TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

timoppenheimer Archive

View 47 posts and 860 comments by timoppenheimer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
75

Activism/Supporttimoppenheimer/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:34 PM
60

timoppenheimer/r/MensRights30/12/16 05:53 PM
45

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW09/08/16 06:39 PM
28

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW03/09/15 08:57 PM
28

Intactivismtimoppenheimer/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:05 PM
23

Intactivismtimoppenheimer/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:45 PM
20

Discussiontimoppenheimer/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:13 PM
19

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW24/11/18 04:41 AM
18

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW07/03/15 12:15 AM
18

Activism/Supporttimoppenheimer/r/MensRights05/02/17 02:02 AM
18

timoppenheimer/r/MensRights05/12/16 05:22 PM
13

Discussiontimoppenheimer/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:13 PM
13

Questiontimoppenheimer/r/MensRights23/04/15 04:50 AM
10

timoppenheimer/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:39 PM
9

Opiniontimoppenheimer/r/MensRights21/04/15 08:50 PM
8

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW20/04/15 02:55 PM
8

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW23/03/15 04:04 PM
7

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW05/02/15 06:07 PM
6

timoppenheimer/r/MensRights29/04/16 03:44 PM
6

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW31/10/16 03:34 AM
6

Questiontimoppenheimer/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:52 PM
6

Questiontimoppenheimer/r/MensRights15/04/14 09:05 PM
5

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW17/03/15 12:25 AM
5

Intactivismtimoppenheimer/r/MensRights02/04/18 01:26 AM
5

Discussiontimoppenheimer/r/MensRights07/01/15 09:56 PM
4

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW18/11/18 05:37 PM
4

Intactivismtimoppenheimer/r/MensRights04/12/17 09:09 PM
3

timoppenheimer/r/askTRP05/05/14 01:29 PM
3

timoppenheimer/r/MensRights30/10/14 09:35 PM
3

Feminismtimoppenheimer/r/MensRights01/09/16 12:20 AM
3

timoppenheimer/r/MensRights09/03/14 12:29 AM
2

Questiontimoppenheimer/r/MensRights31/03/15 11:19 PM
2

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW24/07/15 07:01 PM
2

timoppenheimer/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:41 PM
2

timoppenheimer/r/MensRights31/10/16 03:35 AM
2

Questiontimoppenheimer/r/MensRights22/10/14 12:03 AM
2

timoppenheimer/r/MensRights08/08/16 03:35 PM
1

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW20/08/15 09:06 PM
1

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW04/12/14 05:14 PM
1

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW31/10/16 03:31 AM
1

timoppenheimer/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:36 PM
0

timoppenheimer/r/MensRights17/11/14 11:41 PM
0

timoppenheimer/r/MensRights05/12/14 04:16 AM
0

timoppenheimer/r/MarriedRedPill13/02/17 12:36 AM
0

timoppenheimer/r/MGTOW16/06/15 01:14 AM
0

timoppenheimer/r/askTRP01/04/14 10:24 PM
0

timoppenheimer/r/MensRights15/04/17 09:16 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Indeed, it will be a mixed bag. She is somewhat traditionalist. But since it's listed on the MGTOW website in the same section as The Manipulated Men, I'd assume there's enough good stuff in there to be worth reading.
/r/MGTOW24/11/18 05:39 PM
2

Self-published. She had all copies, didn't even send them to book sellers except for individual orders, and I can't find a way to contact her. I'm pretty sure she's dead, and was writing under a pseudonym, because she doesn't have an obituary anywhere.
/r/MGTOW24/11/18 05:30 PM
2

She seems to have died. I can't find any contact info on her, and even the places she sold her books say they fell out of contact with her years ago. This is an attempt to digitally publish it.
/r/MGTOW24/11/18 05:28 PM
3

I appreciate your skepticism. Here's why I'm interested: https://www.mgtow.com/book/the-cultural-devastation-of-american-women/ " The Cultural Devastation of American Women is a factual investigation into the American woman’s abuse of liberation. Levant burrows into the psyches and habits of American women. She exposes over-spending, over-decorating, obsessions with beauty, weight, social climbing, and the hiring out of traditional female functions. All of these demonstrate a rejection of biolog…
/r/MGTOW24/11/18 05:27 PM
5

Are you willing and/or able to contribute to this project? I'd love to be able to email you a copy of this book, brother
/r/MGTOW24/11/18 04:56 AM
4

To the extent that they're willing to engage with this strategy, I welcome them, but most women don't get involved in activities like this.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 03:51 PM
4

I'm in the same chat you're in, Luke, and I've seen the same stories about Brother K that you have. They're hearsay, but I've also experienced in my own discussions with K that he is unwilling to talk about strategies that break social taboos, chief among them directly speaking to children with their parents around. Brother K's and other intactivists' refrain that we should go try it out for ourselves is individually perhaps a useful brush-off, but if all the intactivists get that message we are…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:13 AM
1

>fuck it, if they play dirty then I'll also do that There's an interesting Alinsky quote, when confronting Native Americans, saying something like "You think you love your cause? I love it many times more; I am willing to dirty myself to win. Are you willing to sacrifice your morals for your cause?"
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:34 AM
2

EXACTLY.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:30 AM
1

> I agree, but [punishment] is not able to be done either in the present or future. Until it is illegal, nobody can be charged and after it's illegal nobody can be charged for their actions before it became a crime. With all due respect, please consider the case of Bill Cosby. What was once legal became illegal and could be used for post-hoc prosecution because the definition of sexual assault changed. I think an argument could very easily be made that circumcision is sexual assault of an infant…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:28 AM
2

All of the above can be used; 8channers were talking about spamming this in Fortnight servers. Personally, I think that will likely be shut down with chatbots and spam filters, but I think this is a good method for people who don't want even a threat of being doxxed. For me, I'll be doing the shock-and-awe style direct parent-child education. Thanks for considering my arguments. You're the first person I've successfully convinced of my reasoning. Flyering cities works too; I like these cards, pl…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:16 AM
2

> IDK though. Might work if it was literally country-wide and on the same day. BSM is getting some media coverage. This, 100%, is what I'm trying to organize. Based on the amount of pushback I'm currently getting, it's looking (as I suspected) like I'll have to pilot the program to raise interest with a proof-of-concept video, but the idea is to do it big, so that people everywhere are whispering about it. > So lets just argue that we get a sports figure arguing against it. I'm not talking about…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:22 AM
5

The CDC is about to push doctors to lobby parents directly in favor of circumcision, meaning that rates of cutting may be about to spike again. We have not, to this date, pushed this into the public eye in any meaningful way, as the media continues to portray us as a dick-obsessed that can be safely ignored without consequence. My strategy is an attempt to force this into the public eye. No part of current intactivist strategy actually gets us meaningful mainstream news coverage, except with ext…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:05 AM
1

reload my comment; i formatted it badly in the first edit.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:55 AM
2

I messed with your order; I hope you don't mind. isn't that what you would need to do too? I mean gathering a few thousand (any less and a protest is just laughable) people to meet in the same area and just... march... requires lots of coordination and lobbying to ensure a protest like that would be legal. Thank you for the opportunity to clarify my strategy. No, I'm talking about 1 or 2 people in each location randomly showing up to schools or sporting events to protest. This [https://www.youtu…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:52 AM
3

It looks to me like circumcision rates fall over time and then are buoy'ed back up by recommendations from the medical establishment that parents be encouraged to circumcise. It's never fallen particularly fast. The 0.8% drop, year after year, has been going on since the 60's, as far as I can tell, with occasional bumps back upwards. Here's the data (see graph). Since it's across the population, it's not obvious what's causing it. You're right that medicaid funding affects the rate. For reducing…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:27 AM
3

Thank you. Circumcision delenda est. ​ And I wish you the best of luck as well. I hope I don't get in your way.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:12 AM
2

No, just a friend. He's not been feeling well lately, and he wanted someone else to try to take up the baton, at least until he's recovered.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:11 AM
2

I'm not proposing rioting or violence. I'm proposing peacefully attending a little league game and educating children in front of their parents. ​ One of the central problems faced by Intactivism is that the active community is tiny. I speculate that this is because most people who care about this see current methods as ineffective, and they go off to find something else to do with their time. Most of the ideas you propose would only be successful if we could gather a large force to lobby for th…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:09 AM
3

I suspect that lots of young men who are upset about this issue tap out of the public advocacy because it doesn't actually offer them anything. I like my strategy because it has the potential to bring a lot of men back to the table with the promise of tissue regeneration, a possible procedure that will make men whole again with enough government funding. Simply lowering the circumcision rate doesn't offer the victims anything, so the intactivist movement is tiny, likely smaller than 2,000 people…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:43 PM
11

For anyone who wants to get involved with this strategy, here are instructions and a form letter: https://circumcision.org/medicaid-funding-for-circumcision/
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:30 PM
3

Intactivists are currently spread extremely thin across the US. My goal in designing this strategy was to make it scaleable, meaning that individuals or small teams could implement the strategy without major coordination. Unfortunately, most people either don't care or don't think that the current strategies of protesting are effective, so the largest anti-circ protest every year (the Genital Integrity thing in DC) gets fewer than 100 people, as far as I can tell. ​ Also: why would we want to ta…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:20 PM
1

I also view the pace of change more optimistically than you do Do you have a single example of a country where rational debate coupled with a slow decline in the practice led to a point where the issue faced a break-out moment and overcame the natural taboo on the topic? Australia is all the way to 5%, with no such break-out moment having occurred, and now that there are so few victims, no one is interested in talking about it. Britain held the debate in its newly centralized health system, deci…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:13 PM
2

People have protested near kids and their parents and have successfully reached the kids and triggered the parents' anger. But even if we don't reach that many kids, reaching a few pre-puberty and triggering massive numbers of parents is a whole lot scarier to the broader society than the current approach of intactivism, which relies on making more reasoned arguments and stating facts. Are you familiar with the major branches and activities of Intactivism? You keep suggesting ideas that have bee…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 10:30 PM
3

>Protesting at children's events makes you seem like children are your enemy. ​ Non sequitor. The cutter parents are obviously the enemy, and we're letting kids know what their parents have done to them. ​ > Likewise, I think you're likely to find progress on circumcision has a good chance of speeding up if you appeal to arguments people already understand in other domains. ​ Due to the emotional triggers involved in circumcision, this does not work. Stefan Molyneux tried this with Libertarian a…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:58 PM
1

Check out my most recent thread. I propose that we bypass rhetoric and argument, and go directly to educating young children directly in front of their parents at pee wee sports events, schools, and churches. Rational debate and protesting at traditional venues such as hospitals has had no effect for 50 years. If you want to invite feminists to join us, I invite you to do so. I suspect they won't want to help. It's time to leave rhetoric and facts behind, and fight with an emotional gut-punch to…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:28 PM
8

You have the benefit of the moral right on this issue; you don't have to resort to tactics that gain you publicity at the cost of everyone hating you. Less provocative tactics have consistently failed to move the needle on this issue. I would recommend focusing on putting economic pressure on the medical interest groups that benefit from circumcision still being a widely delivered service. They're too big and too well funded. Each circ is worth about $400 for 10-20 minutes of a doctors time. Ver…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:23 PM
1

he thinks a simile is an argument Whew lad.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:06 PM
1

Your rights begin with your right to your body. Without the right to your body, you have no rights. Boys' rights are immediately violated at birth. If you want to leave, leave.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:03 PM
1

The "anti-semitism" argument needs to be consistently met with the statement that it would be anti-semitic to have a religious carve-out that gives a right (body integrity/autonomy/living with your entire body) to everyone except Jewish children.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:02 PM
1

never mention FGM "Never mention the obvious discrimination against men in this area," you mean. Hmmm... I'd never thought about deliberately throwing away a rhetorical weapon based on... no argument, just a claim. Where's my Stefan Molyneux meme folder?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:00 PM
3

I disagree, for the pragmatic reason that giving up male disposability will cost society a great deal and may be impossible given the biases baked into the bio-cake; cutting parts off babies' penises could be halted without costing society at large anything. We should first establish a societal norm for respecting men's ownership over their bodies, and use that to pivot to broader victories for men.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:57 PM
1

It is fundamentally anti-semitic to deny the children of Jewish and Muslim couples the human rights that all other children are afforded.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 08:54 PM
1

Yup. Good luck with your circumcision awakening. I recommend CIRP and the r/intactivists wiki.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 08:04 PM
3

Just because it was common doesn't mean it was religious. Is this babby's first experience of thinking for himself? Do you need to sit down? Have you read my post below FROM A CHRISTIAN WEBSITE, STATING EXPLICITLY THAT THE COMING OF CHRIST NEGATES THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT? Have you read the Bible? Do you know the main story? I'm not Christian, but if the all-caps is new to you, you should go back to Church for a good "come to Jesus" discussion with somebody. edit: sorry for coming o…
/r/MensRights17/03/18 07:59 PM
7

https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/14950/what-is-the-biblical-basis-for-not-making-circumcision-a-requirement-for-christi Short version: Circumcision is no longer required because Christ has already fulfilled the requirement. Longer version: To be sure, the entirety of the law no longer applies to the Christian, on account of the fact that every requirement of the law has already been met within Christ. That means that the penalty that a Christian might owe for failing to be circum…
/r/MensRights17/03/18 07:52 PM
6

there are several passages in the bible that rule out circumcision, and the Catholic Church has 3 separate statements against circumcising boys, one of which says that circumcising a boy will prevent his eternal salvation. Are you perhaps talking about a different religion?
/r/MensRights17/03/18 07:50 PM
3

Good for you, I wish you the best of luck. I'm more focused on function, and since I can't get the fine touch nerve bundles back, my restoration has slowed quite a bit as I reach my 4th year. So I simplified. It sure does look better even partially restored tho, I must say. Don't forget to moisturize with coconut oil for inner mucosal health.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 02:06 AM
5

Yes, but what did you think of the explanation? I wasn't sure whether or not to throw in the part about penile sensitivity, but the data is so conclusive...
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:16 PM
10

studies have shown that it can often reduce sensitivity in the frenulum, Routine infant circumcision REMOVES the frenulum quite often.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 07:23 PM
10

Let me start by saying I'm glad you're happy with your body. Enjoy it. You only have the one body, and I hope you stay healthy as long as possible so that you can maximize your enjoyment of the body you have. PLEASE UPVOTE SO HE CAN ENGAGE IN PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATION Now, having said that, I also have a body that I mostly enjoy, but I would prefer not to have been circumcised. Here, we can compare our options. I, after having been circumcised, cannot undo the procedure. There are parts of my peni…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 07:22 PM
6

Let me start by saying I'm glad you're happy with your body. Enjoy it. You only have the one body, and I hope you stay healthy as long as possible so that you can maximize your enjoyment of the body you have. PLEASE UPVOTE GONRA SO HE CAN ENGAGE IN PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATION Now, having said that, I also have a body that I mostly enjoy, but I would prefer not to have been circumcised. Here, we can compare our options. I, after having been circumcised, cannot undo the procedure. There are parts of m…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 07:19 PM
4

It's normal to go through an obsessive reading period, in bouts of bibliotherapy, on this topic, as there's so much information that is not often discussed in this area. for me it was in a situation that was pure shit that I learned about this and it led to a series of pretty bad realizations coupled with getting mocked by people I tried to get help from and the fact I'm not a model of emotional stability. I've begun referring to this as the double-whammy of abuse. I'm sure there's a better term…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 04:52 PM
7

Because I wonder what it feels like for him. It feels more exciting and gives him more sensory feedback. Sorry, friend. I've been angry for years about this. You can get angry with anyone you feel like, including your parents, because the default for every other part of the body is to not amputate, but a man's penis gets an exception from medical ethics, for some reason. The medical community started this, remember, because they wanted to reduce sexual pleasure. Look up Dr. Kellogg, or I can pos…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 04:46 PM
1

not even to have a functional civilization? w/e, man. I think we should bring it back
/r/MensRights10/12/17 12:55 AM
1

This is why we need to have a campaign that really makes people listen and question their beliefs, instead of get mad and write us off as douchebags who loudly interrupted their festive and/or spiritual gatherings. Are you new here? Men's Rights has grown exponentially since AVFM started doing in-your-face, anti-feminist activism. Intactivists have been ignored for 40 years now. We need to use our momentum to push the issue to the fore. I don't see a lot of these so-called "regret parents" who w…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 09:28 PM
2

Bullhorns may not be allowed, depending on where you are, but I think shock is quite useful. If enough people were vocal about this, it would send a clear message to parents that they WILL have to talk to their children about this. How is that conversation going to go? "We cut off part of your penis" or "We kept you whole?" If parents learn that their children will find out, it may convince more of them to leave their children intact. As for upsetting the children, I completely disagree with you…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:08 PM
3

O.o
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:38 PM
11

In the US there are people who aren't doctors who are allowed to practice this "surgery" on children Literally anyone in the US may perform this surgery on children. There is no limit at all. It isn't limited to doctors, mohels, and midwives. It's EVERYONE. Right on for pointing this out, friend.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:24 PM
6

The apple is turning regarding male issues. 2 years ago, this same issue was being framed in a way to shame men. I'm sure it still will be, but this is a newspaper testing the waters on showing sympathy to men. Congratulations to anyone who has participated in or funded advocacy for men.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 07:59 PM
2

Good find, John. You're the man!
/r/MensRights18/04/17 05:37 PM
15

How much money would /MR have to put up for this to come to the US? Any ideas?
/r/MensRights02/04/17 12:04 AM
1

I once felt like you. You have lived your entire life missing 75% of the erogenous nerve endings in your penis. Of course you see nothing wrong with this; you've never experienced anything different. We're all glad you enjoy your penis, and you don't think it was terrible to happen to you. However, many men who do more reading on this eventually conclude that they'd rather have had the choice. By cutting children at birth, our societies and parents deny men that choice, and the fact that you got…
/r/MensRights01/04/17 04:27 PM
8

I see the logic of your claim, but I think protecting her life is, first and foremost, her responsibility. Ethics in the post-modern west are inherently personal. Anyway, poor guy. She seems unpleasant
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:26 PM
-43

Or kill her. Self defense is a human right.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:16 PM
1

saying you suffered from genital mutilation (Which I don't deny you did), and saying it affects your everyday life and relationships is probably not true. You're deciding for OP what the extent of damage was from his genital mutilation. Have you seen or interacted with OP's genitals?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 06:54 PM
1

Start with facts, not explanations--trivium method. She did the interview, and stated that the CIA was a source of funding for her work. I have hypotheses on why they would do this, but first you should go look for the interview, and confirm that she said this. You'll find it easily enough.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 01:52 PM
5

To all the men saying "My penis is fine, I'm glad I'm circumcised, why is this an issue?" consider the following. I can tell you're new here, which is excellent. It shows that Men's Rights is growing. I had a feeling we'd see more traffic after the Red Pill documentary was released. Welcome, newfriends. As is the case in many other forums, you need to "lurk moar" to get a feel for a place if you can't take honest discussion. After you answer This_is_my_phone_tho and get your ass handed to you, s…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:11 PM
1

Universities and schools are the centers for indoctrination; nonprofits (paid for by shadowy people and further layers of nonprofits like George Soros's foundations) such as the Feminist Majority, NOW, and Take Back the Night are the centers for the decision-making that leads to much of the anti-male legislation. The Deep State is mixed up in the decision making as well, probably via proxies, but sometimes they're more direct. If you want to see a fun interview, look up on youtube "Gloria Steine…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 06:00 PM
1

Yeah, she did a great job with what she had time to cover a lot of topics.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:56 PM
1

The film focused on father's rights and domestic violence, which seemed appropriate, as these issues are central to men's rights. There wasn't quite enough time spent on circumcision for my taste, but what was included was visceral enough to reach many who could not be reached with words. Warren Farrell and Paul Elam came across as level-headed and ultimately compassionate, whereas the feminist talking heads followed a standard playbook--blame men for their problems, then derail by talking about…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:44 PM
1

Fluoride and estrogen in the water. ITS MAKING THE FROGS GAY
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:52 PM
1

YOU'RE JUST AS BAD AS FEMINISTS WHEN YOU DO THIS YOU REALIZE. Shaming people is not the worst thing feminists ever did. Is pro-intact discussion causing women or men to lose their homes? Is it pushing people literally onto the streets? Is it taking children away from their parents? Is it demanding that men go to war for their right to vote, so that women can advocate for free rights for themselves while the men are away? Is it shutting down free speech, pulling fire alarms, and blocking entrance…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:45 PM
11

It doesn't matter. It's good footage of women expressing how they feel about genital cutting.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 10:09 PM
11

Disrespecting a child's right to genital integrity Calling out the person about to disrespect his/her child's genital integrity Which one is worse?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 10:22 PM
5

http://www.nocirc.org/publish/3pam.pdf
/r/MensRights21/02/17 10:21 PM
1

2019 human trials, 2021 public programs
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:38 PM
2

I've worn it. It's quite comfy, but they need to be washed daily, so if you try it, get at least 3, maybe more like 4 or 5. It was a good transition into restoration for me. It helped the circulation and sensitivity increase a bit, and showed what could be gained if I went all the way to foreskin restoration. But don't try it if you don't want to. I find the Manhood site to be a very useful tool to convince others that circumcision harms the penis.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:31 PM
5

I could if I wanted to. I'm saying this. I think a small percentage of women hold misandrists views and right now they're getting a lot of attention. You're new here, I take it. Welcome. Keep reading, and check out Karen Straughan, who said that women view Feminism like the looters viewed Hurricane Katrina: they don't actively support or distance themselves from it, but they're happy to scoop up the loot afterwards, including worker-provider men with degraded self-esteem who seek identity in the…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:31 PM
4

Learn to love and support yourself. You CAN do this, if you want to.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:38 PM
4

There is overlap, in that MRA's and MGTOW oppose gynocentrism, but the methods are different. MGTOW talk and eventually find other things to do, with a long-term goal of non-participation throwing a wrench into the system; MRA's participate in activism and advocacy to beg for rights for men and boys.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:35 PM
8

Intact is not an agenda, it's a set of rights that we have given to women, but not to men.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:33 PM
0

The comment I originally replied to claimed that Americans get a free pass into heaven on account of our wieners. If you don't like that claim, call him a nitwit and argue with u/JP_Gringo. l2read, faget
/r/MensRights15/02/17 12:25 AM
3

this world is a test Americans get a free pass into heaven on account of our wieners Americans get a free pass into heaven because of a decision they didn't make for themselves Americans pass the test without choosing to do so for themselves whutisthistest.jpg allofmywhut.jpg
/r/MensRights14/02/17 11:57 PM
4

You think God will let you hang out in heaven because your parents elected to remove the most sensitive parts of your penis? Your god is strange. Is this the same guy who drowned millions in a flood? Satan never killed a soul, in the whole Bible. You're worshipping a genocidal figure.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 10:57 PM
1

Just because it's preverbal and therefore difficult to access doesn't mean the pain and experience isn't remembered. Consider this story.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 10:30 PM
-1

Some men are able to access their circumcision trauma given the right setting and/or hypnosis. Others, such as Tom Golden discover through regression therapy that they experienced great trauma at birth that has affected them since. Read that story, and you'll find an answer to your question. edit: woops, it wasn't Golden, but a patient that regressed. Still interesting. Enjoy!
/r/MensRights14/02/17 10:29 PM
-3

Meta-trash comment.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 07:25 PM
2

Go outside and stop spending so much time on the Internet You're wrong, and I don't want you to debate my claims anymore! k
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:02 PM
2

Here's one. edit: any more questions? I've given this a lot of thought and time, so I'd be happy to help if you're wondering anything.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 06:49 PM
3

ITT dudes who aren't circumcised Not exclusively. This thread also contains men harmed by their circumcisions, who are aware of the damage.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 06:26 PM
4

If you think it's stupidity (alone), you don't understand it well enough to influence the problem. There's a shell game of responsibility at play. Doctors convince parents to cut their children, because it's worth $4 billion per year. Parents agree because they know nothing about the foreskin, and don't explicitly know anyone who has one and talks about it. And the children never get a choice. If you go talk to the doctor who got you cut years later, he or she will say that your parents were giv…
/r/MensRights09/02/17 02:23 PM
2

Since the penis is still developing, the penis also has lots of fibroblasts, which are responsible for the rejuvenating effects of foreskin-face cream. The fibroblasts left behind are used by the penis to bind the remaining skin to the shaft, so that no further damage can be done. This makes the penile skin immobile. This immobility increases the friction on the opening to the vagina, so that men and women need lube, experience more unpleasant friction, and can have sex less often. Further,more,…
/r/MensRights09/02/17 02:00 PM
0

How are you getting a second hand splash if you're "happy as a clam" as an adult? If you're an exception to the rule that circumcision reduces penile sensitivity and sexual pleasure (and I can't imagine how that could be the case, but we'll go with it), what is your problem with people talking about it? How are you getting a "second hand splash back" from discussion of a problem you don't face? O.o
/r/MensRights07/02/17 02:55 AM
3

I got cut as an adult So your penis was allowed to develop inside the cozy, protective layer of skin. For those of us cut as babies, the first step is to rip the foreskin off of the glans, to which it is attached at birth. Then, for the rest of our lives, our penises are exposed to first urine and feces, and then years of cotton abrasion. It's amazing that men cut as children feel anything at all. If you're happy with your penis, that's great, but don't pretend that makes you some authority on t…
/r/MensRights07/02/17 02:51 AM
2

what a good utility you are! you're probably proud that you can do so much for a special lady friend, aren't you?! Who's a good boy!!! Who's a good boy!!! rubs your belly
/r/MensRights07/02/17 02:47 AM
3

I don't hold any particular negativity about it, I honestly get the guys who aren't against it because everything seems fine, I guess I wish it wasn't done to me. The challenge is not in finding agreement with the majority ("circumcision is fine because I'm fine") but in changing their minds about whether they should make such a choice for their children, or leave it up to the children when they're older. I don't know why you would bring up that you understand the majority opinion. Everyone unde…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 07:05 PM
2

Shock and dissociation. Their eyelids droop, they look spaced out, and they stop screaming. I'm sorry you were touched by this too.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 01:46 PM
19

Exactly. I think I'm done talking about "feminism." It's women's preferences, enacted through the political system. Women want to be liberated from responsibilities while keeping their privileges. Without a clear selection principle to distinguish feminism, the word becomes irrelevant. What is relevant is women's preferences.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 07:51 PM
72

Women want to be allowed to act like men while being treated like women.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:30 PM
4

If you feel like that's a substantive difference, then fine, tell it to people in that way. The question is, what happens when the person is told that they have a stolen item? When women are told they're enjoying, for free, a "right" men ARE STILL PAYING FOR, do they keep stealing from men, election after election, year after year? Oh, that's right, you already said it: they deny that their ill-gotten goods are stolen, and keep doing it. No, that looks like looter behavior to me. They're taking …
/r/MensRights22/01/17 10:25 PM
2

So... when confronted with a privilege, they deny their privilege, and continue to enjoy it. When confronted by the police, the man with the stolen television denied his theft, took it home, and watched his Sportsball programming. Do see why I say women act like looters?
/r/MensRights22/01/17 10:14 PM
7

In general (talking about women): when confronted with the injustices of ALL WAVES OF FEMINISM, do they act like good community members and go try to fix the problem, or do they call the speaker a misogynist and carry on with their lives, enjoying their unequal privileges? Consider the vote. Men still have to sign up for the draft. Women vote for free. When you bring this up to women in your life, do they engage in special pleading ("Men are the only ones who could possibly defend this country, …
/r/MensRights22/01/17 10:08 PM
1

men and women are ignorant of feminism I disagree with your first example first example was Warren Farrell What are you disagreeing with, what is it that you think, how does my statement contradict your idea, why are you subdividing feminism into multiple waves... I need a bit more clarity.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 10:01 PM
3

The point of the women's march was to show Donald Trump that he is still responsible for caring for all the women. Furthermore, the Rockefellers and Rothschilds rigged the game so that only they, and those who pay homage to them, will be rich enough to change society with their wealth. The Rothschilds paid for wave after wave of feminism to destroy the family and to make women's work taxable. You can't beat the super-rich at their own game. Grassroots efforts and memetic warfare may be the answe…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:37 PM
11

Women, as a group, view Feminism as the looters viewed Hurricane Katrina. They may not support the damage that is done, but rather than undo it, they will take their goodies and remain silent. If you are different from my characterization, I am glad to hear it. You may try to convince other women to support you, but you will find that most will refuse to help. There are no Feminists who supported Men's Rights and remained influential. Example: Warren Farrell served on the board of NOW. MRA's are…
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:33 PM
9

She's a good writer. She had a piece a few months back about MGM; I kept waiting for her to reference how IT'S FUCKING RETARDED TO CUT YOUR CHILDREN'S GENITALS IMMEDIATELY AFTER BIRTH, but perhaps she didn't feel it was relevant? lmao, drinking bleach
/r/MensRights09/01/17 09:35 PM
1

I still have the glans, but my frenulum and frenular delta were severely damaged/amputated. I've had trouble orgasming since I started jerking it, and I often can't orgasm without employing the death grip.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 03:09 AM
2

Same
/r/MensRights07/01/17 02:57 AM
4

*and nerves fuck
/r/MensRights07/01/17 01:48 AM
1

why you wouldn't like to hear evidence I stopped reading there. adonis8 provided no evidence. Oops.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 04:47 PM
6

Now, I must say that the glans has become quite insensitive and its good to not have that hyper sensitive feeling anymore but i also realise that it has reduced the sexual feeling as well. But honestly its not like how some sites report that .. its not like the penis is dead or anything .. it just maybe a little less sensitive. But i dont care about that.. cause my medical issue anyway prevented a normal sex life and now i can do whatever i want ..so what if i have lost some sensitivity .. its n…
/r/MensRights30/12/16 05:54 PM
17

trolling intact men on /MR Stay classy /s
/r/MensRights30/12/16 04:29 PM
1

proof that she's a feminist? not disagreeing with you, but I wasn't at that protest. The signs around her do not necessarily indicate feminism.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 12:53 AM
2

Don't forget the Tavistock institute-affiliated marketing specialist (((Edward Bernays))) who started the Freedom Torches smoking campaign of the early 20th century. The apple is rotten to the core. Considering this isn't r/conspiracy though, you're doing great and connecting a ton of dots. Good work, fellow free-thinker!
/r/MensRights14/11/16 12:50 AM
3

I hope she shares her money with the accused.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 07:39 PM
5

sex sells better than eczema, that's for sure
/r/MGTOW25/09/16 03:18 PM
10

"Alpha" It's r/MGTOW, call it what it is: a man not standing up to a woman's unreasonable standards. "Alpha" is just a label used to divide men who think that they've found the correct mating strategy. Other than that, good post. I'd just add that once again, we have a woman who was famous for her looks and decides to sell her soul to hollywood rather than face the fact that her glory days are behind her. She should build her dynasty by raising those children she's adopted, not by attempting to …
/r/MGTOW25/09/16 03:17 PM
1

I tried to express these ideas, but you've put it better. Thanks.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 08:55 PM
1

you can't blame your parents for following normal procedure in this society Of course you can. Some people judge others based on their intentions, and others judge others on the results of their actions. Circumcision has negatively impacted his life, and OP, NOT his parents, has to suffer the lifelong consequences of this. Who made the decision? Who should bear the responsibility for all consequences, intended and unintended? The doctor didn't consent. The patient didn't consent. The parents dec…
/r/MensRights24/09/16 08:53 PM
0

I haven't forgiven my parents, and you don't have to if you don't want to. Eventually, you might choose to, as forgiveness allows you to move on, but I certainly have not made this choice yet. After I move out of their house, I don't think I'll ever talk to them again. Circumcision is a violation, and it was their responsibility to protect you. They chose a surgery for you, and it hurt you. You're going to live with this for the rest of your life. I'm sorry for you loss. If you ever want to thin…
/r/MensRights24/09/16 08:49 PM
1

Good teaser. I hope it makes it to broad circulation. I'll watch it.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 08:42 PM
3

I think there should be a double standard, where the age of consent is higher for boys than for girls. Girls hit puberty (much, MUCH) earlier than boys, and thus have more experience with controlling their feelings at an earlier age. In contrast, boys can hit 17 and suddenly be awash in hormones and previously-unknown feelings. We should protect the emotionally-inexperienced boys with an age of consent law that would allow them to press charges against their peers if they felt they had been take…
/r/MensRights22/09/16 02:08 AM
1

I'm working on endurance and just over all strength of my body. But more in a Bruce Lee kind of way since I'm very skinny and can't gain weight easily Get your testosterone checked, you might want to look into an anti-aging clinic in your area; fingers-crossed you'll get Clomid and Anastrozole (arimedex). I was in the same boat, found out I had low T, started Clomid, gained 10 pounds in lean muscle, and plateaued. Not perfect, but it's better than where I was. Or not. Either way, jump rope is gr…
/r/MGTOW04/09/16 08:42 PM
2

Thanks, I'm sorry for your loss as well, friend. I hope that the internet communities begin to expand into real life more soon, so that grown-up playdates of various forms become more of a norm; "Beer, bros, and Xbox" being the current most popular among Millennials. I don't care if my brothers call themselves MGTOW, but I want to see more men doing exciting and personally fulfilling things, beyond just chasing women. ZedRedPeony, may I ask what your hobbies are? Don't dox yourself or anything, …
/r/MGTOW04/09/16 04:15 PM
2

WWIII is coming, and I am horrified too, OP. My plan is to enjoy my life. They already took my foreskin; fuck society, I'm living my life for me. Good luck, friend.
/r/MGTOW03/09/16 08:32 PM
1

Sometimes he's right, sometimes he isn't. The idea that there are intelligence agents on the internet is well-recognized in some circles. The Pantsload blog doesn't look like just a personal interest project to me. But feel free to write off any ideas you don't like, disagree with, or would rather not consider with whatever reasoning you like, including labels like "crackpot." I think his hypotheses are fascinating, and I appreciate that Mathis frequently invites his readers to disagree and disr…
/r/MensRights01/09/16 05:00 PM
0

Feminism can't, by itself, melt steel beams. Good joke, it looks like it was low effort
/r/MensRights01/09/16 02:52 AM
0

take the good, ignore the things that don't make sense to you. he makes this suggestion repeatedly in his writings, from what i've seen so far. the Pantsload website has the appearance of a targeted harassment/intel operation of the sort that Mathis writes about, lol. Note that the author has nothing to comment on after a few months attacking one person, and stopped updating before even a year had passed.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 02:31 AM
1

It's only 14 pages, but... CHS misuses statistics when discussing male vs female skills. She is supported and signal-boosted by mainstream media and bankster think tanks. Her arguments suggest policies that look good but would only lead to military style indoctrination of boys and further division of the sexes, rather than emancipation from indoctrination for boys and girls (a preferable outcome). That's much of it, but there's more. If this is interesting enough that you want to comment on it, …
/r/MensRights01/09/16 01:59 AM
0

do you have an argument, source, or explanation? His criticisms of Sommers's research citations made sense to me, although I'm only halfway through.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 12:43 AM
8

completely ignores any pros or benefits of circumcision. ...such as?
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:50 PM
2

Can you define mutilation, please? take an upboat, so more people see your idea.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:13 PM
4

There's a long history of tone policing, and I'm glad to hear you've found your side of the argument. The MRM has won attention in recent years by being provocative, not by being gentle. Have an upboat; I'd like people to see your argument and its rebuttals.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:12 PM
3

the earlier he starts restoring, the sooner he'll have (much of) an entire penis. Carefully consider how you'll talk to your son about this. I wish my parents had told me about restoration, or at least hadn't discouraged me from doing it.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 05:52 PM
9

It was popularized to damage the male sex organ by JH Kellogg in the name of health, b/c masturbation and sex were viewed as dirty (and causative of disease). JHK didn't have sex with even his wife, because he viewed that as dirty (sinful). It continued because our definition of "cleanliness" changed but the word stayed the same, and no one wanted to recognize that they had been damaged without cause. So the point for men is avoiding discomfortable realizations, the point for women is cosmetic p…
/r/MensRights28/08/16 05:21 PM
1

It's also possible they think it'll reduce HIV, I suppose
/r/MensRights26/08/16 11:45 PM
1

I suspect it's related to the constant conflicts in the countries that continue to circumcise (muslim countries, israel, and the us). Perhaps they believe that circumcision pushes more men in a population to be willing to behave violently. If the elites sow disorder in Africa, they can more easily take the resources. Do you have an alternate hypothesis?
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:27 PM
4

It's promoted by Western elites, such as the Clinton and Gates foundations. They lie about it to promote it. The next step will be to encourage MGM at birth, so that it becomes an entrenched practice from which Africa cannot escape for many generations.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 02:54 PM
1

AVFM had a website, but they took it down. it got them some attention, but it wasn't perfectly vetted.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 08:25 PM
2

I've been trying to make it work in a twin bed since I was a teenager. Shared sleeping is tough. Morning sex is only occasionally worth it.
/r/MGTOW09/08/16 08:37 PM
12

I'm happy for you. I'm almost there, thinking long and hard about giving up weed to focus more on my exercise, diet, and reading. Enjoy the hell out of the rest of your life, friend. It's good to hear (even digitally) from another man who will never go back to the plantation.
/r/MGTOW09/08/16 08:35 PM
1

Can you give any examples of such states, or places where we can learn more about the states that offer legal paternal surrender?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/16 11:17 PM
4

That's more disturbing than I expected. fuck.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 12:43 AM
1

Sorrells 2007 in BJU
/r/MensRights29/07/16 10:30 PM
1

where do you meet people?
/r/MGTOW03/07/16 06:05 PM
22

real men We're all real men. take your red pills. the "real man" description is just more shaming language that you seem to have internalized.
/r/MGTOW02/07/16 10:28 PM
1

It just seems to be a silly and weak comparison that he tries to use to start his whole article, which is entirely anecdotal. He acknowledges the potential weakness of his argument when he talks about his potential "confirmation bias." He knows that his evidence is anecdotal. So both you and Adams agree that this doesn't prove his analysis (that men are humiliated in America). Do you disagree that men are humiliated in America, or are you just reiterating that he doesn't prove his premise?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 09:24 PM
2

V-neck t-shirts are different from V-neck sweaters. Also, you're personalizing this. I'm straight, and I also wear V-neck t-shirts. They're nice. Relax, friend.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 08:26 PM
10

Excellent, he is growing
/r/MensRights23/06/16 08:22 PM
2

If Warren Farrell gets his way, there will be more MRA's than there have ever been before. I hope it doesn't come to that, but that's how backlashes work.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:32 PM
6

keep it, sauce is good (sources)
/r/MensRights01/06/16 10:56 PM
4

It's upsetting to me, as a mutilated male, when you describe this medical procedure as "chopping babies genitals up." It's very descriptive, much more so than "circumcision." Keep it up, fam.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 07:36 PM
1

Ive been looking for the number of draftees that died in Vietnam for a few years, and I still can't find it. Have you ever seen this number anywhere?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:12 PM
3

Me too, friend, me too. I'm near DC though, so it still isn't safe today for males to be born in my neck of the woods.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 05:59 PM
4

It may be under 50% of current births in the US; statistics can be hard to come by, and the media wants to preserve the status quo. It's certainly a minority of parents on the West Coast who still mutilate their boys. The East Coast will catch up in 20 years, if not sooner.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 09:24 AM
4

Humans can work themselves up over anything. Women are humans. HotDealsInTexas was making the point that although women may be able to convince themselves that they're the "real" victims in all of this, the most direct victim of sexuality-shaming is men, not women, no matter how "royally pissed off" some women become.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 01:18 PM
1

Hey man, it's a cool idea, but Sorrells already did the test back in 2007. He found that the inner foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis, and that this is true even in circumcised men (who usually still have a bit of inner foreskin just under the glans). Thus, the removed tissue is the most sensitive tissue, and circumcised men are limited to a fraction of that tissue. Thus, circumcision necessarily reduces sexual pleasure. Or, to put it more succinctly: 1) Circumcision is the removal…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 11:54 PM
4

I liked the pro-intact message
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:28 PM
2

FGM includes ritual nicks or pinpricks of the female genitals. With FGM, they usually aren't lopping off the entire clitoris, just making a very small incision into the hood of the clitoris. The hood of the clitoris is analogous to the "foreskin." I've considered your statements that you don't feel like you've been sexually abused. However, cutting tissue off of someone else's genitals is abuse of a sexual nature. Your parents intentions don't change the reality of their actions. You received PE…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 02:52 PM
1

So you have never seen a circumcision performed? The pro-intact crowd has dozens of videos demonstrating that the child suffers considerably. Did the doctor you spoke with have any evidence to support her statement that babies sleep through circumcision? Pro-intact doctors assert that the procedure requires a high amount of concentration, given that the tissue and patient is so small and minor mis-cuts can lead to drastic problems, so that doctors who are performing circumcisions cannot monitor …
/r/MensRights11/03/16 08:15 PM
1

Your objection (all babies feel some pain) is controlled for by using a control group that wasn't circumcised. Furthermore, let's pause on the idea that the trauma "may" be significant. Have you watched any of the videos others have posted? Do the babies look like they're in a pain that you would have any interest in sharing (no matter what your age)?
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:16 PM
1

Yeah, I guess you're right, we can't conclusively say that circumcision causes psychological trauma over the course of a man's life. However, this doesn't mean that the trauma at the time of incident is insignificant, or that the lack of lifelong trauma somehow makes it permissible. The study shows at least 6 months trauma, which, to my mind, sounds like too much for someone who isn't consenting and who will receive no certain/demonstrable benefit.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 04:46 PM
1

The target is 10%. For any given idea, if 10% of the population believes/understands it, the idea will spread, as 10% is the tipping point. In order for us to get legislation passed or other changes, the populace must first understand why change is needed. Education is a very important step, and I know it's frustrating as someone who already understands these issues, but we shouldn't get too far ahead of ourselves. Our ideas must spread. There are of course more ways to spread the message than j…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 11:41 PM
5

I've tried to build a friend circle out of people who listen and talk to me when I reach out... so I'm down 1 friend, 1 gf, and shakier familial relations. There is no widespread sympathy for men who are struggling, and there likely never will be, as men who have problems are perceived by others as being the source of their own problems, and thus undeserving of help. Perceived male hyperagency is a powerful force in our society.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 11:33 PM
28

i like how you've redirected your irritation at the injustice so that instead your communication clearly shows the principles you stand for. You're not whining; you're leading. This is the kind of thing MR needs.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 04:35 PM
1

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9057731 This study shows neurological damage (increased pain sensitivity over the whole body, not just isolated to the damaged sex organ) in infants 6 months after circumcision. From this, one can deduce that circumcision alters the brain and causes pain after circumcision to be more traumatic than it otherwise would be. I would elaborate from this that more pain --> more psychological trauma over the course of the man's life. What do you think of this informat…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 05:45 PM
0

If I could show you evidence of psychological trauma, would that change your mind?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 04:33 PM
5

...opposition to genital mutilation? MR and Intactivists oppose circumcision. Thus, they share a position regarding the nonconsensual cutting of infant genitals.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 04:53 PM
10

We're "conditioned" by watching women, talking to women, and interacting with women. NAWALT is true, but most women are not at all similar to CaptainNeeMoNoy's wife, and if your plan is to wait until you find one like her, you may be waiting for a long, long time. Good for you, oshout. Let women pay for their own things.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 05:15 PM
0

the comments are great
/r/MensRights28/02/16 05:11 PM
1

To quote another commenter (Samantha_Cruz) The first question that came to mind when reading this was "what is the source of these quotes" - I thought it might be some femdom fetish site or such but it appears that most of them came from a "human sexuality" forum post specifically asking women if they would "castrate a guy and why" - http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/T256ICGC1D7DJGSPQ/p2 Nothing in the question seems to suggest that it's "merely a fantasy"; it seems posed as "would you really …
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:33 PM
2

There is information about the foreskin that boys should know. Leave out all mention of circumcision unless otherwise asked, but boys should know of all functions of the foreskin, how to clean it (light rinse with water), and how it develops (i.e. that it may not separate fully until later in life, but that issues can usually be fixed with a cream and stretching exercises). The kids who have foreskins should know of their benefits.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:49 PM
4

Yes, this is sexist because it precludes the possibility that gender violence is a men's issue because MEN ARE VICTIMS OF IT.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 01:04 AM
7

He makes a new video on his views of manosphere topics every day. Literally, one per day for over a year now. His videos are short and generally incorporate interesting anecdotes and his opinions. It's lightweight stuff, and there's definitely some pseudoscience in it, but he has a good following of people who generally want to hear someone bs'ing about his experiences. Commenters on his videos discuss their own experiences with the topic, and things roll from there. Sandman's youtube channel ca…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:41 PM
6

i'm a transracial black lesbian trapped in a shitlord's body, and I know I'm not the only one. Maybe we're already there, we just need some of the top brass to come out of the closet? In all seriousness though, that's a retarded comment left by Warrior4SocialJustice. Generals are professionals, and the taxpayers are employing them to perform their duties and keep everything else away from the public view. There are likely high-ranking gay officers (if not trans officers) in the military already,…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:36 PM
2

No, it doesnt exist at that age. Different.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 05:51 PM
6

Non-linear relation. Since circumcised men receive less (or no) feedback during sex, they rush to feel pleasure, so some finish more quickly (since the orgasm is the only reliably pleasurable bit for some of us) while others just wait it out and come later due to less sensation. Sex becomes less pleasurable if you're circumcised, but the amount of time to ejaculate varies from man to man. Some studies show increased latency, others no difference, although premature ejaculation and delayed are bo…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 03:29 PM
6

Your reaction is the author's goal in using the word "mauled". You're bragging about being manipulated by the author's word choice. Lurk moar.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 03:25 PM
22

Pls keep talking about this, there are still people who think MGM is safe.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:31 PM
1

I know a female in her early 20s who has only slept with her current bf who turned me on to CF. The population you're describing May be there, but the only person I know who goes to that sub does not fit your description.
/r/MGTOW22/01/16 03:48 PM
2

Shoe0nHead just said some silly things, I don't think she's an MRA, as she seems to think MRA's are dunderheads, or something. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j1AVf1j2aA
/r/MensRights19/01/16 09:17 PM
7

I love NCFM, I just wish they got more coverage. Great work, bros!
/r/MensRights19/01/16 08:47 PM
1

O.o c'mere, cuz
/r/MensRights19/01/16 07:52 PM
2

I'll bet your children are having a hard time. Get help, please.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 04:26 PM
2

Go see a psychologist. You're paranoid (posting on Gang Stalking) and ill-informed. Jackson Katz sells misandry, he will not help boys. If you implement his advice in raising your children, it will mess up your children.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 03:51 PM
5

Jackson Katz You mean the guy reinforcing the idea that IPV is a problem men should fix for women? https://www.ted.com/talks/jackson_katz_violence_against_women_it_s_a_men_s_issue?language=en
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:29 PM
2

I want to see comparative stats for younger women. This is interesting, but could be more interesting.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 01:01 AM
1

Citation needed for all claims regarding women being questioned about being raped. Analogous citations, please.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:57 AM
1

It seems reasonable because she hasn't said what is and isn't rape. Is drunken sex rape? If she thinks 2 drunk people having sex is a man raping a woman, then it isn't a reasonable position. I'd she thinks the situation in the poster below with Jake and Josie isn't rape, then she's posting in the wrong place and should instead go talk to the thousands of feminists who think it IS rape. I'll keep reading and apologize again, but I'm pretty sure you've been trolled again, /MR/, by another feminist…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:56 AM
3

If Barney the Dinosaur invited me over and offered me some pills because I was "stressed" my first thought would be along the lines of, "I'd better leave. He's trying to fuck me." ResponsibleDrugUse
/r/MensRights04/01/16 05:58 PM
1

my solution is that someone posts ideas answering the guy's question: are there any support networks/groups for men who suffer anxiety, depression, etc. because of their circumcision? I think anyone who knows of some help should post, and people telling him to do what he wanted to do (get help) should shut the fuck up. lol.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 05:06 PM
1

But they are mostly bad in this occupation on this issue, and there is little to no information on how therapists could improve. The closest I've seen is a list of recommendations compiled by Lindsay Watson a few months ago submitted by men who tried going to therapy for this issue and found it fruitless. I can direct you to the article if you'd like. Therapists don't have methods of helping men with this issue, and they have no interest in working on methods for this issue. Therefore, therapy i…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:15 PM
2

The guy literally posted to ask if anyone knew where he could find help. Your advice (charitably)? "Get help." You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:11 PM
2

DO NOT CUT MORE TISSUE OFF OF YOUR PENIS I doubt there is a surgical option that leaves you with the same amount of tissue that you started with. Since it is likely that some of the tissue that is removed will be erogenous, I would strongly urge you to wait on any surgery until you're a few years into restoration. Surgery will only slow down your stretching.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:26 AM
2

i'm a year and a half into it. it may take decades, and few people hit a point where they're willing to stop stretching. the amount of time you spend on it will depend on how much was amputated at birth. if it hurts, lower the tension. if you buy a device, the goal is to be able to wear it comfortably for most of an hour, take it off for a minute or two, do another hour, rinse and repeat until you're at 4-8 hours per day. the first month is mostly your skin increasing its mobility and recognizin…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:24 AM
–

"Livid" reporting in. Fuck genital cutting. I've been suicidal over this for over a year now. We wouldn't allow this shit to happen to girls at birth. I was cut extremely tight. 1.5 years of restoration has done very little to increase sensitivity. Know that suicide is the only answer for those cut too tight for sensations from the foreskin. edit: actually, some circumcised men just abstain from sex. I doubt my gf would appreciate this, but I think she'd understand.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 01:08 PM
4

same, bro :/
/r/MensRights07/12/15 06:17 PM
2

Yeah, the conversation always goes this way. "They're different, and you're drawing attention away from FGM by comparing it to circumcision, which isn't that big a deal" is the standard feminist answer.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 06:15 PM
2

I think loneliness inside a relationship is far worse than loneliness while single. To be lonely and single is to be in need of a friend. Lonely and married means you are not being helped by your best friend. ...and yeah, I know almost all women can't actually be that best friend for men. Hence, MGTOW and the fall of marriage.
/r/MGTOW24/11/15 12:14 AM
4

What is "IMD"? I don't know this acronym. I agree with everything you've said though. Take some time away from MR, friend. I've taken a few months away from the subreddit, and it's helped me a lot. edit: Oh, today, the holiday. Sorry for your exhaustion, friend.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 08:47 PM
2

My pleasure. I think our ideas are spreading. I look forward to the coming decade.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 08:28 PM
2

Donated. Your turn, boys.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 06:49 PM
1

Dude, hush, it's supposed to be a secret; you'll let the newfags know that lifting and game don't change hypergamy. Most people don't sleep with people they meet for the first time at bars, so these men who go to bars to meet strangers are competing for a minority of women (those who will sleep with strangers they meet in bars/clubs) who are swimming in dick. Add to this the fact that women mostly go to bars/clubs for entertainment, not sex per se, and the fact that the women who are actually lo…
/r/askTRP01/11/15 10:05 PM
4

It's actually mostly muslims cut, for a grand total of 1.2 billion men worldwide
/r/MensRights06/10/15 12:35 AM
2

There's so much drivel in this, it's hard to put together a rebuttal. The author seems to think false rape accusations are somehow related to rape. You should see the lightbulb go off when people around you realize these are different things. It's amazing. Furthermore, the number of false rape accusations that turn into false-filing charges is different from the total number of false accusations, so the metric used by the author before the first break is a stupid metric to use. After that, I sto…
/r/MensRights28/09/15 05:56 PM
1

You're a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 10:50 PM
1

Look up Sorrells 2007. The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis (in terms of fine touch receptors and sensitivity). It absolutely diminishes pleasure.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 10:35 PM
2

This article is fucking genius. I hope that this helps us so that the next generation can have their whole penises. This actually makes me hopeful for the future. The opening is so well done.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 11:07 PM
0

Would a guy with an abundance mentality seriously be worried about fucking proposing just because he had a few too many beers? Many men have difficulty getting laid consistently, and this is true with or without one's abundance mentality. In fact, if your abundance mentality doesn't reflect your position in the sexual marketplace, I think you should toss out your abundance mentality, as it could easily lead you to throw aside women who may be as attractive as you. Abundance mentality appears to …
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 09:23 AM
10

If you want kids, get a lawyer to draft a surrogacy contract and start looking for a woman you can pay to not drink for 9 months. Game plays directly into the hands of any woman who wants to make you a wage-slave. Welcome to reality.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 09:17 AM
12

I'm just gonna drop this here. Men, you need to understand that women view you as utilities if you're trying to use "status" to get laid. The fact is that the male caller doesn't have much in the way of bargaining power, since she can leave with the kids and house in modern family courts. Men should avoid marriage so that they can at least leave a shit-tier woman like this. https://i1.wp.com/www.pressandjournal.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2014/09/backup_infographic_F.jpg
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 09:15 AM
9

Yep. I hope to someday be recognized as a legitimate victim of a sexual assault, because my genitals were nonconsensually mutilated the day after I was born. I doubt it will ever happen.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 11:04 PM
6

1) that's a 1.2% decline since the 80's 2) no measures of statistical significance or standard deviation given, but all averages were well within the healthy bounds 3) sleep also causes testosterone levels to increase. Get more sleep, brothers! edit: 1.3% per year. My mistake. Guess T levels really are decreasing. I wish the press release would include more numbers and at least a mention of statistical significance.
/r/MGTOW21/09/15 10:51 PM
1

i prefer whole, but our aesthetic preferences aren't particularly important when it comes to other people's bodies, as you implied. Harm is harm.
/r/MGTOW14/09/15 07:35 PM
1

What Nick is saying is necessarily true, since the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis and circumcision removes the foreskin. The downvote does not meaningfully contribute to the debate, and hiding this from yourselves (addressing my circumcised brothers, here) will not change what has been done to you. If it matters so much that you would try to hide this via downvotes, it's time to think about restoration.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 05:07 PM
2

You're right, they're not all sexual, but the same is true of the nerve ending counts you'll hear regarding the clitoris. What is known is that many of the nerves are sexual. How much more do you need to know? It's a specialized organ that is meant to function as a whole unit, with stimulation of the glans and foreskin working synergistically. If you cut off the foreskin, the synergy is lost and sensitivity necessarily suffers.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 05:04 PM
2

Since you seem curious, here's a video explaining the sensitivity vs. time thing. A major piece of this is that intact penises feel better, so men thrust less hard and last longer while feeling more by going a bit more slowly but being fully satisfied by the sensation that this slower movement provides. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgoTRMKrJo4
/r/MensRights09/09/15 05:01 PM
1

Sorrells 2007: circumcision reduces penile sensitivity. The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis in intact men. In circumcised men, the circumcision scar is the most sensitive part. http://www.circumstitions.com/Sexuality.html#sorrells
/r/MensRights09/09/15 04:51 PM
1

Thanks for sticking up for men on the Men's Rights subreddit, Nick.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 04:48 PM
1

Also: risk of skin bridges, amputation of the entire glans, amputation of the entire penis, death by loss of blood (babies are small, and they don't need to lose much blood to die), infection, certainty of aversion to condom use (which makes it more likely he'll catch a disease, impregnate a woman accidentally, etc.)
/r/MensRights09/09/15 04:45 PM
1

Circumcision isn't a standardized medical practice because it doesn't alleviate any disease. As such, your kids could turn out fine (in the sense of losing only the expected functions and benefits of having a foreskin) or fubar. I have a brother who has no problems with his circumcision, but I lost so much skin that I've had very low sensitivity since I started masturbating. The only way to save your children from such risk is to allow your children to make up their minds for themselves.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 04:42 PM
1

Like this is a remote possibility. How can one change the world when the world itself is immutable? I'll give examples from my life, if you don't mind. Ways I've changed my world over the last year: fewer classes at a time more marijuana more sports, more exercise more foreskin via restoration, such that the previous stimuli now feel much better and more intense better diet better organization of my things by throwing huge shelf-racks wherever I need more storage, until I had more than enough st…
/r/MGTOW08/09/15 05:48 PM
1

much of the Q&A is reported by the live blog from Brown (link in OP)
/r/MensRights07/09/15 08:07 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBsk1WzEdCA
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:38 AM
1

I have a youtube link, but only the opening statements. PM me if you want the link. Was the Q&A even filmed?
/r/MensRights06/09/15 10:01 PM
1

What do you think of "feminist" ? Among the men who have some idea of female nature or at least have caught on to the misandry around us, this is an effective means of pointing out the types of women we would like to shame. It also has the ambiguity of "creep" such that women who don't get it won't notice as you express public shaming of women among the Red-Pilled. edit: "feminist" is on its way towards becoming a LKS. You can tell from HeForShe's speech in front of the UN.
/r/MGTOW06/09/15 08:51 PM
1

Have you read this? http://www.metanoia.org/suicide/index.html If your world isn't positively stimulating enough to engage with it, change your world. I'm slowly recovering from an over-exuberant circumcision by restoring, and I'm biding my time as I stretch by smoking as much weed as I like, playing fuckloads of badminton, and, as you say, "doing this" (as a hobby). I'm sorry you're suffering such anhedonia. Another thing you may want to check out is Scott Adams' moist robot hypothesis, which, …
/r/MGTOW06/09/15 08:45 PM
1

Someone else citing this same survey came up with different numbers for2009. Guess I'm going to dig up a study.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 01:24 PM
5

Sorry if I overdid it :p Here's hoping that 32% figure is accurate
/r/MensRights04/09/15 05:40 PM
6

Agreed, but if it's under 50% we (those of us, cut or whole, who oppose cutting into kids) will almost certainly reach a critical mass that will cause a further decline. Moderate Jews are already backing away from the practice, and in 20 years we'll be able to attack circumcision as an extreme practice of an extreme brand of Judaism. Meanwhile, non-Jews and non-Muslims will abandon it along with moderate Jews. My hope is that this snowballs itself until we can all recognize that religious freedo…
/r/MensRights04/09/15 02:45 PM
8

Maybe mine is worse than yours, I've had trouble climaxing since I started masturbating. Every mutilation is different, as it isn't a standardized medical procedure. If you don't have this problem, I'm happy for you, but it doesn't change the fact that I do, and that this is one of many problems that come with circumcisions.
/r/MGTOW04/09/15 10:46 AM
6

I read recently that the rate was 32% among newborns in 2009. Hugs all around, gentlemen. We did it. We are the last generation of majority circumcised men in the US. It sucks to be the last group to be mutilated, and I'm sorry it worked out this way, but I can die now, knowing that we are facing the end of MGM.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 08:06 AM
-3

I thought the article did pretty well in some ways, such as it's discussion of the history of modern Men's Rights and the big organizations. Most journalists don't know what NCFM is, for example. I stopped reading well before the end though.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 07:57 AM
6

Yeah, doood, why doesn't he just Man Up and accept someone else's decision to surgically alter his penis? /s
/r/MGTOW04/09/15 07:24 AM
9

I care because I've suffered from diminished sensitivity caused by my circumcision. This practice of cutting healthy tissue off of men's penises is barbaric, and it has real costs for the men who suffer it, even if they don't know what they're missing. Hint: your glans ain't supposed to be so dry, bro, and the remnants of the inner foreskin are supposed to be mucous membrane, like your lips and eyelids.
/r/MGTOW04/09/15 07:20 AM
1

I've been seeing the same girl for 5 years, because we don't fuck with each other. I'm here because there is no such thing as a NAWALT, and people can change any day. I center my life on work, vidya, sports, and reading things that interest me, just like you (probably) do, OP. I think it's probably better that men become Awakened While Married, since some percentage of them will be divorced, and post-divorce is one of the most common times for suicide. An early awakening will give more men a cha…
/r/MGTOW04/09/15 02:55 AM
116

I literally tried to point this out to a guy an hour ago, and it looks like he blocked me on FB after I pointed out that supporting discrimination is bigotry.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:23 AM
2

This is potentially true, but given that developmental influence is backloaded (the strongest influence occurs early), and that women dominate contact with children early in development, I'd say it's mostly women making women crazy. Same argument about crazy men. While there are occasionally men causing men to lose their shit, it's mostly mothers who are responsible for the blue-pill men who can't cope with life well enough to recognize the problems with women and society in general.
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 09:13 PM
2

If Teel Deer is anti-mgtow, why does he talk to Stardusk so much, and what the fuck do you think they talk about? Mutual animosity towards Sandman? Teal Deer is anti-stupid, and he's found a couple MGTOW who aren't making their points well. I haven't seen him attack any MGTOW without cause. Feel free to correct me if you've seen something unwarranted.
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 09:11 PM
5

Smoke weed erreday, does that count?
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 09:08 PM
3

i'm 15 months into it, and i can confirm that you can grow tissue back. it's pretty great, although sometimes uncomfortable (that's how you know it's time to give your skin a break of that you need to adjust something). If you have any questions, feel free to get a burner account (or use this one) at the foreskin_restoration subreddit, or pm me.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 09:04 PM
2

How big is your foreskin? It's skin. It's a loose flap of skin that encloses around the glans. Like, what are you getting on? It's 15 square inches, and volumetrically around 1/3 of your penis. You might be longer (as your body would have had more room to grow during puberty), but you would certainly be thicker if you had all the "skin" you were born with. It's a lot of tissue.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 07:01 PM
3

Perhaps I have underestimated how necessary circumcision is to the Jews. Damn it. I have heard of some intactivists spreading the message that non-circumcising Jews have a place in synagogue, but I guess this hasn't spread very far. God fucking damn it. If you're right, that's fucked up.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 06:58 PM
2

I don't see how it garners him any more or less of a pass for mutilating his child.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:15 PM
2

What does his judaism have to do with it?
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:02 PM
1

It looks like Ashley Madison is almost entirely men. http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/08/20/ashley-madison-database-hack-cheating-vatican/32052195/ Elsewhere, I've seen claims (a few years old) that the website runs like candy crush by forcing men to make micropayments to see messages from fake women (potentially created by Ashley Madison itself). Since there are so few women (~13% of the total profiles dumped), I think this corroborates the claim that there are fake profiles created and …
/r/MGTOW20/08/15 09:13 PM
2

Yeah , the sidebar seems to pre-date Bar Bar and others pointing out that libertarianism cannot be the core of mgtow. Thanks for drawing attention to this stuff, OP.
/r/MGTOW18/08/15 04:09 PM
1

The Methods argument is bogus. Men and women use different methods in different cultures, but men always die more. This is because men are more certain that there problems will not be fixed and that they will not be helped.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 03:30 PM
2

There was a thread on r/mgtow about this a while ago. Someone claimed that the foster-child system is heavily anti-male, based on his experience. I don't know how widespread it was. I'll see if I can dig anything up later. edit: https://www.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/2y2645/serious_what_are_the_options_for_a_red_pill_who/cp5qrb7
/r/MensRights24/07/15 09:54 PM
1

Does the smiley mean sarcasm? I found him too annoying to watch more than the first 30 seconds, so I can't comment on how informative Aaron Clarey is. I hold a bit of a grudge since the doxxing though. Aaron Clarey would have to be encyclopaedically informative for me to conclude that he's been a boon to the MGTOW community.
/r/MGTOW16/07/15 05:21 PM
3

Isn't this the guy who doxxed stardusk and bar bar? Why the fuck is Aaron Clarey on r/MGTOW?
/r/MGTOW16/07/15 06:30 AM
7

It's just so insane and so disturbing and so hurtful that it makes me want to blow my brains out. Same. I hope circumcision ends, but I'm cut already, and I have low sensitivity already (and it gets worse with age), so I have to pick whether to live with it (plus whatever restoration I can do) or not. For those of us who are cut and understand what that means, the choices aren't happy ones.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:13 AM
1

I just talked to my sister about this (body image is a men's issue too) today, and she blew me off by challenging the idea that it is as big of a deal for men. Then she pointed to the dad-bod phenomenon and derailed. thanks for the help, /MR. Thanks for the stats to back me up.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 04:01 AM
2

In many ways, this is good news. I would, however, like to point out his recent article arguing that men should be circumcised because it is healthier and more attractive. Perhaps it was satire, but it left me (a cut male with little sensitivity in his penis) with a bitter taste in my mouth. I hope that Oberlin hires other professors who can speak more intelligently on male anatomy. http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/05/28/no-one-wants-to-live-in-a-world-of-uncircumcised-penises/
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:09 AM
1

I wasn't alive then, but did anyone ever listen to Jimmy Carter? Does anyone think people will start listening to him now? Just sayin'. [and yes, I agree that this is another exhibit of gynocentrism in TED, so I'm not saying it doesn't belong here; it's just that no one gives a flying f*ck about Jimmy Carter for any reason]
/r/MensRights01/07/15 12:47 AM
3

As a TA, I tried to tell some of my students that these rules were stupid in passing (when it came up in their conversations in lab), but only one or two seemed to understand that false rape accusations even happen. Most have never heard of such things or believe the usual claim that they are so rare that one need not worry about them.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 03:35 AM
4

I wrote to the office of my university. Let me see if I can copy-paste it below. For clarity, let me say that I was marked "incorrect" for my answer. I eventually caved and finished the training. I later found out that there would have been no penalty if I had ignored it. Most of my classmates thought it was stupid, but only 1 refused to take it. To whom it may concern, I am a [university] student who was informed that I was required to receive online training regarding sexual harassment and ass…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 03:33 AM
6

Speaking for myself, I can say that I was once a feminist who viewed himself as the One Good Man. I was horrified when I found this subreddit, AVFM, and the MGTOW community ~a year ago.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 03:29 AM
37

As a male who just graduated from college, I have to agree. I tried to talk to as many men as I could about this issue on my college campus. Few seemed bothered. When I was forced to take anti-male "rape prevention" training that was filled with lies and half-truths, I emailed the Title IX Office, which ignored my email. After that, I just tried to pass my classes. I am out of school now, so there's not much more I can do as a student. Thanks for your work on this issue, Pierce. Unfortunately, m…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 10:16 PM
1

I jokingly talk about aspiring to like cock b/c men are easier to get into bed and they're generally in better physical shape, but I don't think it would actually be an effective long-term solution to the bullshit that is female nature, hypergamy, hypoagency, women keeping men in the reserves (friend zone), and the sexual reproduction of our species. Also, I'm not a virgin. FWIW, I heard Roosh might be gay. This doesn't make everything he says false, but it invalidates his claims of experience w…
/r/MGTOW23/06/15 11:30 PM
1

If your family keeps pestering you to date, they are inviting you to give them the Red Pill. Tell them that marriage is obviously (in its current iteration) a financial scam that women run on unsuspecting men, and the complacent support for this scam coming from your family and women in general tells you everything you need to know about the cohort (women) they are encouraging you to date. It's a trap, and you will have no part in it. Most families just want grandchildren, so tell them that you …
/r/MGTOW19/06/15 01:46 PM
1

Your brain keeps growing until ~25, and your T levels may drop off anywhere between 16 and 25. Looks like you're an early bloomer. I bloomed late.
/r/MGTOW19/06/15 01:37 PM
1

You should look into the MGTOW philosophy of Gregory Beckett on YouTube, I think you'll enjoy it. You both talk a lot about male shame and autonomy.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:35 PM
1

Interesting view, thank you.
/r/MGTOW16/06/15 04:03 AM
2

I don't really have a point, except that I thought some of us might be interested, given that there has been influx from TRP and PUA's into MGTOW, and they've brought with them such ideology as "alpha" and "beta" males. It will be useful for us (MGTOW) to be able to easily and quickly defeat such ideology when it comes up with recently ex-PUA's who are now MGTOW. This is a resource in such a discussion w/ new MGTOW. I agree with you, the conclusion should ultimately center on how there are bette…
/r/MGTOW16/06/15 04:02 AM
1

Edit: it seems to be a partial blog. The original appears to have been lost. If anyone has seen, for example, the "experimental" section from the original blog, I'd love to see it. The author claims that he challenged the PUA's to prove their methods in a clear, scientific manner by laying out an easy experiment, but I'm having a hell of a time finding the experiment.
/r/MGTOW16/06/15 02:01 AM
1

Pick a sport you enjoy and have a bit of skill in, and then figure out an area where you can improve. Lifting weights could be your sport, if you like lifting weights. For me, it's badminton. I need to work on footwork, game sense/court awareness (where to hit the shuttle), wrist strength, quad strength, accuracy, my serve, consistency of shots, and probably more. For my last semester of college, I played 3 times per week. That was good. Now I'm playing 5 times per week, and it's even better. So…
/r/MGTOW16/06/15 01:52 AM
1

right in the thick of it running away with children L O L, ty for my laugh for the day
/r/MGTOW16/06/15 01:32 AM
1

I'm 22 as well. Puberty ends by 25 for most men. It varies from person to person though. For example, I believe that my libido is dropping off, finally. Common strategies for men in our age range include masturbating before breakfast (and throughout the day as needed) and watching lots of porn. I play a sport (badminton), and I've recently found myself more interested in improvement in the sport than in sexually attractive women. This is sort of similar to the rest of MGTOW advice though: figure…
/r/MGTOW16/06/15 01:31 AM
3

I'll save this to watch some other time, I find this shit really disturbing. I wish I weren't mutilated.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 03:57 AM
3

I went for depression, stopped going after a while, and then went back for "depression" (parents forced me) after I had started to emotionally respond to my circumcision. I had known it was a stupid decision for them to have made, but it didn't hit me until I'd stopped going to the first counselor. After growing increasingly upset at my nonconsensual surgery, I revisited 2 counselors I had seen before. Both were unhelpful, so after the second counselor I put my foot down and stopped going. Every…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:01 PM
3

Yeah dude, shit sucked. I've tried 2 of them. Foreskin restoration and verbally attacking my parents (re their decision to cut me) has been a lot more useful for me. Also, marijuana. I know it will be a few more years before you can leave the house and berate your parents freely though, and most people think this isn't a good solution. To each his own. I found some relief in crushing their arguments under my boot heel.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:52 PM
3

So... what is mutilation, and how does neonatal genital surgery qualify or not qualify?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:49 PM
1

language policing Did you want to define "mutilation" and then discuss it, or did you just want to point out that you have an emotional response to this language that you don't appreciate?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:38 PM
4

In my experience, counselors just sorta stare blankly at you (me) when the topic comes up, and then they try to move along to something else.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:34 PM
3

In some ways, you can regain the functions of a foreskin. I have been restoring for a year, and my penile sensitivity has increased a good bit. The most sensitive part of your penis is still (somewhat) attached, and its function can be improved significantly, but it will take some time. PM me for details, and I'll explain what I mean. I'm not that happy about what I've lost either, but I am proud of what I have gotten back.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:31 PM
1

It's like how most men don't seek therapy before suicide, and we (Western culture) take this to mean that men are badly behaved or something, rather than coming to the obvious conclusion that there is something wrong with the services being offered. Every chance they get, it seems that people would prefer to point the finger of blame at men, even when it is obviously a fallacious accusation.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:25 PM
2

This has been my experience as well. There are a few friends who can't talk about their problems and can't listen to my problems, but they're the exception, not the rule, and such men (in my experience) haven't implied that I can't or shouldn't talk about such things; they've just been distant and weird in a way that suggests that they are the problem, rather than the emotive male.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:21 PM
1

So marriage is just over then? There are women who can get over their revulsion towards weaker men, and someday more women will be trained by society to do just that, just as I have slowly reduced my disgust at spiders by exposure to them in my room. But no, just as I will never love spiders, women will never love men just for being emotionally expressive. They may love men for other reasons and learn to ignore their neediness, and men may learn that they can be a tiny bit emotionally needy with…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:16 PM
1

I realized that I had internalized the anti-male monologue to the point where I had been denying that I thoughts similar to the main character's. By reading the book and empathizing with the character, I was able to accept myself and my sexuality far more.
/r/MGTOW04/06/15 12:47 PM
0

I'm glad I'm not the only one working through Kultgen. I've finished Average American Marriage, but I'm still working through "The Lie" and "Men, Women & Children."
/r/MGTOW04/06/15 05:49 AM
1

Chad Kultgen-> The Average American Male
/r/MGTOW04/06/15 04:45 AM
2

I started by showing my girlfriend videos of Karen Straughan on YouTube, try that
/r/MensRights03/06/15 04:06 PM
1

My grandfather is a psychiatrist who legitimately believed this shit when he advised that my parents cut me. From this, I surmise that many doctors really think that there are health benefits. I hold him and my parents responsible for their actions, and I think you can do the same. Most doctors are so indoctrinated that they think they're doing the right thing, so in such cases you end up with no one to blame for any of it (if you think that ignorance is an excuse). For men such as myself who ar…
/r/MensRights02/06/15 08:58 AM
3

I think peacocking while rejecting women has the potential to be amusing, and isn't necessarily against MGTOW ideas, but I agree with you that most MGTOW aren't in the business of honing their skills with women, so this (MGTOW subreddit) isn't going to be a particularly useful place to ask about peacocking at the human zoo.
/r/MGTOW01/06/15 07:33 PM
2

This is so true, thanks for this idea. I'll be sure to use it next time someone wants to talk about the evils of masculinity and testosterone.
/r/MGTOW01/06/15 07:29 PM
2

thanks for the idea. i've been talking about men's rights for the past year though, and he's a male feminist, so he's not interested in seeing any other side of anything. i'll watch some of it, but it's almost impossible that he would watch any of it edit: started watching. Molyneux goes straight into the social security scheme, and how, on average, it is a "free cash for women" scheme. Fuckin' brutal.
/r/MGTOW01/06/15 04:04 AM
3

My brother claims that it is immoral to make generalizations about people, but fails to recognize all the generalizations (men are rapists, men are abusive, men are evil, the SCUM manifesto) that are made about us. This myopia leads him to the conclusion that the manosphere is the only group engaging in such generalizations, and that we could all live happily together if men would just stop talking about women's behavior. He also thinks that protecting himself from abuse at the hands of women is…
/r/MGTOW31/05/15 03:34 PM
4

Fuck yes, MD representing good police practices!
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:22 PM
2

Trying to hammer the idea that men who have been circumcised are now broken individuals will only strengthen the divide and make them not listen. It's also too often wielded by spiteful uncut men that feel slighted that Western women thought their uncut cocks looked weird, and comes off more as a "this study says my sex feels way better than yours!" I'm a cut male whose penis is not very sensitive, so the sensitivity issue is a big one for me, but I agree with you that the mutilation and consent…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 07:51 PM
2

Thanks Kafka
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:22 PM
2

According to the study, men who were cut were 4.53 times more likely to use a drug for ED. I'll edit this in a second to tell you what section had this statement. I think it was near the end of one of the paragraphs in Results. Edit- second sentence of the 5th paragraph in results. Although drug use is not the most precise measure of erectile dysfunction, it effectively screens for the most severe and recurrent cases. A more accurate way of stating this finding would be "Circumcised men were fou…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 02:08 PM
2

If my previous response wasn't enough, here's the study author discussing the study and other similar findings. Career4.successfactors.com/portalcareer?company=McCormick&career_company=McCormick&site=&lang=en_US&navBarLevel=JOB_MGMT&subNavBarLevel=JOB_APPLIED&_s.crb=nlt%2bGXjPBInxz0iootxPLEW3dOE%3d
/r/MensRights26/05/15 06:39 AM
3

Among men circumcised after turning 20, 20% saw a decrease in sexual pleasure and 6% saw an increase in sexual pleasure. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06646.x/full
/r/MensRights26/05/15 06:33 AM
3

http://www.academia.edu/6395216/Alexithymia_and_Circumcision_Trauma_A_Preliminary_Investigation
/r/MensRights26/05/15 06:28 AM
2

are there any facts in particular that you would like to dispute? I haven't seen anyone dispute that the foreskin does these things.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:32 AM
3

http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/06/13/ije.dyr104.full difficulty reaching orgasm is a form of erectile dysfunction. this is from a survey of 5500 Danes.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 02:36 AM
6

That doesn't show that these aren't associated, this study just fails to find this. It doesn't disprove it. Do you understand what this means?
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:43 PM
15

PE is 4.5 times more likely in circumcised men. http://www.thewholenetwork.org/twn-news/does-circumcision-cause-erectile-dysfunction edit: my mistake, that was 4.5 times higher rate of erectile dysfunction. source: http://www.academia.edu/6395216/Alexithymia_and_Circumcision_Trauma_A_Preliminary_Investigation
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:47 PM
2

You must be new here. edit: did you watch the video?
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:45 PM
1

I was harmed by my circumcision, and the recovery ("restoration") is a very long road. It will be many years before I have my skin sleeve back in full working order. I also resent that I now have to live with my mutilators.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:06 AM
4

Good for you, just don't marry her. No matter how different she may seem now, there is a chance that she could change, and you don't want to invite the state into your relationship for the breakup.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 07:51 AM
2

What about the rape (by sexual mutilation) of Reek?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 01:36 AM
1

If we successfully sue a college and get a big wad of cash, we can put that money into buying ourselves a lobbyist. Student fees will increase, but it would be a nice thing for the men's movement, no?
/r/MensRights22/05/15 01:05 AM
1

we have stalls, but some of us prefer the whole room to be segregated by gender, not just the stalls.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 12:03 AM
7

It may not be up to them. If the Title IX office makes the wrong call, the entire school is liable for whatever damages you can produce from this. If the Title IX office wants to be feminist about this, it will be taking a gamble and opening itself up to lawsuits. edit for clarity: I think it will probably turn out as you have predicted, but there is some small chance that you're wrong. If you're wrong, things improve at this school. Even better, if you're right, we can perhaps get a lawsuit goi…
/r/MensRights22/05/15 12:02 AM
81

That blows. Get pictures and march over to the title IX office. Perhaps you can get a lawsuit started. At my school, they appear to have taken both restrooms, but that really pissed off my gf, who (like me) prefers gender segregation during defecation. There are other places to go on in the building, but it's a pain. Anyway, you may have the beginning of a fun lawsuit, if you want to pursue it. Merry Christmas!
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:37 PM
2

The case regarding the circumcision itself has been withdrawn because it is viewed as strategically counterproductive to go before a judge who has proven himself to be hostile (and thereby set a precedent in MGM cases). The legal fund will now be used to try to secure Heronimus's custody and her release from prison.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:33 PM
1

what a bitch as far as I can tell, not a single woman stood up to her about it AWALT
/r/MGTOW18/05/15 04:13 PM
5

"Of course I will circumcise my children if I have boys, I don't want my daughter in law to hate me!" While standing next to her intact boyfriend.
/r/MGTOW18/05/15 03:49 PM
10

A woman being raped means that men failed to protect her. A man being raped potentially means no one can be protected. Therefore, for most of human history, men who were raped were ruled out as "real men" as efficiently as possible, so men had to hide it. The underlying evolutionary psychology and fear still has some hold on the human psyche. Here's Karen Straughan talking about this, among other things. You should really watch all of her videos, but I'm pretty sure it comes up here. https://www…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 01:50 AM
1

False rape accusations are rarely followed by conviction of the accuser. Our society condones false rape accusations and encourages everyone, including those who haven't been raped, to come forward in the hope that some real rapists will be sent to prison. We live in a false rape accusation culture more than a rape culture.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:54 PM
2

Really, just as bad? Because there are men who have been treated like rapists, gone to prison for rapes they didn't commit, and consequently raped. How many women have been raped because some women falsely accuse men?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:53 PM
3

I also last a long time in bed. That wouldn't bother me much, except that most of what I feel pre-ejaculation is numbness. There's supposed to be a range of subtle to intense sensations that are pleasurable throughout sex, but up until ~3 minutes before I finish, I the pleasure I feel is so faint as to be almost imperceptible. In practice, my partner frequently finishes 2 or 3 times before I start to feel something strong enough that it feels good, and at that point if I slow down much, I won't …
/r/MensRights15/05/15 09:51 PM
3

You say that "it certainly doesn't keep me from being able to use it." Do you know what the functions of the foreskin are? Because you are almost certainly prevented from doing some things, like moving the skin of your shaft across the surface of your glans without any friction. That's how it normally works, and if you're cut (as I am, friend), you cannot use the sleeve as it was meant to be used.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:31 PM
12

Good for you. Did you decide to do it, or did someone else inflict his/her preference for circumcision on you?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:14 PM
7

Lol, don't feel insulted, it's nothing personal. We don't hold females who file false reports liable for their actions consistently, so there's no reason to trust you (or any woman) to be honest about such things as assault and harassment. There are incentives for you to be dishonest, and humans respond to incentives. He needs to protect himself from the possibility that you, a human, are one of the many who are responsive to the incentives to sue for sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:12 PM
6

I was thinking the same thing. What are these men supposed to do? They can't safely have meetings with their female staffers, because we don't protect them from false accusations.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 04:06 PM
3

If a republican wins and does this, I will vote to keep him or her in office.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 03:56 PM
17

If you don't like it, get yourself cut, but don't do it to someone else. I happen to prefer the silky-smooth glans that comes with a foreskin's protection, but if you prefer wrinkles and discoloration, I'll leave you to your penis.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 03:49 PM
6

Parents have no rights, only responsibilities and privileges granted to them for the benefit of the child. This does not benefit of the child, so the father has no "rights" in this regard.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:19 PM
3

It's not guaranteed that the child will say know in a clear way will be useful to the court later. For example, his father may threaten him and tell him that he can't say know. Alternately, the child may say "No" but not keep some sort of record of it. He should get a tape recorder and bring it with him to the doctor's office.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:17 PM
1

I'm not sure why, but I have met many women who prefer cut penises, and I personally am attracted to the visual appearance of nipple piercings on both men and women. My preferences should not dictate your body shape is the point
/r/MensRights04/05/15 03:30 PM
3

Sillymod is on his game! Yeah, I've heard those don't always close up and not everyone wants to have his or her ears pierced. Thanks, Sillymod.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 03:29 PM
1

Intactivism is big on the west coast, so the answer is yes, but idk where specifically to send you as I don't live there
/r/MensRights04/05/15 01:12 PM
7

Ya, we think it's a little silly, but if you want to opt into your own circumcision, Prince Albert piercing, or w/e else at18, go for it. Don't force it on boys though. This also makes us mostly opposed to neonatal tattoos, especially on children's foreheads.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 01:08 PM
11

I was introduced to the concept 2 nights ago by a frat bro. I misheard him, and thought he said he had "Dat Bod". I see my mistake now. Same idea (muscled and overweight at the same time)
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 11:09 PM
1

Pulling someone's teeth out at an early age would be a better analogy.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:09 PM
4

You can try to sue within a few years of your 18th birthday. I only found out too late. How old are you?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:54 PM
2

I think that we should compare circumcision to nipple piercings for the following reasons: -people will be grossed out by complications in either area -both are potentially pleasing to the opposite gender -very few people get these piercings when they are old enough to do so -both are usually performed with no medical need -both should be banned on newborns
/r/MensRights28/04/15 02:32 PM
2

Western circumcision originated from Kellogg's crusade against male and female sexuality. It survives because we're okay with the crusade against boys, because it is financially beneficial to the medical community, and because most people would rather cut and never think about it again than do some basic research. Social structures have been created and upheld that destroy many functions of the penis, and nobody gives a shit. This is viewed as a parent's right to choose. "His body, my choice." I…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 02:27 PM
2

Did I assert any such absolute as that implied by edit #2?
/r/MensRights26/04/15 08:03 PM
1

So it sounds like we're in agreement that traditionalist, non-working female spouses are functional examples of homeless women being courted and wedded by employed men who are economically superior, yes?
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:22 PM
6

I don't see men lining up to date homeless women, so... yeah. Dude, traditional housewives were homeless women who traded on their looks, homemaking abilities, and sex for a place to sleep. You see lots of homeless women with men... in the homes of those men.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 04:46 AM
6

NO IT IS NOT THE RIGHT OPTION Please get another doctor. Try lots of different creams and such before you start cutting anything off. Of the men who get cut as adults, 1/3 regret it, 1/3 are ambivalent, and the remaining 3rd are okay with it. I wouldn't take this risk with my genitals, and you shouldn't have to either. I am sorry about your phimosis though. I have some problems with my junk due to circumcision, and I know that it can be quite distressing.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 12:32 AM
7

If we assume that homeless men are people with humanity, personalities, hopes, dreams, and aspirations, and we note that women are not dating homeless men, we are left with the question of why. "Why are these homeless men single?" Remember, we're assuming that some homeless men have the personalities and the dispositions to positively interact with women, because, as I stated earlier, homeless men are people. So if it isn't their un-personhood, what is it that holds homeless men back in the dati…
/r/MensRights26/04/15 12:30 AM
10

You see a lot of homeless men being taken out on dates by attractive young women? Wake up and smell the hypergamy.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 11:27 PM
0

lol, 2/10 concern troll sorta funny, good try
/r/MensRights23/04/15 11:21 PM
0

She's really sexy. I hope she hits the wall in prison and comes out with the scarlet A that teachers earn when they have sex with their teenage students.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:08 PM
14

pls post her response when it comes in, i would be impressed if you created an "equality feminist" or w/e CHS is over Tinder. Good luck!
/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:04 PM
1

All I could find for contact info was his google+. No response on that yet. Did anyone find an email address?
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:19 PM
2

Here's a list of the functions lost and citations of the papers that support the list. http://www.cirp.org/library/sex_function/
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:39 AM
2

http://www.nocirc.org/touch-test/bju_6685.pdf
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:38 AM
1

The description I gave is true of many people. It's good that you're looking at the bright side or whatever, but the end result of those 5X higher premature ejaculation rates is that many men who experience PE would not if they weren't cut. edit: my mistake, there's a more simple explanation--the glans wasn't made for that much direct stimulation. my bad.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:15 AM
3

You opened with "except it isn't real foreskin." Yeah, I'm a little combative. For the foreseeable future, what I have now (plus what I'll grow over the next 2 years) is as "real" as I can have. Yeah, it's a substitute, but the alternative is... nonexistent, so the comparison to foregen strikes me as disingenuous. The true comparison is foreskin restoration vs. whatever is currently between our legs. It may not meet your standard of "real", but the "real" thing was fucking amputated, and foregen…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:59 PM
2

I'm asking you to define "real" foreskin. Can you? edit: the reason I ask is that "real" is not a very useful word here. I think the word you want is "complete." Foreskin restoration gives the covering, expands the mucosal membrane, and yields increased mucosal and glans sensitivity. You also get the gliding action back. All of these are "real" foreskin parts. You don't get back what was lost, but you can greatly improve the functioning of whatever is left by restoration.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:38 PM
1

the general advice is "if it hurts, you're doing it wrong, and you need to readjust or change something." I wear a stretching device for a few hours per day. It's uncomfortable at first, but there are things that I did to modify the device to make it more comfortable, and I got better at soothing my body through it. There was a bit of pain for me in the first few months, but that doesn't happen very much any more. A typical day of stretching for me involves me putting on the stretcher, wearing i…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:36 PM
3

I feel like you're attacking a method that has worked for thousands of men and discouraging people from acting now because another solution may come along in another decade. What, precisely, is "real" foreskin, and how is the regrown inner skin different from that?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:30 PM
1

The inner skin that is left is "real" foreskin in the sense that it is inner skin and it becomes sexually sensitive. This is because the dead skin falls off (leaving the nerve endings closer to the surface) and some nerve cell regrowth probably occurs. If you've lost the frenulum and frenular delta, that won't grow back, but you will still get more sensitivity. As for foregen... it's probably a decade out, it'll be thousands of dollars for the surgery, and you're already on /mr, so you really sh…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 09:27 PM
5

There is non-surgical restoration. It takes a few years. I'm a year into it, and I think the results are fantastic.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 08:52 PM
9

but thank fuck we have two little girls. ...Because you were wrong? Or because you didn't want to have to end your marriage in order to force a cosmetic surgery on your son?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 08:28 PM
1

Maybe you're right. He is clearly shitposting.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:32 PM
2

THIS. Men need a support network equivalent to that available to women. Such a support network will never be created, because it would necessitate that men be given resources equivalent to those given to women. When men go to use such resources, who will pay for them? Women are net takers from the social/economic structure, and when men demand the same privileges, the economic structure will collapse. We can do this for any male issue. It will come down to the money, and there will be none for m…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:34 PM
4

agreed. They can resist it, but there is currently little incentive for them to do so, so they don't. It's like how all women want tall men. Some will date lower for economic reasons, but they will never be happy about it, and they will never leave economic hypergamy behind as a basic preference in their dating lives.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 04:29 PM
2

bahahhahahahaha REKT
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:40 PM
3

Thanks for checking it out. Sorry to be so blunt with you. If it makes you feel any better, you can always restore. I'm a year into it, and although at the beginning the glans was the most sensitive part for me, dekeratinization has occurred, and the glans is now a bit more sensitive but the inner skin (right up against the glans) is now undeniably the most sensitive part of my penis. It fucking rocks, and I hope other men get to enjoy something closer to a whole penis.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:35 PM
2

Same (although I just gave up after 40 minutes, so idk what the true time would have been). Circumcision can drastically increase or decrease the amount of time to orgasm.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:31 PM
1

You have lower feedback from your penis (i.e. no foreskin, no frenulum, no ridged band or a less developed ridged band) on the way to orgasm, so your body surprises you. If you had more feedback, you would probably not cum as soon. Premature ejaculation is 5X more likely in men circumcised at birth. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02280.x/abstract Sorry for your loss, friend. If you want to talk about restoration, I'd be glad to help you tell you about getting started…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:30 PM
10

The most sensitive part is the frenulum and the frenular delta (or ridged band). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847 As such, Frgo, you're just flat wrong when you say that circumcision only slightly reduces the sensation on a small part of your penis. As for the head, the head (or glans) loses sensitivity as well as it is covered in dead skin cells after circumcision. Therefore, overall sensitivity decreases after circumcision. For more evidence, check out the famous Sorrell study. His …
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:22 PM
2

This comment has 33 points in the men's rights subreddit? With this edit? To all the little boys crying about having their dicks cut, I would like to cordially invite you to go fuck yourselves. I'm a male whose penis was nonconsensually cut. As a result of this, I will never know how it feels to have sex with an intact penis. I will never feel 100% of the sensation of a full-body orgasm. I have had difficulty orgasming for all of my life. I wish I had had a choice. If you don't mind your circumc…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:14 PM
6

facepalm
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:05 PM
6

It's not "overcautious" to sign someone else (even your child) up for an elective, cosmetic surgery that the child may not want later because the surgery could be more difficult later. If that's cautious, so is: * neonatal breast augmentation * foot binding * genital piercings at birth * most limb amputations Caution might not be the word you want. "Pre-emptive" may be more accurate. edit: bullets are hard
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:02 PM
14

But the child can give informed consent if you would only allow the child to grow a bit (~18 years) before cutting the child.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:48 PM
26

What part of nonconsensual genital mutilation sounds like acceptable parenting to you?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:37 PM
2

I'm in a relationship and I also consider myself MGTOW. It sounds like you might want to go your own way on your own though, or at least with a different woman. The biggest reason I'm still with my gf is that she is happy to leave me to my own devices when I want my space. If yours isn't okay with you going your own way in your free time, that is where, in my opinion, MGTOW becomes mutually exclusive to your relationship. I hope things improve for you, but if they don't... Well, there's always s…
/r/MGTOW20/04/15 08:32 PM
3

I guess I'll kick this one off. I think it's important that we shape our society as it continues to develop. One way to influence society is to raise or interact with children. I like boys (I used to be one, and I think they're fun to talk to), and I realized recently that I could interact with young boys without fathering children by joining acting as a Big Brother. Recommended activities, according to the website, seem to include sports, help with school work, and talking about daily life with…
/r/MGTOW20/04/15 08:25 PM
3

Can I ask what state you inhabit? That's awful
/r/MGTOW20/04/15 02:38 AM
21

1 in 8 women get breast cancer and it's a top killer. Cancer is a leading cause of death for men. It is responsible for 24% of all male deaths. http://www.cdc.gov/men/lcod/2011/LCODrace_ethnicityMen2011.pdf Prostate cancer is the #2 leading cause of cancer deaths in men. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/data/men.htm Prostate cancer is both common and deadly. Although many men survive it, this is no comfort for the men who die of prostate cancer. More research funding could (and likely would, as it…
/r/MensRights19/04/15 11:25 PM
1

Hey OP, you should read the comments below. You may get an understanding of why we don't want to work with feminists.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:17 AM
1

Probably in the comments of the post she's not linking.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:56 PM
5

Women have trouble empathizing with men. I have trouble empathizing with my toaster. To women, these (toaster, men) do not necessarily belong in separate categories.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:45 PM
2

Just curious as I've never seen results. I could never use a stretcher as I live with my fiancé and I don't think she'd ever understand Some women understand, so it may be worth asking her about it. My new skin is relatively tight when I'm erect, but loose when flaccid. I like my new skin a lot. You might like yours too :)
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:27 AM
6

I'd be happier with an extra 20 nerve endings over my current state, and I'll happily spend the time to get back what I can.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 07:51 PM
6

They may regrow, and ongoing dekeratinization has been great.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 05:34 PM
3

I'm sorry for your loss.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 05:31 PM
8

Nah, you're not the only one. I feel butchered. It makes me really angry. Here's what I'm trying to do to feel better about it. Most days of the week though, I wear a foreskin stretcher. I've been doing this for only 11 months, but i can already get 1/2 flaccid coverage. I feel less butchered with every millimeter I regrow. Plus, masturbation has gotten to the point of feeling amazing, even (and sometimes especially) without lube. I'm pretty surprised at how much more I like my body now than I d…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 05:30 PM
1

This American Life did an article on this a few years ago. It's cheaper in the US, b/c homeless people get all of their healthcare for free through the ER's, so it's cheaper to house the homeless and keep them from getting sick than it is to let them live on the street and come in with chronic illnesses.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 11:41 PM
3

What does a cheap solution to suicide look like? Hell, what does any solution to suicidality look like when men are looking down the barrels of guns?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 11:39 PM
2

Here's an interesting start for platform ideas. https://j4mb.wordpress.com/2014/12/14/j4mb-launches-its-2015-general-manifesto/
/r/MensRights31/03/15 11:28 PM
1

how can anyone make it equally common, given that more men work, and given that allimony assignment comes down to the decision of a judge?
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:49 PM
2

I think selective service has a lot of public support, and a campaign to end it or make it gender-neutral would allow us to gain greater mainstream recognition.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:47 PM
7

Are there any age requirements? I'm about to graduate college, and this seems pretty cool.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:03 PM
6

This is old. The latest news that I've heard of is as follows. 1) The family doctor agreed, after being lobbied by intactivists, not to perform the circumcision. 2) The father was granted the right to force his son to be circumcised, so the mother took Chase and went into hiding. There is a warrant for her arrest. That's where the story is right now.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 11:33 PM
1

What do people at your school think of this? Have you thought about trying to organize students to protest this? Because it's obviously discriminatory. You may even be able to file a Title IX lawsuit.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 11:23 PM
1

Trigger warning: psychobabble ahead. I think I'm right, but your mileage may vary. Hey buddy, it's hard to take these red pills, and I'm sorry for your grief. That's what you're describing at the end of the last paragraph. You're grieving for your dreams of partnership, your gynocentric goals, and your frame of mind. It sounds like you're in the depression stage of grief. The next step is acceptance, but not everyone reaches acceptance, and if you do reach this stage, it won't mean happiness or …
/r/MGTOW24/03/15 11:48 PM
1

What slug thing
/r/MGTOW23/03/15 07:51 PM
1

Thank you for this, it gives me some relief to see I'm not alone.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 04:49 PM
2

I'm pretty sure I found a NAWALT, but it doesn't really alter optimal dating strategy for me. I have to minimize risk and watch my back, because you can never know.
/r/MGTOW20/03/15 02:22 AM
0

I'm on my phone for a few days, so I can't do this yet, but could someone point him to the studies showing bias against boys in educational grading based on behavior, as well as school system design--less recess, no competition, and fewer male teachers than ever before? Other than missing the anti-male bias in schools, it looked okay.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:17 AM
1

That's the one, thank you Mr. Tracymorganfreeman.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 07:38 PM
1

All of this makes you laugh? That's pretty grim, it makes me cry. You must be a lot stronger than I am or something.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 07:34 PM
15

This is interesting, but surveys are a bit weak. The Sorrell study from 2007 should be the go-to for explaining this point. It's good to see more research continuing to emerge demonstrating this conclusion, even if the methodology isn't the greatest.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:21 AM
2

I love Palahniuk! I've read most of his older stuff (Fight Club, Choke, Rant, Survivor, Haunted, Lullaby, Invisible Monsters). Both Palahniuk and Kultgen write graphically about sex from a male perspective, and that's fun to read, but Kultgen is straight, which allows him to be even darker while discussing straight sex, imho.
/r/MGTOW17/03/15 06:12 PM
2

There's a lot of censorship on r/feminism, and the mods wield the banhammer with reckless abandon. I learned that the feminist subreddit is made up of mostly disinterested reddit users. Seriously, go look at the people posting and commenting. Last time I was there, most of the posts had fewer than 10 comments, and the mods were the most active users. Women aren't all that interested in feminism, lol, they just want the goodies (privileges) that have been won. edited for clarity
/r/MensRights13/03/15 03:43 PM
2

Are we sure this is about domestic violence, and not an encouraging message that female athletes should play aggressively?
/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:44 AM
3

This idea of rewarding oneself for staying motivated is a great idea. I do this sometimes.
/r/MGTOW09/03/15 09:17 PM
2

I have found it relaxing. If you smoke a lot, you may be less motivated than you would otherwise be. I've found taking my red pills to be seriously demotivating, and smoking marijuana allows me to take in MGTOW knowledge more slowly and to more effectively internalize the meaning. Marijuana helps me stay motivated by revealing the best parts of my life--cooking, music, badminton, even my science degree. For example, I rarely smoke before classes, but this morning I smoked before a science lectur…
/r/MGTOW09/03/15 09:15 PM
1

"hold your breath... good... yeah, i know you're choking, just a little farther..." if your partner is persistent, her gag reflex will slowly go away. It takes a bit of work and motivation though. r/sex has good blowjob tips from time to time, and i'd pass them along to my girl if she wasn't doing such a bang-up job already
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 02:57 AM
6

Do some reading on it. All circumcised men lose some functionality, but some lose more, and most lose a bit more than "some." I cannot feel anything through condoms, for example, and this is due in part to my circumcision. All men should have a choice not to undergo this elective genital surgery, and the best way to give men that choice is to stop circumcising boys at birth so that they can choose for themselves when they're older.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 07:13 PM
1

Start with 1 hooker, then make up your mind about more ?
/r/MGTOW07/03/15 04:34 PM
15

IMHO, there's nothing like guiding a girl through her gag reflex. Too dark?
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 09:34 PM
0

My gf and I were virgins when we started dating, and I've gotta say, we were both piss-poor at sex our first time. I've got her trained to do some pretty cool tricks at this point, but our first time definitely wasn't anything to write home about. Is it better if I (male) am not a virgin, but I'm bedding a virgin woman?
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 09:31 PM
1

I hate poetry, so I can't say if this is good or not, but I appreciate the effort, and I like the idea of mgtow art emerging.
/r/MGTOW04/03/15 05:13 PM
2

Citation needed
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:40 PM
2

As a chem major, I can tell you that we don't need more stem majors. At this point, at least in chem, additional workers only lower wages and raise qualification requirements. Most of my chem colleagues will have to go to grad school in order to get a job.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:33 PM
5

So many people tell me feminism is about equality that I start doubting what I thought. Then I see a piece like this, and I remember the truth.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 12:25 AM
6

you saw the woman with so much subcutaneous fat that it had created clefts midway down her breasts, right?
/r/MGTOW01/03/15 05:14 PM
3

Can men drop their children off in the boxes without the consent of the mothers?
/r/MensRights27/02/15 10:15 PM
1

Stupider ideas come out every day. I wonder if critical thinking is at an all-time low, or if we're just better able to document the stupidity around us than past generations. I'm only in my 20's, so I wasn't around a few decades ago.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 07:41 PM
3

Well everyday I wake up to the morning sunlight in an almost euphoric stupor, then I feel this burning sensation in my groin and I throw the sheets off the bed... And I remember..... "MY DICK IS BROKEN" Every day, I wake up to itching around the scar line on my penis, and it reminds me that my dick is maimed.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 11:26 AM
3

Jewmongers top kek I agree with your views on circumcision. As a guy currently trying to restore, I can attest that it can never be truly restored. The best people like you and I can hope for is to stretch the remaining mucosal skin forward and have the dead skin layers fall off (dekaratinization). It's never going to be as good as having a full penis though.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 11:24 AM
1

There was a lot of similar shite in my health class. It's annoying. Make a stink about it if you want to. I did. Nothing came of it, except a vp I knew sat me down and told me he knew the curriculum was bad, but there wasn't much to be done. I think I got to sit out of one day of class or something. It was worth the struggle for me, since I was able to prove (to myself) that the teacher was a moron, but that may not be satisfying enough to motivate you to speak out and ask for a source. Good luc…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 06:50 PM
8

I think you may have missed the implied sarcasm.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 06:29 PM
1

Bring on the downvotes, but... Is censorship really a Feminist value to the exclusion of women, or is censorship just toxic femininity that Feminism has cranked up to 11? It seems like there are many women who don't identify as "Feminist" who demand that every public sphere be a safe space from women. I mean, after 7 months of talking about the problems of feminism to my mother, she turned around the other day and claimed that men talking too loudly about rough sex on the train is "public harass…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 08:12 PM
1

What do you imagine that the consequences of jumping to these conclusions too quickly could be? Are people walking away from /MR? I suspect this is going to turn into a consensus around "Doxxing is bad, and we don't know who did it, and it sucks that it happened to bar bar and stardusk." What are the negative consequences that you see? Why does it matter? Or are you just pointing out the principle of the importance of evidence? edit: if you're just pointing to the principle of the thing... fair …
/r/MensRights24/02/15 08:03 PM
1

I don't care whom he blames, I wish he hadn't been doxxed. If it was an MRA, that's fucked up. If it wasn't, it's still fucked up. However, I don't think that perpetuating anti-MGTOW sentiments as OP appears to do is constructive. Who cares? This guy could lose his job. He could lose close relationships around him. People panic and jump to conclusions when they get doxxed or otherwise messed with (look at Karen Straughan's perhaps excessive panic--although, tbh, i'd probs react similarly--over D…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 07:58 PM
6

I emphatically agree with everything you've said, and I would just like to add that abuse is typically cyclic and passed along by family members, so if a teenage boy finds out that his gf is being abused, it is not his responsibility to save such a girl. If such a boy wants to continue a relationship with an abused girl, he needs to be supportive and try to help her deal with her problems effectively. This may involve things like talking, being empathetic, and occasionally calling the police if …
/r/MensRights24/02/15 07:50 PM
2

XD
/r/MGTOW24/02/15 12:57 PM
1

That was great, especially considering you had been drinking. Great work.
/r/MGTOW23/02/15 03:04 PM
2

Can I ask how this has been circumvented by the government?
/r/MensRights22/02/15 11:03 PM
8

Black Mirror is amazing, I think you'll like it. It has the depth of Breaking Bad.
/r/MGTOW22/02/15 06:29 AM
1

Yeah, bad idea, thanks for the feedback
/r/MGTOW21/02/15 10:17 PM
1

Yeah, bad idea, thanks for the feedback
/r/MGTOW21/02/15 10:17 PM
1

Yeah, bad idea, thanks for the feedback
/r/MGTOW21/02/15 10:17 PM
1

Yeah, bad idea, thanks for the feedback
/r/MGTOW21/02/15 10:17 PM
1

Perhaps you're right. I'll try it a few more times, then find another hobby if this doesn't work out. I think it's worth trying once or twice more though.
/r/MGTOW21/02/15 09:38 PM
1

More MGTOW>fewer MGTOW? Also, since when are MGTOW's classifying men as beta? What does "beta" even mean in the context of pseudo-sex separatist movement that advocates men defining their own self-worth? Are you saying that I'm not getting the approval of women that you think is important? I don't define my identity based on female approval, so it doesn't bother me if you call me beta, but you might be in the wrong subreddit.
/r/MGTOW21/02/15 09:37 PM
1

I haven't seen such a study, but I can corroborate this. I've been able to bait my friends into some real sensitivity if there aren't women present, but we clam around women about sex and stuff. I've been trying to talk more openly around women, but my male friends are hesitant.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 02:45 AM
5

Could this be real?
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:33 AM
5

You raise some really good points, and I really like your summary of the anti-anti-circ argument, but christ, that is so fucking dark. Thank you.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:15 AM
2

Foregen 981006983
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:12 AM
4

I've been trying to avoid pondering that thought, but... I can't say. I was hoping to submit it to the Reddit charity drive, but I can't seem to find it. Is it a charity, or is it a business? edit: it's a charity. here's the number needed to get reddit to donate: 981006983
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:08 AM
3

It's an interesting idea, and I wish them success and godspeed, but there is currently no known way to get new nerve cells to connect to existing cells. At best, it sounds like someone is going to have to flay the already-flayed (circ'd) penis to link up the nerves. Frankly, it sounds scary as f*ck. Still, compared to living with a once-flayed penis... I'd take it if it worked, but I worry that it won't really work for a long, long time.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 03:59 AM
5

They would like to regrow the nerves, but this is where the scientific discoveries are most needed. Theoretically, current science can decellularize, and sew some skin back on, but no one knows how to reconnect nerve tissue yet.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 02:13 AM
3

Here, here. I'm glad you have such values. I didn't always, but I'm trying to build such integrity.
/r/MGTOW18/02/15 06:12 PM
10

Haha you're not puzzled, you've heard all the reasons why a man would go along with that. Cheaper to keep her the state of family/divorce courts male submissiveness is taught in our culture where masculinity is demonized. it's all men know years of indoctrination that giving up male spaces, hobbies, and identity is healthy in a marriage Men do it because they're idealistic to a fault. I'm 21 and trying to tell as many men as I can these things to save them, but many (my twin brother comes to min…
/r/MGTOW18/02/15 05:56 PM
3

Some parts of this are strongly mgtow, but some parts aren't. Female perpetrators of violence? Check. However, I would like to point to what remains of the female protagonists soliloquy on being a "cool girl." The writer doesn't understand what men want, at a basic level. She thinks that women are competing on female status hierarchies (thinness, especially) because men care about these things most of all. Men want a fuckable woman, and that's the end of it. The character spent her adulthood com…
/r/MGTOW18/02/15 05:49 PM
19

I hope she nags him less than she did before, but somehow, I doubt that she's allowed him to do things like, idk, drop 10k off his salary. but, you know, maybe.
/r/MGTOW18/02/15 05:43 PM
10

Upshot: House Republicans are doing something for men, and we need to call our congressmen to get this bill passed?
/r/MensRights18/02/15 04:08 PM
1

Lurking to heat others' thoughts.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 06:40 PM
2

Anyone know where to get one of these?
/r/MensRights14/02/15 02:49 PM
1

This has been posted here before, I think. It's credible. I've seen all of this elsewhere. It sucks.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 06:44 PM
1

I think bodily integrity is high on the list. I would keep living and work with the MRM if I had a foreskin, I think.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 06:38 PM
1

I agree with you. For my part, I think you have to stretch my comment to claim that I thought the video was all about traditional conservatism, L O L
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:31 PM
18

You're wrong because you're a jerk! /s I realized a few weeks ago that most people don't even try to think systematically, so this sort of thing (disproving a point by ad hom) may make sense to more people than appeals to their own ideals, or pleas that our laws should be consistent.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:06 PM
3

These people seem like tradcons looking to blame men for problems in dating. This most comes out when they start talking about porn. Seriously, in the manosphere, we're going to demonize male masturbatory tools (porn) without talking about the elephant in the room--widespread circumcision that seriously reduces the sensations from the penis? If I had a whole foreskin, I'd delete most of my porn library tomorrow, but I feel so little without being extremely turned on that masturbation and sex don…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 09:57 PM
6

I've heard Latinas are like grenades: pull the ring (marriage) and watch them blow up (get fat). I don't suggest marrying anyone, including Mexican women
/r/MGTOW09/02/15 04:54 PM
9

boys are male, and males can't be victims /s
/r/MensRights08/02/15 09:06 PM
1

depo-provera will do it, but it will also cause nasty side effects, like a decline in bone density
/r/MGTOW06/02/15 04:58 PM
2

Okay, good point, I left out the part where I'm getting trashed beforehand.
/r/MGTOW05/02/15 08:36 PM
1

Everything down there still works The foreskin has over 60 functions, and many of them were forever lost. Although you may not miss these functions, and everything may work as well as you like, not everything is working. Sorry to talk about your body like this, but there are some things you don't have. I don't, either. I'm glad you've gotten over your circumcision, but it looks like you don't know what you're missing. You may take it a bit harder if you knew about things like the zero-friction g…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:45 PM
1

I'm sorry for your loss. What you've written resonates with me.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:42 PM
1

That sounds like a blast. If you have a camera and want to take pictures, please do. The blue pill mating rituals are too funny to leave undocumented. edit: then post the pics here :)
/r/MGTOW05/02/15 07:33 PM
2

I've always had a high sex drive. I'm trying to restore my foreskin so that I can start having more satisfying sex. I'm also trying to figure out how to get my gf to lose ~20% of her body weight, and I'll finish my chem degree in a few months.
/r/MGTOW05/02/15 06:12 PM
4

This husband is (imho) the expected product of feminist dogma being preached in schools, a total loss of male spaces, and the demonization of male sexuality. This poor bastard may not even know that he can be free.
/r/MGTOW05/02/15 06:10 PM
15

Thanks for using imgur
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:20 PM
4

I'm pretty sure TERFs have been making this argument for 20 or 30 years.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:51 PM
3

I was hoping my friend would. He sent it to me, so I asked what he though of it. "I'm with Cenk all the way. I agreed with everything he said." edit: is "drink more koolaid" too harsh?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:24 AM
1

There are very few medical conditions that circumcision alleviates, and it should be used only as a last resort. Stretching and skin creams come first, pls.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:21 AM
2

Some forms of mgm are worse than some forms of fgm, and some forms of fgm are worse than some forms of mgm. Some forms of mgm leave the penis nonfunctional. Some forms of fgm leave the female genitalia nonfunctional. The forms of fgm that leave the genitalia fully functional (type 4) are still illegal. We should make all forms of nonconsensual mgm illegal, as we have done to nonconsensual fgm.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:18 AM
2

implying male voices matter Maybe. If you believe in evo-psych, you come to the conclusion that male suffering is meaningless to many people due to inborn gynocentrism. If the men's movement continues to grow, I suppose we'll find out as more men do speak out and as more serious research probes the depths of gynocentrism in the public.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:49 AM
2

I, and a few other men, grew that movement to what it is today. I know how we did it, and I know why it worked as well as it did. And itdid work quite well, considering the budget. Share how you did it?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:28 AM
1

I am with ManWomanMyth on this one (he gave his opinion on the changes to UFC, and I think they're salient): I watch sports to see the best of all people. I don't care about "best female team", I care about the best team. Women are generally worse than men at League. If they want to have a kiddy pool for women, I don't really care. I think it's a misappropriation of funds, but the game is free to play. If Riot runs kiddy pool (female-exclusive) tournaments, I'll keep watching the pro games where…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 12:48 AM
3

Saved. Thanks for the great resources.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:19 PM
7

But the ambivalence — the unambiguous acts of devotion followed swiftly by hand-wringing and confusion, the breakups followed by tortured emails, the everlasting stringing-along — it got old. It even became the subject of a well-received novel. It's just so good. I've watched many of my friends be strung along by various young women, and it feels good to watch this woman struggle with the shoe on the other foot. Schadenfreude? Schadenfreude.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 01:19 AM
3

Yeah, you're right, it's probably not malicious in most cases. It's mostly just about what works, and men don't mind being the butts of jokes.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:54 PM
13

Women control ~80% of household spending, and I think there's a fair bit of masochism in the male psyche at this point. Male pain literally elicits laughter in people. I hadn't noticed it so much before, but last night, as I watched the game, I saw so many men struck in their sexual organs as a punch-line to a bad a commercial. Women and men think misandry is funny. Seriously.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 05:01 PM
2

I know I'm relatively lucky in terms of the timing, but it doesn't feel like much for most of that time, and I get sore quickly. I'm sorry it takes you so much longer, that sounds awful, but I don't feel like either of us is luck.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:34 PM
3

I hope so. It sure would be nice to have a whole penis.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:25 PM
2

I'm glad you posted too! Please don't apologize for the generalization; it's true to what you know. A lot of guys who have problems similar to mine don't complain since the opposite problem gets so much air time that a lot of people (including some doctors!) will respond to people complaining of long ejaculation time by pointing out that many men have the opposite problem. This further discourages men like me from speaking up. I'm glad you've learned a lot. Thanks for looking into this stuff!
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:24 PM
2

sigh
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:26 AM
5

Very rarely do you hear of a cut guy who can't cum. H-h-hey. Desensitized cut guy here. I'm an unusual case in that I'm young. Many cut men do eventually become desensitized so that orgasm takes 20, 30, 40 minutes, but it happens later in life. I'm bumping up against 20 or 30 minutes at 21 years old. It sucks. Most of the time during "sex" doesn't feel like anything more than numbness. So... respectfully, I would like to suggest that the problem you worry about is more common than you estimate i…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:23 AM
8

Rape, DV, and violence lies. I stumbled on Karen Straughan and AVFM a year ago and everything changed.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 05:14 PM
3

If you're so intent on learning the truth, then give up on the tone-policing and the concern trolling. You won't, because you are actually here to silence the largest group willing to speak the reality that you don't want to know. Instead of sitting down and reading about things like the massive holes in pro-circ research, you'd rather talk about your feelings and how we need to tiptoe around them. I'm sorry you're circumcised and having so much trouble coming to terms with it. As a fellow mutil…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:55 AM
3

Turning away from the topic at hand to talk about your feelings because you feel like facts are "shaming language" will also hurt the dialogue, lol.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:41 AM
2

I thought you wanted to learn the Truth about circumcision. What do you care about shaming language? I thought you were here for the facts. /s lol
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:22 AM
2

I honestly have no idea why people even entertain this guy with discussion anymore. This is the best debunking of this guy's position I've seen so far. Honestly, these get better every time. These #rekt threads are also great for seeing where arguments fall apart.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:24 PM
1

Erection is an involuntary response to physical stimulation. If a man says no, but does not physically resist, he has been raped. If a man is passed out and cannot say no, he has been raped. If a man is physically restrained and his "no"s are ignored, he has been raped. Women are just as able as men to use weapons, threats, or too much alcohol to incapacitate or subdue a victim. Examples of female rapists include female guards in juvenile detention, female teachers, mothers, sorority women, and …
/r/MensRights29/01/15 09:50 PM
5

fck yes, Hannah fcking Wallen to the rescue I love the internet thanks for trying to defend male bodies again, Ms Wallen!
/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:51 PM
14

Many circumcised men are upset about it. I'm circumcised, and I'm upset that I was circumcised. Most of the Intactivist subreddit is circumcised. Intactivism seems to be made up of people who had what is considered "acceptable" circumcisions, people who had bad circumcisions, people who enjoy their own foreskins (intact men), and assorted others (doctors, nurses, scientists, relatives) who are aware that pro-circ research is always poorly done or inconclusive.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:22 PM
3

The surgery can leave exposed nerves at the scar line, and exposed nerves generate a lot of pain when they're even lightly stimulated. Sorry, ExplosiveDonkey, that's terrible.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:19 PM
2

I'm glad this has gone to court. If Dershowitz is allowed to speak, we will get to the bottom of this. I strongly suspect he's innocent, but we'll see.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:30 PM
3

My father makes that argument, and ultimately it leads him to the conclusion that my problems with my circumcision are likely to be imagined. It makes me really angry, but I guess I could feel some pity for him if he hadn't circumcised me.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:26 PM
1

Whoa, GWW response Yes, thank you. I'm glad she's gone on to try to repair the damage she's caused.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 09:27 PM
3

Yeah, like that woman who decided that college kangaroo courts were bad because they were judging her son too harshly.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 06:38 PM
4

high-fives all around!
/r/MensRights25/01/15 06:33 PM
4

implying this discussion could ignore the issue of personal choice It continues to look as though you're in denial of what was done to you, buddy, and it still looks like you want everyone else to stop talking about your mutilation so that you can go back to ignoring it. I'm sorry you're having so much trouble coping with your injury.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 02:18 AM
3

Trans men would benefit from a right to bodily integrity, equality in the family court system, equal defense from domestic abuse, defense from false claims... Trans men are welcome here, but our movement is made for all men, and so we're fighting for the big legal issues first.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 05:37 PM
5

No true scotsman You have a new account, your first post appears to have been an attempt at concern trolling... Lurk more, so that you can figure out why we think the things we do. If you want examples of feminists making these points, I'm sure we can find them for you, but I don't want to sink 15 ideas' worth of time into responding to an account that appears to be a troll account. If you're looking to understand us, go watch the old videos of Karen Straughan, razorbladekandy, or manwomanmyth o…
/r/MensRights24/01/15 05:34 PM
2

My roommate dated this girl for a while at the start of college. She looked like a Vietnamese potato, b/c she was Vietnamese and unattractive. Anyway, they may have kissed once, but it wasn't that serious. I think she was his first gf. They started growing apart, and broke up after a month of dating. Next thing anyone knows, she's telling all her female friends that he raped her. Salient facts: they had never had sex everyone knew they had never had sex no one spoke up or contradicted her She di…
/r/MGTOW19/01/15 04:57 PM
7

Most people can't homeschool. As for GED, high school has the highest rate of male faculty in K-12, so I don't think it's quite as good a solution as you imply. My high school experience was mostly shit, but I was inspired in Senior year by an older male economics teacher who was relentlessly interesting in the classroom. That sucks that people don't have the choice where you live though. I'm sorry to hear that you had to suffer that crap.
/r/MGTOW19/01/15 04:42 PM
3

Yep. I essentially stopped hanging out with single women after a few such situations. I'm glad I found MGTOW.
/r/MGTOW19/01/15 04:39 PM
2

You're right, I just feel bad for the guy, as you do. There's only so much you can do though. I'm sorry you have to watch, it sounds unpleasantly suspenseful, like a bad Hitchcock remake.
/r/MGTOW19/01/15 04:29 PM
2

I think you should tell the guy, although possibly anonymously. Set up a ghost facebook?
/r/MGTOW19/01/15 04:19 PM
3

4chan.org/r9k No chads (alphas) are allowed. The board is full of lonely people who want to talk anonymously about their lives. It's really fun. Girls don't know about it, so it's sort of secret/exclusive.
/r/MGTOW19/01/15 04:16 PM
1

It's cute, Mr. Esmay, but relatively small, and it does nothing to answer the major flaws in the MGTOW book. Keep lurking.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:13 PM
7

It's a thing that happens to a lot of cut men. It happens to some more than to others.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 01:07 AM
3

It's worth noting that a large percentage (around 50%) of education majors are not teaching a few years after graduation. Still, this is a huge disparity in role models available to our children.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 12:13 AM
2

I think you should reassess considering legal neonatal circumcision as the default stance of freedom. In such a case, cut men have no freedom to choose to keep their bodies. Thus, a very key group (the group being operated upon) has no freedom.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 02:27 PM
1

We should make policies based on the scientific community's opinion. It sounds like you've decided that the scientific community has no clear consensus, and therefore we should make no policies. On a related note, you should know that our current policies are approximately no position, legally. Parents do what they like, and the government does not step in and doctors give varying advice. So it seems like we've achieved your goal, right? There's no consensus and therefore no policy. This is what…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 07:08 AM
1

It seems like the levels of evidence are heavily tipped against those who support circumcision. The studies are weak and contested, whereas those demonstrating harms (especially deaths per x number and the increased incidence of erectile disfunction) are solid. That's why I keep asking you for evidence. The evidence in support of benefits are hotly contested and appear flawed. I think all the studies showing benefits are flawed and can be demonstrated to be flawed, whereas those showing harm are…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:30 AM
1

preventing cancer, some std's, penile psoriasis, and a few other rare things. They also talk about how male infant circumcision is more effective than male adult circumcision, and that there is a smaller risk of problems. Oh, and a big one is that these people often argue that it's so painless infants sleep through it. Where's your evidence of a medical consensus on these issues? I see you, and... Well, the AAP just said that the risks outweigh the benefits, so routine circumcision is not advise…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:20 AM
2

I aim to teach all, but the grading system is currently artificially weighted in favor of girls. From what I've heard, this is due to feminist claims in the 70's and 80's that education was tilted towards men, and that these claims had to be corrected. Since women have always (as long as anyone has measured it, to my knowledge) held higher GPA's than men, the changes that came since then have hurt men and helped women in grading without significantly changed how much people are learning. My aim …
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:18 AM
3

Yeah, that's where I am too. I feel similarly about foreskin piercing or clitoral covering piercing. If you want to do it and you're 18, it's on you, but don't pierce your kids genitals. Christ. Actually, I've heard there's some benefit to piercing, so if I had a foreskin, idk if I'd do that to myself, but I sure as hell wouldn't cut the whole thing off, lol.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 11:01 PM
2

Yeah, more sympathy for new initiates would be good. Can I ask how you feel about circumcision now that you've been here longer?
/r/MensRights07/01/15 10:27 PM
3

Here's a doctor (James Snyder). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrcMYq0ASB8 I think it's a false controversy. There are many men who are unhappy with their circumcisions, and there are a small number of circumfetishists and religious leaders who pretend that there is disagreement in the literature. The research literature is relatively clear, but doctor's don't look at it.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 10:20 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2rl6sb/shaming_mras_for_disagreeing_is_not_okay_and_the/
/r/MensRights07/01/15 09:58 PM
2

I've seen you debate this here and on FEMRA debates, and I'm pretty sure I saw you vomiting your confusion all over Honey Badger Radio. You keep referring to harm vs benefit. Then someone points out harms, and you say generally that some people think there's a benefit, but I haven't seen you substantiate a benefit yet, other than your perceived control over your orgasms. First of all, slow clap to you, good sir, you probably want to be congratulated on your sexual performance, and I have no prob…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 09:50 PM
2

Some of these points were a little dubious. For example, the article's point 5 seems to imply that only low-value women participate in the cock carousel, but I believe Chateau Heartiste has evidence to the contrary. https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/02/15/hypergamy-sluts-and-smart-women/ Still, it was fun and written well. I enjoyed it.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 05:39 AM
6

This is a fun article, and we need more stuff like this. Thanks OP!
/r/MensRights06/01/15 11:41 PM
5

This is one reason. Another reason is that custody usually goes to the woman, whether she makes more money or not, due to anti-male bias in the family court system.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 10:42 PM
9

I've gone through my FB list and posted your response everywhere someone posted this video. Thank you, OP.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 10:20 PM
0

I feel hopeless frequently, for the reasons you've listed above as well as some of my own. Here are my MRA issues, followed by what I'm doing to make things feel less hopeless and/or change our society. 1) the lies about men, women, feminism, society, etc. I'm trying to educate my friends and GF about men's issues, bits of MGTOW theory, and other such things. In this way, I ensure that the stupidest and most obnoxious jerks are nowhere near me. I'm also thinking about starting a Men's Club of so…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 10:13 PM
1

I have hair and I'm 5'10, but no job. I'd swap the hair or the height for a foreskin, tbh. With the amount of porn available these days, women are... okay. Women are definitely okay. Some are good, and some are bad, but the availability of free porn today is amazing. edit: student
/r/MensRights06/01/15 09:55 PM
1

good question, lol
/r/MensRights06/01/15 03:38 PM
6

it looks like a rug
/r/MensRights06/01/15 03:02 PM
1

not watching TYT, but enjoy your anger-boner
/r/MensRights06/01/15 03:06 AM
1

Here's what I do with my time. 1) education 2) badminton 3) gaming 4) masturbation 5) cooking (in no particular order) Develop your own interests and try to form friendships with people who share those interests. I'm sorry for your shitty childhood, and I wish you luck with the rest of your life. You're on the upswing now, friend.
/r/MGTOW05/01/15 04:44 AM
3

Women have a right to bodily integrity in the west (no genital mutilation at birth, so genital alterations must be consensual). Men have no such right, and we would like such a right. This is a big deal to many men, and it is frequently understated or dismissed in a way that would not occur if it were women's genitals that were mutilated routinely at birth.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 02:14 PM
1

I'd prefer that you not
/r/MensRights31/12/14 12:10 AM
1

I have a LTR, and I have sex within my LTR. If we ever break up, I'll try my hand at PUA techniques and, should those fail, I'll start taking Depo-Provera to cut my urges.
/r/MGTOW29/12/14 01:09 AM
1

Straight male here, I'm using that for now. From a guy, it's got more playfulness.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/14 07:20 PM
1

dude, just blow him. it's okay, we don't care, this is a male safe space. you're gonna love it, and no one will think any less of you.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/14 07:01 PM
-2

You put this better than I did. Thank you.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 01:41 AM
1

I'm not a shill. I figured I'd throw in a shout-out to TRP-members as I like that board as well and they have also contributed to my knowledge base. I wouldn't call you paranoid, as there are certainly false-flag operations here and elsewhere, but this isn't one of them. Some of us simply enjoy both boards.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 01:40 AM
-1

I enjoy their field reports and I appreciate it as a male space where men can talk freely about dating, no matter how repugnant the discussion becomes. Nothing is so vile as to be dismissed purely for its objectionable nature. Instead, TRP discusses things based on their validity in the lives of the users. As a scientist, I'm all about coming up for models that aim to explain life. TRP is all about modelling the dating world. I may not like their models, and I may think that other models are bet…
/r/MensRights25/12/14 01:36 AM
4

I wish you luck. Males in early education are great for children, but it's hard on the teachers. Thanks for your work!
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:36 PM
2

Thanks, you too!
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:35 PM
2

perhaps I read too much into your post, sorry.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:06 PM
5

"break into" teaching? If you're going for middle or high school, the doors are wide open. That's where I'm headed. Elementary school, on the other hand, would definitely be a break-in.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:54 PM
0

This implies that any population, given enough time among children, would abuse them at the same rates that women do. There is no evidence to support this. It may be correct, but there's no reason, other than an ideological belief that men and women do the same things, to believe that women's abuse of children tells us something about male behavior.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:53 PM
1

"matter"? Sure, suicide attempts matter, but each attempted suicide is inherently less bad than a successful one.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:23 PM
3

Also, if consent can be withdrawn at any moment a consent form becomes meaningless, as it only shows consent at one time. A person can still claim to have withdrawn that consent after signing the document.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:37 AM
2

I greatly enjoy my porn. Being alive now, in many ways, is better than any alternative. I hate our society, I hate how we talk about men, I hate female hypoagency and the lies about male responsibility, but... sometimes, porn is pretty great. Fuck the neo-victorians.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:29 AM
2

Whether we're talking about it or not, the point remains that religious preferences are not viewed as a cogent argument when it comes to little girls' genitals, and so I don't think that's a cogent argument about boys'.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 03:08 PM
2

"It's religious" could also be said of female genital mutilation, to the extent that tribalism is a religion.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:59 AM
2

I'm glad to see someone who knows his stuff.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 01:44 AM
1

feel free to leave if you don't care about men's rights. Men have a right to bodily integrity, and this right is routinely violated. If the violation of men's rights doesn't bug you, leave the forum open to those who care about such things.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 01:43 AM
5

Female genital mutilation isn't the same as circumcision for men. There's a range of female genital mutilation surgeries. Some are more invasive than male circumcision, and some are less invasive. All are banned. The least invasive ones are a ritualized and anaesthetized pin-prick. Since we're all here and talking about this, I don't think you can really say it impedes sex or reproduction in any way that's significant. I can say that my circumcision impedes my sex life by reducing the sensation …
/r/MensRights16/12/14 01:41 AM
7

Point 1 didn't matter when Western countries banned female genital mutilation for women of ALL AGES. Having said that, banning it for non-medical reasons for children would be a great start (no more neonatal circumcision), and I would more happily live with that than the current situation. Backing up to your second point--very few men choose, once they are grown, to undergo genital mutilation for non-medical reasons. I'm sorry you sometimes wonder about your penis, but, from what I've read, you'…
/r/MensRights16/12/14 12:29 AM
1

good article, thanks.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 04:00 PM
8

I would appreciate it if circumcision were banned before I died. I'm already circumcised and unhappy with the outcomes of this decision which was made without my consent. This is a men's rights issue because genital integrity is a human right that we, in the west, give exclusively to women.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 02:52 PM
1

Every few months, she takes a few weeks off for vocal cord surgery. She sounds a bit later when she returns, but the she has more surgery a few months later.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 05:10 AM
0

You may speak for yourself about your potential to rape. The majority of men (90-95%) are repulsed by the thought of rape and have no desire to rape. I don't want to rape, and I'm not a potential rapist. If you would like to self-identify as a rapist, I suppose that's very kind of you, so we can all avoid you, but don't come here and tell me I'm one just because you have it in you. Most men are not potential rapists.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 03:23 PM
12

Vasalgel hits the market in 2017, I'm holding out for that. Every once in a while, there are major complications from vasectomies. I think I saw a post from a guy in r/relationships about a guy who lost both nuts and control of his urinary sphincter after a bad one.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 01:19 AM
1

You speak like an incel MGTOW rather than a MGTOW by choice (one who could have women if he wanted). I have an LTR. We hit 5 years next thursday. We're not celibate. I have choices, therefore I have freedom. I am free to go in whatever direction I want. Perhaps I've painted TRP with too broad a brush, but I've seen a lot of comments in TRP arguing in favor of lifting and lots of plates. My objections to RP are not to your (demonspawn's) lifestyle so much as labeling those who withdraw as "betas"…
/r/MensRights05/12/14 08:44 PM
0

Interesting, I guess I was wrong about the cigarettes. What do you mean by "cardiac event"?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 05:09 AM
12

TRP, just like PUA skills, is all about the idea of studying women's preferences in order to figure out what they most desire in a man, and then conforming to the parts of women's preferences that allow you to have the amount of opposite-sex contact that you want. It may work, but TRP-men are no more free than the uninformed "betas" they hate so much. TRP men are just better slaves. MGTOW is freedom.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 04:20 AM
1

How would you characterize her actions? Be precise, please. Not for me, but for yourself.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 04:26 AM
10

Getting a vasectomy isn't abuse, lol. It's your body, and you can do with it whatever you want.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:42 PM
1

You're right: there is a spectrum here, between "zero-sum game" and "win-win solutions." I guess I would respond that all of this is closer to zero-sum game than win-win, and that in many of these cases there won't even be a win-win possibility. The grandmother and grandfather will be able to see their grandchild more with shared custody, but the maternal grandmother and grandfather may see their grandchildren less if the default custody agreement is 50/50 in terms of time spent with each parent…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:37 PM
0

Men's rights and women's rights are a zero-sum game. For any one of the rights we are denied, there are benefits to women, and although feminists and women may choose not to acknowledge that our lack of rights grant them privileges, they in fact do. Unequal parenting (via the family court system) benefits women, and balancing this will hurt the aggregate group of women just as much as it helps the aggregate group of men. It should still be fixed, but it cannot be fixed without a negative outcome…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 07:11 PM
11

my opinion: get a vasectomy, but DON'T communicate with her. If she's doing this, the relationship is probably over. You may as well have your laughs as she tries to fertilize herself with spermless splooge. I'm sorry you're in this situation, it sounds like a nightmare.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:58 PM
1

Unicorns exist, but they're so rare, you may as well pretend they don't. The qualities you would want in a girl that would make her suitable for a LTR are hard to find in the female population. Your search for such a woman will be particularly hard because so many women pretend to be good LTR-material but have no intention of being good at LTR's. IMO, LTR's are worth it if you find the perfect person. Otherwise, they're sort of annoying if you're with a woman. Learn to love cock? Guys are pretty…
/r/MGTOW30/11/14 02:38 AM
3

MGTOW is a way of life, r/mensrights is the male rights movement. The MRM is the macroscopic movement for men's rights. MGTOW is how men live while the system is unequal and while the MRM is almost without influence. There is some overlap (I think both communities are good), but you should know that they're different. Stick around for a while, and you'll see what MGTOW is about. I think it's great.
/r/MGTOW30/11/14 02:23 AM
2

I agree with Jammin, put up an additional picture. Sharpie in pooper, perhaps?
/r/MensRights30/11/14 12:59 AM
3

Especially when you travel to foreign countries???
/r/MensRights27/11/14 08:38 AM
1

This came across my radar for the first time when Julian Assange was tried in absentia, and the entire case rested on the question "Is it rape if she consented to sex with a condom, and then he took the condom off?" The court decided that that made it rape. If this standard spreads, men doing ethically questionable things will be hurt, but women forcing men into fatherhood will be hurt far more. To the extent that we get fewer men forced into fatherhood, this is a great thing.
/r/MGTOW26/11/14 10:20 PM
3

This is wonderful. The next time a man is forced to father a child because his partner went off the pill, he can countersue for rape, avoid child support, and possibly threaten charges until his partner aborts. Not that anyone should necessarily do all of those things. But... men could.
/r/MGTOW25/11/14 07:06 PM
3

If we ever split up, I will.
/r/MGTOW23/11/14 06:04 PM
2

There are lots of ways you could have done this differently, but you didn't do it "wrong". If you want to see conversation gone wrong, go check out Creepy PMs. You have to be quite cunty to post there to begin with, so everything I've seen so far has been conversations plagued by misplays on both sides, but the OP's are so convinced that men are creeps that they don't even consider how annoying their sides of the conversations are. It's classic Dunning-Kruger effect driven by women failing to de…
/r/MGTOW23/11/14 05:48 PM
2

I construct my relationship with my gf of almost 5 years one day at a time. Right now, she is conscientious, caring, capable of having deep conversations and drawing interesting conclusions, and lovely. If those things change, I'll leave. We're not getting married, and we're not living together. I do the balance by knowing that I can leave, and that we're still having fun with one another. If that changes, we'll split. Also, I watch a lot of porn. It's great. RBK suggests starting the day by fap…
/r/MGTOW23/11/14 05:44 PM
2

This has many of the contradictions of women's dating profiles: the hypothetical male cherry picks the parts of traditionalism he likes and drops others. That's not a criticism; I think that's the writer's goal. I thought this was fun to read, and I think it's valuable in that it shows what a relationship tilted towards men's preferences would look like. No man would have every element in his list, but all men would have something from this if dating profiles were honest. Great read, thanks OP.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 06:41 PM
3

This is so well-written and level-headed, I would buy a subscription if I could figure out how. Is there a way to get this magazine in print?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:24 PM
1

I admire your ability to keep this clown on-topic and respond with facts, rather than emotion. Thank you for writing this.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:05 AM
1

You can do it with any amount of skin, since you're stretching from flaccid, but if you were very tightly cut you will have to start manually before you can apply a stretcher.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 04:58 AM
1

Dude, I used to do the same thing when I was younger! I wonder the same thing.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 04:56 AM
2

You can stretch the shaft skin forward and new skin will grow, such that the frictionless sliding motion of a double-walled skin sleeve can be restored. The specific enervation of the foreskin is gone though. The process of stretching the shaft skin is called "foreskin restoration"; it's a misnomer, but it's accepted, so that's what I call it. Foreskin restoration also increases the sensitivity of the glans itself by protecting the glans from rubbing on your clothing. Increased sensitivity usual…
/r/MensRights21/11/14 04:49 AM
0

I feel very much similarly. I'm trying to restore, as some have suggested, but it is painful and slow. It also pushes otherwise marginally unhappy people towards suicide, as it forces the restorer to be reminded daily of his mutilation. I'm sorry for your pain, suffering, loss, and grief. I have no idea what to do about our surgically altered bodies, so I can't tell you what to do, but I sympathize, and I am deeply sorry that you have suffered this.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 07:02 PM
3

saw this, grabbed a paper copy. I'm thinking of starting a scrapbook called "Men's Rights Movement Wins", or something like that.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 06:59 PM
1

Message is always key, but damn dat accent O.o
/r/MensRights20/11/14 12:35 PM
5

The sound (especially the bass) is so loud I can't make out individual notes or melodies when I go out.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 12:22 PM
13

I don't go to clubs. Part of the reason for this is that I suspect the music would be more audible on my laptop speakers, but part of it is that this practice of pay discrimination is far too common.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 09:54 AM
2

I made a post celebrating men's achievements on facebook and defended it to a feminist. It was fun, and I remained cordial as he tried to use shaming language (privilege and such) to get a rise out of me. So I'm feeling pretty good about International Men's Day. Happy International Men's Day to all of you! I hope yours have gone well.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:05 AM
1

So perhaps PUA's and redpillers are possibly similar to radfems, but absolutely not to the same degree. I think what unites radical feminism is the cult-like aspect of non-falsifiability, so skepticism and demands for evidence are what will save us from becoming male-centered radfems.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 01:52 AM
1

I get the impression that lies about exclusivity, monogamy, fidelity, plans for the future are accepted by these groups, but perhaps I'm wrong. I never quite got around to trying out PUA techniques or reading much into it. Am I wrong? Do these gentlemen rely on honest persuasion?
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:35 PM
1

TradCons in the movement base their plans on ideology, so I'm glad to see people like RBK fighting them. RedPill men and PUA's cynically pursue their own self interest above all else. This isn't anywhere near as bad as radfems, as these groups will never influence policy, but the idea of self-interested men willing to lie and manipulate as women do more freely in social interactions scares the hell out of women. Does this relate to your question at all?
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:25 PM
1

Thanks guys, I got it. You've been great.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 12:49 PM
3

good work on that website, thanks for your ongoing writing.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 09:22 PM
18

I knew there was good content on 4chan somewhere. Thank you!
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:58 PM
-1

...Is she actually going braless? edit: and will there be pictures? and how will she dismount staircases safely?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:02 PM
3

haha dat edit i make these sorts of mistakes all the time
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:32 PM
1

Legal Paternal Surrender for men, and the same right for women.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 04:47 AM
1

My issue is with the idea of child support for children you don't want. Since men pay the majority of taxes, this (the state should pay for more child support) is actually the same thing, but instead of one man, it's all men and women who work. It still means that women experience an externality (child support from people who's opinions matter little whether she should keep the baby or not). That's my dissatisfaction with this: you still leave women who get pregnant with a lot of choices and men…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 08:56 PM
1

Ohio law requires thatthe child be abandoned through the following process for safe haven laws to come into effect: "voluntarily delivers the child to an emergency medical service worker, peace officer, or hospital employee without expressing an intent to return for the child". Therefore, whoever has the child in her possession (and it is more frequently a "she" than "he" directly after birth) can give up the child without the consent of the other partner if the other partner is absent just by t…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:59 PM
1

After all, not all women get to shed their maternal rights and responsibilities. Some do, but not all. Actually, ALL have the right to do so where parental surrender is a right of women. Men don't have this right ever, and all women have this option. The current system is that ALL women have this right, and you're saying that this right should not be men's by "default" and should instead be a man's right only "in some cases". In the above explanation, you're supporting different rights for men a…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:26 PM
1

You personally cannot solve anything. We're not asking you to solve anything. It would be nice, however, if you would SUPPORT equality. For example, above, you support women's rights to dodge out of supporting a child, but not a man's rights to do the same. Obviously, we can't MAKE you do anything, but it would be nice if you would abandon your sexism.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:08 PM
1

Thanks for doing more research on this.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:04 PM
2

This is the crux of it. You're just a sexist, TaliaLackey, and since you're a sexist against men, that doesn't bother you. When people accuse MRA's of sexism, I'm going to have to agree that there are sexists in our midst, and then I'll bring them to this conversation.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:04 PM
1

Anythings possible, I hope your optimism turns out to be well-founded.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 02:14 PM
7

Yeah, christ, that sentence really is Frankenstein's monster, my apologies. We have a lot of people here. Reddit admins seem to be okay with brigades and false flag attacks against us. It seems like there should be some way to leverage our large population in order to receive fair treatment from the admins (i.e. punishment against those who brigade and hit us with false-flags).
/r/MensRights06/11/14 06:26 AM
2

Interesting stuff, thanks for the post. I worked at 5guys this summer, so I can't add much, but this field report is informative and well-written!
/r/MensRights06/11/14 06:03 AM
2

it feels like there should be some way to leverage our relative size such that brigading from other subs and other problems that can only be handled by admins are fixed.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:57 AM
1

it wont change until men stand up for themselves and demand equal rights with women! If society's preferences for catering to the wishes of women are societal in origins, this will work. If, however, gynocentrism is a product of evolutionary psych, men standing up will be met with derision and contempt forever. The game may be set in its course, and standing up for ourselves may not change anything. MGTOW for MGTOW's sake may be the answer, rather than MGTOW for the sake of political/societal ch…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:54 AM
1

Where? I thought that was the goal, but it didn't exist anywhere yet.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 01:08 AM
2

Start every day by fapping, as RBK does, and you will think about women much less throughout the day. A nontrivial portion of your desire for women is biochemical baby rabies that you may be confusing with romantic desire because our culture pretends that love and lust are connected. ...just my personal opinion. I find that my life gets easier when I fap more frequently. I'm sorry for your struggle, Anon.
/r/MGTOW05/11/14 01:12 AM
2

someone on the internet had a different opinion from yours? shit dude, I didn't mean to trigger you. offers hug
/r/askTRP04/11/14 11:19 PM
1

lol, this article reports more on the star's views on the rights of animals than it does on her views on men's rights. My bet is that this is censorship (her views in favor of MR were omitted because they made too much sense), but it is possible that this woman actually cares more about animals than men.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:41 PM
1

do you rent or own your home? and how soon can you move if you need to? I don't think it's a great idea, but it's ultimately up to you, so I would suggest you figure out how soon you can move before you start fucking her, and maybe make moves such that the time for you to move decreases to... a month? a week? There's a low probability that the husband finds out quickly, but there's a strong possibility that he figures it out eventually, and I wouldn't want to hang around very long in the house n…
/r/askTRP04/11/14 10:24 PM
-1

If this chick got away with this and her parents didn't protect her sister, shame on them. -- Riverfan, 6 upvotes go check out the rest of the comments in this thread. As for why this has so few upvotes, it may be due to SRS downvotes, or it may be due to the 5 other threads here discussing the same thing, which dilutes the upvote pool. I'm trying to be charitable in my response here, but you're kind of dumb. Have you thought about reading the other comments?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:53 PM
5

Even though abortion is hard, it is still a choice that men don't have. Once a woman becomes pregnant, she may legally obtain an abortion or surrender that child to the government. Thus, she has 2 ways to avoid the 18 years of responsibility of parenthood. A man has no such choice. By opposing my position as you've restated it, you're holding men and women equally responsible for a situation over which women have more control. If women are equal to men, and they have more control over a given si…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:28 PM
2

Well, I'm sorry for your loss, and I hope you can still do that.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:23 PM
1

it started as a joke, but the extremists moved in quickly, and the mods found it so funny to have extremists on the sub mocking extremists that they let the extremists run the place. over time, the extremists took over moderation, and the original joke has lost its humor as the user base that was in on the joke has slowly left or been kicked out and replaced with... more extremists. it's sort of the idea of a creature eating itself, if that makes sense to you.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:40 AM
4

do your research. not being the biological father is actually not a suitable defense in many cases. some of those cases are: 1) you've already payed for some amount of child support 2) the mother listed you as the father on the birth certificate it's a weird system we're running in the US.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:37 AM
3

welcome to /MR! it's good to see a feminist looking for equality.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:36 AM
11

the fertility rate in 1st world countries will fall below 1.6. it may go even lower. i can't remember where, but i read recently that something like 70% of men would not describe themselves as "ready for children/planning to have children" when they find out they are going to have kids. this stat included both married and single men. ideally, a lot of those men wouldn't have children that they don't want to have. frankly, i think it's appalling that they're held responsible for supporting kids t…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:34 AM
3

Debating feminists is a waste of time. Their points are easily refuted and they rely on fallacious arguments, but their ideas are persistent because gynocentrism, not feminism, is the underlying current in our culture. People buy off on the crap that is feminism because it gives them a framework wherein they can believe that showering women with privileges and special protections (which most people instinctively want to do) is GOOD and NECESSARY. "Feminism" is the excuse for the gynocentric beha…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:14 AM
12

Lynchings are back.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 06:51 PM
2

You're right; "least invasive" is a better way to put it. Neonatal circumcision must be the least invasive option possible, and it must be used to cure a specific disease, not just to satisfy a parents' preferences.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 06:46 PM
2

1) misspelled pre-nup 2) courts throw out pre-nups all the time for entirely arbitrary reasons
/r/MGTOW02/11/14 09:46 PM
2

Explicitly stating that he wanted to be a stay-at-home father and that he would quit his job as soon as the baby would be born to care for it.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 09:45 PM
2

cool project! thanks for your work.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 09:37 PM
-1

Wasn't he fired over an unproven accusation?
/r/MensRights02/11/14 07:16 PM
6

I would like to add a few points to your list. It's looking great so far. Selective service will be eliminated or it will apply to both genders. Neonatal circumcision will be illegal unless there is a medical condition for which all other remedies have been tried.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 05:17 PM
-1

he may be, but that is almost beside the point. cretin or not, he deserves due process.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 04:47 PM
1

I think it comes out on Valentine's Day, get pumped, it's gonna be amazing in theaters.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 02:39 PM
1

I think you're right, just wanted to throw this idea out there. Should i delete this thread?
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:54 PM
1

i know Colbert used to do culture jamming... does that mean he's going mock Sarkeesian? Legitimately discuss #Gamergate? Support feminism with obviously fallacious arguments? How is this going to go?
/r/MensRights30/10/14 07:50 PM
1

Huh. Thanks nicemod. I have strong feelings that commenting should be allowed, but my opinions probably don't matter. Thanks for the reminder/warning.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 09:23 PM
1

Some mods say we can't post. Other mods say we can't vote (up/down). Which is it? Is it both?
/r/MensRights27/10/14 07:46 PM
1

did the law pass?
/r/MensRights26/10/14 04:00 PM
4

are you saying that you don't think it's real, or are you saying that you don't think hypergamy should be considered an acceptable behavior?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 04:05 PM
4

Slim Shady LP (his first major album) It's the same album where you can find "My Name Is."
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:40 PM
5

IDK if anyone else saw her on Terry Gross, but she flubbed a softball question that she should have expected about LGBT issues. Here's the transcript. http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=321313477 If she can't defend herself on the spot from a soft nudge from the Left, she's unlikely to make it anywhere. She's like the Romney of the Democrats: no one particularly likes her, and she's so out-of-touch with real people and even with politics (see above; it's amusing) that…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 02:21 PM
1

You're right, thanks for explaining, I see what you mean.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 12:06 AM
8

Are there any news sites covering this in an unbiased way? Off the top of my head: there's the Breitbart article on the gamesjournopro email list, and... If a mainstream media source doesn't pick up the full story soon, I think we may have to just admit that liars won on this one. Truth and accuracy were on the losing side in the Ray Rice story and Trayvon Martin story as well. I think we've lost this one. edit: new idea from Rizzle Dizzle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiLxDhcUZIA
/r/MensRights20/10/14 04:49 PM
2

wrong video?
/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:44 PM
14

Eh? It's bad to spermjack men. What do you mean by "term of derision?"
/r/MensRights20/10/14 12:36 PM
1

You can approximate how recently someone was scratched, I bet. Also, you could file a counter-charge of assault (scratching). You're not allowed to scratch people, lol.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 10:23 PM
2

Haha I also noticed this. She seems to say the new laws ensuring shared custody are bad because women preferred it the other way, and that's the only justification needed to condemn this state of affairs. It's just so transparent. It's funny, until you notice our authors are employed as professors and have the implicit support of U of Minnesota.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 07:09 PM
2

Based Mom!
/r/MensRights07/10/14 12:36 PM
2

I think you've posted in the right area. I'm sorry for your suffering and the slap in the face that is being accused of privilege when you discuss your pain. You are a victim of sexual assault. I hope that you can survive this, but I'm sorry either way. Do you want to talk about it?
/r/MensRights06/10/14 05:59 AM
9

I'm sorry for your friend's sickness, he's had interactions with some real crappy people. I hope he recovers. Thank you for sharing his story.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 05:57 AM
1

yeah, maybe "keynote" wasn't the right word. oops.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:23 PM
2

how about you use clear language that more obviously demonstrates your objections to Thunderfoot? you think Thunderfoot (phil something-or-other) is creepy? that's cool, and you're entitled to your opinion. I'm downvoting you for lack of clarity. I hope you understand.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:00 AM
4

he was a keynote speaker at ICMI 2014. i don't like his politics that much (although they're interesting), but he does advocate for a circumcision ban, for holding female DV perpetrators responsible for their actions, and for an end to spanking. he is more than tangentially related to the MRM.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 12:57 AM
7

I wouldn't, because my rapist would finish raping me and then charge me for assault, and I could be arrested for assault /s (i guess it's sarcasm. i'm unsure if this would happen) I think all people should be taught, before they are raped, that scratching their rapist is a great way to defend yourself, because it provides clear evidence for the police. also, fighting back discourages rapists. If someone were to try to rape me, I would try to scratch that person on the face, chest, and arms, so t…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 08:20 PM
3

It's good that you acknowledge that what you did was wrong. I hope you seek counselling, because it sounds like you're not dealing with your anger appropriately, and that can't possibly help your bf's depression. ...imho Thanks for reexamining your view on the MRM! Welcome to the sub, and please leave your violence at the door :)
/r/MensRights01/10/14 08:12 PM
1

doxxing a text-to-speech video creator Sigh I greatly enjoy his work, and I hope he returns
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:51 AM
4

Go check out the research links on r/intactivism.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:32 PM
1

u/Dalkon , would you mind weighing in on the claim that circumcision does not alter sensation?
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:24 PM
1

I'm a male student who didn't join a frat on a frat-heavy campus. Let me try to explain. Part of the appeal of frats is the drinking. Part of it is that these guys can't go to bars yet, and they want to drink around women. I think they also enjoy having a men's club that is somewhat selective. It's silly, but many men in frats enjoy their frats, so I wouldn't want them banned. Did that clear anything up for you on the other side of the pond?
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:16 PM
1

I'm sorry that people shame you for your body weight. I sympathize. However, as others have said, this isn't a direction that I want to pursue. I'll point out the double standard and stand up for fat men when I see shaming, but ultimately excessive body weight may harm you, OP, and I won't conceal that.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:56 PM
1

This story was wonderfully poignant. Thank you for sharing it.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 11:56 AM
2

Thank you Based Mom!
/r/MensRights23/09/14 03:13 AM
3

Look what I found! http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/early-lead/wp/2014/09/19/hope-solo-and-the-domestic-violence-case-no-one-is-talking-about/
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:26 PM
4

This is a surprisingly good article posted on yahoo news. Color me surprised.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:23 PM
1

That's terrible; it sounds very painful to hear. My brother is not quite so bad, but he recently told me that he feels that I have not been wronged by being denied bodily autonomy. At least he isn't advocating mutilation of others (yet). Have you been to r/intactivists or the intactivist forum yet?
/r/MensRights17/09/14 10:23 PM
1

I'm sorry for our loss. You started restoring yet?
/r/MensRights17/09/14 09:03 PM
2

I feel the same pain every time I put on my stretcher. Our society has done males great harm.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 08:47 PM
1

legitimate feminist issues mental illness Kek This guy is implying that MRAs would agree that many/most feminists have mental illness issues, I think, lol
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:56 PM
3

I understand these things, so I won't date a career-driven woman like this. I don't know that this is sexist, so much as narcissistic and ego-centric. I wish more women I don't want to date would self-identify in this way.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 03:53 AM
2

I've been thinking the same thing about Ray Rice. The media, by attacking him and forcing the end of his career, may be destroying the life of a victim of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 09:09 PM
1

"What does that mean to you? Why do you say that? Is Feminism a hate group, and what's the difference?"
/r/MensRights09/09/14 09:23 PM
11

Sandman has argued in the past that this approach won't work for any of us in the West, and I think he's right. As for the moral outrage: this is the expected outcome from thousands of years of women treating their bodies as commodities. Feminism may protest the men who purchase access to women, but there is no stance made against the women who pursue these sorts of relationships, here or abroad. Where is the moral umbrage at women participating in ladies' nights or against the makeup industry, …
/r/MensRights08/09/14 01:26 PM
9

I am glad the media is at least discussing this issue for the first time, and I liked that the only anecdote sounded like a truly ambiguous accusation. Talk to your friends and relatives and get them to see FIRE's perspective.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 12:31 PM
10

i like this list, but i hope not to find a lot of women whose crimes are only alleged.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:16 AM
2

you made the right decision, don't be friends with people like her, and tell your friends that they should ostracize her as well. thanks for reporting your conversation!
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:37 PM
0

I mean, he talks about how she was doing it to 'improve' him, because she didn't accept him. I don't accept that is the correct way to interpret it. Regardless of how flawed her reasoning may have been, she didn't base it on beauty issues, but rather either on religious or health issues. You have a theory on why Aguilara circumcised her son. 6oodfella has a theory. Do you have a source showing how you came to believe you know why she circumcised her son? Because right now it looks like neither y…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 12:33 PM
1

you can have one or the other, but not both, lol
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:08 PM
33

One in three women have been or will be sexually assaulted at some time in their lifetime. One in five men have been or will be sexually assaulted at some time in their lifetime. i'm glad male victims are getting attention, but false statistics make this unusable. I cannot, in good conscience, show this to anyone i know, and we may be best served by deleting this
/r/MensRights28/06/14 05:23 PM
2

the phrase "lovecraftian horror" describes the phenomenon, imho. You've discovered that the world is horrifyingly cruel and uncaring, and only to certain people, and there are victims that society will acknowledge as well as male victims who are ignored. it's scary and sad to think about.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 12:10 AM
3

She says the APA approves circumcision, but then if you follow her link for this statement, the author has misinterpreted the article, which states that the APA continues to not grant its approval to the procedure. The APA has never approved of circumcision.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 03:00 AM
1

notably missing: false accusations but still a great piece. i hope this side of the story continue to be brought forward.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:03 PM
3

I'm on the receiving end of this problem. My father has gone way out of his way to try to tell me I'm wrong, there are no ill effects of circumcision, I'm just confused... you get the idea. I would suggest you work in an apology with him when you do the sex talk. Alternately, you could just sit on it, but please, if he ever brings it up, be sympathetic and kind. If he is angry, let him be angry. If he wants to try to restore his foreskin, try to help him find the resources he'll need. Please be …
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:09 AM
6

Welcome to men's rights! I hope you stay and keep reading. Feminists have a hate-boner for us MRA's, so I'm glad you came here to investigate for yourself.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:22 PM
2

yeah, sorry, i shouldn't attach my comment to yours i know we agree sorry for disturbing you
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:20 AM
0

When I started looking at /MR, I had no idea what was going on, and I said some stupid things. Elam has kept himself in check pretty well. The things he's said have been logical through and through, even if you don't like them (and that's a lot more than what can be said of MY early adoption of men's rights. i continue to be relatively stupid in what i say when i open my mouth). Elam is doing what he thinks will move the MRM towards a position of power in the dialogue of gender politics. Leaders…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:11 AM
1

the relative civility of this board is heartwarming, and it shows me the difference between MR and feminism. thanks for keeping this guy on track.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:36 AM
2

you have decided that you are the final arbiter of who counts as a feminist and who does not. this power of yours to weed out the True feminists from the heretical is quite impressive. what does r/feminisms think of this power? is it universally recognized? /s lol i'm sorry, but these people significantly drove the movement forward. these are famous quotes from famous feminists. Margaret Sanger doesn't count in your opinion? She was a major pioneer in pushing forward the availability of contrace…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:23 AM
1

sillymod to the rescue! someday, i hope to grow up to be as good at teasing these things out as you are
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:15 AM
1

I think we are related to TRP. Once I realized Feminism was fucked up, I had to rethink a lot of my ideas on women and social interactions. TRP is for the men who want to rethink their strategies but keep operating in the previously existing system. the MRM is for the men who want to rethink the system. Both the MRM and TRP are about looking at gender interactions from a perspective outside Feminism and figuring out what is going on between the genders. So we are related to TRP. We are both answ…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:29 AM
2

If you follow the policy decisions we push for to their logical conclusions, there will be trade-offs between men's needs and women's needs. For example, men want shared custody to be the default position in family court, and divorcees will negotiate from 50/50 (time distribution). The current policy, called the Tender Years doctrine, has it that women will get more custody as the default. The change will create equality but the trade-off will be a loss for women. Another example: abortion right…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:24 AM
2

true true :)
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 05:40 AM
1

glad to help, i might be wrong though. it depends on how you define "gender roles" i figure men and women are likely to never be doing the exact same things, and the different things that men and women do are sort of "gender roles" maybe there's another definition people are working from though?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:09 AM
2

Men and women incorporate their genders into their identities and use their genders, in part, to define themselves. As such, they gain some sense of self from their gender roles. Men and women will always have some sense of gender identity, and thus I think men and women will always have some sort of gender roles. I think the MRM is pushing for loosening enforcement of gender roles and altering what the gender roles are, not abolishing them altogether. Warren Farrell wants to alter gender roles,…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:50 AM
5

jesus christ, you like to derail, eh? I'm trying to talk about whether men and women like parts of their gender roles, and you can't stay on topic to save your life. a part of the classic dating game involves men buying things for women. that tradition goes in one direction, so it really doesn't matter whether men would like it if the tradition went the other way. I'm sure they would as well. the issue is this: I say A part of the dating game involves men courting women (buying them stuff, like …
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:42 AM
4

actually, recent research is suggesting that male fertility may decline as women's does, although there's a stronger drop-off for women. men have lower sperm counts and higher chances of making a kid with autism as the fathers get older. but the attractiveness piece is true. another option that few people talk about is waiting it out for a unicorn, and if that doesn't work, taking anti-androgens (depo-provera) to dull the sex drive. i'm dating a unicorn, imho, but i'll probably drop my testoster…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 03:35 AM
2

most women like to be courted. when you talk about all women, there will be some women who are outliers. if there's a trend among women though, it is that they like to be courted. the trend among women is certainly not that women DON'T like to be courted. so, in general, when talking about women and dating, if most women like to be courted in the dating game, we say that women enjoy the part of their gender role that includes courtship. if you would like to provide contrary evidence to suggest M…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:27 AM
5

http://i.imgur.com/hTo3ATI.jpg
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:17 AM
4

"not all women want that" What is "that"? did i say "all"?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:13 AM
4

Actually, no one wants to fully destroy gender roles. For example, women like to be courted. They enjoy men paying for their drinks and company on dates. Women just don't really like the obligations that go with this. Similarly, men like some of their roles in terms of masculine identity. Sports culture, for example, is enjoyed by many men. The women's movement is about redefining women's roles as most women want their roles to be redefined. Some women want to just abolish the idea of "woman" an…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:46 AM
3

I used to feel that suicide is preventable, but I don't anymore. I think the people who want to kill themselves do it, and the ones who don't or are on the fence have attempts that don't always work out for them. What I'm getting at is that I'm not sure suicide is a medical issue. Some ill people commit suicide, but this doesn't mean all suicidal people are ill. Rodgers was clearly ill. And he committed suicide. But if not all suicides are ill people, then "suicide prevention" can only get us so…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:03 AM
1

I wish the MRM was popular enough that it could absolutely survive a public rant like this, but against women, because I would really like to get something off my chest: men know best about the benefits and costs of circumcision.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:34 AM
1

What is the solution to a high male suicide rate? Therapy and medication don't do much. Suicide prevention is a misnomer, it's really suicide prohibition.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:41 AM
3

you did well in showing the strengths of our movement. i am glad you are out there, standing up for reasonable discussion with unreasonable people. thank you.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:26 PM
1

also, there are ways to force a man to be hard. for example, a rubber band around the base of the penis will keep him hard-ish. alternately, a cotton swab in the urethra would have a similar effect. both are horrible things to do to a man. so bad, in fact, that I would describe them as "rape".
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:08 PM
1

Because of the corruption perceived in the handling of rape cases and the poisoning of evidence, Paul Elam, as an act of protest, will vote not guilty no matter the evidence (I think he's bullshitting, to honest, but that's neither here or there) If I remember properly, this is basically Jury Nullification, a phenomenon that has a long history in the US. The whole idea of Jury of Peers is that your community has a check on the police, so if the police force is full of nutters, the community has …
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:41 AM
2

I love this piece, and it is a major reason why I don't condemn Elam, as many others do.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 07:23 PM
21

I'm 100% with you women are human beings, men are human doings (Warren Farrell's language)
/r/MensRights25/05/14 07:01 PM
1

Yeah, I agree with Azazel on this one. If a woman grows less attracted to you, you can't really alter her feelings well enough to make up for the fact that, by doing house work, you are systematically reducing your sex appeal. You can't be manly enough, in the long run, to overcome your self-defeating role. Besides, you're not operating in a vacuum. If you are in charge of some of the cleaning, and your wife becomes less attracted to you, and there's a hot neighbor down the street, no amount of …
/r/MensRights24/05/14 02:16 AM
4

I am against sperm donation and artificial insemination in the US because current court precedent allows for the father to be charged for child support. If this precedent were overturned, I would have no problem with artificial insemination or sperm donation. In response to your objections: 1) Irresponsible parents have children together all the time. Sperm donation enables single parents and couples with a sterile father to have a child that the parents can prepare for. Preparation for a child …
/r/MensRights24/05/14 01:54 AM
1

The comments section holds some good gems. For example, someone says she's bad at hiring female workers.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 06:58 AM
2

I love her videos. Thanks for sharing this!
/r/MensRights13/05/14 03:52 AM
16

Ex-feminist here. I'm glad to hear that you care about men's issues! I saw below that you disagree that feminism is a hate movement. We think of it as a hate movement because of the things that institutional feminism has done to hurt men. Here are a few things off the top of my head. This list is incomplete. Beatifying Lorena Bobbitt for cutting off her husband's penis and then claiming he raped her. http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/06/03/lorena-bobbitt-and-the-politics-of-hate/ The way feminis…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:40 AM
1

what if we all agreed to send FB screencaps to TIA instead? It's not tumblr, but it's a similar idea.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 12:45 AM
10

Rosin doesn't defend the girls. She seems to try to implicate the victim and muddy the waters. She goes into a weird game of victim-blaming, comparing his actions to those of a confused male who commits assault on another male. Go read that part again, it was a really weird analogy where she argued that the victim didn't do anything that was TOO TERRIBLY wrong. Weird, no? I would argue that Rosin derails away from discussing the girls in order to keep the reader's attention away from what happen…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 03:08 PM
3

My favorite aspect of this ad hom is that on feminist subs, the user may have been banned. Here, just downvoted. Even though free speech is ugly, we live through it.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:42 PM
5

I feel the same way, but this is still quite an improvement over the status-quo
/r/MensRights07/05/14 02:23 PM
3

yeah, it would have been a bit better with all the examples filled in
/r/MensRights06/05/14 01:28 AM
1

They claim a quarter million, but only have 50,000 users. Anyone know what's up with the numbers?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:46 PM
1

what do you mean by "checks them"? are you saying that frequently, as with Jon, they hop off TRP as soon as they get a chance to be beta with a girl who (they imagine) is different?
/r/askTRP05/05/14 09:56 PM
1

Gabourey Sidibe wasn't the only person giving an intense, inspirational speech last night at the Gloria Awards and Gala, hosted by the Ms. Foundation for Women. Amy Schumer gave one too, covering regrettable sexual encounters, crises of confidence, body-image issues, Sam Cooke, and being one's own fairy godmother. No one would praise a man for a similar encounter. But let's try it. I'll recount a similarly terrible morning, and we can try heaping praise on me for my newly-confident self, and the…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:46 PM
0

i haven't found any "yes" answers, do those show up as well?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:18 PM
1

Yeah, I'm going to have to pass as well
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:36 AM
1

How can you know when someone else is shadow banned?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:33 AM
2

the questions seemed blunt. in some parts, it felt to me like Steinam was leading the interviewer around by the nose. I know it was never going to brought up, but honestly the MRM is growing every year and it has brought up so many strong points that Steinam could have been asked about. For example, when Steinam brought up the "pink ghettos", the interviewer could have brought up all the low-paid majority-male jobs like janitorial work or landscaping. when the interviewer asked about the need fo…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 02:36 AM
1

I think I read it early in my high school career, but I don't remember much of it. It was in my bluepill days. I've ordered a copy and I'll be reading it over the summer.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 01:57 PM
1

Good thinking!!! yeah, I had a feeling that my implied advice (that you could potentially DIY) was probably pretty dumb, but I wanted to throw it out there as an option. Since we're already talking about your ball hair, and I feel like I can comment as someone else with ball hair... I worry, respectfully, that it may be very painful, and I fear for you. I'm sure you've considered the pain, and I'm sure you feel like it will be worth it. Silky-smooth scrotum actually might be worth it. I don't kn…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 05:57 AM
1

totally. we're dealing with it as well as we can though, IMHO.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 12:45 AM
3

Men and women are different from one another. Some men are more feminine than average, and some women are more masculine than average, but it is worthwhile to speak in such generalities in order to capture the middles of bell-curves in terms of how men behave. A significant portion of men falling behind in education is because men are hurt by their gender in school, and males being unfulfilled in the business world is a significant reason for men behaving more like herbivore-bachelors than the a…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 12:41 AM
9

OP, I agree with you. Boys and girls are fundamentally different, and a lot of the pride-points of the male gender are being thrown aside. In school, grade competition is being discouraged and eliminated. Boys can't sit still as well as girls and recess has been cut. The recess that is left is being increasingly sanitized (no dodgeball, no running, no tag... It varies by location, but on a national level dodgeball has been gone for a decade). Fidgety boys (who are more numerous that fidgety girl…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 12:38 AM
1

It is sexist, but it may not be something you want to push. It's sort of like providing flowers for gay marriages: the store owner gets to choose the services he/she provides. I'm sorry you are being discriminated against though. I hope that you are able to find someone to do it for you. Are there home-wax kits that you could use?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 11:07 PM
2

Please please please tell him
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:29 PM
2

I misstated my position, but can you relax? So the question of divorce and parenthood is inherently artificial. That is an exception. I apologize. I think divorce laws should be passed such that equal custody is the default. You're right, that should be changed. Perhaps existing custody agreements should also be changed. Look, I'm not even a libertarian! I strongly believe that we should figure out some way to help the poor of both genders, but I'm still in the process of figuring out how my vie…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:25 PM
1

The person, in discounting the 12 month data, is essentially saying that the variance from the numbers are too great from year to year for the numbers of a given year to be accurate. From this data, there is no way to know if this is correct or incorrect. There are other ways to tell, however. The answer has to do with the standard deviation. If I were to try to determine whether standard deviation is enough of a variable from year to year to explain this spike in 2010 (I'll just let you know, b…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:04 PM
2

The anger at the rich isn't really about the 1%, it's about the 0.5%. At the top 0.5%, the income from assets overcomes the income from labor. This is essentially the distinction between people who have to work every day at high-stress, high-paying jobs and the people who have enough money that they can live extremely comfortably on dividends and interest from their investments. With the death tax being as low as it is (if it hasn't been abolished yet in the US; i can't remember how exactly Pres…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 07:29 PM
1

poe's law this is hilarious though. i love this so much.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:59 PM
1

thank you for explaining. I agree with you, but feminism is grasping at straws as they lose control of the gender debates. I don't like how they're handling it, but it's useful to recognize the motives of feminism so we can get the most out of every opportunity. Someday, they will actually try to take on MRM issues, and we will have to make a decision about whether to give up any control of debates.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:23 PM
3

The Dear Colleague letter is changing education in the ways that the writers intended. The burden of evidence declines and men get fcked. I feel for any innocent man accused of rape or sexual assault.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:19 PM
1

Everybody who wants to fight this should go to facebook and argue that this is ridiculous and that female rapists outnumber male rapists 3 to 1. Here are your links: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A%3A1024648106477 Depending on whether you count coerced sex as rape, you have 7.6 or 16.9% of women raping men. http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/12/rapists-who-dont-think-theyre-rapists/ This one shows that 6.3% of men (120/1880) are rapists, and that the vast majority…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:17 PM
1

elaborate? which part?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:14 PM
1

That makes sense. I was wrong, and I apologize. Thanks for the explanation.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:23 PM
3

I think they ban people for anything that could lead to a discussion of men's rights when the post comes from someone who visits /MR. I think I've been banned from all the feminist subs on this account, and from a few on another account. They really just don't want to hear from us. It may not be so much malicious intent as much as fear on the mods' parts. I was a feminist until very recently, when I finally looked at what feminism in terms of its current goals and actions and the MHRM in terms o…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:18 PM
5

Respectfully, I disagree. I think that a lot of our users go to feminist subs to reach out to NAFALTs and hold their feet to the fire regarding the "equality" position that they claim to support. If feminists are willing to help us in gaining some more rights for men or giving men rights that are equivalent to those of women, that is something we should all be thinking about. If, in contrast to that outcome, it turns out that the mods and "institution" of online feminism is categorically opposed…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:13 PM
1

yup, thanks
/r/MensRights30/04/14 10:26 PM
3

I wonder the same, but about the hook-up culture. Is it possible that at some level some of these men looking for more and more partners are driven by unsatisfying sex? I wonder about my own desire for non monogamy as well (circ.ed male speaking)
/r/MensRights30/04/14 10:19 PM
1

That's enough for me, thanks for the encouragement, if it works that well for you I'd better get started again
/r/MensRights30/04/14 09:52 PM
1

Thank you, that's what I figured from my reading. What method are you using, how long is it taking... standard questions about restoration? I haven't been able to get the motivation together to get started.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 09:30 PM
3

There's a trade-off here between an incentive to bring down the hammer and properly count. Right now, the incentive only exists for bringing down the hammer. You're right, it's imperfect, but I still think this is the best option available to us. Cases with significant ambiguity shouldn't be held up as indicative of rape culture.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:43 PM
3

It depends on the day. Most days, my hands are very dry, so it's not too bad (like rubbing your arm). If it's humid or your hands are sweating, your hand skin will catch on your penis skin and tug, and this can be very lightly painful. IMHO, the worst is pre-cum. When your hands are dry and your penis is dry and you're about to cum, pre-cum can cause your hand skin to catch on the small amount of penis skin with pre-cum on it, so that most of your hand is moving freely, but you get intense tuggi…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:36 PM
7

i wish he could have :(
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:11 PM
9

Dude, stop, that's almost as bad as cutting off the tip of someone's sex organs! :P
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:56 PM
4

I have to use lube, if I don't I get chafing pretty quickly. It sort of depends on how rough you are and how long you masturbate for. In my personal experience, you can do it with lube or without, and most guys skip the lube because it makes clean-up easier (also, a lot of people feel weird buying lube). For me, it feels better with the lube, and I'm not trying to have a mediocre time masturbating. Do you know what I mean?
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:55 PM
2

Perhaps its a continental thing, but I could be wrong about the whole thing. Or perhaps Italy is special.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:52 PM
13

Story time: my mother's boyfriend went to get his appendix out at 12, and when he woke up, they had circumcised him. He has never gotten over it.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:44 PM
3

So yeah, in fairness, the foreskin would probably stretch and it might be okay after a few years, but masturbation would remain impossible and the staple would serve as a constant reminder of the threat of further violence if the child was caught again
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:39 PM
8

I think Karen Straughan put it best when she compared this to telling rape victims that others didn't mind their assaults, so... It doesn't make me that angry anymore. The idea that my body has been altered, for the worse, that I'll never truly experience sex as nature intended me to, that that my body isn't whole as I always thought it was... These are scary thoughts because they carry such weight whether they are true or not. I am sad that so many men burry their heads in the sand when this is…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:32 PM
1

NPR is obnoxious. I used to be a big fan of NPR, but I've been disillusioned with them since joining the MHRM
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:08 AM
3

thank you
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:46 AM
8

You can try to restore it by stretching your shaft skin, if you want. Your level of sensation will increase after a while. In total, it may take a few years. I've tried to start, but you have to do it almost daily, and I can't get into the habit of pulling on things down there in that way. I've read of some amazing things happening, like the glans skin returning to normal. It's almost certainly worth it if you have reduced sensation and the patience. It's probably worth it whether you think your…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:29 AM
12

I empathize. I'm sorry for what you've suffered, and I'm sorry your parents won't apologize
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:23 AM
10

I probably misspelled it, sorry. It means that a layer of dead skin cells grows over the living tissue to protect it from friction. It means we have less sensation :(
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:19 AM
2

interesting to hear about the refutation of the AIDS studies, thank you
/r/MensRights30/04/14 12:18 AM
9

I've been led to believe that it is less direly needed, in general soz, i overstated
/r/MensRights30/04/14 12:16 AM
9

you can't untangle "cleaner" from "not masturbating" though. They're two sides of the same coin. Masturbation was viewed as unclean back then. On a related note, Kellogg's emphasis on cleanliness was a major reason why we in the US shower every day, while in Europe daily showers are uncommon (I think that's true, right? I've only ever been to Italy for a couple weeks). Anyway, Kellogg believed that if people were cleaner, they would be less likely to scratch their genitals, and if people had les…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 11:52 PM
13

it's true. for example, if you have a foreskin, there is no need to ever use lube. the foreskin slides around for you. i am so jealous
/r/MensRights29/04/14 11:48 PM
26

I agree with you it was considered less cruel than circumcision btw, all of this genital mutilation was done without anesthesia aaaaand that is why i, and so many others, have no foreskin and a carotenized glans in the United States
/r/MensRights29/04/14 11:46 PM
52

I was snipped. I discovered all of this about a year ago. The video is hilarious because it is all true. There is no embellishment here. Kellogg literally thought that bland foods such as corn flakes could be fed to children in order to reduce their masturbatory habits. There was another procedure for men that didn't catch on. It was for the children of parents too squeemish for circumcision. These boys had their foreskins tugged over their glans's and then a silver staple was inserted through t…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:23 PM
3

so much SRS in here. fck...
/r/MensRights29/04/14 08:04 PM
1

awwwww
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:49 AM
1

It's on no schedule, we've been together 4.5 years, but someday we may stop dating. Sorry, I screw that up from time to time. i hope you're right
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:00 AM
4

you told JtO that your posting history was public. is it public, and can you find the explanation of your ban, or not?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 11:41 PM
1

I apologize, I don't mean to say that men HAVE TO live with this trade-off. I am currently dating a wonderful woman who allows me to be leisurely. I think it may be difficult to find a partner who is okay with a more relaxed lifestyle, but I guess it's worth holding out for those ones. After my current relationship ends, I anticipate having a tough time finding another relaxed partner. I believe that women want more than subsistence and leisure in their partners, but I may be (hope that I am) wr…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 11:36 PM
2

examples?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:39 PM
1

good point
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:58 PM
1

fair enough. I don't think what we've got is workable either, but if vasalgel ever comes out, the current system will probably be at the point where it's workable. a friend of my father was tricked into parenthood ("I'm on the pill, no need for a condom"... "I wasn't on the pill, give me teh child supportz") and that has biased me against the status quo.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:14 PM
1

He's a troll. I'm sorry that he keeps surprising you, it probably feels like repeated slaps to the face. I empathize, and I'm sorry for your pain.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:54 PM
1

When the US had fewer Big Brother laws, we had shotgun weddings. In places where government is not involved with enforcing paternity, others may pick up the slack, as fathers once did in the United States.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:52 PM
3

yes, that is precisely what i am trying to suggest that LPS would do. she could be pressured into an abortion, or she could take responsibility for her decision to have a child without the father's consent. let's look at some stats. for children born out of wedlock, by age 5, 40% haven't seen their fathers regularly in the last 2 years. (Myth of Male Power) It is relatively well documented that children are raised better with 2 parents involved, especially biological parents, than only 1. LPS wo…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:50 PM
2

I think that fatherhood is a salvageable role for men, but we need to pursue it through adoption. Other roles for men that I believe are respectable are inventor, creator, and educator. MGTOW is another option. As others have suggested (AloysiusC and WhiteThrone), if men want to work low-paying jobs and live enjoy their leisure time however they want to, that should be celebrated in and of itself. So much of the discussion around this seems to come down to "why are men providing less utility to …
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:42 PM
1

You do what you want, but when a woman entraps me into wage slavery for a child i don't want, i'm putting a bullet through the top of my mouth at a slight angle. If I could opt out of child support instead, I would. "Should be" matters to me, and is worth discussing, even if it isn't going to happen.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:36 PM
2

if neither person decides to check if the other is using birth control, or check if the other wants to have a kid, it's problematic. the system we have right now says that, in the above situation, it's up to the mother what happens next. Legal Paternal Surrender leaves the woman in control of her body, but it doesn't tie the man to her decision. if he doesn't want a baby and she wants a supportive caretaker, she can get an abortion and try again with someone else. how is this worse than the curr…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:26 PM
2

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree, but I'd like to fill you in on women's options. The female condom is similar to a trash bag, but made with latex. It moderately reduces both partners pleasures, rather than just men's. You'll note women not jumping on board. The iud is a slow-release device the doctor inserts. It releases a low dose of hormones and has few side effects, other than some women having no periods for months or years. It's pretty awesome for many of the women who use it. The a…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:50 PM
2

Nowhere yet
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:29 PM
4

Women shouldn't be able to force a man to support a child he doesn't want, and we're comfortable with the conclusion that, if the woman can't support the kid, SHE SHOULDNT HAVE HIM
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:15 PM
4

Another way to look at it is this: you're telling women they have to figure out how they'll pay for a kid before they give birth, or they'll have to abort. If you can't afford a child on your own, and your partner doesn't want a child, why should anyone enable you to have a kid? We seem to forget that we used to believe that raising a child took 2, minimum, plus sometimes a whole village, but until very recently no one seriously thought 1 person alone could be as effective at parenting as 2. We …
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:07 PM
0

This would be valid if men had the same contraceptive options as women. We're not there yet, so I don't think it makes sense to hold men equally accountable for an outcome over which they have less control than women.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:01 PM
1

he's an MRA like you and me, relax. he may be correct as well. I get tired of screencaps after the first page of an article, it's an imperfect way of displaying info
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:19 PM
2

I think I discovered this around the same time you did (~3 weeks ago?) Just to add on to what guywithaccount says, FEMRADebates has a rule that allows the mods to delete any post that makes a generalization about feminism. this means that anytime you want to hold up a bad feminist idea and say, "I think this is a stupid idea!" most of the response you'll get will be MRAs saying "I concur" and feminists saying "NAFALT". Then you try to suggest that feminism is flawed in that it can't come to the …
/r/MensRights27/04/14 03:33 PM
3

If the editors at AV4M are to be believed, Elam has been going deliberately overboard with the rhetoric over the past few years in order to more easily attract new men to the MRM and force the media to pay attention to the movement. They seem to be in the process of reigning in the rhetoric and switching to a more level-headed lead editor (JohnTheOther). So that's why I'm not worried about Elam--to a certain extent, he's just Colbert-ing it up for a few more years, and he's fully aware of the im…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 03:25 PM
2

I would like to submit the possibility that hating on specific women is different from hating women.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:55 PM
1

OP, your joke is hilarious. I'm so sorry but so thankful to you for sharing it
/r/MensRights27/04/14 05:05 AM
-1

if 2 drunk people try to play Hide the Pickle, we need to call it what it is: most likely to be clumsy and possibly indicative of problematic drinking patterns. I have never seen a sober person at a party hitting on a drunk person. In my college, the people looking for sexual activity are drinking, and the sober people see all the sloppy drunk people and are too grossed out to go for them. Sober-person-has-sex-with-drunk-person is a problem that has been so rare in my observations (i.e. I've nev…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:26 PM
3

If a woman presented me with this contract, I would ask her to fill it out, and then I would ask her to ask me for consent. Then I would turn her down because I don't want to have sex with someone who presents me with a consent form. I think that's what we should all do. boycott sex with these people or only consent to receiving oral sex. edit: I used to think that these contracts would be a good idea, but I see that Kay is correct. The real problem here is real rape, and real rape will never be…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:09 PM
3

I haven't been here long, but I'm glad to have you here, buddy. Welcome! I'm glad you feel like you can speak your mind freely.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:00 PM
1

when you read something ridiculously troll-y from a new account, report it. i did that once. the mods deleted the post. it was great.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:55 AM
1

I used to be ultra liberal, but red pills and Hillary's choices of fem causes are driving me towards the right. As I see it, the rich will make economic policy no matter which party holds power, so we might as well vote based on social policies (and the republicans seem more open to the mrm)
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:18 PM
1

sidebar is good. i'm much of the way through Myth of Male Power, it's a great book. does anyone know if the newest version has been updated? i bought the 1993 edition
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:54 AM
1

you state your gender and then state that gender doesn't matter in terms of creepiness. so that's a little strange beyond that basic level of non-sequitor, i'd like to point out that I've never heard a woman described as "creepy" with anything near the same level of contempt as when the term is applied to men. to say that both men and women are creepy when they use the apps, on its surface, is to be gender neutral, but the word itself isn't. it's a free country, of course, i'm just hoping to bri…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:00 AM
1

the first video was blowing up across my FB newsfeed as non-satire. people were posting it to their moms. i didn't share it because i had a feeling that men were being left out because they'd get a video like this. i don't think it's satire, but i'm probably wrong. what makes you thing it is?
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:06 AM
3

thank you
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:50 AM
66

these protests are dumb enough to be satire
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:45 PM
9

I am glad to say that I only have 1 more year in college. I fear for the young.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:35 PM
6

i don't really like the extent to which body building has become the norm, because of the pressure that it puts on me to work out more as a skinny guy. looking good while dressed used to be enough but that's okay. pull-ups and such aren't that bad, i'd just rather be doing other things, like drug use or replaying pajama sam
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:28 PM
0

femradebates is kinda crappy, you can't make generalizations about any given group without violating rule 1 of the sub and risking deletion, so attributing any actions or influence to any specific ideology becomes impossible, and a lot of the statements of feminists like "feminism is fighting for men's rights too" become impossible to refute because no one feminist can be allowed to stand for feminism, and no one group of feminists can represent feminism either, and no systematic ideology is all…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:48 PM
1

Feminists have done a lot to hurt the MRM, and it's a little silly to talk to feminists naively and ask for their help. A lot of their modern issues (human trafficing, which is mostly men into underpaid/forced labor; rape; child sexual assault; domestic violence) don't need to be gendered and in fact making these into gendered issues has harmed men by invalidating male victims of these crimes. So "But for this we should have issue raised that concern both of us" is a condition that has already b…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 09:44 PM
1

fair enough
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:51 PM
3

I agree with a lot of what you have to say, but respectfully I don't think that the underlying goals of TRP are necessarily mysoginistic. I think it applies to any person who would refer to "his" woman as a subordinate and an object I don't think everybody in their 20's is looking for a LTR. Outside of an LTR, men use women and women use men. I think it's pretty intuitive to women, to a certain extent, how to use men. (Warren Farrell explains it by pointing to the puberty gap- girls start thinki…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:16 PM
1

It's sort of a curious mindfuck to try to interpret what your downvotes are supposed to communicate, eh?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:07 PM
2

I agree with your point about selection bias. Frankly, I think it's good that misogynists get a space to talk about their issues and what they've suffered, so it's good that they're here rather than stewing alone. Having said that, it would probably be best for the movement if misogyny could have its own space so that we could separate it from those of us here who want political action :/ edit: I read some other people's ideas about misogyny and how it equates ROK with r/beatingwomen. I'm no lon…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 10:58 PM
3

Yeah. Some people say that feminists are working for women. Others wouldn't say this. My bad.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 09:43 PM
1

I agree with the principle, and I think there could be value in participating with the NAFALT feminists, but I honestly can't find anything the NAFALT's stand for that I agree with. So I'd like to say that they should offer their help to us, and I'll offer mine to them, but it's so hard to find anything as existentially important to the NAFALT's as support for male victims of DV, prosecuting false accusers, or fixing divorce court is for men. Has anyone seen anything sympathetic on the NAFALT-fe…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 09:11 PM
-1

ya, pics would be nice too, but a location is good :)
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:45 PM
1

Minor counterpoint: wouldn't this bill make more stats available, so that we could more easily confirm that pay is equal? Doing sporadic studies seems less useful than doing ongoing checks, as the White House bill would mandate. Does anyone know how the current Equal Pay Bills are enforced?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:25 AM
1

haha yeah, in my mind I conflate HR with school administrative jobs, I guess they're different though. Sorry guys.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 06:16 PM
7

this could be true for women as well as men. alternately, since 1972 there could have been a major growth in middle-class jobs dominated by women that I will arbitrarily (okay, actually, this is the sector that I am referring to) call "Administrative posts" and this growth in Administration may have coincided with a decline in manufacturing and other typically male jobs where women didn't go upon entering the workforce. Has anyone else thought the growth of Administrative positions was an intere…
/r/MensRights14/04/14 03:29 AM
2

good to know, thank you
/r/MensRights13/04/14 12:26 AM
2

If you don't cohabitate you'll be fine, I think. I'm planning to get an apartment near my SO. Have clear boundaries
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:16 PM
3

it tends to be underdeveloped if you've been circumcised. that's why yours and mine is not sensitive. also, it tends to be a bit smaller
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:49 PM
3

yep, that's it
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:48 PM
-1

whut?
/r/MensRights12/04/14 02:10 PM
1

Wow, I live in the US and it's bad enough that I think of Catching the Bus (a.s.h. idiom) out of frustration. I'm sorry sir, Sweden is probably even worse. You have my sympathy, and I wish you luck with life in that country.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 09:23 PM
6

I keep telling myself I'm done talking to feminists, and then I do it again. It's probably worth it to talk to non-feminists about MR issues though, since you might create an ally.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 02:07 PM
0

l o l
/r/MensRights10/04/14 07:32 PM
-1

Sorry man, I feel for you. If a woman screws up first, we all say "turn the other cheek", but because you're a guy, society says you deserve what comes to you. Just out of curiosity, did you happen to catch any of the contents of the debate?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 04:14 PM
0

any chance of posting a pic with no identifying info of her (like on imgur)? pink dreads and a mask sounds neat to look at
/r/MensRights10/04/14 04:11 PM
1

Thanks for clarifying
/r/MensRights09/04/14 06:42 PM
0

Unfortunately, for some, this is not an option. Sex is a need so instinctual and basal to them they cannot NOT have it. Depo-provera ftw
/r/MensRights09/04/14 06:09 PM
1

a woman's ambivalence about sex makes it more likely that you will be accused of rape :( if verbally asking for consent makes a woman more ambivalent about sex, then asking for sex paradoxically may be the worst move possible for averting a false rape charge. alternately, you could get written consent
/r/MensRights09/04/14 06:06 PM
2

I used to do this w/ my gf in my blue pill/male feminist/mangina days, and she would sarcastically say no. Then I would feel bad, so I'd bring it up with sex positive feminists and ask them why no one ever asked me for my consent, and they would just say "Oh..." Feminism's incomplete answer to this problem was one of the major reasons why I left feminism and started looking for real answers.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:58 PM
6

It's because the mainstream has embraced a lot of the most moderate ideas of feminism, including feminist double standards. MensRights starts by taking down double standards that society embraces, so even the most moderate of MensRights issues appear to be fringe (because society doesn't want us to talk about them)
/r/MensRights08/04/14 01:57 AM
5

I just got banned from r/feminisms. People really don't like to hear incessantly moderate opinions that differ from their own. MR is trying to change the discourse and educate people, but the purpose of the thread is to encourage new ways to think about these issues and share our experiences, not to get things done necessarily. If you feel like spreading the word about /MR, go talk to feminist subs and tell me how that goes for you. I'll keep working at it as well, but I like the large amount of…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 01:55 AM
0

Here's the raw data. Sort it by position, and you'll see there's really not a pay gap, it's just that women are less prominent in higher positions. https://opendata.socrata.com/Government/2013-Report-to-Congress-on-White-House-Staff/44xn-rs2p Obama has more male staffers in higher positions, but that doesn't necessarily mean that Obama is discriminating based on gender. It could be a correlation with the female gender, rather than an actual decision to not hire women to senior positions because …
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:19 PM
1

I'm glad to have you here, welcome to the MRM!
/r/MensRights06/04/14 07:28 PM
6

So really, who is doing who a favor? "whom" SJW's are full-potato when it comes to grammar.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 07:27 PM
3

Women will always have something very close to LPS other than abortion: adoption. Women can deliver their children and disown those children immediately. LPS tends to be couched in terms of "sign LPS documents sometime before the child is born, maybe even BEFORE INTERCOURSE, and you can go on your merry way." Women can deliver the child and then give up the child to the government until the child is an adult. This is an option many times stronger than the "make up your mind before the kid gets h…
/r/MensRights05/04/14 11:38 PM
0

It is most likely that the right/left divide that pushes the two of you apart is irrelevant politically (i.e. it won't change, no matter what). For example, I'm a lefty, and I want more money for food stamps. The president is a black Democrat, half of congress is liberal-ish (which adds up to most of the group necessary to allow more people to get food stamps) but the president cuts money to food stamps every year. Now, I may be wrong about the actual value of food stamps, but the Democrats clai…
/r/MensRights05/04/14 11:30 PM
1

such pm's might be meant to be taken ironically. it doesn't sound like a well-delivered joke though. sorry.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 02:13 PM
2

pure TRP gold right there
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 11:37 PM
1

I'm working my way through the Book of Pook. Where would you suggest I start reading for more about TRP?
/r/askTRP01/04/14 11:06 PM
0

you're my savior, thanks Meglomaniac
/r/askTRP01/04/14 11:02 PM
1

could be; divorce laws are such that after the kid grows up a bit, the baby may no longer be his. weirder (sadder) things have happened
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 10:58 PM
1

be careful is there anything specific you suggest? she's about to turn 21. more sex? i've also been thinking of hitting the gym
/r/askTRP01/04/14 10:57 PM
1

started dating at 16. thank you for the explanation.
/r/askTRP01/04/14 10:53 PM
2

Sounds like OP might be the Alpha here congrats
/r/askTRP01/04/14 10:52 PM
1

Can you elaborate on the age range qualifier? Where it comes from/how?
/r/askTRP01/04/14 10:49 PM
7

"Giving" within the SavageLove readership means "happy to provide pleasure for his/her partner". It is part of the acronym GGG (Good (at sex), Giving (of pleasure), and Game (down for anything)). It is a qualifier that is applied to good males and good females, and is part of the Blowjob philosophy of oral sex: everyone should be willing to give good head. Longtime reader of Dan Savage here; I thought you might want to know that this gay guy has embraced straight men into his life. I'll see if I…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 10:42 PM
1

i was so alarmed
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 10:25 PM
3

I would suggest not saying anything about feminism because her friends will turn even more against you, and you may create an even more radical fem if you ascribe your departure to feminism. she will become an enemy of the MRM for life, whereas some day she could be our friend. allies will be useful as our movement becomes more public. But I know that OP will do what he feels is right. Good luck OP!
/r/MensRights31/03/14 11:52 PM
1

This was posted to feminism as an example of... something. It wasn't clear. It got a ton of downvotes.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 07:51 PM
44

I wouldn't date a feminist. It sounds like she's becoming more involved in the movement, and she's policing communications (deleting your comment without talking to you is childish or malevolent, only she knows which). She's interested in her own victimhood, and feminism will continue to seduce her with promises that everything is someone else's fault. I don't mean to be a dick, it's just that this happened to a female friend of mine, and I haven't seen a woman turn back from it. At the same tim…
/r/MensRights31/03/14 07:49 PM
-1

I'm dating a half-asian woman. She's honest that she is almost exclusively attracted to white men, and I'm honest that I'm almost exclusively attracted to asian women. i feel so bad for all these men confronted by feminist asian women with questions about their dating history. Not that you can ask a woman how many men she's slept with, because that's misogyny, but going after men for having racial attraction vectors? fair game.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 04:07 PM
1

thank you
/r/MensRights31/03/14 12:34 AM
1

Found the bs, sorry, I didn't mean to rustle your jimmies.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 08:58 PM
1

can you give an example beyond this case? I don't doubt that I was wrong about her, but I'm looking for other examples. Since everyone else already knew she was full of crap, this can't be the first time she did something stupid.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 08:44 PM
1

I used to like Penny in my blue pill days. She at least talks about male victims of sexual assault sometimes. What am I missing?
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:49 PM
1

If she doesn't want you to meet him, perhaps she should sign a document of some sort guaranteeing that your son will never meet her boyfriend. If your son is going to meet your ex's new BF, you have a right to vet him and confirm that your son will be safe. It may be awkward for her, but it's going to be rougher on the child than it could ever be on her (after all, she's getting sex out of the whole thing; what's your kid getting out of your ex getting a new BF?)
/r/MensRights28/03/14 02:35 AM
4

This man is so brave. it's a pretty screwed up world out there, and I'm glad the person who wrote this is walking around in it.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 12:19 AM
0

We as a society used to have a social system based on the nuclear family where men worked outside the home to provide for their families. Men were protectors and providers. Women worked in the home and raised children, in general, although 20% of women worked through the 1800s. Feminism came along and gave women the same privileges as men and freed women from their historical responsibilities. No movement freed men. Men are kept in roles the don't like by societal expectations, shaming technique…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:47 PM
1

sorry for your divorces man, go check out "Sandman" on youtube for more info that will help you decide whether to MGTOW it up or to keep dating. I'll agree that dating is hell, and you got a bad date, but I'm not sure that men really have the power to dictate how dating will change. I fear that such decisions may have to come from women after men become MGTOW and leave women with no options except to change.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:51 PM
2

A friend suggested to me that I look into Robert Bly and Sam Keen for other ideas of masculinity. Opposition to feminism is legitimate, but there are other ways to define masculinity. Here's wikipedia on Bly's ideas: Mythopoetic men emphasize "elder honouring", "reclaiming" fathers, and "unleashing the wild man within", but with an emphasis on the impact of fatherlessness on men's psychological development. This view of masculinity holds that the historically male role of fatherhood is central t…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 09:24 PM
2

TheRedPill is an interesting place, but perhaps it's not for you. Someone elsewhere on MR recently summed up the division among men discussing gender pretty well: Men's Rights sees ongoing sexism and inequality against men, and MRA's work to fix the system and create equality. TheRedPill and PickupArtists see that the system is broken, and they'll talk about how it doesn't really work in the egalitarian way that feminism purports that it would, but then these groups say "screw it, I'm going to e…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:01 PM
2

I also am relatively new here. I found GirlWritesWhat on youtube and reddit to be useful. I also found that Warren Farrell is even-handed and that he uses a lot of sources, so that he is highly credible. I'm currently reading "The Myth of Male Power" and it's addressing a lot of the most important points that I would want everyone to know. Farrell's books are a little old (the one I cited is from 1993), but the world has not changed very much, and some parts have become more misandric since then…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:53 PM
2

yup, you caught me jesting. good retort
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:28 AM
6

Anyone else going to be identifying as genderqueer from now on? I'm seriously considering it at this point, it seems like a good cop-out. I don't believe in the patriarchy, but I'm not a rapist, so...
/r/MensRights24/03/14 10:29 PM
2

Could you address the arguments against AellaGirl's ideas? I'm new here and possibly not as smart as you, and I'd like to know what I'm missing. Pls shoe me teh lite
/r/MensRights24/03/14 09:13 PM
3

I agree that the paranoia is a problem, but bear with me for a moment: If votes are not the only thing driving democracy, what's left? Policy isn't random; it's people choosing what moves forward and what doesn't. The idea of a shadow government, when stated openly, sounds ridiculous, but there are non-elected officials designing policy across the US. A humorous example that is semi-appropriate for this board: Obama says he doesn't do anything without consulting his wife, and no one bats an eye …
/r/MensRights24/03/14 09:09 PM
1

Does anyone know how to talk to a plate about gaining weight? and encourage the plate to lose a bit of the weight/not gain more?
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 07:45 PM
3

any chance of posting a video or audio to the interview? i'd love to hear/see your professor
/r/MensRights24/03/14 07:00 PM
2

I'm glad you believe in democracy, but not all of us believe that every vote counts. Anyone else vote Dem in a liberal state? talk about a waste of time
/r/MensRights24/03/14 06:58 PM
11

YAAAAYYY RATIONAL DISCUSSION i'm reading the book right now, and it's pretty hard to hate the guy. he's conscientious and he doesn't seem to leave many holes in his arguments. he's even a former feminist and former board member of NOW-NYC. he seems to have moved on from feminism because he wanted to spread the emancipation to men. anyway, thanks for your complete explanation of why AMR is being silly
/r/MensRights22/03/14 04:08 AM
7

Yeah, I'm going to have to agree with my libertarian friend here and blame the ideology rather than women. Thanks /u/chasingNAWALT
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:52 PM
4

if the state is co-opted by a feminist agenda, doesn't that result in structural inequality in this arena (prison sentencing)? what's the difference?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:03 PM
23

What about the prison inequality? Women who commit crimes equivalent to men's crimes get less time in prison. The black/white divide is smaller than the gender divide but one is racism and one is... sexual dimorphism? I think women and men should spend equal amounts of time in prison for equal crimes (rape, murder, burglary, arson, child abuse...)
/r/MensRights16/03/14 06:02 PM
6

Implying women don't already say this with their breasts covered by 2-4 layers of cloth and foam lol
/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:58 PM
1

Can you upload your interview when you're finished? If you upload the audio, I'll do a transcript for you
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:21 AM
1

I screw up facts all the time, no shame in it. Thanks for checking up on this, both of you
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:02 AM
1

wow, thank you! i've had sad experiences with condoms, thanks for responding so eloquently and helping me find a better product
/r/MensRights13/03/14 12:45 AM
6

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/11/12/rapists-who-dont-think-theyre-rapists/ 120/1900 college men are willing to rape. the rest aren't. most men aren't rapists, and most men don't want to rape. As for women... http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023%2FA%3A1024648106477 almost 1 in 10 women are willing to try to coerce a man into sex. now, i'm not a fan of feminism, but i think a lot of us can get behind their assertion that coerced consent is different from freely-given con…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 03:21 AM
4

I think the best first step would be to pick our issues. We could put it to a vote. I think we should pick the top 5 issues for men and try to push those all over reddit. For me, here are some important issues: Domestic Violence protection should be equal Circumcision should be illegal for anyone under 18 (or the age of adulthood in your country) When 2 drunk people have sex, no one is being raped. it's possible, however, that we young people should all drink less. An add-on: most men don't want…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:35 PM
1

I'm new here, what's the polar opposite of AMR?
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:11 PM
3

Your story is wonderful. Thank you for sharing it with us.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:46 PM
1

you're too sweet! thank you u/VortexCortex, and the same to you
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:41 AM
1

can you site the "men traded conscription for the vote" thing? I believe you, but i really want to be able to demonstrate this important point about voting rights to my friends and family. Many thanks!
/r/MensRights09/03/14 07:58 PM
1

thank you. this is the first time i've submitted anything of this style. I know my writing is trash, but I do aim to improve it, and I appreciate your patience with my bad writing.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 07:26 PM
10

The comments on this article are coherent and wonderful. I don't believe in god, but I hope some greater power brings lots of oral sex to Mark Neil, whereever he is. THANK YOU MR. NEIL.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:55 PM
5

A lot of men didn't know what it was when they had their sons circumcised. My father doesn't know what the foreskin does or how it affects sex or sensation. People didn't talk about it 20 years ago, as far as I can tell. Having said that, I think it should be criminal to circumcise a boy. The evidence is plentiful and readily available.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:24 AM
0

Women don't even consider themselves responsible for their own choices. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/27/married-moms-cheat_n_4868716.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular In this survey, the number 1 reason women cheat is to spice things up (approximately equivalent to men cheating because they want to have sex outside the marriage). The next top 4 reasons given, however, are essentially that it's the husband's fault. My understanding of marriage counselling is that men catch tons of flack for gi…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 08:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter