TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mtux96 Archive

View 20 posts and 883 comments by mtux96 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
632

mtux96/r/MensRights04/02/13 09:45 AM
91

mtux96/r/MensRights26/05/12 05:26 PM
51

mtux96/r/MensRights23/12/10 09:26 AM
32

mtux96/r/MensRights29/03/12 05:46 AM
14

mtux96/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:20 PM
11

mtux96/r/MensRights23/04/11 06:16 PM
8

mtux96/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:30 AM
7

mtux96/r/MensRights28/06/12 06:49 AM
7

mtux96/r/MensRights10/11/12 07:17 PM
6

mtux96/r/MensRights21/05/11 06:05 AM
6

mtux96/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:12 AM
6

mtux96/r/MensRights07/07/11 06:14 AM
6

mtux96/r/MensRights24/01/12 04:12 AM
4

mtux96/r/MensRights15/01/13 09:42 AM
4

mtux96/r/MensRights08/08/12 10:01 PM
4

mtux96/r/MensRights06/12/11 08:49 PM
3

mtux96/r/MensRights01/05/11 06:11 AM
3

mtux96/r/MensRights22/11/11 06:14 AM
1

mtux96/r/MensRights13/04/12 07:07 AM
1

mtux96/r/MensRights30/12/11 03:43 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That wasn't the OP that said that but another person. But it's off to say that as different people grieve differently. It might appear one might be taking it harder which is why saying one person is affected more if off-base. I'm not sure if that thread is a place to start a discourse in the way you did. You might want to tone down your discourse as well as it's going to tune people off from what you are saying in the first place. A reasonable approach is better suited for any situation. Harsher…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 09:27 AM
1

Just get rid of Father's day...and Mother's day and have Parent's day. I think it's just time to end both. But I think mother's will have more trouble with this as they get more presents and gifts than fathers and stores deck themselves out for mother's day and father's would be lucky to get a single table.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:28 AM
3

Cross out the word "male" and he has a point. A lot of people think they are entitled to anything they want. Some women need to know they are not entitled to half their spouse's wealth just because they married them or a monthly payment for splitting up with them, but that is hardly news. People in general have too big a sense of entitlement in one way or another. Different people feel they are just entitled to other things.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:23 AM
1

The problem is that everyone gets discriminated in one way or another. Women have their issues just as men have theirs. As a male working retail, I'm expected to lift the heavier objects. Of course, I'm probably weaker than some of the women there.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 06:54 AM
3

I sent my two sons to a family friend that was a male. Of course, people might look at it as strange, but in reality children are at risk no matter what sex the childcare worker. They can abuse them just as well.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 06:52 AM
13

Red solo cups are big at US parties apparently.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:49 AM
2

The problem is there are certain seeds of truth in things, even said by a madman, but one should not follow the path of the madman as violence is not the way to get people to see your point.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:07 PM
9

I guess I don't follow any of those people as this is the first I'm hearing about this other hashtag/
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:43 AM
9

Maybe we can just go on by claiming all women are lying assholes who say they want a "nice guy" and call you a "nice guy" and then go and date some jerk and tell you how bad they are treating you, which of course I've had happen to myself numerous times, but then again I never went off and decided to kill people over it because I'm mentally sane enough not to. But then again, people want to make this into some sexist act rather than the big elephant in the room which is mental illness. BTW I am …
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:37 AM
65

Getting harrased at work? Quit that job then. Classic Victim Blaming.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:17 AM
2

..because it's really only creepy if they are unattractive.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:14 AM
1

Yup. The real big flag is that she got upset that they were having unprotected sex and she got mad at him for not cumming inside. I think she wanted that child on some level. But everyone is right....paternity test which she'll probably flip out about getting as well, so he needs to make sure he's not alone with her when he asks and possibly wait until courts demand him to appear for child support.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 07:32 PM
11

"Learn to shoot, because locks only keep out honest people and those afraid of breaking glass."
/r/MensRights03/04/14 06:26 AM
19

It's easier to create outrage by saying it's about rape.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 04:41 PM
6

If an employee's tips combined with the employer's direct wages of at least $2.13 an hour do not equal the federal minimum hourly wage, the employer must make up the difference. But they don't get paid less than minimum wage, and if they make zero tips, then the employer does owe them minimum wage. But just because the employer doesn't pay them minimum wage does not mean they make less than minimum wage. So who really cares who pays them as long as they get paid, but you just want to make it sou…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 05:33 AM
7

Any which way, if they expect to live on tips, then they should work for them and make sure they get them rather than just assume they are entitled to them. Edit: actually you need to do your research What is the minimum wage for workers who receive tips? An employer may pay a tipped employee not less than $2.13 an hour in direct wages if that amount plus the tips received equal at least the federal minimum wage, the employee retains all tips and the employee customarily and regularly receives m…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:51 AM
4

If that's the case, then the waiter should have told him that instead of copping an attitude. At least explain the situation.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:35 AM
4

Waiters cannot get paid less than minimum wage. The restaurant will still need to pay them the amount to get minimum wage, but then again will probably not work there for much longer. But that argument is weak and goes to show that waiters are just some entitled group that thinks they deserve money regardless of how they perform. If the waiters don't like it, they don't have to a) sign up for that job or b) actually work for their tips since they already know they rely on their tip money to make…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:33 AM
3

It's pretty safe to say she won't get my vote but that is for other reasons. If the Republicans don't put up anyone good, looks like I'll be voting third party once again.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 07:39 AM
2

Technically, around the age of 25 is when the brain fully develops..
/r/MensRights22/03/14 07:28 AM
2

I believe that bill failed to garner enough support.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:13 AM
3

Mocking tones and generalizations do not make for effective arguments.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 01:02 AM
6

just like feminists do with men You mean just like you call everyone racist who disagrees with you like feminists call people who don't agree with them misogynists. But then again maybe some people think it's really time to just help people regardless of race, color, and gender and focus on need. Maybe I'm just naive into thinking the world would be better if we stop thinking in terms of labels which will only divide us. Backlash isn't really want you think it is. Just because people are saying …
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:51 PM
3

You see a group suffering unbelievable disparities but you want to circle the wagons to keep people from helping them. This shit needs to stop Where is anyone saying that they should stop helping these people? It's more about why are not X and Y not included like A and B? This program is inherently a good program, but it falters when it decide to discriminate just because X and Y happen to on average fair better than A and B. Averages have a way of misleading. Just because one side fairs better,…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:58 AM
1

It's all great and all that it does help some young men and boys, but just because average standard of living metrics are worse in certain races, it doesn't mean they magically disappear completely from everyone who happens to be a different race that race of people that have less troubles.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:45 AM
4

Do you realize whites have 20 times the average wealth of blacks and Hispanics? Do you realize the pay gap between black/Hispanic men is bigger than is between men and women? It's not offset by marriage or partnership between the sexes and they aren't down because they with the children. They just stay poor. If feels great living in the 13% of whites living in poverty and knowing that no one gives a damn about me. There is no reason to segregate these programs at all. If lower amounts of whites …
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:41 AM
4

That they cannot have their cake and eat it too. They want to make certain choices, but do not want to accept the consequences of those choices.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 07:20 AM
1

I was told that a tool's default state is that of a weapon, that it didn't matter what the intended use for something was, if it could be used to hurt or kill, that's how people would see it. There's your excuse to walk around school naked while carrying nothing, including books, pens and pencils. Clothes can be taken off and used to strangle others. Books can be used to bash people with. You could stab people with pens and pencils.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 06:56 AM
6

People who want vengeance inflicted on women because of the injustice men have suffered. Spreading the injustice around does not equal justice As long as men are sentenced to a long prison sentence and charged as a felon for doing this, women should have to face the same consequences. While there may be some agreement that certain laws shouldn't exist, they just cannot be enforced differently because of the gender of the "criminal" or "victim."
/r/MensRights25/02/14 06:50 PM
0

I wonder if he'd get more slack if he called himself a Men's Rights Activist. I doubt it.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 08:19 AM
2

and that I only wanted to file charges in retaliation for her filing charges against me Perfect.. go falsely accuse a female of sexually harassing you, then afterwards go sexual harass her. Hey.. she's only filing as retaliation. /s
/r/MensRights14/02/14 07:20 AM
4

How is it possible to budget for money I don't have? The response was... Learn to budget. well obviously you are paying too many bills. Cut down on other less important ones like paying your rent. /s
/r/MensRights12/02/14 07:33 AM
1

I don't think either gender should be prevented from participating in any cause. But I think most of the angst is from runs like the following for "women only" http://www.womensonlyrun.com/cancer/index.asp
/r/MensRights12/02/14 07:31 AM
1

Good thing that there are other products one can purchase... Still.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 04:37 PM
9

She is not necessary an illegal immigrant. A green card holder could be deported for committing a crime.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:40 AM
8

Not necessarily. A green card holder could still get deported if they commit a crime.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:38 AM
10

She's just as guilty as her boyfriend was for trying to hide the fact that it occurred.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:36 AM
6

I think it's more about deleting comments of opposite opinion. I am pretty sure if a woman named "Jennifer" started commenting on a opinion opposite of theirs, they will just accuse her of being a man and ban her.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 06:16 PM
1

Men generally don't body shame other men or women. Shut up, you wimp! That is a thinly shielded form of body shaming. You don't have muscles or lift weights, you are a wimp.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 05:08 AM
4

A lot of women though seem to have specific wedding visions and wishes. And sometimes, they forget that it's also another person's wedding as well. Just because they have some vision of how they want their wedding, it doesn't mean that is not what their partner will like. But then again, the whole wedding industry is a "fraud" to begin with. Too many throw too much of their money into their dream wedding instead of forming a better foundation. The money used on some fancy smancy wedding could be…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 05:00 AM
1

My wife felt the same way. For our first child, we went with a female OBGYN because she felt more comfortable with. Basically, it wasn't a good experience. She always seemed to rush things, would try to get my wife to buy other things unrelated to the pregnancy, and other little things which we didn't think much of at the time. Even the birth of our first child seemed rushed. We went into the hospital as she was having labor pains. Apparently, my wife wasn't moving on along enough so she gave he…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 07:47 AM
1

Red's story isn't one of a man putting her up to it. Red overtook her husband to be the Crime Boss.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 05:22 AM
1

IRL, the owner would have given the women the $100 bill for their inconvenience if they complained.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 01:44 AM
3

or "you're just trying to get in their pants" if you offer them a seat.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 01:43 AM
4

Hell I won't sit down in a men's resterroom in a bar or a restaurant because I know the seat will be covered with urine. Urine is much better than a mix of urine and blood which you would find in the women's room.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:05 AM
9

You could have two unisex bathrooms.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:02 AM
1

It's not the content of the men's magazine that is misogyny. It's the fact that there is a magazine targeted solely towards men is the reason why it's misogyny. And, remember there is no such thing as discrimination against men or misandry. /s
/r/MensRights31/12/13 06:55 AM
3

I unsubscribed from that sub months ago. It was becoming a rape of a single individual every other submission, which isn't exactly "WorldNews" or any where close to major news. To me it seemed like it got taken over by some group bent on setting up some agenda.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 08:45 AM
1

Why do we even need to worry about gender in shows that are primarily targeted to a specific gender to begin with? There's nothing wrong with targeting shows towards a specific demographic, not that people still cannot watch even if they are not part of that demographic. Boys have their shows and girls have theirs and sometimes there exists a show that targets both. Not every show has to target both. I used to watch many shows outside of the target audience or average demographic that watched a …
/r/MensRights28/12/13 08:00 AM
2

Always good to see domestic violence still being used for entertainment long past it being funny anymore It's funny if it's against men of course.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 07:27 PM
8

If you want to see your family on Christmas.. just don't go to Prison. Doh!
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:21 AM
2

You are paying for a service, not hiring a sitter if you are dropping them off to the sitter who is also watching other children. If you hired the sitter to come to your home and only watch your children, it would be a different situation. Your sitter is merely a child care center per say.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 09:44 PM
0

So then the inverse should happen in the education field. Men should receive $5 for every $1 that women get as more women go into the education field than men.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 09:39 PM
102

Men are affected by height... and they CANNOT do anything about it. Women can go on diets or get surgery to fix their weight problem(most of the time).
/r/MensRights10/12/13 07:26 AM
1

A female co-worker has a larger phone than I have. I have a Nexus 4. If you don't like the size of a phone, buy a smaller one then. I don't own a Galaxy Note because it's too big for my manly hands and smaller phones just fit better into my hand, even though they're large enough to hold a larger one anyways.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 08:51 AM
1

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sam-ressler/lulu-the-worst-app_b_4340750.html There's the article. Not a glowing review of the app by any means, but the story is framed as bad for women...of course.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 05:54 PM
1

I saw through the fact that GoldieBlox has simply produced yet another pink, gender polarized toy for girls by financially exploiting the already excessive “Girl Power” climate and I am bewildered why most parents and the media are heralding the ad as “awesome”. I think most people fail to realize that GoldieBlox is just repackaging old "boy" toys by dressing them up in pink as GoldieBlox denounces pretty pink girlie toys. “You like to buy us pink toys… And everything else is for boys!”, And not…
/r/MensRights27/11/13 08:36 AM
1

It's probably because HuffPO did a piece on it. Now people are just downloading it to see what it's about. Not really about actually using it, but rather seeing what it is about.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 08:15 AM
2

Or withdraw consent mid-coitus.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:24 AM
2

Wait until more and more women start having to pay alimony. Alimony will finally get abolished.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 08:09 AM
2

I think it's a satirical, Ironic protest.. I hope it is.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 07:36 AM
1

If a man killed his wife in this fashion, would he even be given credibility if he claimed it was in self defense? I think the issue that the defense is claiming self defense brings this closer to an issue as opposed to just a woman killing a man and undergoing a trial for it.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 07:26 AM
2

"Men dominate women with unrealistic beauty standards" and "men are pigs who will sleep with anything." actually contradict each other. If men will sleep with anything, then looks don't matter and thusly men do not dominate women with unrealistic beauty standards. But I guess the same could just be said of women who dominate men unrealistic wealth standards, but in the end everyone has their own set of standards. Some might have unrealistic goals of what their mate should be and I have a feeling…
/r/MensRights12/11/13 07:39 AM
1

Are you sure Palin wasn't heard of because she was really unqualified to be Vice President as a running mate to McCain who was old and ancient? Had Condi Rice been the nominee, I have doubts you'd heard many cracks at her besides being in the Bush administration. Palin was severely unqualified and it showed when she had interviews along with the VP debates. Had McCain been a younger fellow, it would have probably made for a lesser issue as well as people would have been not dreading the fact the…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 08:03 AM
1

And people working fast food think they are under-valued as well. Welcome to life.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 07:12 AM
3

"That's not a man... guy in green just attacked a girl.." What I thought I heard some lady say in the video..
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:55 PM
4

Then he killed her in self defense and gets life in prison as a plea deal.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:54 PM
1

I think people should just place the seat in which ever way they please. It isn't rocket science to check the seat's position.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:25 AM
10

Single women can still get pregnant.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 07:49 AM
5

I think men just need to start going to the doctor every month now, just for anything.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:57 AM
17

This isn't about Maternity/Paternity Leave. This is about health coverage for maternity issues. Something a man will never need until science figures out a way for men to give birth. A single man will never need it and once he becomes married, it'll be more of a family plan.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:56 AM
1

California, it's illegal. According to the ABC training I did, which BTW was taught by a woman.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 06:20 AM
2

Someone should email her back that.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 06:23 AM
3

The bigger issue in this instance with how it is presented in this subject is that you have people calling for stricter laws on something because someone was able to allegedly close the case due to connections. It's not the law that needs to become stricter, but the enforcement of said laws that need to be stricter. But I do agree with what you said.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 06:11 AM
5

You forgot about not pouring a whole bottle of perfume on your body. No one wants to smell you from a mile away, no matter how good you think the smell is.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 06:02 AM
1

I would like to know myself. However I have doubts that they have or will.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 02:25 AM
4

Have the police set up a sting to catch females?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 10:39 PM
2

Since when does knowing a geographical area and it's demographics give you knowledge of the gender of a criminal? Spoiler: it doesn't.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 04:41 PM
2

As if a sign that says "Boys" will stop anyone other than a boy from entering it. It doesn't matter where the hell you live. You can go to that school and you cannot say "I know it's a male." because I live there unless you happen to know the person who did it. There is a possibility a girl could be doing this, but there is a chance a boy could be doing this as well. Heck going into the opposite sex bathroom would be a good place to do it if you wanted to throw suspicion off of yourself. And who…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:00 AM
3

it's quite safe to say this is a male making these threats. Prove it and furthermore prove that it was all males in that school. You cannot do either and is an assumption. Sure a male could have done it, but it doesn't mean a female didn't and it doesn't mean all males should suffer from the sole action of one or more of their peers. I guess everyone should be locked up when someone commits murder.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 06:41 AM
1

It's just football is god culture. Same thing happened at Penn State.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 07:05 AM
2

You're living.. You have stage 0 cancer as cancer can develop over time.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:49 AM
1

Is there any good charities that deal with DV but not ones that just focus on women and children?
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:43 AM
7

Want to open a battered men's center? Nobody gives a shit. That is sexist.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 06:18 AM
2

Empathy is the right term here as it deals with the ability to understand and share what another person is feeling.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 06:14 AM
1

It's just a sad commentary that it takes women being abused in this fashion for reform to happen. Reform needs to happen and I have a feeling it will be made in a way that does nothing for all those in the past that are being forced to pay money each month to their ex-wife and in the end made in a way where it still only benefits women. But then in the end, reform in Florida will mean nothing as people will just "move" to Alabama and file for divorce there.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 06:05 AM
4

Bring your own condoms.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 06:22 AM
11

As long as males are punished harshly for it, females should be punished harshly for it as well. But I do agree that the laws do need to ease up on those situations.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 06:08 AM
3

"you guys just have no idea how it feels to live in fear. To always have to be aware of your surroundings and watching every guy you see". As if men don't have those same fears while walking about and being near some sketchy looking strangers.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 06:25 AM
20

I've seen short.. not enough muscle... too fat... too skinny when it comes to hate towards men.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:51 PM
1

...if my parents had money, I'd probably own a Condo as well.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:39 AM
3

Technically, we don't know if both parties are in the wrong here. She only said he got a message from Kelsi. It says nothing about the content of the message. I've been with a girl that was that crazy to throw a fit if I happened to talk to some other girl, no matter what the context was.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:24 AM
1

Why not both? I watched both. Though, I was younger when I watched Mr. Wizard.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:48 AM
2

Perhaps we should just start teaching young women to stop being so superficial and bigoted towards old white men and stop worrying about social image...
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:46 AM
3

Science and nerds always went together and it never stopped men from getting into those fields, even when being a nerd was the complete opposite of being cool. It's not like they are being stereotyped as pedophiles if they teach in elementary schools or work in childcare.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 05:40 AM
3

A lot of people will not call the police under the poor assumption of a thought that someone else had to already called them.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:38 AM
3

That would be all fine and dandy if the author of the article didn't make it sound like the ex-bf did a horrible thing by not defending a woman that he didn't know. The author expected him to interject himself into the situation over something she didn't think through before she decided to jump in as if she had a chance to stop the fight.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:35 AM
2

Looks like the same story to me. However, if this included a female victim would they prosecute the boys whether or not the mother "cooperated?"
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:39 PM
5

Wow.... Child is gaining weight and it is his fault even though he has her only 8 hours each week.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:47 AM
9

"five people killed in fire, including four women." Try readings ones that read "five people killed in fire, including one woman."
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:49 PM
2

I believe the district won in a default judgement as she went awol and is at large. But I might be wrong.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 08:01 AM
2

Simple question. Could wearing shorts like that in that environment be a OSHA violation. Most places I've seen everyone were wearing long overalls no matter how hot it was outside.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 07:36 AM
7

It's a no win situation. You don't give her your seat, you're a bum. You give her your seat then you are a bum trying to get in her pants. But that article reeks of entitlement of a "cute girl."
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:49 AM
1

I've seen more women make those type of jokes than men. I think because most men realize they'd get in trouble for anything remotely resembling those kind of jokes in any type of business world.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:45 AM
2

All this hubbub over nothing but what consenting adults are doing. I feel bad for the wife, but she could just leave him if she wanted to.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 06:53 AM
3

It's not normal to see this activity in normal life. Most people will just be shocked to see it happen and not know what to do in the first place. By the time, they realize what is happening and what they should do then most of the time the offender has moved on. You cannot expect a stranger to intercede in something they do not how to react to out of shock. It is easy to play "what would I do in that situation?" but what actually happens when you are actually confronted in that situation is dif…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 09:10 AM
0

Nothing new here. It's easier for men to gain attention from some women if they have more money as women to gain attention from some men if they have better looks. The problem is that men get "demonized" by folks because they are being superficial over looks where there's less backlash over women being superficial over money and it even gets encouraged by the thought that they should be with someone who adds something superficially into the relationship.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 06:11 PM
2

Trying to find another source lead me to this: http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/indian-airline-denies-hiring-slim-women-to-save-fuel-113063000213_1.html Somehow this story became a story about them only hiring Slim women as opposed to those who are not slim women which includes larger women.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 08:16 PM
7

I'm pretty sure a list of women being rated even without the rapish comments would be problematic on its own as well.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 06:05 AM
1

Just keep your sex as female. easy solution. It's only an online social network.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 07:36 AM
9

It is a useless quiz based on opinion. Answer 0 to most of the questions that are "anti-women" and 5 to the "pro-women" questions and you get a very low as in good score.I got an 0.3 and then 2.5 on benevolent. I've seen better quizzes on those juvenile quiz websites.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 08:57 PM
1

Safeway/Vons does it every year.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:45 PM
15

After thinking about it more now, this kid is probably going to think daddy left over this "father's day gift" without realizing what this "gift" was.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 08:58 PM
10

Using kids as pawns like this should result in the automatic loss of custody and any demands they are demanding. If you cannot do this as an adult, you don't deserve to be treated like one.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 06:40 PM
3

Where you live now from what I've read online is a one-party consent state which means only one party needs to agree to it, so you should be fine. Where you came from was a All-Party consent state which is a no-no. BUt I'm not a lawyer and google might be failing me. Here's what I found at one site: http://www.pimall.com/nais/n.tel.tape.law.html I still recommend looking for yourself to be sure.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 06:18 AM
5

Yes seriously, that paragraph was ignoring what a lot fathers do for their family. Mothers tend to do all those things because they are not out in the workplace busting their butts to try to earn a living to support the family. Mothers/Fathers have more time to be the nurturing parent when they are stay-at-home types.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:47 PM
6

"The sarcasm is strong in this one" -Gandalf
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:32 PM
5

Personally, I think Father's day needs to abolished, just as well Mother's Day. Instead we should just have Parent's day.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 09:07 PM
1

OP actually used the same time as the Breitbart page.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 06:59 PM
0

Well it is the same title used in the Breitbart piece. But it might be editorialized, though the intent of what Obama said is pretty clear in his speech. It is politics after all and politicians love saying things in such a way to gain support from one group without completing alienating the other and if someone takes him up to task on it, they'll just claim they never said such a thing even though they did mean it by stating someone in figurative speech. I can possibly agree on the title, but t…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 06:59 PM
2

Someone doesn't agree with your assessment.. Yeah just quiet them. Plenty of groups out there that do that. I guess you are one of those types of people.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 06:49 PM
3

If you don't want to see it that way then, you can put on the blinders to what he is really stating by using the 77 cents being close to equal to a dollar being bad math as an analogy to the deniers of the wage gap being wrong. You are taking it to be too literal. He is really stating that if you don't believe the wage gap exists then you are stupid as in math if you think 77 =(or close to) 100 then you are stupid and your math is bad. Everyone knows 77 cents is no where close to equally a dolla…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 06:13 PM
2

Come on now, you know very well what he meant. You know he has meant that women are getting paid less and if you deny that, your math is bad. He's saying exactly what the title states without actually stating it. But perhaps we should take him to task and why boys in school are not being taught equally in school?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:47 PM
2

ehhh.. entitled teenagers who feel they can wear whatever they damn please to school. There's a whole lot of stuff in school dress codes that applies to boys as well. No facial hair. In my school, if a boy wore a button shirt with rounded edges, it had to be tucked in. (square cut button shirts untucked were fine). No shorts at all....ever even in 90 degree weather with 100% humidity. /endgetoffmylawnrant
/r/MensRights11/06/13 09:52 AM
1

So essentially, you are okay with slut shaming. If a person or society feels it should not condone sleeping around a lot, then people and society should be ok with slut shaming them to not condone the behavior.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 09:41 AM
1

Men typically get "slut shamed" in a different fashion. "Creep" "Momma's boy" "dweller of mommy and daddy's basement." "Neckbeard" "Fedora wearer." "Player"(Yes this does have a negative connotation as well.) "free loader" "scumbag" "leach" "Broke bloke" "sissy" "pussy" "pussy-whipped" "pedo"(if you happen to be with a younger woman when you are obviously much older even if they are over 18) "MRA"
/r/MensRights11/06/13 09:20 AM
1

You should not have mentioned that to her as she could just try to get the courts to block your escape.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 08:01 AM
1

$4k a month? I don't know but I would consider moving elsewhere.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 08:00 AM
3

I'm assuming so IF he could find something like that. But then if he did, could ex-wife try to up the amount of alimony?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:54 AM
4

BTW ex-wife also convinced him to move to Florida before coming out as a lesbian and divorcing him as Florida is a no-fault state with lifetime alimony.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:53 AM
4

Why would anyone receiving $4k a month from an ex want to get married to another person? I think that $48K a year would be good enough to worth to outweigh the benefits of marrying somebody else. I'm sure many divorcees stay divorced and stay BF/GF with someone else as they receive alimony.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:51 AM
7

I came to this subreddit because of this video. I'm a feminist, but things like this are why men need to be active about equality of the sexes. I hate women being treated like children who need a man's help. That's why things like this happen. The woman should be expected to take care of herself, because BEING A WOMAN DOESN'T MAKE HER WEAKER OR IN NEED OF HELP ANY MORE THAN A MAN! That should be the true heart of feminism. I wish she could be outed for being such a hypocrite, it's disgusting tha…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:41 AM
2

I don't think many would argue that it does not affect women negatively. Alimony does normally affect men more than women however and if it were switched around where women were affected more, I would wonder if that latest law to end lifetime alimony would have actually been signed or not.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:31 AM
2

So you can install a catholic monarchy? I hate that mask with a passion and in my mind it discredits anything the wearer has to say.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 06:07 AM
4

We had a couple of boys at my school that wore skirts one day during the late spring months because boys were only allowed to wear pants(though girls were able to wear skirts) even in the summer when it was hot in a school with barely any A/c. I think the next year or the year after boys were able to wear shorts during the late spring months.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:50 PM
3

But it still isn't hate speech. It only makes the title here inaccurate.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:27 PM
3

Even if Paul Elam is being inaccurate with his stats, it doesn't matter. Offering an opinion that opposes feminist opinions is not hate speech. It's not abusive to anyone.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:22 PM
1

Then, why is Facebook bowing to the pressure to remove "questionable material" from certain groups? Couldn't those groups just do as you suggest and just leave Facebook?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:19 PM
16

I doubt a page about beating women labelled as satire would stay up that long
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:15 PM
0

Is this the same form of consent in the same way that people "have consent" to share music online with friends?
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:22 PM
18

Went to the website listed.. They changed their name to "Futures without Violence." Guess they forgot the "against women" at the end. They have 2 sections.. Women and girls & Men and boys. Women and Girls talk about items about how programs are becoming available to stop violence against them. Men and Boys talks about how Men and Boys can stop violence. What about the men who get abused and killed by women? (Think the Jodie Arias case or even Phil Hartman) What about mothers who beat or kill the…
/r/MensRights02/06/13 05:53 PM
-3

I know a lot of people are bashing on the person asking the question, but I don't think it's very deserved on her part as I think people in her life are questioning why she is with this poor guy when she can be with someone else. She's a victim of letting peer pressure getting the best of her thoughts. I think she is just confused at the moment with everyone whispering in her ears. She does admit it to be a sexist fantasy to use her looks to nab a rich guy instead of being with some smoe who is …
/r/MensRights02/06/13 06:28 AM
2

For years, women’s advocates have worked to establish alternatives for mothers convicted of crimes, saying the lives of their children become so upended they often end up in jail themselves. Now...Is that because their mother went to prison or was it the example that the mother made of herself to her children that caused them to go to prison?
/r/MensRights02/06/13 06:14 AM
1

Based on that thought. I was raped by my ex-GF because she did not disclose that she was cheating on me. I didn't have that information, therefore I could not legitimately give consent. </s> Absence of consent = rape.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 04:42 PM
1

Pretty much. As women can be a direct link to passing HIV to a child, it is very reasonable to view men as a carrier that can pass HIV to a child, albeit in a more indirect fashion.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 09:02 AM
3

Hiv-positive man has sex with pregnant HIV-Negative woman. -> HIV infects woman. -> HIV infects fetus.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 07:25 AM
4

Sometimes it can just be the failure of hitting the shift key.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:22 AM
1

Though, girls can be much more expensive to raise on the flip side of the coin. Ever see how much cosmetics cost?
/r/MensRights27/05/13 06:19 AM
2

I wouldn't even cover the "provoked" ones as it typically promotes the thought that the person who committed the act finally showed their bullies they were wrong and that since no one cares about them now, they will after they are dead. It's not a good idea to cover them at all.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 07:46 AM
12

Mustached.. definitely mustached. Also unattractive. I mean how did you get someone to have children with if you are unattractive? Big and burly sometimes as well.. or skinny and unkept.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:35 AM
8

You just don't fit the child molester profile.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:18 AM
2

Men shouldn't have to worry about "having to prove" that the kids are his kids. Why should the police even bother fielding these calls? I'd be willing to bet if someone calls the police claiming that there was a woman at the park playing with kids that the police wouldn't even bother showing up. Police should not respond to these calls on men either, unless people actually see him doing anything inappropriate with the children, but that would apply to women as well.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:16 AM
1

"Those women should be at home baking and washing dishes." Of course, you'd get mobbed if you said that.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:05 AM
2

The only thing I've noticed before was parents telling their kids that it was time to go when I got there, but that might have been because it was time for them to go.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:02 AM
2

I think the worst thing that ever happened to me being parked in front a neighbor's house was park in front of his house as the spots in front of where I was renting was full. His reason? My daughters need to park there and it isn't right they have to walk farther as they might be attacked or raped. Keep in mind that this was a very nice neighbor in a rich part of town....and there was a spot directly in front of my car for his daughters to park, as if an extra 8 feet is going to make a differen…
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:00 AM
1

I don't know if it is, but I've been picked on through my life to not give a damn what other people think of me anymore.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 06:56 AM
3

I recommend getting out of there and never babysit for them ever. They can find their own sitters.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 06:56 AM
1

The two of you should have then just walked out and let that couple find their own babysitter who they would have to pay more for since they are not family. He shouldn't have to deal with this BS as being accused of being a child molester just by being male. I would have also walked out because next thing you know it the wife is going to ask her daughter if your SO did anything to her.. He'll regret being there if she says anything but no as I'm sure the wife would keep on asking "to be sure"whi…
/r/MensRights25/05/13 06:55 AM
15

Yes. I think she is confusing "validity" with "worth." And I'm assuming this is backlash coming from "women's study" about the wage gap being argued against by using the choices women choose like choosing women's studies as a major is brought up to explain why women are "paid less" than men. You are not going to earn as much with a women's studies degree than an engineering degree and that applies to both men and women.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:59 PM
1

"Colton said he had offered Kaitlyn a plea deal in March in which the charges would be reduced to child abuse, a third degree felony; he would recommend to the judge a sentence of community control and probation; and he would not discourage the judge from wiping her record clean. The offer is good until May 24, after which they will move toward a July 15 trial date, he said." Would a 18 year old male get the same plea deal?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:03 PM
12

Well clearly I know you are being sarcastic in that response, however the issue is that everyone parades Mothers around as if they are all these wonderful angels that could do no wrong. Go ahead and go out and tell someone you don't talk to your "mom." They act like you are some sort of monster. You don't talk to your "dad", it is normally no big deal. I always cringe when I hear the phrase, "you know how good a man is by the way he treats his mother." Why? How does this define a good man? Is a …
/r/MensRights13/05/13 07:05 AM
3

Maybe that is her thought. Edit: also, she might want the death penalty for more chances of appeal because I believe I read, though I might have heard it from somewhere that death penalty get more chances of appeal, so she might be trying to bet on that.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 06:28 AM
11

"You cannot teach a pig to sing and it's just going to annoy the pig." This is referencing her thought that women tend to try to change men in their relationship where men tend to not care according to her. I don't see this as a big issue as she's not really describing men as pigs, but using an analogy where the pig represents a man or person who must likely won't change how they are regardless of how much you nag them. "Teaching" a man to sing would not work as a man could be taught to sing.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:47 PM
5

And yet she decides it is smart to start shit with a group of "5 to 6" boys from her own admission and decides it to be a smart idea to walk up towards them. That really doesn't add up. It does really sound like she was walking up there to start trouble knowing that he would not hit her back and if he did then he would get in big trouble for it. But maybe she is just one very very stoooopid person. I think the "I'm just a small helpless girl." card reinforces that she holds the belief that she c…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:55 AM
1

Someone needs to tell her that the last thing an injured player like that needs is a group of people running towards them as other people who are trained to handle those situations are trying to get to them.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:32 AM
1

My guess is that there is a "Queen Bee" in the PTA and the ones that do not like him are her drones. Sounds like your friend is just standing in her way for power of the PTA.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:18 AM
1

Get both sides to put in for down payment.. Easier on couple in their life ahead with lower monthly payments. But I guess some people just need to have that $20k wedding.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:02 PM
13

Big money weddings make no financial sense to begin with. That money can be used to start paying for a lot of things new couples normally need. If parents are paying for the wedding, I would prefer using that money on a down payment for s house. A one time ceremony doesn't make sense when it could go for something that lasts longer. Though some people just love those type of social gatherings.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:32 PM
5

"Any relationship" I believe t that would include marriage as it is a common stage in relationships.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 05:21 PM
36

More money = larger and more extravagant wedding.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:07 PM
43

Unfortunately, men have stiffer penalties fit ending relationships at certain stages, even with no kids involved.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 04:05 PM
2

Though, men and women both can retire at the same age and get the same amount of benefits and since women live longer, they receive more money in retirement and often they can also receive money from their husband's retirement plan as well after he dies. I don't think they count retirement monies.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 08:12 AM
9

It isn't. It's quite the opposite actually. It's a ding on a guy going after a much younger, yet legal woman. 16+9 = 25. It's more calling Clooney a creep for going after 18-25 year olds as a 51 year old.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:03 AM
5

If you want to run the stereotype game, females have it easier. Females are encouraged to go against their stereotypical behavior whereas males get bashed if they do anything that isn't mannish, if they don't earn enough money to support a woman, if they make less than a woman, and they are looked down upon if they choose to be a stay at home dad. If a woman decides to choose a career path of an engineer, people look at that as a good thing and many people and group encourage them, though it buc…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 10:54 AM
2

Some Women's restrooms actually do have a flowery scent to them. A lot of their products have these scents along with the ungodly amount of perfume some women wear. But I think they are f forgetting that they are only masking the more horrendous smells.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 08:08 AM
1

You do have a slight point, however playing soldiers and guns is typically a boy behavior. Sure some girls may partake in this activity, however this is just how a lot of boys have played through the years and continue to play. Girls typically choose different method to exercise their imagination, though it does not exclude them from playing "cowboys and Indians" like boys. This rule will mostly effect boys because boys are more likely to imagine being the hero or a gun fighter based on role the…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 09:34 AM
4

Why does the character by look like Hitler?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 08:27 PM
2

"Millenial moms parents like to have their children have a broader range of flavors and tastes in their diet," she says.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:23 PM
3

It is on r/wtf right here They used a different article.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 08:02 PM
2

Yes that did come from the father, but it does not seem like he is really labeling his son a predator, but others are and he's going along with, thusly labeling his son a predator.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 07:52 PM
18

Such ignorance. I understand we don't currently have an active draft right now, however men are required to register for it if it were ever to become active or else.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 10:06 AM
30

I had to resubmit. I thought the father was calling him a predator, but it appears others might be and he is now having trouble finding a new preschool for his son because he is being labeled as a predator even though he's only a victim along with the other children from that preschool that closed down shortly afterwards.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 09:46 AM
5

A picture of a gun is offensive? They would just institute a policy that only solid colors can be used as backgrounds as any picture can be found offensive to someone.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 01:47 AM
8

Teachers of classes as early as kindergarten factor good behavior into grades I do not like this one bit. Nothing like a grade that can be subjective. What constitutes good behavior? As long as they are not being overly disruptive, behavior should not be part of the grading procedure as it is overly subjective. If the student is overly disruptive, there are other issues and should not be graded on that. If the student is learning and passing the course material, it should not matter on how still…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:39 PM
36

Since when are not men taught not to rape? We are taught throughout life that rape is bad and we shouldn't rape others. Just like we are taught we shouldn't kill, steal, etc.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:36 AM
2

My husband was putting on one big fat act while we were “courting” before marriage. But because he didn’t have to bother he practically dropped the act as soon as the ring was on my finger. Welcome to the Real World. This happens in relationships. Men don't have to try as hard anymore and women don't have to try as hard either. I'm sure she has changed a lot after marriage as well, it's just that she doesn't notice it. It's part of the classic "mating" ritual. After the coupling, it's equal most…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:10 AM
2

Damn autocorrect.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:48 AM
4

No. Just no. I do not support this. It is bad when they do it, it is bad when we do it. Sinking to their level does nothing. Though the social experiment aspect of it would be nice, though it would have to be in the same medium. Plus anonymous reviews = worthless.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:39 AM
1

If you are going to make an app like this, at least make it for both genders. But I think we are better without this possible libelous app.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:30 AM
2

If you want to create an app for men, it's better to make one for men and women. You'd have the more popular app as you are not ignoring half of the population and would hopefully crush LuLu into obscureland. But better yet, not deal with either app and base relationships on "reviews" that any anonymous person can write or rate. And dealing with relationships, no one thinks clearly after a break-up and will do a lot of horrible things to "seek revenge" for some wrong doing they perceive the othe…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:28 AM
2

That seems like a likely scenario as well.. Wife wants to watch something else or go somewhere. She starts nagging and he declines. She starts shoving him, still doesn't budge.. she hits him over and over again then he defends himself and I think you know where this could go. *Disclaimer: I'm not saying this actually happens nor stating that there is an increase of DV reports on Super Bowl Sunday.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:20 AM
2

I'm guessing some of the incidents are from their team scoring a TD and then they jump up in joy and accidentally hitting their partner in the eye.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:18 AM
1

Snopes? Really? I'd trust a national newspaper over some conspriacy theory website. /s
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:16 AM
3

I wouldn't date a single mother when I was younger because I didn't like the idea of it. It is baggage that I did not want to deal with. Of course, there are men that think differently and that's good for them if they choose. Though, I would have made one exception to that rule, but that relationship never got anywhere. But I didn't hate kids. I liked the idea of having kids, but I didn't want someone else's kid, but my own from the start. And I would have babysat other people's kids if someone …
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:11 AM
2

If they do, they get in trouble, jailed, and then forced to register as a sex offender.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:55 AM
2

But did he do so by choice or by being shamed into it? I'm guessing by his actions, it was by choice. But the "bad" interpretation of this sentence is ruled by the rule of assumption by omission. It is stated that you do not raise your kids, that you are a boy and if you raise someone else's you are a man. The assumption by omission part is that the third part which is assumed is that "You are a boy if you do not raise someone else's children." since it is closer to part A than part B.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:54 AM
1

That middle one can go either way. But it could be a subtle way to "indoctrinate" people. That is if assume by omission by assuming that it also means that you are a boy if you do not raise someone else's children.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:51 AM
1

But in the end, it still isn't their children and they should not be forced or shamed into being responsible or involved with them. Yes, the single parent might be a single parent from whatever reason, however, that doesn't mean they don't face hurdles in dating. No one is obligated to date them and people can choose to filter them out if they want. It's not exactly a good thing to force something that you are not comfortable with. Sure there are men/women who are comfortable with dating a singl…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:45 AM
4

Why should a woman not pass you over because you have children? Of course, no one wants to get passed over because of their past, however it doesn't mean they cannot make their own decision and not date a single father. It was not their choice for you to have children, but your own(hopefully). They have the choice to pass you over based off of that just as much as they can pass you over for being too tall, too short, not handsome enough, personality does not match and so on. People should not be…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:40 AM
1

Bad quote and people will take it out of context and use the "rule of assumptions by omission" which is basically stated that a person will assume something it true or false based on the omission of certain criteria. Criteria 1: You refuse to raise your own children. Result 1: You're a boy. Criteria 2: You raise someone else's children Result 2: You're a man. Omitted, Assumed Criteria 3: You refuse to raise someone else's children. Omitted, Assumed Result 3: Since Criteria 3 is similar to Criter…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:33 AM
2

mmm.. I guess this whole debate is boiling down to two different interpretations of the same sentence. Looking at it now, I do see the other interpretation and would agree with what you said. It's just a horrible example to use in this because of the other interpretation. A better way to put it is "A boy won't raise his children, A man will raise his children." The problem with "A boy won't raise his children, A man will raise someone else's children." is the other interpretation which looks to …
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:27 AM
2

But both of your choices and of course it would not work if both sides did not agree to take care of each others children. It would not work if one side was expected to take care of the children if they didn't want to from the start.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:21 AM
4

but you are less of a man if you refuse to date single mums. Women are less of a women who don't shorter men. Women are less of a women who don't date fat men. Women are less of a women who don't date single fathers. No they are not, just as much as men are not lesser men because they will not date single mothers. Taking on a child is a huge responsibility and should be treated as a major decision. You are not only in a relationship with the mother/father but also in the long-term the child. Peo…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:19 AM
2

If you choose to be with someone that has another child from someone else, that is your choice. However, other people shaming you into that choice is horrendous. This is the way I see it. If you choose that, there is no problem, but shaming people because they don't want to, then that is a problem.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:59 AM
2

"You are just being selfish if you don't want to be with a woman who already has a kid. Why do you hate kids?" No, they might love kids and would love to have one of their own someday, but if they are not bringing any extra baggages with legs, they shouldn't be expected to accepted someone else's baggages with legs if they choose not to.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:56 AM
1

I think men are less picky but if they show that they are on some fashion, it is a bad thing or they will find some way to make it look even worse by using assumptions.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 05:29 PM
3

People reject others for their own personal reasons. The problem is that people claim it is insensitive for men to care about what their preferences are and if it's really restrictive, like liking a particular description then they have some weird fetish. Whereas with women, most cases they can be picky and no one cares. Then, most people act as if only women are objectified by how they look or what they possess besides their personality. Men face being objectified as well, but in different fash…
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:19 AM
8

She accidentally shot him. huh? what? really? You don't pull out a gun on someone and somehow "accidentally" shoot them. Even if they fought over the gun, this was no accident.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 07:54 AM
1

I do agree as it's more of the problem of being allowed to claim insanity over a crime like this Though, I do wonder how easy it would be for a man to claim insanity if he did the same thing.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:42 AM
2

Simple solution for hairdressers is to charge by time taken to cut the hair.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:00 AM
24

"We believe in free speech as long as we agree with it."
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:53 AM
4

I think we can assume what the reaction will be. I'm assuming that the women would want input to what goes in there and still be allowed to go in there as well. Otherwise, they will most likely call it sexist and prone to a violent culture and such. But that is only an assumption until someone tries to do so, but then take a look how they reacted when a group in some college wanted to start a men's center.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:38 PM
6

..and is not deserving to be expressed. that tweet is full of irony considering that what @arun smith was stating was an opinion by itself.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:54 PM
1

From one article: In 2008, single, childless women between ages 22 and 30 were earning more than their male counterparts in most U.S. cities, with incomes that were 8% greater on average, according to an analysis of Census Bureau data released Wednesday by Reach Advisors, a consumer-research firm in Slingerlands, N.Y. link Of course, that article still tries to claim there is a wage gap based on discrimination by trying to say that men with bachelors earn more than women with bachelors, that use…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 10:37 AM
2

You need to also realize certain job sectors were more devastated by the recession. Construction was one of them, since there was less construction projects. Construction is a job that most women don't look at while job seeking and is thusly dominated by men. Can anyone name a female job sector that was devastated by the recession anywhere close to how bad construction was hit?
/r/MensRights23/01/13 10:14 AM
11

He wanted to be President sooner.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:41 AM
10

I'm waiting for the day when they ask everyone even if you are at the hospital for something unrelated. My wife was asked at the hospital when she was there to deliver our second child.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 05:28 PM
3

This is completely unreadable and if he wants to know what he can do, he could post his story on here instead of having some FB conversation posted about it. Hopefully, he will learn how to put his words in a more readable version that people can comprehend.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 08:52 AM
5

Where is the big media uproar like this case?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 06:43 PM
6

Disturbing? No. Scary? yes. I am a guy and I have fear walking alone at night with someone following behind. But I normally just step aside and let them pass if they are walking faster so at least if they do attack, I'd be more prepared for it.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:58 AM
3

How do you act accordingly without changing behavior as the simple behavior of walking behind and eventually passing them is the behavior being questioned?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:56 AM
9

"Excus me! Excuse me miss! Please slow down! Slow the hell down!...I only want to pass you."
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:54 AM
3

I'm guessing that is one of the safer things to do. Step to the side and let them pass as you watch them pass. IF they were to attack you, they wouldn't have the advantage of coming from behind in surprise when you'd be more likely to panic.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:53 AM
3

I think you need to reread that more carefully.. "don't approach said girl as silent as a shadow."
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:51 AM
1

There is a big difference with giving respect as opposed to being disrespectful. What this ad is saying that Men are supposed to respect women just because they are women. I agree that men shouldn't be disrespectful to women, but then people shouldn't be disrespectful to any other person regardless of the other person's gender.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 10:32 AM
1

Fuck this mentality. Respect is to be earned not given. I will give women respect when earned, however I cannot respect a women just because she happens to be a woman. I certainly don't expect respect without earning it.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 10:30 AM
2

Well there has to be methods and principles that can be used to "solve" any particular social injustice. Pretty much grading could be based on how well they utilize them to solve their particular cause and how well they state it. Not exactly grade it by how they feel, but rather the methods they use and how well they are able to explain their ideas. But then again, you might be right to which it shouldn't be a school course.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:55 AM
2

A school class on social justice is not really indoctrination, unless it tells the group what to think or steers it's focus on a particular cause. It should not be about a particular cause, but teach about the concept of social justice without dealing with any particular cause in general. And they should be graded on the principals of advancing social justices as opposed to advancing a particular cause.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:21 AM
3

That is just sickening really and anything should not be gender focused. If a group of kids want to do a project on domestic violence against women, that is fine, but that also means that a group of kids should be able to do a project on domestic violence against men as well. But if they really want to focus on a subject that is more frequent and even more deadlier, than they should be focusing on violence by men against men. Did you notice they left that one out but included women against women…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:18 AM
2

I'm going to hate having to tell my sons and any other possible children I may have to not trust everything taught in school and learn the ability to take the information and form their own opinions. There is too much crap that schools are feeding our children that should not part of the education system.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:11 AM
2

I don't because people will only look at the infographic portion and stop there and think that women are being harmed in some way, which in fact they aren't because someone is pulling a "let's switch around the genders argument." TL;DR: People are too lazy to read text on a poster.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 07:00 PM
3

I didn't even realize the suicide one was a gender switching one. I saw the image preview and I assumed it was just a piece of misinformation being spread around and I decided to move on along because I didn't want to look forward at that piece.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 06:59 PM
4

My parents taught me nothing on this really. I was picked on throughout my school years. It got to a point, especially when someone started to physically touch me, not hit, but touch and poke at me that I eventually snapped and punched the guy in the face. He was probably lucky I pulled back some as I noticed my fist heading towards his face, but it still was enough force that he ended up with a black eye. That pretty much ended it after word got around. No teacher saw me at the time and that wa…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 04:32 AM
1

What language was that?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 04:20 AM
2

I don't know what branch of military but a former coworker went back into the military even though she was a single mother. Though she was booted out when she got pregnant again. Op needs to check over again with maybe someone else.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 02:27 AM
1

I'm for kittens. They are delicious.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:12 AM
1

or the act of only wanting to adopt female children.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:11 AM
1

You shouldn't make it a link.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:00 AM
9

So basically, women are weak or just think what ever they edit should never be questioned. I don't know how women survive in this world as most professions have some sort of conflict.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:09 PM
2

Bizarre case, but keep in mind that it can be retried. The drunk factor could probably be the reason this guy can find himself back in prison.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:16 AM
1

A sober person should really be able to determine if the person is their SO, unless they are drunk, which in that case it becomes rape for a completely different reason. Seems like this law is unneeded.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:15 AM
1

Do you have the text of the law change? This article states it is protects both men and women. Assembly Member Katcho Achadjian (R-San Luis Obispo) today joined Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez (D-Los Angeles) in introducing bipartisan legislation to close an archaic loophole in state law and expand the definition of rape to include cases where a perpetrator deceives a victim into sexual activity by impersonating the person's boyfriend or girlfriend. or at least protect against someone pretending …
/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:07 AM
3

My wife has only met my step-mom, but always asks me why I don't talk to my real mother. I get lost for words as I really don't want to explain it to her and would rather move on beyond it.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 09:56 AM
1

The full beard makes a difference.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 09:17 AM
3

you can study engineering, and not be a minority in all of your classes That one irks me. Being a woman in engineering is often deemed as the woman is bright and smart and loves a challenge and a pathfinder. If a man goes to nursing school, he's made fun of and insulted. Look at Meet the Parents movies. That was a big joke in that movie "You're a male nurse?" lol hehehe. edit: also in Yes Man to a lesser extent. The male nurse who bought a motorcycle. Though, that did hit a little bit on the iss…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 08:55 AM
2

Having a different opinion to the teacher in those types of classes typically are considered rude and disruptive, even if you are being respectful and far from being rude and disruptive.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 10:17 PM
3

They didn't plan for this outcome. They panicked and probably spilled the beans to make sure the person who hired them received some of the legal troubles as well.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:30 PM
2

I think they expected that the husband wouldn't put up a fight and would be an easy mark by what the wife probably told them. After all, many people will cower at the sight of the gun in the first place.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:28 PM
3

I find it more effective to use the pocket sand first, then the knife.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:27 PM
3

How is that seriously rape culture? Going home to watch a movie leads rape? Sounds to me that it was insinuating that sex was expected not that it would lead to rape. People read too much into a lot of things.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:03 PM
1

You can make a graph say anything and people will believe it because it is a graph.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:30 PM
2

2012-2010=2 18-2=16 So that would mean relationship started when he was 14? She was arrested February 2012. Huffpo article is old about her arrest. New article is current about her sentence. We just started 2013.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:27 PM
3

As a male victim of domestic violence, it's easier to tell someone to leave than it is for the victim to leave. You have in your mind that you caused it by some action of your own accord. You get in your head that you are worthless. Often you feel things will get better if you let the other person have time to change and that toy can help them change. I was able to get out of that relationship with the help of my car being repossessed and being forced to live closer to work. My ex gf at the time…
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:10 PM
1

Men are also more driven to making money to be seen as a good provider and line up possible dates. Women do not have that pressure. Personally I never cared to make money to catch the eye of a woman, but I realize that pressure is out there.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:05 PM
1

In all fairness, I move away from people and become more cautious around anyone entering an enclosed, tight area. I don't know them. I don't know their mental health. I don't know their intentions.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:37 PM
6

That California judge thing is a gross misinformation right there and it wasn't the judge saying it but rather state law and the judge allowed for a retrial and not a full out acquittal. It wasn't even saying that unmarried women cannot be raped, but rather in a very rare and uncommon way where someone pretends to be someone else (their partner) in order to have sec with them. What happened in that case was a man pretended to bed a woman, the woman thought he was her boyfriend and went along thi…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 06:16 PM
1

Ego. It is bad enough that his ego is being degraded by being beat but about hut to his ego when someone has to step up for him.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 02:23 AM
1

I'm guessing because the man getting the spiked drink will still back the woman without listening or believing the whole story.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 02:21 AM
1

Telling people to not rape that were not going to rape does nothing. Rapists do not take because they were not told not too buy rather because they are rapists. Throughout life most people understand rape is bad. Some people just don't follow the laws.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 01:25 AM
2

The Perception of accident and how the accident actually happened are two separate entities. If a woman "accidentally" hits a man, it would be perceived more likely as an accident than if a man did so. If a man accidentally a woman, it would be perceived more likely as an attack than if a woman did so. A woman might actually run into a door by complete accident and she might say that she did, but yet if she were to go to the hospital with her husband, they will think differently as they would ha…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 09:59 AM
8

Women on men violence is more accepted in society. Sorry if I am assuming you are a woman if you aren't. If a man does that to a woman, he has more to risk than a simple apology. He could get arrested or simply labeled as a woman beater no matter what the reason was.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 12:18 AM
18

Genders reversed then management would have most likely took care of it.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 12:15 AM
1

The mental health of a Mass/spree murderer != The mental health of an individual murderer. Just as well.. Talking about the the mental health of a Mass/spree murderer != Talking about the mental health of an individual murderer.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:18 PM
-1

I wasn't talking about the sole incident of the girl in India, but as a whole that is the trend over there. It's small girl here, small girl there. The girl in India is a bigger story, sure. But there have been many more little stories here and there on that sub that are tiny stories.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 08:33 AM
1

That's bad advice. If every man who got hit first by a woman hit them back, there would be a lot more men in jail and women would have more reason to hit in the first place. You simply cannot hit back because you will be the one arrested if there is no camera or witnesses. Some women know that already and do try to egg men on to hit them back. My ex-gf tried to do that many times while saying "real men hit back." "All my other exes did, so you should to."
/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:41 AM
–

I do as well, but the outcry will probably be more against the prostitute one where the other one people will just agree with them as "he deserves it."
/r/MensRights29/12/12 02:58 AM
–

I had to unsubscribe from that sub. Too much crap going on. There had to be a couple of stories where some girl in some third world country getting beat. I really don't see that as world news as it's really a small incident and there were never any stories about little boys getting beat as if they are not getting beat to death anywhere in the world. But either way, it is extremely small local news.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 02:55 AM
14

I cleaned my room whenever I expected any form of guest.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 02:48 AM
4

Sex with a drunk woman is rape now regardless on how drunk you are or even how drunk she is. It is one thing if she/he was completely black out drunk but different when they are slightly above buzzed drunk. But when someone says drunken sex, it is assumed nowadays that if the woman was drunk that is was drunk regardless of her level of drunkenness.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:35 AM
1

They are not viewed as being a cheapskate for not paying for dinner or only offering to pay half, in fact if they offer to pay half, they are celebrated. If a woman earns less than her SO, she's being discriminated against somehow. If a man earns less than his SO, he's a lazy bum of a freeloader.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:29 AM
2

Those people are being held hostage by their own fear. The same goes for those who want to arm teachers or hire armed guards at schools. People are over reacting to a very isolated, yet hugely horrific incident. The bigger problem are the gun deaths that happen everyday that never get attention until a larger, yet rarer incident occurs.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:17 AM
2

I've got copies of keys made when the original had "Do not copy" on them, so I can confirm that it means nothing.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 02:30 AM
7

I imagine that the mother will say that daddy doesn't want to see him on Christmas. But I could be wrong.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 09:29 AM
1

somehow I missed the heading.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:37 PM
1

..only the bottom half. The top half is actually good as it is fair between both male and females.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 10:50 AM
1

"most promoted" You know there are times this sub is promoted as an insult, which ironically brings that stat up, probably with the other stats.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 08:53 AM
2

Though, they are using religion as an excuse.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 08:50 AM
1

If you are already targeting female customers, have great women working in your company, and are seeing strong commerce and social network effects, congratulations. You are likely trying to figure out how to handle hypergrowth right now. Plus your office probably smells pretty good. Something doesn't sound right in that paragraph. Hiring 'great' women that perform strong commerce and network efforts, does not equate to strong growth or success, and it's forgetting that a man can do that job as w…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 08:29 AM
2

Girls become women when they don't place qualifiers on what they consider a man.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 03:23 AM
1

I have no problem if the biological father doesn't get notice as long as he isn't required to pay later on about the secret. If she wishes to keep it a secret then there is no debt occurred during the secret as she is accepting financial and personal responsibility for the child. But once she decides to reveal the secret, the father gets his rights to see the kid. But that is my opinion.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 03:21 AM
2

And those doctors probably got hog tied and stoned as people shouted "her body, her choice."
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:44 AM
3

Seems like they are simplifying a complex problem. Apparently, it's only the husband's problem when the wife makes more and never the wife's problem when she wonders why her husband is a deadbeat for not making more. Not to mention, that these women and men do get the choice of deciding who works more or not. Perhaps the woman decides that she'd rather stay home than work, even though she could make more money than her husband. Maybe the husband agrees with that. It is a complex issue and it sou…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:39 PM
4

This is not blaming women. This is blaming a woman. Just like blaming Adam Lanza is not blaming men, but a man.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:54 PM
3

I wouldn't even call it boys will be boys but football is king just as in the Penn State fiasco. If the accusations are true, then those involved should be treated accordingly. But that is to be saved for trial. Now it's just lynch mob vs lynch mob.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:07 AM
1

Supposedly, he did have good aim. It's just that there are so few men teaching in elementary schools. I saw news reports giving the tally in terms of gender shot and I knew the reason in the first place. The gender of those shot had nothing to do with why the were shot and it's worthless to bring up when we should be focusing on those who lost their lives especially the children. This guy was just hell bent on shooting and killing everyone in that school.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:00 AM
10

Johnthereader was suggesting that the boys should form their own league then they wouldn't need to play on girl's teams, however if this is talking about HS/College, then supposedly under Title IX that sport would need to replace something or another girl's sport would need to be created to satisfy it. It's not as easy as saying "We have enough boys to start a boy's field hockey team." as you'd be competing against Title IX for the right for that boy's sport to exist.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:36 AM
4

If it's a HS/College sport, then they'd have to either cut a man/boy sport or add a woman/girl sport under Title IX. Though if you are talking about pick-up games or private games, there would be no requirement.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:33 AM
0

So what male sport would be eliminated to make room for that?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:43 AM
2

I had a feeling there was more to the story. I knew it was more than him just saying "rape is bad."
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:11 PM
3

There are plenty of people out there that hate guns so much, that they DO want them all banned and they normally come out of the woodwork during these events. When they say gun control, they do mean ban all guns. Of course, there are other people who do say gun control to not mean ban all guns, but these events do bring out the others who do want to ban all guns from everyone, and frankly the gun control(making it harder without banning) will not fix the problem to begin with as those really int…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:20 PM
3

So what exactly did he say when he said "rape is bad" on a tv show?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:06 PM
2

The New York Post recently cited the study in a story titled, "Nobody marries their best sex ever." ...based on a study that only asks women the question.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 06:59 PM
3

There's always calls for gun control after these types of shooting. Look what happened after that Chief player killed his gf and them himself. "If he didn't have a gun, this wouldn't have happened. Gun Control ALWAYS comes up afterwards which is normally a thinly veiled way of saying, ;ets ban guns from everyone.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 06:50 PM
20

I didn't ask for your opinion that was different than mine.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:30 AM
1

They are simply trying to discredit the MRAs by claiming that they are fighting for the same stuff. If that is the case, then what is the big problem they have with MRAs? Why won't they work together and find a solution. If only that simple, but it's not because it looks like they only are deceiving people into their camp by thinking they are fighting for equality when they are only fighting for a bigger slice of the pie.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:19 AM
2

Offending someone should not be illegal. Seriously, what is this crap? Being 'offended' is highly subjective as well. "They said something! I'm offended!" So you don't talk to people. "They didn't want to say a word to me! I'm offended!" But then maybe I've spent too much time on the internet when I see people getting offended when someone uses the term 'legos' for 'Lego bricks.'
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:01 PM
5

I think what might have pushed the harsher sentence was it seemed that she was the leader. The one who was swinging punches and then she jumped across the counter first. But 10 days of community service does seem light, but from what I see, her case was more of trespass and assault and not trespass, assault and battery as in the other case.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 06:38 PM
10

..and the fear of looking as if they are women haters. "We'd like to politely ask all man to leave." Applaud , cheer, applaud cheer. "We are a mob." applaud cheer applaud cheer. Basically it sets up a situation where if you don't get up and leave, you will be booed and harassed until you do actually leave. This 'polite" invitation ends up being more than just that. But now I can see her evil plan from the start. Have a feminist movie showing. Invite everyone, kick out the men, then blame men whe…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:12 PM
1

No... Her bf's attacker is the victim because society caused her to do bad things to her now-bf by telling her that she had to do so to become more of a woman. So, yes she is making her bf's attacker into a victim.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:18 AM
10

...by the same people who don't like you when you open up. I've had people made at me when I didn't open up to them and then they'd go on a tirade of how I was a weak man for not being able to handle all by myself.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:54 AM
-2

..because her points were said and she didn't want to hear the other side. Here's my points. I'm bored, lets talk about something else.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:31 AM
2

I didn't think that video was that bad and it looked more as if it was showing that women do check out men if the men are showing something to be seen. However, this video is horrendous. It is trying to sell some "penis enlargement pill."
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:15 AM
2

I'm guessing she won't marry him though, live together and still collect her alimony.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 07:34 PM
2

I don't think anyone is disregarding the impact of the family in war times. But Hillary's quote disregards those of men and the civilians(men, women, and children) that are primarily killed or maimed in war. All other family affects of war are secondary ways of being a victim as you are not primarily being the person killed or maimed. Remember this quote in 2016.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:40 AM
4

They'll probably say "crew working"
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:16 PM
-3

The problem is that if the judge did that, people will clamor that those women have the right to reproduce and taking that away is taking away their human rights. Personally, if women want to sleep with him unprotected, then it's both parties fault. Both parties need to learn to live with the consequences. I mean if a rich man has sex with a woman and impregnates her, then he needs to learn that the consequences are that he is going to pay a lot of that money to a woman for the child. If a woman…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:38 AM
6

He's male and talking about Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:28 AM
3

One that stood out to me was "because a woman gave birth to me." So? That means nothing. Was the woman who gave birth to you a good mother or even a mother to you? It's a bad assumption that all mothers are great and deserve respect. A woman giving birth to me means as much as a man providing the sperm to create me. It means nothing except for the how I came into this world. That doesn't deserve automatic respect, it is how they raise and treat you that determines the amount of respect that shou…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:41 AM
17

I need men's rights because... I want to be friends with women without being thought as a rapist that only wants to get in their pants. /bad parody
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:33 AM
2

Some people will still stick their tongue in the light socket even after being told not to.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:11 AM
1

Men's rights and feminism can coexist and compliment each other. However, they are bound to clash when the reaction to fix a problem on one side creates a problem in the other.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 04:57 AM
1

It's the broken social contract that has killed chilvary.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 04:49 AM
1

The whole "I'm less privileged than you." argument is a silly argument anyways. It does not matter who is more privileged than the other. What matters is how is one being treated solely based on what is between their legs. If one is being treated poorly because they happen to be {insert gender here} than it's bad regardless is {insert gender here} is more privileged than the other. I find it to be a thinly veiled attempt to justify the taking away of the rights of one group to give the other sid…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:09 AM
1

Their husbands forced them to. /s
/r/MensRights26/11/12 07:00 AM
5

Except that you were yelling at a stupid person. Stupid does not know gender.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 06:59 AM
1

I actually agree that we shouldn't use the term "crazy", we should use abusive, manipulative, etc.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:45 AM
1

The problem is that many people have yet to realize that the pendulum has swung so far into the favor of women over men in many areas. Not to mention that many people think that not having the government pay for women's birth control choices is trying to prevent them from getting it and they think that it's an attack on women when in most cases it's just people saying that they should be responsible for their own birth control choices. It's about perception and the lack of understanding about MR…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 05:29 PM
2

...and feel that I am getting dirty looks abd being considered a creep from women who think I'm only there to check them out.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 03:51 AM
1

For new fathers living in California, you get 6(5) weeks paid leave. I think they don't pay you for first week like disability insurance. I took it for my second son and got a lot of bonding time with both of my sons.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 02:26 AM
1

I agree in principle, however principles mean little when they are stacked against the actual results in reality. Education shouldn't be targeted to one sex/gender over others.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 03:19 AM
8

Being 18 = legally adult, whether or not they act as one is completely a different matter.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:14 PM
1

* 19 year old.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:11 PM
4

And she holds a high position of power of a group involved with students of both men and women. I wonder how many programs she champions that are only for women and how much she ignores programs for men or even allow men to take part in. Anyone from University of Toronto care to provide some info on that?
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:27 AM
1

Of course women are most affected by slut shaming. That itself is a load of crapola. Men are slut shamed all the same just in different ways. Being a 'playa" "player" is the same thing for men. Being a "playa" does not have a positive connotation in a lot of uses of the term. Look at the phrase "men only think about sex" or "Men need to stop thinking with their brains between the legs" or "Men think about sex every 6 seconds." That is all slut shaming. Even, when a lot of people start talking ab…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 06:42 PM
1

I think we need to start questioning schools on the content of what they are teaching our children. I don't want my sons to be taught that they cannot be abused or that they are automatically the aggressor just as much as they should not be the aggressor. And if I had a daughter, I wouldn't want her to grow up to fear all men and also be taught that she should not be an abuser. But I guess we need to talk to our children to go along with what they learn in school and let them know that not every…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 06:45 PM
1

I'd rather be afraid of a woman, who can damage your life in many different ways than being afraid of a simple cockroach that one can easily step on and kill with no ramifications. But such a silly image anyways and is a slight joke on the 'circle of life' that has no basis on how the majority of people feel but rather silly stereotypes.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 07:13 PM
1

I can barely grow a mustache and I'm 34.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 06:21 PM
2

Looks like the woman are winning with less casualties. /s
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:03 AM
21

So is someone texting and donating money to the Red Cross on your phone without your consent, even if you hand them your phone. They are making a donation with your money, hence stealing it. Taking the phone just adds another layer.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 08:41 AM
1

Free drinks need to stop. Guys need to stop paying for drinks unless they get something else in return. And I'm not saying it is sex but rather a good conversation without the expectation of a free drink.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 08:05 AM
2

To be fair, men steal from cosmetics as well though not as much.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:25 AM
1

next time, I'm thinking about just calling the police to report an abandoned child in the middle of a department store. But really, I'll just leave them alone and assume the parents are close by.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:42 AM
7

Looks like they are giving her and her family assistance though and saying that she shouldn't be punished but can be redeemed for this. She should be punished. She made a false report and wasted the community's time and money and created fear in a story that never existed. Would be a good case to put up as an example for others as there was no actual rape victim because it never occurred in the first place or anywhere close to be.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:43 PM
2

You are also operating on the assumption that just because a parent stays in the picture that they actually care about the child.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 08:43 AM
4

...and the people who game the system.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 08:37 AM
1

If it was just the picture then I might agree that it was only a joke. But when it evolves into a man-bashing fest, it becomes a little leas of a joke but still kind of a joke. When it comes to a point of name calling and telling someone to basically to stfu, it is no longer a joke.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:42 AM
3

My bus system requires strollers to be folded up prior to entry onto the bus.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 04:58 PM
1

I still like the other one better.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 04:55 PM
2

My wife worked as a caregiver until 2 weeks prior to giving birth at 2 jobs.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 04:54 PM
2

I think you are experiencing a technical glitch with the software. Not really a Men's Right issue as the other images you shown also point to that.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 08:54 AM
2

Different people respond to different diseases differently and sometimes even different under similar diseases. Furthermore, some days can even be better than other days even within the same disease. This is complete BS because a) I've worked while having the flu before and b) I've also had a flu that incapacitated me to the point where I could barely move my arms or legs at all. Heck, I even went to work when I should have went to the hospital with very low blood pressure and bouts of dizziness…
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:05 AM
1

In my experience, leaving is hard. Recognizing that it was abuse might be easy. Knowing that you don't have to take it might be easy. Overcoming the fear that there will be hell to pay if you try to leave is hard especially when you fear that people will only believe her word if you try to speak up against it and that she could easily place you in trouble whenever she wanted to by coming up with some story to the police. It's never so black and white and different situations are different. If I …
/r/MensRights29/10/12 07:00 AM
2

California, you can also get paid leave(from the state) for bonding with child for fathers. I got 6 weeks.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:19 PM
1

It could have been stated as everyone has a voice in the government, but it comes out as pandering when they go on about getting females involved in government in the Middle East. It used to be just about getting democracy into the Middle East. This year it's about just women's rights this and women's rights that and even our foreign policy should dictate women's rights as well.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 06:54 AM
2

I believe Israel has conscription as well but I think females are required to serve as well. Edit: all Israeli citizens are required with a few exceptions. Source
/r/MensRights19/10/12 03:18 AM
1

Until they classify all the closer spots as female only.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 08:28 AM
1

No one ever follows that rule.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:12 PM
5

It can be a rebuttal without having read what you all wrote.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 06:06 AM
6

It won't work because child support is "for" the child.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 02:17 PM
2

Prostate Cancer is a light blue, not brown. Brown is the color people joke that the color is when it's about Prostrate Cancer, referring to the method on how doctors check for prostate cancer.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 07:32 AM
13

Some of the cosmo theft is also OCR(Organized Crime Rings) who go store to store and steal cosmo items to sell them to people for a small portion of their worth which ends up going for sale at swap meets, online retail methods, etc. Some of these members that steal cosmo items are male, just as much as they are also female.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 10:12 PM
3

Petty things like this add up. Combine this with other petty things and you start wondering where exactly is this privilege for being male is located. The privilege in this case is that males get the privilege to do hard labor while females get to sit around and chat amongst themselves.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:36 PM
3

The other person doesn't have the choice to back out? Why should he feel obligated to not go through with it? I'm sure that that idea probably did pop up in his head. She may have even argued against it to begin with. But that is just conjecture as we don't know the whole story. But lets put the story on the other shoe like you tried to do later. Would a woman be obligated to back out if she got horribly disfigured and would the guy not look bad and creepish for backing out? I'm guessing most pe…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:29 PM
1

How much more awareness does Breast Cancer even need? Personally, I am getting sick of this "pink" campaign as it is everywhere as if it's the only cancer that matters. Fuck cancer and all, but perhaps we should start focusing on other ones. But this whole NFL doing pink campaign need to stop already, or at least keep it to one week and not the entire month.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:40 AM
1

I believe there's more to the story as she instigated any form of attack on herself as she tried to grab the man's phone that had photos from the night in question. Simply put, if you try to grab someone else's property then you are due for being attacked as you are the attacker in the first place.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:34 AM
6

Keep it cleaner and just say "girls are stupid. Throw rocks at them." It will probably still raise a ruckus.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 06:29 AM
1

but there will be if a woman sued for that? They should get a female friend go in and see if they'd take the case with similar aspects. I'm sure some will take it.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 04:38 AM
2

That's sexist as well. What if it was a guy going into the women's restroom and doing those disgusting things? Same applies for stuff in the men's. A woman can still go in there and mess things up.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 05:13 PM
0

"I apologize to you for being better than you for realizing that no one should feel the need to apologize for being a certain gender."
/r/MensRights17/09/12 04:34 PM
1

I agree for the most part to what you said however there are situations where it's unacceptable. There are situations where it is completely avoidable to have the issue arise. If there is a baby in a R rated movie , then people are correct to be upset. There are a lot of instances where these people should be reprimanded for their behavior. Students go to school to and have the expectations that there will be no baby that will distract them from whats being taught. But if it's a child-rearing cl…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 04:22 PM
2

She is really using that as proof? 5 right away shows why women earn less. Because they choose to work in lesser paying" pink collar" jobs. 10 proves it's about choice as mothers earn 7% less than childless singles. Of course, a mother might work less because they choose to spend more time at home with their kids.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:36 AM
1

I'm a man and it would have been instinct for me to help a child in that situation.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:07 AM
4

Personal Info, probably not allowed to do so.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 06:06 PM
4

...next to an open door that leads outside.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 04:13 AM
10

Women hover as well getting shit and piss all over as well and like the men who piss all over the seat are inconsiderate asshats.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:54 PM
13

My ex-gf tried to instigate getting hit by hitting me and saying real men would hit back and that I was a wuss. It does happen.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:42 PM
1

Now, what if the man was there longer and was able to get more opportunities for raises?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:08 PM
1

The problem is that it won't be reported in the media. or if it is it will not be reported as to why she was being harassed or even worse injured or maimed. They'll find some other reason to say or just say motive was not known and the media will move on to the next story.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:25 PM
1

I think they can argue their club is private considering that you need to pay to get in.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:14 AM
1

Girls get in for free... and get their drinks for free.... I would think the free drinks would be incentive enough. But at least with the free drinks, it's the man's choice if he really wants to pay for a drink for someone else who probably does not even want to talk to him.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:13 AM
1

Except that the mother still has the choice to either give them up for adoption or choose an abortion. That is one thing that I say you are missing in your thought process. If the father of the child leaves, the mother can still choose to do what;s in the best interest of the child, whether it's adoption, abortion or keep it. Whereas, what you appear to be saying is that men have no say in the matter, which in this case it would be flawed because the woman choose to deceive the man into a choice…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:10 AM
3

Well, it would never get that far because that show would be sexist and wouldn't make the light of day anywhere.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:59 AM
2

"You don't do enough for me and never spend enough time with me..." as he comes home from his 60 hour a week job to help support the two of them. -anecdotal story
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:22 PM
3

actually.. I was responding as if this was a response to another one of my comments.. doh! But she could still create a ruckus outside the store by shouting this nonsense and some people could still believe her without knowing all the facts. You know after the fact of being called out for her behaviour and she might feel that the store is not doing enough to "PROTECT THE CHILDRENS!" and in her view is allowing pedophiles and kidnappers to walk around the store unchecked. If she took the "Pedophi…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:26 AM
3

They don't review penalties and there are blind spots within a store's camera system, so you'd be screwed if you are in one of them and not to mention anyone coming to the aid of whom they perceive as the victim.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:11 AM
7

Watch the NFL sometimes. Sometimes the person retaliating is the only thing the ref sees.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:06 AM
4

Yes, because everything said on the internet is a lie. /s Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. So what? Take it with a grain of salt and move on. This happens in a lot of these story threads and not just menrights, but all over. Seriously, I think it needs to stop unless you have definite proof or very good proof that it is indeed a fake and not just some sort of feeling. Can't we just give them the benefit of the doubt here?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:53 AM
2

I wonder how it would look if she grabbed one of the kids hands and started to guide them towards her if he were to pull his daughter's hand away from her and pushed her away from them. I think he'd have every right to do so, though I'm guessing many people will only see him push her away physically and not see or want to believe there was a reason for it.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:45 AM
3

Well it was probably a little harder back then to actually call the cops. But nowadays with everyone carrying a cellphone, they probably will.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:42 AM
5

Probably people who believe every story told online is fake, people who hate MRAs, people who don't know how to operate a computer mouse/trackball/touchpad, or just Reddit being Reddit among many other possibilities.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:40 AM
1

Though, I wonder if those federal officers ask single women as well or even couples. If they are only asking men, that is wrong.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:38 AM
2

I love how people think that the video cameras catch everything and anything in the store. A) There's lots of blindspots. B) If anyone was going to do anything to anyone, they will be taking them into the restroom where there are no cameras and sometimes no cameras pointed at them and furthermore, they wouldn't be taking them into a public area in the first place. If anything, they would be getting out of there ASAP. C) There is no sound in most of these systems.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:25 AM
19

I wonder if the police will even respond.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:23 AM
18

I'm going to have to remember this and if anyone starts asking my kids questions like this I'm going to loudly say. "STEP AWAY FROM MY KIDS NOW AND STOP HARASSING THEM!!" I WILL CALL THE POLICE IF YOU DO NOT." But I think having two boys, I won't get that many issues as it seems to be in these stories, it's always a man and daughter(s). I'm guessing when they say they are protecting children.. it's more "I'm protecting little girls."
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:19 AM
10

Then crazy woman would go crazy spouting how a store is letting pedophile and kidnappers walk around their store unchecked.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:13 AM
6

married men make more money, But have less money as more of their money also goes to someone else without a choice.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 05:32 PM
17

He didn't get sued to pay her $1.5 Million. That was the school district for "not setting up a safe environment that caused her getting raped." So, the taxpayers will never see that money ever again. But she should be forced to do $1.5 million worth of community service, but I think someone would deem that cruel and unusual punishment.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 04:38 PM
1

I think he should be supportive personally, at a distance. I don't think she'll really want to get therapy and actually change if he will not give her incentive to do so. Staying with her gives her incentive to not really change but rather stay the same as she may only feel that she doesn't need to change as he'll stick by her anyways. If he really wants to keep this relationship, he will most likely need to back away from it in order to save any possibility of it succeeding. Otherwise, he'll fa…
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:45 AM
1

Personally, I think you are better off leaving that situation. If she truly needs some therapy, she needs to do it by herself and without you in the picture. If she seeks said therapy and is better, than you can discuss being in a relationship with each other. Don't fall into the line of thinking that you can save her by sticking with her. If she wants to be with you, she should be doing the hard work to be with you and actually change. Until she does that, you should stay away.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 08:08 AM
3

It's not banned in NY. A at-home test is banned as they can only get a test done if it is court or doctor ordered. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_2yvegsUEvcJ8z3GpGwOFuL
/r/MensRights11/08/12 08:28 PM
1

Actually, I think more of these rapists would start to check for the device first.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 07:55 AM
3

The patriarchy has been a red herring for years now. It has lost its true identity and is now only used as an excuse to justify anything and everything that certain feminists believe. Man gets hired over a woman, even if the man was more qualified.. Patriarchy.. More women are going to college nowadays.. Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:14 AM
4

Then they had problems, and eventually split. The courts gave their son to his wife, sole custody, because she made more money. So why don't more men get their children when they make more money than their ex-wife? Seems to me that the court is just making up any phony excuse to justify handing over the kids to the woman instead of just saying "we always give the kids to the woman."
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:08 AM
2

They have the same social biases as everyone else. And you think they couldn't have a bias between a man and a tearful woman on the stand explaining how big of a monster you are? Without any witnesses or harder evidence that you were only using pepperspray as a defensive weapon, you could quite possibly still get screwed in the courts. Pepperspray used as an offensive weapon: http://www2.insidenova.com/news/2012/feb/22/6/woman-charged-biting-pepper-spraying-manassas-man-ar-1705670/ http://abcloc…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:52 PM
3

It still wouldn't stop her from claiming that you sprayed her with pepperspray without provocation first though which is very possible considering that they pepperspray does not have knowledge to whether it is being used in an offensive or defensive manner. While most people view it as a "defensive" weapon, it is just a social construct and I would wonder how they'd view it if a man peppersprayed a woman that was attacking him as I'd guess that if a woman peppersprayed a man, then he had it comi…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:23 PM
4

There really is no such thing as a offensive weapon or a defensive weapon. Any weapon can be used for either offensive or defensive purposes. Some just happen to be more lethal than others. But if I had to defend myself, I'd rather use a less lethal one as well. But I work near a college and it's amazing how many women I see with pepperspray on their keychains. I've yet to see a guy with one.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:09 PM
3

I wonder what the response to that would be.. a) You're a wimp. b) OH MY GOD! He's carrying a weapon!
/r/MensRights20/07/12 06:42 PM
1

Making posters for each side like the ones exampled, the "Men can stop Rape" and the "anti-false rape accusation" is probably a bad way to go about it, Though the "Anti-False Allegation" is a response to the "Men can stop rape" one which basically is calling all man potential rapists, though the anti-false rape allegation does not infer that all rape cases are false, but still possibly a bad way to go about it. But as far as supporting people, yes rape victims should be supported just as well vi…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 06:32 AM
1

Also hard to get accurate statistics of false accusations as well as some are found guilty and others are dismissed with no punishment to the false accusers and some are found not guilty and people still believe they are guilty whether or not they actually did commit the rape or not. It's hard to account for something that gets swept under the rug as "it will hurt women who get raped from coming forward." even though false rape accusations do a worse job at that because no one believes them due …
/r/MensRights20/07/12 04:59 AM
3

Then, it's a bigger complex issue than just a mere poster and to a large part can also find its root into what that poster is fighting against. a) Her friends were a disappointment to her because they didn't support her in her time of need. b) Which could have a indirect cause of being not believed due to the thought that it could have been a false rape accusation and since there is hardly any punishment for it, it gives incentive for people to claim something happened that didn't which ends up …
/r/MensRights20/07/12 04:42 AM
7

you mean 25% more women than men graduating from college as a "great accomplishment." no?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 04:36 AM
1

This is not Men's Right to begin with and I bet the person who made the "joke" has no participation at all in regards to Men's right but just thought it'll be funny "haha!" to make a quip on a wall.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:32 PM
2

They are basically throwing mud and hoping it sticks. If they repeat the mantra, "MRA's are trolls" that people will only see that part of the conversation and forget all the rest of their argument.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:27 PM
5

Did she use a condom? if not, this can turn much uglier down the road.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:08 PM
2

Well to be fair, it does sound like you are making an argument that there is a disparity and it needs to be fixed.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 08:04 PM
15

Sounds like it's more about the choices women make. If they wanted to take a course in a profitable field, then they should study a profitable field rather than taking courses on the Cultural Aspects of Underwater Basket Weaving. There's nothing stopping them as they have the choice to choose what they want to do, and they'd rather take these humanities fields. They have no one to blame but themselves.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 07:54 PM
10

Why don't they do the white dress and buns? Slave Leia has already been done to death.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 07:43 PM
4

Simple question though, can a lawyer lock those funds from you in the middle of a divorce if they felt that your soon-to-be-ex-wife is entitled to it?
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:53 PM
5

I'm sure some of it is that people expect men to man up and get through it and work while trying to do so. They'd be called wimps if they went to the doctors over any minor thing, even if that minor thing was a major thing.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 07:53 AM
-1

Well at least most of the 1% isn't discriminatory on their victims. They don't care if they are male or female just as long as they are able to fleece them of money.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 08:34 PM
1

but a guy who can't beat the cutoff to start doing science at the undergraduate level is a guy who won't be able to get any funding to do science anyways Sounds logical and everything except that you are raising the bar for the men, while lowering the bar for the women. This will result in lower qualified people getting into the program based on gender. If participation in these fields were equal and women desired to be in these fields just as men, then you might have a point but the issue is th…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 08:13 PM
2

Though if you are omitting better candidates just because of their gender, you are weakening the pool of those who study in those fields and you will get less qualified scientists working on less quality scientific activities.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 04:14 PM
2

but but but women are under-represented in STEM areas of study. But then again, could that possibly be due to women not seeking those fields to begin with? So in order to equalize it, they are just telling people who want to study it that they cannot get help.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 04:11 PM
10

More like dismissed by everyone else by stating that "you hate women." if you disagree with it.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 04:08 PM
2

I wonder if they realize that false accusations can do the very same thing when actual rape victims are not believed when you hear a lot of cases about false rape accusations because there is no deterrent to actually file one.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 03:52 PM
9

The problem is that both sexes do indeed objectify the other gender for sexual purposes and they don't want to admit that females do the exact same thing that men do. I have heard plenty of girls and women through my life commenting on how sexy someone's ass was, how handsome they were, how they'd love to bed someone, etc. I don't see why they even have a big problem over it as long as it doesn't go beyond a certain point. So what if a woman wants to show her skin for money? That is her choice a…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:55 AM
36

Most of the women in the film are audience members portrayed as easily manipulated cash cows to be exploited for money. Who would have thought that a person who goes to see a stripper would be a cashcow? This describes exactly what men are considered as well when they see strippers, except that the female strippers are victims for being put on display, even if they are doing it on their own accord to bring in a lot of cash for themselves.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 12:27 AM
4

eh... if that's a joke, It really isn't funny.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 11:43 PM
1

Yes. I'm in a better situation and relationship now. And we're not really in different spectrums. Abuse is Abuse. Even though I may have been physically stronger than my attacker, I was still in a position of weakness that they preyed on. I hope you are in a better situation now.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 07:14 AM
1

On one hand, I know what it's like to be a woman, to feel small and scared (not equating that with all women, but this is my experience), to feel helpless and under control of someone bigger and stronger, to be abused and feel totally ineffectual. I was a victim of domestic abuse as well, but as the man being beat by a woman. It made me feel small and scared to feel helpless and being under control of someone smaller and weaker. It's humiliating to say the least because I couldn't do anything ab…
/r/MensRights30/06/12 07:01 AM
3

Pudding is a girl thing? huh?
/r/MensRights29/06/12 06:26 PM
1

Maybe he did say that he didn't want kids and she thought she could change his mind? The only problem that I can see off hand is if he never told her about his surgery if he knew that she a)wanted children or b) was trying to get pregnant.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:33 AM
2

Of course, they probably did some study that pins a lot of crimes around strip clubs, but fail to realize that strip clubs tend to be in shadier parts of town with more crime in general.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:50 AM
5

The issue is the "buying it" part instead of paying the taxes for it. What we are trying to do is to pay for it by sending money to private insurance companies to insure Americans. So what we are doing is paying a middle man to pay the hospital bills. Of course, there's always the bureaus that need to run it anyways, but what we are relying on is private companies to do it.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:28 AM
2

The problem with living with "Obamacare" is that it would be harder to change because people would get accustomed to it and believe it'd be a waste of time and effort to replace it. But I can understand what you are saying, it's just easier to create something out of nothing than try to fix a broken system.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 07:16 AM
12

The problem with your examples is that with gay marriages you can evolve the law into allowing it along with civil rights. The problem with "obamacare" is that it is based around a horrible base. While there are good portions, but unfortunately they are tied around the horrible base. You only get pre-existing condition coverage because it is tied to the notion that everyone must buy health insurance or else(the Mandate). You remove the mandate, then it pretty much kills a lot of the good parts. …
/r/MensRights28/06/12 06:56 AM
–

You need to scrap the whole thing and start over. Accepting parts of it will only get people to thinking it's ok and they will only think that there's nothing that needs to be fixed because something is already in place. It is a horrible bill with good intentions and needs to die to be reborn in a new form completely.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 06:35 AM
1

so it's plausible that a male teacher could use his position to coerce the girl. Just as it is plausible for a female teacher to use her position to coerce a male student. Also, as plausible as a female student wanting to actually have sex with a male teacher.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 03:23 AM
1

The thousands of post-WWII unmarried women were the silent victims of the war, because they were left without husbands. They never met the men who could have changed their lives. I don't see how that is anti-men. I find that it's a fairly accurate assessment. It's saying that women were silent victims of war, unlike calling them the primary victims of war like Hillary is saying. Now is the victimhood of these silent victims as bad as those men who died on the battlefield? No, but it is only sayi…
/r/MensRights24/06/12 05:57 PM
1

Well what she is saying is crazy and irrational.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 05:49 PM
11

You should report anything girls say that are anti-men, but then again, they probably won't care. They can say "Guys are scum." and it would be fine but if someone wrote "Girls are scum." then it would be reported because it's an attack on females. On the basis that females need to be protected is just another way of saying "females are the weaker sex and need to be protected because of it." But they will not recognize that because it's becoming more about giving women power rather than equality…
/r/MensRights23/06/12 02:09 AM
1

Of course, it was probably more of a forced retirement. It's amazing how most of them suddenly decide to retire.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 01:44 AM
1

That's the way it always works. They are never fired but rather "retire."
/r/MensRights22/06/12 01:42 AM
1

I think a better punishment would be writing "I will accuse people of things without absolute proof." 500x.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:08 AM
1

Guns? Knives? bombs? Crack cocaine? I guess and at best, it should be an administrator or teacher of the same sex. If the kid was a girl and the administer was a man, could you imagine the uproar then?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 07:56 AM
1

I think the bigger story is that a Female school administrator stripsearched the boy. If a male school administer strip-searched a girl, he would be called a pervert and many people would be shouting for him to be fired and thrown into jail for sexual assault.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 07:54 AM
0

I don't think it was ever really set on easy. Men were the breadwinners and the ones risking their lives and getting workplace stress so they could provide for their families or play the dating game of providing their dates with entertainment from said wages. What they received in return was some perks like being guaranteed an opportunity to have a job. Of course, times change and we were changing with it and now everyone is equal in getting jobs as it should be in these new times, however inequ…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 07:46 AM
6

...Like creep shaming if a man wants to become a elementary school teacher.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 07:28 AM
1

As if men are not judged by their looks as well...
/r/MensRights20/06/12 07:11 AM
1

"his/her" -- Why are you sexist against women??? You used the masculine pronoun first!!! <\s>
/r/MensRights19/06/12 05:35 AM
1

She actually got 99 years.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 01:51 AM
2

I wasn't saying eating red meat is unhealthy, The issue lies in that a lot of people consider eating red meat to be unhealthy and will consider "fruit, vegetables and yogurt" to be healthier foods, which is the premise of what they were saying when they said women choose more "healthier foods" which they even qualified into saying that men are more likely to eat pizza and red meat. The problem lies in that they are classifying eating healthy by the mere a "choice group of foods" that they are cl…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:13 PM
4

Well, you do realize people will soon be spouting this stuff verbatim soon, right?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 09:06 AM
1

It's a stacked deck no matter how you look at it. No money for college and an education system that is geared towards women is hard to overcome for men. Though, the system would be easier to face and conquer if you were not also looking down the barrel of how you were going to pay for everything. You can adjust to the system, while it's harder to overcome financial difficulties in relation to education.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:58 AM
2

And they never looked at their respective restrooms either. I think they will find the women's restroom to be messier, though it may smell nicer but I'm guessing that's from all the perfumes that women products carry with them.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:54 AM
3

We graduate college more often. Must be nice to get preferred admittance, have primary/secondary schools geared towards your strengths, have more scholarship opportunities by simply being a woman, and being able to have men expelled by mere accusations. Oh and of course every degree is equally valuable and marketable. A lot of it does come down to finances. Men have less scholarships available, which means they need other sources of money to go to school, which means they also need to work which…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 08:48 AM
2

I hope you don't like M&M's where the "male" M&M's are either nutty dum-dums or just plain jerks and the "female" M&M's are either sexy or smart, intellectuals meeting with other intellectuals(who also happen to be female).
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:35 AM
1

Playa/player/pervert/scumbag/douche the list goes on.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 07:05 AM
3

Because people take that to mean that we are saying a certain act is completely preventable if one takes certain precautions, which is not completely accurate. It's not smart to flash money while walking down any street, but that does not mean someone will not try to rob you if you were carrying the money but were not waving it around.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 06:55 AM
5

I'd have no problem staying quiet about it afterwards and support them. The problem is that you cannot even discuss certain precautions they can take to avoid it because then it's all "victim-blaming" when there is no victim to begin with.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 05:24 AM
2

"Don't blame the victim, blame the attacker." But then again, I always remember telling people how stupid they were when they got their laptop stolen from their car when they left it on the backseat. I don't understand how telling people to learn to be cautious and try to prevent certain things from happening is victim blaming to begin with. Of course, all the precautions in the world will not prevent all cases, but it sure can stop and prevent certain instances. Like if you leave your laptop on…
/r/MensRights04/06/12 04:43 AM
4

Then, lets release all the men in prison for the same crimes out to be rehabilitated as a normal citizen as well.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 05:26 AM
3

"she won't be prosecuted after admitting to a false accusation." apparently, that is not enough proof.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 05:13 AM
2

It'll be more like 3 chicks at the same time with that amount of money.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 05:13 AM
12

forget debtor's prison. She needs to go to prison for the false rape report.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 05:12 AM
4

I think it's because they claimed that the school didn't set up a "safe environment" that allowed her to get "raped."
/r/MensRights01/06/12 05:11 AM
1

The China Adoption rate per gender may be inaccurate. Without knowing how many girls vs boys were available, it may be skewed in this statistic as Chinese couples were more likely to want a boy over a girl under the One-child act that they had going. The Chinese did prefer a male heir as opposed to a female heir. edit: though the article did state that. :) Though the Russian statistic is more telling.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 07:10 PM
2

I was referring to how it would work in practice, which would be mostly women who owe men alimony or even child support. Of course, the argument for child support would be that "it's for the children." And, women on men violence would somehow turn into "I had to beat him because he was going to kill me." Of course, not all cases would end up that way, but in practice it will mostly be women who owe men money benefiting from this.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:24 AM
-1

.. in other words...only women who owe men alimony.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:05 AM
5

Sounds more like an idiot who thinks they can debate without actually defending their position and would rather shut the other side up to win it. If they were talking to a guy, they might use the same verbage or just call them an asshole, idiots, moron and etc.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 11:41 PM
76

Just take the case that should be taken against Wanetta Gibson. She admitted that she falsely accused a guy of rape and they say there is not enough evidence to prosecute her. Video = not enough evidence Confession = not enough evidence
/r/MensRights27/05/12 10:13 PM
9

Googling it and in California, you can be jailed and fined for failure to pay child support.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 06:43 PM
16

My question is why isn't she in jail for not paying child support? Or is that normal procedure to not jail some if they don't pay because of no income or employment?
/r/MensRights26/05/12 06:19 PM
2

"Why is this article solely about men getting used and women are the ones taking advantage? It exists both ways and a lot of these examples aren't very common. For men reading this article, they'll start to lose their trust in women they haven't even met and that's not a good way to start any relationship... Sounds like the author just has a rough dating history and a bit of bitterness/resentment towards women..." Looks at website url.... MadeMan.com mmmm... yeaaaaah... about that comment... It'…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 04:38 AM
1

My ex_gf had a problem when I mentioned that I saw something in her opened purse sitting in the car. " why are you looking in MY bag?" But then again, it was an opened box of condoms that we didn't use together.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:47 PM
2

maybe it was awarded to her, but he has to pay for it.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 06:56 AM
2

I find it funny, but it is inappropriate for the workplace. There's a lot of funny jokes that even females would laugh at that are inappropriate and could get a man fired if they sent it out. If they want to set up these rules, they need to play by the same ones.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:38 AM
2

But while we might laugh at it still, there's a good saying that goes for what I think about these types of things. "What is good for the goose, is good for the gander." You know very darn well if this email had a dig at women at the end, the originator of this email would have been shit-canned faster than they could say they were shit-canned. While we can still laugh at it, it still creates a hostile workplace and is sexist and should be held in the same light as if it were a dig on women.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:36 AM
3

Two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:47 PM
1

One wrong does not make another wrong right. Also, if there was real punishment for false accusations, there would be less false accusations. With less false accusations, actual rape cases would be more believable and you'd have less doubt that could sway people's minds and let actual rapists go free. False allegations hurt both genders and weakens actual rape cases. A) It injures an innocent man/woman's reputation and life and B) makes rape victims(Male/female) feel the blunt of people not beli…
/r/MensRights12/05/12 02:29 AM
1

I wonder if a male would be more assumed to be childless more than a female would be assumed to have a child there regardless the fact if the male was with a kid and the female wasn't.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 02:14 AM
3

You realize that they'll most likely just try to get drinks out of you, right? Though, maybe...just maybe if you are lucky enough, someone will actually give you a fake number.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 07:45 AM
1

So if someone wanted to set up a Men's Club, all they need to do is charge men $1 for entry and charge women $1,000 for entry. But then again, there would be an outrage if any place of business actually did that.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 07:40 AM
7

I have a picture on my phone of my son in a different location than where I am currently at. I think that should help.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 05:59 AM
1

Though, not everyone wants to join a frat and would rather walk into a place that don't don't have to associated with all the time. As a frat member, it implies that you have to be a member of some "special" group. Whereas, a center seems to be more of a place you can go to whenever you feel like and don't have the feeling of being included in some group that you might not want to be in.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 12:51 AM
4

They also want only guys that are feminists. "None of them even stepped foot in a Genders Studies Course."
/r/MensRights05/05/12 12:46 AM
3

It's pure FUD - Fear, uncertainity and doubt.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 12:43 AM
5

I almost want to thank the guy in the middle who said that the center would just be occupied by "douchebags playing video games" Sounds like FUD to me. It seems like they are trying to get people to vote no for it by creating it as a "safehaven" for "douchebags" and not men. What really got me is that they went on about saying that they should consult the women's center and that the people who are "organizing" for it never been in a Gender Studies Course(which I'm assuming is really just women's…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 12:40 AM
3

all the guys I know There's your problem right there. You are setting up your premise with what you know or assume you know. You are saying that you are not affected and people you know are not affected which is just anecdotal evidence based on your feelings and your friends feelings ignoring any other person that might feel affected by this. The bigger picture aspect of this goes beyond what we are discussing in this thread, but the fact that they are discriminating against men by setting an ho…
/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:42 AM
1

What about other guys that don't like the North Weight Room and prefer the other part? Is the North Weight Room just weights are does it include all other exercise equipment as well? Not all men lift weights and if the North Weight Room is only weights, then it is affecting them. Also, if you only use the North Weight Room, it does not affect you at all, but other men might be if they use the other facility.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 11:40 PM
2

Divorce Industry ಠ_ಠ I would love to think that it doesn't really exist, but then I am reminding of it at work where there is a for-free magazine on the "free rack" that is about Divorce.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:46 AM
8

Low ceiling = challenge accepted. Let us see if we can hit the ceiling with piss.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 04:55 AM
7

Here is the commercial in question
/r/MensRights20/04/12 04:46 AM
3

I guess I wasn't raped when I told my gf at the time to stop and she didn't and all the times she psychologically forced me into having sex. It's truly a double standard that affects men because a lot of other people would consider either one of the above circumstances rape if I was a woman and she was a man.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 04:03 PM
1

While not naming the accused should be standard practice, it is amazing that it's not being used when the male is the alleged attacker and not when a woman is.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 03:58 PM
1

Sorry, I mistook the possession of the hole and whose hole it was. We are just arguing, but with the same point.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 04:03 AM
1

Allegedly and what he actually did are two separate things. I can say that you said, "I promise to give mtux96 $1,000,000," but it doesn't mean that you actually said it or if you did say it, when and under what circumstances. Maybe that will clear it up for you. Edit: also, if he promised to pay when the party crashers arrived, that would be solely based on the testimony of the three women, unless they can get the waiter/ess to vouch for them if he mentioned it when they were serving the group.…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 03:19 AM
1

Well it does depend at what point during the date that he was informed that he was paying for the other two women as well. If it was at the beginning, I would have said, have a great night, and then walked out with no further explanation. Yeah, I reread what you wrote. I woukd have done the same as you said, but that depends on how she reacted further, but I might have then just blacklisted her number by then.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 03:08 AM
1

If I was expecting to get a free meal whether or not I was promised one, I'd bring no money in hopes that he'd feel sorry and pay for my meal anyways. If he had a problem I'd just lie off my ass and say I'll pay him back later. /end hypothetical There is no hole other than the one you are trying to dig. The articles do a shoddy job at telling us when the "promise" was made. And if the promise was made prior to the date, then that is,between the man and the women and not the restaurant. the promi…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 03:01 AM
1

Though if you read the source linked in the second one, it says much of the same in a less snarky way. It mentions the date set up via FB and mentions that the guy said he will party for the meal, but doesn't say if that was from FB or verbally and hearsay from the women.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 07:39 AM
2

The date might have been set up via facebook, but it doesn't mean the "promise" nor the 2 extra quests were.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:58 AM
1

So if your wife nags you to do things, you can file a domestic violence charge against them for psychological abuse...
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:31 AM
3

But the verbal contract was between the man and the women, and not between the restaurant and the women. The women would still be obligated to pay for their meal, but not necessarily the guy's.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:31 AM
3

Anything in regards to "his promise" is a civil matter to be dealt between the women and the man involved. The actual bill and not paying for it is the criminal act and if the girls didn't pay their share, then they should be arrested as well, though it'll be more like "sign here, You have a court date where they will decide restitution for this matter and you are not welcome in the restaurant anymore." The "promise" would be left for a civil judge to decide.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:29 AM
2

They should then go after him for failure to keep his end of a verbal contract. They should be able to recoup their losses in a small-claims court. That is exactly it. The promise to pay is a civil matter and not a criminal matter. The criminal matter is not paying for the bill, which they all are at fault since none of them paid their portion of the bill. They all should have warrants for their arrests. And, then the "promise" is part of a civil small claims suit.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:26 AM
1

so..naive....
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:21 AM
64

but why 3 adult women would rely solely on the promise of a blind date. Because they are using dating sites to get free meals to be paid for some hopeless sap. And since, they wanted the free meal and don't want to get the punishment for skipping out on the bill, well.. connect the dots. They want to punish him for not paying for their dinner.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:17 AM
16

If I were him, I would have just went up to the waitress and just paid for my portion of the bill and let the girls pay for their own.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:14 AM
7

"derogatory texts" can mean anything.. He could have called her a "moocher" which could be very accurate, but can be deemed derogatory term.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:13 AM
3

More on the issue The woman brought along two friends, and the Sheffield man announced that he would pay for everyone’s meal. Even more The other half of the date showed up with two friends. Robinson allegedly promised to pay the $95 bill, Sounds to me that his "dates" are the ones saying that he promised to pay for them. But well, it could be either way, but chances are that the guy didn't expect the 2 other guests and thought he were to pay for them as well. His promise does not pass my "what …
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:12 AM
2

What are your thoughts on the law? Backstory: Woman and man gets divorced. Woman makes more than the husband. Woman is ordered to pay alimony to man. It happens that the husband is currently in prison for raping his wife. She fought and got a California State Legislator to write law to forbid alimony to go to those convicted on spousal rape. My Thoughts: On paper, it sounds like a good plan. However, I don't think the law goes far enough to prevent false reports of spousal "rape." I know it's on…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 07:14 AM
3

That's Amendment 454.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 05:56 AM
2

Show me the amendment that says we have the right to never be offended. It's Amendment 453 which states "I have the right not to be offended, though I have to right to offend other people." It's there somewhere, clear as night and day.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 05:14 AM
1

He's also wrong. A lot of men do not take sexual comments from strange women as compliments. I think it boils down to the same principle for both sexes. A) How does the person hitting on you look like? 1) Attractive? It's great and perfectly fine. 2) Unattractive? You are a perv and are making me feel uncomfortable. Now it boils down to what is attractive to person a or person b?
/r/MensRights07/04/12 05:11 AM
1

Well, I do see your point where this is slight related to MRM, I find it interesting to actually delve into the possibilities to where this could affect men, which I'm sure it does have one. I tend to do this on pretty much any issue and tend to look for things that may result in a particular action. There is probably a good chance that there has been a case somewhere that a woman HR person declined to hire another women that later went to blame her not getting the job on men and even possibly t…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 08:17 AM
1

That's the good thing about discussion. You can discuss items and explain other possible indirect results to an action that the article is talking about. Discussion does not need to be static. We don't need to stay directly on what the article is talking about. We can actually discuss other consequences and other reactions that the article or the OP does not touch on. While the article may not touch on any portion that may directly involve MRM, I see no problem touching on the other possibilitie…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 08:03 AM
1

Real-life happens outside of the article where Female A tries to get a job but is denied the job where a Male gets hired. Lets go further, lets say most of the workers in the job the woman was applying to for men. Who would she blame for not getting the job? The woman in charge of the actual hiring or the men who have the job that she desires? That is the scenario, which has the plausibility of occurring when I say it's feminist issue until they start blaming men for the end result of the proble…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:44 AM
1

It's a feminist issue until they start blaming men for the end result of the problem. This is more about women behaving badly and why it's not always a man's fault.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:20 AM
1

Well I think he should ask her before jumping to conclusions or simply just delete the offending program if he doesn't like it on there. Though, her snooping through his things is a little concerning and I would assume that she put the tracking app on there to spy on him, but that is only an assumption. Personally, I'd just give back the iPhone and say that you don't need or want it and let her have it.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:10 AM
1

I'm sure she set that up for him as well.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 07:05 AM
4

180 days? Whoopiedoodah!
/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:38 AM
1

I get to take 6 weeks off when my wife gives birth and will do so. But, I think California is special in this regard.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 07:01 AM
1

Yes, I would really like to see the article as well and might have to go to a library to read it. It may not be as bad as the cover makes it to be. It might actually be a decent article and from what I was able to find, it might not be that bad. But that being said: Some good things: The notion that the "wage gap" is disappearing, though I'm guessing that notion will continue on. I do believe women should earn the same as men for the same job and there should be no gap. But the problem with the …
/r/MensRights30/03/12 06:56 AM
3

Well it depends, it would actually be better to see what the article said. Though, the titling on the front cover of the magazine makes it sound like it's a good thing that woman make more to justify the notion that more women making more. I see it as an excuse to use when the "wage gap" disappears and they cannot use it as an excuse to further their cause anymore. So, now when the "gap" for women disappears and a new one appears for men, then it's a great thing that needs to be maintained. It's…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:47 AM
2

Unfortunately, I'm not a Time subscriber so I cannot read the whole article, but here is The Link to it
/r/MensRights29/03/12 05:47 AM
9

http://m.ocregister.com/news/loggins-343739-deputy-marine.html There you go.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 08:11 PM
9

Update on story is that the cop is back working in a non patrol position.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 06:24 PM
1

And if the kid has everything they need, then the money needs to be put into a savings account for the kid to later receive. The money is for the child, not the mother.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 11:31 PM
5

If I made a couple hundred thousand a year, I wouldn't be spending $600 on a pair of shoes. Electronics maybe, but not shoes.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 11:25 PM
1

I couldn't find anything, but I did find this Some men have complained that female-only workout facilities violate laws prohibiting gender discrimination. A few have even sued, though most have been turned away by the courts. One Wisconsin man's lawsuit against Curves prompted the state to pass a law exempting single-sex fitness centers from the state's discrimination laws. So the State decided to create new laws to make discrimination legal when men sued Curves. Further along the article(keep i…
/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:45 AM
0

Certainly it is celebrated less then women's day. Less celebrated because we'd be forced to feel guilty by celebrating it because they would say he hate women, are misogynists and try to claim everyday is International Mens Day. I don't see why we need a women's or men's day. Can't we just have a International Equality Day?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 05:32 AM
1

It had to do with it being a choice. BC is a choice, just as much as Viagra is a choice. But then again, it wouldn't be that big of a deal if they wanted to treat it as anything other medication to begin with and have it with a copay. They are treating it as special and sayng it has to be free. Why should I have to pay a copay for medication I have to take, when others get to take a medication that is a choice for free? Maybe that is being petty, but I think it it's a valid point. But I don't th…
/r/MensRights07/03/12 07:52 PM
1

Different situation, not different pill. I wasn't inferring the pill was different, but the situation. For medical reasos, it should be covered under the same basis of other meds. and like you said, different people have different financial situations and I guess for some it's ok that they can get something for free and others have to pay a copay. And you act like the $138 a month pill is thee only one out there when there is other pills out there that are cheaper that do the same thing, albeit …
/r/MensRights07/03/12 04:13 PM
1

Read my comment. Birth control for medical reasons is a different situation. And copays for the medication I take it's more than $100 a month.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 03:27 PM
1

My insurance covers birth control, but not viagra, but it does cover cialis. But then again, if it's not medically needed then I don't think they should be covered to begin with.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 08:34 AM
-2

Birth control used as medication is different than birth control to prevent pregnancy. And a lot of insurance companies already cover birth control anyways. And even without insurance, birth control isn't that expensive. My co-pays for my maintenance drugs (drugs I need to take to live) cost more than some birth control pills without insurance.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 08:33 AM
3

I think the second part of her quote settles it... "Justice cannot be for one side alone, but must be for both" I think that pretty much means the same for men as well, if you look at it at face value and not putting your own reflection on to what she really meant.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:22 AM
3

"Justice cannot be for one side alone, but must be for both" Then, I suppose that means that guys shouldn't be called "dicks" either but rather "assholes" as well. But all this talk about "dicks", "cunts" and "assholes" does is reminds me of Team America.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:20 AM
5

Someone needs to remind her that gay men are more of a minority than women.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 05:46 AM
1

It would also be cheaper to kill all people with actual health problems and impose a death penalty for all criminals, But I don't ever see that happening.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:18 PM
2

What Obama is giving out is not subsidized contraception, it is free contraception. Why should contraception be free when others who need to take medication to actually remain living need to pay co-pays? (I should know, my co-pays for my medicine cost more than a month's supply of contraception pills costs without insurance). And I'd even argue the point where you say contraception is healthcare. It is not healthcare when it's only used to prevent pregnancy. Personally, I feel the same about Via…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:03 PM
4

In August of 2011, the court issued a Domestic Violence Civil Protection Order (CPO) to protect my son and me from threats and acts of physical violence by Mark Byron. Contrary to what Mark is reporting, the protection order was not entered after an incident of alleged verbal abuse, but after court findings of domestic violence against me and our then six month old son. In January of 2011, Mark physically assaulted me and threatened my life with his fist above my face while I was holding our bab…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 09:02 AM
3

as long as he isn't actually written out threats as in "I'm going to beat you" or "I'm going to kill you." Stating his side of the story or how he perceives it is not a threatening statement, even if it happened to be some absurd story. It's not threatening to say "If you are an evil, vindictive woman who wants to ruin your husband's life and take your son's father away from him completely - all you need to do is say you're scared of your husband or domestic partner and they'll take him away." N…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 08:40 AM
2

and from what I saw, he only made a general blanket statement that didn't even mention her.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 08:33 AM
11

The kid is going to grow up knowing whatever the mother tells them about him, fiction or not.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 05:58 AM
11

I think it goes to some certain trolls making a post here and leave it up to where it gets a lot of upvotes and support for it. And then, here comes the troll portion... they change it to something completely fucked up to make MRAs look bad so they can post it elsewhere to bask in their trolling glory.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 05:55 AM
1

It's not a man's world anymore. That is an accurate portrayal of sexism. It'd be the same if someone claimed it was a man's world. Her response merely confirms her sexist attitude.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 03:04 AM
1

That was one extremely "lets guilt you" letter that I have ever read. She sounds extremely manipulative and is using terms and phrases to get the OP to not take her to court. "Why would you force a child and his family to live uncomfortably and unhappy and have us all wasting time and our money dragging this through court?" IMO, she is clearly trying to distance him out of his son's life as if he is not "family." And is trying to claim going to court will just be a waste and that he shouldn't do…
/r/MensRights25/02/12 02:07 AM
9

He didn't even mention her, if what he is quoting as saying is all that he said.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:50 AM
0

That's victim blaming.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 12:32 AM
2

Everything with a grain of salt and take things at face value. I'm going have to go with trolls being trolls and hassling the poor OP. It could be the other way, but it is what it is.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 09:08 AM
8

Bring able to defend yourself has nothing to do with making it okay for someone to abuse another. I was a victim of female on male violence.I did fear her because if I did anything to protect myself, she would hit harder and start grabbing items around her to hit me with. If I got her off of me by force which was the only way to get her to do so. she would go to her male friends and say that I abused her and they would come after me. She also threatened to plant drugs on me and get me arrested. …
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:23 AM
2

It also says that it doesn't collect data from it. How do they really know the failure rate?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:16 AM
3

I wouldnt care enough to even check out the website if I only saw a web address
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:13 AM
3

You really don't get what taking everything at face value and with a grain of salt really means. You just want him to be a serial rapist to fulfill your needs and desires. Whereas, anything comments geared towards him here is just comments based on the knowledge that we have and is what we are commenting towards. There is plenty of different possibilities and he might just be a serial rapist, murderer, flanderer, beggar, thief, butcher, baker or candlestick maker, but the fact remains is that ta…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:37 AM
7

Being accused means squat. It means nothing. Heck! You are the person who broke the back window of my car! You vandal! But then again, I have no broken window on my car but I'm going to accuse you anyway. Do you see how that works? It takes absolutely nothing to accuse a person of something, but it takes a bit more to actually be proven guilty rather than a claim. But of course, like anything on the internet, you have to take everything at face value and with a grain of salt.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:24 AM
2

To quote myself... Of course, contraception can be used for medical reasons, just as plastic surgery which in those cases it is healthcare. Taking contraception to prevent pregnancy as a choice is not healthcare.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 02:32 AM
1

Personal responsibility had been thrown out the window. It's always someone elses fault nowadays. prior don't want to own up to anything anymore and this goes across the board with anything, men and women, democrats and republicans, parents and teachers, teachers and taxpayers, etc.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 05:56 PM
13

Saying that she is not protecting herself is victim blaming. Saying he is not protecting himself is fine and dandy and he's a stupid idiot. Now of course, you won't be able to protect yourself all the time and bad things will still happen, but that is the point they always miss when they try to say you are victim blaming if you tell women to be careful and take stops not to end up in bad situations. Bad things happen, yes, and that is the reason why you need to protect yourself.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 08:39 AM
5

As more and more women have to pay alimony, I wonder if there will be more pressure to get rid of it completely.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 01:50 AM
–

Contraception =/= healthcare Contraception is a choice. If contraception is healthcare, I want free plastic surgery, not that I would get plastic surgery. Of course, contraception can be used for medical reasons, just as plastic surgery which in those cases it is healthcare. Taking contraception to prevent pregnancy as a choice is not healthcare. Pregnancy is not a disease.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 01:44 AM
3

Then if she elects to not get a DNA test, then there is no proof the child is his and court orders to get him to pay should fall flat.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 12:00 AM
1

Shannon Alicia Schmieder, 39, was told she will have to serve 20 years – by far the toughest sentence ever handed out by a US court to an educator accused of underage sex. Accused?? Really??? Since when do the accused get sentenced to 20 years minimum? She was convicted. Sure she was accused prior to that, but after being convicted, it's not really about being accused anymore. They are really trying to wash this story up. Also... I believe they got the longest sentence wrong also.. here's this g…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 10:06 AM
1

Ann example of why female on male dv is unreported.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 03:42 PM
3

I've seen anti-r/mensrights comments in r/nfl before. and r/mensrights was not even mentioned in the thread before the redditor attacked it.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 06:55 PM
5

It was a subtle and hidden bash of the MRM.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:30 AM
9

Isn't this from months ago?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:16 AM
1

but I don't think she should have apologized. They had me up to there. I don't think apologies are really sincere when they are made out of public pressure. It's amazing how many people accept them and let them go on. Especially considering that Sharon muffed her first apology.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:04 PM
4

So good, it had to be said twice.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:30 PM
2

1) No one should have to give up their seat for anyone else, so no. I think people holding a young kid, disabled or elderly should be given that seat, but this would apply to either sex. And, I don't think people should be ashamed to give up a seat in the hopes of a date either, even though it may not be the brightest of moves to begin with as a first step.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 05:19 AM
2

Love how they are getting into a tizzy about a pretty factual statement that they don't like because it is advantageous for them to have it. The sad part about marriage for a lot of men is that they can marry and be the breadwinner and the wife goes out and has an affair then gets a divorce because she gets caught and she still receives half his property. Personally, I don't see why anyone should be rewarded like that if they are the ones responsible for the breach of contract to begin with. Thi…
/r/MensRights07/02/12 05:11 AM
13

The flipside is when you do something chivalrous it's only because you want get in their pants... I say so what? Why should men be ashamed of trying to actually meeting a woman in the hopes for romance. And then, they wonder why we don't try.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 05:01 AM
2

The excuse that she goad him or teased him into beating her doesn't work if genders were reversed. He'd still be arrested, even if she was teasing him in any fashion. Having a commercial like this just normalizes woman on man violence and make it look acceptable. And Pepe le peu does not even come close to rape. He was merely a skirt chaser, not a rapist. Just because he was actively pursuing a "female skunk" doesn't mean he is a rapist. Anyone who thinks Pepe was a rapist thinks that all men wh…
/r/MensRights06/02/12 11:00 PM
2

Actually, I think proms are normally seniors, which may have 18 year olds. Unless you are only remembering your junior prom.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 07:22 AM
2

I had to stop reading when they started to grasp at straws in regards to Phil Hartman. Let's just such with the facts. Phil was murdered by his wife and people try to tie it to the drug abuse, which is a personal choice she chose, just like those husband that abuse their wives choose to drink alcohol. But I do agree that it is marginalized and that people try to find a reason besides the woman's fault and even try to claim the man deserved it. While cheating on your spouse is bad, it does not de…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:56 AM
8

You can buy them at your local CVS/Pharmacy.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 12:05 AM
7

Here's what she should have purchased before hand
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:51 PM
6

I don't think anyone who using the word "ur" for "your" is in any position to tell anyone who's ready or not or under what circumstances they are. What is worse is that they used "ur" for "your" and "you're."
/r/MensRights01/02/12 07:36 AM
1

Or it is a fake story to get twitter followers.this story does sound fishy to me, but then again that might because I'd still use the tickets to goto the super bowl even with no one to join me.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 01:41 AM
15

There is some truth to what the article said, but it it's buried behind an attack against men. The sleepover rule should be that you should get to know who is supervising the kids over there, whether it be a single mother, single father, a couple, or an entire extended family before you allow your child(ren) sleepover.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 12:40 AM
3

I believe they are completely ignoring and underplaying the possible psychological aspect of their decision. They want to believe it's a nice and great black and white decision, however it is not. They want to avoid possible gender roles that their child may get if they are raised as a boy or girl and believe that they are giving the child the choice to choose which gender they want. However, it's not that simple. It is very complex because after all most of our choices we go through while growi…
/r/MensRights28/01/12 07:42 PM
3

Sounds to me that what you are explaining is more like a problem of assigning tasks based on gender more than being forced to be male or female. If you feel tasks are male or female that is your problem and according to feminists, sexist because after all anything a boy can do, so can a girl. It is one thing to be able to choose your lot in life, but by raising the boy as genderless I think they are ignoring the fact that their boys may only end up choosing being female because they may feel tha…
/r/MensRights28/01/12 07:16 PM
0

... 3 months probation.* *likely guess of the sentence.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 09:16 AM
1

Heck I need to learn how to block then on my phone. I had to hit the back button multiple times to get out of the site. It kept reloading the page when I tried to back out.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 07:02 AM
5

actually, where's all the overly drunk people. Drugging people can be highly illegal. If they are already in a drugged up place, you are fine.* according to these lawyers.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 03:10 AM
2

not realizing that only her pal's divorced dad will be home. Sounds to me like she is saying that an unsupervised party is better.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 02:53 AM
5

Do you really want to bring that up? You might give ideas to some people to call CPS on single fathers.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 02:51 AM
3

....or son.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 02:49 AM
2

It will only affect convicted persons. However, false accusations can easily turn into convictions.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 07:26 PM
3

Yeah that's the other concerning aspect, this will only be against men because a women would hardly ever be convicted of DV or rape against their husband regardless if they are actually guilty of it or not.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 04:39 AM
1

She took advantage of me while I was drunk. No guy anywhere refers to being raped like this. You need to add more of an explanation as to how you were raped. If you want it to sound believable you say something like "I drank way too much and went to lie down in a bedroom and she came in and took off my pants and climbed on top of me and I could barely respond" If the OP was female and the accused was a man, it would be rape regardless if the OP took off their clothes and said "fuck me hard, righ…
/r/MensRights24/01/12 04:22 AM
7

Well technically, Dads could join Amazon Mom as well. It is just a horribly named service which makes males feel left out and less interested in joining because they see the word mom and think they don't qualify. Amazon is a scumbag for not naming it Amazon Parents.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 04:19 AM
8

I suppose Tampa Bay should close all their elementary schools as well since there isn't enough men working there as well.. Oh wait, that's not discriminatory.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 04:15 AM
5

So all they are saying in this article is that girls are the weaker sex and must be coddled to in order for them to succeed. Feminists should be up in arms about this action by the school board because they are clearly saying girls are weak beings.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 07:15 PM
1

In the heart of Oregon's Silicon Forest where parents are engineers and technicians for Intel, Tekronix and a dozen other technology companies, the shortage of girls in high school physics, engineering and technology courses is staggering. Just like the shortage of boys wanting to be nursing and teacher courses are staggering. Maybe it's just because girls have less interest in science/math/computers/engineering than boys. President Obama has made one of his priorities to ensure students are rea…
/r/MensRights23/01/12 07:12 PM
6

A better example would be a study between a bowl of feces and a bowl of asparagus. You offer people a choice between a bowl of feces and a bowl of asparagus and then claim that everyone loves asparagus because it was chosen every time. But without the choice of hyper-masculine clothing to go along with the hyper-feminine clothing, this "study" is null and void. But I can see them later claiming that kids are more likely to choose to be feminine based off of this highly inaccurate and unscientifi…
/r/MensRights21/01/12 09:47 PM
3

and others try to compare things in other countries to the country in which women do have privilege. Stephanie says: January 21, 2012 at 2:45 pm I am truly not impressed with this. I can tell you most if not all you say is not correct. Women do not stick up for other women when they are being attacked on a comment thread. I’ve experienced personally. Women generally coward along with everyone else on a thread when someone is being denigrated. If I heard a woman over 40 raving about a young man o…
/r/MensRights21/01/12 08:56 PM
2

To her, those false rape claims are only cases where the man was wrongly found innocent or forced the woman to recant her story.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 06:55 AM
0

There's more societal damage done to the falsely accused. expelled from school lost job you get shunned from society. There's more physical/emotional damage done to actual rape victims. Though, there is plenty of support out there for them whereas the falsely accused get none and have little recourse if it's later found out that they had nothing to do with an actual crime when the damage is already done. Though, the falsely accused problem can easily be fixed. 1) tougher penalties that are enfor…
/r/MensRights18/01/12 09:19 AM
2

It's ether opposite here. They see even trying to get rid of recess.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 07:43 AM
5

That's exactly what will happen and somehow it will be the boys that started the whole mess. I'm not saying the via are justified in doing do, but the mess started when someone complained that their previous daughter couldn't play basketball because not enough girls wanted to play and the district decided too solve it by saying boys can't play if girls can't.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 07:42 AM
5

At least, they named names.normally they don't unless it was a boy involved.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 07:38 AM
10

But boys can't be discriminated against because they are boys so it is ok and not a problem. /s
/r/MensRights10/01/12 07:37 AM
0

Although, this story does go against the idea that women are more caring and nurturing, which has some basis of reaffirming women as "better" teachers and custody holders. That is the one point that I can see, but that is something that you have to read into this story than take from it. The WTF of this story is that a) she didn't help him. b) she didn't pick him up and carry him and c) If she couldn't pick him up, she didn't have him stay there while she got help. Heck, if an adult broke their …
/r/MensRights09/01/12 10:22 AM
5

AT&T has another one that I have been seeing a lot lately. It's the one about the "invisible cord." Dad is looking for his cable to browse the internet. Mom and daughter point out that they got wireless now and that their "cords" are invisible. Dad continues to look for his cable. Dad asks again. Daughter sneerily says "Dad you already have one, it's invisible."
/r/MensRights09/01/12 10:15 AM
9

Equivalent but not exactly equal. Ovaries have a little more protection than a single fold of skin. A shot to a woman's ovaries is akin to a shot to the kidneys in that they lay within layers of protection consisting of skin, fat and muscle.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 11:11 PM
3

I can see your point as well. However, they might have intended it to be one thing, but what it is actually saying to others is different. It really should have said "I didn't force him." it would have sent a clearer message that didn't put blame on the male victim and kept it in line with the rest of their ad campaign.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 08:05 AM
14

So the second one should read... "So when she was drunk, we didn't" It's completely blatant in my eyes. When the woman is the victim, the "attacker" should have stopped it. When the man is the victim, they both are to blame and should have stopped it.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 07:45 AM
23

The homosexual pissed me off the most. Man with woman: I didn't Man with woman: I didn't Man with Woman: I didn't Man with Man: We didn't <--- WTF! This was a blantant anti-male propaganda series set out to bash men.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 07:23 AM
12

Men get yelled at for leaving, and now they get yelled at for being a great parent.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 07:18 PM
6

Yes. Do we actually execute people? No.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 07:12 PM
6

to all my haters - bite me! Or try and see what happens when you bite me ;) mmm.. is this page violent -credible threat or sexual explicit content?
/r/MensRights04/01/12 05:00 AM
2

But compared to women and children first, weight based is probably slightly better. Less pressure pushing down on the vessel, then less pressure at the leak. But it still wouldn't solve the people climbing over others issue and will still lead to costly bottlenecks within the cabin.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 04:36 AM
2

to quote myself.. men typically But also keep in mind, you cannot ask a women their weight because then they'd get mad so therefore, you'd need to assume that all the men are heavier than any of the women in the plane. But either women and children first or the heaviest is a horribly inefficient way to get people off a vehicle that is crowded and crammed into a very small, confined place. You'd be stalling the line by waiting for women and children climbing over or around men. It should be one r…
/r/MensRights31/12/11 04:29 AM
2

Though her lawyers would find ways to alter the pre-nup in their favor anyways and she divorced him right after she gained lifetime alimony status in California. I really think this divorce was long-planned.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 04:20 AM
1

How would you feel if you learned that she also gets lifetime alimony as well considering the fact that she just passed the lifetime alimony threshold in California?
/r/MensRights31/12/11 04:19 AM
1

Are Fantasy Romance Novels misandry?
/r/MensRights31/12/11 04:14 AM
1

Well to the police it is rare because it's seldom reported or misreported as the male beating the female. Or when they do take it "seriously," they laugh at it.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 04:03 AM
2

dying young can and is sometimes linked to worker stress, therefore somewhat germane. Same goes for suicide. There are a lot of societal issues that can lead one to suicide. Some include stress coming from financial reasons(Men feeling that they cannot provide for their family) , etc. Work Related Stress: Story
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:51 AM
1

It's the breakdown of the social contract between the sexes and one side still wants all their benefits from that broken contract.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:38 AM
1

Why try to achieve "female equality" rather than strive for Gender Equality? Trying to strive for Gender X rights or Gender Y rights is a folly, stupid and ignorant attempt to fix a solution and only drives us away from gender equality. You cannot have equality at the cost of anothers, no matter how bad they had it in the "past." While there may be misogyny more in your life, I have seen more misandry and women actually having it easier. Where I have worked: 1) Men have to wear a dress shirt and…
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:36 AM
1

in for drug offenses, and in some cases, women are more likely to get rehab as an option.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:09 AM
1

And a lot of women cannot take a joke, even though they tell even dirtier tales about each other behind each other's backs.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:07 AM
7

and men typically are heavier, therefore should be let off first in a slowly, sinking vessel..
/r/MensRights31/12/11 02:25 AM
2

I can understand that somewhat, but we are talking about Best Buy, a typical male oriented store. It isn't Kohls. Men trend to be more interested in technology than women. Never BB was just trying too hard to be funny. And, maybe it something about the look the women give Santa in the commercial. But I think they took it a little far in avoiding hsving any make in their commercials. They are either the bad guy our shopping with their female SO in the blurred background or helping a female.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 03:38 PM
1

More men supposedly drink therefore high prices aimed towards men? or Women expect men to buy them drinks at the club and since alcohol will cost more then it costs men more? Ok i'm reaching.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 03:47 AM
1

wow. I originally though it was just Red State vs Blue State, ie. Democrat vs Republican. Democratic being more women friendly and Republican being more women hating.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 03:21 AM
2

That would be sexist.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 02:15 AM
3

and the other guy who actually fathered the child will still be on the hook, or worse the guy she tricked into putting his name on the birth certificate still will be.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 02:14 AM
4

That would be considered sexist by the same people clamoring fit women only floors.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 08:00 AM
1

..if cooking for your spouses family is "abuse", we are done. Actually, my cooking could be considered as abuse. Unless it is simple things like a grilled cheese sandwich or a microwave entree and even then I get it wrong sometimes. I just cannot cook.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 06:44 AM
1

Actually, she did stay a millionaire in the first place until it was financially beneficial for her to leave. In California, a 10 year marriage is considered a long term marriage and is more likely to result in permanent alimony. Though, the court may rule differently. They were married for 10 years 8 Months.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 06:36 AM
1

A lot of posts in that thread are disturbing. A lot of people there are already demonizing the man in the picture without even a mention to why he'd rather be single. List of disturbing posts from that thread: A lot of guys string women along with a promise of marriage and never follow through because secretly they want that door to remain open. Your ex is a bastard. As someone who was dumped by the guy I was engaged to marry, I can attest to the truthfulness of this statement! - Yes because som…
/r/MensRights26/12/11 06:23 AM
1

...and file a complaint.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 08:11 AM
1

It's one thing to comfort them, but without any facts behind it they cannot really come out and say that it wasn't their fault to comfort them.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 07:47 AM
5

I think the bigger issue its the comments saying that she is not to blame. they are treating her as if she did nothing wrong even though there is no mention of anything except he doesn't want to be in a relationship with her.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 10:50 PM
1

She will get half plus alimony for life. She will still date of course, but will not remarry so the payments will keep coming. She didn't divorce until now, so she could get the alimony. You can deride Kobe all you want about cheating, but that doesn't excuse her being a scumbag for waiting10 years to get lifetime alimony under California law. Both sides are scumbags.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 12:38 AM
7

For one you need to stop wasting time addressing feminists and instead go after the LAW. You cannot go after the law without addressing the law. The moment you go after the law then some groups of feminists will just stand up and shout back against you. You cannot separate the two, especially when a lot of these laws are feminist-backed laws. It's impossible because if we don't address feminists, then they will make us address them.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 04:34 AM
6

Of course, if you use the training you used on girls then you would get charged with assault. You simply cannot win here.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 03:13 AM
12

Young Girls Attack/S..." This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated due to multiple third-party notifications of copyright infringement from claimants including: Disney Disney The Cartoon Network, Inc. Sorry about that.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 08:58 PM
1

Being drunk is a poor excuse of getting away from your own personal responsibility. It's no big secret that when you drink alcohol that you become more willing to say yes to do things that you wouldn't do sober. The thought that you cannot consent drunk is only an excuse used by people who regret what they did while they were drunk. Drinking alcohol has its risks and if you are willing to forgo those risks and go out drinking, you are giving consent to those risks. If it's legal when you are sob…
/r/MensRights15/12/11 06:22 AM
2

All men have. Some women just believe all men have raped someone only on the basis that they are male and therefore tricked women into having sex, even if the guy is a virgin, he's a rapist because he has the "weapon."
/r/MensRights15/12/11 06:08 AM
3

I highly recommend that all men avoid having sex with ANY person that has had to much to an alcoholic drink. Fixed it a little bit.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 06:06 AM
1

The video tape would still just show her drunk and therefore it would be rape. We are handling sex and alcohol with kiddie gloves and dare not to bring up any risk for women when they consume it, whereas we spend millions of dollars each year to fight driving and alcohol. Alcohol makes you do things you normally wouldn't do and it doesn't matter whether you are female or male. By consuming alcohol, you are consenting to the results of its usage. It's not like men are forcing most women to drink …
/r/MensRights15/12/11 06:05 AM
2

Here's a search on suffrage on this sub 11 articles found. 7 show a 0 count 2 show a 1 count 1 shows a 11 count (it was talking about male suffrage) 1 shows a 6 count (discussion was more about the military draft) But that is only searching under "suffrage". Any other search is too broad, but I have not heard anyone really come out and say that women shouldn't get to vote, especially any incidents that were not downvoted. You should not have to provide evidence that it doesn't exist. He is the o…
/r/MensRights11/12/11 08:58 AM
2

What do you think the odds of her claiming that he was beating her comes up during the trial?
/r/MensRights11/12/11 07:43 AM
1

SO it's just false all-around.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 06:50 PM
1

It is believed to be the first time in the US where a sex victim has been documented to be forced to pay her convicted attacker.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 06:45 AM
1

Until they ask for more or fight against having it reduced, then it its for the child (ren). Child support is not a bad idea, it is the abuse that is.if it all went to the child (ren), if have no issue with it.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 07:59 PM
2

These girls look familiar
/r/MensRights02/12/11 09:09 AM
1

And I had trouble backing out of it afterwards. I had to keep hitting the back key on my phone over and over again.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 01:18 AM
2

Well, she is only accused and all it does say is that she's said sexist remarks, but no detail to whether it was sexist to women or men.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 09:18 AM
2

So 'it is claimed that' she's made some sexist remarks too, but didn't express what it was that she said.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 07:58 AM
2

*One of them.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 07:21 AM
1

|"No, but it'll make you happy, so why not." She said yes to sex when she completed that sentence. Just because 'No' happens to be in that phrase, does not mean she's saying no. She's actually saying yes, "why not"
/r/MensRights19/11/11 07:47 AM
-1

And, they are even trying to take that away and replace it with other kid favorites like tofu and hummus.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 07:42 AM
6

egads.. read the comments. |rape him (= --2 weeks ago |kick his balls more -- 3 weeks ago |Piss on him LOL --- 1 month ago Imagine the outrage if the little boy was a girl and the sisters were brothers.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 08:14 PM
20

If he continues with the lawsuit against her, I may actually have some respect for the fellow.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 08:07 AM
2

The woman should join in and help him? Yeah, that would create a big shitstorm if that was said to a woman experiencing the same thing.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 06:45 AM
3

I would have loved it when I was 16. I think most 16 years old mature enough to deal with sexuality and a lot of them are already dealing with it. The main problem here is the double standard in which women are treated with lesser penalties than men for the same crime. For men, people would be saying that he was trying to entice the 16 year old to have sex, he was a pervert and should be locked away for life, whereas she's only getting probation for five years and only can use the internet at wo…
/r/MensRights16/11/11 06:27 AM
5

Problem isn't that. The problem is the double standard in which women are punished.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 06:16 AM
1

Personally, I see no real issue with it if both men and women were treating equally about it. The problem and issue here is that if roles were reversed, the man would be facing more than a misdemeanor and probation, but would be facing a felony and prison/jail time.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 06:16 AM
1

If you as a man have sex with a woman you're accepting the risk of potentially becoming a father. Yes and No. You have sex with a condom, you are accepting the risk of potentially becoming a father based on the risk of it while wearing a condom, not having extraneous actions to end up landing you to be a father. Just like if you are using the withdrawal method and the woman keeps going even though you said no and that you have to pull out. You accept the risk of getting her pregnant using the wi…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 07:46 PM
7

a felony charge of dissemination of matter harmful to minors and a misdemeanor charge of contributing to the delinquency of a minor
/r/MensRights15/11/11 07:35 PM
1

45.3 percent and growing. MIT is a technology/engineering school where a lot of women are just not interested in for a variety of different reasons. Considering that, 45.3 is a good percentage for a technology/engineering school where a good percentage of women shy away from.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 07:24 PM
1

Men would be laughed at and be called crazy and women-haters if they tried to do so.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 06:15 AM
8

If they say anything like "most rooms are male" I have doubts on that considering that the majority of college students are women now.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 06:13 AM
3

But if it's statutory rape, people still demonize guys for that.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 06:11 AM
4

... and then they ask why men are avoiding women and choosing to just play video games instead? The only correct thing to do in college if you are male under these circumstances.
/r/MensRights14/11/11 07:13 PM
2

Personally, it is not about what the image says, but rather the double standard of it being ok if it is about men but wrong if it was about women.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 05:13 PM
5

Gloria Dwomoh, a 31-year-old nurse from Walthamstow, London, During her trial, Dwomoh told the court she and her siblings had been fed the same way by her mother in Ghana. She was a nurse? ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights13/11/11 09:37 AM
9

"I like rich men."
/r/MensRights13/11/11 04:01 AM
2

Another one of these items where men/boys get discriminated against only on the basis that men/boys have more interest in it. It's like how people want to give women extra opportunity to get into It/Engineering because of the "disparity" that is only created because women have less interest in it.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:05 PM
1

My guess would be the false DV charge. But well, good luck and hope things work out for the best.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 09:48 AM
1

McDonald's has been a big offender this year. They mentioned the McRib one which I haven't seen yet, but the other one was the couple sitting down eating McDonalds and the gal was talking about her friend's beau thinking Sunday was for football and forcing her beau to agree that it was a folly. Pretty much saying that men shouldn't and cannot have any hobbies, even one that only occupies 18-20 days a year.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:44 PM
0

"In my defense ppl, the media have blown the whole 'tampon' incident way out of proportion. It was nothing but a prank that was in no way, shape, or form intended to be assulting as the tampon was clearly green!! ..." and had a man done this to a man, it wouldn't be a prank but sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 07:23 AM
2

one of his victims wants to break her gag order and go public. She could get more money by talking(or lying/stretching the truth) to the press about a presidential candidate than what she got from her settlement.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 07:17 AM
2

My ex-gf stayed on top of me when I told her to stop and she refused.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 04:35 AM
5

More women also report it than men if it actually happens to them.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 04:34 AM
1

Well I think you just nailed the bulleyes on why these posters are the big issue here. It's not that they portray men as abusers. It's that they only portray men as abusers.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 04:31 AM
7

The sadder part is that if a woman went into the police and saying a man did that to her, she wouldn't even need any evidence to back any of it up to begin with.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 04:24 AM
1

Even if it was portraying male physical abuse, I find it wrong. Mainly because both sides throw their own punches. It should not be targeted to one side. When you do that, you are saying that only males commits the act, even though both sides do it. Then you screw up the stats on it, because males then don't report the abuse because all they hear is that only males do the abusing and then they go on to believe that no one will believe them if they said anything about it.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 04:22 AM
3

Probably because it's far more prevalent issue: Probably because it's far more prevalent for women to report abuse, as opposed to men and then you need to consider the men are deemed to be abusive only because they were defending themselves from an abusive woman. It's not as badly apart as these "stats" make them out to be. There's a mass portion of under-reporting as well as over-reporting, both working against men.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 04:19 AM
4

the vast majority of abusive relationships are with the male controlling. Even, if you can pull any stats or references for that, they would be highly skewed to begin with due to underreporting. While women have physical/emotional threats to worry about, men have physical/emotional as well as legal threats as well. It doesn't take much for a woman to say that she'll claim that he was hitting her rather than the other way around when the police arrive to make the man think twice before calling an…
/r/MensRights24/10/11 04:15 AM
2

I don’t understand. I removed the offending post, why are you still angry? Why do I have a profile on this site with murders if all I did was write ONE blog post, that I removed within 24 hours of you becoming offended? I’m terrified for my life at this point. When this was just banter yesterday, I fought back, but now I’m so scared for my family because all these forums are talking about violence against me. PLEASE remove this. I’m just a housewife with a little blog. I have no agenda to harm y…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 05:41 PM
1

Did that study also track how many rapes were not reported by females and how many were not reported by males?
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:43 AM
7

So she said 99% first and now is downgrading the figure down to 90%. I see what she did there. She's just pulling numbers out of her ass.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 05:48 AM
9

And she had a previous court issue that she didn't follow as well.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 10:46 PM
2

Sarcasm does not translate well via text. Don't know if trollin' or sarcasm.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 07:50 AM
3

brass knuckles and trying to get back up(you can seem them trying to get back up in the video), yes hitting them while they are still kind of down is called for when they are still trying to get back up.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 04:54 PM
5

What if the only rooms that are available are on the female only wing, then men get affected.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:56 AM
2

Same thing happened to me. Though, luckily she didn't get pregnant. She got pissed when I was trying to get her off after I told her to stop and that I was about to cum. Then, tried to use the time that I did ejaculate inside her earlier in the relationship against me, even though when I did I asked her explicitly if she wanted me to and she said yes. The time she got me to ejaculate inside her without a condom was at the time which I was trying to break it off and she just wouldn't except it. S…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 06:55 PM
3

Chastising cutting off communication with his family (#3) I love how that's even on the list. Some people have complete horrible families that make it a better situation for everyone involved to have no communication with.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:48 AM
2

... and some don't eat meat, but will eat eggs or fish or milk or no milk, some even only eat fruit.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:28 AM
2

But, housewives are anti-feminism. To feminists, a housewife is giving into the power of men. They view it as a strike against them if a woman chooses to be a housewife.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 06:07 AM
2

I think you almost got the point. I see the bigger issue is that if the OP was a woman and this occurred, it would be bigger news and the person doing the sexual assault would be vilified in public and no one would have cared if they committed suicide or not and would probably be going around and saying "good riddance."
/r/MensRights06/10/11 06:59 PM
3

Go tell that to a group of women and see how well that goes over. They might just decide to go out and have walks in protest.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 06:56 PM
3

men may later get released if the numbers don't add up. May is the operative word. If the numbers don't add up, I'm not so sure that the next round wouldn't just be more women.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 04:39 AM
3

I researched further and all I can find is articles about female prisoners being released. Your link shows nothing about male prisoners. Search Google news for "California male inmates release" and you find articles about a hunger strike. You search for "California female inmates release" and you find articles about females being released.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 08:50 AM
3

That must have been one hell of a mature looking 12 year old.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 06:57 AM
0

Yes you have some fault of personal responsibility if you get beaten as a hobo if you dressed like one, or if people treat youvas a gangsta if you dress as one, or dress in skimpy clothing when there is a rapist that targets skimply dressed women. Though, that still does not excuse the actions of those doing wrong. It's about personal responsibility vs social responsibility. The scantily dressed woman will be at fault of personal responsibility whereas the Rapist will be at fault of social respo…
/r/MensRights01/10/11 03:42 PM
4

When women do turn to violence against men it is usually in self defense. I guess making eggs for an ex-gf is a reason for her to use self-defense against me. /s
/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:53 PM
1

I think someone likes to call people feminists who do not agree with him.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:00 AM
1

Let me know... I'll join them in their protest while holding a sign saying that my ex-GF used to beat me, and I;ll even show off the scar where she burned me with a cigarette.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 07:50 AM
3

Condoms don't protect you from all STD's. You can still get herpes since the condom doesn't cover everything.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:05 AM
1

Based on this case, my ex could go to prison for raping me. She was on top and I told her to stop, that I was going to climax soon, but she continued until I climaxed inside of her, even though I tried to get her off of me.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 06:12 PM
2

You are reading too much into things. The flip side of your argument is that men don't need someone to be protective of them and they can be independent on their own, which is a more a slight hit against women than men if you want to look at it that way. Now, lets switch the young woman in the car with a young man in the car, and read too much into it. You realize what that portrays? It would show that a man needs someone to look after him and he will not be able to live in this world without so…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 05:43 PM
1

What a great way to turn something positive into a negative! You are trying to find something wrong with this. "OMG they have him talking and being protective of his daughter.. OH MY! It's showing men in a bad light." I simply don't see that. I see a Dad being a Dad and not some bumbling idiot imbecile. And it shows him interacting with his daughter in a nice way as opposed to in a bad "I'm a perv" kind of way. I'm sure he'd look after his son in a similar fashion if a son was also written into …
/r/MensRights26/09/11 07:50 AM
3

That will depend on the rapist. He/she might have attacked the victim because they dressed provocatively. Or it could be because the victim had red hair or was just I'm the wrong place at the wrong time.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 04:28 PM
2

And no one was telling them what not to west or where to go. It wasn't about telling them what not to do, but simple precautions that you could use, not that you had to.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 04:22 PM
3

Potential victims should learn to protect themselves. As for potential predators, what are you going to do lock everyone up that looks suspicious? That is against the Constitution here and should be illegal everywhere. You cannot arrest everyone because you feel they might commit a crime, which is why potential victims should learn to protect themselves.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 04:18 PM
2

A grandfather is a male, therefore it can never be rape.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 04:08 PM
1

the biggest part of this story I have a issue with is the amount of bail. How much would a man's bail be?
/r/MensRights21/09/11 07:45 AM
3

This whole mess shows exactly why you shouldn't post things online about something horrible that happened to you. More so, it shows why you shouldn't post it and push an agenda along with it. Stories with an agenda behind them are scrutinized more. People simply don't trust people with agendas as they do trust people telling a story without an agenda.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 07:31 AM
8

Except, this isn't about whether or not 16 year olds are old enough, but rather the punishment handed out to a female as opposed to a male. If it were a male, he'd be labeled a sex offender for life, whether or not you feel it's not bad or not.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 04:11 PM
2

I could probably get it down to 50.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 07:15 AM
6

It was a lot of text to be reading on a computer screen with no good clean breaks.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 06:25 AM
13

So if a man suspects a woman of cheating on him, he can go out and slap and push her around without being arrested? There's no hard evidence that he is even cheating on her with "Mary." It's just that he is talking and texting to some girl named Mary that he even introduced to her(though that doesn't exclude cheating on her). But it is not very hard evidence, just as if she was talking to some other man, it would not prove cheating.
/r/MensRights10/09/11 06:24 AM
12

I apologized for slapping and pushing her." How do you think people would take that? How do you think law enforcement would take that, even if she was not really physically hurt. They'd still take it as a threat and say if he could do this, he's capable of doing more in the future. I was in an abusive relationship before. That is exactly how it starts. It might start with a little name calling here and there, then maybe some small punches and pushes here and there. Then, it is full on punching, …
/r/MensRights10/09/11 06:20 AM
2

Vons, a grocery store in So. Cali owned by Safeway, collects donations for Prostate Cancer Awareness every year.
/r/MensRights05/09/11 06:26 AM
0

maybe you should just keep unrelated politics out of the discussion.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:47 AM
-1

No, they get written off as someone who actually photographs something of interest without including extraneous subjects in the picture. I simply see more women holding something in a picture than I see a man holding up an item that he wants to show off. And, I'm not even saying men don't do the "Here's an item, but I want to be in the picture as well" either, some do. But as a whole I see more women holding up objects to show Reddit than I see Men doing it.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 06:41 PM
0

Except I see more women do this than men. But either way, most are capable of being photographed with no person in it and probably should if you want that to be the focus. And, yes I have seen men being commented on as well when they are shown in pictures as well. It is not only women being commented in these pictures. Compare and Contrast: Picture of an item made by a reddittor that probably could have had a person in it, considering it is a shirt, but didn't Picture of an item made by a reddit…
/r/MensRights21/08/11 04:15 PM
–

Then why include herself in the picture? There's a lot of pictures where the picture could be taken without a person in the picture, but yet they choose to be in it.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 03:46 PM
4

I'm not saying to cut them out of their lives. Just don't let her drop them off at your house like that. If your ex tried everything to stop you from getting custody, I'd be afraid she'd try to anything and everything to screw you later on, like maybe trying to say you owe her support since you are acting as a father for them by letting them into your house. Not that she'd win or even do it, but is it worth the hassle of finding out?
/r/MensRights15/08/11 03:43 AM
9

You should not let her drop her kids(with another man) at your house. At least, I wouldn't without fear of her trying to dump responsibility on you.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 02:51 AM
1

I knew r/politics was spilling all over the place. But this is just out right insane.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 08:55 AM
6

This came up in the Casey Anthony trial also when it was brought up that her father and brother supposedly molested her when she was younger, as if it had anything to do with the trial at hand.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 05:59 PM
2

I like to mention to people who demand the seat to be down that I at least had the courtesy of actually lifting the seat before going rather than getting the seat all wet like some others do.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 05:10 AM
2

Videoly Related - possible NSFW
/r/MensRights22/07/11 06:09 PM
1

why should a post from an user unrelated to the mod ban the whole subreddit? By that merit, anyone can walk into any subreddit and start posting personal info to get that subreddit shut down. Edit: unless it had been up for awhile and the mod left it up, which I don't believe is the case here.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 06:06 PM
3

This is a better idea, because it also has less debate.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 06:07 AM
0

It is relevant to Men's Rights because we should hold our standards above the standards of what the other side thinks. We shouldn't be going around approving of lists that can be deemed to be pigeonholing the other side to be a certain way. Just because they do it all the time, does not mean we should do it at anytime we get the chance. This is why I have a problem with a list of "bad parents" that only lists mothers. It stoops to the level of feminists that try to claim only men are aggressors …
/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:47 AM
0

You need 50/50 male & female? But that doesn't reflect reality either. You completely got me all wrong and are reading into this more than what I am even saying. I'm not even saying this list should be 50/50. A single father listed here would be sufficient, if he truly deserved to be on this list, and I'm sure someone can dig one or two up that would be able to replace a couple of mothers on this list. All I am saying that this list of "bad parents" that lists only "bad mothers" is not a good ex…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:20 AM
0

Don't come in here and make the assumption that mothers and fathers are equally sick at murdering and abandoning their children. Equality is a fucking myth, and studies show WOMEN KILL THEIR GOD DAMN CHILDREN MORE OFTEN THAN MEN. Am I biased? and I wasn't saying a single damn thing about whether or not mothers kill their children more than men. I was just saying that the list appears to be biased because it only shows women. Of course, it could just be that the top 13 are all women, which I did …
/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:05 AM
2

Not murdered but Man burns 2 month old in microwave and I disagree. #3 is the same as number 7 on the "list". 3 in the man example is killing his child for doing something kids do. Cry 7 is a woman killing her child for doing what kids do.. throwing crap. If my #3 example doesn't apply for you, neither does #7 on the list. and once again, I'm not trying to disprove that mothers kill children more often or not. Just that this list has the propensity of being biased by only showing bad mothers whe…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:01 AM
-2

There I fixed my sentence so people with trouble with reading comprehension can understand it better. "If you" was not insinuating that you actually thought that. It was a If statement and you is not necessarily "you' persay. You are reading more into my statement than what's there. You are seeing it as a personal attack, which is by no mean by what I meant by it. hence, why I said "If you" and not "that you are".
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:51 AM
3

Man abandons his son on the side of the freeway Man burned son in hot oven Man strikes 7 month old daughter for crying while he was moving
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:46 AM
-4

If you want to look at the world as if only women are capable of harming their kids, you are no better than the feminists out there that try to pin men as the only aggressors out there. This is what this list is if it's claiming to be the worst parents and only listing mothers. Now, maybe the worst 13 just happen to be women, but well it does make it look to be biased. "If you want" , not "You want" If is the operative would. along with.. "This is what the list is" Not, "what you are" Reading Co…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:37 AM
0

You are completely missing my point, and you really need to stop putting words in my mouth like you did earlier by misquoting me by cutting off the portion that states I was talking about the list and not you. This items listed in this list might be fact, but it's not the whole picture. Yes, women do bad things, just like men do bad things as well. My problem with this list is that it's trying to present it a list of bad "parents" which it omits any mention of any man that is a bad parent as wel…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:22 AM
-6

You're the idiot. Perhaps you should post the entire quote, instead of cutting off a portion to make it sound as if I was saying that you said "that only women are capable of harming their kids" Read the whole Fucking factual quote and not a portion of it that cuts it off to say something else. Here it is: If you want to look at the world as if only women are capable of harming their kids, you are no better than the feminists out there that try to pin men as the only aggressors out there. This i…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:16 AM
4

Of course, replace short guy, with tall dark and handsome and rich.... and replace personality, with body, butt and hair.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 07:28 AM
13

Yet, they want this big sexual revolution where women can sleep with many many men and not be seen as a slut. and still hate guys and call them disgusting players for sleeping with them.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 07:21 AM
3

No it's not! - possibly NSFW
/r/MensRights20/07/11 07:19 AM
10

If one wants to look at the world as if only women are capable of harming their kids, one is no better than the feminists out there that try to pin men as the only aggressors out there. This is what this list is if it's claiming to be the worst parents and only listing mothers. Now, maybe the worst 13 just happen to be women, but well it does make it look to be biased. And by no means am I saying that mothers are not capable or even are harming their kids less, I'm just saying the list looks bia…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 05:35 PM
18

I'd say this is just a list of bad mothers. There's no dad listed :. I'm inclined to think whoever wrote this has some sort of agenda to push. Even if it's Men's Right, we simply cannot be biased ourselves. I'd just feel better about this list if there was a couple of dads as well, otherwise this list only is a worst mother's list, which does show that mothers can do harm to their kids.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 05:25 PM
6

If a man chopped off a woman's tits and clit, would you sit here saying "well, she may have deserved it but we just don't know yet, let's wait to praise his action until we know the full story". Fuck no, you'd be sickened, just as pretty much everyone here would. Come on. No, they'd be talking all week about how gruesome and disgusting is was and that all men are creeps. Even if she was coming at the guy with a knife as well.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 04:36 AM
2

The police can drop charges and charge the accuser with making a false police report and you can still be in trouble with the school.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 05:17 PM
7

I have coached boys and girls soccer teams and baseball and softball teams. It is easy to tell the difference between the two. My goal on the boys soccer team was to have them "play like girls" - meaning, play for each other, celebrate each other and team comes first. It was a lot of work, because that is not how boys play. We would play teams that were all about an individual star better than any of our players....but we always won. That is from the comments. Really sickening. "play like girls"…
/r/MensRights17/07/11 06:59 AM
33

I think this is demeaning to both men and women. Men because it makes us look like weak, bumbling idiots. Women because it makes them look like homicidal pyschos.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 06:20 PM
1

Harrassing the business, not for walking into the opposite sex's locker room naked.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 10:35 PM
0

The part of this story that belongs in Men's Right is that if this was a man walking into a women's locker room naked, chances would be that the man would be arrested and labeled a sex offender and the women would demand money and probably receive it.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 10:05 PM
1

Got or demanded, it's still too much.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 09:37 PM
0

Still $375 USD too much.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 08:33 AM
3

Don't underestimate the stupidity of ultra-extreme feminists.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 06:38 AM
9

Then why are men only required to do it? And it's a strong required, not a flimsy "it's ok" if you don't kind of required.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 06:22 AM
3

There is at least one female guard holding back one prisoner, the other looked like she was on the phone, possibly to alert more folks. This is a non-story on top of the fact, it doesn't matter who you'd replace the incompetant person with as long as they are competent. It doesn't matter if they are male or female as long as they get the job done. Mens Rights isn't about putting the rights of females down.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:22 AM
3

He doesn't have to say no. He was too drunk to consent. At least, that's what I hear when a woman has sex when she was drunk, even if both parties were drunk like skunks... or even if the woman was slightly buzzed. TL;DR: No one should take advantage of a drunk person whether they are male or female.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 06:22 AM
2

I do think all accused of rape should remain anonymous until a guilty conviction has been reached. Those against it always try to hide behind the notion that the accused should be named publically to "find" other victims. Now they are trying to only give anonymity to a group of people that have greater access to multiple victims. In cases of rape when the male accused are considered guilty before a trial even starts, they deserve anonymity. Any other victims can come forward after a guilty verdi…
/r/MensRights09/07/11 04:50 PM
2

I’ve known white men who say that they are just “more attracted” to Asian women (not too long after these remarks, I slowly edge out of the room). But of course that’s not true. They’re “more attracted” to what they think Asian women are — that is, what they want Asian women to be. As soon as they find out that I am as far from a docile, domestic doll as can be, I’m not Asian enough for them anymore. That's a very subtle racist comment and is assuming these guys left her because they thought she…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 04:25 AM
3

At the time of the lies, it was a missing persons case which turned into a kidnapping case based upon lies told. It became a murder case after searches proved fruitless and eventually found the body wrapped with duct tape in woods close to the Anthony household. Though I truly believe that is Casey was male, he wouldn't be charged with lying to officials but rather obstruction of justice for leading the police away from her true whereabouts.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 06:25 PM
8

I was raped in the sense that I stopped my consent during the act. I was with my ex-gf at the time and was trying to break it off. She still found a way to get me into having sex with her. We never used protection besides the withdrawal method. This time was no different. She was on top of me and I told her to get off because I was about to cum. But she didn't stop and resisted me trying to push her off. I eventually came inside of her. She tried to claim she was pregnant but she never took a te…
/r/MensRights05/07/11 01:41 AM
8

He forgot the part where if you had a low paying job and got a new higher paying job, they could take you to court to have the child support risen, but if you are forced to take a lower paying job, it's extremely difficult to get it reduced.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 02:06 AM
5

Do you know what really increases the brain power of a group? Hire smart people regardless of race, gender, sexual preference and so on. You can still hire a diverse group of dumbasses.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 06:37 PM
2

This title is a total disgrace. Lets focus on the act, not what the person looks like. Looks have no basis on why she did the act. It's no better than people labeling guys as pedophiles, just by what they look like.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 09:30 AM
5

Just like they are cutting recess and then complaining that boys are misbehaving in class... and then trying to medicate them instead of letting them get their steam out on the playground.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 06:20 AM
5

So if they cannot have lawyers, neither should the other side.. What gets me is the following: "A requirement that the state provide counsel to the noncustodial parent in these cases could create an asymmetry of representation that would 'alter significantly the nature of the proceeding,'" Breyer said. "And perhaps more important for present purposes, doing so could make the proceedings less fair overall, increasing the risks of a decision that would erroneously deprive a family of the support i…
/r/MensRights21/06/11 06:05 AM
2

a few requests by old women who didn't like the idea of males that treated patients who weren't doctors. The difference there is that it's the patient saying it and not the "tour guide" who is just making up some arbitrary reason without the denial consent of the patient.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 03:58 PM
1

I have been a nurse for 10 years. I have never heard of anything like this, ever. If someone working under me said that they couldn't be alone in the room with a female patient, I would send them home. my take is that it's not a requirement but a suggestion.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 03:52 PM
12

But he's a boy, he welcomed it and was looking forward to it. /sarcasm except it never works the other way. If it's a male teacher and a female student, it's he lured, manipulated and tricked her into bed.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 05:33 PM
8

Exactly, If a picture of two french fries having sex can be considered "creating a hostile work environment" so can this. Edit: What speech does "Hostile Work Environment" Harrassment Law restrict? political statements, religious proselytizing, legitimate art (such as prints of Francisco de Goya paintings), sexually themed (perhaps not even misogynistic) jokes, and other kinds of speech that are generally seen as being entirely constitutionally protected. *** if there's a rule at his work about …
/r/MensRights06/06/11 11:36 PM
1

Don't be afraid to ask for them to have a male class just because you're female. Unfortunately, you'd probably get more traction asking that the men get one as well.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 05:12 AM
2

These girl are lucky that the mother seems to be rational and does not want to ruin their lives, if the roles were reversed the police would not of hesitated messing up boys life regardless of what the parents had to say. Exactly.. and they would be quick to pursue child pornography charges. This goes beyond being a prank and goes into the sexual harassment/assault category.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 08:07 PM
6

I'd say the radical to moderate ratio in feminists is unhealthy as well. It's just that the sexist card gets thrown out at a lot of MRM thoughts, no matter how moderate.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 06:18 AM
15

Most people don't get (or agree with) the "women behaving badly" posts. I think a lot of people just view it as r/MensRight showing evil things women do. But in reality it's just about showing the world that women are not these innocent creatures and that men are not the only ones capable of being evil and bad. e.g. Some Women beat the S.O's as well as Some Men do. Some Women beat their children as well as Some Men do. Some Women cheat on their partners, just as well as Some Men do. Some Women l…
/r/MensRights03/06/11 06:15 AM
2

That whole post "Seriously, Reddit" is a bunch of BS WTF! She says: Typically, IAMAs are just about overwhelmed with demands for proof, photos, DNA samples, Google satellite imagery, whatever. But this? Oh, it's about a guy who claims to have been wrongfully accused of rape. MEN'S RIGHTS EXTREMIST* WING MOBILISE! I've been going through IAMAs and I don't see many mentions in any post thinking its fake or that proof is needed. Ok, I finally found one. It's about a lawyer who thinks Reddit's view …
/r/MensRights31/05/11 05:28 AM
7

The problem is that some of that is not likely to be abandoned property but property that is sold just to spite the other. There's no problem with selling gifts they receive, but once they cross the line of selling property in spite is where it is problematic. This whole story is a waste of space anyways.. All it is talking about is a Ebay or a Craigslist.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 06:34 AM
2

There seriously needs some gender neutral anti-DV PSA's. Show that it happens on both sides. There's way too many that only show DV as a male beating a female. It totally ignores the fact that women beat men as well. By ignoring this, they are creating a situation which is just making it tougher for men to come out and report DV because it acts as if it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 06:36 PM
2

Looking through youtube, all I see is the woman being abused. I actually found this gem which is even worse. Anyone up for creating a gender neutral DV PSA?
/r/MensRights24/05/11 05:45 PM
1

picked out their own clothes in the boys and girls sections of stores since they were 18 months old They are not picking out clothes at that age. They are just grabbing at anything they can reach. There is no decision making besides. "Hey look! It's something I can grab, Lets grab it and pull on it and throw it to the ground because it'll be funny as hell." Sounds to me, they are going to have major problems later in life raising these kids to do what they damn well please.
/r/MensRights22/05/11 07:12 AM
1

Whether or not it's a case of consent or not, is still up to the courts to decide and not the public opinion. There's rapists that get off free, just as well as there's innocent people being locked up or accused.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 05:58 PM
2

The same can be said for any crime. Edit: The thing that makes rape different is that the accused face a bigger social stigma, whether they are guilty or not. They should be afforded the anonymity until found guilty.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 05:49 PM
2

The happy medium is to just keep both parties anonymous until there is a verdict. If not guilty, then it remains anonymous. If guilty, his/her name becomes public. A lot of them argue that their name must become public to let other victims come out, but that has no bearing in the case at hand. Just because another person comes out and claims the same thing, doesn't make one any more guilty. I'll tell you a story that MacGyver once told. "There was this one kid who would go around and brag that h…
/r/MensRights18/05/11 05:41 PM
2

Long story short, court documents are public records. Then wouldn't the accuser be made public as well?
/r/MensRights18/05/11 04:54 AM
2

I think, is that people have a "right to a public trial", You are always entitled to waive your right. And I think they are misinterpretting the right. I really don't believe it means that the details have to be released to the public, but rather that the public can watch over it and not be held in secret. It's not about the details being made public at all, if it were then the accuser should be made public as well.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 04:53 AM
2

It's because they easily pull out the "If you don't agree with us, You support Rape you bastard rapist!"
/r/MensRights18/05/11 04:50 AM
1

The single mother got 9 months. Her friend got the 15 weeks.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 07:42 AM
2

Well, she'd have to find the money.. Just like men are expected to somehow quit their job, move elsewhere and find a new job. In a perfect world, her ex would at least spring the money up for her move. And chances are anyways is that she's receiving alimony(though I don't know the case)
/r/MensRights14/05/11 06:39 AM
8

I'd tell him to move closer to his kids then, just as I am saying that the mother should move closer to her kids.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 04:40 PM
9

Well, there is nothing stopping her from moving closer. If this was the other way around, people would be just telling the father tough luck and if you want to see them then move closer. There is nothing stopping her. She doesn't have a job, so it's not a matter of being locked into a job.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 04:39 PM
18

In other cases where the woman gets the kids and moves away, they say tough crap to the father and say if he wants to see them then he should move closer. In this case where the father gets the kids, they tell him that he should move closer so the kids can have more time with her. It's a sad case, but maybe the mother should actually move closer then.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 04:34 PM
2

When I was in High School, a couple of guys did the exact same thing for a field trip, in which the normal dress code applied. Guys had to wear pants, while girls could wear skirts. They showed up in skirts. The following year, boys were allowed to wear shorts during the last part of the school year when it was warm.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 06:38 AM
2

It's only because they don't have anything else to charge him on because what he did was not illegal.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 06:16 AM
3

Her list was still distributed by her own actions. Whether it was to 1 or 1 million, it doesn't matter. It's like if you steal 1 candy bar, you are still a thief. You don't need to steal 1 million to be labeled a thief. Age does not matter unless they were naked pictures. If you want to bring up the slander issue. It can be called in both cases and on top of that slander is not a criminal case, but a civil case. "disorderly conduct" is just a trumped up charge because they couldn't find anything…
/r/MensRights12/05/11 06:14 AM
3

The top comment on that page is even worse. Not sure if he is being serious or just trolling. He looks like a deadbeat. I'm glad she did it. Message to deadbeat. Its Mothers Day, because your baby is 8 months old, its your job to make the babys mother feel special once a year on Mothers Day. Here is a good way to avoid the pot next year, wake up early, make her breakfast in bed, flowers, or balloons, and you do alll the chores for the day. If its a nice day outside take her and the baby for a wa…
/r/MensRights10/05/11 06:53 AM
1

The single mom is a photoshop job. What's good to hear is that people there are calling the original "dad" part as equally offensive.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 06:17 PM
2

Makes a good reason to just start your own group and to rub it in their face, admit both males and females. Although, they might not get all the fun stuff at first, but they can always grow and gain people and eventually get the fun stuff like discounts and such.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 07:28 AM
3

There will be no one arguing that. He'd be a monster that deserves to be locked up in prison for the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 05:03 PM
1

walking in a bad area. Streets/sidewalks are built to make walking down the street comfortable and inviting way, just as much as bars and clubs are built to make people(men & women) to visit them in a comfortable way. There's responsible and irresponsible ways to do both. You simply shouldn't walk down a street in a bad part of town just as much as a woman shouldn't go to a bar, get drunk without having someone(sober) with them to watch over them(especially if they plan to wear sexually inviting…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:51 PM
2

Did you even read the article? They are not even comparing a robbery in a simple context to a rape in a simple context. What it is comparing is a mugging where he is robbed, stabbed and left for dead in a situation that he may have controlled with a rape in a similiar situation where it may have been controlled. He described a mugging that occurs from him dressing up in "rich" attire while walking in a bad part of town. He compared it to a rape where the woman gets dressed in revealing clothes, …
/r/MensRights05/05/11 06:06 PM
0

[1] >50% of married persons admit to cheating. Define "Cheating" Some actually considering looking at another person of the opposite sex as cheating.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 08:11 AM
5

Well it is hard to do a 60 Minutes Special when you are dead. But Daniel Pearl was addressed by 60 minutes Pat Tillman was covered extensively and even has a movie This is a non-story in regards to Men's Rights, at least on the way it is being presented. Now if it's presented in a way on how a death of a man is portrayed as opposed to the female reporter being attacked, then you might be onto something.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 06:20 AM
1

He did say that him cheating was most likely what set her off. "In all likelihood " is not stating an example. It is what they think that happened that is only an excuse that a lot will use to justify and illicit sympathy and to divert attention from her. In simpler words, it is victim blaming.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 02:18 AM
3

On the flipside of that, without a proper conviction the accused should remain anonymous until that point. A simple false accusation harms the accused as well has hurt this rape victim because it created doubt in the minds of police.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 01:33 AM
1

I don't hate women. I just hate the inequalities that exist that are worse than the inequalities that a lot of feminists clamor that they suffered. I'd take getting paid less over being able to get falsely imprisoned over a simple whim of a woman bent out to get me over something trivial.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 01:21 AM
1

Which is a good reason he needs to get a lawyer NOW. it will give him better traction when the police arrive by knowing how to deal with it. By no means should he talk to the police on his own accord to try to sway them to not arrest him. That's a recipe to make matters worse
/r/MensRights17/04/11 01:16 AM
2

Well he should call the police and say she is vandalizing his yard and ask them to remove the offending plants. If you annoy them enough they will hopefully tell her to knock it off.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 12:31 AM
1

Well the videotape idea is great.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 12:26 AM
1

I don't think here dating is the problem. It's introducing multiple daddy-replacements to his children. Many children, especially young ones, will view them as such and wonder why they left mommy when they don't come around no more. It could have longlasting effects. Boys may see it as it's proper to be with a girl and then leave and ditch them. Girls may gain a mistrust of boys and think they will always leave them. Not saying it will happen in all cases. I grew up with my mom, who dated a numb…
/r/MensRights14/04/11 12:56 PM
1

Unfortunately there probably is some harm being done here, but it's psychological which courts won't bother with unless it's the father being the bad influence.
/r/MensRights14/04/11 12:45 PM
1

Try Googling "rape statistics alcohol " You might find some stats that say 52% of college females were drinking alcohol at the time of their sexual assault. Or in 2002, 70,000 college females were sexually assaulted while drinking. Alcohol related sexual assaults are not as uncommon as you think they are. I could point them out better, but I'm on vacation in the Philippines using my phone to write this.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 11:32 PM
0

..or your stepmom has more female house painters as friends than male ones. Or where I'm at there's more painters that are male.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 02:42 PM
5

My stepmother is not a house painter :. not all stepmothers are house painters.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 02:30 PM
2

Do you have any stats on the number of rapes that occurred from: person forcing themselves on another person having sex with a drunk person. person goes to party, gets their unwatched drink drugged and then gets raped ? I don't think the alcohol induced rapes are as rare as you think they are.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 12:52 PM
5

Most painters, EMTs and taxi drivers I have seen have been male. I haven't seen enough meter readers. By painters, they are not referring to artists who paint pictures but those who paint buildings. Most I have seen have been male
/r/MensRights11/04/11 12:36 PM
1

I'd say it's to not be quiet about it. If roles were reversed, it would probably not make it to filming without a rewrite to change the genders around because there would be a huge outcry from female groups on how it does such-n-such to women.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 12:29 PM
1

I'm the same, except I don't take the pills. I even take pills(for a medical reason) that are suppose to suppress my immune system and I normally don't get sick. I even eat food without washing my hands after handling money that has been in people's hands buying medicine.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 06:25 PM
3

In a rage, the men leap out of their car, chase her, grab her by the neck and pin her to the wall. This was an experience that drove Vicky Simister to take action and found Anti-Street Harassment UK. That's all good and dandy.. but then there is the little thing that they wrote before that... Just before she reaches the nearest underground station, she's had enough. She strikes the men's car and flees down the station steps. Yup.. she starts the violence and is blaming the violent aspect on the …
/r/MensRights25/03/11 06:09 PM
3

Obama is more focused on expanding women's rights. He feels that women are outnumbered in math and engineering fields. Which while it may be true, it's only because women don't choose those fields. There is nothing stopping them from doing so, except themselves. But although "women have caught up with men in seeking higher education," there were "also reminders of how much work remains to be done," Obama said. In education, there are areas like math and engineering where women are vastly outnumb…
/r/MensRights13/03/11 10:43 AM
3

Well recess gives boys a perfect chance to let out some steam. Now when you curtail recess, you get a bunch of boys that start to fidget and act out in class. Then they "diagnose" them with a disorder and start medicating boys because they aren't fitting in because they are fidgeting and acting out in class.
/r/MensRights13/03/11 10:34 AM
2

Though in Real Life... the women would report the men, cops will come arrest them, courts will convict them and they would have to register as sex offenders.. Movies != Real Life Fake, Staged != Real Life
/r/MensRights11/03/11 08:31 PM
1

I really don't like the benefits package that comes with this privilege.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 09:46 AM
2

You should watch the response when a 30-year-old man says something about Selena Gomez, nowadays or 2 years ago when she was 16.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 06:10 PM
12

White men are underrepresented in terms of what scholarships are available to them. insert ethnicity besides caucasian male and there are staggering odds that they will be able to find a scholarship geared closer to them.
/r/MensRights27/02/11 07:23 AM
12

Please point me to which fallacy that is. If you really think white males haven't been the oppressors in history, then I want to know what history books you read. So if I were robbed by a group of black people, I can hate black people and discriminate against them? What happened in the history has little meaning in today's world in terms of how people should be treated besides not to make the same past mistakes. Yes bad things may have happened, but there's not much we can do about it today. Giv…
/r/MensRights27/02/11 07:18 AM
1

I got to ride in the back of a police car once. They didn't cuff me. It was because someone that thought I was trying to scam them while trying to collect money for a charity.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 07:38 AM
-2

You should have asked "what if she had an axe.?"
/r/MensRights21/02/11 04:10 AM
0

Though this parody is spot on. Jewelry companies always do this kind of stuff, albeit rated pg, but it's what they do. They make men think that the only way we can get a woman is to buy them expensive jewelry and on the same token tells women, that they should demand that men buy them expensive jewlery. Remember, Every kiss begins with K. Though the worst commercial I "heard"(radio ad) was to make men buy some flower bouquet because apparently men cannot write anything eloquent and only knows ho…
/r/MensRights15/02/11 10:36 AM
2

*except STD's. Vasectomies do not protect you against HIV, Herpes, Syphilis or any other STD, unless you already collected them all.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 09:29 AM
1

But whatever happened to his body, his choice?
/r/MensRights15/02/11 09:26 AM
5

Does anyone think #4 can be dangerous? Won't take much for someone from lacing the drink beforehand and act like they are drinking in the hopes that some other person followed #4.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 09:17 AM
0

If it's just a 'nice thing to do', why not do it for other men? Oh right...that won't get you a phone number. So are you saying men only do things for women to get their digits? What kind of thinking is that? As far as doing to be nice, I have no problem with offering the seat to a woman for just being a woman, but I do have a problem giving it to them just because they feel they are entitled to it. It's more of a karma thing. Now if there was an older man that needed a seat as well, I would off…
/r/MensRights12/02/11 07:19 PM
2

You are the one who is fucking dense. I did not start this offshoot in this thread about people carrying kids on a bus. It was started by Katfunk who made the mention about a pregnant person which you expanded to saying that you would let the pregnant lady have a seat, which I did expand as well by aging the kid to be out of the womb including those that are pregnant. If you want to yap at someone about taking this thread to a different direction, why did you choose to expand on Katfunk's commen…
/r/MensRights12/02/11 10:00 AM
-3

You are the one who brought it up. Well technically Katfunk brought it up, and you went along with it. If I saw a man wearing heels I would give him my seat. Wearing heels on the bus/train is tough. Also, If I saw a pregnant man, I would give him my seat too. -Katfunk As for pregnancy - I would give a visibly pregnant woman my seat because carrying an infant in her uterus is a tiring task for a woman, and it's better for her cardiovascular health and the well being of her potential child to not …
/r/MensRights12/02/11 07:56 AM
3

The way I see it. I do think men should offer the seat to the lady, but that is just me and is just a nice thing to do. However, if they are stating that they deserve the seat because they are entitled to it for being a female, they can go pound sand.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 07:47 AM
–

I would give my seat to anyone carrying a child with them, pregnant or after pregnancy(that includes men). I have a son and holding him while standing is a pain beyond belief, especially when he starts to squirm around trying to pull people's hair.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 07:45 AM
1

Title should read "Single Father, who was accused of being a deadbeat, tried to explain that his son lived with him and he couldn't provide for him if his bank account was frozen." The accused of being a deadbeat seemed to be ironed out and he now has his money back and his bank account unfrozen. It was in the article.
/r/MensRights12/02/11 07:42 AM
3

What men cannot celebrate having a baby as well? Since when were baby showers about "congrats on having a fetus in you and carrying it around for 9 months. It's more about congrats on having a new baby and not all that extra stuff that goes along with it. Tip: The mother does not get many gifts for herself, they are normally for the baby. Majority of baby showers are normally thrown for the mother, but why cannot one be thrown for the father as well?
/r/MensRights11/02/11 09:39 AM
4

If it was a man hitting a woman, that would be the case and there would be plenty of people shouting from the rooftops about it. It would make the groupon commercial pale in comparison by a thousand fold. But since it's a woman hitting a man, it's hunky dory, peachy keen.
/r/MensRights08/02/11 08:59 AM
6

Well one stat to keep in mind about that 30% number from DNA testing labs is that most of the samples going through there are from people who aren't sure who the father is. So, you are likely to see a higher number from there, though it does not exclude a higher number outside of that because some people might be completely unaware like Dale Gribble.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 07:06 PM
5

If only I could play the guitar and sing worth a damn.
/r/MensRights06/02/11 08:13 AM
2

I have twenty.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 07:22 PM
13

There's nothing stopping women from accessing the gym when men are there except for maybe their own psyches telling them not to go then. Fair access isn't fair access when you are taking away access from another group. By giving one group a special time, you are taking away time that another group can be using it. Fair Access would require them to also set a day aside for men as well.
/r/MensRights03/02/11 09:23 AM
3

They need to stop nitpicking and stop thinking that everything is describing all women. I'm sure some women like to have guys piss in their mouth just as much as some guys like it when girls piss in theirs. An urinal like this isn't going to make guys think its ok or create a desire to piss in a woman's mouth with or without consent.
/r/MensRights11/01/11 08:39 PM
5

Customers should be allowed to voice their opinions and i'm guessing a lot of those protesters were not even customers, but just people who heard about it and decided to protest it anyways. But the owner has the right to take it down, just as people get the right to protest it.
/r/MensRights11/01/11 08:33 PM
3

Why are they assuming that the killer was from Bristol?
/r/MensRights09/01/11 09:25 PM
2

Mandatory is better... Having it be optional opens up relationship problems because the wife would think the husband does not trust her. If it were mandatory, there would be no blame game except to blame the gov't.. unless it comes out that the child has a different father.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 09:13 AM
1

their parents Key word is parents The issue is that the real parents should support the child... not a "parent" who thinks or thought they were the "parent" Easy fix is that the real parents need to support the child...
/r/MensRights06/01/11 10:25 PM
7

Personally this stuff needs to end.. Easy way about it is that the real father has to pay.. If it is later found out that they are not the father, then they should have the right to disband any further child support payments.
/r/MensRights06/01/11 08:25 AM
5

But if it's very low after hours.. I should be able to take advantage of the same program... It's not like I'm built and buff.. If it's unsafe for a woman out there.. it's just as unsafe for me as well.. Though I don't have to worry about being raped, but I would be a target of a mugging.. shooting or just someone beating the crap out of me for some illogical reason.. If you are going to have this program.. It should be for anyone regardless of sex.
/r/MensRights05/01/11 08:42 AM
13

well she was just mad she got caught.. that is why she divorced him.
/r/MensRights26/12/10 06:16 PM
5

when you a guy gets married, he loses his rights to privacy.. the wife doesn't....
/r/MensRights26/12/10 06:15 PM
17

that's not even cracking..
/r/MensRights26/12/10 06:14 PM
10

That policy ends up with a pile of trash over the rim.
/r/MensRights17/12/10 06:07 PM
4

I'd be opposed to that as well... It's the dying party's wish on how they want their money distributed after death.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 08:27 PM
0

mmm.. a case of blaming the male partner of the relationship for spreading her legs.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 09:15 AM
2

Fleshlight is safe until some neighbor looks through a hole in your curtain...
/r/MensRights24/11/10 07:55 PM
7

Any volunteers want to join and risk being accused of being a pedophile or one who abuses kids?
/r/MensRights25/10/10 11:49 PM
3

The right thing is not to have a female-only or a male-only tournament in a "sport" that both can play effectively amongst each other. Or if you are going to have a female-only tournament, don't cry sexist when a male-only tournament pops up.. That is the right thing..
/r/MensRights25/10/10 10:31 PM
3

Not all cases are the same.. There are plenty of good women out there,, though there is a lot of bad ones too..
/r/MensRights19/10/10 05:54 PM
3

... in year 8 of school.
/r/MensRights14/10/10 05:54 AM
3

I told my ex once to stop, but she didn't.. she exactly gripped herself more onto me and made me cum inside her..
/r/MensRights14/10/10 03:21 AM
2

Of course, but feeding trolls is a hobby of mine I like to partake in once in awhile.
/r/MensRights11/10/10 10:06 AM
1

tamrmint raped me.. I have no evidence and maybe have never been in the same room either, but her reputation should be tarnished and dragged through the mud because I am claiming she raped me.. Do you see how easy that is tamrmint? It doesn't take much to cry rape, which is what this will lead to even if they never even met face to face to begin with.. It's the same thing when a girl cries rape because she consented to sex to begin with but had regrets later.. Don't you see how those situations …
/r/MensRights11/10/10 07:20 AM
2

I don't think the problem was the capacity to evacuate everyone.. it was that people do what they shouldn't do in a emergency and start to panic.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 05:27 PM
2

I suppose a little push to the back might do the job as well... it'll get them down the flight of stairs faster too... but it may take others with them.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 05:25 PM
4

well there is your answer on how to fix the problem.. just point out how well the drill goes and say there is no problem with whatever order the line goes.. it's just that a select few started to panic and you point those out and solve the problem.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 05:22 PM
13

well fast women can go into the passing lane as well.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 05:18 PM
1

"Because we have to wear heels." I don't think that has to do anything with company policy but their own thinking that they have to wear heels to feel serxy and look good..
/r/MensRights09/10/10 05:17 PM
1

I have a cigarette burn from my ex.. I also have a small scar from when she hit me in the shoulder with a heavy motel telephone..
/r/MensRights07/10/10 11:28 PM
1

Reported cases of males being abused are rare.. Not that the actual events are.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 11:27 PM
3

Women already have the option of financial abortion.. it involves either a) abortion or b) giving it up to adoption or even adoption to the father.
/r/MensRights04/10/10 06:48 AM
1

but 25 to 50 cents cheaper
/r/MensRights03/10/10 05:33 PM
21

Anyone know where they live so we can raise a fuss with the DA to press charges? ;) After all, if it was the other way around, that is exactly what would happen if charges were not filed.
/r/MensRights30/09/10 05:30 PM
0

Well the guys are still in trouble and can be convicted and will have to register as a sex offender for having sex with a 15 year old.. The guys were between 20 and 32 years old... Although, I don't think they did much to force or trick her into having sex..
/r/MensRights30/09/10 06:45 AM
7

Because people are using the argument that all prostitutes are not doing it out of their own free will but are being forced into it by human traffickers and they are claiming that young girls are being advertised as well.. The problem is, without them being on insert site X here they'll just find another venue and go deeper into the shadows and back on the street corners. Also, keep in mind this is just something that has been drummed up by politicians to get votes by looking tough on crime..
/r/MensRights25/09/10 08:03 AM
1

If he had any intentions to do anything to her, she wouldn't have had the chance to leave the area beforehand. They were just like two trains travelling on two tracks running by each other in opposite directions.. It may not be comparable to locking up everyone in prison, but it is the same as profiling a black guy walking down the street with a bottle in a brown bag. Or a muslim guy trying to get a one way flight to Denver with only a carry-on.. A) the black guy could have went to the store and…
/r/MensRights22/09/10 06:50 PM
0

California has more to worry about than budgets based upon being male or female.. If the Dream Act goes through, expect a big rush on the state taxpayer funded universities soon.
/r/MensRights21/09/10 06:10 AM
4

and locking everyone up in prison will stop all crime on the streets as well... not that it's a good idea.. There is no reason for this report.. If he was up to anything... he would have tried something.. then it would be something. Should I file a report each time a scary individual(man or woman) walks past me?
/r/MensRights18/09/10 07:00 AM
1

This is NOT Sparta!
/r/MensRights18/09/10 06:55 AM
53

blaming her bi-polarism is just an excuse for her to cheat.. don't buy it..
/r/MensRights16/09/10 06:08 PM
3

The find that ad threatening? Quick pull all male underwear off the shelves.. because they actually show more..
/r/MensRights11/09/10 06:03 PM
6

my guess would be yes.. because the Breast Cancer Awareness folks are big business..
/r/MensRights11/09/10 06:02 PM
5

her breasts got bigger..
/r/MensRights08/09/10 07:18 PM
7

So in a situation where they both work and the wife makes more, she should be robbed blind by the courts..
/r/MensRights05/09/10 05:33 PM
1

once I was being chased by some guy... I ended up t-boning the truck... Cops come. his mom comes... picks up a beer can off the side of the road and shakes it at the cop... The cops were lazy... They wouldn't even deal with the fact that they were chasing us.. and at the end of the report they put "due to conflicting stories,, no fault could be determined" even though there were obvious discrepancies in the other guy's report.. Question 1 answer: "I didn't see the car until he was right on top o…
/r/MensRights03/09/10 09:24 AM
1

so that's the new reason now that the vaccine myth has been debunked?
/r/MensRights03/09/10 08:23 AM
2

That's always good advice..because if the person they went to ended up doing anything to them, you can sue their employer....
/r/MensRights03/09/10 08:11 AM
1

Now what if the girl pokes holes in the condom or makes it easily break and doesn't want to take Plan B?
/r/MensRights03/09/10 08:00 AM
3

Ok so when you end up being involved with a psycho GF who was all nice and sweet to you in the beginning but eventually starts cheating on you with every Tom, Dick and Harry... Beats you with a heavy duty landline phone.. throws a closed can of soda at you.. burns your arm with a cigarette.. punches you with a closed fist over and over again... I'm going to laugh at you.
/r/MensRights03/09/10 05:51 AM
2

Troll is hungry.
/r/MensRights01/09/10 05:16 AM
1

Have a friend (who doesn't know that she is pregnant) punch her in the stomach to temporally solve the problem. You're better off just doing it yourself because in the end, you will be getting into trouble for arraigning the hit to take place.
/r/MensRights01/09/10 05:15 AM
5

you shouldn't be wearing two condoms at the same time to begin with... unless you have a separate appendage to place the second one on...
/r/MensRights01/09/10 05:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter