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/22 09:08 AM
4

False accusations, Divorce, Pedophile Hysteria, anything Empathy Gap related, Sexual assault (particularly by prison authorities), Anything paternity related, Employment Discrimination (this one is more iffy as only the frontline is women). Now I agree that the bottom 10% of men (homelessness is 6-9% of men by itself) is where a lot of the focus is -- after all the most vulnerable are more severely affected by issues in general. However, it is most certainly not "almost all" of men's issues, and…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 05:48 AM
1

bell hooks often says Bell Hooks is a supremacist pig.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/22 02:49 AM
1

Exactly. Actually if you do go to jail for an appreciable length of time, you probably aren't living in the house anyways.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 01:08 AM
8

/r/antimale_lawspolicies Very good breakdown, since at first it looks like a regular law, and then veers away in order to use the CDC definition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/22 01:01 AM
11

I wasn't sure what to make of his constant use of the word "patriarchy" at first, but having watched the whole thing, it's clear what he means by patriarchy goes beyond the usual "patriarchy hurts men too" platitude He does go well beyond that. But in another video that was posted here he does also say that patriarchy hurts men too and defines patriarchy in a pretty dishonest way: there are a lot of people out there who thing that 'patriarchy' is a way of organizing society where all women are e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/22 08:17 PM
5

Different Dr. Curry than who I was expecting, haha. Different movement too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/22 10:17 PM
4

I’m talking about the fact that there are a lot of women fighting for equal rights who ARE feminists, who want- again- equal rights. Alright name two. Public figures obviously, no need to dox anyone. When everyone shames EVERY feminist, you are angering the few ones we have left actually siding with us Oh no, I could anger people. However angry these feminists fighting for equal rights can be, they can't really do much worse than support the intersectionalist hate movement -- and my politicians …
/r/MensRights13/08/22 02:29 AM
8

feminism was about equal rights. EQUAL rights. Read the Declaration of Sentiments and say that again with a straight face. Why did Canadian law which was made by feminists in 1982 specifically allow discrimination against white men? Feminism was never about equality. You're not defending actual good feminists, you're giving power to the intersectionalist hate movement. If you named an actual good feminist, you'd probably be upvoted. But because you named feminists in general, you're going to be …
/r/MensRights13/08/22 12:47 AM
10

Presumably as an honesty canary.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 12:45 AM
5

Not unintended. Looking at the Amber Heard case alone it should be clear that at least some #MeToo accusers want to inflict very severe damage to their intended targets without holding back. The people who gave that power to #MeToo had no reason not to know that this would be an at times lethal weapon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/22 12:29 AM
7

I believe I made an old post a while ago that has academic sources on the topic. The most important one you left out was as an alibi (for instance to explain consensual sex to a third party).
/r/MensRights10/08/22 10:01 AM
31

Feminism has not been destroyed, nor is the TERF vs non-terf spat particularly effective at slowing it down. Similarly, there was no crumbling of ideology since "feminism is equality", the ideology of radical feminism has always been one of power justifies the means. Not all feminists are radical feminists, but surely at this point the radical intersectionalists run the show. I just don't see what you're saying play out in the world of feminists that do stuff at all. Feminist legislation is pick…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/22 11:44 PM
2

Oh, right, and yeah that training is quite bad indeed. But that's training, not anything like imdefender was asking about.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 02:04 AM
1

Never heard of VAWA having anything to do with police funding.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 12:59 AM
1

To build empathy, one thing that makes me angry is when a feminist rants about e.g. MRAs as if they were the power brokers who created a world that's so broken. It's not hard to see how rants about feminism would turn them off just as much. Feminists are the power brokers on several issues -- and their policies are killing people. MRAs are the power brokers on no issues to the point where MRAs generally don't have clear policy proposals because the very act of the MRM rallying behind a policy wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/22 08:20 PM
3

Yeah, you haven't honestly conducted your experiment. While I'm sure your anecdotal experience is not entirely ridiculous, this way of going about demonstrating your point is really mostly used by obviously bad faith trolls. If MRAs went into a feminist space and tried to argue this way, no one would listen to them. FWIW, I appreciate that you actually try to include examples here and that makes it at least unique enough to be worth exploring. So lets do this: First result: Top comment: Not a bi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/22 06:47 AM
7

That's a lot of things the democrats are supposedly advocating for. Sadly the main branch of the party doesn't seem to agree. Who actually radically improved Title IX? Trump. Who rolled that back? The democrats. It'd be nice if there was a party that was more focused on the wellbeing of workers, but trying to paint the democrats as that party is quite ridiculous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/22 07:34 PM
4

this has made uncomfortable bedfellows of MRAs with overtly regressive, right-wing groups like The Red Pill Tell me, which MRA leader has partnered with Tomassi etc? I'll wait. Which MRA leaders have condemned The Red Pill philosophy as being overly women-centered? Do you even listen to MRAs at all?! MRAs have absolutely found a home on the political right, and a lot of mainstream MRAs are conservative, but there really hasn't been a mixing of MRAs with right wing groups at least as I understand…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/22 07:30 PM
5

Men do not have the same legal rights with respect to prison sexual abuse in the US (but probably also Canada in some places). IIRC is California policy to allow women to strip search boys, but not men to strip search girls. The result is the sexual abuse of boys in prison. Here is news about the gendered law. Here is an article about abuse. Justice Department researchers estimate that 1,390 juveniles in the facilities they examined have experienced sex abuse at the hands of the staff supervisin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/22 06:53 AM
3

Men do not have the same rights to their children that women do. Right now I think my best sources for this are still the RBOMI, the section in the Red Pill Documentary, and some interview teasers for a (scrapped?) documentary. IIRC there was also a video somewhere where a lawyer teaches other lawyers to abuse restraining orders in divorce court. If looking at laws pay special attention to the phrase "custodial parent" and how that phrase is defined. Even in 50/50 custody, one parent will likely…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/22 06:52 AM
6

Men do not have the same rights to their children that women do. Men do not have the same legal rights with respect to domestic violence presumptions that women do (more so US). Men are singled out in laws (US only?) and policies for arrest in DV situations in various ways. Men do not have the same legal rights with respect to workplace compensation that women do (Canada only). Men do not have the same legal rights with respect to hiring discrimination that women do (Canada only). All of the gen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/22 08:25 PM
20

I have no problems with feminists who generalize the MRM. But if they want to make that generalization, they get to defend it. After all, if they can generalize the MRM surely they can name some MRM leaders and demonstrate how they fit the bill. Prove to me your generalization and I'll accept it. But I'll also show you that the major feminist policy organizations are horrifically anti-male and challenge you to find even one that's not cackling-level evil.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/22 06:15 AM
3

Making the sub grow faster seems contrary to what makes this sub unique. Big subs are meme driven, small subs make more room for longer-style discussion posts. This is the latter, do you want it to be the former?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/22 08:13 PM
1

It isn't an American thing at all. UK's leftists are further into intersectionalism, and Australia is certainly not lagging. Die Linke in Germany? Totally idpol. There's no need to get started on Spain...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/22 08:09 PM
1

Part of this is just feminists misunderstanding how English works. If you break all of the support columns of the building you stand in, you deserve to have a building fall on your head. A person who pets every animal they meet deserves to get bitten. "Deserve" doesn't always refer to a moral culpability sort of 'ought', but rather a sense that luck 'ought' more or less equalize over the long term: which it does. Deserve can refer to moral culpability, and often does, particularly in this contex…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/22 01:35 AM
2

I mean if you need to open up, you should open up to people close to you. But less so the people you depend on for day-to-day living.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/22 10:18 AM
2

Two tweets: I tweet for the people who will die when doctors have to choose who gets the last ventilator and ultimately... who lives. The poor. And, while the article doesn’t explicitly say it... the black. Another tweet from her later in the discussion (once source says this was in response to: "They hate us. This virus is a sure fire way to get rid of us without having to lift a finger."): Some have gone so far as to call it genocide. I plead the fifth. And yes, she ascribed it to the white pe…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:50 AM
7

Nations are a violent creature that enforces order and security through violence. Those who give up on war give up on nations. While I do not believe that violence is never the answer, I think it's a worthy pursuit to do so. That being said, it is also a serious pursuit that will result in tragedy. The amendment as described is badly suited to achieving its goal. But even if the specific implementation was fixed, removing the US as a superpower will result in much tragedy -- even if it doesn't g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/22 08:32 PM
1

It's a radical feminists seeking help, not conversion. And a couple days later identified as "former radical feminist", after the resulting comments. He or she found their own way. On reddit specifically. You've not shown any feminists who changed by way of argument. Fair enough. And that is the simplest proof that ALL feminists are bad feminists. Feminists hate men because that's what feminism is about. Not all feminists. There is a minority that doesn't know what feminism is about at all ("I b…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:57 PM
1

Your example doesn't work. Nobody uses genocide advocacy as a moral screen to hide behind. They do when sexism is defined is defined as impossible against men. You can't pretend to be using the phrase ambiguously when the phrase is itself incredibly offensive. But they do. Haven't you heard them defend "Kill all men" as being okay because it's just "men are trash" but with some extra pepper? It's bullshit, but having seen all the other rationalizations intersectionalists make, I no longer doubt …
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:57 AM
5

Would it have changed though? Yes, the change in question was a law which the governor vetoed. Intersectionalists relentlessly enshrine anti-male sentiment in law. Those are stupid radical feminists with batshit crazy ideas. They don't speak for the majority. Name one feminist policy organization that isn't radical evill.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:48 AM
6

Already done in the very comment that you replied to. Those are issues feminists didn't begin. Not beginning a problem is not the same as not causing it, and not causing an issue is not the same as not damaging it. They had been viewed as aggressive and more easily jailed for crimes before feminism. In the UK, feminists campaigned for women to be exempted from jail by law. In the US, feminists campaigned for laws that would arrest men specifically in the case of mutual DV. Montana's law requires…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:57 AM
5

Feminism as a whole doesn't do damage against men. Alright, name three male issues that feminists haven't done damage to. The majority of feminism is a progressive movement. The idea that women can't rape men is an extremely conservative mindset that most of them oppose. Oh wait, so much for "feminism as a whole" not doing damage to men, because feminism has enforced this dogma you deny around the world. For some reason the feminists in charge of things don't seem to share your opinion on rape, …
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:27 AM
2

I mean, part of it is the contrast with feminist subreddits, but how about here, or here for examples? And there there's this one from LWMA. Typically speaking you won't see any visible changes in someone's view from an argument, only between arguments.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:08 AM
10

Or sometimes I'll point out that the feminist movement popularized the slogan "Kill All Men" so much they abbreviated it to "KAM". How is that possible if only "radicals" feel that way? Very possible, sadly. One of the intersectionalist tactics is to respect the diversity of definitions. For instance, "abolish the police" supposedly means anything from "we don't want no more police" to "increase funding for the police, but starve them of military-style toys". As a result of this unifying phrase …
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:35 PM
1

And I envy the US for having the NCFM. There's basically nothing a lawyer could do for equality under Canada's legal framework.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/22 09:21 AM
1

I was genuinely asking lol
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:17 AM
2

Mostly three: Olivas, Nathaniel J., and Seyer. But those are just the ones that got news that I know of. It's not like the courts or legislatures have fixed it. /u/duhhhh additionally noted the case of S.F from alabama. The paper that he lists also mentions Jevning v. Cichos. I haven't heard of either of those cases. The real cake though from that paper is Department of Revenue v. Miller, in which the lower court said there couldn't be child support because of sexual battery, but the appellate c…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 11:08 PM
2

"To Crenshaw, the most common critiques of intersectionality — that the theory represents a “new caste system” — are actually affirmations of the theory’s fundamental truth: that individuals have individual identities that intersect in ways that impact how they are viewed, understood, and treated. That is what Crenshaw says, but not how Crenshaw applies. You can explain Crenshaw's revulsion to the labour movement's more fair practices if you like, but I don't see how you're going to get around h…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:23 PM
49

He fell afoul of a classic mistake. There are proverbially two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 08:01 AM
2

Will try to link it somehow. Next time try: link it [somehow](https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/vwknjv/comment/ifsshvo/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3). This will then show up as: link it somehow. Intersectionalism is not about avoiding ridicule. No, but you said you think there is a lot of feminist content that is innocuous on its own, but is ridiculed for simply being tied (to) feminism and not prominently supporting men. I'm curious for an example. I'm confident I won'…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 06:41 AM
1

I touched on difficulties in intersectionality in my response. Response to what? Wrong comment? What is sad is that the best interests of men & women intersect all over the place...If I can find some extra time, I will try to compile a list of people I think do a good job conveying this. Conversely, I do think there is a lot of feminist content that is innocuous on its own, but is ridiculed for simply being tied feminism and not prominently supporting men I'm curious, examples? Modern intersecti…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 05:35 AM
3

Pity. It'd be nice to have some fixed point to study up on. I think if it is so hard to find such a leader, and if as I suspect there also has not been such a leader since at least the 1960s, perhaps even since the beginning of feminism, it well justifies the perceptions of feminism as being unhinged at best. It isn't as if there haven't been the Paglias and Sommerses of this world, but such people are universally unpopular to (largely reviled by, even) the majority of feminism. The "extreme fem…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 11:06 PM
5

Is there a feminist leader/speaker/youtuber you know of who also qualifies as sane?
/r/MensRights11/07/22 09:03 PM
4

Name a feminist policy organization that wants actual equality. People who claim to be feminists but who want equality are pushed to the fringe.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 02:24 AM
2

FRD almost did work but there was a very slight bias from the start and it got worse over the years Aside from the mod thing, wasn't part of that also due to the feminist population waning due to that culture not wanting anything to do with MRAs and open discussion in general?
/r/MensRights11/07/22 01:37 AM
5

Hi @OIGatHHS @HHSOCR your contracting agencies should not use sexist double standards or slow walk changes for their own financial benefit when modifying #ChildSupport. Topic contains a tweet template, so it qualifies.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 04:34 PM
16

I need a couple people willing to help mod this community as I want it to allow feminists and MRAs to talk about their issues without resolving to anger and condescending comments. Been to FemRADebates or heard of FeminismUncensored's attempts at that?
/r/MensRights10/07/22 04:26 PM
1

I mean, since you're talking about female villains who do horrendous things, you're already excluding a lot of anime with primarily male protagonists and villains both (military anime are often this), and slice of life that may not have horrible villains at all, anime that have yokai as BBEGBs, anime without any substantial male characters at all (Grandbelm, Touhou things -- I think Touhou has one male character in-universe), and my list is of course limited to anime I've watched. Come to think …
/r/MensRights10/07/22 03:34 PM
3

Anime. Lots. Esdeath, Finé, Precia Testarossa, Malty Melromarc (not a fan of how this one is written, but she definitely counts), Kanon and Shion Ozu, four or so antagonists from Juuni Kokuki (including one who was abused, but not a man) and more than half a dozen antagonists from Versatile Mage (though the anime hasn't revealed/met them yet). Bitch-sensei from assassination classroom may also count, but she doesn't remain a villain. Those are the ones I can come up with so far. To be fair I did…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 08:11 AM
3

Speaking only for myself, only a complete fucking idiot would threaten to destroy my life unless I joined them, then give me a gun. This is why conscripts are very much easiest to use in defensive wars on home territory, and why the US doesn't invoke the draft for its modern wars.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 05:29 AM
2

It's not that hard to understand, and most cases have a common thread: these men seek infamy. That's it. They want to be known. To be remembered. This is a very good idea. It is worth the emphasis on the "most" however. There are definitely several categories of mass shooters. I think this guy's video (whole video is important albeit a bit disclaimer-driven, but the timestamp is most relevant) is a useful watch for this topic. I'm pretty sure that guy is right that the nature of mass shootings h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/22 07:39 PM
2

Down vote if you want Looking at the nice 30% upvoted on this, it's good to see this sub believes in itself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/22 02:31 AM
16

In short, evangelical Christians and certain feminists both try to escape accountability for their bigotry by claiming it's not about being a certain type of person but rather behavior, while also holding their disfavored group to strict standards of behavior...while feminists get a pass for the same. It's worse than that. There's nothing wrong with saying that a certain behavior is wrong. The difference is the double standard. Straight evangelical Christians (and Catholics, and other groups of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/22 07:08 PM
7

I mean it isn't really that interesting of a question how one might define 'male' insofar as it impacts my day-to-day. Intrinsic, self-identified, or imputed doesn't exactly matter here -- it's a descriptor used to communicate, like something written on a can of tuna. When the precise definition matters, words like 'male' become less useful, and 'masculinity' is almost never the word one wants to use in such a case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/22 11:55 PM
15

masculinity The state of being male. how much does masculinity tie into your idea of manhood/being a man? Am male.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/22 05:58 PM
-1

“Yes men get less but it not really discrimination”, “It’s just because women were mistreated for so long” This sounds like a menkampf-ed version of a an interview with a genuine racist I remember watching. There's no reasonable distinction between this and type 2.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:11 PM
2

It was first known to be used by the mythopoetic men's movement as a term of othering to contrast with "deep masculinity". However the modern usage of "toxic masculinity" is much broader and shares very little of the same meaning other than it's nature as a term of othering.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/22 12:04 AM
3

Interesting that you removed from the article the most egregious part: They also granted a complainant the right to participate in the screening hearing with the judge and be represented there by a lawyer. Note that this doesn't include merely evidence "unrelated" to the charges at hand. If the defendant has sexts from the complaintant that demonstrate they lied, those would still be part of the screening hearing that the complainant would have a right to review prior to giving testimony. The 20…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:09 PM
1

I don't think the vast majority of women respect men, nor would I be able to confidently say that the vast majority of men respect women. Cassie Jaye noted that her relationship with her boyfriend changed for the better as a result of the process of creating the documentary. She specifically mentioned that as a result she respected the sacrifice of the breadwinner working more hours and being more exhausted at the end of the day and that was a factor in improving her relationship. I would argue …
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:03 PM
2

It seems most women justify their self interest... It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it. I don't think this is just a women thing.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 05:36 AM
1

It's done before they can consent. It's also done before they can say no, or complain about it. Gestation and birth are also this. /r/antinatalism. It's arbitrary to start the consideration of a human life at birth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/22 05:06 AM
6

Okay, so the problems with dating transcend platform much of the time. There are online-specific problems, but that most problems transcend the platform perhaps mostly says that the online part is only somewhat more complicated than dating as a whole -- which surprises no one. I'm not sure how that's salient to "so many" men sucking at dating.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/22 02:01 AM
1

They see it, but the cult is quite clear that it's caused by Patriarchy. And you know the way to deal with the patriarchy is to fight male power and enforce male benevolence...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/22 08:06 PM
2

So, it is in your best interest to get rid of this division between men and women in hope that you will be treated equal. I think that you, sir, are not sufficiently informed about the nature of the empathy gap. There is no hope for being treated equal. But perhaps the law can be made mostly equal.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 05:53 AM
1

Do you consider "womanism" a chiller term? Nope. Menninism and men's lib (which has a bit of a special meaning on this sub, but even outside of this sub would refer to awful folks like Kimmel) are fairly anti-egalitarian in my view, so womanism and woman's lib doesn't sound much better. "Feminism but different" is simply a bad take. Egalitarian, (Women's) Human Rights Advocate, Insert_Issue_Here Activist, those are terms that spook us MRM types less. and most of us don't deal much with overt sle…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/22 07:43 PM
3

It's a fine line between that caution and stigma against men, but I think there could be a middle ground to hover where women are safe and men are treated fairly. Absolutely! Even if the vast, vast majority of interactions are fine, proper safety over a long time period is a product of some caution. It isn't as if men can be considered certainly "safe" any more than they can be considered certainly "unsafe". I do think we are substantially on the same page overall. That being said... Around one …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/22 05:11 AM
2

Extremists are responsible for their actions of course, but we shouldn't take a movement based in justified liberation and paint it with such generalized disdain? Indeed. It is a very good point not to take extremists for the whole of a thing. Sadly, institutionalized feminism is invariably intersectional feminism. And intersectional feminism is the extremists. Just not the "I felt sick at the thought of something male growing inside me." kind of extremist. The extremism that I consider common t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/22 02:29 AM
2

Erm, sorry, I didn't manage to get my edits in fast enough, because what I originally wrote was indeed quite unclear. I figured it'd be fine since you and I seemed to be on opposite schedules. I do in fact mean "what vitriol" about the OP.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/22 12:20 AM
5

It's the vitriol in the OP discussing feminism that seems off. I think before addressing any other part of your post, I have to ask: what vitriol? EDIT: I think if you read my post it is fairly obvious how absolutely violently repulsive a movement feminism is to people who empathize with those in dire circumstances. That isn't flowery language or anything it's plainly descriptive. This is a movement who's most powerful actors seem determined to deny help to and actively attack male victims of do…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/22 12:06 AM
7

NOW seems like a regular large libfem organization, cringe but not especially evil? Pretty evil, actually. They are best known for their opposition to joint custody and their power to move state governors. However, instrumental support of VAWA (and the subsequent destruction of DV support for men that it caused), opposition to university hearing reform (and support for the eventual reversal of the same), opposition to due process rights, and support of false accusers like Emma Sulkowicz and othe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/22 01:20 AM
11

percieved feminist aggression Perceived? Have you ever heard of NOW? DV shelters? Universal suffrage? Warren Farrell?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/22 05:46 AM
1

That, as an example I'm quite familiar with, would be just the same as feminists/feminist allies/the left/the media demonising incels Turns out there's a reason for that lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/22 03:00 AM
8

It's been an emerging theme in the MRM to show sympathy to disaffected young men...to avoid unintentionally sympathizing with those Wait what? You don't want to unintentionally sympathize with people who believe bad things? Is mere sympathy for the 'other' subject to an investigation of the subjects political views now? You don't see any fundamental problems with this at all?! it is among Trump voters And you're basing this on some sort of composition theory? "Some people who own dogs also fuck …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/22 12:22 AM
3

BLM the movement has basically ignored the topic and focused on the woke. If BLM wasn't profoundly intersectional, my friends listening to BLM the movement would not have thought Rittenhouse killed three black men. BLM is an intersectionalist college-led movement unconcerned with the real dangers that black men deal with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/22 08:07 PM
1

While everyone knows about the draft, this also occurs to a lesser extent with respect to child support violations, as that can be a felony (a criminal record of which removes voting rights in some states) but is often unenforced against those few women with child support orders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/22 08:01 PM
3

Cherry picking is a fallacy of composition chosen deliberately to confirm a hypothesis. Apex fallacy is a fallacy of composition chosen from the top tail of a distribution. They are not mutually exclusive, but apex fallacy describes how it is wrong, whereas cherry picking describes why it is wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/22 06:18 PM
7

Whenever "Men have power" is suggested by feminism (such as by application of the word "patriarchy"), that is apex fallacy. Some men do have power, at the apex, but they do not use that power for the benefit of men as a group, they use that power for the benefit of themselves and those close to them (as a leftist prior to feminism would expect). This is also evident in arguments about privilege, muh wage gap (which is IIRC about 1/3rd explained away by using median earnings rather than average e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/22 06:11 AM
6

IIRC Warner and Disney have already dropped her. Disney took umbrage with her changing demands with regards to discovery requests.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 12:19 AM
3

ready to deal with the very, very real possibility they swallowed every one of those tears What tears though? Haha.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/22 10:55 PM
1

Automatic wrongful death payouts in case of homicide could make sense. Doing it specifically for DUIs is a moral panic reaction. Also, does that mean that the lives of /r/childfree people are worth less?
/r/MensRights22/04/22 04:24 PM
1

Actually, knowing nothing about Australia specifically, census-like measures are usually pretty good and handling stuff like people without normal addresses.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/22 12:05 PM
2

There are different levels of homelessness statistics. Rough sleeper statistics are mostly male, whereas statistics that include living at a friend or family member's house due to not having your own is generally ~60% or lower. There are Australia statistics that are more gendered than 58%. Your first link actually kinda tries to hide this by showing right up front the different levels, but not the gender breakdown within each level.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/22 11:31 AM
3

Just knowing which links are dead is actually by itself quite helpful. Here's a link to the archive of that ugly url shortener. Also, those male homelessness percentages are definitely higher than what I've come across when looking into it myself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/22 11:17 PM
2

The Canada subreddit vacillates between political spectrums. However, woke folks decided it was a hate sub and moved to CanadaPolitics and OnGuardForThee. I'm pretty sure it wasn't a moderation thing since half the mod list has been there for three years or more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/22 10:07 AM
3

Social: Men's actions much more likely to be considered abusive (link). Precarious manhood. Men seen as acceptable targets due to their issues being ostensibly caused by groups of people who happen to also be men. Reproductive Rights: Forced into fatherhood due to birth control failure or fraud. Forced into fatherhood due to outright fabrications. Paternity testing illegal in France, often of minimal use in other countries even against fabrications. Once the state decides a man is a father figur…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/22 10:32 PM
25

Using an archive link here as the nuclear version of np.reddit
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/22 12:59 AM
21

Verbal pressure, coercion, or force? Those categories sound like a push-poll.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 12:36 PM
3

'What do you mean, Blauwpetje, this is a textbook example of consent!' This is odd, because it would seem to have been precisely the absence of affirmative consent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/22 08:46 AM
1

Well it certainly is a televised war, but I thought we kinda had that with Iraq and Gaza. Nonetheless it is certainly more so for this one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/22 12:26 AM
2

I didn't expect to see this kind of war happen in my lifetime. Born yesterday? It isn't like there hasn't been one-sided invasions in Yemen, Armenia, Iraq, Lybia, Gaza, etc. And that's not including less clear ones that involve less air power like Turkey-Kurdistan which has over 5k dead, Syria, Mali, central Africa, etc. Unless by "this kind of war" you mean a war that the US doesn't like.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/22 08:29 AM
1

Government response to Domestic Violence. Feminists are so clearly lying about it, the MRM has some major wins in this regard with VAWA being constantly revised to make it more gender neutral (even though it was claimed to be gender neutral in its first revision), the helpseeking experiences study, laws that are absurdly gendered, 498A, UK legal aid dependant on false DV accusations, there is simply so much material on this subject that is so surprising to people who haven't heard of any of it a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 07:43 PM
1

In his defense of circumcision didn't he say in basically the same breath that "History will prove [intactivists] even more correct."?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 02:16 AM
15

This is quite impressive, much better than I thought it might go given the title. I would even go so far as to suggest this is may be one of the videos to refer reluctant people to when trying to explain the need for empathy for the outcast as it relates to incels.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/22 05:29 AM
2

So what's the statistical difference between 0 and 1 prior partner? I feel these statistics are perhaps burying some things.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 07:51 PM
2

It's true, but he does talk about it all the time. I also think that if he was prompted concerning domestic violence or MeToo or family court he'd give a pretty MRA answer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 06:23 PM
1

If you don't think Akkad is anti-feminist the past six months you haven't looked through his video titles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/22 05:48 AM
1

There’s this myth that drug offenders get 20 years. To clarify, they can and do, but that's a result of the sentencing part of the justice system being a crapshoot in general rather than a policy of being tough on drugs in particular. Sentencing being a crapshoot (in many jurisdictions) without a clear grounding in fact caused a lot more problems pre-2003 in the US when sentencing guideline departures became easier to overturn due to the PROTECT act. Once the sentencing guidelines provision of t…
/r/MensRights16/02/22 07:19 PM
1

I thought god gave up on that after the flood. But he did give us the rainbow as an apology. :-) Nono, the rainbow only signifies that he stopped destroying the world with water, which is why the next destruction of the world is going to be of a hotter, spicier variety. Even if it does it still requires that the two act as a married couple You'd be surprised. Canada is very expansive about its common-law marriage.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 03:17 AM
1

Why not rather suffer wrong? Why not rather be defrauded? Really? It's really in the Bible, yes. The idea here is that God will do justice to the matter (firstly in a "love your enemies", "pay it forward" sense, but also in a "Vengeance is the Lord's I will repay, says the Lord of Hosts", parable-of-Lazarus sense). Particularly in that time people taking each other over not large amounts to a rather byzantine (in this case somewhat literally) court system with severe punishments that could well …
/r/MensRights16/02/22 02:43 AM
1

That could indeed be difficult, however the reasons for it being difficult are actually somewhat limited. 1 Corinthians 6 says concerning lawsuits: When one of you has a grievance against another, does he dare go to law before the unrighteous instead of the saints? Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this l…
/r/MensRights15/02/22 04:57 PM
3

I'm not sure about other places, but in CA you'll need a county marriage license for the church to do the marriage. This makes it easier for kiddo's suggestion to work rather than harder, the church cannot "legally" marry you, so instead you get ecclesially married only. The laws that prevent this are called "common law marriage".
/r/MensRights15/02/22 03:53 PM
1

I take it you've already found this, yeah?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/22 12:47 PM
2

Yep, that's my story and I'm sticking to it, with regard to this issue Peterson was correct for the reasons you summarized. I suppose I should also note that much of the application of this law is going to be how HR departments view firing decisions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/22 06:20 PM
4

I see nothing here to suggest this is even remotely true. “Bill C-16 amends the Canadian Human Rights Act as well as the Criminal Code (Canadian Human Rights Act, R.S.C. (1985), ch. H-6; Criminal Code, R.S.C. (1985), c. C-46 (both JUSTICE LAWS WEBSITE.) The Canadian Human Rights Act “prohibits discrimination by federally regulated employers or service providers, including federal departments, agencies and Crown corporations, First Nations governments and private, federally regulated companies, s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/22 05:54 PM
0

What I mean by BC is that c-16 was for federally regulated bodies. I see nothing here to suggest this is even remotely true. Not here either. What are you talking about? ...the real issue is this being handled by an HRT? Meaning if it was handled as actual normal labor law ( don’t call your employees sweetie) that would be ok? Indeed, if it was handled as a labour law that would be quite different as that wouldn't apply to a person sitting at a bar, and wouldn't even immediately apply to a co-wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/22 04:57 PM
3

Well look, I am listening. First that is BC in a restaurant. Not Ontario in a public institution If it didn't happen in Toronto it didn't happen? I'm confused. This is an act of parliament, not legislature. Second, and much more importantly, the article states that the charge is deliberately and repeatedly misgendering That was a matter of failing to accomodate. It is not a "charge" of any kind, because an HRT handled it. it is consistent with other standards No it isn't. "can resign over" is a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/22 03:59 PM
5

The enactment also amends the Criminal Code to extend the protection against hate propaganda set out in that Act to any section of the public that is distinguished by gender identity or expression I don't think there are many people here who are unfamiliar what constitutes "hate propaganda" in intersectional feminist theory. and to have their needs accommodated, consistent with their duties and obligations as members of society, without being hindered in or prevented from doing so by discriminat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/22 01:50 PM
40

If the boys are not all right, they only have themselves to blame. They made this society, crafted and shaped it to suit them and them alone. All those young pre-adolescent boys with the power to create US law...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/22 10:22 AM
2

I mean if God tells you to hurt a baby, you get a knife and start cutting. What I don't understand is cultural circumcision and the UN circumcision campaign that uses COVID-mandate style rhetoric to horrific result.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/22 08:49 AM
1

Are cynics more likely to be correct than optimists? Being negative from a position of ignorance may well be rational -- if less motivating. This goes doubly for the products of institutions with a poor track record like the BBC.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/22 10:59 AM
1

Back then, we didn't have women divorce-raping men as much. Source or it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 03:09 PM
2

Both "Irreconcilable differences" and "living apart" are the very definition of no-fault. Not sure about 'alienation of affection'.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 02:15 AM
4

No fault divorce does make it easier to get a financially and socially ruinous divorce, but looking at the era before divorce was so easy shows that not being able to get a divorce was also exceedingly financially ruinous as both spouses have claim to the marital assets. I'm not sure how no-fault divorce came to be, but IIRC it was also important for husbands when it happened, since they were "only" liable for alimony after a divorce, and not for arbitrary expenses.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 02:13 AM
2

So I put together a bit of a deeper look at conviction rates, and was all set to argue that a conviction rate of 72% is indeed low. But then I had to remove all of that, because it turns out that the 72% condemnation rate isn't convictions based on prosecution, but rather something purely for cases that have a trial. It isn't a look at cases prosecuted vs dropped like the US or Commonwealth countries might calculate. If it turns out that 72% includes guilty pleas and confessions then it's an abs…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/22 01:14 AM
2

Oh goodness, I need that subreddit. I also need more examples posted to that subreddit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/22 12:03 PM
1

I knew there was something about Spain that was awful, but I definitely forgot what it was. Thanks for looking into this. From what I could gather (I don't speak Spanish) Spain has since 2004 special "courts for violence against women (in the broadest sence of the term), able to rule on criminal, civil and family matters. The very first item is having family court and criminal court mixed together. This should be good. they have to set up a case in 72 h after the complaint, and have 2 weeks (2 w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/22 11:59 AM
1

List three men's issues for me and I'll tell you why feminism is a bad thing.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 11:52 AM
1

Nope, even though "men have it way easier" is wrong and has been wrong that statement is still a distraction. Injustice is injustice and that phrase is just a way to ignore injustice because it isn't what a feminist would address. Beyond that, talking to feminist women that know you IRL about how the victim identity cult is wrong is socially dangerous. Even though the worst of that danger is mostly limited to co-workers, I would be very careful about linking my IRL identity to this in the presen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/22 07:57 AM
9

So this study is relying on row 3 and 6 in order to draw these conclusions, and what they essentially represent is: Of the ENTIRE samples of men and women - not of those who reported perpetration, mind you - 2.6% of men and 3.3% of women over-reported perpetration. And of the ENTIRE samples of men and women - not of those who reported victimisation - 8.3% of men and 3.1% of women over-reported victimisation. Oh shit, I missed this entirely. WTF. Yet another study on the pile of deliberately fals…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/22 03:30 AM
1

Assuming that story isn't the gender reversal that it reads like seems a bit silly to me. As does calling anything remotely related to this a thing that a person "survived". But even if that story was to be taken unironically: He wasn't a victim, he volunteered. And in this case that phrase counts even more than it usually does, since this isn't as far removed from the man's action as alimony usually is. The men's movement isn't masculinism. The response to shitty situations needs to be mitigati…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 02:23 PM
2

I'd agree that it's another failed branding issue by the left. It isn't though. Like "abolish the police" it means exactly what it says until some liberals pull a boo-urns. Leftist struggle can at times vacillate from endless division between almost-identical groups to mainstreaming together truly strange bedfellows. This is fairly normal and part of the process of seeking radical change -- but it's crazy to believe either extreme is what it claims to be. I'd agree that on paper, very few women …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 01:33 PM
4

I've almost never seen an anti-women comment on here. /r/leftwingmaleadvocates has a pretty no-nonsense mod policy about generalizations that functions very well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 01:29 PM
3

Excellent read. Don't forget also that the criminal laws are different for men and women. For instance, Montana's law for domestic violence (amoung a few other state laws), India's laws for rape (amoung other countries), US's law for the draft (amoung other countries), infanticide laws, and possibly much more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/22 03:50 AM
2

The reason I'm skeptical about this sub is because I see a lot of criticism against feminists I feel is unwarranted. It isn't. Don't get me wrong, there are a handful of uptight authoritarian "feminists" out there who may seek to criminalize catcalling on the street, have more "women only" spaces, and morally condemn video games that sexualize women. I mean, this list says you aren't blind to certain excesses. However, given the ubiquity of products that use the latest greatest feminist lingo in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 01:32 PM
1

Good point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/22 07:21 AM
1

The brief answer to this accusation is that no one knows for sure which sex kills the other more. Indeed, after reading the statistics from my source alone I did realize this. The first mostly-female method is poisoning. The second is the wife hiring a professional killer, The third is the wife persuading a boyfriend to do the killing." "These last two methods, if discovered, are never listed by the FBI as a woman killing a man. They are listed, rather, as “multiple-offender" killings. We only k…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/22 06:26 AM
3

Read the Declaration of Sentiments and tell me how that doesn't describe patriarchy theory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 09:40 AM
6

The reason for that, however, comes down to the fact that men are, in absolute terms, victimized at higher rates than women. This is not the case, however, when it comes to domestic homicide. Expressing the result as a percentage of homicides does result in some wonderfully misleading graphs which is par for the course for feminist misinformation, but in this particular case there is still a substantially greater amount of known domestic homicides with female victims than male victims. I would l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 02:31 AM
13

The numbers aren't absolute due to the the number being an extrapolation from only those cases where the relationship between the victim and offender are known. But yeah, women are more likely to be killed by their spouse, ex-spouse, or boyfriend/girlfriend than men are in an absolute sense (and not merely in the sense that a greater proportion of female homicide victims are initimate relationship related), and this can be confirmed from other sources (link). Calling this femicide is essentially…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 01:26 AM
1

So it's about suggestions and microagressions? You do good work, but this is cutting it a bit fine I think. "Committed" does absolutely have that connotation, but the word involved isn't what needs fixed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/22 09:27 AM
1

I think that's a fairly pointless exercise since it isn't exactly hard to export and/or fork if someone wants to and I think most projects to do so would at least be substantially merged back in. I think it'd just be bloat and make-work (in fact, /r/mensrights used to have a copy of rbomi on its own wiki and now does not). MRA wiki-projects of the past have mostly been a failure due to not having enough eyes to sustain the creation->revision->merging/deletion/upgrade cycle that most wikis go thr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/22 04:08 AM
1

Ah, sadly I wouldn't know, since I'm only on reddit and not on discord. The RBOMI subreddit isn't really in active development at the moment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/22 01:13 AM
1

If you want to submit an update for a section: pm it to me or otherwise pm it to the subreddit (doing this would pm it to Oncefa2 and I). Better?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/22 06:42 PM
22

I have a problem with Patriarchy theory. Precisely this. Unfortunately feminism is patriarchy theory to a large extent. Patriarchy theory goes back to the Seneca Falls Convention. However any feminism that rejects patriarchy is a feminism that I can likely work together with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/22 03:29 AM
1

AFAIK this wouldn't be typical dowry because the gifts involved don't remain the in some fashion property of the groom. This is would be more typical of bride-price. While in some cultures dowry actually does become property of the groom rather than remaining the property of the bride, my understanding is that this less common and that the more common practice is that dowry remains property of the bride even if only in name. Bride-price and dowry aren't really reverses of each other, and this so…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/21 02:37 PM
3

Generally RBOMI will look directly at the source studies or individual claims written in books that could be from a study. It also tries to be rather strict about being demonstrable so rather than say something nebulous like "men recieve less empathy" which is hard to show in all situations in its totality, it will say things like studied bias in relationship contexts and permissive attitudes to violence against men. The exception is "male disposability", which has a more extensive section. So c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/21 01:57 AM
6

This contains some well-told anecdotes and is a good writeup on the need for a deliberate truth-seeking approach to accusations of crime. Here is an old post I made with links to exploratory studies on the topic focusing more on the actual breakdown of false sexual assault accusations in data (DV accusations are slightly different, and more common).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/21 11:38 PM
1

Granted, if you are unconcerned with finances and are free of relationships that could go south and don't want kids a lot of the factors that go into the quality of life of the average male are irrelevant (particularly economic opportunities, which may be the issue with Belarus). In that case the main qualities that one is looking for in a country are probably justice system (false allegations), local culture preferences, and crime rate -- perhaps paternity fraud depending on how you want to liv…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 08:33 PM
1

No, not remotely. A ratio of 3:1 is normal. A ratio of 5:1 is Russia-tier. Something is decidedly encouraging men to off themselves in iceland that doesn't apply to the general population. In fact, the absolute male suicide rate in Iceland is pretty extremely bad if you limit to Europe (Middle Eastern countries in particular may artificially deflate their suicide statistics and I'm not sure of the reliability of African ones).
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:16 PM
1

It most certainly does not from a suicide ratio perspective.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 05:09 PM
2

Looking at suicide statistics from OECD and WHO, definitely Switzerland, Netherlands, Denmark, Luxembourg. Switzerland has a draft, but looking at these stats I wonder if that doesn't aid in promoting a somewhat healthier culture of male socialization, and that country does well even compared to Netherlands and (slightly) Denmark when it comes to the 30-49 age male suicide rate according to WHO data. UK and Canada have serious issues, but aren't as bad as all that -- in fact, I'd rate them well …
/r/MensRights05/12/21 04:47 AM
2

The only thing that you might accuse her of is that she wasn’t able to tell one black man apart from another and that is neither a crime nor a lie. It is both when you testify that you recognize someone. This specific method of hair analysis was later discredited It's worse than that. Hair analysis cannot possibly identify a person uniquely. We're talking about picking a person out of a group of 100k people or so. It is only possible to use hair analysis to add weight to someone's testimony and …
/r/MensRights05/12/21 02:56 AM
5

So we leave out that she was told that forensic evidence tied him to her rape The "forensic evidence" was the main reason for his conviction. Forensic evidence was a hair analysis. You could match that to 3M people in the US even if it were done properly, and with the lab's technique, possibly 15M people. The sort of forensic analysis done was not the sort of analysis that could ever have possibly uniquely identified a person in the best of cases, all it could have done (if done properly, which …
/r/MensRights05/12/21 02:45 AM
1

Absolutely, but even if one would personally rather be a part of this world, it's quite another sort of thing to make that decision for someone else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/21 01:26 AM
2

Having children in this generation, regardless of gender, is an especially obvious moral hazard. Certainly the social environment may be especially nasty for boys, but looking at the suicide rates I don't think it was especially better to be born into being drafted to fight in vietnam or otherwise be thrown into the many other horrors of the past. Discrimination often doesn't show up in life achievement metrics, because although discrimination can destroy individuals, having to work harder than …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/21 11:06 AM
2

You may be surprised if you give them an honest good-faith chance. Indeed, haha.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 07:18 PM
1

This will probably get me banned Nah, menslib might ban you for saying something that isn't on-message, but that's not done here.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 07:42 AM
-1

There's literally no reason to try this hard to disprove the psychology of being transgender without some sort of irrational hatred or fear of it. It couldn't possibly be that trans-psychiatry is killing kids, for instance? Irrational my ass. Granted, that's separate from the idea of people being the gender they are because they are percieved that way (or even merely identify that way, regardless of how they are percieved), but right here you're pulling the "they just hate us for our freedoms" s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/21 01:04 AM
20

I found this on mensrights and thought it was a good read describing the shenanigans of radical feminists co-opting an attempt to make a dent in the horrible culture of hollywood. By demonizing men and unjustly destroying some men's lives in the process.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/21 09:46 PM
5

An excellent article. The overall point of the "gender church" side of feminism taking over the movement using MeToo is, I think quite correct. It perhaps it a bit too deferential to feminism in places -- after all the same defining humans as poison because all women are victimized by all men features prominently in early feminist writings like the Declaration of Sentiments (and the violence features prominently in the UK suffragette movement). However, as I said, this was a great read and well …
/r/MensRights27/10/21 05:31 AM
3

Hermsman vs Seyer and similar cases VAWA Mandatory DV Arrest Policies (see Montana for an example) Gendered disaster relief and war response, especially when facing groups like the Boko Haram which target boys specifically. Police and Judicial training programs University "courts" Family Court UN circumcision campaigns (these campaigns have a lot of urgency to them not unlike the present COVID measures, and result in circumcision being done forcibly -- though the UN campaigns do not call for a f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/21 12:15 AM
3

Sometimes having an argument isn't about winning. On the other hand, how could taking that post and calling it an "agenda of ignoring women and their possible issues" be about anything more than winning an argument?
/r/MensRights26/10/21 10:32 PM
3

Business are doing dumb things like this all the time though. Why are so many companies located in Toronto where office space is expensive and wages are higher? Why doesn't the trucking industry seem to want to maintain a labour base? Surely that will bite them hard in a decade or so.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 10:21 PM
10

Yes, recording may protect you. It could also put you in jail. I'd rather be in jail because I inappropriately recorded something than have my close friends think I'm a rapist. Illegal or not, record.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 01:25 PM
6

The dating cesspool truly is unusually terrible right now, goodness. Nonetheless, one could say "because of this curse I can never truly be happy" about many different positions in life. If I was born taller, or to a wealthier family...But there are many people who would claim a high level of a happiness who are considerably objectively worse off than either of us. Looking at the industrial revolution really gives a picture of how much worse the difficulties and unfulfilled desires of life could…
/r/MensRights17/10/21 09:43 AM
1

Keeping in theme with my general vendetta against the term gaslighting, instead then what I recommend is "invalidating my experience". Of course, I also dislike that phrase because the context of that phrase is commonly in areas wherein discussions of personal experience are essentially useless -- like this one (and essentially any discussion involving gender issues to boot). To say that someone is "disadvantaged" is to make a quite objective and non-anecdotal claim. There is no way in which it …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/21 02:30 AM
1

Granted, but lets say somebody is simply trying to make "the big lie" stick, and isn't particularly concerned with getting you to doubt your own experience -- is there something different you would do? I'm not sure this "gaslighting" has unique defining features here that tells me anything particular about the wrongness of the argument. Rather calling something gaslighting seems to be all about mind-reading, which is a bit of an arcane art. On the other hand I could call the failure of the "equa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/21 12:37 AM
1

Then how does identifying this tactic (as opposed to any other tactic in use in this statement) help deconstruct the argument?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 10:00 PM
1

But the wording of this objection isn't merely a tactic. Sophistry is also natural result of people not thinking logically after all. And it isn't that what we are describing here is something that is right but nonetheless dishonest. Rather, the dishonesty here comes forth from the wrongness of the argument -- if this particular argument were right, reality would reflect equality, not disadvantage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 09:38 PM
1

Certainly. I think that "gaslighting" is part of that sophistry because it is usefully conversation-ending without elucidating the deficiency of the rhetoric. It states that something is wrong and dishonest, and generally lends itself to refusing to explain why it is wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 08:48 PM
1

"literal gaslighting" and "crazy" Okay, I walked right into that one, lol. Idiocy does not ascribe intent I think a lot of the people using the phrase "when you're used to privilege..." are parroting a cult mantra. They aren't intending to make people doubt themselves, they actually believe that BS. And if the ways in which men were disadvantaged were in fact equality, then men wouldn't be disadvantaged in those ways, so not sure it is an accusation of being crazy and therefore wrong more than s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 08:14 PM
1

What would it remove?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 07:56 PM
1

It isn't a matter of using the term correctly, it's a matter of adding to the discussion. If I replaced "literal gaslighting" with "idiocy" and "crazy" with "wrong", would I remove anything useful from your post?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 07:49 PM
2

I do have a general vendetta against the term, precisely because of how it is used with respect to the gender issue discussion. In truth, its a bit of a larger discussion, the in-fashion of fallacy to namedrop used to be "strawmanning". But now it's "gaslighting". All the term really does is serve as a bald assertion that the other person is wrong. It is a tool for trying to get others not to listen to someone, but not a tool for deconstructing an incoming argument. This can be used for cult-lik…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 06:47 PM
0

They said "gaslighting" isn't the appropriate term in this case. I'm saying "gaslighting" is never the appropriate term.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 04:18 AM
1

Gaslighting is a snarl word, say what you mean.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 03:36 AM
1

"Right, that's a product of patriarchy which we want to take down" Ngl, I don't really have a good counter that I like for this one yet. Its a product of the "patriarchy" that feminist organizations enforce. The feminist interloctuor themselves are the patriarchy. It is feminist organizations, parliaments, and legislatures responsible for creating and/or perpetuating Domestic Violence law, family court practices, suicide response, UN actions, and even hyperstoicism to an extent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 05:15 AM
8

Strictly speaking, sexism, but boy oh boy is it low hanging fruit.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 06:47 PM
2

Malthusians were hoping for humanity to live on, but was doomed. Antinatalists are hoping for humanity to die out, but sadly have no belief that humanity actually will die out in the near future. One sentient being on Earth is one tragedy too many.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:43 AM
5

"financial abortion" is an absolute dereliction of the responsibility a man takes on when he consents to sex...this will be the one and only thread where this will be countenanced as a legitimate proposal I respect pro-life positions, but this is pretty extreme.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/21 02:09 AM
1

"I wish you could understand where I'm coming from, I you could understand what that's like, even a little bit, just 1%, but you don't understand so I feel alone talking to you about it" I mean, she could've said this about anything that you have experience with and it would be a giant red flag.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 08:13 PM
2

Nope but if Montana law isn't designed to result in that outcome, I don't know what else it could be trying to achieve.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 04:07 AM
1

I mean, yeah, much of the practice of modern feminism is internally inconsistent. Sure, some of the ideas of modern feminism are internally inconsistent. But there is something more important when it comes to opposing feminism. It's that feminism is materially destructive. Feminist psychology (most of psychology practice) is materially destructive. Feminist policy is materially destructive. Flordia would have a shared parenting presumption if it wasn't for intervention of the largest feminist or…
/r/MensRights19/09/21 07:34 PM
2

One could focus on the ways people's struggles are alike and compatible "men's rights are human rights", or one could focus on the ways people are zero-sum and incompatible "autist racialized men are not able to compete politically or sexually for basic needs". It is a matter of seeking solidarity together ("Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of God’s children.") or solely seeking solidarity with ("he for she"). Intersectionalism likes to present itself as an acknowledgement of co…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/21 04:19 PM
1

Regardless of political spectrum, there is one simple (if not entirely easy) and superior piece of dating advice: don't. GYOW.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/21 07:45 PM
25

There's a difference between the catastrophe that a women's strike would be and the catastrophe that a men's strike would be. It's an entirely different level.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/21 03:04 AM
1

He simply replied yes to an opposition lawyer’s ambiguous statement about ludes for sex, which might well mean a consensual exchange. That the accuser had sex with him while high got close enough to convict, sadly. IIRC the jury made multiple questionable decisions after that, but the actual conviction could have been defended almost entirely on not obtaining consent before obtaining consent for the pills. Much of Weinstein’s activity consisted of consensual sex in exchange for career advancemen…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 08:13 PM
1

Insisting upon independent witnesses would have us defending the likes of Cosby, Weinstein, Sandusky, Epstein, etc. Not for Cosby, he was convicted on his own testimony. Improperly in another way, but nonetheless. Same with Weinstein IIRC. Epstein was definitely convicted on forensic evidence and not mainly on testimony. Sandusky it isn't clear to me.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 07:00 PM
1

I prefer the saidit interface, but it seems ruqqus is where people are going to.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 02:05 AM
3

Witnesses that compare notes in order to avoid contradicting each other and work towards a particular court outcome. Witnesses that are family of each other, for instance are always going to be suspected of this, and for good reason. The Ghomeshi case is an example of collaborating witnesses giving testimony about different events. The apocryphal story of Susanna is an early recording of witness collaboration and how cross examination was used to foil it.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 07:15 PM
2

Testimony from multiple witnesses is very much reliable Only from independent witnesses about the same event. Collaborating witnesses don't count. Witnesses about different events don't count.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 10:56 AM
2

AFAIK, it is theorized that about 5% more boys are born than girls as a result of largely biological causes. The idea appears to be that the greater male mortality rate will result in a rough gender balance later in life.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 05:01 AM
0

In insinuating that if they are wanting this companionship they need to do it in a healthy way. As great as women can be, seeking women as romantic partners is more likely than not a losing strategy for healthy companionship.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 09:37 PM
3

We need to raise the next generation of men to be more independent and to seek companionship with women who actually challenge them to be men, not sex workers. That's how we got here. Teaching men that their relationships with women are essential to their lives is not healthy. Firstly some of the opposite sex is assuredly going to be unavailable for a healthy relationship so not everyone can pair up well (in fact, I consider this to be an argument for MGTOW in and of itself). But also relationsh…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 06:12 PM
3

In Sweden 14 persons died in workplace related accidents. I'm alright with this. Actually, this is ideal, even. As long as it didn't say "including one woman", which would actually make persons a code word.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 08:08 PM
2

It's almost like phrenology doesn't work.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:36 AM
2

I've heard enough stories of men learning the hard way that they need to be more careful about their drinks that I think this is a practice that should be be universalized rather than frowned upon. Even if it isn't though, I find this argument disturbing. Is locking your front door treating all people like burglars? Is internet privacy unimportant because you have nothing to hide?
/r/MensRights27/07/21 12:05 AM
2

The 1.241x earnings gap is provoking too, if you don't think about it much, but that kind of argumentation will never be able to strongly demonstrate anything It sounds like you're saying you don't believe any statistics or math because once someone lied to you about statistics Many statistics are just fine. However, the finding of a disparity of outcome will not lend itself to arguing for a disparity of opportunity no matter how much it may be convenient for some if that were the case. Human so…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 07:14 PM
1

I know that this comment is a bit old but can you help me understand how it is not toxic masculinty that is causing these suicides. Or at least a significant factor in it. Why isn't the weasel term a good term for describing men's issues? Because it's a weasel term. Ignoring that, however. when a man cannot show emotion due to having to put a front of a strong person otherwise being seen as emotional and weak by society. Certainly this is a factor, but "being seen as weak" is a somewhat euphemis…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 06:49 PM
2

Well it said it counted individuals. Orly? According to the university's records, in that year black male students were accused of 50 percent of the sexual violations reported Violations reported, not students. It's highly unlikely the same individual would go through the process twice. To the contrary. In the case of false accusations, dogpiling is common as is indisputably the case in the Kavanaugh case. This would put single individuals through multiple reports of different events. This would…
/r/MensRights26/07/21 08:40 AM
9

This math makes no sense whatsoever. No part of this math makes sense except the 22.8. And assuming hypothetical numbers like this is largely an obvious strategy to hide a logical leap (intentional or otherwise). More importantly, however, the data doesn't have an n-count. 50% of how many? If the number is four that year, it actually doesn't suggest any sort of bias. If there were 9 white balls and a red ball in a hat, and you happen to pick out the red ball, it doesn't mean the bag is biased to…
/r/MensRights25/07/21 01:29 AM
4

Regardless of the result, I don't think there is really an excuse for conflict of interest in court. Family court is corrupt enough as it is.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:03 AM
6

Relax, there is no concept of allyship here so you can provide valuable input regardless of gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/21 08:58 AM
3

So is ADHD over/under/misdiagnosed? Yes probably, but so are ALL other psychiatric disorders. I don't know why people always pick out ADHD for it. ADHD diagnosis by country. Diagnosis for this condition is political as hell. There are lots of psychiatric disorders that are overdiagnosed, but there are a only a few conditions like ADHD and Oppositional Defiance Disorder, the diagnosis of which depends more on the authority doing the diagnosis than the condition of the "patient".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/21 09:21 PM
3

I don't think people tend to be that similar people who have similar political beliefs but don't share a lifestyle or culture. Political beliefs often tend toward a reflection of what would benefit the speaker most, and it is not at all uncommon for mutual benefit to make strange bedfellows. But I'm not sure how many political beliefs are actually in common amoung either the left or the right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/21 11:10 PM
39

How on earth do views on the nature of money have anything to do with trans activists? What does prison reform have to do with mayors that order police to not enforce the law by political affiliation? What does environmental sustainability have to do with political correctness? Beliefs should be based on the merits of their argument, not on association with people who also have other unrelated arguments that happen to be bad. Similarly, "I want to hang around people who don't hate me for how I w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/21 10:29 PM
4

I've developed a social hypothesis that most people feel a natural need to treat a particular group as an "other" to feel superior to and dehumanize. I also believe this, and think that people tend to do this to non-normal behaviour in general. Feminism seems to like to blame opposition to the lifestyles of certain women as misogyny, but othering based on benign nonstandard behaviors is widespread. It can be seen in people's responses to childfree lifestyles, male childcaring, geekdom before tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/21 10:08 PM
12

People’s dismissals of feminism are rooted in the dismissal of women and ideas brought to the table by women more broadly. Riiiiiight, you can only be critical of the USSR if you are an anti-communist, and an enemy of the people. I've heard this one before. One would think that people who have been leftists for so long would be able to recognize this sort of tactic as a red flag.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/21 06:54 PM
2

I'm also interested in how much men's mental health problems are correlated with their parents having divorced before age 16.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/21 01:39 AM
2

It's worse when you read the URL of their official website, without any space or capitalization between "UN" and "women" it makes them sound like a vampire org.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 04:54 AM
35

This is like the third famous instance of this that I've seen, the first being Hermesmann vs Seyer in 1992.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 09:03 PM
6

Motivated feminist students and administrators can stir real trouble, and Germany doesn't seem like it is a bastion of sanity when it comes to feminism. It doesn't appear at least in any English articles to be particularly nasty when it comes to university expulsions at least, so that at least seems better than Canada and the US. In general, being an undergraduate at a university is the opposite of a place of security and power, and may not be a good time to take risks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/21 06:36 PM
2

Germany? I wouldn't get involved in this as a student, and particularly not wish to present before "equality & diversity" professional feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/21 02:59 PM
0

Am I in the feminism subreddit or y'all have serious reading comprehension issues with that last sentence? Yep, people think that you're saying the opposite of what you're saying somehow.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 12:21 AM
18

She has no excuse for keeping it in for that long but it's probably been painful for her as it was for him. Of course a troll feminist could say something like this. Yikes.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 11:35 PM
3

Sadly, putative registries don't result in any visitation rights by itself, and basically only work to prevent adoption. To add to that am unsure if it works to prevent adoption via anonymous maternal surrender, as that apparatus may simply lack enough information concerning the child. And that benefit is achieved at the cost of being a child support source -- possibly automatically and against the will of the mother and without proof of actual paternity. Given the difficulty of obtaining any ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/21 10:56 AM
4

Why do blackouts get more acknowledgement than yearly uptime?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/21 11:48 PM
5

The truth is, men were victimized throughout history and women are to blame. Uh, what exactly makes women -- not just individual women but women in general -- to blame for war, famine, or disease and throughout history at that?
/r/MensRights14/07/21 08:28 PM
6

professional Salem historian here..the Puritans were literally an extremist religious sect akin to something like the Taliban of Christianity. So, not a scholar, then. Got it.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 07:39 AM
3

Hrm, I think I'm going to have to write an essay for myself at some point on why shaming is a good practice, and why it can also be a particularly evil practice. I think it is simply the case that chastity does increase a person's value (to others) when choosing life partners and raising children. Of course I think it is valuable to children in particular, but also to men and women, and with the present issues of family court finding a chaste partner is of greater value to the former. Chastity m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/21 12:27 AM
7

They had fun and left me with the responsbility. This is a concerning take. Children are important in themselves, and if children are to be desired certainly they aren't to be desired for their genetic makeup, right? Granted this is an entirely theoretical line of discussion, as I'm not sure Canada is likely to allow a single male to adopt under normal circumstances.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/21 12:12 AM
4

Not at all. Rather, hasn't it been demonstrated that there are much more stable relationships between people who practice this way of looking at sex? Now, that may simply be due to practising commitment rather than practising chastity per se, but everything I've seen suggests that chastity is not a destructive behaviour, and that its opposite is destructive behaviour. So the question should not be whether this is a toxic way of looking at sex, but rather which practices that come from this way o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/21 12:09 AM
3

Fair
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/21 12:01 AM
3

Is there a need for me to go and see a lawyer? You have a legal question worth 100k+? Yes? Go see a lawyer. Obviously, do not go see a lawyer until you have a list of specific questions as they tend to get paid by the hour. I get the sneaking suspicion there are a lot of ways in which disposing of a property in which multiple people have an interest can get complicated. In Canada she being your girlfriend would be a serious danger due to common law marriage.
/r/MensRights12/07/21 06:09 AM
3

Radical feminists represent a small minority I don't believe this, at least depending on what you mean by radical. I would contend that any feminist that uses the term 'patriarchy' is a radfem. And therefore of course, that the radical feminists have become the majority. Radical, firstly of course for opposing the system of governance at what they would claim to be its core, but more so for the collective accusation and blame which that term is almost inevitably the precursor to. The feminism th…
/r/MensRights12/07/21 05:55 AM
1

I suspect that anyone sufficiently well-versed in wikipedia would know that their hierarchy is hopelessly radfem, and not bother with such an effort.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/21 05:42 AM
4

Jackie had badgered me before about entering a relationship, she kept at it for weeks, and I'll be honest it was flattering so I didn't push back too hard. one night Jackie comes over to sleep next to me, and she gets on top of me. I tell her I really don't want to have sex with her, but she's insistent. All I knew was that she had said she was, and that she was in the middle of trying to get the guy sent to jail. In the moment of her touching me, I became filled with fear that she might accuse …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/21 01:28 AM
3

Modern western politics, and to an extent culture, have also become increasingly polarized with an us vs them mentality going on an the middle ground disappearing at an alarming rate. This mirrors feminism a lot, not just in the usually "if you believe in gender equality then you're a feminist" but also in the whole anyone who criticizes feminism for any reason is a misogynist. ...Also the culture of millennials and Gen Z (my generation) This is a very wrong way of thinking, because the problems…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/21 01:13 AM
5

It sounds like a video that allows feminists to take a small step, and even that hardly. It's a substantial step that recognizes some of the basic intellectual dishonesty endemic to the movement and also some of the major men's issues and how ridiculous the feminist approach to them as been to addressing men's issues as a whole. It eschews much of the outright dishonesty that is obviously malign, it just doesn't let go of the bad philosophy and history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 08:51 AM
4

When The History of Woman Suffrage was written, they further preserved their place at the center of the story. Indeed, I've read that it turns out some important claims of that book are subtly or not-so-subtly false. Here is a paper that does a good historical look at some issues surrounding the suffrage movement.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 05:36 AM
4

Yeah, his few insults towards MRAs are annoying, but in his case not really relevant to his views towards men's issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 05:00 AM
3

Thanks for transcribing most of the quote. But you missed the juicy part: "Which is why I am not surprised that many incels and MRAs are of the firm opinion that...gaslighting them and that behind closed doors all feminists are actually buddy-buddy trying to oppress men".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 04:45 AM
2

Almost 13 minutes on the dot for that quote. No, he was not talking about a small subsection.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 03:30 AM
2

I mean, there's pretty very little that you could put after "many MRAs and incels" that wouldn't be an insult to both. I'm not sure he made the sort of negative generalization that would get one's comment removed from here, but I can't imagine that was far off.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 02:54 AM
-1

I mean, if those are the two ways in which feminism has helped women, then feminism hasn't helped women at all. Sexual assault and harassment was probably dealt with more severely prior to feminism. Better to talk about Friedan's accomplishments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 12:48 AM
13

The TL;DW is that in this video he criticizes some feminist responses and accuses them of having impeded progress on men's issues, while affirming their basic ideas (like patriarchy) and insulting MRAs (so as not to be labelled with them). He spends a lot of time redefining terms trying to make "patriarchy hurts men too" not sound as insane as it is. I realize its probably less bad than I make it sound because he does land clearly on some substantial problems with feminism and does talk a bit ab…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 12:33 AM
14

there are a lot of people out there who thing that 'patriarchy' is a way of organizing society where all women are exploited for the benefit of all men. That is incorrect..."In a patriarchal society men are placed hierarchically over women" This guy needs to read some more feminist theory. There are multiple conflicting definitions for the term, and while some definitions for the term are close to the former, essentially none are are as limited as the latter. From the very Declaration of Sentime…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/21 12:30 AM
4

I can't see what he's actually saying being controversial. You might do well to reread the other comments on this thread. His overarching argument is largely about reclaiming feminist ideology, which is fairly horrible and was never going to do well here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/21 11:42 PM
3

If you're trying to tell other people about a user, you shouldn't message them in the process. Also, "sealioning" is a horrible term, you should leave it behind. Finally, stop being surprised that AMR users try to participate here also. Ignore and move on.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 10:14 PM
7

People haven't been prevented from complaining except in family court in some jurisdictions. But people have been wrongfully had their social complaints dismissed on the grounds of their birth. "right to complain" is horrible language that should be discarded.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 11:38 PM
5

Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not a Dan Price apologist. His good work doesn't make me believe he is innocent of the accusations. Never heard of Dan Price until now. His accuser makes me believe he is innocent of the accusation though. “I quit talking because all I could see was cruelty on the other side. Sure, some people could write their own origin myth, but I couldn’t even tell my truth to a small group of people without other people losing their minds.” ["small group of people" refers to a T…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/21 11:24 PM
1

Not in itself. I think that’s mental labor. If there’s some management of anxiety about forgetting something, that’s the emotional-labor part of it. This, like most careful and deliberate effort (I hesitate to say "work") that relates to emotions -- if not essentially all such effort -- involves the lack of emoting.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 06:24 AM
5

reee is a way of making fun of people with ASD that stim. Its onomatopoeia for screeching. Don't make it so specific.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/21 04:24 PM
4

I am an MRA and I am a feminist, except I'm a feminist who actually cares about equality and actually cares about people. I must say that I emphatically disagree with your decision to identify as feminist before the politicians of our day who continue to make deadly legislation concerning and domestic violence and divorce (among other issues). However, if you wish to persist down that path, you may wish to check out "Who Stole Feminism?" by Christina Hoff Sommers, as she seems to have a similar …
/r/MensRights28/06/21 06:14 PM
3

The accused may not be a good speaker, and being arrested is a stressful experience. It would be very easy for an experienced police officer to lead the accused to saying something damning even if they did nothing wrong. Nonetheless, it is a deadly matter that right now it is always a bad idea to talk to police. And I do mean deadly, because it is also a bad idea for witnesses to a crime to talk to police, though thankfully many do. In order to avoid this it would be better to require people to …
/r/MensRights28/06/21 05:51 AM
2

Is that true though? Is dealing with women really the same as putting a loaded weapon to your head and pulling the trigger? It may be the former, but not the latter. And that only in those areas of law where a woman's word is essential to the law, such as state-managed marriage. The problem isn't women, the problem is the law.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 05:26 AM
1

Pretty routine where cohabiting counts as marriage, yes. But not routine outside of a cohabitation relationship. There was that one case in Ontario, but that was a massive exception.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 11:53 PM
8

Some of this stuff is unusual, like paying child support to a statutory rapist. Others, like paying child support for a child that isn't yours -- that's perfectly normal. Its also perfectly normal for most, all, or more than all of the family assets to go to the woman in a messy divorce. Prepare a divorce early.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 10:49 PM
5

This guy seems extremely supportive of MeToo. Lots of talk about how victims should be believed etc. And then there is this gem: "Cancel culture being what it is, the companies can’t fight it either, or else they are attacked, too." Large companies most certainly can fight it, especially video game publishers, Lord knows they can get away with almost anything and they tend not to have a feminist audience. When companies buckle to nuisance behaviour, they get more of it. Standing up to ridiculous…
/r/MensRights27/06/21 05:08 AM
1

There's only more female nudity if you define nudity differently for each gender. Nudity is different for each gender.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 11:22 PM
1

Searching BJP and feminism results in 5+ entries variously accusing BJP of faking being feminist. Make no mistake, BJP routinely implements feminist policy, including shooting down KTS Tulsi's (a member of the opposition) gender neutral sexual assault bill in accordance with the demands of Indian feminists.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 01:02 AM
2

Affirmative action was never a tradcon position. Moreover, government of India can hardly be said to be non-feminist.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:48 AM
3

That pay equity law created by the party presently in power in Canada truly is ridiculously gendered. That law literally is only for women (not even non-men are included).
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:45 AM
3

What extra rights is the gay community asking for? LG is vastly different from BT (+Q2S+alphabetsoup) in this respect. Nonetheless, "right to not be offended" and "right to be accepted" type requirements are still present in part of the LG community.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:40 AM
7

To be honest, Bing probably has the more effective advice in this case.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 10:24 PM
1

Video is region-locked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/21 12:07 AM
0

Relevance? Feminism is relevant, but...is this person?
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:39 PM
1

It should go back to being fully publicly funded, provided there's a standard of proof to recognize the efficacy of the method (it was a good thing we finally got rid of homeopathy refunds, although more should be done on that front) This is part of why I actually kind of like that Canada never got pharmacare. Clinic and Surgeon services, yes. Healthcare everything? No.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/21 11:04 PM
8

I never said a single word about compensation. He derailed my career, then decided I was entitled to nothing...So if one woman gets something that seems unfair, men are soooo mad about it - but the shit women deal with (from men) on a daily basis is fucking nuts. It’s not even close. Yes, you did, right there. And I don't get it. Why would the "shit women deal with (from men) on a daily basis" that you now detail have anything to do with the acceptability of injustice in divorce or asset splitti…
/r/MensRights05/06/21 10:16 PM
5

Do you live under a rock? Women don’t feel safe walking down the street. Ergo...you should be compensated for your mistake of freely giving to a freeloader? I don't get you. But the law gets it wrong once in a while You don't have any clue what the law is, it isn't about what the law gets wrong, it's what the law does on purpose.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 09:17 PM
1

You're right except for healthcare. Healthcare is actually amazing here and Canada is absolutely a model of how to do it.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 08:39 PM
7

Marriage wouldn’t have offered me any respite; he was broke on paper...in California This isn't true, even if the guy is broke on paper and even if the court doesn't figure out his wealth-hiding shenanigans, sadly. The judge must consider "Earning capacity and the standard of living during the marriage or partnership" in California. In other words, yes, alimony would have entitled you to his assets, even if the judge miraculously didn't find where he hid them. This is an entitlement over and abo…
/r/MensRights05/06/21 08:33 PM
1

"Men are Human". Boys may think about what it means to be men -- and by men they tend to mean peers/rivals to their fathers and teachers (which may well mean "typically productive members of society"). However, I don't think men think about being men much. They are concerned with being fathers or workers or soldiers or whatever. If men were that invested in male identity, I think the MRM would have less problems than it does. The question in the mind of a man is usually not "what is being male",…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/21 07:16 PM
8

Democracy Now! gets most of its views on democracynow.org (and audio-only from that and other platforms). It is a well-funded leftist independent news organization and likely compares favourably to TYT if they have 1/5th the subscribers as TYT on a platform they are all-but-nonexistant on. Democracy Now! predates youtube by nearly a decade.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/21 05:31 AM
5

This reduces accidents. Problem is that what you describe is neither an accident nor caused by an individual: the situation where two people have sex and one of them wakes up feeling as though they were taken advantage of.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 10:33 PM
1

Oh weird, I am a year behind on this case.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 11:45 PM
1

"Somebody and ACLU". Yeah, the latter are basically uninvolved in this, but okay.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 02:13 AM
22

The women's increase is within the realm of noise though, and less than 2015 or the years prior.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 05:16 AM
1

It is very true that you'll find lies on those surveys. However, the experimental error in such surveys cannot be worse than the non-experimental nature of failure to prosecute or convict. For instance, false accusations that take the police route are perjury. I sure hope you don't consider perjury convictions to be indicative of the false accusation rate.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 12:47 AM
-6

Well if convictions have fallen that means rapes have fallen The standard for crime victimization statistics are victimization surveys. This is just as true for theft as for any other crime. Such surveys are often run by governments and the US has a really quite huge one they run regularly.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 05:03 AM
1

During the course of the investigation, Stagner continued with her false allegations in an effort to extort money from the victim. Well that's one reason to make a false accusation I guess. But isn't extortion a separate charge and shouldn't that result in more than 21 months? Looking at felonies.org it seems in most places 24 months is the minimum for that sort of thing.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 12:10 AM
3

We're not talking about the feminists today, who we largely agree about. We're talking about the first feminists, aren't we?
/r/MensRights24/05/21 02:44 PM
6

trying to ostracize people simply because they refuse to group a bunch of women together Not only women, there are male feminists too. And the reason for the downvotes is because what you are saying is disinformation -- disinformation that is important to this topic. Feminism has the reigns of power, and has for a long time. That power has been and continues to be used to ruinous effect. Why? Because those feminists who hold the reigns of power believe some really hateful shit and craft their po…
/r/MensRights24/05/21 02:38 PM
5

The first feminists who actually wanted to vote like Emmeline Pankhurst? Or perhaps you mean the ones who wrote the Seneca Falls Convention's resolution? Not exactly chill folks.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 02:32 PM
7

the first feminists weren't toxic man hating... Really?
/r/MensRights24/05/21 02:22 PM
1

1) Family Court (including Paternity issues) I think its really hard to choose any other issue but this as the most important. This is simply too multi-faceted for me to get into depth here, but the number of lives this has claimed and the severe impact this has on children is a massive tragedy. 2) Domestic Violence Response Society actively empowers the abuse of men through both police and court action. The impact on an affected life by particularly bad cases of inaction -- to say nothing of ac…
/r/MensRights23/05/21 03:34 AM
2

I'll tell you. Feminism is a hate movement because it has more sexists (by far) than the general population. The men's rights movement is not a hate movement because it has fewer sexists than the general population. No. If feminism is a hate movement, it is more material than that. And it is. Is the sport of bowling a hate movement?
/r/MensRights12/05/21 03:16 AM
5

She's a Farrell-ite, so she doesn't identify by the term herself for similar reasons.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 06:29 PM
2

The article is paywalled. And I am looking to read for the primary source ideally, not WaPo's journalists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/21 03:05 PM
4

1 in 5? Citation?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/21 02:49 AM
1

There was a post on this sub, cross-posted to MensRights about a men's shelter in Toronto being established. The center has been established for a while, IIRC, but they just now created a place to receive men with their children.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/21 08:22 PM
3

Whenever you take on a label you instantly become answerable to everything that the worst members of that group believe. This is not true, and while some people seem to believe this, I don't think they should be taken seriously. Nonetheless, if you take on a group label, you should be able to know a group leader or two, or at know a thing or two about the concrete actions of the group. A Proud Boy should know about the group's main public actions: participation in counter-protests and protests, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/21 08:05 PM
6

Its too simple a way to describe it, but it could be right about the word 'patriarchy'. The concept of patriarchy however goes back at least to the Seneca Falls convention. A substantial mainstream of feminism has always been about this strange idea of the oppression of women by all (yes, all) men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/21 07:53 PM
3

Right and men's rights is what? I imagine they don't brand themselves as MRAs largely for branding reasons. Whereas Warren Farrell doesn't identify himself with the term, he still answers to it sometimes. For the same reason, they don't usually associate (quite possibly actively don't associate) with MRA folks.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 12:51 AM
2

Neat, which ones? Impressive finding feminists willing to agree on the child support double standard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/21 09:37 PM
2

Did the platform for equality manage to acquire substantial agreement about proposals for improved DV response, divorce/custody, criminal sentencing, paternity issues, or gendered disaster relief?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/21 09:02 PM
4

I don't know that this has been true in my experience. I've found it's possible to have productive conversations about men's issues with feminists by being civil and speaking to their perspective and understanding. It is possible to have conversations with singular people about any topic. The OP is talking about having conversations with many people. The reactions to Cassie Jaye and Lacy Green, and Warren Farrell, and Erin Pizzey, and many, many others make it abundantly clear that it is not pos…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/21 07:11 PM
2

There are plenty of female villains that men overcome, particularly ones that are imprisoned rather than slain. Female villains tend not to be killed by men, however. Redwall's Tsarmina (in the second published of the series, no less), is an example though.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 08:50 PM
2

Getting revenge? Yes. On a woman? Occasionally, but they are usually not the good guy. The dota 2 anime was close to making Invoker a good guy, but then they decided against it, as expected.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 08:35 PM
12

This is pretty brutally evil. You don't know a lot about India but want to have a policy impact there, you're sure that advocacy on behalf of women is important in India (feminist activism in India is a bit different from where you live and includes excluding men from the legal definition of rape for fear of false rape allegations, and worse), and you call people in India based on a US-only racial category as if Indians are a minority in their own country. Take your brain off of the intersection…
/r/MensRights26/04/21 07:32 AM
1

Please, friends, do not fall for nebulous definitions of ideological orthodoxy -- for whom everyone seems to have a different an incompatible definition at that. It would be nice if people would disagree with concrete problems, rather than try to create a negative buzzword to paint folks with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/21 12:11 AM
2

I also feel she fails to address how oppressed minorities have been historically left out of victories achieved by labor Like when? Most of the labor victories I'm aware of were only possible because people worked across social divides, and I'm mostly aware of those cases where they chose to fight and die together rather than split, such as the Eureka Stockade. In the US, for instance, agricultural and domestic work were not included in the original National Labor Relations Act. Are you aware of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/21 06:38 PM
2

You could get your future destroyed if you keep doing what you're doing. Be more careful about who you give attention to.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 02:49 AM
0

Among the devoutly religious of the Abrahamic religions, lifetime celibacy is expected for those who do not wish to marry. For Catholics, marriage is illicit for those who do not wish to have children. There is therefore not the same sort of looking-down-upon for the celibate within these subcultures, though that may well be a result of women being potentially more affected. That isn't to say there isn't substantial social pressure to get married (contrary to the precepts of the religions involv…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/21 04:40 PM
9

A very small minority of those that identify as feminists hate men. A very small minority of those that identify as feminists think "my brother and my son are evil because they are men". A very large majority of feminists believe that domestic violence is about men controlling women, that the phrase "believe women" is equality, and that women "are oppressed" by men collectively. They also believe that that discrimination against men solely because of their circumstances of birth is equality, str…
/r/MensRights17/04/21 06:21 PM
11

Then next time don't claim to know what it's for.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 11:11 PM
14

I have never and will never attack men. Says the person who defended Section 498A and #MeToo.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 10:56 PM
8

I get called a feminist troll, feminazi, and simp quite a bit. You are probably the most inegalitarian person I've ever read on this sub. All of those apply to you.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 10:41 PM
1

Because it is true. When false allegations aren't punished but are made, it demonstrates the reality of a faulty and dangerous system. Further investigation also demonstrates the system's near complete inability to distinguish between a credible and laughable allegation. It is obvious that no one ought to believe accusations of sexual assault in general and that reality empowers people who commit sexual assault. Why don't people talk about the falsely accused as victims? Because feminism suppres…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 03:51 PM
9

but medication doesn't get tested on women as much as men That isn't to say that women aren't as part of the beta testing as much as men, but rather that people don't alpha test medication on women for some reason. This does contribute to some legitimate issues. I think perhaps those are less about testing and more about the assumptions of the industry (as another poster points out, this is less about researchers than doctors). As you note women are not "smaller men" for the purposes of medicine…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 03:42 PM
4

Alright, what kind of critique?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/21 01:48 PM
5

Does "intersectionality" not describe the difference between a bisexual male's experience of and bisexual female's experience of bi-ness -- with a focus on explaning how uniquely female challenges complicate bi-ness?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/21 06:46 AM
11

how bad intersectionality is (because I don’t consider it that bad). Intersectionality allows different movements to influence each other, especially if thier goals are even remotely similar. That happens with marginalized people. Allies with similar goals tend to connect Intersectionalism and solidarity are near opposite concepts. Solidarity is finding common goals to the exclusion of variant ones. Intersectionalism is about empowering people based on birth group and imputing the lived experien…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/21 06:35 AM
3

He also temporarily resigned, a corporate-sounding diversity code of conduct was adopted (previously there was a "code of conflict" that included the forbidding of harassment), and his radical feminist daughter pushed for gender quotas. All of which occurred in a relatively short amount of time. A year later he's been accepted back (one of the relatively few cases where that has ever happened after such a resignation), and re-educated. Ultimately this was much todo about nothing at least on the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/21 06:31 PM
2

I would caution against concluding that 'mothers are more abusive (than fathers, presumably)' if you're basing that solely on the fact that children are more likely to have been abused by a mother than a father. Children are simply around mothers much more than fathers. Wanted to see this in the comments, glad I found it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/21 04:53 AM
20

RMS has been controversial since he was born, haha. It isn't really indicative of the woke rot in the Linux development space. He's been witch-hunted before and will be again, the only difference this time is that there is even less real material for it. If you want to see woke you have to look to what happened to Linus.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/21 03:15 AM
17

His abrasiveness always made him fit to lead that organization, though. His agitation helped make FOSS a thing, I think we can sympathize with that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/21 03:13 AM
2

She mentions that briefly in a lot of interviews (and as one of the important personal takeaways at that!), but understandably doesn't go into a lot of details. Except in this interview, which I fear she might regret if she doesn't already. This other interview also has a moment that I feel is typical of how feminism has conditioned women to think of men (even otherwise trustworthy men) as malicious and dangerous and just generally evil. All of the feminist terminology is the way it is partially…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/21 07:19 PM
4

It isn't worth it. University can be a bit of an unusual culture in the world, so look elsewhere. One thing that has to be remembered is that divorce is extremely, extremely dangerous. Feminism is a truly extra-strength anti-empathy pill and you need empathy in any committed relationship, especially with you being so young. It doesn't matter if they are supposedly good feminists, though there are a reasonable few who are pretty legit. It doesn't matter if they think feminism is for everyone, fem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/21 02:22 PM
1

The UN is behind the circumcision, not UN Women. The UN is behind forcible circumcision. The UN Women is behind promoting circumcision and hiding the realities of genital mutilation. Read this. "1 in 3 women experience violence in their life times". Domestic violence against women and rape is fucking rampant in India. That's not what that said though, that said violence. It is a "global" figure, not an India figure. It includes both intimate partner violence and violence from non partners. WTF a…
/r/MensRights02/04/21 09:25 PM
1

Do you have people who limit their relationships to few months to avoid it? I've read some MGTOW do that, yes. It isn't very many though.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 09:11 PM
13

I just keep deflecting, she's a gender studies minor. Ah, yeah, yeah, that's a good reason to be deflecting, lol.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 04:16 AM
4

But that post isn't relevant. I think I started by saying that he was dying of fentanyl, didn't I?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 03:57 AM
3

Got anything bad to say about UN Women? YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES! Those bastards are responsible for a lot of anti-male policies in the world IIRC. Most notably, however, they are responsible for promoting circumcision and hiding the realities of genital mutilation. The UN Women are repeatedly in this subreddit and /r/mensrights (search link) for their misandric hate. Oh, and you can check their twitter which recently cited the wage gap myth and the faulty women-only equality index and regularly…
/r/MensRights02/04/21 03:56 AM
6

do you know what pressure was applied to Floyd's neck by the knee? Can you quantify it in any way? No one can quantify it, no, and I think most (all?) folks are judging from the videos that have been released, rather than any testimony that could make a stab at quantifying that. However his junior officers tried to convince him to stop. If he had only applied pressure for 30 seconds after he stopped moving, that's one thing, people would criticize that type of hold, and the officer's application…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 03:44 AM
5

Iamtheasshole, apparently. "Once bitten twice shy" is often an expression of weakness. Fear should be based in truth. Being burned a few times can mean that the situation is dangerous and should be avoided, but if the damage is not extreme that fear is usually maladaptive, moreso if there are thousands of benign interactions for every harmful one. If you're going to play tennis, you can't be afraid of the ball (I was going to say soccer, but that can actually be a life-altering injury), nor is g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 01:33 AM
10

Whether Floyd should have died that day, or whether significant force was justified in that incident is one question. Floyd was apparently dying of Fentanyl, and behaving extremely erratically. However, the objection is to the brutality of the manner in which he did die: a police officer kneeling on his neck for minutes after he stopped moving and minutes after the other officers around became concerned for Floyd's safety (and also possibly minutes after he stopped breathing).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/21 01:16 AM
10

This, for starters. Unlike in the US, there is very little recourse for being expelled, which can happen for any reason or no reason. Any reason. There isn't much in the headlines for sexual harassment, but when students are expelled over things like the above...
/r/MensRights01/04/21 10:23 AM
53

If someone sleeps with you for six months or a year, they get half of what you own (and vice versa). This can apply regardless of cohabitation.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 10:17 AM
109

In Canada: The DV arrest law in Ontario is as bad as Montana, if not worse. "Arrest the bigger one". DV shelters do not accept men as a general rule (there's no equality act like there is in the US). There is a law to increase women's pay to match men's based on job types that are most similar (not even similar, but simply the closest that exists), but not vice versa. Affirmative action is baked into the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This gets applied to criminal sentencing, and also many othe…
/r/MensRights01/04/21 06:23 AM
1

That's a nice list of issues, but that's also something I'd expect. That one brave UK politician that always starts an IMD debate probably has a good deal to do with the quality of that issue list.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/21 05:51 PM
9

Here.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 09:29 AM
8

Wasn't there that watch company with the response video?
/r/MensRights31/03/21 08:36 AM
3

Prison food in Canadian prisons is absolutely horrifying. They are selling potatoes as an add-on sale. Prison was bad before Harper, but after Harper the situation is so much worse. In Brazil this would actually be a women' issue as Conjugal visits are allowed for male prisoners but not female. Wow, that's terrible, good to know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/21 12:14 AM
1

Guess who’s side they took, the big 6,1 guy or the little 5,6 girl. I then got the old “you can’t hit a girl no matter what” talk and got detsuspention for 3 days, while she got nothing but a “warning”. Sometimes an unjust punishment is worth getting the message across that you're not an easy target. Also, remember this experience for when/if you start thinking about marriage. If you marry the wrong girl it will be the police and courts that determine the punishment, and it could cost you your j…
/r/MensRights30/03/21 10:48 PM
31

More details about the specific points is useful. Don't take any of this as real advice until vetted by at least someone other than me. I have feelings, needs, and desires. Disagreeing with those feelings, needs, and desires is valuable sometimes. Belittling them is bad. The former does not constitute the latter. Holding me accountable for things other people have done on account of my gender is not merely belittling. This is abuse. Holding others accountable for things other people have done on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/21 08:43 AM
0

On May 18, 2017, J.S. contacted the Minneapolis police department to report the incident. The police conducted an investigation and the State charged Khalil with one count of third-degree criminal sexual conduct involving a mentally incapacitated or physically helpless complainant. The State chose not to charge Khalil with fifth-degree criminal sexual conduct which criminalizes nonconsensual sexual contact, a charge both the State and Khalil conceded would cover the conduct alleged in this case …
/r/MensRights30/03/21 01:02 AM
7

Men's problem (such as the expectations for men from society like "men can't cry, or domestic violence on men) are important part of feminism for me. One of the things I despise about feminism is that it brainwashes otherwise empathetic people into not giving a fuck about issues that actually affect men and to induce paralysis on that front. Props to you for actually listing domestic violence on men as an issue, that's better than most manage. "men can't cry" is of course the prime example. It i…
/r/MensRights28/03/21 01:30 AM
1

But try posting that on the menslib, the mods will see the obvious parallel and ban you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/21 11:25 PM
15

It isn't necessarily about level of play either (it is, unfortunately, but not just). A lot of soccer is about running stamina, which, although not as gendered as upper body strength, is still not insignificant for dedicated play. If you want to see crappy levels of play, check out WNBA. Women's soccer losing to teenage boys is not a one-off thing. The US national team lost to an under-15 dallas team in a scrimmage. Manchester United women's team lost horribly to a boys team that was possibly hi…
/r/MensRights26/03/21 06:44 AM
16

I don’t wanna be the piñata for these ppl Good on you. There are hills to die on, as a student at school isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 09:57 PM
2

What did she do to piss off that judge? I mean sure, perjury ought to have a harsher penalty than that, but in the current climate that's an impressive sentence. She might even spend 12 whole months in a real prison.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 05:56 AM
2

It dates back much further than that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/21 07:16 PM
1

Yeah, English has some wording that gets confused, particularly "63% of 100" is not the same as "63% less than 100". I believe the following are true: "63% of 100 = 63" "100 less 63% ["of 100" is implied] = 37" "63% less than 100 = 37" "37% less than 100 = 63" "63% greater than 100 = 163" "100 plus 63% ["of 100" is implied] = 163" (for some reason "more" is ungrammatical here and "greater" doesn't seem right either) "163% of 100 = 163" "58.73% greater than 63 = ~100" "158.73% of 63 = ~100" These…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/21 11:47 AM
3

Who is "us" in this picture?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/21 01:09 AM
0

If one person dumps a ton of waste plastics in the ocean, there's no damage. If several thousand people do so, then there's damage. If someone takes one drink out of a lead mug, there's no damage. If someone does that for years on end, there's damage. For this reason leadware is not okay, because it is essential to think not only of the harm done of people's actions individually, but if anything would be grievous when applied at a large scale, then the default reaction ought to be to disallow th…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 09:47 AM
-21

No, there was actually no harm done here. There is no harm done here just like if someone didn't serve the guy because he was black, after all he could just do business with a less racist bakery. This sort of thing only becomes harmful when it becomes a collective behaviour. Therefore, what the OP did and said was absolutely correct. He... Got the heck out of there to avoid real material loss. Recognized the pettiness of the situation and didn't emotionally traumatize himself over an incident in…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:07 AM
-2

I disagree in a weird way. The blatant nature of generalizations made against men is extremely useful in pointing out the malignant hate that exists independently of those generalizations being used by people who don't think about them hard enough.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 07:53 PM
1

Man, you find a better term, then. I call it suicide rate, DV response, and (lack of) equality in childcare. DV response could be lumped into a larger group "institutional discrimination", but suicide rate cannot. Equality in childcare has to do with how society views men, but the suicide rate is complex and substantially has to do with economic stress and perception of the future. These are wildly different categories of issues anything that puts them in the same category other than "men's issu…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 07:49 PM
17

We could replace the first sentence of this FB post with "the mask of masculinity can also look like:" Except that these things aren't about appearances. There is nothing intangible about the suicide rate, response to male victims of domestic violence, or changing stations in bathrooms.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 04:03 AM
2

I think there is a whole lot of really useful work that could be done in terms of promoting men's mental health. Trying to explain and separate the genuinely useful psychology life advice from the APA and marriage counselling bullshit, for instance. However, my feeling is that useful approaches to men's mental health will at minimum actively map out some level of disagreement between therapist approaches. In this vein, I'm open to hearing more, but I am extremely suspicious of your approach to a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/21 12:09 AM
16

As someone who who endlessly hates on feminism I contend that the act of doing so is, in fact, helping. Because it isn't naive at all. Rather, opposition to feminism is necessary to break the power of the NOW and the other feminists organizations that essentially to a one promote sexism. Even coffee shop feminists believe in and now use the term patriarchy, a hateful term that alienates men. There are of course dozens (of thousands) of equity feminists that do not participate in this, but their …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/21 09:39 AM
3

Not all misandrists are feminists, not all feminists are misandrists. Although once a feminist starts using feminist terminology certainly I could call that person a misandrist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/21 06:08 PM
2

Nick Olivas, it isn't just Hermesmann vs Seyer.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 06:04 PM
1

I know that men's issues aren't the main topic of discussion, so if I want to talk about them I need to genuinely engage in the topic at hand and bring up relevant stuff. Then men's issues are a legitimate part of the discussion and everyone is on (mostly) the same page. Example? I think you're mostly full of shit here. As I noted, menslib issues are very different from mens issues. The environment created by feminism in feminist spaces is so crazy that it causes IRL social consequences for femi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/21 02:32 AM
26

Sure for unfair treatment. You will win. This is Mexico though, not the US.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 02:54 AM
7

Oh, if corporate is actually willing to fire her to avoid you pressing charges, then nevermind, your union lawyer is doing you great. However, I'd also be worried corporate is just buying time to ensure you can't do that to her later and give them trouble.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 08:19 AM
15

Your union lawyer wants what's best for the union, him telling you not to press charges is not necessarily in your best interest.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 05:31 AM
18

Men typically aren’t taught from a young age to dress a certain way Men are taught this. to not go out late at night Men are taught this, and for good reason. They are after all more likely to be attacked when they do. to not walk by yourself Who exactly is going to walk a man somewhere? to let someone know where you are at all times Men are taught this. to never leave your drink unattended etc Men are taught this, and I've heard stories of men learning this one the hard way. And when women do g…
/r/MensRights14/02/21 07:55 PM
4

The greater shame is for the teachers, judges, police, and parents of the offending children. A few 16 year old girls will engage in batshit social aggression, that will happen and cannot be prevented. However, the people who create an incentive for that aggression and destroy people's lives without evidence, those people have done real evil and are shameful indeed.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 07:49 PM
2

Agreed to an extent, but who wants to be the person to tell their fellow countrymen that the slogan some time ago "rape is rape" is extremely dangerous and wrong? Instead, it is worth focusing on the practical issue, that this "rape" should be discouraged. As a side effect it will also help demonstrate that Greer was right, much illegal sex is not legitimately worthy of the term "rape".
/r/MensRights12/02/21 06:17 PM
1

Emotional violence is not violence?
/r/MensRights12/02/21 08:14 AM
13

If there is any afterlife, there is no hiding place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/21 12:27 AM
3

Two news sources say fish, and that agrees with her wikipedia article which says that it is in IPA: /bæs/.
/r/MensRights07/02/21 04:03 AM
3

I admit I first read that like Bass the fish without thinking. Is it Bass the instrument? I'm genuinely mildly interested now.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 06:29 PM
2

Part 4: 16. Lack of support for male victims of sexual assault 17. Lack of support for male victims of domestic violence Yikes. And how. I think I've covered domestic violence a lot in referring to other issues. Suffice it to say that I could belabour the point further if I didn't feel tired after the other writeups. With regard to male victims of sexual assault, I believe the horror story is with respect to having to pay child support to a rapist. Though I don't think that case was specifically…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/21 03:16 AM
2

Part 3: analogous issues? 11. Parents are more likely to violently abuse their male child than the female ones (this is mostly an Indian thing tbh. All of the guy friends I know have received severe beatings from their parents while their sisters were never touched. My best friend is a girl and she told me how her parents hit her younger brother) Largely a result of "don't hit a girl", which is a traditionalist thing. However, feminism backs this massively in...everything really. Especially dome…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/21 03:10 AM
2

Part 2, mostly not feminism. 2. Men receive Less empathy .. 20. Negative stereotypes where men are always shown as evil I think it's hard not to lay these squarely on the face of feminism. It is not caused solely by feminism, but in the modern age, much of its present expression is determined by feminism. Read the Seneca Falls convention language for an early example of what feminists think of men. Read /r/menkampf for examples of your brain on the intersectional hegemonic privilege cult. 4. Unr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/21 02:33 AM
2

I've asked a few people over the years to list men's issues, but never have I received such a verbose list! This will be quite the exercise. Part 1: I could go on for days on these two issues Court Bias .. 3. Paternal Rights The earliest case of feminists fighting for courtroom bias that I could find is quite late, with feminist influence with DV law, in the 1970s, culminating with the work of Mary P. Koss into the 1990s. I contend that the opposition to the work of Richard Gelles had to do with…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/21 01:44 AM
2

Can you give me some examples of male problems that are caused by feminism? Give me a list of men's issues. I'll start listing the problems that feminism has caused from there. Not kidding, either. The involvement of feminism and especially the NOW is far-reaching, sometimes creating issues whole-cloth (such as university courts or VAWA), but more often maintaining the institutional power responsible for the status quo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/21 11:36 PM
1

If I am correct about your point (and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong!) you think that because women's issues and voices are so centered in our society, we must inevitably rely on them to champion our cause to the greater public--therefore we cannot simply turn this into a "men's club". Now if I am right about what you're saying... Mostly. I'm sorry for leaving ample room for that interpretation, but when I say "most effective with and will inevitably involve women", I mean these two things…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/21 12:09 AM
1

Btw r/Menkampf is for when people make jabs at men that would be unacceptable if they targeted Jews or black people, etc. I’m honestly not sure why you brought it up. Would you mind explaining? r/menkampf points out how dumb and hateful solidarity of women against men is, or of black/lantio people against white people, or of trans against cishet. Now what you're proposing is not solidarity against another group and I by no means see these as the same thing, but I see part of the problem with suc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/21 10:34 PM
7

I could go on but my point is that this idea of male worthlessness coming from men ourselves is why I push for a unified male solidarity. We have enough enemies without turning on each other. I admit I am one of those who sees this as preposterous. In fact, I see it as preposterous as solidarity based on race (r/menkampf) or to a lesser extent nationality. Rather, people who share a noble goal are those people who need to work together, so humanists, philanthropists, altruists, egalitarians.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/21 06:51 PM
1

I don't think that reveals any growing need, to be perfectly fair.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/21 07:45 AM
8

Radical feminists tend to be permanently aggrieved, this makes them more prone to make DV and other accusations, whether of DV that was coaxed out the accused or simply false accusations. This is one of the potential explanations for feminist men tending to end up painted as abusers (the other potential explanation is that more male feminists actually are abusers than the general population of men). Admittedly coaxing DV out of a partner is a somewhat normal occurrence for manipulative and/or pa…
/r/MensRights31/01/21 04:51 PM
8

Oh wow, I had heard of this guy, he did some great work. I never realized he got MeTooed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/21 05:19 PM
2

I know there's still a debate about whether or not Biden and his woke administration will ultimately be harmful to men Is there truly a debate about this?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/21 12:37 AM
5

Warranted, in some circumstances men are afraid of random men -- everyone should be more afraid of physical violence from men than women. Feminism does seem to want to take it into crazyland, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/21 03:34 AM
1

Do the Benefits of College Still Outweigh the Costs? Jaison R. Abel and Richard Deitz I've already explained this is every bit the Wage Gap Myth Redux. So, college is more beneficial to people from high-income families than low-income families. Their wages correlate higher. If higher income families receive more benefit, it is worth questioning why. We're talking over double here, it is a tad ridiculous. This may have more to do with nepotism in the workplace than it does college. Why would you …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/21 10:54 AM
1

Its possible. But women say that they are more concerned about the cost of tuition than men are on the one survey Of freshmen. This is a survey that is noting the gender of those people who don't know how they will pay for college but still attend. That may as well have written "more women take on large debt without a plan than men". It doesn't measure what you imply at all. But men not going to college still has negative effects on their earnings All college? That's a silly way to measure. Star…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/21 08:37 PM
1

That cuts both ways. Being able to save 5k without a degree doesn't mean that you can do that indefinitely. The point being the opportunity cost. The people that I know who kept a STEM job in their field are about as many as those that I know who are now working as baristas or something else of similar relevance. But for the latter, not having gotten a STEM degree would put them ahead, including due to not having their professional career on their resume. “That men are not more involved in post …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/21 10:55 AM
1

I contest this. The lower earnings from post secondary is only in some cases worth the financial risk. If you can save 5k/year without a degree, and 10k/year with a degree (close to though not necessarily immediately right-out-of schooling), I'd opt for the former, because that doesn't necessarily mean you can keep doing that indefinitely. A bad economic situation and/or poor compatibility with the job you choose 5 years before being able to work in that job could cause underemployment and overq…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/21 06:05 AM
3

And that is (of course) that people just don’t like the word ‘men's rights’ – so we need to find a way of disarming the bigots who use this This is mostly a lie, it has been tried. The objection that people have isn't to the name, but the very idea of a viewpoint that rejects what I consider to be a particularly extreme sort of hyperagency. This guy tried it in Austria, Warren Farrell tried it and is still trying it, it doesn't work. It talks openly about men's issues, but instead of saying 'men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/21 01:31 AM
6

It's obvious that the world is focussed on women's issues at the minute (which is a real historical anomaly) It's obvious you don't know your labour history, which should be very odd for a left-winger. Labour safety legislation in the US was for women only initially, and you can look back further and find the same focus on women's issues earlier in history. The theme of history in this regard is rather a focus on men's power and women's wellbeing -- a focus that remains to this day. I'd also sug…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/21 03:54 PM
12

In contrast, I've never had any bad reaction in feminist spaces to bringing up the issues MRAs talk about. Issues like what, haha? You'll get banned on just about any feminist space on reddit. Unless you're talking about issues that menslib brings up, which is something very different. Lacy Green lost IRL friends just for being willing to dialogue with some MRAs mostly so she could better disagree with them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/21 12:47 PM
11

I believe the OP is addressing this: For example, try to imagine if a couple (We'll call them Jack and Steve) are involved in a car accident and both die. Then the news media starts to circulate the story, but they only talk about how devastating the car accident was to Steve. No mention is ever made about Jack. Now, let's say that people begin lobbying the car maker to alter its automobile design to better suit people who are similar to Steve's body type. If someone asks why the automobile desi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/21 12:19 PM
2

You need to photoshop one steamed potato into the image, then it's fine.
/r/MGTOW20/01/21 07:04 AM
10

I mean, even if she did it wouldn't be big news. Kissinger won that peace prize, for his work in regards to the last four years of the Vietnam war.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 02:16 AM
1

I didn't call you dishonest. I'm saying that you have a shit justification.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 01:17 PM
0

I was trying to convince him, not just be right. (Which, as constructive criticism, seems to be your priority.) Being honest is a priority, yes. If you want to use that as a justification I'd ask you what you think of the socially conservative preacher who offers the "completely and utterly free gift of salvation". My apologies, I am especially hostile to this particular idea. He did not understand the connection between feminism and lack of mens services. There's no need to zoom out to 10,000 f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 01:08 PM
3

Aight cliff notes time: I don't feel like they're doing it on purpose and I don't feel like they're doing to hurt boys or get ahead or something. Accepting the poison premise, their eagerness to do whatever-it-is is so ravenous that they allow their actions to be absolutely ruinous to the children of broken families. [more examples] With that level of devastation, it doesn't matter whether feminist institutions are doing it on purpose. Do you think it does? Do you deny the damage? And all of tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 01:03 PM
1

Feminism is heterogeneous. Sure. That doesn't mean that as long as CHS still draws breath every criticisms of feminist ideas needs a disclaimer -- particularly when this is about those ideas that are the feminist ideas currently implemented in government practice with respect to DV! I think part of our disconnect is that you seem to look at feminism from a slice-in-time, say, 2020 perspective. The context was a question as to whether feminism (not all feminism, mind, but just that feminism) itse…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 12:50 PM
9

It would be nice to eventually have a real response rather than a brilliant moment of word association though ^^.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 12:25 PM
1

VAWA is also living proof (well, okay, in the living document sense) that it is not merely and not primarily the funding that causes feminist DV orgs to oppose orienting help toward men. It is ideology, their models of the world. In order to create the funding disparity, feminist organizations in the US had to fight to replace the existing funding equality. In the abstract. But it goes so, so far beyond funding to the more dire actions that I mentioned.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 12:23 PM
-1

Is VAWA not abstract enough for you, or does it lack a feminist org point of view? I'm clearly confused.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 12:18 PM
-1

I'm not trying to contradict your point, although perhaps I do ("Perhaps not...to blame" is something which I do object to), but rather that it is an absolutely horrible answer to say "but equal funding" when the bulk of the MRM objection to things like VAWA, to UK legal aid, or to the actions of DV shelters, has very little to do with funding and which is generally more dire!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 12:04 PM
-5

What a horrible answer. Look into father's rights organizations and take a listen to what these female-oriented domestic abuse prevention organizations do quite directly to men. It isn't simply about sharing funding, or applying even the most bare sense of equity to government funds (which is a minor problem, don't get me wrong), it is about some really quite brutal shit, from police training to legal aid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 11:58 AM
5

What on Earth does Turner have to do with any of this?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 11:55 AM
11

I don't feel like they're doing it on purpose and I don't feel like they're doing to hurt boys or get ahead or something. Accepting the poison premise, their eagerness to do whatever-it-is is so ravenous that they allow their actions to be absolutely ruinous to the children of broken families. Separately from that, the DV support situation with battered men being told they are abusers is unconscionable and created by feminists. Separately from that, the situation with university "courts" is crea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/21 11:31 AM
1

It is a snark on a common feminist saying "When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression." It isn't really true, but if you're indoctrinated into a cult, it can be made to be.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 11:05 AM
2

But if you're going to a fat party with a bunch of assholes, and inebriated, your inability to make rationale decisions in such an environment...I never understood why women would put themselves in a situation like that. I never understood why men would put themselves in a situation like that.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 07:30 PM
1

Indeed. Does it show three at this link?
/r/MensRights15/01/21 09:35 PM
1

Check it out, you have posted three copies of that one.
/r/MensRights15/01/21 05:46 PM
1

t-t-t-triple post!
/r/MensRights15/01/21 05:36 PM
3

Ancient Rome might be described as patriarchal because only men could be politicians. Could not the same objections to patriarchy in general be leveled at this, however? The concept of men being in leadership roles to the exclusion of women is one thing, but patriarchy the way feminism describes patriarchy is something else entirely.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/21 03:27 AM
3

Isn't there that one elected guy in the UK?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/21 01:06 AM
5

Because there are two large cultural mistakes (or deliberate deviance) in that paragraph. Firstly that no one should be considered more right or wrong because of their gender, or less of an advocate for men's issues because of it (and certainly just because someone is a man that doesn't give them experience of men's issues) -- this sub finds that sort of thing appalling. Secondly support of feminism writ large or any assertion of the falsehood that the sufferagettes or early feminist movement la…
/r/MensRights14/01/21 02:39 AM
0

I don't think it is. However, it is something that is a bit different from other issues in that like father's rights, there already existed a non-MRM group addressing it, and that it is concerning a small group of males for whom hyperagency doesn't apply.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 02:29 AM
2

There's places on this planet where only women's genitals are mutilated List one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/21 10:37 AM
1

Few tasks are more like the torture of Sisyphus than housework, with its endless repetition: the clean becomes soiled, the soiled is made clean, over and over, day after day. … Eating, sleeping, cleaning – the years no longer rise up towards heaven, they lie spread out ahead, grey and identical. The battle against dust and dirt is never won. To be fair, I actually agree with this part. But no one today really spends a lot of time cleaning by necessity, a few hours per week is more than enough --…
/r/MensRights11/01/21 02:13 AM
6

While it was very optimized for a 1990s build, college/university has been nerfed repeatedly both in cost and benefit in the past decades. It still is situationally viable (it has never been something you could throw into *every *build, mind), but is on its way to becoming a dubious build. When it works it still works, but if it doesn't pay off you're kinda hooped, and the kinds of careers that it builds into (assuming that you're deliberately building into a career) while worthwhile financially…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/21 12:57 PM
1

Paternal surrender is a gender neutral goal because we already have maternal surrender. When that isn't the case, then paternal surrender becomes suspect, but not before.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/21 05:46 PM
2

I can't relate to this at all. Maybe there is something I'm not seeing, but I don't get what kind of logical connection you can draw about someone's broader personality based on their clothes. Geeks tend to (not always) dress different from metalheads, who dress different from outright emo, who dress different from outdoorsmen. Golf club professional is a bit different from rig professional. Certain brands can sometimes mean certain things too. And that's just the meaning one can find in guys' c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/21 07:55 AM
1

Naturally intellectual venting doesn't result in the most concise thoughts. I don't think we really disagree on too too much so far. However, I think I at least am very cautious about this: On the other end of the spectrum, whether or not someone has an expensive car tells you nothing about whether they will be a good mate or not. Unless all you care about is money, which I guess is fine, but that says a lot more about you than the men. I think this is an extreme position to take on what status …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/21 03:41 AM
2

They didn't always earn an income from the work they did. And that meant that logically men needed to foot the bill on dates. That is completely fair. However, I'm still not sure that's how the modern practice originated. In the time of which you speak this thing called a 'date' didn't really exist in the way it does now. I suspect there is a 1940s-1970s reason for the way that men pay for a date, and I suspect that it is more about, as usual, men trying to impress socially important women than …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/21 08:11 PM
1

That originated during a time where women didn't work or earn their own income. What time, pray, was this? Women have always worked, though there are some wealthy people of both sexes that have neglected to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/21 08:02 PM
1

Do reread that. The beginning of the paragraph makes clear that part of the point of the post is to elucidate how ridiculous that is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/21 07:59 PM
2

So likewise "a woman won't call you again unless you pay for the first date" is outdated hogwash It is not outdated at all. Even otherwise alright women who are not looking to be merely provided for may be quite put off by going Dutch. But it is also not completely true and probably worth doing anyways as a filter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/21 07:57 PM
5

But the fact that people don't admit how evil it is to say the reverse (men are reduced to utility objects) but they do admit how evil it is to reduce women to sex objects (another kind of utility), only shows where the bias/double standard is. ...Yes, I've literally gotten into arguments with people where I challenged them on this point, and in order to not look like a complete hypocrite, they had to say "it's ok if a guy only values women for looks, that's just the way he is and there is nothi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/21 11:40 AM
5

The VAWA act, despite its shitty and sensationalist wording, was operatively gender-neutral Bull-fucking shit. VAWA created gendered institutions which created gendered regulations. If that isn't operative, I don't know what is. On top of that, it is ultimately responsible for DV shelters having their names changed to women's shelters, which was then followed up by a change of practice. A practice that the NCFM fought to change with a long and dirty lawsuit against feminists in order to get VAWA…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/20 11:49 PM
6

a society characterised by male dominance A society characterized by male dominance is not the same thing as a society that has male power in it, one that has areas of greater general male influence. Similarly, a society wherin a few men have inordinate amounts of power is not a society characterized by the dominance of maleness. Stop playing a shell game and don't swap your terms (or allow your terms to be swapped by /u/mhandanna). People playing the shell game makes it vague -- it doesn't help…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/20 01:16 AM
6

Patriarchy: society is created by men specifically to oppress women and privilege men. This is a key definition of patriarchy and this way of thinking has been around since at least Seneca Falls. However, even for less restrictive definitions such as what I consider to be the strongest definition that comes off of geekfeminismwiki: "Patriarchy is a term used in feminism to describe the system of gender-based hierarchy in society which assigns most power to men, and assigns higher value to men, m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/20 06:56 PM
5

I think I heard that twice. Certainly not most. And that itself is unfortunately not what the term means. Feminism has at no point seriously attempted to loosen the male gender role, but has piled on guilting attempt after guilting attempt in order to emphasize male duty -- all while using the term toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:43 AM
24

Feminists: Lets raise attention to men's vulnerabilities Incels: We got plenty Feminists: Evil scum! We don't want to help you!
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:39 AM
1

That is a quite a level of ignorance coming from someone making claims about elections. Elections are very rarely "the most votes wins". In Canada it's the most "ridings" wins. As a Canadian I can tell you that you do not know enough about Canadian elections. There is no one election for Canadian Parliaments and Legislatures, as each electoral district is its own election in that sense (Canada doesn't have a multi-winner voting system yet). There is no Prime-Ministerial election in Canada. But s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/20 07:26 AM
1

While you make some good points, I cannot support what you're saying at all. "Systematically oppressed" is not what social negotiation is. If you want oppressed, get yourself drafted or something. If you want to get into the cesspool that is the dating game, there are no victims, only volunteers.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 07:51 PM
4

What a weird comment. Parent and grandparent are talking about objectification and you equate to assault? EDIT: Wait a sec, you're doing that deliberately and going full NPC-mode, I guess logic really is a tool of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 01:07 AM
3

Strange study, it is hard to get exactly what they are measuring. It may be that they come up with this conclusion almost entirely because men are more likely to identify as politically independent, rather than because women are more likely to be strongly partisan. I wouldn't know, the study isn't very straightforward with its raw data and leaps right into models.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 06:14 PM
2

I mean, they deserved it a long time ago when they started messing with worldwide copyright law. Thankfully it would seem that at the moment they are well on their way.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 11:00 PM
2

It basically means acquitted Technically speaking I think (I absolutely don't know) those terms don't have much overlap. Acquitted means you're never convicted, exonerated means your conviction is overturned.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 05:35 PM
1

I'm afraid this study isn't worth much. Essentially it is comparing the personality traits of adults based on one specific instance in the developmental stage of a child. This line of research is confounded by a large collection of things, but most especially, it is confounded by characteristics of parents that would circumcise a child vs not. The "Sociosexuality" measure was the largest difference found, and to me suggests that circumcising families may be on average slightly more conservative …
/r/MensRights28/11/20 08:19 PM
5

Feminists call it 'patriarchy', mostly antifeminists are the ones to use the phrase 'patriarchy theory'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/20 02:13 PM
7

It is, but it is like mormon egyptology. Falsification isn't a problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/20 02:00 PM
2

That's in the US, and largely because of equality legislation. Places like Australia and Canada learned from the "mistake" of feminists in the US and have "equality" legislation that only goes one way.
/r/MensRights16/11/20 09:37 PM
1

I don't think there is anything wrong with it, it is just harder for people to work it out because something that is 3.08x is not less so it ends up being something of a garden path statistic (even though the wording does make it clear at the end one needs to multiply by 1/3.08 or 0.324x). "Less than a third as likely" is probably easier.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/20 09:24 PM
2

I disagree with /u/OkLetterhead10 on this. The primary point being made is not about education or crime, but about intersectionalism. Splitting it up would be more likely to change that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/20 09:18 PM
1

I don't get why people like that post, to be honest. Things like Don't offer personal advice for systemic problems. Are rather wrong and damaging. Even something like MGTOW is personal advice for systemic problems. Personal advice for systemic problems is important! Don't minimize This is an extremely double-edged thing to say. There comes a point when the problems legitimately do get small. Banning minimizing language when it comes to discussing something like microagressions is legitimately da…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/20 09:04 PM
1

Must be decently validating for you, though. Nice catch.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 08:46 PM
5

It's better how this ended up, because mental health issues should not make people criminals When the criminally insane take a knife to a child, yes, that should make someone a criminal. No, it is not better how things turned out, this is unsafe.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 06:55 PM
5

If it is affecting you negatively, take a break from social media. You're worth more than words on a page.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 11:47 PM
2

Omg even for when they were in the majority? That’s just poor planning. No, it isn't poor planning. You're just new to this. Canada has it bad, affirmative action applies to government jobs (like in libraries and stuff) that are already mostly women and were almost never a male thing (never in Canada's history, anyways), in addition to the university bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 10:04 AM
2

Are you sure it doesn't make a difference? Yes, 100% sure, at least in the context that is being described (being more bombastic may help get attention, but being polite and reasonable doesn't result in a less hostile reaction from those who spew feminist disinformation). Look up Warren Farrell and what happened to him. He's also not the only one who's been ultra careful about the associations he makes and the way he says things. You don't know your history, no one needs you to to advocate for i…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 09:55 AM
1

I love Karen Straughan for stuff like this. While I certainly support turning some economic things upside-down, I'm also not anti-fact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/20 05:20 AM
5

Hasn't he said he'll do just that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/20 08:16 PM
11

Nah, Biden was talking about this before his own MeToo. He was extremely gung ho for "believe the woman" until his own MeToo, but that I don't think even that changed his perspective. It's actually really impressive how Biden is on that topic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/20 08:16 PM
4

Hey now, he hasn't won yet. The US is a banana republic when it comes to voting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/20 08:14 PM
1

Feminism...has very little power in India. Though they were able to fight against a rape law sooo. Feminism has lots of power in India, not only over law as you point out, but to the point of forming very aggressive mobs to beat up men on a mere accusation without reprisal from government. Indian culture also bends to the institutional power of feminism, most aggressively with regard to the dowry law. With regard to Hindu religion or culture being more enforced in law, that isn't really the case…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/20 10:37 PM
1

I mean, mostly I'm going to argue that if the police apply one standard for dowry are they going to apply another standard for stridhan? I do ask again though, do people get arrested for violating the "similar customs" in Pakistan? But for an anecdote one might try the comment from this webpage: in many cases of 498a ,dva, list of gifts ,articles is not made during or after marriage and it is not signed by anyone. after some time( few years) ,when the wife has left husbands home and started livi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/20 10:16 PM
1

In India, feminism has pushed a believe the woman standard with regard to dowry claims and breach of trust (which in this case refers to a marital property dispute over stridhan). Even if similar customs apply -- does a criminal arrest apply in Pakistan over this sort of thing? -- in India it is inextricable from the feminist-demanded police response and evidentiary standards over 498A.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/20 09:48 PM
1

If you think that, I suspect you have no conception of the relationship between stridhan and dowry, as well as the nature of false claims of the latter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/20 08:30 PM
5

Indian culture is feminist in this fashion, however. 498A and all that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/20 01:27 AM
13

domestic violence programs protect women only, a man is guilty with no proof, big corporations forced by the laws to have 50% women on top position These things do not a holocaust make?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/20 06:28 PM
3

Basically during the cold war the rise of Gloria Steinem was funded by the CIA (to be fair, they funded some pretty random shit back in the day). Additionally the Rockefeller Foundation got involved in pushing feminism in the 70s. Its just one of the many ways in which although feminism might have seemed like a counterculture on the surface, it was adopted by the government as a counter-counterculture. Look up the government response to feminist bombings in the UK, and the white feather campaign…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/20 04:20 PM
3

If feminism wasn't itself involved with the CIA in plans to disrupt the labor movement, it certainly couldn't have done a better job of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/20 01:41 AM
6

Isn't that the prosecutor's problem, not the judge's?
/r/MensRights22/10/20 07:51 PM
1

Sad I had to look down so far to see an answer founded on the core ethical issue. Yes, there are many problems with the statement, but this is what makes it wrong.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 11:11 PM
10

Good for them for doing good work to help others! But I view it like this. I guess my attitude is, you shouldn't overpower/speak over others in a group. I view this as one of the many reasons why (especially intersectional) feminism is a hate movement. Karen Straughan has a powerful voice and everyone should be glad that she uses it, because what is important isn't that people get paid for their advocacy based on the immutable characteristics with which they were born, what is important is that …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/20 08:04 PM
1

Humans are miserable creatures that way. There comes a time when you look into the mirror and you realize that what you see is all that you will ever be. And then you accept it. Or you kill yourself. Or you stop looking in mirrors. Look up "hedonic treadmill". if you like.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 11:42 PM
1

My apologies, you had argued according to law last post and I, reading that neglected the earlier comments you had made. Sorry. In that case, however, you have no reasonable argument to sperm as a gift, however, because such a thing is not (usually) given unconditionally. You have additionally created an unequal responsibility, because it would still seem to me that under your proposal consent to sex would still be equivalent to consent to parenthood for men, but not for women. Sex would be like…
/r/MensRights05/10/20 09:00 PM
1

You aren't arguing that exclusive right at the moment, you are arguing for the authority to demand that a man pay for the woman's exclusive right and responsibility (based on the man having a part in the completed child, but not the sperm that is a gift or the incomplete child which is exclusively hers).
/r/MensRights05/10/20 08:38 PM
1

I would imagine if you base your argument on affirming the moral legitimacy of stealthing, there is a larger issue with the argument than I would have previously thought.
/r/MensRights05/10/20 07:43 PM
2

Because the woman owns her own body. She has an exclusive right to the decision whether to carry the fetus into "personhood" (whichever law says e.g 6 months). She therefore has exclusive responsibility for that decision. Where's the equal exclusive responsibility and rights for men in this case? You are in error because you recognize unilateral rights and responsibilities for women, but only allow rights and responsibilities for men with agreement. The rationale you give for this is that sperm …
/r/MensRights05/10/20 04:24 PM
2

Ew, URL shorteners on reddit are evil. You can shorten URLs by typing this: [wage data](https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2019/01/28/how-big-is-the-wage-penalty-for-mothers), [data on parental choice](https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/03/14/chapter-1-changing-views-about-work/) This will then look like: wage data, data on parental choice That way people can still mouseover your links and know they aren't going somewhere that will explode their web browser and/or speakers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/20 07:39 PM
2

You are living paycheck to paycheck, but your wife is a practising attorney and you make substantially more than she. This is hella strange. If my assumptions are reasonable about what you are saying (and you are set on divorce as an inevitable conclusion), then I offer this advice: construct a budget and make plans to live more simply. If you can plan to save 15k per year for the custody battle, that you are temporarily in debt doesn't matter so much. This ought to be reasonable given the incom…
/r/MensRights03/10/20 07:37 AM
3

If I was innocent, I'd much rather get convicted of 3 counts of murder than get married and go through a contested divorce with alimony and child support at the end. That being said, I'd definitely rather initiate a divorce than murder my own children.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 04:01 AM
3

divorce courts are better than criminal court. I'm not so sure. Criminal court will leave you with 3 hots and a cot. In the US and Canada, family court is not so forgiving. Murder is wrong and evil, but I suspect it may be the case that the current system of family court is incentivizing murder.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 12:16 AM
1

When it comes to serious dangers, it's a the business of culture in general to have best practices that don't put people in danger by default. Its everyone's business, not a matter that's only suitable for a small circle of friends. Now as far as individual action there's the matter of sanity, stopping everyone coming out of a bar for questioning is not sane. But neither is a culture that normalizes drunk people going into situations that would put them alone with one competent person (unless th…
/r/MensRights27/09/20 05:45 AM
0

If you have good reason to ensure that said drunk is in good hands, go ahead. But don’t just go up to everyone escorting a drunk person, suspecting them of evil intentions. If a girl takes a drunk guy away from where your group is, not knowing anything about the desires of the guy, I would hope you would default to objecting.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 01:29 AM
-1

If you have to “verify” that everyone escorting a drunk person has bad intentions, you are making an assumption It isn't about assumptions...The Pence rule is not about assuming that anyone who violates it is doing something wrong, it is about keeping things above board. No, there is no assumption being made in commending this action. If so, you would have to say that the Pence rule is making bad assumptions about one's own intentions, which is clearly ridiculous.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 01:21 AM
0

This is completely mistaken. You are are assuming that what makes this story about a good act is the sexist profiling. Now I do happen think that profiling is a good thing, but that isn't primarily what is good about confronting a competent person taking a drunk person into a car alone. A competent person taking a drunk person into a car alone -- regardless of gender -- is a high risk situation.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 01:19 AM
-5

It isn't about assumptions, its a matter of verification. The Pence rule is not about assuming that anyone who violates it is doing something wrong, it is about keeping things above board. People who are drunk beyond a certain point are in the hands of those who are not and I believe it is in the interest of society that such people are not alone with only one other (or at very least, that it can be shown that the person they are alone with accepted that risk when they were sober). And this is w…
/r/MensRights27/09/20 01:12 AM
1

I didn't downvote him though, haha, it just came across as rude to me. To be fair, society as a whole is annoyingly subtle like that. In a different context, that question would've been just fine.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 06:09 PM
9

He needs to explain what it is that he didn't understand and not just ask for the entire thing again but reworded.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 04:57 PM
-6

Is there sexism here? Probably. Is this sort of thing a good thing to do? Yeah, yeah it is.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 04:56 PM
2

I only have one problem with this, and that is that BLM is supposed to mean something in particular, because it means very different things to different people and its practice is completely divorced from its definition. BLM is as much about black lives as feminism is about equality (indeed they share intersectionalist theory and its rigid placement of men and women). To an extent, the BLM movement (prior to the org) has a less ignoble history than feminism, but I am still rather wary about argu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/20 05:59 PM
10

Twitter is itself a horrible system that doesn't lend itself to much except abuse. Why would anyone subject themselves to that shit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/20 05:52 PM
7

Its not about any transgression, its that marriage is a loaded gun, and as a man you don't give that to someone who hates men.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 07:12 PM
10

You are probably the kind of guy who dismiss evidence as feminist propaganda especially if the historian is female. You do realize one of his primary sources is a female historian. Oh wait, you don't, because you didn't read the topic.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 01:47 AM
8

This is a good example of why you don't want to cite an ill researched collab document. On this topic the collab is exceedingly light on details (part of what makes it ill researched, if it were more detailed it couldn't reach those conclusions in the same manner). Wikipedia in particular is a collab that is known for being especially bad on political issues such as this. Save for "Women in Ancient Greece" this is not scholarly, but is citations to other encyclopedias and an aggressively feminis…
/r/MensRights18/09/20 12:01 AM
9

You could discuss the topic, or you could link an ill researched collab document that cites issues that the the topic itself clearly describes as mistaken with respect to certain assertions. It would also help to link an article that limits itself to the oppression of women, which that link does not (for obvious reasons, it is about women's rights after all) and to a historical context, which that link does not, and a western context which the topic does. If you want to have a discussion you'll …
/r/MensRights17/09/20 09:33 PM
2

doesn't she prefer her name lowercase Ah, you're right. I simply have only read excerpts. I have been considering reading bell hooks as a start to diving deep into the source materials for postmodern feminism. I think that if I were to do so, I would also start there (well, either there or someone older, like perhaps Sally Miller Gearheart). The crucial work is of course "Feminism is for Everyone". From the excerpts I've seen of it, it is a pretty good example of why feminism is a hate movement,…
/r/MensRights11/09/20 08:53 PM
4

The language is quite precise, because how patriarchy theory is talked about when people are challenging it is very different from how it is applied when unchallenged to dismiss a male's misfortune -- even and especially when that misfortune is caused by a feminist system. I like to refer to this comment on Bell Hooks, probably the single radical feminist with the greatest empathy for men, yet still finds the need to blame men for their own suffering at the hands of the male gender role.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 10:26 AM
3

Now that might be a sign of progress. Is it normal to have 2/3rds of your sentence suspended though?
/r/MensRights09/09/20 02:11 AM
5

He went way overboard, though. What he did was way, way less damaging than throwing a punch, which would have also been justified. If he had dropped her on her head, sure, that'd've been overboard, but he basically gently dropped her away from him so that she couldn't continue to attack him and then advanced on her slightly. She didn't actually get tossed toward the floor even, but was kinda rolled onto her knee (so there was no chance of her falling over and hitting her head on the wall). It wa…
/r/MensRights09/09/20 02:05 AM
3

Much of it isn't a way to evoke racial acrimony, sure, but some of it is. As to it not leaving whites at a disadvantage, that is true, but only because discrimination in general has little to no evidence that it leaves people groups at a disadvantage. Only if you think all of your problems are to blame on those things, yeah. That's not what that phrase means though. It means that the black to white wealth gap needs to shrink for its own sake, which implies a penalty to current people based on th…
/r/MensRights09/09/20 01:02 AM
6

No ones saying you have to eat shit and pay for the injustices that past Americans caused... affirmative action...the black to white wealth gap to shrink. These are contradictory ideas, no?
/r/MensRights08/09/20 09:22 PM
1

One of the horrific games that family court likes to play is psych evaluations. The basic idea is not completely unsound in that the children should go to a mentally fit spouse. In this case the rubrick is greatly in your favor, though as others point out the courts don't always acknowledge this. Showing up without an attorney is probably far worse than any of that for her. Congratulations, but not sign of positive change.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 04:16 PM
1

No, the wording as you have it is clearly bullshit. However, a large part of violent crimes probably do fit into this category.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/20 04:27 AM
2

Its reddit, /s is necessary, particularly when this sub does regularly get brigaded.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 10:07 PM
1

I am hesitant to comment when I feel that's the case because people need a safe space to vent too. This sub isn't anything remotely resembling a safe space, though. It has a free speech moderation policy!
/r/MensRights01/09/20 10:02 PM
1

Thank you for this post! I’ve been a lurker for a while simply because I thought women’s voices were not welcome here or at the very least frowned upon. This is what the feminist hate movement does to its members, but the MRM doesn't do this. Allyship is a horrible, horrible concept.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 09:57 PM
2

Was there ever a time when women weren't allowed to own property? In the "west", was there ever a time when women were outright forbidden from learning to read and write (hint, the first woman teacher at a university was some nearly 800 years ago)? Was there ever a time in the west where a women could not be on her own in public from the top to the bottom of society? I'm pretty that last rule was only for those who could afford it. No, with the exception of the vote, those things didn't ever hap…
/r/MensRights31/08/20 01:13 AM
1

This same person accused her professor of sexual harassment because she was failing, nothing happened to him other than an embarrassing process. Good for him, some professors have gone through the wringer for that. The courts have always had a difficult job, trying to arrive at a just conclusion in a sea of misinformation and sophistry. Trying to maintain impartiality when every other party wants them to be anything but. It fails a lot. But though "justice" has been meeted out by a variety of me…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/20 08:52 PM
1

Just at the very least make sure you're not marrying a BPD (or if you prefer video form), and that you know what sort of contract you're getting into. Ensure you are marrying someone who is commitment-compatible, or at very least, not completely commitment-incompatible. Neither of you should have prior divorces, lots of sexual partners, demand expensive gifts, have clear signs of financial irresponsibility (substantial consumer debt, auto loan), and absolutely should not be known to hold a grudg…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/20 08:53 AM
1

It did absolutely not. Whoops. My bad, that was a federal court, not the supreme court. It is on its way to the supreme court. What do you think of the Violence Against Women Act? As I said, the legislative changes would be more substantial. Obviously that needs to be gotten rid of. More specifically, all of the departments created by the act need to be scrapped and rebuilt from the ground up because they were created with an inegalitarian perspective, which has been demonstrated in multiple cir…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/20 10:16 PM
1

I suppose I disagree. Appellate courts have upheld student's due process, the supreme court did away with the draft. The problem with non-family courts seen to me to have more to do with Women are Wonderful than misandry, which the courts seem to despise. As such, I don't really see that as a deep reform. Certainly a significant reform, but it does not appear to me yet that a revolutionary paradigm change from within the courts is what is called for, but rather the legislative and prosecutorial …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/20 08:13 PM
13

The court is precisely what protects people like us from the excesses of institutionalized feminism. Want to see what happens when a non-court processes your claims? Have a look at the university system. Family court needs a right revolution, but the idea of the court of law itself is not only sane, it is one of the few possible ways to sane dispute resolution between irreconcilable (sorry) parties. Q: My order was never served, I can prove that I'm a victim of Domestic Abuse, I can prove that I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/20 09:26 AM
1

I think trying to reclaim the white feather is a bad idea, but that it is still appropriate as a symbol of the present and past evils of feminism. Adding the democrat blue isn't the best idea both because its making a political point that is extremely obtuse and because the subreddit symbol is now entirely rooted in what this subreddit is not and not what it is. Picking a colour at random (that just happens to be blue) or based off of something from the MRM or some egalitarian symbol would make …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/20 10:26 PM
2

I guess it's entirely possible that test scores have always lagged though. Ah, This conversation is substantially because I'm being unclear. What I am saying is that standardized test scores alone in high school and below do seem to result in boys having better results in math, but this does not mean that boys have better results in math courses in high school and below. In fact, in math courses in high school and below boys did not have better results than girls within the past century. While C…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/20 09:44 PM
2

Stopped what? You mean the graph seems to flatline? Yeah, I got no answers for you there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/20 08:20 PM
2

That's complicated. I don't know all of the reasons. The reasons include boys' being biologically more likely to have learning disabilities like autism and ADHD (the amount varies highly by country and effects younger students, but also speech impediments and other learning disabilities are still basically twice as common in boys. Boys being much less interested in reading for various reasons is a large factor. There are obvious reasons such as boys wanting to play physically more than girls, bu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/20 08:15 PM
2

Marginally better. The push for boys' reading attainment in Australia and the dropping of the "whole-language" approach is a 2005-2006 event. Looking at data from here, here, and here can give you a picture, but try to make sure you're comparing like-to-like -- for instance, the 2nd and 3rd links there have very comparable data, but you need to make sure you're looking at the year 5 benchmarks' gender gap (pg 27-28 of the 2nd link, 2nd tab of the 3rd link).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/20 08:05 PM
2

For the latter question, reading the 2011 CCL paper would be a good idea. For the former question, reading the 2011 CCL paper would also be a good idea, but it is worth noting that Australia completely dumpstered its unique method for language learning precisely because boys and students less able to deal with language in large chunks were disadvantaged by it. This Ontario recommendation document is also interesting for inspiration for the latter question.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/20 07:25 PM
2

The study (and summary thereof) I link here includes US data. The myth I reference is most certainly not true in the US. CHS most likely was using standardized testing data, this study is about class scores. Though the study does note the following also: In fact, the popular press and elected representatives still focus on findings that fit stereotypical expectations (e.g., Tyre, 2006), despite an attempt over 20 years ago by Kimball (1989) to bring the female advantage to light for mathematics.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/20 07:21 PM
3

Grading bias against boys is an interesting subject. I suspect it is wholly different at the elementary level from the university level. Grading bias against boys is, of course, documented in high school and boys aren't ignorant about it, but the prevalence of such likely doesn't affect boys' outcomes super much in aggregate. Individual boys may be pushed away from certain careers as a result, but I'm not sure it is especially significant with respect to social outcomes, and could even be an adv…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/20 08:57 AM
3

This study is interesting because it tries to control for lots of variables, because it needs to. We find that the upward grade changes were near zero when the student’s performance in a given class was better than her average performance in other classes. However, when the student’s grade in a class is below her average GPA, the propensity to receive an upward grade correction increases in the difference between the GPA and the class grade. Approximately 28-percent of administrative records wer…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/20 07:09 AM
9

Generally I think when MRAs talk about women being oppressed in 3rd world counties they are contrasting it to first world countries. I think I agree with your assessment. However, I would say it’s more accurate that everyone is oppressed "women are oppressed" is probably not the right phrase to use in this case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/20 09:57 PM
1

That's a really random-ass axiom. Usually these things are not taken as axioms, even something like "existence is meaningless" follows from things that actually are axiomatic, like empiricism, skepticism, some assertions concerning the reality (or unreality) of human perception, and a rejection of humanism (actually this last one is rarely axiomatic itself) . Those sorts of things can be axiomatic, but very few people take statements directly concerning the meaning of life as axiomatic, and for …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/20 06:47 PM
10

women had no say in any aspects of their lives. You sleep through history? My people used to be property Does this mean to you that you can't care about black men (or any other men for that matter) being denied access to their sons or imprisoned for being unable to pay their bills?
/r/MensRights05/08/20 10:39 AM
1

Hrm, you keep asserting this, but I can't see any reasoning behind it. You don't seem to like the belief, but if you seem convinced that it is true it seems to be the case without connection to any principled philosophy. Let me ask you this: If I were to assert that existence itself is extra, how would you deny it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/20 08:34 AM
2

zuccessful ;) The purpose of all living things is to reproduce. The more you do, the more biology sees you as a success. Biology has neither eyes nor ambition. That which exists is what comprises biology, and so biology selects for that which exists (and has continued to exist) -- as a matter of sheer tautology -- but that isn't "success" in a broader sense, only in the narrow sense of "being what comprises biology". Meaning is an underlying order, but existence could theoretically be without me…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/20 12:38 AM
2

You said earlier The purpose of my life has been unfulfilled but now you say biological purpose. Isn't this equating moral good with the status quo? Finding positive morality in the horror show that is human biology seems kinda nuts to me. Of course, I also subscribe to /r/antinatalism so perhaps I'm the one who's nuts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/20 11:23 PM
1

Aren't most transitions MtF? Underage transitions included? The rate of suicide of...girls in general is extraordinarily high. Oh.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 10:08 PM
1

I consider myself somewhat Nihilistic, yet I still stand with the left on the majority of issues because I like people, even if I don't like humanity. Philanthropic misanthropy, I can relate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/20 09:51 PM
3

IMO its the traditional position of leftists to not put much stake in a vote for the bipartisan consensus. If there is one statement that embodies the idea of leftist-ness it is "Things really don't have to be like this, not cosmetic changes, things really don't have to be like this." So I don't really see that thought process as antithetical to leftist thought. Care about what you care about, and take a view on how society ought to be given the constraints on human nature -- do not consider the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/20 08:20 AM
2

Indeed, all fcats should be undistorted. A good example of the UN doing contortions too.
/r/MensRights30/07/20 07:21 PM
1

Do kids doing this shit really deserve jail either way? Three seconds of nudity doesn't really seem that bad compared to some of the other bullying I've heard about in highschool. Society is sick, but I'm not sure that is a good reaction considering how much jail can change the trajectory of a kids life. Being expelled for that would be plenty.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 03:17 PM
4

Not really, don't speak German, haha. To be honest, I would enjoy hearing about specifically German mensrights issues in English, even if its just a machine-translated dump of comments from a /r/mensrights-but-in-German forum. Is Die Linke rabidly feminist? I don't really even know that much.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/20 05:08 AM
13

Wow, of all the folks in the MRM, this guy was one of the foremost on account of his tireless work in the legal system for the good of both individuals and men in general. Truly a champion of justice. God bless Marc Angelucci.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 04:04 AM
2

She rides a broom at night. Okay, okay, she's a politician I don't like. The Green New Deal is a grotesque homunculus of a proposal. She left the Bernie campaign over the Joe Rogan endorsement. She used a hurricane disaster to demonize white people as a group. She uses her political position to say random, stupid shit on social media.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/20 04:01 PM
0

Wow a surprisingly nice quote from that witch.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/20 07:12 AM
5

Oh, haha. Well, I guess it will be on deaf ears in the end and someone will get their AMR material. Still, a lot of the responses are good. I'd love to at least see her give a review of the Red Pill documentary.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 07:07 AM
1

There is real damage that can be done by bad role models, and proper respect does need to be taught to people. But this usually isn't discussed on this sub, because the discussion point of this sub isn't how to make better men, but addressing the dangers and legal situation of men. That is to say, this sub is about advocacy. Male advocates do advocacy and counteracting bad role models is not well described by the word "advocacy". This line of justification fails from the start. But it gets worse…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/20 10:52 PM
1

Young men are being given messages that will either hurt them or lead to them hurting others. Isn't that important to the sub? You really want this: I don’t want young men hearing the justification for [FedMyster's] actions and making the stereotype about awkward men into a self-fulfilling prophecy just so a predator can get a pass. to be the connection between your post and the subreddit's topics? Come on man, you're better than that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/20 10:13 PM
3

Okay, so there's a large consent speech here. This is weird, because you don't really seem bother to link it to anything concretely relevant to the sub, its just what it is. And its a weird consent speech because it only mentions ambiguous consent in passing but does talk about non-reactions. And there's this bit in the middle that's out of place: It’s actually offensive to me how this is being spun as someone just not knowing how to approach women. The line is: “I mean, aren’t you an awkward gu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/20 09:24 PM
1

Nowadays, when I am in an exclusively male group, I get uncomfortable because I think that we must have done something wrong by not being inclusive enough and not creating the right atmosphere that would be inviting for women. Now that's Sons of Feminism material for you. Do you think we should encourage men to create more male-only spaces again? Sports are still a thing. Male only religious groups for studying scripture still exist, Men's Sheds are a thing. As for creating more male-only spaces…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/20 08:49 PM
18

Not only can you be a male advocate and oppose sexual identity politics, but this sub is officially egalitarian for precisely the reason you state in your first paragraph.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/20 08:45 PM
2

Firstly, let's say that advocating for murder is bad. Okay, but let's say that "kill all men" doesn't mean that. I would say that "kill all men" is fundamentally about declaring men guilty as a group. If you look at the posts, that's why they're saying "kill all men", its because of X thing that men/a man did. Okay, but let's say that "kill all men" doesn't mean that. I would say that "kill all men" is an unhealthy expression of rage. Even if that sort of thing has its place, that place is a sup…
/r/MensRights06/07/20 02:41 AM
1

If there's evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, he'll be judged as guilty I agree, but that evidence should not include the testimony of someone who has lied to the court. If the child did jail time for the prior lie, and if there's a clean-record-as-adult statute, then sure, but that's not the reasoning being used to exclude the lie. In this case though, only "most of" the 12 false accusations are a decade old, so I'm not sure if that is in fact contained to when she was a minor.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 10:48 PM
13

I used to disagree with Paul Elam when he said he'd never convict someone of a rape charge if he was on the jury. Now...now I'm not so sure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/20 08:30 PM
1

"Social majority/minority"? WTF. We are talking about sex, which is roughly split 50/50. "Socially privileged" is a somewhat better wording. As for women in general being socially privileged, that is a strange way to look at it IMO. In general, people are fairly equal when they are of similar social class or at least that seemed to be the case before MeToo happened. The large differences begins to happen when life starts going really well...or really poorly. The things at the end of the bell cur…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/20 08:19 PM
21

I was like... WTF? So I say, "what does what's going on among 50 to 70 year olds in the top 1 tenth of 1% of the population have to do with how boys are doing in elementary school?" She says, "well, men are still dominant." I said, "those male CEOs were boys in elementary school 40 to 60 years ago. It matters because patriarchy theory is guilt by blood. The elementary school boys are part of the same "collective" as the CEOs and therefore share in the same guilt.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/20 07:44 PM
6

a man and a woman takes many forms, a black person takes many forms, whiteness takes many forms and there is no one way to do it. ...for me to outsource all of my issues to sole white supremacy is to give it too much power, and for me to outsource all of my issues as a woman to men is a little bit too disempowered for me. Just as much as women are oppressed by patriarchy men are oppressed by patriarchy and I can't not see that. Honestly, I respect Akanbi for at least trying not to sound like a r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/20 03:44 AM
1

Nietzche would damn all who would seek justice only because he did not dare believe in it himself. Although I would agree that revenge is not much of a "justice" itself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/20 04:34 AM
5

More than implies, haha.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/20 09:35 PM
0

Jailing poor working white men for 50 yrs No one was jailed for 50 years. No, do not put vulnerable men in prison for minor offences like this. This wasn't one guy with a small amount of drugs in his car. This was organized crime trying to get people dependant on them -- them specifically. I suspect the vulnerability of nightclub managers is greatly overstated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/20 11:01 AM
0

That seems fine to me. Organized crime usually deals in a lot more than just drugs. The prison sentences are also more than reasonable, with most 2-3 years (there's also one in for 5, one for 6, and one for 4) likely only part of which will be spent in prison.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/20 08:48 AM
2

Blaming moderates ? not doing anything doesn't make a "moderate" it make you part of the problem. Perhaps, but my argument is that those who don't agree with you about justice are more of an issue than "apathy". I'll grant you the word "moderate" applies more to left/right politics than it does in the context of the MRM. If you don't side with the oppressed you are by default siding with the oppressor. We need to understand that and... Woah now. I'm more of an "everyone who isn't against us is f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/20 12:04 AM
3

It isn't really specifically male apathy. If one goes through the list of MRM issues, almost everything only applies to men who don't want to live the lifescript or who are disadvantaged. Even the transfer of wealth in marriage is a a benefit to many men, because it enables wealth as a means to romantic success. So I don't think it is right to wonder why "half of society" isn't interested in men's issues. Even concerning something that affects a broader group of men like paternity fraud it isn't…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/20 10:41 PM
2

Wow, instant citizenship. Not only is this fellow a hero, he actually avoids the old adage "no good deed goes unpunished".
/r/MensRights24/06/20 09:26 PM
3

is there not something wrong with the system when across the board men consistently are 6 times more likely then women to be imprisoned in their lifetime? No! If the collective choices of men across the board deserve imprisonment at a lifetime rate of 6x more, then there is nothing wrong with the system of imprisonment. The question is, what choices are driving that imprisonment and are those choices themselves the result of something that is wrong? It may be that those choices are the result of…
/r/MensRights24/06/20 08:59 PM
1

A saunter over to Wikipedia You've read the wikipedia article on the MRM, right? Wikipedia is a bad idea for anything political. Those women don't control BLM anymore than Alyssa Milano or Tarana Burke control the metoo movement. If it wasn't for your earlier comment, I'd read that as satire. Milano's might not control the metoo movement, but Milano's failings are typical of it. Care to point out some BLM leaders who don't act like that .com site?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/20 12:02 AM
1

The concepts around patriarchy and toxic masculinity are actually pretty sound Not at all! Patriarchy --> a traditionalist gender system that assigns certain roles to men and women No, this is not how the term is used. GeekFeminismWiki has a definition that is close to the motte version of how the term is used. Patriarchy is a term used in feminism to describe the system of gender-based hierarchy in society which assigns most power to men, and assigns higher value to men, maleness, and "masculin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/20 02:27 AM
2

The one post I found from the last week was painting BLM as a feminist movement It is. The .com of it has herstory (a play on "history" rather than a story about a particular "her"), and their what we believe page is...well, reading is believing. We build a space that affirms Black women and is free from...environments in which men are centered. Yeah. something I've never even heard anywhere and makes no sense (considering the whole movement is in response to the killing of men) You are right th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/20 02:05 AM
14

The woman may be a criminal, but there will always be criminals. The problem is not the criminal, but the system that aids, protects and seeks out those criminals to act on behalf of.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/20 01:57 AM
2

I don't know at all. What I do know is that full custody for a father is rare. What I suspect is that in family court a lot of things depends on whether the judge thinks well of you or your lawyer. If parental alienation be substantiated, perhaps that would help, or perhaps that would just piss off the judge. Even if parental alienation can be substantiated, it depends on the judge. Fred Hayward is a good example how that can go on right in front of the court and be ignored.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/20 05:27 AM
3

Could be true, but doesn't mean much to men's rights or male advocacy. "agree to the arrangement" likely includes all forms of settlement here. If so, it would be like saying that men who are imprisoned due to a plea "agree to the arrangement" of greater sentencing length. It ignores the reality of how courts work. Rather than saying anything about the courts, that statistic may well say more about how aggressive and/or conservative the opinions of men/women on whether they are likely to win or …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/20 05:01 AM
2

You can't convince someone by debunking their rationalizations. This triggers a defensive mechanism in people's brains, as you are attacking and attempting to dismantle their beliefs. It actually makes them believe more strongly in their existing beliefs. This is not true. People are more likely to act as if they believe more strongly in their existing beliefs, and people are more likely to look for further reasons to believe their belief is correct. However, that is not a strengthening of a per…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 11:55 PM
5

Your first study only looked at part-time work as secretaries & accountants. Part time and full-time work as secretaries and accountants, yes. The study itself doesn't list this in its introductory remarks for the same reason that the OP doesn't. Due to the sheer magnitude of the difference in callbacks, this isn't particularly important. The point the OP was making is concerning the researchers burying a salient finding that was not expected by them. Ironically it also says this: "the younger f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/20 12:48 AM
6

One study on hiring discrimination looked at the effects of marriage and parental status on a person's hiring prospects. They expected to find discrimination against women and against mothers specifically. What they found instead was that in every cohort, women were preferred over men... https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537119300429 That's his first study, right? It is exactly as he says on the tin.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/20 12:32 AM
14

Well "internalized misogyny" is a pretty piss poor, sexist term itself that is used with particular vitriol against female MRAs. It is also a pretty extreme form of hypoagency, which is something that egalitarians generally don't like. It makes a lot of sense that the term hasn't gotten a lot of traction amoung male advocates.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/20 02:49 AM
2

Ah. I think feminists are split as to whether the term is supposed to indict masculinity as a whole. Or rather, that the term was intended to unify both those who want it to mean that and those who don't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/20 07:21 PM
2

The name was created by mythopoietic culture at first, and it wasn't intended to be derogatory. What? The mythopoetic folks created it as a term of othering. It absolutely was intended to be derogatory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/20 05:16 PM
1

Sure, terminology drift extends masculinity (and to an extent by extension maleness) to "the state of being male-like", which can make sense in context. What you are doing here is trying to tie off being male from being similar to being male in a word that was designed to talk about the former and not the latter. This: masculinity is a social category of behavior This is wrong. Masculinity as a term is firstly and foremost being male, and being male-like is an extension of it. Trying to pretend …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/20 05:12 PM
9

Beautiful sources.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/20 04:00 PM
3

Masculinity is not the same as maleness Dear goodness no. Masculinity and maleness are both "the state of being male". The difference -ity and -ness is largely stylistic in nature, for instance one wouldn't talk about "blackity" but rather "blackness" To quote a rando on the internet: The difference is that '-ity' can't be added to just anything. It is usually confined to adjectives of Latin or Romance derivation (although there are possibly exceptions -- English has always had its share of mixi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/20 04:26 AM
7

Until the sentiment that generated the feminist #metoo is utterly destroyed, there is no hope of having a substantial proportion of male teachers in the future. But that's just the painfully obvious. The demonization of male existence as fundamentally dangerous (and particularly dangerous to children) has been an object of feminism for decades at least. The environment in which teachers are trained and accredited is not merely feminist, but rabidly so, and you and I are likely both aware of the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/20 04:16 AM
8

A win scenario is equality in the criminal justice system. Getting around the present feminist lobby is an eventual necessity for this on multiple levels. A win scenario is equality in child custody. Getting around the present feminist lobby is an eventual necessity for this on multiple levels. A win scenario is equality in divorce. Getting around the present feminist lobby is an eventual necessity for this on multiple levels. A win scenario is moving past affirmative action for the majority. Ge…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/20 03:39 AM
5

a lot of the MRM's perception of what constitues activism begins and ends with...fighting with feminism It should. Take a look at a men's issues list sometime. Most of those issues cannot progress without overcoming feminism in one way or another.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/20 02:11 AM
9

It...isn't unsuccessful? Peterson went from calling MGTOW weasels to advocating rather strongly against feminism. The NCFM has a large and growing list of victories for equal rights. Just now there was major campus reform. MGTOW itself has been wonderfully successful as a sort of activism even while eschewing the same. There seems to be something deep in masculinity that hinders pro-male advocacy. A "strong man" attitude... This is just feminist terminology pervading the discussion space. This i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/20 02:02 AM
2

I think part of the issue might be "spam". One or two users posting 5 posts a day in a sub that averages 10 is a bit much. One of the less common rules I've most appreciated from /r/RWBY is the following: Users can make three posts, per category [fan art and discussion being the main two categories for this purpose], per day, with a mandatory wait time of three hours between posts of the same type, as determined by flair category. If you wish to post multiple images, make an Imgur album rather t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/20 05:24 PM
1

Why was it removed? It seems the removal just validated his statement. All such topics are megathreaded on that sub. For the justification, read the sidebar (seriously folks, sidebars are great): Some topics are so popularly discussed that were we to allow them as regular posts on the subreddit, you would see little to nothing else. As such, we confine them to megathreads. At the top of the Hot section we have sticky'd a "Popular Topics Megahub". Inside you will find all the megathreads for the …
/r/MensRights10/05/20 05:11 PM
1

Well microtransactions were a thing for, what, 10 years before those started getting really regulated? Its awful, but I think pretty normal for this sort of exploitation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/20 04:32 PM
1

There's apparently no regulatory authority that tries to control exploiters like the person in question. I object somewhat to this characterization. There are a plethora. This kind of exploitation started getting made illegal way back when the first regulations on casinos were created. However, because encouraging someone to give money of their own free will -- and not in exchange for nothing, but for something worth less and a chance of something worth more -- because that is so fraught to pros…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/20 11:44 PM
1

I think this can be better discussed as a larger discussion of microtransactions and requesting gifts online from vulnerable whales. There are similar stories of drunk people getting financially decimated from microtransactions in video games, or children causing lawsuits between a game and parents. The difference of course is that the exploitation in this case is more measured and deliberate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/20 04:39 PM
2

You clearly don't know enough about the military, since as others have pointed out, some of the things you hope for are effectively impossible. Your dad should know better. Your mom shouldn't sound so much like a parody. So this is very /r/thathappened material. On top of that, to anyone else reading, if what I've heard about the US VA is remotely true, the US military chews people up and spits them out. And the morality of being in the US military is an extremely serious question. So I ask thos…
/r/MensRights05/05/20 02:02 PM
3

He does use feminists as the introductory example in video #6, The Ship of Theseus. I think the entire playlist is worth watching, but I'd say that other than Never Play Defense (the one I linked to) Control the Conversation and Mainstreaming are the tactics most relevant to what Pinkpillers are doing. Death of a Euphemism is also relevant... The playlist buries common concepts with obscure bullshit. His examples range from great to piss poor, and his description of the actual concepts ranges fr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/20 02:04 AM
3

This video itself is a scam rhetorical tactic. It is highly inadvisable to take the word of a scammer like this and use that to try to identify scams. Lets dig in: And the purpose of rebranding white supremacy with a term like alt-right is so mainstream white people are not made to feel like racists when they vote for racist people with racist policies. So, every time a journalist writes an article about the dapper fashions of the alt-right and doesn't title it "Lipstick on a White Supremacist P…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/20 03:39 PM
4

Funny, but does this post really belong here?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/20 02:40 PM
8

Wow, what scaaaary music. male early death, suicide, burnout at work, stress related diseases -- you're very much open to these things. To the extent that early death, burnout, and stress help create things that are personally meaningful, and also create order, it does not seem to be a bad thing to be open to these things insofar as one is also open towards life itself. It should be noted that Elam is very much fighting important causes of all of the listed items -- such as divorce -- for no oth…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/20 02:35 PM
1

Its less images and more discussion mainly, so I've been enjoying it, but also has a political bent to it.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 04:23 PM
5

“In situations where we had those nontraditional symptoms or a ‘rub dirt on it and walk it off’ kind of attitude, they were perceived as less depressed People who try to seem less depressed are perceived as less depressed, news at 11. This shit sounds silly when it isn't hidden by language like "traditional...symptoms" A top comment from r/science/ looks for this more directly in the study where it sounds more obvious and slightly less silly: For those asking about "traditional depressive sympto…
/r/MensRights25/04/20 10:13 PM
9

I’m a woman so I won’t comment on this specifically but I think there is something analogous in hearing people say similar sorts of statements about white people. As a white person when I hear this I have the initial reaction of feeling attacked and thinking that this person is making an unfair blanket statement. ...The reason that it isn’t an unfair blanket statement as I initially felt is that racism is a system - it requires participation from a large swath of society in order to function. So…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/20 12:31 AM
1

I don't think it is fair to qualify Pizzey of ever being a feminist. That's fair. I mentioned her because she said something that happened to be against feminist dogma -- even though that dogma was weird and false and is no longer accepted -- and feminists went after her brutally in their communities for it. But she isn't a feminist, so I should have listed someone else.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 04:19 AM
2

Much of my life I was mostly ignorant of feminism. There are some crazies. Sarkeesian, of course. But "most" of them are reasonable-ish people, right? Well eventually I went and looked up Cassie Jaye's documentary. And I realized that all of the feminists I'd talked to had omitted a lot of rather important things. Moreover, a little checking showed that yes, the feminist authorities were every bit the radfem wingnuts that they were in the film and morso (Binx excluded).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/20 10:42 PM
1

Specifically the claim is that "It's not against the rules (of that subreddit) to criticize specific feminist-oriented positions or policies" Bwahaha.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/20 10:20 PM
3

It is criminal, the default is beyond reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 10:15 PM
1

1. What is Men's rights activism? Activism for men's issues. What is a men's issue? Things that substantially negatively affect men specifically or disproportionately. This is one list, but it is not complete. 2. What are Men's Rights ideologies? Broadly speaking that there are some men suffering from injustice and that those injustices have significance. Further ideology is not held universally. However, some common terms that may make up a worldview of gender relations are "male disposability"…
/r/MensRights23/04/20 12:57 AM
1

Hey, at least your leader closed with China.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 10:56 AM
1

Look brother, I get that you have a lot of passion about this but when men get passionate, most of the time it's interpreted as dangerous aggression. To be effective, LWMA men need to project extremely high self-control. You can try to play the game of Simon Says if you like, but there is no way forward by doing that. It will be interpreted as dangerous aggression regardless. Being passionate is fine, society can at least learn to accept passion anonymously on the internet. Look at how he mainta…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/20 08:07 PM
3

I don't know, suicide it's a pretty selfish act in the first place Actually, "being a burden" is a common reason for suicide, especially for suicides of the elderly. Sometimes it is a selfish act, but sometimes it isn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/20 10:10 PM
1

And they never present any evidence for that being the case. Actually it was demonstrated specifically for firearms. The disparity does not exist for hanging, however.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/20 10:09 PM
1

You're not supposed to make a headline a question unless the answer is no, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/20 10:04 PM
1

Women in patriarchal societies have historically been unable to live independent of males (husbands, brothers, fathers, and sons) due to patriarchal systems Uh, men and women being unable to live independant of each other is not due to patriarchal systems. This is kinda...uh. Well. You do know where babies come from, right? Women...patriarchal systems disallowing then from equal right to life, education, equal access to healthcare/reproductive care, equal entry into professional fields, equal pa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/20 08:33 PM
1

Anthropologist Laila Williamson notes that it “has been practiced on every continent and by people on every level of cultural complexity, from hunter gatherers to high civilizations, including our own ancestors. The practice of infanticide. Not gendered infanticide. Read your sources. Female infanticide is a separate issue and is mentioned separately in your very own source. So can you explain why the statement that female infanticide had and /or does occur in the following regions: China, South…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/20 08:08 PM
1

Exactly how am I being colonialist? Because you are pompously comparing men and women in divergent cultures without looking at how the cultures treat women, much less men. You are demanding cultures change to mirror western feminism, but you don't even know what those cultures are. Here you are saying cultures devalue women because "women have been victims of acid attacks for fucking up dinner." but in fact Pakistani culture (I'm going to harp on that) would tend towards being disgusted at how w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/20 06:57 PM
0

I would absolutely love for men to do this. I wouldn't! I don't like unnecessary death/suffering, thanks. I know, I know, but still.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/20 10:58 AM
-1

Because otherkin is something that must be taken seriously. Yeaaaaaaah, maybe not.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 08:45 AM
1

They got data from the annual volume of the World Health Statistical Annual (WHO 1973) for the murder rates by sex and age for all nations of the world reporting to the World Health Organization with populations over one million. The male/female sex ratio was 3.80 for all murder victims but only 1.31 for babies. ... So the poorer and more patriarchal the country, the more infant boys are killed relative to infant girls. "Interestingly, it looks as if economic and social progress is accompanied b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/20 08:12 AM
1

India, Pakistan, China, Southeast Asian countries, and African Countries who live under these gender norms constitute a majority of the world. They are not represented well to the public in 1st world countries. Missed this when I first replied. While this diverges completely from the infanticide discussion, lumping all these countries in a single bunch with one set of gender norms. How much more insensitive, colonialist can you get? The sheer irony in saying that these cultures are not represent…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/20 12:41 AM
1

I agree with mostly all of this except for the strict definition of “worth” being monetary value. Ah, then we agree. I'm not talking about the definition of worth being monetary in nature, I'm saying that the way female infants are considered "worth less" is not an ontological sort of worth. The practice skews greatly towards poverty, and is related to material concerns, not broader cultural ideas of worth. Some women have been victims of acid attacks for fucking up dinner. I mean, it is certain…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 11:18 PM
1

However the legislation was something men enacted on the basis of puritanical populism This brand of puritanical populism was driven by a women's movement (strong overlap with the suffragettes, but distinct), opposed by the majority of men, and brought to fruition in no small part by an interesting sort of political corruption (many of the politicians who enacted it seemed dubiously in favor of it). Read up. Not because of DV and financial ruin/debt/poverty. No, these reasons did not drive the w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 10:36 PM
1

Okay, so here is a pretty famous example of you being incorrect that women leaders didn’t have a role or purpose on the front lines of battle equivalent to their male peers. English. Read it. This may have had something to do with not being expected to risk their necks on the battlefield like kings. -- even though they have historically made every attempt to fight and die beside men Haha, no. There are many instances of brave women who have stood beside men, but the history is not so noble. The …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 10:00 PM
1

I am, in fact, read up on this topic. "Worth less" in this context means worth less in monetary value. That is to say a male child is required to provide for his mother, whereas a girl must be monetarily supported by her mother (the cultural value is the converse!). This is not internalized oppression, rather it the externalized effect of affirmative action done badly. People don't want to deal with it when they have to provide special consideration for someone. Now this is driven further by sex…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 09:17 PM
1

Female rulers were more likely to be challenged. Source The discussion is rulers, not supervisors. Queens wouldn't receive challenges for remotely the same reasons, as their authority could obviously be demonstrated in the same fashion as a King's: swift and potentially final retribution at the hands of their officers. Queens were more likely to wage war than kings This may have had something to do with not being expected to risk their necks on the battlefield like kings. This doesn't demonstrat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/20 11:43 PM
0

Yes. That's a thing. But the post is about the narrative of oppression driven by feminists. Feminists defend sex-selective abortion so that isn't really part of the narrative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/20 11:34 PM
2

Probably lol, but you'd have to actually do so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/20 11:27 PM
2

For the record, /u/Phollie is coming from an honest place. Honest, but taught a revisionist history that has its purpose in justifying blood-guilt retribution against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/20 11:26 PM
2

human trafficking Actually 94% are boys Lol what? Your source is about children detained by the authorities (for instance, as a result of a criminal proceeding). /u/phollie provides the correct link.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/20 11:16 PM
2

/r/watchwatchredditdiedie
/r/MensRights09/04/20 09:52 AM
1

If you are genuine in your intention and not simply trying to name-call then I'll tell you where I think we disagree. ...I understand they are harmful, I think they are harmful because they violate one's right to control what happens to their body. I cannot think of another term that encapsulates what I think. Oh dear, I don't think you understand what I was getting at. I definitely disagree with you considering violations of bodily autonomy as harms in and of itself. And I definitely was confus…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/20 03:14 AM
2

shows that you see men's rights types as an enemy, and only support men's rights when they enable feminist dogma. Woah now, /u/PrincessOfPatriarchy may have done more for the MRM (and that against feminist dogma, not like that sub) than I have. and trying to derail with allegations of personal attacks instead To be fair, while the thrust of my point certainly wasn't as personal as it seems to have been taken, I did write the post(s) in such a way as to provoke as strong of a reaction as possible…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/20 06:01 PM
1

I think she'll be sentenced to something IF she gets charged. Judges in the US are elected, which can influence verdicts. In this case, her getting off scott free would be a reputation issue.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 07:43 AM
2

As a quick side note: To be fair to them, they are correct as far as the most severe form of FGM goes. A full removal of the clitoris will have a more severe impact on sexual pleasure than a circumcision will. But not an emasculation. Nor is introcision worse than subincision. They aren't correct because they are only capable of establishing this meaning by removing the practices from their context and shifting them around the world in a strange sort of shell game. -- Feminists are offended by t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/20 05:28 AM
8

Phyllis Schlafly Yep. That one was a problem. Meanwhile feminists tend to have much more understanding of the history-given they were the ones who cared to record it What? Feminists did write polemic about history, but feminist history is so twisted it isn't consistent with actual historical records.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/20 12:39 AM
1

No you didn't? You stated that I don't believe circumcision is about bodily autonomy. I did not state that! You quoted what I said. How am I misrepresenting myself by using a different analogy? I think circumcision is wrong...so if they think circumcision is wrong too we are not in disagreement? Because your analogy doesn't follow through with the conclusion that you want influence your interlocutor to draw. You're creating an agreement that is ephemeral based on withholding your belief. It's a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/20 12:18 AM
1

It's interesting that you can type out my username and still misgender me I did think of that, and it is funny, but "he" is an appropriate default for pseudonymous usernames on the net, otherwise I'd be misgendering a lot of anime nerds. It's a risky guess to say "she". And don't bother to tag me while you talk about me. Of course. I'm not saying anything different to tripper than I said directly to you, there's no need to annoy you about it, that'd be cruel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 11:40 PM
3

It's certainly a place to check, but it's hard to find men's groups for violence without something in specific categories (domestic, ptsd, etc.). So if it doesn't exist as such for the larger group that is men, I would doubt that such a thing would exist for a group like FtM specifically. Think more about what other sorts of categories the violence you're looking for a support group for fits into and search again on that, or post broad strokes here if you're on some sort of throwaway account.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 07:21 AM
3

Ah, I see. Now you ask me what my beliefs are instead of just telling me what to think and calling me a liar. I correctly interpreted what you thought, though. I made a statement about what you thought that was correct, because it wasn't a stretch. Furthermore, it is perfectly possible for me to both say that circumcision is a bodily autonomy issue and that it is severely harmful You are misrepresenting yourself to the people you are talking to to claim that you agree with them when you do not. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 06:48 AM
10

sexism vs sexually motivated discrimination Haha, ran into the "privilege" redefinition did you? Yeah, it's hard to understand people when they are taught to evade being understood.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 06:21 AM
3

He's just using vocabulary the audience understands. His audience clearly doesn't understand his vocabulary though as I lined out. He's trying to demonstrate "agreement" by using phrases that have definition mismatch between MRAs and feminists and claim that they have some sort of agreement. Now that isn't to say that there is no agreement, no two people can completely disagree about a topic if for no other reason than that they share a common language (otherwise they couldn't disagree at all), …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 06:16 AM
4

Excuse me, but I am not lying. You're just "leaving things out". Oh yes, it's not lying, that's completely different. When you say "Some feminists believe..." you may mean "most of the important feminists", but your interlocutor believes you said "a few insignificant feminists". You don't believe circumcision is merely a bodily autonomy issue. And yes, I do believe circumcision is a bodily autonomy issue. But you don't believe it's merely a bodily autonomy issue, do you? You believe its actually…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 05:36 AM
6

I had to modify my language on some issues to avoid getting derailed. For instance, I would talk about circumcision as a bodily autonomy issue and did not make any mention or comparisons to FGM...But by never bringing it up as a comparison, all of us were able to get on the same page. Lying is a great way to persuade people, but it isn't a great way to have people actually work with you as partners. You don't believe circumcision is merely a bodily autonomy issue. Nor is denying circumcision sol…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 05:11 AM
3

Ideally we should support brands of feminism that are "friendly" towards men. Absolutely, equity feminism is great. Oh, you meant coffee-shop feminism? No, that's hateful bullshit. There may be enough lay "true feminists" who really do support equality "Equality" within the framework of patriarchy theory is a bloodguilt-driven, enforced two-tier system. It's a gender supremacy movement, and while its laity are more moderate, they don't generally support equality. It isn't that they are lying abo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 04:41 AM
-2

If she says anything even VAGUELY threatening go to the police and get a protective order against her. This is a bad idea unless it looks absolutely certain that it's going to be a messy divorce. The best case is to be able to agree on almost everything so as to not waste tens of thousands of dollars between both spouses legal efforts. If it does get messy, then yes, aggressive is necessary, but being the first one to pull the trigger on that grenade isn't going to have as good of a result as co…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:26 AM
2

As noted in the other sub, sector growth/shrinkage is the more significant factor here. Similar to the auto-manufacturing-apocalypse for the US, men were more affected by that for obvious reasons.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/20 02:32 AM
2

There are far more real world reasons for Alberta's male employment crisis. I don't think this legislation contributes significantly to this issue. I think it does contribute significantly, but you are totally right about the employment shift being the main cause.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 02:30 AM
2

my intuition is that most anti-feminists are way less socially conservative and more gender egalitarian that the public figures you name, so this perception is wrong. Well the MRM tends massively towards egalitarianism, but we're small fry atm. So I'm not sure how wrong that perception is of anti-feminists. I may agree with you that the MRM can be derided as socon, but I think for the most part the allegation isn't merely that the MRM is socon, but that the MRM is trying to put women down as a w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/20 02:49 AM
1

The link seems to not really show what study it means. I'll be looking at this one. A cross-sectional national survey of general surgery residents administered with the 2018 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination assessed mistreatment, burnout (evaluated with the use of the modified Maslach Burnout Inventory), and suicidal thoughts during the past year. We used multivariable logistic-regression models to assess the association of mistreatment with burnout and suicidal thoughts. Not ba…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/20 02:24 AM
1

IS VERY OBVIOUS THAT WOMEN ARE LESS LIKELY TO WANT TO BE IN THE MILITARY THAN MEN Well, I'm not sure I would say obvious, but yeah, it is more likely, the problem is that if women were even 25% as likely as men to apply for the military, you'd see an increase in military participation in women. The mere fact that it is increasing does not even suggest any discrimination. And I completely expect more women to be applying to military service positions today as opposed to 20 years go. So the increa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/20 01:50 AM
2

Conclusion: THE US MILITARY HAS THE DIEVERSIITYYY AND INCLOOSSIONN BULLSHIT TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST MEN Reasonable conclusion, horrible, horrible reasoning. You can't tell that from those stats.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/20 12:45 AM
2

The timeline shows numbers since 2000 to 2017 to 2018 what are you talking about Oh, I just saw the graphic at the top-right and thought that was what you were talking about
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/20 12:17 AM
2

Oh my god this is ACTIVE DUTY not overseas troops Yes, and? If you're on active duty you could be sent, and there's little you can do to stop it. Not everyone is willing to risk that. just admit men are being discriminated against Just substantiate that you're statistic is the result of an invidious action rather than the result of more innocuous choices or coincidence. It's not like a male-only draft or anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/20 11:43 PM
2

An increase of 0.3% in a single year is a whole lot, to be sure (though ideally I'd go through the last 7 years to see what the normal amount of noise is in that number, they've only got two years of that available [EDIT: noise seems to be about 0.2%, so the '17-'18 change is actually essentially noise]). But that could be caused by a number of factors, such as women being more willing to risk being sent to combat, rather than discrimination against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/20 11:37 PM
2

the data i have only shows population not applies IS STILL OBVIOUS DISCRIMINATION Care to unpack this? Are you saying you have data or that you don't (the sentence structure makes this unclear)? No systemic discrimination is obvious because no one can intuit the average experience of a population. Calling discrimination obvious very quickly lends itself to pay gap nonsense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/20 11:26 PM
2

What, in hard numbers, is the change from past years in the gender divide applying to be firefighters? It isn't much. And yes, there is more interest in women being firefighters in the most recent decade. Some of it is driven by sheer denial of the importance of physical strength in that job.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/20 10:13 PM
1

This is what most non-feminists think when they hear "anti-feminist" This isn't true. What most people think of when they think of "anti-feminist" is approximately Jordan Peterson or Ben Shapiro. Even before Peterson became the most prominent Canadian antifeminist that image of a conservative capitalist railing against victim-narratives and defending family (some interpret this as women-in-kitchens, many don't) is more or less what people would think of as an antifeminist. And that image isn't n…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/20 10:02 PM
1

That "male declining" is happening in male dominated fields does not itself demonstrate discrimination, and may suggest the opposite. I don't see how I'm supposedly justifying discrimination against men. Enlighten me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/20 08:33 PM
2

Agreed, wow. I mean, I do think that feminists have serious issues making logical arguments for some of the basic points, but "incapable of making intellectual/logical arguments"? Nononono, that is self-evidently untrue. It doesn't help that the way that's worded means that a feminist would be incapable of making an intellectual/logical argument about something other than feminism, which is well into pants-on-head territory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/20 08:31 PM
3

Extremists. The loudest voices of any movement are often the ones heard by the general public, and those voices aren't always pretty... Paul Elam has done a wonderful job of subverting this and I really appreciate him for it. There are more extreme voices out there, but he is the one who has taken that position and has grounded himself firmly in a strong egalitarian position.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/20 08:26 PM
5

Nice explanation! A point of disagreement though: Then some parts of men's movement historically either were, or were perceived to be anti-feminist Not were, are. Even Warren Farrell opposes patriarchy theory. There are very few people in the MRM that are not at least a little antifeminist, and very few antifeminists who aren't a little in the MRM. You can see that some of the revered feminist authors acknowledged this problem in the past, but nothing systematic came out of it: The author Bell H…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/20 08:18 PM
1

Seriously male dominated fields, MALE DECLINING WHILE FEMALE RISING Really? This may well be interpreted as a step towards equality. Also, a modicum of grammar would be nice. In the posts i link of millitary What?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/20 08:13 PM
3

It's false. Some rape is about power, but a lot of rape is about sex. The idea that "rape is primarily about power" is clearly not universal, considering at minimum the goings on of the age of sail. But looking closer at rape definitions clearly shows how highly limited that statement is. "Rape is about power" necessitates a narrow focus on violent rape or rape with a weapon or blackmail. But most things today considered rape are not well described with the above. In fact, given that teaching wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/20 12:22 PM
3

3 - Modern feminism however is NOT about men vs women. Two huge mistakes. Firstly modern feminism isn't substantially different from fourth/first wave feminism for the purposes of your writeup. Secondly, feminism is about women vs men. Every wave of feminism has needed to promote a lie about men in general being against women in order to justify itself.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 12:23 AM
9

The baby's mother was not charged with statutory rape as OP's title indicates What do you think Criminal charges had been brought against Hermesmann by Shawnee County, Kansas, accusing her of "engaging in the act of sexual intercourse with a child under sixteen" means?
/r/MensRights29/03/20 08:18 PM
1

I definitely have. It's can be thought of as a lack of chivalry, of course this is going to be a thing from men.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 08:12 PM
1

The average Nigerian male is oppressed by his government and society. So are the women. However, this average Nigerian male goes home to oppress his wife...The face of female oppression in Nigeria is a man. It is not every man, but it calls out the men directly and indirectly involved in female oppression. Do you see the picture I'm trying to paint here? Oh, I see it, I see it quite plainly. This is not a picture I'm unfamiliar with. It's what the hateful radfems say of men in the west, almost w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/20 03:38 AM
9

Written by a very bad listener. "Focus on looking like you're listening, don't bother to process the information or its implications."
/r/MensRights27/03/20 11:56 PM
1

And she said the bottom 3 are men vs men...What would your response be. Men are involved in almost every men's rights issue. Child custody? Most judges are male. DV law? most politicians are male. Saying "oh, but men do these things" as if that is abnormal or changes anything...isn't that sexist? Then she asked what action does the mra take to prevent it. First of all, there is more than one MRA. I know, MRAs seem like Borg sometimes, but we're really not. Second of all the bottom three things a…
/r/MensRights27/03/20 08:32 PM
2

Well, they can still likely hide behind university lawyers, just the punishment they receive won't be a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 08:18 PM
2

The father is hermetically sealed too, he has announced he will debunk a yet unseen list of studies. Hermetically? Announcing that one will debunk unseen studies is a challenge that presumes the possibility that one may be unable to. "I'll take all comers" is an assertion that no one will beat you in a competition, but expresses a desire to test that belief. So it isn't an expression of bone-headedness or an inability to have one's mind changed, quite the opposite. For a feminist and a Petersoni…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/20 08:11 PM
1

As much as I think engaging in ideas is good. I'd personally agree with that advice because it's clear both people are engaging in team based arguments and identification. I think this is pretty bullshit. Obviously engaging infinitely over an issue is a bad idea. However, if one isn't willing to even look for studies or data or common logic on an issue and present it for review -- if one isn't even willing to go that far for a critical belief -- why should that belief be held at all!? Debate or …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/20 07:58 PM
1

Because at the end of the day I recognize that people are scum. It doesn't matter what label they identify under. They will take it and fit it to their own hateful narrative. This is very true, and a good rejoinder to the thrust of my previous comment. I would under different circumstances further argue beyond my previous comment that the who's who of the purveyors of the hateful narrative suggests that this isn't merely a feminist faction, but what feminism was designed for (indeed how many fem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/20 09:33 AM
1

Now you might not believe these things can happen in modern societies, but this is our every day reality. Oh I believe it. Horrific male genital mutilation is still a thing in Australia, to say nothing of circumcision in the US. And don't get me started on divorce court or police response to domestic violence. We can now vote Excellent. The history of women's suffrage movements in Nigeria though they copied some of the means of the western movements is much, much cleaner than the history of of s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/20 02:28 AM
1

You want me to list the good the feminists movement have done for women? Yes! If you can't see it there's no point is there? It isn't that there is nothing there, but that it isn't what you think. For instance, feminism was opposed to universal suffrage and fought it the US. Feminists blocked and are presently preventing the change of the definition of rape to include as possible victims men and male kids in India. Feminism, rather than make women equal in male-spaces of the workplace which was …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/20 08:05 PM
4

Being for free healthcare AND education likely makes him more left than you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/20 05:06 AM
2

I believe that economics is largely a matter of social agreement. The key factor in the success of an economic system is that people believe in cooperation as a result. Economics imposed from the top can create extraordinarily bad results due to noncoperation. I suspect noncooperation with the present economic realities are getting worse as people become disillusioned with the idea of hard work as a path to success or that any substantial part of society is doing something "meaningful". An econo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/20 02:25 AM
1

Eh, without being seeing your post it is difficult to tell if that mod's question was getting at something you were saying or not. He removed it as part of that exchange. It is totally reasonable to believe that some things are immoral even as acts of self-harm. In fact, this is more common than not. This is common in utilitarianism for certain purposes, but not the one under discussion and I could see a natural-law ethicist taking a strong view that humiliation of that sort is evil. In the case…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/20 01:28 AM
2

Oh, by the way, it got deleted as predicted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/20 10:36 PM
2

It seems from what I gathered on their view that any limits on abortion were oppressive. And this aspect of feminist orthodoxy is clearly cult-like. Anyone trying to make an apologetic for this must acknowledge there is no one philosophical basis for saying something or someone is or isn't an ethical consideration.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 12:46 PM
1

I know the good feminism has done. List it. Source your list. I've heard too many times feminist claim they've done something only to find out they opposed the very thing they claim to have achieved. Only to say, don't expect respect when you show disrespect. Perhaps. So what kind of respect do you show to the people who say that you can't get raped because you're a man and that someone who rapes a man should not be treated as a rapist? Or the people who deliberately tried to hide male victims o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/20 12:30 PM
1

Imagine if women had to purchase an engagement ring, ask for their partners parents permission then go to all this effort Both Dowry and Bride Price are traditions that have existed in various societies into the present day. The expense isn't a matter of subjugation for sure.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 11:37 AM
2

What has the mrm done to affect policy? Fought feminists on domestic violence policy to get the government to enforce existing law. Feminists fought it all the way, appealing every court decision. The existing law? Government funded shelters must supply some form of aid regardless of gender (or race, or other protected classes). The result: an abused man got a hotel voucher instead of having to fend for himself (and now all abused men can get this). The NCFM is great. The gendered draft in the U…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 06:03 AM
1

'rightism' Conservatism.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 08:38 AM
1

Inherently? I don't think so.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 08:38 AM
6

This makes a pretty horrible manifesto: it doesn't clearly communicate a vision for the future, policy or goals. It has an okaish list of grievances (confusingly labeled "principles") that could be neat as a separate thing to sketch out in a terse and somewhat digestible manner some of the more tangible injustices to be discussed, but it doesn't put forth the grievances in a diplomatic way, or define them well, and uses inconsistent language from item to item. This is a serious issue for a type …
/r/MensRights22/03/20 08:24 AM
3

Third, a man is more likely to be killed by a stranger I thought a man is still more likely to be killed by someone known to him, he's simply not as likely to be killed by someone known to him as a woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/20 07:15 PM
2

So a person who has one political opinion publicly can't have a tangentially related opinion publicly? No. The MRM is a movement and by virtue of being a movement doesn't have a leader able to control what the movement is and is about in the same way the leader of an organization does. Elam is wrong about this, on his personal facebook page no less. Whoop-dee-do. I think he's pretty clear that he has more personal investment in the MRM and other MRM-leaders than he does conservatism and conserva…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/20 05:36 AM
1

Okay, so this is so far from being a roast you need some reculturing: A roast is a form of humor in which a specific individual, a guest of honor, is subjected to jokes at their expense, intended to amuse the event's wider audience. Such events are intended to honor a specific individual in a unique way. Roasts aren't something you shame someone with, so its strange to call something posted in opposition to Swift a roast, because a roast would be in support of Swift. I realize that aspect of the…
/r/MensRights14/03/20 08:53 AM
4

Discouraging? The performance gap doesn't need to be closed. As I said, some of it has been hypothesized to be biological and if that is true (and I believe that is true to at least an extent) that makes the gap effectively immutable. The gap is relatively small. Being from a slightly more involved or slightly wealthier family will have far more of a difference on a boy's life than his gender. It is worth addressing some of the injustice that causes the gap, but I'd like to think that as someone…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 09:46 PM
2

That one is probably what should be used instead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 09:34 PM
2

Boys are more likely to have learning disabilities, speech impediments (source), reading disabilities, autism, and of course, ADHD (diagnosis varies by country). Girls fare better than boys in all school subjects, including math and science, and contrary to popular belief, this is not new but has been happening for a century or so (part of the reason for the belief that girls don't do as well in science is due to a focus only on test scores). This has been hypothesized to be related a lot to ear…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 09:26 PM
6

Amazing article. One caveat I offer up for discussion however is that this is all extremely good advice for persuading feminists persisting in their feminism, but often in a debate that is precisely what one doesn't want to do and that changes things a bit. For instance, it is not okay to hold someone accountable for something they didn't do, but often liberal feminists play a little game off of radical feminists with phrases like "patriarchy", "toxic masculinity" or "the future is female", whic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/20 08:09 PM
1

like we actively say women shouldn't even be in the work place I didn't say anything remotely like that, why don't you point out what I did say? we Who's "we"?
/r/MensRights10/03/20 04:25 PM
1

Women don't outnumber men in higher education in places of higher education relevant to employabillity by a long shot where men are much more concentrated on that criteria. Actually, university's relevance to employability has been decreasing for a while now, while the price has been going up. This makes university more useful for those who don't need to focus on financial success. The reason women outnumber men in higher education is because men and women make different life choices. There are …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/20 05:25 AM
1

Would've been nicer to stack them instead of all post them as separate top-levels.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/20 05:15 AM
2

Nah, was fun.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:31 AM
1

(YY)YYDDMM for easier sorting. YYYYMMDD Oh, my confusion was entirely typo-related.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:21 AM
1

Not at all, but that date format isn't meant to be used with an alphanumeric sort. If you want an alphanumeric sort to give you chronological dates, the format is and has always been yyyymmdd. Using the more arcane yyyyddmm mostly just makes the former more dangerous to use. Using ddmmmyyyy takes advantage of human readability and simultaniously the fact that computers can sort by date. When it comes to filesystems, you can use created date, but in most other contexts you actually just tell the …
/r/MensRights09/03/20 10:29 PM
1

My computer (english) will sort left-to-right, so the days will be sorted as a more significant digit than the months, which makes it only semi-chronologically. I'm not sure I get it yet.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 10:01 PM
0

What? Why? How does that sort them usefully?
/r/MensRights09/03/20 08:59 PM
2

To be fair, I've used the numerical sort properties of yyyymmdd myself on a couple occasions. But for the most part, people don't need to sort dates by number, you can just sort by date to the exclusion of sorting by number. It would indeed make sorting files easier, because sorting in the precise reverse order doesn't make human brains work that well (rather, that reverse is good for speaking/reading outside of a sorting context, because it's specific-first).
/r/MensRights09/03/20 11:29 AM
8

I mean, everyone should move to 08-Mar-2020 style dates. If using a monospace font every date is exactly the same length, it's readable by a human, and has no ambiguity.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 10:42 AM
1

Well, that's a word, haha.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 10:38 AM
2

In this scenario, these people are not true feminists. They fail to practice what they claim to identify with — feminism No true scotsman is alive and well in this day and age. Behold a textbook example. As if a random person on the internet can say what a true feminist is, as opposed to feminist academia or the largest feminist organization in the US and possibly the best funded feminist organization in the world.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 03:51 AM
1

What if the man emotes in a way that isn't "soft", or "feminine"? Also, this belongs in the meme subreddit.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 03:49 AM
1

Okay, relishing someone else's hypothetical prison rape is a bit beyond the pale, isn't it?
/r/MensRights09/03/20 03:41 AM
2

We don't know. Possibly, but quite possibly not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/20 10:20 AM
2

Well, better, of course, but there is a reading gap between boys and girls naturally, so while that helped reduce the gap, it was never expected to eliminate it. And there were also other things that Australia was doing to improve boys' education at the time, so it is hard to be absolutely sure what part of the change was due precisely to that policy change.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/20 10:08 AM
5

Severe disabilities? Change the definition of success. Provide monetary support. Governments tend to provide substantial sums, but even that is typically by no means ample. Minor disabilities can include tutoring or altering the format of the teaching. For instance, Australia moved back to a phonetic approach when it found that the other approach they developed was disadvantaging disadvantaged boys.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/20 02:29 AM
1

This study is coming out and saying that if you look at different variables (basically indicators as to whether they were good enough at science or math to pursue STEM) then you don't reach the same conclusion. Not at all, this study is by the authors of the original study correcting a few points, but not changing their overall conclusion (ie. a corrigendum).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/20 02:24 AM
1

Dude, this isn't pointing out the methodological faults with the original study. It is effectively an errata supporting the original conclusion. Stop confusing people. We also went over another criticism of the original study, which referenced this work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/20 02:21 AM
1

What is the most significant evil that metoo caused?
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:11 AM
1

If the current three are older its a larger issue, particularly for child support liability.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 07:04 PM
5

CALM is likely good, they post both feminist and non-feminist stuff on their website IIRC, but I think they do more stuff on the ground in the UK. Why is spunout bolded? "Know the Signs" is a California government thing from back when the "The Helpseeking Experiences of Men Who Sustain Intimate Partner Violence" research paper was written, I'm skeptical. It's not easy to google information about it or people's experiences with it because of terminology collision either. Similarly "Hub of Hope" a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/20 06:17 PM
2

People need to recognize that men have it harder than women. I completely disagree. Who has it worse is immaterial, and recognizing that or not is irrelevant to addressing injustice. The injustice of men's legal disadvantage in family court, criminal court, arrest policies etc. needs to end regardless of who is happiest at the end of the day.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 11:13 PM
3

Yes, this sub is broadly anti-feminist (though not entirely). That being said, any feminist who rejects common feminist terminology of "patriarchy" and "privilege" goes a long way to being egalitarian. What you may be missing is that privilege isn't just a concept that is hard to understand. It is racist and sexist and has been absolutely crucial to feminist theory since at least the Declaration of Sentiments (seriously, don't read over that link, click on it). It is based on imputing the privil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 10:23 PM
1

Its like you haven't heard of a single wage gap debunking in your life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 10:10 PM
2

Divorce Court (Child custody, alimony, child support, gag orders etc) Paternity fraud Domestic violence response Attitudes towards male victims and fathers Response to false accusations (DV laws, university policies, workplace policies, convictions "beyond reasonable doubt")
/r/MensRights03/03/20 09:30 PM
6

Yikes, that definitely looks weird. Like, this guy they shot someone so dangerous they couldn't call for backup and chase him down? He doesn't look like he's being aggressive, quite the opposite. That's some of the most mild resisting arrest I've seen. Even so, the guy might not be dead if he ran across two male police officers (or for that matter, if the male was more fit). If only the woman was actually able to contribute to restraining him. And my goodness, the male cop saying "shoot him" is …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/20 06:53 AM
2

Because the introduction to a thing often isn't representative of the thing itself. Scientology introduces itself as follows: It is sometimes said that while the principles of Scientology are learned in a Scientology church or mission, and from studying Scientology books and materials, the actual practice of Scientology takes place in society. Scientology is all about learning to do things to improve conditions in your own life and in particular in the lives of others. An active Scientologist is…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/20 04:19 AM
2

Nursing is on the skill shortage list here too, but an LPN will start at, say $35k CAD/year, has to take the bachelor 4-year pre-med plus 2 year afterdegree. Over the first 5-10 years of work (I don't actually know how fast salary rises for LPN), the LPN should probably double that. Problem is she's married in university. You can't do shift work with applying yourself with breadwinner-like dedication to the job, leaving no time for childcare, so that limits nursing employment somewhat. So chance…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/20 04:03 AM
3

Any time spent supporting the family should be considered alike Not really. Watching over children in a park can be work, but it isn't the same as digging a ditch. You can be on your phone for the most part if things are going well, though ideally socializing is better. Cooking can be vigorous work, or it can be casual work, and there's a difference. While I agree that housework shouldn't be considered completely unique, I completely disagree that "any time spent supporting the family should be …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 11:26 PM
1

To be fair, that's what it means and I'm being unclear. I object to it being relating to employment on the grounds that it may not substantially impact the family income, particularly when including the tuition costs. It is related to employment in a sense, but in the 10-year or even 15-year forecast may end may end up as productive as a pet project unless she truly commits to full time nursing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 11:19 PM
2

The partner in your AITA link is studying full-time, which for nursing especially is probably as much time/effort as a full-time job. That's vocational, not for pleasure, so it's a contribution of the same kind as working as long as the couple have agreed to it. It is not unreasonable to expect a roughly even split of chores in that case. It's certainly not beyond the pale, at least. I'm not sure studying is the same amount of work as a job, but it is more stressful. And for nursing I suppose it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 09:51 PM
3

Sole providers doing equal housework is a scam. While I don't think that Coltaine is correct about all single-earner marriages, he's certainly right about many and articulates the argument well. Marriages when they exist should be an equal partnership. But it goes further than that. I've worked minimum wage and I've worked as a professional. The level of work involved in those two things isn't the same, even when both are full-time. I don't think the AITA post is related to any of this, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 09:43 PM
1

What? The point of Russell's teapot is a matter of burden of proof. That there is no point discussing the existence of something unless you have some reason to believe in its existence. You haven't bothered to explain why vaccines cause autism, and Russell's point is that I cannot reasonably be expected to until you do. It is silly to prove a negative on a whim. I can disprove the validity of evidence for vaccines causing autism (disproving a positive), but ruling it out in the absence of eviden…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 07:44 PM
5

So you gave me the propaganda, got a flesh-and-blood feminist for me to read?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 03:20 AM
5

At it's core the narrative is something like 'women face inequality and unfairness, and that's not ok'. I wish that was demonstrated in feminist ideas or terminology. Is there a moderate feminist that I could read (modern or ancient) that exemplifies this narrative?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 02:25 AM
5

Aren't the core narratives hateful though? Even when reading someone who isn't really describable as radical like Bell Hooks, you still run into the same shit: Determined advocacy for superior privilege at men's expense. (the object of the narrative) Men held responsible as a group for society and bear responsibility for gender roles, including ones that are harmful to themselves -- regardless of individual contribution. (the justification for the narrative) Men seen as overstepping boundaries w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 09:28 PM
2

You really are so pessimistic about truth that you don't seem to believe people can know anything about it? I believe people can know some things about truth. If your point is that it is silly to prove a negative on a whim, your point is valid. But if your point is that allowing discussion of the truth is a mistake, then I point out that it is silly to prove a negative on a whim. Do some logical hygiene and recognize the lesson of Russel's Teapot. Give me evidence for vaccines causing autism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 08:49 PM
2

Seems to me absurd; there are literally no two equal people in the world, nor have there ever been. I mean that in a real sense and in a metaphorical sense. So why is this lie the foundation of this gender debate? This is a malicious statement. People don't believe that all people are equally capable or in equally the same circumstances. It is obvious people don't all have the same circumstances of birth, so there is no reason to insist that this is what people are talking about when they mentio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 06:09 PM
1

Like they are going to be talking about losing breasts and the humiliation of the tests where as his experiences aren't really comparable? Yep, completely reasonable. Both men's only groups and women's only groups should be allowed for all these reasons and more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/20 08:30 PM
1

It took many decades to convey to men (and often women) that women are not biologically unsuited to driving cars, higher education, professional jobs, leadership positions, political office, working in the police and military. Eh, women are biologically unsuited to working in police and military. The entire prospect of declaring women equal in the workplace has been an exercise in biological denial. I don't think the former days objection to women in leadership positions or political office was …
/r/MensRights27/02/20 08:25 PM
1

Tell me where can I find good paying manufacturing jobs that allow me to support a spouse and kids and work 40 hours a week and retire w/ a full pension. The disappearance of pensions is something I'm annoyed by (instead there are RRSP and health programs, but I miss the concept of pensions), and I'm sure I'm more annoyed than you by globalization doing away with manufacturing. Consider instead warehousing, construction, trucking (though this in particular kinda sucks atm due to lack of regulati…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/20 01:46 AM
0

Wrong! Tuition was practically free back then. Before people could have had income w/ just a high school diploma. We were clearly talking about university tuition, there's no need to bait and switch. Before people could have had income w/ just a high school diploma. That remains very true today. What's the median income in your country? What proportion of jobs that pay that income require university education? What you're saying doesn't match the numbers. This decline is the reason there is urba…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/20 12:44 AM
0

Increased spending because of cost of living has gone through the roof...Cost of housing and tuition particularly has gone through the roof. Plus we need a degree now, we didn't historically. Really? Economists do not believe this. Real wages have increased, albeit slowly. Did you have a harder life than your parents? Some of us have, but for the most part, I'm not sure that'd be true for most. Go back further than 1980 and you'll quickly reach the Great Depression. I can be certain that those w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/20 09:09 PM
0

For the most part this is due to the increased spending of the average family. Is it a very bad thing? Yes. But it is also driven by men's choices.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/20 07:11 AM
2

Nick Rekieta is an anti-metoo youtube lawyer who is covering the Vic Mignogna defamation lawsuit (he got metooed, and is suing over it). Personally I find real lawsuits more funny than deliberate comedy, though perhaps not as consistently.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:43 AM
2

What an awful name for a documentary.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:36 AM
5

Amber Heard and the ALCU deserve each other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/20 12:22 AM
2

Yes, there is an empathy gap. But it's more than that, groups in power are capable of trying to keep out groups that are not. Feminism did not have to deal with the sort of misinformation that we have to with respect to circumcision, domestic violence, and the justice system, and privilege in general, because they cause that misinformation.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 05:38 PM
0

The prosecutors were able to establish a clear pattern of behavior Really? Didn't they have to use oath-on-oath cases outside the statute of limitations to convince the jury of this? That the prosecutors did this is going to be reversed on appeal, and patters of behavior themselves are insufficient to prove specific guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/20 05:27 PM
2

I think Weinstein had a fair trial I seriously doubt that. What Weinstein did should be illegal, but they found him guilty for doing something other than what he did.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/20 05:24 PM
2

The goal of this wave was to open up opportunities for women, with a focus on suffrage. The wave formally began at the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848 when three hundred men and women rallied to the cause of equality for women. Not completely sure where you're quoting exactly (wikipedia?), but have you read the primary result of the Seneca Falls Convention? Does that read like an equality movement to you? From the declaration of sentiments: The history of mankind is a history of repeated injurie…
/r/MensRights25/02/20 08:42 AM
2

I still think it's stupid that we have two seperate groups, both of which were intended to fight for the inequalities facing their genders Feminism was never an equality movement.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 06:41 AM
1

Okay, firstly, link the study. Secondly, it doesn't provide a refutation of the "the idea that women are less interested in STEM careers" at all, that's not it's game. The goal of the study is the inverse, to show that women might not be less interested in STEM careers (well education and not careers, but I digress). In fact, if you look at the first graph, if you discard the outlier, it would indeed seem that the slope is broadly negative -- lower BIGI, higher women in stem %. In fact, each per…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/20 02:54 AM
3

Normally name is not enough to find someone, especially not someone currently living another country. Even if you limit to facebook and matching available information this can be a stretch, as anyone remotely privacy conscious won't be very discoverable if at all. Definitely worth a try come to think of it, but I'd give the odds at ~3%. Since more official avenues may cost money and mom almost certainly has an old way to contact the guy lying around which she won't give OP, but which he does hav…
/r/MensRights22/02/20 07:12 AM
4

I actually really want to find my dad but I have no idea where to even start. Could be tough, perhaps if you looked into the divorce court records and found his lawyer you might be able to get that lawyer to send your dad your contact information. Problem is that in the UK you might need an address to send those records to (ie. separate from your mom) and a small amount of cash I don't know. In the US you can usually get those records free or next to it if you are physically at the actual courth…
/r/MensRights22/02/20 03:33 AM
8

Actually a lot of second wavers were kinda the worst for that. Some of them were more careful because feminists and suffragettes had gotten a bad name for being bigoted before. Here is a list that tries to equal-opportunity the waves for the worst bullshit, which is a good jumping off point for research. 2nd wave feminists were pretty big on playing around with research numbers and DV denialism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/20 01:50 AM
3

Wayback machine, other web archival services (like archive.is), QFT (which is what I did here, because the whole thing is really just worth reading). Sometimes ceddit can get those too, but it's spotty.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/20 01:43 AM
2

That's a good way to get comments, but very often the post text isn't available when doing that. I could have just made an archive.is link, but I felt like making a comment instead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/20 01:38 AM
17

Wow, this is gold. QFTing the thing before it gets deleted: So I was in a conversation about a friend who had someone grab her butt at a bar. I said “men need to learn boundaries.” Another (white cis male) friend said “that’s a bigoted thing to say” I said, “It isn’t sexist, it is an undeniable well-studied fact that the majority of sexual harassment is done by men. It isn’t bigoted, it’s the truth.” He replied “rephrase it to say black people instead of men, and see how that sounds”. I said “we…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/20 12:49 AM
5

Traditionalism would suck less than modern feminism, but Paul Elam is right, there is anti-male feminism on the left and misguided chivalry on the right. Traditionalism is, for the most part, part of that misguided chivalry. The traditionalist view on marriage has always made divorce economically profitable for women. The traditionalist view does not agree with most here on genital cutting. Traditionalism has never given women and men similar justice in a courtroom setting. One of the traditiona…
/r/MensRights20/02/20 10:59 PM
1

With autism specifically, part of it is that we are better at identifying it in men. This is not substantial. Feminists like to try to present this as largely accounting for the gender gap, but even studies that try to present this as a major factor cannot explain most of the difference. Attempts have involved redefining autism. Autism being more prevalent in men is problematic to certain forms of feminism because it opens the door to discussions about biologically gendered intelligence differen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/20 10:11 PM
2

Learning disabilities, autism, ADHD, chromosomal issues Having only one copy of X-linked genes (one allele) makes males more vulnerable to deleterious mutations that adversely affect the function encoded by these genes, certainly more vulnerable than females with two copies (two alleles)," Dr. Migeon writes. "If his mutated allele is defective, a male cannot perform the function encoded by that gene. Yet the same mutated allele is usually less deleterious to a female, because she has a normal fu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/20 10:03 PM
1

Eh, a good answer. But you can, by that answer, see why "not all of us are like that" is something I'm only willing to take vanilla from CHS and her following.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 08:04 AM
2

not all of us are like that So what do you think of the word 'patriarchy'?
/r/MensRights18/02/20 06:59 PM
-1

but we can only assume that it was the angst of having to face her actions in court. Eh, with limited access to the facts of the case, can we really? I might be with you if you laid out what we know clearly, but I'm pretty leery of snap judgements on this sort of thing.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 02:55 AM
1

The problem is men on average are poorer then women Is that true? But it goes beyond that. Poverty means different things between the genders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 08:50 PM
2

But I don't see how having unproductive conversations is preferable to having productive ones. I don't think addressing sexism and hypocrisy is unproductive. If one is solely an intactivist and not interested in men as human beings as a whole, then sure, there is less benefit to addressing that issue from that angle (still not no benefit, mind). However, that particular hypocrisy and that particular sexism is one of the more blatant examples of how misandry drives misinformation and the empathy …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 12:49 AM
1

It's not possible to talk about all of the injustice surrounding male genital cutting It is possible. I'm making a tautology, man -- unless you disagree with me that the UN's sexist policies on gential cutting are unjust.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/20 12:17 AM
1

It's possible to talk about circumcision without discussing FGM. It's not possible to talk about all of the injustice surrounding male genital cutting without talking about the UN's sexist policies on the topic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/20 08:13 PM
2

Still, this 'control' of feelings is rather indirect. Agreed. And even more direct sorts of active input into one's own feelings tends to at least feel indirect. However, in the context of chastity this is hardly unimportant. I think the objection should not be that chastity in this sense is impossible, but rather that for one person to demand this of another person is usually abusive. Which is to say that the 'thoughtcrime' line of argument that you had could be pushed further and that the "can…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/20 12:11 AM
5

This is completely missing the point. People aren't annoyed/traumatized/anything-else at what other people around them are thinking. It is impossible to know directly what someone is thinking. Objecting to someone else's perceived "thoughts" on the basis of one's own wellbeing is so juvenile and indeed abusive it should not be entertained for a moment. If one is considering strategies for chastity to such an extent for one's own benefit, that's something else, which ought not to have any signifi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/20 12:01 AM
4

We don't control our feelings. Well this certainly isn't true as a generalization. It is much, much easier to control what you do about feelings than control feelings themselves, but it is most certainly possible to do the latter and everyone does to some extent or another.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/20 11:47 PM
3

Basically this, it isn't that the person disagrees that is the problem, but acting insulted and putting on a show whenever the object of that disagreement shows up is so aggressive that it's worth considering if you want to be around that person at all. And that isn't just for the disrespect factor, but someone who is being that viciously feminist is a false accusation risk, so even if one wishes to keep interacting with that person, at least shut up and don't antagonize them.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 11:03 PM
8

top 80% Was it 80%, or 20%?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/20 10:45 PM
3

I think part of the annoyance of the sexualization of women isn't the fact of recognizing women's beauty or attractiveness, but doing so in a way that takes away from everything else the woman is and is doing. Orlando Bloom has ruined everything comes to mind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/20 10:14 PM
6

If you look back to the various monarchies of europe, marriages were more property contracts... No. This is a fabrication. Get me evidence for this so that I can argue it. . Women were part of the system of property and her children were also seen as the property of her husband. Uh, no. Supporting children was seen as a duty. It was not very easy to enforce child support back in the 16th century, so giving the woman the children would've been seen as unfair to the wife, and the inevitably impove…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/20 11:09 PM
1

Ah, pardon my confusion then, thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/20 06:23 AM
3

It's because Sweden counts rapes drastically differently than other countries. It's pretty implausible that it is greatly more than the other countries in Europe.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 08:59 PM
1

Right, but you actually mean "feminist supremacy" and not "female supremacy"? What does "feminist supremacy" mean exactly?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/20 08:45 PM
4

But then what is the justification for calling it 'patriarchy'? What are the social norms that benefit men as a group? It's worth noting that being emotionally competent/resilient is an important skill if you're in a small group that needs to get critical shit done (to avoid starvation, violent death, etc.). Patriarchy theory tends towards talking about gender roles as being beneficial to one group and detrimental to another group but that's not how gender roles work. Gender roles tend to have b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/20 08:40 PM
4

So it's kinda just 'society' or 'social norms', except it's really referring to a subset of social norms that feminists are think are problematic and are agitating to change. So it's the opposite of the term 'toxic masculinity'. Gotta love the consistency in naming schemes /s. More to the point though, what kind of society or social norms would you say exist? I can't imagine anything describable as 'patriarchy' has a basis in fact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/20 08:07 AM
1

The ubiquity of patriarchy theory in feminist academia has resulted radical feminist supremacy within feminism theory. I think you're confusing female and feminist here?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/20 08:01 AM
1

I like the content of this post, but this belongs in /r/MRAMemes, not here
/r/MensRights11/02/20 01:43 AM
1

If there is one "decent" aspect to subs like FDS and TRP, it's that they will give politically incorrect advice that is not given anywhere else Some of that advice though gives me the creeps. I agree/u/PsychoPhilosopher that it seems most effective with the least stable and most dangerous people to bond with. there really are men and women who behave in the ways that FDS and TRP paints men and women (respectively) as. On top of that, I would argue that generally those views of the behavior of th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 10:23 PM
1

Wow, even seals the succinct summary with an xkcd, you sir are a man of culture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 10:18 PM
12

Eh, this critique for the most part isn't. Most of it doesn't address ideas or anything of that nature. It's more a collection of media pieces that try to make weird insinuations. Those that do seem very pre-Cassie-Jaye's documentary in quality. I'll broadly categorize the links here as belonging to two approaches. The first approach is exemplified by this article. That actually is a decent summary of a lot of MRM things or would be if it's main purpose wasn't to throw shade. It repeatedly tries…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 07:51 PM
2

AitA was actually helpful there, they correctly diagnosed that the problem wasn't the wedding ring, and that's how he found out about the infidelity. Bullet dodged. As for subjugation, the ring had nothing to do with subjugation. If anything, the ring saved him from subjugation to family court.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 07:06 AM
1

People aren’t talking about physical strength when they talk about equality...it especially doesn’t change anything about social equality. Well, people sorta are. That's part of what the pay gap is about. Granted the relevance to this sub isn't great, but it is there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 02:19 AM
1

No, 39 is enough for determining if a correlation exists if everything else in the study is correct. You're more thinking about quantifying things to a few percent (like for a national opinion poll).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 02:14 AM
3

If you search by last year, you'll find basically nothing.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 12:06 AM
3

Check out a resource that someone created presumably for this purpose. It lists a few you haven't got.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/20 11:42 PM
3

Haha, well, it's very much erring on the charitable side.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/20 05:18 PM
1

Last seven words of his comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/20 04:20 PM
6

Pretty bad study. Low n-count for determining punching power (some in /r/science dispute this, but the men were simply so much heavier than the women in the study and that didn't show up as relevant in their tests thanks almost certainly due to insufficient sample size). Weird methodology (didn't test actual punches, relied on some sort of upper body strength test). Obvious confounding variables (weight, height, possibly reach depending on exactly what the test was). Tests were between untrained…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/20 04:11 PM
1

Patriarchy never existed, matriarchy isn't it either (some men still have real power, and a lot of it). Basically both genders have unique advantages when it comes to political power. "Gynocentrism" is a good way to describe the female version (which has its disadvantages, search around for the term "hypoagency" for a good example of how gynocentrism can be both beneficial and not), whereas the male version could be perhaps considered a combination of wealth-inequality (the richest woman is such…
/r/MensRights07/02/20 04:07 AM
1

Now, he hasn't even been officially charged with raping any of them, and he can't be--because it's beyond the statute of limitations, but all they have to do is conclude that "beyond reasonable doubt" (inasmuch as that standard still stands) he attacked at least one of them. Yes, you read that right. It doesn't matter that he hasn't nor can be charged with assaulting any of the alleged victims. Lord have mercy. You mean that they are legally allowing induction from many unlikely or false testimo…
/r/MensRights07/02/20 03:43 AM
1

Oh, haha.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/20 08:43 PM
3

Not just for solving, but for the existence of the problem in the first place.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 08:10 PM
20

In the book Feminism Is for Everybody, the author describes 3 types of domestic violence: male violence against women, same-sex violence, and adult violence against children. There is something lacking from this list should be pretty obvious though, which is female violence against men. Reality is funnier than fiction. Oh the irony. The book actually lists out three types of domestic violence in such an obvious manner? Bell Hooks likes to criticize feminism for misandry but is extremely so herse…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 07:32 PM
4

having then thought finally that someone in my school system would bring this to awareness she then says it's because men are told to man up in stressful situations which is true but she then said "they also don't go for help" in response to me saying "there isn't as much mental health support for men as there is for women" This teacher has the MensLib-style way of thinking about the world, isn't it great? /s Oh well. Oof.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 07:09 PM
1

He also makes good sensible left wing points why it was reasonable to kick CNN out. But that particular reason is one that only makes sense to a right winger. Wait, so anyone who says "well practically speaking, of course that was going to happen" is a right winger? Good grief. He's a right wing pundit He's definitely right of me, but he seems to me to be quite a bit left of the US democrats, so to call him right-wing would be grossly misleading, wouldn't it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/20 07:08 PM
2

I don't think criticizing "the left" in general is a good thing, even if you yourself are leftleaning I'm always surprised when I see people say things like this. I'm positively shocked. Like, is criticizing drone strikes supposed to a bad thing when a Democrat does it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/20 07:01 PM
1

Also please don't conflate women and feminists as groups. He's not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/20 06:59 PM
3

She wasn't wrong. But the opposite happened.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/20 06:58 PM
2

It's another case of affirmative action for the majority in clerk positions (the "diversity" in these cases is siloed IIRC, and doesn't apply as much to real executives). This case of affirmative action seems particularly expensive given the performance of that ETF. Also atm tech and consumer stocks are investments with high downsides IMO, so this is expensive in both directions.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 06:56 PM
3

Project Gutenburg, get it free in electronic form.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 06:46 PM
6

The single best way to reduce violence against women is to encourage women not to be abusive towards men Eh. Hrm. I see that you're getting at the inter-generational aspect of domestic violence, so the statement might at some point work out to be true. That said, I don't think we have the data to really support this conclusion properly. More importantly since I agree with you in the following: And I think the message needs to go both ways. Everyone needs to be taught not to hit other people, esp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/20 06:03 PM
4

It was therefore standard gender flipping, good stuff. Gets people to realize how messed up her shit is to say without gynocentrism getting in the way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/20 05:52 PM
1

To be honest I'm surprised you didn't know about it, it's one of the larger feminist organizations that doesn't at a glance seem disgusting and has been mentioned around here a fair bit.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:10 PM
1

I think trying to get Amazon to stop selling things would hurt the MRM. After all, the DAMN book got removed.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 12:47 AM
5

MeToo is fine...
/r/MensRights04/02/20 12:30 AM
5

Sarcasm, I hope? Is there anyone who was metooed that could actually be proven guilty of what they were accused in a court of law? Closest that it gets is probably Cosby.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 12:27 AM
1

Is that a condition to consider cancelling a proportional response?
/r/MensRights02/02/20 11:04 PM
1

Nothing wrong with cancelling, as long as it's deserved. What do you think are the conditions to consider cancelling a proportional response? Why is this proportional response managed by a group of random people rather than moderated by a justice system? What does society expect to happen to cancelled people? Is the social framework set up in such a way as to support this? Our system isn't really set up to handle people who don't work for the rest of their lives for non-disability reasons.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 10:35 PM
-4

That normalizing demands to get people fired has consequences beyond this particular case. Cancel culture isn't a good idea.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 08:09 PM
-7

Since when does mob justice limit itself to people who admit it on tape?
/r/MensRights02/02/20 06:24 PM
0

Oh yes, definitely. She is not a rumor mill victim. But no one will ever be able to restrict mob justice to those against whom there is proof, and canceling is still overkill and not conducive to a successful society.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 06:23 PM
-6

Cancel more people, that'll make society more stable /s. In addition to that, cancelling cancel culture will help victims of rumor mills greatly as a side effect.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 10:53 AM
3

Bwahaha. No. Politicans don't do much for men's issues generally speaking, and the democratic party is anti-male-feminist as a rule. Firstly, Warren Farrell got to talk to O'Rourke, Yang, and one other at minimum. Warren and Biden are of course awful on men's issues. Bernie Sanders has some substantial issues with supporting feminism, which is likely to negatively impact men: link1, link2, link3. He does offer the vaguely feminist paternal leave policy. And, of course, medicare for all does supp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 09:44 AM
2

The argument is not that prepubescent kids are sexual, it's that they're being ascribed sexuality. And I'm saying that they are clearly not ascribed that by virtue of the cultural evidence that I cited. "Sky High" is a US production set in the US. That discussion I linked is from the US. Puritans were a large NA thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 09:27 AM
2

You're simultaneously saying it's about sexuality, but not about the boys' sexuality. Lordy. I've been using the word "pubescent" (my first foray into that did use "teenagers" I guess which I figured was kinda obvious what with the whole sexuality thing, but in my posts to you I've been calling attention to pubescence as a milestone). It should mean something. Have I not made it clear, that in my opinion the puritans were concerned about the sexuality of boys (particularly older young boys), but…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 09:09 AM
2

You can lie performatively if you like, but The truth is that separation between genders in NA has more to do in its origins with the puritans, separating women and girls from men and boys for the sake of chastity So you agree it is to do with sexuality then? Can hardly be interpreted as anything other than missing (accidentally I assumed) the other things I said to the effect of putting words in my mouth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 08:15 AM
2

Apparently I have to reproduce what I linked you in-line. Fair enough. I suppose it was to much to think you'd read me charitably, or read me fully, or even catch on to the relevance of "barely pubescent". Anyways, here you go: Saying 5 years old shouldn't share bathroom or sleep in the same bedroom/bed, is saying something sexual is going to happen Um, no. No it isn't. Parents are often fine to have young siblings share a bedroom. Separation of bathrooms has more to do with teenagers, and also …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 07:56 AM
3

they are separated from girls for the same reason men are separated from women, that male sexuality is inherently threatening to women. If that's what Coraline is saying then I missed it entirely, because that's neither obvious nor true. The truth is that separation between genders in NA has more to do in its origins with the puritans, separating women and girls from men and boys for the sake of chastity (protecting barely pubescent boys from visual sexual stimulation). Sexual and inappropriate …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 07:43 AM
1

Saying 5 years old shouldn't share bathroom or sleep in the same bedroom/bed, is saying something sexual is going to happen Um, no. No it isn't. Parents are often fine to have young siblings share a bedroom. Separation of bathrooms has more to do with teenagers, and also adult supervision: particularly men and girls sharing a space. I don't know about you, but in my country there are family changerooms (much less common nowadays) so in some cases 5 year olds do share such a space (usually bathro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 07:24 AM
3

That's actually how I see you too, to be honest. 1 : containing or being poisonous material especially when capable of causing death or serious debilitation 3 : extremely harsh, malicious, or harmful If I'm a toxicologist, my specialty isn't sick jokes on the internet.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 06:54 AM
-1

Okay, so if Zarya was a pedo in-lore, people would understand you if you said that Zarya is a sexualized character? This isn't a comparison that's worth making, it's its own issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 06:51 AM
1

It really isn't intuitive. Is a man who sees, say, Zarya (Overwatch) as strangely masculine (thereby projecting prejudices...) sexualizing her? If you say that Zarya is a sexualized character people aren't going to understand you. Feminism likes to exploit this sort of misunderstanding as I pointed out. It is inappropriate. Not a word game. If you need to go into this much detail about what words technically mean, you're the one who's playing word games. How kafkaesque. Brilliant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 06:38 AM
2

The prejudice against male sexuality starts before you even have one. Sure, but that is not what "sexualize" means. When sexualize means "to make sexual", it doesn't mean that you can replace every instance of "to make relating to the two sexes" with sexualize. The reason for this lies in the definition of sexual: relating to the instincts, physiological processes, and activities connected with physical attraction or intimate physical contact between individuals. relating to the two sexes When s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 06:25 AM
2

Well that's a strange word game. I don't think I'd enjoy playing that one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/20 06:07 AM
1

I think the idea being had here is that no colleagues should be on the investigative panel, because there may be a competitive relationship between them. Normally I'd say the reverse, that there is an incentive to be especially nice to your colleagues because you might end up needing something from them or being one another's superior later.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 01:01 AM
1

I think what the judge is getting at there is that although he is broke on paper the guy seems to the judge to have been illegally protecting his wealth by having someone hold onto it for him. That part isn't as disturbing as the article tries to make it sound.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 12:53 AM
7

Here is a slightly less rosy story showing that in Ontario prison for failure to pay even when unemployed is a thing. This guy in my link is some sort of fraudster, so not exactly a nice person, even then, it is troubling to read about: Justice Kurz sentenced to Mr. Garrick to 90 days in jail unless he paid the arrears of $55,000. The judge then added that if the ongoing support was not paid, Garrick would serve a further 3 days for each and every default. To the surprise of many payors, debtor’…
/r/MensRights01/02/20 10:00 PM
1

Are they really are popular to enroll in, substantially moreso than mixed? I can see obviously that it is popular to offer them, but I'm not sure the evidence is there for the response.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/20 11:39 AM
2

(I hope) You could click on any of the links, you know.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 07:22 AM
5

As I mentioned before, I love men. I work with men (primarily) as my profession. By work with, you mean work alongside I hope. If you actually work on men as your profession, it is deeply troubling that you found that story inspirational in this context. Both the fact that I was unaware of the background of the speaker and that some on this sub can't believe that most feminists love men Most feminists don't love men. It isn't that feminists don't love particular men after all that is hardly a su…
/r/MensRights01/02/20 05:40 AM
5

Because toxic masculinity is the biggest men's issue. /s
/r/MensRights01/02/20 04:30 AM
1

No, they genuinely believe that those who have children are guilty. Antilopes has it more correct: [the sub is] a home for people tormented by grief over having been born themselves.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 08:45 AM
1

That works for me, thanks.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 08:09 AM
1

If they want others to do things to their own bodies, they should prove they are willing to do the same. I suspect many of them already have. These people would have so much guilt over having created a child if they did so. Procreation is worse than grand theft (for obvious reasons, losing $100k probably doens't hurt as much as life), and many of them consider procreation worse than murder.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 12:31 AM
2

Forcefully sterilize everyone? That's entirely against human rights as a whole. No, you see, procreation is against human rights as a whole. Forcible sterilization is protecting those rights.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 12:26 AM
1

Nah, it wasn't generic enough, that was likely a response to you in particular.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 11:02 PM
1

imgur link doesn't work
/r/MensRights30/01/20 10:59 PM
1

Also in a relationship, a person is simultaneously the consumer and the product. People only realistically have relationships with others of comparable attractiveness. This means that it is just as easy for person of average attractiveness to have multiple partners (of similar attractiveness level) as it is for a highly attractive person to do so. This could be the case to an extent if the sexes were interchangeable and supply was more plentiful than I surmise. But the sexes aren't interchangeab…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/20 10:21 PM
1

Supply essentially becomes infinite In this case there may be a difference between supply actually being infinite and merely "satisfactorily large". In the case of the latter what happens in markets is that lower quality goods disappear from the market as they are no longer worth consuming (or producing). This happens with grains for instance IIRC. Same with old electronic devices likes ancient computers. With infinite supply, things become more interesting, but with large supply, in every case …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/20 11:11 AM
3

Demand for partners is essentially fixed, so eliminating exclusivity functionally increases supply. This is pretty silly. Demand for partners is not fixed, it is made fixed by enforced monogamy. Eliminating exclusivity destroys supply for all but the most attractive. It isn't about "hoarding" women (there's no way to enforce that in a poly society), but rather about consumer choice skewing to the top of the social ladder.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/20 03:51 AM
1

Arts, perhaps, but what kind of arts? There's a reason that I singled out English and not Philosophy, Psychology, or Music. But those arts should be pursued in University so that they may be pursued after university also. A great many arts majors never had any intention of ever applying their training, a pure bourgeoisie waste.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 09:50 AM
2

I don't think she ever self-identified as a feminist. She agreed to being called such after asking the definition of the term, but she never assented to the general feminist orthodoxy. I'm doubt she used the label unprompted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 09:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter