TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

sunset261 Archive

View 0 posts and 159 comments by sunset261 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

$900,000 a year for CHILD SUPPORT? WHAT THE FUCK IS SHE FEEDING THESE KIDS? That's 300,000 per kid per year, which is way more than the vast amount of adults working full-time make.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 09:21 PM
–

Gender and sex are synonymous. There is no difference. There are social roles that we construct around gender but those are gender roles, not gender itself.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:24 AM
–

This happens with pretty much every feminist. I had a feminist teacher in college who went on all about sexual objectification of women, and when she said she was excited to see Magic Mike i say "hey isn't that kind of hypocritical?" and her response was basically "well men have been doing it to us for forever so now it's our turn."
/r/MensRights24/07/15 06:06 PM
2

It's also interesting because the belief that women who lie about rape don't exist is the reason behind many of the racist lynch mobs in the old south. In reality feminists have more in Common with racial lynch mobs than they do true liberalism.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 11:53 PM
2

but we’d also resolve a seemingly intractable tension between the Second Amendment and security. but see then you'd have a bit of a hang-up with that pesky 14th amendment and it's annoying Equal Protection Clause.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 06:52 AM
–

the article links to another thing written by the same woman it's its fucking awful. https://archive.is/DvkJe I wrote to my teen titled "Son, It's Okay If You Don't Get Laid Tonight" I just read that shit and holy fuck if I were her son I'd cut ties with her immediately And yet, the reality is that even with everything I’ve taught you, you are still capable of committing rape. Not because you’re some kind of testosterone-driven monster on the inside, but because you’re at the center of swirling …
/r/MensRights01/07/15 05:09 PM
–

I guess we obviously have different opinions on what a healthy reaction is. I don't think boys that were negatively affected by an experience like that are 'less healthy' for their being bothered by it. I'd actually consider that more normal. I think you might misunderstand my point a bit. My point was that, yes being bothered by it would also be a healthy reaction, but treating them like they're a monster akin to someone who rapes someone at knifepoint is not. A healthy reaction would be a reac…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:20 PM
–

The thing is, most men won't report it because, unless they're already in a relationship a man's reaction to waking up to something like that is "well there are definitely worse things to wake up to." Men are taught to have a level head about sexual acts and have a reasonable and healthy reaction to violations of their sexual boundaries. Minor violations, such as waking up to a woman sucking your dick if you're a single man, will warrant a much less serious response than somebody physically forc…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 04:15 PM
13

"male issues need are taken seriously while women's issues need to aren't listened to" they say as they actively prevent people from discussing men's issues.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 03:31 AM
–

There was also one where the fight a radfem villain called "Femme Fatale" who constantly spouts shit about there not being enough female superheroes or women not being on money and shit.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 02:20 AM
–

How the hell do they object to the word "Bolshevik" an insult when they literally have a hammer and sickle as their logo?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:02 AM
–

she didn't but that's clearly the reason.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:45 PM
–

i made the name French because French is artsy jesus fucking christ this woman.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 03:15 PM
16

So she has a position on an ESPN sports discussion show, he's unemployed and she still gets mad at him for paying half of the bill and not the full bill? what the fuck? How entitled can someone be?
/r/MensRights10/05/15 08:33 PM
–

This is old as shit why is it being posted?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 04:47 PM
2

Does she really think that men aren't taught that Chess is uncool? Of course they are, they just don't care.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 10:34 PM
3

my name is Misti Love because that's not a huge red flag or anything.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 04:07 AM
3

Men legitimately can do more damage, on average, than women. well no shit. but here we have a lanky-ass man who's likely about on par with that woman in terms of strength. So women should be able to abuse men as much as they want but as soon as a man who's likely just as weak grabs her to keep her from hitting him, then he's the abuser and he can't fight back? Therefore all people deserve to have unequal protection from assault from a male aggressor um no. Sorry but your logic doesn't follow. Pe…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:58 AM
6

Happily for you, this may mean that your date doesn’t automatically assume you’ll pay for everything just because you’re a man. However, if you enthusiastically seize on this one feminist principle above all others to avoid footing the bill, you’re likely to come across as stingy rather than principled. "I'm not saying you should have to pay the bill, but you should pay the bill."
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:00 PM
9

I guess black people can't be democrats because republicans freed the slaves.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 04:10 PM
1

The same journalist who had talked to the police finally got in contact with the FBI and they said they knew about it. no, they said they were in communication with Sarkeesian. Not that it's about the threats, in all likelihood the communication with the FBI is more likely to be in relation to the whole CP debacle.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 05:20 PM
–

No. It's feminists and SJW who constantly fret over portrayals of women. Don't become like them.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:17 PM
2

not mental illness alone since most of the mentally ill are not violent. well of course. After all there are many different kinds of mental illness. Someone who suffers from alzheimers may not be terribly prone to violence. But one with Psychosis may easily be prone to violence. His self-absorbedness and his delusions of persecution are all hallmark of Psychosis and he was even perscribed anti-psychotic pills which he refused to take. As much as feminists might have you believe that his beliefs …
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:44 AM
1

The vast majority of women are perfectly fine people. It's only a select few who would ever do shit like that. Same with men and rapists. Treat people on an individual basis. If they haven't done anything to make you scared of them, treat them as warmly as you would anybody else. Don't let paranoia cloud your judgement. That only results in shit like #Yesallwomen.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:14 PM
7

thisman will stop trying to interrupt you see. This is how they think. They think women deserve to have the dominant voice in everything and anything you do against a woman is sexism. Interrupt a woman? sexism. As if men are never interrupted by women. thisman knows that he may never understand what it's like to experience your life as a woman and yet people like this seem really eager to tell men exactly what they are taught and how they are raised.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:54 AM
4

It's just a big fat lie these people make up to pin on the straight white male boogeyman. Nobody I've ever met has felt this way, it's just another lie feminists use to demonize men.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:33 PM
–

we've literally got to the point where it's not PC anymore to call mass murderers crazy. I'm so fucking done.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:02 AM
2

I've gone through the same shit as this guy. No action whatsoever from girls. someone with low self-esteem will view girls not liking them as the default and anything else as a privilege. People with severely low self-esteem want affection but they don't feel that anybody owes it to them. This guy thought he was amazing and that by not liking him, women had somehow maligned him or hadn't given him what he was due. This guy was self-obsessed to the max. Severely fucked in the head completely inde…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:09 PM
–

It's probably some SJW trying to desperately link men's rights to the recent shooting.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:44 PM
3

How bout you do some research OP. A five second google search showed me that the lady named in the lawsuit isn't the one who filed the report and that it was actually a hoax lawsuit being made by a male inmate with a history of these sorts of things.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 03:48 PM
5

This is a complete misapplication of the Fallacy of Division and is a misunderstanding of what it is. The fallacy basically amounts to: Trees are sturdy Trees have water therefore water is sturdy what this moron is essentially doing is taking you using sound reasoning: Men are privileged Thomas is a man Therefore Thomas is privileged. and essentially telling you that it's a fallacy when it's not. It's common A=C, A=B, therefore B=C.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 04:47 PM
2

no. If we're talking about Boko Haram, they oppose western education for both genders. But in other cases, like the Taliban, they specifically try to keep women from education because they believe a woman's place is in the home.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 02:51 PM
2

If you don't have a car, try applying for a job at a place that's either within walking/ biking distance or that you could easily take public transportation to get to.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 08:58 AM
4

basically the gist of this is men aren't allowed to have physical standards of attractiveness women don't have any physical standards of attractiveness fat women the only people who don't get any action despite the fact that she willfully admits that any woman can get laid any time they want.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:54 AM
3

Nice deflecting. You can't argue the point so you dance around it.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 10:16 AM
2

why has nobody responded with reverence and sympathy, advocacy and support for male victims? because inflated numbers are inflated numbers. And artificially inflating the numbers of rape victims does nothing more than create hysteria about the crime resulting in men being found guilty on nothing more than hearsay and feminists using the statistics to paint men as potential rapists.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 10:14 AM
–

I stopped reading here. more like "i gave up on arguing here." Anybody with half a brain would take a statistic like that with a grain of salt.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 10:09 AM
–

So how much time exactly have you spent researching and talking to people about sexual assault? i don't need to. Anybody with basic observational skills can see the absurdity of a claim like that. Yes those numbers are ludicrous but not for the reasons you think. what are you even talking about? what "reasons you think?"All i said is that the numbers are clearly absurd to anyone with a lick of common sense.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:56 AM
–

Because to anyone with any experience of the real world, those numbers are completely ludicrous. Think of all of the women you know, do you seriously think a third of them were molested as children? If someone came up with a statistic that said "1 in 3 men will knife someone in their lifetime." you would see up-front the ridiculousness of such a claim.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:26 AM
–

What is the incentive to downplay the rape of females we don't. But the statistic that "1 in 3 girls are sexually abused before the age of 16" is completely absurd and flies in the face of all common sense.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 02:11 AM
11

This is terrible. He pretty much goes on saying shit like "almost all sluts who claim they were raped are lying." and even says that she wasn't sexually assaulted besides him having no knowledge of the case in question. this is the kind of stuff that makes MRAs look bad.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:52 AM
1

Sorry, i don't see anywhere she encourages people to make false accusations. Sure she's trying to broaden the definition of rape and that is a bad thing, but that kind of headline is severely sensationalist and borders on libel.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:22 PM
1

Might work for arguing the influence of feminine styles of the time period, but not of the femenization of men through art. why would you separate the two? http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/1993.387.8 http://www.artbronze.com/images/products/detail/MercuryAttachinghisWingsmarbleoriginal1.jpg http://www.friendsofart.net/static/images/art1/christophe-veyrier-dying-achilles.jpg https://www.artrenewal.org/artwork/007/7/23/le_ravissement_de_psyche-large.jpg i can keep going with this shit. M…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 01:12 AM
1

what is not feminine about it? The pose and facial features are about as feminine as it gets. also: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f0/Donatello_-_David_-_Floren%C3%A7a.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Charles_Beauclerk,_1st_Duke_of_St_Albans.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Philip,_Lord_Wharton.jpg http://s017.radikal.ru/i420/1111/fd/275f09f56fcat.jpg http://www.thevintagemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/charles-1st-duke-of-richmond.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 02:48 AM
1

maybe YOU should go to an art museum for once. http://lorriemiller.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/p1010016.jpg
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:14 AM
1

you do indeed have a right to get upset about every little thing, that doesn't mean you should.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:07 AM
–

you do not have a right to not be offended.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 11:15 PM
5

Um have you actually looked at David? yes -muscular but still lean -excellent hair -large eyes with visible pupils -tiny mouth -high jawline he certainly is no Hercules that's for sure http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/94.9.1 feminization of the male form in art is something by no means new or recent.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 11:14 PM
6

I'm not a fan of the feminization of male beauty in art these days. male beauty in art has been pretty feminine since pretty much forever, just look at Michelangelo's David. Not a single male character here has facial hair. Not even when it would make sense, like with Maleficent. why would they? Maleficent didn't have facial hair. If they gave the gender swap version facial hair it would just end up looking less like the character.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 08:26 PM
–

All this misandry in the media is just an illusion then. We should close this reddit because we are too obsessed with every detail you know. no, but you should stop looking for reasons to get offended by something. This guy is not only doing exactly what feminists do, but he's also blatantly misrepresenting things. There's a lot more pressing issues in the world than worrying about a mediocre movie about cartoon birds.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 08:08 PM
–

Have you actually watched the video? Did you see the extent to which this was pushed in the movie? better yet. I watched the movie and half of what he said is straight up bullshit. All three of the children were involved with the firework thing and nobody got upset about it because it's a cartoon where getting badly burned amounts to having your face covered in black powder and walking away unharmed. This guy is reading way too much into shit. The guy Jewel was "flirting with" as evidence of "fe…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 05:17 AM
–

though it would make me very happy to blame that event on those people, I don't actually know if those people caused this event. right, it's just pure coincidence that fire alarms have gone off at multiple MRA events at universities that had feminist mobs trying to disrupt them... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWgslugtDow ...and then subsequently cheering when the fire alarm is pulled.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:23 AM
8

It's only being practiced in fundamentalist Islamic countries, and a handful of third world hell holes. protip: In some 3rd-world hell-holes male genital mutilation can be way worse. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penile_subincision
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:27 PM
4

same exact thing happened at my university too.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 05:58 PM
27

The sketch would have been better if they tried to make fun of what MRAs actually believe or do but instead the whole "I shut down 2 planned parenthoods." shit just made me go "what?" since when have MRAs campaigned against planned parenthood or female reproductive rights? they might as well have gone "yes I'm an MRA and I recently went to a KKK rally."
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:13 AM
-2

pretty sure it's supposed to be a joke. Now a man would never get away with joking like that but still.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 09:51 PM
3

matriarchy sorry. This is just ridiculous. There is no Patriarchy. There is no Matriarchy. There is just deeply ingrained societal biases. When you start using terms like "matriarchy" you become just as bad as the feminists who insist there's a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:06 PM
0

but only ~15% of Congress is male, so men have little power to influence what happens. Wrong, men would have the power of voting for candidates that they feel represent them on those issues. People often fail to recognize that the core of the power structure in any constitutional republic is its people. Men and Women in congress are not there to represent their gender, they're there to represent the people no matter what sex, color, religion, or orientation. Imagine seeing a few more men start t…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 07:10 AM
–

Walt Disney was an anti-communist, not an anti-semite.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 12:58 AM
-2

man. people who posted those comments or upvoted them should be ashamed. regardless. those pricks are still in the vast minority here and /pol/ probably had more to do with the flood of false reports than /r/MRA did.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 01:26 AM
-9

and the evidence for these "hundreds of false rape accusations" is?
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:26 AM
9

Joking about rape is never okay. it's a joke for fuck's sake. if people can make jokes about Nazis and the KKK, rape shouldn't be off-limits.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:12 PM
3

This entire article is just flat out ridiculous. Nowhere in the letter does it mention that the sender is male or the recipient is female. it's also a fill in the blanks form, meaning that you pick from a pool of words to customize the letter for yourself.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 03:30 AM
2

according to merriam-webster dictionary Violent. adj. using or involving the use of physical force to cause harm or damage to someone or something nothing to see here folks, just another case of Feminists making up definitions for words they don't understand.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 08:09 AM
5

condescending idiots are the worst kind of idiots.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:36 PM
-3

I'm not saying "all women are privileged" except that's precisely what you are saying when you talk about "female privilege". you are saying that they are privileges enjoyed by women as a gender Where did I suggest that all women are to blame? nowhere but you are focusing on women rather than the justice system when you talk about "female privilege" how about instead of "female privilege" say " judicial bias against men" or "inequalities that disfavor men" framing it as "X privilege" doesn't hel…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 08:47 AM
-2

In certain cases, people are better off just for being a certain gender. This is not some vague, subjective theory like "patriarchy" or "internalized oppression" that only exists on tumblr. Gender, class, and race privilege (among others) can all be demonstrated, quantified, and proven. For example, the U.S. justice system's anti-male bias has been well-documented, but not widely reported. Women, on average, can expect to receive 25% shorter sentences and are about 40% less likely to receive jai…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 06:07 AM
-3

because you're perpetuating that attitude that a person is inherently better-off just for being a certain gender, which is the exact same tactic feminists use to try to paint women in general as victims.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 03:54 AM
-21

But of course, female privilege doesn't actually exist, right? stop it. going on about "gender privilege" makes you no better than a feminist.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 10:30 PM
6

shes just bopping him lightly on the forehead. get over yourself. people who complain about this shit only make MRAs look just as whiny as feminists who complain about damsel in distress tropes.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:50 PM
0

You're combative, aggressive, and not pleasant to talk to and you act like you aren't "we don't really get well written characters kn video games period" "your post isn't worth a reply but yeah we do! I'd give you a list but your just gonna move the goalposts" "then name them" The Joker, Glados, wheatley etc. "what? how are those well-written? many of them, especially the Joker are about as 1-dimensional as it gets" "WELL WHERE'S YOUR PEER REVIEWED STUDIES SMARTYPANTS? JEEZ LOOK HOW BIASED YOU A…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 12:24 AM
1

Name calling now? Sure sign of someone who has run out of anything worth saying. Good day. AKA "you called me a bad word therefore your argument is invalid" sure sign of someone who can't respond to the actual points being made.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 10:01 PM
3

sorry to rain on your parade but both men and women suffer from breast cancer, albeit in smaller numbers. testicular cancer and prostate cancer are male exclusive. If you want to look at female-only cancers use cervical cancer or ovarian cancer.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 07:14 PM
0

No, you're right. You've presented a very well supported claim. You have shown no bias or subjectivity at all I get that this is sarcasm but opinions are inherently subjective and biased you retard and your peer reviewed studies supporting this have been an eye opener. yes clearly opinions must be supported by peer reviewed studies. Thank you for your in depth analysis of video game characters thank you for yours. you clearly provided so much evidence that they were well-written. I am sure it wi…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 06:45 PM
0

There is no way any answer would have been good enough. that would be because there aren't really any well-written video game characters.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 03:57 AM
0

I could give you a list full. However I'm concerned that you wouldn't accept them as "legit" for some reason. Or, to put it another way, "move the goalpost." The Joker: Batman Arkham Asylum/City seriously? the joker? as in the one who never has any character development and just does evil shit for the sake of being evil? that's well-written to you? clementine- walking dead never played it wheatley and glados one is just comic relief and the other is semi comic-relief. they're not intricate or nu…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 07:18 PM
1

I don't agree. I think what tends to happen is that people focus on certain genres and then generalize across the industry. There are very well done games out there, but they're conveniently discounted when one wants to make the argument that the game industry is broken. give me ONE well-written character from a video game. The Walking Dead, it would make just as little sense to not include well written female characters in there, since we know that it is based on our world. so is "there will be…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:34 PM
1

Why would I not want a diverse mix of well written characters in my video games? Personally, I think that would be a great improvement. we almost never get ANY well-written characters in ANY video games let alone a diverse mix of them. also, if a game not catering to your target demographic is too much for you, then make a game yourself. Games aren't fucking race and gender parliament. not having each demographic in equal portions is not inherently an issue or a flaw, just a sign of who the larg…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:52 AM
0

Nobody gives shit. it's video games. If you care that much about gender representation in video games just take the stick out of your ass and beat yourself with it.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 07:00 PM
2

no. The study you are referring to were FBI reports about the amount of rape reports that are "unfounded". It doesn't include rape claims that were never reported to police. It doesn't include those who were tried and found not guilty. It doesn't include those that are found to be completely false after charges are pressed. It doesn't include those exonerated after being found guilty. Even then not all "unfounded" claims are inherently false. Also the criteria for determining what is "unfounded"…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:46 PM
4

same with my experience. Our readings were almost always about Feminism or women's issues. It often got a bit heated between me and the teacher. One time we we're on the subject of Bill Clinton cheating and I got to piss her off by saying "well his wife is Hillary Clinton so I don't really blame him."
/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:00 PM
4

This statistic is including the estimated rapes that are unreported. If it was never reported then there was no criminal investigation. If there was no criminal investigation we can't know whether or not a rape actually occured in those instances.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 04:24 PM
75

out of every 100 rapes only 3 in them result in the accused going to prison. only 9 will ever lead to trial gotta love the retardation here. Apparently every time a woman says a rape happened that means it absolutely 100 percent did. it also assumes that that everyone being accused of rape is automatically guilty, even if the police drop the charges because there's no evidence it actually happened.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 03:49 AM
4

My response is usually Mary I of England.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 11:16 PM
1

stop this shit. going on about "gender privilege" makes you just as bad as the feminists.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 07:44 PM
3

It's not rape unless she slipped something into his drink. the while "x person GOT MY FRIEND DRUNK" is disingenuous. Unless your friend had alcohol forcibly poured down their throat a-la North by Northwest, they got THEMSELVES drunk. They had sex with someone and regretted it. That is not rape. unless the person had some kind of drug slipped into their drink, it was drunken sex that they regret, not rape.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:36 PM
9

it's an insult. get over it. You don't see any of us whining when people call eachother "dicks" do you?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:46 AM
40

rape being totally not a big deal are you fucking serious? rape is treated like a huge thing on this subreddit and misandry being a real life thing that really does exist and isn't the single most cockamamie concept ever yes because women don't receive shorter prison sentences for the same crimes, family court is completely fair to men, men aren't convicted of rape on zero evidence, and there isn't a disproportionate amount of attention paid to domestic violence against women compared to domesti…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:43 AM
7

fraud how? she raised money to produce a series of videos and has delivered. 2 videos. out of a series that was supposed to be out a year ago. what the fuck did she even spend the money on? motion graphics? is the "perspective" that a subculture notoriously unsafe for women is full of shitty people? are you fucking kidding me or have you never played a game online before? 90 percent of the time guys will be all over the girl trying to win her favor just because she has a vagina. Also EVERYONE ge…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:36 AM
0

it is absurd to claim purging the web of child abuse images is a slippery slope to censorship funnily enough http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/jul/22/david-cameron-crackdown-internet-pornography
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:15 PM
0

it says "how many messages a man gets a week" not "how many messages a man gets a week from women attracted to him" it could just be that people who make more money are likely managers or business-owners and they get more messages because of what their job entails. you're a fool to think that this says anything about women. Also this has more to do with demeaning women than anything pertaining to men's rights. A. you've provided no source for this graph's statistics B.if you were really trying t…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:22 PM
-4

how about letting women take the blame for what they wear and not try to blame it on "men over-sexualizing women,"
/r/MensRights11/05/13 01:12 AM
30

the onion is supposed to be satire. this is just sarcastic nastiness. Where's the joke?
/r/MensRights08/05/13 11:02 PM
2

"When it comes to ego suppression, women are just better at it than men." the funny part being that the woman who found Bin Laden had a gigantic ego about it.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 10:10 PM
35

ookay let's sift through the bullshit here. right wingers are exploiting this situation to drum up paranoia about feminists not all MRAs are conservatives. I'm a liberal, I just don't buy into feminism. The incidents where known liberals actually do something wrong are so few and far between that conservatives tend to get a little overexcited when something real actually happens oh wow. Obama's a liberal and he's trying to give weapons to Syrian rebels that are allied with Al-Qaeda. I guess libe…
/r/MensRights02/05/13 10:04 PM
0

read: "I can't actually come up with an argument so I'm just giving up."
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:20 PM
0

"by extension" Read: using common fucking sense. If someone says it can't even frighten little kids then they're saying that it's not fucking frightening. Please tell me you're just pretending to be this retarded.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 01:41 PM
0

well yeah. She says that the logo isn't even capable of frightening small children, so by extension, she's saying the logo itself isn't very frightening at all. Jesus Christ are you really this dense?
/r/MensRights28/04/13 09:57 PM
0

or maybe you do because the letter is merely criticizing that the administration is prioritizing consumerism through the redesign, rather than face fixing issues with the team members themselves. "Well President Herbst, the new Husky logo may not be capable of frightening small children, but the face of real life UConn athletics is certainly capable of frightening college women. she explicitly states here that the logo isn't frightening or intimidating at all but that the "face of real life UCon…
/r/MensRights28/04/13 08:20 PM
-5

she's talking about the athletes themselves, not the logo dipshit. learn to read. The Daily Caller article was just making shit up.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 04:59 PM
1

"that the redesigned team logo will intimidate women and empower rape culture." how about you stop parroting everything the daily caller tells you? If you'd actually read the letter you linked to you'd see that the daily caller was purely making shit up.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 12:06 AM
2

"it's a fallacy used by MRAs to rebut feminist arguments" that's worded really bad. I think you mean "It's a fallacy used by feminists which MRAs often call them out for"
/r/MensRights27/04/13 12:01 AM
1

except you're the one whose telling me that i'm making up definitions, WHEN THEY'RE IN THE FUCKING DICTIONARY. And when I show you that they're in the dictionary, you still call me stupid.I don't consider someone who thinks money is a service as "a few floors above my basement" you arrogant prick.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 04:19 PM
0

usually as in, in regards to economics. In economics. money is currency. Services and goods are the things that you purchase with currency. This isn't a difficult concept to grasp.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 06:02 AM
1

"definition you just made the fuck up." holy shit it's not hard to find from merriam-webster dictionary. Good: n.:something that has economic utility or satisfies an economic want Goods n. :personal property having intrinsic value but usually excluding money, securities, and negotiable instruments it specifically fucking excludes money, so yeah. Service n.: useful labor that does not produce a tangible commodity —usually used in plural <charge for professional services> money cannot do labor. th…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 01:05 AM
2

"implements" what?
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:43 AM
0

"money is both a good and a service" what? no. it's neither. In order for something to be a good it has to have utility outside of being able to purchase things. A service is something done by a person so inherently money can't be a service either. holy fuck, you act all arrogant and you don't even know what goods or services are? wow.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:43 AM
1

yes, you do. because the money is being exchanged for goods or services. No matter what you do with your money, you are not denying anybody equal access to goods or services. Money is not a good, nor a service, it's currency.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:18 AM
1

what? people are trading their money for your goods and/or services. If you provide goods or services you can't then say "this section of the population can't have access to my goods/services."
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:12 AM
1

if they're selling it. They can't then pick and choose who can and can't purchase their goods or use their services. They have to make it available to everyone, or no one.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:01 AM
7

"95 percent of serious domestic violence is committed by men" holy fucking wow. How does one statistically qualify "serious?" it's known that men cause more damage in domestic violence due to them being naturally stronger physically, but women and men commit it at pretty much the same rate.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:54 PM
1

when they infringe on the right of others to have equal access to goods and services.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:51 PM
1

" Who cares if they don't like black people or gays or white cis-gendered single fathers" the people they deny services to. " If they don't want to do business with a certain group of people then they won't get that groups money." and then they'll still keep denying equal access to services to every other person they feel like discriminating against. "You shouldn't legislate people from being rude. " there's a difference between being rude and being discriminatory in a business setting.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:20 PM
1

and that's going to somehow stop them from doing it more? it sure didn't seem to stop them during the segregation era.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 07:41 AM
1

if they're denying service to people based on their orientation, sex, religion, or race it WOULD be hurting them. People have a right to not be denied equal access to services just because the person providing them is prejudiced.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 12:40 AM
5

"Rather than feminist subs and masculinist subs clashing, can't we all strive toward a common goal?" We would gladly, but they won't let us.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:43 PM
2

yeah get the fuck out of here . due to poe's law it's hard to tell if this is a joke or if you're actually that dumb but A. it's a fucking children's show about ponies, it's not intelligent in the least B. you're bigoted as fuck C. the show was created by a woman unlike what you claim whether it's a joke or not. Leave, don't come back. We don't need nor want this shit here.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:41 PM
1

I hardly ever go to chick-fil-a. They're in business because people like eating chicken.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:32 PM
2

"Why would gay people want to eat at Chik-Fil-A after that bullshit Chik-Fil-A spewed about a year ago?" Oh i dunno, maybe because they like the taste of it? " You take that away and any business with a sense of money is going to accept white people, black people, and gay people's money. If they don't, then they're out some money, they'll probably go out of business. " there are plenty of places that have denied services to people for being gay and are still in business.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 04:33 PM
4

the point is, businesses should not be able to deny somebody access to goods or services based off of their sex, race, sexual orientation, or religion. Would it be fair if no gay people were allowed to eat at chick-fil-a because chick-fil-a hates gays? Then again, a christian hospital denying treatment to a gay person could actually happen. just fucking look at how blacks had it in the U.S. in the earlier half of the 20th century. that's why these laws were put in place, so that restaurants, hot…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:21 AM
5

and? people are crazy. when thinking about policies you should examine all possibilities it could entail. What if a gay person is travelling along the road late and needs to find a hotel so he doesn't fall asleep at the wheel, but the only hotel for miles doesn't accept gay people.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 03:34 AM
17

I don't. what if someone gets injured and the nearest hospital happens to be a private hospital, so they take that person to the private hospital and they say "sorry we don't treat black people" and the person dies before they can get to another one?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 02:06 AM
32

This is segregation at its most blatant. I can just imagine it 10 years from now. "sorry sir you can't use this women-only water fountain, women need safe water fountains where they don't have to have men standing behind them in line because the man may stare at her ass" "I'm sorry sir this is a women-only hotel, women need a safe space from men so you're gonna have to find another hotel" "I'm sorry sir this is a women-only train car. A woman might fall asleep on the train ride and feel uncomfor…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 02:05 AM
4

oh the old "MRAs are just males who are upset that women have rights now" argument. fucking please.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 01:54 AM
28

"The fact that there is a Violence Against Women Act in the US is an example of how misandry exists because it assumes there is no violence against men, despite the fact that the act uses gender neutral language." it's called the "violence against women act" and establishes an "office on violence against women" how is that gender neutral language? ". Yet they don’t mention that suicide attempts by women are three to four times higher and are often linked to sexual abuse." so when people only bri…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 05:36 PM
1

"How often are men eyeball-fucked, stared down, and cat-called in public in comparison to women?" plenty, provided you're attractive. "How many times have you, as a man, felt threatened or uncomfortable being in a room surrounded by women?" never because I'm not some paranoid schizo who judges people on the basis of their sex alone. " How many times do you leave the house wondering if today's the day you're going to get raped?" anybody who leaves their house wondering that is purely paranoid. an…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 12:12 AM
2

I remember I got in trouble in school for drawing a lightsaber once.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 04:29 PM
3

Can you cite which part of American Health care law allows for free heart screenings for women only? I'm curious, not doubting you or anything, I just couldn't seem to find it. There's lots of stuff in Obamacare like this. For instance if you're a man, you have to be at a high risk of HIV to get screened but women only have to be "sexually active." Domestic violence counseling is only covered for women. All sexually active women get free cervical cancer screenings but there is no such thing for …
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:57 PM
-1

natural selection. A long time ago, the determining factor for a healthy society was how many women they had. More women = more babies. men were disposable compared to women. if all but one man in the village were to die off, that one man could still impregnate all the women. To compound that men were also naturally stronger than women. Thus, it's the man who did all the manual labor and bringing in the money. Men were normally the workers and women were normally the ones who took care of the ho…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:22 PM
3

The kicker is that she was charged with everything but sexual assault.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:47 PM
-2

"Germany boy" I fucking lost it.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:45 PM
1

"But why is it always women who receive the cautionary advice?" because our society has a way of normally painting women as the victims and men as the victimizers. many don't give the advice to a male believe that he's strong enough to take care of himself. "8% sexual assaults reported to the police were men, and that men are just as likely to report it to the police." there's a plethora of studies out there that say otherwise. In society if men are sexually assaulted it's often that they will p…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:13 PM
1

Keep in mind that that's just the number of sexual offences reported. According to statistics cited by that article in 30 percent of sexual offence trials the defendant was declared not guilty. Also in 42 percent of rape trials the defendant was declared not guilty. This shows that the number of actual offences differs greatly from the number of reported offences. Also keep in mind that statistically men undereport sexual offences to a much larger extent than women.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 03:14 PM
1

under section 1 of the Sexual Offences act of 2003. the defendant, A, is guilty of rape if: A intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of B (the complainant) with his penis; B does not consent to the penetration; and, A does not reasonably believe that B consents. so in essence, in UK law, women can't commit rape, only men can.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:25 AM
3

"Feminism is always going to exist, because there are women's rights issues. The same exact thing goes for the MRM. If we just continue to bicker about who has more problems like 9 year olds, instead of accepting that both groups have legitimate, yet separate causes, then both groups are hindered. " we recognize that. We'd have zero problem with feminists if they tried merely to advance understanding of women's issues. Unfortunately it goes much further than that, advocating policies that would …
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:21 AM
6

even if a "patriarchy" exists then how exactly would one go about fighting it? It's not like a bunch of cisgendered straight white men sit down at a table coming up with new ways to oppress women. Saying "we're protesting the patriarchy" does nothing as their view of patriarchy is just a nebulous conglomeration of societal attitudes toward women. instead, why don't you attack the issues that you think this "patriarchy" affects head-on? you can blame it on the patriarchy and say "we fight the pat…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:26 AM
3

Protip: don't major in game design. Unless you specialize in something like art design, coding, or modeling, you'll get next to nowhere in the games industry.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 09:50 PM
2

This reminds me of when that one white conservative guy got a bunch of flack for saying Obama was "very well-spoken" because it was construed as racist.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:23 AM
1

There's nothing wrong with this. She just feels the female character shouldn't wear super-sexified clothing. I often tend to enjoy female characters in better when they're not trying to look super-sexy and waring revealing shit. That's a perfectly valid complaint. Go to /v/ if you're gonna whine and complain about this shit.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:48 PM
13

"Another editor slapped a guy when "he told me he thought he had breast cancer." (Okay that one makde us laugh really hard.)" that's fucking disgusting. Fucking heartless Jezebel cunts.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:30 PM
13

we have a "take back the night" thingy at my college campus too. I love how on the posters they list that "1 in 6 women will be the victims of sexual assault" without even regarding that the exact same thing is true for men. And then those feminists have the gall to say to our faces that THEY are working for men's rights and we should just join them.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 05:26 AM
3

that's terrible. Then there's also the fact that masturbation is irrelevant as a sperm is not an organism nor does it constitute a human life until it penetrates an ovum. I'm pro-choice as long as it's within the first trimester or a health risk to the mother but I completely understand the pro-life position and respect it.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:24 AM
6

"placing the blame on women is misdirected" of course it is and that's not what we're doing. We're blaming an overzealous promotion of neo-feminist philosophies. There are female MRAs as well. I hate it when people conflate "anti-feminist" with "anti-woman"
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:13 AM
3

ah the classic "you just don't see it because you're not a woman" argument. I don't know how many times I've heard this argument. "why? I don't know why! because we live in a patriarchy!" if she doesn't know why then how does she know that patriarchy is to blame? why not just, y'know, ASK her boss? "you have right's more rights then I will ever have" yep according to feminists either A. there are no inequalities that discriminate against men or B. all the inequalities men face are due to the "pa…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:14 PM
1

they don't. they protest at a legally safe distance and stay within their rights to protest. These feminists are not. Imagine if the WBC blocked the entrance to the graveyard so the family couldn't get through, yelled "FIRE" to get everybody to leave, and stated making as much noise as possible in order to prevent family members from hearing the eulogy. that's how these feminists are acting.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:41 PM
2

They're worse. At least WBC isn't DISRUPTING funerals, they just peacefully protest outside of them. Even the WBC recognizes that your right to swing your fist ends at another's nose. This video makes it abundantly clear that these people have zero respect for freedom of speech. Just take a look at the shit they spout in this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZvUA6hUVok "I firmly believe that freedom of speech ends where hate speech begins" that's awfully convenient when they label any disse…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:55 PM
20

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZvUA6hUVok skip to 5:10 Feminist man: "I firmly believe that freedom of speech ends where hate speech begins. And it is right there next door to us." Guy in crowd: "My rights don't end where your feelings begin." Feminist woman: "Fuck you" This is absolutely disgusting. They try to claim the moral high ground whilst lying about what MRAs are about and abridging freedom of speech. It's awfully convenient when you can label any dissenting opinions "hate speech" and …
/r/MensRights05/04/13 04:54 AM
5

she claims that they want to address the issues that MRA's tackle but actions speak way louder than words. On my college campus i found a poster for an event called "take back the night" which uses as a primary point how 1 in 6 women have been sexually assaulted, completely disregarding that the same is true for men. There's no mention of the fact that men can be sexual assault victims anywhere on the advertisement. Guess who it was sponsored and organized by? My University's Feminist Collective…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 04:21 AM
13

I love how one of the says "feminists don't want men to lose custody. We're fighting that too because we're fighting the PATRIARCHY." saying "we're fighting it by fighting the patriarchy" is such a hilariously delusional way into thinking you're actually doing something. Patriarchy doesn't exist, so fighting it really won't help jack shit. Instead of blaming all of the problems on the big bad "patriarchy" and fighting THAT, why don't you just try tackling the issues DIRECTLY rather than INDIRECT…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 04:17 AM
12

Dick Masterson is pretty much a comedian that tricks people into thinking he's being serious. I mean just look at his name for fuck's sake. He's like a Sacha Baron Cohen character except nobody really knows his actual identity or name.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:12 PM
4

"changes the law to abolish legal protections for defendants" but that's not really what happened. It just removes the time limit for getting someone convicted for a rape case.. for instance if someone is raped and they don't know who did it, but find through DNA evidence years later who it was, then they can convict that person. I doubt it will really lead to any more false rape accusations than we have already, keep in mind it can also be used by sons or daughters to report that they were rape…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 03:13 AM
1

It's a scientist's hypothesis, even if it's most likely a false one. It's not promoting hatred against men nor it is trying to portray men as inherently inferior to women. Please stop trying to construe this as misandry. If we start calling every slightest little thing "misandry" we're gonna end up being no better than the Feminists.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:57 AM
-3

This isn't sexism. It's a scientists opinion on genetics. Even if it's wrong. She's not try to claim that having a Y chromosome makes an person inherently worse or anything.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:52 AM
1

nope. I'm a fairly liberal leaning person when it comes to most issues. Yet i'm an MRA
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:47 AM
2

Seriously man, you need to get out of there before you get killed. get her put away.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:49 AM
2

"What are goals of this movement? Broadly and specifically (in terms of legislation, etc etc)?" to make men and women have an equal playing field. We really just want equality between both sexes. We recognize that there are inequalities that women face, but we also seem to be the only ones fighting to fix the inequalities that men face. "How have you heard patriarchy defined?" typically I've heard it defined as a society in which men are central, and entails male superiority and female subordina…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:19 PM
0

he doesn't get beaten up by the whole crew. Only maybe 1 or 2 people actually hit him, the rest were trying to break up the fight. The only ones I saw who actually hit him was the male host in the vest and the one dude in the pink shirt
/r/MensRights29/03/13 01:13 AM
1

Abercrombie shopping bags, just look at those fucking things Boy Bands/ Justin Bieber (they only like them because they're good-looking) Twilight Magic Mike 5.Chippendales 6.Chicks grabbing men's asses There's tons of examples.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:15 PM
2

This has nothing to do with men's rights. It's a jesus-freak shouting in tongues and "feeling the holy spirit."
/r/MensRights26/03/13 08:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter