TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lumpynose Archive

View 26 posts and 1,088 comments by lumpynose on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
674

Feminism Caused Thislumpynose/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 02:16 AM
200

lumpynose/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/25 04:11 AM
83

Social Issueslumpynose/r/MensRights22/03/23 03:16 AM
79

Social Issueslumpynose/r/MensRights16/12/22 03:05 AM
65

Social Issueslumpynose/r/MensRights11/09/23 04:27 AM
58

social medialumpynose/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/24 08:19 PM
54

Social Issueslumpynose/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:35 AM
45

social medialumpynose/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/25 12:15 AM
44

Hypocrisylumpynose/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 10:50 PM
31

Social Issueslumpynose/r/MensRights13/08/23 01:11 AM
30

Humourlumpynose/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:37 PM
27

Healthlumpynose/r/MensRights09/04/23 06:29 PM
26

Humourlumpynose/r/MensRights26/09/23 04:54 AM
17

Feminism Caused Thislumpynose/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 02:01 AM
17

Feminism Caused Thislumpynose/r/AntiFeminists23/06/22 08:13 AM
15

Social Issueslumpynose/r/MensRights15/07/23 02:24 AM
9

Social Issueslumpynose/r/MensRights18/03/22 08:07 PM
4

Social Issueslumpynose/r/MensRights22/09/21 11:35 PM
3

Discussionlumpynose/r/AntiFeminists05/12/22 07:45 PM
1

Hypocrisylumpynose/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 07:54 PM
1

Red Pill Theorylumpynose/r/TheRedPill01/11/17 11:30 PM
1

Humourlumpynose/r/MensRights03/06/23 08:40 PM
1

Feminism Caused Thislumpynose/r/AntiFeminists03/01/23 02:51 AM
1

Generallumpynose/r/MensRights15/05/22 09:49 PM
0

False Accusationlumpynose/r/MensRights04/04/23 09:29 PM
0

Humourlumpynose/r/MensRights20/05/22 10:40 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,088 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
38

The feminists would tell you that the women who are doing it are being forced to do it by men. 🤷🏽‍♂️ They always have an answer as to why it's men's fault.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/06/26 02:37 AM
21

You'll tell me I'm a masochist but I regularly read the women's subs on reddit (twox, etc.). At first I was puzzled by the stories of some guy getting angry and being an asshole for no reason whatsoever, according to her telling of the story. After a while I realized that they have some magical memory that forgets critical parts of the story; I honestly believe that they don't remember those bits. Then I started reading the WomenInTech sub where a similar thing happens there, some guy gets an ad…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/06/26 02:12 AM
1

Nevertheless my point about males and females having innate core values due to evolution still stands.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/26 12:53 AM
0

Not knowing where this came from I would guess that it was written by a man. It states a sentiment that I largely agree with. But I wouldn't say that they're embarrassed about not being a wife but they feel a compulsion to be a wife and mother, or that being single feels like failure. It's simply a gender specific innate value due to evolution. One of our core values for being a successful man is being a good provider, for women it's being a wife and mother.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/26 12:40 AM
1

If you don't mind me asking, since you say it's unrelated, I'm curious, why don't you read books by female authors? In an economic sense the fantasy genre is overwhelmed with with female authors. I haven't used it in a while but there is a web page ereaderiq.com where they list today's free books from amazon. Probably over 95% of them are female authored. And it's not like they're good authors; they just crank out mediocre stuff so that they can brag that they're a writer. And all too often thei…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/05/26 01:55 AM
4

You're welcome. I read a ton of books, mostly fantasy, via Amazon's Kindle Unlimited. After reading that essay I realized that in the books I'd read with a woman main character that she was rather a dud and uninteresting. Now I investigate and don't read books with a woman main character. I also don't read books by women authors, but for a different reason. Nevertheless in the books by male authors you'll often see the female side characters belittling and making fun of the male main character, …
/r/EverydayMisandry13/05/26 06:20 PM
14

He's not giving his real reason but the politically correct reason. This essay explains why it's not feasible to portray women negatively. https://jackfisherbooks.com/2017/06/29/the-galbrush-paradox-and-the-challenge-of-female-characters/
/r/EverydayMisandry13/05/26 12:13 AM
2

That was the first thing that struck me about this image. Straight guys are undoubtedly enjoying the view and thus unaware of the hypocrisy.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/04/26 04:28 PM
3

It's not entirely about the fertility rate. Back when we were evolving a younger woman was more likely to live long enough to raise the offspring to adulthood. Also she was more likely to survive birthing and miscarriages.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/04/26 04:25 PM
-3

Unfortunately she's largely correct. Mother Nature really did deal women a shitty hand. As a firm believer in evolutionary psychology it gets even worse for them when you look at that. For me their fundamental problem is that instead of trying to understand why, all they do is blame men. They don't want to work with men and understand and try to find solutions, they just want to blame us and expect us to fix problems that we didn't create. Unfortunately reddit doesn't allow a discussion about ev…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/04/26 01:15 AM
3

Yeah, she dropped a 9; it's really 99.5%. /s
/r/EverydayMisandry25/04/26 04:38 PM
41

We could do a Machiavellian thing and start narratives like this that are equally crazy and fill their narratives full of obviously outlandish and crazy ideas. Sort of like the birds aren't real thing. Get them to the point where people start questioning anything they say.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/04/26 09:42 PM
6

She was denied any brains and intelligence. Obviously it's the fault of the patriarchy. Poor thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/04/26 09:16 PM
8

The bears.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/03/26 05:22 PM
2

Nothing he said was incorrect. For her it was pretty much the opposite.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/03/26 03:35 AM
10

Insecure people reflexively tear down others as a compensating behavior.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/03/26 12:20 AM
4

"It’s so common it’s called Alpine Divorce and there are support groups for it." Their hysteria makes me laugh.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/26 08:45 PM
1

I'm amused by yet another woman needing reassurance about something that I would see as self evident. But then I've seen so many posts on twox where the story doesn't make sense until you realize that she's left out some crucial detail; they have amazingly flexible memories.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/26 06:52 PM
1

There's an interesting thread about gay romances written by women here.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/01/26 08:58 PM
4

Apparently anything that has wiki in its name is wikipedia. /s
/r/EverydayMisandry20/01/26 06:54 PM
-16

Another Russian bot post.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/26 07:43 AM
10

They know that whenever a woman does something wrong that it's due to the patriarchy.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/01/26 05:42 PM
19

OP is a female and is surprised to find out that de Beauvoir was a pedo?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/01/26 05:19 PM
15

As always, they think with their emotions, not logic and analysis.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 05:25 PM
15

Therapists are like chiropractors, they don't fix things and keep you coming back, for years.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/25 04:42 PM
32

On the other hand, what about the kid's last name? There was a post in one of the women's subs where she wanted to name her offspring with her last name and not her husband's. All of the responses were of the "do it, smash the patriarchy" flavor. I pointed out that people will assume the kid was born before she married and is a bastard and not something you should saddle your kid with. And of course it was down voted a lot. People should stop trying to be clever with their children's names; they…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/12/25 08:13 PM
60

Do people really think the drug sniffing dogs aren't going to be able to smell it?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/25 08:05 PM
14

Before the feminists redefined the word misogyny to mean hating women and sexism it had meant only hating women. Also at that time the word sexism was never, or at best very rarely, used to describe sexism against men; it was essentially gendered for women. So in that sense I agree with u/gratis_eekhoorn. But I get your point. Feminists are masters at controlling the dialog so I wouldn't get much hope.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/25 05:23 PM
9

They just want them for sex, and to make them a sandwich. /s
/r/EverydayMisandry10/12/25 02:21 AM
16

"It's just a word incels created for comments they didn't like." And incel is just a word that feminists created for men who don't support feminism. Similarly, if you look in an older dictionary, one from the 1960s for example, the definition of misogyny is simply someone who hates women. Nothing about sexism or anything else. Now it's similar to incel, meaning not supporting feminism. I have to give them credit where it's due; they're very successful at being manipulative.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/11/25 08:09 PM
1

Anyone can write an article for Substack. Same as Medium. It's just a more slick version of WordPress.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/25 09:42 AM
10

I read several of the women's/feminist's subs and the hatred of men has really blossomed since Trump was elected. My take is that not voting for Harris and her pro abortion stance is a huge issue for them. Also if you don't 100% support abortion rights. They equate disagreement with them on these issues as a clear and unequivocal sign that you hate women. For them it's absolutely black and white, no nuance whatsoever. No attempt at understanding. As the saying goes, "My way or the highway."
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/25 05:20 PM
56

In the stories on the women's subs (twox, etc.) the women are always the victim, regardless of how obvious it is that she created the problem. At most they excuse their bad behavior by claiming to be on the autism spectrum, adhd, or (my favorite) neurodivergent, etc. Absolutely zero sense of accountability.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/10/25 01:51 AM
4

Stupidity is what happens when you let your emotions rule your thinking.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/10/25 03:05 PM
0

I don't see it as something to do with gay communities but simply that within the gay/homosexual population that bi and gay men vastly outnumber bi and lesbian women. Bi and lesbian women aren't more "hidden" so to speak, there are just much fewer of them.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/10/25 05:08 PM
2

I don't watch youtube videos so I was wondering if the video touches on the Galbrush Paradox where there are so many more things a writer can do with a male character that would be unacceptable with a female character. Another question, which may or may not be relevant, is does the video say anything about a popular genre "boy love" which is gay male romances, written by women for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:03 PM
7

I definitely agree about it being more normalized to derogate gay men versus lesbians. Various things that might be factors. Straight men like porn where it's two women. My observation is that women are much less likely to enjoy porn, therefore probably less likely to enjoy gay porn. On the other hand there's a popular genre of gay male romances that are written by women for women. For men, being gay is often seen as emasculating, whereas lesbians aren't always seen as being butch dykes or defem…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/10/25 04:41 PM
2

In a way it's hardly subtle, although I admit it took me a few minutes to understand what they were implying. And then when I understood it I was having a very hard time believing that they could be that stupid. Although I browse the twox subreddit every day and I see instances of similar stuff every day so I don't know why I was having a hard time believing it.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/09/25 06:02 PM
1

biological truths aren't men's fault. Absolutely. And they deny the biology of evolution.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/09/25 02:50 AM
30

It's from the sub 4bmovement. Not a surprising or unusual post for that sub.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/25 12:35 AM
2

For me the questionable use of female is when it's used as a noun. With that usage it does feel dehumanizing. Either woman or female feels normal as an adjective, and sometimes female feels more natural.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/08/25 03:17 PM
8

Apparently she thinks that guys use the word female to intentionally upset and insult them. Nevertheless it is amusing how so many of them get triggered by that word; there are regularly posts on twox with someone complaining about it.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/08/25 03:14 AM
2

Evolution shaped men's and women's brains. One of the gender specific things for males is finding young attractive females desirable for a mate. Evolution is about ensuring the survival of the offspring, its goal if you will. Back when we were evolving cavemen a young female was more likely to survive birthing, and more likely to live long enough to raise the offspring to adulthood. The complementary flip side of the coin for females is that in order to attract males, and therefore for their gen…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/25 04:37 PM
1

With the bodies evolution gave them women definitely got the dirty side of the lollipop that fell on the ground. I didn't realize how much they suffer from menstrual cramps and how emotional and emotionally fragile they are until I started browsing the twox sub. But as long as they continue to blame all men (aka the patriarchy) for all of their problems it's hard for me to feel much sympathy.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/25 01:24 AM
25

Another gem from 4bmovement. When I read it yesterday I was expecting there would be some pushback (me thinking, "they can't really be this stupid can they?") but there was only one, and she's deleted it since then.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/08/25 06:55 PM
30

As someone who regularly browses the women's subreddits, including 4bmovement, this reminded me that what amuses me is how on the ask men subreddits, AskMen and AskMenAdvice, at least half of the posts are from women and those subs get a lot of posts, whereas the askwomen subs get just a trickle.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/08/25 06:45 PM
2

Oh come on, everyone knows that the patriarchy invented romance! /s
/r/EverydayMisandry15/08/25 01:35 AM
7

twoxchromsomes. I skim it every day. Oops, sorry I assumed it was twox, but it was 4bmovement; I have a multireddit that combines several of the women's subs. The amount of crazy and stupid in them never ceases to amaze me.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/08/25 05:04 PM
34

The suggestion that it’s basically still the 1950s is wild. Right, and in the 1950s many women were being "harassed, assaulted, and killed simply for existing" every day. /s The sad thing is that they really do believe this stuff. Imagine living in a constant state of fear like that.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/25 04:56 PM
7

Likewise her brain, but apparently that's asking too much.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/25 05:36 PM
3

There's a post over on r-askwomenover30 titled "What aspects of masculinity do you appreciate and wish more men would embody?" and the overwhelming percentage of responses are for how useful a man is, rather than their personality, sense of humor, creativity, etc. I've also observed this several times with wives describing their husbands; it's like they're talking about some hired help. It's not surprising to me since I believe in evolutionary psychology which says that due to evolution men and …
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/25 03:12 PM
2

I thought your question was entirely reasonable and logical and not at all snarky.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/25 03:05 PM
3

Maybe she was the only woman in that car. /s But your response is exactly what I was asking myself when I read this.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/25 07:30 PM
2

A guilty pleasure. Or maybe not so guilty.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/25 04:46 PM
1

A somewhat bruised female.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/25 04:43 PM
1

Somewhat interesting but also confusing video. He seems to be conflating hobbies with activities that men do regularly. For example, watching porn is not a hobby. It's simply something that a lot of guys like doing, because that's how our brains are wired, it triggers some pleasure neurons in our brains. He's also clueless about the hobby of cigar smoking. I've read about it and that really is a hobby. Regarding collecting Funko dolls, who's old enough to remember women in a frenzy collecting Be…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/07/25 04:19 PM
19

I forgot to save it but there was one of the usual posts in the WomenInTech sub where she's complaining about the men being promoted sooner, or her not being promoted, and she says it's also due to bro culture because the guys lack a "life/work balance" and how the guys regularly work 9 to 10 hours. There are also posts there about how the men get promoted and OP doesn't and says they're duds and she's much smarter and competent and either explicitly states or implies that it's due to sexism. Th…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 03:11 PM
-5

All this outrage over something which simply demonstrates how idiotic and foolish they can be. This is why they didn't go out alone and had chaperones and escorts back before first wave feminism, to protect them from their own foolishness.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/25 08:23 PM
20

But thousands of women are being raped every day and men get away with it. We don't need any books to help with that. /s
/r/EverydayMisandry19/06/25 05:38 PM
4

Have a look at the sub WitchesVsPatriarchy.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/06/25 01:40 AM
10

The only "person" who "set up the system" was Mother Nature; aka evolution.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/06/25 05:34 PM
12

shadowguyver should have responded that he sympathized with Brian Laundrie because Laundrie was mentally/physically/emotionally tired of listening to Gabby Petito's incessant and nonstop whining, bitching, and criticizing.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/06/25 02:49 AM
3

It's a word they made up, trying to make men feel insulted. Similar to calling a woman a wamen, bimbo, bitch, etc. Even if it is a slur I find it funny; they're trying so hard, and as usual not going anywhere. We should start calling ourselves moids to let them know that their childish games don't affect us.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/25 04:41 PM
19

It's also ironic that this writer is totally ignorant of men and how they feel. It's also interesting, so to speak, how feminists and women absolutely and totally believe that males and females are born with identical brains, and everything is learned. Therefore they believe that they understand men. And they believe that any and all differences between men and women are due to society, i.e., the patriarchy. Even though there are many men who also believe the blank slate theory, fortunately ther…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/25 01:45 AM
2

It's easier to assume that things are due to socialization, because we can't easily identify those things that are innate and due to our DNA. We don't think about our innate behaviors and preferences like we do the learned stuff. And so we assume that everything is learned. I'm beginning to think that almost everything that we think is socialization is really from our innate behaviors and preferences. In other words, the direction of influence is from people to society (society reflects what's i…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/05/25 06:07 PM
5

For me this is a perfect example of how men's and women's brains are different due to our DNA. Each side has different values with respect to our jobs and careers. When two men meet for the first time it's completely normal to talk about what they do, their jobs. Men define themselves by their jobs and careers. Women, on the other hand, do not define themselves by their job. My observation has been that when they're married they define themselves by their family and their children. Get two or mo…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/05/25 05:08 PM
14

And yet apparently women can't exert any self control and are forced to dress like the one in the comic. If anyone should suggest that they dress more modestly they fly into a rage.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/05/25 05:52 AM
7

I wonder how many trans women were homosexual before they transitioned and then therefore were heterosexual after transitioning. I was born in 1953 and remember reading stories about trans women back in the late 1960s and they were always homosexual before they transitioned. I suspect it's still true today; that the majority of trans women are heterosexual after transitioning. So this "predatory men" idea seems like a huge red herring to me.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/05/25 02:01 AM
59

"Men are killing women every day for saying no." Sadly, they really believe this. Some woman on tiktok or other social media makes an asshat claim like this and they all believe it.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/05/25 10:19 PM
1

Lol, she was a "sex worker." Is there some sort of kink for women who are obviously ugly and unattractive?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/05/25 04:53 PM
56

Well, if they did give any citations you can safely bet that they'd all be from "research" or random articles written by women.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/05/25 05:23 PM
3

medium.com is a slick site. It has a polished look that gives the impression that it's a source of honest and factual information when it's merely a place where people can post anything and whatever they want.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/05/25 06:47 AM
2

Doesn't matter what happens it was ruined by men, men held you back, men make it impossible. Because they can't figure out what's really going on. Facing the ugly truth is too horrible to contemplate. Now that there are more women getting college degrees and getting white collar jobs it's understandable that they're angry, because the men are still the movers and shakers and the ones getting things done. As a side note, back when I was a worker bee, before I retired, for 30 years I was a combina…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/05/25 02:42 PM
2

It's called pissing into the wind.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/25 06:07 PM
2

https://www.bps.org.uk/research-digest/infants-show-preference-toys-match-their-gender-they-know-what-gender https://neurosciencenews.com/gender-toys-neurodevelopment-4721/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7031194/
/r/EverydayMisandry27/04/25 06:06 AM
-2

For one, because it's harder to distinguish and identify our innate pre-programmed preferences or whatever you want to call them. My favorite example is the temperature of a beverage. Imagine drinking a lukewarm body temperature Coke. Yuck. It's an emotional reaction (and a strong one); there's nothing logical or rational about finding a lukewarm Coke yucky. If you know anything about biology it's not hard to figure out why we evolved to avoid drinking warm water.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/04/25 03:56 AM
0

They absolutely believe that male and female human brains are neurologically identical, at least at birth. And that male brains are "damaged" by testosterone and/or society (you know, the patriarchy). But research has shown that even in infants there are differences in how male and female brains operate. And basic human anatomy tells us that male brains are larger and heavier than female brains.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/04/25 02:34 AM
6

She's heard all about those messy gay orgies. /s
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/25 06:31 PM
2

I think it was more that men were upset that they were thinking emotionally and making yet another obviously illogical and stupid choice.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/25 06:28 PM
8

You're pissing into the wind if your post doesn't align with their way of thinking. Regardless of how logical and correct you think your post is. It's best to treat those subs as read only, as if you're already banned.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/25 06:18 PM
-124

It's a bit hard for me to imagine a male judge doing this.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/25 04:14 AM
1

It just reminds me how emotional they are; emotionally fragile and emotionally delicate. I see posts like this on twox where they keep reliving some bad memory from years ago and start crying or feeling the fear or whatever from the incident. Thankfully evolution made men emotionally durable. I could feel sympathy for them having emotionally week brains but it's not easy when all they can do is blame men for everything.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/25 02:27 AM
38

It always amuses me how they have a grab bag of mental health issues to choose from for an excuse; ADHD, PTSD, on the autism spectrum, and my favorite, neurodivergent.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/04/25 02:12 AM
3

I saw that this morning. It's no longer there though. Some of the posts there are so wacko crazy that I can't help but wonder if they're troll posts made up by guys to see how they'll respond (and to stir the shit obviously). For example, search in twox for "Many women don't work physically demanding or risky jobs because these jobs are designed based on what an average or fit man can do" which explains why women don't work in construction: the cement bags are too heavy. It's amazing how they ca…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/04/25 05:05 PM
84

I'm all for stupid people wasting their money on lawyers for frivolous lawsuits.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/25 06:56 AM
1

It would never survive. The proverbial snowball's chance in Hell. The feminists would be outraged and get the reddit admins to ban the sub.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/04/25 03:31 PM
2

Lol. I love scrolling that sub. It's all those "Look, women have always treated men good and look how men treat us" posts. So true. Another one is WomenInTech where I'm amused by all of the posts where male coworkers ignore them, don't acknowledge how much they do, and they see themselves as a stellar employee and the men are duds/slackers. If multiple/all of your male coworkers don't have a high opinion of you it's very unlikely due to sexism/misogyny/patriarchy, which is always their take.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/04/25 02:46 PM
1

Similarly to my above comment, on civitai, a site dedicated to AI image generation, the images of women invariably show them with that "I'm so hot" face, sometimes subtle, sometimes overt. Again, the men are at best smiling.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/25 05:20 PM
2

I think as men we have a built in-mechanism of chasing after our target while women have one for being pursued. Good point. When I'm browsing the male subs where guys post nude selfies, some of them are a link to a short video on redgifs. Under the video you're interested in are random ones from other people. Two differences between male and female vids are interesting. The ones from guys rarely show their face while the women often or typically do. In the ones showing the woman's face they alwa…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/25 05:13 PM
10

Bi guys talk about how dating a guy is much easier than dating a woman. I've never heard one say the opposite.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/25 03:53 PM
12

There are many physically easy jobs but that are dirty, or not so dirty, that you don't see women doing. Driving the trash truck, being a house painter, being a gardner/yard maintenance, pool maintenance, bicycle mechanic, electrician, computer repair, and so on; I'm sure we can all think of more examples. I read almost exclusively fantasy books where they're set in a pre-gunpowder age so they're using swords and armor, and I'd say that well over half of them have the town's blacksmith is a woma…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/04/25 02:30 AM
3

I use ereaderiq.com for downloading free ebooks from amazon. I'm careful to make sure that the book's author is a man, and that the main character is a man. In the about the author page some of them bend over backwards to conceal their gender and use gender neutral pronouns to describe themselves; I assume that a man isn't likely to do that and skip the books by authors that do that. I'll also do some web searching on their name to see if I can figure out their gender. Finding ebooks written by …
/r/EverydayMisandry16/04/25 07:02 PM
1

Yes, because women have been oppressed since the beginning of history and now it's their turn. I.e., two wrongs make a right! (Even when one of them isn't entirely true.) /s
/r/EverydayMisandry15/04/25 03:37 PM
7

No man has ever experienced a woman being a so-called back seat driver! /s I live in the suburbs and what's common here is the wife driving a mommy car, an SUV or a minivan. I'm an old geezer and drive like one, poking along at the speed limit, and these housewives in their mommy car are invariably speeding, because they're late, for example, taking Amber to her soccer practice. They're late no doubt because they were busy talking to Betty on their phone and lost track of time.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/04/25 03:30 PM
13

The big part that feminists always ignore is that women with an unwanted pregnancy didn't take responsibility for birth control. They have multiple excuses for not taking the pill or using an IUD. I read the twox sub and there are regularly women who "accidentally" got pregnant because they weren't using any birth control. Of course men also bear some responsibility for not using a condom. Back in the earlier days of AIDS when they discovered the HIV virus gay men knew they had to use condoms an…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/25 04:24 PM
1

Of course it's ok for them; don't you realize that they've been oppressed for thousands of years! Turnabout is fair play! /s
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/25 05:06 PM
3

Any time the article about sexism/misogyny/women's rights is written by a woman you can be 99.9% sure that it's all baloney.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/25 05:04 PM
6

Regarding that second comment, what I've read on MensRights and LeftWingMaleAdvocates is that the MensLib sub is run/moderated by women and feminists.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/25 04:58 PM
12

The "old man" was making a joke, but so many women are completely tone deaf when it comes to humor. I have a multireddit of several "ask men" subs and the amount of humor there compared to the complete and absolute lack of humor on the women's subs (like twox) is stark. Men can poke lighthearted fun at themselves and other men and we get it. When those "others" are women they are invariably outraged and offended.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/25 04:41 PM
1

What I've been finding interesting about posts on twox and the other women's subs is how they ask for advice about something that seems utterly trivially obvious to solve. (And since I tie everything to our DNA I have no doubt that this is an innate behavior for women.) The way she explains things it's obvious to her that her first friend is a problem. She simply needs to tell her to stfu, as one of the comments said. It's not rocket science or brain surgery.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/25 06:22 PM
2

I don't have any links handy but there is research showing how boy's brains and girl's brains are different, even in little infants where they've measured their responses to images by observing the size of their pupil and their brain activity. It's well accepted (but not with feminists) that males are more interested in and prefer working with things while females prefer working with people. As someone who worked in a STEM field (software development and server system administration) it's very o…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/04/25 03:52 PM
4

As a regular browser of twox and other women's subs the only time I'm surprised is when they're analytical and logical.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/25 04:37 PM
8

In addition to this bagspreading the other thing I see them do over and over is sitting in the seats that are clearly labeled as being for the disabled and elderly (next to the doors). Young women and obviously not having any mobility problems. And they bagspread, and never get up and offer their seat when a senior or disabled person gets on the train.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/25 04:10 PM
1

There's a similar thing with straight cis men. There have been multiple stories of straight men having sex with other men when women aren't available; prison, on a ship, etc. Who can say if they sexually aroused by the man at that time and if it was just for sexual relief. But when they get out of prison, off the ship, etc. they go back to being straight. I have a theory, which is hard to explain, that straight men are never 100% straight meaning that men's bodies are sexually repulsive, because…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/04/25 03:04 PM
5

A majority of gay men also find vaginas gross and repulsive (myself included). When they hear that they really go ballistic.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/04/25 04:21 PM
5

It's so bad that they don't believe in basic biology and evolution. Their thinking is that biology and evolution apply to the other mammals and animals but not humans. To me this is the fundamental problem with our society and women's problems; the majority believe that male and female humans are born with brains that are identically the same and that all differences are due to society. Until we understand that the sexes are neurologically different between the ears we'll never be in the positio…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/04/25 04:02 PM
2

That poor woman, I feel so sorry for her: "I have to still remind our two sons to shower and put on deodorant, etc. I have to remind my husband to put water softener salt in, to take the recycling out, to do the pots and pans." Those are extremely exhausting chores for her to have to do. /s
/r/EverydayMisandry07/04/25 11:35 PM
3

When I was 6 or 7 ears old, since I was born in 1953 that would have been around 1960, I lived with my grandparents on my dad's side for about 6 months. My grandfather was a blue collar worker and as was normal back then didn't do any housework. For their generation it was pretty much unthinkable for the husband to help a stay at home mother do the housework. They did have a washing machine but no dryer. I remember my grandmother would starch my grandfather's work shirts, by adding starch to a s…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/04/25 11:21 PM
6

I have a multireddit that's a combination of several women's subs; r/twoxchromosomes and r/women are two of them. Also a multireddit of several "ask men" subs. The difference between them is stark. On the women's subs well over (very well over) half of the posts are unhappy women whining and complaining while on the ask men subs there is very little of that, and there is also a lot of humor, which is completely absent on the women's subs.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/25 04:21 PM
9

An apt phrase for bi men. A recurring remark that comes up on the gay subs is bi men saying how relationships with guys are much easier/better than ones with women.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/25 04:16 PM
2

Mother Nature (aka evolution) made men the providers and protectors. The women on twox don't understand why with all of the advantages society has given them that they're still not the movers and shakers that men are. They believe that boy babies and girl babies are born with identical brains (and a lot of society does as well), even though simple human anatomy shows that male brains are bigger and weigh more. So to them it's "obvious" that this imbalance is due to, you know, the patriarchy. Plu…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/25 05:00 PM
5

Off topic, but who remembers regretsy? It was hilarious.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/25 04:44 PM
7

It's just yet another example of how stupid feminists can be. And they think that men are offended that they chose the bear. No, we're upset that you're being so stupid, yet again.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/25 02:44 AM
1

I take the very extreme view that due to our DNA that men's and women's brains are different. Just as the rest of our bodies are different. This is a concept that a very large percentage of humanity doesn't accept, and especially feminists don't accept it and revile it. Evolution doesn't care about being politically correct or fair. Due to evolution men have been given advantages, mentally as well as physically. But since feminists absolutely reject this idea their only recourse to explaining wh…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/03/25 04:44 PM
9

They love whining and complaining.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/25 04:07 PM
1

Is AI generated art portraying child pornography bad/wrong? A good site with lots of extremely realistic pornographic images is civitai.com, but they don't allow child pornographic images.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/25 05:29 PM
2

From reading the other responses I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one that doesn't get it.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/25 05:24 PM
1

Only very tangentially related, but thanks for the link to Damore's memo. When it came out I tried searching for it and couldn't find it. Stupidly, I was using google to search for it. Duh. And thanks for the links to related stuff.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/25 06:10 PM
9

My favorite example of how women aren't interested in a STEM field, programming and software development, is what's called FOSS; free and open source software. It's easy to see who's involved in working on and creating FOSS and the percentage of women doing that is microscopic. And there's nothing stopping them from doing it since it's all done by people at home and on their own time.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/25 07:57 AM
1

News stories reporting women experiencing violence grab more eyeballs, clicks, etc. Who can forget the daily updates on the Gabby Petito and Brian Laundrie story. Women are utterly mesmerized by those kinds of stories.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/03/25 07:33 PM
1

The womenintech sub is one of my favorite subs for seeing regular demonstrations of how women don't understand men (and how working in tech is often not a good fit for them). My interpretation is that the overall problem is that women/feminists believe that male and female brains are identical at birth and believe that men have been socialized (by the patriarchy of course) into "toxic masculinity" behavior. As an example, a regular complaint that comes up in that sub is the women aren't getting …
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/25 10:02 PM
29

It's obviously misogyny. The poor thing is yet another victim of the patriarchy! /s
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/25 04:23 PM
23

I love the last paragraph, that her conclusion was due to "women's intuition." And of course the fault is due to the "white, male leadership." Everything bad is always due to the patriarchy.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/25 06:20 AM
9

Her "provider"? That guy is a fool.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/02/25 04:41 AM
40

As a regular reader of twoxchromosomes, one thing becomes obvious. They exaggerate a lot. Her claim that they're all smoking weed is almost guaranteed to be untrue. They're in school so they could be studying, working on a paper, or other school work, or playing video games, etc. With women, whenever guys aren't interested in doing what they like doing they invariably think that something is wrong with them.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/02/25 11:26 PM
3

If you're using the old reddit that could be why. Try switching to new reddit to post images.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/02/25 09:54 PM
12

Back in "the old days" before women's lib and feminism, men protected women. Women didn't go out and about alone without a male escort. Women have an innate fear of being out and about alone, especially at night. It was a useful survival behavior back when we were evolving cave men. Now that they're liberated they live alone in a city and the fear is still there but all of their doom scrolling makes them think that men are the predators. They don't understand that their fear is innate and need t…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/25 06:14 PM
-1

In a way I sort of agree with it. I've noticed that when talking with one or more women that they are good at keeping track of different threads in the conversation. And are good at immediately coming up with rebuttals, where I don't think of them until a day later. But it could just be that I'm slow.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/25 05:44 PM
3

A lot of people still desire paternalistic treatment of women, even liberals and leftists at times. Absolutely. I often rant about Evolutionary Psychology and in this case I believe that evolution has hardwired men's brains with two core values regarding women, one, that our job is to be their provider and two, to be their protector. It's hard to see these innate values as not being learned since they end up expressing themselves in our society since we all agree about them being obviously true …
/r/EverydayMisandry30/01/25 10:33 PM
1

True. I didn't want people to think I was wasting their time since it's dead and no posts are allowed, except for a year ago back when they were announcing podcasts. But you can page down and read the posts from when it was active.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/01/25 04:47 PM
12

Back when this man vs bear thing started the feminists/women believed that men were insulted by women's choice of the bear. Some men may have been insulted but by and large men were upset that they'd choosen the clearly stupid and foolish option. Which only reinforces my belief that back in the Victorian days when women didn't go out alone but had an escort/chaperone that the primary job of that escort was to prevent them from doing stupid things. I.e., protecting them from themselves rather tha…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/25 07:02 PM
3

Yeah, when did dogs learn to make a sandwich?
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/25 06:55 PM
1

I miss FemaleDatingStrategy. It was very entertaining given how over the top batshit crazy they were.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/25 06:24 PM
22

I browse twox every day. Her claim "I've seen a lot of men on this sub promoting violence against women and trying to take away our rights over our own bodies" is complete bullshit. Men rarely comment there and posts from men are ones asking questions. Equally, her claim "boy moms blindly protecting their sons who commit DV" is also complete bullshit. So many women there are completely wacko.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/25 03:17 AM
6

I agree although it does seem to me that a lot of gay men idolize female vocalists/singers. Almost to the point of it being an obsession.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/01/25 07:35 PM
2

For me, from a biological viewpoint, it makes more sense that a person born male can end up feeling like they're female. The male DNA contains an X chromosome and a Y chromosome. The Y chromosome is what makes one a male. The female has two X chromosomes. My thinking is that something in the Y chromosome is missing or doesn't express itself strongly enough and the person ends up feeling like a female. Given that theory how would someone born with two X chromosomes develop into thinking they are …
/r/EverydayMisandry23/01/25 03:51 AM
9

Yes! She's a victim of the patriarchy! /s
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/25 11:57 PM
4

I wonder if they can do that if you remove the DRM? I no longer use my Kindle and now use a Kobo but I still get them from amazon since that's all that ereaderiq.com covers. There's a plugin for Calibre that removes the DRM (it needs my Kindle's serial number for the key), after doing that I convert them to EPUB and send them to my Kobo. So mine never get sent to my Kindle and live in both Calibre and in my Kobo (in EPUB format). I use their web page to download the book to my PC.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/01/25 12:21 AM
13

Any time a guy criticizes something that women do it's guaranteed that there will be a dog pile of women telling him he's a horrible misogynist neckbeard. Regardless of how true, correct, or valid his criticism is. I don't read comic books but there is a similar thing with regular books. There are many gay romances written by women for women. After I bought my kindle, at first I was getting books from the local library. They have a large selection of gay fiction. I was surprised at how many are …
/r/EverydayMisandry19/01/25 08:24 PM
-4

Effectively, men do have it easier than women. Evolution made us more proactive, self motivated, more willing buckle down and work through adversity, etc. Evolution made us be the providers and protectors. Feminists can't understand that and believe that we're all born with identical brains. Therefore their logic is that it's easier for us because, you know, the patriarchy. And that we're actively trying to prevent women from doing well.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/25 08:09 PM
-13

You're an incel! /s Here's an interesting essay on the patriarchy. I don't agree with everything she says in other essays, and her reliance on big words and dense writing makes it hard to wade through. https://np.reddit.com/r/gendertheory_102/comments/1flmr8h/patriarchal_realism_and_patriarchal_idealism/
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/25 07:53 PM
1

I'm guessing that's sarcasm.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 07:53 PM
1

I absolutely agree. I just think in order to figure out how to deal with these problems it helps to understand where they're coming from. The endless blaming men and the patriarchy isn't the answer.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 07:43 PM
-1

It's very hard to argue with people about a fear or dislike of something when those feelings are something that's hardwired in their brain because they are innate (put there by our DNA). These innate emotions are due to evolution. They're especially strong with women because they are much more sensitive to their intuition and gut feelings. For women, walking around alone at night is very scary. Even walking alone during the day increases their nervousness and apprehension. It's easy to understan…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/25 06:34 AM
6

Who knows. Remember during his last presidency where it was revealed that he spent an hour every evening talking to Sean Hannity, the guy on Fox cable? That was a genius move on his part because Fox does a lot of polling so he was effectively getting their polling data for free via Hannity. There's no telling where he got this "respecting women" idea from.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/01/25 03:03 AM
7

I didn't say that what he says will please his supporters, I said what he thinks will please his supporters. In my opinion Trump isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer but he is adept at manipulating his supporters into believing he has a plan, has values, etc.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/01/25 02:56 AM
25

Trump just says whatever he thinks will please his supporters.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/01/25 02:12 AM
16

wonder why they can’t follow their own assertion to its logical conclusion here The key word here is logical.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/01/25 11:29 PM
4

Since the title says "men" I'd say that "them" is men. As for the context it was a post on r / women, where they like love to complain about men, and of course, the ever-present nefarious "patriarchy."
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/24 05:27 PM
18

I forgot to add that (double negative warning) it's not uncommon to see posts where they say they hate men, on the above sub and twox and r / feminism.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/24 08:53 PM
18

I've given up trying to understand their gibberish. I'm sometimes amazed at posts where it's impossible for me to make heads or tails of what they mean but the other women don't have any problem.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/24 08:49 PM
16

I'm old enough to remember when the word misogyny only meant hating women. It had nothing to do with sexism. Now it means some combination of sexism and not supporting feminists (and apparently if you don't support feminists you must hate women). They're very good at redefining and repurposing words.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/12/24 02:52 AM
8

They also put themselves in bad situations. I see it all the time in posts on twox. And they rarely ever realize that it was due to their own actions. And if they do (very obliquely) they always excuse it with some self diagnosed mental issue; "I have PTSD/ADHA/on the spectrum/neurodivergent."
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/24 02:52 AM
22

Meanwhile all of the important and physically and mentally challenging jobs are done by men.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/24 09:48 PM
1

I agree with the part about not having respect for their wives. In the beginning (as I saw it, at least 10 years ago) it was only black gay guys. Their claim was that they couldn't be out because of the problems it would cause, but this was in the US, not some Muslim country.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/24 11:32 PM
20

Oh please, we all know that those poor unfortunate women are being forced to commit crimes by the patriarchy! /s
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/24 09:10 PM
5

In some ways what she says is true. My stepmother worked full time and also cleaned the house. In the beginning she took the laundry to a woman who did it for her. My dad likes to cook so she avoided that sometimes. All of their paychecks went into the same checking account, which I thought was the norm. Years later I was shocked to learn that some working wives have their own bank account and don't contribute anything to the living expenses. On the other hand I've come to the conclusion that a …
/r/EverydayMisandry30/11/24 03:58 AM
17

An easy way to see how that plays out is to look for things like tutorial youtube videos for technical stuff; software development, electronics, how to use 3d software, etc. Very rarely are there any women doing that. Another place is FOSS; Free and Open Source Software. The source for the software is made freely available on sites like github, sourceforge, etc. Again, 99% men. When there are women helping, it's usually stuff like documentation. In most of these situations the people doing this …
/r/EverydayMisandry29/11/24 11:24 PM
16

Also amusing to me is that on twoxchromosomes they often espouse that they wear those revealing clothes, wear makeup, get their nails done, their hair dyed, etc. because they're being forced to, by the patriarchy of course. Reiterating a previous post of mine, the real reason is here.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/11/24 06:30 PM
16

I'm not a biologist but this entry explains the concepts well for how our DNA affects our brains in gender specific ways. As a regular browser of the twoxchromosomes sub it's painfully obvious to me that women's brains are quite different than men's; i.e., how they react, handle problems, etc. https://www.britannica.com/science/evolutionary-psychology
/r/EverydayMisandry29/11/24 04:14 AM
1

Sorry, I want to keep it private.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/11/24 06:54 AM
3

This year, we decided not to "volunteer" to do it. We are too burnt out and underpaid to be doing any favors, especially not based on gender roles. Translation: "we're doing our part for 4b!"
/r/EverydayMisandry28/11/24 04:20 AM
5

I confess, it's one of my favorite subs. I have it in a multireddit containing /r/Feminism, /r/TheGirlSurvivalGuide, /r/TwoXChromosomes, /r/women, and /r/womenintech. I made my own sub, bizarretwoxposts, where I crosspost the more crazy posts (it's private so don't bother to search for it). Even though I recognize the blatant misandry it rolls off my back like the proverbial water off a duck's back. If I were to summarize it I'd say that 1, they rarely if ever take responsibility for their actio…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/11/24 04:15 AM
20

That's what almost all of them say when posting something on twoxchromosomes where they've screwed up; they have a list of various excuses; they're on the spectrum, they have ADHD, or, my favorites, they're neurodivergent or have PTSD. Taking responsibility for their actions isn't in the cards.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/24 07:13 PM
2

Also agree. Even if it's true and was done by some random wacko it doesn't help to leave those posts up. I have a multireddit that combines the subs againstmensrights AskFeminists badwomensanatomy BanFemaleHateSubs BlatantMisogyny FemaleDatingStrategy FeminismUncensored fourthwavewomen justneckbeardthings MenAndFemales menwritingwomen NotHowGirlsWork UnnecessarilyGendered WitchesVsPatriarchy and the majority of it strikes me as fitting your useful idiot definition.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/11/24 02:22 AM
1

Exactly.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/24 06:29 PM
4

The universal truth as declared by Your Omniscient Majesty Lumpynose is as follows: […] I reserve that style of elocution for when I'm around friends and family.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/24 10:52 PM
37

Yet more proof that their thinking is flawed. There have been several posts about how women glorify that they think with their emotions. Recently there was a post on twoxchromosomes about how women's thinking is better because they think empathetically.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/24 05:00 AM
6

"all the time"
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/24 04:41 PM
1

"No, no, no." Maybe if she said it even more they wouldn't arrest her. "I have rights." It's amazing how self delusional and manipulative they can be.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/24 04:17 AM
29

For some reason I don't see it any more but in my grocery store the women would always stop with their cart in the middle of the isle. If another woman came up and needed to get by she would always give a long winded discourse, "Excuse me, I can't get by, your cart is blocking the way, could you please move your cart?" Instead I would just say "excuse me" and they couldn't figure out why I was saying that. They'd go back to browsing and then I'd say "excuse me" yet again, until they finally figu…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/06/24 08:57 PM
18

If these femalepessimists believe that theory then shouldn't they also believe that their lack of the Y chromosome is what makes them less productive/competetive/etc. in the work force? Or why all the hard and important jobs are done by men? Or why "thinking" with your emotions is the right way to understand things? Or why women cry so easily when things don't go right? Etc., etc.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/04/24 05:24 PM
2

You don't get it, but given your post history I'm not surprised.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/24 06:00 PM
8

My point is that it will get lost in the deluge of "men are monsters, women are saints" posts on twox. It's true that it is surprising to see them condemning a woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/24 05:20 PM
3

"Maybe they're finally catching on that women do bad things too?" The probability of that happening is about the same as a snowball surviving in Hell. Here's an example from yesterday titled, "It just dawned on me; a lot of my sexual “experiences” in college were just rape". While it's true that they were rape, but what kind of idiot gets "blackout/brownout" drunk with drunk college frat boys? And don't get me started on what kind of clothes I'd bet she was wearing. I’m 30. I can’t sleep. I had …
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/24 04:56 PM
2

I fixed my response.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/24 04:47 PM
3

In the comments she says that the police were able to go after the sister because some of the photos were ones she hadn't sent to her boyfriend. Sorry, you're right. Maybe she changed what she had written but my memory is that she'd sent some of them to her boyfriend and the ones the sister posted included some she hadn't sent to her boyfriend. And I don't remember that part about them sitting in online storage.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/24 04:41 PM
21

I do a daily scan of twoxchromosomes and it's extremely rare for them to acknowledge that they made a mistake. She at least acknowledges that she should have had a password on her phone, but taking and sending nudes of herself to her boyfriend? I guess I'm old fashioned but that seems very foolish to me.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/04/24 04:31 PM
–

It's not hard to make a documentary that paints a much different picture than reality. As a side note, the Wendy Carlos that is in the list is a trans woman, formerly Walter Carlos, who made the popular Switched on Bach album.
/r/AntiFeminists25/03/24 11:28 PM
8

And all of the tools are free as well; Java, Eclipse, IntelliJ, Python, Go, Rust, Linux. As you said, zero barriers. And as u/az226 said, you can really see who's doing the work in the open source community. It's not that difficult to figure out the genders with places like github, or if you look at the list of developers for things like Debian, Arch, Alpine, and other Linux distros. Or look at who's making the tutorial videos for these things on youtube.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/02/24 07:03 PM
14

"This page was last edited on 29 February 2024, at 04:04 (UTC)."
/r/PussyPassDenied29/02/24 06:16 AM
43

Anyone who is a software developer and has worked with women would be skeptical of the idea that a woman invented computer programming. Women can be software developers but I've never met one who was creative and imaginative and enjoyed it. For them it's a 9 to 5 job. The guys on the other hand love programming and write a ton of free software simply for the enjoyment they get from doing that.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/02/24 12:30 AM
1

My theory is that it's evolutionary psychology. Women have an innate survival trait that makes them worry about being raped or mugged. In the old days women lived with their parents or a sibling until they got married and didn't go out alone at night. Now, women have to go out alone at night regularly, especially in the winter. So now this innate fear is being exercised (triggered) if you will, on a regular basis. They're like a kid who never outgrew being afraid of the dark. The problem with re…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/24 08:28 PM
18

The commute train I ride has clearly marked seats close to the doors that are for disabled and seniors. But who's always sitting in them? Young women and obviously able-bodied women. And when a disabled person or senior gets on the train, do they offer their seat? Of course not.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/24 08:13 PM
3

On the other hand it might raise some awareness about how women will call anything sexual assault, for example when all a guy might have done is look at her. There was a post today in twoxchromosomes from a guy who was on jury duty and during the selection process they asked each potential juror if they'd ever been sexually assaulted. He was shocked that every woman said that they'd been sexually assaulted, and if so then had a 1-on-1 private conversation with the judge and many of them were dee…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/02/24 03:40 AM
5

In the general sense many women love celebrity gossip. There's a good reason those magazines are next to the checkout at the grocery store. The male hating just adds an unsurprising dimension.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/24 05:42 PM
2

I found the original post and the following screen shots are funny as hell. In this screen shot I didn't catch how he's grim and glum in the second shot.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/01/24 05:51 PM
15

Even if I subscribe to WitchesVsPatriarchy?
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/24 10:08 PM
53

Almost all women seem to believe if they state something as a fact that it really is a fact. In their world facts are always negotiable. No need to understand or research, just toss things out there and see what sticks. Edit: I should add that my observation has been that with them facts are arrived at by consensus. State some "fact" and then the other women can debate it with you and eventually a consensus is arrived at for what's "true". And unlike men, they aren't embarrassed when they make a…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/01/24 06:54 PM
2

I would compliment the convict on good looks except that his ears are shaped differently.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 08:38 AM
-1

OP is implying that Trump is a pussy. /s
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/23 04:56 AM
7

Agreed. But when you have idiots like this She said she had heard a council member say: “Women should know their place in the kitchen and stick to ironing; men are the master race.” It just adds more fuel to their fire. The male managers need to document poor performance and not shy away from jettisoning poor performers, regardless of their gender. (I admit, I expect the majority of them to be women.)
/r/MensRights15/12/23 04:53 AM
8

The January after Trump was sworn in and all the crazy stuff started in the White House I was cackling to a guy about what a wack job Trump was. Foolish me assuming that in this deep blue state he wasn't a Trump supporter. Wrong. He tells me how he's looking forward to Trump ending government subsidies for abortions and how on the news there was a story about this woman who'd had 6 government assisted abortions. (Fox News, obviously.) I didn't think of it at the time (I'm always a day late when …
/r/MensRights15/12/23 04:45 AM
10

I'm always amazed at the posts on twox where a woman wasn't using birth control and she got "accidentally" pregnant. But guys aren't helping when they refuse to use a condom. The things that women have to use for birth control aren't always pain (e.g., IUD) or side-effect (the pill) free.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 02:11 AM
7

they just recreate what media feeds them. Definitely the media. Your title could be interpreted to mean their parents are doing it but I'd say it's very largely the media. I don't watch television or movies and only read books, mostly fantasy, and only male authors, and it's rampant. There are also many unrealistic jobs/careers, my favorite being the women blacksmiths.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 06:18 PM
1

it's your sex hormones at work I would argue that it's your innate behaviors, preferences, etc. These things that are innate we simply accept as fact and we don't think about them the way we do learned things. For example, we don't like drinking water that's body temperature and want cold water, because it's just obviously true in our minds that cold water is good.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 05:54 PM
2

"You disgust me! You dirty piece of shit!"
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/23 09:46 PM
6

Exactly. The first list just tells me that she's an idiot and believes all the crap that feminists spew.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 08:40 AM
9

To me the fundamental problem is that they're unable to think analytically and logically; they're programmed by their DNA to think with their emotions. In her mind your "long essay" was a perfect example of mansplaining, not the classic mansplaining where a guy is explaining something she knows, but explaining something that she's not interested in. Explaining something that requires logical analytical thinking to understand.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 08:35 AM
0

I voted for Reagan when he ran against Carter. Carter was a dud in his first term. Reagan said a lot of compelling stuff. But things really went down the toilet with Reagan and I learned my lesson and now always vote Democrat. As a friend of mine once said, the worst Democrat is always better than the best Republican.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 10:24 PM
1

Me and a few other dudes. Just dudes. Exactly.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 04:25 AM
16

Women are far less sexually aroused by a man's body compared to how aroused men are to women's bodies. If you learn about evolutionary psychology you'll understand that this is innate, and gender specific, that men have a much more reactive libido to visual stimuli. But feminists preach that boy and girl babies are born with identical brains (which is utterly wrong). And so they then believe that whatever differences there are in our attitudes, behaviors, etc. have been learned and that we're do…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:51 AM
2

In their defense I will make my usual argument about evolutionary psychology. This fear that women have about being out and about alone is innate. They "know" that they're in danger because their brains tell them so. The neurons that are telling them this were put there by evolution. It's very hard to argue with someone about an innate preference, fear, behavior, etc. because we rarely think about and analyze our innate things, we just "know" that they're true. And since it's a gender specific i…
/r/MensRights11/12/23 06:09 PM
13

it's hypocrisy all the way down on all sides. His slides don't say anything about biphobia from gay men. When I was younger I had the typical gay men's belief that bi men were secretly gay but didn't want to commit to being gay and were playing it safe by playing both sides of the fence. Even when gay men believe that someone is really bi they're nervous about a relationship because they think the bi guy will dump them for a woman in a heartbeat and that they secretly yearn for a heterosexual ma…
/r/MensRights11/12/23 07:57 AM
15

So I'm having an argument on this thread on twitter Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 04:23 AM
4

I bet you didn't know that the first coders were women Yes, I've seen that claim. As a programmer having spent my entire career working with women I seriously doubt that claim. I would be willing to bet that if you looked more closely at those numbers from back then that you'd discover that those "women coders" were in fact women keyboarding, typing in code that produced the punched cards that the computers used back then. I started programming in 1979 and there were still images of punched card…
/r/MensRights10/12/23 10:17 PM
6

Men simply get coding and computer technology/architecture better than women do. My favorite example is free and open source software (FOSS). The percentage of women writing FOSS is microscopic.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 10:07 PM
11

Saying someone hates women isn’t an insult. Hating women has no impact on sexual access and in fact can be quite successful. Apologies in advance for my pedantry. Feminists have so relentlessly used the word misogynist incorrectly that dictionaries now use their meaning. Previously it had meant someone who hates women, plain and simple. But if you use an online dictionary they now also say that the person is sexist. It's annoying to have the meaning of words change but it's important to understa…
/r/MensRights10/12/23 10:02 PM
1

COBOL
/r/MensRights10/12/23 09:49 PM
0

What DougWeatgerdon said. On the other hand, with these types of videos you can be absolutely sure that they're heavily edited and that they cherry picked the parts to make their point.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 03:16 AM
14

For your item 2 you should also accept that you're a misogynist, neckbeard, incel. /s
/r/MensRights09/12/23 06:00 PM
6

This is an industrywide problem. Obviously they should fix this problem, by hiring women even when they are uncreative and unimaginative. /s
/r/MensRights09/12/23 05:56 PM
2

GenderCritical I never knew about that one. It was banned 3 years ago. FDS sort of took themselves offline and now just announce their podcasts. While it was active it was a goldmine of the most amazing and bizarre crap. I miss it for its regular reminder of how unreal their thinking can be.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 05:24 AM
3

Spend a little time browsing twoxchromosomes and you'll see plenty of toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 05:10 AM
7

I'd say that it depends on your mind set, and what's going on in your life. For the latter, having a rewarding and satisfying job can make a huge difference. For the former, your mind set, I went celibate in the 1980s because gay men were dying like flies from AIDS. I never stopped being celibate. Here I am 70 years old and still happy.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 05:06 AM
93

Before I figured this out I was always surprised to hear a woman praise her husband, the praise being the things he does for her. It sounded like she was talking about the hired help.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 05:02 AM
0

Again, conspiracy theories are not the way forward.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 08:02 PM
3

Even so, I can't imagine that all of the work necessary is financially viable for amazon, ereaderiq.com, and don't forget my county library. It's too easy to see conspiracies where financially it makes no sense. I think that it's more that there are many bored housewives who are writing. Or they have easy jobs and have the mental energy to write in the evenings and weekends.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 07:41 PM
3

I dunno. I don't see how they could know which authors are male and which are female (given how much work it is for me). It seems to me that it would be a lot of work to determine the author's gender and I don't see how favoring female authors would benefit ereaderiq.com or amazon.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 07:26 PM
6

With all of my thinking and ranting about evolutionary psychology I've been wondering if Mother Nature evolved women to be more desirous of and successful at being manipulative. It's like it's automatic with them, and they're so successful at it.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 06:33 PM
8

Despite white males still making up over 70% of the authors of sci-fi/fantasy still. I wonder if that's really true. I only learn about new authors (to me) by downloading free amazon books by way of ereaderiq.com and I would guess that over 90% of the fantasy authors are female. That's on ereaderiq.com's daily listing. But even with my local library the male authors are definitely a small minority. It was certainly true that male authors were the majority "back in the good old days" of science f…
/r/MensRights07/12/23 06:04 PM
5

Nah, I read that series and wished I hadn't wasted my time on it. I barely finished the last book of the series; it was painfully dull.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 05:48 PM
7

I download a ton of free books from amazon every month by using ereaderiq.com. A few years ago I came to the conclusion that women authors typically (always?) seem to fail at logic in their books. They'll make their characters do stupid things and I've wondered if they think they can put stupid stuff in their book, because, hey, she's the author and it's her story. So now when downloading books via ereaderiq.com I diligently make sure that the author is male. Additionally, due to the Galbrush Pa…
/r/MensRights07/12/23 05:46 PM
-37

OP, I hope you weren't circumcised as a child. After seeing all of your posts to CircumcisionGrief I think it would be unfortunate if your obsession spiraled out of control like it did for this guy.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 11:29 PM
18

Promising herself that she's not going to do anything like this again or again. Oh please, these women are so stupid that I'll bet she'll do it again next week.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/12/23 03:59 AM
-7

Arguing with intactivists is like arguing with feminists. They're all emotion and no logical analysis.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 03:56 AM
1

We have the ability to move past basic instinct and we do it frequently, but it requires effort and (I hate this term but I don't have a better noun for the concept of "the state of paying attention") mindfulness. I agree, up to a point. The point being there's a gender difference. Feminists and most women are deeply invested in blaming everything on the patriarchy. I'm convinced that they're innately wired to think with their emotions rather than analytically. And then there are problems with g…
/r/MensRights04/12/23 11:50 PM
1

They're incapable of self reflection and self analysis.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 06:14 PM
5

So often I feel like in the end it always comes down to instincts and innate preferences, values, etc. But we've always believed that we're not like the lower animals and don't have instincts and we learned everything, so it's nearly impossible to get people to understand.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 06:10 PM
-11

He's definitely Trump's bitch.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/12/23 05:13 AM
4

Looks like it's from an article in Jezebel. Need I say more?
/r/AntiFeminists02/12/23 05:59 AM
1

Now we know why your palms are so hairy! /s
/r/MensRights02/12/23 12:02 AM
2

So true. I couldn't help laughing when I read that site. But it's so sad that it's come to this.
/r/MensRights02/12/23 12:01 AM
1

These are a great example of how successful feminists are with being manipulative.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 11:53 PM
1

Weird picture of Musk? I'm assuming that's who the 3rd one is.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 10:46 PM
12

I'm always skeptical when I hear about or see women doing something that men have only done. It always feels to me like they're doing it simply because they're trying to make a point that women can do the same things that men do, i.e., they're not doing it because they enjoy doing it.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 04:15 AM
7

Personally I'd rather talk to a guy though... more interesting conversation. You're not big on gossip I take it. 🤪
/r/MensRights30/11/23 04:05 AM
13

The feminist's idea that women don't bear any responsibility for their behavior is so bizarre.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 09:23 PM
1

But for women, the main tools are verbal and emotional manipulation and social cunning. So very true and this is the really hard part to counteract. Guys in this forum often say that men who support feminists are just simps for sex but I think it's more complicated than that. For example, the overwhelming majority of gay men support feminists but they're obviously not simping for female sex. Gay men are overwhelmingly liberal and liberals by and large support feminists so they're just following …
/r/MensRights29/11/23 05:51 PM
85

For me it wasn't any one thing. I worked at a well known left wing university doing software development and system administration, always with women coworkers. What was always forever annoying was how the women put in the baseline amount of effort and then complained about the men getting the higher paid and more important positions. There were never any women who enjoyed the work while there were always many men who did. Oddly, two of my best supervisors there were women.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 03:39 AM
4

I read a lot but I no longer buy any books written by women for multiple reasons.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 03:28 AM
1

Or maybe Florida women have learned to not misbehave? /s
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/23 11:20 PM
2

They're all several years old.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/23 10:28 PM
-8

if women can hunt while breastfeeding they can definitely do office work Admit it, you just want to see their tits while they're breast feeding. /s
/r/MensRights28/11/23 10:24 PM
23

What WonderfulPresent9026 said, "Basic critical thinking is lost on these people". Feminists and most women "think" with their emotions rather than use analysis and logic.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 10:20 PM
17

ok, what the fuck happened to women since then? how did they become so completely physically inferior to men in every way when they used to excel? Dude, get with the program; it's a well known fact that it's due to the evil nefarious patriarchy! /s
/r/MensRights28/11/23 07:49 PM
94

I knew it was going to be all downhill when I read the early line, "our studies are trying to correct the history that erased women from it".
/r/MensRights28/11/23 07:47 PM
0

For me the problem boils down to the simple fact feminists and the majority of women don't think analytically and logically, they instead "think" with their emotions. Using objective logical reasoning with someone who's thinking with their emotions is a waste of time.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 06:24 PM
3

You guys missed their byline, how they define themselves, "Academic rigor, journalistic flair". /s
/r/AntiFeminists25/11/23 03:55 AM
2

One thing they overlook is that news outlets love negative stories, stories about things going bad, companies and the government screwing up, etc. They love them because they are the most likely to grab eyeballs, get clicks, etc. So if vaccines are having all of the problems that anti-vaxers claim, how come we don't hear about them? There's no advantage to their profits for the news outlets to suppress that information. Plus, the insurance companies would be howling about them as well.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 07:01 PM
8

I'd put them above rich women.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 05:51 AM
11

You missed the cross post a year or so ago of some woman saying that men's thinking is faulty because we don't think with our emotions.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 03:35 AM
9

Even though I believe in evolutionary psychology 100% the problem with it for feminists is that it opens the can of worms showing that women have many preferences, behaviors, and values that prevent them from being equal with men, mentally. In other words, it raises the specter that the Victorians were right, that women are overly emotional, are less analytical, less logical, and so on. But shouting down and dismissing evolutionary psychology doesn't help them in the long run.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 03:32 AM
1

Evolution has dealt women a poor hand. Not only do they have smaller and weaker muscles but their brains aren't as strong and don't perform as well. When faced with difficult situations men deal with them. Even though I'm an atheist this song from the Mormons captures the idea well: The world has need of willing men Who wear the worker’s seal. Come, help the good work move along; Put your shoulder to the wheel. Women on the other hand whine and cry and expect someone to help them when facing dif…
/r/MensRights23/11/23 03:18 AM
1

I knew there had to be a good reason it's called the porcelain throne.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 05:46 AM
1

i will never understand this. Because you don't think like a woman. It seems like a good example of how these ways of thinking are innate. If everything is learned, how could we learn to be so different about handling problems?
/r/MensRights18/11/23 10:54 PM
3

Women vent just to talk and don't want to hear about solutions. Yep. I see that every day multiple times a day on the women's sub. They call it venting, I call it whining.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 07:57 PM
2

Here it seems that all of the ambulances are part of the fire department. When an ambulance is called you typically see a fire truck as well as the same colored ambulance. I've wondered why that is. One reason could be that the ambulance companies were charging a fortune so the city decided to take over their job.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 04:12 PM
16

Speaking from the perspective of someone who believes in evolutionary psychology, women don't believe in it (evolutionary psychology). Feminists preach that male and female babies are born with identical brains and everything that's different about our behaviors, preferences, etc. has been learned. They think that we just need to unlearn our "unhealthy" male behaviors and preferences and that we'd be better of if we thought and acted the way they do. I don't know if it's gynocentric or some othe…
/r/MensRights18/11/23 04:04 PM
36

Why do too many women stay silent? Because they spend a lot of time talking about women and girls being sexually assaulted by men and they believe and tell each other that female on male sexual assault is a tiny insignificant percentage. They are the perfect example of being self-centered.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 05:48 PM
2

Their biggest asset is to sound knowledgeable and convincing, like they know what they're talking about.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 10:36 PM
1

I used to go to a local Mexican fast food joint for lunch and it catered primarily to Mexicans/Latin Americans. They had a big screen TV in the seating area tuned to the Spanish language stations. It used to make me laugh seeing the news and weather announcers; always young women with big boobs and lots of cleavage and tight clothing. Likewise with soap operas. The stations were totally shameless; you could never get away with that in the US.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 10:32 PM
6

All of the authors are from psychology departments, a field that doesn't like the idea of evolutionary psychology. My claim is that they do what they feel is necessary because it's an innate quality/preference/value. Which in a way corroborates their findings, but not for the same reasons; i.e., I believe they do it unconsciously, but there is certainly overlap with their findings. My attitude is if they want to dress like a whore, they can. But then they can't complain about "unwanted" attentio…
/r/MensRights15/11/23 10:25 PM
2

Those poor nuns, ravished by big hairy blond Nords.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 08:26 AM
3

I was born in 1953 so I have a longer term perspective. I blame bad societal changes on the internet. My theory is that it amplified and accelerated things. The web and web browsers started taking off in the 1990s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_web_browser
/r/MensRights15/11/23 03:32 AM
1

The patriarchy of course!
/r/MensRights15/11/23 03:25 AM
1

Made me laugh; you are too funny. And of course I agree completely.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 05:06 PM
14

"Thats weird. Fathers on their own seem to manage fine" Using logic. How dare you!
/r/MensRights14/11/23 08:42 AM
1

Agreed, see my response to you just above.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 04:27 AM
6

Women like talking and discussing and sharing ideas so reddit is a great place for that. I'm also starting to think that's why there are so many illogical (aka, moronic) responses, for example, defending a person's boneheaded behavior. Responses that the more logical and analytical men are unlikely to make.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 04:25 AM
-2

Right. If they don't have a pram they can park however they want.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 03:28 AM
3

I'm guessing the extra space is for the rear of the car for when they're getting the pram/stroller out or putting it back.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 03:09 AM
10

My favorite post in this sub.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 03:04 AM
9

I'm old enough to remember a visit to a dentist's as a kid and there was a big sign over the restroom that said "NO BLACKS". It was in the early 1960s. This was in Virginia in a small town outside of Richmond.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 03:00 AM
1

They shut down and only announce podcasts now. It was my favorite sub for absolute batshit bizarre behaviors and beliefs. Twox is very tame in comparison.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 02:54 AM
8

Is Reddit mostly women or what? That's what I think it is.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 02:48 AM
1

What are you reading on FDS, the podcast discussions?
/r/MensRights14/11/23 02:28 AM
19

It's disappointing how many feminists/women think that being confrontational and combative means that they aren't being a pushover.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 09:10 PM
7

My guess is that it is related to better reproductive success. My thinking is that all of our innate preferences are due to evolution favoring ones that improve the chances of reproductive success. And they got refined or more focused with each evolutionary step. It's not easy to figure out exactly how all evolutionary things came about. My favorite example being how the cuckoo bird reproduces and uses other birds to raise their offspring.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 07:44 PM
7

And we all know that the patriarchy is what's behind these impossible standards. Forcing those poor unfortunate women to wear sexy revealing clothes. /s
/r/MensRights13/11/23 06:57 PM
3

Yeah, it's what makes them so amusing. They're so obviously moronic that it's funny.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 08:25 AM
5

The satchel-sized bag was dropped by astronauts Dern, she dropped her purse. Where's a man to pick it up for her?
/r/MensRights12/11/23 05:11 PM
6

Looks like a student newspaper for Berkeley High, in Berkeley, California. A very far left city.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 05:08 PM
18

No, I don't think you're making it up at all. One of my pastimes (or self abuse as some may call it) is browsing the twoxchromosomes subreddit. I'm always agog at how many women there self-diagnose themselves as being "on the spectrum" (autism spectrum), or neurodivergent, or suffering from PTSD from some sexual abuse/harrasment trauma years ago (for example, some guy called her a bitch). There are probably others that I don't remember. What makes it even more interesting (amusing) is they alway…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 04:44 AM
19

Misogyny is a word whose meaning has changed. It used to mean simply a hatred of women. Feminists have redefined it to mean sexism against women, or to use skymonstef's words "catch all term for anyone who criticizes feminists or feminist theory or holds women accountable."
/r/MensRights12/11/23 04:19 AM
7

Don't forget camel toe.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 01:23 AM
19

You're forgetting; the patriarchy is making them wear those sexualizing clothes. /s
/r/MensRights12/11/23 12:15 AM
2

Particularly when they post in this sub about how they support MRAs. It just comes off as so much patting themselves on the back.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 12:12 AM
17

Maybe it's socialization but I would guess that for pumping iron not many men would want to wear something revealing like in the OP's picture. Men aren't like that, wanting to show off their junk. And I don't agree that tight clothing is the most practical. Back when I worked out I wore the usual baggy stuff and don't recall ever having any problems with it. For stuff like wrestling, yes it's more practical. But for working out with weights, running, etc. no. Women wear the tight stuff because i…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 11:54 PM
2

They think with their emotions and whip themselves into a hysterical frenzy. I regularly see posts on the women's subs where they describe a situation with themselves as a perfect angel and the guy, out of the blue, behaves horribly. They have selective memories for one thing, and as usual, they're unable to objectively analyze and figure out why something happened. And, of course, they can never think that maybe they did something wrong.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 08:45 PM
4

So stupid but for me so funny with my snarky dark sense of humor. I use github for backing up the software I've been working on and the git software it's based on uses the word master for the initial primary version. Out of all of the various definitions for that word they focused on the one for slavery so they've changed it to use the word main instead of master.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 08:23 PM
63

I'm always amused by how if you bring this up with women they'll start screeching that they're not dressing that way for attention but that they're doing it for themselves, because it makes them feel good and happy. And then they'll complain about the unwanted attention, the creeps, wolf whistles, etc. The problem is (begin evolutionary psychology rant) that they're right about it making them feel good. Their wanting to dress sexy is the flip side of the coin to men's preferring attractive women…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 08:11 PM
2

I concede.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/23 10:20 PM
6

Very true. Thanks for adding that. One of the things I've noticed on twox is that they seem unable to make a decision until they ask for advice from others. And for so many of their queries I think, "You can't figure that out for yourself?!"
/r/MensRights10/11/23 07:00 PM
9

Arguing with people online is like pissing into the wind. I prefer to simply state my position/opinion and leave it at that; if anyone posts something disagreeing with me I just shrug.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 06:34 PM
7

Thinking objectively, analytically, and rationally seems to be nearly impossible for them. And they love hysteria. I'm starting to think that it's not so much that they're malicious but that they're so emotional that your examples seem reasonable to them.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 06:30 PM
4

He wants to hear from "practicing homosexuals".
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/23 06:20 PM
10

Item 3. They think with their emotions rather than being analytical and logical.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 05:08 AM
2

Yeah, it's my daily dose of "wow, they really are a mess."
/r/MensRights10/11/23 04:59 AM
5

Downvoting you for using your damning logic! /s
/r/MensRights09/11/23 05:31 PM
9

The lack of left-handed spoons, pencils, and screwdrivers is sexist.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 05:20 PM
0

My take, as usual, is that it's DNA and evolution. Men have been preprogrammed by our DNA to see ourselves as the providers and protectors. On the flip side of the coin women have an innate value that makes them look to men as the providers and protectors. Men can be more aware of their innate vales (realizing that they're innate), women much less so, if at all. So if you don't fit her concept of what your role is, you're in trouble.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 05:17 PM
2

I still have never seen an original Tate video. I've only seen ones that have been cropped and edited or stills with text overlaid, to make him look bad. And I can't help wonder how many of his haters are in the same boat with me.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 05:11 PM
5

As a libtard I think that climate change is a red herring and that the real problem is overpopulation. Obviously overpopulation is the fault of the patriarchy. /s
/r/MensRights08/11/23 05:07 PM
6

I used to subscribe to r/BigDickProblems (not because I have a big dick but gays are often mesmerized by them) and it definitely comes up there. Guys who "unfortunately" have a big softie can get in trouble at work from some woman noticing their dick's outline in their pants by reporting them to HR. Of course the women can wear skimpy tops that show a lot of cleavage and ones that are tight with their nipple clearly obvious. I was on another forum that had a subforum specifically for men and a w…
/r/MensRights08/11/23 04:59 PM
1

I'm resisting the urge to say 5 days. Then someone can say 5 minutes. Then 5 seconds.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/23 04:43 PM
23

it's our fault because we're not doing enough to "make women feel safe". Meanwhile they're running around dressed like whores and can't figure out why men are ogling them, wolf whistling, and giving them "unwanted" attention. Just recently a woman posted asking for help because whenever she bends over her boobs fall out of the skimpy top of the dress she's wearing. The answer was boob tape.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 06:35 AM
4

Gay couples do it. But they have the advantage of two incomes.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 03:58 AM
2

It gets even better when you join the patriarchy guild.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 03:54 AM
5

The ol' white male debuff.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 03:46 AM
4

Feminists would rather us be transparent and call it International Patriarchy Day. /s (but not that sarcastic)
/r/MensRights08/11/23 03:45 AM
18

5 years months probably
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/23 03:36 AM
1

Right. Whenever someone trots out some conspiracy theory about a company or companies, it's often not hard to debunk it by asking how it helps their bottom line.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 06:19 PM
6

Do they hate seeing other people happy, successful, and enjoying their lives? I'm guessing that this is part of it. Men are successful because we work hard while women lack that value. I'm thinking that in their minds the patriarchy is how they "rationalize" so to speak, why men are still the movers and shakers, the problem solvers, the ones who get things done. It's much easier for them to believe that they're oppressed rather than trying to figure out what they can do to be better. The other t…
/r/MensRights07/11/23 02:34 AM
70

Porn and videogames have always been the response - not the reason - but the media will never admit it. Women are probably well over half of who are the biggest consumers of what the media produces; news, tv shows, whatever. So it's in the media's self interest, i.e., profits, to target those who are the bulk of their consumers. In other words, it's not a conspiracy by the media, it's simply about their bottom line. Sure, it's irritating, but hey, it's business as usual.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 05:34 PM
16

In their minds the problem is always the men helping each other. Aka, the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 05:28 PM
3

I think the official name for the department at a university is Public Health. Or at least that's they majored in for women who become social workers; Family Services, Child Protection Services, etc.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 05:26 PM
2

See my response above. 😊
/r/MensRights05/11/23 02:29 AM
2

For your next punishment we're going to make you spend an hour reading r/WitchesVsPatriarchy.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 02:28 AM
7

As a gay man one of the first things I discovered about how different women are when talking to them was how indifferent they are about the size of dicks or its aesthetics, compared to gay men who are very concerned about a hookup's dick. I have no idea what the percentages are but some gay men are more into a guy having a nice body versus a nice dick, but even those have a definite idea about an "unacceptable" dick due to size or whatever.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 02:13 AM
5

Only tangentially related. A man whose wife has a child that isn't his is called a cuckold. The word comes from the cuckoo bird. Do a google search for "Why dont cuckoos raise their own?" How in the world did evolution create that?
/r/MensRights05/11/23 02:02 AM
7

The patriarchy is manipulating them to be more religious. /s
/r/MensRights04/11/23 02:25 AM
1

Yes, that's the problem with the science of evolutionary psychology; it contains many very unpalatable truths. Evolution was never about being "fair."
/r/MensRights03/11/23 06:37 AM
1

With me it always boils down to evolutionary psychology. They can't accept that men innately think differently, typically more analytically and logically. And rather than try and understand the differences they get aggravated and resort to condescending and childish ideas like mansplaining. Before first wave feminism, back in the Victorian days or whenever, they accepted that men were explainers and didn't make a big deal about it.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 06:13 AM
2

typically because he underestimates the woman's knowledge or expertise on the topic That's the part I don't get. Are we supposed to be mind readers and know what knowledge or expertise they have on the topic? I could see it if a guy was explaining menstruating, using nail polish, or makeup to a woman, but I doubt that happens very often. I stick to my original theory which is that men like understanding things and we'll automatically explain things. When you do that to a guy there's no resentmen…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 03:01 AM
11

In their minds they spin everything so that there's no such thing as "without any influence by men". They imagine the overarching overpowering patriarchy is always influencing them, no matter what.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 09:44 PM
2

The earnings gap (not the wage gap) shows that women are less able, less likely, to earn as much as men. Evolution dealt them a shitty hand by making them weaker both mentally as well as physically and less motivated to be a good worker. Conservatives will see this as more nanny state bullshit but I think that all of society should provide them a reasonable living while they are taking care of the kids. (After that they can get whatever welfare would pay them, if anything.) So in other words, ou…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 06:18 PM
12

That's interesting. I saved a post from my favorite female sub, the body of which is below. I was thinking that she exaggerated since the difference between 3 inches and 6 inches is a heck of a lot. But maybe it's true? I’ve cried ALL DAY! Went to get a haircut at ulta and the hairdresser showed me she was going to cut off about 3 inches of hair and I agreed! She gets to it and I’m working on my phone the whole time. By the time she’s blow drying my hair I realized how bad it was. My hair was ju…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 04:51 PM
20

https://www.reddit.com/r/JustGuysBeingDudes/comments/17g4gpk/a_group_of_guys_walking_through_the_park_running/
/r/MensRights30/10/23 02:01 AM
5

and men apparently walk blithely through life without bad experiences. The patriarchy is protecting and shielding us! /s
/r/MensRights28/10/23 06:21 PM
13

Absolutely. I laughed. But when you hear about how much the ex gets from the rich husband it makes you realize that it's not all that wrong.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 05:35 PM
6

I have a theory that men have an innate value to be the provider and protector and on the flip side of the coin women innately recognize that men are the providers and doers. As with many or most of these innate things that are gender specific, men are more likely to understand that "that's how men are" while women think that their innate values are rational and logical (or whatever it is that's going on in their brains). As an example, on a women's sub, whenever they complain about how the medi…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 05:18 PM
11

Learn the difference between femininity and feminism.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 04:52 PM
1

That's like having a women's driving lane. Us old-timers may remember the sexist jokes about "women drivers."
/r/MensRights27/10/23 07:54 PM
2

I'm going to cry myself to sleep tonight missing this poster.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 05:40 PM
9

I'd flip it around and ask why women get so excited about birthdays when men are so "meh" about it.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 05:33 PM
1

Send them to a convent with a holy terror mother superior. /s
/r/EverydayMisandry27/10/23 04:46 AM
5

This reminds me of way back when Gloria Steinem was the face of women's lib, we had the National Organization of Women, and there was Ms Magazine. Was that second wave feminism? Back then they understood that by wearing sexy clothes and makeup they were sexualizing themselves and discouraged it. There was even a "burn your bra" movement. I never saw the word patriarchy used back then. But who did they blame for their desire to wear sexy clothes and makeup? Why men of course.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 02:09 AM
4

I think it's the allure of the unknown potential versus looking like a whore where you're thinking, "Like a doorknob, everyone's had a turn."
/r/MensRights25/10/23 07:03 PM
27

What drives me crazy is that they're incapable of making the connection between what they're wearing and the behavior of random men complimenting them, whistling at them, etc. A woman wearing what's in this picture (ignoring that she's older) is much less likely to get unwanted objectifying comments compared to this or this.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 06:01 PM
1

Yes. My observation/experience is that before gay marriage was legalized the majority of gay men regarded women as irrelevant and unimportant. And I think that because we aren't attracted to them it made it easier for us to recognize or not overlook their shortcomings. Why it changed as a result of legalized gay marriage I'm not sure, other than feminists are on the left and the left supported gay marriage.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 05:19 PM
9

I think they are just too wimpy to speak truth to power in the way they claim they want to. I think they just don't think analytically and logically, instead thinking with their emotions. As usual it's innate behavior so to them, thinking with their emotions feels perfectly natural and obviously correct.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 03:59 AM
7

Yes, it's unfortunate that this sub is so politicized and right wing. Men's rights affects all men.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 03:52 AM
18

Mods, please add an irony flare. More accurate would be an idiocy flare.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 03:49 AM
10

Yeah, compared to straights I don't doubt that it still is a lot easier. But I was only comparing how it is now for gays versus how it was before the internet for gays.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 03:37 AM
18

Absolutely true. As an old geezer who started using computers before the internet (1979, when I got out of the Navy) and who is gay, I can see the exact same problems with gay dating. Before the internet guys meeting guys was much better and productive. On askgaybros there's a continuous litany of guys complaining about how hard it is to meet other guys, whether it's just for a hookup or for something more. I feel like I dodged a bullet because I went celibate around when I turned 30 (when every…
/r/MensRights25/10/23 03:27 AM
7

In one of the feminist subs someone asked "Does misogyny strictly refer to hatred of women?" and their comment elaborated about how it also means sexist. It was interesting (or rather disappointing, but not surprising) how most, if not all, of the responses claimed that it's always meant sexist and against women. I pointed out that in the old Webster's dictionary on Project Gutenberg the definition was purely that it was a hatred of women. Women truly are masters at manipulation. (Oops, I used a…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 09:47 PM
3

So you're trying to tell us that erasing and changing the words with man in them isn't making them strong and independent? /s
/r/MensRights24/10/23 09:40 PM
3

Blame it on Mother Nature.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 05:09 PM
21

Yeah, because the patriarchy has been around for 2.5 million years! /s
/r/AntiFeminists24/10/23 04:16 PM
1

According to this article what happening in the U.K. is what the WHO recommends. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-10-18/low-us-covid-booster-rates-show-cdc-needs-to-change-strategy?accessToken=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzb3VyY2UiOiJTdWJzY3JpYmVyR2lmdGVkQXJ0aWNsZSIsImlhdCI6MTY5NzYzNTgzNywiZXhwIjoxNjk4MjQwNjM3LCJhcnRpY2xlSWQiOiJTMlBaVUlUMEcxS1cwMSIsImJjb25uZWN0SWQiOiI0QjlGNDMwQjNENTk0MkRDQTZCOUQ5MzcxRkE0OTU1NiJ9.1oplGLdwtEz2unVrtbBD65ue3eeKhzWAU08KS59OelY I don't know w…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 04:08 AM
1

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/namby-pamby
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:08 AM
2

Sure, fellow atheist here. I consider myself a liberal/left and always vote Democrat even though some of their values aren't in alignment with mine. The leftwingmaleadvocates sub is a bit too namby-pamby for me.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 10:38 PM
51

Lacy and her colleague Cara Ocobock from the University of Notre Dame examined the division of labor according to sex during the Paleolithic era, approximately 2.5 million to 12,000 years ago. Through a review of current archaeological evidence and literature, they found little evidence to support the idea that roles were assigned specifically to each sex. The team also looked at female physiology and found that women were not only physically capable of being hunters, but that there is little ev…
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/23 10:07 PM
1

The authors are both female.
/r/Male_Studies23/10/23 03:14 AM
2

raditionalists because it implies that things like gender roles are conditional, not necessary, and certainly not innate I don't see it that way. My theory is that any traditionalists who don't like the idea do so for the same reason the overwhelming majority of society doesn't like it, which is historical. Humans have always believed that everything is learned. Even preferences, like men finding young women more sexually attractive. It's very hard for us to think about and analyze innate prefer…
/r/MensRights22/10/23 08:55 PM
16

I'm an outlier and enjoy browsing twox. For me it's a regular reminder of how incredibly emotional and irrational their thinking can be. Your two equivalencies perfectly encapsulate twox.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 07:01 PM
9

I'm guessing that the OP thinks that evolutionary psychology is some fake/soft science that's part of the field of psychology. Maybe having the word psychology as part of the term/name makes it confusing. But it's about evolution and DNA. Feminists don't like the idea of evolutionary psychology and I think they're the ones that are calling (renaming) it gender essentialism, but I haven't looked at it closely to see if it's the same thing as evolutionary psychology.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 05:31 PM
9

Exactly. Today on my favorite female sub a woman who works at the front desk of a hotel complained about a guy checking out telling her she was beautiful and said he'd be back in town next month and asked her if she'd like to get drinks when he comes back. She said no thanks. And then came to reddit to rant about it. The nerve of that guy! /s
/r/MensRights22/10/23 01:09 AM
30

The comments at the bottom are hilarious. My favorite one being "Like a doorknob, everyone's had a turn."
/r/MensRights22/10/23 01:05 AM
1

But the gynos could get qualified/licensed or whatever for the gas couldn't they?
/r/MensRights21/10/23 03:57 PM
1

I was thinking the same thing about your NHS. And the stoic British nature; so true, but I hadn't thought of that.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 03:53 PM
16

Yep. There was a similar post about the speculum, what they use to spread the vagina for pap smears and whatnot. How after all these years (over a hundred I think) it's still painful.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 02:50 AM
10

Yeah, same here. Even worse, mine was like Throwawayhealingsoul's above; the woman technician looked at the xray and said, "yeah, you've got cancer" and walked away. I felt like she clearly wanted to make me feel bad, which I did. The oncologist I saw a day or so later said it was nothing, probably because I was a runner.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 02:48 AM
6

What about pap smears? There's a constant stream of posts on twox from women who find them very painful. I can't decide if they're just a bunch of crybabies or if it really is that painful. (And how in God's name do they manage to give birth to a baby?) Anyhow, I was wondering why the doctors couldn't use laughing gas like my dentist offers when I've gotten a root canal. That stuff is really great for reducing the anxiety, which I suspect is the real problem.
/r/MensRights21/10/23 02:44 AM
69

Oh c'mon. The inventor clearly made it intentionally painful since it's for women. /s
/r/MensRights21/10/23 02:40 AM
1

Considering how much long term damage it can do I'm really amazed. I thought you Brits were smarter about these things than us over here in the US. I'm guessing it's because your economy is in the toilet after brexit?
/r/MensRights20/10/23 04:55 PM
1

In the U.K. they stopped giving boosters unless you are 60 or over. That's crazy.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 04:50 PM
1

Hey guys, the new booster is available. I got mine last week.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 04:19 PM
94

And of course the feminists will tell you that the judges were biased. 😒
/r/MensRights20/10/23 04:15 PM
0

Have you ever read about how a mass of lemmings will march off a cliff when their population is too high? I'm one who believes that global warming is a byproduct of overpopulation. I'm wondering if things like television and the internet make the world seem smaller and make us more aware of overpopulation. A few days ago I saw an article about a bunch of species that were taken off the endangered species list, because they're now extinct, and those are the result of human overpopulation.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 04:13 PM
1

Of course! We need to destroy the patriarchy!!! /s
/r/MensRights20/10/23 03:15 AM
4

Or is it just an attempt to rewrite the narratives about gender roles and perceived strength? That is it, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 03:07 AM
1

Oops, the last one is gone. I'd had another link to the study but it's also gone. I have a sinking suspicion that the feminists are behind its disappearance.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 04:25 PM
8

Believing that humans have innate preferences, values, and behaviors throws a huge monkey wrench into everything the psychology field has believed in. Humanity has always believed that we don't have instincts like animals, e.g. birds flying south in the fall, building nests, etc. Which we may not. But clearly we have innate preferences, values, and behaviors. But we don't think about them in the same way that we think about things we learned. Our innate things are what you could call universal t…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 04:18 PM
3

In addition to my above response, here are some links for evolutionary psychology. I haven't read the ones that can be edited by anyone; one that had been on my list was "fixed" by feminists so I removed it (I think it was rationalwiki). https://www.britannica.com/science/evolutionary-psychology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_psychology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_psychology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_versus_nurture https://ofboysandmen.substack.com/p/e…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 04:05 PM
29

My standard argument: before I retired I wore two hats, server system administrator and software developer. In the world of software development is this thing called Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). The majority of it is not applications but stuff you'd use to create applications. It's all freely available from github, sourceforge, and other sites like that. The tools, compilers, IDEs, etc. for creating it are all free. Finding any women creating FOSS is rare. Similarly, I have a little hom…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 04:01 PM
3

Definitely agree. The question is, are we taught to be better at handling stress or is it innate?
/r/MensRights17/10/23 08:50 PM
6

So Machiavellian. I like it.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 06:55 PM
6

This means men are more capable of facing hard times and pushing through. ... Modern women usually in my experience tend to put themselves first As usual, my take is that these are innate behaviors. I do think it could be helpful to try and raise them differently. But to be honest I'm not optimistic that it would stick.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 06:52 PM
18

Women innately know that fundamentally their value is all about how attractive they are. So naturally they're going to do everything they possibly can to make themselves more attractive. Men, on the other hand, innately know that their value is all about being a good provider and protector. So being "hot" just isn't on our radar. Also, guys who do spend a lot of time on their appearance and grooming can be viewed as prissy by other men.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 02:35 AM
49

Pragya Agarwal is a speaker, consultant and author of four books on bias and social inequalities. So she's basically someone who's full of hot air.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 07:45 AM
9

But faking disease seems mostly a female phenomenon. It's rather interesting to see how many posters on twox are self diagnosed with a variety of different mental health issues. I'd guess more than one every day. It also demonstrates a different attitude about mental health; I'm guessing that most men even if they were diagnosed by a psychologist as having some mental health disorder wouldn't be running around telling everyone the way women do with their made up disorders.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 02:16 AM
6

A woman journalist wrote that article. Clearly not up to snuff since she only found women fakers. /s
/r/MensRights15/10/23 02:13 AM
5

See below for what u/entingmat2 said, "The question should be, what can women learn from men." If you were to weigh all of the bad traits and behaviors that feminists and women have and compare them to the weight of the bad traits and behaviors that men have, the weight of the women's and feminist's would be much greater than the men's. Likewise, if you were to weight all of the good traits and behaviors that feminists and women have and compare them to the weight of the good traits and behavior…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 03:41 AM
3

sovinist -> chauvinist (english)
/r/MensRights11/10/23 10:37 PM
5

If it'll make you feel any better, the negative comments aren't so much about women but feminists.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 10:28 PM
2

My theory is that they have a lower threshold for what they find visually attractive. I realized this when I took up knitting and saw how they like things with a lot of colors. Unfortunately the bar is so low that it doesn't matter if the colors don't work well together, just being colorful will be appealing. They also like things that sparkle and are shiny, thus the appeal of jewelry and gemstones (fake or real).
/r/MensRights11/10/23 09:29 PM
7

And listening to your "gut" instead of using cold unemotional logic and analysis.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 09:25 PM
9

The heresy of nonbelieving! 🤮
/r/MensRights11/10/23 07:18 AM
39

It's been discussed before here how the word misogyny used to mean hatred of women. Today's feminists have redefined it to mean someone who's sexist. I think your description might be a better way to understand their use of the word misogyny. In their view, if you don't support feminism then you must hate women, so yeah, you're a misogynist and sexist.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:56 PM
14

An hour old account. With only this post.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:10 PM
7

I'm not sure I agree with that. Back when I was in my 20s (1970s) you could have a low skilled job and survive by sharing an apartment with a few other guys. Now the price of rent (and food and whatnot) is so sky high that they're forced to stay living with their parents. Back then when I lived in San Diego I think I was paying less than $500 (maybe it was $300?) for a single bedroom bungalow/cottage and it wasn't in a slum, a decent area called North Park.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:53 AM
-3

For me it's the usual explanation: DNA. Just as men are preprogrammed by our DNA to be providers and protectors, women have been preprogrammed by their DNA to expect men to be their providers and protectors. It's obviously not some a value that they're consciously thinking but as you can see it clearly manifests itself in their attitudes.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 11:46 PM
11

"The bulk of the earnings difference between men and women in the same occupation arises largely when they have children, Goldin found." Yep, that right there tells the feminists everything they need to know. Yet again, that nefarious patriarchy victimizing women! /s
/r/MensRights09/10/23 11:40 PM
1

I'm guessing China.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 05:31 PM
3

I think you give more weight to socialization when I believe that much more weight should be given to evolution; in other words, nature over nurture. wikipedia - evolutionary psychology encyclopedia britannica - evolutionary psychology wikipedia - sex differences in psychology wikipedia - nature vs nurture rationalwiki - cognitive differences between sexes (Rational Wiki's page on evolutionary psychology appears to have been "updated" by feminists.) The "boy babies prefer cars while girl babies …
/r/MensRights09/10/23 02:38 AM
19

So let me get this straight; you're expecting her to analyze and understand something obvious? /s
/r/MensRights08/10/23 07:54 PM
7

Who hasn't seen the Mandingo porn novels about a white woman willingly being ravished by a big strapping buck African male?
/r/MensRights08/10/23 03:49 PM
35

This was posted on twoxchromosomes (8 months ago; I'd saved it). When I first read it the whole thing sounded a bit off and after thinking about it I realized that what the paramedic was most likely doing is holding a stethoscope on her chest right near the heart and monitoring it while en route to the hospital. 14.4k upvotes. Last night I was the victim of abuse by a paramedic in the ambulance on the way to the hospital. I have frequent non-epileptic seizures as part of PTSD, which in consequen…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 03:37 PM
4

A few feminists comment sometimes. If everyone would downvote their comments they'll get the message and leave and/or delete their comment.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 04:46 AM
5

I agree, it is. It's also why I like to browse the twoxchromosomes subreddit, to see the variety of bizarre thinking that they engage in. No logic, just emotions.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 04:43 PM
13

Don't expect objective rational thinking from them.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 04:38 PM
1

You're just having trouble realizing that they really are that stupid. I mean, how can they be that stupid? And yet, they are. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/16zaqbo/women_are_attracted_to_the_patriarchy_they_make/k3dyaih/
/r/PussyPass06/10/23 05:25 PM
2

and the streets are filled with murderous psychopaths A lot of them already believe that.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 04:35 PM
3

Technologies like Tinder, Instagram, social media, are directly targeted at manipulating them and screwing their male-selection instinct If you're an old geezer like me it's easy to see how much the internet has damaged some aspects of our lives. For my first 40 years there was no internet and things didn't really get going until I was around 50 or so. Instant access to news for example. News corporations are extremely good at presenting themselves as purveyors of important and necessary informa…
/r/MensRights06/10/23 04:30 PM
4

An hour and twelve minutes. Wow.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/23 04:15 PM
8

Engaging on reddit with someone you disagree with is like pissing into the wind.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 05:13 PM
9

Yet another comment from me about what I see in twoxchromosomes: They love to whine. Especially whining about stuff that's not true as the other comments here show. And never trying to understand what's going on, and with the usual attitude that it's men's responsibility to fix things for them. This is why I feel that even with all of the misandry and problems men face, I have no doubt that men will still be on top, because we get things done instead of sitting around whining about whatever.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 01:39 AM
29

After reading twoxchromosomes it's my impression that in addition to making bad decisions based on superficial values that they also make bad decisions based on an endless list of incomprehensible reasons. I keep coming back to my conclusion that they don't think analytically and logically and instead think with their emotions. And yes, it's more often than not some guy's fault.
/r/MensRights04/10/23 04:24 AM
1

Postpartum abortions.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 08:26 PM
6

I'm always amazed when I see posts on twoxchromosomes where the OP "accidentally" got pregnant. They're always very clear when they got pregnant and were using birth control. Many of them believe in the guy pulling out before ejaculating is safe, as is using a calendar and when their period happens (as if ovulation happens like rigid clockwork). It's the usual story where they just can't see where they had any responsibility when bad things happen.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 04:06 AM
1

Finally, an excuse to buy a Rolex watch! I would prefer a platinum one but unfortunately I can only afford the cheapest least expensive ones.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 02:11 AM
6

I forgot to add the /s at the end.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 09:43 PM
1

Damn OP, see what you have wrought? Over on twoxchromosomes search for the post titled 'How do you guys feel about being referred to as “females”?' I also like how she referred to them as "you guys", which I didn't even notice until I saw her apology for it.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 07:37 AM
11

I'm like u/RatDontPanic and don't watch movies or TV. I'm a voracious reader, with fantasy being my favorite genre. The one that always makes me roll my eyes is when the blacksmith is a woman. Or even just the women assassins, women soldiers wielding big swords, and being masculinized.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 03:16 AM
-41

BUT THEN THEY MIGHT BE REJECTED RAPED. /s
/r/MensRights30/09/23 03:11 AM
1

Speaking of the "horrid" words female and girl, there was a recent post on twoxchromosomes about how people need to stop using the word "guys" when referring to a mixed group of people, or even all women. The reason given was that guys is a male term and by referring to women with it you're "erasing" their identity. 🤪
/r/MensRights30/09/23 03:08 AM
41

Trust your gut Trusting your gut is what women do. It's thinking with your emotions. We're better than that. As a man you can analyze and think logically about something and come to a rational conclusion.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 12:04 AM
5

Because we are wired to solve problems. We don't bottle up emotions, we create solutions. This, 100%. Also, women innately are naturally programmed to solve their problems, questions, puzzles, etc. by discussing them with others. For them, trying to solve something by analyzing it by themselves is unnatural.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 05:16 PM
4

Males don't suppress their emotions. They just don't emote like females, and since psychology is mostly populated by females, they consider that anything not done like females do it is just not done at all. Hence they consider that males suppress their emotions. I think we're mostly in agreement but my take is slightly different. There's probably a word for it ("projection" maybe?) but whenever we hear about someone doing something that we wouldn't do we assume that their reason for doing it is …
/r/MensRights27/09/23 05:11 PM
9

That is some incredibly bad writing. OP, I'm impressed that you were able to understand and glean any information from it.
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/23 04:54 PM
9

Right. They wouldn't complain if an older guy was wearing a suit, a Rolex watch, and was driving a Mercedes.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 03:30 AM
6

Women are more emotional than men so seeing that may make you think that they're more involved in the friendship. But it's superficial emotions. The other thing that may make it look like they're more involved is that what they spend all their time talking about is family and friends. What we used to call gossip. Again, rather superficial.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 03:24 AM
11

Psychology Today is to the field of psychology like CNN is to the field of political science. It's basically a sort of tabloid of easy to read fluff for the masses.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 03:20 AM
2

The /s means sarcasm.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 09:00 PM
3

From the few comments I read I got the impression that they were more likely orthodox Jews.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 08:59 PM
3

Not shanking hands is NOT employment discrimination. It most certainly is if you're a feminist! /s
/r/MensRights26/09/23 08:56 PM
3

It's a tough job but somebody's got to do it. 🤮
/r/MensRights26/09/23 03:40 PM
1

Re-read what I said. I didn't say they were the only ones, but that was the only thing they were against. Although that wasn't the only thing, but they were not doing all the weird and bizarre stuff they're doing now.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 06:51 PM
1

There are some grisly things that have been done to animals with no benefit to research. I had worked in a medical research department at a university. In their early days PETA was only pointing out these kind of things.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 04:03 PM
7

PETA has really gone off the rails.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 01:28 AM
2

The argument that the women use is that the child can be affected. For example, the mother can't work wile caring for it and so the child can be malnourished, neglected, etc. It's a compelling argument for a lot of people. But I agree that the mother shouldn't be able to scam some guy to pay for child support when he isn't the biological father. With all of the taxes we pay it should be the government who foots the bill.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 09:19 PM
23

"Emotional intelligence". What a farce. Only feminists could be so dense as to believe that thinking with your emotions is a good thing. I'm a voracious book reader and get many free ebooks by way of ereaderiq.com but I never download any when the author is a woman, or the main character is a woman. The latter because of the Galbrush Paradox, the former because women are less analytical (that good 'ol emotional intelligence you know) and thus more likely to write plots that are stupid.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 09:13 PM
2

It's always what life insurance has primarily been about.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 09:07 PM
11

"Spoonamore".
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/23 02:57 PM
1

For me because it's a stupid article.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 03:47 PM
1

"He's a rough and tumble wee boy." So British. I love it.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 02:33 AM
2

As a gay man I'm always amused by the teenagers on askgaybros complaining, "Why am I always horny?!" and I'm thinking, welcome to manhood dude. This is definitely an advantage that women have over men, not being horn dogs all the time.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 02:56 AM
12

This guy hits the nail on the head. Women see all of these places where men are the majority and they can't understand and accept that it's because the men are more self motivated, working harder, and so on. So they blame it on the so called patriarchy. https://www.reddit.com/r/MediocreTutorials/comments/16lk1io/short_the_difference_in_men_vs_womens_self/
/r/MensRights19/09/23 05:42 PM
2

For some reason archive.ph gets stuck in a "are you a person" loop for me on firefox, but works with edge.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 07:11 AM
4

https://archive.ph/0ORkg
/r/MensRights18/09/23 07:11 AM
3

Dern, you got me.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 01:49 AM
6

Another thing that I suspect might be part of it is that women have a hard time dealing with disappointment, that is, when their team loses. I'd bet after that final soccer match that if you went into the women's locker room for the team that lost you'd find many of them sobbing and crying, brokenhearted. And they take everything personally.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 01:13 AM
9

a normal real conversation Sorry, but I'm extremely sceptical.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 01:08 AM
34

What's funny to me as an old timer is that we went through this women can enjoy sex thing way back in the 1970s or thereabouts. Old timers may remember "the G-spot". As someone who engages in self abuse by reading the twoxchromosomes sub it's interesting to see the regularity of posts from women who find sex uncomfortable or who aren't having orgasms.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 01:03 AM
8

You're reading the wrong dictionary. The OED says, "Advocacy of equality of the sexes and the establishment of the political, social, and economic rights of the female sex".
/r/MensRights18/09/23 12:54 AM
8

Except that the feminists can never accept the argument that nothing is keeping them from attaining those positions. As soon as you say or even imply that it's not men's fault then they tune you out.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 03:43 AM
6

Ignorance.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 05:02 AM
1

Definitely a feminist buzzword compliant statement.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 10:26 PM
3

@OP: you might prefer the LeftWingMaleAdvocates sub.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 10:19 PM
8

Exactly. Or to quote a Christian saying, "Hate the sin, not the sinner."
/r/MensRights14/09/23 10:16 PM
1

Minnesota perhaps. It's like Sweden; the only time the weather is nice is July, maybe also June and August.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 08:53 PM
4

I didn't save them but there were some funny starter packs about single men vs single women. The single man had lots of money (because he didn't have to spend it on his wife), he could play video games whenever he wanted, etc. I think I saw it on one of the women's subs, and you can bet they were livid.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 08:32 PM
0

Talk about a hill you don't want to die on. Being anti intactivist in this sub is definitely a no-win situation. But just to stir the poop: https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/mentaldisorder
/r/MensRights14/09/23 08:15 PM
5

Nothing worse than having your pimp call you a female.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:55 PM
3

Now they do not. But back before AIDS we did. One of the interesting things about getting old is seeing how styles and mores change.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:53 PM
1

If you're not getting it I won't waste any more time.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:50 PM
1

My point still stands about boys learning what is and isn't appropriate behavior.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:36 PM
1

possessive/jealous/rude behaviour Sure, boys can openly display love. I was referring to your triumvirate of words above. Those are the things that I think boys have a much better grasp of compared to girls.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:28 PM
2

A key tenet of radical feminism has always been the rejection of biological essentialism – the belief in innate, biological sex roles. It's basic biological science. Just like men have bigger and stronger bodies we have larger brains, as well as mental and psychological advantages. I believe that MRAs should be vocal supporters of "biological essentialism" and back it up with citations from research and studies that show it's true. Taking the bull by the horns, grasping the nettle, etc.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:10 PM
1

After thinking about it some more I've flipped flopped. Imagine if it were a little boy and he was hugging his mother. To me that's a much less likely possible scenario. Maybe because boys have an innate understanding of what's acceptable behavior, or, more likely perhaps, because because boys are taught, from an early age, what is and isn't acceptable behavior. I live in the suburbs and regularly see children and it's very obvious that girls are given much more leeway when it comes to unaccepta…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:02 PM
8

Thanks, that sounds right. Another forbidden word, among my fellow gays at least, is the "F" word, fag. Someone explained it to me but it didn't really stick; I still don't understand why we can't say these words when we're talking about the word, its etymology, when it's appropriate or inappropriate to use it, etc.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 05:02 PM
10

Sorry, what's the "R" word?
/r/MensRights14/09/23 04:23 PM
2

From looking at NuketheCow's comment history on other posts he seems like a reasonably intelligent person. Beats me. But it's true, the huge amount of upvotes is wrong.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 04:13 PM
3

NuketheCow's comment got a huge amount of upvotes while BassBootyStank's explanation got downvoted.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 04:10 PM
2

she was so focused on her training That's one of my observations, that women are very rote about what they were taught/told. Minimal analysis and going with "this is what they told me." Which brings up another memory of when I was locking my bike outside the library and there was a woman on her phone, getting yelled at it sounded like, and she kept saying, "but nobody told me!" and I could easily imagine the person on the other end thinking or saying that she should have been able to figure it o…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 01:24 AM
1

how badly women are treated while committing genocide. No, they'll complain about how axes are made for men and they broke a nail when swinging the axe.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 12:46 AM
9

If you're a man, you won't be able to. Can't anyone claim to be non-binary or do they only allow afab non-binary this privilege?
/r/MensRights14/09/23 12:42 AM
2

I'll always remember my experience back in the 1990s with a woman who was a research psychologist with a PhD from Stanford. The two of us were volunteers for a non-profit organization that trained service dogs for disabled people (in a wheelchair typically). Like Guide Dogs for the Blind this organization's breeding program was based on the concept that smart dogs come from smart parents so they skimmed off the very smartest dogs during their training and made them breeders. I once remarked to t…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 12:37 AM
2

Women and their disingenuous questions. 😒
/r/MensRights13/09/23 10:37 PM
1

For punishment my fucked up stepfather put me in a closet and closed the door. One time he did it when he and my mother went away for several hours; he put a piece of tape across the door on the outside and let me know he'd know if I'd opened the door.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 10:31 PM
3

Women are much more successful at manipulating. Thankfully, men are much less likely to be manipulative and deal with problems head on rather than be manipulative.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:54 PM
1

Given that I'm a big believer in innate preferences I would say that there's definitely a certain amount of what we find sexually attractive that's innate. But it obviously varies due to societal conventions and whatnot. For example, back in the 1990s women were expected to be quite thin, and there were problems with women having bulimia and anorexia. Now, zaftig women are in vogue.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:41 PM
5

I would phrase the question differently. There's sexual attractiveness, where you're only interested in a hookup. And there's overall attractiveness, physical and mental, where you're interested in a long term relationship and marriage.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:21 AM
12

Let him wear a kilt. It sounds like the kind of school that forces left handed students to write with their right hand. There was a poster on r/casualUK that said that's what they went through.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 02:13 AM
2

There was a post earlier today (it looks like it was removed) from a woman complaining about how she works with a bunch of men and they're always competing and that she didn't like it and found it "exhausting" to deal with and wanted them to stop. Pretty much all of the responses were saying that being competitive is how men are and that it's a good thing. It made me realize that it's yet another innate trait that men have, while women typically take it personally when someone tries to one up th…
/r/MensRights13/09/23 02:03 AM
6

Also confused here so I looked it up. This is from helpfulprofessor: Liberals strive for equality of opportunity. Leftists strive for equality of outcome. Liberals support gradual social change. Leftists advocate for radical social change.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 09:19 PM
3

Directly related to this is the Galbrush Paradox. As a result of it requires female characters to not have any weaknesses, flaws, or shortcomings.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 07:29 PM
2

Or as they get older, not rape but women who are trying to get pregnant and then soak the guy for child support, or entrap him into marrying her.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 03:45 AM
11

I thought they only came to the house if someone reported the parents/mother. I knew a woman who was a retired social worker and worked in the child protection services department. She had once made the comment that when making a case to remove the children they were often in front of the same judge who would invariably side with the parents/mother unless it was an exceptionally extreme situation.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 05:28 PM
2

Good point; I can't disagree with that.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 05:11 PM
4

It sounds to me like it was some sort of underhanded ploy to demean and belittle you. It never ceases to amaze me what women will say.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 05:01 AM
23

financial support from both of your parents is NOT a right to which children are entitled. That's the part where it gets sticky with the women. For them it's a compelling argument that it's the welfare of the child that's at issue and most important.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 04:52 AM
7

What makes this article amusing is the expected reaction from the women on twoxchromosomes. Go to twoxchromosomes and search for “Telling women how to cut the risk of rape is anything but sexist” from The Times and you'll find the post. Their argument against this idea (i.e., the responses from raginghappy and Vagina_wielder) is that when a rapist is in the vicinity he's going to rape a woman, any woman, and a woman dressed like a tart, a floozy, and/or being drunk is merely making herself more …
/r/MensRights11/09/23 04:32 AM
6

Regarding your specific example, Clinton was an absolute dud. I felt that she did as well as she did because 1, she would have been the first woman president, and 2, she wasn't as incendiary (read: crazy) as Trump. What I read is that Trump won due to the electoral college and the way the voting districts are set up while Clinton got a million more votes than him. Even though I always vote Democrat I confess that those 4 years of Trump were very entertaining. If he's re-elected I'll be looking f…
/r/MensRights10/09/23 09:34 PM
0

All of these comments remind me of a section in the book You Just Don't Understand by Deborah Tannen about how some county or city school system graphed the grades of the kids over several years. The graphs showed that for technical subjects, e.g., math and science, that the girl's grades went down around a certain age while the boy's grades remained the same. Tannen relates how the school system talked to various people and couldn't figure out why but then got the right answer when they brought…
/r/MensRights31/08/23 05:31 PM
11

Being able to pee standing up. (Women could if they had one of those funnel things for when they're camping.) Not having periods and period cramps. Not having to give birth to babies and the nine months of carrying the baby. But these are biological; nothing to do with society or laws.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 11:14 PM
8

I regularly, daily see posts on twox about women being in therapy. I knew a woman who had a PhD in psychology from Stanford. She was a psychology researcher. She once told me that one of her thesis advisers told her that therapy had a success rate of about 50%. In other words it was random, like flipping a coin. My theory about why women like therapy is that it's because they love talking and discussing. (And from reading twox, boy do they love whining.) For them, talking about their problems ma…
/r/MensRights30/08/23 11:10 PM
6

But her husband (and the patriarchy of course) was the cause of it! /s
/r/MensRights29/08/23 06:02 PM
1

Mae West: "Is that a banana in your pocket or are you just glad to see me?"
/r/MensRights27/08/23 12:48 AM
1

The /r/Nicegirls sub is my new go to for today's laughs. For male positivity and silliness try /r/JustGuysBeingDudes and /r/MensHighJinx.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 03:27 PM
4

Yet another example of how the patriarchy hurts men as well! /s
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:17 PM
0

Because when women do it it's hot. Lesbian porn is made for men. Gay porn is not made for women. On the other hand, what's a mystery to me is that there are many gay romance novels that are written by women and their target audience is women.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 03:55 PM
9

Yes, the bar is very low for women today for what they classify as sexual assault. Here's a recent post on twox titled "Someone in my class kissed me without my consent when we were drunk, is that assault or something else?" where a woman got a little peck on the cheek kiss and she was freaking out. The first response was "Yes, it absolutely is assault. He has used unwanted physical force against your will. There was no consent." How much more emotionally fragile can they get? Hi Reddit, I'm a u…
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/23 01:46 AM
3

Makes sense; everything else is our fault so why not this? /s
/r/MensRights23/08/23 04:43 AM
1

Yep, I've seen the same thing.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 04:22 AM
1

Exactly what I've been thinking.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 04:05 AM
7

It's certainly inconvenient for women. But I can't tell how much they suffer from it. Over on the twoxchromosomes sub every day there's a new post about the pain and suffering they go through from the cramps. And then there are posts about how terrified they are when they go in for a pap smear, and how painful it is and how their obgyn is unconcerned about their pain. One women told about how she was crying throughout the entire pap smear procedure. Because of all of the supposed trauma they suf…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 02:56 AM
1

These meta-analytic findings offer limited support for the ideological component of the patriarchal theory of wife assault Obviously they used flawed methodology. /s
/r/Male_Studies23/08/23 02:28 AM
2

Viking genes.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 05:23 PM
1

In the US a woman can still win alimony if she lived with a man. And definitely can get child support if they had any kids.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:58 AM
-1

Fundamentally women's fear of being out alone at night is an innate survival trait. All of our innate preferences, behaviors, etc. feel absolutely true for us. We don't analyze why we feel the way we do. My favorite examples are drinking water (a gender neutral preference) and age (a male specific preference). We all don't like drinking water that's body temperature, we want it to be ice cold. There's no logical reason for us to have this preference. But biologically you should be able to figure…
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:52 AM
-3

Visit the sub r/circumscience/
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:35 AM
13

Have you ever noticed how when out in public, compared to men, women are often less aware of their surroundings, standing in the way of doors, stairs, blocking traffic? I see it on my commute to work and at work, over and over. My theory is that since women evolved mostly living at "home", in the cave or whatever, they didn't develop the need to be aware of what's going on around them. So if these same unaware women were out hunting, they'd be getting pounced on by lions or whatever predators th…
/r/AntiFeminists20/08/23 05:17 PM
1

Being horny all the time. That's pretty much the only thing that I envy women for. Although envy isn't the right word; it's too strong. But it would be nice to be able to turn off the distraction of sexually attractive people.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 05:07 PM
9

The +63 phone code is for the Philippines.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 05:25 PM
25

Some women need to live like they did back in the Victorian age; living with their parents and always having a chaperone when they went out. I browse twoxchromosomes and over and over again I see these posts of women being so stupid and getting themselves into bad situations.
/r/PussyPass19/08/23 02:02 AM
6

https://www.reddit.com/r/therewasanattempt/comments/syl7xd/to_wear_long_eyelashes_on_a_windy_boat_ride/
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/23 01:57 AM
3

What was the gender of the babies?
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:24 PM
5

When a woman does something like this they see it as an extreme aberration. When a man does it they see it as typical, par for the course, no surprise.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:19 PM
10

Articles like these are good for shining a light in corners that may not be well illuminated. Women who read that article are going "Yay!" while the men are going "WTF?!".
/r/MensRights18/08/23 04:36 PM
1

There are some gems on Project Gutenberg, also Faded Page. I've reformatted some to be more logical (whatever that means) and posted them to mobileread.com. For example I loved the Golden West boys series (3 books): https://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=330868 Another one in the western genre that I enjoyed is Bat Wing Bowles: https://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=331866 I discovered the western genre late in life, but I read almost exclusively fantasy. There are some o…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 02:46 AM
2

Sometimes crazy and stupid, or at best (and more often) merely stupid.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 02:26 AM
110

Of course; feminists believe that women aren't capable of falsely accusing a man. They no doubt believe that the patriarchy rescued this footballer.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 02:12 AM
34

The problem with feminism, nowadays, is not about promoting equality but all about trying to discriminate against men. Stupidity is also a big problem, as those two millionaires highlighted. Isn't Australia where there was a cafe that added a surcharge if you weren't female? And it went out of business fairly quickly?
/r/MensRights17/08/23 09:13 PM
4

Every day I download free ebooks from Amazon by using the ereaderiq.com web page. After being aggravated by stories and plots being illogical and that were written by women I've been making sure that the only ebooks I download are written by men. I also don't download free ebooks if the main character is female since the Galbrush Paradox ensures that they'll be shallow and unrealistic. She's right about the majority of books being written by women. But quantity does not equal quality. What reall…
/r/MensRights17/08/23 09:03 PM
12

Not by choice, but because I'm gay. 🤪 When I read about all the crap you straight guys put up with I'm always so glad that I'm gay. On the gay subs sometimes someone will ask what's the best part about being gay and my answer is always not having to deal with women.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:48 PM
2

And they don't understand why it seems so effortless for men to do all that stuff. I take that back; their understanding of why is because, you guessed it, the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 02:19 AM
2

I've got exactly the same DNA as my sister. If that were true wouldn't you both be the same gender? She has two X chromosomes while you have an X and a Y chromosome. Your X chromosome may be the same as one of her X chromosomes but whats in your Y chromosome is not in her other X chromosome.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 12:31 AM
1

Their brains are organised differently,due to DNA the effects of the sex hormones which differentiate our bodies. Why would evolution create dual purpose neurons? We know from anatomy that men's brains are a different size than women's and that men's brains have tissue that women's brains do not. And studies have shown that toddler babies behave and react differently, before their hormones start working. Mammals, and probably the other animals as well, are all born with a well understood gender …
/r/MensRights16/08/23 07:20 PM
1

Reddit is dominated by feminists and simps. When a female posts about a problem she had with a male the only acceptable response is to "support" her. And what u/So-Contribution is very true; I regularly see posts from females where all I can think is "ok, so some totally random stranger got mad at her for no reason whatsoever?" and the comments from the females are all of them completely believing her.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:22 PM
7

I think their problem is that they think with their emotions rather than being analytical and logical. Most (all?) of their brain dead thinking can be attributed to conspiracy theories, but you're giving them too much credit.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:13 PM
1

That guy is a snowflake! /s
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:05 PM
6

He's right of course. But the problem is that the feminists think that all of the so called patriarchal things that they think men are doing aren't due to any innate biological advantages that men have, mentally or physically, but simply due to men maintaining the patriarchy. I.e., they believe that if men stopped perpetuating the so called patriarchy then everyone would be equal. They can't accept the basic fact that men and women are intrinsically different, and blame their problems on society…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 05:01 PM
52

The article is so bad I want to believe it's satire but I doubt it.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 04:51 PM
0

I'm wondering if he was involved in the decision for her to get pregnant. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if he said "no kids" and she went ahead and got pregnant. Also, his lack of enthusiasm for looking for a job seems sketchy. He may be realizing that he should have listened to the MGTOW guys.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 01:51 AM
3

On reddit? Pshaw!
/r/MensRights16/08/23 01:44 AM
4

Our DNA is a double helix, like a twisted ladder. One side is the female X genes and the other the male Y genes. Women's DNA has both sides X genes. Perhaps having half our genes be X allows us to also be good nurturers. I've sometimes (often) felt that men have a lot of overlap, allowing them to be good at both the male and female things, while with the women that's less likely. Yet another thing that may be biologically true but is unfair and will infuriate the feminists.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 01:43 AM
2

There's also the toys preference in babies: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160715114739.htm https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/infa.12352 And monkeys: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13596-male-monkeys-prefer-boys-toys/
/r/MensRights14/08/23 11:16 PM
13

In STEM fields, in my experience at work, and from reading twoxchromosomes, the women are much less likely fit in very well. From my experience it was because the women are less self motivated and less self disciplined, and as much as anything, had less interest in what they were doing, which made them less creative and innovative; it was just a 9 to 5 job and they'd have been just as happy flipping burgers at Jack in the Box. As far as the women being less interested in the work, my favorite ex…
/r/MensRights14/08/23 11:00 PM
2

So when you concede that women on average might be better at multitasking you are doing something “they” would never do. Mea culpa. 😊
/r/MensRights14/08/23 05:18 PM
9

Dixiecrats isn't a good example because back then in the US South you couldn't get elected if you were a Republican (as I understand it, because Lincoln was a Republican). So both conservatives and liberals from the South were Democrats. Party in the South didn't determine whether you were liberal or conservative.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 03:09 AM
1

Unfortunately biology and evolution are inherently sexist. Or probably more correctly they created sexual dimorphism. For sexual dimorphism Wikipedia says "Differences may include secondary sex characteristics, size, weight, color, markings, or behavioral or cognitive traits." Those last two are the relevant ones to this discussion.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 02:55 AM
5

I would assume you're not seriously proposing that men and women have precisely identical psychology in absolutely every respect without exception. I'm sure we'd agree that's obviously wrong, an absurd position to adopt and not worth arguing. The argument that I've seen the psychologists, gender studies people, and feminists put forward is that babies are born with identical brains. As they grow their environment and upbringing creates the differences in psychology according to their sex. This i…
/r/MensRights14/08/23 02:05 AM
10

Googling for "Men's brains are more greedy than women's" brought up this: https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/826083 The abstract of the paper that the article is referring to: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0362119716040101 I don't see where the "greedy" part comes in. I don't have a problem with the idea that women are better at task switching. Considering that when we were evolving the women were at home taking care of the children, cooking, cleaning the cave, etc. and they n…
/r/MensRights14/08/23 01:39 AM
4

When I said the patriarchy I didn't mean it literally, but in the sense that they use the word patriarchy as a catch all to explain that all problems are caused by men. Similar to how misogyny used to mean a hatred of women but they use it to mean anyone who doesn't embrace feminism.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 01:14 AM
0

They're not entirely wrong. Your list is a great example of the so called "patriarchy". The problem is that they brush aside and ignore men's problems. And as has been pointed out repeatedly here, they don't want to hear about the problems of others, only their problems.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 05:10 PM
2

Even now she is trying to put herself first and how his suicide inconvenienced her. Yes, that comes through clearly. So typical and unsurprising.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 05:05 PM
13

It's always the case with feminists that if women aren't enjoying the same benefits as men (e.g., salary in this case) that the patriarchy is behind it. Never mind if they aren't as self motivated, are under performing, etc. Even that is somehow the fault of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 02:38 AM
39

What u/Loud-Mathematician76 said. Our commute train here has separate single user men's and women's restrooms and if there isn't anyone waiting I'll use the women's if the men's is in use. One time I came out and some woman started screeching at me for using the women's; it made me wish I'd left the toilet seat down when I took a piss.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 01:25 AM
62

Journalism today: nothing but quoting stuff from twitter and other sources.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 12:47 AM
2

She's too pretty for them to have expected her to work the hours she was hired and paid for. /s
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/23 07:20 PM
1

There's no way grown fucking adults put "Unbiased" and "Feminist" in the same goddamned sentence. In order to make that sentence true you need to stick one or more words in between "no way" and "grown"; words like intelligent, logical, analytical, and rational. But when talking about feminists it's rarely if ever true to use those words about them.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 05:23 PM
11

There are overwhelmingly many portrayals in tv, movies, and books of women being analytical, logical, and capable. And women doing things that in real life they rarely do; my favorite being in fantasy books the women blacksmiths. Then there are the high percentages of women soldiers, mercenaries, and assassins. I think it reinforces the Standpoint theory that u/phoenician_anarchist brought up. And then when I browse the twoxchromosomes subreddit I see a plethora of examples of women being emotio…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 03:15 AM
36

I love the byline for that site; "Unbiased Journalism from a Feminist Perspective". It's like the KKK having a web site with the byline "Nonracist journalism from a Klu Klux Klan perspective".
/r/MensRights11/08/23 02:57 AM
1

Yes, I agree completely. When I said we breeze through life what I meant is that's how it appears to women.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 05:09 PM
-6

Being a man is much harder than being a women. To be honest, I would disagree with that. What I see is that women are very thin skinned and therefore much more sensitive to many things that we thick skinned men simply brush off. In my perusal of the twox subreddit, day after day I see posts from women demonstrating how emotionally fragile they are. Compared to them we men just breeze through life. And in addition to that they dredge up and remember bad and unhappy experiences from years ago. It …
/r/MensRights08/08/23 07:40 PM
6

Wtf is a man wanting to help a woman a bad thing now? My guess is that when it's unasked for help then it's bad. They interpret it as you're automatically assuming that they're stupid and can't figure something out. (Which could well be true, but you have to wait for them to ask for help.) Similar to my theory about mansplaining, which isn't a guy explaining something to a woman, something that she already knows. But explaining something when she didn't ask for an explanation and merely wants to…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 07:28 PM
-12

That misogynist incel neckbeard tv show narrater/announcer called her a female!
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/23 01:47 AM
5

Animal House.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 03:06 AM
0

That sounds similar to what women do at home. Sweeping with a hand broom.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 02:04 AM
2

This is really it. Evolution dealt them a shitty hand. But as long as they're stuck thinking that males and females are born with identical brains and that everything is learned (and blaming the "patriarchy") they'll never be able to figure out ways to teach girls how to think better.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 09:06 PM
7

Were they sweeping with brooms (hand brooms) or were they driving a street cleaning truck like we use in the US?
/r/MensRights03/08/23 08:37 PM
18

Or brick layers, or plumbers, or auto mechanics. Where I live the trash collectors don't get out of the truck; the trash trucks have a robot arm that picks up the trash can and dumps it inside. Even so, you'll never see a woman driving one of them.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 06:14 PM
2

The same people who've convinced everyone that the Earth is a big ball when it's obviously a flat disc.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:49 PM
1

You never saw the Wizard of Oz? The man behind the curtain.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 08:46 PM
1

Let's generalize the situation. Assume we have a person, A, who is doing something that causes others to react in a way that makes A uncomfortable. There's nothing legally or morally wrong with the behavior of the others who are reacting. There's nothing legally or morally wrong with what A is doing. When asked, A says that they are doing it because it makes them feel good about themself. What's the solution?
/r/MensRights01/08/23 04:56 PM
1

The patriarchy you fool! /s
/r/MensRights01/08/23 04:48 PM
2

In a way it shouldn't be surprising. First, historically humans have believed that we're not like the lower animals and don't have instincts because we believe that everything we know is learned. Second, once you believe that males and females have different brains and ways of thinking it opens the door (Pandora's box) to thinking like the Victorians viewed the differences between how men and women thought and acted. And there have been posts here about how if researchers try and investigate the…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 04:48 PM
1

I couldn't stop laughing at her. "Hopping mad"; too funny.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/23 05:11 PM
1

There is also a significant percentage of married women who don't contribute their income to the living expenses because they say "that's his responsibility." I was surprised when I discovered this since in my family my parents had a shared checking account and both paychecks went into it.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 04:03 PM
8

I've often said things about how much more emotional and emotionally fragile women typically are; it's rather obvious from my daily perusal of twoxchromosomes. Maybe when someone is more emotional it makes them more vocal and upset about pain. Maybe they really are more sensitive to pain. Their complaints about their pain being ignored they make equally about their female doctors as well as their male doctors. Their female OBGYNs are just as "heartless" as their male doctors. My seat of the pant…
/r/MensRights27/07/23 04:42 AM
3

https://archive.vn/ezs8j
/r/MensRights27/07/23 04:32 AM
16

I feel sorry for men who need validation from women.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 02:48 AM
1

DNA. Women are pre-programmed by evolution to see men as the providers and protectors. It translates into a lot of their behaviors and attitudes, like this.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:12 PM
3

Media; TV, movies, etc. Half of the world's population is female so it's profitable for the media to appeal to them. It's a good example of going after the low hanging fruit. See also the Galbrush Paradox.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:03 PM
9

What So-Contribution said about short term outcomes is a major factor. My belief is that they are severely lacking in analytical skills and it's more natural for them to think with their emotions.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:01 PM
4

The thing that's always overlooked in these scenarios is how these women are dressed. Invariably they're dressed in a way that sends the message that they're thirsty for attention.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 04:20 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/ThatsInsane/comments/u0jd73/thatsinsane/
/r/MensRights25/07/23 06:01 AM
54

Stephanie believes that because her workplace is predominantly female, it's assumed the women will just muck in, in a way men would never be expected to. I remember way back when I was in the Navy, in the 1970s, one of my shop mates complaining about the married guys getting lots of time off with their excuse being "my wife ...", or "my kids ...". (In the military you don't just work 8 hours a day, you work for as long as it takes to do whatever needs to be done.) It's not just women coworkers t…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 02:14 AM
1

Every feminist knows that the bottom one is obviously depicting a neckbeard incel. And u/RockmanXX is right. I'm not on a government pension but something pretty much the same. And damn, it's nice.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 06:20 PM
2

How could anyone take complaints about "women's bodies being routinely sexualized" seriously in this age And maybe they wouldn't be routinely sexualized if they didn't routinely dress in a way that screams "Look at me! I'm so sexy!"
/r/MensRights21/07/23 06:17 PM
5

I'm shocked that the DailyMail would publish such an anti-misandrist review.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 06:13 PM
1

Agreed, very good article. Although I think he'd probably gotten even more votes from the women on feelings if he used something along the lines of "family and friends and feelings" rather than just feelings. When taking the train to work five days a week, whenever there were two or more women talking, no men in their group, it was always talk about people.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 06:02 PM
1

This guy's article pretty much hit the nail on the head. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/155czz3/why_mansplaining_might_not_be_what_you_think_it/
/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:54 PM
3

The usual (and "official" according to google) definition I've seen from feminists and women is that mansplaining is when a man explains something to a woman that she already knows, and as icing on the cake, explains it in a condescending manner. How a man is supposed to know everything that a woman knows and thus avoid explaining something she already knows is anyone's guess. My experience is that women invariably aren't interested in an explanation of something when it's technical. So that get…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:40 PM
6

When someone is hateful toward women on this sub, that behavior gets scolded and often times their comments are even removed. I certainly agree with you. But I think that the problem for the women is that the bar is much much lower for posts they consider misogynistic. I collect some of the more bizarre posts on twox and one of the things I've noticed in my perusal of that sub is how incredibly emotionally fragile they are, especially about criticisms. I have no doubt whatsoever that they consid…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 04:55 PM
3

There's a saying, "you can choose your friends but not your family" but that doesn't mean you have to suffer willingly from a family member.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 01:42 AM
1

It's too hot here. And I'm guessing you're seeing this around stores and in shopping centers; hot weather doesn't stop some people from shopping.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 12:55 AM
8

If feminism is so important and powerful, if women are so much smarter and don’t need men, and there’s more of them statistically, then why the fuck aren’t they in charge everywhere and paying themselves more money than men? Why would they even need any men to support their movement? Apparently you haven't heard about the all-powerful patriarchy. All women's problems are caused by the patriarchy. /s
/r/MensRights20/07/23 12:52 AM
1

The subreddit twoxchromosomes.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:45 AM
6

Yeah, after I wrote my response up there I realized that she's simply doing the same thing, writing outlandish stuff to get clicks.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:43 AM
3

The best part of these dailymail articles is the femail column on the right.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 09:58 PM
1

Which would be good because then they're smashing the patriarchy. /s
/r/MensRights18/07/23 07:29 PM
2

Reminds me of back when the gluten free craze got going. Prior to that the Celiac disease entry on wikipedia looks similar to how it is now but during the gluten free craze the gluten free crowd had the celiac disease page redirected to their page, which was obviously written by emotional people.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 07:25 PM
13

I haven't been following this and remembered seeing post titles about it in twox and wondered what their take on it was. I searched twox for "Jonah Hill" and got 6 or 8 or whatever matches. It's disturbing to see how someone gave responses there that Hill's texts were basically "this isn't working for me, let's part ways" and then the women would down vote those comments, and no dagger that reddit shows me when it's a controversial response (a combination of up and down votes). My daily twox per…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 06:27 PM
59

I couldn't finish the article. The whole rant about Musk wanting to fight Zuckerberg in a cage match was hilarious. Apparently she's completely unaware that people tweet bizarre and stupid stuff just to get clicks and upvotes. And the best part is that this obviously off the wall tweet by Musk is making girls depressed. Too funny. And we are wondering why girls are depressed? Listening to these men who head up companies that influence millions – in Zuckerberg’s case billions - of lives and livel…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 05:52 PM
4

I didn't read the Stanford paper but nowadays my impression is that women have substituted the words sexual assault for rape. And what they consider constitutes sexual assault is very broad.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 09:32 PM
8

It's also our fault that 80% of divorces are initiated by women. "Our" as in our patriarchy. /s
/r/MensRights16/07/23 10:42 PM
2

But don't throw away the fact that men outperform women when it comes to being the very best at something. It ought to be a source of pride for our sex that we we're the ones leading human progress in most areas. It is not something women could have just replicated were they on their own. Unfortunately this is the part that feminists will never accept.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 07:44 PM
3

Capitalism really is the best explanation for it, not "men" not "gynocentrism". And I would argue that evolution is the best explanation. Evolution has given men brains that are more likely to use analysis and logic, less likely to be emotionally fragile, and so on. The roles that RProgrammerMan outlined are the result of evolution. No one can say that evolution and survival of the fittest is fair.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 07:39 PM
61

Hmpf. Next you'll be telling us that the Earth isn't flat!
/r/MensRights16/07/23 03:55 AM
14

I didn't finish it. It's very long. It's written by a woman. From what I gather the entire point of that long tedious article is that it's merely the same old, same old, nothing new, deja vu, we've seen it all before, and obviously not anything anyone should be concerned about.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 02:27 AM
4

Because women find those news stories absolutely riveting and irresistible. That means that about half of the population will almost always click on those stories. Since reporting news is about making money it's a smart move on their part. Who can forget the Gabby Petito and Brian Laundrie case? That should have been minimally interesting to the general public and primarily of interest to their families and friends.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 04:26 PM
1

Same here.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 04:17 PM
35

It appears to be systemic misogyny to them because men are in most of the important and powerful positions and well paid because men work hard and learn and understand stuff. To them it looks like men have it easy; ergo, misogyny and the patriarchy must be the reason.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 01:51 AM
12

They can't even handle the physically easy stuff like software development. Go on youtube and look for tutorials for programming, electronics, etc. and it's 99% men. Look on github for free open source software and again, 99% men. They could do that stuff but they find it uninteresting or whatever and don't like doing it; it's like asking them to shovel a ton of pig shit with a teaspoon.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 01:44 AM
3

https://archive.ph/YlOZ8 https://archive.ph/UU6TH https://archive.ph/7T1m6 https://archive.ph/ckR4Q https://archive.ph/jKzeu https://archive.ph/xp6pi
/r/MensRights14/07/23 01:33 AM
1

The standard definition for mansplaining is a man explaining something to a woman, something that she already knows. And typically they'll say that he explained it in a condescending manner. But my experience is that when women ask about something, e.g., something not working right or as expected, they don't want to know why, just what to do to make it work. But we men always like to understand the why of things and as a result annoy women with that "useless" and "irrelevant" information.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 10:12 PM
1

Another one that I found interesting is the word maid. It used to mean an unmarried woman.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 04:52 PM
4

Because men get things done. When something needs to be done or needs fixing we roll up our sleeves and get to work. Women typically need to talk about it and discuss it with others, and importantly, often expect others to help them deal with stuff. And given that they typically don't think analytically and logically they're more likely to make mistakes. (One of my favorite types of posts on twox is women getting themselves into a mess because they didn't think.) They don't understand that we ha…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 02:14 AM
6

You guys are harsh. Sometimes they're just looking for answers to life's important questions. https://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/14xque9/help_me_dye_my_armpit_hair/ /s
/r/MensRights13/07/23 01:38 AM
7

One of the funniest posts on this sub. That guy was too funny in his replies to various comments; for example, his response to orussell03.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 06:29 PM
2

and the ragebaiting they use to get people to tune in. News is a business, so they do whatever they can to grab eyeballs. I get annoyed when people believe that the news providers' job is to keep us informed about what's important; no, their job is to be profitable.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 06:22 PM
4

As long as the articles are written by women I'd say it's unlikely that there will be any meaningful change. Women's brains are wired to see men as the solution providers. And a major underpinning of feminist ideology is that all of their problems are caused by the so called patriarchy.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 09:27 PM
51

There was a post recently on twoxchromosomes implying or stating that all male Uber drivers are likely to sexually assault female riders. If I were an Uber driver I would allay their fears by refusing to provide rides when they're all or only female. There are probably more male Uber drivers than female so this would also demonstrate how women depend on men to get things done.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 06:24 PM
3

However, this is a huge misconception, because in the scenario where there are too few men and too many women, the society in-question will not get to use those women for reproduction. Neighbouring societies will conquer that society and those women will be used to grow other societies, not yours. Evolution favors the perpetuation of the species, not the perpetuation of the society except perhaps as a side effect.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 06:18 PM
8

I don't say this in order to excuse their behavior but I can't help but think that, yet again, this problematic behavior/attitude is due to Mother Nature, aka evolution. It manifests itself in so many ways.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 06:12 PM
1

Female characters, regardless of whether or not they are a superhero or the main character, will always be dull due to the Galbrush Paradox
/r/MensRights09/07/23 04:10 PM
2

And when they do cover men's problems, feminists tend to oversimplify them, blame things completely outside of feminism for those issues, and react defensively at the mere suggestion that some actions or policies promoted by feminism might have harmed men in general, even if accidentally so. ... Another problem they have is their insistence of treating men and women's macro dynamics as an "oppressor vs oppressed" issue. This inevitably causes feminists to apply double standards whether they do i…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 08:40 PM
2

I've wondered how much is just due to biology. I have no doubt that it is; I'd make the usual argument that it's due to evolution and in our DNA. From working with and being around women it's clear to me that most women place a lot of importance on having kids. I think that an innate value that evolution has given us is what our fundamental species' role is. For men it's being the provider, and for women it's being the mother. I also think that this is a big factor in why men do better in the wo…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 10:24 PM
1

I think that to a large extent this is yet another evolutionary / DNA thing. Women are much more aware and concerned about the home being tidy and clean. For most men it's just not on our radar. So it's not weaponized, it's merely innate. Similar to how women are typically unable to or disinclined to understand technical things. We could call that women's weaponized incompetence.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 06:12 PM
2

Of course it depends on where you work. I worked in an office at a liberal university and the women could wear whatever they wanted, and the same with the men.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 06:06 PM
31

The author is female. All of the people she quotes are female. Is anyone surprised at the article's conclusions?
/r/MensRights06/07/23 05:59 PM
12

Rather than say they have fragile egos I would say that they are emotionally fragile, which includes fragile egos. I see it regularly on twoxchromosomes; women crying about something that we would find aggravating. My favorite being one where the title or first sentence was "I cried all day!" because the hairdresser cut off too much hair. There are also regular posts of women being concerned about their appearance. One of the weirder ones was titled "My friends brother committed suicide. How/sho…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 06:33 PM
1

Not just birthing them but also feeding and raising them. The men's job was to be the provider, bringing home the bacon, and being the defender.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 06:54 AM
1

That's very true. But there's a but. I lived with my grandmother for 2 years and her second husband (not my biological grandfather) was totally subservient and dependent upon her; he couldn't take a shit without getting running it by her. At the time I was repulsed with his subservience. But years later I realized that he was completely happy with it. Some men's brains are wired to be subservient. Just because I couldn't live like that doesn't mean everyone else has to as well. One obvious probl…
/r/MensRights01/07/23 03:28 PM
3

It's easier for them to think with their emotions and let them run away with them.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 02:26 AM
2

Not genocide but imagine if there was some drug or surgical procedure that made men completely compliant and subservient to women. So then the men could still do the work that's dirty and requires strength. The trick would be for the drug or surgical procedure to not also dull their intellect so that they could still create, design, and invent. Sounds like a science fiction book, sort of an inverse of The Handmaid's Tale book.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 06:22 AM
15

And "thinking" with their emotions.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 05:02 AM
3

A footnote to my post above. Way back in the 1970s during the Gloria Steinem, National Organization of Women, and Ms. magazine days the feminists understood the problem of dressing sexy and encouraged women to dress down so that they were less likely to be regarded as sex objects. What was "interesting" about it was their reasoning as to why women were dressing sexy; they believed that men (you know, the "patriarchy", although I never heard that term back then) were making them. Even these days …
/r/MensRights28/06/23 02:34 AM
4

What you and 63daddy say is in agreement with how I see it. I see most, if not all, of women's problems through the lens of evolutionary psychology. For example, men innately see an 18 year old girl as more sexually attractive than a 40 year old woman. It's easy to explain how that came about, i.e., why those neurons are in our brains, due to evolution. There's no conscious thinking involved, we're just turned on by younger women. The complementary, flip side of the coin behavior with women is w…
/r/MensRights28/06/23 02:13 AM
2

That sub seems to be moribund.
/r/MensRights26/06/23 07:55 AM
9

Exactly. This to me is the bedrock of why women will never get ahead. To me it's clear they were dealt a poor hand by Mother Nature (aka evolution) but for them to sit around and whine that all their problems are caused by the patriarchy isn't doing anything useful or helpful. (It's what my grandfather would call pissing into the wind, but that analogy only works for men.)
/r/MensRights26/06/23 07:49 AM
2

https://archive.vn/bPwMj
/r/MensRights25/06/23 04:45 PM
1

Yeah, I was in the Navy back in the 1970s and it was great.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 04:43 PM
3

Women. The majority of writers are women. Women love to use the latest slang, terminology, and acronyms; they think it makes them sound smart.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 07:27 AM
7

One of the major downsides of the internet has been online dating. There are similar complaints in the gay community, but at least there guys are more willing to have one night stands (and not even spend the night, just fuck 'em and forget 'em).
/r/MensRights25/06/23 05:22 AM
5

It's a boon for the ones who have kids. I have a family next door, mother, father, and little boy, and the wife's car is often in the driveway during the day. The boy is going to a nearby school; 4th grade or somesuch. I didn't know anything about them and assumed that she wasn't working but a few days ago she was telling me that she's continuing to work from home even after the covid thing. We were both going, "Wow, so lucky."
/r/MensRights25/06/23 05:17 AM
4

True. It seems large to me because I don't go to movies or watch tv and I spend several hours every day reading books. Women writing gay fiction is one of my peeves. I've even gotten so bad that I won't read anything by an author who I haven't read anything by before if they're female. Surprisingly, even only downloading male authors I still download more daily freebies than I can keep up with.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 05:08 AM
3

I suppose if you're straight it seems inconsequential.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 02:37 AM
5

Thanks. I'm too old to keep up with all of the latest slang.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 02:22 AM
8

Fujoshi are extremely uncommon From what I've seen it seems to be quite common. My local library has a 987 LGBTQIA books in ebook format. When I started going through them I would say that at least 90 to 95 percent of the ones about two gay guys are written by women and they're simply low quality, shallow, low effort romances. Likewise, I keep a pinned tab at ereaderiq.com with a filter for LGBTQIA books, today's free ebooks, and there the percentage for gay males written by women is even higher…
/r/MensRights25/06/23 02:18 AM
3

The problem begins when fujoshi starts to ship two male friends in fiction as boyfriends. I don't understand what you mean by "ship". Do you mean "see" or "consider"?
/r/MensRights25/06/23 01:56 AM
2

If they had instead used the term sexually attractive rather than the vague term romantic interest I'd probably agree with it. Men's libido is clearly visually stimulated by an attractive person. When it comes to a long term relationship and marriage I don't think it's as simple.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 06:20 PM
4

She said "she's got a lot going on" and The court heard how Mayo had a difficult family life and her father, who was terminally ill at the time Stanley was born and died shortly after, made her feel "worthless". ... In her testimony, Mayo described how she started having sex at 13 and used it as a way to get people to like her because she was "insecure" due to her family situation. ... Experts disagreed about her state of mind, with one of the opinion she had "created a false memory" while anoth…
/r/MensRights23/06/23 06:10 PM
11

Nuala Fitzpatrick says the cost of living has had a "massive impact" on her life. Caption on a picture of a woman who appears to have plenty of money to spend on makeup.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 05:53 PM
5

Humans have an innate value that men are the providers, and women have an innate value that tells them that they can depend on men. We don't analyze and think about these innate preferences, values, and things. It sounds to me like this value that women can depend on men gets magnified in some women's minds. To the point of distorting what ought to be rational behavior.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 03:33 AM
28

It never dawns on them some men being in positions of power because they actually earned it and fought for it, and weren't merely given it due to gender. That would require them to use logical analysis.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 03:21 AM
18

I'd be willing to bet that Leah Hampton doesn't know what a quadratic equation is or what it's used for. And the "knitting patterns = computer coding" really underlines how ignorant she is. I taught myself how to knit from books, before the internet, and years later took it up again. What was forever annoying is how patterns for each object had to be spelled out row by row, stitch by stitch. Rarely if ever a generalized template that you could modify to make it bigger (for example, socks; I have…
/r/AntiFeminists20/06/23 03:08 AM
2

It's important to understand the difference between what's important and what's valuable with respect to jobs. We can measure the value of a job simply by how much the person doing it is paid. For example, professional athletes are valuable because they are highly paid. But obviously humanity could continue on without them so they aren't important to our survival. It's a high value job because finding replacements isn't easy; good professional athletes aren't commonplace. On the other hand raisi…
/r/MensRights17/06/23 07:43 PM
-14

It's like that movie where Bruce Willis You ruined that movie for anyone who hasn't seen it. Better to have said "It's like that movie with Bruce Willis and the little boy who sees ghosts."
/r/MensRights16/06/23 06:16 PM
3

I would argue that men are privileged but not in the societal way that 63daddy explains it, but our privileges are biological and come from Mother Nature, aka evolution. For example, we're much more likely to solve problems using logic and analysis, rather than emotions, we're much more likely to enjoy learning technical stuff, why things work the way that they do, etc.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 05:26 AM
3

Wasn't there a post earlier today with a Joe Rogan video where he says that plastics are the cause? Oops, my mistake; the title of the post was "Plastics are shrinking your balls and reducing your sperm- Joe Rogan". But maybe we can conflate these and say the shrinking nads and reduced sperm count are what's causing the mtf transitions.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 04:20 AM
9

They will perform better or worst on certain fields in average, and this is not a sexist opinion, but biological facts. Very true but the feminists will excoriate you for saying that and say that only misogynists believe that.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 04:11 AM
1

I'm an athiest but I understand that slant on the meaning. Dictionary.com says "1. a person who abstains from sexual relations." and "2. a person who remains unmarried, especially for religious reasons." Oxford says "abstaining from marriage and sexual relations, typically for religious reasons." Also keep in mind the term incel, which means involuntary celibate, which I've understood from the feminists to mean guys who can't get girls to date and/or have sex with them.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 03:53 AM
1

I don't know if it's still the case but a few years ago they also still allowed smoking in the casinos. Considering all the taxes they collect from the casinos and that there's basically no other businesses there it's easy to see why they bend over backwards to help them.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:33 PM
2

Celibate means not having sex (with another person). You can still be celibate and masturbate. Perhaps if you also didn't masturbate you'd be abstinent as well. I went celibate back in the 1980s when gay guys were dying like flies from AIDS. I've never removed the shroud of celibacy and luckily am perfectly happy.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:29 PM
3

I'm like superpowder. In my teens and 20s I supported women's liberation. I am still a liberal and vote Democrat but my views on women's liberation has dramatically changed. Mostly it's probably due to working with them and seeing how intellectually "unperformant" and emotional they are and then they complain about sexism. As for why gays support feminists, I would guess that it's mostly because the vast majority of gays are left wing and it's the usual herd mentality. Nothing really complicated…
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:24 PM
0

At first I thought that it was an issue of aesthetics, that they unconsciously recognized that circumcised dicks look better. Later I realized that even though that's a part of it, there's also the issue of oral sex; who wants to suck an uncircumcised dick? It's nasty under the foreskin. The uncircumcised guys then jump in and say that it's simply a matter of hygiene; that you clean under the foreskin when you take your shower. (They also claim that there are guys who are circumcised who don't k…
/r/MensRights14/06/23 09:57 PM
1

I have never met anyone who was uncut that regrets it. I'm guessing you meant cut, not uncut.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 09:48 PM
-1

What I find so weird about the intactivists is how emotional they are.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 08:42 PM
1

in my own personal experience everyone who is cut is happy they are. ... Again, in my experience, girls prefer cut guys and I always felt the uncut were subconsciously jealous. Exactly. For more information see also the following subreddits circumscience DebunkingIntactivism Foreskin_Grief
/r/MensRights14/06/23 04:28 PM
-13

But how many of the responses will be from guys who are uncut and claim to be cut and wish they weren't?
/r/MensRights13/06/23 09:31 PM
83

If you go out to dinner with friends you split the bill. Why should a date with a stranger be any different? Just because it's a "date" the guy is supposed to pay the bill? If she expects the guy to pay for the meal then to me that would be a red flag. There should also not be any expectations on the guy's part that there will be sex afterwards, regardless of whether you split the bill or not.
/r/MensRights10/06/23 03:26 AM
3

I suppose the argument there would be "maybe they're contributing anonymously or with fake names to avoid harassment". Yep, they always have some convenient excuse. I worked as a programmer/software developer and a server system administrator. We had some women but what was very obvious is how the guys were inherently interested in the computer stuff but for the women it may as well have been a 9 to 5 job in a factory on an assembly line, or doing accounting/payroll.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 11:14 PM
1

Back in high school I remember reading about how animals will naturally limit their population when food and resources become scarce especially when they're overpopulated. For example the lemmings marching off a cliff. I've often wondered if this is happening or could happen with humans.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 09:16 PM
2

Agreed. Global warming is a red herring as far as I'm concerned; it's a side effect and byproduct of overpopulation.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 09:13 PM
2

My favorite example of women's disinclination to do well and be active in STEM fields is free open source software (FOSS). You can look at tons of it on github and sourceforge, or look at the list of contributors to any of the linux distributions, or the youtube tutorials for Blender 3d, and the percentage of women is microscopic. There's nothing preventing anyone from creating FOSS; the language compilers / interpreters are free, the editors / IDEs are free, github and sourceforge are free, so …
/r/MensRights09/06/23 09:07 PM
2

I'm always ranting about evolutionary psychology having given women different ways of thinking and problem solving, that is, being less likely (much less likely) to think analytically, being more emotional, etc. compared to men. There's also the evidence that women aren't as interested in technical stuff and therefore are unlikely to do as well in in technical fields. All of the things where men succeed more often compared to women, positions of power, etc. I'd say are due to men having more per…
/r/MensRights08/06/23 07:17 PM
1

"It was meant in jest, but I understand how it might have offended some." Convenient excuse, the old "it was a joke!"
/r/MensRights07/06/23 06:05 PM
2

Sounds to me like because she's hot you're thinking more with your dick rather than your brain.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 05:13 PM
1

Sounds to me like because she's hot you're thinking more with your dick rather than your brain.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 05:13 PM
159

The real reason is given in the article: Ms Robinson argued a “corrosive atmosphere” of misogyny could be linked to young women killing themselves as she warned “it is not a level playing field for women”. Of course it's men's fault. How could it be otherwise? /s
/r/MensRights06/06/23 03:03 AM
-29

Yeah, they need to learn to enjoy the taste of smegma. /s
/r/MensRights06/06/23 02:58 AM
1

Who knows? But I wouldn't be at all surprised if they're trying to think of something.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 09:01 PM
0

I'm wondering if/when the feminists will cook up something against the woman who does Just Pearly Things.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 07:15 PM
2

Why do people still reject this reality and act so surprised that men are attracted to exposure of female flesh? ... Do women not reason that choosing to cover their flesh will lead to less approaches for sex or are they adamantly prepared to do whatever they like, regardless of the consequences? That's cutting off your nose to spite your face. My answer to both questions is the usual, that compared to men, women are strongly disinclined to use logical analysis. When I'm reading posts on twox, I…
/r/MensRights04/06/23 04:27 AM
34

Because of the Galbrush Paradox the female characters are required to be dull.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 09:49 PM
6

That's a part of why I read twox; the stuff I regularly see there is really bizarre. I even made my own sub where I crosspost the more bizarre ones..
/r/MensRights03/06/23 09:41 PM
1

Of course; you're a woman.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 09:32 PM
15

Frankly it stretches the bounds of credibility and makes it very difficult to believe that any of this is even remotely real. But in their minds it's very real.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 09:26 PM
1

I know the whole judging people for how they dress thing is controversial Only for women. If women dressed like this instead of this it would cut down on 99% of the "creepy guys" unwanted comments. (The headscarves aren't necessary.)
/r/MensRights03/06/23 09:20 PM
6

And of course she's doing the thing that they do best: whining.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/06/23 08:09 PM
354

I noticed this back in my 40s when I was talking to a mother and when describing how wonderful her husband was her list of wonderful qualities were all things he did that made himself useful and helpful. Nothing about him as a person or how they had the same interests, etc. She could have been describing the gardener and how great he was keeping the grass green and the roses pruned. I was very surprised. But I've heard this way of wives describing their husbands again and again.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 05:27 PM
1

OP maybe wasn't around when the FemaleDatingStrategy sub was active. Sharing the cost of a meal is small beans compared to what the women there expected. I miss that sub; it was the epitome of unreal female expectations.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 04:51 AM
2

It would be helpful to list those 3 legal rights for those of us with poor memories or who don't know about them.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 03:09 AM
1

(Strap on dildos.)
/r/MensRights30/05/23 03:07 AM
0

As a result of evolutionary psychology there are mental situations that put women at a disadvantage. Mother Nature dealt them a poor hand intellectually. Compared to men, women are unlikely to do well at mentally stressful and demanding situations and jobs. Likewise, women are unlikely to do as well at technical jobs compared to men; e.g., computer programming, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, etc. They can do those jobs, but unlike men they don't find them interesting and satisfy…
/r/MensRights30/05/23 03:03 AM
1

Yep.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 12:53 AM
1

You're probably right. But age is also often a factor; I read somewhere that companies would rather hire young guys than old guys. Young guys are seen as being more eager beavers compared to old guys.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 05:13 PM
3

When you say that then they tell you that you're a rape apologist. They have such an amazing lack of logic.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 08:11 AM
2

I think women know they are torturing men when they dress with less clothing. Then, of course, they are told this is okay. It's what the consider to be fashionable by their standards, I suppose? With my thinking it's my standard rant; it's innate behavior due to evolution (evolutionary psychology). Evolution made men prefer young hot women in order for their genes to be more likely to get passed on. Likewise, evolution made women want to be attractive to men so that their genes get passed on. Me…
/r/MensRights25/05/23 07:56 AM
2

It happens but not intentionally. I used to read r/BigDickProblems and every so often a guy would post about how he was wearing slacks and has a naturally big softie and his dick outline could be seen when sitting. And of course some woman would complain and HR would have to talk to him about appropriate attire.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 02:53 AM
2

Being an old timer it's interesting to me that during the early 1970s I think it was that feminists were pushing for women to dress down (i.e., modestly) and understood that sexy clothes encouraged sexualization. But at that time what I didn't catch on to is that the reason they gave for women dressing in sexy clothes is because "men were forcing them to" (I have no idea how). And today's feminists say the same thing, although they now use the word patriarchy.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 02:47 AM
5

I was going to make a remark about how I find it amusing that they refer to these overtly sexualized clothes as cute but you made it perfect by prefixing it with one of their favorite words, super.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 02:42 AM
2

Imagine a guy going out wearing nothing but a leather jockstrap. (Although you can see that in the Castro (gay) district in San Francisco.)
/r/MensRights25/05/23 02:36 AM
1

An auto parts store is typically an all male place. By hiring a woman they demonstrate that they are "supporting equality." Same thing with an auto dealer's service department; all of the mechanics are men but they have some women doing the checking you in job to show how they "support equality."
/r/MensRights23/05/23 04:56 PM
-2

Of course those men that are creepy to young women are wrong Yes, but I would have no reservations betting that in 99.9% of these cases the women are dressed in sexy clothes that scream "look at how hot I am!". For example, compare this to this.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 02:28 AM
25

Yes, I see this all the time on twox. I try and avoid reading the comments and only read the OP but when I do read the comments the in-group bias is there in spades. Women are perfectly willing to defend another woman who's in a conflict with a man, even against evidence. This is also constantly in evidence there. My impression is that when a woman posts about a problem, even if she's asking for help understanding what happened, what she really wants is affirmation from the other women that the …
/r/MensRights23/05/23 01:53 AM
6

Money over looks is definitely the case when they're looking for a long term relationship / husband. Basic evolution at work; a successful provider improves the likelihood of her genes surviving. Similarly for men preferring young women over older women; younger women are more likely to live long enough to raise the offspring to adulthood. But for hookups it's the Chads who win.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 07:37 PM
3

What a weird take on why someone's gay. You're gay because you're attracted to your sex. Likewise you're straight because you're attracted to the opposite sex. One isn't gay because they find women sexually unattractive or straight because they find their own gender sexually unattractive. On the other hand, sometimes the question comes up on askgaybros "what's the best part about being gay" and my answer is always not having to deal with women.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 06:23 PM
6

https://archive.vn/XhglF
/r/MensRights22/05/23 06:00 PM
12

Journalism is dominated by women. So it's not surprising that their coverage is skewed.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 02:46 AM
1

In their minds it's always been about equality. The problem is that they don't understand why men are the movers and shakers, the ones with the power. They believe that there's some secret mysterious nefarious patriarchy that's holding them back, when it's their own behaviors that are restricting them.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 04:07 PM
7

It's about suppressing/controlling male sexuality and giving women all the power. Isn't this also true with the Healthy At Any Size movement with corpulent women asserting that society should regard them being just as attractive as women of correct weight?
/r/MensRights20/05/23 05:25 PM
1

I also feel like they're often trying to compete with men, trying to show that they can like the same things that men do. Being sexually active and having a high body count for example. My favorite example is women going to baseball games where when it's two women they never watch the game and spend the entire time talking.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 04:25 AM
6

I don't watch tv and rarely go to movies these days so I don't know anything about those shows you mentioned. I'm a voracious book reader and download many books by way of ereaderiq.com. I have a browser tab pinned for ereaderiq.com filtering for lgbt+ and I would say well over, very well over, 90% of the books there are written by women. The overwhelming majority (99.9%) are crappy garbage. I recently ranted about it in the following thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/askgaybros/comments/13hrvjb/…
/r/MensRights15/05/23 10:07 PM
15

A non-masculine approach = men are stupid and only women are capable of understanding these things. Next question? /s
/r/MensRights15/05/23 05:39 PM
1

She may not be explicitly or aggressively for men's rights but any time someone has an agenda that's pointing out the fallacies in today's feminism is a positive in my book.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 04:55 PM
-10

I have always been very thankful that I'm circumcised. And always will be.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:12 AM
13

I use it as a regular reminder of how off the rails they are. Emotionally fragile, very unlikely to analyze things, never accepting responsibility for their actions, and the usual, blaming men for all of their problems.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 09:32 PM
85

Those lips. According to a site that does lip fillers, "Pursuing your wants and desires for your body can be empowering."
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/23 03:30 AM
-6

Biden manipulated you apparently. He doesn't need to. I always vote Democrat. As a friend once said, "The worst Democrat is always better than the best Republican." 🤪 Some Republican stuff I agree with but most I don't so the Democrats are the lesser of two evils for me.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 04:32 PM
-2

He put up no defense. He's not the sharpest knife in the drawer. But he sure knows how to manipulate conservative voters.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:51 PM
5

Psychology Today; the apex of psychology facts. /s
/r/MensRights10/05/23 02:25 AM
1

I hated those bathroom sinks where it was a bowl set on the counter. I wouldn't be surprised if some feminist has done a video saying how they are for men and not women.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 01:29 AM
4

This is the reason I browse the twox sub; it's a reminder of how different their thinking is. No accountability, emotionally fragile, unable to analyze problems, etc. And the cherry on top is that, of course, their problems are all due to the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 03:08 PM
6

Because of the galbrush paradox I almost don't mind the male character being presented in a less favorable light (they are then more interesting). What bugs me though is when the story also has a woman who is the brains, who isn't emotional, who thinks analytically, is logical, etc, and that without her everything would be a hopeless mess. In my experience it's been almost always the opposite; level-headed, analytical, and logical women are very rare.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:34 AM
2

Harsh. (But completely true.) 🤪
/r/MensRights07/05/23 06:40 PM
0

I agree. I was thinking that maybe schools could use some form of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to teach the girls to not give in to their emotions and to be more analytical. But then I had the scary thought that since schools are predominately run by women they would likely also use CBT to psychologically castrate and emasculate the boys. It's a very distasteful idea but what if we need to realize that Mother Nature (aka evolution) dealt women a poorer hand compared to men, intellectually …
/r/MensRights07/05/23 06:37 PM
0

Heh. Reminds me of the old lawyer joke; Q: how can you tell when a lawyer is lying? A: when his lips are moving.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 06:26 PM
2

Likely because of wide gaps in their education and/or intelligence. My answer is not education and intelligence but rather a disinclination to use analysis. Thinking with their emotions and asking others is more natural and automatic for them than using analysis. See also this which was linked to in this post.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 06:10 PM
23

One of my evolutionary psychology pet theories about innate behaviors that men and women have is our goal or role in life. (In other words, it's preprogrammed in our brains by evolution.) Namely, that men's preprogrammed role is to be a provider. For women it's to be a mother. Women may more easily dodge the desire to be a mother but they still don't have as strong of a drive compared to men to excel at their career. With men their career is a part of their identity. With women their identity is…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 06:48 AM
4

Far fewer is bs. No doubt. I'd guess that it's the "nurture over nature" preference. It's as if he wants to believe it's far fewer and that society is changing how we behave, but damn, the numbers say otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:32 AM
12

We can certainly lament the degree to which dating markets still reflect the notion that men have to provide while women don’t - it’s a kind of regressive attitude far fewer people still explicitly hold than they once did - but that expectation remains a reality. ... So career women are faced with a growing structural disadvantage of insufficient suitable partners, which is exacerbated as they age because of men’s continuing preference for younger women. Two excellent examples of innate behavior…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:22 AM
11

Agreed. Isn't there some saying like "things have to get worse before they'll get better"?
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:43 AM
11

I love the bags of kitty litter for the score. I'm guessing it's as much tongue-in-cheek as it is making a point, and of course the "females" won't get the humor.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 01:22 AM
3

my dad worked for a police department whose pension system did not include SS I wonder if that's true. He may have elected to not use SS. I say that because where I worked, at a state university, in the 1980s I think it was, I remember someone from HR asking me if I wanted to continue contributing to SS. I said of course, not knowing how good their pension plan was and thinking how else would I survive when I retired. In addition to that, we could also contribute to a 403-b, which is for non-pro…
/r/MensRights04/05/23 08:09 PM
25

This comes up chronically on twox. Even when their doctors and nurses are women they claim that the medical community is ignoring their greater pain. And of course in their minds it's yet another example of the patriarchy screwing them over for no logical reason. To me it's yet another example of evolution with men being emotionally stronger and not bursting into tears at the first sign of pain and difficulty. On a similar topic, one of the repeated posts on twox that shows how emotionally fragi…
/r/MensRights04/05/23 06:44 PM
11

If I remember correctly, the spouse, for example the wife, can collect Social Security using their husband's Social Security Number even if the wife never worked. I'm guessing she can't do this before he dies. If both the husband and wife worked and the wife had a minimum wage job and the husband earned piles of money, when they both retire the wife's Social Security check will be much smaller than his. But when the husband dies she can then switch and collect the higher Social Security payments…
/r/MensRights04/05/23 04:27 PM
8

I agree completely. The frustrating thing to me is that so many here and elsewhere don't understand that these things are innate and are a product of our evolution. Another thing that adds to their frustration and anger is that since they believe that males and females are born with identical brains they don't understand why it is that men appear to have it easier. They think that we have it easier because of the patriarchy. But it's no easier for us, it's because we have more fortitude and ment…
/r/MensRights02/05/23 04:46 PM
2

Restrict your search to TwoXChromosomes and search for I am LIVID
/r/MensRights01/05/23 07:10 AM
1

Trump will say whatever will make him popular with his supporters. Doing those things is entirely another matter.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 04:52 PM
3

Gonads.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 03:55 AM
2

Tell her that it's your wife's business but she's busy making you a sandwich.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 03:43 PM
3

They can, once they have a guy mansplain to them how to do it. /s
/r/MensRights29/04/23 04:25 AM
11

The tried and true argument from the feminists for why more men are in higher paying positions, CEOs, etc. is because of the patriarchy. So isn't this article debunking that?
/r/MensRights28/04/23 04:13 AM
4

There seems to be a push to rewrite history in the media. There's a thread in twox titled "Watson and Crick were widely believed to have hit on the structure of DNA after stealing data from Rosalind Franklin – but newly-discovered documents suggest a different account of this discovery:Franklin did not fail to grasp the structure of DNA. She was an equal contributor to solving it." with a link to an article in nature.com and my reading of that article is that she didn't understand what her work …
/r/MensRights26/04/23 06:15 PM
5

I only watched a little of it because she lost me at the beginning saying that males could engage in risky behavior because once they get a female pregnant their job is done, while the females need to stay alive in order to raise the offspring to adulthood. That may be true for animals like cows where there isn't a partnership between the male and female while the offspring are growing to adulthood. But during human evolution the survival of the offspring depends on the partnership of the male b…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 05:50 PM
14

I really wonder sometimes if women love their husbands in the same way that men love women. So many times I've heard women describe their husband by how helpful he was, how he did things for them, etc. Never about how they enjoyed doing the same things, had the same interests, etc. I think it's yet another innate evolutionary thing where women evolved to look at their mate as the provider. But then on the flip side, a man may love a woman when they're young and get married but when she's in her …
/r/MensRights24/04/23 04:54 AM
-26

If you're short and a doctor or lawyer and make half a million dollars a year the women won't care that you're short. They'll marry a short rich guy any day over a tall, handsome, hung, and muscular guy who drives an Amazon delivery van.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 04:34 AM
8

I confess, I occasionally peruse the PlusSize subreddit, but it's for the laughs. Sundays can be especially rewarding because it's Selfie Sunday.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 01:24 AM
2

What feminists refuse to accept is that While I agree with you one of the things I keep ranting about how they don't think analytically and rationally and typically think emotionally so another argument could be that they are simply unable to figure it out. 🤪
/r/MensRights23/04/23 08:40 PM
7

I laugh at the idea that a wolf whistle is now considered sexual harassment. Apparently even staring is as well. Nevermind that 10 to 1 she's scantily dressed in a way that begs for attention.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 06:17 PM
-2

When you understand and accept evolutionary psychology you can start to identify things in society that are there because they're innate to our species. One of these that I've long observed is that men and women have different values or attitudes about what it means to be successful, or perhaps more broadly what our role is in the world as a person. Both of these roles are there because evolution is about the survival of the offspring, which is about passing on the better genes. Put simply, for …
/r/MensRights23/04/23 04:39 PM
24

When men hate women, they kill us: mass shootings have been attributed to misogyny The original meaning of misogyny was someone who hates women while nowadays feminists have redefined misogyny to merely mean sexist. While some mass shooters may hate women I would guess that it's highly likely that they have mental health problems, and those mental health problems made them hate women. As u/horonlapsi said, they kill because they want to, because they're mentally ill. To equate sexism with mass k…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 04:08 PM
19

She's a true hero! /s
/r/MensRights22/04/23 04:54 PM
1

Absolutely great point. For me it reinforces my belief that the fundamental bedrock problem with feminists is that they don't think analytically, they think emotionally. It's not about power, it's about stupidity.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 05:37 PM
50

Crying about having to walk or having gotten off at the wrong station is an excellent example of how emotionally fragile women can be. Can any of us imagine a guy crying for that reason? She probably also could have called an Uber. As the others have said, you did right.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 05:21 PM
5

Besides the several remarks about women being the spenders I'd also add that women are more gullible and amenable to advertising. Men are more likely to analyze a commercial and recognize when it's bs. Women also have a stronger herd mentality which commercials can easily appeal to.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 12:14 AM
3

Any time you hear a woman complaining about getting unwanted advances I'll bet you that if you saw how she dresses it would be clothes that clearly advertise her wanting advances.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 06:57 PM
16

So many lines from this article just make me laugh. The long experiment of having men in the workplace has failed. Let’s start by asking an important question: Is it even natural for men to be in the workplace in the first place? This reminds me of the recent thread about the diabla subreddit. Let these women expose their wacko thinking so that more people can see how much feminism has made them go off the rails.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 05:10 PM
6

I shudder to think about what the world would be like if the women were the only ones bringing home the bacon. Yet again, notice the author.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 05:01 PM
2

It's bullshit. See my analysis below. Also look at the author of the article; a woman, so it's unlikely that they aren't biased.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:32 PM
2

This topic comes up almost every day on the twox subreddit. My take is that the doctors are doing whatever they can to help, regardless of gender. I.e., they're providing as much pain management as they safely can. But men are stoic and put up with whatever pain they still have while the women love to whine. And since they aren't hearing the men whine the women assume that they are suffering more pain. On twox it's also apparent that this supposed gaslighting occurs regardless of whether their d…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:28 PM
2

Dude, of course it's real. Yet another example of the toxic patriarchy! /s
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:19 PM
2

https://archive.vn/uQlKB
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:18 PM
3

Non-paywall version: https://archive.vn/uQlKB
/r/MensRights18/04/23 04:18 PM
1

Male monkeys prefer boys toys Sex differences in rhesus monkey toy preferences parallel those of children Infants prefer toys typed to their gender These come from an interesting thread about women coders in days gone by. The comments from user u/dionidium are relevant. On the other hand if you do a google search for "Infants show gendered preferences" you can find papers saying that it's all about what toys the parents gave the children. Unsurprisingly, the authors of those papers are all or pr…
/r/MensRights16/04/23 06:49 PM
2

This reminds me of the justification of the Paleo diet (which I think now is more commonly called the Keto diet), which essentially is a low or no starch diet. The claim is that early human were hunter gatherers and didn't farm and therefore didn't eat grains or legumes (beans). But there's no historical evidence for that claim and there are even articles about anthropologists finding evidence of early people eating legumes. The Paleo diet is not a bad diet, but these wacko justifications are a …
/r/MensRights16/04/23 06:34 PM
0

I've thought about that as well. I don't think it would be as bad as you paint it, but yes, likely we'd not be as technically advanced as we are now. Nevertheless, I think that global warming is a red herring and the real problem is overpopulation.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 11:20 PM
-18

Yep. Just think, if the world's population was what it was back when Jesus was born we could be using coal to power our electric plants, coal to heat our homes, dump our garbage in the rivers or burn it, and all kinds of crazy things. It's hard to think about it like that because of the world's extreme population.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 10:06 PM
7

The article is almost 30 years old. I'd bet that most if not all feminists would say that it's no longer relevant, even though that's probably not true. It's a favorite topic in the twox subreddit. Even when their obgyn is a woman they complain about their suffering. My theory is that women are much more likely to whine about something rather than try and find a solution (except that they consider whining the solution).
/r/MensRights15/04/23 08:05 PM
-20

Inertia; could be just basic sexism; guys in the past didn't want to play women and be defeated by them. Back then they could say that, although maybe not publicly.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 04:37 PM
1

I sort of agree with Trooper-Man1776 but my take is that they don't think analytically but instead think emotionally. Speaking of linguistics, misogyny had meant a hatred of women. But nowadays feminists use it to mean sexist, which is definitely not the same thing. I doubt if very few men actually hate women, although many may hate the results of feminism.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 04:30 PM
4

It sounds to me like you're taking the approach that these things, preferences and behaviors, are due to socialization, i.e., nurture over nature. My take is that society echoes or expresses these behaviors and preferences that are innate, and that they are a part of our species. Of course, since they're expressed in our society that provides the feminists and other nurture over nature believers the argument that we've been molded by society. And then there's the usual implied blame that society…
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/23 11:58 PM
6

Another thing that a lot of guys may not know about is that there is a significant percentage of married women who have their own bank account and contribute none of their income to the living expenses. The first time a woman told me that was her situation I was dumbfounded. And there have been posts on twox where women who don't have a job expect their husband to help with the housework, cooking, etc.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/23 05:16 PM
7

Hey go over to reddit twoxxchromosomes and you don’t even need to read any of the posts, just scroll through a few pages and ask yourself, are there male subs that you could actually compare to the nonsense that perpetuates from all of that? This is why I like to scan twox every so often; the level of craziness is amazing. Another sub to add to that mix is the sub TheGirlSurvivalGuide so that you can also see how emotionally delicate they are and how incapable they are at understanding and deali…
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/23 05:11 PM
18

This is an excellent example of how our innate behaviors and preferences work. When they're innate we don't think about them the same way we think about learned behaviors and preferences, they're just utterly true and unquestioned. For example, how men find young women more sexually attractive than old women, or how we all don't like drinking lukewarm water. One of the differences in thinking, how we think, between men and women is that for women listening to their emotions is an automatic innat…
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/23 04:16 PM
4

Now now, let's not get too crazy.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 09:23 PM
11

A bit of a crack in the wall. Feminist ideology preaches that males and females are born with identical brains, and that all differences in behavior, attitudes, etc. are learned. Which flies in the face of known science. E.g., evolutionary psychology. What's interesting to me is I saw the link to this article on twox. It was posted 7 hours ago and only 6 upvotes and no comments. It'll be interesting to see if it stays up and if there's any discussion.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 06:35 PM
28

OP is clearly a misogynistic incel neckbeard! /s
/r/MensRights09/04/23 04:08 PM
9

I'm of the opinion that most of their faulty thinking isn't driven by specific goals but rather due to their lack of analytical thinking combined with an overabundance of emotional thinking. Taken together those two things create a perfect storm of craziness.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 03:42 PM
5

Yes, because they (feminists) don't have a viable explanation as for why they still are behind even with all of the equal rights stuff that's been given them.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 09:08 PM
11

They frame the justification for it being for the child's sake, completely ignoring how it affects the man. Until men can provide a solution for some alternative way of providing for the child I'm guessing that they'll continue to win their argument. It's a successful argument and it makes the man look like some heartless bastard for not wanting the child to have a good home.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:43 PM
2

Adding to my comment above, I think a big part of it is, yet again, evolutionary psychology. Men's brains have been programmed by evolution to see themselves as the providers and our job is a major factor in how we define ourselves. With women they feel like they've been a failure if they don't have any children. We don't necessarily think about these things but they clearly affect the way we operate. And this innate value is expressed in our society.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:33 AM
1

In STEM fields they definitely under perform compared to the men. Guys find technical stuff interesting and like their job. For the women it's simply a 9 to 5 grind.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:30 AM
1

(Smacks forehead.) Duh, how could I forget?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 12:10 AM
12

One problem I see is that they automatically downvote any comments that don't agree with the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 09:56 PM
4

She said it was his “egotistical self entitled sense of humour” that led him to believe others would either not mind or would find his behaviour funny. Reminds me of Al Franken being forced to resign from Congress when he jokingly touched a woman in the military, years before he was in Congress.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 06:15 PM
2

I didn't watch the entire video but the advertisement narrator says "parts created by women." I'm not sure what that means; designed by women? Made by women in the factory on the assembly line? I'm certainly not willing to believe that women invented those things.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 05:31 PM
1

Sure, effectively they are. But do they have that mental mindset, that they're competing with other men? I'd say not, or not as much as women have the competing mindset.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 03:59 PM
1

But there have been several posts here about how women are competing against other women. When I read the original post in twox (titled "Dear men reading this: you're not competing against other men.") my immediate thought was that the poster was projecting a female value since we men know that we're not competing with other men for women, whereas women are competing against other women for men, even though they may not be consciously aware of it or consciously doing it; I think it's likely that…
/r/MensRights01/04/23 10:30 PM
2

Too funny. I get so irritated by all of the "MM" crap that shows up on my ereaderiq.com tab I have pinned for the daily free lgbtq+ books. Irritated because over 99% of it is written by women. It's just garbage romance crap; "shifters" and "reverse harem" and other godawful stuff. I've gotten to the point where I no longer download any free novels if the author is a woman. They just churn stuff out like crazy. And I'm having trouble keeping up with the male author books I do download, which is p…
/r/MensRights31/03/23 06:46 PM
2

Absolutely right. I'm one of the masochists who reads twox and thegirlsurvivalguide and you can see it over and over again. The example that made it clear to me was a post by A who had a male friend B and B had a friend C who A thought she'd like so she asked B to give C her phone number and call her. They had a date or chat and A decided C wasn't a good match so she disengaged. Then eight months later B told A that C had told him that he hadn't cared because he thought A was nothing special. So…
/r/MensRights31/03/23 06:33 PM
11

We don't know when these two things happened. (And of course she wouldn't provide that information, or is too dumb to figure it out.) The husband's root canal could have been back during the opioid crises when doctors where handing them out like candy, and hers was after the opioid crisis.
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/23 06:17 PM
19

Redefining the term bearded clam.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 07:23 PM
13

okay bert Beatrice.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 06:22 PM
662

I hope you have a beard and are hairy as fuck.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 04:52 PM
1

Agreed. What I think is a fundamental problem with feminists is that they deny biology, specifically evolutionary psychology. They believe that boy and girl babies are born with identical brains and that all gender specific stuff is learned and caused by hormones. They have a phrase, "gender is a social construct."
/r/MensRights28/03/23 02:53 AM
3

Far fewer people think watching two men get it on is hot, mostly only gay men. Not true, but not something I would expect a straight man to know: Every day I download one or more free books from Amazon by using ereaderiq.com. One of my tabs that's always open has a filter set for gay and lgbtq+ fiction. Probably at minimum the books that show up there are 98% written by women. For some bizarre (to me) reason women are voracious for gay male erotica. The author L. A. Witt is an example of one who…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 06:03 AM
11

Agreed. Another thing I've noticed is that a lot of times women only want to know what to do differently when what they're doing isn't working. They'll say "why isn't this working?" when what they really mean is "this isn't working, what do I do to make it work?" and then they get upset because the guy will explain why (as well as answer the what) because that's what she asked. Plus, adding to everything you said, men invariably like knowing the why of things, but when it's technical women rarel…
/r/MensRights26/03/23 07:23 PM
6

Searching with google for Va0FtwMWjKm3 brings it up.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 07:03 PM
13

Absolutely. The other problem is that invariably when they provide a counter argument, it's so poorly thought out and analyzed and illogical, etc. that it's hard to not come to the conclusion that they're some toxic feminist pretending to be "logical" and "open minded."
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:13 PM
3

To coincide with no-nut November?
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:08 PM
2

Nah. It would have likely been some dry boring academic ivory tower stuff. With lots of buzzwords that only psychology people understand.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 08:07 PM
1

You're a man; don't give up. Keep your head down and do the best job you can.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 07:21 PM
5

As an interesting counterexample, or whatever, use the search box in the twox subreddit and restrict it to that subreddit for the post "Amazon reviews on Why Women Deserve less making me scared of men". Thumbnail synopsis: as usual, it's all men's fault.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 05:30 PM
12

Years ago I had a roommate who was going to college, majoring in psychology. I once mentioned Psychology Today and he laughed and said that nobody in the field of psychology reads it and that it's pseudo scientific garbage written to entertain people who don't know any better.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 05:12 PM
1

LOL 3lives471! (I'll let him guess whether or not I'm being sarcastic and which LOL I mean.)
/r/MensRights23/03/23 12:26 AM
20

Merely sexist? We know better; you're a misogynist incel neckbeard! /s
/r/MensRights22/03/23 09:25 PM
19

Mod-rodents first sentence is spot on; "Its that and also that men have done pretty much all great achievements were done by men. That has given them massive inferiority complex." There have been studies about how guys are interested in things while girls are interested in people One of the things that I keep repeating is how in software development there's free and open source software (FOSS), which is probably around 99.9% written by men. The tools (languages, compilers, editors, source code s…
/r/MensRights22/03/23 03:26 PM
1

No, I'm saying that the Galbrush Paradox caused fewer awards for women. The Galbrush Paradox forces writers to make women bland uninteresting characters, especially in comparison to the quirky and flawed male characters. And since the male characters have more "wiggle" they can better show off their acting ability.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 04:12 AM
35

So they went gender neutral on these awards and since there's no "best female lead" just "best lead" and so on, it ends up with men winning most of the awards. Why am I not surprised? (The Galbrush Paradox caused fewer awards for women. The Galbrush Paradox forces writers to make women to be bland uninteresting characters, especially in comparison to the quirky and flawed male characters. And since the male characters have more "wiggle" they can better show off their acting ability.) (I didn't r…
/r/MensRights22/03/23 03:18 AM
1

I'm still hiding under my bed from covid so I don't know if it's still happening but this reminds me of the women I've seen in public (the library, the dentist's waiting room) with their "service dog" which they say they need because they have PTSD. The one at the dentist's had a pit bull. PTSD, neurodivergent, and on the autism spectrum are the three popular self diagnoses I see on twox.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 08:04 PM
0

Exactly. I get so tired of people saying things are society's fault, our culture's fault, etc. Especially when it's the feminists because what they mean but aren't specifically saying is that it's the patriarchy's fault. Recognizing that we have inconvenient or inappropriate behaviors due to evolution is scary; instead of blaming Mother Nature let's blame the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 07:58 PM
7

Ouch, my ears. The howling feedback is killing me.
/r/AntiFeminists19/03/23 06:52 PM
2

these same bottom-line-obsessed corporations will just automatically pay men more because… they’re men? Yeah, dude, because you know, the patriarchy! /s
/r/MensRights18/03/23 09:48 PM
1

she legit went to the conclusion that I was a mysoginistic incel, whatever The word you were wanting was neckbeard.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 04:05 AM
12

The problem with innate behaviors and preferences is that they're utterly true, so true and hard wired that we don't think about them the same way we think about learned knowledge. (If we think about innate stuff at all.) With learned knowledge and preferences we can ask ourselves if something is true and useful. But how many guys are going to ask themselves if they ought to find forty year old women more sexually attractive than 18 year old women? Or that drinking warm body temperature water is…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 12:34 AM
1

I absolutely agree 100% about their dominance in journalism and the media. I also think that a big factor that drives their unhappiness is how regardless of all of the changes in society favoring women, so that women can work for example, and yet men are still the movers and shakers in society. My favorite example is in software where 99% of the free open source software is written by men, even though all of the tools and resources needed are freely available. Evolution wired men's brains to be …
/r/MensRights17/03/23 05:18 PM
13

Silly boy, you forgot to take that class in mind reading.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 05:03 PM
122

it’s simply hardwired into our brains. Yep. I recently had an "ah hah!" moment when reading the subs TwoXChromosomes and TheGirlSurvivalGuide that there are many innate differences between men and women, but women have a much harder time understanding that these differences are innate. Admittedly there are plenty of guys who also believe that society and upbringing are the primary factors for our behavior but with women it seems that 99.99% of them don't believe that things are innate.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 04:59 PM
21

The articles in the media, magazines, news, web, are largely written by women. They write with the slant that women are disadvantaged. The media has a lot of influence.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 04:06 AM
35

Non paywall version: https://archive.vn/XmGUF
/r/MensRights12/03/23 05:49 PM
57

Tsk tsk, there you go again, expecting a feminist to think analytically and rationally. /s
/r/MensRights12/03/23 01:58 AM
2

I absolutely agree but I think it's much too bitter of a pill for them to swallow. My thinking is that their issues are the result of evolutionary psychology and they would need to accept that men's and women's brains are different at birth. That would then open the can of worms of allowing the (what we now consider to be) sexist ideas from the Victorian age, that women are emotionally fragile, less able or willing to think analytically, etc. It's so much easier for them to sit back and blame ev…
/r/MensRights10/03/23 06:01 PM
5

From a very young age, women are told that they only have value when they are pretty. As usual, it's "the patriarchy." Being upset about a bad haircut is one thing, but crying about it? It's hard to imagine any guy doing that. They are just more open to expressing their feelings rather than bottling them up. Oh, silly me, that crying woman was just "expressing her feelings." since women experience so much sexual violence. More bs about women and sexual violence. You'd think they're being sexuall…
/r/MensRights05/03/23 04:51 AM
3

(Somehow I managed to not cry afterwards when my doctor stuck his finger up my butt to check my prostate gland.)
/r/MensRights04/03/23 10:56 PM
15

Regarding the college stuff, for STEM the overwhelming majority of the people doing significant and useful stuff there is still men. My favorite example is open source software. The tools to create open source software are freely downloadable (python, java, go, rust, C++, etc.), also free are the places to make it available (github, sourceforge, etc.). And yet the percentage of women creating open source software is microscopic. Likewise, Youtube tutorials for technical stuff are all done by men…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 10:47 PM
9

Feminists argue that it's a myth that men are more sexually responsive to visual stimuli This really highlights how ignorant feminists are about how different men and women's brains are. But it's not surprising given that they believe that baby boys and girls are born with identical brains. The other thing that I find interesting is how emotionally fragile women can be. I've been browsing twox and some of the other feminist subs and it's interesting to see how often they cry over something that …
/r/MensRights04/03/23 10:37 PM
2

Ignoring the baggage attached to their meanings (incel and misogynist), the meanings of words can change over time. For example it's annoying to me that I grew up knowing that alternate meant to switch between two states, off and on, for example, but now everyone uses it to mean alternative. Or, a word still changing, that nonplussed meant upset, unhappy, bothered, but now people use it to mean unconcerned, not bothered, etc. But yeah, I was quite surprised to learn that misogynist now means sex…
/r/MensRights03/03/23 05:31 PM
3

Your first paragraph hits the nail on the head for what I've been thinking. To make it even worse for them I believe that women's brains are biologically, due to evolutionary psychology, more likely to be emotionally sensitive, and just taking testosterone and not having estrogen doesn't change the structure of their brain, and that emotional sensitivity makes it even more difficult for them.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 05:24 PM
0

More pointless irrelevant anecdotal blather. Nothing to do with science. Stuff from television, movies, youtube etc. is just entertainment; do you really believe that stuff?
/r/MensRights03/03/23 03:54 PM
2

Yeah, for a mechanic it does sound like a bad situation; females trying to prove they're more macho and knowledgeable than the male mechanics. In my case I was a combination software developer and server system administrator, an office job.
/r/AntiFeminists03/03/23 03:08 AM
0

Anecdotal evidence is irrelevant and doesn't negate science (evolutionary psychology).
/r/MensRights03/03/23 03:04 AM
11

My two best supervisors were women. It was a very technical job and they understood that their job was herding cats and listened to us.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/23 09:51 PM
16

... and often taking years off from pursuing their careers in order to raise children. That's how they fall behind in terms of skills and knowledge. That may be true but I think a bigger factor is that men are simply more motivated. As I said in the thread titled "Why don't women start their own companies instead of complaining about male dominated ones?" in the MensRights sub: My thinking is that, as usual, it's due to evolutionary psychology. Evolution programmed men to be providers, while wom…
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/23 09:45 PM
-3

I tend to think it's because society has told women they are entitled to do whatever they want and it's become verboten to ever criticize them. Look at the flip side of the coin: why do men find young healthy women more sexually attractive compared to old women? It's evolution. If a male chooses a young and healthy female then his genes are more likely to get passed on by his offspring because that female is more likely to survive the birthing and live long enough to raise them to sexual maturit…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 06:46 PM
57

Heaven forbid that the earnings gap should have anything to do with the majority of women not being as motivated and proficient as men.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/23 06:35 PM
3

f you give an in depth explanation, it just immediately becomes mansplaining, Exactly. The difference I've noticed over and over is that if, for example, you ask a man "is A better or B?" he will likely tell you which he thinks is better and then explain why, but women most often don't want to know the reason why unless it' something trivial like "B is what has always worked for me." This is especially true when the man's explanation is technical; for women that explanation is just a bunch of us…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 05:28 AM
1

I just always vote Democrat.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 08:01 PM
2

Are lesbian women more assertive in the workplace, bargaining for higher salaries than hetero women? Do lesbian women study more and have higher educational achievements? There was a comment in this sub or one of the other mrm subs that lesbians made more because they understood that they weren't going to marry some guy who would "save" them, that they understood that they need to be financially independent.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 07:51 PM
1

https://archive.vn/rMVTk
/r/MensRights28/02/23 07:46 PM
10

Look at the review on Angi: Outstanding!!! Austin came out to provide the quote and since we were flexible with timing, he called in a favor to reduce the fee. The three technicians (Levi, Grant, Danny) were professional and happily completed the task within a day. The product looks great and my neighbors have already noticed from the street and asked questions about who did the work... Likewise with Yelp: We were referred to 3G Concrete by our landscaper. we worked with Eli Gabriel and he was v…
/r/MensRights26/02/23 05:17 PM
5

My thinking is that, as usual, it's due to evolutionary psychology. Evolution programmed men to be providers, while women are programmed to be mothers. A man's identity, and notion of being successful, is intricately tied to how good of a provider/worker he is while a woman's is not. Because it's innate we don't consciously think about it but it clearly affects our behavior.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 05:10 PM
3

Some of the responses are classic feminist buffoonery. For example, denying basic biology and evolutionary psychology: "I am still baffled that so many people believe men and women are somehow fundamentally different."
/r/MensRights18/02/23 05:01 AM
1

Since you're a woman your argument makes sense from a woman's perspective.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 05:38 AM
6

many of these patterns of male dominance still exist And of course they don't understand that it's not male dominance, but that men are simply better and more successful at the tasks that are important and in the fields that women are less represented in. Women are less represented in those fields because they aren't as good doing whatever it is.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 08:01 PM
1

The patriarchy is preventing them from attending! /s
/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:48 PM
4

What Amazing-Bit6140 said. When you say that men have a stronger sex drive than women it's seen by them as saying that men are "better" and that women don't enjoy sex as much as men do. Similary, it's obvious to me that men are much more visually sexually excited by an attractive person, which again, is something that will upset feminists if you say it. Any time you say men are "more" at something the feminists get upset. Throughout the history of the human race women have been told that men are…
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/23 05:37 PM
35

Of course! Because women's mental health issues are all due to "the patriarchy". /s
/r/MensRights06/02/23 01:29 AM
0

Understanding evolutionary psychology and how it affects us leads to realizing that there's a lot of innate stuff that we don't recognize or identify and they make us behave and make choices that we do. It's our version of instincts and they're preferences and behaviors that are so fundamentally true that we don't think about them the way we do learned things. Because these things are so fundamentally true we all agree about them and they're a part of our society and culture. But because they're…
/r/MensRights05/02/23 06:02 PM
6

Good point; thanks.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 02:19 AM
5

Disclaimer: I didn't read the article. I don't understand the value of this information. Aren't single men more likely to be young and not not well established enough in their career to afford a house? Another idea is if a woman is married but files singly, would she pay lower income tax if the house is in her name rather than both of their names? At work we had a thing where when purchasing stuff we were supposed to give precedence to minority owned businesses and it turned out that a lot of gu…
/r/MensRights04/02/23 10:29 PM
7

It could be some are like the couple that live across the street from me. When the wife got divorced from her first husband he made some deal where she got the house and he didn't pay any alimony. At least that's the scuttlebutt I heard from a neighbor.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 10:22 PM
1

Sorry, I'm a slow learner. 🤪
/r/MensRights03/02/23 10:28 PM
1

I think that's a big problem feeding feminism these days; an overabundance of female journalists. Likewise with the Galbrush paradox where scripts and books largely portray women as being smarter and better than men, at minimum being just as competent as men at difficult male-only jobs (and jobs that in real life women rarely if ever do, my favorite being blacksmiths).
/r/MensRights03/02/23 09:38 PM
11

I don't doubt that there were more women doing computer work in those early days. But all that they were doing was what was called keyboarding, entering data or software that was put on punched cards. The idea that women did "vast mathematical calculations before machines took over" is ludicrous unless they were using an adding machine.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/23 06:46 PM
20

Yeah, what algo_trader_6ix said. It's like pissing into the wind trying to use logic and reason with feminists.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 06:39 PM
2

True, but the ones who aren't feminists, to use a phrase my grandfather once used, as rare as tits on a duck.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 04:48 PM
24

She's always singing the praises of female incels after having described the male incels as misogynist losers. I couldn't finish it. Yeah, right, "enigmatic subculture". As someone else said, with a woman journalist it's very unlikely you'll see anything objective with these kinds of topics.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 05:34 AM
1

Right. Not being comfortable with another person's accent I'm guessing is a form of xenophobia.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/23 01:00 AM
3

For myself, when I hear a black person speaking AAVE I can't help but think that they're uneducated and stupid. Of course that's wrong. Black people have subtly or otherwise been made to feel speaking AAVE is bad and papers have been written about it, and so they needed a name.
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/23 07:28 PM
12

Ignoring the discrimination, with single use restrooms you are free to ignore the signs and use either one. I've definitely seen women do that when it's simply male vs female restrooms.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:19 PM
8

The team suggested this could indicate that employees were consciously or unconsciously avoiding working in mixed-gender occupations. I'd say that it's much less due to conscious or unconscious avoidance but rather due to the realization that the women aren't doing as much work as the men and the supervisors aren't dealing with them. At least that's been my experience; women who work well below the level of their job title and their supervisor doesn't or can't do anything about it, probably out …
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:10 PM
4

African American Vernacular English. Examples that occur to me is leaving out the "to be" verbs; e.g., "he mad" instead of "he is mad" or, different rule, "who like pizza" instead of "who likes pizza".
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/23 06:59 PM
3

Here's the adult version of boys will be boys. As everyone else has said, with adult men it's just clowning around. r / JustGuysBeingDudes/
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/23 04:10 AM
31

What Ok-Translator2294 said. Great facial expressions. She should be going into acting if she isn't already.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/23 05:37 PM
7

Yes, I agree with what you've said. But their problem is that no matter what they "do" they're still not getting ahead. And by what I mean "do", as far as I can see is all that they're doing is whining and complaining. Their only solution is for the so called patriarchy to solve their problems.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/23 02:56 AM
10

Nah, there's too much irrationality with feminism. I'd just as soon believe the earth is flat.
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/23 05:20 PM
1

God forbid that men sexualize women.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 07:55 PM
5

In addition to what the others here have said, the women there only "think" with their emotions. Not rational thinking or analysis.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 07:29 PM
2

To me it's no worse or better than believing that the Earth is flat.
/r/AntiFeminists23/01/23 06:53 PM
10

See also the Galbrush paradox. My thinking is that even though making the male characters buffoons is a problem, always making the women characters the ones with brains, being rational and logical thinkers, level headed, etc. is a bigger problem because it's making women have unrealistic expectations of themselves and when those expectations aren't met then, as usual, it's the fault of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 09:03 PM
5

acknowledging this very basic biological fact that predates any social structures The blank slate idea is a bedrock of feminist ideology. They believe that boys and girls are born with identical brains and everything is learned; nurture over nature, where nurture isn't stronger than any inborn traits but that there are no inborn traits. Unfortunately there are still many men who believe that society and upbringing are the primary factors and that pre-programmed stuff in our brains is insignifica…
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 08:53 PM
2

I don't remember which one it was in. I have a multireddit with these subs in it so it was in one of these. It was posted within the last week or so as I remember. More likely it was in the one of the first two or three. MensRights antifeminists everydaymisandry ToxicFeminismIsToxic LeftWingMaleAdvocates WomenWritingMen
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/23 03:57 PM
4

Yeah, but all those brilliant women scientists would solve the sperm problem. /s
/r/MensRights21/01/23 05:06 AM
1

Women being "edgy".
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/23 09:38 PM
5

Look on the bright side, at least she didn't pepper spray him like that women did to the jogger who ran past her.
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/23 10:09 PM
1

The old posts are still there, just page through to them.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/23 04:09 AM
4

It's one of the better ones for observing their crazy antics. Dern, I really miss FemaleDatingStrategy; that one was the best.
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/23 04:26 PM
13

Serves you right you disgusting neckbeard incel misogynist pedo! /s
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/23 04:24 PM
1

I'm an atheist and wasn't raised conservative or religious. In their case I think it's more of a gender issue. https://www.reddit.com/user/lumpynose/comments/zp7wc5/links_to_evolutionary_psychology_and_more/
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/23 09:09 PM
6

She says Now that I'm older (mid 20s), I wanted to try showing some skin for a change, to gain more confidence in my body. Since about a few months ago, I started to wear sexier clothes-- shorts, skirts,dresses, sleeveless/low-cut shirts, crop tops. And then an early response is The important distinction, however, is that you're talking about dressing NICELY, not revealingly. The equivalent would be if OP said she started getting more attention from men when she started wearing evening gowns, bl…
/r/AntiFeminists10/01/23 08:36 PM
1

This possibly natural difference between genders is one of those things we have to understand to get along. No "possibly" about it. See the link I gave above about evolutionary psychology.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 07:57 PM
3

Not that I care about a prince but it's a good point. When I heard he was marrying an actress I had the feeling that that was a mistake.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 07:03 PM
0

I like that the article points out, correctly, that a lot of our behaviors and preferences are not learned but are innate, from our genes. The confusing part about these things is that since the brain cells with these preferences have been put in our brains by our genes, these preferences have a level of truthfulness that's much higher than learned preferences. And since they're from our genes they're a part of our species, and therefore they manifest as a part of our society, and people then as…
/r/MensRights10/01/23 07:00 PM
4

The idea that "everything is learned" is a foundation of feminist ideology. And it's very very wrong. Read some of the following. https://www.reddit.com/user/lumpynose/comments/zp7wc5/links_to_evolutionary_psychology_and_more/
/r/MensRights10/01/23 06:51 PM
3

You should add pedophile to your list. Also rapist.
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/23 01:07 AM
2

From India.
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/23 01:04 AM
1

However what you said is still the case in sociology and gender studies As far as I'm concerned it's no better or no worse than believing the Earth is flat.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 06:25 PM
1

That's good to hear. I knew a woman who was a psychology researcher and had a PhD from Stanford and she believed in the blank slate idea. But this was back in the early 1990s and I have no idea what her beliefs are now.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 01:02 AM
1

Yes, absolutely.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 12:56 AM
10

Thanks for the link, it was an interesting read. I believe that the various social sciences; psychology, gender studies, sociology, etc. are deeply flawed because they all believe in the blank slate idea, that everything is learned and nothing in our brains is there as a result of genetics and evolution.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 12:39 AM
1

Like come on, ladies. Use ur thinking brains And therein lies the problem. There are so few who can and do.
/r/AntiFeminists03/01/23 06:39 PM
2

It's an absolute total waste of time to post anything that even vaguely disagrees with feminists to any of the feminist subs so who cares? I use the "old" reddit which lets me create multi-reddits and I have one that's a combination of several feminist subs, https://www.reddit.com/user/lumpynose/m/crazy_women/, which I browse occasionally to see how wacko they are. But I'm not subscribed to any of them so their nonsense doesn't show up on my home page. I especially loved FemaleDatingStrategy for…
/r/MensRights02/01/23 09:12 PM
19

What extra-strike said. If you don't support or you disagree with feminists you're tarred with the label incel, plain and simple.
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/23 08:59 PM
1

Back when I was younger I got the impression that gay men weren't as supportive of feminists as they are now. My interpretation was that since gay men aren't interested sexually in women we're less likely to overlook their shortcomings. For example, a straight man would be much more likely to overlook mistakes made by a hot sexy administrative assistant/secretary.
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/23 08:56 PM
4

I definitely had supported feminists when I was younger. But I worked in the IT industry which has a lot of women since it's office work and I was chronically dealing with women who were, for lack of a better word, slackers compared to the men, and at the same time were whining about how unfair it was that the men ended up getting the raises, promotions, etc. When it comes to problem solving the men grasp the bull by the horns while the women expect the men to help them solve their problems. Wom…
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/23 08:46 PM
1

I've made several replies and posts on askgaybros that are antifeminist which have been upvoted and received positive replies. But it is true that the majority of gay men on that sub support feminists. But the overwhelming majority of them are also in their 20s (there have been several polls asking for age) and it's obvious that they lack experience with the world.
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/23 08:38 PM
3

For gay men it's rather trivial. Most straight men probably have no idea how easy it is for gay men to hook up with other gay men.
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/23 08:10 PM
23

If you're making $250K plus a year and you're fat and ugly the only thing they really care about is that income.
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/23 08:07 PM
1

r / UpvoteBecauseButt r / UpvotedBecauseBoobs r / jiggledolls https://youtu.be/mgw6y3cH7tA
/r/AntiFeminists02/01/23 05:32 PM
3

The article was written by a woman; automatic red flag for me.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/23 07:59 PM
3

Easy, look at their post history.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/23 07:58 PM
7

Many don't get sarcasm and irony so adding a /s at the end is your best bet.
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/23 07:58 PM
9

Her response to the second one, "How much money do you make?" made me laugh; her response was "that's making me feel a little uneasy." Like, wtf? When is that ever an appropriate question unless it's something strictly finance related, like you're talking to a realtor about buying a house. I got the sense that the video's purpose was to coach women how to not say things that are red flags.
/r/AntiFeminists31/12/22 07:37 PM
1

That's exactly what the feminists want us to believe, that it's society's fault. Learn about the blank slate idea that's a core value for feminist ideology. See also evolutionary psychology.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 06:35 PM
3

In fact, men were socially programmed and conditioned to believe, by women and women's state violence proxy, that as a man, if you didn't provide for and protect women, you weren't worthy, as a man, of love, marriage or affection. This programming comes from our genes; i.e., evolution. Similarly, women are programmed to think that their primary goal is to have children. Both sides to the same coin. The interesting thing about these innate values, preferences, etc. is that we don't think about th…
/r/MensRights29/12/22 06:19 PM
1

An addendum to my previous post: I think that the problem that women have (see my links about evolutionary psychology) is that evolution has given them the innate preference to look to men to be the problem solvers. I think that they innately have a very difficult time analyzing and thinking about how they can or should solve their problems.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/22 05:03 AM
5

I've responded to similar posts about male dominated industries with this Seems to me that they're merely fighting for men to fix their problems. For example, there was a recent post about the speculum, the thing gynecologists use when inspecting the vagina. There was a picture from a medical devices history museum and something about the same design being in use for hundreds of years, and how it was uncomfortable and for some, painful when used on them. They were complaining about "those people…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/22 04:56 AM
6

Looks like a replacement for FemaleDatingStrategy but not just for females. But perhaps primarily inhabited by by former FDS members.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/22 04:34 AM
3

Advocate understanding evolutionary psychology. The vast majority of what the feminist ideology is based on is the blank slate idea, which is wrong. It's a tough row to hoe getting feminists to believe this because it reveals that there are innate differences in how men and women think.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 07:10 PM
2

Needs a title using the word female, then it would be.
/r/AntiFeminists27/12/22 05:52 PM
8

The patriarchy is a convenient red herring. Feminists don't want to face the facts of evolutionary psychology.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 10:31 PM
13

I definitely agree about me being a slob and not caring about cleaning. I finally got a house cleaner that comes every 2 weeks and gives the place a good going over. Before that I couldn't even touch the kitchen counters without having a chisel handy to unglue my hand that was stuck.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:57 AM
-1

My theory is that it's yet another innate thing that evolution produced. When we were evolving, for the females it is a good survival quality to be fearful of wandering alone at night.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:53 AM
8

They're fighters, I'll give them that. Seems to me that they're merely fighting for men to fix their problems. For example, there was a recent post about the speculum, the thing gynecologists use when inspecting the vagina. There was a picture from a medical devices history museum and something about the same design being in use for hundreds of years, and how it was uncomfortable and for some, painful when used on them. They were complaining about "those people" not having updated the design aft…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:45 AM
6

I don't know what Britain's laws about speech are Speaking of their laws, Britian's laws for slander seem to be rather broader than our laws in the US. I remember an article several years ago where some guy in Britain said something along the lines that chiropractors are quacks and Britain's chiropractic organization took him to court for slander.
/r/AntiFeminists22/12/22 08:16 PM
2

Sometimes I can't help but wonder if some women who are so foolish are mentally disabled, so it works on multiple levels.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/22 05:21 PM
1

They lack basic reading comprehension skills because they're distracted by her boobs.
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/22 02:31 AM
1

A good example of the Galbrush Paradox.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 04:20 AM
8

It's hard to say since what stuff of his we see on reddit has been edited with the context and other stuff removed to make it sound bad.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 01:57 AM
8

See the sub MenWritingWomen where they're constantly blasting examples of men objectifying women as sex objects. Then look at the subs RecoilButts, UpvoteBecauseButt, UpvotedBecauseBoobs, etc. and roll your eyes. I've never seen anything on the feminist subs where they say anything about women toning down their clothing, showing less skin, etc.
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 01:53 AM
6

"Not all women are like that."
/r/AntiFeminists19/12/22 01:45 AM
3

Yet another example of how men recognize true talent.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 07:21 PM
5

I meant when talking to the unemployment office; they might be protective of her records.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 05:32 AM
7

Yep. I read a book several years ago by a female author that was set before, during, and after WWII about a woman, she had a job during the war collecting tickets on a city trolley. After the war when they were demobilizing soldiers and sailors the trolley company laid her off saying that the men coming back home needed jobs. The author portrayed it as an injustice.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 05:32 AM
5

Try to come up with a reason for asking so it doesn't sound like you're spying on her. For example, say you're trying to help her with record keeping or something.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 05:08 AM
7

As her husband can you go to the unemployment people and see what they have about her?
/r/MensRights16/12/22 05:04 AM
3

value of that work In a capitalistic society the way I look at a worker's value, how much they get paid, is how hard it is to replace that person or hire someone to do the job. So even though working at a daycare center taking care of children is a very important job, for the parents at least, anyone can do that job. On the other hand finding someone to be a doctor or a lawyer is much less trivial. So the value of the job has nothing to do with how important that job is; professional athletes ar…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 04:25 AM
38

And didn't we all feel horribly demeaned by her use of the word male?!
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 07:36 PM
4

The /s means sarcasm. My interpretation for their rage is here.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 04:41 AM
22

Don't forget BirdsArentReal. https://birdsarentreal.com/pages/the-history
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 10:36 PM
22

Serves you right; anyone who participates in this sub is obviously a misogynistic incel neckbeard pedophiliac. /s
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 08:26 PM
21

Could have also asked her how much she weighed and her height.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 08:21 PM
28

I like it. It's a good place to find funny stuff. And a regular reminder of how humorless they are.
/r/AntiFeminists13/12/22 05:49 PM
2

Heh, I was guessing you were an Aussie. I read a lot of British authors so I know a lot of their slang.
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/22 05:15 AM
5

I seriously doubt that to be true. I have a pinned tab to EreaderIQ (a list of tody's free ebooks from amazon) filtered for LGBT+ and well over 90% of it is written by women. Same with LGBT+ ebooks from my library. They aren't written for gay men, just the usual trashy romances that women like. I didn't realize that they were written for women until I posted a question about them on r/WomenWritingMen.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 04:44 AM
2

has been on the glass barbecue That's a new one for me; what does it mean? And what country are you from in case it's not the same as mine? (US)
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/22 03:58 AM
2

Very true.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 10:11 PM
8

I agree with all of the things that you guys are saying but I'm also bothered by how thirsty she is for attention and drama. If this had been a guy I'd predict that he wouldn't be making a bunch of tiktok videos about it.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 09:34 PM
7

Just the way she's dressed screams "everybody look at me!"
/r/MensRights11/12/22 09:23 PM
6

See also the Galbrush paradox. "When it comes to creating great characters, there’s a lot of flexibility when it comes to male characters. With female characters, though, there are too many unwritten rules to keep track of." and "By that, I mean there are a lot of things you can do with a male character that you just can’t do with a female character. Even male minority characters have a lot more flexibility, in terms of what you can put them through." (I ignore his thing about Stan Lee being som…
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 09:15 PM
2

Right. I'm thinking that a burn from a hair curler would be fairly straight and not very wide. Not like a hickey.
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 07:56 PM
1

My thinking is that it's not specifically men that they're afraid of when alone and at night, but a general fear. Back when we were cave men they would have to worry about wild animals as well as marauding men from other tribes.
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 06:42 PM
1

which i guess could look like something else? A hickey is what we called them back in my youth.
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 06:39 PM
4

Burning herself accidentally with the hair curler also sounds dodgy. Is it so hot that a brief touch burned her?
/r/AntiFeminists11/12/22 05:19 AM
6

No, not at all in this case. This is an instinctive innate behavior, being fearful when alone outside at night. It has nothing to do with manipulating. I think that this is a big part of what makes evolutionary psychology so hard to figure out, because these innate behaviors and preferences are hard-wired and we don't even think about them because they're so fundamental to our mental makeup. Unlearning them will be very difficult. Here is some reading you might find helpful. https://rationalwiki…
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/22 09:13 PM
17

My take is that this fear that women have when alone and at night is another one of the innate things that comes from evolution, i.e., evolutionary psychology. These things are hard to rationalize since they trigger our emotions.
/r/AntiFeminists10/12/22 06:11 PM
1

And very very few of us who were are not whining about it.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/12/22 02:30 AM
4

The commute trains here have seats that are made for two people. Seats by the doors are clearly marked for people with disabilities and old people. And I regularly see an obviously able bodied and young women sitting in one with her purse and whatnot in the seat space next to her. Even if they have their purse in their lap, do they notice when someone with a cane or is disabled gets on the train and offer the seat to them? Rarely, if ever.
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/22 01:20 AM
13

Heck, I would be angry as well if things weren't going well for me due to my own behaviors and the only way I knew how to cope with it was to blame it on others, and therefore things never get better. There are regularly posts here and on the other mens rights subs about how there are more women going to college than men and yet where are the companies like Twitter, Facebook, Apple, etc. that were started by women? I play with the 3d software Blender and there are precious few tutorial videos on…
/r/AntiFeminists09/12/22 01:07 AM
1

They closed themselves down, essentially. I'm not sure but I'm guessing it was because so many people were making fun of them. It would be interesting to know if their moderators got private messages complaining from women. If you go there you can see their explanation for their alternative.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 07:13 PM
7

The names of some of the subs here are funny. Some of us fondly remember (and miss) the sub FemaleDatingStrategy. Back in the 1970s and 1960s it was demeaning to use the word girl to refer to adult women. But then we have the subs NotHowGirlsWork and TheGirlSurvivalGuide. What I also find amusing about female being a bad word is that it's where the word feminist comes from, and feminine, etc. And that gives us the subs Feminism and AskFeminists. If you want to see them going bonkers about it see…
/r/MensRights08/12/22 05:26 AM
3

At the time I didn't know that.
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/22 05:35 PM
1

In the post I was referring to she was talking about safety. Perhaps also consent. There are always risks to sex. And people have the right to choose how much risk they're willing to accept. If you cross that boundary, that's rape. Cumming inside of somebody can cause infections if he doesn't impregnate her. If he does impregnate her, she suffers financially, may undergo surgery, may suffer months of illness, days of excruciating labor, weeks of horrendous recovery, and may even lose her life. I…
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 09:18 PM
1

Several months ago there was a post on twox from a woman who'd gotten friended on linkedin (a sort of mini facebook for professionals) by a guy who she claimed raped her when they were in college, I think it was maybe 10 years previously. They'd been at a party and were both drunk and he offered to walk her to her apartment. The next morning she woke up and he was in bed with her naked and asleep and she said his dick was in her. She filed a rape accusation against him and the university had a h…
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 07:54 PM
2

Can someone explain to me what teddit is? Versus reddit.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 07:47 PM
56

I had a lesbian coworker who said that men suffered from testosterone poisoning. I still think it's funny; I'll take it any day over estrogen poisoning.
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 07:40 PM
2

According to google the OED defines patriarchy as "a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it." That's largely true, although the feminists all preach that the reason men hold the power is because they don't want to share it and are selfishly holding on to it. My thinking is that men hold the power, because as has been noted, we're the ones building the skyscrapers, the roads, repairing the cars, and doing all of the dangerous and dirty w…
/r/AntiFeminists06/12/22 08:46 AM
-4

As a woman I would hate myself for being stupid and weak.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 10:52 PM
16

In addition to what u/ReWildingOfMen said, there's a huge difference in how easily we men can deal with a situation and, for example, not be worried about how others will perceive us, versus how the vast majority of women have difficulty dealing with it. Whenever I browse r/TheGirlSurvivalGuide I'm always amazed at how they're so much more emotionally fragile and weak and need validation and feedback.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 10:03 PM
4

The person is probably just ill informed. Definitely not in the minority for that sub.
/r/AntiFeminists05/12/22 09:52 PM
3

And of course the r/funnymemes post was posted to r/BlatantMisogyny and they're foaming at the mouth.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 07:52 PM
4

Don't waste your time responding to anything you see there. They don't want an open or logical discussion. Browse and be amazed and amused and that's all.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 02:40 AM
1

I see it more as what's on TV, movies, and books. The idea that women can do anything a man can do. So many stories have women doing stuff that very very few women would want to do, or even be capable of doing. My favorite is fantasy books that have a female blacksmith. Then the reality hits them and their justification for not wanting or being able to do these things is of course the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 04:27 AM
7

Absolutely. I've also noticed that when something is not working as expected and a woman asks for help, most often what they want is directions how to make it work correctly. But a man will often add an explanation about why it wasn't working the way they were doing it and women typically aren't interested in that explanation and (in their minds at least) they're calling that mansplaining. If she asks a woman for help, the other woman will typically just tell her what to do to make it work with …
/r/MensRights04/12/22 04:15 AM
3

A true FemaleDatingStrategy High Value Male.
/r/AntiFeminists03/12/22 06:03 AM
2

Exactly my thoughts. 👌
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/22 05:56 PM
2

I can't help but wonder what the responses would have been like if this had been posted on twox.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/22 05:16 AM
7

Again, genetics rears its ugly head. /s
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/22 09:52 PM
39

The NotHowGirlsWork sub is always full of perfect examples of their lack of humor.
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/22 05:34 PM
1

One thing that hasn't changed is blaming men. Back in the late 1960s / early 1970s the feminists had a "burn the bra" movement that correctly identified the problem where women wearing sexy clothes was leading to inappropriate comments from men and men treating them as sex objects. And a lot of women were dressing down back then. But the reason they gave for why women were wearing these things is that men were making them. So the same old patriarchy malarky. The reason they wear sexy clothes is …
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/22 05:31 PM
6

If you understand their "logic" this makes perfect sense. Feminists believe in the blank slate idea, that boys and girls are born with identical brains and that our brains are completely empty, with no innate preferences, behaviors, etc. So in their narrative everything is learned. See the "Psychology and neurobiology" in this wikipedia entry.
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/22 02:45 AM
0

I agree. But if those Victorian perceptions are true it could limit their ability to get hired, for example.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 07:31 PM
0

The consequences of it being true could be bad for women; we could find out that the Victorians were right, that women are overly emotional, emotionally fragile, and don't think analytically. But it seems to me that a more successful strategy would be to identify the problematic behaviors and then in school teach girls how to avoid them.
/r/AntiFeminists27/11/22 07:21 PM
1

Great article, thanks. They also have an article on evolutionary psychology.
/r/AntiFeminists26/11/22 07:50 PM
7

I have the radical view that it's the rejection of evolutionary psychology that's hurting women. See these two pages on evolutionary psychology, wikipedia and Britannica. The last section of the Britannica page, Controversy, talks a bit about the biological psychological gender differences. As long as women blame everything on the patriarchy and don't try to understand whatever innate biological preferences, attitudes, etc. could be hindering them they'll never move forward.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 02:48 AM
2

The example that makes me roll my eyes is when a guy points out that when females wear sexy revealing clothes that it's unsurprising that men regard her as a sex object (e.g., random guys complementing her on her looks) then females will respond saying that's "rape" enabling. Nobody said anything about rape, just that if you dress in a way that shouts "look at me, I'm hot" then it's inevitable that you'll get comments.
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/22 07:31 PM
1

Regardless of whether or not it's satire or serious it's very funny. I come down on the side of satire. The red SEXIST is slightly off; feminists prefer the word misogynist. But other than that it's so perfect it could easily be serious. Google found his twitter account which looks like satire to me. He's a hoot! He labels himself as a "JLGBTQIA+ Advocate"; what's the J? Look at his polls; e.g., "Should men who excessively stare or walk too close to women be charged with sexual harassment?" With…
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/22 05:55 PM
3

Not exactly your question but my brother got married because she was pregnant. After they were married they had another kid and it's obvious that the first one isn't his. He's blond Scandinavian and the first kid looks like it's half Mexican/Latin (they lived in Southern California at the time) and the shape of the face isn't at all like the other child, which is obviously from my brother. I've always wondered if his wife knew he wasn't the father and she had sex with him in order to pin the pre…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 05:59 PM
1

Women choose to dress the way they do because it makes them feel good. Can you explain why it makes them feel good?
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:48 PM
0

Or why not have the money go to nonspecific cancer research? Surely there must be overlap in causes, origins, etc. wtih prostate cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, etc.?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 09:10 PM
1

I have a rather retrograde theory, which is that the Victorians were right thinking that women's brains were biologically or inherently different than men's. I'm guessing that they didn't know about DNA and genetics and evolution but given the history of humankind they could see that few, if any, women were at the same mental and intellectual level as men. So the patriarchy came about because men had to take up the slack, as it were, for women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/22 02:48 AM
1

That's a tremendous generalization, dude. As a woman of course you would say that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 08:40 PM
2

I'm not disagreeing with you but many years ago I read a book by a former ambassador to the Soviet Union and he said a recurring question people in the US asked is why they didn't revolt against their government. He pointed out that they had never experienced a democratic government so they didn't know any different.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 05:45 PM
-2

This reinforces my belief that so much of what's wrong with the feminist narrative is that they're unwilling or incapable of thinking analytically. They think with their emotions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 05:40 PM
13

I kinda get the whole ideological view of citizens being responsible To me it's the same as if someone said that the Jews who escaped shouldn't have left Germany during and before the Holocaust. "They should stay and oppose the Holocaust." Wtf?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 05:27 PM
1

Part of it I think is simply due to how women are. For example, have a look at r/JustGuysBeingDudes/ and ask yourself, how many women can you imagine doing that stuff?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/22 07:08 PM
2

There are a lot of videos about how to apply makeup, or style hair, or paint their nails.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/22 07:04 PM
42

This reminds me of the book You Just Don't Understand by Tannen. At one point she talks about how a public school system in the US plotted the grades of students by age. They noticed that a certain age the girl's average grades in math and science went down while the boy's average grades stayed the same. They scratched their heads and couldn't figure it out. Then they brought in a sociologist, a woman, who Tannen said gave the correct analysis, which is that at that age the girls were entering p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/22 07:01 PM
1

r/justneckbeardthings/
/r/MensRights20/08/22 07:42 PM
1

I finally went back and figured out what I was asking about (the version that hadn't been recompressed). Here they are. The one I saw is in this list somewhere. https://www.google.com/search?q=hjernevask
/r/MensRights08/08/22 05:24 PM
1

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/01/us-prison-officials-alabama-female-journalists-change-clothes-execution
/r/MensRights01/08/22 09:17 PM
-1

But not a misogynist incel neckbeard rapist?
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 08:25 PM
7

"Perfect hair and skin" Feminists are forever complaining about men objectifying them and yet they're obsessed with objectifying themselves.
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 02:41 AM
1

She's got some twisty grammar going there.
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 02:23 AM
3

Women take longer and sometimes there can be a line waiting for the restroom. Only misogynistic incel rapists would think that women should have to wait in line when the men's room is free. /s If you see a woman coming out of the unisex bathroom you could go into it and leave the toilet seat down and piss all over it.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 02:20 AM
1

(and easily circumvented) I thought that that from my first post would be a helpful clue.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 04:16 AM
2

or am I missing something? 🤣
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 04:14 AM
67

Well, as I keep saying, women don't naturally use analysis. They "think" with their emotions.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 04:04 AM
15

With women, the more stupid it sounds, the more likely it is to be true.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 03:50 AM
9

Well DUH! The bottom drawing is simply showing how easy it is to circumvent the design.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 03:45 AM
61

Only a stupid woman could come up with this braindead (and easily circumvented) design.
/r/AntiFeminists26/07/22 02:18 AM
9

Plus my usual argument, that a lack of rational analysis is an integral foundation with their thinking.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/22 01:56 AM
9

There's an opportunity here for creative guys to make a prank account and come up with stupid things like this to blame on the "patriarchy" and post it on the usual feminist subs and watch it get upvotes into the stratosphere. Women are so gullible that you'd probably not be able to make the "tools" as stupid as you'd think would work.
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 05:19 PM
53

Sorry, that won't work. They want to wear skimpy halter tops and have as much exposed skin as possible. And God forbid any man should ogle their cleavage.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:34 AM
2

Google it and see if there are still links to it.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:53 AM
5

Who remembers "fart raping"?
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:31 AM
3

Be thankful you were banned. They're saving you the time you would have wasted trying to have a minimally intelligent discussion with them. They aren't going to listen or learn from anyone who asks questions that don't agree with their dialogue.
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 09:59 PM
11

There are ones that aren't annoying?
/r/AntiFeminists01/07/22 06:09 PM
1

Doesn't that defense bill need congress's approval? Guess what'll happen there?
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 11:39 PM
12

I think he's confused about basic genetics. If they're using women's bone marrow, how would they ever get a male baby?
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 04:03 AM
18

Don't forget that the feminists believe that we're born with nothing in our brains. No preferences, instincts, and especially no gender specific things; totally a blank slate. So starting with that it's easy for them to blame men for all of the women's bad behaviors since the so-called male patriarchy controls everything.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:54 AM
1

Could also be that they have homeless people in the area. Guys hooking up in a starbucks restroom probably isn't that likely.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:34 PM
7

Ok, that made me laugh. Perfect answer.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter