TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

omegaflux Archive

View 45 posts and 368 comments by omegaflux on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
256

omegaflux/r/MensRights17/06/11 02:52 PM
227

omegaflux/r/MensRights07/02/12 02:49 PM
146

omegaflux/r/MensRights28/10/11 10:12 PM
112

omegaflux/r/MensRights19/01/12 04:56 AM
110

omegaflux/r/MensRights09/11/12 09:18 PM
102

omegaflux/r/MensRights14/09/11 02:12 PM
58

omegaflux/r/MensRights17/02/12 12:15 AM
41

omegaflux/r/MensRights18/09/11 10:50 PM
38

omegaflux/r/MensRights12/08/11 02:08 PM
36

omegaflux/r/MensRights08/09/11 01:07 AM
35

omegaflux/r/MensRights26/09/11 06:46 PM
34

omegaflux/r/MensRights25/06/12 07:57 PM
33

omegaflux/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:25 PM
33

omegaflux/r/MensRights21/08/11 11:09 PM
29

omegaflux/r/MensRights31/08/11 12:21 AM
25

omegaflux/r/MensRights29/10/11 08:25 PM
24

omegaflux/r/MensRights19/06/11 07:06 PM
18

omegaflux/r/MensRights11/12/11 01:17 AM
18

omegaflux/r/MensRights21/01/12 07:14 PM
18

omegaflux/r/MensRights04/02/12 07:30 PM
15

omegaflux/r/MensRights11/07/11 03:08 AM
13

omegaflux/r/MensRights02/07/11 02:50 PM
13

omegaflux/r/MensRights20/01/12 06:27 PM
12

omegaflux/r/MensRights22/07/11 09:40 PM
10

omegaflux/r/MensRights28/09/11 06:04 PM
9

omegaflux/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:02 PM
9

omegaflux/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:01 PM
8

omegaflux/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:47 PM
8

omegaflux/r/MensRights17/10/11 02:37 AM
8

omegaflux/r/MensRights13/08/11 08:55 PM
7

omegaflux/r/MensRights22/10/11 09:49 PM
7

omegaflux/r/MensRights12/08/11 05:08 PM
5

omegaflux/r/MensRights08/01/12 07:57 PM
5

omegaflux/r/MensRights30/09/11 03:44 PM
4

omegaflux/r/MensRights14/08/11 09:19 PM
4

omegaflux/r/MensRights28/01/12 04:43 PM
3

omegaflux/r/MensRights06/07/11 06:39 PM
2

omegaflux/r/MensRights07/10/11 10:25 PM
2

omegaflux/r/MensRights12/06/11 07:43 PM
2

omegaflux/r/MensRights15/07/11 11:54 PM
1

omegaflux/r/MensRights26/07/11 11:50 PM
0

omegaflux/r/MensRights01/02/12 07:37 PM
0

omegaflux/r/MensRights19/12/11 12:28 AM
0

omegaflux/r/MensRights24/08/11 03:50 PM
0

omegaflux/r/MensRights11/01/12 12:51 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You came to rally a personal army cuz you're sad little bitch who can't stand up for himself. And talk about the pot calling the kettle black, someone who constantly posts anime porn acting like it's other people suffering from mental illness, you're so pathetic you have to turn to fictional characters since no real person would have the slightest interest in you. This post has nothing to do with men's rights, it's just your pathetic attempt to rally a personal army to defend yourself being too …
/r/MensRights11/07/17 04:28 AM
0

Get out if here with this bullshit fake title. You're trying to rally a personal army to save you from losing an argument on r/libertarian, where you fake like you belong despite being a big government social conservative, by coming here where you fake like you're an MRA arguing elsewhere against imaginary "SJWs," on that sub of all places. You're just a sad authoritarian who didn't like getting downvoted for having shit arguments, like is rightfully happening here again.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 05:33 PM
0

For the sake of humanity, please don't procreate, better you shoot yourself than any imaginary future kids. What a vapid and illogical argument, which is your modus operandi and considered high brow among your ilk over at the_donald, though it's a shame visitors to this sub have to be subjected to your childishness. You should have spent more time in university developing your mind rather than being the sad little cuck that you were, and still are really. I want to empathize with you wondering w…
/r/MensRights12/04/17 03:53 AM
5

If we're going to complain about the other side distorting things we shouldn't permit it here. Per your second citation around 1.5% of murders were preceded by rape or another sex offense, which is far different than 1.5% of rapes end in murder as you claimed. You started with a faulty premise, followed with a faulty analysis, which invariably led to a faulty conclusion.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 05:47 AM
2

Coke has been fine with featuring female on male violence in its adverts: approximately 20 seconds in....
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:18 PM
3

(1) unique to, significantly more serious for, or significantly more prevalent in women; and ‘‘(2) for which the factors of medical risk or type of medical intervention are different for women, or for which there is reasonable evidence that indicates that such factors or types may be different for women. This is the part you have to argue against and in doing so this single anecdote will do nothing to help. They will specifically argue the factors are different.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 01:45 AM
1

Yeah, as someone in the field of public health this simply isn't true. You even quoted the relevant policy section which shows this to not be true (3509 c 1). This whole message is embarrassing. Here guys, send a message to the heads of an executive department and one of its agencies about a factually inaccurate internet posting and tell them how they're in violation of the law despite quoting the very section in your message which shows they aren't. This is not a good way to go about activism.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:19 PM
3

I know it was a quote, I read the whole BS story. These clinics are under no obligation to screen a walk in and it wasn't even the appropriate venue given his condition. This action opportunity is as ridiculous as the original post. This man is not dead because of the CDC or WISEWOMAN.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 06:46 AM
1

There are no clinics run by the CDC.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 06:12 AM
5

Nice to see a level headed comment in here, but the professor never made those statements. OP's link quotes a satirical site.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 06:09 AM
9

No he didn't. OP's link quotes the Diversity Chronicles which is a satire site. This whole story is made up. Some right wing website basically just quoted the equivalent of an Onion article. For a community supposedly into fact checking this thread is fucking ridiculous. 29 comments and not a single one recognized that this whole thing is BS. I guess some of the posters had more important things to worry about than the story's veracity, like the Jooos. robert32907[S] 0 points 1 hour ago Because …
/r/MensRights26/11/13 06:06 AM
2

There are no documented cases of female military members in this situation. I'm confused, if there are guidelines requiring benefits go to a person's spouse then how would no female military members be affected, or do the guidelines specifically say benefits only go to wives and not husbands?
/r/MensRights03/11/13 10:12 PM
6

You should repost this to r/OneY for added visibility.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 09:39 PM
6

Though I'm not Canadian, I'm sure the law is the same there. There was talk in the NASCAR sub that she should be banned by the organization from races, which I think would be a great idea.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:27 AM
53

He shouldn't have to. Despite common misconceptions, it's the state's job to bring about charges, though an individual can bring a crime to the attention of the state if they are unaware of it. This woman committed a crime and the state has a duty to charge her. Maxes wishes really don't even come into play. When we hear about charges being dropped by an individual what is really happening is that the person has expressed they will not cooperate and the state drops the charges believing it impos…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:05 PM
12

I know what you mean; it's difficult to tell what they're getting at. They put quotes around "sexualised," likely because that was the exact word the psychologist used but it also leads one to question if that is just a nicer way, if there is such a thing, of saying he was sexually abused. They way they describe things are somewhat vague and ambiguous: "a woman...who "projects her...sexual fantasies onto him [Breivik]." It will be interesting to read the excerpts from the psychologists in the bo…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 11:19 PM
0

You would have to have a basic understanding of sociological principles to understand what the site is saying. The fact that you even said feminized in your post shows you have a long way to go in this debate. That site isn't my site, it's a site using data from Geert Hofstede's research. You're clearly much more knowledgeable than the man, I'm sure. I'm sure you boast a list of awards and honors more impeccable than the following and that you could teach the man a few things about gender and cu…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 12:08 PM
0

Oh you managed to say 'Israel apologist' in your post (you get extra edgy points for that). I never said this wasn't an issue in Israel (nice strawman), I said your characterization of a country based on your posting unoriginal source material to a subreddit and cursory understanding based on a few articles you've read was laughable. I have personally posted original source material about the issue to r/Israel and it wasn't downvoted. You said: I think their culture is probably the most Feminize…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 11:24 AM
0

Am I trolling? You're the one crying about downvotes on one article it isn't even clear you posted and using that to make generalizations about a country I assume you've never been to (since if you had you'd know your statement was complete rubbish).
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:53 AM
0

I cross posted this stuff in /r/Israel and it was downvoted to hell. I don't see the crosspost in your submitted history. You're also using the upvote/downvote ration after not even an hour (judging by when you posted this comment) as proof of something. Submissions about fathers' rights in Israel have been upvoted and dsicussed there in the past, but it's always preferable to post links to original sources. I think their culture is probably the most Feminized on Earth. LOL. Spoken like someone …
/r/MensRights14/10/12 10:35 AM
1

Just came to post this and am glad to see it's already here. It's a pretty good critique, and I look forward to seeing some more in-depth ones in the coming weeks.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:42 AM
1

Oxford English Dictionaries definitions on antisemitism: noun [mass noun] hostility to or prejudice against Jews. anti-Semitism NOUN hatred of Jews; unfair treatment of Jews The fact that the word Semitic existed for longer (not much longer, less than a century during which time it was only used in certain academic circles and certainly not by the masses) means nothing since the average person had no idea what Semitic meant and since Semites are far from a monolithic group the words Semite/Semit…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 01:43 PM
2

I've seen it for all types of stuff. If there's one sure way to make sure a social movement can never fade it's by co-opting every issue under the sun.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 03:13 AM
1

I am committing a question. I know you're asking a question and that's what I'm addressing, though you're whole point was fallacious. Why use anti-semitic, which is not clearly defined for all people hearing it, and never ever ever use anti-Jewish? The vast majority of the Western world is familiar with the word, and especially in academic circles where it matters most. Just because someone doesn't understand a word's meaning doesn't mean the word is inappropriate. Why is it taboo and against al…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 02:41 AM
1

What you're doing is committing an etymological fallacy. The word antisemitism was not created by Jews but by a person who hated Jews and wanted to give his, and his ilk's, hatred a scientific air. Even the Wiki page touches on this: While the term's etymology might suggest that antisemitism is directed against all Semitic peoples, the term was coined in the late 19th century in Germany as a more scientific-sounding term for Judenhass ("Jew-hatred"),[2] and that has been its normal use since the…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 01:57 AM
0

So, once again, when you said "any objection" you were lying, right, because you've failed to show otherwise and are now trying to change the subject. If you can't use language which doesn't dredge up connections to past events where none exist then perhaps it's time to rethink what you're arguing. Otherwise to use such language is simply done to be purposefully inflammatory and is intellectually dishonest. There are many different types of oppression and you can't just label something as Nazism…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 09:32 PM
1

It could be said to go either way depending on how you look at it. On the one side you could say they are excluded from the debate in the US because no one cares what they think and they and their practices are considered barbaric or not civilized. You could look at it as though no one wants to offend them. You could look at is as the people disproportionately focusing on Jewish circumcision also have something against Jews (and if you looked at some of the Foreskin Man comics there is good reas…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:57 PM
3

No, in the Western world mutilation of girls is considered barbaric while mutilation of boys (in the US and to a lesser extent in other Western nations) is considered acceptable, regardless of the religion (or lack of religion) doing it. In Europe where much of the circumcision debate has taken place Muslims have most certainly been a part of the debate. Offending Muslims is just as if not more taboo in many European countries than offending Jews. Edit: And to say they "also practice" minimizes …
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:48 PM
0

You said any objection, meaning all objections, and your proof of that is that a college student told someone something was offensive. The word antisemitism was never used in the video you linked to, the student simply told Finklestein the analogy was insensitive, like referring to a black manager who is strict as a slave driver.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:44 PM
10

I just think the MRM should focus on men's issues and not coop every single political issue like feminism did. For instance, the first google hit: Why the Question of Palestine is a Feminist Concern You could literally search for any political keyword and find a similar result, about how it relates to feminism. Of course feminists being leftists ignore things like the fact that women who have children outside of wedlock are imprisoned for years in Gaza in favor of bashing Israel where there is m…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:40 PM
4

If you haven't seen any in the threads about circumcision then you're blind. There have been threads purposely mistitled to say a Jew said something about circumcision when the author was in fact Muslim. The sheer fact that Judaism is the religion most often brought up when speaking about circumcision despite the fact that Muslims circumcise far more boys and in a more violent manner meets one of the criteria for a valid charge of antisemitism (disproportionate attention).
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:22 PM
3

And will make the MRM lose allies. The comparison is not apt since the whole "anyone who disagrees with any of Israel's policies is an antisemite" is a strawman argument made by /r/worldnews posters.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:19 PM
5

Zionism≠Judaism
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:18 PM
-1

Any objection to this injustice is deemed antisemitism... No it's not, and to assert otherwise is absurd. People constantly make this claim in /r/worldnews without any backing. It seems to exist more in the minds of redditors that in the real world.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:17 PM
6

The Innocence Project is a great organization. I had the honor of interviewing the president of my state's chapter for a criminal justice course. You can check out their site to see what the people they've freed were charged with and the most common charge is rape. From what the president told me they're only able to scratch the surface of people wrongly imprisoned due to a lack of funding, and judicial blocking, so I'm sure any donations would be appreciated.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:39 PM
19

According to the disciplinary summaries issued by the Teacher Regulation Branch, middle school teacher John Lindsay Davidson’s problems began in March 2011 when he hooked his laptop up to a projector for a lesson. A student noticed a link on-screen marked "schoolgirl porn." An RCMP investigation found a total of 14 such links on his computer with titles that included references such as "teacher" and "coach." All the porn involved featured adults, but Davidson agreed to be stripped of his right t…
/r/MensRights23/07/12 05:16 AM
1

While Jews do claim that campaigns to end circumcision are anti-Semitic, the inordinate focus on Jews, I believe, is a sign of subtle antisemitism. The vast majority of circumcisions in the US are nonreligious and nontherapeutic. That should be where the main focus is. The majority of religious circumcisions in the U.S. and worldwide are done by Muslims, and the method is more damaging since it is often done after infancy up until age 10 (generally). I have never seen, except for a poster who ma…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 05:15 PM
1

Read the article and the comments. I always read the comments under articles since they reflect (in as best of way as possible for something on the internet) what's in the minds of the people. You're really desperate about this, following me around to argue. Why not go out and actually do some real work against MGM?
/r/MensRights18/07/12 03:17 AM
0

What's your point? The quote doesn't show what you think it does. It's hateful to lie about someone's religion, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, etc. If someone had posted "Woman human rights lawyer..." and it was actually a man who said it, would everyone be arguing that it doesn't matter that it wasn't really a woman since somewhere there's a woman who believes the same thing. That would be equally absurd. Edit: In any event, this is silly. As a public health student actively involved in an…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 03:15 AM
-1

Did you get tired of my going through my comment history so you could respond to me in different threads? I understand what a lie is. It's funny how you're trying to argue the semantics of lying. The title refers specifically to a Jewish civil rights lawyer, a person and not a group of people (Jews), when the man is in fact a Muslim "human rights lawyer." This is a lie, and a blatant one, no matter how you splice it. My main point about the attention I've received is that why did this article ha…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 03:12 AM
1

Well hello there stalker. You seem really bothered by the fact that someone pointed out that a poster was lying and the community accepting of it. You're even going through my posting history to follow me around to make a point. What does it say about a community where a link gets 20 upvotes without someone pointing out the title is a lie? Does it say that the community doesn't care about lying or that no one actually read the article. Either way you all look like fools.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 03:02 AM
-2

I've put nothing aside, unless you think posting "Aw yeah man, fuck those people" on an internet forum actually does a lick of good. I'm an actual advocate against MGM who speaks with members of the religious community, so I could care less about Reddit's internet warriors. I've gotten into it before with members of this sub over the counterproductive methods used. Thanks once again for proving my point. Can a movement really be asked to be taken seriously when more hostility is directed to some…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:58 AM
-2

Irrelevant. This is about what standards the MR community wants for itself. If the consensus is that it's okay to blatantly lie about an article's content then everyone should just admit that so others know that the content here should not be trusted, or at least taken with a grain of salt. It's funny how one of the big topics in the MRM is misrepresentation by feminists, yet when misrepresentation is pointed out here it is the person pointing it out who receives the attention and not the person…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:42 AM
-1

Nothing from you, just in general that when someone lies in the title of a thread they be called out on it, and that someone calling a lie out not receive more attention than the person who actually lied.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:29 AM
-2

Upvote that, shitstain Ahh, another poster who is a shining example of civility. You really wonder why people have trouble taking this subreddit seriously when there is so much hostility? If you were trying to disprove my point it would have helped had the post not been made simply in response to my comment.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:23 AM
-6

Don't care about the downvotes, just pointing out where people's priorities are. Nice gendered slur there; there's definitely no hatred in this thread. I stated a fact, as this thread and others show evidence of hatred and lies. Does stating facts in this subreddit make one a "cunt." I find that odd with how much complaining is done about feminist misrepresentations. The lie part is obvious, the title of this thread being the lie. The hatred is more subtle and evidenced in the fact that the enti…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 12:26 AM
1

If we're talking about why a vote wasn't allowed to proceed it's because state law prohibits it, full stop. If I submitted a ballot initiative in my city for the legalization of all drugs there would likely be plenty of groups fighting it, though none of that would matter since as a matter of law a locality cannot pass a law to override a state law. I unsubscribed from this subreddit after witnessing multiple instances of both explicit and subtle antisemitism, though subtle more often than not. …
/r/MensRights17/07/12 11:47 PM
-1

I don't think most people here read the article. The article was written by a Muslim man, it says so in the editor's note before the article even begins in earnest, yet the OP claims him to be Jewish in the thread's title. Also the way your comment was downvoted shows that the people voting this thread up are doing so based on the title alone, without having read anything.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 11:34 PM
-4

Quit deflecting. I'm making an explicit statement, not an implication, that the title of this post is a fabrication, yet it continues to be upvoted while the person who points out that it is a blatant lie is being downvoted. Once again the members of this forum show themselves to be as petty and full of BS as those they criticize.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 11:30 PM
-7

Nice to see more hatred and lies coming come from r/MensRights. 18 upvotes and not a single person has pointed out that the thread's title is a fabrication. This article was written by a Muslim human rights lawyer, yet the OP claims he's Jewish, and why if not to stir up hatred? I mean for fucks sake, there's this editor's note before the article even begins: Editor's note: Arsalan Iftikhar is an international human rights lawyer, founder of TheMuslimGuy.com and author of the book "Islamic Pacif…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 10:26 PM
2

That is not the reason it was withdrawn, though I've seen this repeated multiple times. I don't know why everyone thinks this since the judge's opinion is public record. The ballot was squashed because state law doesn't allow voter initiatives on medical procedures and the initiative was about all circumcision, not just religious.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 11:36 PM
7

I totally misspelled her last name. It's Sommers, not Summers. Apologies but I've been so focused on communicating with my academic adviser about this Summer semester that I was just typing on autopilot.
/r/MensRights25/06/12 08:02 PM
1

It has nothing to do with it and all claims to the contrary, including the ones made in response to you, are BS. She hasn't fled anything since she isn't charged with anything. People are telling you it's related because of citizenship despite the fact that there's no evidence she requested it. Since she didn't request it it's no different than someone, anyone, traveling to another country, any country.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 03:56 PM
1

It is incorrect and forbidden by some publication manuals (e.g., APA), as is the use of modern workarounds (i.e., "s/he") so it really leaves you in a tough place of having to spend excess time making a sentence where a plural pronoun makes sense, which isn't always possible.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 03:38 PM
2

They're talking about the average prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa, South Africa being only one country there so what you say about SA doesn't contradict what they said. South Africa has has an estimated 17.8% prevalence in adults, so it would be closer to or above 20% when factoring children. You also have sub-Saharan countries with less than 1% prevalence, assuming the statistics are considered reliable. Source: CIA World Factbook
/r/MensRights15/06/12 02:10 PM
2

But female genital mutilation is objectively worse. By what measures is it objectively worse? By the ones in your next paragraph, because those are bullshit. Female genital mutilation, the severing of the clitoris, is equivalent to cutting a penis in half. You should really have at least a basic understanding of a subject before making a self post to argue about it. The clitoris is not analogous to any part of the penis, and certainly not an arbitrary distinction like half of the penis. The clit…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 10:54 PM
7

This story needs to be regendered.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 01:14 PM
10

Solanas was the undeniably disturbed woman who shot Andy Warhol in 1968. Thomas James Ball, for example, who was hailed as a martyr on so many men’s rights forums, called for arson attacks on courthouses and police stations. The Norwegian mass killer Anders Breivik wrote extensively about the evils of feminism. Ahh yes, this isn't a new tactic by any means. When a woman commits or calls for criminal acts it is not really her fault because she is "disturbed," that is suffering from a psychologica…
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:59 PM
1

You all are the ones alienating people. You all cannot debate without automatically assuming someone is against you. What's crazy is you all are arguing with your feelings, that religion was the reason the San Fran initiative failed, against facts, that state medical law prevented any change from happening at local levels. The movement needs popular support, not support from people on reddit. The movement needs people who understand how the only way the procedure could be outlawed is by working …
/r/MensRights06/03/12 12:08 PM
1

I am against circmcision. Join who? I actually do fieldwork towards its end and I've yet to meet an MRA in real life. Since I fight it instead of whining on the internet I have to understand how the law works, something no one else here seems understand. You are the one who has shown zero understanding of the law and basic informal logic. When you realize you're full of shit you lie and say I'm attacking you and am for the procedure's legality. That which is unconstitutional is never technically…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:28 AM
1

I could care less who is you're enemy, as long as you're consistent and not a hypocrite. Make sure to never see a doctor who has not come out against the practice. Make sure to never visit a hospital where the procedure is performed. If these groups are your enemy, after all, you shouldn't be supporting them financially.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:39 PM
1

Anyone can file a suit to block voting on or the implementation of a new law. The only money you need is whatever the filing fee is. The San Fran Medical Society was a party to the suit. What happened was democracy. Medical practices are a state matter, not local. If the initiative was for a vote to change the state law people could say something, but that is not what the initiative was about. You in the same thought process think democracy is a good thing that was somehow circumvented that day …
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:13 PM
1

Reading his history I think the poster is a Palestinian or a Palestinian-ally. Then you are truly dense or need to learn better redditing skills. If someone is anti-circ it stands to reason some of there posts would be about the most common type of circumcision, elective circumcision in hospitals. His posts are only about Jewish circumcision. His sub is where he coordinates his sockpuppets from. He's been caught in our forums before saying antiJewish. Even last night he posted two stories, one t…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 02:03 PM
-3

What type of strawman is that? I made no such assertion that the law is in any way related to morality and I challenge you to point out where I did, but you won't be able to. A judge has to rule according to the letter of the law; that is a simple fact. If you want the procedure to end, you have to use legal mechanisms to stop it, something the San Fran intitiative did not do. It would be like a city voting to legalize all drugs; the state would either stop the ballot or allow it to proceed and …
/r/MensRights05/03/12 01:52 AM
-3

There were a number of groups, even medical ones without religious affiliation, who were party to the suit. That technicality is called the law; that decides what is legally permitted and what is not. If it wouldn't have been taken off the ballot it would have been blocked from being implemented or overturned immediately after implementation even if there was no such thing as religion because that is what the law required.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 01:01 AM
-4

I think you need to look at the literature again. While Kellogg and others contributed to its prevalence by promoting the practice to curb the sin of masturbation which they thought caused all kinds of health issues, the vast majority of circumcision today is the result of mistaken beliefs about its medicine. There are plenty of atheists who are for circumcision. This issue is not about religion and focusing there instead of on the refuting the medical myths takes resources away from where they …
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:58 AM
-2

An excuse? The San Franciso Medical Society was a party to the suit. That is the law of the state and that was how the judge had to find. If no one was protesting he would still have made the same ruling since doing anything else would be illegal. As long as that law exists there can be no local initiatives to prohibit any medical procedure. It was called a widely practiced medical procedure because it is the most common surgical procedure in the country.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:46 AM
-3

So you're saying that there is no state law saying medical regulation is a state issue that can't be changed locally.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:44 AM
-1

This is why it was defeated: Superior Court Judge Loretta Giorgi wrote that male circumcision is "a widely practiced medical procedure" and that medical services are left to the regulation of the state, not individual cities.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:31 AM
2

Maybe you're comfortable keeping company with erg0S4m. I don't know this person so I don't know why you keep bringing them up. I am talking about this thread and others and the poster responsible for them. That's what this conversation is about. I'm familiar with him and his sockpuppets from other threads where his antisemitism comes out. I am aware of his own sub where he links to Jew bashing sites where the upvote buttons are mini swastikas. And yes, regardless of what the ramblings on some bl…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:13 AM
3

People that care about the movement should care. When members of r/conspiracy, r/whitesrights, and all the other bigoted subs come here they should be called out. Maybe you're comfortable keeping such company but it turns many off from the movement, just like how the cartoons from the guy behind the San Fran circumcision ban turned a lot of people away from the movement.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 10:29 PM
1

What's your point, or do you just lack reading comprehension. The judge's ruling in that matter is already posted in this thread and has nothing to do with religion. They could have spent 10 times that much or nothing at all and the ruling would have been the same. Your link does not show Jews stopped the intitiative and is not even in relation to the poster's assertion (which was specifically about ritual circumcision).
/r/MensRights04/03/12 08:29 PM
1

I am following the money. The medical lobbies are the ones who stand to lose if the procedure is banned. That is why the practice remains legal here and in countries where there is no real Jewish population to speak of. If there were no Jews here the procedure would still be legal so the whole Jewish thing is a distraction, especially when littletiger posts. I was mutilated as an infant and wish the federal FGM law extended to males. I am actually a supporter of youth rights, not just someone hy…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:34 PM
1

A number of groups brought suits including the San Francisco Medical Society. Go on over to r/conspiracy with your nonsense (you can hang out with littletiger there).
/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:16 PM
0

It was not removed for any other reason, really? Superior Court Judge Loretta Giorgi wrote that male circumcision is "a widely practiced medical procedure" and that medical services are left to the regulation of the state, not individual cities. That is why the measure failed, not because of the Jews. A number of groups including SFMS sued adn the it was not allowed because the state is responsible for regulating medical procedures. Democracy doesn't work like you think it does. A city cannot vo…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:14 PM
-1

I never said there wasn't opposition, just that his assertion that: It's because the Jews stop any and every attempt we make at trying to ban the ritual genital mutilation of baby boys. is false. There have never been any notable attempts here to outlaw ritual circumcision. All attenpts to change circumcision are fought by the medical establishment more than religious groups. That's why the San Francisco initiative failed, because the judge ruled you can't limit a medical procedure allowed in th…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:04 PM
0

Your orignial assertion was: It's because the Jews stop any and every attempt we make at trying to ban the ritual genital mutilation of baby boys. The links you provide are not about ending religious circumcision, they are about ending all circumcision. The lawsuits brought meant nothing in the end. The courts decided for nonreligious matters to maintain the legality of the practice. Once again, per your original assertion, provide us with some links where Jews stopped an attempt to ban ritual c…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:00 PM
0

If there's such a long and distinguished list it shouldn't be difficult for a grand activist such as yourself to remember the name of a single prominenet court case or piece of legislation that dealt with the issue.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 04:35 PM
2

Antisemitic is used when people choose to only criticize Jews for a something practiced by many. You've never once criticized secular circumcision despite the fact that it happens far more often. You've never criticized circumcision in Islam. People know what you are. Is "misandric" just thrown around to silence any criticims of men? Oh that's right, you don't care about men's rights, you're just an "anti-Zionist."
/r/MensRights04/03/12 04:31 PM
-2

Please link me to notable attempts to stop this ritual that "the Jews" blocked. The vast majority of circumcisions in the US are nonreligious and are encouraged for nonreligious reasons.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 04:23 PM
-7

And here is littletiger back at it with more "antiZionism." Funny how the only submissions you've made regarding circumcision brings up Jews. Seeing as how they're less than 1% of the population it wouldn't be hard to find hundreds more articles relating to the much more common practice of non-religious circumcision. You've been called out in every thread so I feel obligated to do it here too. I also like that you actually stole this from r/atheism without so much as telling us it's a crosspost.…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:07 AM
5

Sure is a good thing that with my male privilege I would never have to worry about being a victim of violence or have to take steps to protect myself. /sarcasm Shit, I've been beaten with steel pipes and stabbed. I don't leave home without a knife, pepper spray if I'm wearing a jacket, and making sure my laces are tight enough to not come untied if I need to run.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 06:42 PM
6

I think we see the real reason you like the poster. A recent comment of yours: The problem is that there are Jews everywhere there too. Jewish women are especially annoying with their nasal voice and bossy attitude. With that in mind I think that a Jewish man who sticks to his kind commands respect. It's kind of like being a proud poop eater because that's how it's always been and you're damn well gonna stick to your established proud cultural identity.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 04:11 PM
6

When I see the r/conspiracy, r/WhiteRights, r/ManhoodAcademy, and r/anyotherbigotedsubs posters coming in here and trying to shape the discussion, I also don't want the posts there. They're usually topics that have been discussed (this specific woman has been discussed here three times). I'm pretty sure "anti-zionism" was put in quotes to show that those who know about littletigerwatch and his sockpuppets know he's anti-Jewish, not anti-Zionist. He does make the occasional post about circumcisio…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 04:06 PM
3

He dislikes it because it's Jewish. I'm anticirc and I'll never upvote a submission from him. He and his sockpuppets only cares about human rights if he can link it to Jews. His post history 90% to r/AmericanJewishPower, r/conspiracy, and r/BritishJewishPower. He's been debated on this topic before here. Just look at this submission. He says in the first part that she claims this has nothing to do with religion and then pretends like she contradicts herself. There was no contradiction at all and…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 03:50 PM
12

There are so many lies in that post. The author fails on all points, from anatomy to logic. About the author (with a pic in the link): LaVictoire is a 36-year-old, lesbian transgender woman and full-time graduate student at Goddard College. She had the first of her gender change surgeries in August, and soon, she will amend her birth certificate to reflect her true gender. Some members of the LGBT community have ongoing issues with her: Why I Was Banned at 'Lez' Get Real
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:51 PM
3

Can we get a link to this study in the sidebar, maybe under education discrimination because of all of the funding going to programs that are operating under false pretenses (as this study proves).
/r/MensRights26/02/12 10:07 PM
6

Civil-rights attorney Chester Darling agreed. “No one should go to court. It’s knuckle justice,” he said. “It’s a fair exchange.” So bumping into someone is a valid reason to be beaten by three people? This "civil rights attorney" seems to lack an understanding of civil rights and law.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 01:11 AM
1

I understand that those who post in r/atheism may often discuss one religion more than others depending on if they were raised by theists and the religious climate where they live, but people who only post to r/conspiracy, r/AmericanJewishPower, and r/BritishJewishPower and make there way into threads to highlight a single religion when nothing religious is being discussed can clearly be said to have alterior motives.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 02:21 PM
1

Right. You're just against Israel and as an atheist you also post in r/atheism. It just so happens your single post there was about a rabbi. Aren't atheists supposed to argue against all religion? Why have you not submitted anything about priests or imams? No one is falling for it.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 01:10 AM
1

You might be able to pull off that lie if it wasn't for your post about a Rabbi which has nothing to do with the state of Israel.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 12:29 AM
1

Check his posting history. 95% of his posts are to r/conspiracy, r/AmericanJewishPower, r/BritishJewishPower, r/ZOG (Zionist Occupied Government), and r/israelexposed. Oh, he did post to r/atheism to drum up Jewish hatred and in r/SubredditDrama to say: SRS is all about propaganda war. They will do anything to win that war. This is something they have learned from Zionists. You get the occasional bigot that come here to MR when a thread on circumcision comes up to start preaching about Jews.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 11:46 PM
1

I don't read things linked to by bigots with your posting history.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 11:36 PM
3

Exactly. Jews don't even believe non-Jews need to get circumcised and medical circumcision has nothing to do with religious circumcision, heck it's not even considered kosher. If you look through his post history you see there's another agenda he's pushing. He's a bigot masquerading as an intellectual humanitarian. Despite the fact that the vast majority of circumcisions in the US are done by the nonreligious, he makes his way into threads that are about nonreligious medical circumcision just to…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:00 PM
2

This article is about the WHO/UNAIDS recommendations, not US domestic policy.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 06:43 PM
3

Did you read the article? The biggest promoters are the WHO/UNAIDS and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, or are those organizations just Jewish activists in disguise?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 05:24 PM
5

I'm a paramedic and many med students here do a few rides with EMS. Though it doesn't happen often, doctors can also be called to the field to do an emergency procedure (eg., an emergency amputation). It's good for them to have an understanding of the dynamics of prehospital care and scenario based learning is a good tool since you can design any scenario you wish.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:04 PM
1

Why don't you email the organization to ask them what studies they're drawing their numbers from. Say you're writing a paper for school or something.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 05:54 PM
1

So you're about father's rights except for when it gets in the way of your ignorant nationalistic pride. You do realize there are still homes in rural parts of the country that draw their water from a well. Should we take away children that live in these homes and give them to rich families in the suburbs too?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 05:49 PM
7

Link to the brief: Pupils' progress: how children's perceptions influence their efforts
/r/MensRights16/02/12 11:02 PM
1

The Hippocratic oath is not required to become a doctor nor relevant to modern medical practice.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 05:14 PM
1

He has no idea what he's talking about basically. If you look at belief in evolution in European countries you see a great deal of variance with Latvia being relatively close to the US despite them not being on his list of countries that circumcise. I don't even see what connection he's trying to imply with the list since some of the African nations listed have nothing wrong with them and there are many countries not listed where society is much worse off. Also, seeing as how circumcision is sup…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 05:12 PM
1

I can't provide you with a medical education over reddit. Sorry but there's a million better things I could be doing with my time.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 03:56 PM
2

That was a big part of it, yes, but there were other things. It took me a while to find the community. I found Antimisandry.com first and then Reddit.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 03:31 PM
0

Once you get a proper education come back and argue. This is like debating with a high schooler. You're so off the plot that every line you type is a strawman.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 03:28 PM
3

Except in high profile cases and the rare exception you cannot expect much from public defenders.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 04:04 AM
9

I think we can see from some examples in that thread how despite SRS and feminists claiming they want equality, they really care more about shaming men that making progress. In response to the linked comment someone said: Good point, I would probably best identify as an egalitarian. Since I grew up a middle-class white boy in suburbia, I have no minority qualms for myself to be concerned with, so I figured I would just advocate for everyone (emphasis mine). That received 13 downvotes and the com…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 10:34 PM
28

I'll give some perspective of the double standard since I live in Cincinnati (where this happened). A month after I turned 18 my big sister called the police because she was worried because I was depressed about breaking up my girlfriend of 6 years. When they ask why she was worried and what she thought I would do she told them she was just worried and she knew I always had a pocket knife. Despite being miles away from her and only conversing by phone the police came and arrested me claiming I t…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:54 PM
1

The point was, if he was beaten too, where are the terrible injuries he sustained if you're going to question the point of the hospital in the first place. Did you not understand that you shouldn't be commenting without some basic knowledge in the sex differences between the integumentary system of a man and woman. Ah, doctors, what do they know? Doctors didn't order her to the hospital. Doctors largely practice defensive medicine for fear of lawsuits. People like you and her are the reason heal…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:58 PM
0

Were there hospital/ police photos of CB's injuries? So absence of proof is proof of absence? Learn a little about the integumentary system before making stupid comments. For ten years, but not medically. That's obvious. You have seen the photos of her face, right? Yep, and my face has looked worse before and most guys I know at some points. We don't go to hospitals unless there's broken bones or a need for sutures. This is a bit more than a scraped knee. Never said it wasn't. Was saying that so…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:38 PM
0

What does end up in the hospital mean? Have you ever worked at a hospital? People 'end up' there all the time for things they don't need to be there for. I would never say the person that came in with a scraped knee ended up in the hospital, I would say they took themselves to the hospital where they wasted a ton of money for something they should have gone home and put an ice pack on, the same as she should have done. I've received beatings multiple times worse than that with my face all kinds …
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:02 PM
6

I read that it said "functional" and thought that clearly doesn't make any sense or why would you bother posting that. I thought AD gave a speech or something and removed it. There's some gold in that thread. Remember, if you don't support SRS you are a pedophile or bitter because no women will have sex with you. And remember, they're not a downvote brigade even if comments get downvoted after they link to a thread because according to them Correlation != causation
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:34 PM
5

Now I'm curious. Do you by chance remember what it said before the edit or have a screen shot?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:18 PM
1

Ahh. I haven't really been there in a while since finding reddit. I should stop back by to see how the forums are going.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:10 PM
3

Most people can't be bothered or most people don't know. This is the first I've hear of any of these private subs or chat servers and I've posted here for a while and at antimisandry.com for a while before that.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:36 PM
1

I'm sorry, but that was a poorly written article. He goes on and on about how well the intactivists did at the hearing and how The senators and their supporters were obviously not expecting any kind of competition, and they got their asses handed to them. I have reason to suspect otherwise. I have friends who study public policy and go to many local, state, and federal hearings and from what they've told me about concerned citizens and organizations is that they always come woefully unprepared. …
/r/MensRights11/02/12 06:17 PM
1

I'm sure the national office would have more information from surveys and studies about why so few men sign up and initiatives they've undertaken to try to increase male volunteer interest. Keep in mind that due to fear of something happening to kids they might have a very restrictive screening process. I imagine a lot of people see that they have to pass a background check and think they shouldn't even try because of that disorderly conduct, pot, or open container charge they got in college. Pe…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:21 PM
2

I don't think this is about sexual abuse. Check out my other comment with an explanation.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 11:55 PM
7

That's a weird response. Spam emails are spam, they aren't people asking questions about an organization's policies. Confidentiality would be discussing the specifics about people involved in the program, not the program's policies. This seems like they're trying to blow you off completely. I thought you were talking about the national organization but now I see it's just the South Central Ohio one. If you tried contacting the national organization you could ask if this is a national policy or o…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 11:55 PM
1

Are you suggesting post hoc ergo propter hoc?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 11:32 PM
5

Wasn't Twilight already for women over 30?
/r/MensRights09/02/12 03:08 PM
3

Most of the trolls I've seen are pretty obvious and should just be ignored instead of all the responses I always see. I never liked the term concern troll. If you look at SRS they label anyone who raises a valid counter point a concern troll. I know trolls are the reason the place is how it is now, but I've stopped coming on here as much as I used to simply because it gets tiresome to see people who go against the grain having to defend themselves as not being trolls and the way the overreaction…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:55 PM
1

Where do you see that there being trolls here is to my liking?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:37 PM
2

That's not really the point of this thread though. I didn't create a thread to say we need to stop calling people trolls who don't agree with us, I just responded to the OPs statement about it happening on other subs. I was here before AMR and SRS and while there were some trolls back then, it was nowhere near the level it is now. I'm not going to waste my time though, no offense, scrolling back months in my history to dig up a those responses where I was called a troll by nontroll members here.…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:35 PM
10

I've seen that happen a lot and it pisses me off. There's a lot of users here who are also r/libertarian posters who are fundamentally opposed to our (the US) prison system. You'll never see me calling for 5 years for either sex in the case of, say for instance, a 25 year old teacher's aid having consensual with a 17 year old student just because somewhere, in some state, at some time in the past, a man has gotten that sentence. Making things worse for women doesn't make them better for men. Tha…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:20 PM
5

I don't remember. It's happened twice I think. This was a bit ago and I actually stopped posting here for a bit because of how upvoted the comment that I was a troll was and how the thread devolved into a huge circlejerk. I've seen a big change in this place over the last 6 months.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:05 PM
9

I posted this the other day. It's old but I was happy to learn some feminist skeptics are against the dubious scholarship in their field and its effects on other fields. The Battle Between Political Agendas and Science: Rational Feminism Explores the Gender Politics of Science
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:34 PM
27

This isn't unique to any one side. I've been called a feminist troll here for disagreeing with a point despite never posting to any of the feminist boards and being one of the most active members on the r/AMR list.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:26 PM
16

See my above comment. I was typing it as you left this. It's the overall culture of how the police can never view men as victims, only criminals. There's a few links in my other comment.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 03:13 PM
9

Let's see, this is not the first time this has happened to a man. The Spearhead has reported on this issue. The majority of veterans are men and the police are being trained to treat them as dangerous criminals. The police are trained in other arenas to view men who are victims as criminals (predominate aggressor).
/r/MensRights07/02/12 03:10 PM
42

This isn't the first time a guy has been screwed over after police responded to supposedly help. There is a pattern of men who needed help being treated like criminals by the police. Just think of the predominate aggressor rule the police follow where the only possible outcomes is for the man to be the abuser, never the victim. What Happens When You Call the Cops to “Help” a Man Mom called 911 because son seems depressed over divorce, he's now doing 7 years after cops searched his car and found …
/r/MensRights07/02/12 03:07 PM
1

Found this while doing some digging for an assignment on feminist therapy I have to do for a counseling class.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:02 PM
23

In my state this is a very serious crime. It's a Felony 1. 2927.24 Contaminating substance for human consumption or use or contamination with hazardous chemical, biological, or radioactive substance - spreading false report of contamination. (B) Except as provided in division (D) of this section, no person shall do any of the following: (1) Knowingly mingle a poison, hazardous chemical, biological, or radioactive substance, or other harmful substance with a food, drink, nonprescription drug, pre…
/r/MensRights06/02/12 04:01 PM
1

A week at bare minimum. Three would be better.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:56 PM
2

Props for bringing references.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:03 PM
2

Right. If a birth certificate is a legal document why are we so indifferent to filling out information that is known to be false (father)? Hell, even job applications at McDonalds has a paragraph saying that falsifying information is a crime which carries the risk of imprisonment and fines.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:57 PM
2

Gotcha. Don't forget Biden in that assessment. I'd say he's more dangerous in that regard than Clinton.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 12:03 AM
1

I'm not referring to the man from the article but the Social Democrats party which has facist roots. There's not really an equivalent in the US. They would be similar to the British National Party though.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:13 PM
1

Being on a committee doesn't mean anything in regard to your personal position on an issue. You'll find some of the members of the United Nations Human Rights Council are huge abusers of human rights. Sweden also claims to be all for egalitarianism and is a considered one of the most (if not the most) feminist countries yet until they ended military conscription in 2010 it was only men who were drafted. They also were all for affirmative action in universities when it benefited women but decided…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:16 PM
1

I'm against circumcision, but we have to understand these things in a historical perspective. The Sweden Democrats are a xenophobic party with fascist roots. That coupled with other things being brought up in the debate, like kosher meat, it is easy to see why people are thinking this is anti-Jewish.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 05:41 PM
1

When the Sweden Democrats are one of the groups bringing forward the bill it is easy to see why that would be thought. That and: During a debate broadcast on Radio Sweden, Mr Westerberg took the campaign a step further. He objected to the import of kosher meat... So this can't be said to only be a campaign against genital mutilation if they're using it as a forum to bring up other things. In this context you could see how it would be perceived as anti-Jewish and not just anti-circumcision. It wo…
/r/MensRights03/02/12 05:29 PM
5

No shit it would suck to be the other guy. "Well sir the good news is you have a daughter. You're a dad...Congrats!! The bad news is you missed her entire childhood. She's 19 now and may or may not want to meet you. You also owe $150,000 to be paid within the next year."
/r/MensRights03/02/12 03:32 AM
5

When you speak with the school tell them you'll also be contacting your state's Board of Reagents. Curriculum has to be approved before it is taught. If you can show the curriculum is not being followed, especially if material isn't being covered for the sake of non-nutrition work, then your complaint has some weight.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 03:24 AM
-1

That was the point of my posting this. If this was the first time I heard anything like this from him I wouldn't think anything of it, but as you can see from my comment above he has a history of making comments like this. We can also look at his track record supporting feminists projects, and his VP Biden who is a darling of many feminist groups.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 09:17 PM
5

So when Obama said the following was it also a throw away comment? Because of the campaign that Hillary Clinton waged, my daughters and all of your daughters will forever know that there is no barrier to who they are and what they can be in the United States of America. They can take for granted that women can do anything that the boys can do -- and do it better, and do it in heels. Has he ever said anything positive about boys?
/r/MensRights01/02/12 08:48 PM
1

What city is the event in out of curiosity? We've had a sexual health event pushed off for months (Hip Hop for Health) because the Health Department has always fallen through with the promised testing supplies.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 07:19 PM
5

You should have seen me in one of my sociology classes with a huge list of studies and my own written analysis debating circumcision with 24 people. I was the only one against and the only one with data. Besides them not producing any evidence, I was finally shut down by the professor who said she talked to her friend who is a nurse practitioner who told her that it's a great procedure.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 03:54 PM
1

I understand that, it was joke.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 07:01 PM
2

So what's the solution to this problem? More women's shelters More laws protecting women Greater police powers Invasion of foreign countries Stop giving them ideas.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 05:29 PM
5

I'll believe she wants equality when she introduces a bill to ban circumcision of infant boys.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 02:26 PM
1

I didn't mean that it wasn't already, just that it's a really important issue and should be one of our main focuses.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 01:11 AM
1

IMO prison reform should be a key issue for the MRM.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 12:59 AM
7

Lists like these need to be better sourced and correct. I wrote a 15 page paper on fatherlessness and used some of these lists as a starting point. You can't just give a quote like "50% of mothers see no value in the father's continued contact with his children" and say see this whole book. If you're referring to a specific statistic, give the page number. Since most original research is published in journals and not books, cite the actual study. Citing second hand sources is sloppy and inevitab…
/r/MensRights31/01/12 12:57 AM
2

Thanks for posting this. It's Domestic Violence Week in one of my human services classes and this will add to my list of studies to reference in my paper.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 08:16 PM
8

This is taking place in Sweden. Why am I not surprised?
/r/MensRights29/01/12 05:24 AM
1

Of course you read it, assuming a mind such as yours is capable, but nice try trying to get a rise. tldr: The troll arguments is what many here throw against facts. I've been posting here longer than you and was part of the SRS/aMR list of most active users.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 03:28 AM
0

In case you couldn't tell, the whole point of my posts is that this doesn't deserve debate, so why would I adhere to informal logic.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 09:25 PM
2

As I said above, if your post doesn't gets caught in the Spam filter, message the mods. Is your attempt at a downvote brigade so important it couldn't wait for a mod to release your post? I for one hope all your posts get caught in the spam filter since you don't seem to bring anything of substance to this sub. Not being able to wait 5 minutes for the mods to remove your post from spam is sad, lazy, and pathetic. "Quick, no time to wait...I must post again. It is imperative r/MensRights have thi…
/r/MensRights26/01/12 09:14 PM
1

If your post gets caught in the Spam filter, message the mods. Is your attempt at a downvote brigade so important it couldn't wait for a mod to release your post? I for one hope all your posts get caught in the spam filter since you don't seem to bring anything of substance to this sub. Edit: Typo
/r/MensRights26/01/12 09:10 PM
5

Fuck off troll. See my above comment.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 08:59 PM
4

SO why are you posting the same damn shit multiple times? Were you pissed no one backed you up the last time so you though you would reword things to make yourself feel better? Posted by Waram (OP) 1 hour before this thread: Is this line of thinking product of rape hysteria? (aka. 'rape culture') Original thread by AppleGods My replies to her ridiculous self-victimization. Make sure to click open the [+2] children tab after her reply to my comment, so you can see the conversation further. And pl…
/r/MensRights26/01/12 08:58 PM
13

If that's the case, tell him to "get back with her" and record everything. Have him tell her he's glad it's all over but he just wants to know why she lied. Record all that shit and lawyer up. There would be some hefty lawyer fees at first, but he'd be able to recoup it all after the civil suit for her filing a false police report and lying under oath to have him imprisoned without cause. He'd get his record overturned and she would then get to know what living with a record is like.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 08:40 PM
1

If I was a judge I would ask you what the fuck you were doing in my courtroom and tell you to get out since this has nothing to do with you. Who made you the Reddit judge of I'll tell you if you were raped or not? You clearly don't want an objective opinion on the issue since you already tried to frame the issue by saying "My replies to her ridiculous self-victimization" instead of "My replies to her." Since this issue isn't in front of the judge, are there any other hypothetical situations you …
/r/MensRights26/01/12 08:35 PM
-2

You seem to not know the definition of either of the terms you used. I could care less about being downvoted, I care about blatant falsehoods being upvoted. And since they continue to be upvoted, I can only assume my initial assessment of r/MensRights to be correct. I thought this community was about dispelling falsehoods. The community now seems to care more about saving face that it does about the truth.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 05:10 PM
-3

No, I got 4 downvotes while he got 4 upvotes. I know how the auto system works. He's got even more since I left. This place has literally become a joke filled with attacking people who may or may not have been raped (what business is it of ours?) in other threads, blatant lies being upvoted, and active members being called trolls and told to "die already" because they try to correct a lie being told. I no longer believe this sub to be any more rational than any of the feminist ones. When people …
/r/MensRights26/01/12 02:23 PM
-3

Hmmm. Welcome to r/MensRights where people posting the truth are the retarded ones. Do you have a single shred of evidence to back up you assertion? Of course not. Troll? I had the honor of being one of the most active users of this sub when r/SRS put out their shit list. I never post in any of the feminist subs. Just tired of all the idiot MRAs. Wishing death on someone? Now I see why more people are leaving this sub. Herp derp his comment sounds good, UPVOTES. You told a blatant lie which peop…
/r/MensRights26/01/12 02:17 PM
7

But female circumcision does protect against HIV. Women who had undergone FGC had a significantly decreased risk of HIV-2 infection when compared to those who had not. Kanki, P., S.M. Boup, R Marlink, et al. (1992). “Prevalence and Risk Determinants of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 (HIV-2) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1 (HIV-1) in West African Prostitutes.” American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 136 No. 7. pp. 895-907. The risk of HIV among women who had undergone FGC was roughly …
/r/MensRights26/01/12 05:10 AM
-15

Except Jewish ritual circumcision is provided my a mohel who wouldn't receive payment from Medicaid, but nice nonargument though. Your upvotes show how ignorant those in this thread are. Edit: Awww, look at all the butthurt guys continuing to upvote a demonstratively false assertion and downvote the truth. And you guys claim to be the rational.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 05:03 AM
2

However, the state then lost the same amount in matching federal funds. Wait, do the feds match state expenditures on circumcision?
/r/MensRights26/01/12 04:56 AM
3

My first girlfriend's dad said let's go on a walk and when we were clear he pushed me against a wall and pulled a sword out of the cane he was walking with and put it to my throat and told me if I ever hurt his daughter he'd kill me. I was 14.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 03:11 PM
6

Exhibitionism: 100% men Tell that to Joe Francis and the millions of dollars he earned with the Girls Gone Wild series.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 12:40 AM
2

Stop being so bitter about blatant discrimination against men who are drafted to die. Take it like a man.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 04:20 AM
1

Completely agree.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 04:43 PM
1

Slight correction, it's the benefits of consuming breast milk, not breast feeding. Pumps are inexpensive and many breastfeeding mothers use them to store bottles of extra milk for convenience and to give their nipples a rest. There's no reason the mother can't supply bottles of her breast milk to the father for when the child will be with him.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 04:30 PM
1

SDPD refused to do more than a police report, despite my neighbors seeing her. I'm sure they were too busy going after real criminals, like consenting adults entering into mutually beneficial contracts with other consenting adults (ie, drug dealers).
/r/MensRights05/01/12 04:27 PM
5

Well, it is a well established fact that jews are stingy, no matter how you want to spin it, they are stingy, and thousands of people will agree with that. Well, it is a well established fact that men are rapists, no matter how you want to spin it, they are rapists, and thousands of people will agree with that. Well, it is a well established fact that women are cunts, no matter how you want to spin it, they are cunts, and thousands of people will agree with that. Argumentum ad populum can work w…
/r/MensRights04/01/12 06:29 PM
1

A sockpuppet that has been posting here for over 3 years longer than I have been?
/r/MensRights04/01/12 06:21 PM
0

I heaped your comments, not insults. So, according to your comments, you think it is a fact that: Jews are stingy. Jews control the media. The Holocaust justifies hatred of the Jews.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 05:51 PM
-5

No they're not, but those who think his statement is a valid point might want to reexamine its meaning given the posters comment history. Countries all over the world posture like that, but his comment focused on an entire religion, not the state actors responsible for the comments. If we don't support people making statements about all women or all men, why should we support any blanket generalizations? Hell just look at the +5 comment he made below: Well, it is a well established fact that jew…
/r/MensRights04/01/12 05:49 PM
2

Yes but enough MensRights people have been here and he keeps getting more upvotes.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 05:44 PM
0

Opps. That was supposed to say MensRightsers, as in those here who did upvote.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 05:09 PM
0

Stay classy MensRightsers upvoting antisemites: And after that, we are called “antisemites” whenever we say jews are fucking stingy and don’t want to pay. If you look at any TV program or movies credits, you’ll see a who’s who of jewish society. So it’s pretty obvious that US media is wholly owned by zionists. That’s pretty stupid, because if anything, the shoah (the Holocaust) justifies pretty well the hatred of jews… The little jew ran to his father: — Pappa! Pappa! — Yes, my son? — Pappa! Can…
/r/MensRights04/01/12 04:44 PM
9

Here is a story from this year about a woman there being sent to jail for refusing to allow her husband a divorce since 1996 (so there can't be cries about patriarchy since both the man and woman can screw the other). The Rabbis do not have the authority to force someone to go to "prison." Anyone who wants to in Israel, or here in the US and in many other countries with a sizable Jewish community, can elect to go to a Beit Din to have their case heard in a religious setting. All participants hav…
/r/MensRights04/01/12 03:48 PM
6

Tom Bale '63 Perhaps we could create an honorary space for him on RegisterHer.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:25 AM
5

Are we sure this isn't institutional sexism? This is the part that should be focused on: As the evacuation began, with the plane beginning to sink slowly into the water, it was women and children first, with the three flight stewards on board carrying out the evacuation drill. Does the official evacuation drill as carried out by the flight stewards call for women and children to be evacuated first? "I was saying "relax, relax, women and children first," said passenger Jeff Kolodjay. "Then the pl…
/r/MensRights31/12/11 07:55 PM
5

Just sent an email to SAVE with a link the the story asking if they would contact Las Vegas Metro Police about the statement.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 09:41 PM
8

If a male guard caught a female prisoner masturbating he would be dismissed after being found guilty of voyeurism.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 05:56 PM
1

And my point is parents (mothers) saw their children circumcised without anesthetic until around 10 years ago when anesthesia was recommended without any qualms and it never ended the practice so his assertion is patently false.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 12:49 AM
1

Umm..no, not really. The use of anesthetic in circumcision (and other newborn procedures) is a relatively new (and not always practiced) development. If your assertion was true, circumcision would have stopped ages ago. Babies aren't generally circumcised in their birth rooms so most parents are wholly ignorant of what the procedure entails.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 03:41 PM
1

Thanks for clearing that up. I was trying to open the study itself for clarification but there was an issue with my browser.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 03:00 AM
1

Confused a bit. You said: For a positive response to completed forced penetration, a woman answers yes to any of the following questions: • When you were drunk, high, drugged, or passed out and unable to consent, how many people ever had vaginal sex with you? By vaginal sex, we mean that {if female: a man or boy put his penis in your vagina} {if male: a woman or girl made you put your penis in her vagina}? Why does if say "if male: a woman or girl made you put your penis in her vagina" if the qu…
/r/MensRights16/12/11 01:59 AM
1

Video of the cop punishing boys. A larger question is why are the Indian police allowed to act as judge and jury and mete out punishment on the spot. We've seen this before with men being caught riding in the women's train cars being forced to do squats.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 04:02 AM
44

Many of those comments are ridiculous. They actually defend the woman and shame the steward, airline, judge, and newspaper. Luckily, they were rightfully downvoted but it's scary there are so many people that think that way. (1)All I want to say is that the steward is no gentleman to have reported her to the police for sexual assault. That is a victim response and I suspect that financial compensation is in the air. It dilutes and nullifies REAL sexual assaults 99pc of which are men harrassing w…
/r/MensRights28/11/11 05:17 PM
2

So the one woman admitted on camera to providing drugs for the man (drug trafficking), not releasing him when he demanded (kidnapping or false imprisonment), and continuing to cut him despite his protests (battery and felonious assault) but they have been released. I've seen a lot of crazy stories linked to from here, but I'm really having a hard time getting my head around this.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 12:44 AM
1

Did you read the article? The man is alive so negligent manslaughter and murder are definitely out.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 12:42 AM
39

For years, students have asked why a similar space does not exist exclusively for men. Some give the Title IX argument — referring to a federal statute on equal gender treatment — saying that both genders should have access to the same types of facilities. On the other hand, the room is also not available to professors and postdocs — it’s intended to be a comfortable place for students to relax. On the other hand, here is an argument not related in the slightest to the preceding one. WTF. They b…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 04:05 AM
7

Too bad he settled. It would have been nice if the case went to court where a judge could have ruled on the illegality of the practice.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 04:24 PM
1

The link was also posted to the WTF subreddit. A commenter there did the leg work and posted the contact information. Just giving credit where it's due.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:23 PM
2

From the r/WTF comments: Send the Opinions Editor an email, I did: Ms. Dolski [email protected] and If you want to contact the author directly: https://www.facebook.com/alex.manley Before anyone says this is posting personal information, this is a 'journalist' writing under his own name. No special digging was needed to find this. Just a Google search of their real name that is provided on the article that he wrote and signed to his real name. It's public information anyone could find…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:52 PM
9

They even attack one man's masculinity: Shere Dore Evan... dude... why do u like to fight me so much? Im not the only one who spoke up you fucking bully! You ALWAYS have some shit to say to ME when I speak up but never have balls to address the others. Go ahead & attend. I promise you that you wont like what I have to say!
/r/MensRights08/11/11 03:23 AM
1

Crimmins allegedly took the wet tampon -- which her lawyer claims she dipped in a lime cordial mix -- and proceeded to dab the women's hygiene product on the McDonald's employee's hand. So often we see the media label men accused of rape as rapists and refuse to use the word allegedly in reference to their supposed crimes. This woman, even after accepting the facts and being found guilty in a court of law is still said to have allegedly acted this way. In any event, screw her. She is no victim. …
/r/MensRights03/11/11 10:52 AM
5

The Refugee Law Project (RLP), housed on a low hill in a quiet residential area in the Ugandan capital, receives up to 10 male rape victims some days, compared to an average of eight women a day. Lara Stemple from the University of Los Angeles, conducted a study two years ago entitled 'Male Rape and Human Rights.' She warns men are being ignored. 'Male victims have been neglected for a long time in all regions of the world. And anywhere where homosexuality is severely stigmatized, male victims w…
/r/MensRights29/10/11 08:28 PM
20

Together, both globally and locally, women and children vastly outnumber adult men, especially white men. Once again women choose to group themselves with children. Yet, to date, OWS has centralized men’s interests and particularly white men’s interests, even though they are a tiny minority of the global and local population. Has she been to, or seen any footage of, the Occupy protests? The majority of people there are men who happen to be white. We are sick of the “double day”- getting paid les…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 02:19 AM
1

That review sounds about right because a lot of the story adds up with what Victoria said in an interview. What he wrote on the bill actually makes a lot of sense after reading this: My girlfriend responded with a joke about counting her calories... the waitress countered with some snarky comment about "you could use a little extra weight" (in retrospect this might have been a compliment, but my girlfriend has struggled with anorexia and didn't appreciate it)...
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:45 AM
22

The man has received all types of death threats and if you read the comments of the waitress's Facebook page all her friends could care less, some saying she shouldn't even have to apologize. I think a nice libel lawsuit is in order. At least this time when she falsely accused someone of something, unlike the last time, no one went to jail.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 02:15 PM
2

Yeah, it must have been ladies night at the courthouse.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 01:57 PM
10

So according to feminists: Calling an ex after a breakup is stalking and domestic violence. and Deleting their number thereby removing the temptation to call is also domestic violence. We can't win guys.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:45 PM
3

Swingley set bail at $250,000, which is $50,000 more than prosecutors recommended. That's a very small amount for a first degree murder case.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:27 PM
8

From the linked article: We recognize that classifications based upon average physical differences between the sexes could be invalid in certain situations involving equal employment opportunity, participation in sports and other areas. Have their cake and eat it too.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 10:11 PM
12

Well, if violence that leads to death is legal if preceded by consent then there is no argument the state can make against bringing back dueling. Anyway, it really doesn't matter if there was consent or not. There are plenty of similar cases that result in a charge of negligent homicide, manslaughter, or something similar. But wait, there's one more thing: There was music, alcohol, even a cake. .............. Defence attorney Ira Goldstein said in his opening statement that because the punch was…
/r/MensRights05/10/11 09:42 AM
5

The minimum marriage contract would be for two years and could be renewed if the couple stays happy. The contracts would include provisions on how children and property would be handled if the couple splits. Oh how the family courts here would be furious would something like this get proposed. They wouldn't like the idea of being made nearly obsolete.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 03:46 PM
21

Holy shit. I was expecting to read that he was captured by the Nazis and chemically castrated in a camp. Come to find out it happened in "civilized" England. It's amazing how such a punishment was meted out given his patriotic history.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 06:02 PM
2

Randomly found this in the "recent petitions" sections. It was created 9/22/11 and currently has 166 signatures. Let's see how many we can get once Reddit becomes involved.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 06:58 PM
3

Thanks. Wow, that's an old program too. If we wanted to know the time frame before the California program would be extended to men, we could look to other programs initially designed for women to see if they're offered to men yet. In this instance, it looks like the Cook County program has been operating for 12 years and still isn't being offered to men.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:12 PM
3

So if a man is imprisoned for a nonviolent crime leaving the mother to be the primary caregiver who is then imprisoned for a nonviolent crime only she would be let out. Right.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 05:10 PM
2

Can you provide a link to your state's program? Thanks.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 05:08 PM
17

The majority of the comments are about him being an asshole. I would think there would be a bigger interest in the ease with which the girl falsely claimed rape. While cheating is certainly morally wrong, lying about rape is on a whole other level with far reaching consequences.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 03:07 AM
4

I hope the case turns out well. If it can be entered into the public record that this was a case of intentional battery, it's a much smaller feat to challenge from that position that all non-medically necessitated ones, regardless of what the parents want, are also battery.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 10:32 AM
2

"Did you lie last year to detectives when you told them you only had sex with Sara Cole three or four times?" prosecutor Timothy S. Moore asked..."Yes," the youth instantly said...the teen said he believed last year that telling the truth about the 3 1/2-month affair with the 47-year-old woman would "make me look bad and I wanted to save her (Cole)." Already at his young age he's learned he, the male, will be looked upon as a predator by society and has been indoctrinated to sacrifice himself f…
/r/MensRights20/09/11 10:29 AM
3

She sounds like a mess: Parents house is not an option. I am currently living with my grandmother and my living expenses are 0 and I still cannot make ends meet. It is a really bad time right now. So he's the only one supporting the kid right now. I've no idea how someone can't make ends meet with zero living expenses.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 12:31 AM
4

That's in the presence of physical evidence, but as a general rule you shouldn't for reasons they outline here.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 11:15 PM
3

Rule #1: Do not talk to the police. Rule #2: DO NOT TALK TO THE POLICE. This applies to all things.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 10:26 PM
5

While I'm glad that the parents aren't circumcising, I don't like the argument that it's because she wants the child to identify with the father. That same non-argument is used all too often by parents choosing to circumcise so the baby looks like the father.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 03:18 PM
1

I know right. He's clearly a much better man than the guy who engaged in nonviolent behavior and is only locked up because the state has to keep the status quo. Being a drug dealer/user just means he's not a tool who allows the state to dictate all his behaviors, not that he's a bad father.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 03:16 PM
4

If anyone is wondering why they went from upvotes to (in some cases) negatives it's because of two downvote brigades. one two
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:28 AM
4

Consistently isn't a good word choice. It's about half and half in states where cases have been brought challenging ladies nights. Actually, if you discount the states where the courts simply refused to hear the case as opposed to actually ruling.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 07:22 PM
-10

This cannot be stressed enough. Get FIRE involved even if its after the fact. Ask if they'll write a letter to the school requesting the justification for mandatory attendance.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 04:34 PM
35

Let me at least say that it seems like race played a big part in why these men were selected to give up their seats, especially in light of what employees said about how the bar operates and treats people of color, but the policy itself is a sexist one and that shouldn't be lost in all the talk about race.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 02:22 PM
2

I just posted a story about the sham that is woman-owned businesses if you're interested in hearing a woman describe what BS the concept really is. (http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/k892s/confessions_of_a_womanowned_business_owner_how_i/)[http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/k892s/confessions_of_a_womanowned_business_owner_how_i/]
/r/MensRights08/09/11 01:10 AM
2

This should be crossposted to WTF.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 04:31 PM
2

It's something, though not much at all for what he went through. Keep in mind, the way his case was handled is exactly how the new Title IX requirements will ensure all cases are handled. Maybe after enough lawsuits like this schools will fight back against the new requirements.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 04:00 PM
2

Best of luck Kloo. Take some time to clear your life of clutter. Take care of yourself. G-d bless.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 07:15 PM
3

I remember that they tried it in India and their government even chased males on the streets to force them to go for circumcision. This is something I'm going to have to research.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 09:48 AM
3

Look at the cap again. Those stories are all of the "Editors' Picks." Out of all of the news happening in the world, this is what that media source found to be the most pressing.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 11:24 PM
5

Yeah I didn't mean to come at you like you did anything wrong. Most people don't know how the system works until it's too late.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 03:56 PM
3

If there was a stenographer (which should always be requested) you should have posted the transcript to your state's judicial ethics review board. The judge was in clear violation of his oath when he made that statement. Not saying it would have done any good necessarily, but that's where indy media comes in.
/r/MensRights28/08/11 03:07 PM
37

Police said a domestic-incident report was filed, and confirmed Drena was accused of punching Young. There were no arrests because there were no injuries. The battered former beau, who had cuts on his arms... Does not compute.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 01:22 PM
0

No one is talking about rape, especially not some oversimplified hypothetical case you just threw out. The poster begins the post by excusing her actions and ends by stating it isn't a men's rights issue. The person replying first agrees that it isn't child abuse. If it's not a story that belongs in this sub, then posters should state that and leave it at that. When they start actually commenting on specifics they are inviting debate. The poster is implying that this is a legitimate way to disci…
/r/MensRights24/08/11 05:43 PM
2

Haven't you read the comments? This isn't abuse according to the people with the upvotes. That's akin to soap in the mouth....But honestly I think everyone involved is making a bigger deal out of a form of corpreal punishment. It's just back to kids being coddled. God forbid little Johnny's or little Susie's feelings are hurt ever. and I agree with you. She didn't hurt the little bastard.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 05:41 PM
-1

I think you should learn what a leap is. Saying someone who supports the actions of a person found guilty by a jury of child abuse is someone who supports child abuse is not a leap, it is a fact.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 05:18 PM
0

The article is talking about a case based on a video in which the reasoning the mother gives for punishment is him getting in trouble at school. I'm not talking about spanking, I'm talking about the actions of the mother which include making the child hold hot sauce in his mouth and forcing him to take a cold shower. These things are child abuse and the woman was found guilty of child abuse, so anyone saying her actions are acceptable means they support child abuse.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 05:17 PM
0

The article is talking about a case based on a video in which the reasoning the mother gives for punishment is him getting in trouble at school. I'm not talking about spanking, I'm talking about the actions of the mother which include making the child hold hot sauce in his mouth and forcing him to take a cold shower. These things are child abuse and the woman was found guilty of child abuse, so anyone saying her actions are acceptable means they support child abuse.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 05:17 PM
0

Look at all the upvotes they got. Clearly the right to beat children is a men's rights issue. We wouldn't want to coddle the 'little bastards.'
/r/MensRights24/08/11 04:52 PM
1

I already stated that the men's issue comes in when you take into account they way boys are punished at schools in higher proportions than girls, even for the same behaviors. Since that was the source of the abuse, we can say it stems from a men's rights issue. Regardless of whether it belongs or not, someone who advocates abusing a child is being upvoted.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 04:52 PM
0

And those comments get downvoted to hell in r/MR. Check my 'Crazy circumcision comment roundup' thread and others. Within minutes of me posting this thread, both comments received more upvotes.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 04:22 PM
5

Seven women and two men comprise the nine-member jury. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 04:18 PM
-2

That's akin to soap in the mouth. Granted I think she's way too bossy and bitchy and going overboard. But honestly I think everyone involved is making a bigger deal out of a form of corpreal punishment. It's just back to kids being coddled. God forbid little Johnny's or little Susie's feelings are hurt ever. Someone please explain to me where men's rights part of this is. That's a +6 comment. Not akin to soap in the mouth at all. Yeah, it's a shame how much kids are coddled today, not like in th…
/r/MensRights24/08/11 03:55 PM
6

You're right. Why should we consider bodily integrity to be a worthwhile issue? How presumptuous of us. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights24/08/11 03:43 PM
31

Haven't you heard? No one in this forum has ever taken a Women's Studies or any other class that deals with feminist theory, nor have we read any books on the subject. This is sarcasm, of course.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 03:30 PM
1

I'm in Ohio. I'm not saying it's true or in statutes, just that it is taught in concealed carry classes (or rather, has been taught since I can't speak for all classes).
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:08 PM
6

In my state during the concealed carry course you are told exactly that, that you must retreat into a different room until there are no more rooms to flee to and you are cornered completely before you can use deadly force in your home. That is what the state attorney general said.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 09:55 PM
1

What type of treatment do women deserve exactly? Why should we care more if something was done to our mother or sisters than our fathers?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:08 AM
3

Nan Stein & Dominic Cappello, Gender violence/Gender justice: An Interdisciplinary Teaching Guide for Teachers of English, Literature, Scocial Studies, Psychology, Health, Peer Counseling, and Family and Consumer Science. Wellesley College Center for Research on Women, 1999. In what world would the proposed scenario have any place in an English, Literature, or Social Studies class, assuming it would be an acceptable lesson in any class that is?
/r/MensRights22/08/11 01:05 PM
7

The fact that there's no overwhelming reason for it to be done is the basis of the overwhelming reason why it should NOT be done. In the absence of a clear and convincing reason for surgery to be performed, it should not be, especially on someone incapable of consenting.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 02:16 AM
4

Thanks. Fixed.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 11:35 PM
6

The title of the thread is the actual title of the article and comes from a quote from the judge. Are you suggesting the titles of articles be editorialized before posting? That's what you guys do at /aMR, like when you linked to this thread you made the title a quote you said yourself and no one agreed with, giving it the appearance that one of the posters here said it.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 03:38 PM
3

Where exactly did anyone say that?
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:07 PM
0

I don't think that word means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 01:49 PM
10

It was an added bonus that the doctor used a local anesthetic, they said. It's sad that what should be standard, providing pain relief for a surgical procedure, is considered a bonus.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 01:32 AM
13

Well it's only sexually abusing a 6 year old. If she had, say, sold even a gram of pot on the other hand, I'm sure no leniency would be granted and she'd be serving her full sentence.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 02:30 PM
8

But..but...feminists fight for men too!!!
/r/MensRights18/08/11 12:50 AM
9

They have them in lots of places: South Korea Britain Germany
/r/MensRights17/08/11 06:39 PM
2

Definitely, especially since your post got downvoted. Even my post which just told him to evaluate evidence and not be biased got downvoted. With all the talk about mistrial, I got curious about what all was covered. According to the first link I went on, this is grounds for a mistrial: Do not consult any dictionaries for the meaning of words or any encyclopedias for general information on the subjects of this trial...Do not get copies of any statutes that may be referred to in court. It seems t…
/r/MensRights17/08/11 04:52 PM
1

I've never served on a jury, nor will I ever be given the opportunity to because of having a record from when I was 18 (non-violent drug offense). My dad once served, decades ago, on a child molestation case. His memory isn't so good (Alzheimers) so I've not been able to get any real details, but he says even though they 'knew' the guy was guilty, there just wasn't enough evidence and the jury voted not guilty. Now, knowing what we know today from psychology research into biases, what they thoug…
/r/MensRights17/08/11 02:49 PM
2

Ajay sounds like a real winner, especially when they called the CDC a "stupid site." It's great that she's "deff right" and knows more than the nation's public health organization. It's ironic how Sheldon says you misrepresented the issue by bringing up "silly societal preferences" and then goes directly on to prove your point. I'm Jewish so I can't say for sure, but isn't circumcision frowned upon in traditional Christianity/Catholicism? Anyway, props for attempting to fight the good fight. It'…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 10:40 PM
1

I'd be interested in reading in reading the updated thread, though I would understand if you didn't want to post it.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 09:35 PM
5

All our brains are fucked up, it's just a matter of extent.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 09:34 PM
5

This is where the battle between parental rights and youths rights get tricky. Clearly this woman is completely ignorant and the fact that she lists not wanting skin hanging off before cleanliness shows that this is nothing but a cosmetic procedure and therefore should not be allowed.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 09:17 PM
2

See my response below to AngryData.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 09:14 PM
8

The fact that you think you need to have "memories" for there to be long-lasting consequences just shows how uninformed you are on the subject of childhood trauma. Even during the period of childhood amnesia, traumatic events have the capability of producing permanent changes in brain structure and hormonal response. Fitzgerald M, Anand KJS. Developmental neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of pain. In: Schechter NL, Berde CB, Yaster M, eds. Pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Baltimore: Wi…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 09:14 PM
6

This should be posted to r/WTF: Yeah, but I wouldn't let him run around with skin hanging off his winer and is cleaner. The skin is attached, not hanging off, which requires them to tear it off the after making the initial incision. Since this was a conversation you participated in, would you mind if I cross-posted this to r/YouthRights, or you could? It's just a shame that children born to such ignorant parents are forced to undergo cosmetic surgery in infancy.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 07:57 PM
13

Infections can be cured with antibiotics and to immediately jump to surgery goes against the medical norm of choosing the least invasive therapy first. If you honestly believe there is no associated long-lasting psychological effects of infant circumcision, I recommend you familiarize yourself with the existing literature.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 07:53 PM
8

For many younger participants of the so-called suffragette school, this was their first real experience of feminism. Birkenshaw signed up because of "a collection of things that have made me go, 'This isn't right!'" One of those things, she said, was walking down the street in "funky dresses and funky tights" and *fearing male comments*, or worse. "I don't like the fact that as a woman I have to feel scared," she said.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 09:20 PM
2

Where did anyone say anything about: feminism being an 'organization?' the organization being linked to some mythical creature? oppression? There is ample evidence of NOW and other feminist organizations fighting against legislation proposed by Fathers and Families.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 04:37 PM
7

This one had plenty of free time, even time enough to write a book. Terry Hekker, a divorcee who is now in her sixties, was a traditional housewife during the '70s and '80s. She wrote a book, "Ever Since Adam and Eve" at the end of the 1970s extolling the virtues of staying home and raising the kids.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 09:03 PM
3

This is one of those strange bedfellows kind of thing. The LGBT community is traditionally feminist and Fathers and Families is definitely one of our organizations.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 08:56 PM
3

You forgot big government loving, tax dollar wasting: When I was 22, right out of college, I worked at the New York City Welfare Department, in a cavernous room filled with rows of wooden desks with linoleum tops. Michael, a charismatic poet, sat at the next desk....I hated the job and spent my days flirting with Michael.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 08:51 PM
3

That can be said to be attributed to religious/ethnic issues rather than sex ones.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 07:53 PM
5

Almost equal, men are conscripted for three years while women for only two, and there are some other glaring areas, but yes they are, as a whole, more equal in treatment than many western countries.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 07:40 PM
1

As someone who has a neck beard and is an MRA, I take double offense.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 01:46 PM
4

Thanks for such a well outlined post. I'll be saving the thread for quick reference.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 11:32 PM
4

But remember, this only applies to women.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 11:27 PM
1

I'm currently taking "Issues In Human Diversity" to fulfill a requirement, though my focus is medicine. Be prepared for an "academic" charade. It really is like a reeducation camp. I knew I was in trouble when in the first class we had to self disclose loads of personal information, including our incomes, family history, sexual orientation, etc.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 11:07 PM
1

I'm sure you've been on Reddit long enough to learn that only us MRAs don't get laid. It's why we're so "bitter."
/r/MensRights11/08/11 11:07 AM
24

These comments are nuts. Thinking back to when I used to do that sex stuff with dudes (it’s been a glorious 20 years now – YAY I’m gonna throw me a party!), I recall that, even when it was a dude I liked a lot, a fine-looking dude, a kind, fun, respectful, feministy dude; even when it was a dude I loved; even when I was feeling lusty and frisky and horny; even when the experience was delightful and orgasmic, even when it was full of warm-fuzzies and fireworks; when I had sex I always felt, every…
/r/MensRights11/08/11 10:57 AM
1

Pretending that every thread they create isn't an invasion thread. Oh the irony.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 10:48 AM
13

I've noticed a lot recently how r/MensRights is preemptively attacked in various threads, even where sex/gender isn't being discussed. Shaming is a common tactic as displayed in that message: ITT will be a bunch of butthurt mensrights neckbeards... I've also often seen many instances where we are said to be lonely and undersexed, which is where our "bitterness" supposedly stems from. For all the talk of how hateful we are, I've seen more vitriol coming from our opponents than from anywhere in th…
/r/MensRights10/08/11 11:46 PM
38

I can picture the real movers of TED, the scientists, sitting there trying to fight off aneurysms from having to listen to this drivel
/r/MensRights07/08/11 05:57 PM
10

I met ZetaMale on Antimisandry before he started his blog. I was excited when he started it but soon found out that he would be taking a "liberal" approach instead of an apolitical one. I bear him no ill will but as a libertarian myself I see the state as the ultimate oppressive force and believe dismantling it should be a priority for anyone concerned with issues of equality and freedom.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 01:03 AM
3

Which committee was in charge of the fact finding for Finding 1? They can't just say "Congress finds the following" without having actually researched the issue. None of our countries medical organizations make such bold statements about circumcision, especially the dated part about "overall improved hygiene" so where exactly are their findings coming from?
/r/MensRights06/08/11 03:00 PM
34

“I hate that I did it,” Rankin testified of the relationship. “I hate that I didn’t have control.” I thought all women were strong and independent. Oh that's right, only when it serves them. If she wasn't in control of herself who was? In asking for leniency, Rankin said her ex-husband treated her as a sex object. Of course, behind every woman's crime is a man who is really at fault. It's ironic she asks for leniency for (supposedly) being treated like a sex object when the crime she's facing is…
/r/MensRights05/08/11 09:16 PM
5

An oldy but a goodie: Testimony of Michael Tanner Director of Health and Welfare Studies Cato Institute before the Subcommittee on Youth Violence Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate Relationship Between the Welfare State and Crime
/r/MensRights04/08/11 11:07 AM
1

Well I bet more people will start using proxies and in the process of doing so will be introduced to the deep web that is filled with brave people who are strongly opposed to governmental invasion of privacy, such as what this bill allows. Even if you're not doing anything sketchy, protecting your personal information should be a priority. There is plenty of security related software and even (free) operating systems).
/r/MensRights04/08/11 11:04 AM
13

Ingeborg Rakete-Dombek, chairwoman of the family law working group in the German Bar Association, said the decision means that parents who want more than three years of child support will have to prove their child has a psychological need for the parent to take care of him or her. I foresee Germany will soon rank number one in the world for children diagnosed with psychiatric disorders.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 07:29 PM
8

Screw that. "Dr." Phil has made it abundantly clear where he stands on male victims of DV and it sure as hell isn't with them (us). I urge you all to continue boycotting everything this quack is involved with.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 10:19 PM
4

I guess that means there aren't any female police batterers (feminist logic).
/r/MensRights02/08/11 11:29 AM
0

This needs to be posted to reddit.com to get the word out to as many people as possible.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 02:08 AM
5

I just had to include this comment for the libertarians among us. Original from article: As for who is picking up the extra cost, White House advisors say they don't believe the changes will impact premiums -- but ultimately, that decision will be made by insurance companies. And from a commenter: "As for who is picking up the extra cost, White House advisors say they don't believe the changes will impact premiums because they don't understand how insurance works -- but ultimately, that decision…
/r/MensRights01/08/11 11:24 PM
5

But the point of the article is that all private insurance companies now have to provide those services without copay.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 11:22 PM
1

You could have stayed on Reddit to find that out: http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/j4qud/iama_female_college_student_who_has_sex_for_money/
/r/MensRights01/08/11 09:04 PM
1

You could have stayed on Reddit to find that out: http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/j4qud/iama_female_college_student_who_has_sex_for_money/
/r/MensRights01/08/11 09:03 PM
2

And of course someone comes and tries to compare MRAs posting a story about and discussing the problem of of domestic violence against men to white supremacists and says we're just a bunch of whiny conspiracy theorists. http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/j5qh5/male_victim_of_domestic_violence_gets_over_7000/c29f6wk?context=3
/r/MensRights01/08/11 08:18 PM
1

I think you mean most use a suctioning device while some (a minority) use their mouths.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 11:52 PM
1

No, no I didn't.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 09:25 PM
3

Yeah, this isn't me just trying to rabble-rouse because a feminist started a board. I've submitted a few things there and even got a message from the reddit telling me I've been made an "approved submitter," though I'm not really sure what that means. I just dislike how feminism has expanded to mean everything under the sun is a feminist issue. They've co-opted so many issues and I just don't want to see that happen to the youths rights issues.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 09:23 PM
3

Another Jew here and I just want to say this can't be stressed enough. The removal of the ballot initiative in California would be a good place to start. It means a judge has ruled that circumcision is a medical procedure. As such, it means that any unlicensed person performing it is practicing medicine without a license. Look at it this way, if I put out an ad that I was performing circumcisions I would quickly be charged with practicing medicine without a license, even if I had been formally t…
/r/MensRights30/07/11 09:07 PM
0

Part of your prediction came true before this thread was even created. See here for an example of option C.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 07:15 PM
1

There is already r/YouthRights of which I am a member. I posted this issue in all the threads about r/KidsRights. Depending on the response to those posts we will see if this new subreddit is genuinely interested in the rights of children or just another attempt by the mods to expand their power into other topics.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 07:13 PM
1

Haven't some cases, like differences in car insurance prices for men and women, been successfully won in the EU Court of Human Rights. The case should be taken there.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 04:09 PM
3

The article just shames the guy. What happens when a 19 year old superstar footballer weds a 22 year old TV actress and makes her move to Italy? Makes her? How did he make her? Did he hold a gun to her head. How is this woman who is already older than him and, according to hegemonic consensus, is more mature by merit of being a woman written off as having absolutely no control in the direction she chooses to take her life?
/r/MensRights28/07/11 11:40 AM
8

"The idea we would put doctors in jail for performing a procedure with known health benefits that parents request for their children is outrageous," she said. What a straw man. That's not what the ballot measure said at all: The only exception would have been "a clear, compelling and immediate medical need." And also, if it's strictly a medical procedure, why aren't Rabbis who perform it arrested for practicing medicine without a license?
/r/MensRights28/07/11 11:32 AM
6

Maybe now that a woman is affected by a false accusation the issue will be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 10:11 AM
1

I'm not sure if this has ever been tried before, though it probably has given the wackiness of the legal system. I found this part interesting: Both Rittgers [the woman's lawyers] said they need videotaped interviews with the boys Schuler is alleged to have had sex with, for their expert to declare her incompetent. Peeler [the judge] was a bit surprised during the hearing by the assertion. “I can’t imagine why an expert who is trying to determine whether or not an individual suffers from a serio…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 11:53 PM
1

So the dilemma is to upvote the thread because of the reasonable arguments made within or downvote because of the misleading title...Hmm.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 07:57 PM
4

Manwomanmyth puts out some excellent videos. While there are many MRA video bloggers who have earned my respect, none can compare, in terms of quality and scope of issues covered, to the people behind Manwomanmyth.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 07:43 PM
2

Thanks for the links. Now I'm going to have to see if anyone recorded or transcribed the symposium itself so I can check out the presentation.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 05:49 PM
2

I'm somewhat familiar with MKULTRA but this is the first time I've heard anything about infant circumcision being part of it. Were you joking or are you serious, and if it's the latter could you provide links?
/r/MensRights23/07/11 04:16 PM
4

Because those people have issues with their gender identity, they are not having their sex changed to gain privilege. That would be like asking: "If whites really are the beneficiaries of so many privileges and blacks discriminated against so badly, why are so many whites obsessed with tanning and so few blacks get their skin lightened?" Totally different things going on.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 02:01 PM
0

What a garbage article. The author uses some really faulty reasoning. She kept bringing up conservative groups and using their views to try to paint father's rights as something they are not. Misogynistic language was brought up, but no examples were given.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 01:50 PM
1

That's why statistics on intimate partner homicide are so unreliable. The methods by which men and women murder their partners are totally different. While men take direct action making for concrete numbers, women often employ others making them either listed as stranger homicide, even when it is found out the killers were hired.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 06:50 PM
2

Yep, just got the message and was a little confused for a second as to why I was getting banned from somewhere I never posted. It's all so clear now though.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:08 PM
2

The members of r/feminism sure have a weird concept of equality. They think it means one system for them (and their allies) and one for us. There're some pretty big differences in the implications between what happened here and the same behavior amongst homosexuals or women discussing men (or any other group)--as the last comment (as of this moment) points out.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 12:56 PM
3

As did I, because the last line came directly from one of the comments. It really astounds me how many ppl there are here debating the sexism of the comment Charles overheard. A woman, writing on a feminist site SAYS its sexist. I’m so tired of folks arguing and debating and philosophizing, rather than shutting the fuck up and listening to those who actually have these EXPERIENCES. Talking about all the great ideas and perspectives you have about oppression (be it racist, sexist, classist, etc) …
/r/MensRights20/07/11 12:48 PM
2

Well it would be very time consuming to read each study to find their specific flaws, but you've already recognised some of the problems that characterize this sort of research. Definitions count and the way questions are worded, often deliberately, exempt men from being victims. If you see that many studies on domestic violence posted in one place and none of them list Murray Straus as an author, you can be sure they were cherry picked since he is probably the most published author on the subje…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 02:23 AM
7

For anyone who wants to watch the CBS clip without having to sit through the whole episode and all its drivel (Bernard only linked to the full episode without telling us when the segment began), you can view it in another response. I've linked to the time it starts, at 4:45, though just to give the poster his due you can rewind to watch the whole clip. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wP4VeMJp9pE&feature=watch_response#t=4m45s
/r/MensRights16/07/11 01:42 PM
3

You actually believe there was any semblance of sanity, even partial sanity, in that post? When the premier feminist magazine starts instructing women that a deficit is good, and a larger deficit better, it shouldn't be posted to a men's forum? Maybe you missed this: The mantra that “the budget must be balanced” is a throwback to the 19th century, originating from the same outmoded economic thinking that justifies women’s lower wages. It seems like th outmoded economic thinking she's referring t…
/r/MensRights16/07/11 12:49 AM
1

I agree and I wasn't arguing for the policy of releasing names of people that have only been accused but not convicted, I just find it strange how some sources continue to protect the name of accusers even after the case has been found to have no merit.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 12:41 AM
13

The end was the best part, but, in my opinion, for reasons other that the "preference" issue that has already pointed out. He said a "woman's nation" and she said she hoped so...that is the key to the end. If feminism is about equality, no feminist should ever express a desire for a female nation any more than a male one. She showed right there that feminism, for many women, is about female supremacy. It's not a nation of equals she wants, but a female run nation.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 11:26 PM
5

Why is it that the accuser's name is not included in the FIRE story? More importantly, why is her name blacked out in the police report? It is customary, for better or worse, to withhold the names of victims of rape, but the police believe she made up the account which means she is not a victim deserving of having her name protected. She is now the defendant in a criminal case so why is her name still being protected after Caleb's has been dragged through the mud?
/r/MensRights15/07/11 09:36 PM
2

This is the type of stuff we need...Simple and clear format, fully sourced, and highly informative.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 04:07 PM
1

I'm a mother coming into a very male-oriented business,"..."I'm not getting any support..." Now wait a minute....I thought being a mother was the hardest job in the world, though I've also heard that being a teacher which she also is, so every other job, including this one, should be a walk in the park.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 03:23 PM
9

In my state, Ohio, you can't even get a driver's license without registering. If you haven't previously registered, no worries...you can do it there.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 12:30 AM
3

What a stark contrast. It's really like night and day. It really takes a politician to excel to such insane levels of hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 10:09 AM
1

That illustration is great.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 02:34 AM
5

Amnesty International has come out with reports against the US "justice" system, specifically sexual abuse in prisons. The problem with this tactic, that I see, is that they prefer to focus on systems as a whole instead of individual cases. They will condemn cases that exemplify abuses, but they aren't likely to give too much focus to the US. They are an organization with political ties like any other and there are documented instances of them ignoring issues that don't fit the party line. It wo…
/r/MensRights07/07/11 10:17 AM
3

That's the difference between history (objective) and herstory (subjective).
/r/MensRights07/07/11 10:11 AM
30

It bothers me too, though as a man. I suppose you could say it, rightfully, bothers us as humans. Chomsky, though not speaking about men specifically, explained how the media creates uses language to create worthy and unworthy victims. There are a few great videos that discuss the topic you might want to check out. Men Don't Exist Men are Disposable 1/4 Men are Disposable 2/4 Men are Disposable 3/4 Men are Disposable 4/4
/r/MensRights07/07/11 10:06 AM
5

I'm confused because the article doesn't go into much detail, are the felony child endangerment charges the result of possessing marijuana in a residence where minors live? If so, that is fucked.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 12:29 AM
77

So true. Very applicable to the recent Potential Elevator Rapist Incident that Richard Dawkins set out to condemn.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 10:00 PM
1

I'll have to respectfully disagree. It's really not as simple as you make it seem. The legality of the practice is most influenced by a combination of ignorance of people of what the procedure really entails and its history, that out medical organizations make neutral statements, the profits made by hospitals (which is thousands of dollars compared to maybe $250 average for a mohel), and a somewhat Puritanical belief in absolute parental rights in this country.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 01:29 PM
1

The majority of circumcisions that take place are done by non Jews, so why are focusing on this instead of the larger issue of why people in the absence of religious decree are subjecting their sons to the procedure?
/r/MensRights02/07/11 04:13 AM
10

We’re also talking about a woman who is an immigrant, who is of color, who is poor... Poor people don't own 5 cell phones or have $100,000 dollars worth of deposits into their bank account. The article complains about characterizations about the woman's character implying she is not worthy of belief or sympathy but then asserts another set of characteristics implying she is especially worthy of those things.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 07:32 PM
1

Also in Ohio and am doing clinical rotations in the ER. Every person that comes in is asked, along with many other things, if they "feel safe at home." That phrase is supposed to cover abuse between partners and abuse/neglect of the elderly. When people are confused we clarify. Never heard someone answer yes, which is weird considering feminists claim like a quarter of women in the ER are there because they were abused.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 10:03 AM
3

Kind of like how even after the sex was proven consensual in the Hofstra case the guys were still attacked because even though the act was illegal, it was 'immoral' so no one was supposed to feel sorry for them for what they went through as a result of a false accusation.
/r/MensRights29/06/11 09:19 AM
3

No, it was the final straw for her to compare a boss to a mass murderer after ongoing issues of not performing adequately on the job.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 12:00 PM
3

You think it's strange that a movie industry makes movies about an historical figure but people don't like being compared to a mass murderer? Who said anything about blacklisted for life. Spielberg doesn't own Hollywood. No one even knew who Fox was before Transformers. She wanted to be an ungrateful brat and shit talk a man who helped her make millions in public and now people are mad she was called on her bullshit?
/r/MensRights28/06/11 11:59 AM
2

Man. I remember seeing a show where they set up women and men with special headgear that tracked their eye movements while in a bar and found similar results. I can't for the life of me remember the name of the program though.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 01:21 AM
5

I had a feeling that an African nation would be the first to denounce the practice instead of taking a neutral position as many other countries' medical associations have. Many of the crusaders against female genital cutting in Africa are adamantly opposed to any genital cutting. This is great news and may get some of the people in the West who deny the similarities between female and male genital cutting to reconsider their positions.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 09:21 AM
5

I've always been interested in legal battles concerning parents with differing ideas on circumcising their child. It would be great if you would start a thread sharing the particulars of your story, if you're comfortable sharing that is.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 09:16 PM
6

If this woman had been given a bail amount appropriate for attacking someone with a knife, she would not have been free to launch this recent attack. I'm only guessing the bail was low by the look of the house which would lead me to believe she doesn't have the funds to post a large bail.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 12:10 PM
2

There was the study that came out not long ago, though it was a simple poll, that found something like 50% of women said they would date an unemployed man compared to 90% of men who would date an unemployed woman.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 02:55 PM
6

Dr. Eugene Schoenfeld, a psychiatrist with 47 years of experience, is a firm believer that young boys are not harmed in the same way by adult relationships as young girls. If a psychiatrist ever tried to testify to the opposite in court, there would be a huge public outcry. NOW would call for him to be forced out of his professional organizations, and they would probably get their wish.
/r/MensRights22/06/11 09:38 AM
3

I'm surprised that the business aspect of the procedure has not yet made it into this circumcision debate. Sources say that 80% of American males are currently circumcised (as compared to 30% worldwide). While a portion of circumcisions are performed outside the hospital setting, for example by mohels who perform the ritual for some people of Jewish faith, couldn't a ban on a procedure as widespread as this one have a significant impact on the business of birth? Wow. Priorities much? So boys nee…
/r/MensRights17/06/11 02:46 PM
2

You have to compare like with like, or in this instance state with state. There are a few women on the site listen who were tried in Alabama, as was the man. Even with worse crimes they received substancially shorter sentences.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 11:40 PM
4

.....when rape defendants are convicted they're often treated with respect by fellow prisoners, and when they get out of jail they're out of jail and that's usually that. In what alternate dimension does this happen? Rapists are considered scum in prison. In my state they decided to house those convicted of sex offenses in their own prison because of the violence directed against them from the general prison population.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 11:03 PM
3

It was even done recently enough that audio recording existed. Have a listen: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slhhg8sI6Ds
/r/MensRights14/06/11 07:14 PM
2

Thanks for posting. I was in the car on the way to school when it started and was going to put the word out once here but you beat me to it. It didn't take long for an e-mail and then a call about false rape accusations and the presumption of innocence. I'll have to listen to the rest of the program online after getting out of class.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 07:03 PM
7

In my state, Ohio, you will be denied a driver's license if you failed to register. For anyone that didn't previously, no problem, they give you the option to register at the DMV.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 08:07 PM
3

Women were significantly more likely to abort if they reported that the father... “does not support the mother’s way of raising the child.” Here we have another example of female selfishness being twisted agaisnt men. So if a father believes in a different parenting model, which may even be a superior one, the woman aborts because no one should question how a Mama Bear raises its cubs and then researchers blame the abortion on the man.
/r/MensRights13/06/11 12:48 PM
3

So you just copied and pasted a list of unsourced medical claims from a pro-circumcision site, all of which can be refuted, and expect us to change our minds. 1. Doctors should use aseptic technique. 2. The incidence of penile cancer is about 1 in 100,00, not 1 in 1000. Seems like the site you copied from is trying to distort the information. 3. There is now a vaccine for HPV. 4. The US has the highest rate of infant circumcision of all Western industrialized countries, aside from Israel, but ha…
/r/MensRights12/06/11 09:47 PM
9

I'm a Jew who was mutilated as an infant and I fucking care.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 01:21 AM
20

He's referring to the mothers liking their husbands' penises. Imagine, though, the outrage if someone who performed female genital cutting asked the husbands of the cut women if they were happy with the results and used that as justification for continuing the practice. There would certainly be outrage.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 11:27 AM
4

The second picture is of a man robbing a woman. How is that in any way related to her assault and the topic of the article, women's violence against men?
/r/MensRights04/06/11 03:12 PM
12

The mother not wishing to press charges is irrelivant in our legal system. The state brings criminal charges, not citizens. If I, an adult, sell a joint to another adult I am charged with violating a law, regardless of the fact there is no victim. In real crimes, victims become witnesses for the state. That's why all criminal cases read "State of (whatever state it may be) vs. Defendant. We also are all familiar with "no frop" domestic violence laws, where even without the cooperation of the vic…
/r/MensRights04/06/11 12:41 AM
23

What really kills me is how Reform Jews seem so interested in Jewish laws, traditions, and customs only in regard to circumcision. I wonder if her two divorces were in line with Jewish law. Somehow I doubt it. They will make all types of excuses about why they don't keep kosher or keep the Sabbath but with circumcision they are all of a sudden Torah scholars deeply concerned with following the tenants of their faith. P.S. I am a Jewish male who opposes infant circumcision.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 05:02 PM
2

You're correct. Feminism creates a false dichotomy where you either identify yourself as a feminist or you are against basic egalitarian principles that predated any feminist movement (voting, equal rights, etc). The vast majority of women identify as feminists despite not really being interested in true equality (being drafted, paying on dates, etc.). It's actually a rather meaningless label.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 01:31 PM
11

"The winning design represented a guy’s checklist of things to plan including getting a room, making dinner reservations, ordering flowers and getting permission." Even at such a young age they see guys as walking ATMs.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 04:40 AM
2

Could someone who knows about adding to Wiki articles include something from this story? http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Dad-Teen-Son-Was-Offered-Sex-Drugs-on-Plane-98298069.html Basically, when a woman made sexual advances against a teenage boy on a flight the staff did nothing. That was just the first link when I searched the story so there's sure to be other outlets who covered it, possibly ones that include more detailed information. I know it's a different airline than the ones with th…
/r/MensRights15/05/11 01:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter