I actually left a while ago and cleared all my posts, so you won't see any activity on my comment history, but I still check for interesting posts every once in a while. After seeing some of the latest posts that go against the movement, I think simply leaving and not saying anything isn't enough, so I'm posting my reason. I know I'm probably going to get downvoted for it.

I've posted on several men's rights sites, and am most active in a select few men's rights groups, but out of all of them, I have to say that this subreddit lacks the logic that other groups have. In fact, it's coming to the point that it's actually slowly turning into a feminist subreddit.

The first thing I noticed is that, unlike other men's rights groups, the people here need to have everything explained to them, rather than actually analyzing what they see. For the most part, they've barely been deprogrammed from feminist indoctrination, and still show clear signs of it. They've also aggressively defended companies that discriminate against men on numerous occasions, and occasionally defended social discrimination. Also, I've seen plenty of posts that go by the belief that systemized and industrialized misogyny really is as prevalent as feminists say, and that feminists are simply going by it the wrong way and that "nice feminists", or activists who don't associate with extremist feminists, are acceptable.

And of course, occasional posts that defend feminist beliefs. The thing that finally triggered my decision to leave was when a group of people, including self-identified MRAs, aggressively defended the "1 in 4" rape statistic, downvoting those who didn't support the notion and upvoting those who did.

After leaving, but still reading every now and again, I saw a post, which was perhaps the worse on the whole subreddit, that said that radfems were possibly neccesary in some parts of the world like India (citing a specific rape case, and by the way, one rape case, no matter how extreme, is not evidence that misogyny is prevalent), and received tons of support. In case you didn't read right, I'll say it again: there was a post that said that radfems were possibly neccesary in some parts of the world. It did not say "feminists", it did not say "women's rights activists", it said radfems. Radfems (radical feminists) are the very brand of feminism that wants to exterminate all men, or reduce the majority of the male population and leave the rest as sperm banks. Even if you go by the belief of "not all feminists are like that" - the radfems ''are'' like that. So in other words, the subreddit consented that in certain parts of the word, it should be acceptable to say men should be exterminated.

I'm not going to go into detail on every post I've seen, because that would be way too long, so I'm just mentioning the most interesting ones.

It seems to me, the people here don't actually read up on many men's rights issues. They just get information on what information interests them, as individuals, and then just acts like the typical white knight when faced with an a topic on an issue that doesn't interest them, or at least that nobody in thus subreddit has previously posted a topic about that they saw.

Recenly, I saw this post: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/18j6r8/because_i_am_a_girl/

The comments say there's nothing wrong with "Because I am a Girl", because they are apparently fighting real discrimination (and knowing the feminists in the west, I don't believe anything feminists claim without hard evidence). Of course, if anyone here actually read men's rights sites, they'd know full well that BIIAG is a corrupt organization trying to take the poverty issues of the third world and pretend they only effect women and girls, and they are pushing to have millions of boys in Africa circumcised.

So while other men's rights groups have the facts straight, the people in this subreddit are just a few blue pills away from being feminists.