TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hardwarequestions Archive

View 136 posts and 5,396 comments by hardwarequestions on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
675

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:24 PM
339

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:31 PM
251

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:51 AM
160

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:33 PM
107

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:30 AM
88

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights04/04/12 05:46 AM
70

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights20/02/13 12:50 AM
62

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:16 PM
54

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights02/02/13 10:37 PM
48

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:03 PM
41

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:50 AM
38

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights23/08/12 03:25 PM
37

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:10 AM
35

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights04/05/13 07:49 PM
34

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights24/03/13 07:58 PM
33

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights04/07/12 04:30 AM
32

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:14 AM
31

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:29 PM
30

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights27/02/12 02:08 AM
29

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:46 AM
28

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights30/04/12 08:33 PM
26

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights21/10/11 09:29 PM
25

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights23/02/13 02:47 AM
24

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights27/05/12 08:05 PM
23

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights04/07/12 10:42 PM
22

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:07 PM
21

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:32 PM
20

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:19 AM
19

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:03 PM
19

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:39 PM
19

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights21/05/12 11:35 PM
17

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights11/05/12 12:58 PM
17

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:51 PM
17

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights09/11/12 01:48 AM
16

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights17/04/12 09:30 PM
16

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights02/12/11 03:29 AM
15

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:55 PM
14

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights22/01/12 10:25 PM
14

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights20/03/12 10:23 PM
14

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:22 AM
13

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights20/05/12 04:55 PM
12

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:48 AM
12

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights07/09/11 03:57 AM
11

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights20/02/12 07:24 AM
11

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights07/11/12 08:22 PM
11

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights26/05/12 11:40 PM
11

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights12/04/12 04:52 PM
11

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights08/07/12 09:55 PM
11

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights01/03/12 10:54 PM
10

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:41 AM
10

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights19/03/12 06:26 AM
9

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights06/02/12 09:18 PM
9

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights10/08/12 02:29 PM
9

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights09/04/12 07:43 PM
9

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights02/01/12 01:34 AM
9

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:07 AM
9

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:28 PM
9

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:03 AM
9

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights24/10/11 07:40 AM
8

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights22/10/11 10:20 PM
8

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:56 PM
8

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights19/03/12 06:21 PM
8

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights31/10/11 11:02 PM
8

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights14/03/12 03:49 PM
8

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights26/02/12 09:57 AM
8

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights22/01/13 03:07 AM
7

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights11/07/12 04:52 PM
7

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights18/02/13 12:00 AM
7

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights31/08/11 06:33 PM
7

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:30 AM
7

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:51 AM
7

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:02 AM
6

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:02 AM
6

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights03/12/11 08:14 AM
5

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights15/07/12 08:01 PM
5

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:34 PM
5

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights17/11/11 06:26 AM
4

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights15/08/12 05:44 AM
4

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights31/05/12 02:22 AM
4

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:21 AM
4

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights25/05/12 12:22 AM
3

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights14/04/12 01:55 AM
3

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:19 PM
3

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:51 AM
3

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights26/01/12 04:47 AM
3

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:28 PM
3

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights25/05/12 05:35 PM
3

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights05/10/11 01:36 AM
3

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights17/06/12 10:31 PM
3

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights04/10/11 04:48 AM
3

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights16/02/12 01:33 AM
2

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights20/06/12 05:57 AM
2

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights22/10/11 06:16 AM
2

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:44 PM
2

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights11/05/12 11:49 AM
2

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights27/07/11 05:32 PM
2

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:07 AM
2

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights10/05/12 11:04 PM
2

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights18/06/12 09:43 AM
2

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:48 AM
2

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights02/03/12 01:02 AM
2

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:51 PM
1

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights11/04/12 04:25 AM
1

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights25/04/12 12:10 AM
1

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights05/06/12 03:51 AM
1

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights02/11/11 11:14 PM
1

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights28/12/11 11:07 PM
1

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:51 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights10/10/12 12:41 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:22 PM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights28/06/12 10:29 PM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights03/07/12 02:07 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights03/08/11 12:30 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights07/07/12 06:34 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights22/09/11 05:48 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:24 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:45 PM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:51 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights05/03/13 05:52 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights26/01/12 12:16 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights08/03/12 03:05 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:05 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights23/03/12 04:48 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights03/10/12 10:13 PM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights05/07/12 09:38 PM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights22/06/12 03:23 PM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:04 PM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights03/10/12 03:59 PM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights31/10/11 05:27 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:40 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:13 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights11/04/12 04:20 PM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights09/11/11 07:25 PM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights10/03/13 09:27 AM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights28/05/12 06:21 PM
0

hardwarequestions/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:32 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 5,396 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The word is nigger. Actually refraining from typing it when discussing the word is just stupid.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 06:03 AM
22

Ya gotta step away for a bit mate.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:38 AM
1

trust me, we're not the ones crucifying. that'd be the radfems jumping down the throats of trained professionals who found this case to have no merit.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:49 AM
38

You seem to be confused...the presumption goes to innocence of the accused, not to their guilt. By consequence, yes, we are to presume she is incorrect regarding her accusation until she can prove she's correct.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 11:04 PM
44

Yeah he's gotta step back and regain some balance. This stuff can easily infuriate, but that's not healthy to succumb to.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 01:25 AM
7

Don't most here think something like that is a reasonable component of any legal parental surrender law?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 11:50 AM
9

I think the crazies are running the crazyhouse.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 04:16 AM
1

And why does this video channel have so many subscribers? Angsty teens on youtube?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 07:53 AM
3

Oddly enough, historically they were distinguished from other whites in fact. They weren't considered white enough to be grouped with the English/French/etc. We humans are a weird bunch.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 05:17 PM
0

You realize many of us don't consider a fetus to be a human, right?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 03:56 AM
2

Please, tell me more of your feelings on methods of debate and education.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 02:35 AM
5

what is this, a rationalization for ants?
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:00 AM
14

Seriously, guy applies hypocrisy before the fifth sentence. What an amateur.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:40 AM
1

Sounds appropriate to me.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 11:46 PM
0

Hindsight in all honesty. I suspect they're just trying to justify their expertise. A deliberation of that length could mean any number of things and we just can't know until the verdict comes down.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 09:41 PM
10

I really hope so. Her actions just scream "unstable".
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:58 PM
3

True. And I've definitely heard of longer deliberation periods.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:58 PM
4

Correct.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:57 PM
2

They certainly deliberated for a bit though.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:55 PM
8

Welcome to the MRM.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 06:19 AM
3

*faked.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 03:27 AM
7

See, you make an interesting point there, but then you go and link this post to /againstmensrights. Why? Why call in the brigading circlejerk who you know takes things to the extreme when you yourself can just join the conversation and contribute so well?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 03:03 AM
2

Interesting notion. Can't say I agree, but can you expand on why? I'm curious what your line of thinking there is.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 01:39 AM
7

You think manhood requires being heterosexual?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 12:59 AM
1

did you mean to link to something?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 12:40 AM
12

it's really not accurate to consider me a lefty. and ok, you need elaboration...understandable. i'd highlight two points against your assertion: 1) you seem to be referencing flamboyant types. well, they don't speak for the entire gay community. just because twinks and your average Pride Parade walker seems to reject masculinity doesn't mean all gay people do. 2) to support that, you should really familiarize yourself with Bears. these are the kind of gay men that regular straight guys hoping to…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 12:30 AM
3

in case you don't want to give them pageviews... http://i.imgur.com/Mo2jSw0.jpg
/r/MensRights08/05/13 12:24 AM
13

Dude...no.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 10:22 PM
2

My pleasure. Sorry to hear about your previous experience. I can't deny emotions can run high when discussing this stuff, but I do believe most here are receptive to anyone with a genuine question.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 09:27 PM
1

Hmm you're sure? We have a fairly relaxed policy on banning here...even repetitive trolls don't get banned for just trolling.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 09:25 PM
0

Give the baby up so I can pay him child support? Oh, that's rich. if only Legal Parental Surrender was a thing, that wouldn't be an issue. in any case, if adoption is out of the question, that still leaves her the option of giving it up for adoption or legally abandoning it. If you're so blinded by other things as to ignore other concerns just because they don't't fit your little agenda, well, I guess there isn't much else to say. i'm no more blinded than you are. your interests run in one direc…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 08:15 PM
-1

i support that ideal, but doubt any serious efforts to that end will happen anytime soon.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:47 PM
0

you realize even prominent /amr folks are free to post submissions here, right? i'll answer best i can, but if you're truly curious, just ask the sub as a whole. Do the majority of people in the MRM honestly believe that America is a matriarchy no, not really. i'm sure you've seen the repeated rejection of the idea that we live in a patriarchy in this sub, but understand that we can live in a system that is neither, or somewhere between the two. what a majority in the MRM likely believe, though,…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:45 PM
-2

just following the example set by /amr.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:30 PM
-2

/MR members comment when they disagree. that post has a blatantly abnormal amount of votes for so few commentors. seriously, own up to your brigades. not a big deal.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:27 PM
-6

how'd he harm the child? he does go to jail. then he gets out. life resumes, including that of parenthood. get over your inhumanity.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:21 PM
-1

that's correct, but as that is the current reality, a law like this fails to take that into consideration and ends up being too broad in it's reach. as it stands, the law is entirely unacceptable. If someone raped my wife and she had a child, I sure as hell wouldn't want that asshole coming to my house for visits. Would you? hard for me to say, as i'm blinded by all the other issues involved with that scenario...why'd she not abort it? why not give it up for adoption or let the rapist have full …
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:19 PM
-4

We take rights away from people all the time. Liberty is a right, yet we imprison people. for actions with direct results. people get imprisoned because they're deemed to dangerous to be allowed in public. Gun possession is a right, yet we take that away from all ex cons. something i'm also against. now you want to limit people and restrict them from things they've never harmed. that's a gross leap from everything we've established so far in history.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:09 PM
-5

fair enough.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:06 PM
1

Your equating a drunken one night stand with a person who forcefully, without consent, raped another person. There's a big difference. not in the eyes of the law. they're one in the same and this law would apply to both. Just because 2 people made some bad choices because they were drunk and now one of them has a little regret is not the same thing as drugging or physically forcing the other to have sex with them. it shouldn't be, but we both know people (mostly men) have been convicted of rape …
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:51 PM
-4

What about the rights of the convicted rapist? Get over it. i'm glad you're so comfortable with ignoring inherent rights. What about the rights of the mother? those being? What about the best interests of the child? in cases where it can be demonstrated that a rapist is still dangerous, fine. duh. but assuming one is still dangerous is just wrong. The rapist is only person in this scenario who is not a victim, so keep playing your violin for those poor rapists out there. the kid isn't a victim, …
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:49 PM
0

calm down. if you can't discuss something with a person who holds an opposite view, then just stop discussing. yeah, that's my perspective, and it has the weight of natural law behind it. parental rights are not something to shuck lightly. declaring any rapist is incapable of being a good parent because of that single rape is incredibly shortsighted. understand that your position would strip someone of being a parent for nothing more than a drunken one night stand. really, think hard about that.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:45 PM
1

You mean, how abortion rights are curtailed in so many states in the US, more and more, abortion being a a core feminist issue? Or? yeah...because a large portion of the populace thinks abortion is murder. what's your point?
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:41 PM
1

Mind detailing those means? they gained voting rights before blacks and most other groups because of a receptive congress granting it to them. they maintain large lobbying groups across the country for pushing their vision onto legislators. they've gotten countless laws put on the books that focus only on women (VAWA and the Healthcare Affordability Act being their two shining examples). they use the power of police departments to enforce Duluth Model responses to domestic violence situations th…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:40 PM
0

well, this law applies to rapists who have completed their sentencing, so i'm pointing out how it and your position are wrong.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:25 PM
-8

except what you're referencing is not privacy. seriously are you a 1L at Cooley or something? because your legal understanding is so far expanded beyond the existing perimeters that i don't even know what to think.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:24 PM
0

yeah...and you get them back upon release and completion of your sentence.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:21 PM
2

i think even most here would agree someone actively harming their kid could stand to lose their parental rights.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:20 PM
-11

Yes, I can justify it. He raped the mother (yes, using gender, deal with it). The mother should not have to ever see or deal with the rapist again. that's not justification, it's your reasoning. You have conflicting rights: the rights of a victim not to be continually subjected to facing their rapist that's not a right though. such a measure is found no where in our legal system. and the rights of a rapist to be in the life of the child they created by raping someone. that IS a right. it's one o…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:12 PM
-12

The rapist never should have rights over a child that was the product of rape. Period. Again, more refusal to consider the possibility of reform. I find that disgusting and inhumane. You can't even justify such a position. Additionally, a rapist should be held responsible for the child they forced upon the mother. And there's the disconnect again. All responsibilities, but no rights. There's no moral justification for that. Excuse me for using the gender identifiers that attach to the vast major…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:44 AM
1

You should really post this to /r/srssucks and /r/sjsucks as it is. Nice writeup. But remove the .np portion.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:29 AM
-14

First, if someone rapes a woman, and a child is produced, the rapist has no rights in regards to that child. That ship has sailed But that right there is my point...that position requires one to inherently not believe in nor offer the chance for reform, and I cannot accept that. The issue is even further compounded if you're willing to hold that position while simultaneously expecting this the rapist to pay child support. Fuck that disconnection of rights and responsibilities. Also, don't gender…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:23 AM
-10

And how do you propose that?
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:45 AM
-17

Yeah...that's not rape apologizing. Holding society to a standard that accepts the possibility of reform is just being sensible.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:38 AM
2

Random question...is that sub even the right place to ask that? Does anyone know where It's user base stands on MRA issues? EDIT: wow, still not sure on the postion of that sub relative to MRA issues, but I can say that is a thread full of fantastic responses.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:51 AM
2

Let me ask...if feminism improved as a movement, would you reconsider being anti-feminist?
/r/MensRights06/05/13 11:25 PM
1

I think you'd enjoy /INeedFeminismBecause
/r/MensRights06/05/13 07:01 PM
0

ME! haha. just consider all the means that feminism retains power...they're all through legal or legislative avenues. no State would mean none of those would exist, and feminism would be nothing in turn.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:38 PM
1

can't say. i don't ever see the MRM and feminism uniting under one of the existing names, but that's about all i'm sure of. maybe a unity of sorts under a new name altogether. or an eventual cooperation. maybe.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 03:52 AM
0

people follow /POLITIC?
/r/MensRights06/05/13 03:44 AM
3

in theory, it is, but in action it is much more narrow-minded and closed off to such things. i like to think it's the fault of those in charge these days, and not the movement itself...i have more hope for the movement turning to a more inclusive position someday then most others do.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 03:43 AM
1

i doubt your sincerity.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 03:39 AM
1

you're very stupid and new around here it seems. ask most users...i'm pretty well known for straddling the fence between feminism and the MRM. you're just an extremist. non-enthusiastic consent doesn't equate to non-consent. deal with it.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 03:34 AM
5

feminists aren't really addressing men's isssues, so people are stepping up and attempting to do so. i would have preferred this to happen without any labels or division of groups, but that's just not how it played out. feminists in power rejected anyone who suggested they expand their efforts to men and basically forced them out and into their own group...BOOM...the MRM was born.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 03:32 AM
10

feminism never would have arisen without state-backing and support.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 03:25 AM
1

yes, it is. glad you finally understand reality now. of course, you're also presenting a false dichotomy suggesting only those two variances are possible.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 03:10 AM
1

That's not what were discussing. You think there's no debate needed regarding the legal standing of enthusiastic consent. That's simply wrong.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 01:42 AM
1

Then you're just overly biased.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 01:24 AM
3

What's an example of when an insult is necessary?
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:11 AM
3

To yourself perhaps, not necessarily to others and general society.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:04 AM
3

I do. Often someone's justification relies on their insistence that a necessity for their action exists.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:45 AM
2

Yeah...that's not a settled point at all. It's obvious which side you take, and that's cool, but don't pretend your opponents don't have a point.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:43 AM
10

Definitely catch his part 1 video mate. That one was more focused on her actual points and assertions. This one and future videos are meant to deconstruct and critique her as an individual and commentator. Supposedly, he'll eventually expand to people like Anita in general.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:41 AM
3

But necessity goes hand in hand with justification.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:35 AM
3

Nah, pretty sure an insult is never necessary. Just desired.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:29 AM
3

That makes no sense. An insult, by definition, is something unnecessary. What is unnecessary is typically dissociated from justification in the first place.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:12 AM
3

i think at-the-bottom has officially jumped the shark. they're either a completely indoctrinated moron or a troll.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 06:39 AM
3

i don't need justification to use a pejorative. fine. pussy/dick/cunt/cock/wiener are off the table for using as insults.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 06:36 AM
3

but where do you draw the line between what's gender based and what's anatomically based? besides, most people use these insults (dick/pussy/cunt/asshole/cock) when going after someone for something other than their gender...they're just the readily available words most folks think of.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:54 AM
3

so let's not compare the two, and either ask folks not to use either, or accept the usage of both. personally...i go for using both.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:44 AM
5

you're projecting a whole lot of confidence privilege right now. please check it and respect the struggles of those less comfortable with verbalizing their inner thoughts.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:42 AM
2

but change for change's sake is not any sort of justification. and the existing justification for codifying enthusiastic consent as the new standard is hardly enough given the problems it raises and the, in all honesty, lacking need it attempts to address.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:38 AM
3

and calling someone a cunt means other things outside of the US too, not all of them derogatory. i really don't feel like playing olympics on this one mate, it's a stupid venture entirely. i'm pointing out the hypocrisy, nothing more. now quit being a penis.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:34 AM
2

Calling someone by their name Dick isn't the same as calling someone a dick, or dickweasel. Fair?
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:15 AM
2

Hit the reply button under the comment.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:07 AM
2

Context and usage dummy. They matter.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:04 AM
1

Ahh yeah it's probably just a reddit glitch. Sometimes that'll happen. I believe it has to do with a lag in the servers syncing up.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 01:08 AM
5

True point. Might have to be more creative in the future. Is what a glitch?
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:23 AM
1

Nah, it's not.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:17 AM
4

Well. Played.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:12 AM
6

You want to change how humans act in intimate situations. A pretty drastic change from how we've interacted for all of history. It just strikes me as amazingly arrogant.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:51 PM
5

You only comment in /MR threads that are being brigaded. Pussy.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:47 PM
4

It's amazing how much you want to change human interaction.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:44 PM
5

Love 'em.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:37 PM
2

How's the transition coming?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:37 PM
5

I actually agree with your general position...but DUDE! Your delivery is the worst.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:36 PM
3

I'm not convinced most people are as fearful and timid as you though.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 10:46 AM
1

Sure, I was just curious where you were taking things with that comment. I realize it was far more reasonable than I first thought. I think VoteAnimal is just mucking up the water.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 06:59 AM
1

I suspect you're right, but I just want them to clarify.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 06:32 AM
2

That statement is a bit surprising coming from you.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:05 AM
4

i am so glad you joined reddit.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 12:51 AM
4

you are very dumb.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 12:47 AM
3

Reading that sub makes me like /childfree more...and I can't stand /childfree. Nothing but a parenting circlejerm.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 10:50 PM
7

Yeah wow this VoteAnimal is a bit insane.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 10:04 PM
2

You do very good work.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 10:02 PM
7

Holding masculinity as something good...is a bad thing? Hold on a second, I need to put on my fedora-thinking-cap to get this one.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:58 PM
11

Aww, your sense of reality is so twisted you're confusing me for you. That's precious.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:36 PM
13

You really sound like an insufferable loser. Self-flagellate elsewhere please.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:19 PM
5

For funsies...elaborate.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:32 PM
2

Many here identify as both.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 11:50 AM
1

I'm not passing value judgements on him for doing that; i was just clarifying his life for another user. My views on his philosophy and economic opinions are entirely seperate. Haha, right...snippets. keep thinking anyone who disagrees with him is merely uninformed or something. I won't bother shattering your reality tonight.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:17 AM
1

Haha I read enough of Marx's economics in college to get my fill. But please, elaborate on where I'm wrong. He wasn't born into relative luxury? He didn't distance himself from his family and that class in general?
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:48 AM
2

didn't he exile himself from them though? and went on to live off the support of his friends/followers?
/r/MensRights02/05/13 11:30 PM
1

you know that's not productive.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 11:29 PM
1

most people are happy with most things, that's how it's supposed to be. it's for the small percentage that things go wrong we see just how risky some things are.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:48 AM
2

if only life were so uncomplicated and easy.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 11:05 PM
22

seems so foolish.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:25 PM
28

the wife and i also keep separate finances...it's just simpler. honestly, i don't know how folks who combine them actually do it.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:11 PM
4

feminism has had decades to work for men, and they haven't yet. sorry, but i don't believe in trickle-down equality.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 07:01 PM
5

Now now, it's definitely frustrating, but we have a duty to educate others.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 07:25 AM
4

Their defense was that shared custody is too difficult to implement as a default and it causes an unstable environment for the kid. I have a hard time believing this wasn't a known cover for their desire to maintain power and control.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 07:24 AM
2

I'm really hoping for a sequel.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 05:09 AM
2

So we're becoming too much like /TiA and /SRSSucks? Haha. Look I love all of these semi-related subs, and I too hope /MR stays less circlejerky than the others, but i don't think it's really a concern just yet. And the fact is the sub couldn't sustain on more serious posts entirely, it needs the silly posts and rant posts and such from time to time. Hell even posts like yours are needed, to keep others mindful.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 12:41 AM
2

now you're getting it.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 10:10 PM
4

i don't feel guilty for objectification...
/r/MensRights28/04/13 10:01 PM
1

hmm, not sure. might be. honestly i think more guys would get one if it didn't require the loss of sensation. but if that's already gone then hey, why not?
/r/MensRights27/04/13 10:06 PM
3

i love it when a plan comes together.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 10:05 PM
5

And scrappy! Ya like the fight.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:38 AM
8

Google penile pump implants. They're intended for men who suffer from extreme erectile dysfunction due to major trauma or illnesses, but the basic idea should work for someone in your position too. Your obstacle would be the lack of the actual penis but with what they're able to transplant, graft, or otherwise create these days...it's certainly feasible. And hell a prosthetic penis is not outside the realm of possibility either. The basic mechanism is there though...
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:35 AM
4

Nah, just means you're feisty :)
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:22 AM
11

That's actually feasible, it just won't provide any stimulation to OP. It'd be a modified version of a medical implant used by prostate/penile/testicular cancer survivors, but it could be done.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:20 AM
15

Just in case it interests you, /lgbt suffers from the very intolerance you mention, but /ainbow doesn't. It's a sub that spunoff from /lgbt when that place became too hostile.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:17 AM
3

Very few, best I can tell.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:16 AM
6

Just finishing some work mostly. Welcome to the sub.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:15 AM
7

Sup bro.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 07:34 AM
3

so...selection bias?
/r/MensRights27/04/13 05:29 AM
6

i didn't think we actually had that many PUA's here...
/r/MensRights27/04/13 04:16 AM
5

oh my god, you just made ME realize why it's ainbow...i'm gonna go sit in the corner for a few minutes.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 09:44 PM
2

how did you NOT get it? the tradition in redditrequest is the first to request it gets it. fuck.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 06:19 PM
63

/lgbt is pretty close minded. /ainbow is much more progressive.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:50 AM
3

Consider /r/INEEDFEMINISMBECAUSE.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:49 AM
6

That is one of the most absurd assertions I've seen made.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 07:16 AM
2

a wise user once said "calling it Patriarchy is like looking at a fruit bowl filled with bananas and peaches and calling it a banana bowl." as to the why? money, power, control of the narrative...all three and more. feminists would have gained less if they had admitted early on they weren't oppressed solely and above all else. hell that's why they used the word "oppressed" when it's barely an accurate label. "repressed" maybe. though i've never seen any evidence for anything beyond "disadvantage…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:51 AM
5

Go speak to the department head about her unprofessional behavior and how she's abusing her position as an authority figure.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 02:02 AM
-3

Ah good old /rape. Was a better place under its former mod team. Now...not so much.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:18 AM
2

agreed overall, but i would add that fraternities have a female equivalent...sororities. and greek institutions aren't exactly geared towards this type of thing nowadays. the call for non-greek men's groups is to offer an equivalent to non-greek female safe spaces that already exist.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:59 AM
2

you have a lot of hate inside you.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 01:49 AM
2

true, but such openly bigoted (and supported) immature idiots? that's an experience i luckily didn't have to suffer through myself.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 11:43 PM
2

sounds like you've had to deal with a lot of immature idiots at that school.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 11:33 PM
1

oversaturation, coupled with a pullback of demand, in a highly specialized field. i'm a bit beyond the affects at this point in my life, but i try to keep up on what the newly minted lawyers are dealing with...man oh man, keep your chin up.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 11:11 PM
0

How's the market been trending since? Improved for recent grads at all?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 06:38 PM
1

OP is a 1L at Florida Coastal...don't expect much unfortunately. You graduated last year?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 06:15 PM
1

Agreed, but sometimes you just have to draw your line in the sand. I'd treat a woman no differently than a smaller guy with a Napoleon complex. Just make sure to do it in front of a camera and let them strike you first. Or do something other than srike...grapple, slap, push back...hell avoid the face even.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 12:15 AM
10

Repost. Generally, we're big on treating women the same as men. Period. So, however someone would respond to a guy attacking, do the same if it was a woman. Not complicated, right?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 09:08 AM
5

don't ya know? MRA's are responsible for everything on the net. duh! really though, i would be suspicious of any such claim. for as meta-dramatic as the incident was, it seems to have not spread around as much as i had anticipated.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 11:53 PM
7

why is your wife leaving you if the child has admitted to the accusation being a lie?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 05:21 AM
1

fair point, but i feel she may have some legitimacy. if the process was fair originally, at least within line of what we consider to be fair based on our constitution and legal history, but then was made unfair by a gov't action (the Dear Colleague letter and Title 9), it would unfortunately require further gov't action to dial back that initial gov't action that made it unfair.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 12:44 AM
5

well said! that mirrors my own thoughts. i can understand some time spent on bemoaning the lateness of the revelation, but ultimately the article and sentiment should end on embracing people like this woman and overall extending appreciation for her speaking out.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 12:25 AM
1

what makes you think she's adhering to it following these events with her son? my interpretation was that she was fairly disgusted with the movement and taking steps to distance herself from it.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 12:21 AM
2

consider searching through some of our sister subs for more academic content.../r/MensRightsLinks, /r/MRRef, /r/MensRightsLaw.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 12:16 AM
2

to be fair, they didn't say they abandoned feminism or redirected their activism. they very well could have been entirely apathetic and unaware of the gender debate as a whole beforehand. OR they could even have been a feminist activist who has added MRA activism to their focus as a compliment to continued feminist activism. great question though! it gets asked periodically and always produces some amazing stories.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 12:11 AM
1

but... this link isn't /inactivism, it's a comment in /atheism. the claims of circlerjerking would fall flat. and i recall that instance. there seemed to be much more support than there was outrage. the dissenting comments sustained a lot of downvotes and disagreement even. lastly, this comment isn't just a comment...it's a well-rounded and succinet summary of the overall issue. it's probably one of the best comments on the topic i've ever seen in how comprehensive it is.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 12:08 AM
14

Someone needs to /bestof that link.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 09:03 PM
1

You youngters have no respect for the art of trolling these days.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 08:45 PM
5

for one, your use of terminology. taking a cutting utensil to female genitals is "genital mutilation", but doing the same exact thing (and yes, we need to disregard the degree of cutting here as FGM is applied to all forms) to male genitals is "circumcision". it's this type of subtle differentiation that really bugs MRA's in all honesty. and you're not even unaware of it...you try to justify it by claiming social reasons for the two things varies (as if that even MATTERED), despite the fact that…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:36 PM
7

the hair splitting...god the hair splitting! but fine. we can agree genital mutilation is bad. ain't it fucked that THAT's the extreme we have to go to to find common ground?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:58 AM
3

haha, wasn't going to mention it but i actually just got banned from there too. and for posting in the same thread. and to note, you mean /feminisms, not /feminism. my comment was pretty innocuous. some user was bashing AVfM for not doing anything to quell the drama around Red, and i linked to their post asking members not to doxx her or mess with her. so yeah, discussion ain't a big thing there apparently.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:51 AM
5

careful. certain subs are gonna conflate this with doxxing. haha.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:19 AM
1

why respond? it's their sub, not exactly the time and place for that thing.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 02:41 AM
5

i don't know, i just can't give a troll anything better than a 6 out of 10 when they use absolutely no subtlety. ya gotta finesse this kind of thing. it's 2013 for crying out loud, you're up against trolls who have been doing this for over a decade...ya gotta step up your game.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 02:40 AM
4

Not so sure it's a problem, just nice to see men getting asked some questions, and to see it covered by this particular site, which is definitely not known for being MRA-friendly.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:01 AM
19

thanks for making me feel even worse.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 04:22 AM
14

i need to learn photoshop.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 04:17 AM
21

oohh, time for a new gf. maybe.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 04:05 AM
3

good idea, but not needed for a simple gender-flipping of the wording. the point is to show that such focused attention is sexist, as most will react to the female version. or, replace all the pronouns with gender neutral ones and post those over the originals.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 03:28 AM
8

if you have time, make your own version identical to it but with the genders flipped, then post them along side the originals. also consider emailing the organization responsible for the posters with your feelings on them, and speak to your RA or whomever posted them too. also, what kind of an organization still uses an AOL email address? i think i'm more bothered by that...
/r/MensRights16/04/13 03:10 AM
2

but not an accessory to it. it's a tough distinction to make peace with, but one that must be made regardless.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 03:04 AM
52

yo dawg, i heard you like girlwriteswhat, so i put some /u/girlwriteswhat in your thread about girlwriteswhat.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:07 AM
2

Don't give it pageviews.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 08:22 AM
4

Most people respond positively. Really, only the most bigoted of feminists I know are unable to appreciate what the MRM is about.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:57 AM
4

yeah it's not the biggest distinction, but that's my read of the situation. one was someone engaged in a discussion (albeit with terrible communication skills), the other was someone protesting a discussion. that's the difference in my mind.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 03:13 AM
-1

Despite her obnoxious way of going about it, Red was at least engaging in something admirable...an open discussion. The other person was a protestor attempting to shut down an open discussion.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 02:18 AM
6

It's the list she was reading.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 08:44 PM
27

The ironic part? In the comment section a woman harps on another commentor for using the word bitch. Stop word policing ya cunts.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 06:24 AM
0

Those two aren't connected in the way you're suggesting. The existence of laws by which the physical world operates in no way negates the existence of free will. All arguments I've seen making that assertion were little more than thought-experiments made up of false assumptions and leaps in logic. It's the same kind of junk philosophy as those idiots who try to make up a lecture surrounding the notion of "that chair you're sittin on doesn't actually exist."
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:39 AM
13

Goes hand in hand with BEING such a badass.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:26 AM
1

It's a great counter argument as long as you realize the trend to deny the existence of free will is laughable bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:24 AM
2

This really deserves more upvotes.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:31 PM
0

probably not a bad idea. i don't personally think something like that is doxxing as it lacks a connection to an online identity, but sure, better safe than sorry.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 08:31 PM
63

sorry for your experience mate. shitty people exist unfortunately, but the real kicker is the lack of interest in justice by the legal system. welcome to the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 06:26 PM
4

do it!
/r/MensRights11/04/13 05:35 AM
4

ok. consider writing up a more elaborate analyses of her article and why it should be viewed as positive, then post that as a stand-alone submission here. i'll upvote it for the discussion at least.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:55 PM
18

just for funsies, what's her proof of sexism against women?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:46 PM
3

haha, feeling left out?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:18 PM
1

yep. mockery is ok when they do it, but don't you dare try to be taken seriously talking about feminism with a name that mocks something important to them. they're all just children.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:30 PM
4

have a brain and be willing to use it for critical thinking? YOU'RE A MISOGYNIST!
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:11 PM
9

that's not actually their belief, but an analogy of the poor logic being used in the linked article.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:58 PM
1

spermjack_attack has linked to your comment in /againstmensrights... http://www.reddit.com/r/againstmensrights/comments/1c29t4/my_blog_has_been_featured_on_rmensrights_d_d_d/c9cfx34
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:54 PM
5

This is the author of that blog /u/spermjack_attack. See their post of this in /feminisms.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:37 PM
2

huh?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 04:38 AM
1

i think we need a picture to settle this... haha.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 10:41 PM
5

i think i don't want to click it it and give it pageviews.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 10:37 PM
3

so we can't lose :)
/r/MensRights09/04/13 10:11 PM
1

i genuinely didn't think you were that tall. 6'1'' maybe, but never a hulking 6'4''.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 09:56 PM
3

Can we turn that into an actual sub game? Predicting jezebel articles...
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:34 AM
1

My mental picture of you was just shattered.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:29 AM
5

probably better content for /r/libertarian or /r/anarcho_capitalism. we try to get it apolitical here.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:41 AM
1

Interesting. Maybe I've just been lucky as I honestly haven't had that type of experience.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 12:49 AM
1

looks like they have nothing wrong with mocking a kid.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 11:18 PM
2

good. let them continue to water down the meaning of the word until it means literally nothing. already a large amount of people roll their eyes when anyone uses the word...one day everyone will.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 10:48 PM
2

meh. i of course disagree, but their overall position is rather favorable, at least in terms of how they present SRS. seems like their understanding of /mr is based on just a passing look. we're great at this already, but just a friendly reminder...engage in discussion, don't vote.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 10:42 PM
2

might want to post this to /r/SRSsucks instead. /mr tries to ignore anything SRS for the most part. but yeah, /SRSd had promise, but it's overly modded just like the rest of the fempire. tow the line or get banned.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 10:34 PM
5

You know that's not true. Granted, the thread itself is doing a good job of pointing out the double standard, but it's still important to highlight the double standard here. Could generate some interesting discussion.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 09:12 PM
1

God is this article reaching. Statistics and common sense are like futrelle's kryptonite it seems.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 09:02 PM
2

Preach it!
/r/MensRights07/04/13 09:53 AM
0

Holy shit! Crosspost this to /canada, /toronto, /rage, /videos, /sjsucks, and /srssucks RIGHT NOW! Too damn funny.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 08:55 AM
-1

Really? I've always had a good experience with demmian.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 10:16 PM
-1

Haha...this is why I love you.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 10:01 PM
6

I love the intersection of my AC beliefs and men's rights.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 10:00 PM
1

It's not exactly an opinion I share with him, though I think I can grasp what he was trying to get at...but I can appreciate his commentary on other topics without supporting this particular perspective.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:26 AM
1

Sorta seperate issues...he's tweeted a lot of controversial stuff lately and the earlier posts here supported his comments on an unrelated topic and tweet. Seriously, this week he's touched on child-haters, transexuals, MMA gender policies, feminists in general, MRA's...it's a scramble baby!
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:10 AM
2

So god damn glad I'm never having kids. Fucking hell. Best of luck dealing with that cunt.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:10 AM
1

Because one necessarily impacts the other?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 04:01 AM
2

ha...homophone.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 08:51 PM
5

Give me my foreskin back? And in mint condition pleaee. None of that "torn edges gives it character" crap.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:39 PM
13

That user posts in /againstmensrights.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 07:06 PM
13

the term itself? no. the tone with which that woman in the commercial used the phrase? yes.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:52 AM
9

just remind them those guys are at the pinnacle of physical possibility, that not everyone is, nor can be, like that, and that it's totally fine to not be like that. and that if they want to try to be like that they should start taking physical exercise and proper eating seriously. the younger they start the greater impact their efforts will have.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:49 AM
2

i think you're being a bit obtuse in all honesty. yeah, we're all biological, but the notions of a biological girl or biological boy go back decades already and are well established even among laymen and those unfamiliar with this issue. even transphobics understand what it means that someone is trans and that someone else is biological. furthermore, if you really want me to entertain your analogy, than i have to recognize being trans as a biological mistake that needs correcting...do you really…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:45 AM
2

you forgot the period.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 03:53 AM
3

actually, biological was the original moniker for this type of thing, and is far more popular still. plus, it's just sensible.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 03:52 AM
1

maybe no one talks to you because of that big needless chip on your shoulder.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 03:50 AM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 02:58 AM
5

God you're angry.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 02:55 AM
1

We already do care. It's a safe bet most regulars here would act the exact opposite as how most acted in that video. But those other subs are more conducive to making this stuff go viral.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 07:01 AM
6

wasn't that sub modded by folks in support of her?
/r/MensRights27/03/13 08:31 PM
2

the rejection of social justice in its current form is still young and developing; perhaps you can visit /sjsucks and help shape its progress. personally, i'm not for affirmative action for racial minorities, though eliminating it is low on my priority list compared to the other issues that exist. really, the community is more focused on combating the more extreme examples of social justice as /u/nicemod references.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 08:29 PM
3

fair point.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 03:51 AM
1

true.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 11:46 PM
6

in descending order of significance... -class privilege -race privilege -gender privilege now while i do think gender privilege swings more in favor of women than men, the truth is there are two far more significant factors that make someone privileged or not compared to others.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 11:35 PM
1

that's when you leave, head home, pack up her shit and put it on the lawn.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 11:33 PM
16

you're going about this all wrong. forget trying to defend yourself to the bigots in your class who aren't willing to prove their preconceptions and biases...it's not worth your time. you're better off complaining to your teacher's boss about their lack of objectivity and poor behavior. record your class next time and document the situation.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 11:32 PM
0

for anyone disgusted at the comments, this was linked to in /SRSMeta hours ago. it's a safe bet those are SRSers commenting on the article.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 11:29 PM
5

it's easy to want to dismiss it out of hand since it comes off as high school drama, but the truth is it may end up being a significant event...this is the first time someone who claimed to be offended was so publicly rebuffed, rather than just accepted and agreed with.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:09 PM
2

too true.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:05 PM
1

if you follow her enough, you'll eventually just pity her. it's clear she's projecting a whole host of personal issues onto others. i suspect her childhood was extremely traumatic.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:00 PM
2

eh, bigots will always exist. some just feel empowered right now. that kind of thing really attracts truly vile people too.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 07:52 PM
5

/u/TheIdesOfLight is a known extremist and bigot. she regularly displays her prejudice against white people and men. no, really. /SRSsucks catches most of her crazier comments.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 07:43 PM
6

Your perception of what constitutes sexual harassment is just as twisted as Adria's. If you're really confident in your analyses, post this to /law as well and see what their consensus is.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 04:20 PM
1

no way! come on i honestly thought she was in her 30's. her linkedin profile shows she was getting industry experience over a decade ago that i wouldn't expect a young teenager to be doing.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:12 PM
1

wait, how old is she supposed to be?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 05:51 PM
29

How anyone can be so disturbingly hypocritical just amazes me.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 04:24 PM
1

you're really reading too much into this. the fact is everything phrase it lists, can apply to both men and women. you read gender inequity as only addressing the typical female-oriented tropes of inequity, but because it's ambiguous the same mentality can apply to male-oriented inequity. without knowing the intentions of the group behind the pamphlet, i'm not going to make assumptions in this case. and truthfully, your apparent frustration with me over not joining you in yelling "god damn femin…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 04:00 PM
0

for all we know this pamphlet was put up by a sex awareness group that has no affiliation with feminism nor it's more absurd notions. you're presuming. i understand the desire to do so, but i'd rather celebrate the innocuous when i see it.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 03:44 PM
21

really want a reaction? xpost to /rage, /videos, and /wtf. it'll take off somewhere. maybe you can spur the outrage.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 03:20 AM
1

we can't actually claim that without any further context. show me it's a group known for that kind of subterfuge and i'll readily concede, but until then i give the benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:04 AM
3

So many jump cuts!
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:44 PM
2

I think a lot of us are in a heightend attack mode following the Adria Richards debacle.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:37 PM
0

Except that most of those pamphlets do indeed specify rape of females. This one at least does better than that. And no whatever is coming wasn't, but my hope is the MRM tempers the next wave and influences it's evolution.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:33 PM
1

no, but i have hope the cooler heads within the movement will someday take back control of it.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:49 PM
35

Most of you know where I stand on this particular issue, but the truth is the MRM is way too young and unestablished to deal with infighting centered around political differences right now. Really...don't.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:01 AM
2

Yeah theverge has some real white knight issues as of late. I think they're doing it for pageviews.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:57 AM
2

come on you know i'm aware...this isn't my first dog & pony show. but there's truly a solid adherence to gender neutral language here. there's no subtle digs or suggestions whatsoever. hell there aren't even any suggestions that a belief in rape culture or any other dogmatic beliefs are necessary. free of any context that suggests this is one of the examples that are just a cover for something more insidious, i think we can offer the benefit of the doubt. i think doing so is all the more importa…
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:00 AM
3

if you marry a woman, get a vasectomy but store sperm at a nearby sperm bank where they require your signature for release of the sperm and promise to destroy it after X years, then end up divorcing the women but she goes to the sperm bank and fakes your signature and impregnates yourself...your're still on the hook for child support. short answer...yes.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:20 AM
1

really? which portion indicated the focus on raping done by men?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:01 AM
3

i wouldn't bother hitting up your lawyer for that, just call the clerk's office at the courthouse and ask them what the time limitations are. i'll admit i'm not sure if you have to actually wait till it's lowered or not, but worth finding out.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 11:35 PM
11

you know you're allowed to request a decrease in required child support based on your pending reduction in salary, right? not saying it'll be honored, but you can make the request with the court.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 11:07 PM
1

Haha, no it's not.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:22 PM
2

Not as much as I reddit :)
/r/MensRights20/03/13 06:25 PM
2

does this guy even reddit?!
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:45 PM
2

we're pretty chill on modding here, but dude! yeah read the sidebar and the wiki and the FAQ. hit us back if you have followup questions of course.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:44 PM
3

you haven't even glanced at the sidebar, have you?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:28 PM
7

nah i happen to agree that immediately following a rape conviction is really not the time to focus on the perpetrator, and moreso the time to focus on the victim. of course, the reaction to the inappropriate focus has, itself, grown to inappropriate proportions, but that doesn't change how i feel about it just not being cool to go there so soon while simultaneously ignoring the victim for the most part.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:37 AM
7

it's an understandable frustration. just remember to point to that the next time someone tries to tell you sexual assault is one sided or can't be used as a joke.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 03:12 AM
144

welcome to the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 12:39 AM
1

i'm liking this guy more and more, but i don't get what his angle is supposed to be. at first i thought he was a gaming community commentator, but he clearly ventures into more than that. any thoughts?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 12:35 AM
14

sweet...i'm a fucking hacker.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 12:31 AM
7

how about you respond to that comment and vet your position?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:20 PM
21

what a massive cunt.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 07:19 PM
7

Nah don't get wound up about it. Just point to it anytime someone tells you rape jokes can't be funny.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:45 PM
25

Yeah...amazing how so many peoppe can believe in a sociological theory when it doesn't even stand up to 10 seconds of critical analysis, isn't it?
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:05 PM
22

Apparently it's not good enough they be lead roles.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 11:56 PM
0

If we think that a woman can't rape a man, then Michelle would absolutely feel comfortable to override a man's protest that he doesn't want to have sex. but that is not merely a joke, it'd be an entire presumption on society's part. not the same thing. If friends make prison rape jokes all the time or even casual jokes about raping the losers of a video game, then there's no way Mike is going to feel okay telling them he got raped. Not only that, but he might not even want to prosecute or seek r…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:12 PM
1

take it in any way you want. you've failed to produce any evidence of your position outside your own anecdote too and assertions that you just know other states enforce the father's rights in cases of anonymous abandonment.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:09 PM
1

false dichotomy though. 1) i believe most people, despite the media hype, don't believe folks are asking to get raped when behaving in x,y,z ways. i'm sure many would agree there's actions one can take to minimize risks, but that's just sensible and universal. 2) i also don't think we'll ever see a time where jokes about rape, as well as jokes about every other crime, will be considered in such bad taste that they'll be eliminated from society. i'm not even sure i'd support something like that. …
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:08 PM
2

but that's the only environment that would make rapists feel freer to rape. are we really supposed to believe rapist Mike/Michelle would feel comfortable to rape because friends around them drop the occasional rape joke but would quickly admit actual rape is a horrible and despicable thing?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:24 PM
2

as someone so intimately familiar with safe haven laws i'm surprised you can't point to a majority of statutes that assert the state must attempt to find the father of an abandoned baby. afterall, even a statute that asserts an anonymous abandonment doesn't surrender the other parent's rights is empty if it doesn't mandate any action for ensuring the parent is found.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:18 PM
2

That's not my justification, its the State's. Do you think Safe Haven laws are designed to curtail men's rights? Please cite some real, actual sources. of course they aren't, that's merely the the unintended consequence. do you honestly believe any law gets passed without good intentions? Do you have any real, actual sources for that? Id love to read the case law and statutory law about this. how exactly am i supposed to prove a negative for you? familiarize yourself with other state's wording a…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:06 PM
5

I am a believer in the concept of rape culture, where our beliefs about rape victims and the act itself create an environment where perpetrators feel freer to rape and victims are hesitant to come forward. how can you think that when every sane person on the planet will easily admit to thinking actual incidences of rape are a horrible thing?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 07:46 PM
2

Sigh. Safe Haven laws are designed for the safety of the child. Parents were leaving unwanted babies in the forest/trash cans where they died. States decided that keeping a baby safe and alive was worth the father (temporarily) not knowing that his child had been surrendered. that's nice. your justification does nothing to void what i asserted. I am a lawyer. I do pro bono work (usually as a GAL) a few times a year for children in abandonment procedures. In most (10 out of 11 so far) abandonment…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:59 PM
2

except of course for the fact that safe haven laws allow for a single women to abandon the baby without any input by the father. so we're ok with women doing it but not men. love that fairness.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:44 PM
2

Oh right, abortion isn't a thing.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:49 PM
2

because that's not the end point of things. a women can further have sex, get pregnant, and still choose to eliminate her pending parenthood. a man can't. a woman can even legally do it after giving birth thanks to loopholes in the existing safe haven laws and how kidnapping is enforced.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:05 PM
2

Point it out, as you're doing. Or direct folks to forums, such as the other subs, where this is being pointed out.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:09 PM
5

That's totally a misreading of what I said. I'm simply suggesting others hop over to subs that are also discussing this topic and engage. If anything its a plea to be more than just an echo chamber here. After all, as place like /unitedkingdom may have insights we lack. I think discussion of that is valid as well.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:05 PM
3

sorry, but no. provoke rights to abortion if you feel so strongly that sex is consent to parenthood.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:29 PM
2

and one party has a distinct lack of options as opposed to the other. that's what's unequal.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:56 PM
1

I'd encourage everyone to check the "other discussions" tab and spend some time discussing the topic in other subs.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:14 PM
1

Not a big fan of equal opportunities, eh?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:57 PM
5

i don't think she herself thinks that, but was explaining the views of those past communities, who did assume men who weren't chivalrous were inherently cowards and scumbags.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:29 PM
5

come on Bohica, what'd you go into then?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:21 PM
5

hahaha, someone thinks he's the big wallet in the room. that's cute. so what'd you go into? with that kind of academic track you either got into algo trading or are running your own engineering firm if i had to guess. MAYBE you became a partner at an accounting firm, if the MS wasn't in engineering like i'm assuming.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:15 PM
12

let me guess... -45+ -lawyer...but the old school type...douchey and arrogant because you passed the bar and think that means everything. -normally i'd guess a prestigious upbringing and a tier 1 school...that you grew up thinking you were better then those with less money than you...but there's something about you that, instead, just screams low-tier law school attendee who ended up making a name for himself, climbed his way into the upper class, and now thinks he's better than everyone for it …
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:51 PM
16

yeah that's the hostility i mentioned. it's manifesting itself in your short temper, lack of patience & willingness to explain to those not as lucky to share your wisdom, and general arrogance. dial it back bud, or risk falling on deaf ears when you otherwise could have enlightened some folks.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:31 PM
15

dial it back bud. no need to get hostile over this.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:26 PM
35

i doubt it was when she was enjoying being the benefits of it.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:51 PM
-7

ohhhh what a bitch.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:50 PM
19

yes CNN, people experience violence. thank you for stating the obvious while ignoring an entire gender in your propaganda.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:45 PM
3

Keep us updated as you find out more of the details mate.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 01:30 PM
80

More appropriate for /r/srssucks.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:55 AM
4

Humor...we can't lose sight of it.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:25 AM
11

Dude...record!
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:52 PM
75

...I think you need to defriend your wife.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:51 PM
1

Plesse tell me you at least sent him a scathing email after the decision was made.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:55 PM
-1

The point is that even white women enjoyed the luxuries of being an oppressor. How anyone can claim they were oppressed while simultaneously oppressing others is just absurd.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 01:32 PM
-4

Most odd is the fact that he's gay.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 12:56 PM
2

haha well thank you, but mate anyone can do it. it's about minimizing the things that grant others inherent leverage over you. if you have a kid, your wife (because of the environment of the current court system) and Child Protective Services/Dept. of Child and Family Services will have inherent leverage over you. they may never use it, but you'll never be free of it. a lot of people take this a step further and say to never marry as marriage offers your wife inherent leverage too, but the truth…
/r/MensRights10/03/13 12:17 PM
9

i decided not to have kids and found a wife that shares my views on them and most social dynamics (MRA issues included). we spend our lives living a childfree-dual-income lifestyle mostly centered around self-fulfillment of desires and personal interests...lots of hobby exploration, travel, toys, and whatever else we feel like. i laugh openly at anyone who hates MRA's with the certain knowledge that i'm more happy and free than they'll ever be and that things are genuinely advancing in our favor…
/r/MensRights10/03/13 11:26 AM
1

uhhh what happened to /u/ErasmusMRA?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 10:17 AM
34

note what it says in the upper right corner...
/r/MensRights10/03/13 09:28 AM
1

i would just caution against considering it any sort of vasectomy. the pratical result is accurate, but it really is just a more effective form of male birth control. i may be being too much of a stickler though...
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:57 AM
3

SRS linked to the comment sometime ago. still watching it i suppose.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:04 AM
3

fair enough. and yeah, at least someone who hates me i can understand. how this guy has gone his whole life being that deluded is beyond me.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:27 AM
4

would you settle for "men who enable feminist thought"?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:23 AM
2

they matter, but mainly for organizational or clerical and legal matters. parents should decide for themselves how their family goes about it, but a society that didn't utilize surname structuring would have a very difficult time with certain common day tasks.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 02:44 AM
2

that's not exactly a solution to the issue now, is it?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 02:07 AM
2

how'd they decide what your legal full name would be?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 01:15 AM
14

this really feels like something more appropriate for /r/mensrants bud. :)
/r/MensRights09/03/13 04:45 AM
7

You gotta go over his head.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:32 AM
2

Pretty much up to the judge's discretion. Yeah, it's fucked up.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:28 AM
-1

was it as good for you as it was for me?
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:01 AM
3

For your information, I'm just lightly stroking in, not sucking it. In a kind of casual manner. Like when you're watching a slow movie and suddenly realize your hand has been down there for a few minutes already without you realizing it. Pretty frustrating sensation truth be told.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:17 PM
5

And you just jumped the shark.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:03 PM
10

We don't get along.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:33 AM
1

Because of course, there aren't any women who oppose abortion. Yep, only male pro-lifers exist.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:26 PM
17

One of my eyes just rolled right out of its socket.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:01 PM
11

You need to speak with a local attorney who knows your state's specific statutes.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 05:32 AM
11

I live in a country where abortion is pretty much entirely banned. gotta stop you right there and point out both this sub and even the feminism subs are pretty much western world focused, if not USA focused. for countries outside of that scope things are indeed very different and gender arguments normally seen on reddit as a whole fall apart. as you get to further down in your prompt, location is a big component of the discussion.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:03 AM
3

Don't ever change.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 07:02 AM
2

Don't be a douche J.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 04:56 PM
10

You need to have a serious discussion with her about it. Go from there.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 04:11 AM
5

i hope you feel bad for taking that very desirable username away from someone who would have used it for more than just trolling.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 07:43 AM
1

the extent of my certainty on the matter is this: relationships come with an obligation of honesty and trust between the involved parties. an instance of dishonesty-by-omission regarding such a major piece of information is just not appropriate nor acceptable.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 07:42 AM
2

Eh, I like to think most...that being your average folk on the street...fit the dictionary definition and not the string-attached academic definition. At least I hope.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 01:48 PM
3

My favorite thing is the food. Seriously, our weekly meetings have some of the best sandwiches and snacks ever!
/r/MensRights02/03/13 01:41 PM
2

Sterba's put out almost as many books as years he's been a professor...is anyone else immediately suspicious of someone who spits out books at that rate? A well sourced and researched book can take years to complete, but this guy is putting out one every 1.25 years for almost 3 decades?
/r/MensRights02/03/13 01:39 PM
5

Yes. Most average people are feminists, and the "good" kind, in fact. In truth most MRA's are feminists by virtue of what we believe in. Don't let the vocal minority of extremists and radical theorists make you think otherwise.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 01:31 PM
4

Somebody forgot a link, didn't they?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:11 PM
2

Ahh gotcha. What do you focus on?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:07 AM
2

Hahaha it's foolproof. You hear about Kass' claim regarding the Apple stock split later today?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:01 AM
4

Haha nice. Daytrader huh? What's your investment strategy?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:53 AM
6

Too bad the comments make me want to slam my face against a wall.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:51 AM
6

What field and what country?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:26 AM
-1

if you reddit while interacting with people in the real world...you're gonna have a bad time.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:05 AM
-5

I made you spit your drink out on your keyboard, didn't I?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:54 AM
0

unfortunately, they're both.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:52 AM
-3

they're jerking more than i ever have, and i've had a penis for 36 years!
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:45 AM
1

god, the comments are discouraging as hell. so many stupid college kids ready to toss out labels.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:24 AM
15

haha, top comment... I’m no fan of the conventional MRA and not even a major fan of masculinity (my own included). David are you kidding me david? taking bets this guy cuts himself at night...
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:17 AM
13

for some reason this story was also posted to /anarchism...
/r/MensRights26/02/13 11:43 PM
1

yeah, no. one act does not justify the other. or do you likewise believe a female rapist should be stripped of access to any kids that result from her getting pregnant when she rapes a guy?
/r/MensRights26/02/13 11:29 PM
3

that works too.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 09:12 AM
12

it really comes down to what you feel the requirements of being a feminist are, or how you otherwise define the label. if you go with the original definition of "for men and women to have equal rights" or most anything else up through first wave feminism, then you'll be hard pressed to find an MRA who doesn't meet that definition. if you feel a feminist MUST believe in Patriarchy Theory, or notions of rape culture, or other 2nd wave and later concepts then you're gonna have some difficulties. tl…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 07:57 AM
5

i'm pretty certain he's never identified as an MRA. can't say anything beyond that.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:56 AM
11

sorry, but how old is he and she roughly?
/r/MensRights26/02/13 01:29 AM
6

Where's the common sense in further disassociating rights from responsibilities? I sympathize with any rape victim, but no one has any right to demand support for a child from a parent while simultaneously denying them access.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:29 PM
6

/r/daddit
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:06 PM
11

If you really want to piss them off just point out objectification isn't actually a bad thing inherently.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:51 AM
8

Honestly, that really world work perfectly.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 09:10 AM
38

i'd actually like to hear more about how the exchange went with the manager. did you meet any resistance there? did she try to claim she wasn't doing anything? did they just decide you were being more honest or did they have to check security cam footage?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:18 AM
4

really, it's the "having kids" part that leaves a man open to trouble. when kids are in the picture alimony and assignment of the marital home becomes more likely as a result. so, can you go without kids? that's the real question... beyond that, not reall. prenups are it.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:15 AM
5

want a real mindfuck? look at the name of the user who submitted that to /feminisms.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:21 AM
-1

Ever encounter tygertyger in /feminism? They try to act like they're a mod and the self-appointed overseer of the sub's integrity. It's simply hilarious.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 02:51 AM
1

Yes, but you know you like us :)
/r/MensRights24/02/13 02:48 AM
13

Better comments section than I expected. Good to know the push for PC at Harvard undergrad hasn't really bled into the law program.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 02:58 PM
12

If not trolling...your university should have a department overseeing any and all student organizations. Go speak with them about the material this group appears to be spreading. They're often operatings under the Dean of Students dept or something similiar.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 12:42 PM
13

Not really. You have a better chance of winning a case of slander, and those chances aren't great. If you want, share your situation with a lawyer. Most usually offer a free consultation for exactly that purpose. Otherwise, maybe make a stink about it to your superiors and get her reprimanded.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:10 AM
15

Welcome to the MRM, the only gender movement that seems to have a competent understanding of how young adults actually interact.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 07:02 AM
2

Certainly possible.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 05:45 AM
5

might be that the varying opinions here all have large supporters.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 05:32 AM
5

those motherfuckers...
/r/MensRights21/02/13 10:00 PM
2

the takeway i'm getting is that vasectomies are NOT covered...is that what you meant earlier?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:33 PM
2

i haven't read up on the bill enough...what's the vasectomy coverage supposed to be?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:24 PM
9

To think that you must believe in a grand conspiracy theory and ignore half the situation.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:06 AM
10

Thank you! I read it shortly after you last posted it...this past week right?...but forgot who had said it. Was hoping someone would step forward. It's really quite illuminating. Feminists aren't wrong when they claim there's a thing that hurts men and women, but they're so off base when they gender the term and attribute it to men. The thing is nothing more than society and its gender expectations.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:04 AM
4

Calling society patriarchy is like looking at a fruit bowl filled with bananas and peaches and calling it a banana bowl. Also, I thought bell hooks was disliked by feminists...no?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:29 AM
17

whys is it anything but a debate over bodily autonomy? i don't care if cutting off my foreskin granted me a lifetime of wishes by a fucking genie...it's my body and no one has the right to do that without my approval.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 06:15 AM
3

true point. it can really go either way.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 04:34 AM
3

except /amr doesn't claim to represent feminism.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 04:33 AM
3

Like /amr does?
/r/MensRights20/02/13 04:02 AM
2

It was a reference to the hostility I think.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 03:32 AM
13

I use to kill people for a living...we all have our epiphany moments and change our ways.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:48 AM
12

Not that I disagree, but you really think this particular example isn't related?
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:44 AM
19

any chance we can get this added to the sidebar or wiki, for when others claim only female sexuality was put in check?
/r/MensRights20/02/13 12:51 AM
3

you need a good lawyer.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 12:01 AM
5

honest, just get a vasectomy and store some sperm just in case. best option.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 12:00 AM
10

ask the mods to do it Feel free to email me at [email protected] .
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:59 PM
18

ahh damn. speak with your wallet. don't join.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:33 PM
2

pretty sure the best way to end the circlejerk is to have the dean step in and force the teacher to better moderate the class. also, Masculinity is just the rejection of femininity- it is not really its own thing is inherently stupid. to think that one must be completely unaware of history, biology, evolution, and probably theology.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:10 PM
23

contact the HQ of the chain and suggest a revision to the policy.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:55 PM
1

record your class and present the crazy shit to your teacher's boss. crap like "Masculinity is just the rejection of femininity- it is not really its own thing" in particular...fuck that's an idiot right there.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:19 PM
3

you might want to delete this, and resubmit with a link to http://www.ellentv.com/2013/02/19/get-ready-to-bid-on-justins-underwear/ for a greater impact.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:05 PM
15

vasectomy my man. store some sperm if you think you'll want kids.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:25 PM
1

thanks. so why do you post here so sporadically?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:47 AM
1

i suppose i got into it more than i meant to. see elsewhere in the thread for examples of that being demonstrably false. which comment?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:25 AM
1

and how is that negated by anything i've said? i've been explaining how women were treated in kind, as an analogue, not saying they were actual property. i've also never said you deny your waiter or landscaper any autonomy.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 02:42 AM
0

Tell me, what does treating someone like a person really entail beyond what I've said?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:35 AM
-2

How so?
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:57 AM
-1

I've already posited one way someone could be treated like property without being the negative scenario you lay out. Besides, this is an analogy. We're not discussing people who were actually treated as propoerty, but attempting to explain how women might have enjoyed special accomodations in history.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 05:59 AM
11

sunday nights are very active for trolls.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 05:21 AM
3

lurk for a week. feel free to repost then if you are still unsure.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 05:21 AM
-2

i have a hard time agreeing to that given just how often people really constrict others to property. your waiter is nothing more than a food conveyor. your landscaper is little more than a talking lawnmower. face it...we view almost everyone as property in one way or another. because most everyone is only as valuable as their purpose to you.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 05:19 AM
1

interesting question.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:21 AM
-4

for funsies, let's say women were viewed as property. your GF is looking at that as if women were viewed like chairs, or slaves, or pets, or farm animals, or toilets, or something other piece of property that humans typically use without regard. what she needs to understand is if women were ever treated like property, it was more akin to a piece of fine jewelry or inheritance piece, or an expensive classic show car, or a cherished cabinet piece passed down from a parent...they were protected, he…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 11:58 PM
5

why is perfect use fairly demanding? roll it on properly. roll it on early.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 11:54 PM
0

where?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 09:08 PM
-1

yeah, major red flags. i'd pass unless you want her to be the mother of your kids in a year.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:08 AM
1

Seriously, this is the country the West is losing jobs to?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 12:16 AM
11

Leave the country.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 12:14 AM
1

I doubt too, but no it belongs in an evidence folder.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:41 AM
19

Report. End of discussion. Also, therapy if you feel the need.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:39 AM
12

Was gonna say...
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:38 AM
25

Elaborate.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:33 AM
19

You know this place is torn on feminists. While your source is fantastic, it's utterly buried by the amount of writing coming from pop-feminists who insist the hierarchy of importance is women and children ... ... men. And unfortunately many more people read the pop-feminism crap.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:30 AM
106

god FUCK kids. i'm sick and tired of society using them as justification for treating a man as nothing more than a wallet. any society with an interest in justice would send the women to prison, give the kid to the man, and let him give it up for adoption if he wanted to.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 05:22 AM
2

Yeah, bigots raped that entry.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 09:35 AM
2

I struggle to follow the organization of comment chains on that site. Anyone else?
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:07 AM
4

I almost never like to think in these terms, but that's a freaking beta.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 02:04 AM
8

I have no idea what you're referring to mate..never seen an MRA here defend the 1 in 4 stat. Don't know what else to say.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 12:35 AM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjUSFHRCEOI Admit it you want this kind of joy...
/r/MensRights14/02/13 05:51 AM
9

i don't treat anyone like a princess as i don't live under a monarchy. still a fan of tiaras though...
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:04 AM
5

Cry harder about it troll.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 07:58 AM
9

oh for christ sake...great to see the little piece by the WashPo, but fucking hell look at the comments. most of them are still trying to counterargue the reality.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:05 AM
5

the issue is if it passes i guarantee you the attempt to create improved legislation later on with the intention of replacing VAWA will be exponentially more difficult. politicians are some of the laziest, busiest bastards on the planet. pass VAWA and any attempt down the road to replace it will be met with "buy why, we already have VAWA in place", "we don't need that, VAWA is already a thing", "VAWA is good enough for now and i'm too busy with other projects". the fact is politics happens in th…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:28 AM
2

no i realize OP's issue is child custody. i was just speaking from my perspective.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 01:52 AM
2

we even had cake.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:37 AM
4

riiight, because little boys aren't suffering from being turned into child solders in africa, aren't suffering the hit to bodily autonomy that is infant circumcision, aren't...ah fuck it, you suck Deputy Director Bullock.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:36 AM
8

women's rights has had countless decades of activity more than us. it's pretty logical that they'd be at a point of default presumption in society, given the success of feminism. now it's just time for men's rights to make headway as well.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:32 AM
14

because even we aren't certain what the numbers really are. and the truth is we mention the issue surrounding false rape accusations at every relevant opportunity. maybe if SOMEONE had come to the meeting last thursday they'd know this...
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:31 AM
2

problem is even if his state is one that does, it doesn't apply to parental responsibilities (i.e. child support), unless the other man formally adopts the child. he could give up rights (visitation and custody), the other guy could never adopt the child, he and the women could divorce years down the road, and OP could be hit with an expectation to pay back-child support. a great lawyer could possibly change that, but there's no certainty.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:09 AM
2

ehhh homophobia isn't the right word for it, as few here are expressing any kind of fear or distaste for homosexuals. it's more like ignorance or generalizing. lot of people are calling out those flaws with the image though, thankfully.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:56 PM
10

which ones?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:51 PM
1

might want to ask /r/movies.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:40 PM
3

uh...wow. freaking wow. he could trash the check and fight for custody, but then would indeed have to deal with those people the rest of his life. he could take the check, but if the ex and her new husband ever split, she could file for back-child support in the future, even if he does sign away his parental rights. assuming the other guy doesn't formally adopt the boy. talk about a mess.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:28 PM
3

My question, again, is there any way to prevent a man from having to support a child he doesn't want course. legal parental surrender. an absolvement of all rights AND responsibilities to a child that is birthed without the consent of the father. have the gov't figure out a minimum amount of funds needed to raise a child in a given area and let them provide it. limit that to only 2 kids of a given mother though. it's really not that complicated.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:18 PM
10

i think we have a long way to go.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 09:37 PM
1

i just think attempts to claim supremacy are inevitable. any group/race/gender/whatever that has a shot at being top dog will take it. that being the case, i fault no group for attempting to maintain their position relative to others. i'll push for equality always, but i know that just means i'll eventually have to turn on the group i'm supporting because they'll go too far at some point.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:07 PM
1

if true, that wouldn't surprise me very much. it takes a certain type of open-minded individual to visit here regularly...a certain mindset that rejects the presumed narrative of western society that suggest "men bad, women good" and such. anyone who's able to question that and come here has a higher likelihood of questioning other presumed paradigms and visiting other subs like /whiterights. i'm sure a few of those who are at least willing to ask the question will find interest in the answers t…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 07:28 PM
1

IMO deserves to be lost. why on that point in particular?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 07:24 PM
3

as you point out, if women really do control that much of the spending on cars, than they're far from in need of a day dedicated to their special focus. though i seriously doubt those numbers are widely different for men...not too many girlfriends/wives going car buying without their man having influence as well. tl;dr...it's stupid as fuck.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:01 PM
3

Redditors don't have lives. It's in the user agreement!
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:23 AM
6

Why post this in the middle of the night where it'll be buried by midday?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 09:34 AM
18

Honestly, I really want to support feminism, but feminists make it so damn hard to do so these days. At least now you know who among your friends is a narrow minded sockpuppet of an ideology that can't take any amount of criticism or deviation without lobbing insults.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 07:23 AM
-1

i want a link.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:46 AM
4

rightsbot shows up in every self post. nothing personal. we had a troll sometime ago that made lengthy self posts, garnerd sympathy, then edit their prompts to make things look much worse than what everyone originally responded to. rightsbot just snaps screenshots of original text. i'd suggest anything by christina hoff sommers and warren farrell, to start.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:06 AM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:38 AM
1

there's much bigger issues in that sub than that particular comment. read the post text and you'll understand what i'm referencing. that OP is fucked.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 01:29 AM
4

it's pretty funny actually. they advocate anarchism but actively avoid it in their own lil sub.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 01:19 AM
1

it certainly has, but in the modern world all that presumption really does is grant them default power in regards to children. maybe you want to think it's a burden to be presumed most qualified to handle kids, but that simply provides women the first opportunity to anything related to such tasks. they still have the option to say no, and only then are men usually given an option of any sort.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:16 PM
45

you don't understand. enforcing THOSE gender roles isn't sexism, silly. it's only the roles that can be seen to negatively affect women that are sexist.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 12:40 AM
5

damn, i'm more tired than i thought. COMPLETELY missed the pronouns.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:56 PM
7

that's great! out of curiosity, was the dean male or female?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:49 PM
1

it's one of those days... what's the implication?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:47 PM
19

So many hopeless people out there.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 08:38 PM
6

/r/Anarcho_Capitalism
/r/MensRights07/02/13 04:33 PM
3

trust me, you'd KNOW if you were on the sex offender registry.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 03:28 AM
0

I can't tell who's the boy and who's the girl.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 02:15 AM
3

I should know this, but why not just refuse to take the kids? Would at least cut down on the financial hit.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 02:00 AM
4

You deserve this.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 08:27 PM
210

Oh fuck everything about this.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:26 AM
-3

this women is such an embarrassment to her generation. the fact that she's a feminist idol makes original feminists roll over in their graves.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 07:23 AM
0

now that's a good meal right there. but they always mess up the asparagus. you gotta really grill the hell out of it till it's nice and crispy. with just a BIT of butter.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 01:48 AM
3

it's a legal matter bud. hire an attorney and let them know you want visitation perimeters revisited. or do you and the mother have an informal agreement and haven't included the court system so far?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:36 PM
3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuPPA4wcj2Q&feature=youtu.be&t=1m15s
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:15 PM
16

i usually recommend a good filet mignon, medium-rare. but yeah, GWW is great too.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:57 PM
4

ha i imagine most are still sleeping. quite a few were up past their normal bed time last night it seemed.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:21 PM
11

wasn't me, but this totally belongs in /metaMR haha
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:11 PM
10

run along little doggie.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:01 PM
13

and yet not here. you should think about that.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:59 PM
4

can't deny i'd be hesitant as well to go too far with them. i've come across that user a few times and the comment chains never seemed to have been productive. but remember, the discussion is usually more for the observer than the individual you're actually engaged with. that being the case, if you can, i'd say make your primary points, go a level or two down, but don't bother repeating yourself or letting yourself get dragged across too many sidetopics.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:12 AM
14

haha, indeed. you're the shining example mate. you, AnnArchist, and a couple others are fantastic in there.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:58 AM
3

just want to confirm that. female birth control pills are easy, in comparison, because they already have a biological mechanism for stopping conception/pregnancy. the hormones that drive that mechanism can be replicated in pill form. men, on the other hand, have no biological function for ending sperm production. a normal male will produce the little swimmers up until the day he dies, so there's no mechanism for a pill to even replicate.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:54 AM
57

/r/subredditdrama would literally explode.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:43 AM
3

hey...thanks.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:32 AM
40

comment, don't vote.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:31 AM
1

You forgot the link.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:59 AM
0

Get a prenup you fool. Don't combine all your finances, even if you oversee them all. Instead, have your own account where your salary goes and make her maintain her own account where her salary goes. Have ONE joint account that you each contribute to regularly. That account should only be used for family bills. Assume you'll contribute more but don't let her get away without contributing at all if she's working. Groceries she buys? From the joint account. Monthly check to kids karate? From the …
/r/MensRights30/01/13 09:30 AM
1

oh my god please fucking kill me now! we are all dumber for having read that.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:06 AM
4

actually, it sounds like you're dad does get why you'd be upset, feels ashamed he did it to you, and sucks at expressing himself with maturity. i could be wrong, but his violence towards you could really be him projecting his own anger with himself.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 07:34 AM
5

i'm really at the point where i can't help but think "fuck kids" and immediately reject anyone who uses them to pander to me. it's just so fucking cliched.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 05:21 AM
120

Ha. Low hanging fruit and we really shouldn't be on this, but damn if I didn't chuckle.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:18 PM
-1

Bud, there's a comments section...
/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:30 AM
5

Depends on who you ask. Personally, I have no problem employing the tactics of your enemy. But I'm glad others here feel otherwise.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 07:52 PM
4

Im ready to give up xlinking when SRS does.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:59 PM
8

Great, now you've jinxed it.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:18 AM
3

check the comments. some idiot is mouthing off about discrimination already while claiming to be a "gender expert". fuck i'm tired of idiots holding to their bigotry.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 02:11 AM
2

even Obama mentioned the supposed gap in his inauguration speech. we have so far to go...
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:01 PM
12

sex makes an embryo. a fetus at most. the woman unilaterally decides to let that turn into a baby via inaction.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:57 PM
10

Be ready for the large amount of non-answers you're about to get.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 04:59 AM
1

Haha I think you scared OP off.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 04:51 AM
15

/againstmensrights have latched on to this. http://www.reddit.com/r/againstmensrights/comments/16qldj/look_at_this_handy_petition/
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:35 AM
3

No I'm pretty sure condemnation is appropriate in the presence of someone vile enough to lie to hurt another individual so immensely.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:31 AM
0

some people really need to just die a miserable death. fuck. lawyer!
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:28 AM
13

/2xc can be such a disappointment sometimes.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:24 AM
3

imagine two seperate bubbles hanging in the air. one is labeled "men's work" and the other is labeled "women's work". women are now given free reign to engage in activities that exist within each bubble (for the most part...assholes do exist, afterall). they can hang out in the women's work bubble, leave it, and even enter the men's work bubble and do whatever is commonly found there. men, on the other hand, are ridiculed as soon as they leave their bubble; they don't even have to step foot into…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 08:05 PM
57

haha, yeah. Vachette can be pretty vile.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:55 PM
10

but this word was used in reference to intelligence, and the context was in a discussion of two people who's IQ was seperated by MAYBE 15 points. and did you really just lump ADHD in with bipolarism and Parkinsons? fuck man grow out of the obsession with victimhood. look, discussions of mental ability shouldn't even include the word privilege as THAT'S useless. there's no point to bringing it up. there's no need to put a word to something every normal person already gets.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:15 AM
8

Its not visual rape if you're brown eyed!
/r/MensRights14/01/13 10:08 PM
20

I kid you not, I have seen the term "neuroprivilege" be used without an ounce of sarcasm behind it.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 09:47 PM
1

this comment is all in reference to your infamous paternity fraud comment from sometime ago. i was wondering what your thoughts on it were?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:44 AM
1

hahaha, holy fuck, this has been linked to in /againstmensrights with the greatest level of spin and misunderstanding that i've ever seen... http://www.reddit.com/r/againstmensrights/comments/16irn5/mra_finds_out_woman_has_a_femdom_fetish_wants/
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:42 AM
-3

/u/Aerik, is that you?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:41 AM
2

bail.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:40 AM
25

WAIT! ok, i got my popcorn.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:32 AM
0

sure. i chuckled. duh.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 11:44 PM
1

that's the thinking yeah.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:13 AM
2

actually no one is having sex with her other than the dom. her profile stipulates she's only looking for friends and events. this really doesn't belong here, but i'm still gonna discuss it cuz i'm curious.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 02:09 AM
2

high five fellow kinkster! note, though, that she's bisexual. presumably, she's open to meeting someone of either gender then. so i would wonder why the request to meet her dom is directed only at men. given her sexual orientation i would especially think it would apply to both genders.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 01:58 AM
2

but does feminist = liberal?
/r/MensRights11/01/13 01:47 AM
7

interesting... on the one hand, that request is probably a result of her BDSM lifestyle, and less one of sexism. on the other, why does she only specify men? i wouldn't care if the request/demand specified anyone, but yeah since it singles out men...
/r/MensRights11/01/13 01:46 AM
1

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA holy god that's so hilarious and awful at the same time.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 01:01 AM
6

meh. it's a lot more complex then that. a better angle may be to point out how few options men have compared to women for dressing up. but that's not entirely accurate either.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:43 AM
2

link to the /funny post? i'm curious what the context was.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:52 PM
10

OP has linked to this thread in /againstmensrights.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:35 PM
12

OP is a troll, check their brief comment history.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 09:05 PM
0

Ha, check the duplicates tab. This was posted to /2xc a year ago with the idea that it counters "false rape accusation hubabaloo" by a user heavily involved in SRS.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:52 AM
2

it's going to vary depending on where you live and the type of facility you store with (private sperm bank vs. one affiliated with a medical facility or a medical school, for example). as an anecdote, my costs were about $300 a year for storage. the rate actually dropped to $250 a year after the first 5 years now that i'm thinking about it. the procedure itself was less than $2000...insurance covered most of that. and i've been told insemination costs shouldn't go above $5000. that last part can…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:22 AM
3

proper freezing techniques (those practiced by every sperm storage facility in the US) can keep sperm viable indefinitely. literally, for decades and decades.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:18 AM
1

I'm storing for 10years come 2014 when the 1st annual fee ran out i didn't understand this statement, can you elaborate? and yo, good idea. it's exactly what i did long ago.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:17 AM
3

hahaha, oddly enough a pearl necklace i got for her many years ago is her favorite piece of jewelry. she tells me the joke stopped being funny about 5 years back but i still mention it from time to time :)
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:57 AM
2

They go beyond that and say it's prudent for them to join any discussion that isn't in line with their belief system. I don't fault them for when they brigade threads actually talking about them. How do you feel about that difference?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:49 PM
32

Interesting...I thought you needed to have a penis to jerk yourself off. Guess not.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:40 PM
2

She also submitted the article to /amr.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:26 PM
6

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/duplicates/166z4i/feminist_concern_over_the_mrms_rising_political/ The article was linked here twice in the last 4 months. As for linking to the other thread...you might be right. But is it not prudent to join the discussion when others are talking about us?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:26 PM
7

So should we all stop xlinking?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:56 PM
3

hmmm, yay and oh crap!
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:01 PM
7

what does that piece have to do with /politics? honestly, has that sub just become a catchall for whatever people want to post?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:33 PM
4

My wife prefers pearls...fucking love her!
/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:44 PM
1

That's news to me...
/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:41 PM
6

But this stuff is gold!!!
/r/MensRights07/01/13 07:17 AM
3

god child support honestly needs to be tied directly and unquestionably to visitation.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:26 AM
1

You'd be surprised. The fervent liberal who embraces radical feminism is a major problem, but so is the fervent conservative who still believes men should be strong and women should be given preference for the sake of her protection. Texas strongly embraces that second type of thinking.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:39 PM
3

Party central yo.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 12:24 AM
1

Look at the other discussions tab...some private sub has linked to this as well.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 12:13 AM
1

try that link again.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:57 PM
5

sorry to nitpick, but the article doesn't mention libertarians. just ancaps. why the mention of libertarian economists in your headline? am i missing something?
/r/MensRights17/12/12 09:51 PM
4

And yet we know for a fact most murders aren't committed by white men...
/r/MensRights17/12/12 02:24 PM
-3

i don't even have my christmas tree up...
/r/MensRights17/12/12 05:22 AM
5

I feel like when I found out that Orscon Scott Card was a psychotic homohater. doesn't matter, Ender still rules.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 01:21 AM
0

that's why i'm glad when people downvote it.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 10:55 PM
3

Fuck man sorry. Really sorry. Been on phone all day and couldn't verify it.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 01:16 AM
3

My pleasure. Did it end up working and being the current text?
/r/MensRights15/12/12 01:09 AM
7

http://www.2shared.com/document/NEXrkhyY/The_Myth_of_Male_Power_PDF.html This appears to be the book. Scan those quotes and see if you have a different interpretation.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:03 PM
6

Report it you wanker.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:03 PM
5

Tell them you think they're being incredibly sexist by suggesting grown women are so easily moved by peer pressure and they're denying women have their own agency. And to go fuck themselves for being a whiny cunt.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:15 AM
2

you need a couples therapist and a lawyer.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:55 AM
7

You might like... http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b48_1305790944
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:26 AM
3

Very true. That's why I'm up too. But we all know reddit is mostly Americans and I like the subject matter, so I wanted to encourage OP to repost if this gets buried by the new posts in the morning.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:22 AM
2

Ahh fuck.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:17 AM
1

Interesting. Bringing acts like that under the umbrella of rape would all but eliminate what qualifies as sexual assault. Want that?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:48 AM
1

Pretty sure I left a comment reminding all of our past praise of her in that thread.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:39 AM
1

It's the middle of the night. Repost tomorrow if this doesn't get much traction mate.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:37 AM
4

True. If she attained envelopement without him being hard, still rape. If she only touched him and never inserted, well, a prosecutor may try for rape but that would assuredly end up just sexual assault. Again, it'd take a really aggressive prosecutor to call that rape. If it's less than intercourse it's typically just sexual assault. True.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:26 AM
15

where was the "Female Privilege" slide?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:50 AM
33

phsyical stimuli of the penis is all that's needed to get it hard. consciousness doesn't change that. chick fondles guy's dick while he's passed out>he gets hard while passed out>she rides him while he's passed out...rape.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:47 AM
4

you left something out...
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:27 AM
5

bingo.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:19 AM
5

interesting question. the way i see it, misandry and misogyny lay at the ends of the sexism spectrum. they're the extreme in either direction. i've spent some time humoring the idea that there's actually very little misogyny and misandry in the world, but a large amount of sexism towards both genders. not sure if i'm settled on it though just yet. if I think men are superior to women in my personal view of how that sexism spectrum breaks down, such a belief would only be sexism. it would enter t…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:00 AM
4

I suppose that's better than nothing, but I'd be wary of anyone funneling info through manboobz. That's merely the other side of the spin coin. Just link to her video directly.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 12:13 PM
2

only because i was quoting someone else and it was capitalized in the source material. i'd feel dirty altering someone else's words.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 10:51 AM
2

it's kinda my thing not to capitalize.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 10:16 AM
1

so many people need to be killed. so many.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:26 AM
8

he doesn't even have the balls to post the video to lets others decide for themselves how she acted.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:12 AM
5

shouldn't it be "girlwriteswhat: Stand up comedian ..."?
/r/MensRights11/12/12 05:19 AM
2

yep. it's a classic. been posted a few times over the years too. that whole channel is worth watching.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:53 AM
9

both seem equally stupid to me.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:44 AM
2

Like someone else here said, extremist feminism is to the left what extremist religion is to the right; the main source of "our" lunatics. this is quickly becoming my favorite analogy for the week. from your perspective, will the near future bring feminism and socialism closer together, or further apart? i only ask because the US's own right is very likely on its way to distancing itself from the extremist right over the next decade.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:43 AM
14

mother of god... it's disturbingly accurate.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:39 AM
3

oh i'm familiar with keynes, and hayek, and mises, and rothbard...econ background here mate. and you raise a fair point. "socialism" these days has come to mean different things depending on who you're talking to. for some, it's a reference to gov't system setup in a given country. for others, it's the type of marketplace that exists in a given area's economy. so my question, then, is which of those is this Int'l Socialists group referencing? to which of those camps does the feminist angle apply…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:29 AM
4

now that i can definitely understand. thanks!
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:36 AM
5

but not surprised that a socialist organization was involved in the protest could you elaborate? i take that to mean the socialism community has a hard-to-ignore hard feminist line in it?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:57 AM
6

now that is good to hear.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:56 AM
9

oh come now that can't be true. i certainly disagree with the perspective, but i've known folks who were socialist simply because they believed it best helped the most people. now, these types weren't rabid anti-capitalists either, nor believed in all the oppressor bullshit, so maybe they were really different.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:13 AM
11

holy. fuck. any not-crazy socialists care to comment?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:49 AM
1

i chuckled.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:45 AM
1

ok. i don't really share your perspective of the content here. then again, i'm subbed to a lot of subs and keep busy when browsing.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:08 AM
2

http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Concern_troll i swear folks, this was the second google search result.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:55 AM
0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYihhSS9kic
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:51 AM
5

"How common do you think your belief that boys and men need greater attention is among prominent gender debate/social justice/equality figure heads"?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:00 PM
5

AMA. AMA. AMA.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:18 PM
46

I didn't realize we're only about white guys here... God I hate idiots.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:15 PM
11

Our fan club.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:17 PM
3

Anyone else have scrolling problems on the avfm site when browsing on their phone?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 04:32 PM
3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FgMLROTqJ0
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:47 AM
6

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/zsd8c/one_of_you_has_repeatedly_posted_a_fantastic/
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:46 AM
14

He needs a better one.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:32 PM
22

Unfortunately, lawyer up or leave the country are the only real options when dealing with a hostile ex using these tactics.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:15 PM
135

Leave the country.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:31 PM
3

Then ask her to prove her stats. Ask her for a source, study, something. Observers will note her lack of one.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 07:49 AM
12

I wouldn't.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:59 AM
1

Damn that's beautiful. Probably one of the better briefs on why the MRM needs to exist as well.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:39 AM
1

How is a man protected and empowered in a way that woman isn't as well?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:36 AM
1

Dammit. This is gonna bother me all weekend now.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:13 AM
12

If we're seriously going to start judging porn, let's start with the fact that most scenes reduce the man to a faceless or nameless cock, devoid of any real emotion or enthusiasm or life. Then again, i dont think we should honestly be judging porn.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:41 AM
3

I don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:37 AM
1

Good point. Any idea when we adopted the French word for such usage?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:30 AM
1

Aren't both words technically accurate and acceptable?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:18 AM
7

I'm just trying to decide if I've seen it happen enough here to regard it as common or not. I've def seen it happen though, and a good argument could be made that we should be more tolerant or at least less judgemental.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:01 AM
12

He's saying we rip on bronies. I'm on the fence as to the accuracy of that assertion.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:51 AM
2

Not gonna lie, you have my interest peaked. But I don't know what the usual places are :(
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:47 AM
12

it's true, but i can't seem to find a clip of it unfortunately.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:26 AM
1

just for simplicity sake, can you edit in the link to the thread SB made on the shadowban? now that it's back up...
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:25 AM
0

just a heads up, this will probably get deleted. we have a policy against linking to /SRS and generally treating them as anything worth discussing.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:55 AM
1

i like to wave at idiots like this as i pass them by.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:57 AM
12

it's "brah".
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:54 AM
7

"prove to me the playing field isn't currently level"
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:53 AM
13

did you really just discount the utility and relevance of social media in one fell swoop? news flash, the social virtual world is quickly outpacing the social real world for everything from communication to group organization. maybe you want to step into the 21st century with the rest of us?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:47 AM
8

i'm against doxxing that links people's real life identities to their reddit accounts. that's the only doxxing i've ever been against and the only definition i've ever used. ID'ing people featured in a video that's been posted all over the net, particularly people that have involved themselves in the drama by writing about the event...that's not doxxing.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:47 AM
9

this is what i want more than anything from the admins: define doxxing explicitly! what is and isn't doxxing. does doxxing only apply to reddit users? at what point does someone become famous enough that their personal ID should be assumed public knowledge.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:22 AM
6

what doxxing?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:03 AM
1

correct, access to the trust is withdrawn. if the benefactor happens to empty the trust before breaking the contract, then the trustee of the trust...normally a rep with a financial firm handling it or some OTHER relative...is obligated to pursue legal action against the benefactor.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:39 AM
4

yes, that would be doable. you'd be surprised by what rules some trusts require the benefactor to abide by in exchange for access. let's just say Brewster's Millions isn't the biggest stretch to come out of hollywood. that said, be upfront about a prenup. don't try to blame it on anything as a show, just admit you desire a prenup for cautionary purposes.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:05 AM
9

He's the one who about a year ago wrote up that FANTASTIC hypothetical scenario detailing exactly how a women could use the govt and law to screw over a man regarding intentional unilateral pregnancies, paternity fraud, and child support. It gets posted every once in a while again. It should really be in the sidebar.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:27 PM
3

Bingo.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:02 AM
8

very cool. hopefully she takes that skill as far as possible in the sports industry.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:54 AM
16

i still don't think that's a fair representation though. or, at least, even quantifiable. It's almost entirely social. suggests that the gap would all but disappear if girls practiced as much as boys. i don't think that's true and the studies the article mentions don't suggest it's true either. the take away that i pick up on is boys would still have a significant advantage due to genetics. not a slight one.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 02:15 AM
29

to be fair, that article doesn't conclude girls could throw as well as boys, it just concludes girls could throw better than they currently do. it argues the gap in ability would lessen, not be eliminated. apply the same amount of practice to both genders, and boys would still have an edge due to greater amounts of upper body strength and motor function.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:36 AM
1

i'm copywriting it. you'll be hearing from my lawyer.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:32 AM
0

because it's a sexual fetish. it's acted on for a sexual release. I just don't see someone putting on different clothes as "being forced to alter themselves so drastically". but that's also not the full extent of it. it's not simply about putting on clothes normally reserved for another gender. they the clothes on, they take a more submissive sexual posture (also more common among women then men) they put on the makeup/wigs...taken as a whole, the fetish is one wherein they temporarily become wo…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:26 AM
0

well said.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:06 AM
-3

you sure you're not mischaracterizing the forced feminization fetish at all? my understanding of it was that the humiliation didn't come from a place of viewing being a women as degrading, but that they were being forced to alter themselves so drastically by another person. and this doesn't even touch on the guys who are into it for reasons of transcuriosity or that they're simply into being forced to do things.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:02 AM
6

i'd agree, but i'm not entirely sure what that implies overall. what do you think? members of both genders are forced to deal with harsh implications if they step outside their typical norms?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:42 PM
3

i think you're onto something too. my own assertion can easily be over simplified. all i can be certain about is the idea that boys are ridiculed strictly for being more girly, and that this has anything to do with misogyny, is just absurd.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:39 PM
235

I say it every time...boys are not looked down upon for adopting feminine appearances, they're looked down upon simply for rejecting the male appearance. Thy could adopt the appearance of a hawk and they'd still be ridiculed for rejecting the male standard. It's about what they're rejecting, not what they're adopting.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:33 PM
1

nice work.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:27 AM
1

i'm not going to lie, the "boys to men" derisive comments were pretty amusing. the protesters were still completely in the wrong, but i had a good chuckle at those particular comments.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:46 AM
7

end the draft.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:31 AM
3

oh that's very nice. it looks like it'll attempt to download any YT video in as high definition as possible.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:48 AM
6

how so?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:40 AM
2

also, http://www.reddit.com/r/SRSsucks/comments/14afxj/important_the_warren_farrell_video_is_at_risk_of/
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:29 AM
2

personally, i use a program called jdownloader. you enter the url you're interested in capturing and it grabs the flv file of the video which is playable in VLC media player on your computer.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:28 AM
14

folks, download copies of the video yourself for future re-uploading. there's no shortage of ways to do it, ask if you're unsure how.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:25 PM
1

i'm not so sure about that. if shaming of every and any type is off the table, ok, but is that what you're saying?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:06 PM
1

Fair point. I'd just personally see both continue to exist, and people get over their exaggerated anger over people posting shots of folks they think are attractive.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:19 AM
2

God its just the epitome of cringeworthy.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:18 AM
0

/Gentlemanboners exists...
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:05 AM
1

Please post that to /r/cringe.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:05 AM
1

ha, i feel 16 again. nice.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:40 AM
0

not rape, just really inappropriate.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:39 AM
1

no worries. it's a great post.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:33 AM
1

intimately...
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:32 AM
3

thanks, i try once in a while. so what's your position in all this. you seemed pretty hostile higher up the comment chain, not very interested in this type of subject matter. that not the case entirely?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:31 AM
0

but i want to.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:23 AM
4

Alright, here is a follow-up question for you (which I thought was assumed from the get-go, but maybe it'll help if I spell it out): you were asking something entirely different, don't know why you're making such assumptions. Why is marriage a bad deal for men, and why do you feel as though they give up too much for it? again, not my position, but rather the position of others here. enough of them that it's common knowledge for any regulars. those who assert that tend to say the bias in favor of…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:22 AM
0

i would hope not. you're better than that.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:11 AM
6

That's borderline paranoid insane nonsense yes and no. if you really want to debate that find someone else as it's not a point i personally assert. that's just my reading of the image. as for why it would be appreciable...for the same reason it's appreciable anyone points out X is risky/bad/dangerous/etc. do i need to spoon feed you logic here? do you ask "why?" when someone thanks others for doing something for them?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:09 AM
2

like a good little gay really?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:05 AM
0

really? any confirmations of brigading yet? i've been a bit distracted the last week or so.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:05 AM
1

this MIGHT be what they're thinking of. even if not, it touches on the same issues and is eye opening... http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/hvv2m/i_work_for_a_large_multinational_tech_company_i/
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:59 AM
1

amazing how we're downvoted, isn't it? wonder who's invading...
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:58 AM
4

i honestly don't. taking it the way i took it, she's admitting that marriage as it exists is a bad deal for men, that they give up too much for it. i take it as a warning.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:54 AM
3

i didn't say "isn't for men", i said "isn't great for men".
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:16 AM
2

true enough.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:47 AM
-1

my sentiments exactly bud. i'm sorry, but at some point you have to own up to your own desires. society sure as hell isn't just pressuring women, it pressures everyone. i don't see us jumping to address that everywhere else.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:26 AM
1

go Fox!
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:14 AM
1

ugh, check the other discussions tab and see how /2xc is discussing this...the two comments already up jump right to the idea that women lack agency and are only making these decisions due to bias and societal pressure, and that such things NEED to be addressed immediately.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:03 AM
48

Isn't the aunts commentary somewhat appreciable though? Isn't she saying marriage today isn't great for men?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 10:10 PM
1

I read all 100+ comments then just replied to your nearest comment.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 09:34 AM
1

Which quote are you referring too?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:53 AM
1

Please elaborate, as I don't think that's an accurate portrayal of his writings.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 08:42 AM
34

what the fucking fuck! why is that even a problem? why is THAT a reason for anything?!
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:05 AM
4

Financial hardship you say? Sorry to hear friend. Seriously though, I read the source material, things have been taken way of context. Everything else these protesters are spewing is just emotional extensions of that original spin.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 10:43 PM
5

your trolling has really gone downhill in recent months. what's the deal? issues at home?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 09:10 PM
14

Wait, why is that happening now? Was it hacked? EDIT: site appears to work normally unless you access it via a mobile device with mobile formatting turned on. Still weird.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:21 AM
29

I thought you were just joking about the war thing. Checked. Now I can't stop laughing.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:19 AM
2

It's all bunk. Total bullshit. Writers like this need to die a horrible death.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:14 AM
3

Isn't McG a big movie producer?
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:12 AM
8

difficulties still abound though. those receiving the child at the safe haven location may not question things, but authorities acting on behalf of the mother attempting to locate the child for her will pursue the father for questioning, and most people really can't sustain that process. eventually most men will share where they dropped off the baby, it'll be returned to the mother, and the father will be both denied access and assigned child support payments. this is certainly interesting and w…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:59 AM
3

There's nothing to celebrate here. Those leggings and that handbag DO NOT match.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 08:00 AM
2

just want to remind everyone that whatever your thoughts are on Venker's recent comments/writings, do recall most of us have praised her in the past, and she has done some great work to move things forward in exactly the way we'd hope for. she was coauthor of "The Flipside of Feminism" and is willing to publicly say things like http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6t0O-iV8KBI
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:09 AM
1

patriarchy.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:58 AM
1

makes me want to burn this motherfucker to the ground. or enjoy my life knowing most people don't know, nor give a shit about, people like amanda marcotte. can't decide.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:54 AM
0

very interesting. god i hate social media.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:00 AM
10

well done Mint...
/r/MensRights28/11/12 10:38 PM
4

would be a better analogue if it was Berry who did the beating.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 02:01 AM
-3

Hair's gross, even on men. EDIT: My ticket for the 7:30 troll train has been revoked.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:24 AM
1

the url didn't take when I posted this reddit only lets you post link submissions OR text submissions. if you post a link in the URL box but then enter text in the text box (NOT the headline/title box) reddit will void whatever is in the URL box and default the submission into a text post.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:52 PM
0

Most HR people haven't even looked over your resume come time to interview, let alone Google you.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:46 PM
1

I like to ask this of every urologist...in those instances, do you have a preferred sperm bank you like to work with, or do you have the patient handle it entirely?
/r/MensRights25/11/12 08:10 AM
5

Ya can't persuade the indoctrinated and stupid.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 07:19 AM
10

It could probably stand to be brought up with more direct focus. Consider submitting an expanded writeup and I'm sure it'd be well received. Could even be sidebar worthy if well cited.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:51 AM
1

Even if we could agree most men do like that, I'm here for those who don't. It seems pretty valid, to me, to get up in arms about holding everyone of a gender to certain expectations.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:45 AM
3

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/08/16/the-gender-pay-gap-is-just-so-over/ credit to /u/firex726 and this is far from the only article to come to this conclusion. articles arriving at the same end have appeared in the wall street journal, fox business, the economist, etc. EDIT: oh, and this one http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/04/16/its-time-that-we-end-the-equal-pay-myth/ credit to /u/ullere
/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:48 PM
10

Someone please find the Forbes article from this past year that layed out how women are paid less due to their choices of employment.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:09 AM
3

Nah, you're fine. Just be nice to everyone who hasn't harmed you. People forget being a gentleman was as much about how men treated other men as it was about how men treated women.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:30 AM
21

yeah. tumblr is for idiots and social justice losers warriors.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:42 AM
1

some do, some don't. take it to /r/jelqing.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:16 AM
23

you silly, they're doing that because men make them do it. patriarchy, duh!
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:34 AM
29

why is a coalition on violence even referencing prostitution as a whole?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:08 AM
3

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b48_1305790944
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:06 AM
3

i think they're crass, but perfectly acceptable and to be expected. people often overemphasize the action of something to highlight an aspect of it. i'm equally unbothered by phrases like "that test just killed me", "that comedian just owned my ass", and in context of about to be in trouble "i'm gonna be fucked/i'm so fucked/i'm fucked". they're all the same thing and completely innocent expressions.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:58 AM
1

i hear ya. i still say they, mostly, warrant their price points, whereas the LFA really doesn't. it's a 150k-200k car by all metrics, but is enjoying a nice brand boost being pushed by Lexus execs.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:44 AM
1

they're that, in addition to being some of the most finely tuned and spec'd 4-wheel machines on the planet. not every model recieves the same amount of attention to detail and focus on performance, but by and large lambos and ferraris have earned their status-symbol position with a history of contributing to the evolution of the automobile and engine.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:41 AM
4

you might like this http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b48_1305790944
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:13 AM
1

i'm so glad i'm never having kids. to rear any at this point would be cruel given what's to come. and that references more than just the social turmoil. hopefully i'll be dead before we start to go to war over water.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:04 AM
3

oh for the love of fucking god. it's not bad enough the idiots behind "The Assembly for Justice" chose shitty, meaningless majors...now they want to force everyone else to share in their misery? “Although I can understand why some people might not like this idea because it adds more requirements, I think it would be a nice way to bring all the colleges closer together,” Nojima said. “The way the University is currently set up means that [College of] Arts and Sciences students probably won’t be i…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:49 PM
2

where do you live?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:14 PM
6

from the comments section... First wave feminism blamed all women's problems on men Second wave feminism blamed all the World's problems on men Third wave Feminism blames all of men's problems on men.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:13 PM
2

ha, this has also been posted in /r/srscanada.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:06 PM
2

i don't think you understand. obama just proved class/gender/race/etc warfare works. democrats, nor republicans, have any reason to avoid such dirty political hackery and namecalling any longer. we'll be seeing a lot more of these false accusations of "....ist".
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:08 PM
2

alright i'll allow it.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:05 PM
2

why anyone would get an LFA over a lambo/ferrari/similiar i'll never understand. great looking car, but not worth that price point. certainly not given the other options that exist.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:36 PM
-12

I like how the child is HER child, but if the rapist were trying to avoid child support it would be HIS.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:47 AM
4

ask /r/incest.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:42 PM
16

it's pretty amazing what things they lump together.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 06:16 PM
2

gonna edit in this one http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/13dscy/toronto_police_disrupt_antisexism_rally_at/
/r/MensRights18/11/12 06:58 AM
0

link to that thread please?
/r/MensRights18/11/12 06:48 AM
7

it's a reference to the complexity of sexual interaction, specifically when one party feigns resistance for dramatic effect, and how such things make rape prosecution uniquely difficult.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 06:47 AM
1

AMA! AMA!
/r/MensRights18/11/12 06:44 AM
2

haha, dammit, you're absolutely correct. i commented on that new rule in the meta sub about how mods will need to be vigilant because many will forget this new rule...and now i've done exactly what i warned of. egg on my face. mods, please delete this thread or let me know what edits would have it fall in line with the new rule.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:41 AM
7

anytime you're interested in more discussion regarding a specific link, check the "other discussions" tab up above. it has a "(3)" in it, meaning 3 other instances of the same link exist on reddit.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:39 AM
1

I wouldn't have had enough self restraint. Bravo to those who do.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:24 PM
-2

What a bitch/dick.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 06:45 AM
1

ha, and subbed.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 05:51 AM
1

well now i have to know, which sub did you intend to post in?
/r/MensRights15/11/12 05:36 AM
3

OP is a troll.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 05:30 AM
5

why is it not really the same? A lot of people think of video games as an exclusive club, and women don't really belong in that club i'm sure some do that. many others think video games is an exclusive club that should only be open to elite real true hardcore gamers, whoever those are. again, morons being morons. most rational people aren't like that at all. at the very least i'd want to see some data on how many people act like that before painting the entire community like that. it's unfair ot…
/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:27 AM
13

i'm convinced that's not an accurate generalization. are some male players anti-female? i'm sure some are. but, i happen to believe many more are merely immature asshats who will harass anyone and only uses anti-women language against women because they know that cuts. they'd apply the same logic to blacks, white trash, overt Christians, etc. basically, many of these people who are considered evidence of anti-female sentiment among gamers are really just general assholes who know how to press bu…
/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:19 AM
15

Not to mention most video games are anti-female. i'd like more elaboration on this point if you could.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:06 AM
23

it's things like that which cause others to roll their eyes when people make accusations of sexism.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 11:56 PM
-1

hmmm, could you elaborate a bit further on what you're looking for?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 10:24 PM
3

woah, that's not sexy. No-one really wants hi-definition in the bedroom. sales figures for HD pornography suggests otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 10:20 PM
2

he/she should really lay back next to something like this for the desired effect.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 10:07 PM
3

why is there SOOOO much time in between your comments over the last 2 years?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 10:01 PM
3

haha. most of them are. i majored in costume design and special affects in college. it's all about the lighting really.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:58 PM
3

/r/penis (NSFW!)
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:48 PM
3

don't try to hide it, you secretly consider yourself an MRA too.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:43 PM
5

you do that sometimes.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:40 PM
-1

I've already made it. You're misconstruing a liberty for a right because you think it has to be called a right. You've done nothing but repeat yourself in response to that argument. You also started downvoting me simply because I have a different opinion than you. Basically, you're a hack.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:01 PM
2

Oh, my mistake. I thought you were interested in having an honest discussion/debate.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:56 PM
5

That can still be the assertion without mislabelling it a right.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:39 PM
4

The problem there is that "right" is so broad and overreaching that it could cover anything...a right to life would guarantee access to any and all forms of medical care that could possibly exist...that's impossible and absurd. Right to life is nothing more than a platitude that really ends up meaning nothing.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:32 PM
7

for so many reasons besides the narrow focus on women's rights, the UN has a serious credibility issue. they clearly don't understand the underlying philosophy of what makes certain things rights and other things privileges.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:15 PM
1

good point. i knew more W voted than M, but i thought the percentage difference was enough to overcome the net difference in voters. certainly could have been wrong. this election was so damn crazy from an analysis perspective...
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:58 AM
1

got a source on that? i could have sworn the percentages suggested more white men voted for romney than white women.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:23 AM
3

that's not entirely accurate. white married women broke for romney, while white single women broke for obama. and a greater percentage of white single women voted than the percentage of white married women.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 02:54 AM
1

True enough though this is less an issue of political appeal and more one of potential blackmail of a top security officer.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 07:47 AM
6

exactly. they posted that story and then never commented in the thread, nor ever again. just raises my suspicions a bit.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:57 AM
3

tread lightly. that user's comment history makes me suspicious.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:39 AM
8

I can assure you, this is not a male only thing. A female CIA director would have also been expected to step down.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 12:09 AM
3

Oh sure. We really do need to clarify doxxing then. I thought doxxing was the act of connecting someone's username and online identity to their real life identity. Does it also now include the real life ID of non users? Am I doxxing my marriage counselor if I share her business phone number in a /relationships thread because I want others to know how wonderful she was and to make use of her services? I'll message an admin and try to find out.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 12:02 AM
4

Oh I didn't mean it like that nor for malicious purposes. Though, this raises a question...I see contact info of professionals listed often on reddit, is that allowed or not allowed?
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:36 PM
3

ahhh, yeah didn't mean for that to be the perceived tone. i'm fine with a costume or outfit catering towards audience appeal. i think it should be expected in most forms of media and not a source of regular frustration. my only point was it's silly for certain types to get frustrated by that catering when it's coming from female characters and for those same people to ignore the fact that male characters similarly cater to physical appeal. both genders get depicted like that, and it's totally fi…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:33 AM
2

certain types like to pretend only female swole is liked and objectified. i wanted to point out many of us happily admire the swole of women AND men. do you REALLY want others having the power to tell you whose swole to admire and not?
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:19 AM
4

Think of what happened as similar to hot chicks who like to wear tube tops slamming someone saying that attire in a movie was offensive to women. ok, but i'm not slamming the look. just the contrary, i'm highlighting it as part of reality that some people like to pretend doesn't exist. thanks for the info though.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:15 AM
2

I checked out the related tab of the /movies post to see what kinds of discussion were taking place about the photo ahh, i do the same. good way of finding stuff. when I noticed your swolehate comment. you misunderstand what i was saying completely. swole rules. hemsworth isn't swole enough.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:06 AM
1

I do, and we're not there yet. But also note the inclusion of gas, as in natural gas. We'd be fools to not make use of the reserves we have of NG.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:28 AM
2

it just means they tagged your username in a program some people use in conjunction with the reddit website. the only real affect is your username will be highlighted anytime they see it in the future in a comments thread. that only displays when they're logged in though. no real affect.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 04:20 AM
0

you americans are far too uptight and worrisome when it comes to sex. rape just because the parties involved were of different ages? that's just absurdity.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 04:17 AM
0

whoever wrote that REALLY needs to hold on to their monopoly of being objectified.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 03:43 AM
3

Seriously. I feel her look finally matches her persona.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:11 AM
2

yeah, this is the redesign. and this was what the costume was going to look like in the now shelved WW tv show from this year. I just think magnitudes are important because a sleeveless piece of armor and a thong isn't equal. probably not, but a thong on a female and a bulging crotch on a male are. have you seen the latest superman, wolverine, nightwing, etc? i'd have to shove two tube socks down my pants to achieve the same effect.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 11:33 PM
2

unlike the majority which is like wonder womans, which is just barely practical and focuses completely on sexual characteristics. you mean the latest revision of WW's costume that has her wearing pants and a jacket? Just don't pretend it's even close to how extreme female costumes have been. i don't really care about magnitude, it doesn't change anything. when people want to talk about magnitudes they just want to play oppression olympics. my point is to highlight that both genders are objectifi…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:50 PM
0

You see skin tight costumes on both genders of super heros. that's correct, but certain groups only ever complain about that with regards to female superheroes. they act like tights on men isn't the same as tights on women. that narrow-mindedness is what bothers me. I think its called Skyfall or something. yeah, Skyfall. not looking forward to it? i'm not terribly familiar with the source material...are they really screwing it up with the new film?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:42 PM
0

my mistake, i meant female. typically, certain types will suggest only female superheroes are assigned costumes that are designed to show off their physicality, often times at the expense of realism. this upcoming movie costume demonstrates that practice is not exclusive to one gender.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:40 PM
-5

the basis or justification for the costume isn't really the point. i'm sure you've heard the rationale behind skintight leotards on female characters, afterall. the point is to have a prepared counter when someone attempts to claim only male female superhero costumes highlight physical attributes. but atleast they won't fuck up this movie like they did to Bond. the one coming out this weekend or just the latest ones in general?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:02 PM
0

so brave.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:48 PM
1

one of you bigots?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:39 PM
-1

it was a comment by one of your nzcirclejerk buddies/alts...you tell me.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:12 PM
-9

Obviously it's not exactly a practical costume, but in comparison to the crazy shit that female superheroes and fantasy characters wear, it's fairly restrained. At least it doesn't have a cut-out panel in the middle of the chest for easier stabbing. you're kinda making my point here. all you can muster is a difference in magnitude, not a difference in kind. fact is, both male and female superheroes are given silly costumes intended to highlight physical attributes, or in some instances allegianc…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:09 PM
0

nice.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 08:24 PM
-3

the /movies link
/r/MensRights07/11/12 08:23 PM
-3

Haha, this is how you spend your free time. Not with friends, not with family, but figuring out the dumbest ways you can troll a subreddit. You're pathetic and you know it.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 04:28 PM
7

Link to any of the publicized articles that prove the wage gap isn't due to discrimination.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 02:07 AM
1

you may want to consider visiting the makeup subreddit, /r/MakeupAddiction, and ask them for any advice on how to dull your looks. i wish you didn't have to do that, but competitiveness and pettiness unfortunately exist the world over.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:47 PM
2

i wanna date.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 03:12 AM
7

i wouldn't even care if you were futrelle, just keep comedic gold like that coming.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:37 AM
12

I think we first need to establish something...what country are you from? It's important to know because that may be the biggest source of confusion since many of us hold our views towards feminism in a near-exclusive first world context. Otlutside of that context, things are very different and "feminism" can be much more legitimate.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 11:47 PM
33

My sentiments.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 09:42 PM
2

troll harder dork.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 07:53 PM
9

AADworkin is the head of the SRS/fempire. she mods /womensrights. she berates /mensrights for daring to exist. AADworkin, while also being crazy as fuck, is a complete hyopcrite. this also means AADworkin thinks that video somehow supports her view of the world since she hasn't removed your posting of it. yet.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 11:56 PM
8

AADworkin mods that sub...
/r/MensRights03/11/12 10:55 PM
1

I also share this belief with you. i'm going to ask you this as well then...how do you reconcile your belief that a fetus is a child and fully actualized human, with your advocacy of choice? how do you get past the issue that you're essentially condoning the murder of children for the sake of convenience to the parent?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:16 PM
3

not to sidetrack, but people like you confuse me most of all. i don't see how you can believe a fetus is indeed a child and human being, but advocate for abortion as a choice. you're condoning the murder of humans for the sake of convenience. how can you do that?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:14 PM
10

Assuming you are, why are you against female genital cutting?
/r/MensRights01/11/12 05:34 AM
85

ha oh you REALLY need to followup with your IT people and report back.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:54 AM
8

i'm not following very well.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:46 AM
12

I think you need to show her while SOME misogynists gravitate towards the MRM, the community is generally not like that at large. Her concern is valid, but only barely and is most definitely the extreme possible outcome.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 01:04 AM
38

but...didn't that require they acknowledge misandry is a thing? we got them!!!
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:31 AM
4

Ha, that's a good point bud. Alright, don't do it. I probably wouldn't be of much use. Instead, any chance I could get a PM just explaining your angle in all of this? I'll keep it to myself. Between you being a half-troll/half-not troll here, banned from /srssucks, and modding what seems to be a false flag sub...well, I'm just stumped. Would love some perspective. HP can vouch for me if you're interested. Either way, I still like ya.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 11:03 PM
13

Yes, but only if you mod me in at /srsreallysucks
/r/MensRights30/10/12 10:13 PM
167

I like it. Shows me who's out of their damn mind without me having to ask.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 10:12 PM
2

i'd agree. and no, haven't had a chance. you want to do it? i think the question definitely deserves to be discussed.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 08:25 PM
11

never said it was an issue of rights. my implication was that it's only the MRM working to address these types of shitty situations. other groups within the gender debate are trying to entrench the shittyness of them.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 08:23 PM
6

Ahh thank you, I knew it was something, just couldn't remember what. Perhaps that traditionalism is the problem in that regard...ios school judges thinking women are sweet little darlings.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 08:17 PM
25

welcome to the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 07:33 PM
8

and basically you won't get slapped for saying "x" like you might in other places. since when was physical violence ever an appropriate response to speech? to your larger point...eh. the south does hold stronger to more traditional mindsets so it's possible feminism is less entrenched there. that said, isn't texas awful for men getting divorced? i just remember some stories about your state's particular alimony or child custody laws...
/r/MensRights30/10/12 07:31 PM
1

ha, great writeup. thanks!
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:53 PM
1

But the fact is, links to SRS and affiliated subs are banned, so now that should include r/communism. interesting idea at least. i doubt they'll be as antagonistic to us as SRS is, but we them declaring things like this the idea is at least valid.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:51 PM
1

StarTrekFan is good people in my book. that other mod, starmeleon, is fucking crazy.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:41 PM
2

i dare you to post this to /communism.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:36 PM
1

oh my god that is exactly what i've said in the past about my account! are you me? has the effort to hold up one always-present account expanded to two?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:36 PM
5

there's a significant amount of crossover between basic libertarian ideals and the goals of the MRM. now, others will suggest we can utilize the gov't to further our goals, and i won't disagree, but a dismantling of gov't power, as libertarians seek, would also further our goals.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:33 PM
2

Haha bud we've been discussing this all night already. Where you been? Sandy?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:13 AM
1

Sure thing. When you get the chance to vet them, let me know what you think. I can always do a more thorough search if those don't help.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:46 AM
2

On my phone right now, but these should get you started... http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~iversen/PDFfiles/LottKenny.pdf http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/files/60.Lott_.Suffrage.complete-25633.pdf http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=18&ved=0CFcQFjAHOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.econ.cam.ac.uk%2Ffaculty%2Faidt%2Fpapers%2Fweb%2FWomen_Suffrage.pdf&ei=sWaPUJTeFOScyQGX2oFY&usg=AFQjCNHxsN1feM19fMoVVGroAr7EFnS6wQ Those first two have the same authors, but a quick check shows they're not just t…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:39 AM
2

i'll give them a view. thanks.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 04:21 AM
2

hahahahaha oh god...that video...that guy...hahah.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 04:16 AM
3

well that's not cool. i certainly disagree with the conclusions of radical leftists and marxists, but their origins are pretty interesting. any way you could summarize for me your thoughts on how to objectively demonstrate SRS is indeed part of that radical left, and not some trolling circlejerk or such?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 03:56 AM
4

I will say that if you have a problem with some type of feminism then /r/communism is not the place to address that. hey that's fine. it's not the place. i'm cool with that. but you shouldn't be judging those who do wish to engage in that conversation elsewhere where it's more appropriate. EDIT: as an example, i'm now banned from /communism. why? because i'm an MRA who keeps discussion related to that out of /communism. MRA's specifically reject feminism yes and no. some do, some don't. most jus…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 03:52 AM
3

I'm convinced that it was women's vote that led to the expansion of government programs oh this is practically a given among political scientists. the data reflecting gov't expansion and the timeline related match up too perfectly. almost no one among political scientists questions the fact that women vote for greater gov't intervention far more than men do. it's really amazing what becomes apparent when you actually understand history as it played out, and not as it's been spun.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 03:47 AM
5

well i can appreciate honesty. that we will quite eagerly raise up women and oppress men why does your utopia require a bringing down of men? can't you just raise women to the same level? how exactly did /mr get involved? because that one disenfranchised user mentioned it here in the last day or so?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 03:43 AM
4

i like how you're brigading right back. now THAT is equality. The anti-sexist policy of /r/communism except that it's not sexist to take issue with feminism, or certain feminist sects. nor is it sexist to believe certain issues specific to the male gender are going unaddressed by the current predominant movement in the gender debate, and require new groups to do so. as an aside, given your username, what's your thoughts on how the star trek universe handles a topic like communism, or it's compet…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:52 AM
3

so forward thinking. i honestly can't see why more people haven't come around to your oppressive enlightened way of enforcing thinking. there's no point in hyperlinking to "/MR" if you're not going to use the right extension. this was started because new members of the community needed reeducation recent uptick in members, or just hadn't covered the subject in a while?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:47 AM
5

who normally can't accept that? SRS themselves?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:45 AM
1

early account time limitation? yeah, they should pass quickly if you stay active. and just in case you didn't know, when you make a submission, you can either do a link post, or self post. not both. if you enter a link into the link box reddit will automatically negate any text you enter into the text box. actually, it might be the other way around. shit, can't remember. either way, don't try to enter both text and a link. if you have a link you want to provide AND text, best to do just a text p…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:13 AM
3

There Their
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:10 AM
4

haha, i like how you're so hostile. sign me up for the revolution comrade!
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:09 AM
4

I'm somewhat convinced that feminism was invented by capitalists to undermine socialism, by making left-wing politics all about priviledged women complaining rather than working men getting stuff done. oddly enough i've come across a couple of conspiracy theory-type suggestions that feminism was a ploy by capitalists to drastically increase the available workforce, thereby reducing necessary wages. certainly interesting food for thought.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:07 AM
1

probably better to just copy/paste this text into a new post in that sub. crossposting is the act of linking directly to a sub other than the one you're posting in.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:43 AM
2

poe's law. for me at least.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:34 AM
1

i think we'd love you over at /r/libertarian if you're interested.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:32 AM
-1

have an upvote you counter-pointing SOB.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:27 AM
4

do they have a stock response for those MRA's who claim to not be anti-feminist and believe feminism and men's rights activism address two sides of the same coin? as you know more than most, many MRA's are indeed accepting of feminism, long as it isn't of the extreme or radical variety. and overall, i'm not surprised. i expected they'd be like that. but now i'm left wondering what spurred THEM to make this so public and official now.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:32 AM
5

consider me late to the party then comrade. it appears they've taken extra steps in the past day or so to cement their position and align themselves as decidedly anti-MRA and men's rights. the alteration of their banner to a /SRS-style image, and those three seperate posts, especially the one calling out MRA and equating them to nazis, just further that cementing.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:22 AM
3

ha, i just posted about this too. so much for free association.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:16 AM
-9

why are /communism mods so obsessed with using "shitlord"? do they honestly think that helps differentiate them from /SRS or something? was that a Marx-approved term? i must have missed it's regular mention in the Manifesto. doesn't roll off the tongue as much as other communist terms do...
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:00 AM
26

Now that right there is a loser.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 11:33 PM
-8

i think you're seeing the real life application of marxist thinking here. that shit sounds nice on paper, and might work if people weren't so varied, but in reality it's only feasible by forcing people to think a like. you might want to take this opportunity to reconsider how it makes sense to you. if you still want to subscribe to a sub like that, i'm sure there are less extreme communism/marxist subs out there.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:31 PM
6

genius!
/r/MensRights29/10/12 01:39 AM
1

if this doesn't get much traction, consider reposting tomorrow afternoon/evening when traffic is higher.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 01:20 AM
15

HAHAHAHAHA. HAHAHA. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. HA.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 01:15 AM
1

Me too. Help I'm even on a first name basis with Aerik. At least, I call him a first name. Usually Sally. Anyway, I go there too occasionally.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:27 PM
2

i believe the rate of increase itself saw a major boost after the doxxgate drama because that amazing post by shady8x on circumcision got featured in /bestof and made the frontpage.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 05:48 AM
7

/SRS REGULARLY brigades /2xc. they do it under the guise of countering our supposed brigades there.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:07 AM
3

it'll be nice to see the results further refined.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 02:28 AM
2

agreed. nice to see some stats and info on it. seeing "/mensrights" about a dozen times amongst 75 comments doesn't hurt either haha.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 02:28 AM
1

I would LOVE to see some of your work. Any willingness to share a link or something? I'll understand if not of course.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 10:38 PM
1

I don't entirely disagree. Just beyond tired of the double standard.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 07:42 PM
0

Time out! In front of the camera or behind it?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 07:36 PM
1

consider also asking /askhistorians. i'd have my doubts too.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 02:07 AM
2

no worries. btw, i'm loving /srssucks.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 01:27 AM
2

Oxygen, a very female-oriented channel, for those wondering.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:59 PM
3

i have to point out, the only reason she's managed to avoid the sexual offender registry is because she plea-dealed out of it. i haven't checked the statutes to confirm, but chances are her jurisdiction considers asymmetrical power dynamics of certain relationships, such as teacher/student, to warrant sex offender status, even when the victim is above the age of consent technically.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:58 PM
2

i was multitasking heavily this morning when i made the post and that label was the first to come to mind. given that i was trying to express the fact that she only narrowly escaped having to register as a sexual offender, by copping a plea, and would generally be considered a sexual predator were the genders flipped...what term would you have used?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:54 PM
5

god i wish you'd post more often.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:28 PM
7

so is just answering a question.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:27 PM
13

You keep trying to tell us what being a man means. Stop it.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:49 PM
4

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on the framing of the situation.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:56 PM
10

Why is it jerky when something doesn't work out? When one tries something to see if they can handle it?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:45 PM
7

I'm not seeing the "jerk". Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:25 PM
51

Time to go to a dept head. Now.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:50 PM
3

What state are you in?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:05 PM
2

I'm a collector.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:57 AM
5

I would like to have your username when you're done trolling with it.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:25 AM
2

oh yeah! happened late last week after i made my case to the admins. i've been meaning to do a writeup about it since a few are curious but i traveled back from vacation with the wife this weekend and it took longer than expected. hope to get to it tonight/tomorrow, then back to my former posting frequency after this month. last couple months of the year are always extremely busy for me...market's just crazy this time of the year.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 11:02 PM
2

i prefer colorful and varied mail. it's like there's always a fabulous surprise awaiting me in my mailbox.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:58 AM
-2

POW!!!
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:45 AM
18

That should really tell you all you need to know about the American mainstream media and their biases.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 12:27 AM
22

god dammit michelle...
/r/MensRights22/10/12 11:26 PM
1

i did. it happened sometime in the last 36 hours unfortunately and i'm still trying to figure out what the cause was. i have a message out to the admins request a review and reconsideration if possible, or at least a note on why. we'll see how it goes. thanks for approving the comment, that appears to be the only way for mine to show up. i'll try to not post under this account until things are resolved though, just to lessen the burden. i've been 3 of the top 5 most active posters here in /mr fo…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:39 AM
2

Before I respond in full, confirm for me you're receiving this reply.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 01:18 AM
1

MOTHERFUCKERS! can you still get my message replies like this one? i'm going to contest it but do you have ANY ins with an admin?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:17 AM
3

can't say i see the issue here, let alone the men's rights issue. people who doxx others should face the consequences. the agentorange individual has doxxed users, if i'm not mistaken, so it only makes since for admins to do something about their accounts. no? shadowbanning is also a toss up for me. it can be annoying i'm sure, and i'd prefer users who are shadowbanned get a notification of it, but at least when SB'ed you have access to all your saved posts and any other data you were storing on…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:12 AM
1

doxxallthethingsmeme.jpg
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:05 AM
0

Not sure, but I have a tumblr account dedicated to me but it only has one post.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 11:13 PM
17

i'm just blatantly repeating myself for the karma now, but i say this every time it comes up... no one thinks women are weak as much as modern feminists do. they truly have the gold medal in thinking the lowest of women's abilities, capabilities, and sense of self.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:36 PM
5

And I thought Batman was ridiculous even when I was ten. blasphemy!
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:33 PM
4

what's got you so on edge lately?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:12 PM
2

what about report? sometimes i want to report so the mods can just remove the trash, but other times i want to let the community enjoy downvoting the trolls.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:25 PM
8

if i have to wait another 2 years until i can buy cigarettes or pornography, then i think YOU can wait till you're also 18 to have parts of your genitals permanently severed.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:24 PM
2

i always hate this part of being a doctor... i'm sorry to have to be the one to tell you, but you're an idiot. you were born an idiot, have grown up an idiot, and, short of some miraculous new treatment being developed in the near-future, will likely die an idiot. but there's some good news! while we can't cure your idiocy, we can minimize the symptoms...all you have to do is keep your mouth shut from now on and stop talking/posting/communicating. you'll still be an idiot, but far less people wi…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:21 PM
5

real names, social media accounts, and places of employment/university's attending and real world contact info for most of them. no SSN's. and i hear you. you've made some good points elsewhere in this thread as to what is damaging and what is really damaging.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:49 PM
2

We're witchhunting Adrian Chen and Gawker, not SRS.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:33 PM
4

That was just dumb. Nuff said.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:29 PM
12

I agree with him that doxxing shouldn't happen, which is why I haven't doxxed anyone.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:10 PM
21

There's info. It was compiled by a number of different users over the last year or so and has passed hands a few times. I believe someone sent some of it to Ig at one point, but he disregarded it. It started as an informal challenge amongst some users, but once it became clear certain SRS members are willing to dox others and move this into the real world someone decided it best to have some insurance and a response.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:02 PM
27

I'm actually the one holding that info at this point. No one on that list has stepped over the line so its stayed private and will remain so unless things change. It's release would be purely defensive/retaliatory.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:15 PM
9

what an awfully designed website.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:57 AM
25

Any links to formal declarations of other subs joining this effort?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:03 AM
5

Elaborate?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:01 AM
7

I'm technically a mod, but of subs that are basically defunct/in pre-planning. Can I learn more about the private mod sub?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:00 AM
1

Where'd you go for 11 days?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:20 AM
1

i'm BEGGING you to paste that link in a PM to the user who posted the original screenshot, and tell them to pass along the request for an address so the person who originally posted it to facebook can live up to the big talk online.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 11:31 PM
1

He also likes the Big Bang Theory. wow wow wow...BBT is pretty amusing.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 11:30 PM
31

feminists are sooooo not violent. link to the source... http://www.reddit.com/r/SRSWomen/comments/115wbn/my_friend_made_me_lol/ link to the user who posted it... /u/Dreamstress
/r/MensRights09/10/12 04:01 AM
9

what's "weird" is subjective. your perspective is incredibly american-centric (as uncut is far more common outside of the US), immature (mature adults are not supposed to judge others on such aesthetic differences), and weird (seriously, are you showing your dick to everyone on the street?).
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:11 AM
11

it's not exactly high on my totem pole of priorities, but the fact is there's simply no damn reason to do it anymore. add to that the fact that it's a violation of the baby boy's own bodily integrity because it's done without his consent...something we usually recognize as being abhorrent...and it becomes clearly wrong and something we should stop.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:53 AM
1

Well I would like to have children one day that's why sperm storage is a thing. and I haven't had any trouble with condoms or the women I date. that's nice. your experiences are not a universal representation of everyone else. please keep a more open mind. Maybe education needs to be fixed to ensure men have a greater understanding of what to stick their dicks into. not really possible, as pointing out some women are crazy is seen as "sexist". Also, vasectomies don't protect against STD's. which…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 05:19 PM
1

my pleasure. coincidental, i assure you. can you believe you're one of the few users to notice the double entendre of my name? most just assume it's related only to computer hardware. I was under the impression IVF cost like $30,000, good to know it's a lot more affordable than I thought. i must correct you just a bit here. IVF (invitro fertilization) is different from AF (artificial insemination). IVF is indeed still very costly, something like $15k-$30k, but that is because it's a much more de…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 05:14 PM
1

i prefer greater certainty.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 03:04 PM
2

it's going to vary depending on your state and even which sperm bank you choose to store at, but generally the per year costs range from $250-$500. there's a few additional fees typically assessed at the beginning of the process but even with those included you can store sperm for, say, 5 years for less than $2500. add on the vasectomy itself which in my area was between $600 and $800...though your insurance will very possibly cover that. lastly, the artificial insemination process if you choose…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 03:03 PM
1

Prenup and a vasectomy, with sperm in storage.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:47 PM
1

So keep responding with non-answers.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:36 PM
1

Riiight, because being called a rapist shouldn't make one defensive. Since you wish to still stratify consent, define "clear enthusiastic consent". This may be best served by offering examples of what physical or verbal expressions satisfy it. Bonus points if you offer an example of expression you feel most would think qualifies as consent but you personally don't believe does.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 05:42 AM
1

Funny, that's the same age I'd peg you given your complete lack of understanding of sexual nuances. Us mature individuals understand consent is expressed in a myriad of ways, and that people like you just look to dictate to others how to live their voluntary lives.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:59 PM
1

You treat women like children and believe they're incapable of properly expressing themselves unless they do so in the fashion you desire. I really hope you work in those sexist beliefs one day.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:48 AM
1

You're assuming I'm failing to gain consent and calling me a rapist, and assuming the state of minds of the women I've been with. You're either a troll, arrogant prick, or naive boy. Either way, I'm done. Go enjoy dictating how people should act in the bedroom to others.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 06:04 AM
1

Please continue assuming the state of minds of people you've never met bigot.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:19 AM
1

You're okay with reluctant consent? why do you keep trying to stratify consent? consent is consent. fuck i'm 98% positive i'm talking to a 15 year old who's never been in a sexual relationship that lasted longer than 2 weeks. I'm not sure why it's unreasonable. I obtain that level of consent on a regular basis. when you date women outside of gender studies classes, women who aren't turned out by your persistent need to seek their reassurance and approval, you'll understand how entirely offputtin…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:51 AM
1

i think you require unreasonable degrees of expression of consent.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:37 AM
5

sexism, benevolence, stupidity, wisdom...none of it knows only one gender, and i'm not about to think only one gender can get it right or wrong.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 02:00 AM
1

who fucking cares who fucking cares?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 10:33 PM
0

Where did I say to actually do that?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:58 PM
3

can't say i disagree, just trying to be realistic too. look at the vote numbers. most of those biased entries are like 20,000 up vs 2,000 down. you'd need to organize a massive campaign here to adjust that to any significant degree.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:40 PM
7

just remember no one takes UD seriously and pathetic white knights and social justice warriors actually cared enough to organize a vote campaign there. that or get the mods here to run regular posts encouraging subscribers to go vote over there.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:35 PM
0

sounds good. i'll make a meta post come friday as a reminder.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:08 PM
-1

i'm renting quite a large place in your head bud. all for FREEEEEEE.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:00 PM
0

that's reasonable. would it be acceptable to include the link to the source within the self post text at all though? i normally like to at least cite my sources haha.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:59 PM
3

that's not inaccurate, and there's certainly a range of opinions about them. many, myself included, believe they've actually moved past being a harmless circlejerk and now actively promote their dogmatic way of thinking centered around social justice-warrior perspectives. each /SRS-X subreddit is supposed to be how they would operate a subreddit given the named subject material. in practice, i've always found these subs to be extremist.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:20 PM
3

/r/SRSwomen and /r/SRSDisabilities. they're part of the /r/shitredditsays community. if you're unfamiliar with /shitredditsays, i'd rather not say more at the moment, at least not until you visit them yourself and get a feel for them.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:15 PM
11

We don't need to lighten the mood and make a mockery of men's rights. i disagree. for one, those two things are not the same. one can bring reprieve from intensity to a thread without making a mockery of the movement or issues we're discussing. That's making the movement into entertainment, not activism. not taking the issues seriously is turning it into entertainment. it's entirely possible to take things seriously, but have room for playful banter and jokes.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 08:11 PM
6

AgentBeryllium has /srswomen and /srsdisabilities in their history, plus They get MRA butthurt. someone like that isn't worth your time.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 07:47 PM
0

Ok... replying here. ha, yeah sorry about that. It is a tough thing to judge. The community pretty uniformly was happy when we banned rage comics and meme images. They had been taking over submissions - so much so that there was a noticeable decrease in submissions and traffic after implementing the rule. Perhaps we can consider revisiting the rule. The idea of self-posts with descriptions and then links seems to be working okay for peripherally related subjects. Maybe it can be used for rage co…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 06:05 PM
1

interesting. perhaps that inconsistency is where the difference in opinion so many have of SB stems from. i can certainly understand it.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:53 PM
-1

scratch my other comment please, replying here will be fine. for future reference, how might one present content that is unfortunately in ragecomic form then? transcribe it into a text description? even then wouldn't it be prudent to link to the source thread, for context or even continued discussion material? i can agree with removing links directly to ragecomics, but can links to the submission threads about ragecomics still be permitted? or, at least, can self posts contain links to ragecomic…
/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:22 PM
21

i don't know about that... i often leave comments intended to lighten the mood and they're regularly heavily upvoted. most users have mentioned how important it is for the MRM to maintain a sense of humor, and that much of the trouble with feminists is their apparent lack of humor. certainly some of SB's comments have been...odd...lately, but until recently i never thought he/she was a troll of any sort. i was rather surprised when that point was being passed around the last week or so.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 04:58 PM
42

ya know, people keep calling you a troll, or a false flag attempt, or any number of other names, but dammit i just find your comments amusing and occasionally insightful.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 04:31 PM
-1

you're stalking me and linking to me directly over in /circlebroke. please stop, it's creeping me out amusing the hell out of me knowing how obsessed you are with me.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 04:11 PM
-1

also, /r/circlebroke is linking to this and everything related to it, including this submission... http://www.reddit.com/r/circlebroke/comments/10vmeq/welcome_to_effeminate_america_where_being_a_man/
/r/MensRights03/10/12 03:59 PM
1

But you are aware enough.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:02 PM
3

Any chance this is reddit's own violentacres?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 10:52 AM
1

I suspect so as well. It's the comments that most disturbed me.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:49 AM
5

Not sure if it's normal but its certainly shared.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 11:20 PM
2

A bridge? Because I highlighted the specific thread that's finally shown how far that sub has fallen? Go make your sub private already if you have that big of a problem with it being linked to. And yes the pure dismissal of MRAs needs to be corrected you bigot.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 10:46 PM
1

you're right. as a man, and an MRA to boot, i'm not supposed to be interested in women or women's issues at all...i always forget that though.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 10:14 PM
3

that's very unfortunate.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:51 PM
-2

respectable suggestion. i have the link there purely for context.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:50 PM
-3

you KNOW i have a history of defending that sub in much the way you're doing now, but i can't help but observe a recent shift towards the extreme in the last few months over there. i don't know if other subs have ramped up their attempts to influence /2xc or what, but MRA-bashing, dismissal of reasonability, and outright ignorance has taken serious hold over there lately.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:48 PM
0

good advice, but judging someone's level of inebriation can be difficult, even moreso if you are drunk.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:46 PM
1

you're an idiot, and the term "reasonable" means nothing to you.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:45 PM
-2

yeah the fact that they think that comment holds any weight tells me all i need to know about the collective intelligence of that sub.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:56 PM
1

you're disregarding the fact that not everyone sexes likes you, and instances of "in-the-moment". such question-asking and all becomes much more intrusive on the act when you're actually fucking. which, by the way, is when most confusion occurs, not in the leadup as you're referencing.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:47 PM
0

Legality issues abound...but its still very easy to do. A handful of motion-activated, wireless IP cameras feeding to an on-site NAS...easily doable for less than $1000. If someone was really on a budget, I could see a setup spec'ed for as little as $500, maybe a tad less even.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:44 PM
1

Please, write out, dialogue and scene descriptions included, how you think sex should go. EDIT: nevermind, don't bother. We fundamentally disagree on things and its not worth our time.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:23 PM
3

not that i personally agree with the theories, but the "what" you're looking for ranges. i've heard... -"double the available labor force, necessarily decreasing wages" -"disrupt the established family unit and replace it with a broken family sytsem wherein gov't takes on the ever-increasing role of provider, necessarily increasing gov't power" -"expand the available consumer base, leading to increased profits for industry-leading companies"
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:56 PM
1

oh i know, normally i'm in lockstep. it's always an interesting moment when i'm not.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:42 PM
2

i believe IG is saying the redditrequest is only to remove kloo's account from the mod list, not from reddit in general. i'm not even sure such a request can be made anywhere.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:41 PM
0

apparently. certainly wasn't expecting THAT comment to be so unfavorable....oh well.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:29 PM
-2

Harassment, to me, is a bullshit way to legislate speech. People need to be thicker skinned. yeah, can't say i disagree. EDIT: what the fuck downvoters?
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:50 PM
51

her opinion i could give a pass to, it's her spreading of rumors of OP and near-harassment that's the issue. that's bullying at least, and depending on OP's area, is taken seriously. also, schools and free speech haven't exactly been close friends for decades.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:34 PM
100

I think you may be better off speaking with your parents and school counselors. Her behavior, and that type of hostility, has no place in a high school. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:37 PM
13

Please, continue denying every subgroup has some privilege, it really does amuse us. Continue pretending male privilege is the only privilege and trumps all others. It just pushes more and more people away from your lunacy.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 10:54 AM
13

Privileges are an academically accepted concept. The conspiracy theory of "Male Privilege" is complete nonsense. Any half decent sociologist can tell you everyone has some sort of privilege over others, and attempting to contrast them is entirely political hackery.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 08:39 AM
1

what sub?
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:30 AM
1

What does he do?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:41 AM
3

This seems relevant. It receives some more indepth cover here. Google provides similar musings, just search "feminism and fall of civilization". Not sure if I buy into it all, but certainly interesting to think about.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:41 AM
3

Anything having to do with blanket forts has my FULL support.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:25 AM
1

Reddit doesn't allow users to make simultaneous link posts and text posts, only one or the other. If you enter a link, but then also enter text into the text prompt box it automatically voids any link you entered and forces the submission into a text post. Best work-around is to make a text post and just include the link prominently within your body of text. Or make a link post and quickly make a comment containing the text you wanted to include.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:02 AM
2

This is going to make my "/mr secret IRC channel" joke MUCH less funny... Nice work though Nillerz, and great writeup. I'll mention this only because I've seen it happen elsewhere...if someone is on the IRC channel claiming to be a /mr regular, take it with a grain of salt. It would be all too easy for someone to register a username that isn't also their reddit username. If the IRC channel takes off we may need to create a list of verified users or something.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 06:57 AM
5

i have the ever-increasing feeling this sub sends more and more people to /r/childfree every day. best of luck OP. take pride in your dedication to your children.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 01:35 AM
6

We post a list of targets daily on the secret /mr IRC channel.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:44 PM
2

/metanarhism has linked here and some late to the game are still downvoting all of us.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:38 PM
-1

My pleasure. Maybe you can take it over and improve it, as its pretty boring right now.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:35 PM
-1

Figured what the hell. And that /mrabrigade shit is hilarious.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:34 PM
2

whats your implication?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 05:08 AM
2

interesting. in the States it varies and depends on the available funds of the given school and town. i'm familiar with some schools that couldn't afford their own police force, so local town police or county police had to cover campus crimes, while other schools were able to afford their own police force that handled all on-campus issues.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 03:10 AM
1

my mistake. just to be clear, the local police handled the investigation of an incident that happened on a college campus within the jurisdiction? so it wasn't college resources that were wasted, but local municipality resources?
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:02 AM
2

that's a link to their "data" on sexual assaults and college campuses. the second quote comes from their Just For Men page. you'd think a page called that would be a resource for male victims, but not at all... http://www.crisisconnectioninc.org/justformen/default.htm
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:54 AM
5

i can second that. though i have to admit i appreciate some of the discussions sparked by some less-than-egalitarian MRAs.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:47 AM
19

you should contact your Dean of Students, or equivalent, office and ask why nothings been done about the false allegation. ask them if the university doesn't mind wasting resources on a lie.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:38 AM
-4

http://www.reddit.com/r/MRAbrigade/
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:33 AM
-1

they banned you?! christ that's absurd.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:28 AM
-2

also, http://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/10dnaf/my_friend_and_i_posted_these_on_every_mens/c6cppg1 someone there is really persistent that men are horrible.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 01:27 AM
0

i saw that. your comments were perfectly moderate and reasonable. they didn't agree with the predominant narrative so they had to go.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:47 AM
1

it may be my own failing, but i don't recognize your username, and the first few pages of your recent comment history suggest a lack of regular posting here in /mr. am i right? i'd like to see you post here more often...
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:45 AM
-1

http://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/10dnaf/my_friend_and_i_posted_these_on_every_mens/c6cp9xt for anyone wanting to see that specific comment... you had a very good response.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:37 AM
-3

these are subthreads i found interesting. i sort by "old", so you may want to as well to see what i'm referencing. http://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/10dnaf/my_friend_and_i_posted_these_on_every_mens/c6clbel http://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/10dnaf/my_friend_and_i_posted_these_on_every_mens/c6cmrzt http://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/10dnaf/my_friend_and_i_posted_these_on_every_mens/c6ctkme http://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/10dnaf/my_friend_and_i_posted_these_on_…
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:34 AM
1

didn't mean for it to be. just wanted to point out the other users i picked up on being anti-MRA.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:19 AM
1

i just can't let comments like If you actually care about gender equality, for christsake learn about actual feminism and equality. "Men's Rights" is to sexism as "White Power" is to racism. edit: just to be clear I'm a man and I'm a feminist, as feminism is for actual gender equality. I want to be a stay at home dad and not be afraid to express my emotions, for example, and not be criticized. Check out /r/SRSMen go. that type of ignorance needs to be highlighted. additionally, i count several i…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:27 PM
0

i'm actually rather new to the concept, so i'm learning on the go currently. i'd venture a guess that you're basically correct, but i've come across some ancaps whose attitude towards libertarians suggests there may be more of a split than i believe at the moment.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:50 PM
2

ha. i actually posted a thread to /anarcho-capitaism sometime this past month asking why the hell the average /anarchism user HATED ancaps so much. it's sad, really. anarchists have changed into something so unrecognizable these days. oh, and i really try not to visit that sub. i ended up there somewhat randomly following a bouncing ball...
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:33 PM
4

the entire thread is worth a read. lots of mental gymnastics and quick dismissal of actual eqaulity and MRA's...http://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/10dnaf/my_friend_and_i_posted_these_on_every_mens/ /r/anarchism, you're a lost cause.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 06:25 PM
1

Well then Poes law applies somewhat because I've honestly never thought they were a troll.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:03 AM
1

that's not giving me anything to work with. do you mean you suspect they're the type of troll that presents an overl-aggressive mindset? a pure oddball lunatic? what?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:32 AM
1

but in what way? elaborate, because i don't recall getting that impression of them at all.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:43 AM
1

but what type? my understanding was SB was a more traditionalist MRA.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:18 AM
1

wait, what is your perception of SB?
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:22 AM
62

I would like to hear more about this.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:59 PM
3

is your ex a fellow redditor?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:54 PM
3

the worst and most abusive trolls are normally deleted/banned within a few hours. the trolls who aren't that bad but just annoying or persistent...well, whatever. so they post comments that disagee with us? big deal. the only moderation those trolls need is community moderation via downvotes or replies.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:52 PM
9

Lawyer. Now.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:37 PM
1

Second that. Nothing like regaining control over your future in such a resolute way.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:04 AM
-2

Even though everybody in government is exactly like me, just older and fatter. all policitians care about are votes. you, as a man, are not a voting block. men don't really identify as a group like that. women do though. they vote as WOMEN, whereas men vote as employees, social justice warriors, conservative christians, etc. you're operating on fallacies troll. Oppression happens every where. no, discrimination happens everywhere. oppression doesn't exist in the first world. Think it'd keep me f…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:18 AM
-1

I have literally never been discriminated against because I'm a man cool story, bro. doesn't mean everyone else shares your experience or lack of experience. I'm a white, straight, tall, athletic, handsome man. I come from a wealthy family. How can I ever be oppressed? why are we talking about oppression? discrimination is the problem. oppression is a third world issue, not first world. furthermore...a white, straight, tall, atheltic, beautiful woman from a wealthy family would face the same lac…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:03 AM
0

feel free to point out where you redeem such an ignoran statement.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:50 AM
1

you would know. sorry, but when you can't even troll well enough to avoid saying I'm not playing the victim, I'm a guy. How can I ever be a victim? then i'm just not going to waste my time. you're a toll. you're a bad troll. you should feel bad.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:40 AM
7

annnnnndddddd TROLL. weak troll, in fact.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:29 AM
10

Daniel Jackson?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 09:21 PM
2

reread my comment. i was very specific. the more wealthy nations of the middle east this primarily refers to UAE, Kuwait, and one or two others. these countries are much less shitholes. christ, the only reason i knew i was in dubai and not something like LA was because of the heat and sand.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:15 AM
1

it's about finding the best option at this point. there is no place that fits your ideal, so you must weigh your pros and cons. i'm not an atheist myself, but firmly agnostic and apathetic about religion. in many ways i can even be anti-islamic more than anti-any-other-religion. i'm also all sorts of kinky and sexually progressive. i've still managed to have a hell of a time in the UAE because, while on the surface the place is very traditional and religiously-dominated, there's a very large and…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 06:22 AM
2

They have some of the world's highest divorce rates. do you have a link i can read up on concerning that? i wasn't aware... for what it's worth, sense we're looking at divorce rates now, aren't divorce rates among educated professionals relatively low even in the States? South American may be alright, though i'd avoid Brazil (they apparently have rising levels of prejudice against men, others can elaborate if need be hopefully). i personally like Ecuador, Nicaragua, and the Dominican Republic. I…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 05:56 AM
4

this topic comes up from time to time, and it's usually predictable what will be mentioned. i'm sur other users can predict what i'll say, as i've said it at least 3 times now... if you are an educated (employable), straight (or at least closeted and discrete) male, then few places will be as...oriented...to your demgraphic as the more wealthy nations of the middle east. there is no escaping this truth, just as there is no escaping the truth that this can only be realized if you're willing to be…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 05:32 AM
1

probably true. but Marshall should be able to press for a reason. if nothing of substance can be provided, i'm willing to rest on an educated presumption.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 05:11 AM
12

the sooner we can confirm one way or the other the reasons for termination, the better we'll be. if it was unrelated to the debate, we don't want to look like fools. if it was related, i want names and contact info of whatever sick individual thought it was alright to get someone fired, of whichever HR peson thought such a thing was grounds for termination, and of the company that isn't immediately overturning said HR person's decision. edit: someone post this to /2xc and /feminism
/r/MensRights22/09/12 04:09 AM
15

nor i. this is honestly one of the more open-minded...or disinterested...subreddits with regards to sex and sexual orientations i've ever come across.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:53 AM
29

time for a second trip to the cops to report the damages. don't accept "no" as an answer.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 01:05 AM
44

1) i suspect your friend was attempting to derail more serious issues by encouraging we focus on that, and subtly making the connection between us and irrational prejudices such as homophobia. 2) while i stand by 1, i'm also willing to humor it. before i do that though, i must ask your feminist friend if they feel transphobia and mra-phobia is sufficiently dealt with when it pops up among feminists? they, as a group, also tend to hate on woman who like filling traditional gender roles...will the…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 01:03 AM
116

Remember folks, you're mind readers.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:58 AM
1

Seems like you've taken the appropriate steps at this point in time. If things escalate on her end, itll be good you have a record of correspondence and legal consultation. Try not to let the paranoia get to you and just live your life.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 08:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter