TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throwinout Archive

View 16 posts and 3,750 comments by throwinout on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
977

throwinout/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/16 10:19 PM
210

throwinout/r/PussyPass02/08/15 05:42 PM
19

Discussionthrowinout/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 04:53 AM
19

Question For Women (but men too)throwinout/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/18 08:16 AM
13

Discussionthrowinout/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 02:19 AM
13

Newsthrowinout/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/16 10:34 PM
6

Question For Menthrowinout/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 05:37 AM
5

"Science"throwinout/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/15 03:52 PM
5

Discussionthrowinout/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 12:34 AM
4

Question For Red Pillthrowinout/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 05:39 AM
4

Q4Allthrowinout/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 05:20 AM
4

Discussionthrowinout/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/16 03:04 AM
0

Discussionthrowinout/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/16 03:54 AM
0

Question for allthrowinout/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 03:10 AM
0

Question For Menthrowinout/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 04:58 AM
0

Question for both pillsthrowinout/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 04:01 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,750 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Well? Don’t leave us hanging. Did you like his penis or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 06:00 AM
4

Ask women what they see as examples of the "audacity of men" and just do that. The issue is of course it is a bullshit term and most of it is stuff that they just don't like rather than anything actually meaningful.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 03:38 AM
1

I read somewhere doctors don't want to prescribe it because they are afraid of malpractice suits since taking steroids does have risks. So the path of least resistance is to just let men suffer with low T instead of taking the risk that could result in bad results. Insurance also has a bad effect like they always do, but T is relatively cheap from what I hear, so I can't remember exactly what it was. /r/testosterone probably knows more. Just another reason the hate the American healthcare system…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 03:36 AM
8

The insolence of women to bitch about the audacity of men. I do make an extra effort to be audacious towards women who say that though, fuck em.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 03:33 AM
7

Women, especially the feminist adjacent type, find a word and bastardize it frequently to either attack men or victimize themselves. "Rape culture", "incel", "gaslight", "narcissist", etc. I see these words frequently being used in an exaggerated manner and not in the true way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 03:29 AM
2

Blue collar men came out ahead? I thought it was white collar people due to WFH and massive tech/stock gains. So who got hosed? I know healthcare workers did (except for travel people). If people tell me female workers I might need a change of pants.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 03:23 AM
1

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 12:14 AM
1

Increase weighting for race and decrease weighting for bf% or LBM. Not sure how you figured height into it but that is major.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 11:52 PM
1

FDS-lite in the way they spoke about men and general viewpoints. Like I said, there was crossover, it is hardly like they ever just stayed contained and strictly on topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 11:48 PM
1

It was not "academic" lmao. I remember it. It was just FDS-lite. Some of those girls even came over here, that's how I first heard of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 11:21 PM
1

Gendercritical, Pinkpillfeminism, FDS, there was a great amount of overlap in users.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:55 PM
2

Well the sub is gone now so I can't actually show you can I? But stuff like brown guys are mostly unattractive, are inferior to white guys and that is why the societies they build are "worse", women shouldn't bother with brown guys, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:18 PM
0

You missed the word "history". It is not about me or today.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:15 PM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxiVYEjp0Ww
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 10:09 PM
10

Pleeeeeeenty of women are racist, so that just aligns with their own viewpoint. Being a feminist doesn't stop you from being racist. In fact, the racism within that circle is what initially stopped desire to support them. They also just don't view those guys as creepy since they think they are hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 09:34 PM
5

They also used to say really racist stuff about brown guys, but I think the policy also looks the other way when women do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 09:25 PM
1

After some interactions with women here, I echo that old Hebrew prayer "Thank you God for not making me a woman". A lot of the women here are simply awful and almost singlehandedly justify why God in his infinite wisdom (or nature through evolution) gave men dominion over women for most of human history. Many of the "terrible things" that women say happened to them personally, I suspect are conveniently told to leave out the reciprocal terrible things they also did. Or was karma for how awful th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 09:23 PM
1

Football and biking clothes are not as tight as the shorts I am talking about. These are the kinds of shorts I am talking about. Fine, I should have said "looser", but I didn't expect a grammar nazi to come after me on one letter being so pedantic. It is obvious what I meant. And when men wear compression leggings to the gym, they usually wear looseR shorts over them. They do not just wear leggings alone like women do. That's the point. That's how the paragraph break was used. She went from one …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 05:57 PM
1

Dude, I'm saying the shorts she wears go up her asscrack. I'm not describing anyone's asscrack, that is just something you are weirdly hyperfocusing on. I'm saying the type of shorts that are worn are the kind that give wedgies. I'm not going out looking for her asscrack. But if I look forward, when sitting, and she's in front of me, I will of course see her lower body and see how her shorts look. If it is a guy, I will see a guy's shorts. I'm not staring at her asscrack. You are just acting his…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 03:04 PM
1

I go to the gym 4-5 days a week for 1-3 hours the same time every day. Lots of people go on the same schedule, she happens to be one. That is a lot of time. I don't go out of my way to look at her. Sometimes she is in my line of view. Sometimes I am working out and she goes in front of me, or asks me to use the equipment after I am done (and she sounded older too). I am not going out of my way to look at her. Or any specific part of her body. But if I look forward I see her entire body and I see…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 02:50 PM
1

Dude, don’t lie. These are your words quoted directly: Wrong, look at the order of the paragraphs, I was talking about two things. If I was talking about swimming for loose clothing over, I would have made it part of that paragraph instead of a one sentence paragraph by itself. And context tells you of course it was referring to biking and football, because that's where you wear compression leggings under normal clothes. You just made a mistake and now want to double down. And your denial here m…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 02:38 PM
1

Wrong, k
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 02:29 PM
1

I never checked her out ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 02:27 PM
1

Lol no they don’t. Not for a swim meet, which is the term for a competition. You have obviously never been to a meet, competed, or watched the Olympics or any other swimming sporting event. Men wear tight shorts to reduce drag in the water, the same way women wear tight suits to reduce drag in the water. Baggy pants increase drag and increase swim times in a sport where fractions of a second matter. OMFG, I was talking about the compression shorts and leggings about the bikers and football playe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 07:26 AM
1

You definitely could. I understand perfectly fine, I just don't think you are right. Good try with the condescending insult, typical. You're really not coming off as intelligent as you think you are. Seriously, how big is your ego that you think someone telling you you are wrong just doesn't understand you? Because there couldn't be any other explanation, right? Go. Type. In. What. I. Said. And. You. Will. See. You. Are. Incorrect. Most people dress as I have said. There are of course a minority…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 07:19 AM
1

First of all, you could type less and read more, therefore you would see I'm not "much older" and am mid-20s. Honestly, type in "boys swim meet" in Google images and you will see the vast majority are not wearing speedos. Your thing is out of the ordinary. This is how most boys dress at swim meets. This is how the best swimmers in the world swim. I don’t see women wearing less than or equal to just a speedo at the gym. So that was an exaggeration made to make women look bad. I don’t know why it …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 06:14 AM
1

Good lord you write so much. It was very repetitive and you could be more succinct. While I get that "people should be able to wear anything" or whatever, I'm just saying this is one reason older men act the way they do. I'm not saying it is a good thing or something I do. I don't know what swim meets you go to, but speedos aren't usually a thing. We wore trunks and shorts. Even if you type "boys swim meet" in Google it is mostly shorts and trunks, not speedos. Way more conservative than what gi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 05:33 AM
0

I know I'm going to get women jumping down my throat for this, and I'm a mid-20s man myself, but girls these days are dressing way older than they are. For example, there is this girl at my gym who for the longest time I thought was in her 20s, turns out she's 16 (I never hit on her or even thought about it, I heard her talking about it once). She dresses in those tight ass leggings/booty shorts that show off her entire buttcheeks right up through the asscrack. I think I read somewhere that girl…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 03:39 AM
4

Some women are too dumb to see it. The ones who aren't want it that way. Women don't really want sexism to end, what they want is benevolent sexism for themselves. Whether men experience sexism or not is irrelevant to them. But Western men are to blame here too. They pushed this because they expected women to be rational and good faith actors, they aren't. I'm glad to hear some men are beginning to wake up and see that it does more harm than good, but it still isn't enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/22 02:07 AM
1

The Shop Around the Corner and You’ve Got Mail. Mail/Internet romance before Tinder, so quaint. Third is Edward Scissorhands.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 09:07 PM
1

Yeah. I hope youre also throwing in the punishments for women who do end up assaulting too though. Not like currently where women just get a slap on the wrist. Sure some women will get away with it like some men do, but if female assaulters get treated like male ones in your scenario, not really a hard choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/22 08:12 PM
1

No, it is not a fact, it is an empty threat and an opinion. You have no idea if the tax burden will fall on me. For all you know, the tax burden will be shifted even more from the top earners to the lower demographics. But none of that your garbage matters since I don't care about the taxes, I've already made peace with getting taxes a lot and most of that being wasted anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 04:56 AM
1

Bruh that was obviously a shitpost, you're taking this way too seriously, touch grass No, abortions will still happen. And I don't really give a fuck about taxes, I already get taxed up the ass due to my bracket and rely on finding tax breaks as it is. So more empty threats. First it was "ooga booga no sex for you" now it is "ooga booga more taxes" that we are fucking gonna get in the future anyway. Not to mention the consequences will be after I die anyway. Even in a few decades most of my inco…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 04:43 AM
1

So?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 04:32 AM
1

How does that quote mean I think women weren't having premarital sex, I said as much as today. All it means is that the statistics were influenced that way because women were getting married earlier. Someone else posted stats actually and yes the stats did change from the time period the other girl was talking about and most people getting abortions today are not married mothers, so my point was proven elsewhere if you look around on the rest of the thread. Ok, so what? My point is IDGAF if they…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 04:24 AM
1

When did I say that? I don't think you got my point at all. You're arguing against yourself here. My point was very simply that she is using empty threats for her argument and none of them make any sense when you think about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 04:19 AM
1

Society has changed too much to compare to hundreds of years ago. And quite frankly, I don't care. My point was she was trying to use the mothers thing as an emotional appeal and it doesn't apply. My point still stands, idgaf if some lady in 1735 was getting an abortion after yelling at her slave. I literally never said these are new things.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 04:14 AM
1

ok
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 04:03 AM
1

Good for the bear
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 04:00 AM
1

I'm just giving my interpretation of them, no one's forcing you to respond
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 03:59 AM
1

I don't know if I consider that committed, maybe just a transient relationship (or a parade of "boyfriends"), that has been my impression. And the never married/cohabitating group is just growing, I'm sure that will be the majority soon (probably already is).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 03:56 AM
1

That's a far cry from assuming they are married dutiful mothers. My impression is that it is a bunch of irresponsible single moms these days. And they can go get punished and have unsafe abortions, IDGAF. Maybe those kids from the first birth would be better off with family members, foster system, orphanage, or whatever instead of being raised by her. If they don't want the punishment maybe they can spend more time raising their kids and less time sleeping around
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 03:45 AM
1

Thats up to the husband. But if they arent able to use modern contraception, then i suppose so. Maybe it is punishment for fucking around with Chad and then settling with Billy beta LMFAO. If thats supposed to be your gotcha, it is a poor one cuz even those husbands dont seem too concerned. You want to use the threat of deadbedrooms, but that is already a thing. Like I said, empty threat. It is mostly the women i see being histrionic. So if those husbands dont give a fuck, why should I? But i ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 03:18 AM
2

Source please, so unmarried single moms? Not too concerned about them tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 03:13 AM
3

Like I said, im not convinced thats what would happen. It is just a distractor and emotional appeal like “no sex for you” is. Contraception has also evolved since that time. Are married mothers still the ones having the most abortions?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 03:11 AM
3

First of all, Id like to see the source for that stat because Im sure theres more context than that. I bet it was because women got married earlier and didnt have sex before marriage as much. Women have changed since then, so i doubt abortion being illegal tomorrow would mean the stat would stay the same. Women also used to have more kids then. What are the abortion rates today? Thats what matters If it is seen as a punishment, then it should actually be one
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 03:07 AM
1

Fine with me
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 03:01 AM
3

Ok? Then women sure are histrionic over a given. But i guess it isnt surprising for women to get histrionic over nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 03:00 AM
2

Well it isnt about Chad, he almost always escapes consequences. It is about the harem girls. Too bad for Billy, but theres a reason everyone knows being him sucks, so that hasnt changed. From what Ive been hearing, Billy is starting to give up anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 02:56 AM
3

Even if I did, dont kink shame me old man!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 02:54 AM
3

I still dont see why I should give a shit. Still an empty threat
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 02:40 AM
3

Sexlessness in relationships or outside of them isnt related to abortion legalization. Since Roe v Wade the sexlessness rate has only increased. Countries without legal abortion still have sex. It is just a scare tactic “ooga booga give us what we want or no sex for you”. Call the bluff, lets see what happens. If youre right maybe then at least we’ll lower the rate of sluts running around
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 02:34 AM
2

One isnt related to the other
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 02:29 AM
2

Good.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 02:25 AM
3

Exactly, I know abortion will not actually disappear - it will just be seen as a punishment and guide behavior more. And there will actually be some consequences now for being Chads harem girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 02:20 AM
3

🍑
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 10:54 PM
1

It is only a matter of time before they start wearing howear to gramma’s funeral, so ya better get ready
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 10:54 PM
1

Howear is the only reason i need feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 10:51 PM
12

Girls at the gym now predominantly wearing those shorts that go in between their buttcheeks so you can see the entirety of their posterior. I have seen no less than 3 girls digging in their butts and near their underbun due to these shorts this hour. Im so glad they dress so comfortably. I wonder why women have such a hard time admitting that they dress slutty even if it is uncomfortable in the gym for attention. In think it is because they hate admitting men are right about some stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 10:31 PM
2

That's true, women are really forgetful.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 05:18 AM
0

Wonder if we can create an artificial version of this for women I think those things with teeth that you put in vaginas are the closest we got. Maybe that should be part of what women put up their vaginas like tampons and IUDs.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 04:30 AM
4

Let's ask the women though. Q4W, would you give birth through your dick to not have to deal with rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 04:28 AM
2

Do you know what they are?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 04:14 AM
3

Isn't it weird how evolution didn't take care of rape. Like how men ended up being the ones who get erect and penetrate. Imagine the reverse, where sex was where men got penetrated (and the sperm like diffused into the femdick or was sucked into it) or women had to get their penis receptacle erect before sex could take place. It would like eliminate rape and be more concordant with women's supposed role of being the sexual selectors. Even if men were still stronger. I guess stronger men could st…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 04:03 AM
1

Yeah yeah, whenever someone points out women do something wrong somebody has to point out men do it to. Inevitably, it all goes back to men doing something wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 03:46 AM
7

Women here just make up whatever so it fits the current argument they are having. Sometimes women are having a bunch of casual sex so expecting to find a low n count woman is a fantasy and women are so liberated, sometimes women don't have casual sex because blahblahblah. They'll just say whatever in order to dismiss points being made.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 03:32 AM
1

I feel like the last guy running train on this thread
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 02:56 AM
2

People of German ancestry are the largest group in the US, and the US has the largest amount of Germanic people outside of Germany. Coincidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 01:10 AM
8

Damn, Germans just can't but help feel superior to other people huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 12:10 AM
8

And of course the women are all catches, despite struggling. It is the fault of men for not realizing what great women they are!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 11:09 PM
2

TRP is about sexual strategy. This sub is curated by the mods. They frequently remove posts, so using the posts remaining as the general mindset of the sub is stupid. Because, as I said, those are the ones that get engagement and controversy No, that is subjective. You are not the arbiter on what is meaningful or whether that occurs. You are trying to present your opinion as fact
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 09:15 PM
1

First of all, that is curated by the mods. This is supposed to be about TRP debate so they focus on that. They routinely remove threads because they are “off topic”. Next, it is also selection bias because the more inflammatory ones get more debate and engagement. The other ones are mostly ignored or agreed upon so no further debate is needed. There are frequent posts on things that are actually controversial, so if the majority of posts are what you say, then those are the controversial viewpoi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 09:08 PM
3

If this is how you talk about men, it was your personality that repelled men as much as your looks. If this is really how you treat men, then they didnt mistreat you, they treated you how you should have been according to the golden rule
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 09:02 PM
1

That is not the collective narrative of the men of this sub, that is your mistaken impression. Women here just hear what they want to hear.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 08:48 PM
12

Women are less likely to be satisfied with what they have, even if it is great. Men are more able to bear shitty situations and face adversity.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 04:57 PM
1

That's an arbitrary line. Then some men don't have the same amount of certain hormones. It isn't like women don't produce testosterone at all - they just produce less. The vast majority of men can't either. An athlete will absolutely trounce most men. By your logic, every competition is winning by default - like the term itself has no meaning by that usage. Organization mostly. But Africans also took Europeans as slaves once, at the Barbary coast. So it isn't really the same. It could have gone …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 04:28 PM
1

Let's round up to 50. I agree that is an advantage, but I was talking from a genetic standpoint. There has to be a biological mother and father. Sure. But that is just a proxy for the real thing which just ultimately boils down to strength. In general women are more towards the middle, while men are at the ends. There's more stupid men than stupid women too. Because they were relying on male strength for that power. Are you saying at the time of Queen Elizabeth I, women were not in an inferior p…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 04:20 PM
1

So you say he also beat out men by default? Because some men weren't built with his height or strength? Then what isn't won by default? Every Olympics is people winning by default because that group of people was born with advantages others were not. It just makes a bastardization of the term. Women can use strength though, there's just less. In a discussion of strength, men are at a 10 and women are at a 5, right? In a discussion of pregnancy, women are at a 10 and men are at a N/A - because me…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 04:10 PM
1

I thought the conversation was about overall. Men aren't only stronger than women, they are faster, bigger, etc. I'd even make a point that not having to be the parent that gets pregnant contributed to male superiority historically. Like in a discussion about strength superiority we know stronger means better. But why would you take it for granted that being the pregnant parent is superior? That actually doesn't make sense to me. With two pregnant parents, I'd rather be the one who still contrib…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 03:52 PM
1

That isn't winning by default. Lebron James's body is just built way better than most men's for playing basketball. Did he win by default? That doesn't make sense. Other people are competitors. Technically other women are competitors, but they're even worse so they aren't even a thought. In this context, there is only one competitor - women who can give birth. I'm not, it is a very simple concept. You just don't like that it puts a hole in your argument. I'm not dismissing it, I say women won it…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 03:42 PM
1

Like I said, I don't really care if women are considered better at birth because that is what kept women weak for most of human history. And I didn't go through the whole thread, just found the sentence you only partially quoted. I was just pointing out, that sentence itself wasn't incorrect. I don't know what that argument was, but perhaps he was saying that women need men to impregnate them so men contribute to women going through pregnancy. While men don't really need women to be strong or fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 03:30 PM
1

So it still happens. Women in general no, but the only people who can give birth are women - so the winners are by default women. That's what "winning by default" means, I think you are just unclear on the term.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 03:27 PM
2

It is so odd how the sexes have evolved to be so discordant to each other this way. I'm not saying it is impossible to be happy, but it is like we are built to not be happy with the other gender and it is more likely to be unhappy than happy. Each gender, following their own prerogative, makes the other unhappy most of the time instead of naturally making both happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 02:21 AM
1

There are some women built like men and some men built like women when it comes to the pelvic area. Men with wide pelvises are still men. Women who weightlift and outlift let's say 50% of men are still women who can give birth. None of that matters in the discussion of whether women won giving birth by default. The whole argument is very abstract and ridiculous, but the other person trying to put it out of context also didn't make sense. I personally don't even care if women are "better" at givi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 02:03 AM
2

Right, so what's your point? There are women who are stronger than some men, it isn't winning by default. Women just lose more often than not. Women giving birth is winning by default. Who cares if it is earned or not? Lebron James didn't "earn" being 6'9''. If Lebron James was 5'9'', he would not be the best basketball player in the world. It doesn't matter, that's just the way it is. But it would be stupid to say that Lebron James isn't better at b-ball than some random 5'9'' guy even though h…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 01:46 AM
1

That isn't winning by default though. Women can run and lift, she just can't do it as well as men. Some women are better than other women at lifting, some are even better at it than a minority of men. There's no winning by default there. People would say a 6'5'' man is better than a 5'5'' man at basketball, but the latter can still compete. The former didn't win by default, he had a massive advantage, but it isn't winning by default. Women don't just have a massive advantage, they are the only o…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 01:36 AM
3

You aren't better than men at pregnancy, you are the gender that gets pregnant. That's the full context of the sentence from the other guy. Which is true though, women win that by default. It would be like saying dark skinned people are better at being darker skinned than lighter skinned people. They win by default, it doesn't mean they are actually better at it. I'm putting things in his mouth here, but what I think he is saying is that if men could get pregnant too, we would be better at it. L…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 01:13 AM
1

That looks so gross to me, like their poop is smeared and they don't know how to wipe properly. I know it is just a skin thing, but the ick is still there.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:02 PM
0

Good for him
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 04:20 AM
1

Oogabooga snoosnoo
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 09:56 PM
0

the angry purple haired man-hating feminist decides to abruptly end all the work their predecessors put into continuing their gene line. All because of "muh cost of living" "muh patriarchy" "muh climate change". These are exactly the kind of people who should be ending their mistake of a gene line. The problem is I don't really see it happening that often, they still procreate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 09:50 PM
3

Face. A nice butt is great but it doesn't necessarily have to be "fat". Idk sometimes it feels like guys who are obsessed with fat butts are just a bit more... primitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 09:48 PM
5

She's a single mom nearing 40. She's not the catch she thinks she is. Of course she's seeing people she dates getting into relationships with other people, anyone who commits to her is a chump.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 08:37 PM
2

I'm one for the macabre, I browse /r/morbidreality and that one sub WPD before it was banned (there are some alternates now though). But this story I read today really made me feel bad in a way that I haven't felt in a long time: https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/news/crime_police/article_734b6cb6-a47c-11ec-9d13-8763292dd593.html. Careful reading it, it involves the death of a child. Just thinking about that poor kid crying til he succumbed makes me sick.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 04:50 AM
1

damn that hurted
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 07:46 PM
1

idk I think she's just let online dating go to her head like a lot of women these days I've been ruminating over getting with her again just to preemptively ghost her first this time
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 06:20 AM
1

Dated for 2 months -> ended things over text, said not in a place to date (obvious BS), but lets talk again in a couple of months -> matched on Hinge 2 months later (account said "just joined") and go out again -> blames "COVID surge" for second time ending things, said lets go out again when things get better (obvious BS) -> text her -> ghosted for a month -> she texts me back Obviously not LTR material, but I already have 2 girls in the rotation and have been considering re-adding this third, …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 05:58 AM
4

If a girl takes a month to respond but ends up seeing you again, does that mean she ghosted you or does ghosting mean it has to be permanent?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 05:38 AM
1

Peru if you're not hoity toity
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 04:59 AM
–

Did anyone watch the antiwork Fox news "hitjob" lmao: https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/sd39qe/reddit_mod_gets_laughed_at_on_fox_news/ Apparently the mods thought he was their best representative. Mods r gay confirmed. Some of the users were cool, and the posts were good often, mods ruining things as usual.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/22 11:09 PM
3

Because you can easily get sex, so you don't need to do stuff like that in order to get sex. It is like this Seinfeld routine. This was from decades ago from a goofy Jewish guy, you should be able to figure it out too. It is hard for us to get sex, so we have to resort to this stupid stuff. Having said that, this dude is obv kind of loser. He planned to ask you out in the car. That is kind of pressuring you, because you are stuck in a car with him and far away from home. If he chickened out too,…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 06:10 AM
1

Is she or he Indian?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 04:42 AM
3

So no change. Exactly what I thought. There's women here who say stuff like "if men didn't slut shame women, then incels would be getting laid". Feminism is just one big bait and switch.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 01:15 AM
3

I just looked it up. It was some girl giving her grief over their "age gap". That's what a lot of women like doing here. Concern trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 12:53 AM
3

Can Scandinavian men speak up? Apparently the men there are super hot, relatively rich, and feminist af too. So does what women say, that men would get what they want if they were hot and feminist, hold true? Are you guys happy and essentially won the gender relations game? Are the struggles mentioned here not a thing there?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 11:44 PM
2

She doesn't understand analogies or metaphors. She thinks men are literally saying we are like starving people by not having sex. Foreigner...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 09:23 PM
1

Doesn't matter, same concept. And you aren't victimizing yourself LMAO? I'm just pointing out the logical fallacy in your thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 09:18 PM
2

Anyone can do anything, but if you complain about having to eat fast food instead of a gourmet meal in front of a starving African, you're the asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 09:15 PM
5

Yes, but you're only one woman. Most women are not like that, if they were, the problem wouldn't be a problem. I've dated women too, but they are in the minority. There's nothing wrong with my jaw, nose, or brow though. I've given the reasons women have said I was unattractive, and those aren't fixable... You're right, if women said the issue was a big nose I could have just gotten a rhinoplasty and be done with it. But that isn't what happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 07:56 PM
7

One of the biggest things regarding male attractiveness is height. There just isn't good surgery for that. You get 3 inches, which isn't enough. It is very painful and takes you out of commission for a while and is expensive (not covered), so you have to be independently wealthy or willing to sacrifice career advancement. There are also downsides too. It makes your legs weaker, running is impaired. I would imagine leg weight exercises would be incredibly diminished as well. You also come out dis…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 07:44 PM
3

LOL, oh well, sucks for her. Should have been taken out of the gene pool tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 05:24 PM
4

Possibly, probably goes on a case by case basis though. Many women also don't respond very positively when they see a guy that is deviating from "what a man should be". So if a man is on the higher end of emotional, it is likely that a woman can't/won't cope and that just exacerbates the issue. So it isn't "in their heads", but possibly as a result of them deviating from "what men should be" and the women not being tolerant of that. It is probably multifactorial rather than just one specific thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 05:10 PM
3

That's selection bias though. When talking about averages, of course there's going to be more emotional men than the average man - that's how averages work. Saying women are more emotional on average doesn't mean that emotional men do not exist at all, just at lower rates. And they may self-select and congregate in certain areas. They may also "show" their emotions more readily, like in an atypical environment with worse women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 05:00 PM
5

Perhaps, could be selection bias. But like I said, men may also present different to women here because the women are also atypical.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 04:55 PM
5

Because this is an atypical environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 04:50 PM
6

Like I said, men don't act the same way IRL as they do here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 04:46 PM
9

The way women act here is also a confounding factor. The women here are just weirder, cuntier, and overall less pleasant. Of course a portion of men would act more emotionally here than in a normal environment. In a more typical environment, women are more emotional than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 04:43 PM
5

You know how the West is so powerful that the only thing that can bring it down is Mother Nature or the West itself? Right now I'm not sure if the former or latter will win the race.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 06:56 AM
4

I'd be okay with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 06:54 AM
1

She actually said "realizing you are in the same league as all the other queens". It is a good example of how women overestimate themselves. If she really did match with Caleb, she thinks simply matching with him places her in the same league as better looking women that matched with him - regardless of whether he treated her worse or not. She literally thinks she is in a higher league because a guy swiped on her and swiped on hotter girls as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 06:17 AM
1

That is your perception, and not the truth. I would say the issue is you being too sensitive and emotional and focusing too much on "tone" rather than content. Keep in mind, you were the one hyperfocused on it. I talk like I usually do on this sub, and you're the first to complain about my "tone". Listen. I got it from the same place the woman who was speaking for all men did. Find the stats she was using, and then double it for me. So, where does that point get you? The point is that statement …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 05:32 AM
1

You're just being too sensitive, not my problem. If I am speaking in a flippant manner, it is because I find your posts to be unnecessarily obtuse. And it is "unnecessarily combative". It is 90% of the men referred to by the woman saying "men are worried about..." who is apparently speaking for all men. Why don't you get anal with her? I have the same number of stats that support my assertion that support what the person I responded to said, how does that sound? You're simply being pedantic and …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 05:14 AM
1

I'm not, you just perceived it as such, nothing I said was combative. You asked a question, I answered. If you don't like the answer, you can calm your tits. I don't interact with the same exact men every single day. Most men's experiences aren't radically different when it comes to this. You can extrapolate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 05:03 AM
1

By going outside. How would you know, you're not a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 04:58 AM
1

Her teeth are fucked too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 03:52 AM
1

This girl is saying she was one of the girls. If he really did stoop so low, I will join the Caleb-burning mob. That girl is straight up gross. I wouldn't have touched her even in my incel days. But my spidey senses tell me she is just trying to jump on the bandwagon and never even got a match with Caleb and is doing this for her "podcast" clout.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 03:42 AM
3

"CMV" post, but the top 3 or 4 posts are all by women circlejerking the OP. Classic female CMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 03:26 AM
7

No, the women on here are shittier than average. Being behind a computer screen and anonymity also contributes to the audacity. You know most of these women would be too scared to talk to men that way IRL. And that's just the skinny STEM nerd type. I'd love to see them try to talk about gender issues with Tyrone or Jose the way they talk online. Many of them speak as if they are living in constant fear and paranoia.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 12:03 AM
2

No, you did not. You linked to a page to describe a book. Show me the actual words or the actual study. If the book does in fact have a study, it should be easy to find online. You do not need a penis to get BV. It can be caused by oral sex or even sex toys. For all you know, douching (which by the way invalidates your penis claim by itself) caused the BV and then the lesbians "passed it to each other". So why do lesbians have a higher rate than straight women who are actively having sex with me…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 07:09 AM
1

So? I said I wish vaginas were more effective at cleaning
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 06:54 AM
1

That's not what they did. And there's others saying the same thing without "defining virgins as literally anything". You're just being obtuse now. It is actually fascinating how some women just can't admit to being wrong. I notice you conveniently ignore things like getting BV from oral, or lesbians having a higher rate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 06:50 AM
2

Notable that it wasn't like the girls were all the same (aside from basic bitch personality) so it being a case of like attracting like. Asian girl, short chubby girl, tall skinny girl, big nosed Dobby looking girl, etc - they're all after the same guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 06:46 AM
1

That's why I can't bring myself to feel sorry for him
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 06:40 AM
1

I wish it could self clean some girl's chlamydia away
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 06:38 AM
1

Clean your vagene
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 06:21 AM
2

So? How does that invalidate the point? I love how you left out the very next sentence which clearly contradicted your point: So the short answer is yes, you can be a virgin and still develop BV. The point is, you can get BV from oral or be a lesbian (higher rate actually) and never touch a dick and still get BV. You can be a 13 year old virgin who douches and get one. Ok, show so me the actual study and words - I'm not going to buy a book and read it when you've been easily proven wrong. It is …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 06:16 AM
1

Hope not.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 06:10 AM
1

Yes, you do - BV can happen due to douching or congenitally due to a lack of lactobacilli. I suppose a virgin who proactively got an IUD could get it too. Sex toys can transfer bacteria too if you do anal and vaginal with the same one. No penis needed. The rest of my comment stands too. Must have missed the oral and lesbian part. You just have to type in virgin BV to see you are wrong: https://youngwomenshealth.org/2021/07/16/virgin-bv-yeast-infection/
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 06:08 AM
1

That's why you'll never catch me letting a penis go inside of me. But there are women out there who can't get enough of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 05:47 AM
0

No, it is with vaginas. Bacterial vaginosis can happen without a dick going in too. BV risk is increased with new and multiple partners. It isn't the same "dirty" dick that is causing the problem. One dick can lead to BV in one woman, and do nothing to another woman. Meanwhile one woman can keep getting it. And if she gets it from one dick, if she keeps fucking it, she most likely won't keep getting it from the same guy. Oral sex can also increase BV. Women who have sex with women actually have …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 05:46 AM
3

It is kind of funny how nasty vaginas are considering how good they can feel. I found out a lot of girls have an increased risk of bacterial vaginosis with new partners. So you ho lovers better watch out.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 05:10 AM
3

The thing that you should be "generous" with is yourself and time. If you really want to show monetary generosity, it should be to someone who actually needs help - unless you make a habit of dating bum women. I don't go to school, have my job, or my car for women. That is for myself. Women just see it. I've outcompeted other men in life, not just dating. I pay for outings with friends too, especially since my friendships run the gamut of SE classes. But that is because there is already a relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 04:34 AM
4

BUT there were still PLENTY of women who very willingly threw themselves at him in order to (successfully) advance their careers. Just because he's a rapist dickhead doesn't mean every women he was involved with was a victim. This. Sometimes women think that a rapist raped every woman he ever slept with. Frankly, some women ARE attracted to rapists (without knowing he is a rapist of course), and plenty of women have consensual sex with men like that. Of course, of that group of women, many will …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 03:11 AM
41

My mom is on the phone talking to some other woman I feel like 50-75% of waking hours. Like every time I visit her, she's on the phone talking to her sisters or friends. I mean I hope she isn't lonely, but that woman be talking. She also has her religious community. This must be about women without a community.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 02:48 AM
5

Those girls are usually the narcissists themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 02:38 AM
3

As a dude who would never split a check, here’s how I see it. Women have options, many more options than most men. I am competing with other men. By paying, I’m showing I’m at least financially stable enough to afford dinner and have some level of generosity. LOL, I've LTRed and had STRs with women I've never had to pay for. Feels good. If you have to impress women with your money or "outcompete" other men with money, you're a chump. Of course, no woman has ever had to wonder whether I actually …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 02:20 AM
2

And the people doing the accusing? Women like Ann Putnam and Mary Warren. Men did the actual physical work, sure, because that is how things are even now. But make no mistake about it, there were plenty of women (maybe even the majority) who wanted the witches dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 02:08 AM
3

Anxiety over what? The current downturn in the market?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 12:28 AM
1

I thought when you said "all of that other stuff" you were generalizing and talking about stuff outside of porn. If not, then we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 05:30 AM
1

When it comes to viewing things on a screen, sure. Doesn't hold true for a lot of other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 05:11 AM
0

"But none are a dealbreaker". But dating is chock full of paradoxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 12:12 AM
1

In terms of preference for me on what she watches: lesbian porn > gay men porn > solo porn (male or female) > straight porn Her watching lesbian porn is specifically a turn on, the rest are neutral. Unless her watching straight porn suggests a cuckqueen fetish, then it moves up to turn on. But none are a dealbreaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 06:16 PM
1

You must be confused. Where did I make that accusation? The men here are no more shitty than most of the women, and most women in general are not as shitty as the women here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 06:02 PM
0

It isn't just RP men though, they think that about most men in the world. Even when RP men talk about men in general, that is the response. Good men are apparently exceedingly rare. This becomes very apparent when talking about "the patriarchy" or why the sexual "market" is the way it is. It is just a cop out to pretend they are only talking about RP men. Most women here haven't even met a RP man in real life. I also think you underplay how understandable it is why RP men act the way they do, be…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 03:56 PM
1

When did I neg? You negged far more than I have (if I even inadvertently did) talking about how terrible all the men are here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 03:55 PM
8

I personally don't believe many women do feel bad. The whole "women are the more empathetic gender" trope is mostly just mental masturbation. I have no expectation that women will feel bad. And in return I personally stopped feeling bad for women, it doesn't make sense anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 05:35 AM
0

No, are you consistent with how you view RP men (who say most women are crap according to you) and how you view the women here (who say most men are crap). I don't know how you got confused, read my last post again, especially this part: and believe most women here hate men too
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 05:19 AM
4

I would say so, some men get made fun of much more (and much harsher) than others. Some men get made fun of by a lower class of woman than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 05:04 AM
8

Birds of a feather flock together.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 05:02 AM
12

Being treated derisively by women is something that 90% of men (minimum) will experience many times throughout their life. What portion of women are killed, much less experience violence? It is like people who are afraid of dying in a plane crash, but driving everywhere everyday.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 04:55 AM
3

Chad doesn't care. He got sex. If Chad was worried about ethics, he wouldn't be pumping and dumping would he? Women who go after Chad think like you "oh here's a guy who is really desirable, he doesn't NEED to lie about an STD, so he probably doesn't" - and then WHAM chlamydia. You think women are demanding an STD panel from Chad? They're fucking him without even knowing if he'll text back the next day.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 03:47 AM
4

There is something about complaining that gets women off. I honestly feel like women HAVE to have stuff they complain about. And not only that, they HAVE to share it with SOMEONE.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 03:42 AM
2

Probably to his doctor.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 03:40 AM
3

Chad is a guy who can easily get a bunch of women (and does), just by numbers alone he is likely to have gotten at least one STD over the course of his life. But either way, she is more likely to get an STD than the man you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 03:38 AM
4

She's more likely to get an STD from the Chad who can get a bunch of women too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 03:31 AM
2

Most women here, whether blue, purple, or red, say the majority of men are crap. Are you consistent and believe most women here hate men too?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 03:20 AM
2

She was like 7 years older than that kid or something. Def a predatory relationship. That is why I think a lot of women project that men are only interested in age gap relationships for predatory reasons. That is why they would do it, so they assume men do too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 12:52 AM
1

Idc, I have no opinion either way, I just wouldn't oppose lowering it. I'm fine with the status quo. Whoever advocating for it can decide. But let's be honest, the people most in opposition to it would be the parents of daughters.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 12:38 AM
1

Drink, yes. As far as I know, the voting age was lowered due to men being sent off to war at 18. Didn't have anything to do with mental age. So yes, if they agree to getting sent off to war earlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 12:31 AM
4

A single mom in her 20s (which is my age range) is a HUGE red flag. A girl with multiple children at that age is basically only fit for a simp. It provides clues that she may be bad relationship material or at the very least has horrible sense. Maybe I'll get more desperate once I get into my 30s and 40s once my T levels start dropping. That is my reasoning for why older guys tend to be more simp-like.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 03:44 AM
1

The thing is, even if you do meet a girl IRL, there's a high chance she's on OLD every once in a while meeting guys there too. I've seen plenty of women I know from work, school, and my social circle on OLD - even girls most would say have no reason being on there.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 03:42 AM
15

The kid is 17 years old, he doesn't know shit yet. We need an age filter on this sub, for real. "Plenty of guys your size", things change after high school dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 03:37 AM
1

Omg you moron, I was talking about you harping on me to call out short men when there aren't even short men talking about race on this post. JFC, I can't even tell if you're just really dumb or pretending anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:22 PM
1

By harping on other people to make a stand about things that aren't even happening in this thread but then not doing that yourself regarding the racism occurring in your very thread by your in group.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:06 PM
3

Well, I'm the original commenter and I'm not paying attention to all the other comments. I'm just going by the red inbox message. But your point still made no sense. EDIT: Wtf, there's only one other guy commenting and that was hours ago on this chain. You're nutty.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:59 PM
3

What does dogpiling have to do here? Is English not your first language and you're just picking words at random hoping something sticks? I don't even know if you're drunk or something. "Women can already play in mixed chess", did I ever say they couldn't? I said the best female chess player would eventually be trans like this female trans Jeopardy player who surprise also plays in a mixed gender environment. You can't even think straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:53 PM
1

There you go being a hypocrite and excusing black women's racism. Show me the short guy on this thread being as bigoted as the black women here and I'll do more than you ever have
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:20 PM
14

They project a lot of their bigotry and are hypocritical regarding it, for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:08 PM
3

Do you even know what the word projection means? Based on context clues, you do not. Oh sure, the old "if I really tried, I'd so win". Suuuure.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:06 PM
1

What's good for the goose is good for the gander. And you're a hypocrite too, while black weren't just being bigoted about height they were being racist on this very thread and you had nothing to say about that. I never once said short people were victims, you are making stuff up. I criticize them for being bigoted hypocrites, of course. You're the fucking hypocrite for not saying anything about their racism right on your very thread. Typical hypocrisy and nastiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:05 PM
1

Yep, that is giga, she started her own reddit clone and advertised it here and femcel places.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:04 PM
9

It isn't even just sports anymore. The top Jeopardy female winner is now a transwoman, so they can't even just handwave it away with physical differences. They're winning the mental games too. Pretty soon the best female chess player will be a transgirl. Then the best models will be transwomen (Caitlyn was just the beginning). Then science will impregnate transwomen and they'll somehow be better at carrying fetuses too. The whole point of gender segregation is to give women a fighting chance - o…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:05 AM
4

Oh yeah, well let's watch a video from 1950 and see what they had to say about people like you. Clearly you care about what other people have to say rather than what's right or wrong. Like I said, it isn't like you have a small chance of having a short son even if you find a tall mate. You're rolling the dice. And any short son will probably hate your guts, and you'd deserve it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:00 AM
1

It was all fun and games, but then feelings got hurt and now I feel bad. I wasn't trying to hurt feelings, it was just purge.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:49 AM
5

If you're talking about Giga, I think she is banned from Reddit but keeps trying to come back and they eventually get her again.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:40 AM
1

Yeah, but it's my small pp not all Asian mens'. Aww geez, now I feel bad about hurting your feelings. It's just purge, not IRL. Black women are great and it isn't fun to feel alone, I know. You have allies aside from my short ass, even if those allies aren't doing a good enough job. This is the first time you got me close to crying and now I'm singing along to Changes over here. Keep Ya Head Up
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:14 AM
1

No, eating the forbidden fruit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 05:02 AM
1

He fucked up because he got baby trapped, but tbh they'd still be relatively looksmatched.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:59 AM
1

First time for everything, it was just simmering underneath the surface. I mean you were quick with bringing it out. I've noticed that IRL. Like there is some latent racism that comes up with the quickness. Don't talk about yourself that way bb. You're plenty smart. Poor men might be the exception. Stop doing that woman thing and making me feel bad for you. Make fun of my small pp again.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:57 AM
1

I heard about it, but they are both ugly so it seems boring. At least Deavan and Jihoon looked average at minimum.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:54 AM
1

Yara's a mess. If I watched that show, I would have immediately thought that was the baby trapping people talk about here. Jovi clearly didn't want a family yet, and just wanted to keep banging a hot Slavic girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:52 AM
1

There are though. I'm not one, but there are. No u.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:51 AM
1

It is sly and said in dogwhistles. I've been here for previous purges. You wouldn't notice it cuz it doesn't effect you. I'll admit my post was more in response to the short hate rather than Asian hate here. I did say that my experience was racial and was based on IRL rather than here. I mean, you've clearly exposed your deep seated hatred of Asian men. I could say that's normal for you too.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:50 AM
1

Nah, that is the truth. If I was talking about black women in that comment, I would have said it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:48 AM
1

All I can say is other Asian men shouldn't be judged based on me. Like I'm not Chinese, Japanese, Korean, or Indian like you must have thought I was. That's just generalization again. There's plenty of Asian men who simp for black women. But you got hurt feelings and I wasn't looking to do that to you specifically when I made that post. It was the purge so I didn't hold punches and didn't bother being sensitive, I thought you would have been thicker skinned considering your other posts and would…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:47 AM
2

Why would I watch how Anfisa talking about how Jorge was a major loser (which if I did watch I would agree with) and had grown to thrive and had a sweet little pad. I get my girl the BAG WITH THE MAKEUP without watching the show or being told to. I mean I'm not some loser who watches the show and thinks Julia and Brandon are relationship goals.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:35 AM
1

Well, I'm not gonna speak for em. But I think black women are too rough on them on some issues. Oh please, I made one comment and black women couldn't even handle that meanwhile many black women here constantly shit on Asian men, short men, "broke" men, and generally act shitty. Prime example of not being able to take it after dishing it out. I barely even talked about black women here before today. Even when they acted shitty before the Purge.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:33 AM
1

Don't get too in your feelings. Many black women are fine. There's a lot of stinkers though, as this thread has proved. I mean maybe you should take this up with the black woman who was shitting on short men if you're so invested in every axis of bigotry. The black girl I was with sure didn't feel hated.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:30 AM
1

Imagine worrying about internet karma LMAO. I mean I have 12, and I assume you or someone else who downvoted my other comments eliminated a couple more. So wow! And I got a Reddit award too. Soooo amazing! I'll give you an upvote too since you value them so much. I guess I'm your defender now. I mean I don't know why you're shitting on black men all of a sudden. They're just innocent bystanders here. But bigots don't tend to be bigoted against just one group, so I guess I'm not too surprised.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:26 AM
1

"People are nasty towards black women because they tend to be so nasty towards other people. It isn't their outward appearance that is necessarily ugly (although ugly black women obv exist), it is their inside." Mea culpa. I should have said "some". Does that calm your temper tantrum? But to be fair assuming all is stupid on your part. Women say "men are trash" and then say obv they aren't talking about all men and aren't misandrist. So by that logic, I shouldn't have had to say some. "At worst,…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:23 AM
2

Discovery+ gets them quicker, or TLC.com if you know someone with a cable/dish subscription. Not that I would ever watch that trash. <sup>Danielle</sup> <sup>and</sup> <sup>Anfisa</sup> <sup>are</sup> <sup>cray</sup>
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:17 AM
8

Are you gonna work long hard hours to provide for your wife and kids while she sits at home? Ok, the women here say that women always worked even before feminism. They just never got paid for it. So which is it? Did women of yesteryear work hard without compensation or did they just sit at home while she chilled?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:14 AM
–

What's the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:12 AM
1

Can you quote what you are talking about? Are you referring to this: He told on himself w the "a racist Asian guy will say some mean words - typically online and anonymously." Is English not your first language or something? Saying that doesn't mean I was talking about myself. That would happen if I was talking in the third person. So if I say "a racist black woman will say racist shit", that suddenly means I am a black woman? Are you dumb? Seriously, the stupidity you have displayed is soooo ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:06 AM
1

You're so stupid you can't even type good sarcasm. Why do you cunts act so dumb :(
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 04:00 AM
1

I mean, you've been here longer than I have. I went to the gym, had dinner, and came back to see you were still posting that whole time. The only thing I'll concede is that I left out the word "some"/"many"/"not all". Does that make you feel better and stop your little temper tantrum. But honestly that is such "not all men" shit. But assume "all" when I didn't even type all is so stupid. I never said black women have to atone for anything. I did not say they were all men. You are definitely gett…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:58 AM
47

Women are much more social Darwinist and eugenicist, this is completely true.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:54 AM
2

Nah, that's a dumb thing to say when this is over text and not voice. But you are kind of crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:50 AM
1

No, my point was some black women, especially the ones on this forum were hypocrites. You're the one who brought up what people "deserve", even before this thread was even created.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:50 AM
0

No, just like all black women aren't obese. However, you fit the mold. Sorry bout it Clayton Bigsby's sis.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:48 AM
1

Indian sizes probably have more to do with malnutrition than anything else. Also they ARE vegetarians and prob don't get enough protein. Also, I don't think you realize you never had an ACTUAL STUDY. I mean you have a racist map from a guy who believes black people have lower IQs and some random Indian Council - which aren't exactly the pinnacle of science. You have NOTHING objective without an actual study. Sorry bout it. It is actually kind of sad how gullible you are, or willing to believe ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:46 AM
2

Get rid of me then. Can't do shit about it. I'm gonna live right here and you can't do shit about it. Deal with it. And a short man will be a greater figure than your life will ever amount to. And a short man is still the richest man on Earth. Deal with it. You're a literal nobody. Deal with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:41 AM
–

I mean, you're a lot nicer than a lot of women would have been. Maybe he could have fingered you or ate you out or something (iffy due to no actual relationship). But I can't believe he didn't even go for the V after the second time, I would have been too scared of a hat trick if that ever happened to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:38 AM
1

The same heat map from the guy who said that said black people have IQs below literal mental retardation. Awesome. I mean, like I said, Indians aren't my struggle. The first source was from the Indian Council too. And they said 60% are in the normal range. They're not big, but they are normal. I guess 40% are shit out of luck. But honestly, Indians are currently struggling with more than penis size right now so I'm not gonna dump on them. You go ahead if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:30 AM
1

Whatever, they don't deserve the shit they get from black women IMO. I guess you believe ethnic women deserve it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:28 AM
1

Yeah, when I look for gender progressiveness the first place I think of is Kenya, Nigeria, or downtown Chiraq. Thanks for the laughs, sugar tits! Hood times!! Fuck, that actually was a typo. Fucking letters right next to each other. Btw, your obsession with Nordic men and countries is weird. Who's the white kissass again?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:26 AM
1

Do you even math? So 60% are between 5 and 6 inches. That is about the same for most ethnicities. Another 30 percent are in the 4 inch territory. That leaves 10 percent. Let's say that's 10% shorter than 4, rather than believing any Indian man can have more than 6 inches. That to me sounds about in line with international standards. 60% are in the normal range. It doesn't mean another 30 percent are 2 inches shorter than 5 inches, because that would add up to more than 100%. Honestly, it is just…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:24 AM
1

Well, I mean the women are the ones buying and using it. Sounds like they hate dark skin too. Nah, I love dark skin. Or purple skin, or red skin. Skin color doesn't bother me. Shitty attitudes sure do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:20 AM
1

Ah yes, sexism sure is a bigger problem in the Asian community. Not the other one where women are killed at higher rates and have higher single motherhood. So sorry for my Asianness there. Oh, and we oppress our women so hard they actually have higher educational and income rates than even white women. Ohmygosh we're so horrible. And our tiny dicks create SUCH shitty countries with high GDPs and HDIs - why can't we be more like the BIG DICK COUNTRIES :(. And we're so whiny that we don't need AA …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:19 AM
1

Well, many countries ARE developing - literally a fact. Sorry bout it. You're the one who apparently thinks masculinity determines value. Nope, you got me confused with someone else. I'm 5'7.5''. I mean you're clearly just a nasty person who tries to hurt people based on what you think they're insecure about. Unfortunately, it didn't work on me. Something something Ming-Lee, something something you think race determines penis size. Keep going Hotep. So sad you're so racist. I mean real talk, are…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:12 AM
1

Uh huh, and all those posts about "peewee dicks" and "Koreans" and "Chinese" blahblah aren't white sheet? And saying shit like "Ming-Lee" isn't white sheet. You need to do like Michael Jackson said and "start with the man in the mirror". You're the prime example of being able to dish it out and not being able to take it. Yeah, it does suck that black people got the short end of the stick, which even liberals acknowledge - but if you're gonna get into a racism battle that's gonna be the inevitabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:04 AM
1

Where's the actual study, not some paragraph length blog entry? I'm not Indian either. Any more ethnicities you'd like to throw out? Also, that post says: But data collected in Mumbai till 2001 showed that 60% of the participants measured 126 to 156 mm in length So 60 percent of men were in the average range anyway. Do you even know that 126 mm means 5 inches? Oh wow, so shitty for having an average sized penis. Most other studies showed men across ethnicities fall in that range as well. So you …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:02 AM
1

I talked about black woman because that is who the OP literally talked about. Are you really going to pretend she didn't literally use the words black woman in her post. You're being so stupid. Nah, I love subsaharan Africans. You're nothing like them. I've actually lived in Africa before, have you? Btw, a lot of subsaharan Africans ARE short too. You should tell them how much they suck for that. Unfortunately, many also have micropenis problems due to malnutrition. You should tell them how subh…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:00 AM
1

YOU go to Asia and tell them how they all have small dicks since you're so obsessed with them. I actually have lived in 3 different African countries before. Most people are pretty great, it is a shame you share an ethnicity with them. They don't deserve it. Wasn't hard to prove you're a typical racist black girl. All it took was pointing out hypocrisy and the Hotep came out. Ok, I deserve everything I get as a short Asian man including my gf, nice job, good house in a safe neighborhood, and awe…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:58 AM
1

Oh my god, you're still harping on that? Read my other post where you talk about it. Sure. That's fine with me. Koreans are doing fine. I personally would prefer to live in Korea rather than your ancestral homeland with their BIG SWINGING DICKS. Guess that DICK doesn't help much with civilization. If DICK SIZE is so valuable maybe you should leave your country founded by white people and go to a BIG DICK COUNTRY since they're so great. If YOU weren't so racist it would be less funny. I'm not wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:34 AM
2

You literally believe men like MLK Jr should have been aborted. Don't try to pretend you give a fuck about black people.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:14 AM
2

There are lots of women who say it is natural for short men to be treated worse. It is biological. They got outcompeted. If you believe that, then do you believe it is natural for black women to have been treated the way they were for most of human history? They just got outcompeted by everyone else. It is hilarious to me the same people who are social Darwinists about height conveniently excuse their own demographic from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:12 AM
1

That's one possible theory. Why don't you get an education and try and prove it. Other people with an education HAVE proven black women tend to have more testosterone. Can't believe how butthurt you are about it. To be quite honest, you probably are more masculine than the typical Asian guy. We sure are crying with our relatively well developed countries. Boohoo.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:10 AM
3

You are so fucking dense. OF COURSE IT IS. I'm the one who initially talked about racial differences in testosterone dummy. Was that supposed to be some gotcha? I'm not Korean, but they're doing fine with their lower testosterone. I'd rather visit it than Sweden, and Kpop boys are doing fine. Also, that is about testosterone excretion. Did you read it? I mean there probably is racial differences, but I'm just pointing out it wasn't talking about lower total testosterone, but testosterone excreti…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:06 AM
1

I never pretended to be a victim. Women are so obsessed with victimhood they project it like crazy. Nope, this thread was about RACE and BLACK WOMEN. I talked about RACE and BLACK WOMEN.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:04 AM
1

Because there is no scientific evidence that penis size is linked to race. If you have some actual scientific evidence and not some map that was made in Photoshop, there wouldn't be a problem. What, do half black guy/half Asian guys have the penis size of a white guy? You're being dumb as fuck. If you believe the penis size map by that racist white guy, then you'd have to believe the IQ map made by him too. Show me the study. An actual study. You haven't used logic yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:03 AM
1

I will when they do it as much as black women. Show me the threads and I will call them out.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:02 AM
1

Why should I. They're not the ones running all over this sub doing that. Show me all the threads and I will. There was maybe one thread, and the guy was prob average height. There's MANY threads by black women. Talk about missing the forest for the trees.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:01 AM
1

Sounds good to me, dickless.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 02:00 AM
1

And I have a scientific article saying they do. You're the one who thinks more testosterone is a bad thing. What's next, people are racist for saying black people have darker skin? For having curlier hair? Show me some actual evidence for your claim, except all you have is some racism from a person who believes black people have IQs below mental retardation. Nope, black women have been bigoted here waaaay longer than when I posted my comment today. I said that stuff because YOU deserved it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 12:13 AM
1

I was pointing out that many black women themselves are complicit in the bigotry, proven by multiple different users on this very thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 12:11 AM
1

Oh no! I'll never get married or have a woman attracted to me according to some woman who gets her "science" from the Daily Mail. Boohoo.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 12:10 AM
0

/u/CFinCanada <---- right here
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 12:07 AM
4

She also loves the "small Asian dick" stereotype. Not that /u/LillithofBabylon would ever call out racism from a black woman. I actually like that she came in, she pretty much proved my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 12:06 AM
1

Poor lesbians. They got off lucky not having to deal with your stank ass. But lucky Asian dicks. And you literally came here unprompted being racist towards Asians like a typical racist black woman. I didn't swallow any L's. I gave you actual scientific articles that you got upset by, you resorted to providing me with "science" from a guy that literally thinks your average IQ is below a literal mentally challenged person. Bravo. Great win! There's that obsession with Asian dick. You think I'm hu…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 12:04 AM
0

And I never said anything about all black women. Thank you for proving my point that you don't give a shit about the black women being racist towards others. I've shown multiple evidence of black women being heightist and racist, but you don't give a shit - why? Cuz you're a black woman yourself and you excuse bigotry from that group.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 12:01 AM
1

Doesn't sound like there's too much space for em. Lucky them, I'd actually feel sorry for them if you were fucking them, never know what they would catch ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 12:00 AM
1

You are way too obsessed with Asian dicks. Imagine being this much of child nearing 40. I'd literally rather put my dick in a meat grinder than have it anywhere near your stank ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:58 PM
1

Why would I talk about short men when your main topic was about race you dillhole? I didn't make any excuses for short men in my post. Your claim about me making them out to be angels was just stupid and proof that you are reading into things and making up things. No, you just want to excuse the hate black women spew.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:56 PM
1

If any human being chooses to be friends with a nasty piece of work like you, they deserve all the misery they get.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:51 PM
1

Doesn't matter, dump garbage people works too you dumb hole.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:50 PM
1

I'm nonofyourfuckingbusinessese. We're all "Ming-Lee" or "Chu Kwon" to you anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:48 PM
0

You are bigoted against short men for one, you stereotype them in this very thread. You yourself may not be bigoted against Asians (or you just have not let it slip yet), but this thread did an excellent job of dragging out the racist black women out of the woodwork (and the regulars haven't even shown up yet). I noticed you don't have shit to say to them. You don't care about black women being bigoted at all. You may not have been explicitly bigoted on this thread, you just implicitly accepted …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:47 PM
0

It is wild how crazy some people get when pointing this out, rather than sitting down and going - oh wow, maybe I should do some introspection and stop treating other people horribly.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:45 PM
2

Great autistic joke. So funny how dump people resort to childish insults when they can't keep up intellectually.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:43 PM
2

As I said, you are the best proof of what my initial comment said. Thank you for your service. I guess that's a yes to the IQ map then.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:41 PM
1

bitter men being absolutely god human beings and then blaming height as to why they're so unlikable. Where? Where have I ever done this? Because that's all you care about. No, I care about lots of things. YOU don't care about holding black women accountable like everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:41 PM
2

It isn't deflecting. You made a point about China, and I'm not Chinese so I had nothing to say about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:39 PM
2

Oh my fuck, that IS the racist map I just talked about made by the same guy who made this map about IQ: https://historyinfographics.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/IQ-by-country.jpg. So if you believe that penis size map, do you also believe the IQ map. JFC, you are so dumb. Also, that is a DAILY MAIL article, the equivalent of Fox News. Do you even have an actual SCIENTIFIC article? Do you think Daily Mail counts as science? JFC, the stupidity. And here we go with more stupidity. What kind of so…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:36 PM
3

You stereotype short men with napoleon complex on this very thread you absolute moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:31 PM
2

And you for pointing out your own bigotry.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:30 PM
1

So? It was another example. Me too.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:29 PM
0

No the answer is I'm not into wading through your pile of shit. Nah, I'm pointing out bigotry by black women and that hurts your feelings because that would mean you would have to do some introspection. Call them out for what? I didn't treat them like victims, I said both or none - that is putting everyone on equal footing. You're the one playing victim here. I do. I believe people deserve to be treated based on how they treat others. That is consistency. Once black women stop making threads shi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:29 PM
1

Well, I'm not Chinese. But I will say, having been in a study abroad place in an African university, that they like Asians in particular for the money they bring in. Keep in mind, it is often black men making those decisions not black women, and I didn't say anything about black men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:23 PM
2

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3455741/: That is for men, but if I dig deep enough I'll probably find one for women. https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2021/08/another-woman-high-natural-testosterone-disqualified-olympics/. What's next, I'm racist for saying black women have dark skin? You're dumb. Give me actual research that penis size is correlated to race. And not that racist map one that was made by the same guy saying that black and Asian people had lower IQs than white people. YOU are the hypoc…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:22 PM
1

If that is what you consider a joke, then you've just proven who the real autistic retard is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:18 PM
2

Loud and proud
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:17 PM
1

Good for them. And Asians were all over the Black Lives Matter thing too.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:17 PM
1

Do you have like reading comprehension problems? I never used the word all. You are just projecting right now, you must think in terms of all and are projecting to think other people do too. And you're a garden-variety racist black girl. When have Asian men ever joined the Klan. My god, even your insults are sooooo stupid. Like seriously there's probably been more black people shaking hands with the Klan than there have been Asian considering how black supremacist groups worked with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:16 PM
2

... I'm not.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:13 PM
2

And to think, I actually stuck up for these peewee-dicked mofos during the last purge Telling on yourselves again. You just can't help but expose your inner biases. Like one man points out they have racists in your community, so they go out of your way to prove it themselves. Bravo.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:13 PM
1

Well, the person I linked in my article is an African immigrant (or her family is). But poor nutrition does also create short people in the black community here too. I lived in some rough neighborhoods in my youth, so I saw that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:10 PM
2

Ah, the kindergarten insults. Chefs kiss. Really hope you can grow out of it by your 40th. Just don't punch an Asian oldhead on your way out and nobody will fuck with your ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:09 PM
2

Well, I'm not Chinese. You want me to share all those articles about Africans being racist towards Asian in Uganda and S Africa too? But notice it is another Asian calling out Asians and sticking up for Africans there.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:08 PM
3

Yeah he can't even deny they're racist as hell Oh yeah, black women totally don't generalize Asian people at all. Nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:05 PM
2

I have heard that black women on average have more testosterone. But I have lived on numerous African countries, and there are a lot of short people there. That may be due to poor nutrition, but the end result is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:01 PM
1

No u
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:00 PM
3

Yeah because women have shown that's how they think. So we have to speak to them on their level.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 11:00 PM
5

Pot calling the kettle African American.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:59 PM
3

3 months is hardly a pump and dump. Ok. Maybe she'll get tired picturing another man by year 3. Imagine thinking these elementary school age disses would bother me. You're like 40. Grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:59 PM
4

I'm not going through all of your posts. You posts like a 1000 times a day about meaningless shit. But you know you're like the queen bitch of this subreddit and say nasty shit generalizing men all the time. Next time I see it, I'll make a point to link to it. Sure, that has real women behind keyboards typing all that shit. It is a frame of reference, because I can't obv refer to my life experiences cuz you can't see those right? There's plenty of women who act like that in real life. When did I…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:57 PM
3

Ok, then there's no argument and no reason for us to talk. I mean it's not. And it was too bad it happened. But I'm just saying racism goes both ways. Your example is like the exception that proves the rule. That was from 30 years ago. I can show you multiple videos from the last couple of years of Asian oldheads being killed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:51 PM
6

I never used the word all. Try reading. And it wasn't unprompted, I was pointing out the OPs bad reasoning. Black women here say the same stuff about Asian men. And I actually used evidence. They ARE disproportionately bigoted, not just on height but IME on race too. I can present numerous videos of black women attacking Asian grannies. Your racism blinds you to it, you probably don't think it is a big deal because it happens to Asians. Already said I had a gf. And nice try, at one point in my l…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:49 PM
3

Noticed you left the second part out, try taking your own advice. It is a laugh to pretend black women aren't racist towards others or that Asian men are somehow more racist. Oh sure, let's talk about one case from 30 years ago. And how many Asian grandpas have died from sucker punches this year? And are we gonna pretend that Asian woman WASN'T racially abused on the daily by her own community for daring to have a business there and not being the "right" race?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:45 PM
5

Why not. Women blame men for everything every other man does. Asian men get blamed for other Asian men. Are black women above it when they do the same racist shit themselves? Nah, you're racist and just trying to project. I treat black women like I treat everyone else. I wish black women would do the same. And so do women then, past, present, and future. Well, I mentioned before that I currently have a gf. And am only in my 20s. So I'll let you know if that does happen in 60 years, but you might…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:42 PM
8

Actually, that particular girl LOVED black women. In fact, she was saying "black women > short men existence" and that short men should be aborted (I assume including MLK Jr), I can link it if you don't believe me. I do suspect she might have been partially black. Or she might have a lot of black woman influence in her life to take on that type of mindset. Oh boohoo, I point out black women are racist sometimes and I'm the racist. Sounds like projection there.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:40 PM
5

At worst, a racist Asian guy will say some mean words - typically online and anonymously. Meanwhile, this summer Asian had to beg "Stop Asian Hate" so other racists wouldn't sucker punch some old Asian granny.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:35 PM
13

Oh please, you stereotype men all the time. I did say especially on this forum. But if you look at Twitter, it is a fact that they show up disproportionately. So what, we're just supposed to let black women stereotype short men? If black women WEREN'T disproportionately stereotyping short men, I wouldn't have even made that point, so tl;dr you (figuratively) started it. Take it up with the black woman I linked to. And it isn't like it is just height either. I've seen a lot of black woman stereot…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:33 PM
27

Some Black women are like the most heightist people, especially on this forum. Exhibit A: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/ruf9ad/why_wont_men_accept_the_fact_that_tall_men_are/. But there are the regulars like throwaway123whatever and HedonismBot. It is funny because MLK was only 5'5'', but they hate short men with a passion. Even if you look at those Twitter threads, black women are disproportionately represented. They are also disproportionately represented among FDS. People…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:20 PM
1

I mean, OP is a black woman who immigrated here from a non Western nation. To do what you are saying, short western men need to be okay with basically leaving the western world, because if you bring a woman here she'll act the same. I would be ok not living in the West, but that isn't realistic for a lot of short men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 08:43 PM
2

No u
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 08:23 PM
1

No u
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 08:11 PM
–

Eyyy STFU you mad bitch
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 08:03 PM
3

I don't WANT another pedo to exist in the world, just seems sus. Hide ya kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 08:00 PM
1

Imagine being dickless and calling yourself a man ROFL. Major small dick energy here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:49 PM
4

No, I always said you should NOT have a short son. I don't think you should procreate. I'm just pointing out that you're a worthless person. And short men are worth more than you. Like I said, any short son would hate your guts, and you deserve it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:48 PM
1

Nah, you just got got. 5/10 with rice.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:47 PM
1

Uh huh
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:47 PM
1

I bet you hear "bite me" a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:46 PM
4

Notice you keep ignoring my MLK point. That ONE short man has contributed more to humanity than you or anyone in your family ever will.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:45 PM
-1

Lol, imagine downvoting me cuz you're so butthurt. Sure thing, dickless.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:45 PM
1

Then why didn't those men protect their daughters throughout history while women were being oppressed? I'm pro my father, I think most people have shit fathers. Your dad sounds like a loser if he couldn't even end sexism despite being 6'6''. Any sexism you have ever experienced in your life is due to your father's incompetence in preventing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:43 PM
3

Do you think MLK Jr's mother was sad about him being short or not? Do you look down on him or not? Was your mom old? That's why she couldn't bag a tall man?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:39 PM
–

Did they though? Or did they sell them off to the highest bidder, or some schlub to create stronger ties? Sounds like you're not too opposed to tall men picking their daughter's husbands. Respect. I would agree tall dads would know better than their daughters on who they should marry. Then why didn't he protect them from female oppression in general? And if a tall dad ended up being an abuser, who was going to protect them from him? Sounds like feminism is only necessary for daughters of short a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:37 PM
5

Exactly. This woman is a vile plague in the human gene pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:33 PM
–

Didn't dads control most aspects of their daughters lives, including who they married? If tall men protected them so well, why didn't they protect them from the "patriarchy"? Or is your point that women with tall fathers never experienced female oppression?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:31 PM
4

Nah, it is nonsense to try and pretend you aren't just as guilty of being inferior as you claim short men are. Why didn't your mother bag a tall man then? You hate your short father? You look down on MLK Jr because he was only 5'5''? Should his mother be disappointed in him for being short? You're a horrible person, and I feel sorry for any sons you have - short or tall. They'll probably hate you if they are short, and you would deserve it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:25 PM
–

Do tall men fetishists ever realize that tall men were probably the ones who led the so called "oppression" of women? Think about it, if it were only short or average height men that wanted to oppress women, then tall men could have easily stopped them and saved women with their superiority. But instead they either a) got cucked by shorter people and just allowed them to oppress their precious women, or b) actively engaged in oppressing women which even if short and average height men wanted to …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:23 PM
5

Of course, that homeless woman really hit home for you huh? More women have spent time here than I have, I guess they're all sad too huh? If anyone liked you in real life, you wouldn't have spent your entire New Years Day shitposting here. So congrats, you just played yourself. Who has their feelings hurt? You're the one following people around. I love being short. Who cares? I'd hate to be a cunt like you. Better you suffer living your life than me. Haha running away like a little bitch after f…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:10 PM
3

Nah, I found it hilarious and sad that you spent your entire New Years Day being a sad little troll. Yeah, you should abort your short son - I totally agree. Any child would be miserable having you for a mother. You should have told MLK Jr's mom to abort his ass since he was only 5'5''. You should have told Coretta Scott King to abort her babies because their father was short and her sons are below average height. Now you're following me around - unbelieveable how sad of a person you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:03 PM
8

Are you even aware of how genes work? You don't get to choose which X chromosome you pass on to your son. Are you aware because men only have one X chromosome, only the mother contributes to their X chromosome? That means your short son WILL inherit your inferior X chromosome. If a man doesn't care about having an "inferior" short son - why would he care about anything else. He wouldn't care if he was there to raise his inferior son. If tall men don't mind dating shorter woman, how come one didn…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 07:02 PM
7

It's the purge sweaty. No one's sensitive except you. I can say whatever I want. Like so: you're a cunt and I don't give a fuck about your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:57 PM
10

Yea, but it proves you carry inferior genes (especially compared to your sister). And you would be polluting tall genes with your inferior ones. Loser tall men exist. Why would a superior tall men choose to mate with a short woman when tall women exist. Not only is he increasing his own chances for an "inferior" son, but he is also giving up having an even taller son with the tall woman. Ergo, a tall man who chooses to mate with you is more likely to be a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:51 PM
7

She isn't thinking clearly. She keeps saying "oh I need to make my genes better so I'll pick the superior tall man". But think about it. Loser tall men exist. Why would a superior tall men choose to mate with a short woman when tall women exist. Not only is he increasing his own chances for an "inferior" son, but he is also giving up having an even taller son with the tall woman. Ergo, a tall man who chooses to mate with her is more likely to be a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:50 PM
7

All women's current behavior has proven is the so called "oppression" was entirely justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:47 PM
8

And your son will inherit yours. It isn't like you had tall parents so they could skip a generation. And what if the tall man was an exception to the rule with short parents too? Then the chances of a short go up, don't they? He could be heterozygous for the tall gene, and your son could get the short one instead of the tall one. Think about it, are your genes really up to par if your mother had to settle for a short man? You wouldn't be making your genes better, you'd be making some one else's …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:42 PM
15

I like how women act like "hitting a nerve" is some sort of gotcha. Of course people who are effected would speak up. All the women here have their nerves hit on being bitches, that's why they lash out themselves on this forum for years on end.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:34 PM
5

All the ex-wives of pedos always went "he's def not a pedo" before he was exposed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:32 PM
5

Guys who ONLY date small women are sus, especially if they get off on the size difference. Hope he doesn't end up being a pedo.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:25 PM
5

But it is a guarantee that you will be a cunt to your short son. At this point you're just relying on luck. Jeremy Lin's parents were short. If you were unlucky enough to be short yourself, why would you think you'll be lucky getting a tall son?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:24 PM
9

Women like her should never have sons. Like the government should pay for their male abortions. It really isn't fair for a child to grow up with a mother like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:18 PM
22

You could still have a short son. That poor bastard with you as a mom. Bill Gates's dad was 6'7'' and Bill is barely 5'10''. Jaden Smith is short too and Will is tall (Jada is short isn't she). Wasn't Michael Jordan's son only average height.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:14 PM
1

Wouldn't know. But biting dicks sounds like something crazies/misandrists are into.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:53 PM
0

No one in human history has given a shit about your opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:02 PM
1

Sounds hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:00 PM
1

I've thought about this some. Wouldn't it be better, according to women, if women were the ones who had to get hard to have sex? Or if the physically weaker sex was the one who would penetrate and could control whether sex would involve penetration or not? Is it cruel irony, or intelligence design by God/mother nature?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:33 AM
6

This. I reject the notion that this is the "darkest timeline". It was a good thing that men were made the stronger sex and were the dominant sex. If it were women, this place would be hell on earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 06:31 AM
9

That's not anyone here implied from what I see. They don't seek him out. Obv this guy has to go out in the world to make money and do basic functions. And in that world there are women walking around. And in those encounters is when this happens. They aren't going to his house to bully him. But some Karens DO unnecessarily impose themselves in other people's lives to be a bully. If it has a racial tint, then yeah it makes the news. But there are plenty of Karens doing it in situations the news c…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:33 AM
21

The panic only lasts for a couple of years. I know what you are talking about, but they pretty much give up by 35 and just focus on other things. If they are hot, they still have casual sex. You must be in the North or on the coasts if it was pushed back to their early 40s.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:30 AM
13

Then 9/10 women don't deserve respect. And you're right too many men tolerate women's bullshit, hopefully the proportion of men who don't will grow. Of course, that will just be called misogyny by the butthurt.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:23 AM
–

Sorry, but homosexuals are too gay for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:21 AM
7

So? That's just whataboutism. Women get all butthurt if women complain about something and men say you know women do that too - here we see they complain hypocritically, cuz they do the exact same. Then both don't deserve respect in general. Women can't pretend to have the high horse and demand respect when they act just as shitty.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:21 AM
14

"Did every single person bully that kid in school? No? Then he never got bullied" - your logic. "Not all men" energy in here. Was OP talking about you specifically? He was talking about women in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:19 AM
–

Lie down and rot.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:14 AM
10

being treated kindly Oh please. The OP said he was short. Women say shit like "short men don't deserve to exist", "short men are a mistake" etc. It isn't just about not being sexually attracted to them. They verbally abuse them and try to tear them down emotionally when they are already emotionally vulnerable. And women who don't do that specifically just handwave it away and minimize it. And that's just height. There are so many dimensions women do that on, whether it is due to speech impedimen…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:11 AM
20

Oh come on, women are vile to unattractive men. They say the nastiest stuff to them and bully them emotionally. They use their social power to bully them socially. The only reason women don't do that is because they are afraid of the pushback. And women definitely do show bias against ugly men when they have positions of power to hire and fire people. If women were physically stronger, I would not be surprised if they physically bullied ugly men as well - thank god or nature that women were made…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 05:08 AM
1

ok
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:52 AM
1

No luck needed, that's for fools.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:49 AM
2

Believe whatever you want, I was poor until I was 12 and lower middle class until I was 19.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:49 AM
2

No, I associate being in control of your own life to be competence. Human nature has been cruel, but the point is some people can meet their goals and others are incapable of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:46 AM
2

Do you even know what an metaphor is? You are reaching so hard, or have clear reading comprehension issues. So you think smarter people are better people? Because I never said better. Now who's the discriminator? I think stupid people have just as much value as smart people. You're the one bragging about how intellectually superior women are. I am upper middle class, but was born to a poor family, so I know both sides. Nope, not a dropout at all. Working towards my doctorate right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:33 AM
2

Yes, it is cognitive dissonance. You don't want to believe women are incapable of it so you say "oh we totally could, we just dont want to". The same way a kid with no hope of making it into college could go "oh I totally could go to Oxford, I just don't want to live in England". It is saving face. When have I portrayed myself as a victim? This is what I mean about you making up arguments in your head. There have in fact been times when African and brown men have oppressed white men. Such as whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:29 AM
2

From what specifically? I think you are making up arguments in your head. Women helped build it, women still had some benefits under the patriarchy. A major part for sure. No, I think it is hilarious to think so. No nerve struck. I don't really care if you think men are stupid. To me, it is the equivalent of the high school dropout bragging about "street smarts" and thinking he is smarter than the PhD for having book smarts. Just delusional cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:20 AM
0

Who even settles for handjobs past high school lol. What are you, fucking teenagers?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:15 AM
2

That is cope though. In the manner of "you can't fire me, I quit!". That is something you tell yourself to make yourself feel better about the incompetence and as a way to make yourself feel morally superior. Now you're just throwing shit at the wall hoping anything sticks. How is what I said anything like "all lives matter"? Do you even know what that means? No, I don't. That was to show you the logical fallacy of your claim. And your abortion fantasy is peak female delusion. Sad coming from th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:13 AM
2

I did not say women did not contribute to it. I completely believe that women helped build and are complicit in the patriarchy they complain so much about. Men do not have sole responsibility for it for sure. What I said is they create it and did not create a female based on like men did. Race and gender are not the same. Odd, since I'm not the one who explicitly stated that one gender was intellectually superior to another. Pot calling the kettle black there.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:10 AM
2

And if men wanted to stop you from doing that, even if that meant strapping you down as human incubators, we could. Our morality keeps us from doing so. If women woke up one day said "you can't force me to have children" and men said "yes we can", men would win that argument if morality wasn't in question. No it isn't. You just want to see it that way. Pretty sad that a shriveled up, small Y chromosome could do so much damage to the "intellectually superior gender" for thousands of years isn't i…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:04 AM
2

Are you saying are a black or Asian man who had the desire to assault your ex, but sadly you are not white and didn't think youd get away with it? That's how it reads. Where did this even come from? What a bizarre conclusion and I don't even see where you drew it from. What is your definition of abuse? If he, an adult, consented to being called a slave then a woman calling him one is not abuse - he asked for it. Similarly, a woman who consents to be called a whore is not being abused by being ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 04:00 AM
2

By that logic, throughout most of history men didn't oppress women by not stopping women from being born (completely, obv femicide existed). That's a dumb point. I would even counter that the reason women didn't do this is because they feared consequences from men for killing their male heirs. I disagree though that gender supremacy is like racial supremacy. Race is largely a social construct and exists in a continuum. Differences are due to long term environmental factors. Theoretically, if you…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:52 AM
2

Projecting what? Do you know the definition of projecting? Your point is that they do not have a DESIRE to. Being unable to doesn't mean a lack of desire, it means a lack of ability. Don't see how that is confusing. So, I went to that, and the one that was near the top was /r/whore_abuse. So I was like "oh, this is what she was talking about". But then I noticed that half the posts on that sub is women making posts about how they are whores. While there probably are some questionable ones, they …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:43 AM
5

Women have no problem with hot men approaching them at work, in the store, or even prison if they work there.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:26 AM
2

See, you couldn't help yourself but get nasty and go for personal attacks. Typical. Nah, I would say you're doing the opposite. Because you are a woman, you downplay the nastiness from women and are sensitive to the nastiness from men. In my view, they are more or less equal. Maybe they are expressed in different ways, but women are just as horrible. What subs? Just curious. Women don't just refuse to date short men. My point was that they actively hate them. And based on that hatred, if they co…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:22 AM
2

Yes, this is the closest they'll get and what I suspect we are trending towards. In some ways, I do believe women were complicit with the patriarchy in oppressing the bottom tier men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:09 AM
2

The counterpoint I have to this is that women aren't strangers to oppression as you portray when they are aided by men in achieving that oppression. For example, although white women try to push the responsibility of slavery all on white men, the truth of the matter is that white women were complicit and did plenty of oppression themselves during slavery times. You can see women oppressing even other women today in Arab countries or SEA countries. So women aren't as averse to oppression as you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:00 AM
3

Women clearly believe in hierarchy, which is why they hate "subpar" (read: even slightly below average) men so much. So that doesn't hold water. But that still doesn't answer the question. If men ARE and HAVE BEEN so horrible, why does a woman's morality think it is better to let it happen than to oppress them? By your logic, the women being oppressed by the Taliban are morally superior for not reversing the oppression (even though they are intellectually capable of easily doing so) and letting …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:35 AM
3

LMAO, imagine actually believing this. So your morality says it is better to not oppress us (who I assume you consider evil) even if that means you will be oppressed (and I imagine you see your gender as good)?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:16 AM
3

Hmmm... but female oppression didn't start with modern humans though. Like I'm sure it started before we even evolved into humans. There are some apes that could be said to have female oppression. It almost feels intrinsic, but something that we are thwarting nature on for the good of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:12 AM
2

I thought you didn't have a soul. Now I see that you might. You might...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 02:08 AM
7

Never forget. Her ho friend made out with guys after using them for free drinks. An excuse was her bf cheated "first". I can't remember any other details. Sometimes girls get "too drunk" deliberately so they can get pity even for cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 01:59 AM
2

Chicken or egg situation. The only counterpoint I can think of is that there are some societies that are close to "matriarchies", like the Mosuo, and from what I remember they still resented men. Of course they can't really oppress men due to biological differences, but if they could, I think they would.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 01:47 AM
4

Do you think women would have oppressed men if they could have? Seeing the kind of hatred they have towards men, I don't really even think that is a question. Which is why I think it is stupid to feel guilty about "female oppression". They just got outcompeted. And seeing the glee they have for men on the bottom of the totem pole, it is hypocritical for them to be so upset about getting the short end of the stick sometimes too.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 01:42 AM
2

No, I meant flirting with guys to get free drinks. That's relativism. Once you've been cheated on, you've been cheated on. I don't care if she just cheated by blowing a guy rather than having anal sex with him, even if one is "worse".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 08:33 PM
6

It portrays the ugly woman as virtuous. She is able to look past appearance and has these great views while the ugly man doesn't. The comic is about the ugly woman trying to want this ugly guy because she's so great, but apparently the ugly guy doesn't want her. This is the exact opposite of how things play out in real life btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 08:31 PM
2

Where was my whataboutism? I don't even think you know what that word means. I was talking about the woman presented in the image (representing ugly women). You're talking about some outside scenarios. You whining about "ugly men this, ugly men that", but when I show you an example of an ugly man having an awful, you want to ignore it. JFC you're so tilted you lost grammatical ability. Calm down lady. I never claimed ugly men were better. This post is trying to claim that ugly women are better o…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 08:28 PM
7

But it is also true though. Ugly women have a much easier time attracting a mate than their male counterparts. Women also get more sympathy for being sad than men do, so I have to disagree with that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 08:25 PM
2

He, and many people, would probably see what she did as cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 08:23 PM
4

That's what you claimed. And? How does your post do anything regarding that? WOW! You mean men might actually do shit to fuck up with relationships with women?! I'm glad you finally learned that! Some trans woman in some weird subculture. Meanwhile, ignoring an ugly guy who sexually harassed women and raped his own mother. This is just whataboutism. Did I claim ugly men were angels? You seem to make that logical mistake here and in the previous quote. Actually your example just shows trans women…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 08:20 PM
5

My friend does this thing where she doesn’t tell people she has a boyfriend, to finesse free drinks. If she did this before he cheated, then she doesn't deserve any sympathy either.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 08:17 PM
5

People do. Hardly, men are no more hypocrites than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 08:12 PM
6

What does that have to do with my post? I googled and saw something about trans and realized this is some nutty case. I don't know all the intricacies of that subculture, but trying to extrapolate that to the general pop is stupid. That example has nothing to do with how women treat ugly men. Chris Chan apparently doesn't even present as a man. Honestly, your post doesn't follow mine at all. Ugly girls do tend to have ugly personalities. The only thing I can concede is that their personalities a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 08:10 PM
5

My views on women didn't change after losing my virginity. And incels get things right about women than most people here would like to admit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 07:43 PM
5

Lesbians tend to be more forgiving about fat women than straight women are about fat men. It isn't comparable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 07:38 PM
6

Nah, if it was true, the ugly woman would be off to the side judging him instead of trying to be nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 07:35 PM
17

Not even close. It is just using the trope of women being these pure hearted nice creatures when that clearly isn't the case. Real life shows women aren't nice to ugly men even if they are ugly themselves. IME ugly girls tend to have ugly attitudes too.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 07:13 PM
34

Oh please, ugly women have a muuuuuuch easier time getting men than vice versa. Ugly women brag about how they could get a man in a second, meanwhile being below average as a man makes it highly likely you'll struggle.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 06:59 PM
3

You must have missed this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/rt6mb8/women_should_be_allowed_to_abort_their_short_sons/ Even though it is purge, pretty sure she means it. Although to be fair, she seems off her rocker. But there are def a lot of women on here who hate short men. I do see it coming disproportionately from black women, which is ironic. I think that girl with the Throwaway12343whatever name has said some shit about short men and she's black. But there's a lot …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 06:26 PM
2

I see a lot of women saying shit like "short men shouldn't exist" or should die and stuff like that. It doesn't bother me, because I am okay with being short no matter how bitchy women are about it. But with MLK day coming up in a couple of weeks. I think it gets forgotten that MLK was only 5'5'', shorter than me. If he hadn't been assassinated, today he'd still be at an age where he could be alive. I'd love to see the badass women here tell him he should have been aborted or that he's useless. …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 06:18 PM
1

I really hope this girl is an invalid stuck in a bed or something, because otherwise her life is just too sad. I'm betting she is one of those 600 lb women that is confined to her bed. Can you imagine posting nonstop for hours?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:57 PM
1

Sounds like someone resembles homeless women in more ways than just money. You want people to actually not exist or die. You laugh at suicide. Imagine thinking that's not worse. I'm short. So what? I don't have a problem with it. If it keeps bitches like you away from me, I consider that an advantage. You know your life is sad when you spend hours upon hours alone on a day most people spend with people that care about them. Must suck to not have that. I'd rather be short than be like you. But I …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:52 PM
1

LMAO, so what? That is no more weird than saying people should be aborted for their height. And I love how you're actually going through my posts and reading them. All I did was see you've been posting for hours. I guess real recognize real then huh? My New Year's resolution is to never end up like you and spend New Year's posting on here trying to get a rise out of people. Yeah, and so have other people. Many longer than me. Many of them are the so called blue pilled women like yourself. Can't …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:44 PM
1

Happy for me, not for you, clearly. Yeah, I'll be sure to tell all the other posters who have been here for years (many of them women) that we should all go to therapy together. But you need a special one because very few people are like you, you can be all alone there too. LMAO, at pretending you're can't be bothered to read a few sentences when you've already spent HOURS reading and typing text orders of magnitude longer than what was posted. So sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:35 PM
1

Nah, if I see a clearly deranged person, it is interesting to see why. It isn't like I did anything special to view the post history. It is a part of Reddit to see other people's post history. It isn't some super duper secret private thing. I'm not bothered, I just think it is hilarious that someone could be so sad and still be judging other people. Like you know it is sad yourself, there is no way you don't. I barely post. It has been nearly a month since I've even been here. There has never be…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:31 PM
1

LMAO, you went back through 5 years of my history! That's so sad. I couldn't even get past seeing it saying some of your posts were from 5 hours ago. Noticing someone is posting SO MUCH isn't monitoring anything. I wouldn't have even noticed if it wasn't so abnormal. You also didn't read the actual post. My argument was saying MEN DON'T ENJOY IT. I'm arguing against the men that handwave those cases away. I think TBP is of the opinion that although the physical sensation of the man being raped i…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:21 PM
1

Nah, I'm not monitoring anything. I saw a disturbed individual posting a lot more than others, so I thought "what's up with this person". A quick ten second look showed comments going back HOURS and I was like, OMG I didn't expect this level of crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:14 PM
1

Nah, I'm not the one going crazy. Oh haha, great job wasting your hours "dragging bitches". You're really doing something here "dragging bitches". New Year's isn't even a religious holiday or anything. Sounds like no one wants to spend time with you on New Year's or Eve, which isn't a surprise tbh. This is the typical MO of trolls who get a rise out of trying to make people upset on the Internet btw. They have miserable real lives so this is how they act out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:12 PM
1

You have been posting nonstop butthurt comments FOR HOURS ON NEW YEAR'S DAY. I don't think you're in a position to call anyone else a loser and you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 05:06 PM
2

People who get upset at text on a screen are stupid, men and women. I'd like to see you try this in real life though, where shit actually matters. Otherwise, it is just cowardly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 04:52 PM
1

And the guys calling women 'man haters' are a bit hypocritical It would be hypocritical if men claimed they were feminists or something. I think it is hypocritical for women to go around complaining about misogyny if they are man haters themselves. IME, when accusations of being "man haters" are made, it is in contexts when they are pointing out that the women aren't any better than the people they are shitting on as "misogynists".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 09:53 PM
7

Less than a day since this post was made: https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/rbs2q6/want_to_meet_decent_men_online_write_a_bitchy/, some girl on Tinder showed up in my city with the exact same prompt. She looks exactly like the red leaning men on here would expect her to look like, like comically so. The sad thing is that she is a teacher. I wouldn't be surprised if FDS is over-represented among teachers. The bias against boys starting in primary and secondary education is ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 01:52 AM
1

Her mother adopted Roe's daughter because she was drinking, partying, and doing drugs (also abandoned her). She claims she was tricked, but it was more likely that she was too drugged up to know or care. So her daughter became her adopted sister.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 10:05 PM
5

I never actually read the life story of Jane Roe before. What a ride. False rape accusations (against black men), incest, single motherhood (two after she came out as lesbian but before she recanted her sexuality), her daughter became her sister, switched sides multiple times, left her gf after she had a stroke, supported Ron Paul, etc. What a mess of a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 09:02 PM
1

The only person in my family to do that was literally the dumbest person in our family. Like dropped out of high school dumb. He still got dumped by her. Jeez what a moron. I don't know any friends who did any more than pump and dump single mothers, but if any did commit I'd probably think less of them and probably wouldn't want to be friends for much longer. Ive known acquaintances who did it though. Usually people id never want to associate with anyway. It usually isn't tied to looks. A common…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/19 07:49 PM
1

The world is better off for it
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/19 12:00 PM
4

K, then your pov is odd
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/19 08:35 PM
4

Sex selective abortion has been common throughout human history, many if not most people have not wanted daughters. Today's mindset is the aberration.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/19 08:07 PM
3

Might be outside of the West. True outside of the western world ime. Even mothers know they will be treated better by their sons, assuming they aren't poor or lower class
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/19 07:53 PM
2

I wonder if there's stats on this. Are girls more likely to have deadbeat dads?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/19 07:18 PM
4

She'd prob end up trying to peg you
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/19 07:17 PM
1

No u
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/19 07:06 PM
2

The girl I'm fucking is 26, so yes. I guess im fucking post walls now
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/19 07:02 PM
0

Id push for an abortion, under the guise that I would do the same if it were a son. I'd pretend that I'd end up being a deadbeat dad (might even go that route if I have no sons tbh). If I was forced to have one and raise her, I'd teach her the value of hard work and hopefully have a tradcon daughter. I would want her to be a "pick me" that judges other women. If she does that, I'd raise her in a rather privileged way in the upper middle class life I've built for myself. If she doesn't, I would b…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/19 06:54 PM
2

I mean it's edgy but there's an element of truth to it. Although I'd never publicly ask for a sex selected abortion due to the stigma, I'd definitely be more supportive of one of a daughter or would fight harder against one of a son. I personally would never want a daughter, but publicly say I'm opposed to sex selective abortions because I want other men to have daughters. I just don't want any. Two son's is the perfect situation imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/19 06:48 PM
5

This, it works for women at the expense of the vast majority of men. But they lie about it. So all most men can do is actually be aware of it. Most men are either intentionally misled or in denial. Some give up and just accept it. But that is what the red pill does, it opens your eyes so you can make an informed choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/19 06:33 PM
2

Yea white women (especially the old ones) kind of suck. Still like fucking em tho 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/19 05:25 PM
1

Possibly, I would need to see data on it. But anecdotally, my presumption is yes. Don't a lot of butch lesbians go after femme ones anyway? But it mostly has to do with the participants in the marriage being women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 06:49 AM
1

You clearly missed the gender divide in the numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 06:22 AM
1

I do too, and no one is making any conclusive statements. But the women here can't even fathom that the data says that this may be a feminine issue. They look at it and come up with every excuse in the book just to avoid that point. Bit of projection there.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 06:22 AM
1

At my study abroad location, which was a developing African country, the percentage of women having sex with the local men was around 20%. The percentage hooking up, including with the rest of us fellow Westerners, was at least half. None of the guys, except one dude who had a reputation, had sex with locals (kinda ew) - only with fellow Westerners, so I'd say 20% of us. As far as I know, it was mostly one girl each. None of the guys hooked up with more than 2 girls (as far as I know), many of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 06:15 AM
0

This is not true. I have plenty of "I've never done that before" or "I would not have done that back home" stories of girls from my study abroad and travels. I mean literally the exact same girl at my university acting differently when I knew her freshman year, study abroad junior year, and then back home senior year. Yes, sluts at home will be sluts everywhere because sluts are sluts. But there are non-sluts at home who would slutify in these situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 06:10 AM
0

ie low t dudes
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 05:51 AM
1

It was an analogy to show you your logic was flawed, somehow you still didn't grasp it. The timeframe doesn't matter, there are clearly studies with data. The current state of hetero marriages is recent too. The only reason you want to dismiss them is that you don't like what it has to say. That is your assumption. But that doesn't change the fact, that the divorces are led by women. You can make up all sorts of scenarios, and I predict yours will all favor or excuse women. But at the end of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 05:44 AM
1

k, you tried
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 05:26 AM
1

Like anyone would have been able to tell. Be funnier.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 05:19 AM
1

So better at being taken advantage of (basically better at being a negative thing), thanks for making my point for me. Quite a feminine point of view.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 05:17 AM
1

Nah, it's pretty easy to tell when people are angry and combative pussypants. Sounds like a bit of projection there, ever considered taking a dose of your own medicine? Seems like you need it. Also love that you sidestepped the real argument in order to be snarky - but really, can anyone be surprised?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 05:15 AM
0

They already don't and most likely never will, all men can do is deal with it. Humor is one way.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 05:38 AM
1

Typical.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 05:29 AM
1

Just because there is more for one doesn't mean there isn't enough of the other, which is what you were trying to argue. There's more data points for boats than airplanes due to airplanes being created later, doesn't mean there isn't enough data for airplanes. In this very thread there are literally people who are blaming the higher divorces initiated by women on men. I'm sure if they figure out a way to blame men for high lesbian divorce rates they would do that too.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 05:26 AM
1

No idea, but them both being women probably has a lot to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 05:25 AM
2

So you don't mind them lying as long as it benefits team woman? Typical. If women aren't going to stop pretending, it would be stupid for men to do so - that's just masochistic. We'll stop when your fellow women do. They're the ones who made up the "both genders are the same" argument. Men didn't start that crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 05:20 AM
4

It isn't an echo chamber. College is an echo chamber. You can't even talk about this stuff in "liberal" places without being shamed or ostracized. I've been here a while, even before I was an adult. If I hadn't been able to discuss these things in "manosphere" cultivated places, I wouldn't have had anywhere to talk or think about these things that are generally "socially banned". It doesn't mean anything to you, but it isn't for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 05:14 AM
2

So why didn't he leave?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 05:11 AM
2

Go tell your fellow women we aren't the same - they're the ones trying to shove it down everyone's throats. We're all the same, until men are worse - then women are better. Basically men can only ever be as good as women or worse, never better.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 05:08 AM
3

https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/local-news/denver-health-nurses-suspended-after-opening-body-bag-to-see-mans-genitals Lmao, last week the topic was women fucking dogs. Will this week be the one where we find out women play with big dick dead guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 06:35 PM
1

No Asians either - interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 06:19 PM
1

I am calm sugartits, I'm not the one flying off the handle and starting out by calling things stupid/moronic. The comment I initially responded to did, not everything is about you. Please point out where I said that women are at fault for the majority of divorces. I think there is a reading comprehension issue for you here. The fact remains, it is a female issue even when men are not involved. Why is that so hard to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 06:06 PM
1

You may have read it, it doesn't mean you have understood it. Talk about strawman - the discussion here isn't that men are never at fault. But to pretend that it isn't a female issue is stupid - even when no men are involved the issue persists. If Group A mostly didn't walk out on the movie, but a mix of Group A and B did, and Group B mostly walked out on the movie - that says a lot about Group B, not the movie. It isn't a strawman - you literally said men are effing up, continually placing the …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 06:00 PM
1

There is plenty of data, the increased divorced rates among hetero couples are pretty recent too. I love how there has to be all this mental gymnastics if the data doesn't support women are wonderful, but data that paints men as evil are taken at face value. Funny that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 05:57 PM
1

Heterosexual couples rush into commitment too, oftentimes at the behest of the woman. So yeah, I guess that could be one reason, but definitely not exclusive to lesbians and probably not the main reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 05:56 PM
1

Calm down lady. Of course you don't know whose fault it is. But the fact remains, women are more likely to divorce even when no man is involved. So to keep trying to pin it on men, when it is obviously a female issue, is just stupid. Why is that so hard to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 05:55 PM
1

It is cross-cultural, which only further adds to the support. Just look up "lesbian divorce rate". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce_of_same-sex_couples#Divorce_rates
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 09:16 AM
1

That provides no evidence for men lacking the courage to "call time and prefer to goad her into doing it for him", only that women are just more likely to give up/throw in the towel which is also evidenced by lesbians having higher divorce rates. If women do it more even if no men are involved, it seems to me that it says more about the women than it does about the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 09:12 AM
1

Therapy doesn't seem worth it because it is female dominated. I'd rather rant about my problems to my fucking cat. Fortunately I haven't had a reason to rant in a long while.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 08:27 AM
1

Dude, stop blaming your religion. You aren't even a part of it anymore - it's just a copout. Taking personal responsibility for your choices/life has got to be one of the first steps.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 08:09 AM
1

Occupation makes sense because here we work so much that it is a huge part of our lives. Who mentions assets early on? The only assets girls find out are about early on are my car and house - and that's because they see them. I plan on hiding some wealth as long as I can - even through marriage if I can.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 08:06 AM
3

Another one bites the dust.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 07:59 AM
2

Read the post you responded to with "exactly". My "all" statement was hyperbole, which you should have understood, but both of your posts are that the man is to blame rather than the woman. And you don't think you are oversimplifying and only presenting one viewpoint? All I see is you painting a narrative to make the woman look like a victim and the man a villain. Perhaps the man had some reasonable motivations for what he did as well? Maybe the whole story isn't being presented. But the fact re…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 07:49 AM
1

And what is your evidence for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 07:46 AM
3

Here we go again with the "it's all mens' fault". Even lesbian women have a higher rate of divorce. Maybe, just maybe, women aren't perfect and there is a reason for women being more likely to divorce that can't be blamed on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/19 12:30 AM
2

For me it definitely is. At this point I'm pretty convinced that if I have kids and then get divorced I'm just going to be fucked. But my plan is to have a lot of premarital assets that I won't comingle during the marriage. I'll have enough to CoastFI so that I can retire with a reasonable nest egg without being financially ruined if I'm struck by divorce. I have a pretty sizable account right now that technically means I am already at that point, but I'd like to be a little more secure. Of cour…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/19 05:55 PM
3

You're ignoring the point that if guys did that then they'd look down on the men for paying them attention and thinking he wanted to sleep with them. That's what the women are upset about, not getting the attention they feel they are entitled to.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 07:18 PM
1

Whether or not I am a man doesn't change the fact that you are more likely to sympathize with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 07:16 PM
2

That is true, all women are gassed up - but ugly women as well. Because women punish ugly men as well. They justify it as ugly men being genetically unfit or whatever. Ugly women get like +2 just for having a vagina, so to be an ugly women they must be truly genetically deficient.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 07:15 PM
1

That's not reading between the lines, that's an assumption with little basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/19 07:14 PM
1

Why is it about young women now? You are making way too many nonsensical assumptions for this to make sense. I know plenty of high n count women who are young themselves, they are looking in their own age group. Yes, they look for younger women - but that is because younger woman/older man is the typical pairing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 04:39 AM
0

That's quite an assumption. High n count men who desire low n count women probably do have more complicated selection processes. They aren't like the schlubs who will just fuck anything and don't care what their partners look/act like, much less their n count. The carnal motivations are applicable to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 04:23 AM
1

Yeah, but from what I have seen women who are sluts (not synonymous with women who love sex) don't always have a ton of good sex. They complain waaaay too much for that to be true. And a lot of women say they'd rather have no sex than bad sex - women just aren't the best judges of which men will be good in bed. So they go for the cast a wide net approach, or overestimate their ability to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 04:09 AM
0

Why do you think it is the least likely?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 04:06 AM
1

But the reason you are arguing for the higher odds of those traits is because you are assuming his motivations and not considering other motivations not influenced by those traits. Not wanting to be with a person who is fucked in the head doesn't mean you are "narcissistic or overly possessive".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 04:01 AM
0

Women who receive attention from ugly men believe the worst and will think they are hitting on them. Ugly men are safer not interacting with ugly women. In general, ugly women are already gassed up because the dating market tilts so heavily in favor of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 04:00 AM
0

That's just your opinion, because you are a woman and more likely to sympathize with women than men. Hers was way more offensive - and she is the one who legitimately believes it. Not surprising that women get excused.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 03:57 AM
1

Or he is searching for a low n woman, who is less likely to be fucked in the head. And because desirability tends to correlate with n count (or ability to get high n count) for men, he is more likely to get that than a low n count, less desirable man is.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 03:55 AM
3

He'll have to work harder actually, because she might wonder what else is out there if the sex is bad. But the effort is more worth it. I have also heard lots of sluts complain about a lot of bad sex. It isn't like sluts can consistently pick out men who are good at sex, so it might be easier to end up better than average for a slut who had a larger pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/19 03:51 AM
4

I don't think he is a great example of masculinity, but I do think he is a useful tool/advocate to use to protect masculinity in an increasingly hostile society. I'll still give him props for destroying the she-beast that was Hillary and her dumbass FEEEMAAALE supporters. I love that he pisses the man hating crowd off.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 06:27 AM
1

I was responding to the female user that you conveniently ignored, I took her argument to the logical conclusion to show how dumb it was. Your beef is with her thinking people are above others, so not sure why you're arguing with me other than the typical "MEN BAD"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 05:44 AM
3

I'm not the one who said people are above others, unsurprisingly it was the woman in the convo.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 05:14 AM
2

Not to women. If men did show interest, especially to the ugly women, they would claim "ugh these ugly men just won't leave me alone, they want me so bad". Women in generally already get gassed up too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 05:07 AM
2

Men who want to be financially are a minority. Not the same for what we are discussing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 05:06 AM
5

Even if they did get bothered they wouldn't complain about it. Read my posts a few back that say they would love to get the attention women complain about.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 05:05 AM
2

It's amazing how gleeful women get when they make men feel bad, and then they turn around and claim to be the empathetic/nice sex. Absolutely ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 05:04 AM
1

Women complain about both getting too much attention and not getting enough. It's stupid. They also complain about attractive men if those men don't treat them exactly how they want to be treated (ie don't act exactly as women want them to, even if it is contrary to their own prerogative). Men complain about one thing, not having hot girls pay them attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 01:23 AM
1

Women have been at the bottom of the totem pole and still haven't learned it. So makes no sense to hold men to a higher standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 01:19 AM
1

Nah, uggo women are the exact same. They just also complain about not getting enough attention. Yeah, same. I wonder why uggos complain about being pumped and dumped/treated like shit. They shouldn't ever be shocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 01:16 AM
5

So what? Women do that even more. My comment is saying that women don't even want ugly men to exist around them, unless apparently it is to feed them attention. "I don't want ugly men to think they can get with me or even try, but I better act like a victim because they don't give me attention and make me feel invisible". jfc pick a lane.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 01:11 AM
5

Yep, I understood that women ask to be left alone and pointed out that they are getting it. I get their viewpoint. I just also get that they want the best of both worlds.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 01:08 AM
5

I was replying to Ugly dudes complain constantly that they are ignored by women, but what they really mean is that they are ignored by pretty women. No, what ugly men mean is that they are ignored by all women. I didn't say ugly women weren't ignored by everyone. And women benefit because they constantly complain about ugly men "bothering" them. At least ugly men are consistent, and don't simultaneously complain that ugly women are ignoring them while also not showing them enough attention. C'mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/19 01:06 AM
5

Yea but ugly men don't complain about being bothered like women do. Women want the best of both worlds. Ugly men would love to be bothered like women are. Women want attention from attractive men and to be ignored by ugly men. Ugly men are ignored by everyone, ugly women included.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 09:48 PM
9

Right, so it sounds like she is getting what she wants and the men are doing what should be done. If she wants a hello, she can initiate the greeting. We've got enough women having their ego blown up, don't need any more.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 07:43 PM
20

Well it makes sense that non ugly men would ignore her and focus on more attractive people. But the women here, really women in general, go on and on about how they just want to be left alone by ugly men. So if ugly men ignore her, aren't they doing her a favor? Sounds like she'd be a victim no matter what.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 07:34 PM
10

I'm not the same person you initially responded to. But the point seems to be it isn't gender based.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 05:40 PM
21

It's the same issue, people being ignored. Accusations of whataboutism are just a lame attempt to sidestep hypocrisy and double standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 05:04 PM
1

My point was I wished that ugly girls wouldnt be so loud and obnoxious, and actually could be ignored easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 05:02 PM
6

No shit
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 04:22 PM
5

Lmao I wish ugly girls would be invisible. Unfortunately they tend to be loud, obnoxious, and take up a lot of space.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 03:45 PM
9

I remember once changing my mind with a girl. And it wasnt even no to sex completely, just a kink. Man, she freaked. First the guilt trip then the silent treatment followed by yelling. The funny thing was, if the genders were reversed it would be seen as pressuring and on the verge of rape. That was coming from an ardent feminist and "men are trash" harpy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 03:35 PM
6

An ugly still has plenty of opportunities to get laid and attention from guys, usually more attractive than herself because of the tilted dating market. They're invisible to alpha men maybe, for most of the time. But even alpha men go dumpster diving once in a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 03:33 PM
1

Women love using these terms as a way to shame men while pretending like they are doing men a favor. "We're just trying to help you by criticizing you all the time!" Another good one is "masculinity so fragile".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 07:31 AM
1

They shouldnt "pump and dump" unless she is into that and is told ahead of time. I agree with most of this, but this part is just wrong. Women by and large do not respond well to direct verbal communication when it comes to sex. There was an old thread here that discussed it with lots of women saying being direct is a turn off. Like they literally said they were about to have sex with a dude until he directly ask her if they were, and she was turned off enough not to. If you tell her "ahead of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 07:29 AM
1

He couldnt get it up lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 06:47 AM
10

Actually, my parents have a great marriage and will probably never divorce. Young men should know that isn't likely anymore. Women have changed a lot - marriage is a shit deal for men now.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 06:46 AM
3

He tried to sleep with two other women and wasnt about it. Crashed and burned. Probably trying to save face.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 06:44 AM
5

It's the classic situation of a guy who didn't have the experience of being a hoe (either due to an inability to do so or just plain bad luck) ending up with a hoe. For most men, that would suck. He missed out on it. Like if he had the chance to be a hoe, would he still miss out on the flattering things about yourself that you mentioned above? Probably not - so he only lost, most likely didn't gain. I know it is hard for women to empathize with this point, so I don't see this going anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 06:41 AM
5

Poor bastard
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 06:29 AM
1

Was he a hoe too, though?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/19 06:21 AM
10

I wouldn't want to be wined and dined by that guy, so it falls apart because there are things women do want men to do that men wouldn't want another guy to do to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/19 06:06 AM
3

A lot of gay bars don't even like straight women intruding in their space, you think they'll like a bunch of straight guys intruding just to score a free drink? This flippant remark is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/19 08:37 PM
1

That's what I said, he was immediately subdued when he confronted the insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 02:52 PM
2

Old men are the worst about it though. Geezers tend to be some of the worst white knighters who will do anything to keep young men down - must be the declining T. It definitely doesn't stop at HS.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 06:51 AM
2

It is an innate response to an insult. A woman laughing at a man is meant to be an insult, and she knows it. In the West, reprisals for insults from women are immediately subdued because they can end very badly for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 06:45 AM
5

Absolutely untrue. It is just rarer for women to bully one on one. Usually when women bully they do it in front of a crowd because they know it hurts more and they risk less reprisal.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/19 06:39 AM
0

Use that enhanced reddit tool or manually hide these posts - done.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/19 03:44 AM
15

Ugh, this society again. Feminists loved to bring them up years ago after some hippie feminist website did a blog on them. Didn't it turn out that their society wasn't even created organically? The society they had was enforced by a more powerful one to keep them weak and to not be a competitor.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 07:30 PM
2

Do you pay income tax on all of your proceeds?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 07:16 PM
1

Russia is an oligarchs paradise.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 07:06 PM
1

Link? Maybe it was a one time thing, but if it is a service, it is supposed to be taxed.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 07:03 PM
1

The cash only pizza place is a business that has to report to the IRS. Yeah, people who work for cash tips skip out on taxes and that's wrong too. Some places hold their workers accountable. But a lot of tips are on credit cards now with a paper trail.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 07:00 PM
1

Here, you pay taxes on your income every year.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 06:00 PM
2

Are you not from the United States? I was clearly referring to income taxes. Do you know how those work? If you make an income, you are supposed to pay tax on it. She is not. What part of that is confusing?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 05:54 PM
2

What do you mean? She received cash, she didn't claim the income she should have.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 05:37 PM
1

She said she does not pay all of her taxes. Same with the one at WSB, except that one didn't pay taxes on any of her sugar baby money. Dodging income taxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 05:28 PM
5

I was reading about some escort on /r/fatfire. I was thinking, it's just another way women get out of paying their fair share to society like they demand men to. She says she pays taxes, but not on all of the income. There was some sugar baby on WSB who bragged about dodging taxes. How many whores don't pay taxes? Probably most. So now they get tax free income while being entitled to things paid for by the taxes of others. Just another wealth transfer from men to women on a societal scale in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 04:20 PM
1

A lot. At work it is like 50/50, maybe even tilted to women at 60/40. My social group is more like 80/20, but those women are people actually worth being friends with - kind of rare. I have had female roommates, which isn't unusual in my city but seems to be unusual in lots of other places. It has never been just a female roommate and me though, that would be stupid. It is only acceptable if there are three people. I studied biology, so again about 40/60 or 30/70 tilted towards women. All of it …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 05:28 AM
1

It'd be good to do something useful with their lives. Their "audit a thot" was a massive fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 05:09 AM
1

The autists at 4chan should be commissioned to doxx them. They've got to have some sort of web presence, they prob don't have lives outside of the internet. I want to know where they get the money from.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 05:03 AM
3

Quite frankly, at this point the West deserves it for inflicting feminism on the human race.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 05:00 AM
1

I've been trying to figure out who these men actually are. Do you have an example of a few (like twitter/insta). Not the Youtuber ones who are probably just doing it for views, but men who actually buy these products for their own gratification? I tried to find them on her twitter/insta, but there are so many trolls and patreon doesn't allow you to see the patrons. In my opinion, these men should be named, shamed, tarred, and feathered.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/19 04:31 AM
1

Because it is normalized and harm caused by women is downplayed.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 12:52 PM
1

It might as well, that rule is enforced pretty harshly here. It doesn't even have to be charged, just talking about it has gotten a lot of posts and threads removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 07:56 AM
1

The rules of the sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 07:50 AM
4

As I'm getting older, the specter of preparing for marriage is rearing its head. I don't want to be married in the next couple of years, but I'm definitely going to get pressured within the next 5. I have built up substantial premarital assets, and I really don't want to lose any of it. I have never been with a girl that earned more than me, and it is unlikely any future wife will. I have been trying to decide if I should buy a house before marriage. I could do so, but then I would either have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 07:47 AM
1

Ah yes, ad hominem. No, I don't care how neurotic you think I sound. Nothing I said was false. Women hitting men is treated as a joke, which was the original premise. Now it is that men aren't confident in their ability to protect themselves against women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 06:45 AM
4

That you're not confident in your ability to protect yourself against a girl? That is not what my post said at all. No shit the vast majority of men have the physical ability to protect themselves against a girl. The point is most won't since society only cares if men hit women, not the reverse. In media and real life, the woman just hits a man - there is no concept of "protecting yourself against a girl". He has to stand there and take it. Every scene of a woman hitting a man has no concept of …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 06:20 AM
5

Dealing with Western men and their loony idea that they are better than everyone else is so frustrating. Like you are getting cucked daily and things are only ever going to get worse for you at this rate. It is like the only thing they have going for them is the belief that they are better than everyone else so they hold on to it for dear life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 06:07 AM
1

No prob sugartits
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 06:01 AM
1

Another one bites the dust.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 06:01 AM
2

This is why I can't give a certain group of homeless men money (I'd say which, but we can't talk about race here - but they are the same group as the overwhelming amount of her audience). I'm very suspicious that they made bad decisions like what her audience does, and at that point I'd just be subsidizing their thirst. Quite frankly, her audience should end up homeless.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 06:00 AM
2

Literally never. Funnily enough, the last girl I was seeing was into the usual rough stuff - but she was also into very rough stuff. Her main complaint about sex was that I always held back and was too afraid to actually hurt her. Nah, not into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 05:55 AM
7

Just because a man or a boy might slap me harder doesn't mean a slap from a woman doesn't hurt. As I said, women love to downplay the harm they can cause. But this is normalization; men shouldn't complain about women slapping them because that means there is something wrong with the man if he does - he's fragile.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 05:44 AM
3

One fuck up and you're gone. Imperfect women want perfection from men. Men are much more lenient with mistakes from women than the reverse. So when a man inevitably makes a mistake, what is described above happens and the woman vilifies the man as a man that has always been bad and she just discovered it - rather than a man who may have done something wrong at one point in time like everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 05:39 AM
5

It has been normalized. Women slapping/hitting men is treated as a joke - both in real life and in fiction. Women frequently try to downplay the harm they cause to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 05:35 AM
0

Invalidation is against the subreddit rules. LMFAO, the mods here are one step away from being as nutty as the ones at /r/askwomen.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 05:24 AM
4

Women just had more incentives to hide it in the past. They now suffer no repercussions for being unethical.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 05:21 AM
1

k
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 10:38 PM
1

Childish.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 10:33 PM
1

It is not a fact any more than saying using machines for labor instead of humans is wrong. Just because you want your opinion to be a fact doesn't mean it is one.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 10:28 PM
1

Your opinions are not fact, it is presumptuous to think so - that's a fact. That would be like saying choosing to own a sewing machine rather than hiring a seamstress is disordered. I don't care what your opinions are, I'm simply stating that you're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 10:16 PM
1

That isn't even the argument, so you are just misrepresenting the case. A whole human person vs a sexbot isn't the comparison. The comparison is a sexbot indistinguishable from a human as a sexual object and a human person who is also only being considered as a sexual object. A sewing machine isn't equal to a human sewer either - but functionally they are equal in the specific task that needs to be performed. That task being the sex an escort provides. I know you are being very judgemental, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 05:40 PM
3

Is it possible for a woman to rape a man? Yes. A woman can both force a man to penetrate her and forcefully penetrate a man. They can also be very manipulative, so it doesn't always have to be about force. Do you feel less “sympathy” for the man if the woman was attractive? No. Attractive women are fucked up in their own way. For example, I would be more fearful of an attractive woman getting her beta orbiters to jump a guy than an ugly girl. Should f-on-m rape be viewed as seriously as any othe…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 05:35 PM
1

Not yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 05:31 PM
1

I see nuance & critical thinking aren't your strong suits.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 04:08 PM
1

I wasn't aware anyone made you the arbiter of what is normal. People replace people with machines all the time, that is literally what our society is trending towards (automation).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 03:47 PM
1

No, because if that was the issue they would care more about emotional infidelity than sexual infidelity like women do. Men care less about emotional infidelities than sexual ones. If a wife just cares more about another man, the cheated partner wouldn't care as much as if she were actually sleeping with him. Men care more about the physical than emotional aspect. So? I wasn't responding to you when I made that first post. You are not the OP, you kind of just butt in. Other people who aren't you…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 03:45 PM
1

Because the aspect the man cares about in the infidelity is physical - he's only worried if she's fucking someone else. If it was strictly emotional but not physical, he would care less and it wouldn't be as bad. Men are more likely to be upset by sexual infidelity. Okay, and they would rather be alone than in a relationship at all (ie with women)? Again, plenty of people on this sub ask the question that if men only want women for sex - why don't they just go gay? Here is one kind of related ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 03:35 PM
1

I only watched a part of it, but the very next sentence was him saying "she no longer worships your dick" and he segues into a discussion about sexless marriage. He's some nobody, but the topic seems to be focused on the physical. His warning seems to be that a man cheating will still love and fuck his woman, a woman cheating will no longer fuck the cheated partner (or will stop eventually). “why don’t you just date women then” First of all, that wasn't some "comeback". You are mischaracterizing…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 03:14 PM
1

I have not seen that, do you have a link? When I have seen families mentioned with regard to women's infidelity it has been along the lines of paternity fraud that could devastate family members outside of the cheated man. Or ruining a man's relationship with his children. Maybe bluepillers believe that it is "emotional" as a way to garner sympathy for women - but they are nuts anyway. If women are providing value that men aren't, then obviously their end of the relationship is superior [at leas…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 02:59 PM
1

I wish women blamed themselves for "women's issues" that they instead blame on "pressure from society".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 02:53 PM
1

This has been discussed numerous times before and even studied. Look up the differences between how men and women view emotional vs physical affairs. Women care more about emotional ones, men care more about physical ones. And they are getting it - otherwise they would go with women since apparently emotional relationships with them are so superior. OPs premise was false.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 02:50 PM
0

Straight men aren't the ones calling women emotionally incompetent. Women could easily have emotional relationships with women and still fuck men. Men apparently want both from women. OPs premise is that men don't provide enough value to women - clearly they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 02:44 PM
1

Cleary they do, you just judge them abnormal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 02:42 PM
3

Also, they are risky - they could give you an STD or rob you. Plus I'm pretty sure my girl would be more upset with me seeing an escort than having a sexbot - obviously both would upset her. But I think I could successfully argue a sexbot isn't cheating since she doesn't mind porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 05:31 AM
3

Yeah, you could marry that woman and then 10 years later she decides she doesn't want to work anymore and wants to be a SAHM. What are you going to do, force her to go to work? I have seen doctors do this - you know, the ones who spend a decade and a half training for that career.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 05:22 AM
2

43.8% of lesbian women and 61.1% of bisexual women have experienced rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner at some point in their lifetime, as opposed to 35% of heterosexual women. 26% of gay men and 37.3% of bisexual men have experienced rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner in their lifetime, in comparison to 29% of heterosexual men. lesbians be violent. You're more likely to experience DV as a straight man than gay, opposite for women. When w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 05:16 AM
5

Well obviously the D. According to my bi friends, a strapon doesn't compare yet. I don't know that answer myself. I mean if men don't bring enough value, why don't women just date each other? Even women who are biologically setup to date women aren't doing extremely hot. This is just my experience, but my gay friends tend to be happier than my lesbian ones. Obviously women aren't bringing as much value as they think they are either.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 05:05 AM
2

So what? Did you read the premise? It is if they are indistinguishable from humans (ie passing the Turing test). Do you know what the Turing test is? They would resemble real women more than a dummy. It is basically successful manipulation, which is what people who manipulate others are trying to achieve.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 04:59 AM
9

That depends on the careers though. Like my teacher mom had to move because my father was a doctor. Why should my dad have to sacrifice his career for her's when her's would limit the family's income cap so much more? When the situations are switched, I have seen men move for their wives when the wives had a higher income potential.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 04:55 AM
9

And this is a big reason why women leave men, yet all you all do is bitch that “women just divorce cuz not haaaaapy!” I love how women try to blame high divorce rates that they initiate on men, but lesbians have higher divorce rates. Women overestimate their own contributions and minimize those of their partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 04:50 AM
6

You can observe the lack of reciprocity outside of women you date by seeing the among friends and their relationships, family members and their relationships, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 04:46 AM
2

Why wouldn't it mean anything? People try to manipulate others to want them as a crude attempt at emulating that programming, so "it doesn't mean anything" doesn't make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 04:41 AM
2

I mean obviously it does to them, what else is the difference? Exactly, they're not retarded so it isn't as simple as " huur duur incels be contradictory".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 03:04 AM
3

Because you could theoretically make the sexbot to actually want you and have sex with you, not even for the money. Can't program a whore to do that. I'm not even an incel and seems pretty simple to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/19 02:42 AM
5

It isn't the only reason, but it is the biggest or most motivating one biologically speaking. That doesn't make us single minded sex beasts, if we were rape would be a waaaay bigger thing. But we still have to hide it for the comfort of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 01:12 AM
1

This was the first fitness model I got: https://www.instagram.com/donsaladino/?utm_source=ig_embed Dunno, still seems a lot less gay and man bodied
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/19 01:09 AM
4

It honestly is funny that women don't want to hear the truth about why most guys are attracted to them, so you have to make stuff up to pass the test. Meanwhile girls making stuff up and hiding the real reasons they want to be with a man is our worst nightmare. Things would be so much easier if we could all just be honest with each other without blowing up our chances.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 11:37 PM
3

Boy Meets World has gotta be the defining one from my childhood
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 11:33 PM
1

ok this is the first male model ig i got in google: https://www.instagram.com/johanneshuebl/?utm_source=ig_embed. And it is way straighter, i'm accosted by so much less half naked manbody and less man grabbing: https://www.instagram.com/p/BtTQAlCnakA/ & https://www.instagram.com/p/BrA1oYlHk9E/ maybe straight women are just less suspicious of gay men, which could explain how so many could even fall in love with them by accident. I don't hear about guys crushing on girls who turned out to be lesbi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 11:28 PM
2

i'm just saying it is weird that he'd hoverhand his own girl but be comfortable with guys. Usually guys who hoverhand girls have their arms at the sides with dudes. if u wanna get all ~cultural~ then thats pretty weak evidence considering that straight middle eastern guys will hold hands and link arms and cuddle each other and shit He was brought up here though right. You prob don't know the immigrant culture, but the gender separation thing is enforced by the family, but dudes here don't link a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 11:12 PM
18

The first is that there are boys who grow up believing that they should believe what girls say Yes, it is drilled into boys' heads that we don't listen to girls enough. No, we listen to them too much. They will say what benefits them at a cost to you - which makes sense from their perspective. Sometimes they also just don't know wtf they are talking about. But boys are continually brought down in today's society to bring girls up, apparently for the sins of their fathers. There's just more suppo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 11:07 PM
2

thats how most couples pose for pictures btw, a guy groping all over a girl is super cheesy aesthetically Oh come on - most couple pics (mine, those i've seen in my life, and even a google search of "couple") have the guy grabbing his woman. Hoverhands are very rare and usually signal something. He might be gay, another possibility is that he just may be uncomfortable touching woman after growing up in a middle eastern culture. Or maybe he's uncomfortable admitting he's gay after growing up like…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 11:02 PM
2

LOL he's hoverhanding her, meanwhile he's got his hands all over this guy: https://www.instagram.com/p/By8ArGhA-AW/. In the few pictures I scrolled by with the two of them, he's not grabbing her in any, she's grabbing him: https://www.instagram.com/p/Bxkc5vZg-H_/ & https://www.instagram.com/p/BxX2V9lgRou maybe I'm just reading too much into it, but def seems like a gay guy after a sugamomma
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/19 10:50 PM
9

She is far more likely to become a single mom rather than a wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 03:34 PM
5

I suspect it is a fake account. I reverse searched her profile picture and ended up here: http://bebiram.com/salliegriffiths2018
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 07:07 AM
1

On our end, it can be very hard to differentiate when a woman is being pestered and when she is playing to be "won over" - especially if you are young and inexperienced. I only dodged it because I was introverted and assumed the former always - but that legitimately cost me chances that I found out about years later. Even in his situation she found him cute later. Women are capricious, it is a lot of pressure for young men to deal with to get it exactly right.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 04:30 AM
6

Well if he wanted what Chad got he should have can Chad Yep, this is what RP says though right? Do your best to be Chad or emulate Chad. They say that the BB deal is a raw deal and they were lied to if they were told it was a viable strategy by society. If that isn't what you think TRP says about the situation, what do you think they say about resolving the BB situation? I agree that the situations are mirrored, but I don't think the given advice is mirrored. Men are told to improve themselves t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 04:20 AM
4

God, I couldn't stand that insufferable know it all old geezer. I hope his "missus" ruins him like his last one.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 03:22 AM
15

Well, yeah - if the next girl is an upgrade, obviously he is going to put in more effort. She probably could have gotten Man 2.0 if she bettered herself instead of just putting it all on him.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 03:18 AM
2

This. Consider the saying "if you can't explain it to your grandma, you don't understand it". Women often don't even understand what they are talking about, they talk just to say words or to feel like they haven't lost an argument. A long drawn out conversation will obfuscate the point of the discussion - it often doesn't have the merit of a thorough conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 01:16 PM
0

Maybe all women are dirt and really only have sex to offer as a saving grace.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 12:41 PM
1

this is bonkers. one of the biggest TRP ideas is that the west should learn with Brazil/latinos, where women are more sincere in their preferences and teach the red pill to their sons. Heck my description of the BR culture even made to one of the most liked posts in PPD in the last purge week. Link? That was PPD, not TRP. You are considering culture and race. In my experience, a lot of TRP did not do this. There is a definite white supremacist undercurrent to it, which wasn't always there.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 09:52 PM
2

Women mostly, even among women who voted for him last time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 09:21 PM
1

is there a supremacy of the western civilization thing? where did you took it from xD? For sure, it is evident here too. I made a thread on it here before. The belief is that the West is better in almost all ways and has nothing to learn from other cultures. Or that other cultures should change themselves to be more like Western cultures (which is dangerous IMO, and would make any pushback against feminism even harder). No, I definitely agree that women have intense racial preferences. But my ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 09:17 PM
2

shes not going after him legally. shes writing the story of HER life Because she knows she is full of shit. She is trying to cause the most damage she can. Her going after him legally could backfire, so she is taking the path where she can hurt him but he has little recourse.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 09:00 PM
6

Fatter women do tend to be more vocal about it. IME they just tend to be louder women in general. But they play the "some guys don't like fat women so I get to be as much of an asshole to men as I want" card. Basically, they feel like their are victims by being fat so they overcompensate on the revenge.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 08:55 PM
1

I disagree with most of the feminist/wk ideas and many of the TRP ones (race being one big one, another being the outright supremacy of Western civilization).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 08:50 PM
3

Uh, yeah. I've lived both and the honest woman was always better. If the truth slips out later, it will always be worse. You can see through the "lies to be nice" and hiding things mentality, so the fact that it is out there but hidden makes it worse. Women lie to men for their own benefit, not for mens'.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 08:45 PM
2

That's just what women tell themselves to justify lies, "oh I'm only lying for his benefit. I'm such a martyr!"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 08:31 PM
1

k
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 08:04 PM
1

Oh wow, you don't know what something is - there's the surprise of a century.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 07:55 PM
1

Sounds good, go tell Brian Banks or the Central Park Five that. Oh wait, the Internet had nothing to do with those two things. Nice try though...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 07:54 PM
1

Mhm sure they do. Again, the rest of it sounds like a personal problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 07:46 PM
3

The concept of benevolent sexism against women should be one. I recall having a conversation here where I asked what benevolent sexism women participate in, and she gave examples of what women typically describe as "emotional labor". So even when women are being the benevolent sexists, they are still the victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 07:43 PM
1

LMAO at how pretentious that is, you aren't as important as you think you are. Responding to a comment doesn't mean you care what the other person thinks. If that isn't true for you, that sounds like a personal problem. Mhm sure, or maybe you want that to be true so you act more like an asshole on your female accounts or take things more personally when you are posting in your female accounts. I don't "accept" things that have been disproved by experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 07:38 PM
1

No one cares whose opinions you value. Sounds like you did. Nope, I learned how people react to people who they think is a man or a woman just based on gender. Apparently that was supposed to be different - it wasn't, end of. I don't give a single fuck if women are less able to handle the treatment men are - that should already be widely known. That wasn't what was being tested for.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 07:30 PM
1

I'd make it so that the birth ratio favored women. To compensate, less (or no) genetic loser men should be born (or be stillbirths). Everybody would be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 07:28 PM
1

No one asked you to care. There are men that are stronger than me, doesn't mean they are the ones who need to change their behavior. That shouldn't be a hard concept to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 07:22 PM
1

I have thought this. Women are not naturally more beautiful than men, advanced civilized cultures just make sure they are (possibly through selective breeding). Look at pictures of primitive tribes or National Geographic. The tribal women are butt ugly. But the point is they tend to be uglier than the men. Like if you took a tribal man and a tribal woman, and then stripped them of their tribal context - it would be much more obvious the woman was from a primitive society than the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 07:10 PM
1

Well that is on the woman. What if I was more sensitive than average, does that mean everyone should change their behavior to suit me? No. The point was that the other party acted the same towards me whether I presented myself as a man or woman. But I do believe women need to have men act nicer towards them or with kid gloves because women just can't handle being treated like men. It is why in general men adopt a softer tone when dealing with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 07:05 PM
1

I was never truly TRP. But a lot of people have knee jerk reactions, and whenever women and their white knights hear an opinion on gender they don't like they tend to lash out by calling others TRP or incels. At best, I am TRP for the purposes of sides on this debate sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 07:02 PM
9

Because they don't share any genetic material with you, so they place their own needs and that of their children above yours. They will rationalize anything to ensure that happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 08:56 PM
15

It is what often happens when you try to turn a ho into a housewife.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 08:54 PM
24

Redditors used to talk about how much worse it was to be a woman online, complete BS. I actively pretended to be a woman on this site for a while - it is no worse than being a man, and if I were sharing nudes or DMs it would honestly be way better. I think women act like assholes here, and confuse the pushback for misogyny. You know that Key and Peele skit, but it would be more like "oh they don't hate me because I'm a woman, they hate me because I'm an asshole". So yeah, that completely removed…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 08:52 PM
10

It is intentional. Women have created all sorts of contradictory social rules and regulations for how men should interact with them to keep men continually guessing, as well as having a way to later punish men if they feel the need to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 08:35 PM
23

I went to college and witnessed all the thottery. It doesn't get any better as they age, as far as I can tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/19 08:33 PM
3

It has happened to me exactly once - she sent me a "FUCK YOU" text, but fortunately I never had to see her in person ever again. I don't know what would have happened if the rejection happened in person. Probably a scene to try and make me look like the bad guy. When I was in high school, I rejected a couple of times. But [normal] women don't usually show anger in those situations from what I have seen, they get sad and so they either start guilt tripping or insidiously try to "ruin the guy's li…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/19 06:37 AM
1

Hindu, Buddhist, or Muslim?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/19 07:26 AM
2

Obesity, education, economic/social status, family issues (single parenthood), health issues, promiscuity, etc. Of course exceptions exist, but for the most part you will run into these issues more with AA women than any other race of women. I believe all of those have been studied at length already - with the possible exception of promiscuity, but I feel like I may have seen an article about that at least once (or maybe it was black males/the entire black community). It is anecdotal, but the wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/19 07:12 AM
0

If the shoe fits.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/19 07:01 AM
4

This will probably get removed soon. For the most part it doesn't, my partners have been diverse. The only exception is African American women. Women with recent immigrant parents from Africa are great though. AA women are just hard to get along with, not to mention all of the other issues. The only AA woman I dated was mixed, and she definitely identified more with her white side (dad wasn't even around).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/19 06:56 AM
6

When did this become a rule? I almost always cuddled with FWBs, that's one of the benefits... The ones you don't cuddle with are sluts when you're hard up or one night stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/19 05:23 AM
1

A never married man is a negative. From my experience, the men who have the highest value when they are older are the ones who had a starter wife who gave them a couple of kids, went through a divorce where the man still came out ahead, and now has a series of girlfriends.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/19 05:17 AM
2

Plenty of women here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/19 04:46 AM
0

Your* Analogies are too complex for you eh? Ah well, one day you'll grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/19 04:46 AM
1

Hmm, I haven't seen this claim much myself. It sounds like trolling. Maybe some links to quotes would help, because right now it sounds like context is missing. Anyway, that claim obviously doesn't make sense. Women have to be actively repressed in societies because they enjoy sex, and even then they rebel and take risks for sex - so they obviously enjoy it. If women didn't exist, there wouldn't be so many sluts around. There are way too many sluts around to be solely attributed whores.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 01:43 AM
2

Women are more dangerous than demons confirmed.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 06:49 PM
1

Don't threaten us with a good time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 06:29 PM
-1

At least you're consistent. And the idea that just because a group made it means it is biased is just stupid. African Americans led the civil rights movement - "must be biased". Pure stupidity. Maybe people believe it because it makes sense. Obviously people who have a problem with it will makes accusations of bias, but that doesn't mean they or right or any less stupid. I'm not even a religious person.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 06:21 PM
7

Bs, look at the way women here talk about the preference for younger women or low n count women. "There must be something wrong with those men, losers, cradle robbers, etc." Women are much more harsh about men having preferences and participate in character assassination once they find a preference they don't approve of. An example is one of the recent threads about n count. "Obviously the men who cared about them must be damaged in some way." Women are so much more judgemental when it comes to …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 06:13 PM
1

It's amazing that n-count is apparently an "obsession" but the way women talk about height isn't. Women care way more about height than men care about n-count. Of course, this involves one of the queens of the "women can do no wrong" crowd.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 06:11 PM
0

This is so dumb. I just said it doesn't matter who wrote them. You aren't debating it because you cant, and want people to take the idea that they are biased for granted. Your opinion is that they are biased, clearly the women who believe them don't think so. Feminism was thought up by women, so that is biased too right?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 06:00 PM
0

Not all creation stories were written by men, just the successful ones. Women who believe in creation stories usually believe the ones written by men rather than the ones written by women. Who they are written by doesn't matter, what matters is who believes them. And that is much more even on gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 05:51 PM
1

Women made up their own creation stories too, some "god is a woman" bullshit - it never really caught on to the same extent because it was such obvious BS, even for a fairy tale.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 05:19 PM
4

Anyone who believes that men care more about the woman being taller needs to get their head checked or, as has been my experience, are quick to blame everything negative on men. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886907002814
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 05:01 PM
3

It's the difference between saying the only people to make it to the NBA are men, and saying a lot of men have failed to make it to the NBA. Of all the advanced civilizations that have survived, all have been patriarchal and none have been matriarchal.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 03:07 AM
2

I've always been a Democrat, even when I was accused of being "trp". I do not like that the Democratic party has been taken over by feminist loons, and I do think that has played a major part in the failures of the D party. They should go to the Greens with the other weirdos.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 04:54 PM
0

It is the whole "any negative aspects of women really mean they are the victims or are the fault of men" trope that is part of our zeitgeist now.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 05:22 AM
1

I remember having this conversation here before. It ended with women describing "toxic femininity" the same way as "emotional labor" is used (ie women are burdened by doing things for men). I think a real life examples were like making cakes for people to be nice or always checking on the emotional wellbeing of men in the office - shit like that. Basically even when women are toxic they are oppressed by men. Fortunately the answers this time around aren't as bad - of course I think it is still m…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 05:08 AM
4

Younger than 30. Yep, first girl I was ever with. She did get clingy, but we were teenagers. She took the breakup months later way better than the slutty girls who I had short relationships with. The slutty ones get nasty and can't leave a relationship without trying to hurt you emotionally. I have never met a low n count woman try to pull the "flirt with another man to make mine jealous" either - every girl I knew who did that was a major slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:30 PM
4

I'm young, but I have yet to meet a slut who wasn't more emotionally needy/wrecked than average.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:23 PM
13

she's less likely to be clingy and emotionally needy Wha? No. High n count women are more likely to need male validation and if they don't get the attention they feel they deserve they go full nutso and try to do stuff like flirting with other men to make their bf jealous. Low n count women tend to be better about being independent.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:07 PM
2

They sure do make a fuss for people who don't care about it much. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slut-shaming#Activism
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 09:03 PM
1

That girl has "cousin marriage face".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 07:18 PM
1

If women didn't care so much then they should shut up about "slut shaming". It wasn't men who made up the "slut-shame" term or who spearheaded the "activism" surrounding it. Honestly, if they didn't care we'd all be much better off and men could have the standards they wanted without getting vilified for them or having to deal with screeching harpies complaining about "slut-shaming". Men don't hold walks or events to shame sluts, it is women who need to do that to complain about mens' standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/19 05:39 PM
1

Well, at least you are consistent and honest. I have always thought most women have that same negative feeling towards masculinity and want it to be away from them [until they need to use it for quick bursts]. I would say most, but way more than are willing to admit it at the least. The problem is those same women don't always have the attitude that you do. In my experience, they'd rather the masculines leave to make the environment nicer for them than create their own environment. As Bill Burr …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/19 06:30 AM
1

Say you and masculine "dude bros" had to share a space/presence. They are fine with your presence, but you are not fine with theirs. Would you leave or ask them to? This is an analogy for deeper social interactions - like if a field were to be dominated by "dude bros", the rational thing would be for you to stay away right? Not to ask the "dude bros" to leave the field to make the field more pleasant for you. Just trying to see if there is an alternative viewpoint to that which is also logically…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/19 06:02 AM
2

This is why pick me girls lose to other women all the time. This is definitely untrue, especially if your definition of "winning" is getting wifed up by a desirable man. They go for the agreeable nice women, not the difficult bitches. Almost all of the agreeable nice women are snatched up by their mid-20s, and usually all that is left are the difficult bitches after that. Agreeable nice women win the game, they only "lose" to other women if they try to compete on slutting around. An agreeable ni…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/19 05:41 AM
2

If she agrees to take his sperm, it is her responsibility not his anymore. I mean, you're saying he totally forfeits rights to what happens to his sperm right? Because the thing to abort involves his sperm, couldn't be done without it - so all of the responsibility, none of the rights for him? You could buy the food, cook it, and physically feed me - it doesn't make you responsible for cleaning up my shit afterwards. Well then, have fun with homemade abortions.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 06:57 PM
1

Lmao that's so tradcon. I mean I want kids, but child free exists. I'm young too, so I'd prefer the experience of having ltrs without the expectation of marriage/kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 06:43 PM
2

Many double standards exist due to biology, so what's your point? If the father doesn't want a baby, he shouldn't have to pay for it. Yes, the child exists but it wouldn't if it were up to him. The person who made that choice against his wishes should assume responsibility for both of them. I think both can be pursued at the same time. This law isn't permanent, once we have that for men we can revisit it. I'm not okay with it til that happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 06:41 PM
1

What is?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 06:32 PM
2

It is the double standard. If a guy has sex, he basically has to accept that if things go wrong and she chooses to keep the baby - he is now responsible with no say. But the women want to ability to pick whether they keep the kid or not. Either they both get to or neither do. Why should one person be able to have sex with a choice in that matter but not the other? I'll support abortion the day financial abortions are possible for kids they wanted aborted but were kept.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 06:27 PM
0

I'd only be okay with nude/webcam (assuming solo) models, basically if she's not in the same room as some skeezy guys - it's good. Lesbian pornstars would actually be preferred. Not ideal, but if she's hot enough I would prob LTR. Wouldn't marry though, or have children with her. That stays the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 06:19 PM
1

Yes, men who decide to sleep with trashy women deserve to get screwed financially for their mistake of a child. My point is both deserve it, but a lot of women seem to think only men should face consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 06:03 PM
1

I explained it since you asked. I agree that it should have been intuitive, so what's your point? Things won't change as long as this dynamic exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 06:01 PM
1

I want only boys, but I want less male children than female children to be born. Too many guys is a problem. Let other men get their daughters slut it up, that's not for me. My family typically has more sons than daughters, so hopefully it works out.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/19 05:59 PM
2

No one is entitled to sex, but women are the gatekeepers to sex and pretty much decide which men have sex and which do not. That is why a lot of women use not having sex as a threat against men. This was recently seen during the abortion debate. I saw so many women going "get ready to never get laid again men because blah blah blah you dont hold the political positions we want you to."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 06:59 AM
1

So you're saying both are acceptable?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 12:23 AM
1

That's like saying god made men stronger than women so we could dominate them into doing whatever we want them to
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/19 12:17 AM
2

I'm not a conservative. But incentives and disincentives are one of the foundations of human behavior. To deny it is pure irrationality. Drug use has other biological addictive incentives. You think being a single mother gives you a dopamine high? Societies without single mother epidemics have existed and currently exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 05:08 PM
1

You know how incentives and disincentives work, yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 04:53 PM
2

Short term vs long term. Those children will have worse lives by perpetuating this broken system.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 04:47 PM
1

Women choose the men that put them in single mother situations. Learn to pick better partners. If you choose to have wild sex with Chad, then the possible consequence of him running out on you while you raise miniChad with no help is your fault and well deserved. You knew from the beginning what kind of man Chad was (or you should have).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 04:12 PM
0

Either way, the woman should have picked a better partner. Men get blamed for picking shitty women all the time, women should be held to the same standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 04:05 PM
2

Yep, but shitty men exist. And if shitty women choose to allow shitty men to put their dicks in them, then they deserve the shitty consequences. It just so happens that shitty men have the biological advantage of running away from this consequence easier than shitty women do. Having to deal with men who run away is another consequence for women. I'm sorry you consider personal responsibility deplorable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 03:58 PM
2

Women choose who they have sex with. If they choose men that don't want to care for a child they share, then they should have to face those consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 03:55 PM
2

Men need to be more responsible with their bodies and choose better women to lay with. Won't happen as long as women hold casual sex hostage. Women here gleefully talk about the advantages they have in casual sex because they "are the choosier sex". They just want all the advantages with none of the disadvantages. It is sick.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 03:25 PM
2

Women decide which men get to have sex. If she decides poorly, she should suffer the consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 03:21 PM
2

Women screech about how they are wonderful for being the ones who decide who get to procreate and who doesn't. Yet they make shitty choices like this. They get massive advantages for being the choosier sex. If they want the advantages of being the gatekeepers of who gets to procreate, they should suffer the disadvantages too.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 03:20 PM
0

Women who choose to have sex with men who turn out to deadbeats do deserve to be punished. Learn to pick better men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 03:17 PM
1

Ahkchually, I need a study confirming that not just your anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 02:51 AM
2

Nope, you have rich countries that don't fulfill that criteria. Rich countries existed prior to feminism. It is not a prerequisite.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 02:34 AM
1

There are some men in the lower class who are more gifted than upper class men, yes. I say that as a man who has been solidly in the upper middle class since I was a teenager. Women are less of threat to upper class men than lower class men are though. Women are given preferential treatment by upper class men. No, present the study. I'll present my sources when I'm at a computer like you asked in another post.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 02:30 AM
1

There have been no studies on this as far as I know. Do you have any studies to show that women are doing the same jobs to the same capabilities men are? Yet feminists present their claim as fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 02:28 AM
1

Read the rest of responses in the thread, I was the only one here saying there were good things about those societies (and defending them from the cliche "those countries suck" comments here). But how is "we won't be like them if we roll back our feminism" a racist thing to say (according to you)? Feminism isn't the only difference. I brought up resources from the very beginning - just that is a huge difference. does not mean we will turn into the Middle East or Africa. This is what you quoted. …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 01:42 AM
2

https://www.comstocksmag.com/commentary/gender-dividend I'd prefer to see the study itself rather than a [possibly biased] article about it. Could be one of those correlation =/ causation things, where more successful companies can afford to have "diversity initiatives" and the diversity itself did not do much. Sorta. I think upper class men know they would have an easier time competing against women than the best of lower class men. Women clamored to be 'given a fair shake' and upper class men …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 01:40 AM
2

This conversation I have had with you. zing But in all honesty, I have nothing more than anecdotes. Do you have data saying they are just as qualified? There's no "proof" either way, but feminists want us to take one argument for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 01:20 AM
6

Basically working towards making the government a sugar daddy for women and their poor choices. Like one example I was recently thinking about was the whole "Warren for student loan forgiveness". On the surface, this sounds good. But student loans are mostly held by women for the dumb choices they make (2/3 are by women). They also take longer to pay it off and I think they take out larger loans in general. A lot of women, IME, already saddle their husbands with this debt and make her problem th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 01:19 AM
1

You didn't practically require two incomes to be a middle class married couple. Men weren't so disadvantaged in custody/divorce. Open thottery wasn't as common. Single motherhood wasn't an epidemic like it is now. Tax dollars weren't wasted on the feminine imperative (paying for the well being of women/single mothers so women could use the government to extract money from men who wouldn't otherwise pay for the choices women made).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 01:15 AM
3

How? I didn't disapprove of ME/Africa like she did, I just said we'd still be different because we were already different in the past without feminism. I might the only person in this thread defending ME/Africa. Also, I didn't use a racial epithet. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 01:10 AM
2

I can enjoy both! But the US doesn't have to be Saudi Arabia to be bereft of feminism. We weren't Saudi Arabia when we were the US without feminism in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 01:03 AM
5

Upper class men pass laws that give advantages to women over men, such as creating quotas for college seats or job positions. These positions will only ever take away from lower class men as upper class men will never give up their own advantages. So they take away from lower class men and give to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 01:01 AM
3

Women are less qualified, that does not mean quotas are needed. Because even with quotas they still complain about a wage gap and the only way they can compete is with a handicap.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 12:59 AM
2

I do not doubt that there is a wage gap (so I do "believe in it"), I doubt that it isn't due to the talent gap. I don't think the wage gap needs to be fixed or that there is anything wrong with having one. Women like to say they produce the same work as men, I think that is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:53 PM
1

A specific example of what?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:49 PM
2

we need quotas and AA because men still discriminate against women I blame men for believing that argument and kowtowing to women. I think you misread my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:48 PM
6

You say "oppression", I say "the natural state of human gender relations". In my opinion, and in history, the modern Western world is the aberration.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:48 PM
3

No, athletes are just one glaring example. You are assuming that women are just as capable as men at work, from experience - I am saying that is not true in general, and that the wage gap is a natural result of the gap in that talent. NBA/WNBA is a just a pure example that is less debatable and obfuscated. No one would legitimately argue that WNBA players are as good as NBA players because it is easier to observe. But even if that is true for office workers, people might not believe there is a d…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:46 PM
6

They will always make that argument, I blame men for believing that shite. We're our own worst enemy for kowtowing to women, yes - that is correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:44 PM
5

My argument is that feminism is a tool of the upper class men to fuck over the men of the lower classes. When men criticize feminism, they definitely criticize the men who try to force it down everyones throat. Why do you think J. Trudeau was so mocked?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:43 PM
2

Bad for the enemies of the monarchy, fine for everyone else. And you can bet your ass the monarchy is propped up by the West to make sure they keep the region stable so the oil can flow to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:40 PM
4

Hun, so do I. I just said I have lived there in the past. "Goat fuckers" is purely a racist dog whistle epithet. Regardless, it doesn't matter. Because the point still stands that a non-feminist West does not mean we will turn into the Middle East or Africa. We have been non-feminist in the past without being ME/Africa.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:35 PM
2

Maybe, just maybe, women are just less talented than men or their labor is worth less to the people they produce it for. Like, hurr durr why is there a wage gap between NBA players and WNBA players? They both play basketball!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:31 PM
4

Oh right, who ever heard of a [ex] Muslim being racist? eyeroll Don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out, hun. Just pointing out that this "we will become like the Africans if we aren't feminist, oh noooooeees" is a logical fallacy and is also racist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:22 PM
5

criticizing the men in power who routinely fuck over the men without power Using feminism against the lower classes is a way the men in power routinely fuck over the men without power. Feminism does not apply to rich men [the same way], agree or disagree?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:19 PM
1

Racist, first of all. Second of all, I do appreciate the West, but I always think it can be improved. What I disagree with is that feminism is an actual improvement. Women want men to believe so, but it isn't actually true [for men]. And the West wasn't always a feminist cesspool, so it isn't like it is either/or. A non-feminist West can exist because it has already existed. Believing we will become ME/Africa just because we return to a non-feminist West is a farce. Even when we weren't feminist…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:16 PM
1

It has worked for thousands of years... Like I said, men get their "urge/procreation sex" from their wives and if they really need their "[Westernized] hot" sex they can go oversees or pay prostitutes. At the end of the day, the situation really isn't that different from men in the West. Western men just think so because they either want to feel superior to non-Western men or they believe the scare tactics women tell them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:10 PM
5

Feminism, due to its close association with the Democratic party, is a constant issue every election. You might think it isn't your problem because it is too far removed, but it is a national issue. If feminist demands pass, it will eventually effect you. It would only not be an issue if feminism was associated with the Green Party or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:07 PM
3

Saudi men definitely have a ton of casual sex, whether it is due to traveling oversees or bringing girls in. But a lot of men in the West now probably won't even ever have sex with one woman consistently, most Saudi men can expect to have at least one wife over their lifetime. The manosphere hates marriage because it is broken in the West, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:03 PM
1

Ok, but I wasn't talking about women there. Her post said "you wouldn't want to live there" as if being directed to men too. And for men, it isn't bad at all. 99% is extreme. There is a pretty good middle class there, far better than the majority of non-Western countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 11:00 PM
4

If you look at the top 10 countries by capita, about 4 actually do fit that description, so... Yes, I know all oil based, but the point is you don't need feminism to have a rich country in the modern age. Singapore is unique because it is rich despite no oil, but I also don't know the gender relations there. I doubt it is a feminist cesspool like Western nations are though. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 10:58 PM
3

I'm talking about for men, not women. Obviously life is worse for women in those societies - but that isn't who I am talking about. Women try to threaten Western men with "oooh, you'll live like non-feminist men in poor countries if feminism disappeared", which is bunk. Men there still have sex, they still have a lot of money and comforts. They still have large families. Unless your comment was solely directed at women. But I thought it was directed at everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 10:54 PM
5

I have lived in those places in the past actually, among many others. It isn't so bad and most people who think so are sheltered Americans who have never even left their own state. The poor conditions are due to economic conditions due to lack of resources or a history of colonialism. Like you might say Saudi Arabia is the most anti-feminist country in the world, but it has one of the highest incomes and standards of living. Yes, it is propped up by oil but that is my point. The economy has noth…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 10:46 PM
8

Are you going to say all this and not even provide us with any juicy stories/examples?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 04:02 AM
3

Why would men act like guys pre 1965 if there are very few women who act like pre 1965 women? There weren't these many sluts/thots like there are now. There is literally no incentive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/19 04:00 AM
5

He has written like this for years. He's just a bumbling old man who thinks he is more intelligent than he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/19 03:38 AM
5

No, but if he's only been able to sleep with diseased sluts I wouldn't consider him a stud either.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 05:12 PM
5

Must have slept with a lot of sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 05:04 PM
3

Things will get much worse for men in the future. Most won't know it until very late in the game.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 05:48 PM
1

The other user mentioned the lump of labor fallacy. One thing that it assumes is that the influx of new laborers will also mean an influx of new consumers, which would increase demand for productivity. But women here were already consumers, we didn't have a sudden influx of new consumers like we do with immigrants. That's why I think it doesn't apply, and the scale is titled with more workers meaning lower wages without the compensation of new consumers.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 05:46 PM
4

On education at least, it definitely is due to feminism. More and more students taking out loans means universities start charging more. Look at the student loan debt difference between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 05:02 PM
3

That attitude is being abandoned by the hikikomori. The report I saw for the female labor participation rate was higher in Japan than the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:42 PM
2

It doesn't sound like you are either tbh Can you show me link talking about it? Cuz what I found only referred to an increasing labor pool and unemployment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:34 PM
2

I'm no economist, but looking that up it only talks about unemployment not wages. Are you sure you're using it right? We're all working more, but for less money. The amount of work to be done hasn't been decreased, which is what it looks like the fallacy is referring to.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:29 PM
1

I recently met a girl off of Bumble who catfished me with good looking pics. And even she expected to be paid for. If I were a man less aware of the thottery of women, I may have given in to the pressure. She couldn't even leave a tip. Like if she bought a second drink she literally would not have been able to pay for it. She was considering it too before I said I needed to get up early tomorrow. When the check came, she didn't know what was going on and said "oh, are we splitting it?" IME a lot…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:24 PM
8

The middle class is working more, but for less money. The increased supply of workers made everyone's labor worth less. Wages have not increased as they should have.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 04:16 PM
6

Remember when we thought more women in the workforce would be beneficial for the economics of the middle class? Oh how naive we were...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/19 03:58 PM
6

Wow, so we've finally gotten to the point where people are advocating for cuckoldry on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/19 07:45 PM
2

Do you agree with the view that women see most men as below average?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 09:04 PM
1

It is the norm for hot women only, any other woman is not entitled to it (even if there are a bunch of losers who would do it). It wasn't outlandish, that's the point - that even non-attractive women expect to be given free stuff these days. But a non-hot woman getting a split bill shouldn't be surprising to her either, right? Only hot women can expect to never split a bill.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 08:36 PM
2

Wut? Men are the ones not sticking around with these women, but are also trying to trap them?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 07:04 PM
2

The more I read about single moms, the gladder I get my mom wasn't dumb/trashy enough to become one. I really dodged one there.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 07:03 PM
1

Do you know how many men I know have in house lawyer positions which are the cushy "less demanding" lawyer positions esp compared to what I do? A bunch. Look at the overall statistics vs your anecdotes. Though I do agree that you've already made up your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 06:55 PM
1

But it isn't just some of them though. In medicine for example, specialties that dominate among women are the less demanding ones. Even in the more demanding specialties, they tend to go part time. In looking up law, it looks like women outnumber men in law school, but are very underrepresented in the demanding big law firms. So more often than not, after they complete training they do not go into those demanding positions. Or even if they do, they drop out and take less demanding positions. If …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 06:45 PM
0

Because the reason they are going into those demanding fields is because they know they can take less demanding specialties/positions within those fields. If those less demanding positions were not available, then a lot of women would choose camming over the traditional demanding positions of medicine/law.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 06:28 PM
1

...wasn't trying to though, just pointing out that your point wasn't well thought out.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 06:20 PM
0

You're talking about the general trend of more women in demanding fields, but there is a caveat to your general trend which is that women in these fields tend to work less hours or are more likely to be part time. I'm not in law, but medicine.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 06:16 PM
1

They all had much higher than the overall average partner count at a young age.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 06:08 PM
0

Even when they go into demanding fields, they tend to work shorter hours, part time, or in easier specialties. Because women go into the fields, more and more men are pushed into the more demanding specialties.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 06:05 PM
2

Not in the Western world.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 06:02 PM
1

young attractive woman and placing myself in the right places at the right times. You don't even have to be an attractive young woman. I met a girl from Bumble who was a year older than me and not very attractive (in person, her photos were above average). At the end of the date, she had the gall to ask "oh are we splitting it?" LMAO, the entitlement. She was not hot enough to be surprised at a split bill. Even ugly girls expect to be given free stuff. But I could definitely see some poor schlub…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 06:00 PM
1

male in my 20s n=12, and only 4 of those were sluts (that I knew of)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 03:40 AM
4

But how many STDs?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/19 03:32 AM
4

It is just a bullshit concept. I remember talking about "benevolent sexism" on a thread here once, and I asked what was the kind of benevolent sexism women did. Some woman came in and described it, but it was exactly as women describe "emotional labor". So basically they use it as a method for the "women can never be wrong and are always victims" gripe. If women participate in benevolent sexism, they are still the victims because they are suffering from emotional labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/19 06:15 AM
0

Yes, it would be if he relied on taxpayer money for that degree. Why wouldn't it be? Using critical thinking isn't hamstering, but I can see why that would be confusing for you. EDIT: to respond to your ninja edit, I believe the poster you responded to was talking about countries where college is free. And a lot of liberal women are advocating for free college and/or student loan forgiveness here (Warren shudder). Considering the gender gap in student loans and competence in paying them back, it…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 04:25 AM
1

refund for every man whose primary and secondary school education While I can kind of see your point, they don't have a choice in primary/secondary school (and the genders are much more even). People who make a decision to go to college make an active decision to do so, and the women outnumber men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 03:50 AM
1

Even if it isn't inherently degrading (and I do believe being penetrated is degrading), a lot of women seem to actively like being degraded during sex as a kink.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/19 03:44 AM
4

The best way to repel sex negative people is to tell them you don't want to be with a sex negative person (as discreetly as you need to). You know, be direct and learn how to communicate.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 04:53 AM
9

And I have autism. There it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 01:36 AM
1

Of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/19 11:23 PM
1

I would make their libido/desire for the opposite sex match men's. Someone else said it before, and it is related, but I would also make it so they had as diverse of an opinion on what is attractive in the opposite sex as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/19 07:09 PM
4

Men weigh appearance more than women do in terms of all traits, but women still care more about appearance overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/19 04:20 AM
0

(which is why i think its pointless to care if a man calls you a slut) It really is. Ironically, it was women who made a big deal out of men calling women sluts. Like why the fuck do you care who/what we call slutty?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 01:00 AM
3

I think he was disputing the notion that sluts are better at sex like they are claimed to be. At best, they are as good as non-slutty women if they both had ltrs. But a lot (not all) of slutty women, especially the lower in class you go, do have hookups with few ltrs. Not so for lower class non-sluts. So at the end of the day, the claimed advantage of sluts being better at sex isn't true and you'd be better off with a non-slut anyway if they are equally as good in bed. A lot of people, especiall…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 12:53 AM
9

Well said. This sub probably has the highest amount of pretentious people per capita on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 12:42 AM
3

When enough young men feel worthless, unneeded, angry and without purpose, scary things can happen, like civil unrest, terrorism, crime spikes etc. We just havent hit a point of critical mass. The most dangerous creation of any society is a man with nothing to lose. The way to neutralize this is to placate and demotivate men by getting them hooked on drugs, entertainment, and "chasing the carrot". Now I'm not saying this is currently being pushed - but this would be the sensible course of action…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 02:20 AM
1

Yeah, even if you have a good living off your IT job you kind of have to hide it. That's what one of my cousins does. He makes 6 figures+ as an IT nerd with lots of remote work, but also has a side hustle as a promoter for some musicians around the city (almost no money, but great for the social scene). He just lets people assume he makes most of his money from the side hustle and doesn't mention his real job much.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 04:17 AM
2

The worst mistake the left has done is letting the feminists take over. They are completely wrecking the left. What should have happened is for them to have fucked off to the Greens with the other loons.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 03:57 AM
27

The cultural zeitgeist is that women are oppressed and men are oppressors. Women admitting to advantages makes them feel less "oppressed", so even if they see advantages they have to restate it in ways that makes those advantages a part of their oppression. Not doing so would disrupt the culture of tilting the scales in favor of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 05:59 AM
1

I'll just leave this here: https://qz.com/1281604/the-richest-women-in-the-world-female-billionaires-mostly-rely-on-inheritance/
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/19 02:20 AM
1

never does literally thinks he is causing her emotional harm when she's disappointed or upset This is an assumption on your part. He never does because he knows he doesn't need to because she doesn't care. "I'll call you tomorrow" is a meme at this point of just being another form of goodbye. It is like saying you're going to an event on Facebook, nobody expects you to do it. Is saying you're going to an event on FB and not going an act of revenge now?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 04:27 AM
1

Where are you getting this definition of revenge? Revenge means intentionally, personally causing harm. That is not what schadenfreude is.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 04:18 AM
2

But even here, I do not see men referring to pumping and dumping as intentionally causing harm to women. At best, they experience schadenfreude if women are inconvenienced by it. That is not the same as a revenge fantasy though.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 04:11 AM
3

Revenge implies they are trying to cause harm. Men do not believe they are causing harm by pumping and dumping. But some women do believe pumping and dumping harms women. Therefore your assumption that men are pursuing revenge is incorrect. You are mixing the mindsets of women and men which is causing this mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 04:04 AM
4

I agree that pumping and dumping doesn't effect women negatively and therefore shouldn't be demonized. I also agree that women are the true, OG pump and dumpers - which fits since women do not care about the emotions of most men. I disagree that it is a revenge fantasy. It is a achievement fantasy, the fantasy of being able to finally have sex without having to pursue or worry about a relationship. What gave you the impression that they sought revenge rather than fulfilling their own desires wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 03:53 AM
1

You have no idea what happened during the years. But for your own situation, if you mistreat a man - you can't be surprised if he turns out to be a "sociopath".
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 03:33 AM
3

Ignore them and maybe they will go away. Nope, it will be like a cockroach infestation - ignore them and the situation gets worse until they take over every inch of the house.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 01:02 AM
1

Status focused, then. They would need to put an income field like the older non-app dating sites did. Too many "directors" making less than 40k.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 12:15 AM
2

Well yeah, she recognizes bitches when she sees em and pays em no mind. She'd make an excellent emoticon of a person saying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 12:14 AM
2

You can't tell with women, they tend to be shit at jokes. Case in point. Again, it was for the poor saps who might have been misled by your BS "joke". Imagine what a "sure thing bitch" one looks like. Bye. LaQuisheshia.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 12:08 AM
1

No one said you should. Doesn't change the fact that they do want that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 12:01 AM
1

You said "I thought there is no gender pay gap" implying there was. Which was inaccurate, so I corrected you. Learn to read. I heard you. I don't care. As no one should.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 12:00 AM
1

Women don't treat other women as disposable, they only treat men as disposable. Tell me something I don't know. And to get it, they want men to change and behave like gay men and lesbian women. It took you a long time, but I guess you're getting it finally.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 11:56 PM
2

You said it was a strawman, it wasn't. Look up what a strawman is, cuz you obviously don't know what it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 11:48 PM
1

Yea, they want straight men to do things they don't want to do and act like women or gay men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 11:47 PM
1

It isn't if you aren't being used as the emotional tampon, it is if you are - you just became the gay bff.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 11:43 PM
1

Well, the slutty ones don't care about a single man's income because they plan to extract money from multiple men no matter how much/little they have. Scaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 11:40 PM
1

Who said otherwise? They want multiple things at once.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 11:37 PM
2

Honestly, I expected it more from Bumble seeing as it is female-focused and run. Plus it is also pretty lame in terms of humor which seems to fit that vibe.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 11:20 PM
1

You were the one who said women didn't want to do it... But they want straight men to do what gay men do when hearing the bitching, which I assume ends with blaming straight men somehow.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 11:16 PM
1

Ok fine, you got me, but I would have thought [that is relevant to them] was obvious (especially since I said "on their terms") - let me know if I need to spell anything else out. As I pointed out, they would be willing to talk about theoretical politics if it was about theoretical feminist politics. They want men to listen them bitching about the difficulty and hassle of it, for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 11:11 PM
1

Do gay guys like talking about "theoretical politics"? Gay guys and women will be on the same page politically far more often than straight men and women. But I believe at one point feminist politics was theoretical. You've lost the point a while back, my guy
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 11:06 PM
1

Yeah, because it wasn't on her terms. The offense was you tried to tell her about a period instead of her telling you. Is that what gay guys do? Hard disagree - they looooove bitching about male politicians
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 11:02 PM
1

Are you over 30 or under 30 Girls want to talk about everything with everyone, but on their terms only
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 10:56 PM
1

If you mean, do they want to talk about sex in general? Yes. Including telling men about their previous partners, which few men like. I do think women want to talk about female things with guys more than they do. They want straight men to care as much as gay men. They call it "period stigma" or whatever, and want men to take more interest in the subject even though most are disgusted by it. The problem is the definition of "too masculine" is always changing and changes conveniently enough to wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 10:49 PM
3

I have literally never talked with any gay friends about the dudes they slept with. That's a girl thing. But the first two are a yes for a large portion of young women. Basically they want the queer guys from Queer Eye. In terms of personality, not looks. They also want men who shit on masculinity in favor of femininity like a lot of gay men and most women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 10:39 PM
2

Neither do I, and that isn't what the original comment thread said.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 10:31 PM
2

Yep, I know plenty of gay men and women and have many in my social circle. I live in a very liberal city.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 10:27 PM
2

You're saying "women make less for the same work" is a strawman? That is literally what women say.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 10:22 PM
2

They want straight men to behave like a) gay men who are attracted to straight women or b) lesbian women with a penis. I do find it funny that the kind of men women claim to want don't seem to be attracted to women in real life - they are attracted to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 10:21 PM
1

I thought you were referring to actual MGTOW who were on Reddit as opposed to a subreddit. But if not, ok. But yeah then your point would have to be necessarily true, like people who talk about cars a lot on Reddit are on /r/cars, but there are cars guys who use reddit that don't talk about cars here so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 08:37 PM
18

I saw this on other subs and they are saying it is an April Fools' joke. But it shouldn't be a surprise. Women are constantly working to weed out guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 08:22 PM
1

Different strokes for different folks, some people need constant vigilance to not relapse. Alcoholism or desire for women doesn't effect everyone the same way. You wouldn't know about the MGTOW who don't complain about women because they aren't as visible [to you] as the ones who do, yes? Likewise, I wouldn't see much of you but see the complaining alcoholics all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 08:20 PM
1

They are useless without political action. They need to have an effect on politics in order to achieve what they want. It should be easier for them if they truly do not want relationships with women, because the greatest tools women have against men in regards to politics is denying them relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 08:15 PM
3

I'm not an alcoholic, but I know [former] alcoholics and they def complain about alcohol being metaphorically shoved down peoples' throats in this society. Ex smokers too, but not as much because tobacco isn't marketed or as much of western culture as drinking. Also, conspiracy implies willful actions to harm men - so it is a mischaracterization. Women aren't part of a conspiracy like they claim about men and the patriarchy - they just behave in their own self interest which is harmful to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 08:11 PM
1

Had to put it out there so some poor person didn't fall for your BS
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 07:48 PM
0

How am I supposed to know that the nice man I married won’t end up being a sociopath in 20 years? Have you ever considered that maybe how you treat him over that 20 years might be why he ends up a sociopath?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 06:42 PM
1

The feminist/female interpretation of the pay gap is that women make less for the same work. That is false. Young women receive more money than young men. As they get older, they do not provide the same work (whether due to previous leave or general incompetence) but expect the same pay. Leave means less experience too, not just less time climbing the corporate ladder due to seniority.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 06:39 PM
3

This society deserved to fail as soon as we moved towards a feminist gynecocracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 03:52 AM
7

This is going to be a case of the frog in the boiling water. Before it was "nothing has changed!", now it is "things have changed, but it doesn't matter!". People are going to keep their heads in the sand pretending there is no problem as it gets worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 03:36 AM
1

Less than male ones - it is in the link.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 03:30 AM
12

This is a bad thing for men. This is a good thing for women - this is exactly what most women want. They do not want a large portion (or maybe even a plurality) of men to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 11:17 PM
3

There's more desperate losers buying porn than ever before. I mean there are so many dumb fucks that twitch streamers and patreon thots are making celebrity money now.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 11:15 PM
10

We have reached a point where many men (~20%) will just die as old virgins, won't even try for prostitutes at a certain point.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 11:04 PM
4

As is "open relationships". They're just dancing around what is truly happening - cuckoldry. Once cuckold becomes an everyday term (edging closer everyday), at least we will be honest about what is happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 10:42 PM
11

The people who are trying to argue have a feminine mindset. It is women who would rather masturbate (or mentally masturbate) to a 10/10 man than have sex with a 5/10 man - or even a 7/10 man. They are projecting a female mindset to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 10:38 PM
12

A 10% difference in the share of men and women not having sex. 80/20 confirmed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 10:34 PM
4

This is how you end up with an Idiocracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 10:32 PM
16

Wut? People are harsher towards male virgins than they have ever been. Nowadays, if you're a male virgin people assume you're an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 10:32 PM
1

Do you take any precautions to not have your trust be abused?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 06:29 AM
2

No, are you? I didn't...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 06:24 AM
3

"Do you have proof regarding the sexual assault case you are making" "dOn'T cOmE rUnInG tO Me wHeN yOu rEaLizE I WaS rIGhT" "k"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 06:11 AM
2

I didn't say I didn't expect it - I said the fact that these women in real life were still less bitchy than the women here is a good thing for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 05:56 AM
1

And I highly doubt a woman would tell a man the child isn't his. Unless she planned on lying to a different man and convince him that he's the father. Otherwise it would make no sense on her part. What, that's an example from real life. She fucked up and fucked a guy she wouldn't want a kid with but also didn't believe in abortion (the South). She had a child by an unwanted baby daddy. He only found out he was the real father cuz of her sister. Plus, court ordered paternity tests can be done. Ye…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 05:54 AM
1

So?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 05:51 AM
6

Being nice is actually a good feeling for some people, believe it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 05:50 AM
2

It is a cruel joke by God that the pill reduces a woman's sex drive but not her bitchiness. We need a bitchiness lowering pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 05:48 AM
1

You misread my post. The mother wants the man to think he isn't the father when he is, because she doesn't want him in her life or the life of the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 05:47 AM
1

This would only apply if the woman is already a cheating sloot. Non-cheaters like this advantage too. They can tell/convince a bio dad they don't approve of that he isn't the father. If he believes her and doesn't pursue it, she won. Can't tell a woman with a baby-wrecked vagina the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 05:40 AM
1

by checking to make sure the kid is yours, because you think your partner may have cheated on you. why are you fighting so hard to avoid admitting this lol You only see it that way because for you, as a woman, that is the only option because you already have certain maternity. It isn't the same for men, you absolutely refuse to see a male point of view. I can see the shared view of being unfairly accused of infidelity - but that isn't the only reason here. What if the man doesn't care if he was …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 05:28 AM
3

Most of the single mothers I know had them young, being an older single mother with a young kid must be hell. Having young kids as an older couple seems to be bad enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:43 AM
1

A couple are. Like the one who has a medical condition and had to settle for moving back in with her parents. But I live in a city where women outnumber men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:41 AM
1

No, it is about making an informed decision on being a father. If I think she cheated, a paternity test saying she was having my kid still wouldn't convince me otherwise - she still could have cheated and have my baby. A paternity test isn't to verify if I was cheated on or not. Paternity tests to check for genetic disorders due to carrier parents is a better reason than cheating. Women use the "cheating" excuse because they fear it can expose willful paternity fraud.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 04:38 AM
5

Women are more likely than men to just give up if they don't get their way. One I knew had given up in her late 20s when she still had a chance. Moved back in with her parents and just amped up the self deprecating jokes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 03:04 AM
8

I know these kinds women in real life, mostly from work because I wouldn't want to know them otherwise. They do stuff like asking if a guy is hot whenever a new hire is made, but it never works out for them. The funniest was when one fell in love (at first sight) with a younger, new hire - and he turned out to be gay. We still laugh about that one. It was still the closest she got. They do act less bitchy/bitter than the women here, so I'll give them that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 02:57 AM
13

I know these kinds of women in real life, mostly from work. They complain about not being in a relationship all the time. They may be fucking hot dudes (it would be surprising if true, because they couldn't even get dates to work functions), but it doesn't keep them from complaining - so they def give a shit. Of course women also just like complaining, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 02:53 AM
1

Yep, it wouldn't be a women's issue if it were...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 02:50 AM
1

If you're at the stage where you are going to have a kid, and the man just wants to verify it - you are already too far into it. You are doing more harm by stoking his fears that he was right to ask you for a paternity test than proving him wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 02:47 AM
2

You only say that because you don't have to worry about your partner committing maternity fraud, ever. No human is infallible. Paternity fraud is too common.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 02:45 AM
1

But you would consider yourself at fault in that situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 02:42 AM
1

Good.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 02:41 AM
1

Do you get the fact that the difference is for your examples both genders have the exact same situations? They can both ask the other to show bank statements, etc. The paternity test is necessarily gender related. You aren't taking into consideration that you can self verify. If men could self verify before the kid was born - this wouldn't be a problem. The issue is you have to wait quite a while after the birth of the child. It is relevant because it isn't all about cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 02:40 AM
4

She should offer to take the test too.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 07:58 PM
1

I get that it's different, but you were the one who tried to flip it on the other gender. There just isn't any gender inverted flip that makes sense, like there isn't for abortion. You asked how how men would feel if they were asked to prove they didn't cheat. They can both prove it. Guys would only have a problem if they had to prove it but the woman didnt. But in this case, the woman already has the proof she needs that she is the mother. She starts off at the finish line. Having a paternity t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 07:47 PM
2

Good for you. I think if it were framed as "let's both get STD tests" or "let's both do blank", most guys would be fine. I mean, the wife could get a maternity test too lmao, but obviously those are useless. It is the lopsided aspect women can't seem to get over. They have an advantage. They may not want the advantage, but they have it. I didn't ask for all my male privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 07:22 PM
2

I guess it doesn't make sense to define graciousness as 100% understanding/zero hurt feelings Probably was thinking more about the women who are like "instant divorce and ruin his relationship with the child". I'm all about women being upset, they're always going to be upset about something
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 07:11 PM
3

Who asked for that tho. Do women ask for "zero hurt feelings" and 100% understanding for the advantages men have? Women don't give a shit about mens' hurt feelings anyway, but men still have to act in ways that is considerate of women. The abortion thing is an example. My feelings would be hurt if I didn't/did want a baby, I still have to do what's best for the woman, dont I?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 07:01 PM
1

No. But I'd ask her to do the same. For the analogy, I guess she could get a maternity test. LMAO. The attempted analogies don't make sense, because few things are as one sided. Not directed towards you specifically. Many analogies have been made.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 06:50 PM
1

So many other women in the other thread think being offended is rational grounds for a divorce. They use a thin veneer of "trust" to disguise it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 06:47 PM
5

You can be sure the baby coming out of your vagina is yours. Considering that privilege, you'd think women would be more gracious to people who don't have that privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 06:42 PM
1

France deserves to be cucked. More immigrants! Change France!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 06:35 PM
1

I feel sorry for the kids of the women here, jfc
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 06:32 PM
1

Mature
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 06:32 PM
5

I'd also do genetic testing for heritable diseases.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 06:30 PM
1

Cuz I'm not, you don't have to be blooper to think evo psych is BS. I'm ex red partly because they relied so heavily on evo psych bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 06:26 PM
0

How about framing it as protecting the rights of the child? Paternity fraud is a thing. If my mother did that shit, I would hate her. I would want to know who my real father was. I'd want to know that the man raising me wasn't my bio dad. And I'd rather not have him be tricked into being my dad. It is a selfish thing to do, and the only person who is sure to benefit is the woman - which is why they do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 06:23 PM
1

LMAO is that a rule in the sidebar? Did I miss a contract I had to sign? People who believe in evo psych typically only believe what supports their own biases. They don't believe things that support the other "side". Super inconsistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 06:12 PM
1

So now we're relying on pop evo psych, lmao. Women have also evolved to seek one type of male for procreation and another for providers according to evo psych. And men have evolved to be polygynous. And men have evolved to confirm their child is theirs, other animals kill the offspring of possible rival males and their new mate. How far do you want to take the evo psych BS?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:59 PM
3

Even if you were wrong and mistakenly thought so?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:52 PM
1

Also, women should never suspect that their husbands would do something like this. TRUST!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:50 PM
1

No, in the topic of relationships. Fine, being too trusting can cause you significant harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:47 PM
3

Being too trusting can also get you killed, can it not?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:46 PM
2

Not at that exact moment. She'd have to have been planning it, the equivalent would be a man planning on another man to seduce his wife as a setup. The basis is different in that a woman actually has the capability of hiding the true parentage. Tell me how a man can do that to a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:36 PM
2

No. If she were mistaken I would actually like to prove myself as much as possible. The more I read these threads, the more I see a gender disconnect on being believed. Women just seem to be entitled to being believed. Whereas men seem to like proof since they are constantly playing defense to prove themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:34 PM
6

The kid could just say that you were wrong right then and there. What's a baby going to do? Say no he's not my bio daddy? But anyway, but parents can abuse a child. Both parents cannot hide the bio parent of their child. The situations are not comparable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:29 PM
1

Yeah, I have nothing to hide. I'd give her my passwords if she wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:23 PM
3

You're a gem.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:22 PM
2

What does it matter? If he is mistaken, he would be mistaken just like in the scenario I gave to you. It is just a BS excuse to try to pin it on trust when it obviously isn't about that. The process in correcting him is more serious because the stakes are higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:19 PM
1

How is that relevant to the situation I am posing regarding broken trust? Why would a ons suspect someone of cheating? There is no cheating on a ons. Obviously it isn't just about trust, but the woman's ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:12 PM
1

Yeah, the stakes are higher with a possible baby. He would still have to "prove" something to regain your trust once it is broken - even if it wasn't his fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:06 PM
2

I guess I wouldn't, but I would love the feeling of vindication. I suppose skepticism isn't hugely worrying to me. I actually like that trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:05 PM
1

Due to a mistake, like you believed he was acting untrustworthy due to dramatic irony, but he objectively wasnt - but still you didn't trust him at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 05:01 PM
4

If you suspect he was cheating one day, but are proven wrong, would you still end the relationship because at one point during the relationship you didn't trust him?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 04:57 PM
2

Yeah but you will always know if your child is yours, he does not. Biology does not make things even here, just like it doesn't for who has abortion rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 04:51 PM
3

People ask if you're tested and clean before having sex tho... I have and girls I've been with have.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 04:49 PM
14

So you would deprive your kid of their bio dad? Mothers are so good at fucking up their childrens' lives for their own ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 04:46 PM
2

Women LOVE being martyrs.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/19 11:51 AM
4

Even "race realists" describe their views like that. People are mostly blind to their own biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 03:09 PM
1

It isn't just disapproval. Women witchhunt and actively try to ruin men with those views now.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 05:58 AM
1

touched a nerve, i see
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 05:51 AM
1

This. Not just credit card debt of course, usually it is student loans. Then a car loan. Women are very good at hiding financial trouble. In my social class it is more of women who don't have savings, so expect to divvy up what men have been saving.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 05:48 AM
1

BFs lived there with me, we had a 7 bedroom house and it wa sjust my mom dad and me lmfao, did he ever fuck your mom?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 05:35 AM
2

80% sure he's a reddish dude From the posts I have seen, no way. It will only exacerbate the Team Woman mod bias further.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 05:16 AM
1

The quality of women isn't great [these days], period.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 05:12 AM
2

You've got it backwards, getting women makes men like women. Read the paper I reference here: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/b2qhs6/is_men_liking_women_more_than_vice_versa_an/. Now you might say, why don't I think it is the other way around. Because the paper also explores the women are wonderful bias most people are brought up with. So, to me, this indicates younger men start out liking women, but the ones who are not chosen grow to dislike them. So, the thesis might be, if…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 05:10 AM
4

Too team woman, will make it even more unbalanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 04:47 AM
5

We need an old mods removal thread too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 04:46 AM
3

what men do or don't do is none of my business Unless it affects women, which is where this all breaks down. Gender relations are not all about dating. If a man is mistrusting of women, that will translate to other areas of life - which women do care about because it can affect them. That is what I am pointing out. But I like that mindset and hope it catches on - men should be able to say "I don't care about the plight of women, I want what is best for me" too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 04:42 AM
0

Beta bucks are bad because they have nothing to offer besides bucks. Older, sexually desirable men often have bucks but also other things. Also, they should be in shape. Beta bucks without bucks is like a homeless person (but not the kind that can scam women into dates - so more like a homeless person who deserves to be homeless).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 04:37 AM
1

Where I got to slut around and she was stuck inside at a work from home job with long hours. Otherwise, I see no point to a non-monogamous relationship. In my life, being non-monogamous and being in a relationship has always been mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 04:31 AM
3

We live in a society. What if a police officer held that view? He doesn't have the option to "just stay away". Women will witch hunt and try to get him fired. There's more to it than this reductionist view. Of course the onus is on men - men shouldn't tear other men down for the benefit of women. We should build each other up and RESTORE THE PATRIARCHY! HURRAH!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 04:27 AM
1

Yea, just desserts.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 04:23 AM
1

In-group bias among women. It definitely does talk about in group bias, literally all you have to do is CTRL+F. Yikes. Poor reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/19 04:22 AM
2

People who say stuff like that usually use the appeal to nature argument or believe in Social Darwinism - which is big now in the pop culture sense. So that type of thinking isn't hard to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 03:08 AM
5

Ok, this sounds all well and good on paper - but doesn't translate to life. Most people like making themselves the hero of their story. If they want the best for themselves at the expense of someone else, they'll convince themselves (and others) that the other party is acting horribly even if they aren't to justify their own actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 02:12 AM
1

You are ignoring the in-group bias. Even if women have sex with men, they still have the inherent in-group bias that men do not have. They have a bias towards their own group even if they have sex with the out-group unlike men. While they may "like" men, it doesn't translate because if a conflict occurs they will still display the bias towards their own group.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 02:07 AM
1

Why shouldn't people be happy they broke up? That sounded like a horrible relationship. But I agree that women don't give a shit about mens' complaints - that has never been the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/19 01:54 AM
1

Haven't you been here long enough to understand that most women don't like sex just to have sex/low libidos? Women here commonly say they'd rather not have sex than have bad sex - very few men say that. Women may like the idea of sex or ideal sex, but by and large don't enjoy just having sex like men do. This has been gone over so many times in this sub I don't even want to waste the time to have to prove it all over again. There have been plenty of threads on it here already. https://www.health…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 03:11 AM
1

What were your search terms? I used provider and settling/settle. Being a provider doesn't mean anything to them and they hate settling. I didn't mean the actual phrase beta traits, I meant examples of beta traits as search terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 02:57 AM
1

That's why I said 'beta traits' for /r/askwomen. You have to do it in a roundabout way. Because they won't readily admit it due to defensiveness about the whole TRP thing on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 02:53 AM
1

Right, women who like sex - but as we know, that isn't a huge portion of women. If a woman doesn't like sex she won't have it and won't like men. Making her have more sex won't make her like men because she dislikes sex. Meanwhile, a man who doesn't like women can have more sex and eventually like women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 02:44 AM
1

If we are going by the strict definitions of empathy (which is commonly interchangeable with sympathy), then neither gender does since neither can truly experience the other's gendered situations personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 02:22 AM
1

Just search "beta" in the box and see what women here have to say about them. Or search for beta traits in like /r/askwomen. It is pretty consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 02:15 AM
1

It isn't about deadbedrooms. Women don't even like spending time with beta men. In what way do you mean women like beta providers? Women like alpha fucks and alpha providers. They tolerate beta providers if they have to settle and absolutely detest beta fucks. Tolerating/settling is not the same as liking. They resent having to tolerate/settle.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 01:56 AM
1

It is more like an inverted bell curve. Young girls are interested in boys, then they grow up and become nasty women. But old ladies seem to be nice enough and seem to like men IME. Maybe the nasty ones just die off or become shut ins in old age - which is prob for the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 01:53 AM
1

If behaving like a beta provider got women to like you, that wouldn't be such a bad deal. The problem is that women don't like beta providers. They resent them. Men do like women for having sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 01:38 AM
1

Signalling towards who and for what reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 01:15 AM
1

Boys are raised to be empathetic to women. They lose that naturally throughout their experiences with women since women aren't exactly easy to empathize with - nor do they return the favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 01:14 AM
1

Not true. Men who get laid a lot display more of a "women are wonderful" bias according to a recent study I was reading: https://rutgerssocialcognitionlab.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/9/7/13979590/rudmangoodwin2004jpsp.pdf. Some people didn't read it and misinterpreted how I summarized it. But basically if a man is getting sex from woman A, B, & C - it doesn't mean he will just be nice to A/B/C and not D/E/F. Instead he will show a bias towards A/B/C/D/E/F/etc. Basically, women as a group benefit from…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 01:12 AM
3

The difference is that if a man has his sexual needs met - he will like women. But that solution doesn't exist for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 01:02 AM
1

You are talking about an individual level, I am talking about a macro level.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 01:00 AM
1

Lol no, wtf are you talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 12:59 AM
1

The women are wonderful bias is stronger for men than for any sort of "men is wonderful bias". It isn't on an individual level, read the paper. What it is saying is that if women as a group have sex with men, then men like them more and show bias towards them. So the men that have their sexual needs met show the "women are wonderful" bias and show them preferential treatment (as a group). Not just individual women, but the whole gender. Read the paper (or at least the discussion in the paper), y…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/19 12:58 AM
3

This is assuming those they desire don't pursue them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 05:38 AM
2

... but shit talking is an action and "what women do"... Yeah, what they actually say might be complete BS, but the action of shit talking is done to display their hatred of men to their listeners. Like don't listen to a woman's words about her ex cuz she's prob lying, but understand the reason she's doing it is to malign his rep or victimize herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 05:31 AM
0

Yeah, easier for women to understand since men take women at face value (at their own peril).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 05:29 AM
3

sluts enjoy and appreciate it Idunno about that, the younger generation especially. Sluts love talking shit about men/masculinity - they hate that they love the D. They love shit talking the men they fuck, not just men they consider losers. It seems like they love sex, but hate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 05:27 AM
1

The other part of this study is that men like women more because of the bonds with their mothers and the fear they have of physical violence from men. Both are things that matter more in early age. I'd have to read the study more thoroughly, but that was one of their findings. This suggests to me that men naturally like women more earlier in life and progressively like women less as time goes on if they can't get the sexual needs met.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 05:11 AM
2

No one's asking for a solution here. But there are plenty of people trying to figure out ways to make men behave better towards women. Knowing this source, and knowing women don't want to make the change to fix it, shows the futility of those other methods which may end up doing more harm than good.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 05:06 AM
0

Oh come on, it is not that obvious. Sluts talk about men a lot, but not always in pleasant ways. They shit talk men a lot. Meanwhile, the chaste, prudish women are quieter so even though they may hate men more, they don't make it known. Outside of PPD and /r/trufemcels of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 05:04 AM
3

I've heard a lot of women say that the whole dating game/gender relations thing isn't a zero-sum game. It definitely is. And one side is winning by a landslide at the moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 04:47 AM
1

You left out the beginning parts of those which included: Other experiments[which?] Another experiment[which?] Basically the two parts you quoted are the ones without citation in the article... quite a coincidence. Actually the second one had a citation - reading now. Meanwhile, parts like: This research found that while both women and men have more favorable views of women, women's in-group biases were 4.5 times stronger Had links/citations. But still, I see this one study among the many for th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 12:13 AM
2

She and I know the exact number (for the other girl as well) - or rather she gave me an exact number. But I like to be vague on this forum, I don't trust the doxxers here. Vindictive women like to ruin lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 11:46 PM
-1

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=women+are+wonderful+study
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 11:42 PM
5

Can you quote what you are referring to? Women show more in-group bias than men. Women are a bigger source of the women are wonderful effect than men. Comments like this and the whole thread really say women are just horrible to women: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/b1uf14/why_do_women_tend_to_have_lower_selfsteem_about/eio6n67/. Of course, I will readily concede that the women on PPD just have no idea what they are talking about and aren't a good source.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 11:40 PM
4

It challenges the 'women are wonderful' mindset most people have.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 08:16 PM
3

But it has nothing to do with the woman, they would fuck a disembodied vagina if they could. I do think that women are luckier and have that advantage. It is the women who say that is valueless. If you're trying to convince me ugly women have it better off, no need - that is already my opinion. Ugly women have it easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/19 02:55 AM
10

Current partner has less than 10. Last FWB had 15-20, which was one of the main contributing factors in me not wanting anything more.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 10:35 PM
1

Men fuck ugly women all the time, horniness is a powerful thing. Just like a woman fucking a rich, ugly man doesn't suddenly make him not ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 10:32 PM
3

I think the amount of ugly women isn't negligible, just the amount of women that are actually treated as ugly. The low standards of men make it so ugly women aren't treated all that differently from average women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 10:13 PM
1

In height preference studies he's conducted, Stulp says it appears that women -- and not men -- are driving the desire for a taller partner. He explains that men don't care much or only slightly care if a woman is shorter than they are, but women really do prefer a taller mate. Amazingly, the actual study is linked by the news article. https://www.nbcnews.com/healthmain/yep-we-really-do-care-about-how-tall-he-or-1B8006259 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054186 …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 09:19 PM
2

Which makes the existence of ugly women so much more objectionable. It is way harder for a woman to be ugly than a man. Just like it is way harder for a man to be weak[er than a woman].
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 09:15 PM
-1

no u Calm down guy - but yes, in the sexual market, that is true. Maybe replace world with sexual market if that bothers you so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 09:14 PM
2

This is the natural result of some people (outside of PPD) trying to say the preference for non-promiscuous women is sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 05:56 PM
0

If they don't hold women to the same standard (and most bi women don't) - it is sexist. But there is nothing wrong with being sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 05:53 PM
2

Same goes for beautiful women. We percieve them as genetically superior although they necessarily aren't. All that matters for a woman's genetics is her looks. A short man may be more intelligent or successful than a tall man - of course, a smart, successful tall man is the best. For example, short men may still be the Zuckerbergs or Bezos of the world. What use is an ugly woman? In fact, she may be actively be harming the gene pool by passing on her subpar genes. Even a smart, ugly woman is pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 05:32 PM
1

Do you believe the women who "drop out" are better for feminism or not? Seems like a lot of the "power" complaints from women come from being wives and mothers, which impede their ability to be more successful academically/occupationally/politically. So why aren't there more powerful women who have "dropped out"? In my view, if they are flourishing, they should have no problem upending the "patriarchy".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/19 02:39 PM
3

They can often be very malicious while claiming to be "friends" - apparently not different to how they treat women as said in another thread today. Female "friend" cockblocks are very real.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 09:59 PM
7

If that were true, and men actually should value female friendship as much as you claim, this debate wouldn't even be necessary. Men would crave female friendship like they do sex. Female friends don't provide the level of intimacy to men that you claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 08:45 PM
7

She can't lose something she never had - it was never a real friendship. And the loss of the possibility of sex matters more to him than the faux-friendship. You know how women say they don't value the advantage they have in getting sex? Try to use that feeling here to empathize with how the man feels. Women overestimate the value of their friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 08:38 PM
6

It doesn't sound like it was a real friendship though, just like the guy doesn't have a real chance of sleeping with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 08:28 PM
3

The current mod team is way too heavily "team woman" for this place to function appropriately. I left this place for a couple of years and saw the change, I knew something was up once I saw the names on the mod list.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 07:55 PM
2

No one here does - that's why it depends, and the answer changes on the situation. If he did fuck, it's a go. If he didn't, it's a no.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 05:39 PM
1

Typically that happens when ex was the initiator of the break up or cheated or did something similar. Break up/cheating can act as a catalyst, but the reaction is always moving forward - the rate may be different for each woman, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 05:31 PM
1

I'm assuming they boned back in the day discretely? I don't know if he missed out on her best years completely... But if I had a full life too (including bio sons), I'd be down. He may have come out ahead by not having to support her most demanding and expensive days. Otherwise, no need for marriage but still fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 05:28 PM
6

It is just the same cycle over and over again: their current partner is the "best", then they lose attraction when someone better makes an appearance, suddenly the ex becomes the "worst", and the new partner becomes the "best" so the cycle can continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 05:08 PM
5

No, but I have quite a few female friends as well as tons of social media female "friends". The women use social media a lot and it is a deluge of "yaaas grl" and "u so pretty" posts. So they must do what you say in person and their online persona is uber-female friendly. I've seen cattiness, but they are quick to point out "that bitch" ain't their friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:58 PM
3

female friends all the time who playfully run down each other's appearance to keep it "real" and most insidiously, to keep her beneath herself Don't female friends constantly do the "you're so pretty" thing (literally every social media post)? This sounds more like female competitors than female friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:51 PM
1

k
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:48 PM
1

Do you understand "I made it personal after you did"? At that point it wasn't even civil anymore, so what did it matter? I agree with OP. Oh, excellent use of a CMV then.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:45 PM
10

Because they aren't interested in their "male counterpart" and instead constantly seek someone both better than them and better than their last partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:45 PM
1

Stop being triggered by a "ninja edit". That wasn't even intentional, how was I supposed to know you would view the response in under a minute? That's not a rational expectation. A review shows we both edited responses (just made another one here), who cares? I made it personal after you (since you seem to have a habit of judging others here arbitrarily), and at that it was just to explain why I knew in my response. "Triggered" almost universally is associated with shrill responses. For example,…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:37 PM
1

k
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:26 PM
1

An incorrect observation at best, especially since I'm not triggered. I would have made it personal if so. Also, "observations" and ad homs aren't mutually exclusive...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:26 PM
1

Sounds like a personal problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:25 PM
1

I presented my argument, you responded with ad hominems - so yeah, debate ended poorly on one side.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:24 PM
1

I know (thanks for womansplaining), I often don't find you convincing so that hardly changes, but this is a debate sub to present other views to comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:22 PM
1

That actually is less accurate because in the macro sense there is more diversity of opinion than simply looking at an individual. No preference is "unique", there's simply too many people and humans are just too similar. Says you, because that's what you want to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:15 PM
2

Believing that an outside observer understands the root of a preference better than the person who holds them is presumptuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:12 PM
2

Mistaking preferences for fears isn't accurate. Accusing people of being of being insecure is meant to shame, whether the recipient is offended or not is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:08 PM
6

What they mean is this: This is where you are oversimplifying. People, mostly women, will call men insecure for not even wanting promiscuous women. They call men insecure for choices they make for their own lives, not trying to control others'. The standard for calling men "insecure" is a lot lower than being "testerical".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:55 AM
5

Men are shamed/punished more for insecurities. They are also shamed, mostly by women, for being "over"confident. It really is a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/19 04:50 AM
2

Easier to manipulate probably. Finance guys may make more money, but they typically have more confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 11:14 PM
1

Insecure
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/19 11:00 PM
1

Meh, women still prefer gay guys while men prefer straight women instead of lesbians. This isn't one of those, "same on both sides" things.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 12:19 AM
2

Messy cars are disgusting, much more than a messy house because it is a mess in an enclosed small space. My new coworker has a messy car - and actually offered coworkers a ride before we knew the state it was in. I lost all respect for him that day.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/19 12:00 AM
1

That guy is way too easily insulted. Don't tell him an internet stranger said that, he'd probably be insulted.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 11:45 PM
1

Too easy. You'd be surprised out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 11:44 PM
2

Schadenfreude, I would assume
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 03:52 AM
1

I think it is more accurate to say almost all 20 year old women are treated as if they are attractive, even if they aren't, due to enormous SMV young women hold.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 03:48 AM
6

Nah, they're conniving and tend to be especially man hating. Pro cock blockers. Average but quiet is best IME.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 03:32 AM
2

bro with a vag and tits No? A masculine acting girl with male hobbies isn't the desire of most straight men, maybe a niche. My bros get tail, I don't want to wife a similarly slutty woman. And women with the fashion sense and grooming of the typical bro can't be good.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 03:24 AM
1

If they buy a Corolla, it pretty much does magically keep working even with poor maintenance. Basic bitches sure do love Jettas and Grand Cherokees though...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 03:18 AM
1

Men before they move in with women still have a female companion. Marriage doesn't change a man's "natural inclination".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 03:16 AM
1

But did nagging work better or worse? I think the vast majority of men would have a better response to one than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 12:51 AM
1

My point is most men are not going to keep at it even if you use sex as a reward. If sex won't work on a man, then nagging definitely won't. If a woman encounters this situation, she should accept a total loss and nagging is just futile - if not stupid. someone isn’t naturally inclined Again, what supports your idea that men "aren't naturally" inclined if they are inclined to do so before marriage but not after as the women here have stated? Single men and married men aren't different species. E…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 12:42 AM
1

What other strategies? You're telling me my stated strategy of sex for chores would be so inefficient that she would have to turn to nagging in the hopes that that works better? That is your view of the issue, but how do you know you're right? The point has been made that men are "set up" to care before marriage. So clearly it isn't an intrinsic feature of being a man. Obviously it is If things change only after marriage (according to Texas), I think that contradicts your thesis of men not offer…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 12:36 AM
0

I'm talking about the most effective method to change their partner's behavior, which is the aim of nagging. Leaving isn't a way to do that, it is a way to avoid that challenge. But still, there is a gulf of effective options between leaving and nagging.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 12:23 AM
0

But do you at least see how nagging is so inefficient that it is ludicrous that people turn to it and expect it to work? If their priority was to actually solve the problem, they would pick more effective methods. Maybe not always the most effective (sex), but more effective ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 12:21 AM
1

And who would hurt more? So then men would have an incentive to change (far more incentive than nagging provides) to attract women. As I read more of your responses, I feel like women have no one to blame but themselves for the predicament they find themselves in. I mean women definitely know how to incentivize men - if they were so concerned with changing the man, they would just give blowjobs to train him in a Pavlovian way. That would be far more effective than nagging. In some ways, I do thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 12:10 AM
1

Then better to discover that incompatibility early on. If the woman has to resort to nagging and still marries him, it is her choice and she knows what she is marrying into. She can hope that he changes, but if he refuses, then her choice is on her.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/19 12:06 AM
1

Is he forcing her to do it? If she dislikes doing it more than a dirty house, then she can stop. And if he likes a clean house more than having to clean, he'll pick up the slack. It must be a gradual process of increasing amount of slacking, so if women stood up for themselves earlier they wouldn't find themselves in that position years later - nip it in the bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 10:25 PM
1

Great strike, keep it going, much progress being made All the women whining here should def join it then if they don't mind the consequences
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 10:22 PM
1

But do they return to their previous state after a divorce? Do older single men have the same decline if they stay bachelors? It's no secret old people start to give less of a fuck, so I would like to know how we know it isn't an age thing. Eagerly awaiting that source. Again, maybe women should just strike if they hate it so much. I think they'd be more upset with the consequences than the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 09:18 PM
3

Also, men and women seem to have different standards for how much housework actually needs to be done and men would probably be fine with a dirtier house if it meant less work for their wives. If wives have a higher standard for how they want to live, then it makes sense they pay the work premium to have that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 09:09 PM
1

Link to source?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 09:00 PM
1

Self reported?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 08:59 PM
2

But that's my suspicion, that these studies ignore the masculine chores that women ignore and the numbers are tilted. Maybe women should strike and stop doing the cleaning. I think it would have less of an effect than they think it will. I believe child care should be shared, but it isn't always practical. My father was a physician so he wasn't physically capable of sharing that burden. And if he tried our family would have to sacrifice a higher income. Not worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 08:51 PM
1

You're comparing one activity to another. Comparing one group to the other, I bet it's a wash.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 08:41 PM
9

It's funny that the kind of men women seem to want are only interested in other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 08:40 PM
2

They also tend to drive less demanding cars, because they have lower standards for cars. I know a girl who went 80k miles on a Corolla without changing the oil. The workhorse kept on going fine. Can't do that with a German car.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 08:37 PM
2

What's the time value. Just because you're mowing once a week doesn't mean it takes the same amount of time as cleaning the dishes. Add up the time for the daily tasks and it probably ends up the same as the weekly tasks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 08:35 PM
1

How did the goal posts move from mowing lawns to fixing pipes? Wasn't it mowing lawns with your initial response? How hard is it to figure out how to mow a lawn?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 08:29 PM
0

Nah I can admit when I'm wrong, just not when I'm right
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 08:28 PM
1

Rain still makes a car look dirty, it leaves streaks. Plus if there is dust around the dust accumulates. And if there are puddles afterwards on the roads? Sheesh. I'd rather keep it in the garage when it rains.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 08:26 PM
1

Women desire a Chad for everything besides beta bucks. And even then, they would only prefer a beta for bucks if the beta is easier to control (typically the case). There just aren't enough Chads so they settle.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:45 PM
1

Where does optimization end and quality of life begin. Just because I'm better at doing things shouldn't mean I should be the one to do all of the hard things I'm better at. If that was the case, maybe women do the cleaning/cooking chores because they are faster/better at them. If true, case closed.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:36 PM
1

Good one Ahem /S
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:24 PM
1

Men and women have different standards, so what you deem necessary may not seem that way to a male partner. That's the crux of the argument on nagging, men and women having different priorities and women trying to force men to adhere to theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:24 PM
1

19 upvotes, zero comments Sounds about right Gross
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:21 PM
1

SArCaSM iS My fIRsT LaNgUAge
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:19 PM
2

Your car probably does show that you don't give a fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:17 PM
3

Most likely a low value car
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:15 PM
2

That's gross
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:12 PM
1

Ya probs
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:12 PM
2

That's your mom, not most women. I disagree, unless you are absolutely trashing your house, cleaning it weekly should be way easier than home maintenance. Cooking should be shared, but I feel that way because nutrition is important for fitness and most women can't judge macros correctly for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:11 PM
1

Only have to have one generation do it to keep it rolling. My dad paid for his with the condo he inherited, due to rising prices. I can afford my own, but would rather have dad's in old age due to sentimental reasons. Assuming I don't move.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:07 PM
0

I like a shiny car, so sue me. I don't drive beaters so I don't like driving around with a dirty car. People who care about their cars wash it once a week. And if you have a black car but don't wash it once a week, that's pretty much car abuse. There are people on /r/cars who wash it once a day. I won't be on that schedule til I retire.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 07:03 PM
0

But again, the women here are just latching on to one example because they can be like "it doesn't happen often enough". I wash my car weekly. Lawn needs to be mowed weekly. Today the pipes burst, tomorrow the shower head breaks, then there's something wrong with the kitchen sink. Home maintenance can easily be on a [bi]weekly basis, especially for middle class people with big, older homes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:56 PM
5

Right, they have a higher standard for their shared home and want the other party to adhere to it - which will inevitably lead to conflict. My grandfather and father both kept a separate 1 bedroom condo they could use as their personal man cave to retreat to, but not everyone can afford it. G/mom just had to keep the shared house clean. I'll prob do the same. But for men with a spine, they can't just be nagged into adhering to standards they don't have.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:53 PM
1

Push or riding mower?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:42 PM
-1

Easier than having personal accountability, I suppose...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:41 PM
1

Whether they call it that or not, it still is something outside observers may see as nagging. I think women are less compromising and expect others to adhere to their standard, while guys don't care if someone else's standards are lower than their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:41 PM
2

Sounds like a personal problem...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:38 PM
-2

That's just one example. Washing cars is a weekly chore. I meal prep at the beginning of every week. Some people just make things harder than they need to be. Laundry is once a week. Cleaning can be done once a week until you have kids, but having a clean home with young kids is futile and they should have cleaning chores once they grow older.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:37 PM
5

Why should a man have to ask if you are capable of it? I thought women were so proactive about chores...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:35 PM
7

Wut? I live in the south and have dealt with burst pipes last winter. When the shower head broke, I was the one expected to fix it, etc. I definitely see a lot less women contribute to these kinds of chores, both in my family and neighborhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:33 PM
8

I just searched /r/gaybros and /r/actuallesbians for 'chores', and the latter definitely had more hits complaining than the former. This jives with my anecdotal experience that a lot of women can't help but nag their partner no matter who they are with. While guys are more chill about this stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:30 PM
9

Why is that only cooking/cleaning/laundry are the only things that seem to count as chores that need to be shared? I hardly ever saw women mowing the lawn, washing the cars, or fixing the pipes. Whenever the conversation of household tasks come up, women seem to only want to talk about things that are traditionally feminine rather than masculine. These chores hardly ever come up here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 06:21 PM
1

That doesn't answer the question on whether women improve their appearance for men or themselves. What you say isn't true, even fat, ugly women have options and are treated as desirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/19 11:45 PM
1

You're saying you'd walk around like that if you were asexual? Or a lesbian? No, women spend more to look good because they don't like how they look or judgement from other women. Women are harsher on looks for both genders than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 07:11 PM
1

Ugly women get paid for too, as do bitchy hot women. You have to be ugly AND bitchy to be left out, even then it isn't super uncommon.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 07:09 PM
1

feelings mutual
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 03:35 PM
2

I know a couple like that, because I went to a party school. But that is just among the upper middle class. I don't have any lower class friends, but I would bet the proportion is higher there.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 03:22 PM
5

Single women already outearn single men - if what you are saying is true, it just shows they place even more of the financial burden on men than expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 03:02 PM
1

Then it is two guys spending a lot for blowjobs, not one party spending more than the other party.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 03:01 PM
4

In college and early 20s? They def do, I've been asked twice and I know female friends who have asked too.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 03:00 PM
5

"Just change your sexual orientation" - yeah, good advice. Shows your bad faith argument. I'd rather women just be able to not treat straight guys like shit/piggybanks. But I guess that is asking too much of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 02:58 PM
4

Gay guys may want to put in as much money as women do because of shared interests, but they are not expected to or need to. A schlubby gay guy will still date and get laid very easily, a schlubby straight guy is mostly SOL. Ask a schlubby bi guy who is easier to date, this routinely comes up in Reddit's - "hey bi guys, who is easier" threads that can be easily looked up. Either way, the easier access to sex without needing to date traditionally still makes gay sex/love life way cheaper.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 06:39 AM
4

You're right, it is pointless, so then maybe you should leave instead of complaining about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 06:19 AM
9

What's the source on any of OP's claims? Are there a ton of peer reviewed studies on dating costs?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 06:12 AM
11

Your post was about the "average woman" using your own words. You're speaking about generalities and then moving the goalposts. On average, hetero men pay more than hetero women. I don't know for sure since these aren't my communities, but I would bet gay guys spend less than hetero guys and lesbian women pay about the same as hetero women (maybe a little less, but not as significant).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 06:00 AM
20

Let me ask you this, do you think asexual women or lesbian women would have similar costs (the vast majority comes from the looks based costs anyway)? The only thing that I think that is completely exclusive to hetero women is pregnancy tests - which women ask to split with men anyway (if they even remember/know who the possible father might be). I've heard of girls using BC to stop periods/acne. Being a gay guy and dating is probably way cheaper than being a hetero guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 05:18 AM
7

The figures for the first are probably so fringe they are pretty much negligible. Owning an alpha is the ideal, they settle for sharing an alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 06:51 PM
1

She sacrifices them for her children, her husband, her own desire to be a mother - she's not stupid, either, she knows there's a chance that her new body will be a turn off to her husband jfc women are such martyrs
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 03:42 AM
1

k
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/19 03:53 AM
2

Most women will never have a one night stand or fuck a stranger. Most women will not admit to those things, you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 04:36 AM
0

Nah, they say it because they want to preserve their dumb delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 04:02 AM
0

Mhm sure, I'm sure he's broken up over it and won't be able to just move on to the next one. Sucks for your revenge fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/19 04:00 AM
1

Mhm, sure. They use their fake relationships to pretend that the troubles in the mens' lives don't exist or are their own faults. "My relationship is great! Your's sucks because you suck." Nah, maybe a bit of projection there - as can be seen in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 10:25 PM
3

Look at her boohooing posts. Apparently he got everything he wanted and she didn't. Apparently he didn't want to wife her up, so I don't think her leaving completely would be that much of a loss. She wanted more, he didn't. She isn't entitled to a husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 10:23 PM
2

Didnt you want to marry this guy previously? Women turn on a dime and are very fickle in their relationships with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 08:47 PM
1

This may have been a situation where an entitled woman was put in her place.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 08:45 PM
-1

I wonder what his side of the story is. A lot of the women here pretend men would be lucky to marry them and they would prefer if "men just left them alone". So to have a man who tries his damnedest to not want to marry a woman here - I wonder what's up?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 08:43 PM
5

Women: even when they're in the wrong, they have to act like they were in the right. Jeez what a martyr
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 08:41 PM
2

Some people are honest, some lie to themselves and everyone else. Maybe pick people you don't have to lie about. Women tell lies about their relationships to act like assholes to men here and dismiss their experiences, so it is satisfying to see it blow up in their faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 08:31 PM
0

Every day I thank god I wasn't raised by some single mom failure.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 04:41 PM
1

LMAO, yeah try this when women are rude towards a man who overestimates his looks SMV and has a hard time. God forbid people point out a woman overestimated her commitment SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/19 04:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter