TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

skinnybignose Archive

View 24 posts and 299 comments by skinnybignose on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
197

Activism/Supportskinnybignose/r/MensRights30/01/16 12:26 PM
151

False Accusationskinnybignose/r/MensRights04/10/15 09:56 AM
105

Disturbingskinnybignose/r/MGTOW15/05/16 08:48 AM
103

skinnybignose/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:46 AM
102

skinnybignose/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:35 AM
95

Newsskinnybignose/r/MensRights09/09/14 06:46 PM
88

skinnybignose/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:35 PM
87

Newsskinnybignose/r/MensRights14/03/15 01:12 PM
76

Newsskinnybignose/r/MensRights24/07/14 05:48 PM
65

Activism/Supportskinnybignose/r/MensRights26/07/15 02:17 PM
61

Anti-MRMskinnybignose/r/MensRights26/12/15 07:13 PM
38

skinnybignose/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:35 PM
28

skinnybignose/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:04 AM
25

Relationshitsskinnybignose/r/MGTOW27/12/15 09:43 PM
18

skinnybignose/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:16 PM
15

skinnybignose/r/MensRights24/03/14 06:39 PM
12

skinnybignose/r/MensRights21/01/14 09:09 PM
5

Activism/Supportskinnybignose/r/MensRights30/01/16 05:56 PM
5

skinnybignose/r/MensRights04/01/14 01:28 PM
4

skinnybignose/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:17 PM
4

skinnybignose/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:56 PM
3

skinnybignose/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:24 PM
1

skinnybignose/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:12 PM
0

skinnybignose/r/MensRights12/04/14 05:55 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

Cargo shorts are awesome. If I'm going for a long walk, hike, or a bit of boulder climbing they're perfect, especially if they also have a zipped pocket for you wallet and phone.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 06:45 PM
2

No, not at all. I'm just glad I done it early; now he's an adult and I've still got plenty of life in me.
/r/MGTOW18/08/16 10:26 PM
19

After analysing all my long-term relationships I realised that it was just too much drama. Being single is much easier. I did spend some time in a bunch of short-term relationships just for banging, but can't be bothered with that any more. Although I do miss some parts of being in a relationship (there's an innate desire I have to fight) I'm overall much happier, less stressed and have tons more money and time to do my own shit with.
/r/MGTOW16/05/16 07:38 PM
1

I do on occasion (did Friday for a friends birthday), but I really do like to dance to cheesy music every now and then. I usually get drunk and go with Charlie to get me in the mood. I tend to ignore most of the women that try to dance with me, sometimes I might talk to them, but I'm usually too trashed to be bothered for even a one night stand.
/r/MGTOW15/05/16 07:28 PM
5

Just because someone associates with a Muslim/Christian/Feminist/PUA, whatever, it doesn't make them one also.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 12:27 PM
1

I've got no problem with a bit of blood sport. It's usually the girl that is disgusted by the idea.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 08:39 PM
0

Most definitely fake.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 08:38 PM
6

Yup, it's all about demand. In most cases in porn it's the woman in demand, not the man. Like football (soccer), male football players get much more money than female football players, because they are more in demand and generate more income.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 07:56 PM
2

41, been MGTOW since 36 but didn't find out it was actually a thing until about 2 years ago.
/r/MGTOW03/01/16 08:08 AM
1

I enjoy Sargon's content; been following him for at least a year now.
/r/MGTOW03/01/16 07:48 AM
1

You didn't make it :(
/r/MensRights30/07/15 06:53 PM
1

Wow, I'm on there for posting a link to a homeless charity's youtube video. How can you be against that?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 09:20 PM
3

I'm in the UK so couldn't say. Here it's pretty rare (for me at least) to see a women sleeping rough, but figures show it's 84% male.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 07:07 PM
9

I don't think you'll need to target any part of women's anatomy to make a point, the shopping bags are enough.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:05 PM
4

I guess we must have all imagined #killallmen.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:33 PM
1

A shop is cleverly raising awareness of the gender pay gap, by charging women less than men. Cleverly? Really?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:30 PM
0

Technically, yes, this was paedophilic rape No it isn't. Paedophilia is being attracted to pre-pubescent children. At most it would be considered ephebophilia
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:48 AM
2

And those numbers are based on what? Oh that's right, they're plucked out of thin air. Completely arbitrary.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 09:17 PM
1

That's hilarious.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 07:33 PM
1

This was posted on my FB wall, something to make everyone smile :)
/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:25 PM
1

I couldn't care less what the dictionary definition of feminism is, I define an ideology on its actions.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:59 AM
1

I watched that when I was about 15 and liked that movie. To be fair they don't actually have sex with her. But you are right, I couldn't see some of those scenes happening with the genders reversed.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:39 AM
1

If you come forward months/years later, you really haven't done yourself any favours. I'm pretty sure the authorities are pretty clear that it needs to be reported immediately to get any hope of a conviction.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 07:53 PM
2

I recently found that out and I can't help but laugh. I wonder where the idea originally came from.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 07:40 PM
1

Should we always believe the victim? I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Believing is irrelevant. Investigation, evidence and facts are what's important.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 07:22 PM
3

Or this one. I could never see this happening with the genders reversed.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 04:03 PM
2

MGTOW all the way. I will make no special effort for a woman that I would not do for a man. Especially for sex, not gonna happen.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 08:44 AM
59

Why is it the default position to believe the accuser and not the accused? Besides, believing is irrelevant. Investigation, evidence and facts are what's important.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 07:29 PM
2

I'm glad I wrote something that inspires :)
/r/MensRights30/11/14 06:57 PM
4

Please do. Right next to the actual poster would be a bonus.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 06:33 PM
13

A lot of people like to get drunk intentionally to lose their inhibitions so they CAN have sex with strangers. They're effectively saying people women aren't capable of doing so.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:41 PM
95

To all you women out there, just remember when you're drunk you are no longer capable of making any decisions for yourself. If you do decide to go out, get drunk and have sex with a stranger, well you're not allowed. Even if you really want to, it doesn't matter, regardless of how much you want it, you are being raped. REMEMBER WOMEN, you DO NOT have the legal right to make your own decisions about being dunk and having sex at the same time. Men on the other hand, you're fully capable of making …
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:06 PM
0

Totally. If you don't want someone to do something you should tell them 100% agree :)
/r/MensRights29/11/14 12:54 PM
-4

I don't know whether it was rape or not (I haven't look into it) but everything you said is blaming the victim. "why did he just not say No?" "he literally did not say a word or try to stop her" "he could have at least muttered the word no" See ;) EDIT: Without looking into it and going on your post I do agree, he should have said NO. I'm just being an ass and saying exactly what the feminist would have said had it been a women. You and I know had it been a women and you posted this the feminist…
/r/MensRights29/11/14 12:40 PM
4

I haven't looked into it at all but it sure sounds like you're victim blaming if you ask me.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 12:28 PM
1

The good ol' not a true Scotsman fallacy and the dictionary definition of feminism. Where does one start? I might reply when I'm able to remove my palms from my face.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:52 PM
1

According to her sexism is prejudice + power. So she's admitting you can be prejudice towards men but not sexist. But sexism is just a form of prejudice based on gender. Also according to her logic once both sexes have equal power neither can be sexist against the other. Then, if women suddenly gain more power than men the sexist things men might do are now longer sexist because women have more power. What the fuck, it makes no logical sense what-so-ever.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 10:17 PM
2

Most definitely NSFW
/r/MensRights18/11/14 10:47 PM
6

The fact that you deny a man the ability to be a victim of sexism is in itself sexist and the fact that you deny a white person the ability to be a victim of racism is in itself racist.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:25 PM
5

I can't help after reading that feeling like there's a lot we're not being told.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:18 PM
2

I get the impression that she's not saying that advanced math and rigorous training is stopping women in STEM fields but what more likely to? Advanced math and rigorous training or a "sexist" shirt.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:14 PM
2

Men who don't have any problems with their SMV but still won't bother with women anyway. Their time is just too precious to waste on the games, shit tests, cognitive dissonance, and drama that many women create. They will hook up with a woman if it's easy, but won't expend any significant energy going out of their way to do so. I'm MGTOW and fit this description exactly.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/14 08:08 PM
6

Why should some one risk getting beaten themselves when trying to intervene? Isn't that what the police are paid to do? this - He decried bystanders who shot cell phone video of the January fight but did not intervene. The footage was key evidence at trial. He's complaining that they gathered bloody evidence.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 06:42 PM
1

Wow, just wow. I'm stunned, speechless. What the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights16/11/14 06:28 PM
1

Wow, for once she didn't sound like a complete cunt.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:23 PM
1

The only time I talk about men's rights is if it comes up in conversation naturally. If you constantly force it into conversation people can start to find it annoying. Being annoying isn't a quality women look for.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:13 PM
1

I really don't think being an MRA has any bearing on whether someone can get laid or not. Not unless someone bangs on about it constantly when they're out to the point of boredom. But hey, I don't even label myself as an MRA, I'm MGTOW and getting laid isn't a problem for me, I just prefer not to most of the time.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:08 PM
8

Yup, same here. I've had my dick grabbed by women in clubs many times and if you complain you get called gay.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 03:49 PM
1

So some people are saying he's a misogynist for wearing that shirt. I guess that means my nan hates Cavalier King Charles Spaniels because she wears a jumper with one on it.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 03:30 PM
2

Years ago when my son was a baby I had the same problem. Finding somewhere to change his nappy was a nightmare. The facilities for doing so were always in the women's toilet and never in the men's. I would usually make a polite complaint or write a note for the suggestion box. I'm pretty sure this has changed now in the UK, but because I don't need to change nappies any more it's not something that I really notice.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 08:11 PM
2

I guarantee that if any man went outside with a sledgehammer and smashed up their girlfriend/wife's car, the police would be calling it a domestic.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 04:29 PM
1

It would be more appropriately titled as 'What Feminists Would See As Domestic Violence if the Genders Were Reversed'.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 04:13 PM
2

Not according to these people and other DV organisation that like to broaden definitions.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 04:09 PM
1

I don't see it as domestic violence myself, but according to 'Men Stopping Violence' it is. Check here at their list which pretty much makes EVERYONE a perpetrator of DV. They even define, and I guote "Claiming “the truth,” being the authority, defining her behavior, using “logic.”" as abuse. Absolutely batshit crazy.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:50 PM
1

Straw man and false equivalency.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 08:35 AM
1

"Please make noise". What kind of noise? Grunt? Hum? Stamp your feet loudly? Makes you seem weird if you ask me, and surely being weird makes it worse.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 07:44 AM
1

You wanna know whats easier than a thousand yeses? One loud NO! ^ THAT ^ Upvote :)
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:56 PM
2

Me too.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:51 PM
1

I genuinely thought that was satire, but clearly it's not by the end. EDIT: Comments and ratings disabled, what a surprise.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:47 PM
1

Each individual case of FGM can vary greatly in severity, just the same as each case of MGM can. They're comparable because a part of a child's genitalia is being cut off unnecessarily, without their consent.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 06:32 PM
6

They're comparing 2 different jobs. Men and women on the shop floor will earn the same rate for sitting on their arse at a checkout scanning baked beans. Men and women in the warehouse will earn the same rate for standing all day, and lifting heavy shit. You don't need to be a genius to work out that warehouse work is harder then shop floor work.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 06:15 PM
1

I've lost count of the amount of times a women has grabbed my arse/cock in a club.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 10:31 PM
40

True, so many of the ads in the USA that depict blatant violence would never be allowed in the UK.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 08:55 PM
3

That would be good if he did, but I can't see it happening. On the one I can see him not wanting to say something because he might think it will ruin his 'hard man' image and on the other hand see him saying something because of his 'hard man' image. That's assuming he cares enough about male victims of DV and the fact that not all men have the same physical persona as he has.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 08:27 PM
3

That's probably the best and most useful explanation I've seen/read.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 06:51 PM
3

It's been a while since I've read so much horse shit.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 06:28 PM
1

I'll stop beating you up when you stop accusing me of beating you up.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 03:41 AM
1

I've known plenty of girls that have had messy apartments, and I mean filthy.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:03 PM
4

I'm so glad most of the comments are vehemently against MGM.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 10:05 PM
28

How is this practice not illegal; it's fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 09:07 PM
1

I hate the term 'reverse sexism'; it's just sexism like you say. Although I did get the impression she used the term there intentionally so the reader would know so meant sexism towards men.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:01 AM
3

A pretty refreshing article for 'FEMAIL', which has a few good points.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 05:49 PM
17

That is an awesome ad.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:25 PM
1

Why post anything to do with Elliot Roger? He had nothing to do with the MRM and posting about him only makes it seem as if he did. I guess that fact that the MRM wasn't mentioned is good, there could never be enough distance between him and the MRM.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 06:56 PM
35

Lets see if this gets as much coverage as #bring back our girls. EDIT: Spelling
/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:36 AM
3

Men and women can never be equal, even if you eliminated every legal and social inequality between the sexes we would still be sexually dimorphic.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 07:36 PM
19

If there is an all powerful male conspiracy to oppress all women it's not doing a very good job. EDIT: At least not in the Western world.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:03 PM
1

Although most MRAs roll their eyes at MGTOW people, they don't get banned. I'm both, so does that mean I roll my eyes at myself? :P
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:24 PM
1

Sorry, I probably didn't do it quite as well as I should. I was looking for the debunk of the top point in the link.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:22 PM
2

Not sure what people will think of this. I saw it as a father having fun with his young daughter, (being bad in a satirical manner), that ultimately made him a great dad.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:20 PM
1

Thanks, that's helpful. I think there was a youtube video that someone made too.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:39 PM
1

I'm pretty sure somewhere there was a debunk of Jacqueline Goodchilds survey (first item in the link). Anyone know where it is as this just popped up on my facebook page. I'd be very grateful if someone can point me in the right direction. Thanks
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:57 PM
3

Not that I remember, but she knows me well enough to know I'm not homophobic.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:37 PM
1

Do you really expect people here to agree with this? Sure sounds like a troll post. If not, you really have come to the wrong place.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 01:25 PM
9

I don't really remember it verbatim, but pretty much that I should shut up. There was no real argument as such.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:54 AM
5

The UK went to war with Argentina over the Falklands when Margaret Thatcher was prime minister.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:53 PM
0

'Alot' isn't actually a word.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:43 PM
6

I don't think the issue is whether or not you think she is a rapist; it's more to do with the feminist double standard. If the genders were reversed the feminists would be in uproar about it, that's the real point.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:18 PM
2

Maybe I should suggest they make these changes to their definitions. Astronaut A person, typically a man, who is trained to travel in a spacecraft. Scientist A person, typically a man, who is studying or has expert knowledge of one or more of the natural or physical sciences. Cleaner A person, typically a woman, or thing that cleans something. Miser A person, typically a Jew, who hoards wealth and spends as little money as possible.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:41 AM
1

A joke about a disgusting, hideous crime only works because it's disgusting and hideous, that's how comedy works. If rape was something that people thought was acceptable and normal, then rape jokes wouldn't be funny at all and wouldn't be told. So in a way, the fact that people tell rape jokes and many people find them funny, is a good thing because it tells us that the general consensus is that rape is a very bad thing. You may not necessarily agree that rapes jokes are funny, but it may help …
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:05 AM
2

Curious, they didn't mention the scene with a man getting his penis cut off. You'd almost think they didn't care about that bit of sexual violence.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 08:12 PM
3

Bullet dodged by the sound of things.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 08:02 PM
1

This guys was on a TV dating program in the UK called 'Take Me Out' and ended up on a date with a really nice looking brunette. Here if anyone's that interested.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:23 PM
3

Makes as much sense as a lot of them.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 12:33 AM
2

I need feminism because 'insert something non sequitur here'.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 06:10 PM
30

People care about the lives of 3 women, but not more than the lives of 680 men, what the actual fuck.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 06:19 PM
2

I'm pretty sure that's done the rounds here a few times. I'd be surprised if they haven't been bombarded with emails about how sexist it is, if not, then they need to be.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 06:07 PM
3

Why hasn't this video got more views.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:03 PM
3

I guess it could depend on the context, but, generally it's just not necessary, it can make you look like you're boasting and trying to make women feel bad.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:39 PM
3

I might be wrong but I'm sure most necrophiliacs aren't opportunists that just happen to stumble on a dead body in the woods and think "I'll shag that". Aren't they usually the one responsible for killing the victim first? EDIT: Just to clarify, I wasn't suggesting that necrophilia doesn't exist, just the idea that a man discovering a dead body in the woods randomly and deciding it would be a great to stick his tongue in its mouth. EDIT 2: Spelling
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:38 PM
15

I have no sources to sight, but I'm pretty sure that's an event that has never actually happen in the history of the universe.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:20 PM
2

It's really difficult to quantify a percentage of women that play hard to get, but the fact that it happens at all will put the thought into a man's mind that maybe this girl is, thus justifying some level of persistence.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 05:15 AM
3

Perhaps some women may feel that way, but most rational women only consider it harassment if the guy doesn't take a polite no for an answer (which is VERY common), I think you're most likely right here, but the one thing that makes this difficult to judge is the amount of women out there that like to play hard to get. does it in an intimidating way (invading personal space, making heavy sexual innuendo, etc) which is also unfortunately quite common Yeah, unfortunately this does happen, but I wou…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 05:02 AM
57

Uh-oh, you've attracted unwanted attention, otherwise known as sexual harassment. It really pisses me off when unwanted attention is classified as sexual harassment, you will only ever find out it's unwanted after the attention is given and you get a rejection and if men don't approach women expressing interest in them the human race will die out. EDIT: I'd go as far as saying at least 90% of us exist because a man hit on a women and it worked.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 08:36 PM
11

To be honest, I think carpenters and plumbers should be on a higher pay scale than secretaries. So the fact they are on the same pay scale and getting less makes it even worse to me.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:54 PM
5

Yeah, you're right, they are doing different work, but they are on the same 'pay grade'. Different jobs, on the same pay grade, for the same institution, should really get the same or at least similar pay.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:40 PM
1

I'm really not sure. You could try speaking to your local MP or setting up a partition to the government.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 07:14 PM
1

Yes, rape is a far more serious crime than sexual assault. Although there are many degrees of severity of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 06:56 PM
1

I should clarify, it would still be sexual assault and put a person in trouble with the law. It just wouldn't be rape.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 06:45 PM
9

That is correct; the law in the UK states that in order to rape someone you need to penetrate them. So a women could drug you with rohypnol and viagra, fuck you while you're unconscious without your consent and it's not rape according to the law. Absolutely ridiculous.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 06:25 PM
2

At least she's not a hypocrite, impressed.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:28 PM
3

Such outrage for something so mundane. I wonder if she was as pissed with TubeCrush, where women take pictures of guys they think are hot? You know, that one where women objectify men. Naa, I doubt she gave a shit about that facebook page.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:04 PM
12

I'm so sick of hearing feminists whining about the wage gap; why are they completely ignoring the actual facts?
/r/MensRights13/04/14 10:53 PM
1

The message I got was that Aussie builders are sexist, misogynistic assholes. Them being nice was "you're not you when you're hungry". If I was an Aussie builder I might just feel a little insulted.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 06:13 PM
1

Empowerment is important. Don’t let anyone take yours away from you. Always refer to males as boys. Even if they’re 20. Or 30. It semantically takes power away from them. Very hypocritical. EDIT: Pretty much the whole thing is a load a selfish, hypocritical bullshit to be honest. EDIT 2: Just got to the end; it must be satire.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:18 PM
4

During my entire life, I have not known anyone (including myself), that's had an issue, medical or otherwise, that would have been solved with the absence of a foreskin. In actual fact I've know more people that have had appendix problems, but we don't lop them out of everyone just in case.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 08:16 PM
4

Myself and I'm sure most other Europeans look at these sort of studies in disbelief at the utter nonsense they promote.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 07:41 PM
5

I like the way she talks over him saying "white men definitely feel like they're entitled to talk over me". She came across as being racist herself.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:44 PM
4

Sorry, but rape is about the physical act of sex and the exploitation/violation.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 06:20 PM
4

Personally, I don't think anyone in their early 20's should have an irreversible operation as a form of birth control.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 07:29 PM
-1

Leave the toilet seat down as she requested, just don't forget to piss on it before you leave.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 06:06 PM
8

I think it's pretty compelling evidence that if you see rape in that poster you must have rape on the brain. Some feminists seem to think that all men have rape on the brain, but let's see, is it the men or the feminists that are seeing rape in that poster?
/r/MensRights01/04/14 05:58 PM
16

I'm amazed they still have a sign up like that, 'parent and child' signs seem pretty standard everywhere now.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 07:02 PM
4

Yeah, it was in response to thunderf00t's video. It's here if anyone is interested.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:51 PM
2

I always thought that the mansize Keenex was hinting to the idea that it'll take your load when having a wank ;)
/r/MensRights26/03/14 07:53 PM
3

I'm not too sure if this has been posted before, but it's something I found on menstoppingviolence.org. I found so much of it objectionable, apart from just the simple idea that we should be stopping violence against everyone, not just women. Most, if not all of those behaviours are perpetrated by women too, but this is what really got me - "Claiming “the truth,” being the authority, defining her behavior, using “logic.”" What the actual fuck, using logic. EDIT: "Using pornography". Come on, lot…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 06:46 PM
4

I'm not really sure what I was meant to see there to be honest. Everyone seemed pretty happy either way to me and if there was a difference it was so subtle I missed it. Also, even if there was a difference it could be down to their differing personalities and nothing to do with gender at all.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 03:20 PM
3

Someone done a great video on youtube debunking this graph. If anyone has the link can they post it as I can't remember it. EDIT: Found it here
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:54 PM
0

I know the author didn't write that comment, hence me noting "quoted comment" and my sentiments weren't directed at the author of the article. I thought that was obvious from the way I wrote it.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 06:53 PM
103

Aren't the wages for baby sitting negotiated between the parent and the baby sitter? I'm pretty sure this is the case, so it's not like there's some kind of conspiracy to make men earn more than women in babysitting. Also this quoted comment pissed me off “I personally would have a hard time hiring a male babysitter for obvious reasons.” Please, what are these obvious reasons you cunt?
/r/MensRights18/03/14 09:28 PM
3

They only did it because they were hoping for sexual favours in return /s
/r/MensRights16/03/14 08:01 AM
3

You could imagine the uproar if someone said something like 'real woman make sandwiches/give blow jobs' or whatever.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:30 PM
3

That's it. Starting today the next guy to text me and ask me on a date will be deleted from my cell phone -- permanently. I wonder if she's ever bothered asking anyone on a date full stop?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 06:55 PM
3

Yeah, true. It's still illegal in Ireland unless the mother's life is in danger.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 06:51 PM
15

This is a real serious problem and the draconian nature of their law has put me off of ever visiting the Maldives. EDIT: Thought I'd mention that because of such a large international outcry it never happened.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:47 PM
9

I don't like to differentiate between FGM and MGM; it's all infant genital mutilation. The major difference between girls and boys is that girls get the luxury of it being illegal in most of the Western world and boys mostly don't.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:33 PM
14

When you say that "sexual assault is more of a problem for women than for men" I agree. But it makes me wonder; is it because men are sexually assaulted less often or because we cope with it in a different manner? I believe it's the later; I've had women in clubs grab my arse/cock, I've suffered sexual harassment from women. The difference I've found is that men shrug it off and I believe that's because men feel less physically threatened by women. Also, I agree a lot of women's problems are hum…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:26 PM
6

As far as the law goes, I don't know of one single way in which the law discriminates against women in my country (UK) and I'd go as far as saying there isn't one law that does (I'm willing to be proven wrong, but I doubt I will be). As far as social issues, slut shaming, cat calling, making assumptions due to gender stereotyping. That's all I can really think of right now and it's pretty trivial when compared to what a lot of women suffer in the Middle East.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:13 PM
18

I guess it really depends on the country in question. In most of the Western world it could be argued that most of women's issues are social rather than institutionalised by law. Meanwhile, there are plenty countries where women do have legal constraints that affect them.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:42 PM
0

Hey, I thinking of setting up business refurbishing people's computers. I charge £45 to refurbish a man's computer and £55.00 to refurbish a women's computer. Is that ok?
/r/MensRights27/02/14 07:08 PM
6

Yup, damned if you do, damned if you don't. I've heard feminists moan at men because of being chivalrous and heard other feminists say they don't mind it. I just play it safe now and don't bother at all, and if someone complains that I'm not chivalrous, I'll just mention I'm showing the equality that women want. Plus it's true, I've seen a women and thought she might be pregnant and been scared to say something just in case she just might have a bit of a fat belly going on.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:46 PM
2

I wish all people with logic and rationale were as brutally honest as this man.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 10:37 PM
2

Shit, I can't believe I made that mistake; I'm normally such a grammar Nazi ;)
/r/MensRights18/02/14 08:27 AM
6

True, I'm in the UK and there's no way any of the offices I've worked in would except accept it either way. EDIT: Oops, my bad.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 08:12 PM
2

Christ, Tessa Jowell was given the opportunity to answer that question twice and still couldn't come up with a valid response. I'm glad the logic and reason of some of the other panellists outweighed her nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 11:09 AM
4

Yeah there were, but I also remember reading something about the studies being poor. It has something to do with men in Africa that are circumcised are generally more religious, married and in monogamous relationships. Whereas uncircumcised men are generally less religious and more likely to have multiple partners and hence a higher risk. So, it's only a correlation not a causation.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 09:32 AM
4

I wish I'd taken a photo, but I was in the supermarket and there was a rack for huge valentines cards. Each row alternated between 'Most Wonderful Girlfriend' and 'Most Wonderful Boyfriend' cards, The 'Most Wonderful Girlfriend' cards had sold out, but the 'Most Wonderful Boyfriend' cards were full.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 02:59 AM
1

In one way it's not. But, why aren't feminists also trying to get quotas for garbage collectors and sewage workers if they're that interested in equality? It's essentially because they're only interested in gaining the positions that give money and power. You could also argue that having an influence in the teaching system is a powerful position. Look at how teaching is in the Western world; there's no competition, things that boys enjoy like being about to 'rough and tumble' aren't allowed and …
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:58 AM
24

The statement "male sexism doesn't exist" is in itself sexist. Oh the irony.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:42 AM
10

That double standard has always bugged me even though I don't, and don't want to own any sex toys.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:40 AM
2

Gotta find a way, to find a way, when I'm there. Gotta find a way, a better way, I had better wait.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:36 AM
0

I've thought about it, but I'm also considering becoming a sperm donor so I can help other people have children that can't.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:27 AM
8

If you aren't for equality for all, you aren't for equality at all. Shit, I like that.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 08:38 PM
8

Yup, I totally agree, my Son is 16 and it won't be long before he's no longer my financial responsibility. I don't want any more children and I certainly don't plan on ever getting married again. The idea of accidentally getting someone pregnant with the zero reproductive rights that I have has put me in a position where I don't even want to have casual relationships with women any more; the risk is just too great. Maybe that will change if the male pill finally happens.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 08:29 PM
10

I'm so glad he didn't play along with their stupid game. Look feminists, a man that didn't act like a pervert when given the opportunity.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:32 AM
3

Really nicely put; who could argue with that. It's a shame there are still complete ignoramuses that make ill informed comments like this, "Certainly not all men are predators, but perhaps you haven’t noticed that almost without exception, all predators in the form of rapists, murderers, stalkers, child molesters, and peddlers of pornography, are male." Errrr, no, just no.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 09:01 AM
2

You only need to pay if they're in A-level education up until 20 years old. Once they're in education above A-level and they're at least 18 you don't have to pay. Look here :) EDIT: I've only got 2 years left, my son will have finished his A-levels by 18 and will be hopefully in degree education, he's 16 right now.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 08:39 AM
14

A talk on the censoring of men's issues, and the feminists want to pull down the posters. Do they not see the irony?
/r/MensRights05/02/14 08:26 AM
1

Believing is irrelevant. An accusation just has to be taken seriously, whether you believe or not makes no odds to how something should be investigated. Do people not realise you can't stand up in a court of law because you 'believe' someone, evidence is required.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:51 PM
1

I think they can if the use something (finger or object) to penetrate your anus. Some one correct me if I'm wrong though please.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 11:34 PM
2

What the actual fuck, he dodged a bullet.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 09:43 PM
1

It's better but the whole definition is poor in general. Using the word 'rape' within the definition of 'rapist' makes me think whoever wrote that definition isn't too smart.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 06:46 PM
1

Absolutely true.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 10:25 PM
4

Yes, most men like breasts. But I would argue it's not all sexual; there's the effect of comfort, nurturing and motherly love that they represent too. I would also argue that that is why many straight women love breasts too.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 08:41 AM
1

Thought I'd post this as this guy does some pretty good videos that are worth a look.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 09:10 PM
5

Here. The first half a dozen or so videos from manwomanmyth might help you.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 05:11 PM
3

Look at this guys 'misandry in the media' series.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 05:43 AM
1

Yeah, I didn't think of that, that's more equivalent, but it wasn't exactly meant to be serious.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 08:09 PM
1

Yeah, I realise it wasn't really equivalent (not exactly possible to make it equivalent but that's the best I could do). It was also meant to be tongue in cheek but I guess you missed that.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 08:08 PM
2

What annoys me with Amazon is that they took down the t-shirt 'KEEP CALM AND HIT HER' within hours of them "accidentally" putting them up for sale before floods of complaints came in.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 10:29 PM
6

I wonder what would happen if it was the girlfriend that was in a coma and the boyfriend requested "Look, we were talking about having a baby before she was in the coma, I'll only be a minute and then, if she hasn't woken in 9 months she could have a c-section right?".
/r/MensRights15/01/14 09:39 PM
3

I was at a BBQ last Summer and the hosting couple had a girl and a boy both younger that 10. When I went to the toilet I noticed the 'Boys Are Stupid, Throw Rocks At Them' book and thought I'd have a read of it in the garden. When I came out with it a couple of my friends noticed me with it knowing I'm quite against the idea of this book. My friends don't really care much for it, but one of the pages says something like 'beware of feminine boys' which to me seemed pretty homophobic (not that all…
/r/MensRights15/01/14 09:16 PM
2

I thought that was pretty well balanced; the writer acknowledges that apps for women that demean men are bad.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 08:57 PM
0

There are times when 'good guys' fight and kill women too. From memory John McClane gives a woman a good kicking in 'Live Free or Die Hard' (2007) and in one of the 'Xmen' films I remember Wolverine doing the same to a women who was a female version of him. I'm sure there are more films that show 'baddie' women being beaten/hit/killed by 'goodie' men. Just playing Devil's advocate ;) EDIT: It just came to my mind that these examples portray the women as being a contender with regard their fighti…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 09:31 PM
2

Very useful, thanks. I must say it really bugs me when people spout statistics just because they've heard them down the pub or read them on the internet and have just accepted them as truth without even bothering to investigate them.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 09:12 PM
4

I see your point, but at the same time he's looking very competent at what he's doing instead of a complete idiot. EDIT: I have to add that in the UK the best chefs are mostly men anyway. Don't know how it is in the US though.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 09:57 PM
1

Yeah, those to. You might be right about Hillary Clinton; it's possible that Gloria Allred quoted her but I really don't know.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:50 PM
2

Agreed, a person that has been indoctrinated their entire life to believe something is normal has an opinion based on cultural bias. So much so I see it as completely invalid. Now here we see some logic and rational thinking.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 04:35 PM
2

It's seems to be the feminist favourite of logical fallacies. My favourite is Gloria Allred's "if you're not a feminist you're a bigot". What stupidity; You could be either, neither or both.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 04:10 PM
2

For some reason I'm having a lot of trouble posting a review, I was trying to post this - I hate to piss on the feminist hate brigade (pun intended), but isn't this lip urinal based on the 'Rolling Stones' lips logo by 'John Pasche' which in turn was inspired by Mick Jagger's own rather large lips. So it's not even based on a woman, it's based on Mick Jagger.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:07 PM
4

I don't get it? It's not like you go into the urinal and piss in the mouth of a REAL women who's chained to the wall. That's exactly what you'd think by the reaction. One person put a comment on the facebook page saying it's "part of the rape culture which pervades our society", really? How exactly? And how can anyone tell that it's a women's mouth? Just looks like any old mouth to me, and I wouldn't care if it's meant to be male or female. EDIT: Spelling (again) EDIT 2: Anyway, I always thought…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:26 PM
3

What a horrible woman.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 10:31 PM
2

Taking a girlfriend shopping is just one for the most god awful pastimes, I genuinely feel that man's pain, but for some reason I can see this story cropping up in Bill Burr's next lot of material.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 09:19 PM
2

I hate shopping with girlfriends, it's got to be one of the most tediously boring pastimes ever. I can't believe he took her shopping for 5 hours, 5 fucking hours and then got called a skinflint. Seriously, I think I would've been thinking the same thing, but he, unlike me, has the balls to just do it. Tragic. EDIT: Spelling
/r/MensRights09/12/13 09:05 PM
3

What? "I’m not a feminist because feminists are mean and nasty people" Implying that she doesn't think she's a mean, nasty person. "women have put up with being oppressed for thousands of years, so if men end up being abused, mutilated or killed by women today, then they should just suck it up." Condones today's men being KILLED because of things that happened to women, who are no longer alive today, by men, who are no longer alive today. How can she NOT realise she's a CUNT. EDIT: According to …
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:25 PM
1

I was thinking that myself, I use just normal condoms and they feel tight and restrictive on me, I was thinking I may need a larger size.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 03:05 PM
1

I too think the Gary Jules version is better, but the original is still great and I grew up in the 80's, so there's some nostalgia there too.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 08:59 AM
3

Haha, you're right. It's an ad for travelling Europe; I was looking at guided tours across Europe last week.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 08:33 AM
12

For me I decided 7 years ago I'll never get married again, then 4 years ago (after splitting up with my 5 year long-term girlfriend) I decided I'll never have a serious relationship. Spent the next 3 years in casual relationships and now I'm completely free of the need for female approval. I've never felt so in control of my life.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 12:31 AM
6

Men Going Their Own Way
/r/MensRights09/12/13 12:23 AM
3

Believe me I'm grateful to live in the Western world where we have a fairly comfortable life, but when asked to check my privileged it's not as a comparison to the developing countries or the 3rd world. It's as a white heterosexual male in the western world in comparison to the (non)white (non)heterosexual (non)male in the Western world. I'm pretty sure in the 21st century Western world there are plenty of women, black, and homosexual people that are more comfortable and successful in life than …
/r/MensRights08/12/13 11:48 PM
7

Wasn't there one in the film 'Super' too? A female on male rape that I can't ever imagine being allowed if the genders were reversed. EDIT: Here
/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:56 PM
2

Haha, weird, that was the last well written piece I remember reading from the Daily Mail. Well, they have 1 decent reporter who can write a logical argument who just happens to be a MRA. EDIT: It's interesting that he's a MRA writing in Femail. Most likely the only one writing in there with any sense.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:39 PM
15

EDIT 2: Even if we said that white heterosexual males as a GROUP were privileged that doesn't necessarily mean as an individual white heterosexual male that I am privileged. Yet I'm being asked as an individual to check my privilege, not as a group.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:26 PM
2

That's the thing, I've got to a point where I don't need a women or any female approval at all. I feel completely in control of my life. Because of this women seem to be more interested in me. Oh the irony.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:30 PM
1

The reason I pointed you to that is if your wife is saying you're not manly enough, she's basically saying you're not alpha male enough. Redpill to me is about shaking off that beta male and becoming the alpha male that women look for. Although I've now pretty much gone MGTOW since my last dating spree a year ago.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:13 PM
5

That's exactly how I thought it was, but the person I was replying to is trying to say it's a 2 way street. I was trying to get said person to justify their comment, it seems I'll be waiting a long time.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 08:39 PM
3

To me is sounds like you might need to look at some redpill philosophy. Although I don't follow it completely it helped me understand the psychology of women and the small ways in which you can change your language to make yourself more appealing in relationships. I know there are a lot of different views on here about redpill theory but it made me much more confident as a man. EDIT: SPELLING
/r/MensRights08/12/13 08:30 PM
2

There was a TV ad in the UK some 20 years ago (can't remember what it was advertising) where a family were having breakfast and the father looked at his son and thought to himself 'I wonder where he got that red hair from'. The next shot is the red headed milkman giving the wife the milk at the front door. It seems paternity fraud has been a long standing joke with society.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 07:46 PM
9

Everything I seen shows it as being a one way street. Like here. It would make me a lot happier if it did go both ways but I've not seen anything to indicate that's the case. I'd be willing to see it if you have some links that show that's the case. EDIT: The whole idea is a complete mess, if you're both drunk does that mean you raped each other?
/r/MensRights08/12/13 07:29 PM
37

Yeah, me too. I hate using condoms but I'm scared shitless of becoming a father again. My son hasn't got long to go before he's an adult and I'm no longer financially responsible for him. Sod having another 18 years of that. The last girl I dated the condom must have split about 3 times in the months we were shagging, so now I've just completely stopped dating because it's just not worth the risk. EDIT: God, I went on a bit there, but the idea of a male pill will give so much control over our ow…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 07:08 PM
36

I heard that the male pill has come up with feminist opposition in the past, but I don't know how true that is without doing some research.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 06:54 PM
8

One of the few well written articles that I've seen come out of the 'Daily Mail'.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 06:52 PM
3

Seriously, breast feeding is the most natural way for a mother to bond with her baby; people who have a problem with this really need to grow up.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 06:40 PM
15

Why would you even support something that has so much contempt for your support.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 06:30 PM
10

Exactly my point, why are women just allowing feminists to treat them like children that can't make their own decisions? EDIT: By "allowing" I mean that I don't hear as much vocal protesting from women on this subject as I'd like to.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 04:57 PM
4

It's entirely possible that someone (who is drunk (or sober for that matter)) may try to coerce you into driving drunk because they want you to also drive them home. "Oh, come on, you'll be ok, you've only have 2 pints". That's not an impossible scenario.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 04:55 PM
24

If I was a women I'd be incredibly insulted if someone told me I wasn't capable of deciding for myself if I wanted to fuck someone because I'd been drinking. Hell, I'm pretty sure some people go out purposely to get drunk, just so they lose their inhibitions, to make it easier for them to meet someone to fuck.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 04:03 PM
3

Atheism and agnosticism aren't mutually exclusive; you can be both because one is about what you believe and the other about what you know. Agnostic atheist - Someone that doesn't believe in God, but doesn't claim to know God doesn't exists. Agnostic theist - Someone that believes in God, but doesn't claim to know that God exists.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 02:08 PM
2

The original 'Tears For Fears' version kicks it's butt, although it really wouldn't have worked with that ad.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 12:43 PM
1

Thank you, you just saved my ears. :)
/r/MensRights08/12/13 12:40 PM
10

Some of the comparisons didn't come across as being equivalent to me. Take the 'persuasive' guy, he actually looked like he was being persuasive but the woman had a much more aggressive look making the 'pushy' label justified. It would have worked if they kept the expressions the same. Also 'selfish' and 'vain' are in no way exclusive to women. In fact, I've never once heard a guy describe another guy as being 'neat' (that's not to say they don't), but I've heard plenty say vain. I'm not even to…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 12:35 PM
1

Just the first thing I found on google. I couldn't find the documentary, which outlined pretty much the same thing. But I guess there's no real way of telling how reliable those sources are. Though it does make some logical sense from a certain perceptive.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 11:40 PM
1

If you google it, you will find. Here, point 2.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 10:45 PM
1

I forget where I saw the documentary (possibly on youtube), but it was about interviews that were conducted with rapists. They were asked what they look for in a victim and one of the main things most rapist said was they looked for someone who had clothes that were easy to take off/get around. It might be an assumption on my part as I never tried to forcibly take off a girls clothes, but I reckon that it's easier to get access to the vagina of a girl who's wearing a short skirt than say jeans. …
/r/MensRights07/12/13 10:20 PM
6

It's not mocking the action of rape; it's mocking the totally pointless and insulting feminist rhetoric "don't tell women what to wear, tell MEN not to rape" (or something to that effect). Firstly, I speak for myself and I'm pretty sure most people here when I say, rape is a disgusting thing and rapists are some of the worst kinds of people. But, the thing is MEN don't rape; rapists rape. Those statements completely ignore male victims of rape and female perpetrators, does that sound like equali…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 08:36 PM
8

Err, no, just no. He misinterpreted what I said. I typed it knowing what I meant from my perspective and judging by the upvotes most people got it too. No need to name call.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 07:53 PM
3

Yes, plenty, but I'm not too sure what you're getting at. You'll need to be more explicit because I would hate to start making assumptions about what you're suggesting.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 07:46 PM
6

Thank you, I'm glad you and I hope most people understood where I was coming from. Have an upvote :)
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:48 PM
48

Absolutely, but try telling a feminist that not only should we teach people (not men) not to rape (which we do) but we should also advise people how to avoid rape. I think they start yelling something about victim blaiming, rape apology and what not. ;)
/r/MensRights07/12/13 05:43 PM
3

That's a really good point you've made there.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:23 PM
5

What next? Blame the mother because she gave birth to them? Blame the father because he aided their conception? EDIT: Fixed it for myself
/r/MensRights07/12/13 10:51 AM
103

Don't teach ME how to do self defence; teach bullies not to hit me.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 10:44 AM
2

I guess because it's sexist nonsense that shows the double standard in society. I'm sure there would be an uproar if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 10:39 AM
3

What more can you expect from the 'Daily Mail'? They seem to be good at writing nonsense. I hope they write it with the genders reversed and put it in the men's section. Oh wait, there isn't one.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 10:25 AM
3

That was so awful :(
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:50 AM
9

Someone needs to look up 'false dichotomy'. EDIT: Spelling
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:40 AM
1

PMSL :)
/r/MensRights05/12/13 11:36 PM
1

That video just gives me the impression that feminists can't wait until sexuality is all but dead and humanity becomes a multitude of androgynous beings making babies by spunking in laboratory jars.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 11:04 PM
55

That was brilliant; just brilliant.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 10:44 PM
2

Thanks, set that to 'watch later' when I've got 3 hours to kill over the weekend, been meaning to read it for ages. :)
/r/MensRights05/12/13 10:30 PM
3

They either say 'Why are so many MEN becoming victims of domestic violence?' or 'Why has feminism lied to us for the last 30 years about male DV?' They just haven't got the balls to say the latter unfortunately. EDIT: Spelling
/r/MensRights05/12/13 10:17 PM
3

That one had me too; just brilliant. py0 has a great ability to spew logical fallacies, especially likes to present a false dichotomy.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 09:58 PM
0

Some of the comments are gold dust :)
/r/MensRights05/12/13 09:50 PM
5

Thanks, that last link has some stuff in it that I would really like to read when I get a bit more time :)
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:02 PM
1

The study also proved that 6% of men and 15% of women are liars ;)
/r/MensRights05/12/13 07:45 PM
2

I'm really surprised the girl behind the bar didn't say something, after all it's one of bars customers that's being spiked. Surely they wouldn't want that happening in their bar.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:56 AM
7

So basically, be a complete sycophant; I can see that working, not.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:30 AM
212

This women is nuts for thinking that just because they're white men they can't be discriminated against; only worrying thing is, I think there are plenty of other people out there that have that point of view. Scary.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 08:15 PM
16

'The investigation will now determine whether the woman was a victim of domestic or psychological violence from her partner.' 'By getting rid of the child, she may have been trying to meet the needs of her boyfriend who wanted more attention.' Always looking for a way to blame the man and absolve the women from responsibility.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 07:10 PM
1

Yeah I agree, maybe I should have emphasised LESS LIKELY.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:26 PM
7

They get time off to recover and raise the child during the important early months, it's paid by the government not the employer, and the employer is allowed to employ someone else to fill the position until they get back. It's been the case in the UK for a long time and seems to work well. EDIT: Spelling
/r/MensRights29/11/13 09:05 AM
8

Nothing has really changed in the amount of time that's taken off of work; they're just allowing the father to take a share of the maternity leave women ALREADY get in the UK. That's a good thing. It means it's less likely that employers will discriminating against women because they might take off maternity leave, because men, from now on, are just as likely to do so. When ever I hear a feminist complain that employers allegedly discriminate against women because they take maternity leave, my a…
/r/MensRights29/11/13 08:43 AM
9

There's a lady at work that greets me with "hello gorgeous" everyday, maybe I should throw her out the window after smashing a chair over her head.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:58 PM
1

Thanks, done :)
/r/MensRights27/11/13 08:46 AM
1

Yeah I know; I'm from the UK myself. I just bugs me seeing these headlines that differ based on the gender of the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 08:31 AM
6

Shouldn't their headline be - Why are so many female teachers statutory raping their students?
/r/MensRights26/11/13 08:07 PM
3

That was a level of stupid I've not seen for a loooooooong time.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 08:00 PM
8

No, of course not; men can't be objectified because patriarchy/rape culture, it was a male power fantasy /S Just like this one. See?
/r/MensRights25/11/13 10:38 PM
1

I wonder what is the percentage of people that die of cancer that are aged between 15 - 45? I would take a stab in the dark and say it's only a small percentage of the overall cancer deaths due to cancer getting more common the older people get.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 09:12 PM
3

For sure, there are people who identify as feminists that most likely do want gender equality. There are also people who identify as feminists that don't have an in-depth understanding of it's entire workings as an ideology. The problem is (like you said) every feminist has there own definition of what it means to be a feminist which has also caused much internal conflict.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 05:04 PM
3

I want to watch 'To Kill A Mockingbird' now :)
/r/MensRights24/11/13 12:34 PM
3

That's a good answer; I think people tend to listen to women when they talk about men's issues.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 12:20 PM
13

Yeah, I get the impression by the articles on 'how to be a good male feminists' that it's basically shut up, do what you're told, don't have an opinion and certainly don't use that thing called logic to mansplain explain possible errors in their arguments. EDIT: Grammar
/r/MensRights24/11/13 11:10 AM
1

Glad it was useful; it's something that's been rattling around my head for some time.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 11:06 AM
16

Thank you, I think there may be many other reasons too. I remember Helen Smith saying in an interview that men are less likely to complain and people will take a women complaining about men's issues much more seriously (words to that effect, can't remember it verbatim).
/r/MensRights24/11/13 11:03 AM
4

Oral sex :)
/r/MensRights24/11/13 09:56 AM
29

This comment from youtube sums it up well. "This is like a breast cancer ad with a bunch of women running to fix a man a sandwich, because his girlfriend is too stupid to do so."
/r/MensRights24/11/13 09:01 AM
20

How is a 3 year old on his early stages of adolescence?
/r/MensRights22/11/13 08:38 AM
9

I totally agree with you. BBC, please demonstrate how it is that "men contribute so little".
/r/MensRights22/11/13 08:26 AM
3

I find that quite agreeable; men and women have the same amount of self control but men have stronger impulses. It doesn't sound that outrageous.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 10:44 PM
1

What country are you in? In the UK if a mother claims from the state for a child the state will automatically make sure the father is paying their contribution and if not take it directly from him.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 08:29 AM
8

If you want equality there really aren't any counter arguments, it's just that society seems to think that if a man doesn't take responsibility he's an arse/deadbeat, yet a women can pretty much choose as she pleases with little condemnation.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 10:31 AM
4

I actually subscribe to his channel and I've not seen that video for a while. I agree with his video completely, but if you try and have an open discussion about that topic it's quite often met with hostility no matter how much logic you use to support the argument. EDIT: Spelling
/r/MensRights17/11/13 10:20 AM
2

Couldn't have said it better myself :)
/r/MensRights13/11/13 07:46 PM
2

If she hasn't put you on the birth certificate, you're not legally the father and if she's moved away and changed her name it may be impossible to locate her. What could you even do? And how would you really know you are the father? EDIT: Grammar
/r/MensRights12/11/13 08:32 PM
16

I'm going to hazard a guess and say he was arrested for rape because she was under the age of consent, not because he broke up with her. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 01:46 PM
4

I thought the same thing. 'Well you see after being raped, her boyfriend blamed her and started beating her, so she lashed out in self defence'. There's the true story right there /S
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:47 PM
2

I've spoken to people about it here before, but I'm in the UK so may be very different in the USA.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 09:48 PM
2

Would probably help to know what country you are from as it differs from place to place :)
/r/MensRights05/11/13 09:23 PM
3

Don't worry I know you wasn't asking the question, the article was. I just thought I'd pre-empt the debate ;)
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:48 PM
13

Definition of mutilation from Wikipedia - Mutilation or maiming is an act of physical injury that degrades the appearance or function of any living body, sometimes causing death. Definition of mutilate from dictionary.com - to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts. It's fair to say that all of the above definitions describe circumcision, so yes it IS genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:43 PM
2

Now what you just wrote was far more useful than that vague paragraph that basically made every man having a normal conversation with a woman suspicious.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 03:52 AM
8

I thought the same thing the first time I saw an interview of her.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 08:53 AM
0

Apart from the only reason female on male rape isn't in statistics as rape is because the definition of rape makes it almost impossible for a women to rape a man. Here's a couple of examples - 1. Women puts a gun to a man's head and makes him have sex with her, otherwise she'll kill him, NOT RAPE. 2. Woman drugs man and date rapes him while he is unconscious, NOT RAPE. See, see how it works? Try looking at the CDC report on sexual crime, it shows that the amount of women raped and the amount of …
/r/MensRights30/10/13 11:20 PM
2

What are you actually saying? Female on male rape and MGM should be ignored because you say they're not as bad as the gender reversal? Feminists keep redefining rape to include drunk sex etc, can't we redefine it to included when a women forces a man to penetrate her? In my country (UK) a women could drug a man with viagra and rohypnol, fuck his unconscious body without his consent AND IT'S NOT RAPE. Is that right? That exact thing happened to a male friend of mine. EDIT: Spelling
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:58 PM
2

I think it was trying to say that women don't rape as much as men and that MGM isn't as bad as FGM.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:51 PM
2

Obviously you don't have a penis.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:46 PM
2

That's not that bad, but would this one?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 08:52 PM
1

Ok, the post was taking about sex, not living like a slob in trash. And I'm not saying you can't disapprove of someone's lifestyle, it may not be for you, but being outwardly judgemental and shaming (which you insinuated with the comment "be prepared to deal with your choices") is just not right. You have the right to think something but that doesn't mean you have to shame someone.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 09:03 AM
4

You don't see a problem with posing as a Jewish person just to get a free meal? Don't you think it's slightly deceitful?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 08:54 AM
2

I'm not a "slut" but people should be able to make their own decisions, male or female, "slut" or not, it's up to them. I don't judge people, and slut shaming helps nobody, people can make their own decisions and live with them. So what if someone wants to sleep around, everyone should just get off their moral high horses.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 08:36 AM
3

I'm pretty sure you could get a ton horrible google search auto-complete results based around any group of people, including men. EDIT: And just because someone searches for something in google, it doesn't necessarily mean that is their personal opinion, it may be to research on a subject or collect information for an academic purpose.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 11:22 PM
2

I'm afraid that you're most likely right. Curing cancer would be great but surely it's easier to try to promote ways to prevent it, like eating healthy and eating the right foods. Unfortunately I can't see this happening over night; people have got too used to eating junk food and are not getting enough of the healthy stuff. In the UK the government has long been promoting eating 5 portions of fruit and veg a day to keep you healthy.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 08:49 PM
2

"Men can stop rape" NO, men don't rape; rapists rape.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 08:37 AM
1

Circumcision reducing the risk of HIV isn't a good enough reason. Even so there are contradictory studies in that regard.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 07:37 PM
12

It's completely unnecessary, just ask the male population of Europe who seem to be coping well with their foreskins still attached. I guess your from the USA where they seem to just lop off every babies foreskin indiscriminately (although it's becoming less and less). If you ask me it's just another way of corporations making money. I imagine it costs for the operation and then the hospitals sell those baby foreskins to cosmetic companies to make wrinkle cream predominately for women. Could you …
/r/MensRights27/10/13 09:39 PM
16

Being a citizen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland where we in the vast majority cases have an intact penis, it's pretty clear to me that my foreskin is incredibly sensitive especially where it joins the glans. Circumcision does in fact remove some of the sensitivity. Also removing the clitoris doesn't make women lose all stimulation, some yes, but not ALL.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 09:23 PM
1

This is pretty interesting. "In many cases, the police stress when they are appealing for a mother to come forward that she's not in any trouble, but they want her to seek medical attention," It's also interesting how they manage to put some of the blame on men. Although I'm NOT saying that couldn't be the case in some instances, but the mother is given excuses for her behaviour. EDIT: Forgot the NOT
/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:39 PM
0

Yeah no worries, I just googled some stories from the UK and the general narrative seems to be concern for the mother and getting her help (here). But I can honestly say I've seen news reports on TV where they've asked for the mother to come forward so she can be reunited with her baby. EDIT: I've scanned a few USA stories too, which give a very different tone, where the mother is seen as a fugitive.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:27 PM
2

Doesn't happen quite like that in the UK. I would imagine child services would get involved to find out why the mother abandoned the child but ultimately the aim is to get the mother and child back together. No criminal charges are made that I'm aware of. EDIT: spelling
/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:05 PM
2

Well, perhaps it might not be the case where you live. In MY country I've seen plenty of news reports on the TV where the reporter will be asking on behalf of the authorities for the Mother to come forward so she can be "reunited with her baby". So, yes, it does happen.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:35 PM
2

What annoys me is when a women dumps her baby in a bin/cardboard box or whatever, the first thing the authorities want to do is find the women to give her back her baby.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 12:06 PM
1

Best bet is find someone else.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 12:00 PM
1

I could understand if the slogan was 'Goes Down With a Fight'. But surely 'Goes Down Easy' suggests she's up for it, meaning CONSENT.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 10:21 PM
8

The article was posted on a forum sometime ago and there were comments from female vegans and vegetarians getting angry that a feminist wrote such a asinine article trying to rope vegan/vegetarianism into feminism. It seems like feminists are just trying drag other movements into their camp to bolster their numbers.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 10:08 PM
1

Yeah, it's very confusing indeed. "The ill treatment of animals makes the abuse of women tolerable." What? Since when does this happen? Where's the evidence to support this? The mind boggles.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 09:02 PM
25

I couldn't say if this particular story happened, but a very similar thing happened to a best friend of mine. His girlfriend lied about being pregnant and having a miscarriage. She called him saying she thought she might be having a miscarriage and had an appointment to go to the hospital during her lunch time. When he came off the phone from her he said to me that for some reason he didn't believe her. So he wanted to follow her from her work place to see if she went to the hospital. We followe…
/r/MensRights24/10/13 08:33 PM
10

I remember seeing this some time ago. So ridiculous. Some of the points in the article - Eating meat is associated with male power in its most vile and repugnant forms. The ill treatment of animals makes the abuse of women tolerable. Vegetarians, like feminists, care about language. Feminists and vegetarians share a common project of ending discrimination based on arbitrary distinctions. Feminists and vegetarians believe that the personal is political. (I have been a long time poster but I delet…
/r/MensRights24/10/13 07:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter