TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

puredoubt Archive

View 12 posts and 229 comments by puredoubt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
48

puredoubt/r/MensRights28/04/12 08:19 PM
38

puredoubt/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:01 PM
26

puredoubt/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:50 PM
18

Ask Red Pillpuredoubt/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 10:07 PM
14

Ask Red Pillpuredoubt/r/TheRedPill25/05/13 07:34 AM
10

puredoubt/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 06:38 PM
6

puredoubt/r/seduction10/04/13 06:34 PM
1

puredoubt/r/seduction25/11/12 01:16 AM
1

puredoubt/r/seduction17/11/12 03:57 AM
1

puredoubt/r/MensRights08/02/11 07:58 PM
0

puredoubt/r/MensRights20/11/11 04:24 AM
0

puredoubt/r/MensRights01/02/11 09:25 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

TIL about MGTOW.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/13 09:36 PM
4

Fair enough. /r/MensRights would be a good start. edit: on reflection, you're right. that wasn't constructive, and i apologize.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/13 05:16 AM
-3

I'm fucking amazed at how little you TRP guys know about what rights you don't have. You better wake the fuck up, all of you.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/13 11:58 PM
7

Sorry.. I should've mentioned, fast forward to about three minutes.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:55 PM
1

isn't there already an /r/SDSeddit or something like that? or SDPickup. Something like that.
/r/seduction27/06/13 08:56 AM
3

San Diego, Texas!!! yeah.. it's there.
/r/seduction27/06/13 08:55 AM
2

North Park checking in. You can find me in the gaslamp most of the time. I'm no PUA, and I have an LTR but I'll be happy to wing anytime.
/r/seduction27/06/13 08:55 AM
3

Simple. We don't.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/13 09:50 AM
3

I thought the exact same thing! Not only do I need to be concerned for my safety, but women's as well. This idiot is seriously misguided and flat out sexist.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/13 01:31 AM
3

exactly my point. video gaming can be quality time as well. sure, some can become addicted, but that's not the norm. and you shouldn't assume someone who plays WoW is doing so in an unhealthy way.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/13 11:33 PM
3

Say that to yourself next time you're playing monopoly.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/13 11:23 PM
22

Good point. Ya know, everyone who ever really hurt me was a woman. That's why I don't hire women. What's that? I'm being sued for discrimination?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 06:51 AM
5

That counts... more than your other billionaire douche bags. cough. TRUMP cough
/r/TheRedPill15/06/13 09:33 PM
-4

So what? Same is true of men. Other than bill gates, name one billionaire who truly earned it. I can't think of one.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/13 08:46 PM
0

nah... at that point, it's already a blown situation. Nobody's having fun and the ship has sailed. But OP won the day! OP, you had an experience that you are able to learn from and benefit from for the rest of your life. All she knows is she had a dull conversation. You win! Keep going!!!!
/r/seduction09/06/13 02:49 AM
1

Don't get pissed, just don't get married.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:36 PM
11

Marry a beauty queen with four kids. Brilliant.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 12:07 AM
1

oh, I missed the rhyme.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/13 02:27 AM
12

I would advise against that. The father isn't around anymore, which is a pretty good indicator that she turned him into a father against his will. What's to say she won't do the same to you? Condoms won't guarantee you won't be fucked (in fact, the used condom can be the very weapon she uses and you're still on the hook). Don't put your peepee anywhere near these women.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/13 02:11 AM
13

I think someone is vote brigading us.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/13 03:38 AM
1

Yeah, not really. It didn't happen like that at all. You really think there was such a disparity in intelligence at any point in time? Whether a given individual was smart or not is irrelevant. What matters is that the species overall became more intelligent, thus survival and prosperity.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/13 03:27 AM
-7

"photoshoop" made me laugh.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 02:54 PM
3

yep. that's obvious from this FB post. she had to mention that he's fifty-something years old. yet they're colleagues. i doubt he's the CEO or owner since he's emailing her directly. hence, he's not socially valuable enough for her to find not "creepy." i never realized it until now, but i've been a victim of sexual harassment too! that bitch with the ugly ass toes who wears sandals every day. and the toe ring... eeewww!!! doesn't she know that's sexual harassment?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:31 PM
3

i read that last part in sarah palin's voice. actually, maybe it was tina fey doing sarah palin.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 07:29 PM
5

Yep. It's ironic how little respect they have for themselves.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 03:28 AM
21

Yep. This is misogyny, pure and simple. "Women are too stupid to be responsible." Brilliant. What a fucking cunt. I have a lot more respect for women than this moron.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:04 AM
1

Thanks. I knew this group would be rough. Fact is, I like this girl.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/13 04:06 AM
1

yep.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/13 10:17 AM
0

pretty much. i've got work to do. but she's back, so i'll try to be more redpill going forward. it's tough, tho.. she's super smart and accomplished. this is AP class.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/13 10:11 AM
0

i just went to FB to see if i could delete the message. turns out, she responded.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/13 07:45 AM
1

haha... i remember the thread you're referring to. actually, i said i don't care.. not that i "like" that.. but point taken.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/13 07:41 AM
3

fair enough. i figured. if she responds, great. if not... i'm not doing any more.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/13 07:40 AM
3

POW!
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 04:47 AM
1

Whataya mean? I have personal experience. It's not always true. I dunno what else I can say here.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 09:19 AM
0

Always? Sorry, simply not true.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 07:51 AM
0

Ok, will delete.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 11:46 PM
-1

but OP never said any of that. she just said "calling out to her." calling out what?? "hey, you dropped your pencil"? she refuses to give detail. that's all i was asking for. the details of WHY she felt she was "in danger." apparently, that's not reasonable there.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 11:30 PM
1

i wanna post this to FB sooo bad!!
/r/MensRights17/05/13 06:33 PM
1

i apologize if i came off smug, honestly. i really was perplexed by this consensus view of redpillers, and still kind of am. so, while we may never see eye-to-eye on this, i appreciate your comments. i need to learn to calm down on reddit.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/13 09:17 AM
4

the wording of this article indicates a pretty clear right-wing bias. they never say "support liberal views" but rather keep saying "support the welfare state." yeah... totally. no bias there. anyway, a single study that is not peer-reviewed means fuck-all. so, i'm not buying this shit at all.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/13 02:12 AM
2

in a woman's body, sure. :)
/r/TheRedPill17/05/13 12:15 AM
-2

"ask him to elaborate" is precisely what i did. what are you all up in arms about? "Well if we track back to OP you may find the phrase "less likely" in there. Kind of leaves out that girlfriend of yours, don't you think?"... i honestly have no idea what that means.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/13 12:29 AM
1

don't ask for evidence for assertions. got it.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/13 12:10 AM
0

i'm sure there is. but most people make poor decisions, right? so while the average guy may end up with a low quality woman, as reflected in the stats, our job as redpill men is to make better decisions and find the 1% cream of the crop girls. and they do exist, is all i'm saying.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 11:48 PM
1

what do you mean you'll eventually find out?
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 11:46 PM
0

haha.. wut??
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 11:45 PM
0

interesting. that just wouldn't work for me. i expect sex on the second or third meeting (assuming attraction was built right away). i need to know if we're compatible or not right away. most of the time, we're not and it fizzles out in just a week or two. i assume girls have the same experience. i know for a fact they do, since i'm often the other side of that coin. so, some prior sexual encounters that didn't turn into LTRs i would think is expected. if a girl tells you all sex was within the …
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 11:21 PM
1

i suppose that's a useful protection mechanism for you, and fairly reasonable. but, be aware you could be missing out on some great girls. i've personally experienced a great LTR after promiscuity, so i know it's possible. probably not typical tho, you're right.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 11:11 PM
-3

well, you've had some bad experiences then. i have an ex who had many, many previous partners and was a great red pill GF. in fact, i used to describe her to people as "a man in a woman's body" because she was so cool.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 11:09 PM
1

wasn't accusing anyone of anything. just confused by people's attitude on this. but it's a little clearer now.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 10:44 PM
0

ah, i hadn't even considered the marriage angle. that's not an option for me. i meant just for dating.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 10:31 PM
-1

that word "standards" keeps coming up. i guess i just see it the other way around. i see it as kind of a cool conquest if a girl has been around the block... "all that dick and she's decided to settle down with me 'cause i'm worth it" kinda thing. also, maybe it has to do with age. if you're dating twenty-year-olds (which you shouldn't be if you're looking for an LTR), then yeah.. i could see the point. but i date older women... late thirties. so, 20-50 partners is not unreasonable. figure two p…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 10:28 PM
-1

i don't think that's true at all. what are you basing this on? "less likely" than what? i think there are much bigger factors that would contribute to this issue. i had a GF for over four years, one of which was even long distance. it was a very close relationship, consistent great sex, and we were certainly bonded. she had had dozens of partners before, and so had i. the only reason it ended was because of the long distance. i decided that if i pulled up roots and moved out to be with her, she …
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 10:15 PM
6

sex and emotional baggage? not in my experience. does your past sexual experience cause baggage for you? hopefully not. so, why would it for her? i'm starting to think i'm the one with the high standards here. my exes are all very well adjusted. some have had only a few partners, others have had dozens.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 09:58 PM
8

you really think that's the same thing?? seems strange to me, but OK.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 09:54 PM
7

you see a dried up used maid. i see a horny, sexy girl who loves to fuck. anyway, i'll agree to disagree. but caring about past partners smells like insecurity to me.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 09:45 PM
3

if she has emotional baggage, that's a separate issue. the previous sex partners (or number of them) shouldn't matter to a redpill guy. my current GF actually still lives with her ex! and you know what? i don't give a shit. i offered to help her find her own place, and that's all i'll say about it. i have no reason to think she's still fucking him, so i don't care. actually, it's an advantage because i never have to go to her house. she always comes to me. :)
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 09:23 PM
4

really? why does this matter to you? if she's faithful to you while you're together, what's the difference? sometimes people really are done with putting up numbers and are ready to "settle down." caring about this doesn't seem all that redpill to me.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 08:59 PM
15

"The judge handling the case indicated he might consider a sentence of community detention." That is fucking disgusting. This is the most unequal punishment you could have. If she succeeded in her crime, a man could have gone to prison for decades! And she may get community detention? If you kill someone, you yourself may be killed as punishment. If you attempt to kill someone, or rob them, or steal their car, or point a gun at them, etc.. you're going to prison for a long time because of the po…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 08:12 PM
1

So what happened after you had made it?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:59 AM
5

i think he was being sarcastic.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 07:13 PM
2

the whole "free jahar" thing is just a bunch of insane people. i.e., young girls. who the fuck ever thought they were sane in the first place? the dude killed a bunch of people. there's a reason we don't let teenagers vote. looking at some of the republican party, tho, we might as well. connection to reality does not seem to be a prerequisite.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/13 07:19 PM
3

i don't understand a word you just said. but i like it.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 03:50 PM
1

So fuck without condoms. Get snipped. Or. Choose the women carefully and demand proof of birth control ("I'm on the pill" doesn't count). With some careful planning and willingness to get involved, you can joy (relatively) safe sex without condoms. Of course, if you're looking to bag a different girl every night, disregard all of this. Also, if your concern is STDs, disregard.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 06:56 AM
2

This sounds like just being a dick. Why screw the bartender just to prove you're alpha? And maybe she WAS genuinely shocked. No need to be a prick about it.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:27 AM
1

That's cool and all, but I wouldn't recommend we all take a bullet to prove we're alpha. If you're looking for the greatest man ever, look no further than Ben Franklin. His autobiography should be mandatory reading as far as I'm concerned.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:20 AM
2

Yeah, that's a really strange referral.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:16 AM
2

A girl once offered to buy me a drink at a bar. I said sure. When she pulled out her credit card, without thinking I just blurted out "what, did you steal that from your boyfriend?" i don't even know what that means! Next thing I know, she's making out with me like a lemur in heat at the bar.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:11 AM
2

I'm printing this as a poster and hanging it over my desk. Then I'm going to the gym.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 06:56 AM
7

Yep, kids = undatable in my opinion. If they were grown and we were both in our forties, that may be a different story. But at 22!? Good god, woman.. anyone here would run far and fast. What you need is a classic "nice guy" who you're not going to find very attractive. But that's the bed you've made. Hope this doesn't sound mean. Good luck!
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 06:50 AM
4

aceofspudz, you win reddit today.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 06:43 AM
2

Not in the south. Didn't a science teacher, teaching sex ex, just get in trouble for saying "vagina?"
/r/MensRights04/05/13 11:15 PM
4

I think it's cool.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/13 09:07 PM
9

shut the fuck up, donnie!
/r/seduction22/04/13 10:52 PM
1

cool, thanks.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:37 AM
2

certainly related to that.. or in the same category. i wish a lawyer would weigh in here. is there an /r/AskALawyer or something? (probably not... why work for free, right?)
/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:24 AM
2

no, perjury is when you're under oath and willingly lie, for example when testifying in court or giving a deposition. a terrorist threat varies by jurisdiction, but this would certainly qualify just about anywhere, i think. edit: the word "terrorist" today obviously carries lots of connotations, but basically (and in criminal law) it simply means coercing someone to do something they don't want to by threatening them in some way. so you can see how this would apply. if any attorneys wanna weigh …
/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:13 AM
32

seriously. let's consider the reverse for a second: "send me a picture of your pussy please. if you don't, i'll tell the police you committed a felony." yeah, that's called making a terrorist threat and it's a serious crime. EDIT: OP, i very much encourage you to report this to police. if not for yourself, for her next victim. this woman is obviously unstable... imagine if she actually does this one day, to you or someone else! the police should know of her behavior BEFORE she goes falsely repor…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 12:29 AM
-1

that's actually a bit of a relief. see? a little bit of truth and science and things usually aren't as bad as they seem. thanks. i'll look into this more and assuming what you're saying is true i'll probably get off this particular band-wagon. but as you say... "still..."
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:23 AM
1

my thoughts, really. however, there is ONE little monkey wrench to throw into the story. maybe it matters, maybe i'm trying to rationalize. but anyway, that night my phone wasn't working, which she knew. so perhaps that's why not call/text. the phone IS back online now, which has me wondering if i should text her.. just a "hey, phone's working again." but, part of me says that's just me wanting to say "Hey! Where were you!?!?" which is obviously bad.
/r/seduction10/04/13 06:48 PM
1

Maybe angelou our said it
/r/seduction19/03/13 08:37 PM
3

Beats sitting around at home. Plus, this is how I've met most my friends. And picked up bartenders. I'm a barfly, i admit.
/r/seduction11/01/13 09:46 PM
16

You mean when on a date or all the time? I love to sit in a bar, have a beer, and browse reddit on my phone. I'm alone when I do this.
/r/seduction11/01/13 12:25 AM
2

yeah.. except i'm not attracted to asian women. so... damn.
/r/seduction15/11/12 06:51 PM
1

holy shit... it's a chain! of course it is. now i can stop wondering why it attracts the wrong crowd around here. anyway, penis, come out to SD! you'll love it, it's beautiful, and we're super friendly people.
/r/seduction08/11/12 08:01 PM
3

oh.. just wondered 'cause there's a relatively new place called mcfadden's downtown in the gaslamp district. i suppose there's lots of places called mcfadden's, but the one here is particularly ripe with... well... you know.
/r/seduction07/11/12 10:18 PM
1

Are you in san diego?
/r/seduction07/11/12 09:22 PM
10

really? why? if women are happy to acknowledge that they're worth less than men, so be it. oh wait... was that sexist?? shit... string me up!
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:41 PM
1

exactly right. i think that was my point. pointing out the hypocricy that we're (as men) are supposed to tolerate as just "silly" while when we (or I in this case) say the same thing, we're labeled mysoginist and every other bad name that can be thought of. not always, of course, but too much. yes, she's right. and so was i. the comparison between the two that i was trying to draw was totally missed on her, tho, and that's what got under my skin. hope that's clearer now.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 01:44 AM
2

agreed. but generally, when speaking to fellow americans, people tend to cite and interpret all stats to be in the context of americans. just the way it is. and in the context of americans, it's around half, if not more. globally, tho, you're right... it's more between 1/3 and 1/6. here's where i got my info from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_circumcision edit: thinking about it... you're right, i should be more careful with my "facts." i guess i'm coming from the point of view tha…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 07:40 PM
1

i live in the US, and here most boys are circumcised at birth (myself included).
/r/MensRights01/05/12 07:30 PM
1

pretty sure. in the US. worldwide, i dunno. please correct me if i'm wrong.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 07:23 AM
1

true, it's not the same procedure "medically" if you will.. but the word mutilation is, i think, meant to be inflammatory anyway.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:43 AM
-1

oops.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:57 PM
0

that's what i thought too. thanks.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:06 PM
-3

again.. huh?
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:05 PM
1

i think you're right. good point. that brings up all sorts of other topics.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 10:01 PM
-8

yeah, i did that, jerk. didn't apply to me. hence the "huh?"
/r/MensRights28/04/12 09:34 PM
-3

huh? maybe i double clicked the button or something, but it's not a re-post of anything. whatchoo talkin' 'bout?
/r/MensRights28/04/12 08:49 PM
2

this was a rare occurrence. things are mostly fine otherwise. i.e., we have our issues, but this isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 05:04 PM
10

i wish you would have a long, sit-down chat with my GF. we were at a sex shop a few weeks ago, she was shopping for a bachelorette party gift for a friend. we go to the gift card section and she pulls one, chuckles, hands it to me and says "this one's funny." suffice it to say, i didn't find it all that funny... something about a man being dragged behind a car with a rope around his neck. so, i didn't raise a stink, just said "yeah, that's hilarious. i'm sure if it were a woman being dragged beh…
/r/MensRights27/04/12 08:00 PM
7

I totally agree with this. Walking away was the right thing to do at the moment. But subsequently, there needs to be repercussions for that shit.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:12 PM
-7

CALLED IT!
/r/MensRights02/02/12 12:44 AM
0

i dunno, personal experience, anecdotes, non-blinded "experiments"... all KINDS of non-scientific nonsense shit. who cares? i mean, we're talking about a people who elect a guy who introduced a law to ban the use of human fetuses in food. sorry, that story is something i read recently and it's been weighing on my little mind.
/r/MensRights02/02/12 12:32 AM
-21

fuck you. you're dumb. downboat. let's see what happens....
/r/MensRights01/02/12 11:57 PM
-19

i agree with your sentiment, but you're dead wrong. women are WAY more guilty of childish behavior than men. i mean, it's not even CLOSE.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 11:56 PM
1

yeah, 'cause awesome girls i want totally want me when i act like a complete pussy.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 09:24 PM
1

not all of them... but some of them, yes.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 07:10 PM
9

somehow i feel like i should subscribe to this magazine. this falls squarely under the banner of "know thy enemy."
/r/MensRights30/01/12 09:26 PM
1

couldn't tell ya why, buddy. i just feel that way. it seems way wrong. which is why i asked the question.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 09:22 AM
1

i 100% agree with you. uhhh... don't get me started on VAWA. interesting, tho.. you seemed to allude that our natural inclination to help the women we love is used against us. i think that makes total sense, and should be brought up more.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 02:55 AM
0

haha.. you're right. that first one makes me laugh. it's like when someone says something is totally "unremarkable" and you think, then why are you remarking? anyway, back to the subject.. yeah, i DO feel like it's the male's role to protect the female. which, when you think about it enough, is strange and also not strange at all. it's a strange feeling that i think most of us guys feel. that's why i posted this question here on men's rights. i figured it would get a discussion going, which it h…
/r/MensRights21/11/11 12:48 AM
0

uhhh... what? are you saying i'm trolling /r/mensrights?? go look at my history. i'm a big proponent of men's rights and /r/mensrights. if asking an honest question on /r/mensrights makes you believe i'm a troll, then the mods need to take a good look at YOU, not me.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 05:44 PM
-1

well, that last statement was just absurd, so i won't even comment on it. as for the women "should be protected" comment, that's a straw man. i never said that. i said that i personally would feel like protecting my girlfriend if she were sitting next to me.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 05:42 PM
-5

oops, sorry, i was talking about the attacks on UC Davis on planet earth. which planet were you talking about?
/r/MensRights20/11/11 05:45 AM
-5

let me finish your sentence..."oh wait... 'cause men should protect women." 'cause this is /r/mensrights (something i care a lot about), not let's turn the world upside fucking down. get real.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 05:07 AM
-2

yes, i know all that. in fact the faculty is asking for the chancellor's head! because of this. but that doesn't address what we can all see on these vids, and it doesn't address my question.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 04:40 AM
-3

i mean... cop or not, if some grown man is threatening your girl, you fucking do something, don't you?
/r/MensRights20/11/11 04:33 AM
-2

fair enough. i understand that. i'm talking more about before it happened. i mean, it wasn't a surprise, they threatened them and walked back and forth with the weapon. if i were in that sitting group and a girl i cared about was next to me, i would have shielded her some way, is all i'm saying.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 04:32 AM
2

i'm still confused about this "mistake" he made or why he has "strike one"?? falsely accusing someone of rape is a serious crime. if you have direct knowledge that the claim is false, that makes you an accessory after the fact. if you don't at least encourage the guy to file a police report against your sister, you're just as bad as she is! maybe that will teach her to stop fucking with other people'e lives for her own amusement.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 10:19 PM
0

uhhh.. that's a whole lot of words with no point. octagenarians tend to go a big senile, i guess.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 05:34 PM
3

but that's just not how humans work. I haven't "convinced myself" that i prefer brunettes. i fucking prefer brunettes. plain and simple. tho, years ago, i did live with a girl who was (and still is) blonde and i loved her very much. things like hair color become trivial when there are overriding factors (those non-sexual characteristics we were talking about, for example). certain other things, tho, are deal breakers. for example, i would never date a religious person. i'm still not sure what yo…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 02:47 AM
3

also, i apologize for being such a dick, but men's rights really gets me going.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 02:25 AM
4

ok, fair enough. so then what was your point exactly? (sorry if i misunderstood, but i'm even more confused now.. :o))
/r/MensRights13/11/11 02:16 AM
7

yes i am able to see the distinction. however, i thought we were discussing what YOU said. and that's not what you said. go ahead and read it... it's right there... in black and white. go on..
/r/MensRights13/11/11 01:54 AM
9

again, you're contradicting yourself. you're bereft of your own argument. find an opinion and stick with it. or just go away.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 01:26 AM
8

that's the SECOND dumbest comment i've ever read on /r/mensrights. let me point out the fact that you are a liar: you did say "This does completely ignore all non-physical characterists..." and you just said it again! saying i like brunettes or blondes "ignores all characteristics of a person other than the color of their hair." by your stupid fucked up logic, saying i like carne asada means i don't eat any other kind of food. you're a clown. edit: i suspect you are a troll here. look at your la…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 01:08 AM
11

unfortunately, nonsense like this is taken seriously by some idiots, which is why this sub exists in the first place. much like bullies, i think the best course of action is to just ignore assholes like this. let's encourage our fellow humans to treat simple mindedness like this the way it deserves to be treated.. with contempt. try to laugh it off. i do. (oh, but don't forget to publicly scorn these assholes when you have the chance)
/r/MensRights13/11/11 12:50 AM
8

wait, i thought you're supposed to blindfold her. have i been doing it wrong all this time?
/r/MensRights13/11/11 12:47 AM
11

that is the dumbest fucking comment i've ever read on /r/mensrights. congrats. i prefer brunettes over blondes. does that mean i "ignore all non-physical characteristics"?? of course not. i also prefer women who are smart, educated, skeptical, non-religious, into jazz, etc. only a total fucking IDIOT (that's you here) would say preferring a hair color ignores all other characteristics.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 12:45 AM
2

i'm only offended by the hyphenated "no-one."
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:32 PM
1

right.. i got the sense you grew up a girl, hence the "chica" comment. just giving you shit the same way i would any of my guy friends.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 05:11 PM
0

but he wasn't a boy. this guy says he was born a girl and became a man as an adult.. so, not sure what the hell you're talking about. and yes... best word choice.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 04:08 PM
1

interesting POV. although, i have to say, i have no idea what you're talking about. i grew up relatively poor... i mean, we weren't destitute or anything, and i grew up in a shitty town where drugs and alcohol were the only things to do, but.. i've since grown up and i'm now fairly successful. anyway, i don't see how any of this would come into play when we're talking about just a random encounter on the street.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:48 AM
1

ha! while i admire your enthusiasm.. not in our lifetime, bud. edit: plus.. your "economic standing" point eludes me. if i run into you on the street, outside a bar, say... how the fuck would i know what your "economic standing" is? if i decide you need a beatdown, then you're gonna get a beatdown. i don't see what your parents' net worth has to do with anything.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:33 AM
2

i would file this observation under "duh." YES, of course that's correct! let's not forget the fact that men are MUCH less likely to report violence against them by loved ones (typically GFs or wives) because we're taught to "be a man" and just "man up." we're expected to just accept that it's our duty as men to tolerate physical violence from women. EDIT: let me just clarify... i'm not saying men are perpetual victims of violence from women. i mean, assuming no weapons are involved (BIG DIFFERE…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:54 AM
2

i don't believe you.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:52 AM
2

don't back down from that comment. i think you're 100% right. as was said, there are assholes in any segment of society, be they tall, short, big, small.. whatever. sure, shorter guys may have a napoleon complex, but ultimately you just never know who you're dealing with when you run into a stranger. and i think you're right... being white is an advantage in this country. people like to root for someone, especially during a fight (shit, look at "metaphorical fights" like football, hockey, etc.).…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:50 AM
1

welcome to manhood, chica. everything you've said echos loud and true in my mind. unfortunately for you, you were never raised a boy, so you can't truly get the sense of "becoming a man." (no offense, i'm sure you know what i mean) as young boys, we're taught to not only protect ourselves at all times, but to also protect our friends and loved ones, particularly women. you have to be ready to fight at all times. the more clever ones (like me, e.g.) learn to always talk ourselves out of a jam thr…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:41 AM
-1

I read that as "I feel (bad men) get raped...."
/r/MensRights02/10/11 09:45 PM
1

cool, I'll do that. But, all the misspelling made that very hard to read.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 12:34 AM
1

we're fighting an uphill battle, tho.. it's really tough. thank fuck for places like /r/MensRights. and i've noticed that in the online community in general (not just reddit) people are starting to wake up a little bit. but not enough. then we have our thorns.. people like tom lykis. now, don't get me wrong... a lot of what he says is absolutely true, but his goal is not advancement of men's rights. it's radio listenership. can't fault him for that, that's his job. but people like that really do…
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:24 AM
6

of course it's not about collecting money. BTW, when this guy gets out, he'll still owe all that back child support. women making men fathers against their will is the only legal form of fraud. essentially, they want to put you to a decision: you can either pay your taxes, or you can pay your child support. either way, you're going to jail. all of this serves one important purpose. it's so politicians can go on TV and talk about how they put another "dead-beat dad" behind bars. it's a war on men…
/r/MensRights27/09/11 01:09 AM
1

either you're confused or I'm confused by you. if a woman used a sperm donor's sperm to get pregnant and decides she wants $$$, she can get it. who is this imaginary other guy who "knocked her up?" what are you talking about?
/r/MensRights24/09/11 06:42 PM
1

which is easier? sorry, i don't get the question.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:23 AM
4

wrong! it has happened! to be clear, you can sue for anytbing your little heart desires. the question is, will you win? unfortunately, tbe answer is yes! it's rare but sperm donors have been compelled to pay child support.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 06:06 PM
-4

first of all, that's not funny. and you're not helping our cause. or anyone's cause. at all.
/r/MensRights03/09/11 10:03 AM
1

sweetie, what the hell did your dad do to you? oh, wait... i don't care. fuck you.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 11:03 PM
1

thank god only about ten people live in luxembourg.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 10:47 PM
2

ok.. i've read some shit in my time, but this actually stunned me. i wrote a comment asking the author to apologize, and i also posted this to my FB wall. when some people (women and guys who are pussies) argue there's no such thing as "men's rights", i'll point them to this article. fucking sick bitch.
/r/MensRights16/08/11 08:48 PM
4

faaan.. tastic. yes, women can be criminals TOO? "TOO?" really? what a wonderful revelation! i'll start the slow clap.. *clap*... *clap*... *clap*...
/r/MensRights16/08/11 06:23 AM
10

I think I meant "complement" there.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 06:37 PM
6

If by "dating" you mean potential gf, then yes, of course. I'm self employed and own my home. Not that these qualities make me better than anyone else, but a potential partner needs to be on my level intellectually, creatively, and in her career. Now, I suppose if you're looking for a house mouse that's another story. But personally, I want someone to compliment and inspire me.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 06:27 PM
1

i read that in the voice of the prosecuting attorney in "my cousin, vinny." it's pronounced "Hai-AY-nous crime."
/r/MensRights02/08/11 04:24 PM
12

i thought that same thing initially. "why is this in mensrights?" then i read this: "...her son's hell of sexual abuse and death threats at the hands of both his biological and adoptive fathers." ka-ching! there it is. a woman who exposes her kids to abusive people (repeatedly) is herself a victim. any man who did the same would be a child abuser.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 04:22 PM
3

if that's true, that's great. but somehow, i have to think that the court will do what's in the best interest of the child. if you're the only one in the picture with a paycheck, that means you're up.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 11:33 PM
2

If you signed the birth cert, that's an admission of paternity (at least financially). No matter what, you still have to pay. But it may be good to know... at least then your daughter will know what kind of lying skank the bitch is.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 08:01 PM
-2

yeah, because boys have after school jobs, play sports and have, ya know, hobbies and stuff.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 07:02 PM
8

the man can demand it. sadly, most are too stupid to know or do this.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 12:17 AM
1

she obviously hasn't seen the movie, goth
/r/MensRights15/04/11 04:26 PM
1

you may be right. i just have never been really hurt by a girl, but maybe i'm being naive. i don't like being called an idiot, but i appreciate your comment.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 04:00 PM
1

why would i crush her windpipe?
/r/MensRights08/04/11 06:44 PM
1

damn, that's a big girl.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 02:00 AM
1

really? i'm interested in anthropology. can you give an example? i know about those big nosed binobo fuckers, of course, but anything else?
/r/MensRights07/04/11 11:36 PM
2

hear hear!!!
/r/MensRights07/04/11 11:25 PM
0

primates are extremely dimorphic de facto. so saying we're less so than great apes (gorillas, e.g.) is not really significant. as humans, the males are much bigger and stronger than, say, spiders or snakes. and i already said, yes, of course weapons are a different deal altogether. edit: scratch spiders. many of the females are much bigger than the males. but you get my point...
/r/MensRights07/04/11 11:24 PM
-4

well, a weapon is a different story, of course, but that's typically not the case. but with her bare hands? no, she really can't hurt me. i mean, she could maybe scratch me or pull my hair or something, but for the most part, no. and yes, humans are very sexually dimorphic primates, so compared to males... yes, girls are relatively fragile and weak. not mentally, of course. just physically. edit: and contrary to popular belief, men have a higher pain tolerance than women. did you know that?
/r/MensRights07/04/11 09:00 PM
-15

yeah, but... it's called taking it like a man. i don't know about you, but a girl can't really hurt me (unless it's some huge large-and-in-charge bitch). the best thing he could do was just end the situation and move on. no need for vengeance.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 08:36 PM
2

That's a tough blow to homosexuals. I mean, if people start actually observing the sanctity of marriage...
/r/MensRights17/03/11 01:30 AM
9

it's not. it's a feel-sorry-for-pussies-cause-they-do issue.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:30 PM
4

huh? if you don't start out a pussy, and simply don't become one... this kinda shit will never happen. i don't understand this self-pity. edit: just checked out OP's history... either an anti-MR troll, or a really, really strange and confused dude.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 03:30 PM
1

actually, this is funny... just today i happened to get a hair up my butt about sexual dimorphism in humans and i stumbled on this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_humans it's really fascinating shit. check it out.
/r/MensRights06/03/11 08:29 AM
3

my comment was glib. i'm surprised i got any upboats at all. anyway, regarding your claim with fine motor control, can you cite something? thx.
/r/MensRights06/03/11 08:25 AM
9

women are better at video games, huh? and using a hammer. see, the funny thing is... only a woman would be stupid enough to believe such nonsense.
/r/MensRights06/03/11 05:37 AM
1

it can make SOME girls fat, like all forms of birth control, really. my ex gf didn't really have a problem with that. and not having periods for years IS a good thing, actually. keep in mind, a girl having a period for months on end really is not nature's design. before birth control ("in the wild" if you will), women would be pregnant most of the time, and so have just a couple periods in between pregnancies.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 06:31 PM
2

perseus... i've read your comment now probably fifty times. you know that thing when you don't want to accept something, but it's just slapping its disgusting dick in your face? i think you're a hundred percent right. you all are. i am being arrogant about this. thank you so much. seriously, dude.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 07:56 AM
1

really? why? my ex gf really preferred it and in fact stayed on it for the full three years we were together. she liked not having her period, for one thing. and it's super effective. so why do you say that? are you female and have experience with it?
/r/MensRights02/02/11 07:42 AM
2

not gonna wait, but will definitely ask/demand to go to the next appt. thanks for your reply, tho.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 07:40 AM
2

yeah, that's exactly what i said. why am i getting downvotes? reddit can be confusing sometimes.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 12:34 AM
-1

well, very few pennies anyway. i already have irrevocable trusts set up, and my c corp owns my car and pretty much everything else. looking destitute on paper is good for many reasons; this is just one. a very good one. i make sure my sex partners understand that. that being said... cumming inside a chick just feels so DAMN GOOD!
/r/MensRights01/02/11 11:57 PM
1

interesting. i should know all this and do not. my ex-gf didn't have any period whatsoever on the depro shot (which is supposed to be common... i guess that's basically how it works). i can bring it up that way. thanks, everyone for the sincere advice and replies. this is why reddit is so damn great.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 11:50 PM
2

you speak truth, sir. i was afraid of that... there's really no way to prove it without invading her privacy and being a total asshole. i like the diaphragm idea! thanks for that. we've already had sex many times without protection, other than the alleged depro. is it true that depro can be less effective for the first three months? if so, i'll definitely recommend the diaphragm.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 10:03 PM
2

right. she said she's due again on april 14th or some such... maybe i should go with her. there's a lot of fucking to be done in the meantime, tho.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 09:59 PM
2

that was my first thought (my last gf got the shot too, so i know where they put it). but she says she got it, like three weeks ago, so it's too late to look for a needle prick. the red flag for me is that she says she hasn't had a bf in a few years, and that she just got the shot for the first time. before that, she says she was on the pill. so, my question is... why are you suddenly changing birth control? maybe i'm being paranoid, but it just seems strange.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 09:31 PM
1

yeah, duh. there are many such cases. more men need to understand this. the opinion of the courts is that once a woman is in possession of your sperm, it is her property to do with as she pleases! get that thru your fucking head, guys! and, of course, decisions will always be made in the best interest of the child, not you. edit after downboats: were you guys under the impression i thought this was a good thing?! i meant guys need to get this thru their heads because they need to protect themsel…
/r/MensRights01/02/11 09:11 PM
1

ok, first of all, don't slap her. a crazy bitch yelling at you in public should be handled just like anyone else who flies off the handle like that. you make it clear that you won't stand for that kind of shit and she needs to pipe the fuck down and get out of your face. ignoring the person (female or otherwise) is not a solution, and only serves to solidify your reputation as a victim. edit: PS not to shift the blame onto you, but you may want to ask yourself what it is about you that makes peo…
/r/MensRights31/01/11 12:17 AM
0

right. that's totally the same thing. here ya go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_analogy
/r/MensRights09/01/11 02:33 AM
1

a divorce?! just for that?! dude, she hid it from you because she was ashamed and embarrassed. for some reason, she feels that she can't come to you about certain things... ಠ_ಠ not saying this is your fault, but dude.. you're supposed to be in a partnership here. that being said, are you in a community property state? if so, you may not be able to separate your finances. that's part of getting marriage in most states: sharing everything including debt. one good reason i recommend a man never eve…
/r/MensRights08/01/11 08:57 PM
3

i already wrote to the huffpo in response to previous articles, saying they're essentially becoming an anti-male hate speech site. no response.
/r/MensRights28/12/10 06:49 PM
0

that will almost guaranteed not be in this man's best interests. if he's just itching to be the kid's dad, then go for it. i took from this that he did NOT intend to impregnate the woman (especially considering he's planning to marry someone else). since the mother has all the control over whether a kid is conceived and born (both biologically and legally), i took from this that she coerced him into fatherhood against his will! this happens all too often and is unfortunately a perfectly legal fo…
/r/MensRights25/12/10 02:39 AM
-2

step one, restraining order. step two, order for paternity test. if it's not his, then walk away... nothing more to do (hire a lawyer anyway, just in case). if it is his, keep restraining order, never talk to the kid or the mother. figure out how to minimize salary in order to minimize child support (being self-empoyed really helps with this). finally, move on, and stop fucking psycho girls. EDIT: BTW, the time to deal with this was when she got knocked up, not when the kid's about to be born. h…
/r/MensRights24/12/10 08:44 PM
-2

because men don't deserve rights, obviously. OP, have a pat on the back. would the reception be as warm if your post was something like "niggers aren't so bad, after all." thanks for finally coming around.
/r/MensRights24/12/10 01:25 AM
2

sorry, guys.. i can't seem to find this. if anyone can successfully google it, please post a link here. basically, like i said, the phrase in latin means "if you behave as if" or "if you act as though" ... something like that, then "you are." the specific case i remember is a guy who helped out his pregnant, then young mother neighbor by shopping for her. she didn't get out of the house much, etc.. so he would go buy milk and diapers and shit for the newborn. when courts got involved for whateve…
/r/MensRights23/12/10 09:49 PM
7

yes, it's horrible and true. this is in reference to a particular story i read. i'll try and find it for you.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 10:58 PM
10

so what? that's the law here. once you sign that birth certificate, you are "admitting" paternity. that's it. what is "discovered" after that means fuck all (to use your parlance). but it gets worse than that. even if it's "discovered" before the birth that the baby isn't yours, you can still be given full responsibility (financially), if you so much as bought diapers or helped decorate the nursery. there's a word for it in law. it's a latin phrase i can't remember now but basically means "if yo…
/r/MensRights22/12/10 09:57 PM
1

there's a word for guys like that. they're called pussies. i don't feel sorry for them. i'm guessing OP should spend more time on /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 07:45 PM
2

nah.. i don't think this conversation had much to do with your dad being a white dude. if he weren't, the boss would have just thought of some other dick head thing to say.
/r/MensRights18/12/10 05:22 AM
-4

plus girls are gross and have cooties!
/r/MensRights08/11/10 10:26 PM
3

i sent an email to [email protected], asking for an apology for this garbage. probably won't do any good. i expressed my revulsion in the comments section of the article page, but the moderators deleted or did not approve it. i didn't use foul language or anything like that, merely said that it bordered on hate speech and was very offensive. someone else in the comments mentioned that similar comments were being deleted. makes me wonder just what sort of site the huff po is exactly. when t…
/r/MensRights08/11/10 10:23 PM
1

it's hate speech, and i'm complaining to huff po about it.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 09:40 PM
1

i was wondering the same thing. this still doesn't explain the quotes (single quotes at that) around the word false. if the point is that false rape reports do happen, then quotes around the word have the opposite of the intended effect. it made the title very confusing to me.
/r/MensRights18/10/10 04:56 PM
1

this was most likely a mistranslation. in context, it's pretty clear he was saying that gay rights is not an issue in iran the way it is in the US. he wasn't denying that gays exist altogether. even he's not that credulous. here's a good treatment of the topic: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18471.htm
/r/MensRights23/09/10 05:27 PM
1

lol, so true! bottom line: you don't wanna know the truth, and her story's gonna be bullshit anyway.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 07:02 PM
1

gotcha.. i'm always reminded of kevin smith's line in chasing amy when he says something like "you don't wanna know, you just have to know... ya know, stupid guy bullshit." i always remind myself of that when i get the urge to ask a girl about her past, etc. some things you're better off not knowing.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 06:04 PM
3

you can always marry her again?? WTF?
/r/MensRights22/09/10 04:31 PM
0

sure it does. a marriage annulment is a no-brainer if it hasn't been consummated with sex. in these cases, no other fraud, abuse, or anything else need be proved. simply the fact that sex has not been had is cause for annulment.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 04:31 PM
3

if he's getting an annulment, what's the difference who she is or isn't screwing? calling up her friends and yelling at them is a terrible idea. OP should just distance himself as quickly and completely as possible.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 04:24 PM
1

ANNUL!!!! and go see an asset protection attorney. you can probably setup a trust very quickly and transfer your valuables into it. the way it will work is you need a settler (someone you trust, not you) and you would be the trustee and beneficiary. so, you don't own the stuff, but you have total control of it. or, if you have someone you can totally trust (like a parent), you can transfer ownership of your valuables to them. basically, you need to be broke on paper to be totally safe. BTW, the …
/r/MensRights22/09/10 04:18 PM
4

yep.. getting married in this country essentially sets you up for indentured servitude (which is supposed to have been outlawed). unfortunately, it sounds like you and your siblings are going to have to support your dad for the rest of your mother's life. you need to setup some sort of financially untouchable scenario. e.g., a trust of which, say, you are the trustee and executor, and your dad is the beneficiary. fix it so your dad's work generates money for the trust, not for himself. the trust…
/r/MensRights06/09/10 06:58 PM
2

np, good buddy. ;o) actually, we chatted for like two hours on FB!
/r/MensRights01/09/10 09:47 PM
3

why would you knock up a religious person?
/r/MensRights01/09/10 06:30 PM
5

of course she can. men do not have reproductive rights, unfortunately. it's probably the only legal form of fraud. remember, when it comes time to pony up child support and all that, the court will do whatever is in the best interest of the child; and throwing the baby's mother in jail is not in its best interest.
/r/MensRights31/08/10 11:44 PM
1

hey, fair enough. i certainly don't consider myself part of the "online feminist community"... i definitely was personally offended by it. but maybe i should just get over it. it was a punch in the stomach, tho. OOch!
/r/MensRights30/08/10 11:48 PM
1

haha.... good for US! i did pretty much the same. I think I basically plagiarized the top comment here, saying this was hate speech and so on. And I told her I notified wordpress.com that they were hosting a hate blog and so on. I tried not to use ad hominem attacks, only attacking her argument, not her personally. I didn't go on and on, and I wasn't rude (I don't think). I've gotten a ton of flack on this comments board about this, about censorship and so on. And I get that concern... believe m…
/r/MensRights30/08/10 11:01 PM
1

whatcha mean?
/r/MensRights30/08/10 10:47 PM
1

yes, that would be wonderful. unfortunately, that's just naivety at work. just read the comments.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 10:46 PM
2

you say that like it's bad. this crazy shit is out there... who would you prefer was paying attention to it?
/r/MensRights30/08/10 07:34 PM
0

wtf? again, i don't want it taken down, and i don't believe it will be. i want them to send her a message/email/whatever, saying "hey! people are pissed off at this!" what's confusing here? if they do take it down, i would be just as pissed at that. i certainly didn't tattle in hopes of censorship. if you knew me, you wouldn't have said that. anyway, good discussion.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 07:17 PM
0

damn, all the downboats indicate i didn't word this right. when i said "that's not the point" i didn't mean that censoring her was the best thing to do. i meant the point of complaining to wordpress.com is to notify them, to let them do whatever it is they will do. if they choose to totally take her content down, i wouldn't agree with that either. i was thinking more like... an email from wordpress admins to her saying "hey, uh, we're getting a lot of complaints... you might wanna tone it down."…
/r/MensRights30/08/10 06:58 PM
3

again, i don't think anyone is suggesting that, necessarily. all i did was notify wordpress.com that they're hosting a hate speech blog. if they want to take it down, your beef is with them. i'm no fan of censorship, believe me. but doing nothing is no good either. what wordpress does about it is up to them. the point is to let this person know she's a bigot.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 06:45 PM
3

i love the phrase "males, as a class...." ya know, there's two kinds of people in the world. people who classify half the population of the world, and people who don't.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 06:33 PM
2

that's not the point. the point is to get this person admonished for her behavior, so that maybe she'll get the hint that this is just wrong. us debating behind her back is not helping anything.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 06:20 PM
1

i did it!! also, commented on the post itself. it's awaiting moderation.
/r/MensRights30/08/10 06:18 PM
7

is this writer retarded? it's a clinic in logic fallacies. right in the first point, "77% more likely to die in a car accident than women" therefore women are better drivers? WTF??? no, it couldn't be that men are MUCH more likely to be driving than women in the first place. what if half those men were slammed into by a badly driving woman? apparently, these possibilities did not enter the tiny little mind of this stupid author.
/r/MensRights16/08/10 05:55 PM
1

why would you make a list the other way around? it would be the longest list in the world.
/r/MensRights16/08/10 05:51 PM
3

i never thought that was the issue. i thought it was more of a "pick on someone your own size" kinda thing. in my mind, it's more damaging to kill a man since you're also destroying everyone who depends on the man. his wife, his kids, etc. they're now pan handling in the street. i also never understood why it's a tragedy when a kid dies in a tragic accident, but when an adult dies, that's not such a big deal. WTF? society has invested much more in the adult. twelve years of public school and so …
/r/MensRights06/08/10 11:31 PM
0

yyyyyyup. it's not a matter of disagreeing. to me, "disagree" means we each analyze a set of facts and come to our own conclusion. when the other side is delusional -- or flat out decides to make their point by wittingly lying -- that's not a disagreement. that's a bunch of assholes.
/r/MensRights28/07/10 08:30 PM
3

president obama dressed as uncle sam, pointing, with "i want your retirement account" and "nationalized retirement account" ... with a link to "learn more."
/r/MensRights26/07/10 10:04 PM
2

DNR; immediately clicked back because of crazy right-wing ad.
/r/MensRights26/07/10 07:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter