TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throwaway50bil Archive

View 2 posts and 214 comments by throwaway50bil on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

My dad raised me, I'm not mad at him at all. Realistically, I'm not mad at my mother, either, though. They were young, and chose to do what was best for me once it was clear that they were going to split.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 11:36 PM
1

...not all men want to provide, and not all women want to nurture. Soooo...nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 11:35 PM
0

Clinton did, if I recall correctly...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 07:13 AM
1

Not from what I've seen, but that is anecdotal.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 07:03 AM
-1

Yeah, I'll give you that. 'Might makes right' is always an inappropriate response. Suffice to say that I know many men that have dated/married single mothers, that are not 'cucks'.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 07:02 AM
1

But the other part of my comment was that the same level of vitriol is not present in similar female-centric subs...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:55 AM
-1

Kewl beans.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:54 AM
3

Truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:52 AM
3

Nothing wrong with not dating/fucking single moms, if that is your preference... And what that other poster commented is not devoid of fact, just kinda self-centered. A woman (and also a man) does not need to be a complete shitshow to lose custody. The father of one of my nieces went to jail shortly after she was born, because daddy did a dumbass thing. He drove drunk and his best friend died because of the wreck. He still has a really good custody schedule (and he is getting better as a father,…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:48 AM
0

I'm happy to be challenged. I just haven't been, yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:32 AM
1

IRL is totes different than online, though. I also have not seen much IRL hatred for single moms...but it's different when every time you log on to FB/Reddit/whatever, you see things that make you feel like shit for being a single mom...or, even worse, state that the children of single mothers will almost definitely become criminals. The current kiddo generation has way more access to the internet than any generation before...and if they type in the wrong search phrase, or go looking around in f…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:30 AM
2

...I...yeah, this is pretty accurate. I was hoping for a rational explanation, but the more comments I read, the less faith I have in the common sense of humanity. Damn.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:08 AM
1

Ah, so you do understand that correlation != causation. You just want to be picky about it. Cool. You do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:07 AM
0

I don't blame single dads (assuming that they are single due to someone else's choices) for anything. Well for one single motherhood is completely out of hand Yeah, cuz they ended up pregnant all by themselves. You also can't blame single dads too much because most men just don't have the options that (young) women do. Sure men want good women, but can they get them? Not to mention that there just isn't many good women to choose from anymore. This...doesn't make much sense. What options?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:05 AM
2

Ah, I see where you were coming from. It's hypocritical and generally shitty, but I get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:00 AM
1

And for the dumbass that thinks hueristics are comprehensive. Poor guy will pass up all sorts of opportunities, with that mindset. As I said elsewhere, I DGAF who dates single moms, or who won't. Really. It doesn't affect me in the slightest. But hueristics are a shit mechanism for sole determination of...anything. Hueristics alone can't even make a comprehensive firewall, and that shit is waaay less complicated than humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 05:53 AM
1

That's depressing af. Probably teue, but still depressing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 05:49 AM
1

Ah, yes, a handful of stories are 'routine'. Just before the Covid thing, my father had an issue with one of my sisters. She's autistic af, threw a fit in a restaurant, and screamed for the cops when my dad physically carried her out to the family van. Somebody called (as they should), and cops did show up (as they should). My dad was a bit nervous, but there was no real trouble about it. And that's only one story that I have personal experience with. So your two sources are a bit outnumbered. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 05:46 AM
2

positive condescension? This is an awesome phrase, I'm absolutely stealing it (if that's okay) many of these comments come from the idea that it's the mother's sole responsibility to take care of the kids so when the father does it, it's deserving of praise. It also pushes the idea that fathers aren't as good of care takers as mothers Absolutely agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 05:41 AM
1

I wish. IRL, you're probably right. But even just on PPD, it's a pretty common thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 05:39 AM
1

No, it hasn't. Nor has it occurred to them that abuse is also a good reason to leave. They don't care, they just want to be able to point to statistics to justify their own issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 05:38 AM
-2

Huh. For the most part, the men that I know that married single mothers would probably kick the shit out of anyone that called them a 'cuck'. But you go ahead and feel free. I'll record it...oughta be fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 05:35 AM
1

Or maybe I'm quoting something that has been proven. Correlation does not equal causation. Take a fucking Psych 101 class, and they'll explain that to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 05:33 AM
4

Read the actual language of the WIC program in the link I provided. I did when I commented, I re-read just now, and I had a pretty good grasp on it when my oen son could no longer be breastfed. The launguage may not be inclusive, but WIC literally exists to support pregnant/breastfeeding women, infants, and children under 5. So if you cannot/do not breastfeed (as a male or female), you get the same support - which is focussed on the infant/child. Breastfeeding is supposed to be more nutritious, …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 05:31 AM
3

Then judges are biased, Which is not the fault of the woman... I beleive the animosity comes from the relationship between rights and responsibilities. If you have all the rights, therefore you have all the responsibilities. Which, in the 11% of custody cases that actually end up in front of a judge...is still the judge's decision. If you look at it from a different angle, it gives women incentives to leave the fathers Why? So they can be single mothers that still don't have enough money to trea…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 05:22 AM
1

They don’t hate the women, they hate the entitlements What effing entitlements, though? Again, I'm in the US, so all of my experience is based on that locale...but, at least in the state that I live in, male and female single parents have the exact same access to government help...are you thinking something else when you say 'entitlement'?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 05:09 AM
2

Single fathers should be treated better. Single parents in general ought to be treated better, but the recognition for single fathers does have room to improve. Stepping up to do what must be done while playing the role of nurturer is far more respected and admirable on both sides Only if people don't already think you oughta be the nurturing parent - thus, why men are praised and women are just 'expected' to do it. Imagine being a woman and you're born to nuture and you can't even do that lmao …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 05:00 AM
6

...nowhere near the answer I was expecting, but you get hella props for originality lol...and you're not wrong 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 04:51 AM
0

{Unspecified ethnicity} doesn't hide your racism. Also statistically single mothers produce worst children who grow up to become future school shooters, future drug dealers, future mentally ill, future homeless people, future drug addicts, future violent abusers, future rapists, future child abusers, etc etc etc So do two-parent families...bot as often, but it definitely still happens. Really, though...why aren't you blaming the absent parent instead of the parent that raised the kid? If the abs…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 04:44 AM
2

Doesn't change the fact that the number of cases that even make it to family court are pretty minimal, which means that those are already the most contentious cases. And no, not 'all'. I'll give 'more than half', depending on the state and the specific laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 04:19 AM
2

I may have phrased my OP badly, I agree. As far as female-centric subs...I don't actually see much one way or the other about single dads, so they're still miles ahead of places like RedPill, MGTOW, MensRights, etc that go out of their way to shit on single moms.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 04:16 AM
13

Single fathers (in the US, when speaking about federal aid) are just as eligible for assistance as single mothers are. Not a single piece of paperwork that is filled out for SNAP, WIC, daycare subsidies, health insurance, TANF, Section 8...gonna stop here cuz that's already a helluva list...none of those programs gaf about the gender of the parent. You say WIC doesn't help single fathers, but your own link says otherwise - the only benefits that cannot be reaped by single fathers on WIC, are tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 04:14 AM
25

Single fathers absolutely do get the short end when in comes to interacting with the kid's school/daycare/doctors/etc. No argument about that, at least not from me. My dad raised me on his own, and not only did it seem to make him more desirable to women, but it also garnered respect and allowances at work, that he would not have gotten had he been a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 04:04 AM
-2

Men and women only have as much power as the judge gives them, in family court. The judge is the be-all-end-all. Aside from that, you have given good reasons for a disenfranchised father to hate the mother of his child/ren...but not why society (at least on PPD and several other subs) has decided that single mothers are shit, but single fathers are great.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 04:01 AM
1

I hear you, and I don't disagree...I am a single parent, that was raised by a single parent, and that should never be a goal. It's hard, it's thankless, and it's just not optimal (no matter how much a parent loves their children!). Unfortunately, though, once a relationship deteriorates to the point that one parent is willing to be a single parent, though, reconciliation is likely off the table - married or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 03:12 AM
5

Gotta love being a man dating as a single father is infinitely easier than the other side Of course it is...because single father are held in higher regard than single mothers. Sooo...you essentially agree with the basis of my OP. Single fathers are treated better than single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 03:06 AM
-1

Eh, ish. We haven't had that kind of biological imperative in centuries, though. At this point, the bias is almost definitely social.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 03:03 AM
1

I live in the US, so that's my primary perspective. On the legal bias topic, it's only about 11% of custody cases that are even brought before a judge. There is indeed legal bias...but which parent is the beneficiary varies amongst states, counties, and the specific judge assigned to the case. I grew up in a shithole rural town and I've seen pretty much every situation under the sun. Court rulings aren't usually why outsiders consider someone to be a good parent or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 03:02 AM
1

Fair enough. Depressing way to live, I think, but entirely your right to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 02:51 AM
6

Prenups are whole different complicated beast. If they're made in good faith, done properly, and only have clauses that are legal (in the state that the prenuo was enacted) they are usually upheld. It's usually when one or more of those stipulations is inacurate that everything goes to shit, and that's on the the spouse (and lawyer) that originally drafted it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 02:49 AM
2

You're not wrong, which is a whole extra rant that I didn't feel like getting into. I just don't understand how doing the bare minimum of raising one's own children causes such a varied and visceral response solely based on that parent's gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 02:46 AM
2

Correlation does not mean causation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 02:44 AM
2

Because there haven't been studies about it? Cuz that's what I'm guessing. I sure af haven't found any. So if you want to go by statistics, you should probably make sure that you have conprehemsive data to look at before making a decision. What's out there right now is not comprehensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 02:37 AM
3

Most of us have exhibited poor judgement at times in our lives (unless they're young, in which case just give it time). I think the question should be more about 'have they learned anything', when discussing single parents of either gender, when they're moving towards a new relationship. If they understand how they got to where they are, and are trying to do better, I don't think it should be held against them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 02:35 AM
2

See, this is pretty much exactly what I think it is. Thank you for saying it so clearly!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 02:30 AM
2

The thing that screws the kids is when they have bad parents. This is true even in cases where both parents are present...so why the unequal opinion on single parents?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 02:23 AM
6

There are many other subs that also have that hatred. In real life, though, yeah...I don't see an awful lot of hatred for single mothers...but I see a fuckload of praising the single fathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 02:22 AM
9

I see it consistently on PPD, as well as many male-centric subs. I do not see an equivalent amount of vitriol (going the other direction) on most female-centric subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 02:19 AM
2

They also have a very entitled attitude about their single motherhood, which just makes them unlikeable. Some do, I won't deny that. I don't understand it and try not to play into it, but some do indeed act that way. I think of single fathers who stick around neutrally, but I think single moms are scum unless they're widows or the like, because most what that leads to single parenthood are a result of the woman's selection of men This, however, was part of my initial point...you view single fath…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 01:51 AM
3

But exceptional means the bar is low This. This is really all I was trying to convey in my OP. The exact same job is treated differently depending on the gender of the person doing it, and it's usually literally the basic fricking qualifications for that particular job. So far, I haven't seen a realistic, factual answer for why men are celebrated and women shunned, for the exact same circumstance.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 01:45 AM
6

More likely to perform well, yeah, absolutely - because (involved) fathers tend to be the driving force behind things like competition and 'acceptable' behavior, etc. Unfortunately, they don't tend to be great with the emotional/mental side of things. Single-parent (of either gender) households have issues. So do many two-parent households. This doesn't explain why one gender is lauded and the other despised, for doing the same job.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 01:42 AM
7

Makes sense. Fucked up on many levels, but is unfortunately accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 01:35 AM
6

I know a few kids that will be relieved to know that their future has already been decided by statistics. (/s)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 01:34 AM
15

The mis-information about abortion, unfortunately, is pretty much purposeful (in the US, anyway). Either it's super easy!!11!1! or it's murder. The only in-between perspectives I have seen, are the ones from women who have actually had to go through it. It's also insane that the loudest voices against abortion are generally also the traditionalists that will shame a mother for her husband/partner leaving.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 01:33 AM
19

Only about 11% of custody cases in the US actually end up in court, so...there are some 'helluva guy' types out there, and I admire their tenacity for sure, I even know a few personally...but it's is a fairly small percentage in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 01:27 AM
6

Single moms are some of the biggest scammers out there. You didn't exactly iterate on that massive first statement. a) They even bother trying to raise a child themselves and So they're lauded for doing what the mother is already just expected to do? b) They actually won the ability to raise the child themselves because courts are pro-woman and The court systems are shit in general. I'm willing to stipulate that family court is, statistically, worse for men - but I've seen some cases where the c…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 01:24 AM
11

Fair enough lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 01:18 AM
3

But not the other way around? This is kinda highlighting what I was talking about...the statements in your comment seem to be automatically assumed by a decent chunk of society, and it really kinda screws the kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 01:17 AM
13

I dunno, all my dad had to do was screw up his marriage enough that my mom left. Doesn't seem super complicated. Then again, they were both good people, just young and incompatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 12:55 AM
8

Criminals are the leading cause of crime. Full stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 12:54 AM
9

And those women whose partners were supportive of the pregnancy and then things went sour after the birth? Hell, my own father did purposely knock up my mother...he wanted to marry her, they did that, and he was a shitty husband (his words, not mine, from an honest conversation that we had after I'd become an adult). Then he raised me after my mom left, because he was a shitty husband but a good father. My existence actually was at least half his choice, the whole way through...but he never had …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 12:52 AM
6

Not exactly. Statistically, children in single-mother households do worse in several metrics - but since single-father households are a bit more rare, it's not really valid to compare the two via statistics (unless there's a bunch of above-my-head math done to equivocate the two scenarios, which isn't the case in most of the studies that I've seen). And that's leaving out the fact that statistics are...just statistics. The information is gathered based on a finite number of data points (as any s…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 12:45 AM
1

Dunno about other countries, but the majority of politicians in the US are already men...and the pandering of the weak ones tends to appeal to the voting public more than the ethicality of the strong ones, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:15 AM
1

Much like anyone else who has bills to pay - this only works for a short period of time, if at all.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:11 AM
2

That is absolutely insane! Thank you for the walkthrough, it was very interesting. I'm glad you finally got justice, but it really is crazy that you had to go through all of that just to be released!
/r/MensRights28/06/21 12:00 AM
2

Ugh.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 11:50 PM
0

So you identified with Bitch-Tits Bob. I guess you have breast cancer? I am so sorry, and I really do hope that you recover. But I do kinda still wish that someone would take up the flag of the actual symbolism in Fight Club, and burn down the credit system. Edited to add: please do explain the symbolism in Fight Club that disenfrachises men. Please. Because apparently I'm too stupid to see it.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 07:19 AM
0

Addressing each point in turn: 1) Excluding crazy-ass TERFs, the folks with trans issues don't really seem to gaf what the starting-ending gender is. They're just weirdly pissed that someone can change from one to the other. 2) If a MtF human would like to have their penis removed, why is it anyone else's business? How does that normalize emasculation for men that do not want to be women? Seems a pretty narrow viewpoint. Also, if I recall, Fight Club had everything to do with fighting authority …
/r/MensRights24/06/21 06:53 AM
11

My son is 12, and I would happily erase anyone that took advantage of him in that way, courts be damned. So...good. She oughta get life, just like any other pedo.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 06:37 AM
22

....soooo they're upholding the first amendement. Damn good on them, but it shouldn't be celebrated...it should be expected.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 06:35 AM
-3

Oh gee. A show that originally had misogynistic undertones was turned into a series of movies that did not have those tones. What a fucking shame that they made it harder for us to fap to it. Darn.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 06:34 AM
1

I'm happy to engage - from my perspective, you found a post that irritated you, and then you ranted about it elsewhere, despite it not actually being a discrimination against the population of the sub that you ranted to. I say that it's not a discrimination because the OP did not, at any point, recommend against having a male Uber driver, she simply gave a tip that had helped her to not be harassed in a particular situation. I've never felt unsafe when garnering an Uber, so I literally cannot ac…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 06:24 AM
1

I mean...you may not be wrong. I'm old enough to remember when J-Lo caused a fuckova media stir by wearing a dress that was so low-cut that she had to tape her boobs into it. Now, that's normal for runway/red carpet, hell even prom dresses. But the real issue isn't whether it's choice or influence - the issue is why does anyone feel the need to comment/shame anyone (of any gender) for what they choose to wear?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 06:13 AM
62

No. But when it does happen, it's under-reported, which adds to the imbalance in statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 06:08 AM
1

Or maybe they just had shitty fathers?
/r/MensRights24/06/21 06:06 AM
1

Your deconstruction is derailed as soon as you type 'anecdotal', like that somehow makes the OP's experience invalid. Although a re-read did point out something I'd missed, that this was about Australia. I have no clue how shit happens in Australia. Maybe y'all just haven't had any gig drivers sued for assault.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 06:02 AM
1

There's a Single Parent's day in March? How tf have I not heard about this? Ima go look that up and start promoting the duck out of it, as someone who was raised by a single parent and then unexpectedly became one.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 05:54 AM
1

Fukifino, you had a main post and a comment and both seemed to be directed at bitching about TwoX. I'm mostly just saying that I dunno why anyone (who isn't the person ordering the Uber to begin with) gives a fuck what anyone does to feel more safe when literally asking some stranger from the internet to come pick them up. So I guess I was asking you...why do you gaf what anyone else does, to make them feel okay when ordering a ride from a rando on the internet? Does it affect you, in any tangib…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 05:50 AM
0

There are plenty of feminists who hate men. No argument there. The mother of my half-brother was one of them - we haven't heard fron my brother in over a decade because of that. Are you what could be considered a conservative Fundie in the US? If not, that comment was not about you, and there's no need to be defensive. If you were talking about medieval monks tormented by inner desires for women viewing them as harlots trying to draw them into sin, yes. Plenty of historical facts that support ex…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 05:46 AM
1

Screenshot is a troll. But if it's not...yeah, it's fucking toxic to desert your family, without even a conversation, just because you lost your job. Sorry, dad-from-the-screenshot, you really fucked up, and it's only your fault.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 05:24 AM
0

Sooo that indicates to me that you don't actually pay attention, at least not when she's watching SVU. Hargitay and Meloni were equal costars until around season 11 or 12, when they bounced Meloni because they wrote his character into a corner...not his fault, not her fault, totally the writer's fault...and then gave him his own show. Hargitay did kinda get her own show when they bounced Meloni, but it was incidental, not purposeful. Meloni actually got the better end of that stick - if nothing …
/r/MensRights24/06/21 05:19 AM
1

Dude, at the waaay-back time of the beginning of the prevalence of the internet, the cardinal rules were that you never meet anyone from online IRL, and you never give them real identifying information. Uber (and DoorDash, and many other 'gig' apps) have turned that upside down...but anyone born before '00 at least, were all (gender exclusive) taught not to do exactly what those apps want us to do. Is it any wonder that some people still have lingering issues with those teachings? No, it really …
/r/MensRights24/06/21 05:04 AM
1

Not just a notebook (although that is also good!), he needs to be saving all electronic communications (text, Messenger, email, whatever) in as close to the original format as is possible. Anything that relates to his interaction with his children (and refusals from the mother) especially needs to be documented. Having saves/downloads that can be preserved exactly as they were written will be the most helpful. I've got kind of the opposite situation, my ex was abusive and disappeared, but occasi…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 04:27 AM
1

In order to more clearly understand the impetus of this comment - do you have kids? If so, do you have at least one of each gender? Sure, I knew a few 'little princesses' when I was a kid...but I also knew a few 'little princes' that were equally coddled. And they all tended to be bullies, regardless of gender. So realistically, us parents just need to not spoil the fuck out of our kids (whether they have an innie or an outie between their legs). Some kids will still turn out shitty no matter wh…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 04:17 AM
1

But unlike Nazi Germany being part of a church is voluntary. Sort of. In the US, your parents dictate your religion (or lack thereof) until you're 18. Different examples - don't recall the specific name, but they're colloquially known as the 'Kisser' church, mostly prevalent in parts of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho. I worked with the cousin of a 3yo child that died because the parents were members of that church, and that church would excommunicate members if they or their children utilized any…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 03:59 AM
1

Anyone that's ever been in a DV situation, regardless of gender, does think those things...and they always will, even after they've escaped and gotten the kids out. Just occurred to me...could be interesting to push a more equal court experience for family cases by requiring that there be both a DV victim of each gender, and a non-victim of each gender, in the courtroom to evaluate...kind of like a modified jury. The DV victims would see things that the non-victims wouldn't notice, and the non-v…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 03:45 AM
-2

In regards to the second paragraph...Hitler also seemed to actually believe that his Holocaust would make the world a better place. That doesn't mean he was right. Just because the leaders of a misogynistic religion say that they don't hate women, doesn't make it true. In regards to the first paragraph - I was raised Catholic from 12yo on, spent 6th-9th grade at a private non-denominational Christian school, spent my high school years at a public HS that had at least 40% Mormon students, and dab…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 03:36 AM
3

This may sound like I'm questioning validity, but I'm really just curious...two years is a helluva long time to be held without trial, how'd they manage to keep bumping it? Also, as a layman with no industry knowledge, just a basic understanding of DNA testing and some legal procedures...why didn't your lawyer insist on an independent verified DNA test, if you knew the results to be false?
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:58 AM
2

I get the religious opposition, but why tf do feminists care about opposing it?
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:48 AM
3

"Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's" would be a great thing to toss back at them, assuming they recognize the New Testament.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:48 AM
1

Your friend need a lawyer yesterday. He needs to continue to attempt to see his children (unless a restraining order specifically prevents contact with the mother), and document every time that he is refused reasonable contact with the children. He needs to save every written communication between himswlf and the mother, and should attempt to only communicate in recordable ways (unsure if Alaska is a one- or two-party state for consent to phone call recordings). But mostly, he really needs a law…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:41 AM
-2

But I've never even heard of a movement that hates women. I mean.... ever, anywhere. The majority of Conservative Judeo-Christians in the US. They'll couch it in alternate phrasing, but a single look at the foundations of their various religious ideologies makes it pretty clear that they consider women to be 'less' than men. ETA: apparently I stirred up some shit with the Fundies. Oops.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:34 AM
1

Ah, no clue about UK courts. Best of luck to the guy, if he wants to see his kid then it's worth trying to fight it.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 01:20 AM
0

Depends on the state, but your buddy can actually fight the adoption with a fairly decent chance at success. If she won't let him see the kid anyway, though, it may not be worth it - adoption would take him off the hook for child support.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 12:41 AM
1

Group projects are the effing worst.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 12:36 AM
1

I mean, I get where you're coming from, but not a single one of those points (excpet maybe the bossy one) has anything to do with wanting her actual intellectual input.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 12:33 AM
1

It looks as though your post has been deleted, so I can't read what you added about vasectomies. And I'm not trying to be argumentative either, honestly - like I've said, I don't disagree with your ideas, I just think that they're a bit more complicated in practice. In the spirit of not just shooting you down (I didn't actually mean to come off that way, I do apologize): As far as vasectomies (and surgical sterilization for women), I think both should be covered by all medical insurances and be …
/r/MensRights24/06/21 12:25 AM
2

I'm curious, have any male youths attempted to sue the Girl Scouts organization for not letting them in? Cuz my guess is that it hasn't happened simply because there haven't been any boys who cared enough about joing GS to throw a legal fit about it. And from what I've heard, I don't blame them...GS sounds boring AF.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 11:45 PM
1

So these women were living in low income housing and collecting welfare while the father of the child lived with them and worked under the table How would legalizing paternal surrender fix this issue? Sounds like the fathers in these cases are in fact attempting to support their children...being in need of financial assistance isn't just the domain of single mothers, I know plenty of two-parent families that also struggle to make ends meet. Or were you more implying that these things are already…
/r/MensRights23/06/21 11:35 PM
2

Honest question, what do you think that prostitution has to do with narcissism? Also, prostitution has pretty much always been somewhat normal, even when illegal and/or looked down on...there's a reason that it's called the oldest profession.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 11:14 PM
1

Disclaimer: US-based, commenting from that perspective. In theory, these are valid (and not at all new) ideas/observations. In practice, there are some issues. What another commentor said about taxpayers paying for those children that the fathers didn't want is a good example. Personally, I'm all for expanding the social safety net programs anyway, which could pave the way for paternal surrender of rights, but a good chunk of the US population disagrees with the existence of those programs to be…
/r/MensRights23/06/21 10:48 PM
2

Noticing the shirt is inevitable. Gawking is a choice. Gawking is rude, whether you're gawking at a see-through shirt, a homeless person, someone with visible disabilities, etc. Might not make one a perv, but it's still not socially acceptable.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 12:25 AM
4

It's lowering trucks that's the real travesty. Lifting just makes sense, especially if it's 4wd.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 12:21 AM
1

Late 20s/early 30s tends to be a woman's sexual peak, so if you want to get a lot of action, that's not a bad range to date in.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 12:20 AM
3

My thoughts exactly...what does this even mean??
/r/MensRights21/06/21 12:15 AM
12

Wow. You are a living, breathing argument for the necessity of feminism. Congratulations, truly.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 03:41 AM
6

So...women don't actually need men. Glad that you agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 03:28 AM
1

they should decrmininalize sex worker and protect their working rights, but punish the buyer. I can't say 'all', but I'd definitely say that 'most' of the folks looking to decriminalize sex work have no interest in continuing to criminalize the clients...that would be incredibly counter-productive.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 01:22 AM
2

She's likely to be stoned, or subjected to some other sort of honor-related punishment. He's unlikely to face any repercussion unless he was stupid enough to rape her within the sight range of several witnesses that are willing to tell the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 10:52 PM
2

They still seem to think that women are some sort of hive-mind. Thus 'All' WALT, instead of 'Some' or even 'Most'. It's both hilarious and depressing. The idea that they shouldn't listen to a woman when she straight out tells them what's up, that's their biggest problem. If my partner directly told me they need X and Y, it's not my place to question their needs - it's my place to decide if I can satisfy those needs, while not adversely affecting myself. Dudes that cry 'AWALT', at least from what…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 10:18 PM
1

Trying to appease women always makes things worse, not better. With this attitude, I'm not surprised.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 05:48 PM
5

I mean, if he gained fiddy pounds, yeah, dropping it will probably help. 'Choreplay', as you put it, does help. I am insanely attracted to my partner, but if I spend my days doing school/work/housework, and my partner only pursues hobbies that do not contribute to the family, attraction stops mattering as much - even if I'm physically 'in the mood', stress detracts from the ability to be fully present during intimacy (sexual or otherwise).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 11:14 PM
3

Yeah. I finally came to this conclusion - and the house is now disgusting. I'm not going back to doing the majority, so the house will stay that way...but if I hadn't grown up in similar mess, I wouldn't be nearly as blasè about it as I am.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/21 11:07 PM
0

I mean, there's a difference there. There are things that legally need to be covered, there are things that society expects to be covered, and then there's dress codes for work/school. Anything other than what needs to be covered legally, or is required by a dress code at a particular location, is just policing based on other's comfort.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 11:00 PM
1

Telling a man to 'grow a pair' or 'be a man' is fucking toxic on its own. Men are human. You are human. Humans have emotions, and hard times, and issues that fuck with their heads. That does not make you any less of a man.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 03:37 AM
5

If there is no custody order in place, and you are on the birth certificates for your kids, it's very likely that you can take the kids and leave without legal repercussion. I'd double-check the law in your state to make sure, but that sounds like your best option. Start putting necessities aside, in boxes, anything easy to grab...make arrangements with family or friends, prepare to run at the first possible opportunity...and then when you have any time without her in the house, go.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 03:32 AM
0

So women should decide what to wear based on the possible responses of men that may be near them? That's...interesting.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 03:23 AM
6

I mean, if these numbers are accurate, you'd have a decent shot at being able to have a kid and then not have to pay for it (because some other guy would be legally forced to pay).
/r/MensRights01/06/21 03:18 AM
0

If the general media changed its phrasing to refer to "men and children", would anybody actually think that the phrasing was equating the intelligence/maturity levels of men and children? I doubt it. In any story involving a diverse group, the odds are pretty good that there are men, women, and children involved. If one provides an overall number, and then provides specific numbers for at two of those categories, the third number is not difficult to figure out. Most journalists get a certain cha…
/r/MensRights18/05/21 09:47 PM
7

Maybe it's an Aussie thing, but I feel like I'm misunderstanding the phrasing - does "men's sheds" literally just refer to a workspace for men only, in general? A workspace for one man, somewhat equivalent to the "she-shed" thing that was big (in the U.S.) a couple years ago? Or something else entirely?
/r/MensRights18/05/21 09:38 PM
1

You are a fantastic partner, and I hope that your gf appreciates that you do what you do. I don't know any woman that would consider that sexist, it's considerate. That 'friend' is very, very wrong.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 08:37 AM
1

Looks should never have anything to do with politics.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 08:34 AM
4

Leave.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 08:32 AM
5

If anyone that I know actually espoused 'kill all men', I'd call them out on it. It's not nearly as prevalent as folks think it is, outside of specific internet places. Like Reddit.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 07:32 AM
1

That comment (in the screenshot) is extremely obviously satirical.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 07:12 AM
3

...what's the actual issue? You didn't specify. Your head is spinning, and she is the maid of honor at a wedding...how do these things correlate?
/r/MensRights16/05/21 07:09 AM
5

Some women hate men. Some men hate women. If you don't fall into either geoup, ignore it and associate with others that also don't fall into either group. The 'kill all men' folks are not the majority, they're just currently the loudest.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 07:07 AM
0

And if the father is dead, or otherwise unable to raise a child? Do you feel the same about single fathers with daughters?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/21 10:44 PM
1

that women should stay out of educating their sons altogether ...how does that work for the sons of single mothers? Mom shouldn't even try?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/21 09:40 PM
1

Does anyone even ask about engagements that didn't result in a marriage? I guess it's not odd, I've just never had anyone ask, nor have I asked...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/21 08:24 PM
5

STEMcels I'm stealing this, it's fantastic 🤣
/r/MensRights01/05/21 12:34 AM
1

Eh, I can't say one way or the other, on FB. I purposely keep my friend list small, and I don't do much on FB aside from scrolling my timeline. Female incels exist. Where you might see evidence of them, is a different kind of question.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 12:06 AM
1

Alternatively, women are shamed for not being celibate, or not being celibate 'enough'. Also, isn't there a sub specifically for female incels? R/femcel, or somethings similar? So the answer, I guess, is that there are female incels.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 11:51 PM
8

If she threatened suicide, leave. You are not responsible for her actions in that regard. Other than that, though, this sounds like it belongs on a red pill sub more than it belongs here.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 11:46 PM
2

Yikes, that does throw a wrench in the works :-(
/r/MensRights30/04/21 11:01 PM
-2

Huh. Not my experience, but okay.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 11:00 PM
2

Why is it that the term 'bossy' is only used to refer to members of the female gender? Seriously. I might actually make a separate post about this. I have, literally, never heard anyone, ever, refer to a penis-owner as 'bossy'. I'm sure that it has probably happened, sometime in the history if the world, I just haven't witnessed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/21 10:53 PM
-6

there are many more safety nets give to women , whichh arent to men Such as? I'm in the U.S., so ymmv, but afaik every safety net that is available to women, is also available to men.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 09:03 PM
9

If he's fairly certain that the kid is his, and he wants to be involved, he needs to start by establishing paternity. Women do, sometimes, become pregnant and pop out babies. This is basic biology. Paternity cannot be legally established without DNA and/or a signature. If coworker thinks that it's his kid, he needs to petition for a DNA test.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 08:30 PM
-1

men have the best jobs in the world Define 'best'. A more meaningful way of looking at privilege is by how much money men and women are legally entitled to spend, not how much they earn. Once married (in the USA, in a community-property state, only situatuon that I'm qualified to comment on) both the husband and the wife are entitled to spend...everything, if they so choose. Wives do not have any more entitlement to their husband's earnings, than do men to their wive's earnings. Of course there'…
/r/MensRights30/04/21 07:24 PM
2

I'm not sure what your point is? Neuro-divergent issues tend to be over-diagnosed in men/boys, and under-diagnosed in girls/women. Anyone that isn't living under a rock knows that ASD (and Asperger's) is a real thing.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 06:52 PM
1

Generalization and/or stereotyping is ridiculous. Anyone that actually thinks about it, knows this.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 06:22 PM
1

I mean....women do work, and your own stated percentages indicate that (at least) 5% of the dead/injured are female. Inclusivity is not wrong - hell, a good chunk of the posts on this sub are angry about the lack of inclusiveness.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 05:11 PM
2

That seems incredibly complicated, incredibly expensive, and (at the very least) confusing for the child as they grow up - and that's assuming that the legality is airtight, which I doubt.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 07:05 PM
2

Fairly certain Avril Lavigne has a song about basically this. I understand rejecting people that rejected you while poor/struggling/whatever. Rejecting people that you didn't even know while you were poor/struggling/whatever seems excessive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/21 05:40 PM
1

Actually, I should take that back - it looks like it's not on the statewide schedule, it just sounded that way when our GP spoke about it. I wanted my son to get it anyway, so it doesn't make a difference for us, but I was very mistaken about it being on the 'required' list, for either gender.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 04:16 PM
2

Not sure off the top of my head, I only know because my son is in 6th grade this year, so he got it with his last batch of boosters
/r/MensRights29/04/21 02:37 PM
1

I like the quote from The Italian Job - 'Trust, but verify'.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 07:10 PM
4

Huh. My state added Gardasil to the standard/required-for-public-school vaccine schedule for boys and girls when they reach 6th grade. I think the guidance has changed a lot since it first came out, I believe they used to think that it wasn't necessary/effective for guys.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 07:04 PM
1

Right? My grandmother and great Aunt would have a lot to say about that. My grandmother has a doctorate and is a former Mensa member, my great aunt is still a Mensa member (I think she also has a doctorate, but I don't recall), and they both were both single mothers back when it was much more difficult. I believe my great Aunt's split was amicable, but my bio grandfather became an alcoholic and left my grandmother (with two kids) to marry a younger woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 06:09 PM
2

'Hot party girls don't really read books' is not a flex, for the girls or for the boys that are interested in them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 11:51 PM
4

The act of making the statement is a manipulation in itself, for/from either gender, no matter the intent. Even if meant in a genuine way, the net effect will likely be to make the partner feel inadequate/insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/21 07:44 PM
0

Not to sound anti-Semitic, because I'm not at all, but the short (and complete) answer is 'Judaism'.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 03:40 AM
1

Jeebus, that's not statutory rape, that's straight-up pedophilic abuse. I'd have a hard time not setting fire to an adult woman that went after my (currently 12yo) son in that fashion. And if the cops didn't arrest her, I probably would actually go after her myself. Wtf.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 01:54 AM
1

Guessing this was posted by the author as a personal plug, but either way, I enjoyed the narrative and the writing style. Essentially describing all wives as soul-sucking, omniscient, killjoys - not so much. But in general, good read. I think we've all felt a bit 'Mr. Cellophane', in our lives.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 01:38 AM
1

This. If it was done only in-house, with the sample verifiably destroyed after results were accepted (I'd say one retest, if either 'parent' disputes results, is reasonable - there's a margin for error in any lab test), maybe. But, as far as I have any say, I don't want my child's DNA unnecessarily ending up in any database, which would be almost certain if paternity testing was mandated.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 11:24 PM
1

From what I see in the screenshot, she didn't want to press charges...
/r/MensRights19/03/21 11:11 PM
2

Mother's Day isn't until May, and Father's Day is in June...at least, in the U.S. So...what's the point of this?
/r/MensRights19/03/21 11:05 PM
1

There's a weird phenomena that I just can't understand, where sexual abuse is apparently separated from physical violence. If I recall correctly, the Chris Brown/Rihanna abuse was recorded on video. Weinstein and Epstein were not, at least not to the same extent. I find all of them repugnant, though, so maybe I'm not the best person on which to use that retort.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/21 10:17 PM
1

Just off the top of my head...Weinstein and Epstein have credible sexual abuse allegations against them. I don't recall Adam Driver or Tyga having similar allegations (although, honestly, I'm a bit out of the loop until something like that really blows up) Ain't no amount of money or power that can cause most women to ignore that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/21 09:19 PM
2

Gawd, I wish lol. I'm one of the ones that takes a bit of effort to get off...so anything that's strictly casual usually doesn't fulfill the orgasmic need, for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/21 09:03 PM
3

I don't disagree...on the occasions that I was thinking of, I had not pretended anything regarding outcome - we both knew that it was a 'limited engagement' type of thing. I'm just one of those women that took some experimentation to know, for sure, that I'm not a fan of casual lol. I also know women that prefer casual, and I'm actually kind of jealous of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/21 08:40 PM
0

Idiots will also generally be classified as 'controversial'. YMMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/21 08:34 PM
17

Men constantly lower their standards for casual sex vs LTR, just saying. Personally, when I was willing to engage in casual sex - the very few times that I engaged in casual sex with a partner that I would not consider for an LTR, I was disappointed in the whole experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/21 08:32 PM
1

I prefer 'partying for the sake of fun', and even when I would go out with an open mind to hook-ups, they weren't the goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/21 07:52 PM
1

'Dating' advice means jack-shit, if you don't have a clear perception about the person asking for it. Less necessary, but still helpful, is knowing anything about a particular person that the requestor would like advice about. This ties into the main issue that I have with responses in PPD stating 'well, this study said X amount of women said X about their dating habits', ad infinitum. Each situation is different.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/21 07:49 PM
1

I didn't get through all the responses, but teally? Everyone is quite literally looking for their best match - be it in looks, income, lifestyle, etc, or any combination that they like. Male and female, doesn't matter. It's bizarre to me that folks act as if it's gender-based.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 01:22 AM
1

I'd agree about the emphasizing rules, etc - but not necessarily that it makes for a 'better' parent. My dad raised me on his own, starting around my 4th birthday. I have an metric fuckton of defiance/control issues arising from his emphasizing of rules. He was a good parent, and a good dad, and I imagine I wouldn't be the determined asshole that I am if I had been raised by my mother - but that doesn't automatically mean that he was the 'better' parent. It just means that he did what all single…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/21 12:37 AM
1

So...men that do take responsibility for their actions, do not want women that do the same (i.e. 'independent' women)? That seems...backwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/21 09:35 PM
1

Agreed. I guess I just don't remember the last time I saw a man being stalked and then murdered, by a cop.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 03:02 AM
-1

Did I not already say that the 6pm curfew idea was bad? Rhetorical question - I did, just maybe not in this specific comment thread, so maybe you don't know my feelings on that subject. I think it's stupid. I also don't believe that the outcry would be the same if the genders were reversed, which is also bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 02:50 AM
-4

A human being was stalked and killed by a human in a profession that is supposed to protect. As far as I know, she was not a Feminazi...and even if she was, that doesn't mean that she deserved what happened. I do not give a flying fuck about genitalia. This human being did not deserve to die.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 02:37 AM
-3

Jeebus. 'Woman is stalked and killed by a police officer' is still a 'feminazi' problem. How about just having some goddamn empathy for the human that was snuffed out by another human that was supposed to 'serve and protect'?
/r/MensRights16/03/21 02:11 AM
6

You want the government that far up in your business?
/r/MensRights16/03/21 01:48 AM
6

I'd say that it also blew up because it looks like she was killed by the police officer that was stalking her. The 6pm curfew is bullshit, though. Especially because it seems that she was murdered by a cop.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 01:32 AM
8

That's horrifying. My initial recation was to say 'tell your parents', but it seems that your mother already knows. If this pedo continues to message you, you do have the option (which I would strongly suggest!) to report to the authorities. Local police may not have much pull, but the FBI specializes in dealing with predators of this type.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 01:29 AM
1

I can make any statement I want, and say that I'm speaking on the behalf of women as a whole. It doesn't make that a true statement. You linked a study from Sweden, and I'm in the USA, so that may make a difference. In dating market, we see that men improving as a whole, and providing women as a whole with better conditions and options, makes women less attracted to them. That's also rather generalized. As is what I quoted in previous comments. Men and Women are not a hive-mind. What promises on…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/21 01:20 AM
2

Despite that long list of promises made by singular women, I don't believe that my comment was 'missing the point'. If women would prefer to 'be alone', that is their choice. If the men who take exception do not like that choice, it's on them to pursue avenues that would change perception. Same way that a woman who 'can't find a man' may want to re-evaluate herself. None of us have a responsibility to be attractive to the opposite sex - unless we want that attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/21 12:30 AM
-5

I must be old, I barely understand what 'alt troll boi' means. I'm not trolling. Maybe it's because I'm 'old', but I've been background-checking folks on the internet for over a decade. The ability to do so, is not gender-reliant. That this particular version of background-checking will include 'allegations', I've already said is rather iffy.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 10:58 PM
-12

Being able to search a person's history is feminist? Naw, boo. That just means that someone knows how to utilize the internet - male or female, for search-er or search-ee.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 10:32 PM
16

The submitting false reports is concerning. The 'reveal your personal info' bit is not especially difficult for someone who knows how to use google.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 10:30 PM
1

Great character...horrible person lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 10:03 PM
2

Instead, women chose no-one. That in itself should suggest that maybe, just maybe, men should take some responsibility for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 10:01 PM
2

This. At 5ft9, I'm taller than avergae for a woman. I don't gaf about the height of the men around me, in general. In dating...it's not a deal-breaker. I do like being shorter than my partner, but only because I like the 'enveloped' feeling when I hug them while standing up. But that's only one aspect - I've dated shorter men, and height has never been an issue in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 09:32 PM
1

The ones that are being 'playful', or just flirting (outside of a work scenario!)? I actually enjoy the banter on occasion, because I don't tend to hold back - and the ones that really don't have an agenda tend to enjoy the banter as well. If they have power in a work scenario, or are actually serious about their advances and don't accept rejection/redirection? Big bad. Scary bad. Especially in the former case.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/21 07:52 PM
-1

Jeebus effing christ, I'm about to nix my 'anony' profile. 'Empowering women' is not automatically misandry.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 01:15 AM
-1

What abuse did she survive?
/r/MensRights11/03/21 11:40 PM
2

Lol I remember that feeling...the 'gimme' classes are the best :-)
/r/MensRights11/03/21 11:33 PM
1

Advisory? What is that? It does sound boring.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:32 PM
1

Pay attention to...English? I know I'm one of those assholes that still recognizes grammatical and spelling errors, and if English is not OP's first language, I will retract that part of my comment. When a post entitled 'I hate fucking school' is riddled with errors, it seems fairly obvious that one may want to pay more attention to the class that teaches that particular subject, misandric or not.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:32 PM
4

If this is an English class, I think you oughta pay more attention in general. If they recognize IWD, they should do the same for IMD, though.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 08:59 PM
0

I mean...the kid has a right to know their genetic lineage, and the presumed father has a right to know if he's raising his own genetic offspring. The 30% thing sounds high, but only anecdotally - I only know two women that have avoided paternity testing. One because she knew who the bio father was, but he was married; the other because her ex demanded testing, just from a rumor, then disappeared. In both cases, the bio father was also the 'presumed' father. I think it mostly comes down to the s…
/r/MensRights09/03/21 11:07 PM
1

Female, 32, and yes it has. The 'why' isn't easily quantifiable, but in my own case - I think it was at least partially due to being kinda 'needy' in the younger years. I was that teenage girl that just wanted attention and adoration from anyone that I found attractive (made much more difficult by being nerdy af). As I got older, I became more discerning and outgrew that mind-set.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 08:57 PM
2

I obviously can only speak for myself, but the only 'attraction' a high notch count has ever provided, for me, was the subliminal thought that notches = skill. Took me a lil while to realize that that was not usually the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/20 08:53 PM
-6

The simple fact that the rest of the office is comprised of women, doesn't necessarily mean that you're being bullied because of your gender. Fuck, I'm gonna get downvoted for that. But the truth is, office/administrative/HR type folks...overall, tend to be bullying, power-hungry assholes, regardless of their gender, and the gender of the people that they're bullying. It fucking sucks. I've seen this, and experienced this, from both genders.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 03:09 AM
3

If your husband has never lost custody (editing to add: due to legal proceedings that declared him unfit), or had run-ins with the law/CPS that would call his parenting ability into question - there shouldn't be any grounds to deny him custody of thr child that is biologically his (the step-children are a different, and more complicated, issue). First advice is that your husband needs to get a lawyer, if at all possible...either retain one, or research low-cost/free legal assistance in your coun…
/r/MensRights29/10/20 07:59 PM
2

Considering how complicated the U.S. tax code is, it wouldn't surprise me if even a basic men vs women study hasn't been done. For example, are you talking about total taxes paid overall? Or net taxes paid after deductions and/or credits? Married couples - which gender would those taxes be counted towards, when filing jointly (especially if both parties are working)? Point being - I think it'd be almost impossible to directly compare the two. Sooo many more examples than the two that I specified…
/r/MensRights29/10/20 07:42 PM
2

There are a few things that I'd disagree with, in this, if I was feeling froggy...but overall, you're not wrong.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 04:09 PM
5

The brother is very obviously in a controlling (if not outright abusive) relationship. It looks like he has no intention of leaving that relationship, though, and the sister has at least reached out and been available, for help and support. Can't help someone leave if they aren't open to the idea, and that's the only way that situation is likely to be resolved.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 06:09 PM
2

Yeah, I more meant that your post wasn't worded very clearly.
/r/MensRights22/10/20 03:40 PM
-6

Women's sports aren't advertised the way that men's leagues are. More fans would equal greater support, which would equal higher pay. But women's sports are treated as a joke. Just look at the WNBA.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 10:52 PM
1

Getting out is the priority - you are in an abusive relationship, no doubt about it. You mentioned that your support system (family and friends) are fairly far away - if you could gather the funds to get to their location, would they help you? I know the hopelessness that you're dealing with - I didn't make moves to escape my own similar situation, because I couldn't see a feasible way out. There's always a way out, though...even if it feels like a setback in the short-term, it'll be good in the…
/r/MensRights20/10/20 07:55 PM
1

Check out some co-ed Roller Derby, at the 'professional' level. I've seen tiny lil 120-ish-lb women take out men twice their size. Physical capability is an important factor, don't get me wrong, but determination and skill can help even that playjng field.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 07:46 PM
1

Uh...whaaa?
/r/MensRights18/10/20 05:58 AM
3

Moving on, if you want something that your current partner doesn't, is the logical move. I find actual logic to be somewhat lacking around here, thus the original inquiry :-)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 10:14 PM
1

Some folks do seem to care, especially around here...if you don't...good! I, personally, don't think it matters and don't ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 10:12 PM
1

If she hasn't, then this isn't really directed at you...the question did not include virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 10:11 PM
10

See, this seems like the logical answer, to me - past is past. As long as both current parties are happy and satisfied, who cares what happened before? Thus why I asked, because I see a whole bunch of posts/comments around here from folks that really do care and are actuallu offended by their partner's past.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/20 08:47 PM
5

First, who? Second, 'Sidious'. If you're going to reference people/characters, at least get their names right.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 10:04 PM
6

I'll caveat my vote: It is true. That's a very good description of the reality for abuse survivors. My caveat is that they shouldn't have only used male = abuser, female = victim pronouns. Emotional abuse, especially, is prevalent coming from either gender, and just as heinous for their victim.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 01:38 AM
38

It's all sexism. Also, the dude that hypothetically knocked up a WNBA player would be much more S.O.L.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 01:30 AM
1

This is overwhelmingly true, and sexist in both directions. Without flexibility for paid parental leave for both parents (by which I mean something involving a guaranteed timeframe for both parents, and a certain total amount required to be taken by each), everyone suffers. Especially with a lack/shortage of guaranteed paid leave for either parent, and the insane cost of <1yo childcare. I'm in America, though, so I'm speaking solely from that perspective.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 01:29 AM
6

I'd be curious to overlay another map, with religious statistics for each of those regions. Much like an awful lot of other social mores, it's clung to out of faith/belief/tradition/religion (take your pick, the end result is similar enough). It's not right, it's not fair, and it should be regulated or stopped entirely - but the fact that MGM and FGM are treated differently in many places where either one is even an option, I think, has less to do with gender and much more to do with the parents…
/r/MensRights20/07/20 01:11 AM
1

I 100% agree with your view, the one in bold at the end of your post. It's an awful 'game' of survival, not much different from the sociological game of 'Lifeboat' played by/indoctrinated to children, historically; but it makes sense. When it comes down to it, in those situations, not everyone gets to live.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 01:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter