TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

omega21xx Archive

View 2 posts and 353 comments by omega21xx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

omega21xx/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:42 AM
1

omega21xx/r/MensRights03/05/12 01:33 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It's obviously that smile, just look at him. Probably thinking about all the ways he can oppress those women.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:43 AM
8

The book is called "Stand By Your Manhood" and they probably are just referring to how they (as a trans-woman) did not, and just removed it instead. That seems the most likely, however they may mean something entirely different than the joke.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:15 PM
7

Safer workplace/work conditions on there twice. Probably other things redundant as well, too lazy to skim it again.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 04:40 AM
3

I'm not sure why you are being downvoted, what you said is more or less completely true. I've worked at retailers that carried alcohol for quite a while, and with the way it works in wal-mart for example is each item is listed in departments, everything being entered manually (not scanned mind you, which is very important) can be entered under "food" and listed with any name and price.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:12 PM
6

Being able to finish each others sentences shows how close-nit our sub is! :D
/r/MensRights17/07/13 04:53 AM
-1

Men have more to lose IMO if they don't take the pill. I doubt many would forget to take it seeing as they can't abort (financial abortion) like women can. Women have plenty after the fact options where as men have absolutely 0. If you can't trust your partner to take the pill don't have sex, or use a secondary contraception.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:58 PM
1

I'm already partially in debt and there isn't a way without living on the street. The decision I've made is the best path and I know how to not be miserable going the way I've chosen. Not having a roof over my head would ultimately make me more miserable on top of her being vindictive by not letting me see my son. Seeing my son > not dealing with her BS.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:40 PM
1

What I'm trying to say is, if I leave, not only will I have to pay for court, but also child support. I would be on the streets, literally. I don't have friends or family within even 1000 miles. I moved here so SHE could be with her family as I was more of a loner to begin with. I didn't care much for spending time with friends. When I've made friends, they move away for various reasons and we lose contact. Honestly, if I made more I would make the move, but I am not dealt the hand I wish I had.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:11 PM
-1

That doesn't make since to me, they would have to have the guy's phone. I've never seen a text billing program that worked without texting from the phone to be enrolled, or using a credit card online with the phone number attached. Can you provide a link or a better explanation as this doesn't seem to work from my point of view. EDIT: nevermind, somehow I missed to "give your phone" part in the image. EDIT2: I don't even like letting my SO use my phone, much less a stranger, but i can see how so…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 10:30 PM
1

Is anyone really dumb enough to text a 5-digit number though? I have a problem with "the creepy guy" shit they pull all the time, but a 5-digit number of 9 and 0 is pretty obvious is a text service of some kind.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 09:59 PM
3

Not sure if this has already been mentioned, but take it up with the school board and the principle, the school board often has decision making power over the principle and is your best bet to correct this.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 06:23 PM
3

Her mother is the same way, and she doesn't take criticism well, even when politely addressed. If it was a 3rd party, regardless of what is said, addressing her problems she would regard as them "taking my side" or grow more violent because she already hates me talking about her or our relationship. Reddit is my outlet pretty much as it's the only place she doesn't stalk me. Honestly, I know how to deal with her and I know me and my child are safe. She isn't that unstable to get herself in legal…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:47 PM
10

Oh trust me I know. I just can't until my kid gets old enough to decide who he wants to live with. A custody battle without my son's decision would be too costly on my crap wage. I've been keeping tabs on our conversations and what she does for a long time, and I'm sure my son will see that side in her when he is old enough. Just takes time...
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:19 PM
4

...She literally destroyed $2000+ worth of amazing gaming hardware... My SO does similar, breaking my stuff, but it's always something i can fix or is under $200. If she ever went this far and broke my gaming rig, it'd be over, nothing to salvage of our relationship.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 07:18 PM
2

I'll have you know I've had very manly facial hair since I was in highschool! This 21 yo will have a glorious stache for this occasion!
/r/MensRights01/11/12 11:16 PM
1

Yes, but the purpose is to keep a backup in a safe place. Having it on your phone, it could get wiped and you would be left with nothing. It's the same as keeping a NAS to backup all your data, or using cloud storage. A hard drive can fail, be wiped, ect. just like your phone.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 06:09 PM
6

If using android, use SMS backup+ It will automatically backup all texts to your gmail, including MMS/picture messages. I've been using this for quite a while for the same reasons as OP.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 07:00 PM
1

That's the problem, it's obvious that there must have been another reason. Which is why I say not to draw conclusions without the other half. I didn't mean to imply you hated him. Also, I don't think an injured wrist requires help getting dressed, however depending on how far along, he may not have needed to help her. Part of physical therapy is small steps to regain strength and heal. Maybe she expected his help but did not need it. Honestly, I think this conversation should be put to rest sinc…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:34 PM
1

Also, if the wife is your friend and not the husband, that could give a bit of a bias on either you or what she tells you (because friends typically wouldn't want to look bad in another friend's eyes). Who knows, either way, I just don't like drawing a broad conclusion based on my own experience which could be flawed like you or I mentioned.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:58 PM
1

I still find it hard to believe that you haven't seen any women act in this way, since it's not uncommon between either sex IMO. I'm not of the opinion that a marriage could be saved if one is already planning divorce.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:44 PM
1

If he regrets the divorce that kind of shows that your "he didn't want her around so he ignored her" reasoning is flawed in this particular case. That was my point in saying you don't have the whole story, and the wife's side doesn't necessarily say much more than half. And now you imply that he may have broke her wrist (with no evidence). Seriously, you sound like you are trying to find a reason to hate this guy without knowing his side. Continue drawing conclusions I guess.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:36 PM
1

When you ignore a woman to death because you don't want her around it at least it makes sense. When she then divorces you and you follow her 400 miles to be with her because you didn't think you had to make an effort, well, get a clue sooner dude. It's fairly obvious you are giving a reason that you don't know for this guy. If he didn't want her around, and that was why he was ignoring her, why would he move with her? Sounds like he had a different reason entirely for ignoring her. Since we are …
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:43 PM
1

That is how a lot of guys resolve problems. There is nothing wrong with it, however there would be a lot more guys confiding in their loved ones or friends if there wasn't a stigma toward men expressing problems. I too tend to keep my problems to myself. It's just easier that way IMO.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:32 PM
1

Mistakes in relationships will ALWAYS happen. There is no such thing as a fairytale relationship with no mistakes, issues, arguing, ect. Don't be naive...
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:28 PM
1

I got the idea, because it was easy enough for you to draw a conclusion for the gender as a whole, based on two guys. Don't be a dick, is advice both women and men should learn. Either way, I'm sorry for your experience. I just don't think it's as drastic as "women don't do this, only men do because I know 2 guys that did and not a single woman." I'm not making excuses however. Just explaining that your two man experience isn't nearly enough to draw a conclusion.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:16 PM
3

Acting like they don't exist is exactly the same as distancing yourself from them. Distancing yourself of course is more general with an extreme and an opposite, with it's own extreme. You're acting as if women don't do this too. I'm sorry that two guys you know somehow soured your idea of all men, but this isn't gendered at all. On the point of acting as if they are doing them a favor, isn't that even more common among women? Acting as if guys are "lucky" to be with them. I see this sort of "fa…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:22 AM
7

About the sneaky part, I know I've read an article about women being "better" at hiding affairs. This could be for multiple reasons of course, but I can't exactly site any numbers from it since I can't find it at the moment. I believe it has been posted on here before though. Either way, what you've stated is only your personal experience, as is mine. There isn't really any non-bias studies to site either way. From my experience, I've had plenty of women become distant, and either find them chea…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:43 AM
9

Sounds like anyone in a dying relationship to me, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:35 AM
12

You mean, if you want to be single, you just act like it? Do you mean cheating? Which both genders do almost equally?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:50 AM
4

Now that you mention it, I see what you mean. It's late, haven't had much sleep. However the idea of vigilante justice like this without proof or any evidence that they actually committed a crime scares me. I've been falsely accused of rape before by a cheating ex and the thought that someone she was cheating on me with could have ignored all due process and stabbed me in my ear drum was pretty crazy. Of course it could always be much worse though. Just a thought I was having when reading this. …
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:32 AM
1

If you are on android, SMS Backup+ If the app isn't found on "Google Play" you can enable 3rd party source apps and download the apk from the internet. It's a free app which is always nice. If you are on an iPhone, then the only one (i could find) similar is a paid app called "iPhone SMS to Gmail" but there may be others. Be sure to find an app that supports backing up MMS and SMS messages if you are using an iPhone.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:08 PM
2

There is "iPhone SMS to Gmail" but it's a paid app. The SMS Backup+ I use, is a free app that will backup MMS messages as well, so I'd suggest looking into that feature in whatever you find, otherwise MMS messages that contain text/photos won't be saved.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:15 PM
5

I currently use SMS Backup+ on android. There was a similar app in the early days of my HTC Hero also, but no longer works with my phone. SMS Backup+ will back up all text messages to the Gmail you select into a tab/label called "SMS" with the phone number and contact name if applicable. I also used something similar (in combination with a protection app) on a phone I was paying for, but let my ex use... Easy way to confirm the cheating... but damn it was disturbing...
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:00 AM
5

Before I even knew of Men's rights I was doing things like this. Never felt safe at any step with my word against another, even more so against a woman. My family made it very apparent to me with how they treated my sister's accusations against my brother and I. Now that I'm older it makes perfect sense why I act this way. Not like my SO gives me much choice anyway. Sorry for the random personal story. Hope your situation pans out well for you. :)
/r/MensRights18/09/12 12:52 AM
6

Even with my current SO, it may seem underhanded since we are still together, but I have an auto-backup app on my phone for all text messages I've ever received/sent. She thinks I do it for her to see what I'm saying to who, but it's really to defend myself against her in the future. When accusations from women have more weight than evidence (socially and legally), it helps to keep as much documentation as possible.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 12:37 AM
2

My saying "this is the hand we are dealt" I did not mean to imply that men have to accept what they are given. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:31 PM
3

They still have the decision to abandon the baby, adopt, ect. Men have no such right in that regard. Pro-life or not, it's not equal/fair.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 09:35 PM
1

You're in my... er... positive feels. Thank you, I shall accept said positive feels. Let this be an object lesson to young men reading this. Unfortunately you should not be having sex with a woman you're not willing to have babies with in this day and age. I agree, right now it's in no way safe. Not to say all women or even most will try to use entrapment (many positive benefits for her with almost no negative backlash, unless she has morals/manners/respect) but it's better to not take a chance …
/r/MensRights15/09/12 09:10 PM
3

Well, I'm a willing father, but she's a horrible mother. I wasn't willing to the idea of having a child with her. That's why I wanted an abortion or out. However, this is the hand we are dealt as men. I will not go to jail, and I will be a better parent to my child than her. When he is old enough he will know who he wants to be with, he will see how she treats me, and how she even treats him. I honestly can't see it ending nicely for her, but my son and I will be happy one day.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 08:54 PM
2

And the answer is never have sex, if you are a man. For women? Go ahead, your only problem is making the decision if you want a child if it happens, because fuck men, right?
/r/MensRights15/09/12 08:51 PM
4

Yes, it's wrong, and if she found out you did that to her, you would be in deep shit legally. I went through the same thing though, except I decided to stay with her, for the sole reason of waiting until my son is old enough to decide who he wants to live with. CS is BS and getting custody would be expensive as hell. I could not pay either CS or court battles so the easiest way, for me at least, seems to be to wait. Even though she ultimately makes me feel like shit daily, it's better than being…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 08:45 PM
-1

hplyrikz posts something not sexist? This is a first. Most of that page's first pictures were "all boyfriends cheat! BLARG!"
/r/MensRights11/08/12 04:34 PM
1

Not an idiot who can't composite hypothetical situations onto my reality and not get a good impression of what the actual experience is like. That's like saying "i could imagine going to war, and coming back having PTSD, I know exactly how you feel because I imagined what it would be like having PTSD." Not only are people going to find your imaginative view a bit skeptic, the people who actually went through said situation won't feel you actually know how it feels and may even be offended, and h…
/r/MensRights07/08/12 06:32 PM
2

it's very difficult to traumatize a male in the same way as a female in the context of rape. First, are you male? If so, have you been raped? If yes, how do you know you were less traumatized than a female in the same situation? women are taught SO much less of this stoic frame of mind than men. It's not their fault, you'll do the same to your own kids without ever realizing it. Actually, I have a child and they won't be taught any different than their opposite gender would be. I'll be sure of t…
/r/MensRights07/08/12 03:13 AM
1

Or just try it here when you click reply. Men's and Misandry both get the "not a word" treatment.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 11:11 PM
2

They are made for the often quite intellectually challenged rapists. Precisely, so why is it targeting men instead of being gender neutral? Women rape as well, so it's not a gendered crime.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:55 PM
4

Yeah, there isn't nudity, but I see this could be bad at work since far away, someone could think it's suggestive.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 08:06 PM
1

It's a gender slur according to some.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 08:28 PM
1

Yeah, you're probably right, but I know some girls with a steam account just to have and chat, so I figured that might be the case.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:50 PM
1

Counter report, (report her group back) I was not saying I was going to go off making threats, but everyone likes to assume the worst.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:48 PM
-7

Anyone know of any specific "girl's only" groups to target? Specifically the one she might be involved with, I'd like to counter report. EDIT: Wow, everyone jumped to the "I'm going to harass her" conclusion. Sorry, I had the wrong impression of what was going on (new info at the top of this thread when I woke up).
/r/MensRights03/08/12 06:20 AM
2

This was my exact thought as well!
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:43 AM
6

As much as I hate to admit it, compliments about men as a group are so rare that this one actually moved me. I agree, It was strange reading that, but somehow comforting.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 06:20 PM
2

Yes. I feel she should have got a job at some point. She told me she didn't want a child until she was in her 30's and would abort if pregnant. Sure enough, some how she got pregnant and decided, "nope, keeping it, you're fucked" which is partially what I'm talking about. She made a bad decision, I'm stuck with her bad decision. Honestly, I would have left and just paid child support, but if I'm going to get fucked over I might as well get to be with my child and raise him better than his mom co…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 05:25 PM
9

Please go to /r/SuicideWatch this isn't the place to be asking for help in killing yourself. You need to seek help from friends or family in your situation. Hope you feel better and don't kill yourself, it's a means to an end, not a solution.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:25 AM
3

It was kind of scary reading that, glad it worked out though.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:23 AM
2

If I lived in the UK I would sign. (Petition states you must live in the UK and provide an address)
/r/MensRights01/08/12 02:55 AM
2

I don't know what it is, but kids I don't know, like me, and will come up to ask me questions or wave. Almost a daily thing. Women however tend to have the "stay away from me" look at all times or get angry at their kids for waving at me.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 01:50 AM
1

Awesome, have an upvote for being a responsible person! :)
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:59 PM
2

Meh, I always think if you can't pay everything by yourself in the event of a divorce, then you probably either shouldn't get married and/or have a kid. They are both huge decisions that people make too rashly. I'm not married, and will never be because it's just a bad decision IMO. If she left me though, I'm confident I would have custody, if not, I could still pay CS. TL;DR: People need to plan for the worst before making big decisions. Really not a long enough post to require it, but it's the…
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:49 PM
6

That's understandable, but if they aren't old enough for school and you don't have money to pay daycare yourself already, you've probably made a bad decision in becoming a parent in the first place. Either way, it really depends on where you live. Some states have really cheap housing/apartments for 400-/+ (including all utilities except electric), $350 is more than enough for food for two, everything else that is being paid varies way to much, but it should be pretty simple to see how someone m…
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:32 PM
12

Daycare isn't required, the mom could get a job to work around the school schedule. However, a total of 800, minus 600 for daycare, comes to 200, and regardless of how small people think it is, it's more than enough. This is coming from someone who supports my SO, child, and myself on $1600 a month before tax. She does not work, and I still have money left over each month. Anyone that thinks a child needs $800+ by themselves is over exaggerating or has high standards.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:16 PM
5

Your mother was supposed to cover the other half. Your dad was to pay $400 to support you and your mom was to cover another $400 herself.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:46 PM
3

But, you're a guy you MUST have done something wrong! /s
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:00 AM
1

I'm willing to help if you need anymore.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 04:46 AM
2

You haven't really responded to anything I said... Your response was directed at OP, I didn't know you expected a full response from every reply. I still maintain that calling this instance a rape undermines the trauma that millions suffer on a daily basis. Please, explain how this undermines the trauma others face? To claim one person "had it worse" doesn't change anything. It doesn't make them feel better, it doesn't somehow make other victims feel better. All you are doing is making it seem l…
/r/MensRights30/07/12 11:51 PM
9

Sounds like you are trying to make the OP feel as though their experience was less important/severe than another victim's. If you ask me, you are belittling the OP and telling them to feel "lucky" that he wasn't penetrated instead.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 10:50 PM
1

It's fairly common to hear people claim it's the guys fault for not pushing the girl off. If they are feminist though, then you are probably right.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 08:44 PM
3

Convicted with sexual assault. How is this sexual assault and not rape? Is it because OP is a male? Using "You could have pushed her off" sounds like you are trying to blame the victim for being raped.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 08:19 PM
1

What the most MRA's seems to have a problem with is how the system is set up to facilitate and reward false accusastions of rape . I agree, but for some it's touchy. Personally, if the accused name isn't made public, and they throw out the guilty until proven innocent crap, i think we would be in much better shape. Then if the accused actually did have any damages due to court (fees, work time lost, ect.) and have a solid case to prove the accusation false they could bring about their own case. …
/r/MensRights29/07/12 06:02 PM
2

But men are in power politically. Who voted for them to be? 55% of the vote is women... If women really wanted more women in office, just vote. Is it not a case of "who is the better candidate" or "who will pander to me more?" CEOs Yes, that less than 1% of the world that men happen to be more of, you honestly think that men aren't more often higher in careers due to more women CHOOSING to be stay at home mom's? I don't see how feminism can be so demonized by the media to the point where you'll …
/r/MensRights29/07/12 08:53 AM
12

I agree that is part of the problem, however do you not feel that some of the perceptions of men today are created by feminism and the media? There are legitimate issues outside of societal influences that affect men as well.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:47 AM
5

You believe the problems of men are created by men, patriarchy, or something along those lines. That isn't how the majority of the MR view the cause of the problem.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:34 AM
12

You claimed that MR classifies every accusation of rape, that doesn't bring about a conviction, is a false accusation. The only times we call a rape accusation false, is when they are PROVEN false, not thrown out. Like the case of Brian Banks were the accuser admitted it was false years later. We also don't believe false accusations are common, there is really no way to be certain, we bring it up a lot, because it's constantly touted as being so rare that it doesn't happen. People need to be awa…
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:26 AM
11

I agree. So far I haven't seen any particular post that would warrant anyone's animosity, however most of OP's comments are getting downvoted when they just asked a question. We don't have to agree, but please play nice guys. Just asking, you guys are free to do whatever of course.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:18 AM
9

Sorry, how may I clarify better?
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:13 AM
3

I don't feel you are demonizing men by being cautious. Everyone has a right to take precautions to prevent things that may happen. EDIT: the demonizing i most readily think of is things like the "men can stop rape" campaigns, among other things. If I was walking around at night I would avoid people in general however instead of being selective.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:12 AM
17

I believe most here would consider radical feminists as the "abort all male babies" "castrate all men" type. Depending on your passion, you may be closer to what some call a militant feminist. Judging from your OP, I would assume you aren't a radical feminist because you state you don't hate men, and you haven't mentioned castrating or aborting male babies. Your perception of feminism, seems to be that you want equality for both sexes. However the feminism with actual power is wrong and has a ma…
/r/MensRights29/07/12 12:01 AM
2

Your advice deserved an upvote, but the Go reference was definitely my first reason for upvoting, more people need to at least try Go.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 05:46 PM
1

I haven't actually visited it, but the oatmeal has made their own digg/reddit. If you enjoy their comics, they might have a good community already starting up.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 04:54 PM
1

To be clear I wasn't talking about Ehrenreich or anyone in particular. Post quality has diminished and there are plenty new concern trolls among other things. I was only providing more to the point brought up by the OP.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 04:51 PM
1

This isn't the first post of this type. It won't be the last either. I'm not angry so I don't know where you're getting that. Calling someone an extremist and saying the word "bullshit" kind of makes me think you are, currently, a little upset. Also, this had nothing to do with misogyny and everything to do with people who most often attack others within the MRM for beliving in working with both sides. Sorry, I figured with the amount of votes going around about this thread being misogynistic, a…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 01:47 AM
9

If you notice the amount of downvotes most threads seem to accumulate, even on sensible, factual, unbiased posts, either /r/MensRights is being being infiltrated just to be brought down, or there are a lot of feminists who hate MR and want to shut down everything with downvotes. Honestly, I've only been here a few months, but it has progressively gotten worse with the past 8k new subscribers that I've seen.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 01:38 AM
3

Extremist? A post with maybe a hint of misogyny, makes someone an extremist? Wow, everyone says shit someone won't like, so calm the hell down.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 01:31 AM
1

Fronting the bill as having to pay up? Depends on who makes the money, but yeah, women are rarely given the debts and are given more opportunities to get more from divorce than men, who are more often screwed over due to kids, property, alimony, ect.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 11:19 PM
3

Thanks, backs up the last point I made.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 10:41 PM
8

CNN prefers men as organic Kevlar. Nicely put though, thank you.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 09:24 PM
3

Adultery happens on both sides of the fence. The one and only link I've ever posted states that 70% of men admit to adultery, and 60% of women admit to adultery. Of course no one ever wants to admit to being a shitty person, and in general is more likely for women not to admit wrongs.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 09:12 PM
1

When my SO had the baby (baby will be 7 months old next week) they had to cut her vaginal tissue a bit to help release the baby, some women have to have this done, and they sew you back up a bit. From the women i've slept with that have had kids, there wasn't anything note worthy to say their vagina had been destroyed and my SO did not feel "loose" after having the baby like some would like to think a baby causes. Most women heal very well after the baby, but they tend to get stretch marks among…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 10:27 PM
1

I agree, I've dated women that I honestly thought were attractive, then after they cheated found that I could no longer say I thought they were attractive. Also found it happens the other way, where I didn't find someone physically attractive, but as we were friends, they became more physically attractive to me. There is a certain degree of actions, personality, ect. that make an impression on how someone looks IMO.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:00 PM
3

I feel it was an overreaction on the friend's part. However pregnancy doesn't destroy vaginas. I will admit it is somewhat humorous to say if you said it lightly to a friend, but destroyed vaginas are pretty doubtful product of pregnancy/birth.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 07:32 PM
25

Child support is meant to pay for half of what it takes to raise a child, she must cover the other half. It's not your problem unless she gets some sort of court order to increase the amount you pay.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 08:14 PM
3

I just say, "So, possibly killing a child for some religious or hygiene purpose is fine?"
/r/MensRights14/07/12 11:22 PM
9

Tumblr = Feminist breeding ground. Should we ignore it, or attempt to destroy their seeds of tyranny with well argued debate? I'm just going to ignore it for now.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 02:34 AM
1

Hurray for more over used phrases? :D
/r/MensRights13/07/12 01:03 AM
4

I assume they are not married, if they are, he may have SOME right's, if they aren't married however, she has all the power to leave and never let him see the child and force child support. Why exactly did she run from him? It's strange to think someone would go so far to avoid their partner being involved in their child's life. The way it sounds is she wants a free monthly paycheck from him.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:31 PM
2

Thank you for this! Never heard of someone seeing that from the phrase, thought I was the only one. (Although I'm not a chemist, I just enjoyed chemistry class back in highschool.)
/r/MensRights12/07/12 09:07 PM
3

Having been a teenager, "look at these stupid teens!" posts, aren't all fake. I was pretty popular with girls in highschool, enough so, that they would talk to me about their problems. There was an over whelming amount of "how do I get my guy to stay" questions revolving around getting pregnant, faking pregnancy, or wanting a child.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 08:50 PM
2

Pretty sure you got downvotes for saying "No Homo." It's a pretty annoying phrase to tack on anything that might question your sexual orientation.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 08:43 PM
9

Bonus if he can get child support or alimony. IMO that would be the best "revenge" possible. This is definitely the best possible revenge you could get, if possible. It's a great reminder to her every month/paycheck that she screwed up your family and is now paying for it literally.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 11:27 PM
5

All this shows is that if you have power/wealth, your offspring are better off than those not born into power/wealth. Pretty obvious waste of resources.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 09:15 PM
1

The title reminds me of what my SO said jokingly one day before giving birth to our son, she wished she could give birth to kittens instead of babies. Her reasons for this were pretty humorous.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 08:49 PM
1

Men's Rights need to gain a larger awareness among society before we can actually work on any large issues. With a large force like feminism, it's easy enough for the inequality and discrimination we speak about, to be squashed and ignored by the majority of society.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 02:30 AM
1

Without r/trees, reddit would be a fraction of it's former self IMO.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 02:00 AM
7

Lol, sure enough the troll Mod I mentioned did their work.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 11:53 PM
10

You have trolls on your moderator list. Can't support this. EDIT: to add to this, most of the people that are mods on this list are new accounts, can't really trust any of the mods. You need a more reputable list of mods IMO.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 11:17 PM
1

Tumblr is just a place for little girls, hipsters, and feminists. Ignore the stupidity and bigotry that pours from that site.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 09:01 PM
0

lol, YES, that changes EVERYTHING! :D
/r/MensRights09/07/12 11:51 PM
-1

Disliking American (Un-American?) =/= disliking Buzz Aldrin. Besides, you're assuming someone is American and care about what it means to be "American" by your standards.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 11:47 PM
1

Precisely, in other words, women have no responsibility for their choices.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 07:48 PM
1

Sorry, when I said its getting opposition it was in regards to male hormonal birth control and/or vasegel. Typically I hear the response that "men can't be trusted" response most often for various reasons.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 09:34 AM
1

Well, honestly I don't think he has any obligation to pay, if anything he can actually BUY the things she needs for their daughter for her rather than giving her spending money.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 12:23 AM
8

Men can go their own way however they please, if someone feels this is what makes them an MGTOW whatever, the only thing I agree with really is that cupcake looking pretty fucking awesome.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 12:21 AM
2

Since they have shared custody though, she wouldn't be able to keep him from his daughter right? I always understood shared custody to work in a way where the only way you could demand CS is when the child spends an uneven amount of time with one. For example, my friend's father can demand CS from the mother since they have shared custody, but the son lives only with the father with no help from the mother. Sorry if I'm wrong, can't find any info to clear this up.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 11:01 PM
2

Those children were an extension of her body, she had a mental disorder, and a man in her life that made her angry, NOT HER FAULT... /s Disclosure: Not sure if these typical excuses for murder perpetrated by women were used, just weighing in on the no charges aspect.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 10:27 PM
3

Personally, I'm just going to jump and get a vasectomy before my situation gets worse. Since it's already getting opposition as "men should trust women with BC" or "this takes away from women's reproductive rights" I'm not going to try and wait for something that may not come soon enough.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 10:19 PM
0

WTF happened here? Some feminist/SRS downvote brigade?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 09:56 PM
5

If they have shared custody and they take care of the child equally, spending around the same time at each other's place, she should not be able to demand child support. Anything he gives, especially if the child is at his place more often than her's, would be from the good of his heart, and can not be forced by law. If I am wrong someone please correct me, this is the way I understand things currently, but may depend on the state.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 09:51 PM
5

As if almost everything isn't already paid for women by the government when pregnant, now women need some sort of payday from men on top of this? It seems like things will just keep getting worse for men as far as having children until babies can be had via incubator.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 09:30 PM
1

As much as I hate tumblr (due to Feminists, hipsters, misinformed children, ect.) I guess I could start one and make some meme's like The Real MRA marmoset.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:43 PM
3

I understand now, thanks for the response. Cool, wasn't trying to sound like a jerk. Also, unrelated, but before I replied I stalked your history (O_o) and made sure you weren't a troll (to clarify, I tend to check whenever someone brings up feminism or SRS, since they aren't exactly normal topics) and happened upon the fact you play Diablo 3. Hope to play a game with ya some time! :) sidenote: not a feminist Personally, I don't care how someone identifies themselves. There are people who identi…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:56 AM
2

Feminism has many definitions which is why you have to be careful. Before I visited this subreddit, I would have defined feminism as wanting equal rights for females. NAFALT (Not all feminists are like that) is a very common response. Honestly, the way I see it, we do generalize feminists due to the fact that those in feminism with power and voice to enact laws and change, have worked against men's rights as well as pushed for very non-egalitarian means. If someone wants to be for women's rights…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:43 AM
5

What people need to understand is that feminism =/= women's rights. Men's rights is in no way against women's rights, feminism however has a hateful ideology and in some cases works to the detriment of men, which obviously creates conflict. I should mention though, coming here and telling Men's Rights how to run their movement isn't exactly welcomed by most. That's like going to /r/feminism or r/srs and telling them the same in reverse. You'll get circled jerked and constant remarks of "wat abou…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:27 AM
2

Lol. ePeen.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:57 AM
2

No worries, don't mind me when I say someone who has the username eSports sounds like a douche. Don't mind me saying anyone who passes judgement on someone based on their style and/or name sounds like a judgemental bigot. It's cool.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:28 PM
1

Depending on your insurance they can be affordable.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:24 PM
1

Does it really matter if someone is gay? Obviously you are trolling or just a bigot.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 05:20 AM
1

Vasectomy. I Wish I would have done it 2 years ago... My father had one, according to him the procedure is pretty easy.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 03:37 AM
1

When my boyfriend drinks too much, I stay awake until he is asleep first. ಠ_ಠ Some of the comments really bother me.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 01:49 AM
1

Never had a single person claim or think my dad was gay, he had ear rings and to top it off, the name Shannon. (Irish)
/r/MensRights04/07/12 12:44 AM
1

As feminists have said before about being able to bear children and such, its a biological inequality, biology isn't always fair and making it fair to the detriment of the other isn't exactly fair either. Now if you don't use the biological inequality excuse then it might make since but currently feminists are just being hypocritical. If it doesn't benefit women they don't care.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:41 AM
1

I've had pretty good success so far. Anecdotal I know, but if you don't mind going public about being an MRA, you'll be surprised that you may actually get some positive responses online from friends. Then again I could just have gotten lucky with who actually saw my posts.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 08:01 PM
1

Men not being as shallow, on average, and willing to have sex with a larger variety of women means they just value women for their vagina? She states everyone that isn't asexual wants sex, but apparently just because women are more selective/shallow, on average than men are, means women are sexually oppressed or idolized? Failed logic at it's best.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 07:49 PM
1

Even if an email is sent, there is no fixing their URL. So it's somewhat a lost cause unless they take down the site and use a less ridiculous/hateful URL.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 07:09 PM
2

You'll only need to worry if there is a draft. If you don't sign and there is one they may try to find you and prosecute you. If you do sign, then you can go out and possibly die due to a sexist law. So your choice really.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 06:53 PM
0

Is it odd that when I first saw the address you listed, I thought a DDoS plan was underway? lol
/r/MensRights30/06/12 06:35 PM
1

Men's right's care about men's and women's right's, not feminism. Feminism =/= women's rights Feminism = Female supremacy + hateful ideology
/r/MensRights30/06/12 05:01 PM
11

like in the UK where the government were trying to bring in equal car insurance costs; the first ones to fight against it were the feminists,saying statistics show men are more likely to crash so it's ok to charge the whole gender more. To add to this: In healthcare, if women pay more for healthcare than men because stats show they use more services and are more expensive to insure, it's WAR ON WOMEN!
/r/MensRights30/06/12 04:52 PM
1

The amount of "this didn't happen, GTFO unless you give proof" in the AMA comments, is disgusting. If a woman had made an AMA about this I doubt anyone would be doing this and instead joking about how women can't rape. -_- Then again, I wasn't able to see it before most of it got deleted.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 04:31 PM
6

Women's rights =/= Feminism Feminism = Female supremacy + hateful ideology
/r/MensRights30/06/12 03:58 PM
1

I had the impression you thought "fighting to fix the pay gap" is a good thing, if it were about discrimination then I'd understand and agree, however studies show otherwise.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 07:59 AM
3

9/10 people make up stats and think they are true.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 01:31 AM
7

Nice post, couldn't have said it better myself.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 12:58 AM
1

Since the wage gap can be mostly shown doesn't exist, up to a few pennies +/-, because of these things among others being factored in, that's why it does not need fighting for. If you fight for something, not knowing the truth, you end up fighting for a lie, which is what the pay gap is. When you fight for it to be fixed, the way it is currently portrayed, you are fighting for female supremacy. Fighting to correct the factors of WHY there is a pay gap (women's choice) then ultimately you are no …
/r/MensRights29/06/12 12:41 AM
1

Claiming equality, while showing no interest other than women's rights has gotten feminism pretty far... So... Not sure if it is so hurtful as you say...
/r/MensRights29/06/12 12:29 AM
1

such as women working less hours traditionally, taking lesser paying jobs that are less dangerous, etc. Hypothetical: If this is a reason for the wage gap, why fight to fix the wage gap? Do women deserve money for choosing to working less hours, choosing to do less dangerous work, choosing to take part time jobs instead of full time jobs, choosing to work less over time? I should mention I chose to emphasis the word "Choice" (and it's other forms) because it was a choice to make less money for w…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 12:17 AM
1

Honest question, can I see any real life, in practice, source for men being given a quota? I have not seen any "We must have at least 40% women and 40% men in this field" jobs.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 11:57 PM
1

legal protection from spousal abuse Weren't you listing things, that they did, that made things equal? There is hardly any recourse for spousal abuse perpetrated by a woman.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 11:40 PM
-2

I'm not fully informed about it, or current healthcare. If there are treatments that men are being excluded in obamacare, when they were previously included in current healthcare, I see a problem. Since I know little of both I only mention DV. Before, and currently, men have never had a shelter, or funding, for abuse and violence, where it is constantly, in every bill from VAWA to obamacare, being provided for women as if men don't get abused or are victims of violence. I'm hurt by it, being a v…
/r/MensRights28/06/12 10:46 PM
5

There is DV also to add to the vasectomy point.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 10:22 PM
-5

75% of DV victims are women, because they weren't making me a sandwich. EDIT: I guess only some misandric/misogynistic jokes are accepted?
/r/MensRights26/06/12 02:37 AM
4

What was more disgusting was that they saw nothing wrong with it when asked about it...
/r/MensRights23/06/12 09:36 PM
1

If you have a recent smart phone, and don't mind spending like 10 bucks on a 16-32 gb sd card, there are apps that will record, and compress the file whilst doing so. I've had a recorder run on my phone for at least a few days when I had 32gb of storage. Never really tested the max.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 05:09 PM
1

When I replied your whole entire first sentence was different, either that or I'm starting to go crazy. O_o I'm not quite sure...
/r/MensRights22/06/12 07:38 AM
1

Must have missed that, thanks.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 02:05 AM
1

Or see feminists advocating for LPS, because it does not benefit women and negatively affects their choice if men have a choice as well.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 11:15 PM
1

They've had pre-birth DNA testing for a while, but there is a risk of complications so not many take that risk and would rather wait. Is this the same or is this new and shown not to possibly complicate pregnancy?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 11:09 PM
1

Holy shit... Glad I moved out of virginia a little over a year ago... Then again it may not be better where I am.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 11:06 PM
3

"Why are most convicted criminals men?" should be what they explore since women are convicted less often due to attributing it to some sort of reverse victimhood among other things, which leads to inequality in court/jury judgment among genders.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 10:42 PM
1

More often than not, schools require... FTFY I have never went to a school (highschool specifically) that allowed me to live in another county, and go to their school. If a kid got expelled, there wasn't another school in the county you could enroll in, you had to get your GED, move, or what...? There weren't many options. I know my experience is purely anecdotal, but having moved most of my life due to family, work, military, I could only find one school that allowed you enroll without owning a…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 10:37 PM
2

Well someone stated "as long as it's not to isolate them." and you rejected this and went back to saying that it's religious people or hippies that do it. Personally I don't really care, it just sounded like you were trying to fight any point brought up. I think public/private school is useful, but it's very rarely the best course. More often than not, schools require you own a residence in the area to actually enroll in their school, so my only options were: Move Homeschool Keep going to the sa…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 09:41 PM
1

Well I guess you could look at it anyway you want since it's just an assumption based on numbers with no correlating reason. You could look at it as "men's rights pays attention to both sides of the issues and feminism only cares out supremacy because they never mention men." If I was so inclined to draw a random conclusion like this.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 09:36 PM
1

This is true, if we don't make cases of these things happening, it just looks like a few whining individuals when there is quite a few who are affected and just don't speak up for fear of backlash, no justice, or flat out think it's acceptable to be a sub-class citizen in relation to women.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 09:26 PM
1

My mom thought of home schooling me after the school had shootings, multiple bomb threats, ect. Not to mention the school's below average quality of learning. I guess she was just trying to isolate me though, not protect me from possible death.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 09:22 PM
2

With all the people (feminists) saying "it's a biological inequality that women have the right to abort and men don't, so men should have to pay for the kid because it's their responsibility as a parent." Then when the biological inequality does not work in their favor, it's "since I'm punished for my biology, you must be too!"
/r/MensRights21/06/12 09:16 PM
1

Assuming they have a baby yes, it is possible for her to be unhappy after he leaves, like it is with any relationship where someone leaves and the other feels wronged. It's sounds like you are implying that all guys leave their girlfriend if they have a baby, that all guys in this sort of relationship are just trying to fuck her and run, or that two people can't be happy in this way. Is the girl mature enough to make that decision to be with that guy? Individual maturity, not everyone is the sam…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 09:00 PM
1

I believe people should live their life the way they want as long as it doesn't impede on other's human rights. If a girl or guy doesn't mind a huge age gap between them, and they are happy, it doesn't affect me, so why should I let it bother me or judge them?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:31 PM
1

So what's a woman to do when a guy she's not interested in makes an advance? What if she says no and he continues to pursue? And no again? Or doesn't text him back? Or doesn't try to contact him in any way? Harassment, you have every right to get your point across. It's this obvious? I'm not saying "as long as they are nice they can ask and do whatever they want and you should comply." I'm saying, to guys that try to socialize and immediately get called creeps is wrong, not the "I'm going to tal…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:18 PM
0

Having been in highschool, I knew plenty of girls that were pregnant by and/or dating 30+ year old men. You sound like it doesn't exist (age gap dating). Anyway, I never said "unattractive" is the only reason for creep shaming, like I said, that is the the unwarranted creep shaming that needs to stop, and the legitimate creep shaming to the rude, obscene, don't need to stop because those need to understand what they are doing isn't acceptable. I'm not arguing that all creep shaming is based on o…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:42 PM
0

So the solution is to shame them into never talking to women again just because they don't know how to approach a woman? Trust me I've met some creepy women, but I don't shut them down (shame/humiliate) like some women do. I should also mention the word cougar, since you mentioned guys going after younger girls. There are plenty of people perfectly fine dating older/younger people, they shouldn't shut themselves down before even trying just because someone may not like them or find an age gap cr…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 06:07 PM
0

I suggest you look at my other posts on here. I didn't pretend like anything first off. Unless you'd like to prove otherwise, you are just making assumptions based on the few posts I've made. So you are saying guys creep shame women. Seeing how I'm not a girl I don't have experience with being creep shamed as a woman, but it's not near the magnitude of guys being creep shamed. Guys are EXPECTED to go "find our girl" we can't sit around and expect girls to line up like some women can. Since guys …
/r/MensRights21/06/12 05:10 PM
1

Most of the time it is, of course it's on an individual basis, but sure the "aren't up to par" guys trying to socialize out weigh the amount of flat out terrible rude legitimate creepy people in the world.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 05:02 PM
20

There is a difference between finding someone creepy and expressing it to them. Creep shaming is like slut shaming as you are either publicly or to their face shaming them. It seems you misunderstand what creep shaming is. A guy asking you to marry him out of no where is creepy. A guy complimenting you, socializing with you, or just making small talk, is called creepy. This is wide spread too. A lot of women have a mentality that says "why is this creep talking to me?" where as they would usuall…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 04:31 AM
5

I agree people should be respectful to one another, the problem essentially with creep shaming isn't in doing it, it's that it's expanded beyond legitimate creeps, to just regular guys telling a girl they are beautiful or something polite like a regular compliment is misconstrued as "this guy is creepy, what gives this guy the right to talk to me?" We aren't talking about legitimate creeps that come up asking out of no where making obscene remarks/questions, we are talking about regular guys tha…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 03:43 AM
19

As a man, yes. I walked around on Halloween once as a trick or treat paper bag. So I wasn't wearing a shirt. Trust me, it's not a one way street. Squeaky wheel gets the grease? Just because someone gives you attention, does not mean they are a creep. In this case I guess I could go around slut shaming all the girls who we hitting on me asking about what I was wearing under the bag, just because I didn't find them attractive? No, I kindly turn them down for any advances I didn't want, instead of …
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:48 AM
56

Exactly, point being that: Guy - finds her attractive, and "hits" on her. Girl - Does not find man attractive and find his advance as a annoyance and disturbing. Even though, if the exact same action was performed by someone she found to be her "type" she would not complain or claim he was a creep. Thus creep shaming. It's sad that a man's attractiveness, or lack, in the eyes of an individual, defines a creep.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 01:02 AM
140

Sounds like creep shaming to me. If the guy was "her type" I'm sure she wouldn't be complaining.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 11:50 PM
1

A slap, like a punch, can be weak. I think you are missing that. Both being as strong as possible, a punch would only be marginally better due to a smaller impact radius. With that out of the way, if someone slaps you, it's not always a threatening "punch your teeth out, do damage" slap. Just like a punch isn't always that either. I've been punched before in the face without losing teeth (TBH never lost a tooth to violence), maybe only a slight bruise, which is common with slaps as well. No need…
/r/MensRights19/06/12 11:50 PM
1

Honestly, I don't think a slap is much less than a punch. Slaps can hurt, palms can hurt, I have done taekwondo for since being a child which has an emphasis on kicks and open handed punches (using your palm) which can be very harmful. I know most people view slaps as being petty, weak, and violent way to get your point across, but they can really hurt much like a punch. So escalation isn't the right word in my opinion. Going from a punch to a weapon is however escalation. You show that you plan…
/r/MensRights19/06/12 10:39 PM
1

Yes, if she gets a weapon out, you're even more screwed. Hence my comment that fist-in-her-face was terrible advice. You are looking at this wrong. If a guy punches a girl, guy goes to jail. Girl punches a guy, guy still at the least gets kicked out of his home (assuming they live together). Removing all the bad that a girl can possibly have at the end of physical violence and seeing female on male violence as acceptable doesn't solve anything. This is how it is, girl can hit guy, expect guy to …
/r/MensRights19/06/12 09:48 PM
3

I've been punched, plenty of times actually. I believe that's what physical violence entails. If someone punches me, I can resist, hold them down, or fight back. If it's a woman, my options are take it or run away. God forbid I make a mark on her defending myself while she is chasing me with a weapon. If someone threatens to punch you AFTER you already hit them once before. They have every right to tell you "Hey, I'm not going to just take this laying down like every other guy." Currently women …
/r/MensRights19/06/12 05:22 PM
1

Having moved to Iowa, I've noticed a significant lack of "woman up" statements. Having come from Virginia, where this was a frequent saying to counter "man up," I agree to starting with you here in Iowa.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 02:10 AM
1

Damn, I'm losing all my man cards except like one or two, how do I get them back guys!? D: lol Social engineering like this is great. /s
/r/MensRights19/06/12 01:50 AM
4

Exactly, the fact women have to be told "you attack me, and I can, and possibly will, do the same back" is because women tend to believe it is safe and acceptable to hit men if they want to. If women and men didn't have this mindset, I'm pretty sure neither would start something without knowing "this could end badly" currently women are mostly free of the "end badly" portion. Holding women/men to the same standard as men/women is not a bad thing.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 01:15 AM
5

Next time a woman's fist meets my face, I'll remember to get a weapon, thanks for the advice. /s
/r/MensRights19/06/12 01:05 AM
1

To add to your point, with any art (really any, movies, pictures, models, ect.) the artist will use what ever they feel fits their vision for their piece of art, and I don't think art should be censored, ratings and age restrictions are not what I mean by censors. I'm saying people telling others to change their art to fit their views/ideas of art. It's their creation not yours, if you don't like it, don't buy it.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 12:03 AM
1

I think you misunderstand my point. I quoted text saying men AND women have to deal with the risk of parenthood, which is completely not true. Women are only at risk of pregnancy with a choice of parenthood. Men are not given a choice. If you give men the choice to not be a father, much like women already have, they still don't have the choice to BE a father in the way a woman does. This biological inequality I believe is fair assuming women have to deal with the trouble of abortion and men the …
/r/MensRights06/06/12 08:54 PM
1

Sorry, wasn't entirely sure what you meant and just wanted to clarify. I totally agree though. :)
/r/MensRights06/06/12 07:18 PM
1

It needs to be recognized, though, that parenthood and its associated responsibilities is a risk that all men and women take when they choose to have sex-especially unprotected sex. Women have the opportunity to have an abortion, of course, but that also imposes a cost on them. Women run the risk of pregnancy, with the choice of bearing a child. Men run the risk of fathering the child with no choice. Abortion does impose a cost on women, which does not affect men. This however is a biological di…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 07:14 PM
1

Sorry, I'm guessing he didn't live in the same time period as jesus or something? Not sure, haven't looked into josephus or what ever, but if he lives in another time period where he could not have met jesus, then that definitely makes Josephus an unrealistic witness.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:13 PM
1

Well... I heard butterflies taste with their feet, so they are essentially licking you when they land on you. O_o EDIT: Some what relevant
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:05 PM
2

That is exactly what I'm saying. :) He may as well have been a non-fictional character in history, just that the stuff about him and his actions are another story.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 06:01 PM
5

Yeah, My link is talking about mustard... "next word in the Dictionary; Rape Butterfly" ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights06/06/12 04:06 AM
4

The way I understand the pay of teachers and some school bus drivers, they get their pay spread to cover the summer they don't work. Essentially getting paid for no hours worked during summer. It makes sense to add hours to make up for the 3 months they are getting paid but not actually working.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 03:59 AM
1

Not sure an eye witness from nearly 2000 years ago matters. The only way we would know if someone was an eye witness is if they wrote "I saw Jesus in the flesh!" nearly 2000 years ago, and even then it is one person that could be lying. There is no proving nor disproving him as a living being. Whether or not he was a son of GOD and what he supposedly did, can be arguably debunked.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 03:46 AM
1

They are psychologists, they study the human mind and motives for behavior. It is only a possible motive for rape, used to explain certain cases of rape. People want to know "why" for everything. Rationalizing horrible acts somehow make people feel they understand. Not sure anyone really knows what a rapist thinks, as I'm sure there is a lot of different reasons, motives, and social behavioral problems with their mind. EDIT: I should clarify that I'm talking about rape in the sense of someone go…
/r/MensRights06/06/12 03:34 AM
2

Google I'm guessing using: site:reddit.com/r/mensrights/ insert search word here
/r/MensRights06/06/12 03:23 AM
2

Not sure anyone can accurately answer your question. It not only would be a question better answered by a rapist, but is still, even then, one person's answer which is likely different from the next. All you can do is theorize and even then it's a very unlikely deterrent I'm sure. Not to mention possibly harmful and offensive to the victim to think of doing something like that under duress.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 03:17 AM
1

What they are talking about is "rape is used to give a feeling of power to the rapist" not that power, as in use of force, but as in making the victim feel as they are lesser/sub-human essentially.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 03:03 AM
1

It should have opt-in not opt-out IMO. Either way I don't like it. Altmehere already suggested this.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 12:10 AM
2

Pretty sure that people will sexually harass others regardless if it is a game, video chat, or social networking. It happens. Games are not a hostile environment for women, more often than not, just pretending to be a girl in a co-op game gets you free stuff (mainly MMO's). On average many guys are much more accepting of women playing games because they ARE a minority in a sport/hobby a lot of guys love. Point is, you'll get harassment where ever you go, gaming is no more or less hostile to any …
/r/MensRights05/06/12 10:54 PM
3

To be fair, it is rather strange that the idea of dragons began all around the world, at around the same time period, when most of those cultures had no contact with one another. Regardless, just because you don't believe in Christianity does not mean that the guy didn't exist, he could have just been a very passionate charismatic lunatic that people believed. Doesn't mean anything he did or about him, was real.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 09:15 PM
1

Any time someone mentions "bath salts" I remember the recent cannibalistic "zombie" attack in Florida.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 11:20 PM
0

Oh no no, i wasn't trying to disagree, I was trying to point out what I believe the argument was for making it "5+ months" I'm very familiar with the troubles women have when pregnant having had a kid with my GF/SO.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:48 PM
0

I think what was meant was because quite a few women could take advantage of it and just say they aren't showing yet. I mean there is no way to prove you wrong legally, so why not?
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:28 PM
1

ಠ_ಠ I think I'm tired of hearing about this book.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 04:35 PM
2

It's far from uncommon opinion of men, going from men are dogs, to how men have to be whipped, trained, ect. Glad that womenz know how to fix me so I can be a good boy. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights26/05/12 03:36 PM
10

I wonder if a male hired them in a divorce against his wife, whether they would legitimately help him.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 03:20 PM
1

Thanks, never heard of it that way.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 01:01 AM
1

My god... I just read through those comments below yours... it's absolutely disgusting...
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:41 AM
1

I wouldn't say you were an asshole for fighting back, and I definitely would not call you an asshole for wasting your own time. I don't know the full story, but I understand some of what you went through (abuse, child used as excuse, sticking around when you know you shouldn't) I just can't help but feel that you shouldn't put the blame entirely on yourself.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:28 AM
2

It took me twenty five horrible fucking years to realize I was an asshole. The one that did it to me.. In the first quote, don't you mean "I was with an" Not exactly sure how you were an asshole by staying or being abused...
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:11 AM
1

Prenup google what you can use in the prenup and what can't be used discuss prenup with possible marriageable candidate(s) ??? Profit
/r/MensRights24/05/12 11:38 PM
14

Reverse the genders, put it on another forum, it's not so weird for a lot of people strangely.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 11:28 PM
1

shit advice like 'don't stick your dick in crazy' Regardless how common this advice is given, it really is shitty advice since crazy has a good way of hiding and then showing up when money, court, kids, ect. get involved. Having lived the life of a loner with just guy friends and having lived the life of a popular go getter guy, my advice is have friends, live how you want, but try to avoid relationships, especially if they "grow" too fast. Getting around tends to have immediate gratification, b…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 10:53 PM
1

His choices are bad, but he acknowledges that and wants help and most of the people there either straight up attack him or downvote his comments to oblivion.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 09:58 PM
2

This particular lady's mindset: Hurt Father > WIN > Child's Well Being
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:15 PM
1

Well, to start off, I did not attack her, or bring her down, I pointed out she attributed her first conflict as angry, and every conflict she has ever had as angry. I stated maybe I did not understand, and I did not claim to know her life story. I merely said I thought it was ridiculous. If someone has the same posts on MR sure they have a problem that needs solving, I'll again point out that either they aren't looking at the big picture, that I don't fully understand, and that I find it ridicul…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:34 PM
1

Yes, and attributed them to all being some sort of angry act committed by man. To me, if you think every bad thing that happens is out of anger, you are either ignoring part of the problem, or you have a fear of men. Every girl I've dated has cheated on me, does that mean I'm a bad boyfriend somehow? Maybe. Is something wrong with all those girls I dated? Another possibility. Of course I could just go her way and say everything they did, from cheating, abuse, ect. and attribute it to all girls b…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:20 AM
3

If you read the description, they don't recognize the problem. They found something they think fits the bill for a scapegoat, Video Games and p0rn.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:27 AM
2

"Right of the CHILD!!! That child deserves someone's money!"
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:22 AM
0

Why fool with someone who doesn't have nothing? You have to love horrible grammar aka double negatives.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:03 AM
1

I wonder if reverse psychology works in this situation. Come out and state "I want to be banned from SRS." If they ban you, they are fulfilling their enemy's wish, if they don't then that person can bring reasonable arguments which they hate. It's kind of a lose-lose for SRS in that sense. :)
/r/MensRights24/05/12 12:49 AM
1

TL;DC?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 11:49 PM
2

Nicely put. A lot of people seem to associate long haired men are hippies, slackers, immature, gay, or many other things. They could be using these as excuses for their sexism, but either way it's discrimination based on that fact that we are men that just so happen to have long hair. Does it make us any different? Other than the fact we use a bit more shampoo and conditioner, no.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 11:35 PM
3

Yep, I guess I didn't really think about the random encounter statement. In the cases when it's from someone you hardly know, it is pretty demeaning. Thanks for bringing that to my attention! :D
/r/MensRights23/05/12 11:21 PM
3

"But you're too cute to be gay!" I've had it said before in reverse by some of my gay friends, I don't take offense to it because I saw it as flattery. I'm straight, but I have no problem admitting when a guy is attractive. However, I definitely understand what you mean by that. It does place a lower value on one's sexual orientation.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 11:06 PM
1

Yeah, it's a basic case of either ignorance, "I want to be accepted by the fempire," or flat out distaste for one's self which is sad.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 10:25 PM
1

I may just be a little more voiced about it because I have hair on the long side. It does not touch my shoulders but I know it holds me back as far as promotions and so on. I've been told that I have a promotion coming for me, I thought, "Sweet!" Sure enough, "I need you to cut your hair before you come in tomorrow." It's not like I'm not well groomed and clean. It's just flat out "you're a man, so start being a man."
/r/MensRights23/05/12 10:22 PM
1

Depends on the remark. I don't like that the pilot made a unilateral decision (at least the article makes it seem that way) but just imagine if a middle eastern guy was flying the plane and someone starts talking shit about how he is just going to crash the plane. Would you put up with that if you were the pilot?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 09:49 PM
3

┻━┻ ︵ ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) I know what you mean, you get 1000+ people agreeing with you praising you for dealing with it all, then one guy wants to give a male perspective and all shit breaks down. "You have a problem!? nah... can't be as bad, you're a guy, you can just use your man up powerz!"
/r/MensRights23/05/12 09:42 PM
1

Wow, takes a while to find where it all breaks down to "you are a guy, so you don't have to worry about our fear! So what happened to you, isn't really a big deal." A lot of this is very dismissive of when it happens to men. After reading the main link, read these comments
/r/MensRights23/05/12 09:17 PM
1

Yeah, I was about to direct you to your own comment on the other thread before I noticed it was you. lol I definitely agree with all your points here.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 08:55 PM
1

lots of angry women want privileges come asking for a new law. men with wives not wanting to invoke their wives wrath accept law. repeat and fast forward. Modern day near universal fear of men. I'm just guessing though, Factory may have a completely different meaning.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 08:52 PM
1

Lady has one bad experience at 12 yo, boy looks angry while saying, "you are just wearing that to make people look at your boobs." Somehow, now when ever anyone comments on her looks (sexual or not) it's angry and any response from others about what happened (ex. laughter) is angry. ಠ_ಠ Maybe I just don't understand, but that just sounds ridiculous to me and sounds like she has a fear of men more than anything.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 08:27 PM
6

It's understandable in environments for safety that you have your hair cut or held back. Just like working in food industry having a hair net. The rules are there for a reason, but the "cut your hair because you are a man" is not a safety rule, it is just SEXISM. It is a forced gender role only for men if you want to move past the $15 per hour jobs (there are a few exceptions where you can have long hair either due to company image or not being on the front lines for clients.) It's kind of ridic…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 08:07 PM
1

I did not get any upvotes so I wouldn't say they agree with me. Let's just say this is a bad debate topic and you are welcome to respond whenever. I would say you should actually reply to a topic relating to an MRA issue. Stuff like this, everyone has their own opinion and most view feminism as bad so try topics unrelated to feminism where there will be legit issue debate. EDIT: Missed a word.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:24 AM
1

To be Frank, I'm tired of this debate as it seems to be the same response from both of us over and over. Agree to disagree maybe? I'm of the opinion that demonizing a gender ,like feminism commonly does with campaigns like men can stop rape, and rape culture ect. isn't the right way to go about change. Bring your change and eventually it will have to be changed again. EDIT: Grammar.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 06:44 AM
1

Most people that had a dislike for him called him a pedophile, are pedophiles specifically gay? Did your teacher claim you were like micheal Jackson? If so what is their view of Micheal Jackson?. EDIT: I'm not trying to be rude, just think you are reading into things a bit too much. Yeah teachers DO pick favorites. It happens, can it be changed? No. Should you care that you are not their favorite student? No. Do they hate you or think bad of you? Now that we can't answer because I have not seen …
/r/MensRights23/05/12 06:41 AM
1

Wouldn't it be easier to just not give someone a raise if they don't deserve it or didn't ask? That's the way I see it. I understand and agree with some of the other comments on here to the effect that it may make ridiculous lawsuits or give pay raise to those that did nothing to earn the raise.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 03:35 AM
1

WTF??? Where are you getting your facts? This is fairly common, especially in religiously controlled households. This article specifically calls out households where emotional and physical abuse is common. There is not always help. I think you need to do a little more research on abuse. This article especially calls out abuse due to religious reasons, so that is relevant... Please enlighten me on where I would seek help if I were a 12 y.o. child in an Islamic family living in, say, Turkey. sigh …
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:57 AM
1

The vast majority of Christians do this. Most of the figures I've seen for people who identify as Christian and say they take The Bible literally are around 10%. Of the 10% that supposedly do, do they celebrate sabbath on Sunday? Little known fact that Saturday is the end of the week, thank you Catholics for making Sunday the end of the week instead of the beginning! Point is, religion gets changed, should you call it something new? Probably not, but is it still the same religion anymore? No. Yo…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:03 AM
2

Some people are much nicer/docile when drunk, maybe they assume volatile women like this become docile upon a certain BAC?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:46 AM
1

No. But I also don't live in a household where my mom or dad would beat me for not dressing right, talking right, acting right, etc... Yes, kids can think for themselves, but they can't always act on it. I don't remember my parents beating me for wearing black, skinny jeans, spiked hair, listening to metal, piercings, ect. I'm sure it is fairly uncommon to be in an abusive household where you get beaten, and abuse is not specific to religion. If you live in an abusive house, get help, there is h…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:35 AM
1

I think we can make an argument against this if we take a look at where people are born, who their parents are, etc... It is not ALWAYS a choice at every moment of your life, especially when you are not 18 yet. Do you do everything your parents say? Mom and Dad don't always know what is best or right. Not saying the kid would either. I happened to be brought up in Christianity, and have grown apart from it. Growing up and being taken to church does not mean you agree with the teaching, kids can …
/r/MensRights23/05/12 12:09 AM
1

Now take a long look at Christianity and what influence each gender had on deciding how they would portray gender roles to its followers. Religion is a choice. CHOICE. If you didn't want to accept that gender role, then don't follow that religion or in most cases don't go to that church, as not all churches have the same mentality. I'm sorry, but religion is for the most part dominated by males - especially the strictest religions. I personally do not believe in religion and also think that it i…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 10:57 PM
1

After all, I'm sure many people here have been hit on by a woman at least once and turned her down. Of course, but that doesn't tell us much. What is the ratio men turning down women vs. women turning down men? That is the real number. Another thing to think about is why they were being hit on. It could have been because they wanted to date said person or have sex with them. Depending on why they hit on the person is part of what determines why one would say yes or no. Someone may be interested …
/r/MensRights22/05/12 09:51 PM
1

It's the fact they are complaining they are single or can't get a date, not that they can't get sex, because they aren't asking for sex, or very rarely do. There is a difference between getting a date and getting sex. It's fairly hard for both male and female, ignoring looks, to get a date. However if men and women both came out asking for sex, women would have it easier just because there are more guys open to having just sex than there are girls open to it. This could be caused by society, bio…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 09:46 PM
8

Wow, this article is stupid... "Religious people don't want women playing baseball with men! Blame the MEN!" WTF, take a long look at Christianity and how it portrays gender roles to it's followers. This article is blaming men when this is just part of their religion. "They don't have to follow that!" yeah, maybe not, but would you still be christian if you just picked what pieces you liked and discarded the others? EDIT: My point is there are a lot of random things that gets changed about it, a…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 08:46 PM
6

I always thought the idea of not being able to tell other co-workers what you make ridiculous. Most of the reasons for having this is bullshit. If the person makes more because they have worked there longer or worked more hours to be worthy of a raise, then that's it. If someone can't understand why that person got a raise, then complain all you want until you are fired. Keeping it the way it is now though, allows people to legitimately be discriminated against. However, I have never seen a pay …
/r/MensRights22/05/12 08:33 PM
5

Have you mentioned this to anyone at work, your boss maybe? Things won't change if you don't try to open others' eyes.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 08:20 PM
-2

Upvote, because people are blind to sarcasm.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 08:09 PM
5

So you are telling every guy who was raped, "It didn't happen, that wasn't rape"? Isn't this victim blaming?
/r/MensRights22/05/12 07:44 PM
5

If I get asked questions from the "Dangerous" column, you should expect the same "Dangerous" responses, not that any of them are rude if asked correctly.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 12:50 AM
2

And... that is relevant? ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights22/05/12 12:32 AM
1

As a straight man, I am afraid my hair would catch fire. I believe OP is referring to some sort of gay stereotype their teacher may subscribe to.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 11:48 PM
1

"men face inequality here and here" "misogynist! Why do you hate women!" Gotta love how misogyny's new definition is: someone who disagrees with a feminist's opinion; women haters.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 03:51 AM
2

No problem, It's missed pretty frequently by people looking for info, so no worries. Good luck!
/r/MensRights20/05/12 03:44 AM
2

The most simple way is to look at the sidebar -----> They also have a list with sources on here: http://www.avoiceformen.com/mission-and-values/about/ If there is something specific you are looking for we can try and help find it.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 11:49 PM
1

Exactly, I wasn't trying to say opposing anything and everything funded by the government. I meant that if you disagree with the government on a particular action, in this case it's the funded action of mutilation, it is not anti-American.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 10:27 PM
1

Agreed. Opposing government funded actions however, is not anti-American.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 10:22 PM
1

Lack of coffee is my excuse... that work? lol
/r/MensRights19/05/12 10:08 PM
1

I was agreeing with you, just didn't state that very well. Kind of got myself in a loophole. "who says...?" answer then becomes "they say..." lol
/r/MensRights19/05/12 10:05 PM
1

a man of fine, honorable character. Character, Definition: Character. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights19/05/12 10:01 PM
2

Character and respect, these are traits that all PEOPLE should learn. Who says men alone should learn it to conform to some standard that "defines" a man?
/r/MensRights19/05/12 09:59 PM
1

I take conspiracy to apply to human actions, not natural phenomena. People conspire, nature doens't. Is all death natural phenomena or is someone purposefully doing something to make our lives limited? How does one differentiate a fact from mere theory? Technically whenever you can throw ridiculous logic at anything (like what I said above) it can be a theory. Yeah, maybe there is something else in the background causing feminism to be the problem and therefore being only theory. Still, as it st…
/r/MensRights19/05/12 09:20 PM
1

A conspiracy theory is merely an explanation for human events If you can call anything that has an explanation a conspiracy theory, might as well say that death is a conspiracy with many causes. ಠ_ಠ Your problem in definition is that it's not AN explanation, it's a POSSIBLE explanation, hence being theory. Feminism being part of men's problem is not a possible explanation, it is fact that it has caused problems for men. Specifically lobbying against bills that would give men equal rights. EDIT: …
/r/MensRights19/05/12 08:51 PM
1

MRM and WRM weren't built on a theory of victim vs oppressor ideologies. Feminism however was, hence the look, feel, and sound of a conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 08:38 PM
2

"There is no such thing as misandry, that's actually subtle misogyny."
/r/MensRights19/05/12 08:27 PM
2

I'm happy when Arnold Schwarzenegger is kinda relevant lol
/r/MensRights19/05/12 07:28 PM
2

Can't confirm the story, or the troll part, but this sort of stuff does happen. I don't think people aren't aware that girls can be bullies or violent, just that they think it's not a problem if it's towards a guy. That's my personal experience from when I was in school.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 07:20 PM
1

Obviously after having 21 kids, saying "i'm not going to father anymore children" means he's going to go from having 4 children each year to only 3 each year... ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:56 PM
2

Something wrong with that?! My TV was a good parent!
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:46 PM
7

According to what the story says, females are allowed to wear skirts and there was nothing stating that males could not wear skirts in the dress code. They are saying the skirt he wore was too short according to the dress code, the story also says girls wearing the same length skirt were not told they violated the dress code. Either because he was a male wearing a skirt, it brought attention to how short it was, or he was actually being discriminated against.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:43 PM
5

Yeah, I've heard the "if you aren't dead, you can keep working" thing before, I'm pretty sure that quickly slowed or stopped when those type of deaths became more apparent.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 06:32 PM
7

Most of the shame is similar to what you get in western countries, just more severe in some cases. Like being accused of sexual harassment (even after being found innocent) you'll be publicly ridiculed far worse and be almost unable to get a job in some cases. Stuff like not working hard is shamed (much like it is in other countries, but far worse) honor is another huge thing, some still believe in dying for their honor to prevent shame. It's hard to be specific as you can be shamed for a lot of…
/r/MensRights19/05/12 05:20 PM
1

She was trying to kill you out of love! Accept her love you misogynistic child!
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:46 PM
1

There is no such thing as moms that don't love their kids, it had to be out of love! /s
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:44 PM
1

First, this doesn't belong in r/MR (if it does please explain why) Second, the actual study is flawed at best. Watching TV while studying... really? No one does this to BE PRODUCTIVE. Productive multitasking isn't even covered in the study, things like answering the phone at work, taking information, writing and replying to emails, ect. doing any of them simultaneously, because if you don't, THE JOB IS NEXT TO IMPOSSIBLE, and far from being productive if you try to remember what they said on the…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:37 PM
1

The biggest problem is the default gynocentrism that has been programmed into us. Taking Feminist memes as a base stance instead of thinking from the ground up Agreed, couldn't really say it better. There's also no shortage of power hungry losers in here hopingto twist this movement to their own ends. Sadly with anything gaining power, there will always be those trying to change the end goal to fit their agenda. Thanks for the debate, I enjoyed it. :)
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:23 PM
2

Assuming she has a job, they both pay roughly half so that's 500 from him and 500 from her. 1,000 a month to raise a child, 12,000 a year, I've lived on 22k roughly supporting SO, baby, and me. It is definitely more than possible. If I had $500+ for just a child a month, that would be pretty significant. Seeing how it can be spent on anything though, that's another story. If you want a break down of costs monthly I will provide.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 05:19 AM
1

I won't deny MRM subreddit is kindergarten, it has a lot of readers and thus pulls a lot of new people constantly. Most probably get their start here. There are plenty that say that r/mensrights might even be close to being taken over by a feminist view. Honestly, I think it's just that plenty of people tired of feminism have moved from it to here and may have given it more of a feminist spin. Either way, I have strong opinions against feminism as a whole and honestly, until those with power sto…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:33 AM
1

Trust me I wasn't trying to say the way you do things is wrong. I was just pointing out that I think the movement needs both you, and a calmer stance from others, like me. I was saying that your stance does in fact bring change and followers, the negative press brought me to look into things here. The calm minds here helps dispel the negative press. I think both help. Some people tend to mistake your stance for trolling however since they feel offended when you just have a strong tone. Knowing t…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:19 AM
1

The first thing to ask, is when and how did you first find out about the MRM? Fairly recent as I'm 21, growing up with my parents I was rarely subjected to seeing inequality but of course as you come into the world and figure things out for yourself you begin to see what is really going on out there. As a kid it's easy to be told "that's just how things work" and believe for a good portion of your life that is how it should be. I've been reading here since I found reddit, but only recently made …
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:00 AM
1

I think you did pretty well for yourself in the argument/debate, their points were mostly trash and easily treated as such.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:53 PM
3

and if we just ask nicer, feminists will relent... The point being made is that, more often than not, feminists (and others not quite sure what to think of MR) will ignore or deny our arguments if worded this way. I'd rather inform 1 person in a debate with a calm tone, possibly changing their perspective, than get 2 people to agree and join while bringing more hate to our cause. Since we are known more as a hate group than a legit group with honest issues, having a calmer tone may benefit more …
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:46 PM
0

Of course the male's standard of living increases, he lost most of his stuff in the divorce so he will have to work more and gain more alone. The fact that women file for divorce more often and that males tend to have more to lose does mean they have the worse side of it. Statistically men's living increases for a lot of reasons.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:17 PM
1

That wasn't what i was trying to imply either. But the huge disparity in cost is due to the current gender bias. Once solved, funding can be solved which largely shouldn't be too much of an issue as long as It's not belittled as lesser than DV against a female, which it is in some cases which may lead to lower funding as it could be seen as "not as important."
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:50 AM
2

I was only making the point about commitment. There are plenty of guys willing to commit to a relationship, but it gets a lot harder for a guy to seriously commit to marriage. On the point of one night stand type things, this is solely something that comes with dating. Sadly you can't just walk up to women and say you just want sex. There are the exceptions when women are open to the idea but most find it creepy. Guys have similar issues with getting interested in a girl and finding out she is j…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:38 AM
1

Most DV doesn't require fleeing from your partner and utilising a shelter, though. Doesn't mean men should be without an option like is given to women, and money doesn't solely go to shelters, It's just one part of an argument. I wasn't intending to, just making a point that women getting more isn't necessarily supremacism (if they need more). VAWA ignores men in this situation. Nothing was stopping them from making it gender neutral. Women don't specifically NEED it more, as there is no way of …
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:14 AM
1

Being that DV/DA is roughly equal between genders, I'd say males should be given the same attention as it can harm both male and females equally. Because of the fact there is nearly no, if any, funding currently, men can't be currently helped the same way. Claiming women get the funding because they use it is pointless as men currently can't use or get nearly any of the same help to be part of the statistics.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:49 AM
-1

syndrome FTFY, joke is in bad taste however imo.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 02:20 AM
4

This comic made my day. :)
/r/MensRights16/05/12 01:29 AM
10

In my opinion, getting a man to commit (to a relationship or engagement or marriage, depending on where the couple is) is FAR more tricky and has a way higher risk of heart-crushing outcomes. Women file divorce more often than men, would you expect men to be more willing to commitment when they are more likely to be left in a divorce? Men are more likely to commit suicide after a divorce than women as well, which could be due to men having more to lose on average in a divorce. Society makes it p…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 12:53 AM
1

Elderly and disabled are exempt from being drafted. If a female has children or is pregnant then she could also be exempt, like wise a father could stay home with the children if the mother was drafted but the father wasn't. Both being drafted would probably end up being a choice of who is better fit to stay with the children. IMO this is how it could work.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 11:53 PM
1

when men are just as in need of that money Are they? YES they are! I currently live in a state with no family or friends with my SO. If she were abusing me I would literally have no place to go because VAWA ignores men's needs and there is barely, if any, resources put into men shelters for DV/DA. Not to mention primary aggressor laws(?) that makes this all the less likely that I can/would be able to get help from anyone but family more than 1,000 miles away.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 09:31 PM
2

Does Egalitarian not work for you? If not, then for what reasons? Just curious. Just read a response to someone else regarding this. Thank you.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 08:51 PM
1

Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), the vice chairwoman of the House Republican Caucus, said Monday that the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) shouldn't include protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people because "those are side issues." Really? People are side issues if you don't agree with them? WTF...
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:04 PM
1

Could have a better title, but none the less was a good read IMO.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:45 PM
1

I have an older brother and younger sister. They were both treated rather equally, I guess me being the middle child meant that I wasn't allowed to be alone with a girl, however my brother and sister were allowed to have their SO spend the night. ಠ_ಠ It doesn't end there but it's not really a fun story. lol
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:40 PM
1

My point was that being under the influence, drugs, hormones, alcohol, ect. should not allow a person to blame it on drugs, hormones, alcohol, ect. or the other party. If a guy went and attacked someone and said "too much testosterone, not my fault" or "I was drunk, wasn't my fault."
/r/MensRights15/05/12 01:52 AM
2

When they mention that it's in response to the "don't get raped" lessons being taught, there is a difference. EVERYONE at anytime can be a victim, however their response labels every man a rapist. There could have been a much easier, more acceptable way to make these gender neutral and actually relate more to what they supposedly intended without labeling everyone a rapist.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 12:46 AM
8

Beatingwomen is their origin SubReddit. Very telling, may be another Viperz account.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 11:11 PM
7

What I don't like about this is it enables one to run out after possibly consenting to having a child with the mother. Say everything is fine, both want the child, months go by, random fight ensues. Father no longer wants anything to do with the child or mother, however the mother is left with a body changing birth since it is past the window for abortion. Mother has to give up the child or raise a child on her own when she expected a father as well. I'm for LPS but it needs to be in cases where…
/r/MensRights14/05/12 11:04 PM
1

Nothing to be honest. Unless there is a solid reason the child should not be with the mother. Seeing how I'm threatened with child support if I so much as want to do something my SO doesn't want, like see my family in another state, I think I have looked enough over the issue to know that it can be abused without any recourse. Unless there is reason the child should not be with the mother, like the mother not having a home, car, job, abuse, drugs, ect. If the mother is at all vindictive, the fat…
/r/MensRights14/05/12 09:30 PM
0

Sorry to ignore the question, I noticed this was a picture relating to a pregnant woman and diablo 3. Made me sad because my SO made me return D3 yesterday after I bought it. :( As far as the question, I think all the images depicting all men as cheaters/players is probably the thing that irritates me most. That however is probably because my history with unfaithful/loyal women, but I don't attribute that to ALL women being cheaters as is done to men pretty frequently.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 08:48 PM
1

I think it may have been how you sounded like you were trying to justify men having to show more restraint, when both genders should restrain themselves equally. Not sure however. I didn't down vote so I honestly don't know the actual reason.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 07:11 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/tm1sj/my_wife_is_being_charged_with_assault_and_i_have/c4nsxr9 Comment a few hours ago. Even with hormonal changes though it doesn't warrant destructive behavior.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 06:48 PM
1

The majority here believe "people should not hit people unless, hit first, to defend another, or is consensual." Gender shouldn't be brought in. If a person wants to hit you and does, gender be damned you have every right to hit them back!
/r/MensRights14/05/12 06:23 PM
1

Post history shows troll or someone who is actually sick.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 09:49 PM
1

Sorry, skipped that picture up top lol I was automatically thinking the lolita dressed girl.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 09:39 PM
48

Anyone think we should add subreddits to the sidebar that we do NOT affiliate with? It wouldn't stop the linking from them to r/MR, but it will be a good reference point IMO.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 10:48 PM
0

I find the young woman on the cover attractive. Just a heads up, she is over 18. If they had gotten a younger girl (15) in a lolita/victorian dress to model I could only imagine people freaking out over it, even though it's not sexual.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 10:20 PM
1

^ was a relevant comment, nothing wrong, extreme, or otherwise... why the down votes? If people are down voting the rightsbot as well, there must be a few people here just trolling with down votes. -_-
/r/MensRights12/05/12 09:12 PM
2

Rinse it out in the sink since you are near a toilet, then trash it. Simple.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 09:07 PM
1

As if I didn't already hate the original song.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 05:50 PM
2

Ok, I'm making a similar sign, crossing the gendered words out and putting gender neutral words in their place. If I get any interesting responses I will update with a post/link/pic.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 03:43 PM
11

Neither does your comment...?
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:39 AM
1

Personally, I'm not against the idea of paying for BC, condoms, ect. However, I'm not against getting them for free either. I've been to planned parenthood once before for an ultrasound when my SO found out she was pregnant, just never realized what all they offer.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:36 AM
1

Hmmm... interesting proposition... can't argue with free...
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:24 AM
3

Is the problem the title of the movie? The title is definitely eye catching and conversation inducing which is probably why they chose it. The movie for those who haven't read the article yet is about informing that sex between a 15-17 year old and an adult 18+ is not pedophilia. Of course interest in 15-17 year olds is not a male only interest.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 02:21 AM
14

Any chance I could buy this shirt from somewhere? If not I'll make my own. Legit shirt, it prompts informative conversation.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:47 AM
2

From the way I understand things, they aren't trying to take abortion or BC away, they want the government to stop paying for it. I haven't really checked, but I don't think I can go somewhere and get free condoms paid for via the government, but I could be wrong.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:29 AM
1

The charges, bail, and prison sentence all look very reasonable. It doesn't look like a case where she is being let off easy. Not sure why this was posted.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 11:23 PM
4

True, I think if the boy was running and the girl was chasing him with a bat, society might find it funny, but gender reversed, would be horrible. Then again I've just heard one too many stories of "concerned mothers" yelling at boys for being "abusive" toward girls.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 11:09 PM
9

Teacher of the year! A+
/r/MensRights10/05/12 09:09 PM
2

She shaved half my beard in the divorce... Luckily it will grow back as resilient as ever.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 08:57 PM
2

I'm willing to donate my beard to those affected by "Face Coldness." Life was harsh as a kid without a beard, so I understand.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 08:47 PM
1

This one article doesn't speak for all Jewish people, I understand that their religion, as well as Christianity, Catholic, ect. helped push MGM as acceptable. I just don't see how a Jewish article complaining about a particular problem plaguing men, relates to MGM alone. I'm not saying to support them. Sorry if I sounded like I was trying to justify MGM on their behalf, it's a terrible problem.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:51 PM
1

Okay? So, someone saying that a group/race/gender/ect. has no right to complain about what they see as a problem, isn't like someone saying that a group/race/gender/ect. has no right to complain about what they see as a problem? That makes plenty of sense. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights10/05/12 06:02 AM
5

I feel this way sometimes as well, since anything that might be against a feminist view is widely accepted as misogyny, evil, wrong, against "equality", ect.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:16 AM
1

That is like feminists saying "Women have been, and still are oppressed, therefore you can't complain about your 'man' problems." Seriously though, not all Jewish people go through circumcision and many don't follow the religion and just classify themselves as Jewish.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 01:05 AM
2

Get rejected multiple times, flake on a date, ignore a call, lose interest because she's not "sexual" enough, etc. This is experienced on both sides as it is something that comes with dating. Who chases who, I agree more women need to be willing to make a move, but in my experience I've already had quite a few who did.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 12:29 AM
2

Had this happen too, except I was dating the girl, we were not drunk and she claimed I raped her because she was being called a slut for sleeping with me. Could not see the logic in the name calling or the rape accusation.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 09:15 PM
10

Female cries at work, suspend worker who caused her crying or try to help alleviate the problem. Male cries at work, you are too emotional and may cause problems with other workers here. This is just how I observed things when I worked in a warehouse 4 years ago.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:55 PM
1

Broad, vague, definition of rape to allow easier false accusation toward some men who need to be made into a lesson. Glad some innocent men could help by being behind bars... /s
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:33 PM
3

I tend to be overly cautious when I read titles like that and is linked to a video. Thank you.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 12:23 AM
1

Glad to be made a lesson of? lol Either way, I don't regret for one second becoming a father. Sadly just wish his mother was a better person overall...
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:58 PM
5

Video... Yeah, too freaked to click a link labeled like that... Someone who is a bit more brave want to save the day? On a side note, if the title is true... that is beyond fucked up...
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:54 PM
2

It's not fine that she doesn't have a job. Trust me, I know. She's a destructive person, but being under threat of child support if I leave doesn't help things. Right now it's not in my best interest to leave because it would hurt me and my child more than it would her. Especially since I would be broke the second she files for child support.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:04 PM
2

No, you aren't the only one. I would personally love to be a SAHD, love my kid and have an easier time raising him than my SO. Sadly she doesn't have any intention of letting that happen, which for now is fine as I have a higher earning potential. She's never had a real job to be honest.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 06:23 PM
3

I find it ridiculous to have to cut my hair or shave to meet a specific criteria to be acceptable for work. I understand being well groomed, but this is different. If a guy's hair is a tad on the long side, you're automatically unprofessional. Sorry if I was missing the point.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 09:36 PM
2

Hold on while I rinse my eyes out...
/r/MensRights05/05/12 09:25 PM
1

Math related username... mathematical error... :) Using formulas containing cosine, simple. Numbers involving commas... not so simple. Just messing with you by the way.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 09:04 PM
1

That would be assuming the majority of fathers are scumbags, to which I disagree.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 08:52 PM
1

I wouldn't go so far as to say women tend to be more sensitive, guys are taught to "man up" and seem to be affected less because most hide their feelings.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 08:45 PM
0

If a guy knew of all the current issues with marriage, and still got married, I'd say he is pretty stupid... You don't need a piece or paper and a ring to show that you love someone. My only problem with this is the pregnancy one, which may be just me reading into things too much. I feel it assumes the girl must be dumb to get pregnant and the guy must be smart to leave. (as he is not there in the picture)
/r/MensRights05/05/12 07:09 PM
2

I was thinking the same thing, I haven't posted my story, but I'd rather be in another country and be unable to see my kid than in jail and be unable to see my kid. Either way I can never get custody back after becoming a "deadbeat dad" since I could not afford CS. No matter how I look at it the fear of never seeing my child again is there.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 01:48 AM
1

If facebook is proof of anything, people happen to say it all the time as if the word is not racist. Used constantly in place of bro, dude, man, ect.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:49 PM
2

My sister when I was young would do this on a regular basis to get her way. Example: Laying on the floor screaming "Mom" while crying. Too many parents show their girls that it's acceptable to do wrong and it's not punishable (or less punishable) due to their gender. Even in cases when ridiculous claims are made, my parents (or friend's parents) would say, "I know it's a lie, but apologize, you must have done something." I think it is partially due to parents believing boys by default, are more …
/r/MensRights03/05/12 11:36 PM
1

Thanks, I didn't exactly feel offended by it. However it was just a surprise that with numbers that close they wouldn't ask a woman's opinion on why they might cheat. I think I was just curious for an answer from both sides of the study.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 01:45 AM
2

I thought it was interesting that they said 70% of men cheat, 60% of women cheat, but only asked "why do men cheat?" Thoughts?
/r/MensRights03/05/12 01:34 AM
3

I hear this all the time (forced breadwinner) at work. -_- Most of the people at work are women and most of those working here are of the mindset that guys need to work to provide a home for girls to live in... That's fine if that's what both individuals in the relationship want, but it is NOT universal nor should it be.
/r/MensRights03/05/12 12:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter