TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

superstubb Archive

View 15 posts and 271 comments by superstubb on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1249

superstubb/r/MensRights15/09/13 02:32 PM
169

superstubb/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:32 PM
71

superstubb/r/MensRights02/02/13 02:27 AM
62

superstubb/r/MensRights10/05/13 03:02 PM
52

superstubb/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:13 AM
37

superstubb/r/MensRights30/12/13 02:35 PM
24

superstubb/r/MensRights01/02/13 06:43 PM
23

superstubb/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:52 PM
20

superstubb/r/MensRights20/02/13 06:44 PM
10

superstubb/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:51 PM
7

superstubb/r/MensRights01/02/13 03:52 AM
5

superstubb/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:51 PM
2

superstubb/r/MensRights05/03/13 02:57 PM
2

superstubb/r/MensRights12/01/14 06:11 PM
0

superstubb/r/MensRights20/09/13 12:46 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think it's damn near impossible to think of a right men have over women. This topic will ultimately be about responsibilities men have women that woman don't. Some of which are mandated by law.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 06:27 AM
1

That is fucking hilarious.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 09:34 PM
-1

He's putting way too much importance on his Facebook post. Because you'd have to pretend he's that powerful to cause that kind of reaction and there is no other possible explanation. That's pretty fucking arrogant.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 11:58 PM
1

So you're saying correlation equals causation?
/r/MensRights12/03/16 04:37 PM
3

Because of double-standards. Reverse this image with something that looks like melons or a ham sandwich and say the exact same words and now you're a mysoginistic pig and what business is it of yours what I do with my body and why are we sluts if we like sex and it's my choice and ajwdfkndsckjkdmcslkc...
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:55 PM
1

Do the same macro with a cantaloupe (or if she's old, 2 loaves of French bread) and type the same thing. Let's see what happens.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:52 PM
1

How is the non-working partner suppose to acquire the skills to make a living without training time. I also married a twelve year-old. Seriously, that point is stupid. If you were dumb enough to marry a person with zero skills in anything in life, then maybe you should pay for her dumb ass.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 09:02 PM
2

She is not funny. I don't understand the appeal. Maybe you should expand your horizons.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:43 PM
1

Maybe the poster just believes in free thought.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 01:05 PM
32

I don't disagree with you. Personally, I'd try to help anyone, man or woman, if needed. But I don't think it's my obligation because of some gender role.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 03:40 PM
115

The author is blaming the "weakness" on rabid feminism. And I agree with him. If women think equality is stripping men of their masculinity, this is the result when men from other cultures, cultures who not only don't see women as equals, but in some cases, property, get thrown into the mix. Yeah, what's happening now isn't very surprising.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 02:08 PM
1

Where did I say that? Of course the word "bitch" was known and used, but it went from being a word used primarily as an insult and used in certain contexts to becoming an everyday throw away word with common adoption with the popularity of hip hop. It became so over used and commonplace, nowadays most people don't bat an eye when it's said. It's almost lost its meaning. Same with words like "amazing", "awesome", "epic", etc.. You can even say the word "fuck" has lost a lot of its punch due to it…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 02:45 PM
1

NWA made gratuitous use of "bitch" in their songs and they got started in the mid to late 80's. Same with 2 Live Crew, Getto Boys, and other groups. And it's common knowledge that these groups became widely popular with the middle class, largely white suburbanite kids. "Smack My Bitch Up" was released in the late 90s, long after kids adopted the term in everyday conversation. By then, the word almost became generic. That's how language works. Source: I'm 41 and was one of those white middle clas…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:37 PM
2

Feminism is at the root of these kinds of injustices. Or do you think that having a female judge rule in this manner is just a coincidence? Or that anything like this would happen to a woman in the same situation?
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:11 PM
2

This much is true. At some point we forget people get old. Probably because of Hollywood. Movies made in one decade and stars who were famous in that role stick in our minds as that's who they are. Forever. It's not fair, but it's true. Women are held more to that standard than men I think, but take a look at Harrison Ford in the first Indian Jones movie and the last one. And that's even with him aging well. Hell, look at Marion Brando in the 50s and look at him on the 70s in the Godfather. Holy…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:20 PM
3

I'm not saying a women can't get bolt-ons if that's what she wants. More power to her. I'm saying its a little sad to watch the women in my life feel the need to upgrade. None of their husbands see the point. Not one. They'll admit they look nice, but none of them asked for it, and they are really bewildered why they think they need to go bigger. I really think women compete with each other and this is one way some do it. But then men and society get blamed for unreasonable expectations. That's …
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:48 PM
4

A religion created by desert nomads a half a world away three thousand years ago. It's actually scary if you really think about it.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:39 PM
1

It's nice to see "the other side" can come here and post something that isn't trolling and actually contributes. I like you. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:38 PM
4

I'll bite. I am circumcised, as was my father. I'm guessing that's why it was done. My brother too. As a little kid, I remember thinking my penis was normal, and was really weirded out by my friend's uncircumcised penis (it was a camp, group shower thing). But all I knew was mine and my brother's schlongs were "normal" as they were, so of course foreskin was weird to me. Anyway... I now have my own boys. Both of which I had circumcised. The only real reason was because I wanted them to look like…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:33 PM
6

TIL websites like this exist. Jesus fucking Christ. As others have mentioned, you need a lawyer. Stat. Don't let this haunt you for the rest of your life. Regardless of cost. But I think a simple call to the site may be enough to get it removed. And if you have to hint at a lawsuit, they will probably concede.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:21 PM
13

As an atheist, I concur. I'm not militant at all. I Just don't believe in an invisible sky wizard. But that place is full of assholes. I think it's mostly high school kids who think it's cool to buck the system. As a side note, if anyone here is agnostic or an atheist, r/trueatheism has a much more mature and reasonable community. If anyone is interested.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 06:59 PM
3

I read this twice and I still don't know what you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 06:56 PM
4

Lawyer up. No one here is qualified to answer you, especially not knowing all the pertinent facts and laws in Virginia.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:59 PM
0

Thanks for making us all look bad, OP.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:25 PM
5

Nonsense. Let's take away the money from people who work and give it to those who don't. That fixes everything.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 12:45 PM
1

That logic could be expanded to not allowing women in the military at all.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 08:44 PM
4

Except in this case, yeah, it kinda is. It's a double entendre here because D is usually short for "Defense", but it also has a popular use: http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/the-d That's the joke.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 03:00 AM
2

By taking the law into your own hands? I agree.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 09:41 PM
2

I went through something similar years ago. My ex-wife decided to move to West Virginia (I lived in Maryland at the time) when my son was 3. It was about a 4 hour round trip to go get him on a Friday and another 4 hours to take him back on a Sunday. Obviously, this arrangement wasn't practical for a variety of reasons. But legally, there wasn't anything I could do, not to mention I was pretty much broke after the child support and "normal" expenses, so fighting her in court just wasn't feasible.…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 06:41 PM
4

Yeah. Take the law into your own hands. What could possibly go wrong?
/r/MensRights12/01/14 06:36 PM
-3

Or, you know, stop being upset over stupid shit. Who cares what this guy thinks? Ignore him and move on. Christ, you sound like my kids. "DAAAAAD... Matthew keeps saying mean things to meeeeee...!" Grow up.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:40 PM
-12

Yes, being a tattle-tale is a great idea.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:16 PM
1

I fail to see how this is a men's rights issue. Why shouldn't penis size matter to women? What's wrong with a chick liking a big fatty? I prefer women with big tits. So what?
/r/MensRights03/01/14 06:48 PM
1

Obligatory
/r/MensRights02/01/14 12:03 PM
1

It's not a real word. Stop trying to make it one. You look dumb using it.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 10:56 AM
2

It must be exhausting being you.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 03:15 AM
1

I'm referring to your hating of everyone.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 01:43 AM
1

You must be a blast at parties.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 01:25 AM
0

Downvote for saying "welp".
/r/MensRights02/01/14 01:25 AM
8

Fuck this guy. You don't kill your fucking children, no matter how tight the squeeze your ex-wife has on you.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 03:09 PM
2

It was done to show how flawed the thing is. I think the point was made.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 04:45 PM
4

This is the first I've heard of this, so I'm not apologizing for anything. But I would like to say "Sucks, doesn't it?" Now you know how it feels. Instead of pointing fingers at people who had nothing to do with this, maybe you should re-evaluate the position and see false rape claims as something that should be addressed with women, since that's where the majority of these claims are coming from.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 03:08 PM
-2

I LOL'd.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:25 PM
3

You need to get your facts straight. First of all, the guy did not take the baby to a fire station. In fact, there was a fire station half a mile from the gas station he claims to have found the baby, but he didn't go there. Instead, he flagged someone down looking for "help" which eventually lead to the police getting involved. So that right there kills any argument about that. Second, the baby still had its umbilical chord attached, which would raise a red flag for anyone, seeing as how that's…
/r/MensRights16/12/13 04:58 PM
3

Not only did he lie about who he was, it wasn't even his child. This isn't a case of double-standards. How do you not see this as the real problem?
/r/MensRights16/12/13 04:33 PM
3

Your title is deceptively ambiguous. Try actually reading the article for the details to see what the real crime was, dipshit.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 04:16 PM
1

Making toys and other products pink is pretty standard practice if you want to target girls. Why? Because girls tend to be attracted to pink things, for a variety of reasons. They use test groups with actual girls to see how they respond to the products they want to sell. They'll have several versions of the toy and see what the kids are mostly attracted to. If the majority of girls gravitate to the pink version, guess which one is getting made? The only color these people care about is green, a…
/r/MensRights09/12/13 08:56 PM
-12

To be fair, I don't either.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:23 PM
1

I prefer chloroform.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 04:31 PM
1

Stop looking for things to get offended at.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 04:31 PM
2

This sub is turning into a mirror of the feminist propaganda machine. Everything is offensive, so let's all wear our feelings on our sleeves and bitch about it.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 04:27 PM
1

Equal rights means as long as we can continue to make jokes about the stereotypical ineptitude of women in various circumstances (and let's face it, some of it is true) I have no problem with these kinds of jokes.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 04:25 PM
7

Yeah, because most women have the time and opportunity to whip out their cell phone, call their ex, and set it to speakerphone all while getting held down and forcefully violated. The idiot should do time for the murder, and the bitch should do equal time for setting the whole thing up.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 04:17 PM
1

Yeah, a lot of that is privilege for being a woman, something feminists seem to think they don't have.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 06:06 PM
2

You do realize there are tons of similar ads from years gone by showing men spanking women, and other "abuses", right?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 02:57 PM
5

This post sucks and so does the OP.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:18 PM
1

Because it takes the focus off of them.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 01:13 PM
1

What a pig.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 11:45 AM
18

Often times a "reversal" is funny, particularly is that switcharoo isn't often thought of, or dismissed. It can sometimes be funny when it's unexpected, and after the initial laugh it makes you think. Or at least it should. Getting offended by this is silly. It's mildly amusing.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 02:34 PM
2

How did an article on the science of aggression in women turn into a lecture on how men need self control?
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:07 PM
1

Explosions tend to be violent. That's generally the first thought that comes to most peoples minds. Perhaps you should choose your words better in the future. And since we're going to stick with using stereotypes, I'll take your example of airing all the dirty little secrets around the workplace and label that "gossip". And it's generally regarded that women are the gossipy type, more so than men. At least, that's the stereotype. So how about you just stop doing mental gymnastics with your argum…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 02:41 PM
1

Of course they do. But "differently" doesn't mean men all mean react violently and all women are more subtle. Or less frequent. You're just feeding into stereotypes.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 01:58 PM
2

I've seen plenty of women lose their shit at work over the last 20+ years I've been in the workplace. You're painting with a very broad brush here.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 01:33 PM
-1

Says the guy who's never been around women.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 01:06 PM
2

Estrogen-heavy, then.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:58 PM
4

Meh. It's not really a men's rights issue. I couldn't care less if they want a "girls only" club on the internet. Good for them. However, it will likely expose many of these ladies as being the thing they resent the most, sexist hypocrites.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:46 PM
0

The over-the top-response from the guy is what creates the humor. If he had said "Be a weak woman and do the dishes" it wouldn't have had the same effect nor be very funny. The joke would fall flat. Not to mention C&H is known for this brand of humor. You miss the whole point in using shock value. Not only do you miss the point, you just sound like a whiny asshole dissecting it the way you are. It proves you have no sense of humor. You sound like the flip side of a typical feminist. Quit crying …
/r/MensRights22/09/13 11:14 AM
-1

Me two.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 08:25 PM
0

I have ten words on how necessary your post is.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 07:00 PM
0

TL;DR: I'm uptight and lack any sense of humor.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 06:59 PM
1

A hipster whining about being made fun of because he does hipster things? Oh come on.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:39 PM
1

White womyn problems.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:13 PM
1

Fuck. Right in the gut.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 01:32 PM
5

This literally makes me feel sick inside. How could anyone possibly hate their husband so much she would kill her own children just to spite him?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:45 PM
1

Hmmmmm... My favorite hangout is a sports bar not far from me. It's predominately male, for obvious reasons. Anyone who visited there, especially during a high profile sports event where the male percentage is particularly high, would never confuse the place for a gay bar. Or that most of the patrons were latent homosexuals.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 04:50 PM
1

What a pig.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:16 PM
1

Child support laws and calculations vary by state, so it's best you speak to a lawyer. But typically they look at both parents' incomes, expenditures for things like health care, daycare, etc. and overnight stays between the households, and then use a predetermined formula for what the paying parent owes. In my case, it wasn't a matter of negotiating about the daycare expense. It was included in the calculations. If your financial situation changes, or your child no longer requires daycare, you …
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:36 PM
3

It was much higher when he was in daycare. My pay fluctuates because I'm a freelance artist. But typically, no, I don't make 45k. Closer to 30-35k on average.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:20 PM
2

He's on my family health insurance plan. He no longer is in daycare, he's in high school.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:14 PM
3

I pay $450 for one child.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:01 PM
2

Thank you for the stats. The easiest solution would be to increases the playing time for women. That may not balance all of the money involved, but at least it starts level. The fact is, it's typically men that watch sports more than women. And men typically prefer watching the male version of the sport. The NBA/WNBA is a prime example of this. Women/men's golf too perhaps. Sponsors pay for what they think will have the largest audience. Tennis may be more of an anomaly in women's sports, but in…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 12:55 AM
6

According the the article, the police didn't even get involved until 8 years later. And that was because the family didn't go to them until then. Had they done so, this may not have dragged on as long as it did. I see your point OP, but it's a bit misleading to ignore that.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 02:44 PM
8

That may certainly be true to an extent, but his point still stands. Woman are "working" less and likely drawing less viewers, i.e., less money, yet being paid "equally".
/r/MensRights06/07/13 02:37 PM
1

98% of men are male? That's incredible.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:21 PM
1

I'm 40. Been married twice. Co-habituated a couple of times. Do you want specifics, or were you being smarmy because I'm on the receiving end of a lot of downvotes? The old joke about sex stopping after she eats the wedding cake is there for a reason. I don't know what the parameters were for the survey. I bet if you ask newlyweds you'll get a different answer than most married couple 5 or 10 years in. Hell, if we take these findings to their logical extent, my grandparents should be fucking lik…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:17 AM
-6

Because data has never been manipulated to make a point.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 12:30 PM
-13

Married men have more sex than single men, on average - but much less than men who are cohabiting with their partners outside of marriage, especially as time goes on. I'll be married for 11 years in August. And this claim couldn't be further from the truth.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 11:58 AM
0

Just based on her article, it sounds like she got trolled by a bunch of lonely morons with nothing better to do than be bitter. But without actually reading her profile it's really hard to get a real sense of context or to comment. Other than she looks cute in that picture.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 08:50 PM
8

Why not? As a white guy, I get blamed for shit my ancestors did 300 years ago.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 08:40 PM
2

That's exactly what it is. Shameless.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 08:37 PM
2

Then why are all the best chefs male?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:23 PM
1

Common courtesy shouldn't apply to a specific gender. And I don't need a long drawn out post to remind me to be polite to strangers.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 02:51 PM
0

Give the baby up so I can pay him child support? Oh, that's rich. And my wife comes from a fairly religious background. Abortion would likely not be an option for her. And knowing her, I doubt she would be able to bring herself to "abandon" her baby with adoption, even if it was the product of rape. If you're so blinded by other things as to ignore other concerns just because they don't fit your little agenda, well, I guess there isn't much else to say.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 08:05 PM
0

Then the real problem here is what constitutes "rape". The simple definition of a rape should be someone who is either unable or unwilling to give consent and is forced into sex. A girl who has a few beers at a party and decides to sleep with her ex-boyfriend on a late night booty call and wakes up the next day with a twinge of regret shouldn't get to pull the rape card. The laws need to recognize that. Regret sex is not rape sex. I know I'm preaching to the choir on that, but that said, I don't…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:02 PM
0

Well, that's your problem. You're equating a drunken one night stand with a person who forcefully, without consent, raped another person. There's a big difference. Just because 2 people made some bad choices because they were drunk and now one of them has a little regret is not the same thing as drugging or physically forcing the other to have sex with them. So you can think about that and then reconsider my point.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:49 PM
0

I'm wrong for thinking rapists shouldn't have access to the children they sired during rape? Well fuck you too.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:40 PM
0

And your point?
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:23 PM
2

Fuck rapists. Of all genders. You lose certain "rights" when you take advantage of or force yourself onto someone, and should be in jail.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:03 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:10 PM
3

What a pig.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:03 PM
4

What the actual fuck?!? This has to be a really late April Fools joke. Right? If not, I hope the school tells this twunt to fuck off.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 11:37 PM
6

You don't fuck with taxes.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 11:33 PM
-6

This post was dumb.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:48 AM
-10

I think this proves the point.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 06:01 PM
2

Yes, you are being overly sensitive.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:37 PM
1

We'll agree to disagree, and again, thank you for debating me without dismissing what I had to say just because your blood clots are stinkier than my dongle is large. ; ) Cheers.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 02:32 AM
2

Bullshit. Neither of those guys sat directly behind her. Look at the photo again. He's down a few seats. Regardless, my point remains no one was trying to intimidate her. She had to choose to let it annoy her. Is that what a strong, empowered woman would do? Oh wait, in her blog she said women need to be coddled from the cradle to the grave. Great role model you ladies have there. Also, I didn't mean to imply that room was 20% women. The conference was. I don't know if that meant several rooms a…
/r/MensRights24/03/13 01:24 AM
3

OK well, I didn't think my example had to be so specific to the situation. You mentioned the workplace, I used a workplace setting. Regardless, if you sat behind me at a conference and made a joke about some dude's dick being so small even a priest wouldn't touch it, I'd still laugh and carry on with my own business. You won't lose your job or have our face plastered all over the internet because I can't brush off some juvenile humor. You know, like the same kind of cock jokes she made regarding…
/r/MensRights24/03/13 12:37 AM
3

All I'm saying is this: If i worked in an office comprised mostly of women, and if I walked by you and another woman having a private conversation in the break room, and I overhear you tell her "Damn, my flow was so heavy this month it looked like a can of chipotles in adobo sauce", I wouldn't get offended. I wouldn't run to the boss. I wouldn't put your picture on Twitter in an effort to publicly shame you. I wouldn't white knight myself in a lengthy blog article about it. I'd laugh my fucking …
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:32 PM
0

Yeah. I'm threatened by an Internet tough guy. Let me go cower somewhere. YAWN
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:15 PM
1

High school. Because that's what your points sound like. Seriously, you sound like a damn teenager who knows everything. You can drag out some accusation of ageism or some other nonsense, but it's been my observation that with age comes experience, and with experience hopefully a bit of wisdom. You're overall attitude on this topic strongly implies you have neither the experience nor the wisdom to draw from, or showing a bit of restraint and some common sense. I've always had a way of letting my…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 08:25 PM
0

What grade are you in?
/r/MensRights23/03/13 08:08 PM
0

Wow. Someone thinks highly of themselves today...
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:44 PM
5

Sure you can. I'd have no problem with that. I'd even chime in and make some irreverent joke about seepage or crust or that smell you guys get. You know what I'm talking about. It's all cool with me.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:29 PM
0

She's lying about it? The guy who got fired admitted he made the dick joke about big dongles and apologized. She has a crude sense of humor? No, if anything she's a damn prude with no sense of humor at all. WTF are you even talking about? This conversation doesn't even make sense. I can't be bothered.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:22 PM
1

No, she didn't. She never even claimed that. I never said she outright claimed that. I said it's clear she believed it, based on her reaction and based on what she said following the incident. It's not always about what someone says, it's about what they do. Her justification for the whole affair, and saying things like "Women in technology need consistent messaging from birth through retirement they are welcome, competent and valued in the industry." lead me to believe she very much considers h…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:18 PM
1

Nor that ^
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:03 PM
0

Well, Barny Badass, get reprimanded once or twice for using words like "niggardly" (happened to me once many years ago at work) and you'll realize your crusade isn't always expedient. You may lose your job or get punched in the face, but hey, you showed them!
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:03 PM
1

I see these signs quite often, and have for a long time (Baltimore).
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:38 PM
5

I'm guessing you missed his point. Ms. Richards believed she was the victim of male-on-female sexism, and acted with self righteous indignation. In reality, she was to perpetrator of sexism on females, by lumping the girl in the slide (and herself, presumably) with the stereotype of "women are chaste, cloistered founts of virginal purity whose honor and virtuous, wide-eyed, Bambi-like innocence need to be constantly guarded. Spiritual, vulnerable, untainted women would only be corrupted in such …
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:24 PM
0

No one here is arguing that the word "niggardly" in and of itself is racist or is related to the word "nigger". But you'd be a fool to not understand that those ignorant, uneducated people who think it is can't make trouble for you. Like these incidents. Like it or not, the uneducated morons can affect you, your job, or your reputation just by them being morons. I'll assume you're young and haven't figured out yet some battles are best just left alone.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:09 PM
0

This.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:01 PM
4

I was raised by a very liberal, single mom... Well, if you're going to be be honest with yourself, will you agree that right there is a heavy bias that may have warped your view of men?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:10 PM
2

No, the circumstances are completely different, but i can see now that escapes you. Or you're just being argumentative for the hell of it. Either way, not wasting my time.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 09:44 PM
2

Do you also understand that you can't compare the two situations, which makes your initial assertion void?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 07:30 PM
2

Yeah. Your assertion is that having her fired is the equivalent of her getting him fired. The problem with that is that getting her fired is NOT the equivalent. The circumstances for both are completely different. She made a big spectacle of overhearing a private conversation between 2 guys. All because she felt the need to be the Joan of Arc for the tech industry. And now this guy is unemployed. This is not the same scenario for her. She wanted to make a big deal. She wanted some attention. She…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 07:23 PM
2

And what was yours?
/r/MensRights21/03/13 07:02 PM
2

I disagree. There is a difference in being a bitch and getting someone fired for nothing, and in turn having said bitch fired as retribution. Justice. Maybe it will discourage people from bitchy and overly sensitive.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:43 PM
5

Those 2 events are a direct result of her actions and faux outrage.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 06:35 PM
-2

If you choose to be known for a dual or a hyphenated name, you obviously want to draw some sort of attention to it. Or else you wouldn't do it.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:40 PM
2

You are being hypocritical. Chastising others for doing the same thing you are. Your high horse. Come down.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 05:26 PM
3

It's posted here on MRA. Someone tweeted about being groped by the TSA and she joked that he should stuff socks in his pants. You know, to make it look like he was packing a big dongle.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:18 PM
2

Oh, the irony.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:12 PM
-4

Because people who do that are pretentious.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:02 PM
-4

Hyphenated names are just fucking stupid. Either keep your surname, or adopt the new one as your own. Anything else is pretentious and screams "ATTENTION WHORE".
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:01 PM
9

Hurray hypocrisy!
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:43 PM
1

That wasn't condescending at all.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 03:31 PM
10

Punish the bastards.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:13 PM
0

Geez. This kind of whining makes me think we're no better than feminists.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:38 PM
1

Pix or it didnt happen.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:27 PM
3

No. I'm in the US. What you're describing is the opposite of how it is here. The dedicated women stores (and there are a shitload of them) are often more expensive than Target and stores like that. But that's because they know women are willing to pay more. And in my observations, a bit more picky. We have dedicated mens stores, and they can be expensive as well, but like I said, the average guy doesn't give the same shit as many women, so high prices will drive us elsewhere. For example, there …
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:18 PM
1

I believe cody_au is being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:10 PM
2

I buy 4 packs of Hanes boxers from Target for $20. Know why? Because I don't give a shit if it's plain or plaid or silk. Hey ladies, I'm going to let you in on a little secret... The cost of clothing is determined by what the market will bear. Generally speaking, women are more likely to take their fashion a bit more seriously. And they tend to clothes shop more. Fancy underwear is going to be a harder sell to men because we just don't give a fuck. But their is an entire industry dedicated to wo…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:06 PM
4

Guy has sex with drunk girl - He's a rapist Girl gets guy drunk to get pregnant = It's his fault WTF am I reading?!?
/r/MensRights14/03/13 12:54 PM
7

Talk about looking for problems where there are none. Jesus. Isn't the main protagonist in the bulk of these films female? Aren't a large chunk of these films named for the women who are the main character? When you go to Disney World, do you see Prince Charming's Castle or Cinderella's Castle? And how did it get to be her castle anyway? I'm pretty sure it was in the royal family's possession before she went to the ball. Did she win it in the divorce? That gold digging bitch loses a shoe and gai…
/r/MensRights14/03/13 12:49 AM
2

Oh SNAP!
/r/MensRights14/03/13 12:47 AM
2

A little herp, a bit of derp.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 12:44 AM
5

I make irreverent jokes on just about any given topic. And I take as good as I give. Given the right context or setting, you can find the humor in anything.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:21 PM
7

Oh for fuck's sake. If she wants a salary, let her run for office, or apply for something. She's living rent-free in the most famous mansion on the planet. Sweet Jesus. This dickhead will say anything to rally the left.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:17 PM
8

Well of course she will say that. Women have taught themselves that they are the perpetual victim in everything. Personal responsibility means nothing when there is always someone else to point a finger at, even when you're going to invite a group of boys to make you airtight.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 03:48 PM
1

Woman come standard with floatation devices.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 08:15 PM
-1

Trying to care here... Nope. Can't do it.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 08:12 PM
13

Ah, the Goldigger. Setting women back one decade at a time.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 08:11 PM
2

I know, I'm just saying it seems to me that like many rappers, an actor reaches a point where they feel their careers have prepared them for the next level of... Something. At least with rappers it's in a related field.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 02:50 PM
2

It's the same as rappers becoming actors.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 02:41 PM
2

Have you not heard of Ronald Reagan?
/r/MensRights09/03/13 02:41 PM
1

There have been many cases where it was discovered that dad was not actually the father. Mom had some cock on the side and got pregnant. But the husband or boyfriend doesn't know this, and assumes it's his. Then a few years later it comes out that no, the child is not yours, mom got pregnant while whoring it up with someone else. Divorce is usually what follows, and almost without fail, the poor sap who was duped into thinking he was the father is on the hook for child support for the next 15 ye…
/r/MensRights09/03/13 06:45 AM
3

He's still getting roles and she isn't. Also, spite.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:23 PM
6

International Men's Day is on November 19th. Did they have a men-only event with a guest speaker for that?
/r/MensRights08/03/13 07:34 PM
2

You're arguing a completely different point. I'm not saying people don't make similar jokes about women, or that those kinds of memes exist. Of course they do. Look at the uproar Seth McFarlane received for the boobs song at the Oscars. Generally speaking, jokes about woman that are deemed sexist or playing on a stereotype, or joke about abuse or rape are highly frowned up on our society. But men are fair game for the very same type of jokes. That's a double-standard. Edit: You asked for an exam…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 06:56 PM
1

She's gotta pay for the plastic surgery some how, amirite?
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:35 PM
1

I think I speak for everyone here that no one has a problem with your definition taken at face value. The problem is, women seem to ignore the inequalities, whether social, cultural, or legal, that benefit them over men. From something as benign as expecting the man to buy her the engagement ring to the men generally seen as the lesser parent in custody cases. It's not about being equal, it's about one upmanship. Special rights, for lack of a better term. There are a lot of double-standards in o…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:25 PM
7

When the majority of "X" a person sees look a certain way, anything different will look "weird". This is true for anything, including a penis.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:17 PM
-1

I'm pretty sure he's on the hook for child support either way.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:07 PM
2

Yes, but in general those are considered distasteful and disrespectful by the population at large. It's not politically correct, and gosh darn it, insensitive to victims of real abuse at the hands of men. But this? The female on male violence jokes are generally considered cute and funny. Men should suck it up and stop being so sensitive. It's a joke. Hence, the double-standard.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:05 PM
42

This brand of feminist is too stupid to see the irony and hypocrisy of such statements.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:58 PM
4

The logic in this is so faulty I don't know where to start. So I'll just say this idiot is making a circular argument, and pick any sentence and you quickly see it.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 05:29 PM
1

Based on similar articles posted here regularly, I would have thought my intent was understood.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 05:06 PM
2

Perhaps not, except that by and large women are viewed as the better nurturer, a better caretaker for children by default, and the courts often reflect this when it comes to child custody. Keeping these kinds of stories in people's collective conscience is important in dispelling that myth.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 04:30 PM
7

2 1/2 years per child. Wow.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:57 PM
1

Especially with a chancery font in a small point size.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:31 PM
3

My response would have been along the lines of swapping out some of the words with "all blacks" and "mugging" and see how fucked up it is when put in that context.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:30 PM
5

I don't think pointing out hypocrisy and double-standards in some of what goes for the feminist argument is approaching it from the wrong angle. 100 years ago, 50 years ago, yeah, feminism had a place and it's really hard to argue with the movement or what they demanded. But times have changed, and so has feminism. Just like any other special interest group, once they see some positive results, they push for more and more and more until the pendulum is now on the other side and they can't see it…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 03:08 PM
11

I had to stop reading halfway through. I can't believe this woman isn't happy that a man is being thoughtful and not playing the stereotypical sex-crazed horn dog. She wants to use this guy for sex, "objectify him", to use a favorite feminist term, and she makes it into a negative. I thought feminists were repulsed at men for behaving like she is. What a fucking hypocrite. Jesus.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 04:27 PM
4

While interesting, I'm not seeing an MRA issue here... Unless I'm missing something...
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:59 PM
-1

Pretty much this.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 04:42 AM
2

"Woman is the Nigger of the World"
/r/MensRights01/03/13 03:30 AM
3

I don't understand it. I always thought she was hot. It's her sister that looks like a beast.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 11:02 PM
1

I don't see it as playing the victim. It exposes their hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 10:57 PM
2

Since when did a big penis mean you were stupid? I mean, i'm a goddamn genius. Oh wait... Damn.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:14 AM
1

[golf clap]
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:05 PM
6

Because only white males can be racist or sexist.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:09 PM
12

People always need a group to pick on, whether it's good natured or viciously. The only group that it's acceptable to do this are males, particularly white ones. So I don't really see this trend changing, because we already know placing a woman or a minority in that role is sexist/racist.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 09:12 PM
1

No I didn't. I'm not the one who turned this into a political issue. I responded to a comment I saw was a cheapshot. Surely I'm allowed a rebuttal. In doing so I inferred we keep partisan politics out of it from here on out. For people too stupid to not understand there is nothing contradictory or hypocritical in that, well there is the downvote button. Fire away.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 05:52 PM
-20

I'm a conservative. I'm also a father. I have no misconception as to why some men are apathetic about fatherhood. In some cases, it's how these boys were raised. To be irresponsible. In other cases, laws and tradition relegate fathers to second class parenthood. We are taught to think we are the lesser parent by the state. Don't politicize this. It's liberal policies that have given women the upper hand in these situations.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:08 PM
2

Perhaps a very brief summary at the bottom. Like one sentence or two and include it in there?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 06:05 PM
27

The first 2 points basically say the same thing. Also, "keeping it in the pants" is a good point, but should probably be used elsewhere.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:34 PM
27

Some of that is a bit redundant, but good points none the less.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:18 PM
1

I fail to see the irony here.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 05:35 PM
0

I don't think that lady has anything to worry about.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:56 PM
3

Check out his rant on Carrie Underwood in one of the related videos. Much more serious tone, and he's clearly exasperated. Edit: I decided to check out some of his other podcasts. Found this one on unjust divorces. Wow. He pulls no punches.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:37 PM
5

I LOL'd
/r/MensRights16/02/13 03:13 PM
-1

I realize that. I'm not seeing any problems with what I said, or why you're on me about it.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:05 AM
-2

How am I ignoring anything about her choice? My last paragraph expressively says it her her choice and he has no say in the matter, one way or the other. She hold all the cards. And I should point out, that if it's her choice to keep it, it then becomes his responsibility too.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 02:57 AM
5

As a dad, I depend on my wife heavily in raising our child, as does she depend on me. Any single parent, mom or dad, is going to have a tough go at it alone. I really don't think you've thought this all the way through.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:54 AM
0

I'm having trouble understanding how you are so in love with the mother of your child you bang other chicks. And without a condom. As to why a woman would want a child she may not be able to afford, well... Maybe it has something to do with the fact it's a child? I'm not going to get into a debate about the morality of abortion, but it's entirely possible she feels abortion is wrong. Or maybe she simply likes the idea of motherhood. Unfortunately men don't really have a say one way or the other …
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:45 AM
5

How do you know this is an SRSer? What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 11:51 PM
1

Burning Bed. Granted, the DV goes both ways, as the husband's abuses eventually drive her to murder. But still, murder.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 07:49 PM
1

I'm not seeing as how this is MRA...
/r/MensRights10/02/13 04:57 PM
3

While those are disgusting subreddits, and I'll be honest, I wasn't aware they even existed, they don't really have anything to do with the context of what we were discussing. And I don't hate women. I'm married. I love my wife. And I have a sister. I'd kill anyone who tried to rape her. I have no interest in reading subreddits that are about hating or hurting women. However, I'm all for exposing the hypocrisy and double-standards that only men are capable of hate, sexism, and hurting their spou…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 03:09 PM
1

This is really said. I feel bad for her. Sounds to me like her dad has projected his own pig-like feelings and attitudes towards women onto all manhood. Sounds like a classic case of a fear of all the dirty thoughts and deeds he has or done to girls/women will visit him via his daughter. His own comeuppance, as it were. She should seek some professional help. I think this goes beyond Internet therapy.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 03:00 PM
2

Are you serious?
/r/MensRights06/02/13 02:30 PM
0

Because its a response to the other subreddit and the entire notion that men are predisposed to be morally inferior, or are prone to do very bad things.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 02:27 PM
2

I didn't really know a whole lot about Title IX, so on the off chance I'm not alone, here is an article that deals with the pros and cons of it. My take away from it was that while it's intentions were good, and has done some good, like a lot of these types of measures the government gets involved with, it often turns into a reversal of discrimination as the pendulum swings the other way.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:20 PM
2

Is there some sort of domestic abuse at home or sexual harassment issues at work you're having problems with? Divorce? Child custody problems? It's hard to give you an opinion or advice without knowing what's going on.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:09 PM
-1

Eat a bag of dicks.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:08 PM
1

That's probably true. It was a hot topic the other day here. The original thread shouldn't be hard to find.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 09:22 PM
1

Back atcha.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 09:19 PM
3

Again, that's a fair assessment. Stop being so reasonable.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 09:17 PM
1

I know there is, but there tends to be more of an outrage (for lack of a better term) when it is dealing with a women.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 09:07 PM
7

That's fair I guess. I just know there is a thin line between legitimate gripe and being a whiney attention whore. A case like this is a good way to pint out double-standards, but its not enough to get me all pissed off.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:47 PM
0

You have a failed view if what malware is. But whatever.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 08:44 PM
-6

Fanboys are so cute when they're rabid.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:50 PM
-2

Sounds like you have some untwisting to do yourself, bud.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:38 PM
-14

I'm aware of that, as I said in response to another post. And thats fine some people don't want an Apple product. That doesn't make it malware, I'm calling the guy out for being a fanboy douche.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:13 PM
20

Absolutely. Being overly sensitive about jokes and gags is career for a lot of feminists. I don't think we should be that petty.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:03 PM
6

The link works on iOS devices. It takes you to the App Store. Clicking the link in a browser on the Mac redirects to iTunes. I assume if you have iTunes installed on a PC the result would be the same. In other words, the link works (mostly).
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:00 PM
-2

This statement makes no sense.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:57 PM
1

This doesn't sound suspicious at all.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:58 PM
6

I don't think the Onion could have written this any crazier. At least if they did it would be a joke. Jesus, this bitch is nuts of epic proportions.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:50 PM
1

You honestly think feminists don't like this myth being perpetuated? That there aren't people who still pretend it's true, despite the fact it's been debunked? That is the dumbest thing I've ever read. Take a look at this article from last year. Even though the author (a man, surprisingly) tackles the issue as being a hoax, he spends the bulk of his article trying to debunk the debunkers, and still push through some correlation of violence from men on Super Bowl Sunday. This is a long article, b…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 02:14 PM
1

That's why I put the word CLAIMS in there. It's implied. And if one reads the article, you'll see that is what she CLAIMS. It's right in the damn headline! How is that misleading? Christ, what is up with this subreddit? I posted this in an attempt to be even-handed and I'm being questioned about something like that? This is the 3rd time this week and 2nd time today I was called out for some anal thing as a word or punctuation mark or something misleading. Holy crap, is this what MRA has devolved…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:09 PM
2

I hardly think what I said was "hysterical" or an exaggeration at all. If the lie that men are more abusive on the Super Bowl is ignored or perpetuated to keep awareness alive, then I said nothing inaccurate IMO. Pot-TAY-to, po-TAH-to. The important thing is this myth prevails and is allowed to continue by those who see an opportunity to perpetuate another myth, that men are naturally misogynistic and dangerous. I'll counter and say that if it comes to getting all pedantic and splitting hairs, o…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 07:51 PM
2

The "keep pretending" part comes in when some people keep perpetuating this myth, or at least turn a blind eye to it because some "good" comes out of it by bringing male on female violence into the discussion (not domestic violence in general). For example, a quote from this article from last December: What is the bottom line on this issue? Flanders' article spelled it out: "Workers at women's shelters, and some journalists, have long reported that Super Bowl Sunday is one of the year's worst da…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 02:41 PM
1

Thank you, good sir/madam. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 01:57 AM
27

All I can say is WOW. They aren't even subtle about it.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 11:49 PM
2

You must be a blast at parties.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:40 PM
0

Perhaps you should. I don't fault you for thinking its interesting. I fault you for the rest of your title. That's where you're overreacting. Sometimes a joke is a joke. Save the rage for something that really matters.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:22 PM
-1

Yeah, it is.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:14 PM
0

Yeah, we'll you read way more into that than I did. I was thinking it had something to do with gun rights or something. Still, I think you're overreacting. This kind of overreacting is what I would expect from some feminists.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:03 PM
1

It's the same thing when it comes to race relations, at least in the US. It's hardly surprising.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 09:51 PM
1

You're not helping...
/r/MensRights01/02/13 09:49 PM
4

What the hell does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights01/02/13 09:44 PM
3

WTF is this I don't even...
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:00 PM
2

I upvote the both of you.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:07 PM
12

I agree. I thought it was only fair to post her side since I posted the initial story the other day.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:03 PM
2

Not only predictable, but expected. This shit is being reported on a couple of times a week now.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:54 PM
3

Yeah, I'm not seeing the problem with this. Of course, I don't know all the facts, but a boy mistreating a girl the makes the boy the problem. Same as a girl mistreating a boy makes the girl the problem. It's called personally responsibility. And the parents might bear some of that.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:51 PM
0

T.I.T.s?
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:48 PM
4

Yep, it needs to be gender neutral, however worded.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:46 PM
2

Not much, I guess. But I imagine some men or women may be traumatized enough from the ordeal, particularly after a really bad episode, that being around a member of the opposite sex could be a bit unnerving. These people are scared or angry or depressed and life seems upside down I imagine. They need to feel safe and comfortable. Put it into context here. I'm not threatened at all by this story, and neither should you be.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 03:14 PM
3

What's wrong with a shelter for battered women?
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:06 AM
1

Yes, a journal is a great idea. Any recipes for things you buy the kids. Be careful about recording people without their permission though. That can get you in to trouble.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:36 AM
2

It really depends on a few variables. The judge, your lawyer, is there anything she can use against you, is there anything you can use against her... Generally, yes, it's tougher on fathers to get custody. You may have to settle for joint-physical. But it's not impossible to gain sole custody. You're going to have to be strong. And be careful, don't give her any ammo to use against you when you talk to her.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:09 AM
1

I did not realize that. Damn.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:03 AM
5

I have joint-legal. I caved in. My ex and i went back and forth over that and joint-physical. I settled for that on a promise from my ex-wife that she'd never keep him from me and never move. She moved out of state 1 year later. I still get to see him but not as often as I like. It's a 4 hour round trip on those weekends and after 11 years its gotten really grueling. Don't give up joint-physical. Do whatever you can. Don't be stupid like me.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 01:57 AM
1

Im not clear, is your divorce finalized? Or were you guys even married? if not, hardwarequestions is correct. You need to lawyer up. It would be nice if she could be counted on to keep her word and everyone be friendly, but since that isn't happening, you need to get the law working for you, and I'd say the sooner the better. You do not want to concede this kind of control to her.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:56 AM
2

Womyn: "It's not sexist when we do it!"
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:29 PM
0

I'll resort to name calling and the like when people like yourself are unreasonable and too eager to slam someone for no reason at all. you get what you give. Lose the chip on your shoulder, asshole. To clarify, that edit you're so up in arms about was me realizing leading off like that sounded a bit harsh, and didn't come out the way I intended. It was an attempt to avoid what you're doing now, not some devious plot to stir you up and make you look like the bad guy. That's all. In fact, you had…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:47 AM
0

Shut up, asshole.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 04:28 AM
5

There's no shame in avoiding a potentially bad situation. One needs to pick and choose their battles. Besides, what will a confrontation get you? Confirmation that you're creepy, or possibly threatening? A call down to HR? It may be as simple as the girl is just misinterpreting things. Or she may be a loose canon. Better to not give her enough rope to hang yourself with. There is a difference between standing up for what's right and ignoring some stupid office gossip. Stop being so melodramatic.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:18 PM
4

Is it pathetic? Oh yeah. But women have been willing to sell it and men have been willing to buy it for millennia. If they are two consenting adults and no laws are broken, I couldn't care less.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:33 PM
4

I wouldn't confront her. I would simply avoid her or say as little as possible without letting it interrupt any work. By confronting her, even in a calm amd mature way, she may perceive that as a threat since she already finds you creepy. If she goes to HR it's her word against yours and there is a good bet they will side with her because she's the female, and harassment charges from females are scary things to a company. It wouldn't be a bad idea of going to your boss and explaining. Just so th…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:25 PM
2

How this is a hate group. I took a browse over SRS to see what it was all about. Now that place... I couldn't tell if they were being intentionally ironic or if that's really how those people think.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:57 PM
-1

I'm an atheist, so no religious conviction. If I did, I'd be a proponent for marriage, period. You take marriage off the table for any and all reasons. OK, fine. I have no qualms with that. But excuse me if I'm not so far gone I've lost all faith in women, that I can't understand someone wanting a traditional family. I'm fine if they don't get married. I'm fine if they do. It's not really my business. That doesn't make me wrong or you right. It just makes me think you have some serious resentmen…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:42 AM
1

What? Really? I don't understand...
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:18 AM
4

Putting one's self in another person's shoes is usually a pretty good approach to understanding anything. I'm not following what the problem is with the author.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 04:10 AM
-1

OK, well here is the thing. I didn't say that if people want children, they absolutely MUST get married. I said the only reason I can see getting married is if they wanted children. These are two different things. Look, I've been divorced, and she took my son and moved out of state. I'm not exactly talking out of my ass here and I don't need a lecture. I still stand by my opinion that I don't see the point of marriage unless perhaps you want to have children. If you don't like it, oh well, but d…
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:53 AM
2

Woah woah woah... She's female, black, gay, AND disabled? All she needs is a Hispanic name and she will be set for life. This school is screwed.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:28 AM
2

Even unmarried, a woman will get large chunks of your money for child support. She can take the kids away regardless. Being unmarried doesn't solve that issue. So I stand by my opinion.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:51 AM
7

According to this article carriers don't save text messages forever, but each carrier seems to vary on when they delete them from their servers.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 01:54 AM
3

I thought I read somewhere that text messages aren't kept indefinitely. Good to know.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 01:42 AM
0

I wonder what they would call it when your ex-girlfriend stops by the apartment unannounced, comes on to you, and locks her legs around you so you can't pull out, thus getting her pregnant? That's what happened to me. I married that girl trying to be a good person. She left me 2 years later, taking my son. She now lives in another state.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:34 PM
25

It may be something as simple as she is afraid of losing her boyfriend and made up some scenario to exonerate herself, and now it's gone too far. You really need to cover your ass and lay out everything to a lawyer. Don't lie, don't hide anything, just tell him/her everything to the best of your memory and try to see about retrieving old phone records.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:58 PM
30

If you go to court your phone provider should be able to get those records for you, unless they are ancient. Seriously, at least consult a lawyer. Ask about that. That might make a difference.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:52 PM
38

Lawyer up ASAP. Any records of texts sent (or not sent) will help.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:48 PM
0

I see. I wasn't aware I was a woman hater. How would you classify SS and yourself? I never really looked through SRS before until now. And all I can say is WOW.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:19 PM
0

Are you implying MR is a hate group?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:07 PM
3

To the surprise of no one.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 06:09 PM
2

Please tell me this was taken from the Onion.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 06:08 PM
9

The only reason i can see getting married these days is if you both want children. Other than that, I don't really see the point. Have her keep a toothbrush and her favorite shampoo at your place but leave it at that.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 06:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter