TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

paracog Archive

View 17 posts and 877 comments by paracog on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
251

Social Issuesparacog/r/MensRights04/12/17 12:52 AM
75

Edu./Occu.paracog/r/MensRights28/10/17 02:11 AM
70

Social Issuesparacog/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:16 PM
29

paracog/r/MGTOW05/08/15 05:52 PM
18

paracog/r/MGTOW05/03/15 02:08 AM
15

paracog/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:16 AM
13

paracog/r/MGTOW15/11/18 03:29 AM
12

paracog/r/MGTOW23/05/14 12:20 AM
8

Social Issuesparacog/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:48 AM
5

paracog/r/MensRights04/08/15 07:17 PM
4

paracog/r/MGTOW15/02/15 08:05 PM
1

paracog/r/MGTOW04/03/15 01:08 AM
1

paracog/r/MGTOW27/02/15 08:09 PM
0

paracog/r/MensRights26/05/13 10:18 PM
0

paracog/r/MGTOW26/05/14 09:29 PM
0

paracog/r/MensRights07/05/13 12:15 AM
0

paracog/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:07 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Yeah, I filtered the shit out of that subreddit and a few others for this horse shit.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 12:38 PM
5

Fork cough, shillbot.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 09:08 AM
1

I got banned from that sub for a mildly porn subreddit I find amusing. They've got some hair trigger ban rules going on.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 09:06 AM
1

It's time for Western men to learn the power of Yin. When anything we do actively to promote ourselves is dismissed as patriarchal or abusive, or toxic, then the alternative is to not engage, to build comfort and safety into our lives and relationships, and eventually it will become evident to most people the ways in which women abuse power, something they've only had the opportunity to do on a public scale for a few years. Men have sacrificed and built and done without leisure or comfort for ce…
/r/MensRights15/06/24 09:38 AM
5

It was always a con, duping men into sacrificing their health and their bodies to be counted as masculine and worthy of honor. As in so many other areas of life now, the pretty covers have been pulled off the steaming piles of bullshit. The West has always been hopeless dealing with Yin energy, with "I prefer not to," or "I am not going to get in shape to be a sacrifice." Why we lost in Viet Nam, and in Afganistan. Only certain things can be done with overwhelming force. Life is push and pull, g…
/r/MensRights15/06/24 08:43 AM
25

Women make over 80% of the consumer purchase decisions in the U.S.. Husbands in the past had more authority, and would be the ones to tighten the purse strings. The hapless dad is a deliberate debasing of the vote of the person in the family most likely to be resistant to spending money. Who in the family is the hardest to buy for? It's dad. So anything that's not car, sports, or beer related is likely to show the dad as clueless and the mom and kids as the smart ones. - edited a lil bit
/r/MensRights12/01/24 03:47 PM
10

It has occurred to me that if young women could have the experience of the sexual drive of a healthy young male for say, one month, they would understand that there is no rape culture, but that culture is why there isn't a hell of a lot more rape. Chaperones would be in high demand. The breathtaking self-centeredness of Western women, who are pandered to endlessly, keeps them from understanding that their own sex drive, which is slow to kindle and relationship and situation based, is not that of…
/r/MensRights22/12/23 03:19 PM
1

Male pattern badness.
/r/MensRights08/12/23 10:36 PM
1

If a man isn't likely to earn enough to support a wife and family, he's gonna maybe get dates, but not mates.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 01:03 AM
4

It's not the drink itself that gets teased, it's the pea-brained conformity. That's worth poking fun at no matter which sex is doing it. This kind of well-poisoning article is guaranteed to get clicks from unhappy women.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 04:52 PM
3

I love checking out Reductress from time to time. So refreshing to see a women's site largely poking fun at women.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 04:51 PM
2

Specious argument as well, since women do the great majority of consumer purchasing.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 04:49 PM
2

TV is always made for the advertisers, and women are the apex consumers. So the perennial depiction of men as fools, childish, or monsters.
/r/MensRights23/01/23 04:10 PM
1

If feminism is viewed as a demi-religion--for which a good case can be made--then Patriarchy fits in the niche Christianity has assigned for Satan.
/r/MensRights23/01/23 03:46 PM
3

It's a yin and yang issue in my view. Women have been enabled to exercise assertive power pretty much unchecked, while men attempting to meet it with the same are labeled abusive. To balance things out--and this is one of the few things Ayn Rand got right with "Atlas Shrugged"-- men need to retreat until the absence of their assertiveness begins to be felt and missed. This is happening, as wealth is confiscated from average people, birthrates are going down, women are more miserable than in prev…
/r/MensRights23/01/23 03:38 PM
1

Seems fair, that if women are allowed in the workforce, men should be able to take off the damn harness and have some ease for the first time.
/r/MensRights23/01/23 02:20 PM
2

I did that search for husband yelling and the link for the Domestic Violence Network was the top one.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 03:01 PM
4

Some, like Don John in "Much Ado About Nothing" would rather be a "plain dealing villain" than to suck up to those who hate them. Less of a hit to the ego to be seen as an asshole than as a reject loser.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 08:22 PM
93

I view the sheer amount of scorn and derision heaped on incels as going a long way towards proving their case.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:08 AM
10

Horrors. When I used to work for the Fleet Post Office, we had a bar set up inside one of the trucks behind a wall of bags.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/22 12:51 AM
14

Can't be princess without some scorned suitors.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/22 07:35 AM
2

This definition making an entertainment that is insulting and hostile to men and then calling men misogynists for not liking it. I really wanted to like She-Hulk, I like Hulk movies in general. But the woman does not like men and I can't be interested.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:14 PM
2

If you disempower good men, that doesn't lead to empowered women; it leads to powerful bad men. Such as we see everywhere. Progressives have taught their men to be passive and are paying the price.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:16 PM
1

They make these, the market gives them accurate feedback, they ignore it, call it misogyny, and make more. Just like religious dogmatists.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:59 AM
5

Heh, the only character that gets to dis her is the robot.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:49 AM
-1

It's just straight up pandering, based on the perception, often well-earned, that women don't like being portrayed in unflattering scenarios like the awkward training montages that are usual with males coming into their powers or roles. And when this omission is boring to men, who like the idea of training and getting better, it's called misogyny. But nah, it's pandering and lazy.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:47 AM
2

Not implying any slight or minimizing the issues that men have, which are also unfair and largely invisible. Karen Straughan has done a series of masterful video essays on the issues men face and why society is inclined to ignore their needs unless they are rich, famous, or in some way dominant. As you say, men who are not in some way prominent are dismissed as cannon fodder, red shirts, clone troopers, to be ignored and used without mercy or compassion. And now, after having alienated men for s…
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 06:47 AM
-2

The crucial difference here is that women now have the freedom to choose this personally, instead of having it forced on them by culture.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 12:15 AM
2

People saying this will set back the cause of abused women are like the churches rationalizing that prosecution of abusive priests will set back the good works of the church.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 04:41 AM
56

It's not like she isn't getting a chance to say her piece. Nobody is silencing her. In fact that's her liability. They are listening to her.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 07:56 AM
18

They say listening, but they mean blindly supporting.
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/22 10:27 PM
11

Women make 85% of consumer purchases and seem to have no limit on pandering.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 01:30 PM
1

I see this a lot, the associating of a mild offence with other much more extreme ones. Example Woody Allen in the same sentence as Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 02:48 AM
9

Also, if the soldiers came to your town---uh, well, I guess you'd be safe.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/21 05:32 AM
22

Not victim blame; victimplication.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/21 03:10 PM
1

College is shit value for money and time expended. It's ripe for disruption and men will do the disrupting, as always. The quality of teaching available cheaply or free online outstrips the current undergrad experience at most colleges by quite a bit. Nobody needs to stop their life for 4 or more years to be near to a library any more. Once the social connection and legitimization elements get figured out, maybe we can just use campuses to house the homeless.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 01:13 PM
1

Education is due for a huge disruption, since the model is beyond antiquated and the expense no where near worth the value. And men are going to do the innovating, as they always do.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 03:29 AM
1

If I had a son coming of age, I would tell him to get his sperm frozen, get it stored where it can't be extradited, then get a vasectomy. And not marry.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 02:56 AM
1

They know she did it. They're celebrating letting her get away with it. It's just so sassy!
/r/MensRights23/02/21 05:40 PM
4

I kind of view much of feminism as a social construct designed to reflect women in the most flattering light possible in any situation. This would of course draw in a high percentage of narcissists who will defend feminism as an extension of their ego structure.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 05:35 PM
1

She'll be saying it a lot.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 08:00 PM
102

It came to me that for a lot of her fans, her abusiveness, and getting away with it, is a positive thing, a you-go-girl gangster move.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/20 12:09 PM
3

Helps to be sober.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/20 05:11 PM
1

Justice is coming for Amber. It's called "hitting 35 with no talent."
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/20 03:57 PM
1

Then you're pointing with your hand not just a finger.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/20 07:19 AM
4

Human hand is designed so that when you point a finger, three point back at you. Good design.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/20 02:28 AM
1

Next girl over: "Jeez, I can't even smile at a guy without him coming on to me!!"
/r/seduction13/09/20 01:56 AM
14

The videos of Karen Straughan have a lot of great insights...she's pretty anti-feminist, though, but she's smart and logical and thoughtful. https://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat
/r/MensRights22/08/20 10:57 PM
33

A fair percentage of women don't have anything like an accurate sense of the impact of their words. They genuinely believe they are so powerless that their words can't hurt, and have no governor on them. They are genuinely startled when people take them seriously. In this way, they create the misogyny they complain about.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 08:05 AM
3

I'm a 73 year old male, and I'm pretty sure about 60-75% of women could kick my ass at this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 11:49 PM
1

I read an article recently to this effect, and buried in the middle of the text was this sentence: "Of course men die much more often." Then on to the burdens women face...
/r/MensRights12/07/20 07:28 PM
1

Too many women running around with post-secondary degrees and the emotional maturity of 5th graders.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 07:21 PM
2

Talking bout inner beauty, but if her nose was 1/4 inch different in any way, there would be some other woman in that photo.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 06:22 PM
2

"Believe All Women" contains the hateful corollary, "Don't Believe Men."
/r/MensRights14/05/20 09:58 AM
1

This provides an opening for other studios to go up against the Disney conglomerate, because the market for good male-oriented movies, particularly action and sci-fi, in the U.S., and globally, is as strong as ever.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 09:42 AM
7

Incredible how many people have had to come to his defense for him to even get the basic presumption of innocence supposedly accorded to all. "Believe Women!" contains the corollary, "Never Believe Men.!"
/r/MensRights14/05/20 09:38 AM
0

They're in a tough spot, because if they fire her, they will earn the ire of feminists, who do not forget, don't let up, and loudly condemn. Women are Disney's cashflow, the ones that bring their daughters to the stores and who buy all the movies.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 09:33 AM
15

It's analogous to a religious school accepting only sources from that religion.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 05:25 PM
1

I wonder if porn stars get how seldom we watch that first part where they're on the couch chatting and batting their eyes?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/20 11:05 AM
4

As with most things these days, social media just intensifies the problem. For much of history, women were overly protected, and if there was a strange man around, it was unusual, and threatening. Now women can go anywhere, but the hypervigilance remains a strong impulse. As does the automatic assumption that women are safer, even though they are more likely to physically abuse children than men, mostly because they are around them more. Certainly our society is already suffering the consequence…
/r/MensRights25/02/20 02:37 AM
10

The attention is a bonus, and also feeling like a princess with a suitor to reject.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/20 01:30 AM
1

It's interesting that "metoo" can be seen as acknowledgement of shared guilt.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 04:04 AM
1

They gotta start somewhere, though. C'mon... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nM9sOfFKnFA
/r/PussyPassDenied06/02/20 05:03 AM
2

Some of the most eloquent voices in the conversation about men's rights are from wise and fair women, and in some cases they are able to more forthrightly state the case than men will, given that men are raised not to complain. I'm thinking of women such as Christina Hoff Sommers, Karen Straughan, Dr. Helen Smith, Cassie Jaye, and others. Their voices are harder to dismiss than male men's rights leaders.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 09:49 PM
8

Feminists scorn men as being immature, but what they are displaying is obviously a pre-adolescent emotional response to men, i.e. boys are icky, girls are good and never to blame.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 08:27 PM
5

Interesting to see how this plays out. Organizations that do this kind of ham-fisted discrimination usually end up losing support/customers/money.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 08:25 PM
3

Women do over 80% of consumer shopping, and are famously susceptible to flattery. No brainer.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 08:23 PM
4

The risk feminists take when they treat men as the enemy is that they may eventually be proven right.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 08:22 PM
6

Prolapse?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/19 03:27 PM
2

Wise men have understood the chains of being a husband and father for centuries, and have responded by withdrawing from economic and political life, instead living close to nature and usually in beautiful buildings. Taking a personal vow of poverty removed them from the sights of women looking for a plow horse.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 08:18 PM
1

Imagine male porn stars complaining that women make so much more money than they do. ;-)
/r/MensRights12/07/19 09:03 AM
1

Any excitement and interest their victory generated in me for women's soccer just evaporated when they used their moment to complain.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 09:02 AM
1

Just walk that video over to the nearest police station, M8.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 08:33 AM
2

When an accusation can ruin someone's life, using truth as the default mode until proven otherwise is simply unjust. And expensive in eventual lawsuits.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 02:36 PM
0

I can't seriously respond to this, so have this instead ;-) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDBQzcDQiII
/r/MensRights30/05/19 06:54 PM
1

Dumb thing to put out publicly. It's actually not nearly as bad as the things I privately wish on Trump and his facilitators.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 03:09 PM
40

"Always believe women!"
/r/MensRights30/05/19 10:14 AM
4

It just seems to me that a large part of feminism is simply women finding ways to flatter themselves and escape the honor that is due men, in service of selfishness. As they say, "to belittle is to be little."
/r/MensRights29/05/19 11:56 PM
5

People go to festivals hoping to hook up. It's usually up to the man to initiate. If it's unwelcome, the woman can say she's harassed. This is attempted social manipulation by people who have a problem with normal male proceptivity. Tarantino had it down in one sentence: "I reject your hypothesis."
/r/MensRights29/05/19 11:31 PM
1

"The Business of America is Business" "In Business, the customer is always right." Women do 80+% of consumer spending. Any questions?
/r/MensRights29/05/19 11:25 PM
17

Women who say shit like this are, I believe, deeply convinced that their words have no weight in the world. No self worth.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 07:07 PM
7

Feminism draws on centuries of sentimentality for women, who did take it for the team a lot of the time to keep the race going. That reservoir of sentiment will dry up eventually, as people get burned out on endless self-centered demands. My take on this is that, as women have learned to fight, that men need to learn more of a martial art skillfulness, to turn their anger aside and let it defeat them. In fact, this is happening widely already, as men withdraw from feminist centered environments …
/r/MensRights25/05/19 11:08 AM
-1

...or female vanity. How flattering to think a few minutes of unpleasantness on one of your evenings was worth big bucks...
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:41 AM
40

This needs to be a crime.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 02:50 AM
3

Absolute parody of man hating lesbian.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 05:02 PM
18

Most attractive is a slot reserved for women only.
/r/MGTOW25/11/18 07:29 AM
1

Then ask them if that acceptance extends to pro-anna. Watch them freak.
/r/MGTOW20/11/18 10:08 AM
1

It's going to be interesting when business realizes that it will never be enough. Never enough attention, percs, moral witchhunts...as the costs mount.
/r/MGTOW20/11/18 09:30 AM
1

It's kind of the feminist version of right-wingers clumping everyone they don't like as "commies." Lazy and cowardly thinking.
/r/MGTOW20/11/18 09:21 AM
2

News articles mostly refrain from printing the whole quote. Just the "don't work as hard" statement.
/r/MGTOW03/09/18 10:08 AM
1

A woman who I was close friends with through our MA degrees at a state college, with (20 years ago) inexpensive fees, then went on for a PhD in Feminist Studies through a private online college, racking up 100K in debt. Which is now 150K even with her attempts to pay back what she could, because of course she can't get work with that degree. She'll die with that debt. She's not a bad person...she's big hearted and hard working. She was exremely ill-served by people who encouraged her to go for t…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 08:27 PM
20

Ignoring all the men who searched for her for weeks. When your own sexism is the prism you look through at the world.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 12:09 PM
1

Feminists are no doubt exploding with frustration because they want to blame the boy completely and they can't express it in public.
/r/MGTOW27/08/18 03:37 AM
4

It's hilarious watching Rose McGowan, Miss Hell on Wheels, advising everyone to be gentle with Argento because "we don't know all the facts." Chew on that irony, lady.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:58 PM
2

Women want the good paying clean jobs with social status and flattering looks. For the great majority of what actually keeps the lights on, the town safe, food in the markets and gas in the tank, men still do most of it. Women want to have every flattering role available to them in their social walk-in closet, and men are supposed to let them for reasons. Men don't want to be primary childcare givers, for the most part , though it's great that they can be more often now if they want. A good ques…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:10 PM
1

Men fought for unions when it was part of their role as provider for their family. Once the family unit was weakened, men stopped fighting as hard, since we're not conditioned to fight just for ourselves.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 04:04 PM
2

The feminist fantasy is that they can somehow be handed political power while being indifferent to the fortunes of half of the citizenry.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 10:35 PM
6

Yep. The market has systematically invaded all of our social spheres and exploited whatever communal meaning and norms we had until now we are so unmoored and unsure of how we should behave that we take hysterical moral stands against the few things we are still sure are wrong, i.e. pedophilia, rape, and terrorism. Everything else is grey area. #metoo seems to be an effort to regain the sentimental protection that women had which was a compensation for having no political or economic power, sacr…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:33 PM
2

https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/media_ph.php?ModuleId=10007820&MediaId=7400
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:42 PM
2

If women could, for a period of time--say a month--experience a healthy male sex drive, they would understand that culture is in place to prevent rape.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:37 PM
4

On the other hand, given the expense in money and lives this kneejerk sacrificing of prominent men is causing, I think we're continuing burning through the unconscious sentimentality surrounding womanhood that they earned through generations of sacrifice and now no longer merit.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:35 PM
4

If you want to pass out fast, have a drink for each violent act on males in "Wreck-it Ralph."
/r/MensRights29/11/17 06:51 PM
11

Trying to make rules based on people's internal emotional weather is a very expensive fool's errand. Wondering when and where the tipping point will be. Especially since the best people are stepping down, while the worst stay in power.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 06:39 PM
1

As far as the presence of women moderating men's behavior, I think all the recent social science has been muddied beyond hope by feminist dogma. But traditionally, it was seen that frontier towns became less dangerous and rowdy when families moved in, and there is some good science that men live longer and with more healthy habits in marriages. Thinking this over, who knows how much of this is pure myth designed to boost middle class consumer values. I personally found marriage stifling and isol…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 09:07 PM
1

So many dimensions to that discussion. One example: we're a lot healthier and more comfortable and long lived due to technology and science, but...our numbers are threatening the health of the planet...so are the mass slaughters of the 20th century a net bad or good? This brings up the arbitrary quality of bad and good. Women have a moderating effect on men's behavior, which is largely considered to be a good thing, but it could also lead to stagnation. The argument that women are better than me…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 01:13 PM
2

Thank you. I reread what I wrote in case I had inserted something inane in there, but....scratches head
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:34 AM
-8

Well, major religions, philosophies, heroic rescues, philanthropic organizations all from men.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 11:06 PM
-1

Not defending women so much as observing that generally, men are represented on both ends of the spectrum and women are more to the middle. Source: science.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 11:05 PM
-28

Yep, and when men are bad, they're often worse. But not bad enough to condemn all men as feminists try to do with this fact. Edit: frickin' kneejerkers.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 08:07 PM
240

Feminists say this shit, completely ignoring the fact that all of us know lots of women, and that some of them are not good at all.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:09 PM
4

Somehow these women think by having a huge pile-on to disgrace and disempower men through hearsay is a bid for them to be given more political power. Hope not.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:27 PM
3

One of the things that makes feminists uneasy is when their stark disinterest in justice for men is pointed out.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 05:53 AM
3

The jailers return with an altered confession. "Sign this!!"
/r/MensRights11/11/17 05:51 AM
-5

Well, it is a bit easier to feel unconcerned when a conservative who has been trying to take away others' sexual freedoms gets caught with several cocks in their orifices.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 05:43 AM
6

Her: He did something I didn't want. Media: We'll end his career and reputation. Her: Oooh, I feel just like a princess now!
/r/MensRights11/11/17 05:40 AM
2

Well then, perhaps they could tone down the efforts to dishonor them, at least.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 08:22 PM
2

Men pay over 70% of income tax but the vast majority of public spending is on services for women.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 06:03 PM
2

These accusers are going to claim they are being blackballed, but what casting director is going to want to star a woman who has "rape victim" vibes coming off her reputation?
/r/MensRights02/11/17 05:58 AM
3

The old divide and conquer strategy.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 05:55 AM
15

For all the shit men get for being immature, this "boys are icky" residual immaturity in so many women is just as harmful.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 05:51 AM
1

You don't want people to be standing around needing to go in a Taco Bell.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 05:50 AM
11

It's a show, to keep women being useful idiots. They make pliable employees, provide free childcare and elder care, and do most of the retail purchasing. They can be flattered into doing the dumbest shit. On the other hand, men still make most of the rules and do most of the decisions, and men do most of the useful work that keeps the world safe and comfortable for women. At some level women know this and it makes them crazier. Feminism excuses women from honoring men in exchange for inflating w…
/r/MensRights02/11/17 05:48 AM
1

How much financial loss will end up being incurred from this latest wave of moral panic? There's going to be a long term response to this, and I'm betting it won't be empowering to accusers.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 10:12 PM
1

Emma Watson is like a triple lottery winner who goes on tours to teach economics.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 10:07 PM
1

Men get a lot of flak for not being emotionally immature, but isn't the toxic masculinity slander based on an attitude that "boys are icky," a sign of emotional immaturity in women, who somehow have never gotten comfortable with the reciprocity of the male female relationship?
/r/MensRights01/11/17 10:02 PM
3

Also gullible and rich. Think 60% of Tom Hanks' roles.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 09:56 PM
23

With all the Trump disruption, the DNC started to be in danger of some success, and now have to take steps to assure failure.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 09:17 PM
5

Her statement refutes itself. She's lying about rape.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 12:30 PM
11

"The ugly man put his hands on my shoulders and all I got out of it was a 3 picture deal, a fat payday and an Oscar nomination. I feel so used!"
/r/MensRights28/10/17 07:09 AM
14

Almost all gender-related news articles really strain to portray women in the best light possible. The blowback from failing to do so can be fierce, and women are the ones who do most of the retail purchasing. Privately a lot of journalists would admit they feel pushed to appeal to women's vanity if at all possible.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 04:22 AM
3

The buzz comes from getting the attention and the passing feeling of being the good one, the virginal one. Like most of feminist actions, it is a gesture, and nothing will come of it unless it is done by men. Since most of the accusations are not provable, the satisfaction comes from knocking powerful men down a peg. It's malice disguised as outrage.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 04:06 AM
22

Some studies say that women don't mentor women as much as they could. They better step up their game, because male mentoring is gonna dry up, somewhat.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 02:12 AM
2

Yeah, it would be an interesting experiment for men to stay home for a few days, other than all the deaths and destruction from critical services not being manned This sort of sappy horseshit is only possible because the writer is unconsciously certain that men will not abandon the responsibilities that keep us fed, sheltered, healthy and safe.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 01:57 AM
2

I remember my stepfather taking his teeth out and chasing my little female cousins around the house. They screamed and giggled with delight at the imagined peril. I think some women liven up their dull-ass lives by imagining themselves as little heroines facing down mostly illusory threats.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 11:18 PM
2

Men feel strongly, but they are also able to shut down when the situation calls for it, a survival trait inherited from being protectors, and in the case of women like this, very useful still.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 11:16 PM
2

http://www.realsexism.com/
/r/MensRights27/10/17 11:10 PM
1

They say that women in power are reluctant to mentor younger women. They are going to need to change that, because men are going to stop offering mentoring to avoid future risk. Any abuse of power contains seeds of its own backlash, and feminism is not exempt from this.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 11:06 PM
1

As dozens or more valuable and productive men are forced from their positions, the costs will add up, and privately there will be resentment towards these women. And ugly behavior won't go away, it will be driven further into shadow and result in even uglier events.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 01:10 PM
1

If you ignore western history, then you don't understand when you're recapitulating some of its worst aspects, substituting feminism for the church or the totalitarian state.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 01:07 PM
6

Yeah, not a witch. What you are is kin to the little shit girls who got all the people hanged and drowned in Salem.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 10:33 AM
1

So weird how when you say something insulting to a whole gender, you'll get immediate feedback!
/r/MensRights25/10/17 10:53 PM
11

A news item related to this song: "You and I understand the difference between art and reality. However, I don’t think Nakia Hurdle of Stratford, Connecticut does . . . because she took CARRIE UNDERWOOD’S song “Before He Cheats” as a call to action. Nakia was arrested for taking a hammer to her ex-boyfriend’s car in the parking lot of a hotel on New Year’s Day. She also slashed two of his tires. For that brainless move, Nakia was charged with breach of peace and criminal mischief. According to a…
/r/MensRights25/10/17 05:07 PM
7

If your reality is not understandable by others not like you, perhaps it's a fantasy.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 05:03 PM
41

It makes men easier targets for false accusation too. So what's her fucking point.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 07:50 AM
2

Their takeaway was that "no one learned anything?" What was there to be learned was that men don't consider that kind of stuff threatening or harmful, and that the experience of being assaulted happens in the mind and emotions of women. What they really meant was "we're not going to learn or understand anything that conflicts with our preconceived ideas."
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:34 AM
2

And which of the surgical techniques were pioneered by women? I'm waiting...
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:24 AM
5

Another day, another feminist largely ignored by men, another straw man rant.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:22 AM
1

Dishwasher safe?
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:01 AM
5

Which is more likely to be teeming with bacteria: an uncircumcised penis or a warm deep damp vagina? https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/17/16488540/women-reproductive-tract-microbiome-disease-health-pregnancy
/r/MensRights24/10/17 06:37 PM
1

The scapegoating of male students which has led to unfair actions against falsely accused young men which has in turn led to expensive lawsuits, causing many universities to quietly consider whether keeping anti-male propaganda departments is a viable strategy.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 11:51 AM
1

In the same vein, the very popular song by Carrie Underwood, "Before He Cheats:" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaSy8yy-mr8
/r/MensRights24/10/17 11:18 AM
2

For every woman in the spotlight, there's a man who designed the spotlight, one that operates it, in a theater designed and built by men, etc etc etc. Women haven't had power in the larger world long enough to really grasp how much they abuse it.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 11:12 AM
1

I've seen men criticized for stating they will change, for just in general being supportive, and also for just saying nothing. There is literally no avenue of dialogue open to men for many feminists. It's no accident that most of the useful rebuttals to feminism have come from women such as Cassie Jaye, The Honey Badgers, and Christina Hoff Summers. I happen to think that the West hasn't enough appreciation for the power of Yin, and that in withdrawing and being silent, and tending to each other…
/r/MensRights24/10/17 10:49 AM
1

Well, that would be tricky, since most police and other security personnel are males. If they stayed home watching football, then the males who don't give a shit about the curfew would have a field day. But that's too logical.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 02:35 AM
2

And often if not most of the time, the primary accusers were girls or women.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 02:22 AM
2

me too; the service patch of the Clone Army... Really is there anything more disempowering than to disappear into a huge group of victims? Do they think this will get them allies?
/r/MensRights23/10/17 01:56 AM
1

They flip through their flash cards of handy epithets until they think they have one that will fit, without having to engage their critical thinking skills.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 01:52 AM
3

Women will actually pick the least threatening targets to hone in on first. Back when I was more in the feminist camp, I was regularly teed off on because I was safe. Those days are gone.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 01:51 AM
3

I'm guessing that when most of the jobs are gone, men will find interesting, stimulating, competitive and rewarding activities for women to complain about. The pro gaming leagues are an early example of this.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 01:49 AM
9

Couldn't happen to a nastier excuse for a human being. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/alison-saunders-should-be-sacked-for-the-janner-case-and-for-her-absurd-views-on-rape-10353802.html
/r/MensRights23/10/17 01:46 AM
6

Otherwise intelligent women seem to be blind to the fact that evidence free accusations make them unfit to hold power in a society of laws.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 09:00 PM
1

All those people should return their Oscars! /s Hollywood owns Weinstein, warts and all. His name is all over their best products. I guess they can just turn out more Adam Sandler movies to make up for the loss.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:17 AM
1

It really does seem that airing their complaints registers with women as real power, even when not much changes. A million women marched with pussy hats in the snow in January and zero effect, yet they considered it a triumph.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:53 AM
8

Women are the primary consumers, and this kind of pandering gets eyeballs on ads.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:46 AM
1

Heh, he drives SJWs crazy cuz categories.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:45 AM
3

2017: High percentage of women come out against men in general in the movie industry. 2021: 50% of female roles in movies are virtual reality.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:40 AM
2

Wise lady. Also got herself unstuck from manners dramas and into that nice tight leather!
/r/MensRights15/10/17 06:16 PM
2

All the showbiz people demonstrating their instinct to pose in the best light possible. Now that there's not money and jobs coming from Weinstein's direction.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 10:01 AM
1

Yeah, who would want to walk on eggshells with every woman on the job? How would this help women? Women have historically been protected from the results of their unreasonableness by men who have been responsible for them. Now the blowback is increasingly raw and appropriate. It's a learning opportunity for them!
/r/MensRights15/10/17 03:23 AM
2

These women are getting power drunk off the dynamic depicted in the myth of Artemis, the virgin huntress who turned a hunter that invaded her space into a beast so his fellow hunters would kill him. It's a heady power move, to unleash the horde on a target.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 02:54 AM
1

To paraphrase Syndrome: If all men are beasts, then none are.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 02:45 AM
1

I finally got it that insecure women are addicted to this kind of prejudice to give them a dose of self-righteousness and phony dignity to offset the insecurity and low self esteem.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 01:47 AM
3

The real goal of this kind of nonsense is to produce a feeling of self-righteousness and phony dignity even while being as much of a scumbag as any man.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 01:41 AM
1

They just don't get how this type of victim feminism drives out the best and boldest from the party, turning them into the type of losers this sort of pandering is meant for.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 08:07 PM
1

They had some extra straw leftover from mansplaining, since it had so little actual content.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 07:13 PM
1

I wonder what the percentage of older men in this situation is?
/r/MensRights30/09/17 07:00 PM
3

Feminism is the single reason why Democrats have lost so many elections as well as their momentum as a force for social progress. Electing Trump over Clinton should be a clear enough message.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 06:51 PM
2

Basically, you and you alone have the power to evict her and never give her free rent in your head. How you do that is focusing on what's happening right now. Take up meditation. Take up a martial art. Practice being in the moment and understand that you and you alone are keeping this alive. And it's not her you miss. It's the thing you thought you wanted, the possibility, and you associate that with her. Your only place to be safe and happy emotionally, single or in a relationship, is in the mo…
/r/MGTOW21/09/17 01:13 AM
3

She should be in acting classes expanding her meager talents, instead of trading on her incredible good luck to be associated with a huge franchise, having been born into a fortunate culture and place, and winning the genetic lottery as well. Getting human rights advice from such as her is like getting financial advice from a mega lottery winner.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 11:17 PM
10

So, in not prosecuting, so that other women feel safe coming forward, two other consequences....other women will feel safer making false statements, and men will get the message that they don't matter, and people who feel they don't matter are not usually very good citizens.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 06:34 AM
2

I tend to agree, but the U.S. and Britain are completely weird about sex unless it can be used to sell something other than sex.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:41 PM
1

Well, it's arbitrary and there's so much hysteria around sex in this country that there's no wiggle room. Truth is, someone like Jodie Foster was more mature at age 14 than some bimbos three times that age. We've got bodies and emotions and drives that are all sorts of levels from person to person, and a conflicting need to have a stable culture. People get caught in the conflict. We err on the side of blaming males, usually. Guys are starting to respond by being a lot more cautious, and with go…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 07:48 AM
-15

The fact is that he did it, whatever he was thinking, and so under the law it was a crime.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 02:43 AM
75

Dude, he porked a 14 year old. Still statutory rape.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 01:36 AM
5

Communication studies have shown that verbal content makes up a minority of what is communicated; some studies suggest as little as 7%, behind 55% body language and 33% tone of voice. While this may not be accurate, to suggest that verbal cues should be all that is considered is like saying that anyone who is literate could perform Shakespeare well.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:11 PM
-18

My viewpoint is that women have had political and social power outside of the home for a relatively short period in history, and they're going to make mistakes, even repeating the worst mistakes of men, flirting with totalitarian, eugenic and genocidal ideas. Some of the most intelligent and fairest of them are already recognising this and speaking out. As women are learning the proper and improper uses of aggression, and how women specifically can abuse it, I think men are learning strategic pa…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 08:32 PM
2

Yeah, I had an abusive childhood, and recovering from that gave me some pretty good radar about when I'm at risk.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 03:19 AM
4

I quit teaching for the same reason I quit motorcycles...I had the growing feeling that it was just a matter of time before bad stuff happened to me, given the vibe on the college campus. This is aside from the dim prospects of getting tenure as a white male. Went to work for a health insurance company where I was treated with multiple times more respect and had security. Wasted Master's degree though.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 02:54 AM
2

Definitely focusing on vague open questions.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 02:38 AM
1

Amen. Well expressed! I have an idea that there might be learning spaces analogous to the work spaces that are forming, where learning groups could meet, while engaging at distance the main coursework. Union Institute pioneered something like this...though their model is stupidly expensive: Get a local mentor and identify a group of co-learners in your area, who meet and provide society and support, etc.
/r/MGTOW12/11/15 10:47 PM
2

Always with the lists of how men should be doing it differently. It's his world, so fucking adapt.
/r/MGTOW12/11/15 04:41 AM
2

In the past, a male or males in authority would come in and just clamp down on things. An example of this would be Reagan trapping the Berkeley rioters in the quad and teargassing them. Put a stop to the campus rioting and ushered in decades of Conservative rule as well as handing him the presidential nomination. Now we will see what arises to stop this nonsense or whether it will just keep metastasizing until universities finally crumble and get recreated in some manner that befits this era.
/r/MGTOW12/11/15 04:28 AM
1

She would never agree to this. No way to make victim points out of it.
/r/MGTOW12/11/15 03:29 AM
1

People celebrate the exuberance with which women have gone out into the world since it was made comfortable and safe for them, but they somehow don't understand or appreciate that men may have a similar exuberance at being able to finally take off the fucking harness and have a peaceful life.
/r/MGTOW12/11/15 02:06 AM
1

Trudeau has made sure 50% of his cabinet are women, regardless of whether there are more qualified men. Should go well.
/r/MGTOW12/11/15 01:50 AM
3

The author knows her audience. Most women are chronic suckers for anything that flatters them and excuses whatever part they may play in their failure to get what they want.
/r/MGTOW12/11/15 01:38 AM
3

It's a clip from the show "Dead Like Me." He is already dead and supervises grim reapers as his day job. He gives no fucks and has an amazing sense of decency.
/r/MGTOW12/11/15 01:34 AM
3

Just a cruise through any mall is enough to confirm that most consumer goods are for women and girls.
/r/MGTOW06/08/15 03:45 AM
1

We're a consumer society, and women are the apex consumers. I'm convinced the reason there is so much political support for empowering women in developing countries, rather than strengthening families is that they have an eye to new consumer markets. A lot of the slander of men is to discount their opinions when it comes to being sold stuff. After all, which family member is the one who is 'hard to buy for?' Many man are just not that materialistic beyond a few toys and tools.
/r/MGTOW06/08/15 03:26 AM
3

here you go...didn't take long: http://www.fastcodesign.com/1663594/women-dominate-the-global-market-place-here-are-5-keys-to-reaching-them http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2013/u-s--women-control-the-purse-strings.html http://www.thefemalefactor.com/statistics/statistics_about_women.html http://www.inwomenwetrust.com/resources/just-the-facts/ http://jamiedunham.com/stats-on-women/
/r/MGTOW05/08/15 09:29 PM
2

If there is an opportunity to gain attention by complaining, a certain percentage of women eventually will.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:09 AM
3

Yikes, something happened that upset you. So send a guy to jail, right?
/r/MGTOW18/07/15 09:58 AM
2

It's pretty easy to tell the men from the women in SL...the guys are bimbo'd out to the max, but the women are just constantly shopping and wanting to show you all their different looks, usually have several alts with different looks. The guys want to fuck. The women want attention.
/r/MGTOW07/07/15 07:22 AM
0

I did a lot of virtual fucking in Second Life; it's loaded with lonely women wanting to play dressup and they're usually not in a position to want a real life relationship. No worries and they look great. Also a lot of porn. Tried celibacy and ended up in a relationship with a batshit woman that finished me off for relationships in the real world for life. I like women, enjoy a lot about them, and interestingly, in Second Life, they feel freer to be more traditionally submissive and pleasing; I …
/r/MGTOW07/07/15 05:16 AM
5

A few extra digits on his bank balance might change things. The reverse was true for a friend of mine, in the SF Bay Area, completely studly guy, great sense of humor, stand-up dude all around. But worked a well paid groundskeeper job at SFSU. Could not get a girlfriend. Retired, moved back to small town Michigan and was snapped right up.
/r/MGTOW04/07/15 02:26 PM
3

Going their own way means each man chooses his own path. As for taxes, I take wisdom from centuries of monastics and individuals who have chosen to live as simply as possible to avoid contributing to evils perpetrated by governments. "Amass stores of gold and jade and no man can protect you." --Lao Tse.
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 04:10 AM
14

The idea of MGTOW as some sort of monolithic brand that can be boosted or degraded by the quality of men who individually find empowerment, solace, encouragement, and support through it, well that's kind of missing the point. Their own way means each man owns his own experience and his own association. What others think of us is by definition beside the point. Wise men have always been regarded as fools by the great mass of people. I'd advise you to look to your own path and piss off from judgin…
/r/MGTOW03/07/15 04:06 AM
11

Learn from the monastic traditions...live simply so there's nothing to take.
/r/MGTOW02/07/15 05:47 AM
6

Feminists know that they've just about burned through the bankroll of honor and sentiment women earned through their sacrifices in birthing and rearing children, and it's freaking them out. Male oriented activism just reads as abuse to true believer feminists. MGTOW is more a-feminist, staying out of the argument entirely, since the context is just poisonous to men, and does women no favors as well. Leave the empty public blather to women, and let actions make the statement.
/r/MGTOW01/07/15 09:47 PM
1

It's good to consider the difference between action and activism. Gathering and making noise is gratifying, but taking actions based on one's authentic passions, abilities and goals puts a man in alliance with the great Tao and makes a difference in the world without pushing for it.
/r/MGTOW01/07/15 03:10 AM
5

There is a point here. As monastic traditions have demonstrated for centuries, poverty is a shield against exploitation by women and society in general, if done right. Many MGTOWs in history have gotten by on as liitle as they could manage.
/r/MGTOW01/07/15 02:11 AM
6

This is supposed to matter to a MGTOW? Why?
/r/MGTOW01/07/15 02:03 AM
3

I'm guessing they err in favor of pandering to women rather than showing them more realistically because, among other factors, women are the apex consumers in our society, accounting for 80% of consumer spending. The transformation of Hermione in the Harry Potter movies from brainy geek to flawless babe pretty much ruined the dynamic of the movies and made it impossible to think she would go for Ron...so many many other examples.
/r/MGTOW30/06/15 01:53 AM
6

Blacks in most cultures have cause to be generally disgruntled. In England and the U.S., [edit] they black women have cultural protection from being hassled back, and so can just turn the bitch up to 11. Only in this sub and a couple others would I add that there may be some cause in being raised without fathers.
/r/MGTOW29/06/15 11:20 PM
8

MGTOW activism is an oxymoron. On the other hand, groups, resources and activities that cater to MGTOWs but don't resist or proselytize would be really useful. Men's amateur games, digital and physical, men's shared living spaces, boarding houses, set up in such a way that feminism cannot invade with their dominating victim logic. In the past this was done with religious orders, and perhaps the wisdom that can be taken from this is the vow of poverty aspect. Women leave poor men alone.
/r/MGTOW29/06/15 10:58 PM
1

Always been a bit of a mystery to me as well, though it seems to inspire some sort of vicarious excitement in a lot of men. I can't help look beyond the glory of the game to the years of brain trauma and muscular/skeletal damage. Feels like these people are being sacrificed to compensate for the average guy's feelings of powerlessness and general fuckedness.
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 08:39 PM
1

I've given thoughts to the idea of boarding houses as well. Of course, in the past, getting fed cheaply required someone providing a lot of labor, a woman usually. Now of course it's inexpensive and convenient to get meals a variety of ways. As for the camaraderie, this does seem to be of a bygone age, as well as the result of generations of feminist well-poisoning of the culture of male spaces, equating them with abusive environments to women. Much of what is left is around corporate sports, wh…
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 06:51 AM
1

If you can do a better job than Alan Watts, then all the best to you. But even he only referred to himself as a spiritual entertainer. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC848b72MStS_1twAV97p0yQ
/r/MGTOW26/06/15 04:57 PM
2

So now we know that trolls can look like you as well.
/r/MGTOW25/06/15 09:43 AM
3

We're talking hydrogenated peanut butter here. Because peanut butter ground from roasted peanuts with no additives has enough oil that's fluid at room temp that the surface smoothes out after it's been scooped. Maybe this is why women who don't buy into our consumer culture don't seem like damaged goods from previous lovers, because they don't see themselves or present themselves as consumer goods in the first place.
/r/MGTOW25/06/15 09:39 AM
19

Simple. Their male peers are going for younger women, if they are dating at all.
/r/MGTOW24/06/15 07:13 AM
0

No media ever went broke showing women to themselves in the most flattering light, no matter how extreme the fiction.
/r/MGTOW24/06/15 05:06 AM
2

go towards the Bud Light, my son...
/r/MGTOW22/06/15 07:11 PM
1

My preference would be a bear.
/r/MGTOW22/06/15 03:19 AM
2

How to create unusual interest in children: Spend hundreds of years associating sexiness with taboos. Then take away all the taboos but one. Congrats, England, for being the culture that learned how to mass produce fetishes.
/r/MGTOW21/06/15 09:50 PM
1

Check out the work of Virginia Satir. She describes the family as analogous to a mobile sculpture; when one person moves, the whole family has to move, and they resist this. The whole point of groups like Alanon and Narcanon is that families need to deal with their desires to undercut the one who is getting healthier for whatever their reasons are. http://renaissanceranch.net/virginia-satir
/r/MGTOW20/06/15 02:03 PM
2

One of my faves is to skin chicken thighs, pop 'em in with chopped onions, chili powder and garlic. Later: Burritos! Lots of easy cold weather stews with chicken, carrots, potatoes, cabbage, onion, simon and garfunkel spices (parsley, sage..etc etc) Meaty spaghetti sauce with ground turkey (lower in fat) italian spices, tomatoes, tomato paste, garlic onions.. These are all pretty hard to screw up, which is the way I like my recipes.
/r/MGTOW19/06/15 11:43 AM
2

This sounds like an awesome recipe that I would trouble myself to make only if I had company. Old and lazy guy here. I love to cook chicken with alfredo sauce in a slow cooker until the meat is falling off the bone, and put it over noodles or rice. I make enough for several meals this way also. Onion chopped on the floor of the cooker, then chicken, mushrooms, and then sauce. I add parmesan after.
/r/MGTOW19/06/15 09:40 AM
2

This leads to chaos and creative blockage, which is just fine with some of them. Feminists are free to create whatever games they wish...that is equality.
/r/MGTOW18/06/15 07:34 AM
1

http://www.livestrong.com/article/60852-lower-sex-drive/http://www.outsideonline.com/1786681/will-endurance-training-hurt-my-sex-life
/r/MGTOW15/06/15 06:26 AM
0

I've read a good number of accounts of the apology and nowhere is there any mention of apology to the fraternity. Nothing. Fortunately for them, there is the legal system.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 10:00 AM
1

They're not going to fire her, because the feminist backlash would be huge. Instead, they get to look even more like an unaccountable organization. But every publication has taken notice about what this has cost Rolling Stone and there will be very quiet conversations about how to respond in the future.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:47 AM
6

Jackie hasn't said shit, on the advice of her lawyer.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:37 AM
3

Not even a straw man...she's just tossing straw around in a barn. How much of a loser do you have to be to try to belittle someone as their back recedes.
/r/MGTOW26/03/15 06:47 AM
3

We go to movies to see things that don't usually happen in real life. Women talking to each other is definitely not in that category.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 09:16 PM
1

dick, douche, dickhead, insensitive asshole, arrogant prick, callous cad, one of those. Of course this won't keep her from saying later that he was, but it will reduce the chances, hopefully.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 06:50 AM
0

She's about 2 clicks of the dial away from "Hairspray."
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:09 AM
1

Know the woman you want to sleep with. Assess that she's level headed in her life as much as you can. No drunken hookups. If she's into kinky stuff right away, back off. Do not be a dick at any stage of the hookup.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:03 AM
5

Who reads Time Magazine?
/r/MensRights24/03/15 11:36 AM
5

What a lovely humane point of view. Does my old male heart good.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 11:27 AM
13

Good lord, the woman is a childcare worker! What would be the sentence for a man in the same circumstances! No word on if she gets to keep working in that field, and why can't she be named?
/r/MensRights24/03/15 07:42 AM
6

They are keeping things vague and undecided to avoid the probable uproar from the believers if they admit that the 90% of the girl's bullshit they know about indicates that the rest is bullshit as well.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:02 AM
2

UVA has been harmed by the RS article as well. They will pay in reduced applications, notably from young men, and their endowments will probably take a hit as well. In their rush to white knight panicked young women, they need to understand that young men who join fraternities have loving, litigious parents as well, who will jealously defend their sons' honor.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 12:31 AM
1

Maleness=Value Added.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 08:51 PM
1

Poser, posing.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 09:59 AM
3

In an age of cloud based information, cheap telepresence, rapidly changing educational and vocational focus, and outrageous costs of university fees, we are ripe for the destruction of this old model that requires people to drop what they are doing, move close to a physical library, and sit in rows listening to lectures. The doom of the university was sealed when the power of academic faculty was taken by the administrative staff and students became viewed as consumers, not learners. If your stu…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 01:20 AM
0

I like the viewpoint that feminism is a useful tool for dominating all people. By psychologically gelding males, and putting spending in the hands of females, you get a more docile, more easily panicked and security accepting populace.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 09:11 PM
2

As long as women control the majority of the spending, they will continue to be pandered to. I wonder if there will ever be a tipping point when women start waking up to what this is costing them. It seems at least they are having to earn more of the money they spend, as men are getting turned off to giving it to them. For now, governments are siphoning off men's earnings in taxes and giving it to women, but that can't last forever, particularly in the most debt-ridden nations.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 09:04 PM
3

The shift of power from academic staff to administrative staff, of the role of students transformed from learners to consumers has allowed this phenomenon of students demanding comfort and care, and a mint on the pillow at night. The university system is ripe for destruction and revisioning. Also I think it is proper for women to be the chief critics of feminist lunacy.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 03:47 PM
10

For there to be any point to this, the girls should be given part of their money by some of the boys, and the boys should be made to do something injurious or hard for their money. Also, a sizeable portion of the girls should be given pastry by boys for being pretty. In fact that would be a great way to subvert this. Have the boys who can afford it give the pastries to the prettiest girls. Maybe the cheerleaders.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 10:54 PM
1

Women have much more of an own-group preference than men. Men have evolved to see other men as potential rivals, and to prefer to attend to the needs of women, and not other men.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 02:41 PM
0

Leadership is given, is earned. If women seeking to lead are focussed strictly on the problems of women and children, no leadership will accrue to them, eventually.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 05:55 AM
5

First off, if she was supposed to rescue a male, nobody would be interested.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 03:53 AM
2

And then get suspended for harassing behavior and language. Nuh uh.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 10:30 PM
0

If women sat back and thought about this a little, they would realize how damning it is to their gender and would raise hell about it instead of hounding some men for saying or doing some innocuous thing out of line.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:06 PM
6

They're backing further into the corner. Let's hand 'em more paint.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:02 PM
7

A. Women control the majority of consumer spending. B. The customer is always right.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:40 PM
1

They say that eventually every enterprise ends up accomplishing the opposite of its original intent...colleges are now producing new ignorance instead of new knowledge.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 10:52 AM
1

Maybe so...they're on a roll with the 'yes means yes' laws.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:26 AM
4

I wonder if any judge is going to go on record awarding against an internet troll. That would be a hellish precedent.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:46 AM
1

No meat in the article.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:11 AM
1

He picks his fights. I think he would have come off a bully challenging them directly in that format.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:38 PM
0

I'm pretty sure this is a phenomenon of misplaced anxiety; the futures of these young people are more uncertain than ever was the case for university students...they've been good little obedient students, got the grades, looking at probably underemployment with massive debt, climate change, shrinking white privilege, and so on. Easier to get into hysterics about fantasy rape. If a woman is hostile to men, then it is not possible for her to imagine a man approaching her sexually in a friendly man…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:35 PM
1

Death and the Maiden...Signourney Weaver and Ben Kingsley... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109579/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_52 Hard Candy....... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0424136/?ref_=nv_sr_1
/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:28 PM
-1

I tried a little additional research...reports all over the map. Such a touchy subject in so many respects...national pride, caste issues, old wounds of empire, slanted reports in all directions...SMH.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 07:40 PM
4

New, improved label; now sticks to anything!!
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:25 PM
4

The entire action movie genre has as a staple high numbers of nameless faceless men dying in the background, and the hero emerges covered in blood at the end. Probably the legacy of centuries of war, where men were cannon fodder if they weren't especially valuable in some other way.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 02:15 PM
13

It was only a matter of time; interesting that such a corporate fighter would get into this area. Must be a lot of money at stake. Welcome to the real world, feminists.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 02:08 PM
0

Seems like the market will provide insulation from the harping. I think of all the morality lectures about popular music, but it still gets made and sold in the absence of any legal censorship. Same thing with games. Free speech and the power of the wallet.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:19 AM
1

Like a lot of feminist actions, this one has downsides for women, maybe even intentional. For women who want men to take charge, who want to be responsive, not assertive, this is a roadblock thrown up to sexual enjoyment. Funny how much of feminism is about killing pleasure between men and women. Almost as if it was a core value.
/r/MGTOW17/03/15 12:58 AM
4

I wonder what year it will be before society understands that there will never be enough that it can do for women.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 09:06 PM
7

This is like getting advice for getting rich from a lottery winner.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 08:34 PM
27

Basic witchhunt stuff; if you're not with us then you're for them. 2. Women need to feel like people are concerned with them. Without the traditional family menfolk looking out for them, they want the same feeling from a more fragmented society, and rape culture is their excuse.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:14 PM
0

False accusations are a crime, even if not punished often enough. "Believe the accuser" amounts to a policy of advocating covering up for criminals.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 05:48 AM
8

Welcome to the reality of most MGTOWs, lady. Only we don't hate, we just stay clear. She needs to take responsibility for the men she has attracted to her, which of course means the discomfort of self-examination. Easier to just hate all men, and she has the luxury of getting cover for this from feminism.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 05:24 AM
1

That's not even a straw man...just throwing straw around the barn....
/r/MensRights16/03/15 05:09 AM
0

Bullshit..anger is anger, no gender need be assigned. Anger can get things done, or destroy things, depending on how it's used. This is funky concern trolling in my book.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 01:45 AM
-1

They seem to think they can ignore history because somehow herstory turn out with different results for the same actions.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 05:24 PM
0

At some point, someone felt "unsafe," and that was enough.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 06:16 AM
24

Some women really believe in the policing of thought.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 03:25 AM
1

The word privilege assumes that there is some authority somewhere that has granted it. I guess in the feminist imagination that would be the patriarchy, which is also a problematic concept. As a straight white male, I will admit that I have had advantages due to the way things have shaken out in history. Somehow that doesn't have the same shaming ring to it as "privileged." For the average working class level or below white person, the term privilege makes no sense. The children of the wealthy, …
/r/MensRights14/03/15 10:44 PM
2

The common mistake of progressive actions to empower and free women is thinking that they will succeed without male peers of these women being on board. It's like building one side of a bridge and expecting it to stay up.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 10:10 PM
0

That's funny and well done!
/r/MensRights14/03/15 10:02 PM
9

There is something that feminists want that they dance around saying plainly: The inner experience of women should result in real world consequences for others.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 09:57 PM
4

Everyone deserves admiration and respect, but for who they are, not because of their gender. When it is about gender, then it's impossible to get to the real things we respect each other for. Feminists propose a world in which men don't count...it's the context they operate from--even as they use the world that men have given them to assert that vision.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:16 PM
21

Also, she seems to be fine with sex as a reward for men, rather than something shared between two people who want it. Isn't this sexist?
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:54 AM
1

Seems like some sort of lawsuit is possible here.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 10:18 PM
0

The point of much of feminist complaints is to install them in men's consciousness. Unless they are paid attention to by men, many women do not feel they exist. So they will grab attention whatever way works best for them. Mental implants instead of boobs.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 09:17 PM
6

Well, that is a win-win situation, right there.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 03:22 PM
11

Until the laws that make marriage a huge stinking trap for men are changed, good luck. The trend is going the other way right now.
/r/MGTOW12/03/15 03:18 PM
1

Trying to make science based on women's subjective experience is a fool's errand.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:33 PM
3

The core liberal movement has begun to disappear up its own asshole, bypassing common sense for the warm stinky coziness of groupthink and ideoletry.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 08:04 PM
0

Guilt never made anyone good. 2. The playing field is uneven, set up so honest feedback is received as abusive. 3. Men have been turned against themselves. 4. There is a ton of power in withdrawal, if done consciously. 5. Your hand is your friend.
/r/MGTOW11/03/15 08:00 PM
1

Boy, this sort of stat slinging has gotten so old. Also, 100% of snakes sleep coiled up...we should have 50% of them sleeping in a straight line so we can see their patterns better... ffs.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 07:07 PM
0

From the point of view of the planet and its ecological balance, it's a win that we're having fewer babies. As far as men not "growing up," well, we've carried the big load for centuries, and slacking off looks as good to us as gaining power and responsibility does to women. How many of our grandfathers great-grandfathers would have passed on the chance to take off the harness and have some slack?
/r/MensRights10/03/15 10:02 PM
3

Worst sports drink name ever...
/r/MensRights10/03/15 09:21 PM
1

Yep, that's called keeping your women trapped on a pedestal. You'll get a lot of the same language from the muslims as well. "The real Gandhi mistreated his family. He wrote about his illiterate wife: "I simply cannot bear to look at Ba's face. The expression is often like that on the face of a meek cow and gives one the feeling as a cow occasionally does, that in her own dumb manner she is saying something." Also: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/jan/27/mohandas-gandhi-women-india
/r/MensRights10/03/15 06:58 PM
22

Wow, the answer was softened and muffled and danced around as much as the writer could manage and still actually tell the truth. Yes, mothers make less than dads with custody, but not those who are paying child support. The important thing--that the deadbeat dad is an unfair, one-sided caricature--he avoids mentioning. It's natural to want to go soft on women...they do have challenges in life and are more sensitive to them and to criticism. However, when it comes to justice, nothing less than th…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 10:59 AM
7

Sounds like sexism is used here in part as a synonym for sexually attracted. No wonder women were subjugated for so many years...it simplifies the shit out of things. Trying to arrange things so they align with women's interior experience is a recipe for chaos, injustice, cultural disruption.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:42 AM
2

Skipped over a few things, there buckos...you know, physics, biology, medicine, universities, astronomy, the chair your ass is in, the computer you're facing, the vibrating dildo in your wife's bedside table, etc etc etc.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 08:05 AM
2

The term "rat race" was around even in the 50's if not before. We have less stuff, but it does more. It's still a sucker's game, only communication has gotten good enough that we're much more aware of it now. I'm thinking some sort of secular monastic movement, voluntary simplicity, maybe like the Jesuits, devoted to scholarship and scientific discovery, etc. Certainly the middle class dream, which was already crap decades ago, has no attraction, particularly for men.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:54 AM
7

Comparing the best of women to the worst of men, as usual. As if the female shadow wasn't black as night, ruthless beyond the capacity of most men, petty, vengeful, vain, greedy, and insecure. They deserve a turn at bat, if for nothing else to give people a good look.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 04:13 AM
1

It's no mystery...it's about feeling invisable, unwanted...suddenly there is this huge influx of attention and sympathy. A mainline hit. Possibly comes from the same emptiness that causes men to go on shooting sprees.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 12:53 AM
0

I'm always struck by the smugness, the assumption of gender purity at these kinds of protests, like women have no part in violence or sexual abuse. Like they are not the primary abusers of children. And so on. It's like some group denial/culpability exorcism. And it is creepy and potentially ruthless under the right circumstances. Greek mythology features some pretty ruthless behavior that women can get up to in groups, and it's not groundless at all.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:56 AM
3

And some see the black and blue and never wonder what the man looks like, whether she (just as likely as not) initiated the violence, never question her story at all, the poor dear.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 11:47 PM
5

No, it's just a bonus.
/r/MGTOW07/03/15 11:07 PM
4

Threats are exactly what feminists want and need to bankroll their ground troops of white knights and clueless women into supporting their dubious projects.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 06:52 PM
3

She smiled so unrelentingly I got nervous about her teeth drying out. No new ground covered here. Too bad she didn't get into how Disney men are most recently punching bags, particularly the beta ones.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 06:39 PM
3

Only two important things to see about this book and movie: 1. The man has a lot of money. 2. He is giving her his undivided attention for long periods of time. The rest is just style.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 06:33 PM
3

Yes, it's a proven way to get men in power to listen to you and take you seriously by referring to their elite governing body in a way that infantilizes them. Really? Still using "boys club" after all these years. Signals that you have no punch in your glove.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 11:04 PM
1

This is really bad news for the people who will have to deal with her all those years. They don't deserve that.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 09:35 PM
1

Whatever.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 08:55 PM
1

Friedan, Steinem, there's been a very Jewish flavor to feminism since The Feminine Mystique. Markedly differing from first wave feminism, second wave has underpinnings of both Marxist philosophy and zionist political gambits. The result is that both Jews and women occupy better than average social niches in society while presenting themselves as threatened victims.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 03:46 PM
4

Chatter, work on their looks, critique other women's looks, work in groups doing something innocuous, a lot of the time. Drama, glamour, consumerism, conformity.
/r/MGTOW05/03/15 11:38 AM
7

Really? Spotting a problem with dicks that are too large for most vaginas is a sign of insecurity? I'd much rather slam a lovely butt with my thighs without worrying that I'll hear a shriek because I nailed the girl's cervix. Not especially well hung myself, but I have nailed the cervixes of a couple women and it sure killed the mood. It's a logistic that I'm glad I didn't have to usually worry about. As far as insecurity, I'm 68 and everything is shrivelled up anymore, so mostly I have nice mem…
/r/MensRights05/03/15 08:58 AM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/history/comments/2xt5e2/what_are_some_examples_of_people_who_worked_alone/
/r/MGTOW05/03/15 02:08 AM
-3

Can we go with cunt-trolling instead?
/r/MensRights04/03/15 09:05 PM
10

There looks to me to be a fair amount of wisdom in the article, but what is omitted is the glaring fact that women are in roles they have never been in before, are not emotionally suited for, and cannot perform without being drugged to the nipples. This is the price of "good as any man" propaganda. Perhaps as technology allows us to do more from home, women can start choosing lives that fit their emotional profile while still having challenging and interesting participation in the world.
/r/MGTOW04/03/15 08:57 PM
4

I watch porn movies where guys with huge schlongs have to fake slamming home when they're backing off halfway in so they don't end up somewhere in the fallopian tubes. This can't be satisfying, to not feel that wonderful slap of thighs to butt.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 08:11 PM
2

I must have a wider assortment of asian men in my stereotype, because these men don't seem especially striking. In the Navy, when I went to the beach, I was struck by how many beautifully built young men there were, feeling like a huge white lump in contrast.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 05:24 AM
3

This is most likely if there is significant money involved. This was the wisdom of monastics...they held no personal wealth to be got at, and tied all their income to their holy work. AA is non-affiliated and there are many mens--and women's-only groups. Their non-participation in the economy puts them largely outside the reach of the law. The thing about men is, that they are good at creating and producing stuff, and this inevitably draws the greed of the government and women.
/r/MGTOW04/03/15 02:54 AM
2

Flat out slander. Also feeling threatened does not equal actual danger.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:50 AM
3

Other countries are not all up on the gender divide and conquer modality yet.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 01:18 AM
14

Rallying around the accuser for reasons of protecting her reputation feels more important than actual justice. Fear of losing social approval is very strong and personal in women. Including them in all areas of social life with this predeliction for vengefulness over justice has created a whole new range of problems. No doubt historically most women did not attain power in general society due to the propensity for a certain percentage of them to be batshit.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:23 PM
1

It feels to them like an excusable outlet for their aggression, I would think, cleansed of the usual male bad-dog taint of aggression by the innocence of the put-upon woman.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:01 PM
7

Fine. Don't. Now go away.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:52 PM
1

Another day, another gripe. Don't they understand that people know they're after the money and clean work, not because women passionate about the field are being held back?
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:50 PM
3

Arquette grabbed a lot of attention with her remarks and feminists found a way to get some it, drawn irresistibly like a cat to a sunbeam, or a laptop...pick one. It's always important to recognise that most professional feminists have nothing else to attract attention to themselves; they're losers with only their gender to make them special.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:41 PM
13

So much poison in this concern troll article. Failing to mention that most divorces are instigated by women, for one thing. Waltzing in with an opinion about the poor woman who will have to work without knowing any particulars about the case. Slandering men as all violent, etc. Ugly is as ugly does.
/r/MGTOW03/03/15 09:41 AM
3

Having married a woman who I thought was really cool and fun, and then watching her descend--with several of her woman friends--into believing she had been the victiim of satanic abuse as a child, then after I escaped, driving everyone who supported her away...well I just don't trust women to be sane, at the level of intimate partnership, any more. I haven't been in a relationship for over 20 years, and my loneliness is a much higher quality than any time in my marriage.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:22 AM
2

I think some version of the monastic life, mutual aid brotherhoods, guilds, supporting excellence, spiritual growth, scholarship, competence, collaborative projects, etc. will eventually form. It will be bitterly opposed by women, but as long as the groups are not dependent on government largesse, they will have freedom.
/r/MGTOW03/03/15 07:13 AM
128

False on the face of it. Women hold huge economic and political power.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 07:01 AM
3

Just another slandroid...can be ignored.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:57 AM
1

It doesn't matter about the individual woman...it's the cultural matrix we live in that's toxic to marriage. It's possible to get a very traditional bride from another country, and after a few years in the U.S. she'll be messed up.
/r/MGTOW02/03/15 04:58 PM
5

“Sometimes I wonder if men and women really suit each other. Perhaps they should live next door and just visit now and then.” ― Katharine Hepburn
/r/MGTOW01/03/15 08:19 PM
2

Ok, I'll call 911 for you, lady, but I'm not going to rescue you and let you bleed all over my house.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 06:02 AM
14

Just as women have discovered the power of aggression and waging war on men, so men are discovering the power of Yin, of Judo, of just not being there when the blows, the betrayals, the injustices show up. It's long overdue that our country learn the power of Yin. Women used to have and use it to good effect, now it falls to men to demonstrate the wisdom and power of conscious disengagement.
/r/MGTOW27/02/15 08:19 AM
2

The hook of the the piece comes right before the end when he regrets "allowing Paul a platform." That's the real thrust of his essay.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:08 AM
3

Also, why do snakes sleep all coiled up when they could be sleeping in a nice straight line? Somebody fix this.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 07:19 PM
1

I'm liking Constantine, if you enjoy supernatural stuff.
/r/MGTOW22/02/15 02:21 PM
3

The poor fragile dears. Sheesh, everyone with an opinion and a soapbox on the internet gets dumptrucks of abuse backed up every day. Nobody is making them read it.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 04:33 AM
1

Same old distorted hit piece bullet points. Yawn
/r/MensRights22/02/15 03:07 AM
3

No mention of boys in the long column of comments.. .
/r/MensRights22/02/15 01:36 AM
1

I think a good way to go would be to fund this man to take his case to higher courts and get this practice disallowed in the land.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 01:32 AM
4

How dare people be all mad at these brave women who only want to slander all men as rapists, patriarchs, children, creeps, deadbeats, etc.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 02:27 AM
22

This has to be reckoned with at some point: An upset woman does not require moving heaven and earth to accomodate. A woman feeling threatened does not equal a woman in danger, and it is madness to try to arrange things so that no woman feels threatened.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 09:16 PM
7

One can presume this does not apply to janitorial staff.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 03:14 PM
1

Link to article in Reason: http://reason.com/blog/2015/02/19/meet-two-lawyers-who-defend-the-accused
/r/MensRights20/02/15 03:05 PM
4

I am convinced that the theoretical bases for all feminism represent a misstatement of history and gender facts. Regardless of whatever social engineering projects--sans impact plans--that have proceeded from feminist victories, the rationale as stated for feminism is flawed and indefensible factually and logically. I can see women's rights as flowing as much from the general trend towards greater equality and human rights as much as from any victories by feminism.
/r/MensRights20/02/15 03:04 PM
6

So rare to hear a woman making known what she wants.... but omitting to make a case for why she merits it. /s
/r/MensRights20/02/15 01:22 AM
3

Not everyone is designed to be a "human doing." Some of the most productive people in history have been introverts and not all that enthusiastic about life. Descartes hardly got out of bed. Exploration and adventure can be had in one's inner life as well. I've had a lot of support from the Tao Te Ching, which honors stillness and disengagement as part of life. Here is my favorite chapter concerning that, and a link to the book below. All the best. "Give up learning, and put an end to your troubl…
/r/MGTOW17/02/15 11:46 PM
2

My sense is that since feminists are so odious to men that none will come within their personal orbit, the only way they can feel that surge of power from shaming and controlling a male is in the public/legal sphere. There will be a karmic price for this because arrogance always creates a vacuum for fail to enter down the line.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 02:27 AM
2

Well, I'd say it's part of the evolution of culture, and that a lot of the fetish aspects of porn are reactions from centuries of repression. Porn is not intimacy, and people crave intimacy, if they can find a partner who is of truly good will, that they can trust not to fuck them over for their money and their children.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 02:14 AM
2

Thanks! Posted..
/r/MGTOW16/02/15 08:13 PM
2

We'll have a lot of really well educated cat ladies then.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 05:42 PM
12

What a surprise: Prioritizing gender equity over competence in hiring turns off competent people!
/r/MensRights16/02/15 05:34 PM
1

Um, if all men are, then no men are.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 01:45 AM
3

Vigil-Aunties.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:54 PM
3

If these people were coming from an adult emotional place, they wouldn't consider making hateful remarks on a public forum expecting no contrary feedback. That is an adolescent level at best. Banning you is a fun thing for them, and makes them feel even cozier in their tight little fantasy circle.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:53 AM
2

We become what we resist, it is said. Better to aim at worthy goals and ignore the slanderous attention-grabbing strategies.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:47 AM
2

At least there's more agreement that misandrist is an actual word now days.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 07:11 AM
1

She says, "If you feel unattractive and unloved, why do you have to take it away from other people?" Hellooo...um can we talk about Feminism?
/r/MensRights13/02/15 05:41 AM
2

Synonyms for "jezebel" from Merriam-Webster: "bimbo [slang], chippie (also chippy), doxy (also doxie), fancy woman, hoochie [slang], hussy, floozy, minx, quean, slut, tramp, trollop, wench, whore" Consider the source and that they chose that name.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:39 AM
3

Not caring that they got hurt is the same as them not getting hurt in her imagination. Feels just the same, which is what counts.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:22 AM
26

It's basic herd management. Exploit the cows, neuter the males, except for a few elite bulls. Compared to men, women are more gullible, docile, good for mundane tasks, great consumers, and will submit to the strongest authority. By turning on the men in their own class, they are doing the work of the elites; useful idiots.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:40 PM
17

A commenter below the article chides the author for discussing Nungasser "as if his name had been cleared." Well, officially it has. Not good enough for the extremophile railroad committee, though.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:25 PM
1

I would be interested in a mutual benefit society based on MGTOW principles, with the guideline developed by AA of "the least possible organization." I am, as I suspect a lot of MGTOW's are, more comfortable in solitude, but enjoy conversation, not necessarily in a physical club, but rather in local meetups. A physical, stable, club presents issues of upkeep, dues, etc. And it would be a stationary target for feminist wrath as well. Acknowledging the principle that women talk face to face and me…
/r/MGTOW11/02/15 03:29 PM
1

They prosecute, fine, and jail people for "swatting." False DV claims are many times worse than swatting in outcome, if not immediate danger posed. There need to be laws on the books for this kind of crime. And it is a crime.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:13 PM
1

Which "whites" are we talking about? Irish? English? Swedes? Germans? Poles? Russians? French? Poor whites have always been persuaded to fight for the causes of the rich by appealing to their desire to make life safe and better for their families. To believe otherwise leaves one open to--let's call it race based pattern generalization. http://jah.oxfordjournals.org/content/92/3/1026.full?sid=0427cfda-1abf-4a52-8f61-3fd8dcaa5cce
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:08 PM
37

The real motive for this writing seems to be what (edit)he snuck in right at the last: "But I am also very doubtful that time spent debating the truth of her story and allowing Paul a platform is constructive." Management of the story has gotten away from them, so it's time to shut it down. Standard Soviet propaganda move.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:01 PM
0

Lol, 40% of sorority members raped or assaulted? Reported maybe. Greek campus culture seems like some leftover zombie social movement in hand-tinted black and white from the early 20th century, slammed with the hookup culture in some messy remix that is full of fail, much as current education is full of fail.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:55 PM
-1

Pretty woman parroting others ideas sloppily for likes. Yawn
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:33 PM
0

Lol. Or else what? I'm paraphrasing the thinking of Karen Straughan, who has thought long, hard and well about it. Too much to have tried to convey in a couple sentences, but I commend you to her very excellent videos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA&list=PLbA7X2U_AzlKZhRkaHH-cJgRq9azNygpV
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:10 PM
1

Maybe having been raised to know they will not be struck physically has bled over into them thinking they can say whatever they want and there will not be any political or social blowback. I can only wonder if they so deeply feel that they don't matter that they feel they can say the most offensive things, take the most arrogant stands and that it won't matter either.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:22 AM
1

My ex-wife submitted a poem to a local women's newspaper, a feminist rag, about how she projected onto me that I was a monster when it was her that was the monster. My female employer let me go the next day after reading it. She was a small business owner and struggling, so I didn't fight it.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:12 AM
-1

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. --Mahatma Gandhi We're somewhere between laughing and fighting.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:06 AM
20

Wow, they even used the sign colors of that fucked up church.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:05 AM
1

Oh, whites have fought for elite whites in the name of "freedom" but didn't even get to vote if they weren't landowners until relatively recently. White men fought for union rights, so they could feed their families and come home in one piece, but men don't band together and fight for themselves, usually. We're oriented to fighting for others.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 07:50 AM
-1

The difference is that black people fought for their rights for generations, and non-elite white males so far have not. An analogy would be saying all blacks are going great because professional athletes.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:27 AM
2

University of Hamster, graduate studies division.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 12:13 AM
1

Exactly, and with corresponding politeness as well.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 09:31 PM
4

Unlike a jail sentence, where they let you out early for cooperating.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 09:29 PM
14

Authority is given by those being lead. If it is not given, then the leader must exert control, use the force of their position, hence they come across as bossy: authoritarian, controlling, dictatorial. A talented teacher will be given authority. One who is self-doubting, self-centered, ideological, and/or career minded will have to resort to bossiness to get cooperation. Those in position because of social promotion will not be seen as having earned it, whether a quota woman, or the boss's neph…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 09:17 PM
4

Lovely answer, clear and to the point!
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:02 AM
2

I'm starting to think that "patriarchy" fulfills the same role for feminist dogma as "the devil" does for fundamentalist religion. A catchall explanation for whatever bad is happening, and an excuse to not look for other causes.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 11:13 PM
6

I do believe that it will be women who take down feminism, out of both respect for men and for the genuine well-being of women. Feminists are as self-defeating as any extremist organization, using words and emotional manipulation instead of roadside bombs, but still making more enemies than allies. Ms. Young, Christina Hoff Sommers, Karen Straughan....it's like breathing oxygen to hear rationality, intelligence and truth coming from female lips.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 10:39 PM
1

Gotta keep them female viewers nodding and buying the stuff advertised.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 10:25 PM
1

paywallpaywallpaywallpaywallpaywallpaywallpaywallpaywallpaywall
/r/MensRights09/02/15 10:02 PM
1

Aww, look at her little tear-stained face. How sorry she must feel for herself!
/r/MensRights09/02/15 09:56 PM
15

She's only doing what she learned from popular culture, including the media format doing the criticizing. And the focus? What he can provide for her and the children, and how her slander can jeopardize that. She's still the center of concern.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 09:39 PM
40

Underneath all the slogans and buzzwords and blather, there is an emotional 9 year old who is convinced boys are icky and no good, who deflects all responsibility onto them. And they say men should grow up...
/r/MensRights09/02/15 09:10 PM
1

Don't you mean "on estrogen?" heh
/r/MensRights09/02/15 09:01 PM
2

paywall
/r/MensRights08/02/15 11:32 PM
157

This is like the sexual version of swatting, and there should be laws on the books. Like swatting, every accusation should be taken seriously, but false claims need to have consequences.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 10:31 PM
2

Some women, when they get angry, just throw the nastiest words around like they were plates and cookware. In the moment, the intent is only to damage, not to make sense.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:50 PM
-1

So much criticism of how women are portrayed in video games. I have a female character in World of Warcraft who is 1/3 the mass of a male of the same race and class, yet she is rated exactly the same. This is an unrealistic portrayal, but there is never any criticism of this from feminists, not even from the angle that it might give young women too much confidence in real world fighting...
/r/MensRights08/02/15 03:17 AM
3

I have a problem with assholes and cowards, whatever banner they hide behind. My problem with feminism is that they don't punish their assholes, unlike most movements.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 12:25 AM
30

Not a small woman either...zero expectation of disapproval in the way she tells it...her inner feelings justified the violence and others should just understand that.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 12:24 AM
17

This sort of shit keeps women out of power more than any chauvinism on the part of men. Who is going to trust people who are this gleefully unfair and biased?
/r/MensRights07/02/15 09:26 PM
3

Saying that males dominate society is like saying one end of a magnet dominates the magnet. Men have taken the roles they have taken largely to increase the chances for women and children to flourish, and the glory and fame have been compensation for the huge toll in male toil,risk and bloodshed. Male and female roles were a system, evolved over centuries to produce viable societies in which women could be protected and children raised. Not "fair" but functional. And frequently, older women held…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 09:17 PM
6

Try having a male crash a female event and see what happens. No safe spaces for bad, bad men.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 09:11 PM
5

After watching politics since the 60's, I would say that progressive projects have been derailed and disempowered by feminism, robbing them of the male potency of the labor movements of the decades preceding. A man will fight for his wife and family...not so much for just himself.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 08:54 PM
1

I have never posted nor have had any friends post anything that was other than banal and safe. I finally unsubscribed to Facebook just so I wouldn't have any connection to people who I used to know but have no connection to now who would be reading my posts. I found it stifling, the way it was set up.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:53 PM
1

Um, if everyone who identifies with men's rights issues boycotted this movie there would barely be a blip in their attendance figures. Not the intended audience. Well reasoned critiques and comments will probably be more noticeable. Also, Big Hero 6 was a great movie for boys to watch. So Disney is temporarily on my good side. If I could erase one of their movies, it would be Brave, where every single male was an idiot and the three little boys were transformed into bears with nobody even giving…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:14 PM
1

And people who are taking up more than one seat when others are standing? What should we expect of them?
/r/MensRights07/02/15 09:40 AM
2

Looks like the man is getting some good support anyway. The species asshole has two genders, definitely.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:49 AM
6

Wow, I'll bet nobody is happy about that information going out, but the wife and daughter opened up the can of whoop-ass, and there was plenty left in it for them. An amazing element of feminism is their totally nuts belief that there will not be blowback from their aggression, that somehow the physical reality that they can't be hit extends to the realm of words as well. I actually salute Elam for flopping it all right out there, as a sign to women who participate in character assassination tha…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:35 AM
2

Occams Razor..the simplest answer is usually right. Unattractive women without enough to do have engineered ways to call attention themselves for the most basic element of their existence...their gender.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:19 AM
4

Prepare to get a little shot of bitchface as often as not.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 12:30 AM
8

She's gonna freak when she gets tipped for child support.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 12:26 AM
0

Oh, so success in this endeavor would be a sort of "Triumph of the Will?" The stupendously fuckheaded assumption that men as a class are wrong and need to be fixed should be laughed at. Saying patriarchal culture should be changed is saying that one end of the magnet should have its charge altered.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:08 PM
17

Logical arguments just feel wrong to them and should be banished, because they just upset the sisters.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:05 PM
0

These demonstrations of intolerance and unfairness do more to call into question women's fitness to participate in a lawful society than any fantastical patriarchal cabal could think up. The cost to society is mounting and the legacy of honor earned by the humility and sacrifices of generations of women in the past is being burnt through like a sailor's bankroll.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:22 PM
1

Wow, thanks for this link. Really powerful and thoughtful analysis.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 11:08 AM
0

Truth doesn't give a shit who says it.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 09:18 AM
3

Actually, you don't need to be a feminist to find this practice unacceptable.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 08:19 AM
1

Thanks, and wow, the negativity and one-sidedness of the citations all clumped together like that is really ugly.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:51 AM
1

Oh, I don't know if it's generally used the way I heard it, but I heard it in actual life with my actual ears, so there's that. Oh, and Wikipedia agrees. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testosterone_poisoning
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:47 AM
3

Interesting. I've only heard it from smirking feminists as a putdown of straight men.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:03 AM
18

Saying men are the dominant culture is like saying the positive end of a magnet is the dominant end. It's nuts. I would like to never see the term "testosterone poisoning."
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:40 PM
7

I wonder if nature has provided females with a way to attract a male protector if a father is not present in the family group. Would be evolutionarily favorable.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:13 PM
1

I think women say this not out of any kind of sincere desire to do such things, but more out of feeling naughty that they can get away with it and men can't. If they want to fuck over young boys, there are plenty of more subtle and psychologically sophisticated means at their disposal.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:03 PM
4

The audience for this pap seems to be women who could have had a lovely life in their 20's if they hadn't been full of feminist BS about independence, and now, after they've hit the wall, suddenly "discover" their submissive side, but only in the bedroom, so it's edgy and not just standard feminine submissiveness.
/r/MGTOW05/02/15 03:19 PM
7

Most of these women are powerful and stable enough that they'll just shrug it off. The common denominator of these women is that they're successful through their own determination, and not through social promotion.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:16 PM
1

Well, as long as a few of their girlfriends will go with them, it could be a thing.
/r/MGTOW05/02/15 04:37 AM
2

I hope we see more examples like these. Truth against slander.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:34 AM
1

If your teacher is mentioning her rape in class, and your grade is at all crucial, this may not be ground you want to take your stand on, given that as a male you're already statistically less likely to be viewed favorably by a female teacher. Perhaps if you write it as an inquiry while staying away from any personal attachment to the information in it, merely quoting people and noting the controversy, raising questions about the importance of Men's Rights without trying to actually make that st…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:53 PM
5

She's a very experienced politician, and the veteran of ferocious smear campaigns. So she's going to be very careful what she says. You'll have to look at what she actually does, the people and the proposals she supports.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:42 PM
3

Also, mass casualties are ok if men, and also, if the hero survives and is a male, then covered in blood and usually protecting a female.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:56 PM
3

I see nothing in the article that gives me assurance that the authors are in a position to be an authority on this other than snarkillectual terminology.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:42 PM
2

Cuz politics always makes such awesome art. /s
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:48 PM
7

The videos of Karen Straughan cover the dynamics of this very well...they're interlocking and go deep into our social and gender history on one hand, with group survival having been dependent on the disposability of men, and on the other hand, Men's Rights challenges the fallacious logical and factual underpinnings of feminism, as well as showing women in a less than flattering light, something women mostly avoid like a vampire avoids sunlight. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcmnLu5cGUGeLy744W…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:12 PM
4

Cenk is a decent guy, but wow he had a deathgrip on "common knowledge" of feminism and didn't want that altered. I've watched his show a few times, and he pretty much is a white knight...well whatever color his background is....
/r/MensRights04/02/15 05:05 AM
0

Slandroid.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 04:49 AM
2

Let her persist in her folly.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 01:23 AM
1

Thanks, I'll consider getting my lazy ass in gear and putting something together.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:17 PM
1

I think we may be heading towards a tipping point where the majority of women start to see feminism as a genuine liability and they will start shape-shifting into something that is more appealing to men, if not actually good for them. This will certainly have to be about more than just the availability of sex. The attractiveness of women has consisted of romantic myths driven by horniness/loneliness and the sacrifice of motherhood. Those myths are evaporating, and there's not much to drive the c…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 03:14 PM
23

You know the old meme about it being so hard to buy something for Father's Day that he'll want? Men are more oriented to producing/destroying, participation/isolation. Apart from good tools and functional wardrobe, most are not great consumers, especially of low utility crap, which is a huge portion of retail. Add in how, generally, much easier it is to flatter/seduce/persuade women, and how much more they respond to authority, then removing authority from the males in the family transfers it to…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:04 PM
1

So, lie out of both sides of your mouth, and point at men, so you can get your way, basically.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:11 AM
1

I've been around these guys and this is how they come off: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/b9/87/aa/b987aaf650527906fae23eebf7fea48c.jpg
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 02:51 AM
2

Blather attempting to obfuscate the basic solipsism with which the author experiences this. I imagine she has a deep suspicion of any truly independent action, and a need to control and moderate. Campfire pisser. Well poisoner. Fie.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 09:08 AM
1

I suspect that if she were somehow induced to speak her mind freely, you would hear a lot of misandrist values and opinions. Men on this campus and others will be less engaged with campus life, eventually keeping their heads down and getting the hell out as soon as they can. And the trend of fewer men enrolling will continue.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 08:54 AM
5

The insult in it is the implication that patriarchal society hasn't historically considered women as people. Passive slander, from masters.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 05:02 AM
1

Dressing down helps. Don't look as if you have disposable income at work.
/r/MGTOW31/01/15 05:53 PM
1

This is brilliant and highlights the absurdity of this attempt at control of the bedroom/kitchen/roof/wherever.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 08:06 AM
1

This brings back to me the distaste I felt at watching the film "Shadowlands," supposedly based--debased in fact--on the life of CS Lewis. He is depicted as being bumbling, not in touch with himself, stealing ideas from students, and only finding purpose (!!) when a woman inserts herself into his life with her son. It is so far from being anything like a representation of the strength, intelligence, and fierce and fearless inquiry of his thought and words, that it amounts to a big sentimental wa…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 07:38 AM
1

The Daily Show has never in my recollection, stepped away from feminism--some of the female presenters lampooning themselves in a personal way--but the general tenets of feminism are a given.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 11:33 PM
1

Somehow year after year, story after story, these people retain this crazy faith that shaming, blaming and complaining will get them something worthwhile.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 09:52 PM
1

This means that girls are better at compliance and performing for approval and grades within a structure. How much use is this in a quickly evolving world where information and learning can be grabbed from anywhere and applications swiftly evolve. Perhaps males intuit that school is not very useful these days.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 09:36 PM
1

I do think men are more capable of thinking independently, and so are not as swayed by social pressure to not commit suicide. Reserving that right for oneself allows for greater freedom of thought and imagination as well. It's not privilege...it's strength.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 09:30 PM
2

It feels like we're in a period of legal insanity analogous to Prohibition, and things will get only uglier as a result. Prohibition was enacted to appease the female Temperance Movement and as a result we got gangsters, and the feds actually poisoning citizens. Oh, and NASCAR from moonshine runners.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 08:44 PM
1

I'm wondering about the similarity of shit tests towards males and the way women entertain themselves as frenemies with other women, just because they seem to find it stimulating in some way. If it's a similar dynamic, then it seems really important not to respond in ways that other women would.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 08:37 PM
-1

Porn and fapping gives them false hope.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 08:10 PM
9

Drives them nuts that they can't shut down male cyberspace, no matter how much slander and hysteria they throw at it.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 08:09 PM
3

Also, let's teach snakes to sleep lying in a nice straight line. It's so wrong that they curl up in a circle like that, it offends us.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:34 PM
2

Complaining for sympathy, attention and advantage is a varsity women's sport. Much of the time they go into sex with a much clearer eye and cooler heart than a man, since they usually have a large emotional support structure in their lives, and the average single man doesn't. Rage and blame and claiming of emotional wounding can occur, as you mentioned, if the woman thought she might have an alpha on the line and was fooled; for her this is deceptive marketing, though, of course, no different fr…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 06:57 PM
3

Answered your own question. Equality is a concept, and as used by feminists, it doesn't mean what it means in other contexts, but is rather a buzzword to cover for unearned power grabs, for the most part.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:44 PM
14

Nice to see these points being made, even in such a slight publication as Cracked. Covered their ass by sliming the MRA and lying that sexual dynamics were created by men, rather than as a collaboration over centuries, a dance of active and passive powers.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:42 PM
4

A common denominator in the results sought by feminists is a general deadening of passion, of vitality, a hosing down of eros in general. Was that way during the temperance movement--which resulted in Prohibition, giving rise to both gangs and NASCAR--and it suits unattractive and cranky women just fine if less fun is being had.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 08:17 AM
2

Not nearly enough shelves for mini-figures and models.
/r/MGTOW30/01/15 01:31 AM
0

All powerful tools can be abused if they are not respected and used with skill and learning.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 01:05 AM
35

Yep, let the guys buy the supplies.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:29 PM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:06 PM
1

So, the unspecified prescription is "fighting for our right to be safe," instead of preventing sororities from going and getting shitfaced at frat parties. The unstated solution, it would seem, is to kick out every male student accused of being anything but a gentleman.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 09:38 PM
3

Gots to keep them ladies nodding.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 09:23 PM
5

At what point does her terming him "her attacker" become libelous?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:43 PM
2

Excellent and respectful response. Better than my half-snark remark deserved. Upvote for you.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:08 PM
26

No where on Elaine's laundry list of why she wants to be in a LTR is any mention of what she has to offer, what she longs to give or share with anyone--only what will make her life easier and more comfortable. No mention of what she can bring to the table that offers value to men. In fact none of the things she craves even needs a male specifically to fulfill.
/r/MGTOW29/01/15 07:51 PM
15

Working theory that unattractive women are drawn to the concept of rape culture because they can then imagine their chances of having sex are improved.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:48 AM
13

Fascinating but not surprising that it's all about how the women are getting punished, when the fraternities are also being denied the company of the sororities at their parties. No concern for the guys, as usual. And zero blame for the lying Jackie or the rabid feminists.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 11:07 PM
2

The lack of comprehension about just what an asshole this makes her out to be...well it's kind of astounding. What sort of positive results for herself, for women, for society, does she expect can come of this. Really it's an attitude she's vogueing around with, high on herself.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:45 PM
7

Thank goodness they had three women to manage the thing, so it stayed on message.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:24 PM
7

Well done!
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:14 PM
1

Also, find some men's and boys resources off campus. The more independent from government and bureaucracy the better.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:05 PM
3

EVERYONE who posts opinions with viewership of decent size gets death threats, insults, obscenities. Daily Kos has an archive of the weekly best of these..I'm sure most online pundits can produce the same. I'm willing to bet she's not even close to people who have been brigaded by freepers, radfems, etc.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:37 PM
12

This is gas in her tank.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:00 PM
8

These shows, like most of TV, are marketed primarily to females, who are the apex consumers and who appreciate fake interpersonal drama the way men like wrestling. And of course men are always the straw man to prop up the lame egos of the female viewers.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 11:07 AM
2

Well, don't just blurt. Make your case.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:32 AM
1

Pick your battles. Do not expect HR to side with you. Do not expect the women to be honest, fair, or even empathetic. Be loyal to your paycheck, keep your gonads where they are not exposed, and know that the social weather does not favor a male lodging this kind of complaint.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 02:51 AM
2

Also, I'm kind of interested in the Mutual Assistance Group format that survival readiness types have been organizing. Men in education are definitely heading towards survivalist mode, yes? http://www.livingreadyonline.com/emergency-preparedness/mutual-assistance-groups-bringing-new-members http://readygoprep.com/website/
/r/MensRights27/01/15 11:26 PM
4

If these women really had a sense that what they think and say actually count for something and have consequences, they would not be so free with their bloody jocularity. They seem to have a deep sense that they don't have any power anyway, so they can yammer on safely. They don't seem to understand that this reflects on all women, and further alienates the men that--deny it as much as they do--their comfort and safety are provided by. Mentally they seem like toddlers playing with action figures…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 11:17 PM
3

Actually, the first University, in Bologna, started out as a student guild that formed to address being fucked over for the price of books, rent, and tuition. They got an awesome amount of power and even fined professors if they missed a class. A really useful current model is the MMO guild. They have guild achievements, communications, links to resources, etc. Once enough men get sick of being insulted and ripped off by traditional universities, and even high school boys as well, it seems a sim…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 11:00 PM
3

First let us lie to you about rape statistics and then let us tell you to believe all women.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 07:27 PM
7

I worked for a very successful property manager, who had provided his family with a huge house, half a block from the best synagogue in San Francisco, everything the best of the best. Had a heart attack, and his secretary, who I was friends with, let me know the whole time he was in the hospital he was terrified that his wife would leave him if he couldn't keep them in the same style. What a way to live.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 07:18 PM
12

Traditional higher education is a lousy economic deal, with ever weakening outcomes. I trust men to find interesting ways to gather information and skills, just as they have designed ever more potent and useful online educational portals. I see men forming independent learning guilds, free from governmental restraints, to efficiently and rigorously gain competence in chosen areas, without having to drop one's life and go to an outmoded factory built around a library, using social forms that are …
/r/MensRights27/01/15 06:48 PM
2

I saw this with the hardline communists in the US in the 50's and 60's...cognitively they disappeared up their own assholes.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 06:12 PM
1

This is exactly how losers think.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 06:10 PM
4

Maybe they just couldn't find a control group of women.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 06:01 PM
2

Hmm, what's the german word for "cooties."
/r/MensRights27/01/15 05:58 PM
1

I think I've come to understand why the term "privilege" grates so much in this context. A privilege is something doled out by an authority. The circumstances of one's race, gender, abilities or sexual proclivities are fortunate or unfortunate, and an empathetic and civilized response is to respond to needs for accomodation to whatever degree practicable. But to assume that one's fortunes are the result of some privilege granted by some cultural überparental entity is fairly infantile.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 06:21 AM
2

Good points. Not sure she has the brains/moves for that though. And to presume to have the chops to examine masculinity in video games is a pretty big bet, and unless she has some smart people behind her editing, she could veer into Sarah Palin gaffe territory.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 06:13 AM
5

Well, I say give the woman enough rope.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 11:33 PM
11

We've really poisoned the community well between men and women, and it's not only feminism. It's the pop psychology industry, the marketing industry, the machiavellian strategy of divide and conquer, and the systematic exclusion of non-elite men from access to social power. The price will be high for this kind of social engineering sans any kind of impact plan.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 10:20 PM
2

Her main concern is how this will affect her and her beliefs. Also, disregard for the value of the viewpoint of egalitarianism, as if that's a slight.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 10:03 PM
2

I really really do not give a shit about the social media wars, which seem to be an agreed upon battle by irritating people. Men buy video games. Video games are made to cater to their interests. Men gather for entertaining and inspiring competitions using those games. Many people enjoy themselves and money is made. That's the real, versus conversational community.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:09 PM
1

I'd like to see a count of how many women want to be on page 3 vs how many feminists want it to go away.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:04 PM
18

Yep, crazies everywhere on every topic though. Her big con is avoiding the legitimate criticisms by smearing them all as abusive and crazy.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:03 PM
1

So it comes down to the self-centered "I don't like the Men's Rights Movement" to be the underpinning of her article. Too fucking bad. It doesn't mean shit to the validity of the movement or to this issue.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 09:29 PM
2

So much of the feminist jargon is razzle-dazzle, trying to keep things from being simply seen for what they are. And what most salesmen know and depend on is that it's easier to talk most women into things than men. This is why media is pitched towards pandering to women. Feminism is dedicated to portraying women as independent as men, while getting them special privileges based on them often being pushovers.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 09:01 PM
70

Her definition is asserting that women have no power. Every group has power. Eastern traditions understand that there are both yang and yin powers. Sarkeesian is a potent example of using yin power, appearing victimized, characterizing her critics as bullies, relying on others to punish and abuse for her.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 08:34 PM
1

Did you also post this on r/feminism? What was the result?
/r/MensRights25/01/15 03:52 PM
1

Breathtaking arrogance to assume that they as women have the authority to generate this kind of discussion.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 07:16 AM
1

A lot of potent ideas and powerful movements have started out being laughed at. Pick your battles and your people.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 01:57 AM
6

It partly explains why women are so pandered to in consumer societies...in general they're a much easier sell, and they don't question things as much.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/15 03:07 PM
5

The arrogance of youth, beauty, and fame.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 06:19 PM
8

I'll be interested to hear if UVA sues Rolling Stone for some sort of journalistic malfeasance. I read their applications have taken a dive.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 06:15 PM
4

Girl is portrayed brave for playing a generally well liked and socially acceptable sport.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 06:10 PM
1

Well, there were unrealistic fantasies a while back. The old TV westerns were MGTOW a lot of the time, with the hero riding off on his horse. Then they noticed that men weren't the best shoppers. James Bond used to be, before they gave him a mommy. Overall, the media seeks to reinforce the cultural norms, and a true MGTOW is seen as a rogue, and untrustworthy. They can be depicted as fantasies, but not in everyday life. Kung Fu, the older series, was kind of interesting, with the protagonist a S…
/r/MGTOW22/01/15 09:54 PM
5

They used the word "confronting.." I think the word we would use in the U.S. is "insulting."
/r/MensRights22/01/15 06:19 PM
3

The truth is funnier than shit. The truth will set you free, whatever gender. She's great.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 10:32 PM
7

Judging from earlier Japanese porn, they really didn't seem to be doing that great a job of it in the first place..women acting all raped and stupid and men fumbling like 12 year olds. Didn't seem like there was much pleasure on display.
/r/MGTOW21/01/15 06:04 PM
2

And this is why the universe in its infinite wisdom, created hitting the wall.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/15 04:12 AM
1

The national harpy chorus is poised to give them endless boatloads of shit if they call it rape, so they just avoid the trouble. Same with calling boys who shoot up schools "gunmen," to make sure the NRA doesn't think they're blaming the actual guns.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 10:29 PM
11

Where were the police? Amazing how obnoxious people can be when they know they can call down a shitstorm if they're hit.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 02:46 PM
15

I wonder how women think men will allow them into positions of leadership and trust if the message they get from women is largely that men's concerns are beneath notice and tragedies are no more than they deserve.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 05:36 AM
2

Some interesting links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Monasticism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peripatetic_school http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benefit_society I think the idea of male benefit societies or guilds has a lot of juice for going forward in a world which seems to want to push us out. Avoiding attachment to outside organizations keeps them free from aggression. Early Alcoholics Anonymous was like a mutual aid society, because at the time feminist led Temperance movements were widely…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 05:05 AM
2

If you believe that, Popester, why don't you make women priests, so they can be listened to?
/r/MensRights20/01/15 12:04 AM
0

By that definition, I wouldn't say, would I?
/r/MGTOW19/01/15 11:44 PM
1

They are the most effective fighters for social justice, as well. The brilliance of the elites is to enlist women to alienate men of their social class, leaving women and children dependent on government and the wealthy.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 11:44 PM
3

Exchange "men" for any ethnic or sexual identity and you would have pure bigotry, but it's ok to say about men.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 11:36 PM
8

People in education are not overly represented by courageous people, and the system tends to weed out those who are. They are shit scared over lawsuits and fingerpointing. All part of a long term dismantling of the factory educational system, though. Way past due.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 11:33 PM
1

She did the deed, she can fucking defend herself. He can wait for her in the car.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 11:21 PM
4

In the past, there were monastic orders for lower value men to take refuge in. I think the MGTOW movement has some of that spirit and wouldn't be surprised if some sort of secular version of that sort of support and edification social structure started crystallizing. Edit: I've been checking out the historical phenomenon of mutual benefit societies, and the idea of those for men is appealing. Free-standing, no attached to any larger organization where oppression can be brought to bear, self sust…
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 11:19 PM
5

Thanks for bringing this to light.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 11:15 PM
1

They see society as a patriarchal construct they need to destroy, so they sow chaos with no forethought or compassion. They damage women as much or more than they damage men, especially the top echelon of men, who continue doing as they like, while feminists have alienated and disempowered the very men who used to be the ones to mitigate and protect against the oppression of the elites.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 12:16 AM
1

Disdain for the messenger does not invalidate the message, and character assassination does not win arguments. She's preaching to an ever shrinking choir.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 12:06 AM
2

Positive or not, this joins a daily torrent of articles on how to fix males. At some point they're going to fall on deaf ears.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 11:57 PM
0

How many women would opt to experience rape if they knew they would not be harmed or found out? Very common fantasy.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 07:17 PM
1

Keep snivelling, ladies, it does your cause ever so much good.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 01:32 PM
1

Hold up one person as exemplar of a movement, then assassinate their character as messily as you can. Yep.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 01:12 PM
1

Deserving respect is not a precursor to getting respect, especially when there is manipulative value in withholding respect for the other persons selfish purposes.
/r/MGTOW18/01/15 07:09 AM
1

This sort of stuff worries me, because it's possible that at some point some really harsh male response will crystallize, some secular version of Al Queda...
/r/MensRights17/01/15 12:57 AM
1

They appear to have fucked with the wrong dude.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 12:40 AM
1

Says the largely talentless genetic lottery winner....
/r/MGTOW16/01/15 10:00 PM
1

In a magazine that has enabled this situation over the years...
/r/MGTOW16/01/15 06:44 PM
1

If you don't think masturbating is rewarding in itself, you need training.
/r/MGTOW16/01/15 06:40 PM
1

Dude says men are not amenable to introspection. Turned off soon after that. All the great introspective traditions in history were developed by and for men.
/r/MGTOW16/01/15 06:36 PM
2

Men are practical and innovative. Information is ubiquitous. Sooner or later universities will become hollowed out as cheap, convenient, useful decentralized educational models are developed by men who recognise a university education as it is currently formulated is a crappy deal.
/r/MGTOW16/01/15 06:34 PM
2

I think that, just as women are feeling the freedom to achieve, earn and participate in ways they haven't before, many men are appreciating and using their freedom from being in harness.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/15 03:47 PM
2

Gotta get them women nodding their heads, right?
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:41 PM
1

Perhaps, just as women are glorying in being able to achieve, earn, and participate in areas previously unavailable to them, now we men are glorying in finally being let out of the harness.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:28 PM
3

Masturbation is soooo much easier, safer, economical and efficient with the big bonus of not having assholes of the other gender in proximity.
/r/seduction07/01/15 06:39 PM
1

It's a plot by men to make college seem less cool, yep that's what it is.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 02:30 PM
2

Who do they expect to do this killing for them, because no way will they get it done themselves. I think women, who have been kept out of power decisions through history, are now recapitulating all the errors men have made, rather naively. The question is what will it take for them to wise up?
/r/MensRights19/12/14 01:20 PM
10

I wonder if withholding sex and affection will be in the list of behaviors they will address.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 01:08 PM
3

Men are going to share power when they know it will not be used against them specifically because of their gender. To believe otherwise is delusional, no matter how many sisters agree with you.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:02 PM
2

So, basically all the desert semitic religions descended from Abraham, then.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 05:44 PM
17

How about blaming this one particular dude, who is a terrible human, irrespective of belief system or gender.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 01:18 PM
1

A case can be made that the modern nuclear family is an artifact of the industrial revolution, when mobility was required for workers. When not forced and frightened away from it, people tend to settle in neighborhoods, communities, and tribes. The nuclear family is far too fragile to build a society on, and the results have accumulated for decades.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 07:17 AM
3

Acknowledging that the author has an axe to grind with the left, I think feminism is the real driver of this hysteria, and, indeed, has driven most of the useful projects and checks of the left off the rails into entitled victimhood.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 07:14 AM
1

There is a combination of factors that lead me to imagine an evolved higher education format pioneered by and for men. 1. College has joined primary and secondary school in becoming an environment shaped by and for women. 2. College is inefficient and costly for value received. 3. Educational resources are increasingly not dependent on physical proximity to a pile of books in a building. 4. Men have a history of autodidactic (self organized) learning in conjunction with their projects, and some …
/r/MensRights14/12/14 07:10 AM
2

Once enough lawsuits start draining the coffers of universities for false rape cases, I imagine this will get tempered a lot.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:20 PM
3

Yep, that's why men flock to those crazy checkout gossip magazines and dippy romance novels!
/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:46 PM
8

Who wants a potential rapist coming in through the window anyway...hire more womyns so feminists can request an all female response unit.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:26 AM
1

And yet she probably considers herself leadership material.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:22 AM
6

Her voice raises up and you can hear the little raging girl who got what she wanted by tantruming in the past.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/14 12:22 AM
3

Sarkeesians little kite has been born aloft on the resistance to her bullshit, which she has skillfully parlayed into far more visability than she deserves. Time to make her go away by ignoring her.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 01:58 AM
2

Yep, do all that in good faith and then realize it will never be reciprocated, it will never be enough, and you'll be a punching bag for one woman after another, and you'll find yourself surrounded with breathtakingly self-centered women, because all the good ones won't be there, since they don't expect the world to be everything they want.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 11:38 PM
1

fire the teacher, laugh at the mother.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:49 PM
1

How about a homeless veteran?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:43 PM
1

Wandering into a feminist conversation as a man of good will just signals that you are a suitable target for pummeling. And they wonder why they only get rape and death threats. What else gets through their cognitive armor?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:12 PM
1

Simply put, why would one vote for a party that promotes leadership and laws that are hostile to one's gender? I say we all send $5 a year to both parties so they spend $30 trying to get us to send more, until both parties are bankrupt and we can move things along.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:07 PM
6

Maybe the filmmakers could provide an accompanying graph of comments per hour, with length of each episode, and whether the comment was a single utterance or a string of them. Maybe then they could make a film of a homeless veteran walking for 10 hours and show the comments he elicits.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:09 PM
6

"Stop the Projection!"
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:04 PM
1

If it bleeds it leads. Women bleed.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:53 PM
6

They're down with anything that will get them clicks. Now that the discussion is gaining an audience, they want in on it.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:42 PM
2

She admits she would be out there with the feminists, but since her job pays her to side with men, she somehow has become the standard-bearer for justice. Not exactly swooning with admiration for her, but glad the message is getting out.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:36 AM
5

And who would ever want someone in a leadership position with that sort of attitude? This is a huge problem for democrats and is a big reason why they fail to win so often...a large part of their platform is supported by people who are actively hostile to men and their issues.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 02:52 AM
4

Even if this were true,which, so not: How isn't this in any way the fault of women?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 06:36 PM
2

Another pander-bear flogging his book to women.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 08:28 PM
1

This is the nightmare scenario that is the shadow of the consent regulation. Who can feel completely comfortable having intercourse when the other person can retroactively in their own mind call it rape?
/r/MensRights23/10/14 11:55 AM
1

This is the sound of feminism burning through the savings account of sympathy and goodwill earned by the sacrifices and subjugation of women in the past, and it is a good and healthy sound, because to take an equal place in society, fairness, reason and equity--not calls for sympathy and avoidance of responsibility--will be required to earn and keep that place.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 11:35 AM
1

If one is phobic about sex with males, then that sex will emotionally register as rape. The woman is talking straight out of her anxiety and imagination, bypassing logic and fact completely. The fact that other women give her an uncritical hearing is a failure of feminism.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 11:01 AM
1

I loved her early work...I bailed when she castrated Ged and replaced him with an abused girl, then, in Always Coming Home, visualized a world where women lived in the cities and men lived in camps outside the city boundary. I believe she is sincere and thoughtful, but she represents no viewpoint that has any kind of vitality for me as a man or for the world I want to live in.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 09:33 AM
4

Misandry is not a new thing; it's ancient, I'm pretty sure. What's new is that women have social, political and economic power now, and as the major consumers and the most willing caregivers of children, are pandered to in media and advertising. Unlike male power in the world, which has had centuries to become a bit more sophisticated, the gender bigotry of women is largely uncritical and, probably from being repressed for centuries, can get really vicious. This will probably change over time, a…
/r/MensRights23/10/14 09:01 AM
1

This is moral policing of women by poisoning the well of public discourse. It seeks to shame women for wanting what they want out of men. Women who subscribe to this type of feminism are either opportunists, attention whores, or wrathful losers or non-participants in the arenas of common joyous sexuality and beauty. I say let them say on and be called out, so that eventually the mechanics of their social mischief become commonly known and can be easily disregarded.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 11:13 AM
6

Or, you can live your life in such a way that it's not necessary to characterize people who are not into the things you are as much as you are as mediocre. We'll all be dead and forgotten someday.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 11:36 AM
6

I suspect that at the heart of the "rape culture" philosophy is a phobic reaction to men's proceptivity in general, and a desire to eradicate it from the general culture.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 06:50 PM
1

If you're like most people, this will eventually fade in intensity and become a part of your worldview, and you will act and respond accordingly, much as people adjust to the reduced safety of living in a big city. The hatred is based on fear and a desire for the world to be simpler, which men share these days and even react to in a similar way, wanting mommy to make it better for them, just as feminists expect the state to be a protective daddy.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 06:50 PM
3

I'm detecting some anti-semantic sediment also.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 08:42 AM
3

If feminists are going to make the personal political, they're going to have to face up to it being legal as well.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 04:40 AM
2

The university model is well past ripe for a re-imagining. The idea that people have to go live near information and pay huge sums of money to be taught by grad students is stupid in these times. If I had a college age son, I would do my best to see that he got a top-notch non-campus centric education for a tiny fraction of the price of a major university, focussed on marketable skills and knowledge rather than school reputation, and starting his work life unburdened by obscene debt. I envision …
/r/MensRights22/06/14 03:07 AM
1

In a world that is threatening in so many ways, I suspect that part of the phenomena of such a lot of focus on rape, and in particular male on female rape, is that men are the ones women look to for fixing things, and while so many huge systemic threats loom, this one they can get their heads around.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 04:58 PM
1

I hope this is just trolling, because otherwise there are scores of great men who refute your point.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 12:03 AM
3

Maybe he was thinking of ho moaners.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 02:20 PM
1

Given the state of campus sexual assault rulings, women will find it increasingly difficult to hunt for husbands and boyfriends on campus. Possibly this was the jealious and priggish motive of feminists.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 12:40 PM
1

Um, that is confidential information.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 12:25 AM
1

Master something and become successful at it. You'll attract women. Don't make attracting women your goal, though. What are you passionate about? Find out and pursue that instead of women.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:23 PM
2

Men and women each had their contributions to make, historically. It wasn't tit for tat down the line, but it worked for both genders to keep the species alive and evolving socially. I believe that eventually some sort of balance will be reached again, less dependent on strictly muscles for babies barter. Hype and bullshit doesn't contribute to that, though, which is what feminism trades in. I think what Vi Hart, Tai Wilkenfeld, and so many other amazing young women are doing is hugely more impa…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:10 PM
1

This time around, males will need the chaperones.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 09:43 AM
5

They should not make her work at community service, and hurt her nails . I hear jail is relaxing.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 09:42 AM
1

No? http://polsci101.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/feminism-fighting-for-assimilation-rather-than-equality/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-3I4dCvYEc Also was talking about feminists in the political sphere.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:34 PM
1

It seems that, now women have more power in public life, they are recapitulating all the mistakes men have made in the previous centuries, envisioning gender based fascism, eugenics, and especially socialism. Having not participated directly in those failures, they think that kind of thinking can work because of a real belief in the moral superiority of women. At some point the feedback will be deafening.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:43 PM
9

I just scanned it, but I don't think I saw any mention of reciprocal respect women should offer men due to their differences. As usual, focus is solely on her wants and opinions.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:45 AM
3

Working single moms took the black pill, and need to be praised constantly to keep from imploding from the results of buying into the feminist bullshit that landed them in this awful life.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 11:23 PM
1

As someone with an abusive mother, I would say that many men face the same thing on mother's day, but there is zero said about that.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:39 PM
2

Meh, it's a cartoon. Solidly based in the instinctual impulse to downplay any concern with men's welfare.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 07:04 PM
0

Maybe it's a bell curvey thing, and they could find that women hate other women more than men hate other men as well.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 06:44 PM
2

Wow, that December 7th memorial hasn't aged well. Looks like an old Tomorrowland fiberglass prop.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 05:50 PM
0

Warren Farrell, it was, I believe, that referred to them as genetic celebrities, and we know what round the clock ass-kissing does to many celebrities' perspectives. Imagine that from puberty or even before all the way up to age 35. That's a lot of cognitive warping. This is why I especially admire level headed beauties.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 03:27 AM
90

The disadvantage all comes due when they hit the wall. My mother was a fashion model and full of shit as a christmas goose; when her looks went, she hid out for the rest of her life stoned on prescription drugs.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 08:34 AM
64

One day a year to honor fathers: make it about women.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:02 PM
6

Ripe for editing.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:29 PM
0

Plenty of men would have tried something like that, but they would have probably had the sense to have the dents be approximately in the same place and would have expected to get arrested if their scam didn't fly.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 06:05 AM
2

Well yeah, and the oil producer's lobby has come out against full reparations for oil spills too. It's just business.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:11 AM
2

This is just fine with the people who own and run the world. Letting women alienate the men who might have in the past protected them from exploitation is a winning strategy for the 1%. So women go around crowing about over-representation in overpriced and largely useless university studies, and in crappy high-pressure corporate slogs. Useful idiots.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:56 PM
3

Ignoring how she sells him out later on, but it's ok because another man hurt her one time.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 05:40 AM
3

From Wikipedia: "The lady doth protest too much, methinks" is a quotation from the 1602 play Hamlet by William Shakespeare. It has been used as a figure of speech, in various phrasings, to indicate that a person's overly frequent or vehement attempts to convince others of something have ironically helped to convince others that the opposite is true, by making the person look insincere and defensive."
/r/MensRights09/06/14 05:26 AM
1

I used to work at the postal service, and once I saw a magazine with another piece of mail on top, so that a picture of John Wayne on the cover only showed his eyes...and I was struck by how much pain and sadness was in them. Check out the Duke's eyes: https://www.google.com/search?q=john+wayne&newwindow=1&es_sm=91&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=RUGVU_KxN4acyASQjICYDA&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAQ&biw=1277&bih=627#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=SU5xDfPh3-YVRM%253A%3BdQ1amQrwpZiB_M%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fi.mlquotes.com%25…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 05:11 AM
4

Interestingly, sexist males are depicted as hostile to women, sexist women have an opinion on how they should be treated, but their view of men other than what they can provide doesn't show up on the radar of this study. The huge insult to men about being viewed as nothing more than what they can contribute to women is corrosively sexist; that it isn't even showing up in public discussions leads to a major disconnect in dialogues around gender relations.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:54 AM
1

Raperaperape scene from The Knack: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKKezXv-hkM
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:08 AM
0

/s
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:08 AM
5

This is how you smear by association: Take a horrific crime and stick it in an article with a mention of a recent murder spree and then add in MRM. Textbook example.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 07:45 PM
4

They're like fussy little girls trying to pin all the blame on their brother.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:15 AM
1

There's a lot of denial among the harder line feminists, and my suspicion is that the stuff they rage the most about is the stuff that implicates women to whatever degree in sexual power dynamics. There's such a strong tendency to circle the wagons, even when it weakens their position greatly. Having been around during the anti-war movement in the 60's, I have witnessed the seductive nature of feeling one is fighting the good fight, and a tendency to toss out allies who express nuanced opinions.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:07 AM
1

Go git'm!
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:54 AM
3

Are you the hall monitor here? If not, then, um...no.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:46 AM
7

I'd be faxing them the finger from somewhere in the Far East.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 04:51 AM
3

I'm guessing Ms. Dirks has some strong bias against alpha males. I hope there's an inquiry into this. "[John Doe] fits the profile of other rapists on campus in that he had a high GPA in high school, was his class valedictorian, was on [a sports] team, and was from a good family," the suit quotes Occidental Sociology Prof. Danielle Dirks, who co-founded the school's Sexual Assault Coalition, telling the woman, who was initially reluctant to accuse the man of rape.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 04:45 AM
5

Here's a clue: women do about 80% of consumer spending. http://www.trendsight.com/content/view/40/204/
/r/MGTOW06/06/14 04:41 AM
5

Because men don't even read that type of bullshit article.
/r/MGTOW06/06/14 04:40 AM
3

Just don't try to hold publc conferences about it.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:20 AM
1

Slandroid
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:19 AM
1

With apologies to BB King: If it wasn't for bad faith, they wouldn't have no faith at all....
/r/MensRights05/06/14 10:40 PM
2

"Prosecutor Ms Sati Ruck said: 'It was the boy who instigated the sexual relationship when he slept with the defendant in her own bed.'" No, you dumbass, he's 15 years old and she's 42!!!
/r/MensRights05/06/14 10:23 PM
1

The real and continuing problem is the kneejerk willingness to dispose of any man that appears to be threatening any woman. The rage against mra's is that they threaten this dynamic, which freaks a certain percentage of (well hysteria refers to the is from the latin word for womb) women. They want the world to be Artemis' sacred wood and all men banished as beasts from it at will.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:55 PM
5

He left out a minor fact about the quagmire of Viet Nam pretty much souring people on Men O' Action, coming as it did after half a century of hideous bloodshed. Not saying the response wasn't totally fuckheaded, but that it didn't come out of leftist thinktanks into a vacuum.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:40 PM
7

Even though I think she's coming from ideology rather than a factual and rounded worldview,I would rather have a conversation with a woman as frank as this one than a slippery, slogan spewing, button pushing defamer.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:26 PM
1

http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2014/06/what-do-we-know-about-girls-who-kill.html http://documentaryaddict.com/When+Girls+Kill-11281-doc.html
/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:11 PM
-1

We was promised sandwiches.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:01 AM
1

Someone give him Warren Farrell's email address.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:18 PM
0

So...basic hit piece... wonder who sponsored it.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:56 AM
3

I don't see any closet to come out of. I don't have to communicate anything to anyone. It's not men talking a certain way, is it? It's a very revolutionary act to follow one's own star and any settled culture sees it as a threat. Therefore, as the Tao Te Ching advises: The Sages of old were profound and knew the ways of subtlety and discernment. Their wisdom is beyond our comprehension. Because their knowledge was so far superior I can only give a poor description. They were careful as someone c…
/r/MGTOW04/06/14 04:51 AM
1

If one consciously or unconsciously desires a world in which the other gender has no impact on them--a goal I've seen stated in so many words--then any impact by that gender is unwanted, and if it's sexual in nature, say, natural male proceptivity, then it appears as assault at the least, and on a continuum with rape. To some feminists, there is no acceptable minimum amount of male proceptivity.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:48 AM
1

It seems to me that it's all one system, focussing on the opposite sex and denying participation in negative reports about ones own. The seduction of this kind of sexism is from a desire to escape being implicated.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:17 PM
-1

All ways of putting you in a negative context, so passive aggression. Classic variations on "have you stopped beating your dog yet?"
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 08:45 PM
14

People in general are prone to projecting. Women can get endless affirmation for it from each other, and their natural urge to find the most flattering explanation for anything from kleptomania to the orbit of Jupiter puts projecting on steroids.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 09:54 PM
8

I bet this guy is going to be so disappointed when his screed doesn't get him any sexy times.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 08:16 AM
1

I dunno, which brand? Feminist? Torah? Koran? It can mean whatever you want it to mean.
/r/askTRP31/05/14 08:16 PM
2

Getting attention, getting additional attention, high fiving each other, having meetings, possibly getting more attention, and hopefully looking great doing it!
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 11:04 AM
0

In that case, I'm glad I wasn't any more respectful.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/14 05:05 AM
12

"I'm single, not that attractive, solipsistic, and here are the men I shall blame for what my karma has resulted in."
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 07:59 PM
-4

Do your own homework.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/14 07:54 AM
2

Ah, my mistake. Stand back while I pile on, in that case.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 04:55 AM
1

I"m gonna say awesome/awesome.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 12:15 AM
14

A traditional marriage is a generative entity, producing value for the members and for the community. This is poison to a society run by and for businesses, who seek to penetrate communities, families, and the individual to create dissatisfaction and a constant craving for gratification. Ruthless and limitless market penetration is the real rape culture.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 03:11 AM
7

My point is that since women are the apex consumers in this society, then the media will always slant stories to present them in the best light.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 02:21 AM
8

The customer is always right. http://she-conomy.com/report/marketing-to-women-quick-facts
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 11:45 PM
1

Shaming only works if the shamer has social and/or moral capital. Shaming is like an antibiotic or a pesticide. Overuse results in adaptation. MGTOW, RP, etc. are examples of this kind of adaptation, in my view. Also, unwise shaming squanders whatever social claims to validity the shamer originally had. Feminism is a prime example of this.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 11:36 PM
2

http://www.shrinkyourself.com/blog/7_7_2012/Emotional_Eating_Why_You_Feel_Safer_Being_Fat_and_How_You_Can_Change_it.asp?bhcp=1 http://www.peertrainer.com/LoungeCommunityThread.aspx?ForumID=1&ThreadID=19593 http://www.myfitnesspal.com/topics/show/481029-not-used-to-unwanted-male-attention etc.,etc.,etc.,etc.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 05:22 PM
5

Women - and some men - put on weight to attempt to remove themselves from the realm of sex due to anxiety or even phobias about it. If one has an overwhelming fear of the possibility of rape, then it's easy to see it everywhere, particularly if there is a social agreement about it.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 02:33 PM
51

Heh, lower brain goes...well, no baby in there, let's fix that.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 02:23 PM
4

What goes around comes around, even when it's the other gender, bro. Says every damn wisdom tradition that's withstood the test of time. I fuck a "hoe," I fuck my own soul up.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/14 08:58 PM
1

Invitation to orbit, seems to me. Pass.
/r/askTRP27/05/14 03:54 PM
9

Thank you for saying this. I think much of this is implied in the wiser posts, but it's good to have this perspective clearly stated. Red Pill works for gaining understanding and skills, self-respect and motivation. Not to be used as justification for unworthy motives, words or actions.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/14 03:51 PM
1

Just learned of this term, i.e. the predilection for some women to get turned on by murderers and other types of dangerous psychopaths. Wondering if attraction to assholes is a softcore version of this. What do you think?
/r/MGTOW26/05/14 09:30 PM
5

Bring back those old days when college girls were in shape! http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/61/Women_Basketball_team_-_The_George_Washington_University.tif/lossy-page1-250px-Women_Basketball_team_-_The_George_Washington_University.tif.jpg
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 03:24 AM
3

My vote would be for "To Thine Own Self Be True"
/r/askTRP25/05/14 11:07 PM
3

Predictable leftist pap from Kos. Of course when people realize their oppression, they express themselves crudely for a while, this is basic depth psychology. What isn't included in the smear is the huge focus on self-reflection and honesty, and on self improvement and utility to society that is expressed in the best of TRP posts. I like to think that PUAs, after some success, realize this is not ultimately satisfying and move deeper in to personal goalsetting. Always there will be people who us…
/r/MGTOW25/05/14 04:41 PM
2

Shaming is what people with no power but moral standing resort to. Worthless if the shamer has no real moral standing.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 03:56 AM
3

American soldiers in Viet Nam used to express disgust and disrespect to male Vietnamese, thinking them all girly and stuff. Then got their asses kicked by them because they knew how to be smart and patient and to confront on their terms.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 02:06 AM
2

That's prime ex material right there.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 07:33 PM
3

Unlike a woman, you can actually coldcock this dude.
/r/askTRP24/05/14 06:45 AM
1

I read the RoK's glowing portrayal of the world before Women's Suffrage, all the mighty works and noble causes. Dated the fall from 1918...you know, right after WWI. Notably absent from his picture is how the mighty advances in technology along with untrammeled maleness resulted in a generation of young men dead in trenches with mustard blisters filling their lungs. Also the riches and splendid cultures of Europe that came with the plundering of indigenous peoples around the world, the enslaving…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/14 05:27 PM
1

Kevin Costner has made some terrible movies but some great RP scenes: Waterworld and Robin Hood have some, and Bull Durham as well.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 06:54 AM
1

Just guessing, but if she eventually wins, she's gonna need to spend a fair fraction of her takings on bodyguards.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 03:16 AM
19

If a woman has decided that men only want sex from her, it's usually because that's the only thing she offers that they actually have any use for.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 09:28 PM
2

The "Relationship Expert" refused to call the girls scumbags, rather saying it's a sign the relationship is not on solid ground. That's right--because the girl is a lying manipulative scumbag.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 11:39 AM
1

Bossy refers to inappropriate controlling. If you want to be boss but not called bossy, then earn respect.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 10:42 PM
12

I rent a room in a friend's house. We're both in our sixties. Mostly we just give each other space, and there has been zero conflict or drama in the three years I've been here. No sweating the small stuff, and it's all small stuff these days. No close family living, got the VA for medical, and a 9MM if it gets too shitty.
/r/MGTOW18/05/14 10:54 AM
9

That was in 1988...never made that mistake again.
/r/MGTOW15/05/14 07:18 PM
15

Ummm...my last wife lived in a shack out in the wilds, kayaking out in Bolinas Bay every day with the sharks, dressed in outdoor gear wore no makeup and was fiercely independent--by all appearances. Shortly after I proposed, there were stacks of bridal magazines all over the house.
/r/MGTOW15/05/14 06:44 PM
6

Feminists are such useful idiots for the 1%. There will always be dominant males running stuff, because they just do that, relentless, focussed, ruthless, and driven. No society ever when that wasn't the case. How feminists fuck women over is by turning them against the classes of men that in the past were more likely to fight for them, be on the side of their wives, children and communities, putting the 99% into an animal husbandry model where a few bulls breed, lots of cows produce, and the st…
/r/MGTOW15/05/14 06:34 PM
3

Seems to me that both genders have a nice high percentage of assholes. The problem is that a higher percentage of female assholes want to be in a relationship. It's good for both genders to know what the odds are. Unfortunately, women can disguise their toxicity until after a commitment is made; there are whole industries devoted to helping them do this.
/r/MGTOW12/05/14 02:06 AM
4

Lately I've been contemplating the relationship between MGTOW and traditional monastic life. A life of relative poverty and chastity frees a man from most of the pressures placed upon him. I think the simple living people are addressing the poverty angle. So perhaps we may end up with some kind of secular anarchic monasticism.
/r/MGTOW07/05/14 04:22 PM
7

If telling the truth "ruins" your life, then it was ruined before you even spoke.
/r/MGTOW05/05/14 04:24 PM
5

Interesting that this is on a libertarian website, when much of the issue is that working people have been undermined by failure to organize and demand their government work on their behalf to keep from being fucked over by the system of interlocking rackets laughingly referred to as the "free enterprise" system in the U.S..
/r/MGTOW29/04/14 01:18 AM
14

Both times I divorced it was after camping trips. Being out in nature with my wife made it clear what was the problem with my life. Nature reflects back my true connection with the universe, and once I am out in it for a while, I understand the true scope of my soul, and therefore how tiny the space for it exists in relationship to women.
/r/MGTOW28/04/14 07:04 PM
4

The first list looks like one for a servant, not a lover. Wonder what the upper limit is for pandering to women, and if they will ever wake up in any general way to the way they're getting screwed in with the flattery.
/r/MGTOW27/04/14 08:11 PM
9

The deal used to include a lot more control, honor, and ownership for men, but the contract was unilaterally rewritten. Social engineering with zero impact plan.
/r/MGTOW26/04/14 04:17 PM
15

Single mothers make ideal employees for exploitation in the workplace; trapped, docile, frantic to keep their job. So much preferred over men, who understand more quickly when they're being screwed, tend to rebel, to organize and fight. In addition, in a consumer society, you want to keep as much of the liquid cash in the hands of women, who are the superior shoppers. So it's no surprise that most of these types of articles are flattering to women and dismissive of men.
/r/MGTOW24/04/14 02:16 AM
20

Yeah, after dating jerks for years so you looked good to yourself next to them, your clock is ticking so you're going to find a Forrest Gump out there to provision you now that you're broody. Why would a nice guy want a used up user like you?
/r/MGTOW16/04/14 02:07 AM
10

In short, involved her previously giving me daily advice on my work life, finances and other life choices, then the possibility of a tax audit and her freaking out because she'd been cheating.
/r/MGTOW15/04/14 02:07 AM
16

Women are brought up with the myth that they're somehow wiser, more moral, more practical, etc etc etc and this is reinforced by horny suitors, the media, feminism. I remember the shock one girlfriend went through when she finally grasped that I had more integrity than she did and was honest enough to admit it. A rare day.
/r/MGTOW15/04/14 01:55 AM
-2

Part of the truth behind being MGTOW is being true to yourself. Do that. Don't do work you don't believe in.
/r/MGTOW14/04/14 08:54 AM
2

Carl Jung called addictions "inauthentic suffering;" in other words, a set of problems one volunteers for in order to escape a scarier or more upsetting problem or set of circumstances. Sometimes, even though something is upsetting, it is still entertaining, or more so than staying focussed on slow progress in needed areas in our lives.
/r/MGTOW13/04/14 07:45 PM
1

Women have social power, in my view for several main reasons. First, in a consumer society, women are the champion consumers. Secondly, when they are young, they are extremely persuadable and shortsighted, drunk on hormones and hunger for approval and attention. By disempowering males, the gender that can go without for a long term goal, there is not much restraining or protecting younger women, and immature older ones from basically running amok. Women in the media are preening about how many f…
/r/MGTOW09/04/14 01:38 AM
1

The commonality I see with both Herbivores and MGTOW's is the realization that Yin is powerful. In the past, Yin or passive power was mainly the province of women as well as various stripes of holy men, especially in the East. Since women have learned how to access Yang energy--assertiveness, aggressiveness, driven ambition--there is an opening in the social ecology for men to make their way by accessing Yin. This has the benefit of creating a social space for living without being fucked with by…
/r/MGTOW08/04/14 09:30 AM
2

I had a poster one time, lost in the sands of time, but still it holds true. It said: "The Truth Will Set You Free..(But First It Will Make You Miserable.)"
/r/MGTOW08/04/14 09:19 AM
1

When I'm feeling charitable, I like to think that women have had power in the world at large for just a few decades, and haven't really gotten a handle on how not to be assholes about it in a way that has worked its way into the cultural norms. Also, it strikes me that giving a shit review on Lulu is mainly confessing that the poster had a faulty bullshit detector or low intelligence.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 10:20 PM
1

Still it seems odd, given the predilection of women to sit quietly for hours, without conversation or anyone paying attention them.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:13 PM
1

Typed in "women underrepresented" in Google: https://www.google.com/search?q=women+underrepresented&oq=women+underrepresented&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60.4853j0&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Seems they are very well represented in discussions about not being represented.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:12 PM
1

/s I'm guessing
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:07 PM
1

Says the woman, giving advice to men. :-P
/r/MensRights29/05/13 04:03 AM
1

That's your choice, at least. Or your duty, depending on your commitments.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 11:59 PM
2

Living a great life is the only positive revenge.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 09:52 PM
-2

Wow, if people stop believing in rape claims everyone may have to actually take responsibility for where they go, with whom, and in what sort of costume.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:37 AM
2

Check out this multi-page flattering photo spread of the 18 year-old. http://www.cbsnews.com/2300-504083_162-10016885.html
/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:26 AM
5

Can you imagine if they did that for a young man in the same position???
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:16 AM
1

Short answer: Nope. Shorter answer: No.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 10:28 PM
5

What they really mean is teach men not to fuck unless told to by their domme.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 08:06 PM
27

It's a dependable bludgeon, and they don't care that it ruins the social context for real rape.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:52 AM
8

I have a dick. That makes me a man. End of discussion.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 10:15 PM
5

It's ported from Cosmo...that explains a lot.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 09:04 AM
2

Yeah, AIDS ground it to a screeching halt for me. I was in SF at the time, and everyone was experimenting, so it was a pretty rich gene pool, with no lifeguards.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 02:36 PM
-3

If feminism were a Shakespearean play, it would be named "The Shaming of the True."
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:25 AM
1

I prefer to fuck friends, is why. Did plenty of sportfucking in the 70s, and it was low on joy.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:31 AM
3

One of the most hateful aspects of feminism is when it uses this most noble of male attributes to persecute and harm other men through manipulation and lies.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 12:31 AM
12

Are men so disqualified from talking about our issues that they can only be taken seriously if presented by women?
/r/MensRights19/05/13 08:45 PM
3

"I was quit when I came in here, I'm twice as quit now."
/r/MensRights19/05/13 06:53 PM
0

Getting centered is at least as important as reaching out. I get a lot out of meditation. A meditation practice will allow you to discover personal resources for dealing with life's issues and help you intuitively know where and when to ask for support. It's like finding gold in your back yard.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 06:37 PM
1

Probably should leave that girl alone. Having that opinion of men will allow her to feel justified in treating you like shit.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 06:02 PM
26

So, women are shamed by feminists for wanting to have a family and stay home instead of having careers, and then, where there is fallout and a majority of women admit they wish they had had kids when they were young, then blame men for those choices.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 05:38 PM
8

She's one of HuffPost's stable of femmepanderists: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nina-burleigh/
/r/MensRights19/05/13 01:07 AM
0

Yes, I'm a sexist fuck...
/r/MensRights15/05/13 02:08 AM
0

Why? Because men will buy them popcorn? Or do they think women will come in a clump like when they go to the restroom?
/r/MensRights14/05/13 08:36 PM
1

Thinking back to Mario Savio on top of that cop car when I was a kid, and saying to myself, hmm, isn't this where I came in?
/r/MensRights13/05/13 05:08 PM
1

Fuckin' porchclimbers.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:40 AM
0

Much more frankness and ease about sex, and more ease in general...maybe because I was exotic for them, and possibly a source of a green card..but aside from those considerations, I didn't feel like a suspect for my drives, my interests my tastes..and that kind of prissy teasing I was used to from the girls in high school was totally absent. Just my own experience, and it certainly seems different now, from what I read. This was in the early 60's.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:14 AM
2

I notice they often opt to pick the softer targets. Hey girls, why don't you try this shit with Maher, Teller, or Bill Burr, among others??
/r/MensRights12/05/13 09:17 AM
1

Meanwhile, in an alternate universe...
/r/MensRights12/05/13 08:54 AM
24

I came of age in Japan, while in the Navy...the way the girls treated me there spoiled me for American girls. Never did the dating game afterwards.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:13 AM
23

"What goes through their minds when they write these?" Bigotry is a coin with two faces..one is brutal and the other, like these statements, is sentimental. When you see something sentimental, look for its brutal shadow.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 09:05 AM
1

If the internet had a checkout stand, there you would find the Huffington Post.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 08:09 PM
7

Seems like this prosecutor was a good match for her skill as a liar and defamer.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 12:55 AM
8

She just wants to shut you up. Do not assume good faith will show up for her just because you are arguing in good faith yourself.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 12:37 AM
17

I gather they are quite different cases. "Snipes, whose films include the “Blade” trilogy and “White Men Can’t Jump,” left federal prison after serving a three-year sentence for failing to file tax returns from 1994 to 2000, reported the Associated Press."
/r/MensRights08/05/13 03:22 AM
11

Not one word uttered with concern for anyone but women, as usual with Sister Mary Elizabeth.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 08:46 PM
11

"Vulgar mistake." Wow, that's exactly how I experience illegitimate claims of persecution.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 12:25 AM
5

The original article is plenty fucked up enough.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 12:19 AM
16

So...when men walk out, it's the gender but when women walk, it's the culture? Always an explanation and a search for external causes for women's decisions....
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:21 PM
8

There's only so much projection you can do before you disappear up your own assholes, ladies.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 04:53 AM
6

Feminists are to the Democratic Party what the Tea Party is to the Republican Party.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:16 PM
1

Shes a nitwit, nothing to see here..move along to matters of substance.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:29 PM
1

I can't hate on Kristen, and the song seems fairly non-toxic to me.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:28 AM
7

The market speaks pretty clearly in the game industry. If she wants women depicted differently, she should build those games, not try to shame and snivel at what other people have created.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:13 AM
11

Whoa, if this catches on and gets equalized between the sexes, there's going to be a lot of dudes with racetrack money.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:16 AM
11

Was sarcasm...
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:06 PM
6

The writing is not bulletproof against criticism, for sure, but he makes good points which might inspire further inquiry in an open-minded reader.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:43 PM
26

Hasn't the poor dear suffered enough, deprived by the patriarchy of her kids?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:19 PM
0

Prudes will hide behind any ideology that will cloak their tiny spirits in self-righteousness.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 06:27 PM
1

raaaape! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKKezXv-hkM
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:34 PM
1

I wish you all luck with that. I was still getting carded at 30.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 03:58 AM
-1

Huffington Post is the checkout stand rag of the Internet, and those are usually slanted towards dimwitted women.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 03:57 AM
1

Damn patriarchy...
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:14 AM
1

I, too, was once underbearded..some native american in my background; but something changed in my fourth decade and I've been at least moustachioed and usually beardy since...perhaps the same will happen for you.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 10:41 PM
2

Dear Aemantra, No need to apologize for your gender which has wondrous, admirable, noble and loving members too beyond the counting. And your gender has endured and continues to endure much injustice and oppression. You've correctly identified that it is feminism that is wreaking havoc between the genders and since you've removed yourself from that mindset, you deserve only respect and admiration.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 10:11 PM
1

Sisters be doin' it by themselves.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:11 PM
1

The stat sounds plausible, but I wouldn't trust the Washington Times to tell me that the sky is blue.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:50 PM
1

Inflated self-importance is a natural target for lampooning. There's truth in this humor, and so it belongs in the conversation, in my view.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:39 PM
2

For thousands of years, in hunting and gathering societies, we averaged about 15% of our waking hours getting what we needed to survive. I read about that in my 40's and have strived to emulate it for the last 25 years. Living simply not only gives more time for play and seeking wisdom, but sticks it to the corporations.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:33 PM
1

I don't see how this could be more than another women's feelgood circlejerk...as a man, I see nothing enlivening for men there.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 08:16 AM
3

Translation: You're not an insecure girl, confused like most people in these shifting times; no you're really a brave freedom fighter! It's magic!
/r/MensRights02/05/13 01:10 AM
1

Not their job.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 12:57 AM
2

When a woman drops huge amounts of weight, she is seen as sick and a victim of the culture; when a man is driven to extreme athleticism, and deadly risk taking, it's seen at worst a foolish male behavior, and at best something heroic.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 05:09 PM
1

Added bonus, photo essay on female "body heroes"
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:37 PM
5

She's dependably for biased for women, and her arguments frequently don't hold water. Once upon a time, Salon was a welcome voice for debunking conservative propaganda, but it's worthless to me now.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:31 AM
2

What always gets avoided is acknowledgement of the pervasive belief that men are disposable. It's the third rail of feminism.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:17 AM
2

Yep, and he gets to marry her and fix everything with a smile, worshipfully absorbing her ptsd and always in the shadow of her dead alpha male first love. The quintessential beta male provisioner. Such an honor!
/r/MensRights28/04/13 10:12 PM
2

Even if that was so, should they not have rights?
/r/MensRights28/04/13 12:34 AM
0

You're fully right; none of those young people were parented at all well in this case, and the boys' behavior was horrible. The general community was pretty awful in their various reactions too. Maybe the upshot of the law getting in and among everyones panties is that we will return to some kind of restraint and oversight of our young people until they are adults.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 11:13 PM
3

If you're this sensitive, to a nunnery with you!
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:05 PM
4

So rich how the parents, who let her go to this drunken party, led the charge to railroad the boys. Way to shunt the blame for their neglectful parenting. Yeah, I said it. The parents of a 15 year old should have full eyes on where she goes at night.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 06:38 PM
2

I'm starting to think that Huffington Post is one big troll operation, designed to sucker liberals. Arianna was bankrolled by her divorce from a conservative, and kept his name afterwards; there's a whole section on divorce that has a not-so-subtle 'take him to the cleaners' vibe. And these kinds of female sexist articles pop up just often enough to keep feminist suckers on board.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 05:53 PM
2

Point a finger, three point back at you. Like most ideologies, conformity is maintained by shared projection. And eventually becomes what it condemns.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 05:28 PM
2

If he's willing to stand there with a sign that says that nonsense, then she is in fact smarter than him.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:39 PM
7

"We are the ones who need to say, no, a woman cannot have it all." This is fucking precisely why men are presented as fools, children, or monsters in popular media..to undermine our authority in the home and community to say no consumerism, to corporate hegemony, to union-busting, and irrational ideologies.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 12:33 PM
8

Well at least they didn't post the pictures to the internet and brag. Oh wait. It's ok, though, it's just guys.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 10:57 AM
1

Not menses?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:35 PM
1

You should have summarized..I could barely stay awake for that kind of language for credit when I was in college.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:03 PM
3

Humor is to idealogues as sunlight is to vampires. Thanks for the link!
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:16 PM
1

What, they couldn't find white feathers? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_feather
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:08 AM
42

Unfortunately too close to the mark for some of feminism, as well as some of MRM...
/r/MensRights25/04/13 02:54 AM
1

At a time when I could see a way to neither shit or go blind, some good people reminded me over and over that it's a cinch by the inch and it's hard by the yard. A day at a time is one of the most helpful cliches ever. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_XiffXlDao
/r/MensRights24/04/13 09:09 AM
3

You're making a good start by venting here; take the actions you can take, if not to address the impass you're in, then at least to stay balanced and able to care for the ones you love. This is not a meteor hurtling towards earth; this is you being stuck in a catch 22, and all things pass, if you keep living.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 07:09 AM
1

More often than not, give or take a Dartmouth case or two..heh
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:51 PM
1

What, pray, are these constructive ways we should be handling sexual energy which is sexual, meaning about having sex? Put more people on the planet? Build greater ziggurats? "Should" is a tricky word when it comes to sex and has been the driving force for much warfare, much perversion, and much suffering. Also, as for holding women to standards, isn't that pretty much what they've been trying to get us to stop doing? That leads to the madonna/whore split, and is good for nobody. Not all people …
/r/MensRights23/04/13 11:50 AM
2

"Moral crusade." That's a dead-on characterization of the drive to demonize anyone accused of rape or pedophilia, and to tar as widely as possible, men in general. This is a killer article and I hope the book gets wide readership, because, as he says, the philosophical makeup of the moral crusade matches that of witch hunts of other centuries.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 06:53 PM
3

This is a site that has a whole section on divorce, which has a general misandrist and opportunistic bent.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 06:37 PM
3

More of this. I think a lot of how feminism is going to be tempered and brought into the realm of reason and sanity is through the agency of other women, and I see this as the maturation process for women in the wider roles in society which they have so recently gained access to.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 05:36 PM
7

It's a major line of defense against putting your dick into some toxic person out of need.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 10:38 PM
3

Because rape is one of feminists' handiest bludgeons and they flame anyone that says or does anything that weakens their ability to wield it. This is why they minimize and avoid discussion of the phenomenon of male rape.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:56 PM
5

Trouble with pointing a finger is that there's always 3 pointing back at you.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:22 PM
3

There exists a very potent list of words in the language to draw on, perhaps some varient of these: asperse, bad-mouth, belie, besmirch, blacken, blister, calumniate, cast aspersions on, cast slur on, denigrate, detract, discredit, disgrace, dishonor, disparage, do a number on, knock, malign, pan, put zingers on, roast, scandalize, scorch, slam, smear, speak evil of, stigmatize, throw mud at, traduce, vilify, villainize, vituperate
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:15 PM
1

Interesting how a large proportion of our male movie stars in the U.S. come from Australia.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 04:05 AM
1

It's a rule in psychology that whatever is repressed eventually expresses anyway, usually in cruder and more forceful ways. The same goes for discourse. Men have been shushed and shamed and regulated and taught the female sensibility is the standard for polite society. So, when allowed to express without that restriction, it's no surprise that things can get nasty in places. Sometimes a person has to barf up a lot of angry festering stuff before they can get to their actual truth. Seems like a s…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 12:21 AM
8

Big props to this sane woman. :-)
/r/MensRights19/04/13 11:09 PM
1

A solid, clear, rational and fair statement of values. All respect.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:18 PM
54

Basic life rule: If you refuse to hear and understand the feedback the world is giving you, it will come back later louder and harder.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:43 PM
2

That's a quite potent presentation. Thank you.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 07:44 PM
1

Yep, that's the facts. The article was about the woman's arrest though, and the current link has a large picture of her now.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 04:57 PM
1

that tax number is interesting. I wonder what the split is in taxes paid between men and women in the U.S.? To the google machine!
/r/MensRights18/04/13 06:00 AM
1

As we saw with the conservatives at the last election, if you refuse to listen to other viewpoints, you end up getting some pretty nasty shocks, and eventually the purges get more and more prohibitive of any diversity of viewpoint. I've decided it's the best policy, until I have sufficient evidence otherwise, to assume feminists will not converse in good faith, and so to leave them to their knitting and build out my life as authentically as I can.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 05:56 AM
1

Yep, he has a book on male initiation (may have written more since) called Iron John...good to check out. Also Robert Moore on male archetypes, book called King, Warrior, Lover and Magician...some arrangement of those. Good stuff.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 05:28 AM
2

Relevant video from GirlWritesWhat: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7tFV2Y6Hxk
/r/MensRights17/04/13 11:12 PM
2

Meanwhile she makes big bucks for men in suits, has studios full of men tuning and arranging and producing, on equipment designed and built by men, etc etc. Talking tough while she's sitting on her daddy's lap. The pandering to women is endless and they don't seem to ever catch on that it is pandering, and not real empowerment.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 08:51 PM
7

For some, the red pill needs to be a suppository.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:28 PM
16

But only her husband's picture was featured in the news article I read. edit: the link now has her mugshot. The article in the Business Insider was all about how friendly she was and how fond of animals. Remains to be seen if she will be framed as an unwilling and loving wife doing what her husband order her, or as an adult human responsible for her choices.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 07:08 PM
1

Wow, that's very refreshing to see.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:59 PM
1

So unwanted penetration = broken neck? I have a woman friend who was raped at knifepoint while hitchhiking across the U.S.. She got past it because she understood the risk she was taking. I have another friend whose back was broken in a car accident. He's not doing so well...suicidal every day, always on the point of bankruptcy. I've been tortured, and beaten, I was repeatedly given unnecessary enemas by my mother, who also beat me with coat hangers, and was sent off to military academy and left…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:40 PM
0

Your words, not might. I was thinking more along the lines of going to a party and getting shitfaced without a wingman/woman, or thinking that every area of town and every group of people should be safe; it's just not realistic. Talking about common sense, something that doesn't happen when it's all or nothing. It's not my fault if I get rear ended, but I can have headrests and a safe car, etc.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:25 PM
-6

Now let's list things and behaviors that increase the likelihood of rape.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 05:40 PM
10

This is why they're getting more irrational; nothing comparitively to feel victimized about...and that's the fault of men too.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 05:31 PM
2

It's called Crash and Learn. When you get enough new information that you have to throw out your old cognitive maps, and everything looks alien and kind of bleak, neither fight nor flight seems like a viable option...just got to ride it out, hopefully, like an acid trip, in a safe place with safe people. Props to you and your husband for being good to each other through this episode.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:23 PM
28

Yes! For some, the red pill has to be a suppository.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:00 PM
4

The many rude comments at the bottom of the article don't serve men's rights advocacy well. Sorry to see the wording, though I understand and empathize with the anger.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:58 PM
3

All they need is to have a feeling that there is threat or disrespect..the facts don't matter.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 05:36 AM
0

Eat a lot of starch and cheese at the same meal and the comparison edges into more accuracy, at least strain and pain wise.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 05:01 AM
3

She keeps using that word "patriarchy," but I do not think it means what she says it does.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 11:48 PM
2

The forever alone came first, the poster is just bluster to cover that up.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 08:28 PM
0

It's a tenet of psychology that whatever is repressed will eventually erupt in a cruder and more violent form. The male perspective is smothered and shamed in so many areas of life that it is no wonder that it pops up ugly and crude, and gives rise to shock jocks and pundits like Limbaugh.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 08:09 PM
-1

I guess she only plays smart girls in the movies.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 01:59 PM
0

Applicable: http://markartry.blogspot.com/2011/05/men-look-at-women-and-women-watch.html
/r/MensRights16/04/13 01:15 PM
-1

This is wonderful. As a man and a subscriber to this subreddit, I like to see this here. We get dinged for our rationality, but this is a clear example of how our rationality benefits women as well as men.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 10:18 PM
-1

Massive social engineering project, ignoring environmental impact reports.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:12 PM
5

It's always phrased 'powerful women scare men,' when in fact it's more like they disinterest men. If you take away the historically primary reasons men found honor in being with women, namely protecting and provisioning them as they raised the children, and then take for granted the safety and convenience that the sacrifices of men have provided, don't expect interest from men other than short term pleasure.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:00 PM
4

This kind of campaign has little to do with securing jobs for women who are actively interested in them and everything to do with adding another pinup outfit to hang over an empty collective sense of self that is a result of loss of traditional, satisfying roles in society.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:29 AM
2

I think men should form learning tribes, access the plethora of courses and resources on the web, arrange meetups and conference chats, and find alternate ways of getting accredited. We are emotionally equipped for this kind of hunting activity, and who the hell wants to spend 20K a year to be subjected to feminist bullshit? Let the women have the colleges, then see how much their education gets them.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 10:44 PM
1

This kind of feminism is like those makeup mirrors that help show you in the best light; money, recognition, position, fame...these are the goals of this kind of feminism. Real victims of society usually don't show up in a flattering light, because society now looks with disfavor on the human emotions of pity, empathy, charity, altruism, unless it is for photo ops in some underdeveloped country.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 10:21 PM
2

I did respite work for the county for emotionally disturbed youth while I was in college. Worked for a lesbian couple who had a boy who was diagnosed with ODD, and indeed, he was a handful, right up until his mothers left..then he and I just got on with doing stuff, no behavioral issues at all. He had almost no opportunity to express his maleness at home without it being seen as defiance..and of course it was his spirit that was the problem, and he was unskillfully but very properly opposed to h…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 10:07 PM
4

Our society's failure is that marriage is the only approved way of socializing men, after they have been systematically deprived of the male socialization with male elders that for most of human history was the norm. Any explicitly male organization for training males to be other than cannon fodder is looked on with suspicion and even horror, and promptly demonized.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 09:35 PM
3

Heh, eventually, 100,000 entries and none matches up to women's expectations. If this was a men's site, the word "stalking" would be correctly applicable.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 08:51 PM
1

I'm considering a theory that feminists are an odd breed of redneck...
/r/MensRights11/04/13 01:45 AM
0

Pee on all the bushes!
/r/MensRights11/04/13 01:16 AM
1

The world is never going to be as safe as your bedroom, ladies. If you want to play in it, you need to smarten the fuck up. It's a hard ass world, and men have gone to great lengths to make you safer in it. If you don't want men placing limits on you for your safety, you are not going to be any safer than men out in the world. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 09:35 PM
6

Biz is biz...nobody pays more than they have to...basic biz rule.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 09:05 PM
20

As the saying goes, if all you have is a hammer, all problems appear to be nails.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 09:05 PM
-1

Why does this have to be reported in the language of competitive sports? It assumes a goal that nobody has proven is desireable or even useful.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:43 PM
1

I'm in total sympathy with his desire to move on and be at peace; quite wise, and he's got a good life to focus on; he shouldn't be expected to pick up any banner for the justice system that has so recently failed him at any rate.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 09:32 AM
1

If he's innocent, I hope they take this as far up the courts as they can, to get some real language about protecting the names and of accused in sexual abuse cases.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 04:27 AM
1

They've also been the pawns of the corporations, bringing much less rationality to consumer activities, and being much more docile and less expensive in middle management positions.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:38 AM
1

Unbalanced, ignores other studies. Also, a cardinal principle of business is don't pay more than you have to for goods and services. It's a tough club out there; I doubt if any female CEO would go before the stockholders and say that they were going to make sure their new hires had more than they asked for.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:28 AM
1

Perhaps a civil suit?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:22 AM
3

Turning UofG into another mediocre bastion of female arrogance and slump-shoulder male disaffection. Perhaps the university as it has been formulated is past its prime. Perhaps tribes of learners, self defined in makeup and purpose, connected in the cloud and with frequent meetups will rise out of the wasteful, bureaucratic shitheap of current higher education.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:18 AM
3

People smell like their diet yes...feed an indonesian on In 'N Out for month and, well...that would be a happy indonesian..but also they would smell pretty danged Orange County...heh Miss Irwin mentioned this in a way that suggested disgust, though.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:54 AM
3

I remember distinctly the day my 6th grade history teacher confided in us that black people smelled different. It was shocking that a teacher could hold those beliefs, even in an all white private school. This "joke" has no place in a classroom...a big part of prejudice lives in minimizing the experience of the other.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:14 AM
1

Refreshingly straightforward. No such site with genders reversed would exist long, though.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 12:22 PM
1

Do they mean that men's bodies don't "shut the whole thing down"?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 12:01 PM
7

I can think of one example of men stopping rape, and it has radically reduced the numbers of rapes, at least by strangers. It's called Sharia Law.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 11:21 AM
2

It's the only way I can keep my head from being squirrelly about gender issues. Thanks for your kind reply.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 07:22 PM
3

The closest I have personally come to having a guideline for dealing with rights issues with respect to both genders is to have as my starting point the question: "Is what is happening to this person or group something that should be happening a person, a human. If it is, then there is a place for discussion about customs and roles. If it is not, then it should be ruled out and changes made to keep it from happening, as much as possible.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:52 PM
1

The Tao Te Ching suggests that emptiness is a quite useful thing, allowing space for the creation of new forms and for containing resources. Technology has eased us out of the harness, as well as our honored place in the family. I don't think it is wise to bet against men in the long run. We do have quite the track record with it comes to social and technological innovation.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:05 PM
1

Mob tantrum.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 11:16 AM
1

That there is high grade snake oil.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:31 AM
1

Yep, but you get to call then "human rights," I believe.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:59 AM
3

Why would they even post this buttload of fail??!?
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:20 AM
5

Apparently feminists misheard the advice "pick your fights," as "pick every available fight..."
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:00 PM
5

Gotta pick your fights. Is this one worth it?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:45 PM
8

Yeah, then there will be no more domestic violence, right? http://www.pandys.org/articles/lesbiandomesticviolence.html
/r/MensRights05/04/13 07:14 PM
0

So, basically...death penalty?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 05:20 AM
7

Shorter version of her plea: "Why do you make the nice woman cry?"
/r/MensRights05/04/13 01:43 AM
1

They must think that word has unlimited magical powers. In fact they are rendering words like 'rape', 'sexism,' 'patriarchy,' nearly meaningless. It's like overspraying pesticide or overusing antibiotics.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 12:55 AM
2

It's gamed to produce docile workers, consumers; women and some men fit that plan a lot better.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:08 AM
5

She speaks as a member of the most safe and privileged class of people in history, made that way largely by the efforts of men.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:51 AM
10

I guess she must have been using all that equipment and research in the field designed and built by women.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:05 AM
1

Of course no man has followed through with having sex with a woman he really wasn't into to avoid saying no and looking like a dick...this neeever happens.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 09:30 AM
1

Also, as usual, girls are portrayed as blank slates that "society" manipulates, which weakens the argument completely because, well, girls love to be sexy and to be admired and paid attention to, duh.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:59 AM
1

That's called a forced choice...a standard debate cheat.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:21 AM
1

If you're talking market penetration, then yes. Our culture and communities have been raped of their meaning by the market. Maybe that's why things feel so rapey.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:49 AM
-2

Men get 'er done.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:23 AM
2

Eight out of ten single women probably do more housework than eight out of ten single men. Different values, interests. Also, both my ex-wives were slobs.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 05:14 AM
5

Anyone, man or woman, is a fool if they engage in edgy sex play with a stranger they contacted online or through an ad. Clubs are safer, if the person knows the club and at least a few of the people there. Don't do it!
/r/MensRights01/04/13 05:03 AM
1

She's most audible in the last part of the video, which they didn't show.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:49 PM
3

Mother was filming it, laughing all the while, audible on the original youtube clip, apparently edited in the news segment so that she is not heard. http://imgur.com/r/WTF/XbhdOCO
/r/MensRights30/03/13 06:55 PM
11

How was the boy dressed?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:43 AM
1

Here's the original video, with the mother laughing as she films!!@! http://www.wimp.com/babyedition/
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:17 AM
2

Huge paintball ballots!
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:54 PM
3

Jumped at the chance to smear the MRA...zero credibility
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:13 PM
3

Um, facial expression, body language, avoidance signals. You do know that body language is about 70% of communication? Why would I bullshit about this?
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:16 PM
8

I used to work as a hospice care aide. The first case I worked on, I was up through the night seeing a man through his final hours. In the morning, I took care of all the business for his wife and adult daughters, dealing with transport of the body, etc, running out and getting them food, letting them have their experience. After this 11 hour shift, I went to a whole foods to get myself some breakfast, where I was given the ugly look from various women for being in the store during working hours…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:08 PM
1

Sisters are gonna end up doing it for themselves.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 08:39 PM
1

Just so.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 02:27 AM
3

It strikes me that when women make these kinds of comments--usually with other women around--that it's kind of domme move, a show of power, since there is no polite or dignified way to call them on it. A mild form of harassment.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 07:23 PM
4

Surprise...the species asshole has two genders.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 10:19 PM
1

People who have a myopic worldview and participate in insular groupthink are the ones who can so confidently come out with the most fuckheaded statements, be they femitheist, political, theistic, etc.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 07:26 AM
1

Some welcome sanity right three. Got to give it up for this woman.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 07:14 AM
2

I just discovered her channel yesterday and have been watching nonstop with huge sighs of relief to hear and see an honest, reasonable, fair and brave woman talking about the things I have sensed but suspected were possibly just a male centered prejudice. I have linked her to a couple friends but with silence as a response. I feel like an atheist coming out to a christian community, acknowledging that this woman speaks for me even though in many ways I'm socially progressive.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 11:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter