TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

hostergaard Archive

View 2 posts and 212 comments by hostergaard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

They where more than happy to jump to conclusions when men where the accused but now suddenly they are all calling for people not to jump to conclusions. Bloody hypocrites.
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/22 05:40 PM
1

Yes! For example, I was subjected to the famous ink blot test, I was told afterwards that what you see is irrelevant, don't matter if it's a bear, butterfly or a dildo, what they where checking was what you where focusing on, where you looking at only part of the ink blot or the entire thing to form you mental image.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 08:42 AM
3

Jesus Christ that threat is so incredibly entitled and rapey, what happened to respecting peoples boundaries. Don't whine that you did not manage to coerce a guy into sexual acts he did not perform, take responsibility for you own sexual pleasure instead of expecting a guy to do everything. They are so desperate to play the victim, they even try to cover it up and say oh he did not tell me for so long. Excuse me? He does not have to tell you anything, you should have respected his boundaries fro…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 09:35 PM
6

It originally was developed by a woman, to describe herself Yes, which makes it even more ironic Also, my understanding of the history is that the "Incels"(people who identify as such, but can actually self-improve) came before Incel-as-slur. And it was through the ridicule of them that the word was popularized, as "Incels" tend to immediately develop rather awful and inaccurate ideas about women, even moreso once they're introduced to Redpill and they started developing blackpill ideas. Well, m…
/r/MensRights17/04/22 08:06 AM
19

Its actually the original meaning of the word, people who where unable to attract mates because of factors they themselves where unable to change. It's just that feminists could not allow men to be seen as victims in any way so they immediately set out to stigmatize the word and falsely associate it with entitled people who demands any and all women fuck them non matter what.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 05:50 AM
4

So, you are against equality and want double standard then? There is a difference. If I am single vascetomy only affects me and is a permanent decision. A child affects us both and is part of both our bodies. Furthermore, it'd also a mans body that you effectively enslave for 18 years but that does not seem to worry you. Why is that you only worry about the much lesser 9month women are facing but don't give a shit about the 18 years a man faces of enslavement. Again, if we use your logic then ab…
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/22 05:17 PM
4

So what you then imply is that consenting to sex is consenting to parenthood. Then it follows that abortion need not be legal (other than to save lives or rape) because women should be satisfied with having the same level of choice of just not having sex or sterilizing themselves if you believe that is a satisfactory level of choice to offer men. Or do you support inequality and double standards? Furthermore, you have yet to answer my question; where this men given the same choice and say in bec…
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/22 04:11 PM
3

Once pregnancy happened, where they given the same right and opportunity to abort the child, at least legally and financially if not in actual fact. Or more simply, was the child born because they freely wanted it, or was it against their will and forced on them by the mother unilateral choice to carry the child to term?
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/22 03:11 PM
12

How many of those fathers had fatherhood forced on them against their will?
/r/AntiFeminists11/04/22 02:03 PM
1

What do you mean no parole? I am not sure I understand what you wrote.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 09:09 AM
1

As I said, you figure it out, its you're own conundrum, not mine. When the punishment is done with it's done with. And how would you know anyway? For most crimes there is not a database that you can search. I do hold something against someone once their legal and just punishment have been completed. It's done with, I it would be immoral for me to enact my own punishments. And I have done so, in fact, in my family we sometimes pick up people who have been just released from prison and give them a…
/r/MensRights11/04/22 08:26 AM
2

Why should I? That is something you came up with, you figure it out. All I am saying is, when their punishment ends then that is the end of the story, they have done their time and it is deeply immoral and unethical to try and enact your own punishment. That is just evil for your own satisfaction.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 01:38 PM
2

But it should not matter what he is convicted of. That isn't relevant and should not have a say in the matter. He did his time, end of story, no one gets to take matters in their own hands after that. What he did is no excuse no matter what. Only thing that matters is what she did.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 12:29 PM
20

How could it possibly be more severe? The only more severe punishment we reserve for murderers, as it should it should be. You comment is nothing but virtue signaling, we should be better than virtue signaling here.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 12:33 PM
26

No, this should never happen no matter the crime, should be in jail and he should be able to sue her for a lot of money for this extreme dereliction of duty. He could have been killed by the mob.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 12:31 PM
12

Jada willfully took Wills will with Wills will just to abuse Wills will against Wills will.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 09:09 AM
1

Learning to read the room is why he has to escalate. The advice women gives means he will never experience anything, always escalating means you will try and fail a million times but the failures will give you the experience needed to succeed and read the room better
/r/seduction06/04/22 10:46 PM
5

Voting without draft. That is litterally the basis of feminism and the true story that they try to hide. Men had to register for the draft to vote, feminist wanted to be able to vote without the draft, but only for women, they where more than happy to send men to die in wars.s
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/22 07:56 AM
4

Figured as much, but maybe it would be a fun way to protest this bullshit.
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/22 07:02 PM
6

Bring a wig around with you. Put it on your head when you enter the bus, don't pay, sit on the reserved seats. Claim to be female and tell them not to question your identity if the question it. Watchs them have a meltdown.
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/22 05:05 PM
7

Well, its your feeling. I can't explain what you feel. But to take into account of men attacking your masculinity then tapperhets it useful to point that you have let your masculinity be defined by feminists, so it reflects their ideas and values which often stand in opposition traditional masculinity. As such its only natural that you would not be threatened by feminists whose ideas of masculinity yours reflect, while more often be in conflict who does not ascribe to said masculinity. ​ There i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 08:32 PM
16

Let me clarify. I suspect most of our grievances as men are the product of our own idiosyncrasies and undoing yet, somehow, we tend to blame women for pointing out those that affect them the most. I do not understand this logic. Do you suspect the same of female issues or is it only male issues? If not, then why? And have you not noted how feminism nearly exclusively blame men for most issues they face? What more is, in terms of crime, how does the gender matter whatever we talk about the crimin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 08:12 PM
17

I would like to understand where are you coming from more. So a link to these studies that say men are actually far more victimized by this would be helpful. I respect that, hang on, let me find my document where I have a list.Altough, its a well known fact that men are vastly more often victims than women in most crimes. Even with rape commonly understood as a female victim crime it change when you start to include made to penetrate and not penetrated as rape. Edit: okay, here you go: https://w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 07:35 PM
19

This is the dangers of lacking nuance: power is not a binary state. Those powerful few were not the only people wielding privilege: Among classes and social stations there always have been particular privileges relative to those contexts. I explicitly pointed that out, within classes women where the one to enjoy privilege, they got to stay home and relax when men worked themselves to death. They got to stay home when men was called to war. The list goes on! Just taking a look at historical rates…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 07:13 PM
17

Well, sometimes you have to be at agonistic when the other side is entirely hostile to you and your entire existence. This is not opposite to providing a sound counter alternative, it may in fact be entirely necessary. We have to constantly point it out because we are being constantly attacked. We are giving voice to people who would not otherwise be able to come up with counter arguments. Deconstructing and revealing the sexism, mistakes and hypocrisy in feminist argument is an absolute necessi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 07:01 PM
29

It's a perfectly accurate and objectively factual statement. I am sure there is some reasonable feminist authors out there, but they are rare and few between. By and large feminism is radical sexism that at best only gives lib service to true egelitarianism. Have you actually read and understood what most feminist writers actually say, and the compare it to factual reality? For example the myth that men where privileged historically and women treated as property. The issue is that everyone was t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 06:44 PM
16

Why not? It's perfectly operative. Whenever you hear a feminist say something or see it written where it's applicable then try it. Don't matter how many feminist groups there is and if it is single minded or not. It's a great litmus test to see if the statement is worthy of consideration and if it's sexist or not. And if you start to discover that it applies to a significant number of statements feminists say then maybe its time to consider if there is significant issues with feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 06:33 PM
21

Instead of rejecting it out of hand, try doing it and see how it works out. Not all so called blanket statements are inaccurate or lacking in nuance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 06:08 PM
1

Note how its about how they feel, not about how great a danger they actually are. Cause they probably discovered that women have ti much safer than men and so they base I on feelings since, yes, women do feel less safe than men, it's just that it's not based on reality and completely irrational.
/r/AntiFeminists11/03/22 07:10 AM
3

That is where you are wrong. Feminism and female rights are two very different things. Feminism is about female privilege and stigmatization of men. Sexism and misandry is at its heart. We are against the ideology of hate called feminism, not womens right.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 03:29 PM
1

Feminist do tough. https://youtu.be/GjgBfklmYj8
/r/MensRights18/02/22 03:26 PM
2

The benefit of using the term mens rights does mean I point out feminists hypocrisy in being against equal rights. I can hammer it home with a sarcastic "oh yeah, those evil mens right activist thinking men are people and deserving of equal rights" or similar.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/22 10:27 AM
3

I was being a bit facetious and provocative in the way i wrote it, a more neutral conclusion would be that men are not priviliged. That is, the small group of men holding power do not do so because they are men, and being male afford a person no benefit in and by itself. The men that hold power because of their class, not gender. And yes, they do hold a lot soft power. Your comment is accurate, consider the case of a world where every single woman holds power and is placed over every single man.…
/r/MensRights13/02/22 05:01 PM
14

A important argument is also it's logical colloary; if we live in a patriarchy where men are privileged, then men women would be over represented in the worst of people in society. It's reasonable to say the worst of in society is the homeless, and as such they represent who are least privileged in society. As such if men are privileged then most homeless must be women, but as it turns out men are homeless to a vastly greater degree than women. Ergo, women are privileged and we live in a matriar…
/r/MensRights13/02/22 08:44 AM
2

Again, there is layers of issues there. For example. a girl who really loves greasy hamburgers, she might say she loves chocolate instead cause its the girly thing and she wants the guy to think she is feminine. Or she might tell you something that she believes she likes but she only like the idea of it, or because its what political, but its not what she actually react positively towards in the moment. Just one many aspects.
/r/seduction10/02/22 07:40 PM
2

Don't help you catch them, particularly if they know you are trying to catch them
/r/seduction09/02/22 10:44 AM
0

Aside from using the wrong ‘were ‘ how is saying a child has “a nice piece of ass” from a car innocent. It’s scary you think that. You mean saying it to a woman you are interested in and want to flirt with? Perfectly innocent. You have failed to make the case that they where aware that she was 14. ​ As for that being my answer, yeah I’ll repeat it, you made no sense and yet you never bothered elaborating, trying to make it a story or I win you lose or whatever. I mean, its perfectly obvious, eve…
/r/MensRights07/02/22 10:44 PM
0

It worked that well, hu? That this is all you could come up with in answer. Good to know it worked perfectly and left you completely unable to come up with an answer. Read the sentence again reeeeaaaal slow. Maybe you figure it out. ​ They where exactly innocent. They acted perfectly normal, like a normal human being and then we had some insane wokees start basely screaming about harassment cause they dont understand normal human interaction and want to make it illegal. ​ I know you desperately …
/r/MensRights07/02/22 09:19 PM
0

Why not? How do you know I am not minor? I could very well consider this harassment. So you are guilty of harassing a minor now. Is that ok? So let me get this straight, if you engage in perfectly normal and acceptable behavior to find a life companion and have a perfectly normal talk with someone and they happen to be a minor its ok to send you to jail? Cause that is what you are arguing. You are making normal human behavior illegal.
/r/MensRights07/02/22 07:10 PM
0

Did you know, if you stopped accusing innocent people of harassment it would be near zero percent?
/r/MensRights07/02/22 07:06 PM
-3

Don't blame the guns says people living in the only western country where shootings are s regular thing.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:22 PM
1

Depends, did the guy know she was 14? I think it's crude but not something anyone should get arrested for. Tell em off, but that is just about it.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 11:52 AM
9

It's also completely false; everyone was oppressed, men as well as women. It's just that feminists dont give a shit about men and want to hide their suffering so they can pretend to be the exclusive victims. Most women trough history where vastly better of and where vastly more privileged than most men. That is the objective truth they desperately dont want people to know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/22 07:23 AM
5

Actually, it was spesifically this difference in law that feminism was created to ensure existed. It's the original reason for feminism in the first place. See, back in the day when men got voting rights, most women did not want it cause it would force them to apply for the draft. Feminist was created because some women wanted to vote without registrering for the draft. And they spesifically wanted it only for women, and for men to still be forced to register. It's why many did not support them.…
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 09:12 PM
1

The term being so fluid and always modified to whatever is convenient for feminist that is not really possible to answer, but in short; no, it does not exist, it's a myth creates by sexist feminist in order to falsely blame men for all the ills in society and stigmatize maleness. It's a blatant lie almost no matter how you construct it.
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 05:42 PM
5

Send her a phone book.
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/22 02:42 PM
7

And just because men and boys are raped and murdered *and* falsely accused by women doesn't mean they should say mean stuff to or about women.
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/22 02:39 PM
9

Yeah, it's like, what point are you trying to make here? If they want to claim a femicide they need to show two things: Majority of people killed are female Cause you know, a single murder or just few does not make it a "cide" level problem. They are killed explicitly because they are female. Cause it's usually incidental, they just happen to be female but it's not the reason. FX if a man kills his partner it's not because she is female, it's because she is his partner. I find a good way to disp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 11:55 AM
7

Where is the femicide exactly? Given the number we have a androcide problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 09:01 AM
25

Had this topic in some subreddit talking up a storm about there being a femicide problem. I pointed out that in every single country men are killed vastly more often than women and if anything we have androcide problem. They then claimed that it's a femicide problem cause the women that where killed because they where women. I said that sound like they are inventing things to justify a patently false claim and unless they could provide strong proof that where the case the entire thing is just no…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 09:00 AM
3

Yeah, it's kind of funny when mods do it, they think they are little kings with absolute power. I just shrug. But in this case its the banning of entire subreddit r/MGOW was banned and it was a subreddit about men going their own way and not caring about sex and female companionship. You can imagine just how angry that made feminist so it got banned.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 07:35 AM
3

You could say its denoting sarcasm in. Or making fun of the person who would say it. Like the person is an idiot or screeching it.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 07:31 AM
6

Well, that is for incel, if you don't want to bother you are simply going your own way. Which reddit banned as hate against women. Can't allow men not care about women every second of the day!
/r/MensRights14/01/22 07:19 AM
32

It's actually not even that, its just can't get laid. The hate part was tagged on by feminists to further demonize males. Oh, I am sure there is those who hate females, but it wasn't what incel meant, it meant simply involuntary celibate. That's is it. Anything else is just what others have ascribed to it to stigmatize men who can't get laid.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 07:41 PM
3

Yeah, you are right, but prison rape tends to be entirely left out of statistics, well, most male rapes are to be honest, but prison rape especially tends to be left out and even ridiculouled so I decided to give it a little nod.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 10:19 AM
28

Well, it's true, but only insofar it's a concern. Men are much more likely, to a vast degree, to be the victim of violent crimes. That even goes for rape (prison rape!). The only statistic that women exceeds men in is worrying about being attacked, this despite not actually being attacked anywhere new the degree men are. In fact, despite what feminists want you to believe, rape is exceedingly rare. In other words, it's true they worry about it much more than men, but it's an irrational sexist fe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/22 08:53 AM
6

Aaaaaand what are the rest of the question? And cute, trying to dig up dirt on your opponent to try and discredit him. Get out of here, your disgusting cancel culture tactics have no power here.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 07:49 PM
3

There is a mountain of fucking evidence while your claim rely on completely unsubstantiated surveys that cast a ridiculously wide net in it's definitions where even getting looked at or getting uncomfortable emails are defined as sexual assult. Of course the same old terrible survey produce the same results, it's designed spesifically to make assaults far more common than it is. It's nowhere near what feminists pretends. Fact is, if we go with what is proven in court alone false allegations are …
/r/MensRights06/01/22 07:47 PM
9

Check out their tweets on international mens day, all about women. Or the fact that primarily displayed as world toilet day in calenders and you will have to go look for it to find it out
/r/MensRights06/01/22 07:35 PM
0

Should women be charged with rape if they get pregnant and have the child without the fathers consent or is consent only important when you are trying to justify letting women murder children when convenient?
/r/MensRights04/01/22 02:29 PM
0

Should women be charged with rape if they get pregnant and have the child without the fathers consent or is consent only important when you are trying to justify letting women murder children when convenient?
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:22 PM
0

Should women be charged with rape if they get pregnant and have the child without the fathers consent or is consent only important when you are trying to justify letting women murder children when convenient?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 02:03 AM
0

Should women be charged with rape if they get pregnant and have the child without the fathers consent or is consent only important when you are trying to justify letting women murder children when convenient?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 02:03 AM
0

Yep, been talking with you and seems like you are quite adept at eluding basic facts that I present. I will just have to copy and paste this until you answer this question, maybe you will stop screaming and running away in terror. Should women be charged with rape if they get pregnant and have the child without the fathers consent or is consent only important when you are trying to justify letting women murder children when convenient?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:45 AM
1

We are not talking about pills and procedures, we are talking about the direct consequences of your arguments of who gets rights or not, stop trying so desperately to deflect buddy, it ain't working. And stop trying to dehumanize babies because you want it murder them. It's not a zef, it's a human being. A woman can do what she wants with her body but the moment she choose to have sex and make another being depended on her, she have a responsibility that comes along with that choice. As long as …
/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:45 AM
3

This may be what you are looking for https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RDnpCSIghRBlsXoY-YOG3jtfG7ELEkn995KkC0OqHro/edit?usp=drivesdk
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/21 03:11 PM
0

We are not talking about pills and procedures, we are talking about the direct consequences of your arguments of who gets rights or not, stop trying so desperately to deflect buddy, it ain't working. And stop trying to desperately dodge the question you pathetic coward; if the state explicitly define an unborn child as a person, you would support banning abortions? It's a simple question. Yes or no?
/r/MensRights24/12/21 09:22 AM
0

Keep repeating it, maybe that will make it real buddy. No changing required, it's a question based on the direct consequences of your arguments. Sorry that you don't understand rape. Should women be charged with rape if they get pregnant and have the child without the fathers consent or is consent only important when you are trying to justify letting women murder children when convenient?
/r/MensRights24/12/21 09:20 AM
0

Oh, so you can arbritarily choose who gets rights and not as is convenient? They are not given to everyone equally? Some are more equal I guess. And stop trying to desperately dodge the question; if the state explicitly define an unborn child as a person, you would support banning abortions? It's a simple question. Yes or no?
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:46 AM
0

We already established that someone is murdered and you projecting your lack of understanding on me is so cute. You must be utterly confused and butthurt about being so desperately disproven. Stop trying to deflect, hide and cry and whine and instead answer my question you pathetic coward; Should women be charged with rape if they get pregnant and have the child without the fathers consent or is consent only important when you are trying to justify letting women murder children when convenient?
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:43 AM
0

We already established that it is not limited to that. Yeah, I don't see it because it's not real, it's a fantasy invented by you. A child is not independent either, even after it's born. It's completely analogous. You keep trying to dehumanize the unborn children using words like zed and you keep failing spectacularly while perfectly and easily refute every single thing you said. Your delusion are pathetic and your defence of murder amoral. And stop trying to desperately dodge the question; if …
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:39 AM
0

When you become and unborn child I will support you being aborted, but stop murdering other people. There is murder you lie because no have no moral and ethics and have to pretend it's not murder because otherwise you have to face the fact that you support murder. That is just an objective fact and no whining and crying on your part will change that truth. Stop trying to deflect, hide and cry and whine and instead answer my question you pathetic coward; Should women be charged with rape if they …
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:35 AM
0

No, there is murdered children, that is the objective fact that you desperately want to inform and hide because it exposes your complete lack of morals and ethics. You are over emotional because people are exposing your cruel and callus lack of care for childrens lives. There eis no rights taken away from women, they are given the same as men; don't have sex if you don't want kids You are deflecting; you don't get to murder children simply because it's convenient and you don't get to not be heav…
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:28 AM
0

Ah, so taking you to space where there is no applicable laws and ending your life means it's perfectly ok, not murder at all, or maybe that was just another retarded claim on your part? Funny how you keep projecting your lack of understanding on me. It's cute <3 And stop trying to desperately dodging the question; if the state explicitly define an unborn child as a person, you would support banning abortions? It's a simple question. Yes or no?
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:22 AM
0

I get you are upset that people condemn you for wanting to murder children, but there is people around who actually ethical, so please stop throwing a tantrum because I won the argument. We already established they are people. And sorry, screeching and screaming strawman to perfectly valid argument where it's not applicable does not make it so. I know it works for you on the short buss, but among adults you have to make a convincing arguments. Should women be charge switch rape if they get pregn…
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:16 AM
0

You did not answer my question, no screaming and crying while desperately trying to dodge the question;, you made the claim that it's ok to murder unborn child because the state does not explicitly give them personhood. So, to make that a valid argument then you would support banning abortion the moment they explicitly name unborn children as a person? And absolutely, writing with you have made me quite familiar with it.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 07:59 AM
1

Ah, so it's perfectly fine to drop you off on the north pole naked? And if you have children I can kill them too as they are depended on you and so they are not people? Glad we can establish you just wanna kill people. And you agree then women who have children without the fathers consent should be charged with rape, since consent is so important?
/r/MensRights24/12/21 07:50 AM
1

Ah, so if the state define an unborn child as a person you would support making abortions illegal?
/r/MensRights24/12/21 07:47 AM
0

So you agree with me, no one can mess with the unborn child and it's organs. Good we can agree. And you are arguing something is right because its the law? So if I make it the law that I can then it's ok?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 11:32 AM
0

Oh, so shuddenly you can't abort other people. Great we could establish that.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 10:52 AM
1

Nope, not anymore ;)
/r/MensRights20/12/21 10:51 AM
0

But human life is special, we have laws that attest to that. Unless you want to argue it's not, if so you would be ok with me coming over to your place and aborting you right now?
/r/MensRights19/12/21 02:38 PM
1

And you don't get to decide what happens to the body of a unborn child nor does women get do decide whatever another person live or die simply because it's convenient. Suck it up fruit cake.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 02:37 PM
1

When you become a fetus you can abort yourself.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 09:27 PM
1

And?
/r/MensRights18/12/21 09:26 PM
1

Then you clearly have not been paying attention, it's literally the law and fully supported and defended by feminists.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 09:26 PM
2

Pretty much what feminists have been telling men all this time. I am just applying what they tell men to women equally. And no, since it's not a uniqe genetic code that makes up a separate being. That happens at conception.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 01:58 PM
2

Also the fathers is too, so he should also get to choose to stop the process if he don't want to create it then. Or do we only care about that when it comes to women?
/r/MensRights18/12/21 01:56 PM
1

The dad and the mom, can't have a baby without the fathers body. If she does not want to use her body to create another body, she can choose no to have sex. Simple as that. She don't get to end another life because it's more convenient. Nobody gets to kill people without reason and nobody should help a woman kill a baby. Once she have sex, she have made choice the same as the father has and have to live with the consequences of said choices and take responsibility for them just like the father. …
/r/MensRights18/12/21 01:54 PM
1

Survive, barely so and with society at large supporting them even during war. But that is not the point, sure women can be trained to fulfill a lot of roles men are filling, but if men are gone, who could train them? And if there some that could, they don't have the time for that. We are talking hours before critical infrastructure starts collapsing. The tv show was a normal group of women. Why did men not treat it like holidays? They started with the same basis, the results are telling no matte…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/21 11:41 AM
1

Not really, in both of your assertions. It's not sexist to simply state a truth, and you overestimate the value of women in workforce, spesifically in terms of keeping society going and supplying the basic needs required. Most female dominated are tertiary industry, they are nice to have, not need to have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/21 11:36 AM
1

I am not arguing it would not have a negative impact if women disappeared, but I am saying it would be quite a bit worse if men disappeared. See, most roles they fullfil are nice to have, not need to have. The medical industry would do just fine as its mostly men running it, we still would have all the medicine and doctors we need. Nursing would take s hit sure, but men are used to be not cared for so it would be less than an issue, more would die probably but still manageable levels. Men are 10…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/21 11:33 AM
1

Negative possibly, but accurate. I stand by what I said. Still, I respect and understand the need to protect the subreddit as they are looking for any excuse to ban it so I fully understand why you need to remove anything that could be even slightly be considered s criticism of women. Of course, there is a interesting point in me simply stating the same as the book but the genders reversed needs to be removed to protect the community but a woman doing it is a celebrated author with a published b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/21 11:24 AM
0

Well, since it's not her body but the body of the unborn child she is aborting guess she should have no choice then. Anything past that is irrelevant according to you.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 11:21 AM
-1

Great, so since it's not her body she is aborting but the body of the baby she should have no choice then.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 11:19 AM
-1

So what if it takes a toll on the woman's body? Being a indentured servant for 18 years to her choices have vastly greater impacts on the man's body and we happily force that on him, do we already established that it's perfectly ok to force someone to be a parent against their will no matter the adverse impact it may have. Let them feel the consequences of what they did to men, let them feel the same despair men have felt for generations, to have their choice taken away gleefully by uncaring ide…
/r/MensRights18/12/21 10:28 AM
6

She does. If you can't afford it, don't have sex (what we tell men anyways) or get an abortion.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 10:22 AM
0

So why are we letting the state treat men and women differently? If women gets paper abortion cause we should not treat men and women differently then men should also get equal say in whatever a child actually get aborted to follow your line of reasoning.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 10:21 AM
2

It isn't her body she is aborting? And if it where then we could argue it's also part of the fathers body. Either way, it's his child too and its her choices that led to another being being depended on her (in the wast majority of cases). If we happily ignore the fathers right to choice for the sake of the child, then we can with the mother. Tell her what we tell men all the time; don't have sex if you don't want a child.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 10:18 AM
4

They actually do, the chutes that woman can drop of unwanted babies in anonymously and no questions asked without the consent of the father? Imagine if a man did that with a baby he did not want. He would be in jail so fast your head would spin.
/r/MensRights18/12/21 10:14 AM
1

I think that is the point of the title using the exact same language as feminists, to illuminate why saying teach men not to rape is problematic. If we blame men for the actions of a rare few men, then we should do so with women too and blame them for the actions of a rare few women. But we don't, cause we are allowed to be unreasonable against men, but not women.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 01:13 PM
1

How are they ignorant? Was anything I said false? It's nothing but the truth. Yeah, its no laughing matter, and we should be compassionate with people who are in a sticky situation, but we have been. For a whole lifetime, decades upon decades we have been compassionate, supporting their reproductive rights while at getting a middle finger in return. When is enough enough? It's been made clear beyond a shadow of a doubt that they will not reciprocate our kindness. But hell, maybe we could live wi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/21 12:34 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 03:58 PM
1

But if you where a hockey player, your life centered around hockey but you never met another hockey player despite having gone any place you could imagine hockey, would that lead credence to the claim that there is no hockey to be found?
/r/MensRights02/12/21 12:43 AM
1

Depends, are you a hockey player yourself?
/r/MensRights01/12/21 04:52 PM
6

Well, yes, being a black man is worse, but the black part is just the light dusting atop the giant pile of shit it is to be a man. It's not even on a comparable level, you know the disparity in the justice system between white and black that have sparked nation wide outrage and protests? Yeah, that disparity is six times greater when you compare men and women, yet not a peep is heard from all those people running around pretending they are fighting for equality.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 10:02 AM
25

Actually, you are wrong there, there strongest correlating factor for all the things you believe black people suffer from is not actually race, but gender. I.e. take any of things you mentioned and you will find you are far better of being a woman, rather a man irrespective of the race.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 01:26 AM
1

Well, incorrect stuff in your comment sure. Everything I wrote is 100% objective facts. Perhaps the safest choice would be to run away from a murderer with gun, but I can't blame a father for wanting to save and protect his children from this gun wielding maniac. The father was a hero who died doing what was right, even if it wasn't the safest for himself. ​ What should have happened is that when a father present you with a court order for him to get the children, you got get the children and ap…
/r/MensRights29/11/21 10:52 AM
1

Aye, that is true. Its rarely enforced and mor often than not used against fathers whose custody is being interfered with. While they full well knew what they where doing and where interfering with the custody, courts are deeply biased against fathers and men in general so you are right on that. But I have to correct you, they where not simply late, they where intentionally preventing him from seeing them. But I suppose that is a common tactic employed by ex-wives, pretend that you are late whil…
/r/MensRights29/11/21 10:46 AM
1

Again, it was. Kyle wasn't a parent. And Texas Penal Code 25.03 makes it a felony to interfere with custody. So it was kidnapping. And while tresspassing laws in Texas are strong, there is still exceptions (for example most well known is police can enter your property to stop a crime or apprehend a fleeing criminal), court orders are another such exception. ​ Now, you are absolutely right in a lot of your assements tough. Strictly speaking, both legally and morally the father had a right to be t…
/r/MensRights29/11/21 10:42 AM
7

Cause he had a legal right to be there, a court appointed right to get his children. As such, it was unlawful for Kyle to order him of, it was in fact kidnapping of the children at that point. And even if not, Kyle and the mother was engaging in a felony interfering with custody which means the father was well within his right to use any force he deemed necessary to protect himself and his children from these criminals.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 01:02 PM
4

What more is, another comment mentioned that interfering with custody is a felony according to Texas Penal Code 25.03, this means that Kyle and the mother was engaging in a felony the entire time, that severely impacts any an all claims to self defence. What more is, while this is likely a planned murder, even if they can't prove it, well, seems to me that since the mom was engaging in the same felony its felony murder.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 01:00 PM
10

Women having children or abortions without the fathers consent should be classified as rape. After all, consent is key, is it not?
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/21 06:25 PM
38

I mean, with the kind of comments she have been making it seems highly likely that the entire thing is a lie on her part. Like, how can you believe someone saying things like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/21 12:26 AM
1

Everything she said is wrong. Women wheren't oppressed for centuries, people where. It's just that feminists focused on the suffering of women and hide the fact that men suffered equally or waster greater. Who was it that worked themselves to the death in coal mines? Drowned in dangerous and frigid waters while fishing? Died fighting brutal wars. It wasn't women. Women where privileged and got to stay at home, relatively safe, comfortable enjoying the fruits of the labor men did. Feminist say sh…
/r/MensRights12/11/21 03:42 PM
1

I would suggest to be kind, and make it clear how it makes you feel and ask her not to play games, either she is interested and that is fine, we all spend too much time at work to pretend its not a place to meet a partner, and we should not be in hysterics like feminists are about awkward human behavior. That said, note it all down, and if you have tried talking and she keeps making you uncomfortable either by playing games like you said while not actually being interested, or you are not intere…
/r/MensRights06/11/21 01:19 PM
1

Science work by predictions. You have a theory, if said theory is true then x should be observed, then you go out and see if you observe x. If you don't observe x then said theory is not valid. The least privileged in society is arguably the homeless. If men are privilege and women are not, then we should observe that most homeless are female. However, I he vast majority of homeless are male. Ergo, the privileged gender is not men, it's women. The objective facts does not fit the feminist agenda…
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 08:50 AM
1

Yup, and in fact, a woman who chose to have a child without the fathers consent should be charged with rape too. Consent to sex is not consent to parenthood. If consent is so vital, then father's should be able to consent or not to parenthood just the same as women.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 05:31 PM
3

We have a saying in danish "krage søger mage" which translate to crow seeks mate but "mage" can also be translated to equal or same. So the the saying is that people will find a mate that is like them.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 09:45 AM
16

I had a discussion with a feminist who claimed that we lived in a world gynocide where the norm. I pointed out that men where killed far more often than women so if anything we loved in a world where androcide is the norm. She then claimed its still femicide cause women where being killed because their where women, so I asked her if she had any proof of that, which she had none. She then started talking about how women where killed by their male partners so that proved it. I then said that if th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 10:36 PM
9

When they claim that women are economically disadvantaged and men privileged I like to say that a core feature of science is being able to make predictions based on an idea and then check if those predictions are correct to validate said idea. It's not unreasonable to say that the least economically privileged in our society is the homeless. As such, if their idea is true, then a reasonable prediction is that the majority of homeless are women if they are economically disadvantaged. Certainly, i…
/r/MensRights18/09/21 09:51 AM
2

Well, its in the name. More people are left wing here. /r/mensrights however is somewhat more 'direct' while this subreddit maintains a kinder tone.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/21 09:47 AM
3

There is 195 countries in the world, so about 0.000004% of men are running running countries compared to 0.0000007% of women which is a difference of 0.0000033% of which the total population of men and women are leaders of countries. There is 2,755 billionaries around the world. 0.00006% male and 0.000009 female. A difference of 0.000051%. Do I need to continue? Men does not rule the world. Men are not privileged. Rich people are. Powerful people are. But not men. This goes on and on for all the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/21 10:19 AM
14

Thanks, I am pissed of about the whole thing, I expected them to be after us and looking for any and all reason to ban us, I knew that we had to be more than perfect and completely squeaky clean (part of why I took a step back after making the sub and inviting mods and let the other mods run the show, I wanted to avoid being seen as the main person behind it as know I tend to give back ad good as I get when dealing with assholes online. I wanted for people much more mature and squeaky clean to b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/21 09:22 AM
54

I was the one who created /r/misandry. To the best of my memory, I never even posted or where active in the recently banned subreddits, at best I might have gone there when linked there from elsewhere, the subs I was active in related to it was /r/leftwingmaleadvocates and /r/misandry. The reason I created the sub was that I saw a post here noting that /r/misandry was squatted on by misandric trolls. Ironically, it was a post describing how reddit allows and approves of blatant misandry while hu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/21 08:11 AM
6

Done, feel free to change anything you want. Never been a mod so I will let you take charge if you want to and I will just learn as we go, could be fun to learn it I guess. Mostly just wanna avoid actual missandrist from squatting on it again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 10:30 AM
14

Whop whop, /r/Misandry is free now, I got it before anyone else decided to squad on it. Wanna be a mod?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 10:10 AM
2

Here is a fun tought experiment; would there be as many "deadbeat dads" if men had the same reproductive rights as women and could choose whatever they wanted to be fathers? I think its unfair to judge someone who was forced to be a father against their will. Blame the mother who choose to take the pregnancy to term, they had the choice, the father did not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/21 12:13 PM
21

Saw that thread earlier. Funny how they tried to justify the massively skewed support for female homeless and shelters for them by saying that they would fell into prostitution otherwise. What? How does that makes sense? What you are saying is that women have an option (prostitution) to avoid homelessness that is apparently preferable to homelessness because they choose to prostitute themselves rather than being homeless and that is why we should focus on women shelters? That is nonsens. If anyt…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/21 01:55 PM
1

Yes, that is not to say there is don't like actually skinny guy or have it as a fetish, but overwhelmingly being muscled to some degree is what women like. Not necessarily Arnold, a lot don't like the overly muscled either, but defined muscles will nearly always help. ​ That said, the greatest decider in female attraction is your personality, the energy you give off. So you can still date up if you are not muscled, but it is a hurdle to overcome.
/r/seduction12/06/21 11:44 AM
3

This exactly; the people saying you should give her your number have no concept of how these things works.
/r/seduction28/04/21 09:41 PM
1

Without a doubt get her number. No matter what girls rarely take action, and will expect you to do so. You have to be exceptionally attractive to her for her to call or she will have to be one for the rare few who are proactive. If you get the number you don't have to be. So you only give her you number if you completely don't care if she writes you or not because most likely she is not gonna. You will note that most of the people saying you should give yours to hers are girls. Never take advice…
/r/seduction28/04/21 09:39 PM
2

Yeah, exactly the argument I have been making; I am sure it can suck to get too much attention but the opposite is far worse. I mean, its litterally a form of torture to keep people alone, catcalling is not. In another post I stated that complaining about it to guys who are lonely is like a billionaire complaining about having to deal with having too much money to a poor person. But I like your homeless better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/21 11:50 AM
4

Because I don't believe that feminism in practice don't stand for equality, it only does so in word with lib service. ​ I don't hate women, I love women. I want a women who want equality, I want one with a sense of real justice and self esteem and that in my eyes means the opposite of feminism. Its the rapid self victimization and stigmatization of masculinity that is unattractive. Its that feminism don't seek equality, but privilege that is unattractive. Its the targeted diminishment of serious…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 10:46 AM
1

Well, its complicated, but there is a biological element to it. In nature its easily to get killed, particularly males dies in great numbers. If you are old in nature it proves you are strong, capable and able to provide. You surviving so long must mean that you got something going for you. Its only natural for women to be attracted to older men (and vice versa, pregnancy is hard on the body, so being young is good) . Tough, there is an element of natural "gold digging" there too in that part of…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 10:36 AM
43

The sheer hypocrisy is amazing, they been jammering up about men not taking responsibility and stopping violent men and talking up a storm blaming all men for the actions of a few violent people blaming their gender but the moment there is even the slightest hint that women then also take responsibility and act against violent women they loose their fucking minds. ​ Look at how they then start whining about how dangerous it is to confront the abuser, and expecting their friends to do so, but the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/21 03:14 PM
22

Because feminists are always talking up a storm and making pretensions that feminism is not about women, its about equality and is for men just as much as women. Its not. Its actively hostile to the interests of men and seek to promote female privilege wherever it goes. ​ Now, If they acknowledged that they work for the sole benefit and privilege of women I would have less issue with it, fighting for your own interests is fine to a degree, but this pretension that they are fighting not for thems…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/21 11:14 PM
1

The deep injustices that men have to face every day and then be told they are privileged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/21 08:38 AM
4

That is a very common issue. As other posts details, you for various reasons ends up overthinking and not being natural. Part is putting them on a pedestal, part is that you try too hard to be perfect. This is where the people usually just say "be yourself", it is true, that is the solution, but it's bad advice does not help you or give you any tools to deal with the situation. It's not actionable. But it's one of the more tricky things to solve, but perhaps I can give you some advice; you gotta…
/r/seduction16/06/20 11:23 AM
9

What a load of horseshit. This is an example of why seduction and PUHA is dying. All these feel good political correct nonsens og whiny motherfuckers who don't have the balls to put in the effort to actually do what is needed. You failed to understand these thing you mentioned. All of these things are just naming and defining behaviors and ideas so we can communicate them. For me it all has been godsend because et helped me understand things I would otherwise not and then identify and grow the p…
/r/seduction19/05/20 06:46 AM
1

I relax way more cold approaching than in a club. To me its opposite; club game puts way too much pressure on you while cold approaching is nice and chill. Night game is a high energy competition, day game is laid back fun. ​ I think the issue here is exactly that the advice is from natural players. Natural players have no concept of what they do that makes it work, they just do. As such they also make for poor teachers as they can't understand not having the skills they do. They understand what…
/r/seduction06/05/20 10:51 AM
1

This is club/bar game wich is different from day game. ​ He isn't wrong for the most part, it will work fine in a club. The one thing he is wrong about is dont cold approach, it's a different type of game and his style wont work as well, so it's obvious why he doesn't like it. But cold approach is one of the best things you can do. I suck balls at club and bar game, but I am fantastic at cold approaches. ​ Cold approaches are a numbers game, but mostly so in the beginning, when you get better th…
/r/seduction06/05/20 10:34 AM
20

Uh, that is why we here, no? What do you think this sub is for?
/r/seduction01/04/20 04:54 PM
1

> That makes a lot of sense. I’m a very blunt type of person and I like to make intentions clear immediately so that’s why I was confused that it took him so long to say that. ​ Well, but what if you don't know what you want yet? To him you probably was pestering him about something he have had yet to emotionally figured out yet. ​ > He said it took him 8 months to decide he wanted to date his ex and that was way too long in my opinion ​ Yet would that not mean that when he finally decided to da…
/r/seduction06/03/20 09:51 PM
3

What you have to realise is that most guys operate on the basis of sex is great and if the girl is reasonably attractive and there is no very good reason to say no then why not? When a guy writes then he is still open for whatever, and definitely wont say no to sex. When he wrote you he did so because you where attractive probably and that was mostly what he was thinking. So yes to sex, but lets see what she is like. And well, he found out you where not someone he wanted to have a relationship w…
/r/seduction06/03/20 09:39 PM
9

That cause you are thinking again. You are searching for what to say next. Don't. Just force yourself to start talking, don't thing something up first. Just like walking, your brain is build to talk, we are social animals and it's evolved to be a core part of us. Like walking, if you focus on it, how to take the step, lifting the foot and putting it down, maintaining balance you basically become a game of qwop but if you just start walking without thinking your subconscious brain will supply all…
/r/seduction13/02/20 09:01 AM
1

Aye, personally it frustrates the hell out of me, I can fuck for hours on end and not come, some girls like it, but there often come a point where friction starts to be a thing and they feel unhappy they can't make me cum. ​ But hey, maybe it can help him last a little longer and maybe hit a good equilibrium.
/r/seduction28/01/20 09:54 AM
2

Death grib my man. I have the opposite problem from jerking of too much and having no sensitivity left. Jerk of and grib your dick hard. And jerk of before the date.
/r/seduction27/01/20 10:20 PM
1

Nah, the only thing that says for sure is that you are not facially fortunate, women don't write/approach first unless you are really hot.
/r/seduction10/01/20 02:41 PM
2

True that, I think you are right on a lot of points. Putting into words what things a person should improve can massively improve their chanses.
/r/seduction30/12/19 08:15 AM
2

I think what you probably fail to realize is that for 90% of guys the primary issue here is getting out there and approaching. Yes, all you said is true, there is a thousand things you need to work on and learn to improve your game. But going out there is the key to having it in the first place. Don't matter how good a game you got if you don't ever go out there and use it. The first and hardest step for most is putting yourself out there, which is why so many focus on it. That one step is gonna…
/r/seduction24/12/19 12:38 PM
6

If you said that to an old friend then yeah, you are an asshole. Friends are there to listen to each other when one need to went and share their frustrations. If it's important enough that they can only talk about that subject that day, sit down, shut up and listen, you would want a friend do the same when you are hurting. If it's someone who just keep talking about themselves all the time whenever you meet, and especially if they don't really know you that well then yeah, it's fine. Someone nee…
/r/seduction13/12/19 06:58 PM
1

You might not have learned it yet, but a good first step for you will probably be to shower and shave, I can see its something you need to solve given your extreme focus on it. You too can be successful, but these are some basic steps you need to take.
/r/seduction28/05/19 08:32 AM
1

Hey, its ok if you are in high school, I could already tell by your lack of maturity. You can loose your v-card any time, but you gotta let go of your anger and focus on you impotence with women.
/r/seduction28/05/19 08:30 AM
1

Hey, just trying to help you get the success I have with women and loosing the v-card you desperately want to loose but if it's not welcome then good luck with dealing with your anger issues over your lack of success with women.
/r/seduction27/05/19 09:44 AM
1

See, now this shows exactly how ignorant and hateful you are. You have no knowledge of what being a PUA is and what it entails, you are speaking from a basis of complete ignorance and have hate in your hearth because you been told to hate and you never questioned this nor bothered to actually verify for or understand what you been told to hate. I am sure you can find something that will support your ignorance if you look hard but fact remains, between the two of us, I am the only one that have i…
/r/seduction26/05/19 07:34 AM
1

> It literally says pickup artists in the description ​ Yes, and? That is not what is being questioned. ​ > and anyone that subscribes to that dumbass trend of thought most definitely has the mind of a 17 year old incel. ​ This is what being questioned. Your ignorant hate based on some rather mistaken preconceived notions.
/r/seduction25/05/19 08:09 PM
1

Well, if you are here to learn and improve yourself; welcome. This sub can change your life by teaching you how to get what you want from relationship and life general and embrace and appreciate your natural masculinity (if you are a guy) that so many people want you to hate and be scared of. If you are here to hate, please leave, this is a sub that tries to help people, people who have been trough a lot of hate and lonelines l, the last thing they need is more.
/r/seduction25/05/19 07:33 AM
1

So, your hate stems not from any knowledge of what this sub is about but rather some preconceived notion?
/r/seduction25/05/19 07:28 AM
3

Whats with the brigading happening lately? Did some more well known sub link us and now we have the trolls coming in?
/r/seduction25/05/19 12:59 AM
0

Well, that is not strictly true, Intelligence is not malleable, it's strongly heritable and there is nothing you can do to improve it. Skill and knowledge can be improved however, but one should not confuse it with intelligence.
/r/seduction22/05/19 02:25 PM
0

Yes it is a thing, nonmatre how many want it to be otherwise. But it depends on what you are looking and what you mean by it. Take intelligence, it's a strongly heritable trait. There is nothing you can do to improve it, no matter the books your read or excersizes you do it won't improve, you are born with it. But you can reduce it, poor nutrition will stunt your growth or I could just wack you on the head till the IQ points starts going down. But other than that, like height what you got is all…
/r/seduction22/05/19 02:21 PM
2

Alright, sorry for the late answer, was traveling so had to get home first. The way you initiate a kiss is a good start. Teasing her can help, like moving forward for a kiss and get almost there, but let her go rest of the way. Or even better, pull back a little, keep your kiss just barely away from hers and let her chase you, deny her the kiss for a little and make her laugh before allowing her to kiss you. Or you can tease her by moving away and kissing around her mouth, on the sides, build up…
/r/seduction05/01/19 05:11 PM
1

You are welcome! Feel free to ask if you want any tips, I am on my phone, but when I get on my PC I can give you some fun things to try out and see if they work for you.
/r/seduction02/01/19 09:58 PM
3

So learn from her. That is what I have done. Every girl I kissed taught me something new. Notice what she do and do not, what you like and don't. Does she lightly nible your libs? Earlobe? What is she doing with her hands? Then try it out and see how she reacts. If she like it you will likely feel the reaction. A good kiss is not only what you do with your lips but also your body and hands. Experiment and play and discover what kind of kisser your are.
/r/seduction02/01/19 09:12 PM
1

Was a kissless virgin until 25, if I can change and become better so can you https://www.reddit.com/r/aspergers/comments/7etitc/was_asked_to_post_this_here_my_life_story_and_how/
/r/seduction24/12/18 02:58 PM
9

Because the intend is different. If you fail the shit test, you are disqualified or at the very least set back as a man. If a woman don't respond to teasing it does not set er her back, when qualifying its to make her invest in you but it does not change her chance with you. Shit tests are something you need pass to succeed, teasing and qualifying is something you do make you succeed (and have more fun). Shit testing and qualifying and teasing is separate things. Women could tease and qualify, b…
/r/seduction08/12/18 10:40 PM
3

As long as you don't look like a troll and they aren't taken most men will be thrilled, they rarely are approached. Even if they are taken or you look like you live under a bridge they still will be thrilled, they just won't jump on the chance.
/r/seduction01/12/18 09:32 AM
2

Have a look into DiCarlo escalation ladder. It's not seduction as a whole but it cleanly define the aspect of being physical.
/r/seduction21/10/18 08:25 AM
19

There is three ways to ask a girl out, the good, the neutral and the bad. ​ The bad is what you did, I do it sometimes too, but generally it turns girls of because you put her on a pedestal by saying, I am willing to work with your schedule, its more important than mine. It work with girls that are really into you, but generally its a turn of. ​ The neutral is sugesting a day or two, going hey, I am free Thursday and Saturday. It shows you care about you time, but don't really do anything. It wo…
/r/seduction23/08/18 01:22 PM
3

Improving your life is a good idea, trouble is, its not actionable content. See, how does one go about it? Before getting into seduction I spend years mucking around not knowing what to do cause bettering yourself is simply too vague. I had no idea where to begin, what to do, how to do it. What helped me the most was watching a early PUA video of a guy walking up to a girl on the street and telling her she looked cute and had a conversation with her. That helped me more than anything, it was tha…
/r/seduction11/08/18 08:24 AM
2

To ad to that, stay the fuck away from girls who only have guy friends. If she got both anxiety issues and only guy friends, run like she got the plague. She will only give you missery. Now if she also says she hates drama, you better of droping everything and seeking a new life in Tijuana.
/r/seduction08/08/18 09:54 AM
1

You can just outright ask her name next time, if she gets angry you just follow up with that you meant her last name.
/r/seduction15/07/18 05:24 PM
2

I can't link because I am on my phone but I have Aspergers and was a virgin til 25 and I posted about how I improved myself and started to attract women. Look through my post history (not comment history).
/r/seduction02/07/18 07:45 AM
0

Was traveling to Bulgaria the other day and saw a cute girl sitting and chatting with a guy, wondered if they where together, in the end I just went up and asked directly if they where together, they said no and I turned to the girl and said it was good, cause I tough she was very cute and had to come over, she laughed and we talked and in the end I got her Facebook.
/r/seduction30/06/18 07:02 AM
6

One thing, for men their attraction is often very simple in that either we think you are attractive or not. Looks are a large components of that, we can quickly decide if we are interested or not. Its not to say personality is not important, but that more or less come after we short for looks. For women, looks are only a component in their initial shorting. And, some men are into Asians, and some are not. I am one those that are not. Nothing against Asians, I just don't find them attractive, eve…
/r/seduction18/04/18 05:09 PM
5

About the same as a marine biologist knowing more about fish than fishes. Being something is not the same as understanding it. Many things can only be observed from the outside as it is unseable by the actor.
/r/seduction03/04/18 04:20 PM
1

Run for the hills! I was seeing a girl who I was getting serious with, even went on a trip to my home country with her. Hell, I even fount a apartment for her when she wanted to move out from her parents place. She had a lot of male friends. I kept hearing rumors and mutual friends told me stuff but I choose to trust her as trust is important I a relationship. Turned out that she already had a boyfriend and was sleeping around with a lot of guys. No wonder she was stressed all the time and actin…
/r/seduction25/03/18 09:27 AM
3

Ya, I am kinda really into a girl, we talk well together and have lot of fun. but she is taken and I don't do taken girls. So I see other girls, it helps, but it still kinda suck when you meet someone you wipe really well with and want to spend more time with. But I have come to appreciate that I do get to spend time with her and enjoy it, even if I it can't be all I want it to be. I just have to keep looking and find someone I wipe as well with or better who is free.
/r/seduction11/03/18 10:21 PM
1

Don't sweat it, I was 25 before I lost my virginity. The most important thing is going out and putting yourself in situations where things happens. Go talk to girls on the street, in the library, at school, at a party, whatever it does not matter. Do something crazy, but yourself outside your comfort zone, can't dance? Join a dance club, make new friends! Talk with the guys, talk with the girls! Sure, you are probably gonna be really shit at first, and maybe for a while, but keep at it, people a…
/r/seduction13/01/17 05:37 PM
1

Keep at it, it gets better. Its hard work and takes a long time, but sooner or latter you will look back and be amazed at all the change that happened. I was a virgin til 25, today I have been with more girls than I can remember. It took years of hard work, but you will get there.
/r/seduction11/11/16 09:29 PM
2

But the point is that that relization will not come with broad ideas and vague terms, showing literal examples conveys the idea much better. Everybody knows what they have to do. The problem is that their anxiety is crippling them so they look for an easy way out in the form of tips and tricks. No, that is exactly it, I had not idea what to do; quite tilterally had no concept of how to approach and meet people. I wasn't afraid, I just had no idea, and this nonsense about inner game and mindset m…
/r/seduction06/09/16 01:10 PM
3

Specific examples was immensely helpful when I started out, seeing a few videos of guys approaching women and talking with them was breakthrough for me. Before that I could not get myself to even aproach, but after seeing it I was like "aahh, they are actually just go up to random girls and saying hi and talk about whatever, no magic required" When you are starting out and have no idea of how anything works vague ideas aren't all that useful. Giving specific gives a person an idea of what they s…
/r/seduction06/09/16 11:23 AM
-2

Sit down in front of her and point to you ear, when she takes out her headphones ask her what she is listening to. Or just be direct and say you just saw her and thought she was cute. If she leaves her hands and arms on the table you can touch them while talking and making points. Simple as that.
/r/seduction30/08/16 08:13 PM
3

So I live in Denmark but there is this place called bazar west that is basically a big old building filled with little stalls and food places run by immigrants. Walking into the place one moment you are rainy old denmark and suddenly you are teleported thousand of kilometers south east to some Arabian marketplace with tight alleys and exotic scents. Its a great place to take girls, especially if they haven't been there before. They get to experience something completely different and exiting whi…
/r/seduction29/08/16 09:31 PM
1

k, thanks
/r/seduction04/08/16 07:09 PM
1

I did, but the damn thing only returned various pick up sites that used gambler in their vocabulary and some french sites. But thanks anyway.
/r/seduction03/08/16 08:26 PM
1

If you're an introvert look up the Gambler Link? Googling that is not likely to succeed.
/r/seduction03/08/16 08:05 PM
1

Put your lips on his lips. Voila! Done. Just kiss more people and pay attention to what they do to make you feel good, remember what they did right and wrong and apply it. Really, I was 25 when I first started kissing and meeting girls, its no problem for me now. Really, there is nothing to it, the main part of it is simply putting your soft lips on theirs. Some like it dry, some like a little spittle, watch their reaction. Then you can spice it up some, move around bit, nibble a little on their…
/r/seduction30/03/16 04:26 PM
6

An excellent example of having no filters. Its a popular technique, you basically just say whatever you want. Search for "how to never run out of things to say" and you will get plenty of guides. Basically, a person filters what they say because they have been taught what is appropriate and what it not. This prevents you from being spontaneous and witty. Learn to remove the filters. Do cold approaches and just say whatever that goes out you mouth, don't think about it. As you get better you lear…
/r/seduction28/02/16 11:12 AM
10

God thing its any time here in Denmark, it always rain. Maybe I will see the sun next week.
/r/seduction15/02/16 09:39 PM
20

Get professional pictures. It helps a lot, my brothers girlfriend at the time was a photographer and I got her to take a couple of pictures, my match rate went up noticeably. Generally you should have a professional picture as your first picture. You may want to make it slightly "edgy", for a lack of a better word. The next picture should be something to catch their interest, something cool. Then maybe a funny picture of yourself, perhaps goofing around with your friends. If you have a good body…
/r/seduction31/01/16 12:24 PM
4

If you have already had sex with both it makes it easier. You might want to send feelers out on whatever they would fuck a girl, joke around a bit with it, figure out if they want to experiment. Bring them together at some party and escalate and make tension, hinting at it. If you can bring the topic on it and get them both to admit that they would try it with another girl in front of each other you are golden. Get them to dance together, dare them to kiss and whatnot. Just do what you usually d…
/r/seduction21/12/15 09:30 AM
6

Exactly what I was gonna write too. Never ask, girls are gonna say no because girls don't wan't to admit they wan't sex. Just lead and she will follow. Sometimes I don't even have an excuse or say anything, I just take a walk with them and then naturally end up at my home since I live close to a bar and club area.
/r/seduction26/06/15 07:47 PM
1

http://imgur.com/Fn8h393 since I am posting the picture anyway, rate me I guess?
/r/seduction04/05/15 12:06 AM
2

Look, let me tell you about gorillas. Which gorilla do you think is getting all the gorilla ladies? The young one just entering adulthood at the bottom of the hierarchy or the old experienced silverback who sit at the top? Humans are the same. You slaver over young girls because its your biological imperative; young girls are the most fit for birthing children so most men have evolved to be attracted to them. Same with women, the best person to be a father is the old silverback at the top of the…
/r/seduction12/04/15 07:58 AM
1

Google good looking looser. The PUA behind the site is a 30 something PUA picking up college chicks. Edit: Actually, I just did it for you and even found a example video. http://www.goodlookingloser.com/entry/in-field-videos/good-looking-loser-3-min-car-video
/r/seduction11/04/15 10:43 PM
2

So I just tried the whole mariachi band routine on a couple of girls that had flaked on me. It worked like magic. I usually never try to flirt over text, focusing on getting out on dates as quickly as possible, but that may have been a mistake. These girls usually take forever to answer, days even. Using the Mariachi band text I got answers from from both within minutes. One was just a "What :D". Figuring she did not know what a mariachi band is, I send her this pic and told her a sob story how …
/r/seduction24/02/15 01:07 PM
0

As general rule, texting is bad for creating attraction. However, I stumbled upon a method that works for me and haven't failed to turn the table where the girls starts messaging me and getting my attention: After I get her number I message her and at one point (I know, draw the rest of the fucking owl and all that, but it really depends on the situation) I get her to send a picture of herself, it does not have to be sexual, just a simple picture of her head is fine, they are usually okay with t…
/r/seduction12/01/15 10:28 AM
1

Yeah, I am afraid this is gonna happen every time I get drunk. Up until recently I have been a asocial nerd and have only been changing things for the last few months. Reading seddit material and improving myself, but I still have trouble showing sexual intend and being spontaneous when I am not drunk. This is the farthest I have ever gotten. Well, at least I learned something, and I might be able to do better without alcohol now with that experience under the belt. You think maybe I should text…
/r/seduction05/12/14 05:21 PM
1

Yah, but its darker in the winter and that tends to make people more somber.
/r/seduction29/11/14 04:52 PM
12

Your first kiss should not be at the beginning (and often not at the end) of the first or second date but rather at the middle or towards the end, preferably at the "climax". Like if you have been at a comedy club, had some drinks at a bar and are now dancing at a club, that is the time to strike. Or when changing venue. You have been bowling and are now heading to a nearby bar to get a drink. You are holding hands walking at a path along a river and you come upon a bench with and willow three. …
/r/seduction19/11/14 11:57 AM
3

I have linked this before. Its excellent. Follow it. Also, cold weater can be a problem yeah, but its also a great excuse to hold hands. "Oh your hands are cold? Here, let me warm them for you." Hold er hands in yours. "Watch out, its slippery here" Put you arm around her to support her or offer your elbow to her. If you are lucky she will slip a little and then you have to support her even more.
/r/seduction19/11/14 11:47 AM
3

Denmark
/r/seduction15/11/14 06:39 PM
1

Yeah, they probably wanted sex, but did not want to look like sluts so they put up a last minute resistance like that. Back of a little and tell them we are gonna go as far as she wants. Then after a little of lighter kissing and whatnot ramp up the kino and push for sex again. Unless they basically says "NO" or "STOP" its just them telling themselves they are not too easy. They are actually telling you what to expect, not that they don't want sex. The fact that she says this means she is alread…
/r/seduction12/11/14 09:44 AM
1

Tønsberg
/r/seduction11/11/14 12:48 PM
17

Plus, in my club there is like 3-4 boys and 300+ girls. There is real competition for the men when we are doing paired dancing...
/r/seduction26/10/14 09:44 AM
4

Look. You will fail. You will get rejected. You need to accept that. And embrace it. Embrace it it to the point where your success is determined not by whatever you get in the girls pants or you get slapped but by whatever you approached her or not. Getting in her pants is success. Getting slapped is success. Kissing or just talking. Her cussing you out and telling you to get bend. All success. Only failure is doing nothing. Doing nothing is worse than being rejected. When you do and get rejecte…
/r/seduction20/10/14 11:50 AM
1

Dancing. I dance at a dance club and there is 4-5 men and 300+ women.
/r/seduction16/10/14 12:06 PM
3

I was visiting my sister and ended up going to birthday party for a female friend of hers. At the party there was this other female friend of hers, a pretty and bubbly 20 year old girl with an easy laugh. Quite enjoyable to be around. She had brought her boyfriend along. A balding 30 something man with prodigious stomach big enough to put his cup on and he was barely as tall as she was. Something like this. Yet this ugly man sized beach ball had one of the most amazing girls at the party pregnan…
/r/seduction17/08/14 10:49 AM
2

It's pretty simple. To you, yes. To others, no.
/r/MensRights13/05/10 02:23 PM
1

In the story as told, it was not a flirtatious remark; it was persistently repeated lewd remarks. to you maybe, but not to him. What flirting is can be quite different from person to person.
/r/MensRights13/05/10 02:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter