TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

silentthinker Archive

View 1 post and 70 comments by silentthinker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm sorry was I botogynistic?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:42 PM
2

Don't you talk bad about dear /u/rightsbot! He/She/It is a wonderful tool.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:52 AM
6

That is if both groups worked towards only that goal and did not do other stuff along the way. Ideologies do not change but people do. Feminist ideology agrees with MRM ideology perfectly.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 11:07 PM
3

The academia fails to notice the fact that the King's minister is pulling all the strings. All that the data sees is the king and his "power". The sly minister is actually the one with the power as he makes the king do what he wants.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 01:02 AM
2

True power is not determined solely by position. Power is also dependant on your choices. If a minority's best interests are being taken forward by a government (Way more than the majority's), the minority has more power even if the government is made up of people from the majority (ethnic group). I'm a guy. We care about the quality of your comments not your gender.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 12:53 AM
2

The only thing that made sense is that the students do know what they are getting into. I mean how can 18+ people not know what is happening.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 12:22 AM
3

Ada Lovelace wrote notes which have an algorithm for calculating Bernoulli numbers using Charles Babbage's analytical engine and code that looks like a computer program. She is considered to be the first computer programmer.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 12:03 AM
-1

Lol nice try.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 09:38 PM
-1

I suggest correcting a simple mistake. Do you believe that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities? Yes Yes, you are egalitarian and you may be a feminist.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 12:37 PM
1

Yeah, I know why the rightsbot exists. It is there so that there is evidence of posts if they started out misogynistic and suddenly changed to Rainbow Monkeys or Mother Teresa. Basically I joke, I joke, I kid, I kid.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 05:16 AM
-2

O rightsbot, do you keep appearing here because it is Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 09:14 PM
1

Hmm... yeah. I wrote my reply wrong. I agree with you.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:56 PM
5

Go away rightsbot. It's creepy how you turn up in every self post.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:06 PM
2

Lol I'm going to comment on the copy - like it or not.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 03:44 PM
1

Odd how Unfit parents come together and create children and yet fit people have to worry about their kids.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:21 AM
1

No, the sports, quizzes, entrance exams are all ways to compete. Race car driving is a way to compete.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 09:29 AM
1

Yes, the stereotype is that boys in general are better at math than girls which is not true. The averages among boys and girls is almost the same. The fact is, the super bright among boys are much larger in number and are more super bright than the super bright girls. If more women are entering the super bright and they are more than 1/3, then it probably means that they are getting affirmative action which they do not deserve. As long as they remain at one third, it means that people respect ab…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:46 AM
1

Well then sorry for assuming. I meant at the time it happened.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 07:13 AM
1

You didn't get it. Larger number of boys are super bright at maths than girls. Which is a partial explanation of why many big mathematicians and nobel prize winners are males.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 07:12 AM
9

Ah, I see. However, I must say that that is not the judiciary's job. Changing the system however will still be a pretty sexist thing to do unless you do so for the fathers imprisoned too. That is what is so unacceptable about it.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 11:55 PM
1

We think rationally but to those in pain it is bot easy to decide.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 11:50 PM
2

When I meant endowed, I meant in the gifted children. There is a gender difference when it comes to intelligence. While girls' intelligence is spread across a narrower range, boys' intelligence is spread across a larger range. This is why you see a larger number of dolts among boys and you see less dolts but also less super bright among girls. While the less numbers of dolts do not create news, the nobel prize winners do. This
/r/MensRights30/10/13 11:49 PM
3

It's a pathetic idea. Edit: I am not against women, women's rights or misogynistic. I just feel there were way better ways to show actual misogyny.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 11:32 PM
1

A decade ago people would be like: Hmm... that's good when I said I am gay today. I won't try that again.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:54 PM
1

Something is filling boardrooms with men. Don't you think half the population i.e. the women also vote?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:49 PM
2

You must be pretty confused! Should you want your mother to do more jail time as a human or should you accept it and be happy that you have your mother back so quick.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:26 PM
3

So many children will grow better this way! Isn't it much needed women's activism? /s
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:12 PM
10

Needless damage to children Do you mean to say that women are better at taking care of children? But dear, this goes against the fact that feminism says gender identity is not determined by sex. So, according to feminism, men are equal to women when it comes to rearing children.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:06 PM
1

No one said all behaviour can be boiled down to innate traits. People only said gender specific behaviour is influenced by sex. However, feminism tries very hard to say that gender is a social construction which is anti-intellectual and nonscientific.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:53 PM
0

Girls may not biologically opposed to doing math, but guys are biologically endowed to math. I'm not saying that we can't have equality however.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:41 PM
2

It is funny how in one breath you say gender identity is socially constructed and in the next you say it is both biologically and socially determined.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:36 PM
1

Oh really? Then care to tell us how FGM is so traumatizing? Men deal with stuff or at least that's what society tells them to do. So, how is FGM so bad that it cannot be compared to MGM?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 08:47 PM
1

You mean how they were basically not given what they wanted right away? Why this statement? At least the didn't get punishment for crimes committed during the struggle was a bit alright. Although sometimes in a movement, some violence is required to gain the upper hand. Second part however, was good.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 12:06 AM
2

Look I may have made a mistake by commenting what I said on this comment of yours instead of the previous comment of yours. But, what I think is most important is that you please do not consider MRM a backlash. Even if it was, under a disguise, it has evolved into something much better. I have done my fair share of reading on what feminism is and I have seen my fair share of radical and average feminists. Many are good, but some are horrible. I also know that you gave data in that comment howeve…
/r/MensRights28/10/13 11:56 PM
1

A bunch of people ranting and fuming on baseless or semi-baseless shit is just not worth your time. Read the comments if you want to see idiots. Some of the men are also wrong, but most have a good sense of right and wrong.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 11:36 PM
5

You are excellent at derailing conversations. Don't conflate the past long gone with the now. Just because those anti-suffragette movement happened when a group of men retaliated, doesn't mean that MRM is also a retaliation movement against Feminism. Its not. It is an egalitarian movement. However, it may be a movement part of which is against Feminists but not Feminism. This is because some of them are not only getting rid of privilege of a certain section of society but adding on it further an…
/r/MensRights28/10/13 10:37 PM
4

You know if you tried this sort of thing like retaliating against feminism in /r/feminism, you would get a warning to keep discussions on topic or stop antagonizing. Then you would be banned for a fixed amount of time. MensRights doesn't do that unless it is spam or advertising or extremely rude. Need I say more?
/r/MensRights28/10/13 10:13 PM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights28/10/13 10:07 PM
0

Thanks for explaining that so well. But as a pro choice, I still have a problem with a woman ending the baby just before birth. Even though these two are contradictory, I think that the best way to go about it would be a mix of the two. I guess No one is completely pro choice or completely pro life. In my case I would give more importance to pro choice at least until two months to delivery. If it isn't aborted by then, I expect that the decision is to give birth as the pregnant woman would have …
/r/MensRights28/10/13 09:25 PM
1

I would like to know what FTFY stands for. I also misread your comment a bit. But yeah I believe resisting a popular movement is more difficult than just letting it go.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 09:11 PM
2

First of all, I'm being kind by downvoting with an explanation. You are wrong to think that he meant that Bijan's burning was low punishment. He meant: say Tom (random guy) were to have a collection of pics of children and the police found him, then the punishment would be low. I think that you want to say "Why punish paedophiles not acting on it at all" but, punishment is a way of learning. Punishment helps people learn what is wrong. Now, you might say nothing is wrong with not acting on it bu…
/r/MensRights28/10/13 08:39 PM
-2

Feminism is advocating for equality and does not want sexism or oppression to exist. Its ideologies do not want to justify misandry/oppression of males because of male dominance of the past. Yours is a perfect example of why mrm is antifeminist but not antifeminism. Edit: You are is changed to Yours is.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 07:28 PM
1

Even if you meant to be sarcastic, you have made a bad statement. If you are a feminist in disguise, then you are not being a good feminist.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 07:20 PM
1

Also don't panic if you find some clumpy weird tube like thingy on each testicle.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 07:08 PM
9

Why don't you use /s? & Downvotes showed how many people who didn't get the sarcasm have a good sense of morals in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 06:57 PM
2

I know this is ethically incorrect, but the only way that that rumours spreader will get true punishment is if he/she also burns and gets the same treatment. Living with that? Yeah right like that is anywhere close to the problems Bijan faced.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 06:52 PM
2

Please read his comment again. What he means by "punishment" is legal punishment i.e. the punishment he would have gotten by court case if police had found such pics on his storage devices. You clearly misunderstood.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 06:46 PM
2

Yes his future friend aren't going to miss him, nothing wrong with that but, the baby's current friends are two-father and mother. So, if none of them wants it, then there will be no one missing the baby. Believe me you would not have even met that kid so there wouldn't have been anything to miss and you're life would be totally fine. Heck you wouldn't even think of the aborted child after a few months/very few years. However, agenderAsexual already has friends so, it is a big difference.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 10:44 AM
0

Also, to those pro life religious people, Can't raise the child into a good/nice human being? Don't have it.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 10:33 AM
1

I try to stay very composed and think rationally but this just makes me very angry.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 10:24 AM
0

Wow you really are a skeptical idealist! I'm also pro choice, but if there should be or there is any law(s) of when a child in the womb is alive (Maybe third semester) and its right to live should outweigh right to choice, then I guess feminists will end up arguing that those who put up that law and those abiding and supporting that law are misogynistic. They will never see it in the way of ethics at least not most of them. Edit: When I said "you really are a skeptical idealist", I meant that it…
/r/MensRights28/10/13 10:16 AM
1

Why don't you try this question on ChangeMyView (CMV)?
/r/MensRights28/10/13 10:09 AM
1

Do idiots know they're idiots?
/r/MensRights28/10/13 06:12 AM
2

Yeah, it is kinda a hit piece.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 07:10 AM
2

If you wish people, you can comment on the original article I don't have any problem. I just felt it was worth discussing.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:10 AM
2

Rightly put!
/r/MensRights23/10/13 08:57 PM
1

That is so sexist! Whoever told you that is CERTAINLY not a feminist because it turns out they hate sexism. /s
/r/MensRights21/10/13 06:13 PM
3

Yes, our brains interpret everything. We see colours not because they actually exist but because our brain interprets those light frequencies captured by our retina as colours. We don't know how much is made up by our brain and how much we sense is reality. We don't know if our sense organs are faulty or by how much. Heck, what we consider as logic might just be gibberish.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 06:07 PM
3

It was Not part of Japanese culture that "women and children first". All people were equally important and priority was given to save those people who would be the best to save in Japanese Culture. Read the whole thing. It was actually Western culture influence.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 10:28 PM
1

Do this please asker! I don't understand how they can even say such things. Are they trying to make men feminine?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 10:13 PM
1

That can be done but, firstly, people especially feminist/radicals will see you as promoting "misogyny" not freedom of speech. Secondly, the pages/groups are removed and we cannot tell Facebook to put them back and tell everyone to join the group again. That's just Idiotic. So, we're left with one option i.e. Equality when doing any shit.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:42 AM
2

I agree, why censor at all? But, when censoring, equality must be maintained.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:27 AM
3

In no case does correlation imply causation.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 07:54 AM
1

And moreover, the most damaging aspect of rape is from the social stigma. Society's treatment of rape victims causes more damage than the act itself (Unless of course the crime was more than just a rape). If other people showed more sympathy and compassion to the victims, then rape wouldn't be so bad to live with. A large number of women are also responsible for making the victim feel as bad as they do. Feminists should make a note of that.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:30 AM
1

Oh! My! I have become serious now, haven't I? Haha. Thanks.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:13 AM
2

USA! he said it in the self text!
/r/MensRights24/09/13 09:51 PM
2

I know many men are like that. But we aren't here to talk about that. We want the laws to be fixed.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:24 PM
1

I agree with stick766's part about telling her. Although I too feel it would be pretty much useless.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 03:52 PM
2

The first part made sense, "Is this movement going to be about justice or about petty gender warfare?" Doesn't make any sense. I mean the sentence is useless and has got nothing to do with Men's Rights. MRA is about equality by means of achieving men's rights. Anyone who is doing petty gender warfare is not welcome here.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 03:51 PM
3

Is it not possible that the entire study was carefully done so that they get "good" results that would make it easy to publicize and sensationalize the report? (Possibly to get good money)
/r/MensRights20/09/13 03:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter