TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rottingchrist Archive

View 0 posts and 2,809 comments by rottingchrist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,809 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I hope her Marvel film flops really hard. She doesn't even look physically fit for a superhero role.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 10:29 AM
1

Feminism is simply women's political expression. Any place where women gather and discuss political issues will be feminist. It's how women "do politics".
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:44 AM
3

They deserve the erasure. What did they expect? That "m'lady will remember me fondly for helping her revolution". lol
/r/MensRights12/04/17 10:13 AM
4

So was bombing and terrorism for votes. Didn't stop the wyxmonz.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 03:41 AM
2

I'm in favour of people being allowed to speak whatever they want to and I don't want to restrict anyone's participation here. However, I have noticed in recent months a general shift towards alt-right kind of views. So I stopped commenting here, and the whole reason I even signed up on reddit was to comment in this sub. I don't post in feminist subs not because I might get banned, but because it's unpleasant to post there. I don't want to interact with people who go on about how my gender is ev…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 04:34 AM
2

I'm Indian. Most of my reddit history is posting in this sub over something like 4 years. I'm going to stop posting here now, after reading all these comments.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 09:39 AM
1

"The Empathetic Sex"
/r/MensRights28/12/16 04:45 PM
3

There are two women on my current team of five people, both hired by me. They're quite competent programmers and write good quality code, but all the really interesting programmers who worked with me who'd try cool approaches to problems, come up with elegant engineering ideas or just be childishly thrilled to try out new tech were all men.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 04:27 PM
9

Stopped where he said 1st and 2nd wave feminism were good. They weren't. 1st wave campaigned for voting rights for women, and only women, even though a lot of the rest of the population was unenfranchised. And they campaigned for it to be given to themselves without taking on the obligation of being conscripted. 2nd wave had all those feminist heroines like Dworkin, McKinnon, Steinem, Solanas, etc. It has been an anti-male movement against boys and men from the very first day, when they didn't w…
/r/MensRights28/12/16 03:21 AM
1

Why should bicycles be expected to care for the rights of fish?
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:13 PM
1

Not related to men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 11:55 AM
2

First wave feminism: All men have oppressed us for millennia. Give us the franchise without the obligation of being conscripted, unlike the men, so that we may be "equal". Second wave feminism: the home is literally a concentration camp for women, all hetero sex is rape, woman and men are as similar as fish and bicycles. Nah, it's been an anti-male hate-fest against boys and men from the very first day.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 04:43 AM
10

The entitled gender is entitled. As simple as that.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:51 AM
1

Then get off your fucking asses like women have done and make some change in the world instead of whining about it. Women saying this to the gender that is responsible for almost all inventions, scientific advancement, protection of societies in wars and disasters, and practically all of modern civilization. The gender without whose help and knowledge they couldn't even fucking masturbate properly. "Like women have done". Pfft.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 04:49 AM
7

They will be anything if it gets them special treatment.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 02:25 AM
4

Feminists didn't carry the election for Hillary. Their political power is broken. Trump achieved a relatively narrow victory. Demographics are changing and a lot of younger voters are sympathetic towards feminist politics. The jury's still out imo on how much power feminists still wield.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 11:44 AM
0

Not a men's rights issue. It's not men's health being affected.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 01:35 AM
1

They don't actually have to earn less to lie about being paid less.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 01:19 AM
1

There are domestic violence shelters in Australia for pets but not for males.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:03 AM
1

not being responsible for their own actions actually demeans them. No it doesn't "demean" then. It elevates them as a higher class of people who can get away with things that others can't.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:02 AM
1

That's wishful thinking. Plenty of dishonest feminists in STEM fields too.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 02:55 AM
2

I don't know why male voters care so much about the abortion issue. Regardless of what the situation for women is, for men reproductive rights remain non-existent. And it's not like women support boys and men's issues in return. Men supporting women's suffrage did not in 100+ years inspire women to support removal of military conscription/registration for men for their enfranchisement. Male voters should save their energy and enthusiasm for male issues, like women do for women's issues and remai…
/r/MensRights29/11/16 02:33 AM
3

It seems so instinctive, doesn't it? It occurred so naturally to a 13 year old female to simply falsely accuse a boy of rape.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 03:31 AM
2

Some do. There is a fair amount of manga/hentai/porn out there with that theme.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 02:01 AM
2

Goes by the username oneiorosgripwontstfu here I think.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:43 AM
1

I don't know about men. Pretty sure it's a very small minority of men who fantasize about being the rapist. The normal fantasy is to be desired by women, not them being repulsed by you and trying to get away. Personally, I've never ever fantasized about that.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:36 AM
1

Men's rights advocacy should exist, but far too often it turns into anti-women instead of pro-men's issues. As long as people are made aware of the issues and they're addressed, I don't really care. What the fishes think of bicycles or their issues doesn't really matter.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 02:35 AM
6

You can agree with feminist ideology without explicitly calling yourself a feminist.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 06:09 AM
6

That site's traffic is overwhelmingly from women. It's no surprise.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 05:01 AM
2

Not a men's rights issue. It is ultimately up to the woman right now anyway, if that abortion decision gets overturned, it will be up to the state. Men still won't be in control of their reproductive rights, so supporting it in some sort of misguided "if women can abort there won't be as many children to support" trickle-down way is really sad. Men should throw their support behind legal paternal surrender for men, and remain neutral on women's issues.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 11:39 PM
1

Yep. One thing that gives me hope about men's rights is that men come up with solutions for problems. As long as men are aware that problems exist, they will try and solve them regardless of what the other gender thinks. Hoping that the fish will someday care about the issues of bicycles will get us nowhere. Making men aware of the issues that exist will inspire solutions to those issues.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 11:06 PM
7

He seems a bit socially awkward, was severely bullied as a kid and seems to stutter and look quite nervous during his presentations. Maybe he doesn't really know how to date properly.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 04:17 AM
6

At least you have options. They'll never be satisfied. Despite virtually all those options for them being developed by male scientists. Does anyone seriously believe that the gender most associated with qualities like stoicism, bravery and determination is going to be put off by the prospect of mood swings and acne? It's just another chance that the "empathetic gender" pounced upon with glee to spew their inherent hatred. I am not surprised at all by their behaviour regarding this news. It's alm…
/r/MensRights06/11/16 10:24 AM
2

Role model for women.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 02:26 AM
4

I've always thought it was clearly for awareness and raising money for prostate cancer?
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:49 AM
8

... for whatever reason, I don't know It's well known that fishes don't care about the issues of bicycles. I only wish it was the case the other way around too.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:47 AM
8

Yeah, I've seen her shut down some "but muh old feminism was good" shitposters on Reddit, but I don't think she's made a video about feminism being rotten since its inception. Would be a good topic for one of her videos.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 04:48 AM
2

Talk is cheap, let's wait for some concrete policy or law changes.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 01:59 AM
28

More likely she is going to have loads of friends who she can spend all that free money with.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:58 AM
2

It's a shitty feminist sub that sees like 1 post a day. Don't give it any attention, it will die off in a few months.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 01:47 PM
17

women can't compete with porn When you as a partner can't even compete with lewd pictures and clips, maybe you are just not worthy of being a partner.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 01:44 PM
7

He doesn't have MRA "roots". He's a conservative and now that men's rights is gaining a little traction he's buying in a bit. It's great that he's speaking on behalf of men and shutting up misandrists like in this video, but he isn't an MRA as such.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 02:24 AM
1

Let me know if I missed any. Lack of empathy towards males.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:27 AM
2

White knights are lowlifes.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 01:49 PM
5

Women love censorship.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 01:22 PM
1

So, they said "why do you have to feel satisfied to stand up for that?" The Entitled Gender demanding unconditional support for their pet issues.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 07:59 AM
2

There's an overwatch character called tracer who had a victory pose that triggered feminists because she's with her back to the camera and it shows her butt. See this. The pose on the right is what blizzard changed it to after the feminist uproar. The second pose shows off her butt as well as has her in a prancing pinup girl pose, which imo is more sexual than the first, but the feminists seemed to be happy with this change. Some think blizzard trolled the feminist complainers by putting her int…
/r/MensRights30/09/16 12:24 AM
9

They deleted all your comments because they disagreed with them.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 11:16 AM
13

No, us posting there would be considered brigading. We can't do that. Also, I don't think most people here see much value in arguing with feminists. They're set in their beliefs and it would be pointless to engage with them.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 08:20 AM
4

The Entitled Gender.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 03:11 AM
3

judge says she is "considering either a suspended prison term or a community order" They look out for their own.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 02:06 AM
2

Nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 09:34 AM
1

The Entitled Sex.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 05:27 AM
15

It is still a feminist shithole. Sometimes a bit of sense emerges from the posters but it's either ignored, deleted or shouted down.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 01:01 AM
2

If only they opposed male circumcision also as strongly. Though I'm sure they do oppose male circumcision too in more numbers than women.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 06:14 AM
3

Yeah, because those doing the fighting were male. It's easier to send people off to war when you can't imagine yourself in their shoes.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 04:50 AM
-1

No relation to men's rights.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 02:10 PM
2

The label makes no difference if they still support the same ideas.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 04:08 PM
8

I can't believe almost 50% of women are anti-equality. Nearly 100% of them were anti-equality on the draft issue for 150+ years and still are. 50% is an under-estimate, IMO.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:26 AM
1

You still have to realize that a white knight male may end up being on the wrong side of policies like these and come to his senses. That chances of that happening with a non-male politician are miniscule.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:24 AM
3

It doesn't matter if "only 20% women are feminists" when they support things like these. I'd say 50% is a conservative estimate.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:22 AM
5

So how are the feminists generally lined up on this issue? Women in general, including feminists, didn't oppose it for the 150 years since they started agitating for enfranchisement, except for the one feminist protest some 30+ years ago. In addition to this they went out and handed white feathers and called boys who couldn't vote and who didn't enlist in WW1 and 2 as cowards. Going by their actions, it's pretty clear what their stance is, despite what they may tell you. Actions speak louder tha…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:07 AM
-1

Agreed, I don't see the connection.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 06:52 AM
2

The sisterhood is stronger than the mother-son bond. It's also why they tend to comfort their female children more.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:08 AM
5

It's OK if it were an "attack on women". The strong, independent, fish that don't need bicycles gender can handle it.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:22 PM
3

No relation to men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 07:15 AM
1

Why do you think this is happening? From previous studies, it seems that women and men are both biased in favour of women. I don't know if that can be changed.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 07:14 AM
4

So? As far as I know, Trump isn't anti-male (even if he may or may not be a lot of other things), so I don't know why this sub should actively disapprove of whatever she is saying. MRAs supporting a candidate that isn't obviously anti-male? I don't see a problem.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 04:16 AM
2

Democratic activists Jack Teter and Kyle Huelsman There is nothing in this world lower than a male feminist.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 04:02 AM
4

We can't really jump to conclusions.... what did the mother do to provoke this from a 6 year old???? /s
/r/MensRights03/06/16 03:59 AM
3

A true feminist would actually set off a bomb than just threaten to.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 03:27 AM
2

Yep. Is "protecting our women" a men's rights issue now? I'm also pretty sure women are the largest voting bloc in Sweden and can influence policy for their own interests, so don't know why this topic belongs here.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 10:24 AM
0

I agree that it is a misandric sub. And that reaction to niceness should tell you that being nice is an effort that is wasted upon many people.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 03:38 AM
2

Suffrage without offering to shoulder the same obligations as males. It was their first issue, and they (and women in general, who are the majority of voters) have maintained their double-standard on it for 150 years now.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 03:02 AM
1

Not necessarily. Though I'm sure that's a popular motivation. But some are so far gone that they don't actually think they're included in the "men" that feminists and women in general talk about. There was a thread in change my view about society becoming better if males were made to disappear and there was a guy in that thread actually supporting that and claiming he'd do whatever is necessary to make a society like that work. He clearly didn't consider himself among the males that would no lon…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 02:49 AM
2

Society-wide ransom. Classy.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 01:30 AM
1

"Equal pay for work of equal value" They can't attach their name in writing to an obvious lie about wxmon not being paid the same for equal work, so they get creative with words. Disgusting party. Isn't this the same party that had that distressed damsel develop PTSD from an elbow nudge?
/r/MensRights30/05/16 06:08 AM
-1

Has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 05:52 AM
1

They already know that. It's more convenient for them to pretend otherwise. Posts like these are pointless.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 05:34 AM
3

Thanks, but we don't need you or your concern. Please go away.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 02:01 AM
1

Just her disgusting rape and exhibitionism fetish.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 01:45 AM
5

You had the same attitude towards blasphemy back when religion was taught to children. You teach a doctrine of privilege (original sin) and ultimate evil (patriarchy and structures of racism and oppression), and people will follow it like they did religion and will tolerate no blasphemy against it.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 04:10 PM
19

At this rate, I think that men should neither expect nor rely on women to stand up for freedom Most of them can be relied upon to stand up for "women's freedom". You have to understand, these restrictions they support are not expected to apply to their interests. Just like that recent Harvard student group matter about allowing women into men's groups but not vice-versa. They were shocked by the very possibility that it could be applied to them. That is the mentality. To them, expecting the same…
/r/MensRights24/05/16 12:15 PM
1

And how do you know she doesn't call herself a feminist? She seems to be against the demonization of males, in at least this case. So, it stands to reason that she isn't a feminist.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 08:00 AM
0

take away the advancements in science to women Please. Nobody is taking anything away.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 03:53 AM
1

Men should simply stop participating in all research on women's medical issues. No matter how much you give them, birth control, lower mortality during childbirth, feminine hygiene products, etc. their reaction will largely be like that of this author. Fucking couldn't even manage masturbation without males helping them out.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 02:50 AM
2

Victimhood must be like a drug for women. Look at how desperate they are to turn an inadvertent elbow nudge into almost-rape!!!!!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights21/05/16 11:51 AM
1

the only issue you may encounter is that they don't necessarily (that i know of) subscribe to patriarchy theory They do. From the 1848 [Declaration of Sentiments] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Sentiments#Opening_paragraphs): The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. It is a fundamental belief of their ideology.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 07:11 AM
1

wait you think first wave is...antimale? Yes. I just gave you an example of them explicitly excluding males from their very first meeting. The luminaries of the "first-wave" also had a lot to say about how [men are destructive] (http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/stanton.htm). You may want to excuse their actions, but to me they are anti-male. The simple right to vote? The simple right to vote for women, not everyone. The suffragettes for example, shamed men who couldn't vote into being conscr…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 03:53 AM
1

Safe spaces is a social justice thing not a fem thing. SJW nonsense is built upon the feminist concept of intersectionality. And "spaces for women", which others who aren't women are excluded from, have long been a staple of feminism. From 1848: Even though the first session had been announced as being exclusively for women, some young children of both sexes had been brought by their mothers, and about 40 men were there expecting to attend. Third wave is starting to be viewed as a failed... Four…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 03:37 AM
1

He's probably going a bit senile.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:53 AM
1

Who cares? It's fiction.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:41 AM
4

No, she's an attention-seeking sociopath. She needs to be in jail, not a mental health institution.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:25 AM
10

literally this isn't some universal viewpoint of all feminists It literally is because they are big on ideological purity and safe spaces. Anyone not having the same viewpoint is labelled a misogynist and excommunicated. Banned and blocked. there's a reason we have 'first-wave', 'second-wave', 'third-wave' etc feminists New packaging for the same old thing.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 12:55 AM
16

#NotAllFeminists This after gamers being on the receiving end of shitty treatment for 2 years from feminists across the media and right up to the UN. Please. EDIT: I thought this topic was in /r/KotakuInAction, that's why I mentioned gamers. Feminist attitudes towards men have been shitty since it began, not just over the past 2 years.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 12:15 AM
3

Some of the most batshit insane post-modern "scholars" come from France. They also generally love feminism.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 02:25 AM
1

"Serious environmental issue? How can women use this to augment our victim status?"
/r/MensRights18/05/16 12:27 PM
9

What a disgusting sense of entitlement. Nobody owes female actors their patronage. I didn't really care about that film since I'm not a Ghostbusters fan, but after seeing the attitudes of those involved with the film, I hope it is an unprecedented flop.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 03:31 AM
2

'I am trying to change my personal opinion that most men want to rape women and can only stop themselves through the hard work and cautiousness of women, but that one rapist in the news makes it difficult...' That is already a common belief among women and is especially widespread in the political movement that represents them, so I don't see what's so terrible about a few males having an unflattering belief about women.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 03:12 AM
2

click.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:50 AM
20

These are her words on her male child's suicide: "After a lifetime of acting as my boy’s life coach, ATM and personal maid, I had had enough," "Finally I peeled his drowning fingers off of me and saved myself..."
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:35 AM
1

The complete hypocrisy and apparent lack of empathy for males leads me to think that a very large portion of them don't. I read that it's common for mothers to comfort daughters more and such. It's not unlikely that women are not particularly distressed about their male children having to sign up for military service but are if their daughters are required to. It's probably also easier for them to imagine themselves in the daughter's shoes and therefore empathize more with her.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 02:26 AM
2

It's only a "bag of cells" anyway, so it can be doused with alcohol until it pops out. Administering alcohol to it after it has stopped parasitizing le womxn is expressly forbidden however.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 01:28 PM
1

"Green parties" in most countries are openly anti-male. I expect the American one to be no different.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 01:24 PM
1

Leopards, you need to change your spots.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 02:30 AM
9

No shit. Men have a history of trying to "give up worldly things", dealings with women being one of the foremost of those worldly things. Entire religions have been founded upon trying to free men of worldly desire.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 03:10 PM
5

We discussed the extent to which women had … rape fantasies. You know, it happened. Many of us, almost every one of us did. That explains almost everything.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 02:58 PM
2

I have words of advice for men observing the day with the mother of their children: Do more. If you’re debating between a spa gift certificate and flowers, get both. If you were planning to take the kids out in the morning so she could rest, take them out for the afternoon, too. It's never enough for these people, is it? The entitlement never ends. Biological parasites must be less demanding.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 05:15 AM
3

Sarkeesian are quite thin. You could've picked a better example. She's a roly-poly little bag of feminist hatred.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 04:15 AM
9

No, that real man deal is shitty for a lot of males.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 11:27 AM
1

What's the incentive to care? So far, none. Unless their social position depends upon that sort of caring it isn't going to happen. This is why I say that men should show the same amount of support for women's issues as women do men's. i.e. mostly indifference with opposition outweighing support in the case that they must choose. It's not going to happen until men withhold their support and only offer it when compensated with similar support. Far too many men out there who get passionate over wo…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 10:44 AM
1

Whatever, entitled twerp. Boys don't owe you an audience and are well within their rights to choose to not patronize your bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 10:08 AM
5

women in government end all wars It's harder to send someone off to die when you can imagine yourself in their shoes. If anything, there will be more wars since they are still going to make males do all the fighting. Wasn't there an article from some time ago that showed that female rulers are more likely to start wars?
/r/MensRights05/05/16 09:21 AM
2

They also find it perfectly fine for their own sons to have to People overrate "motherly love". The son is, at the end of the day, a male.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 09:18 AM
2

To each their own but it's a show about high school and vampires. Absolutely no surprise why it'd be so popular among womyn. See twilight for a similar phenomenon.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:40 PM
2

Thanks for sharing your experiences. I hope it serves as a cautionary example to others here.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:30 PM
1

And Meg Ryan. All three seem the same person to me.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 11:56 AM
6

The victim wasn't male though, so perhaps they won't be let off easy.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:38 AM
2

'forced another boy's hand into the dead child's mouth then said: You've killed him' Blaming the nearest male, as always.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 07:28 AM
1

There would be more wars because they'd still send men to fight them and it's easier to send someone off to die if you can't easily imagine yourself in their shoes.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 03:21 PM
1

women dare work on their own issues without including men's each time? They do that anyway regardless of what men think.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 03:00 PM
-1

It's not our issue and many men are neutral on it. You aren't entitled to men's support for your pet issues.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:50 PM
1

Hatred of men is an integral part of feminism. Always has been. From the earliest "wave" to the latest one.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 07:41 AM
2

They have a hard time thinking of males as human.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 03:12 AM
1

It's probably a bot. And very likely coded by a man, because you know... coding.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:02 AM
24

As usual they get their henchmen to do it.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 08:45 AM
1

lol yussss
/r/MensRights19/04/16 12:50 AM
1

A draft will never happen again, so there's no negative to registering. Why not have women register too then?
/r/MensRights16/04/16 05:01 AM
1

Fairness and sacrifice are male virtues.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 04:57 AM
1

late Jean Marie Le Pen late?
/r/MensRights14/04/16 08:07 AM
4

girl, then aged 15, had launched a "personal campaign” against paedophiles and had previously arranged to meet two men she had found online in the hope they would be arrested. Of course, proxy violence.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 07:56 AM
1

Excuse me, but I don't think being a base-level good human being deserves to be treated as anything fucking special. True, but it's still more than I expect from them, so it's nice.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 12:04 PM
2

Female trolls require different tactics to counter. They like to form their little online cliques and are more vulnerable to social ostracism, or being made to feel like a social reject. And it always must come down to personal ridicule with them. Who is the wrong person matters a lot more than who is the one saying the wrong things.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 12:00 PM
1

Yeah but he had fame and wealth and the right politics for women.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 10:48 AM
2

it scares me.....the hate.... I don't want to be afraid..... show me somewhere that explains it that is not completely terrifying? Disgusting victim narrative. If it "scares" you, go away. No one is keeping you here.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 08:36 AM
3

Be a womyn.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 08:07 AM
2

I suspect she'd have received a harsher sentence if the victim wasn't a male child.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 07:57 AM
7

There was no "moving". It has been anti-male since day one.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 03:33 AM
6

And "their share" of the financial support provided to the children by the father.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 02:00 PM
1

Or, you know... we could stop telling women that they should be afraid all the time... If being among the safest demographics doesn't reduce their paranoia, someone telling them they shouldn't be afraid isn't going to work. because I'm sure that more men were victims of violence then women... They see that as irrelevant because they aren't concerned about violence against people but specifically violence against those of their gender.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 06:59 AM
1

Women's "Humour".
/r/MensRights03/04/16 11:21 AM
0

I guess they could always accuse someone of rape to get out of the contract...
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:54 AM
2

They support and help their own.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:40 AM
3

I can understand if they do. Look around you at what men have built and continue to build despite being considered to have no inherent worth.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:32 AM
1

I travel in crowded public transport. I am very grateful for separate women's coaches because I definitely don't need the drama during early morning commutes. Unfortunately, at the moment I am staying in another city where the women don't seem to stick to their own coaches and will board the non-female ones regularly. It's quite noticeable too when most men will not take the vacant seat next to a woman. They prefer to stand. This happens on both buses and trains.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 02:26 AM
1

As soon as you ask the average libertarian if they want their borders free so corporations have the economic freedom to replace the host population with cheap labour because thats best for the market, they stop being libertarians at that point ... or blame government for free market immigration. I agree, but this is no different to your average socialist who goes on about workers of the world uniting and socialism being international, then yells at immigrants to stop "stealing his job" and fuck …
/r/MensRights28/03/16 01:57 AM
1

Eh... this is just further pandering to his voter base. I guarantee he raises his sons to be exactly like himself, disingenuous politicians.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 01:54 AM
13

One is a wish, the other actually happened?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 03:43 PM
10

Someone in danger of missing out on their Mrs. degree?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:48 PM
6

Women being women.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 12:30 PM
6

And this is AskWomen not AskFeminists. Every "women's space" will end up like this.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 04:32 PM
1

What's depressing is that so many males will still vote for her.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:11 AM
4

The comments are depressing. Pathetic white knights going on about crap like "but this isn't feminism, feminism is muh daughter liking science". None so blind as those who will not see.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 08:56 AM
2

Thankfully, the proposed challenge was removed. I think it should've been left up as an example of a feminist view.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:06 PM
6

Unrelated to men's rights.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 02:46 PM
1

Why the fuck are women even opining on a day that doesn't fucking concern them?
/r/MensRights17/03/16 12:12 PM
1

I don't see any problem.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:09 AM
4

"Society would be better if those who build and run civilization 'disappeared'". "the best way to convince me I am mistaken is to write up a scenario where all women suddenly die, and convince me a society of all men would be better" Wellll.... all that would need is the development of some sort of "synthetic egg" for gestation of humans. And we're talking of the inventive powers of a gender that managed to visit the moon... 50-odd years ago. I wouldn't be so convinced about women's "value" to h…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:21 AM
5

No.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:15 AM
1

The sisterhood looks out for their own.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 02:03 AM
-8

Shoe0nhead is anti men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 07:50 AM
1

Archive. He doesn't like his stuff posted here.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 03:07 AM
2

Men don't owe women their attention. Or anything really.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 02:03 PM
4

Eh... they just know their market well. Guess who are the heaviest users of chatterbox apps?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:11 AM
3

Yep. I didn't really have any strong feelings about the Ghostbusters remake until I saw all the feminut cheerleading and drama for it.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 03:31 AM
1

I don't really see the point. These are people who respond with "stay out of our uteruses" and "men know nothing about women's lived experiences" whenever males have anything to say about their issues. I say we respect their wishes and leave their issues to them.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 11:39 AM
-4

Not relevant to men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 10:19 AM
19

Apparently it is for womyn.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 07:28 AM
7

Give them more money, more rest, more holidays, free products and services, close all their prisons, etc. For equality. I don't even see how there could be an effective opposition to these demands when the biggest voting bloc is made up of those who benefit from all this. It's very, very demoralizing.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:46 AM
1

It certainly involves a lot more effort than not doing so.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:01 PM
1

I actually don't mind gender swaps and the like in fiction, and I'm not really a fan of Ghostbusters so I never had any strong feelings about this reboot. I don't really have anything against the film. I would've even checked it out if that trailer hadn't convinced me that it's yet another tired "grrrrrrrrrl powa fite d patriarchy" sermon. I go to the cinema to be entertained, not "educated".
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:56 AM
8

Men aren't facing a shit ton of pressure to have kids though. Men don't get asked about when they're going to have a child. This is false, but believe what you want.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:33 AM
4

Neither is having one, yet we have mothers day/ fathers day/grandmother day ect. Those don't celebrate having children, but raising them.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:32 AM
3

That's damned ironic, considering the fact that a lot of men in this subreddit don't support women's issues. How is it ironic? You were incensed by the idea that anyone would hope for women to support something on behalf of men. I only wish that more men had a similar outlook on women's issues. That some here already do is a good thing. Besides, there are far too many here who trot out their support for abortion every time that issue comes up in this sub. I wish they'd become neutral and direct …
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:28 AM
4

56 year old men having children with younger (pre-menopausal) women is not a common occurrence. Most men partner with someone around their age and a 50+ year old woman is almost never capable of birthing children. I've personally been under immense pressure in the past to have children. Not having children is not something heroic or deserving of appreciation.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:54 AM
3

Why isn't one of the male politicians she works with suggesting a fatherless men's day... Or do you need women to put those ideas forth on your behalf? I agree that it is foolish to expect social and political support for issues involving boys and men from non-male groups. I only wish more males realized it and took up neutral positions on women's issues.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:33 AM
8

None of that is only applicable to women, so this MP is still completely wrong.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:38 AM
8

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:28 AM
1

Friendship is wasted on those who consider it rape.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 10:29 AM
3

Feminists don't hate men. They declared males collectively the enemy when they began their movement in 1848: The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. Unless you want to claim that it's some sort of "hate the sin, love the sinner" situation, feminists very clearly do hate males. It is a foundational pillar of their movement.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 09:54 AM
3

People have an instinctual revulsion to boys and men complaining about unfairness or problems.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 09:50 AM
2

Relation to men's rights?
/r/MensRights04/03/16 09:45 AM
2

I try to mimic this sort of contempt and condescension sometimes. But I'm only a male so it never reaches the levels of perfection seen here. Such pure disgust at a man breathing, and it's so effortless and natural sounding.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 07:02 AM
3

Your post sounds more like damage control for left-wing politics and feminism than genuine concern, tbh. I understand that there are some unsavory comments on the sub from time to time, but opposition to anti-male politics (much of which comes from feminism, and left-wing politics overwhelmingly supports feminism with almost no reservations) is not unreasonable. You do see similar opposition to right-wing traditionalist politics as well, on matters like the military draft.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 07:22 AM
2

Even white supremacists claim they're merely "preserving european culture". You can claim to be anything, what matters is what you do.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 11:18 AM
1

It's an attempt to associate toxicity and negative qualities like violence, bullying, etc. explicitly with being male. Women do not have this "toxic masculinity" that apparently causes so many social ills. It's a term clearly designed to demonize boys and men and blame them explicitly for problems in society. It makes me sad when I see so many males buying into it.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:59 AM
0

You got their dialect spot on haha.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 01:38 AM
2

Being top of the social ladder is really fucking hard. And a social ladder implies that there are people towards the bottom. So even if those at the bottom can sustain themselves, they are still worthless because of all the others doing better than them. This is one of the reasons why I believe that social and class hierarchies will never go away. They're pretty important to female sexuality.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 05:10 AM
1

Leopards and spots.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 04:46 AM
-1

No, ALL feminism is cancer, not just modern.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:46 PM
8

Toxic feminity. The uncontrollable tendency to paint oneself as the victim at all times.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:44 PM
9

They do understand, they just don't care.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:57 AM
2

rescued Sure... I'd believe it if she hadn't escaped from her earlier "rescue" to answer her calling.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 02:06 AM
4

Don't let them. That's looking increasingly difficult with women speaking at the UN in favour of censorship and the biggest voting group in most democracies being women. I can very easily see a "women's issue" like "save women from internet (trigger warning!!!!) violence" winning widespread support among that group.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:49 AM
2

Simple past tense of wake. Though some weird people have been using it in place of "awake" these days.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 11:41 PM
3

1) Do you think feminism has valid points as well? Since it is built upon a foundation that holds males to be enemies of women: The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. No. It has no valid points, as far as I am concerned. I realize it's great for women and all since it pushes for women's interests, but it is actively hostile and hateful to boys and men. Kind…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 12:19 PM
2

I'm still confused as to how any of that could be passed. The largest voting demographic is female in many democratic nations. People are known to be supportive of policies that favour their own group and politicians tailor their policies accordingly.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 12:07 PM
3

It looks like a parrot. Can talk but makes little sense.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 11:47 AM
11

Women's violence against men.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 11:41 AM
2

Maybe it could be used to raise awareness that yes, men can be victims to violent women too and that it's awful how guys can be killed for such trivial reasons? I think raising awareness of that nature is important when so many people still propagate the "men's violence against wymxnz!!!!" and 1.7 women in 1 are killed by their partners hysteria.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 05:14 AM
1

GNOME, of course.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 04:54 AM
-3

The growth in misogynists is the result of the growing MGTOW and Redpill movements spilling into here. I agree that this is becoming a glaring problem. I am generally tolerant of uncharitable generalizations and even make some deliberate ones myself from time to time to highlight similar beliefs or similar snide insinuations among feminists. But of late there have been plenty of crass and openly hateful pronouncements from a few users like ovendiice. Which were upvoted as well. That needs to be …
/r/MensRights21/02/16 11:27 PM
6

Following one encounter with a feminist in which I said I did not get death and rape threats from men, a new account with a male name was suddenly set up which began sending me some. I wasn't expecting that level of honesty from someone who used to be (and still is, in some "but muh reeeeeeeal feminizum!!!" way) a feminist.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 12:49 PM
1

Well, abstinence only stuff is more advice than education.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 01:53 PM
0

Relation to men's rights?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:06 PM
1

So their "opposition" largely amounts to... working. What people do in peacetime anyway.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:34 AM
1

Belongs in /r/mensrants.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:33 AM
1

In a democratic nation, would that include the majority voting demographic that has generally been indifferent to the draft, if not outright supportive of it, for 100+ years because they aren't subject to it?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:32 AM
1

I don't know. But in the case of men, I do know.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:28 AM
9

White knighting is a social disease.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:13 AM
1

lol. cry more feminuts.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:58 AM
1

Not all women do it, but probably only because there are not enough invaders. S'ok. Polyamory is (or soon will be) a feminist issue.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 07:41 AM
2

Stick around, you'll know.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 06:47 AM
1

I agree with some points they claim to hold, yes. But I don't believe that they genuinely hold those view points. Like being against rigid gender roles. They are against them, but only for women. Likewise, claiming to want political equality with men, but only wanting to be politically equal when it's advantageous for themselves. But note the roots of their ideology. From 1848: The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation on the part of man toward woman, having in dire…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 06:19 AM
2

Do the men in that story in any represent the majority of soldiers in the same way... They would if there wasn't an infinitely larger number of allied soldiers who opposed the nazis.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 06:05 AM
4

They didn’t spend the entire time partying either. True. Some time they fondly spent with their new overlords, probably one-on-one. 'I'm almost ashamed to say it, but I've never had so much fun in my life,' said Madame Jamet. 'Those nights of the Occupation were fantastic.'
/r/MensRights18/02/16 05:35 AM
5

Rights for men. That's all. It actually doesn't have anything to do with women or feminism, but often opposition to men's rights comes from them so their opposition has to be considered for us to make any progress.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:02 AM
1

So you want to afford legitimacy to their rape culture claim, but only in the case of "rapefugees". How do you guarantee that once it has been given legitimacy it won't simply be applied to all men when they find it convenient to do so?
/r/MensRights12/02/16 01:24 PM
3

Women maintain unofficial "lists" anyway on other networks. They have never needed apps to carry on with the "do you know what he's like OMG!!!??" stuff. An app may be handy for that but hardly necessary.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 12:58 PM
1

Relevance to men's rights?
/r/MensRights12/02/16 12:52 PM
0

I hope this stops all that fawning over the dye-haired, Sarkeesian-fan, female my little pony cartoonist who apparently created that episode with a "straw feminist" villain.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 12:50 PM
1

No, the lead actress.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 11:05 AM
5

They can be honest sometimes.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:16 AM
1

I'm quite sure Google "curates" their search results. I remember there being a furore over a racist image of Obama's wife showing up high in the results some years ago which Google then "fixed". So there probably is a policy to doctor results to prevent offence to the professional victims.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 01:23 AM
1

I wouldn't go as far as saying that he isn't a friend. Perhaps just not a very good friend and OP should lower his expectations of friendly behavior from this guy a little.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 11:48 AM
3

Censorship being driven by members of the largest voting group (not men) is very much a men's rights issue. Especially when similar tactics are often applied to silence those speaking about men's issues.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 11:40 AM
4

Why is this downvoted? From what I understand, it's generally true in the US.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 11:17 AM
2

All that is well understood, but being apologetic or defensive never helps. It would be better for us to simply brush off the disingenuous smearing of the movement as the ravings of misandrists. The fault lies with them for trying to smear us.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 10:39 AM
4

Don't look for understanding from people who can't provide it. If you have any good male friends, they may be more sympathetic.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 10:30 AM
8

I guess a couple of years ago, once I got over the fear of being called a bad person for supporting male issues. I never was a feminist though. Their hatred towards boys and men has been clear to me since I was a teen. The movement is built upon hatred of males and is inseparable from it.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 02:40 PM
0

Just stop being so scared of that. People will call you a misogynist for posting in support of men anyway, whether someone in the sub applies an unflattering generalization to women or not.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 02:36 PM
1

I know of that film. Never watched it because I can't stand that actress.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:31 PM
4

There are enough desperate white knights in the world. See Anita Sarkeesian's scam. She has said that she won't be releasing any more of the stuff she got paid for. White knights are still queuing up to throw money at her.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:39 AM
42

Her and that fatty who molested her sister. And that other fatty who thinks women raping girls is "good rape". And if you follow what's been going on with Gamergate, feminists have doubled down on defending the paedophiles among their ranks there as well.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:37 AM
1

When we are no longer dependent on women for birthing children. Will it ever happen? I don't know. But lots of things we have now seemed impossible just a few centuries ago.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:37 AM
3

Not true, and its a common misconception unfortunately, while we in the MRA support mens rights, we don't by any means HAVE to support womens rights Agreed. Individually, everyone is welcome to support other social movements, but the MRM must maintain its focus on boys and men.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:34 AM
1

And you've seen how much success feminists have had. Is it really a bad idea to learn from them?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:33 AM
1

They also usually steered away from being classified into the misandric "riot grrrrrrrl" scene which the music press tried to shoehorn them into. Babes in toyland did that as well. Not really metal bands though.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:46 AM
4

I don't listen to death metal. Is misogyny actually common? See, the male metal bands who sing about gore and mutilation do it as a kind of musical horror, not as a genuine expression of political beliefs. On the contrary, a lot of metalheads have a huge problem with a bunch of black metal bands who incorporate racism into their songs. Because those bands are entirely serious about their hatred for Jews and other non-white people. I'm not really surprised by what the women's motivations to make …
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:41 AM
2

This case -- and continued feminist attempts to justify it -- should send a chill down the spine of every person who cares about free speech. Whether it's Anita at the UN arguing that her critics should be censored, or feminists on campuses "no-platforming" anyone who disagrees with them, I think one could make a pretty good case that feminism poses a direct threat to civil liberties. I've lost hope. Even after all this, people even here in this subreddit sometimes buy into the not all feminists…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:13 AM
13

Women and their sense of entitlement to male lives for their benefit.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:54 AM
3

They consider boys and men subhuman, that's why.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:53 AM
4

No thanks. Men don't owe you shit.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:50 AM
20

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:45 AM
1

Won't make any difference. Same hatred under a new name.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 01:32 AM
5

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:59 AM
5

Some tumblr-tard actually claimed in another case about a teen girl raping an 8 or so year old boy that no rape could have taken place because an 8 year old is unlikely to overpower a teen.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 02:17 PM
0

Me neither. Especially when it is selectively reserved for dogs and cats only. Maybe just a cultural difference. Personally, I just find cats very creepy.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:57 PM
3

I've said it before. Politicians couldn't dream of better allies for internet censorship. Terrorism scares failed to do it. Fake concern about children couldn't. Children don't vote. Now they have something to sell to the largest voting demographic. One that is paranoid about "violence against us" despite being under the least danger from it. I'm not optimistic.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:52 PM
3

The victim is a boy. The "fairer" sex against the disposable one. It's depressing but not surprising.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:40 PM
7

Rather the boy be aborted than be born to someone like that.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 03:56 PM
4

Just another sociopath politician picking up an issue to consolidate power. A majority of the electorate is female, so he'll say what they want to hear. I doubt he sincerely believes any of it himself and is probably another Hugo Schwyzer type.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 03:09 AM
4

No, dumbass. The link has been posted here to highlight the singling out of men by that politician. Even if he is concerned about Islam, he should have no reason to refrain from saying the same thing about Muslim women. But the issue here is the sexist targeting of men, which the MRM is against.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 02:21 PM
7

Because they provide the perfect excuses for power grabs. Weeeeeeminz are threatened by the internet, let's censor it. Black people are being lynched on campus, let's start a bunch of committees and programs to combat "racism" and pump money into them. Wombyn are being raped every second on campus, let's alter laws to remove the presumption of innocence. Feminists (SJWs) exist to justify the extension of power by institutions.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 02:15 PM
4

It was a typical 90s grrrrrl power show. The audience for it was likely 90+% female. I saw an episode, and both the titular character and her even more obnoxious roommate made sure that I'd never watch it again.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 02:09 PM
9

He's not a third wave feminist, but he isn't a gender egalitarian either. He is somewhere in between those two spectrums So a gynocentrist basically
/r/MensRights23/01/16 02:52 AM
3

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:24 PM
0

I would agree with allowing women in, except you know what will happen if they are. They'll be allowed in and then everything about the shed would be "misogynistic", there'll be accusations of sexual harassment, "women don't feel safe here", and finally "these sheds are hotbeds of sexism, misogyny and rape culture and need to be shut down". So yeah, keep it men only. It's better for everyone.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 01:03 AM
19

sassy_chick lol. You can tell what kind of person she is going by that nickname alone.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:18 AM
1

Eh... I can hardly believe the last 1 or so hour of Commando either where he guns down like 200 people while shooting from the hip. It's a movie, I can't be bothered to get too worked up about that.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 12:32 AM
2

The men's movement has been around for more than 100 years and has achieved little, so I'm not overly optimistic, but i think there has been at least some progress awareness-wise in recent years, though the laws have continued to worsen. I think we may achieve a few significant goals but those will be the ones that have little effect on women's interests, like circumcision and maybe abolishment of the draft. I don't think we'll make any appreciable progress in areas like family law reform, sente…
/r/MensRights20/01/16 03:06 AM
7

To be fair, printers are the fucking devil.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 02:20 AM
1

Tbh, shoe0nhead does the standard omgsorandomquirkyadhdgirlteehee brand of humour, which isn't really funny. And IIRC, she also has a typically traditional view of men. But she's attractive and supports Gamergate (which a lot of MRAs do as well) so they consider her to be supportive of men's issues even when that isn't entirely accurate.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 02:02 AM
3

And other household appliances, the birth control pill, safe childbirth that drastically reduced the mortality rate for both newborns and those who birthed them, and pretty much everything else. And they are rewarded with killallmen, #MaleTears, boys are stupid throw rocks at them, all men are rapists and all hetero sex is rape, cry me a river for all men who killed themselves, etc. by the self-proclaimed "empathetic sex".
/r/MensRights20/01/16 01:54 AM
5

Is frugality a gendered thing? Yes, yes it is.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 01:28 AM
7

Another thing that should be pointed out is that male MRAs are usually very grateful to female MRAs for supporting their issues, while feminists see male feminists as lower than dirt.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 02:03 PM
3

Empathy, compassion and forgiveness are masculine virtues.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 11:40 AM
44

Solipsism is toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 01:49 AM
5

No thanks. "Traditional" roles do not cure depression for men or grant immunity from it.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 01:47 AM
8

It's quite obvious because males do almost all of the fighting and it's easier to send someone you empathize less with to their death.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 01:14 AM
1

Suffragettes? Only campaigned for women's suffrage when many men couldn't vote either. It is a fundamentally anti-male ideology.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 01:01 AM
1

There are a lot of women in the room who may not be feminists. Acting like that certainly isn't restricted to feminists.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 03:06 AM
2

Likewise in the open source community and free services for people to use on the internet. Altruism is a masculine virtue.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:57 PM
2

What's funny is that the first wave of feminism was all about trying to disprove the idea of female frailty. No, it wasn't.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 06:59 AM
10

So any person with half a braincell can avoid her at all costs. Someone wifed her up, so that's one life ruined. Unless he is a desperate retard who willingly fucked his own life up.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 05:09 AM
0

and added that victims shouldn't have to be in classes with their rapists. So yeah. Explain to me how this guy is against the campus kangaroo courts? From what I understand, requiring the alleged assaults to be reported to the police would deter a few false accusations but guys would still be thrown out when falsely accused. Women making false reports to the police isn't something unheard of.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 02:04 AM
2

If you understand this this comes from people who are fundamentally anti-male, it's not shocking at all. That it will receive almost negligible opposition from the largest voting demographic shouldn't shock anyone either.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 02:24 AM
6

They made their bed.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 04:34 AM
6

They already criticize atheists and defend Islam. It's entirely possible that they'd team up with the religious if it helps their goals.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 04:30 AM
2

The problem with that is transgender women want to be acknowledged as women. Even when much of society affords them that, it will be because they've accepted them as women, and is unlikely to have an impact on men and masculinity. Legally yes, you may have favourable laws but that won't necessarily reduce the social stigma for boys and men.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 04:09 AM
1

Polygyny was common among richer men in ancient times. A lot of the time the only way you could find a partner as a common man was through military conquest as part of an army. Most migrations were through military conquest where the male victors would kill or enslave all the men of the conquered peoples and take the local women as wives.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 03:42 AM
5

Normalize it. That's the only way IMO. Hipsters already did a bit of that inadvertently with the super skinny jeans and scarves. Not a huge change but incremental. I think some techies (who are too valuable to be fired) are forcing dress code changes too by showing up to work in shorts and the like. It's a small change but significant in relaxing men's dress codes. That relaxation may lead to acceptance of more feminine clothing. Long hair too looks good on a lot of men, but the problem there is…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 03:23 AM
1

It was a case of a woman thinking with her cunt. A disgusting attempt at getting off with a rape fantasy where she is sooooo irresistible that a whole bunch of frat bros would cut themselves on broken glass just to have sex with her.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 03:10 AM
3

People don't apply the same standards to those who they think are subhuman.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 02:31 AM
12

And that they are threatened by machines that are basically glorified masturbation aids says a lot about what they actually offer in a relationship.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 02:29 AM
0

Well, I'd rather have my time wasted than be killed. I would like to thank women for slightly relaxing their hatred of males in 2016. I wasn't expecting that and am truly grateful.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 08:09 AM
1

Probably one of those that try to match women and sugar daddies.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 08:05 AM
2

Don't bother. The guy is a troll.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 07:56 AM
-13

Even if the hyperbolic claims in your post were true (they're not) it still wouldn't justify calling women 'stupid, rotten, disgusting, repulsive, nauseating, sickening, worthless, parasitic, hopeless, subhuman, vile CREEPS and ridiculous excuses for life'. That is exactly what men would be called by women if they were in women's position throughout the history of humanity. Heck, this is what many women, and especially feminists, call men today. It's very common to find women calling all men stu…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 06:20 AM
1

No, not 'all' women, U.S. and/or Western women. Whether NAWALT is true or not (it is irrelevant), non-Western women aren't all that different from their Western counterparts. The reason why a lot of guys from the West think they are more agreeable or nice is because Western countries are generally more prosperous and the resulting hypergamous dynamic between a Western guy and a non-Western woman ensures that the guy generally receives favourable treatment.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 08:59 AM
15

Woman who beat 4 year old son to death has murder charge dropped Of course. The disposable gender against the infallible one.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 04:57 AM
0

Amorality is toxic feminity. Women need to be taught that something not being a crime doesn't make it OK.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 10:38 AM
4

Tbh, I think the red pill stuff is relatively accurate with it's whole "be confident and engage in dominance and hierarchy sparring with other people" advice for lonely guys. Beyond that, I don't really care about their longing for times gone by and the great emphasis they put on having sex.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 06:22 AM
0

Yeah, too many from the MGTOW side also seem to be going on about wanting "men to be men" or some such nonsense. I don't really think going back to being a pack mule and guard dog for the nuclear family is all that great a deal for men.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 06:18 AM
2

Their "allies" (pets) who express feelings in a feminist-approved way are totally fine. No, they are not. There was a recent feminist cartoon that accused male feminists looking for support from women of being oppressors who burden women with "emotional labour".
/r/MensRights28/12/15 06:02 AM
3

but because she was weak weak boys are fair game though.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 05:09 AM
1

What would you say if I used Trump as an example for the way men think about women? Trump is an MRA now? but why are so quick to argue that I'm wrong when I am ON YOUR SIDE?? You can believe what you want about feminism and its stance on issues concerning boys and men, but I hope you afford others the courtesy to come to their own conclusions. We didn't just wake up one day and decide to be anti-feminist. There are very good reasons for it, and I daresay they are as valid as the ones you have to…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 02:24 AM
4

"Woman" has man in it, so that's unacceptable. They went with "womyn" for a few decades, until someone told them that men have a Y chromosome. So yeah, now they're at womxn.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 05:21 PM
2

From Prohibition to Censorship. That's a much more accurate evolution of feminism.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 05:11 AM
1

Male feminists deserve (and I suspect, even crave) every insult, slight and humiliation that female feminists throw at them.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 04:20 AM
1

"Men don't need to be taught to not rape, except these brown immigrant riff-raff".
/r/MensRights20/12/15 06:56 AM
0

Such sacrifice is wasted upon ingrates.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:56 PM
-1

No surprise. Women being women.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:28 PM
23

I'll believe it when she isn't elected to the american throne.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 03:44 PM
3

Entitlement. A major feature of toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 03:34 PM
1

They're already working on it by demanding that university education be free, i.e. taxpayers (where males contribute far more than females) pick up the tab. It's a common demand in almost all these "student activist" politics. If that happens, you can expect women to stick around in college for much longer. Masters, PhD, post-doc and whatever else in women's studies/social theory/art criticism/etc.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 01:37 AM
4

I'm not so sure. These people aren't known to have any kind of self-awareness or compassion for men.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 01:29 AM
13

First of all, citation needed. Second of all, that name-calling is pretty tame for the internet. It's like these people just bought a computer this year. They know exactly how they come across. They just don't care because they know they can use their pretend victimhood as an advantage. I've always maintained that women will be politicians' greatest allies in censoring the internet.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:14 PM
3

Well, I see neither.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:02 AM
9

But I guess its okay to have your husband, father, son, brother or boyfriend get all tortured up, beheaded and burned?? The "empathetic sex" has more empathy for the sisterhood than male relatives.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 05:44 AM
3

From her pictures, her face looked a little chubby so I said that. I've never paid much attention to what she looks like so it's certainly possible that I was mistaken.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:36 PM
4

It also helps to capture what someone initially said, and they can't cover up their bigotry at a later date by changing the article. EDIT: Case in point, that fatty from the guardian who misses being catcalled.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 02:01 PM
18

Because boys and men can separate fantasy from reality. They don't think beating up a blob of pixels is going to encourage them to beat people up IRL. Unlike some others who think that violence against those like themselves is encouraged by videogame "violence".
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:31 PM
3

Parasites. Will infect anything that they can use to enrich themselves.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:50 AM
1

None of them take men's issues seriously, but certain candidates are hostile to men to begin with. I'd say that for men, those candidates are worse than the ones who aren't misandrist.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 06:53 AM
2

Eh... They're being generous here. I'm pretty sure women want them to be provided for free just like they want free birth control, free abortion, free health checks freefreefreefreefree!
/r/MensRights10/12/15 06:54 AM
0

Yep. Longer life expectancies, better labour laws, many jobs that don't require physical exertion (which can be damaging), etc. It's far better than being a man 100 years ago.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 01:27 PM
0

Hunter gatherer times were when a man had a huge chance of dying young, either violently or through common diseases. Basically, Hobbes was right. That idyllic "peaceful hunter-gatherers" picture that anthropologists like to paint is a myth.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 01:24 PM
2

I do the same thing. Keep work related stuff very strictly professional and exchange no jokes or whatever with them. When it comes to mentoring women, I delegate it to a more junior guy. It may or may not be a troll, but there's nothing unusual about OP's behaviour.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:15 AM
2

Copy battle royale*
/r/MensRights09/12/15 06:36 AM
1

Except that's how she thinks men are, as a gender a threat to women and children. Women and children all over the world want men to die so that they can live. It's like saying "Women all over the world are whores but they can be redeemed if we help them stop their whorishness. We believe women are better than that."
/r/MensRights09/12/15 12:38 AM
1

If men could get pregnant there'd be no use for women. *applause*
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:36 AM
5

Reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:30 AM
8

I suspect that you're looking for something like Bell Hooks' "Feminism is for Everybody." Just be careful to read between the lines ;) If he worries too much about reading between the lines, he might just miss what's staring him in the face. Women and children all over the world want men to die so that they can live. This is the most painful truth of male domination, that men wield patriarchal power in daily life in ways that are awesomely life-threatening, that women and children cower in fear …
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:27 AM
1

Radical feminism is the most "common sense" feminism since they take feminist theories to their logical conclusion.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:22 AM
8

> Can't respect this at all you're confusing feminism, a thing which some women have DIED for wat?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:19 AM
3

Oh, it's that dilettante who can't spell dilettante.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 11:39 AM
1

Courtesy, consideration and affection are wasted on those who have no appreciation for them.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:03 PM
1

They don't see it as homosexuality.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:58 PM
2

I really do have faith in the idea that women can learn to respect men's rights. The Honey Badgers are proof positive. The honey badgers are like, 6-7 women. They are a very small exception. I certainly don't think whatever feminists call the patriarchy is a great system for men. Too many unnecessary obligations and burdens. And about your developing beliefs, I don't want to say they are wrong. Everyone learns from their experiences. No need to be apologetic about what your experiences teach you…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:51 PM
2

See the state of American colleges where this sort of brainwashing is rampant. If young adults can be turned into feminist zombies, children stand no chance.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:19 PM
2

Australia seems to be aiming to out-sweden Sweden.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:14 PM
3

Sylvia Pankhurst on men who died on the Titanic “Women first” Is the Universal Rule, says Sylvia Pankhurst, and This Is No Exception. She wasn't any better than the other women in her family.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 08:08 AM
2

Pretty sure they ran tests on Richard the 3rd's DNA after his body was exhumed a couple of years ago. They found that he was from a bastard line.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 11:52 PM
-2

I lol'd. That was great.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 01:46 PM
2

"It's a boy/girl" is a common sentence that shows the use of 'it' to refer to a child. It's not gramatically incorrect.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 01:37 PM
16

Toxic feminity. All women must be required to attend classes that will teach them that killing children and men is wrong.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 01:23 PM
3

No they'll keep the diversity hires. This will only apply to non-quota jobs.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 01:15 PM
0

What else is on offer? Not monetary help since you are expected to be independent and "have your shit together". Not emotional support because " I'm not your mom". What else? That men are even discussing replacing relationships with women with inanimate dolls should tell you how men's relationships with women are.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 02:02 AM
2

Feminism is for everyone in the same way that white supremacy is for everyone. White supremacists would be pretty happy to have non-white "allies" working towards their goals. It's likewise with feminists and males.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 01:38 AM
2

Rejecting the label means nothing if you keep supporting the same policies. I am not as pessimistic as MGTOWs, but the pace at which men's issues are being recognized is quite slow. I think in 4 years, we've moved from "men are the ruling class, they have no problems in society" to "I acknowledge boys and men have some problems, but let's not forget who the real victims are here".
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:49 AM
2

It will only happen when men don't need to work as hard to support a family and their tax contributions go down.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:57 PM
6

Introducing feminism to India would be just as catastrophic as it has been for the West. Indeed. Also, it's already been introduced. Feminists already successfully lobbied to exclude boys and men from ever being considered victims of rape. Their reasoning was that males would level false accusations against women if that happened.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:53 PM
8

AWALT = All Women Are Like That
/r/MensRights25/11/15 03:59 PM
22

Men were happy with gender segregated spaces for millennia. Pretty sure they wouldn't have any complaints with any new male-only spaces.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 03:01 PM
1

Well, for men there isn't much on offer, but plenty of demands to fulfill. I can see how you'd reach that conclusion.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 12:25 PM
40

I'm Indian and while there is the problem of women being very prone to dispensing mob violence upon any boys or men who accidentally step onto a women's coach, I am happy that they have their own separate coaches. I don't need them ruining my morning commute with their hysteria. The only problem I have is that men don't have our own coaches. Women are allowed in them.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 12:06 PM
4

2x often complains that there are too many MRAs posting there. Maybe their complaints are not without merit and that would explain the "support for the MRM" that 2x sometimes shows.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:54 AM
25

They deserve everything they get. Lining up to join a misandrist movement and they thought they'd be spared the same treatment as other men?
/r/MensRights25/11/15 07:05 AM
6

That's true, but I think men can be more easily convinced because many can relate to men's experiences.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 06:59 AM
18

No, they are not "on our side". A few are, certainly. But you'll find more women willing to engage red pillers than MRAs. /r/PurplePillDebate which is a red pill debate sub has more women who post regularly than this sub. I think it's because a red pill guy at least fits their caricature of how a man is, while most people have no idea how to react to a man airing any grievances. You will never get anywhere as many female MRAs as there are male feminists.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 06:39 AM
5

Not just feminists, women in general will defend that.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 03:25 AM
1

It just seems like opportunism.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 06:36 AM
1

This PM is a feminist. It's feminists doing this. Don't believe the true feminist scotswomen telling you otherwise.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 06:32 AM
3

Most of the support for men's rights also comes from men.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 02:42 AM
1

The group that made suicide bombing really popular, the Tamil tigers in Sri Lanka, had female suicide bombers.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 02:40 AM
10

The hubris is cringeworthy. She is not even average. She is mediocre.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 02:37 AM
2

Adolescent boys need to know that having sexual interests in women does not make them sexist or misogynistic; right now, they generally think it does. That does not really concern me much. Adolescent boys learn in time what works and what doesn't. Almost all who genuinely feel guilt for sexual attraction outgrow it. The only men who hold on to the feminist narrative post the young adult stage seem to me to be manipulators and sociopaths like gomeshi and schwyzer. What does depress me are the eff…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 04:07 AM
6

I'm still left in the sense that I support social programs for groups that I think need help and I've lived among different cultures so I am not nationalistic at all (something that the majority of those on the right are). But I have never been supportive of feminism. Even as a teen the hatred for men was obvious and transparent to me. There are influential feminists actively shutting down discussions on matters that don't even concern them. How would it affect feminists in any way if men got to…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 04:11 PM
2

From the comments: I have two requirements of men in my newly oversensitized world of metrosexuals Yes, that's very good dear. Now go away.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 03:41 PM
1

There's something about her look that really puts me off. Like she looks like an adult but still has a face that looks like a child's. It's unsettling.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 03:33 PM
12

A woman I was discussing masculinity with online said that too. I didn't want to discuss further. You can't hope to achieve anything discussing male issues with someone like that. I don't think it's an uncommon belief among women.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 12:11 PM
2

Eric Raymond is none of those things, but his warning should be heeded by males attending tech events. Better safe than sorry. There are a lot of people out there who are bothered by the success of free software. They aren't above using these kinds of tactics. It worked on Assange, it can work on others.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 06:08 AM
4

"Downplaying of men's issues is an acceptable trade for not having to hear unpleasant women be sometimes called bitches"
/r/MensRights18/11/15 12:11 AM
1

You think a desperate refugee would care about signing something so meaningless? Unless it makes their life worse than what it was where they came from, they'll sign anything. I don't really see the point of this.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 02:20 PM
3

Boys and men are not entitled to women's concern, shitlord! /s
/r/MensRights14/11/15 04:08 PM
3

I've often said that it's easier to send someone off to die when you can't put yourself in their shoes. It's a matter of one's ability to empathize.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 02:17 PM
3

miners So... overwhelmingly men, I suppose?
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:43 PM
2

Nope. I remember a post on 4chan where a girl tried pegging her boyfriend and her response was immediate disgust once they got into the act.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:39 PM
3

Any such matriarchy is not going to have women dominating the positions of power. It is going to have a small class of men who support women's interests dominating all positions of power. Women will not put themselves in visible positions of power where they can be held responsible for anything that goes wrong. The men they put there will shoulder that responsibility. Women do not wield power in the same way that men do. there would not be the same 'benevolent sexism' that women have been afford…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:25 PM
0

The lack of empathy by modern women The lack of empathy is not a modern phenomenon.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 01:10 PM
3

So, after smearing her as a con artist who lied about her awards and shitting on her previous work, he tried to concern troll her into taking him seriously?
/r/MensRights13/11/15 03:18 PM
3

If we're just trading quotes, here's a well-known feminist on male suicide: The last time I suggested that suicides should be left to get on with it, I received a small number of letters from people whose sons had killed themselves. All of them demanded an apology. I'd advise them this time to save their stamps because, you see, I don't care. Fuck them, we don't want or need their support. So no, the response not only doesn't have any credibility, it is a disgusting attempt to cover up anti-male…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 02:51 PM
2

Not caring about a black person claiming to starve themselves. Evidence of white privilege. /s Also, pretty sure he isn't starving. He claimed he was still taking vitamin and sugar supplements, so he's just going to be giving up on tasty stuff for a little while.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 12:34 PM
1

I'm saying this because I agree that there are boys/men issues. That people like you even admit this now is progress by the MRM. I think MRAs should continue doing what works and not pay any heed to the guilt trippers and those looking to pin accusations of racism and hatred on them.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 12:19 PM
1

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 11:39 AM
6

Just the sisterhood lauding their own.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:41 AM
2

Actually, I don't see why they (or other big corps) wouldn't fund something like the Ada Initiative. Open Source software is still their big competitor and organizations like the Ada Initiative don't really require much money to run and are a constant source of disharmony. They may not be running the whole thing, but it is in their interest that these groups flourish.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 06:49 AM
3

Bizarre, because git is more or less a synonym for retard. The name of their website is equivalent to RetardHub.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 05:30 AM
1

I mirror my projects on github, but it's only really for putting on the resume because HRetards think having your repos there gives you more developer cred. I otherwise use my own git server.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 05:26 AM
1

Funny how PHP doesn't have as big a problem with SJWs as Ruby and Python, which are infested with socjus. Poor old PHP is just not glamourous enough.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 05:23 AM
2

I remember reading an article somewhere where an SJW was whining that fewer girls being diagnosed with autism was some sort of discrimination against women.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:13 PM
8

This doesn't surprise me. They have a history of crying harassment and "rape and death threats" the moment they see an opportunity. I really, really hope that tech projects and conferences slam their gates on these demagogues. Let them start their own "opensource+" projects.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 05:23 AM
3

No need to respond. Just don't associate with people who think of boys and men in this way.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 04:37 AM
2

A drama sub would be more appropriate for this kind of stuff. Though not sure what's notable about this. It's expected behaviour from a feminist.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 04:32 AM
3

No, they will make it mandatory to fund women's sports with an equal amount of money, regardless of how big their audience is. It's always about money.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 09:37 AM
2

Under patriarchy, every woman's son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman. According to many women, feminist or not, we do live under a patriarchy and the sagely feminist quote above helpfully clarifies the implications for people existing under such a system. Poisoned M&Ms and all that.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:55 AM
5

No, I'm saying that it's okay to protect yourself and not worry about how it would hurt someone's feeeeelings. Likely someone who thinks you are a rapist anyway.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:46 AM
2

It makes sense from a "know your enemy" type of reasoning.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:45 AM
3

Nope. The history between black and white people in the US or former African colonies is not comparable to that between men and women.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:43 AM
2

Males = white and women = black isn't a valid analogy.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:34 AM
8

Such a petulant article. How toxically feminine.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:30 AM
2

Who cares? Better safe than sorry.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:22 AM
3

I often repeat here that niceness is wasted on those who have no appreciation for it. And more so on those who actively show contempt for it.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:18 AM
1

Only medication reduced the suicidal thoughts. And the lack of a quick, foolproof method. If I had access to firearms before the medication, I have no doubt at all that I'd have done it, and it would have been the right decision at the time.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 07:12 AM
3

Look who's supporting them. And she confirmed that the Lib Dems just swept her bigotry under the rug. It was fitting to see her party wiped out recently. I hope they never recover.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:49 AM
1

"It's sad that the boy died, but let's remember who the real victims are here. Also, other men (and only men, not women at all, no) say its ok so like, idk lol".
/r/MensRights27/10/15 07:17 AM
0

Then he could've just kept his mouth shut. He went out of his way to bring up some internet related video games issue just to show how much he cares about the wimxnz. Shows where his priorities lie.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 12:34 AM
4

Agreed unequivocally.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 02:35 PM
23

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 02:34 AM
1

Good. Pleasantries and greetings are wasted upon women.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 01:12 PM
10

Worse. 17.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 01:09 PM
1

I mostly use linux, so midori on that and palemoon (a Firefox fork) on windows.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 11:15 PM
4

Google just teamed up with feminist harassers in an idiotic effort to "make the web safer" or something.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 03:16 AM
0

I'm one of those brogrammer ideologues who'd prefer to not use a proprietary product if I can.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 03:14 AM
1

Entitlement = Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 08:21 AM
1

Indeed. All the talk about lack of female internet entrepreneurs, no girls on the internet, etc. and when we finally have them, hey, they drag in their stereotypical gossipy do-you-know-what-he-said-omg-you-won't-believe-it behaviour online. I wish I could say that I am surprised.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 09:32 AM
5

That sub is full of women, not just feminists. NAWALT (the N stands for nearly).
/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:02 PM
8

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 10:47 AM
1

This doesn't seem legit. The links are all on social media, which can be created by anyone and universities have been incredibly stubborn in hanging on to their anti male policies. This university being among the worst of them. Need better confirmation than this. Until then I'll consider this a troll.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:38 AM
1

Not all in the MRM. I think it's perfectly fine to sign women up even for combat roles. I'm not American though, so my opinion isn't really relevant to the selective service matter. There will always be some resistance to the idea, but I think if enforced correctly and fairly across all genders, it will soon become normalized.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 02:19 AM
3

So you're supporting the view that giving men shared custody is tantamount to enabling child abuse? I don't think we need whatever kind of "support" you're offering.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 01:38 AM
1

I agree with almost all of your causes Lol. I remember a few years ago when every one of your sort would make light of these issues, make jokes about them and mock men sharing their problems. It's because of the kind of relentless and unreserved support shown for men's issues by those like avfm (as imperfect as they may be) that people like you are at least ashamed enough to show some agreement with these issues. But you know what? We got so far without you, I think we can keep going. Go swim wi…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 01:24 AM
1

Well, they seemed pretty bullish about it. Also shows that twitter is rotten from the top.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 04:59 PM
1

So they couldn't get any grassroots support for it and will now try to force it through business, universities and governments.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 12:56 PM
4

Lol. Heforshe was hoping to sign up 1 billion white knights on their website. They only got to 300k or so. Gives me a bit of hope.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 12:22 PM
3

in situations where we do not, we have laws to ensure that the man must support the child financially. Which need to be repealed in the case that a man doesn't consent to be a parent to a newborn. But that is a men's issue and entirely separate from abortion. Whether the women have abortions or not is their issue. Men not being forced into parenthood regardless of whatever the woman decides is a men's issue. I would never suggest that men have a right to decide a matter so entwined with a woman'…
/r/MensRights23/09/15 09:21 AM
1

I think men should be indifferent to this political issue. It shouldn't matter whether a candidate is for or against abortion when a man is considering his vote. Men should learn to focus on their own issues and not let others' issues have an effect on that focus.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 07:20 AM
-2

I wouldn't call him a dumbfuck, but he definitely shouldn't have. I hope this serves as yet another warning against marrying women.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:03 AM
2

They aren't actually supposed to mean anything. They're just a quaint and ceremonial part of a woman's biggest day. I don't doubt that this woman is eagerly looking forward to another one of those days where she can repeat those words.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 01:54 AM
41

Toxic Femininity Exactly.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 01:19 PM
3

Porn and prostitution are two of the few things feminists are actually split on. But they are united against "teh menz" patronizing prostitutes or porn. Prudish Feminist: Women should not be allowed to be prostitutes or pornstars. Sorta less prudish feminist: Women should be allowed to do whatever they want. But solicitation of prostitutes by men must be criminalized. And perhaps, consumption of porn too, maybe later, when the political climate is more amenable.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 09:30 AM
2

It's rare. The sisterhood is a thing, unlike the patriarchy. It's what they project onto men. They look out for their own.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:45 AM
21

Why is being a woman a merit for anyone who isn't a bigot?
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:42 AM
5

Solipsism is an aspect of toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:37 AM
1

I've said this before. Niceness is wasted on women.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 12:04 PM
1

What is precedent?
/r/MensRights09/09/15 02:26 PM
5

Reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 05:50 AM
1

We just had a series of threads the other day about men's groups disrupting a private business that discriminated against men. This is exactly the same! Yeah it was. And do you think I don't want to keep it as simple as "no discrimination anywhere" and just let women have haircuts wherever they want? That'd be pretty nice and uncomplicated and I'd be on board with it completely if I hadn't seen how similar situations turn out in the past. The problem is that inevitably the victim narrative will …
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:50 AM
1

Like it hasn't happened in a thousand other fields already.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:35 AM
6

we need to get moderate feminists to feel empowered to come to the defense of men's rights advocates. This is not going to happen. Men started with trying to reason with feminists about their issues. That it didn't work is why we have incompatibility now. You are talking of doing the same thing that was done before and expecting a different outcome.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:10 AM
0

People here are so naive. This is just the beginning. Soon the victimry will follow. Men in barbershops make women uncomfortable. Barber shop environments are misogynistic. Barbers can look down my shirt while I'm getting a haircut. Barber shop rape culture. No. Keep them out.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 02:26 AM
2

Yeah I expect that sort of mentality now.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 01:12 PM
2

Even if women had begged to do hard labor jobs in 1917 men wouldn't have let them. Just like men never let them vote after they asked for enfranchisement. Very convinient argument there for women, and sadly something I've come to expect.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 04:49 AM
3

Aren't women the most voracious consumers? Good luck with "taking on climate change through the way women live". Or does the way women live translate to the way women will again lay the blame for their vast demand and consumption of products upon men.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:03 AM
2

trollop means prostitute. How do you "read" leftwing prostitute?
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:51 AM
1

Or just fetishize being held in captivity by female guards and masturbate to that. The weeeemynz will be so "omg ewwwww so disgusting like I can't even so gross" that they'll close the camp themselves.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:48 AM
23

Toxic Feminity.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:42 AM
7

what this has to do with men's rights Women's violence against boys is a men's issue.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:41 AM
1

It's only male childen.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:15 AM
2

I've always wondered how radfems are going to implement these "put all men in a camp" or "exterminate 90% of men" strategies. They are not going to "exterminate" 90% of men, but you bet when the time is right, like when most jobs done by men are automated, they will bring up how men are a burden on society because many are unemployed. There will be a general devaluing of men since our value only seems to come from what we do. There isn't going to be any extermination, they aren't stupid enough t…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 06:58 AM
9

They take care of their own. The sisterhood is real, and that's what they project onto men as the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 11:00 AM
21

Freedom is slavery
/r/MensRights03/09/15 04:43 PM
1

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:40 PM
1

Since only like 300K males signed up through the web, well short of their 1 billion target, they're probably trying to worm it in through the old feminist cesspools that are universities.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:09 PM
0

discourages exactly the (masculine) qualities and dispositions that have allowed men to become CEOs, billionaires, tech-startup stars and so on. Tech guys aren't really what many would call masculine.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 06:50 AM
1

I think men must start voting as a bloc, like women do. Male friendly issues should take precedence among men and the issues of non-male groups should be left to those groups to support. I think too many men afford consideration to non-male issues like abortion. That issue should be irrelevant to men and should not affect their voting decisions. Whether a candidate is pro or anti abortion should not affect men's vote. Likewise, any other male issues should not be sacrified for so-called larger c…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 05:24 AM
12

Jailed for four months for stealing a petty snack, and probation for women raping boys. This mentality of male disposability and wonderfulness of women is a social disease.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 04:20 AM
3

All female feminists have toxic feminity, but not all those who have toxic feminity are feminists.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 03:57 AM
1

Feminist infighting. Nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 05:11 PM
2

There are still plenty of jobs for males to do to keep things running. We're not anywhere near full automation yet. But once we get there, you bet the usual suspects will start up their shenanigans about toxic men in mum's basements parasitizing off of society while contributing nothing.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:14 PM
3

Why don't we just kill non attractive babies that don't come from rich families. Only the males of course. Because they can grow up to be worker drones for society. Provide labour and taxes.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:22 PM
1

A poster named Serebellum writes: Tells you everything about women, doesn't it? It's also the reason why I work more than one job or project at any given time. I was unemployed for 2 months once 10 years ago. The contempt with which people see you...
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:14 PM
59

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:20 AM
5

It's the drama. Constant emotional highs and lows. Fear and excitement. Living in a soap opera vs the mundane real world.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:57 AM
11

True face of not just feminism, but toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:20 AM
4

capitalist India between 1950-1970 looooooooooooooooooooooool
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:05 AM
2

MRA, yes because I am a man, empathize with men and would like to better their condition. Redpiller, no because redpill is just not how I want to be. Antifeminist yes, because feminists are anti-male. PUA, same as redpill. I have no interest in their methods. MGTOW, not really, a lot of them seem to be libertarians and I'm not one. I don't know what a "cultural libertarian" is. I just find libertarians too enamoured with rich people and worshipful of them. Very offputting.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 06:22 AM
11

Hatred and ingratitude towards males and entitlement to ever increasing concessions from them is the essence of toxic feminity. If it were the other way around, and women pretty much single-handedly built modern civilization, instead of protecting and providing for boys and men, they'd brand all of them as lazy parasites upon womankind and would see a lot more value than they already do in the feminist desire for androcide.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:21 AM
10

Civilization.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:15 AM
1

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:12 AM
0

Thoroughly deserved treatment for male feminists. Also shows you what kind of people you'll find in the concern trolling "menslib" sub.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 10:28 AM
3

That feminist solanas was right about something after all. White knights really are "turd men". Maybe even an understatement.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 10:06 AM
5

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 04:46 AM
5

Humor is always acceptable and should be welcomed, not condemned. I suppose all that killallmen, SCUM manifesto, an entire panel and audience of women laughing on TV about a man being sexually mutilated is OK because clearly it's all just humour.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 03:29 AM
1

It's not just a post on a board. It's a post on a board that'll ban you and delete your post on the slightest perception of imaginary MsO'Genie. That the post and the one who posted it was allowed to stay says a lot. About well known feminists' views on male suicide, there were a bunch of threads about Julie Burchill a few weeks ago. Equally disgusting.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 01:33 AM
8

Feminist on male suicides Suicide is the biggest killer of young men. Arguably good riddance to the privileged
/r/MensRights20/08/15 08:07 AM
3

Yep. That's why I take his articles with a grain of salt. He makes his disdain for men's rights pretty clear. His girlfriend also ran a concern trolling blog for male issues before this one and popularized the schrodinger's rapist idea. Some of his ideas have merit but they aren't exactly novel to anyone sympathetic to men and their issues and I've always got the feeling that his concern for boys and men is less than genuine. It's good that he has some nice things to say and I appreciate that ve…
/r/MensRights20/08/15 01:12 AM
10

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 02:21 PM
5

From what I remember from my teens is that men would buy these "men's magazines" primarily for the pictures of women in them. The Internet has pretty much destroyed that as a business model. I don't know who still buys these magazines and how they're still around. Maybe a lot of old guys just forgot to cancel their subscriptions.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 05:04 AM
1

They don't need to entangle themselves into legal bonds if they can get what they want without it. Financial support even after the relationship ends (common law marriage, alimony, etc) and removal of stigma from sleeping around is good enough. No legalization is necessary.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 01:05 PM
2

Niceness is not only entirely optional, but may be severely detrimental to success with women. Males should always remember that.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:49 PM
3

That's because they don't generally think of men as people. Just as tools.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:39 PM
4

They'll make their peace with some form of soft/informal polygamy.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:11 PM
2

That party enables crap like this. It was going to affect them sooner or later.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 10:08 AM
1

Yeah, I always got the impression that the women against feminism thing was inspired in large part by the traditionalist "men as providers" expectation. Still, at least some concern, genuine or not is more comforting than outright hatred.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 04:58 PM
11

All these "green parties" all over the world are anti-male. Without exception.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 02:04 AM
1

Response to NAFALT? AFALT.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 08:28 AM
1

And what is their stance on criminalization of solicitation of sex workers?
/r/MensRights12/08/15 06:22 AM
4

380,000 men support her #HeForShe shame meme! Leverage the Twitter platform to drive towards HeForShe’s 1B target. LOL! What a flop. 380K white knights is still a shame though.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 05:44 AM
1

All feminism is bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 03:12 PM
1

One of the things that's talked about pretty often is that feminism is a disingenuous movement. I figure that seeing this being addressed from the black female perspective not only reinforces this fact, but is also incredibly interesting. Our reasons for considering it disingenuous are different from those of their splinter group. So yeah, this doesn't have anything to do with men's rights and doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 03:11 PM
2

Yep, just because misandrists aren't banned here doesn't mean they are welcome. They should have enough decency to stay away.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:44 PM
1

They are still feminists and anti-male. No goodwill for boys and men is to be expected of them.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 11:02 AM
3

Why don't MRAs bring attention to male deaths by asteroid? It isn't women's job to do so.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 10:58 AM
1

They'll grudgingly accept polygamy.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 12:44 PM
2

By gendering I mean dropping the "too" part in men can be raped too, or that men deserve reproductive rights too. To the MRM, the primary concern about any issue should be whether it affects boys or men at all. And if it is something bad for men, there has to be a solution for male victims. Basically, a stronger focus on male victims and less attempts to justify if something is a bigger issue for males or those who aren't male. Even if male victims are a minority in any issue, the MRM's priority…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:48 AM
1

homelessness problem for women We should learn from this. The MRM must gender all its issues.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 12:41 AM
6

Just ignore that sub. There's nothing there we haven't seen before and their inherent bias against men (we r feminitz) will ensure that it fails just like all the other concern trolling efforts towards male issues by feminists (goodmanproject, a bunch of subs here like srsmen, masculism, feminismformen, etc. or studies about "masculinity" in women's studies courses which most men generally ignore). They have nothing to attract males with and you are only slowing their demise by giving them atten…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 02:56 AM
4

brigading Posted unironically by someone against men's rights in a sub about men's rights. Why don't you just go away? You don't belong here.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:48 AM
1

I don't think seeking acknowledgement from people like those is a worthwhile endeavour. If someone feels that they must publicly oppose sexism, they should feel free to do it, but it is not something that should be expected of males.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:59 PM
6

I'm wondering is the "male stranger" something women are genetically predisposed to fear. The lack of empathy may not be borne of fear. Often times it is simply indifference, or even contempt.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 12:48 PM
3

It's sex/relationship advice for men. Has nothing to do with men's rights. I wouldn't say the advice is bad though. Just maybe not for everyone. Lonely men haven't much to lose by considering it.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 11:40 AM
3

These are all just discussions about feminist minutiae. They're meaningless outside of that echo chamber. It's like discussing "Jewish mendacity" outside of anti-Semitic ideologies.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 11:25 AM
1

Who decided this? There should be no such expectation or obligation of men.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 11:17 AM
6

Wasn't even aware it existed. Just leave them to it and it'll sink like all the others, we don't need to pay any heed. Feminism doesn't have anything positive for boys and men.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:06 AM
3

Yep. I don't see any downside to being avoided by idiots.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 12:28 PM
1

No surprise there. Circlebroke is just SRS without the dildo gifs.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 12:20 PM
5

Women like to laugh at things Yeah. That we can clearly see from that image.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:47 AM
13

There were suffragettes on the Titanic and they happily took advantage of the women (and perhaps a few children) first policy and made it off alive.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 06:14 AM
16

I have made Men's rights my number one priority with voting. Abortion rights, immigration, civil rights, etc. can all take a back seat to men in America getting shared custody at the very least. This is a good thing and it is how women vote. Economics, war and bad foreign policy take a back seat to women's issues. We should learn. Men should consider their own issues to be of paramount importance.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 06:10 AM
10

I might. That would be a shame, but you realize that not everyone on this sub feels the same way as you do. There will always be disagreements. And if your disagreement sounds very similar to an SJW dismissal tactic (which do exist), people will say it.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 04:56 AM
11

And will you stop doing all that because some people on a message board disagreed with you? driving away people that care about your concerns. If not, carry on, if you really do what you claim, it's great. But we can only judge from your comments here. While there have been plenty of ridiculous replies to your comments here, I've also felt that you have a habit of trying to minimize and dismiss many male issues. Either way, it doesn't really matter if you are doing something good. You don't need…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 04:47 AM
10

driving away people that care about your concerns. Yes, you are definitely very concerned.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 04:40 AM
7

No it doesn't. Attention from ugly men still provides as an ego boost, which is desirable. Being ignored by even those who are ugly is like rubbing salt into the wound.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 04:13 AM
54

Ignore. Nothing bothers them more than being made to feel invisible or unworthy of attention.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:09 PM
0

if you know her name or figure out his name you can find it. i found it through searches. I don't really care, tbh. I just remember her earlier actions and going by them it is reasonable to assume that she is just disingenuous and a controversy hound.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 10:32 AM
1

Being on reddit all day apparently gets him laid. So he's probably just trawling for any mention of OneY mods.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 04:27 AM
1

It's a women's circlejerk sub, just ignore it. Also, I haven't ever heard of a sub becoming better after being made default. I have heard a lot of the opposite. So, I don't think a male issues sub needs to go default.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 04:24 AM
15

Yeah. Was in a thread a couple months ago or so I think. Also, a related argument from feminists is that fewer women commit suicide compared to men because they are concerned about not leaving a gory mess behind and having a beautiful corpse. They'll pretty much make any shit up than acknowledge male issues.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 03:28 AM
1

Yep. IIRC she also pretended to commit suicide once. I won't believe a word of what she has to say regarding boys and men. Don't know why people here have forgotten about her actions from a couple years ago.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:59 AM
0

Isn't she a known liar? And pretended to commit suicide? She's a dramanaut and none of this shit makes up for what she spewed before. Ignore if possible, and archive if you can't.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:54 AM
13

Women are judged more by their looks when discussing their ....looks. Men are laughed at after being stabbed. This, and that feminist claim about how it's sadder that some maid has to clean up a male suicide victim's gore than a man actually committing suicide, shows you that any good faith shown toward a feminist in a discussion of gender issues is a waste of time. They just need to be told to fuck off and stay away.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:30 AM
2

oxymoronic "men's rights" misogyny inherent in Reddit's core demographic (disaffected white makes). I say this as a white male Pathetic and cringeworthy self-flagellation.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 02:49 AM
6

Yep. I thought it was a great answer. Blew smoke up their collective asses and killed their inane objections.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 05:25 AM
2

Because unlike him, some people care about boys and men and their issues.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:33 PM
7

Go away and take your disingenuous concern for male victims with you.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:57 AM
4

Pretty sure they'll bring that in if there is any money involved. Any funding to make conditions better for men will be grabbed to "make women's prisons safer" or something.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:57 AM
30

If alimony ends up being framed as a problem for women, the solution to it will also be woman-specific. I don't think we can expect something positive for men to come out of it. They'll likely bring in a double standard that solves the problem for women but not for men.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 07:04 AM
11

Hoping for a pity fuck from a feminist acquaintance.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:11 AM
2

Yet another goony beard man.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:06 AM
3

Such petty entitlement.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 01:30 AM
6

But I think a better answer would have been "There are! Half of the minions are female. Minion genders are hard for humans to tell apart, though..." Nope. That would only open the gates further for "deconstruction of the portrayal of female minions from a rape culture perspective" or some such shit. His answer was great.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 04:50 AM
1

I have no problem with the reason the creator gave. If it shuts up the whiners, it's good.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 04:48 AM
5

"toxic leadership" victim-blaming "reinforced gender bias and stereotypes" Says all you need to know about those who got her fired. Also, Germano believed these efforts were being undermined by her immediate superior, Recruit Training Regiment commander Col. Daniel Haas. "Through his words, actions, and omissions, he has empowered malcontents within my unit to foment dissent as demonstrated by the very pointed and similar comments about me in the recent [Defense Equal Opportunity Management Inst…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 02:58 AM
5

I mean to say that even if it were the opposite, that women received higher satisfaction from sex with circumcised men, it still wouldn't justify circumcision in any way. It must not be performed upon non-adults, and in adults, it is only justified by the person electing to undergo the surgery. Women's sexual satisfaction is not relevant here.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:21 AM
2

I see way too many assholes show up to places online discussing female issues in a clearly female-focused event and saying "NO FAIR WHAT ABOUT MEN". And people are bringing up "But le weeeeemen" in this thread here, when it's a thread about boys and child labour. Singling out some MRAs who do it is missing the point. Men used to do it because they were affected by an issue and feminists would try to gender it while telling them that feminism is the movement for their issues too. But now that the…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:11 AM
2

Why is boys being forced into labour not a men's issue?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:59 AM
3

That whole thread is vile. People asking him to "help her" and not get the fuck away with his children.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:23 AM
8

Women's pleasure is irrelevant to the matter.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:37 AM
2

When that accusation leads to them losing social power. No consequences, no reason for women to change.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:38 AM
1

Probably a fan of that talk show. They seem to be out of touch with reality.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:34 AM
6

I would love to ask that woman to name one situation where women have more responsibilities than men Asking doesn't work. Expecting good faith, genuine engagement, understanding or empathy doesn't work. She will simply shriek misogyny and eagerly pull out her victim mantle. The only thing that may work on these people are their own weapons. Guilt, ostracism, condescension, playing up beliefs as personal failures, subtly making any disagreement as personal as possible, etc. Do not ask her anythin…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:57 PM
3

It all makes perfect sense if you understand that feminism is simply hatred of boys and men. Anything good for men is bad and anything bad for men is good. Men protecting women with their lives is good, so conscription is good. Men graduating in disciplines that will land them more lucrative jobs than women is bad.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:08 PM
6

Not robosex so much as immersive VR. Robots will be expensive, clunky and far more complex than sensations just fed to the brain.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 12:05 PM
41

NKF considers female conscription as a misunderstanding of the concept of gender equality and the intentions of the Law on Equality. Gender equality implies first and foremost that women and men should have the same human rights and fundamental freedoms. Women should be valued and allocated power and resources on equal terms with men. But women and men do not have to be alike or do the same things to be equal. This is what real feminists, who represent women on a political level think.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:03 AM
5

she Because they know they'll find an equal number of male "victims" if they didn't gender that question or their survey sample. Also, I've had sex with my gf many times when I didn't want to and she did. I guess I'd be a "rape victim" if our genders were swapped. And I'm from Asia, so I've probably oppressed countless women already.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:03 AM
7

American Hikikomori. Sure, I have a job to pay the bills, but anytime I'm not at work, I'm in my apartment keeping the world out. Most men who are shut-ins or prefer to immerse themselves into introvert hobbies like video games etc. have jobs and support themselves just fine. I don't know why it bothers people so much, it's not like they're burdening others.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:47 AM
19

Like they escaped to "gender studies" from "women's studies". In this case it would be just as bad because they will try to associate "human" with "female" within the context of humanism.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 02:22 PM
0

With "atypical" I mean that you could have a girl that learns better in a male environment and vice versa. Policies are usually formulated according to general trends. A few individuals may go against the trend, but I think there are other solutions to that problem than disadvantaging a whole group.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:31 AM
1

I looked for a male psych for my depression. I just wouldn't have been comfortable talking to a female one. I generally prefer consulting with male doctors as well.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:27 AM
3

How do we know it is the gender mix and not the teaching style being applied in those classrooms? Did they change the teaching style or material when teaching an all-male class? And how do we deal with the "atypical" boys and girls? Atypical in what sense?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:11 AM
4

Why not learn both at the same time? Because as said upthread, boys tend to do well in an all-male environment? If the aim is to educate boys well and that works better in an all-male environment why not segregate the class and have your coexistence skills class separately? That works too.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:03 AM
2

35 years ago, women's college hoops coaches were people who coached the team as a side gig, or as an additional responsibility to their full time jobs. That is how most sports started. As teams of amateur male players who played on holidays because they enjoyed it and had full-time jobs during the week. People came to watch them and eventually the players could turn professional. Maybe to get women's football off the ground, women need to play because they like it and not because they want to be…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 09:53 AM
1

I'm not saying that it will always result in the act of violence; but the underlying impulse is there. From personal experience, it's not. For me or for many other men I know. I used to be tongue-tied in a situation like that, until I learned to speak their language.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 10:40 AM
1

And men are designed by nature to react violently to this sort of insult. You sound like a feminut.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 10:00 AM
20

They better start getting better at suicide then, I guess.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 02:14 AM
1

Her audience is mainly women. Maybe women find things attractive in other women that men don't.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 05:26 AM
1

These are the kind of things women do when they're in power. Shows you why they think a patriarchy is constantly "oppressing" them. They see men in power and expect them to have similar views towards women as they do towards men.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 05:22 AM
12

Classy how men turns to "scumbags" in her quote. I don't really give a shit if she wants to hate us, but she certainly shouldn't be shielded from criticism of her views.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 02:21 AM
2

Archived on archive.is multiple times today: https://archive.is/jYkjz
/r/MensRights02/07/15 02:10 PM
0

I'm trying so hard to be open minded going through this board, but y'all are making it so hard. There is no need to be, and you are not required to be open-minded. If you don't like what we have to say, you can reject it. Though it'd be better for you and for us if you simply went to a sub that suits your sensibilities better instead.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 02:04 PM
8

Not to mention, her son would have been pretty familiar with her views on suicidal men since she shared them with all the world. Knowing that that's what your parent thinks about how you feel is not a good thing for someone who is suicidal.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:49 PM
11

Maybe, but I'm not in favour of seeing men's lives sacrificed for that. And I don't think someone who so callously dismisses the suicides of boys and men is going to ever have any compassion for males, even if the one committing suicide is their child.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:33 PM
12

No, men don't deserve suicide regardless of whether their parents are feminists or not.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:26 PM
6

It may have or it may not have. Why jump to conclusions? Because I've been suicidal and if someone close to me said the kind of stuff she does about male suicide, it'd hurt me very much. I'm willing to bet she doesn't believe it any more... Why jump to that conclusion then?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:20 PM
5

From her quotes in the Telegraph article, to me it looks like she's moved on already.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 09:01 AM
16

Any reason why you think this is schadenfreude? People are bringing to attention that the attitudes of people like his mother worsen the situation of suicidal men. You don't think the beliefs and behaviour of someone who says stuff like this had any effect on a suicidal man who was apparently close to her? That young men succeed in suicide more often than girls isn't really the point. Indeed, the more callous among us would say that it was quite nice for young men finally to find something that …
/r/MensRights02/07/15 06:04 AM
56

That whole article is dripping with contempt for boys and men who commit suicide. The last time I suggested that suicides should be left to get on with it, I received a small number of letters from people whose sons had killed themselves. All of them demanded an apology. I'd advise them this time to save their stamps because, you see, I don't care.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 03:00 AM
25

Very depressing. I hope she doesn't have any other male children. EDIT: Sadly, she does. One that she abandoned when he was young, even.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:42 AM
9

"Falling" pregnant to him. Disgusting how they make her the passive party.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:22 AM
10

worried you'll be called misogynists Yeah, that concern is pretty stupid. Opponents of men's rights will call the MRM misogynist anyway, regardless of a link with TRP.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 03:54 PM
3

ready to throw TRP under the bus. I don't think most people here want to do that. I think that TRP, which is basically strategy for attracting women, is irrelevant to men's rights, and it's kind of pointless to try and draw a link between them. But as a guide for lonely men and men struggling with romance, I think it's fine. No throwing under any buses there.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 03:49 PM
5

After it passed by a 116-to-5 vote in New Zealand's parliament Seems like it.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 03:41 PM
1

I don't think women pay any more heed to think of the children than others. Though I'm pretty sure they do so for think of the women.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 03:34 PM
29

Children don't vote. And think about the women will always be more effective than think about the children. In fact, the latter is even used as a slogan to mock censorship more than support it.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 11:58 AM
19

White Knighting is a social disease.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 09:06 AM
104

I've always maintained that women will be politicians' greatest allies for internet censorship.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:29 AM
2

the fact that either sex feels sex segregated lines and public transit is necessary for any reason. If anything it just creates additional paranoia. The only problem I see with this is that women insist on opening up services and facilities for men to themselves while keeping theirs exclusive. Before they did that, a lot of facilities used to be segregated by gender and it used to work fine. Now it's just more stress for the men because of the women's paranoia. And you can't do anything about th…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 07:27 AM
1

there really are female only lines, buses and train cars As an Indian, I'm happy with this arrangement. I don't need rape-paranoid women around me when taking my crowded morning commute (or at any other time, tbh). It's good for both genders. I just wish that the wimonz were courteous enough to stick to their own coaches instead of crowding the non-female ones, but that's often too much to expect I guess.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 07:04 AM
2

"Women don't want to oppress PoC immigrant maids by making them mop up the splattered bits of brain caused by gunshots. Unlike oppressive boys and men". Same argument that that AMR clown made to you up the thread.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 04:46 AM
1

The only solution when you are going through such a thing is to pull your boots up, find a solution, and fucking deal with it. More or less accurate, but dealing with it does involve seeking treatment. Which I did. I also spoke to some people at work. Not in a looking for empathy way, but so that I could take a pay cut and reduce my working hours at my job when I was very suicidal. I offered to quit if that arrangement wasn't acceptable but fortunately it was. "Talking about problems" never work…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 04:32 AM
2

They do the same with: Male victims of rape (It doesn't count because a lot of it is in prison). Violence against men (doesn't count because men aren't attacked for being men) Women aren't attacked for being women either, that's feminist fiction. And men are most definitely attacked for being men in war where many of them are automatically considered combatants. Circumcision (widespread religiously and culturally encouraged circumcision of boys is not a problem because a handful of cultures do s…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 04:04 AM
13

However, "sex positive" feminists didn't make much of a fuss when feminists aligned with the far right in Sweden and Canada to ensure that males buying sex would be thrown in prison "Sex positivity" is for female sexuality, not male. For any feminist issue, you have to add a "for women" qualifier. So many people fail to do that.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 03:28 AM
1

if you do not consider yourself a feminist, you support neither women's rights nor gender equality in general. Am I required to support women's rights? I won't oppose them as long as they aren't detrimental to men's rights. That should be enough, IMO. The fish can support their own issues, they don't need us bicycles. And men can support our own issues.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 10:00 AM
17

"The empathetic sex".
/r/MensRights30/06/15 05:49 AM
3

The whole heterosexuality is patriarchal and evil thing is such a pathetic attempt to get laid.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 03:21 AM
3

These are as cringeworthy as those "le patriarchy" comics that male feminuts keep coming up with.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 02:28 AM
2

Misandry is more accurate than androphobia. They don't really fear men, that's just an attempt at acting the victim. They hate us.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 09:24 AM
1

This is why I keep saying that the MRM must gender its issues. We need a strong focus on male homelessness and narrowing issues by gender to apply to men will help that.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 07:26 AM
3

Better focus. Gender all our issues. As far as the MRM is concerned, violence should be a men's issue, same for genital mutilation, same for domestic violence, rape and suicide. Not men are victims too, but just men are victims. Make men's issues independent and the efforts to fix them more focussed.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 02:25 PM
3

It's another attempt at the wimonz = victims, men = victimizers propaganda. Even that dragon tattoo film was adapted from some white knight's book called "men who hate women".
/r/MensRights27/06/15 08:41 AM
3

"Let's not forget that women are the real victims here".
/r/MensRights27/06/15 05:34 AM
5

Vows don't mean shit but a quaint ceremonial part of a woman's "biggest day".
/r/MensRights27/06/15 05:31 AM
22

Didn't his first wife cheat on him or abandon him or something and the second one beat him? He most definitely isn't a misogynist, but if he wanted to be one, I'd totally understand.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 04:59 PM
5

Actually, any instance of "injustice against women" in less developed countries is held up as evidence of the country's evil patriarchal society. Male criminals are stoned to death under sharia but you only hear about how deplorable it is when it's a woman receiving that punishment. And now when there is evidence of a woman getting away easily and a general trend of women receiving lighter sentences, everyone falls over themselves to deny that women receive special treatment.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 04:43 PM
2

It should surprise me I guess, but it really doesn't. TERFs are basically the "men are men and women are women" type, so them agreeing with the pillers kind of makes sense. Actually, I believe that feminists (not just TERFs) have more of a problem with MRAs than with TRP. They just don't like the insults that the redpillers lob at women. They don't have any problem with all the "be the boss of the relationship/be stoic/maintain frame" stuff. Because red pill guys fit the caricature of masculinit…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 06:55 AM
1

Unexpected, but nice to see. I hope they deign to throw a few more bones men's way.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 03:26 AM
2

Then why is he butthurt about feminists being spoken of in less than flattering terms? I do think there is not much separating the pillers from the feminists (feminists seem far more active and eager for discussion on places like purplepilldebate than here), but usually they aren't so open about it.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 02:57 AM
3

There are legitimate issues facing men in America 3 years ago, getting one of you to even admit that was like pulling teeth. Now I see it admitted often. You people even add it to your posts and articles as some sort of disclaimer. It's a welcome change from all the "cry moar" stuff that used to be thrown around during discussions of men's issues. Even misandry went from being "not real" to "being expressed ironically". And you aren't even the ones MRAs are trying to convince, non-feminists are.…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 02:52 AM
14

This is what a feminist looks like.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 07:59 AM
2

Probably earning less these days due to chrome's market dominance, and now desperately trying to appear "socially conscious" or something. I think their browser will continue to lose market share.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:35 AM
1

Hunter gatherer societies also have higher male mortality and constant warfare. And agriculture creates more food surpluses that can feed those who wouldn't otherwise be able to obtain their own food. Like the old and the sick. I'm more inclined to believe that there was less inequality in resource distribution in agricultural societies.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:31 AM
2

MGTOW is not a problem because it may reduce the birth-rate. It won't. It's a problem because men who aren't chasing women will reduce their economic output and consumption, and the tax revenue that can be squeezed out of them.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:24 AM
2

I don't really care if they separate the discourse. Won't make male circumcision any less of an issue for men.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:59 AM
4

Since no will ever have sex in the manner that feminists demand (asking for explicit verbal consent for each micro-escalation of a sexual encounter) the only solution is to teach women to be more assertive. This is never going to happen unless men start putting the onus more and more on women to initiate, escalate and drive the sexual encounters and relationships. Women by themselves will never give up that expectation of men to read their minds and do exactly as they want.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 08:01 AM
3

It is if you have the right views, but the "discussion" is restricted to the minutiae of feminist dogma, like how many suffragettes can dance on the head of a pin.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 03:37 AM
2

More rich women demanding stuff.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 03:27 AM
1

The Palestinians are far, far more disapproving of homosexuality than Israel.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 03:22 AM
0

So, this is the new politicomedian idiot to take up that Stewart fellow's mantle and attack "acceptable" targets.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 08:30 AM
21

mother ... think before acting and affecting thousands of lives. That doesn't necessarily follow. We have got to stop this unwarranted pedestalization of mothers as especially caring beings. It's not a given that they are.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 02:34 AM
2

America A democracy where the majority of the voting population is female.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 12:01 PM
3

as men you have more clout in politics. Your voice is often times actually taken more seriously to the people making decisions. Saying this in a thread about an issue MRAs have been trying to bring attention to for a very long time, but is only acknowledged when feminists deign to do something about it.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 11:49 AM
0

Which other men? From what I know, men in general are far more likely to admit that men have legitimate social disadvantages than feminists or even women. If you mean those men who exploit other men for their own gain or feminist men, you won't find much disagreement here.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:40 AM
4

If feminism is the antithesis of the MRM, why are feminists the first ones to help out with one of the major MR issues? Maybe because it's getting harder for them to justify ignoring the issues? Men's issues have been receiving attention of late, and there is a trend of fewer and fewer people being willing to identify as feminists. Maybe one of the few feminists who is genuinely concerned about this matter proposed it and the justification for rejection wasn't convincing enough. Maybe they thoug…
/r/MensRights18/06/15 06:06 AM
1

GWW had a post somewhere detailing what happened to Earl Silverman. Basically, he ran into a bureaucratic maze while attempting to fund it and had to finance it out of his own pocket for much of the time.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 01:55 AM
9

Feminism is the movement with power and resources, especially in Sweden. I'm very happy they are doing this and it is a credit to them. But, do you also credit the "patriarchy" for giving women their rights? The people with power make things happen. It's no different here.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 01:16 AM
7

How does this centre define rape for men? Does it include all male victims or only victims of male rapists?
/r/MensRights18/06/15 01:13 AM
2

Equality is not relevant to feminism. "Women's equality" is.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 12:07 AM
2

So basically the concern is that a book criticizing the notions of masculinity, if the author buys into feminist ideology, would with high probability lay the blame of male suffering at the door of men? Indeed. I see the worry, but in that case, I would think a cautious response rather than an outright negative one would be more appropriate. Benefit of the doubt would be more reasonable to expect if this were the first time we were seeing something like this from someone who identifies as a femi…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:41 AM
2

Why not come up with a different name instead? I thought "traditional gender role" more or less covered it. For either gender. Narrow definitions of feminity aren't called "toxic feminity". Denying that narrow definitions of masculinity exist Most here don't deny it. In the case of "toxic masculinity" the objection is to the gendering of a negative phenomenon. for the sake of spiting feminists, is throwing men who are hurt by those narrow definitions under the bus. I don't object to it to spite …
/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:43 AM
0

What has strategy for bedding women got to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:12 AM
6

machismo of "man up, don't talk about your problems." I agree that that is a problem. However, the term "toxic masculinity" is inappropriate. It's a deliberate attempt at associating toxicity with maleness. Even though it is dressed up as fake concern for men's well being. It is an example of how a movement that sees oppression in gendered terms explicitly genders their own bogeymen.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 02:03 AM
1

It's not an issue relevant to feminists or women. Men and those for men's rights should oppose it.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 04:33 AM
2

You can't really expect any better from those of her sort.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:45 AM
7

As they say, there are no feminists on a sinking ship. Literally proved by suffragettes on the Titanic.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:39 AM
10

Agreed. But it isn't a "feminist issue".
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:11 PM
2

Genital mutilation is not a "male issue". It's a human issue. That it may be, but because it wasn't considered a male or human issue, the MRM had to pick it up. Now we have it covered as an issue for all humans, only it is divided up between two different movements. I'm fine with that. I think for the MRM it is a male issue and it should be so. But as we learn in feminist circles so quickly, men aren't human. And that's why I said it doesn't make sense to look for support for male issues on that…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 01:01 PM
2

kittens and puppies are cute "A dog is an oppressive rapist's (man's) best friend". So there will be some disagreement over the cuteness of puppies.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 08:14 AM
1

https://archive.is/sH9uE Also, it's by a male author, so his credentials as a feminist are open to dispute, nevermind his mansplaining about what should be a feminist issue.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:45 AM
1

Males are a minority of the electorate. The politicians will act accordingly.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:10 AM
1

act like a 12-year old whenever anyone calls you out on your stupidity I was just reading this thread over in AMRSucks.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:54 AM
1

It's good information, regardless of where it's "leaking" from.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:23 AM
8

It's a site for women. You aren't going to see much empathy for male issues there.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:21 AM
1

cowardly, whining jerk-offs that are male feminists They aren't all like that. Many are sociopaths. See Hugo Schwyzer, or that Gomeshi fellow. Or all the male feminist politicians.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 03:24 AM
8

Think of the children doesn't stand a chance against think of the women.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:46 AM
1

Indeed. That is what is a men's rights issue, not the brutalization of women.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 07:40 AM
7

One of the few topics here that has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:50 AM
-1

It worked great for another group, we should learn from them.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 05:51 AM
26

I'm totally OK with parents not piercing an infant's ears. Let the child decide for themselves when they grow up.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 03:44 AM
1

From what I understand, they believe that most women are immediately turned off by submissive behaviour. So, you can't be alpha by red pill definition if you are submissive sometimes. "Losing frame" or something they call it. They don't deny that there are women who aren't turned off by their partner being submissive, but those are apparently a very small minority and irrelevant to the red pill generalizations. I do think what the red pill has to say about hetero relationships is more or less on…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 02:29 AM
0

I've maintained for a long time that like women we must also gender all our issues. The MRM must only concern themselves with male victims of any issue.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:39 AM
1

Modern feminists don't need Mill, much like modern physicists don't need Gallileo OK
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:16 AM
6

So... feminists and red pill types are united in their hatred of unassertive men.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 04:22 PM
2

Feminism has been going strong for over a century. And during all of that time, it's had a lot of male supporters. Can't see that changing anytime soon. There'll always be enough men with cripplingly low self-esteem, or sociopathic tendencies to latch onto political movements they feel they can gain from.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:49 PM
3

Can't say he doesn't deserve the erasure. He willingly supported people like these.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:29 PM
29

It's really cringeworthy to see men still so desperate to be feminists even after told in no uncertain terms, multiple times, and over a long period of time by prominent feminists that they aren't eligible to be.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 09:58 AM
1

Like it matters. Fashion matters a lot to those who complain about things like that. And not many options out there if you're looking for fashion in your tech.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 08:59 AM
1

She's also an egalitarian feminist and there was apparently also a Powerpuff Girls episode which mocked the Tumblrite/Radfem crowd's entire worldview. Nope.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 06:43 AM
4

Go away shithead
/r/MensRights08/06/15 05:28 AM
2

Men who don't cry, men who are strong and confident are respected by feminists, even if they're actual abusers. Exactly. See that Gomeshi guy or Hugo Schwyzer.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 08:43 AM
3

A lot of "anarchists" think consensus is all that matters. So if in an anarchist society there is a consensus that free speech ought to be restricted, then society must restrict it.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:13 AM
-1

reinforcing a whole other generation of men who will simply refuse to have anything to do with being nice Which is not a bad thing. Being nice requires effort. Being indifferent doesn't. If niceness is contemptible to some, all the better to abandon it towards them and offer indifference. Saves you effort. I don't see a downside. You can't teach someone to both share and that he needs to provide for himself at all cost. You can't teach someone to both care for others needs, while telling him tha…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 02:28 PM
1

No, I never said it shouldn't matter. Just that we can consider sexual assault of boys and men a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 02:06 PM
16

Niceness is wasted on women. They seem to have such contempt for it.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:43 AM
1

No, it's a boy being victimized. It's a men's rights issue, not a human rights issue. Rape in general may be a human rights issue, but women already have a movement to take up their side of that issue. We need to take it up for men.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:05 AM
3

Yet women can’t emancipate by themselves. They need to cooperate with men, who remain persistently out of the picture. Men should be included in this debate. No thanks. Men have the MRM now. You can keep your debates to yourself. Fish don't need bicycles. They are only looking to change their tune because the magazine isn't selling due to feminists' well-deserved reputation.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 08:58 AM
5

prevent the spreading of intolerance and will be supervised by a mass media complaints commission. I've said it numerous times that women will be politicians' greatest allies in censoring and rendering the internet as toothless as other mass media where most common people are reduced to being consumers instead of participants. Politicians are just looking for an excuse to extend control over what people can do on the internet, and the think of the women argument works every time.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 08:04 AM
10

Also notable is that the drive to reintroduce conscription was headed by a female president and another female politician. It's easier to send someone off to their death when you can't empathize with them or their situation. In general, which gender do you think would find it easier to put themselves into the shoes of forced cannon fodder?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 12:38 PM
2

We aren't stopping them from doing their own thing. Just showing support. There aren't any attempts being made to appropriate gay issues.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 02:17 AM
3

What a feminist looks like. Also, after "bathing in male tears" she shed some crocodile tears (female tears?) over Robin Williams' suicide.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:18 AM
1

And yet you neglect to mention that for 99% of our history, "hypergamous instincts" were kept under wraps via actual egalitarianism, enforced by both men and women. If you mean hunter-gatherers, that was unrestrained hypergamy. High mortality rates from poor health, disease and violence, and only those who managed to survive that reproduced. The old, weak and the frail had little opportunity and it is borne by the fact that hunter gatherers were generally taller and more robust than the farmers …
/r/MensRights28/05/15 03:32 PM
2

Yeah. I see no problem with her views here and while I personally have no use for TRP stuff (beta and happy, don't care about being alpha or whatever), I do think that TRP views are accurate when it comes to most hetero relationships and a lot of men need that knowledge.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:47 AM
5

The usual crap about feminism being a movement for equality but equality doesn't mean equal support for rape victims. Yes we care about male victims but why should we be required to extend support to them? What exactly does the "care" entail then? "Oh poor you" type of lip-service? Some are even blaming him for intruding upon spaces for female victims. Nothing about the behaviour of the feminists in that thread is surprising (apart from the lack of feminists calling him a liar, I was expecting s…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 06:14 AM
1

subjective choices made by judges and juries (i.e. construable as the effect of cultural gender roles) Subjective choices in those matters may not arise purely or even largely from a belief in distinct gender roles. They can just as easily be inspired by bias or bigotry.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 08:58 AM
1

It didn't impact how they were treated with regard to child custody before feminists managed to make custody default to women. Why would it do so now?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 08:56 AM
4

Discrimination against men in (say) family court is a serious issue. The main cause of that discrimination is gender roles. No, it is not. It is the result of decades of lobbying by women to turn the laws in their favour. I don't care about gender roles, but they are not the cause of the poor treatment of men in family disputes.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 05:30 AM
0

I completely support the original feminist movement Then you aren't an MRA, much less a "radical" one.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 05:25 AM
3

Also, when it comes to tech, almost all the people working in their spare time and giving away their high quality work for free are men. It is one of very few industries where sharing and openness is valued so highly. While most whining about copyright and restrictions upon use of work within the tech community comes from the digital art types, who constantly complain about people using some image they doodled, without permission. You can look up and compare the gender ratio among programmers to…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 06:23 PM
-1

the women are being used as easy bake ovens for new warlords. If anything this film is very disrespectful towards women since it suggests they're only good for breeding. A narrative that closely follows the women = victims of violent, brutish men line? I don't think they could get any more feminist if they tried.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 10:28 AM
3

feminism isn't the only enemy of equal rights and social expectations for men Nobody says it is.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 10:05 AM
2

To be honest, whatever little concern they fake is due to having no response to being called out. So they grudgingly admit that some issues may be legitimate. I would say that kind of "support" is useful, but it isn't genuine and I wouldn't start to believe that they are "on board". They're only on board because it's easier being on than off.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 10:01 AM
3

The moderates exist. But only because they provide cover to the radicals. "Look here! Look at me!! I'm a real feminist!! Not the ma-, er, person behind the curtain!"
/r/MensRights25/05/15 09:47 AM
3

radical feminists always blame "Cis-Men" and not gay men Gay men are cis men.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 12:42 PM
3

Fully immersive VR is what can do it very well, sex androids would be clunky and carry a huge social stigma.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 02:53 PM
9

men and women tend to have equal influence on where their groups lives and who they live with Yeah, and the equal influence could still favour certain groups and discriminate against others, i.e. don't want someone who looks old or weak, maybe. So it's really just egalitarianism in selecting who gets to be in the group not egalitarianism in the sense that all members of the society are considered equal. I don't know why there has been such a desperate push in recent years to paint prehistoric hu…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 12:50 PM
2

Someone large who can "protect" them, aka. "need a dad instead of a partner".
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:32 AM
3

Or just give them any random kid when they leave the maternity ward.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 04:08 AM
5

female patriarch is an oxymoron.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 03:17 AM
7

And everybody is concerned with them, just that the concern is segregated by sex.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:34 AM
3

And? Their movement is pretty successful. Maybe we should learn something and focus on our own issues and leave them to theirs.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:19 AM
2

Them being the minority doesn't make any difference since they are as bad, or in the case of the second wave, even worse than the third wave ones.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:13 AM
6

as if you don't care about these girls' suffering. Must we? I thought there were enough people paying attention to that issue.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:07 AM
4

I am eternally grateful to guys for complimenting me on my appearance. It's usually they who do so. Compliments from women apart from my long term partner have been practically non-existent.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 04:08 AM
46

So she took a picture of him and shared it with others like herself on social media, and he is the creep.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:52 AM
12

"Nobody likes insecurity, I'm not your mother, But what good will complaining do?, You know you've got to fix this, etc. etc." I trust my psych pills to offer more support than others.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:24 AM
1

Regardless of whether there is a danger or not, people don't need to be in visible positions of power to exercise power. In a democracy, the voting population decides who should be in power. And in many democracies, the majority of voters are women. The most likely form of a female supremacist society would be people in power who, regardless of their own gender, further the interests of wom en and a huge working population of men financing it with their productivity.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:00 AM
3

Maybe these fuckers should question why boys and men spending an excessive amount of time on games and porn do so? Maybe it makes their lives happier or less stressful?
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:37 AM
1

If you are a feminist, you are already anti men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:24 AM
1

Satire or not, if implemented in a way to ensure that the woman's consent is genuine (text messages? Verified email accounts? Phone number? Assigned keys?) and the app's use encouraged, it could help a lot of men. A little bit of evidence is still better than none at all. I think men are usually not averse to advice to protect themselves better. And currently, I think they are in need of protection. There's still the problem of "omg don't you trust me???", but its use could be encouraged through…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:15 AM
9

It's shaming. A lot of men have self-esteem low enough to take the shaming to heart. Feminism is practically built upon shaming men and it's a very successful ideology.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:55 AM
1

I don't really need their respect.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:46 AM
1

Within the context of gender issues, patriarchy mostly refers to the feminist bogeyman, so most of the time that confusion will happen. I don't think we should be encouraging further ambiguous use of the term in that context.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 10:08 AM
1

It is Christian propaganda, but it is not "patriarchal". A patriarchal message would admonish women and praise men. This does the opposite.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:47 AM
14

Toxic feminity. Entitlement to money earned by men.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 04:23 AM
15

Nobody wants to listen to his mansplaining. What he did was "not ok" and just incredibly "gross".
/r/MensRights05/05/15 01:08 AM
37

Fuck off fishy, the bicycles don't owe you shit.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 02:56 PM
5

Toxic feminity. The irresistible urge to make a victim out of oneself in all situations.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 09:46 AM
3

There was some feminist in here a fair amount of time ago who was very proud of the fact that she had gay friends who would indulge her wish for a threesome with a partner. That was most definitely sexual objectification and a disgusting form of narcissism (I'm soooo hot even gay men jump into bed with me!)
/r/MensRights03/05/15 07:26 AM
1

Yep. Most of the handful of compliments I've received for my appearance have been from other men. And I am extremely grateful for those.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:40 AM
3

A man's attractiveness is very much dependent on who he is or what he does though.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 02:59 PM
2

I prefer to leave the issues of the fish to them. They can manage without us bicycles.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:39 AM
2

Mostly female class... never going to happen. Also, from my experience, trying to prove your points or attempting to convince doesn't work on an audience like that. Social shaming, ostracization, condescension, etc. does. Think of the last time you tried something like what you are trying now. Was the response a patient and reasoned counter-argument or "omg! I can't even talk to you right now!" or "Sure sweetie, buh bye now and go have a date with your hand". You'll just be wasting your time and…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:20 AM
4

Either way, chasing women has little to do with men's rights. And I contest they won't help a lonely man. From what I've seen it certainly works on a lot of women. I am not attracted to women like that, but my sexuality is not really mainstream. They'll give him bad advice and tell him that women aren't his friend. Women aren't supposed to be "your friend".
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:31 AM
2

There is little crossover and what they discuss is irrelevant to MR, but that doesn't mean that their advice and methods won't help a lonely man. I don't post there and I personally have no use for their methods, but that doesn't make them wrong or useless.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:28 AM
5

This is why the wage gap exists. Pretty sure it exists in favour of the women in certain age demographics and urban areas.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 12:10 PM
4

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 09:16 AM
2

There is nothing you can say. When someone dismisses male suicides as irrelevant compared to suicide attempts, you know they are incapable of any empathy towards men. You just realize that your contempt is too good for them and walk away.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:55 PM
15

Yeshh... Paul-Emma lawsuit this summmmmeeerrr.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 05:19 AM
1

Couldn't have been a very big rally. From what I've noticed, most SJWs are white.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:37 AM
1

Not really. Some people are beneath contempt. This is one of them.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:40 PM
2

From my own experience, maybe remove the stigma attached to medication for mental illness and depression. When it comes to depression, lots of people still seem to think "talking it out" with a psychotherapist is a better option, and try to discourage the use of drugs to treat it. Medication works for me and helps with the day-to-day stuff both at work and at home. And along those lines, maybe a better support network for men suffering from mental illness. Allowing them to qualify for certain ki…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:02 PM
5

I would be afraid they would make a video of it and place it on youtube for the world to see. Far more likely, it's a robbery and the woman is there to lure targets to someplace where her accomplices are waiting.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:19 AM
9

If an attractive young woman comes up to some average guy on the street that way, he's got to know something is wrong. Exactly. The chance that it is genuine romantic interest is infinitesimal compared to the possibility of him being the mark in an impending crime.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:14 AM
1

What percentage of self reporting feminists do you feel share this hatred of boys and men? The overwhelming majority. For a group that considers innocuous gendered terms (chairman, actress, etc.) to be evidence of society-wide "misogyny", they love to explicitly gender (as masculine) the social ills they claim to be fighting. How do you feel that these feminists are restricting people's ability to discuss the issues with different terminology? They aren't. Non-feminists discuss male issues witho…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:37 PM
1

It's a genuine answer. And I feel that is the reason behind their choice of terms and why the vocabulary can't be changed.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:49 PM
1

conspiracy Well, you seem to have decided that I subscribe to some conspiracy theory, so good faith is likely to be wasted on you. Clearly, I meant hatred of boys and men by feminists.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:03 PM
1

Hatred.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:49 AM
3

Recent posts about her in the sub have seen a lot of brigading and apologism for her ugly politics.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:46 AM
2

I have often expressed my opinion that women leaders would opt for war sooner because the armed forces are overwhelmingly male, and a male leader who can imagine himself being in their shoes would be more hesitant to start conflicts than a female one. Considering Hillary Clinton's views on the lives of male soldiers, she is most definitely someone who cannot empathize with boys and men. And as you pointed out, this is clear from her warmongering politics.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 11:44 AM
1

There is a reason why the vocabulary is the way it is. Why all the bogeymen allude to men and their nature (patriarchy, toxic masculinity, testosterone poisoning) while the force that fights these ghastly evils is feminism. It isn't going to change simply because those terms are central to the ideology.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:58 AM
1

It makes me wonder this: why are "attempts" even brought up? Because of an inability to empathize with men among these people.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:50 AM
9

It is relevant because if elected, she will soon have a lot of power over the armed forces, which are primarily made up of (and which target) people whose victimization in wars she considers secondary to that of those like herself.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 05:25 PM
1

If I had more to say to you, I would. But I haven't.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 05:12 PM
2

What makes me "exhibit A?" Your comment history in this sub. Please substantiate your statement. To you? Why?
/r/MensRights18/04/15 05:01 PM
2

Well, considering your recent post history in this sub, you definitely seem molded by that college student cast. I'd advise others here to look at you as "exhibit A" instead of an exception.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 03:23 PM
40

Why are college students so mindless? They have become more annoying than teen rebels.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 06:00 AM
5

Some guy posted here about being suicidal once. One of the feminists from that sub came down to say something like "one down, a few thousand more to go".
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:09 AM
3

Toxic feminity.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:43 AM
1

The Buddha was referring to the notion of women becoming Buddhist monks, not just Buddhists. And given that throughout history, the overwhelming majority of people who have looked to escape "worldly attachments" (which includes sex with women) have been men, you can hardly expect the notion of women being monks to make sense to someone heading a monastic order that promoted celibacy as a virtue among monks and saw desire as a source of suffering.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:36 AM
3

Even my psychiatrist told me straight off the bat, "You have to learn to get out of the depression and not be suicidal". Cool, it was up to me all along then, and now I only go to him for the drugs, which help far, far more than any kind of "talking" has so far. Pills are a far better "support system" for males than other people are.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:12 AM
3

Rather, they're putting pets above men. Pets would sooner receive protection against violence and abuse than men.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:13 AM
7

They always were and still are. Just in a different way to what these people consider "objectification".
/r/MensRights13/04/15 05:02 AM
1

It could be better re-phrased so that the scum label isn't ambiguous. But I think most here know who that refers to. As to feminists quote mining it, I don't really care. I think it accurately expresses my feelings towards them.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 03:24 AM
13

And some people have the gall to say that we should "work together" with the scum.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 04:37 PM
17

Lack of empathy.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:50 PM
5

Just muh feels, really. There seems to have been (I don't know if it's accurate, I don't follow American politics closely) talk of her since some 15 years ago about wanting to be the head of state. Then she couldn't achieve a nomination 7-8 years ago. And now she's still at it. Just seems like she wants the power really, really bad. I'm not voting in your election anyway, so my opinion of her isn't going to affect anything.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 05:13 PM
99

I'm not American but she comes across as someone extremely desperate to wield power. Scary.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:41 PM
4

I just wish feminists would see the glaring elephant in the room and apply that same logic to the name of their own movement. Well, they've only had like 150 odd years to do it. Any time now.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:29 PM
2

I remember reading some SRS clown's comment a long time ago that said that if it weren't for the SJW types (victim studies, sociology, etc. graduates), engineers and scientists would have nuked the earth many times over or committed genocide trying to be eugenicists or something.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:28 PM
2

Feminists.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 12:23 PM
1

Well, we shouldn't. We should leave the women's issues to them and focus on our own.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 12:12 PM
1

I didn't know the MRM "fought for" rape jokes about women.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:41 AM
11

Using the word "manned" is misogyny, but naming an oppressive society-wide multi-generational conspiracy by men to keep women down, "the patriarchy" isn't hateful at all.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:26 AM
1

The child was male so of course the real victim in the case is someone else. Pretty sure the burden he forced her into through him being a dependant contributed to this unfortunate event.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:17 AM
4

This is one of the reasons why there will always be a social hierarchy and why social classes will never really go away.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:28 AM
237

Isn't this the one who thinks falsely accusing someone of rape is hilarious?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:43 AM
1

"I'm not saying it's good, but the guy was driving a nice car."
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:34 AM
9

Pretty sure he does. What with the rape culture and 1 in 1 wxmxnz being raped twice a day.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:01 AM
0

I wouldn't mind a better segregation of seating. But that means no allowing women in the men's train coach or similar.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:19 PM
2

She doesn't "have to" do anything. She can refuse to settle or whatever. On-topic: Happy not being whatever the article paints as un-wimpy.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:44 PM
4

University student union... Guy is probably anti-male already. I'm sure he took the treatment like a real feminist should.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 12:14 PM
6

Every single one, even the very short, fat and unattractive ones with no job, no car and horrible personalities, still had more men coming to them than just about every other guy I know and every guy I have talked/listened to about this. I wish I could find it now but there was a comic on tumblr drawn by an overweight woman that listed all the men she dated (and there were a fair few of them) and how they didn't care about her being overweight and how therefore women should not obsess about losi…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:33 AM
3

I prefer to let the fish worry about their own issues. They don't need us.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 11:10 AM
96

When you think of someone as sub-human, you don't really apply the same standards to them that you'd apply to humans.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 11:07 AM
3

She could have easily turn her brain off and written everyone here off as sexists. She already did something like that by writing off an entire gender as potential rapists.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:55 AM
1

I respect her I have to defend myself and my gender for things I absolutely despise. Also, respect to Anna for coming here to comment. these petty callouts are truly degrading, even more so because they are well intended. Too bad, we don't have self-esteem low enough to "respect" someone who calls all of our gender potential rapists, unless we are educated to refrain from being so while we are growing up. Please don't down vote her, it isn't a disagree button. That her post is not in the negativ…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:41 AM
1

I used the term because it was used by the person I was replying to.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:31 AM
5

phobia (plural phobias or phobiæ) An irrational or obsessive fear or anxiety, usually of or about something particular. There is nothing "irrational" about fearing a situation in which you can have your life ruined.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:24 AM
-3

Why? I feel she should. If you don't, you're free to ask m'lady to stay.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:11 AM
-6

I'm already practicing "self-censorship" since I don't care to read what she typed up. Stop replying to my comments and I will stop posting in this thread.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 03:16 AM
-6

I didn't ask the mods to block or ban. I'm sure she's going to go cry to her followers about how the rapist boys and men here "harassed" her. The sooner she goes away the better for everyone. I am only concerned about this because she seems to have a following she can spew her disgusting "little boys are innate rapists and their rapist tendencies need to be discouraged while they're growing up" message at them. Personally, I have heard enough from her from that video and have no interest in list…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 02:32 AM
7

Don't know, don't care. Probably just her Twitter or YouTube army of people who like... well, whatever she is famous for.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:57 AM
-10

Go away.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:49 AM
6

What a revolting and execrable individual.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:34 AM
1

Niceness is wasted on those who only have contempt for it. They don't deserve the effort that goes into being polite, courteous and attentive.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:26 AM
3

So he hates cosplaying women, not women in general.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 10:27 AM
1

I used to play Halo multiplayer on PC some 10 years ago. I wasn't a bad player and there were certainly a lot of sane and friendly players around. But I stopped playing on random public servers because all the "lol fuckin gay noob pwned ur mom sux my d1ck lololololol" nonsense got really tiresome. And it's not just the 12 year olds that act like that, see GNAA and the like for middle-aged people behaving similarly. It's just not fun having to deal with them and fun is why I've always played vide…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 12:31 AM
1

I agree with them. I don't want to force the MRA label on her, but going by the support she has shown for the issues of boys and men, she definitely doesn't qualify as a feminist.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 03:12 PM
3

One of the examples of what a feminist Gor novel (wank fodder) may look like.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:09 AM
3

Not just a date but, "men smile and socialize and create boys networks with each other that they patriarchize in, while freezing women out with cold or indifferent expressions and minimal socialization".
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:31 AM
2

...like a fish (living being) emapthizes with a bicycle (non living tool or object).
/r/MensRights25/03/15 06:01 AM
1

I used to love KDE 3 but I dropped them after the KDE 4 fiasco in 2008. Less usable, fewer features, and complaints met with bizarre pronouncements like "lol retard, a .0 release is not stable but pre-pre-alpha and you should thank the heavens if it works" killed all my interest. Last I heard, they lost a lot of users over that and I can't say they didn't deserve it. GNOME has always sucked though and has always been used by Red Hat and other companies to push their crap. Never liked it.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:24 AM
1

I think that's a bit much for men to expect. Disappointment is not a good feeling.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 05:48 PM
1

Twitter seems a pretty SJW'y company themselves. I will save my concern for someone more deserving.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 05:46 PM
5

In fact, I wonder if 'the patriarchy' is projecting women's in-group bias onto men. IMO, that's exactly what it is. It's also why they have that bizarre "feminism means women are people" slogan. Since they always paint issues that affect everyone as only affecting women, and men who aren't living the high, privileged life are not even people but are completely invisible to them. They think that men have a similar view of them.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 02:20 AM
3

GWW with an insightful post from a few days ago: Cenk wants to believe that he's special. That he's enlightened compared to past generations of men. That he's exceptional. That men today are better than those rapey, oppressive bastards of yesteryear, and that progressive men today are better than those rapey oppressive conservatives. All based on how well they treat women. Just as conservatives in the US are fine throwing Islamic men under the bus, and Islamic men are fine throwing American men …
/r/MensRights18/03/15 01:25 AM
4

Her face looks similar to that passive-aggressive smiley tumblrites use. (◕‿◕✿)
/r/MensRights14/03/15 05:37 AM
5

When most drug dealers are women they will. Maybe crime bosses in Sweden ought to recruit female pushers.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 01:24 PM
0

Or maybe they just welcomed their new overlords.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:31 AM
8

"Toxic". Is it also "problematic"? Or maybe just, like "gross" and "icky"?
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:18 AM
2

You can't have it both ways, ladies. Oh, "having it all" is a pretty common aspiration among that demographic, regardless of whether it is possible or not.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 05:13 AM
2

So it's likely not a 'one-off' case. She also said in the email that she knows other women from across Europe who do the same as her. "Many female professors in Germany decided to no longer accept male Indian students for these reasons, and currently other European female association are joining"
/r/MensRights11/03/15 02:58 AM
1

Sadly, I agree. You read the opinions of proto-MRAs from the time feminism was taking off 100 years ago and they are applicable to the condition of men today. Nobody paid attention, and its unlikely they will now.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:45 AM
2

They're trying to create a female character and so looking for an actress. I don't see a problem. But it's going to end up like all that other crap trying to "get girls interested in science", i.e. have no such effect at all, and like the other efforts (pink hair salon Lego set or whatever) as a last ditch desperate attempt they'll have to add something stereotypical like relationship dramas to attract a female audience.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:28 PM
2

Does MRA have information on what their position is as far as feminine men and masculine women? There is no established position on the matter but most MRAs will agree that men should not be made to feel ashamed of their personality. So most are ok with what are considered "feminine qualities" in men. I myself am far from being stereotypically masculine. About masculine women, not really our issue.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:55 AM
6

What happened to the fish and the bicycle bullshit? This really, really needs to be stressed whenever all this #heforshe, #malefeminists or whatever comes up. As bicycles, we have nothing for the fishes. Go away and let us be.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 03:59 AM
3

The sisterhood is women's real family. Everyone else is a rapist.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 02:33 AM
22

this is for some reason really important, but we don't need more women soldiers, miners, roadworkers and such. Not "for some reason". The reason is that technology and engineering pays very well these days and it is a safe job. The other jobs are hazardous and low-status.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 08:01 AM
1

KKK fought for white male rights White (including white women) supremacy. Not "white male rights".
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:37 AM
4

I do the same thing, and it didn't take me losing my job over a joke to figure it out. Avoid women you don't know very well. It is better for both you (less chance of them taking offence over whatever) and for them (they are protected from jokes/rape/violence/murder/cannibalism/necrophilia by you, a male). His new workplace sounds like a good one to me. His mind will be more at ease and he will enjoy his work more.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:23 AM
2

Women in Tech.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:17 AM
4

And apparently, all about public masturbation as well, since you seem to be defending it so strongly.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 03:06 AM
10

If people like you are in there masturbating, yeah.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:56 AM
5

I prefer "femwhining" myself. Because it typically tends to have this screechy, omglikeewwwsogrossandoffendedhowdareyou!! tone.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:00 AM
6

I don't. I'd find it disgusting and would avoid the place.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 01:57 AM
3

Nope, it will then move on to "capital gains gap" or something. Like how its the stem gap in American universities now and not the huge gap between the overall number of female and male college students.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 12:52 AM
4

And after that they all went home and fapped to those books for the hundredth time.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 11:35 AM
3

I believe that both groups can work together. I, and many others here, don't. This "middle ground for feminists and men" thing has been tried plenty of times here on reddit. It doesn't work. Just leave the boards to the misandrists.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:32 AM
1

Because motherhood is already an "axis of oppression" (see reddit result). The patriarchal spawn is already tormenting the poor dear enough. It is misogynistic to expect her to make a fair contribution to his upbringing.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 01:34 PM
2

Lack of pedestalization = "lack of respect" Don't pay attention to their nonsense.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 02:34 AM
2

Well, he does lump the reddit MR stuff in with what they believe are the usual feminist villains. See the ridiculous "keep this away from Reddit" nonsense. His girlfriend's blog no seriously what about the menz was the same. A fair bit of concern followed up with the usual feminist drivel. For me he hasn't earned the benefit of the doubt. I have no problem with him doing his thing, and its great if he manages to convince some on the fence that men's issues are worth taking seriously, but I will …
/r/MensRights07/01/15 12:35 AM
2

He still leans feminist and associates with that girl who popularized the schroedinger's rapist thing over the internet. They come out with stuff from time to time that seems reasonable so that they can point back at it when someone criticizes their ideology too much. But anyone who is sympathetic to feminism is fundamentally against men. No exceptions. They may do it unknowingly, but their support of feminism contributes to making things worse for men.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 02:48 AM
9

That reminds me of the "be confident" advice. Not helpful at all when nobody can tell the difference between confidence and being an asshole. I'm like an atheist Ned Flanders. I'm kind. I'm soft spoken. I smile at everyone and say my P's and Q's. I don't "one up" people when talking about things. In my case, it isn't just about women and dating. My "natural" mode is being soft spoken, dealing with people with a smile, and trying to be accommodating. Which has only earned me ridicule at worst and…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 02:35 AM
17

Feminists hate us just for existing. Indeed most useless and deficient individuals in society Also “some of the gropiest, most misogynistic guys I’ve met have been of the shy and nerdy persuasion … In fact I think a shy/nerdy-normed world would be a significantly worse world for women.” Useless, most deficient, and most misogynistic individuals in society that make the world a significantly worse place for women. I said it in another thread. Nerds should do what they are being baselessly accused…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 02:26 AM
5

Yeah, white knights do favour women, but that doesn't mean other women don't do it as well. There are some female judges that see through the bullshit, but they are rare. The infamous (in MR circles) in-group bias study attests to that.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 01:07 PM
2

Looking out for their own.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 07:07 AM
1

Literally men complaining about men.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 02:49 AM
1

No, they would only be seen as the last vestiges of a burden the poor womynz have had to always carry.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 02:37 AM
2

He's our resident concern troll.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 08:46 AM
5

She's an A-plusser (the SJW version of atheism).
/r/MensRights27/12/14 07:12 AM
1

What has this to do with the examples?
/r/MensRights18/12/14 01:24 AM
2

I'm a guy. I haven't been raped but I have been the target of sexual groping and lewd comments a few times. (No you aren't required to listen, much less believe) I don't consider them to have had a very profound effect on me, and I prefer to just shrug them off. But I only mention them on the internet. Also because in my case the people being aggressive were male and cases of a man molesting another man often causes revulsion among people and they don't want to hear it, or they find it as amusin…
/r/MensRights18/12/14 01:18 AM
14

Lack of empathy for boys and men.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 12:50 AM
2

Just apologism for their bias. And evasion of commenting on the examples and looking to generalities to justify their bias. But I didn't expect much from the people in that sub. I stopped posting there precisely due to views like these.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 12:47 AM
1

I can only answer for myself. Do you support woman's suffrage (aka the right to vote) I don't oppose it. Do you accept any opinion that disagrees with the norm Not sure what you mean by norm. From what I see the opinions of most people here go against the norm. Are there any feminists in the twenty first century that you guys agree with Not really. I may be indifferent to some of their views if not in outright opposition, but the broken clock adage applies to them in the very rare cases where we…
/r/MensRights16/12/14 07:18 AM
4

We would all agree men get a bad wrap on some parts of our lives As long as people realize that and why men want to improve their condition, most here would be happy. I doubt anyone here is attached to the idea that men are "oppressed". Though by the SJW definition of the word, they certainly are.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 09:40 AM
22

There are no pros to chopping off an infant's body parts.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 02:05 PM
2

I don't care what they do as long as they stay out of male issues, and stop demonizing males on a social level. I don't care if they don't like males on a personal level; that's their problem. But that dislike shouldn't be allowed to affect society or harm males.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 02:37 AM
2

If a man wrote a memoir, said he touched his brother/sister inappropriately, called himself a "sexual predator", then came out and apologize and claim he was "misinterpreted"..... he would be crucified. Not a brother. These fuckers don't care about male children. Just keep the comparison limited to an older brother doing it to his younger sister. Bribing her so that he can make her up as a sexual stereotype (motorcycle chick), sweets in return for kissing her on the mouth, having her sit on him …
/r/MensRights11/12/14 01:14 AM
3

Maybe if in these cultures, they stopped expecting normal women (and men to a degree) to act like fucking madonnas, they could actually tell their partners the truth (that they've had sex, gasp) without jeopardizing their whole futures. There wasn't anything stopping her from telling the truth. Nobody's future would have been jeopardized if she did so. You see, India has a very low percentage of women that are economically active, meaning more of them rely on that marriage happening. It's very e…
/r/MensRights01/12/14 01:09 AM
2

Being male.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 07:01 AM
1

Calc is fine, but god damn statistics. So boring. :(
/r/MensRights29/11/14 04:52 AM
2

Likewise, we did some foundry and metal work in college. If you messed up a job, you needed to start over, because you can't rework pieces of metal if you've already cut more than the allowed tolerances. The girls got some dumbass guys to do their work for them.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 04:15 AM
1

Yep. Women lacking empathy for males is "patriarchy", i.e. men's fault.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 03:31 AM
3

The soldiers would be called male characters in female skins, or something to that effect.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 03:25 AM
1

We don't need to prove anything to anybody. If you can't see that males have issues and that there needs to be advocacy for them, you are welcome to fuck off.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 02:33 AM
2

Where are the people who claim fact gathering encourages "murder culture"? Using this logic, all criminal trials and investigations can be seen as supporting "crime culture". They do when the victim is a woman. It's called "violence against women" instead of murder culture, and no, you are not allowed to think that the alleged murderer or assaulter of such a higher form of being may be innocent. Go ask many women if there is a "culture of violence against women". You'll find that most will answe…
/r/MensRights29/11/14 02:21 AM
3

Personally I've never been sexual harassed but I have been in situations that have paralyzed me. I have been sexually groped. And I didn't know what to do. I also witnessed a teenaged boy fondling a little boy when I was about 7 or 8. I didn't know what to do then either, so I just ran away from there.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 03:54 PM
3

Other masterpieces and top voted comments like "TIL comets are the sperm of the universe" and replies to it that involved sexual references didn't get deleted. Because stuff like that strengthens their belief that males are just simple brutes that are easily amused. Males with strong opinions and feelings scare them.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 01:19 AM
1

That guy is so fucking cringeworthy.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 01:59 PM
69

Wow. I remember that thread even had a lot of people chiming in about how that reflected the divorces of their parents and family members and all those comments are deleted too. What a shithole that sub has become.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 01:54 PM
2

Translation: Men are responsible for people ignoring domestic violence against men.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 01:41 AM
0

How do YOU feel about the red pill as an MRA (if there's a difference)? It is irrelevant to men's rights. Men's rights has nothing to do with wooing women. How do YOU feel about the red pill as an individual? I have no use for it, but I think it works for a lot of people. If I weren't sexually atypical, I may have considered their advice. I think it is useful for men to gauge where they stand in their romantic relationships and to protect themselves. What do you think would be popular answers fr…
/r/MensRights27/11/14 01:31 AM
6

Males aren't really people to these people.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 12:44 AM
5

Highly upvoted too. When it's a sub known to quickly delete any topic supporting male issues. But what else can you expect from a feminut sub? For all their concern trolling, you can see what they really think when it comes to male children.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 12:10 AM
3

Thirded. Won't have to worry about keeping my inherent rapist tendencies in check.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:34 AM
2

Of course, it was a male child.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:30 AM
3

There was one in this sub who, in response to being told that children aren't property, said "pretty sure whatever comes out of my body is my property".
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:24 AM
2

fashion is more important than space travel. What a very female thing to say, and perhaps an explanation for the lack of women in STEM fields? lol He shouldn't have apologized though. I daresay he'd be seen in a better light even by feminists if he had refused to back down. His tearful apology only served to vindicate those clowns.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 12:05 AM
2

Not necessarily the same thing, but the word "masculine" can also be used to refer to anything relating to maleness. The term "toxic masculinity" is deliberately created to associate toxicity with being male. They use another [similar term] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testosterone_poisoning) that aims to associate male biology with toxicity as well.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 11:29 AM
2

Some people use "Singh" as part of their official name or have made it their official last name, but typically it's more of an honorific. It's common among people from traditionally "warrior" communities which the Sikhs were.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 06:43 AM
2

Being male is not toxic.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 06:24 AM
11

Shame. I thought that sub had been taking a turn for the better in the past few months. Any useful discussion of men and their issues (and the ones opposing solutions for them, guess who?) will now be shut down with this, leaving only the crappy articles like "20 things menz must do for womzen" that used to litter that place before.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:19 AM
4

I get "harassed" more by panhandlers and other people in a quarter of that time. Aye. I don't live in a first world country. We have groups of transgender people who are forced to make a living through begging. Their M.O. is to try and embarrass men by touching them all over and making suggestive comments so that they just get paid to go away. I get "harassed" by them almost everyday on my way to/from work (in fact I'm returning from work right now and this happened again just a few minutes ago)…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:44 PM
3

He's a concern troll.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:29 PM
13

I have decided that from now on I am going to treat women's issues with exactly the same amount of attention and concern as women do men's.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 06:43 PM
1

"I support treating men and women as equals, but I'm not a feminist or anything". Lip service doesn't mean much. See what kind of policies are being passed at universities and at the government level.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 09:13 PM
4

Remember that fish and bicycle quote. Tell them to go fuck themselves.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 03:39 AM
1

I think those teenage boys need to be taught that "going to school with" doesn't necessarily translate to "fucking". They can always date outside their school.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:15 PM
5

Demand for single sex colleges may increase if they offer more safety (real or perceived) than the co-ed ones. Also, what difference does single sex or co-ed make to the average student in fields like STEM or similar where most other students are already of the same gender as themselves anyway. I think they are a great idea.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 07:57 AM
4

Bicycles for Fishes? No.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 06:59 AM
2

Certainly.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 06:58 AM
6

Fuck off fishy. No bicycles for you.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 05:51 PM
35

I rarely drink around people I don't already know well. I also avoid different areas at different times of the day and always try to be aware of what's going on around me. Men take loads of precautions to keep themselves safe. We just don't complain about having to do so all the time, and no one will take those complaints seriously either if we did.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 04:07 PM
2

I don't understand. I don't get it. I just really don't. Lack of empathy.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:50 PM
1

Women are a lot more likely to be rude, mean, and almost... biting - in private, in public, and to each other. I really could not stand the way that women treated me as a woman - the catty attitude is a stereotype for a reason. I'm a guy and I always say that I learnt how to be condescending/callous to other people (only when I need to, of course) by observing women. Of course I'm not a natural at it, but it works sometimes and is a useful social tool.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:21 PM
9

it's really hard to understand why so many men still play along You get lonely and when a little positive attention comes along (rare as it is for an average guy), someone says a few nice things; you get taken in. Maybe start thinking that you won't end up chewed up and spat out like all the others.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 11:16 AM
6

Women are the ones who realize that having sex forced on you against your will is a terrible thing. Women are the ones who understand that being forced into parenthood should never happen to someone... and so on. I'd say far more men understand that in the case of male victims than women. They've just been conditioned to not say it out loud lest they be ridiculed.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:58 PM
2

If they serve women customers they also open themselves up to more crap about the wymzonz "not feeling safe" around male customers, males talking too loudly and intimidating them, dongle jokes, evil male barber being able to look down women's shirts, rapist barber culture, etc. You know, the usual victimry. It always follows the same pattern.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 03:30 AM
9

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1r65t8/time_for_another_dont_fall_for_that_shit_post/
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:47 AM
1

But while your hypothesis explains why feminists are suspicious of subcultures predominantly populated by (nerdy) men, it does not explain why they suddenly started to migrate to these places. Tech jobs started paying well and tech companies became some of the largest and most profitable in the world. And the nerd association with tech popularized other nerdy activities. As expected, many came looking for "their" piece of the pie and clashed with those already there.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 05:46 PM
1

From personal experience, I don't believe that gap can be bridged. Most people simply don't have any genuine empathy for males and their issues. But I think social shaming of those who are openly in favour of ill-treatment of males (pro child circumcision types, etc.) might work. If that sort of behaviour is adequately stigmatized, that should reduce some of the opposition we see against male issues.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:42 PM
2

They're spineless. They'll agree with it, lap it up and ask for more.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:18 PM
4

I'm a guy and I'm only like 5'6" 160lb and am pretty out of shape. What the hell am I supposed to do? You should be grateful for anything a wymbonz gives you. /s. P.s.: I'm 5'8" and whoever this cunt telling men to "take it" is can go eat shit.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:36 PM
5

Also, feminists are big on ideological purity. So, they are all like that because if they aren't, they're kicked out of the movement (see Erin Pizzey).
/r/MensRights28/07/14 04:58 PM
11

Niceness is wasted upon people who have no appreciation for it.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:28 AM
2

Women are free from their gender role, but men aren't. Men are still worthless deadbeats if they're not working full time. An unemployed female friend called me "lazy" just a few days ago, while out with me enjoying shopping and dinner at my expense. I work a 50+ hour a week job.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 01:20 PM
175

"I never believed that anyone would lie about rape. That was my stance: No one lies about this shit. It really made me have to adjust my entire view of people... I used to be like, Kill rapists!" It's a shame how so many men cannot empathize with other men. All it needed was for him to be able to imagine what it would be like were someone to falsely accuse him. But he didn't get it until it actually happened to him.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 03:53 PM
6

A few. And we are very grateful for them. Not as many as you'll find male feminists though. SRS is apparently mostly male and they are rabidly anti-male. Could be an indication of the general ability to empathize between the sexes.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:06 AM
24

Not just women involved in fights with other women. If you see a strange woman involved in anything that doesn't look good for her, don't try to play hero. Don't even stand back, or witness, or be a spectator or whatever. Just get the fuck out of there as fast as you can. A woman is in discomfort. You are a man in the vicinity. It will not end well for you.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:32 PM
1

Nope. "negging" is light teasing. This is just "be grateful I like you even when you aren't that attractive". Besides, that PUA stuff is to woo women, not men.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 04:40 AM
4

My wife told me I was lucky that she liked me despite my short stature. I'm 5'8". She's 5'3". We're of an ethnicity where the average male height is around 5'6".
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:50 PM
8

It was important to me that my psychiatrist be male when I consulted one for my depression.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:28 PM
2

Rationalwiki was long ago overrun by the freethought baboons.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 08:00 AM
-5

I'd prefer that they stay out of this sub. And away from boys and men in general. But I'm not a mod here or anything.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:33 PM
0

I've grew up in a socialist state. Socialism and feminism can have each other.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 05:02 PM
12

Because they simply don't care. Empathy for men and boys is a rare phenomenon and few are capable of it.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 09:50 AM
3

You seem confused. I talk to MRA posters here. Those who actually care about male disposability and educating the public That's pretty much everyone here. Including me. And I certainly don't want to "seriously discuss" male issues with someone whose views on them are popular with the againstmensrights crowd. I don't know what the other MRAs expect from a discussion with someone like you.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 06:22 PM
5

Well you can continue your "serious" treatment of the issues with those who talk to you then (i can't imagine them being much different from your friends on reddit), instead of trolling here.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:47 PM
5

But I really do apologize for thinking we could talk about how men destroy men's lives too for a few minutes. We could. But not with people like you.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:24 PM
5

so what's your point? To shift blame for everything bad that happens back to "men". The same reason why they insist that "patriarchy" is real and toxic masculinity and men can stop rape and men can stop violence against wymonz, etc.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:02 AM
9

That sub is a waste of time anyway. You can't "debate" male issues with people who have an ideological hatred of men. That's why that sub is going to end up like the good man project or that seriously what about the menz site.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:02 AM
1

I don't really care about "being seen as a threat" by some random woman. I'm much more concerned with what's going on around me so that I'm not surprised by muggers, drunks looking for a fight, or similar. Or if I'm in a taxi or mostly empty bus, what route the driver is taking. Things of that nature.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 09:55 AM
1

In India, if you are divorced and not rich (sometimes being rich doesn't help either) it is very difficult to find a partner. Maybe he doesn't want to be lonely.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 04:16 AM
3

It has been an eternal fantasy of feminists.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 05:38 AM
3

I don't have a term for it, but you know those women who suddenly act all nice in such an unconvincing way and it's obvious they want something. Their voice goes up in pitch, and that baby talk-ish manner of speech comes out. That.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 04:37 AM
2

Eh... from what I've observed the pressure to work out is pretty high among gay men and I've been told that some of the younger, more attractive guys have this expectation to be "taken care of" financially. So the grass doesn't really seem any greener. I'm straight though so not sure how accurate what I've learnt is.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 05:48 PM
5

I was groped by a guy in a public place. I had no idea what to do.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 04:09 PM
5

Gives people ammo to paint us as 'angry white guys.' I don't give a crap about what those people think. They are anti-male scum. They will try to paint us as such regardless of the presence of the simpler posts on this sub.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 02:09 PM
6

IMO it is more important to attract men's attention to issues concerning them than "not appearing petty" or whatever. And I think the simpler kinds of posts help.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 02:00 PM
17

News reports about women being violent towards males or a facebook screenshot of someone being a bigot towards males is a lot more impactful for new subscribers than a long, abstract and detached post about male issues. They are short, direct and illustrative. I think they are helpful more often than not in bringing in more subscribers.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 06:50 AM
3

All I was trying to say, is that she was not the sole cause of the event, she just planted the seed of it. Without that seed, he wouldn't have lost his job. Don't forget that she ended up fired too, but it makes sense as she worked in pr for the convention. Sendgrid didn't fire her for her actions. They were forced to fire her because they were getting DoS'ed.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 12:22 PM
15

He was fired because Richards manufactured the drama over his private conversation.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:58 AM
2

Has nothing to do with feminism. I'd call him naive if he were to do this at any institution made up mostly of women.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 04:31 PM
16

What a naive man...
/r/MensRights08/02/14 03:45 PM
2

These "student unions" are thoroughly infected by SJW ideology. What little concern the two who don't seem outright opposed to men's issues are showing will evaporate after they are elected. I wouldn't expect any change in the behaviour of these student unions regardless of what these candidates are parrotting.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 07:50 AM
2

I work in the tech industry and I actively avoid women at the workplace because I don't have the patience or inclination to change how I come across lest the wimminz "feel raped" or whatever. Coworkers (programmers/sysadmins/etc) often ask for help if they're stumped with some problem and if they are female I am almost always "busy". If they really need the help they have to get a male employee to seek it from me on their behalf.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 06:33 AM
6

Reason why I said this yesterday.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 04:34 AM
9

Lack of empathy towards men. I don't think most people will ever have it, so the best way is to stigmatize the ill treatment of men. So even when people don't possess any genuine empathy for men they'll hesitate to oppose men's issues because they "don't want to look like a bad person".
/r/MensRights06/02/14 05:26 AM
-6

OP is a troll. He posted this thread a few days ago. And "stemlogicuser" is a nickname nobody but a dumbass SJW would use.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 04:53 AM
1

I'm an Indian (and living in India) who dealt with this and married someone outside my community. Financial and social independence is what's most important. It will be very hard to resist that pressure to marry if he is dependent upon family or the community.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 06:04 AM
5

This is the one who is also in favour of sexually mutilating boys.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 05:07 AM
0

allowed themselves to be duped by the neoliberal elite Have feminists ever really gone against what the rich and powerful want? Even their interest in Marxism is only limited to trying to define women as a distinct oppressed class. They couldn't care less about the working classes.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 05:52 PM
2

The fact that this sub is encouraging this type of behavior is saddening and indicative of why the MR movement is looked down on and seen as a hive of misogyny and entitlement rather than a legitimate movement with valid complaints. lol. It will be "looked down upon" even if MRAs are conciliatory and apologetic towards people who are hostile to men's issues. Besides, what I said was from my own experience about men and empathy towards them. Perhaps a lot of others have had similar experiences an…
/r/MensRights02/02/14 07:46 PM
1

Well, I did in the last comment. I don't know why you're getting so worked up over it.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 07:21 PM
2

I was just stating an opinion. You needn't agree with it.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 07:06 PM
4

"Do you have any evidence that women would not be more inclined to start wars or are you just white knighting?"
/r/MensRights02/02/14 06:37 PM
40

If women ran the world there would be more wars because soldiers will still be overwhelmingly male, and it's easier to send people who you can't empathize with off to die.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:39 AM
3

Feminism. [See this sidebar post] (http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g2eme/feminists_tell_you_that_the_solution_to_mens/) for just a few examples of how it has always been hostile to men. You are free to disagree with me over the matter, however.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:54 AM
14

Because it is hostile towards boys and men.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 07:23 PM
1

It's more social dominance than work/money. Work and money are just the most obvious tools with which to work towards achieving that kind of social dominance. One of the reasons why I think social hierarchies will never go away. It's what women and people in general evaluate men by.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:09 PM
2

Males aren't really people, so they don't count
/r/MensRights29/01/14 09:22 AM
3

[Indeed] (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2044614/Sex-stormtroopers-How-French-women-fell-Nazi-invaders-Second-World-War.html).
/r/MensRights21/01/14 06:54 AM
2

OP, I question your motives you seem to me to have an anti-semitic streak, as well as trans-phobic views. It's one thing to be a traditionalist, it's another to be a hate monger. Could you throw up a pic of the posters or send one to the mods? New account. Bigotry. le ironic SJW username. I'm classing this as a troll until I see pictures of these posters the OP is talking about.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 03:59 PM
1

A college level campaign like that with posters everywhere? I'm sure they'll be aware of what's happening.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 03:32 PM
1

Ok, the "not related to MR" complaints really get on my nerves, but this really isn't a matter related to MR.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 03:18 PM
8

Whenever I see a woman being supportive of mens rights issues I get this warm feeling of witnessing another human being supporting something which doesn't directly affect them, but they want to do the right thing. Men are generally very grateful for empathy shown towards them because it is so hard to come by. Female MRAs are regarded very well in this sub. Contrast this with the "do you want a cookie for caring about women?" and "you can only be an ally, never a feminist" treatment male feminist…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 01:47 PM
11

Seriously, isn't expecting gay men to grope women kind of like expecting blind men to frequent strip clubs? Not to narcissists who think they're so hot that even gay men will be attracted to them.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:29 AM
3

This is exactly why I [often say] (http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ulw9y/why_women_arent_welcome_on_the_internet/cejfnym) that internet freedom is very vulnerable to these kinds of attacks from feminists and women in general. And that politicians will exploit this. It's only a matter of time before it is employed on a larger scale.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 02:18 PM
1

The patriarchy can never end at least not till all men are homeless for starters. It doesn't begin to end even then. In fact, all men being homeless means them being a burden on (i.e. oppressing) a female-run society. Despite what they tell you, for all practical purposes patriarchy means males. The only way to get rid of the patriarchy is to get rid of males. And that only gets rid of the patriarchy, not its lingering effects which can be said to exist even after it is gone.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 11:28 AM
1

Lack of empathy towards males.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 04:59 AM
2

Males aren't really people. So it makes sense. /s The other 30% are probably female children.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 05:01 AM
4

Feminism has always been an upper-class movement.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 06:38 PM
10

Remind me why nerd culture must not outright despise these political ideologues and those whom they represent?
/r/MensRights14/01/14 02:18 PM
10

They're not exactly what you would call 'high-brow' or 'progressive' themselves. Uh... Daily Life is a proudly female biased website with content tailored to women. Sounds like the kind of thing people who call themselves "progressive" are on board with. That they are railing against a university course for men fits too.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 11:47 AM
2

[Indian feminists] (http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/a-sad-day-for-male-rape-victims-in-india/). There isn't going to be any "rethinking".
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:43 PM
6

We're grateful for them. [Unlike some who would hijack similar efforts and harass those who started them] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erin_Pizzey#Overview).
/r/MensRights09/01/14 05:20 AM
2

Just remember that niceness is wasted upon those who have no appreciation for it.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:48 PM
4

It's not exactly going to hurt the MRM. I think MRAs should individually support gay rights and the MRM should encourage MRAs to do so. The movement itself must not try to hitch itself to gay rights. That reeks of appropriation and parasitism to me.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:42 PM
12

Nice. Donated a bit.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 04:55 PM
13

Having 10 women stand in line while one bathroom is empty... I don't want strange women who think we live in a "rape culture" anywhere around me while I have my dick out. Queue up, piss on the floor, I don't give a shit. Just stay out of the men's bathroom if you're a woman.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:46 AM
3

If women genuinely "feel threatened" by poorly worded anonymous insults on the net, then there really isn't any way other than tightly controlling and censoring the internet to make them "feel safe". How else do you make sure that their sensibilities are never offended in such a manner? Internet trolls aren't going to stop doing what they are unless made to. We have seen that policing is what it will take going by what a lot of women say over the 'net. Hence my remark about them being very suppo…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:19 AM
16

Women are going to be extremely useful allies in the political efforts to control, censor and defang the internet.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:55 AM
1

IMO that's because they know that men are empathetic.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 05:34 PM
2

Everyone "should". But its more reasonable to expect empathy from people similar to yourself. So I expect men to empathize with male issues more than I do women.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 12:37 PM
1

I'm not rich enough to afford a house big enough to accommodate a separate space like that.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 05:31 AM
18

To be honest, I don't expect women to care. But I hope that men learn to.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 05:02 AM
56

Male feminists are the lowest form of life.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:25 PM
2

I wasn't disagreeing with that. I was saying that it's not necessarily a BETTER plan to marry outside our culture, if you intend to live in our culture with your bride. Upbringing matters. Someone who is from a culture where divorce is discouraged is more likely to avoid it than someone who is from a divorce-happy one. Also, taking a bride from a poorer society makes it easier to fulfill the hypergamy requirement.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 04:16 PM
6

Linked article showing men being more charitable.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 11:40 AM
7

Men generally tend to have more empathy.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 11:01 AM
7

I'm Indian and I already do it. And I also picked a partner who didn't grow up in India.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 03:01 PM
1

We do? What's different between the way men and women "process" feelings? The only difference I am aware of is that men tend to suppress them, which isn't really healthy as the high rate of male suicides shows.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 08:12 PM
7

Also considering feminists' tendency towards ideological purity, NAFALT simply doesn't apply. They are all like that because if they weren't, they'd be excommunicated from the movement. So yes, it is hypocritical, even if two different feminists wrote them.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 07:11 PM
2

NBC's coverage of bikini-volleyball is a much bigger deal than some obscure website's coverage of some user-created fanfiction that 0% of the population has even seen. So whether something is right or wrong is decided by the attention it receives. Also its disgusting that you'd put beach volleyball on the same level as Snape/Harry noncon mpreg rapefics.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:45 PM
2

Yes, but non-MRA men visit this sub and have some of their misconceptions dispelled through these articles.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 05:59 AM
2

But it also counters the women are wonderful notion.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 05:50 AM
1

Parasitism at its finest.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 05:40 AM
7

why are several of the Jews I know or have known not in on the benefits? Jewish conspiracy hurts Jews too. Especially Jewish wymonz, who are among the primary victims of it.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 05:15 AM
13

Feminism is the radical notion that men are not people.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 05:05 AM
2

Maybe. But why is this way unacceptable to you?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:56 AM
1

Both men and women are capable of equal amounts of evil This is not the prevailing view in mainstream society.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:52 AM
0

It is needed to counter the influence of organized religion and religious groups on society and politics. For example, to oppose creationist clowns and their ilk trying to push religious dogma into science or history classes.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:27 PM
11

people will dominate, abuse and even kill people, if given the opportunity and some encouragement. People. Not men. So it's not something particular to "male instinct". And for every tyrant there have been thousands of ordinary men who were content with their lives and didn't have any such compulsion to dominate others or make grabs for power.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:43 PM
11

I certainly don't think domination and grasping for power are any kind of "male instincts". How about you provide some evidence that they are?
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:33 PM
12

Some of the comments are pretty stupid. Raising a nonviolent society….will never happen and never should. It goes against the male instinct to dominate and grasp for power. The weak ask, beg and demand for equality. The strong take what they want through strength. What? That's exactly what feminists think men are like.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:09 PM
3

Bullying between girls is also often not physical unlike in the case of men.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:20 AM
6

I think children can learn to deal with hurt feelings. It's harder to deal with being overpowered and thrashed.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:50 PM
27

Lots of men I know have been involved in physical altercations. I have a slightly misaligned joint and a chipped tooth due to being attacked. People who say that men have nothing to worry about in public have no capacity to empathize with men.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 04:51 PM
4

Sometimes they're the same. But a white knight needn't do it for sex, sometimes they are just guys with whom the "women are wonderful" effect is particularly strong. While a nice guy is generally someone naive who thinks people will like him if he is nice to them.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:38 PM
12

I haven't blamed men for all the world's problems anywhere in my original post It is the inevitable conclusion of feminist theory. All males have privilege. Their privilege is instrumental in denying women treatment that they would otherwise receive in an equal society. Thereby making every male complicit in the oppression of women. I want no part of that kind of guilt, and I resent being branded with it. If you are a feminist, to me, that's what you are doing. Peddling blame and guilt. I am not…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:31 AM
2

Probably because they spend inordinate amounts of time online. That is exactly the reason. They also have a bunch of IRC channels and many of them are heavily involved in the meta drama subs. For people who supposedly hate this site so much, they spend practically all their time here.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 09:55 AM
11

Offmychest was taken over by SRS types some time ago. There was a post on SRSSucks about it but I can't be cunted to find a link right now.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 09:21 AM
13

Criticism of feminism as a whole, coming from men, is a sore point. It feels like somebody from another country criticizing my country for all its human rights abuses. Then stop talking about men, villainizing them and heaping responsibility of all the world's problems upon men. Men criticize feminism because it is hostile to them. You could argue that it's best for me to abandon ship, but as a woman I feel this isn't an option for me. I'll be getting to this later. Nobody is asking you to jump …
/r/MensRights19/12/13 09:06 AM
1

From those who founded feminism. It didn't creep in at some point. It was inherent in the beliefs of those who founded feminism. For example, here is a novel written 100 years ago by a feminist that paints a society without men as a utopia. Hatred of men is what has always fuelled the movement. Misandry is inseparable from feminism.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:15 AM
4

Seriously? This may be why feminists don't care about men's issues. They don't care because their ideology says that males cannot have any legitimate social issues. Until they adhere to the ideology they will not consider the complaints of the MRM legitimate no matter how "nice" you are towards them. Trying to engage feminists is not only pointless but actively harmful to the MRM considering their view of men.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 11:53 AM
2

More wimminz in tech plz. /s
/r/MensRights16/12/13 08:44 AM
-4

There is all this "enormous pressure" to not fuck people before marriage too in India. Funny how they can disregard that pressure but then act like a victim with regard to another.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 08:17 AM
4

If the overview were written by an actual wymonz studies female professor or student (they wouldn't have the capability to actually create a working implementation), it'd be considered a laudable feminist work.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 06:09 AM
13

I wrote this comment a few days ago. That's what happens when a you can't empathize with others. Things you believe are bad for you (and others like you) are perfectly acceptable when they happen to others.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 05:51 PM
3

And yet it's really only since women and feminists started agitating about this that anyone even considered it a problem. I mean, what are you going to do? It's the internet. Are you going to track down every single person who tells you to go die in a fire and scold them? Try to make them feel guilty? Prosecute them? What? Or are you just going to accept that it's (part of) human nature, grow a thicker skin and carry on? This is actually something that really frightens me. Feminists are big on s…
/r/MensRights13/12/13 04:14 PM
14

Child abuse was being subsidized by government? wtf?
/r/MensRights11/12/13 07:04 PM
4

He can also show weakness, but only at certain times. When? I can't think of any cases where showing weakness might be acceptable.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 04:15 PM
24

"Sensitive" means sensitive to her issues. Not someone who is emotionally expressive.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 04:14 PM
17

Considering how little objection they have against female false accusers, it's hard for me to believe they'd have too many problems with making some false accusations of their own.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:08 PM
2

Oh for fucks sake. They think male is biological, they think masculinity is cultural, therefore when they say toxic masculinity, they aren't taking about male. And you know this how? They've [associated toxicity with biological masculinity before] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testosterone_poisoning). Do you have any proof that they are referring to cultural masculinity this time?
/r/MensRights11/12/13 01:24 PM
1

If you actually go a do research, you will find that the term applies to aspects of masculinity that are toxic. What aspect of being male is toxic? So for your claim to be true, they have constructed a elaborate cover, for the real meaning. It's hardly elaborate. Unless one is in denial about feminism's view of men, the meaning is plain to see.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 12:01 PM
2

Its an extraordinary claim to make. I don't agree. I think it is fairly self-evident from how feminists view men.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 11:47 AM
3

I'd say the proof is the nature of feminism as an ideology of hatred against men and the term being invented by feminists. If that's not sufficient proof for you, you are free to disagree with what I said.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 11:39 AM
3

A source with a feminist owning up to using those terms for that purpose?
/r/MensRights11/12/13 11:28 AM
2

I think we hear the term "toxic masculinity" and hear "all masculinity is toxic". There is a reason they used those words. To associate toxicity with masculinity.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 11:23 AM
2

There already exist laws to deal with violence between people.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 08:15 AM
2

Remaining calm and able to take reasonable action in the face of someone else's meltdown is emotional generosity. You are literally suppressing your own frustration so that the other person can lose their shit, or suppressing your own needs so that you can prioritize solving the problem expressed to you by another person's crying. This resonates with me especially today. I won't bore anyone with the details, but yeah.. a lot of the time that seems to be the only viable thing to do in most of my …
/r/MensRights11/12/13 08:12 AM
1

I am. It makes sense to legalize prostitution, and make it safer for customer and worker. From what I've seen, your opinion on the matter is shared by few feminists. Most want to criminalize solicitation.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 08:03 AM
1

I agree, but I'm not a feminist.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 07:19 AM
3

The sex-positive ones are also against "transactional sex" (except in the case of women's preference for someone rich) and while they are "for" the rights of sex workers, they still claim that solicitors of prostitutes and consumers of porn encourage human trafficking.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:18 AM
21

When a woman does it, it's the hardest job in the world that involves such great self-sacrifice on her part. It is deserving of praise and appreciation. When a man does it, he's a useless leech living off his wife and why would any woman want to be with someone "unambitious" like that?
/r/MensRights11/12/13 04:50 AM
4

I think men are generally more empathetic towards others.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 03:26 AM
-4

Ridiculing male issues.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:29 PM
3

What actually happens is, for the most part, women do what they do everywhere else... except here they post pictures and maybe rate a guy highly, and then wait for him to make the initial introduction message. Click.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 07:31 AM
22

You know that crap about "feminism is the notion that women are people"? It's projection because feminists don't see men as human beings. Since they think men are in power, they believe that that's how men think of them too. It's the same reason why they are against the same things for men that they wish for women. That's why the opposition to paternal surrender but not to a woman giving up a kid after birthing it. That's why a woman engaging in sexual acts with a non-consenting male is not cons…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 04:13 AM
-2

Her self-entitled attitude to be loved..? Yeah. Would you be okay with a guy claiming that he is entitled to love? Isn't that what the whole nice guy business is about? "You are not entitled to a relationship".
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:21 AM
2

Because someone else can do it for them so they don't have to.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 03:11 PM
3

No. Go away.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 10:34 AM
-1

Considering that in my experience, most women tend to have very little empathy for men, I'm convinced that a country run by women would be even more violent because the rulers wouldn't think twice about sending soldiers (who are overwhelmingly male) to war.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 10:16 AM
1

Yes, it is.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 11:23 AM
12

That is what that whole patriarchy theory is about. Women are oppressed because males have privilege over them. Every male has privilege. So just by his existence, every male is complicit in the oppression of women. One more male child born is one more person with privilege over women. The more males that exist, the greater the oppression against women. That's why you have a century worth of feminist porn about androcide and violence against men. All these are lauded as "feminist works". Hatred …
/r/MensRights01/12/13 03:09 PM
15

No reason to not give her a shirt and kevlar, but rather they went with the bikini. I've read a lot of comments from female gamers complaining about "unrealistic" female warrior/melee/soldier characters and how they always play waify mages and stuff in games because of that. Many even complained that Female Shepherd from Mass Effect was just another male character without proper ladylike animations. They looooooved trouser-less Isabella from Dragon Age because "slut and proud!!" despite her bein…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 08:42 PM
0

No.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 08:19 PM
-6

We welcome them with open arms. Not really. Those who can empathize with men are welcome. Those who are incapable of that would do well to fuck off.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 05:56 PM
8

I would be very put off by a character like that (one of the reasons why I could never play a Tomb Raider game) in a game I 'm playing, but why should anyone get to dictate how a game should be made? I hated those 2D platformer games when I was a kid. Missing a jump and having to start all over. But I didn't think to myself that someone should make games for me. I just entertained myself with something else.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 05:26 PM
27

Coloured hair is white privilege. /s
/r/MensRights30/11/13 05:19 PM
99

B...but.. that erases wymonz oppressions. Male and female gamers are not the same. Nevar forget that just like everything else, there is male privileged gaming and oppressed women's gaming. When a man buys and enjoys games he is perpetuating the patriarchy and when a wymyn does it, she is smashing the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 05:06 PM
8

"And she was not supposed to pay because the guy asked her out! Even though she accepted the date and shared whatever they did on the date!"
/r/MensRights30/11/13 07:22 AM
2

If someone is making himself miserable with his bluepill indoctrination am I allowed to share redpill theory? No. You are supposed to say childish stuff like "kill urself le MRA neckbeard nice guy shitlord le". /s Some idiot feminist did that when an MRA was talking about being suicidal. Then tried to backpedal after the suicidal guy never posted again.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 03:44 AM
19

learn a lot of mental tricks to stabilize my mood and keep the dark thoughts away. Those tricks I've learned have been invaluable and are applicable to other areas of my life. Already tried that. For more than a decade. Never worked and I was at the point of looking for deserted places to go disembowel myself in. There are cases where all that heroic willpower stuff doesn't work. But pills do. In my case they were completely ineffective for more than a year, but the constant barrage of them on m…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 05:12 PM
19

if you've found a way to battle through Pills did it for me, but I usually get downvoted when I suggest that.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 02:29 PM
2

No. But I have been on dating sites and men on them don't do things like this. While women will make these lists even if the site forbids them.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 10:20 AM
3

He can be an ally. No he cannot. This kind of parasitism is a very common feminist tactic. They feign concern for some of the issues and after being accepted, try to change the movement to push their own interests. They recently tried that with the skeptic movement as well. You are naive to expect goodwill towards men from an adherent of an ideology that is built upon the notion that men oppress women for their own benefit.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 05:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter