TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

southphillymamelah Archive

View 0 posts and 123 comments by southphillymamelah on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You are in a shitty situation with your sex, your body type, and your disability. I'm sorry for that. Your body may not touch the person next to you. You need to be more aware of your disability. A disinterested third party informed you that you did not register the distress of the person next to you due to your hearing loss. If I told a stranger not to touch me and they persisted, I would also resort to striking them in order to get them to stop touching me. Anybody has the right to do that. St…
/r/MensRights04/10/19 12:14 AM
1

Men and women ARE different, but so are many other groups treated equally under the law. We're going to either end selective service entirely or put females on the rolls eventually. It's not a very important issue to most men or women right now because it's been so long since America drafted anybody.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 08:40 PM
4

TWITTER IS NOT A GREAT PLACE TO SPREAD AWARENESS TWITTER IS A CESSPOOL
/r/MensRights06/09/19 07:17 PM
5

No laws were broken this time. Lawsuit time was LAST time, when he got $86,000 from the government after somehow proving that a social worker had falsely accused him of abuse. I wondered why the dude would cooperate with the the media on this sordid story, and then I read the story and realized that his actions are fueled by righteous anger against the state.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 05:35 PM
7

I wholeheartedly support the cultural trend towards showing beautiful naked people of both sexes on television. Now, the steroids and extreme dieting...
/r/MensRights27/08/19 11:46 AM
2

I'm glad this is being studied. I have an elderly relative who is a MAWF (although he's certainly not without family, just never-married and no kids). He cared for his own parents, who died at home. When he needed care, some if my cousins (whose beloved grandparents he had cared for!) saw "no option" but to put him in a nursing home, because they simply couldn't imagine altering the course of their own lives to care for him. My parents moved in with him. A few later, when my cousins' dad needed …
/r/MensRights19/08/19 11:38 AM
1

The drug cartels all have male figureheads but the real power is held by their feminist supervisors. It's not even 8am yet, and I've already reached Peak Internet for the day.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 11:24 AM
1

Doesn't look to be like anybody lost their minds. Two little assholes posted a rude note in the hallway, and the principal sent a letter home saying "this was just two little assholes, not an official notice from the administration." With regard to the dress code issue, my teenage sons enjoy displays of flesh but don't seem to have any problem getting their schoolwork done or treating females like human beings regardless of whether or not their bra straps are visible. I regard this as a largely …
/r/MensRights19/08/19 11:21 AM
2

Even somebody who has never had trouble finding a partner should be able to look at the situation in China or rural India and say "fuck, I don't want my grandchildren to have to live like that, better not unbalance our population." I do think that this technology should be legal, because at the end of the day I'm a zealous advocate of reproductive rights and thus obliged to live with the fact that other people don't consult my personal code of conduct while making their reproductive choices. But…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 09:39 AM
1

Adopt. It's not the easy life, but it's a great life.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 06:27 PM
1

DON'T GIVE PEOPLE YOU DON'T KNOW WELL CONTROL OVER YOUR FERTILITY. I mean, come on. Couldn't the Sun have found a couple of guys who were actually coerced into paying child support to feature in this article, rather than two men who uccessfully exercised (what I view as) their moral right to walk away and were not legally compelled to provide for the child? What other solution are these men looking for? What further remedy is the author advocating? Forced abortions?
/r/MensRights17/08/19 02:29 PM
1

That's a decent point. Maybe we can develop a body of case law where horrible behavior like this is defined as incitement to violence without unduly infringing on free speech. The whole thing makes me nervous, though. Free speech is a concept that the Left no longer seems to embrace (and I say this as an ardent leftist on most social issues).
/r/MensRights17/08/19 02:21 PM
1

I do have kids. One of the many things I teach them is that they are responsible for their own actions, no matter what other people say. Bullying is against the code of conduct for all American schools, and I am absolutely fine with bullies experiencing any consequence a school is empowered to impose.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 12:48 AM
-8

Zero, I hope. This case was ridiculous. We are talking about two similarly situated individuals exercising their right to free speech. You are allowed to believe that somebody should end their lives, and you are allowed to tell them so. What she did was loathsome, morally speaking. In my opinion. But the law does not exist to enforce my personal standards of moral conduct.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 09:26 PM
7

This story has a million holes in it. None of us will probably ever know the whole story, but reading this article, I find it entirely possible that the other side of the story is "woman breaks up with man who has serious mental issues, moves far away to protect child from the nutter she stupidly chose to get pregnant with, seeks relief from the courts when he contacts her sounding crazy as hell, and when he finally offs himself a tabloid newspaper article puts the blame on her."
/r/MensRights16/08/19 09:18 PM
14

Maybe he was the asshole back then, but as it's been 20 years and 3 kids, his brother is now the asshole for bringing that shit back up.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 10:18 AM
0

This headline seems deceptive to me. Disney/ABC told Balboa Productions that they were looking to greenlight female-focused shows in this upcoming production cycle. It's utterly normal for networks to focus on a particular niche like that when they perceive that their current offerings are weaker than those of the competition. I want to see the show made, but I'm content to have it made elsewhere. Don't we have enough actual grievances without twisting business decisions by for-profit companies …
/r/MensRights08/08/19 07:51 AM
2

I'd take that deal. I mean, not really, since it's an asinine way for a society to set and enforce moral standards - but there are days when it seems like both my daughters and my sons would be better off if men STFU about abortion and women STFU about circumcision.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 07:43 AM
2

Every time Safe Haven laws come up here, it seems as if people don't realize that while surrendering a baby is LEGAL, there no guarantee that the people involved won't be investigated and identified. In fact, social workers and cops always investigate off-the-street Safe Haven surrenders, because they occur in such desperate circumstances that they fully expect to find an incest victim dying of sepsis in a trailer somewhere. And when such crimes are discovered, the perpetrator is not immune from…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 04:18 AM
1

They'd probably care if stepdad LITERALLY pissed on them, but short of that...
/r/MensRights31/07/19 01:06 PM
1

Well, if he goes so far as to pee on your kids to mark them as his own, you can report that to Child Services.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 10:12 AM
1

You are saying that your kids are named Smith, and their mom and stepdad are both named Smith-Jones? That is some weird shit right there. I don't mind men changing their names upon marriage, especially if their birth name has negative implications for them (men, like women, can have shithead parents who they want to disassociate from), but I see why this particular arrangement is fucking with your head.
/r/MensRights31/07/19 09:54 AM
3

Oh look, it's just as bigoted and obnoxious when you reverse it!
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:56 PM
3

Using a foreign surrogate has always been risky - people have gotten hassled by immigration officials in both countries involved based on such jackassery as the surrogate being considered the legal mother (even if she carried a child born from a donor egg), and in one particularly horrible case, the surrogate's home country (I think it was India) tried to prevent a grieving father from taking his own biological child home because his wife had died while the surrogate was pregnant and their laws …
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:52 PM
2

The Kerala region has been the subject of several interesting studies - probably because it was so backwards for so long. By the time the 20th century arrived (in 1980 or so), people were interested in studying the transition. The unsurprising conclusions include "the industrial economy can actually be worse than the subsistence economy for families the lowest rung of the social ladder," "alcoholism sucks" and "women who can read are more likely to use birth control."
/r/MensRights22/07/19 06:16 PM
1

That would be a sound reason to ask the court for a modification of the original order - you can demonstrate that you've been stable for years, and that 3rd party supervision now entails an increased burden. And the cost of filing such a motion is going to be much less than a full-on custody battle.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 02:50 PM
1

Supervised visitation is good in a way - because if your ex doesn't adhere to the schedule, a neutral third party whose word is gold in court can attest to that fact, and your ex can't interfere with you giving her things. And getting visitation changed to unsupervised is one concession you might actually be able extract from the courts in a couple of years - higher courts have ruled that the cost of visitation at a center is onerous in most cases and thus abridges the child's right to a relatio…
/r/MensRights22/07/19 01:16 PM
1

How old is your daughter? If she's little, then mom controls her communications. Once she's older, that changes. The decisions about contact with you will be more and more her own. But she's not going to make the decision to endure possible hassles from Mom over texting with you if the groundwork for the relationship isn't laid now. In my opinion, based on the information you've given here, your time and energy and money should be going not into another legal battle, but into maximizing your tim…
/r/MensRights22/07/19 12:57 PM
2

Oh my God. OH MY GOD. Did you have a lawyer? If you did, and they allowed you to destroy your own case that way, I hope karma comes for them like a fucking freight train. You aren't going to get any form of physical custody during your daughter's childhood. Exercise your visitation, attend her school events, and as she grows up and has her own phone and computer, take advantage of the significant role that electronic communication plays in the lives of kids these days. You can talk to her on the…
/r/MensRights21/07/19 01:58 PM
9

Not an asshole if he's only dating casually, but seriously wrong about vasectomy reversal.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 11:51 AM
2

That's what you get for recruiting on the Internet. Ontaining a true representative sample of any cohort and administering a proper study is expensive and time-consuming. Getting click-thrus is cheap and easy.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:32 AM
0

This is more anecdata than data - the sample size is way too small and appears to be self-selecting. But if you wanted a sociologist to tell you that exploitative/deceptive behavior on the dating scene correlates with dark triad personality traits, well, OK. Stay the fuck away from people who send you unsolicited nudes, and stay the fuck away from people who request/expect an expensive first date. This seems like common sense to me.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:28 AM
2

I never changed a kid on a bar top (or any surface that is used to serve food), but other than that, yup, any flat surface that wasn't the nasty-ass bathroom floor was OK by me, if I was in a public facility that didn't offer me access to a changing table. I'm a mom, and even for us, things have really improved over the past couple of decades in the changing-table world. I used to commonly find myself in large public venues with no clean and private place to change or feed my babies. I'd like to…
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:09 AM
1

This case wasn't about paying/avoiding child support for either parent, but that's a central point in my conflict - if our society is going to allow women to make the fucked-up choice to be a single parent, then men should be able to make the same choice. The legal system emanating from a conservative worldview will tolerate single motherhood, but not single fatherhood. That's unjust, and cannot stand.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 05:24 PM
1

Well, and their kids. There were a few cases in the 90s, and a more recent case in South Carolina, where men who had truly been absent and uninterested during the entire pregnancy and adoption process managed to get finalized adoptions overturned without any evidence that they had ever wanted to take custody of the baby they created with a casual girlfriend. Screaming toddlers were ripped from their mothers' arms and handed to strangers. That can't be allowed to happen, it often fucks children u…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 05:07 PM
3

You have very succinctly described the fundamentalist/racist mindset at play here. Having committed the double sin of fornication and miscegenation, the pregnant woman's duty was to get the evidence of her transgression as far away from her community as possible, to be raised by people who would make sure she didn't grow up to be a fornicator. The agency found an interracial couple in another state who were fundamentalist Christians. Nothing excuses what this young woman did, but unless you have…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 01:16 PM
2

This was, indeed, posted to Reddit back when it happened. I lived a few towns over from this guy at the time, and it was big news in the child welfare world. The agency that facilitated the adoption is NOTORIOUS for their Jesus-freak weirdness and willingness to coerce single young people (mothers too, but mother have far more legal protection) into placing their babies for adoption with married Christian folks.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 01:08 PM
2

Much as I would love for parental leave (or any other single, concrete, achievable goal) to improve family relationships and lower divorce rates, this is bullshit. The cohort of American men who are given the option of parental leave in the first place belong to the group of people who have always reported higher levels of happiness in their relationships and divorced at a lower rate than the general population - college-educated, middle-class-or-higher, etc. I wish I could wave a wand and make …
/r/MensRights21/06/19 12:58 PM
0

All competent adult patients have sole responsibility (and thus, sole authority) for their non-elective medical decisions in the United States. Thank God. The pregnant person is the only person who has a legally recognized relationship with her obstetric care team. How could it be otherwise? She owns her body and decides what happens to it. Marriage does not change that legally, although there is obviously the personal aspect where most pregnant women who have a partner choose to have their part…
/r/MensRights08/06/19 02:08 AM
2

Medical proxies are a very smart contingency plan for when things go tragically wrong and the patient becomes incapacitated. I'm glad that your wife chose to obtain one. I did the same thing when I was pregnant - in fact, I took it one step farther and obtained a durable power of attorney. Your wife is not incapacitated, thank God, and hopefully will not become so. Please respect the fact that her doctors are treating HER, and that she has the entire legal responsibility for her prenatal care. I…
/r/MensRights06/06/19 03:45 PM
1

Your wife is the patient, not you. Accept this reality. She is having a baby, and you are along for the ride. You have no legal right to information from her doctors. They have every right, and every moral obligation, to confer with her privately. I agree with you that it's irritating for your wife to constantly be asked if she is in danger from you or anybody else. I got increasingly snippy with my obstetric practice until they stopped asking me such questions. But again, she's the patient. She…
/r/MensRights06/06/19 01:05 AM
1

Sure. The conflation of custody cases with abuse statistics was ALWAYS bullshit. Most people do not hurt kids. The mere fact that two adults are getting divorced does make either one of them a legitimate suspect for abuse or potential abuse. Judges should come down hard on this line of thinking, because it hurts children horribly to have either one of their parents falsely portrayed as dangerous.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 11:20 PM
0

Not really relevent. Most parents don't hurt their kids, period. Demonizing divorcing parents as potential abusers based on no evidence other than their gender has historically been a weapon used against fathers. Using it against mothers would be equally stupid.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 03:08 PM
1

This is the central flaw that I see - people who make the "primary caregiver" argument are assuming that maintaining the status quo of a typical married couple (i.e., Mom does more of the daily parenting and Dad does more if the daily breadwinning) is what is best for kids. In fact, divorce radically alters the status quo for kids, and a change in their parents' roles is necessary and beneficial.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 10:47 AM
2

Did you actually read the article you posted? Not all discussion of an issue is "complaining," even when it's women daring to have the discussion. I thought that was an interesting read, to the extent that any discussion of fashion can be interesting to me.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 09:40 AM
1

When it comes to out-of-wedlock pregnancies, there is no solution that's going to fully "sit right" with any thoughtful person. It's a bad scenario right out of the gate. But of all our shitty legal options, the one that seems least shitty to me is the one that gives both parties a chance to opt out of parenthood.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 10:15 AM
1

I absolutely agree with you. The idea that abortion is easily accessible is absolutely false. And the idea that a woman should choose abortion or adoption when her only barrier to raising the child is poverty is MORALLY REVOLTING. I'm just saying let's support her in parenting with our tax dollars, not chase down the rando she fucked and ruin his life and compel him to be a shitty father to a child he never wanted.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 03:01 PM
3

Exactly. I accept that society has to make provision for children whose biological parents can't/won't provide for them. I'd much rather spread that debt out over the whole taxpayer base than target a specific guy who happened to knock up a woman that he doesn't want to raise children with. He had no choice in whether she went ahead and had a baby. It's not "his" baby on the sense that he planned a pregnancy with his partner and committed to fatherhood. We're all better off when that unwilling r…
/r/MensRights30/05/19 12:30 PM
1

"True" doesn't reply apply to statements like "I don't want kids ever." It is something that people change their minds about. Everybody should feel absolutely free to change their minds about it at any point prior to actually having kids. I was not trying to criticize this poster for feeling that he had dodged a bullet, merely pointing out that the gun is pointed both ways when the issue of having kids becomes a point of conflict. It's equally good for both of these people that they parted ways …
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:28 PM
-3

That's probably how she feels, too. She might have spent the rest of her life childless if you two hadn't broken up.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 02:10 AM
3

Actually, that's exactly what he /u/Wsing1974 said. He knows a gay (male) couple where one of the dads does a good job playing the mom role. He's probably right that the much-loved kid of these men who planned their family is going to turn out fine. Much-loved kids who arrive as planned generally turn out fine. But as a general principal, I agree with you. No man can teach a child how to be a woman, no woman can teach a child how to be a man. Kids need a mom and a dad (or two moms and one dad, o…
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:38 PM
12

Don't worry, as soon as you see a poster in a public restroom telling you that beating women is bad, the urge will dissipate.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 10:58 PM
20

Everybody else who has ever had a relationship with this man says it would be completely out of character. Who STARTS beating women in his fifties?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 10:17 PM
1

I can't speak to what everybody else is doing, but this is what we are doing: The Cubs are co-ed, with everybody belonging to the same den/pack. The guy who heads up the Cubs has a female assistant. The kids work their badges together, do events like Kodiak and Pinewood Derby together, and attend camp together with gender-segregated tents and bathroom times. Next year, the Scouts will have two Scoutmasters, a man and a woman. They will meet at the same time, in the same room, doing the same stuf…
/r/MensRights12/02/19 01:09 PM
1

My daughters are in a troop - as Cubs, so they're integrated with the same Cubmaster. Next year, there will be two Scoutmasters (a married couple with both male and female children, awesome people) and while sleeping and bathrooms on their camping trips will be segregated, the reality is that the Scouts are going to work on their badges together. There will always be a female and a male adult present. I don't know if you'll consider this good news or bad news, but this is how one troop is handli…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:01 PM
39

This is BSA policy - seperate male and female troops with seperate Scoutmasters. It's to protect the adults from liability.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 06:52 PM
1

It is not. It is a pragmatic policy instituted by doctors who are not interested in getting sued by morons.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 10:15 PM
0

Drunk on experience with Family Court judges. I believe every word of this guy's story, and that's why I'm so appalled that he did some of the same shit that the crazies do.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 08:36 PM
-3

What you did was INSANE. You accidentally learned the new address of a woman who had explicity rejected you and moved out of your residence. Then you told her that you knew her address. Then you showed up there unannounced on her birthday to give her presents and take her out. Then you knocked on her door again when she had already told you to leave and that the police had been called. I believe you that you have never hurt your wife and are no threat to her. But you engaged in some behaviors th…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 11:59 AM
2

There was outcry last summer when it emerged that transgender prisoner Karen White – who was convicted of two rapes on women as Stephen Wood – had sexually assaulted two prisoners after being transferred to a women’s jail despite not undergoing any sex-change surgery. It's surprising that any of the prisoners survive, if the administrators are stupid enough to do something like this.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 12:59 PM
4

Ouch.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 08:43 PM
7

That part seems really weird to me. There are literally tens of thousands of Muslim physicians in the UK. They couldn't find ONE who was willing to perform (what s/he would see as) this important service to their community? Or they found one, but s/he was cartoonishly inept? I hate all forms of ritual genital mutilation and reject all justifications for doing it. But by Allah, if I were bound and determined to do it I would find a qualified practitioner.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 08:41 PM
2

Same thing that Catholic school means.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 08:34 PM
2

If geisha-type hostesses at bars and clubs aren't pathetic, this isn't pathetic. Personally, I think it's all pretty cringy - but I'm not Japanese.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 05:57 PM
1

I'm not sobbing. In point of fact, I'm pretty hardened to this reality, because you have to be, to work with this population. Again, Safe Haven is not a program for mothers only. And why don't you talk to some fathers who have been alienated from their children, made the choice to place their children for adoption, or simply walked away because they know they are too fucked up to raise a child. It's never easy. It's pain on a scale you cannot imagine.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 05:50 PM
2

I'm arguing that there is a very specific edge-case scenario here where you sound like an absolute dickwad arguing that ANY of the people involved are "privileged" compared to the other 99.999% of us who wouldn't even consider surrendering our children/grandchildren to a Safe Haven site.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 04:18 PM
8

The media coverage of that trial was a dumpster fire. Not surprised that the sentence is also ludicrous.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 02:46 PM
0

So useless.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 02:43 PM
2

I swear to you, no matter how much your life sucks right now, you are probably in a massively more privileged situation than the families who resort to Safe Haven.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 02:40 PM
1

There is no comprehensive research on this I can point you to. I can tell you, anecdotally, that in the part of Appalachia where I used to live, Safe Haven dropoffs were a subject of much discussion among social workers, because they were rare and the circumstances were generally so unsettling. Dropoffs were done by girls alone, women alone, girls/women accompanied by a man assumed to be the father, women accompanied by a man assumed to be the father AND grandfather, grandparents, and yes, by si…
/r/MensRights02/02/19 02:33 AM
0

A small percentage of the male college students (18%) said that their spouse's life would be more important. I would speculate that these young men are extremely entranced with pussy at this stage in their lives. They will probably grow up to be normal fathers who prioritize their children over everyone and everything else. The vast majority of all these people gave the sane answer.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 02:13 AM
3

I think you misread. The parent (female, in this particular survey) states that the lives of the children are more important than the life of their spouse. No shit, say parents of both sexes everywhere. It's not even a close call.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:36 PM
1

Get out of here with your reason and logic.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 09:54 PM
4

So a poorly designed study reached a conclusion that no decent father would have a problem with?
/r/MensRights01/02/19 09:49 PM
6

Widowers generally remarried, moved a female relative in, or had the oldest daughter assume the "mom" role. Single parenthood was NEVER socially normal when life was tougher, because it sucks and people used to realize that.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 09:47 PM
0

Men ARE allowed to do this. Safe Haven is not a mothers-only program. Now, if a guy shows up at a firehouse with a newborn, there is going to be an investigation to try and find the mother, because people who are fucked up enough to use Safe Haven are fucked up enough to let a teenager die of sepsis because she gave birth at home with no medical care. But the goal isn't to return the baby, it's to make sure the mother doesn't die because she and everybody around her are wanting to conceal the fa…
/r/MensRights01/02/19 09:36 PM
1

Two weeks isn't bullshit. A year is bullshit. That two-week period is an important layer of protection for families, particularly bio dads who may have no idea that their ex brought a baby to the fire station until they hear about it on the news. Parents, mostly very young mothers and fathers, do occasionally try to regain custody of a child on of them placed for adoption via Safe Haven. They are not simply handed the baby. They are assigned a social worker and have to prove that they can provid…
/r/MensRights01/02/19 09:30 PM
3

Being a drug addict is actually a GREAT reason to surrender a child to the state. It's neither gynocentric nor overly emotional to see a pair of healthy infants come into your fire station, knowing that they will be immediately placed with loving parents who have been waiting for a child, and feeling the desire to praise the person who was willing to un-fuck her babies' lives even though she's currently not willing/able to un-fuck her own.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 08:54 AM
1

The risk of deprivation is preferable to the certainty of deprivation. A person who is thinking of their child's best interests, rather than their own, assumes the risk that a conflict with the other parent may cause them pain in some hypothetical future scenario. A person who would protect their own best interests at the expense of their child should not become a parent. I'm not trying to make single parenthood illegal, I'm just pointing out that it's a shitty, selfish choice, not some sort of …
/r/MensRights29/01/19 09:37 PM
1

And your willingness to deliberately create a child who has no mother. So financial prosperity + being as stupid and selfish as a woman who deliberately deprives her child of a father = reproductive worthiness? Yeah, I guess so.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 07:39 PM
13

Wait, the color is a problem, but the fact that all of these shoes IMPAIR ONE'S ABILITY TO WALK is not? I mean, people should wear what they want in any case,but it seems to me that Marie Claire missed the low-hanging fruit here.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 03:27 PM
1

... and female judges have less of a problem with sentencing disparities.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:04 AM
1

You poor sweet summer child. It's a beautiful video. Ugly people will project their ugliness onto it.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:00 AM
2

Yes, things have improved. Quite markedly in my adult life. No, it's still not equal.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:54 AM
1

It's way more OK to be a woman at home than a man at home. In either case, a rational person still chooses their kids' best interests, but it's way, WAY easier if you're the mom.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:51 AM
0

Well, some guys who claim to be straight have indicated that they want this one. Why does that bother you? This is a blog post about the experiences of a transgender person who enjoys various kinds of kinky sex. Nobody, least of all the author, has any expectation that you will touch a penis.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:19 PM
2

You seem to be a lot more upset than they about their penis. I'm not saying that no trans person has ever been unreasonable on this subject - but what this person wants (respectful treatment from their sex partners, not to be touched without their consent) is simply not problematic.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 01:32 PM
2

Where's the bashing? This person is describing their own experience with various kinds of group sex-play scenarios. I see zero contempt for people based on their sexual preferences, zero sense of entitlement to sexual attention from any other person, and really, a fairly generous attitude towards people who have said or done dumb things in response to finding out that this person was born male and now lives as a woman.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:05 AM
5

I think you're conflating cheating with the consensual practice of a sexual kink. Men do seem to report a higher incidence of cuckold fantasies, i.e. watching another person have sex with their partner. But whether it's a woman or a man having the fantasy, it's very different than having a secret affair. None of it is my cup of tea, but one behavior is ethical and one absolutely isn't.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:40 AM
9

I loathe the notion of putting my husband and child's DNA in any system. I'm selfishly glad that I had my kids in the era of husband=daddy. But now that a majority of daddies aren't husbands, we have to come up with another approach. Paternity fraud is genuinely quite rare, even among women who do not marry and have a succession of children with different men, but it's such a huge deal that we cannot use the honor system to manage the issue. We have to do something.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 01:26 PM
35

Because it's clear who the mother is, and nobody but the mother actually knows who the father is. When a couple is married, the husband is the legal father until and unless he brings a legal challenge disputing paternity. One can argue that these laws should be changed, but as it stands now, it makes total sense that the husband of a woman who has just given birth is allowed to fill out legal paperwork on behalf of the child. His legal responsibilities as a father kicked in as soon as that child…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 12:47 PM
1

I'm suggesting that the data may not be as accurate as you think it is. Sociological data is difficult as fuck to gather, because we rely so much on self-reporting. When I look at the suicide stats (which are, sadly, very easy to obtain and very hard to misinterpret), I cannot help but believe that the social and emotional struggles of men are being under-reported. I know men who sincerely DGAF about their appearance or what anybody outside their family and close friends thinks of them - but the…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 12:50 PM
1

Great, now I'm following a plus-sized male model on Instagram. Those guys are like tall women who used to model for Lane Bryant and other fat-lady stores - not a typical whippet-lean clothes horse, but more large all over than fat. Now Lane Bryant has actual fat women modeling their clothes, which frankly makes sense if the goal is to see what the clothes look like on.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 11:31 AM
1

Men are not (generally) walking around trying to be perceived as disagreeable. They are trying to be perceived as strong and confident, which can have a component of disagreeability. If you think that every young guy out there who appears to be genuinely confident in himself with nothing to prove is not internally fretting about how well his IDGAF schtick is working, you vastly underestimate their acting skills. The jury is still WAY out on human behavioral tendencies, because it is a huge and c…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 11:25 AM
5

Did the US center-right ever deny the existence of hypergamy? It seems to me that they've consistently pointed out that men who wish to be selected for marriage need to be able to protect and provide for a family.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 01:24 PM
5

Are you nuts? Men who are not perceived favorably by women can't reproduce. These issues manifest differently, but young men (pre-reproduction) are incredibly concerned about their image. They're just not trying to be perceived as agreeable, because that's not what works for young men as a mating strategy.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 01:01 PM
2

This is a bigger issue than a few hundred men who want to put women in cages (not in a hot way). People actively suicide bating each other is dangerous and is a much bigger issue than the suggested prospect of nationalized sex slaves in the west. Thank you for articulating this so well. I knew that I was more worried FOR these guys than ABOUT them, and now I know why. They're in no position to do me any harm, but they sure as shit can destroy their own lives. It's such a waste.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:02 PM
1

Wow.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 10:41 PM
1

Wow.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 10:40 PM
1

As did I. Find somebody who wants to do it with you. If you can't, or won't, don't replicate the worst mistake single women make by selfishly depriving a baby of its other parent.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 09:58 PM
2

Then you aren't cut out for parenthood, period. You think getting legally and emotionally entangled with another adult is complicated and risky? A child (bio or adopted) is 1000x. It's worth it, but it's not for everyone.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 09:57 PM
1

I'm also old, and have biokids in addition to adopted. Their other parent is my spouse and lives in the house and parents them equally. This is how a responsible person creates life.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 09:42 PM
1

I hear you. I actively encourage single people to foster or adopt waiting children, at home or abroad - one parent is a hell of an improvement over zero parents. When it comes to deliberately creating a child who will not have a legal second parent, I think that's pretty unethical. It's something that people do to gratify their own egos - this is MY kid, with MY genes, and s/he belongs to NOBODY BUT ME. Every part of the decision is adult-centered.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 09:34 PM
2

That's a question you can ask prior to taking placement of a waiting child.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 09:30 PM
0

When women say that, we excoriate them - and rightly so. I hope your child has two loving parents.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 09:29 PM
2

I WISH this was true - because I would be launching my children into a better society if every woman selected a husband who could support a family and was also interested in raising one.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 08:03 PM
10

Misleading title, this was months of harassment with continued escalations after a very clear written communication that the romantic pursuit was unwanted and was making the target uncomfortable. After another escalation at her workplace, her boss initiated the complaint.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:42 PM
2

I'm Jewish, and active in my opposition to MGM, and I get sent links to this disgusting comic fairly often: https://goo.gl/images/WGHQrn Now, because I am active in the anti-circ community, I know that this kind of garbage is fringe, and most anti-MGM people have zero special interest in Jews and are, in fact, aiming their efforts more at the much-larger American gentile population who still circumcise and might possibly be talked out of it. But if you are a Jewish person with no particular inte…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:30 PM
-2

So, he's staying with a woman he doesn't love, encouraging her to put financial and emotional resources into his children from a previous marriage, all the while plotting to leave her if he gets a higher-paying job? Financial abuse of women is more common than you think, and that's what your friend is doing.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 01:43 AM
8

Please don't post such trash. Oprah owns the house, her dad is divorcing his wife, she's selling the house. People can (and do) make any insane allegation they wish to in court filings, and the gutter press publishes such things to make money.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 01:39 AM
24

http://www.nationalchildsupport.com If somebody who owed my child almost 60 grand paid then $1.09, I might be pissed enough to employ a private collections agency. They do it on contingency and take a percentage of what they collect.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:00 PM
4

Bingo. The BSA (which I admire, support and am proud to have my children participate in) is considering a Chapter 11 in order to avoid paying ruinous settlements to the (male) victims of a profligate (male) molester who did his damage decades ago. The Mormons pulling out in order to keep gay men out of their organization isn't helpful - that was a moral choice the BSA made that really took a toll - but the bigger financial issue is this particular molesting asshole. I hope he dies a miserable de…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:47 PM
1

Oh, I wasn't trying to say that it was good or ideal. I don't want to be a primary subsistence farmer in the developing world while my husband helps me and also does something more hazardous on the side so our kids won't starve. And you're right, I should have looked it up before I made a claim that newer studies apparently contradict. I was bemused at the notion that agriculture could been seen as a "male-only" space where women are intruding. That's just nuts, particularly in the UK where the …
/r/MensRights17/12/18 04:01 AM
1

The majority of farmers in the world are women. Most of them don't farm in the UK and sure as fuck don't do it as a hobby - but if a group of primarily hobbyist livestock enthusiasts in the UK want to have a posh dinner and give each other awards, fine. Don't give out awards to people who aren't welcome at your event, unless you want to be called out for your idiocy.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 03:21 AM
1

The difference between saying that somebody should "die a miserable death" and making an actual death threat seems very clear to me. I wished that fate on a guy who ran a stop sign a few days ago.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 01:54 AM
1

I've been saying this for years. If the dad isn't going to be acting as a parent (either because he's an unofficial donor or because you got knocked up by a man who who doesn't want to be involved), don't put him on the birth cert and don't tell anybody in a position of authority what his name is. You can tell your kid privately without giving the state a stick to beat you with years later. I have seen social workers go to ridiculous lengths, including threatening to withhold Medicaid for childr…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 01:42 AM
3

That does seem likely. Of course, here in my city, a male prof who recently called for "a free Palestine from the river to the sea," which is literally a terrorist slogan, is keeping his job. He did have to tell the reporters that he doesn't support the extermination of Jews, and he had to look really sincere while he was saying it. Mostly, I want the public to ignore the legal-but-stupid shit that professors say outside the classroom. They're doing it for attention. If we don't respond to their…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 12:03 PM
-1

This wasn't a threat. What a crock of shit. Don't give the prof tenure if you don't like how she behaves, but Jesus Christ, don't punish her for wrongthink.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 01:48 AM
1

Lots of reasons including a general cultural shift away from participation in civic organizations, but the BSA's huge problem at the moment is that the victims of a Catholic-priest-level serial molester are suing the shit out of the organization. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna948181
/r/MensRights15/12/18 10:55 AM
1

Both parents are shitbirds, in different ways. That poor kid.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 07:33 PM
4

You'll get a lot of negative comments on this post - some of them legitimately concerned about a young man newly cognizant of his value as a protector running afoul of a society that attacks its protectors, and some of them straight-up resentment of a young man who has found satisfaction in taking on a traditionally masculine social role. My advice is to listen politely and then shrug it all off. You know what you were born to be, and you can't be anything else and still be happy with yourself, …
/r/MensRights10/12/18 01:48 PM
-10

You heard me. I'm not in the least surprised by this allegation, Tyson gives me the strong impression that he doesn't have good boundaries with women.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 07:27 PM
-12

I enjoy Neil deGrasse Tyson very much as an educator and entertainer. I would leave him alone with my children without hesitation. I would not be alone with the man myself. He's a Nice Guy. Not a pedo, not a forcible rapist. But not a safe person for a woman to let her guard down around, either. Something's a little bit broken about that guy.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 06:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter