TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

piar Archive

View 3 posts and 448 comments by piar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

The Ritual is a horror movie on netflix, focused around five dudes who grew up together fulfilling their late friend's wish to go on a wilderness backpacking trip.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 10:40 PM
2

That is EXACTLY the point of community contribution. For example, if you live in a country with socialized medicine/social security, everyone gives a percentage of their earnings to it, so that people who normally couldn't afford medical expenses, could. This is because everyone can end up accruing medical expenses. People pay into a pool, if those people need to access the pool they use it. It is unethical to force people to pay into a pool that they're barred from accessing if needed. You can'…
/r/MensRights19/09/19 10:08 PM
1

I am a feminist, and I like to think that my views closely align with the vast majority of feminists. I do not condemn all men. Based on your second sentence, I think your first sentence is incorrect (specifically the vast majority part). 😅
/r/MensRights09/08/19 06:59 PM
1

It's a facetious method of showing people the flaws in their ideas. pobretano isn't actually suggesting following through on such a claim, but the possibility shows the obvious gap in thinking.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 11:01 PM
1

I have provided a link to a reputable, reliable and unbiased source - wikipedia Wikipedia may once have had those traits, but it certainly doesn't anymore.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 09:46 PM
1

If you haven't already, I suggest perusing the /r/MRRef subreddit linked on the sidebar. There are a lot of references there from solid sources.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 06:34 PM
–

So the issue is that the studio is sacrificing profits to let the writers/director tell the story they want to tell. I know a lot of people complain about the exact opposite - when studios meddle and make their media easier to consume but less compelling. Maybe it's an issue for the studio, but is it an issue that we consumers have to care about?
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:36 PM
–

Even if it were true, there's no obligation for media to kowtow to any ideology's sensibilities. What would the issue be, specifically? I couldn't care less if a movie had no male voices - I just wouldn't be interested in the movie. Is the issue that the studio is cutting out a sizeable demographic they could have pulled in?
/r/MensRights16/07/17 05:29 PM
–

I'm probably getting whooshed here, but there difference is that you choose feminism, but you don't choose your characteristics at birth.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 05:58 PM
–

That is indeed a logical conclusion.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 04:25 PM
–

Others have said the obvious stuff, so I won't repeat it. Instead, I'll speculate that a big reason the project was accepted and you found success was because you gave the TERF the last word. I think if you gave the last word to the egalitarian, or even the naive feminist, you'd have received much harder pushback.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 05:05 PM
11

Mutilation or maiming is an act of physical injury that degrades the appearance or function of any living body. Pretty sure the english language disagrees with you champ.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 02:59 PM
–

Something tells me you'd enjoy this scene.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 05:16 PM
8

hateful I guess it depends on how you think about this word. Personally, I think critique that has rational merit, even if it's agressive, isn't hateful.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 05:11 PM
3

I'd say the same thing I said in my original comment. Why are gender/race only driving services wanted in the market? The irrational fears people nurture are unhealthy for society, but I don't fault entrepreneurs for meeting demand.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 05:36 PM
6

If there's a market for it, I think it's perfectly okay for someone to fill that market desire. Why there's a market for it, now that's the thing I have a problem with.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:28 PM
–

While I agree this is a problem we should think about, there's a thought I've had recently that's causing me to struggle keeping consistency in my views. With the wage gap, we say (rightly) that it's misunderstood because it's caused by individual choices women and men make. With education gaps, isn't it the same thing - people making different choices with their education?
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:26 PM
–

I don't believe you understand the phrase. In this case "trust" means that you give the claim just enough credence to investigate and "verify" its factualness. It advocates making no arrests until evidence makes it clear what truly occurred.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 08:19 PM
–

Listen and Believe Trust but Verify
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:42 PM
2

It's certainly interesting data. I wonder how much the decrease in condom use is due to additional birth control options for women becoming more acceptable to use.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:15 PM
–

The author doesn't acknowledge the cognitive load of other areas of life, such as maintaining and providing finances for the family.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:05 PM
3

Okay, I had never heard of the Tender Years Doctrine before, so thank you. It's always heartwarming when people debate in good faith and are willing to accept evidence. Thanks for being one of the good ones /u/moldyxorange! I'd be interested if anybody had a date for that. I did a bit of digging and found this article which seems to cover quite a bit of the historical context.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 08:37 PM
–

In America, when women got the right to vote, so did at least 5 million men who previously did not have that right. Edit: The relevant point I'm making is that details like this in history are often ignored or misunderstood, and that also likely applies to "having a say where their kids went."
/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:10 PM
1

How cool is that for their age?
/r/MensRights22/05/17 08:39 PM
14

Nope, feminists aren't particularly humanized. But this sub is pretty vigilant about making sure that women are. Edit: They aren't dehumanized either.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 11:10 PM
12

If there's a secret codeword to get out of an unsafe situation, it loses a lot of its "secret" if the unsafe element also knows the codeword.
/r/MensRights12/05/17 12:20 AM
–

Introductiopn: Sexual Paranoia on Campus Since you tend to repost these, I recommend fixing the typo p.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 05:47 PM
2

When being talked to by a man in any situation is framed as harassment, it's trivial to "become a victim."
/r/MensRights22/04/17 06:19 PM
2

Thanks for linking that, quite the read!
/r/MensRights22/04/17 02:39 AM
2

I'm not you, and I wasn't there, but my general philosophy is that we have to be the change we wish to see in the world. I'd lodge a complaint.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 02:04 AM
1

I encourage you to re-read and think about the definition and this critique of it.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 01:03 AM
–

Looks like there are only two removed comments in that thread (if you're talking about the "Unhinged Feminist Youtuber..." thing that was on the top of MR today). The first one is "Someone needs to put a bullet in this lady already." The second didn't have its contents displayed, as it was removed by automoderator. For any posts flagged by automod, you can check with the mods to get it cleared. Based on what you've said the content of the post is, it should certainly be approved by the mod team.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 11:39 PM
–

Interesting. Could you link the thread of the removed comment?
/r/MensRights17/04/17 11:19 PM
2

one right women don't have in the US or Western world that men do? While I agree that this is a right women should have, it doesn't meet the criteria since men also don't have any reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 10:50 PM
–

Exactly, this sub has an absurdly high tolerance for comments. It takes a lot of effort to get them removed by the mods, though frequently posts get downvoted instead.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 10:08 PM
–

Except feminism is literally built on a marxist framework. Not the case for MRM (which has no underlying framework).
/r/MensRights13/04/17 06:52 PM
–

Right, "Feminist" and "Marxist" are synonyms. Socialism is a much more watered down version of feminism.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 06:32 PM
2

His detractors don't care to learn how to pronounce his last name.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:09 PM
0

Just lurking over here, do you have a source for the 40% vs 80% science? It sounds fascinating and I'd love to read more.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 04:59 AM
3

It just passed monkey trials!
/r/MensRights28/03/17 06:19 PM
2

There are some who refuse to give up the label like CHS, but more official, capital-F Feminist organisations like N.O.W. or the academic feminists that control various universities are enemies to equality.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 05:50 PM
3

Corrected the fragment, it was due to rewriting that section a few times. It still sounds to me like you're arguing for different standards of responsibility based on what's between someone's legs. Especially when science can now also allow people to choose which bits they have, I don't see that as a sustainable way forward for society. If one group acquires a new right, it makes sense that we'd look for other groups to acquire comparable rights. Is that really such an "ugly head"?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:38 PM
5

What you're saying here pushes a violation of a woman's right to bodily integrity. If a woman is capable of raising a child, but would financially depend on her partner as a result (as it almost universally does), and that partner is free and clear to say "Fuck you, I don't want a child, so I'm leaving", then guess who has no choice but to get a medical procedure she didn't want. This contradicts your position earlier about how stupidity/mistakes have consequences regardless of gender. The mista…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:17 PM
3

Okay, I'll hold your hand through this. Why is that valid and not irrational juxtaposition? However, many feminists believe in Patriarchy Theory, or even Kyriarchy Theory. These theories are based on the concepts of privilege - male privilege in the case of Patriarchy, and intersecting privileges in Kyriarchy that account for gender, ethnicity and other factors. While there may have been an argument for male privilege at one point in time, many within the MRM do not believe that male privilege i…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:03 PM
3

The logic here works as follows: Women have reproductive rights. Men do not. Women and men should have equal opportunity. To that end, there are two options: (a) Advance men's reproductive rights, or (b) rescind women's reproductive rights. Given the options, the former is better for humanity/society. FWIW we're also arguing for a fair way to allow the father to opt out of parenthood. Doing so within a short timeframe such that the potential mother can weigh whether she can provide for the poten…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:51 PM
–

For many, recognizing the shortcomings and hypocrisy of feminism is a fundamental part of growing to realize the full extent of men's troubles in society. Calling out feminism's bullshit is a necessary step toward progress. It is not a useful movement as it is aimed at holding back real equality. The answers to your follow up questions from before are answered in the sidebar. Edit: As for the "insults" and "baiting", it looks like you're trying really hard to be a victim when there's no reason t…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:42 PM
5

Do you have the same venom for women who don't keep their knees together?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:39 PM
–

If you see that as a personal insult, I'm worried about how you'd take a real one. Indeed, I've laid out the argument for why content like this is relevant. I've led you to water, so to speak. How you interpret the information is up to you.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:37 PM
–

You stated you don't understand why feminism is at odds with men's rights and demanded an explanation as to why. The sidebar's FAQ has such an explanation. I'm beginning to suspect you're being intentionally obtuse.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:26 PM
2

The only argument that should be required in favor of absolving men of responsibility is them admitting they're not ready to be a parent. The same level of responsibility by which we allow women to absolve their parental obligations. It would be anti-feminist to disagree - it's an argument for equality between the sexes after all.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:16 PM
–

I'm bad at internet sarcasm. Here's the link from the sidebar. #4. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:09 PM
–

For many, recognizing the shortcomings and hypocrisy of feminism is a fundamental part of growing to realize the full extent of men's troubles in society. Calling out feminism's bullshit is a necessary step toward progress. It is not a useful movement as it is aimed at holding back real equality. With how often this "stop bashing feminism!" stuff comes up, it's almost like this response should be part of the sidebar or something.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 09:35 PM
–

Seems to me you're cherry picking the worst arguments people make for male reproductive rights. Simply put, women have choices when it comes to deciding to become a parent. Men do not have any choices in this regard. That's fucked up. Since it seems to be an argument you already understand half the point of, consider the notion of bodily integrity. A man has sex with a woman with an understanding that birth control is being used and that a child is not a viable outcome. Through deceit or neglect…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 09:30 PM
4

FWIW there have been some really weird voting patterns in this sub lately. Prior to the election craziness things here made sense. Now it seems like a lot of the polarization/shill/brigade type voting patterns are frequent.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:51 PM
–

I'm surprised at how hard you're getting trolled. This sub usually is (or at least used to be) all about sources. Granted it seems apparent to me that he was stating an opinion, but there's no reason to go so hard at you lol. Edit: From your comment history I now can see why people would go hard at you, especially if you're RES tagged.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:26 PM
1

Disclaimer: I haven't read the article (work firewall blocks archive links) If she made her $40m before she was married, then the fortune should be safe in courts. If it was while she was married, he's entitled to a portion of it. Them's the laws.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 11:29 PM
1

Believe it or not there are women who advocate for Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 06:21 PM
12

What exact "ignorance" is typhonblue perpetuating? Typhon has been a member of this community for years, and has a reputation for drilling through the BS in studies to find the actual facts and figures. She's got a reasonable criticism of the study at hand, and if you don't understand the context of the criticism she seems very willing to explain herself. I'm surprised to see Typhon slandered as ignorant here, of all places.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:51 PM
–

Take note of how language is used here! An innocent question is asked - "could sexism be to blame?" Well sure, it could, we don't know the reason. But once this premise is considered, it's easy to take it as a given.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:50 PM
–

I'm not local, but I appreciate the offer!
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:56 PM
–

Hopefully they address more than stigmas, because it's more than stigmas that impede men from getting support.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:23 PM
10

Thanks for stopping by. While we're exchanging reading material, let me suggest the FAQ from the sidebar. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq
/r/MensRights14/03/17 03:57 PM
3

I have said this before and I'm saying it again. If the movements are to work together, BOTH need to change not just MR. The reason a lot of anti-Feminism stuff is posted here is because of Feminism's resistance to some of the reasonable activism MHRA strive for (eg pursuing default joint custody). We'd love to see cooperation from capital-F Feminist institutions, but so far they've been resistant to reasonable change.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 03:44 PM
8

Holy shit this thread is brigaded.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:25 PM
–

If you spent any time here you'd know that men don't have as many rights as women in the western world. I encourage you to actually stay and see the facts, but if you're going to continue to spew falsehoods like your username implies then I'll just say it - shuddup troll.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:24 PM
7

In an ideal world I'd love to see this sort of thing, and honestly I'm still okay with it. The troubling thing is that we don't see any corresponding charities directly for the invisible over 60% homeless population.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 04:44 AM
–

It sounds like you want more of a critique of feminism than a focus on men's rights, so I'd suggest having men's rights be a smaller part of it and instead focus on how feminism undermines women. Obviously keep some of the men's rights threads intact, but framing issues as women's issues will get your extremely liberal audience to at least hear what you're saying instead of instantly going insane.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 07:54 PM
10

Yeah, I wonder if there are trolls in this very conversation. There's certainly no evidence that our education system is inundated with male-haters. It's not like educators teach with bullshit rhetoric about $0.77 or give their male students worse marks for the same performance. Look, I can be sarcastic too! If you really want to see examples of this, you'll need to look for things like youtube videos and actually watch them, because the media won't cover stories that break the feminist narrativ…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:36 PM
–

They're in classrooms teaching children and college students. There are plenty of examples posted here and elsewhere. Since you've been looking so hard for them online without results, maybe your search parameters are off. Try looking for terms like "male privilege" "#killallmen" or similar catchphrases and see where that gets you.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:04 PM
4

When feminism first started out there was surely similar pushback. It's important to take these steps even if they're hard.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 04:43 PM
1

I don't have a vested interest in this argument. But my point was that such photos may exist but they haven't been publicized to the point that they've been delivered to our eyeballs.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 04:30 PM
–

I imagine that the majority of the photographers and publicists that get viral traction have a narrative in line with the majority of the women's march, so they would want to minimize any publicity of signage like OP's.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 04:06 PM
–

Busy working and supporting our families. :/
/r/MensRights06/02/17 04:41 PM
–

Chalk another one up in the "What good does your manbaby movement even do" column.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 04:59 PM
3

I've seen you mention the state of affairs in non-democratic nations several times here. The vast majority of this subreddit's population reside in democratic nations, and that's where the focus is for the MHRM since western democracies are where men are on worse footing. We're not (as) concerned with the state of affairs for men in nations that do exhibit male-dominated social hierarchies. OP is clearly speaking in the context of whatever western democracy he resides in. What you're doing is ca…
/r/MensRights19/01/17 04:46 PM
8

Since you seem to be here in good faith I'll answer in good faith. A lot of the responses here are skeptical because others before you have not asked this question in good faith, so please take their posts with that understanding in mind. The short version of my answer is that there are three contributing factors in the US (Note that as always in these types of discussions, these statements are generalizations/average scenarios): The education system is built predominantly to favor girls and has…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 10:56 PM
4

QED false rape accusation worse than being raped.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 09:56 PM
–

Any way to request a screening in/near my city?
/r/MensRights16/12/16 08:56 PM
–

The post got removed by mods, but I'm surprised to see the userbase of r/relationships actually express sympathy to a dude.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 12:37 AM
2

it's not really a moment that results in suicide, it's a lifetime of neglect that results in it. Damn, you're right. I'd never really put that together in such concrete terms before. :(
/r/MensRights27/11/16 11:19 AM
3

Why not? More easy publicity! :P
/r/MensRights17/11/16 04:07 PM
–

To all the little boys out there, women are the true victims of war - they lose their husbands and sons.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 06:09 PM
1

Submit complaint to Title IX too.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 02:03 AM
6

It hit the front page of r/all, I wouldn't be surprised if it was removed by admins.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 08:18 PM
–

Average female lifetime income is 23% less than average male lifetime income. That is a true fact and a true statistic. FTFY.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:53 PM
2

If the supply of workers for a particular industry has a sharp spiked increase, what does that do for demand? Does the worker have the same leverage she would have if there weren't thousands of others competing for the same hundred jobs she's interested in? Economics.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:52 PM
7

How does one identify whether masculinity is "forced by social norms" versus "natural biology/genetics at work"?
/r/MensRights30/09/16 11:13 PM
1

I'll echo the sentiments that you should look into whether you have grounds to file a Title IX complaint. The program was created to ensure that people of either sex get fair treatment in academics. Don't shy away from your rights just because you're of the sex that's supposed to "shut up and take it."
/r/MensRights29/09/16 09:28 PM
–

Title is incorrect - consensual sex isn't something an 11 year old can have with a superior.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 01:09 PM
–

I forget which movie it is, but there was I think a DeCaprio movie where his wife hits him and he immediately hits her back, and tons of articles came out about the movie showing violence against women. There were some really good comment sections for those ones. Edit: Yep, Wolf of Wall Street. Gasps in the theater as he hits her back. Talk afterwards of how she struck him first.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 09:15 PM
–

Holy crap, have the shills ever found this thread. 20+ upvotes for misandric posts inside the MensRights subreddit is pretty damning.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:47 PM
20

There are legitimate criticisms to be made toward Feminism. MR can take it overboard sometimes, but my issue with ML is that the legitimate criticism isn't permitted.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:38 PM
1

I can imagine someone desperately trying to draw parallels between scrollwheel computer mice and vaginas to score some HR bux.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 05:35 PM
6

These are the same people who have fantasized about killing off 90% of the world's male population, keeping 10% of the "best breeding stock" around purely for procreation. Tumblr is a strange place.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 02:56 PM
10

"Can I have $5?" "Sure" "Thanks" - go and spend the $5. The next day "Hey, I regret giving you $5." "It's not like I can just give it back." "THIEF!"
/r/MensRights24/08/16 11:29 PM
2

Feminism (with a big F) has taken direct action against equality in legislation. Men's Rights has not pushed legislation through that has a negative impact on gender equality.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 08:09 PM
47

He's refused the label. Just like how you and I believe in equality but refuse the feminist label.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 10:05 PM
1

MRM gives attention to victims of false accusation, calls attention to the issue. Feminist response: "You're focusing on the '2%' exception to the rule that rape victims always tell the truth!" "The problem with men isn't that we think they're bad, its just toxic masculinity makes everything they say think and do bad." Idk. Rereading your comment I think there are merits and differences as well. But I did draw a comparison upon first glance which I think is worth pointing out. Might be worth con…
/r/MensRights14/07/16 05:39 AM
1

Not to butt in on your conversation, but your arguments look remarkably similar to the feminist arguments about ignoring false accusation of rape.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 06:20 PM
8

I like this autocorrect.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 04:57 PM
16

now a days you never know who has bad intentions. That should apply to women too then. There are plenty of stories of them behaving in bad faith and statistics back it up.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 11:37 PM
1

I mean, I think it's admirable that she's using real numbers to talk about the issue rather than fabricated ones. That's how to have an actual productive conversation and address the gap that still remains between various professions.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 09:10 PM
3

What is this? Tumblr personalities being compassionate towards men? I'd written off that site.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 08:25 PM
38

The only thing that is going to make a difference is if men go away and speak to the women in their lives about what they are experiencing. In my experience, many women in men's lives aren't interested in listening to what men are experiencing. Yes, I know it's a switcharoo.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 05:21 AM
11

defend her from the big bad woman FTFY pretty sure, based on username of OP and the context of her fb post.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 04:35 PM
9

That's a really clever truth.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:54 AM
2

"I'm gonna make you a star!"
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:09 AM
2

The evidence is a whole two tweets? Sure the author has an agenda, but it doesn't seem like capital f Feminists care much at all, from what this article says.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:47 PM
1

A couple examples.Right to bodily integrity. Circumcision is performed on many unconsenting infants throughout the first world. Reproductive rights. For men, their only reproductive choice is condoms or not.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 06:53 PM
143

Adding on... More wants: Give men reproductive rights (not taking them from women!) Ensure men receive equal treatment in courts of law Universal suffrage without threat of conscription/selective service People to respect and empathize with one another's hardships What we don't want: Rights to be stripped from anyone Fallacies leading to unjust systems Justice to be replaced by its lesser forms (eg "social justice" overriding objective justice)
/r/MensRights29/05/16 10:05 AM
1

We should slow our roll here guys. This study just counts the use of the words "slut" and "whore" by user-submitted gender. That isn't indicative of misogyny any more than use of "player" or "dick" is indicative of misandry. (Okay someone could probably come up with better words, but the point roughly stands.) If this were to claim that 90% of the instances were male, we'd be decrying the methods used. They don't consider the context of those words, use of such individual words isn't confirmatio…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 05:31 PM
1

We should slow our roll here guys. This study just counts the use of the words "slut" and "whore" by user-submitted gender. That isn't indicative of misogyny any more than use of "player" or "dick" is indicative of misandry. (Okay someone could probably come up with better words, but the point roughly stands.) If this were to claim that 90% of the instances were male, we'd be decrying the methods used. They don't consider the context of those words, use of such individual words isn't confirmatio…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 05:30 PM
1

"I support your right to be my equal, we are equals, and as equals you have just as much ability to put on the water."
/r/MensRights24/05/16 12:25 AM
2

I didn't realize she was such a method actress.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 05:13 PM
28

According to Gawker, like 4 years old.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 10:09 PM
1

I was specifically referring to the title on reddit. Statutory rape is a form of rape performed on minors, so the article got it right. We should be consistent with our arguments, and we frequently call out media that downplays rape of males as "sex" so we should follow our own definitions.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:20 AM
2

We frequently complain about media calling statutory rape of young boys "sex," so this post's title really should refer to the action as statutory rape rather than sex. That said, this 23 year old was a person with rights, and unjustly had his life taken from him. No matter how much of a scumbag people think he is this was not justice - merely revenge - and his murderers and custodians should have the law applied to them in appropriate measure.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 06:24 PM
10

To be punished as a man Are we admitting that we punish people differently based on gender now? I thought we had our fingers in our ears and were chanting male privilege.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 09:12 PM
3

I too feel your pain.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 09:54 PM
13

"You... you just don't understand what it's like to be a woman. What if I ask him to move and he rapes me instead!? Right on the bus/tram because we live in a raaaaape culture." "The last time I dared to speak to a man on the tram, he talk-raped at me since I didn't consent to the conversation he tried to start."
/r/MensRights23/04/16 03:57 PM
13

His post includes context though. Maybe I'm getting whooshed right now, but I thought /r/nocontext was for posts that look bad/weird out of context, not parts of posts.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 04:09 PM
3

Yep, that makes more sense. I dunno if it differs from the proper legal terms, but the colloquial phrase that seems most appropriate to use is "beyond a reasonable doubt." That being the standard used both for accusations of rape and accusations of false allegations.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 04:52 PM
13

who then would go through the same legal process to prove their own innocence. That's not how any of this is supposed to work.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 04:42 PM
0

That's an objectification and/or mansplaining microaggression! /s I'm pleasantly surprised that microaggression has a red squiggle under it.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 04:24 AM
7

More or less. The popular notion these days is that leveraging selective service = political suicide = selective service is "just a formality" and men have the right to vote. But refusal to sign up means (a) lack of voting privileges (b) lack of financial aid for education (c) ineligibility for government jobs (d) up to $250,000usd fine and (e) up to 5 years in prison. So... not much choice but to sign our lives away - our own form of social suicide.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 09:17 AM
17

I did exactly as she did. It becomes inherent to my citizenship. On my 18th birthday I woke up, and BOOM, I could vote. You must not live in the USA. Here men still don't have the inherent right to vote.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 08:20 AM
5

The term "Mansplaining" is being used in political forums by elected representatives, not just twitter. I don't care about twimblr either, but I care about big Feminism and what it's doing in support or opposition of men. And I want to know the truth, not be spun some narrative that supports my worldview. At this point, I believe you have a misunderstanding of what constitutes a civil debate. Despite my efforts this certainly hasn't been one. It takes two willing parties to have a civil debate, …
/r/MensRights29/03/16 04:48 AM
4

Well to answer your question civilly, we pull it out because it's an immediately evident example of anti-male rhetoric [brought into the lexicon by feminism]. I also expressed my civil intent explicitly despite your sneer in the preceding post.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 04:34 AM
4

Oh boy, if only you knew what you were talking about. MensRights commenters love nothing more than a good feminist to rip into - if I was at home I'd post s few of the more choice examples from my notepad - remind me later if you want. What you've done in this thread so far isn't disagreement and disputing claims, it's just bizarre hyperbole. Is this that thing you call "mansplaining"? People perceive things differently, and what you'd call "ripping into a feminist" I'd call tearing apart flimsy…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 04:06 AM
3

I'm more than willing to be polite to subs that are polite to me when we reach out in our capacity as moderators. A couple recent comments I made in LGBT show that. MensRight's has thus far been nothing but impolite, so here I am. Interesting that disagreement and disputing claims = impoliteness. Sorry you've interpreted our skepticism and scrutiny as a slight against you, but we appreciate facts more than emotions here because they're more objectively true. I encourage you to try being a bit mo…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 03:54 AM
0

Taking the infographic at face value, I don't see any bias towards/against a specific gender. Of course there are implicit suggestions innate in culture, but this isn't particularly inciting, right?
/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:31 AM
3

Last I heard only 18% of people self-identified as feminists, and the figure continues to drop. While there are plenty of people who wear the label with pride, they're still a "minority" portion of society.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 04:47 PM
1

So I've been seeing a lot of articles posted about this whole debacle and I have to ask - now that he's been cleared of wrongdoing, why hasn't the actress' name been released? Seems very clearly the kind of thing that would happen if it was an actor.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 03:48 PM
3

Quick aside since I learned something recently and feel like sharing: By population, child-support paying women are more likely to be behind on payments than child-support paying men are. Of course, courts are less likely to order women to pay child support than to order men (which correlates to primary custody).
/r/MensRights29/01/16 10:01 PM
5

Sounds like you learned something pretty important from your college experience! It's a pretty common lesson men learn during undergraduate study. I did.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 11:29 PM
3

That requires reading comprehension, though.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 11:25 PM
53

At least they didn't name him this time.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 04:19 PM
2

Guess I'm too late to the party since it's all been deleted.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 11:16 AM
2

Edit: Welcome to the community. :) I am still left wondering if there is something we can do there that isn't too radical I think giving fathers the same parental leave that mothers get would bring the earnings gap much closer to equal; I don't know how radical that idea is though. I guess the more radical thing is society accepting that men can & ought to take time off to father. (The impact on the earnings gap presumes part of women's earning shortfall is due to the statistical inevitability o…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 04:28 PM
2

they can't falsely accuse me of rape if I'm never alone with one of them. Well, it certainly lowers your chances at least.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 10:20 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/40hqou/lets_just_come_out_and_say_it_feminists_are_insane/cyul5wl
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:28 AM
2

So stop pretending that your anger is somehow more important than anybody else's. Doesn't seem like /u/chavelah is in any way suggesting that his/her anger is more important, just that it's valid. Your comment suggests you think your anger is more valid though.... Shouldn't it be enough that we're all angry together? At least in terms of getting along to fix things more expediently.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 12:36 AM
3

Yes you are, other Barry. Yes you are.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 06:41 PM
5

People forget that there are other things besides respect that one can show to another. Decency is the baseline, respect is earned.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:44 PM
1

thewatchseries works... use adblock.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 04:04 PM
0

I don't see where else you'd rather use a plus sized model. Everyone knows that in marketing, sex sells. You use as attractive a spokesperson/model as you can, which means you use someone healthy. The exception is if you're using the model/spokesperson as a negative example, in which case you want to use someone unhealthy.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 06:32 PM
27

This really seems like an institution holding power over a class of citizens and administrating prejudice against them.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:26 PM
12

Personally, if faced with such a mandate as the one in OP, I'd go through the motions of trying to ban the feminist groups on campus. Most of the time hypocrites won't recognize the hypocrisy, but there's always a chance.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:24 PM
12

"But... but you don't understand! We're punching UP!" /s
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:22 PM
1

My anecdotal experience is quite similar. It's reassuring to know I'm not alone in it. I wish I had included more wide-reaching sources in the top comment rather than just declaring it so, but the sources are out there if people want to look.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 05:39 PM
39

The lack of consistent male role models negatively impacts all children, but especially boys.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 06:39 PM
7

Man, I was actually really looking forward to hearing something positive come from this kind of thing. Ah well, you got me.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 06:38 PM
11

"What you don't understand is that EVERY OTHER SPACE DEFAULT is a men's sub." /s
/r/MensRights12/10/15 06:35 PM
23

Nah, he's just putting in clear terms the state of employment, that men are more often forced to make that hard choice to abandon their families to sustain a career.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 04:13 PM
2

Since it's impossible for women to meet the criteria of "raping" someone (due to lack of penis) the worst sex crime they can commit is "aggravated sexual assault" I believe.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 05:39 PM
2

Understandable, and tbh I didn't actually look at any of the sources. It could be that the 62% was the non-hispanic white population as a whole. Even if it is sourced that way, the population tends to be close to even across gender, so among the population of women it'd still be close to around 62%. :)
/r/MensRights05/10/15 11:24 PM
2

You're losing the context of what the % means. The original stat was "90% of false rape accusations against black men from from <some population> (white women)". So specifically we're looking at populations and asking "what would we expect this stat to be?" It's a reasonable assumption to make that the male population is at lease close to negligible for false rape accusations against black men, so we're primarily focused on the population of women. Of the population of women, 62% are non-hispani…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 11:07 PM
3

It isn't about content at all, it's because you posted in the sub. Plenty of Fempire subs have a list of users curated by bots, that crawl for usernames of people who post here and in other "blacklisted" subs and ban them.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:26 PM
16

You did perfect. What's up with your wife dude? You really need to get things in order if she thinks its acceptable to call you pathetic. You're supposed to be a team, and she's putting you down like that? Huge red flag.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:19 PM
5

Pretty sure u/Vandredd was saying that any time you try to start a discussion about men having reproductive rights, someone barges in and derails with abortion.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 05:13 PM
3

I think someone with her level of privilege would gleefully say something like that in all seriousness knowing they could get away with it.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 06:46 PM
5

The point that really drives it home to me is they even label PUAs that explicitly say "I'm not an MRA" as MRAs to discredit the movement. It isn't just no true scotsman, it's sometimes just false equivalence.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 06:35 PM
6

I've been looking for a few minutes, but haven't found anything. Would also like to know a source - I'm not about to go throwing around numbers that I can't back up like 1-in-5.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 07:43 PM
2

Many doctors fear getting sued, and believe that if they perform a paternity test without the mother's permission that the mother will sue them.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 04:51 AM
7

She said she was 19. He listened and believed.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 06:21 PM
2

Rape is 50%-50% perpetrated by women vs men from the 2010 CDC Report. Domestic Violence is 51%-49% perpetrated by women vs men and nonreciprocal DV is 70% women. I haven't sourced stats for more generic "sexual assault", but I assure you that the "most" you are expecting isn't the real statistic.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 10:32 PM
0

This is a great post filled with a lot of options.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 04:48 PM
1

If it comes down to it, there's plenty of justification for a "men only hour" since men can be just as self conscious/jaded toward women.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 04:43 PM
3

I think if you want to find guys who care about how they look, all you have to do is check how many gyms there are near you and see how many guys are there working out.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:52 AM
5

If we're going solely by anecdotal evidence, then hi. I'm a dude and I give two shits about how I look. I think a lot of dudes, myself included, would have trouble telling that to a friend though.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 11:10 PM
1

Not sure how you can believe it withstands logical scrutiny when it crumbles to basic facts eg wage gap myth. That's not ideological differences - that's people ignoring reality. If you disagree with it, how can you view it as a plight at all? You seem like you have some cognitive dissonance holding two incompatible belief systems as simultaneously "correct" to you. Unless you're attempting to be aristotic here.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 09:09 PM
0

it doesn't have to deal with the same volume of "attacks" women's spaces do Perhaps if its philosphy stood up to basic logical scrutiny there wouldn't be so many "attacks" on its premises.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 07:32 PM
1

Technically, we woman bash all the time. What we don't tolerate is women bashing. Individuals are often shitty people, but we don't let their shitty actions conflate to such large groups.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 07:28 PM
5

Sure, here's a list of sources about circumcision brain alteration. The list of "benefits" you posted is tenuous. Hygiene isn't much of an issue in the first world... people shower daily, and it's trivial to clean foreskin that way. Practicing safe sex is a better solution to all the other listed benefits. Literally the only reason the mayo clinic gives to cut off a piece of someone's body is "now they don't have to clean it." Of course, there are rare cases where circumcision is a medical neces…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:59 PM
3

There are absolutely no benefits to female circumcision, except to make sex difficult and painful. There are absolutely no benefits to male circumcision either, except to make the penis less sensitive or in rare medical needs. While the physical tissue may heal in a few days or weeks, research shows that the excruciating pain it causes alters brain formation for infants - permanently. That's not to mention the hundreds of botched circumcisions that permanently disfigure or kill infant males. If …
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:31 PM
8

Wow, that was hard to read. Well written, but it just hit home I guess. Thanks.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:17 PM
8

~His~ Her source is DOJ stats. Not pre-meditated studies built to prove the hypothesis funded by feminist grants. You probably aren't aware of the user, but /u/JudgyBitch knows her shit.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 12:29 AM
1

It's well documented that men are more successful at negotiating wages/salary compared to women. Odd that this data doesn't show the general trend of women age 18-32 outearning their male counterparts though.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 02:36 AM
1

In this case, I'd think having a psychopath murderer-who-got-away-with-it for a mother would be worse than missing a parent.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:54 PM
1

The typical family in the study consisted of an adult woman, 29 years old, living with one or two of her children in an emergency shelter. At baseline, 30 percent of families had more than one adult present. Nearly all families with two adults present were headed by couples. A plurality of families (43 percent) had only one child younger than age 18 with them in the shelter, another 30 percent had two children present, and 27 percent had three or more children present. One-half of the families h…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:51 PM
21

Voat would be the first choice, though it suffers from constant DDoS attacks lately.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:21 PM
1

You can even speak with a tone of excitement that someone is finally willing to make a campaign for male issues since males have been ignored for so long on so many issues. This.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 04:37 PM
1

In conjunction to supporting men's rights, can a MRA also support women's oriented rights/issues. Nothing is stopping MRAs from also supporting women's rights, and many of us do so. However, advancement of women's rights is not a goal of the MHRM (H = Human).
/r/MensRights20/06/15 05:50 AM
4

Why not "End the Misandry and Discrimination at Australia's Domestic Violence Hotline for Men"? Ending an appearance just covers up the misandry and discrimination, no?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 08:26 PM
19

Thanks for the response. I still disagree - I think it'd be defensible from a legal and moral standpoint (fighting absurdity with absurdity imo is morally justifiable). I think any public backlash would quickly be overtaken by people noticing the sexism. I also don't see it as "taking advantage" of the genderfluid. It's showing the system that equal is equal is equal. Reminds me of times past, when women would write under male pen-names. We applause them now, for an analogous act.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:28 AM
51

Can you explain to me how this would be a bad idea? I'm genuinely asking. How could they justify putting someone on academic probation for having a fluid gender? Since gender is entirely subjective anyway, and college is a time of exploring self it seems like something beyond reproach. This seems like a very intelligent way to protest the system they've created, not an emotional reaction.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:10 AM
2

Mailing a complaint still couldn't hurt. Even if it's over the statute of limitations, it still makes them more likely to pay attention to the issue.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 10:48 PM
2

OP's comparing how bad it is to use a port o potty to how bad it is to sit in the back of a bus. The overall trend would be appropriate to compare to race relations.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:56 PM
2

Not as solid a defense as you might hope. He said/she said in preponderance of evidence cases.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 11:27 PM
2

Check out the top post in this thread - he specifically doesn't call himself an MRA.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 11:56 PM
2

That argument doesn't make sense. You don't make a baby with two sets of the same genitals! In all seriousness though, it's more of a complaint about how single mothers rear their children. In a family with love and role models children have a much better shot. In your specific example, a gay couple could more easily bring their little girl to a extracurricular with a motherly leader, or their little boy to one with a fatherly role model. Single mothers (on average) lack the time/resources to pr…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 04:40 AM
8

You want there to be no deterrent to fucking up? "I could go social justice on his ass like that one woman, but..." a) She apologized after she was wrong b) She got her ass sued after she was wrong
/r/MensRights12/05/15 04:33 AM
4

Your examples are incomplete: If it's 1600 and you're told "you can be a farmer, or you can be a leatherworker. There are dozens of different jobs in the castle, but you're a peasant so only those two are available to you." Not gender discrimination, but certainly discrimination regardless, neh? Of course that argument can also apply to women, but if we're trying to identify whether a group is discriminated against then it's important to call a fruit a fruit. If it's 1600 and you're told "you ca…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 06:07 AM
2

Ahhh, I see. The context of the original "Women were never really oppressed either" wasn't really there for you. It was partially sarcastic, partially using OP's sister's "definition" of oppression to make that statement, then tore it apart.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:53 AM
6

Men were denied the options that women had at the time. Oppression? Or are you still doing your mental gymnastics routine?
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:50 AM
6

How do you not understand that having limited opportunities available to you is exactly the same as being told you can't do a set of things? You seem really fixated on jobs and working. You do realize that being forced to work outside the home is exactly as bad as being forced to work inside the home, right? To use your verbage, men were told (and currently are, in some parts of the world) that they can't do this, that, that, and that becomes of their gender. Its just that "this, that, that" was…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:43 AM
2

While I agree with calling out hypocrites, I wonder where the line is here regarding witch-hunting. I don't think OP has crossed that line, but there's a danger of it if this game catches on.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 08:35 PM
23

If they had a better explanation of what the boys are doing today, something similarly gender-positive, I'd be cool with it. But to have such a nonresponse is pretty telling that they don't give a single fuck about the boys.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:56 PM
2

My mom was a huge influence on me. She was always there for me to share in my troubles and triumphs. One thing I never expected was to get married, but my wife is incredible. After a few jaded experiences I didn't believe I would find a woman I trusted enough to make a legal commitment, but she's one in a million. She genuinely believes in equality and has taken time out of her life to advocate for men/boys in addition to women/girls.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:17 PM
5

I hope it's because that policy clearly indicates that they only work with one gender of victim, and ignore the fact that the other gender has victims too. But IANOP.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:57 AM
3

I noticed and like that comment as well, and it doesn't even include the obvious infant genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 04:55 AM
1

But I think women don't respond well to men that fall apart at the seams all the time. I don't think many people at all respond well to people who fall apart all the time. :) I know I've had girlfriends in the past that were emotional wrecks and it drove me away pretty quickly. But like you say, that doesn't mean sharing feelings is a bad thing. There's definitely a generational aspect to women accepting their man's feelings. I don't know when you're from, but my wife and I are older millenials …
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:52 PM
1

You're stating gender roles for men as though they are unalterable. Yes, there is some basis in evolution for "alpha" characteristics to get passed on. But the question you're ignoring is "why?" As in, why live with those shackles on you? Why bottle everything up? Why live a lifestyle that is actively harmful to you? Why die 10 years younger than your female peers? These are the same gender roles that demand men to give their whole paychecks to their woman. So yes, you're an old dog, and there's…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:30 AM
2

Its what the kids do these days.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:11 AM
3

I saw this post in the "unnamed sub" and read through the replies like these ones. I was curious what happened to the post/thread, I guess now I know. It's a crazy world out there, and people have very biased perspectives on it. I'm happy to see that you're able to move past this, in no small part because you lost her long ago and have already gone through that grief. I can only offer my sympathies.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 08:20 PM
0

Even so, a sample size of 4 is not statistically relevant. It does make for more of a statement, and I wish they had included more footage of it as well.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 03:26 PM
1

Well, my searching has yielded conflicting reports... and since I can't find any actual source material from Voltaire I have to suspect you have it right. Thanks for inspiring me to look for myself; I should do so more often.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 06:31 AM
0

While the quote may closely follow Kevin Strom's wording, Voltaire also had a more verbose quote saying the same thing. And Voltaire definitely said it before Strom did.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 06:00 PM
1

She called you a misogynist because you self-proclaimed you're a feminist. The two go hand in hand.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:38 PM
-12

Confusing feminist=women? Have a downvote.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:46 PM
2

He sticks to his guns very well. Sources in the right places. I wish he had called them out on confusing "feminists == women" and equating his bitterness towards feminism to bitterness towards women. But overall a very good (extremely long) read.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 07:12 AM
2

For some reason in the U.S the police have the idea that they are above the law. It's shit like the 'blue code of silence' that anything was allowed to happen in the first place. If police want people to respect them again then they have to start earning it back, one little bit at a time. You have been shadowbanned Wow, I guess the police are above criticism on reddit. Wtf in your post is ban worthy?
/r/MensRights26/10/14 04:25 PM
2

Let's practice what we preach and wait for a verdict before condemning her.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:38 AM
2

The thing I don't like about "check your privilege" is how presumptuous it is. For example, you mentioned that you've never had to deal with sexual harassment. That it's a privilege of being male. There are a significant number of males who are sexually harassed, but others presume that they never had to deal with this because they are male. Those people dismiss his opinions on sexual harassment out of hand because he is a male, despite him actually dealing with it. Or a male studies the shit ou…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:08 AM
1

I've been noticing your comments here in /MR over a few threads and its my opinion that you're taking the 'anti-feminism' too personally. When MRAs rail against feminism and feminists, it's really three types of frustration rolled into one term. Tumblr feminism. This one is pretty obvious. People who legitimately support ridding the world of 90% of all males and using the rest as breeding cattle. People who have a genuine hatred of males as a gender. People who believe wholeheartedly in Patriarc…
/r/MensRights23/10/14 02:05 AM
9

The wage gap isn't 'proven' by your source. It leaves out many factors, one obvious and crucial one being "number of hours worked." While there is argument for an earnings gap, a wage gap has been demonstrably false.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 01:29 AM
4

But the greatest number of rapes committed against men take place in prison... where they are also done by men. I don't know how much percentage male rape victimization occurs in prison, but forced to penetrate happens at similar rates to penetrated by force ie rape.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 03:45 AM
7

I'm not sure which parts of his post you see suggesting "men to be better than women"?
/r/MensRights18/10/14 05:58 PM
2

To be fair they pay for their own training. How exactly are they doing this if they don't have a steady income? It sounds most likely that someone else (likely a working husband) is on the hook for the debt. That's on top of his obligations to earn a college fund for any children they have, and retirement funds, and mortgage, and etc etc. Heap an extra 100k on all of that for a PhD that doesn't get used.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 05:53 PM
5

Uhhh... mgtow still vote, they just don't get intimate with women.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 03:41 PM
1

Anyone have a no-click of the buzzfeed article?
/r/MensRights17/10/14 02:14 PM
11

Thanks for continuing to cover this story Pierce. I look forward to your comments once the big names figure out how to chime in.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 03:03 PM
25

I got chills reading this. Very exciting to see so many prominent names defending the wrongly accused!
/r/MensRights15/10/14 01:15 PM
3

Custodial rights and obligations are not the same as custodial responsibilities.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:56 AM
6

No, I find it highly more probable that they made that decision based on their own stereotypes and preconceptions.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 02:41 PM
11

I was terrified to have sons. A) Not having one, I had no idea how to take care of a penis (turns out it's actually significantly easier than a vulva.) B) I had no idea how to raise a boy into a man who wasn't an asshole. I was terrified to have daughters. A) Not having one, I had no idea how to take care of a vulva (turns out girls have periods.) B) I had no idea how to raise a girl into a woman who wasn't a bitch.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 01:08 AM
0

The sub routinely hears the opposite, but by presenting the "girls who had sex with rock stars" gender-switcharoo he makes us think about the issue from a different perspective. Most people here have differing views on age of consent policies and what the ideal system is.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:28 PM
13

Thank you for the paragraphs.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 03:43 PM
-2

.... No. Bringing attention to sexual assault cases is okay. Especially doing so using consenting actresses and actors.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 05:44 PM
14

This is exactly the statement about Watson and HeForShe I was waiting for.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:03 AM
-8

Okay, everyone is acting like this isn't what he truly set out to do. As if that detracts from the message he ultimately conveyed. Even if he did scramble to put this together to try to redeem himself, his message is exactly 100% true and we should be supporting and focusing on that.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 03:51 AM
1

Really enjoyed the article up until the end: Rape is an especially heinous crime, and heinously unfair -- it is mostly something that stronger men do to weaker women. How can we pile on an extra dose of unfairness -- by failing to prosecute so many of the crimes? For spending so long saying "we don't have accurate statistics" the article sure does get this statistic wrong.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 04:32 PM
9

Murder requires killing + power.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 03:38 PM
1

Thanks! Quite a well put together site.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:06 AM
2

Anyone have a source for his "1 in 6" statistic?
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:18 PM
9

From the comments: This article is a perfect example of using the straw-man strategy to 'win' your argument. Yeah, lets ignore all the concrete examples of feminist action in the article, like the facts about N.O.W. fighting against divorced fathers. I don't think the feminists calling this a straw-man article even know what a straw-man is.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:18 PM
12

No no no, those aren't sexualized, they're just Male Power Fantasies. /s
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:43 PM
2

Oh, that makes much more sense at least. Thanks, I should read my graphs more carefully!
/r/MensRights28/08/14 01:09 AM
4

Exactly the point I was going to make. In my office the men generally are more tactful and the women are more aggressive. Obviously that's anecdotal but it is an example of behavior differences that might contribute to a trend.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:54 PM
24

I cannot comprehend how they can put a graph of median weekly earnings showing women earning 30% more than men per week, and straight-facedly also put up a graph and paragraph about how the female wage gap still exists.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 02:45 PM
3

Looking through the comments, people have pointed out a lot of issues with the study and how it arrived at the 42% figure. It is very likely not actually that high. It would require a much less biased sample (eg a random one instead of pre-selecting based on what magazines people read) to make a strong claim of the population's behavior.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 01:52 AM
4

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe he wrote a piece where he parodied a feminist article using reversed language. Though it was satire (and was labeled as such at the top of the piece) several feminist sites quoted it and claimed they were true beliefs and thus urged their readers to not visit the page they quoted. This happened a couple of years ago when I wasn't a part of the movement yet, I'm just basing this on what I heard/read a while back when I first heard about it.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:30 PM
3

The feminist idea that someone's body is only their concern always is foolish. Parents do have the right to make decisions for their children Parents do have the right to make decisions for their children. Hopefully they make educated and moral decisions for their children. You mentioned that you'll have your future son circumcised - would you mind explaining your reasoning as to why?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:55 AM
3

My point is that there aren't statistics out there about it because no one is measuring how many fathers are "giving up" on custody. I'm not in a position to survey thousands of divorcing fathers, so I can't generate reliable numbers on my own. You're right that it is hearsay, but there is some common sense behind it.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:30 AM
1

Wow, that's a fantastic counterpoint!
/r/MensRights06/08/14 02:53 PM
4

This is actually a misconception feminists use quite often. Only when men think they have any chance at success will they fight for it, thus skewing the statistic. If men always fought for primary custody they would lose much more than they win - your claim is only "correct" because of the pre-selection of cases. Custody battles are always expensive, and when you've already had half your earnings removed it is hard to afford court.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 02:47 PM
11

I recently got married (to a smart and egalitarian woman), but have had several ... "debates" with some radfems I knew in college. I've repeatedly been told "I feel bad for your wife" and "you should be ashamed of yourself" when I speak out about basic truths - backed up by .gov sources - just because they go against the feminist narrative/worldview.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 11:00 PM
3

Especially since we have no idea where he's from, wiretapping could very easily be illegal and we shouldn't encourage it.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 02:30 PM
18

Or "Teach people not to steal", which we do. We also don't criticize victims of theft, question them unless the story is obviously false, create an environment where the victims of theft feel scared to step forward, imply that it's more the responsibility of the victim to avoid theft than it is the thief's to not steal, etc. (That's where the sympathy thing comes in.) Even though we teach people not to steal, a subset of people steal anyway, right? Teaching a population to not commit crime only …
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:42 PM
28

I should've put "teach men not to steal phones" instead of "teach your friends not to steal phones." That's more accurate to the feminazi verbage. I didn't use any analogy. "You can't expect strangers to be decent human beings" isn't an excuse, it is a fact. Strangers/Acquaintances aren't people you can trust. Therefore when you're around strangers, you need to have your guard up and be paying attention. You're being very dismissive of MRAs on a generalized level. I'm not sure why you have such …
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:55 PM
31

See, MRAs I know are still sympathetic on an individual level, but bring these things up when the discussion moves to "how do we stop this from happening in general?" So the conversation would be more like "Someone stole my phone at the bar last night." "That sucks. Anything I can do to help?" "Teach your friends men not to steal phones!" "Whoa, first of all it probably wasn't any of my friends men I know who stole your phone. Even so, you should try to be responsible for your own property. You …
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:32 PM
5

They've been using the competitive victimhood card unknowingly, at the very least. Look at the typical feminist response to false rape victims: They must suffer in silence, because more victims of rape might come forward if the falsely accused is ignored.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:30 AM
5

Any time you call someone out on hypocrisy you'll sound like a dick, to them.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:09 AM
8

Sadly, it does. In many locations a married husband is on the hook for child support even if it is known that the child is another man's (even if that knowledge comes out in the first two years of the child's life).
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:15 AM
8

But what is the point of raising male issues in a "feminist space"? That could be seen as derailing the conversation. I'm not at all saying men's issues are invalid, but in a space that's meant for feminism, men's issues aren't necessarily the relevant topic. That's why OP's idea, to have a space to bring both gender issues together, is a good one, I think. Most feminists I've come across claim "feminism is for men too!" which for me at least was why I originally tried to raise male issues in fe…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:38 PM
2

You have a very powerful story. I'm sorry you had such a traumatic childhood and I'm glad you came out of it more or less alright. Most boys who go through that would not be half as put together as you sound. I wish I had answers to the questions at the end of your post, but the silence is (hopefully) deafening.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:51 AM
4

Just chiming in to say that I appreciate your optimism. Voices like yours are what pulled me into this movement. :)
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:41 AM
10

These things make people feel unsafe, not just women. Men are more frequently the victims of stranger violence than women. I, a man, ride public transit every day. I would feel very unsafe if someone (of any category) was staring intently at me; and if a person was masturbating during that; or if someone started following me; or started grabbing at parts of my body; etc. Women do not have a monopoly on feeling uncomfortable or unsafe in public.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 03:45 PM
1

Feminist sites have not been classed as hate sites. Numerous MRA sites have. Clean up your glass house before you start throwing stones. Convenient that feminists are the ones who choose which sites are hate sites or not. (Specifically SPLC.) I'm sure all the feminist sites that encourage exterminating 90% of the male population aren't hate sites, because they aren't on the hate map. MRAs may have a glass house, but Feminism has grown so large that it has a glass mansion. Second of all, these te…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:38 AM
4

He was asking a question. Plenty of people aren't educated about other countries' legal systems.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:51 AM
1

Rigor under pre-decided bias doesn't make work legitimate.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:45 AM
2

Where is this printed? My reaction varies greatly depending on the source material - textbook is a bigger deal than a tabloid, for example.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 03:38 AM
2

Since we're talking about grammar: You're* :P
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:25 PM
1

Fair enough; I wasn't inclined to watch it all the way through.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:01 PM
11

So.. this video is misinformed about its very premise. This was done as a prank. If you watch the original video of him asking for numbers, its explained as a prank. Not as a pickup artist anything.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 10:12 PM
8

Bigger movements or not, you could tell in the video that people recognized that the girl stole his wallet. Bystanders saw and did nothing, while they consistently came to the victim's aid in the reverse situation. I guess your point is more people saw the male pickpocket. So if a fraction of the population would stop a pickpocket regardless of gender, its more likely that people would stop him.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:18 PM
5

If enough people have stories similar to OP, maybe it'd be better to create /r/raisedbyfeminists
/r/MensRights12/03/14 03:44 AM
1

Few points: 1) The email was never proven to have come from the CDC (it is trivial to fake a screenshot), and in fact contained at least one serious error. If real, the writer of the email is incompetent to the point that they know less about the study than random people online. 2) The first point they make, about how men made to penetrate are not rape victims, is disgusting rape apologia. For some reason, people who like to quote this email never address how the email spends a large number of w…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:25 AM
9

Here in the states you consistently get women making misandrist jokes while getting offended by misogynist jokes. There's a pretty high level of cognitive dissonance here (and it isn't limited to women).
/r/MensRights13/02/14 06:25 AM
3

Ah. Well from that brief snippet it seems they are more levelheaded (imo) than Fox News is.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 04:19 PM
10

Interesting to see pro-men views exhibited on what looks like local tv.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 05:43 AM
14

Bring on the crazy radfems. Despite their vitriol and emotive hatred, they're literally our best publicity. See? Feminism does help men too. :P
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:45 PM
1

You're saying "this isn't a gender issue!" When the reason people are upset about it is that gender roles played a vital part in the crimes (both of them).
/r/MensRights01/02/14 06:52 PM
1

Consider this: If the boyfriend had come home in emotional distress, would the girlfriend take the car to the carwash to help him? To protect him? I doubt it.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:35 PM
7

Did her boyfriend purposefully try to destroy evidence? Yes. I don't know about you, but if I have mud splatter on my car, I go to wash it. If I have something else making my car dirty, I go to wash it. You can't exactly go driving around a blood-smeared car. Is that "purposefully destroying evidence"? I guess so. We don't know the details of what actually happened, but I know that my girlfriend has asked me to wash her car for her and it isn't a big deal for me to do it. Really, he should have …
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:30 PM
1

That's what this articles says. I remember when the story first came out, articles leaned more toward "she immediately knew what the bump was."
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:24 PM
1

Is the common denominator him? It looks to me like the common denominator is more likely his MR opinions.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 04:10 AM
12

Its in the sidebar. When you include "Made to Penetrate" as rape, the CDC stats come out very close to 1:1.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 06:29 PM
2

From the twitter thread: Remind me when men didn't have the right to vote, own property or have rights to their own bodies? I don't use twitter, but someone should explain that men only got universal suffrage in 1865 (before that they were required to own land to cast a vote). That women were able to own property just as much as men were. And that men still have less rights to their own bodies than women.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 02:47 PM
9

It isn't about both being at one extreme or the other. I think its very reasonable to expect the resources allocated to Mary's Place to apply equally to the basic human needs of both men and women in need. Only once those basic human needs are met (for both sexes) should the luxuries be provided. If that means that Mary's Place can cater to everyone at its current standards then awesome! But its very likely that the standards would have to go down somewhat to support the additional population.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 08:31 AM
5

Which is indeed the point.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:11 AM
14

It naturally expires after 10 years. From what I've read about it, they have a functioning version of an "antidote" follow-up shot that breaks down the "freezing agent" within a month.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 02:45 AM
6

How is this "required" in a marriage? How is changing ones name unfair or a burden to a person?
/r/MensRights09/01/14 01:47 AM
6

Again with the putting words in my mouth. I never called you that. Cool, it sounds like you've been educated about women's rights. Have you been educated about mens? Have you learned about how "rape culture" impacts men (at a level beyond your own anecdotal experience)? Have you learned about "female privilege"? From your tone, it sounds like you don't really consider such things yet.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 04:56 PM
7

There is no gigantic conspiracy to oppress men like you guys like to think there are. Putting words in people's mouths is never a nice thing to do. Society is pretty unaware of how often men are victims of domestic violence. This movie is bringing some discussion about the topic. I guess trolls gonna troll though.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 04:44 PM
32

Saw something interesting in the comments for this article. It suggested expanding the food stamp program to also include education stamps, rent stamps, and possibly others such as clothes stamps. The purpose of which is to ensure that the children these support payments go to are actually the beneficents of the payments (rather than the mothers spending it on themselves).
/r/MensRights25/12/13 12:24 AM
5

Not so. In academia they ban dissenting views by giving the dissenter a non-passing grade. Then dissenters are (a) unable to achieve a degree and (b) academically blacklisted.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 02:36 PM
9

Rape isn't an overwhelmingly female problem. Just as many men (in the US) are raped. Have you even read anything on the sidebar? Besides. Even if you contend that an issue isn't gendered because of who its victims are, if a man is not afforded his basic human rights, it is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 08:42 PM
12

Homelessness and the issues that surround it are overwhelmingly a male issue. C'mon man.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 07:45 PM
2

Anyone can go on a walk to raise money Sadly, some events such as Race for Life are exclusive to women runners. Why? Nooo idea.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 04:27 PM
3

My grandpa has similar hands, and recently found the Samsung Note to be a large enough touchscreen for him to use. Dunno if they have them available to try out, but it might be worth looking into. :)
/r/MensRights30/11/13 05:01 PM
3

That's what I mean though... its not just you they're disrespecting, its your wife too. If you want to be her white knight, you have to make them realize that they should never say such things.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 02:56 PM
16

Make it as awkwardly uncomfortable to the person making the "joke" as possible. Call them on their shit. "You know, threats like that aren't funny. I've been putting up with this shit for years and you know what? I'm sick of it. We're together because we love each other, fuck you for insulting our relationship."
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:34 AM
6

Copied from another comment in this thread: Regardless of what the man did before hand, the combat was over by the time this argument occurred, and a new incident occurred when the woman threw her punch. I see her actions as completely removed from any previous incident as the man was not acting belligerently at the time and she initiated physical confrontation.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:49 AM
12

so far, they have resisted male appropriation: there's no significant equivalent of Bronyism for Beyonce. I didn't realize that people were mad that boys could like my little pony... especially the same people that talk about breaking down gender roles.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 08:29 PM
27

Wow... how is this article on salon? I'm impressed that this is an issue that we and [some reasonable] feminists can apparently agree on. I was amused when the author, after making the exact argument that the MHRM makes, "disclaimered" the article by saying she doesn't like MRAs.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 08:40 PM
3

Seems like a pretty obsessed, mentally unhealthy individual.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:44 PM
1

I didn't see a good explanation of their methodology in determining the statistics, but they did say that in each case, women were making more per hour. That's more statistically sound than the US wage gap myth. Not sure how surprised to be about this since the methodology isn't obvious but it sounds like lots of cases of empowered motivated women and average working men. Whether that's just spin or not, I can't tell. Either way, I'd think that their "equal pay laws" could actually help out some…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 03:02 PM
1

Nope.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 04:05 PM
0

Mods, let me know if this belongs in a different subreddit (rather than this one), I'm not well versed with the other MR subs.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:09 PM
18

How male rape happens in prime time TV: A male teacher is raped by a 16 year old male student. Women are still never perpetrators. A male minor rapes a teacher, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 04:23 PM
21

Sorry you got banned, its a fairly common story we hear in these parts. One of the reasons the MHRM bad mouths feminism (and why you've heard so many bad things about us) is a two step problem. First, radical feminists are actively misandric and fight against basic rights for men. Second, when equality feminists try to stand up against the radicals (Thank you!), they are silenced like you were. This turns feminism from an equality movement into a radical movement. I know you probably have a lot …
/r/MensRights26/10/13 04:13 PM
17

Drunk girl gives blowjob. According to some definitions, you've at least sexually assaulted her. Not that that's what actually happened at all from a common sense standpoint, but they will certainly go at you for it. Unfortunately, the only advice I can give you is to seek out legal represenation.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 06:25 AM
2

"data"
/r/MensRights18/10/13 08:57 PM
7

I was a little annoyed by the popup "survey." Do you think colleges should take rape seriously? After thinking about it for a moment, I actually answered "No." I believe that police and law enforcement should take rape claims seriously, but I do not believe that colleges should be involved in the discussion.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:54 AM
1

Among the things Men's Rights Activists should care about, this is not. If anything, we should be agreeing with them - it promotes agency for women so they have a harder time being helpless victims. Really though, this is such a nonissue that I don't think feminists or MRAs should be spending time on it.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:43 AM
4

This statement gets used a lot in here, and while it is sometimes applicable I don't think the outcry here would be that intense. Sure, some people would be angry but not more than a woman saying it. Most reasonable people agree with some form of evolutionary difference.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:18 PM
3

Don't let her continue believing that 99% of rapes are male-on-female. Take a look at this thread for some serious information so you can educate yourself, then help educate her on the real statistics and how they influence her stance. Even if she brushes it off, you'll come out of it with a better understanding of (a) the issue and (b) her character.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:42 AM
7

Your point is an interesting facet to this "issue" and one I don't have an answer for. I haven't seen it brought up this way, but it makes a lot of sense to ask the question.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 08:00 PM
2

I don't really see this making generalizations about men. She's angry and embarrassed and upset about one particular guy.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:31 PM
27

Nevermind that this script will take 30 seconds to say. :P
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:02 PM
3

He doesn't even look unhealthy.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:54 PM
2

Thank you for this comment. I was under the impression that in most/all states a person under the influence of alcohol is unable to consent. While you're here, why is that such a common misconception?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:38 PM
0

Honestly, it depends on whether or not you believe that a drunk person can still consent to sex. There are people in this sub who believe they can, there are others who believe they cannot. Since this is still a controversial and unresolved issue, its hard to come down with an objective "he cheated" or "he was sexually assaulted." Under existing laws, he was sexually assaulted. But this conversation is in the social realm, not the legal realm.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:23 PM
3

This subreddit is about activism towards changing that aspect of society. This thread in particular is advocating for giving support to men. I don't know your background, but I've seen a few of your other posts here lately and I'd appreciate it if you'd tone down the doom and gloom.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:48 PM
6

It is likely that this thread being on /r/MR is the cause for that... even so, I agree that its only a minority of the comments there that are ignorant.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:11 PM
6

Radical feminists have done a good job of poisoning the well against the MRM. Its pretty hard to change people's minds, especially in an environment like universities where its dangerous for people to critically think.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:45 AM
1

Socially conservative means that you don't believe in having a lot of social programs. Trimming down things like welfare, social security, etc.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:13 PM
10

Is there a reason this article presumes that equality means the worst outcome applies to everyone, rather than the best outcome?
/r/MensRights04/10/13 02:09 PM
6

Its a satirical way of showing the absurdity of the existing situation.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 02:52 PM
14

Also, Bill Nye is cool. Plenty of girls I know think so (My generation grew up on Bill Nye).
/r/MensRights20/09/13 06:07 PM
2

Seriously, listen to caesarkid1, help your brother see the light before it is too late for him.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 04:32 PM
2

Its all pretty good advice (except for throwing away drinks... wtf just watch them if you're worried). I just wish they didn't use gendered nouns. How hard is it to say people instead of women?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 06:00 PM
6

Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "man-eater."
/r/MensRights18/08/13 06:16 PM
2

If it were on my feed, I'd turn the joke around with a "women think with their boobs?"
/r/MensRights18/08/13 06:35 AM
3

Not defending the article or the author exactly, but here's why I think she likes Jen Yu as a character. Jen is a "strong female character" but she has serious flaws, weaknesses, and personality issues that make her character more complex. In this way, though she isn't as likable in the story, one can appreciate the character's existence. I hypothesize that appreciation of the more complex female character is what the author meant.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 05:19 PM
12

Obviously they want the answer to be C), but the first half of it makes it false too. (I believe it is true if you exclude the prison population? But they are people too.)
/r/MensRights17/08/13 05:00 PM
8

On the one hand, I see these changes as giving more power to male victims. On the other hand, I can't actually believe that they'll be listened to despite this part: The federal government has put universities on notice that they need to take any complaint, however little merit it may seem to have, very seriously.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 08:04 AM
5

Where am I saying that I think they should be discriminated against?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:42 PM
1

You're saying I should be deprived of my parental rights because of something I haven't done. I'm not sure I see where he said that you shouldn't have rights. I believe the point being debated here is whether men have an easier time getting away from a pregnancy or if women do. Correct me if I'm wrong. Men's way of getting away from a pregnancy: Cutting off contact with the mother Moving away from the mother In both cases, the father is still made responsible for the child and can still be "brou…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:40 PM
4

Not the person you replied to, but remember the scope of this discussion: we're talking about teenage pregnancies. Often the "men" in this situation are not yet adults. At that age, it is very rare for a boy to want to be a father, let alone for him to be properly ready to be one. We shouldn't be referring to "men" and "women" - we should be referring to "boys" and "girls".
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:33 PM
8

Likewise.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 04:26 AM
3

Unless drugs are involved, I don't think any person can "suddenly realize" such a thing. I believe that people have agency and can be assertive.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 01:36 AM
3

What? Even if everything is going "exactly right" ie a normal date, this publication regards that as acquaintance rape - essentially assuming that the initiator of a date is a psychopath manipulator (or schrodinger's rapist). Sure, it isn't attempting to describe a normal dating situation, but all its wordings point to exactly that.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 01:18 AM
4

You would have to be quite dim not to know the difference between a couple agreeing to be alone together for sex, and a psychopath that has orchestrated consent-less isolation through manipulation. Without knowing a person's frame of mind they look the same from the outside.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 12:58 AM
1

I think that no matter what the job offering is, the most qualified applicant should be the person hired, and that gender should not be a factor. If there truly is a biological advantage one gender has over the other for a particular position, I have no problem with it.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:18 PM
1

"You won't be very happy with me," the principal recalled the boy saying. Its sad that the presumption is that boys will make people angry by reporting crimes committed against them. This remark shows that the boy felt responsible for what a predator did to him. I hope he gets help and realizes that it wasn't his fault.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:16 PM
1

It's the same as in the restaurant industry where a LARGE majority of the servers are female. This lawsuit actually sets a reasonable precedent that the restaurant industry's discrimination isn't lawful. Sure it might not be an issue you care about as much, but it is an issue that affects men. Especially for men who are unemployed, getting a fair shake in the job market is a very important issue.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:06 PM
21

Not everyone chooses their sexual orientation, but I think its quite possible for someone to choose to go against their default until it becomes "normal" for them. (Let the downvotes fly)
/r/MensRights30/06/13 07:30 PM
5

Yeah, this is clearly a troll post. This post is sponsored, meaning that someone paid to have this appear to people under the MensRights banner. Its just another pathetic attempt to make MensRights look petty, when really its a helpful subreddit for men who are victims.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:07 PM
12

Its... right in the articles in the OP?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:26 PM
2

No source?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:43 PM
1

Great post.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 11:43 PM
1

You. I like you.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:43 PM
7

Here's an anecdote from my life that agrees with this hypothesis. I'm very skilled in math, and have been a tutor for coming up on 10 years. I have repeatedly been told by my students (young and old) that I am very good at it, and that they wish I was a teacher. If I felt like teaching positions would be fair to me, and not pose a legal risk, I would love to be a teacher. I think it would be a very rewarding career. But the fact of the matter is that I'd be a man working with children, and its j…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:38 AM
4

An excellent article, does not divert from the issues when the topic gets heavy. Does not pander to the "women still have it worse, but..." crowd.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 04:51 PM
4

do any of you accept that rape is a particularly emotionally traumatic crime Yes. the victims of this crime deserve special treatment within the legal system because of their vulnerability as well as the general lack of awareness and understanding within society of the issues surrounding sexual abuse/rape/harassment? What do you mean by special treatment? If you mean that our legal system should be gentle with victims and treat them with respect and dignity, then certainly. If by special treatme…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 04:23 PM
3

Thanks. I'll definitely need to get a lawyer involved in drafting mine up to make sure all my bases are covered, but this is helpful in giving me reasonable expectations.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:01 PM
11

Since you seem to know much more than I on this subject, can I ask you a question or two? It makes sense that you can't waive child support, but can you have a clause that either regulates how child support is doled out (ie proportional to visitation or something)? Can you have a clause that mitigates such payments (ie in ADDITION to state-mandated child support payments, the custodial parent will pay the noncustodial parent some amount)?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:36 PM
9

Others may know that, but I believe that these people aren't lucidly aware of the unreality, and instead have themselves convinced that contradicting viewpoints are oppressive and that oppression means censorship is necessary.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 06:25 PM
3

This post is the perfect copy-pasta to so many MRSocial issues. I wish I had more upvotes to give.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:25 AM
3

While currently true, if it was actually protected as a sport there would be more oversight and injuries would be reduced.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 06:42 PM
2

Posts like this one are a great reminder to this community that we cannot be careless with generalizations. Too often posts and comments in this subreddit put words in the mouths of all women, eg "women are psycho golddiggers." We do the same with the label feminist. While some population of women are as crazy as such posts say, we should remember to append asterisks to them. And gigglymexicans' post is a reminder of that.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:56 PM
1

Sorry for that last sentence, it was rude of me to put words in your mouth. Religion might be viewed differently, but it doesn't detract from my point; you still have specific populations of the university being "attacked" by words and ideas. This is an argument I would give after being told that such a topic cannot be discussed.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 06:11 PM
6

I don't know about your collegiate experience, but on my college's campus there were Atheism discussions that spewed verbal venom at Christianity, and Christians that soap boxed that Atheists are going to hell. Both are attacks on a specific population of the university, yet were accepted as free speech. It sounds like you prefer such events to not occur?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:58 PM
9

If he has the talking points to back it up, I could understand phrasing it that way. He did so for shock value, to draw in a crowd.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:59 PM
1

Or she said that phrase to whoever she was on the phone with. There are times when lip reading is hard, but that phrase is pretty much unmistakable.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:45 PM
5

If people want to post this everywhere, post both versions together everywhere.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:30 AM
3

There is a time and place for sarcasm. Downvoted for being not that time/place.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:28 PM
3

It is very possible for men to be sexist towards men. Sexism is not limited to discrimination against the other gender.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:14 AM
11

I just sent this message: To whom it may concern, I noticed your campaign and visited your initiative explanation page. I found it very empowering and a definite step in the right direction towards ending violence. However, I was conflicted when I noticed your note regarding violence perpetrated against men. Here is your exact note on the subject, with my own emphasis added: "Please note: We use the term she/her when referring to the person being abused and he/him when referring to the abuser. T…
/r/MensRights04/02/13 01:29 AM
10

Please note: We use the term she/her when referring to the person being abused and he/him when referring to the abuser. This is because by far the vast majority of sexual and intimate partner violence is perpetrated by men against women. We do wish to acknowledge that men can and have been victimized by women and that violence and abuse in the context of same sex relationships is also a reality. Someone should refer them to the true (government census data backed more-valid-than-anecdotal-women'…
/r/MensRights04/02/13 01:01 AM
0

So by that logic, the lesson is that girls are better than boys? That's just as bad.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 09:42 PM
13

Respecting women is all well and good, but she's also teaching the young girls to disrespect men.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:36 PM
1

To some extent I agree with you, but when gender discussions happen (which as an MRA is something that will come up) feminists are quick to speak up and defend their misguided views. I don't think MRAs are specifically seeking to "attack feminists," rather they are seeking to raise awareness of issues that feminists want to quiet, and MRAs aren't backing down as quickly as they used to.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:47 AM
74

Critics of women in combat argue that culturally, the prospect of women being drafted might make the country reluctant to go to war. This is the kind of disposability we're up against. The Pentagon's decision is definitely a win for the MRM. Perhaps we'll even get selective service revisited as a whole, but they won't be able to limit it by sex any longer.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:51 AM
5

it made me feel for the first time, in a very, very long time, ashamed to be a woman No point to that. There are plenty of disgusting people on both sides of the gender line; other people's actions don't speak for you. People say this kind of thing a lot (I did frequently when I was younger) but really there's no point in letting crazies make you feel ashamed about a part of yourself - especially something like gender that we don't have control over.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:52 PM
1

Where did you go to college?
/r/MensRights09/11/12 11:00 PM
14

but the reality is that you're actually harassing them over a personal slight. And they're harassing him over his genitalia.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 07:15 PM
1

Years ago feminism was a different creature than its current form. Still, good on her!
/r/MensRights03/11/12 06:51 PM
1

It's exactly the same as holding your arm in a bucket of ice water. And it is the only way social change can happen. Your analogy kind of broke down there. I think.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 06:47 PM
48

The posters all say "It starts somewhere. Know the signs." It implies that such things are early indicators for domestic violence, whether it is emotional/psychological/physical. At least that's how I read it.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 05:58 PM
1

Ever since 6th grade (10 years old) I had to fight to stay in advanced level maths courses. My teachers throughout middle school and high school would constantly say "just take a normal path" and I had to go through a lot of talking with administration to get accepted into advanced courses. Now I'm graduated from university with a major in math. It isn't that I lacked encouragement to get into STEM, I was actively discouraged from doing so, but did it anyway.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:42 AM
4

Or quotas for homeless women.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 11:25 PM
18

I always read that as "Fuck That Fuck You." It makes everyone seem much more aggressive.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 04:49 PM
6

Likewise.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 01:40 PM
20

You might try out the more recent and much more reasonable /r/womens_rights. While I can't stand listening to radical feminists, that sub is modeled after this one and is very reasonable. Still in its infancy in content, though.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:13 PM
1

None of the positions OP is referring to are "skilled professions," and students at that level do not have the education/experience enough to qualify for such skilled professions. You're right in general, but your evidence does not pertain to the particulars of the discussion.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:38 AM
9

In most parts of the civilized world.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:05 AM
1

Do you think men have a higher statistical 'chance' of being raped than women? The only credible sources I've seen show that the rate is roughly 50-50 in the general population. (That's based on the CDC reports.) Though I believe male victims are less likely to report sexual assaults, it is very difficult to say "who gets raped more", and I honestly think that's the wrong question to be asking. Ergo, that isn't the poster of choice to put up.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:53 AM
2

It includes acts from childhood and it also counts male-male I'm interested in seeing that statistic sourced, but I find it more believable than the women statistic because of prison culture and how men are the majority sex in prisons.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 04:52 PM
3

When I was in high school I joined Speech & Debate club for a year. This is one of the only lessons I still remember from those competitions.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 09:54 PM
2

I've cohabitated with her for a couple years now and things have been very smooth.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 04:22 AM
3

Before we tie the knot I'm going to get legal council and draft up my own fair version of a marriage contract to use in lieu of the default one. That is, if I even decide to go through with it... I'm very skeptical and nervous about the whole thing, even though she is more rational and thoughtful than any other girl I've met.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:48 AM
1

We are both graduates from our university's math program, and experienced the same ratios. I don't believe we've ever discussed how it impacts our successes though.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:34 AM
4

She isn't a feminist (I would never marry one) but she isn't a skeptic so she hasn't realized some of the feminist propaganda is just that.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:13 AM
2

If I'm reading it correctly, its findings are that the wage gap can be explained down to 7 cents on the dollar by their measurable factors? That's certainly less than the accepted wage gap, but I'm surprised it is still that high.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:40 PM
5

Maybe I'll ask her about how she interprets the wage gap, because I'm not sure what her opinion on that is. It definitely seemed like she wasn't satisfied by the explanations I provided, but I don't want to assume she's saying something she's not.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:37 PM
16

Thank you for all the resources! Sources are always necessary; she and I agree on that much. :)
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:35 PM
24

When we were talking I tried to explain this (I have a background in Economics) but I did not explain it as coherently as you did. Thanks!
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:34 PM
6

Sorry, I didn't mean its a red flag that she has her own opinion. To me the red flag is ignoring factual information that doesn't conform to her worldview. I definitely see where you're coming from though, and you're right if that was what I meant.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:10 PM
1

Not sure if serious, or continuing the joke.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:35 AM
5

In childhood, boys are raised differently than girls. Boys learn that they must be breadwinners, though the path to that is not really explained. Girls learn that they can follow their dreams and are encouraged to find themselves.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:45 PM
2

Have you ever heard the feminist argument (more of a chant than an argument) that "You can't be sexist against men"? I wouldn't be surprised if the board believed that so much that they didn't think they were actually being discriminatory.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 06:00 PM
6

With normal English verbiage and definitions you'd be right, but for whatever reason the phrase "consent of the victim" does not apply to a man "made to penetrate." I think it is because the male isn't the one being penetrated and thus isn't being penetrated by the sex organ of another person. I hope you don't mind me saying, it is refreshing to see a self-proclaimed feminist with an open mind to such issues. :)
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:23 PM
3

OctopusNSquid's comment seems to already answer your question, if implicitly. I also think there needs to be a emphasis on helping men feel comfortable coming forward... ONS thinks society should help more men come forward, so ONS likely agrees that they are currently underrepresented in DV discussions.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 11:16 PM
2

A woman would never rape a man with the intention of getting pregnant? I'm not so sure, considering there are many documented cases of such behavior (albeit "forced to penetrate =/= rape" bs). While the context does somewhat alleviate this ignorance/acceptance of the double standard, it is still wrong and paints men in an unequal light.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 02:52 PM
2

Men don’t have to think about where they sit. It’s a non-event. Women and children do have to think about it because they live in a society where rape and assault are common and rarely defended against. I don't know about you guys, but I'm always hyper-aware of where I sit/stand and avoid unusual characters of either gender when I take public transportation. (Which is increasingly often as I do a lot in my city's downtown and recently got a bus pass.)
/r/MensRights22/08/12 12:11 AM
22

Hypocrisy at its finest.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:28 PM
3

What channel is this on or who is supporting it? I'd like to know who to write a strongly worded letter to and who to boycott.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 08:30 PM
13

He is publicizing his calling-out of an alleged person on being a false troll. He is not publicizing an off-kilter rant. He attempted to publicize this deal in other gender-relevant forums, but those posts were removed by moderation.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 02:22 AM
3

I personally feel like this doesn't belong on mensrights. Its a specific instance of ignorance but it borders on meme-ish. Its certainly anti-male, but is it anti-rights? It'd make me want to talk with the person behind the door, but that's about it.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 01:53 AM
3

Those statements can all be true. I hold them all to be true. The statement that "1 in 2" is a gross misuse of statistical data, and none of the sources on their website support it. (I've taken a rather lengthy look through them.)
/r/MensRights18/08/12 01:33 AM
4

One could argue (quite successfully) that social manipulation and small-circle politics are stereotypically feminine qualities. Just look at how young girls act in schools - pretty catty. Those qualities allow them to be just as trash-talk-y as any other gamer.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 12:39 AM
1

Ironically, another thread here shows that Men's Advice Line is actually just another feminist front organization that views men as abusers in need of reform rather than potential victims. No real help for male victims from them.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:48 PM
3

2 . I realize this isn't what you want to hear, but getting all weepy/NPR about the situation isn't going to help you. Get aggressive, get over it, get mad and (legally) get even, but don't get weepy. That way she cuts your balls off twice. Getting aggressive and legally even is fine, but don't try to police OP's emotions. He'll feel badly whether he physically weeps or not. Telling him to hide it is counterproductive to male emotional freedom.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:42 PM
1

I'm glad you took the time to chime in here. It's very easy to get emotional over even a discussion of DV, and some here are letting it blind them from an egalitarian view. I was going to try at explaining to GiltWashedCoprolite, but you wrote it better than I could.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:37 PM
7

If eponine87 was radfem, you'd be right, but she's only identified as a female here. Putting words in her mouth about privilege is unfair. Certainly it would strengthen feminist's support if their help centers also provided support to male victims - thus garnering support from more men [such as MRAs]. To me, it looks like you're looking for / practicing for an argument with a radical feminist, but it looks to me like eponine87 is a more reasonable person and your brashness risks alienating her f…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 08:33 PM
1

You should consider adding this as an edit to the OP. It is currently at the very bottom of the comments.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:50 PM
1

What makes the story sad is that he was clearly a good enough person to not stoop to that level. It wasn't just the self-inflicted death of a man, but the self-inflicted death of a decent man.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:41 PM
1

Maybe I'm just being idyllic here, but I like to think that all these systemic problems are "people issues." Everyone is affected by the issues on both sides of the MRM---FRM spectrum, and should have some degree of concern about the issues that exist and are relevant (ie not red herring issues).
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:39 PM
1

From what I'm getting of your standard, the person initiating isn't in a position to consent - because consenting means you're agreeing to something someone else has propositioned. I'm curious what you think of the following... If a drunk woman initiates with a sober man and he consents, is there no case for rape? She isn't in a position to consent because she propositioned him, after all?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:05 PM
1

Stopped reading once he claimed that the wage gap exists.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 07:31 AM
11

The article points out statistically proven issues, then just says "lets ignore those issues." I was impressed at the objective statements, but then floored as the author came to an absurd conclusion.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:12 PM
6

If a man stabbed a woman in the neck repeatedly, I don't think anyone would say her death was an accident.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 05:55 PM
4

You missed your /s
/r/MensRights03/08/12 08:42 PM
2

Tried to participate in the survey; first question page asked for basic details about my situation: Male, 18-59, abused by a female. My abusive "romantic" relationship lasted less than a month, and the survey told me I can't continue on. :(
/r/MensRights31/07/12 11:48 PM
3

I am appalled that my/our country's legal system is incentivized more towards having "perfect" incarceration records than it is towards upholding justice.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 10:09 AM
4

No deviation in red pens, more deviations in blue pens. Red pen not a pedophile. Granted, this picture isn't a strong indicator of anything, but it does show maybe some kinds of social preconceptions, maybe.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 03:42 AM
0

let's say neither person wants to be the primary custodian of the kids I'd hate to live in your world. If neither parent wants custody of the kids, why would the couple even have children? Logically, there must be at least one parent that wants children, most often both parents do or they wouldn't have them in the first place. Since reason shows that parents want to parent their children, and women are vastly more privileged in custody battles, its a cut and dry case of sexism against men. Neith…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 10:50 PM
2

Do this. It would cause quite a number of people to realize just how twisted our culture has gotten.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 03:30 PM
2

You'll note that spellchecks recognize misogyny but not misandry, too.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 03:29 PM
11

That this sort of thing is reported on as "news" is absurd. Its a situation of how teams are spending their budget... which is a social issue because why? Let people spend their money how they want to. Normally I'm all for calling out sexism, but that's not what is going on here. /facepalm.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 03:18 PM
28

Not only does kissing your daughter goodnight make you a pedophile, but it is sexualizing her and making her into a "tart." But we don't slut-shame... /s
/r/MensRights20/07/12 02:57 PM
2

But there are many examples of people calling themselves feminists that do just that. Plenty of examples across the sr.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 04:03 AM
15

There are tools and fools in both genders; no reason to feel disappointed in having one set of body bits or another. One thing that infuriates me is when men post "I'm ashamed to be a man" responses to something a toolish guy did. Every person is just that - an individual person. Be sad that she is so out of touch; don't be sad to be a woman. :)
/r/MensRights20/07/12 04:01 AM
2

I don't know about you, but I was not brought up being taught how to be connected to my emotions, and am only just getting back in touch with them after years of being cut off. I'd suggest cutting her some slack rather than getting bogged down in the word choice between "can be" and "are socially acceptably allowed to be." I'd say "can be" just because its less to type out and conveys the same idea. I agree that she isn't saying its a problem, but she doesn't say its well & good either.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:51 PM
3

The way I read her comment, she is pointing out differences in the gender roles that men and women currently fill. I didn't see anything that placed value one way or another - no "this is a good/bad thing". I think that, on average, and with the disclaimers she has at the start of her post, that she's right on the mark about how those gender roles play out. Its unfortunate that they are present, but she disagrees with the typical feminazi mindset.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:47 PM
4

I'm a member of /r/noFap, but I certainly don't think there's a gendered problem with people using pornography. If it doesn't make anyone involved hurt, what's the problem? Its not like these "actresses" don't know what they're getting into.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:33 PM
9

My one upvote does not suffice.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 05:39 PM
2

That's an interesting stance.... On one hand you have many innocent people already in prison who might get out if their false accusers care about them enough to get them out. On the other hand you have future false accusation victims out there that shouldn't have to go through that turmoil and social humiliation. Giving false accusers immunity means that MORE people will falsely accuse others and put them in jail, and only then will they maybe admit to the accusation being false. Prosecuting fal…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 04:45 PM
12

Aaaand not charged with anything.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 01:56 AM
5

I think its really important to point out how many times comedians have made light of men getting raped (almost any prison ever) and no one stands up and challenges it. Because people in the US have freedom of speech. I was also pissed about the "nappy headed ho's" fiasco. Some people are terrible at recognizing OTHER people's rights... including many feminists.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 05:09 AM
2

I think this is fantastic, and I further think that there should be a partner program for the "Because I am a Boy" initiative.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 06:31 PM
2

If a kind redditor more skilled than I can provide an email address to anyone involved in the Olympic Committee or in any part of this decision, please do so. I would like to write them a strongly worded letter (still with complete polite professionalism) about their negligence in half of the support system that these athletes have.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 09:27 AM
6

This comment thread gives me hope for the MRM and an egalitarian culture.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 05:21 PM
-1

What the actual f***? Its like they're deliberately not trying to help male victims.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 05:40 AM
1

It makes sense to me at least! And it does suck. Our conflicting opinions are largely about there not being a perfect answer to the issue, but trying to get as fair as possible. As you say, the responsibility of prevention or the blame (from society) is almost entirely on women. If there were more effective means of contraception for men, I expect they would be more equitable in this regard. Currently the only options men have are condoms (which women also have) and surgical vasectomy. (I'm sure…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 04:30 AM
1

You're using the 2nd wave definition of feminism. The vast majority of feminists you'll meet today are 3rd wave, and have vastly different motivations and ideas.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 04:08 AM
2

I think you make some good points here, but are discussing the issue from a different angle than most others. This issue quickly gets complicated because there is no way to make birthing options fair as you note. I don't think this discussion is focusing on who should have the right to choose to move forward with a pregnancy or not - I and the other MRA I've encountered fully agree that people should have control of their own bodies, including pregnancy. However, we're more focused on the issue …
/r/MensRights10/07/12 12:59 AM
1

Not going to pay to read the full article, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 12:05 AM
1

Men have been socialized to be more stoic, with some societies regarding pain endurance as a sign of virility. Women have also been socialized to express things that are troubling them, such as pain. Women have been socialized to be help-seeking. Men have been socialized to be providers, not receiving help but giving it. Just a few more social biases that make an objective measure of gender-based pain tolerance difficult/impossible to obtain. Frankly, I'm not even sure what good it does for soci…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 12:03 AM
10

Clearly the women that OP was sitting with thought the statistic was legitimate. I wouldn't be surprised if the majority of people blindly believe it.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 06:19 AM
6

Reading those comments made me sick. That people think statutory rape is ever good for a child is mind boggling.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:50 AM
3

You have your acknowledges and stresses mixed up. Let me FTFY... It stresses a general bias that rape is seen with a female victim BUT acknowledges it can happen to men too.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 01:24 AM
21

She didn't come forward about it because she just wanted to see the woman win and the man lose. It also shows that police operate on a presumption of guilt.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 03:22 PM
3

This is a fantastic response to anyone who tries to argue about appearance discrimination. Thanks for the reminder!
/r/MensRights08/06/12 03:58 PM
3

I see this attitude in women students nearly every day at my college campus. It is a real thing that isn't isolated to just "a few women like that out there."
/r/MensRights05/06/12 06:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter