TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

loganizer Archive

View 6 posts and 365 comments by loganizer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

My school had one of these. My girlfriend sent an email to group sponsoring the class and was told that there was a separate class for men. I never EVER saw the other class advertised.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 06:17 PM
0

Did you post this on the wrong thread or am I missing your point?
/r/MensRights15/07/13 06:31 PM
3

No, it makes sense. I've just always heard the reason was misogyny. I'll have to research it more to see what the evidence supports.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:18 PM
1

Really? I don't know a lot about the issue but this seems to clash with what I have heard.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:12 PM
5

Well, it is interesting to me.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 11:42 AM
6

I think he was speaking to the hypocrisy of a Chinese fortune cookie shitting on men when women in China are currently being shat upon. Although there is a good chance this fortune cookie never came from China.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 11:25 AM
2

Do you have a source for that? I was curious after reading this if their claim that it was successful was even remotely true.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 11:21 AM
12

it points out what both subs find important. That is interesting in itself.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 11:19 AM
12

No he's not. He isn't making a statement at all, just a comparison.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 11:09 AM
2

able-bodied men can not be raped Explain.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:26 AM
2

I say brave because a lot of people would immediately discount your opinion and flame you for being from SRS. But it's good to see you want to have a meaningful dialogue. Welcome :)
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:43 PM
2

You are quite brave to come here.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:00 PM
5

How is he trolling?
/r/MensRights06/06/13 01:41 PM
1

You straw-manned twice in a row.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:09 PM
0

Source?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 07:25 PM
0

Very nice.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 07:21 PM
2

I don't see an uproar at all.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:01 PM
2

I honestly see it as saying "including people who actually matter."
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:25 PM
3

|Women are never going to be safe in their own homes until they stop hitting as well as their partners stop hitting. Good thing he has correctly identified the victim here./s
/r/MensRights03/05/13 04:27 PM
2

What is the root of the issue?
/r/MensRights03/05/13 03:49 PM
4

I've been doing experiments with rape. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:14 PM
2

Agreed. If we are going to throw a shit fit whenever a woman is prematurely labelled, we have to do the same here. That's equality.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:53 PM
1

Gay how?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 07:13 AM
14

I looked on /r/TwoX and /r/feminism and a majority of the posters there think Adria Richards is full of shit, for what it's worth.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:41 PM
1

A DDoS and a picket line are not even remotely on the same scale.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:17 PM
6

I'm not supplying your proof for you. I was pointing out that no denying of rape victims is happening in this article.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 08:14 PM
4

Where in this article do you see that happening?
/r/MensRights20/02/13 06:07 PM
1

I get the heart of what you are saying. We spend far too much time fighting feminism and not enough fighting for men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:00 PM
3

Because we now have the reputation of an anti-feminist circlejerk.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 07:44 PM
7

Seriously. This is the kind of shit that we get really pissed at feminists for saying. It has no place here.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:36 PM
2

I agree with you. For the most part I feel like it just encourages future crime.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:54 PM
8

The idealist in me says that this is a great step towards equality. The realist in me agrees with you whole-heartedly.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:51 PM
-1

A new debate surely begins though: Can women pass the physical requirements in order to earn those positions? And by debate you mean shitfest.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:45 PM
19

He's getting a lot of support so far.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:21 PM
3

Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:19 PM
22

It's ironic that when you change the phrasing so that things happen to women, you are transforming them from people who do actions to objects which are acted upon. Women objectify themselves and other women all the time.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 02:49 PM
1

The woman, her brother and her adopted son Unless he was adopted when he was in his early teens, this is his mother.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:58 PM
7

Looks like I have something new to read.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:22 PM
6

I only see one that does this.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:50 PM
2

Close Reddit and learn, Kettle! -Pot
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:45 PM
6

I feel like this belongs at /r/mrmemes
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:25 PM
1

I hadn't really thought of this before, but men are taught from childhood to protect themselves and others. Maybe that's why men don't understand why telling someone to take precautions against violence is victim blaming. We have been told the same for years.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:10 PM
5

I also see a special snowflake.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:00 PM
2

Which campaign is this?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:26 PM
1

What is this even about?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:18 PM
6

Away?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:05 PM
2

Yeah I can see your point. Personally I don't mind them so long as they promote discussion.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:58 PM
14

The Oppression Olympics has started!
/r/MensRights08/01/13 02:19 PM
1

Right, because no TRUE man feels pain./s
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:55 PM
2

Why?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:53 PM
1

An internet is a network that connects two or more internal networks. THE Internet is the enormous world wide connection of most of the internets in the world.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:51 PM
0

2x has a post on this and a lot of people are calling it out for bad stats.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:19 PM
5

The rape charge was prosecuted simultaneously with the custody case, and the divorce court had frozen all Hetherington's assets so he had no money to hire a lawyer or make bond. Nevertheless, the criminal court ruled that he was not indigent and refused to provide him with a lawyer. For 12 years, the court refused to provide Hetherington with a transcript of the trial. Without funds, he was unable to buy one, so he was effectively denied his right of appeal, and no appeal has ever been heard on …
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:54 PM
2

This is copypasta from a different post, but it is delicious.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 08:37 PM
38

You "man up" and "check your privilege," of course. /s
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:56 PM
3

If there are any, they certainly don't seem very active.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:07 PM
2

It looks like an MRA is one of the top comments.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:43 PM
1

Both articles tout a very old, repeatedly disproven rape myth, which is that rapists rape because they're confused about whether they have consent. Research shows that rapists actually do know what they're doing and target drunk victims in part because they know victims will not be believed if they report. So why exactly do we need to teach boys about consent?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 09:19 PM
2

Wooooow.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 09:12 PM
7

You can tell a movie/show is a comedy when a women hits a man. When a man hits a woman, it's usually a drama.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:49 PM
2

Honest communication about isn't that hard, is it?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:40 PM
2

Misogynist bullshit. We are not /r/womensuck.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:33 PM
4

I don't see what's so bad about this.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:32 PM
3

Can you elaborate? That sounds interesting.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 07:24 PM
6

She doesn't deserve shame for being sexually active while pregnant, but she absolutely does for drinking while pregnant. Edit: Except now that I'm reading this more closely, I don't see where it says she was pregnant. Edit 2: Sorry, I'm bad at this whole reading thing.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:02 PM
4

"and since U.S. women are a million times more superficial than men, they're a million times more miserable." I was going to ask for a source, but then I realized you don't have one. Your source is your heavily biased perception of the world around you.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:42 PM
6

Are you listening in on their conversations? Are you a mind reader? Or are you just extremely biased and angry?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:38 PM
4

Good point. I have no idea how they could enforce this.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:11 PM
0

This is a stretch.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 03:17 PM
1

This didn't strike me as overly sympathetic, but I seriously doubt the tone would be the same if a father killed his son.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 03:16 PM
10

Fendrick adds that “women have more to lose — kids, social/community standing, etc," Fathers don't have to worry about their kids apparently.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 02:57 PM
2

I like that this is on The Moderate Voice. I think a nonpartisan approach to this issue is the only way it will work.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 02:55 PM
1

Get this shit out of here. Not MR related at all.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:29 PM
3

All lobbies are men's lobbies, duh. /s
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:27 PM
2

It's a shame you aren't allowed to give more wonderful advice like this.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:14 PM
3

Is it just me, or does the term "femme fatale" seem to almost romanticize (not sure if this is the right word) female killers?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:22 PM
2

Tanya Wilson (27) Wilson then said “You can't touch me, I'm a girl,” and smashed the Bulmers glass into the barman's face. Judge Patrick McCartan imposed an 18 month sentence, suspended on condition that she maintains good behaviour and continues with her alcohol counselling. This is what female privilege looks like. An adult women assaults and disfigures a barman and is told not to do it again.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:33 PM
2

It isn't men' rights related, but it was an interesting read all the same.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:03 PM
2

Spot on.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:36 PM
6

it's a well hidden fact, in a politically society, that children who grow up without fathers end up with behavioral problems This was a theme in a lot of my criminal justice classes in college. It is a known fact in academia and it is not being addressed.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:25 PM
2

Why does almost every post here have 0 points?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 03:24 PM
5

Cherry-picking.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 01:55 PM
7

Not that much of a stretch. If I were a woman who was constantly being asked by her lover if she was still taking the pill, I would probably think he didn't trust me. And no, I use a condom every time.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 10:07 PM
3

And then he gets yelled at for not trusting her to take the pill.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 09:56 PM
9

I definitely believe rape culture is real. Male rape is trivialized, downplayed or dismissed all the time.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:54 PM
1

Interesting.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:38 PM
8

CacaFuego I like it.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:28 PM
2

iFeminist?
/r/MensRights12/12/12 01:38 PM
2

He deserves it. He's the hero MR needs.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:56 PM
5

I'm just at a point where I don't know how to get out of this shitty radical feminism bullshit that I spout whenever my male friends make a comment that would be deemed TOTALLY WRONG OH MY GOD WHAT A MISOGYNIST by feminists, when in reality it's just a bit of a joke or a well meaning compliment. Programming is hard to undo. When you hear something repeated over and over, it starts to become your own personal truth.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:43 PM
10

Flora Annie Steel — a forgotten name now, but a famous author in 1912 — wrote a poem in the paper saying that the men who perished in the Titanic disaster achieved a mercifully quick death and instant glory whereas their wives were left to grieve and fend for themselves. ‘Women and children last! That is the law of the land.’ Turns out that women are still the victims even when they survive.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:21 PM
2

Is it absorbed through the skin? It sounds like it is absorbed directly into the bloodstream, which would be more difficult for a man simply due to anatomy.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:07 PM
1

I don't think it would completely thwart hole-pokers but it definitely give a bit more protection.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:04 PM
1

They could faciliate outreach programs to men who are sexually and physically abused, because again, the notion that men are strong, resilient and unable to be harmed is rooted in patriarchy. This is actually a good suggestion, minus the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:15 PM
8

Why? Serious question, supposing child support is for the needs of the child, why do these needs increase based on the income of parents?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 12:28 AM
1

Did I ever say that? I'm well aware that men receive much more severe sentences than women. I think the answer to unequal sentencing should be an equal amount of probation/rehabilitation measures for men, not incarcerating women at an equal rate to men. But I'm well aware that this is not a popular theory of criminal justice.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:49 PM
0

And that person will be just as dead regardless of whether the person responsible for their death goes to prison for 20 years or goes into rehab. The difference is that one of those paths leads to a rehabilitated human being who will have the chance to contribute to society, and the other leads to a socialization into the prison system and an individual who is very likely to re-offend.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:18 PM
1

I think you are in agreement with most of this subreddit on that issue.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:31 PM
0

There is an obvious difference between drunkenly losing control of your vehicle and killing someone and intentionally running someone over.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:29 PM
7

The argument I have heard from self-identified feminists (as well as a couple of judges) is that punishing false accusers creates an atmosphere where actual rape victims are hesitant to report rapes.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:18 PM
-3

Eh. I'll agree to disagree. I oppose incarceration for almost all non-violent offenses because I don't think it actually works.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:14 PM
17

I understand. My problem is with a society that accepts this kind of excusing for one gender but not the other.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:57 PM
9

Do you believe that filing a false rape report should be a punishable offense? Just curious.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:50 PM
1

Can we just take a minute and acknowledge that this was a really idiotic thing to say? I see a lot of people saying "well men are victim blamed all the time" and that is an unhelpful attitude right now. Our response to this should not be "why should they not be victim blamed" but rather "victim blaming is wrong."
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:02 PM
3

Why does she even have custody of her children? She sounds like a danger to herself and her family.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:25 PM
7

I actually agree with his sentencing decision here. I think rehabilitation is the best course of action here. But I seriously doubt she would have been given this opportunity if she were a man. This inequality in sentencing MUST be addressed.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:24 PM
4

I agree. I feel like we need to stop talking so much about how feminists are bad and focus on...well... men's rights.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:07 PM
3

I don't think you'll find many Obama supporters in here.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:02 PM
2

The general tone of the comments is "lol faggot" and general amusement over the violence.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:34 PM
1

Watch this be labelled as a straw man.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:29 PM
100

"Very plainly, she wasn’t thinking straight," said Mr Rippon, who submitted that alcohol and cocaine abuse had been symptoms of an underlying psychiatric problem. This kind of excusing makes me sick.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:20 PM
37

Ooh ooh! I know! Victim blaming!
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:00 PM
1

I think you summed up pretty well why we need men's rights. It's not that we are saying "all women will abuse the system just because they can." We are questioning "why is the system set up in such a way that women can easily exploit it."
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:06 PM
138

That was extremely well written. This is what true egalitarianism looks like.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:45 PM
4

The next step is convincing people that a lot of these problems are actually not gendered, but happen to everyone. My personal goal as an MRA is to challenge the idea that a "violence against women" approach is the correct way to tackle domestic violence.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:42 PM
1

I spent about $450 on my future wife's engagement ring and she absolutely loves it. And that price includes a lifetime guarantee and free treatment.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:23 PM
1

Since when are feminists for brothels? Sex positive feminists would be. Gender feminists, not so much.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:15 PM
13

The disparity could be partly due to the fact that mothers have custody more often. I wonder what these stats look like when controlled for custody. In other words, if parents had equal custody time, would more abuse by fathers start showing up? Or would women still be the majority of abusers?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:11 PM
5

It doesn't really have anything to do with men's rights. Actually it's very clearly about women.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 02:17 PM
3

Irrelevant.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:44 PM
2

"I think that if half of the cabinet were women and half of the Supreme Court and half of Congress were women, we would see a lot more policies for expanding education and health care and social services that allow communities to thrive,” O’Neill explained. “We’d see a lot less spending on military weapons systems, and we would also see a lot less of the most powerful, moneyed people not paying their fair share.” This is as close to saying "men bad, women good" as you can get without actually sa…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 01:33 PM
1

That was it. Thanks!
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:13 PM
3

false rape claims are good as it makes the man introspective and think about how he could have raped her, even if he did not. There is actually a quote from a fairly prominent feminist saying just this. I wish I could find it.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:08 PM
3

Not a bad counterpoint.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:55 PM
1

Huffington Post is terrible. Under the article, there a bunch of pictures of related stories, and they all feature summaries making light of sexual assault. Utter garbage.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:48 PM
2

I couldn't agree more. Feminism does not do an adequate job of addressing men's rights, which is why we have our own movement.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:55 PM
23

"Men Working" is clearly an offensive way to describe men working. Seriously though, we should probably all check our respective privileges./s
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:17 PM
9

This is why we have /r/mrmemes
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:07 PM
107

Male only perpetrators of sexual assault? I'm not even surprised any more.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:45 PM
1

"Female on male violence is bad because it leads to male on female violence."
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:59 PM
-1

This is not a safe space. It's a space for open discussion of men's rights.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 01:44 PM
4

This is NOT /r/antifeminism. This doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 01:43 PM
1

I've seen a couple of these in action. But yeah, a lot are extremely over dramatic.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 01:39 PM
1

There is definitely a wage gap. It's just not wholly caused by discrimination.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 01:35 PM
2

I would love to see the justification for having this banned.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 01:20 PM
10

Yes. Wow, even after almost two years of hanging out on /r/MensRights, I used women only in my example of rape. I'm actually kinda shocked that male rape didn't occur to me. Some programming can be really hard to undo.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 10:11 PM
4

Yes, men are victims of domestic violence too, but more women are. Who cares? Why is it "One is too many" when it's violence against women but "not that many" when it comes to violence against men? Seriously, why can't we make gender neutral laws that help everyone? How hard would it be to create an initiative to stop domestic violence that wasn't specifically targeted at one gender?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 10:04 PM
11

Honestly, I'm torn. Girls growing up are often taught "don't get raped", which really sucks. However, rape culture is defined as "a culture in which rape and sexual violence are common and in which prevalent attitudes, norms, practices, and media normalize, excuse, tolerate, or even condone rape." Common? Maybe. I can't look up stats right now. Excused? By some, but not the majority. Tolerated? Absolutely not.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:58 PM
3

I misspoke. I meant to say the term "gender-based violence" is useless in terms of domestic violence. If I start beating my girlfriend, it's probably going to be over an argument or something between the two of us. It wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that she is a woman. Targeting a gender for violence is gender-based violence, and in that case the phrase makes sense. But domestic violence is not about gender.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:36 PM
13

Absolutely agree. This is /r/MensRights, not /r/MensOutrage.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:01 PM
7

I agree. It's purely used for deception. The phrase itself makes no sense unless you believe that domestic violence doesn't happen to men.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:46 PM
1

Pointless.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:40 PM
7

"Gender violence" is such a useless phrase. If we take it as meaning "gender directed towards someone who identifies as a gender", that is literally all adult violence. "Gender violence" is just a more "equality-minded" version of "violence against women." EDIT: Sorry, useless is a bad word. I am fully aware that people are sometimes targeted for violence by their gender. I just think the phrase is being used dishonestly here.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:35 PM
2

I don't think it should be downvoted, but I can understand why many might prefer /r/MensRights to /r/Egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:46 PM
2

I've been subbed to this for a while. Unfortunately, it doesn't have many users so posts are very infrequent.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 05:27 PM
1

I agree. But feminism is extremely vocal in Western society about Western issues.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 05:04 PM
2

I'm sorry his reality clashes with your assumptions.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:25 PM
4

Honestly I would love to hear a well-reasoned explanation for this.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:06 PM
25

A lot of non-radical feminists believe in patriarchy, rape culture, and the wage gape.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:56 PM
8

This. Also NSFW NSFL.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:51 PM
1

When guys go out, its to fuck women. Projecting much?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:15 PM
0

OH SHIT! You showed him.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:58 PM
1

It started out so well. And then it turned this into a women's issue.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:53 PM
1

Relevant.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:09 PM
2

Yet whenever men claim to not have privilege, we are laughed at.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 01:51 PM
3

This is not the norm.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 01:38 PM
2

I don't think you can cite anecdotal evidence.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:41 PM
8

I get what you're saying, but the majority of "consent-teaching" is aimed specifically at males. http://www.whiteribbon.ca/
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:10 AM
43

I feel like both "don't get raped" and "don't rape" are terrible messages. I think we should teach kids about consent as early as possible.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:43 PM
30

Sexualized violence does not just affect women. Hmm...sounds promising. It affects the men who care about them, their families, their friends, their coworkers, and their communities. Well, nevermind.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:39 PM
1

Neopaleoprogressivist? Does that mean "new old progressivist"?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:20 PM
1

I'm torn on this. Statistics show that males are more likely to get into wrecks than females, so higher prices for males seems fair. But like others have said, for things like health insurance this logic would not fly if women were charged more due their higher expected costs.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:18 PM
1

Such a nice mod.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:15 PM
1

Are men not capable of committing acts of violence of their own volition?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:14 PM
2

Really? Who specifically?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 05:03 PM
1

Link to the original?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:06 PM
13

kindly stop trying to tell us it's ONLY us guilty of this. She didn't say that. You're kinda putting words in her mouth here.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:40 AM
9

Typhonblue is very well written.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 10:06 PM
1

I agrre. There is way too much over-generalization going on in both groups. Radical feminists who spew anti-male rhetoric give the entire movement a bad name. The same problem is starting to happen to the MRM now that we are getting more popular. Every now and then, some idiot mistakes this place for the Women Hater's club and spews misogyny. MRAs oppose feminists when they try to curtail the rights of men and spread malicious lies. Non-bigoted feminists like yourself should be doing the same.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:26 PM
1

There's no "hierarchy" of need. In theory, men's and women's issues should be given equal priority. But I don't feel as though the Men's Rights movement is being heard. Society at large is either not hearing about our issues or just doesn't care. On the other hand, feminism has a well established lobbying system and infrastructure already in place. And it doesn't help when people who identify as feminists try to silence us.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:38 PM
2

Honestly, I think it looks better inside but it feels wrong. It should be on the outside because it does terminate the sentence, but it looks weird because I've always been taught that it belongs on the inside.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:22 PM
3

It looks weird both ways. =(
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:11 PM
1

I had a male feminist tell me that there are no real men's issues and even if there were, we needed to fix women's issues first. I'm not saying he is representative of the movement at large, but he had to have learned that rhetoric somewhere.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:10 PM
3

I'm guessing by normal he meant "not a porn star." EDIT: Does the period go on the inside or outside of the quotation mark?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:50 PM
1

Not MR related at all.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:45 PM
9

I am circumcised and completely fine with it. It's the only penis I remember having.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:38 PM
1

I can't even remember the last time I went to a doctor for a check up.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:34 PM
2

It was posted at least twice yesterday IIRC. Who karma whores in Men's Rights? That's just weird.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 01:55 PM
2

How do we know she is unqualified to be a sports commentator? It's sexist to assume she isn't based on her gender.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 06:32 PM
2

Well said. I wasn't sure if the case was being labelled as 'unfounded' or 'false'. Obviously she shouldn't be charged if they cannot prove a rape happened, but if they have proof that nothing happened then it's completely different.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 02:54 PM
107

Eyewitness testimony is so useless.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 02:13 PM
1

Hmm... I don't see anywhere the COTWA post or the referenced article saying that she admitted to lying. It's repeated numerous times that it is a false report but: Police gave no additional details as to how they discovered that the woman’s allegation was false I'm all for punishing people who falsely accuse others of rape, but is there enough evidence to say she lied?
/r/MensRights28/11/12 02:06 PM
1

What would the "Paycheck Fairness Act" even do, really? If the wage gap due to discrimination is very small, will a law against discrimination really change the wage gap? If the law does pass, it'll be really interesting to see what happens when the wage gap doesn't vanish.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:28 PM
5

I hope it does, but at the same time that would probably not go well either.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 07:59 PM
60

People say 99% when they can't get away with saying 100%. Because 100% is absurd and apparently they think 99% sounds completely plausible.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:34 PM
1

Did you just post a nearly identical comment with two accounts?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:36 PM
1

How so? I'm not sure I see it.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:30 PM
3

You said you were forced out of teaching by sexism. I was wondering if you had any specific examples.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:34 PM
2

What kind of sexism? Can you elaborate?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:26 PM
2

We're just typically a bit less vocal about ignorant political statements. *Reads comment* Huh.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 05:28 PM
3

Agreed. $15k is chump change.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 05:20 PM
1

There is actually a lot of data on this already. They use interviews and records to go back and look at separated twins or siblings and look at criminal involvement of both parents and children. I don't remember the study off the top of my head, but it was interesting stuff.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:45 PM
0

As someone who just bought his fiancee a cheap but beautiful engagement ring, the thought of what anyone who is not receiving the ring is the last thing on my mind. Fuck social pressures. A man acts, a slave obeys.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:38 PM
7

This seems pretty tame to me.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 01:39 PM
2

-Michael Scott
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:49 PM
6

Does this mean that New Hampshire is a Patriarchy free zone?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 04:58 PM
31

I believe a while back one of the developers of God of War: Ascension said they were trying to cut back on the violence against women in the new game. I had to struggle count the number of women characters killed in the series, while the deaths that are the goriest and most gruesome were all of male characters.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:38 PM
-1

It's likening a PS Vita to a woman.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:14 PM
2

Men are cocks and women are pussies. Hehe.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:01 PM
2

The propensity for and alcoholism is genetic. That means that someone with those genes is more likely to become an alcoholic. Personally, I don't this is a good excuse because drinking alcohol, which can lead to alcoholism, is a conscious choice.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 03:47 PM
2

A lot of people argue that drug addictions are a disease and that addicts should be treated, not jailed. While I somewhat agree with this for nonviolent offenders, I think it would be fun to look at how many males are given leniency compared to women. And by fun I mean depressing.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 03:23 PM
2

And if you are donating your own money voluntarily, good for you.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 12:30 PM
-4

Seriously. Unless it's directly mentioned, just don't bring it up. EDIT: In other people's discussions, that is.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 12:26 PM
1

Totally agree. But with punishments for false accusers need to come the stipulation that not enough evidence =/= false accusation. It would be terrible for rape victims to be sent to jail because there wasn't enough evidence to catch their rapist.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 12:18 PM
1

How so? I've heard this point of view before but don't quite understand it.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 08:44 PM
2

Like IAmYuri posted, I think that anonymity should be maintained for both parties until the indictment by the grand jury. This is when it is determined if there is enough evidence to go to trial.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 07:57 PM
1

I disagree. I think both should be anonymous, as being accused of rape and actually being raped has a horrible social stigma attached to it.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 07:55 PM
4

We can't make jokes on reddit. The Internet is serious business.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:50 PM
1

Fuck that. There are more than two choices.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 07:29 PM
5

That's not even enough to cover the court costs of the wrongfully accused guy, assuming he hired representation.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 07:22 PM
1

Does anyone have a source for the training materials? It looks like the link is broken.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 07:19 PM
1

The tips for women are actually pretty reasonable, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 01:06 PM
8

Myth: Women lie about being raped, especially when they accuse men they date or other acquaintances. Fact: Rape really happens -- to people you know, by people you know. If you claim that women may occasionally lie about rape, you deny that it ever happens.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 01:03 PM
2

What class was this?
/r/MensRights31/10/12 12:19 PM
2

It was the first animal I thought of.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:45 PM
2

Like this?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:22 PM
3

So many of these are "OMG I hate that my opinions and actions are not validated by 100% of society, I'm oppressed."
/r/MensRights29/10/12 06:04 PM
4

Probably because it's a really insensitive thing to do regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:06 PM
1

He defends the sexualization or sexual abuse of minor females on the grounds of “consent” or “willingness.” This is telling.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:48 PM
2

"There isn't discrimination at my place of work, therefore wage discrimination doesn't happen anywhere." Is that your argument or am I missing something?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:33 PM
22

"He knocked her up" "He got her pregnant" It takes two to tango.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:28 PM
7

This isn't relevant.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:26 PM
9

This seems a bit harsh. Why is she a cunt?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:25 PM
6

What exactly is "hypergamy"? I've seen the word around but I'm not sure what it means.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:23 PM
3

For me it is. I've been subscribed to this subreddit for around a year, I think. Since then, MR's subscribers have nearly doubled. We've gone from being a relatively unknown sub to one that is often being talked about in the mainstream subs, and it's often in a positive light. Our message seems to be spreading, at least on Reddit, and that in my opinion is worth celebrating.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:20 PM
3

Maybe some people don't think it is meaningless. Your opinion is not a universal truth.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:25 PM
5

Oh, so you're not claiming that 100% of women are a certain way, you are claiming that only 98% are that way. Sorry if we misunderstood you. The 2% difference is obviously not trivial and completely changes the sentiment behind your statement.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:40 PM
6

GUYS STOP BEING HAPPY.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:27 PM
2

Great post. I shared this on Facebook and it's getting a lot of people angry in a really good way.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:28 PM
8

Women's issues have been a huge part of this election.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:45 PM
6

It seems like they are giving up on all pretenses of caring about equal rights for the women of their country.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:49 PM
1

I love this response. If you are offended, do something about it. If you aren't offended, don't try and be offended by it on principle.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:04 PM
1

Why do we have to look at everyone as a man or woman? Why can't we just see people as people?
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:53 PM
1

This definition doesn't include spousal rape though.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:46 PM
3

I kinda see it as being similar to an argument about locking your doors. If you lock your door, a good person will try to open it, fail, and then stop trying to get into the house. A burglar will not care that your door is locked; he will climb in through the window and steal your shit anyways. Realistically, protective orders are ineffective at preventing assault.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:03 PM
2

It won't just be because of this. It's been known for a while that protective orders are often useless and can even incite violence.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:59 PM
29

Hairless = childlike = pedophile
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:24 PM
6

Same here. I actually liked what I was reading at first. I thought it might go somewhere interesting. Then all of a sudden, patriarchy.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:21 PM
9

Hehehe. Like penises.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:54 PM
1

Dude, all you do is comment on how stupid women are. Why are you even here?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:05 PM
2

What you just described is babysitting, which is not the same thing as being a homemaker.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:48 PM
2

Okay then. Explain to me how a sample size of 160 is large enough to make generalizations about the rest of the world's population.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:42 PM
4

Only 160 people? That sample size is awful small.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:45 PM
1

It's raining downvotes in here.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:43 PM
0

You have any proof?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:52 PM
-1

Is there proof that SRS was involved with the VA doxxing, or this about a different doxxing?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:37 PM
41

Flip the genders and it would probably be considered assault. While I agree that it doesn't look like he was injured, the definition of assault also includes an act that causes a fear of violence or threat of violence. Edit: Battery requires physical contact, but assault does not.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 12:52 PM
5

I don't think it was terrible. The law itself didn't force employers to change how they paid employees, it changed the restrictions on pay discrimination lawsuits. Which does some to be a very half-hearted attempt at correcting the wage gap, considering how much Obama talks about it.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 12:09 PM
0

Not really. It shows that you are cautious.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:20 PM
3

Out of curiosity, would physical size be a factor when choosing a female roommate?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:59 PM
-1

Seriously, how old are you?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:57 AM
4

Proof?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:03 AM
-1

You are using sexual shaming language in a men's rights subreddit. Who's the idiot?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:54 AM
1

Huh. I didn't see a single source or even an unverified statistic supporting their "findings." How about that.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:31 AM
2

In text it makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:28 AM
3

Found one of the ads he was talking about.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:26 AM
1

Funding for female only salary negotiation training? That's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:17 AM
1

Huh. I might be thinking of something completely different. I thought I remembered that earlier this year there was some kind of equal pay legislation being talked about on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 04:44 PM
3

You can't fight hate with hate.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 02:15 PM
1

Privilege. Privilege everywhere.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 01:13 PM
1

This is rambling and incoherent.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 06:41 PM
12

They want trigger warnings for spiders, snakes, and insects? How the hell do they go outside?
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:31 PM
-1

I don't get it.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:50 PM
8

Are these actual words? Seriously, there is so much unfamiliar jargon going on here.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:28 PM
1

Lawyering up was a good first step. I would naturally try to avoid her as much as possible and document any chance interactions you might have with her.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:24 PM
3

women are natrual liers and manipulators by nature of evolution Please go somewhere else to spew unintelligent hate.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:21 PM
8

Because obviously his/her opinion's validity is determined by magic Internet points.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:37 PM
1

I often see it quoted in terms of average median income for both genders.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:44 PM
0

Your spelling sickens me. Do you actually read what you write? And how does arguing that not all women will abuse this website equate to being a white knight?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 08:42 PM
1

I completely forgot that last month was prostate cancer awareness month. In contrast, I've been bombarded with ads about breast cancer and it's only the 5th. It's sad :(
/r/MensRights05/10/12 07:16 PM
15

I feel like an easy way clear this up would be mandatory paternity testing. But I don't know feasible that would be.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 07:12 PM
6

Why not just call it /r/witchhunt?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:25 PM
6

I feel like you are speaking code with those numbers. I wish I knew metric :(
/r/MensRights02/10/12 12:52 PM
6

Exactly. It's not like she tacked on a sweeping generalization at the end saying "All men are like this."
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:08 PM
6

You don't need to be a man to care about men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:38 PM
-2

I never said that. Are you going to provide some basis for your belief that male and female sex drives are scientifically different?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:47 PM
-1

If you can't provide one then I have to assume you just pulled that 'fact' out of your ass. Based on experience, sex drives vary from person to person for BOTH genders. I have a fairly low sex drive and my girlfriend would be fine with sex twice a day or more. If you have some information that claims otherwise, feel free to post it.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:28 PM
1

Welcome!
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:14 PM
0

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:56 PM
14

I am so tired of seeing Mr. Mom.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:14 PM
2

Just yell OBJECTION!
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:42 PM
24

Men can stop rape. Since rape still happens, men obviously aren't stopping it. Men aren't stopping rape because they hate women. Men are misogynist by nature. It's all very reasonable. It simply relies on a fact that is actually an opinion.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:06 PM
3

One in three? That statistic keeps getting higher every time I see it.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:43 PM
4

There are sure to plenty of psychological problems for both men and women though.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 06:58 PM
9

So much excusing.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:28 PM
2

He's not a sock puppet, he just happened to read the entire article and comment 120 seconds after it was posted.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 04:42 PM
7

Blaming a victim of abuse for staying with her abuser? As a child with no other recourse? Downvotes for you, sir.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 01:01 PM
7

A man chooses. A slave obeys.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:38 PM
4

I never said that only male policy-makers prevent equal rights. I was simply stating that it isn't just female activists and politicians who promote ideas that create gender inequality. You said it yourself. most feminist organisations and women want to be able to serve in the military, and consequently be signed up for the draft. Its the (predominantly male) politicians that prevent the rules from being changed
/r/MensRights31/08/12 12:33 PM
16

You make a good point. It's important to realize that the men's rights movement is not men vs women. There are plenty of male policymakers that are preventing equal rights for both genders.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 12:11 PM
1

Why did you post it then?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:57 PM
2

Sadly this would probably work.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 03:46 PM
3

I don't think a single person here thinks that the man should pay for all the rent.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 06:24 PM
1

Interesting. Could you link to it?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:54 PM
2

Primary aggressor laws. They started off as a way to keep from "re-victimizing" women who were victims of abuse and now they are used as gender profiling to arrest men.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 10:08 PM
1

Get help.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 08:41 PM
1

Hate is never justified.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 02:53 PM
1

Both boys are in foster care, one in a home run by a single mother with five other children. Because a single mother with six kids to take care of will be a better guardian than a dad with two. +10 to logic
/r/MensRights24/06/12 02:52 AM
10

Well, if she's sorry then all the harm is undone, right?
/r/MensRights24/06/12 02:30 AM
1

It looks like the posted quote is incomplete, but the full version still completely ignores the losses suffered by men in the exact same situations.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 02:21 AM
13

Does anyone have a source for this quote?
/r/MensRights23/06/12 11:56 PM
1

That's good. I was just surprised that It wasn't featured in the OP's article.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:47 AM
6

So even though it's been legally proven that she wasn't a victim of rape/assault, she still gets the beneficial treatment of anonymity given to rape victims?
/r/MensRights16/06/12 09:01 PM
5

Why wasn't her name released?
/r/MensRights16/06/12 03:26 PM
3

Not intentional, but it's along those lines. My girlfriend recently got a really short haircut (a pixie cut). At a glance, she might pass as a boy. One day not long after the new haircut, she tells me a story of how she was walking behind a group of girls who flipped out when they saw her. She wasn't being "creepy" or anything, just walking behind them on the way to school in broad daylight. One of the girls shrieked but then immediately calmed down when she realized that my girlfriend was actua…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:14 AM
1

Which is not always the person who initiated physical violence. It seems like the criteria for establishing primary aggressor is designed to limit police officer discretion and only arrest the person that is probably the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 02:24 PM
1

Page 8 of the first link.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 02:22 PM
3

Oh my god. “Be ready for audience members to protest that predominant aggressor is really just creating or reinforcing a gender bias against men,” “Remind them that, by and large, abusers are men and victims are women.” That's disgusting.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 04:57 AM
-1

How cute.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 04:03 AM
1

What is Poe's Law?
/r/MensRights28/05/12 02:38 AM
1

It's about time.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:06 PM
3

Because all issues are men's issues, duh! /s
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:25 AM
1

I'm not saying this is isn't an important issue, but this exact Google definition has been posted on here several times. At this point, it's like preaching to the choir.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 11:06 PM
-17

Ah, the weekly "this is a terrible definition of rape" post.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:38 PM
1

I'm not sure this belongs here.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 01:10 AM
2

This is also the same for a lot of public restrooms. I don't see any reason why they shouldn't both be hidden. Also, the asymetry bothers me.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 08:12 PM
-7

Idiot works just fine. Stupid works too. Throwing the word retard around is not okay.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 07:36 PM
-5

No. Downvoted for using retard as an insult. We are not in grade school anymore.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 04:39 PM
0

Well look who it is.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 04:45 PM
193

It's funny because she documented herself committing a crime.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:23 PM
1

It wasn't just the right to vote and you know it.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:54 AM
1

Good luck! Please update us on how it goes.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:53 PM
1

Why is Facebook being taken so seriously lately? I understand in this case that this is a police officer, but what happened to free speech?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:44 PM
1

I think the OP means to emphasize the idea of the disposable male in reference to the Titanic. But you are right. Men had much greater legal standing back then.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 04:40 PM
1

In his defense, we have been continually trolled lately. Your post seems to be trying to invoke a very unpopular reaction.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 06:54 AM
10

I still can't think of a good reason why this isn't law.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:07 PM
7

She is now facing "possible charges of sexual assault."
/r/MensRights12/04/12 07:52 PM
2

Not reverse sexist, just sexist.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 11:41 PM
1

Even then it's still not extremely relevant. Posts like this just make us look like whining children.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 06:49 PM
8

This is /r/mensrights, not /r/feministssuck.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 04:35 PM
6

And this is relevant to us because...?
/r/MensRights11/04/12 04:32 PM
2

Because men's problems are different from women's problems and need to be treated differently.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:21 PM
2

The prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for long term planning, isn't fully developed until age 25.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 02:58 PM
4

Honestly, I don't think there's anything wrong with an initiative that tries to stop violence against women. The problem is when there is no similar drive to stop violence against men. The language in this is extremely gendered though, and it seems that they aren't interested in helping men.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:04 PM
0

$550 fine plus $6000 restitution.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 04:20 PM
59

This title is a bit misleading. In addition to the $550 fine, she also has to pay $6000 in restitution. Also, the brackets are implying a gendered context that was never in the father's statement. I'm not trying to downplay the injustice of this, but your title is overly editorialized.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 04:19 PM
14

It's still bad, I agree. But like the OP said, it's progress.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 11:25 PM
3

You really don't see how these ads promote gender values and stereotypes?
/r/MensRights03/04/12 11:23 PM
4

That's the worst thing you could do.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 02:57 PM
1

No?
/r/MensRights03/04/12 05:08 AM
1

I really don't see a problem with this. Trivializing rape isn't funny.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 04:06 AM
1

Video removed :(
/r/MensRights02/04/12 05:17 AM
1

It's only advertised to keep MEN from cheating, maybe that's why.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 05:04 PM
5

Geeze this is dense? Can someone summarize?
/r/MensRights26/03/12 04:51 PM
3

It seems like a few of the top comments are actually defending the men's rights movement. Don't be so quick to assume it's all badmouthing.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 04:09 PM
5

It's fine, I was just bewildered by the sheer number of responses that were like "WTF are you gay?"
/r/MensRights22/03/12 08:58 PM
1

Do you have any evidence that they don't support this?
/r/MensRights22/03/12 08:55 PM
4

You should really mention in the title that this is a cross-post.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 08:17 PM
9

Sounds like the entrance price to clubs/bars.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 07:57 PM
2

Out of curiosity, how does this site work?
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:35 AM
1

Wow. I completely misread that comment.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 01:42 AM
2

Sexism is sexism FTFY
/r/MensRights02/03/12 03:12 PM
-5

Do you have a source for this? I've always heard the opposite. ALWAYS.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 03:11 PM
1

Just don't feed the troll.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 12:23 AM
3

Thanks for sharing. Also your tl;dr is pure gold.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 06:11 AM
5

You are a saint.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 03:34 AM
1

TIL that women are unable to control their impulses and need to be taken care of.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 05:02 PM
1

My mistake. And thanks for the polite correction.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 05:00 PM
1

She was not spared jail. She received 18 months jail time which was suspended for a year. So she's still going to jail.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 02:51 PM
2

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights03/11/11 02:05 PM
1

Better late than never, I suppose.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 02:03 PM
1

Seriously. It's not an untrue statement to say that women are hurt or are in danger.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 06:06 AM
43

I feel like having the man take a paternity test before making him pay child support could easily have prevented this.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 02:04 AM
3

Nice constructive feedback.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 08:02 PM
5

It's also important to know if he was capable of consenting.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 03:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter