TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

neilmcc Archive

View 46 posts and 499 comments by neilmcc on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
127

Red Pill Theoryneilmcc/r/TheRedPill16/11/13 09:03 PM
72

Off Topicneilmcc/r/TheRedPill11/12/13 06:21 PM
51

neilmcc/r/MensRights11/02/13 12:31 AM
45

neilmcc/r/MensRights24/12/11 05:40 PM
30

Red Pill Theoryneilmcc/r/TheRedPill24/05/13 02:33 AM
28

neilmcc/r/MensRights07/02/14 01:21 AM
24

neilmcc/r/MensRights19/08/12 08:59 PM
22

MGTOWneilmcc/r/TheRedPill25/07/16 09:22 PM
21

neilmcc/r/MensRights22/10/12 04:48 PM
20

Red Pill Theoryneilmcc/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 03:49 PM
18

neilmcc/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:26 PM
16

neilmcc/r/MensRights14/01/12 10:42 PM
16

neilmcc/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:06 PM
15

neilmcc/r/MensRights23/02/12 04:03 AM
15

Red Pill Theoryneilmcc/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 09:27 AM
14

neilmcc/r/MensRights03/04/12 08:11 PM
12

neilmcc/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:31 PM
12

neilmcc/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:50 PM
12

Red Pill Theoryneilmcc/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 08:21 PM
11

neilmcc/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:54 PM
11

neilmcc/r/MensRights01/08/12 01:04 PM
11

neilmcc/r/MensRights31/10/12 09:25 PM
10

neilmcc/r/MensRights03/04/12 03:15 AM
10

Red Pill Theoryneilmcc/r/TheRedPill20/06/13 10:25 PM
10

neilmcc/r/MensRights19/08/12 04:23 AM
8

neilmcc/r/MensRights07/04/12 12:54 AM
8

neilmcc/r/MensRights25/07/12 05:42 PM
7

neilmcc/r/MensRights26/01/12 05:13 PM
7

neilmcc/r/MensRights16/03/12 10:50 PM
6

neilmcc/r/MensRights07/03/12 01:40 AM
6

neilmcc/r/MensRights06/05/12 08:48 PM
4

Red Pill Theoryneilmcc/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 09:09 PM
4

neilmcc/r/MensRights24/07/12 09:21 PM
3

neilmcc/r/TheRedPill12/05/13 06:41 PM
1

neilmcc/r/MensRights09/05/12 02:39 AM
1

neilmcc/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 05:06 AM
0

Off Topicneilmcc/r/TheRedPill14/06/13 11:22 PM
0

Metaneilmcc/r/TheRedPill08/08/15 04:42 PM
0

neilmcc/r/MensRights08/10/12 09:41 PM
0

Red Pill Theoryneilmcc/r/TheRedPill31/12/14 08:17 PM
0

Scienceneilmcc/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 01:30 PM
0

neilmcc/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:20 PM
0

neilmcc/r/MensRights20/12/11 04:05 PM
0

neilmcc/r/MensRights23/02/13 12:34 AM
0

Red Pill Theoryneilmcc/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 01:45 AM
0

neilmcc/r/MensRights29/09/12 06:54 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Thanks for the feedback. It gave me some thoughts- suppose you carried some lucky charm that you believed would make you more attractive. I think in time you would actually learn and change your habits because you were encouraged to have more experiences. Was it the rabbit foot? Is it the game? I'm exaggerating here. There is good common sense stuff here but I think it really oversells itself. What I want to say is letting your latent nature out is infinitely more valuable but I don't see it as …
/r/TheRedPill26/07/16 12:26 AM
13

Milo, do you think the culture in silicon valley is a big threat to tainting the web? The bay area is full of leftist activists with a lot of time on their hands and seem strangely effective at enforcing consensus, as in the case of getting Mozilla's founder fired because he was pro-trad marriage. And how do you factor in the temptation of cheap H1B labor to the various tech giants? What's going on here? Why are the tech giants seem always on board with the latest progressive trends?
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 06:18 PM
0

On the off chance anyone sees this before it gets buried lol...more group dynamics stuff is over at my sub WhiteMasculinity.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 03:55 PM
1

The point on patterns is good stuff, OP. One thing though- sometimes with writing less is more.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 03:54 PM
-1

Did you read my post? It isn't controversial a bit.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/15 05:46 PM
-1

(you say "healthy masculine expression") What I meant by this is that a believer in "gender" would see Krocs change as an example of the mutability of sex. The truth is, in the absence of actual ability to be masculine, men tend to be attracted to a sort of caricature of manliness and his cross dressing is just another extreme form of psychology, nothing else. In other words, it is all biology but gender theory assumes a blank slate of human nature. you sound like an old feminist academic trying…
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 04:49 PM
-1

Gender has come to be a loaded term meaning a socially constructed state imposed on men or women, for example a women in traditional marriage. Many go as far as to say sex has no bearing on the "gender" which is entirely a product of environmental pressure. What needs to be pointed out is how hypermasculine/hyperfeminine behaviors are inversely proportional to how free men and women are able to be themselves. This is obvious in the rise of body builders and is culminating in people seriously ent…
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 04:03 PM
-3

I didn't do that. He is abnormal but the facts are plenty of "normal" people idolize body builders and plenty of normal people feel transgender is normal.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 03:55 PM
1

Libido Dominandi by E. Micheal Jones is exactly the book you want.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 03:46 PM
1

There is something much more insidious about today's soft-communism and many other historical variables that make Russia and the west difficult to draw parallels.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 11:18 PM
6

Essentially, the only meaning to human life is to keep human life existent. If we isolate a single variable, call it sexiness, the present arrangement is wholly unsexy if birth rates are any indicator. Everyone knows how to have sex, even most animals manage it with little problem. Where that answer is wanting is not the what but the how and why. How do we want to survive? As men or as mere chattel? You might say the TRP is the very crystallization of individualist society and the status quo. As…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 11:12 PM
3

Machiavelli was simply describing the political animal in man, I think it is a misnomer (and act of self-flattery) to call narcissism and hedonism Machiavellian because there isn't really any real politics involved in getting laid. I doubt a real political movement even exists in America, it has been reduced into a sort of corporate managerial bureaucracy. A computer system can be entirely logical and execute commands without any errors but serve no purpose and this is the danger philosophical w…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 09:55 PM
3

If its any consolation I don't understand Foucault either. ;)
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 09:45 PM
1

They are now both competely divorced from the old ideologies. I agree somewhat but it was very cosmetic rejection of Communism. They still face the same problems as here because they are eternal, e.g., the impulses of masculinity against finance and ideology. I don't like philosophy or DE because it is cordoned off in many respects. What I'm saying is trying to fulfill the impulse of TRP which is organic, hence its popularity.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 09:41 PM
2

Thanks for the sympathy. I do believe there is a slant and embracing of the status quo via omission. This is always the case when something claims to be neutral- and there is nothing neutral about reducing man to a strategy (or anything controversial for that matter). As a side, isn't 'enjoying the collapse/decline' reduce one to a spectator? I haven't read any sort of defense or reasoning for this assumption.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 09:06 PM
1

Morality exists because it is not supposed to be easy. Rampant murder and theft isn't an issue presently but if it were, I'd hope we'd have the strength to still question it on moral grounds. Moreover, "those embracing morality" would prove the most resilient to calamity. Can social matters can be described through economic principles or as in ascent or decline? Perhaps in a metaphorical sense you've painted a historical trend but it isn't reality. In other words, if things can be made to appear…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/15 02:32 AM
13

How can you blame young women getting raised in such a toxic environment? The west abandoned its traditions because it was infiltrated by hostile elites that want to bleed us dry. It is good that women act out because they are the canaries in the coal mine. Just on practical grounds, I don't see how ideas like saying it is women's fault is productive (I leave shaming to the ones who enforce morality and good sense which should, and only effectively could, be educators, family [particularly mothe…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/14 06:01 AM
3

Is an alpha one who can't even speak his mind openly?
/r/TheRedPill27/11/14 11:07 AM
3

Haha...right. All non-Lenapes must be removed!
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:52 AM
2

Who lived in those neighborhoods before they became majority non-White? LOL
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:31 AM
1

The submitted article is a radically anti-White SJW perspective.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:28 AM
7

Low carb diet disrupt hormones by sending adrenaline and cortisol through the roof. It is why low-carbers are insufferable zealots for their oil cult.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 09:37 PM
9

Lipolysis is a short-term life saving adaptive response, not a way to improve hormone profiles.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 09:33 PM
16

carbs have next to no use in the body You realize fat and protein are converted into glucose before they are utilized by cells for energy? And carbohydrates are the most efficient way to create glucose. "theres no biological reason to exceed" 100-200g, still about 2-4 cups of white rice, unless you are getting heavy exercise which happens to be the single best way to raise testosterone. And the guys who have the most muscle and highest testosterone eat massive amounts of carbs to get there. I wo…
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 07:23 PM
27

I bet you like to spin meat.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 05:29 PM
17

less carbs(eliminate them completely if you can) DYEL Sleep more Good luck doing that with your jacked up cortisol levels.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 05:28 PM
-3

You're making some highly unlikely assumptions: That television and radio are not heavily regulated by long captured bureaucracies, unlike pizza shops. Secondly, assuming the media is unaffected by outside influences (most apparent is via ad money) and has no ideological agenda outside of getting the most viewers. Thirdly, that the media is limited to saying what people want to hear and is incapable of shaping people's wants and beliefs through repeated exposure and other propagandizing techniqu…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 03:49 AM
-3

tend to have major problems with TRP's general type of community. It is indeed in their nature but they do not call the shots. Your claim that they "control" the media is just not substantiated. IF we are going to ask which identifiable group controls the largest share of the media, it is Jewish men. This is a confirmable fact, 2, unlike your assertion that women do.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 03:05 AM
1

Feminists may also note that the sky is blue.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 05:58 AM
1

"the village" provides them with built in social assistance for their bastard children. Hence, the village (in the pre-nanny state definition) policing women's sexual behavior because the village doesn't want to deal with the fall-out. It is easier to escape guilt and shame when everyone is alienated from one another. social engineers are actively working against suburbia Are you we not using the same definitions? "Suburbia" here means intentionally designed areas designed with segregated zoning…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 05:50 AM
0

What exactly is feminist here?
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 12:23 AM
2

Less than 20% white. In fact, German is the official language spoken by government officials and the majority of the urban populace. No, it is not. South Africa is not all of Africa Where statistics are available, the picture is equally disturbing. http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/an-african-iceberg.aspx?pageID=449&nID=47710&NewsCatID=418
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:12 PM
2

You forgot to mention that the boy was half-Chinese which makes the claim even more irrelevant.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:10 AM
4

Black men commit roughly 35% of all reported rapes despite being 6.5% of the population. Want more? Interracial crime: There were an average of 15,400 black-on-white rapes every year...By contrast, there were only 900 “white”-on-black rapes every year...blacks committed 85 percent and “whites” 15 percent. Source Feminists should also be alarmed about the casual attitude toward rape in Africa. These facts are "racist" (feel free to downvote, I'm sure something here will trigger offense) while con…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:58 AM
6

women are “acted upon” and men “actors.” This is where the trp and feminists agree.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 11:48 PM
2

Similarly, European women glomming leftist rhetoric are following instinctual urges to challenge their men. Soon, breakthroughs in psychology will overtake the pseudo-scientific Marxist and deconstructionist social sciences which suppose men and women of all races can be reasoned with in order to accept liberal values and which put primacy on language/reason as a means of conveying meaning and morality. As a side, this is why racist witch hunts will become the norm: reasoning that all men are eq…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 03:07 AM
2

Glad you're both getting behind racial stereotypes.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 06:00 PM
-1

You're mistaken. There is no description of inherent conflict between individuals based on race here. Choosing to use an exclusively micro view doesn't mean the macro view is insignificant sociopolitically. If that doesn't interest you personally, then that is your prerogative.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 05:49 PM
1

Your mockery of human biodiversity will surely get you off the hook for your misogynistic recognition of sexual differences!
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 04:22 AM
0

That was fun.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 02:49 AM
28

Or he could simply tell her to not act like a bitch because passive aggressiveness is for bitches.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 07:37 PM
12

Bit like communism.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 12:51 AM
2

More here.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/14 04:45 PM
1

muh cereal
/r/MensRights24/01/14 07:22 PM
13

Feminism isn't a disinterested social science. It is a psychosexual game. You don't get points for being right.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/14 08:49 PM
1

You can certainly blame him for accepting it, however, it doesn't make her any less despicable. You'll go blue trying to explain to people that these aren't mutually exclusive concepts. 'Victim blamer' sounds like a bad word so they just grip onto it I guess.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 10:09 PM
1

What would you tell a rabbit that wanders out into an open field?
/r/MensRights23/12/13 10:04 PM
4

Both of them need 'treatment.' The act of trying to classify her behavior in line with a positive norm ('helping you to understand') is the behavior of someone who is 'prey.' Could he have walked away before anything happened? Absolutely. The predator likes those who do not have a sense of how they expect others to treat them. Predatory behavior only happens in places where the predator has power.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 04:24 AM
-1

Get that Obamacare, young man. Gotta pay for the bureaucracy.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 03:23 AM
1

Fascinating.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:20 AM
1

the injection coats the walls of the vas with a clear gel made of 60 mg of the copolymer styrene/maleic anhydride (SMA) with 120 µl of the solvent dimethyl sulfoxide. The copolymer is made by irradiation of the two monomers with a dose of 0.2 to 0.24 megarad for every 40 g of copolymer and a dose rate of 30 to 40 rad/s.[4] The source of irradiation is cobalt-60 gamma radiation. Radioactive plastic in your vas...Did feminists invent this?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:14 AM
6

I feel bad for them. They would be much happier living with their own people.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 02:59 AM
5

Today's divorce rates haven't been the norm in history. As far as odds go, do not confuse the statistics of a population with the odds of an individual. The latter is entirely based on the physiological composition and environmental context of the individual.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/13 10:08 AM
4

Nice summary. Today it is the quick dopamine fix, not just in our porn sex. Cell phones are just as much an obstalce as feminism when it comes to connecting with a woman. In the original book on Karezza, the ideal man was 'magnetic' for lulling women what they referred to as 'heaven.' I don't see PUA methods (or our modern 'masculinity) as lending toward a magnetic presence, nor do you see women (even in LTR) dialed into their phones and other such nonsense as being able to participate. Seems mo…
/r/TheRedPill20/11/13 09:55 AM
1

Woman with Jesus complex has forgiven men of their sins. Goodness isn't state found in mastering disciplines or being virtuous- it comes from the priestesses of feminism ordained by the good manginas project.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:10 PM
5

It's telling when every sentence begins with "I've." Men are good enough- a narcissist said so.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:56 PM
0

Right wing talking point. (Why are leftists so creepy?)
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:38 PM
2

The mandate is for employers to cover contraceptives. Someone who is employed (and responsibly married) doesn't need welfare.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:36 PM
2

I doubt if I perceive anything the same as others. Too vague.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 06:49 AM
0

Why can't I apologize for women? They're mislead and lied to by the "authority" (culture) and if you really are RP'd, you'd know the significance of "authority" for them. This leaves me with plenty of room for compassion for women.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 06:46 AM
3

you are terrified of being pussyless. So it's not men's loyal nature? It's not the shame of abandoning someone who is attached to you? Women who are calculating and so fear addled that they only think with their tingles have learned this behavior. They are traumatized because society has promised them that there are no men for them. Stop portraying women and men as soulless beings guided by their genitals. It's just playing into the narrative.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 02:09 AM
1

She doesn't love you. If love doesn't exist, how (or why) do you make such a distinction?
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 01:31 AM
1

Nowhere did I argue for the non-danger of concussions but your data is just establishing a fact I didn't and wouldn't argue against. You're making textbook straw-man argument:e misrepresenting what I'm saying and then countering an argument I didn't make. I'm fine with kiddy football and soccer Concussions happen in both. The most obvious question is just how dangerous MMA is relative to either but you never bothered to address that. The article is likewise disingenuous- using dramatized photos …
/r/MensRights09/11/13 11:20 PM
1

Find me a study that says concussions don't harm the brain and I'll be on your side. What's this about straw-manning again? Precious. Until then, you're wrong You're framing the argument like I'm advocating for the safety of concussions. My point is, you and the article even offer to entertain the possibility of looking at the actual risks. Or are we assuming that life must carry 0 risk at all times and we should ignore the fact that all sports also have risk of injury? Instead we get some sensa…
/r/MensRights09/11/13 08:20 AM
1

All contact sports have risks. This sport is bad though because boys like it. It's a medical fact And not relevant to the conversation which is the risk in this particular sport because all sports carry that risk. Which you and the article didn't bother to cite. Anything vaguely resembling that "evil male aggression" is de facto bad.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 06:40 PM
1

No, you're jumping on the feminized media's hysteria without any facts. It is sensationalist.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:16 PM
0

And a man never chooses a woman that pleases him? Sexual value certainly appears to be a fact of nature, but the same rules apply to women. Men could certainly push their standards in society and in their personal relationships, but this amounts to slut shaming/women hating and whatever else in the eyes of acceptable society.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:53 PM
0

Men largely form society and the relationship between men and thus how women relate and view the men around them. How does that factor into your theory?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:13 PM
1

Should sports that young men really enjoy and are naturally important to their development continue to be shoved to the fringes? You do boys a disservice by promoting this sort of anti-boy sensationalism. I'd question the judgment of the sheltered, often urban men, who cannot relate to these sports. They want to shelter boys from the lessons of nature. This is a projection of their own mollycoddling they received and as a result they have a fear of masculinity.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:09 PM
1

I'm not sorry about my sloppy writing because you could have simply asked me to clarify.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 02:22 AM
1

You're giving this a lot of fucks.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:48 PM
3

Yes, I meant the peer group found in classrooms segregated by age. High schoolers are experts in finding diversions to pass by their boredom and inane pop culture- not a group that would help young men succeed in matters of life like learning to work and participate in politics that you would be exposed to working with adults. Of course, learning about the world from men might mean learning some real truths about men's stake in politics, which would interfere with the transmission of feminist id…
/r/MensRights31/10/13 09:10 PM
24

When girls compare themselves to men, they are also harmed. Girls should be encouraged to embrace their nature, not behave like second rate boys.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:29 PM
11

Teenage boys should be working jobs, ideally around older men, not sitting in a classroom. It's a great lie to suppose surrounding yourself with your peers is important to development. Humans are social learners, there is nothing you can learn from people who have the same levels of experience as yourself.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:27 PM
14

The MRM shouldn't be concerned with boys competing collectively with girls (GPA is meaningless)- they should be concerned with the way in which schooling causes long term harm in a man's ability to see himself as someone who can manifest his will. Learned helplessness is the pandemic afflicting young men. Men in the West need support to disengage this system before it reaches the levels found in Japan. This means a platform which encourages employment among young men (rejecting mass immigration …
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:23 PM
-2

You act as if feminism hasn't been attacking sex differences and family roles since it's inception. It's so far engrained that the MRM attacks traditional roles (traditional conservatives is used as a pejorative here) as well when it seems wholly unnecessary. Marriage needs to be changed so that men can benefit from that role, not because somebody wants to avoid that role (which there only exists an imaginary social pressure, rather than the actual legal consequences in marriage).
/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:58 PM
1

It is attacked by feminism and the left- doesn't it seem a bit intolerant by them in particular?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:55 PM
-2

What if some people want to live life where women stay in the kitchen and men 'man up'? Should they be tolerated?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 06:34 PM
4

homophobic racism gasp
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:06 PM
3

Don't give into his shaming language and try to act tough. Men are allowed to be huge pussies now.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 12:56 AM
0

Supposing women do not posses an instinct for attachment, humans are social by their nature. "Social construct" is leftist baloney.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 03:52 PM
2

Monogamy is a social construct What a bunch of horseshit.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 03:53 AM
5

The lezebel article is jealousy masked in feminist vitriol- it is pitiful but hilarious. It's obvious the guy has alpha bonafides (“You’ve been up for 15 minutes and you haven’t made me a sandwich?”). Feminism becomes much more understandable when you understand tantrums as jealousy. The author has never met a man she'd make sandwiches for and it drives her crazy that she keeps scaring away real men with her hysteria.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/13 12:02 AM
10

I know it's tempting to try to make this PC ("she's doing it for herself!"), but why not let it rest on her doing it for her man? Today it is acceptable to justify a woman's behavior as long as she's 'doing it for herself,' like dropping her kids off with some stranger while she works on the hypergamy simulator known as the corporate ladder. I can understand your temptation having been indoctrinated in PC land to do this but it's wholly unnecessary and probably inaccurate if we just accept her w…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/13 11:56 PM
-10

The MRM is going to become an arm of the feminist establishment because it believes in the social justice form of equality. It will purport to speak for men but it will only further undermine masculinity.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:15 PM
-13

Are you familiar with sexual conduct rules in universities?
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:13 PM
-6

College 'sexual conduct' rules are absurd and anti-man and these sort of programs feed into false accusations. Reddit sees an imgur link and their brain shuts off. Nobody thinks contextually and questions what the organizations behind those posters are about.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:12 PM
-9

Now even men can rationalize their stupid choices by accusing someone of rape. Feels equality, man.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 03:55 PM
2

Jumping from bourbon to low carb at your age is a recipe for stress. Switch to a glass of red wine every-night and cut out the vegetable oils. Slowly incorporate light exercise to build muscle mass. Get regular massages and try to smile more. Moderation and lowering stress is key.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 11:59 PM
37

He is for offering a positive view of men, not saying anything negative about women. Since you ignored him then re-framed his point it to something completely unrelated, you seem to be pushing an agenda as well by promoting your own, irrelevant views. It's an easy fallacy to make because in politically correct land, gender isn't allowed to matter unless it's an opportunity to promote girl power.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 09:36 PM
-2

You think a child's development can be limited to political slogans about tolerance and the like?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 10:40 PM
-1

Nice projection. There's something wrong with my behavior, not yours, right? I'm willing to at least say, yes, I do have values not shared by everyone but then, you're incapable of at least respecting that fact. You want your way to be the way. All in the name of tolerance? Homosexual behavior is being encouraged everywhere, it's not just PDA. It's really unfair to those kids who aren't capable of being exposed to that without ensuing confusion and discomfort, who knows what else.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:52 PM
20

Men expecting women to behave like adults created feminism.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/13 08:26 PM
-3

Oh noes, you're being oppressed. But seriously, I don't like a culture that must bring sexuality into every male interaction. I really pity the younger generation as they are being force fed this disgust more and more. that's too fucking bad. If you'd take off your gay indignation glasses off for a second you can start to try to understand heterosexuals do have valid reasons for not wanting to have to deal with the same problems homosexuals can have dealing with other men.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:33 PM
-2

Men and women can't 'just be friends' for a reason. Discouraging sexuality between same sexes gives space and prevents discomfort in pursuing friendship as one's motives aren't always in question.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:01 AM
6

That's your problem if you do. Ah, the famous progressive "tolerance."
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:49 AM
6

In any form of class warfare, especially in context of a liberal democracy, there is a host and parasite. What white men need to realize is that there is no other group to leech off. The parasitism is the problem for men. They are the host. Joining the chorus of victims goes against both nature and political reality.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 11:56 PM
0

The only reason I emphasize white men is because feminism started in the west. In addition, feminism is aligned with other racial groups through intersectionalism. But yes, any man under our law and milieu is also injured by feminism.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 11:53 PM
22

Feminism is a protracted shit test against western white males. The degradation of sexual norms, men forfeiting immense amounts of their power found men and women alienated from one another in a historically unprecedented way. Industrialization, a welfare state, biased family courts and technology offers women unprecedented resources without actually having to submit to men. This combined with the hypergamous nature of women has ensured that the average and below average man are completely invis…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 09:46 PM
-1

Do you really need everything spelled out for you?
/r/TheRedPill15/06/13 12:15 AM
-1

What does my comment have to do with traditionalism?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 06:03 PM
1

Asking for punishment for the girl misses the point. Dismantle the inherently anti-male schooling system. The preference for females is a built in feature of schooling.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:07 AM
-22

Begging for money is so unmanly you strap on Sci Fi weapons? Why not lobby the gubmint for monies? Oh, that's right. Because socialism is inherently anti-male and without stressed out chumps (a major precursor for disease) to work their asses off to pay for their own demise.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 06:55 AM
1

What does it mean to 'act like you love her'? To be her bitch boy? Loving a woman means being a man IMO. If he behaves like a man he is giving more love (what 'being a man' means deserves more explanation obviously, perhaps other commenters will point him in the right direction.) I realize this is just semantics but I feel like you're trying to express ideas using the language of the establishment which is confusing and ultimately self-defeating.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/13 11:02 PM
3

What about the real-dad?
/r/TheRedPill04/06/13 02:32 AM
4

a really powerful engine for female desires is being desired, is being wanted Wanted by alphas, sure.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/13 12:27 AM
7

What is it that makes your marriage worthwhile? What worries you the most?
/r/TheRedPill31/05/13 03:52 AM
1

I guess the Islamic conflict with the west isn't within your purview.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/13 01:08 AM
1

Decorum and duty is pretty well gone. This would be unthinkable a couple generations ago. There is a connection.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 03:29 PM
2

A real alpha is the one that defines and leads social gatherings. You're starting from scratch and there's a lot of road blocks ahead in creating your own social life if you dont want it to revolve around pre-designed rituals made to make distilleries and clubs rich. Participating in the process of creating your own path means you're already beginning to assume for yourself role of alpha. Random sex leaves the self spent, not stronger. Building real meaningful relationships is a better use of ti…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/13 09:16 PM
6

Lesbians are second rate men. They jelly.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 07:14 PM
-4

passive femininity and passive aggressiveness Passive, feminine women do not cheat. This article does outline a very predatory mindset, but predatory behavior only exists in conditions where it is enabled and encouraged. You can't do much about our sick, feminist society but you can become assertive and masculine.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:36 PM
1

No, random protests.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 06:29 PM
2

That's not very relevant, is it?
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 02:58 AM
3

Are you a liberal?
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 02:02 AM
5

Feminism is a protracted shit test.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 03:08 AM
5

The protests are about various liberal causes. The aimlessness and vapidness seems to be add to the fact that it isn't about the causes themselves, but their deep seated hysteria and insecurity. Women are drawn to authority. This is a manifestation of that drive.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 03:06 AM
2

Well, I suppose you have your mind made up but I think there is more than what meets the eye in these photos.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 12:12 AM
2

You know what a shit test is, correct?
/r/TheRedPill12/05/13 11:56 PM
-31

Feminism invented image obsessed women, here's why: Regular healthy meals provided by housewives (bless their souls) ensured children had healthy metabolisms and eating habits. With a breakdown of sexual norms, image becomes even more important as minor flaws and aging college honeys start to lose their tight little bundas but with the expectation to continue putting out to be 'empowered.' If my sexual value began plummeting after age 21 or so I'd probably engage in a bit hamster rationalization…
/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:31 PM
36

Sarah Jane will receive her Ph.D. in sociology in the fall of 2011 from Vanderbilt University, where she also earned her M.A. A native of California, she holds a B.A. in women’s studies from the University of California, Los Angeles. "Now let me tell you about work."
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:44 PM
15

Anonymity won't fix the issues of VAWA.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:55 PM
1

I wouldn't really label them anti-feminist at that point.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:46 AM
-5

I'm well aware of the stupid double bind they've made up. 'Feminism is bad but so are normal relationships.' themountaingoat: 'feminism is bad but when women reject feminism, that's bad too.' Enjoy your hand.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 11:33 PM
-8

The converse of that means feminism results in women taking care of themselves and doing heavy lifting. If women were concerned with maximizing materially they would be feminists. Heavy lifting and provisioning are smaller representations of wanting to be cared for and in turn, care for men. You've been reading too much AVFM.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 10:55 PM
5

Is he going to be like everyone else because he is no longer called a "mutant"? Would anyone see him as equal? It's pushing this false belief that all people are equal or that by identifying these things people are somehow less "separate." His solution is that people should be judged by their actions- well, I doubt if anyone that isn't a mutant will ever have super powers to act with. So what is the point of it all beyond trying to police what people are allowed to talk about? E.g., this stance …
/r/MensRights29/03/13 08:25 AM
8

Losing the victim olympics is actually winning. Mutants are the bringers of order and justice. There can be no equality unless he were to never use his powers again so this is in fact a dishonest act on the part of the author because he'll never be normal. Perhaps they would institute some sort of handicapper general to make sure this could be enforced. If anything, having white men lowering themselves to the weakest common denominator is exactly the problem men are having to deal with and which…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:39 AM
1

Standing up for (read: whining) your inability to hear things that offend you doesn't count.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 12:50 AM
1

The bible says things that would offend many gays, women, non-Christians, etc. Stand for something, you pathetic wuss.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:45 PM
6

What entitles you to not be offended? Certainly many feminists would be offended here. Either we affirm the idea of letting people speak their mind or we don't. http://arts.uwaterloo.ca/~kwesthue/regiftedxmas12.html
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:36 PM
6

You should realize women aren't feminists and they shouldnt be used interchangeably. Also realize what a woman says she wants (usually repeating cliches she hears in the feminist media) and really wants are two different things.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:07 PM
3

People who throw a fit whenever they're offended aren't welcome here.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 08:57 PM
7

What are your thoughts on the Free State Project?
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:53 PM
-4

Well, stagnant wages may have something to do with the ever devaluing USD since leaving the gold standard to pay the wonderful folks running this country into the ground. But no, somehow the crux of the matter has to do with instituting a price floor which have historically done nothing but result in higher unemployment for unskilled workers...progressive logic!
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:58 AM
2

Friedman on minimum wage would also be valuable. It would just result in higher unemployment.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 03:22 AM
-6

We did it, Reddit! DAE faith in humanity?
/r/MensRights05/03/13 02:48 AM
1

The state is anti-man. End the state.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 11:20 PM
6

Teachers do not educate, they school in an abusive (under threat of violence) manner. They turn young children into authoritarians. I would not pay anyone to abuse children.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 02:18 AM
5

Sounds like something a feminist would say.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 02:09 AM
3

Do you take issue with Israel's ethno-nationalist policies?
/r/TheRedPill25/02/13 07:56 PM
2

Is the act of overcoming modernism and feminism strengthening the masculine, socially and biologically? Masculinity doesn't diminish but grows stronger against it's antithesis. "for a tree to grow tall it must put down hard roots in hard rock."
/r/TheRedPill25/02/13 04:47 AM
15

The one thing a victim hates is to see an even bigger victim (that's why boot-licking of leftist interests the MHRM takes will never bear any fruit). Women see the supplicating gamma male as a threat to their own existence in terms of resources and as a sexual threat (creeps). Hence the gamma may begin to emphasize their feminine qualities and expresses their hate for the masculine so as to ensure they will be accepted into the sisterhood (pats on the head). The leftist strain in MRM, by becomin…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/13 04:23 AM
0

RTA
/r/MensRights23/02/13 01:35 AM
3

Thanks for the feedback.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 08:19 PM
2

He agrees with a lot of feminist doctrine. Much of his work is gold. But I'd like to know why he would label boys who are competitive 'fearful' and so on. That men go on to take on risky jobs (and high rewards), this also we're told men shouldn't feel. Already our culture is inundated with this anti-masculinity neurosis where competitiveness, assertiveness and so on are made out to be anti-social. He paints masculinity (his caricature of machoism) as a result of socialization. Raising boys to be…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:51 PM
1

What would your dad say to such talk?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:50 AM
7

It's never easy to get depressed if you are brave. Save the unhappiness for when you're too sick to keep fighting.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:19 AM
5

Youth sports, big brother/big sister organizations, YMCA, churches... And as said above, it's true membership has plummeted for fraternal orders but they do still exist in some form. Like Free masons, Elks club, Kiwanis. You'll meet some old school guys and often professionals join them to network. These clubs lack young blood to pass the torches to and you'll be warmly welcomed. Check your paper for clubs.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:09 AM
2

The debate is completely missing the point so I'm stating it like it is.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 01:01 AM
12

Don't wait for one to be created because these organizations already exist but often fly under the radar.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 11:50 PM
-2

Women should go be blown apart for Israel and the military industrial complex just like men are.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 10:20 PM
10

There has been a growing internet movement of "men's rights" activists, Pick up artists and others who call themselves "the Manosphere." While it's still small it has changed the way hateful ideologies function...In the underbelly of the internet, what can only be called a new misogyny has emerged • "will typically try, not to answer opponents with better arguments, but to silence them completely as ‘hateful’, ‘intolerant’, ‘bigoted’, ‘misogynistic’, ‘homophobic’, etc."; http://www.dailykos.com …
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:06 PM
3

I wonder who will bail them out.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 06:59 PM
2

I didn't know we were in a competition.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 11:13 PM
4

America is 29582% minority when you add them all up.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 11:12 PM
16

we can't get a council for men and boys established You think government can solve problems given it's track record? Government is the problem. This problem needs to be solved through civil actions and by getting government out of making winners and losers.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 10:30 AM
20

I don't think you're using 'good faith' in the right way. I'm not being underhanded. You're being evasive and indirect, as are many of your comments. It's a very common debate tactic by feminists as well.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:37 AM
14

With a dodge of that caliber, I'd say /r/feminism needs to appoint you head mod.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:21 AM
5

I'm trying to understand why some people feel so enamored with the term.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 08:55 AM
-4

I'm sure a a nice, tolerant guy like him didn't mean it when he said "the world is better with you" because I teased him. I do forgive him. I'm sure he's a wonderful human being.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 08:43 AM
12

Sorry, I wanted to ask why do consider yourself a feminist?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 08:33 AM
2

He also used the minimum wage myth. This country is very much economically ignorant which is a shame since we depend on the market so much.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 08:11 AM
-11

Harsh words from someone so tolerant and progressive.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 08:07 AM
-20

Baby's first leftist rant.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 07:51 AM
4

Why would you "identify" with feminism?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 07:49 AM
10

i am needed like Africa the middle east Hahaha...
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:49 AM
1

This guy acts like he's the first one to discover yellow journalism. The fact that the west is becoming more and more illiterate isn't really news either.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 11:11 PM
1

Feminism is giving women opportunities at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:09 PM
1

Pick any criteria. Take some skill you have at your job or school. Well, I doubt our abilities are the same, in fact no two people are the same. Now tell me the sense of trying to say the two sexes are the same. There is nothing wrong with having equal treatment. Pretending just anyone can have the same careers or abilities as a matter of guiding policy, and to the point of what we're allowed to talk about is unnatural and stupid.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 08:58 PM
-6

Standards are completely relative. I don't care what or who you are, equality is simply a lie.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:57 AM
-6

When will you morons realize leftism is anti-man?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 09:49 PM
7

When economic Marxism turned out to complete bull shit.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 05:47 PM
23

The woman behind this show is the creator of the Obama ad where she likens voting to sexual intercourse. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6G3nwhPuR4
/r/MensRights05/02/13 02:16 AM
19

Those are some hard hitting questions. Shit man.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 11:43 PM
32

Ask her why women aren't rising in engineering fields, scientific fields, computer science and especially the most dangerous jobs (waste collection, water treatment, manual labor, oil drilling, mining, agriculture, etc).
/r/MensRights28/01/13 11:41 PM
3

*Biology under the influence of alcohol.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 11:39 PM
0

Societal problems are much deeper than punishing bad guys. It doesn't change the root problem which is the disintegrating community and family.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:44 PM
6

You think we'd all be better people if our youthful mistakes were put on youtube and bombarded with harassment? Come on.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:40 PM
4

True. But doesn't it seem to lend itself nicely to the shoot first, questions later mentality? And shouldn't it be the parents place to raise their kids? It doesn't seem surprising at all that the mother wouldn't want others to interfere.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:00 PM
-1

No room for innocence in our age, I guess. These kids came into a fucked up world. It's not their fault, it's the fault of the adults who taught them the wrong things. I'm willing to bet money that the mom here is a single mother.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 10:29 PM
12

Mob justice sure worked for those kids who we hear getting killed over false rape accusations. I guess you missed that essay on mobbing.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 10:25 PM
1

You're asking for logic in naming a movement that eschews logic. tl;dr white male privilege
/r/MensRights21/01/13 11:14 PM
3

The bedrock of any meaningful relationship.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 07:13 PM
5

Putting your adrenals on max volume is simply biological stress. But I guess passing tests and learning to be a good little stooge is more important than your health.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 06:31 PM
5

How can you read into my comment to see 'hate' for women? Come on. My point is it's prohibited to be realistic about biology b/c it is chauvinist. It pervades our culture. 'Feminist sob story' was probably a sloppy description. From what she says only her father warns her while society is telling her on different levels to trade up and be independent, etc. Just look at any sort of TV drama or woman's magazine where serial monogamy is the standard presentation of any lifestyle. This is 'empowerme…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:58 PM
5

They only modeled it after Marxist dialectic to create the 'war of the sexes.' Breaking traditional structures would create a larger labor force and a need for the marketing of childcare and so on. Whether that was their intent seems immaterial because the result lends itself so well into the 'have it all mentality.' What else could have it resulted in?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:48 PM
4

The 'have it all' business would seem to be an inevitable result of denial of biology. The victim dynamic would also seem lend itself nicely to this 'narcissistic' and 'market friendly' feminism. Feminism has been 'market friendly' from the get go. The fact that it's completely compatible if not inevitable makes whatever protestations some feminists may have pointless if not self-contradictory.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:36 PM
5

I have no friggin clue what that's supposed to mean. Some weird variation of NAFALT? Feminists have been staunch denialists of sexual dimorphism, making the pointing out of realities of child rearing and biology tantamount to a hate crime. Today we have desperate older women spending thousands of dollars on fertility treatment and egg donors because they were never given the harsh truth. So no, academic feminism has been behind this completely.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:17 PM
2

There's stories like this is all over huffpost, atlantic and the other usual outlets for feminist sob stories. This has to do everything with feminism which are all but realistic about the realities of biology and sexual dimorphism. The idea that marriage is best suited at a young age is of course sexism. They're told they can be career oriented and at the same time raise a family. Thanks to feminism it's become politically incorrect to point out the incompatibility of these things, or at least …
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:11 PM
9

The 'have it all' syndrome has become symptomatic of feminism.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:59 PM
8

Only thing that makes such ideas unpalatable are men's sense of integrity and honor which holds very little currency these days. Meanwhile, women have adapted quite easily to the Machiavellian ethos of domination of men. But in all seriousness, power doesn't necessarily comes from subjugation, but a sense of brotherhood or something would be better the current man hating culture where the loudest of them all are too often men themselves.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:29 PM
28

In-group preference. Imagine what would be accomplished if the so-called patriarchy actually had any.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:09 PM
-2

That makes perfect sense. By telling to stand up against feminism while you tell him to cower in fear, I must be some chump trying to get approval from women!
/r/MensRights12/01/13 09:33 PM
-2

I doubt if any of them have even heard of the MRM. He'll be given 1 warning, which will be "stop what you are doing, or you will be expelled" And as I said, be vindicated in the eyes of anyone with any sense.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 09:09 PM
-3

And why is it stupid? Plenty of people have told him what to do, tacitly this is saying how he should behave, as a man. They don't couch it in terms of 'being a man' like I did but this is the same thing. The other commenter said he would be a 'winner' if he followed his advice. So by his logic, he would be a loser if he stood up against the odds. At least standing up for yourself is some solid advice. I stand by what I said, PC language be damned.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 09:06 PM
-1

That's pretty messed up. It's been a while since I've been in high school but I really don't see him getting expelled for hanging up some posters.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:55 PM
-4

don't thrust it down others' throats I'm so sorry my comment on a website would have such an effect on you, you poor thing. I hope I didn't traumatize you with my mean sexist comment.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:49 PM
-4

Let's put this in perspective. Worse case scenario he gets called down to the office and anyone with any sense sees how ridiculous it is and he wins in their eyes. No real harm is done to him and he gets a very valuable life lesson. Best case scenario, people see the logic and some feminists get put in their place. The other case is he follows your advice and says nothing...and nothing happens and he's taught not to stand up for himself. Yes, he can go off campus but it doesn't stop the consensu…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:41 PM
-4

Since when do you get to define masculinity? I'm putting forth my own belief and people are free to take it or not. You on the other hand are saying this is unacceptable- so what makes you in charge of what can be said on the topic?? How idiotic can you be.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:32 PM
-1

A lot of things aren't easy. I hardly see that as an argument against doing it.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:15 PM
4

Apparently we're in the minority. The only time you should speak up is when you're on the side of the herd. Pretty soon this sub will sprout horns and start mooing like a cow.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:07 PM
11

Then that's what I call a real education. Instead you want to teach him helplessness and cowardice? You naysayers are clearly projecting your own insecurities. There's no basis for your argument beyond 'oh don't do it, it's scary and dangerous.' All I see are a bunch of ninnies are just projecting your own insecurities.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:02 PM
4

Raise fucking hell and enjoy the process. What are they going to do about it? It's not like you're at some kind of risk of bodily harm.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:51 PM
-1

I don't give a shit about the movement. But a coward sends children to fight battles they don't have to. You can't be serious. OP isn't capable of challenging a bunch of half-wit "feminists" his own age?
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:50 PM
-5

You really want to do the "a man does xyz" on an MRM subreddit? THAT is pathetic. So what are you saying? I'm not allowed to put forth an ethic for men? What kind of weiner, politically correct shit is this. And so what is the ethic you're putting forth: that you only pick fights based on convenience instead of on integrity and courage? You picked the wrong battle and that's obvious for anyone with more fortitude than a wet paper bag.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:48 PM
-10

You're pathetic. A man stands up for what he believes in.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 06:30 PM
0

Just my seemingly unpopular opinion.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 11:43 PM
-25

As he gets older and loses interest in pleasing mommy you're going to have a confused young man. Feel bad for the kid.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 11:56 PM
12

I might be better positioned to speak to what it feels like to be discriminated against culturally, but that wouldn't make it legitimate to argue with a black person from the US that I know exactly what he feels like. Then how can they assume that white men are just given a red carpet treatment their whole life and proceed from there? Is this not the same as purporting to know what it is like to be a person of color or whatever? The whole 'social justice' belief system is self-contradictory on m…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 10:47 PM
13

This is actually closer to the truth. Every person is unique. But this won't do- all white men must be some sort of wall street executive who got there through nepotism. It's just a way to foment class warfare. The truth is the number one minority is the individual. Unfortunately the idea that you stand on your own two feet isn't very popular with those who make their living leeching off of others.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:20 PM
12

What is strange is that they claim to have some sort of knowledge of what it is like to be a white male. Why is it they can lay claim to such knowledge, but not in the other direction?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:20 PM
17

I'd tell this Yishan fellow to drop his little persecution complex. Asians in the U.S. score better on tests and their future incomes reflect that by being higher than average of whites. Can we start talking about Asian privilege? Going on about being a person of color and thus, 'one of the good guys,' is just an opportunistic and selfish abuse of our countries difficult history with race. He's making bank while living in (I assume) somewhere around silicon valley which is the most meritocratic …
/r/MensRights02/01/13 08:03 PM
34

He can't both be for free speech and political correctness. "Male privilege" is to say you are unable to speak on certain matters because of your sex. Whereas women are allowed to be experts on all things regarding sexual discrimination, you will have a very hard time as a man- Warren Farrell is a good example. Political correctness has a chilling affect in that people will be afraid to challenge and discuss certain things. What we have on reddit is the chance to speak anonymously which creates …
/r/MensRights02/01/13 07:45 PM
1

Daily Bell: You also said, "I am here to represent Yorkshire women who always have dinner on the table when you get home." Some say you have a problem with women. Do you think so? Godfrey Bloom: I made the point that homemakers are worthy of our consideration, too...raising a family and making a home is enormously important, too. Many feminists simply can't believe that...Painting me as a misogynist spares them from making rational arguments. It's because women like this are breaking ranks and t…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 01:30 AM
-2

I wonder how you see an ideology which demonizes men and provides benefits for a group solely at the expense of men can coexist with men's rights.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 04:53 AM
-12

Feminists aren't known for their sense of humor.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 04:44 AM
-9

Men are ultimately the enforcers.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:23 PM
2

What an awful writer. I can barely make sense of this shit.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 07:22 PM
16

I had someone say point blank that I was literally holding his children hostage by defending gun rights. More than not they're from high class town. I'd be more worried about getting struck by lightning. Of course, it's people who can't escape to some little island of homogeneity and middle class values who are going to be victims of crime because they can't defend themselves. Leftists love to cast themselves as victims whenever possible with the sickening outcome of seriously endangering people…
/r/MensRights27/12/12 08:46 PM
2

Then do you disagree with this cartoon? The NRA's response wasn't to the tragedy but the media and the left's call for gun control. The cartoon totally misrepresents the reality.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 08:41 PM
3

Sounds like being in a relationship for one continuous shit test.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 08:12 PM
19

The truth is the NRA was completely silent for several days after the incident while the anti-gun left came out politicizing the event immediately after. They didn't have a choice but to defend themselves.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 08:07 PM
14

Self-defense is a perfectly good reason.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 07:55 PM
-12

Why stop at 2? You can just justify it later. You could cheat on your husband with multiple men and just think of all the other women are worse and absolve yourself of all guilt.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:55 PM
-10

Imagine how much more special your marriage would have been had you not slutted around. The fact that you need to come justify yourself shows how insecure you are about it.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 06:46 PM
1

Where'd you find it? The fakey mcfake shit site?
/r/MensRights26/12/12 09:29 PM
24

First date: 'I only do anal.'
/r/MensRights26/12/12 07:47 PM
1

Hopefully she gets a reduced sentenced for being a delicate little flower.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 07:45 PM
-9

Learn game and keep your woman happy. Being afraid of women is guaranteed to trigger her insecurity. See it as a high stakes game. If you perform well under pressure it shouldn't be an issue.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 07:40 PM
2

Good to see Aus tax dollars being used for good science.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 11:07 PM
1

The idea that they can be 'unfair' to their children is based on the same faulty premise.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:51 PM
1

Can you explain?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:22 PM
1

Why is fairness a precept to healthy development? Such data would be necessarily based on relative numbers. It's impossible to discern from such data whether or not more or less 'minutes spent coddling' is good or bad. It's this tendency to try to right a wrong because you are beginning from the belief that different treatment is unfair. But observed differences are not a basis for actual significance. Asking what really is most significant in a child's health should be the starting point, not a…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:04 PM
2

Because a person's sex has no bearing on their development or identity?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:53 PM
2

Small differences into the degree you pamper crying kids probably won't make a huge difference in the long run. Keeping them out of public schools and being a good example will. Girls need to have a protective and active father in their life as they get older more than boys do else they look for love in all the wrong places. The best piece of advice I think I have is to not start from any ideological premise (completely devoid of reality) like egalitarianism. So if you must, seek advice far away…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:49 PM
-6

It's biological. To have sexual "needs" is beta in the eyes of women. Courtship once took place in strictly limited environs. As boring as that was, the opposite extreme exists where anywhere and anytime is fair game. Hence chivalry and sexual modesty kept social interaction between the opposite sexes non-sexual. Blame the sexual revolution. That is one of the trade off and nothing is going to change it.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 07:32 PM
2

I hope you'll do a self-post. I can imagine there are others who struggle with this.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:10 AM
10

Feminists basically use regular women as hostages by claiming that attacks against feminists are attacks on women. Too many women take on the term because they are given a completely false version of what it actually stands for.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:37 AM
6

Wow. What a whiny bitch. I was actually talking about your comment. I realize I wasn't very strict with the pronouns, but then again, women often portray themselves as some large interconnected borg when it comes to showing solidarity with their sisters. making up stuff about what "feminism" wants. Feminists never stopped beating the drums when it came to standards for police or firefighters, why stop at the marines? I’m hoping to make a difference for women down the road. These aren't the words…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:13 PM
7

So long as they did well amongst the failures then it's a point for team women! Just stop whining about this grrl power shit. They wanted to be treated like men. They were given the same shot as everyone else. They're not allowed to complain anymore. Most boys grow out of this pathetic mindset during youth sports. It's just women are mollycoddled their whole lives they never learn proper sportsmanship.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:40 PM
5

It's like you all have never heard of viral marketing.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 02:45 AM
6

Such an obvious troll...
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:10 AM
0

Will one of you NAFALT people make a list of all the 'good feminists' for the next time this comes up? The list won't be very long so it shouldn't take much work.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:16 AM
-2

Why are you so presumptuous as to speak for MRM? The MRM is anti-feminist. Educate yourself.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 02:18 AM
-1

What good has ever come out of boot-licking feminists? Look at that Farrell fellow. He is so delicate and masterful in playing the PC game of these psychos and look how that pays off. It's delusional.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:20 PM
-11

Who gives a shit.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 07:36 PM
2

Are we talking the average airhead that calls themselves a feminist because it's cool and stuff or, you know, feminists in places of power and the true believers in feminist doctrine- government, universities, media, psychopaths like this blogger... Swat at flies all you want... It won't make the stink go away.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 08:34 AM
0

Socratic method requires willing participants.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 02:24 AM
2

Please point out to me the "good majority" because I have never seen it.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:44 PM
0

the goal of feminism is equality. Why is this sub so full of naive chumps?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:40 PM
8

Affirmative action practices? The thing that should be agreed upon is whether you get special rights based on what group you belong to. If you do not reject that principle, than on what basis can you reject feminism? If you accept it based on race, you may as well quit complaining when women get special rights.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:19 PM
9

Institutional sexism is just as bad as institutional racism. There is no need to self-censor what you're thinking because it really is completely outrageous. It's just that jittery leftists are afraid of being seen as racist (nothing new) so don't mind them. When you fight for men's rights or white rights, you are actually fighting the problem of identity politics. This is why individualism needs to be the goal so we can stop playing this whole oppression bingo game and realize that the individu…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:15 PM
11

There is no reason to arbitrarily draw lines of what can be talked about, especially since white rights and men rights are categorically the same problem resulting from group politics.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:07 PM
1

What a bad ass.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 12:22 AM
-1

I'm familiar with Farrell. You make zero criterion in the statement that "boys are violent." I could say girls are also violent and it would be just as valid.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 06:40 AM
2

move away from violent behavior. Boys are violent by default? Men as a group do violence against women or do some individuals do violence? Don't repeat such nonsense. The incidence of violence is drastically lower for women. If we're to be egalitarian about it, there is far greater violence done to men. Apply logic to their presumptions. By using their language you are reinforcing feminist myths.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 05:38 AM
3

What makes you think I'm a liberal? The old right and libertarians are anti-war as well. I guess that makes you neo-con scum, or at least a silly caricature of one. edit: I should add modern liberals haven't really taken a philosophical stance against war. Obama went into Libya without a declaration of war and has continued the Bush policies.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 04:26 AM
-3

Get off your high horse. The vast majority of wars have been young men sent to die killing other young men for no good reason other than to further the interests of an elite class. Are we not in the men's rights sub? Are you not against male disposability? Yet you are parroting one of its central mythologies.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:52 AM
4

You really believe war is about freedom? The tragedy of modern war is that the young men die fighting each other--instead of their real enemies back home in the capitals. Edward Abbey Remember things like this instead.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:04 AM
6

Anti-feminists need to show up and challenge their claims.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:41 PM
28

She fears you No, she fears a made up boogie man made up of lies and fear mongering.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:40 PM
2

Take equal opportunity to it's logical outcome. Each person has same access to everything. No person can eat healthier, learn in better settings, be exposed to better things. Imagine where this leads. You would have children all kept in orphanages and given computerized educations and are fed through a feeding tube. The question to ask is what is the point in allowing people to be free (the allowance of "unequal outcomes") if they aren't allowed to seek out these better things for themselves and…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 08:56 PM
2

I guess if you like fat chicks? I actually had in mind overall demeanor and outlook in mind. The concept of a character and femininity have been traded in for conniving bitch as the new sexy. Feminism has certainly led the charge on that one.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:37 PM
1

Missing the big picture. Marriage law and feminism killed sex. Women are told to intentionally make themselves as unsexy as possible. Who would want to go through the trouble for that?
/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:07 PM
0

How is socialism much different from feminism? In either case it aims to redistribute from one group to another. Socialists aren't qualified to comment on this issue. Just look at the lengths they go with the jargon.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 08:53 PM
1

Agreed. The underlying presumption is that when men are "manly," they are doing it under some sort of 'socially-constructed' identity rather than out of their nature. I don't see this as furthering men's rights but merely substantiating the feminist paradigm, 'gender-roles' itself being a feminist buzz word.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:33 PM
-4

It's perfectly acceptable to be a pussy these days. How about letting men be men?
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:03 AM
6

The Obama ad really does reflect most modern women's sentiments though. They don't really think beyond their 'lady parts' when it comes to voting, or even living. I've never seen that woman's TV show but I imagine it's the same soap opera drama shit.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 02:27 AM
16

Testosterone Increases Honesty, Study Suggests
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:46 PM
0

she is an entirely qualified person to be on the bench, and it absolutely shouldn't be a group that is all men. So one of the qualifications is that the position is filled so long as it isn't a man?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:46 AM
0

Don't know how superior classes by birthright has anything to do with social justice. If you are referring to the special advantages women have, that falls under the modern left's theory of social justice. To the rest of that, I don't see the relevance of any of that to the political reality of here and now. This is how left and right are defined today. There is nothing to argue about.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:43 PM
3

It doesn't matter if these leftist MRA want special stuff too. Without men as the "host" to feed off of, there will be no group left for the victim class to leech off of or demonize. For the left elites, including men would be shooting themselves in the foot.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:36 PM
-1

a superior female class by birthright goes so in the face of everything leftist Social Justice theory is the idea that natural differences are to be remedied through violence (the state). This is a wholly leftist idea.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:24 PM
2

The seeds are in human nature, not traditionalism.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:15 PM
1

So isolating children and locking them up everyday in classrooms full of other immature and insecure children causes mental distress? The real bully isn't the system itself? No, this is not how children ought to be raised.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:40 AM
1

Forcing someone to go to school and then limiting what they can say isn't an infringement of their speech?
/r/MensRights14/10/12 07:08 PM
-7

The people around here have thin skin as well. This is what the left wants, this is what you get. Tell those fuckers about your free speech. I bet that cunt sucks at trombone. Don't lie, I know it's true.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:49 AM
0

Literally Hitler.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:38 AM
5

Why?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:35 PM
1

In addition, listen to this and read this.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:54 AM
2

I'd be interested in seeing the divorce statistics for vasectomized men.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 07:11 PM
1

I'm sorry, what are you talking about?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:12 AM
1

Explain.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 02:01 AM
1

Why not?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 12:42 AM
2

What does it matter to me what contracts a business chooses to enter with its customers?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:27 PM
-5

Should a black business owner be required to serve a KKK member?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 09:22 PM
3

Baron-Cohen was featured in this Norwegian documentary on gender differences. So what will all you egalitarians do in the face of this? Wait around on your asses for women to change and see things your way and we can all live happily ever after in a gender-neutral paradise? Complete madness.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 04:19 AM
2

So where psychosis in women seeks social explanations to phenomena, the autistic spectrum approaches social situations analytically. I can see how this would make social interaction so paralyzing for autists. This model really gives "rape culture" paranoia a tidy explanation. Rape is seen as a culture-wide phenomena rather than the actions of a miniscule portion of deviants. From the blog: we feel this dissonance, this incongruousness strongly "Patriarchy" isn't a logical concept but a feeling. …
/r/MensRights03/10/12 04:11 AM
9

At my last count the percentage of minorities in this country is somewhere around 136,000%. How that works, I do not know and I do not ask.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:44 PM
0

It is noble and stoic to become a blubbering mess?
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:38 AM
2

Are the women who read 50 Shades of Grey sexist?
/r/MensRights29/09/12 10:14 PM
-2

I guess that makes women prejudiced. How dreadful.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 08:10 PM
-5

No, see my other comment. Women don't put themselves on the same status scale as men. The concern here is how women judge men.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 08:01 PM
-3

Women don't see status the same as men. Women see the status of other women in terms of the status of their man. Men see status among men in terms of accomplishment. And how can I "relegate" that to a woman? I cannot force women to act against their will. That idea is incredibly sexist. Tell that to all the women getting their kicks reading 50 Shades of Grey.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:58 PM
-2

its either that or a choice between living in chaos or one doing disproportionate work So...to make their relationships better? Call it whatever you want. You're merely restating my point in different terms.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:47 PM
1

What is with these "empowered" women and airing their dirty laundry on international news outlets? These "whine about being a modern woman" articles are like a whole new genre. I like how the $275/hr price of her therapy is put out as some badge of pride. I guess any therapist who could withstand entertaining this woman's delusions for a whole hour commands a high price.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:41 PM
2

It sure is convenient though.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:04 PM
-1

Is it not proclaimed by these same "modern couples" that sharing duties is good for the relationship? If you begin with assuming both groups are fated to have an equal likelihood of a bad relationship, then why bother trying to make it better by sharing duties in the first place? Such cognitive dissonance!
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:02 PM
-6

people that are sharing roles are less likely to stay in a bad relationship You'd think sharing roles would make for a good relationship! What a laugh.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 06:49 PM
-11

According to this study, couples who share the same role (housework) compete with each other, which introduces fractiousness that then can threaten the marriage. Women aren't competitive with men, they are competitive with other women. A man that is performing womanly duties simply isn't attractive. A man wearing a status uniform is sexy, wearing an apron isn't. That isn't to say being a freeloader is the way to a harmonious relationship. But wasting time and energy on low-status behavior won't …
/r/MensRights29/09/12 06:45 PM
-7

Who initiates divorce? The majority is women in the statistics I've seen. Thinking out loud here, but I've tried to come up with good reasons as to why education would have an impact. The truth is, it does and it doesn't. Total divorce is still higher among the less educated. Where aristocratic values remain, the upper class, divorce is still quite low. In fact, the truth is it is educated women simply initiate divorce more than educated men but overall divorce rates are still lower than the wor…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 06:33 PM
0

If true, it would appear to be a bipartisan thing as it was Obama who backed the policy I linked to.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 03:07 AM
1

France? Are you aware of the racially charged rioting that has taken place? Sweden and Norway are incomparable to the US for a multitude of reasons. The U.S. actually spends nearly as much per capita (in some sectors like health care more- yes, the U.S. fed govt spends more on health care per capita than Scandinavia). By such definition the U.S. would also be quite 'left.' a lack of resources to actually help those from the poorest socio-economic backgrounds. This is simply false. The flow of mo…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:42 PM
-1

"These people" are the oppressed victims as designated by leftists. Society is to be equalized by applying 'social justice' upon certain groups. I am not making this up. If you had any knowledge of the labels you apply to yourself you would know I'm not just inventing these things. The war on poverty, the policies instituted to achieve social justice instituted by liberals, has created a class of intergenerational welfare dependency. "These people" are those same victims. It's tragic. But of cou…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:33 PM
0

I'm not a republican.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:17 PM
3

Listen to this interview if you want to know what life is like for many welfare dependents. surely it is liberals who understand the social issues that affect these people They don't understand anything. It is the policies they advocate that create dysfunctional cultures. There is no wealth to redistribute upwards because these people have nothing are completely dependent on the state.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 12:05 AM
8

Where did I write anything about "poor people"? I will say right now that it is difficult to learn new things when you lack reading comprehension. Watch the video. She has serious issues and is not simply "poor." She probably witnessed her own mother doing the same things to the revolving 'father figures' that come by. Now imagine her entire community behaves this way. I probably made a few presumptions but I'm probably not far off here. You can't fix these types of things from the top down. You…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 10:27 PM
7

This is a daily occurrence in many public schools. You can't fix these types of people with better teachers or even a better system. These kids come from broken homes (usually with no father figure at home thanks to welfare policies) who have no idea how to behave in a civilized society. Of course, a left liberal sees this and blames teachers for lack of funds or something rather than looking at the big picture which is that these people live on the seams of the tearing social fabric and are sim…
/r/MensRights22/09/12 09:43 PM
36

What an empowered woman.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 09:35 PM
8

When did 'sticks and stones' stop being a thing? There will always be somebody that would judge what you do or are. You have to learn to deal with it. Feeling sorry for yourself and caring what others might say about you makes you a loser, not being a virgin.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 03:49 AM
2

Humans are not powerless to the sex drive because humans can act on their conscience. Many men obviously create rules for themselves and restrain their biology all the time in order to pursue other things. If you enter the hook-up scene you'll find those men who are more impulsive. If you present yourself as having traditional values, socialize in places random sex isn't the primary goal, you will elicit attention from men who are more guided by their conscience. A man's nature can fall on eithe…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:11 PM
1

Maybe I paint it as a cruel injustice because, you know, it is. Injustice for who? The mother and children who have a man in the house? Or the man who has a wife he finds attractive and a family? Catch-22. If you're a woman interested in turning out women's emotional bag of tricks, then you're just doing it to increase your appeal as a woman who's willing to turn out women's emotional bag of tricks Like I said, it's one thing to dispassionately point it out and another to disparage the women (an…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:25 AM
2

But what is the apparatus that feminism acts through? It is the state. The left and right propose digging it's heels in and inundating state involvement into every facet of life. Under libertarianism social relations evolve naturally. There are no interest groups trying to engineer behavior. Feminism without coercion becomes on par with any other harmless diversion. As soon as the state has the power to make winners and losers there are groups who will exploit that. Sumner's forgotten man is the…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:04 AM
3

It doesn't matter if it is all equal on paper. Men will pay more into the system at harder jobs. And the biological fact that women want men to protect them (how awful, I know) means starting a family becomes ever more remote of a possibility. Sure, throw the man a little treat. Because men actually doing the actual work, they'll keep the game going a little longer. Meanwhile the fundamental problems remain- the wealth transfers continue and the bloating make-work for women continues to balloon.…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:15 PM
2

You can't stand that men will go to such lengths for attractive women. It makes sense to make all the guys know how wicked that is (and how dumb they are)- surely they'll go for the woman of a more egalitarian stripe now (aka you). It's one thing to point this out and another to paint it as a cruel injustice as you do, perhaps subconsciously, to increase your own status. Women constantly do this to each other and you know it. Yours is just a more sophisticated approach.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:05 PM
1

dancing monkeys Why not just admit your own distaste for men? You clearly think they're nothing but mindless brutes. I don't think you are wrong on a basic level, but you clearly want to poison the well for everyone else. I hope this isn't a case of sour grapes. Still can't control that female jealousy, eh?
/r/MensRights17/09/12 10:46 PM
2

How is being chattel for the state "getting something"? Typhon, I'm familiar with your schtick of dissecting traditional relationships. I'm not going to argue your opinion on this matter here but why don't you apply that critical examination to the state? At least in relationships there is consent. No such consent exists with the state. Nobody asked me to sign anywhere when I was rudely made aware of being under a "social contract." And how is being the worker drone for the state apparatus any b…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 10:17 PM
9

I'll spell it out for any who still aren't getting it: The libertarians knew what feminism was all about from the get go because they understand the basic nature of statism. A and B get together to talk about how C is going to take care of Z. Feminism was immediately apparent as socialism for women at the expense of men. Now leftists want to come onto the scene with their victim rhetoric about how awful we men have it and how somebody is going to pay while insisting feminists are completely inno…
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:47 PM
4

Hillary.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 12:58 AM
-1

Completely imaginary take on economics. (Aka, the story of the creation- government stimulus! Tax the rich! Print more money and everyone will be rich! The words of the prophet Paul Krugman, amen.) Universalist ideology that cannot coexist with other groups with religious-like aspects. (E.g., "I'm a leftist. Fuck Islam. Fuck Christianity. Fuck you.") Utopian vision of humanity (heaven on earth) where all people are equally adept in all things if only they can be amended with government intervent…
/r/MensRights16/09/12 08:21 PM
-4

It was men who liberated women, not women themselves. Female feminists are largely of the butch persuasion. Women with 'feminine' markers couldn't give a shit about dealing with the problems of creating civilization. The problem is lesbobos are portrayed as representing all women in the media. Hollywood's portrayal of women is equally fanciful. The result is the frustrated nice guys of reddit who don't really know what most women are all about.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 07:59 PM
2

Clinton has brought up women's living standards as justification for war many times.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 07:53 PM
-4

Fuck you. Leftism is the true religion of peace.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 07:47 PM
2

Le hivemind
/r/MensRights16/09/12 05:08 PM
-6

Poor 4chan. You're right. I'm no better than a feminist. :(
/r/MensRights16/09/12 01:45 AM
-10

I'm not being serious.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 01:32 AM
-15

You're right. I'm just wondering if something being posted on 4chan is some kind of feat.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 12:57 AM
-42

4chan? Awesome. This will do wonders for the MRM's credibility.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 12:28 AM
2

neither you nor I know what creates genius - so what makes you so sure that it's a biological factor? There is certainly evidence. Male intelligence manifests in those activities that have created civilization and they are thus remembered as genius. This is born out by the fact that men remain outliers in technical and philosophical pursuits. I'm soooo sorry if you find this offensive. How could you even think that women are inherently dumber than men? How could anyone? The fact that Dworkin is …
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:33 PM
3

There are no pioneers for them to look up to - from Aristotole to Nietzche to Picasso to Bach to Newton to etc. Or just maybe there are no pioneers is because biologically there are simply fewer women who rise to that level of genius. And since when is there a requirement that women can't look up to men? Just accept the truth: women in academia are a radically new group, they have negligible representation in all of human history Trying to project your own denial? They produced shit because they…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:32 PM
14

used by sociologists No, it is used by victim group ideologues to guard their shit from criticism.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:08 PM
1

Indeed. And it goes both ways.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:12 AM
3

Is that social manipulation or drugs and plastic surgery? Certainly giving a woman steroids from birth might make them more man-like but this again goes well beyond "socialization."
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:09 AM
5

Here is at least one feminist who states outright her entire belief system is based on feminist theory alone. The whole notion of patriarchy as oppressor of women is completely destroyed by evolutionary science. Biological differences are just as susceptible to social manipulation after the fact as any other aspect of human life. If only this were so! We could squeeze a few more points of IQ out of you to see why you are wrong.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 05:03 AM
1

Feminists see themselves as sole authorities on that issue and also see policing men's sexuality as their role as well with very few people defending men. Naughty insults are small time in comparison to wider trends.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 07:37 PM
1

So sex shouldn't be taboo but criticizing it should be taboo?
/r/MensRights09/09/12 05:19 PM
1

Trust me, grown men are the same way (and can pay royally for it if they aren't careful.) A wise man seeks to understand that aspect of themselves.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 04:24 AM
1

(As if a man would GAF) Nobody is stopping anyone from doing that, women just don't want to be criticized for it.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 04:20 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQWoNhrY_fM Watch this. Women are seeking "rights" (a perfectly meaningless word these days) at the expense of men. Feminism is the enemy.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 03:54 AM
1

Cool story, bro. Learn to not obsess over women. You can thank me later.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 03:51 AM
3

This fucked up fallacy is dangerous and dismissive. There is no fallacy because they are joking. It isn't rape culture "too" because 'rape culture' is nonsensical gibberish completely divorced from reality. To participate in political correctness only insures it will never go away. The point was to end feminism, not mimic it. Christ.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 12:39 AM
4

What would a snappy come back have accomplished? Not a whole lot. Don't dwell on it. Let it just glance off you. If you become a vindictive person because of her it's the same as getting put down.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 01:44 AM
1

They start preaching for much more liberation than women want or need. What is this supposed to mean?? What a weird article. The mythical 'bad boy' who is a woman beater and a chauvinist still reigns supreme in the fantasies of women. Put it simply, women are a bit masochistic from within. That is why it is not unnatural to see beautiful, confident and successful women seek out potentially abusive relationships. WTF
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:01 PM
10

I remember back in 4th grade being treated like a complete idiot in front of my entire class Humiliation, or at least a small dosage of it, is a built in feature of school. Being forced to interact outside of your comfort zone every damn day for 6 hours with no privacy and complete powerlessness of where you go and do is humiliation if you ask me. It's absolutely inhumane and it teaches this repulsive mind set that people feel controlling other people's lives is perfectly normal (the feminist' m…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 11:15 PM
7

Children of hugely divergent brain differences, development rates, interests, life experience and the school system is involved in this impossible game of trying to "teach" them. It is an impossible and ultimately inhumane act to cram children into situations where they are all expected to behave in a single mold of behavior. For 12 years, no less. Edit: to clarify, I want to know why kids of either inclination ought to be ostracized? Some like poetry and plays- some are more mechanically minded…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 11:06 PM
8

I went through the gifted program. We were always reading plays, performing plays and writing poetry which was torture for me. All of the teachers were women. Math courses weren't part of the gifted program but the school did offer advanced math. Many girls in the gifted program took the normal level math class anyway. My solution isn't to try to salvage the school system to make it more boy friendly. I advocate ending compulsory schooling entirely. Just stop controlling people's lives.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 09:47 PM
2

I agree. That is their argument though. And it is pure absurdity.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 05:07 PM
1

Not forcing the taxpayer to pay for a woman's "BC" is the same as preventing them from getting it.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:33 AM
1

Isn't property a part of Maslows hierarchy? For example, he says a shelter is one of the basic needs- isn't a house immediately become property if it is given to someone?
/r/MensRights25/08/12 09:26 PM
-1

Being a racist and making a racist remark are two different things. That's one of the strangest things I've ever heard but I haven't really given it much thought. Anyways, here is me putting words into your mouth: tl;dr Sexist co-worker casually matter-of-fact downplays the paternal bond between a father and child. Oh wait- you wrote that. Honestly I thought ill humored and deceitful argument was a feature of feminism. Are you perhaps looking to become a mod here?
/r/MensRights25/08/12 02:51 AM
-4

Forgive me if I'm mistaken but passages like this make me think you're rather distraught over the ordeal: That was about 6 hours ago now, but the moment still resounds in my mind angrily and with contempt. That she, an unwed, child-free woman would so quickly dismiss the value of the bond between a father and his newborn child repulses me. This kind of attitude is something I've dealt with for at least the last 2 years at my job. People have a lot of different views on the genders so that is per…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 02:42 AM
-1

I'm simply for being an adult and not branding people as misogynist just because you don't see eye to eye on things. This is the same tactic feminists use to silence people who don't agree with them. If you want to tell me this tactic is fair game and not obstructive to open dialogue, I will reconsider what I've written. If shit were the other way around, you wouldn't be making a stint, now would you? I'm making a stint? You're the one who made a submission after being offended by some chick at …
/r/MensRights25/08/12 02:09 AM
-5

I'm not saying not to speak your mind. We both know that isn't the issue. When did 'sticks and stones may break my bones' stop applying? You make that chick that got invited for coffee on an elevator look perfectly sensible.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 01:48 AM
-2

I think free speech is a big deal. I think whining when someone hurts your feelings and then hiding behind some tactic from the feminsit play book of throwing out the 'hate/discrimination' word is a tactic for cowards. Why doesn't he ask for advice on how to better communicate? The reason the tension built was because he became offended and clammed up when he had no reason to take some girl's point of view personally.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 01:42 AM
-12

I think that is a wrong and shitty definition- misogyny doesn't have 'discrimination' as a homonym. You still need to get thicker skin. How could you possibly label that "astounding" sexism? Get a grip.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 12:29 AM
-13

Nothing is exactly the same between individuals so you're both wrong. And how is that hatred? You need to grow thicker skin.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 11:38 PM
2

You don't care about an issue that has disproportionately affected black men? Then the mod accuses me of racism. Or why racists shouldn't be allowed to co-opt the men's rights movement. They make us all look like bigots. He's the one that doesn't seem to care for black men.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 04:26 AM
8

Why are they through the roof? You know the statistics about kids raised by single mothers? Uncle Williams MRMarxist Figures.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 04:22 AM
10

Accusing me of racism? Classy move, friend.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 04:20 AM
2

That particular economist hasn't written anything particularly about men. In the spirit of generating some new ideas, I decided to submit it. Maybe some big name blogger wants to talk about it. But how would they know if it gets removed by mods?
/r/MensRights20/08/12 04:16 AM
9

Turning fathers into optional features isn't an issue? What about the young boys being raised without a father and are more likely to land themselves in prison? What about the poor saps who have to pay into the system? Fathers and sons be ing deprived of family makes some of the other issues brought up around here seem completely trivial. Maybe you shouldn't be defining what belongs here.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 10:37 PM
1

It doesn't need to be justified as some problem of 'equality' because "victim blaming" as an issue is just a diversion anyway. What is the larger issue? First, why is rape singled out as you point out? This is easy- it's already in people's minds that this it is a purely male on female crime and feminists can dig that. Secondly, why do feminists believe victim blaming really is so awful in the first place? It's not convincing to say it is for the sake of a victim's feelings- sticks and stones an…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:39 AM
2

For Rebecca Watson there doesn't appear to be a line between "advice" and boorish comments.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:10 AM
9

She is clearly equating telling women to take precautions with 'victim' blaming as her previous tweet attempts to make a parody of. Close your mouth. Read. Think. See? Context.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:36 AM
18

Rebecca Watson thinks (rightly) that blaming women for being raped is wrong. Bull crap. Nobody is blaming women for jack shit, it's a complete straw man feminists use to demonize men. Submitter does a disservice by parroting it. Feminists think teaching women to take precautions is "victim" blaming and proceed as if rapists get community service with a pat on the back for their trouble. If you want to avoid getting kicked in the balls (omg, she's so witty), perhaps entering into a bar full of le…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:32 PM
10

There is always a lack of concrete examples in these discussions. Please, show me who all these non-radical feminists are and I will show you how they all inevitably advocate some sort of anti-male government policy as well as push some male-demonizing attitude. Name names!
/r/MensRights12/08/12 11:19 PM
3

I don't think letting your emotions control you is a positive trait.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 06:58 PM
2

There are no 'moderate' feminists today. Women already have the same rights. It's like saying you're an abolitionist. Those "moderate" feminists don't realize how radical they seem to the average MRA. Whereas men face real legal bias, they continue to prattle on like women are part of some lower caste and their proposed solutions, inevitably more bending over backwards on the part of men while abdicating more self-responsibility, is perfectly sensible. The reason the artist and those who share h…
/r/MensRights06/08/12 09:16 PM
0

You ought to have more faith in us.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 10:15 PM
2

Thanks for clarifying that. You don't want to hurt your political correctness score. It's super important.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 09:48 PM
0

politely explain those nasty clients That will go over well. Businesses are there to make a profit. So are his coworkers who rely on the business' success. They aren't there to put themselves out there to make some counter cultural statement. Also, take in mind OP hasn't said a single word about freaked out clients, so it seems the problem resides solely in the employer side All jobs of this nature have appearance guidelines. I've also been approached by a manager at a job for having long hair t…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 03:12 PM
0

Because in accepting this principle, it justifies those special rights and the dangerous outcomes of their implementation. I don't think anyone here advocates gender quotas, but that is happening in the job world thanks to these laws. Isn't that what MRM is against? Isn't equality equal treatment, not equal outcomes? Secondly, these "rights" come at a cost, so they are not "rights" but entitlements. Rights in the classical liberal tradition are only ours insofar as they do not come at the cost o…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 02:56 PM
-8

People have a right to discriminate on whatever criteria they see fit and you don't have a "right" to work any where. Wherever appearance might affect the bottom line, expect to be held to some kind of standards. Suppose you wanted to go in drag or wear make up. Is it also discrimination b/c women can do it, even if customers are getting freaked out? Come on. Your employer didn't write the rules of societal expectations and you can't expect them to put their neck out for your sake. Discriminatio…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 12:12 PM
1

It seems feminism destabilizes women. Isolate them from men because they're bad guys. Isolate them from their bodies because they're either being brainwashed to be prudes or forced to be sluts. It's a rather nasty form of manipulation to make supporters fall into line because they're led to believe it's a path to security. Thanks for sharing this, good stuff.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:57 AM
2

That sucks but MRA isn't therapy.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:18 AM
0

Do go on.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 10:08 PM
-1

The feminist movement has more going for it than men's rights for a reason. The inequality leans much more one way than the other. If anyone here disagrees with that, you are seriously deluded Wow. Don't know where to begin. Everything I said here isn't for your sake because I know it wont get through but here it goes anyway... There is zero common ground between feminism and the MRM. They are the ones advocating laws and policies the MRM rejects...VAWA, family court bias, domestic violence bias…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 10:07 PM
2

Scholasticism for one. Religious scholars do use logic with some rigor- they just disagree with their first premises. atheist is dismissing accepting something because you were told and instead rely on what you have observed. Actually, if we're being technical, to join the club you just have to say god doesn't exist. Hence you can have some radically varying ethical beliefs that are still consistent with atheism. Some groups have cobbled together something of an ethic but they call themselves hu…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:41 PM
1

Found a cool essay that summed it up. "Censorship through consensus" is also a real possibility. There are countries where the adherence to a shared social, though not religious, code is a fact of life. Understanding that entails discerning where the boundaries of expression are, and where they might be interfered with in a consensus situation. link Self-censorship is really a thing. Call it political correctness. He wants to shame what he opposes and normalize his vision of what's acceptable. J…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:30 PM
-7

Their atheist ethics or atheist method This is absurd. Consider the huge cross section of libertarians all the way to commies who are atheists. Pretty much all ethical systems claim an adherence to logic, it is not exclusive to atheism. And there are no conjoining implications of atheism to a system of ethics that I can think of that is worth it's while. dismissive and insulting I have a simpler answer: they're mindless dolts who can't really think for themselves but are too stupid to realize it…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:17 PM
1

Anyone who would dismiss as much at first glance is in denial. And those are the type of people they want approval from? We have to sanitize everything that comes out of our mouths for the sake of those poor, poor women. How dare men criticize them!
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:04 PM
-21

/r/atheism is flawed from the start. How can you have anything productive to say about not believing in something? There is no atheist ethics or atheist method to examine things, so yes, it gets a bit trite after a while. MRM is not the same. It is rejecting a belief but it has it's own prescriptions (with some disagreement there) so a lot of productive things are said here. No, you people are unhappy with /r/mensrights because you want the front page to by palatable to feminists. You want to ha…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:56 PM
1

Yes...damn spell check...
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:43 PM
-10

I don't perceive MR as an opposing force to feminism. NAFALT! 5 upvotes. Nice. This submission is just another stab in the back for this place. You people want to join hands with feminists and make this subreddit another leftist PC-friendly shit hole I'll be excusing my self out for greener pastures.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:42 PM
1

Censoring by definition involves someone acting in an official capacity. Not really but ok.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:37 PM
0

You're not giving people enough credit. I think most people can take things for what they are without getting emotional. Or at least that's what it looks like to an outsider. That's the other thing. It seems the idea is to hide the fact that you're really a whiny baby? I personally think mature men can handle themselves so I don't see it that way. It seems like projection on their part to think people are unable to control their emotions as the initial commenter indicated he could not therefore …
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:32 PM
-2

In effect that is censoring things you don't want to hear.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:55 PM
2

So in the context of feminists and society at large openly declaring female supremacy, sharing things that are contrary to conventional wisdom is pettiness?
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:51 PM
-2

get the fuck out. No more of these fucking facebook photos No more articles speaking on outlier women And this should imply what exactly?
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:43 PM
-1

I do not approve of unsubstantiated bashing either. But it is not hate to share articles about women behaving badly/calling out misogyny and if that is what you are referring to (this is clearly stated by the submitter as what he is referring to), you are simply wrong. Labeling shit as hate and excluding it from the discussion because it shines badly on women is politically correct horseshit. It's simply masked white-knightery as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:39 PM
5

If it feels good, it must be good. A winning set of morals right there.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:12 PM
5

I honestly don't see what's so immature about the women behaving badly stories or misogyny IRL. In the first case, people desperately need to be shown that the whole "female supremacy" claim is bogus. The basis of not wanting to read these tings is probably the desire for approval from the politically correct hive-mind and/or women. If you want approval, I don't think advocating MRM is for you. In the latter case, I don't see why rejecting anyone's experience does anyone any good (maybe they wan…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:43 PM
1

opening a dialogue Ironic then that I would be down-voted for offering a different viewpoint, yeah? Honestly, it seems this submission was motivated by a need for acceptance and approval. It's "we don't want to be just another /r/feminism, no, we're better than them." Perhaps it is some internal urge to close out anything that could possibly reflect badly on the holy unblemished spirit of the female sex, because that would be just awful, right? I mean, what would the women looking at the front p…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:35 PM
-20

So the readers here are just patsys who will be driven to hate and thereby unable to think straight? Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak because a baby can't chew it. Maybe this applies to emotionally immature folks but I think most of us here are level-headed adults. If you really can't control yourself, it's better to have your heart steeled on a forum than caught unaware in the real world.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 05:55 PM
-3

Would you rate your husband higher on the rate of attractiveness of 1-10? That is, would you say you lucked out or did he luck out? Just passing curiosity.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 07:28 AM
-6

How would you rate yourself and him in attractiveness on a scale 1-10? Just curious.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 07:26 AM
2

http://youtu.be/okPnDZ1Txlo Compulsory schooling needs to be abolished. It's only existed for 100 or so years in the U.S. now and has been nothing but destructive force upon the minds of children, particularly those free thinking non-conformist types. Now that school is being used as a way to do what can only be considered destruction of an entire gender, I hope more people wake up to the fact that compulsory schooling is nothing but a political tool to inculcate certain behaviors upon the masse…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 11:15 PM
2

Her defense of the comment was gibberish. "There's all sorts of cultures." How is that for straightforward? She was trying to defuse the outrageous shit she just spewed out by saying, well, not all fathers do that. Then tell us about these mythical fathers who are sexualizing their kids? The irony is that this was an underhanded response in itself when she just said girls should be taught to be "chaps" or whatever.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:20 AM
2

have them lapping us by a good amount The OECD ranks the U.S. and the Scandinavian countries all within 1 pt on a 10pt scale. I guess that's "lapping"? B. Unsure why the growing Muslim population is at all relevant. I'm unsure why atheism is any more relevant. Muslims certainly aren't sympathetic to your dream about egalitarianism. disposable fathers and generous welfare Pay women to have children (using money extracted from a males pay check) and see what happens. gabout men, en masse, opting o…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:13 AM
1

It has plenty to do with different societal outlooks as well. You can't really measure satisfaction.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 01:02 AM
-1

Feminism is a phenomenon of the developed western world so no surprise there. All developed countries in the west are within a point or so in life satisfaction ratings so it is a moot point. It makes sense that feminism would boost GDP as more labor goes into production and less into child-rearing, at least in the short run. predominantly atheist Among whom there is falling birthrates coinciding with a growing population of Muslims. pitfalls of feminism Here's one: illegitimacy rates are over 50…
/r/MensRights16/07/12 10:12 PM
1

NYTimes is the last place I'd go for this topic.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 03:56 AM
1

It should be obvious that needing something can affect its acceptability. It was your central point though- it's obviously not very convincing. People routinely engage in acts that are superfluous to their survival that where do not question it's acceptability. For instance, people don't need to eat so much, drink so much or fuck so much to live. But what business is it of everyone else? You could have a white pride event but whites are already taught to be proud of their culture and achievement…
/r/MensRights14/07/12 03:42 AM
5

"Black power" isn't racist? Why does it matter if there is a need for "pride" for it be acceptable?
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:27 PM
20

Protected classes are very good at cherry picking what they want to hear about themselves. We're constantly reminded of the terrible things white males do and their achievements are no doubt at the expense of the oppressed. Your approach is ideal but heresy in this land of identity politics.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 04:21 AM
42

I don't think there should be a white history/male studies class but why shouldn't there be one? And if black pride is acceptable, why not white pride? Nobody wants to answer these things!
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:45 AM
2

Conservatives have really been soft on MR's issues from what I can tell- I haven't really looked at their argument to be honest but I really don't see self-labeled conservative politicians even touching the issue of feminism. You should check out the libertarian argument though, one of my favorite pieces by a major libertarian: http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard4.html. Here's Ron Paul coming out against VAWA. Libertarianism opposes state coercion outright (e.g. through marriage/child s…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 05:47 AM
1

Why is it LRC and Mises haters always seem huffy and dismissive without anything to back it up?
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:13 AM
-1

is fundamentally about equality No- it's about social justice which is in other words, the forceful redistribution of wealth. This theory forms the basis for everything feminists advocate.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 08:08 PM
3

in the deepest bastions of godless liberalism, feminism is being exposed for its madness. How do you define "liberalism"?
/r/MensRights05/07/12 11:11 PM
9

This submission is pathetic. This is the same leftist victim mentality that fuels feminism.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 06:36 PM
-17

This discussion is inane. You're just saying be polite and decent toward people which is not exactly a novel concept. There's no reason to single out sluts or gays here. All people should be brought into the fold. This identity politics, or anti-identity bullying I guess, is no different than feminism. You don't get special rights for being male or female- that's feminist talk. You get your rights from your humanity- 'all people created equally' and all that. Likewise, you don't get special prot…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 02:11 AM
12

That's all very interesting but I don't see how that relates to the video. I'm impressed by all the managerial slogans you can bust out though.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 04:38 AM
18

Watch girlwriteswhat's video on male disposability. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA Men were the protectors and laborers- women, their reproductive capacity makes them more valuable in the long term for men. This has led to a societal codes split between the sexes with regard to violence as well as more leniency toward bad behavior. There is perhaps a biological element as well, where women are seen as less dangerous and younger women are put on a pedestal because of their sexiness. N…
/r/MensRights10/06/12 09:46 PM
4

The entire leftist outlook is perverse and neurotic at its core. How can you oppose racism, and at the same time use collectivist language and employ a collectivist methodology? The only group looking at social issues and actively employing methodological individualism are libertarians afaik- and they're the ones leftists will label as the most vile of racists! I think it is useful to know that most people do not think like SRS. SRS consists of radicalized true believers. They won't change- they…
/r/MensRights07/06/12 06:37 PM
2

Is talking about not talking about them still talking about them?
/r/MensRights07/06/12 06:11 PM
1

oncerned with maintaining their own local power Sort of plays into my point, no? However flawed the men were, the underlying reasoning of a restrained state was right. How you suppose the men of this age, who are leagues below the founding fathers in character and intellect, are going to fix this broken system? How is welfare good in any way for men or women? It has destroyed the social fabric (the family) in this country. In 1940, the illegitimacy rate among blacks was 19 percent, in 1960, 22 p…
/r/MensRights01/06/12 10:09 PM
1

its people. The founders understood the nature of people. It was to be a nation of laws, not men, because they knew men were not angels. What do you think feminism is? It's the selfish instincts of women and the white-knight instincts of men acting through the unrestrained state resulting in the system we have today. Only government which is restrained prevents people's worse natures working through the violent apparatus of the state, resulting in destruction and inequality. You can not make unr…
/r/MensRights01/06/12 07:36 PM
1

non-white, lower class girls Look at rates of illegitimate births before the welfare state for blacks- it was a few points lower than whites. Only since the welfare state have the poorer fathers become disposable and the rates of illegitimacy exploded. Yes- the liberal nanny state is the most racist institution to exist- something that broke down the black family to an even greater extent than slavery.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 04:32 PM
4

The welfare state has been a massive failure. It doesn't need to be a little "less sexist." It needs to be gone. The greatness of a free society is that people are free to make moral choices to help the poor. The state inevitably corrupts. Trying to fix the system will never work because it is corrupt at it's core.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 04:30 PM
1

Again- go over to /r/nofap and tell me porn couldn't also further aggravate the problem. Men can't shoulder even a tiny bit of blame for their failures? But let's suppose they were pushed into porn/video games because society abandoned them and it isn't a bit their fault. I don't think continuing to indulge in these vices is going to help them face their problems- nor will it help then achieve their goals. That's sounds like giving up because of a bit of adversity to me.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 04:38 AM
1

inhibits young men's motivation to behave the way society expects them Why are you fixated on societal expectations (which I don't think are necessarily evil although the system is broken)? What about it interfering with their personal goals, regardless of what those are? You should check out /r/nofap and ask what they think about porn and how it has affected their lives. If this is really an issue, it will help men to understand it. Just sitting here and trying to justify it or even champion it…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:44 PM
1

If the symptoms lead to still other problems then they are also worth addressing, no?
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:46 PM
7

You guys realize the author is the same guy that did the recent one on video games and porn? I actually think Zimbardo is a good guy but people here didn't seem to like that other article.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 03:46 AM
2

This isn't just misandry. Thomas Sowell has already diagnosed this problem but he is ignored by the left and the right is terrified of being accused of racism to do anything. Before the welfare state, illegitimacy rates for blacks were only a few points behind whites (don't recall the exact numbers). Yet, after all the social programs meant to fix inequality the problem has exploded. Paying people to be poor and have children clearly doesn't work. It's made men of lower economic means optional i…
/r/MensRights27/05/12 05:11 AM
-1

Well aren't you smart.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:16 PM
2

Regal's policy probably reflects the law (only women get special protections) rather than active sexism on their part. If the law didn't exist, they might search purses as well. I don't think going after private property rights helps. After all, if we deny private property we affirm the principle that pressure groups can control the choices made by people and organizations through the government- that includes pressure groups like feminists.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:13 PM
1

I take conspiracy to apply to human actions, not natural phenomena. People conspire, nature doens't. it is fact that it has caused problems for men. How does one differentiate a fact from mere theory?
/r/MensRights19/05/12 09:06 PM
1

Men aren't the victim of family courts and sexism? A conspiracy theory is merely an explanation for human events. It has come to mean a pejorative. MRM still offers it's own theory for why things are happening in the state and society and it's often traced to feminism.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 08:43 PM
1

Pure science doesn't have an '-ism' Ideally yes- but the science showing differences in the sexes is the same thing as telling women they belong in the kitchen according to feminists. Hardcore feminists literally believe the only difference is genitalia and some fat deposits. they tend to be statistically insignificant. "3.6% of the total" is insignificant? You can look at this and blame 'old boys network' or you can say maybe men and women have different biological imperatives.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:42 PM
-1

MRM is a conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 12:57 AM
2

mildly sexist because it isn't backed up by any research You can't be "mildly" sexist anymore than you can be a "little bit pregnant." Scientific sexism is sexism all the same. It doesn't cease being sexism because it has some research behind it. I don't think sexist observations are wrong as a rule. Only people who don't understand that statistics don't necessitate individual behavior but are observations of group behavior do. Whatever conclusions are drawn from statistics are based on ideology…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 06:59 PM
1

That's bad scientific methodology, I agree. But so is making appeals to emotion. Accusations of a cult are the equivalent of feminists calling the MRM whiny men who can't get laid or something. Pointing out bias and facts can accomplish the same thing without the name calling.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 06:44 PM
2

"Conspiracy theory" is a pejorative used to dismiss outsider skeptics. It's a baseless appeal to emotion.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:34 PM
3

That said, Ms. Wilderotter of Frontier believes women are better at multitasking than men. Except when it comes to discriminating against women while making money at the same time- men are clearly experts at that.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:57 PM
2

If you sense of power comes from controlling what someone else thinks or does you'll feel powerless no matter what you do.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:11 AM
89

Why do you suppose that is? Is it simply because women aren't encouraged to consider men as feeling beings? It seems men get that a lot- if there's trouble in a relationship it's naturally because you aren't being considerate to the woman's feelings.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 02:05 AM
6

"Free speech" is a rule requiring that the federal government writes no law curtailing speech. It's a very different matter when one uses shunning or economic incentives. CNN is very free to run articles like this again- but if they sense a large enough amount of displeasure, they may reconsider it.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 04:06 PM
1

The fallacy of composition arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole What am I saying that isn't true about all the parts of the whole? Can you name a business that isn't comprised of individuals? Your fallacy claim is fallacious.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 05:00 PM
1

I understand the policy. I think the policy is wrong because it infringes on personal freedom. I'm also not alone on this. Many understand that economic freedom is a subset of personal freedom. A very powerful example is the state's war on natural foods. When organic stores and people wishing to buy raw milk are being prosecuted and food being destroyed by police with machine guns, I wonder how you think this doesn't interfere with a right to simply exist. When free exchange is a necessary preco…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 12:28 PM
1

You say companies aren't individuals. A company is comprised of individuals is it not? If the government regulates who I choose to work for or buy products from, has it not stepped upon my right to associate with who I please?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 12:04 PM
0

Is doing business with who I please without interference not an individual right?
/r/MensRights19/04/12 11:36 AM
0

Pointing out the costs is a good thing. It's necessary in order to make smarter choices. But pulling back the curtain can either reveal a sort of existential horror or it can garner acceptance. It all depends on the perspective we choose to take. The sort of egalitarianism that takes issue with nature is a source of neurosis. It leads to the sort of MGTOW with it's anger fueled undertones. I don't think it leads to happiness. Men and women are meant to come together. Reconciliation seems wiser t…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 10:50 PM
0

I don't know- being a beast of burden carries some negative connotations. I don't disagree with the logical analysis but you inject a lot of value judgments. I think there are costs involved but also benefits. You seem fixated on the costs in the same way feminists looked merely at the costs of being a home maker- for instance, their lowered income over their life span while completely ignoring the benefits- such as being able to spend more time with her children and the advantages this confers …
/r/MensRights18/04/12 10:06 PM
-1

It's interesting that you see men as wild animals that were brought into the social fold rather than participants of a social order themselves who would "domesticate" themselves for higher ends. This is perhaps better analyzed from a time preference perspective- you can be a wild stallion that steals and cheats their whole life or they can temper those efforts into a productive and creative social order. It is simply an opportunity cost- exchanging freedom (and the dangers therein) for a more st…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 08:47 PM
0

But what is the problem with biology as it is? It's an ideology that claims this and ideologies are relative. Again, the ideology being biological differences are some kind of injustice that must be rectified through violence (the state). It's absurd. Remember the story of Harrison Bergeron? is not the same nature we live in today. As she points out in the video today it is like nature on steroids. As women become more passive and men expected to be more aggressive, the surrendered wife (or sing…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 08:08 PM
1

But if the guy is hanging around, there has to be something there right? Why do men choose to get into these relationships? They must value being in these relationships as "beasts of burden" over being bachelors, otherwise they would remain bachelors. I'm sure there are men and women who prefer a more egalitarian relationship and that is fine. I'm left with what ought to be done in light of these dynamics. As it relates to the MRM and feminism, it sheds light on a mentality that might encourage …
/r/MensRights18/04/12 08:03 PM
2

GWW's and TyphonBlue's conclusion of the "surrendered wife" issue is that women need to rise up to the challenge. I think they also would agree a more equitable role is ideal. Okay- maybe. This seems to me creating a problem where there isn't one. Yes, the surrendered wife is bad if we adopt an egalitarian outlook. This to me is the sort of neuroticism/Puritanism that pervades the western outlook- that we should conform to certain ideal types to get along. The neuroticism comes out of being unab…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 08:03 AM
0

This is a Norwegian documentary but I imagine it's pretty similar in Sweden: http://www.mrctv.org/videos/brainwashing-norway-part-1-gender-equality http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/on-trial-for-the-truth/
/r/MensRights18/04/12 05:08 AM
1

I see your point and would agree. But why is the "culture minister" participating in a display that is so tasteless and bizarre? Just because a handful of weirdos think this is "art," doesn't mean a public official who should represent the country ought to host an event like that. At least, that's what my westernized, patriarchal understanding of decency would lead me to believe but that might be misogynist and racist of me to say...or something.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 04:49 AM
1

"Oppress" all depends on your perspective. You could say men were oppressed by women because they were expected to work by women, their families and their community. Male layabouts were lower than dirt. So to not work a job, mainly menial labor in those days, would make you a social pariah. Sounds close to slavery. But I wonder how societies without a productive role for men fare? Not nearly as well as the west has for these so-called oppressive conditions- oppression to which we owe a level of …
/r/MensRights13/04/12 02:48 AM
6

I think SRS is mostly men.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 09:00 PM
13

You'd probably be more comfortable as a leader. Next time explain what the situation is. If you step up and explain what needs to be done in a direct manner and assign jobs then they'll probably straighten up. Calling someone a motherfucker is only leveling in that you drop to their level. They might then work resentfully whereas bringing some positive leadership would actually make people want to join in. You're probably used to getting told what to do. That's our educational system. If you got…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 04:44 AM
13

Standing up for yourself isn't a skill men are taught to hone. It's more of a suck it up skill.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 04:29 AM
5

I'm pretty sure everyone knows by now you don't believe everything on the internet but you take it at face value on the off chance it really happened. I'm sure if it was a woman was raped and the story sounded implausible you would question it personally but still offer support. It's just the decent thing to do I think.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 04:03 AM
2

Are they aware she tried to steal your seed?
/r/MensRights04/04/12 02:24 AM
-4

I take female agency to mean their role in the objectification of their bodies. A woman can just as easily dress conservatively as she can wear a low cut shirt- or go completely naked in this case. The problem is when they want human biology and reality to conform to their expectations of the world while denying their own role.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 02:13 AM
-7

Where is female agency in this case? It is just our jobs as men to avert are gaze or we've committed some great offense? And it seems very odd because the purpose of the burqa is so that women aren't sexually objectified.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 08:26 PM
10

Sexual objectification by men is said to oppress women. It's a recurring theme in feminist ideas.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 08:24 PM
10

Can you please explain how women voluntarily getting drunk at parties is a result of patriarchy?
/r/MensRights22/03/12 08:38 PM
0

Females (gender is really irrelevant) can choose to work in environments that are appropriate for them. If one breaks the conduct terms of an employment contract for instance, one can lose that job. On the other hand, the state does not have a right to force a code of conduct into any employment contract. Meanwhile men and women are really sexually harassed everyday by the TSA. I don't think government is a solution to these things.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 09:32 PM
3

That it is an "equal-harassment" workplace is a weak argument if we accept that principle that "harassment" is a crime. Harassment is such a broad and subjective term that just about anything can be construed as harassment and is very much open to abuse. This needs to be an issue between employers and employees. Not the state.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 08:42 PM
5

doesn't mean other people should have to put up with that shit (a.k.a., harassment.) Then they can choose not to work there. It is not the state's business in controlling who you wish to associate with. I personally find an environment where everything that comes out of your mouth must pass a PC filter as a form of harassment- harassment is a relative term based on a certain perspective. If a company wants to make a more female friendly environment to attract more female workers then so be it. B…
/r/MensRights21/03/12 08:32 PM
1

To serve what purpose? Why is it important to list them? Again- I'd like somebody to define "hate."
/r/MensRights18/03/12 02:20 AM
1

Christians would glee in seeing 'sodomites' given the death penalty whether they can admit it You can read minds? I don't think this passes for credible evidence.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 01:13 AM
1

Is a hate group. On the same level of violent neo-nazis? If MRA's start aligning along an anti-women or anti-gay agenda This is about questioning the SPLC's veracity. Not aligning with anyone.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 01:10 AM
-1

Define "hateful." Do any of those groups advocate violence? Why would they be put on the same level of a violent supremacist group? With such loosely defined terms they cease to have any meaning and can't be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 08:54 PM
1

the business may put some money towards insurance Business put up a lot because it's tax free compensation. The premiums will go up (no such thing as a free lunch) so no- the business will pay more. it's the organisations who are trying to infringe on each of their workers individual religious freedom to choose Define "infringe." Not paying for your employees BC is infringing on their religious freedom? I don't follow.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 06:28 AM
4

If you don't see the issues that are making us feel that way you must have your heads in the sand. So...let's talk about your feelings. There's a mandate where employers are forced to pay for contraception. Jolly. Now the GOP opposes this mandate and now this is war on women? Really? Are there bombs being dropped on women? Getting shot at? And in a figurative sense-, not forcing your boss to buy your BC (which you are perfectly free to buy on your own) is war? Normally I would be a little disqui…
/r/MensRights17/03/12 06:19 AM
4

I mean it's religious people trying to control contraception and sexual freedom, Opposing a mandate requiring employers to buy something for their employees is controlling them? Nobody is advocating stopping them from using their cash to pay for themselves.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 06:06 AM
0

an attack on all women Didn't you know? Women are an alien race part of one interconnected neural-network a la Ender's Game.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 06:02 AM
6

They don't not even discuss what they're referring to in the whole thing just that "We women" must fight for reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 10:58 PM
3

I guess I deserved that for clicking a submission titled "beeber fever."
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:38 AM
21

Ron Paul and Judge Napolitano are on their list. http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/55913.html The SPLC isn't really taken seriously.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 04:22 AM
2

the lefties with the righties, the liberal with the conservative. Liberals and conservatives as in American politics are both very much pro-feminist. That is just too confusing. Both terms are way too loaded to be useful descriptors.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 04:03 AM
0

You: born without brain.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 08:17 PM
0

That's not the point. It's wrong when it happens to women too. Work is done with the body. If a woman owns her womb, a man owns his hands and mind. The product of which, is not the state's but that man's.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 06:13 PM
-2

Regardless, if you want to argue about self-ownership regarding abortion, the same logic applies to the income tax. Work is something you do with your body.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 06:12 PM
3

But we do let the government control men's bodies! An income tax essentially claims ownership of a man's body (at least the labor of that man's mind and body) for at about 4 months of the year, depending on your tax bracket. Often than not to pay into a system which women draw from more than men.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 03:05 AM
5

Blocking sites unless you pay extra and all that. The thing is, it's fear over something that has never happened. In fact, it's really the government that wants to censor the net.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 04:01 AM
6

Net neutrality the concept is separate from legislative efforts. The last time net neutrality was an issue was when the FCC (which has regulated radio and television much to the benefit of the big media companies) tried to assume control of the web (they called it net neutrality to confuse people) which he opposed. It's pretty complicated. He believes in letting the market, providers and so on, compete. I guess you can call that "regulation" but it's really just leaving it be as it is. If it ain…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 02:56 AM
3

He voted in favor of net neutrality I very much doubt he'd ever vote to give the government more authority to regulate the net.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 02:29 AM
2

This book is a survey of the theories regarding sexual evolution and that includes the brain and how it relates to sexual selection: http://www.amazon.com/Red-Queen-Evolution-Human-Nature/dp/0060556579/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1330025047&sr=8-2 Here is a documentary which shows this conflict between the social "sciences" and biological science as it relates to mental dimorphism: http://www.mrctv.org/videos/brainwashing-norway-part-1-gender-equality
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:35 PM
6

That's a fair point. However, like I wrote above I think what he says should at least be heard. I don't think you can ignore the impact he's made in a climate that has an overwhelming feminist consensus.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 04:47 AM
9

I hope you recognize that becoming a misogynist probably does you no good and is certainly not a logical conclusion to failing with women. Everybody will have friends who burn them at some point- I don't think the conclusion to then become a misandrist or misanthropist. And another thing- if your failures with women is an outcome of internalizing beliefs advocated by a feminist/egalitarian culture, it's kind of letting them win by just giving up.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 04:36 AM
5

Given that we're allowed to be politically incorrect here about biological dimorphism, I think that we need to recognize that this outlook is nonsense. It begins with the assumption that men and women ought to have the same level playing field and guys are just victims in the whole affair. One must recognize that women biologically are hypergamous- often this is seen as marrying up financially but I think it also means marrying up socially, that is, to a leader. This is like women lamenting that…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 04:26 AM
5

Cultural marxism- divide and conquer.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 12:07 AM
3

I wonder if it's biological or ideological.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 06:50 AM
4

Poverty has stagnated since the start of the war on poverty. There's some ridiculous amount spent- like 25,000 per family? You could just write them a check and end poverty overnight. It's a make work program (often for unemployable feminists.)
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:00 AM
4

vital social programs that dredged us up from the depths of poverty Are leftists in a competition to outdo one another with the histrionics? I mean, it's almost funny. At any rate, he opposes Federal involvement in those things. I mean ffs, the cherished Sweden is roughly the size of any U.S. state- and as a matter of logistics, would be more effective to have it at a state level anyway. The federal budget is a monstrosity that will destroy the U.S. dollar. And welfare as a Men's Rights issue? U…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:58 AM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pL6CKrIpyTs This stupid idea gets repeated again and again but it is based on an article he authored opposing PC speech when it comes to Christmas and government. E.g., preventing government employees from saying Merry Christmas, decorate trees or whatever.* The other part is that he opposes Roe V. Wade because it was legislating from the bench. (This is open to debate but that is his stance.) The separation of church and state being not having the state favor any …
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:41 AM
1

Regarding conspiracies, I think there is a trend wherein a conglomerate of different interests act in concert giving the appearance of one grand conspiracy. Wherever an ideology can be used to justify the ends of those powers, it will be sort of assimilated by the powers that be. Noble may the ideals of feminism, universal education, environmentalism or what have you be- they manifest primarily where they reinforce or expand the existing system. For example, public schooling might ideally seek t…
/r/MensRights26/01/12 11:10 PM
2

Let me rephrase that- I mean self-reliant with respect to the state. When the mother becomes dependent on the state, it drives a wedge between the family. The state in a sense becomes the father/mother while the biological father/mother are busy working to pay for the aforementioned apparatus.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 09:11 PM
3

It's not their stated intent of the feminists to raise more tax revenue but it is the net result. As such, there is a vested interest in the state to promote it. We also know that feminism creates more social needs (e.g., in child care, education, health care), hence there are many feminists that work within those institutions because it reinforces their own job prospects. It is not in their interest to promote self-reliant motherhood.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 06:50 PM
1

I already submitted this here. edit: Nevermind. Typos are fine too.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 05:51 PM
2

What benefit is there to accept the traditional role for men? Why should they sacrifice themselves for women unwilling to reciprocate? What's the point of manning up?
/r/MensRights15/01/12 04:49 AM
1

Does the average women live up to their expectations to be a traditional 'woman'?
/r/MensRights15/01/12 03:58 AM
7

Yes- men are waking up the fact that trying to raise a family and succeed in a roller-coaster economy while paying a third or more of their income into the welfare/warfare state is a shitty deal. They're waking up to the fact that getting blown up in wars of aggression to line the pockets of oil companies and the military industrial complex isn't how they imagined serving their country. (Judging by the fact that Ron Paul vastly outdoes the other candidates in campaign donations from servicemen.)…
/r/MensRights14/01/12 10:49 PM
3

not subject even in theory to the popular vote. Individuals are subject to the market. If people do not like your product, they will go elsewhere. Consider government schools or health care- there are no alternatives and that is why it sucks. Costs inflate out of control and quality falls because there is no competition and the government will be lobbied by those groups for more money. 50% of all healthcare spending in the U.S. is state spending, and is nominally more than many European governme…
/r/MensRights14/01/12 02:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter