TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

greenlittleman Archive

View 6 posts and 1,258 comments by greenlittleman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,258 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

No, it works. If you weren't rejected within the first few minutes then you already passed her looks threshold. So this advice is applicable to anyone. And bragging about yourself is always fail.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/19 01:10 PM
6

You are right, but also wrong. If you feel yourself high value and being a chooser instead of chaser then you wouldn't feel need to manipulate women in any way - either she meet your expectations or you will find someone better. But it isn't directly related to your actual success in life and "awesomeness" of your life, you can have awesome life and still suck with women and fell that you are unworthy, or you can be nothing special, but having close to narcissistic self-confidence and so get lai…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/19 01:05 PM
1

The main thing is - when you try to actively do something to change a woman's interest you tend to lose your frame and become needy. In this way you will "scare away" even those women who were DTF from the start, leaving only most desperate ones or those who are REEEALLY into you. Almost all unattractive behaviour patterns are mostly based on attempts to change woman's opinion, to make her like you. And it is low value behaviour which is unattractive. High value man don't try to change woman's i…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/19 05:49 PM
4

Or because it take you at least 10 hours combined to fuck one 5/10 whore using Tinder. I never heard about anyone who would do both daygame/nightame and Tinder who wouldn't say what quality of girls they get much lower on Tinder, while time spent isn't less. And yes, getting success (it means getting laid consistently, at least once a week, without using 2+ hours each day) on Tinder isn't about being in top 20%, more like being in top 10% or even 5%. Which could be impossible depending on your g…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/19 10:16 AM
3

Not really. A lot of women, specially post wall women, desperate to find decent provider and ready to do anything to make him commit. The problem is what most guys unable to use it to their advantage.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/19 06:48 AM
2

It seems you missed some posts (they were somehow upvoted) here which discussed how cool it is to bang hookers and what it is redpill and what it isn't beta, lol. There are certain percentage of MGTOW among redpill.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/19 06:44 AM
1

This is number you get if you do everything right. On practice this is a lot. Because you can do 10 approached per day only using about 30 minutes of your time. It means you will have sex with 5-10 girls within 10 days. Which is kind of crazy.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/19 04:35 AM
7

I've read actual post. This person is high or something? Where on RedPill were advocated any illegal methods of killing babies or something like this? lol.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/19 04:57 AM
1

There is no PUA advice which tells you to settle for any girl ever, though. So it is just your own blue pill mistake. But I would say most pickup advices are wrong and useless. You just need to have strong frame. Stronger than other people, much stronger than girl's. By trying to use techniques to be liked by someone you already enter their frame.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/19 04:54 AM
1

Thanks bro, solid guide I already earned 10k on incels in few hours just by following it, 10/10. But seriously, frame is everything. Ineffectiveness of PUA only shows you how your fundamental worldview can make you fail no matter what you do. Base of pickup is what you should do "X" to be attractive to girls. But in reality this "X" is actually about don't giving a fuck about doing anything to be attractive to girls while having stronger frame. And that is it. Guys outside of PUA community like …
/r/TheRedPill06/07/19 04:47 AM
1

It would be better if you just tell me what exactly woman lose if her high value man fucks other women. MM? What you are doing now is just demagogy.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/19 04:29 AM
1

All this system exist to encourage people to be together, sure. To achieve exactly those results I talk about. But you probably don't know what there are multiple motivational systems in our brain, some of them can conflict with each other as well. Though I can't understand your point because what you said isn't even an argument and there is no contradiction to anything I said.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 05:42 PM
1

You can easily get laid if you are foreigner in a country in which your foreign status considered as high value by definition. It isn't about being rich, it is just so happens what if you are from USA or western Europe what you will be rich by standards of Eastern Europe and South America. I'm Russian btw. And I have friend who got laid easily in South Korea though he is far from being rich. Just because he is foreigner. Well, maybe also because he is also charismatic and handsome, lol. BTW ther…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 05:18 PM
1

It is how it works from evolutionary point of view. Everything else is subjective.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 05:14 PM
1

Disagree about "your husband" part. Bullshit. Woman receive full benefits from LTR even if husband fucks other women. As long as he provides resources and security for her and kids. It is some basis RP concept here. Also from evolutionary point of view the best sexual strategy is in fact to impregnate girl and then allow some other guy to take care about rest. You get benefit of spreading your DNA without actually using any resources other than your dick. In this case woman benefit from getting …
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 04:23 AM
3

She literally distributed child porn, if she didn't her punishment would be even more harmless.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 04:06 AM
13

Because she is woman and was high obviously!! Or have had a good lawyer who convinced judges what 6 years of probation is equal to 10 years in prison. I assume if husband was found guilty he would spend rest of his life in prison with real rapists.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 04:03 AM
5

You don't owe any type of life to anyone, let alone to yourself. I don't really understand your point. What it is bad if you can get laid with hot girls without building career first? It is ridiculous.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 03:59 AM
13

Both my real world experience and bunch of researches proved what your financial success isn't related to casual sex, in fact more often than not it can hinder you. This is why I don't tell girls how much I earn, even though it is just few times more than average in my city. If I was millionaire I would hide it as my most important secret. No one wants to be loved for money. For casual sex with strangers you only need two things - physical attractiveness and game. Moreover it is enough to be goo…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 03:57 AM
2

Your method is exactly what RSD Luke promotes though, lol. Getting laid in few weeks is serious achievement (not really)! But you are right about half of your points if we talk about RSD, moreover half of their coaches ( mostly Tyler, Alex and Julien) also did some shit close to sexual harassment and assault (there was post recently on seddit with bunch of proofs).
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 03:50 AM
16

Well, in fact you can kind of say what RedPill is real male feminism, if you consider it as advocacy for equality (which it is by definition, but not in reality). Equality comes from understanding truth and also shortcomings of each gender. Equality isn't about being same in everything, it is about understanding strong and weak points of everyone. Like in games there could be warrior class and mage class, equality isn't about making them do same thing, it is about allowing both classes do what t…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/19 09:39 AM
3

Other recent study showed (posted here on RP) what Unattractive, Average and Attractive guys all get 6-7 (quantity) girls in their young days, difference exist only in Very Attractive guys (like top 5%) who get 10 girls on average. Having strong frame and taking action will get you laid much more than 10 girls though. This study though proves one point - gym > height.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/19 06:07 AM
7

But lets be honest. You can't get such mass without steroids, it goes against human's biology. This is why most professional bodybuilders ARE monsters in some sense. You can't weight 326 lbs with 5'10 height without any harm to your health.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/19 06:05 AM
1

When I talk about the parasite of identity, I understand it's fucking mental. But so much that is true is also insane. As I already said - it isn't parasite, it is just one part of your brain. There are different parts of the brain with different processes happened in them. Parasite is a life form which is different from you. You can't call one part of your brain as "parasite". It is part of you. There's a fucking parasite that manipulates rats into being sexually aroused by the smell of cat pis…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/19 05:55 AM
3

Why it is so hard for people to understand what something can be considered as non-consensual only if you do something to others when: They can't resist your attempt for whatever reason (for example you can't grab random person's ass from behind, as they can't stop you). You force your way through when it was obviously made clear (by action if necessary) what you do is unwanted. It means you can hug, touch, kiss, fuck anyone as long as they don't resist even though nothing prevents them from it.…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/19 10:29 AM
30

This is so funny and ridiculous, but also so fucking sad.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/19 10:14 AM
1

NO IT'S TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE I CAN'T EVER BE WRONG ABOUT ANYTHING EVER EVEN THOUGH I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH OF ANYTHING I SAY Of course there a lot of things I don't know. But I never discuss them, because I only participate in discussions when I know facts. I don't fight for my dominance. I fight for the dominance of reality over lies. But in doing that, and not just seeking my own coward's victory at all costs, I will always, always be dominant over you. Oh yes, you do. Like all huma…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/19 10:01 AM
1

"You've just claimed they don't. But then you claim that Darwin, Dawkins and Dennett are wrong about evolution and you are right. You claim a lot of things, dude. " Well, yep. You should read something about evolution which isn't 50 years old info. " This is all you are. A person seeking personal victory for themselves." Well, yes. Because otherwise I wouldn't even have reason to read your post. It is same reason why people like playing games, watching films, etc. It is form of entertainment for…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/19 07:30 AM
1

When I talk about going to gym then I obviously mean heavy lifting. If you don't lift then you waste your time.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/19 06:40 AM
2

You missed one point. Statistically hot girls dictate their own relationship and rarely sleep with someone within first week. Only overweight somehow ugly girls do. Which means they are probably main demographic who is fucked by those men who dictate terms. So very very attractive guys can have bunch of fatties? No shit Sherlock, if you are very hot then girls with low self-esteem will throw themselves at you because it is a chance to get some validation by being fucked by someone who is much mo…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/19 04:43 PM
1

It works to maximise benefit for an organism in a habitat. And now you tell me you understand evolution? It isn't about maximising benefit. Evolution work this way - if you was unable to reproduce or survive you are out. If you was able to survive and to reproduce your DNA will continue to exist. Even if you have countless useless mutations, as long as they not prevent you from surviving long enough to reproduce you will win as long as your offspring do the same. It isn't survival of fittest, it…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/19 04:37 PM
0

I think fact what even ugly guys / girls can get laid and if they do then their lay count isn't different from anyone else proving what adult virgins and incels are like this mostly because of their personality than anything else. Or maybe those among them who aren't virgins have lower standards and so date other unattractive people while those who can't lower their standards stay virgins. In other words if 3/10 guy aren't interested in anyone below 7/10 he would stay virgin, but if he lower his…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 07:22 PM
3

Graphs above demonstrate what there is no difference if you are ugly or above average. There is difference only if you are the best of the best. Answer me this - how ugly guys can have 6 fucked girls on average, same as decently attractive guys? If looks really were the only thing what matter then ugly guys wouldn't get laid at all. But they do and number difference isn't significant. Basically what this research say is what guys who are below 8/10 (be they 3/10 or 8/10) in looks get laid with s…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 07:14 PM
3

In most cases it is guy who initiate cuckolding, I talked to some people in the scene.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 07:08 PM
2

Have you checked second link? Ugly guys still get laid with 6 girls on average while the best result is only 10 girls. Does it really matter so much if you fucked 6 girls or 10? If yes then you should just put more efforts as guys with strong frame who put efforts into game can get laid with 100+ girls which is ten times more than model looking guys get on average.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 07:05 PM
1

This research showed what there is no difference in numbers between ugly guy and attractive guy, only very very attractive guys get laid significantly (30%) more. It means it doesn't matter if you become above average if you aren't best. And depending on genetics it is possible what you wouldn't be able to become best no matter what you do.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 07:03 PM
1

I have some very physically attractive male friends and they are rather popular among girls, but.. those are mostly girls I wouldn't fuck even for money. It is hard to say if physically attractive guys are attractive to all categories of girls or only to fatties. Fatties literally throw themselves at hot guys, but you rarely see really attractive woman actively pursuing guy. After all said this research could be interpreted in many different ways.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 06:57 PM
1

No, it means what if everything else is the same then being in top 5% of physical attractiveness helps you to bang women. Check graphs. Ugly guy fuck 6 women, attractive guy fuck 7 women and model looking guy fuck 10 women, all on average. While man with strong frame can fuck 100+ women, but it can't be seen from this statistic, obviously. This research proves what looks doesn't matter unless you are very very attractive.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 06:52 PM
3

It is obvious. There a lot of more adult virgins among men than women. Also some men will lie about their count/virginity to make number higher, while for women it is vice versa. Still it allows you to understand overall dynamic rather well.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 06:49 PM
1

But it isn't what study said. It said what most ugly guys get laid with 6 girls while hottest guys get laid with 10 girls. It isn't even about top 20% because just attractive guys get about same results as ugly. It is about the best guys, like top 5%. Based on study 90-95% sexually active guys get 6-7 girls while top 5-10% guys get 10 girls. Well, it make sense, but this difference is much lower than most people expect.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 06:45 PM
7

Not really. If black pill was truth then unattractive guys would have their lay count at 0, average at 2-3 and attractive at 100. But difference between 6 girls (for most unattractive) and 10 girls (for most attractive) isn't so big, plus don't forget what guys who actively pickup girls often can have lay count above 100 even if they are below average in looks. Black pill is about "only looks matter", while it is definitely not true. Also this research would be more relevant if we know attractiv…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 06:33 PM
1

For most guys 2-3 hours per week in gym for 1-2 years is more than enough to reach like 90% of their genetic muscular limit though.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 06:30 PM
1

The difference in reported numbers isn't so big. It is 6 women for unattractive guy and 10 women for very attractive, while guys who consciously pursue sex with many women (and so learn some sort of game) can have 100+ lay count after few years of practice. Just such guys are rather rare and can't really influence statistic too much. There is no relevant studies about guys with "strong game", those who consciously pursue multiple sex partners and put efforts into it. We know what for average guy…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 06:25 PM
23

It isn't necessary about humiliation. It can be about jealousy or about feeling of superiority like "even if she fucked bunch of other guys she still chose to be with me, it means I'm better", or just guy secretly being bisexual. Sometimes he is even open about it. Cuckold fetish is rather common among guys who married for 5-10+ years without being able to cheat. It is like kid doesn't give a fuck about his old toy, but if other kids try to take it from him it immediately becomes so much more im…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 06:02 PM
1

I tried "chadfish" - 90% girls still reject you. And if you are very direct then rejection rate is even higher. Sorry, but even if you are 10/10 in looks you still would be forced to play big numbers game on Tinder. 10/10 in looks guys still have it harder than 4/10 in looks girls, if we talk about casual sex only.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 05:20 PM
1

Answer is simple - most guys aren't ugly and not model looking. They are just average. Still there are average guys who get a lot of pussy and average guys who can't get any. So it isn't only about looks. Sure, if you are very ugly it would be main reason why you suck. Sure, if you male model then it would help you succeed. But if you are average guy then you could be either very successful or get zero results depending on your personality. And what "nice guys" believe is what "getting girl usin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 05:14 PM
1

Em, what? Of course all healthy guys under 25 are horny as fuck, it has nothing to do with college. It is biology. Also, you really have problem with googling things. Just check wiki, it have all relevant info about herpes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herpes_simplex Have you even read your source? It just says what if your partner have sores it means chances to get herpes high - no shit Sherlock. But all sexually active people already have herpes. Just 99% of time it is absolutely symptomless.…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 04:53 PM
1

You don't understand evolution. Evolution isn't progress, it is adaptation to environment. Modern people are already overly-adapted, in fact we change our environment to benefit themselves, this is why most of us are able to survive and reproduce, even if we are sick physically or mentally. So what you are saying has nothing to do with evolutionary biology. You don't even understand what is this "self-image" on fundamental level. Our self-perception exist to help us understand our position in so…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 10:37 AM
1

Lol, you are really lack any education in regards to STDs. Oral herpes isn't dangerous and most people already have it. Also you said nothing about actual fact - 2/3 of men agreed to bang random girl they never met before.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 10:17 AM
1

In fact I checked out more recent researches which also included physical attractiveness of person who offer sex. You can check it here with all links on researches, or you can find it in google yourself. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/homo-consumericus/201105/sex-differences-in-accepting-solicitations-casual-sex 83% of men agree to fuck complete stranger if she is attractive. And only 3% of women in case guy is really hot. Overall all researches I found say same thing each time. Though…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 06:10 PM
1

IDK what tests you talk about, but I only seen following statistic - 75% men agree to sex with random woman, while.. 0% (yep, zero) of women agree to sex with random man. https://www.sciencefriday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gender-differences-in-receptivity-to-sexual-offers.pdf Sure it is rather old, but on the other hand it IS more honest because it is old, after all back then there weren't any #metoo or social pressure against womanisers. It isn't like men changed biologically, I assure yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 04:52 PM
1

So it doesn't matter if all men dream about fucking multiple new women each day? Lol what? Yeah, women consume literature, almost all of it about ONE high value man or at most two of them who compete with each other for her, but she still choose one of them. Women don't need to imagine having sex with ten different men each time they need to orgasm. If woman have her own alpha she don't really need anyone else. If man have 10/10 gf he still would feel desire to fuck other girls, even if they are…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 01:41 PM
1

Animal while acting like typical animal of its species once said "our species of animals should stop acting like animals". And now you say you aren't troll..
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 12:46 PM
1

Not really, in third world nations people are more religious and moral. Traditional marriage is much more common in third world countries, in some of them it is also forced by law. All developed countries have some sort of sexual freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 12:44 PM
2

Most guys already slept with that many women in their fantasies while watching porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 12:36 PM
2

Most guys with such high number would be people who lower their standards, which isn't healthy by definition. Obviously probability what you know someone who have triple digit of girls who is 7+ are very low because such guys very rare and most of them supremely attractive. Average guy can't get laid with 100+ hot girls even if he dream about it all the time. Also if we count porn then it is hard to find a man who didn't have sexual experience with triple digit of women. Believe me - if getting …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 12:33 PM
1

Oh lol, now you are saying what you aren't trying to feel your superiority by multiple time calling me "ignorant kid" or whatever? To me your behaviour is very obvious, just some primate trying to feel good about himself by belittling other people and trying to feel superiority and being full of himself using some concept of "hidden truth". You act like guy from some sort of sect. Also no, I don't feel any anger towards you same way I feel no anger towards someone who believe in flat Earth. I se…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/19 12:09 PM
7

Most people are 5-6/10 and I consider at least half of my friends as above 7/10. This scale isn't about how average person look, it is about how attractive his physical appearance on 10 point scale. People consider someone above average in looks only if t hey are at least 7/10. By my estimation it is about 20% of people. I would be considered 4/10 without my style, athletic body, etc.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 07:14 PM
2

Women don't make their choice consciously in real life dude. Read more comments. Even 5'5 dude get laid with hot girls who say this shit about fucking only tall guys. If we listen to what girls say then most guys should be sexless for life. Their words aren't reality.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 07:11 PM
1

No, not "every time". In same circumstances and if men have same qualities - maybe. So if two guys have same behavioural traits, same level of handsomeness, same level of body - then most likely girls will choose taller one. But other traits are way more important than height. It is just 1/10 of your attractiveness to women.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 06:54 PM
1

Human females compete with each other unlike many other species. On the other hand.. imagine getting advices on how to get laid from blue pill virgin. It wouldn't be very good advice. Same here.
/r/askTRP25/06/19 06:51 PM
10

In one of comments I mentioned what I'm myself 5'7 and my face is far from handsome, I have weak jaw, pale skin, bags under eyes, big nose, etc. Though I don't consider myself ugly, but I would be ranked about 5-6/10 by most people, maybe 7/10 in my best day if you ignore my height and consider my above average style and body. I still get laid consistently from cold approach and social events, almost always with girls who are 7+, I'm not really interested in those who are below 6/10.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 06:41 PM
1

Sorry dude, but you just trying to make me acknowledge you as figure of authority with some type of hidden knowledge, which you are not. You telling me about "how hard it is" but you already made three very long messages without actually getting to a point. First of all any knowledge should have a purpose. If your "hidden knowledge" can help people earn more money, get laid or be more happy then you are welcome to share it with everyone, if it really has value then you should do whole post about…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 06:25 PM
1

It isn't about fame. A lot of famous people aren't considered sexually attractive. It depends on their image.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 06:18 PM
2

I wouldn't want to born 500 years ago dude. You wouldn't want to live at that time too, believe me. We live in the best time ever.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 06:14 PM
17

Yeah, this blackpill tendency on redpill kills me. Just because looks are your only way to get girls from Tinder doesn't mean what you are fcked if you was unlucky in genetic lottery. Attractive personality traits always could help you get laid a lot with hot women, even if you are below average in looks. But the difference is what those traits help you to enjoy life more and give you bunch of other benefits, while even model looking guys/girls could be depressed losers.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 05:43 PM
14

WTF? I'm 5'7 as well and it never hindered my sexual life. I'm pretty much sure it has nothing to do with your height bro. My other friend who is 5'8 fucked about ten girls ( they were 6-8/10 in looks) from online game within one year without any problems. I don't use online game and mostly get girls from cold approach and social events, I never was rejected because of my height. And I'm from Russia, almost all my friends are taller/bigger than me. And funny enough, my shorter friends get laid m…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 05:39 PM
2

This is where you get it wrong. Alpha and beta are concepts from biology. Alpha is someone who perceived by women as high value DNA material, that is it. It is judged based on how popular and dominant he is, his looks, how he acts among other people with confidence and no fear and how others respect him. Alphaness isn't real, it is just something to which female instinct respond. This is why you don't need to be alpha always and everywhere. And this is why most successful guys can be perceived b…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 05:28 PM
1

It seems you never heard about word "logic". Your "cancer" example is completely irrelevant to my argument. And you now claim what you have some scientific proofs after demonstrating your inability to make proper argument? You even can't get to a point. If you want to say someone what they have cancer you can just do it within one sentence. But you are unable to tell what is wrong with people no matter how many comments you make. There is nothing more "scary" than the fact what we all will die s…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 02:55 PM
3

"You just can't accumulate into the excess of $100 billion and the top 3 world's richest men status without strong Alpha traits." You can, sure as fuck you can. Being very smart isn't alpha trait. And no, there are no "very intelligent dweebs" who can't make a lot of money. You can't earn money by yourself unless you have a lot of knowledge in certain areas. Also - "cunning ruthlessness" isn't alpha trait. Alpha is about biology, it isn't about success in modern society. Also as others said - yo…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 02:41 PM
3

They have real power yes, but female instinct doesn't know it. By definition being alpha is about biology, not about success in modern society. Evolution can't help us to adapt within 100 years, we didn't changed much in the last few ten thousand years.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 02:36 PM
3

Because being alpha is more about behavioural traits than anything else. If you act like beta with women then you are beta in their eyes. That is it.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 06:06 AM
4

Trump have alpha traits - he isn't only rich, he also have HIGHEST FUCKING STATUS IN WHOLE COUNTRY, he is dominant in his actions and speeches, he follow alpha-type reproductive strategy (i.e. bang many women instead of committing all resources to one). Financial success by itself have nothing to do with being alpha. You determine alpha by his behavioural traits more than anything else.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 06:04 AM
8

Because by definition alpha is someone who won biological race to spread his DNA, not someone who is successful by modern society standards. This is why Bill Gates and Elon Musk aren't "sex symbols" of women and have less female fans than any average rock band guitarist. Attraction isn't logical, our biology isn't adapted to modern society.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 06:01 AM
24

It is terrifying what you can't even divorce this bitch because law will rape you and give her your assets. This discrepancy creates such situation - she don't feel threatened at all. If by law she could get NOTHING by divorcing him she would treat him like her own god, with utmost respect and fear to be left alone.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 05:57 AM
9

Funny enough - both of those standards were controlled by law until recently. Nowadays they only control men to force us provide for women and children, but law no longer control them in any way, marriage no longer stop women from cheating without any consequences. I assume if law changes and there wouldn't be child support any more then most guys start to forget wtf is monogamy and marriage are, no one will care about sluts anymore and society enter will full fledged polygamy. It is hard to say…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 05:19 AM
1

If your "truth" isn't based on real science then it isn't truth, it is just delusion. Have you ever heard about scientific method? Everything what isn't based on it is bs by definition. There is nothing scary in reality or in facts, because world is as it is and if you understand facts you always can accept them. Whatever, you are either troll or really someone delusional, that is what really scary. No one will tell someone "reality is very scary.. if you aren't ready I wouldn't tell you this.. …
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 05:11 AM
4

Do you understand what we don't even need real women to have countless pornography materials? And most popular porn stars are definitely not exploited by anyone, in fact they are celebrities who enjoy fame and money which benefit them more than anyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 06:07 PM
7

There are large numbers of people being exploited in all sorts of industries.. but you forget what a lot of women in porn industry and in prostitution earn money the easiest way ever, from their own perspective as well - just fuck some dudes and earn in one month more than you could earn in a year with conventional work which don't require any particular skills. And in porn industry men are in much lower position than women for obvious reasons. As about male prostitutes.. most of them never have…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 05:46 PM
1

And this is why a lot of women aren't afraid at all to reject men harshly and be rude to them? No, I think it is more about opportunity to feel superior more than anything else. She know what she is protected by society both physically and morally so she can use advances from unattractive (to her) men to boost her own ego. It isn't much different from how some asshole can say "oh, you fat cow think what I can possibly be interested in you?" when being flirted by unattractive woman. I assure you,…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 10:22 AM
1

Sorry, but I can't see this "certain type of woman get certain type of man" much in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/19 10:04 AM
2

I've read one of your long as fuck comment completely and I completely understand your point. But all you do is morally judging some facts about human nature which are obvious to anyone with biological background. We are humans, just primates, animals with more developed brains than most other species. On basic level everything in us is result of evolution and exist in us either because it was beneficial to reproductive success or survival, or at least didn't get in the way. So yeah, everything …
/r/TheRedPill23/06/19 08:21 AM
2

And yet worldwide celebrities have problems with false accusations.. strange, strange indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 04:43 PM
2

Simple definition of rape which worked very well until recently - person resist or unable to resist due to circumstances. If they can easily resist without any consequences, but do nothing then it implies consent. Resistance also should be obvious and understandable, not just some weak "no" while escalating contact and doing nothing to avoid it. First of all from legal point of view there shouldn't be situations in which it would be "word of one person against word of other person". Which is why…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 04:40 PM
1

Most of those answers not based on reality, but based on "what if I have had many potential options?".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 04:34 PM
1

I can say for myself what I wouldn't have any sexual desire towards any of women from this post. I've had experience with losing erection after incidentally clicking on video with overly chubby woman on pornhub, so it isn't purely psychological. I assume most men have certain level of chubbiness scale above which woman just no longer perceived as potential sexual partner (same could be said about age). But it is a fact what certain percentage of men not only find overweight women attractive, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 04:18 PM
0

For most people it is enough not to eat junk food too much and even so, high percentage of us still can eat absolutely everything and still stay slim, it is more about metabolism than anything else. You don't need to count your calories unless you already inclined to obesity either because of your genetic or love for junk food. The thing is what for man it isn't enough not to be fat, we need to have athletic body (to be considered physically attractive) which is much harder to achieve.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 04:09 PM
1

I've read some of your comments, so your main idea is what "people do most things for the sake of their self-image", which is pretty much obvious fact, but there is nothing wrong with that and there is no problem here. So can you offer anything other than your preaching about morality?
/r/TheRedPill22/06/19 04:05 PM
3

There should be balance between being honest and being socially calibrated. In fact it is very obvious thing to anyone. Change "and fuck" to "to watch netflix" and it is already socially acceptable and highly effective.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/19 03:47 PM
2

The trick is in understanding what you don't want to fuck her, you just want to fuck any cute girl, you just want sex with cute girl and it doesn't really matter if it would be her or her hot friend. The problem isn't your desire, but your "mini one-itis" you can feel to particular woman. As long as you take action and attractive enough then you will get what you want anyway, but it isn't necessary the case for her, for example I know what I'm very good in sex, better than most guys and she lose…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/19 04:26 AM
1

Lol, there is no other definition of alpha other than biological one because it is term from biology. Alpha isn't one who trying to be attractive for woman, he IS already attractive by definition and it is women who try to meet his standards. Women are ready to do anything for their alpha, it isn't other way around. You see the difference - betas pay for sex (be it hooker or their wife), alphas get sex for free and even get paid for it (not necessary in form of money). You need to pay because sh…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/19 04:16 AM
18

He just forgot what not everyone born 6'5 Viking, lol.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/19 04:14 PM
1

Do you know what part of this is bs? Your calculations. If guy is 10/10 in looks, but 0/10 in money and status he wouldn't be perceive as average of it, because before having sex with a girl she don't even know your money situation or social status, in fact it is how it should be. I would say what it is about perceived status, i.e. if you are dominant with a girl and act as cool guy then in her mind you have high status. And money doesn't matter at all if girl look for DNA material, i.e. someone…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/19 04:12 PM
0

This definition is so straightforward what there is no room for any additional interpretation. In fact your example with child proves my point. If someone say to you what stove is hot based on his own knowledge it wouldn't be assumption, it would be statement of the fact. Stating known facts are NOT making assumptions by definition. It is same as saying what "you are just assuming what Earth is geoid unless you was in the space yourself". No, you don't need to prove all facts with your personal …
/r/TheRedPill19/06/19 10:22 AM
2

Best thing long term is to have LTR, while still fucking other women when you want someone new.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/19 07:05 AM
-2

No, assumption is assumption only if it is unknown if something is true or false, if it is known fact what something IS true then it isn't assumption by definition. By definition assumption is accepting something as truth without actual proofs. Read it again - if something is proven to be a fact it has nothing to do with assumptions, ok? Assumption - a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof. Comprende?
/r/TheRedPill19/06/19 06:56 AM
6

If not my love for visual novels and other games I probably never would be able to learn English (I'm lazy af), let alone Japanese (still in process though). Learning English allowed me to earn online more than average person in my city (I live in Russia) while working less than 1 hour a day. Also reading a lot of interesting stories (both in literature and games) allowed me to understand what can make game good storywise and so I'm now developing my own game and even if it wouldn't necessary be…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/19 05:16 AM
0

We all die anyway, so in fact any achievements are meaningless. If you want to enjoy life then games are good as long as you satisfied with other areas of your life and you have nothing more interesting to do. Life is hollow and anyone can decide how to fill this hollowness, be it with games or new car or hobbies, etc.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/19 05:02 AM
-2

Things I said aren't assumptions, but facts from evolutionary biology. I don't need to prove what Earth is geoid, I just can claim what it is a proven fact and if person disagrees with this then he is just ignorant. If you call factually true argument as assumption then it just prove your lack of knowledge about discussed subject.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/19 04:56 AM
8

I've read this article and it make perfect sense from evolutionary perspective. What exactly is "assumption"? Best sexual strategy for human female is to secure DNA from man with highest reproductive value while getting commitment from someone who is able and ready to commit, no matter who they are. Those aren't assumptions, but facts. And this theory mostly based on those facts and nothing else. Also it is as RedPill as it could be. Humans are rather unique sexually, so it is rather obvious wha…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/19 02:19 AM
0

Lol, if she have no dick and biologically female then she IS female even if she convinced what she is guy. And honestly I disagree about all this topic, in fact most guys who watch porn with trans consider themselves either straight or bi - real gays (and I know some of them) HATE trans more than we do because they are attracted to masculine traits. Biologically sexual attraction is about sexual traits (mostly bodily proportions, face and voice) so if someone looks like attractive woman, but sti…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/19 02:12 AM
1

It isn't much different from trying to promote gender diversity in DOTA (more than 95% players are males). Girls are just less interested in some subjects because on average we are different both biologically and psychologically.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 05:40 PM
2

By statistic on 2015 year 8% of people in USA consider themselves homosexual. From biological viewpoint about 4% of population are homosexual and bisexuals are about 15% among males (some of them are self-proclaimed gays who just can't get laid with women) and 90% among females. One of the researches:http://indiana.edu/~sexlab/files/pubs/Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.pdf Though it is a proof mostly for female bisexuality, as they use average instead of releasing actual data by % of people aroused.…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 04:49 PM
1

No truth, you can date biological girl who consider herself as male bi/gay and look like a model and not some sort of mutant. The problem with trans is what most of them unattractive physically.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 04:44 PM
1

Pro tip - you can destroy anyone in words battle 1x1 by just telling humiliating shit to them over and over again, even if it isn't truth. Because our brain have very weak defence against such treatment.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 04:42 PM
2

This guy probably wouldn't have balls to attack no matter how you bait him or humiliate him with words. IDK, to me it seems what in modern countries where you can't beat people things are easier. You could just destroy anyone with your frame. In Russia or Brazil even if you won "frame game" and made your opponent look like retard they still could get your ass kicked if they are stronger or have bunch of friends with them.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 04:40 PM
1

Still, cute girl who consider herself homosexual male would be sort of transgender too, lol. As long as she looks great and acts within your boundaries it doesn't really matter if she has self-identity disorder.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 04:33 PM
1

Much more. Biologically about 20% of men and 90% of women are bisexual, but consider themselves straight by choice and because of their preferences and choices. Among bisexuals majority considered themselves as straight at some point in their life.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 04:30 PM
1

Bro, I'm not even from USA, I'm from Russia and I fucked hookers before as well (it isn't legal, but police doesn't care too much, so..). It isn't my own definition of alpha, it is how things work biologically and how we were programmed by evolution. By definition alpha is someone who is high in social hierarchy and get majority of women, someone who considered as male with highest DNA value and so sought by women. Fighting for your country and being provider has nothing to do with being alpha. …
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 03:09 PM
1

Alpha desirable by women and they are ready to compete with other women to be chosen by him. If you are really alpha then you can get sex without much effort from top women, so you don't need to pay for it. In fact women would be grateful to you for fucking them. So alpha have zero reasons to buy sex. Moreover some women even would be willing to pay for you as long as you don't leave them. The point of being alpha is what you have value by yourself and so it is women who should add additional va…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 02:09 PM
1

I know what you mean, in fact this "freedom from validation" was one of the reasons why I didn't have sex with women when I was 17-21. If the only reason why you pursue women is sexual gratification then you wouldn't even have any motivation because it is shitty motivator and as I said sex isn't much better than masturbation and much more risky and effort consuming. This same concept make many guys go MGTOW. But it is just delusion, after you experienced woman go crazy about you it is no longer …
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 02:03 PM
1

No, you need this validation, same way you need to feel respect from other people. Your brain programmed this way - we are social animals and when there are proofs of us being alpha, being high in social status - it will feels good. Because from evolutionary point of view it is the best thing for our survival and reproduction. It isn't about what you think, it is about how you was programmed by evolution, you can't cheat your biology.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 03:48 AM
1

Loool, it has nothing to do with religion and I'm atheist myself. When you masturbate or order hooker your brain understand what you are cheating yourself and not attractive alpha male this is why it wouldn't give you as much neurotransmitters of happiness as when woman willingly beg you to fuck her. Because it is a proof of you being alpha, being attractive and winning other men. It isn't even social, but biological thing.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/19 03:45 AM
5

So it is like playing offline game with cheat codes. It become boring very fast and you know what you are cheating and not really achieved anything. Also result of fucking hooker - is just sex, but result of being redpilled and getting girls is what there would be girls who sincerely consider you their god and ready to do anything for you (even if temporary). There wouldn't be 30 years old virgins if sex was just about sex itself. In fact there is no much difference between masturbation and sex …
/r/TheRedPill17/06/19 05:39 PM
2

In fact sex isn't worth much. It isn't so much better than masturbation unless you are really skilful and know how to create emotional states both in you and the girl. And if you use fleshlight.. Most adult virgins who are ashamed of their virginity still hesitate to lose their V card with a hooker, even if they can afford and and hooker is really hot. They rather settle for below average girl. Why? Because getting girls is a proof of your ability as a man. You feel sense of accomplishment when …
/r/TheRedPill15/06/19 02:11 PM
-1

Because this post is bs. I have seen Tinder statistic of very hot guy who tested how effective it would be to just offer girls sex. It took him 30 000 matches to sleep with 4 girls. In some cities there is even no 30k girls on Tinder... You could get matches if you are good looking, your "child rape" profile would be considered as a joke, but it wouldn't be 100% of girls you swipe, it always would be less than 10% no matter how good looking you are. And yeah, without any game you will fail even …
/r/seduction14/06/19 03:22 AM
3

You just have very fragile ego and it hurts you when you approach and girl don't acknowledge how good you are. Guys who take action could sleep with 100+ hotties within a year, this sort of result is absolutely impossible for you. If you want something then you should take action to get it - obvious, isn't? If you see hot girl and too pussy to approach her it doesn't mean what you are "on your purpose", it is just excuse. Unless you already have quality of sexual life which is more than enough f…
/r/seduction14/06/19 03:18 AM
1

Its just how it works online and the reason why for most guys online game is a waste of time. In real world most women can't afford to be so choosy and they could assume what you are high value based on your frame and behaviour.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/19 02:47 PM
2

In most cases the problem can't be solved by getting athletic body. Problem with incels is often psychological - they just do nothing and give up immediately after some failure.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/19 02:43 PM
0

Maybe you are right about Brad Pitt, but not about average dude who looks like Brad Pitt. He would smash girls because of his celebrity status. Of course it still depend on circumstances. If he cold approached then even BP will be rejected by majority women. But if he just choose girls who message him online then he would be really successful. As "more than anyone on this board" thing? I don't think so, because some guys here have lay count about 200+. Which you can't achieve even with celebrity…
/r/seduction13/06/19 05:31 AM
5

When I was in my school days I was approached by some girls. I haven't fcked any of them. Girls approaching you still expect you to lead interaction to sex anyway. Exception are very drunk girls with very bold personalities, but they are rare and in most cases far from being hot.
/r/seduction13/06/19 05:27 AM
3

If you have unattractive personality then girls would be turned of as long as you open your mouth. Though if you are really shy then you wouldn't even talk to them. I've seen very good looking guys chased by girls (most of them below average btw). Some of those guys just freak out and don't know what to do. Or they lose themselves and start to act as complete retard.
/r/seduction13/06/19 05:25 AM
1

" Let’s talk about game. There is no amount of game that will get you a girl who is not attracted to you. Game is used to help give girls/guys who can “take it or leave it” a reason to do x y z with you. Here’s an example" No dude. Game is about having attractive personality. If you have attractive personality traits then there would be more girls who are attracted to you and you will be able to lead things to sex easily. If you trying to convince someone who don't give a fck about you using "ga…
/r/seduction13/06/19 05:22 AM
1

It isn't "there are women out there", but "almost all women like this if you push for sex fast enough". Women can want to have sex with you within less than one hour of knowing you, but she understand logically what it isn't right thing to do (as it make her feel to easy, even if she likes you and want to have sex), so she says no. And this "no" indeed means what you should go around it, just not by pushing, but on contrary doing "push-pull".
/r/seduction09/06/19 04:41 AM
0

In most cases women say "no" when it is your first sex and she say it not because she don't want you (because if you already isolated and did petting she likes you), but because she expect you to take full responsibility so what she wouldn't feel herself slutty. In this context "no" means not "fuck off, I'm not interested in you", but "I'm interested, but it is too soon, I'm not a slut, etc". This is what we call last minute resistance and just pushing it through by doing things anyway isn't a g…
/r/seduction09/06/19 04:39 AM
2

Prioritising serious relationships is just doesn't make sense nowadays when easy contraception and STD protection exist, when you can have sex with basically zero repercussions. Guys who bitching about this do it not because women have casual sex, but because they have casual sex with other guys and not interested in them even if they offer commitment, lol.
/r/seduction08/06/19 04:57 PM
3

Saying what you are 5'5 and have a big debt in Tinder bio? Just no. With good profile you wouldn't need to ask people for opinion because it would be faster just to get some matches. Girls are superficial AF on dating apps, so create a profile what would make you look amazing. Photos are 90% of your success anyway. You look fine, but your photo is far from best. Google "playing with fire tinder" there is whole blog about getting girls on Tinder, it is completely different game and you can't play…
/r/seduction08/06/19 04:48 PM
1

Looool. Nowadays 95% of young people have their photos on internet. There are zero cons out of it. From what I've read so far you seems to be a little bit autistic honestly.
/r/seduction08/06/19 04:44 PM
1

As I already said - your worldview is shit, your self-esteem is shit. Those are things what prevent you from success. You said what you work on yourself. It means what you at least do some sport activity. Check out "rate me" sub and if you really was rated as less than 3/10 by everyone then you could be right about "being too ugly for women". But it is like 1% of population. I'm 99% sure what you are just average guy, but because of your self-esteem problems you can't get any woman.
/r/seduction07/06/19 04:43 AM
1

It isn't you who decide if you are 4 or less, go to "rate me" sub and ask people to get real picture. If you are really ugly then it would be hard to get hot looking women. Still you could get below average women no matter how ugly you are.
/r/seduction06/06/19 11:09 AM
3

Lol, no. Alphas and betas exist only in handful of species. For example gorillas. In this case alphas dictate social rules. Humans ten times more complex species.
/r/seduction06/06/19 07:18 AM
1

Mm... if woman dates someone it doesn't mean what she consider them good looking. This is exactly what I'm talking about here. There is no such a thing as "good looking enough for women". If you aren't sure where you are in attractiveness then go to "rate me" subreddit. If you could get 4/10 then you are fine enough to get women. All this sub is about one simple fact - female's attraction isn't only about looks. In fact your looks are only 10% of your attractiveness to women. PERIOD.
/r/seduction06/06/19 05:42 AM
3

First humans HAVE HAD social norms too. Even other primates have kind of social norms.
/r/seduction06/06/19 05:40 AM
1

WTF? I said what YOU would approach women, not they approach you. Even best guys rarely got approached by women because most of them don't have balls. It is your role as a man to take initiative and give her a chance. Your worldview is fcked up based on what you said. UGLY FAT GUYS STILL COULD GET GIRLS. It isn't about your looks, it is about your personality and frame more than anything else.
/r/seduction05/06/19 05:53 PM
3

You are wrong. Theoretically we could create society in which sex wouldn't be treated as something "intimate" and everyone will just fuck each other as a part of their friendship. Obviously touching each other in this case would be fine, even if some stranger grab girl's ass she would smile and grab his own instead of calling the police. This is all about social norms and not biology.
/r/seduction05/06/19 05:51 PM
2

No, you wasn't yourself in true sense of this word. If you really freely followed your desires then, like healthy male, you would approach any attractive girl you see in right circumstances and tried to know her better. You would approach few hundreds of girls per year at minimum if you really haven't hold yourself back. And you would be honest about your intentions and desires. You trying to be liked by women and want to attract them, but the point of the post what you should just do what you w…
/r/seduction05/06/19 05:02 PM
1

All animals have some sort of "consent" and choose their mates based on their preferences. This is necessary for sexual selection to exist.
/r/seduction05/06/19 04:55 PM
0

Well obviously, we would be purely monogamous species if this strategy was perfect. Best sexual strategy for man would be to sleep with many women and either being able to provide for them all (having a lot of status and resources), or make other men take care about kids (which she should do actually). But basically all guys are fine with having LTR (falling in love and having oneitis) and give their resources to children, it means what this strategy too was rather successful. Even most alpha gu…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/19 06:05 AM
1

He did daygame cold approach for some time. Instead of standard "take the phone, then date, then to your place" process he tried "high risk high reward" same day lay process which is actually more effective (and fast) for experienced guys. But the problem is he wasn't experienced so even if girls were interested and he was able to lead them to isolation he was stopped by hardcore last minute resistance. His main problem was he acted in rather creepy way sometimes.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/19 05:37 AM
1

Oh, this study about CEOs is interesting, you could read about it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Height_discrimination You could as well say what "most Hollywood stars are above average in height" as a proof. CEO is basically a face of company, but it isn't necessary most influential person in it. Interesting thing in humans is what our sexual strategy is dualistic. You are right about "alpha fux beta bux" saying, but also somehow wrong. Humans have such unique traits as virgin hymen and or…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/19 04:56 PM
4

Well, imagine 300lbs 50 years old woman maintaining eye contact while giving you flirty smiles. I assume it would be just a little creepy, lol. But it is a bad thing? She have full right to do this. Making someone uncomfortable isn't a crime and shouldn't be considered as one. But now feminism try to make it into something punishable by law, in fact they already did it with all this "sexual harassment" bs.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/19 04:12 PM
6

I already answered above, but it depends on a person. This shame is much more conscious than you think and depends on worldview. This is why some guys don't even feel much changes after doing nofap for more than month.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/19 04:05 PM
12

I have had similar results even when I fapped everyday. It isn't related to nofap, but rather to your self-esteem and confidence. If you are ashamed of masturbation and feel inferior because of this then it will probably work like this. Though it is better control yourself and not stare at EVERYONE, for example you'd better don't do this to a leader of some dangerously looking group of people late at night, lol.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/19 04:02 PM
30

One of the problem for "faithful" men is what when you actually get a girlfriend other girls become much easier. It is as if some of them think like this 'oh, he have a gf, if I seduce him it would mean what I'm better then she is' and go for it.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/19 03:52 PM
1

You need links? Why not, mr. "I'm banned in google". https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2739403/ "Women’s ability to imagine themselves as the woman in the film was the only factor the strongly correlated with their reported arousal. Men, however, rated the attractiveness of the female actor and the ability to observe the woman important in their arousal to the film in addition to imagining themselves in the situation." http://indiana.edu/~sexlab/files/pubs/Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/19 03:32 PM
2

Most men are superficial and would want to have sex with any girl who isn't too fat or ugly. Even if you are overweight and your face aesthetic far from perfect you still could get sex with men easily just by using online dating like Tinder. Things would be hard if you want to have sex with some particular man though, oneitis just doesn't work either with men or with women.
/r/seduction04/06/19 05:41 AM
1

If woman follow advices from this sub then she will get (rather give) sex, but not necessary relationships. If woman more or less attractive and being just a little direct then it is very unlikely what guy would reject "free sex" provided to him. But like OP said - in this case he will consider her "easy to get" and likely wouldn't want to have anything serious, unless he really desperate. So "game" for woman wouldn't be about getting sex as fast as possible (which is the "game" for men), but to…
/r/seduction04/06/19 05:39 AM
0

For women things work like this - choose among those who are already interested in you. When you try to get guys who aren't trying to get you it makes you "easy to get" from those guy's perspective, there is no real way around it. You already answered your own question basically. Learn how to flirt and don't be so obvious. Guy should chase you a little before getting sex, or else you would be considered as an easy to get, because in this case you ARE easy to get. If he got you effortlessly then …
/r/seduction04/06/19 05:32 AM
2

Bro, there are multiple researches which could prove what women don't really give a fck about your physical attractiveness biologically. They have NO DIFFERENT physiological reaction on porn depending on a man in it. In fact all heterosexual women have sexual reaction on porn with lesbians, or with ugly men, etc. While men excited only at porn with attractive women, women excited on basically anything. Because they are different. For women sex is about status more than anything. In society which…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/19 04:13 AM
0

Have you googled what I said to you? Do you think this guy who gold laid 10 times out of 30k swipes isn't goodlooking enough? What I tell you are real stats you get when you are at least 9/10 in looks and directly offer girls sex on Tinder. You use some fake loser as a proof while I tell you real stats of real guys. You sure can get laid from Tinder a lot if you have awesome photos, but it still would be numbers game. You sure could get laid few times a week, but it would be still only 1% of gir…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/19 04:04 AM
2

Sor, but I can't check her looks as link either dead or can't be accessed from my country. But what I'm talking here is his texts, they aren't corresponding to peak SMV. As I said - if you are beta inside then your peak SMV will attract mostly crazy whores who care about your status or money more than anything else and tolerate your terrible betaness.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/19 03:59 AM
1

Those aren't observations, but rather interpretations.
/r/seduction04/06/19 03:54 AM
1

Any proofs? Why would he waste so much time and efforts (to the point of paying for her) on some crazy single mother then? Why would people with crazily high SMV still marry some 7/10 and then get divorce raped by them? Because if you are really blue pill inside then no amounts of SMV could save you.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/19 03:50 AM
1

Your problem is what your all worldview is wrong. The main difference between guys who get girls and guys who are not in their worldview, everything else is just consequence of it. All this sub is about useful advices, read top posts and learn from them. In your case you should develop attractive personality while also working on your looks and changing your worldview to one which is actually based on reality. You are just blaming others for your own problems instead of actually solving them. Yo…
/r/seduction03/06/19 04:00 PM
3

"B: If you deserve it! N: Okay!" Yep, peak of male SMV. Beautiful thing. ;) If you are beta inside then your peak SMV wouldn't help much other than attracting those crazy whores who will fck you no matter what kind of shit you do. Because they aren't attracted to you, but to your status, or rather to the fact what getting you will elevate their own.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/19 03:55 PM
1

Just not true. Without looks, but with game and ability to take action you will get much more pussy than guy with looks who does nothing and waiting girls to throw themselves on him. Of course I don't talk about guys with physical deformities, 300lb of fat and terrible smell. I talk about normal guy who just wasn't lucky enough to be born handsome and tall compared to someone who won genetic lottery.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/19 03:48 PM
1

You would be shocked, but in eastern countries your looks doesn't matter so much. It is more cultural thing than anything else. The more feminized society the more emphasis put on man's physical attractiveness. In more masculine societies his social status and wealth play much more important role. It is rare to be athletic in USA, but here in Russia almost each fourth guy have muscles and trained at least 1-2 years in a gym. Makes no much difference. But your social status within social group (l…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/19 03:46 PM
2

This shit is very cultural. I have a friend who have awesome body and looks really good, one of his workout videos (done when he was 19-20) have 4 millions views (he is minor celebrity in our city) on youtube and he still was a virgin until 24+ years. If you have no game and don't take enough action then you will get absolutely zero results. If you have game and take action, then you will get results no matter how ugly you are. Your looks will affect your statistic, sure. But the difference betw…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/19 03:37 PM
0

IDK, seems like bs to me. I've seen Tinder statistic from guys who are really good looking, no less than this guy. For example google "goodlookingloser tinder stat" and check post from RevLife. If you are very straight about fcking girls then even if you look good your stat would be terribly low. Sure you could get reactions like this, but it would take you are lot of time. Then, after messaging to hundred girls you will take screens from most ridiculous ones, but it wouldn't prove anything.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/19 03:32 PM
1

It make sense what famous and hot guy don't need to rape anyone and there would be bunch of girls who dream about being fcked by him. It is same as saying "now I wouldn't believe if I hear what some virgin nerd was raped by hot 10/10 model". Of course you shouldn't believe something if it sounds like fiction.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/19 03:18 PM
1

First of all - you shouldn't try to "convince" a girl on anything. When you are coming from high value position it is she who should take her chance and convince YOU what she is better than other girls and worthy of your time.
/r/seduction03/06/19 06:45 AM
0

It is so beyond your reality what some girls make out with random guys at clubs/bars?
/r/TheRedPill03/06/19 06:42 AM
1

WTF? Day game is either about same day date or taking a number. You would need about 1 minute to take girl's number. If you are using some sort of complex bs techniques to "make girl like you more and warm up to you" then sure day game would be a waste of time. But what I tell you is based on experience of me and other people who do direct simple game. You just tell a girl what you are interested to meet her either now or later and then proceed from this. Average approach will take you about 1-2…
/r/seduction02/06/19 08:55 PM
3

Check this guy's history. He is just bitter depressed incel.
/r/seduction02/06/19 03:01 PM
3

Completely agree with you - I personally can't understand those guys who claim "there is no cute girls at daygame". If your city have universities then there are basically countless girls to approach.
/r/seduction02/06/19 02:55 PM
2

How it could require more work though? You could do daygame 10-15 minutes a day while doing your everyday routine (approaching girls when you are going to work for example) and still get some results. For most guys nightgame is at least 2-3 hours, also success rates are lower (obviously) because of all the competition, quality of girls is lower as well.
/r/seduction02/06/19 02:52 PM
1

He doesn't means what 80% of guys approach girls non-stop, but what they are at least tried it more than once. Of course you wouldn't see all guys approach all the time, even in night venues.
/r/seduction02/06/19 02:49 PM
1

For most guys difference between night game and day game is what at day game they are sober and alone. Almost anyone can approach someone if they are drunk and with friends backing them up.
/r/seduction02/06/19 02:47 PM
7

This is next level of bro science right here. This shit has nothing to do with real neuroscience. There are much more neurotransmitters than serotonin and dopamine and their work extremely complex. You can't make any conclusions just based on some minor facts. Also research in the link is about serotonin synthesis, not receptors. If you actually read the research and conclusions then you should know what this difference is about our adaptation to stress. This research just proves what men are mu…
/r/seduction01/06/19 04:45 PM
3

Even if she really cheats on him it doesn't means what she immediately divorce him, in fact in a lot of marriages which lasts for 20+ years both parties already cheated, sometimes more than once. Also IDK how she could get 100% of assets in divorce, never heard about it and usually it is 50% to 50%, in case of Jim he would win because his wife, obviously, earn more than him. Though it is rare, but even in USA there are men who marry rich women for the sake of getting their money and do so succes…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/19 04:42 AM
1

Sorry dude, but I personally have seen how ugly fat guys got laid with hot girls.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/19 06:02 PM
2

Lol, you have such a vivid imagination. Through the Bible he always promoted asceticism and almost all saints were ascetics at some point in their life. Could you quote Bible when it said what Jesus was rich?
/r/TheRedPill31/05/19 05:56 PM
2

If we imagine our knowledge about the world as a jigsaw puzzle then religion would be attempt to say what "every lost piece of puzzle is a proof what God exist".. And while they are proven wrong over and over again (we know what diseases aren't god's punishment, we know fundamental universe laws, etc), there are always some missing pieces on the one hand and on the other there are so much pieces we already have what most people just don't know about them and there is no one who can have knowledg…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/19 04:57 AM
2

You should understand what they BELIEVE in their religion, they don't choose to follow it rationally.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/19 04:48 AM
4

But Jesus lived without any possessions. Without car, for sure. So did many Saints, they even tortured themselves for the sake of their beliefs. You just called this way of life retarded. You are very religious for sure.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/19 04:45 AM
2

Reverse the situation.. So when you go somewhere and hot attractive girl stop you to chat a little because she likes you - then your only thought would be "omg, why you talking to me, you creepy woman"? Fck no. If you are normal guy then, even if you are really busy, you at least would be flattered and happy about this situation. Here you go, empathy master. If I consider myself attractive and what she win big time by being my girl then from her point of view she should be grateful to me for app…
/r/seduction30/05/19 03:38 PM
61

I personally never seen any news about woman doing something extraordinary tech-wise.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/19 03:25 PM
7

Bro.. Read Torero and Krauser's blog. Even those guys who consider themselves as "daygame guru" have sex only with 2% of girls approached. So to get consistent results you would need to do literally hundreds approaches. At least 500 per year. You don't need to monitor each small approach and then write blog about it. It is a big numbers game, nothing else. Girl's reactions means nothing, you wouldn't sleep with 95% of them anyway.
/r/seduction28/05/19 11:50 PM
0

You shouldn't be too ugly it is for sure, but difference between being 6/10 and 10/10 isn't so big in real world game. In online it sure would be BIG, but in, for example, daygame you wouldn't even see it. I know guy who is legitimate 9/10 (some girls commented what they never have seen such handsome guy and wondered if he is a model) and out of 500 cold approaches he slept with only one girl. Just because his game have had some serious flaws. And of course I know guys below average in looks who…
/r/seduction27/05/19 06:30 AM
2

Getting laid isn't just about validation. It feels amazing to have same day lay. It feels amazing to have sex with different hot girls and knowing the fact what you are extremely attractive to them. It isn't purely about validation, though if you don't care about girls or quality or enjoyment of the process and ready to sleep with unattractive girls just to add number then there is indeed a problem. BTW I never felt any "holes" and don't really understand what are you people talking about here. …
/r/seduction26/05/19 04:41 PM
7

Yeeah, she definitely thought a lot about it beforehand, it is likely what she completed some "how to pickup guys" mega course and learned all complex tactics about how to approach girls... Nope. She just approached him while trying not to lose her value. It is on level of instinct for most girls. There is no tactics here, just natural behaviour without any thinking behind it.
/r/seduction26/05/19 03:51 PM
3

It is a dream of any loser who can't approach girls consistently. If you are really good looking and put yourself out there then sure, you encounter some situations like this. Few times a year. Maybe it would allow you to sleep with 1-3 girls per year. Of course those girls, at most, would be average because really hot girls already have a broad choice among handsome guys. Being goodlooking isn't a magic pill if you want to get consistent results with girls. It is enough to be 5/10 in looks to g…
/r/seduction26/05/19 03:49 PM
6

It is true for western society and if you have no balls to approach girls. Even if you are 10/10 in looks you still wouldn't get sex with 90% of girls you cold approach. Looks matter on Tinder and if you want to be approached by girls because you have no balls. But do you really need a girl who have more balls than you?
/r/seduction26/05/19 03:43 PM
12

Even if you look amazing situations like this one would happen 1-2 times a year and girls who will take initiative would be average at best. It isn't consistent way to get girls and work only in societies in which girls are more masculine and proactive. I live in Russia and situation like this could never happen here. Heck, saying "cute" to a guy wouldn't be considered a compliment here. If you want a girl to take initiative (which is your responsibility as a man) then at most you will get girls…
/r/seduction26/05/19 03:41 PM
2

" Actually, at this point in my career, I make an active effort not to look attractive, lest some creep makes an inappropriate move and I have to spend my mental energy dealing with it. " And then she wonder why she is single at her age...
/r/TheRedPill23/05/19 06:36 PM
1

Biohacking is unscientific bs for the most part.
/r/seduction23/05/19 06:05 PM
2

And if you actually read ncbi researches then you should know what negative effects prevalent in people who are 45 or older and influence on young people is rather insignificant. Also it all depends on balance of your diet and how much trans fat you actually consume. Well, I assume it is obvious to anyone what it is unhealthy to have high bodyweight %, but as long as you are able to keep it rather low then it doesn't matter so much what you eat.
/r/seduction23/05/19 06:05 PM
1

So, how many new girls you have had sex with in the last three years? If you follow all of this and your number is less than 50 then all of this unrelated to seduction or pickup. How to get girls - develop social skills, your looks and approach a lot. The higher your skills, looks and the more girl you approach (either IRL or online) - the more girls you will get. Everything else wouldn't give you even 10% of it. ​ Also it doesn't make much sense what "porn makes you needy". People become needy …
/r/seduction23/05/19 06:01 PM
3

Ahaha, what a load of bull. Most men don't have balls to approach someone, so why you think what girls would have balls to approach you? Stop living in delusion. Social roles already determined by society. Even handsome millionaires struggle with getting girls unless they have decent social skills and take initiative by themselves. There are girls who will throw themselves on really hot guys, but they are low both in quality and quantity.
/r/seduction22/05/19 04:23 AM
2

It means nothing, there are lesbian and bisexual women who please each other without any dick at all (other than strap-on). It is easier to make a girl cum with your fingers and mouth, most guys, no matter their size, unable to give a girl really strong orgasm most of the time. Learn fingerstyle bro and girls would tell you what you are the best sexual partner they ever had.
/r/seduction21/05/19 10:03 AM
-1

There is no "seduction" sub for women for a reason. I assume it is common sense what most men have only one main criteria - your physical attractiveness. If you are physically attractive then you could have as many sex as you want and you can choose among many men to find someone who is good choice for you. If you are obese or have really unattractive face then no matter what you do most men just wouldn't be interested. Most people understand this so there is no much info about seduction for wom…
/r/seduction21/05/19 09:57 AM
30

I assume it would get ten times more likes as well.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/19 08:31 AM
53

By definition of law OP was literally raped in this case. When you use lie to make someone consent into undesired sexual encounter it is called "rape by deception". For example men who lie about being "porn producer" to fuck girls are punished by law. Lets not talk about how stupid this certain law, but if we reverse genders of OP and his wife then reaction of community would be COMPLETELY fckn different. They will, probably, tell him go to police asap.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/19 07:54 AM
1

Yeah, nowadays you can't compliment a woman on her physical traits, unless she is truly attracted to and not crazy #metoo feminist then it could be considered as sexual harassment. Even if you just return her own compliment and did it in playful and harmless way.
/r/seduction18/05/19 05:24 AM
1

Yeah, nowadays you can't compliment a woman on her physical traits, unless she is truly attracted to and not crazy #metoo feminist then it could be considered as sexual harassment. Even if you just return her own compliment and did it in playful and harmless way.
/r/seduction18/05/19 05:09 AM
1

Yeah, nowadays you can't compliment a woman on her physical traits, unless she is truly attracted to and not crazy #metoo feminist then it could be considered as sexual harassment. Even if you just answer on her compliment and did it in playful and harmless way.
/r/seduction18/05/19 05:08 AM
1

Yeah, nowadays you can't compliment a woman on her physical traits, unless she is truly attracted to and not crazy #metoo feminist then it could be considered as sexual harassment. Even if you just answer on her compliment and did it in playful and harmless way.
/r/seduction18/05/19 05:07 AM
1

This is a wrong sub for this post. There a lot of blue pill incels out here, sorry.
/r/seduction18/05/19 05:04 AM
1

This is a wrong sub for this post. Try TRP, lol. There a lot of blue pill incels out here, sorry.
/r/seduction18/05/19 05:04 AM
1

Yes, it is disrespectful if you always tell someone "hey you, do X, Y, Z" and all he did is stand for himself, he didn't tell her to "fck off" or called her a bitch, he wasn't a jerk here at all, he just stopped someone who WAS a jerk to him.
/r/seduction18/05/19 05:02 AM
1

So... telling someone to call you by name and don't be disrespectful to you is actually "being a jerk" from your point of view? Okkk...
/r/seduction18/05/19 05:00 AM
1

This is a wrong sub for this. Try TRP, lol. There a lot of blue pill incels out here, sorry.
/r/seduction18/05/19 04:59 AM
1

This is a wrong sub for this. Try TRP, lol.
/r/seduction18/05/19 04:57 AM
1

This is a wrong sub for this. Try TRP, lol.
/r/seduction18/05/19 04:56 AM
1

This is a wrong sub for this. Try TRP, lol.
/r/seduction18/05/19 04:56 AM
1

This is a wrong sub to post this, lol. Try TRP.
/r/seduction18/05/19 04:55 AM
1

This is a wrong sub to post this, lol. Try TRP.
/r/seduction18/05/19 04:55 AM
1

Well, yeah. If women worked same way men do then there would be at least 80% DTF. It also depends if you only sweep only on more or less hot girls or just everyone.
/r/seduction17/05/19 05:31 PM
1

It isn't like hot guys are mythical existences. Actually most guys who teach "how to get laid on Tinder" are actually very hot, like at least 9/10 on their photos. And they still need game and their match % is much lower. You just judge based on how high match % is for hot girl. But it isn't so for guys. And even if you matching with a girl most of them wouldn't meet you in person. Though yeah, if you are hot guy then you could get abundance of sex from Tinder, no one denies this fact. Just it w…
/r/seduction17/05/19 05:17 PM
5

Most guys do only nightgame (if we ignore online). Because it is 10 times easier to approach girls. It also means what you compete with all other drunk losers who mustered their non-existent courage to approach girls. And it also means what the girls you could get are only those who spend a lot of their free time going to clubs and bars instead of doing something more appropriate for night, like sleeping. If you are skilled in daygame you could do instant dates and sleep with a girl within hour.…
/r/seduction17/05/19 04:27 PM
3

Totally can't understand how is it related to topic of discussion. It wasn't your actions what made him not interested, but the fact what he have had a crush on someone else. Even if you acted differently nothing could be changed here. Also the fact what you two were co-workers could play a big role here, a lot of guys have a rule "don't shit where you eat", it is specially actual now with all those #metoo bs when you no longer can just flirt with people at your work without high chance to be co…
/r/seduction17/05/19 03:14 PM
2

Let me guess.. they lost their interest already after the sex, not before. Though you actually right what a lot of guys can't appreciate it when a girl is overinvested in them. Actually such overinvesting also could be an indicator of when someone really loves you and if a girl doesn't act likes this at any stages of relationships then I can pretty much be sure what she at least isn't deeply in love with me. When person really loves you then he will act as if you are the most important thing in …
/r/seduction17/05/19 01:54 PM
-4

It is just because laws are fcked up. There is such thing as implied consent. If a person don't resist actively (either physically OR/and verbally) while they can then they are consented to your actions. Can you imagine a guy being raped by his male friend at his place while all his resistance would be "I'm not sure... maybe not this time.. it isn't right thing to do..." while actively participating in physical contact, kissing him back, etc? No, if this guy isn't gay then he will resist as if h…
/r/seduction17/05/19 11:30 AM
2

Guy who could reject idea of having a harem of anime magical cat girls with large boobs wasn't born yet. Only if he is gay, then it would be anime magical cat boys with big... something else.
/r/seduction17/05/19 11:22 AM
9

Not really. If a hot girl act like this then most guys would consider it as cute and attractive. If a hot guy act likes this.. then woman wouldn't consider him hot any more.
/r/seduction17/05/19 11:20 AM
8

IDK why you are downvoted for truth, lol. Well, those things matter, but only after the sex, not before.
/r/seduction17/05/19 11:18 AM
5

But in reality - she will. If a guy with those qualities tries to cold approach women then most of them still reject him. Same thing goes for online dating. Even best men could get only certain small % of women. Still if you are able to get just 1/10 of girls you try to get it would allow you to get unlimited amount of sex.
/r/seduction17/05/19 11:17 AM
1

Bro, it was rhetorical question.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/19 04:25 AM
1

Well, I could disagree with you almost about any point you made in your original post (I've read it now). A lot of guys would fall low enough to fuck a fatty and almost all guys are ready to settle for 7, or at least casually fuck her, because why not? We aren't as choosy in our partners as women, obviously because evolutionary we have lower risks by having sex with new partners. As about everything else - to me all your points seems to be unrelated to the post you answered to.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/19 01:45 PM
1

For woman sex is good as long as it is with high value man. But your value could fall in her eyes when relationships lasts for too long. But overall it is often the case in relationships what man already tired from sex, but woman, on contrary, want it a lot.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/19 01:37 PM
2

You are so right! Before flirting you should ask her "do you want to be flirted with? Stop. Before what, before you talk with her you should make her fill agreement what she is agreed to have conversation with you. Also never touch her before she filled written consent agreement, or else you are sexual harasser. Consent is a king! Even if she is on a date with you doesn't means what she likes you! We guys constantly go on date with ugly fat girls to whom we aren't attracted at all, right? Dude, …
/r/seduction15/05/19 11:37 AM
4

Let me tell you something.. they are lying to you and they actually just want to use you for some sex... truth could be shocking, but... they are probably don't really care about your amazing bonsai collection. :(((
/r/seduction15/05/19 09:47 AM
1

If your objective is to get one date.. then it would be much better to ask out 5 girls once than asking out 1 girl five times. Does it make sense to you?
/r/seduction15/05/19 07:32 AM
3

If LIFE happens to her.. and she likes you... then she will take initiative by herself and either message you.. or offer a meeting.. whatever. Moving on means what if you took initiative and was ignored then you wouldn't repeat your action. If she cancelled meeting you are not trying to get it again - she will invite you by herself if she is really interested. Same with any point in post. Success is about getting girls, not about getting one particular girl.. who is in fact no much different fro…
/r/seduction15/05/19 07:29 AM
2

Move on doesn't mean "fck her, I would never talk to her again", it rather mean what you wouldn't do anything to get with her unless she takes initiative by herself. As OP said - if she IS interested she will let you know it and wouldn't let you move on so easily.
/r/seduction15/05/19 07:22 AM
4

Depends on a person. If she is online 100% of time and just plain ignore you it is one thing. But some people (like me, for example) check out their social media maybe once per day or two.
/r/seduction15/05/19 07:19 AM
1

It seems you just lack some knowledge. Read "We are our brain" book by Swaab, it have a lot of researches about human sexuality. If you want to know "why" then google relevant researches on ncbi instead of some random blogs or forums. Humans are biomachines controlled by brain, sexuality is part of our programming. Sexual plasticity exist, but it is mostly about bisexuality. Most humans are bisexual by nature, but choose to be heterosexual due to social factors. Also sexual plasticity could infl…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/19 04:34 AM
2

Honestly I've just read your first few sentences.. and what I want to say is what gay men are gay even before their birth, in the first place they are gay because their hormones worked in a wrong way during embryo development, so in a sense their brain and hormones a lot like women's. So yeah, it is biology rather than any social bs.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/19 04:37 PM
1

Or maybe his personality doesn't suck.. which is the main difference between guys who get girls consistently and those who doesn't.
/r/seduction14/05/19 04:43 AM
1

You can't get consistent results like this. Most people wouldn't even be interested in going to some bar just to "have fun" because there are other more interesting things to do.. which aren't related to getting girls and wouldn't help you with them at all. The point of taking initiative with getting girls is consistency. You could get new girl every week or more often without putting too much efforts into it.
/r/seduction14/05/19 04:41 AM
5

I have a solid advice for you... Just ask what you are interested to know about her. If you don't want to know anything about her at all.. Then raise your standards, lol. Right questions are sincere questions you care about.
/r/seduction14/05/19 04:37 AM
1

Of course, because we enjoy movies thanks to dopamine. But for women sex isn't dopamine based. THis is why almost all porn created for men.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 02:16 PM
1

I assume she was ugly as well. If you check photos from OPs post then you could see what this "young woman" don't look like a woman at all, based on her body we could see from photos. I assume for ugly and fat women it gives them a lot of satisfaction when everyone believe what they were sexually assaulted, as it proves what they are somehow attractive and there are people interested in them.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 06:37 AM
3

And this is why scenario writers and directors who could make Avatar or Titanic are paid even more than the movie stars. But don't forget what no one cares about your opinion or even about quality of the movie. What is important to movie creators is how much profit they have. For example Fighting Club wasn't successful financially and can't be compared to even shittiest "super hero" movie. Their objective is to make as many people go to cinema and pay their money. They don't really care about qu…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 06:20 AM
1

WTF are you saying? They provide "a little value", but to countless people. This is why popular movies are so profitable. Nowadays value is equal to money. If a lot of people give their money to watch the movie with Hollywood star then it means they give a lot of value. This is also the reason why football players paid so much. They provide entertainment value to countless people and get their % out of it.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 06:15 AM
3

I think what all billionaires should give at least half of all their belongings to poor people! For me in particular, I will ask them nicely and even say thank you very much. What the big deal, they don't need so much money anyway! Why can't they just give some money to poor single mothers with five kids from different fathers? Or to some junkie who owes a big debt to Russian mafia? They are such greedy people, those billionaires... Sadly , but to a lot of people such train of thoughts could act…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 06:11 AM
13

Yeah, that is it. The reason behind it is how our brain work, specifically how dopamine works. Basically it is same reason why most people don't want to rewatch a movie or reread a book immediately after completing it. Even if this was amazing movie or book we still would need some time to pass so what connections in the brain become weaker i.e. you forget about your previous experience to some extent. In men sexual desire is dopamine based, this is why porn is so popular. Most guys can't rewatc…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 05:57 AM
4

You probably never hit on a girl.. at all.
/r/seduction12/05/19 01:40 PM
0

Maybe you start from stopping being attention seeker and just try to enjoy yourself? Work on your social skills. Read Mark Manson's Models if you still haven't.
/r/seduction12/05/19 11:52 AM
2

Exactly. In real world convincing a woman what you adore her and her only is the worst thing you could do. It will work in a movie though. Because ANYTHING could work in a movie, lol.
/r/seduction12/05/19 11:50 AM
1

Then work on yourself and search more.
/r/seduction11/05/19 05:39 PM
1

Check other researches on wiki. Almost all of them tell same number - 20-30%. I assume what 40% is real percentage though, as system is far from being perfect. So this is just one of studies. What really terrible is what some other studies could tell you % as low as 2% - it means A LOT of innocent men were send to prisons.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/19 04:57 PM
1

IDK because I never have had 4th dates, let alone 5th. If you two didn't have sex at 3th date or before then it is either she isn't interested enough or you aren't experienced enough. Like Mark Manson said - why waste time on people who aren't enthusiastic about you? You deserve better.
/r/seduction11/05/19 04:08 AM
3

Just checked it out on wiki. It was 40% because police used polygraph and asked both sides until their account of events matched. This way it was "proved". In all other studies case would be "proven false" only if either victim acknowledged it or if there was some solid evidence like video recording.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/19 05:23 PM
5

I could find this same research in wiki on "false rape" page. The thing is - there is no 40% of cases what "proven false", but 40% cases what were cancelled due to lack of any evidence. In sexual assault reports they could be "proven false" only if a woman herself acknowledge it or a man have had some solid evidence like video recording. ​ edit. No, it seems in this research they just used polygraph until account of events matched. Which prevented most people from lying to the police.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/19 05:17 PM
1

Girls can't like you through text alone. And of course they have all the power. You are the one who writing them and the one who needs them to talk with. They don't need you, there are countless other men who message them. Online she could like you only for your looks, you can't seduce a girl with text. Moreover if you can't meet them then what the point? It is just a waste of time. There is no such thing as "online friendship". Unless you are really very young.
/r/seduction10/05/19 05:12 PM
1

If we talk about real life interactions.. then you are absolutely right. But you forget what in modern world there is online game. And it is won by your look and photos. Then you just should be not too retarded socially. Well, IRL your looks could give you a lot of benefits as well, but only if you have full package and in top 1% of men in terms of looks.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/19 04:57 PM
3

I have seen this happened to one of my friends who looks amazing.. still he was still a virgin at 23. If you have strong frame and attractive personality then you don't need for woman to take initiative - you will create situation himself.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/19 04:53 PM
1

You are right if we talk about cold approaches. Then yes, you wouldn't get laid on your looks alone and personality, frame and confidence are most important things. But on Tinder your looks would be like 90% of success.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/19 04:51 PM
0

Try to translate it to English.. Poshel nahuy uebok v rot tebya ebal. I think google could help you dude, lol.
/r/seduction10/05/19 04:32 PM
8

If she really didn't liked him there wouldn't be third date. In fact it is likely what there wouldn't be even first one.. So she liked him, but he fcked things up. If this guy was more experienced with girls he could probably sleep with her on the first date.
/r/seduction10/05/19 04:27 PM
2

We really talk about the same game? Most important thing in DS is not to get hit by enemy. To achieve it you should dodge.. and to dodge you should react in time. If your reaction time isn't enough then you should learn all attack patterns of said enemy. But if attacks are way too unexpected and fast then it would test your reaction time.
/r/seduction10/05/19 04:02 PM
0

I don't need your tips bro.. if you check my history then you will know what I never ask for tips, I'm the one who gives them. Honestly, to me there is no helpful advices on this sub, still sometimes I could see some posts from people with similar experience to my or give some advices to people who need it. IDK why you associate someone who likes to argue online with angriness. It is just instinctual competitiveness, we argue here for same reason why people like online games similar to Dota or C…
/r/seduction10/05/19 03:56 PM
1

First of all you touch a woman not because you want to get laid.. But because, if you are normal guy, then it means you like touching women and it is pleasant sensation for you.. And, if she is into you, then she will enjoy it too. Why you need a girl who is disguised by you touching her? If she reacts way too negatively and uncomfortable with you touching her then just next her. It basically never happens though, which any guy with some experience knows. If girl is on a date with you she alread…
/r/seduction10/05/19 12:55 PM
5

Dark Souls is even more about reflexes than learning though. For a person with bad reaction time (which is different based on a person because we aren't the same) it would be very hard to learn anything from his mistakes because he just can't react in time and do what he should. I assume same thing could be said about being good with girls. Depending on person you could either learn very fast or be stuck with little to no progress. Recently here was post from a guy who approached 1000+ women wit…
/r/seduction10/05/19 12:24 PM
1

If you talk about this one guy who was upvoted.. Then it is probably because he actually said what part of this post seemed "off" to him. And he even made some small joke about it. See the difference. If you have some solid arguments then you are welcome.
/r/seduction10/05/19 12:10 PM
1

Guy posted some VERY basic stuff. IDK what could be even close to being "creepy" in here. Meeting a girl in a bar? Talking to bar stuff? Touching a girl when she is completely fine with that and expected it from you (it is DATE, for god's sake..). Well if you are man who have some success with women (both in quality and quantity) then please give some advices to newbies. But I'm pretty much sure what you aren't competent enough.
/r/seduction10/05/19 12:07 PM
1

Basically all this post said was.. meet a girl at a date, have some fun and then lead her to your place.. Which is pretty much should be common sense to you if you want to have sex on the first date. OP haven't said anything unique or strange here, just most basic stuff ever. How could it be,in any way, related to rape or be creepy? If a girl don't like him she wouldn't follow him to his place.. or kiss him.. and of course wouldn't have sex with him. So she could EASILY reject his approaches if …
/r/seduction10/05/19 12:04 PM
0

But.. you haven't shared any reasoning behind your opinion. And he asked for it exactly..
/r/seduction10/05/19 11:57 AM
0

This is why there are bunch of other posts from him about how to be more attractive. If you are needy and awkward then you would need some serious luck to have sex on first date.
/r/seduction10/05/19 11:53 AM
1

Honestly, I currently have approach which is so different from anything else you could see in PUA world what it is hard to explain. You could get a glimpse into it by reading my few recent posts, the fact what they aren't so popular could give you some understanding how it is different from what most people think. For me it is I who choose right girls, I don't try to "game" them or get laid with them. I decide who is the best and give them a chance to be with me. I'm at a place in my life what I…
/r/seduction08/05/19 02:48 PM
2

Being in a good form could compensate your unattractive traits and mistakes in your game. Still you wouldn't be able to get hottest girls or a lot of girls just because you become ripped and have amazing body. So if you have zero success with girls then it would give you a chance to get some of them just based on your body alone, though it would be low quality girls and you will fail with a lot of them anyway. Because if you have had needed social skills then you would be able to get girls even …
/r/seduction06/05/19 03:05 PM
1

You are on this sub and don't even know about daygame or nightgame? Those are only ways to get hot girls with consistency. Tinder doesn't work unless you have athletic body and handsome face with photos what represent it in a good way. Because competition is too big and the thing you compete with on Tinder is your photos. The only thing girls care about is validation and be better than other girls, this is why you could get them IRL even if you are ugly and have no money.
/r/seduction06/05/19 06:18 AM
–

Stop this. You could get banned. Also PIMP could be found for free if you know where to seek. It even could be downloaded with torrent.
/r/seduction06/05/19 06:15 AM
1

Lol, meaning of word "praise" is completely different in "praise the god" sentence and it is rarely used anywhere. Like I mentioned in my original post - praising is like a boss praise subordinate for good work, or like dad praise the son for A grade in math. It would be like "oh, well done, good boy". It is about vibe and intonation more than anything else. Also it isn't necessary at all. There were times when I got girls without ever complimenting or praising them. I know guys who don't even t…
/r/seduction05/05/19 05:52 PM
1

It could be different for some guys, but for me personally sleeping with a girl is an exception, not a rule. So if, for example, some 10/10 hot girl offered me free sex I would reject her. In my view I should learn more about her and she at least should put some effort into seducing me. You could make her know what you find her physically attractive, though not in complimenting way, but rather in praising way. Compliment is when you trying to elevate a person so they liked you more. Praise is wh…
/r/seduction05/05/19 05:02 PM
1

Bro you are prime example of reality denier. I'm pretty much sure what you never slept with 8+ girl in real life, maybe you never talked to one even. Or else you would know what type of guys fuck those girls. Example of guys who average twenty five years old 10/10 girl dated: One of the coolest guys from her school who was really fun to be around and was really proficient in social dynamics. One of the coolest guys from her uni who knew bunch of people, including hot girls and was chill and rela…
/r/seduction05/05/19 04:52 PM
0

I'm 5'6 and my face sucks - still I'm successful. And I also have a friend who have same height, but, above it also fat - still most of his EXes are 9/10. I also talked with a guy who is 10/10 in looks (get complimenting all the time, people think he is a model) and he still get rejected a lot in cold approach daygame. He still can get laid now because he learned some social skills and game, but at the start he sucked almost as much as TS. So I can say with authority what you are saying is total…
/r/seduction05/05/19 01:03 PM
1

No, you wasn't rejected because you was too short. You was probably rejected because you wasn't high enough in social hierarchy you was in. If you are coolest guy in the school then girls would be afraid to make you dislike them, let alone reject you.
/r/seduction05/05/19 01:00 PM
1

Yes, but this issue is 100% not about his looks. No matter what looks you have if you aren't needy and desperate looking you wouldn't get 80% rejections before opening your mouth, its just not possible. But if you look as if you want to ask people for some cash then even no matter how handsome you are it wouldn't help. You probably never really did any cold approach pickup.
/r/seduction05/05/19 12:51 PM
1

Such a bs. I know a guy who always was good with girls. He was average looking, but somehow athletic and girls loved him. Then, because of hormonal changes, he become very fat.. And you know what? He still get laid with hot girls. Because of his confidence and fun inducing personality. BTW he is 5'6 and so I'm (in Russia where it is below average height). It means nothing. Being social awkward or confident have little to do with your looks or money. Stop spreading those limiting beliefs which ar…
/r/seduction05/05/19 12:39 PM
1

And why are you there? I'm there because I want to know her. I want to know her because I'm still not sure if she is the girl I'm looking for and if she is right choice for me. Complimenting is a way to say what you already like her, if you already like a girl even before talking to her then it just means your standards are way too low.
/r/seduction05/05/19 04:03 AM
79

As a guy who isn't good looking at all I could say what it is 100% his vibe. I know fat short guys who are loved by extremely hot girls, your vibe and personality is 90% of success. Unless you are on Tinder where you can't demonstrate your social proves, lol.
/r/seduction04/05/19 03:53 PM
14

You shouldn't stay motivated in doing this, in fact most people would stop approach after 100 times if it lead to nowhere. It is obvious what you doing something very very wrong. If you rejected even before talking with a girl.. no, it doesn't means what you are ugly, it means what your non-verbals suck, really big time. Most likely you have very needy vibe. Or else why would they assume what you need something from them and say "no"? Have you ever was approached by a beggar or some other guy wh…
/r/seduction04/05/19 03:46 PM
1

It seems you skipped your history lessons. Through the history of mankind majority of people were always oppressed by minority. Well, things didn't changed much, just now form of oppression changed to more preferable and lenient.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/19 05:39 PM
4

If you are really important to a girl then she would be glad to have your kid even without marriage. For fck sake, there are women who cheat on their husband so what they could raise a kid of someone else. Also there are alternatives to marriage with more freedom for men.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/19 05:35 PM
12

To be more real - she was neither fat nor ugly when he married her, but just check out her more recent photos - she IS ugly and fat after years of marriage or rather after giving a birth, which is the case for a lot of women. So both of you right.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/19 05:27 PM
22

Why not? They could play with their boyfriend together.
/r/seduction30/04/19 05:42 PM
2

If a girl is interested in serious relationships then the only way she can know if guy is appealing is to interact with him, she can't know it from just looking at him. So how could she consciously seduce such a guy if all guys are basically a "black boxes" until you talk to them?
/r/seduction30/04/19 05:40 PM
0

Not likely, she can't know about quality of the gay before she interacts with him so how her taking initiative can change anything?
/r/seduction30/04/19 05:37 PM
4

There is no competition in daygame so try it. If you want to have less competition in a club or a bar then approach girls outside of those places, not inside.
/r/seduction30/04/19 03:06 PM
5

You can get as many guys as you want from Tinder so IDK why you want to have game in the first place. If you are thin and not ugly then you already above threshold at which you could get lots of guys effortlessly. If you want serious relationships then just choose guys you meet more carefully, in terms of how serious and ready to commitment they are, not in terms of "oh, I have such a broad choice, so I could just go for model looking guy who is 99% not interested in relationships".
/r/seduction30/04/19 03:01 PM
3

So it means she never admitted the guilt officially, she just make stupid mistake and she never intended to admit her lies. Some murderers make same mistake even though they risk a lot more, it is just people being stupid and I assume even if she risked years in prison she would slip anyway, after all she isn't the smartest kind of a person. Women never admit their guilt of lie willingly unless they are forced by circumstances. Of course I too think what same punishment would be overdoing it, af…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/19 06:35 AM
6

For signs of physical abuse or drug abuse to disappear it would require a week at least. Why would you wait more than a week after being raped? Would someone will care if you report about being robbed year or two after the incident? No? Why it should be different with rape?
/r/TheRedPill30/04/19 06:30 AM
1

Consent is something what exist inside the head, unless she directly said "please fck me" then there is no 100% proof. And it is absurd what you should prove consent in those cases while it is victim who should prove what sex was against her will.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/19 06:29 AM
1

If person unable to give consent due to their age or physical state then it is considered as rape.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/19 06:27 AM
1

I say it - looks doesn't matter. You could get results either way. Just with good looks it would be easier and somehow faster. It doesn't means what if you are 4 in looks then you can't sleep with an 8 girl. Game is 80%, looks like 20%, at least in real world, no Tinder.
/r/seduction29/04/19 07:13 PM
10

It is under "being drugged" category. Didn't you knew what alcohol is a drug? Also a lot of stealing happens when someone is blackout drunk. I have a great solution for those situations, care to guess?
/r/TheRedPill29/04/19 07:08 PM
6

Logically concept of consent should be ignored in rape cases. Rape is a sex against person's will (when they either resist or unable to resist due to certain factors), not sex without given consent (which can't be proved). So victim should prove what she either resisted (physically, which creates physical evidences like bruises, scratches, etc) or was unable to do so. Even then there would be a room for false accusations because people could hurt themselves and create proofs of physical abuse by…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/19 05:47 PM
15

Maybe because they consider what rape is when you was fcked by a guy who isn't alpha enough and have buyer remorse (which isn't so traumatic, I assume). Real rape which includes drugs or violence and brutal humiliation is just something beyond their imagination.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/19 05:44 PM
5

Such cases should be dismissed even before getting to the court though. It doesn't make sense what you could accuse someone without any evidence and then go to court and waste judge's time on this bs.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/19 05:41 PM
9

When real rape happens then in most cases there IS physical evidence because victim either was drugged, blackmailed or forced physically. How could you rape someone without any of those three methods? Well, maybe there are ways but they are way too hard to accomplish.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/19 05:37 PM
11

You saying it as if now a lot of women cancel their false accusations because they feel guilty or whatever. Woman wouldn't tell the truth even if it means what she just would be viewed in a bad way, so results the same. No matter how tiny this punishment would be they would never acknowledge their lies, so it doesn't really matter. Case you mentioned is a proof of it btw.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/19 05:32 PM
4

This is exactly why most guys don't approach women. They expect bad results and so they avoid activity whatsoever.. And this results in them never having any progress.
/r/seduction29/04/19 05:13 PM
0

When you have casual relationships with a girl you expect what she wouldn't have anyone else or something? Also girl who cheats on one guy could be faithful with other, it depends on how important he is to her. Not all girls date guys they truly love or care about, most of them have bf who is "fine before I find someone better".
/r/seduction28/04/19 05:48 PM
3

Most guys here think it is relationships advice sub, not seduction sub about pickup, i.e. sub mostly about how to get laid with a lot of different girls, not sub about how to find his perfect wife.
/r/seduction28/04/19 05:46 PM
-1

Lol. Do you really know (or even heard about?) even single guy who consider it fine for his gf (in case they are in serious relationships) to sit on another guy's lap with her ass on his crotch? Unless he have cuckold fetish, then I don't think it is acceptable. But the fact is - for most girls bf means nothing. From comments on this sub it is very obvious what most guys who answered here slept with less than 10 girls in their entire life, or else they would have better understanding about girls…
/r/seduction28/04/19 05:44 PM
4

Lol, I think what in every city there a lot of people who earn enough money to provide for ten families without any problems, after all there are businessmen, politicians, etc. I personally know such families. Just they are minority and it isn't something common.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/19 05:37 PM
34

I live in Russia and this is kind of bs. Women who expect men to pay for them are minority, adult women who don't work are even more rare. In modern Russia family can't survive on one average salary, so most men marry women so what it was easier to live with two people's earning and, as a bonus, to have someone else to do chores like cooking and cleaning, lol. Yes, most married women in Russia both earn money and do chores. Often wife can earn even more than her husband and still it would be she…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/19 06:19 AM
1

Its because most guys who think like me don't even bother to click on this shit-post.
/r/seduction27/04/19 09:54 PM
0

You aren't very smart, are you? It is just bs feminism video. On #metoo women report all sorts of flirting as a bad thing, Gillette ads demonize masculinity, etc. This news is just one of the first waves of this bs in 2015, most likely it is done based on popularity of "anti-Julien" campaign. You acting the same as people who assume what if woman cries rape then it is 100% was rape, not just her EX dumping her. We don't know situation at all, stop talking nonsense. Women know situation, yep, but…
/r/seduction27/04/19 09:48 PM
35

I named this "chooser mentality" - always think from position of the one who choose, because it is truth - it is you who choose with whom you want to be. Don't be so sure what a girl is to your liking, stop judging purely on her looks, instead start to judge her based on her actions. My personal mindset is "I want to spent some quality time with a girl, but not each girl is qualified, I choose who I want to and if no one meets my standards then I rather would be single". Of course how she acts w…
/r/seduction27/04/19 09:37 PM
1

Are you psychic or something? How do you know if it was right circumstances or not. You know nothing about this situation, lol.
/r/seduction27/04/19 09:25 PM
20

Sitting across is the best position to touch a girl in social situation because all you need to do in this case is to maintain solid eye contact and take her hands inside yours, that is it. You don't need to touch her legs, her shoulders, etc, until you two are isolated, on contrary it could make her anxious because other people could see you.
/r/seduction27/04/19 04:13 PM
4

Your questions is - things you could have done instead.. The answer is - leading her to your place, or find an excuse to go to her place, that is the only thing what matters on a date if you want to have sex. Kino is overvalued, you could do fine without touching a girl at all. Though if you still want to touch her and sit across of you then just take her hands inside yours, play with her hands - unless you already at your place any overly sexual touching could make things go wrong way and put h…
/r/seduction27/04/19 04:10 PM
2

This sub slowly but surely become dead. No one in the answers understand what "I have a boyfriend" isn't rejection, or what girls who have boyfriend still could be interested in other guys and very likely to cheat with them. I assume what 90% of people here are either virgins earning for answers to "how to get laid" or guys who were lucky enough to get one-two girlfriends and think what they now know everything about women.
/r/seduction27/04/19 04:05 PM
0

Do you sleep only with women in their thirties or something? Acting "childish" and playing games is just type of flirting to young women. If you don't understand it then I'm pretty much sure you are inexperienced with women.
/r/seduction27/04/19 04:02 PM
1

My point is it depends on circumstances. You people treat it as if such action can't be appropriate never and no matter what, which is bs. With my friends I do things to them which could be considered much more "offending". We have only her side of the story which means nothing at all.
/r/seduction27/04/19 03:57 PM
1

I'm more surprised what you was able to spam approach for so long than anything else, it isn't like I try to make fun of you or something, lol. По поводу вк ты канеш прав, девочки там были 6-8/10, из тех 9 и 10 которых я знаю они либо не сидят в соцсетях почти никогда (раз в несколько дней/недель заходят) либо общаются лишь с теми кого знают ИРЛ. Поэтому daygame и рулит что открывает доступ к лучшим, но и уровень сложности куда выше.
/r/seduction26/04/19 06:27 AM
2

Yeah, he should find some submissive friends as well, lol.
/r/askTRP26/04/19 06:11 AM
1

Good news for you - no matter how strong a person is he can't fight against a gun.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/19 09:52 PM
1

It isn't like she wants to marry him or live together forever.. For now she just want to seduce him. Also some men are as good in their 60-ies as some other guys are in their 40-ies, it depends on your way of living and genetics.
/r/seduction25/04/19 06:32 PM
1

If he staring at you then it is likely what he likes you. Of course he wouldn't try to flirt with you or get you into his bed, after all he is your teacher and he could lose his job in worst case scenario. Also it is likely what he is married it could be a deal breaker, some men never consider cheating even if they want, after all consequences could be terrible. If you just can't give up on him then don't even try to flirt with him openly when other people see you together. First of all you shou…
/r/seduction25/04/19 06:30 PM
2

As someone who in the past was a seller who sold things what aren't so good ( ups..) I could tell you what it isn't true, lol. As with women the most important thing isn't confidence, but your non-neediness and image of your product as something desirable by others. No matter how confident you are, but if you are persistent and desperate it would make it harder to sell anything or be attractive. You should act as if it is THEY who need your product and it is you who choose who is worth it to get…
/r/seduction25/04/19 06:21 PM
1

I'm not some sort of bodybuilding trainer, but I personally know a lot of guys who lifted weights in a gym and basically all obese guys gain strength and muscles fast enough (faster than skinny guys like me or OP), while losing large percentage of fat as well, so I can't see a reason why someone should start from weight reduction, unless they are unable to do even basic physical activity. Honestly I consider weight lifting as much more simple and less time consuming form of exercise than, basica…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/19 05:43 PM
1

Lol, from what I remember you are this one guy who fcked only 5 (?) girls after approaching 2000+? I live in Russia too and, honestly, I can't understand how you can have such low success rate and why you was just doing the same thing over and over again without trying to learn game properly (there a lot of resources after all). Some of my friends got more girls from picking up in vkontakte and they have had higher success rate as well. Also it isn't nice thing to say someone "guys, girls from y…
/r/seduction25/04/19 05:33 PM
1

I think the point of the post is what bigger cities are much better for daygame, lol.
/r/seduction25/04/19 05:28 PM
1

I know about body-mind system and this is why I advice to start from lifting. If your objective is muscle hypertrophy then having stronger body-mind connection wouldn't help you, but, to some extent, will slow you down. Exercises done not exactly by muscles alone, but also by using nervous system, i.e. a person with strong body-mind will be able to have higher level of strength with smaller muscles, decreasing in this way muscles involvement in the process, which isn't exactly a good thing to ma…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/19 06:46 AM
1

Well, no. Humans aren't designed for monogamy, we have multiple sexual strategies at once, including cheating/polygamy, which are actually more effective depending on circumstances. For beta male best strategy is monogamy, for alpha male - polygamy, for female - cheating.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/19 08:35 PM
1

You could build more muscles after one year in a gym than after three years of callisthenics.. Considering what you hit a gym two hours a week and do callisthenics for hour daily..
/r/TheRedPill23/04/19 08:20 PM
3

Exactly. Why the fck you even listen to women and their opinion? Women want someone who is higher value than them and higher value person don't give a shit about her opinions, he is the one who judge and qualify her if she is good enough to be with him. Guy is in a frame of "I'm good enough to be with you, girl?" instead of being the one who is judging her value. Being fit and athletic is, sure, demonstration of high value, but it isn't determining factor here, it just gives you more opportuniti…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/19 08:10 PM
1

Lol, why would you want a girl to think about herself as beautiful? Do you understand what women want to be with someone who they consider above their league? So if she isn't considering herself to be a beauty it is much easier for her to accept your higher status and do anything to get you to be with her. Also she is probably right and she isn't so hot compared to other woman. For needy guy who can't get laid even 5/10 girl would be hot, but unless she is delusional she understand her real plac…
/r/seduction23/04/19 07:44 PM
-21

Lol what? Chocking is very common practice in rough sex, why did she considered it offending if they already flirted for a long time? It isn't like he threatened to her in any way, unless he actually did. Anything can be appropriate depending on situation, frame and vibe.
/r/seduction22/04/19 10:07 AM
5

Just declare yourself as female and then you can fuck as many women as you want without being afraid of any rape or sexual abuse charges because women never could be abusers.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/19 05:45 PM
3

Soon people start to immigrate from first world countries to second world countries just because of stupid crazy laws.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/19 05:43 PM
3

How exactly? Maybe you will write a step-by-step guide "how to save your country if you are just average dude"?
/r/TheRedPill21/04/19 05:41 PM
1

Not all sex is same. Sex with someone who truly wants you is much more enjoyable and fulfilling than paid sex. And sex with a girl who barely knows you is even better because it is a proof of how much she is attracted to you, especially so if she rarely do it and usually takes a long time before having sex. And, honestly, sex is even better when a girl cheats with you because she wants you so much what it is above her other feelings.
/r/seduction15/04/19 06:01 PM
2

Don't chase girls, chase results. The difference is what you could get result with many girls, it means any one of them is replaceable and you don't care about losing one particular girl. So if you want sex you trying to find a girl who is suitable for fulfilling your desires, if she is unable then you will find someone else. You don't chase girls, but chase your desires.
/r/seduction15/04/19 05:55 PM
1

Guy who could protect them from street violence.. is a guy with a gun or pepper spray.. Strong fighter is a guy who will protect her from violence.. and then have a high chance go to prison or to hospital. Even more - sport wouldn't make you strong fighter in 90% cases, unless you learn martial arts. Being good at basketball wouldn't make you much stronger after all. Moreover this have nothing to do with girls because they don't make their choice based on rational thoughts and moreover if you ar…
/r/seduction11/04/19 05:24 PM
4

No, he date 3 girls because it is much more fun, sex is much better when you have variety and, as a bonus, it also makes you much less needy. If you don't fuck multiple girls and really like the only girl you date then it is just a matter of time before you become dependent on her, specially if you lack ability to get new girl fast in case your princess dumped you or cheated on you. It isn't matter of choice or psychology, it is about your hormonal status, when your only source of female attenti…
/r/seduction11/04/19 01:28 PM
1

Winning a gold medal is same level as playing a Fortnite. Actually if we talk about professional sport then E-sport (dota for example) is more profitable nowadays.
/r/seduction11/04/19 12:25 PM
1

People make efforts to gain things for the sake of sense of accomplishment, not to get real results which are mostly useless even IRL. So it isn't exactly "false sense", sense is real, but anything else isn't.
/r/seduction11/04/19 04:51 AM
2

Meeting and fucking new women isn't too time consuming, it would be at most 2-3 hours a day in case you have sex for more than one hour. A lot of people waste much more time a day on games or netflix. For guys who are good with women from first meeting to sex it would take 1-2 hours and after that you could meet a girl just to fuck and don't waste any time on anything else. You still would have a lot of time for anything else.
/r/seduction11/04/19 04:48 AM
2

Most important thing is to stop at LMR stage or you could become gay.
/r/seduction10/04/19 06:38 PM
1

In my current position I don't care if she is into me, what I care is if she meets my standards or not. You can't have low self-esteem if you are egoistic and consider your own needs above hers. After all you approach and make efforts not for her sake, but for your own - why would you care so much if she is into you or not? If she can't provide me what I want from her then why I need her in the first place and why I should care about reasons why she can't give me what I want? I just find someone…
/r/seduction07/04/19 08:19 PM
1

The point is in most cases so called "meaningful relationships" are just result of a guy being inexperienced and needy. Results as follows - girl either cheats on your like in OP case or she is socially restricted to do so (can't cheat because she will feel too guilty and it will go against her worldview) and instead end up having a family with you. When you become good with girls sex loses its magic and emotional connection is harder to get because you no longer have delusions about female natu…
/r/seduction07/04/19 06:52 PM
4

You can't know if he said something bad to you though.
/r/seduction07/04/19 06:45 PM
1

Because trying to figuring out if a girl likes you is a weak and needy. Instead you should develop your own standard and see if she meets them or not. It is fundamentally different approach and hard to achieve for newbies who don't have self-respect or standards.
/r/seduction07/04/19 06:42 PM
13

Lol, reread this post. Guy just parodying those who can't understand when a girl is interested in them even when it is plain obvious.
/r/seduction07/04/19 06:41 PM
1

Those people just want to share their pain and sadness because it makes them feel better. They don't actually want to solve their problems, they just want some attention.
/r/seduction02/04/19 06:02 PM
5

Can't you see what over-investing in answering to any random critique is counter-productive? What you are doing now is validating yourself. It isn't much different from trying to explain yourself when a girl shit-testing you, it just lowers your credibility and subjective social value.
/r/seduction01/04/19 04:08 PM
9

He would be luckier if he didn't fucked a crazy woman. He installed cameras because he knew what she is crazy and he assumed what with it he was completely safe, but reality proved otherwise. Even with definitive proofs it still costed him a lot to prove his innocence.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/19 05:55 AM
1

There are a lot of men who PAY to see women masturbate. And when it is a man who masturbating and women watch then he is pervert and doing "sexual misconduct", they even call it harassment.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/19 02:41 AM
1

I googled photos of those women. I feel sorry for Louis. :( Chaturbate was created too late.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/19 04:16 PM
6

This is bs. Girls talk about their ex to add their subjective value. It is just bragging. There are different girls and they act differently with guy they are interested in. The thing is you don't need to care about her interest in the first place, don't try to be a psychic and just assume attraction. Also main point is what usually girls aren't really interested in a guy until he have had sex with her. And after sex level of interest become high by default. What you said is legit when a girl co…
/r/seduction28/03/19 04:23 PM
1

If you have clinically diagnosed autism or retardation then ok. Just give up, get some hooker or meet below average girls. What is the problem? Life isn't about getting laid, there a lot of things more interesting than that and actual difference between physical enjoyment of sex and masturbation isn't so great.
/r/seduction28/03/19 04:08 PM
2

Feminists are retarded.
/r/seduction28/03/19 04:05 PM
1

Tinder has nothing to do with pickup. Even if your friend have amazing looks he wouldn't get a lot of girls this way. At most it would be some 5 and 6, moreover less than 1 out of 10 matches. Having good looks is enough to get below average girls from Tinder - yes. But it doesn't mean what there aren't other ways to get laid which are better.
/r/seduction28/03/19 04:03 PM
2

You don't understand the point of pickup. Pickups is a numbers game. Even if you look like Apollo you still would be rejected a lot. If you are ugly you still would get laid a lot. It is action what gives you results. Looks help you, but nothing could help you if you do nothing. Which is the problem of 99% of guys. And PUA coaches do everything to make you take action - this is their work.
/r/seduction28/03/19 04:00 PM
2

BS. I'm Russian and it took me about one year to learn how to read (and understand) most English books without dictionary. And it took me about 5 years to reach same level in Japanese language using same method of learning. English is easy to learn, but it doesn't mean what it is easy to master though.
/r/seduction28/03/19 03:51 PM
2

Englsh is 1 of t mst lzy lnguags inth wrld. The fact what you understood what I said proves it.
/r/seduction28/03/19 10:20 AM
1

You could just skip 1-10 and start from 11 and you will get results much faster, lol.
/r/seduction28/03/19 10:16 AM
1

" If a girl was 23 years old, I honestly feel like a creepy old perv wanting to ask her out." Lol what? There are guys who are twenty years older than you who fuck girls in their early twenties. There is nothing "perverted" in desiring young girls, it is abnormal not to want them. You are only 3 years older than she is, it is beyond absurd to feel like this. Also there are a lot of guys who bang girls while still living with parents and without having a job. Your age and your financial problems …
/r/seduction28/03/19 08:03 AM
1

I checked your profile just to know if you are man or woman. It is funny what guy who was abused by narcissistic woman can't accept the fact what currently western society is feminised. I bet what your abuser never get any punishment and you consider it as normal. In Russia where I live it is close to impossible for man to be abused by woman because men are stronger physically and have right to self-defence. You wouldn't go to prison for hitting a woman who attacked you or provoked you and socie…
/r/seduction18/03/19 03:48 AM
0

Even when world famous people were falsely accused of rape or sexual assault their accusers didn't get any significant punishment. There is no much law could help you because in western world women are always in right both legally and socially.
/r/seduction17/03/19 04:22 PM
1

Unfortunately there is no much cases when false rape accusers get any punishment for it. This is why false rapes are so common in western world nowadays. You could make other person's life miserable without any risks.
/r/seduction17/03/19 04:21 PM
1

Post it on relationship advice channel or any other with much more active users than here.
/r/seduction17/03/19 04:05 PM
1

Of course you would need to communicate even if you want only sex. But it doesn't mean what you need to enjoy communication or valuing it. Wanting just sex means what you aren't interested in being friends, having romance or deep emotional connection. Those things are unnecessary in this case. It isn't about treating people as shit or objects, it is about value you expect to get out of relationships. There is seriously something wrong with you if you don't consider good sex as something valuable…
/r/seduction15/03/19 06:25 PM
1

The thing is - all people like casual sex because good sex is enjoyable by itself. But a lot of women wouldn't acknowledge it and so they rather lose the chance to get some pleasant experience than being considered as a slut.
/r/seduction15/03/19 06:13 PM
1

I don't agree neither with your nor him. But from what you two said it is pretty much obvious what he is someone who regularly get girls and you are not. People - both men and women, could enjoy "just sex" because biologically sex is one of the most strong pleasures humans can have. WTF dude, you should change sub if you want to talk about "objectification". Wanting to have only sex with people has nothing to do with "treating them as objects" and all this concept was created by feminist to demo…
/r/seduction15/03/19 06:04 PM
2

Key to solve LMR isn't in giving her logical reasons, it is in making her too horny and emotionally excited to care anymore. What she wants to know isn't if you will just have her for one night or not, it is to know if it is fine for her to fuck you without feeling herself a slut. You are being way to serious about this stuff. And most likely there weren't many girls, I could assume what it was just one or two, because if it were more then you would be more experienced already and wouldn't ask f…
/r/seduction15/03/19 05:54 PM
4

It isn't "just primal instinct". If you fulfil your reproductive necessities (and your brain decide it based on how much and how hot women you fuck, it don't care about actual kids) then your organism would release endorphins, a lot of them, and obviously it will make your life feel much more fulfilling. On contrary if you restrain your sexual urges then cortisol would be released in large quantity which is why guys who can't get laid often tend to have depression and low self-esteem, moreover w…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/19 04:24 AM
3

Oh lol. I've seen 5'5-5'6 guys who slaying pussy, unfortunately they weren't bald. Of course there are "basic requirements", but they are much lower than most guys think. Reaching top 20% in looks it doable for 90% of average guys, all it takes is time and effort. Of course there are people with terrible genetics - with disfigured faces, with extreme obesity, etc. For them it would be almost impossible to become Chad, but who said what life is fair? But even them could get some average girl at l…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/19 04:00 AM
1

I can't see from his post any disgust to what he saw. He just see reality for what it is and use it to his advantage.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/19 06:04 PM
3

You are so delusional what when you see direct proof of your worldview being wrong you still sure it is not and even try to tell others what reality they experienced is delusion.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/19 06:01 PM
5

Chance what her bf shoots you is much lower than chance of you dying in car incident. At most he will try to provoke a fight if.. a. he find out about cheating(which is rare), b. he find out what it was you (which is rare), c. he will find you in person (how?), d. you look like a weakling (go lift), e. can't hold your frame (how you get laid with a girl then?), f. he isn't afraid to go to prison (girls rarely cheat on such aggressive guys because they could be hurt too if he snaps).. As you coul…
/r/TheRedPill14/03/19 05:52 PM
12

Please.. Learn more about STDs before preaching about them. A lot of people, specially women, have lip herpes (like..MOST of them). The thing is - it is in inactive phase almost always, it is active and visible at most 1-2 weeks a year when your immune system is weakened. Majority of humanity have some sort of herpes and it doesn't have almost any consequences with very rare exceptions. If you fucked more than 10 women (which isn't a lot at all) then you already fucked someone with lip herpes an…
/r/TheRedPill14/03/19 05:33 PM
1

Regular dudes get pussy from their social circle and by committing to girls. Guys who get laid a lot have right mindsets and actions naturally, like OP's buddies.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/19 05:09 PM
1

Being too shy to talk with girls isn't same as freely expressing yourself without care about them.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/19 05:05 PM
2

The key to game and to women is to be able to demonstrate your non-neediness and indifference actively. If you can't give a girl a chance to be with you, can't give her opportunity to chase you when you want, then you will get results only in certain circumstances.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/19 05:02 PM
1

Saying hi doesn't show any sexual interest. Believe it or not, but girls can't be sure what you like them unless you are being way too obvious like giving compliments, being needy or directly telling her "I LIKE YOU". One of my jobs was related to giving "love advice" to women and most common thing they ask is "this guy flirted with me and was fun, but I'm not sure if he likes me". If a guy approached hot girl it could be obvious to you what he is interested in her, but she wouldn't be so sure b…
/r/TheRedPill14/03/19 04:43 PM
1

I'm pretty much sure what you restrict yourself sexually. When you aren't restricting your sexuality from the get go then friendzone is impossible. Looks have nothing to do with that, I'm 6/10 at best. Being open, being outcome independent, don't give a fuck about being liked - it IS already attractive. I'm pretty much sure you being social, but you aren't being polarizing. It isn't just being comfortable talking to people. It is about being comfortable even if it could make other people not com…
/r/seduction14/03/19 02:05 AM
1

Facepalm.. Is the only thing I could answer to this nonsense.
/r/seduction13/03/19 05:43 AM
1

So you can't understand why being outcome independent, confident and socially free is being attractive for anyone? Read Models from Mark Manson, half of the book he explain why exactly being like this is attractive. And no, you can't be attractive to all women, no matter what. Daygame statistic of "best pua guru" is only 3-5% success rate (i.e. how many girls they sleep with). I know a guy who just directly approach women and invite them to his place, he have 15% lay rate and I have similarly hi…
/r/seduction13/03/19 05:16 AM
3

Here you are, just by mentally implementing right mindset you could think of something which would be considered as "great opener" in terms of pickup.
/r/seduction12/03/19 03:08 PM
1

It is a problem when you hold yourself back because you afraid of being disliked or get negative reaction. It doesn't mean what you shouldn't hold yourself back when your actions are crime or something completely socially unacceptable. Unless you are autistic or retarded then you can understand the difference easily. If I want to touch a woman then I will do it without any problem, but I also start from socially acceptable things like holding her hand, hugging her, etc. Not because she could dis…
/r/seduction12/03/19 03:00 PM
0

So you can't see why basing your mindset on something which contradicts to reality isn't the best idea? Well, good luck with that. On practice, when you actually will be in the field, you will see what things don't work this way. Of course approaching a girl to "make her day" is better than approaching her to "trick her into sex", but you shouldn't base your mindset on anything which is related to her reaction, unless you want to feel strong anxiety and discomfort afterwards. In reality having "…
/r/seduction12/03/19 02:42 PM
0

It isn't really good mindset. Because there are always would be some boring or rude girls who would react negatively, it would contradict to your assumption of "making her day" and then next time it would be harder to approach.
/r/seduction12/03/19 01:53 PM
1

Exactly. Also - be best version of yourself. But for yourself, not for others. It means what it is you who choose criteria of "being best version of you". Unfortunately most guys would never reach this place even after reading Models, or my post. They are in "I SHOULD GET GIRLS" mod and only interested if you promise them what it would help them get laid easily. This is why in Models, after Manson talking about being non-needy, polarising, etc, he still have many chapters with traditional advice…
/r/seduction12/03/19 01:38 PM
0

How many times you interacted with a woman or any person from frame of "I will do and say what I want, I'm not here to be liked by you"? How often your actions demonstrate to women what you don't care if she leaves, don't like you, etc? Stop lying to yourself. If you feel desire to approach someone will you? If you feel desire to touch someone will you? Are you able to honestly express yourself and what you want? Mm? If you see attractive woman on the street would you approach her? Why not? Eith…
/r/seduction12/03/19 01:29 PM
1

It seems you misunderstood context of my message. It means to do and say what you want when you already interacting with a woman. If when you see attractive woman there is no part of you what wants to approach to her and talk to her then I'm not sure what you are heterosexual man.
/r/seduction12/03/19 01:22 PM
1

Sorry, but this sound like bs. There are studies in which it was proven what women can get sexually excited physically even when they watch monkey porn. Google "human women excited by bonobo". Escorts may carry lube with them for many reason (for example anal sex), but not because their vaginas can't become wet from random ugly dudes. Though I assume if guy is very unskilful then it could take him some time to make woman "erect", but it depends more on actual actions and skills than his looks. M…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/19 05:37 PM
1

Men cheat.. when they can't make a woman accept the fact what they want and would fuck others. From male perspective perfect relationships are ones where you could sleep with other women freely, but your favourite woman stays faithful.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/19 06:26 PM
1

You can't be "bumped" if you haven't committed to a wrong woman.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/19 06:20 PM
12

Exactly. If we give a woman perfect male partner then she wouldn't even want anyone less than him. If we give a man perfect female partner then he still would want to have other women in his life, even if they are inferior to his partner.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/19 06:18 PM
1

You missing one big point. Women could be sexually excited by almost any man. Men can't. Most men can't get any erection if woman is fat or ugly. Women would be wet even if guy is ugly. We have different physiology.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/19 06:11 PM
1

Oh lol. I was interested in NLP about 8 years ago and probably tested more techniques than you know about. The point is - NLP is unscientific and more than 90% of its concepts are bullshit with everything else borrowed from real facts which were known to scientists 30+ years ago. Instead of "educating" yourself about NLP you should learn neuroscience which is a real science and completely based on researches and facts. Currently neuroscientists know how brain works for the most part, they know t…
/r/seduction10/03/19 05:23 PM
1

Oh lol. Do you ask each girl if she has something contagious before you have sex with her? Or was you ever asked about this kind of thing? Most people, like you, are completely misinformed about STDs and afraid of them, but the fact what a lot of people are ignorant doesn't make their point of view right. So I don't understand your point. Honestly, what you are writing here is such a nonsense what I don't want to answer to all points you made because they are just ridiculous.
/r/seduction09/03/19 04:57 PM
3

Outcome dependence is when you are hungry, open refrigerator and find out what there is nothing eatable in it then you would be like "oh no, it is terrible no, now I will starve to death" and then next time when you are hungry you too afraid to open refrigerator because it could be empty.. Outcome independence doesn't mean what you don't want to eat, it means what if there is no sandwich then you could eat something else, if there is nothing to eat you will go and buy it, it means what for you i…
/r/seduction08/03/19 06:28 PM
1

Do you really think what there are people who born confident? Being shy, caring about what others think, etc - it is all conditions what could be changed. His problem isn't blushing, blushing itself means shit. His problem is caring about what others think about him way too much. His problem is putting women on pedestal and feeling his inferiority to them. Also most people who consider themselves "depressed" aren't depressed, they just have negative self-talk which is CONTROLLABLE. I was like th…
/r/seduction08/03/19 04:10 AM
0

Ugh.. what kind of person never heard about Gilltete's failure to bring feminism to masses? At least google a little before answering nonsense.
/r/seduction07/03/19 05:51 PM
1

If you could find answer for yourself then you would be just one step from solving your inner game. Why would you approach a woman if you don't need to be liked by her or get certain reaction from her? Find the answer and everything else will be easy.
/r/seduction07/03/19 05:49 PM
1

And I even wrote up this "ANYTHING" what really matters and what any guy could provide to a woman.. Maybe you try to reread my message? If you can't make woman feel emotions or give her orgasm then you should work on it, it isn't hard and you don't need looks, money or status to provide those values to her.
/r/seduction07/03/19 05:45 PM
1

Let me guess - you are one of the people who consider Gillette's commercial as "video to help men"?
/r/seduction07/03/19 05:45 PM
2

Oh lol. Your problem isn't blushing but your view of human interactions and your view of women as well. If a person with confidence is blushing and someone point it out then he will just laugh it off and this is how you deal with ANYTHING. Stop treating interactions with people so seriously, for god's sake.
/r/seduction07/03/19 05:43 PM
2

FUUUCK. Those stds are practically harmless and easily treatable, unless you live in Africa. Based on what you wrote I could only say what you need to learn more about stds, same as 99% of people who afraid of them. Google "mark manson stds" if you are too lazy to search all studies by yourself. In modern world stds aren't as dangerous as pregnancy. Making a kid with wrong woman could ruin your life much more likely than any std. Also - it is more safe to fuck 200 women with condom than 10 women…
/r/seduction06/03/19 03:01 PM
1

The point of first exercise should be to list some sort of value you could provide to a girl. To feel what you are offering her value instead of taking it one sidedly. In context of seduction values you should provide are - emotions (which you give her by teasing, push/pull, etc), sexual enjoyment (which you give to her by making her orgasm in sex), a chance to have relationships with you and.. that is already more than enough to get just sex because you already offering her more than she offeri…
/r/seduction06/03/19 02:55 PM
1

It is common knowledge what most women who call themselves feminists nowadays are just sexist who hate men. They talk about toxic masculinity, call our sexual desire for women "objectification" and call innocent men rapists..
/r/seduction06/03/19 02:52 PM
1

You are blushing, not farting. What is wrong with that? Approach her while blushing, why not?
/r/seduction06/03/19 02:49 PM
1

These top PUA either do very low investments approach which screening girls way too fast, or their ability to attract women is very very low.
/r/seduction04/03/19 05:44 PM
1

You are right, but you are wrong. You are right what most "pickup gurus" have only about 3% success rate. But you are wrong what "best PUA" have success this low. https://www.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/9ock2a/my_daygame_experience_so_far_statistics_and/ Guy who just started will have similar statistic as well, but for experienced and not creepy guy 5%+ is easily achievable.
/r/seduction04/03/19 05:38 PM
1

More than anything "inner game" is your worldview, not meditation and what you do for life. If you think what girls flake because of your looks then it is already means what your worldview is flawed. First of all are you doing daygame or nightgame? If you do later then obviously your numbers would be flakes, lol. In nightgame the only way is to have same night lay. BTW in daygame it is preferable as well. If you can create some connection and attraction in daygame then instead of just getting # …
/r/seduction04/03/19 05:21 PM
8

There was guy few months ago who have had sex with 4+ women after starting cold approach daygame for a little more than a month. Obviously you will get laid from cold approach, lol. If you are good then fucking 1 out of 10 women wouldn't be hard.
/r/seduction04/03/19 05:12 PM
1

You are 6-7/10 like most guys are. The point is you could get girls with your looks alone only if you are 9-10. And looks would make things much harder if you are 4/10 or lower. Otherwise it is 100% your personality and actions. How many girls you asked out? If less than 30 then it isn't wonder you are virgin. How many female friends you have? How many cold approaches you did? How many times you tried to get a girl from a nightclub? How much you know about seduction at all? Did you read Models f…
/r/seduction03/03/19 04:07 PM
2

You can't understand simple fact.. Being attractive and doing things to be liked by someone isn't related things. If a girl belittled me in teasing non-offensive way it wouldn't make me less attracted on her, on contrary it would set up more relaxed and laid-back, it would give me opportunity to tease her as well - it is what we call flirting. Also if you need to add "oh, just kidding" then your non-verbal communication is bad. It should be obvious what you aren't serious or offensive from HOW y…
/r/seduction01/03/19 04:18 PM
2

There is difference between what we "think we will do in situation" and what we actually do on practice. There is no many girls who will say what they would be attracted to guy who don't treat them seriously, tease them and just having fun, but on practice it is what most of you would be attracted to.
/r/seduction01/03/19 04:08 AM
2

Did you have any close buddies or friends in school or college? It is normal to tease and belittle each other in funny ways. Social dynamics doesn't work logically. By logic belittling others is bad and complimenting them is good, but on practice things are different. Main point of teasing and being challenging is to create dynamics where you two would be equals with you in leading position. Woman can't feel any attraction to you if she don't consider you as her equal or superior. In courtship d…
/r/seduction27/02/19 01:29 PM
4

If you tell a man "where to go" just because you don't like what he teasing you it tells more about you than him, you know. Being confident, being in lead, being in command - it is what work with feminine and gentle women. It sure could backfire with "confident" women, which rather should be called masculine than confident. We guys aren't "respectful" with people like our friends or family, we could joke about silly things, belittle our friends in funny ways, do you really have any attraction to…
/r/seduction27/02/19 01:23 PM
2

Having casual sex with random girls is now definition of being a douche? How her being unfaithful to her bf could affect in any way possibility of being fuckbuddies with her? And maybe I will reveal here shocking truth, but most girls with bf always in search of someone better, most of them date guys just not to be a "girl who can't even find a bf", it is rarely when they date someone out of love. There is nothing wrong with that, most of those boyfriends would stay virgins if girls only choose …
/r/seduction24/02/19 06:01 AM
1

Really loving gf would never cheat, if a girl is possible to steal then you saved guy from her if their relationships were "ruined by you". You can't ruin healthy relationships because woman would never cheat in them, dude.
/r/seduction24/02/19 06:00 AM
0

It isn't like he will date or marry her.
/r/seduction23/02/19 04:52 PM
-3

Another guy who never consider casual sex? Seddit is no longer about pickup and sleeping with a lot of girls, it is now a sub "how to find a gf and stop her from leaving me", "how to get my oneitis", "easy tricks to make your crush like you", soon it would be another "relationships advice" sub.
/r/seduction23/02/19 04:50 PM
2

Women don't act that way when they aren't sexually attracted to you, never. With friends who are unattractive to them they will act completely different and any guy with just a little of experience could sense the difference. The thing is just because they want to fuck you (not "date", why you even use this word?) it doesn't mean what they will, eventually it is up to you to make things happen in a way she wouldn't feel like a cheating slut.
/r/seduction23/02/19 04:46 PM
1

If you want to have sex on conscious level then it isn't desire, it is a decision. Also all of this pointless because in the first place you shouldn't think like "does she likes me, is she interested in me?", it makes you needy and all you need to know is either she compile with what you want from her or not. There is no objective to be liked by a girl, you just make things happen and they either happen or not, for whatever reasons. The worst thing you could do is consider what each time things …
/r/seduction23/02/19 04:34 PM
1

So? The point is to know your level of interest, not how I personally will view her. Also - even if it is turn off for me it doesn't mean what I will rate her low. For example one guy's ten could be other guy's seven, but it is impossible to have "one guy's ten other guy's three" situation, unless one of them have extremely unique taste like being into fatties or hating women for their race. In most cases if a girl is nine for you then she would be at least seven for majority of guys. Same rules…
/r/seduction22/02/19 10:59 AM
1

Wanting to have sex with someone ISN'T decision, it is emotion which is uncontrollable with conscious mind, so no - if people find someone as sexually attractive they want to have sex with them. On the other hand for women your physical beauty isn't necessary means what you are sexually attractive to her, you could fail everything with your actions.
/r/seduction22/02/19 10:56 AM
-3

How to properly respond ISN'T something what you could learn with KNOWLEDGE, it isn't science. His examples would mean NOTHING, unless you understand why he act certain way on deeper level. The fact what you thinking what there is "ideal response" is proving what I was absolutely right in understanding your problem.
/r/seduction21/02/19 01:43 PM
1

No, this IS solution in your case. How to stop having oneitis? Take action what will make it unnecessary. Be attractive person instead of trying to attract someone who don't care about you.
/r/seduction21/02/19 12:06 PM
8

Lol. You can't just imitate tinder messages of this guy and get same responses. Instead learn his mindset and stop giving a fuck about "saying the right thing".
/r/seduction21/02/19 12:02 PM
1

Your description is bs. Most of female attractiveness comes from her face, if she have perfect face then it is a matter of preference which figure you want from her - some guys love high girls, some prefer short, some guys like big tits, some prefer small, I, for example, love when a girl have pale skin so your "black marble" description is a turn off for me. I think I need to make this point again. This rating system is same as rating system of imdb. There are deviations in it depending on pers…
/r/seduction21/02/19 11:56 AM
2

Like having master/servant roleplay where a girl would play a role of your slave, like having rape roleplay,, like having cheating fantasies, incest fantasies, etc - all of those are rather common practices and most women enjoy it a lot even though it isn't broadly accepted in society.
/r/seduction20/02/19 04:54 PM
2

You are so innocent, there is nothing to villainize here, most guys want the same thing. Most people would do much more amoral things if they were given absolute power. Like fucking a wife while her husband forced to watch, torturing those who offended you in the past, raping someone who rejected you, etc.
/r/seduction20/02/19 04:49 PM
1

IDK I think what "she was SOO fucken hot" tells you less than "she was 9/10 in looks". Physical descriptions though could be more accurate, but it isn't easy to describe girl's face which could be difference between 6 and 10. If we talk about simplified rating then 4 points would be enough: 1. Never fuck. (1-5/10) 2. Good enough to be fucked, but still reluctant and wouldn't tell friends about it. (5-6/10) 3. Want to sleep with her and wouldn't be ashamed of it. (6-7/10) 4. Really hot, want her!…
/r/seduction20/02/19 04:09 PM
1

Then I agree with you because if you have such physical problems which are close to level of disability then it would make socialising "super hard level" kind of thing, lol.
/r/seduction20/02/19 04:06 PM
5

Getting out of friendzone is really really simple. Go fuck other girls who not friendzoned you! And here you go, you have girls without being friendzoned! Simple, right?
/r/seduction20/02/19 07:46 AM
2

Just read the Models by Manson.. Rather than challenging you could call it "polarizing", it means you aren't afraid to put the girl off by expressing yourself.
/r/seduction20/02/19 07:43 AM
-1

A lot of people feel shitty just because they : a. Drink alcohol more than they should (more often than once per month is already initial stage of alcoholism). b. Eat shitty food. c. Have too many other addictions like gaming, porn, etc. d. Don't have enough physical and social activity. Basically if you lead healthy lifestyle then most of your "psychological problems" would be solved by themselves. Humans ARE bio-machines and our inner chemistry affects our feelings more than any "post trauma" …
/r/seduction20/02/19 07:40 AM
1

This was very cocky, change your intonation pls.
/r/seduction20/02/19 07:33 AM
3

There are overweight guys who could get hotties though. Thinking in terms of "league" just restrict guys from going for girls they really like. If you are 6/10 in looks you could still get hottest girls, just less effective than more goodlooking guys.
/r/seduction20/02/19 06:22 AM
2

Those who look to improve don't ask for advice because more than enough info already was given on this sub. All you need to know to get results is already here. Also solving "particular situation" isn't something what makes you improve, it is wrong concept in the first place because there is no guaranteed solution for any situation or for any girl, but there is a way to win numbers game which is dating in a nutshell.
/r/seduction20/02/19 06:18 AM
1

Numbers are more objective and allow better understanding for other people.
/r/seduction20/02/19 06:16 AM
1

Intonation of any words could be cocky.
/r/seduction20/02/19 06:16 AM
1

Attractive person = person with whom you want potentially to have sex. Desire isn't equal to "intention". If she find you attractive then she wants to bang you by definition, but it doesn't mean what she actually will, because of social conditioning, because she could value her relationships, etc. But a lot of girls don't give a fck as long as they are attracted enough. There is no such thing as "just enjoy good looking people without considering them as sexually attractive".
/r/seduction20/02/19 06:14 AM
2

I think it is more effective to understand structure and inner place from which all this comes, rather than some canned lines. Canned lines would be useless if they delivered wrongly or you fail follow up shit test which could be completely random and unpredictable. Freedom from outcome is rather mindset and a feeling which comes from this mindset rather than some techniques. The best part of freedom from outcome is what you wouldn't be hurt by rejection and move on easily, it will save you from…
/r/seduction19/02/19 02:29 PM
3

You will see a lot of contradictory advices in this case. Women can't understand their inner working because it is much more obvious from outside perspective. They will tell you what they think they want, not to what they actually react in reality. For example if you ask the guy what he wants from the girl then he could give you a lot of unnecessary info, while in reality for most guys it is enough if a girl is physically attractive to some extent and approachable.
/r/seduction19/02/19 02:26 PM
1

How complimenting someone and asking for number could be considered douchy or arrogant? =\ He didn't say "hey bitch, give me you number right now!". Also a guy who telling someone to piss off from picking up a girl who isn't even his yet is real douchebag both to other guy and to a girl. Unless it wasn't "picking up", but rather real harassment.
/r/seduction19/02/19 02:21 PM
1

Honestly from what I could see most guys live in a dreamy world here. Women cheat and they cheat specially often in the west world where she lose nothing by cheating (she still could divorce rape the husband) unless she really loves her husband which is rare. If you sleep with a lot of girls then some day you will fuck married chick (even if you try to avoid them they still could hide the fact they are married) even if you don't want to, it is just result of probability. He downvoted not because…
/r/seduction19/02/19 02:19 PM
2

You could measure your subjective attraction on 1-10 scale, same way as you could measure your enjoyment from the film you watched even though art is subjective as well. You could treat 1-10 scale same way as you treat imdb. Yeah, some people have very peculiar tastes, but overall there would be correlation in rating.
/r/seduction19/02/19 02:09 PM
2

You are sure not very experienced with cold approach. There is no such correlation. "Not so hot" girls tend to be more bitchy, specially if you start from complimenting them - they wouldn't even believe you. And ugly girls? A lot of them HATE all males on the earth and they know what it is almost impossible for any guy to be interested in them, they would react terrible even if you just being friendly, some of them will scream about sexual assault if you just look at them wrong way. "Hot girls b…
/r/seduction19/02/19 02:05 PM
1

There is a difference between "I would never fuck this girl", "well, she is kind of fine" and "oh wow, I want her, she is amazing", so 0-1 scale is clearly bs.
/r/seduction19/02/19 02:02 PM
4

This sounds strange for sure.Because instead of following advice from guys who already got results you want for yourself you instead asking people who never even tried to get any results in this area. Women don't understand anything about getting a woman, most of them even never tried.
/r/seduction19/02/19 02:00 PM
2

There is no contradiction here. If girl gives you non-verbal signals of being interested and still tells her she have boyfriend then it is because she is interested in you even though she have boyfriend. Girls cheat on their bf all the time, it isn't rare nowadays.
/r/seduction19/02/19 01:51 PM
3

Even "wrong moves" could work. They are wrong not because they never work, but because alternative to them is way more effective statistically.
/r/seduction19/02/19 01:49 PM
5

Alternative - tell (command) her to kiss you. Work wonders if you have dominant frame.
/r/seduction19/02/19 01:48 PM
12

I already feel sorry for him.
/r/seduction17/02/19 04:22 PM
6

I don't think this is right, first of all this guy already fucked her friend and have had other attractive girls around him. He wasn't exactly beta and, honestly, if he was more persistent he would be able to fuck her too even back then she wasn't really interested.
/r/seduction17/02/19 04:20 PM
5

She said herself what he already could get girls more good-looking than she, so obviously he wouldn't be needy and act as if it is the end of the world. I think you described the situation perfectly. Friend zone is mostly about guys who either can't get girls at all or have "oneitis" and so they suffer. If you attractive guy and have sex in your life then you can easily be friends with girls without caring about them not fucking you. And eventually they will do this anyway because you are fun an…
/r/seduction17/02/19 04:19 PM
1

90% of those who "wants more and not DTF" are just inexperienced guys who are new here or just delusional about women. If you want to find someone who is really suitable for you, the best girl out there in personality for you, then you would need to fuck a lot of other girls before you find her, there is no way around it. You can't truly know a girl before having sex with her, so even if you want to find meaningful relationships then it is unavoidable to have bunch of sex friends and ONS before …
/r/seduction16/02/19 01:57 PM
1

Instead of getting numbers try to start leading her (physically by taking her hand, verbally by telling her something like "lets go to a cool place nearby") if she follow then you two are on "insta-date", if you tried it few times and she don't want to follow you because she is busy then arrange next meeting and only then get the phone, just so what you two could let each other know if your plans changes. Getting just a # without arranging the meeting is lame and ineffective, it should be your l…
/r/seduction13/02/19 02:25 PM
1

This is a step you will skip more and more often with getting experience. It is more reliable to have insta-date or set up future meeting immediately instead of just getting the # and then trying to meet her later. No matter what you do % of flakes would be too high.
/r/seduction13/02/19 02:20 PM
1

Instead of "can we exchange numbers" - "tell me your number", if you want to be polite then add "please", but never ask her permission for anything.
/r/seduction13/02/19 02:18 PM
1

If you try to set up instant dates with girls then you will be shocked how many of them actually don't have anything important going on and even could go to your place within hour after first meeting. It would be higher % of girls who you could lead to your /her place (though LMR would be more often, you should work on comfort when at your place) if you just start leading them instead of getting the # and going to typical date. Phone number should be your last resort if a girl is really busy now…
/r/seduction13/02/19 02:14 PM
1

In the best case if she isn't busy when you approached is to make instant date with her, actually for experienced guys have same day sex is more effective than getting a number and setting up a proper date later (because even if a girl like you now it could change later and here you go - flake).
/r/seduction13/02/19 02:12 PM
1

First of all asking for number is lame and not effective (you will get tons of flukes) - you don't just ask for #, you offer her to meet you again and number is only needed so what you two could decide when exactly this meeting would be. Or you could arrange this meeting from the go. The best case of course is instant date - there is zero flake possibility if she likes you and have free time when you approached her.
/r/seduction13/02/19 02:10 PM
1

WTF are you talking about? Most men wouldn't talk to a woman after they directly told what she don't want to speak with anyone and not interested in them. Also you are talking about all of this as "terrible experience". Talking to member of opposite sex who is interested in you isn't terrible experience even if you yourself isn't interested in them. Being rejected by someone you like (and treated without any respect given) - that is terrible experience indeed. The wording you use is as if she is…
/r/seduction12/02/19 03:25 PM
3

Real objectifying is thinking something along lines "women are just sex holes and there is nothing more to them" and then treat every woman like this. Everything else - like feeling sexual desire, wanting to titfuck female stranger or friend, wanting to have group sex with bunch of cute girls, choosing sexual partners based on their looks, etc - isn't objectifying. Well yeah, as a men we want to bang girls - it is absolutely normal and only retarded feminazist would consider it as something toxi…
/r/seduction11/02/19 05:19 PM
1

You are too lazy to even google? Of course I have a link to the study. http://indiana.edu/~sexlab/files/pubs/Chivers_Seto_Blanchard_2007.pdf You could read different articles with summary and interpretation if you google "study women excited by bonobo" or something like this. Women basically excited by any sexual activity they see. They don't have any "I only want someone physically attractive" kind of response. Think about why prostitution exist- because most women could be sexually aroused by …
/r/seduction11/02/19 05:13 PM
4

Showing what you are sexually interested in someone, trying to know them better, complimenting them - it isn't disrespectful behaviour. Telling people to fuck off, being rude or cold, ignoring people - it is disrespectful behaviour. Treating people who like you and attracted to you as if they are shit not worthy of any respect? If we reverse roles then you will say what a guy who tell "fuck off" to a girl who likes him is terrible asshole, but it is considered as acceptable when it is woman who …
/r/seduction11/02/19 05:07 PM
2

The easiest way to start implementing it is to try differentiate person's eye colour and then trying to see reflection in their eyes.
/r/seduction10/02/19 05:31 PM
0

I'm talking about most women. Obviously for any guy there would be a girl who will like him a lot for random reasons. For example a lot of women are really into guys who have looks similar to woman's father. If you want to attract women solely based on your looks then you should be in top 5% of genetics which is why it is most unreliable way. For woman to attract guys solely based on her looks.. well it is enough not to be ugly or fat. If we talk about sexual attraction and ability to sexually e…
/r/seduction10/02/19 06:57 AM
4

All guys want hot girls, no matter their height. If you are slim and have cute face then 90% of men would want you - it is as simple as that. For guys things are more complicated - it isn't enough to be above average in looks, you still would be rejected by most women for random reasons. You either need to be top 5% or have attractive personality traits which are harder to cultivate than just looks.
/r/seduction10/02/19 05:13 AM
0

Sorry but yeah, there are short Indian kids who are pulling hot girls. Swedish models are too rare to be considering as example, but looks scale is very individual - a girl who is ten for one guy would be seven for other guy. You could fuck hot college girls even with below average looks - it is a fact proven by countless men. IDK why people give a fuck about a girl being a model or whatnot, ordinary waitress in a cafe could be hotter than some models or porn actress. Women biologically don't re…
/r/seduction09/02/19 06:32 AM
1

No, they are not. Your worldview is really fucked up.
/r/seduction08/02/19 05:11 PM
3

Also guys don't forget what those Chads he is talking about are 9-10/10 in looks and such guys are very rare - even so girls with same level of looks would get x10 times more attention from men. Good looks wouldn't get you as much results as having attractive and proactive personality- which could be developed.
/r/seduction08/02/19 04:14 PM
1

It doesn't work for millions of people. Online the only way people could choose is based on photos because text means nothing, it isn't honest signal (so for example if you write on Tinder what you are millionaire no one will believe you even if it is true). You could get some girls below your league if you are good looking and use a lot of your time on Tinder - it is true. And if you aren't top 10% in looks based on your photos then Tinder would be hopeless place. Unlike real life where women c…
/r/seduction08/02/19 04:11 PM
0

It is enough to be average or a little above average. Dirty ass bum is a bad example because he is basically on the bottom of social hierarchy. Even if you are a little below average dude then things would work fine even if you are short, skinny / plump and have bad style, as long as you aren't too ugly or disgusting.
/r/seduction08/02/19 04:00 PM
2

Fuuuck.. Potential mates is ANY woman YOU find attractive. It has nothing to do with them liking you or not. Males abundance come from the fact what attractive women AREN'T unique - there are countless women you want potentially fuck and some of them would be good enough to date. If she isn't interested in you then you could leave at any moment because there are countless other women out there, not because there are women who like already like you.
/r/seduction08/02/19 03:44 PM
1

When guys say this they regret being indecisive, not changing their evaluation of a woman. For us sexual attractiveness of a woman is purely physical aspect. For them other than physical it is emotional aspect which is even more important. This is why she could go from friendzoning a guy to trying seducing him just because of learning something new about it.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/19 05:11 PM
1

Any guy who have decent results with women, be it a pua or naturally attractive guy, know what I say is the fact. We have this community with bunch of theories about seducing a woman because when you trying to do it they resist. It is a role of someone who is being seduced - resisting, don't be too easy. When you reverse roles all resistance disappear.
/r/seduction07/02/19 03:27 PM
1

For men abundance isn't amount of interested women, it is amount of potential mates. So if you could freely approach any woman then you have abundance because you have unlimited pull of women you are interested in. Being in abundance it is when instead of trying to be liked by specific girl you searching and choosing right one among those you contact.
/r/seduction07/02/19 03:23 PM
1

Women usually become very invested after the sex if they want to have relationships with a guy. Then they could do 90% of the work. Women rarely take initiative, most of them unable to do it even if they like the guy. Don't forget what even most guys are too afraid even to approach a female stranger, women are even less ballsy than we are and for them getting laid isn't so important.
/r/seduction07/02/19 03:18 PM
1

Can't relate to you at all. For a lot of people texting isn't something important. I could log in social media, answer to all messages and then just leave for few days. It has nothing to do with rudeness or power - I'm just not really interested in texting more often than once in a few days. And I definitely can't relate to the post itself because it is other way around for me. Even if I like the girl I still can't really care about online talks. I got tired from this shit when I was 15 years ol…
/r/seduction07/02/19 03:15 PM
1

Yeah, I live in Russia so this is very surprising to me. We don't even have a word with meaning equal to "creepy" you use here. Because there is no "metoo" and feminazism women here don't consider being hit on by guys as something terrible - most of them love it even if they aren't interested in the guy. On the other hand if you can't hit on a girl without her considering you as a creep then there is something wrong with you, not with your attempt to court the girl. If you are hitting on a girl …
/r/seduction07/02/19 03:08 PM
0

Rather than being seduced women want to SEDUCE (and win other women). If you could understand this simple fact then your ability to get women will raise tremendously. Make woman feel what it is SHE who seducing you and everything would be simple. Other than pre-selection married man is also a challenge - stealing a man from other woman, seducing him. You could create this type of challenge even without having gf or being married.
/r/seduction06/02/19 07:17 AM
0

WTF are you saying lol. What type of "threat" is that? "Threat of you hitting on them", my ass. People hate being manipulated. If you trying to be just friends with them you are either not attracted to them sexually (which they don't like either), or manipulating them using friendship - so of course there would be a friction. If you are honest with your feelings to them then there wouldn't be any. And of course it would be easier to get along with dudes, after all gender differences are real and…
/r/seduction06/02/19 07:12 AM
-5

There is nothing fucked up here though. It is same as saying what that it is fucked up when a girl instantly become more attractive to men just by changing her looks to the better.
/r/seduction06/02/19 07:07 AM
5

While it is true what abundance mentality making things easier, but not in this situation when people themselves take initiative to contact him. This thing is called pre-selection, basically if a man could get hot girl it is assumed what he is at least as high value as she is - so people start to see him as someone important. Social value of a woman is mostly based on her looks and could be discerned with just a glance, but for men our social value is based on what type of women we could attract…
/r/seduction06/02/19 07:05 AM
1

You really believe what "successful" people who do all of this are getting laid effortlessly? A lot of guys struggle with women even after getting amazing body and sort of interesting life style. You could be billionaire and still stay beta loser with women like Elon Musk. Being good with women and being good in life isn't same thing, but sure those things could compliment each other.
/r/seduction03/02/19 03:52 PM
2

I think what your " You will not know self respect until you’ve gone through the pain of not respecting yourself." Is misleading. If it were like this then your post would be meaningless. People could learn from their own mistakes or they could learn from mistakes of other people. Of course a person should acknowledge what his current mindset is wrong, it isn't easy, but easier than learning after doing same mistake over and over again. If you aren't idiot then why would you go making mistakes k…
/r/seduction03/02/19 03:48 PM
1

IDK why you are downwoted. This exactly picture was posted here less than a month ago. =\
/r/seduction03/02/19 03:42 PM
1

There never would be a point in time when you will think "ok, now I already the best version of myself", or "ok, now I'm good enough". Not until you just accept what "I'm good enough to get girls I want". Which you could do at any time or could do never, no matter how much you will improve yourself. If you want get girls then it is better to accept what you are enough now rather than later.
/r/seduction03/02/19 03:41 PM
3

When someone tells you it within first hour of meeting you it wouldn't be called a friendzone.
/r/seduction01/02/19 03:41 PM
6

If this is cringy then what about doggystyle or blowjob? Lets call it what they really are. Your definition is three words instead of one so it is much worse. Also your definition is way off, it has nothing to do with loss of romantic interest - it is when guy want to fuck girl, but instead of proceeding with fucking he befriends her, still without chances to get laid, in worst case he would be used by a girl as her little friend without benefits to him.
/r/seduction01/02/19 03:40 PM
20

The problem is more deep than this. When guy is "interested in a girl" he is actually interested in getting validation from her - a proof what she consider him attractive (if she thinks he is attractive he would feel good, if she consider him unattractive and creepy he will feel bad), so to achieve what he wants and avoid what he don't want his brain start to correct his behaviour patterns so what he avoid things what could potentially turn her off. So he starts to change his behaviour to impres…
/r/seduction01/02/19 03:28 PM
0

Scarcity in reality? When you could approach as many women as you want? When you could have unlimited sex access as long as you have 5% effectiveness? All guys have abundance reality, they just can't realise it.
/r/seduction01/02/19 01:36 PM
2

Being seduced by girls isn't about them taking initiative. It is sort of mentality which is very counter-intuitive. They seduce you by being hot and physically attractive and you take action because they make you by being attractive. On practice it would look similar to Shock and Awe Fool's mate game by Ciaran - which was rather popular years ago, but forgotten because most guys just don't have balls and experience to pull it effectively in real world. Girls want to feel what it is they who sedu…
/r/seduction01/02/19 01:24 PM
9

Why you want to be friends with someone who is distant and cold to you? Stop lying to yourself and others. If your male friend acted like she did - would you ask advice how you reconnect with him? I don't think so. You are needy and desperate, to the point of accept just being friends. Well, answer yourself honestly - if she currently told you "I was wrong about you, I love you so much and want you to bang me" - would you refuse? I don't think so. There is only one working way to return ex. Forg…
/r/seduction31/01/19 01:08 PM
0

Everything what purposefully leads to sex could be considered as part of seduction. I personally advocate not seducing girls, but instead being seduced by them which is much more advanced and effective concept. But most guys wouldn't understand it anyway so for them pickup is the most effective way.
/r/seduction31/01/19 12:33 PM
8

The point of this compliment isn't making a girl "like it". The point is to make her unsure if you like her or not, if she already "got you" or not. The point of most pickup techniques like push/pull, qualification, etc isn't doing something what girl will like, but being a challenge, making something to make her guessing about you. The point of seduction isn't making a girl like you, but making her react emotionally in a way what leads to sex. It isn't the same.
/r/seduction31/01/19 03:08 AM
11

The best openers are ones what could be misunderstood. Best compliments are those what isn't obvious if they compliment her or not really. For example "your eyes are beautiful, left one especially" would work much better than just "your eyes are beautiful".
/r/seduction31/01/19 01:46 AM
1

Not exactly "no one else", just if you have such results it means you did something fundamentally wrong - you don't have foundations I mentioned or don't try to build them. Most likely you sound not sincere and not confident when approaching women, also you probably putting them on pedestal and don't make them experience emotions, don't being a challenge, don't do push/pull, etc. If you did at least some things right then there should be results, if not lays, but at least some make outs with gir…
/r/seduction31/01/19 01:44 AM
2

It isn't about personality.
/r/seduction30/01/19 03:52 PM
1

Agreed - I never think about dying, but I'm afraid what it still should happen to me one day. :(
/r/seduction29/01/19 03:25 PM
4

There are no psychic abilities, girls in particular don't have them. It is hard for me to imagine what someone who did at least 500 approaches can have any problems if he know some fundamentals like eye contact, confident body language, strong voice tonality, teasing, etc. Approaching 10 girls a year in a nightclub isn't equal to "two years of cold approaching".
/r/seduction29/01/19 04:58 AM
2

There are men in their 40's who still sleep with 25-35 years old women.
/r/seduction28/01/19 04:36 PM
1

They should be disappointed for not meeting amazing man just because their only criteria for choosing someone online is photos. Why the fck she should be disappointed by meeting someone she likes a lot just because he isn't so hot looking as he was online? She would be glad, not disappointed. You can't understand because for men the only criteria of sexual attraction is woman's looks - if she isn't so hot online it will make her less attractive by default. But for women it is different. She coul…
/r/seduction27/01/19 03:53 PM
2

If we talk about quality for serious relationships (not quality for random hook up) then he is right (to some extent). Why a woman who is conservative and interested only in serious relationships would be on Tinder in the first place? Most likely she will find a boyfriend among her social circle and that is it. Tinder is mostly hook up app for people who want to have casual sex or for girls to get some validation if they don't get enough of it in real life. If you searching for good wife then ig…
/r/seduction27/01/19 11:03 AM
1

Why you need quality woman if you just want to fuck someone sexy?
/r/seduction27/01/19 11:02 AM
1

You still could use some game on different platforms other than Tinder.
/r/seduction27/01/19 11:02 AM
3

Can you understand simple fact what women choose guys differently in real life compared to online? Online your photos are 90% of success. IRL your looks are less than 30% of success. Unless you have 5% top genetics then most girls will fuck you because of your confidence and personality overall, not how good your looks.
/r/seduction27/01/19 11:00 AM
0

You are too easy to hurt, bro. Less than a month ago you posted "stop being assholes in this forum" just because someone was rude to you. Also you trying to look like a guru who mentored a lot of guys, while just a month ago you still struggled with being physical to the girls. I'm not sure about what post with legit strategies you did (because it doesn't exist in your history?), but I don't think what you could tell here something new. Don't forget what 95% of people here are newbies or just gu…
/r/seduction25/01/19 08:17 PM
18

I don't think there is any conspiracy here. And I'm Russian myself, so I can say what similar things start to happen in my country too. For example few years back there was a big case where a guy was put in the prison for "raping" a girl (Shurygina case, google "How Russia Turned on a Teenage Rape Victim" for some basic understanding, lol) when to all country it was obvious what she wasn't raped, but just was a slut (still guy was released after less than a year instead of proper four and only o…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/19 05:18 PM
2

Being dominating in sex isn't exactly about this. You could be very dominating by just commanding her to do what you say and when she do then she enters submission frame. It is much more powerful than dominating her just physically. Some girls don't like to be treated roughly (most of them do though) but it is hard to find a girl who wouldn't like being commanded in bed by guy she loves and respect. Just submitting to you could make most of them wet as fuck.
/r/seduction24/01/19 10:24 AM
1

If we talk about options then it goes as following: Men have limitless options when they choose a woman to pursue. Women have relatively broad choice to have sex, but only among those men who choose to pursue them. Men have an option to either commit to a woman or not after he have sex. He could just leave. So basically woman should either choose a guy who have high sexual market value and so his genes are valuable even if he don't stay with her. or guy who would be ready to commit to her after …
/r/seduction24/01/19 10:19 AM
5

Lol, after hundreds of comments you changed your perspective? Congratulations.
/r/seduction23/01/19 08:03 AM
5

Todd would never give advice like "you are only 20 - instead of getting girls do something else".
/r/seduction23/01/19 08:02 AM
1

It isn't hard to fuck some girls at 20. It would be harder to fuck 30 girls a year, true, but most guys just want to get laid here and there. It is easy to achieve. Competition is weak because most guys suck with women no matter their age.
/r/seduction23/01/19 08:01 AM
1

It has nothing to do with being emotionally uninvolved. If you enjoy sex one time then you could enjoy it second time. Unless you do it solely for validation, to add +1 to your diary of fucked girls which is extremely lame.
/r/seduction22/01/19 06:24 PM
5

Never understood this ONS mentality when you are yourself turn down girls after fucking them once, just because of some stupid principle even if you enjoyed sex with her. Even if you aren't interested in LTR you could still have casual sex with her and be friends.
/r/seduction22/01/19 10:24 AM
1

Well, start it from saying what you are fine if she have other guys, instead of starting from saying what you want to bang other girls. If you are uncomfortable with her meeting other men then you shouldn't even try all this friends with benefits thing. And if you are comfortable with it, then start from making her know.
/r/seduction22/01/19 10:22 AM
1

IDK, some guys I know use their phone to make video or photo while fucking, just for fun. You definitely could take your phone to use stopwatch and check how much time it took to get her cum. Actually you could stimulate both clit and g-spot at the same time with just one hand. But of course 7-8 second is a bs unless girl already was very wet and earning for fuck.
/r/seduction22/01/19 10:19 AM
1

Most girls could cum within 2 minutes with Hitachi Magic wand - that is registered fact. For most women it takes as long as 15 minutes because most men aren't really skilled. Actually on average women don't even cum while having sex and most men can't even last for 15 minutes.
/r/seduction22/01/19 10:13 AM
1

You should learn some neuroscience instead of psychology. Association cortex exist to control you in spite of what other parts of your brain thing. Even if there is discontent it wouldn't impart your mental health, it is what actually makes us humans different from other animals - our ability to rationally control our behaviour. But it could as beneficial to us as harmful. For example when you control yourself to approach a hot girl in daygame you help yourself, when you restrict your desires be…
/r/seduction22/01/19 06:07 AM
1

It can overwrite it - neocortex exist to control our biology. But it isn't healthy, don't lead to happiness and not enjoyable overall. For example religion could make people stay virgins for life and considering it as a blessing - what is it other than "overwriting biology"? But it wouldn't make you happier and wouldn't make your life better in most cases.
/r/seduction21/01/19 02:10 PM
1

Men and women are biologically different. Women on average are less competitive and more submissive, most of them are on masochistic side of SM and dream about being controlled, raped (in fantasies of course) or dominated in any other way. It isn't my opinion - you can check relevant studies online if you wish. Woman can be a leader among other women, or in social situation - but she wouldn't want to be a leader with a man she consider as sexual partner, no matter how confident she is. Unless sh…
/r/seduction21/01/19 02:07 PM
1

They will definitely want and enjoy the sex, but just physically, not emotionally. Depending on a man and his libido physical aspect of sex could either be very important, or not at all. Most guys go get sex for validation. But some of us, especially the younger guys, want to have sex everyfucken day and with variety of women. There is nothing wrong with him wanting to get know each other.. If this is his real desire instead of his social conditioning which he use to suppress what he really want…
/r/seduction21/01/19 02:01 PM
2

The point is you can't build emotional connection with ALL and ANY women, only with those who are compatible to you in terms of personality. While you can fuck a girl even if you have zero compatibility, fucking a new girl is always adventure and interesting - this is why some guys slept with 100+ girls. Unless she have amazing personality or bed skills then you will lose your interest very soon.
/r/seduction20/01/19 05:22 PM
3

It happens majority of the time because most women aren't really interesting. When you have a choice to have relationships with different people then you will find out what most of them aren't interesting to you personally other than having sex. That is how it should be, it is a good thing. You should get to know a girl - after the sex. If she is unable to interest you then it is because of her, not because of you. Most guys invest emotionally in a girl they don't really like just because they a…
/r/seduction20/01/19 05:19 PM
1

Guys care about rejections because they take it as something about them instead of something about a woman who rejected them. You don't care about dog or a kid because you understand what there is nothing wrong with you and they are the one strange to react this way. Same should be the case with women. If she rejects you while you knowing what you are attractive then you perceive her as being strange one, not you. Imagine what you are hot model girl and some loser virgin not interested in you. S…
/r/seduction19/01/19 02:44 PM
1

Nah, in long term relationships it is serotonin addiction. Dopamin is at work when you feel sexual attraction. Also - there is nothing more than chemicals, humans are biomachines controlled by the brain - it is a fact proven by neurosciences over and over again. Also there is no difference between what I'm talking about and open relationships. They are just open for guy and "close" for girl because she don't even want anyone else if she really likes you. Women don't want your sexual commitment, …
/r/seduction19/01/19 02:38 PM
1

Do you understand what flirting to a lot of different women is attractive? In this test she trying to check if you are popular with a lot of women, or desperate to be with her alone and ready to commit. If woman start to think what she is more important to you than other women then she will be in position to decide rules and getting her would be much harder to you.
/r/seduction19/01/19 05:07 AM
1

Lol, deeper connection. Do you understand what people are bio-machines and there is nothing other than chemicals inside our brain? What you call "deep connection" is just serotonin addiction. You just choose one brain addiction over the other. Also I assume what such men exist, in theory, but I never meet one or heard about one. 99% guys in monogamous relationships just can't get laid without it consistently. Best guys who are really attractive and have a lot of choice would have their girlfrien…
/r/seduction19/01/19 05:05 AM
3

The point of the nightgame is to pull a girl for the Same Night Lay while she is emotional and wants you. It isn't very effective to get dates. Try solo daygame instead - it is harder, but it more likely to give you solid interactions.
/r/seduction18/01/19 04:47 PM
-1

There is no biologically monogamous people because natural sexual strategy is same for everyone and determined by certain structures inside your brain. Of course intellectually you could even become a monk and being monogamous isn't so much different - using your intellect to go against your nature. I don't tell you what it is wrong thing to do. But most men become pseudo-monogamous just because they can't get laid consistently - it is just a fact. If you could get new girl every week then it is…
/r/seduction18/01/19 04:41 PM
3

No, you are not guilty of anything, just going against your biological desires. There are monks who "want" to stay virgins for life as well. But there is difference between your natural biological desires and those what created by your social conditioning. You are sure as fuck want to settle and don't want to have a lot of women because of your view on "what is wrong and what is right", not on your physical desires.
/r/seduction18/01/19 03:40 PM
-1

Why would a guy who could get laid a lot will settle with one woman for a long time? Having more than 8 partners isn't making you worse and less suitable for LTR, you just don't need it in the first place. Of course with women it is a little different - if she have 7+ partners is just means what she is easy to change guys, so it is more likely what she will get new guy when she get tired from old one - even if he is her husband. Most marriages last long thanks to kids, desperate people (who can'…
/r/seduction18/01/19 03:37 PM
-1

The more I read you the more I think what you aren't really autistic. Autistic people don't even care if they have communication with people in their life or not, they not enjoy communication and completely fine without it, while you care about women so much.
/r/seduction18/01/19 03:31 PM
2

Getting one girl was much easier twenty years ago. Getting hundred girls is much easier now. Percentage of guys who can't get anyone was raised. So is percentage of guys who fuck 100+ women.
/r/seduction18/01/19 03:29 PM
2

Percentage of guys who make 6 figures are far less than percentage of guys who get laid with hot girls. But they not necessary overlap. So some guy who is broke could fuck a lot of hotties and other guy who is millionaire could get laid. Example - Elon Musk.
/r/seduction18/01/19 03:27 PM
1

It seems you haven't seen the video and haven't read the comments. Also I don't think it is "creepy" to approach a girl even if you did it not immediately. For example I have a bad eyesight so often I approach a girl when she already pass me. I don't care, if she is turned off by it then it is her lose, not mine.
/r/seduction16/01/19 04:35 PM
-2

At least this "stopping guy" from screenshot is rather attractive. At least for gays he would be..
/r/seduction16/01/19 04:34 PM
2

Most people wouldn't approach anyway. To cold approach people you should be a person with a pair of big balls and if you are like this then you wouldn't anything other than disgust towards this add. This add wouldn't be damage to seduction community, it is already a damage to Gillette popularity and most people, even those who are far from being red pilled or knowing about seduction, consider what this ad is stupid shit which discriminates males. I could say what effect of this add was making pe…
/r/seduction16/01/19 04:33 PM
1

I personally don't care or even think about all of this. My objective isn't to make girl mine, impress her or "get her". I choose right girls for my purposes, that is it. If you are ready to move on at any moment, to leave her alone at any moment and end interaction and instead do what you want and how you want then it is real outcome independence what makes you confident and attractive. If you always think about how to be attractive to her and what course of action is the best to get laid then …
/r/seduction16/01/19 11:54 AM
8

The point is to text as minimum as you can. If a girl text you a lot and you rarely answer it is her investing in you, which making her more attracted, not less. You are not supposed "to be obviously into her", if a girl sure what you are into her and really like her before the sex then it is fail and could kill attraction alltogether. She shouldn't be sure if she already got you or not, she should do some chasing too, why would she chase you if she already got you completely? If she initiate a …
/r/seduction16/01/19 10:47 AM
1

Good old commercials are usually about cool guy(with a lot of money and high status) who get bunch of girls, not about being friends with women and respect them, definitely not "you are bad boy, here is how you should be a good boy". Unconsciously guys want to be wealthy, have status and fuck bunch of women, beta or not - it is in our biology.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/19 08:46 AM
4

If you meet her IRL and created enough attraction then you could easily kill it with texting. Make a phone call if you want to revive your interaction after a long time.
/r/seduction16/01/19 08:14 AM
12

It means what you haven't created attraction. Creating attraction in person is much easier than via text. And not all guys like texting. If you don't then you shouldn't change yourself for her, it means you are putting her on the pedestal.
/r/seduction16/01/19 08:13 AM
1

If you don't think what you are better than a person she date then why would you try to fuck her in the first place? Also I can't see anyone telling what he WANT to beat someone, it is just comparison. Stop making such a big deal out of it. I personally don't do any sort of shit like this. It is bad because you are trying to qualify yourself to a girl. I personally don't even care if she have boyfriend or not - I care only if she could meet my standards and expectation or not. If she can and wil…
/r/seduction16/01/19 08:00 AM
2

No, if it isn't true then it is lying, not showing off. Telling a girl what you are millionaire is showing off and bragging even if it is true.
/r/seduction15/01/19 12:26 PM
1

It depends what you consider as being timid. It could be interpreted as a guy not being too interested in them and then it would be attractive because girl could assume what she isn't good enough for you.
/r/seduction15/01/19 12:02 PM
0

If you are really big, muscular and MMA fighter then it isn't too stupid because it will make her unconsciously compare you to her bf. On the other hand it doesn't matter what you say, what is matter is why you say this, how and who you are actually. You don't need to say something intelligent or impress her with your conversation skills.
/r/seduction15/01/19 11:47 AM
1

Like everything in seduction - if you are not sure then field test this. Other guys field tested this and it worked for them, you could check for yourself if this will work for you or not.
/r/seduction15/01/19 11:42 AM
1

Humans have dual sexual strategy. Women need good genes, but they also need someone who will commit to them and take care about kids (it is a fact). This is why there would be contradictory results in most researches about female attraction in humans. Also here you are again, linking some subjective bs. Confidence don't have objective definition, especially among psychologists each of whom have his own opinion about everything. Psychology isn't considered as real science because it is too subjec…
/r/seduction14/01/19 05:55 PM
1

If it wasn't difficult then everyone would do it.
/r/seduction14/01/19 02:30 PM
5

Now it is the time for world to kill you because you achieved your life purpose. p.s. His name.
/r/seduction14/01/19 02:28 PM
5

Your real SMV matters if you play by rules. In pickup it is enough to not to be too ugly or disgusting. It is rather "don't be in lowest 20%" than "be in top 20%". You could get bunch of casual sex without being in top 2% or even top 20% in SMV.
/r/seduction14/01/19 02:28 PM
2

I can. You - can't. Because you don't want to.
/r/seduction13/01/19 04:34 PM
1

Having money and status is important for being chosen as provider of resources. Being confident, popular with women (or act like one) and good looking is important for being chosen as provider of healthy DNA.
/r/seduction13/01/19 04:33 PM
2

Lol. Everything I told you is related to evolutionary biology. Women judge your status based on your behaviour if they don't have enough reliable info about you. If you act like you have bunch of women they assume they have a bunch of women. If you act like you have a lot of money and status they assume what you have a lot of money and status. Though money isn't important when choosing short term partner, it is long term partner characteristic.
/r/seduction13/01/19 04:32 PM
0

You here talking about this as if those psychologist theories are absolute truth, but they are not - same thing as any other "different types of personality" shit. Sorry to disappoint you, but there are evolutionary biology which is real science which could answer WHY we were created in one way or another and how exactly our emotions works. Being non-needy works in any culture, being needy is unattractive in any culture. And how you reach non-neediness (at least in your behaviour, it is) isn't r…
/r/seduction13/01/19 05:16 AM
1

We humans are animals too. And you are talking as if unconscious physiological reactions of women "don't prove anything". Confidence is attractive BECAUSE this is secondary trait of having a lot of woman. Biologically you can't have IDGAF attitude to getting laid unless you already getting laid, so for woman you confidence and non-neediness with her is a "honest signal" of you already having other women. The problem is women have short term and long term reproductive strategy, which is why she w…
/r/seduction13/01/19 05:11 AM
1

Sexual attraction is biological process and work by rules created by evolution. Man with a lot of women IS attractive because he successfully complete his biological purpose. You will never start to understand attraction until you start to think in terms of evolutionary biology, everything else is humanitarian bullshit.
/r/seduction13/01/19 04:59 AM
1

Well yeah. We want to fuck hot woman because is woman isn't hot enough we wouldn't have boner on her - so how can we have sexual relations with her then? That isn't about being shallow, it is about physiology.
/r/seduction13/01/19 04:56 AM
20

It is better to be dominating, overbearing and less approachable with women because you are the one to take initiative anyway, you don't need to look approachable because most of them wouldn't take first step anyway. When you already talking it isn't bad if girl initially consider you as intimidating and then see what you are actually isn't scary. As a man your looks should prevent people from disrespecting behaviour - if you are "playing up" then women wouldn't talk shit to your face and would …
/r/seduction13/01/19 04:47 AM
1

If they don't take any action then they wouldn't have anyone. They take action within their social circle. It is obvious what to take action with new people is higher level.
/r/seduction13/01/19 04:37 AM
1

Pickup designed to work either in nightgame or daygame where you will meet a girl and then lead her to sex fast. If you do this persistently and become good at that then it is obvious what you will sleep with a lot of girls as long as you don't stop doing pickup. Goal or not, but this is type of results to define you being successful PUA or not.
/r/seduction12/01/19 03:53 AM
1

And magical tongue!
/r/seduction12/01/19 03:44 AM
1

If there are at least 10 girls who say that to you then there is something you should change, indeed. But most likely less than 5 girls told you this it means you just was unlucky.
/r/seduction12/01/19 03:43 AM
1

Girls you described usually go to clubs to be fucked by random alpha guy. Do you want to be this sort of boyfriend? Waiting at home while your gf fuck other guys? Girls chasing hottest guys and confident dudes don't exist in social circle, they exist in the clubs, bars, etc. Rules are different in social circle, this is why most guys could get in relationships as long as they aren't socially retarded and have broad social circle. Ah, also - if you are really good looking guy in a big city then t…
/r/seduction12/01/19 03:39 AM
1

Purpose of pickup and game isn't to find a girlfriend, so obviously what it wouldn't work well for guys who just need this. Almost all seminars and books could be easily found online for free, you don't need to buy any of this shit.
/r/seduction12/01/19 03:36 AM
1

Be jealous to guys who fucked 100+ women, including someone else girlfriends.
/r/seduction12/01/19 03:33 AM
1

Most people get in relationships because of pure luck - they are not socially retarded and have relatively broad social circle, so they could find someone of the same level to have relationships. It is achievable, effortlessly if you are lucky, but seduction exist to have casual sex with a lot of different women which is different purpose whatsoever.
/r/seduction12/01/19 03:31 AM
1

Because they TAKE action - taking action is a personality trait as well. Personality isn't about being interesting. It is about not being shitty. And most guys who are not interesting can get some girls from their social circle because they have some value in it, you are talking about it as if getting a girl or too is a proof what you are attractive. Guys who are interesting not only "end up with a girl" they either end up with amazing girl, or with A LOT of different girls - which isn't possibl…
/r/seduction12/01/19 03:29 AM
2

The problem is you people don't understand real abundance mentality good enough. Imagine what you will have bunch of girls who are amazing and want to be with you, ready to do anything you want to achieve it. You not only wouldn't care about one particular girl. It would change your behaviour completely. In some sense being in abundance mentality means what you become CHOOSER, not chaser. Thinking what you could find another girl isn't true abundance mentality. It is like thinking "well, I could…
/r/seduction11/01/19 04:28 AM
1

It depends on your values more than anything else. I used Buddhist as example for a reason. Not all people consider what your finances and social status are part of who you are. Problem with bums is what they look (and smell) terrible, bum in fine clothes and without stench wouldn't be perceived as one. Also no, people don't see from facade and "fictitious personality", maybe you did read the Game by Neil Strauss or know about Mystery from any other source - the point is the Mystery is creator o…
/r/seduction11/01/19 04:13 AM
1

The source of those problems inside the head - most people have fundamentally wrong worldview about women (and world) and wrong mindset when doing pickup. It doesn't really matter so much if your life is "put together" or not. You could get girls either way. When you do solo nightgame or daygame it doesn't matter at all what is your work, how many friends you have, etc. Actually it is more effective to pickup girls without giving them too much info about yourself. Also - workless and friendless …
/r/seduction10/01/19 12:58 PM
2

As there are LGBT - people with brain which function different from standard, there are also women with male type libido - those who physiologically have scattered type of attraction, they would want to fuck all more or less attractive men. Of course you shouldn't forget about social conditioning - for some people making out means nothing. I've read some guy who did a lot of nightgame have had make outs with 500 women while fucking only about 100 of them - it tells you a lot.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/19 12:41 PM
2

How many women find Bill Gates or Elon Musk sexy? Compared to Brad Pitt? For our primal brain resources not equal to status or power. If you are dominant, have muscles and other people obey your commands then emotionally you will be perceived as someone of high status and power. You don't understand - perception is subjective. For some random schoolgirl coolest guy from her school would be more attractive than some millionaire CEO. =\ You forget what woman have short term sexual strategy for get…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/19 06:14 PM
3

Some metaphors wouldn't help you to understand women. If you want to understand them then you should learn some evolutional biology and understand sexual strategies of homo-sapiens - then everything become easy.
/r/seduction08/01/19 08:29 AM
2

You don't understand what people evolved in what we are now tens thousands years ago - so being successful by modern definition doesn't mean what you are alpha. For the most part human females decide if you are alpha or not based on how you act around them (other factors secondary, specially if she lack any info about you other than looks) - main thing they want to determine is if you have a lot of options (pre-selection), how dominant you are and if you consider her of lower value than yours. P…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/19 08:18 AM
4

Sorry to disappoint, but being intelligent and rich aren't alpha traits, but provider traits. It is cool to be intelligent and rich, but for female instinctual emotion those traits aren't alpha.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/19 08:09 AM
12

This. Even on this sub some people miss this point. Even if we have perfect 10 girlfriend we still would want to bang less attractive girls - variety is important to us. Woman wouldn't even want other guys if she consider her current boyfriend as the best man available to her.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/19 07:58 AM
2

Human race wouldn't die, not from people stop wanting to have sex. First of all with modern science we don't even need actual sex to have kids. Moreover 90% of men never could either pump dump girls or go MGTOW. One man is enough to impregnate 100 women, so it is almost impossible for us to "die out" just because some guys stop fucking girls or some people become childfree or were born homosexual.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/19 07:46 AM
26

I think your problem is you have unrealistic perception of her - you overvalue her, ignore her flaws and think what she is special - she isn't. There is no "special" girls, no special people either. She is too important to you - and believe me what sooner or later she will find out and lose attraction to you because of it as well - then you will be hurt hard.
/r/seduction07/01/19 04:50 PM
4

I've found it for free somewhere, use google to find it. Also domination isn't only about you being dominant, it is more about her being submissive - following your commands, beg you to fuck her, etc.
/r/seduction06/01/19 06:09 PM
17

If you want to know more about foreplay then Sex God Method book is a must. Actually women enjoy emotional part of the sex more than physical. By the way it is true for men too - we could easily cum with almost any woman or without one - but real enjoyment from sex is when there are strong emotions involved. From what I read you trying to bring up only rather romantic and positive emotions - this is fine too, but the point is there should be different types of sex, different kinks and fetishes u…
/r/seduction06/01/19 05:16 PM
0

No one remove women from "pool of gamers", women are just not interested in main genres what suitable for esport - this is a FACT, and I already pinpointed it with evidence, so everything else you or anyone who tries to "argue" (actually this should be called demagogy) says here is nothing more than random nonsense. Also IDK why so many feminists here on MGTOW, it seems post was leaked to some random sub or something?
/r/MGTOW06/01/19 05:06 PM
1

So, maybe you will bring up something related to what I say instead of bringing up something random? There is zero contradiction between things you mentioned and what I said, please turn on your logic. Also why you bringing up RPGs or MMOs when only genres what are not dominated by males are family building and puzzles? Why you ignore the fact what in MOBA games which are the main genre for esport only 10% of players are women? Genre preference is very important statistic because it gives us und…
/r/MGTOW06/01/19 05:03 PM
-2

Read genre preference section. How amount of women owning consoles related to anything I said? There is zero connection. And also there is zero sexism in my post. If you think what gender differences have something to do with sexism then you are more than retarded. You saying what there are "skilled female gamers", from where? Women don't play games in which skill is required. You probably don't even know what is MOBA games I talk about, even though it is almost only genre of esport currently ex…
/r/MGTOW06/01/19 08:28 AM
0

This research what found out what 45% of gamers are females also tells you what in UK 64% of all population aged 4-64 years are "gamers". By gamers it means a person who play games at all. And yes, most of gender statistic was from free mobile games, so here you go. For better statistic about female populace in games you could check wiki page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_and_video_games In competitive games like MOBA (which is prevalent for esports) 90% of players are males. So no, this …
/r/MGTOW06/01/19 08:19 AM
1

Your second statistic states what almost half of LOL players are females. In article it is clearly stated what in MOBA games 90% of players are males. Genre preferences section allows you to clearly see gender differences in game preference and it allow you to make very accurate assumption about average time men and women spend on games as well. As everyone here say - women play in simple puzzle games to kill some time, it is hardly could be considered as serous gaming.
/r/MGTOW06/01/19 08:09 AM
-3

A lot of guys use female avatars in MMO (and I'm 90% sure this is how they got this statistic). I myself almost never used male avatars because they are ugly and it is just more enjoyable to control hot female elf. Anyone who played in WOW or any other MMO know what less than 15% players are females out there.
/r/MGTOW06/01/19 07:23 AM
1

First statistic could be true, but second one is complete nonsense and contradicts to first one. Why you give links to some random diagrams when there are wiki page for it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_and_video_games From it you could see the difference. Specially among game developers.
/r/MGTOW06/01/19 07:17 AM
1

For woman sex is of no value, what most of them want is someone cool who commit to them and it isn't so simple because guys who attractive wouldn't want to commit and guys who are willing to commit aren't attractive in most cases.
/r/seduction04/01/19 06:45 AM
1

You were told already hundred times here what no, it isn't necessary. There are guys without anything you mentioned what get results.
/r/seduction04/01/19 06:30 AM
1

All those rules follow same pattern and come from similar mindset. Just people can't understand it if you just tell them "be confident, don't be needy, be a leader, be a challenge" and here all this basic stuff is told in more practical and understandable way.
/r/seduction04/01/19 06:25 AM
1

You don't need to say something witty back. You need to change your approach to getting girls completely, it is wrong on fundamental level. Online it is a number game. If she likes you photos and profile then after short exchange try to meet her IRL. 95% girls would reject you no matter how witty your writing online. Your conversation tactics mean nothing online. You can't get all the girls, never. No one can. And if you are not exactly good looking and popular then forget about online entirely …
/r/seduction04/01/19 06:20 AM
10

Cool, but there are ten other guy who will try to get laid with this shy girl if she is cute, so for her your existence isn't important.
/r/seduction01/01/19 05:11 AM
5

The fact what you are looking for IOIs from girls is part of social conditioning too.
/r/seduction01/01/19 05:10 AM
2

Of course he wasn't socially awkward or else how could he do more than 100 approaches? Being socially awkward isn't something you can't change unlike your height, race or face. Ugly short indian guy in USA would probably struggle more than you. But he will get results if he take enough action. And you get nothing because you do nothing.
/r/seduction01/01/19 05:04 AM
1

Most guys have problem with getting sex mostly because of your A). When you understand what you could be happy without sex then you become someone who could get it effortlessly. There is no need to wish me luck, because I'm on this sub not to get any advices - I already have results vastly above average guy.
/r/seduction01/01/19 05:01 AM
1

It is boring in outsider perspective. I have some success with women but I still prefer to spent significant part of my time playing games and reading books. It is more interesting than go to some shitty party or club. Sometimes it is more interesting than spending time with hot girl. So my answer to you - I'm doing that and have some high quality women. Why? Because if you do cold approach daygame then your life style doesn't matter at all. In most cases girl wouldn't even know much about you b…
/r/seduction31/12/18 06:32 PM
1

You saying it as if it is something bad. And btw, most people don't choose their social circle at all, they just take what is available to them in 90% cases.
/r/seduction31/12/18 06:29 PM
1

Second part of Models is about changing yourself to something you are not though. The best thing you could take out of it is about being non-needy. As to how you become non-needy there are different ways, not only those mentioned in the book.
/r/seduction31/12/18 07:59 AM
1

Of course there weren't enough space for people to feel depressed when most of them worked more than 12 hours a day and tried to survive. Depression exist for modern people who has nothing else to do. So called depression is a "trend", yes - it is way to feel yourself special. Though IDK how it break anything about this post.
/r/seduction31/12/18 07:57 AM
1

More than 95% guys here never did 300 daygame approaches in their entire life, idk from where you get your statistic. You don't consider Tinder as cold approaches, are you? xD There was post recently about guy who get laid few times within 1-2 months by doing daygame cold approaches, it took him less than 100.
/r/seduction31/12/18 07:52 AM
1

This is theorising. On practice you become more lazy when you get some plates. Even more - most guys become super lazy even if they just get one average girl to fuck. This is why redpill and seduction community isn't nearly as popular as they should be. Guys who could get some average girl to be with them wouldn't be motivated enough to learn something new to be more attractive.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/18 07:24 AM
1

For some people watching netflix and playing Witcher would be more interesting way of spending their time than going to party and snowboarding. It could be boring from outsider perspective, but who cares? You should lead life YOU personally want, not life what is attractive to others.
/r/seduction31/12/18 07:22 AM
1

If you don't have social circle or there only men in it then there is no way you could get laid. If you never try to fuck any woman then it is almost impossible to get any, unless you are fine with fucking fat girls who approach you first. Of course in theory if you are top 5% in looks then some decent woman could take initiative to approach you, but she wouldn't fuck you herself and would expect you take action eventually. Most guys who end up late virgins just not social. Even ugly guys could …
/r/seduction31/12/18 07:15 AM
4

Then change it. It is not like only value woman could provide is her pussy. She could amuse you, entertain you, do things for you, help you meet other girls, etc. If you can't enjoy just communication for the sake of communication then things would be hard for you socially. Its like talking to guys only when you need something from them like money or status - it would be hard to get any friends like this.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/18 07:14 AM
1

This subreddit have entertainment value for people who already get results they want. Experienced guys here to give advices (because most of you don't read books anyway), to talk with like-minded people, to say what someone wrong when they are wrong. It is not like we people do everything to solve our problems. Reddit is something for entertainment more than education.
/r/seduction31/12/18 07:12 AM
2

Strange, considering what a week before start of the circle is "infertile week".
/r/TheRedPill31/12/18 05:18 AM
7

While women have different size of vagina, but tightness of pussy also very much depends on vaginal muscles and if a girl did any kegel exercises. If you have any long term plate then you should make her learn them asap, difference is BIG. Pussy have muscles too and they should be trained to be in a good shape. Just overall athletic girls more likely trained their pussy muscles while doing different types of exercises, but it isn't necessary always true.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/18 05:11 AM
3

Yes, women will sleep with you just for the sake of being good feminist and accuse you of rape, lol. If you don't want to be falsely accused of rape then: Make girl beg to fuck her before sex. Record things what happen either in video or audio. Don't be jerk to her until at least one week pass after you fucked her. But again unless you fucked 100 or more women it would be unlikely what any of them will have any problems at all after you two have sex.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/18 05:04 PM
1

If you get date from tinder or couple of plates then you will consider yourself as "above all this shit" and would find other excuses.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/18 05:02 PM
8

Approaching people in your class isn't cold approach. Why would you approaching her would be considering as trying to flirt? If you being friendly with ugly girl it is you flirting with her? Learn to approach people just for the sake of being friendly. Stop trying to fuck girls just from first words said - it makes you needy and even creepy.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/18 04:59 PM
17

In both cases you lost your frame, so shit happened. Explaining something to anyone is never good idea though.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/18 04:54 PM
2

In 90% cases he just don't meet enough girls and almost never attempted to fuck any. Most guys are late virgins because they don't have social circle with a lot of girls in it.
/r/seduction30/12/18 04:44 PM
1

Exactly. Anxious guys who can't even talk to girls normally go to Tinder and surprise - no one needs them. So they assume what it is impossible for them to get any girls at all. But the problem is even a guy who is naturally attractive and charismatic will suck online unless he is really good looking.
/r/seduction30/12/18 04:41 PM
-1

Building good social media presence is such a pain in the ass and it is just common sense in seduction community what it isn't worth it. The only good thing about online game is what you could pull some girls from Tinder if you are good looking. Want to build social presence which would be DHV? Good luck with that. Cold approach game is amazing because you could slay in it even if you are "not cool" in social way, don't have a lot of friend, don't go to parties, have hobbies what not considered …
/r/seduction30/12/18 04:38 PM
3

Then just follow small part of the book, what is the problem? The difference is in the book you could see whole system instead of unrelated and contradicting advices.
/r/seduction30/12/18 04:29 PM
11

Most important problem for 90% of noobs is what they don't take enough action to get reference experience. Over-theorising things isn't exactly helpful to make people take action.
/r/seduction30/12/18 09:11 AM
15

What do you mean contributing? There was nothing new at all in the last few years. It is either variations of something from Mark Manson's approach, or from standard pickup. If you read Models and know basic pickup stuff then there is nothing new you could learn on this sub.
/r/seduction30/12/18 09:08 AM
2

Moreover it isn't like kissing a girl is a part of seduction. You don't really need to kiss her until you two isolated and close to having sex. You can kiss her earlier, but it isn't necessary at all. Also if girl is interested enough you could tell her kiss you herself and she will.
/r/seduction30/12/18 09:05 AM
3

Stop chasing girls. Treat them like friends and be sexually not interested in them until they themselves start to chasing you. That is what naturally attractive guys do.
/r/seduction30/12/18 09:00 AM
3

IDK, in my UNI there a lot of girl much hotter. But maybe it is because I'm from Russia and have different standards and girls here overall hotter, lol.
/r/seduction30/12/18 08:58 AM
1

Average guy without any game could get laid on average 3 times after approaching 100 women.
/r/seduction30/12/18 08:51 AM
3

You don't need game to get laid. You need game to get laid more often statistically.
/r/seduction30/12/18 01:56 AM
1

So what? You have right to be judgemental. She isn't someone who superior to you in any sense.
/r/seduction30/12/18 01:54 AM
1

You can't have a crush on a girl if you don't consider her as someone special.
/r/seduction30/12/18 01:50 AM
2

Just the fact what someone have "crush" means what his worldview about women is shit and he should change it on fundamental level. The only way you could fall for a girl who yet to have sex with you is you putting women on pedestal from the start and idealising them.
/r/seduction29/12/18 03:06 PM
9

This shit could solved if you change your mind on fundamental level, not superficial one like most guys do. But to do fundamental worldview changes you would need sort of epiphany. So in most cases you could change yourself only by slowly taking right action.
/r/seduction28/12/18 06:26 AM
2

There is no secret for online dating. Either you are good looking and have great photos, or most women wouldn't be interested in spending their time on you online. Just test it - in job section list what you have very well paid job. Your results wouldn't change at all. If some women think you are beautiful man then you are above average. For average man there is no women who would think they are beautiful. You could just work on your looks, you don't need too much social skills or money if you h…
/r/seduction28/12/18 06:16 AM
1

No, you don't need to look at it from their point of view. It doesn't matter how many options you have if you stop caring about validation from being able to successfully chase women. Being non-needy isn't necessary about having options - it is about being someone who don't really need them in the first place. If you don't care about getting a girl to like you then it is attractive no matter if you are like this because you have a lot of options, or because you have things much more important th…
/r/seduction27/12/18 08:40 AM
0

You are not gay, you are bisexual. Straight men have zero interest in other guys cocks or sucking them.
/r/seduction27/12/18 08:22 AM
18

Instead of getting a "date" you should just hang out with her and have fun. It is fail to make it so official. Women should be interested in romance, guy shouldn't even think about romance or relationship before sex (after sex it depends if girl deserve it). Before sex you two just having fun and then it just "happens" what you two are alone in some isolated place and then you two have fun in more physical way. You put a lot of pressure on girls by treating things so serious. You ask her to hang…
/r/seduction26/12/18 06:09 PM
1

I personally never rejected because currently I never chase women. But not all women start to chase me and I'm fine with it. Still for guys who actually chase women (and it is more than 95%) - it doesn't matter so much if you have extremely high smv, it still would be a numbers game. In reality even if you are model-tier guy you still would be rejected A LOT if you start to do cold-approaches. For the fuck sake, even "red pilled game-denialist" like GLL agree what actively getting women is a num…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/18 05:52 PM
2

Most important thing is how you react to disqualification, not if someone could do it or not. And your reaction depends on what are your beliefs and worldview.
/r/seduction26/12/18 05:45 PM
0

It is strange what someone who wants to suck dicks consider himself as heterosexual. It is a person who lives in denial of his sexual orientation. Actually most bisexual male like this until certain point. Heterosexual males disgusted just by a thought of sucking another dude's dick.
/r/seduction26/12/18 05:45 PM
2

The problem is it doesn't matter if you stand out or not. The fact is more than 95% of women wouldn't meet you for whatever reason - this is result of online game and no matter what type of cool messages you use wouldn't help. In communication it doesn't really matter what you say, it is more important HOW you say it and online there is no this "how", there is no "honest signals" and real sub-communication, that leaves only your profile and photos to be deciding factor.
/r/seduction25/12/18 03:02 PM
-1

I assume what anyone not too stupid will at least google about side effects and read A LOT before using something what directly affects his hormonal system. If you use steroids without learning beforehand about any potential consequences then too bad for you.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/18 03:00 PM
3

Tell me if I get it wrong, but are you trying "to game" girls online or something? Real game is done in real world, it doesn't really work so much online.
/r/seduction25/12/18 12:09 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/gayporn/comments/a97nfd/perfection/echby7z/ One of the most strange comments I seen on reddit recently.
/r/seduction25/12/18 12:04 PM
2

Even if you are 6 foot 5 jacked dude you still could fail 100% of interactions you have by acting like retard, autistic or close to it (which a lot of guys do). Or if you just spend all your time at home playing games and watching porn. SMV matter, but your behaviour patterns (i.e. "game") matter as well. Having a game always increase your statistical results. Having high smv always increase your statistical results. As to what extent those factors matter - it depends. Fact is you could get abov…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/18 11:57 AM
2

Sorry to disappoint you, but getting girls is a number game. Your Mystery and Style couldn't get all the girls, never. They would be rejected by most women. Being good with women is about statistical results only. If you could get one out of ten hot girls in your bed from a daygame then you are at advanced level.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/18 11:53 AM
11

A lot of PUA guys do ten times more approaches than it, there is nothing risky, unless you post it on youtube then it could have legal problems, in theory.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/18 11:49 AM
-3

Artificial test is very bad for your health (proven fact), unless you are over 45-50 years old, so it is a big no-no for young guys.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/18 11:45 AM
11

It is fine to "cold approach" if you are not coming from frame of "getting girls" but just being friendly. Don't chase girls, friendzone them all and choose among those who start to chase you (they will IOS you like crazy). As Auxfite said - make friends with everyone.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/18 11:40 AM
48

Or maybe women go abroad mainly to slut out. Why else would she go to "have fun" in a different city?
/r/TheRedPill25/12/18 11:35 AM
2

Currently average man could win thousands battles and earn millions of gold - in games. Social media is a game too, just it exist to entertain women. Also you are not average. Average guy of your age already fucked at least 3-5 women and was in a marriage or two. Average guys do fine. To improve your behaviour patterns you should change your mind, like, completely from inside out. Those "great risks" are only in your head. You most likely would never meet again this random woman you approached o…
/r/seduction25/12/18 11:23 AM
1

Attraction is about perceived sexual value, that is all. Confidence is desirable trait because it is natural to be confident with people of equal or lower value and we all become anxious when talking to people we perceive as higher in social hierarchy. This is why directly telling a girl what you are nervous it is the same as directly telling her what you treat her as someone higher in sexual hierarchy. If you perceive yourself as someone of similar or lower level of attractiveness then you woul…
/r/seduction25/12/18 11:04 AM
4

Easiest way to become better with women - stop treating them as sexual objects and someone to chase. I call it "semi-asexual", it means what you are not interested in pursuing women, but you will fuck them if they chase you themselves. By default treat women as friends and potential pursuers. If girl start pursuing you then give her some shit-tests so what it weren't too easy for her to get you. Stop caring about getting girls, just be friends with them and enjoy your life. You would be shocked …
/r/seduction24/12/18 12:00 PM
1

Sorry, but unlike you a lot of us tested it. In daygame approach there is no big difference. Also same thing was tested scientifically, sorry. https://web.archive.org/web/20110423155150/http://www.practicalpickup.com:80/science-of-the-direct-approach For lazy people: "Rating of the confederate’s physical attractiveness was found to have no effect on the results and therefore there is no reason to discuss this variable further." This "looks is everything" approach easily crushed by reality when h…
/r/seduction24/12/18 11:46 AM
2

This works good to make approach more socially acceptable, but it don't make you more attractive, on contrary. It tells a girl what you consider her as someone of higher value than you are, as if she is some sort of celebrity and very important to you even if she did nothing to deserve it. In most cases it also tells her what you will treat all hot women same way, do you think it is attractive? Sure, she will react good, same way you do if some nice but unattractive girl approach you and tells y…
/r/seduction24/12/18 11:39 AM
2

Bro, things are harder for you because you do nothing at all, don't talk to new women and can't take rejection, like, at all. In modern society any average man could have 100+ sex partners in his life if he really wants to. It was impossible before, even Casanova (who become world-famous) slept with less women than average PUA. Sexual life was similar to that of current Muslim countries - you get your wife through relatives and that is it. Maybe this way was easier for guys with zero social skil…
/r/seduction24/12/18 11:30 AM
2

Much harder? Men almost never could get casual sex easier than now. For the most part of our human history we were able to get sex only by means of marriage or rape (winning wars). Companies exist only to make profit. And to make profit they developed to create things what demanded by people. People get what they want, companies get money - it is simple like this. People pay with their money and time because it is what they want. And choose. Most guys want to play games and masturbate more than …
/r/seduction22/12/18 12:50 PM
50

"A dude is staring at you on the street. You stare back. After a 4 second staring contest, one of the participants looks away -- he broke frame. His intention was to keep staring in order to prove his worth as a man. He failed to stick to his action and intention, while the other succeeded in the same endeavour, the latter being the external influence that broke the loser's frame. " It isn't really about a frame. In human males and in some other primates prolonged eye contact without communicati…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/18 01:17 PM
5

Main concept of models is to stop being needy and become non-needy. IDK, but for me it seems this post mostly unrelated to this idea. Instead of "just talking to everyone", which is hard for most people and could be considered as overdoing it, Mark advocates Systematic Desensitization with slow progression. Talking to everyone whenever you can isn't exactly healthy and more much so doing it for the sake of become better with girls, for some people attempt to do this could make things only worse.…
/r/seduction20/12/18 02:14 PM
4

Ask yourself - why YOU need a girl who isn't interested in you? Why you need a girl if she can't provide any value to you? So called rejection it is just girl proving to you what you don't really need her, what she don't want (for whatever reason, doesn't really matter) to give you value you expect from her. It is easy to take "rejection" and move on when you understand it like this. You will see what your anxiety and fear disappear rapidly.
/r/seduction20/12/18 03:58 AM
32

But in this situation his friend was very good to him. Some other guy could just fuck her without caring about his friend's feelings.
/r/seduction20/12/18 03:50 AM
2

Checked it out. Basically it is a bunch of bitches who whine about their sad life and how depressed they are. It isn't place where people try to overcome depression, it is a place where nihilists tell each other how miserable they are. This sub exist to make people more depressed and help them feel masochistic enjoyment from suffering.
/r/MGTOW19/12/18 03:17 PM
2

Nowadays kids and women don't die without support of a man. Women and her kid have basically same survival rate either she have provider man or not. Everything else is result of that. Eventually people in modern society just end up fuck each other for the sake of sexual enjoyment, traditional moral go fuck itself, we as men wouldn't have responsibility any more to care about kids (maybe alimony would be cancelled too). There is zero probability of "humanity extinction" it is same as telling what…
/r/MGTOW19/12/18 12:55 PM
1

You have some so called pride, but you don't have real self-respect. A person who truly respects yourself and truly pride of yourself wouldn't care about rejection so much.
/r/seduction16/12/18 05:33 PM
1

Its all depends on your worldview and mindset. If rejection hurts you hard then it means what you still have a lot of neediness and validation seeking in you. If you are non-needy then "rejection" is actually a girl doing something what you don't like, something wrong and something what makes her less attractive to you. Why would I need a girl who can't appreciate me, why would I need a girl who is unwilling to give me any value? You should consider so called rejection as a girl failing to meet …
/r/seduction16/12/18 05:28 PM
1

I already did it. Though my dick always was bigger than average. I raised it from 18cm to 19cm in length (0.4 of inch) within less than half a year of doing some basic jelking from time to time (3-4 time a week for 2-3 minutes). All exercises and results you could expect from it could be easily googled (goodlookingloser for example have a lot info about it). Most guys just don't give a fuck about their dicks. You could add up to 2 inches within 2 years if you do exercises regularly. It means wha…
/r/MGTOW16/12/18 12:48 PM
-3

Most guys don't even try. Even though it is even easier to do than to build muscles.
/r/MGTOW15/12/18 02:28 PM
1

This should be something what could change depending on her behaviour. This means having boundaries and standards. If people don't meet your standards or don't respect your boundaries you should change how you treat them. If a girl do what you expect from her then you like her even more, if she do something you don't want her to do then you change your treatment accordingly. Your problem is what you already determined what you like her and nothing could change it, or at least this is very hard t…
/r/seduction14/12/18 06:15 PM
31

On the dance floor just staring and being physical is enough to get somewhere.
/r/seduction13/12/18 06:01 PM
3

You wouldn't go to a court for touching a girl at your own place while you two are alone with no witnesses. Unless she start to resist physically and you prevent her from leaving. Fake rape reports sure exist, but for that you need at least to fuck her. No one would go and tell to police what you sexually harassed them based on that he described, even in most retarded society with influence of #metoo it just wouldn't happen. If you are too afraid then tell her directly what she could leave home …
/r/seduction13/12/18 05:52 PM
0

Humans are bio-machines controlled by brain and neuroscience knows more about us than average person could imagine - there is no room for discussion here. What you call "emotions" in reality is just neuroactive substances (neurotransmitters) stimulating neuroreceptors.
/r/seduction13/12/18 05:28 PM
–

You missed the point completely. Woman should obey not because she can't think for herself - but because this creates hierarchy. For people it is much simpler to exist in hierarchy (this is why most people never could be self-employed, it is just simpler when you have someone tell you what to do be it your teacher, parents, boss or... husband) and any systems are more effective in this way. But what is important in our discussion is which variation is best for you as a man. And of course it woul…
/r/seduction11/12/18 06:00 PM
1

Everything is in your head. If you think it is strange - then it is strange. If you think it is normal - then it is normal. This is a matter of opinion - if in your opinion what you are doing is normal, then it doesn't matter what other people think. Also you are only one who really knows if you are just go in the field to chase girls or to do something else. Guess what? Anyone else don't really give a fuck about it. If people straightly tell you something offensive (what almost never happen in …
/r/seduction11/12/18 07:54 AM
–

This isn't about looking down on someone. It is about who is decision maker in the family and about inner hierarchy. Do parents look down on their kids? No. But kids should obey their parents. Same way a woman should obey to her man if they want to make family what lasts. This is one of the reasons why in more traditional societies divorce rates are very low compared to divorce rates in developed countries. Here we have equality and there is no inner hierarchy. This is also reason why parents of…
/r/seduction11/12/18 06:59 AM
–

Among successful guys in their forties what I know all of them have wives or long time partners much younger than them. Women are easily accept reality of a man if they consider him important. Why would you should give a shit about her interests or whatever she think? What is important is her doing what you need her to do in relationships. If you want to have "partner equal to you" then maybe you need someone who is similar to you. But if you want relationships where you could just relax then yo…
/r/seduction10/12/18 06:22 PM
1

I don't tell you what average man have 50 women in a lifetime. I tell what it is normal for a man to plan having sex with at least 50 women in his life and this is achievable for any average dude who want it and know how (if you are on this sub then you have access to all the knowledge you need). 50 women in a lifetime isn't exactly a lot, btw. Some guys I know have this number of new lays within 1-2 years. Get laid with 50 new women within 10-20 years isn't exactly hard. I myself have 15-20 new…
/r/seduction10/12/18 06:13 PM
3

I think your BIG MISTAKE was what you went on a date for the first time in a year instead of doing it regularly. If there is a movie you wanted to watch then it is fine to do it with a girl or a friend. The problem is what you just went home alone immediately after you watched the movie. If movie was good then it is shared experience for both of you, it means you start to trust each other more. After the movie you could share experience and go home.. To your home, both of you. And then at your p…
/r/seduction10/12/18 02:41 AM
-4

Making a girl cum isn't science, as long as you have access to the internet then it is easy to learn how exactly you do this. Either learn how to finger a girl properly, or buy Hitachi and then you don't even need a dick to give her unique sexual experience.
/r/seduction10/12/18 02:37 AM
3

You just don't have any standards, it is equal of a woman being a slut. Slut is a woman without standards and you are similar in this matter. You frame it positively, but it isn't. If you are excited about a woman without her doing anything at all then it means what you don't have standards. It is no different than a girl who is ready to fuck almost anyone more or less handsome. If you are fine with being like this then it is your choice. But don't put it as if you are here being nice or whateve…
/r/seduction10/12/18 02:32 AM
12

You feel good about all this stuff because you are needy and place women above you. They have high value to you this is why your attempts to trying to please your "superiors" feels so good to you. Would you all those needy things with ugly girl or some homeless guy? You shouldn't pretend, you should change your core worldview to see reality. Your problem (and main problem for most guys) is what you like a girl from the start, even though she did nothing to deserve it. For me the fact what she is…
/r/seduction09/12/18 04:44 PM
6

Oh, lol. Not that widespread? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape Check Rumney data. If we see more recent data then 10% is minimum and most data tells us what percent of false rape accusations is at least 25-40%. And this is only those accusations which were accepted as false. It is very widespread because there is no repercussions for false rape claims and there are such things as #metoo and "rape culture". The main problem is what it is hard to prove rape accusation as fals…
/r/seduction09/12/18 04:35 PM
1

All instructors from RSD lift, other than Luke. And from their paid materials (all of which I got for free btw), surprise-surprise, Luke have the best course, also his profile (in terms of how hot girls you could see with him) and reviews are the best too. So no, I can't realize this "most important thing" based on what you mentioned. Your looks matter very much when you try to fuck club sluts or get girls online, otherwise - not really. I've never met a guy who would have above average social s…
/r/seduction09/12/18 04:18 PM
1

Being a man who respect himself has nothing to do with "nature" and "high testosterone", maybe only to small extent. I know a guy who lift from his early teens, have big muscles and definitely have high testosterone, but he still suck with women and very insecure. All shit tests are about how you treat yourself, how much you respect yourself and if you accept her opinion about yourself or not. If you have high level of self-respect then you never could fail a shit test. You will treat all her sh…
/r/seduction09/12/18 11:02 AM
0

How exactly this advice "Instead of learning "right answers" learn to how be a man who never could answer wrong." is related to taking something personally and playing defensive, mm? So you assume it is better to be loser who learned some canned phrases for situations instead of being a true alpha who have strong frame and so never need any canned phrases because everything comes naturally to him? It seems seddit have no future if most guys here rather would be some trickster than real man.
/r/seduction09/12/18 05:01 AM
-18

No, this is shitty idea. Girls use shit tests to know if you are real deal or not, if you real alpha and have strong frame, or not. If YOU ARE, then answer will come naturally. If you need to learn your answers from compilations then you are fake and in most cases you will do something what gives you away. Instead of learning "right answers" learn to how be a man who never could answer wrong.
/r/seduction08/12/18 05:21 PM
1

Making her emotionally tangled up for years is A LOT of work - why would you waste time and efforts on subpar LTR when you could get decent girl and still fucking as many sluts as you want?
/r/TheRedPill08/12/18 03:46 PM
3

Much changed - you wouldn't die from 99% of STD you could get nowadays and it means A LOT. Also you could avoid STD with 99% if you use condoms in a right way. STDs are common because a lot of people just don't like to use condoms (or do it wrong), that is all.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/18 03:43 PM
1

This is ridiculous what sub about getting laid with hot girls become something where a lot of guys assume what natural desire to fuck young hot girls just for the sake of sex is creepy and make you cringe. There are women just for sex and there are women for serious relationships. And in both situations younger women are preferable for obvious reasons I already explained. Guys go for older women just because they can't get younger ones and then they just create excuses - like you do. In reality …
/r/seduction08/12/18 10:33 AM
-4

I'm talking from experience of older guys (like 35-45 years old) I know who are successful with women. As about girl's complains and whatever it just means what you are unable to set boundaries with women (and most likely people as well), can't control frame of interaction. Also it seems you never heard about plating girls and for you there is either one night stand or serious relationships. Which again tells me about how inexperienced you are, I assume you was with less than 10 women so you can…
/r/seduction07/12/18 05:34 PM
–

And 30+ years old women are good partners? Lol. If a woman can't get in meaningful long term relationships before she 30 then it is almost certain what she just unable to do so at all. In other words most women who are single after 30 are just unsuitable for something long term. "I have had some young girls and they were inexperienced and insecure". Tell me more after you get at least 20 young girls so what your statistic could be representative of something. Most likely you are just unable to a…
/r/seduction07/12/18 05:29 PM
6

Sluts is short version of "unsuitable for any long term relationships with someone other than beta cuck". And if we talk about social value then man having a lot of sex partners become higher in value, woman who having a lot of sex partners become lower in value. So no, they are not doing same thing.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/18 03:54 PM
–

What do you mean about "getting women their own age" and "people who are not mature"? The objective of pickup is to get young 18-25 years old girls, no matter how old you are. Who would want to get woman of same age when he is himself in his forties?
/r/seduction07/12/18 03:44 PM
-4

What, 5%? This statistic is crazily low, even if guy ugly and his approach would be "hello, can we exchange numbers, please?" even then his statistic should be a little higher. 5% is very good statistic if we talk about % of girls you have had sex after approaching them. While getting number isn't hard, but most numbers don't lead to anywhere.
/r/seduction07/12/18 03:41 PM
1

You are on seddit and still haven't learn what you should fuck a girl within, at most, three meetings? You don't need all this "we need to know each other" bullshit, to get laid you need to make a girl feel emotions and lead her to your or her place with any excuse before she calms down and make rational judgement about you. After the sex dynamics changes and things become easy unless you are needy as fuck. Your post called "seduction makes me depressed", but for me it seems you never did any se…
/r/seduction06/12/18 07:49 AM
1

What type of score it was, lol?
/r/seduction05/12/18 07:40 PM
11

Being a provider is a trait selected by evolution too. There couldn't be too much males who only fuck women without taking care about children, because in so called brutal environment a woman with a child destined to die without provider of resources and defence. If we talk about humans then compared to other primates we look like kids, just compare our physical traits (google neoteny) to gorillas among which females always choose alpha male. Instead humans just have two reproductive strategy - …
/r/TheRedPill05/12/18 07:18 PM
2

Who said about blindly taking everything from one guy or completely ignoring everything he say if you disagree with some of his claims? He never said what other ways to get girls don't work and don't exist, this is just better way to live - having interesting life without caring about girls who will find you themselves. But also what he say (which is true)- defeating your anxiety is possible and it is one of the most important things anyone should do to get results. Difference between you and or…
/r/seduction05/12/18 01:10 PM
2

Girls need time to make rational judgement if a guy is a good choice for her, but she don't need time to start feeling emotional attraction to you, actually time is against you in this case. Of course a lot of girls will want to be with you rationally as well, but it is just much less effective and overall you will get girls of lesser quality. Great emotional high doesn't mean any sort of shit connection thing, it means being challenging - teasing her, doing push-pull, qualify/disqualify her, an…
/r/seduction05/12/18 11:54 AM
4

Not fucking a girl on the first date is called slow. She don't need to know you well to decide if she want to have sex or not. Same way I'm almost sure what you already decided what you want to fuck her. If you giving her great emotional experience then she would be at her peak within 20-40 minutes of meeting, this is the time when you need to escalate things - kiss is the least thing you could do, better lead her to your or her place and escalate things as far as you can. If you couldn't do it …
/r/seduction04/12/18 04:21 PM
5

I have amazing idea for you. How about instead of having good conversation in the train you will have good conversation with her at your or her place and then fuck her? There is a girl you like and then you see what other guy like her too - instead of saying to yourself "it is me who will fuck her in the end, you loser" you just give up so what he could have better chances with her? Also start to view yourself from position of passionate lover (with whom women rather have affair) and not some je…
/r/seduction04/12/18 04:09 PM
1

I already said more than enough for you to be able to change yourself if you really want. If you want more info then google "The most important part of game is not being emotionally invested". You are overvalue all those things related to women and you overvalue it way too much. Just think about why it is so important to you. Does all of this would be "great experience"? Real world girls (compared to girls from, for example, visual novels, or from wet fantasies of young boys) are nothing special…
/r/seduction04/12/18 03:47 PM
2

The question about being fat - is you could sleep with a lot of beautiful women while being fat guy? The answer is YES. Would you require higher level of personality and pickup skills than good looking guy to achieve same results? Answer is yes again, but so what? Also a bunch of researches prove what women don't care about looks as much as men do, specially if we talk about potential of long term relationships then looks doesn't matter like at all. And unlike most guys think it is easier to get…
/r/seduction04/12/18 03:44 PM
2

What he telling is what in reality even if you do everything RIGHT, in the BEST way possible, then you still wouldn't get laid with all girls, you still wouldn't be able to fuck even 1/3 of those you approach, having statistic of 1 lay per 10 approaches in daygame is something to be proud about, this is a level of top pua in the world. Things what "work" are things what make your statistic higher, not things what allow you to always get laid or "the only thing what work". Even if you fuck up eve…
/r/seduction03/12/18 08:14 AM
7

If because of this "addiction" you stop approaching women at all then it could hurt your chances because if there is no interaction then nothing could happen.
/r/seduction03/12/18 07:48 AM
2

I can't see how you being autistic make you unable to earn money. I'm myself earn with online marketing, you don't need to talk with people if you work online and there are people who earn more than 5000$ per month online, there are people who make millions like this. I personally not so successful, but I earn more than enough for someone who lives in Russia - and to do that I don't need to talk with anyone in real life. Other than online marketing there a lot of other professions which could al…
/r/seduction03/12/18 07:39 AM
2

Assuming what a girl is horrible and idiot doesn't mean what you never change her opinion about her. You not only shouldn't put people on pedestal, you shouldn't put them on your own level until they proved what they are on it. It means by default you should treat people as potentially inferior. It means you assume what she COULD be inferior to you, be much worse than you - which is why you should learn more about her. And most guys just assume by default what girl either equal to them or better…
/r/seduction02/12/18 06:49 PM
1

Now I'm pretty sure about reasons why you don't have any success with women. You don't talk to them and don't lead things to sex. It is impossible for any sex to happen with those circumstances. If you never try to lead girl to your or her place where you two would be alone - nothing could happen. If you never try to touch her - nothing could happen. It has nothing to do with timing, or you being slow. To seduce a woman it is enough to talk 10% of the time while she talks 90% of time, actually i…
/r/seduction02/12/18 05:23 PM
1

Witcher 3 is better experience than most women could give to a man, so if you still haven't played this game then it should have higher priority than to get women, lol. Of course it depends on your financial situation - if you don't have enough money to live and instead you are being close to become homeless then it should be most important thing to change - if you are in first world country then there a lot of opportunities for you to become better financially. If you have a job which is enough…
/r/seduction02/12/18 04:41 PM
1

For me it seems you have more important things to change in your life than getting women. Maybe in your particular case it would be better to solve your other problems first. Not because you need it to get women, but because those problems are much more important than women. Even if you get a woman, even if she is somehow hot, it wouldn't solve all your other problems - what is the point then? It wouldn't make you happy, you see. And sex by itself would be most likely something what disappoint y…
/r/seduction02/12/18 04:31 PM
6

Main difference is what 90% of sexual attraction is based on your looks if we talk about seducing a guy. Depending on your looks for him it would be "I would never fuck her", or "I would fuck her if no one else learn about it", or "I would fuck her and there is no shame if other people know it", or "I would fuck her and it is something to be proud about", or "she is out of my league, there is no way I could fuck her". Good news - unless you are in first category then there are chances you could …
/r/seduction01/12/18 04:30 PM
2

If you are just always alone in a club it is low value. But if you was alone when you got into the club, but after few hours you are around bunch of people who loves you and grab attention of anyone in the club (for example by having great fun and doing crazy stuff), then it is much much higher value than being a shy pussy who need his friends to feel a little more confident. If you want to know about how to be true high value guy in the club then you definitely need to check Social Circle Bluep…
/r/seduction01/12/18 04:21 PM
2

By "not interested" I mean what you don't need them in your life. I explained it already - it doesn't mean what you are not interested in sex or girls. It means what you don't need any woman until he proved what she could give you some value. Why would you be interested in a woman before you know for sure if she could give you good sex, respect, validation (if you need it), etc? You are not "interested in her" if we talk about general meaning of it, but you are interested in knowing what qualiti…
/r/seduction01/12/18 04:14 PM
1

Ask yourself what YOU want, not what women want. Their desires should be important to them, not to you. First step to be better with women is to come from worldview which wouldn't make you feel miserable if a woman can't give you what you want. And also it seems you are seeking serious relationships (or else why would you care about cheaters) - this is a wrong road for someone who never have had casual sex with women. If you think what it is easier to get sex by having relationships - it is not.…
/r/seduction01/12/18 04:07 PM
2

Did you ever heard about monks? Some of them spend all their life without having sex and they are not needy at all, lol. When I approach a girl I have a question "do I need her or not?". Of course I don't need a girl if I can't have sex with her (unless she could compensate it in one way or another). Do you need a girl if you can't have sex with her and she don't compensating you in another way? I assume the answer is no. You are just coming from wrong standpoint. Come from standpoint of what YO…
/r/seduction01/12/18 03:59 PM
2

Having standards isn't exactly "being confident with himself", it means what by default you are not interested in women, like in any of them, they should do something to change it (actually you will make them do it, because they are lazy and shy). Even if super hot 10/10 randomly approach me and ask me to fuck her I'll reject this proposal. Its all about who is chasing and who is chased - if you want to be one who is chased by girls then you need to reverse roles and you could do it only by havi…
/r/seduction30/11/18 05:43 PM
1

Unless you are older than 50 then there is no real reason why you should to for women past their 30. And of course they want sexual experience, or else there wouldn't be so much women in their thirties who cheat on their financially successful husband with some young muscular dude who have nothing.
/r/seduction30/11/18 05:23 PM
1

Women don't want sex just by itself. Moreover most guys as well don't need sex just by itself - they need it to get validation. Being needy isn't wanting the sex as enjoyable process, it is being in need of validation which you got from getting a sex. Overall your understanding is right. And moreover why would you tell her about your job? If she don't know what type of job you have then she wouldn't include it in her perception of you. Most girls rather talk about themselves than about you anywa…
/r/seduction30/11/18 05:22 PM
1

Unlike you I fucked enough women to be objectively considered as someone who knows what he talk about. Most guys never could really succeed with women because they have fundamentally wrong approach to it which makes things very complicated. If you don't want to learn from experienced guys, moreover for free, then it is your choice - choice to do things in a hard way which leads to disappointment.
/r/seduction28/11/18 03:44 PM
2

There is no contradictions. Woman don't need to know about your work, your friends, if you are serious about her, etc, before actually sleeping with you. I never mentioned anywhere what you should tell her what you could potentially have relationships with her. If you say what you want only sex it would make her "anti-slut" mechanism active, this is why it is a bad idea. It has nothing to do with you or her thinking about relationships. And what I'm saying always is what you should have standard…
/r/seduction28/11/18 07:14 AM
1

People care about status symbols anywhere in the world, it isn't point. There a lot of different reasons why woman could sleep with a man and be attracted to him. And having high status isn't most important thing. Because our brains didn't changed much from tens of thousands years ago, women don't decide man's status based on his job and money alone, actually it doesn't matter at all for younger girls. It is important when she tries to choose husband, which she do based on logic more than anythi…
/r/seduction28/11/18 07:02 AM
1

If a girl have "low subjective value" then it is fine for her to become slut and just fuck anyone? It isn't about being the prize, women don't need sex by itself even if they enjoy it - what they need is validation, but you could get it only from a person who have standards. Me approving her isn't something what I need, it is something what she wants herself, you see. And also there is no "objective low value", social value exist only inside heads of people. If you are sexless, don't have good j…
/r/seduction28/11/18 06:55 AM
2

Being gentlemen is different from being honest and direct about your desires, you see. And of course they love it, even if a creep approaching them they would like it enough to tell others about it (because women love to be desired), women want to be desired, but they want guys who they should win, they don't fuck guys who are interested in them from the start and don't qualify or disqualify her at all, you see. Women love it when guys compliment them, but it isn't something what leads you to ha…
/r/seduction28/11/18 06:50 AM
1

I approach a girl to know if she could be interesting, if she could impress me in one way or another. Why I would want her number or spend time with her if she did nothing to deserve it and I don't know how would she act and what benefits I could get from spending my time on her?
/r/seduction28/11/18 06:46 AM
4

It is not like getting yourself a woman takes so much time it would prevent you from establishing yourself. Those things don't contradict to each other if you don't take things to extreme or have very low success rate. Even for bellow average guy he wouldn't get 1 woman out of 1000, it would be rather 1-3 out of 100 and approaching 100 women within month isn't time consuming at all. It is not your hobbies what give you more confidence with women. It is the fact what those hobbies are more import…
/r/seduction27/11/18 06:57 PM
8

You are average (or below average) looking billionaire with very high level of social status. You approach random woman on the street. How could she know who you are? Do you think he would be successful by starting bragging about his identity? Or maybe by top tier guys you understand very hot looking guy? Then you assume what model looking guy could approach and fuck any random woman? If you don't like idea of abundance, then how about idea of having standards? Some self-respect? Or to have self…
/r/seduction27/11/18 06:13 PM
2

To decide what is normal and what is not it isn't necessary to have experience of it. Same way you know what is abnormal even if you never did most of those things.
/r/seduction27/11/18 06:06 PM
16

I assume you replied to wrong comment and no one understand what are you talking about, which is why you was downvoted.
/r/seduction27/11/18 06:04 PM
5

You either base you confidence on reactions of women or not. If you don't base your confidence on their reactions then it doesn't really matter how good you are in other areas of life. And if you relate your success and confidence with their reactions then even if you have success in other areas of life you will suffer from rejections. Rejection isn't about you - this is a fact guys should learn before anything else. Even if you are ugly it doesn't mean what you are rejected because you are ugly…
/r/seduction27/11/18 06:00 PM
3

Who saying about "every single time". I clearly stated in my post what to know what works and what not you should try a lot of times to have statistic. This is why outer game was developed so slowly. If you alter your behaviour based on her reactions (instead of based on objective statistic you gathered through experience) then you don't have any chance to learn anything. You shouldn't alter things based on her reactions, you should alter it based on results you get (which isn't same). Some thin…
/r/seduction27/11/18 05:53 PM
1

English is my third language and I haven't proofread this message. When woman learn about your dick size you already got her, you see. If you two reached the point at which she could see your penis then you are already was attractive to her enough.
/r/seduction27/11/18 05:49 PM
-1

Height and face matter because if woman is too short or too high for me then I wouldn't date her. In same way it is important what she don't have a dick and it would be terrible if she have a big dick. You don't make much sense, why would you talk about things what matter only for women when we talk about thing what related only to men? I assume guy asked us about how to get woman (and then your height and face doesn't matter at all), not a man. To get a man he already have cute face, his dick d…
/r/seduction27/11/18 05:43 PM
1

You should read Sex God Method to know what women truly enjoy in sex. You need to learn fingering a girl (which isn't hard) to know what you could make her orgasm even without your dick. Do you want to make any girl cum within few minutes? Just buy Hitachi Magic Wand and you will become sex god for any woman who don't own this toy, lol. Still having bigger dick could make sex more enjoyable. For you. So google "goodlookingloser", there are ways to make your dick bigger and more sensitive.
/r/seduction27/11/18 05:41 PM
3

He couldn't get even one girl he wants. He could "buy" many girls, or get many "gold diggers", this is for sure. But it is not "getting girls" in actual sense, you see. Still you are right what having skills and hobbies is more important. But my point was what confidence in different areas of life isn't directly related. If you are confident with women it doesn't mean what you'll be confident in the business or in the sport. It is mystery for me why guys think what it works in reverse way. What …
/r/seduction27/11/18 05:33 PM
2

It seems you don't have much experience, particularly with cold approach pickup. No matter what you do you would be rejected by most girls. Either directly, or by them not meeting you after they gave you their #, etc. There is no point in time where you would get all girls you approach - it is not possible and it is unrelated to you doing things right or wrong. If guy could get laid with 10-15 girls out of 100 he approached then he is someone of god level in pickup. BTW I'm myself never get reje…
/r/seduction27/11/18 05:25 PM
2

And when she returned back home some other guy fucked her brains out. Maybe she even mentioned to him how cute you was.
/r/seduction27/11/18 05:19 PM
1

If you see where the problem lays it shouldn't be hard to solve it. Find different reason to talk with her other than getting laid - it is as simple as this, but you need to think about it.
/r/seduction27/11/18 05:18 PM
2

Why you care about "leaving a trail of broken hearts"? Women don't care about "leaving a trail of cum filled lonely hands" if you know what I'm talking about. If you are upfront honest with women from the beginning about wanting to fuck them then for them you are needy creep, try to approach random woman and say to her what you want to make her orgasm, it will add new upvoted post on #metoo for sure. Even if women want to have sex they don't want to lose their false "dignity" and lower themselve…
/r/seduction27/11/18 05:09 PM
2

Yes, just golden advice - be successful in other areas of life and you will do fine with women. You wouldn't. Guys who believe in this are ones who never met guy successful in life, but loser with women. At least everyone knows who is Elon Musk, just google about his personal life. He didn't get confidence he need with women even after all his achievements. You build your confidence with women either by having experience with them, or by having right worldview (mindset) about them. Even if you b…
/r/seduction27/11/18 04:47 PM
3

Your advice have one serious flaw - "slaying it at the gym", having new haircut, clean style, etc, wouldn't save you from rejection in any way. You approach with simple simple simple and get rejected by some average girl. And here is all your "confidence" shaken, unless you have right mindset. And if you already have right mindset then you don't need to achieve anything to be confident with women, you see. Because confidence goes from mindset and experience. If you have confidence in riding a bi…
/r/seduction27/11/18 04:44 PM
5

Wrong. Even if you do everything in best way possible, never do any "mistakes" then often you'll be rejected anyway. Because a lot of time girl just isn't interested and it doesn't matter what you did, or how are your looks, body language, etc - more often than not rejection is about circumstances and about who is the girl instead of about who you are and what you did. This is why it is hard to become good just by yourself, because you don't need to find "what is working and what is not", you ne…
/r/seduction27/11/18 04:34 PM
3

Because this opening is certain fail in case women already know what this is pickup-line instead of you really wanting to know their opinion about this, lol.
/r/seduction27/11/18 04:31 PM
3

Bro, sorry but there is no much people who will watch 30 minutes video from some random noname (you don't have social proof in pickup community, sorry). In terms of pickup it would be considering as asking for "too much compliance" or "too much investment" too fast. You could try to make short video about main points, or short post with same content, and then add link to longer video which explains things in more detailed way. Even if we talk about videos from most famous PUA then shorter videos…
/r/seduction26/11/18 03:13 PM
2

Think about it - a lot of guys here work instead of going to uni. In most cases you couldn't meet girls at work, you know? Your situation just means you should do things same way as working guys - go meet girls at bars and clubs, find some hobby with girls participating in it, or use universal cheat code - street daygame. Your uni isn't only source of getting girls, you know? If you want girls from uni, then I assume there different universities in your city, you could approach near them, lol.
/r/seduction26/11/18 03:03 PM
1

I wouldn't fuck a woman unless she actually did something to deserve it - I'm much farther from being a rapist than average guy or you. Rather I'm as "anti-rapist" as someone could be.
/r/seduction26/11/18 02:19 PM
0

They act like this with guys who allow them it. Most guys never disqualify girls, never say negative things to them. If we talk about a girl "believing she is a 10 in looks" it is different from her believing what "she is worthy to have best she could". As about what we talk on this sub - girls attracted to a lot of different traits, unlike guys. For guy being confident and even to some extent arrogant is something what making him attractive, but it doesn't work so good for girls (actually her b…
/r/seduction26/11/18 02:17 PM
1

Actually second type should be called "girls who are 9 and 10 in opinion of majority of guys and from perspective of society as a whole". Those girls who are not like this and still think they are 9 and 10 are just delusional and this delusion is easily crushed by reality.
/r/seduction25/11/18 05:34 PM
3

RSD is most known and popular PUA brand, they have completely different coaches with different approaches, obviously they are not "scammers". But they are, first of all, do business, it means a lot of their stuff exist for marketing rather than really to help guys. Also there a lot of stuff what works with women, but don't sells and couldn't be popular because it is counter-intuitive. People are interested in fast and easy solution, in exaggerated promises which couldn't be fulfilled and in "coo…
/r/seduction25/11/18 05:28 PM
3

I wouldn't eat sweets because I'm meant for greater things.. Because I don't have enough money to spend on sweets. Makes sense (no).
/r/seduction25/11/18 05:22 PM
5

He isn't judging women based on their "emotional" attractiveness, for most guys the only criteria is her looks, why you assumed otherwise? And if we talk about judging women based on different rating systems then you couldn't just make them into one, this doesn't make sense. Instead you'll say what "she is 7/10 in looks, 6/10 in intelligence, 8/10 in emotional attractiveness, etc", otherwise rating system doesn't make sense if one guy talking only about looks and other about her emotional health…
/r/seduction25/11/18 05:20 PM
9

It is not like he have less challenges, on contrary he say his problem is what high standards become higher and you give advice to make those standards even higher, lol. But it is right what guys should stop appreciate women for their looks only, because looks are not only criteria of a good woman.
/r/seduction25/11/18 05:15 PM
2

And guess what - this guy she have a crush on, he don't know about this fact. It is possible what he think same way as you are, lol. But it seems you have very strange worldview about dating.. In most cases it is guy who initiate things while initially girl isn't interested in him at all. And then she become interested after guy started to try getting in her pants. Other way around is exception, not a rule. And those guys in whom girls interested by default, they are mostly someone who have a lo…
/r/seduction25/11/18 06:42 AM
-1

WTF? You said it yourself what some girls flirted with you. The fact what they have had boyfriend means shit, because young girls always in active search for someone new to take place of her bf or just to fuck her once or twice - humans are not monogamous by nature. I think it is more strange what you expect women to start flirting with you. Most guys almost never experience anyone just starting to flirt with them, including those guys who fuck more than 15 women per year. Women rarely proactive…
/r/seduction25/11/18 06:34 AM
1

Do guys take the train so what women approached them and begged to fuck them? Of course no, because this is something what happens very rare or rather never (same as a guy who approaching a girl in confident way - this is extremely rare). But would they enjoy it? Most guys would enjoy it even if it was a girl they don't want. Why the fuck you think what doing something good to a person is fine only if they expect it? And yes, approaching a girl it is always you doing good thing to her and she sh…
/r/seduction25/11/18 06:26 AM
5

I think you overthinking things and pay too much attention to being the guy who instead of having your own frame tries to please the girl. You seeking her reaction and base your action on it - it isn't good thing. You could escalate not from frame "I'm interested in you, I'm chasing you", instead real game is about making girl chase you and if we talk about being physical in this context then you are start from touching her in less sexual ways, so what she couldn't just claim what your touches h…
/r/seduction24/11/18 04:48 PM
10

If you are alone at her or yours place then this is always means she is down to fuck, but it is your job to make it so she don't feel slutty and used. Also don't forget what being physical doesn't mean doing it in purely sexual way. Some guys are really physical both with girls and with other guys, you could be very physical in a friendly way and it is the best way to start. You could start by becoming more physical with your guy friends, lol.
/r/seduction24/11/18 04:41 PM
1

Actually it doesn't really matter if instead of just being fun and nice you'll lead her to your place. You don't necessary need to show any sexuality before she at your house. You could talk to a girl like she is your cousin while leading her to your place and then you still fuck her by escalating things in your place.
/r/seduction24/11/18 04:40 PM
1

Polite rejection doesn't mean what she belittle you in any way. Well, 90% of all rejections exist not because girl dislike guy, specially if we talk about daygame then this is more about logistics, her mood and if she have anyone she already like.
/r/seduction24/11/18 04:37 PM
1

BS. It is even more easy to approach women in their headphones in. You stop them with a gesture and then use another gesture to make them take headphones off. And here you are already dominating situation, by making her following your lead.
/r/seduction24/11/18 12:06 PM
1

You would be shocked, but you too have power to judge her! And guess what. You could judge her behaviour of trying to judge you. In other words you could judge her for trying to judge you. Be the one who qualify people and if they try to qualify or disqualify you then you just can qualify their attempt to do this. It is really so simple. Stupid example - someone approaching you and saying "you are piece of shit, loser" and instead of trying to say "no, I'm not!!" or even thinking about it your t…
/r/seduction24/11/18 11:58 AM
1

Text game is unnecessary, really. Instead of just taking the number from a girl you could and should either making encounter into "instant date", or talk with her for few minutes and then setting your meeting before taking the phone. You could and should use text only for logistic purposes.
/r/seduction24/11/18 11:54 AM
1

Even in one-on-one situation with anyone there could be person who leads and control this small group and the person who following the lead and obey. Hierarchy is about who in control of others. Investment is about who in more control - the one who are less invested have more control, obviously. Dominance by definition isn't about being physically stronger or aggressive, it is about having control over others. This is why so called "betas" could be considered as lower in dominance hierarchy than…
/r/seduction24/11/18 02:07 AM
1

To make girl attracted to you it is enough to be higher in dominance hierarchy than he - and if you met her in circumstances where is only you and only she (for example daygame approach to single girl) then all what is matter is to her accepting you as someone of higher status than her. It doesn't matter how high you are in any other hierarchy if it is outside her knowledge.
/r/seduction23/11/18 03:45 PM
21

First of all what we try to learn isn't "what women like", it is "what type of guy I need to be and what to do to get results I want", for that we don't ask women, we ask men who got results we want to achieve. "All women different and they don't like same characteristics"? Oh, never knew what women are so unique, unlike men, because almost all men have very similar taste in women, if woman is hot then she would be considered as hot by majority of men. It is obvious what same goes for attractive…
/r/seduction23/11/18 12:19 PM
1

You have right to be rude to people you dislike.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/18 05:27 AM
1

The point is approaching women is less weird than just saying hi to everyone with no reason at all. Actually I think for most guys it would be harder to do than just approach women they find attractive, after all they have motivation to do it, they have a reason to act in this way. If you want to start from small things then just do something totally normal like asking for the time or place, then add compliment after you asked what you need. But more important thing is what type of mindset you h…
/r/seduction21/11/18 05:57 AM
2

If it is you started talking about sex and dating then she will think what you are interested in sex and dating with her, not vice versa, ok? When woman know for sure what you are interested in her it puts her in superior position where she could control if you get what you want or not. And about your second point - no, to pull girl to your place you don't need her to think about anything, moreover you don't need to make her think about those things by such stupid method as directly talking abou…
/r/seduction21/11/18 05:54 AM
1

WTF man, she basically RAPED him. Imagine fat guy starting to fuck sleeping girl and then when she yell about it he go to cops and claim it was her who raped him.. Does it make sense to you?
/r/TheRedPill21/11/18 05:39 AM
1

Unless you are in pro-social situation (like being in club, or whatever) saying hi to everyone is antisocial behaviour and people would see you as very strange (which is truth), it is actually worse than approaching girls to set a date with them or whatever. Some bad reactions could make your anxiety even stronger. Also why would you treat people the same?
/r/seduction20/11/18 02:53 PM
1

Just do approach anxiety program on goodlookingloser. Also why would you need to approach big groups anyway? Just do daygame, there countless single girls out there.
/r/seduction20/11/18 02:50 PM
1

Would you start chasing a guy who already showed complete interest in you? I know the answer is no. What you like guy do and what leads to you being attracted to him isn't same thing.
/r/seduction20/11/18 02:42 PM
2

Sex and dating is something you do instead of talking about it, ok. All this "conversation topics" thing is such a bs, it got so upvoted only because 90% people here are noobs who think in needy categories. Guys who are beta and needy don't try to find out how to stop being needy and beta, instead they want to know what to tell the girl so what she become interested, which tricks to use, etc.
/r/seduction20/11/18 02:40 PM
3

Anyone likes to feel empowered. But to get laid you don't need to make girl feel good about herself. You need to make her feel what your social status is at least equal to her, or much higher if you want her to chase you. And making her feel belittled is something what makes her feel what you are somehow superior to her - so yes, this works, this is why so called "abusive relationships" where man humiliates his woman (and she still stays with him) exist. But it isn't very effective to directly b…
/r/seduction13/11/18 04:52 PM
1

Just wanting to attract a woman and being afraid of "turning her off" is a wrong mentality WHICH creates your "first point" of seeking validation and approval. If you don't seek validation and approval then you don't care if she would be attracted or not, if you'll turn her off, or not. Fear of rejection is born because you want to get something from her and you need it. Of course if you want to get something from a person then you'll be somehow anxious about not able to, because it makes you fe…
/r/seduction13/11/18 04:43 PM
1

You don't need to be flirting all the time, only 2-3 hours of interaction between your first meeting and first sex. If you haven't slept with a girl within 3 hours of interaction then you'll fall in a friendzone, ok? It doesn't matter if this interaction was all within one day or you talked to her for 10-20 minutes for a few weeks. Overall this is the time within which girl lost any interested to fuck you and then it would be harder and harder, in most cases.
/r/seduction13/11/18 04:36 PM
2

To stop chasing women.. you don't need anything other than stop chasing them. It is as simple as that, there is no stage at which you need to make yourself "your highest version". The point isn't to make women chase you, the point is to stop chasing women so what you could feel confident and relaxed with them, no matter the result. SO what you could have great life even if there is no women in them, you just stop caring. When you don't really need women then you could get them easily.
/r/seduction13/11/18 04:26 PM
0

In my country people can't go to cops just because they are offended, so I don't really care.
/r/seduction13/11/18 04:23 PM
1

Reread my post. Yes, confidence of military guy could disappear with people who don't need to follow his commands. But confidence which he have in situation when people should obey him - this is real. Don't you understand? Confidence is situational. Hot girl ALWAYS feel confident when talking to needy beta - because she have control over him. It doesn't matter if his life achievement higher than her. What matters is control over other person by means of carrot or stick and by the fact what they …
/r/TheRedPill13/11/18 04:22 PM
1

Actually - you will. It is easy to "bluff" confidence and then people assume what you have something to back it up. People don't have psychic abilities, you see. And moreover confidence isn't about your "objective achievements", it is about control you have over others and how much control they have over you. If people can't make you feel bad no matter what they do.. and you could make them feel miserable just with words alone.. then does anything else matter? Confidence is about having power ov…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/18 05:13 PM
2

Wrong. "Real confidence" is very easy to achieve. It all depends on situation. For example in military "boom" - you have higher rank in hierarchy and here you go, feeling confidence when you are among people who should obey whatever you say them to do. When other people accept what you are above them and you know it then you will have confidence naturally. Confidence created by power you have over other people and by the fact what they don't have power over you. And power isn't about physical po…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/18 05:02 PM
1

Really? I could tell you one thing - no matter what you do most women would be not interested in you if you approach them randomly at streets and it has nothing to do with you. So without knowing how to have your self-image completely undependable from reactions and results you just couldn't build confidence if you do cold approaches and do them a lot. Your can't build your confidence on your "ability to connect" because you can't connect to all women, only to those who are open to form new conn…
/r/seduction12/11/18 04:52 PM
9

Guys start to read models to find out how to get laid. And then Mark mainly gives two completely opposite advices there - stop being so needy and.. change your life style completely to get women like you more. Just amazing I could say.
/r/seduction12/11/18 04:42 PM
3

Then it means what you are just new to all those self-improvement thing because he didn't said something new about it in either of his books. But if you liked it then you could read his new book which is completely about self-improvement instead of dating.
/r/seduction12/11/18 04:39 PM
1

Book named "make women chase you" and strangely enough it tells you about "best techniques to chase women". To make women chase you, first of all, you should stop chasing them. On fundamental level, not on level of techniques. And let me guess who is author of all those books... Isn't it you, hah?
/r/seduction12/11/18 04:38 PM
12

Yes, this is exactly what working if you are female. Sorry, but for guys things are not so simple.
/r/seduction12/11/18 08:01 AM
-7

Are you afraid to be rude to a little kid if you tease them? Girl wouldn't be like "hey, he is rude to me, fuck him". Some guys tell a girl what she is boring, should try better to impress them and actually being rude - and they still get laid. You don't need to even respect women to get them like you, you know? If you are not fine with her walking away from you, if you are afraid of her rejecting you then this is your real problem. There is no "line between teasing and being rude" because one g…
/r/seduction12/11/18 07:58 AM
3

Did you wanted to write it for advanced guys or for beginners? There is not a lot of "advanced" guys here, you know. Basically you trying to solve the problem which is very very rare. It is when advanced guy already got results with women, but still somehow not satisfied.. By my estimations most guys here struggle with just getting any more or less cute girl to be with them, let alone reaching satisfying sexual life and become bored with it. And pickup isn't exactly about "numbers chase for the …
/r/seduction11/11/18 05:43 PM
1

WTF? You saying "it is something you just made up" and then adding what trained doctors do it. Yes dude, exactly, for each case of rape there should be expertise done by professionals, this is how things do in a lot of countries and how it should be. Real rape is always accompanied by some sort of physical evidence, be it body damage or drugs in the blood. I have only one question for you - do you consider what "victim's claims" should be considered as direct evidence of something? That is all w…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/18 11:59 AM
1

You can't know what is "turn off" and what is not. Emotions are not controlled by people. If you ask then any girl will answer what teasing her or disqualifying her would be a big turn off, while guys who do this get laid much more than those who don't. Of course if you are directly say to a person what you are not interested in them then they could just give up on you. But if they are sure what you really want to be with them then this is so called "turn off" for most people, they stop trying t…
/r/seduction07/11/18 07:30 AM
1

Anyone get more attention from black girls because they are way more initiative and get way less attention from guys. This is obvious, isn't?
/r/seduction07/11/18 07:25 AM
0

Bullshit. Do you remember names of all low value random people you don't care about? If you forgot the name of your subordinate there is no real reason to apologise, you could do it if you pity him though, but there is no reason to feel sorry. If you care what she will be upset because you tell her "tell me your name again" then you are treating some random girl with too much care. It is "strong" to apologise when you are really was wrong and accept your wrongdoings. But this situation isn't the…
/r/seduction07/11/18 07:20 AM
1

Lack of hype and motivation are positive traits in attracting women, lol.
/r/seduction07/11/18 07:13 AM
1

The main thing is you have only one motivation to talk with women - romantic and sexual. And because of that you becoming dependent on her either giving you what you want or not. But being friends with girls is very good thing, and by "being friends" I don't mean those one sided relationships when guy entertain the girl and do things to please her, no. She also could and should do things for you, even more than you do for her - she should entertain you as well, do things for you (like cleaning y…
/r/seduction07/11/18 07:06 AM
1

You don't understand one simple fact - being high value in the head of the woman doesn't mean being high value objectively. You need to be higher value than her, more precisely. And it could be achieved with interaction alone, without anything else. As long as she accepts frame in which you are higher value than her, superior to her, then she will consider you as high value. And then her "base level she accustomed to" become total bullshit. This is why there are women who stay in so called "abus…
/r/seduction07/11/18 06:55 AM
1

It is almost impossible to never have any results with seduction. 99% guys will get their portion of success as long as they take smart action. If your results not so good then you should make you action smarter. And also making yourself better in other areas of life at the same time.
/r/seduction06/11/18 04:46 PM
4

To get women you don't need "to hit on them". You could make her attracting her without frame of "you trying to hit on her". Just talk to people in a friendly way, not in romantic way. Don't be afraid of becoming friends with girls. Guys get friendzoned not because they just friendly with them. You could (and should) friendzone girls. If you make her attracted to you then she will try to "have her way out of friendzone" and you'll have her chasing you instead of you being one who chase her. Best…
/r/seduction06/11/18 04:40 PM
2

Attraction work in a moment, it is not rational judgement. Women don't think "hey, this dude is high value, this one is low value, I should choose between them, lets rationally think about it". Woman just acts like she feels at the moment. If currently there is no other man around her other than you, physically, then it doesn't matter how much other men she have in her life (unless she have very strong emotional bounding with any of them). This is why cold approach work for anyone and actually g…
/r/seduction06/11/18 04:34 PM
3

There is much more to this. In real life your confidence is above everything else. In online confidence means nothing because in internet anyone could be fearless. Even most shy guy can make himself to message a girl online. Even most shy guy could curse people online even if they are far above him in value. This is why confidence doesn't mean so much online - it is way too easy to fake.
/r/seduction06/11/18 04:28 PM
1

How online dating made it harder for average guy? If he do approaches outside of online then his results wouldn't be too affected by online dating sites. And if there wouldn't be online dating then he wouldn't even have this choice from beginning. Without apps you wouldn't get her attention unless you know her in real life. And with apps if you approach in real life then you are already above all those other guys who try to make things work online. In other words online dating made real life gam…
/r/seduction06/11/18 04:26 PM
2

Real rape reported immediately in most cases. What isn't reported in allowable time frame is mostly cases when girl changed her mind after the sex for whatever reason. If woman don't report real rape case immediately then this is her problem. If someone beat your ass then it is too late to report them when traces of violence already don't exist and you don't have any proofs anymore. Just words of someone never should be considered as a proof of anything. If someone used violence against you then…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/18 01:42 PM
1

Most guys here are at newbie level, so posts for them are upvoted. Posts about more advanced topics not really popular here.
/r/seduction05/11/18 10:42 AM
1

Yes, don't overthink things, just go marry random girl who showed some interest in you. Plain and simple.
/r/seduction05/11/18 10:39 AM
2

All pickup is based on one fundamental fact - if woman don't know enough about you then she judge your value based on your frame, based on how you act with her and other people. In other words if she don't know anything about you then her only way to know if you are high value or not is to see your behavioural patterns in different situations (which is why so called "shit tests" exist, she create situation to see your value). Which is why traditional "outer game" pickup like Mystery method work …
/r/seduction05/11/18 10:18 AM
1

If getting hot girls is too important to you, then you wouldn't get them, counter-intuitive but true. Being in scarcity mindset and being needy are real fundamental problems most guys have. If you don't approach women at all then sure, you wouldn't get any of them. If you spend all your time alone then results wouldn't happen. But it has nothing to do with hobbies. Your hobbies never would be best way to meet new girls. There is no hobby what could be comparable to daygame or nightgame. And if y…
/r/seduction05/11/18 10:04 AM
1

By better things to do with their lives you mean to be in instagram, tinder and reddit 80% of their free time? You playing games is unrelated to success with women. What is related is you meet new women often or not. This is why tinder, clubbing and daygame exist. To allow people meet women outside of their social circle. When you approach new girl on street or in club it doesn't matter at all if you playing games. But if you start to brag about anything, be it how good you are in games, or how …
/r/seduction04/11/18 03:21 PM
0

Than "anyone"? If you do ten cold approaches a week you'll beat any photographer in terms of amount of women you meet. You think he just could fuck all of girls he photographing? Imagine situation - woman gives you a money to get photo done, you are in worker / client frame. Try to think about how will you make treating you as a man and fuck you? Could you do that? If you do, then there are many more ways to get laid for you. From photographer perspective you basically starting from something si…
/r/seduction04/11/18 03:17 PM
1

You wouldn't get any good results if your only source of meeting new women are some sort of hobby. And if you have other more effective source like daygame, online or clubs/bars then your hobbies don't matter at all. Advice to make your hobbies related to girls could be helpful only to people who are fine with finding first more or less cute girl who likes them and have LTR with her (i.e. desperate beta-guys who just want to find GF to not feel themselves like losers). It wouldn't lead to signif…
/r/seduction04/11/18 03:05 PM
1

If getting hot girls is that important to you, to the point of making you choose your hobbies based on what other people like, then you will struggle with women and it is unlikely what you'll ever really reach success with such retarded mentality. Women are just bonus in life, not main objective of it.
/r/seduction04/11/18 03:01 PM
1

This by itself wouldn't get you laid, but there is no way it could effect your success with women in any way as well. Same with any other "strange hobby". Choosing your hobby based on what girls like? Not needy at all..
/r/seduction04/11/18 02:57 PM
1

Brazilian jiu-jitsu allows you to restrain any person similar or lower to you in strength without leaving any damage to them, there is no real reason to tolerate abuse from someone weaker (unless in your country just touching a woman "without her consent" could be considered as assault). Though skill to stop any violence with words and make people respect you (and be afraid to some extent) without using force is one of the most important skill for a man, which could be achieved by frame control.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/18 02:08 PM
2

When real rape happens there are some proofs in 99% cases. There are special "vagina expertise" which could determine if forceful sex take place, for example. There a lot of ways to prove the rape, but victims claims are not one of them. Also real rapist are easily caught because this is serial thing almost always. There is hardly any rapist guy who will just rape one girl once and then never do it again.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/18 02:01 PM
1

Tinder is Tinder, real world is real world. When guy browsing a pornhub he will choose best looking woman to fap and girls by whom he could be captivated if he meets them IRL become "not good enough" for him. Tinder is basically porn site for women, just instead of porn they get attention and, sometimes, sex with very low chances for something more. You don't understand one fact - women don't want "just sex", they want to bound high value man to them. And their brain decide who is high value by …
/r/seduction04/11/18 01:39 PM
4

I think so called "pre-selection" isn't about "girls see what you get other girls and so they are attracted", I assume this is more like a "marker of high value". Hot girls want to be with high value man so if you are with hot girls other people assume what you are high value. So of course it would work same both with men and women. Though both men and women still could try to "shit test" you to see if you are really high value guy or just a fake. So some guys start to be respecting to you if th…
/r/seduction03/11/18 01:45 PM
2

There is nothing strange here. Hot girls are value marker in our society same as luxurious cars or branded clothes.
/r/seduction03/11/18 01:42 PM
2

You can't even see where is your real problem. You go from frame "how I could get a girl" and when you see a girl you would be like " I need to get her". And then you'll feel anxiety because you give her a power over your well being. You feel what either you get her approval or not is something what determines your status and who you are. She have total control over your feelings. You already trained yourself like a Pavlov's dog. You treat a girl like your superior by default. And girls are not …
/r/seduction03/11/18 01:09 PM
3

No, the point is you'll get what you want, either with her or without her. Your results don't depend on her personally, they depend on you. You don't need anything from her, you give her opportunity. You don't take value, you give it.
/r/seduction03/11/18 12:56 PM
1

I know from experience what there are girls who will be glad to be with me, where is self-deception here? And I don't ask girl for anything. I give her opportunity. You perceive it as a "trick" to get girl, it is not. It is different world view completely. I don't care what "works", I don't have objective to "get her at all costs", if she leaves it is her who lose, I get what I want in any case. If you don't believe what "you get sex with cute girl anyway" then you could change it to "I want to …
/r/seduction03/11/18 12:51 PM
1

To know what works and what doesn't you should try it, there is no way around it. A lot of people just stick around with something safe which works for them to some extent, but in this way you'll never improve.
/r/seduction03/11/18 12:33 PM
5

Main point is not to be dependent on a girl. If achieving what you want depends on others people rather than on you and achieving this is important then you'll become needy and off-putting. Because this other person have the power to give you something you need or reject you it makes you nervous and afraid of rejection. When you don't need anything from a person and confident what you'll get what you want whether with them or not then all your anxiety just goes away, you become confident and rel…
/r/seduction03/11/18 12:31 PM
0

Looks doesn't matter as long as you are not super ugly or super good looking. If you are super ugly it would be a problem, if you are super good looking it will make things much easier. But for other 80% of people looks doesn't really matter. If you have good genetics and could achieve SGL level though then you should try.
/r/seduction27/10/18 12:26 PM
2

People who win lottery - less than 0,001%. People who fuck women - more than 80% of adult men.
/r/seduction27/10/18 12:22 PM
1

Getting escorts is experience which could help you. At least it will make you free from V card if you care about it at all (you wouldn't mention it if you didn't care though). Getting girls isn't "result" it is process, you know.
/r/seduction27/10/18 12:21 PM
1

What do you mean? You say this not to chase her, but to let go of your anxiety and just do whatever you want. Including touching her in a way you want, talking in a way you want, etc. You could be as rough and direct as you want, even to the offensive degree. It seems people just don't understand how it could work. I can do nothing about it.
/r/seduction25/10/18 04:34 AM
1

I use it in daygame. No matter what you do you'll be rejected in most cases anyway. With it you have control. And full right to do whatever you want without holding yourself back. Including crazy escalation, expressing yourself completely, etc. I didn't explained why it works, it seems it wasn't as obvious as I thought it is.
/r/seduction25/10/18 04:33 AM
1

My post is more or less is expanded for the sake of this one: http://insurgentmedia.tv/rejecting-part-womans-process-becoming-attracted/ This "technique" have only one main objective - allow you to do whatever you want and say whatever you want without holding yourself back, at the same time without "forcing" yourself on a girl, so even if you do something socially unacceptable you know she is completely fine with it. Why would you care if she is fine? Because if you want to touch her ass in fir…
/r/TheRedPill25/10/18 04:29 AM
1

My post is more or less is expanded for the sake of this one: http://insurgentmedia.tv/rejecting-part-womans-process-becoming-attracted/ What this phrase do is allowing you completely ignore everything else she do without losing your frame, because you don't consider it as rejection any more. Giving her power? Without saying my phrase she already have power to reject you, because in society you couldn't just pursue woman "to the end", if she isn't interested you would be forced to stop, but in m…
/r/TheRedPill25/10/18 04:19 AM
0

You are going from completely different frame compared to me. I don't try to "win girl" or "seduce her" and I don't perceive them like "yes or no girls". When people do something what I dislike I perceive it like them doing something wrong and not being themselves, it is never about me. If she don't want to change herself to her "better side" and "true self" then I just would be disappointed in her, what is all. No blame or hate. Just because she showed me her bad side initially doesn't mean wha…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/18 12:45 PM
1

I can't see anything said about muscle gain, it was mentioned what muscle recover faster, even compared to accelerated muscle recovery from steroids. If muscle growth rates are truth then it would be cool, such glove cost less than 1000$ which isn't a lot compared to cost of steroids and one year in gym.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/18 04:23 AM
1

I think what first of all you shouldn't come from the frame which allows her to reject you. If she rejects you it means you need something from her and approached to get it. Why is it? Men don't really need anything from women, it is they who need us. You could be attracted to a girl, having sex with her could be nice, but you don't need her validation or sex, so what is rejection anyway? I assume you could be cool, so I talk to you, but I don't need anything and you could do whatever and I coul…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/18 03:32 AM
2

Just some posts here on red pill directly say you this "I looked like shit and no one fucked me, then I started to life and girls start flocking on me and I get unlimited pussy effortlessly!". Which could be truth if you not only lift, but have top genetics and if you are fine with sub-par girls or very rare hot ones. Main reasons to lift should be what it makes you feel better and to some extent healthier (as long as you not overdo things).
/r/TheRedPill22/10/18 03:27 AM
1

Do you believe what just become fit guy will completely solve your sex life? Sure it will make it easier, but you still should make a lot of efforts to approach, unless you are fine with sub-par women. Though you could get some nice ones (sometimes) if you have good genetics.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/18 03:21 AM
2

Probability of getting 8-10/10 girl in this way not very high. I know some very good looking guys with awesome body and they indeed approached by some women.. But most of those women I wouldn't ever want to fuck. Though it could be different in western countries, but in former Soviet Union being fit isn't enough to get laid with hotties.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/18 03:16 AM
3

Oh lol. DO you understand what if this guy start to approaching women on the street he STILL WOULD BE REJECTED BY MAJORITY? If he want to bang hot women and a lot of them then even with such looks he should either use Tinder, or go to clubs, or approach on street. He wouldn't get a lot women if he don't even talk to them, lol. And no, he couldn't "pull every chick in the club". Even hottest of guys would be rejected by majority of women if they take initiative to approach. On the other hand hot …
/r/TheRedPill22/10/18 03:10 AM
3

You going from wrong perspective. Yes, she is being nasty and this what makes it much more enjoyable when she will call you master or daddy while begging you to fuck her. Usually the more nasty girl the more hardcore masochist she is.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/18 03:04 AM
1

When someone openly disrespect you what would you do? Think about it, if some guy say shit to your face would you just swallow and go away as if nothing happened? But on the other hand you shouldn't antagonise people, this is where things get tricky. Basically you should "frame crush" people, but then tell them what you actually "believe what they are actually nice people" and what they shouldn't act "out of character" like this.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/18 02:59 AM
1

Some people like to fuck "taken" women, this is sort of fetish which adds to the process. If you don't feel pleasure from corrupting married woman then it is probably not worth it indeed.
/r/seduction21/10/18 05:27 AM
1

You need to plate girls instead of having only one at a time. Then you wouldn't care about her spending time with you or not.
/r/seduction20/10/18 04:36 PM
1

It is not like having gf and being faithful to her adds you authority on seduction forum, there is no reason to add this. If you talked to her normally and then started to ignore her after she said something wrong then it is fine too, as long as this is what you want and not attempt to manipulate her, the main point is not react emotionally.
/r/seduction20/10/18 04:22 PM
1

Google fedora, then click "gentleman" in image section and you'll see pretty cool fat neckbeard in fedora, lol. Being cool is something what could be seen in interactions and body language rather than in image though. When you tell about "fat neckbeard in fedora" then it is hard to imagine him interacting with people in a cool way, but it is indeed possible, just less likely. Also, depending how "strange" are your looks and how far you from "social standard of being cool" people could start more…
/r/seduction20/10/18 04:07 PM
2

You should focus on stop chasing girls. You need to understand one truth - you don't need girls to be satisfied with your life, you don't need them to be happy, you don't need them to validate your value as a person. You could be interested in a girl, but it doesn't mean you need her and should cling to her and chase her. You don't really need girls in your life to be happy, moreover you don't need "force" (by pickup techniques, telling her how amazing you are, by trying to be funny, etc) girl t…
/r/seduction20/10/18 03:51 PM
2

You asking something like "crazy people act crazy, how to deal with them?". Answer is simple - don't interact with crazy people. Reacting like this to someone's affection is not normal by any means.
/r/seduction17/10/18 09:56 AM
2

Depending on situation if your friend act like this it could be considered as disrespect and the only right reaction on disrespect is directly say what you don't like this sort of behaviour, this is called having boundaries, you know. Being cool is fine if you really being cool, not acting cool to impress people. If you care about something then you should tell people what they shouldn't act like this with you.
/r/seduction17/10/18 09:54 AM
1

Rather than show disinterest most advices tell you to show both interest and disinterest. You are interested in her, but not sure yet if she is a good choice. If you are TOO SURE what you like her from the start and believe what you truly need her at all cost then this is what we call neediness.
/r/seduction17/10/18 09:44 AM
2

Its not like something important happened, just interact with her like normal. Don't make it such a big deal.
/r/seduction17/10/18 09:37 AM
1

Resource you "lose" while doing cold approach is "amount of girls" (though not really, reapproaching same girl months later would be almost same as approaching new girl), but in city with 300k people or more this resource is almost unlimited.
/r/seduction16/10/18 09:46 AM
2

Making 30 approaches a week will take less time than going out 3 nights a week. Actually it take about ten minutes to make 5-10 approaches and you can do it while going somewhere you need to go anyway, while following your usual routine. Your way to getting girls will work, but it is hardly more cost effective, unless you live in very small city and it isn't something what any random guy without experience could do, moreover a lot of people just not interested in "nightlife".
/r/seduction16/10/18 09:42 AM
2

He just started. Your lay rate statistic is for newbie without game or skills. This guy get his statistic just from 1-2 months of starting. Advanced guys get at least 5 lays per 100 approaches average, don't forget what one approach takes about 1 minute and in case it was longer you at least enjoyed interaction. Moreover your "reward" isn't sex only, with right mindset or with enough experience you'll start to actually enjoy process itself, this is not work, but the game. And what sort of organi…
/r/seduction16/10/18 09:38 AM
5

"I really don't know what to do" What to do to achieve what? You should stop trying to impress her or try to get in her panties, or try to make her your gf, whatever. Take attitude what you need nothing from her and not afraid of anything she could do or say, just be yourself. "I'm fine if you don't like me or not interested in me, I don't need anything from you and just do what I feel like to do and say what I feel like to say". Let go of your desire to be closer to her, you don't need it. Your…
/r/seduction15/10/18 07:43 AM
1

This example not really right, as long as woman don't know what this guy do bad amoral things it couldn't effect her in any way. And moreover there are studies which prove what school bullies have much more sex than their peers. So being good person isn't something what makes you attractive, being best self doesn't mean being good person or nice guy, but being confident and no needy. And strangely enough but most guys who are confident and no needy from the start (compared to those who reach thi…
/r/seduction15/10/18 05:47 AM
1

Everything is great as long as you truly like it. Stop expecting validation from people and trying being cool. Stop chasing girls and sex, you are fine without getting it, it wouldn't affect who you are. Instead of trying to fuck girl and be liked by her try to enjoy yourself and being yourself. How to do this? DO what you want in a moment, without thinking about reaching some sort of objective. Treat sex as something what will come to you naturally instead of something what you need to chase an…
/r/seduction13/10/18 03:40 AM
1

If you were able to read properly then you should be able to see what I said "treat women's words" instead of "treat women" which have different meanings. Woman could be "logical human being" when she does some work which require intelligence and choosing your sexual /romantic partner is something what most people do based on their emotions instead of logic, this is more the case for women. So in "man to woman" interaction woman is someone who is guided by her emotions instead of logic, this is …
/r/seduction07/10/18 04:35 PM
1

This isn't about treatment, this is about your understanding of reality. Her saying "lets be friends" is attempt to make you submit to her frame, what you should do is to hold your own frame instead, this is as simple as this.
/r/seduction07/10/18 02:53 PM
0

Man with options unlikely will be ever friendzoned. And if she tries to say "lets be friends" while you two know each other for less than 2 hours then this is just one of shit tests which is easy to ignore. Why would you treat women's words seriously and try to talk with her on logical level as if she is intelligent human being instead of someone who is just guided by her emotions?
/r/seduction05/10/18 02:14 AM
1

First of all why the fuck you "stop" move on with your life when meeting a girl? Just because you meet new girl doesn't mean what you should stop searching for other girls.
/r/seduction05/10/18 02:12 AM
1

It is fine to do what you want, but you should meet other girls instead of waiting your next date with her, to the point what you could forget about her existence before remembering "oh, there was this girl I could fuck who kinda friendzoned me".
/r/seduction05/10/18 02:10 AM
1

You should prioritize any of your important businesses than her and this is she who should be afraid to lose you, no other way around. If a girl "run away" from you it means what she wasn't attracted enough and you haven't created right frame for your relationships.
/r/seduction05/10/18 02:07 AM
0

Going to gym 3 times a week is more than enough to get max results though, unless you use steroids, 4-6 times a week will make you overtrained.
/r/seduction05/10/18 02:04 AM
-1

" So I'm a very needy and introverted guy who is also a 25 year old virgin. " This is why you feel "freaking awesome" from something very ordinary. For you she is much high value than yourself, obviously you'll feel good what "the queen" approved you and this is one of the main reasons why you have problem with women at all.
/r/seduction05/10/18 02:02 AM
1

If you feel yourself superior to majority of other people in your school and higher in social status then no harm in approaching.
/r/seduction04/10/18 04:57 PM
3

Because for your brain rejection proving you what she consider what you are not as good as she is and not as good as a guys who'll fuck her , for the brain this is same thing as being humiliated, but in case of rejection you couldn't do anything to retaliate without being an asshole. Of course people wouldn't like to be humiliated, feeling themselves inferior without any moral ground for revenge. Guys wouldn't have any approach anxiety if in case of rejection they could humiliate this woman back…
/r/seduction04/10/18 04:51 PM
2

Strategically this opening and your answers are low value shit. This will work (more often than not) in case you are confident and just say it for fun instead of really meaning it and asking her permission and then telling her "oh, i'm such a loser what every girl rejected me until i met youu", it wouldn't be good even if you are not serious, if you are joking around anyway why wouldn't you say something like "guide told me what if she does [insert here whatever she did] then it means she alread…
/r/TheRedPill26/09/18 04:16 PM
7

They are different. If a hot girl start to approach random guys with objective to have sex then she'll have much higher success rate than even most handsome guy even if he have good game could ever have. Moreover handsome guy with bad game and unattractive personality probably will have success rate close to zero. Also if you are not into fat girls then you'll probably couldn't be sexually excited by them at all. And this is not the case for women, basically anyone with skilful fingers could mak…
/r/seduction20/09/18 05:43 PM
2

I personally think what "attraction" is wrong concept by itself. You'll be rejected by most girls in any case while doing cold approach for reasons which have nothing to do with her liking you or not. Even hottest man in the world would be rejected by majority of women if he randomly approach them on the street and ask for a number or date.
/r/seduction20/09/18 05:40 PM
3

Not all people enjoy spending lots of time in social circles. And if you forgot OP doesn't meet women in his social circle, each of social events he mentioned don't have women in them. Main point is more about mentality than circumstances. If you feel like you selling something while approaching girls then it doesn't matter if they are in social circle or not.
/r/seduction21/08/18 10:35 PM
0

One of the reason you react in this way could be what you don't really know how to emotionally satisfy yourself in sex. Sex God Method is a good book to make sex much more fulfilling instead of feeling as if it was masturbation session. Without emotional satisfaction even most gorgeous girl wouldn't make sex amazing and almost no one among girls know how to really satisfy guy on emotional level.
/r/seduction21/08/18 10:32 PM
3

Agree with you. If someone feels like he is selling product while approaching women then he have something fundamentally wrong with his mindset. I treat my approaches as giving a girl chance to be with me, "win me" and if she ignores this chance then I pity her instead of myself. But this all goes from one most important point - you need to value what she could get from being with you much higher than what you could get from being with her. First step to achieve this is to stop overvaluing sex. …
/r/seduction21/08/18 10:16 PM
1

For most guys get laid isn't "just to get laid", this is hard work and main objective of all interactions with women. For more or less attractive woman to have sex is "just to get laid", you could do that effortlessly. And some men indeed require manipulation to start having fulfilling sex lives, because otherwise they wouldn't find anyone. Of course those guys often change themselves in process and no longer need to use any manipulation. And you forget what for a lot of guys those qualities not…
/r/seduction21/08/18 10:53 AM
3

But you dated them it means they reached their goal, lol.
/r/seduction20/08/18 01:48 PM
14

You talk about property damage and guy asked about straight up killing.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 09:11 AM
3

You don't need to say what you are virgin, you could say (lie) what you have had some girls, but it was too long ago and you are not very experienced. Virginity of a man is not different from being inexperienced , there is no way to differentiate between those two. You even could have tens of girls at your teens and then didn't have sex for years and in this way your skill would be lost and there wouldn't be real difference to virgin. So if this is virginity what you care about, then this is eas…
/r/seduction19/08/18 09:37 PM
1

BTW this quote is bullshit "As of now more than 60% of all men in their 20s are Sōshoku danshi. Here is the wiki for the phenomenon: Herbivore men - Wikipedia" Not 60% of all men, but 60% of men who is single in their twenties and thirties. And only about 30% of men are single in their thirties, i.e. you could get what only 20% of men (lowest tier) become so called herbivore. Guy who answered on quora most likely just try to falsify facts to make his point more extreme.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/18 09:26 PM
1

Exactly. No one tries to make Americans fat by selling them fastfood, this is just consequence. Fast food, games, porn - all they exist because of natural demand and if there is demand then there are people who'll make money from that as long as this isn't against the law. Anyway, all in all people should care only about their own happiness and happiness of people close to them, why you should care about fate of your country or humanity as a whole as long as it doesn't affect your own life and m…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 10:33 AM
13

You don't consider the fact what younger women don't take initiative at all. Only past-wall women will pursue guys actively and for women in their late thirties and forties 50 years old or close to that is optimal candidate. Of course this study doesn't mean what 50 years old guys are peaking for getting young girls, lol. For getting young women more easily you should be either in late twenties or in early thirties.
/r/seduction16/08/18 07:06 AM
14

This isn't about when you want to fuck, this is about when other people want to fuck you. And this would be news for you, but most guys want young women. Even guys in their forties would prefer girl in her early twenties. Now at 44 you are desirable only by guys who can't get any younger girls, or have strong milf fetish, this is faar from the peak.
/r/seduction16/08/18 07:04 AM
-1

This is very understandable and make perfect sense. Single women start actively seeking men when they are past-past wall i.e. 40-45 years old and they are interested mostly in older guys, so in this way you get peak at 50. It isn't a peak to get 18 years old girls, lol. And of course younger women in their late teens would be most popular because they are best in terms of looks and statistically have had less amount of dicks in their pussies.
/r/seduction16/08/18 06:55 AM
1

And? This is same thing when large company buys different profitable sites and monopolize it - same thing happened with google, youtube, etc. This fact proves my point - just check revenue of this company. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MindGeek
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 06:48 AM
1

They pay for programming to providers of TV, not to the channels (at least in my country), same way you pay for internet. Also - if something could be get for free it doesn't meant what no one would buy it. Nowadays you could get almost any computer game for free by downloading it with torrent, but steam is still as prosperous as it always was. Porn niche is very profitable, I did read how people earn good money just by uploading porn on pornhub and similar sites with ads in them (blackhatworld)…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 06:34 AM
1

Not in any country btw. There are countries which restrict immigration from them.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 06:26 AM
-4

He probably meant what it is much easier to be Chad in Japan. And if you look their porn - you'll understand what this is indeed so. It is not Yakuza who crush it with women, this is just any above average guy who could be considered as a beta by american standards.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/18 08:41 PM
15

Same way we don't care about ugly fat old women and this not likely to be changed even if their percentage would be higher than now.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/18 08:29 PM
4

Em, in which country you could have many kids with many girls without consequences? You would need not abundance mentality here, you would need abundance of money which he don't have.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/18 08:21 PM
2

Oh lol, do you understand what a person could go to prison for sexual harassment by just doing some cold approach there? You can't take responsibility for something out of your control, you should either accept enforced rules or change the place of your living.
/r/seduction15/08/18 08:11 PM
0

If you know English well enough to post here and read sub then you could immigrate some day later.
/r/seduction15/08/18 08:07 PM
1

I think there is no real reason for a guy to build LTR or family before he is in his late twenties or early thirties. So there is no harm to view women as someone for sex purposes only if you are in your early twenties.
/r/seduction15/08/18 08:07 AM
3

This is same question as "how people making any money from TV if everything is free?". Free sites make money from adverts and porn itself is created on paid sites where you could get full version of videos and earlier access. You could get mostly short videos for free and 80% of porn is paid product. And, funny enough, people pay for it and pay a lot. For example site of brazzers is one of the most profitable sites in the world. This has nothing to do with society - there a lot of people who wan…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/18 07:37 AM
1

Those guys you mentioned just changed one way to get plethora of endorphins to others. Eventually they do all great things they do to feel great (just not by having sex, but by having higher amount of resources, status, etc), eventually our brain works in a way what all we do is to feel great, this is how we programmed. And you are wrong - society has nothing to do with that, this is not society who wants men to jerk off and be sexually addicted, this is men who wants it because sex and masturba…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/18 07:33 AM
1

If you sleep with tens and hundreds of women then there always could be such woman and even if one out of hundred falsely accuse you of rape then your life would be much worse.
/r/seduction07/08/18 06:58 PM
1

You don't need to be real friends and make any efforts to become that. You giving her a chance for the friendship and if she takes initiative to do something good for you, if she do those necessary efforts first, then you could think about making some yourself. And if she did things for you without you returning anything to her then she probably just wouldn't take initiative anymore. And if she asks you to do something you don't want you always could say "no".
/r/seduction07/08/18 06:54 PM
0

"Just so you know, I'm not going to sleep with you tonight." If you do everything right then this phrase should be said by you first, lol.
/r/seduction05/08/18 10:31 AM
1

Em, no. In humans sex exist not to make children. It exist to make human male to not run away from human female after the kid is born and to force him to stay away with them and take care of them. This is why sex is so pleasant to us and we are ready to do it everyday (I'm talking about guys with healthy libido). This is one of the couple bounding mechanisms in homo-sapiens. But I agree about being fine without women. If talking just about sex then in modern society you could be sexually satisfi…
/r/seduction05/08/18 10:29 AM
2

Depending on circumstances and level of your game you could skip steps. For example in the club it could be normal to hug girl soon after opening her. And doing things to please the girl and only doing things you are sure she wants is mentality which could be good only for beginners. What I like more than escalation of kino is escalation of commands. You say the girl to do something and then she do. Eventually you could "command" her to hug you or even to kiss you and as long as you hold your fr…
/r/seduction05/08/18 10:14 AM
1

Monotonous voice is something you could change. You could temporarily change it just by trying and some exercises you could find online easily. It is as simple as set your tonality between how you sing and how you usually talk.
/r/seduction05/08/18 10:11 AM
0

Let me tell you - about 80% of young people are not fat and not too ugly, but they still struggle to reach their goals in sex and relationships. Being fuckable doesn't mean that you'll be fucked. Also there is difference between genders - basically women could be sexually excited by anyone depending on circumstances. Basically fat ugly guy could make any normal woman cum with his fingers alone. This is scientifically proven and also proven by history of prostitution - all prostitutes become wet …
/r/seduction03/08/18 02:05 PM
0

For guy looks don't play significant role as long as you have strong game or social status. Girls go for your looks only if you don't have anything else to offer them.
/r/seduction02/08/18 04:23 AM
0

This is how society is, you either know it and accept, or living in illusions about the world. This is your choice. It is not me who made society in this way, I just accept reality as it is.
/r/seduction02/08/18 03:59 AM
-1

There are guys who approached hundreds of women without any solid results. So no, you definitely need a book on how to approach depending on your current level of social skills.
/r/seduction01/08/18 05:34 AM
2

There is no "rules" and this has nothing to do with morality or whatever. This is about consequences of such a choice. And so called "man-slut" isn't a guy who fuck a lot of girls, this is rather guy who are ready to give his resources to any girl and have no standards. Woman with low standards will fuck anyone, man with low standards will date anyone. And in case of latter he even could be faithful to this random girl who are ready to fuck him (often just because he can't find anyone else or to…
/r/seduction31/07/18 07:49 PM
3

Clubs, parties, streets. Daygame exist for a reason. Also there a lot of different activities in which you could meet new girls, there are some posts about those here on seddit.
/r/seduction29/07/18 02:43 PM
2

Before asking what you can offer you should know what women want. They don't want your social skills, status, or money, at least not in short term interaction which is seduction is about. What they want is to have proof of her being attractive (don't give her that until she deserve), emotions (both positive and negative) and eventually submit to a man. As long as you could give her that then she will be glad to please you and seek your validation. And to give her emotions you don't need to feel …
/r/seduction29/07/18 02:35 PM
5

Sluts are not suitable for long term relationships and family, there is no "shaming" in that, this is just objective fact. As a fuckbuddy sluts are great though.
/r/seduction29/07/18 02:26 PM
3

Everyone keeping score before first 30 or so. If you are girl and already don't keep your score then there is bad new for you.
/r/seduction29/07/18 05:12 AM
1

And yes, to most guys on this sub it matters and this tells his real objective results in few lines.
/r/seduction29/07/18 05:11 AM
1

Number of girls is objective criteria to success with women. Happiness is bullshit.
/r/seduction29/07/18 05:10 AM
2

Go get system by todd it is focused on outer game and from what I see so far it is best product what were created about it ever. You could get it today for 150$ (and then get refund in 60 days if you don't like it), or await for pirated version few months later. I wanted to buy it, but I can't because I'm from RUssia.
/r/seduction29/07/18 05:09 AM
2

You can't offer much to women because of bad personality that is 95% and genetics has nothing to do with that. Women want emotions, not your genes. Also you could lose your virginity with hooker or prostitute hundreds of times, you could fuck hundreds of women as long as you have money, if sex is really something you are interested. And in doing this you could become very good in sex, to the point of being able to make any girl cum with you and this would be something you could "offer" to girls.…
/r/seduction29/07/18 05:01 AM
1

Some women tell they couldn't make decisions for themselves even if they are sober and so they could change their opinion about after sex if this wasn't good enough then she didn't give the consent. Even though such fucked up girls are rare, but society now helps them out to some extent.
/r/seduction29/07/18 04:55 AM
2

Then you should see not definition plastered on your college campus (it has nothing to do with real law), you should see definition in the law by which people would be judged.
/r/seduction29/07/18 04:54 AM
1

You are wrong. Go to wiki and what we see? "It recognizes that a victim can be incapacitated by drugs and alcohol and unable to give valid consent." This is "incapacitated" (!!!) dude, not just drunk. So no, she should be too drunk. And overall this is fucked up in case both guy and girl are drunk to same extent then it is girls who is raped? Why is this, does guy could give his consent to fuck ugly girl if he is too drunk? This is discrimination.
/r/seduction29/07/18 04:52 AM
4

If you are in your mid 20s it doesn't mean what you should go for girls in mid 20s. You could fuck younger girls as long as it is legal.
/r/seduction29/07/18 04:45 AM
1

And then those cool guys become married and fucked up by girls (and eventually divorce raped), or get false rape report on them. Amount of guys who could get laid with more than ten girls per year without any knowledge is very-very low and most of them could do that only because of their social circle.
/r/seduction01/07/18 05:25 AM
0

Bootcamps have higher price than piano lessons obviously - because to master piano you should have hundreds of lessons and to master game even 5-10 "lessons" should be more than enough. Moreover those are just different levels of objective. Get laid with women is as important to most men as become wealthy. And now compare any pickup pricing to that of MBA.
/r/seduction01/07/18 05:18 AM
1

Wow, I'm amazing - my projection become actual biology of humans.
/r/seduction30/06/18 01:26 PM
1

Try to change your mindset to one where it is girl who should earn the sex, not you. She do things for you, entertain you and then after a while she could earn her portion of fuck. Also your answer isn't actually amplifying it because it is realistic numbers (it is very much possible to achieve), it could be better to say "Well I want to hit a ten thousands by Friday smirk" or something - if you want to answer in playful way then you'd better make it absurd so what it was obvious for her that th…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/18 01:08 PM
1

I have seen as guys without first factor (one of them fat, others are skinny and average looking at most) get laid easily (with hotties obviously) with teasing and frame alone. You don't need to be attractive - you need to have enough social (or physical, or psychological) power so what people couldn't attack you (either with words or actions) for your teasing in case you overdo things.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/18 12:46 PM
4

Most girls are crazy sensitive to teasing from someone they already consider as beta. And if she perceive you as alpha then she will swallow your teasing even if she dislike it.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/18 12:41 PM
7

I disagree about your last sentence. With younger girls (16-20 years old) it works in daygame as well. And in social circle it works as well as long as you have support of your friends and your group is highest value and all other groups don't dare go against yours - then you basically could get all the girls of the circle for yourself.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/18 12:38 PM
1

Rather than that you could have a audio-recording of the process where she eventually ask (or beg) you to fuck her hard - then your chances of fake rape case would be minimal - she wouldn't go to police as long as she knows you have solid proofs. There are other ways what would make chance for this shit minimal - and it was discussed more than once here on TRP. Some guys here fucked hundreds of women without any sort of legal problems.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/18 09:08 AM
1

Guys who want just to find one "right girl" and never fuck anyone else for their entire life is minority and they cheat themselves. Man couldn't be sexually satisfied with one woman in his life - this is how our physiology works.
/r/seduction29/06/18 07:25 AM
1

You missed another point - game and seduction comes to play when you want to sleep with A LOT of different women and moreover so if you do daygame and cold approach - without proper game even your looks can't save you from too low success rate.
/r/seduction27/06/18 04:42 AM
1

You don't understand. There is different objectives - all so called "overcomplicated things" are based on premise what you'll approach thousands of women to fuck hundreds of them. This is the Game. If you just want to find some girlfriends then you don't need it.
/r/seduction27/06/18 04:22 AM
1

You don't understand women. They have same looks standards as most men and even a little lower. And what about average man? We are ready to fuck anything more or less cute - more than 70% of girls are passable for most of us to have boner. Same goes for girls - more than 70% of guys have passable looks for most girls. Moreover there is difference between genders. Woman could become wet and sexually excited on ANY FUCKEN GUY. Do you need a proof? If it wasn't the case then there wouldn't be prost…
/r/seduction27/06/18 04:12 AM
1

Woman will chase you only in case she knows you are not fully interested in her. Your looks are only small part of attraction and could be ignored - there are guys who really ugly but still fuck hot girls.
/r/seduction24/06/18 03:37 AM
3

Some guys prefer chubby girls for some reason or other. There are some fat fetishists who want to fuck only fatties girls and even not attracted to normal girls. Sure such guys are minority but they exist. Or else there wouldn't exist any porn with extremely fat women.
/r/seduction23/06/18 06:03 AM
1

How is this related to anything in the list, lol?
/r/seduction23/06/18 05:07 AM
1

Just google Woujo humour. There is detailed guide.
/r/seduction20/06/18 06:10 AM
1

You shouldn't entertain them. Rather you are using their presence to amuse yourself. Even if they could dislike when you tease them or don't find what you say funny.
/r/seduction20/06/18 06:07 AM
4

Obviously what this is most obvious and popular - author Mark Rippetoe and you could see it as first result in google.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 05:48 AM
2

First of all in healthy family husband never allows his wife to go on vacation without him. I can't see what is black pill in the fact that there are women who fucks random guys behind their husband's back - this is common knowledge. But it doesn't meant what it is a rule instead of exception.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/18 06:29 PM
3

Because all women who go to clubs/bars as their entertainment are sluts doesn't mean what all women are sluts. You couldn't meet a woman who wouldn't cheat on her husband in pub, or club - because she just wouldn't go there and the only places where you can meet her is her work, her home and when she is with her kids. Here in Russia common family lives in such way - at day both husband and wife work, at evening both husband and wife at home. If guy allows his gf or wife to go "have fun with frie…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/18 06:23 PM
2

Approaching stranger on day is uncomfortable and not completely accepted by society. Approaching in club is considered normal. By approaching girls while you are with your friends you make them uncomfortable because it touch their insecurities, that is why they react in this way. They couldn't approach a random girl even if they want. And they don't like what you could do that, obviously. No one likes to feel inferiority to his friends.
/r/seduction17/06/18 05:00 PM
1

You assume what he wants to date her and have relationships with her. And this is hardly the case. Actually it is easier to fuck (in short time frame) girls with shitty personality as long as you have boundaries and don't take shit from her. She could be unsuitable for LTR, but so are most girls out there. Casual sex is completely different matter.
/r/seduction17/06/18 04:56 PM
-1

Why the fuck you should date her? Her personality doesn't matter for ONS or meeting her one time per month for some sex.
/r/seduction17/06/18 04:53 PM
0

If you want to impress me then you should try something better than to brag about other guys. I prefer to talk about girls, not guys.
/r/seduction17/06/18 04:52 PM
3

Already more than 1200+. Funny images working good in any sub. Even if the advice is bs, but don't forget what most guys here don't have much experience in seduction and pickup, advices for intermediate and advanced guys almost never upvoted. 90% of community is noobs who fucked less than ten women in their life, this is just how it works statistically so there is nothing wonderful about such simple (and wrong) advices get upvoted, moreover if they done with image.
/r/seduction16/06/18 07:14 PM
2

The best place to have meal with a girl is your place. And second best - is at her home.
/r/seduction16/06/18 06:57 PM
1

If a girl see how you are popular among other people (including other girls) then she would be attracted even if your looks are below average. Most people don't delude themselves but just know from experience what even if girl isn't interested initially you could fuck her as long as you hold your frame. Your looks affect your results, but it is just a part of attraction. And even if we talk about girls with below average looks then they could get guy who isn't interested in them initially. All i…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/18 03:38 PM
1

People have different types of libido, for some guys sex are very important even if they don't connect it to their "true value" and for others they don't enjoy sex by itself, only doing it for orgasm and validation. Though I understand how it can become boring after 10-20 years of overindulging.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/18 03:10 PM
2

Justin Bieber always have had more female fans than Bruce Willis. Having beautiful cute face works as good (if not better) as having masculine face.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/18 03:00 PM
1

Looks are just one of many factors. It is as if you live in some different reality and don't see real world.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/18 02:48 PM
3

Sex by itself isn't as important for your satisfaction as validation from the fact what girls want you, respect you and ready to do things for you. Your brain like when the world tells you what you awesome. And when you fuck prostitutes your brain feels what women are not attracted to you naturally and it don't like it.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/18 02:38 PM
1

If you have crappy style then it could deduct about 1-2 points from your actual normal looks. So OP wasn't so far from telling the truth. "Some people: short, bald, big unsymmetrical faces will never make it to the point of smashing even 5's." If you mean what such guys could never fuck anyone then this is pure BS. Even 3/10 guy could fuck 8/10 woman, it depends on circumstances and a lot of different factors. Looks are just one of the factors and this is less detrimental to men than to women. M…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/18 02:36 PM
0

"Honestly, there are two ratings people should get: Zeros and ones. Are you interested in this chick? Great. She's a one. Everything else doesn't really matter. You don't want to fuck this girl? She's a zero. " This doesn't really work in this way. Some girls are like "well, I'll fuck her if there is no one better", others are "oh, she is somehow cute, I want to fuck her" and some girls are "wow, how someone could be so hot?". So at least there should be 0, 1, 2, 3 scale. Also I disagree about y…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/18 02:22 PM
0

Man couldn't be a whore. Man could be player, but not whore. And also there is nothing wrong with whores, just the fact what you shouldn't commit to them. And OP despise girls not for the fact what they love sex, reread the post. There is nothing wrong with guy fucking as many girls as he wants - it doesn't affect his ability to commit. In relationships main commitment of woman is exclusive sex only for her partner. And commitment of a man is his resources and his protection. Whore alternative o…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/18 02:14 PM
7

I really don't understand your standpoint because for me it is enough to stroll for 20 minutes on the main street of my city to find 10-20 of 7-9/10 girls. Maybe this is because I live in Russia? But most likely you just have strange standards. From what I see among young 16-22 years old girls only about 25-35% are ugly or too fat and others are more or less cute.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/18 06:07 AM
1

You haven't read top rated posts of this sub? There was at least 3 such stories with detailed guides.
/r/seduction14/06/18 06:33 PM
1

Both works.
/r/seduction13/06/18 04:06 PM
1

Both ways works. That research have nothing to do with PUA. If average dude with zero game don't do anything to make girl know what he likes her then she wouldn't even see him in sexual way and so he wouldn't have a chance (unless she will see his "social proof"). Being aloof and hiding your intent works when you know how to make her chase you and see you in sexual way. Obviously no one of participants new how to do that. For guys with zero game showing intent is the only way.
/r/seduction13/06/18 04:04 PM
1

Women lose their value when becoming older and men gain their value with time. By default 30 years old guy much more attractive than 20 years old. You haven't even reached your male prime age.
/r/seduction13/06/18 03:59 PM
1

One don't exclude other. You can have meaningful relationships with one girl and easy sex with others.
/r/seduction08/06/18 05:36 PM
3

As there is no any proper backstory to this, I can't see any "being used" here. I can't see a reason to decline sex with sexually attractive woman. Woman can't "humiliate" you unless you allow her. WTF you guys take everything girls says seriously? Shit like "you are not my type" is just a shit tests which means nothing, unless you become like "ok :((( I'm so sad what you don't like me :((". From what I see guy just get his ego hurt and then retaliated like a kid and now thinks he is "proud and …
/r/seduction08/06/18 05:34 PM
11

"Put 100 women on an island with 1 man, depending how much viagra is on hand, could impregnate them all in a couple days." Just a little of real science: actually it would take him about ten years to impregnate them all even with viagra and everyday sex-feast. First of all amount of sperm is limited as well as speed of it's replenishing. Second - there is no 100% of pregnancy even if you cum inside woman, actually its probability is about 10-20% in "dangerous day" and less than 1% in "ordinary d…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/18 05:22 PM
1

Bullshit - try to get erection by watching porn with fat cow (maybe you and those guys can, but for me this is impossible). I personally can't consider ugly/too fat women as women same way as I can't consider as "women" 60+ years old grandma or 8 years old little girl. As about your later statement - no, I don't have such feelings after the sex. Because I'm enjoying process more than accomplishment from fucking a woman. For most guys sex or masturbation isn't process they could enjoy for hours a…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/18 07:03 PM
1

If her daughter is older than 16-18 and hot then you can get threesome.
/r/seduction01/06/18 06:20 PM
1

And most of them are sexually frustrated because their hubby get tired from having sex with them and they have it like 1 time in 1-3 months. Those women who care about their bf or husbands are minority so often you wouldn't know if she have one before fucking her few times, unless you would be stupid enough to ask it yourself.
/r/seduction01/06/18 06:18 PM
1

I don't think this is actually so related to porn, because it is estimated what more than 90% of young men watch porn and most of them don't have those problems. Usually you just find yourself a girlfriend and then you no longer watch porn as often if at all this is how this "addiction" ends up for most guys. And I'm almost sure that those people who close to you jerk off on porn as well, this isn't unique in any way, any guy done it at least few hundreds times, most likely tens thousands. Maybe…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/18 06:07 PM
1

If you are not sure if they want you then always assume that they are.
/r/seduction25/05/18 01:53 PM
1

Because for man to get laid you also need a personality. Just looks are not enough to get laid. They can give you more opportunities but it doesn't matter if you can't take them.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/18 05:54 PM
1

You probably just haven't met any woman with decent skill. Most of them never even try to become better in sex, because "why I should do that?". If girl knows how to do deepthroat right and trained her vaginal muscles then she could make any guy cum in few minutes if she tries.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/18 05:41 PM
1

There is a lot of info online how to last longer and how to make dick bigger. There is a section for that in goodlookingloser. Also it is not because of porn addiction, because if you could masturbate for 1-2 hours then in most cases you could fuck girl even longer. The problem with porn is what most men just jerk off fast without trying to enjoy process and do this as 5 minutes routine.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/18 05:36 PM
6

I really don't understand how you could have a boner on ugly fat girl without pills or crazy dose of alcohol. But I have seen fat-lover guys online - they prefer fat girls and slim ones don't exist for them, lol.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/18 05:32 PM
1

Sex is a skill too. Your skill in masturbation is developed probably by tens thousands of hours. And you expect your first sex would be better? Moreover. Most people of both sex don't even try to become good in sex (lol). You can use simple exercises to make your dick bigger by about 15-20% (yes, this shit real), other set of exercises to make you last as long as you want and you can start learning how to fuck girl in dominant way and she will accept it and would be willing even to play role of …
/r/seduction24/05/18 05:17 PM
1

I talked about products which were pirated, not about free products which are misleading by default because RSD don't want people get success without paying anything.
/r/seduction24/05/18 05:07 PM
2

There is no reason to praise something you didn't tested. How much girls you fucked using his theory? If less than ten then all of this bs. Most guys would have a problem just to approach a girls. So such guy wouldn't be able to do even first step, lol. And if you have enough confidence to approach the girl then you should open with something less beta. Also most of field videos are either hired girls (which is the case for Tom), or compilation of best approaches. Any shit will eventually work w…
/r/TheRedPill23/05/18 10:54 AM
2

With numbers you mentioned it is just not worth it. 6 hours per week (going and do uncomfortable to most people things and getting rejected over and over again, possibly damaging your self-esteem) just to get 1-2 dates? Don't forget what not all dates lead to sex or relationships. If could be better to use Tinder in case you are good looking. And yes, playing video games or reading books would be much more fun than talking to random strangers. Don't misunderstood - I'm do daygame myself, but my …
/r/TheRedPill23/05/18 10:50 AM
1

Rather than complimenting the girl you should praise her for something she DID. "I really like your sense of style." Is rather a praise than the compliment.
/r/seduction23/05/18 10:16 AM
0

Lol, already deleted. Strange. There was good point about now allowing women disrespect you even if they are not interested in you sexually. No one have right to disrespect or humiliate you.
/r/seduction23/05/18 10:15 AM
3

But you shouldn't waste your money on something what you could get for free. Almost all RSD products are free if you know how to google. And if they didn't help you when you get them for free then you at least haven't wasted the time. If course which you get for free helped you then you always can buy as a gratitude.
/r/seduction23/05/18 10:13 AM
1

Well, ok, I understand your point. I live in 400k Russian city (you could consider it rural area compared to NYC lol) so it could be different for me than for people who live in million-cities.
/r/seduction22/05/18 05:40 PM
6

I'm almost sure this guy will lose all his "success" after university times over. Getting laid by being "cool successful guy" in college or university is easy. Getting laid with your own efforts when you need to specially create circumstances to met women (because otherwise you wouldn't even have contact with them) then this is hard. I can't see any game from the OP post. Just before that he ruined all advantages he had - social circle, good looks and so on. Hardest hard of the game isn't commun…
/r/seduction22/05/18 03:55 PM
1

There is no serious diseases if you use condoms (fact), let alone babies (condom + withdrawal= zero probability, or you could use temporary vasectomy which should be simple for most residents of western countries). You talking about some blue pill bs. One of the objective of TRP is to help men to fuck a lot of women and having as much sex as we want. But I personally think there is nothing wrong with slut-girls as well - no one force you to marry one of them.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 02:54 AM
1

It is stupid to call something natural "addiction". There is no real reason to "stop sex addiction" in modern times because as long as you use condoms (in right way) sex is safe. There is no real reasons to control yourself if you want to have a sex with a lot of people. Just woman with strong libido isn't suitable for family, but it is not like she really need it. There is nothing wrong with that. Give a real reason why to "control sluttery" if you enjoying it and there is no real harm to you? …
/r/TheRedPill21/05/18 05:51 PM
0

He could try counselling but instead of becoming "a couple" just using her as a cum dump while telling her lies about their bright future and fucking other girls. But most guys probably couldn't do that because of their emotions.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/18 05:37 PM
2

It is easy to not give a fuck about cheating if you just plate girl and use her for sex only. Though in this case it wouldn't be actual cheating. Is there a reason to stop fucking hot girl just because she isn't exclusive? If she is always ready to suck your cock and don't waste your free time and resources then she could do whatever she wants.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/18 05:36 PM
5

This is false about 1/6, if you google you'll find researches and 1/10 is highest rate of "child scam" which is actual for third world countries and in more developed countries it is 1/20 or less. But it just means what here women are more intelligent and use contraception. Though most of those researches are old and know things could be different and with feminazism it is unlikely we will see real numbers in near future.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/18 05:32 PM
4

The fact what you look down on Beatles shirts wouldn't prevent you from sleeping with or dating otherwise great guy. And after being with him in relationships for some time you could start to like (or even imitate) his hobbies as well.
/r/seduction15/05/18 10:49 AM
5

You actually could find women who care about your hobbies and love them by default. Moreover - most women start to imitate interests of their lover after some time in the relationships, in case you are very high value for her. Both guys and girls often copy interests of people they like and respect. If someone talks shit about your hobbies then in most cases it means they just don't respect you enough and/or don't know your boundaries.
/r/seduction15/05/18 10:48 AM
3

There is no real reason to talk about your hobbies before having sex with girl. And after the sex girl wouldn't give a fuck about it in case your hobby is not her cup of tea. But there would be girls who have similar hobbies and they are great for LTR.
/r/seduction15/05/18 10:45 AM
3

There is no high reward for bringing up sex in conversation. You should escalate physically, be playful and so on, but there is no necessity to talk about sex, in most cases this is as retarded as a talk about "do you like me? if you like me we should start dating, how do you think?!!!" before even having sex or kiss her. Sex is something you should DO, not talk about. And this is attraction+kino escalation what leads to sex, not conversations about it. If you want talk about it then you should …
/r/seduction15/05/18 10:41 AM
1

All this relationship and "get to know each other" is done after the sex. Highest chances to become close on physical level is within 2-3 hours of interaction (no matter if it is within one meeting or more i.e. there is no big difference between one meeting which lasts 2 hours or two meetings each of which lasts for 1 hour). Also - I'm not going to bars, or clubs and instead either use online or daygame. I don't like drunk people or drunk myself, I don't like music in clubs and I'm sure don't li…
/r/seduction14/05/18 10:43 AM
1

How the fuck she could know beforehand if you are high value man or not in first few minutes of conversation? This is why shit test exist. Girl don't know either you are high value or low. And if you limit yourself only to women who "would be happy go with you" from first few minutes without even knowing you then you'll lose a lot. Usually such guys also tell such bs as "looks are everything". Of course if you forcing girls to choose in first few minutes then she can judge only by your looks bec…
/r/seduction14/05/18 10:35 AM
2

Game is about how to fuck woman you know for 2-3 hours at most - so it doesn't matter what you to do in your free time because she wouldn't know it - psychic ability doesn't exist. All that is left is the game and looks. And sure, at beginner level looks matter a lot. But as you said yourself you don't have to be ripped - it is enough to be above average. Looks working more like filter than choosing criteria. If you are way out of shape then girl can filter you without even trying to know you be…
/r/seduction13/05/18 06:33 PM
1

It is true only for beginner level. Starting from intermediary it DOES replace good looking face.
/r/seduction13/05/18 02:14 PM
1

He should change the way he views the world and interactions with girls. Moreover there is no knowledge which can help to go out and become successful from your first try.
/r/seduction13/05/18 02:11 PM
4

"Most people that hop on here are NOT who they want to attract, and so will have a hard time doing exactly that no matter what lines they use. " Emm, I'm very sceptical about your assumption. Most guys just want to fuck beautiful girls - even if those girls have boring life and "meh" personality. And to become more or less beautiful girl you need either luck or 1-3 years in gym (unless her face is below average to the point it couldn't be compensated with cosmetic which is very rare). But 1-3 ye…
/r/seduction13/05/18 02:03 PM
1

It depends on who you are. Usually before really screening her out it is better to make her understand what you wouldn't play in her games, have your own rules and have some standards. Then give her another chance and if she wouldn't use it then screen her out. After all she isn't a psych and she couldn't know beforehand if you are confident guy with standards and whatever or just frustrated loser longing for some pussy.
/r/seduction13/05/18 01:48 PM
1

"The thing is if you look around the animal kingdom, it's usually the case that the males try to convince the females of how awesome they ( the males ) are and why the females should pick THEM to mate with. " This is not the case for homo-sapiens because our species have a long period of child caring. So woman should work to attract someone enough to take care of children. Moreover if look in the history of humanity then you'll found out what women mostly were on the level of fuck toys and troph…
/r/seduction13/05/18 01:36 PM
1

He asked because if you don't have valuable results then your advices don't have real value as well. Any average guy can find himself a girlfriend if he tries long enough. And quantity is more objective factor and there are no doubts about the fact what quantity also leads to rise in quality.
/r/seduction13/05/18 01:31 PM
4

People are not equal. And moreover you couldn't view others as equals to you if you understand one thing. All your subjective world is created by your brain and if you die then all your world disappear together with you. And if millions of strangers from some foreign country die then your life wouldn't change in any significant way. Moreover there are social value and some people have it higher and other people lower. Girl can assume what she has higher social value and act like this, but she wo…
/r/seduction13/05/18 01:25 PM
3

You have a major fallacy in your post. " A hundred women. A thousand women. But what is a thousand women as a percentage of all the available women in the world. It’s zero (i.e. 1000 women divided by ALL women rounds to 0%). So do you need to develop a game that works on every women? No, you need to develop a game that basically works on 0% of the available population of women. " It doesn't matter how many women available in the world, it does matter how many women are available for interaction …
/r/seduction12/05/18 06:21 PM
1

There is big difference between "centering your life around women" and "make conscious efforts to become better with women". There are a lot of people who have success in life, but either struggle with women or just don't have as much a choice as they want to. Sure, if you are more successful in life overall than 95% AND have broad social circle then you could have a choice among some women. But you'll never have as much a choice as a guy who specifically learned the game. Guy without looks or m…
/r/seduction12/05/18 05:50 PM
2

Obviously. This is what happens when someone of low value can influence someone of much higher value.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/18 07:22 PM
-11

Mm, no. You gotten this things not by reading Manson, but by working your ass off for more than a year. Moreover you have done it motivated by your extreme neediness for getting laid (your "Most importantly, I have slept with an average of 1-2 women a month this year." is proving it") . You even changed your personal preferences to be more liked by women. This is not a big deal to fuck 1-2 new woman a month if you have basic social skills, not terrible looking and going to clubs more than once a…
/r/seduction05/05/18 08:03 PM
1

If you want to date random girl just because of her looks then you should make yourself more selective. It is fine to have low standards for casual sex, but you should have some standards for relationships. And to know if she is suitable you should get to know first for some time.
/r/seduction03/05/18 03:00 PM
3

There is nothing wrong with judging looks of the girls with numbers. You can acknowledge her beauty without putting her on pedestal - it is hardly related to numerical system.
/r/seduction03/05/18 02:48 PM
1

Mm, yes. This reddit is full of such stories. In most cases it would be enough to lift for 1-2 years and to hold right frame. If you start to go in night clubs/bars and do cold approach then you'll get laid even more. Most guys who don't get laid at all just do nothing about it. No matter how good you are you wouldn't get any girls if you don't talk to them, lol. Often all you need is to start talking to new girls.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/18 11:59 AM
1

Evolution is blind - it doesn't work in a way "all for survival/reproduction" it is work in a way "just do things randomly (mostly) and what survived (+reproduced) that survived (+reproduced)". What I tried to say isn't what those different ways of having enjoyment is equal. What I said is what there isn't so big difference in subjective happiness between a person who lives ordinary life and then gets "bonus" enjoyment from easy sources and a person who lives successful life and gets similar lev…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/18 04:12 AM
1

But there is one thing you missing. Why the people want to become successful at all? Because long term success will produce exactly same hormones which is produced by instant validation. There is no real "addiction" part in all of this - we are bio-machines from the start and we wouldn't do anything what isn't programmed in us biologically in some way or other. And why being successful is better than to get all the same things easier way? Because it will make you higher in social pyramid that is…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/18 01:52 PM
5

It is really depends on the country. In Russia where I living amount of guys with muscles is high - almost 1/3 guys here either lift or learn martial arts in some form, or just train their body with regular workouts. But in western countries where a lot of guys don't do any physical activity at all and women are more interested in looks (because of social conditioning mostly) I understand why it could be so effective.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/18 10:38 AM
1

Biologically main sexual strategy of alpha is fucking a lot of different girls and then leave parental care to betas. So by definition this is actually alpha behaviour. And this is most efficient reproductive strategy - you can have unlimited amount of your kids (i.e. genes) without using your precious resources. And moreover you also can help raising your own kids from your favourite woman at the same time. Of course now with complex social structure and DNA-testes there are a lot of downsides …
/r/TheRedPill01/05/18 10:30 AM
0

If anyone can have your respect then this respect is worth nothing.
/r/seduction26/04/18 05:07 PM
1

It depends on circumstances. In club or in day game Chad Thundercock would be lucky to get 1 girl out of 10.
/r/seduction25/04/18 12:39 PM
1

Fucking random girls in bars/clubs and fucking random girls from day game is completely different matters. Girls from day game often tend to offer relationships to you and it would be much rarer to have just one night stay sex.
/r/seduction25/04/18 12:36 PM
1

Advices given here will give you girls who want to become your girlfriends after sex and will ask you to become their BF. This is a girls who should initiate relationships talk.
/r/seduction25/04/18 12:33 PM
1

Actually everyday shower is harmful for skin and not recommended by medics.
/r/seduction25/04/18 12:31 PM
1

Instead of getting her back you'd better become a man who can choose among tens of women same or higher quality.
/r/seduction25/04/18 12:30 PM
3

You shouldn't respect anyone just because they are man or woman - real respect should be earned. Treating random woman with more respect than you give to your friends or even to yourself - this is the real problem.
/r/seduction25/04/18 12:29 PM
1

There are guys for whom only hobbies is video games and anime and they still wouldn't have any problems to find a girlfriend (probably not the girl he dreams about). Most people, like 80-90% (including the girls) don't have any significant hobbies in their life. Other than social circle and basic communication skills you don't need anything to find yourself a girlfriend even while being standard blue pill provider. But to have a choice among a lot of girls you really like - this takes efforts. M…
/r/seduction25/04/18 12:24 PM
1

I know guys who are happy being single while masturbating on porn - who cares about control and choices if you still get what you want. :D "Yeah, must be real rough having girlfriends and shit all the time bro, serial dating and shit. Life's hard as a pimp you know?" Life is hard for millionaire, it is much easier to be poor - no money no problems.
/r/seduction25/04/18 12:19 PM
1

This is total bullshit - all of this wouldn't help you to approach stranger in uncomfortable situation. And even with all this done you still will be rejected in 90% cases by random girls, even if you looking much hotter than them. This is just how it is. And I even can say you what in cold approach even hot girl would be rejected by most guys, lol. There was recently post from the girl who approached guys (and still get "rejected" mostly) and she was more or less cute.
/r/seduction22/04/18 05:44 PM
1

But rejection wouldn't disappear no matter how much you learn and no matter how better you become - because it mostly doesn't depends on you and have nothing to do with you. Initial rejection isn't rejection of "you" because she knows almost nothing about you (other than your looks, which isn't enough for girls to make decision unless you are really not in her taste or too ugly) and if you didn't acted retarded then a reason for rejection is completely on her side.
/r/seduction22/04/18 05:42 PM
2

Most guys fail with chicks who liked them initially.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/18 05:58 AM
1

Lol, what? 100 girls in 3 years is a bogus results? Ok, mister pickup-guru.
/r/seduction22/04/18 05:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter