TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lolobviously Archive

View 6 posts and 1,270 comments by lolobviously on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,270 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Misogyny, just like toxic, has become a buzzword among those who arent among the ranks of the 3rd wave feminists. Now you know. Of course feminists hate people that hate woman. Attacking the strawman and moving the goalposts all in one.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 08:37 AM
3

Feminists don't hate men, they hate misogynists. This is an incredibly broad and totally unprovable statement. Dragging yourself into the leftist buzzword using retard brigade with that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 08:29 AM
3

Its meaningless if you spout it off and aim it at a huge group of people. Like if I said all feminists were misandrists that would be meaningless. On that note, go get mad at feminists for hating men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 08:09 AM
2

They work on disingenuous woman, who TRP seem to resent. How would you even know? I use my knowledge of SMP dynamics in my LTR and my partner is a gorgeous sweetheart who treats me like a king, I couldnt be happier. I see plenty of hatred and dislike for woman and girls on TRP. Probably, I couldnt care less and I have no idea why you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 07:51 AM
2

Misogyny has unfortunately become a meaningless buzzword, just like toxic, its has been adulterated by retards misusing it. Dude I know how to get women, you dont need to tell me that they need to be interested in me as a person, but those strats and games you dont like work for a lot of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 07:47 AM
6

They're genuine if they are attracted to you and or respect you as a man. So thats good for you that you are attractive or well respected by women. Its good for me too, because I dont have too many issues, but I see it all around me, and I watch the girls Ive plated do it to other guys. Its not that I dont give a fuck, anyone why isnt left wing will ignore you when you start spouting off practically meaningless feminist buzzwords. If you want people to take you seriously in any gender dynamic co…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 07:42 AM
2

Why even enter the debate with such poor strawman arguments? I gave you my definition and there you go attacking some other version of awalt. Why would I bother?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 07:32 AM
1

So you admit that some woman have different preferences in regards to traits of their partner? Well that alone disproves AWALT Honestly, with these kinds of statements do you expect me to put effort into this discussion and take you seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 07:29 AM
7

I think youll find that they are straight men trying to get better at having relationships with women. They probably like the company of women. What angers them is the underhanded tactics women use in the relationship game, in their opinion. Why do you care, go eat some ham and lurk elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 07:28 AM
8

They arent negative, they are just human.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 07:23 AM
2

I think its "Benefits someone but not me"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 07:14 AM
3

No one is selfless. Women as a whole have better social skills and social cunning than men. I didnt imply the man needs to be domineering, but the vast majority of women sure prefer it. Yes men and women define love and respect differently, this has been discussed to dead in PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 07:11 AM
2

Its a reminder that all women are driven by self interest in the same way that men are, and that women will use their social skills and cunning to get what they want at the expense of men that they do not respect. To a degree its an extension on how women and men typically have different personal definitions of the word respect, and love.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 06:59 AM
11

Define toxic pls.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 06:56 AM
-1

No its not. You are way wrong here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 06:55 AM
9

Because you dont understand it. Your attacking a strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 06:55 AM
6

until an alpha man can sweep them off their feet and show them their place, THAT is what is ridiculous. Umm.. and that bit?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 06:39 AM
5

duplicity Women exist that have never been deceitful?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 06:32 AM
12

They are women, so they have different goals, the use RP to get those goals. They discuss how to use RP beliefs about relationships to help them as women, be successful at getting the men that women want, just like TRP uses RP beliefs to get the women that men want.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 06:24 AM
8

women using cunning and duplicity is a ridiculous notion? Are you for real, or do I misunderstand you?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 06:22 AM
3

Machiavellian : "the employment of cunning and duplicity in statecraft or in general conduct" To any outsider, this comes across as quite ridiculous. Seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 06:05 AM
1

It works exactly like paying people more. If his business benefits from higher pay great, legislating this for all business is stupid. While he may pay then in terms of leave, he may pay them less in terms of per hour, or perhaps the working conditions are worse than his competitors, or perhaps.. Looks, its basic market force economics, If you dont get it now you wont ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 02:46 AM
1

I did read it, but its beside the point. Look, stay a lower class worker drone forever, and never attempt to run a business. You couldnt do it, you cant even consider the drives that the business owner has.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 02:06 AM
2

It just has nothing to do with overall economic benefit. You didnt watch the video I linked, or else you wouldnt be approaching me this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 12:59 AM
1

Preconceived doesnt mean based on nothing it means -"To form (an opinion, for example) before possessing full or adequate knowledge or experience." If someone has a watch on, and I would like the time, my preconceived prejudice is that the person is likely to be personable enough to tell me the time if I politely ask, because as a general rule, most people are. This is a perfectly acceptable prejudice, caused by a preconceived opinion of a person I have never met. This is literally how we as hum…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 12:54 AM
9

Theres not such thing as -THE- right girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 12:41 AM
1

Mine had a count of 1. First night lay.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 12:27 AM
1

It keeps some people employed while keeping others out altogether. You could make it work if both genders took it equally but then you would still be causing prejudice against the young.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 12:22 AM
1

How else are you supposed to do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 12:02 AM
1

Business DO discriminate in a tonne of different ways, and for good reason, and always will. So you can make it worse by supporting affirmative action and maternity leave or not. That's up to you. As a young man, I for one support it, selfishly.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 12:00 AM
1

Strength comes in many forms. It may be new to you but it's well founded. If you are willing g to hurt every young woman looking for a job so that some may get paid to not work, that's really not my problem, I'm a young white man, who is self employed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 09:28 PM
1

I think we agree here
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 09:00 AM
1

Its not so obvious to many left wingers in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 05:57 AM
1

They get paid less because they are more expensive in other areas, per unit of production. Making women even more expensive in the form of the chance of maternity means that only one of 2 things can happen, less pay on average than even now, or less employment. You must be worth paying extra, congrats.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 05:51 AM
1

Do they get paid less all else equal?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 05:45 AM
1

Because the free market doesnt pay every woman to leave work while she gives birth and cares for a newborn. The govt artificially increases the cost. The increased cost necessarily reduces sales, in this case the sale of labour.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 05:33 AM
1

Its an artificial increased cost. Supply demand and price, all work the same regardless of what is being bought or sold, including labour. Increases in price without an increase in demand reduces sales. Straight forward stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 05:26 AM
2

Now we have someone with common sense on board. Of course she is a risk without the legislation, however she is even more of a risk with it. It further increases her costs to business, even more so that just being a woman on its own.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 04:54 AM
1

prejudice Is prejudgement. It is used to make decisions when only general information is available. It is the best and only method of judging a person, action, or decision when the specific personal details are not available, such as when legislation makes it illegal to ask personal questions during interviews.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 04:50 AM
0

No joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 04:09 AM
2

You dont understand key, basic economic points. Its genuinely hard to talk to you about this stuff because you think that the economy is about money, when even the most basic classes will tell you that its about the use of scarce resources. Forget it. I dont think this conversation can happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 03:48 AM
1

The mother already knows if the test needs to be taken..
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 03:46 AM
2

Im not from america so I dont know what that means. What do you refute? My definition of wealth? How wealth is produced? I cant see how you could refute any of that, but Im keen to hear it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 03:17 AM
2

Do you realise that wealth is access to services and products? Yes/No. Do you realise that paying people to not work, incentivises less work. Do you realise that less work means less production and provision of good and services? Overall this means less wealth for our society. Again game theory explains why even if what you are saying was significant it would never be implemented by business owners, and for good reason. As a result the kind of legislation you seem to champion continues to hurt w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 03:06 AM
3

I have read some, and even checked the sources and the studies in them. One of the authors of one study cites himself as a source of his own graphs... The whole thing is incredibly biased, even the opening few paragraphs imply things but do not openly state them because they cannot. One of the studies mentioned shows an improvement in the business that have women on board in the recent few years and totally fails mention the data that they also display which shows that in the few years previous …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 03:04 AM
2

If that is your genuine answer, I cannot help you. You lack even the most basic understanding of economics and how wealth is created.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 02:59 AM
2

They can make money, after their pregnancy?? Serious? Its not mandatory to employ pregnancy aged women. Employers use the knowledge they have that those women will cost more and they choose to employ other women. Or men. And if you force employers to have those specific groups of women on the payroll you only serve to raise the bar for women in business and price everyone but the very best women out of business. Additionally, how are we supposed to have shit to buy if we incentivise people to no…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 02:53 AM
2

No you're missing the point. If you are an individual employer, you alone and your decisions do not significantly affect society in any, or the taxes you pay through the kind of advantages you refer to. Even if what you are saying is significant (significant overall saving by employing women and paying them to be pregnant etc as opposed to a 0.5% decrease in income due to tax) which I cannot possibly believe.. But even if it were significant, the individual will still choose the better candidate…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 02:44 AM
1

Well when women have more info about their child than a man, its unequal. In this instance equality is good for the man. When women are given less respect in a conversation about hunting its unequal. In this instance equality is good for the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 02:37 AM
3

Genuinely, go speak to a business or or 5 and find out if what you are saying registers. They have different beliefs as a group than you do. So as a result your leftist policies hurts those who most need it. Just like when you give women a leg up industry evens it out with prejudice, when you start putting blacks through university at unnatural rates and holding back Asians and white employers get even more prejudiced against them, because do you employ the black girl who may or may not have ear…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 02:24 AM
2

They aren't the employers problem, and they don't have any direct results on the employer. Maternity leave makes women more costly to employ than men. This simply means that the women who are employed are employed at a slightly higher pay rate than the equivalent man, but they have to be slightly better to make up for it. It essentially prices average young women out of the market in comparison to average young men. It's just like raising the minimum wage. Until you realise how employers and bus…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 02:02 AM
2

Well why is society worse off. And overall, how do you force employers to care? They don't, as a result these policies hurt women overall. Sorry, but it's true that as long as women punish employers for choosing them, employers will prefer men. For example.its illegal to ask young women if they are thinking of having children, the result is that the employer must assume that the average birthrate in her age group applies to her, and women overall have a disadvantage, whether they will or will no…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 01:40 AM
2

My point exactly, Id be willing to bet you have never even considered whether it can. Employers looking for candidates in the young family age, 22-30, in countries with maternity leave are even more likely to choose an equaly qualified and experienced candidate who is male than they normally would be because he represents less risk. If you had 2 identical people (and lets be honest the employer is already biased towards the guy for most roles because he is stronger and is willing to be more flex…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 01:02 AM
2

even if female CEOs are, overall, less likely to take wild risks with the share holder's money. Its a shame that they are, overall, less succesful with the shareholders money I love how you are risk averse (probably a woman) and you champion those who are also risk averse (women as a group and specifically CEOs) and you totally neglect to mention lack of overall success. hahahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 12:56 AM
1

Unless the prejudices are fair and are helping those who havnt had the same level of opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 12:52 AM
2

You know that there are good and very real reasons to be biased towards a gender in many situations, right? Because the world is a free market for the most part most of the govt incentives to help, say women, infact hinder many women. Things like quotas in business, incentives in education and maternity leave all adversely affect women, but because women sway hard left typically they will not ever understand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 12:50 AM
6

Not all women have a G spot. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA "Not all women have a nose"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/16 12:46 AM
1

Well in each particular area its good for whomever currently has the least of something thats desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 11:16 PM
1

Not sarcasm. Equality is fucking fantastic for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 11:43 AM
1

That doesnt follow logically. No matter its easy to do in secret and many will continue to do so, giving men the same knowledge women have about their children. Isnt equality great !
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 03:59 AM
1

Subjective. That's a matter of opinion. Comes down to how important knowing who the father is.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 02:56 AM
1

Define right please.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 02:27 AM
1

Absolutely none of that changes that he's best to not tell her.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 02:05 AM
1

In other words you can't defend against my position.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 01:47 AM
1

So for what reason should be ask permission, from his perspective?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 01:30 AM
1

How would she find out? And why on earth would the guy choose for her to find out if she is infact innocent, how does this benefit him?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 12:48 AM
1

1- Im really not sure this is true. 2- Yep, I said other than this. 3- While an ugly woman with a job is better than an ugly women with no job we arent discussing a job vs no job we are discussing pursuing a career aggressively vs not pursuing a career aggressively. This point is moot because it has nothing to do with what we are discussing. 4- I really dont think women gain social status in terms of society treating them better when they are aggressive career pursuers. 5- Only to the same exten…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 12:42 AM
1

Here are the scenarios. He doesn't think she cheated. No test. He does think she cheated. Secret test. She is a whore, now she knows he suspected she cheated, which makes no difference because she actually is a whore. He does think she cheated. Asks for test. Turns out she cheated. Same result as above but she might try and block him. So this is a worse strategy for him, but if he gets the test and she did cheat it's the same outcome for her as above. He does think she cheated. Secret test. She …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 12:22 AM
1

I'm saying overall, with the exception of having more money in her personal account, what advantage does she get?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 12:16 AM
1

Obviously, so its best he does it without mentioning it to her. How are you blind to this?!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 12:11 AM
1

So how is she further valued by men in proceeding with this path?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 12:06 AM
1

You've got to tell me how a mother has a right to tell her husband not to touch the inside of his babies cheek, and how this affects her welfare or the babies welfare. The only possible way it could negatively affect the woman's welfare is if she is a whore. You're basically saying, she should have the right to get away with being a whore, and covering itnup by saying that it's for the babies welfare.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 11:57 PM
1

Being a successful businessman and the rewards and attitudes that come with it are attractive to women as a group overall, the same cannot be said for women who pursue these goals regarding whether those traits are attractive to men overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 11:52 PM
1

My partner can do whatever she wants, she is a big girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 11:48 PM
1

Who the fucks rights have been taken? Wtf!?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 11:45 PM
4

Violence is the ultimate means, to almost every end we have as a species. This is true for almost every other species too.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 11:43 PM
3

Prove it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 11:26 PM
2

My experience is consistent with this
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 11:24 PM
1

If you want to support everyone's rights you've gotta be cool with men doing what it takes to get an effective paternity test. The easiest and least invasive would be just taking the swab.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 11:20 PM
4

Being gay isnt a choice as a blunt statement is a strong and totally unsupportable position to take.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 11:19 PM
8

Being born a certain race is not a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 11:11 PM
1

How does a woman build value in the eyes of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 11:01 PM
1

I'm on a mobile and I'm distracted. For a man that feels the need to do a test, being honest about it is a crap tactic. Anyone who genuinely wanted to protect men's reproductive rights wouldn't tell a suspicious man ask permission to swab his own kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 10:49 PM
1

From the perspective of the well being of the baby why would this need any more extra parental permission than wiping food off its face, or cleaning it's teeth? It's clear that you oppose it because it takes an unnatural politically defended ability of dishonesty from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 10:30 PM
1

For the most part we are talking about a mouth swab. If you're arguing against that you probably hate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 10:12 PM
1

The idea that one parent needs to ask permission from the other parents to touch the child in a completely harmless manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 09:39 PM
2

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 10:47 AM
1

How is swabbing the kids mouth by a trusted parent got to do with its wellbeing ?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 05:18 AM
3

Why the hell should it? Suppose your partner cant hold the child either?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 01:31 AM
2

The only reason its not appropriate more often is because it isnt default, if it were default it would be a total non issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 01:28 AM
2

When you say secret you mean like, "I fucked Tom and its his kid." ?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 12:48 AM
3

A mouth swab needs the other parents permission?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 12:47 AM
1

Or women who are straight but attracted to men who are women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 12:37 PM
1

I added the, mentally normal and straight caveat bluntly a few messages ago which is my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 12:20 PM
1

you moved the fucking goalposts.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:55 AM
1

move the goalposts as far as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:37 AM
1

Your sarcasm isnt helping I could send you a page of google results showing studies, or you can google them yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:15 AM
1

There are no mentally sound women who are straight who prefer a man to have zero dominance and zero ambition.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 11:05 AM
1

Both of those attributes are sexy to women if they are in the right amount. With no ambition or dominance at all men are unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 10:46 AM
1

You think that i'm implying that the most dominant and ambitious man is the most attractive man. Im not. Get me now?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 10:05 AM
1

How is the things are are discussing subjective and relative immaterial to your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 09:42 AM
1

How is the things we are discussing being subjective and relative immaterial to your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 09:42 AM
1

how?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 09:10 AM
0

You dont know what subjective OR relative means do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 08:15 AM
2

The mother has to She doesnt have to do anything in most cases except that which she chooses. She has almost 100% freedom to make any choice she wants in most western nations. So no. She doesnt have to do shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 06:00 AM
1

Im trying to convince you that dominance and ambition are subjective, and relative.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/16 12:12 AM
0

You really really want to make sure no one changes your opinion on your own narrative, huh.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 11:14 PM
0

I knew well what was meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 11:13 PM
1

They are 99% effective, but that's not in a lifetime that's each time you use one. 200 uses a year divided by the fact that women can't get pregnant every day equals 20% pregnancy rates per year for an average couple using condoms. 22% for pull out, and 17% for the average contraceptive pill user.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 08:17 AM
1

Thats yes, I cant be bothered sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 12:53 AM
1

This is genuinely over your head?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 12:45 AM
1

You believe that the people in your life are totally honest with you. Thats naive. No ifs or buts.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 12:41 AM
1

whether you are familiar with daily adversaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 12:41 AM
1

You're presenting yourself as an authority on this topic. Thats a fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 12:33 AM
1

You wouldnt know, you're incredibly naive Id say.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 12:28 AM
1

You're quite naive. This is my opinion. If I were in your life you;d have no idea what I think, and you'd have no idea if I was manipulating you because you think everyone in your life is doing everything in their power to be honest with you and that they are not incentivized by their personal needs to play any power games.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/16 12:00 AM
1

And I'm a lawyer so.... Appeal to authority fallacy. Everyone is a potential adversary from the perspective of their wants and needs, and how those wants and needs incetivize them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 11:56 PM
1

Law 12 Use Selective Honesty and Generosity to Disarm your Victim One sincere and honest move will cover over dozens of dishonest ones. Open-hearted gestures of honesty and generosity bring down the guard of even the most suspicious people. Once your selective honesty opens a hole in their armor, you can deceive and manipulate them at will. A timely gift – a Trojan horse – will serve the same purpose. Law 3 Conceal your Intentions Talk endlessly about your wants and desires, just not about your …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 11:24 PM
1

I think you are naive if you genuinely believe that everyone is here to work for everyone else rather than to look out for their own interests. Your own children care about their own interests more than yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 11:20 PM
1

Maybe he is an excellent manipulator and you dont realise that you are coming to an agreement where both option one and option 2 are his preferences? Anyway the point is that you have no idea how he really feels and if he is good at the game of power you wouldnt know that he was good at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 10:38 PM
1

It quite literally is everyone VS me if I want to take responsibility for my own happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 10:13 PM
1

I never suggested that they actively participate on reddit. You yourself have said that they have behaviours that suggest they believe some theories about women and relationships, and who knows how deep those beliefs go? Only them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 10:13 PM
1

My argument is ... Finally, thankyou. For many, they believe that everyone is for themselves and that the world is me vs 'them'.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:41 PM
1

Im serious, no one here is taking you seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:40 PM
1

I think the men in my family, as well as the men I work with have no reason to hide their true feelings from me. Wait up, Is this your true and honest belief? That people with close relationships have absolutely no reason to be dishonest about how they feel or what they believe in any way?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:39 PM
3

You think they'd be honest with you if they felt that way? You think people who have non mainstream opinions on gender in their society just openly vilify themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:22 PM
1

You're currently acting like a kid going "nah nah nah nah nah lol no YOURE an idiot, not me! lahlahlahlahlah" Just stop, no one is taking you seriously, not even yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:20 PM
5

with typical use both pullout and condoms are right around 20% failure for a couple who have sex 3 times a week for a year, birth control pills are like 17%. Women go on and on about how men have control because there are so many kinds of birth control but pull out is damned close to as effective as her being on the pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:18 PM
0

Your argument is that you FEEL that is it harmful to YOU. Why should I care about your argument made with disingenuous words, about how you FEEL? If you want to be taken seriously say something like "it occurs to me that TRP might be harmful towards this one particular group of people in this particular way." Then you might get taken seriously. Until then you are just using feminist weasel words and hoping no one calls you out for your lack of argument. "XYZ is bad and harmful" is not an argumen…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:12 PM
1

my husband and all the men in my life think it's bullshit How could you possibly even know?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 09:06 PM
1

Harmful or destructive is NOT a common definition. Poisonous is. Harmful and destructive, especially in this instance is COMPLETELY your opinion, hence, it isnt a real argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 08:43 PM
3

People arent tuning out because its inflammatory, but because it isnt defined in a useful way. It just means that it causes things that you dont like. High levels of masculinity cause things that you dont like, but millions of others do like. Doesnt benefit you much in your opinion, does benefit millions of others in their opinion. Hence toxic means "I dont like it". nor is the common definition of the word The common definition of the word is: -Poisonous So even here you are wrong, or being dis…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 08:26 PM
4

Toxic doesn't mean anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 12:17 PM
8

toxic Webster dictionary: 1- "I don't like it." 2- "It benefits someone, but not me." Etc
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 08:55 AM
2

straya
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 08:43 AM
7

Let me give you a challenge, unload a revolver, completely unload it, yourself. Now play Russian roulette with it, you feel completely comfortable or... uneasy? Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 08:34 AM
3

Enjoy your cats.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 10:06 PM
2

Thank-you for one more useless post. People can now see how useless you are as a poster here and can continue to ignore you in the future. Don't bother replying i wont read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 10:05 PM
3

Only one of us knows for sure and its me, the ONLY thing you can go on is fee fees.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 09:26 PM
4

I'm not, and how would you even know? My ex chases me, I left one nice girl behind when I chose my partner, and my partner adores me, what else would a guy want?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 09:24 PM
3

I love myself and women and they seem to not.mind me too much overall. My gorgeous sweet partner certainly doesn't mind me. I think you're projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 09:20 PM
2

You didn't answer their questions. I'd bet you would wait for your favourite partner in your youth in hindsight
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 09:19 PM
2

If it took that long to see any kind of advancement in the relationship, I would probably move on I doubt that this is actually true. This is what both my current partner once said, and my previous partner said. It hasn't borne out in reality for me, and I'd bet that a guy worth keeping you would wait for, rather than move on and risk losing him. In fact I'd say that his withholding a ring makes him more attractive! If he was already across the line regarding being worth waiting for.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 09:17 PM
2

The real issue I have with your ideas is that you think that the education is the causation and i dont.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 08:32 PM
3

You addressed things he never claimed, and gave no explanation for your answer to the question he asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 11:39 AM
1

Humans arent loyal, debate that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 11:35 AM
1

No seriously, everyone here is going to skim, and read your post at face value, this is the internet, no one here is trying to do a deep analysis of your post unless they think you have something important to say, and they wont if none of your points are blunt. None of this 'read between the lines' stuff will help your cause. And you know dam well im not the only person in this thread saying this. Im done I wont even read your next post so dont bother sending it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 11:32 AM
1

The truth is that I skimmed it only, I dont have a care in the world to read into someones reply here and try and fish out an answer. This is probably true for everyone else here. I still havnt gone back and read it again, and I wont. If you intend for people to pay attention to your ideas you need to be blunt and direct them here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 11:26 AM
1

Im doing fine. Treat the sub like its sposed to be treated next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 11:05 AM
1

And yet here we are, not having a clue what youre on about. You probably think that proves you right, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 10:53 AM
1

Because I did, in a way most of the human race would recognize. its a debate not a chat in the pub among mates
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 10:31 AM
11

TRP answers this quite easily. Men need sex more. Women need commitment more.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 10:04 AM
1

You havnt asked a question that I havnt answered. EDIT: Just looked at your post history, all of your posts are you acting like this.. so... Im out. Enjoy your sarcasm and lack of literal questions and points.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 08:12 AM
1

Theyre a bunch of different people, a bunch of them say clever shit and a bunch say dumb shit, the message as a whole, I support. Honestly, what else do you want me to say?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 07:18 AM
1

Then I answered, they are free to say what they want I dont give a fuck, I support free speech. If that isnt a good enough answer, dont know what it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 06:55 AM
1

If you want an answer ask a clear question within the context of this comment thread. Thankyou.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 06:44 AM
1

I support free speech. Is that what you are asking?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 03:58 AM
2

Please cite.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 03:26 AM
2

Isnt it already more than 60/40?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 03:25 AM
1

These arent violence, these are angry people yelling and threatening to shove other angry people.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 03:08 AM
1

Read between the lines - Why dont you just actually answer holy fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 03:06 AM
1

I don't see the point of making her pay child support if the father is willing and able to take care of the child Surely the child would be better off if she did pay child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 02:42 AM
1

Youre talking as if men have access to reliable contraception and as if telling our women that we dont trust them and that we are leaving the rubber on wont cause issues for most guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/16 02:38 AM
2

Good for -you-.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 09:12 AM
1

No one except you even suggested this as a relevant concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 08:33 AM
1

Its not up to me, it has to make sense for women to be attracted to weaker men than the other options, why would women be attracted to weaker options? Answer me that and Ill understand your perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 08:30 AM
1

you miss the point I think, men dont care if women are 'comfortable' with their feelings, they care if expressing their feeling stops them from getting what they want out of life, and it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 08:09 AM
3

Its a stronger desire for women to want a strong man than the opposite. I think we can all agree with that statement
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 08:04 AM
1

I dont know what your personal strategy is, but there are a fuckload of women, 4 billion odd, and that huge group of people has some differences to the other 4 billion strong group of men. Your group seeks power, wealth, strength and protection, my male group seeks young, health, fertility and compassion. Your group has a lower sex drive and a higher burden of pregnancy, so for these reasons the strategies used are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 08:01 AM
1

It wasnt sarcastic. Explain.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 07:52 AM
1

Id love for you to explain how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 07:42 AM
2

There is absolutely no way women would want a weak man, like, WHY? Honestly this is so silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 03:42 AM
0

You HAVE to be joking? Why would women change this attitude? Whats in it for them? Its a good strategy to feel this way and act this way so what the hell would ever convince them to change? Wow, what a ridiculously childish perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 03:31 AM
8

Thats a fucking 5 start post man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 03:00 AM
2

Mao was personally capitalistic, and used his capitalistic power to force everyone else into a state where they were his slaves, they were forced to do what he wanted or die. He wouldnt have had his power in a free market libertarian state. You falsely assume that he made the communist state he ruled for the good of his people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 02:44 AM
1

Youre saying that YOUR life was pretty care free in the 90s. Sure. Overall we have way more and better shit for the same working hours. We are wealthier now than ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:57 AM
1

Thankyou.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 01:41 AM
1

Yeah because a female teacher being paid half a male teacher would in the past is because they were less valuable. What? I don't care about what "women as a whole" want, I care what I want and I want more. Are you missing the point on purpose?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 12:14 AM
1

No shit you do. Congratulations for being human.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 12:11 AM
1

Its definitely less valuable to women as a whole. Men dont pay women less, women are worth less, if they werent theyd get paid the same. Youre a moron for believing anything different.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/16 12:10 AM
1

They are the only ones that hate women for not being men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 11:06 PM
1

Its misogyny because they are the only people that hate that women cant stack up to men in male dominated traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 10:55 PM
6

I've got a relationship I'm.very happy with, I can walk away from it anytime and find another good woman who compliments me too. I don't hate women I just recognise that their strategies and goals are not the same as men and I enjoy understanding how and why their end of the relationship game works.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:28 PM
3

Did you miss the point accidentally or intentionally??
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:19 PM
3

They're both average and she is obnoxious.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:14 PM
1

Women won't do any of the huge groundbreaking things whilever men can impress women by doing them. Because they won't have to. This has always been, and probably always will be true. Only women seem to be mad that this causes men and women's achievements to be in different fields. That's the real mysoginy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:04 PM
1

There is absolutely.no way that women will ever dominate surgery, or military strategy or anything like it. Money is less valuable to women than men, and the status that come swoth the territory or jobs like that is also less valuable to women than men. We are different. The only people who seem to truly hate that women aren't identical to men is women. That's the real mysoginy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:02 PM
1

I absolutely never ever said or implied that we should.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:53 PM
1

I don't think violence has a place in our society Violence is THE means to all ends. If you believe in govt you believe in violence. Pretty hard to argue with someone who has such immature and unrealistic views.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:43 PM
1

Women have a higher eq. Men have a more competitive drive. Do the math.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:42 PM
1

That's your worldview. I can't so anything to debate your baseless worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:42 PM
1

Men and women as groups are not identical.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 08:41 PM
3

She absolutely doesnt have to do anything but take 2 months or less off. and if she is an olympian shell be a bit fat to compete for 9 months.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 11:37 AM
3

She doesnt have to have kids. Like ever, no one is forcing her.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 10:47 AM
2

Ive been there, never been hurt, and consider myself comfortably successful with women. Apparently Im not the only one, but you know what? They are randoms on the internet, I dont get hung up on it. If you do, id suggest you get better hobbies.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 10:08 AM
4

Umm? How? So the female lawyers, police officers, surgeons and architects, who scored higher than the average man in the same class, HAVE TO work less hours and be less successful careers people? It has nothing to do with their genders preferences?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 10:02 AM
2

Who even cares, bunch of whiny men who cant get laid and like 100 guys who go there to try and steer them right. Not my, or your, problem. But... and its a big but... you put those words in my mouth, so fuck off.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 10:00 AM
3

Thats why I dont get it, its sarcasm but I have no idea in what direction its aimed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:39 AM
1

You think because women can be misogynists that this excuses Red Pill? You didnt just put these words in my mouth?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:26 AM
1

Oh yeah women on average work the same hours and earn the same amount and buy the same amount of stuff and add the same amount of value to the economy. Sure ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:21 AM
2

I have no idea what youre saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:20 AM
2

You're putting tonnes of words in my mouth. Troll elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 09:19 AM
2

So basically you are saying women and their skills are worthless. Thats really the point my OP post makes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 07:29 AM
5

Humans receive criticism no matter what path they choose. If you want to be held to the same standards as men stop complaining about shit we have out up with forever. People criticise, be a bigger person and shut up and get back to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:56 AM
2

Women can create human life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:51 AM
5

Oh yeah, things like income, life expectancy, hours worked, houses built bought and sold, all that stuff is identical huh. Well thanks for the info.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 06:47 AM
1

None of it is deep, it's all just some arbitrary attribute that you prefer.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 04:17 AM
4

And yet they still choose careers that allow more time for feminine things like child rearing, flexibility to take time off to care for loved one etc. I think your reaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:49 AM
1

So you're vetting people in interests and the guy is vetting people on what turns him on. You have different priorities in a partner, doesn't make you deeper in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 02:48 AM
1

Lol OK. Go ahead and be lazy. I don't mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 12:35 AM
6

You're projecting. I don't feel that way at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 12:35 AM
1

Then I'll just work 50 still, have a tonne of Capitol and power over you and your lazy 30 bour mates. Sure go ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 12:29 AM
8

I have no idea where you get that from. It doesn't address what I've said at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 12:27 AM
7

I say leftists because right wingers tend to be ok with traditional gender roles, where as left wingers seem to want to force women into traditionally masculine gender roles. Seemed like a fair group of people to single out in this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:33 PM
8

What you just wrote isnt relevant to what I wrote at all, it seems like a completely different topic to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:31 PM
3

The thing thats a hard decision is, does she do feminine things, or is she willing to actually be one of the boys on a jobsite, because MOOOOST women dont actually want to be men, or be treated like men treat each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:25 PM
8

Id argue that the leftists in society are doing the exact thing you are arguing, but towards masculinity. Id add that women as a whole are more like women, and men as a whole are more like men, not that everyone is an individual and totally different.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:20 PM
6

Yeah, what I find interesting is how jealous leftist women are of men as a whole. Men are like: "Wow women have these attributes that arent traditionally masculine and I love those attributes, but its true that men are generally better at manly things, but I dont mind because I want my life partner to be a woman whos great at feminine things" Leftist women are all like: "I cant believe that men think we are worse than them at the only thing that matters, being a man. I can be just as manly as a …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:11 PM
1

25yo Male 25+ RP
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 10:44 PM
1

All I can say is that it sure isnt a checklist that can be determined in 30 seconds of talking at a bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 10:18 PM
9

How is it any less shallow? Intellect isnt 'deep'.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 12:23 PM
14

lol at how looks are shallow but eloquence, or wage or any other factor isnt.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 10:16 AM
3

I think that guys who make it into proper adulthood without having sex arent the guys the women in that thread were imagining, I think they are imagining a regular totally cool sociable guy who just so happens to have not got his dick wet in 25 years, but that guy doesnt really exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/16 07:18 AM
1

So youre saying that the avergage family in the 60s could easily afford unlimited knowledge and entertainment in their pocket? 50" TVs? 300hp cars with ABS, double clutch gearboxes, side curtain airbags and reverse cameras? Air con in every room? 2 cars? Unlimited phone calls cross country? Unlimited letters to anyone in the world? Normal every day families have all that and more, and youre saying that stuff was all the rage and totally affordable in the 60s?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/16 06:23 AM
1

What are people going without? Like, they have to turn off the heater and put a jumper on? Oh, the horror.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 12:05 PM
1

By what? The average person here lives an awesome exceptionally privileged life
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 10:51 AM
1

They dont go without shit, they could eat potato soup like my grandparents did with their 6 kids but they are above it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 10:36 AM
1

Youre from australia? sweet, so am I. Its patently obvious that the vast majority of people finance themselves up the wazoo to keep up with the jones' and I have little to no sympathy or empathy for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 09:53 AM
1

Inflation is absolutely completely irrelevant, the only thing that matters is how much stuff and of what quality/features it has per hour worked for the average person. And thats better/higher/more now than it ever has been in history. You cant escape that we get more for less now than ever before. Thats real wealth. By definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 09:09 AM
1

I'm far from rich in my community, lower middle class Australia, but I'm rich beyond the dreams of Kings past. Here is the definition of wealth straight from Wikipedia. ealth is the abundance of valuable resources or valuable material possessions. This includes the core meaning as held in the originating old English word weal, which is from an Indo-European word stem.[1] An individual, community, region or country that possesses an abundance of such possessions or resources to the benefit of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 07:46 AM
4

Why not both?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 07:18 AM
1

You're objectively wrong about that not being wealth. And yeah everyone can do that if they live within their means and work.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 07:17 AM
7

I think a culture of encouraging taking responsibility for personal safety is a step forward, not backward.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 06:41 AM
1

I can eat any cuisine I want with little to no regard to its cost, I can travel to any corner of the world in a day and live through many diseases and injuries, I can have all of this while having almost no risk to my personal safety. I live in exceptionally safe comfortable air conditioned buildings which will be affected by no flood, plague or war. I have unlimited free entertainment and access to the entire wealth of human knowledge in my pocket. I'm exceptionally wealthy in many metrics that…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 06:36 AM
9

Considering that we have a culture that encourages women to take little responsibility for their safety I'd say that overall changing that culture would do society some good.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 06:34 AM
10

So why is encouraging people we care about to protect their belongings OK, but encouraging them to protect themselves not OK?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 06:18 AM
6

Right but you do lock it, and you'd encourage your friends tondo the same, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 06:10 AM
6

You know the risks of not locking the door so you lock it, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 06:06 AM
5

Do you lock your home when you leave?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 06:02 AM
7

Do you lock you car at night?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 06:01 AM
1

Ok let me break it down to one easy question. Is a brand new 70" TV better than a 10" 60s TV, both of which can/could be afforded by equivalent people in both eras. If the 70" TV is just as affordable then we are wealthier. If the 70" TV(and it's content) is shitloads better, then we are shitloads wealthier. It really is that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 05:52 AM
1

Wealth is having things. We get more things by being more productive. If we are more productive we have more things and are wealthier. It doesn't matter if the dollars in our account are the same or even less adjusted for inflation if an hour's oay gets us more or better things. Which it does now compared to the past. We are wealthier nowbthan we ever have been.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 01:39 AM
1

That's not how this works
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 12:27 AM
1

so if we have more wealth overall, how are we less wealthy?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 11:22 PM
1

How can you possibly think that having more people working is going to lower productivity?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 11:03 PM
1

Is it THIS thread again? Entitlement galore.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:41 PM
1

Again, I stand by everything I said above.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:38 PM
1

So youre sour that you cannot afford retirement because you are too poor to have it and all the BS your credit card can handle, but you wont give up all that BS?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:38 PM
1

Well stop buying that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 02:12 PM
1

Everyone. You are far to dense to argue with, im over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 04:32 AM
1

That because people as a whole want way more shit than before and work a shitload harder for it. If everyone gets richer except me am I getting poorer?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 04:32 AM
1

Your using middle class home as a metric on purpose to decieve. How about you tell us about the features of their home, their luxury items and their car. Edit: I mean, do you really want to drive a 70s VW, watch 70s tv on a 70s tv, have no internet, no mobile, etc? Come on its so dishonest to suggest that the life quality was better then
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 04:22 AM
1

Of course you and I are wealthier, could your parents walk outside and buy a car with 300hp, air con, power steer, 5 star safety, ABS, TC, front and side curtain airbags, automatic gearbox, auto wipers, auto lights, 6 speaker premium sound, etc etc etc? Of course not, because they were way poorer than most people now.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 03:00 AM
1

"You don't seem to understand basic things. When the middle class had simple cook books, its because they weren't being brought the cheapest produce and products from all over the world and sold though the likes of walmart" So people have better access access to products and services than in the past.. in other words because of places like walmart the average person is wealthier. Thanks for giving my argument a great example.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 02:48 AM
0

No it means he is wealthier, which is the only important thing here. Wealth is access to good and services, for your info.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 02:46 AM
1

Of course Im wealthier, could your parents walk outside and buy a car with 300hp, air con, power steer, 5 star safety, ABS, TC, front and side curtain airbags, automatic gearbox, auto wipers, auto lights, 6 speaker premium sound, etc etc etc? Of course not, because they were way poorer than most people now.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 02:29 AM
1

You are suggesting that a 1970 ford, the entertainment on a 1970 tv in 1970, and a landline is just as luxurious as what we have now? Youre being intentionally intellectually dishonest. Stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 11:06 PM
14

Women fucking hate each other and they especially dislike female authority figures.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 11:04 PM
1

Equivalent to a 2016 Camry and broadband in their pocket?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 11:02 PM
1

Im agreeing with you bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 10:50 PM
1

What does 'wages have stagnated' even mean? We can buy far more for the average persons 1 hour of work than ever before. We are clearly far wealthier as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 10:47 PM
1

Fucking A
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 10:26 PM
1

They would certainly have a 1950s middle class lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 10:25 PM
1

It disputes the myth that middle class families with two incomes are struggling because they squander their money on luxuries. No it doesnt, my argument is that what we consider as normal now were luxuries in the 70s, and that if we want to live without what we consider normal now, then we could easily afford the other things they had in the 70s. For example, your study talks about house and car payments. Are those average car payments for a 1970 VW in good nick? Cos if they arent, and they are …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 10:16 PM
1

That doesnt dispute what I have said.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 10:05 PM
2

Im saying that many people have lived their whole lives with luxuries that the people of the 70s didnt dream of, and to suggest that in order to afford a house in a safe suburb on one income while supporting a wife and children you might have to give up some of those luxuries is just catastrophically offensive to some, showing their entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 09:41 PM
2

This really is a big part of my point. The average person lives a way better life than someone in the 70s. If you want to raise a family on one income like they did in the 70s you EASILY can if you are willing to forfeit the luxuries most these days feel entitled to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 09:21 PM
1

Overall, the average person lives a far better life that people in the 70s, -despite- the issues you correctly point out.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 09:19 PM
2

Dude, several of those things weren't invented yet. Exactly. Rented from blockbuster does NOT equal having unlimited entertainment for fucking free on broadband. The average person didnt have anything like the climate control we enjoy now, and the quality of affordable exotic food we now have in insane. Go read some 70s cookbooks if you want examples of how simple they lived. We have all this and more. If we want to live like our parents did on a single income, we EASILY can.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 09:18 PM
2

How can you possibly believe that, the luxuries that the modern person has is just unbelievable for a person of the 70s.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 09:11 PM
2

Bruh, if you want to buy a single bedroom shack and a 1970 volkswagen, you too can do it if you omit your cellphone plan, broadband, netflix account, air conditioning, takeout meals and all of the other luxuries your parents went without.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 09:03 PM
3

Its literal fact, not opinion. What we can afford has just grown slower than our entitlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 09:00 PM
5

We can easily afford the exact same stuff now. Its a repeated myth when people suggest otherwise. If you want to buy a single bedroom shack and a 1970 volkswagen, you too can do it if you omit your cellphone plan, broadband, netflix account, air conditioning, takeout meals and all of the other luxuries your parents went without.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 09:00 PM
3

Im going to blow your whole argument out of the water by pointing out that the current generation of young men and women have it so fucking much easier and are so much wealthier than any generation before has even dreamed of, and we can absolutely afford to buy the same luxuries and property our parents could. Your whole premise is wrong in that respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 08:28 PM
2

Your advice is like "if you trust them it'll be sweet". OK, great advise..
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 02:06 AM
2

Consent to sex is consent to pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 11:01 PM
2

"Consent to sex is consent to pregnancy" What a shit argument. Now you know how we feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 11:00 PM
2

Suggesting that trusting someone somehow insures you from being fucked over.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 11:00 PM
0

We are suggesting that the woman has a complete 100% choice, how can you be so blind as to not understand this?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 11:25 AM
1

I completely agree on all points.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 11:24 AM
1

I'm really disappointed in you. This is some of the angriest and least intelligent posting I've seen you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 08:25 PM
8

Did you happen to read my examples of how nicely women were treated socially compared to men? It has tonnes of genuine examples of the difference in how society as a whole treats women and what it lets them get away with that men simply cant.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 01:53 PM
2

Men whose whole life is about their career Thats true but those who succeed in making their whole life their career are the most respected and desired. Not so for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 01:40 PM
9

Show me all the women killing themselves and we might be able to have a real talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 01:28 PM
3

You arent arguing against ANYTHING that I just said.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 12:27 PM
17

Men and women both have advantages and disadvantages compared to each other, women however have the majority of advantages that make life as a whole easier for the average of each gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 05:04 AM
1

Never even close to implied that you were.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 05:03 AM
1

It's not that important in social dynamics, very high priority in flirting. I totally disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/16 12:03 AM
2

You just genuinely feel that if you click the average facebook update for a man and for a woman the man is receiving the same amount of attention from women as the average woman is from men? Im sure this is easily proveable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:51 PM
3

I answered your question. Someone else came along and said 'im the kind of person hes talking about and for me he's right'. What more could you possibly want from me?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:48 PM
1

Women get more attention BECAUSE of sex, whether they are advertising sex or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:31 PM
0

Good for -YOU-.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:30 PM
3

Im literally just answering the question you posed, and if you look, another BP flair lady agreed with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:29 PM
2

You genuinely believe that men and women, all else equal, get equal amounts of positive attention on social media from the opposite gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:25 PM
3

I think that women as a whole are going to be happier taking a more passive role while men are going to be happier fulfilling a more active role despite it being more difficult on paper. All of the happiness studies show a trend away from female happiness as they have become more career oriented.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:24 PM
8

It seems a bit harsh to blame women for men murdering other men! But I'm sure you came to the subject with an open mind! No one said they do. But the female victim complex knows no bounds.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:18 PM
32

You can easily compare how men and women get treated by society as a whole when doing the same things. Compare men hitting women to women hitting men. Compare men complaining about the above. Compare women hitting men vs men hitting men. Compare how rude a woman can be to a man without being called out. Compare a mans reaction to getting spit on by a woman vs getting spit on by a man. Compare how the courts treat women. Compare how the police treat women. Compare how women get treated favourably…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 11:03 PM
4

If it makes them bitter and unhappy with life, absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 10:54 PM
3

Id really like to see what MorphineOralSolution has to say about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/16 10:54 PM
1

Yeah because those strategies make more sense when you havnt got your own financial backing. That'll surprise no one, however the strategies are all the same regardless of race, culture or class.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/16 02:48 AM
1

Every job is another opportunity. People wouldnt be working the jobs they are in if they believed they had a better option. More options can only possibly be better.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/16 02:44 AM
1

Suicide rate of post op is staggering. Its like 40% or some shit, google it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 11:29 PM
1

SSRIs are an AWESOME idea. take some more pls.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 11:21 PM
2

It has nothing to do with corporations doing everything in their power to fuck over the economy for all but the wealthiest. All those jobs they shipped overseas to places with no concept of a quality of life? How little empathy you have for the people in 2nd and 3rd world countries who now have a huge amount more work opportunity is disgusting and incredibly selfish. The irony that a leftist feels this way doesnt escape me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 11:20 PM
1

Yeah, this is the implied point.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 08:47 AM
1

We have by far the best standards of living ever. Compared to ever..
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/16 01:48 AM
1

You gotta be all about dat money to have a reasonable standard of living. What you say here is at odds with many posts here, and I also totally disagree with you. We have by far the best standards of living ever, by just such a huge margin its mind boggling.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 09:31 PM
2

Negging is how flirting works.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/16 12:13 AM
2

I didnt say ANYTHING like that, thankyou.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 01:09 PM
4

The only reason older guys get with younger is girls is because women his age can't stand him. So you think 35 year old dudes prefer to fuck 35 year olds rather than college girls? You're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 11:34 AM
2

Got a citation to go with that opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/16 11:33 AM
0

People rationalise all sorts of dumb decisions based on lack of self awareness. From.bad diets, bad relationships, bad jobs. Things that they don't change because they have rationalised it internally.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 10:18 PM
1

He never said anything at all that even implies that he thinks even half of women are like.this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 10:17 PM
-1

People are already self aware Lol k
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 09:37 PM
1

It has nothing tondonwith me so I just don't care. You have nonidea why that clone would be happier it could be anything, pure luck, totally unrelated to you at all and it just isn't your problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 09:34 PM
2

I couldn't possibly agree more.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 09:30 PM
3

Its useful to me if Im a self loathing bottom of the barrel loser, who is googling how to get better with women because my level of self respect is far lower than the correct amount for attracting women. Now, Ive never been that, Ive always had quite a bit of success, but leaving a 6 year relationship and feeling like I was starting a fresh, a quick kick in the arse about how I was worth easily as much as the average hot chick in a bar helped me a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 02:48 AM
2

It does feel like you agree with some of the ideas based on your longest post to me, above. I think we are, for the most part, on the same page. many other men will tell you similar things.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 02:09 AM
2

Therefore, you should be more tolerant of other people's bad behavior, because you are the same as them, not better than them. No, I intend to improve my life, your advice is counter productive. You are also probably less nervous, because you care less. Women, and people in general, cannot read your internal state. They only judge you by your outward behavior. Absolutely. If you actually externalized your beliefs and said, "I think you are less worthy of respect than myself", do you really think…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 01:54 AM
1

No, my point is that it helps some men. Ive given examples of men which it has helped. You havnt refuted those examples you just insulted the people.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 01:51 AM
1

Your original premise is objectively wrong yes, I'm glad we can agree on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 01:17 AM
1

I said it helped some men, you ask if they are even qualified to answer. They are men. So yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 12:46 AM
6

There are ups and downs to all levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 12:33 AM
1

You're intentionally skirting my question and point. I've had enough of you, you don't want to discuss this only attack people who you believe are below you. Either address the statements made or leave please.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 12:24 AM
5

Testosterone is directly related to aggression.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 12:22 AM
1

I'm not going to agree or disagree with your more specific points but I will say that nothing you said disagrees with anything I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/16 12:07 AM
7

Testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 11:54 PM
1

I said quite clearly that AWALT contributes for many men. You come back by asking if those men are qualified to tell us if it helps them. Is this a serious reply that you expect me to answer or are you conceding that you are wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 11:43 PM
9

Had your test checked?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 11:40 PM
2

So I think youd agree that people with low self esteem tend to respect themselves a lower amount than others. And I think youd tend to agree that this is because they compare themselves to others and feel that they are unworthy. Again I think youll tend to agree that people in general compare themselves to others. When you see the shitty properties that every human has, its easier for the respect me vs respect others balance to even out a bit, and that helps if you start with a less than ideal a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 11:35 PM
3

It helps people to respect themselves more.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 10:43 PM
6

No its not, tonnes of dudes who use it, and say that it helps them. How else could you possibly quantify that?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 10:43 PM
7

Some of the practice pick up stuff is excellent, eye contact, how being aloof works, body language cues both reading them and giving the right ones off. Lots of TRP and pillsphere stuff reminds you of all of the negatives women have which help to depedastalise them. It also does this for men, humans in general, reminding me that human nature is very dishonest and scheming and teaching me why to respect myself way more and other less, and giving me ideas about how to test if this is true. Leading…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 10:34 PM
7

2 questions, does it matter why? And, why do you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 10:04 PM
2

ok
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 08:26 PM
9

Woah! So a sphere which tells people how to practice and what cues to look for in a skill, is totally unbelieveable that it might change peoples skill?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 08:16 PM
9

The 'AWALT crap' contributes to self improvement for many men, specifically those at the bottom of the food chain. Now what?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 08:10 PM
2

Basically, you disagree with some right wing ideas. Ok, I concede that you disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 08:10 PM
2

Until there is a better model, its the truest thing available.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 07:52 PM
13

Its helped polish my game, last year was the best year Ive ever had with women, way better than most guys have it and in that year I found my current partner and helped me understand her a lot better and our relationship is much better for it. And Im a better person myself. Awesome, why would you hate on that?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 07:42 PM
11

Yeah but its true enough that it works. Do you have an argument against what Im saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 07:40 PM
5

I cannot agree more with this comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 07:37 PM
2

But can you explain why the redpill refuses to admit to any positive pro-social instincts that can be found in human mating strategy? It simply doesnt. It just that most people find it easiest to attract most women using different tactics. Oh, and of course, the demand that we all return to traditional gender roles, because far right politics are an important part of sexual strategy. Now you're being sarcastic and I can only assume intentionally missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/16 11:00 AM
3

In an ingrained social tactic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/16 06:46 AM
1

it is pretty normal. a hell of a lot of people swing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 09:12 PM
1

17 w 24yo Edited.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 12:32 PM
2

what?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 06:02 AM
1

Well they mostly ask me to meet them alone without him knowing if they are happy that I performed well.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 05:34 AM
1

It's by far the easiest to fuck an actual.wife by just hitting a swingers site with good photos.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/16 02:08 AM
3

What Im saying is that I dont believe that to be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 10:48 PM
1

Swinger community. Join some websites.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 10:47 PM
3

Im saying that I was there, fucking the wife, and this is my interpretation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 09:00 AM
1

I couldnt possibly disagree with what OP suggests, by and large.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 08:45 AM
3

They dont know a lot better. These are dudes who seem to have lived a whole life as Bux.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 08:43 AM
7

That has been my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 08:37 AM
1

What an amazing victim complex. No one here said there is nothing you can do, but just that when you are an outlier you will be treated like one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 08:11 AM
7

It is a fetish where the guy gets his kicks when other guys fuck his wife. I dont really believe this. Ive fucked dudes wives in front of them, and the dude has not been in control of the situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 07:55 AM
1

Yeah, if you are a statistical outlier people will have misconceptions, not much you can do about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 07:45 AM
13

As someone who has been in the swinging community, I reckon I have a decent handle on this. In every case Ive experienced the woman is well in control, and the guys are losers. This experience is the best sexual experience they will get and they do what they are told. AMA.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/16 07:24 AM
1

Actually, I just read the study, the actual one not the linked article. The students were asked to pick the highest scorers in their class. Neither sex did this accurately, men chose men, women chose both women and men, there was no gender that picked the actual individuals accurately. Men tended to guess men at a higher rate than women did. Men infact are typically the highest scorers, if you didnt know each person scores you'd be most accurate if you guessed a random man, than a random woman. …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 10:31 PM
2

I didn't read it all but it sounds like they asked the students to point out people they thought scored the highest. This is almost always guys
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 12:08 AM
7

Unconditionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 10:35 PM
2

His answer was "yes".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 10:27 PM
3

The study is a little biased, assuming the men in those tests scored like men do in most tests, with a flat Bell curve. While the average score might only be 0.2% higher I'd bet my left testicle that almost all of the very highest were male scores. And the study asked people to pick the highest scorers. If this is true, and again I'm almost certain it would be then the study is intentionally intellectually dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 08:42 PM
5

Blame biology? It's not biology, if it were up to biology the dude would walk away at conception. What a crock of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 01:04 AM
2

Thats what he is saying, and he isn't passing personal judgement he is explain hownsoxiery reacts to both examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/16 10:04 PM
10

Any chick will split the bill is she respects you enough and believes you are worth it.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/16 10:13 AM
1

It's hardly a vague background level, everyone knows what will happen if you don't do what they say which is why they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 10:15 PM
0

Not even close. People would do what they wanted if armed men didn't enforce it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 09:56 PM
0

While is obvious to you and I, its very confronting to most. As has been said in this thread, putting it this bluntly is likely to make many just dismiss the argument as extreme and unrealistic. Basically, people don't intuitively realise that they are asking for groups of armed men to threaten people when they ask for any legal move.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 09:03 PM
1

That's my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/16 07:13 PM
1

Sounds pretty fucking indoctrinated to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 11:24 AM
1

From personal experience its easy if you are willing to walk away from the ones that get protective.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 09:16 AM
7

We incentivised women to break families apart with welfare and the family court system. We can see clearly the effects in sigle parent families and fatherless child studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 06:54 AM
3

Broken families. Boys without dad's. It's 80% of societies problems from violent crime to drug and alcohol.abuse to rape, murder and more.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 06:52 AM
1

Its helpful for those who have a complete disconnect between what they demand from society and what people have to do to other people in order to give them those demands.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 06:06 AM
0

Its exceptionally unlikely that if you hold a very specific political view, and it JUST SO HAPPENS to be the dominant view and educational system in your country and culture that you decided it was the best system as an original thouyght, and without indoctrination. Lets be real for a minute.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 06:05 AM
0

They have the exact same issues that other countries have with young women being second to men in job interviews, compounded by this additional factor. And fuck me, you dont speak for entire countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 06:04 AM
0

Most people are disconnected with the reality of what they are asking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 01:00 AM
1

You're missing the point, presumably intentionally. If your right is the right to own property, threatening people is probably acceptable, if your right is free "Insert service here", then its probably not ok. "respectful treatment is a right" is petty as fuck. Considering that 'rights' are made up ideas, they can be good ideas, or dumb as fuck and petty. When someone asks for something to be a 'right' I feel that its important they understand that they are asking for violent force against stran…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 12:47 AM
1

So what is it then.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 12:44 AM
1

Does your country not have execution for some crimes? We are way past the point here, the point is just that people usually dont realise what they are asking for when they demand something be a right.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 12:38 AM
1

We do now, and ALWAYS will live ina world controlled by the rich and powerful. How do you propose to change that? Its true no matter the era or region.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 12:32 AM
1

This is an issue of cause and effect. You believe that we have a big mafia style system and that stops corporate or guerrilla power, and I think it works both ways. Additionally "Your wrong, motherfucker now do what I believe is best" points gun at you Is exactly how the legal/govt system works.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 12:24 AM
1

See but you somehow dont see that that is the reality of our system right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/16 12:23 AM
1

It is let me prove it to you. "Your wrong, motherfucker now do what I believe is best" points gun at you
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 11:56 PM
1

There is no other way, the thread is challenging people to consider what they are demanding when they assert that "X petty thing" is a right
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 11:50 PM
1

Every right you have exists because men with guns threaten others. What a disconnect we have if most dont realise this.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 11:49 PM
1

Thats your indoctrination, the opposite is some other peoples.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 11:48 PM
1

The difference between you and most libertarians is that you genuinely believe that the system we now have is 'supposed' to help, like, its job is to help. Its a huge corporation, whos job is it to help? Libertarians believe that it would be better if actions were voluntary instead of forced. If I were personally paying the guys with guns Id be much more connected with what 'rights' I was asking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 11:47 PM
1

You hate him and want to disrespect him without knowing anything about him, Havnt even met the guy. How dumb is that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:48 PM
1

Completely agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:46 PM
1

There is a discussion in this subreddit, "should respect be a right?". I'm challenging people to consider what it is that they are asking for when they demand something is or should be a right.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:38 PM
1

Those means will be violence ultimately.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:08 PM
1

"Anything the govt has ever given you was first taken by force from someone else who earned it."
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 03:02 PM
3

Well, society is happy to grant some rights, most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 02:48 PM
1

The point is that rights can only exist when people are willing to promise to do violence. And then you need to ask yourself: "Am I really ok with paying a standover man so people cant think differently to me?"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 02:36 PM
3

But your cool with paying people to threaten people with death. So am I, but Im not willing to do it over say, respect, or internet use, or price fixing wages.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 02:34 PM
1

Are you drunk?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 02:26 PM
1

Not sure rampage killers are helping I suspect that they get more men on the womens side.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 02:25 PM
1

I completely agree. Your point here is my OP point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 02:19 PM
2

Im not sure that that is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 02:15 PM
1

Not sure what youre saying, honestly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 02:08 PM
3

Exactly, rights dont exist, rights are just guns. So the question is, do the left have ANY idea what they are asking for when they demand rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 02:06 PM
2

This is, infact, my point. When someone says "internet use is a basic human right" They are saying, "people should threaten those who have internet with death if they dont give me some".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 02:04 PM
1

Well, its up to men also to decide what rights women should have, by being prepared to do violence for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 02:01 PM
1

admitting that your female SO hits you is "beta". I mean, it isnt alpha..
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 01:57 PM
2

Those people are giving themselves their own rights, by being prepared to do violence on behalf of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 01:54 PM
7

And so the question becomes, when people demand petty things as 'rights', like respect, do they realise what they are doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 01:40 PM
3

You still havnt explained what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 01:12 PM
4

I can only you assume you mean that you feel that its ok to point guns at people in order to enforce any right you want, then you have to defend this idea for everything which you demand is a right, like the 'respect' thread. Youre saying, "if someone doesnt respect me im ok with gun bearing men telling them that they have to play nice".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 01:11 PM
5

What does objective quality mean in this context? Quality has many context based meanings.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 01:06 PM
2

objective quality?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 12:55 PM
4

What things in your life do you feel are ok with pointing guns at people for.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 12:54 PM
1

Because theres no way a legitimate legal system based attack would work for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 12:54 PM
1

Talking directly to me? (im OP)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 12:10 PM
4

The only way to enforce a right is promising violence. No?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 12:05 PM
4

The only way to enforce a right is promising violence. No?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 12:05 PM
3

Have you ever tried to define a right in your own words? Type it out, lets see.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 11:36 AM
3

If it were biology the dude would walk away directly after conception.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 11:34 AM
5

"If we lived in a society with better mandatory parental leave" You realize that this makes women worse off in the workforce right? Like, this actively discriminated against women who dont get pregnant and makes it harder for anyone with a vagina <40 to get work.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 11:14 AM
3

tl;dr the MRM is not proactive, pro-man group, it is a reactive, anti-feminist group Im totally ok with this, and Im sure many agree with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/16 11:02 AM
2

Exactly my point everyone, this guy also totally discludes fat people, who are something like 50% of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 10:36 PM
3

Let me repeat myself for those who didnt read it the first time. "I know people will say that all women can get dick whenever they want, which is TRUER for women than it is for men" Do you think that this woman: https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/12314033_10207895847135580_2190456190827444827_n.jpg?oh=e11b693a6eafc266464e0239652f9fa1&oe=5765B216 Has the same access to dick as this woman: https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xlp1/v/t1.0-9/12310688_10203405836665826…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 10:35 PM
2

Dumbest comment ever. Teach people abuse is bad? Idiot
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 07:12 AM
2

I got a paragraph in and thought, "but how hot are you?"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 11:54 AM
1

My Mrs is hot as fuck, AND a sweetheart.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 05:05 AM
1

Ok, no empathy. I cant change that and no amount of showing you other peoples problems will help so lets stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 11:57 PM
1

So far its their entire life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 11:50 PM
1

20 years is their lifetime, if they are 20. People who can get sex just dont get it. clearly. I could fuck 5 women this week, but I still have empathy for those who cant.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 11:42 PM
0

A year is NOT a lifetime.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 11:25 PM
2

"(whether or not that is justified because biology is often discussed, I won't discuss that now)" I will, If you want to use the biological argument, the guy can just walk the fuck away. Its not biology but the state granting women extra rights to use against men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 11:24 PM
1

WOW! Your sexism is CRAZY. "But by giving the father the option to walk away, you lay all the consequences of that responsibility on the mother" By giving the man the same choices as the woman, now the woman has responsibilities too, and SOMEHOW thats unfair on her? How brainwashed are you!?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 11:23 PM
2

Says someone who gets to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 11:14 PM
3

Women will literally say "You're right but I dont care, its wrong anyway". WTF does that even mean if it doesnt mean "Ill let my emotions control me even if I know its wrong".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 11:09 PM
6

Women and men are different and judged for different things. A man chooses to be a stay at home dad- "what a beta" A man goes outside with an hour of hair and makeup- "what a poof" A guy cant get laid if his life depends on it "what a loser". your points are invalid because the criticism goes both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 11:06 PM
5

Men pay the vast vast majority of the tax, women use the vast vast majority of the services.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 07:41 AM
4

It's all rolled into one.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 05:24 AM
5

You're wrong but female affection and sex are such an integral need forn a young man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 05:15 AM
6

Well you cant possibly understand it from the perspective of "My sex drive feels like this, yours couldnt possibly be so strong that it hurts." Because you just dont have enough testosterone to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 05:05 AM
1

If men could fuck a woman in a cardboard box he wouldnt buy a house. Heres Dave Chappele telling it better. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2I0JlwBaBs
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 05:02 AM
6

I mean sure, she could go to her local gym and ask some dudes for a course of Test Prop, then she would understand. But until then, its silly to suggest she has any idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 04:59 AM
7

Well obviously. Women are a net burden on the socialist system we live in, and men are net benefactors. By a huge margin I might add.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 04:58 AM
1

The cost to live the SAME STANDARDS your parents did have gone down. Its absolutely laughable to believe that your parents had it easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 04:56 AM
10

If you;re a chick, you dont have a dog in this race. You havent and will never experience what a mans sex drive can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 04:55 AM
20

Super easy to say that when you are getting some. Its like money, and Ill quote Kanye: Havin money's not everything, not havin it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 04:13 AM
8

10 times more secure than their grandparents were.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 04:11 AM
9

Men pay the vast, vast majority of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 04:03 AM
1

You can have the same mediovre life your parents had if you work for it. The entire planet is much much wealthier as a whole its laughable that people think they are worse off.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 04:02 AM
1

'Work hard' has no set meaning, either does 'succeed'. If you want the standard of living your parents had by doing the same amount of work you can very easily achieve it, but you dont want a 2 bedroom fibro shack in the hills and a 1980 ford, you want better shit. turns out better shit takes more work to buy!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/16 02:02 AM
2

Modern political systems arent capitalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 08:37 PM
5

Dayy govt is men paid for by other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 08:28 PM
1

what's with BP writing their opinion then saying "fact" after it. 3 times this week I've seen it now.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 08:15 PM
1

Go away you troll.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/16 07:57 AM
1

Those people don't live in a laisez faire system
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 11:20 PM
1

The bigger person. This is true for half of every pair if people. Regardless of gender. If you are a dude interacting with another dude, 50:50 you are the vulnerable one. I can't believe that you think only women are ever vulnerable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 11:19 PM
1

What does 'need' even mean in this context? Women cost taxpayers a tonne more money and men pay the vast majority of tax.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 09:33 AM
2

Im not american. Im from australia, a highly socialised country. If you are female, you almost certainly will be a net beneficiary.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 09:14 AM
1

Anyone left in a room alone with a more powerful person is in a shitty situation. This has nothing to do with gender, race, creed. Anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 06:23 AM
1

Mores better
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 04:37 AM
1

I cant vote either way, no idea why. Only on mobile can I vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 02:59 AM
2

Men of all creeds, wealth, race, fitness, facial attractiuveness etc, should ALL just strive to be the best they can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 02:51 AM
2

Its not about whether huge strength is required, but more is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 02:38 AM
1

Fuck you, you useless scum. You know damned well what 'getting fucked' means in this context you useless retard. Go die in a hole.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 02:30 AM
1

In addition to my other reply to this comment, the paramedics are only saving lives while they are being paid, they are only helping others when they are clocked on. because they are SELLING A SERVICE.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 02:29 AM
1

Paying taxes is literally: Pay us a portion of the fruits of your labour or you will be forced into a cell by a group of armed men. Thats literally what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 02:16 AM
1

You're still sounding exactly like the other legal students I've spoken to. There is really no point arguing against your ideals which don't match reality. The reality is that the total moral outcomes are all that matters in any system of rules. So again, stop conflating morality and legallity.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 02:05 AM
1

The need to take my money is your opinion. I don't want to take the fruits of your labour.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 02:04 AM
1

Yeah basically. I can't really justify using violence to take peoples money as a social policy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:59 AM
1

This one thing is AN advantage. Of course men are heavily favoured as a whole, they have always produced much more than women. Lately women have it even harder due to maternity laws and educational quotas.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:58 AM
1

Women are also as a whole judged to be more likeable. It's an advantage. Just admit it, there are disadvantages AND advantages in being born female.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:49 AM
1

I'm a libertarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:43 AM
2

I'm a libertarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:43 AM
1

I'm saying that it's an advantage you have. Just like strength is a male advantage. How can you not understand this?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:42 AM
1

I'm saying that in a user pays system, Ie paying for the results of your own risks, little would change in this respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:41 AM
1

You have conflated legallity with morality. The kind of thing that young teenagers do. Also have the attitude of many legal students. You're attitude will change a year or 2 into real world legal experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:25 AM
1

They aren't saving the lives of starving African kids. They are saving the lives that someone pays them to save. Someone literally goes" I have funds to save some lives, I want the people of this zipcode saved". And then they call some paramedics and say "if I give you 20 bucks an hour and an ambulance will you go around and save peoples lives in this zipcode?". And then the paramedics weigh up the pay vs the work and agree or disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:20 AM
1

You Havnt answered any question. What are you doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:20 AM
1

Being more likeable than the average man, and being hired based on beauty is AN advantage. When you sell yourself to an employer, why do you think the other half of the transaction ISNT them buying you? What's to stop an employer buying what they want, and why shouldn't a person be able to use their money to buy what they want?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:19 AM
1

That's not an argument. That's literally just an insult. You're not convincing anyone. Why would you intentionally raise the bar for skills and make it even harder for the most disadvantaged people to get their foot in the door?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:11 AM
1

I'm saying that the paramedics are currently choosing to save only the people who's lives are paid for. They don't help save lives who aren't paid for. That wouldn't change in a user pays system.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/16 12:10 AM
1

It's already up to them. If they as individuals weren't being paid enough they wouldn't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:59 PM
2

Well, effectively yeah. What do you think happens when you don't give them the money they demand?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:58 PM
2

The "good enough reason" would have to convince the paramedics, and the companies which supply the paramedics. It would be up to them to decide the reason. Right now they have decided that when the pay is high enough they trade their products and services. Can't see why it would be different in a user pays system.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:50 PM
0

I'd just get govt out of people relationships. Why is it even in there?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:45 PM
1

I'm not ok with taking other hard working peoples property at the barrel of a gun. Does that help answer your question? Do you understand the incredible amount of human work that goes into many medical procedures? Should we really just take the rewards of all of that hard work from some and hand it to others?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:44 PM
1

And men are in the same situation, also fearing that they can't be in a room alone with a member of the opposite sex. How horrible gender relations have become.since we decided to improve them with legislation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:40 PM
1

This simply isn't how the world works. You are being bought when you sign your work contract, and people buy what they want, that may be good quals, it might be a pleasant personality to work with, maybe eye candy, maybe a combonof the three. Be glad that you were born with an unfair employment advantage, might help make up for the employment disadvantages you have such as maternity leave and gender quotas in education.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:38 PM
1

Whether something is illegal or not shouldn't have affect your moral compass. Stop using that argument, most adults won't take it seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:35 PM
1

People, for some stupid reason, don't realise that reward for work isn't about difficulty, its about production, and demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:29 PM
3

People who say "I'd rather pay more taxes to hell the poor" are almost always people who would be net beneficiaries of this system, in my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:26 PM
1

Single mother families are the root of a HUGE chunk of.crime. If crime reduction is the goal we need to address the incentives we give women to become single mothers. We need to.take the artificial legal and financial power from the that they currently have over men. Ie we need to reduce welfare, and allow fathers to talk away from children they don't want, and have equal custody of children they do want. Ie give men the exact same.rights that women have, while reducing the welfare we throw at e…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:24 PM
1

Far fewer people would be homeless and hopeless if regulations were dropped allowing people to build homes how and where they wanted and to start work at a job for low low pay to gain the experience necessary to be worth the current minimum wage that many aren't and therefore are priced out of the job market.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:21 PM
1

The oligarcy comes no matter what so long as the peasents want to believe that the elite are in it for the good of the population. It's so dumb too, I go to work for me, you go to work for you, but politicians job is to help US. Lol retarded, but whilever the peasents are this this it doesn't matter the system, oligarcies will be the ruling force
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:18 PM
1

Capitalism has given such wealth to the poorest people that they can live off what is thrown out at Walmart. If you weren't jealous of the ultra wealthy you wouldnt be blinded by how much wealthier the poorest are now than ever before in history.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:14 PM
1

Hardly fair if you are using coersion to attain the money to just GIVE everyone an income for nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:12 PM
2

You don't get it. Laisez faire isn't about who works the hardest. And most of your post is "this is my opinion, FACT!". Only people who already agree take arguments like this seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:09 PM
1

No they don't. Everyone is always at the ugly end of banter, its just that women are weak as fuck and can't brush it off. This is my whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 10:09 PM
1

I dont because no one else does. The issue has nothing to do with whether or not a womans treatment fits into a category and everything to do with how she feels about the treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 11:33 AM
1

In the appropriate context, we do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 11:32 AM
1

It's part of the human experience, nothing will stop that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 04:43 AM
1

It has legitimate follow on effects which affects society as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 04:43 AM
1

I'm self employed. I am sick of the overbearing social narrative about how men are mean to women and how I have to be subjected to it in every circle, on the radio, and how it affects my friends and family.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 04:14 AM
1

Only social norms affect me because I don't and won't work with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 03:39 AM
1

I dont give a fuck what the legal precedent is, Im talking about the new social norms that women are learning about as they enter the workplace at rates never before seen in our modern culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 01:45 AM
1

...serious comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 01:08 AM
2

The point is that people who bitch about workplace banter should harden up. Going back to my first post, I believe that equal banter is brand new 'harassment' from the perspective of the average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 12:48 AM
1

Men sexually harrass each other as part of banter everyday at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 09:25 PM
4

Ethical? According to who?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 11:45 AM
1

The comment is aimed at society.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 11:40 AM
2

Its typical to everyone, harden the fuck up and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 11:11 AM
2

Because men don't do that to each other every day?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 09:48 AM
2

Real harassment happens in all environment, do you think weak men have it easy on construction sites? But society only cares when it affects women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 09:46 AM
1

No. The options are: She chooses to keep it. She chooses to rid herself of it (plan b, abortion, give it to him, give it to the state) He chooses to keep it. He chooses to rid himself of it ("no thanks, do what you want with it"). All of these options are reasonable, but only mem have been stripped of some of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 09:45 AM
11

I think that with the brand new prevalence of women in male dominated workplaces many women feel harassed because of the following. This is the first time those particular women have ever been treated as equals.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 11:46 PM
1

All of a man's options are options shared with women, except they get more options, and they are the one who ultimately get the decision on which option. Not cool. Why does one gender get to choose the consequence for both parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 11:31 PM
1

Yeah, just like women can.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 07:43 AM
1

There are so many facilities in place for a mother tongive her child to someone if she feels the need. No option for me. Get it yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 03:42 AM
1

OK, you actually really don't follow. What you said is true for both men and women. The difference is that the woman needs no permission from a man to abandon the child from conception until its a toddler, but a man needs a mother's permission to do the same. This is a legal, and in my opinion a moral issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 02:07 AM
2

And he can't do the same to her. The only difference is that she can hold him accountable for it, and he can't do the same to her. Do you understand or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 12:01 AM
1

It's not going to die. And yes, not my fault or problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 10:19 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 10:04 PM
1

Which would have been her choice. The dude would have never chosen for her to carry: t to term.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:58 PM
3

I truly don't understand how you could miss this.. Yes he can take it, if she lets him Yes he can give it up for adoption. If she lets him. Get it now?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:57 PM
1

She is already getting my money and I've never met either of them. Don't you understand my point. If the law didn't unfairly target men it would be her problem. And I'm fine with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:46 PM
1

"Fact!" I literally don't care. We can see that it's her choices that put responsibility on men that men have been legally forced to take. Whether you are right or wrong we can see clearly that it's inherently unfair, and not because of biology but law.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:42 PM
1

Her obviously. She already gets my money for nothing and I'm not even the father.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:35 PM
1

The man's choice: Pay for it. Keep it. Let' it go if she also chooses to. Woman's choices: Keep it and have help paying for it. Let it go. See how those aren't both the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:34 PM
1

It won't die you idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:32 PM
1

I'm a libertarian. The same shit will happen that happens to every other species where the mother doesn't attract a providing father. She will look after it, or not. Like the billions of other mammals on earth. Your argument is literally "if women are pieces of shit men need to pay for it, because her choices will lead to abused children". Pretty sexist, I'd say. I hold.women to a higher expectation than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:29 PM
1

Yeah I did. I don't believe in welfare, and I've made it clear that I think men should have the same opt out rights as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:22 PM
3

Right but while the woman can make that choice alone, the man cannot. And this is way past the conception/pregnancy/bodily autonomy stage.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:20 PM
1

I am a libertarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:19 PM
1

If you want to keep making the 'its biology' argument men would just walk away after conception. It's clearly not a biological issue but a legal rights issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:15 PM
1

You've done a good job of proving that the 'biology isn't fair' argument sucks balls.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:13 PM
1

No they don't, zero consequence giving up a year old baby, but if they choose not to either can men. What BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:11 PM
1

Tell that to all of the screaming baby boys getts their dicks sliced into.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:11 PM
2

I'm not afraid that I won't be her best, its just not as good if you aren't providing her the clear best and preferably first experiences, its like having your own child vs adopting a 15 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:04 PM
9

This, the nature argument is BS because naturally the man can walk away from the entire relationship at conception.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 09:01 PM
3

While it's understandable that she can abort the responsibility at any point, she can give it away after the birth. At least afford men THAT right if you want to do the whole "its her body her choice". It's also her choice to abort the relationship with the kid AFTER its born. Why not his too?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:59 PM
-1

There is already state sponsored 100% effective birth control. The woman can give it up years after its born consequence free.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 08:57 PM
4

If you want to break the it from a standard applied to humans to a standard applied to each sex. Sure. Go one further and consider each standard set to each individual and now double standards can't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 04:13 AM
6

It's literally true. My ex is still pining after me. 2 guys later. Shes hot too, really seriously pretty. But she is disappointed be her last 2 because she wants me even though our breakup was very mutual. If you are into milfs that's a sexual thing, people are into body, looks and ages, races etc sexually, its personality traits that people are emotionally attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 04:11 AM
5

Dude no. Fat bitches that only want hot dudes are annoying because its a tactic that works against us. It works FOR women though. People slut it up and it works AGAINST future partners but it works for them self. Leo can and will fuck who he wants, if that's 19 year old supermodels power to him. Doesn't make him a hypocrite just that he upholds double standards, and if he can do that then it proves how desirable he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 04:09 AM
2

It's got nothing to do with whether I'm worried and everything to do with it being a nicer experience being the best bf someone has had by a mile, instead of being flavour of the year.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 03:59 AM
4

It's literally better to date young fresh women instead of older experienced cold women. I'm not insecure, I've dated women 10 years older than me, but young inexperienced girl literally make for warmer sweeter doe eyed cuties.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 03:58 AM
5

It's not hypocrisy, hypocrisy isbwhen you say you won't do something but do it anyways, or vice versa. If Leonardo only.went after 19 year old supermodels with 8 packs despite being a 50 year old dude with a beer gut you wouldn't think he was a hypocrite. That's because it isn't hypocrisy, its a double standard. And double standards in dating is fine. For example, my gf loves that I have a big dick, but if she had a big dick it wouldn't be OK with me. It's a double standard and they are OK and n…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 03:54 AM
4

So you and your partner are sluts. I'm a slut, and my partner is an exceptionally low count affectionate sweetheart. I know that I'd prefer to be a slut because it makes me feel good. And I know that I'd prefer a young hottie I can give new experiences to, and who doesn't pine for an ex. So I've got it the best of both worlds and you have only got an average count and a gf with a much much higher count than mine, no new experiences you can show her, no sexual exploring she can do with you. Etc e…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 03:38 AM
7

How the fuck is he a hypocrite? He says he doesn't want fat chicks, if he then fucked fat chicks he'd be a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 03:33 AM
6

It's not irony. It's a double standard. What's the problem? Double standards exist all over the dating playground, its part of there being 2 sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/16 03:31 AM
6

They want both, in my and I dare say most people's experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 12:42 AM
1

TRP posters know full well that it isnt true. They treat it as true practically but know that its not literally true.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 07:32 AM
1

The stances I reffered to are mindsets. Its the standpoint that the people come from, not whether they are right or not. So whether they are right or not matters little if 2 people debating cannot take the standpoint of the other the point will go straight past them, or simply offend them because they cannot see the views the other person has from their perspective. A huge part of why left vs right politics will ALWAYS exist no matter what evidence can be provided one way or another.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 02:20 AM
1

Youve still missed the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 12:51 AM
4

Youve got to be joking, nursing sucks, no doubt but its an 'eww' that takes about a week to get over, you can tile and tile and tile and it never gets any easier or cooler when your out in the sun standing on a reflective surface.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 12:51 AM
1

I feel as thought you have missed my point, and probably dont understand the terminology being used.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 10:28 PM
4

Because I am unaware of any woman who alleges to have been kept out of those jobs. Of course they dont complain that men are readily employed as roofers and women arent, no one wants to be a roofer.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 05:07 AM
10

Why arent you concerned whether women are actively kept out of roofing? Fencing? Plumbing? Garbage collection? It isnt because men take care of those jobs AND THOSE JOBS SUCK.. is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 03:11 AM
13

As for the other jobs, are women being prevented from doing them? Exactly my point. No concern about what percentage of women are actually in the crap jobs, only whether they have the right to do them, AND what percentage of women are in the huge paying office jobs. This incredibly one sided concern is the exact point most here are making.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 03:06 AM
1

Genuinely well written deflection.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 03:05 AM
1

We both know that thats not the norm. Sounds like medicine.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 02:14 AM
1

Unless you;re the accountant or general manager, you;d have no idea what sex is better financially for the company. And we all know that generally speaking men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 01:58 AM
8

OP: One amazing thing that so many women miss is benevolent sexism. Men, by default, treat women much better than they treat other men, they help them when they need a quick favour, they are much less aggressive toward them socially, they defend them from other men etc etc. When men treat women as equals, like they treat other men, its an amazing difference compared to how they normally get treated and this small subset of men willing to treat you equally appear to be sexist. If I were willing t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 01:32 AM
2

Every piece of information that you arent SURE about with unquestionable current evidence is an assumption. You simply take the info you have about the label you can throw on something and subconsciously assume what you can about that person, thing, event, etc If you are hiring 2 people and one is a woman and one is a man, and both are 25 and both are equally qualified its still going to be assumed that the man will work more hours, try harder to earn a raise, take less sick and holiday days and…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 01:23 AM
13

And there are hardly any women on the front line, tiling roofs, underground mining, or working on the sewers. How sexist must all of those industries be!!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 01:13 AM
1

With.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 11:52 PM
4

I feel like humour isba developed part of personality and those who are valued more for their beauty whether male or female are going to put less effort into developing positive personality traits on average. This is my theory on why most of the funny people I know are fat dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 10:41 PM
2

The way you're writing seems to exclude the scores of murderers who aren't and won't ever be caught. I'd hazard to guess the marriage rate of all killers is average and I have no reason to believe otherwise. Mostly because I'd imagine the majority are never caught because they are just normal doctors, police officers, workers at nursing homes etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 09:18 PM
2

What? I'm just implying that murders probably have partners at the same rate as non murderers.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 07:16 PM
1

I think that at the point that someone has ultimatums about dress sense the relationship is over. If my GF alluded to wanting to see me in more (insert type of dress sense here) id just do it or work with her, if I werent willing to, id not respect her if she put up with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 11:07 AM
6

Same amount of women as there are murderers multiplied by the percentage of women who are in relationships id say.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 10:40 AM
2

While they both talk about theory, trp believes that only one answer can be true and TBP believes that whatever an individual FEELS is right is true for them. Hence my original assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 02:41 AM
1

It seems that a few of us, and quite a few upvotes believe that it is you know isnt following the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 01:40 AM
3

Thats not the question that I asked or the point I was alluding to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 01:40 AM
4

Do you genuinely believe that philosophy changes in just 200 years? Do you believe that the way society works, the strategies people employ, the way we think and reason, the goals of humans, has changed dramatically within the period or recorded history?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 10:58 PM
1

You have the reading comprehension of a toddler. Stop posting.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 10:42 PM
21

The real issue is that BP tend to be moral objectivists and RP tend to be moral relativists, and BP are fact relativists and RP are fact objectivists.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 10:40 PM
2

Men do more of EVERYTHING. Collectively and comparatively, women don't do anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 04:26 AM
4

You will never understand what this is like. Men never have to face this. This is what highschool feels like because men are assaulted far more often and by bigger groups than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 08:10 AM
2

With her hymen. Jk
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 12:05 AM
5

How good your lawyer is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 09:22 PM
-5

Very unique shaming tactics. Not.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 07:08 AM
0

free speech is a right Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 06:07 AM
12

It's a subreddit...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 05:41 AM
6

We judge ourselves by our intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 05:40 AM
9

Ita not -inherently- harmful.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 08:16 AM
6

I only read the tldr, but it didn't say superior to women. It said superior to other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 04:47 AM
1

He attacks her rather than he point, yep. Its not go anything to do with my point though, you know,cos its not in real life, and the genders are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 01:32 PM
1

Fucked if I know, I havnt read it bro. Why dont you read it and decide.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 01:20 PM
1

Its not the same thing because it isnt online. The example I gave isnt a true example of my point, its just an example of an exchange with 2 people using the tactics. Its not in real life, its not possible to show a real life example because you an I are -on the internet-. So no, I havnt read it and your synopsis tells me that its ALSO not an example of the actual OP point because its on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 01:14 PM
1

Never said it was unreasonable, I said that if I were a man, in real life, and the other person was a man, I wouldnt smack talk unless I was prepared to get physical, which women get away with. You're intentionally missing the point. I'm not buying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 12:50 PM
1

I swear you are way too mad for this scenario. get a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 11:49 AM
1

Thats not what I said. You are so mad, Just give up.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 12:20 AM
1

I didn't read it. Its completely unnecessary. I made my point and I don't care
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 12:47 PM
1

Honestly dude. Why are you so mad? It is a perfect example.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 12:33 PM
1

Because it has an example of the contrast being referred to. I really dont understand how you dont get this. "Hey guys here is an example of two kinds of debate tactics, we also tend to see these in real life, I think these are the reasons why we see these in real life."
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 12:06 PM
1

Its completely irrelevant because none of whats being discussed is relevant online because no one can punch anyone in the mouth for being a fuckwit. So sorry, but its not relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 11:38 AM
1

I have NO IDEA. I havn't read the whole comment chain and I probably wont because its completely irrelevant to the point we are discussing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 10:49 AM
1

The OP point is that men tend to not insult and belittle and frustrate while women do tend to. That was an example of a person not attempting to frustrate debating someone who was. Tobshow the contrast.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 09:22 AM
1

Its beside the point. I literally used it to demonstrate a disparity in debate technique. It was online not in real life so it doesnt demonstrate the results of said disparity in real life debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 02:59 AM
1

Probably. Cant treat them like men but can we? Can't treat them equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 02:14 AM
1

Keen on roofing? Formwork carpentry? Smelting?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 02:07 AM
1

It's an example of the contrast in debating style.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 02:03 AM
2

Its not relevant if there is no threat of violence. The linked example was just a recent and easy to find example with an argument breaking down into name calling and attempts to frustrate.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 10:19 PM
2

I havnt even read the rest of the comment chain because online is not a relevant example and it has nothing to do with how men act toward women or how women act toward women, only how men and women act differently toward men in real life.`
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 10:03 PM
2

the opposite would be a woman online NOT acting like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:27 PM
1

Its a fucking example. if you dont agree, disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 12:37 PM
0

the point has nothing to do with online interactions. Stay on point
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 11:31 AM
2

Women dont want to work in underground mining or logging. And it doesnt matter how good OHS is logging will always be much more dangerous, and therefore command a higher pay than other jobs. What else ya got?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 10:58 AM
2

If you want the same pay you need to work the dangerous jobs too. "Well the jobs shouldn't be so dangerous." While.men get paid more they work jobs which have a high resultant suicide rate, such as surgeons and fly in fly out miners. "Well mental health should be fixed". Never once admitting that the advantages men have overall are tradeoffs. Always asking for the beneficial result only.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 09:50 AM
1

Women deflect all of the downsides of being a man as if they aren't male issues but are instead individual non related issues. They want the good but deflect the bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 09:38 AM
3

The same people who do almost everything on the planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 08:36 AM
1

That's the core point. Different tactics among genders
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 07:09 AM
1

Right, different tactics.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 02:43 AM
6

If you are a man, go to a bar and during a friendly debate, call the other guy names or belittle him. Id be willing to bet you wont because you know what the consequences might be.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 02:10 AM
1

The point is about women antagonising men in person, in ways that men dont antagonise men in person.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 02:06 AM
11

Women are antagonistic to men that they are unwilling to fight- to their faces, men are typically not. This is the OP point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 02:04 AM
10

Not addressing the OP point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:02 AM
1

Here is a great example of an exchange between me and a woman using the tactics I am talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 12:11 AM
8

Interesting you do this. I made this point recently, how women and men play by different rules when debating. Doing things specifically to try and make me frustrated and uncomfortable doesn't fly in male on male debates because punches get thrown when this happens. I'll save this conversation for future reference. Thank-you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 11:55 PM
7

You're convincing no one by getting the last say and making no argument. Grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 11:28 PM
3

My experiences make me believe that you don't consider the things that women do to men as bad and you consider the things men do to women as worse. Women have the social balance of power and they use it. It's like the videos that contrast men being physical with women in public and vice versa. Many people just think it's not that bad when women do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 10:35 PM
2

It's a bit factual that for sure . Edit:people who are net burdens on the system love socialisation, they constantly see the benefits, people who can't afford it getting handouts, free housing good quality food and healthcare but they rarely if ever see or feel the downsides. Those who vote for less socialisation tend to be those who work months of the year only to donate it to the poor, women, other peoples children and students.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:55 PM
2

No doubt. It doesn't change the fact that overall, women, the poor and students are net burdens of the system and everyone else foots the bill while receiving less than they give.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:51 PM
1

Good job trying to be condescending while not attacking his argument at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:49 PM
13

Good job trying to be condescending while not attacking his argument at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:49 PM
4

People DO respond with physical violence, 2016. Sorry that that wasn't self evident for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:41 PM
2

Significantly higher burden on govt services, specifically healthcare, govt funded education, pensions etc
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:39 PM
2

If you're female, below average total income or a student and especially any combination, almost certainly.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:27 PM
2

Yeah, all of the people who heavily vote for more wealth distribution, who make the same claim as you, "to spread the love and help the needy" are the people who are a net burden on the tax system.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:24 PM
6

This is the standard fallacious feminist deflection for anything to do with the downside of being treated like a man. 97% of workplace deaths "Workplaces should be safer" 80% of homicide victims "People shouldn't kill" 99% of war deaths "People shouldn't fight" 70% of assault victims "People shouldn't hit each other" Every single disadvantage of being a man is always deflected as though it's not a male issue but an issue with that one particular area of life. Pointless deflection. Every aspect o…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:20 PM
1

You've achieved nothing but agree with op because of your mutual feelz
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 09:16 PM
4

It's easy to make that argument when you are either poor or female or a student. When you say helping the community, you mean helping me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 07:54 PM
7

In the past women had to treat interactions with men like men had to treat them. Shut your fucking mouth or be prepared for physical confrontation. Sounds equal to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 07:49 PM
1

There's literally no point discussing my principles here. What I can offer is the suggestion that if one wants control of their life they must take responsibility for the consequences of their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 07:43 PM
1

Again. Objectively wrong. If morality was factual and set in stone why do cultures, in groups, and different eras have different sets of common morals? We're the Romans right, or you? Was Hitler's millions of followers right, or you? Were the Mongolians right, or you? Is Isis right, or you? Are Buddhist monks right, or you? Are millitant vegans right, or you? Billions of people, billions of opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 11:38 PM
-4

He should probably watch out that he doesn't get yelled at for putting his hands on a stranger. The callsign of a person who has never first night fucked a chick.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:45 PM
1

also seemingly a male creation Not much that isnt.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:16 PM
1

Honest to god, Look Ill give you the benefit of the doubt and explain this to you. In the past we have discussed on this very forum the key difference between people who are BP and RP a hundred times and one common thread is that RP and BP people tend to view morals and fact differently. Typically BP are moral objectivists and fact relativists. Typically RP are moral relativists and fact objectivists. This means that BP people believe that facts depend on who you ask but morals are set in stone,…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 08:41 PM
1

Unfortunately you are objectively wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 11:48 AM
1

Nothing is morally justifiable. Morals are opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 11:14 AM
1

It would depend on the circumstances, is my opinion on the morality of shaming people for having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:48 AM
1

The purpose of discourse and debate is to take a stance. My stance is that in all of the OP examples the person taking the risk needs to take responsibility for ALL possible consequences of that risk whether they agree with the consequences or not. Morals are only opinions to those who have not developed a stance as to what morality is. I dont understand. Are you claiming that once you have decided on your moral stance then that moral position is a fact, regardless of anything else? You obviousl…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:14 AM
1

Obnoxious, loud, and probably pretty insecure and unhappy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 10:06 AM
1

So you are saying that girls being slut shamed don't deserve it, then? Nope, I havnt said that either. You answered a question about the morality of slut shaming by stating that they know the consequences of their actions. Yes I did. This implies that you are responding to the question posed, and that because the consequences are bad then they should correct their behavior. No, it doesnt. It simply points out that there are forseeable consequences and (let me directly quote myself) "It up to the…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:54 AM
1

The question is about what is moral. Morals are opinions. You cant ask if it is moral, only if an individual finds an action immoral or not in a given circumstance. You were suggesting previously that because the consequences of their actions (having sex) are negative (being slut shamed), that their actions deserve their treatment. Actually no I didnt, I never said that anyone DESERVED anything, just that actions have consequences and often those consequences can be pretty easily forseen. You ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:23 AM
1

It also implies men can't be piv raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 11:23 PM
2

Because I've been in casual relationships with dozens of women and LTRs with a few. There is no better metric than a person who had female hormonal balance who now has a male hormonal balance. Can you think of something better ?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:06 PM
2

You Havnt addressed my points. At best you've said "but i know one person who engaged on official debate tournaments", assuming that I suggested that all men do this. I didn't, I said that in social debates men and women play by different rules. And yes the properties that come from women who believe that they are top tier intellectuals tends to not be the properties men are looking for in women. While women value a partner who values their intellect and the attitudes and properties that tend to…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:38 PM
2

I are arguing with me while I try and discuss with you.. My Mrs has an exceptionally high libido for a woman, however she has no idea what its like with another 1500% more testosterone than she currently has. Please, look up accounts of people who once had female hormones and now have male hormones, your eyes will be opened. I guarantee it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:32 PM
2

If you Havnt read any work by women who go on test for sex change purposes I'd suggest you do. They are literally the only women in the world who can answer this question and they NOW find what you are suggesting to be completely laughable. If you are genuinely here to learn and understand the perspective of other you will hit google and find accounts from women who have taken test.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:12 PM
2

Your point is interesting. Firstly its likely that men on the whole don't find the same things interesting as women do and vice versa. I like mechanical things specifically but il settle on just conversation and thought about how the physical world works. Women tend to enjoy conversation and thought about how social dynamics work. It's easy to why a man's perspective would be that of the above poster, given these common traits. Also, women LOVE to suggest that "men can't handle X property" or "m…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:09 PM
1

I'm looking at you tumbl circlejerkers
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:49 PM
1

Again, there are consequences for actions. If a person wants any semblance of control over their life they must take responsibility for their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:22 PM
2

No one says the shouldn't. It up to the individual if the consequences of their actions are worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:21 PM
7

They know the consequences of their actions before they take them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 12:58 PM
12

People are responsible for their own choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:27 AM
3

No idea, Ive never lived in a world where the sexes DONT get equal pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:22 AM
6

I have no idea why you believe this. It feels a hell of a lot like a straw man for the sake of it. You realise that TRP is almost entirely about male relationships with women right? It's not primarily about men dealing with men, so that's why male on male advice is underrepresented.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 12:09 AM
9

TRP is a great reminder of the things I need to do to make sure she wants me. Not 'he's ok', not 'he's a cool guy', but absolutely want to hang off me, feel lucky to be with me, and be happy that in the knowledge that her man is a disciplined masculine guy who will do the job whatever it is if need be.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 07:51 AM
2

Niggas be hustlin' in reverse. You gotta chase the money, the bitches come with it -Kanye
/r/TheRedPill03/01/16 07:38 AM
1

Yeah and for both sexes. The top 20% of athletes get 80% of the trophies. Top 10% of students get 100% of the distinctions Etc Etc Etc
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 02:44 AM
1

My coint is in the 30s and im 25. The count includes much older women, threesomes, and dating up to 3 women while sport fucking others at the sane time with full disclosure to all of them. Id say it helps. Its just like a wedding ring or gettong your fuckbuddy to plant a lipstick kiss on your neck at tge start of the night. Its just a strong resume.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 11:26 PM
3

He didnt say anything about gangs. Where do you pull this shit from? He is talking about aportbike riders. You have no idea what they look like because they have full length suits on and wear full face helmets, you cant even tell what gender they are when 5 ride fast at mach 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 11:19 PM
4

That is absolutely the case in my opinion. I work and play in the car enthusiast world and how often i hear guys call their wife 'the boss', or the 'minister if finances', 'she who must be obeyed' and every other variation of the above when explaining why they cant use the money they earned to buy the things or experiences that they want. Every day on any mens hobby forum you will read people talk and talk and talk about the tool/carpart/training/experience they want but cant have because happy …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 11:10 PM
9

Lots of people, including women, do all sorts of horrible antisocial things to people who are on the bottom of the food chain.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 09:05 AM
8

And the women in the OP didnt exhibit fat person behavior?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 07:44 AM
4

If most women fuck only the top few guys than women have fewer partners, only the top few guys. Lets say a median of 3, for this argument. Because most of the guys have a count of zero, they can lower the median to only zero, but the few guys who fuck all of the women are fucking 20+ women so they bring the median up a LOT, to say 5. Men and women will always have the same average number of partners but different median. Average is not the same as median.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 07:32 AM
2

Be top 10% and gape a tonne of those girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 07:48 AM
-6

You are the first person in the whole thread who has mentioned marriage. NEXT.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 03:55 AM
0

I feel bad for your future partner if you would only be with them on the proviso that you had them so screwed down that they were scared to leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 03:40 AM
1

I replied to the wrong person, I completely agree with you not yo radical.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 02:45 AM
1

Ah, subject matter is kinda relevant when you are discussing a subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 02:28 AM
2

I only half agree, its not that they cant comprehend it, its that their life experiences dont give them a LOT of fair views on ethics.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 02:26 AM
3

Holy shit, If she was a guy she would have her jaw punched from her face.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 01:47 AM
1

You do understand that's not relevant to atlas' point, your discussion with him, OR the OP, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 01:35 AM
4

Its not better but its different. Advantages: Variety in everything from conversation, sex, activities, manner etc Always have the upper hand and the very clear ability to walk away so you will always get respect if you are worth it and deserve it. Dont ever need to put up with bullshit or drama ever. Tonnes and tonnes and tonnes of enthusiastic sex. Much easier to be treated the way girls get treated (Have food and drinks and activities paid for, get driven around, flirt with whoeever you want …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 01:20 AM
1

Yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 01:16 AM
2

They are much more willing to be plated while pining for a relationship. That's close enough to the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 12:36 AM
2

I don't understand you. Do you mind explaining?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 12:11 AM
2

That's exactly how my partner sees it. She is an adorable sexy very low count babe and best if all isn't an argumentative opinionated moron like so many that attack traditional gender roles. Ie she is very pleasant to be around. Charming even. And while I have no intention of getting the govt in on our relationship I enjoy the trust, affection and companionship that I have earned and am in an LTR with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 11:45 PM
7

You're putting a tonne of words in his mouth. He never said or implied any of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 11:43 PM
1

OP: Attractive = Sexual success Sexual success=Confidence Confidence therefore = attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 11:32 AM
2

I completely agree with the above poster.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/15 08:31 AM
0

I dont hit them but some light choking is normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 04:17 AM
7

If I own a garage with a ferrari, a lambo, a porsche and a McLaren, im not going to just pick my favourite when the rest are ready to be driven whenever I feel like it. /thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 12:15 PM
2

OP you just dont have a clue, you are belting out strawmen at an alarming rate,
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 12:54 PM
1

Im secure as fuck, she can do what she wants she is a big girl. She wouldnt do anything that would risk losing me so its all good.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 12:43 PM
15

I got halfway through your first line and out loud said: "Eat a dick".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 12:41 PM
1

op: Claiming that its a double standard assumes that both sexes are identical, which they arent. Thats literally the whole answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 12:21 PM
5

Its a bit like CG in film, or plastic surgery. You only know it exists when its failed, not when it worked.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/15 10:21 AM
2

It wasnt a personal attack it was an attack on the quality of the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 10:22 AM
2

They get the 3 extra years because life is literally safer for them. So they get the 3 years and less to worry about. Do you genuinely not understand or are you persevering for another reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 08:13 AM
2

The exact same scenarios happen to men the world over. Its not a gender issue. Social pressure to behave in specific ways, and take on specific roles due to gender, with potentially violent outcomes are common for both sexes. Id prefer to be a woman in almost every part of the world if the scenario is "Would you feel safer". World wide women live longer and with better health because they have significantly less violence used on them. This isnt a debate here, this is fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 08:06 AM
1

So you are saying that some women have hardships because they are expected to and feel forced to take on specific roles in a relationship? Im fairly certain this also happens to men. As a result of the fact that this happens to both genders, I dont believe it is a gender issue its simply a social or cultural issue that affect sboth sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 08:01 AM
1

Most of these points arent really gender issues specifically they are just third world issues. 1- being forced to take a specific role in a relationship and endanger yourself regardless of laws. 2- being forced to take a specific role in a relationship and endanger yourself for your family 3- Limited access to healthcare specific to your socially or economically forced relationship role 4- yep 5- Being in constant thread of violent crime being committed against you. Id say only the 4th one is re…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 07:52 AM
1

Neither am I. Its universally true worldwide.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 03:20 PM
1

Women are net parasites on in the taxation system where men are net hosts. That is undisputable. Its not about whether you were on welfare its about the fact that you cost more tax than you pay.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 12:34 AM
3

More guys would prefer to have casual sex with a 7 than a committed relationship with a 9 that the same for women. Thats the point here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 12:19 AM
3

The dating market like many things is a free market. Feminism has made marriage amazing for women, men back away from marriage. Feminism has made getting pregnant at work awesome, employers hire less family aged women. etc etc. The free market evens everything up.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 12:13 AM
2

I said it could be fine, or it could be not fine, and we dont know because we werent there.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 11:14 AM
4

Sounds like most hot girls who have orbiters.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 04:25 AM
2

Sounds like she was asking him to do her a favour? No idea what the tone was though right, if she is umming and ahhing out loud about the temperature it does sound like her problem, if her tone was friendly then he could offer to do her the favour, but maybe she was trying to lord her power within the relationship over him and the correct response to that would be to 'be an asshole', and as I just said, not for no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 04:22 AM
8

You are literally just making up BS like a feminist blog. Stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 11:58 AM
9

I disagree with you. It gives the opportunity to take the magic, the myth, the lies away from male female interactions by allowing men to experience many of them from a less emotional perspective. It was a very important way for me to understand future relationships and grow.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/15 11:57 AM
1

There are a lot of 'shoulds' here Id hazard to guess because the blue/left are the opposite of the libartarian leaning red/right.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/15 12:52 AM
0

Absolutely, I am by far the best partner my current partner and my last partner has ever had, you could ask them yourself. They have both come a long way within the respective relationships and are happier now for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/15 12:48 AM
14

You're being downvoted for good reason. Lets be honest. You are treating adults like children.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/15 09:26 AM
10

I had an N count of over 20, and a few threesomes in there and a 6 year LTR when I discovered TRP. So nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/15 08:42 AM
4

The most "insert extremity here" anything are usually men. So.. yeah, thats a redundant point really.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 11:39 PM
2

You're really not getting to me. Your efforts are wasted, I wont reply again.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 11:14 PM
4

Most men arent able to observe what happens to average women online. This exercise allows them to do that. Understand now?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 11:12 PM
2

This is a piss poor attempt at a shallow insult. Im not insulted. I slay compared to the average guy, I know what the average guy manages to get out of women and what he has to put in, I used to be one, and the majority of my friends are those guys. I now do as well as the top 10% guys I used to be jealous of, and Im pretty happy with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 11:10 PM
3

In stormfront core ideas is the promoting of freedom of speech, but then you want to tone police TRP. Look basically you should shelf a cactus. Im done.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 09:58 PM
2

Thats your opinion. You need to understand that TRP is very classic liberal leaning. You probably dont agree with most of their political ideas. The fact that I can guess your gender by your ideas, and your political leaning by your gender is exactly TRPs point in this case. IE: you are actively proving them right.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 09:53 PM
2

I am one of 'they' and I would prefer women didnt vote because they collectively vote against my interests, and their own in many cases, they seem very easily swayed by group think and propaganda. Just like you would prefer the 1% didnt vote, or anyone else working against your interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 09:49 PM
2

I didnt say that. i dont think that women are backwards retards but men find the emotion over logic approach that many women take most of the time pretty backward and retarded. Compared to what society tells us women like, they do crave abuse, and they do despise supplication and excess niceness. And women do vote humongously left which links up with the emotion over logic thing. Unlike you I can cut through the language and at least understand the points being made, while I dont agree with all …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 09:41 PM
3

Read the top comment. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 08:49 PM
1

So let me get this straight, german women arent as into male dominance and power as american women are?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 08:45 PM
3

You have to be the most brain dead fuck if you cant manage to kill yourself. IE: if you fail its because you probably werent serious. This doesnt mean that you dont need help, but suicide attempts as a concept is silly, they arent really attempts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 08:44 PM
2

Tonnes of what is said is not PC in this day and age, but its still completely correct. Id prefer to know how to have great relationships with women than to be politically correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 08:41 PM
12

OP: It sounds like you are a lady, which is great because you already understand full well how many losers message you if you have a dating site profile. What you probably dont realize is that the reality of the extent of losers messaging women is completely unknown to all but the most sexually successful men. It wasnt until I got into a few relationships with hot girls that I realized that a dozens men a week try and contact them even on facebook when they have relationship status. This is impo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 08:37 PM
2

TRP helped me a lot. My partner is a lovely young lady who I adore and who adores me, and I very much doubt I would be with her if it werent for TRP. TRP also allowed me to have more sex than I really should have made time for before this relationship, seems cool to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 08:34 PM
4

You are unquestionably wrong in some of your points, which basically invalidates everything else you posted. Its hard to take you seriously with claims like : "It has always been politically incorrect to say certain things out loud."
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 08:15 PM
10

Ability to earn income as a start.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 08:09 PM
1

No I didnt, I looked it up to post it here and show you. Fuck. Can I block you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 07:54 PM
1

You literally arent using the same definition as I find when I look up poverty. Impoverished means poor. Poverty is a specific threshold of poorness compared to you peers. Seriously, start by googling the definition of the word you are arguing about.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 09:38 AM
1

I literally didnt say that whatsoever. All I have done is said that because the definition of poverty means that no matter how wealthy a country gets, people will always 'live in poverty'. That means you literally cannot eliminate poverty, which is what you seem to want to do. But you cant, its in the definition, some of the population will always be poor compared to the rest of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 08:39 AM
1

Its clear to me that you literally dont know what the word means. All of your future posts will be ignored or mocked, thankyou.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 11:12 PM
1

No for real, the poverty line as you know it is called 'relative poverty' and it simply consists a fraction of society. Here is the definition from poverty.org.uk: "Relative poverty refers to a standard which is defined in terms of the society in which an individual lives and which therefore differs between countries and over time. An income-related example would be living on less than X% of average UK income. Absolute poverty and relative poverty are both valid concepts." Absolute poverty is no…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 11:04 PM
2

People are buying nicer houses, nicer education, and nicer healthcare. The cost for the same services and products from years past is cheaper. Life is literally getting cheaper, not more expensive. Do you not understand that, or are you trying to make a separate point?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 01:08 PM
2

We literally arent going backwards in any economic metric.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 12:51 PM
1

I agree with that but it STILL doesnt change the core fact that everything is more affordable than it ever was, its out attitudes that are making us feel like we are going in reverse, not our reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 12:09 PM
2

Yeah technical interests all my life, I think in words.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 10:49 AM
5

The poverty line floats with the rest of societies wealth. In Saudi Arabia you can make 200k and be in poverty in some areas. Eliminating poverty is like eliminating the bottom 10%, by definition it can't be done.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 10:45 AM
2

25/M Self employed, welding, automotive related projects. Full time. Partner is a nurse in aged care. Single mum, various part time jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 09:20 AM
2

Its not relevant because my point is that thy could raise their kids and have living standards themselves far greater than past generations on a single income. Going bankrupt is a sign of living beyond ones means which is exactly the point I am making this whole conversation. I am a former charismatic but not sexually successful who used TRP to get a wake up call regarding my own improvement, and get some blunt reminders about sexual dynamics and since then has done amazingly dating for fun bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 09:05 AM
3

The concept of a living wage is a joke. Go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 08:52 AM
3

That isn't relevant to my point. And hell no.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 08:50 AM
2

Yeah it doesnt refute anything I said about how we want two incomes and really only need one.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 08:21 AM
1

The injury rate and general wear and tear on your body is vastly different between male dominated and female dominated fields. There is a bunch of stuff. Im going to go back to my original point which is that we all have it awesome and the problem is that we feel entitled to live incredibly privileged lives, and it saddens us that we must work for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 08:17 AM
5

Whats the dilemma? If you want to have all of the luxuries, the healthcare and education that royalty had 30 years ago, 2 people will need jobs to support what that costs. If you just want to go back to the OP question, women have it easier still, which is easily shown by their mental health VS mens, suicide vs mens, and life expectancy especially in work related circumstances, thats what women get in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:44 AM
2

If women want to live like the royalty of just 30 years ago they will have to work for it. Yep.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:34 AM
5

Of course things like healthcare and education and mortgages are much more expensive, they are also fuckloads better than ever before in the past. Like everything else I just said. Our houses are much nicer and more comfortable, our education is much better, and we live so long compared to the past its mind boggling. Once again, if you want to live in a shack, walk to work, eat homemade soup, handwash your clothes and die at 40, you can do that fine on a single income.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:22 AM
4

A single persons income gives a way wealthier outcome now than it did 100 years ago. People want their 3 bedroom home, the air con, the washing mmachine and dryer, they dont want to walk to work, they want a car, and it has air con and power steering, and they have a smart phone and a laptop and .. etc etc. the list goes on, if you lived like people did 100 or even 50 years ago a single income would be fine. The issue is that people want amazing never before seen living standards and then get ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 07:05 AM
2

We dont need 2 incomes, we want 2 incomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 06:48 AM
3

Because the sexes are different. Why do I want a workshop to put tonnes of performance parts on my car and use various skills, and all they want is money?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 06:47 AM
1

OP you've missed the key point here. While its true that women can get casual sex easily what they want is commitment, and they cannot get that with the hot guy, they can only get sex from him. While its true that you can give commitment to hot girls, you cannot give them sex. Its the exact same problem for both sexes but we have different goals.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 06:30 AM
5

I dont think that anybody said that every single human is identical. Its just that for the most part, men have the best balance of power in relationships with women, in their 30s. Whereas women have it in their early/mid 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:45 AM
25

OP look: its not tha attractiveness peaks, but the male SMV to female SMV ratio peaks in the 30s, so in your 30s more women are available and the man has the greatest power in relationships at that age.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 10:48 AM
1

Men are literally at a greater risk in the scenarios that you suggest. Literally. Not "oh look at me Im a victim", literally at greater risk of being mugged or bashed. I personally dont act intimidated because thats step one to being vicmized. But I know full well that I am at greater risk than you of being assaulted violently.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 07:41 PM
1

As a man, who is in shape young and in other peoples words, 'intimidating', I am intimidated when I am walking alone at night and chance upon a stranger in a parking lot, because finding yourself alone at night and vulnerable is fucking stupid. Fuck women like to pat themselves on the back about how big a victim they are. Guess what? Everyone feels vulnerable sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 09:41 AM
2

RP guys who are doing well in the RP thing have multiple FWB going at any one time. I never needed to tell any, its fairly obvious whats going on, most of the conversation regarding other women was them asking for details and me saying no. I have once or twice felt the need to draw an exceptionally clear line in the sand which was me basically saying, "if you ever show me that you are chasing me for a relationship the only fair thing for both of us is for me to cut you from my life.". It felt li…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 09:30 AM
4

This is some ww2 era russian spec advice. Is this an original quote?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 07:44 AM
1

Also you have to consider whether the person who has the grades or qualification on that resume earned it or if it was given to them through some equality regime.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 11:59 AM
2

For most people this is true. On average, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 04:06 AM
6

Ive disagreed with you in the past but by gosh this comment is right.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 11:04 AM
1

Yeah you have nothing on the average 18 year old dressed up for a night out on the town. Thats just how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 11:01 AM
8

Just basic self protection No shit. Welcome to redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 01:49 AM
2

Women born with vaginas who have regular levels of hormones.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 01:43 AM
0

Its self evident within this context no?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 04:49 AM
3

Prosecution stats back me up. Divorce court stats back me up. I could go on but you get the idea. Subjectively i could just look at human interactions objectively. How do members of the public react to men hitting women? The other way around? Etc etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 03:49 AM
10

And I think that fucking women is good. Checkmate OP
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 03:32 AM
4

Its very clear that women lack agency when compared to men, that's easy to observe. If I observed that and still wanted to protect women then that would be me disagreeing because feels. I didn't say anything about how i feel, I only said that its clearly true, I can objectively view the double standards in male and female agency, doesn't matter how I feel about it, its objectively true.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 03:30 AM
3

Your first sentence is just absolutely false. Full stop. As a dude who can make it with girls who have resting bitchface I know you are just wrong. This is why men should ask men for dating advice
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 03:05 AM
1

You are silly if you think that huge corporations would be any more powerful than govt
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 02:33 AM
6

Your assertions are clearly correct but because of the gynocentric reality of life many will disagree because feelz.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 02:32 AM
5

The girl I'm seeing right now literally sent me "help, creeps, Lol" text last night, she went out to see a band with a mate of mine. The dudes are hitting on her and she isn't into them. I hit on her in totally blunt 'sexist' ways and now ages my gf. Its definitely an 'into him vs not into him' issue
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 12:39 AM
1

Your point about Hitler and Stalin, once again, that's men doing more things. Men also have more testosterone but an enormous margin and testosterone inhibits adversity to risk, again a male trait which leads to more violence. Men do sports because its in line with their physical, teamwork oriented competitive nature . women nurture more because that's inline with their nature. I would never claim that men do more in terms of producing raising and nurturing children because that's literally wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 11:08 PM
1

The state is a mafia. Its not freedom at all, as I said, it only appears like freedom to those that like alcohol and mafia style protection Rackets, doesn't look anything like freedom to people who like marijuana and private security, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 11:04 PM
2

Even more awkward girls. But they'd prefer. Secure outgoing guy as long as those properties don't intimidate her.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 11:03 AM
3

Onus for what? Googleing something? I ain't plying that game. Cya
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 07:51 AM
2

Google some stats. Exactly like men get it worse in the west. Huge workload, short lives, poor health, huge stress, more assault, more murder, high suicide. Etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 07:31 AM
2

Right. Not on topic.. You realise that men get it worse in those societies right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 07:25 AM
2

Just did i said that regardless of if your point is even true women will do less anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 07:19 AM
2

Women have always done less and still do in all societies. Respond.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 07:05 AM
2

Women do, because women dont want to do as much as producing and protecting as men want to do. Women are reminded every months for 30 years straight that their job is to raise children, mens job is to provide for them and protect them. This is straight forward biological shit thats undeniable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 06:39 AM
3

Men do more of everything than womem by a wide wide margin. They save more lives, play more sport, make more money, work more hours, kill more people, eat more food, run more companies, just over and over again men do more of everything. Men do the vast majority of what gets done on this little planet, so its no surprise that men instigate more violence, because women dont do much of ~anything~ including violence when compared directly to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 06:28 AM
2

So all of the sexist women who clearly dont want men and women to be equal somehow count as feminists despite the definition for feminists being the same as the definition for equalists?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 06:13 AM
2

In that case 'real feminists' are a dying breed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 06:08 AM
3

Im a libertarian, I want less govt and rules not more. Soo nah. For you the acceptance of might=right sucks, but thats reality, might really does equal right. There is no getting around that, its just that in our society the might is govt, and you personally dont mind sucking the long dick of the law and doing what the men in power want. You forget all of the violence that is aimed at people who want to be free. What Im saying is that while your life is free from violence and oppression its only…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 06:04 AM
2

It's about choice and rights, not judgement and superiority. In theory Id agree with you, in reality you're simply wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 05:50 AM
1

feigning arrogance in order to insight the mob for their own personal gain Such a common tactic. Ive been known to tell people that they are 'either being intellectually dishonest or a fucking tool' on PPD before.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 05:44 AM
2

He said he knows what they want, and that what they want is what they pursue (obviously, we can observe what women pursue) and that what they want and what they say they want are not consistant.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 05:21 AM
5

I know what women pursue, what they say they want and what they actually pursue is where the idea that women dont know what they want come from.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 05:18 AM
5

Im saying that you have it back to front, Im saying that the reason men dont control everything is that they already did the work required to allow women to play a bit. Im saying that when life is fucked men step in and do all of the work they can to get it good again, and now that men have gotten the west to this nice place where its easy and safe we can afford to allow women to do the serious jobs because they want to. We even have laws to make sure women get to play even if they arent the bes…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 05:05 AM
7

it is coming into fruition and I personally would argue that these societies are freer, safer, more fun, more enjoyable, and with a higher standard of living and higher happiness than we've ever had. No shit, modern western rich as fuck society has a higher standard of living than societies in the past? One might argue that we are so wealthy and have it so easy that all we have left to work on is BS like mansplaining, man spreading, not enough sensitivity in boys, etc We got to this stage becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 12:44 AM
1

I didnt know that and it surprises me, lets lower the tone and discuss it. Do you have a theory?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 09:55 AM
1

I meant lower suicide rates, its a typo, relax. Also, I wonder if the female ratio of attempts to success and male attempts to success ratios (and female to male ratios) are the same worldwide, Id be amazed if they werent. Money is literally more valuable to men, for reasons which are hardwired. Happy to explain if you didnt know and want to understand why Id say this.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/15 09:19 AM
1

Being less risk averse than their male counterparts, higher suicide rates, taller bellcurve in results ranging from intellect to height compared to equivalent men, lower income compared to similar men due to less hours worked and what appears to be less ambition to earn money. I could go on.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 10:00 PM
10

Their problems are caused by biology, this includes individual mens attitudes and actions, and other mens propensity to help them, which is much lower than their efforts to help women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 01:34 AM
3

Do you honestly know what quotas are in place on the journey to your job position. I have a friend who I consider not especially clever, who is studying engineering and she basically walked into a job with Tesla, i asked her about quotas and she said "Nah I doubt it" and then moved right on from that. Basically she didnt want to know or think about it. I bet this is prevalent in people who have been given an unfair advantage through quotas, I know I sure wouldnt want to know that I actually didn…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 01:25 AM
15

Its widely accepted at RP that men are risk takers and that the bell curve for men is much wider than for women, in terms of basically every measurable aspect. So yeah its not spoken about because its so damned obvious. Thats my take.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 01:17 AM
1

You misunderstand the concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 01:12 AM
1

OP, You are right but we believe that a person doesnt ever get over the level of person they once had. So while they may be emotionally past the relationship they had they arent over the fact that they had a high level person once but no more.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/15 01:12 AM
1

Im getting mad pussy and the girls love me back, so basically I couldnt care less.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 09:45 AM
1

I posted this elsewhere but the guy who prefer it are like: "I swear having some dick missing is great, look at all you whole dick losers Lol.." I don't buy it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 09:39 PM
1

Does she peg you too?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 02:42 PM
0

Sounds like he is projecting: "nah guys circumcision is good, you all wish you had some of your dick cut off losers.."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 02:41 PM
1

They are clearly both genital mutilation by definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 02:39 PM
5

People don't need the law or the government Libertarian here. You're preaching to the choir. What you dont understand is that you, me, your mates, and the public in general have no say whatsoever about how the world goes around or what rules it has, voting is the slaves suggestion box. Next.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 02:30 PM
6

Women don't cheat on their provider husbands with better providers. Boom.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 02:28 PM
3

I wonder why jay leno keeps buying cool new cars then.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 01:40 PM
3

"I can see this table of excellent food is free and the waiter will offer me some any minute, but because its free and on offer I cant be bothered to reach out and take the one piece of cake I really want"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 01:32 PM
3

You are saying that a man good enough to be so high status that women flock to him, doesnt have motivation?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 01:20 PM
4

You are saying that a man who wants a chick and who knows he can have her will just hope that she gives herself to him. Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 01:10 PM
2

And then the droves of 2nd world nations take over. Which is fine really, Im a libertarian, it sucks for me but its really not immoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 12:51 PM
8

A mans job is to make shit happen. His status is directly linked to how proficient he is at making what he wants happen at his will. Period.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 12:45 PM
6

You are trying to claim that men and women are identical when we both know that isnt true.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 12:42 PM
1

Its always occurred to me that women want to be as good as men at all of these tasks which are building societies physical needs, despite possessing the greatest most important society building skill of all. Women are inherently exceptionally valuable and irreplaceable because they can give birth to our population.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 12:37 PM
5

Its not less shitty, its just different. Again, the women are wonderful effect is at full effect here. Women misusing power is seen as somehow morally above men misusing their power.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 12:37 PM
1

I've seen 15 or so erect cocks as an adult and only have I seen one a similar size. I get told this a lot too but I do wonder how truthful it always is
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 04:33 AM
1

I understand how that translates on reddit and makes other people think that 'of course' is sexy and suave. /sarcasm
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 10:31 PM
5

I never said that woman want compliments on their looks and I dont think the majorit or TRP is suggesting that, what they are suggesting is a phenomenon that men as a whole are familiar with and that is discussed on PPD regularly. That is that women receive benevolent sexism as standard, and any deviation from that including fair and equal treatment appears as mistreatment. And I stand by this.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 10:31 AM
1

K
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 05:36 AM
6

Frankly, you are complaining about getting worse treatment than you are used to. Red pill is all about treating women equally rather than pedastalising. Can you do the maths here or what?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 02:55 AM
4

Umm. I said that I wasn't fighting feminism. Read before you type.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 02:37 AM
3

Not sure who 'you guys' are. How is saying of course you can sit on my lap suave? Her: Can I sit on your lap? Him: Of course. OMG so suave!!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 01:14 AM
2

" It must be easier swallowing the education system since the entire ideology is a coping mechanism to deal with your failures at life (many of it caused by society)" Do you see what I did there.. I did what you did and called any self improvement a 'coping mechanism'.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 01:14 AM
0

That is sexy. Wow. When someone says of course you can sit on my lap lolol. You guys are so cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 10:57 PM
5

Feminism isn't doing shit, the political and business elites run this planet and they choose who does what and whats ok. I cant do anything about it and neither can you. Im happy fucking a few hot girls at once and having my phone blow up every weekend.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 10:38 PM
2

I feel like you are ignoring some of what I am saying to help your argument and acting naive on purpose. Like, how does the word breadwinner have anything to do with 'winning' as charlie sheen would use it?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 08:53 AM
3

Its not cherry picking, I literally cant find a study that blankly says that a large percentage of wives earnmore than men. The studies I could find showed that 25-30% of full time working women earned more than their full time earning men. So what percentage of total wives earn significantly more than their partners? 2%? 4%? I dont know but its not 'heaps'. Its a small fraction. And its not cherry picking to say that 2 people who earn within 5 or 10% of each other that it doesnt count, The idea…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 03:27 AM
6

Im finding stats that show <30% of marriages where both couples earn income the woman earns more. So youd have to find out what percentage of married couples both are currently working and divide that by avout 3 to find what percentage of women earn more. one top of that youd need to control for incomes where the income is pretty much the same, if the man earns 60k and the woman earns 64k its not really what we are discussing here. Basically in my experience its exceptionally rare and I cant fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 01:39 AM
10

There are an extremely small percentage of women who are married to men who earn less. You know this, I know this, you know that I know this.. come on. Stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 01:11 AM
1

Depends if he means actual liberal (classic) or 'modern liberal' which is the opposite almost.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/15 01:01 AM
1

Only read the title. Obviously ..
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 01:13 PM
2

I never ever said you were redpill, I only said that the post I was replying to was saying something that RP says
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 09:13 AM
9

Yeap, tonnes of mental and physical abuse and enourmous divorce rates combined with mental issues, this sounds like an attack but the stats dont lie, lots of depression, anxiety and domestic violence, along with the shortest expected lives of all relationships combinations. When women are the vastly greater initiators of divorce and DV in mixed sex relationships you can guess how it goes when you put 2 together.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 11:58 PM
2

Thats literally what RP teaches. Well done, you are now one of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 11:52 PM
1

It goes both ways, your instincts are correct. Women however employ dread through virtue of having a vagina and the state to back it up, so men should at the very least understand how it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 01:17 PM
4

You are trolling. Pls stop. its useful knowledge if you are a man raised by women, which is a huge percentage of western men. So.. just stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 01:12 PM
2

You have full reproductive rights, we have a method with alarmingly high failure rates. That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 12:50 AM
2

See you are trolling. Stop. Just stop you aren't foolig anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/15 12:49 AM
2

Get fucked. Honest to god, you useless idiot. Read everything else thats been posted. Every single post you make reeks of naivety and ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 09:37 PM
1

It depends whos study you read but regardless, in the real world where you and I live pregnancy rates for condoms are alarming.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 09:35 PM
1

Its absolutely a dual choice if someone doesnt use them. Thats serious responsibility shifting. Its a sack of rubber, if its not on its not in is a basic rule thats works for both sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 09:34 PM
3

You're a troll or stupid. Im done with you, period.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 12:30 PM
5

Condoms have a similar pregnancy rate to the pull out method.. its pathetic, and yes Im serious google it. But we are discussing right now, and right now women hold all of the cards.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 08:42 AM
10

The women get to make the choice. Only a woman could be so blind as to the inequality of reproductive rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 05:29 AM
10

You're missing the point. Women get to choose whether they give birth. The men on the other hand do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 05:28 AM
2

Well many women would claim that that is sexist harassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 05:27 AM
1

A girl hollering "Hey Sexy" at a football player jogging by and him simply smiling and blinking at her DOES NOT count as sexual harassment. Dont we want equality these days?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 03:17 AM
13

You have to be joking, pregnancy, and children are scarier for men than for women because WE DONT HAVE ANY RIGHTS. Only a woman could miss the forest for the trees on this one. As for std risk, sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 03:03 AM
4

I'm not willing to sleep with women who were born men. But they are happy to sleep with me despite me being born a man! I'm a horrible mysoginist hypocrite
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 12:38 AM
-3

Bom bom. Wrong. The day that women stop shit testing us is the day that we will take a no at face value.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 12:34 AM
1

I've never had trouble with women, but when I got out of a 6 year relationship I decided to brush up on my skills and theory and 6 months later I'm in shape again, happy, focused, and I have 3 women pining after me for relationships and some fuck buddies on the side, from a mans perspective this is sexual success. Its at the point where my success is causing moral dilemmas. Works for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 12:31 AM
1

Naivety the post Why the hell would someone be proud that they were so bad at gaining female attraction that they became proud of being desensitised to it?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 12:22 AM
1

You know full well that you will never accept any level of proof that can be given. You are intentionally setting people up to tell them this because it makes you feel superior or something. Fuck off. What's the point. something about your ego
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 02:57 AM
0

Don't we agree with each other?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 02:55 AM
3

I think she is saying that she is selfish with her political views and is ok with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 09:37 PM
8

Congrats that it was all so obvious to you, I bet there is a bunch of things that you misunderstand that othersa find obvious. I hope they are condescending pricks to you when you admit to those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 09:36 PM
2

If you want to be like that why waste his time. You know full well he cant. Why waste your own time? Get a job or something, do something oproducted. Here all you are doing is trying to bait someone into a corner where the end game is just you saying "Naaaaah, your evidence isnt good enough for meeee". Congrats, I can do that too, everyone here can do that but what is the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 09:27 PM
1

Yep agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 09:25 PM
2

Thats quite a lack of empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 09:24 PM
0

If men want the same they need to do the same groundwork. Men dont want the same thing, they are too busy working on womens stuff, donating to womens stuff, voting for womens stuff, paying taxes for womens stuff. Female issues get attention and people draw attention to female issues for the same reason, its built into us. Both men and women are affected by the women are wonderful effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 09:23 PM
1

Welcome to redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 09:21 PM
2

Sounds like he is off the market, its not really the same. If I get a crush on a married chick at work I havnt been friendzoned, i have a crush.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 02:43 PM
1

By far the most common responses I get from BP is them putting words in my mouth. usually this is turning a "most" or "many" into 'all". Just like the above. the person who she replied to said what i also said, that platezoning is the female equivalent to friendzoning. And i dont think anyone here in this thread asserted that women cant be friendzoned. RP as a whole has a solid agreement with each other which circumstances that men and women can be friends are, we know that the VASt majority of …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 02:37 PM
1

We agree with each other, why you would spend 20 posts pointing it out I dont know. women basically do fuck all. Thats the reality of life on earth. The problem is mens problem primarily caused by men. There isnt anything that can be done except show people that they have a bias rather than leave them naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 02:34 PM
2

You know full well all he can do is say that his worldview constantly proves it, as does the rest of the guys he talks to. you know thats all he can do and you know you will just keep saying 'but thats not good enough for me'. So stop doing it, what is the point if you arent willing to consider that he may be right and you wont accept all of the evidence that is possible to collect then why are you in the debate sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 02:31 PM
1

But she is talking to me and I never said that so... stop doing that shit pls.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 02:28 PM
1

It seems like people in this thread are trying to blame women Youre projecting. people arent doing that and Im certainly not either. Let me put on my RP hat and say it bluntly : Almost everything on the planet is done by men. Probably this too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 02:27 PM
2

You know full well he cant bring studies to the table. So are you just attacking for the fun of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 02:26 PM
2

My question again, is: what else could he provide for you that he hasnt?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 02:22 PM
2

Let me show you what I am sick of from BP posters here. I said: because guys -usually- just want to fuck them. And then: So the friendzone is -only- about sex? If a guy wants an LTR with a girl and she says "No, let's just be friends," that's not friendzoning? So basically, stop doing this shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 02:18 PM
1

Sure, and i appreciate your thoughts. I need to think on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:55 PM
1

I believe you are trolling, OR too stupid to debate with.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:55 PM
0

I think you are missing the point which is that both men and women care more about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:54 PM
1

So the uestion essentially is "Does this feel like being friendzoned if you are the girl in this situation?"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:37 PM
1

Read my other reply to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:36 PM
3

Im not continuing this you are either dense or trying to prove a point that everyone already understands inherently.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:36 PM
3

Its not really the same because what women and men want from the opposite sex TYPICALLY is not the same. you liek him but what is it that you want, his intimacy and committment or just to fuck him? because guys usually just want to fuck them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:27 PM
2

Its not disgusting, its reality, dont hate the rules or the game just play it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:23 PM
2

You are arguing for the sake of it, you know what i am saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:22 PM
1

if I told you that she knew all of my requirements and simply says that she cant? She doesnt have the self confidence and gets anxious. Nothing I can do to solve that for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:22 PM
1

Yeah thats a more eloquent way of saying what I said. I truly do believe this. Ive been on both ends of this AND the friendzoned end.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:14 PM
1

Lots of people suggesting to go exclusive with her. It would be a shame to miss out thats true.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:11 PM
1

She wants an LTR out of me, Im not sure that she was hunting for one when we met.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:01 PM
0

My point is that breast cancer kills more (than prostate) In your country. Why are you saying that some dude should do something re: prostate cancer, and why is it only about cancer, there are many and varied places where men are the primary victim yet women get the primary care and support. Thats all. I didnt blame women for it. I believe that its built into us as a society and a species. Im just making the point that its true.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 01:01 PM
2

No one here has suggested that they dont, I sure havnt, its just not common.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:59 PM
1

In my experience they would like commitment in approx all cases EXCEPT one night stands. Having said that I would bet my left nut that almost all of those girls already have an alpha they want to get commited and the ONS is in addition to that not instead of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:47 PM
1

Assuming that she doesnt enjoy my company than yes she is wasting her time. And as I said wont I just end up in the same position again?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:46 PM
2

Thats why its being referred to as the female equivalent. For men its common to be friendzoned, for women its common to be platezoned. Men and women are the same yet opposite, just like friendzoning and platezoning. Equivalent, not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:45 PM
3

One might say the same thing about friendzoned guys but that simply isnt always the case. these women know full well my intentions and my RP worldviews though so it isnt as if they arent educated about it. The issue is if they cant resist what they see in me (what RP would call my value) despite it hurting that they cant have me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:40 PM
1

Actually shes a close to perfect RPW by their definition. 3 partners total, very domestic, grooms me because she feels like it, feels bad if she watches me fold clothes. etc etc She is really excellent but I have some requirements that I know long term I have to have and so I know there is no point trying and just waiting for the inevitable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:33 PM
1

Thats why people here have refferred to it as being platezoned.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:31 PM
1

Depends how you define FWB.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:30 PM
1

You are assuming that all I want from her is sex, and so I should be kind to her and replace her with someone else who will sex me, but I thought I was pretty clear than I really like her, she just isnt up to scratch for an LTR based on my standards. If i dropped her and moved onto another I wouldnt get my intimacy needs covered OR if I had a connection with the next girl, it would just be this all over again.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:28 PM
1

Regarding girl 2 and talking about girl one with her, your perspective is that its likely that she really doesnt have feelings, and that if I asked her outright that she would likely be honest. Thats my interpretation of what you wrote correct me if Im wrong.. So with that in mind do you believe that all of your guy friends honestly dont want to fuck you? As for the top girl, well basically why would I go exclusive when I already get everything I would ever want out of my relatrionship with her …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:26 PM
1

She has told me outright that she has no feelings for me though, are you saying that she is a liar? So the premise of the OP question is basically "dont all girls who are fucking a guy exclusively probably have feelings for him?". You appear to agree with that, or am I misundersdtanding you?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:23 PM
1

She is 24 and still lives with her parents and only works very little, and she is not very outgoing, where as I am extraordinarily spontaneous and outgoing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:20 PM
1

Yeah, but I think you and I define plate differently. I have people I only fuck, who have no ranking. And I have friends who are female that i am not platonic with. Those people I am able to rank, because we have different levels of connection. If i were just fucking them they wouldnt have an emotional connection, this is true for girl 3 and 4.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:19 PM
1

The phenomenon is not only true in america, its true in other western countries, cancelling your point about local attention raising. But again you are proving my point, you are right that men arent advocating mens health, they are advocating and donating to womens health.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:16 PM
3

Because its worth it to me. I can be satisfied by fuxjing new and different women. The issue as I said is with the person who tries to lock me down.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 06:02 AM
6

Yeah that's the complicated part, and the need for this thread
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 06:01 AM
6

Exactly. So spinning plates is like the friendzone. Kind of sucks for the girls really. Im sure I bring positivity to both of them, im sure they are happier with me in their lives I treat them very well, they just dont get exclusive rights like they want. Its a complicated arrangement isnt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 05:05 AM
1

If you tell people to 'man the fuck up' and 'work through the pain', you end up with an epidemic of male suicides NOT because all the evil estrogen is hogging the resources and attention I KNOW THIS IS WHAT IM SAYING. Holy shit. This is the point, we have a society which is geared towards ignoring mens problems. That is not a situation women in general caused. I know, and I never said that. Holy shit. Listen to my words not what you think im saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 05:03 AM
1

You are proving my point. We have a society that as a whole cares about solving women's problems despite not being the primary victim in so many cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 04:15 AM
3

Did you miss the point I was making or are you debating for fun? the point is that there is not nearly the support for men, in any circumstance. Whether its male specific cancer, mental health, or homelessness, suicide, workplace safety, the list goes on. Despite men being the primary victims in these circumstances more time and money and media support is given to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 03:54 AM
1

She knows this stuff full well. She sleeps with me because I am high value to her especially in relation to her past partners and she knows that also. I have no relationship feelings for her but I care about her wellbeing as much as if she were a dude I was close with. Long story short you are saying that I have an internal moral dilemma, and THAT is my problem. Which of course I agree with, hence the need for a PPD thread about it. Now she knows full well what the rules are and she knows how re…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 03:52 AM
1

I absolutely agree and understand, so basically you agree with the premise of my OP, that infact this is equivalent. Basically this question is answered in your opinion with "yes its cruel to her to bring attention to her situation", and you add the proviso of "however its not your problem". Remember all that red pill shit about how men and women can't be friends? This is another twist on it. yeah this is the other side of the coin, this is the female equivalent of friendzoning. Just as a male o…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 03:35 AM
1

I dont love her, am not in love with her, and dont want a relationship with her, period. But I have no reason to be a prick to her. If she was a guy friend I wouldnt bring up topics that would upset them if it didnt have a benefit somewhere else, which this doesnt. What have i got wrong here, in your opinion? EDIT: there is no exclusive, she knows she would be dropped from my life if she brought it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 03:21 AM
6

Absolutely. Redpill understanmds amnd agrees that high partner counts affect pair bonding for both menand women, however they believe that it affects women more, because of oxytocin and testosterone, which makes sense medically speaking and backs up most of our life experiences. We understand that it affects us too, but thats our future LTR's problem, not ours. And its up to her to decide if I am worth it. Just as its up to me to decide if she is worth it if she has a high N count.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 03:16 AM
7

Right and I agree, but you are acting like he is withholding information or something from you. What more do you want from him that he could possibly give?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 03:15 AM
1

So you basically agree with the premise of my question. I care because she is genuinely a friend, and id only be venting anyway which is a bitch move regardless of whether I cared about her feelings or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 03:14 AM
1

She is currently unable to bring it to the table. She brings everything that she possibly can, she is a gorgeous sweet generous affectionate person, a real genuine cutie pie who treats me how I want to be treated, but her life position, where she is at with personal development isnt up to my standards. EDIT: yes if a guy were in the same situation he would see it as fuck buddies. Which she claims to see it is, but I bet she feels platezoned, which is the premise of this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 03:13 AM
2

Factually inaccurate? please tell me about all of the shelters for homeless men. Go ahead, im listening.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 03:11 AM
8

Pretty sure he said its about acquiring friends in the right places and OBVIOUSLY using sexuality is an obvious and easy way to do it if you are an average 22 year old chick. If your argument is that young women cant and dont use sex appeal to their advantage then i will start claiming that young men dont use their fitness and strength to their advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 03:10 AM
5

Redpill agrees with this fully. Redpill acknowledges that completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 03:07 AM
9

He told you full well that his worldview has been shaped by his experiences and gave examples of them, what more could you possibly want from him?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 03:05 AM
2

All of my plates know the deal fully, and its never been kept from any of them, including my standards for LTR. You are saying that no one wants to be platezoned, but the vast majority of guys would love it, hence my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 03:00 AM
5

people are jelly as fuck, so they should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/15 11:27 AM
8

That was a relevant and coherent response.. You serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 11:40 PM
0

You just keep on biting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 11:23 PM
4

I didnt say only doing something nice, I said he be being nicer than if she was a guy. Blue pill continually put words in my mouth. It would be safe for her to assume she is getting treated better than if she was ahe
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 09:56 AM
7

Is he straight? Does she have a bmi less than 22? Is she disfigured? If not for all of the above its a 95% chance he's being nicer than he would if she were a guy. We have talked about this before but women who aren't receiving positive sexism feel as though they are being mistreated (Ie lack of extra niceness they are used to feels like mean ness)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 09:02 AM
1

Ask a Muslim woman, she will tell you that her burka allows her to be treated based on her merit not her looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 08:28 AM
2

I doubt that terpers spinning plates are relieving themselves sexually more than beta blue pills who are friend zoned but one group is wanking and another is fucking hot ties. Claiming that terpers are sex obsessed is like if one day you found gemstones in your yard and when your friends saw all the time you spent talking to jewellers claiming that you were money obsessed. Its the sane amount of sexual tension release but we put the effort into women because when we do its good value compared to…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 08:26 AM
0

Well you are not sharp are you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 05:04 AM
0

By blunt I meant daft, proven by you not realizing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 03:59 AM
8

Lol, she was flirting with you. " 'Course you can as long as she is hot ". EDIT: everyone beat me to it.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/15 11:54 PM
9

No where better to post it but.. Its ok, to suggest that female spiders are bigger, more powerful, do what they want, bosses of the spider world and that the males are pathetic in comparison, the same goes for so many species, but god dam if you suggest that women and men arent fundamentally identical..
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 11:33 PM
2

You sound like my best friend: " I got this cute girls number but I -want- to send her a lame beta text message, and it would be fake of me to act like a boss". Ok faggot, stay dry. Seriously if you want it try it and find out.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 11:30 PM
0

We are talking about the instincts that influence us. You are either trying to argue for the fun of it, trolling me, or very blunt. Im done.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 11:16 PM
1

I like some plates, some arent hot enough to get my commitment period, others dont make the cut because of personal development issues, I hope they can develop for themselves and that would be great for me too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 12:01 PM
-1

I wouldnt say it to many people in real life, but almost EVERYTHING is caused by men. Including male oppression.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 11:58 AM
4

Pls cite.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 11:50 AM
0

Yeah i agree with that, it doesnt change anything about what i said.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 04:36 AM
3

What differences do you see in the attitudes, direction, and efforts of women now compared to the 50's?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 06:00 AM
1

You are literally debating the animal instinct for a high quality partner to breed with by stating: "But this noble family once didnt do so great". Good effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 05:59 AM
5

The things western women are becoming more like.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 04:47 AM
1

One anecdotal example. I'm convinced.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 04:44 AM
11

The direction that western women have moved in the past 3 decades. Masculinity lies in that direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 11:40 PM
2

Your friend is at 2. It seems that while you are attracted to him, his qualities and game arent getting him maaaad pussy at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 11:28 PM
1

Pretty sure if you lined up 150 hot willing women in a mansion for a week and there werre no consequences every guy I know would try. Every single guy I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 08:41 PM
3

Like, 150 women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 08:18 PM
7

I never said that it was. Fuck me you bluepillers put words in peoples mouth absolutely non stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 12:15 AM
1

'survivor of virtual.." Are you listening to yourself? Am I being trolled? Someone played a game and someone trolled them with animations and over voice, is that what the issue is?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 11:58 PM
5

How?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 11:57 PM
9

You're an idiot. I do kind courteous things for the women in my life all the time, and I look alright with my shirt off, and I get laid. Some of the kind courteous stuff is calculated, manipulative, and well thought out. And they love it, why wouldnt they?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 11:42 PM
1

This is a joke. I mean, its a joke. Its wow. Go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 11:38 PM
1

Shit no.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 06:29 AM
1

Craving the best quality partner to have children with isnt instinct? Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/15 02:18 AM
1

And culture affects that. Do you think women in Iran could act on hypergamous instincts?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 10:20 AM
1

It makes her more powerful. Its a story technique. As I said women like it when it happens to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 10:19 AM
4

They want them to in that it empowers the woman, but it makes her less attracted to him. RP could care less what women want, it cares what makes women attracted to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 01:13 AM
1

The pretext of all PPD discussions is western americanised culture in the present unless otherwise expressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 01:00 AM
3

people who have 'successfully completed the program' probably arent in there much. I follow RP principles, read the texts, discuss it on PPD, but BPers spend more time in TRP than I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 01:56 AM
1

I completely agree with that, see my post history. Where genders differ is still part of awalt, and the gender differences are what is specifically RP. "Humans are shitty, be careful" is info available everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 10:21 PM
1

Its sexual strategy. Its what you said it is AND what I said it is and if you find another use for it, its that too. Regardless my anecdote about tonnes of sex with different female friends is true, and I'm RP. And I'm happy to say RP works for me
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 04:41 PM
1

Its a sexual strategy for men who want better relationships. I had slept with >20 women when discovered red pill. I just came out of a long relationship, I met a gorgeous girl and got her number, met her in town and blew it. I hit the internet to figure out why and get my game back on track and found it. Previously I had only seen PUA stuff online which for me wasn't really applicable to real life. Do you think football play strategy is for people who can't play football only?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 04:26 PM
2

My point is that I know you are wrong because of my own personal life How does that not help the point? I'm RP. My sex life is great. My relationsgips with women are very successful by most men's standards. It goes directly against your point that everyone RP is useless with women and that you should therefore dismiss everything they say about relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 04:19 PM
1

So I should pretend I'm doing worse in my personal life to make it believable?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 04:15 PM
5

You are strawmanning or you dont understand. Its not that every woman is exactly the same its that the vast majority are and the best way to approach a person that fits into a category is with what you know about most people in that category. If I got to china and approach a chinaman on a rice paddy Im not going to try and start a conversation with him in german, because I know that in general chinamen on rice paddies speak cantonese. Also, you say that the person is sexually frustrated because …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 06:04 AM
1

I said this before, the difference between being controlling and having self respect is meaning what you say. Its the difference between : "If you do this stuff I will not like it and I will treat you bad and hope you learn". And: "I only spend time with people who treat me/behave like this, period." One is a person who wants to push and pull and control, and the other is a person saying, I have these standards for how nice I need to be treated and in return I will treat you just as nice, step u…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 05:57 AM
11

RP would say "I told you so". I told you so.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 05:40 AM
2

My experience is that the majority who do these things wouldnt be doing it if they felt they had a more viable choice. Im done here, I dont know how many times I have to repeat myself and point out that you are putting words into my mouth. Good bye.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 03:52 AM
1

What I said has to do with what the majority of men are into. News at 11, water is wet, and men and women are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 03:50 AM
2

I never said anything like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 03:44 AM
2

I accept that people have kinks, I do not accept that the majority of people who appear to have this kink would if they didnt feel that they had to.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 03:39 AM
1

Ive swung as a couple too, I wasnt suggesting that guys arent turned on by watching their partner get fucked. On equal terms its always been fine when Ive experienced it or seen it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 03:30 AM
2

I think they are experiencing sex thats better and more interesting than they would be able to get otherwise. I think its a strategy to avoid complete failure, not a strategy for ultimate sexual success and fulfillment.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 02:57 AM
2

Do they? Look, my experience has been that sub guys are not chad thundercocks. My experience is also that cuck guys are married men whos wives dont want to fuck them. Draw from that what conclusions you want to, knowing these people in real life has led me to feel fairly sure of what most would consider to be the obvious conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 02:44 AM
2

I think the sub is into it because it is sex they otherwise wouldnt be able to get. Ive not met a sub male who I thought would have no trouble getting pussy in a regular way, they have all been undesirable as far as their SMV goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 02:40 AM
2

The wives did. The wives also usually try to fuck me behind his back. He is only there because thats a way she can fuck other hotter guys, the preference is to fuck hot guys on the side, not put on an act and pretend its because he wants to play cuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 02:34 AM
2

Again what i am telling you is just my experience, but Ive seen both sides of the coin in these relationships and there is no way I could agree with you based on what I have seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 02:30 AM
2

I used to be part of the swinging community, and have fucked my share of women infront of their husbands, Ive also had intimate conversations with the women in private about their relationships. Edit: Ive also spoken to the men in front of their wives (at bars, coffee shops etc) and I can spot someone supplicating when I see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 02:03 AM
2

No it means that 30% either like the sub role, or an equal role or dont mind. And again Ill suggest that the guys in the BDSM workd are there because they get a bunch of sex, and those men couldnt get a bunch of sex otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 01:40 AM
3

ok ill bite. Citation please.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 01:26 AM
2

I think that a few guys like it. Id be amazed if the guys who were into it were alpha males who got a bunch of pussy. The guys who are often acting in femdon (who appear to be in it because they liek it) always appear to be pathetic losers to me. They seem to be the same subset of guys whos wives I have fucked in front of them. nI think its the same as guys who are chubby chasers, its not that they really like chubby chicks but its a 'realistic fantasy'. Like they are into chubby chicks because …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 12:57 AM
7

Yeah the dude is 11/10 alphamale who can have anyone and he chooses her. Let me quote myself: "more than she deserves." Also Im quoting myself (something I have verbalized, not typed in this thread) An alpha female is a female who can LTR an alpha male who acts towards her like he is a beta male.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 12:51 AM
3

As a guy who has been a bull a few times, I can tell you that the husbands are into it because its the hottest thing that they will get, not because they are into it. Additionally the men havnt ever been the ones who suggested it, its always the bored wife pushing for it. People who watch cuckold porn are imagining themselves as the bull not the cuck in the VAST majority of the cases. Its a fantasy where the bull completely dominates both a women who loves it, and a man who doesnt get a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 12:50 AM
18

Its not about healing him for him, its about making him beta enough that he respects her more than she deserves. Go read one, its so cringeworthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 12:46 AM
1

TL;DR OP thinks that the extra men not getting laid will help the population increase because they want to give away their resources to other guys kids. IE: OP thinks that guys who arent getting any volunteer to be cucks just for the good of human population growth.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 12:42 AM
2

Your post suggests that extra men will increase the provisions to the children. You are suggesting that men would volunteer to be cuckolds if the govt didnt force them. Are you serious? The men not getting pussy are going to fight for their food and other resources just to give them to women who wont fuck them to provide for other guys kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 12:40 AM
21

And they are insulting him for posting that he will definitely wear protection. Fucking pathetic. Im glad I live my life and not theirs, some sad people when a past time is insulting young men who want to learn how to make women enjoy them and wear protection while doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 12:35 AM
1

I have been on a first date where the girl picked me up, drove me, paid, wouldnt let me pay, and at the end of the night gave me an hour long massage. She is my number one gal, as you can imagine. It exists, and she is a gorgeous person, however its not common at all and its safest to assume this isnt going to be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 12:05 AM
1

Like 'lbspredh' said, this is a good description of humans, so yeah, women too.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 11:50 PM
1

When person A shames person B, its because person A wants to change person B's behaviour to benefit person A. Shaming sluts is TYPICALLY done by women because giving away pussy lowers the value of pussy. Basically sluts are undercutting the price other women put on their pussy. Men sometimes use the word slut or skank or similar as an insult to women who sleep around with low standards, because a woman who will sleep with any guy, is biologically making horrible self decisions. With the advent o…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 11:45 PM
6

This is my experience. If you treat women the same way you treat men, they genuinely feel wronged. Imagine a womans reaction to having her head punched off for talking shit. The ramifications of this permeate almost every aspect of the gender debate. Couldnt possibly have said it better myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 05:05 AM
5

You are doing it again, That thing where you put words into peoples mouths. No one said that, he just said that in his experience, where he lives and with the people he interacts, he feels its best to default to that stance. He said nothing about you, me, other cultures or anything like what you are suggesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 05:02 AM
4

Because the general feeling he gets is that while some men do it in some circumstances women do it such a vast majority of the time that he defaults to distrust. While men and women both do it, his experience leads him to trust men by default, and distrust women by default.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 04:20 AM
3

Right, that's not equal. That's being treated fairly, taking into account that men and women are different. This has nothing to do with abortion or anything, its a basic fact that women can opt out of parenthood at any time and men never can. If men could opt out at any time it would be equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 04:00 AM
3

Methodius never said that there arent men who do the same. He never said or implied that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 03:57 AM
8

Fucking hell, so much this. Respect is earned not granted, why the fuck does this idea go straight over peoples heads?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 02:38 AM
2

Typically we just get our emotional, affection, intimacy etc needs from multiple women as we pass through each others lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 02:14 AM
3

Getting money, a house, a bodyguard, and unlimited sex in return for babysitting and cleaning one house seems like an alright deal too but I sure as fuck don't want to do it. I'm a regular guy who gets life satisfaction with guy things. Most women seem to get life satisfaction from girl things, and the happiness studies suggest that's absolutely the case. That's why pressuring women to take a male role is a heavy burden.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 11:27 PM
11

"Mom, Next."
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 04:09 AM
5

My plates know what plate means and know that thats what they are. They are fine with it because with TRP they get the best man they can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 04:08 AM
3

Both men and women suck, and TRP discusses how to make best of this situation, and water is wet. More news at 11.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 04:01 AM
14

OP is talking about physical attraction. This is like saying that Men find a wider range of incomes attractive in women. Thats true because the focus is on beauty, where as for women the focus is on status, so of course they will find a wider range of physical looks attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 03:55 AM
1

I know who to ask for a test. But I bet the majority of westerners have never ever had one
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 10:52 PM
2

I thought twice last time. I made the right choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 10:51 PM
1

She can do what she wants I wont boss her around, Im not her mum, and Im not going to tell her Im offended that she is talking in my presence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 08:00 AM
1

How many women have you hit on who said they were taken, and of those, with how many did you treat it like a shit test to find out?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 07:16 AM
1

I wonder how often the average westerner gets tested... Probably the majority of men never get tested and women only during a pap smear, and even then most of the young women I know have never had a pap smear (probably because its awkward as fuck)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 07:15 AM
1

Not for... geez, 4 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 05:57 AM
1

http://s24.postimg.org/5ntra2j4l/11739502_841761602572921_846247035_n.jpg Theres a screenshot. Android so Im on the right. I just scrolled up for 30 seconds and hit the screenshot button. I can do it with other girls too if you want. I feel like you are just mad that RP works, and that people (yes people, not just men) are ok that it works and in happy relationships 'despite it'.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 04:33 AM
1

Going to make an argument or no?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/15 04:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter