Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]Lethn 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bruh45[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sillymod -2 points-1 points0 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThePigmanAgain 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Icyx [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
I see a problem with the way OP framed the question: "white feminism vs. intersectionality feminism". Even if one agrees with the premise that 'white feminism' contains a racist bias in its concern with trivial 'first world problems'/ at the expense of women who face more significant obstacles...
...it does not follow that 'intersectionality feminism' is cure for the problem, or the opposite of 'white feminism'. Personally, I think 'intersectional' feminism has very 'white' origins in 'white' post-modernist academia... and the entire 'intersectional' critique is guilty of the exact-types of privilege-bias that it claims to critique. For example, Intersectional Feminism pushes-aside the Black Women's movement called Womanism.
Rather than contrast 'white feminism' with a different wave of feminism, I would contrast both 'white' and 'intersectional' feminism vs. Classical Liberal Values.
Or, to apply the popular terms of today: 'white feminism' = [Only Privileged] Women's Lives Matter 'intersectional feminism' = Only some designated victim-identity-groups lives matter 'woman-ism' = black womens (and mens!) lives matter, too!
Classical Liberal Values = All Lives Matter
I would argue that Men's Rights is at it's best & most-inclusive when it adheres to that last one.
I can easily imagine someone trying to designate specific races of men as needing special victim treatment... but looking at How's That Workin' Out For Ya in other movements-- I see unintended negative consequences of trying to use unequal-treatment as a corrective measure. For example, it begins an Oppression Olympics between sub-groups, over who gets the most Victim Points. Like when Black Lives Matter hijacked a Gay Pride parade.
[–]jslnk 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SKNK_Monk 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]motorway6 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]secv808 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Bruh45[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]zangerinus 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link