TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

menareangrynow Archive

View 35 posts and 600 comments by menareangrynow on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
174

menareangrynow/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:47 AM
101

menareangrynow/r/MensRights08/03/11 10:10 PM
91

menareangrynow/r/MensRights09/06/11 10:58 AM
61

menareangrynow/r/MensRights13/08/10 01:36 PM
40

menareangrynow/r/MensRights03/08/10 10:26 PM
36

menareangrynow/r/MensRights01/09/10 10:33 PM
33

menareangrynow/r/MensRights11/03/11 07:57 PM
33

menareangrynow/r/MensRights05/08/10 10:31 AM
29

menareangrynow/r/MensRights23/01/11 01:29 PM
26

menareangrynow/r/MensRights17/04/11 11:50 PM
21

menareangrynow/r/MensRights28/02/11 08:34 AM
20

menareangrynow/r/MensRights02/03/11 11:58 PM
19

menareangrynow/r/MensRights31/07/10 11:49 AM
19

menareangrynow/r/MensRights02/04/11 11:18 PM
18

menareangrynow/r/MensRights09/09/10 07:48 AM
18

menareangrynow/r/MensRights17/04/11 01:25 PM
17

menareangrynow/r/MensRights24/10/10 03:00 AM
17

menareangrynow/r/MensRights26/08/10 08:16 AM
16

menareangrynow/r/MensRights25/04/11 12:53 AM
14

menareangrynow/r/MensRights02/09/10 12:55 AM
10

menareangrynow/r/MensRights27/02/11 11:01 PM
9

menareangrynow/r/MensRights01/03/11 08:22 PM
8

menareangrynow/r/MensRights02/08/10 01:00 PM
8

menareangrynow/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:26 AM
8

menareangrynow/r/MensRights10/04/11 03:08 AM
8

menareangrynow/r/MensRights05/07/11 09:22 PM
6

menareangrynow/r/MensRights04/09/10 04:18 PM
5

menareangrynow/r/MensRights27/06/11 09:29 AM
5

menareangrynow/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:16 PM
3

menareangrynow/r/MensRights12/05/11 05:43 AM
3

menareangrynow/r/MensRights05/07/11 11:14 PM
2

menareangrynow/r/MensRights30/08/10 01:44 AM
1

menareangrynow/r/MensRights05/07/11 09:18 PM
0

menareangrynow/r/MensRights31/07/10 12:22 PM
0

menareangrynow/r/MensRights07/10/10 07:47 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Basically no one here is sexist, though you will probably encounter a good amount of trolls, like most areas of the internet.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 01:21 PM
5

The movie has nothing to do with us, i.e. the MRM.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 07:25 AM
1

The selective service registration card in my wallet disagrees.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 06:52 AM
1

Ambivalence over this isn't right. After all, it is a life & death issue. The largest mass graves in the world are the ones filled with the bodies of boys drafted in wars. "Time in the army could help youths prove to employers they can work" And what employer would hire someone because they were a soldier? Maybe the police, but it isn't really a marketable thing. They'd be economically better off actually pursuing a serious career rather than doing a stint in the military. "or help them get jobs…
/r/MensRights06/07/11 06:51 AM
1

My understanding from my German friends, unless there has been a misunderstanding, is that previously, German men had to serve in the armed forces for a year. The government offered several alternatives to conscientious objectors like the Ziveldienst, but every male had to serve in some fashion. Did I misunderstand them? Do you know something they didn't?
/r/MensRights06/07/11 06:44 AM
1

You mean you're pro-conscription as long as both genders are drafted?
/r/MensRights05/07/11 10:19 PM
1

Yeah Deutschland! Now German men can go straight to Uni after finishing secondary school without having to waste a year, risking getting murdered. :)
/r/MensRights05/07/11 09:34 PM
1

"More suicides for feminism, more sacrifices!" Come again?? What on earth does any of that have to do with the blog post we were linked to??
/r/MensRights05/07/11 08:14 PM
0

"If you checked the stats for very recent years (unlikely available for 2011, but maybe for 2010), you would likely see that many more men are going back to school because the construction boom is over." I've posted the recent data below from the National Center for Education Statistics, and men aren't going to school in greater numbers. Also, construction constitutes a small portion of the economy and it employs few. If there has been a cut in construction jobs, then it hasn't effected many. Sp…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:56 PM
1

If anyone wants the raw data, curtsey of the National Center for Education Statistics, here you go: Men are only 40% of college students http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d08/ch_3.asp Women constitute 60% of college degrees http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/tables/dt07_258.asp
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:33 PM
2

Tons of them really aren't, but the ones that are are simply insane.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 12:30 PM
1

"First, there aren't that many cases of forcible rape by women on men. Part of it is due to low incidence," That's not true at all. Actually there are actually millions of cases of rapes against men. According to the National Institute of Justice, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2,782,440 men will be rape victims in our life time, in the US alone. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/172837.pdf And remember, this is only based on what is reported and what even counts in the respective legal…
/r/MensRights30/06/11 12:27 PM
3

It's not something to be ashamed of, but it's certainly not good for you in the long run. Don't measure your self value by your income, but know that you need to be able to support yourself.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 09:36 AM
1

"kloo has his faults but he's not a feminist." You do realize I was saying the same thing you are, yes?
/r/MensRights28/06/11 09:18 AM
-1

"if you think im lying about mrs kloo causing drama" No, I think you're being a hypocrite. Yo, Kloo2yoo, why don't you defend yourself from these impertinent and paranoid idiots? Don't leave this solely to us. Don't let them slander you...
/r/MensRights28/06/11 12:41 AM
1

Like I said, you illiterate twat, From what I've seen they're not supremicists. I haven't looked at their comment histories, and you're more than free to link us to some gems, rather than just making baseless accusations without any proof. "Fuck you. And fuck this subreddit if people like you are going to accomodate them and make excuses" Fuck you. I'm not making excuses, I'm just being level and fair.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 12:34 AM
1

"A marxist pretends to lead the opposition." You know he's a socialist how? And so what if he is? "The problem here is once again kloo2yoo is making drama." You say that as you slander him relentlessly...
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:51 PM
0

"LOL, kloo2yoo...Your marxist feminist power tripping dogma is showing yet again." Kloo2yoo isn't a feminist. Where on earth did you even get this? He accuses them of being in a conspiracy against men, for crying out loud. "I wouldnt be the least bit surprised to find out youre a raging female feminist." So what if our mod is female or a feminist? Why are these automatically bad things?
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:40 PM
1

From what I've seen, they're not supremacists, just ethnocentrists. Not necessarily a good thing, but not as bad as what you seem to think they are. Are they trying to derail this subreddit by adding in unrelated issues? Yes. Do I welcome them? No. So don't say I "accommodate such reprehensible views", you prick. You've never even talked to me before, so how on earth can you claim to know what views I have?
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:34 PM
0

"I think we are finally waking up to the simple fact that supporting men's rights but opposing white rights is a logical absurdity." Who was ever against equal rights for whites in the first place here?? To quote the old motto of this subreddit "We support the rights of everyone, but fight for the rights of men and boys."
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:23 PM
1

"Not this drama-causing man-bashing feminist posing as an MRA." Kloo2yoo isn't a man-basher or a feminist. Where did you even get that?? The only thing that's right in your post is that he is drama-prone.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:12 PM
1

"New Men's rights group: without the Marxism.." Where have you seen socialists on this subreddit?
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:08 PM
0

"Are you really so brainwashed by political correctness that you can't acknowledge the obvious fact that most of us here are white men?" It's not so obvious. Have you even seen the faces or genitalia of any other people on this site? I didn't think so...are you so hastily assumptious that you'd blindly ignore the fact that you're just guessing out of your ass? What are the odds that most of the people here are a minority? They're not good.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 11:13 AM
0

"what's wrong with acknowledging that most of us, in fact, are white men?" You know this how? "Is that something to be ashamed of?" One's race and gender aren't something to be ashamed of. However, none of us know the race and gender of anyone else on this subreddit. You're just making assumptions.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:38 AM
2

Actually, men are 85%, not 99%, of the homeless according to the United States Conference of Mayors: http://usmayors.org/HHSurvey2007/hhsurvey07.pdf
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:22 AM
-2

"As white men, we need..." Who said everyone in this reddit is white or a man? "Attacking white people" What's being proposed isn't an attack. It's better described as pandering to the insecurities of others, really.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:18 AM
2

Damage control is better handled by yelling at bigots and calling them out, than making superficial and skin-deep changes to the way this subreddit looks.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:09 AM
4

"There is no need to change a logo to 'prove we aren't discriminatory'." More to the point, actions speak louder than words. It doesn't matter what our logo is. Our proof of being decent and non-discriminatory shouldn't come from a drawing. That's just bells and whistles, we should strive to be that way in our dealings with others. To me, it's weak minded to lean on symbolism, instead of taking action.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:07 AM
3

"we should not/cannot exclude women or blacks or gays or Asians, etc., etc." We shouldn't, which is why it's good that we don't. "That means we can no longer call it Men's Rights" Why call a spade a club? This subreddit is devoted to supporting equal rights for men, so it's name fits perfectly. "or we fall into the same trap as 'feminism' which is named for exactly what it advocates, yet claims to advocate for everyone." This subreddit used to have the phrase, "We support the rights of everyone,…
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:03 AM
3

"It's very necessary, unless you're only concerned with the rights of straight white males, in which case you need to take your ass back to stormfront." We're concerned with the rights of all men, hence our current logo. Take your own stupid ass back to the dark corner of the internet from which you came, troll.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 09:54 AM
2

the current logo of the male sign with an equal sign is really good. Why change it? It's simple and it's message is clear: make men equal. I say keep it. This is a gender subreddit, so why confuse that by changing the logo for 'racial inclusiveness'?
/r/MensRights27/06/11 09:51 AM
1

Because the contention that I was responding to was about the prevalence of female-gendered pejoratives.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 11:39 PM
1

"there has been an overwhelming increase in young girls wearing provacative clothing. It's quite disgusting that their parents allow it." Allow?? What right do have to dictate what they can and can't wear?
/r/MensRights09/06/11 04:28 PM
1

Rape sometimes is a crime of opportunity, and being vulnerable creates opportunities for that crime to occur; however, I don't believe that the amount of cloth you wear constitutes a vulnerability. It's just clothing. Vulnerabilities would be things like being alone or not being armed. These circumstances make it easier for one to be raped, because they create opportunities for that to happen. If your defenseless and you don't have anyone to help you, then you are pretty vulnerable. It doesn't m…
/r/MensRights09/06/11 04:22 PM
-4

"but could we at least try to speak the common language without descending into vulgarity?" Fuck that. ^
/r/MensRights09/06/11 02:08 PM
0

"We live in a society, and every society has established norms of acceptable dress." So? Norms are not automatically ethical, they're just prevalent. "Parents don't want their sons walking around showing underwear." Some don't. For the ones that do, they need to learn how little that matters- how much they're making of absolutely nothing. "Nor do they want teenage girls showing most of their breasts in public." Same as above. It doesn't matter. I'm guessing your American right, and probably have…
/r/MensRights09/06/11 02:00 PM
-5

Given the way the search function works on Reddit, this measure can't be more complete. Also, I'm not making an argument, I'm responding to one I've heard at another subreddit.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:50 PM
2

"But forget about rape, girls who dress like some of the girls in the Slut Walk don't attract serious men." And? What if they don't? Why is that a concern? Why do you assume that they even want to attract a male mate? What about lesbians or asexuals? Also, what's wrong with not wanting a relationship? What if they want unserious men because they're unserious, and they just want an all-nighter, or something? "Responsible parents admonish their daughters about their dress all the time because pare…
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:43 PM
-5

Oh absolutely, but this is only a measure of the frequency of use of these words, as the contention against this reddit is that it is filled with such language. Apparently, that assertion is a little unfounded.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:23 PM
-1

"I attempted to in my edit, which it's possible you didn't see." Yeah, I didn't see it at the time.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:17 PM
-4

"it's worth looking at as a flag for potentially offensive intent." Then I did understand you right, and I stand by what I said. That is indeed a bias on the part of the listener. Individual words are just soundbites. Their true meanings are only expressed when they are put together. Words' meanings are derived from the other words around them. People who get caught up on individual words are weak minded. Individual words aren't 'flags' for intent, because intent can only be determined with any …
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:15 PM
-2

Explain it differently then, if you feel I didn't get it.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:08 PM
2

OK, then I missed something. I still don't see where you said that, but I'll take your word for it. You have no right to be telling me and other men what to wear, just like you have no right to be telling women what to wear. What makes you think you're entitled to have a voice in that matter? Why don't you have respect for others autonomy?
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:04 PM
2

Explain. Why do you find this a working and fitting analogy? I don't see it.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:00 PM
3

Sometimes it is. Sometimes it isn't. Every situation is different. However, dressing scantily isn't going to make opportunities for rapists. It's just cloth. It's not a relevant factor. Vulnerability, on the other hand, is going to make a lot of opportunities.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 01:00 PM
-5

Then that's a bias on the part of the listener. What's being said solely hinges on what's being communicated, not word choice. Expressing my opinion is a bitch.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:53 PM
1

Different crimes have different motivations. It's not a sound analogy.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:43 PM
-6

You're interpreting what I said literally. Put another way, words are just words. Singling out specific words is pointless. It's what's actually being said by the speaker that matters, not word choice.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:38 PM
-1

I did, why did you assume that I didn't? All things considered, I can't see why anyone would take so much issue with these marches as to proclaim a boycott on them. You list two reasons why people shouldn't attend the events. Firstly, you take issue with the fact that a lot of the protesters aren't fully dressed. I just simply don't get that. What is it to you what clothes, if any, they wear? You denounce these protests as "manifestations of ranche culture", but why is ranche culture bad? Why ca…
/r/MensRights09/06/11 12:18 PM
0

Why should they be boycotted? I think they're pretty cool.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 11:48 AM
6

"Not to mention how many times the words rapist or deadbeat are thrown around." Why is using those words bad?
/r/MensRights09/06/11 11:35 AM
1

You should have stopped after the first sentence.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 11:30 AM
0

This post would have been more appropriate in r/IAmA. Your love life isn't really what this reddit is all about. That being said, no crying over spilled milk. Since this already here, I was wondering if you had set out to date someone of that particular philopshy, i.e. someone who has similar beliefs, maybe; or, was it that this was an irrelevant fact and you already loved this person?
/r/MensRights09/06/11 11:28 AM
0

When people from r/TwoXChromosomes attack this reddit and its users by saying that it's 'awash' with anti-female language, it's worth reminding them that their reddit has, in only one-third the amount of time, used such language more. p.s. People who get offended by c̶u̶r̶s̶e words are weak minded. Words are just sounds. Be offended by the meanings attached to these sounds, instead. It's the people, not the words, who are sexist.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 11:02 AM
1

No, it would be better if they wouldn't take fucking knives to baby boys' bodies.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 07:23 PM
1

TJ FTW
/r/MensRights02/06/11 09:38 AM
1

No, he's not stereotyping feminists. He's railing against this one crazy one.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 09:38 AM
1

Dude, he's his own agent.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 09:36 AM
1

Yes. That's EXACTLY right. TheAmazingAtheist exists because of feminists. It couldn't possibly be the numerous religious loons that he wanted vlog about/against, because that would be crazy talk. It has to be feminism. Obviously.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 09:36 AM
1

Still wrong. TJ's persona as "TheAmazingAtheist" exists because of a) religious vloggers that pissed him off, like VenomFangX, and b) atheist vloggers that he liked like Brett Keen.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 09:33 AM
11

I would imagine a few are. It's a lot more socially acceptable to be a feminist, though, because they enjoy more publicity, membership, and acceptance; but, there are going to be some that are paired with anti-feminists, and can't really talk about that side of themselves, which is sad.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 06:10 AM
2

Also our descendants will have to worry about spacedingos. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpJZUnB82bQ :3
/r/MensRights19/05/11 08:14 AM
1

"Her hypothesis was sexist." Let me ask you a question. If her hypothesis was sexist for saying that women have it harder, then why do you talk of her results the way you do, by saying it has earned your admiration? Wouldn't it also be then that it's sexist to say that men have it harder, by the same standards? To me, 'sexist' is just the wrong kind of word to be throwing around here like that. I don't think her hypothesis was sexist. I just think it was wrong, and she's said as much.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 07:01 AM
8

This. I wish I could give you more than one up-vote for that comment.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 03:18 PM
6

"They rationalize it by calling it 'benevolent sexism' and claiming it's harmful." I've never actually heard any of them use the phrase 'benevolent sexism' before; but, I can just imagine what would happen to them if they started using the phrase 'benevolent racism'...oh god, these double standards...
/r/MensRights18/05/11 07:32 AM
2

Oh? Oops... I thought it was just what Brits called them, and since I knew a number of them back in the day, it sort of caught on. It sounded kinda cute, for a label, so I just stuck with it. *shrug I should probably go and look into it's etymology. :3
/r/MensRights18/05/11 07:24 AM
7

To "x-post", what you do is go over to a reddit's front page, and look for the button, which says, "submit a link". Click it and it will take you to a page with a few simple questions. It will ask you what title you want for the post, i.e. what will be seen on the front page as the post's header, and last but not least, what the URL of the link you are trying to submit is. Got it? Hopes this helps. :) p.s. If you want to do a text post, i.e. a post without a link, but with only stuff you wrote, …
/r/MensRights18/05/11 06:27 AM
10

"So it would seem that she initially went with this idea because she was trying to justify her sexism, but had her outlook completely changed instead." 'sexism' is kinda strong language for what she was trying to do. She had a 'hypothesis', for lack of a better word, and she wanted to test it. It's way more innocent then you're making it sound. While she may not have been objective from the onset of the project, and I sorta feel that way, she didn't let any biases she had affect her report of th…
/r/MensRights18/05/11 06:20 AM
5

"but to 'live as a boy' and to appear to live as a boy is the same thing, which was my point." Sorry, it doesn't really work like that, I don't think. Take trannies, for example. They appear to live as one gender; but, they've spent at least a portion of their life living like the opposite gender. They have a radically different life experience: they've seen both sides of the fence, but, they haven't spent as much time living as one gender on either side as their peers (similarly aged people fro…
/r/MensRights18/05/11 06:14 AM
3

You seem to have misunderstood what he was saying. He was commenting on how she just got a taste for what it's like, 'cause she's only spent a little time living as a guy, not actually the whole nine yards from birth 'till death. He's saying that she got an inclination of what it's like; but, presumably, she still hasn't seen everything that there is to see. Us actual guys have seen so much more because we've been immersed in the culture as guys from day one, living and breathing what society th…
/r/MensRights18/05/11 05:58 AM
1

For those who are interested, there are actually a number of pro-male parties in a handful of countries: Germany: Der Männerpartei http://www.maennerpartei.eu/ . Switzerland: Der Männerpartei Schweitz http://www.männerpartei.ch/ . Australia: The Men's Party http://members.ozemail.com.au/~irgeo/amp.htm . Please, if you're so inclined, go and check them out, and remember that they're on the ballot, as long as you're in the right place! :)
/r/MensRights18/05/11 03:28 AM
1

Speaking purely for myself, this is why I'm envious of other countries coalitional parliament systems. Different parties can stand up for different things, and the whole group can address a much wider range of issues. Sadly, here in the US, this isn't the case and a single party has to carry the burden of addressing issues that they aren't necessarily expert in, because they are given nearly all the decision making power in the congress. *sigh Not that I'm a one-issue-voter (I don't vote); but, …
/r/MensRights18/05/11 03:25 AM
1

In the US, it is sadly 'normal' in the sense of it being highly prolific and widespread throughout society and culture, with a great deal of emphasis being placed on it as a cultural standard. However, I'm not 'normal', and happily so. Screw social expectations, being weird is good enough for me. After all, who in their right mind wants to take knives to their children, anyway? :) I say they're the unnormal ones.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 03:14 AM
2

Not very hard, from the point of view of the bills drafter; but, most of the country genitally mutilates their sons. When it comes to us, the government is cowardly, and is not willing to stand up for us, by banning something that most of the country participates in. Sadly, we're on our own. We have to be the ones to look after ourselves, because they won't.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 03:08 AM
2

"Something interesting to note is that originally the legislation banning FGM also banned MGM but it got taken off when the legislators realized that it had no chance in hell of passing." It's always going to be a point of contention between me and the government that they abandoned us at the drop of a hat, just for political expediency. Though I shouldn't be surprised, having lived a life where they do that over and over again without end, never willing to stand up for us, this one time hurts m…
/r/MensRights18/05/11 03:05 AM
1

Imma be a devils advocate: Not all feminists do that, and some of the one's who do that are just misinformed about what exactly is involved with male genital mutilation. Considering they deal with women's issues, it's never really been that surprising to me that a lot of them don't know much about this. This all makes them seem heartless and devious, like they're all doing that with perpetuity. I've never gotten that impression, personally. For example, once I was talking with a feminist on Blog…
/r/MensRights18/05/11 03:02 AM
1

"Most fathers continue to CHOOSE to perform the surgery. Most mothers don't care and leave the decision up to the man in the end." Where are the statistics to back up what you've said? Where are the surveys and pulls for who's pushed for circumcision and why? Honestly this just sounds like unsubstantiated stereotyping of fathers, as aggressively for the genital mutilation, when I don't think that anyone can really make that kind of assertion.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 02:50 AM
1

"I consider myself a feminist. I have a boyfriend, a brother, a father, and two very close male friends. They are all amazing people and I love them dearly. I don't hate men." *applause "I think circumcision is wrong. I believe the MRM brings up a lot of valid and important issues. But blaming feminists and assuming we are man-haters does not address any of MR concerns and only promotes intolerance." *more applause and some whistling :)
/r/MensRights18/05/11 02:46 AM
1

Dude, don't be so quick to assign such personal views to individuals who take a title. It's true, some feminists have and do hate men and boys, and everything about us. Some don't. And, some have a lot of love for us, in their hearts. What ever the proportions are, you have to understand this key fact, otherwise you are stereotyping them, and that will not aid in understanding them, or vice-versa. You're not being fair to these individuals. Fairness demands that you judge them unbiasedly, and co…
/r/MensRights18/05/11 02:45 AM
1

"Because I blame whoever is at fault." Fuck you, you dirty bigoted sexist. I had nothing to do with circumcision, and neither did the vast majority of men. Get off this sub reddit. This is not a place for ignorant sexists.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 02:36 AM
1

"The internet" I hate to break it to you; but, female circumcision was outlawed in most countries, before the recent prominence of the internet as a public information exchanging resource. What stopped female circumcision was activism and effort, not the technology they used. Anti-male circumcision activists are using the internet, and they are changing minds; but, it's the activist and the activism, not the tools they use. After all, male-circumcision spread like wildfire across many countries …
/r/MensRights18/05/11 02:33 AM
1

"Cut the bullshit. Circumcision is popular and considered normal because of men...Our generation finally has the ability to do away with this gross cultural tradition and instead we go around playing the blame game. Fuck. That. Shit." I completely agree. Let's cut the bullshit and stop playing the blame-game. It's not just men that have normalized and supported circumcision. Women have done that too, so don't place all the blame on us. I haven't done a damn thing to support it and a lot of other…
/r/MensRights18/05/11 02:24 AM
1

"No, a sexism-based party for either gender..." Why is this, or other gender based parties, automatically sexist? Look at their policies. It seems pretty legit, unless I missed something. Take for example this: "Either parent should be able to look after their children should the need arise." That was under policy 2, 'Child Care'. It seems to me that they're for equal opportunity across the board if you go and read what they want.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 12:05 AM
1

Everyone makes mistakes...nobody's perfect...don't be so harsh. It's not like what you wrote is perfect either. You have omitted commas all over the place. ;p It should read as: "Why, oh why, did you not take the millisecond of time to see, if what you wrote was even a semblance of normalcy before blindly submitting it?"
/r/MensRights17/05/11 11:59 PM
1

I would, tentatively. I don't like political parties; but, any group that is willing to stand up for us is worth my support.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 11:55 PM
1

On my YouTube account's side bar I keep a good set of sourced statistics and research. (And, you're in luck, American Men's Issues are what I specialize in) http://www.youtube.com/menareangrynow Let me know if this helps and if you want more information. Those links are only the tip of the iceberg. I have accumulated a large personal eLibrary of studies, papers, and documents related to gender issues that I can check for you. :) Good luck with the project. Let me know how it turns out, and if th…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 11:25 PM
2

"Thus women should punished HARSHER for statutory rape then men!" No, men and women should receive the same punishments for the same crimes.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 06:03 AM
3

For some context on the comic, it is about re-imagining the character of Adolf Hitler, Germany's dictator during the second world war, to be that of a hipster. In it, both hipster culture and politics are satirized and lampooned. For some context on the period the comic takes place in, Nazi Germany was a place of rigid gender roles, where everyone was assigned specific tasks, and these roles were celebrated even at the state role to promote them. Women were given medals for how many children the…
/r/MensRights12/05/11 05:50 AM
4

Yeah, it discriminates against the unmarried. Would they get away with giving away tax cuts to other groups? (Well, some are trying to get women a tax-cut just for being female, but you get the point: https://menareangrynow.wordpress.com/2011/01/23/european-states-counseled-to-have-men-pay-more-taxes-than-women/)
/r/MensRights19/04/11 07:23 PM
1

"And for the record, sex with underage boys is not necessarily a bad thing. If you're also underage, or are just of age." You're saying an 18 year old woman is fine to fuck a 10 year old boy??
/r/MensRights19/04/11 07:16 PM
2

Oh my god, I feel so sorry for that poor boy. :( I hate it when girls get a way with this kind of stuff, but at least in this case that hasn't really happened, although only one them is being charged as an adult, which I think they both should be for tying him up at knife-point and raping him.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 07:13 PM
7

sorry to hear that happened to you. :(
/r/MensRights18/04/11 12:50 AM
18

And that's what's wrong about this country when it comes to the issue of violence, domestic or otherwise. As long as its males being abused, no one really cares. They'll even support their abusers just because its guys being beaten.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 12:49 AM
1

"Honestly though I see people fighting in the street I leave them too it, normally they want it that way - it's not like assault by a stranger." You can't know that they're not strangers. You're being just as presumptuous as the girl who said that the beaten male deserved it because he probably did something wrong.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 12:47 AM
1

I don't know if its true; but, they mentioned the biographer Gail Sheehy, who wrote "Hillary's Choice". It might be worth it to go and check for what evidence there is there. I hope he never had to go through that, though. :( Hillary is such a sexist swine.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 12:23 AM
2

Apparently there is a 10,000 character limit to making text posts on Reddit, so I've reposted to my blog the previous list we had going, and I have added to it. My blog will now carry the official list, since reddit can't. Keep on suggesting songs to add! Let's aim for as complete of a list as we can possibly manage!
/r/MensRights17/04/11 11:52 PM
2

Apparently there is a 10,000 letter limit on these kinds of posts, which is preventing me from adding other songs to the list, so I'll just repost this on my blog here: https://menareangrynow.wordpress.com/2011/04/17/how-violence-against-men-is-portrayed-in-popular-music-and-popular-culture/ And I'll add the link to this subreddit. (Keep the suggestions coming guys, they're helping a lot!)
/r/MensRights17/04/11 11:48 PM
5

If this list get's long enough, and I'm sure it will when everyone starts helping to build it up, it would make a great addition to this sub reddit's FAQ. What do you say Kloo2yoo?
/r/MensRights17/04/11 01:29 PM
1

"Did I say anything about believing the story? NO. I said their story about 3 months being too late to report was full of shit." Tons of people have problems coming forward and talking to the authorities about lots of different things that have happened to them. It's why people are given many years to report on crimes, under the statute of limitations. Just because someone waited even a year to come forward about something doesn't automatically mean that they're making it up.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 05:50 PM
1

Investigation isn't dismissing someone right out of hand, before you've even done basic tests, like DNA swabs, etc. He said the police wouldn't do anything about what happened to him. They would never get away with that, if they said and did that to a female coming forward about her being raped.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 05:46 PM
2

It's sadly why so many of us never report to the police when we're raped. Men learn from other raped men, that most of the police are useless in this regard, and so when it happens to them, they choose to just bear it in silence. It's really sad. :(
/r/MensRights10/04/11 06:24 AM
2

"I find it hard to believe that you couldn't escape her." Tons of guys can't can't escape their rapists. Is that really so hard to believe? There are tons of guys you can't even bench press a 100 pounds, and guess how much the average female weighs. You might recall that she was on top of him in a strong position with gravity favoring her... "I was in a similar situation" No situation is the exact same. Sorry to hear that some girl tried to rape you.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 06:21 AM
3

Don't joke around about rape. Seriously.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 06:16 AM
3

Fuck you, you retarded troll.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 06:15 AM
5

"Dude if you were being as raped as you say you think you were how come you had an erection?" Fuck you, you idiot. Men get erections unconsciously. He didn't want to get raped. All it takes is physical stimulation. Him having a hard-on doesn't mean he wanted to be raped anymore than some raped girl having hard tits. These are unconscious reactions by the body to physical stimuli, and the mind had no control over them. "Secondly, did you try throwing a fist or anything?" Fuck you, you idiot. He s…
/r/MensRights10/04/11 06:13 AM
2

I'm sorry to hear that that happened to you. *support
/r/MensRights10/04/11 06:06 AM
2

Good news from the Rwandan Judiciary.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 04:05 AM
1

Glad I could elucidate that a little bit for you. cheers
/r/MensRights10/04/11 04:03 AM
2

"If the argument is men have lost their place in modern society and therefore are offing themselves in record number then the suicide rate would actually be increasing faster than women. I just Googled stats and found a Canadian study that shows men's rate of suicide staying steady at 4x that of women for the last 90 years..." You'll find the same thing in American stats going back just as far. I know the studies you're talking about: I've read them. It doesn't mean that men feel disenfranchised…
/r/MensRights06/04/11 04:00 AM
1

I have a hunch that it's harder to find a girl to marry you when you don't have a lot of money. That's not to say that there aren't plenty of girls who don't care about money. It's just pointing out that there are some who do, and that that skews that statistic. I suspect that accounts for it, at least somewhat. It's kind of like saying that married women are more beautiful.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 03:36 AM
3

"As in, men need to have an erection to have vaginal sex but if they are forced against their will, wouldn't they lose their erection? Can a man be aroused against his will?" Yes, a man can have erections forced on him. Erection is an unconscious function of the male body. Males can't just tell their penises to start in-taking blood, like they could tell their hand to grip an object. Just to flesh this out a little more for you, males will often get erections while they are sleeping. Men don't l…
/r/MensRights05/04/11 11:07 PM
2

Thanks. I submitted two links their, and they're not there, so I guess their fascist mods deleted them. I've since re-posted them to r/Egalitarianism. If anyone's curious they were: UNICEF study has shocking findings: vast majority of Northern Pakistani sexual abuse victims are boys, 10.76% of respondents believe that having sex with boys is not bad, 14.04% see it as a status symbol, 22.57% see it as a matter of pride, 82.92% know of adults who keep boys for sexual services http://www.crin.org/d…
/r/MensRights05/04/11 10:55 PM
1

"I can NOT sympathize with men complaining about the draft" Yeah, god forbid they 'complain' about being put on a government registry that will lead to them being striped away from their friends and family in wartime and sent off to die. Why would anyone ever complain about that? Fucking whiners... "No one seems to be complaining about the fact that the vast majority of business are chaired and ran by men." I was a bit busy 'complaining' about how men constitute 82.2% of all job deaths (The Fede…
/r/MensRights05/04/11 10:43 PM
1

"You can start simple and just put up a flyer like 'tired of misandry? Visit x'." That wouldn't really work, with that wording. Almost no one knows what the word "misandry" means; but, putting up posters is always a good way to spread one's message.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 10:08 PM
7

When I was 18, I had to sign up for the draft. That's when I knew men didn't have the same rights as women.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 10:02 PM
3

"But I would think that the statement: 'The reason men are so down-trodden' is quite a bit of an exagguration." Depends on who you ask. There actually a lot of down-trodden men out there. There is something to the statement. For example, men's suicide rate is actually 4 times greater than women's. Personally, I'm happy-go-lucky; but, I know a lot of guys who are really depressed. :(
/r/MensRights05/04/11 09:56 PM
1

Could you take some pictures of these advertisements and post them here?
/r/MensRights04/04/11 04:23 AM
5

"the mrm IS NOT about hating women you fucking half wit, it is about f̶i̶g̶h̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶l̶i̶e̶s̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶f̶e̶m̶i̶n̶i̶s̶m helping men." There, I improved your comment, by adding in the highest priority prerogative of the movement.
/r/MensRights04/04/11 02:40 AM
1

This reddit is listed on my favorites, on the side bars to the the right. I'm surprised you didn't notice it.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 12:32 PM
1

Asking won't do much. lol. This is who they are, and I don't care to give them a target to vent their immature aggression. If you wanna talk with me, on the other hand, though, I'd love to have a discussion with you. Email, works best, and you can reach me at [email protected] 'till then, or not at all. Whatever works for you, really. And, thanks for your well wishes, by the way. Good luck with your projects.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 12:29 PM
0

"False Rape Society is what it is, and if some people don't like it, I respect that." It's not that I don't like what you do. To be honest, standing up to slander is always a good cause. It's just not a men's issue, IMO.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 02:29 AM
-2

"For you to say that FRS 'never talk about men's issues' but 'they just talk about people lying to the police' is astoundingly incorrect. They post multiple posts every week raising awareness about a particularly nasty thing that happens almost exclusively to men." You know what else also happens to men on a daily basis? Being robbed. Should I have anti-thievery sites on the list just because they raise awareness about that crime? For it to be a men's issue, their has to be a gender angle. For f…
/r/MensRights03/04/11 02:25 AM
1

Thanks for digging up the link. I'll probably have his tag changed to just 'M', then.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 02:19 AM
-1

"I think they are integral to the MRM as they are concerned with men's rights, which includes the rights of falsely accused." Should we then be concerning ourselves with all manner of civil rights issues, rather than just the ones that directly impact men? How are they concerned with men's rights?
/r/MensRights03/04/11 02:11 AM
1

"Bad advice for men, better to learn game." Why do you bring up bad dating advice, like that's important or relevant?
/r/MensRights03/04/11 02:08 AM
1

"Wrong. That's a big omission. They are probably the one site that feminists hate the most, because they are real smart and real uncompromising. They are bastards with nasty tempers." Why is it an omission? Why do feminist's opinions matter? Should I put up sites on that list just because feminists don't like them? It's a list of men's websites, not the enemies list for feminists.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 02:02 AM
0

"How on earth can you say that?" I can say that, because they never talk about men's issues. They just talk about people lying to the police.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 01:55 AM
-2

"Besides, the author of Toy Soldiers says his isn't an MRA site." Is that so? Could you dig up that link for me?
/r/MensRights03/04/11 01:52 AM
0

"What, did they delete a comment of yours or something?" Never commented there.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 01:52 AM
0

Well apparently, this comment of yours was deleted; but, here's my response anyways: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Who are you, and why would anyone give this list any credence?" I'm me. Who are you? Take or leave the list. It's up to you. The list has merit, because it is categorized unlike the other link collections out there on the same subject, and also more extensive than almost every other one.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 01:51 AM
-2

They're not a part of the men's movement. Why would they be there?
/r/MensRights03/04/11 01:04 AM
0

"also, you're welcome to raid my dv resource list" Thanks, I'll take a look at them later. Eventually, the ones I don't have already listed will find their way onto the list, as I review them.
/r/MensRights03/04/11 01:03 AM
0

"I didn't find the fiebert bibliography there" That's not a website. It's part of Mr. Fiebert's professatorial stub on the main CSU Long Beach website, here: http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/
/r/MensRights03/04/11 12:59 AM
1

No I haven't read their manifesto. Another reason to go back and review their site...
/r/MensRights03/04/11 12:15 AM
0

The rough definitions for all of these things were hammered out here, when I first began my site almost two years ago: https://menareangrynow.wordpress.com/terminology/ I've been contemplating changes to this section; but, it has been and is the matrix from which I've drawn my definitions for my other projects up 'til now. If you have any suggestions, I'd love to them.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 11:54 PM
2

I pride myself on my research abilities. :)
/r/MensRights02/04/11 11:40 PM
0

Mislabeling is always a possibility. I'm not perfect. The categories are a little broad, but so is the subject at hand. Also, any labels I apply, are subject to the time I reviewed each individual site. The 'Men's Movement' label on Manhood 101 comes from about a year ago, from before the old head of their site was replaced with the two lunatics we all know and hate, actually. I need to go and re-review their site at some point in the future. It's changed a lot, since I originally put it on my l…
/r/MensRights02/04/11 11:34 PM
2

I'm always working on this part of my website; but, I think it has gotten good enough to be announced publicly. I'll still be improving it in the future, though, as you can see. I still have more sites to review, more links to categorize, and several sections to expand. But, as it stands now, it's extremely authoritative. I hope you all find it a useful resource. :)
/r/MensRights02/04/11 11:22 PM
3

Here here. :)
/r/MensRights12/03/11 02:00 AM
9

"the post was fetish porn, nothing else." I don't think you know what fetish porn is...
/r/MensRights11/03/11 10:35 PM
11

I hereby petition on the posters behalf, for the immediate reinstatement of his account. This was not porn, and can not be said to be or construed as such. It was not an image intended to induce or elicit a sexual response. It was from http://verydemotivational.memebase.com/ , Which is a site that creates pictures that are intended to be funny and play a part in internet culture, particularly meme culture. It is an affiliate of the Cheezburger Blog Group (http://cheezburger.com/sites) , which al…
/r/MensRights11/03/11 10:34 PM
11

That only applies to women...get with the program, geeeeze... ~~ Otherwise we could chose not to be circumcised or sent to war.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 10:04 PM
0

The politically correct definition of "sexism" is "anything that upsets a woman (regardless of validity)" Well, at the very least, Merriam Websters defines it from a gynocentric point of view: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g25aq/merriam_webster_defines_sexism_as_prejudice_or/
/r/MensRights11/03/11 07:59 PM
5

"False accusations are rape." No, false accusations are slander. Rape is when you force someone else to have sex, through violence and/or manipulation. Don't denigrate either crime by conflating them...
/r/MensRights11/03/11 07:46 PM
0

What they didn't all fall down the stairs?? *sarcasm
/r/MensRights11/03/11 07:44 PM
1

"Equal doesn't mean the same. Four quarters equal a dollar bill, but that doesn't mean there aren't difference." What do you mean? ¢100=¢100...
/r/MensRights11/03/11 07:35 PM
9

"Well... yeah. The number of rape apologists in here is astounding." Fuck anyone who excuses bad things happening to others. They are heartless bastards. "No wonder so many young women are afraid to report sexual assault." ...and old women, and men of all ages, as well as children of either gender. Young women aren't the only ones who are raped, you know, as rantgrrl already commented on. "You guys know everyone outside this reddit hates you right?" And...?
/r/MensRights11/03/11 07:21 AM
8

"I've seen people on here call for imprisonment for false rape accusers." So calling for the arrest of those, who have lied to the police and authorities is a bad thing? If I were to have claimed that someone committed a crime against me, and it's provable that I lied, with malice aforethought, should I not be sent to jail? Let's say I, provably, falsely said that someone robbed me. Would sending me to jail, discourage others from reporting muggings? I don't know, but, if I wasn't sent to jail, …
/r/MensRights11/03/11 07:17 AM
-1

"Reddit does have a lot of (yes, male) users who are apparently fond of feeling like victims." Men are victims...we're treated as second class citizens. We're mutilated at birth, by what is called 'circumcision', and we're refused entry into domestic violence shelters, just because we have penises. In war time, we're rounded up and sent off cattle-style in trains to be shot, and in popular culture and the media we're mocked and stereotyped as unclean, stupid, and dangerous.
/r/MensRights11/03/11 07:00 AM
1

"COME ON! Seriously guys!" Super cereal >:( "I'm all for mensrights but you must understand there are biological differences here. Men are more suitable for combat than woman on average." There are a tons of women more suited to serve than I am. I'm not strong or fast. Why does is it that because I have a penis, I'm expected to risk death? "Also, if you have 100 woman and 100 men, you only need to keep one lucky man to impregnate the 100 woman, you can't do that the other way around which is why…
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:15 AM
1

Well said and true, sadly enough...
/r/MensRights10/03/11 04:21 AM
2

"It's fucking sick.... it's currently International Women's Day 2" No it's not. Look at these two sites, and see for yourself. The day is about celebrating men and boys and highlighting biases and discrimination against them. It is our day. http://www.internationalmensday.com/ http://www.international-mens-day.com/
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:37 AM
5

1 punch rule is better. If someone attacks you, don't hesitate to defend yourself.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:25 AM
0

"I would seriously consider giving an apology for hitting as hard as I did" Why? Would you apologize to a weak mugger, because he/she was stupid enough to pick a fight with you? It's not your fault that you hit harder. It's her fault for hitting you repeatedly in the first place. She wouldn't have even been hit, had she not assaulted you. Don't let anyone tell you differently. You have an absolute right to self defense, not a right to defend yourself meagerly. The only reason people are telling …
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:23 AM
0

"It's up to you to decide if you'll apologize before your sister, but in my own opinion, a matter of principle shouldn't come before family." Would you tell a battered wife that family matters come before matters of principle, out of curiosity? And, what kind of a family lets its older members abuse it younger members? Not apoligizing is a family matter. He has to make it clear that he won't put up with being abused, that others assaulting him is something that he won't allow. If they can't resp…
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:13 AM
3

If I'm getting all of this right, then you have no reason to apologize. You defended yourself from physical assault from your older sibling. Your family should be making her apologize to you, and that's a fact. Saying "Don't hit girls" to this or anything like this, is just a sexist and bigoted way to excuse violence against men, which you went through. You have a right to self defense. Just because you aren't female, doesn't mean you should have to put up with physical abuse. Tell them this, th…
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:06 AM
2

Source?
/r/MensRights10/03/11 02:56 AM
1

Thanks a lot for checking for me, anyway. :)
/r/MensRights08/03/11 09:36 PM
3

"Women are the problem, and you're too ignorant to see it." You forgot to mention how they control all the banks... ~~ Honestly you sound like 'effing Hitler, when he was ranting about Jews. What's your solution to the female problem???1 Hmmm???1 ~~ Wir müssen die Frauen aufräumen!!!1 (and yes, screw Godwin's Law)
/r/MensRights07/03/11 11:41 AM
1

"bigot off, you fool." English, motherfucker! Do you speak it?!
/r/MensRights07/03/11 11:25 AM
2

"Just because I think women as a group misbehave, doesnt mean you can transfer that to blacks, or jews, or any other group." The hell I can't. All I did was change the gender references to race references: the same thing I've done when others have said sexist things about men. If you don't like the way it came out, it's because you actually can recognize a bigoted statement, when it comes to race. Work on recognizing bigotry in statements about gender. Any group is comparable; because, at the en…
/r/MensRights07/03/11 11:24 AM
0

"No, not ALL of them do, just the majority. Thats the problem." The only problem here is the bigoted statements which stereotype the high-hell out of women.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 11:14 AM
2

"MISOGYNY! MISOGYNY! misogyny is a reaction to female bad behaviour." Let's do a thought experiment, shall we? Let's replace your references to gender with race, so we get something like: 'White power is a reaction to blacks misbehaving' Tell me, how does it sound to you, and what would it imply about a person who said this about one group along with matching race-based versions of all of what you've said? Now tell me, how do you think you sound, and what do you think is implied about you, when …
/r/MensRights07/03/11 11:10 AM
0

" 'most of any group doesn't bring misery to those around them' Correct. With the exception of women." *Facepalm I don't know who you're hanging out with, but might I suggest not trying to get chummy with only female ex-convicts (I don't know who else you could have met to make you think this way about most women). It may help you get a more complete picture of what women are like, rather than the petty and spiteful demonettes you seem to think they are.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 11:02 AM
1

Apparently the post that this was supposed to reply to got deleted; but, here it is anyway: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "So let me get this straight. You dont think women cause more problems in day to day life than men?" a) That's not even remotely close to anything that I've said. b) hell if I know, who causes more problems. I just know that most people aren't causing problems, as demonstrated by crime statistics among other things.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 10:57 AM
0

"I know women all too well." It's really showing up in what you have to say about them... ~~ "You dont understand the female mind. And you dont understand female nature." You don't understand the human mind nor human nature. Most people are good. Most people would never hurt others. You ever wonder why the crime statistics are always measured in the 100,000s? It's because they need that large of a cross section just to find any criminals at all.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 10:51 AM
1

"And its telling that women take their frustrations out on the people they supposedly love, the people closest to them." Not all of them do that. *facepalm
/r/MensRights07/03/11 10:37 AM
4

"Most women DO make other peoples live a misery, ask married men." You fucking bigot. No, most of any group doesn't bring misery to those around them. Most people are good and pleasant to be around. You'll meet some jackasses in life; but, certainly not the majority of people you'll meet. As for married men, lots aren't unhappy. The divorce rate is 50%, not 99.99%; and, 66% of the divorces were filed from women, not men. It seems to me that there's a very strong likelihood that more than half of…
/r/MensRights07/03/11 10:36 AM
4

And you do, mister never met anyone from my group of friends?
/r/MensRights07/03/11 10:31 AM
5

"Women want resources, men go and get them. Its very simple." No it's 'effing not. Human psychology is incredibly complicated. There aren't words for the kind of ridiculous simplification that that is. "you can see it at the individual couple level." Micro≠Macro. In addition, not every relationship is like that. "Its a part of female hypergamy." Female what now? "If women wanted to stop the starving in the third world they could simply instruct men to do it. And it would stop by the end of the w…
/r/MensRights07/03/11 10:30 AM
2

"I'm thinking of 'I had a nightmare last night and now I'm going to make you pay all fucking day for something you didnt actually do'." What you're thinking of is still a stereotype that isn't true. Not every woman takes her frustrations out on the people around her. A lot of them have self control, and some of the ones who don't will take it out on inanimate objects, like stress balls, before people.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 10:10 AM
4

"Yet he doesnt understand that its women behind the problem, including war." Don't place collective blame on an entire gender, for war and other problems. That's just wrong and irresponsible.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 09:57 AM
2

Don't stereotype women that way. Some women are emotionally unsound. I know tons who aren't.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 09:50 AM
2

Also, for movies, here's a good one: The Disappearing Male http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3450754654538943# It's a Canadian documentary about how chemicals like Byphenol-A (a plastic softener) are disrupting the male reproductive and endocrine systems.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 09:43 AM
7

"Where is the consistency?" Consistency favors the favored.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 09:09 AM
18

This article doesn't surprise me coming from the same guy who wrote this little diatribe on why it'd be great if there were only women: http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/4554 That guy just hates us, and fuck him for it.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 09:07 AM
1

I see. Can you look at your blacklist for me, and tell me if there's a URL that looks like it's pertinent. Thanks in advance, and I appreciate you getting back to me so quickly. :)
/r/MensRights07/03/11 08:52 AM
1

what URL did you enter into the blacklist, for adblocker?
/r/MensRights07/03/11 08:16 AM
2

I'm saying this, because the poster implied that International Women's Day is a bad thing. If that was the intention, then I'd like to disagree. There are sexist things against women, in many countries. For example, the French law that banned women wearing certain religious clothing, or the Irani law that forbids women singing in public. This is a day to bring these subjects to the forefront. It's no different from International Men's Day (except that almost no countries recognize International …
/r/MensRights07/03/11 07:54 AM
2

Just as a piece of advice, don't limit it to just amazon. There are lots of books that never made it to print, either intentionally or otherwise. For example, there's one interesting one that's being completed right now, here: https://masculinityconspiracy.wordpress.com/ eBooks can be really educational, but they often don't get the press they deserve. Scribed has some amazing authors and minds at work. You just have to look around. Here's one that I stumbled upon. I haven't gotten around to rea…
/r/MensRights07/03/11 07:49 AM
2

Check out my book list. It is fairly authoritative, in terms of percentage of the male-oriented gender issue books that are out there. I don't have every title; but, I have a lot of them. I've been building up my list for a year, and updating it constantly.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 07:41 AM
11

Just so everyone knows, in case they didn't already, November 19th is our day. http://www.internationalmensday.com/
/r/MensRights07/03/11 07:38 AM
1

Read it and weap. (pun intended) ;)
/r/MensRights07/03/11 06:09 AM
2

WEBSITES: https://menareangrynow.wordpress.com/listing/ plus my own of course: https://menareangrynow.wordpress.com/ LITERATURE: (note on the following: not all books listed hereafter are that important. They all deal with gender issues, often from a male point of view or sympathy, which makes them mentionable books, not necessarily all useful or good books) -Truth and Prejudice, by Edith Crawford. -Honor versus the Amazonian World: (Effeminate Leadership by the Chattering Classes), by Mitchell …
/r/MensRights07/03/11 06:07 AM
0

These are really interesting studies and research. Thanks for posting these.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 11:42 PM
1

EDIT: accidental double post
/r/MensRights03/03/11 11:37 PM
1

"So where are the women preventing these rapes?" Haven't you heard?? Only men can prevent rape. Gosh, get with the program... ;)
/r/MensRights03/03/11 11:37 PM
3

All say. It's a really good article, and the New York Times has a huge readership base, so many people will be hearing about the raped males in war-zones for the first time. It's a shame that links like this get pushed to the back of the reddit, before many people get to see it here. But right now, it's getting some attention, and that will make it more noticeable on the front page.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 11:34 PM
1

"...so he won't grow up to be one." That's quite an assumption to make...
/r/MensRights03/03/11 11:08 PM
3

If I'm not mistaken, this was the article that the poster wanted us to see. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/02/opinion/02stemple.html?_r=1 It's all a matter of knowing how to manipulate the URL.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 10:46 PM
1

I'm still going to college actually, but yeah, I hear you. Liberal arts schools are awesome this way. The professors aren't close-minded and you aren't just a number. If a professor were to persecute a student, everyone on campus would know about it.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 10:27 PM
2

Depends on the professor. As long as you have good sources to back you up, most will be cool with a paper like this. It's all in the execution, no matter the subject.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 07:39 AM
3

There's tons of issues out there for subject matter. Tell me what you think of the research links that I have on my YouTube channel sidebar: http://www.youtube.com/menareangrynow If you want to look more into any particular subject, I'd be happy to give you more research material, if I have it. My channel's links are just the starters, from my over-bloated bookmarks section in my browser. :D
/r/MensRights03/03/11 06:46 AM
1

I'm such a slave-driver, I know. ;)
/r/MensRights03/03/11 06:21 AM
2

I don't know why you got so many downvotes. Your post was filled with interesting medical information. *upvoting
/r/MensRights03/03/11 12:36 AM
2

Interesting tid-bit of news. No idea if it's credible though, but the article is worth a look. Very poignant considering yesterday's (controversial?) decision by the EU high court to ban sexual discrimination in auto insurance premiums. After all, insurance companies claimed that men were more accident prone as a group, and thus charged all men more than women for the same services.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 12:01 AM
-1

Strawman nothing, he outright said it.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 06:47 AM
4

"Yes, but the subject mentioned was 'activism' as a whole. That includes rhetoric." Ranting about how awful and sexist it is that domestic violence shelters exclude men, the government drafts men, boys aren't protected from genital mutilation, etc. is primarily motivated by misogyny?
/r/MensRights02/03/11 06:46 AM
0

"Uhh, I'm sure MensRights is happy about this, but does this really make sense? Should insurance companies charge old people the same as young too? Because otherwise it would be a discrimination of people regarding their age." Yes they should. Ageism is wrong too, for the exact same reasons that sexism is wrong. OK, men crash more than women. Why should someone be charged more because they have a penis then? I know plenty of great drivers who are male. And I know some crap drivers who are female…
/r/MensRights01/03/11 10:21 PM
0

Viva the European Union. :)
/r/MensRights01/03/11 10:12 PM
2

Another reason to think that he is among the biggest jerkasses of all time.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 09:45 PM
3

k. I know that some of their readership are sexist and racist, I've personally seen and yelled at the fuckers; but, I don't really know how you can make a generalization about the whole subreddit, with any hope of accuracy. I've also met some really nice egalitarian ones, so to call misandry a part of their "true attitudes" is really far-fetched to me.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 09:33 PM
1

"how much should my lawyer charge, I make 40K" You're gonna have to shop around to find that out. Here in the US, a lot of lawyers work for firms that pass out assignments if you hire the firm. If this exists in Quebec, I'd recommend looking into it; because, talking to the firm about the details of your case is often free, and includes lots of consultation from the resident (insert type of legal issue) specialist. Going to lawyers without the middlemen has it's advantages too though; because, e…
/r/MensRights01/03/11 09:27 PM
2

Got ya then. Sorry for the confusion.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 09:17 PM
2

"I said that was how they masked it. Instead of looking like crazy feminists mostly unconcerned with the rights of their sons, husbands and fathers, they have randomly distract the eyeballs with a few touchy feely stories here and there." So you allege that they (intentionally?) are conspiring to distract outside observers from the fact that 2XC, a subreddit about women since conception, is not very concerned about men? Am I reading you right?
/r/MensRights01/03/11 09:14 PM
0

"2x just masks their insanity by talking about their feelings incessantly." Talking about how you feel makes you crazy?
/r/MensRights01/03/11 09:02 PM
1

"throw-away, i used pwgen to get my username :D" pwgen doesn't exist, apparently: http://www.reddit.com/user/pwgen/
/r/MensRights01/03/11 08:53 PM
3

Then just say, "Getting legal counsel is very important; because, they can best advise you. We aren't lawyers, and a lot of us aren't even from your country, so we don't know the laws you need to know to about." That's a hell of a lot better than calling him retarded and implying he is a troll after asking for help about a serious issue. That's a great welcome to our reddit for someone who may just be new to reddit in general. After all, this subreddit comes up as a top result on google, in tons…
/r/MensRights01/03/11 08:51 PM
4

"I am condescending because these questions have been asked and answered enough that one can almost assume this is some sort of trolling attempt." Way to be paranoid too... And so what if it's a trolling attempt? We can't afford to be dismissive to people when they need our help. What if we misjudge the situation, and they really were asking for help? And, no matter what, we're going to have to keep saying what we believe again, and again, and again, and again; because, most people don't think l…
/r/MensRights01/03/11 08:41 PM
2

"Shes not retarded. But you just might be." Really? Way to berate those in need...
/r/MensRights01/03/11 08:34 PM
1

"I can get behind that, I really can." Alrighty then, then let's get at it. Let's start a think-tank or a project, or something together. Let's tackle the big issues together.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 08:31 PM
1

Thanks for ringing him up, about the matter. :)
/r/MensRights01/03/11 08:28 PM
1

This is awesome. Thank you so very much for translating this. I hope this wasn't a bother.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 08:26 PM
0

Wanting to help men = h8t, apparently. Who knew? ~~
/r/MensRights01/03/11 08:23 PM
9

Thanks for the support. :)
/r/MensRights01/03/11 08:20 PM
1

"The karma/upvote system isn't accurate. It doesn't show actual upvotes or downvotes." Which is why it's good that the upvoteing wasn't on reddit, which means it's actually accurate.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 09:56 AM
4

My thanks in advance to anyone who can help with this.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 09:21 AM
1

Yeah, she was fuckin' insane too. At the the very least, both of them garner the top 2 spots hands down. Are you sure that Jiang Qing was just doing what her husband influenced her to do? I thought she was put in charge of the Cultural Revolution Committee and a lot of the things that happened then were her doing, and her ideas. I may be wrong, though. If I get the time, I may watch that documentary. Hopefully, because it sounds like a really important topic to know a lot about.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 09:10 AM
3

No, what I'm getting at, is that you don't follow the rules you hand out to others. You said, and I quote verbatim, "This focussing on micro-issues while ignoring major ones is getting pretty annoying." You yourself, go into micro, or completely unrelated issues, for that mater, all the time. I just simply would like to be afforded the same ease of subject matter that you grant yourself. If you wanna chalk up that inconsistency to Hunting for Archetypes being a personal blog, then that's fine. I…
/r/MensRights28/02/11 09:00 AM
1

Tons of them, obviously. I just found this interesting, that a subreddit with a community of +7000, had a link to an article, in which one comment had a large number of upvotes, despite every reply to that person disagreeing and berating him heavily for what he said. If the people on that blog really thought he was right, then why didn't they say so in the comment section? Instead they said, "your a fucking idiot", and "you are a flaming idiot who is trying to troll, shut the hell up and move on…
/r/MensRights28/02/11 12:24 AM
1

"This focussing on micro-issues while ignoring major ones is getting pretty annoying." Does everything that's said really have to be about the most hard-line issues? Why can't a mere reddit post be about something smaller? If everything has to be about the most important of issues, ALWAYS, then please explain how this post on your own blog is a major world-shattering gender issue for men: http://huntingforarchetypes.blogspot.com/2010/10/why-i-sometimes-hate-where-i-livea-lot.html Or what about t…
/r/MensRights28/02/11 12:15 AM
-1

God, some people in this world...
/r/MensRights27/02/11 11:09 PM
1

Admittedly, some of the entries there were new to me, and this was interesting to me too. For example I didn't know about Jiang Qing, and how she was the head of the Cultural Revolution in China. However, I think it would have been better to just link to the Wikipedia articles about them, and title the post something along the lines of "Men are not the only evil ones in this world". But, that's just me.
/r/MensRights27/02/11 11:08 PM
-1

"another 10 evil women" Really, Kloo2yoo? Is this article really necessary? Yes, it's true, contrary to common opinion, women can be murderous jackasses just like men; but, isn't there an infinitely more mature way of going about the whole 'men are teh worst' stigma? Doing it this way, sorta creates the potential for a reverse stigma.
/r/MensRights27/02/11 10:48 PM
1

Actually, in Nigeria, at least in areas that the government has full control of, it's illegal to gay as a male, but perfectly legal as a female. Though, in areas that ignore Nigerian federal laws, and follow religious court rulings, it's also illegal to a female gay. So I would definitely say that it's a men's rights issue, when the government there has made it illegal to do something as a male, but lets females do it to their hearts content. It's a matter of equal opportunity to to live your li…
/r/MensRights26/02/11 10:24 PM
1

"I don't think of innocent people being killed as anything but a human rights issue." So the holocaust wasn't a jewish rights issue? Nor was the extermination of the Indians an indian rights issue?
/r/MensRights26/02/11 10:07 PM
3

What about Dan Abrams book, “Man Down: Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt That Women Are Better Cops, Drivers, Gamblers, Spies, World Leaders, Beer Tasters, Hedge Fund Managers, and Just About Everything Else”. Is he just some crazy author, and it isn't a men's rights issue? (For those who don't know he's the chief legal analyst for NBC News and former General Manager of MSNBC). Personally, I feel that media has a real impact on culture and the way people look at things. The news, literature, music…
/r/MensRights26/02/11 10:03 PM
7

"Masturbation actually makes you hornier after the period in which you lose your sex drive." Really? It does that to you? I usually get kinda sleepy and I take a relaxing nap. ^ "Besides, I don't really like masturbating. It hurts and makes me feel pathetic." If this isn't something you don't wanna talk about, and if it is completely ignore this; but, why do you feel pathetic? There's nothing wrong about it, at least I don't think so. But, if it hurts you, then I can understand not linking it. A…
/r/MensRights21/02/11 02:17 AM
1

I love gays (yes homo) ^
/r/MensRights21/02/11 02:07 AM
5

Hey thetrollking. I have the answer, actually. According to Gallup polling women used to be more accepting; but, in the last few years there was an unprecedented shift in men's attitudes towards gays causing the acceptance of gays to skyrocket among men. Right now men are more accepting, and from what I've been reading this is a trend that is expected to continue and widen across men of every age and class. Right now men are 2% more accepting than women. From 2006 to 2010 women gained +2% accept…
/r/MensRights21/02/11 02:06 AM
11

If you masturbate a lot, you won't want sex; because, you've already satisfied yourself. That's one safe method that's healthy and reversible.
/r/MensRights21/02/11 01:56 AM
1

"Atheism is a mob mentality based on politics." As an atheist, I can tell you are wrong. We aren't a mob. We're not like, say, the christians, who have thousands of organizations where they all meet regularly on sundays and stuff. And we don't have uniform political beliefs. We just think that religious people are weird for believing in unicorns, and genies, angels, and demons, and a whole bunch of other crap that people would look down on D&D players for actually believing in, which is kinda ir…
/r/MensRights21/02/11 01:50 AM
1

I wouldn't have. It's sad when men kill themselves. :(
/r/MensRights21/02/11 01:35 AM
1

"By promoting 'men's rights' you are using the accomplishments of others to systematically degrade women. It's disgusting." Goodness me, I had no idea that me seeking legal reform so I won't be drafted, genitally mutilated, left without recourse if trying to escape domestic violence, stereotyped, and degraded myself were all conspiring to degrade women. I had no idea and I'm sorry; and, I'll stop pressing for me and other men and boys to be treated as equals to women and girls before the law. Th…
/r/MensRights21/02/11 01:34 AM
-2

Although not elaborated on by the poster, there is merit for this post. Most people know how societies around the world place a greater importance on work if you are male, to the point that in many societies, in many points in their histories, one's job, if male, was a prominent, if not primary, means of forming ones self identity. In some societies it got to the point that men were actually named after their fathers profession (and thus theirs, due to sons often having to take on the 'family' j…
/r/MensRights21/02/11 01:25 AM
2

It's cool, thanks for getting back to me as soon as you could. I've looked through part 6 of their report, though, and I couldn't find the clause or section you were talking about though. What page is it on? Where did I miss it? Sorry to bug you with all these requests and stuff. I hope it isn't a bother. Again, thanks a lot. ^
/r/MensRights20/02/11 11:42 PM
10

"Personally I don't have anything against women and even how men are portrayed in popular culture." When it somes to popular culture, we go to TVtropes.com. Have a look through here and tell me if you still think that way: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GenderAndSexualityTropes
/r/MensRights19/02/11 06:12 PM
4

"But I guess I understand wat u sayin, however if the woman kills a child and gets a pu$$y pass then it should be linked on r/mensrights" Well, in this story, everyone she knew came and supported her, after she strangled her son... I know if I killed my child, no one I know would come and support me; but, then again, I'm not female...
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:59 PM
-5

"We are victims," No we're not, you victimization circle jerker. STFU and GTFO. You're ruining this reddit... ~~
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:55 PM
1

"The recent Judicial Studies Bench book in England, says that women should be seen in a more favorable light." Do you have a link to that? Thanks in advance
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:53 PM
0

"Look dude. Men are shit, we already know that. It is a fact. We are dogs and if wome(n) would only treat us like the family dog we would probably be happy." Don't even joke around about that. >:(
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:49 PM
6

"So a woman strangled her son, she was insane. So what? What does that have to do with men's rights? I feel the poster's motive to post this came down to merely, 'a heinous crime was committed... and it was a WOMAN, not a man'." Or the motivation could have been something more along the lines of, 'A BOY was strangled to death, we are against bad things happening to boys and men, like murder, so this story is important' Personally, I think it's good that this reddit has links that show that men a…
/r/MensRights19/02/11 05:43 PM
1

I'm the one who needs to learn to focus, when you couldn't even read more than a paragraph of my article? Really?
/r/MensRights24/01/11 03:06 AM
1

I already voted, and I said no.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 08:07 PM
1

I see what you did there
/r/MensRights23/01/11 07:51 PM
0

MRA
/r/MensRights23/01/11 07:49 PM
1

what's/who's "fsm"? And what are you quoting from? The analysis by the International Monetary Fund?
/r/MensRights23/01/11 06:41 PM
2

Sorry about that then. My bad. I guess that's what tragedyfish must be thinking too, then.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 06:40 PM
1

MRA
/r/MensRights23/01/11 05:37 PM
2

Let's say for a moment that men buy more lollipops and taffy. I have no idea if this is true or not, but go with it. Would you allow shops to sell candy to girls for a lower price, just because they buy less at the stores? Let's say for a moment, that blacks buy more cars. Would it then be alright to charge whites, yellows, reds, and browns, less for the same cars, because of that? Apply the sane principle to any other scenarios that you can think of. Rinse. Repeat. You tell me, why any of this …
/r/MensRights23/01/11 05:37 PM
5

MADNESSS??? THIS IS SPAAARRRRRTTTTTAAAA!!!
/r/MensRights23/01/11 05:32 PM
1

Yeah,...I'll think of something to help clarify it all out. Or maybe I'll be lazy. lol :D
/r/MensRights23/01/11 04:23 PM
1

Hmmmm, I think you're right actually; but, changing it so its mathematically correct means changing it so its symbolically hard to read...I don't know what to do. xD xy=xx+5 is right, but it makes it look like i'm saying that it's women who will be required to pay more taxes, unless you actually take the time to sort out the equation, like you just did. Most people are just gonna skim through that part, so I'm at a loss. Maybe I'll just cut the math part out and figure out some other way to symb…
/r/MensRights23/01/11 04:22 PM
1

Also, the bit about xx>xy was a separate statement, not about the tax issue directly, but what the International Monetary Fund must think about women(xx) and men(xy) to propose such vitriolic sexism. xx>xy in that context is meant to read as "women are better than men", "Women are to get more than men", or "Women's concerns are more important than men's", etc. Take your pick, but it was just supposed to symbolize what the IMF appears to think.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 04:08 PM
1

Are you sure about that? I looked at the equation again, and it seems to checks out, to me. If xx is the taxes that women pay, then does not xx-5 mean that they will be paying less taxes, as proposed by the International Monetary Fund?
/r/MensRights23/01/11 04:02 PM
1

"I think women should pay more sales tax." Why would that be fair??
/r/MensRights23/01/11 04:00 PM
2

Is this just silly to you, out of curiosity? http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/141628446X/ref=dp_image_z_0?ie=UTF8&n=283155&s=books As long as you make out attempts to stop bigotry as 'overly PC' what do you allow? For those who are wondering "Chicks Rule" is a yearly calender that's actually sold in stores, no different from the "Boys are Stupid, throw rocks at them" shirts, before the early men's movement was able to get stores to boycott them. The calender from 2010 is this: http://www.…
/r/MensRights23/01/11 03:55 PM
5

Because a) they think that most second earners are women, anyway, and even though that's an obviously flawed way of going about things, since plenty of men who are second earners could be helped out too, its enough of a motive to move on to its 'logical' conclusion. b) they only want to help women anyway, which is also why they recommended only allowing women to file their taxes separately and only trying to raise female participation in the labor force. They're only concerned with women, sadly.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 03:43 PM
7

Do I know you? You act like you know my political leanings. Also, why are stereotyping all liberals?
/r/MensRights23/01/11 02:48 PM
1

Why on earth was this posted to this reddit? Besides it irrelevancy, why would you want to date anyone who can't read? I don't get it. That would just hinder the relationship, because she couldn't get a good job because she would be illiterate, and then you'd have to work a lot, lot, harder...
/r/MensRights23/01/11 02:34 PM
0

They let her get off with a plea deal... Damn, they dropped two counts so she would admit to the others. And she tracked down her boy after giving up for adoption? What a sicko. She doesn't care about her kid, and then stalks him later when he's older...ewwww...
/r/MensRights23/01/11 02:31 PM
-7

Why was this posted? How does this have anything to do with men's RIGHTS? This seems pretty irrelevant, and a cheap shot at stereotyping women... Somebody, please explain it...
/r/MensRights23/01/11 02:20 PM
0

Cool. ^ Give him our most sincere thanks. ^ Ask if our reddit can help in any way.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 01:39 PM
3

"That's just fucking wrong to make it against the law, I understand where they are coming from, but making a fucking religious thing against the law is just. As Penn and Teller would say. BULLSHIT!" There are plenty of religious things that are banned by secular law, such as slavery. It's not 'bullshit' to protect baby boys from having knives taken to them and protecting them from being flayed alive. It's RIGHT, not wrong. It's about time that Americans stand up to insanity and the backwards rel…
/r/MensRights23/01/11 01:37 PM
1

Europeans take knives to their baby boys too. Japanese and Chinese>Europeans and Americans...
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:03 PM
1

Ding, dong the witch is dead! Anyone who thinks that knives being taken to children and having them flayed alive is a 'non-issue' is obviously too stupid and heartless to be a useful addition to any discussion on any topic.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:02 PM
1

What if the International Monetary Fund had suggested that blacks pay more taxes than whites, or gays pay more than straights? Would as many people support this just to raise GDP as they do when they want males to pay taxes than females? It just goes to show: men<everyone else and their mother... At least when it comes to equality and people's respect...
/r/MensRights30/11/10 01:09 PM
3

My post scored a zero, a post exposing a bigoted book that seeks to 'prove' that men and boys, by sheer virtue of not being female, are inferior. This on MensRights reddit. My heart, it weeps. I'm that much closer to killing myself...sometimes, I don't why I bother. People will never care about us, they will never love us, and they will never stop hating us.
/r/MensRights24/10/10 06:36 AM
2

Why not spell 'feminism' as 'femynysm' so 'feminism' no longer supports patriarchal spelling conventions? xD
/r/MensRights24/10/10 03:08 AM
1

I think it's like fish, and 'womyn' is both singular and plural. Regardless of that, though, you should misspell their misspelling by sleeping the plural as "wömyn", for the lulz.
/r/MensRights24/10/10 03:07 AM
0

Oh Jesus, Alleh, Shiva, or whoever, where do I begin beyond what I've already written. Somebody just shoot me now. I really don't know how much more of this I can take. 'heavy sigh'
/r/MensRights24/10/10 03:03 AM
-1

More epic failure. You just told me. I didn't know before. Time goes like this: Past (did not have an account) ---> Present (recently told that making an account is easy) ---> Future (still no account, because I don't want one) --->
/r/MensRights08/10/10 10:45 PM
1

I stumbled upon this article and thought of you: http://www.alternet.org/teaparty/148346/why_are_there_so_many_right-wing_extremist_women/?page=1
/r/MensRights08/10/10 06:34 AM
1

The more you know!
/r/MensRights08/10/10 04:52 AM
3

A quick Google search has yielded this: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://holycrapthatsfunny.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/4chan.jpg&imgrefurl=http://holycrapthatsfunny.com/tag/hitler/&usg=__aCztcWblQtqWtUjXQThBgV_nZeQ=&h=466&w=610&sz=70&hl=en&start=0&zoom=1&tbnid=khgIQV4p5k4jPM:&tbnh=142&tbnw=186&prev=/images%3Fq%3D4chan%2Bhitler%26hl%3Den%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D582%26gbv%3D2%26tbs%3Disch:1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=133&vpy=80&dur=811&hovh=196&hovw=257&tx=153&ty=108&ei=bpyuTNTPFcuWnAfckvHBCw&o…
/r/MensRights08/10/10 04:23 AM
2

@Nikola_ist_nicht_ein_Illuminatti "it is only your hatred for Serbs and general lack of intelligence that prevented you from knowing that." it is only your hatred for Bosnian males and general lack of intelligence that prevented you from knowing that. (See what I did there? See? I can sound pompus, retarded, and asinine too!)
/r/MensRights08/10/10 04:04 AM
2

@heilNikola "But it does disprove your idiotic drivel about evil Serbs that who "as they gained territory they would systematically torture and murder Bosnian civilian males" and blah blah nonsense nonsense." Yeah, I'm talking with a holocaust denier. Wooot! Do you have a shaved head with a swastika on it? Uber-cool. That whole Srebrenica thing is just another Illuminati lie!!! Just like the whole Potočari thing!!! Damn bankers slandering the untarnished honor of teh Serbian Volk!!!
/r/MensRights08/10/10 03:58 AM
2

@nikolaSmasshhhh "and the ratio is cited already in the idc.org.ba link you submitted...Practically nothing of what you said is correct or even provable." Then why site the 25% statistic from a source you assert to be fallacious? Hmmmm, riddle me that. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBHYo0kH9Lo
/r/MensRights08/10/10 03:56 AM
2

@kawaiiiiiNikola "it is only your hatred for Serbs" You're so assumptions, it's adorable! I'm going to adopt you! So cute! I don't hate Serbs, I hate idiots and sexists. There's a difference. If you'd like to debate me on this point, you'd be awfully hypocritical for asserting all Serbs are these things.
/r/MensRights08/10/10 03:52 AM
0

@Nikola_S "My comment was sarcastic," That's what she said.
/r/MensRights08/10/10 03:49 AM
-1

Epic Fail. If I don't have an account, how would I know how long or intensive of a process it is to make one, nor does it speak for the fact that I may not want an account at Wikipedia to begin with.
/r/MensRights08/10/10 01:19 AM
2

No, no, no. You forgot. Employment only matters, when it's women's, or other apparently more important people's, jobs on the line. Just ask the ex-Secretary of Labor: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opxuUj6vFa4
/r/MensRights08/10/10 01:14 AM
-7

I don't know why anyone would accept any level of competency from that reddit.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 08:29 PM
0

I don't have a Wikipedia account. Sorry.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 08:24 PM
3

The source is "Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey" which was conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice and the National Institute of Justice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/172837.pdf Also, I got the number wrong. In one year, 3,246,180 on average will be subjected to some form of violence, with 3,153,432 being subjected to a physical assault of some type a year. T…
/r/MensRights07/10/10 08:23 PM
1

@classmaster "WE ARE MEN, GODDAMMIT." THIS IS SPARTAAAA!!!
/r/MensRights07/10/10 07:45 PM
2

"WE ARE MALES, GODDMAMMIT." Also, his assumption that the only people interested in men's rights are males is showing.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 07:44 PM
2

His silence seems to indicate that that would be a resounding yes.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 07:41 PM
1

You idiot. Kloo2yoo's comment was directed to you, meaning that he wants you to cite the Serb casualty ratio figure that you gave. Since you're too incompetent to cite anything you say, I'll do it for you. http://iwpr.net/report-news/bosnia%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Cbook-dead%E2%80%9D In addition, everything I said was cited. If you'd go and research these sources you'd see that. It's all in the Istraživačko Dokumentacioni Centar's and Adam Jones' research.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 06:56 PM
2

@Nikola_5 "There is not a single sentence in this crap that even starts to resemble something that eventually might look like truth. Starting from the fact that a quarter of victims of the war were Serbs and going from there on." Your own criticisms are best leveled at yourself. Explain to me how the fact that 1/4 of the war dead were Serbs disproves the research which points to an overwhelming majority of the total dead of the war being male. This is utterly devoid of logic. Please get a brain.…
/r/MensRights07/10/10 06:52 PM
1

hahahahahaha Shalom
/r/MensRights07/10/10 10:20 AM
2

Conservitives...antifeminists...do I really need to bring up Sarah Palin, the conservative feminist, who almost became our Vice president, and was a heart away from becoming president? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=185H2X1dNZI&feature=related Nothin', nothin', but you need to get a better grip on politics. If you don't want feminists in office, then don't vote Republican or Tea Party. If you want men's rights, then vote for parties that explicitly support men and boys; and, if you can't find an…
/r/MensRights07/10/10 10:19 AM
1

You serious, or are you just a troll? Please tell me you don't actually think that way.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 10:02 AM
3

@chessmaster "If men's rights is your top priority, vote conservative. If men's rights is not your top priority, GTFO. This is a men's rights forum." You're not getting the whole "supporting men's rights is not contradictory to various political philosophies thing" are you? I really hate partisan twits like you... all you ever care about is supporting your precious blue team or your precious red team. Never our team... Men's rights is my top priority, therefore I'm voting for something more alon…
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:56 AM
10

Abused males aren't "extremely rare". According to government figures there's almost a million cases of abuse against males a year in the US...
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:49 AM
1

And I thought Mankind was a pretty reputable and reasonable organization. :(
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:30 AM
1

Yeah, you should have called the police. What they did is just plain wrong. Breaking and entering, kidnapping, threats of violence (probably inebriated too) :( And you can bet that if that was done to them, they wouldn't hesitate to call the police... Also, don't say it was mostly your fault. You had no idea that that would happen :(
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:25 AM
1

Why did you post this sexist video to this reddit?
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:19 AM
0

Lol at the down-voting of my above comments.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:16 AM
1

@Rockytriton "give me a break, which one of you pussies has every been sexually assaulted by a woman. man up." One of my cousins, and 'ef you. >:(
/r/MensRights07/10/10 08:52 AM
1

@gnosticpopsicle "And yes, I think you are right that 'gangs are a black issue' would garner no support, but that's besides the point," No, the point is that people can get away with stereotypes against men and boys that they know better not to do other groups. It's bigoted and it's wrong.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 08:50 AM
1

@byaaa "it's misandrist" Actually, the correct word would be 'misandric'. 'Misandrist' is a noun, while 'misandric' is the adjective form of it.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 08:48 AM
0

@gnosticpopsicle "Rather, it is clearly meant to illustrate that it is not ONLY a women's issue, but concerns everyone." I'm sorry, but is English your second language?
/r/MensRights07/10/10 08:47 AM
1

O rly? Then why is it that society will force you to go war and use you as slave labor for the military in times of war? Why is it that domestic violence shelters don't exist for you; but, exist for women? Why is it that the government has numerous councils for Women and girls but ignores you and your needs? Why is that no affirmative action exists for you despite you belonging to an extremely under-performing group? Males are only 40% of degree earners and make less in most cities. When other g…
/r/MensRights07/10/10 08:30 AM
1

Also, I highly recommend that you guys read this: http://www.gendercide.org/case_bosnia.html Gendercide Watch is a very important organization that you should be familiar with. Their article on this conflict is very well done, and will add a lot to your understanding of these tragedies.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 08:23 AM
-1

The reason why this is significant can be best explained by the nature of the war. In March of 1992 war broke out between the three major powers in the former country of Yugoslavia- The Serbs, Croats, and the Bosnians. The Serbs were the most ruthless seeing the war as a holy crusade against the Muslim Bosnians. As they gained territory they would systematically torture and murder Bosnian civilian males, while letting Bosnian civilian females leave the region. The reason behind this behavior was…
/r/MensRights07/10/10 08:17 AM
2

If you want (or anyone else for that matter) to do a little investigating, there are a number of alternative left-leaning parties that don't have some of the sexist and racist snafus that the Democratic party has brought over the last couple of years, such as Obama saying that girls can do anything better than boys, Secretary of Labor Robert Reich saying that the stimulus shouldn't help men or whites, Supreme Court Judge Sotomayor saying that she hopes that latino girls always make better decisi…
/r/MensRights07/10/10 07:43 AM
3

@classmaster "So men's rights are a low priority for you." This isn't really a logical next step to jump to. The men's rights movement is extremely politically diverse. We draw conservatives and liberals, socialists and capitalists, atheists and theists, etc. All the people in it truly care about men and our rights; but, they all differ on other issues, based on personal politics and philosophies. Being an effective part of this movement means that you have to understand that consensus is only p…
/r/MensRights07/10/10 07:35 AM
1

@trollyfan "What fucking "liberal controlled media"? There is no liberal controlled media - it's all run by right-wing corporate conservatives. Often, extreme right-wing corporate conservatives." One thing I'll never get over about you liberals and conservatives is your psychotic paranoia and conspiracy theories over the media being controlled by your own respective them. Would you all just grow up for once? sigh...
/r/MensRights07/10/10 07:26 AM
2

@trollyfan "Only the stupid or evil vote Republican" Only the stupid or evil stereotype. :p
/r/MensRights07/10/10 07:23 AM
1

Do you say the same thing to other oppressed groups when they express themselves, or do we guys get special ire from you?
/r/MensRights28/09/10 08:19 AM
3

@thetraincaboose "you know we're already in charge, right?" No, I had no idea. I was too busy noticing that most of my male ancestors were killed after being enslaved by the government to fight in WWII. I believe the common terminology for their enslavement is "being drafted". I also a little busy noticing that after my 18th birthday I was told that I had to register for the "draft" or I wouldn't get suffrage and go to jail. If only I would pay more attention, I would notice that we guys have co…
/r/MensRights28/09/10 08:17 AM
3

@gtoeof "The point of the charity is not to discriminate against men, it is to help a specific subclass of people who need it especially: young girls in backward ass countries." You do realize that not all boys in poor countries live lives of luxury with golden cars and a 1000 camels, yes? The point is that the charity is only helping poor girls, and ignoring poor boys.
/r/MensRights28/09/10 07:54 AM
1

@gprime "But understand that this isn't problematic in the same way the uniquely female-oriented educational aid is in the US, where women are already outperforming men. This services a region of the world where women are treated as subhuman and legitimately suffer far more than their average male counterparts. This is about creating parity, not superiority." So giving poor boys the same educational opportunities in impoverished countries is wrong why? The boys from these areas in the world don'…
/r/MensRights28/09/10 07:51 AM
3

They also do that to boys there. In most of the countries with female circumcision, there's also male circumcision.
/r/MensRights28/09/10 07:46 AM
2

You can't be serious...
/r/MensRights09/09/10 08:38 PM
1

I'm a little pessimistic that the other faculty would be punitive on the teacher for issuing such instructions.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 03:59 PM
2

I could be wrong; but, I think he's saying that none exist... :(
/r/MensRights09/09/10 03:56 PM
1

Well, you can get in trouble for disobeying the teacher...
/r/MensRights09/09/10 08:51 AM
3

Just tell them, "The more I see the of you, the less I admire of you". Fuck sexism, and fuck sexists.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 08:11 AM
0

Well, this doesn't really belong here; but, since you asked, you'll just have to prioritize. Tell her that you're overworked and can't help her unless she's willing to help herself. She'll understand if you're patient and really flesh out your situation. This can be made to work, but it won't if you feel the burden of the relationship is falling squarely on your shoulders. Tell her you need a hand in helping her, that you want to see her get those scholarships, but can't get them for her. Do wha…
/r/MensRights09/09/10 08:05 AM
2

Perhaps that fact has normalized violence against males, which would make this all a vicious cycle.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 07:52 AM
2

It's always worth it to stand up for yourself. Always.
/r/MensRights07/09/10 10:09 PM
1

Obvious troll is obvious, or, sexist bigot is sexist. Take your pick.
/r/MensRights07/09/10 10:06 PM
3

Yes, it is completely worth is. No one would expect, say, blacks to abide by the assigned seats, if they were told to sit there just because they aren't white. Just because you aren't female doesn't mean the school has a right to trample over your freedom and dignity. When they ask you all why you are derelict, tell them Rosa Parks is an idol of yours. Tell them the truth: they're sexually profiling you guys and you want equal treatment.
/r/MensRights07/09/10 10:05 PM
2

I think the right term is sexual profiling.
/r/MensRights07/09/10 09:57 PM
1

Thank you very much for the support.
/r/MensRights07/09/10 09:47 PM
1

Please do. :D
/r/MensRights07/09/10 09:47 PM
1

I'm afraid I haven't had any volunteers yet. Well, I had one; but, her qualifications were more than a little questionable, to put it very politely. If the project actually starts, then I'll be sure to inform you upon it's completion.
/r/MensRights07/09/10 09:44 PM
3

If you're concerned over safety when going on other sites remember to use proxies. That's what there for. The manhood101 loons are probably too incompetent to gleam anything off of your IP address though. lol BOOKMARK THIS: http://proxy.org/
/r/MensRights07/09/10 09:35 PM
2

Thank you for the info. Very interesting.
/r/MensRights07/09/10 07:34 AM
3

Go Belgium radio!
/r/MensRights06/09/10 04:12 PM
2

They're dissolving their country???
/r/MensRights06/09/10 04:08 PM
1

Actually, boys have been a minority on campuses for far longer than 10 years. That trend started roughly 30 years ago.
/r/MensRights06/09/10 04:05 PM
2

You've got the right idea for what I'm aiming to do. =)
/r/MensRights06/09/10 04:03 PM
2

@girlp0wer We definitely need to start teaching our men to act like men again and quit 'bitching' about domestic violence. So girlp0wer, what power is it that you seek for girls? The power to abuse men and boys with impunity, perhaps?
/r/MensRights05/09/10 07:47 AM
4

@girlp0wer We definitely need to start teaching our men to act like men again and quit 'bitching' about domestic violence. In other words, keep brainwashing our men and boys to protect the identities of those who hurt them... People like you make me sick, it's because of lunatics like you that males don't feel comfortable talking about any of their problems. You would never tell a woman to stop 'bitching' about her husband abusing her, so aren't we guys worth the same considerations? Why aren't …
/r/MensRights05/09/10 07:36 AM
4

@girlp0wer A vulgar way to state it, but yes. This from the one who said "Grow a pair or keep your mouth shut."...
/r/MensRights05/09/10 07:32 AM
3

What's your email? That's how I intend to keep in touch with fellow researchers on the project, and that's how I intend to assign countries among the research group. EDIT: I came across this comment by girlp0wer: This is proof positive of the feminization of men. In the past, no man would have admitted to domestic violence against himself. I think feminism has done a lot of good things, but the emasculation of men is not one of them. We definitely need to start teaching our men to act like men a…
/r/MensRights05/09/10 06:52 AM
2

Perhaps not, actually. Even in a place like Iran there are many important men's issues. For example, take a look at their war with Iraq. The Basij were known for rounding boys up and using them to detonate mines by forcing them to run across mine fields. Also, in Iran, widowed husbands are only awarded half the amount of compensation money that widowed wives get; and in Islam men are mandated to take care of women, even when they can take care of themselves. And then there's the issue of stoning…
/r/MensRights04/09/10 04:29 PM
2

Where did you get that quote from? The last I had heard about Nofertil was that it was just about to go into world wide production: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHt0K7OMjNc I had also heard that the FDA didn't review it well, so it won't be coming to the US. I wish I could remember where I had heard that part though. The link I had saved no longer works for that part of the story.
/r/MensRights04/09/10 04:43 AM
1

@EddieVanHelsing True, but when misandry dies, If it dies, if it dies, ...
/r/MensRights04/09/10 04:32 AM
1

No. By refuting them we would delegitimize them. Don't let others lie about you. Just take a look at this link, and tell me we should permit this rumor mongering to continue: http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/not_all_patriarchal_control_freaks_are_men/
/r/MensRights02/09/10 09:57 PM
2

@geoffreyp mixed up she and he there...hyp·o·crite Indeed. Everyone makes mistakes. Even the best of us.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 09:48 PM
3

@Certhas I get annoyed at irrational prejudice ladden idiots who poison the neccessary discourse on how societies expectations and structures influence and disadvantage individuals with varying backgrounds. So do I. It's why I'm annoyed at you for calling women outearning men 'progress'; but, not calling men outearning women 'progress' Men doing well=bad! Women doing well=good!
/r/MensRights02/09/10 09:44 PM
4

@Certhas We know that women make 80 cents on every dollar men make, and that the average woman in her 20s makes 90 cents on the dollar. That quotation does not counter what I said. Please pay attention. Young women's earning power is indeed greater than young men's earning power, as I have said. I never said that young women's earning power was greater than all men's earning power.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 09:35 PM
0

@Certhas After you omitted the fact that it is actually a minority of women who earn more than their male counterparts rather than all in your title? A minority in almost every major city?... http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/09/01/cities-where-women-outearn-male-counterparts/?KEYWORDS=women In addition, I specified clearly in the title that this is about the younger generation. I haven't omitted a thing.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 09:32 PM
1

@Certhas But I"m done arguing with you, you have amply demonstrated that you care neither about logic nor facts when they don't align with you preconceived notions/anger Says the one who didn't care that he got the amount of cities wrong as well as the age group in which we are talking about. You've demonstrated no academic integrity, and all you care about is making excuses for things you'd never allow for other demographics.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:46 PM
3

@Certhas Say there was a schooltype where boys consistently outdid girls in literature. That would be what progress looks like, too. So yes, here we need an inequal development that benefits boys. Say that there was a plantation, where whites were consistently more enslaved. Would that be progress? Get it through your head. One tragedy does not justify other tragedies.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:42 PM
1

@Certhas "No right now among all young men they earn +5." No, right now they are earning 92% of what their female counterparts are making. Did you read the article? Young female's earning power>young male's earning power
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:39 PM
1

@Certhas The presentation of the article here is selectively presenting some facts, implying vast generalising statements and deeply misleading. Expound on this. What are it's generalizations? What facts is it selectively presenting?
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:36 PM
-3

@Certhas the first is nitpicking, my point stands. You hypocrite. You'd be furious if this story was being presented as though it was women from across all age groups making more than their male peers. So why are you giving yourself such leave to not report the age group that this effects correctly? If others can't get the ages wrong, why can you?
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:33 PM
3

@Certhas The reaction here is no better and just as ridiculous to me. This from the one who calls it 'progress' when women outearn men; but, not the other way around. What are you progressing towards do you think, when all that matters to you is seeing men do worse than women? Your instinctive reaction to this sickens me.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:30 PM
2

@Carthas You don't get the logic here, do you? If my goal is an average 0, and I'm on average at -5 then to find an outlier at +5 is indicative of progress whereas to be at -5 indicates stagnation and -10 indicates regression. In other words, if you favour equality in an inequal world you aim for an inequal development to counteract the inequal state and produce equality. So upon finding out that young men earn more than women, you'd call that 'progress' then, or does this rule of thumb only app…
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:23 PM
8

Never let anyone tell you the Indian government cares about it's men and boys, if they are charging kidnapped, abused, and likely raped males with criminal charges just for trying to escape their kidnappers, abusers, and rapists.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:14 PM
8

From the article These grooms are abducted, held captive and beaten up to submission and later forcibly married, often at gun-point with rope tied around their waist so that they don't run away. Subsequently if the groom tries to extricate himself from the marriage he is faces length legal battles, even criminal charges under Indian Dowry law, which is presently geared towards protecting the rights of women in the marriage, as in most cases girls family is financially strong and politically conn…
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:11 PM
5

@Certhas After all the reason this is a story in the first place is because it is the exception to what still is the rule. And we should welcome these exceptions as indicators of real progress This is going to be the rule for the rest of our lives. Women are 60% of college students, and have been the majority of college students for 30 years now. The only reason why women are less likely to earn more than their male peers in the 30 year old and older bracket is because they come from generations…
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:03 PM
5

@Certhas The headline is utterly misleading to start with. This number only applies in a few city areas for childless 20 something women. A) This is also a trend for 30 year old women. The trend was identified for 22-30 year olds. B) It wasn't for a few cities, it was almost every major one: http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/09/01/cities-where-women-outearn-male-counterparts/?KEYWORDS=women
/r/MensRights02/09/10 12:48 PM
4

@Gareth321 Let's hope feminists pick up the cause for men everywhere. Then they wouldn't be FEMinists.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 12:36 PM
3

Lol. XD Go blue team!
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:52 AM
2

@JLContessa Equal pay for equal work. Indeed.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:41 AM
-1

@JLContessa "If they have, they lack an important egalitarian attitude, and supporting such a movement is unjust." In the minds of most people, it's always just to support their movement, regardless of circumstances.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:38 AM
2

Nemo me impune lacessit! No one attacks me with impunity! Don't let others lie about you. If you allow this, people will believe the lies.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:34 AM
2

Why do you say that?
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:31 AM
2

@kanuk876 When society stops hating and abusing men, MRAs will disappear. Not necessarily. Organizations and philosophies tend to find ways to stick around after their expiration date.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:31 AM
8

@Feckless No surprise here. And as always the gap reverses when (mostly) women stay at home and care for the children. That men who do not stay at home earn more is really not discrimination. Now I am not saying there is no discrimination, but this is by far the main culprit. Even though feminists rarely seem to aknowledge this fact. Well, they seem really quick to acknowledge that discrimination is not the only possibility, when they are confronted with data that shows women making more. XD
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:26 AM
5

@onmyfaceplease Why doesn't the MR's reddit make a scholarship...or are you guys all talk? That's a brilliant idea. You should bring that up to this reddit's moderators. :) I'd chip, when I can. Ironically, I'm the one on a student budget who could actually use things like this. XD
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:23 AM
6

@onmyfaceplease So are you saying that private organizations don't have the right to offer whatever scholarships they want? I've never considered the issue, nor have said anything of the like here.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:21 AM
3

@onmyfaceplease There's plenty out there Then link 'em. :D
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:19 AM
5

The article I referenced draws on a professional study, "Gender Expectations and Stereotype Threat", which will be presented to the British Educational Research Association's conference tomorrow. Eventually a copy will be available online once it's reviewed by the Research Association. When that happens we can both examine it. Until then, Jessica Shepperd of the Guardian, is who we will have to rely on for proper reporting.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:18 AM
2

@zazou1 And those female specific scholarships above? I'm pretty sure a lot of them exist 'cause there are still people alive who remember when women couldn't vote. The 90 year olds? Those scholarships for young women exist for them?
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:10 AM
11

80% of suicides are male. :(
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:08 AM
4

After following their link, I arrived at this: http://aamn.org/scholarships.html They boost two, but one seems to have been canceled indefinitely, though. To be honest, I'm surprised there is even one. Also, can you find 50 scholarships for men? I'm very curious, as I'm a college student right now.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 06:05 AM
4

Really?! Could you please find a link to that for me? Thanks in advance.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 05:05 AM
2

Or we could just mirror the opposition for the lulz. The Matriarchy is behind the wage gap! haha ;) No, in all seriousness, what's mostly behind this is a lack of equal educational opportunities for boys. It's not a malicious conspiracy. It's just callousness towards the well being of males.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 05:04 AM
5

@onmyfaceplease At any rate - some citations to "hostile learning environment" please. I already linked to this, if you recall. Did you not read it? http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/sep/01/girls-boys-schools-gender-gap
/r/MensRights02/09/10 04:52 AM
15

@lanana I suppose you can't choose for your whole gender, but every individual man certainly has a choice whether to pursue higher education or not. Not always. Men don't have the same educational opportunities that women have. We don't have a slew of special scholarships for us, like women have, so many poor men don't get to go college unlike some pore women. Middle class and rich men and women do have the choice to go or not; but, not at the lower levels our society. We're only interested in h…
/r/MensRights02/09/10 04:49 AM
3

onmyfaceplaese Citations. Please. 50 Scholarships for Women: http://www.guidetoonlineschools.com/financial-aid/scholarships/women It's a small list of those out there; but, it will do.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 04:43 AM
4

@onmyfaceplease Ah, so boys need coddling to be able to learn? All kids need to be eased along in their studies. They won't get the basics without enough encouragement. Otherwise, they'll just give up on mastering concepts, because they'll feel it's boring and humiliating to make so many excuses. Now give them a pat on the head for a correct answer, and 'it's ok' when they make a mistake; and, you're in business. When it comes to boys, though, they have serious self esteem problems. http://www.g…
/r/MensRights02/09/10 04:30 AM
5

@onmyfaceplease you realize your arguments for why boys aren't earning as highly are the SAME ONES that feminists use to defend "The Wage Gap" ? Dude, this is the wage gap measurement. That's what the study was. The difference with this wage gap calculation is that they found men to be earning less, which is causing a lot of interesting reactions from a lot of people. From the feminists, they are almost embracing Warren Ferrel's personal choices theory on the subject. I think it's kinda funny, i…
/r/MensRights02/09/10 04:20 AM
1

Thanks! I had been wondering how everyone else was doing that. :D
/r/MensRights02/09/10 04:14 AM
1

@MrExample I often enjoy experimenting on the internet ORLY?
/r/MensRights02/09/10 04:14 AM
2

Do you have one in mind? What title wording do you think would be effective?
/r/MensRights02/09/10 04:10 AM
4

Actually, debates like these are kind of important. We shouldn't let bigots get away with hating and insulting us with impunity.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 04:09 AM
2

zaferk Sorry, can you teach how to quote things here? -
/r/MensRights02/09/10 04:03 AM
3

@svejkage "Controlling for variables would be comparing incomes of men and women with similar levels of education in the similar jobs in the same geographic area." Obviously, you don't know how the pay gap is measured. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wage_gap Fair or not, and I'm not sure myself, this is how statisticians have always measured this. The formula is basically x over y, where x is men's average income and y is women's average income.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 04:00 AM
7

@svejkage "I never claimed it was a small demographic." To quote you from earlier, "And this is only a measurement of a select demographic group where women out-earn men--young, single, childless, highly educated women in urban environments." As I've tried to point out to you, it's not just the childless, or the highly educated. It's a measurement of all the young women in the cities vs, all the young men there too. And, it's not as 'select' or as 'small' (to me the words here are interchangeabl…
/r/MensRights02/09/10 03:55 AM
5

@Svejkage "The trend of the average woman making more is only for urban environments." As reported in the Wall Street Journal, in almost every major city, yes.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 03:49 AM
7

@onmyfaceplease "So feminists = employers now?" Occasionally.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 03:47 AM
2

@bperki8 "Notice how you are now supporting the pay gap rather than saying it is men's choices." Where did I say that? All I said was that it's kinda funny that feminists are acknowledging that the pay gap is a more complicated issue than cut-and-dry discrimination, now that it's men who are being shown to underperform economically. I can't tell you if it's men's choices or not. Economics is not my forte; but, it may well account for some of it. I would like to know how men choose to get less de…
/r/MensRights02/09/10 03:46 AM
5

@asaturn "in which case, this probably isn't very fair -- a lot more HR people are female, for example... while a lot more janitors are male." There's certainly an argument that the wage gap was never a fair measurement of this subject. Just read Warren Ferral's "Why Men Earn More". However, do note that more women are waitresses and more men are CEOs. It goes both ways.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 03:41 AM
9

It's not always a choice. Boys are heavily disadvantaged educationally speaking. They don't have male teachers who can relate to them, and they live in a hostile learning environment. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/sep/01/girls-boys-schools-gender-gap In addition to that, schools and the government provide female-only scholarships for college and don't provide the same for boys, so many poor boys can't lift themselves out of poverty, like some of their female counterparts can. And, whe…
/r/MensRights02/09/10 03:37 AM
5

@svejkage "And this is only a measurement of a select demographic group where women out-earn men--young, single, childless, highly educated women in urban environments." Actually, it's not a small demographic. It's almost every major city. And, it's all of women's earnings in these areas to all of men's earnings in them. This includes all poor uneducated women, and all rich educated men too. The thing is that it's mostly women who earn degrees, and it's been that way since the 80's. The only sel…
/r/MensRights02/09/10 03:31 AM
7

@svejkage "Plus here I think you should probably be comparing medians instead of averages." It's not me comparing anything. This isn't my research. In addition, the pay gap has always been measured in averages. It's the modus operandi for these statisticians. I can't tell you why, though.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 03:24 AM
13

The pay gap is a measurement and comparison of the average total earnings of men and women in all combined fields, yes.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 02:42 AM
0

What is this link's relevance to men's rights?
/r/MensRights02/09/10 02:38 AM
27

Get your 92 Cents pins feminists. I'm waiting. Also, notice how the pay gap suddenly becomes a debatable issue with feminists now that research shows it's men being shafted. Sigh.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:49 AM
2

@kahnza "I never said they ALL say it." Then why did you say "If they can generalize, so can we"? Is that 'they' not women, then?
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:35 AM
3

My grandma trolls better than you...
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:31 AM
2

@kahnza "Yeah, and a lot of women say all men are pigs. If they can generalize, so can we." They don't all say those things. There you go again, recklessly and unfairly stereotyping them all. It's not 'they' saying those things, it's some of them saying those things. Why are you generalizing the one's who haven't generalized us? Do they now get leave to stereotype men, based of what you said, since we're playing an eye for an eye, apparently?
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:27 AM
6

South Vietnam lost the war? :p
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:17 AM
2

Debatewise is actually pretty fun. I'd recommend it to people who like to talk about things intellectually. There are a lot of cool subjects for discussion, though. Yeah, these bigots are there too; but, you'd be arguing with such sexists here anyway.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:15 AM
7

Don't you think you're crudely stereotyping them? Sure a few might be like that; but, so are a few men. It's pretty unfair to attribute these behaviors to all of them, when most of them probably are the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:13 AM
2

You'll need to make an account with debatewise.com to debate them though.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 12:56 AM
3

I came, I saw, I commented.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 12:51 AM
4

Indeed. Culture does not make right.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 12:35 AM
5

Oh like she doesn't have smegma too... Does that mean she should have a knife taken to her? No.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 12:33 AM
3

Good on the father for sticking up for his boy. :)
/r/MensRights01/09/10 10:48 PM
7

Sadly a lot of boys don't build up self esteems. In school they're rarely complimented for things they get right, and they're always chided for things they get wrong. School environment are not very welcoming to boys. There was a article posted to this reddit about that. In case you didn't see it, here it is: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/sep/01/girls-boys-schools-gender-gap
/r/MensRights01/09/10 10:46 PM
14

If you talk to African men, they'd likely say they prefer cut women. After all, no 'icky cunt cheese', to borrow on your wording. This is cultural, the same mindset that causes women from regions with a high rate of male genital mutilation to think of it as desirable and preferable. They don't know better until they're told. After that, all one can hope is that they will spare their own kids. What's important is telling people that smegma is not bad. It's normal and it's not even dirty, It's mos…
/r/MensRights01/09/10 10:14 PM
2

I'm not more concerned with newborns' inability to say no. The doctors wouldn't listen anyway. If they can flay a baby apart while it's screaming, then a poultry "No, please don't mister" wouldn't suffice anyway. :( I'm just as concerned both ways; because, it's all an ignoral of the boy's wishes. If they really cared about us, then they'd let us choose how we want ourselves to look. To me it's as heinous either way. Anyway, that's just how I feel.
/r/MensRights01/09/10 10:03 PM
1

I am adding something, you just don't seem to get it... :( What I'm trying to tell you is that girls are not women, and women aren't girls. When both had their childhoods, they had different childhoods, partly because of the differences of the times. Girls don't have the same pressures that women have. And this generation of girls has a different set of pressures than the previous generation. Again, this picture is outmoded in it's relevancy. Comprende, or do I need to explain it another way?
/r/MensRights01/09/10 09:55 PM
2

For me the answer is encouraging ambivalence to peer pressure among children. That's roots out the feeling of having to be a certain way because of your gender.
/r/MensRights01/09/10 09:50 PM
5

The male pill exists already. It's called Nofertil. It uses the chemical gossypol as a spermicide. It was created in Brazil, but it was banned in the US though. :( I don't know about other countries.
/r/MensRights01/09/10 09:45 PM
2

If I were a judge I'd count that as gross negligence, personally.
/r/MensRights01/09/10 09:37 PM
0

@hlkolaya "asserting that something has an actual definition isn't stereotyping." Feminism (feh'-mih-niz-'em) noun. the philosophy for female supremacy over males; 2. the application of said theory thereof See? I'll I did was 'assert' an definition based off of only one group of feminists- the like of Jilly Cooper, Mary Daly, Sally Gearhart, Elizabeth Stanton, Germain Greer, Andrea Dworkin, and Robin Morgan to name a feq. Perhaps you can now appreciate the world is not as simple and organized as…
/r/MensRights01/09/10 09:33 PM
0

@strangersadvice "Finally, one can use the 14th Amendment [Equal Protection] in conjunction with the anti-Female Genital Mutilation laws." One can use this approach; but, it won't be effective. Remember in most people's mind "male genital mutilation is different". They won't likely apply the law equally between the two genders.
/r/MensRights01/09/10 09:08 PM
2

All males deserve to have the right to have their body the way they want it. Not just newborns.
/r/MensRights01/09/10 09:06 PM
8

You can't mean what I think you do. Surely you appreciate and agree that the right of every male to not be flayed alive should be pursued.
/r/MensRights01/09/10 09:03 PM
1

Children don't have the same pressures exerted on them that adults do. I can't say it simpler than that.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 08:34 PM
0

When a woman is called a dick she experiences the same frustrations. People don't like to be insulted, and the psychological effect is the same. They get annoyed. You're blind reactionarism is hilarious to me. You're essentially stomping your feet and shouting, "fine, I'll go where I'm appreciated!" If you're so foolish as to believe that everyone over there will agree with your every point, then I won't stop you; but, I find you contemptible. You'll stereotype all 10,000 readers on this reddit,…
/r/MensRights31/08/10 08:13 PM
2

You're asserting that all feminists fall under one solitary definition, and thereby stereotyping them all.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 08:10 PM
8

"Positive" discrimination supporters reveal their revolting bigotry, by their support for any kind of discrimination. It's sickens me that they think that discrimination can ever be positive. They should be wearing their white hoods, so we can easily identify them.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 08:02 PM
0

Let me ask you a question. How old are you? What do you know of the modern adolescent?
/r/MensRights31/08/10 04:39 AM
0

@mandano "i thought people used the terms "girl and woman" interchangeably these days." To the great annoyance of many women, yes, many do that. It's kind of ironic that you using the terms interchangeably, when the actual poem by Nancy Smith, before it was horribly bastardized and stolen by the Syracuse Cultural Workers collective, purposefully used the word 'woman' and not 'girl' because of her strong distaste for the word, as lined out in the poem "Call me a Woman" http://www.workplacespiritu…
/r/MensRights31/08/10 04:35 AM
1

@mandano "Why are you going all semantics on me?" Because girl≠woman. I'm not talking about 45 year olds. I'm talking about girls, like the picture is.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 04:23 AM
1

@hlkolya "of course only women have them- which makes it a gender based slur. which was my original point so thank you." And yet men are called cunts too. And yet women are called dicks too. What is your point? Seriously, you're like the best troll I've seen outside of YouTube and 4chan. I didn't even make a comment about women having cunts, and yet I almost proceeded as though I did because of your fake qoute. Bravo, sir. Upvoted
/r/MensRights31/08/10 04:19 AM
0

@hlkolaya "well, not being a feminist likely means you're not for the equal rights of women though i wouldn't say a non feminist hated women." Lol. Let me ask you something. Are you a member of the NAACP? Are you a member of the MRM? Are you a member of the ILGA? Are you a member of the MALDEF? Etc. What groups are you likely to want to treat as inferior, since you're not a member of their official organization; because, as we all know, it's completely logical to assume someone is a bigot just b…
/r/MensRights31/08/10 04:13 AM
0

@hlkolaya "if you're for women being equal- then you are, by definition, a feminist." No, I am by definition a sane person. I'm not a feminist: I don't believe in conspiracy theories.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 04:04 AM
-1

Not in my generation. ~~ Also why did you switch the topic from girls to women?
/r/MensRights31/08/10 02:15 AM
0

@hlkolaya "don't cover up your own misogyny by hiding it under mens rights." Not being a feminist means you hate all women? Wow. I had no idea so many men and women in this world hated women, then. You learn something everyday. And here I thought I loved women, because I want to see them treated as equals with men, and to see them happy and successful. I guess not though, since I don't choose to identify with a philosophy that believes in conspiracy theories, like zeh Patriarchy, comparable to t…
/r/MensRights31/08/10 01:59 AM
0

@hlkolaya "well feminism is about equal rights" x=x This mentality is only suited to mathematics where diversity of opinion doesn't exist. In the real world: Red Stockings=feminists Mary Daly=feminist If you're going to interact with humans successfully, learn that we form groups, and almost no one in those groups have much in common. Also in real world: iFeminists=feminists Cristina Sommers=feminist Savvy? Some feminists are bigots. Some are egalitarians. Don't be so one-sided as to completely …
/r/MensRights31/08/10 01:50 AM
1

It's not easy for people to recognize and deal with hatred against men. It's obvious to us that something needs to be done, but the WordPress staff will not be easily motivated to take action. There's a strange emotional disconnect between the words "sexism" and "males". Most people aren't motivated to help males, because "aren't males always able to take care of themselves anyway", or some such mentality.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 01:40 AM
0

@hlkolaya "And hey- fucking an asshole isn't quite the same as being an asshole." And hey- fucking a cunt isn't quite the same as being a cunt.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 01:18 AM
2

Take heart in that exposure to these bigots allows you to understand the opposition to male equality better. If you understand their mindset, you can rehabilitate them and others to be unmisandric.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 04:48 PM
1

I looked through the Google searches; but, I couldn't find what you are talking about. I could only find one article about th tea parties, and it was very sympathetic to liberals being out-muscled by those fanatics. http://mensnewsdaily.com/2010/04/16/for-men-at-the-tea-parties-how-many-lumps-on-the-head/ Where are the articles that are "dripping in disdain for any given minority group." Name 'em, or GTFO.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 04:39 PM
6

Their blog has been active for 4 years. I think they've been at this so long, that there's no other explanation other than that they are serious.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 04:29 PM
0

@hlkolaya "I'm so glad there are other feminists out there- real feminists- defending men's rights as well as women's rights." Real feminists? Who's a true Scotsman then?
/r/MensRights30/08/10 04:27 PM
7

But the genders aren't reversed and WordPress won't likely do anything. People don't care about us guys. :(
/r/MensRights30/08/10 04:26 PM
4

Indeed. If you don't shed light on bigotry you let the bigots go unnoticed. This allows them to spread their hate without having a counter voice to oppose them.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 04:25 PM
0

@hlkolaya "asshole isn't a gender based term-" Asshole is a heterosexist term that singles out gay men who prefer anal sex with each other over coitus with females.~~ "Consider using vocabulary that expresses your anger without fueling the fires of people like this." The only fire it's fueling is yours, it seems.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 04:22 PM
9

@thrllhs "This is for real? I thought it was just an incredible troll" Odds are that they are serious. Most people don't spend 4 years making a website for a joke. Trolls aren't that madly devoted, usually.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 04:17 PM
-1

No proof has been provided for these ludicrous and slanderous claims yet. Are you illiterate? No article has been referenced that "is dripping in disdain for any given minority group." Not a one, let alone lots of them as SouthernGuy22 is suggesting. Intellectual integrity is not either of your strong suits, I can see. So far no proof what-so-ever.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 04:04 PM
2

As long as baby boys are held down and flayed alive, we have a men's issue of great seriousness to deal with.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 08:47 AM
2

lol. I called it. ha
/r/MensRights30/08/10 08:25 AM
9

Can someone explain to me how this belongs here? It's a relic of a mindset(for lack of a better term). This isn't how things are for my generation. Girls aren't called anything but "cool" for doing competitions. Girls aren't chided for knowing stuff. Girls don't act weak. Who the hell has a EZ bake oven? The girls are playing video games and watching television like the boys. Since when have there been television adverts that attack girls' self esteems? Only a 80 year old could have made that pi…
/r/MensRights30/08/10 07:24 AM
1

Could you lay out a list of all your references?
/r/MensRights30/08/10 07:00 AM
-3

@SouthernGuy22 "And then when i point it out you call me a liar." Proof or GTFO.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 06:56 AM
-2

@SouthernGuy22 "So you admit that the site was partisan to the hard right" Did avoiceformen stutter? He clearly said "Even as MND editor over the past year I was often frustrated by too much content that I thought was overly partisan to the right."
/r/MensRights30/08/10 06:54 AM
-1

@SouthernGuy22 "Every article with even a hint of opinion either had something condescending to say about brown people, gays, intellectuals or liberals." Would you be so kind as to go through all of their opinion articles and demonstrate this to me?
/r/MensRights30/08/10 06:42 AM
0

Last call on relevant discussions about MND. Was it too partisan? Was it too focused on separate issues like climate change and the drug war? Whatever you decide, here's to MND, for all the good times and great articles! This is an end to an era. This decade we MRAs have a lot of soul searching to do, about who we are and what we are to stand for. It's a shame that MND won't be with us for that.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 01:52 AM
0

MND 2001-2010 RIP
/r/MensRights30/08/10 12:42 AM
2

Erections are involuntary. It's a process handeled by the unconscious mind, and it's why a lot of guys wake up hard. You can force a sexual response on a guy, which is what happens to a lot of raped guys.
/r/MensRights29/08/10 06:36 AM
1

Way to stereotype your own brothers.
/r/MensRights26/08/10 08:47 AM
2

Surely you can see the relevance to the subject of men's rights of stories that display society's ignoral and even belittling of domestic violence against men.
/r/MensRights26/08/10 08:45 AM
4

Even though it paints women as superhuman incarnations of virtue by using language like "Who would have imagined that women, probably mothers at that, could conspire to commit such diabolic and barbaric acts?", it's still a very pertinent story. I wish the author would treat women like humans, capable of of the same good and bad as the rest of us, though.
/r/MensRights26/08/10 08:19 AM
2

How does feedburner work? I tried using it before; but, I kept running into difficulties. I'd really appreciate it, if someone could give me some technical advise.
/r/MensRights15/08/10 06:40 AM
1

@mandano "Although I must admit, it does get a little annoying when a bunch of the posts on MR are like WOMAN STABS MAN AND CUTS HIS BALLS OFF: LOOK HOW EVIL WOMEN ARE." The posts that deal with women hurting men aren't to demonize all women, I don't think. Definitely a few of the commentators here take these stories and run with them painting women with a wide brush; but, the intent of the posts is usually to show that when men get hurt there is a double standard, or that these stories are the …
/r/MensRights14/08/10 05:04 PM
1

The Gutenberg Press is what I love. Without it, most people would still be illiterate and books would be very rare.
/r/MensRights13/08/10 05:16 PM
2

Good article. One quote I always liked was from Albert Einstein, who said, “In matters of truth and justice, there is no difference between large and small problems, for issues concerning the treatment of people are all the same." I think a lot of people should take this to heart and stop being so apprehensive about us specializing in gender issues from the male perspective. Men's issues are just as legitimate as anyone else's issues, and we shouldn't feel bad about addressing topics that almost…
/r/MensRights13/08/10 05:10 PM
4

@scooooot "What laws legislatively favor women over men?" 1)The Selective Act, which forces men to register for the draft, or they will be fined and imprisoned. 2)The Violence Against Women Act, which only protects women from domestic violence and leaves men with no where to turn if they are stuck in an abusive relationship. 3)The Federal Prohibition Against Female Genital Mutilation Act, which only protects women from circumcision, and leaves baby boys vulnerable to being flayed alive. And hell…
/r/MensRights13/08/10 03:11 PM
1

The one thing we can do to fight this is be on alert for boys, who are being mishandled and abused by their families. Be sure to report incidents you notice to Child Services.
/r/MensRights13/08/10 02:12 PM
2

Thanks. I pride myself on being able to dig these kinds of things up. =)
/r/MensRights13/08/10 12:57 PM
1

Yes, patriarchy theory is consistently held by almost all feminist factions, and there is a rough feminist mainstream based on what they can mostly agree open. That being said, feminism is increasingly less homogeneous, and as a result it's impossible to pin down what feminism is with great certainty. It's in a state of sheer chaos right now. For example, right now there is a growing point of contention between those who support patriarchy theory and those who are endorsing the new kyriarchy the…
/r/MensRights13/08/10 12:44 PM
1

@inabook "The Men's Rights movement has a lot of radicals too--" Define 'radical'. Orthodoxy is a very subjective thing.
/r/MensRights13/08/10 12:33 PM
1

@inabook "Feminism means as much as Men's Rights. Both movements have subsets-- the Men's Rights movement is newer, but even in it, you see subsets--" Actually, I'm pretty sure that 'Men's Rights' is a subset, itself, of the larger men's movement. I personally identify as a men's rights activist; but, in my experience we MRAs are a part of a larger men's movement that also includes various philosophies and factions, some of which don't address issues of law and rights. A while back, I tried to c…
/r/MensRights13/08/10 12:31 PM
1

I'm glad to hear that things are good for you now. I appreciate your offer very much. If you'd like, I could formally interview you, so others can see your story and feel less alone about coming out and discussing calamities that have befallen them. Your identity would be entirely protected, as you have expressed the need for anonymity.
/r/MensRights13/08/10 11:49 AM
1

Thank you very much. =)
/r/MensRights13/08/10 10:21 AM
1

Sorry to hear all that happened to you. You have my condolences.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 09:38 PM
1

If you mean the video "Cenk Uygur Is a Sexist Bigot", then yes, that was me.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 09:37 PM
2

Good catch. I fixed it now.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 09:21 PM
1

You'll find that many people think they are the same word. It's just how the language has developed recently. You're being kinda aggressive for a simple spelling mistake.
/r/MensRights07/08/10 12:59 PM
1

Yeah, in some dialects, 'then' and 'than' is actually pronounced the same. Even in dialects where they're not, they are still often considered to be homonyms.
/r/MensRights07/08/10 10:09 AM
6

@epistemology "No mention of the study or its methodology." Here it is, I believe: '(How) can social policy and fiscal policy recognise unpaid family work?' by Catherine Hakim. http://www2.lse.ac.uk/newsAndMedia/news/archives/2010/08/domestic_duties.aspx
/r/MensRights07/08/10 10:06 AM
1

@internethardman "So men should do the same amount of housework as women even if they work longer hours." Apparently, it is men who have a "double shift", as the feminists put it.
/r/MensRights07/08/10 10:04 AM
5

@Ozwaldo "Men don't need defending. We're men." It is precisely because we are men, that we do need defending. We are portrayed as bumbling morons in the media, i.e. Peter Griffin and Homer Simpson. We are more likely to die of every major cause of death, yet no Office on Men's Health exists, even though a Office on Women's Health does exist. In wartime we are conscripted and forced at gunpoint to fight and die. The largest mass grave in the US is Arlington, filled to the brim with the bodies of…
/r/MensRights07/08/10 10:02 AM
1

Poor guy. I feel really sorry for him. =(
/r/MensRights07/08/10 07:47 AM
2

The word 'feminism' doesn't really mean anything anymore; because, their movement splintered into many disparate factions a long time ago. What you call 'radical feminism' is a major faction though, with many of their leaders and major authors identifying with it. Probably, what's called 'liberal feminism' is the largest faction right now, if I understand their politics correctly. You're right that the two things are not the same; but, don't underestimate the influence of 'radical feminism' on t…
/r/MensRights06/08/10 11:56 PM
6

I don't think people downvoted you for what you said. I think they downvoted you for what you did- downvoting what he said, which a lot of people agreed with. Whatever he identifies with, it's nice to see guys expressing themselves, and a lot of us appreciate that more than any label he wants to take. That being said, it would be nice to see more people championing our cause.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 11:49 PM
2

I think this is the one: "(How) can social policy and fiscal policy recognise unpaid family work?" by Catherine Hakim. http://www2.lse.ac.uk/newsAndMedia/news/archives/2010/08/domestic_duties.aspx
/r/MensRights06/08/10 11:17 PM
2

I liked what both of you said. XD
/r/MensRights06/08/10 11:16 PM
2

I think it might be "(How) can social policy and fiscal policy recognise unpaid family work?" by Catherine Hakim. http://www2.lse.ac.uk/newsAndMedia/news/archives/2010/08/domestic_duties.aspx
/r/MensRights06/08/10 11:14 PM
5

@buckmyfutt "hahahaha okay this is getting funny now" Why is it that people laugh at men who don't have a big sex drive? Why is it not OK for men to just want to focus on other things? It's like it's shameful or something. Whenever I mention I'm not interested in dating, people laugh at me and think I'm gay, like that's something bad too. =(
/r/MensRights06/08/10 07:51 AM
3

@buckmyfutt "try to enjoy unbelievable leg up you have in the society governed by men in 83% of congress and 100% of the presidency." I know right, because those 150 guys care so much about us 150 million guys. I mean, we're practically in cahoots. It's why abused men are turned away from domestic violence shelters because we're not female. It's why only men have to sign up for the draft, and if we don't we are fined 100s of thousands of dollars and are sent to jail and don't get suffrage. It's …
/r/MensRights06/08/10 07:46 AM
1

@buckmyfutt "and meet the girl you chose for your date," I'm not interested in dating.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 07:36 AM
6

@buckmyfutt "from your job where you probably make more than your female coworkers," If I did, it wouldn't be because I'm male. http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf
/r/MensRights06/08/10 07:35 AM
4

@buckmyfutt " Tell you what, next time you walk the streets openly wearing whatever the hell you want," Yeah, like guys can really wear whatever we want with impunity right? http://www.nytimes.com/1998/04/03/nyregion/a-school-is-split-over-boys-in-skirts.html?scp=1&sq=%22A%20School%20is%20Split%20Over%20Boys%20in%20Skirts%22%20by%20Jonathan%20Rabinovitz.&st=cse
/r/MensRights06/08/10 07:34 AM
2

Great find there. This was a very interesting and important link.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 06:59 AM
4

@buckmyfutt "you crusade for men's rights from a country where men routinely get higher pay, more job opportunities and more governing positions." Firstly, not all of us are from the same country here, so please specify which one you think we are in. Let's say we're in the UK, we most certainly wouldn't have the same job opportunities that women have, even in the British government: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1297421/Work-experience-FO-Not-middle-class-white-male.html Let's say we w…
/r/MensRights06/08/10 06:42 AM
2

How likely would it be for people to support this or any other war, if men weren't the majority of the casualties? I wonder sometimes...
/r/MensRights06/08/10 06:21 AM
12

@buckmyfutt "I'm having a lot of trouble understanding what it is you find detestable about a woman urging the end of systematic oppression and unbelievable violence against females in the region. Do you really not think that is one of the biggest issues facing the middle east right now?" I have a question for you. How would you feel about the idea of a coalition of countries invading the US to liberate men from the violence we face? How would you feel about them installing a puppet government t…
/r/MensRights06/08/10 06:19 AM
1

I don't remember that much of the Muppets; but, Miss Piggy would stalk and hit Kermit right? If so, then yes, she is a terribly abusive character.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 02:19 AM
5

"Killing the Cause- Part 1 Jay Hammers" by Paul Elam http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y89d_z577C4
/r/MensRights06/08/10 02:09 AM
-2

The new motto of our times: "Women and Pashtuns first!"
/r/MensRights06/08/10 01:27 AM
5

That's about it, from where I'm standing too. There's also some ethical and historical things he brings up with that link about WWI boys being shamed and humiliated for not joining the war.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 01:23 AM
2

OK, men die sooner, because the government spends less on our health and sends us to die in wars. Let's apply that factor. That means for men to get the same amount of pension money on average, they'd have to start giving it to men earlier than women. What point am I missing? Do you really want a group of people to be discriminated against, by making them wait longer for things? It's not fair to do that to men and it's not fair to do that to anybody. If you really want to factor in those things …
/r/MensRights06/08/10 01:17 AM
-1

That's the old Labour Government's plan. That site hasn't updated their information, yet. The new plan is by Duncan Smith and Webb, which will make men's retirement age be 66 by ~2015, and make women's retirement age be 66 by ~2019. Look: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/7927391/Pension-age-of-66-within-five-years.html
/r/MensRights06/08/10 01:11 AM
9

And the irony of telling a man to stop being concerned with how women's lives are being more valued than men's lives, in a subreddit devoted to men's issues, goes right over his head.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 12:59 AM
1

Actually, many young boys were forced to wear to such devices back then, so they wouldn't masturbate; because, society back then disapproved of sexuality, particularly male sexuality. The chastity belts were from the same era that circumcision started in the US, after all. In certain backwards areas of the US, some boys are probably still forced to wear these things...
/r/MensRights06/08/10 12:37 AM
2

Ah, then obviously that would be exploiting the articles commercial value, which the Digital Copyright Millennium Act doesn't protect.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 06:15 PM
3

@reducio "Making it equal for both ages is not a 'damn good thing'." What is the retirement age was 60 for men and 65 for women? Would you still support the age difference then? What if is was 60 for whites and 65 for blacks? Would you still support the age difference then? What if is was 60 for straights and 65 for gays? Would you still support the age difference then? What if is was 60 for Christians and 65 for atheists? Would you still support the age difference then?
/r/MensRights05/08/10 04:48 PM
1

Was he collecting money from ads? Am I missing something?
/r/MensRights05/08/10 04:43 PM
1

Nothing specific, actually. It's just something that I'd like to refer to when I talk about the education gap between men and women. I might use it in a future video or article, I don't know. I guess, mostly I just feel compelled to read it for myself. It's so damned crazy, I can't resist.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 04:14 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights05/08/10 04:09 PM
1

So elderly people should wait longer for their pensions, even though they've been paying into the system for more than 40 years? Don't you think they've earned those benefits after that. It does work out mathematically that they get their pension after that, but the government just wants to use them to help pay off it's debts. It's not fair them, if you ask me. At 60 they've earned a pension. (Just a note to those who are confused by what seems to be a contradiction. As I said before, I want the…
/r/MensRights05/08/10 03:25 PM
6

No, this is why no one should take anyone to that appointment.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 03:12 PM
1

@Joeboy "Why 60 rather than say, 23?" Because ~5 years of paying into the system isn't obviously enough to merit a pension. I would think that this would be obvious.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 02:59 PM
1

@Joeboy "I don't see why you're still trying to justify your position using part of an article that clearly doesn't represent it accurately." I'm not so sure it doesn't represent it accurately. As I've said before, it could go either way. It's impossible to tell.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 02:52 PM
1

@Joeboy "Nor would it be fair if people approaching retirement were confronted with an immediate unforeseen six years of extra work." In my opinion, I don't know why the retirement age is being raised. It seems like a better idea to lower men's retirement age to 60, so it's even with women's; but, I'm not in charge of the UK. They seem to want to raise them. I just want them to equal them.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 02:51 PM
1

@Il128 "I know the right's stance on gay marriage is about as anti-men's rights as you can get." Gay marriage isn't a men's rights issue. It's a gay rights issue. Are only male homosexuals being denied the right to marry?
/r/MensRights05/08/10 02:14 PM
2

Congratulations, in many countries you've committed a crime. For example, in Norway you would have violated the Animal Welfare Act.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 02:10 PM
1

@Joeboy "Where? I can't see anything about when the ages would start increasing, only about when they would reach 66." To quote the article again, "While the government didn't suggest a specific date for the increase in the retirement age, press reports said it could come as soon as 2016 for men, or ten years earlier than the last government planned. For women, the pension age would be lifted a few years later, the Telegraph newspaper reported." The article says that women's retirement ages woul…
/r/MensRights05/08/10 02:00 PM
0

Joeboy "Do we agree that that article doesn't say that women's pension ages will start increasing later than mens'? If so I'm happy to overlook the fact it was published over a month later than the one that apparently references it." Actually, the article does say that. As to whether that's a mistake because of sloppy wording, that remains to be seen. It could go either way. And what does the age of the article have to do with anything? I don't always get to writing my articles and making my vid…
/r/MensRights05/08/10 01:36 PM
3

I'm presuming that Reddit and articlesaboutmen falls under the jurisdiction of US law, correct? If so, then under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, he can copy their whole articles as long as it's being done for educational purposes, which it appears they are, since he is using them to educate people on men's issues. As long as he's not exploiting any commercial value of these articles, then he is acting within his rights. (I'm not a lawyer, so don't quote me, I could very well be wrong)
/r/MensRights05/08/10 01:30 PM
1

Thank you very much for your time, regardless of whether you can find it or not. I appreciate it. =)
/r/MensRights05/08/10 01:18 PM
0

But they could just as easily draft a new budget now. It's a new administration anyway. Why do men have to carry the burden of this tediously slow transition? We might as well be talking about making women sign up for the draft in stages instead of doing it wholesale immediately.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 01:13 PM
1

Here's what they said: "Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, had initially planned to set the retirement age at 66 for men by 2016 and by 2020 for women. This change from the current plans would mean 3.3 million men and 3.6 million women working an extra year before drawing their pension. However, Mr Duncan Smith and Mr Webb will use the ONS figures to raise the prospect that the date could be brought forward even further – possibly to 2015 for men and 2019 for women." -Telegraph,…
/r/MensRights05/08/10 01:08 PM
1

Maybe, I'll get a chance to write that sometime soon. :)
/r/MensRights05/08/10 12:37 PM
1

Yes, 'mann' was a gender neutral term. It meant 'human', which of course specifies no gender. It became associated with men over time, because the word for 'man' fell out of use, since men were increasingly just referred to by what their professions were, and 'mann' was the core word from the previous way to say 'man'. Like doctor_alligator mentioned above, that's why men were also called Mr. blank, where blank was their profession, i.e. Archer, Baker, Smith, Barber, Miller, Butler, and Fisher. …
/r/MensRights05/08/10 12:33 PM
-1

@Joeboy "but women's penson ages will be rising from the same point as mens', and rising faster." Women's retirement age won't be rising at the the same point as men's. Read the article, it was very clear that women's retirement age would be increased years after men's age increasement. To quote it, "While the government didn't suggest a specific date for the increase in the retirement age, press reports said it could come as soon as 2016 for men, or ten years earlier than the last government pl…
/r/MensRights05/08/10 12:25 PM
0

Read the article. It's just men's that's being raised right now.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 12:20 PM
-2

@numb3rb0y "There's no misandry here." Then why are they just raising men's retirement age and not women's?
/r/MensRights05/08/10 12:03 PM
5

I have objections. Why do men have to wait years to have the same retirement age as women? Why are they starting with the age increase on men, if women have the larger increase and therefore will take longer for their retirement age to be equalized with men's? I'd really like to know these things. Doing it this way just means that men will have to wait longer to have the same retirement age as women. They're raising men's retirement age to 66; but, they're not increasing women's for years. It se…
/r/MensRights05/08/10 12:02 PM
2

@Falsehood "what I'm saying is that if you look at the most privileged people in the world, they tend to be white males." Here's a group photo of the worlds leaders at the UN. Tell me what you see. lol "http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.un.org/UN50/UNHQ-Photos/50th-2.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.un.org/Overview/milesto4.htm&usg=__LJ1XAcTvbMv70VOskkkvQA06vhc=&h=378&w=936&sz=177&hl=en&start=1&tbnid=6bk-8Qoaw9ofiM:&tbnh=82&tbnw=203&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dphoto%2Bof%2Bworlds%2Bleaders%26tbnh%3D…
/r/MensRights05/08/10 11:35 AM
3

@luthier58 "And the MOST PRIVILEDGED CLASS in the history of the world is whining that they didn't get their, what 'fair share?'." You know what real privilege is? Not getting drafted and living in a system that's designed to protect you above all others. Remember "women and children first"? Men are at the bottom of the totem pole and no one cares about us. We're third class citizens. You can do things to us that is illegal to do to mere animals, like mutilate our genitals.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 11:24 AM
2

Ideally yes; but, you might find that conservatives are much more accepting of the idea of getting equal rights for men than liberals are, currently. I agree, men's rights shouldn't be partisan, everyone should be helping men get equal rights; but, that isn't the situation right now. Not by a long shot. The current liberal president and congress have been very callous of men, and occasionally very hostile, like when Obama said that girls could do anything better than boys. Take a look at the lib…
/r/MensRights05/08/10 11:19 AM
3

You hypocrite. You were furious at Paul Elam for moderating Men's News Daily, by banning you.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 11:01 AM
5

@tomek77 "it advertises the r/MaleStudies sub-reddit as a moderated space" More like exposes it as fascist...
/r/MensRights05/08/10 10:58 AM
0

I hope you're joking.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 10:40 AM
1

Could you forward this email to me? I'd really appreciate it. My email is [email protected]
/r/MensRights05/08/10 10:37 AM
7

Yeah, WTF, seriously... Every single UK budget short changed men by not giving us domestic violence shelters like women had, and no body raised any eye brows about men getting no funding what so ever, as men were beaten and mauled. And this whole time the government there had laws on the books about making sure women had equal funding while they were the sole beneficiaries of almost every social program. What really rubs salt in the wound is that they also apparently had laws making sure minorit…
/r/MensRights05/08/10 10:28 AM
1

It might be worth posting the links of the original articles and reports so they do get the views they deserved. Granted, redundant links can be kinda annoying; but, in this case, it's probably the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 10:09 AM
1

Popularity determines a reporter's importance, not eccentricity.
/r/MensRights05/08/10 06:29 AM
1

Firstly, listen to that video again. Does it sound like I support the TYT? I'm a subscriber of theirs on YouTube; but, I wouldn't pay for their program or anything. Secondly, as for working for them, take a look at Ana's response to my video: http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/7671/anakasparianadmitsthemi.jpg Does it look like I'm a coworker of her's, if she can't even get my name right? I think you need to stop being so paranoid. I'm not secretly working for anyone.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 11:56 AM
1

Abdias, I didn't know you were on reddit. :D I'm still figuring this site out. I added you as a friend, whatever that means. :)
/r/MensRights04/08/10 11:19 AM
2

And sons, brothers, and fathers too, apparently...
/r/MensRights04/08/10 09:32 AM
1

And sons, brothers, and fathers too, apparently...
/r/MensRights04/08/10 09:32 AM
2

That's kinda funny. I thought you couldn't post the same link twice on the same reddit. If someone else had posted my video before, then thank you to them; but, this is the first time I've posted a single video to any reddit.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 09:30 AM
3

He actually appears on MSNBC from time to time, and his radio show has many listeners. His YouTube videos have a total of 269,442,103 views. He is pretty big time. For a lot of people, his show is a staple of their news intake.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 09:28 AM
1

And what, pray tell, would I be selling, if I posted this for marketing?
/r/MensRights04/08/10 09:26 AM
3

Actually, 'human' didn't imply 'man'. 'Human' implied 'human'. Men were just simply called 'human' because the old word for an adult male fell out of use and 'human' was the core word from the previous phrase that was used before. The practice of calling men 'mann' developed from necessity as a slang term; because, the word 'man' had actually been forgotten. Remember, women were also called 'mann' too, but they also had their own specific word, 'wīfmann'. Far from being the "other", as you put i…
/r/MensRights04/08/10 09:15 AM
5

What's interesting about English is the word man came from the proto-Germanic word 'mann', which meant 'human'. In old England 'wer' meant 'male' and 'wīf' meant 'female'. To say adult male human you had to put the words together and say 'wermann'. To say adult female human you had to put the words together and say 'wīfmann'. As the language evolved, women got their own word 'woman', while men were still called 'mann', or 'human'. It wasn't until recently that men were even fully acknowledged to…
/r/MensRights04/08/10 07:12 AM
3

@Sure16 "I never said don't call the police, and you are implying that defusing the situation always gets in you trouble," Do me a favor and read this: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cq4lc/lesson_learned_the_hard_way/ Men can't always go to the police; because, the police don't always care if men are being abused.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 11:06 PM
1

@Sure16 "you can't difuse the situation? You're a fucking pussy." It's awfully hard to diffuse a situation when a knife is being pointed at you...
/r/MensRights03/08/10 11:03 PM
1

@Sure16 "I don't give a fuck if a women hit's a man," I think I speak for everyone, when I say that Sure16 is a callous bastard who'd laugh at his own sons being beaten.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 11:01 PM
2

@sure16 "knocking her down is OK. You're an idiot, I don't understand How I get called a troll for thinking men shouldn't hit women," Apparently, you don't think that...
/r/MensRights03/08/10 10:59 PM
1

???
/r/MensRights03/08/10 10:32 PM
1

@endo "The 'disgusting' bigotry. Is it bigotry? I guess so. Do we need the extra disgusting?" DISGUSTING (dɪsˈgʌstɪŋ) adjective 1. Arousing disgust, repugnant; 2. loathsome Any reasonable person would see that disgusting is the perfect description for Mr. Goldman's merchandise.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 12:17 PM
1

I'm not suggesting that they are interchangeable, stop putting words in my mouth. I'm simply telling you by example that it's foolish to dismiss hate crimes just because the person responsible for those crimes was a member of the group being discriminated against.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 12:12 PM
1

I'm almost sorry I asked about it. XD It's disgustingly violent and wrong headed. Anyway, thanks for finding that for me. I appreciate it.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 06:10 AM
3

They punish users for speaking their minds. Some people may stop expressing themselves if they are consistently being censored, after all, not everyone has their preferences set to see all comments regardless of down votes.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 12:34 PM
2

I uprated it and threw in a comment for good measure. Sad to see that link almost slip by. Whoever down voted it should be ashamed of themselves. Men being denied the same protections and considerations that women get is a very serious issue.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 12:30 PM
1

It's really sad to see that men weren't protected from being stalked, and maybe still aren't in Mississippi. Research says that 1 in 6 men will be sexually assaulted before they even reach adulthood. Is it any wonder why?
/r/MensRights02/08/10 12:28 PM
3

I took a look through her site, and it says she's sponsored by domestic violence shelters. WTF
/r/MensRights02/08/10 09:07 AM
4

"Lorena was a victim of domestic violence herself - everyone has read the headlines and remembers the stand that Lorena took against domestic violence years ago." I remember that. She was the one holding the knife. She sure hates domestic violence...
/r/MensRights02/08/10 09:03 AM
1

@shady8x "Recognizing that there is discrimination is not the same thing as thinking that the whole world hates men..." Not everyone hates men, true; but, to be sure, many do, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 08:01 AM
1

As much as I like not breaking Godwin's Law, I have no problem comparing similar things.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 07:51 AM
1

@endo "Eh, the shirts create annoying social programming, but "hate monger" makes you sound like some ridiculous soccer-mom at a protest over Pokemon. Please. Stop." Obviously you haven't seen the full inventory of David & Goliath if you think 'hate-monger' is a misnomer for mister Goldman. Allow me to show you some more examples of his shirts promoting disgusting bigotry: http://menareangrynow.wordpress.com/2009/11/25/through-a-mirror-bleakly/ Read this and see if you still find my choice of wo…
/r/MensRights02/08/10 07:44 AM
1

Indeed, that may well be the psychology at work here. Brilliant observation. People think we have all the power, so they balk at us when we say we're screwed over. It's kinda like what happened to the Jews in Europe. "They control the bankz and moniez!!!1" People felt that they had everything going for them, so they didn't bat an eye when they were pleaded with by them. They say "man up" to us, because that's a culturally preprogrammed response.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 07:01 AM
1

@endo "If it were a woman, wouldn't we feel different?" I wouldn't feel any different. To me the gender of the shirt's creator doesn't matter. If it was a woman creating those sexist and bigoted shirts, I'd still say she was a lowly hate-monger.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 06:49 AM
1

@menareangrynow "Did I say any of that, Mr Zealot? Nope, just reminding us that this whole thing was set up by a dude." And I'm just reminding you that Hitler was a Jew. I'm expecting to see some consistency in your point of view, or are males not worth that consideration? Do we really have to play by different rules than everyone else?
/r/MensRights02/08/10 06:47 AM
1

Thanks for that. I was surprised to see the author's response to calls he gets from men's rights activists. He said that "The last thing we need in America is yet another victim group, this one made up seriously aggrieved males." This issue seems to be coming up a lot around me; but, the answer I keep coming to is that we males are a group of victims so why are people upset when we realize that?
/r/MensRights02/08/10 06:38 AM
2

The author deleted his work. I didn't even get a chance to read it. =( If somebody has a saved copy, please let me know.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 05:58 AM
1

@jayhammers "Not much of a battleground if men's rights advocates' post never get the light of day." Can you post some links to prove that that is happening? Yes many good posts are down rated by presumable trolls; but, are there any that are completely censored? If you would be so kind as to show us some, I'm sure you'll find that they will receive dozens of new up votes.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 05:54 AM
2

@Da_Dude_Abides "Masculism falls under the umbrella of gender studies which is semantically synonymous with feminism. Most figureheads of the movement like Warren Farrell and Christina Hoff Sommers are themselves feminists. In terms of analytical frameworks feminism and masculism are equivalent. It's analyzing gender in terms of roles and power." You're conflating men's rights and masculinism. Please note that when you said "men's rights/masculism" in your previous post, you were making an error…
/r/MensRights02/08/10 05:44 AM
4

@Da_Dude_Abides "Masculism/mens rights IS feminism in terms of frames of analysis being used." No, men's rights a civil rights movement rather than an academic philosophy, and has a very different world view from that of feminists and feminism. Take a look at their patriarchy theory. MRAs do not frame things as men being privileged, but see that we are disadvantaged, that we don't rule the world, but are instead ruled by it.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 12:43 AM
1

@kasumi1190 "You're not gonna get anywhere in this world being a white male complaining about how your being fucked over, because no one's gonna listen and you're just gonna look like a entitled pretentious ass hole." That's what they used to tell black people...
/r/MensRights02/08/10 12:39 AM
3

I can't conclusively speak for feminists and their issues; because, I'm not one of them. But, I am an MRA and I disagree that our issues are as frivolous as you say. There are systematic discriminations against males, such as the Selective Service Act forcing us to fight and die in wartime, and the Violence Against Women Act failing to give men the same protections from domestic violence that women enjoy.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 12:39 AM
4

@Leprecon "How about we do this: instead of whining about feminism downvote squads, post a link to the comment you think deserves upvotes or attention and say something like 'This guy make an excellent point about X'." That's a very pragmatic way to go about it. I'll have to remember that.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 12:30 AM
1

@endo "To be reminded, the originator of this whole thing was A MAN." So we should allow hate speech as long as it comes from a member of the same group being discriminated against? I'll remind you that Hitler was a Jew, so should we just smugly say that "To be reminded, the originator of that whole Holocaust thing was A JEW" and downplay it or just ignore it? Does the shirt creator's gender really matter?
/r/MensRights01/08/10 10:14 PM
2

You first.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 10:10 PM
2

Could you please post a link to that if you have one. I'd really love to see the story first-hand.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 10:08 PM
3

Astonishingly, this link has 212 down votes. It's like people don't care about our boys. =(
/r/MensRights01/08/10 10:06 PM
4

@nontheprohet "Or...if you must invoke RP's name, go do it in Compton or South Central LA in a Juke Joint there. Maybe you'll get a clue." Take a guess where I am right now. Me comprendas?
/r/MensRights01/08/10 02:26 AM
1

"As a technical note, it is not necessary to address people on Reddit. No one does it, since it is clear from the indented threading to whom you are replying." If it's bothering you, I'll stop. The reason why I do it, is because it helps me keep track of the conversation as threads become intricate. It helps me to see what particular person I was responding to about what specific part of their post.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 02:19 AM
1

@stemgang "I agree with you that the human rights situation in Iran is abysmal. But we've already done our share of invading in the middle-East." I never said anything about an invasion. The last thing we need is more dead men in this world, you know?...
/r/MensRights01/08/10 02:14 AM
1

We have all the time in the world. Maybe we won't get to them immediately, but someday you know? We definitely shouldn't not try.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 02:12 AM
1

@stemgang "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. It means "Anxious or fearful about the future; uneasy."" Actually, it means exactly what I think it does. Look down at the second definition from the link you posted. Apprehensive is also an adjective meaning "quick to understand", which is exactly what I intended to say. I feel you're rushing to conclusions.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 02:10 AM
1

@stemgang ""Amusement" was a poor choice of words on my part, and you picked right up on that. Are you trying to win debating points or have a conversation?" I'm trying to have a conversation. If you feel you can reword what you said to be more concise, then please do so. I'd love to hear what you have to say. Please don't snap at me, though, for working with what I'm given. Obviously, I was bound to misunderstand you, if you were using bad wording.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 02:05 AM
1

@stemgang "So, paraphrasing you: 'But what about the menz?' That just brings us back to my point: 'But what about the wimminz'?" Besides that being a terrible paraphrasing, why not a little 'But what about both of them'?
/r/MensRights01/08/10 02:01 AM
1

@stemgang "No, I am a strong advocate for men's rights...but men are oppressed in Western civilization, and women are oppressed under Islam." You see the world in black and white, with all misandry happening in the West and all misogyny happening the East. There is sexism everywhere, I'm afraid, and it's not always against one group. There are ways women are screwed over in the West, just as there are ways men are screwed over in the East. Islam oppresses both genders by forcing them to adhere t…
/r/MensRights01/08/10 01:42 AM
2

@stemgang "What is our chance of effecting change in Iran? Nil." And yet they still need us, so we should try anyway.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 01:30 AM
1

@stemgang "So while it may be amusing to consider the situation there, I don't find it very productive to do so." I don't look to impoverished and oppressed countries like Iran with amusement, I look to them with sorrow. This has nothing to do sterile efficiency and productivity. It has to do with being human.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 01:28 AM
4

@PatrickPlan8 "this man is no way a modern day Rosa Parks. So Please STFU" Why I should I be quiet? This is certainly news to celebrate and be talked about. He was faced with an incredibly similar situation to miss Parks and he rebelled successfully like her. It's seems like a great analogy, maybe not a perfect one; but, a really good one.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 12:27 AM
6

@nontheprophet "Besides, women are way smarter than men. You have to be aware of that fact." I don't think that that is a fact. I think it's a viciously sexist stereotype.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 12:24 AM
7

@nontheprophet "And leave Rosa Parks out of it. She and her people suffered FAR WORSE than any emasculated men could ever hope to." Not that equality is a dick measuring contest; but, do you know what the largest mass grave in the United States is? It's Arlington, with over 300,000 gravesites. All those boys who were sent off to be shot all around the world...they were conscripted and used as slave labor for the military, before they were killed...
/r/MensRights01/08/10 12:21 AM
2

@inabook "I want to help, but if I'm supposed to be the enemy, what can I do?" offers olive branch =)
/r/MensRights01/08/10 12:07 AM
2

@inabook "In my daily life, I see very little interest from men in any men's rights issues. When I've discussed these issues with male friends, they find most of them the be silly or irrelevant to them." Have you asked them how it felt to have to register for the draft? Have you asked them if they're circumcised, and if so how it feels to have been denied the protections to genital mutilation that women enjoy? Maybe they'll find their safety and sexual health to relevant and pertinent to them.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 12:06 AM
3

@stemgang "I had to pull a "What about the wimminz?" just the other day. Men suffer great injustice in the West, but regarding men's rights in Iran...where women have no rights at all...was a stretch too far." Actually, even in a place like Iran there are many important men's issues. For example, take a look at their war with Iraq. The Basij were known for rounding boys up and using them to detonate mines by forcing them to run across mine fields. Also, in Iran, widowed husbands are only awarded…
/r/MensRights01/08/10 12:00 AM
1

@scratend0788 "Every one of the largest feminist blogs, lobbies and groups have openly lionised women like valerie summers. Every one of these groups persists in propagating pointedly anti-male propaganda about DV, rape, sexual harassment, child abuse, etc.." I know the National Organization for Women supported Valorie; but, I don't know about any others. I've also heard that the SCUM Manifesto is required reading in some women's studies courses. Maybe you happen to have some links from these or…
/r/MensRights31/07/10 07:40 PM
2

@kloo2yoo "if you're arguing for mens' rights (the concept) you're welcome in /mr. I look forward to seeing more of your posts." Thank you very much. I do indeed argue for that, and I look forward to spending some more time with you all.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 07:33 PM
2

@kloo2yoo "I've made my response on your blog." Actually that was Schopenbecq's blog. That was his article. My blog is here: http://menareangrynow.wordpress.com/
/r/MensRights31/07/10 07:29 PM
5

@aGorilla "Stop downvoting the guy you are arguing with, and I'll take you more seriously." Tisn't me.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 03:24 PM
8

@nontheprophet "Remember who has the vagina. Stop being one." Having a vagina doesn't make you a bad person, and neither does coming to terms with the problems you face. I really have had enough of the "boys don't cry" mentality. It's time for us wake up and start caring about ourselves.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 02:50 PM
7

@nontheprophet "If you play a victim, you'll be a victim. End of story." But Mirko Fischer was a victim. He wasn't playing, and neither are men... I get what you're saying about not letting these things consume you so you give up on life. I get it; but, we men need to acknowledge that we are victims of society. If we don't understand and recognize our predicament we can't rise up and change our situation. Realizing your victim-hood doesn't make you a bad person or incapable of bettering yourself…
/r/MensRights31/07/10 02:47 PM
11

The parallels are there. I think it's unreasonable to expect a perfect analogy. It's not like men aren't called slurs by bigots, and aren't told where to sit on vehicles. There have been times on public buses where I've gotten dirty stares for 'being so rude' as to not offer my seat to a standing women. When I was a boy I was always told to offer my seat to women... Look at Korea, for example. They have special water fountains and parking places for women. Or the fact that men cannot get help in…
/r/MensRights31/07/10 02:04 PM
-2

@scratend0788 "So in the space of 70 upvotes we go from having about 30% mass downvoting feminist busy bodies to about 90% chronically outraged feminists lunatics." That isn't encouraging, at all. :(
/r/MensRights31/07/10 01:45 PM
0

@scratend0788 "Of course they have a very men'sStudies perspective of men'sRights, so they think we ought to spend our time talking about how insecure we are about our masculinity and how we desperately want to be just like women but can't becasue of patriarchal gender roles." That's kinda funny, because I had thought feminists didn't even believe that sexual identities like "masculinity" really existed in any meaningful way. I thought they said that things like that were just social constructs.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 01:36 PM
2

@breastmilkofdeath "The author is actually acting as a prime example of the "MRA vs. feminism" meta-movement that I hate." I can certainly understand that. I, myself, am not so much an anti-feminist as I am an anti-sexist. That does mean I oppose many feminists and much feminist theory; but, I see nothing wrong with many feminists individually. I'm actually a big fan of Wendy McElroy and the iFeminists. On YouTube, where I spend a lot of my time talking about gender issues I'm friends with a num…
/r/MensRights31/07/10 01:25 PM
3

Hi, allow me to introduce myself. I'm an men's rights activist who primarily uses YouTube for discussing my thoughts on men's rights. Recently, I've heard a buzz on several blogs about the MensRights reddit becoming unbearable. I've listened to some horror stories about people here being dismissive of social issues like men being murdered. The people I've talked to describe this place as increasingly less focused and increasingly hostile. Being a open and fair minded person, I'd thought I'd try …
/r/MensRights31/07/10 12:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter