TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sillymod Archive

View 56 posts and 5,122 comments by sillymod on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
338

sillymod/r/MensRights31/10/14 10:28 AM
247

Men's Rights Newssillymod/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:48 PM
234

sillymod/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:24 PM
227

sillymod/r/MensRights14/09/13 03:09 AM
220

sillymod/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:16 AM
214

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:58 AM
212

Feminismsillymod/r/MensRights28/09/16 03:03 PM
202

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights04/02/16 12:28 AM
196

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:54 PM
180

sillymod/r/MensRights05/01/14 06:10 PM
131

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:35 PM
127

sillymod/r/MensRights13/12/13 03:01 PM
116

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights07/08/16 05:36 AM
113

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights27/06/14 03:26 PM
80

GOAL REACHED!sillymod/r/MensRights03/01/17 05:43 PM
78

Generalsillymod/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:51 PM
71

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights18/11/16 10:38 PM
65

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights03/07/15 03:15 PM
64

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:52 PM
63

sillymod/r/MensRights24/06/13 11:49 AM
62

sillymod/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:28 PM
59

sillymod/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:18 AM
58

sillymod/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:09 PM
54

sillymod/r/MensRights09/05/13 05:49 PM
52

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights19/08/14 09:21 PM
52

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights15/01/15 05:56 PM
49

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights13/07/15 03:11 PM
47

sillymod/r/MensRights17/12/13 10:31 PM
43

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights12/05/16 12:38 AM
41

sillymod/r/MensRights23/11/14 12:09 PM
40

sillymod/r/MensRights04/10/13 04:51 PM
36

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights18/08/16 01:52 AM
35

Action Op.sillymod/r/MensRights18/03/15 11:23 PM
33

sillymod/r/MensRights11/02/14 07:58 PM
31

sillymod/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:40 PM
31

sillymod/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:45 PM
30

sillymod/r/MensRights06/10/13 10:18 PM
28

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights16/04/14 10:39 PM
28

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights17/02/17 03:30 PM
26

sillymod/r/MensRights21/09/16 02:52 AM
26

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights12/09/16 03:11 PM
25

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights10/12/14 04:03 PM
23

sillymod/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:47 PM
22

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights02/12/15 07:27 PM
16

Social Issuessillymod/r/MensRights07/07/15 08:07 PM
16

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights11/02/15 10:27 PM
13

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights21/08/16 03:37 AM
12

sillymod/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:07 PM
10

sillymod/r/MensRights24/10/16 02:39 PM
10

Questionssillymod/r/MensRights12/08/15 01:28 PM
6

sillymod/r/MensRights28/05/16 03:29 PM
3

sillymod/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:34 PM
3

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:41 PM
2

sillymod/r/MensRights25/06/13 10:32 PM
1

Moderatorsillymod/r/MensRights10/01/16 04:19 PM
0

sillymod/r/MensRights27/10/16 02:10 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 5,122 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

There are starving people in Africa. If only your concern for starving people in Africa was as strong as your concern about what people post on the internet. If only you used your wit and internet-warrior-effort to spotlight crimes against all of humanity, and not just a select, privileged few. Then the world would be a better place.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:29 PM
–

If you have a point to make, use a self post and include the link.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 06:54 PM
1

Talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:28 PM
6

Congratulations - you have stumbled upon the concept of hyperagency and hypoagency. Those are terms you may want to look up to explore your idea more. (No sarcasm here. It is awesome when people individually and independently develop the same idea. It suggests a level of truth to the idea.)
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:25 PM
1

Stop trying to get authority to fight your battles for you. Just because you don't understand biology, doesn't mean you can report that someone is "harassing" you because you don't like what they say. Get an education so that you can learn how to argue from reason.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 02:27 PM
3

The problem is not with the OP, but with the article on the site. The title is copied directly.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 04:45 AM
1

The Trump issue is fueling the alt right so that they are very vocal, but they are not a majority. If you only involve yourself in groups of homogenous types of people, you won't ever create any change, nor be open to any change.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 03:11 AM
1

Why would I ban you? That would be silly. You can post to MensRightsMeta and we can discuss it, though.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 09:45 PM
1

Take it as a statement that you decided not to follow the posting policy of the subreddit.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 09:33 PM
1

/r/Drama and other subs exist to discuss issues about subreddit drama.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:52 PM
1

Try /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:51 PM
0

Women behaving badly posts? Come on. Grow up man. Clearly you are sensitive about one particular issue, and you feel the righteous desire to proselytize about it. But you need to take a step back and understand the system.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 07:52 PM
3

Right. It isn't. One is a penis, one is a vagina. Clearly they are different procedures. But that is completely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:18 PM
7

Its horseshoe political theory. The SJW side of the left has an analog on the right. Conservative extremists dominate the far right, and are all about imposing moral doctrine on others. Same thing. Maybe we could label them "Moral Justice Warriors".
/r/MensRights18/02/17 05:49 PM
3

/u/atheist4thecause This is how you make a post about child sex abuse linked to men's rights.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 05:45 PM
3

Damn it, I came here to say that!
/r/MensRights18/02/17 05:40 PM
2

Use the report button.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 02:57 PM
1

Press the report button.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 02:56 PM
2

It is nuanced. a) It is possible we missed one. b) These are typically the softer rules, in that if a post gets a sufficient amount of discussion before we catch it, we tend to leave it so as not to hide or stifle that discussion. Basically, the comment section becomes the relevant piece of information. c) The generally agreed upon relevant topics to men's rights are not universally agreed upon. Many people believe that women behaving badly posts are not relevant, many other (majority of others)…
/r/MensRights18/02/17 01:51 AM
2

No, we remove them regularly. It sometimes takes a few hours for someone to notice them, but they get removed.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 01:04 AM
1

They used to be called "self posts"... I guess they are called text posts now?
/r/MensRights18/02/17 01:04 AM
–

Spam/Off-Topic posts will be removed. Use self-posts for related topics, justifying their relation. If the ONLY thing about gender is in the title that you choose, then the post/link itself is only tangentially related to men's rights. In such cases, use self posts.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 03:27 PM
–

There is nothing in here about boys.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 03:22 PM
1

Horseshoe political theory. The far-everything is doing a lot of narrative building these days. I appreciate facts, or rather I appreciate the effort to make things more factual. It is very difficult to figure out what is a fact.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 12:45 PM
1

It happens. Not common or normal.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 11:49 PM
1

You were reported for the AMR discussion.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 04:42 PM
2

Instead, you got reported. Clearly you are from AMR, but you are engaging the person in debate/discourse. I see no reason to remove your posts or ban you simply because you believe differently.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 02:50 PM
1

The general perception is that men commit domestic violence and women protect themselves from domestic abusers. This is clearly an issue showing the reverse.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:32 PM
3

This is about pedophilia, specifically targeting boys. It isn't trying to make any statement about politics or any other unsupported claim. You don't seem to understand what "evidence" and "supported argument" is. You are trying to make pizzagate a real thing by pointing to other situations. Is there pedophilia going on? Are people being abused? Yes. We can all agree that is happening. But you can't make a claim about it happening by people without supporting evidence. You want to take about a s…
/r/MensRights14/02/17 10:24 AM
2

Pedophilia exists. No one is denying that. Pizzagate is about political leaders involved in a pedophile ring. You haven't provided evidence of that. You have just posted about non-political leaders and then used that to associate with political leaders. If you agree with that reasoning/logic, then let me tell you a story about how Trump is going to nuke the whole world. For proof, let me tell you about the threats that North Korean leaders have made. If you don't believe me, let me use a message…
/r/MensRights14/02/17 07:27 AM
–

Lack of evidence does not mean false. This post has been removed as propaganda.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 07:09 AM
–

Take it to /r/conspiracy.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 07:06 AM
–

The behaviour of fetishists is not relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 03:02 PM
–

There is a subreddit that matches your title. Please post appropriate material there.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 03:39 PM
2

For faculty positions, women are preferred over men: http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/2015/10/new-study-explores-gender-bias-academic-hiring Furthermore, the authors acknowledge remaining barriers to women for gaining entry into academic STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) fields. But, they wrote, once women succeed in completing doctorates and applying for faculty positions, hiring is biased in their favor, as shown by real-world hiring audits as well as experimental evid…
/r/MensRights12/02/17 03:37 PM
1

Their plan is to have this new filter replace the existing filter eventually. So eventually this would affect us making /r/all.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 03:31 PM
1

A man was hit with a baton with his pants down and it caused damage to his anal region. The description in this article does not indicate he was raped. Being beaten in the genital region is damaging, but it is assault not rape.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 03:30 PM
1

Please read our posting policy.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 04:30 AM
–

I have removed this for being misleading. If you only get your information from the title of an article, then you are an idiot.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 02:22 AM
1

This contains personal information. This can't be posted on our subreddit until vetted by a media source, as per Reddit rules.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 05:49 AM
7

What you are saying is that we should filter the posts so that Reddit doesn't have to. The end result is the same - some people get silenced.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 02:07 AM
6

What you are saying is that we should filter the posts so that Reddit doesn't have to. The end result is the same - some people get silenced.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 02:06 AM
6

Its funny, because that is the argument of how Patriarchy still exists despite laws demanding equality.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 10:41 PM
–

Just because you add something about Men's Rights in the title, doesn't mean the issue is about men's rights. If you want to post marginally relevant material, you need to use a self post and justify why it is relevant. This is merely a pro-Trump post.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:12 PM
-68

Take this as your warning. If you want to insult this subreddit as a whole, and the existence of the MRM, you will have to find another subreddit to do it on.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:11 PM
3

The behaviour of many of the people here definitely doesn't help.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 03:23 PM
1

Have since before I was a mod.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 09:56 AM
0

When we have rules about racism, that is your problem.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 09:34 AM
2

You really need to use /s when you are being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:24 AM
12

Maybe if people didn't use "cucks" as a pejorative here, among other more appropriate behaviours that could be had, we wouldn't have this problem... Never-the-less, we won't start censoring people for behaving that way. We won't let them win. We don't break any rules, and we seem to flourish. So they have to try to find some other way to push us down within the rules that they create.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 03:28 AM
1

Ah, okay. Misunderstanding.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 07:15 PM
1

It isn't okay if anyone does it. /r/MensRights is one of the most anti-doxxing subreddits. We take a stronger stance on it than Reddit does itself, including banning people for promoting the idea. So good try. But no, you are wrong. Edit: There was a misunderstanding.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 06:09 PM
–

/r/MensRights is not a race sub. Take this bullshit elsewhere.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 05:36 PM
1

We had an issue like this on /r/MensRights. We now have a moderator with the top slot that is owned by a ghost - someone not on the moderator team, and who doesn't use the account for anything except as a backup. No one knows who it is anymore, specifically so that no moderator can be coerced to give up the information. Even if people managed to figure out and dox every single one of the active moderators, that account could still prevent anyone from taking control of the subreddit. So yeah... I…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 05:32 PM
1

She is no longer running for president. Her effect on men is done.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 05:27 PM
7

So... 34h working for women, plus 4.5h domestic work = 38.5h. Men are expected to work 47h plus half the domestic, so 2h let's say. 49h working for men, 38.5h working for women. Equality.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 05:23 PM
1

I have a question - why are you arguing with yourself on Reddit? Seriously, you are running multiple accounts and having a conversation with yourself. Are you trying to use this subreddit for advertisement again? I am this close to banning you. Foregen has been spamming and trying to use "viral" marketing on Reddit for years. Generate research capital the regular way, don't prey on people on social media.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 02:27 AM
–

Trump related news goes in /r/Politics or /r/The_Donald.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 03:59 PM
–

There is no reason to use an archive site to post this. Please post the regular link.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 02:59 PM
2

If that were the motivation, then there would be an effort for boys to be better represented in any field that they aren't. There isn't. This has nothing to do with representation in the fields, that is simply the PR campaign. This is entirely about generating business, and boys put up with being treated like shit while girls don't.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 05:43 AM
–

Contribute to the existing discussion on this topic rather than reposting.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 08:43 PM
–

Please use /r/MensRightsMeta for discussions such as this.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 08:16 PM
1

Likely our sticky mod saw the title and went by that.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 03:02 PM
1

Please resubmit this as a link post.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 02:19 PM
-9

I disagree with your assessment of the term use differences.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 07:24 AM
-12

Remember, nazi name calling occurs in this subreddit, too. Feminazi ring a bell?
/r/MensRights05/02/17 06:48 AM
1

Don't forget this one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12710831 Please post these on /r/MensRightsLinks!
/r/MensRights05/02/17 12:44 AM
1

I fully support your point, but does the graph? The graph shows preventable deaths rather than specifically heart disease and stroke.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 07:08 PM
1

This was recently submitted. Please contribute to that discussion rather than reposting.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 07:02 PM
4

If you are here to make false accusations, you will find your welcome rescinded.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 06:43 PM
2

This talks about right vs left politics. This isn't about men's rights.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 11:37 PM
–

Please follow our rules for cross posts.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 11:34 PM
3

Here's the difference: YOU get to keep insulting me/us, posting here, etc. The proof of freedom of speech is right there. Every single right winger that you would accept being a mod has voted for censorship in the past. The "left", as you denigrate, would be silenced. That isn't pro-free speech, that is anti-free speech. The mod team is set up as it is in order to protect people's voices. The end result is that yes - this sub is kept topically consistent. There are very clearly pro-Trump message…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 01:48 PM
9

Except that I clearly said that they need to support other people's right to speak as much as their own? So any request for censorship will be ignored. I am outright saying "No, we won't censor." My post is aimed more at readers than at the OP.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:33 AM
30

There are lots of liberals here. Really, the only requirement is that you support other people's right to speak as much as you want them to support yours - even if you dislike their opinion.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 12:08 AM
1

You don't get to refute a source simply because it supports an idea with which you disagree.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 08:48 PM
1

Good. I think a lot of the issues that lead to the rise of Trump are linked to how people aren't able to share their opinion in public. Thus, the only way to do it is to rebel against the status quo when your opinion is sheltered by the voting system. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of pro-Trump individuals recognize the problems with Trump, but don't see a better alternative given their frustrations with current society. If people were allowed to discuss non-PC issues rather than being attacke…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 11:01 PM
1

I wouldn't confuse "the pro-Trump people are very loud" with "the pro-Trump people dominate". This subreddit is not pro-Trump. This subreddit is relatively neutral, but allows all view points to discuss. Combine that with how sensitive anti-Trumpers are to pro-Trump messages, and you have the appearance of pro-Trump to anyone who wishes to see it that way.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 06:27 PM
–

This isn't "Race Rights". Fuck off with this shit.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 11:23 AM
1

Talk to a lawyer. This is a legal issue, as enforcing a dress code at work can lead to lawsuits. Do not take the advice of random people on the internet.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 09:56 PM
1

Contact a lawyer. This subreddit doesn't have experts in these issues and is not prepared to provide you with legal advice.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 09:55 PM
3

Then sue Reddit. Good luck to ya.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 01:07 AM
4

Ah, we have a keyboard lawyer here! I am shaking in my boots are your failure to recognize THE ENTIRE EXISTENCE OF REDDIT IS BASED ON REPOSTING THINGS.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 11:23 PM
2

No, they don't. But good try.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 11:23 PM
6

I understand that. I address this - the originating author doesn't get to control it once it is posted.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:33 PM
–

Many people are reporting this post, clearly brigading from the originating source. I understand that the original poster did not want their post pasted in this subreddit, but they don't get to control that. /u/InBaggingArea has clearly stated that this story did not happen to him/her, which is sufficient for us. If you don't like a story being posted on the internet, don't post your story on the internet.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 03:33 PM
1

Not really sure how this relates to the sub.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 02:33 AM
1

This sub has a large contingent of Trump supporters. However, those Trump supporters are so fervent in their support that they can't tell when an issue is and isn't related to Trump. If Trump does something related to men's rights, then that is fine to discuss here. But simply discussing his existence or behaviour is irrelevant and will be removed. The same thing would happen if someone posted something Paul Elam said/did that had nothing to do with men's rights. Or Karen Straughan. Or any other…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 01:28 AM
1

Sorry. I did miss that point. On a re-read, I see now the word choice that I missed before. I am getting a lot of anti-MRM flack today because of trolls posting unrelated shit.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:27 PM
0

We aren't. Stop associating the behaviour of trolls with the larger population. FFS, that is the exact kind of divisive bullshit that Trump and other demagogues use to divide their opposition. Get a fucking grip.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:39 PM
1

We didn't. Trump trolls are all over reddit right now.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 07:38 PM
1

Hey Imnot, that site has some real problems. Can you find another source?
/r/MensRights21/01/17 05:45 PM
5

I was reading some feminist literature the other day, and I paid close attention to the wording. The wording started out with the premise "if traits are social constructs" and then continued to argue the rest. However, throughout the rest of the writing, the premise was taken as fact. So I think their argument starts with an unscientific "if" and then forgets that they started there. It is a philosophical argument that is taken far too literally.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 06:07 PM
1

Due to doxxing concerns with emails, we don't want people sharing emails on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 03:31 PM
1

Talk to a lawyer. We are not experts in any of these things.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 10:34 PM
1

Not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 11:12 PM
1

Remember that random people responding to you may have no actual credibility. You are going to fuck this all up if you don't bother to vet people's credentials.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 02:45 PM
–

To quote AloysiusC elsewhere in this thread: I should mention that this person has outright said to us in the modmail that he does not agree with us but reckons we should believe him when he says he's going to try and be objective. I wanted to make this a sticky so it is very visible.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 02:39 PM
–

This is an example of artificial outrage. This is a women's clothing group. They don't have men's clothes, so they aren't selectively biased against men.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 03:57 PM
–

/r/MensRants
/r/MensRights16/01/17 06:11 PM
3

That is a silly comment. The suit has a maximum amount of 50k. It won't be a big impact on their income. This is about making a statement, not about bankrupting/punishing.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 04:39 AM
1

Break up with her. There, this issue is resolved.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 03:34 PM
–

This is about race, not gender.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 06:44 PM
–

Welcome to the other 20 posts on this issue. Contribute to existing discussions before posting yet another rehash of a recent issue.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 06:44 PM
1

Show current instances of feminists thinking this way. This isn't a good argument to make because it is easily disregarded.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 10:37 PM
0

I agree that there is a lot of evidence for that. So let's focus on current evidence.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 08:40 PM
1

There are 300M homeless people? That being said, the homelessness issue is more about the "sleeping rough" homeless. https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/may/07/men-gender-divide-feminism
/r/MensRights12/01/17 07:19 PM
1

But they don't say that one gender is more responsible than the other. They aren't advocating gender inequality. The application of the rules may be that way, but we need THAT kind of evidence to prove it.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 06:36 PM
5

Those are great posts. Let's get upset over those situations. Let's not get as upset over posters from 2008 that aren't in circulation anymore. (Can still get upset if you want, but not as upset, maybe?)
/r/MensRights12/01/17 06:31 PM
2

This is controversial. But people who think that this is new/current are incorrect. Let's be precise in our issues, and not resort to manipulations of reality as the feminists do.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 06:30 PM
-3

I agree that the stories we share on this subreddit suggest that this is exactly how the laws are implemented. However, this poster isn't current. People can be outraged at the laws, and can be outraged at how men are treated. But they should be clear about what this poster means and where it comes from. For example, if I disagree with someone and pull out, as proof of my claim, some data that is old/debunked/whatever - that doesn't mean my point of view is wrong, but it does mean that I am maki…
/r/MensRights12/01/17 06:30 PM
0

I didn't say it was photoshopped. I said the controversy isn't what people think it is. The school recognizes that it was a poorly worded thing, and this isn't a current controversy as people seem to think. This is resolved.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 06:27 PM
–

Use a little Google-Fu people. This isn't the controversy that you think it is. http://www.dailydot.com/irl/anti-rape-poster-reddit-conversations/
/r/MensRights12/01/17 04:25 PM
–

This is not a politics sub. There are subs devoted to this type of material.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 02:17 PM
–

This is irrelevant to this sub. Take it to /r/The_Donald or something.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 01:35 AM
–

This is about race and feminism, and has nothing to do with men at all.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 05:13 PM
1

Hello new account. Unfortunately, you are asking for advice from non-legal-professionals about a matter that is legal in nature. We can't offer advice. More than that, you have provided details which are not verifiable, so we have no idea whether you are telling the truth or not. I am not asking you to submit things to verify your story, I am telling you that people can't offer you sound advice if they have no idea what aspects are true. Due to your account being new, this post was flagged by th…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:44 PM
–

This self-post has no content. Please repost with content.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 02:42 PM
6

This was reported as having nothing to do with Men's Rights. As a person who tried watching the movie and saw males constantly portrayed as idiots and villains and horrible people, I disagree. This movie is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:33 PM
2

If that is your response, then you are clearly missing my point.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 06:54 PM
10

Violent crime != homicide. There are many more types of violent crimes than that. That being said, efforts to protect women have resulted in a drastic sentencing and punishment gap, such that women are not punished for their violence. In addition, women are more likely to use proxy violence, where they maneuver an agent to act on their behalf (a male, generally). An example of the denial of female violence is discussed here: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/caught-between-parents/201203/dome…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:30 PM
1

Sounds good.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 02:59 PM
1

Politics issues belong in other subs.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 12:57 AM
0

Take it to /r/The_Donald.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 04:58 PM
8

I watched the videos and read all the stuff surrounding that situation. Your view of it is drastically different than mine.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 01:25 PM
2

Still not even remotely misogyny. It is a hatred of the marriage industry/system at best.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 01:24 PM
6

This is more about making a statement about the issues. How the hell do you think change is made?
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:10 AM
2

How is that misogyny? Why is EVERYTHING (caps because I am being hyperbolic) remotely related to animosity towards a woman or a situation that involves a woman suddenly misogyny?
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:08 AM
89

Not to diminish your experience, but it is sad that the most effective arguments against unfair child support and alimony come from the "second wives club" and women who are paying it in those rare cases.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 05:35 PM
5

Exactly! No more abortions! No more adoption! This is what feminists want! Equal rights, right?
/r/MensRights01/01/17 04:35 PM
5

Right. Women shouldn't have sex if they aren't ready to be a parent. Totally reasonable feminist perspective to have. They should keep it in their pants.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 04:35 PM
2

I am pro choice as well! That is why women shouldn't be able to give their children up for adoption! Poor women who feel oppressed because they have to take care of a child they created. ROFL.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 04:34 PM
1

Yes. Most women do. That is how we socialize them. We tell them they are special, they can do anything, etc. And then there is a rude awakening when they are treated like everyone else in the workplace. Suddenly it becomes misogyny.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 02:38 PM
3

A lot of what you experienced is what men experience. Men are just used to it because they get it throughout their lives. When women don't receive their privileges/special treatment, they feel like they are being discriminated against and call it misogynistic. "Check your privilege" applies...
/r/MensRights01/01/17 02:34 PM
0

While I might agree with you, this subreddit was almost shut down a few years ago over a similar situation. We are held to a different standard than the rest of reddit, due to our non-feminist views. As a result, we have had to crack down hard on these situations because the admins treat us differently.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 04:25 PM
-1

Your post contains personal information - specifically the names of individuals who are not deceased. If you remove that information, I will reinstate your post.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 03:00 PM
-1

This post contains personal information (names of non-deceased people). I removed it. If the OP wants to edit their post, we can put it back.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 02:59 PM
–

We don't allow people to fabricate arguments here. Either make a reasoned, rational argument or don't bother. This post has been removed.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 08:45 PM
–

While this post has received significant attention, I have removed it. All you have posted is a picture of someone, along with a name. This is not sufficient to warrant a post. If you want to claim that someone has done something, you need to link to an article or other valid news source. Otherwise it looks like a witch-hunt claim, which is against the global reddit rules.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 01:13 PM
1

If you continue to post like that, you will be banned. Take that as your only warning.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 10:45 AM
3

Actually, its a "look, a woman did something bad and didn't get the 'help'/punishment deserved because women aren't treated with agency. Then she reoffended, unsurprisingly. Men are treated as acting with malice, and punished accordingly, while people pretend that women are simply victims of their circumstances. This is the result."
/r/MensRights27/12/16 12:21 AM
3

Actually, its a "look, a woman did something bad and didn't get the 'help'/punishment deserved because women aren't treated with agency. Then she reoffended, unsurprisingly. Men are treated as acting with malice, and punished accordingly, while people pretend that women are simply victims of their circumstances. This is the result."
/r/MensRights27/12/16 12:21 AM
5

This subreddit discusses topics involved in gender related to the men's rights movement. Men are regularly treated as having hyperagency - responsible for their own actions and the actions of others because they are acting agents, while women are treated with hypoagency - not as responsible for their actions because they are not acting agents. For equality between the genders, BOTH of these issues must be resolved - women need to be responsible for their actions, and men need to be responsible f…
/r/MensRights26/12/16 11:20 PM
6

I wasn't implying that you were a feminist. I was showing you that the discussion being had is valuable both to the MRM and to feminists, meaning that it is distinctly a significant portion of the gender debates. You might not like it, but others do. Allowing people to have a discussion that THEY WANT but you don't is an important part of growing up. Time to get on that, dude (or dudette, I don't care).
/r/MensRights26/12/16 09:43 PM
7

We don't remove some things in order to generate discussion. In this case, the relevance of the OP's post is that men get "Don't be that guy" shit all the time and yet women don't get anything similar yet still have instances of behaving badly. If you want to take a feminist perspective, you can say that women need to be allowed and recognized for their bad behaviour in order to have full agency.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 07:44 PM
6

I just wanted to point out that your comment was reported. Here is the report text: 1: ban this cunt That's hilarious.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 06:29 PM
2

Only if you are a social justice warrior.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 09:34 PM
8

This subreddit doesn't allow for personal information to be shown. So no, next time DON'T show the name. Unless you want the post to be removed, and/or your account banned, that is.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 04:10 PM
–

Since you are deciding to ignore anything said here and fabricate things, then you can't be seen as anything other than a troll. Goodbye.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 08:27 PM
1

Trolls aren't welcome here.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 04:42 PM
1

People are currently reporting this post. My favourite so far is this: "This guy is a fucking pedophile. If you dont want to burn in hell, you will IP ban him from your sit [sic]" (I have no way of IP banning, much less from my sit.) We (the moderators) do not support pedophilia. We do not support child abuse. But this post discusses the issues surrounding child and teen sex only. Discussions are acceptable on this subreddit, even if they aren't politically correct. This discussion is different …
/r/MensRights22/12/16 01:27 PM
–

Not the right sub. This post has been removed. If you fail to follow the rules, posts get removed. If you can't handle that, don't be on Reddit.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 12:29 PM
2

There is a HUGE push on this subreddit right now for the Alt-Right position, and a white-supremacy position. We are seeing a huge surge in race, race-baiting, and other racially charged posts. We have made it very clear that this is a sub about men's rights, not white rights or any other race issue. Because of this surge, we are taking a bit of a harder line approach to posts that want to try to conflate men's rights with racism issues. People can view that as corruption all they want. The fact …
/r/MensRights22/12/16 12:29 PM
1

Admins run all of reddit. Mods run individual subreddits. This was removed by mods, but not by me. I am making a post a few up from here about it if you want to read.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 12:26 PM
1

Under your definition, female circumcision is not genital mutilation either, then. So you should be supportive of that in order to be inconsistent. If you aren't, then you must face the fact that you have an intrinsic difference in your views of men and women based on their gender rather than their humanity.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 12:20 PM
2

"I have no information, but I want to get recreationally outraged at something based on an unfounded assumption I made because I am actually angry about my own life and want to take it out on other people." The sub won't miss you, but I hope you resolve your personal issues and can approach life from a less angry perspective. It isn't good for your health.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 10:02 PM
1

Report trolls, we will look at them. People who insult us, have different opinions, or otherwise disagree with the general sentiment here are not trolls.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 10:01 PM
1

Please read our policy about personal information.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 07:40 PM
1

You gotta learn how to reap that sweet, sweet comment karma, man. I am rolling in it this Christmas!
/r/MensRights19/12/16 07:11 PM
1

Yes, actually. My internal guideline is about 30-50 comments. We get that from our 130k subscribers pretty easily. It really depends on the severity of the rule breaking, though. These are part of the highly subjective aspects of moderating.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:29 PM
1

Yeah. I am pretty sure you were the one who originally hit "Ignore Reports". I just took the credit for it by making the post. :)
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:27 PM
1

Actually, we are pretty good about things normally. This time of season, everyone is busy. The difference is that we each kind of have our "thing" that we moderate. This is one of the things I focus on. Theothermod focuses on stickies, for example.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:25 PM
93

6: <no reason> 4: Threatening, harassing, or inciting violence 1: how to be a contrarian asshat 1: Safe space shaming 1: Cry more sexists 1: cuck 1: Post about bannings by other moderators 1: This isnt mens rights 1: #2 1: MAGA!!!! 1: We should stop focusing on women and focus on men's rights instead. 1: I thought "banned from" posts were against the rules? 1: you absolute do have a right to feel safe assholes 1: Threatens, harasses, or bullies 1: I'm male and you are all fucking idiots 1: No po…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:46 AM
–

This kind of post is normally removed as it violates our subreddit policies. However, I have been travelling and didn't see it. At this point, with the number of participants and comments, removing it would also have a detrimental effect to that valuable discussion. As a result, I will be leaving this up. Those who continue to report it won't be satisfied with the response.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:24 AM
2

Because you didn't read the rules of the subreddit.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 05:14 AM
–

And I finally got around to removing this post.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 12:23 AM
–

Please read our rules before posting. I have removed this.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 03:01 PM
1

I assumed nothing. I understand moderating very well, and have done it for many years. My argument stands.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 12:15 AM
–

Please read our rules before posting.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:32 PM
0

Agreed. Really poor post by the OP. They could have done much better. That will likely be reflected in the votes they receive.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:28 PM
13

I agreed with you are first, but others have made a good point... this happens to men all the time. There are even women blogging about doing it.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:21 PM
1

Is it also impossible to read our rules before posting?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 06:19 AM
41

Stop making things up. https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/blog/2014/04/why-do-male-nurses-get-paid-more When you fabricate issues, you make yourself look like an idiot.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 04:52 AM
–

Please see our rules about cross posting. I have removed this post.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 08:44 PM
–

This doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 03:24 AM
1

Why are you asking if you are able to press charges to someone who is harassing you? Call the police. Talk to a lawyer. This is the internet, not legal professionals.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 01:45 AM
–

Nothing but comments on 4chan say rape. More than that, personal information is posted. This is ridiculous. I have removed it and reported the OP to the admins.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 06:16 PM
1

You didn't post a link. I have removed this.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 06:11 PM
–

As this has hit the front page of reddit, there is the usual outcry. There are many reports of this article, of which I have chosen to hit "ignore reports". Keep in mind that the POINT of this post is to illustrate that sex with underage boys vs girls is treated very differently in society. Feel free to argue about the poor choice of words in the title of the post by the OP, who is likely being provocative in order to elicit a response/outcry from people. It is click-baity. Never-the-less, the p…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 06:51 PM
1

Can you post these in /r/MensRightsLinks? That is where we post all the links to studies we want to reference later.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:01 PM
4

Yup. Appears to be working.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 12:39 AM
3

One or more of the links you have in your comment are triggering the "permaspam" filter. I am unable to approve your post. I recommend reposting the comment, but using a link shortener or something to disguise the links - maybe even the archiver.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 09:41 PM
–

Please read our subreddit rules before posting. This post has been removed.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 02:45 PM
8

Non-feminist politicians gave women their rights. Not feminists. The fact of the matter is that non-feminists can support equal rights just fine. It is called Egalitarianism, and it has been around a long time.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:41 PM
9

Good response you have when you don't have a reasonable comeback. Men are constantly told if they don't want to have kids, they shouldn't have sex. I don't have much sympathy for women who are told the same. I strongly believe in abortion rights. But I am not so hypocritical that I actually want to treat men and women differently, as you do.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:39 PM
15

Around the world, men are asked to give up their lives for their country, and the protection of the women. Not just as soldiers, but as firefighters, police, security, etc. Both genders have shitty deals. Selectively focusing on just one gives you feminism.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:38 PM
2

Circular argument. You assumed your conclusion from the start.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:36 PM
17

The issue is that men need to be free to show their emotions in their own way. That includes getting together with other guys, blowing off steam, etc in classical male fraternity.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 01:54 PM
–

This has nothing to do with this subreddit. Continuing to knowingly post irrelevant material will result in a ban.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 05:50 PM
2

You can't post both a link and a text. Try resubmitting.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 02:45 PM
–

This post has been removed. You are showing a pattern of willfully ignoring subreddit rules. Basically, you are a troll - and a bad one at that.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:38 PM
1

That bastard.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:14 PM
–

np.reddit.com links please. Sorry to be a nag, but we hate being accused of brigading.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:18 PM
47

I came here to use those words "fantastic video". I completely agree. We have a black person, who demographically is worse off than white women, debating rationally and reasonably against a white feminist. Does race matter? Not in the arguments, but the racial arguments give the people speaking voice. A while male would be immediately disregarded based on his race combined with his gender. But because the male is black, his voice will be given more merit to the public. It is sad that race and ge…
/r/MensRights29/11/16 05:56 PM
1

Being the loudest yeller isn't "debate".
/r/MensRights29/11/16 04:02 PM
–

/r/MensRants is the rant sub.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 04:00 PM
-1

You call me divisive and yet I am inclusive - it is you who wants to exclude. You say so yourself. You tell me I am "victim signalling" and yet I don't claim to be a victim - you are the one who claims to be a victim of feminism. You tell me that I am taking my hatred out on the world, and yet you are the one who uses hate filled language, who clearly shows hatred for others and for their beliefs. I was pretty clear about how I don't hate others. Instead, I prefer to understand them. That allows…
/r/MensRights28/11/16 04:14 AM
0

Good for you. You now have more reason to think you are better than other people. Not that you needed one, your ego is already pretty big. If it makes you feel any better, I don't think you are rotten to the core either. I am not so closed minded that I don't try to understand ideas with which I disagree. I prefer to be non-ideological in my views. It is more difficult to take that approach, because I don't get to find comfort in my hatred of people with opposing points of view. But such is life…
/r/MensRights27/11/16 04:07 PM
2

People can submit links to that sub, so long as they are np.reddit.com links.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 05:26 AM
2

I think you understand my point better than the other people here.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 01:42 PM
3

I agree that it isn't common here. But I can't say that it doesn't exist. That's the thing. The article is talking about turning a blind eye to its existence. I won't do that. But I am not saying that it is common or prevalent. Just simply that it exists.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 03:35 AM
10

And yet we attribute the hurt and wounded women (who HAVE been raped and abused, etc etc) to feminism? That would be pretty hypocritical. We can't have it both ways. Either we each have to embrace our dark sides and deal with it (something the MRM, for the most part, does better than feminism), or claims "nope, that isn't a TRUE feminist/MRA!"
/r/MensRights25/11/16 10:49 PM
1

Many of its fundamental premises are "bad", but it is difficult to say "false" to something that is an opinion. But since it is an opinion, a lot of it is based on perspective. This makes it neither rotten nor not rotten.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 10:48 PM
1

Who said that feminism is rotten to the core? That would be a pretty ridiculous thing to assert.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 09:13 PM
10

We have rules about violence. We have rules about racism. Both of those exist within the MRM. We created these rules to deal with the dark side of the MRM. For the most part, I do my best to understand it. Generally people come to this subreddit because they are full of anger and frustration at the way their life is going. Maybe they haven't seen their kids in months; maybe they have barely enough money to live despite working their ass off because of child support/alimony; maybe they were arres…
/r/MensRights25/11/16 09:11 PM
2

No one said it was rotten to the core. That wasn't even part of the conversation.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 09:01 PM
5

As a moderator of this subreddit, I am quite well aware of the dark side of the MRM.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 08:32 PM
1

Seems to be pretty fair and balanced.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 06:47 PM
1

There are plenty of other subreddits devoted to this. This isn't an issue of men's rights. It is disconcerting that the admins might be doing this, though.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 05:31 AM
3

Yes, I have removed this post for this reason.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 03:25 PM
–

I have removed this post. The term Lugenpresse is completely unnecessary in the title. I will not have this subreddit manipulated to serve the alt-right vs liberal fight that is going on in the US, nor will I see this sub manipulated by feminists to make it appear to be a "hate sub" as they claim it is.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 03:25 PM
3

You wouldn't be saying that if Hillary had won and I was doing the same thing then. The issue is that the conservatives go overboard on posting irrelevant material because they proselytize so much.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:51 PM
1

Yes, politics and men's rights have a relationship. That is why I very clearly said that any political post that has to do with men's rights is perfectly fine. If it is about Trump or Hillary or the election or any other topic, no matter what side it is for, if it has to do with men's rights also then it is welcome here. And if it isn't obvious that there is a relationship to men's rights, then people can make a self post to include their link and argue the relationship to men's rights. This isn…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 04:36 PM
8

No one is unbiased. I don't really care who you agree with. There are clearly pro-Trump messages and clearly pro-conservative messages on the front page. We aren't removing things for their political stance. The proof is there, and if you choose to ignore it then you are shining a beacon to the rest of the subreddit that you are ideologically driven just as those you fight most against.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 01:56 PM
4

You mean that election that already happened over a week ago?
/r/MensRights20/11/16 03:31 PM
–

For those who are reporting this. I approved it specifically so that you all have an opportunity to explain why the OP is wrong in their assertions about feminism. We don't remove posts here based on the person's point of view/opinion. We use our words to argue against them if we disagree.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 08:01 AM
–

Did you bother to read the sticky post about political threads? No? Well, the consequences are that your post was removed.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 02:27 AM
1

I talk to lots of feminists. My workplace has a poster in the break room saying, "Friends don't let friends be sexist." and showing two guys standing there.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 12:27 AM
1

I was trying to take their perspective seriously for a moment.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 10:25 PM
3

If it has to do with men's rights, then it is relevant here. Why is this so hard to understand? If it is simply about Trump or Hillary, then it belongs on a political subreddit. If it is about how Trump or Hillary influence, are influenced by, etc gender issues, then it is relevant here. I don't care about left/right bullshit. It just has to be related to men's rights.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 05:25 PM
11

Not even remotely what I said. There is lots of pro-Trump posted here so long as it has to do with men's rights. Take a look at the front page and it will be clear. You have to be willingly blind or ideologically driven to see otherwise.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 03:55 PM
1

Women claim that our patriarchal society doesn't take sexual assault on women seriously enough. Well, men learn from how women treat men with regards to sexual assault. Maybe if women and feminism took sexual assault on men more seriously, we might be more inclined to do the reverse?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 02:15 PM
2

To people reporting this for being political and not related to men's rights: This is related to men's rights because the accusation is that, in part, Hillary wasn't elected because of her gender. This is an accusation against men and society for being sexist and patriarchal. An alternative explanation for her loss shows that men aren't to blame, and that this can't be used to further the anti-male feminist agenda.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 03:24 PM
–

This is about politics and race, not men's rights.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 09:01 PM
0

Try /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 05:29 PM
1

This is being reported by tabloids. If you can confirm it, then it will be postable. Right now this is rumour with no evidence. And we don't approve of false accusations here.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 01:36 PM
0

This isn't about men's rights. Whether or not the genders are binary or non-binary doesn't affect whether men should have the same rights in our society as women.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 08:28 PM
1

DougDante has been around for a very long time. He isn't inherently a white nationalist, but maybe he found something interesting in a particular article that he wanted to share. If you have moderation concerns, please send the moderators a message.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 02:48 PM
–

Please review the subreddit rules when posting. This post have been removed.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 04:00 AM
–

This is about race, not gender. Find a different subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 02:06 PM
–

This is a sub about men's rights, not politics. I have removed this post.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 03:50 PM
–

This is political, not about men's rights.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 03:47 PM
2

This is interesting and her speech is well written. A view of history helps place context to the modern issues.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 06:50 PM
1

This is not relevant to this subreddit. It has been removed.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 06:30 PM
4

Post something like that again and you will be banned from this subreddit. Alternatively, I can just forward a link to the admins and they will perma-ban your account from all subreddits.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 08:38 PM
6

It is a technical term. Funny enough, I found out about the term on Reddit in a very interesting discussion years and years ago...
/r/MensRights10/11/16 01:57 AM
82

Mansplaining is not about being raised with privilege in a patriarchal society. It is about thought-terminating cliches. It is a manipulative argument tactic to shut you down so that your position is not heard. Congratulations on your transition. I hope that these aren't common occurrences for you, but I will warn you that they are more common than you would like. Equality is a noble goal. But abusing the push for equality in a power trip is what has happened.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 12:22 AM
1

And you got your post removed from this subreddit for this post. Basically, you seem to have an issue with reading the rules of the subreddit before posting. That isn't an issue with r/feminism, that is an issue with you.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 12:17 AM
5

I agree with you. You should take that position. There are a lot of idiots who don't take that position. I look at the comments in this thread as an example. Every group has their idiots, their ideologues, their fervorous. Sometimes we just have to let them have their speech, try to educate them with reason, and ignore those who refuse it.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 04:20 PM
7

Isn't that the woozle effect or something? We blame feminists for doing that, and here we are doing it ourselves. It is possible it was a false accusation, but it is also possible that the DailyMail is full of shit as they often are.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 03:04 PM
1

Other news articles suggest the boy forced himself on her.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 07:41 PM
–

I have removed this post. It is behind a paywall, which makes it impossible to verify. Other news sources suggest the boy raped the girl. Despite the ages involved, it is still possible for a minor to rape an adult. Sex without consent doesn't know age. If you want to post this story, you would need to find an article that actually justifies and supports the idea that the boy was being wronged.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 04:28 PM
–

Do you want to have your posts removed? Because posting memes is how you get your posts removed. Read the subreddit posting policy first, next time.
/r/MensRights07/11/16 04:12 AM
–

Nothing in the email you linked to says that Hillary covered it up. You can't make things up - you need to assert with proof if you are going to claim things.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 11:05 PM
–

This gets posted over and over, is debunked over and over. If you aren't willing to use the search feature, that is your own issue.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 06:20 AM
-1

Except, of course, for Trumps comments on the use of nukes? Other things include his horrific fiscal policy, disastrous health care policy, etc. You can shut your eyes and plug your ears, but Trump is a child and doesn't belong in power. I hate Hillary, but Trump is worse. The US faces a giant douche vs turd sandwich choice.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 11:58 PM
1

Yes. I did. On purpose. To illustrate a point.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 10:06 PM
–

Please see our rules about cross posting. I have removed this post.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 07:41 PM
-1

The number of men harmed by that is fewer than the number of men who will be harmed by Trump. Lesser of two evils. Except that if it is a male doing the harm (Trump), then we don't have the same PR ability about anti-maleness of society/government. Hillary in power is a win for men's rights in the long run, even if it is a short term loss. Lose the battle to win the war.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 05:27 PM
14

40 Reasons not to vote for Trump: http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2016/02/27/40-reasons-not-to-vote-for-donald-trump-n2125585 The Men's Rights issue comes down to this: Hillary has a history of doing and saying things that show that she is aligned with a feminist view of the world. That is bad for men. But Trump would throw the world into chaos and potentially lead to world wars and other things that would result in such a large loss of life and wellbeing for men that it trumps (pun i…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 03:11 PM
–

Please read our rules before posting. I have removed this for failing to follow our cross posting policy.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 12:44 PM
1

Rules of subreddits are posted in sidebars. I have removed your post because you violated one of our rules. I recommend that you read the rules before posting to prevent your posts from being removed.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 03:56 AM
–

Please read the subreddit rules before posting.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 02:45 AM
–

Rants belong in /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 02:45 AM
–

This post has been removed due to the highly editorialized title. If you want to manipulate people's views, you can do that on a different subreddit.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:15 PM
–

People have reported this post for being transphobic. I disagree that this is transphobic, but it does suggest that the OP does not have a clear understanding of the reasons for transitioning. At worst, it is trans-ignorant. Never-the-less, the discussion here is valuable, and so I am leaving the post up. I take objection to people applying words like misogyny, transphobic, homophobic, etc, when there is no intent for hatred/fear. Never ascribe malicious intent to human behaviour that can be exp…
/r/MensRights02/11/16 09:44 PM
–

Please follow our rules when posting to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 04:37 PM
–

Broken link. I removed it. Feel free to resubmit with a working link!
/r/MensRights01/11/16 02:55 PM
2

Hey Pierce. Long time no see! How have you been?
/r/MensRights01/11/16 02:54 PM
-3

I pull my cat's tail all the time and it doesn't scratch. Clearly you don't understand how intellectual discourse goes.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 07:35 PM
-6

[Citation needed] The whole thing. Citation needed for the whole thing. This is just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 03:18 PM
9

Equal rights is different from complimentary contributions. There should be equal rights, and that doesn't have to interfere with the rest. Most men will agree that men make better soldiers in war. The difference is that they shouldn't be forced or pressured into it, such as with selective service. There is no reason why your partnership with whatever male partner (I get the impression you are heterosexual) you find can't have complimentary contributions. He protects you from intruders, reaches …
/r/MensRights29/10/16 03:17 PM
2

What they propose is sarcastic.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 07:46 AM
–

There was no sexual assault, no evidence shows that she touched his genitals. This is a highly editorialized title. What he did was be no different than a woman pepper spraying a man for touching her arm.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 01:07 AM
1

"Its other people who are patronizing, not me!" Look in a mirror when you call other people patronizing. "You might learn something."
/r/MensRights25/10/16 07:34 PM
–

Your title is blatantly false. I have removed this due to a strongly misleading title.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 01:13 PM
6

You have the ratio inverted, dude.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 04:34 AM
-4

8% oversampling doesn't mean the entire poll is wrong. It just limits the scope of its application. All polling is a SAMPLING of the population. There are statistical tests to determine how representative of the population that sample is. Having an 8% fluctuation of political leanings is not an excessive problem. A single sample does not determine anything. Multiple samplings, multiple polls, multiple similar results - that is the thing that tells us that, regardless of singular failings of poll…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 10:02 PM
12

The evidence goes either way, depending on which study you read. Some studies say that circumcision helps prevent against AIDs. There is a lot of criticism that these studies were paid to find that conclusion, and that their statistical analysis is severely flowed. Some studies say that there is a strong link between ADHD, Autism spectrum, and circumcision. The argument is that the trauma at such a young age in development induces a lasting psychological effect in some children who are susceptib…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 07:36 PM
5

So fight SJWs by becoming an SJW? As a moderator, I can appreciate and understand the admins approach. It is a "turn the other cheek". Fighting this kind of behaviour with oppressive control just fuels it. The only thing that calms it is actions that show that their behaviour is ineffective. If you show them that you won't stop just because they doxx you, then their doxxing was a waste of their time. THAT is how you get them to stop. We have this issue here. Some people hate on the moderators an…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:53 PM
-2

"I can't be on the losing team, so its the POLLS that are wrong!" Ah huh. Cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:46 PM
7

Clinging to a few thousand year old religion, despite modern knowledge, is the ridiculous part. You have no right to dictate YOUR beliefs on us either. So I don't give one flying shit if you are tired of the genital mutilation discussion. Adhering to a set of beliefs formed when humans didn't know what an atom was, how the human body worked, how genetics worked... Seriously, who is fucked up?
/r/MensRights22/10/16 03:03 PM
–

This is not relevant to this sub. Pretty sure you know that.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 02:50 PM
1

The video is a purely political issue. The only relevance to the subreddit is in the title. This would be a situation where it needs to be a self-post to justify its relevance to men's rights. How are men's rights affected by this?
/r/MensRights21/10/16 05:42 PM
1

Use Google. It is called Egalitarianism. By the way, rants belong in /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:54 PM
1

You aren't an adult. You need to get your parents to deal with this.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:53 PM
1

This is a spambot reposting it. We are happy with the content, we just don't want spambots to win. Please repost it yourself!
/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:51 PM
2

This is a spam bot posting. Please repost it yourself so that the spam bots don't win! We want the content, but we don't want bots to be the ones posting it.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:49 PM
1

You may wish to speak to a lawyer or other professional. People on this subreddit are not knowledgable about the individual custody laws in various regions of North America.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:48 PM
–

This isn't relevant here. If Milo is racist, then deal with it on a sub that is about race issues. If the Alt-Right is racist, deal with it on a sub that is about race issues. This sub is about men's issues. It is unfortunate that so many liberals/left-leaning people reject men's issues, leaving a higher than normal concentration of right-leaning people as interested parties. Maybe if the left didn't have a stick up their asses while trying to bow down to women, there wouldn't be such an issue.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 04:42 PM
2

Once again, you get reported because people don't stop to understand what you are trying to say. For people reporting this post, please try to understand that TPA is not saying that feminists "love to be raped" (maybe some have rape fantasies). He is saying, first and foremost, and feminists are fascinated by the topic of rape. For whatever reason, rape is a crucial thing to them, just like homosexuality is to priests. There is a connotation that goes with that connection/comparison, and that is…
/r/MensRights18/10/16 04:52 PM
1

I disagree. If someone put it up specifically to convey the message about gender, then it wouldn't matter if it was taoist or not. As you said - it is mostly accurate, but not fully accurate. Thus, it is possible that accurate portrayal of Taoism was not the purpose.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 12:35 PM
3

This is a good explanation of part of it. For this to be acceptable, under this explanation, then 1. all of the words on the male and female side would have to be associated with those sides in Taoism, 2. a Taoist art piece would have to be appropriate for the location.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 11:43 PM
1

Ah, sorry. I was responding from my mail. I thought you were the OP.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 08:08 PM
1

Yes, there are lots of problems with these kinds of statistics. If you combined data, it is difficult to describe the commonalities between them. This is no different than the shit that has been pulled on men for years by feminist organizations. Does that mean it is okay for us to do the same in return? No. But I am not making a big fuss about it personally because it is mildly fun to watch feminists get a taste of their own medicine.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 07:22 PM
1

I have a life and other responsibilities. This is a volunteer job. I am not required to give a long explanation. If you can't be bothered to read the rules, why should I be bothered to give you a long explanation?
/r/MensRights17/10/16 01:28 PM
2

You ask "are these people right or wrong" and yet multiple claims are made. To what are you referring? They are right that they use a different definition of rape. But if you require that a person is penetrated in order for them to be raped, then it is completely irrelevant to talk about rape as a gendered issue. Men aren't concerned with that kind of rape unless we talk about prison rape, since it is so rare. If we are concerned with HARM, however, the harm done by having sex without the intent…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 01:27 PM
2

This is a meta topic, as you know. This isn't a meta sub. There is a small number of people focusing on Trump stuff. It isn't dominating the subreddit. People are allowed their own views, and you can use your WORDS to argue against them. This sub is not universally Trump supporters. You need to stop letting a few vocal people influence you.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 01:10 PM
1

This is a meta topic. This isn't the right sub for this.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 05:10 AM
1

Dating choices is not something that either men or women are discriminated against on. This isn't a relevant rights issue.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 05:55 PM
8

You aren't going to get anywhere here. This is going to be a pro-Trump circle jerk, and we just have to let the pro-Trumpers get it out of their system.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 09:27 AM
-2

While I understand the situation laid out in the article, I feel like this can't be the whole story. So the guy had NO IDEA that Sarah Jackson was a porn actress? (FYI, I had no idea Sarah Jackson was a porn actress, so that is believable.) But the female grad student AND the prof both knew that Sarah Jackson was a porn actress? How and why do they both (independently?) know that Sarah Jackson is a porn actress? Sure, it is possible that the prof and the grad student both independently watch por…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 09:55 PM
3

I have approved this post - this is as much about gender as it is about race, thus it is relevant here.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 06:11 PM
1

I agree with you. Never-the-less, I have memories of fights with the admins, and this was the solution we came to. We either self censor these kinds of things, or the admins use it as the excuse they need to impose their views on reddit. We lost one moderator because of the fight - permanently banned because he dared to argue about the issue with an admin.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 09:54 PM
–

You are posting email information, which would be viewed as trying to generate a witch hunt by the reddit admins. I have removed this for that reason. I encourage you to repost it with the email information removed.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 08:09 PM
1

The Archive Bot didn't backup comments. So it wouldn't have helped. I can see the comment, since I was the one who removed it. The problem is that these trolls feed on responses. So when people engage the trolls, it increases the trolling. The best solution is to ignore them. But some people just love drama and so they engage the trolls regardless, meaning that we have to remove the posts. I would love to be able to leave the troll messages up for everyone to see (how ridiculous they are). But s…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:36 PM
2

Sure. Reporting works well. Also, publicly denouncing bullshit helps prevent against malignment by feminists.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 03:38 AM
5

It definitely is not (just) feminist trolls. I have noticed 2-3 distinct trolling efforts. If they are the work of a single person/group, then it is pretty structured. If not, then it is as I said - several groups are trying to alter the dialogue here for their purposes. I have seen pro-Trump extremist trolling (posting things so ridiculous in support of Trump that it could only be the work of a troll). I have seen pro-rape extremist trolling (similarly, things so ridiculously in support of rape…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 06:05 PM
9

We are taking steps, but by stating them then the spammers will know what we are doing and find ways around it. It is the unfortunate nature of moderating - when you tell people what you are doing so that they have greater trust in the authority, you make it easier for people to circumvent that authority. Transparency and effectiveness are often in conflict. As for the warning sticky: we want this sub to focus on men's rights issues. A sticky is useful when we don't have other important stickies…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 05:59 PM
12

This is how other subs have been taken over. Increase in moderation needs more moderators, the people who step up are the false flag accounts, and then boom. Subreddit is taken over by feminists. This subreddit has outlasted all of the others because it doesn't respond to this kind of trolling by over reacting. Use the report button. We will get to it and remove it.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:52 PM
–

100% this subreddit is being heavily targeted for trolling right now. I guarantee you that there is a dedicated effort underway to try to malign or otherwise change/affect this subreddit.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:48 PM
1

No. Seriously, no. This has been reposted so many fucking times. Get the fuck over it. Right now, a rapist is statistically likely to be a man. This definition isn't sexist. This is just reality. The issue is the laws, not stupid fucking google definitions.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 08:46 PM
1

Hey. You have the top comment here, so we want to personally invite you to take this image, upload it to imgur and then submit it to the subreddit yourself! We are trying to discourage the spam bots from taking over our subreddit, but we don't want to hide the content while doing so. So as much as this post has been removed due to being a spambot submission, we want you to post it again so that you can reap that sweet, sweet karma.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 08:36 PM
1

Right. This is the point that is relevant here - that people are not qualified to judge the guilt or innocence of someone. This subreddit just wants awareness that false accusations, and the public perception of "guilt if accused" leads to ruin lives that don't deserve it.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 02:09 PM
1

"I am going to midquote things to try to push an idea that isn't true." No, it is PRESUMED innocent until proven guilty. Stop being an asshole.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 02:08 PM
6

This is a ridiculous argument. Then the same could be said about "If a court says he did rape her, then he did." Yet we know this to be false. Courts are not infallible. Get over it. The fact of the matter is, as others have said, people get away with crimes all the time. What your title says is NOT what this subreddit is about. And if you can't or won't get that, you won't have a good time here.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 11:54 PM
1

I am fine dropping this issue. But in my years of experience modding, most situations can't be handled well. Someone always complains and won't let issues go. I think this is why you are experiencing what you are experiencing with mods - no matter what we do, people bitch at us. So why should we listen to people anymore? Very few people stick up for us, and everyone is looking for some conspiracy or power trip. So that ends up creating the situation they were fearing in the first place.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 11:44 PM
3

This is another post by a spam bot. Please repost this material at will in a way that WON'T let the spambots win!
/r/MensRights08/10/16 02:47 PM
0

This is such a ridiculous, conspiracy theorist assertion. Not only did I actively encourage other people to repost the same content, but you are also able to see how PLENTY of other similar posts are not removed. It should be absolutely clear and obvious that this isn't censorship. But so many people here are engaged in oppression olympics that they are looking for any reason that they can decry "censorship!" in order to be able to claim that they are oppressed. (They don't use those words, mind…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 12:50 PM
1

I don't want to get into the details. We have some people looking into these things.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 02:12 PM
1

Link to a version of the content that doesn't give ad revenue to the original poster, and go for it! I am all for it!
/r/MensRights07/10/16 02:11 PM
0

Normally, yes. But these spambots are getting a LOT of posts in like this. They use a series of bot accounts to upvote the posts, so the posts aren't really upvoted that much.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 02:11 PM
3

Spam bots are posting this. We are taking a hard line about it.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 03:21 AM
4

No, I did it. It was posted by a spam bot account. The more success they get from /r/MensRights, the more they will invade here. I am trying to take a hard line about this.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 03:20 AM
3

Actually, the issue is that this post was made by one of the spammer bot accounts. We highly encourage people to post the same material for themselves, but we are in a fight to prevent bots from becoming common on /r/MensRights. I posted about this previously.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 03:19 AM
4

You know what causes me to SHRIVEL UP? When people create stupid titles like this.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 07:53 PM
3

It is easy to see how feminism isn't about equality when you consider the common ethics they go by.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 07:48 PM
3

It was very stupid. At one point, one of the trolls was called out for the posts and they replied with "Well, this is the men's club" - essentially declaring that they aren't actually a part of the subreddit and are here just to push a narrative.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 01:16 PM
1

No, he didn't delete it. We deleted it.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 01:07 PM
9

I agree with the points you made. And yes, male-on-female severity is higher, but for obvious reasons - men are, on average, more capable of doing damage. Keep in mind, however, that much of the violence goes unreported, so "I tripped and fell" could easily explain why men don't report as high severity of violence as women do. Without the support to tell them it is okay to admit to being hurt by their partner, they won't do it. Also, keep in mind that EVERYONE agrees that the psychological effec…
/r/MensRights04/10/16 01:01 PM
20

FYI, there are a group of people here with the express purpose of trying to make the sub look bad. A whole shitload of commenters that have never been here before, all with the same type of messages - crude sexual advances and/or attacks. My best guess is that some group wants to make it seem like this subreddit is hostile to women, because this kind of behaviour hasn't been seen before on this sub. Just remember - Twitter found that women were more hostile to other women than men were when look…
/r/MensRights04/10/16 12:55 PM
1

a) You get a restraining order if she is harassing you. b) You record any and all of these conversations to prove that she is trying to threaten you. These are very obvious things. Had you seen a lawyer, I would have expected they would have told you that.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 08:52 PM
–

This is not the appropriate forum for this. We are discussing men's rights, not men's problems. You should try /r/AskMen.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 11:57 PM
2

It seemed like you were defending it.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 01:54 PM
6

No, Stanford simply has an encyclopedia. Did you not read?
/r/MensRights29/09/16 12:16 PM
6

And this is something I strongly disagree with. Pointing out the conclusion does not make the argument any more valid.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 04:11 AM
10

I really like your explanation here. I hope more people see it.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 01:19 AM
7

You aren't thinking about this the right way... Logic, universality, impartiality, rules, etc are all MALE ways of thinking that harm women, according to feminists. Do you think I am lying? Read it for yourself: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/ That's the thing - we don't have to make up fucked up things about feminists. They make it up themselves!
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:59 PM
7

Well, anyone aware of the Duluth Model knows how real and fucked up it is. I was trying to support what you said - I completely agree with you.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:57 PM
41

The Duluth Model is the feminist approach to domestic violence research and counselling. In it, it clearly states that women are an oppressed class, and therefore all violence committed by females is an act of rebellion against their oppressors. It says that women's violence against men is therefore an indicator that the woman was being oppressed by the man, who is therefore guilty of violence. Thus, the man is the one who should be jailed for his violence to her, while the woman goes free.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:41 PM
1

Not sure you have the right sub. Perhaps try /r/MensRants?
/r/MensRights27/09/16 03:06 PM
1

We do. But we also don't allow discussions about race issues, for example, because they aren't topically relevant. politics doesn't allow posts cute cat images. news doesn't allow posts about gruesome, disgusting images. science doesn't allow posts about astrology. See where this is going?
/r/MensRights27/09/16 12:20 PM
0

This sub is topically about the rights of men.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 11:59 AM
0

Not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 03:05 AM
–

Removed.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 11:26 AM
1

I did go to your links. I went through every page. Sofia wasn't even listed. Other people have confirmed it.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 12:47 AM
0

Yeah. You literally made things up. a) You have provided NO evidence of the Facebook discussions you claim happened. b) Your claims about who earned what are completely and totally fictitious.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 06:40 PM
–

I have removed this post. The content is not supported in any way. We don't allow people to try to generate false outrage by making things up.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 06:31 PM
–

As always, controversial issues get heavily reported. I want to remind people that the PRESENCE OF IDEAS YOU DISAGREE WITH IS NOT A VALID REASON TO REMOVE THOSE IDEAS FROM YOUR PRESENCE. You can remove them if you don't want to see them by clicking the HIDE link. But controversial issues need to be discussed, and if you disagree with a perspective THEN YOUR VOICE MATTERS. Convince people that they are wrong for believing a certain way, rather than try to silence them.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 05:23 PM
3

Nothing in the article said that Angelina Jolie was responsible for the investigation.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 03:20 PM
–

This has nothing to do with this subreddit.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 03:13 PM
11

If you think "surveys aren't science", you are clearly missing the point here. This isn't reporting "truth", it is reporting "feeling". In that way, surveys are science. Maybe you lie in surveys. Maybe 10% of people lie, maybe 20% of people like. These things are accounted for when doing surveys. Multiple questions are asked, and validated against each other. Contradictory results suggest a person is lying, and that may be controlled for in the analysis (usually is). Even if there are no contrad…
/r/MensRights21/09/16 04:48 PM
2

Please post this in /r/MensRightsLinks so that it is easier to find in the future.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 04:45 PM
1

You have the wrong subreddit. Try /r/AskMen.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 12:35 PM
3

You realize that scholarships for women have been around for YEARS, right? This isn't anything new. This is just a new set of scholarships. The issue isn't that women are getting scholarships to encourage them in STEM, the issue is that there aren't scholarships to encourage men in the fields that are dominated by women. If the argument is to promote equality, then that needs to be universal.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:58 AM
-2

You know what would be more interesting to post? People actually complaining about the second one, specifically an article showing that they are feminists as you claim. Right now it just looks like you are trying to manufacture a controversy. Back up your claims in the future.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 01:38 PM
–

This has been posted so many times, and the most likely explanation is that it is a troll. This doesn't represent society and just represents people trying to maintain a state of outrage. If you are interested in talking about it, visit one of the hundreds of other threads that have been posted on it over the many years.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 01:26 PM
6

False dichotomy. It can be both. In particular, there is no uniformity across all instances. Sometimes women are treated more leniently, sometimes not. Sometimes men are treated more harshly, sometimes not.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 05:05 AM
9

Wow. I like your description here.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 06:48 PM
2

Oh, cool. I really like your writing! Ever consider doing a /r/MensRights AMA?
/r/MensRights19/09/16 04:44 PM
2

When you say "Toysoldier here", do you mean the person behind the blog?
/r/MensRights19/09/16 02:45 PM
2

No, I just remove things where users lie.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 11:26 PM
1

The title for this post is highly editorialized. I have removed this post.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 11:13 PM
7

Oh wow! That was a great article. Nice job!
/r/MensRights14/09/16 04:55 PM
1

Hey brartod, Are you aware that your condition is an actual medical condition? You should really seek medical help. You shouldn't think of this state as being a consequence of your life experiences, but rather the state is, in many ways, causing the life experiences. It sounds like you need medical help to pull you out of your depression, which will allow you to function around other people in a way that will allow for the bonding and friendship that you crave. Many people view the locus of thei…
/r/MensRights14/09/16 02:33 PM
2

"and news-like sites that steal articles" I don't want to link to them because I don't want to exacerbate the problem. There are sites that are made to look like news sites but they are really just blogs. They have advertisements on them to generate revenue, but their content is taken from a news article from an official news organization. Easy to spot: does the article read like a journalist wrote it but the content is being hosted on a blog? Probably a spam site. Copy and paste the first line …
/r/MensRights12/09/16 04:31 PM
5

This is an example of a ridiculous, short sighted response. I encouraged people to post the ORIGINAL version of the content themselves after reporting the spam version. This is not removing content for the content's sake. Thus, this is not an issue of censorship - it is simply a statement that we want to protect our users from being scammed. We have not said that reposts are bad. We allow reposts. Reposts regenerate new conversation on a topic, remind people of important issues, and otherwise ha…
/r/MensRights12/09/16 04:25 PM
3

That is part of it, yes.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 03:46 PM
–

Yes, this is a bad link. But keep in mind that it has a lot of discussion already and removing it would remove that discussion.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 03:20 PM
–

You could just as easily post this in a self post. I have removed this post for being blatant karma farming.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 12:30 PM
3

There isn't a link between MRAs and anti-semitism. The fact that there SUDDENLY pops up a bunch of people talking about Jews at the same time there is such a strong opponent to it reeks of a coordinated effort. Maybe all of you need a break from this subreddit.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 09:26 PM
1

This is completely irrelevant to this discussion.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 09:24 PM
1

This both did and did not happen. Yes, someone used Inmotmrabut as an account name. We noticed it and banned it.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 11:24 PM
1

Where does she mention /r/MensRights?
/r/MensRights10/09/16 11:22 PM
8

No, I am not.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 11:54 PM
6

Really? You reported someone because you didn't agree with them? WTF is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights09/09/16 11:40 PM
2

This isn't brigading. These are people participating in a discussion that reached /r/all. Brigading is when people collectively and purposefully participate in something as a group in order to control the discussion. This is simply individuals who share similar views.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 10:15 PM
4

haha, we both had the same idea at the same time. I posted the same list.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:35 PM
–

Just because this post is controversial, doesn't mean it should be removed. If you disagree, use your words to voice your opinion. If you think the article contains bigotry or ignorance, use your words to change that. That isn't what the report button is for. The report button is for posts that violate our sidebar rules. Edit: Here are the reports that have been received: 2: Spam 2: <no reason> 1: this subreddit is woman hating TRASH 1: like you fucks care about feminism 1: Threatening, harassin…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:59 PM
-2

In other words, the message went over your head.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 09:48 PM
2

"Fuck me now, big boy" - and a guy has sex with her. Things people say/do CAN ACTUALLY be why someone has sex with them. The post-sex determination of rape is part of the problem. The things people say and do are part of how people communicate consent, therefore it is possible to communicate consent via words and actions. It is ridiculous for you to imply otherwise. The "something" isn't just any old thing, it is very specific things a woman does NOT say or do that makes something rape.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 09:48 PM
5

Well, the post you replied to is getting a decent amount of upvotes. It is a really well explained assessment of the situation. So your sneaking suspicion I think is wrong.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 09:44 PM
3

As far as I can tell, this supports my assertion.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 08:27 PM
0

That means they are lumping them together, it does not mean they are the same thing. Categorization is not definition.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 06:31 PM
–

Please review our rules in the sidebar before posting.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 04:37 PM
2

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 04:13 PM
5

Unfounded does not mean false. A lot of crimes don't get resolved because there is insufficient information/evidence/support to resolve it. Police are dealing with a large amount of work with a limited amount of funding, and so they make determinations on what they believe they are actually able to resolve rather than waste time with something they think they can't. We should be focusing on actual false accusations, not trying to fabricate statistics like feminists do. Don't play their games.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 03:18 PM
1

Can you repost this without the blatant clickbait title or are you a spam bot?
/r/MensRights08/09/16 11:57 AM
2

New account posting strange story on the internet? Usually people respond with /r/thatHappened
/r/MensRights08/09/16 04:03 AM
1

Try to remember that the antidefamation league has an active online presence. I would just ignore this guy.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 12:46 PM
14

People just don't get your comments. This was reported as racism. I am pretty sure you are being derogatory to represent the dismissiveness of feminism towards black male problems.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 12:44 AM
3

Hi New_f4j. You should know that Reddit has a policy about self promotion. If you continue to post material that you produce, you will find your account permanently banned. If you want to participate in reddit, you need to post MORE material from other people than from yourself.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:36 PM
–

I have removed this. It is either fake, or the context has been removed. Unless you can provide some evidence that this is real, and that the context is as is implied here, it is staying removed.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 06:15 PM
0

If you understand how Google's algorithm works, then you can see how and why this is completely legitimate. But people love their conspiracies, and they love their victimhood status...
/r/MensRights04/09/16 02:51 PM
–

This site has serious issues. I am removing it due to the unsafe nature of the site.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 12:43 PM
1

Read the rules of the subreddit.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 11:33 PM
3

Are you aware of the history of the textbook definition in this subreddit? Do you realize how often it gets posted, and thus how unhelpful it is to a discussion? Do you realize how many counter arguments there are to it? Essentially, by posting that, you posted your ignorance of the subreddit. I would bet THAT is why people downvoted you.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 11:32 PM
3

Because people aren't getting together to do it. They are individually doing it. People are allowed to disagree with you, and they are allowed to use the downvote button. In order for them to be "getting together", there needs to be some spot in which people are drawing attention to your posts for the express purpose of downvoting it. You aren't being brigaded, you just aren't popular. You need to exorcise yourself of the victim mentality.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 08:01 PM
2

Reports are anonymous.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 05:53 PM
2

"New" is a label that is applied by each subreddit, based on the user's karma generated within that subreddit alone.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 04:12 PM
3

You are misusing the term "brigading".
/r/MensRights31/08/16 04:12 PM
6

You can be whatever you want. It just isn't relevant to this subreddit. We don't discuss women's rights here. This is the men's rights subreddit.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:35 PM
3

This is a common issue for people who have new accounts (low karma on a subreddit). After a while, you won't be limited anymore.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:34 PM
1

Perhaps you should try /r/AskMen. This isn't a sub for questions and answers about daily life.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 12:11 PM
5

The report button does nothing, though. It takes me a second to push "Ignore Reports". So 10000 people can report it and nothing changes. Pushing the report button requires them to enter a reason, so I would say it is 2-3 seconds. That would be 20000-30000 seconds wasted versus my 1 second. (or however many idgits actually push the report button)
/r/MensRights31/08/16 05:47 AM
28

Depending on the message, it wouldn't be relevant to the subreddit.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:26 AM
–

To the people reporting this post. The message is NOT anti-abortion. It is a statement of how hypocritical it is that our society has normalized abortion and other reproductive rights for women, but treats men as reproductive slaves. Stating that a man who doesn't want a child should "keep it in his pants" should be no more wrong than doing the same to women. Additionally, this message is IN NO WAY inciting or threatening violence. Now shut the f* up and participate in the conversation if you di…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 12:43 AM
1

Your suggestion is how custody used to be handled before the tender years doctrine. It is not necessarily in the best interests of the child, nor does it resolve any of the issues you discussed. Thus, this is a bad idea.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 08:19 PM
–

Removed. The evidence suggests that this is, in fact, fake. (Evidence is elsewhere in the comments.)
/r/MensRights30/08/16 08:17 PM
1

That is a pretty ridiculous statement. One of the moderators tells you that they TRIED to approve your message, but the ADMINS have it on some kind of crazy permaban, and you accuse the subreddit of censoring. I suddenly don't give a shit about approving your comment...
/r/MensRights28/08/16 02:50 AM
–

This doesn't have any relevance here.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:00 PM
1

FYI, your post is caught in the spam filter permanently. I have approved it somewhere around 10 times and it keeps getting caught. Clearly one of your links is on a permanent ban list from the admins.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 07:45 AM
–

This has been posted many times already, and no one is actually linking to the article.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 02:15 AM
1

I have not found a way to enforce users using flair. That would be wonderful if we could. Unfortunately, flair is assigned after posting. At best, maybe Automoderator could be employed to remove posts without flairs, but Automod doesn't reinstate posts after it has been fixed and so the workload for the mods increases.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 04:58 PM
–

You also just got a post removed from this subreddit. Please review our sidebar before posting.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 04:12 PM
1

Is it possible he protested too much? As in he was experiencing cognitive dissonance, and his protests to you were a way of rationalizing the situation (and his own circumcision) to himself?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 04:10 PM
1

Someone justly accused is not relevant here.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:39 PM
2

The problem is that the more choices there are, the less people actually choose them. They just ignore the flair. Keeping it organized is balanced against maintaining use of the system.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:38 PM
1

A false accusation is an injustice, is it not?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:38 PM
–

This is not relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:34 PM
1

Some interesting points. Thanks for the feedback. Not all accusations are relevant to this subreddit. We aren't concerned with protecting the guilty. Also, the length of the flair is finite, and that would be too long. With regards to the others, I will think some more. Clearly the proposed changes are not the final version based on the feedback here.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 12:43 AM
2

Red is supposed to be about men's issues, blue is about tangential issues, purple is "other", and green is a moderator note. Adding more colours doesn't help, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 05:36 PM
1

This response makes no sense. There are more than 3 categories right now. There are more than 3 categories proposed.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 05:34 AM
1

Hmm, good point on the EU/NA.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 05:33 AM
–

Rants go in /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 03:41 AM
–

This subreddit required the use of np.reddit.com links for cross posts.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 02:27 PM
1

This subreddit required np.reddit.com links for cross posts. Please follow our rules.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 02:25 PM
0

There absolutely is accidental rape, and it is in fact the most common kind - at least if feminists are to be believed about the things included as rape. Most rape occurs between two people where one literally believes that they have consent. It is the most confusing aspect of sex, that there can possibly be a disagreement over whether consent was given. And all of the confusion stems around the fact that some people play hard to get (e.g. really do want something but playfully say they don't); …
/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:50 PM
4

"I don't get it, but I want to use this as a platform for a rant about censorship and the moderators." Ah huh.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 01:02 PM
1

No. It doesn't represent. It reflects. It is artistic expression. Are you unfamiliar with art?
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:23 PM
1

It would be fine to leave up if he used the np.reddit.com format... :)
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:22 PM
–

Please use our posting policy to submit crossposts. np.reddit.com links are required.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 10:24 PM
1

This is a politics issue mostly. Something similar did happen to Hillary. Trump isn't being body shamed because he is a man. This is an artistic depiction of him meant to illustrate that he is as unpleasant underneath as he is on the surface.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 10:21 PM
5

In a sense, yes. People are free to point out injustice in the court procedure and other aspects, but it is critical for us to not become the same thing we despise in feminists.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 10:03 PM
1

This is not relevant to men's rights. Interesting story, I feel bad for the girl and think it might be unjust, but this isn't the right place to discuss it.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 07:14 PM
1

Actually, in most places you are allowed to make laws about the number of people in a home for fire/safety reasons. Public safety is a very common argument behind many laws. That is no different than the laws about pepper spray. Now, you may think that pepper spray laws are unfair, and I might agree with you. Defensive weapons that are non-lethal should be allowed, in my mind, including something like pepper spray.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 07:13 PM
1

So you are agreeing with me? (Not sure exactly what your point is here.)
/r/MensRights18/08/16 05:23 PM
1

The rules clearly state that you are not an expert capable of determining whether a person is innocent. Was injustice done? Was evidence neglected? Was there a problem with the trial? You are welcome to draw attention to these things.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 04:21 PM
1

Noted. I don't call it censorship, though, if a person actually has a platform to express their statements. A person proselytizing at patrons in a restaurant will be removed. That isn't censorship, because they are allowed to proselytize on the streets - just not inside the restaurant.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:29 PM
1

If you don't explicitly tell them that the /s symbol is the sarcasm symbol, they don't understand. /s
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:24 PM
3

The whole argument I made in my original post was about courts being fallible. It is pretty silly for you to claim that I don't believe courts are fallible. Mental gymnastics is not going to work here, dude. Claiming something is a fact doesn't mean it is actually a fact. That is, again, what feminists do.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:22 PM
5

So you basically didn't read what I said, but still disagree with me on principle or something?
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:20 PM
1

You should get angrier. That makes your arguments most reasonable. The problem is terminology. You are calling out an almost-tautology in the language I used because you can't see the argument I am trying to make. Innocence in the eyes of the law does not mean that a rape didn't happen. Guilt in the eyes of the law does not mean a rape did happen. A rapist can go free. A non-rapist can go to jail. The legal system is fallible, and therefore there is room to disagree with the legal system. If you…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:20 PM
2

You are engaging in the same kind of social justice that we complain about feminists doing. You are deciding truth independent of the court system. Congratulations, you are a men's version of a feminist.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:09 AM
3

How do you know he was innocent? Why do you have to focus on a post calling him innocent when you could simply make a post drawing attention to the evidence that leads you to believe he is innocent? In other words, what is your motivation for making an absolute claim about guilt/innocence in contradiction with the findings of a court? Some people lately seem to be pushing a perspective that rape isn't that bad, and that anyone found not guilty is a slap in the face of malicious false accusers, s…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 07:41 AM
3

You have an interesting point. The kind of material being curated here are: Malicious false accusations Non-malicious false accusations that result in significant detriment to a person's life. But guilty/not-guilty does not determine whether something is a false accusation. It is often easier to discuss the injustice done in terms of the actual injustices, rather than claiming that something is a false accusation. Thus, the term should be applied only where it is a malicious false accusation. An…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 07:29 AM
2

I think you mean /u/shoe0nreddit.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 11:05 PM
2

Clearly you don't spend any time on the real AMA sub. Dude, you wrote a freaking essay and you wanted someone to spend ~10-20 minutes of their time reading it, assessing it and providing feedback on it when there are HUNDREDS of people wanting to ask them questions all in the space of an hour or so? See a psychologist about the narcissism. It can't be healthy.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 11:04 PM
1

She even answered some the next day.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 11:01 PM
1

A nice person can be pushed to extremes in the wrong situation.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:39 PM
7

Read up on the Duluth Model. It clearly describes all female-on-male violence as self defence. That is the model that feminists use. It is bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:38 PM
8

This subreddit has a lot of different types of people - very broad views participate. Some people are really conservative, others are very liberal. Apparently this AMA attracted some of the people with somewhat... unusual/bizarre views.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 01:02 AM
1

Probability and definitely are two different things. I was not making the Golden Mean Fallacy, just stating a probability.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 12:13 PM
0

Your argument is plausible, but not necessarily correct. Don't confuse plausible with correct. You have your belief, I have mine. The truth probably lies somewhere as a merging of the two.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 05:34 AM
56

Short but to the point. Wow. Well said.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:28 PM
8

I think your statement about "same jail time as a rapist" is a common sentiment among people. However, what I have read suggests this is not the case (see here for example). My intuition leads me to feel that a punishment for the crime is absolutely warranted, and I see nothing wrong with making it as severe as the punishment for the accused crime. I am simply stating that I don't have much faith that it will be effective at reducing the effect/rate of false accusations. :(
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:21 PM
25

Subreddits are designed to be topical. Moderators regularly remove things and then tell people that their post is not topically relevant (different people have different views of what is relevant, but moderators make the call in the end), often suggesting a new place to post it. That being said, some moderators will use that as an excuse to try to get away with removing something that they don't personally like. That is the argument for this situation - the majority of vocal redditors agree that…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:03 PM
23

Thanks for the thorough reply! I appreciate the insight. Great videos, by the way. They are entertaining, humorous (I enjoy sarcasm, so that helps), and topically interesting. As a side note, someone asked in a different thread if you would do a video with some of your (favourite/most interesting) questions/answers from this AMA thread. Just an idea I thought I would pass along if you feel so inclined.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:59 PM
3

This is waaaay too long for an AMA question. The goal is to have Shoe answer many people's questions. This will just monopolize her time. Perhaps you can ask instead if she would be willing to read it and then send it to her as a private message for her to read outside of this AMA?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:53 PM
58

Hey Shoe. Thanks very much for participating in our AMA! We are all really excited. I have two questions for you: What was your motivation for developing your YouTube channel/format/topic/etc? Did you intend for your channel to focus so much on social issues like feminism, or did it gravitate that way due to experiences you had after you started? Thanks again!
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:46 PM
–

The Questions won't be in here. She will be making her own post.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:41 PM
–

I have sent Shoe a message on Twitter. I am sure she is busy with something, but we are trying to get this to happen as soon as possible.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:25 PM
–

There is no need to take a screenshot. Link to the actual article.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 08:58 PM
1

It isn't the message that is the problem, it is the format. This is a classic low effort, karma spam post. We try to curate a higher quality of content here. The idea/message is fine, but we expect our participants to present their ideas in a better manner.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:24 PM
–

We are trying. We are going to have a lot of mods present, but we aren't changing the rules of the subreddit. Shoe is aware of that, and we will be working with Shoe to make it a good experience.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:23 PM
0

A few low quality shit posts got through with enough votes and comments that we didn't remove them. That encourages other shit posters, and now we are having to take a harder line on it. Of note, this one has been removed.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 02:58 PM
–

Low effort image posts will be removed.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:58 PM
–

Just because you can post something, doesn't mean it is allowed here. I have removed this post. Please read our rules before posting in the future.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:40 AM
–

This is a discussion about race, not gender. Thus, it isn't relevant to this subreddit. We had a post about this previously.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:35 AM
1

Agent Orange was not something SRS did. I am well aware of the history here. There exist subreddits designed to talk about SRS. That is where that discussion goes. The subreddit system isn't about making communities, it is about organizing discussion. SRS discussion doesn't get organized here.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 05:51 AM
–

Normally this would not be a valid post here. It is about SRS, it is about moderators on reddit, etc. If these were valid posts, the entirety of /r/MensRights would fill up with them and conversation would devolve into drivel. However, this post has received enough votes for me to set aside the soft rules in favour of allowing the discussion to continue. Note - future posts of this kind will be removed. For people who seem to think they can get easy karma by posting some kind of recreational out…
/r/MensRights11/08/16 07:21 PM
1

See our sidebar. Your titles are separate points being made from the ones in the articles. If you want to make posts like this, you need to use self-posts. The article then becomes support for your point, used in a description of the issue you want to discuss.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:00 PM
4

A little known type of psychological abuse is catastrophizing. One of my past partners used to catastrophize over everything. Everything was so bad, so horrible, even minutia that all people normally deal with. And it was really just an attempt to kick the innate "white knight" aspect of men into over drive. She was used to getting men to do what she wanted, and that was how she did it.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 01:54 PM
1

Sorry to hear about your troubles. If you wish to discuss a rant, please visit /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 01:48 PM
-1

Your language implies that "white" is "normal", by saying "born differently".
/r/MensRights10/08/16 12:03 PM
1

Disputed accounts are not evidence of a false accusation.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 09:46 PM
3

Here you go. MUCH better image.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 02:32 AM
1

This would be more effective if, instead of the crappy red text, the words were colour coded: pink = fine by feminists, blue = evidence of patriarchy. Everything above 55-60% would be pink. Everything at the bottom (below 80ish%, where it is all physical labour) would be pink. And then selections within the remaining range would be pink/blue as fits the common narrative.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 02:11 AM
1

You have the wrong subreddit. Try /r/TheRedPill.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 02:22 PM
7

Duh. My bad. Thanks for reminding me!
/r/MensRights07/08/16 02:03 PM
0

No, I don't have a source. It was >1y ago that it was implemented.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 05:40 AM
-4

How dare moderators not be present on the subreddit 24h a day, 7 days a week! How dare volunteers have lives! That isn't a tactic, that is an actual thing. The admins actually implemented something to account for what you said - anything that has been removed has its time decay effect frozen. So when it is restored, it is restored to the same state, no worse off.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 04:02 AM
9

To people reporting this as racism, you are missing the point. The use of the term is to reference how white people treated black people a hundred years or more years ago in the US.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 01:32 PM
-13

You aren't wrong. But there is enough votes/discussion here that I don't feel comfortable removing it now.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 01:16 PM
1

This was already posted here.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 04:58 PM
1

This isn't relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 02:52 PM
1

There are "Social Justice" subreddits that this would be appropriate for.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 05:13 AM
1

You quoted something that wasn't said. Next time, post the accurate quote.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 03:19 PM
14

Milo did no such thing. He just talked about other people discussing the wage gap. Good god, the guy does some good/interesting things, but some people really need to stop worshiping the guy.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 05:02 AM
6

Great article, but I saw some of the MRM in the discussion. There are people here who kafka trap by maligning all feminists in an unfalsifiable way, making them individually responsible for all of the bad things of feminism. I have a tough time reconciling someone denying "NAFALT" and claiming to not kafkatrap.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 02:15 PM
–

Please read our sidebar before posting.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 05:45 PM
1

Right. Which is why this post is deleted, was not highly upvoted, and is wildly unpopular. "This sub has devolved" my ass. You just want to enjoy some smug self righteousness.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 04:16 AM
1

Whew. Thanks. I appreciate that. Helps me out a lot.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 06:22 PM
1

You are taking someone's real name, you are calling it a scam, and you are connecting it to an online persona. Yeah, this fits all the criteria for organizing a backlash mob under the reddit rules. Removed.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 12:19 PM
6

This is your only warning. Advocating violence is not welcome here.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 09:10 PM
6

I think that is one of her best videos yet. That is fantastic.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 03:29 PM
–

This is your only warning: Gross editorializing of titles will get you a ban from this subreddit. Either you are honest, or you are out.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 03:21 PM
1

The doomsayers have been around for years, and yet this sub keeps going. Heavy handed moderation always leads to a reduction in subscribers. If you want pure men's rights content, you need to participate in the dedicated blog sites. /r/MensRights is a link aggregator, not a primary community. We are not trying to supplant places like AVoiceForMen or other men's rights groups.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 01:54 AM
1

Circumcision message aside (I am an intactivist), that dialogue was hilarious.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 05:03 PM
–

To the people reporting this post: Yes, we get it. You don't think it belongs here. I might even agree with you. But, as always, this achieved sufficient participation before we noticed the reports. In order to preserve the conversation, we are not removing it.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 05:12 AM
3

I completely agree with this sentiment. It doesn't matter if a group of people are "on top" of some artificial averaging hierarchy. Demonization, denigration, etc of any group of people is bad for society.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 02:14 AM
–

np.reddit.com rules are enforced on this subreddit. Please re-submit your link with proper format.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 02:35 PM
1

Stop being a child and let it go. For fuck's sake. Be the bigger person if you think he is trolling you.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:17 PM
0

Making a database is taking social justice into your own hands. You are literally a social justice warrior.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 01:39 AM
16

A Saudi prince is the second largest share holder, but not a majority share holder.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:41 AM
6

You know that brings up an interesting point... An argument coming out of intersectionality concepts is that it is cultural appropriation for white people to take on aspects of black culture. Is it genderal appropriation for women to take on male traits or vice versa? Hmm. That is a really interesting thought, and I would like to get into a debate about that to try to resolve it.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 07:15 PM
1

Breitbart writers tend to be anti-government, so it isn't surprising that they would view the government as the "true" antagonists from the first film. We all view things through glasses coloured by our own biases. I have not seen the new Ghostbusters, and I am not going to comment on it. I am only commenting on the review I read and how it is clearly written from a particular perspective.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:24 PM
–

People - seriously, if you disagree then post your disagreement and back it up as an argument. Using ad hominem against the author in a report to the moderators to step in and remove something you don't or disagree with isn't going to work.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:21 PM
–

Blogspam gets removed.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 10:00 AM
–

This kind of content is the most bottom feeding of all possible. You took a fucking picture of an image with your phone rather than linked to the image directly? What the hell is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights15/07/16 03:57 PM
1

Reddit has a very unusual policy, that is non-uniformly enforced, that pictures of Twitter and Facebook must have names greyed out in order to shield people from harassment originating from Reddit as a consequence of their statements.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 04:23 PM
1

This is non-content. If you want to rant about things, try /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 04:21 PM
1

Sounds like a tangential issue. Self post arguing the point would suffice.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 04:35 PM
–

Wrong subreddit.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 03:53 PM
2

We work much better with direct messages than people posting outrage on the sub. This should be in the meta sub, but we didn't see it before it blew up. People have lives, sleep, etc. Users of this sub are itching for a fight against establishment, so things blow WAY out of proportion to what they should. This was a simple, little problem. The other mods disagreed with my decision, we took a vote, the decision was overturned, no big deal. Happens all the time. No one is perfect.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 08:22 PM
-2

Someone linked the videos, I watched them, she says "no stop", and she isn't an active participant in the sex. All the media says the same thing.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 02:45 PM
-11

It is used when we leave notes indicating why we remove posts. It isn't an abuse, you just disagree with it.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 02:43 PM
-2

You are confusing "proof" with "I have stated a position". You don't speak truth, you speak propositions and you fail at providing proof.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 05:43 AM
1

I do a lot of the removal of the MHA guy. He has been spamming the subreddit since before I was a moderator. He has been told repeatedly that the rules are you can't spam your own content (we hold AVFM to the same criteria), and posts have to follow the rules of the subreddit. He doesn't follow those rules, so he isn't welcome here. He uses a VPN to create new accounts to bypass reddit site-wide bans (admins are well aware of him, his behaviour is coded into the sitewide spam filter, but he chan…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 05:42 AM
-11

In the second one, it doesn't show her doing much of anything. At the very end, you can faintly hear her say "no stop" (or that is what it sounds like). In the first one, it is edited to show her prior to the sex, but when the sex actually happens she is turning her head away from the penis and doesn't not seem fully aware of what is going on. I don't think either of those videos support the claim that she wasn't raped. They don't prove conclusively that she was, since a lot of stuff is edited o…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 05:38 AM
-21

Please do. I can only go by the evidence presented in the article. If someone uses a more appropriate article, then it would have a different ruling.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 05:09 AM
0

Are you saying that they dissent to sympathy?
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:32 PM
10

I completely agree with this sentiment. As a hilarious note, I posted in a thread they were using to discuss the situation with my sympathies for the loss of their community. I got hate responses and was banned from that sub.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 02:14 PM
-2

This is going to be your only warning. You are not allowed to advertise for your own site on Reddit. If I see your posting anymore than 1 in 10 links to your own site, I will ban you from the subreddit.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 12:28 PM
–

Rants go to /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 11:06 PM
1

Clearly you are overly sensitive about this issue. The migrants themselves are not being bashed. Remember - ideas can be criticized. Islam is an ideology, and criticism of an ideology is perfectly acceptable discourse. Criticism of behaviour, ideas, etc are all fine. Criticism of people based on aspects that they have no control over - gender, skin colour, etc is wrong.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 11:05 PM
–

This sub is about men's rights, not about "look at how stupid women are". Take that somewhere else.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 07:25 PM
10

Why would you say that people here despise Muslim migrants? People here point out that feminists fabricate issues in western countries (such as wage gap), and yet ignore the plight of women in countries where they actually do have fewer rights than men (for example, middle eastern countries). But that is very different from despising Muslim migrants.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 07:16 PM
3

"So while the attrition numbers aren’t great, I’m massively encouraged by the fact that at least in these findings, it’s not about systemic bias against women or women being bad at computers or whatever. Rather, it’s about women being bad at dusting themselves off after failing, which, despite everything, is probably a lot easier to fix." So wait... the responsibility isn't on men's shoulders for discriminating against women? Wow! What a shocker.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 09:46 PM
1

Right. But is that an issue of rights? The issue of rights comes in where men are penalized in some way for wage differences that are natural consequences of differences in gendered behaviour.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 10:40 PM
-11

Isn't this more TRP material?
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:44 PM
1

I have removed this post for gross misrepresentation of the article.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:07 PM
1

Did you think it possible that perhaps the reason you aren't friends anymore has nothing to do with the topic of the discussion, and everything to do with the poor communication by all three parties involved? Your friend posted something in a very inane way, and if their intent was to make a joke, they clearly don't know how to make jokes. You had a pretty strong response to it, when you could have more calmly said "I appreciate your opinion, but I think you would have made your point better if …
/r/MensRights24/06/16 05:17 AM
–

To the people reporting this post: Yes, we get it that you don't support leniency against Brock Turner. Yes, I personally agree with you. No, that isn't what this post is about - this post is about whether or not mandatory sentences will be applied to false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 03:50 AM
8

These questions aren't PC. It isn't surprising that researchers don't want to touch it with a 10 foot pole, considering how risky it can be to their jobs.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 04:35 PM
2

That is an interesting point...
/r/MensRights23/06/16 03:56 PM
16

Interesting... I do like reading these kinds of datasets. I think this makes an interesting statement about the whole body shaming issue...
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:05 PM
2

It is quite possible that the OP also posted the message they linked to in order to generate drama.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 10:26 PM
3

You shouldn't hit people, regardless of gender. ;)
/r/MensRights21/06/16 07:51 PM
1

I sent her a twitter message. She responded. She is in, but is busy for a few weeks. I will message her again in a few weeks.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 06:42 PM
2

Ah. I see. My bad.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 06:13 PM
2

Hey. What about the Shoe On Head youtube personality? I don't know her real name, so I can't give that name, but it might make for a very interesting AMA.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 06:12 PM
1

We didn't remove it.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 05:58 PM
–

The title of this post has been HIGHLY editorialized. Normally we would take this down as it appears to be a clear attempt by the OP to misrepresent reality to push an agenda. There isn't anything that supports the claim made by the OP. However, this has enough votes and comments to leave it up in order to encourage the discussion. I hope people will judge for themselves the situation presented in the link. Clearly the situation appears to denote some kind of unfairness, but the gender aspect of…
/r/MensRights21/06/16 04:37 PM
2

Yeah. They have been at it for a few days now. There has been a fairly significant increase in trolling going on.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:52 AM
–

This is not relevant to this subreddit. You did something stupid and illegal. You admit to it. Or rather, you are a troll and you are trying to get people on this subreddit to support some ridiculous fantasy that feminists have of the people here. Go fuck off.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 01:05 AM
1

You must be new here.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 02:02 PM
1

Read our policies. We ban for those reasons. That is it.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 12:33 PM
1

Why? What the hell has this person said that breaks our rules?
/r/MensRights19/06/16 08:35 PM
–

This is not relevant here.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 04:00 PM
3

As far as articles go, that one was more fair and balanced than most. At least it ended with Elam's response, rather than leaving the accusation of misogyny unchallenged.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 01:33 PM
9

Nobody would ever lie about being a victim.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:17 PM
3

I don't think you understand the concepts here... An argument between A man and A woman is not indicative of any issues of gender rights. Only the trends between situations are relevant.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 05:35 PM
–

This isn't an issue of men's rights.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 05:03 PM
–

Please follow our rules when posting.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 10:33 PM
-5

Why the hell would this post be reported? Some people just don't understand the difference between "I don't like this" and "this doesn't belong here".
/r/MensRights15/06/16 04:24 PM
-2

There are plenty of subreddit drama and other type of subs that focus on the meta activities within Reddit. We have a responsibility to maintain the topicality of this subreddit. You wouldn't complain about a pic being removed from /r/News, nor a joke being removed from /r/Politics. People need to disambiguate the idea of "I like this post" from "this is where this post should be." The whole theory of reddit is that it has grown based on moderators maintaining the topicality criteria of the subr…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:43 PM
-2

Good for you. You get a gold star!
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:40 PM
-45

But this isn't the place for it.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:39 PM
–

This received too many upvotes and comments in the short period of time since being posted for us to remove it. But it does violate our posting policy. Our preference is to encourage discussion, and that trumps our rules about posts on moderators of other subs.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:28 PM
1

The person you are responded to went on a spamming spree, where they posted 20+ posts suggesting that men should beat up women. He argues that this is the case because he was attacked by women in his life. So we banned him. He created new accounts. We banned them. We got the admins involved to give him a sitewide ban for spamming. They did. He got a proxy or whatever to continually spoof his IP address, and now creates a series of new accounts to spam his crap.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 11:01 PM
1

You sound like an interesting person to have a beer with - a lot of life experiences for your age. I appreciate your point of view. The reason why I adhere to the men's rights activist moniker is because I think it is important to not let the "men are evil" concept overcome the right of men to organize and defend themselves and their rights. By simply talking about it, I lose that solidarity with others, even when I disagree with what other believe.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 11:05 PM
1

Catcalls are like sexual assaults. A few people can offend against a very large number of people. As a result, it feels like it is a bigger issue than it necessarily is - if you measure the weight of the issue based on the offenders rather than the victims. But focusing on victims leads to false positives, so focusing on the offenders needs to be the issue. It isn't all men, it isn't even a large portion of men, and it isn't only men. Men just don't complain about the inappropriate things that w…
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:59 PM
2

The original quote is satire, from what my google-fu tells me.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:31 PM
7

Watch the video. The title is explained in the first 1 minute.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:09 PM
5

Did you watch the video? This is explained in the first 1 minute.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:09 PM
1

This is ridiculous. Link to the actual article rather than taking a screenshot. There is nothing wrong with Breitbart.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 02:46 PM
2

This subreddit discusses false rape allegations, not actual rape allegations.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 05:45 AM
1

You didn't post the cross link correctly. I have removed this.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 08:00 PM
1

Only a lawyer can answer legal questions. You should not seek legal advice in a subreddit.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 08:37 PM
1

Removed for gross misrepresentation of the title.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 10:10 AM
0

This post contains no content. Removed.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 04:46 AM
1

This post is a non-content post. I have removed it. If you want to make posts on the topic, do so with actual content. A title alone is insufficient.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:33 PM
1

Your account has been shadowbanned by the admins. You may wish to message them to find out why, or get a new account.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:32 PM
–

A note from the moderators: This is an incredibly contentious issue that has quickly become one of the most highly voted on topics in the subreddit's history. There are a lot of heated, angry words as people take moral and ethical stands. As a result of the high voting rates on this post, many people are seeing it on /r/All, and therefore are not necessarily subscribers to this subreddit and do not represent the common views of this subreddit. Try to treat this post as if it were representative …
/r/MensRights02/06/16 05:50 AM
1

Yup.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 07:36 PM
1

This is not an issue of men's rights.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 07:35 PM
1

See the sidebar.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 08:14 PM
1

We have a rule about low effort image posts - this specifically refers to ones that are in the "advice animal" format. Simple image with simple text overtop.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 03:25 PM
1

That style of shirt is often called a "wife beater" when men wear them. This shirt is humorously called a "husband beater" to poke fun at that. Your "imagine if the genders are reverses" comment doesn't apply because the genders are reversed on a regular basis and no outcry is made. You have posted this multiple times, but it isn't getting through because it is a NON ISSUE. You are fabricating outrage at something where there is no outrage.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 03:32 PM
–

To the large number of people reporting this post: Yes, we get that this image is not normal content for this subreddit. By the time the moderators noticed it, the comment section was sufficiently full that removing this post would have removed access to valuable discussions. Our policy for removal of off-topic, irrelevant or low-quality posts is superseded by our desire to foster discussions. As a result, we will not be removing this post. If you dislike the material in this post, we advise you…
/r/MensRights28/05/16 05:42 AM
1

Rants go in /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 05:20 PM
1

Since you didn't read our sidebar before posting, I am going to assume you didn't read their sidebar before posting.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 02:16 PM
9

I am really confused... If you define hate speech as only speech of a misogynistic or racial nature, why are you surprised when only women and black men are the targets?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 01:28 PM
1

Read our sidebar before posting please.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 10:15 PM
1

There are many posts on this topic already. Contribute to the existing ones rather than posting yet another one.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 02:53 PM
1

There are many posts on this story already. Please contribute to the existing posts rather than starting yet another one.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 02:52 PM
2

Apparently you have been shadowbanned. Either contact the admins to get it resolved or get a new account.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 12:25 PM
-1

We all do. We don't need a circle jerk of stupid moderators telling us what we already know.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 09:07 PM
0

You talked about men. They don't like that unless it is negative. Double standards can be found everywhere. If you want to have that discussion, maybe start it up without referring to a subreddit filled with ignorant idiots?
/r/MensRights23/05/16 06:28 PM
1

You do realize that this subreddit is 8 years old now, and old issues don't need to be rehashed?
/r/MensRights23/05/16 06:27 PM
0

Since you didn't read our sidebar before posting, I am guessing you didn't read theirs either. If you don't follow subreddit rules, you don't get to talk there. That is the way of all of reddit. Why is this hard to understand?
/r/MensRights23/05/16 02:06 PM
3

So glad that I am not American and don't have to make such a horrible decision between Trump and Hillary.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 03:26 PM
1

If the comments show that, then you need to make a post that focuses on that. Why not repost the information as a self-post, and then explicitly talk about where you find the accusations of sexism.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:53 AM
1

I can only go by the feedback we get. If you are lurking, you choose not to have a say in things. Also note that we push back against those who want more moderation. I tried to make that clear. We don't censor people for saying "cunt" or other rude words. We don't censor people for being angry, or saying rude things. We specifically have in our rules that we won't do that. All we do is keep things topical. Some people think that this is a community, and that is where the disagreement lies.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 10:43 PM
1

I have removed your post. If you edit it to use np.reddit.com instead of www.reddit.com I will reinstate it. We use the No Participation rules on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 07:52 PM
0

Nothing in the article says that parks are sexist. The terms "missing out" indicate that people aren't using them, not that the system is preventing them from using them. This is just rabble rousing.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 04:29 PM
1

We don't control people's speech here, so people get to say basically what they want, how they want. Thus, you are going to have people who are angry venting all along side reasoned, enlightened discussion.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:37 PM
2

As always, GWW, if something isn't immediately understandable as to how it relates to the MRM, then we allow people to post self posts describing the relationship. The majority of users on this subreddit are new to the MRM, which means that they aren't steeped in the history like you and many others are. When they see character attack posts like the Emma Watson ones, they view it as petty attacks. It doesn't draw people in, it pushes them away. By requiring people to put these posts into context…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 02:30 PM
-1

I understand the interest that many people on this subreddit would have for this topic, but it isn't an issue of rights. This would be more appropriate for /r/TheRedPill.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:08 PM
-1

Since you can't seem to learn the rules of ANY subreddit, you don't get the courtesy of your posts being visible! Congratulations.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 04:58 PM
3

a) Unbelievable story posted on a sub that has many posted in ideological disagreement with this sub. Check. b) Lack of NP linking. Check. c) OP claims that they were banned from the other sub to play on censorship concerns. Check. Yup. Yup, I get that feeling, too.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:05 PM
1

There is no paternity for women, so it can't be biological.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:03 PM
1

That would not surprise me at all.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:02 PM
1

Please see our sidebar for cross posting rules.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:02 PM
0

I very specifically said you can comment on anything that they do that is related to men's rights.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:34 AM
-2

We are open to change. You just haven't made a convincing argument. You have disagreed with something we have done, and then accused us of censorship to try to get your way. That isn't an argument, that is an accusation. It is not us who are attacking people. We are defending ourselves. Look at your own behaviour - this is someone else who disagrees with you and your immediate response is to attack them. Your hypocrisy is outrageously blatant.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:21 PM
0

The candidates themselves aren't specific Men's Rights topics. Their perspectives on men's rights issues are, certainly.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:17 PM
1

Your title is incoherent, and Roosh V material belongs on /r/TheRedPill.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:51 AM
1

This would probably be better on /r/TheRedPill
/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:49 PM
1

Why are you sorry? I don't care. I just didn't know.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 07:47 PM
0

This isn't about men's rights. It would probably be more appropriate for a place like TumblrInAction.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 01:41 PM
1

What a lot of this discussion seems to be is a small subset of people being very vocal about claiming to be censored. The irony of this is outstandingly hilarious.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 05:51 AM
0

Two people really is a majority for this subreddit, isn't it? My, my, my you have a high opinion of yourself.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 05:47 AM
2

Thank you for this post. I appreciate it. The issue at hand is not actually about censorship because everyone else here won't use the term censorship to apply to something like removing a post about chocolate. Censorship isn't just removing things, it is removing things for a specific purpose. The issue at hand, as you have addressed is what is a legitimate removal, and therefore what is "on topic". That has always been the issue at hand in this debate. The moderators here have determined criter…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 05:43 AM
1

We don't really discuss it. Political affiliation is not a requirement of being a moderator, contrary to what these people claim. I think AnnArchist is a conservative, but he isn't on as much anymore.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 11:11 PM
-2

If you don't understand how reddit works, you should probably not make claims that show how uninformed you are. Maybe instead you should ask questions so that you understand? The issue with the meta posting has been discussed over and over again. You have definitely been exposed to that argument, but you refuse to actually address it because your efforts aren't about making correct, factual and influential statements, but rather about being divisive and manipulative.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 11:09 PM
1

I am such a blight on the community that it has grown continually, year after year, and continues to flourish. The SRS accusation is so ridiculous as to be absurd. Can't you come up with a better character assassination?
/r/MensRights12/05/16 11:07 PM
4

If he is a tradcon, then I was ignorant, not lying. If he isn't, then I wasn't lying. Either way, you aren't the sole arbiter of good and evil politics, nor do you get to choose what people are.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 06:49 PM
2

Really? I didn't realize FFXIV was a tradcon. Well then, that just makes your argument even weaker! Congratulations - you accuse me of lying, of which it is plainly obvious it is simply ignorance of the political leanings of the mods (further showing I really don't care about individual politics/economics), all while gloating in a post that proves you wrong. Way to go, dude.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 06:43 PM
3

We have conservatives. We just don't have tradcons.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 06:30 PM
4

There were multiple different places it was being discussed before. They were collected into one, with links to the original, in a place where it could be easily referenced in the future, and then a post was stickied to draw as much attention as possible.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 02:06 PM
6

I called it. I said you were making a power play here. Thanks for proving me right.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 12:57 PM
1

The whole point of the meta thread is that meta topics are important to be able to reference. These kinds of things get lost in the main subreddit. By keeping the discussion to the meta subreddit, people can refer to it easier and quicker in the future.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 05:34 AM
1

This is completely unrelated to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 05:32 AM
2

You don't get to choose the format of the subreddit. You are free to create your own subreddit with your own rules if you refuse to play by the ones created for you.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 05:27 AM
1

This is a meta topic and belongs in /r/MensRightsMeta.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 12:33 AM
1

28 posts have been removed in the last 24 hours. Most of them by Automoderator (~20). 14 posts have been approved in that time. The difference includes the 2 Emma Watson posts that I removed, and then a shit ton of posts by our resident spammer. The only posts that were not considered spam that were removed were the ones on Emma Watson, as far as I can tell. This definitely does not amount to significant moderator involvement. There were 67 new posts in the last 24 hours that were not removed. T…
/r/MensRights11/05/16 09:55 PM
0

That is like telling /r/Pics not to remove videos. Or /r/Politics not to remove Chinese politics. Things that are off topic don't belong on the subreddit. Subreddits are created for topics, and that is why people visit them. If you want the topic of "Look at how stupid this person is" go to a different subreddit for that topic.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 09:49 PM
-1

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ad+hominem
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:30 PM
0

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=ad+hominem
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:30 PM
1

Race is not gender.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 02:01 AM
0

This is a character attack, and thus isn't a part of men's rights.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 02:00 AM
2

This has no place here. This is your warning.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 07:21 PM
1

Declaration of innocence in the courts does not mean that it was a false accusation. Similarly, declaration of guilt in a court does not mean it was an actual rape. We discuss false accusations on this subreddit in the context of the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty. This person was found not-guilty, so he was afforded that right. Thus, this is not an instance of false accusations that is relevant to this subreddit, at the very least. It is NOT up to this subreddit to determin…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 06:16 PM
1

This doesn't belong here. You haven't provided any evidence of anything, you aren't adding a new discussion (something that hasn't been rehashed hundreds of times), and you are just kind of ranting about it. Try /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 03:59 PM
0

The article does not show that this has anything to do with their change in pay. The title of this post suggests something not supported by the article itself. I am removing this post. If you want to make this claim, you need to have a better argument.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 03:44 PM
1

This is a race issue, not a gender issue.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 03:07 PM
0

This belongs on TRP or some other place. It isn't about men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 03:02 PM
0

Get this shit off this subreddit.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 01:54 PM
2

Feel free to use the Reddit search feature to look up past polls on this subject. No need to rehash it yet again.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 03:21 PM
1

This has nothing to do with this subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:00 PM
1

The purpose of the "woman cards" is to take a shot at something Trump said. It isn't actually about special female privileges. Thus, this has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:47 AM
28

This article in no way suggests that this subreddit supports or promotes the things Anders Breivik did. While potentially incredibly controversial, this post does have some relevance here in that it raises questions about whether our society's lack of care about boys and men repeatedly fails to prevent extreme behaviour.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 01:49 PM
3

PUAs, MRAs, and all the rest are part of the "manosphere", yes. They are not all MRAs, though. The manosphere is simply a term to describe the collection of websites that focus on issues with a male target audience (rather than female or unisex). There is a femisphere, too, and it includes calmer feminist websites, as well as extremist feminist websites. These are terms to describe trends, not groups of people.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 11:00 AM
0

This belongs in /r/Science or some other similar sub.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 03:48 PM
1

This isn't directly a men's rights issues. There are anti-SJW subs if you wish to post it there.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 09:42 PM
3

It doesn't lower CS, generally, unless there is a component of CS that has to do with the income differential between the parents. It does lower alimony because the intent of alimony is to maintain a standard of living. If that person has another source of income, regardless of the origin of it, then they need less support to maintain that standard of living.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:20 PM
1

There are challenges with collecting this kind of data. A person should be wary about making claims that the data cannot actually support due to problems with the data collection. Many people make claims that cannot be founded.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:48 PM
1

a) The girls are younger than the boys, so when the boys are sexually mature the girls still won't be. b) There was concern for people showing emotional distress. The boys didn't show as much emotional distress. c) There was concern for the whole event, not just for the little girls involved.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:44 PM
2

That is a different guy.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:38 PM
1

Yup. That is why I removed it.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 04:18 PM
1

Your title is a clear manipulation of the article. I have removed this post.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 04:18 PM
1

Low effort image post. This could easily be made with a text post. The image has nothing to do with the text.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 03:31 PM
1

Dude, CRT is awesome. The image quality is crystal clear compared to 4k IPS panels. Duh.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 03:16 PM
1

Men spend their whole lives learning to hold back their emotions, temper their strength, etc. Women don't. The socialization leads to very different expressions of violence.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:26 PM
2

mwobuddy is talking about reasons for the biased/slanted collection of data. Your argument doesn't supercede his. He is claiming your data is invalid.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:25 PM
4

That is a difficult call to make. Lethal abuse is very rare, so the statistics are very small and thus much more susceptible to bias. There are cases where mother abuse leads to death, but it is treated as postpartum or other excuse for mental health reasons and therefore may not be counted in their results. In other words, be wary of HOW they count their results, especially when it comes to rare occurrences. Also, yes, this is a generally known effect. Much like domestic violence, women commit …
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:19 PM
2

We have 100k people who are reporting you because they dislike your spam and agree with us. But you know what, your caps lock is really effective. I think I am starting to change my opinion all of a sudden. CHANGE ALL MONITORS! USE LCD SCREENS INSTEAD OF CRT! DOWN WITH CRT MONITORS! (Idiot can't even use the right terminology... Way to go.)
/r/MensRights20/04/16 01:06 PM
1

It wouldn't hold up in court. There is no proof that a person has their phone on them at all times. The prosecution would just argue that the person goes have given the phone to a friend or left it somewhere or did something else with it. I appreciate the intention, but men need proof they didn't rape someone, not circumstantial evidence. We are held to a different standard. Plus, a lot of false rape accusations occur because two people actually did have sex, and the debate is over whether it wa…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 11:05 AM
2

a) You aren't given a voice here because you are a dirty little spammer, and I cannot abide by people like you. b) We oppose doxxing on all levels. There is a difference between promoting something, and opposing something. If a post goes up drawing attention to doxxing of males, we are going to leave it up as a public awareness thing. If a post goes up telling people to doxx women, we are going to take it down. c) If you spent even a tiny little bit of your time trying to understand Reddit inste…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 11:03 AM
1

This is a duplicate post. Contribute to the original post rather than reposting the same material.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 07:19 PM
2

There are some parallels between your story and mine, only the abuser was female. My experiences with other people are similar, though, and they caused me to join the MRM.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 11:16 AM
-1

So basically you have a project that requires some very difficulty, very involved research and you want other people to do it for you? Old records weren't digitized. If you want that information, you may very well have to do reading in an actual library.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 11:07 AM
1

Take this as a warning. You are free to discuss issues all you want, but if you want to go on anti-woman tirades you can find someone else to do it.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 08:02 PM
7

Much like atheists, a lot of anti-feminists are informed on the issues.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 02:26 AM
1

This is a women's rights issue, not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 10:56 AM
4

Did you read the article? Did you see the end where it said "No girls were touched, no girls were harmed" (I am paraphrasing)? A group of boys hire a stripper and the last thing on people's minds would have been the boys being harmed. This is clearly a double standard situation, and it is valid here.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 10:36 AM
14

That person doesn't speak for the subreddit. We do welcome feminists. We just don't give them a safe space.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:08 PM
2

Your sympathy is appreciated, but you should not feel the need to apologize.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:58 PM
1

We already have a rule in the sidebar about banning posts. But we aren't going to tell people what to do.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 06:32 AM
2

We don't forbid information from Gawker, just direct links. People can use archive sites to link to the Gawker pages.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 10:13 AM
7

We stand by our fundamental principles.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 06:10 PM
–

In case anyone is wondering: Yes, I recognize that this is a ReturnOfKings post. And yes, that site is generally not something posted here. But we don't forbid information that is relevant to this subreddit, no matter its source. If someone finds that the story is false, misleading, or otherwise editorialized to an extreme that makes it deceiving, then we will remove it. Otherwise, this post stays up.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 01:06 PM
0

This is not an issue of men's rights, because it is a %. This doesn't mean that fewer men are involved in the labour force, it just means that a smaller fraction of the labour force is men. We don't need to fabricate things to make our points. We need to stick to real statistics.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 02:18 PM
3

The problem is that the rules about "hate speech" kick in when people are "against" something. So anti-feminism is seen as hate speech in the same way that an anti-Islam, anti-Christianity, or any other group might be seen as hate speech.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 02:15 PM
2

We should create a sub called "Men's Rights Politics" so you people can go at it.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 05:46 PM
1

Why not try educating yourself on the issues between the men's rights movement and the feminist ideologies before you ask these questions? They accuse us of being misogynists because we dare criticize women (as individuals, not as a whole) and feminism (as an ideology; it is subject to the same treatment as any other ideology). We accuse them of actively working to oppose equal rights for men. The vast amount of evidence shown on this subreddit, much of which you can read in the links in the sid…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:33 PM
0

This has no place on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:26 PM
3

Account is brand new. The post was removed off of /r/MensRights a while ago, yet they claim to have received a significant amount of funding. Without significant proof, I would say this is just another in the long list of people trying to scam donations out of /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 10:33 AM
1

This is racial, not gender.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 08:29 PM
3

Sure, but I interpreted the person's response as suggesting that they were volunteering for modhood.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 02:16 PM
2

Well, since I removed your post, apparently correct!
/r/MensRights05/04/16 10:08 AM
11

Taking on more help means risking opening ourselves to a fake account getting power. That is how a lot of other subreddits have been killed in the past - someone faking being supportive becomes a mod and moves their way up the system.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 07:01 AM
1

Rants go to /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 06:51 AM
1

That was a great video. One of her best.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:10 AM
1

This is not an issue of men's rights. It is an issue of women's rights. Talk about it on women's rights forums.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 11:34 AM
2

Playing with them encourages them and they try harder/more.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:23 PM
7

I just worked 9 straight hours. Other mods also have jobs. Are the members here so weak that they can't handle a few trolls until the mods come on to clean things up?
/r/MensRights31/03/16 09:23 PM
1

He isn't a troll. The issue is that he has been a) spamming his own blog a lot, and b) posts a lot of non-men's rights stuff about how women are bad, blah blah blah. Reddit admins keep shadowbanning his accounts for spamming his own blog (which is against the reddit rules), and then we removed his off topic stuff. So he decided to be a child and went on a rampage, spamming other stuff. That puts him on ban status on this sub. He doesn't see how the things that happen to him are caused by his own…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 12:05 PM
2

Whether or not I agree with you, a lot of your posts lately have been purely political. I don't care about comments - argue away. But the main posts don't have anything to do with men's rights. Yes, political and economic systems can have affects on men's rights, but only due to the choices that are made within that system. None of them are inherently better or worse for men's rights. Thus, arguing about them is not related to men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 12:57 AM
–

I completely agree. I had seen this issue growing and was ignoring it, but I agree with EP.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 11:01 AM
-3

Yes, use racist comments. Smart thinking. You are a genius. Hmm, learn something new every day...
/r/MensRights27/03/16 12:42 PM
4

He fucked himself over. No one here did anything to him.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 12:41 PM
4

We are not the courts. It is not our place to determine that someone was falsely accused. That label comes after a court case, not before.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 06:25 PM
0

His guilt or innocence is not an issue of men's rights. The issue of men's rights is whether he is given his right to a fair trial, and not maligned in the media before the verdict.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:47 PM
7

Unlikely. The person you are responded to is likely just pushing their own agenda. We are seeing a lot more of that lately - people who disregard the posts, and then just write a comment that conforms to their preconception anyways.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 12:47 PM
1

I don't see how the title matches the article.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 12:14 PM
1

If you don't read the rules of the subreddit, you are going to get banned or otherwise moderated. For example, I have removed this post.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 11:25 AM
1

Rants belong in /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:50 PM
1

This is simply a rant. It belongs in /r/MensRants.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:33 PM
2

Your account is shadowbanned, dude. No one ever sees anything you post.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:20 PM
1

There wasn't any ripping apart that I saw. I have removed your post.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:31 PM
39

This is pandering to the populace, who have been fed the feminism line for so long. The problem is feminist influence. If it wasn't so strong, he wouldn't be saying such things.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:26 PM
2

I did remove it.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:33 PM
6

This has nothing to do with men's rights. What the fuck is wrong with you? You are epitomizing accusations that people here want to take rights away from women. You don't like it? Then don't support it. But get it the fuck off this subreddit. Argue on feminist subreddits or whatever other group is supporting it.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:47 PM
1

You sound like a scientologist denying psychology and psychiatry. Good job! Gaslighting is a thing, you just have decided to stick your head in the sand so that you don't have to confront emotional issues. The prevalence for it is up for debate, the existence of it is not.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 04:49 PM
8

No, we won't blame feminism for it. This is a ridiculous post that should be removed. It is people trying to troll for attention.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 01:03 AM
1

It is a win-win for feminists. If it does well, they get to show women being successful leads. If it does poorly, they get to point at another sign of misogyny in our society. When your point of view is reinforced no matter what the outcome of a "test", then you know you are believing in a religion rather than reality.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 11:36 AM
2

This is fake.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 04:45 AM
1

Your ignorance of the issues faced by men are no less profound than ignorance of the issues faced by women. This isn't a pissing match, a penis size comparison, or anything else. As long as you both are trying to compare the experiences of men and women, you will both be seen as trying to invalidate the experiences of the other to push for your own agendas. In the gender debates, two things must happen: When someone presents an issue as significant, it should be critically examined to see whethe…
/r/MensRights02/03/16 02:45 PM
2

This is a joke. It is not meant to be serious, and it certainly doesn't interfere with men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:54 PM
2

The story has been followed for a while on this sub, so we are letting this through as a follow up.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:29 PM
3

Why not just take pictures of your genitalia and send them to each other, because clearly this pissing match isn't going anywhere. Next time you are annoyed with someone, try ending your participation in the conversation rather than calling for some authority figure to step in and exert control over your opponent. You call THEM a feminist, and yet you use the feminist #1 tactic?
/r/MensRights25/02/16 11:15 AM
5

Read the tables. The most severe kinds are reported twice as frequently. It isn't an order of magnitude difference. Besides, the major argument in DV debates is that the psychological effect of violence is a significant problem that should be resolved regardless of the severity of the violence. More severe violence simply means that police should/need to be involved.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:02 AM
15

The funny part of this is that (logical) feminists will have to either: 1) Admit that domestic violence is experienced in roughly equal numbers by both genders. 2) Admit that self reporting is unreliable, and we can't trust people's word. But I suspect that nothing will change.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:27 PM
7

It depends how they collected the data. If they did a representative survey and found X% of men and Y% of women, then those values would have an uncertainty associated with the extrapolation to the whole province. With that uncertainty, you can perform what is called a t-test to determine if the numbers are statistically equivalent or not. While it says that it is "reported being victims of spousal violence", they could have still performed some kind of extrapolation. One would have to examine t…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:25 PM
1

If you can't understand satire, you should let other people do the posting.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 03:38 AM
–

The "hitting" occurred in the dream. This is not an issue of rights.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 01:43 AM
1

Thanks for your opinion, but it isn't relevant here. If you want to talk about the actual views of the subreddit rather than making things up, it might be relevant.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 01:40 PM
1

This is not relevant to this sub.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 02:15 PM
–

People have reported this video several times. I watched part of it and saw nothing wrong with it - it was akin to ShoeOnHead's retort to the Buzzfeed video. Never-the-less, the comments are insightfully critical of the video, which is sufficient to determine that open and free discourse is taking place. People are not hurt by the presence of a video that is heavily criticized for its flaws.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 10:43 AM
1

Yes. Read the rest of my comment rather than focusing on that line.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 12:36 AM
2

I wouldn't be surprised if those stories are embellished or outright fabrications. I am sure he has done some shady things, but I don't know if he is or isn't a rapist. That should be up to a court of law to decide. I can take the things he has said with enough sincerity to dislike the guy, want nothing to do with him, and want police to investigate his actions. But I will not take justice into my own hands and call him a rapist.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:05 PM
1

It isn't a mistake, just a different point of view. :) I was assuming I made a mistake by acting after you had already dealt with it.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 07:55 PM
1

This is far enough off topic that it is worth deleting. I removed it before seeing your message, though. If it had been a link to a discussion about what happened, fine, but the laughing and pointing people on the side make it clear that this isn't about rights but about making fun at a person's expense.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 05:05 PM
0

If they do it because of his gender, it is relevant here.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 04:08 PM
1

Use np.reddit.com for cross links.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:38 PM
3

This isn't being done under pressure from feminists. We have been removing PUA/TRP material for years. This is just a reminder. People don't post News on /r/Politics. People don't post cute pictures of cats on /r/WTF. And people don't post PUA/TRP material on /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:27 PM
1

I am jumping on the "if we don't get ahead of this, it is going to consume the subreddit because we already have ~40 posts about it in 3 hours" bandwagon. My responsibility is to the subreddit. Alternatively, I don't support the "enemy of my enemy is my friend" approach. It just doesn't work in politics.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:40 AM
-1

We complain about them not being critical of each other, why should we be so hypocritical as to join them in that fault?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:55 AM
1

Please resubmit this using np.reddit.com.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 11:32 PM
2

So correct them.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 11:20 AM
1

You of all people should know how ridiculous that statement is.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 11:19 AM
1

You are completely free to discuss definitions of rape that focus on equal agency and accountability. No one is stopping you from doing that. Posts aren't removed simply because they mention Roosh. They are removed if they are about his stupid antics, which are something that have nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 12:19 AM
1

But they aren't doing it because they are men. Opposing and taking action against Roosh and his followers is no different than acting against feminists.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 04:59 PM
1

Just because you say it, doesn't make it true. Proof that you are wrong is that you aren't silenced/banned/removed. It is as simple as that. We leave up lots of things that we disagree with. More than that, the moderators here vary in political views from left to right, and are certainly not uniform. But thanks for coming out and clearly showing how crazy you are.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 02:14 PM
0

I believe in people's right to communicate. But I am not going to be blind to the reason why this is happening. This is because of his views, not because of his gender. We have action opportunities frequently about some ignorant person saying something stupid, and we want there to be consequences for that action. How is this any different?
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:06 PM
2

Probably just a regular spammer. We get this kind of stuff on occasion. It is folly to blame someone without evidence.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 12:12 PM
2

Working on it.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 12:09 PM
9

You are pulling the old feminist trick. "The people doing this are men, therefore this is an attack on men." No, this isn't an attack on men. This is an attack on their ideology. That is a perfectly legitimate thing to attack, and no one's rights are being infringed upon because they are men.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:50 AM
5

He has the same right to speak that anyone else has. But right to speak is not the same as consequence-free-speech. He says things that piss people off and they are going to react.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:46 AM
5

This is the same bullshit argument that feminists make. "This attack on feminism is an attack on women!" == "This attack on a PUA is an attack on men!" No, it isn't. It isn't because they are MEN that they are being attacked, it is because they have said some really fucked up things, and now there are consequences for that. They are like little children who slapped a bully and then run whining to the teacher when the bully reacts.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:46 AM
4

If we "kept debate open" to all topics, then this wouldn't be a topical subreddit. It would be a general subreddit. We have a mandate to maintain the topical nature of the subreddit, and anything that is irrelevant to that topic gets removed. Why is this acceptable? Because there exist other places on Reddit that a person can go to discuss these things. It isn't silencing them, or censoring them, it is telling them that there is a different location to have that conversation.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:44 AM
2

If it has to do with men's rights, it is welcome here. If it is reporting on what is happening to Roosh, then it isn't an issue of men's rights. It is an issue of "what is happening to one guy somewhere in the world, who happens to have pissed people off and is now whining about the consequences of his speech."
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:43 AM
10

Trans and gay men are underrepresented because they are a small percentage of the population, and tend to congregate in their own groups. The MRM recognizes and includes trans and gay men's rights as human rights, just as they recognize women and lesbians. Basically, the MRM recognizes basic human rights for all people, regardless of gender, orientation, etc. This is contrary to feminists who differentiate the rights of women from the rights of men.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:42 AM
3

His individual rights are not being stepped on.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:40 AM
1

A.k.a: GRAH! I don't read much on this subreddit, but I think my uninformed opinion counts! I simply focus on the specific things I dislike and ignore all the things that I do like, because I am a pessimistic person and like to have my biases confirmed! GRAH!
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:08 AM
–

Normally we don't remove things that reach high amounts of votes. In this case, this content is not relevant to the subreddit to the point where it does not get that treatment. There is nothing redeeming in this discussion. No argument is made. No evidence is provided. It is just a rant from some unknown person on the internet.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 06:18 PM
2

The gender sentencing gap is larger than the race sentencing gap.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 05:17 PM
1

Not relevant here. I have removed it.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 07:14 PM
0

You are asserting that this would be "rape", not actually noting it. This is the kind of demagogic arguments that feminists make, and it doesn't enhance the subreddit or the dialogue on gender rights. When there is actual discrimination, or something with an actual affect on men, then post it.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 06:17 PM
1

This has been posted more than enough times. FFS, stop karma farming.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 09:27 PM
1

This is not relevant here.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 02:56 PM
3

I agree with you. But if you want to argue your points with them, you first have to overcome that obstacle before you do anything else. And the more you argue against their "institutional power" ideology, the more they bunker down and hold fast to it. This is why many people here view feminism as more of a religion than a philosophy - its proponents are unwaiveringly dedicated.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 01:32 PM
0

I have removed this post. The title is a highly editorialized version of the article posted.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:38 PM
3

Yeah, you have a good point. The presence of one idiot's ramblings on a subreddit of over a hundred thousand subscribers, where the policy maintains a firm support of free speech CLEARLY indicates that the entirety of the subreddit is misogynistic. If we are lumped in to that misogynistic accusation, then you are, too. Congratulations on calling yourself a misogynist.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:36 PM
3

Your first argument isn't effective against opponents to this argument because they claim that racism and sexism require institutional power. Thus, anything that selectively benefits a group deemed as disadvantaged, or opposes a group deemed as advantaged, can never possibly be seen as racist.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:33 PM
1

Well, it is a pretty funny publicity stunt that makes an interesting point. Unfortunately, I can imagine it is going to fall on deaf ears.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:31 PM
1

I have removed this. Search for "stiletto" on this subreddit and you will find more than enough articles posted about the situation. We do not want a single topic to dominate the entire subreddit.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 05:09 PM
1

It is not the place of this subreddit to discuss whether something is a false accusation. We note that it exists, and when it is proven then it is worthy of being on this subreddit. But your accusations and claims are no more noteworthy than someone's accusations of rape. When a crime occurs, police should investigate, not individual people.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 05:08 PM
1

When the sentence comes in low for fraud sentences, then this will be an issue here. Until then, it isn't anything worthy of note. Women behave badly all the time - the only relevance to this sub is when that bad behaviour is treated differently than men's.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 02:20 AM
1

This is ridiculous. ee4m is right, you clearly don't understand the argument you posted. I have removed this post.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 08:37 PM
1

This isn't an issue of men's rights. SJWs exist with a wide variety of ideologies and perspectives, including MRA views.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 06:26 PM
4

The accusation occurred when she was a minor. They can't charge her as an adult for behaviour that occurred as a minor. This is a difficult situation all around.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 11:58 AM
1

To be fair to the system, there was evidence of sexual activity. For a child that young to be sexually active, it is not unreasonable for authority to assume it was an adult taking advantage of the kid. The girl said she became sexually active in second grade? It is unlikely that a boy would be able to be sexually active in second grade, so unless she was receiving digital penetration from boys her own age, something bad happened to her. Just because a person recants their story, doesn't mean th…
/r/MensRights19/01/16 11:57 AM
7

Toxicity in behaviour crosses the gender boundaries. I use the term toxicity in reference to behaviour to refer to behaviours that directly negatively influence the mood/happiness of others. Both males and females engage in toxic, bullying behaviour, and both of them do so as part of gender role enforcement. More importantly, it often follows economics more than gender - the poorest and the wealthiest are often the biggest bullies, regardless of gender. But they bully in different ways. The poor…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 04:29 PM
11

If more people got on board, got off their asses, and did these things, we could make an even bigger impact. Thanks for all your hard work putting together the action opportunities.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:36 PM
5

Some users want more cooperation.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 08:10 PM
10

There is a reason that this subreddit has never partnered with /r/TheRedPill, or other PUA groups, and a reason why PUA material is not relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 02:06 PM
1

a) This has been posted before. b) There is no relevance to men's rights. This is simply "look at what this woman did". Her and her ex-husband were treated fairly under the law, supposedly.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 02:26 PM
1

I have no desire to turn this into a feminist subreddit. Your kind of manipulative word play is not going to fly here.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 02:22 PM
1

Once again you have a highly editorialized title on something that, while it affects men, doesn't actually address men's rights. The video was gender neutral.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:19 PM
-1

We don't ban the extremists and the crazies.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 05:56 PM
0

Scientologists argue the same point. No one said the whole world was sane.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 05:41 PM
2

Medical professionals typically have a responsibility to report people they think are a risk to harming others or themselves. Whether that responsibility is misused/misapplied due to ideological hysteria is another issue.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 05:41 PM
2

Are you serious - your account is shadowbanned? How long has it been shadowbanned? If it is recent, I guess the admins went back on their promise not to use shadowbanning for non-bots.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 05:34 PM
-1

This is a political issue, not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 11:13 AM
1

See our sidebar about posting rules here. (We won't ban you, but we do remove posts that don't fit our criteria.)
/r/MensRights10/01/16 11:09 AM
1

It is. But we approve it.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 12:47 AM
3

This has been posted several times.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 11:52 PM
11

This bullshit isn't relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 08:55 PM
2

This is a bullshit post. I have removed it.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 04:57 PM
2

Anti-feminism that relates to men's rights is part of men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 10:59 AM
1

This isn't related to men's rights.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:42 AM
5

I recommend sending messages to reddit.com in the private message system to contact the admins to let them know about it. It doesn't hurt.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 05:20 PM
1

You seem to suggest that this is accidental. It is not. This is a purposeful act, because conflating the issues allows them to malign the MRM, which is their stated goal.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 06:21 PM
1

The article does not support the title.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:01 PM
1

This is the most click-bait-y title ever!
/r/MensRights05/01/16 02:58 PM
-4

Take this kind of material to /r/TheRedPill or somewhere else. It isn't about rights, it is just whining.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 06:44 PM
-2

This is purely anti-feminist and doesn't address men's rights. Moreover, it is not clear that there is "truth in the comments", but rather another person's opinion in the comments in a series of arguments. The title is highly editorialized.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 02:56 AM
1

From what I could see, this was the act of a female, not to be confused with a feminist. The words are distinct.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 02:53 AM
1

That is speculation and certainly situationally dependent. The bigger issue you are getting at is that being told something is situationally and contextually dependent. It does not occur in a bubble. It is just as possible that girls are being told not to be bossy because some are behaving in a way that is bossy beyond the social norm, as it is that they are being told not to be bossy because of the genitalia they have.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 01:15 PM
2

I have removed this post for being blatantly misleading. False rape accusations are a serious issue, and not one that will be resolved by making ridiculous claims that are not defensible.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 06:43 PM
7

The title is misleading, because the hours worked is not divided by the number of people in the workforce. This does not say that the average man spends 28% more time at work, simply that men do 28% more paid labour than women do.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:14 AM
1

Your title shows clear misinformation regarding the page it links to. I have removed this post.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 03:12 PM
2

While there is significant discussion going on here, this post is being portrayed as serious when it is in fact of a satire source. That misinformation is why I have removed this post.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:32 PM
2

I agree that social assistance shouldn't be a way of life. That being said, the child is not being helped by this situation. It isn't a good solution to any problem. The father is being screwed because the money isn't making the child's life better. The mother is being screwed because she is continuing to have insufficient funds to overcome the barrier to re-enter the workforce. The child is screwed because it is forced to live below the poverty level, with all of the child developmental problem…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 02:11 AM
2

If you don't know what you are talking about, shut up. This is, in fact, bad for all people, especially the kids. The way it works is that a parent (male or female) on social assistance doesn't actually receive ANY child support. The province has decided that anyone on social assistance has to live at a certain income level, and can never live above that. Child support from the paying parent is deducted from the income of the receiving parent.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 07:48 PM
1

First off, reporting the person you are arguing with because they have a different opinion than you is petty bullshit. How childish you must be to want to call in an authority figure to silence your opponent. Clearly your worldview is so fragile that you can't handle someone with a different opinion. Secondly, you are either a troll or an extremely ignorant individual. Based on your comments, it is hard to tell. I am not going to say climate science is perfect, but all of your claims about it ar…
/r/MensRights24/12/15 10:13 PM
0

This isn't an issue of men's rights, it is an issue of women's rights. Moreover, it seems more like a copyright issue - the courts are determining ownership over her appearance in the video, rather than her consent.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 11:18 AM
1

I have removed this post. Take your anti-woman posts to /r/TheRedPill.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:27 PM
1

Depends on the ways that you treat them differently. The world isn't black and white, dude.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:23 PM
1

There are several points people have here, but not all of them are victimhood. The main one in the MRM is that it is hypocritical for the double standard to be so supported in our culture. That doesn't make men victims. It identifies that there still exists gender roles that feminists aren't doing anything about.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 03:32 PM
0

If you want to just slander the subreddit, you can find somewhere else to do it.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 11:21 AM
1

HBD is not a scientific term. I believe that this post belongs in the /r/TheRedPill subreddit.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 03:55 AM
2

Okay. At some point you need to realize when conversations lose their productivity. Once they hit that point, you are just wasting your time and peace of mind by replying. Save yourself a lot of grief and annoyance by just letting it go. :) FYI, you may like my reply to the person you were arguing with. It is several comments up.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 08:35 PM
1

See our sidebar. This post is not relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 08:33 PM
10

It is silly to allow people to get away with derailing the conversation. As long as they can switch the conversation to it being "not the same thing", the discussion isn't about how a child shouldn't be non-medically mutilated, regardless of whether it is the same as something else. They don't need to be the same thing for them both to be wrong.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 06:06 PM
2

It would be nice to have that wall of links available as an accessible text, rather than having to copy-paste each link. Any ideas?
/r/MensRights20/12/15 05:27 PM
1

Out of curiosity, are you for or against the general sentiment of this subreddit? The person you are replying to is against the general sentiment of this subreddit. So it would be hilarious if you were, also. It would mean that you are both arguing because you assume the other person to support this subreddit, but are actually approaching the issues from roughly the same frame of mind. (A classic case of cognitive bias, where your perception of the other person is overwhelming your ability to se…
/r/MensRights20/12/15 01:13 PM
4

The general attitude of this subreddit is not that men are discriminated against more than women, per-say, it is that discrimination against men is often either overlooked, ignored or socially accepted in our society. There is much effort to end discrimination against women, but very little going into ending discrimination against men, and it is harming our society. It is alienating fathers from wanting to become parents, it is creating animosity between genders, and it is propagating gender rol…
/r/MensRights20/12/15 01:09 PM
2

This has nothing to do with people's rights.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 10:21 PM
2

I am going to give you the benefit if the doubt that you aren't a troll. None-the-less, I have removed this post for being off topic. Perhaps you should take it to /r/TheRedPill or /r/MensRants?
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:56 PM
0

That sounds completely irrelevant to the discussion.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:55 PM
0

We have already removed other articles on this situation. Based on the description of the allegations, those are legitimate allegations of harassment. Just because he was falsely accused of rape, doesn't mean he is a saint. We will have to see how the court case plays out before we can ascertain whether he is being falsely accused again.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:41 PM
1

Yes. We are a movement, not an organization. AVFM is an organization. Honey Badgers are an organization. Etc. But outside of the people that are part of those organizations, the actions of the organization do not reflect on any individual who does not explicitly support them. That statement should be true for feminists as well. Though, to be fair, people in the MRM regularly attribute all feminists as supporting the actions of all feminist organizations/public figures.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:39 PM
6

This is a pretty interesting debate... Does controversy and extremism pave the way for more reasoned positions? Hell, that argument could even be applied to the current Muslim debates that are going on. As a moderator of /r/MensRights, I have noticed a significant subscriber spike every single time there is a highly controversial situation. Whenever AVFM does a stunt, we get a subscriber spike. When Elliot Rodgers happened, we got a subscriber spike. Every single time. I would argue that the att…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:36 PM
1

If you have occasional bad situations, you are occasionally running into bad people. If you consistently have bad situations, it is time to stop what you are doing and look internally to find out why this keeps happening. You aren't responsible for people doing bad things to you. But if you want to stop bad things from happening, you need to look for solutions on how to avoid getting into those situations in the first place. Rule 1 of being an adult.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:24 PM
1

That isn't a knifing threat.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 05:52 PM
1

I have removed this post. It isn't productive. The post you linked to has been removed and the OP of it has been banned. This situation has been dealt with. Thank you for being vigilant about these issues - it is very important, and with everyone's busy lives, it is too easy to just accept what we read.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:23 PM
6

The sad thing is that it takes so long for this kind of stuff to get dealt with in the courts, and TyphonBlue is getting screwed in the meantime. From what I understand, it was her business that was most affected by what happened.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:21 PM
2

Your gender is irrelevant. You should have checked your privilege before making that statement, btw.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:11 PM
5

I wish I could sticky this comment. It deserves to be at the top.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:10 PM
1

That is not a common thing in the MRM. Seems to be simply for this poster/image.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 02:42 PM
5

I believe that Karen has received that many emails. But I would love to see feminists challenge her on that. Why? Because then it is easy enough to say, "Wait, are you saying that women might possibly lie about something?"
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:40 AM
1

/u/girlwriteswhat Thanks! I appreciate it. Very well written, very thorough. I especially like the part on the symbols for toxic femininity. Apparently "toxic masculinity" is an acceptable phrase but toxic femininity isn't? WTF!
/r/MensRights15/12/15 08:18 PM
1

That's nice. That isn't what the comic is about, though.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 05:16 PM
1

I wouldn't say beauty is a man's possession, but the traditional view is that man seek to acquire beauty in their life and women seek to be that beauty.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 12:23 PM
1

Please review the rules of our subreddit before posting. I have removed this.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 12:21 PM
0

This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 12:19 PM
1

This isn't relevant to this subreddit. Maybe take it to /r/MensRightsMeta?
/r/MensRights15/12/15 12:16 PM
2

To be fair, it was a pretty dumb list.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:17 PM
1

This is a human rights topic, not a men's rights topic. There are more appropriate subs for this.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:14 PM
1

This has been posted an umpteenth number of times. While it may be new for you, it exists in many places on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 07:20 PM
0

Extremism comes in many forms. You are just one end of a spectrum.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 03:22 PM
0

reductio ad absurdum
/r/MensRights13/12/15 03:22 PM
0

Keep digging your hole.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 02:41 PM
1

There are many ways that people's basic rights are denied in the interest of public security. This is a normal part of society. When an allegation has been made, authorities need to investigate, and the people involved have some of their rights suspended to prevent interference with that investigation. This is not something that is ever going to change, nor should it. We should not be promoting a society in which the accused can interfere with an investigation. We should be promoting a society i…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 02:41 PM
2

Clearly you are ignorant of how investigations work. If you are pulled over by the cops for a suspected DUI, you are being treated differently. Under your argument, we should all be responding with "How dare they treat us differently by pulling us over! That is treating us as guilty until proven innocent! We should be allowed to keep driving until they prove that we are intoxicated!" If you can't see how ridiculous that argument is yet, you are too far gone.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 02:04 PM
2

Good. Those aren't bad addictions, really. Keeping your mind off of things is important. Stay strong. Good luck. You have 120k supporters here.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:48 PM
-2

No. It is part of the investigation procedure to determine if someone is guilty. It isn't cool, it isn't fair, but let's not call it something it isn't.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:46 PM
2

If you are trying to bring up flaws in someone's reasoning, shouldn't you actually understand their reasoning rather than mischaracterizing it? You have essentially admitted to strawmanning your opponent.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 03:12 AM
2

There is nothing here about how she is being treated differently than a man would be. There is no rights issue going on.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:21 AM
2

While this has gotten a lot of attention, the post was a troll post. And that means this discussion is not worth while. For those who are busy and don't have time to find out for themselves that it is a troll post, this post just furthers the troll's goals.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:17 AM
6

Not to disagree with you, but I want to nitpick a point. They are claiming that girls are told not to be bossy but boys aren't. They aren't saying specifically that people should not correct behaviour. They are ignoring the gender role expectations of boys, and focusing on eliminating gender role expectations for girls. Either a behaviour is universally expected, or it shouldn't be expected at all. That is their argument.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 06:46 PM
11

Maybe you have had different experiences than me. But anger from men is interpreted as scary. Women have told me that male anger makes them scared for their safety (referring to other people).
/r/MensRights12/12/15 06:45 PM
40

The perfect counterpart to women being told "don't be so bossy" is the concern about men being angry. It is only socially acceptable for women to be angry.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:27 PM
8

This is a ridiculous argument. The issue isn't that women aren't in control, the issue is that society views sex as something men do to women.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:25 PM
2

I have removed this. This isn't an issue of men's rights, and either you are a poe troll or else you are just a severely skewed individual.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:24 PM
7

Some of the list I agree with, but other parts seem pretty redpill-ish.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:21 PM
1

Male-on-male violence has always been handled by the police. Obviously you can go to the police and file assault and battery charges.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 05:15 PM
1

Please see our sidebar rules about posting to other subreddits.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 09:32 AM
4

I would love to get a transcript of Karen's portion of the video. /u/girlwriteswhat any chance of supplying a transcript?
/r/MensRights11/12/15 09:29 AM
1

I concur. No relevance here. I have removed it.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:03 PM
1

This isn't about men's rights. Perhaps take it to /r/TheRedPill?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:03 PM
4

If you want to understand the reasoning within feminism, you need to start with feminist philosophy. This will allow you to read overviews of the major ideas without getting caught up in the nuances and bad arguments of specific authors. I recommend reading this: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/ http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-power/ http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-topics/ http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-political/ Of note, it was from reading f…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:03 PM
1

All cogent arguments for being an actual misogynist rather than a men's rights activist. Good job.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:40 AM
1

Irrelevant to the subreddit.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:21 PM
2

If you make too much sense, you will ruin the OPs rant...
/r/MensRights07/12/15 04:05 PM
7

You read the OPs post and that is all that indicated that the OP was naive and over simplifying a complicated situation?
/r/MensRights07/12/15 04:04 PM
-4

I am not going to wish you good luck, since I don't really believe in luck. Instead, I am going to say: I hope you did your research, and I hope you make good arguments. If not, you are just going to misrepresent the men's rights movement, and get a poor grade in your class.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:59 PM
13

These arguments would be absolutely HORRIBLE to use in class. You are directly attacking women, instead of undermining feminism.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 12:58 PM
1

Maybe there is some relationship. Find someone who goes into those details and post their video.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 07:41 PM
1

This is a politics post, not a men's rights post.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 06:56 PM
6

She wasn't right to hit you, but it sounds like you both have incredibly unhealthy and harmful behaviours in your relationship. Obviously if you want to proceed with legal action against your partner, you should call a lawyer and file a police report for assault. Police and legal action are not the solution to every situation, though, and you should judge what you think is the appropriate response. Are you doing this for revenge for your harmed pride or are you doing it because you feel scared o…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 02:10 PM
6

I am going to try to put this together in a more structured form. 1959 - Sex-role pressures and the socialization of the male child is published. Author notes the following: Changes in women's social roles without similar changes in male social roles is leading to anxiety, inadequacy, and hostility among boys. Boys have a greater delinquency rate, and greater underachievement rate, relative to girls. "Social roles" are defined as personal qualities, behavioural characteristics, interests, attitu…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 01:49 PM
5

You need to provide citations otherwise this can't be taken as anything more than opinion.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 01:20 PM
1

Your use of [misandry] is not a flair. You can resubmit this article, with proper flair, and a less click-bait title.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:32 PM
2

Since we did react to it, by giving it the flair "Misleading", you are obviously making as fabricated a title as the post you are complaining about! That is quite hypocritical of you. FYI, we have a meta subreddit to discuss meta issues. I have removed this thread.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:30 PM
1

Moderator decisions on other subreddits are not relevant here.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:28 PM
14

I will speak as a moderator here, and try to be more "official" in my response. First of all, many things get attributed to the men's rights movement that shouldn't be associated with it. Feminists will attribute anything said by a non-feminist to the men's rights movement, and this is primarily because the world is black-and-white to their point of view. Anything non-feminist is misogyny, and thus free to be lumped together. Look at what happened with Elliot Rogers - the guy clearly had nothing…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:56 PM
2

Feminism is just traditionalism wrapped up in a new package.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 02:50 PM
0

I have removed this article, as the title is clearly misleading. Based on the explicit text in the article, it seems clear that this was posted with intent to mislead.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 03:27 PM
-1

It's almost like there is more than one person behind the "Media". Weird!
/r/MensRights03/12/15 11:30 PM
10

Just because someone writes something on the internet, does not make it journalism.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:46 PM
-1

Clearly there are opposing sides to this. Some people want equal responsibilities from men/women, others want men and women to be separate. Obviously you are from the latter.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 10:44 PM
2

Can you re-add the paragraph breaks to make the wall of text readable?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:22 AM
1

You have a very confusing use of pronouns. You may want to go back and make your writing more clear.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:18 AM
0

I actually pressed the spam button. If you aren't going to read the sidebar and follow the rules of the subreddit, your posts are going to be removed.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:13 AM
1

Great comment. I really like the ideas you have presented. Good summaries. (I wish there was more cited support so that it could be shown to dissenters, but as someone steeped in the literature, I am familiar enough with the evidence to agree with you.)
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:08 AM
3

If you want to write a paper that doesn't come off as anti-woman, you first have to make it clear that feminism is an ideology, while women are a gender. Being anti-feminist, or criticizing feminism, is no different than criticizing any other ideology - from Christianity to Islam to Conservatism to Communism. All of these are ideologies that are predicated on axiomatic (unproven) beliefs. They make the statement, "IF our axioms are true, then everything that follows must also be true." It is per…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:04 AM
1

Do you view with CSS off?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 01:47 AM
1

That is a completely different issue. But I don't think labels help, personally.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 12:11 AM
1

Maybe, but just remember you aren't the only one who uses the sub. :)
/r/MensRights03/12/15 12:11 AM
1

Well, we just changed the sidebar. We were struggling for space in it, but with the new changes then it has lots more room. We can definitely add it to the Wiki page on external links/organizations!
/r/MensRights02/12/15 09:02 PM
1

My own experience with feminist family members is statements like, "I don't want to talk to you. You have all kinds of numbers, and I don't know enough to refute them." In other words, they reject the statistics on grounds that they don't want to listen to them, and then refuse further discussion in order to maintain their worldview (avoid cognitive dissonance). So yeah... sometimes you just have to move on.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 10:14 AM
1

/r/MensRightsLinks, too
/r/MensRights02/12/15 10:12 AM
3

Under the new rules of Reddit, what you said would be considered a call for a witch hunt (or a gathered call to action against someone that the Reddit admins approve of, since that is how the rule is applied). I have removed it.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 03:17 AM
3

Well, this comment was just removed from this subreddit. Look - if you don't follow the rules of the subreddit, you are going to have mods take action against you. It is no secret that the /r/feminism mods are happy with the banhammer. This isn't relevant information for this subreddit. Read our sidebar before posting.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 08:02 PM
-2

Because it conforms to his world view to 'know' that.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 12:48 PM
1

This is a clickbait article. Their goal is to be provocative to get clicks. This isn't representative of society.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 08:24 PM
1

This is ridiculous. A male feminist accused of rape means nothing more than a male non-feminist accused of rape. Extrapolating from rare cases to the general is the most ridiculous form of leap-logic possible.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:07 PM
1

I think it is number 3 on the sidebar rules section. We don't allow posts about banning in other subs.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 04:35 AM
1

Well, if you read the /r/feminism sidebar before posting there, and followed their rules, you wouldn't be banned. "I saw a 'stop' sign and decided to ignore it, and my car got hit." isn't something you should be sharing.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:53 AM
1

/r/MensRants
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:46 AM
1

Read our sidebar before posting.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:36 AM
1

Why do people have a hard time reading the sidebar? Been getting these "I was banned" messages posted every day for a while now. Read the sidebar before posting and people won't ban you. Here, we have a lax ban policy, but that doesn't mean this is a relevant post for this subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:36 AM
2

This shit doesn't belong here. If you continue to post things like this, your welcome will be rescinded.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 11:09 PM
1

It had to do with you not reading the rules of a subreddit before posting there.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 11:33 AM
7

Yeah, you are an idiot. It is already an important part of the men's rights movement. If you haven't experienced such a situation, then maybe you should shut the fuck up about other people's experiences.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 01:48 AM
2

Please read our sidebar before posting here. Clearly you didn't read the rules of /r/Feminism nor have you read the rules of /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 07:07 PM
2

The person you replied to is manipulating the outcome of the papers that he/she is referring to. It isn't 70% of all domestic violence, it is 70% of non-reciprocal domestic violence. And about half of all domestic violence is non-reciprocal.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:44 PM
2

While this is reported on Breitbart, I suspect they will be retracting it soon. This is pretty likely a fake meant to discredit Bahar. While I have no favour for the person, I don't think this is really relevant to the subreddit.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 04:20 PM
-2

I am not trying to appease feminists. I am recognizing the truth that part of this is a PR game. And if we give them easy ammo against us, we lose that game. I am not telling people to temper their criticisms, I am telling them to make effective criticisms.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 08:41 PM
1

There are conspiracy theory subs. Take your conspiracy theory to an appropriate place.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 04:31 PM
1

I have removed this due to the misleading title. This is not a forum for many mothers with that view, but rather a single posting on that topic.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 04:29 PM
-23

Yeah, any kind of statement like that is going to be counter productive. Why? Because it is very easily turned into: "See, these people promote rape because they oppose women's right to consent!" If you disagree with policies promoted by feminists, attack the problems with the policies. Don't whine about the perceived outcomes. FFS, don't be stupid.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 04:16 PM
0

The comic has already been posted, as has the public service announcement image. Putting them into a blog post doesn't make this new content. It is just blog spam.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 02:36 PM
1

You are correct, this is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:06 PM
4

Satire is a difficult thing these days. a) Some people are really, really bad at satire. And if you are bad at satire, you are just insulting without making a point. You should try to be conscientious about this. If your goal wasn't to insult people, maybe you were just bad at your satire? Satire requires an actual point. What was your point? From your post here, you seemed to be poking fun at something without actually having a point in the first place. That would suggest you were, in fact, mak…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 02:41 PM
0

This sub will not be pulled into the latest Islam-hysteria. This isn't about men's rights, and it is not relevant here.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 08:17 PM
3

You said you did research into the MRM, and you can't even name the issues that it is concerned with?
/r/MensRights18/11/15 09:21 AM
3

So what are the issues that the MRM are concerned with?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 09:47 PM
3

You claim to have done research on the MRM. The fact that you are one of the few feminists who uses the acronyms correctly is promising. In your opinion, what are the issues that the MRM is concerned with?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:17 PM
1

This is our subreddit. You don't get to make the rules. You get to choose whether you participate or not.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:14 PM
2

a) It is quite possible that GoHoMoThrow is a false flag. They have been very vocally abrasive, and many people here in the past like that have turned out to be people who oppose the subreddit and are trying to make it look bad. The moderators, however, err on the side of caution when banning people. We have been watching the account, but it hasn't done anything ban worthy. b) No one here has tried to silence you, and the mere act of making such an accusation identifies you are being disingenuou…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:13 PM
4

That is a pretty interesting description. I think I will use it in the future. That being said, we should all be aware that there are some in the MRM that behave this way. If we want to avoid becoming that which we rail against, we should be cognizant of that behaviour among ourselves and work to push it out.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:00 PM
-1

This thread should have been removed, but the mods did not see it before it became a big issue. As per our subreddit policy, posts about banning by other mods is not relevant to the subreddit. It is an issue of pure inter-subreddit drama. This has nothing to do with men's rights, simply the inability of people to read and obey the rules of other subreddits. In the interest of not silencing the discussion that has occurred, we will be leaving this thread up, but future similar threads will be rem…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:46 AM
1

Your shit isn't welcome here. This topic isn't even remotely relevant to this subreddit, and you know it.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 06:09 PM
1

That is a pretty ridiculous statement. If you assert that after having read Karen's message, you are as ignorant as the CBC.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 01:58 AM
1

This is not relevant to this subreddit. If you continue to post irrelevant material, you will be treated as a spammer.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:25 AM
-1

This really don't have anything to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:56 PM
6

"Everything that I disagree with is feminist." Clearly a strong argument you are using there.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 03:10 PM
1

This isn't a men's rights issue. This is an issue for /r/politics or something like that.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:35 PM
-1

Justification is in the eye of the beholder. Your argument isn't valid.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:34 PM
0

Wow. This thread is incredibly disturbing. What is wrong with you people? People bitch and complain when feminists try to get men fired, and it seems few people here have learned the lessons from those experiences. Anyone advocating for this is no better than any given feminist. You should be ashamed.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:10 PM
1

Contains personal information.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 11:29 AM
0

Try /r/parentingadvice or something similar. That is a more appropriate sub for your question.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:06 AM
5

You need to understand the political climate in Canada. The NDP are making headway in becoming a major party. They won the election in Alberta, the most conservative of all provinces, and they were the official opposition in the previous government. Trudeau isn't fighting against the Conservatives, he is fighting against the NDP for votes. The swing votes, therefore, are feminist-leaning people. I agree that this is not good politics for the sake of the country, but it is a pretty sound politica…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 09:05 PM
20

NOTE: THIS STORY CANNOT BE CONFIRMED ON OTHER WEBSITES. THE WEBSITE LINKED IS CONSIDERED A TABLOID. Okay, it is showing up in other news sources. I tried Googling it and couldn't find anything. I guess my google-foo was weak today.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 07:57 PM
11

Oh good, there are some comments here before the bigots show up.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:12 PM
1

This isn't relevant here.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 09:57 PM
1

And your post has been removed from here. If you don't read the rules of a subreddit, then moderators have to step in. You bring this upon yourself, and it is certainly not a badge of honour. It is a nothing.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 04:13 PM
1

Learn history.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 05:11 AM
4

It all comes down to marketing.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 10:30 PM
1

As I said, take it over to a different sub. It isn't relevant here. If you want to rant about enforcing gender norms on women, you clearly don't understand the purpose of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 07:23 PM
1

This submission contains no content. It is a low effort post. I have removed it.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 07:22 PM
1

Perhaps you can take your rant about women over to /r/theredpill.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 02:35 PM
0

this is not relevant here
/r/MensRights27/10/15 11:49 AM
16

Remember how feminists used to state that men were the default gender in human? Now apparently they aren't even human at all?
/r/MensRights26/10/15 10:33 PM
0

How many academic feminists do you know? How many do you read? Or are you just familiar with popularized feminists? That is like judging science based on the behaviour of Bill Nye, Neil Degrass Tyson and Richard Dawkins. (And yes, I am aware that Bill Nye is an engineer, I chose him on purpose.) While many people and scientists support those three people, that doesn't mean that they represent science or scientists.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 10:21 PM
1

I didn't say it was a uniform distribution.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 10:19 PM
-3

Feminism != feminists. Certainly there are feminists who fit the bill of opportunistic (consciously or not) people who create a moral panic. But that isn't all of them. But feminists represent the full spectrum of humanity, like any other broad subset of the population. Don't attack feminism with stupid and silly assertions like this. Attack feminism based on the ideas you disagree with, not the actions of people who claim the title. Separate your criticisms into: 1. I dislike the actions of thi…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 07:52 PM
4

We don't control what people say. Thus, adherence to these standards are voluntary. Since some users from TRP also post in MR, we won't ever achieve this goal, but more attention to precise language can be helpful when arguing our points.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 04:46 PM
1

Feel free to review our posting guidelines before making another post here.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 06:50 PM
1

This isn't about rights or social issues, this is more of a red pill discussion. I recommend posting it there.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 06:42 PM
4

That is not what is meant by "free speech." The use of the term "free" describes the lack of someone preventing you from uttering the words.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 06:38 PM
17

I went back and forth on how this went. Regardless, Janice did a great job staying strong amid the heated situation. I was impressed that those who got to ask questions were all feminists. Clearly they are enjoying the privileges of free speech, even if they don't wish to share those privileges.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 02:32 PM
79

Yup, pretty stupid. I would have removed it since it isn't making any real point, just making fun. But I didn't catch it early enough and we have a policy about not removing things that have sufficient support unless they violate a more extreme policy than simply "non-content".
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:04 PM
1

You want something that doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 06:59 PM
1

Please see our sidebar for posting standards.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 01:54 PM
1

"True Statistics" is a completely impossible goal. That isn't the point of statistics gathering. "Representative Statistics" is the goal. True statistics would require knowing exactly what happened in every situation to every person. That is not possible.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:04 AM
1

People need to stop submitting this video. It has already been submitted many, many times over. I am removing any new submissions I see. Contribute to existing discussions on it or wait a while (months) before submitting again.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 03:35 PM
1

There are subreddits devoted to GamerGate issues. You should submit this there.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 06:59 PM
1

Obviously you know that this isn't relevant here. If you wish to spam the subreddit with material that isn't suited for this subreddit, you will have your welcome revoked.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 06:58 PM
2

No, it is true. We do remove everything the MHAcademy spammer posts stuff. He has spammed the subreddit for something like 8 years - copy-paste messages spammed everywhere - so he is on permanent ban from the admins, even. He has to create new YouTube accounts and use anonymous image hosters, and disguise his text with numbers and random spaces and such to try to fool the automated systems that block his messages (this is stuff the admins put in, not just the moderators). The guy has evidence of…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 12:37 AM
1

Well, considering your behaviour here has been in line with theirs in the past, I didn't see much of a difference. You keep fabricating things, over and over again. Quite obviously, too. I said that I would ban the person or otherwise take care of anyone who made death threats - that is incentive, is it not? Yet here you claim I offered no incentive. This is proof of you lying and fabricating aspects of our discussion in your responses. "Leave my team alone, don't say mean things about us", lol.…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 11:04 AM
5

Ah right. Today is "open season" on normally banned subs from SRS. You are trolling me. Well, good game. We each had some fun. But you showed your hand too early when you fabricated something I never even remotely said. Try harder next time.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 02:06 PM
14

and still no proof of death threats! Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner here. Claiming to receive death threats, but it is more important to her to make snarky replies to a moderator who can actually do something about the claimed death threats. I hope you have a nice day. :) Because you just made mine awesome.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 09:24 AM
16

If someone gives you death threats, you report it to the moderators (or admins). Since I haven't seen such things reported, I am inclined to not believe that it happened. Perhaps someone wished that you would die, but that is different from a death threat. Really, you make it clear that your opinions are fragile, since people disagreeing with you resulted in your edits. And you must attack those who disagree with you in order to maintain your fragile worldview. Congratulations.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 08:36 AM
3

Well, since that didn't actually happen, I won't take you seriously. There are feminists who post here, feminists who strongly disagree with the main discourse here, and we don't ban them. I see no reason why you would be different.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 08:32 AM
3

Good point, the fact that it is highly downvoted shouldn't be taken as evidence that the MRM is non-hostile to trans people. Go fuck yourself. The MRM isn't hostile to transpeople, we just don't censor opinions. So people who are hostile to transpeople voice their opinions, too. Back to what I said earlier, go fuck yourself. I am sick of this cherry-picking bullshit. The existence of on (or a few) negative comment towards towards a transperson is not evidence of an overall trend of negativity to…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 07:21 PM
47

Some idiot reported this and said: More SRS tranny agenda garbage. Where are the mods? I want to let them know - the mods are right here, the mods are fully aware of this, and this is completely relevant to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 07:16 PM
2

You don't seem to understand what you are saying... You are trying to assert that those words have some fixed meaning/definition, and that the definition you use is this universal one. If you want to discuss these issues with someone who uses different definitions, why not try explaining your use of the terms at the start? And when listening in on someone else's conversation, take into account that their usage/definition of the terms may be different than yours. If you have any intention on unde…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 05:49 PM
1

I have removed this. OP is clearly stretching and editorializing the situation for either karma or to create outrage.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 02:10 PM
14

Some people think that this is not a men's rights issue, but you have expressed exactly why it is. There is a stigma against men who don't have degrees - this is a continuation of men being valued only for what they can do. This is going to be a growing issue for men and women until "feminism" actually does something to address discrimination against men. Men are being beaten over the heads for their behaviours, for their different ways of learning, and then beaten over the heads again when they…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:25 PM
3

a) This has been posted many times. b) It is more appropriate for /r/funny or something like that. c) It isn't relevant to men's rights. It isn't even an attack on feminist ideology, it is simply an attack on people who behave a certain way.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 07:10 PM
3

We are fine with related subs advertising on /r/MensRights, but stickies are meant for specific MR stuff. While you and potentially a large portion of the userbase here might be interested in this new subreddit, it isn't directly related to men's rights. (And EvilPundit handles the stickies.)
/r/MensRights07/10/15 02:39 AM
1

See our sidebar.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:22 PM
1

See our sidebar about posts about bannings.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 10:01 AM
3

This is a legal issue, this is not a men's rights issue. It happened to a man, but it does not affect a large portion of men.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 04:01 PM
0

If only people read the sidebar of the subreddits they were submitting to. And if only they actually kept up with discussions on the topics they seem to be wanted to create outrage over.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 11:08 AM
0

It does seem like they had an inappropriate relationship. Clearly there is a vested interest in playing this off as acceptable, based on the voting. But it is quite possible that there was inappropriate behaviour going on, and that the relationship was heading towards somewhere worse. Some of the phrases and wording used describes pedophilia pretty well, especially the constant need to justify that the existing behaviour was innocent. The question is - why was there any existing behaviour? Cuddl…
/r/MensRights04/10/15 11:04 AM
2

Whelp, if you don't follow the rules of a subreddit, the moderators have to take actions. Take your post here for instance - you didn't bother to read our sidebar, and so now your post has been deleted.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 02:09 PM
1

We do ban behaviour. If you follow someone around for the purpose of insulting them, that is harassment. Otherwise, you are allowed to express your views however you want. Read our sidebar, and if you are still unsure, read our more in-depth mod policy - the link is in the sidebar also.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:20 PM
1

I am sick of language policing. We are very clear that we do not police people based on language or opinion. We aren't feminists, and feminist policies have no power or sway here. Furthermore, I see no reason why a person should get to hide behind anonymity to appeal to an authority figure to step in and control something that they don't like. You got yourself into the argument, you can get yourself out of the argument just as easily. Empower yourself to be better, rather than trying to get auth…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:40 PM
1

Who cares if it is unwarranted? Who cares if it is offensive? It is not a crime to be offensive. Read our rules.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:20 PM
1

Did you seriously report the guy for offensive language?
/r/MensRights01/10/15 03:07 PM
4

That was decent up until the end when he starts with the ad hominem "feminists who are more often overweight and ugly".
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:19 PM
2

I am normally not a fan of this guy's delivery in his videos, but this video was pretty spot on.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:31 PM
0

Christina Hoff Sommers recounts an anecdote in which she attended a feminist conference, and it devolved into bickering among various subgroups of feminists. They do criticize each other. Look at how frequently they claim that Tumblr-feminists aren't real feminists. That is a form of open criticism. As was discussed in a different thread, it is the crazies - the radicals - that push the boundaries so that moderates seem more palatable. That is true even if the moderates have bad ideas.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 12:14 PM
0

"I heard a group of feminists say one thing, and now it applies to all of them." No, it doesn't quite work that way. Some feminists think that there can be only male allies, some think that there can be actual male feminists. The majority lies in the latter camp. Sure they need to re-evaluate things, though. But we need to stop mischaracterizing feminists because it gives them ammo to discredit us.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 11:17 AM
-1

Just stop replying. The conversation isn't going anywhere, and clearly you are the bigger, more rational person. So I am asking you - instead of reporting them, instead of getting upset, just let it go.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 02:44 AM
0

There are male feminists. Stop giving in to the perception that feminist = female.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 02:40 AM
2

Oh, it is obvious why they did it to AVFM. AVFM runs/ran a site specifically for doxxing.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 02:05 AM
1

Bingo.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:17 PM
1

"There is a very tiny difference in the number of boys and girls who aren't in school, so let's focus on the girls."
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:16 PM
1

This isn't really relevant here, either.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:14 PM
3

The title was clearly sarcastic. Perhaps try re-reading it.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 08:46 AM
7

The strategy you discuss is effective, admittedly, but including the radical wing in the non-radical wing undoes that effectiveness. If Elam wants AVFM to be the radical wing, it will end up losing its voice among the mainstream, and /r/MensRights has always been the mainstream by sheer virtue of the nature of Reddit. I think Elam needs to figure out exactly what he wants out of AVFM, and then accept the consequences. He can't have his cake and eat it, too. The moderators here have been very sup…
/r/MensRights27/09/15 08:43 AM
1

That wasn't particularly inflammatory. The question was about why the MRM views feminist arguments as flawed. The reason is that the actions that are acceptable to feminists, the viewpoints supported by feminism, would be viewed as corruption (non-universal, non-impartial) under traditional ethics. People have been raised to view the actions this way, and even feminists view the actions that way themselves when the beneficiary is not women.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:16 PM
3

This isn't an issue of rights.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:07 PM
0

This has nothing to do with rights. Regardless of possible inherent differences between the genders, rights are deserved due to the person's humanity.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:01 PM
15

Modern feminism is predicated on a new set of ethical principles. These are drastically different from what is considered traditional ethics - though that should not be confused with traditionalism, nor should it be taken to mean that traditional ethics leads to traditionalism. A few select quotes: Fifth, and finally, it favors “male” ways of moral reasoning that emphasize rules, rights, universality, and impartiality over “female” ways of moral reasoning that emphasize relationships, responsibi…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:39 PM
1

It is a hand written note. There is nothing official about it. It doesn't represent any system or organization.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 05:39 PM
1

This comment is hilarious - because I removed your submission. I mean, really - there is absolutely ZERO indication of anything related to MR in the title. You just said it was hilarious. Great. Good for you! That is a comment, not a title.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 08:25 PM
1

This isn't a men's rights issue until she is treated differently than a man would.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 08:24 PM
1

You do understand that a person doesn't need to live with their children to be a parent, right? And that "single moms" don't necessarily have 100% custody, right?
/r/MensRights17/09/15 10:51 PM
1

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=deadbeat+dads
/r/MensRights17/09/15 12:29 AM
0

People have reported this. It is a men's rights issue because there is a stark difference with how single moms and single dads are portrayed. Men are portrayed as deadbeats, but here we have an instance of single moms are portrayed in a "women are wonderful" effect way.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 06:02 PM
1

A wonderful continuance.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 10:32 AM
-4

I understand your desire to do this, but think about the bigger issues. If you don't actually need/want to use that specific time, and are just doing it on the principle, you are actually harming the PR of the MRM. Moving forward, we should be focusing on the bigger issues, showing people that men are not disposable and are in fact deserving of concern. Then these other issues can be addressed once those bigger issues are resolved.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 12:28 AM
1

Well, you can correct it or you can leave it removed. Entirely up to you.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 12:24 AM
8

[Citation needed] If you are going to act like a bigoted idiot, at least try to back it up?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 07:43 PM
1

Please read our sidebar for our posting rules.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 07:42 PM
1

If there was a delayed reaction, I would imagine it less likely to be false-flag. The people behind it would have "discovered" it much sooner. But there is no reason to suspect that it has anything to do with the MRM.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:06 PM
0

Well, it has happened before. None-the-less, it is similarly scary to the people who are not "in" on the "joke" if it were.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:05 PM
3

a) I am glad that the threats are not credible. b) It is abhorrent that someone would even say something so stupid.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:04 PM
2

Well, if you make up stories like this, you can say anything you want. We don't ban people for their views being too radical. Hell, Karissa is still around, even though Karissa is pretty strongly feminist-leaning. Demonspawn is around, even though he is pretty traditionalist.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 09:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter